The URL can be used to link to this page

12 SWAMPSCOTT ROAD - ZONING { Landfill Closure & Proposed Transfer Station Project — 12 Swampscott Road Proposed Permitting & Construction Schedule Meeting/Activity Target Date Board of Health Coordination Meeting September 1, 2007 City Council Public Hearing (Status Report) November 13, 2007 File Notice of Intent with ConComm February 14, 2008 ➢ Public Hearing#1 February 14, 2008 ➢ Public Hearing #2 February 28, 2008 ➢ Public Hearing #3 March 13, 2008 ➢ Order of Conditions Issued March 19, 2008 City Council Mtg (Excess Property Designation) February 28, 2008 Supplemental Site Reviews by Northside Carting, Inc. ➢ Traffic Impact Study Draft Complete ➢ Air Quality Impact Study Draft Complete ➢ Noise Study Draft Complete DEP Enforcement Conference March 13, 2008 Modify Existing ACO with DEP April 2008 Updated Property Appraisal (underway by City Appraiser) April 2008 MEPA Filing— Environmental Notification Form April 2008 Site Assignment - Minor Permit Modification Request to BOH April -May 2008 ENF Comments Due May 2008 MEPA Findings May 2008 BOH - Public Hearing (Site Assignment & Tonnage Increase) June 2008 Salem City Hall—93 Washington Street—Salem, MA 01970-3592 Ph.978-745-9595 Fax 978-744-9327 I T F City Council hearing re. Transfer of Property to Northside Carting June-July 2008 NSC to Initiate Final Design July 2008 Submit Final Landfill Closure Plans to DEP October 2008 Initiate Demolition of Existing Incinerator Buildings February 2009 Initiate Landfill Closure & Transfer Station Construction April 2009 Salem City Hall—93 Washington Street—Salem, MA 01970-3592 Ph. 978-745-9595 Fax 978-744-9327 Letter of of Transmittal -- UBUL]. Group, : Date: June 3,2008 inc Engineers . Scientists . Planners To: Whom it May Concern 315 Norwood Park South Norwood, MA 02062 781.255.1982 Lincoln,RI-Rocky Hill,CT email: BETA@BETA-Inc-com RE: City of Salem—Transfer Station Expansion Environmental Notification Form Tel: We are sending you: ® Attached ❑ Under separate cover via The following items: ❑ Shop Drawings ❑ Specifications ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Report ❑ Electronic Files ® ENF Form copies Date No. Description 1 6/3/08 ENE Form - Salem Transfer Station and Landfill These are transmitted as checked below: Purpose Status Resubmittals ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ® For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment El Remarks: To Whom it May Concern: On behalf of the City of Salem and Northside Carting, Inc.,BETA Group,Inc. submitted this Environmental Notification Form on June 2, 2008 to MEPA in accordance to regulations. A copy is being provided to you under r MEPA filing and circulation requirements. cc: Signed: Ll'e 6&6t Julie Ritsick BETA Project# : 3407 Environmental Engineer Ref: Documentl r Environmental Notification Form Salem Transfer Station ' and Landfill Closure ' Salem, MA Prepared for: ' City of Salem 93 Washington Street Salem, MA 01970 and Northside Carting, Inc. 210 Holt Road North Andover, MA 01845 t ' 1 BETA Group, Inc. Engineers•Scientists•Planners ' 1420 Prx Adence Highway,Suite 117,Nowood,M4 02062 781.255.1982 fax 781.255.1974 6 Blackstone Valley Race,Lincoln,RI 02865 401.333.2382 fax 401 M3.9225 88D HowaM Street,New London,CT 06329 860.437.0239 email:BETAQBETAcng.com JUNE 2008 ' 315 Norwood Park South r i �@rQ0�H0' ��_ Norwood,MA 02062 m e o (781)255-1982,Fax(781)2551974 Engineers . Scientists . Planners - -- -www.BETA-Inc.com June 2, 2008 Massachusetts Executive Office of Environmental Affairs ' MEPA Office 100 Cambridge Street, Suite 900 i Boston, Massachusetts 02114 ' Attn.: Mr. Richard Bourre Acting Director ' Re- City of Salem—Transfer Station Expansion Environmental Notification Form ' Dear Mr. Bourre: Forwarded herewith is the Environmental Notification Form for the referenced project. As discussed, this project is the result of years of negotiations with the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, including various forms of agreements between MA DEP, the City of Salem and Northside Carting, Inc. Currently, there is an amended Administration Consent Order between the three parties that sets forth a schedule for implementation of the landfill closure and expansion of the existing transfer station. Both the City of Salem and Northside Carting are considered proponents of this project. Site Background '- The City of Salem originally constructed a municipal incinerator at the subject site in the early 1960's. It operated for approximately five years before it was taken out of service. During that time, a significant quantity of ash was generated and disposed in a landfill at the site- The site was generally abandoned from 1968 until 1975 when a portion of the incinerator ' building was converted to a transfer station, with permission to operate at up to 50 tons per day. The station was operated for several years by the City and then abandoned in the late 1980s or early 1990's. In 1994, the DEP issued a permit to operate the transfer station at up to 100 tons per day and Northside Carting was selected as operator of the transfer station under a lease arrangement with the City. Northside Carting has been the transfer station operator since that time. In early 2007, the City issued a Request for Proposals to develop the site, giving the respondents significant latitude with respect to the future use of the site, provided that the respondent assume ' the responsibility for closure of the landfill and all associated groundwater monitoring and maintenance of the landfill cap. Two proposals were submitted; both were from respondents who wanted to expand the existing transfer station operations in exchange for closure of the landfill and redevelopment of the site. In the fall of 2007, the City selected Northside Carting for redevelopment of the site, including expansion of the transfer station from 100 to 400 tons per Lincoln,Rl Norwood,MA Rocky Hill,CT ' Mr.Richard Bourre June 2, 2008 Page 2 of 2 day. As part of the purchase and sales arrangement,Northside Carting has agreed to pay the City a host community fee and real estate taxes related to ongoing operation of the transfer station. In addition, Northside will assume responsibility for closure of the landfill, including long term monitoring requirements under the DEP's solid waste management regulations. ' . Environmental Permitting Preliminary engineering related to design of the expanded transfer station and closure of the landfill has been performed and the Notice of Intent was filed with the Salem Conservation Commission earlier this year. An Order of Conditions was issued by the Salem ConComm in ' March 2008. A minor permit modification request is expected to be submitted to the Salem Board of Health later this month. That request will include the various supplemental studies conducted to date that have addressed several concerns that have been raised during meetings with the Board of Health, local residents, the Conservation Commission and others. Specifically, they include the following: ' ➢ Traffic Impact Study; ➢ Draft Air Quality Impact Study; ➢ Noise Study; and ➢ Method 3 Human Health Risk Characterization. Copies of the first three studies are included herewith; the human health risk characterization will be submitted under separate cover later today. MEPA Thresholds The only identified threshold exceeded by the project is the increase in the permitted tonnage rate from 100 to 400 tons per day. Since the original site assignment preceded the current ' permitting process, the project proponents elected to file this ENE for your review. We trust this submission meets you requirements; please call me if you have any questions or need any further information to address public comments. Very truly yours, BETA Group, Inc. Alan D. Hanscom, LSP Senior Associate cc: Beth Rennard, Esq., City Solicitor David Knowlton, City Engineer Robert George, Northside Carting, Inc. li , Office Only Usesa O Commonwealth of Massachusetts axe u,;ve oforrre For Ofof fico nentar lffa s Executive Office of Environmental Affairs i MEPA Office EOEA No.: ' Environmental MEPA Analyst: ENF Notification Form Phone: 617-626- The information requested on this form must be completed to begin MEPA Review in accordance with the provisions of the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act, 301 CMR 11.00. Project Name: Closure of the Salem Landfill and Redevelopment of the Salem Transfer Station Street: 12 Swampscott Road ' Municipality: Salem Watershed- North Coastal Universal Tranverse Mercator Coordinates: Latitude: 42.50031 N 4707125 N, 341759E Lon itude: 70.92581 W Estimated commencement date: Nov. 2008 Estimated completion date: December 2009 Approximate cost: $8,000,000 Status of project design: 50 %complete ' Proponent: City of Salem Street: 93 Washington Street Municipality: Salem State: MA Zi Code: 01970 ' Name of Contact Person From Whom Copies of this ENF May Be Obtained: Alan Hanscom Firm/Agency: BETA roup, Inc. Street: 315 Norwood Park South Municipality: Norwood I State: MA Zi Code: 02062 Phone: (781) 255-1982 Fax: 781) 255-1974 E-mail: AHanscom@BETA-Inc.co ' " Also, Northside Carting, Inc. 210 Holt Road, North Andover Ma, 01845 Does this project meet or exceed a mandatory EIR threshold (see 301 CMR 11.03)? []Yes ®No ' Has this project been filed with MEPA before? Yes (EDEA No. ) ®No Has any project on this site been filed with MEPA before? Yes (EDEA No. ) ®No Is this an Expanded ENF (see 301 CMR 11.05(7)) requesting: a Single EIR? (see 301 CMR 11.06(8)) FlYes ®No ' a Special Review Procedure? (see 301CMR 11 09) nYes ®No a Waiver of mandatory EIR? (see 301 CMR 11.11) E]Yes ®No a Phase I Waiver? (see 301 CMR 11.11) j]Yes ®No ' Identify any financial assistance or land transfer from an agency of the Commonwealth, including the agency name and the amount of funding or land area (in acres): City of Salem to transfer 9.2 acres to Northside Carting, Inc to excharipe for landfill capping, annual host community fees, and real estate taxes. Are you requesting coordinated review with any other federal, state, regional, or local agency? []Yes(Specify,) ®No ' List Local or Federal Permits and Approvals: Waiver of Demolition Delay Ordinance (Salem Historical Commission) ' Building Design Review (Salem Design Review Board) ConComm Order of Conditions issued (3/19/08) Minor Modification to Site Assignment (Salem Board of Health) Rc'ised 10/99 Commem period is limited. For inronnaticn call 617-626-1020 ' Which ENF or EIR review threshold(s) does the project meet or exceed (see 301 CMR ll 03): ❑ Land ❑ Rare Species ❑Wetlands, Waterways, & Tidelands ❑ Water ❑ Wastewater ❑ Transportation ❑ Energy ❑ Air ® Solid & Hazardous Waste (Proposed transfer station expansion exceeds existing ' 100 tpd permit amount by 300 tons) ❑ ACEC ❑ Regulations ❑ Historical &Archaeological Resources Summary of Project Size Existing Change Total State Permits & & Environmental Impacts Approvals LAND ® Order of Conditions- Total site acreage 9.2 ❑ Superseding Order of Conditions New acres of land altered NA' ❑ Chapter 91 License Acres of impervious area 057 o.a6 1.a3 ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification Square feet of new bordering 450' ❑ MHD or MDC Access vegetated wetlands alteration Permit Square feet of new other ❑ Water Management wetland alteration o Act Permit Acres of new non-water ❑ New Source Approval 0 DEP dependent use of tidelands or ❑ Sewer Connection/ waterways Extension Permit ® Other Permits Gross square footage 5500 2000 7500 (including Legislative ' Approvals) — Specify: Number of housing units o 0 0 Maximum height (in feet) 150' 115 35 Minor Modification to Site Assignment 'Issued by Salem onComm on Vehicle trips per day ° 140 54 194 3119108. ' Parking spaces 6 o 6 ' Gallons/day (GPD) of water use GPD water withdrawal GPDwastewater generation/ treatment Length of water/sewer mains ' (in miles) Notes: 1. Fxisting ash landfill to be capped in accordance with MADFP Solid Waste Regulations. ' 2. Approximately 450 S.F. of wetlands to be disturbed during project activities; 1,330 SF to be restored. 3. Existing incinerator stack is approximately 150 feet high. 4. See Traffic Impact and Assessment Study in Attachment J. 2 CONSERVATION LAND: Will the project involve the conversion of public parkland or other Article 97 public natural i resources to any purpose not in accordance with'Article 977 ❑Yes (Specify ) ®No Will it involve the release of any conservation restriction, preservation restriction, agricultural preservation restriction, i or watershed preservation restriction? ❑Yes (Specify ) ®No RARE SPECIES: Does the project site include Estimated Habitat of Rare Species, Vernal Pools, Priority Sites of Rare Species, or Exemplary Natural Communities? ❑Yes (Specify ) ®No iHISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Does the project site include any structure, site or district listed in the State Register of Historic Place or the inventory of Historic and Archaeological Assets of the Commonwealth? ❑Yes (Specify ) ®No If yes, does the project involve any demolition or destruction of any listed or inventoried historic or archaeological resources? i ❑Yes (Specify ) ®No AREAS OF CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN: Is the project in or adjacent to an Area of Critical Environmental Concern? i ❑Yes (Specify ) ®No PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project description should include (a) a description of the project site, (b) a description of both on-site and off-site alternatives and the impacts associated with each alternative, and (c) potential on-site and off-site mitigation measures for each alternative (You may attach one additional page, if necessary.) The project includes both closure of the Salem Landfill and redevelopment of the Salem Transfer Station, including a capacity increase of the transfer station from 100 tons/day to 400 tons/day. The attached locus plan shows the location i of the project site at 12 Swampscott Road, Salem,MA. The proposed project consists the following: Demolition of Existing Building The former incinerator building including the smokestack will be demolished. The construction and demolition debris will be 1 used as backfill for the incinerator building foundation hole and also to re-grade the area surrounding the existing foundation (See DEP Conditional Approval Letter included as Attachment D. Capping of Closed Landfill i The waste at the site consists of ash,C&D Debris,and municipal solid waste. The proposed landfill cap will likely consist of re- grading the existing soil cap to proposed grades, followed by installation of a flexible membrane liner (FML) of HDPE, or equivalent. The FML will be covered by a 12-inch sand drainage layer of topsoil and turf. A geotextile membrane with integral drainage layer may be installed in lieu of the sand drainage layer. After final placement of topsoil and grading to final elevations is completed,the surface of the entire landfill cap will be covered with jute erosion mats held in place with soil nails. An approved meadow and/or slope seed mix will be spread over the upper portions of the cap and a wetland seed mix will be used on the lower, river batik portions of the cap. The contours of the proposed capped landfill will be designed such that slopes to the Forest River will not exceed three feet horizontal by one foot vertical (3:))_ Construction of New Transfer Station Building Construction The proposed new transfer station will include an enclosed metal building on a pile-supported poured-concrete foundation with proposed dimensions of approximately 75 feet by 100 feet. The new building footprint will not exceed by more than 10%the footprint of the current incinerator building, including the stack. The building will be approximately two stories high(35 feet at the eaves). The building will contain two upper level truck bays designed for off-loading(dumping)waste into open top trailers i parked immediately below in the lower level. A 1,500-square foot office and break room will also be included in the building. The construction of this proposed building will be permitted through a minor modification to the existing site assignment for this facility. Repaving ' The driveways associated with the new transfer station will be similar in layout to the existing paved driveways. All existing pavement will be removed and replaced as part of the transfer station upgrade. Additional paved driveways will be added to allow for the smooth flow of truck traffic within the site A portion of the paved area at the transfer station will be used for parking— one area for employee parking and three parking spots for trucks used in the transfer station operations. Operations ' NSC proposes to operate the transfer station at a capacity of 400 tons per day. The waste will consist of construction and demolition debris,municipal solid waste, and commercial solid waste. Relocation of Leaf and Yard Waste Composting/Recycling Area Paving Limited project in accordance with 310 CMR I O.53(3)(e). The current leaf and yard waste composting area is an unpaved handling area that is used only by NSC trucks- In order to make this area useable by resident's automobiles, the travel lanes will be paved to the extent shown"Site Plan—West Side of Forest River" included. The paving will include an access road that will connect the leaf and yard waste composting/recycling area to ' the Transfer Station site, as well as to existing site access and egress points (curb cuts)to Swampscott Road. This access road meets one of the definitions of a limited project, i.e.,"the construction and maintenance of a new roadway or driveway ...where reasonable alternative means of access from a public way to an upland area"of the site is unavailable. ' Concrete Block Push Walls A 22,000+/- square foot area will be graded and leveled for the Yard Waste Drop-Off/Recycling Area A push wall will be constructed of monolithic concrete blocks to facilitate loading of the leaf mulch and yard wastes for off-site transport. Note that the proposed Leaf and Yard Waste Composting/Recycling Area has been situated to minimize the amount of activity within the 100-foot buffer zone. Operation NSC proposes to continue the operation of the leaf and yard waste composting area on a 6-day per week, year round basis. Sunday hours will be added during three week periods in the spring and fall. Leaf and yard wastes will be loaded and shipped from the Site, as required. During periods of heavy usage, the leaf and yard ' wastes may be shipped as frequently as daily. However, during most times of the year, shipments will be on the order of one to four times a month. Site Improvements ' Partial Removal of Forest River Culvert The proposed plan includes the removal of approximately sixty (60) linear feet of the upstream portion of the concrete culvert that conveys the Forest River under the existing access road to the composting area located on the west side of the Site_ The ' material excavated to allow removal of that portion of the culvert will be placed on-site within the limits of the waste and incorporated into the capped portion of the landfill. Before any disturbance of soil and/or waste occurs, a continuous row of staked hay bales and silt fence will be installed along the water's edge. During any excavation along river bank, temporary silt curtains will be installed where the depth of the river makes their use possible. After the culvert removal is completed, the remaining material forming the banks of the Forest River will be landfill solid waste and/or ash and will thus be capped as part of the landfill closure. The pre-capping grade of the waste/ash will be altered such that (1)no slope is steeper than three horizontal to one vertical and (2)sufficient room is created to allow the placement of the landfill cap (proposed to consist of a leveling layer of soil or sand, followed by a flexible membrane liner constructed of HDPE, or equivalent, covered by a sand drainage layer and a 12-inch layer of topsoil and turf). As final grading and placement of topsoil to final elevations is completed, landfill slopes leading down to the Forest River will be covered with jute erosion mats held in place with soil nails. An approved wetland seed mix will be spread over the newly- created landfill.cap. Removal of Debris from the Forest River Visible debris from the Forest River will be removed through the use of an extended boom on an excavator_ The excavator will be located at the top of the embankment,so as to minimize damage during debris removal. The removed material will either be incorporated into the capped portion of the landfill or transported off-site for recycling or disposal. Note: The remaining culvert will be cleaned, inspected and replaced, as deemed necessary by a registered Professional Engineer. Results from the Alternatives Analysis,as submitted with the Notice of Intent dated 2/11/08,are included as Attachment E. LAND SECTION - all proponents must fill out this section I. Thresholds/ Permits A. Does the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to land (see 301 CMR 11.03(1) Yes _X_No, if yes, specify each threshold: II. Impacts and Permits A. Describe, in acres, the current and proposed character of the project site, as follows: Existing Change Total Footprint of buildings 0.126 0.046 0.172 Roadways, parking, and other paved areas 0.6 0.86 1.43 Other altered areas(describe) Undeveloped areas B. Has any part of the project site been in active agricultural use in the last three years? Yes X No, if yes, how many acres of land in agricultural use (with agricultural soils)will be converted to nonagricultural use? ' C. Is any part of the project site currently or proposed to be in active forestry use? Yes X No, if yes, please describe current and proposed forestry activities and indicate whether any part of the site is the subject of a DEM-approved forest management plan: D. Does any part of the project involve conversion of land held for natural resources purposes in accordance with Article 97 of the Amendments to the Constitution of the Commonwealth to any purpose not in accordance with Article 97? Yes X_No; if yes, describe: E. Is any part of the project site currently subject to a conservation restriction, preservation restriction, agricultural preservation restriction or watershed preservation restriction?_Yes X No; if yes,does the project involve the release or modification of such restriction? Yes X No, if yes, describe: F. Does the project require approval of a new urban redevelopment project or a fundamental change in an existing urban redevelopment project under M.G.L.c.121A? Yes X No, if yes, describe: G. Does the project require approval of a new urban renewal plan or a major modification of an existing urban renewal plan under M.G.L.c.121 B? Yes _ No X_; if yes, describe: H. Describe the projects stormwater impacts and, if applicable, measures that the project will take to comply with the standards found in DEP's Stormwater Management Policy: See Stormwater Management Report included as Attachment F. I. Is the project site currently being regulated under M.G.L.c.21 E or the Massachusetts Contingency Plan? Yes No X if yes, what is the Release Tracking Number (RTN)? J. If the project is site is within the Chicopee or Nashua watershed, is it within the Quabbin, Ware,or Wachusett subwatershed?=Yes X_ No; if yes, is the project site subject to regulation under the Watershed Protection Act? Yes No K. Describe the project's other impacts on land: This project will have no adverse impacts on any ' adjacent properties. The portions of the wetland along the Forest River will be temporarily disturbed and then restored during landfill closure activities. An additional 1,330 SF of wetland resource area will be created. III.. Consistency A. Identify the current municipal comprehensive land use plan and the open space plan and describe ' the consistency of the project and its impacts with that plan(s): Being a former ash landfill, it is unlikely that the transfer station will be a part of the current land use plan or the open space plan for the municipality. ' B. Identify the current Regional Policy Plan of the applicable Regional Planning Agency and describe the consistency of the project and its impacts with that plan: Metropolitan Area Planning Council— MetroPlan 2000. The landfill was not taken into account for the current Regional Policy Plan. C. Will the project require any approvals under the local zoning by-law or ordinance (i.e. text or map amendment, special permit, or variance)? Yes X No _ ; if yes, describe: Building height variance is likely to be required. D. Will the project require local site plan or project impact review? X Yes _No, if yes, describe: Notice of Intent filed with Salem Conservation Commission 2/11/08. Two supplements to the NOI I were subsequently filed with Salem Conservation Commission, dated 2/28/08, and 3/13/08. Order of Conditions issued 3/19/08 (See Attachment C). Final design review by City Design Review Board will also be required, prior to issuance of construction permit. RARE SPECIES SECTION 1. Thresholds/Permits 1 A Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to rare species or habitat (see 301 CMR 11.03(2))? _Yes X No, if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to rare species or habitat? _Yes X— No C. If you answered "No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Wetlands,Waterways, and Tidelands Section. If you answered "Yes"to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of III ' the Rare Species section below. It., Impacts and Permits A. Does the project site fall within Priority or Estimated Habitat in the current Massachusetts Natural Heritage Atlas (attach relevant page)? _Yes No. If yes, 1. Which rare species are known to occur within the Priority or Estimated Habitat(contact: Environmental Review, Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program, Route 135, Westborough, MA 01581, allowing 30 days for receipt of information): 2. Have you surveyed the site for rare species? Yes No; if yes, please include the results of your survey. 3. If your project is within Estimated Habitat, have you fled a Notice of Intent or received an Order of Conditions for this project? _Yes_No, if yes, did you send a copy of the Notice of Intent to the Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program, in accordance with the Wetlands Protection Act regulations? _Yes_No B. Will the project"take" an endangered, threatened, and/or species of special concern in accordance with M.G.L. c.131A (see also 321 CMR 10.04)? _Yes _ No, if yes, describe: C. Will the project alter"significant habitat" as designated by the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife in accordance with M.G.L. c.131A (see also 321 CMR 10.30)? _Yes _No; if yes, describe: ' D Describe the project's other impacts on rare species including indirect impacts(for example, stormwater runoff into a wetland known to contain rare species or lighting impacts on rare moth habitat): -6- 1 WETLANDS, WATERWAYS, AND TIDELANDS SECTION 1. Thresholds/Permits A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to wetlands,waterways, and ' tidelands (see 301 CMR 11.03(3))? _Yes X_No, if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits (or a local Order of Conditions) related to wetlands, waterways, or tidelands? X Yes No, if yes, specify which permit: Order of Conditions issued 3/19/08 (See Attachment C). C. If you answered "No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Water Supply Section. If you answered"Yes"to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Wetlands, Waterways, and Tidelands Section below. I II. Wetlands Impacts and Permits A. Describe any wetland resource areas currently existing on the project site and indicate them on the site plan: The delineated wetland areas are located along the Forest River, as shown on the Proposed ' Site Plan in Figure 3. B. Estimate the extent and type of impact that the project will have on wetland resources, and indicate ' whether the impacts are temporary or permanent: Coastal Wetlands Area (in square feet) or Length (in linear feet) Land Under the Ocean Designated Port Areas Coastal Beaches Coastal Dunes Barrier Beaches Coastal Banks Rocky Intertidal Shores Salt Marshes Land Under Salt Ponds Land Containing Shellfish Fish Runs Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage Inland Wetlands Bank 1,200 LF 1 Bordering Vegetated Wetlands 450 SF Land under Water 3.600 SF Isolated Land Subject to Flooding Bordering Land Subject to Flooding Riverfront Area 157,000 SF Total C. Is any part of the project ' 1. a limited project? X Yes _No 2. the construction or alteration of a dam? Yes X No; if yes, describe: 3. fill or structure in a velocity zone or regulatory floodway? _Yes X No 4. dredging or disposal of dredged material? X Yes _No; if yes, describe the volume of t dredged material and the proposed disposal site: Less than 50 CY is estimated to be removed at base of landfill and placed under landfill cap or managed off-Site at an appropriately licensed facility. ' 5. a discharge to Outstanding Resource Waters? — Yes X No 6. subject to a wetlands restriction order? Yes X No, if yes, identify the area (in square feet): 7 D. Does the project require a new or amended Order of Conditions under the Wetlands Protection Act ' (M.G.L. c.131A)? X Yes _No; if yes, has a Notice of Intent been filed or a local Order of Conditions issued?X Yes _No; if yes, list the date and DEP file number:-#064-0473 ' Was the Order of Conditions appealed? _Yes X No. Will the project require a variance from the Wetlands regulations? Yes X No. E. Will the project: ' 1. be subject to a local wetlands ordinance or bylaw? X Yes No 2. alter any federally-protected wetlands not regulated under state—or local law? _Yes X No, if yes, what is the area (in s.f.)? ' F. Describe the project's other impacts on wetlands(including new shading of wetland areas or removal of tree canopy from forested wetlands): Trees and vegetation will be removed Worn the northern side of the Forest River on the property side There will be a restriction on vegetative use due to the landfill cover. III. Waterways and Tidelands Impacts and Permits A. Is any part of the project site waterways or tidelands (including filled former tidelands)that are subject to the Waterways Act, M.G.L.c.91? Yes X No; if yes, is there a current Chapter 91 license or permit affecting the project site? _Yes X No, if yes, list the date and number: B. Does the project require a new or modified license under M.G.L.c.91? _Yes X No; if yes, how many acres of the project site subject to M.G.L.c.91 will be for non-water dependent use? Current _ Change _ Total _ C. Is any part of the project 1. a roadway, bridge, or utility line to or on a barrier beach? Yes X No, if yes, describe: 2. dredging or disposal of dredged material? X Yes _ No; if yes, volume of dredged material <100 CY 3. a solid fill, pile-supported, or bottom-anchored structure in flowed tidelands or other waterways? _Yes X No, if yes, what is the base area? 4, within a Designated Port Area? Yes X No D. Describe the project's other impacts on waterways and tidelands: Removal of bulky wastes from Forest River will have a beneficial impact on the environment. IV. Consistency: A. Is the project located within the Coastal Zone? —Yes X No, if yes, describe the project's consistency with policies of the Office of Coastal Zone Management: B. Is the project located within an area subject to a Municipal Harbor Plan? Yes X No, if yes, ' identify the Municipal Harbor Plan and describe the project's consistency with that plan: ' WATER SUPPLY SECTION I. Thresholds/Permits A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to water supply (see 301 CMR 11.03(4))? Yes X_No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to water supply? _Yes X No; if yes, ' specify which permit: C. If you answered "No" to both questions A and B, proceed to the Wastewater Section. If you ' answered"Yes"to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Water Supply Section below. - 8- ' 11. Impacts and Permits A. Describe, in gallons/day, the volume and source of water use for existing and proposed activities at the project site: Existing Change Total Withdrawal from groundwater Withdrawal from surface water Interbasin transfer Municipal or regional water supply B. If the source is a municipal or regional supply, has the municipality or region indicated that there is adequate capacity in the system to accommodate the project? Yes _No C. If the project involves a new or expanded withdrawal from a groundwater or surface water source, 1. have you submitted a permit application? Yes _ No. if yes, attach the application 2. have you conducted a pump test? _Yes _No, if yes, attach the pump test report ' D. What is the currently permitted withdrawal at the proposed water supply source (in gallons/day)? Will the project require an increase in that withdrawals Yes No E. Does the project site currently contain a water supply well, a drinking water treatment facility,water ' main, or other water supply facility, or will the project involve construction of a new facility? _Yes No. If yes, describe existing and proposed water supply facilities at the project site: Existing Change Total Water supply well(s) (capacity, in gpd) Drinking water treatment plant (capacity, in gpd) Water mains (length, in miles) '- F. If the project involves any interbasin transfer of water, which basins are involved, what is the direction of the transfer, and is the interbasin transfer existing or proposed? G. Does the project involve 1. new water service by a state agency to a municipality or water district? —Yes _No 2. a Watershed Protection Act variance? —Yes _No, if yes, how many acres of alteration? 3. a non-bridged stream crossing 1,000 or less feet upstream of a public surface drinking water supply for purpose of forest harvesting activities? —Yes _No H. Describe the project's other impacts (including indirect impacts) on water resources, quality, facilities and services: I III. Consistency--Describe the project's consistency with water conservation plans or other plans to enhance water resources, quality, facilities and services: -9- 1 WASTEWATER SECTION I. Thresholds I Permits A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to wastewater(see 301 CMR ' 11.03(5))? Yes X No. if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to wastewater? _Yes X No, if yes, specify which permit: ' C. If you answered "No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Transportation --Traffic Generation Section. If you answered"Yes" to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Wastewater Section below. II. Impacts and Permits A. Describe, in gaiions/day, the volume and disposal of wastewater generation for existing and proposed activities at the project site (calculate according to 310 CMR 15.00): Existing Change Total Discharge to groundwater(Title 5) ' Discharge to groundwater(non-Title 5) Discharge to outstanding resource water Discharge to surface water Municipal or regional wastewater facility TOTAL B. Is there sufficient capacity in the existing collection system to accommodate the project? Yes _No, if no, describe where capacity will be found: C. Is there sufficient existing capacity at the proposed wastewater disposal facility?_Yes _No, if no, describe how capacity will be increased: D. Does the project site currently contain a wastewater treatment facility, sewer main, or other wastewater disposal facility, or will the project involve construction of a new facility? _Yes _No. If yes, describe as follows: ' Existing Change Total Wastewater treatment plant(capacity, in gpd) Sewer mains (length, in miles) ' Title 5 systems (capacity, in gpd) E. If the project involves any interbasin transfer of wastewater, which basins are involved, what is the direction of the transfer, and is the interbasin transfer existing or proposed? F. Does the project involve new sewer service by an Agency of the Commonwealth to a municipality or sewer district? Yes No G. Is there any current or proposed facility at the project site for the storage, treatment, processing, I combustion or disposal of sewage sludge, sludge ash, grit, screenings, or other sewage residual materials? Yes No. if yes, what is the capacity (in tons per day): Existing Change Total Storage Treatment, processing Combustion Disposal ' H. Describe the project's other impacts (including indirect impacts) on wastewater generation and treatment facilities: III. Consistency-- Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with federal, state, regional, ' and local plans and policies related to wastewater management: A. If the project requires a sewer extension permit, is that extension included in a comprehensive wastewater management plan? _Yes _No; if yes, indicate the EOFA number for the plan and 1 describe the relationship of the project to the plan to- ' TRANSPORTATION --TRAFFIC GENERATION SECTION 1. Thresholds/Permits A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to traffic generation (see 301 ' CMR 11.03(6))? Yes X No: if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to state-controlled roadways? _Yes X No, if yes, specify which permit: C. If you answered "No" to both questions A and B, proceed to the Roadways and Other Transportation Facilities Section. If you answered "Yes" to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Traffic Generation Section below. It. Traffic Impacts and Permits A. Describe existing and proposed vehicular traffic generated by activities at the project site: Existing Change Total ' Number of parking spaces Number of vehicle trips per day ITE Land Use Code(s): B. What is the estimated average daily traffic on roadways serving the site? ' Roadway Existing Change Total 1. 2. ' 3. C. Describe how the project will affect transit, pedestrian and bicycle transportation facilities and services: III. Consistency -- Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with municipal, regional, state, and federal plans and policies related to traffic, transit, pedestrian and bicycle transportation facilities and services: ROADWAYS AND OTHER TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES SECTION ' I. Thresholds A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to roadways or other transportation facilities (see 301 CMR 11.03(6))? Yes X No, if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to roadways or other transportation facilities? —Yes X No, if yes, specify which permit: C. If you answered "No" to both questions A and B, proceed to the Energy Section. If you answered "Yes" to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Roadways Section below. II. Transportation Facility Impacts A. Describe existing and proposed transportation facilities at the project site: Existing Change Total Length (in linear feet) of new or widened roadway ' Width (in feet) of new or widened roadway Other transportation facilities: B. Will the project involve any ' 1. Alteration of bank or terrain (in linear feet)? 2. Cutting of living public shade trees (number)? 3. Elimination of stone wall (in linear feet)? ' III. Consistency -- Describe the project's consistency with other federal, state, regional, and local plans and policies related to traffic, transit, pedestrian and bicycle transportation facilities and services, including consistency with the applicable regional transportation plan and the Transportation Improvements Plan (TIP), the State Bicycle Plan, and the State Pedestrian Plan: tt - 1 ' ENERGY SECTION I. Thresholds/Permits A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to energy (see 301 CMR 11.03(7))? Yes X No, if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to energy? _Yes X No, if yes, specify which permit: C. If you answered "No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Air Quality Section. If you ' answered "Yes"to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Energy Section below. II. Impacts and Permits ' A. Describe existing and proposed energy generation and transmission facilities at the project site: Existing Change Total Capacity of electric generating facility (megawatts) Length of fuel line(in miles) Length of transmission lines (in miles) Capacity of transmission lines (in kilovolts) ' B. If the project involves construction or expansion of an electric generating facility, what are 1. the facility's current and proposed fuel source(s)? 2. the facility's current and proposed cooling source(s)? ' C. If the project involves construction of an electrical transmission line, will it be located on a new, unused, or abandoned right of way?_Yes No, if yes, please describe: D. Describe the project's other impacts on energy facilities and services: III. Consistency— Describe the project's consistency with state, municipal, regional, and federal plans and policies for enhancing energy facilities and services: AIR QUALITY SECTION 1. Thresholds ' A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to air quality (see 301 CMR 11.03(8))? _Yes X No, if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: ' B. Does the project require any state permits related to air quality? _Yes X_No, if yes, specify which permit: C. If you answered "No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Solid and Hazardous Waste ,- Section. if you answered "Yes"to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Air Quality Section below_ ' 11. Impacts and Permits A. Does the project involve construction or modification of a major stationary source (see 310 CMR 7.00, Appendix A)?_Yes _No; if yes, describe existing and proposed emissions (in tons per day) of: ' Existing Change Total Particulate matter Carbon monoxide Sulfur dioxide Volatile organic compounds Oxides of nitrogen ' Lead Any hazardous air pollutant Carbon dioxide B. Describe the project's other impacts on air resources and air quality, including noise impacts: III. Consistency ' A. Describe the project's consistency with the State Implementation Plan: B. Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with other federal, state, regional, and ' local plans and policies related to air resources and air quality: - 13- 1 " SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION 1. Thresholds I Permits ' A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to solid or hazardous waste (see 301 CMR 11.03(9))? X Yes No. if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: ' B. Does the project require any state permits related to solid and hazardous waste? X Yes No, if yes, specify which permit: C. If you answered "No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Historical and Archaeological Resources Section. If you answered"Yes"to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Solid and Hazardous Waste Section below. II. Impacts and Permits A. Is there any current or proposed facility at the project site for the storage, treatment, processing, combustion or disposal of solid waste? X_Yes _ No, if yes, what is the volume (in tons per day) of the capacity: Existing Change Total Storage Treatment, processing 100 300 400 F Expansion of existing Combustion transfer station Disposal B. Is there any current or proposed facility at the project site for the storage, recycling, treatment or ' disposal of hazardous waste? Yes X No, if yes, what is the volume (in tons or gallons per day) of the capacity: Existing Change Total Storage Recycling Treatment Disposal C. If the project will generate solid waste (for example, during demolition or construction), describe alternatives considered for re-use, recycling, and disposal: The construction and demolition debris will be used as backfill for the incinerator building foundation hole and also to re-grade the area surrounding the existing foundation (See DEP Conditional Approval Letter in Attachment D) D. If the project involves demolition, do any buildings to be demolished contain asbestos? —Yes X No ' E. Describe the project's other solid and hazardous waste impacts (including indirect impacts): III. Consistency--Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with the State Solid Waste Master Plan: The proposed transfer station will promote recvcling by having dedicated recycling areas for residential use. As part of the transfer station operations. the oversight and tracking measures of landfill cap performance and groundwater monitoring will be enhanced. 14- 1 HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES SECTION ' I. Thresholds/ Impacts A. Is any part of the project site a historic structure, or a structure within a historic district, in either case listed in the State Register of Historic Places or the Inventory of Histonc and Archaeological ' Assets of the Commonwealth? Yes X No, if yes, does the project involve the demolition of all or any exterior part of such historic structure? Yes X No. if yes, please describe: B. Is any part of the project site an archaeological site listed in the State Register of Historic Places ' or the Inventory of Historic and Archaeological Assets of the Commonwealth? _Yes No. if yes, does the project involve the destruction of all or any part of such archaeological site? Yes No; if yes, please describe- C. If you answered "No" to all parts of both questions A and B, proceed to the Attachments and ' Certifications Sections. If you answered "Yes' to any part of either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Historical and Archaeological Resources Section below- D. Have you consulted with the Massachusetts Historical Commission? _Yes _No, if yes, attach correspondence E. Describe and assess the project's other impacts, direct and indirect, on listed or inventoried historical and archaeological resources: t II. Consistency—Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with federal, state, regional, and local plans and policies related to preserving historical and archaeological resources: ATTACHMENTS- 1 Plan, at an appropriate scale, of existing conditions of the project site and its immediate context, showing all known structures, roadways and parking lots, rail rights-of-way, wetlands and water ' bodies, wooded areas, farmland, steep slopes, public open spaces, and major utilities. See Figure 2. 2. Plan of proposed conditions upon completion of project(if construction of the project is proposed to be phased, there should be a site plan showing conditions upon the completion of each phase). ' See Figure 3. 3. Original U.S.G.S. map or good quality color copy(8-%x 11 inches or larger) indicating the project location and boundaries. See Figure 1. 4 List of all agencies and persons to whom the proponent circulated the ENF, in accordance with 301 CMR 11.16(2). See Attachment B. 5. Other. -Legal Notice Request ' -Order of Conditions -DEP Conditional Approval Letter 4120105 -Alternatives Analysis -Stormwater Management Plan ' -Photograph Log -Letter from Salem City SOIIICitOr -Additional Information • Supplemental Information to Notice of Intent(2128108) ' Supplemental information to Notice of Intent(3x7108 -Additional Site Plans • Depth of Refuse ' Toe of Landfill Cap Detail -Impact Studies` Vanasse-Traffic Impact Study • Epsilon -Noise Impact Study ' Epsilon-Draft Air Quality Report -Wilcox and Barton - Method 3 Risk Characterization (To be included under separate cover). Impact Studies are included on CD. Hard copies are available at the City of Salem Engineer's Office- ' Hard copies may be requested by contacting Alan D- Hanscom of BETA Group,lnc. ' CERTIFICATIONS: 1. The Public Notice of Environmental Review has been/will be published in the following newspapers in accordance with 301 CMR 11.15(1) (Name) (Date) The Salem News June(, 2008 ' 2 This form has been circulated to Agencies and Persons in accordance with 301 CMR 11.16(2) Project Proponents: Date Sicgnature of Responsible Officer bate Signature of person preparing or Proponent ENF (if different from above) ' Name (print or type): David Knowlton Name (print or type) Alan D. Hanscom ' Firm/Agency: City of Salem Firm/Agency: BETA Group Inc. Street 120 Washington Street Street: 315 Norwood Park South Municipality/State/Zip Salem MA 01970 Municipality/State/Zip: Norwood MA 02446 Phone: (978) 745-9595 Phone: (781) 255-1982 6dD � ' D to ignature sponsi cer or Proponent Name (print or type): Robert George Firm/Agency: Northside Carting Inc. Street 210 Holt Road Municipality/State/Zip: North Andover MA 01845 Phone. (978) 686-2020 16 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS i i ATTACHMENT DESCRIPTION A LEGAL NOTICE REQUEST i B DISTRIBUTION LIST C ORDER OF CONDITIONS i D DEP CONDITIONAL LETTER E ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS i F STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT G PHOTOGRAPH LOG i H LETTER FROM CITY SOLLICITOR I ADDITIONAL INFORMATION i . Supplemental Information to Notice of Intent (2/28/08) Supplemental Information to Notice of Intent (3/7/08) i J PROGRESS SET OF DRAWINGS K IMPACT STUDIES (Included an CD) i . Vanasse —Traffic Impact Study . Epsilon — Noise Study i . Epsilon — Draft Air Quality Report i FIGURES I_ Site Locus 2. Existing Site Conditions i 3. Proposed Site Conditions a. Depth of Refuse s. Toe of Landfill Cap Detail 1 1 1 i � 1 1 1 1 1 FIGURES 1 . 1 1 1 1 1 I �, /I .• � /� , ��,. l.:• :• �; 1 __� .K-'� .tom. sa r4 AtLo. .�� t veli Vl� + -•• �, 'a le �e I�1 The Site � •� '� �'',, � /�� '� ' '� t�, �. 1 1' `f ! • ��r^ � ^Gd1 Co�219p ' c ' �� r 'r�•o � �' \� "�_L �� fir, t� �� r +- t I Group,Inc. Salem Transfer Station ' Engineers -Scientists * Planners 12 Swampscott Road Figure 315 Norwood Park South,Norwood,MA 02062781.255.1982 Salem, Massachusetts email:betafbeta-inc.com r - - 1 1 1 ' 11 COMPOST AREA 11 / 1 1 / 1 1 1 \ L ' f( IIYIIZ ,II jr 1�r�� I SI � ' nli � / � � \ iawn r I D �� [� iYfrµ� \ �� \�`I I �3 iTOry — — _ Jo INCINERATORIa ' I` + x \ dOl .�iwE'co 1 Twm 'm Doi' I , I ar cm SWAMPSCOTT ROAD \ jw Northshls Carting JOB O°70 w For Permitting Transfer Station Design FlIF Ma 4tls P^ Gm 2=rP Y �� Purposes Only Existing Site Plan P"r`� sM¢r BMBMIMB a,oe w s awe w REBAR �— \\ �' NEIN-CONCR �, FND-�WA WITNE le�c by -. SS _ _ - _ _. - 90_ OPOS RI1/ ;;,; =;-!;.I® .13:-------- --------- - -aa ec bvWe� 3 - - so q e L`` N,A �stiN. bvw 7 �� _ __ --RECLAMAT RFa4"---=— w p vw 3 - r p \ c F,R .o 33 bvw-35 w 37_- - bankAF — :..:- book rs_!e bvw 34w- '- �, m d `.\'C _ S'T to bnk W-n` ` __ lee i'6. _ _ fL lea by --� ' by nk' >\\t r, i �eEItfYOR0 w 10 — ^�_� klie ��&w 12 octMf-j C i ea FOREST R bank g wzt T — �o , egPtAc bvw 1 "'3 8 ' "dank ev 7 e i bank \ \ 7 ---'--- - / _ _ Q ' T � 0 ' bank bank p centerline-of. d " ne f t GUARD ala—oad ----- - - - - - ROPE IAWA line Dt ad; "'`' g `STOR TER TRucK II TERCEPTOR � oz -TRUCK CONC 'o I CB o / , r II �� , / / ' ti o — '—�— _ \� \+TSS JR= ' i COp 02 � To u 2 w JI i 4 I, 'ND \ as^.92 EXIST.\ !'� �'• ') / -;�!, , bank1 '' I ' I I \^- ; ``' - -" - _ �, i `�� A�)- r L- '\ ` 't X1,1`�'1;} i I J/ III' ` � ,ii�•' '/ii ,''(. MOU 't \ .1, LJ RI_ •, � , e , J ' .``��T"l— —I TPPINa I !III ONC 'ij ;.r i elr c NF CB I — PROPOSED p � , I � ,TRAN�SfORTv1E j ! TRUCK SCALE I __ _ , / r ' ._, centerlin d}iveway en ranee S2t�r� t/ , " Lnd i' I 00 --- ON o- I '' ' �_ i r \` BLDG T . • _ gpp •, y� I I ae.zs — —— — a BI CONIi f p � P U ' CB — — I—. — — _ 9 CONI PAD & SCALE Z9�� GRAS) ,02.5, ' \ + 7 - - 1 -- \'I2 R AN c 9 LPB CK 98.73 �� CB -, - --- Rer wnu `o� ,4- TRAILER _ e - _ _ _ nta - 0 O — nLn a.zz G sn1 — - - ._97F. , y1 � -,;"C`YBway''_6Atr _._A. . .... �_� _ 8. Y up7w , Ap DMH .r _ .. x. � , o U R=88.50 AIET+LT !'92.94 lb R-95.60 I¢tGP SILTED #4311CO G ! h92 96 96.52 1 , C CUR 90 /MECO j suMPt _ 432 SWA9'k OTT ROAD -- _ PUBLIC No AKp/pp yE OIV /OtlWP01L7.u190 A NRiOeNMM MO € a ROT Ice COMUCTM 3/11/08 ' AD Northside Carting 'WB 7°'e ° For Permitting Transfer Station Design RLE wa SM, �m Purposes Only Proposed Site Plan PM WE mw wee NIItO eIn VR M p61®F pR�p ameC,t610N9 eiv s awo .ms enter TN _ --------- - -— -- - - - _ �.ro2. -- ESS 0 ' ---------------- - - _ �+-+a 0 .,x„ _.-.- "" \ J/6:•.•\ �,` •'` ��,` R` 1 4 / - R M►-+� -r -----" 771 . 5,0 RE �! � -� s FOREST � �o r- RES p testi \\ \1 ^� ` ( I 1I-14 72.8 C 74r �' FO T "i FL'rR 77.7 +1F-Y ' r _ ' whim Lf /• -,. i 20 I I i _ N �I STACK 16 C FORM R 11 CINERAT( R ' \ ; CURRENT WA° E TRANSFEf ONC STATIONES•WA PRO CE SSING 0'CLL w ww w wwww w AR :A i+ � 0�•�'"'---- ;TRAN�SFORKIE W w ww nib G AtL SIDEWn, t w. l0 l f♦ o'kBA ,�## i f OVER G_ \, __--- /./N PIPS __ ,,` - • 3 v I • /-,oisa�'',S,w'=w•�www w�_ FA �'. _ ,'— : / ,� . // ♦ 96 r 98.7 abwelTw i mw'=' \ -fQ,l-1' i e.os e'oN 5, PREVIOUS ;5' .�( MH 96.05_ CONC PAD & SCALE 8' ,02 1 +p� EN _ I ♦� *' — _94.s zs OR GRA x `.oCfl�1R,4�JNG LIMITS �D- .;, ='- 1 1113 ISI R a D N `` _-� f , LPB DE K --I • __ _ RET TRAILER f — — \\ _ * — — — \ l HYp_ -Q-UP- WALL - _ tos.2z i (;A�' x C11R�.. OS U0 LP UP LP I /MECO =98.52 SILTED #43111 i { BIT CO C CURB 4312 $S t SWAMPSCOTT ROAD ' It m* m u "mm m ramsur sear mm eoxsmmis�w � �wueeo roe nrn/Rc mrt UK F ort o+er. nes amrnxs ee vu(reueY sm 15 or a roe mesre/c�a WON m SONE Northside Carting 0B 7070 ' In Transfer Station Design FUND. w 1W .An W.� For Permitting am Purposes Only em m r/m D= ft 100s ' NeG �. NNN NeDmN NlONRw '� °� Depth of Refuse Sar 6 e 9r INS NNs NN fI OI�wYN wNYNY 0:\3400s\3407 - NSC - Salem Transfer Station\ACAD Drawings\Pion Set\Toe of LondFll Cap Detail.dwg Mar 03,2008 1:43pm N PERMEABLE GEOSYNTHETIC FABRIC 3 GEOJUTE FABRIC 1 RIP RAP . . r i- : ;� y�;;, -.;._. ` ✓p GCS.- EASE WATER SURFACE ✓ "''•."%:r .' .i:jIk:S.;: _...z.-6..SC`N.r• NER R 6" yx Q ?'D� 6' SOIL OVER REFUSE IX . �. REFUSE 6.0' IMPERVIOUS LINER y4 NOTE: THIS LANDFILL CAPPING DETAIL SHOWS ONE OF A NUMBER OF LANDFILL CLOSURE OPTIONS ALL WITH THE SAME EQUIVALENT FUNCTIONS. OTHER MATERIALS MAY BE SUBSTITUTED FOR THOSE SHOWN HERE DURING THE FINAL DESIGN PHASE OF THIS TOE OF LANDFILL CAP DETAIL PROJECT. SCALE: t"=2'-0" Group, Inc. E nglneers.Scientists.Planners SALEM TRANSFER STATION Figure No. 1 30 Norwood Perk south SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS TOE OF LANDFILL CAP DETAIL Norwood,MA 02062 761266.1992 smell:8ETA®BETA4m.00m L ATTACHMENT A Legal Notice Request 1 ■ 1 ' Commonwealth ofMassaehusetts Executive Office of Environmental Affairs MEPA Office 100 Cambridge St., Suite 900 Boston, MA 02114 ' Telephone 617-626-1020 ' The following should be completed and submitted to a local newspaper: ' PUBLIC NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROJECT: Salem Landfill Closure and Redevelopment of Transfer Station ' LOCATION: 12 Swampscott Road, Salem, MA PROPONENT: City of Salem 1 The undersigned is submitting an Environmental Notification Form ("ENF") to the Secretary of Environmental Affairs on or before June 2, 2008. This will initiate review of the above project pursuant to the Massachusetts ' Environmental Policy Act("MEPA",M.G.L. c. 30, s.s. 61, 62 62H). Copies of the ENT may be obtained from: ' BETA Group, Inc. 315 Norwood Park South,Norwood, MA Attn: Julie Ritsick (781)255-1982 Ext. 135 Copies of the ENF are also being sent to the Conservation Commission and Planning Board of Salem where they may be inspected. The Secretary of Environmental Affairs will publish notice of the ENF in the Environmental Monitor, will receive public comments on the project for 20 days, and ' will then decide,within ten days, if an environmental Impact Report is needed. A site visit and consultation session on the project may also be scheduled. All persons wishing to comment on the project, or to be notified of a site visit or consultation session, should ' write to the Secretary of Environmental Affairs, 100 Cambridge St., Suite 900, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, Attention: MEPA Office, referencing the above project. By The City of Salem 1 1 1 1 1 ATTACHMENT B ENF Distribution List 1 1 1 1 1 1 ENF Distribution List ' Secretary Ian Bowles Exec. Office of Env. Affairs DEP/Northeast Regional Office Exec. Office of Env. Affairs Undersecretary for Policy Attn: MEPA Coordinator Attn: MEPA Office 100 Cambridge Street, Suite 900 205B Lowell Street ' 100 Cambridge Street, Suite 900 Boston, MA 02114 Boston, MA 02114 Wilmington, MA 01887 ' DEP Commissioner's Office Executive Office of Transportation Massachusetts Highway Department Attn: MEPA Coordinator Attn: Environmental Reviewer Public/Private Development Unit One Winter Street 10 Park Plaza, Room 3510 10 Park Plaza Boston, MA 02108 Boston, MA 02116-3969 Boston, MA 02116 1assachusetts Highway Department Massachusetts Aeronautics Massachusetts Historical District #4, Attn: MEPA Coord. Commission Commission 519 Appleton Street Attn: MEPA Coordinator The MA Archives Building Arlington, MA 02476 10 Park Plaza, Suite 3510 220 Morrissey Boulevard Boston, MA 02116 Boston, MA 02125 ketropolitan Area Planning Council Conservation Commission Salem Board of Health m City of Salem Attn: MEPA Coordinator 02 Boston, MA 02111 ' 60 Temple PlaceFloor 120 Washington Street 120 Washington Street, 4"' Floor Salem, MA 01970 Salem, MA 01970 ' Mass. Bay.Transit Authority Salem City Council Planning Board Attn: MEPA Coordinator Salem City Hall City of Salem ' m 10 Park Plaza, 6 Floor 93 Washington Street Attn: MEPA Coordinator Boston, MA 02216 Salem, MA 01970 120 Washington Street Salem, MA 01970 ' David Knowlton Elizabeth Renard Robert A. George City Engineer City Solicitor Northside Carting, .Inc. City Hall Annex City Hall 120 Washington Street, 4`h Floor 93 Washington Street 210 Holt Road North Andover, MA 01845 Salem, MA 01970 Salem, MA 01970 Lenore White Wetland Strategies, Inc. ' 5 Main Street Ext., Suite 303 Plymouth, MA 02360 1 1 1 r 1 r 1 1 1 ATTACHMENT C ' Order of Conditions r r r r r r r r r r �T �y `gym -� ;- - CITY OF SALEM OONSERVA`I'ION COMMISSION March 19,2008 ' David Knowlton City of Salem Engineering Department ' 120 Washington Street Salem, MA 01970 ' Re: Order of Conditions—DEP#64-473 Salem Transfer Station,12 Swampscott Road, Salem,Massachusetts Dear Mr_ Knowlton: ' Enclosed, please find the Order of Conditions for the above referenced project. Following the 10-day appeal period (as of March 29, 2008), this document and the attached Special Conditions must be recorded at the Essex County Registry of Deeds (36 Federal Street, Salem, MA). Once recorded,please return a copy of Page 9 of the Order, which will indicate to the Commission that the document has been recorded. As indicated in the Order,prior to any work commencing: 1. this Order must be recorded, 2. a sign shall be displayed showing DEP File# 64-473 within public view, and ' 3. contact me at least 48 hours prior to any activity to schedule a pre-construction meeting to review the Order with your hired contractor_ If you have any further questions,please feel free to contact me 978-619-5685. Sincerely, llo�� Carey Dugtres Conservation Agent/ Staff Planner Enclosures CC: Robbie George,Northside Carting, Inc Alan Hanscom, BETA Group, Inc. DEP Northeast Regional Office Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection ' _ f Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands DEP File Number. VVPA Form 5 — Order of Conditions 64-473 ' Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G C. c. 131, §40 A. General Information Important: Salem When filling From: 1.Conservation Commission out forms on ' the computer, 2. This issuance is for(check one)- a. 11 Order of Conditions b. ❑ Amended Order of Conditions use only the tab key to 3 To: Applicant: move your cursor-do not David Knowlton City of Salem and North Side Carting, Into use the return a. First Name b.Last Name provided on attached sheet Key. c.Company 120 Washington Street I� d_Mailing Address Salem MA 01970 e.City/Town E State g.Zip Code a. Property Owner (if different from applicant) The City of Salem ' a.First Name b.Last Name c.Company 120 Washington Street d.Mailing Address Salem MA 01970 1 e. City/Town f.State g.Zip Code 5. Project Location: 12 Swampscott Road Salem a.Street Address b.Cityfrown Map 7 Lot 68 ' c.Assessors Map/Plat Number d.Parcel/Lot Number Latitude and Longitude, if known (note: 42.498960 -70.925349 electronic filers will click for GIS locator): e. LaUnde I. Longitude ' a_ Property recorded at the Registry of Deeds for(attach additional information if more than one parcel): Essex a.County b.Certificate(it registered land) 39004 173 c.Book J. Page February 11, 2008 March 13, 2008 March 19, 2008 7: Dates: a. Date Notice of Intent Filed b-Date Public Hearing Closed c.Date of Issuance ' a. Final Approved Plans and Other Documents (attach additional plan or document references as needed): Site Plan with Sampling Locations a. Plan Title BETA Group Gerard R. Magnan b.Prepared By c.Signed and Stamped by ' February 2008 1"=50' d.Final Revision Date e. Scale See Attached Sheet for listing ' f_Additional Plan or Document Title g.Dale mpolOrtn`_.Nc rev.1vvo5 Page o 9 r Co-Applicant Northside Carting, Inc. 210 Holt Road North Andover, MA 01845 Robert A. Georgie, President ' (978) 686-2020 1 i 1 W IWI M Listing of Approved Plans tinder Order of Conditions for DEP #64-473 Plan Title Prepared By Signed and Stamped By Final Revision Date Scale Wetlands History BETA Group Gerard R. Magnan February 2S, 2005 1"=20' Depth of Refuse BETA Group Gerard R. Magnan February 2005 Not to Scale East Side of Forest River BETA Group Gerard R. Magnan February 28, 2005 1"=20' Overall Site Plan BETA Group Gerard R. :Magnan February 2S, 200S 1"=50' ?407 Details.dwg BETA Group Gerard R. Magnan February 2005 unknown Site Plan BETA Group Gerard R. Magnan February 2008 1"=20' Toe of Landfill Cap Detail BETA Group Gerard R. Magnan February 25, 2005 1"=2' General Site and Exploration Location Plan BETA Group and Gerard R. Magnan No date 1"=40' PARE Engineering Corp Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection ' — Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands DEP File Number: WPA Form 5 — Order of Conditions 64-473 rr - Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 B. Findings t. Findings pursuant to the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act: Following the review of the above-referenced Notice of Intent and based on the information provided in this application and presented at the public hearing, this Commission finds that the areas in which work is proposed is significant to the following interests of the Wetlands Protection Act. Check all that apply: a. ® Public Water Supply b. ❑ Land Containing Shellfish c M Prevention of Pollution d_ ® Private Water Supply e. ® Fisheries f. Z Protection of Wildlife Habitat g. ® Groundwater Supply h. ® Storm Damage Prevention i. ® Flood Control 2. This Commission hereby finds the project, as proposed, is:(check one of the following boxes) Approved subject to: a. ® the following conditions which are necessary in accordance with the performance standards set forth in the wetlands regulations. This Commission orders that all work shall be performed in accordance with the Notice of Intent referenced above, the following General Conditions, and any I other special conditions attached to this Order. To the extent that the following conditions modify or differ from the plans, specifications, or other proposals submitted with the Notice of Intent,these conditions shall control. Denied because: b. ❑ the proposed work cannot be conditioned to meet the performance standards set forth in the wetland regulations. Therefore,work on this project may not go forward unless and until a new Notice of Intent is submitted which provides measures which are adequate to protect these interests, and a final Order of Conditions is issued. A description of the performance standards which the proposed work cannot meet is attached to this Order. 1 c ❑ the information submitted by the applicant is not sufficient to describe the site, the work, or the effect of the work on the interests identified in the Wetlands Protection Act. Therefore, work on this project may not go forward unless and until a revised Notice of Intent is submitted which provides sufficient information and includes measures which are adequate to protect the Act's interests,and a final Order of Conditions is issued. A description of the specific information which is lacking and why it is necessary is attached to this Order as per 310 CMR 10.05(6)(c). Inland Resource Area Impacts: Check all that apply below. (For Approvals Only) 3. ❑ Buffer Zone Impacts: Shortest distance between limit of project disturbance and wetland boundary (if available) a.fnearteet Resource Area Proposed Permitted Proposed Permilted Alteration Alteration Replacement Replacement 1200 _ 1200 1200 1200 4. ® Bank a.linear feet b.linear feet c.linear feet d.linear lout 5. ® Bordering Vegetated 450 450 450 450 Wetland a.square feet b.square feet c.square feet d.square feet 3600 3600 3600 3600 6. ® Land Under Watefbodles a.square feel b.square feet c.square feet d.square feet and Waterways _ e_cu_yd dredged f.cuyd dredged vr`J�C�S.Ccc' rEv.i:llQ$ Pmt 2 Cf Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection I� I Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands DEP File Number. ` NPA Form 5 - Order of Conditions 64-473 Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.Lc. 131, §40 B. Findings (cont.) Resource Area Proposed Permitted Proposed Permitted Alteration Alteration Replacement Replacement 1 7. ❑ Bordenng Land Subject to Flooding a.square feet b.square feet c.square feet d.square feet Cubic Feet Flood Storage - e.cubic feet f.cubic feet g-cubic feet h.cubic feet a. ❑ Isolated Land Subject to Flooding a.square feet b.square feet Cubic Feet Flood Storage c cubic feet d.cubic feet e_cubic feet f.cubic feet 1 157000 157000 s. ® Riverfront area a:total sq.feet b.total sq.feet 000 Sq ft within 100 ft 83000qua ea0ao e sgua f.square c-square feet d.square feet e.square feet f.square feet 74000 74000 74000 74000 Sq It between 100-200 ft g.square fee[ h.square feet i.square feet j.square feet Coastal Resource Area Impacts: Check all that apply below. (For Approvals Only) 10. ❑ Designated Port Areas Indicate size under Land Under the Ocean, below 11. ❑ Land Under the Ocean a.square feet b.square feet c.on yd dredged d.cu-yd dredged 12 ❑ Barrier Beaches Indicate size under Coastal Beaches and/or Coastal Dunes below 13. ❑ Coastal Beaches a-square feet b.square feet c.cly nowishmt. d.c/y nourishmL 14. ❑ Coastal Dunes a.square feet b.square feet c. Jy nriin ohn-t. d_Uy nourishmt 15. ❑ Coastal Banks a.linear feet b.linear feet 16. ❑ Rocky Intertidal Shores a,square feet b.square feet 17. ❑ Salt Marshes a.square feet b.square feet c.square feet d.square feet 18. ❑ Land Under Salt Ponds a.square feet b.square feet c. cu-yd dredged d.cu.yd dredged 1e. [ Land Containing Shellfish a.square feet b.square feet c.square feet d.square feet 20. ❑ Fish Runs Indicate size under Coastal Banks, inland Bank, Land Under the Ocean, and/or inland Land Under Waterbodies and Waterways, above ' a_on yd dredged b.cu Yd dredged 21_ ❑ Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage a_square!eet b.squareleet �' :¢�lamv^_oc- rev.:�l/CS Pdge 3cle 71 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands DEP File Number MPA Form 5 - Order of Conditions 64-473 Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.Gl. c. 131, §40 C. General Conditions Under Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act (only applicable to approved projects) 1. Failure to comply with all conditions stated herein, and with all related statutes and other regulatory measures, shall be deemed cause to revoke or modify this Order. 2. The Order does not grant any property rights or any exclusive privileges, it does not authorize any injury to private property or invasion of private rights. 3. This Order does not relieve the permittee or any other person of the necessity of complying with all 1 other applicable federal, state, or local statutes, ordinances, bylaws, or regulations. 4. The work authorized hereunder shall be completed within three years from the date of this Order ' unless either of the following apply: a. the work is a maintenance dredging project as provided for in the Act; or b. the time for completion has been extended to a specified date more than three years, but less than five years, from the date of issuance. If this Order is intended to be valid for more than three years, the extension date and the special circumstances warranting the extended time period are set forth as a special condition in this Order. ' 5. This Order may be extended by the issuing authority for one or more periods of up to three years each upon application to the issuing authority at least 30 days prior to the expiration date of the Order. 6. Any fill used in connection with this project shall be clean fill.Any fill shall contain no trash, refuse, rubbish, or debris, including but not limited to lumber,bricks, plaster, wire, lath, paper, cardboard, pipe, tires, ashes, refrigerators, motor vehicles, or parts of any of the foregoing. 1 7 This Order is not final until all administrative appeal periods from this Order have elapsed, or if such an appeal has been taken, until all proceedings before the Department have been completed. 8. No work shall be undertaken until the Order has become final and then has been recorded in the ' Registry of Deeds or the Land Court for the district in which the land is located, within the chain of title of the affected property. In the case of recorded land, the Final Order shall also be noted in the Registry's Grantor Index under the name of the owner of the land upon which the proposed work is to ' be done. In the case of the registered land, the Final Order shall also be noted on the Land Court Certificate of Title of the owner of the land upon which the proposed work is done.The recording information shall be submitted to this Conservation Commission on the form at the end of this Order, which form must be stamped by the Registry of Deeds, prior to the commencement of work. 9. A sign shall be displayed at the site not less then two square feet or more than three square feet in size bearing the words, I "Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection" [or, "MA DEP"j "File Number 64-473 " 1,-S do,- re,. 3M03 P;,a of 9 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection 17 Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands DEP File Number: ' WPA Form 5 — Order of Conditions 64-473 Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L- c. 131, §40" C. General Conditions Under Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act 10. Where the Department of Environmental Protection is requested to issue a Superseding Order, the Conservation Commission shall be a party to all agency proceedings and hearings before DEP. 1 1 Upon completion of the work described herein, the applicant shall submit a Request for Certificate of Compliance (WPA Form 8A) to the Conservation Commission. 12. The work shall conform to the plans and special conditions referenced in this order. 13. Any change to the plans identified in Condition#12 above shall require the applicant to inquire of the Conservation Commission in writing whether the change is significant enough to require the Filing of a ' new Notice of Intent. 14. The Agent or members of the Conservation Commission and the Department of Environmental ' Protection shall have the right to enter and inspect the area subject to this Order at reasonable hours to evaluate compliance with the conditions stated in this Order, and may require the submittal of any data deemed necessary by the Conservation Commission or Department for that evaluation. ' 15. This Order of Conditions shall apply to any successor in interest or successor in control of the property subject to this Order and to any contractor or other person performing work conditioned by this Order. ' 16. Prior to the start of work, and if the project involves work adjacent to a Bordering Vegetated Wetland, the boundary of the wetland in the vicinity of the proposed work area shall be marked by wooden stakes or flagging. Once in place, the wetland boundary markers shall be maintained until a Certificate of Compliance has been issued by the Conservation Commission. 17. All sedimentation barriers shall be maintained in good repair until all disturbed areas have been fully ' stabilized with vegetation or other means. At no time shall sediments be deposited in a wetland or water body. During construction, the applicant or his/her designee shall inspect the erosion controls on a daily basis and shall remove accumulated sediments as needed.The applicant shall immediately control any erosion problems that occur at the site and shall also immediately notify the Conservation Commission, which reserves the right to require additional erosion and/or damage prevention controls ' it may deem necessary. Sedimentation barriers shall serve as the limit of work unless another limit of work line has been approved by this Order. 18. All work associated with this Order is required to comply with the Massachusetts Stormwater Policy Standards. Special Conditions: If you need more space for additional conditions, select box to attach a tenter document -- I ' "rnt.'m i.1- 'e 3/1,05 PmeSrr- Massachusetts uepartment of tnvironnnentat rrotecnon - DEP File Number: Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands WPA Form 5 - Order of Conditions 64-473 Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 D. Findings Under Municipal Wetlands Bylaw or Ordinance t. Is a municipal wetlands bylaw or ordinance applicable? ® Yes ❑ No 2. The hereby finds (check one that applies): ' Conservation Commission 3. ❑ that the proposed work cannot be conditioned to meet the standards set forth in a municipal ordinance or bylaw specifically: a. Municipal Ordinance or Bylaw b.citation Therefore,work on this project may not go forward unless and until a revised Notice of Intent is ' submitted which provides measures which are adequate to meet these standards, and a final Order of Conditions is issued. 4. ❑ that the following additional conditions are necessary to comply with a municipal ordinance or bylaw: a. Municipal Ordinance or Bylaw b.Citation The Commission orders that all work shall be performed in accordance with the following conditions and with the Notice of Intent referenced above.To the extent that the following conditions modify or differ from the plans, specifications,or other proposals submitted with the Notice of Intent,the conditions shall control. it you need more space for c- The special conditions relating to municipal ordinance or bylaw are as follows: additional The special conditions attached to this Order of Conditions relate to both the City of Salem's local conditions, select box to ordinance and the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act. attach a text document 1 .. ' oG��m mS occ- rev.3N05 Pqe 6ot9 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection DEP File Number: 7L_� Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands WPA Form 5 - Order of Conditions 64-473 Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 E. Issuance This Order is valid for three years, unless otherwise specified as a special condition pursuant to General Conditions 94, from the date of issuance. 1.D to df Issuance Please indicate the number of members who will sign this form: 4 (four) This Order must be signed by a majority of the Conservation Commission. 2.Number of Signets The Order must be mailed by certified mail (return receipt requested)or hand delivered to the applicant. A copy also must be mailed or hand delivered at the same time to the appropriate Department of Environmental Protection Regional Office, if not filing electronically, and the property owner, if different from applicant. Signatures: l Notary Acknowledgement Commonwealth of Massachusetts County of Essex 1 On this 13 March 2008 . Day �f Month Year Before me, the undersigned Notary Public, K. Cornacchio, D. Pabich, M. Blier, K. Glidden personally appeared Name of Document Signer Iproved to me through satisfactory evidence of identification,which was/were personally known ' Description of evidence of identification to be the person whose name is signed on the preceding or attached document, and acknowledged to me that he/she signed it voluntarily for its stated purpose. As member of SalemclryrTown Conservation Commission CAREY A DUOPubic S Pubic a r�a�uens aN camumm Erp4» ' MpuY 16.$g9 Signature ,f Notary Public U Carey _ Duques Printed Name of Notary Public August 16 Place notary seal and/or any stamp above s2013 My Commission Expires(Date) This Order is issued to the applicant as follows . ' ❑ by hand delivery on by certified mail, return receipt requested, ori Date Dale woatotm5 eoc rev.3/1105 e+@e 7 et 9 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection I Lr - Bureau of Resource Protection -WetlandsDEP File Number; WPA Form 5 — Order of Conditions 64-473 -- Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 F. Appeals The applicant, the owner, any person aggrieved by this Order, any owner of land abutting the land subject to this Order, or any ten residents of the city or town in which such land is located, are hereby notified of their right to request the appropriate DEP Regional Office to issue a Superseding Order of Conditions. ' The request must be made by certified mail or hand delivery to the Department, with the appropriate filing fee and a completed Request of Departmental Action Fee Transmittal Form, as provided in 310 CMR 10.03(7)within ten business days from the date of issuance of this Order.A copy of the request shall at the same time be sent by certified mail or hand delivery to the Conservation Commission and to the applicant, if he/she is not the appellant.Any appellants seeking to appeal the Department's Superseding Order associated with this appeal will be required to demonstrate prior participation in the review of this project. Previous participation in the permit proceeding means the submission of written information to the ' Conservation Commission prior to the close of the public hearing, requesting a Superseding Order or Determination, or providing written information to the Department prior to issuance of a Superseding Order or Determination. The request shall state clearly and concisely the objections to the Order which is being appealed and how the Order does not contribute to the protection of the interests identified in the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act, (M.G.L_c. 131, §40) and is inconsistent with the wetlands regulations (310 CMR 10.00). ' To the extent that the Order is based on a municipal ordinance or bylaw, and not on the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act or regulations, the Department has no appellate jurisdiction. ' Section G, Recording Information is available on the following page. a:paloim5 aec e..YvpS Ppe B d 9 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection ' DEP Fife Number. Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands WPA Form 5 — Order of Conditions 64-473 ' Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 G. Recording Information ' This Order of Conditions must be recorded in the Registry of Deeds or the Land Court for the district in which the land is located, within the chain of title of the affected property. In the case of recorded land, the Final Order shall also be noted in the Registry's Grantor Index under the name of the owner of the land ' subject to the Order. In the case of registered land, this Order shall also be noted on the Land Court Certificate of Title of the owner of the land subject to the Order of Conditions.The recording information on Page 7 of this form shall be submitted to the Conservation Commission listed below. Salem Conservation Commission Detach on dotted line,have stamped by the Registry of Deeds and submit to the Conservation Commission. To: Salem Conservation Commission Please be advised that the Order of Conditions for the Project at: 1 12 Swampscott Road 64-473 Project Location DEP File Number Has been recorded at the Registry of Deeds of: ' County Book Page for: ' Property Owner and has been noted in the chain of title of the affected property in: Book Page ' In accordance with the Order of Conditions issued on: Date If recorded land, the instrument number identifying this transaction is: ' Instrument Number ' If registered land, the document number identifying this transaction is: 6 Document Number Signature of Applicant ' v.palom5 doc rev.3Nn5 Pie g or 4 1 Attachment to Order of Condmons p 6,1-473 ' C Page lof 7 ' SALEM CONSERVATION COMMISSION DEP FILE R 64-473 ' City of Salem Transfer Station 12 Swampscott Road City of Salem,Massachusetts ADDITIONAL FINDINGS Based on the Estimated Habitats or Rare Wildlife and Certified Vernal Pools Map (June 1, 2003) Eom Natural ' Heritage & Endangered Species Program (NHESP) of the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, it has been determined that this project does not occur near any habitat of state-listed rare wildlife species nor contains any venial pools. ' This Order is issued under the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act,M.G.L_Chapter 131,Section 40 and the City of Salem Wetlands Protection Ordinance,Salem Code Chapter 34,Section 34-1 —34-13. ' This Order permits the capping and renovation (including slope stabilization, repaving, grading) of the existing City of Salem transfer station and upgrade of City of Salem yard waste drop-off area (installation of retaining walls and repaving) at the closed solid waste landfill. In further detail,this Order of Conditions permits the work proposed in ' the Notice of Intent filed with the Conservation Commission on February 11, ?008 which is firfber described in supplemental information provided to the Conservation Commission on February 28, 2008 and March 13, 2008. The activities approved under this Order of Conditions include demolition of the existing former incinerator 1 building,including the building and the smoke stack. The Corrunission approves the demolition procedure proposed in the application. The applicant shall obtain all necessary local and state permits necessary to complete this demolition. This Order permits the capping of the landfill as described in the Notice of Intent application. The Commission approves this plan so long as it is in compliance with DEP's regulations. If changes are made to the proposed capping techriblue the landowner shall provide the Conservation Commission with the new proposed approach to capping the landfill. The Convmission approves the construction of a new transfer station building to be 75 feet by 100 feet,as proposed in the Notice of Intent application. This Order permits repaving on the Site including areas within the 200 foot Riverfiont area. In order to address runoff and reduce the total suspended solids entering into the river the landowner shall install a Stonnceptor 900i unit, per DEP comments made on March 4, 2008. In order to control ' stormwater during construction the landowner shall provide a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan(SNVPPP) to the appropriate agencies and provide the Conservation Commission with a copy. This Or permits the development of concrete block push walls and retaining walls within the Riverfrout area as proposed on the Overall Site Plan dated February 2008 stamped by Gerald R. Magnan. This project proposal includes the relocation of the yard waste drop-off area and the creation of a recyclable drop-off area to the rear ' (southern) pcniam of the site The Conservation Conunission is requiring that no dtnmping signs be installed along the perimeter of the drop-off area and along the top of the river. Condition #46 outlines the specifics of design, quantity and location of the signs. This Order permits the creation of a water quality swale around the perimeterof tie drop-off area as described in the Notice of Intent application. ibis Order permits site improvements, specifically the removal of approximately 60 linear feet of the upstream porion of a cubed drat currently coneys the Forest River under the existing access road to the yard waste drop-off area located to the rear, southern,side of the Site_ This Order permits the removal of the 48"and die installation of a nuacnment to ureter or wrrwuuru n un -t/j ' Page 2of 7 12" pipe at inlet to control flow and maintain existing conditions. All material removed as a result of the day- lighting of the river shall be handled appropriately according to DEP requirements. The river shall be protected ' throughout the entire process of removing the 60 linear feet, taking necessary precautions to limit sediment, egwpment, etc. from entering the river. Final stamped plans showing the removal of the pipe shall be submitted to the Conservation Agent on-Conservation Commission prior to the start of construction and post the inspection or the dainage pipe_ The landowner shall remove debris from the Forest River, including but not limited to"white goods"such as washing machines, dryers, bicycles,etc. Equipment used to remove this debris shall not enter the river and spill kits shall be on Site at all times. An Operations and Maintenance Plan shall be maintained on site by the landowner and shall be available for review by the Conservation Agent or others who are interested. The Conservation Agent will be inspecting the site on a weekly basis during construction. The Conservation Agent ' shall be notified if changes are made to any section of the approved application. ' GENERA-.CONDITIONS 1. This Order of Conditions must be recorded in its entirety (all 7 pages) at the Essex County Registry of Deeds or the Land Court for the district in which the land is located, after the expiration of the 10-day appeal period and within 30 days of the issuance. A copy of the recording information must be submitted to the Salem Conservation Commission before any work approved in this Order commences_ ' 2. Approval of this application does not constitute compliance with any law or regulation other than M.G.L Chapter 131, Section 40,Wetlands Regulations 310 CMR 10.00 and the City of Salem Wetlands ' Protection Ordinance, Salem Code Chapter 34,Section 34-1 -34-13. 3. All work shall be performed in accordance with this Order of Conditions and approved site plan(s). No ' alteration of wetland resource areas or associated buffer zones, other than that approved in this Order, shall occur on this property without prior approval from the Commission. ' 4. Prior to any work commencing, a sign shall be displayed showing DEP Tile#61-473, and not placed on a living tree. No work approved in this Order may commence until the ten(10)day appeal period has lapsed from the date of the issuance of this Order. 6. With respect to this Order, the Commission designates the Conservation Agent as its agent with powers to act on its behalf in administering and enforcing this Order. 7. The Commission or its Agent, officers,or employees shall have the right to enter and inspect the property at ' any time for compliance with the conditions of this Order,the Wetlands Protection Act MGL Chapter 131, Section 40,the Wetlands Regulations 310 CNIR 10.00, and the Salem Wetlands Ordinance,and shall have the right to require any data or documentation that it deems necessary for that evaluation. ' S. The term"Applicant" as used in this Order of Conditions shall refer to the owner, any successor in interest or successor in control of the property referenced in the Notice of intent, supporting doctunenis 1 and this Order of Conditions. The Commission shall be notified in �vnting within 30 days of all 1 Attachment to Order of Conditions N 64-x}73 p Page 3of 7 ' transfers of title of any portion of the property that takes place prior to issuance of the Certificate of Compliance. ' 9. It is the responsibility of the applicant to procure all other applicable federal, state and local permits and approvals associated with this project. These permits may include but are not necessarily limited to the following (1) Section 404 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (P.L. 92-500, 86 stat. 816),U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. ' (2) Water Quality Certification in accordance with the Federal Water Pollution Control under authority of sec. 27(5)of Chapter 21 of the Massachusetts General Laws as codified in 314 CMR 9.00. (3) Sewer Extension Permit from the DEP Division of Water Pollution Control under G.L. Ch. 21A ss7 ' and 314 CMR 7.00. Any Board of Health permit for septic system design for any portion of the septic system within 100 feet of wetlands shall be submitted to the Commission prior to construction initiation. (4) Design Requirements for Construction in Floodplains under the State Building Code(780 CMR 744.). ' 10. If there are conflicting conditions within this Order,the stricter condition(s) shall rule. 11. All work shall be performed so as to ensure that there will be no sedimentation into wetlands and surface waters during construction or after completion of the project. 12. The Commission or its Agent shall have the discretion to modify the erosion siltation control methods and boundary during construction if necessary. ' 13. The Commission reserves the right to impose additional conditions on portions of this project or this site to mitigate any actual or potential impacts resulting from the work herein penrufted. ' 14. The work shall conform to the following attached plans and special conditions: Final Approved Plans ' See Attached Sheet for a Listing of all Plans (7-itle) ' (Dated) (Signed and Stamped by) City of Salem Conservation Commission ' (Oa file ivith) li- Any proposed changes in the approved plan(s) or any deviation in construction from the approved plan(s) shall require the applicant to file a Notice of Project Chance with the Commission. The Notice shall be accompanied by a written inquiry prior to their implementation in the field,as to whether the ciiange(s) is substantial enough to require filing a new Notice of Intent or a request to correct or amend ' this Order of Conditions. A copy of such request shall at the same time be sent to the Deparnnent of Emrironmental Protection. 1 Attachment tO Vraer OI t_onainons 7i bi-9/) Page 4of 7 ' 16. In conjunction with the sale of this property or any portion thereof before a Certificate of Compliance has been issued, the applicant or current landowner shall submit to the Commission a statement signed by the ' buyer that lie/she is aware of an outstanding Order of Conditions on the property and has received a copy of [lie Order of Conditions. ' 17. Condition Number 50 and 51 as indicated shall continue in force beyond the Certificate of Compliance, in perpetuity,and shall be referenced to in all future deeds to this property. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION 18. Prior to the commencement of any activity on this site other than activities listed above;there shall be a Pre-Construction Meeting between the project supervisor,the contractor responsible for the work, and a member of the Conservation Commission or its Administrator to ensure that the requirements of the Order of Conditions are understood. The staked erosion control line shall be adjusted, if necessary,during the pre-construction meeting. Please contact the Conservation Commission Agent at (978) 619-5685 at least forty-eight (48)hours prior to any activity to arrange for the pre- constriction meeting. ' 19. Prior to the pre-construction meeting and commencement of any activity on this site,sedimentation and erosion control barriers shall be installed as shown on the approval plan(s)and detail drawings. The ' Comm scion and/or its Adm nistrator shall inspect and approve such installation at the pre-construction meeting. 20. No clearing o`i vegetation,including trees,or disturbance of soil shall occur prior to the pre-construction ' meeting. Minimal disturbance of shrubs and herbaceous plants shall be allowed prior to the pre- construction meeting if absolutely necessary in order to place erosion control stakes where required. ' 21. There shall be twenty (20)hay bales and wooden stakes under cover on the site to be used only for emergency erosion control. EROSION CONTROL ' 22. Appropriate erosion control devices shall be in place prior to the beginning of any phase of construction, and shall be maintained during construction in the wetland areas and buffer zones. The erosion control specifications provided in the Notice of Intent and the erosion control provision in the Order will be the minimum standards for this project-,the Commission may require additional measures. 23. All debris, fill and excavated material shall be stockpiled a location far enough away from the wetland ' resource areas to prevent sediment from entering wetland resource areas. 24. Erosion and sedimentation control devices shall be inspected after each storm event and repaired or ' replaced as necessary. Any accumulated silt adjacent to the barriers shall be removed. 25. The area of construction shall remain in a stable condition at the close of each construction da,,- ' 26. Any de-wolerine of trenches or other excavation required during construction shall be conducted so as to prevent siltation of wctland resource areas. All discharge from de-watering acuvnnes shall be filtered through hay bale sediment traps, silt filter bags or other means approved by the Commission: or its Administrator. 27- within tmrr- (30) days of completion of construction on any given portion of the project, all dismrbed areas in the completed portion of the site shall be permanently stabilized with rapidly growing vegerative cover, using sufficient top soil to assure Ion.--term stabilization of disturued areas. - - rinacnmem io vraer or k-onaruons n uY-t/j Page So{ 7 ' 28. If soils are to be disturbed for longer that two (2) months, a temporary cover of rye or other grass should be established to prevent erosion and sedimentation. If the season is not appropriate for plant growth, exposed surface shall be stabilized by other appropriate erosion control measures, firmly anchored, to prevent soils from being washed by ram or flooding. ' DURING CONSTRUCTION 29. A copy of this Order of Conditions and the plan(s) approved in this Order shall be available on site at all times when work is in progress. 30. No alteration or activity shall occur beyond the limit of work as defined by the siltation barriers shown on the approved plan(s). 31. All waste products,grubbed stumps,slash-,construction materials,etc. shall be deposited at least 100 feet from wetland resource areas and 200 feet from river. 32. Cement trucks shall not be washed out in any wetland resource or buffer zone area,nor into any drainage system. Any deposit of cement or concrete products into a buffer zone or wetland resource area shall be ' immediately removed. 33. All exposed sub-soils shall be covered by a minimum of three(3)inches of quality screened loam topsoil prior to seeding and final stabilization- 3 tabilization. 3I. Immediately folloNving drainage stricture installation all inlets shall be protected by silt fence,haybale barriers and/or silt bags to filter silt from stormwater before it enters the drainage system. ' 35. There shall be no pumping of water from wetland resource areas. 36. All equipment shall be inspected regularly for leaks. Any leaking hydraulic lines,cylinders or any other ' components shall be fixed inunediately. 37. During construction, all drainage structures shall be inspected regularly and cleaned as necessary. 3S. The applicant is herby notified that failure to comply with all requirements herein may result in the issuance of enforcement actions by the Conservation Commission including,but not limited to,civil admimstrative penalties under M.G.L Chapter 21 A, section 16. AFTER CONSTRUCTION 39. Upon completion of constriction and final soil stabilization, the applicant shall submit the following to the Conservation Conunission to request a Certificate of Compliance (COC): (1) A Completed Request for a Certificate of Compliance form (WPA Form 3A or other form if' required by the Conservation Commission at the time of request). (2) A letter from a Registered Professional Engineer certifying compliance of the property with this ' Order of Conditions. (3) An "As-Built" plan signed and stamped by a Registered Professional Engineer or Land Surveyor showing post-constniction conditions within all areas under thejurisdiction of the Massachusetts ' Wetlands Protection Act. This plan shall include at a minimum: (a) All wetland resource area boundaries with associated buffer zones and regulatory setback ' areas taken from the plan(s)approved in this Order of Conditions: - - tutacnmenr [o vruer vi wuwuuiu � u�-�... ' Page hof 7 ' (b) Locations and elevations of all stormwater management conveyances,structures and best management designs, including foundation drains,constructed under this Order within any wetland resource area or buffer zone, (c) Distances from any structures constructed under this Order to wetland resource areas- "stmctures"include,but are not limited to,all buildings,septic system components,wells, ' utility lines, fences,retaining walls,and roads/driveways; (d) A line delineating the limit of work-"work" includes any filling,excavating and/or disturbance of soils or vegetation approved under this Order; ' 40. When issued, the Certificate of Compliance must be recorded at the Essex County Registry of Deeds and a copy of the recording submitted to the Salem Conservation Commission. ' 1. If the completed work differs from that in the original plans and conditions, the report must specify how the work differs; at which time the applicant shall first request a modification to the Order. Only upon review and approval by the Commission, may the applicant request in writing a Certificate of ' Compliance as described above. 42. Erosion control devices shall remain in place and properly functioning until all exposed soils have been ' stabilized with final vegetative cover and the Conservation Commission and/or its Administrator has authorized their removal. ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS 43. The applicant shall obtain all necessary state and local permits prior to demolition occurring on site- ' The Conservation Commission shall receive copies of these permits. 44. Final plans outlining the partial removal of the Forest River Culvert shall be submitted to the ' Conservation Agent and approved before construction on this portion of the project can begin. The plans shall contain, elevation of culvert project area post construction,exact length of culvert to be removed,location of erosion control measures to be installed during construction, identification of area where material excavated will be placed, dewatering plan (if necessary),restoration plan proposed for the river banks, and details of cement headwall to be placed on inlet end of culvert. 45. The applicant shall remove debris from the Forest River. Excavators or other equipment used to remove ' debris from the river shall not enter the river. Spill kits shall be on Site. 46. The applicant shall coordinate with the Conservation Agent regarding the layout, wording, design, quantity, etc of no dumping signs to be installed adjacent to resource area and in the rear, southern, ' portion of Site near the recycling and yard waste drop-off area. 4T The applicant shall submit letter from adjacent property owner agreeing to be an applicant on the Notice of Intent. 4S. The applicant shall submit letter from adjacent property owner granting a construction easement over the property owned by NSSS Limited Partnership located at 38-52 Swampscott Road in Salem,NIA or ' documentation proving the conveyance of the property to the applicant prior to start of construction. 49. The Conservation Commission shall be copied on all documents submitted to the DEP and other state ' agencies. 50. The applicant shall provide the Conservation Agent with hydrologic caiculations,pie and post removal of the 60 feet of culvert_ Final plans for the headwall and any structure to be installed at the upstream L L UaLMIIellt LU V1LLn Vi winm wi>J n - i _ Page 7of 7 inlet of the Forest River shall also be submitted for review and final approval by the Conservation Agent or Conservation Commission and City Engineer. 51. The applicant shall update the Operations and Maintenance manual prior to starting construction to reflect quarterly street sweeping and supplemental sweeping as necessary. ' S2. Tlie applicant shall update the Operations and Maintenance manual prior to starting construction to reflect inspections of catch basins quarterly and annual cleaning of the catch basins with supplemental cleaning as necessary. ' 53. Applicant shall update plan showing Toe of Landfill Cap Detail with rip rap covering the impervious liner above and below the water surface. ' 54. Applicant shall submit annual report by December 31 of each year to the Conservation Agent showing that the catch basins have been cleaned and street sweeping has occurred. 55. The applicant shall install four (4) foot sumps in each of the catch basins located on site. ' 56. Applicant shall complete and submit a stormwater report meeting DEP standards prior to performing construction. ' 57. Site visits shall be conducted weekly by the Conservation Agent upon the start of construction. 58. Applicant shall note on site plans snow storage areas. 59. Applicant shall appear before the Conservation Commission with final plans stamped by an engineer upon submitting plans to DEP and prior to beginning construction. PERPETUAL CONDITIONS 60. The applicant shall maintain an Operations and Maintenance Manual for the stormwater system that is accessible on Site. ' 61. Sodium based products shall not be used within the Riverfront Area, 200 feet from the river. Listing of Approved Plans.under Order of Conditions for DEP #64-473 Pre ared By Signed and Stamped By Final Revision Date Scale Plan Title P Februar 28, 2008 1 '=20' wetlands History BETA Group Gerard R. Magnan y Gerard R. Magian February 2008 Not to Scale Dcpth of Refuse BETA Group Febmary 28, 2008 1"=20' Fast Side of Forest River BETA Group Gerard R. Magnan February 28, 2008 1"=50' overall Site Plan BETA Group Gerard R. Magnan February 2008 unknown 3407 Details.dwg BETA Group Gerard R. Magnan February 2008 1"=20' Site Plan BETA Group Gerard R. Magnan February 28 2008 1"=2' Toe of Landfill Cap Detail BETA Group Gerard R. Magnan General Site and Exploration No date l"=40' Location Plan BETA Group and Gerard R. Magian PARE Engineering Corp 1 I ATTACHMENT D DEP Conditional Letter 1 . COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTm OFFICE OF ENviRoNMENTAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT OF.EN iRoNMENTAL PROTECTION METROPOLITAN BOSTON-NORTHEAST REGIONALOFFICE .-:MITT ROMNEY ELLEN ROY BERZFELDER ' Governor: - - _ Secretary: r%ERRy u>,Ar>,v - :ROBERT W.'GOILEDGE,:Jr; - 'TaeutenantGovernor - - Commissioner- '. . .. .. ;, . .. Bruce Thibodcau - - (Pll - _ City of Salem ' Department of Public Works 120 Washington Street - Salem,MA 01970 ' RE: SALEM-Solid Waste Salem Landfill - :Corrective Actions.Alternatives Analysis`s• - '- Conditional Approval - - ' File#W062414 Facility#39974 ' Dear Mr.TbibodeaD: The Metropolitan Boston/Northeast Region of the:Department of Environmental protection,Division:of Solid Waste Management has received;your application for approval of the Corrective Action Alternatives Analysis (CAAA)for closure of the Salem Landfill,.SwampscottRoad,'Salem,Massachusetts(BWP.SW 24 Corrective Action Alternative Analysis,Transmittal Number W062414). The application was prepared on your.bebalfby ' BETA Group,-Inc.,Norwood,Massachusetts The recommended alternative provides for: - - - - - - ' 1. .Demolition of the existing transfer station(former incinerator)and replacement with anew structure designed foruse as.a.transferstation. - 2. Excavation of construction&demolition waste from the culverted crossing of Forest River with ' reconstruction of the culvert and crossing. C&D materials are to be disposed of within the existing landfill. 3. Excavation of waste(ash and MSW),from along Forest River with.relocation of the waste to withigthe existing.landfill. The finished slope:along Forest River will be gradedata slope of 3 horizontal to 1 vertical(3:1,a33%grade)...... - 4. Construction of a new-retaming wall in the vicinity of the existing transfer station(incinerator) building to facilitate relocationof.the waste materials(ash,MSW and C&D)while retaining the ' - - necessary separation,of grades between--.the front and rear of.the.new transfer station building. 5. Capping of thewastematerials with:6 flexible membrane liner(FML)cap. 6. The finished grade of the capped landfill will have a minimum gradient of 5%. - 7. Construction of a new salt shed west of Forest River. 1 This informadon is avaaable in alternate format Call Donald M.Gomes,ADA Coordinntar,nt 1-617556-1057.TDD Service-3-800.29&2207. 3eFloor,One Winter Street,Boston,MA 02708•Phone(617)6546500•Fax(517)556-1049•iDD S(800)298-2207 DEP on the World Wide Web: http://w -state.ma.us/dep L� Printed an Recycled Paper ' Salem Page 2 Salem Landfill Corrective Action Alternative Analysis ...t. .. ., _.. _. Condi- "I .pproval ' As described in the application,the C&D materials from the demolition of the existing transfer station (incinerator)building will be used as backfill for the building foundation. The Department concurs that the C&D materials-both from demolition of the existing building and from relocation of materials from the culvert area- may be used to backfill the building foundation hole and re-grade the area around the existing foundation. ' The application proposes to effect the use of the C&D debris as backfill pursuant to a Beneficial Use Determination(a BUD,310 CMR 19.060). The Department has determined that a BUD is not the appropriate ' mechanism for the effecting the use of the C&D as proposed by this project. In consideration of the origin and character of the C&D debris,the debris must be placed as part of the waste materials in the landfill,and the landfill cap extended to include the transfer station foundation. The Department will entertain disposal of the C&D ' materials in this manner as an integral component of the site remediation and landfill closure design. Based on the site use history and the soil conditions identified by the Comprehensive Site Assessment (CSA),the Department has determined that the construction of the salt shed does not require Department approval. ' The Department approves the CAAA and concurs with the selection of Option 4 for the design of closure of the landfill subject to the following conditions: ' 1. The closure design shall: a. Extend the limits of the cap to cover the C&D waste materials. In accomplishing this ' extension of the cap,either the 1:"MI,may be extended under the new building with the FML and related layers designed to accommodate the loads,or the building foundation shall be integrated into the impervious layer of the cap. i b. Design the new building foundation to protect the building and its occupants from explosive gases. 2. The Corrective Action Design(CAD,i.e.the closure plans)application shall be signed by the appropriate official of the City of Salem. Reports,plans,etc.,shall be signed and sealed by the engineer of record. Each shall include certification pursuant to 310 CMR 19.011,as required. ' 3. The Department reserves the right to amend,modify,suspend or revoke this approval as necessary to protect the public health, safety or the environment, or as otherwise necessary to insure compliance with applicable law and/or regulation. 4. The City shall obtain and comply with the requirements of all applicable state,federal and local laws, regulations, and permits. Concurrently with submitting the CAD application the City shall submit documentation that the applications for such other permits and approvals as may be required have been applied for. ' S. In consideration of the commercial operating nature of the transfer station by Northside Carting Inc. and the interdependence of the reconstruction of the transfer station on the couective action ' design,the Department's review of the CAD shall not be subject to the exemption from application i fees granted to municipalities. The application shall be subject to payment of the applicable fees iI for privately owned/operated facilities as established at 310 CMR 4.00. 1 6. The Department reserves the option to requireNorthsideCarting,Inc,to obtain a permit,issued to Northside Carting,Inc.,for future operation of the facility,and/or otherwise pay an annual compliance fee as applicable to privately operated facilities. s1f50412aov.doc 04/12/05 ` ' Salem - - Page 3 - - Salem Landfill - - Corrective Action Alternative Analysis Conditional Approval _ 1 .Y NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL The City of Salem(the"City")is hereby notified that if may within twenty-one(21)days filem request that this , decision be deemed a provisional decision under 310 CMR 19.037(4)(b),by submitting a written statement of the basis m on which the City believes it is aggrieved,together with any supporting materials. Upon timely filing of such a request, the decision shall be deemed a provisional decision with an effective date twenty-one(21) days after the Department's ,- receipt of the request. Such a request shall reopen the administrative record, and the Department may rescind, 'supplement,modify, or reaffirm its decision. Failure by the City to exercise the right provided in this section shall constitute a waiver of the City'sright to appeaL - - ' Appeal. Any person aggrieved by the issuanceofthis decision, except as provided for under 310 CMR ..19.037(4)(b),may file an appeal for judicial review of said decision in accordance with the provisions of M.G.L.c.111, s.150A,and M.G.L.c.30A,not later than thirty(30)days following the receipt of the final decision.The standing of.a — personto file an appeal and the procedures for filing such appeal shall be governed by the provisions of M.G.L.c..30A. _ t ,Unless the person requesting an appeal requests and is granted a stay of the terms and conditions of the decision by a court of competent jurisdiction,the decision shall remain effective. - Notice of Action. .Any aggrieved person intending to appeal thisdecisionto the Superior Court shall first - - provide notice to the Department of their intention to commence such action. Said notice of intention shall include the Department file number and shall identify with particularity the issues and reasons why it is believed the decision was - ' not proper. Such notice shall be provided to the Office of General Counsel of the Department and the Regional Director, for the regional office which processed the application. The appropriate addresses to which to send such notices are: General Counsel _ .. Department of Environmental Protection One Winter Street-3rd Floor - - - - Boston,MA 02108 ' Regional Director - _ - ' Department of Environmental Protection NERO One Winter Street-5th Floor Boston,MA 02108 ' No allegation shall be made in any judicial appeal of this decision unless the matter complained.of was raised at the appropriate point in the administrative review procedures established in those regulations,provided that a matter may ' be raised upon a showing that it is material and that it was not reasonably possible with due diligence to have been raised during such procedures or that matter sought to be raised is of critical importance to the environmental impact of the permitted activity. The Department reminds you that pursuant to the Administrative Consent Order(ACOP-NE-0I-4005),the City was required to complete closure of the landfill by November 1,2004. On October 28,2004 the Department forwarded to the City; via your consultant, BETA Group; an agreement forextensionof the ACOP to November 1, 2005 for _ completion of the closure of the landfill. The City has not executed that extension. The Department will entertain discussion to reasonable extension of the ACOP deadlines. However, it is necessary that the City submit, within twenty-one (21) days of this notice,to the Department a schedule for completion of the project design(the Corrective Action Design[CAD])and constuction ofthe landfill closure: s150512sov.doc - - 04/12/05 ' Salem - Page 4 Salem Landfill Corrective Action Altemative Analysis Conditional Approval ' Should you have any questions concerning this matter,please contact David Adams at 617-654-6677. ' Sincerely, - Smcerel David C.Adams 7obnA.Carrigan ' Environmental Engineer Section Chief Solid Waste Management Solid Waste Management 7AC/DCA/dca ' enclosure:Fact Sheet ' cc: Salem Board of Health ' Salem,MA jscott@salem.com Alan D.Hanscom,PE ' BETA Group,Inc: 315 Norwood Park South Norwood,MA 02062 ' Robert George Northside Carting,Inc. 12 Swampscott Road - - ' Salem,MA 01970 . 1 1 s1f50412apv.doc 04/12/05 I ' FACT SHEET File Number:W062414 Salem Landfill&Transfer Station " Page 1 of 4" Corrective Actions Alternatives Analysis Facility ID ' Applicant:. City of Salem Department of Public Works 120 Washington Street ' Salem,MA 01970 Operator: Northside Carting,Inc. 12 Swampscott Road. ' Salem,MA 01970 Facility:. Salem Landfill and Transfer Station ' address: 12 Swampscott Road Salem,MA 01970 ' ID: Facility Number:39974 ' Regulated ObjectNumber:368468 Solid Waste ID Number: SL0258.001 Solid Waste Permit Number:none. Type of facility: inactive landfill and active transfer station Waste Type: landfill: ash from combustion"of Municipal Solid Waste(MSV), and t Municipal Solid Waste transfer station: Construction&Demolition(C&D)waste Current Application ' Type: Corrective.Action Altemafive Analysis (BWPSW24) Transmittal Number:W062414 Date:March 29,.2005: ' Received:March 31,.2005, Signed by Town:not signed ' Engineer of Record: BETA Group,Inc. 315 Norwood Park South ' Norwood,MA 02062 Alan D.Hanscom PE MEPA: MEPA Thresholds not triggered ' s130409ts.doc 04/14/05 - ' FACT SHEET File Number:W062414 Salem Landfill&Transfer Station Page 2 of 4 Corrective-Actions Alternatives Analysis Size: total site: 9.2 acres landfill: not provided ' Other Department Approvals Effecting this Application: Administrative Consent Order ' ACOP-NE-01-4005 effective date:April 4,2002 amended:negotiation pending ' Comprehensive Site Assessment File Number:W044286 approved:March 2,2004 ' Submissions with this Application: report ' City of Salem,Massachusetts Corrective Action Alternative Analysis . Salem Landfill ' 12 Swampscott Road Salem,Massachusetts March 2005 Discussion: ' Pursuant to 310 CMR 19.011 and 19.030(10 & 11)a"responsible official" of the applicant(the City of Salem)is required to sign the application. The City has not signed ' the Corrective Action Alternative Analysis (CAAA) application. In consideration of the need to proceed to design of this project and the degree of conformity of the selected option to a standard design,the Department has elected to waive the signatory ' requirement for this application. It will be necessary that the appropriate "responsible official" of the City of Salem sign the application for review of the Corrective Action Design. ' The CAAA reviews 5 options. The first 2 options ([Option 1] the need for"more stringent closure actions than defined in 310 CMR 19.112 and [Option 2] the ability to ' allow a"less stringent closure actions"than defined in 310 CMR 19.112) and the"no ' s1f50409fs'dnc - 04/14/05 - ' FACT SHEET File Number: W062414 . Salem Landfill &Transfer Station Page 3 o 4' Corrective Actions Alternatives Analysis - build" option [Option 5] are only summarily described and examined. The focus of the report is a"standard"option [Option 31 and a."modified" option[Option 4]. ' m Options 2 and 5 are rejected as not meeting the goals of the regulatory standards for landfill closures. ' Option 1 is rejected as the results of the Comprehensive Site Assessment(CSA) did not indicate aneed. The City's engineers recommend the selection.of Option 4 for the.closure of the landfill. Under Option 3: * The existing landfill would be capped with a low permeability soil or FML cap. * All waste would be retained within the existing waste limits. * The River.Front of the Forest River would be remediated by: i. excavating the waste from the edge of the river, ii. constructing a concrete bin type retaining wall along the edge of ' the river, iii. backfilling the retaining wall with the excavated waste. This option would not make any changes to the existing transfer station or other ' improvements to the site outside of the existing limits waste. Option 3 describes using an FML to construct the cap along the slopes facing the river. As described the FNII,would be placed at a gradient of 3:1, and excavated waste would be "stored"behind a retaining wall constructed next to:the river.. :The Department, assumes it is meant that the excavated waste will be used as permanent bac1C611 behind the retainingmall: . ' The described River Front remediation would result in waste materials being placed above the cap. This element of the design does not comply with minnrial requirements for the capping of the waste material. However,the design is amenable to alteration to correct this, deficiency. Under Option 4 the landfill would be capped with a low permeability soil or FML cap as ' . included at Option I In addition: * The old incinerator building(of which part is used as the existing transfer ' station)would be razed. ' slfi0409is.doc _ 04114/05 - 1 FACT SHEET File Number:W062414 Salem Landfill & Transfer Station Page 4 of 4 Corrective Actions Alternatives Analysis ' * The River Front of the Forest River would be remediated by excavating waste from along the river and regarding the landfill slope' (currently ' varying from 1:1 to 2:1)to a gradient of 3:1. * Forest River will be further remediated by removal of the C&D waste materials from the area of the culvert and reconstructing the river crossing with clean fill. * The C&D debris from razing the incinerator, along with the waste excavated from the River Front would be used to backfill the area of the ' incinerator building. A new transfer station,with access driveways and aprons,would be constructed. * A new salt shed would be constructed on the portion of the property on the opposite side of the Forest River(the area currently used for the Town's leaf&yard waste composting area.). ' As proposed the new building would retain the same setback from the street side property line as the current building(circa 40 feet). ' Option.4 proposes to use the C&D debris and excavated waste as fill under the new. transfer station pursuant to a Beneficial Use Determination(BUD). This type of approval willnot likely be appropriate. However, the design will likely be amenable to extension ' of the waste area and cap to beneath the new transfer station building. option 4 includes construction of a new salt shed on the property. As identified in the ' plans available at this time,the area where the salt shed is proposed has not been used for solid waste(ash,MSV) disposal. The area is currently being used for leaf&yard waste composting-an activity exempt pursuant to 310 CMR 16.05(4)(b). As described in the ' CSA and noted on the plan included with the CAAA,waste disposal at the site was limited principally to the portion of the site east of Forest River. Some construction& demolition waste(C&D debris) disposal also occurred within the immediate vicinity of t the Forest River as part of establishing access across the Forest River to the portion of the . west of the river- an approximately 160 foot reach of the river was placed into a culvert and the river channel at the culvert was filled with C&D debris materials. The Department, therefore, deems the portion of the site west of the Forest River(not including the area of C&D disposal)to be a separate and distinct area from the waste ' disposal area of the site. Therefore,the area where the salt shed is to be located is not subject to review and approval as a post closure use for the purpose of constructing a salt ! shed as proposed. ' 'Run(horizontal)to rise(vertical). i ' s160404fs.dm 04/14/05 I� 1 r 1 r 1 ATTACHMENT E ' Alternatives Analysis 1 1 r r r r ' Nmwc ofMwm 12 S.vompsmtt Rood, Salem,MA Feb.,11.2008 In accordance with 310 CMR 10.58(4),BETA has performed the following Alternatives Analysis with respect to the performance standards at 310 CMR 10.58(4)(a)through(d): ➢ Protection of Other Resource Areas 10.58(4)(a) The project will not result in any filling or dredging of the bordering vegetative wetland or any bordering land subject to flooding and, therefore, meets this performance standard. However, minor temporary alteration of the wetland resource area(450+/- square feet)will be required to accommodate installation of the landfill cap. For mitigation, at the Commission's option, we propose to eliminate the 60+/-foot upstream section of the existing culvert, thereby creating approximately 600 square feet of resource area to compensate for the temporary alteration of the river's edge during construction of the cap. ➢ Protection of Rare Species 10.58(4)(b) The Site has not been identified as the habitat of any rare species and, therefore, meets this performance standard. 1 ➢ Practicable and Substantially Equivalent Economic Analysis 10.58(4)(c) The Site is an existing landfill that is required to be closed under MassDEP Solid Waste Regulations at 310 CMR 19.00. The City of Salem has entered into an Administrative Consent Order with MassDEP which provides for certain deadlines to be met to achieve closure. There are no viable alternatives to closure of the landfill. In addition,the site has a Site Assignment under DEP Solid waste regulations and a minor modification to the Site Assignment will be submitted to the Board of Health. No other site in Salem is currently permitted to serve as a transfer station. �� ➢ No Significant Adverse Impact 10.58(4)(d) The purposes of the work proposed under this NO] are as follows: To terminate current composting operations within the Riverfront Area; To complete the required landfill closure in accordance with applicable state regulations; To replace the existing incinerator building (retrofitted for use as a transfer station)with a new transfer station;and • To install new recycling and yard waste composting facilities for use by residents of the City of Salem. By achieving these purposes, the project will have a netosp itive impact on the nverfront area. The proposed construction will include landfill capping and slope r Notice oflntent 12.Si ootpscou Rand, Salem,MA Rbnmry ll,2008 stabilization provisions that will substantially reduce the current landfill leachate(storm water infiltrating through the landfill) entering the Forest River, site erosion and ongoing siltation of the river. In addition,wastes and debris currently located along the river's edge will be removed and incorporated into closure of the landfill. All of these 1 activities will result in a significant improvement in the water quality of the Forest River at and downstream of the Site. In order to minimize the impact of the work to the wetlands and riverfront, the Applicants propose to remove the upstream portion of the existing culvert so that approximately 60 linear feet of the river is returned to open channel flow. All slopes along the river will be stabilized with dumped rip-rap and, if necessary, geotextile fabric and stone for stability. In addition, the yard waste drop-off and recycling area has been located as far away from the resource areas as possible. N1 M- Mrar-Tran The following site-specific information is provided to show that the riverfront area of the Site will not have an adverse effect on the following interests: ➢ Private or Public Water Supplies There are no public water supplies within the City of Salem.The water supply for the City of Salem is provided from surface water reservoirs operated by the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority, none of whose reservoirs are located in the City of Salem. No private water supplies are know to exist within a half- mile radius if the Site. Therefore, it is BETA's opinion that the proposed project will not have an adverse effect on this interest. ➢ Groundwater BETA has reviewed the on-line MassGIS Priority Resource Map which shows that the site is not within or within the vicinity of a mapped Zone Il or interim wellhead protection area, productive or potentially productive aquifer, or other area indicating the current or future potential use of the Site as a groundwater A supply. Therefore,it is BETA's opinion that the proposed project will not have an adverse effect on this interest. ➢ Flood Control BETA has reviewed the August 15, 1985 Flood Insurance Rate Map published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency National Flood Insurance Program. Map number 250102 0005 B shows the site and area within at least a 2,000-foot radius to be in Zone C — an area of minimal flooding. On the basis of this 2 ' Notice oflm,nt 12 Saampsemt Road, Salem,MA Febn,.,11,2003 classification, it is BETA's opinion that the proposed project will not have an adverse effect on this interest. Also note that the proposed design of the landfill cap includes the removal of ' visible waste material within the river. The purpose of this removal is to enhance the aesthetics of the river and to increase the stability at the toe of the landfill cap. The effect of the removal of this material, along with removal of the upsteam portion of the existing culvert, will result in a slight increase in flood storage capacity at the Site. Careful consideration will also be given to clearing the existing culvert of obstructions. Currently, due to debris accumulation, the culvert appears to be serving as a controlled orifice outlet for the upstream reach of the river. The obstructed culvert appears to effectively attenuate peak rates of storm water runoff to downstream areas. ➢ Land Containing Shellfish The Site is approximately two miles from the Atlantic Ocean. Surface water at the Site consists of a very small river (Forest River) and a portion of an associated unnamed pond. Neither of these surface water bodies are tidally influenced or support any shellfish. Therefore, it is BETA's opinion that the proposed project will not have an adverse effect on this interest. The remaining interests may be affected by the proposed project: Pollution Prevention; • Prevention of storm damage, • Fisheries;and Wildlife habitat. For each of these interests, BETA presents the evidence in the following sections that I there are no practicable and substantially equivalent economic alternatives to the proposed project with less adverse effects on the (remaining] interests listed in M.G_L. c.131 § 40 (i.e., flood control, prevention of storm damage, prevention of pollution, and wildlife habitat) and that the work, including proposed mitigation, will have no significant adverse impact on the riverfront area to protect the interests identified in I —3 r Am"t offowof 12 Swampscott Road, Salem,MA February 11,7008 M.G.L. c.131 § 40. I ➢ Prevent Pollution Approximately 60%of the Site is located within the Riverfront Area of the Forest River. The Site contains an operating transfer station. The purpose of the work proposed to be performed under the anticipated OOC will result in the minimization of leachate entering the Forest River (by capping), mitigation of 1 debris currently in the river(by its removal),and reduction of siltation and erosion into the river (by the capping and slope stabilization). Each of these proposed activities will result in an improvement in the water quality of the Forest River at the Site. It is BETA'S opinion that the work will have no adverse impact on the riverfront area's ability to protect the interest of pollution prevention identified in M.G.L. c.131 § 40. Conversely, completion of the work proposed under this NOI will significantly curtail leachate migration to the Forest River and greatly enhance the interest of pollution prevention. ➢ Prevent Storm Damage For similar reasons to those described above, the permanent closure of the existing landfill and the rehabilitation of the transfer station activities will improve Site conditions including the prevention of storm damage. Currently, portions of the Site have minimal or no vegetative cover and erosion of Site soil and/or waste into the Forest River may be occurring during storm events. The presence of a properly capped and vegetated landfill cover will prevent such erosion, and act to absorb stormwater, minimizing direct overland flow of stormwaler into the river. Wildlife Habitat In addition to the environmental improvements to the Forest River and its banks described above, the project will provide a permanent cap to the solid waste and ash currently in-place at the Site. The cap will be finished with topsoil and seeded with a meadow seed mix. The presence of the cap will prevent exposure to the waste and ash and substitute grass and other low, shallow-rooted vegetation for the exposed soil and brush currently at the site. It is BETA'S opinion that the work will have no significant adverse impact on the riverfront area's ability to protect the interest of wildlife habitat identified in M.G.L. c.131 § 40. In fact, completion of the work proposed under this NO] will likely increase the ability of the riverfront area at the Site to protect the interest of wildlife. It is BETA's 4 i ' Norice Jlnrenr 12 Summp.0 Road, Salem,MA Febniory ll,2008 experience that capped landfills provide habitat for numerous plant and animal species including birds and small ground animals. These species typically will return or expand their habitat into a capped landfill shortly after the completion of construction. ➢ Fisheries The Site is approximately two miles from the Atlantic Ocean. Surface water at the Site is at an elevation of approximately 70 feet above sea level and consists of a small river (Forest River) and a portion of an associated unnamed pond. Neither of these surface water bodies is tidally influenced. According to the October 4, 2001 USGS quadrangle for the area, the Forest River flows into Thompson's Meadow approximately '/-mile southeast of the Site before discharging onto Salem Harbor.No river channel is shown within Thompson's Meadow. As previously described, the presence of the cap will prevent exposure to the waste and ash and will greatly reduce runoff from the landfill into the Forest 1 River. It is BETA'S opinion that the work will have no significant adverse impact on the Forest River and will likely increase the ability of the riverfront area to protect the interest of fisheries identified in M.G.L. c.131 §40. r 1 —5 ' Invoice ' PRECISION Date Invoice# D A T A INDUMIES,ILC 5/12/2008 81582 Raao 301 Bedtr,,MP 01503 Offke 508.0813999 Far:WB545.1334 ' EmalkCab,Muesuf^VdTcmm Bill To BETA Group Inc 6 Blackstone Valley Place Lincoln,RI 02865 1 ' Engineer Client Job# Terms Job Location J-Mvabito 3622 2%10 Net 60 Fairhaven,MA Description Hours/Quantity Rate Amount (11)7m-7pm TMCs Wed 517 thin Thurs 5/6108 132 60.00 7,920.00 (12)48 FIR ATRs(Volume)Wed 517 thin Thurs 5/8108 12 200.00 2,400.00 (1)7-9am/46pm TMC Wed 5/7108 4 65.00 260.00 ,,TE REC: APROJECT #: TASK#: ' 1 PM APPROVAL: 1 "Traffic Counts with Precision"Thank you for yom business Total $10,580.00 Balance Due $10,580.00 i 1 1 1 1 i . 1 1 ATTACHMENT F Stormwater Management Report 1 1 1 1 i 1 i i i 1 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT CLOSURE OF THE SALEM LANDFILL AND REDEVELOPMENT OF THE SALEM TRANSFER STATION ' SWAMPSCOTT ROAD SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS ' Applicants: CITY OF SALEM, MA 93 Washington Street Salem,MA 01970 NORTHSIDE CARTING, INC. 210 Holt Road ' North Andover,MA 01845 ' I BETA Group,Inc. r Engineers•Scientists•Planners 315140 x ed Pa*South,No-1 MA 02062 781255.1982 lax'.781.255.1974 ' 6 Bla&stm Valley Plr w.Lim ln.RI 02865 x01,333 2382 lax'.401 333.9225 750 CId Main Street,Rocky Hill,CT 06057 8°6.513.1503 email:BETA@BETAtinc.c,m March 2008 1 1 rOBJECTIVE OF CALCULATIONS This calculation is an analysis of the site hydrology and stormwater runoff for the ' Existing Conditions Case and the Proposed Conditions Case. The objective of this analysis is to show that the net peak rate and volume of stormwater discharge from ' the site in the Proposed Conditions will be equal to or less than the discharge under the Existing Conditions for the two, ten, and one hundred year rainfall events. r Accordingly, development of the site as it pertains to stormwater runoff will not adversely impact adjacent or downgradient properties. rCALCULATION METHODS AND ASSUMPTIONS r Stormwater runoff is analyzed using the following: • "HydroCADT" Stormwater Modeling System," by Applied Microcomputer Systems based upon SCS Technical Releases No. 55 and 20 for generating ' hydraulic calculations including peak flows and runoff volumes. • Rational Method (Q = CIA) used to size pipes for the 10 year storm. r EQUATIONS AND SOURCES OF DATA USED ' • Q = 1.486(A)/n(R)2/3(S)1/2 - Manning's Equation for Rational Method 24 Hour Rainfall data-Technical Release No. 40. r2 yr= 3.10 in. 10 yr=4.55 in. 100 yr = 6.50 in • Soils information from the Middlesex County from the Natural Resources r Conservation Service (NRCS) formally SCS. Soils within the construction limits is predominately Hinckley, loamy sand within the A hydraulic group. 1 POINT OF ANALYSIS r This entire project site is located within the Forest River watershed. The analysis rpoint is the river. 1 z r r r PROJECT DESCRIPTION ' The proposed project includes demolishing the incinerator building, capping the ' landfill, building a new transfer station, paving access drives, loading and parking areas. It also includes constructing an area to allow for yard waste transfer. ' For the land fill site, stormwater will be collected in a system of catchbasins and pipes, routed through a water quality unit (Stormceptor) to obtain 80% TSS removal and be discharged to the Forest River. For the yard waste transfer site, the entire area will be surrounded by a vegetated treatment swale. Stormwater will sheet flow off pavement areas and be collected, treated and infiltrate in the swale. This will mitigate the impacts associated with the addition of impervious area. Standards for peak rate of runoff, infiltrations and water quality will be met with the design as proposed. COMMENTS AND CONCLUSIONS ' This analysis has demonstrated that there will be no measurable increase in peak ' rate of stormwater runoff or stormwater runoff volume due to the proposed development of this site. The proposed stormwater management system has been designed in accordance with DEP's Stormwater Management Policy and will be a ' significant improvement over the existing condition. ' Although any site construction can impact local hydrology and water quality, the plans as presented incorporate many design features intended to mitigate adverse ' effects to downgradient wetlands and aquifers. ' 3 i ATTACHMENT G ' Photograph Log 1 i GoMPOSS \� ' PRE P ' \ a LEGEND: \ / PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION REFERENCE � / a \ NSF I ' CITY OF SALEM -__Zoe MAP 7 PARCEL 68 / \ 9.20 ACRES - _._.____. -------------- ----------- ._ "_ __ ._. __..____.. 11 I I r y `� " `_ •• -_ _ _ _ -�`!' 1'''�11111 II',rl 'll�l,F1'Ill,lO'I �r0 - - _ _ __ - - _ _ B _-------------- --------------------------------.. ____.. __ •" -./ ll�,B�r1,11�1�, Ir1�l,Il 1, 'i l�il�i '. WE 19 -------------------------------- I -- ___ _--__--- - -- . II /lll,,llII,1l jll rl,l�,l1, - �J ..___\>•• ,'-• •- •_----_ - -_ ':-'..��"i rl x�ll�'Y'l1f If If % y,{ll,l_Ill,ll, ,l ll~,1II 11,`N�4R/1Il l' ly• � --------------- --__ _..-' �..---\• _ 'I:S.YII,•. ^J�ml.''II,II,IIIII/ ,, ,I ,r ,l,l'Ill,/..% 6� 'ii 3n A \ ______•:_ ___------------- C If I�,��(.1;:- WF 816 If REBAR.__. \�, ,__._____.._ _______ __ j��'��Qj��1 �'•_____PWTINE __ ___ __ -��;�%,�rl�' lll�m�l'I^,y ll�l l''l --------------- •�-� - _ ___ O4l) •L'.,' ,ill��^!I,^ 1,'ll, IIII'�'✓2I1/ ,'.�.,�-.. MAP 7 PARCEL 66 ::WF:yi4:,• --___- �:7- ,r'. _ _ s r�t�" _ - - _ 0 ] / 10.2 ACRES _____._::::_. .-.r.. .r ' rel l r ,r / I I ,II I ,l III P -'C;'•_;;::,',;i, 12 '•, —._— _____ 1 . ' _ __ ____.__ - 16 .., % Til - _ M ,I ,I _ _ - -- _ Ar ,l 11 ,rl,l , ,r 11l',l',l',Il r',��',r',I',1 ,,,1',11/I; I VJ• — � �........1.. WT B1J__•-: r r Il I I'd ,Bl klGif;_ ----------- I"I", _ ,I l ,l , ,I , ,I II II I' l rill 1 I , , ,1 , : " �> CONG.[GRAN PILE ___ _._ - .I,.I,��l',Ilr',I rll ,r IIII lr ,l ,ll,ll,IllI ,II,II,ll,ll, ,ll,ll,,l,lI,II III II I,/, DRAINAGE l I I, ,l 'll, II�Ly/(4r r11,,,{,�l I'll-Iylf,ll r',r ,l rl,r r'lI I' I' I',l 1I /' 1��11 /I l., >� STRB'CTURE • 9D I l r I I'I", PIS ' 'P '' 1, I' , ,l l' lI Il,yt...:_YI -_�___,_•yt .,; /II/I,11,ll,IIII l R4IS ,'1• I (r1IIlI//' '.l! = )^'B�i t4' I,IIIA, 1, ,111/III(� _ - --------------- <1 _ •-,, •; Qom...••-: ';�;.:' �'i- Y 111,I,III IS I',l'I11,IIII %/I'/I'/I 1, 'l.l r ____________________ _ _ ••SMCG STA MS n 111 Ir1l l',I ,r ,r ,l ,r ,l' I1 I1 ,1 11�..<ii�.:C :I_ :: - RK 6•E1.' , l ll'Il1/Il'''lI 111r'11 I�',lI111�]_;�-5,'' N 101]09.4 /� %,Ilr/l,/lll,illlr,/II/,II,III III,I,I,./;,..',.. .]::.. E' 8'215.67 N/' ,l ,rl,ll,rl,11 SMC BTA ,tl8 _ _ __ ____ _ 99 P P E1EY�BL5P FEET ,' ROYAL ORDER MA AR �IIAL ,E-49391GI \ BIT CONC y:1 PKSETA W "I" I,r'/III,'I I,I'/r ,l'Y'!""••,�, :QELEV=66.50 FEET PK SET Il 11 rl ,' , ,l l ll,l/,r ISS;; '- __ BIT CONC N 101088.86 '�,III'III,/�//I,��I�,I 11 7:, _______ _______ __ _ __ _ __[" - L- __ - - E D948].92 ELEV-60.48 FEET - ,, �p SB/DH I I I l , I / / i 11/lf, I;' E%IST., FIND SfAGK IIII _ O ' ll� l I I - SMO STA BI I' f OR A I t' SE I PK i / T i � � I - t RA - / E .. 8 s 0 - 1 N e1 N 101929.15 CI t 77 11 / a �REN1'�� 0 1 E 99283.86 I r. I s ...COR , r , B3 .3 R sl , ELE -100.00 i :;%1R!'NSFE,... V FEE •,4�, OLLI oN , I I , �II I I1I : t jess,�, ..AREA w I I ltl'I I , , I I prli�' 1 � ', "- ::a%c --------- 1 i Q /EPAI I I C SIDEWALK ,''C BR15, 9 `•,,'��•',•`,. ,:'' —� �. IT CONIC /. I� SCALE CONIC,'% FL 8'bRAINJS69N , • ! -PB 11 - f _ - gg PAD Br -- -_max n-a.as BI;CONIC OU,B ;`•____ -@>:'., ;. _- - �-�11 fianiCe�' uP/LP ' \-"SBJDN-`.,•—i--UP __ _ _ - =- f ._._.' '1 04311 p - \ pp fE 6�LQv 9LiFD i p NEr+r R] ��_�- R-n.so, rz.0 BMD BTA B3 UP,LP SwpMPSCOTT ROAD _ ------ PK SET OSMH 3•, NETT % NO PIK W9B1E -'�-� N 101194.04 �' 6/ME00 n0 E 99660.94 4312 ' _ELEV=64.65 FEET - _ SMC STA 02 FIND - -��__ _ _ __-- - - PK SET N 101734.19 E 95514,61 ELEVm102.68 FEET Dw.WN Be ssslu mlrMSL SCALE JOB 03407 L Group,Inc. ,.0 ..,'L.. w ,. Transfer Station DEPT.DNsm9 '°"°"•"' 1•• 30 .. "noo n Lown-non E n g l n e e r s S c i e n tl sta Planners 11 NO.Photograph Location Plan ' aNOL PLOT DATE 41NE]9De SII DOE 9lne IN CHINA`m W D"DR°"D" Salem, MA SHEET REVI5KIN5 wm e�wgw ro:m w oWmm.r m,:m,cip ' Photograph Log(3/02— 1/08) Salem Landfill and Transfer Station tExisting Site Conditions 12 Swampscott M Salem,MA *} Y 4 t $ `� ' Photograph 1: View of the transfer station and Swampscott road, Photograph 2: View from transfer station facing southwest towards facing northeast. compost area :yOAap , — �� s R i+p Photograph 3: View of transfer station and yard waste compost mound. Photograph 4: Current truck parking area to the west of building stack. r 'r' tl i -z y Y t It ' Photograph 5 Transfer station and concrete block retaining wall Photograph 6: Looking in to the current waste processing area (facing north). Pagel of 3 L — ' Photograph Lo 3/02— 1/08 Salem Landfill and Transfer Station g g� ) Existing Site Conditions 12 Swampscott Rd Salem,MA t Photograph 7: Lower dock area looking south. photograph 8: Former incinerator stack. r .. la 2008 .a ' Photograph 9: Existing Yard Waste Drop-off Area. Photograph 10: Inlet to existing Forest River Culvert. ;��i r �� r� ��{I YitY�f �+T'•(.� 1 h'M� .}� .. 'Pf. yvr'6 ,et:. �r tl yl. i � u i - . 8 13 Photograph 12: Concrete barrier at top of embankment at Photograph 11: Area just to the west of current Yard Waste down-stream end of Forest River culvert. Drop-off Area. ' Page 2 of 3 ' .• •• , r •• jxgxfW . . .•. x Ylw � a� grAi _'1��'za' : J � A9+— i.-„wiY y” i F_ {y�p��w��4 #r �➢�e 2008 p od (' p, WK On � w { Vy � h �J��,{ ��µl Y 1! ¢y+lnyyY /N•T_gam � �.1r Wµ�. } w• I + i�` '4.'W �r,'�Y.r'C {y. l $ Fp4iyj .Gl-lp ! r} �� ''R {YpT,,,?y �L,rfiy ,k �.. 4�i'r$■` _ � f pjj� a �,rjt•- -i „��+y aim. !! � t� t r ♦�, ✓ � .. � •+:A� ., 'a� � � iii., �� i9 ��'��`S LIM • \ y1111y ,1 n �`' •�u./` i.�{rty� (+kxa 1''\`[t,#cr, n � .,1C. w � ani +,spw. ';�1 h �. • t T ,y11 , . �� ` �1.a� f %+ �]'?'iri,M�'f•��Y f a t 1 ' ATTACHMENT H Letter from City Solicitor Q F of Si-, tU-m r , LEGAL DEP RT NIENrz - 9�R`� tII�L7O ��;Z i •J. ah,1L yey n.t;Fu - Is. 9-8-7 � 9, F:v{:978-1744-1279 Klm--F >;i. -6thz v�t'*-tti�1 uR.�. _1H?_tu, "L.%,SSG. TO: galena Board of]-leaith Froin. Elizabeth Rennard Re: Transfer Station Dane September 13, 200 O vbehalf of the Ciiy, s Transfer Station Comm ittee,l am pleased to utfonn s-ou that after meeting with Roard off4ealth representative Paulette Puleo last meek, our committee[net with the proposed developer of the Salem Transfer Station to clarity two key issues and begin the discussion relapse to mitigating some of the environmental concerns raised by Nis. Puled The follossmgis a summary ofthe findings of out[needing acid suggested mitigation and-reduction cd; ' tonnage TONNAGE The tonnagel initshall'ba based upon an annual figvi-e of 124,500 tons Chis is based,un 400 torts G days per x eek. At'no time ma N'SC eicced 25%of the daily tonnage_, of 500 tons, to :rake tip an-shord ills that may have been incurred in a,"prior period. 71tAfFIC NSC e titaaled that the additional 300 tons per da} may result in ZS erre trocks. or50-more ruek� trips, per�lay:'Sf% or ofthese [nicks is estimated to be.AtSC vehicles. Due to the size of the current vriincics tt atutitiles the transfer station (cats,pickups and small dump), there may be a reducnon in theaafiiberpt those vehicles from 20-35 per day to that of:5-20,per day IR QUALITY WI1T161TION NSC shall plant trees to mitigate the e5ect ofbaming fossil fuels. Quantity and tree location shall be deieninined throunh:the assistance of the City Arborist. NSC shall purchase alternative low sulfur fuel foi-their waste handling vehicles \;C shall also require their dontractors_to use on-road Low sulfur diesel for their off road equipment. NYSE, shall retrofit all yard vehicles<i,nd up to 19 collection %vehicles that service the Salem area with diesel reduction filters- NSC shall enforce the current idling policy imposed by the State. in addition, to continue the - process to reduce the overall generation oY diesel emissions, ASC will conmri, to educate ail non NSC vehicle operators and to promote the installation of the reduction filters and d]e usage of lose sulfur diesel fuel 1 1 I ' ATTACHMENT I Additional Information Supplemental Information to Notice of Intent (2/28/08) Supplemental Information to Notice of Intent (3/7/08) 1 1 III - r Inc. 315 Norwood Park South r i Group, c .- Norwood;MA 02062 (781)2351982,fax(781)255-1974 Engineers - Scientists - Planners wm.BETA-Inccom ' February 28, 2008 ' Conservation Commission City of Salem 120 Washington Street Salem,Massachusetts 01970 Attn: Ms. Carey Duques, Agent Re: Supplemental Information to Notice of Intent Salem Transfer Station & Landfill Closure Project Swampscott Road, Salem, MA ' Dear Ms. Duques: The following questions were posed by the Conservation Commission at the public hearing held for the referenced project on February 14,2008. On behalf of Northside Carting, Inc. and the City of Salem,we have provided the following responses in bold text. Copies of the referenced documents are included as Attachments. Y How will the material exposed during the process of day-lighting the river be handled? Will it be capped? The waste materials will be removed from the subject portion of the river and placed under the area to be capped to the east of the Forest River. All materials will be capped in accordance with the detail presented as Attachment A. ' ➢ New plans to reflect the removal of the 60 feet of culverted river. ' Reference is made to Attachment B. Width of the roadway leading to the rear of the site, proposed drop-off area for ' residents, can it accommodate two cars? The width or the roadway to the yard waste and recyclable drop-off area will be a minimum of 26 feet to accommodate two-way traffic and large vehicles used to ship the yard wastes and recyclables from the site. That change will be reflected in updated site plans to be submitted to the Commission. ty Detail of guardrails to be located along roadway leading to the rear of the site. ' Reference is made to the Details Sheet included as Attachment C. 1 Lincoln,RI Norwood,MA Rocky Hill,CT Ms.Carey Duques,Agent ' February 28,2008 Page 2 of 3 ' ➢ Profile showing layers that make up the cap. Reference is made to the capping detail included as Attachment A. ➢ Concerns about existing catch basin(s) on site and procedure to discontinue it/them ' All existing catch basins will be removed and the associated drainage lines will either be crushed and placed under the cap of the landfill or removed and disposed of off-site. ' ➢ Location of proposed guardrails throughout entire site,retaining walls are noted but not guardrails. Reference is made to the Site Plan included as Attachment B which illustrates the location of the guard rail ' v Lack of curbs; how will cape cod berms hold up to the plows during winter; what is outlined in the O&M plan? ' The O&M Plan will include a provision for annual spring inspection and repair of any damaged sections of the Cape Cod berm. ' ➢ Phase 11 Comprehensive Site Assessment, mentioned that you could bring a map to the next meeting showing the location of the test pits. ' We have included to location plans for test borings (not test pits) as Attachments D and E. They illustrate the locations of all test borings taken at the site; copies ' of boring logs are included in the Appendix to this submittal. Y Section of property that is outside of the property line—How to handle? ' The City Solicitor has coutacted the Property Owner(North Shore Self Storage) and a tentative agreement to execute a construction easement to allow site access ' for purposes of landfill closure has been reached. That agreement is currently under development and will be executed soon. Northside Carting, Inc,may, at its discretion, acquire that portion of the adjacent parcel after transfer of the ' City-owned property to Northside Carting, Inc. >, Final restoration plans, details about plantings, what and how restoration would occur along river bank and other sections of the site. No plantings will be permitted on any portions of the capped landfill and no ' other adjacent areas will be disturbed. The slopes of the landfill, including those along the river, will be reseeded with a "slope mix" specifically developed with 1 Ms.Carey Duques,Agent .February 28,2008 Page 3 of 3 deep rooted grasses that will hold the embankment from sloughing off to the river. Reference is also made to Attachment A. On the west side of the river,we will have an opportunity to provide indigenous ' plantings at the periphery of the site,but landscaping will be kept to a minimum. We trust that these responses adequately address the concerns of the Commission at this '- time. Please call me with any further questions or concerns. ' Very truly yours, BETA GROUP, INC. Alan D. Hanscom, LSP ' Senior Associate cc: Beth Rennard,Esq.,City Solicitor David Knowlton,City Engineer '- Robert George,NSC Bill Thomson Jr. NSC 1 ' 315 Norwood Park Soofh I G�®� Norwood,MA 02062 _. pr Inc. (781)255-1982,fax(781)2551974 - Engineers • Scientists . Planners www.BETA4nc.corn March 7, 2008 Conservation Commission ' City of Salem 120 Washington Street Salem, Massachusetts 01970 ' Attn: Ms. Carey Duques, Agent Re: Supplemental Information to Notice of Intent Salem Transfer Station & Landfill Closure Project Swampscott Road, Salem, MA Dear Ms. Duques: ' The following questions and comments were posed by the Conservation Commission at the public hearing held for the referenced project on February 28, 2008. On behalf of Northside Carting, Inc. and the City of Salem, we have provided the following responses in bold text. Copies of the referenced documents are included as Attachments. ' ➢ Use of filter bags in lieu of hay bales and silt fence for erosion control at limits of work. We agreed to the use of Straw WattlesTm and/or Filtrex)Crm filter socks in lieu of hay bales and silt fence, to avoid introduction of invasive species of plants. See attached product sheet in Attachment A. ' ➢ What will be done with respect to general site cleanup, including stockpiled pipes, curbs and miscellaneous building materials? ' All existing surface debris around the property, including the shoreline along the western boundary of the property, will be cleaned up and disposed off-site, or incorporated under the DEP-approved landfill cap at this site. To the extent that the miscellaneous pipes, curbs and other stockpiled materials are desired by the City,they will be relocated by City forces to an alternative storage location. ' Otherwise, they will become the property of Northside Carting, Inc. upon transfer of the property and the materials will either be relocated for re-use, or demolished for placement under the landfill cap or under paved areas in ' accordance with DEP's conditional approval of the CAAA Report and the DEP's Asphalt, Brick and Concrete (ABC) Re-use Policy. Lincoln,RI Norwood,MA Rocky Hill,CT ' Ms. Carey Duques, Agent March 7, 2008 ' Page 2 of 3 ➢ What will happen with the construction debris generated from demolition of the ' existing incinerator building and stack? ' In accordance with DEP's conditional approval of the CAAA Report, re-use of the demolition debris (after abatement of regulated building materials) will be permitted under the paved areas of the site to help achieve final grades. Care will be taken during placement of the C&D debris, including embedded gravel layers and compaction, to avoid future settlement. ' ➢ Have the building materials ash and other"suspect" materials inside the incinerator building and stack been sampled for hazardous residuals? ' The answer is that most of the materials were sampled during a pre-demolition survey conducted in July 2005. The primary contaminants of concern include: ' • Asbestos containing building materials (roofing materials,wall panels, gaskets, duct insulation, mastics and floor tiles); • Lead based painted surfaces; and Pigeon guano. The ash within the chimney has not yet been tested, but we plan to test the ash for heavy metals prior to demolition. In most cases, the ash will be similar to all of the other ash on the site and will be suitable for placement under the engineered cap. In the event the total metals exceed certain threshold values, we ' will perform toxicity characteristic leaching procedure tests to assess management requirements. ' ➢ Where will the drainage pipes be installed with respect to the engineered cap for the site? ' All drainage pipes will be installed above the engineered impervious liner; however, the drainage structures will be provided with a "geotextile skirt" sealed with bentonite to prevent infiltration of rainwater around the periphery of the drainage structures. The skirt will be similar to that illustrated on the guardrail detail included in Attachment C. Reference is also made to the Detail Sheet included in Attachment B. ➢ Will the guard rail supports be installed above or below the geotextile barrier? ' Reference is made to the detail included in Attachment C which illustrates the guard rail installation detail. The support will penetrate the geotextile fabric to an approximated depth of 4 to 6 feet below grade. A sleeve filled with a "geotextile skirt" will be installed over each support and the annular spaces will Ms. Carey Duques, Agent March 7, 2008 ' Page 3 of 3 be filled with bentonite chips to seal the connection. '- ➢ Provide a drawing showing the proposed location of a new concrete inlet headwall on the existing culvert, or on a new culvert, as may be necessary. ' Reference is made to the new Site Plan included in Attachment D. ➢ A hydrologic analysis should be provided to substantiate sizing of a new culvert ' and/or installation of an inlet control device for flow attenuation. BETA has performed a preliminary hydrologic analysis and determined that the existing 48-inch diameter culvert is oversized for the drainage basin. Furthermore, restoring its full flow capacity could result in worsening downstream flooding problems. Based upon the initial modeling results, we will '. likely recommend installation of a concrete headwall/structure with an inlet control device. In the event the existing culvert is not suitable for re-use, ' replacement with an 18-inch or 24-inch diameter reinforced concrete pipe will be recommended. Final modeling results will be available for the next public hearing on Thursday night(3/13). ' ➢ Details of the proposed Stormcotor and manholes should be provided ' Details of the drainage manholes and inlet structures were included on the detail sheet submitted with the Supplemental NO] package submitted at the public hearing on February 28, 2008. We have, at the request of DEP, provided a ' complete copy of the Stormwater Management Report in Attachment E. That report includes a section of the proposed STC 900 Stormceptoro in lieu of the originally proposed 4501 unit. ' We trust that these responses adequately address the concerns of the Commission at this time. Please call me with any further questions or concems. Very truly yours, ' BETA GROUP, INC. Alan D. Hanscom, LSP ' Senior Associate cc: Beth Renard, Esq.,City Solicitor ' David Knowlton, City Engineer Robert George,NSC Bill Thomson,Jr.,NSC i 1 ATTACHMENT J Progress Set of Drawings 1 1 1 1 I� I� 1 1 it 1 ® WASTE TRANSFERSIDE CA 'A Rm"'T I N GNOTE: These preliminary drawings are provided for review of the building layout STATIONu-rm% TH and operational concepts only. Subject to change during final design. T % ISFER" STAT10 " PROGRESS SET 1 SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 1 LOCATION PLAN 1 OWNER SYMBOLS: DRAWING LIST: BETA ENGINEERING "^ ` ° 1 ® ® bll.YmO W E VWIF.4J'le£VAMYL RF21gNO8RfCAPXYI PMFaOHEV 000(WSE RRLFORMWF][RYWMY NINmRN /./ wR BHiIETK ® mB1�oaERuel raxW®LrBrNGEuvnrin 315 Norwood Park South " M Rb 51Wf 913i,wERF E1fM 6lR1NM WLBIOIEIWAE! fiP�&Bnt ® 9a19F14MG Norwood,MA 02062 '.'��,/.'� BIN410ronII � Gri91vlBWal ® 318tt 1011®INf➢¢9 �� eEY�16MAKw rt,RCQRVq 1 Tel. (781)255-1982 GF UN MN p 1En ARDW F bTG Fppppppp �,� —{VII FXIEPRNEIEVAIkR H]LLtiv¢IMB..uED1B �£VAPNw PQYATIQ11 ajjBiY r1 �(R,IOOff fAt) ® SIWILNPRlL4PJ111£ � EiPPPW1�IIFHA1lNll K1101E1®GpERMS �_ 90£iMl®EEIflAl10N6 1 - .- rzmErnvro xAwliPranoc � rearm \J mei xw�mlea,mro www Ki eNmisen+runa�m ARCHITECT WWdDR N KumnRMe ® MOd SnOPN RDW x� G EIDpR 1 Mount Vernon Group Inc. ® �KS�PNRRW o � �wTro °" � 9FVAiXw ubGTG7 vxX)c wbgXNE �'�� ARCHITECTS&PLANNERS @TA49RIIPY.MIII1 :R9WffWNL iR56RWIRM-BLMH sMP.NTW z waEs�t - 1 20 CabDt Road saBvamDnER _wus<c^°" _ snms SRM.YIPSIImIGPin1 Mum,MA01801 aWnE 1 n Rsrc \ —LE aE RNWaww Tel:V81)937-972DFac g81)937-9728 pMT AD BBRG NDM " � _.-_.._ RHIffARlPBGNXILHI➢!E8 �sFrnwimmxBnw PaE,Wm B�SMRRE SF1.iNY+aw+vw 1SEEMRAP1RrmnmYclFu WaDWMPMw aoaN�xlNSMnI Va+,GLecv.111M POW NMB- ROOtLR41W111fG1HM io3A Rl16FNG 9NAIIOi1FB.TKBMY — FinaYIW 1 ABBREVIATIONS: 1 WJ1Sf PlAl5Pfs1 CHP IXp1G110U58Q}} m ETA FASMtlro1BMw (i 6r.V Lc IENO]m aR 6W9RE RYp SC1BH 9O�IIE TqL 1p,V91 M NEADPAA DWI CM9?A1 m UR4DW GR ERNE LGP L TRORlM1LLPNR bIX mmn $LT. .9HTro1 NN RtMStMt =W, WXSIWCIMW ECSC WNG Wm lPA@IO Lm IFMGfN 0?K CPFNK+ IF. VFRISPE LLL 00EM1A1FPSVP R)Rr kuo uv�9®ft1%W COR EYP 9.. AU dwlplgb UPR5 APrt DID 6AIDISIPoIGI LWt LGM.F IBMGIMEAFMRG GqUg840M@XS p GVFp�F1➢ S'L MLM Un" HDMD Mll NWYMw OYfIR CgY1WCfnl EP. EWSID GT. 6YCdP1. lP 1IINNNt a OR UPKR xm AL W COPE WgOY'q EXT MD00R GW8 GYi.P.MWIL&Yf0 OWI. WIRYhl311 1 NAl MgIOt CA WOPglgt WRK EXryNUyyp LA ILU'91 FNGH PNiRR01 4IGS SILUXNW1TKRG OY UVFYdiIMR81 ,w}qL X XPgY w3 [OLL43 NL NM9PM MRllL � DR GIPBME1E11l6M Bi .0 CLL CUMIFIBKK FG➢ F 007RRPNIe RCP. MAVPGP m 1LY]IPE FW. MVUXt 9 m % SMA4 V4HIL N TCW N G9L m R4lEPFCOY8INY1 IeAn IN®ACfD KAT IM49WI PL RISKlN1WAlE SIS 9101G t9lf l}AIXA. ro 8 CUn G9MET OpL1EAiyt 2 MTG^A MOL Nle WT !/AIHdK R Mh A�A1R'S WR. BPAME! CNLL DMMK4 R,WNt FL m� W 1A RA4 Rr3fHt BG %JNE IESf YCSIfl1AF 9f4 WIIpPW _ NH MLQYNEfK 51W S,wfB VAC WMMLLWu HX G[CN OA PTL4`FILIWG F RC�aLlX NFAL WXBEVRM "FM MENBW Rm R�w6NG 1 RIG BIOw,wG DET. DRk FE FREIIMfi096i1 URWE4N8ALDDD RIMA PWL FEC FFEEOWp19kR NF IO'3llf R't IETXDDw R4 PMH Si SIpICRFµ111fE Vl WOEMI£RNWE k/. M DF 6vlKNF'FOJXfKV GBNEF xF(x AVM6ACDPR W PARRID 58 U.DARn91Efl W WM 0f. BORW W. PAMEiHt HiIL IF.{IWGNTRPRW: XM YBPYW fA PAR WC WATFACI�S 44R. BA¢NQD WR DRfffi9n: FS RAT FP1191 6NRf/JItl1YJM.G SN BfA& FA RAT NSL M0LDNG FA6 P@ RVfIED SD 51F8 Nn V'Cm M. WNN RHC RERL�LM9ET IO PfLLE p.WF191 MLC ROffiIG P.T. RC9.IXTIEt1H1 S1fYLC 5116CNRY WA VffffEH96i WL YB�aX01 CV4 CAWVEt On tlR0 RL R6ry X MbI PqO ND RIRSBD EDSIG Qi QLVKM11F Bim'B® ma MINpM' CB ONI%@Y.ZAn 1 fDA Ce.F.rt OA ghG'IOFFNNG R Fl[Qo w3 SW0.W:MGNFS NA Na51XT DXSC,VN1 NT OLYIIfFY T Wo VMDYN@FNV16 CACI CENfAC10E p�W. R,R, t pyM xrwyD6fert NOATRBW iBIE A9F WP, MgEigl9lNG CG fA41H(Pll® MTi p MRD FP 0.�P.E'OWG W% w.CUMry NR NFTN R W4A T8 TN%01W M M9GR . CP GSI"FME FA FIQ1 F3 AE91RO NDMDR NYC MpC YF1K[Qt1NLtOT Mato- PAIDMIOi FNORWE la 1ER =A W.WY MIIp®YMEXEBH En E 4108 FSE R L� 4Y4 M(F 0.a RJS wUP1 R� 1II Tr51WESw Ht nL C8NG �(! El Emw901KwF FR. 1FFTFOOF AST !f¢SF 1W. M11PAl PFIXF PBNFOI>BiG m IOMl£dfKOVE L MEVR KIw Sw l n%G PWAtnG EL ElEYA1N11wMEl Ri "J115fffHT R. AMT NlC HTROFIIRICi ,VEER IE `KXR P% 1NWR34 1 D CtFM EIFL MAWVt FA R`Rdi0 RWdI 1110:9NPD nK nCSET Et£l' R&ntNellFrL'AEI Fa PuvEDOPB:nG 18RPSOD M m lM Iv.R R®1811 nT m1£T cO cFiA Ov:rIG e£V MH G GRKE uu i.velu,® sua tulaw �"G MC RPDF ElE [0. CCLOW FIu FaMV DRVA v' OYII+OIL R0. PLVD10'41W1G TAS RVwWEH aMiL CO1L�R GC f HMLaY11P.K1O1 OG GR9CF 0.'NF161 TW IIP6WNl M GICRRRR RRWL RMN SXRV£ ' 2 Mate Boa.d of Building Regulations and Standards -.GENERAL NOTES: - Northside Carting Transfer Station,Salem.MA.. 1.•ul,NaonuFswzBffTSAmwBxmemwssTwlortl u..orevaz Icmu y` A .. ..-. 2 BIIIreNG[wTgFM,fUlAYSTI£SO119,IEF:OIN161 FN.TMr U.BapFt « ' rNBEemxmsErnwFmowm6 ry.Fmwnnmazaa '_ FMIB WIA`N£�J11Nv�dBaeB/g.^t Bunts moose � z FBFvwuwu,�rTFFBmBlaianecc saFolm.+ I6.TmwRmmamW � � 1 4n�RREwTaruFav Fx,wnel 4 FYE WNLtl91F169W1]HfrlF ld9f8l@II569ri1O,A0 3141U£ IV OODSI \`A IA•7mwRTt➢ST1A � � 11RRAfuR BM\1101'MVLri1M / \ ' S ALFJS ypNB(ryNA�IS.p9WLi9£fTER$P8FF1B6 &Bt®IOTYFE TJ S-� SII83 FIMS11Db@BW9 / ss -`: \ ixI QLV T➢B 81.N�RO1YIm6BYY8pB101>9�8 \ H1H16 (9.m W16➢0 Nu.F 11011Y WVFFNOFmTFXz09S�F AA Fl9fbF0 4 NIFPEB4F196 W1•I1 p'I6lY re,116B:1ICx 190(11111 B eP.F:+•>: ♦ '-.moi. 3 \ OCQ&N1CI FEnW1�Ma yP r FVFF.winwmewummrlxmsanB+Fmownw B""'re� - �,°op"pmu / i LOADING P \ ' AwRTw.mzv+ wm ml.+i.�e '. SSVm2W�1CaWL�R,Mn11811w]G1Wirn➢ -Ya+•L>�.,� / —NP ln6i. I C .. oev vola m _ '....'f`fin B FinaTovmoFonB+6AwAmc®ImoaueeFlm�/a omaaawr mmaznomoP.l / VEanF®BrmowmB cul'. s.urwx Fran tmwww V.V® m1ID�1•q r Ps�'- 1 m F�oomzA��.vs,vu Bemm�unASFenemmAon ,�...n.v.� Nomhi..pl�ol Ta.N� maawi.Prwc I LOADING -1 nm ,m6s P.. •F..ewl..n� � L A: ,/aaF. j ,.rvan♦uF�wueEmmAa�ernnF®enmwRmn Nn >mmueFssuArFlwRmeea. rm emrmxa Finamrm.+m6 g 02005.73 2 FH WR,6NYAiNOBRAEMOFPAG6ttYlBBNt.NDElAt1EM@ °°'�"° 1 LOADING FLP. Bran warm u.o�F.nB.z<a-zs...».rmm.Bmsmm.. �_ t m4.,B Im•�-nB......B.wa..e,..+•.m�aF�.. — _ r Northside Carting u FwE�RBUBplarnw4mwEeFFronB®.4�Brman ewe +ms. ` Transfer Station DCSIgR Bb.P.aSaVmBv. BnsF. � r EFm B 4 2 _IV a w�Fxrmavvex+swEeEFa<er®Av��mrawn®B nvnxa/v� Be,q.�N.m.+a Fv�Fs• ws Ewers E91cC.,.= as R43 /xFJA 168\321 AmA/u.�=6.>m 5F 1➢ontl.B�� Am US. / c CUC- \ / ' ti STx1®RBr81BBWW10ENV.'�K16p1�BY9)OW \ / Pctual Na 9 + \ Br6,mm wnlm mFa maFaPF.wu / \ / I6 raF mPINUENF Bsanrnoxfi°.guff Frmv,�u�m Buses � Irrecw mon A Aomnm Amrxe-,aysF xmwPF m z t ' n.wcwTwslsnu+Bwa6erm.>®.nw.aermerTeoom TwAxau+ee- �uo..e. Mms tam+sFroat B o 6 // \ \ TIPPING / \\ CODE mat Buaxas - gasF Fvrx a • ♦ / \ // \ REVIEW In xnaunt FtaEEo•_Tcrnwselee s,Nt BEtrrn»mA+ffn.Pa roto -z.1Fes rw.3®c.emrere.m.a / \ \ / Br FmwRgRaz ma.PSF.m.lmnu wnmv I \ / Ew, 9`n, . F9rwC4. tlr S6 RPiER4Wi9Mll•6EFM8FJAA4fLNED BY FBI WImIY / / � ]� � C QQ a� 310 MI Q.W TIy9M8 / \ / acWd Ne B -n p B9JPNFF14.D 91Vll0EPIV.I®P9 RVID®,BFT/9£Im11] µyma Npg� NBwPTMEk Fn.mRRw.om B 1 nmuRNArrBmaBFBa mvnr vBmBzrnwFmOBt10x6 mooyFlpy.xr•ma.+..P�m1eeF.em. xore raBiol BetmlNr160rw FU6�6VJ6Utf16 nsr. UW11n®(6F10E1 F1[APFBf�NO r I IOYNBB9LA 3 \ 1 a vxslwm+/.wEVPu4uwirrmxsclm,Feoowronu vermATwvam�e+mmeem+m�s a xlnmxss Bvu ma,rnmlretFrn Fm OW,4IILNmre RIQR +m / \\ u6 �om�m.�6 F°,antvl C vutcr® a BNxmnFFUNu CH.RM_ - F•EPf Y4N9 AV611(NnIg9Vllf@6lYWI1x6inM1Bl0➢It®4 I {1LCq 66T3 ' - r A3wRn.mFnxo,as �4 F9P [a BF. a 1 rotanx4eaus - axmaT6R4oFo,.zoxmiwml�nm+mma,®a osm..lsN..aoeamoe.+ ' 1 magna sFawrrcuama®aeswiawnr x,rzlFrE faCpulF+8rl8fE£MIaBwKt5o3s1wblRrreveAn`OlmYBwwRMu2x,BwllfalBxm•u mLa•F-»oEF.®�wu/Sme®m{{m�ud 1Fv+rNv R[+IIMNBEIyNyG,BF%IXS[I,U4fT�9 RLCNP+B+iBL1G ,IA , F ExFT9, / muuxT VERNON IG anue gmFr.,BTIPPING FLR. ARCH TEGTS k WIM FSBa.,snrm.s,o� wawa Ngo , 1 \ Exn3B A:Nm Eg.act wam = J6 N61otVwFwn GnPFp,6x ' amosF.z,ve-fa,ImsF.V�+.1 WAXRHiblsx 1R z F +3 = Eq.m cW ]a0 / A41EMRbW BB.zF.m.mBmro.aw. [WNAGFMTAAB Fnm + + \ Egres wmn = xa f3 Nb01B4 NaaNInW41E01 F,u.linp8pnzml8-F8306ye1bfl e„QAHI vf6 , i \ Egrm Coo. 240 / lana Ny z i 'rn an me r B6 \ T 2 J nlwB F IFC6&mpn6Nbtra16 E BAVMMvtlardYeA / \ \ / M.•m Yt OT�PaPW / \ \ / vm4 gawea.mBR'aN.B/® •3lW MBeTm / \ \ / / A Fam.Bn rm.Nv / \ ' / lYFN40.MR \ l PFdN \ / a OFFICE ' r BF PFe.Td I aFVB n wTc C a aa® a LOCKER RM. 1 I wa t��: NOTE: These preliminary drawings are provided for review of the buildinglayout YI and operational concepts only. Subject to change during final design. \ an, MEZZANINE FLR. CR `� Eg.as ceB. zw QJIrS Iry aslR IVIM)xB�DFR Wn q __w+E 3xESKam .. Oluimmm,rns A --.z'.. �w. ... . . y r. a•lvm EY+W(MBTClm1Ef �Gt��.; I 3,2,WmAT@%Artn I.LT4lKKlrlr. 12'KKN WYLf q EI" �O. raAelEs°aJxm _�_� .(NCE.m ^ arPia RcrosrRcnnE y _ 1 - OA q BREPJ(RM. h 1 - LDING � rslR 102 A / ~ ____�_____ L – J � a 103 B unm+D )nsAm6tr O I .:It s Y l O ®E[Inp.IBIRi rJANET I � LR�ING W+gxPRR I� 0� Blm j +14'NW DAJCIIVL} r 31 rNErx iMtR4® 6 L __ TilV6Il®Y44L a G6 WILxOM1® 1 Rn �..- fE6GVi1K ereRrne Wxr°TBR =b� w^ Purinm. A 9- y - " 0700523 o« LOADING FLOOR No ,nr•YS Northside Carting rkTx 4lnnxm euvmP l.J na%Pssstw+mx ,m. a.,rnn4r t -. �J+xn.4Jo�roo Transfer Station Design p_ "V IWA reuw latrml r ped ,rd rJ �. 1 STAIR t 31R sawGArloMAvn .n lR ,ed ea frd Ied ed Iro a 1 106 p 1 vAe� waJAnxxmm I 1 a"ll Ga sE• marr Tr ral ��^J' 1 � I Rn Rn I Rn Rn rAce EAoI»� A vx+ec IW[ ' IPY J,%,2Tx 411. - O I%A ODIIL O qL5 ErIOJ+��xPIA FLOOR PILINS vwJlsl�pRl%anx xal�Ex sls>afl1 �J1 ENLARGED OFFICE PLAN-TIPPING FLOOR "O°101 'N°e 1 1 R 16Y SIP I%B nuv R�41AVI1T11'STWR TPPING wPJfxxeurmsM� 3T IlE)Ksnra I tDt - c y mArFrlsAJsalxmwG RI3 - 1 2 rd +rd - - - -- - 1WQ�E4fML0M 1E0. � RN2P9iwP � 01rMNGRIXA TSF I'6 Yi VJ 13.1P 9V TYSAAi91 PAV6B+'NRBD31Y0. � RIIWW✓!®III/ 1 6•IW$ '$RM. BRENCRM• ® ® � ® ® g�R�IDaamxX° q I I tIXf _ 102 - I RnmPlsllxo _ i$P fE9F/I.4P 6 lOt6VY1P®AY G may__ � b ® �QPAT®CGWI49R O KK IID _ STPJ 1 TVN,M91W41 n O WEFII4YPd9@1 COFLW WR O, ZOS A LOCKER �°� 203 A nsrd PR. - bb `•I�I`' _jIE m ® �YIn�PD4 6•IttW • n MOUNT VERNON GROUP ARCHITECTS MMA �BII w: MpPA VommGlwy,hlc Rn Rn +wr4�1� �T1 TIPPING FLOOR 2GCaEN Rina OO �� rL-..•. ++ Ins.+•d Wo0ulr6Mawtllugle Ql�1 t IN M m - 201 A O p y evsEwrzfwiaswml t ° 2 3 TBt XT)9'TmT R3tOt61WKT6E 'x T!1 PSf p'/H F $ ® r led Jed rd ryyh�E ^ ^ t 4 ^ 20.5 C 206 C ffi o e;'± •, +ROL nn rd 1NSQ i ed rd •�1 ? rl A _ � j M I 1 ruuJc.w%meA�mwruPx113 ✓��Y „vis ,�`• I El tNRRAlEP11LOL4fN P)t» Pn Raw +A./??�• i' 4 4; RION TYPE GENERJLL NOTES PART1 O �✓` n n -t.PAONOERRESrOPRNG AT PJE MIFD AR�Ja1EG -# 2PRWICE B40NEgA1SATND4 NEMT®A`�IJKIES § C 1FF91GN2AP 3PImN0FWWDBLCCVNGWMETK 9NDPMIlIIR15fORWxLNIXVrt® c 'd A4�ImlE4wrlLpNceU)XDTluun®tD1HERUA'MIGTa¢Ef q ' :. - 1 oX wHwo M _ Ja. tmerPwmnoxsruawuT.nceMAw�xDau� B _ _ _ _ ��GW� k'e li.+lza+sd FIIIEEYIINQI1310L5MLLYAYIX WNLrAv08Aii1[G tuvwEEswiMf.siAm r-___ lfAU1DEJBEM AVDFFAVNTAi wIFASFLfICw3GFD1551AtNilUTtS(RT.1 � BVIRrKHC¢xvt vu wsNmTn _ VY P.PFx4mai4Hlm 3r I I 1.� I .. 6uR1PF BIAVR+G 0.n 1 b.PR0V10ECIXr:ERGUAR0.5 Al NLWISfE WA'HbCNGV9 WN15 G _ WIAT ti+C t I, L___ s ENLARGED OFFICE PLAN-MEZZANINE FLOOR %N" +%fl°"�''�f0}41x1°°°Rr,�GEmwA)Exreacn m. omF Paom Es �� WKITDCFNIRt MNE aF AitBLMSNDIwtFSSD11®N595ENDRIl 4 I 201 _ MA Ann Avm Ivv ).HIQIIxPOLI GYPStCJ wALLBDMDrflu BE lVSF9x Ma11f9EE utRLS, ° W foTF/ca 01r 0.`IDNDfAB?+E @d AFF-IHIE40RIfA115EN011F® nta RR Il\n/1 =n1 VJTBL x0® t fl pp NDi l!$MGN IMPKTGYP31N WO11 B34®UI AYTdWEAlAl9315 � — — — fFGWSWWKLQ6NO. QEIIINDCpWWR11KY3tS MRPfEPRWM14. h I I •T NOTE: These preliminary drawings are provided for review of the building layout mF ONErIx XAnlm+Dus coDlmlwEwm+eAneuxi4 EIEVAnDN4 A�.1 11 and operational concepts only. Subject to change during final design. n Minn"INE FLOOR V NTv YY d ROOMFINISH SCHEDULE GLAZING SCHEDULE C F *a ft.A6 9Nm LQgElE PELHIfP.\£ PAM®UNRMIImCOC nFM RBBHI M911C91f.W1W6K/InW(,` wA2D M�.¢>�iasam�wcT Xr.Mexrxa Pux+ms�P. t hms JuausTsmeuvE SPHerrnwAsvmXrmsmsww¢X>r�rHlnoar swu Xe MswdTlmewri�razv>'<vusaursmManHxn.aw rvuw xnw mwmmsEPPmmmv.m eu:vnwmeeuTluMrw+mnuX•a rHmns 3 rureauwauMlsrrnea�mxwv+ealwcm.v�m.amwousrzmn®er nOWfll(iA4 PPAL'f[�M/Li JHE11'PAlmA91®.4®.R%M691QAffiI X�mmsxmmAmAmuus /.11 OwlEmw OmasoN O O ' asysM urmlmnaAmonwmNarnwvmWAum�sanroAm - q � DOOR TYPE ELEVATIONS FRAME TYPE ELEVATIONS ' DOOR SCHEDULE OOMNU AU1mE [mlua+i [OR9h OM1 ®A➢G IPLHmR V84 flWEME iM`E N.VL NEM OI 1VA YR TXE91nS MNVNHE N AIO JI Ary 1%A A NH 3d.Td S 1 M1; W9V,A1m �'t (�� IOiA 6 NR Sd.Td B 0 mbl XH 11YJ Y 1® A TdaTd 1 X!L w9J.Alm 02005 ' 104 A W4 SaiTd e ; - wr c �. Jaa.ra e ; M. naeAisn r[amT tmE anA c xu Td:rd a mum 1 xH. wsHHiPn - Northside Carting Transfer Station Design vm Ja.Ta s s Maui M9 Ta.ra s 1 IU1 - A h i F ti w t t yu A xR Jd ad 9 - 1 - INT.ELEV.MENS BATHROOM 206 INT.ELEV.WOMENS BATHROOM 206 w•-ra +x'-ry ' BORROWED LIGHT SCHEDULE TOILET ACCESSORIES LEGEND Mx nN manxo NUNETY1f mMsrun MAmn uuomc XrHFoI� svlolT N2AH0.0 aml + xH TH; x¢¢mPmm rzalmwmw DOOR SCHEDULPS X11611 : XH. : BATHROOM ELEVATIONS Osou uolmmvusesan slnsax ury®xlman X!� PHe+mHa�asH OVERHEAD DOOR SCHEDULE F-1 J H N 6mwse x o 000nx6 oom N.n mmsa mea wn_ Iuloma uuao2 suols renma vsslFlemvrnc mol arv.slm IJa.J:a wuJAim CWp fieY 51E$ IJdaSYd ILMIm O Bt1M BVYI.VXM1ANLI WIG94M cc® sxv.sl� +Xa,sa J4W.1Am �'n°tT Qsm+-teMv.sm u16AeXomux,wxHmlrooln ' ❑ srTAmmnm 0 � tarxson �, El H MOUNT VERNON 6 R OUP ARCHITECTS NaM[Wil 2DCBb pBx. N LYEo P - WaNuM1MMHWI TCIMMT 1H�l WO F Nlk®uvpudtlh�mm E Man pl wt[ oWm Pn wn ausx luau NOTE: These preliminary drawings are provided for review of the building layout and operational concepts only. Subject to change during final design. A1.2 mNurars Er o io REFLECTED CEILING LEGEND CEILING TYPE LEGEND' / / � / _ 21 ®{/MFTttE/IKU6YFlM Pw1WGFMR1L�f NlG yYgRION#YYIIINMLY.9IF'NW$ �eort Nro MFrRsuvasmxNomgvmrwimaceuxonNa / � / /�/ / / %/ NLcauNcxaamrw Fnsmc®NsmuuneFvean®wrmn aye t>ff �orrre reoR H3tlR lYF£f I4TStI5i9VAPV GYSfEN ' / 1.r MpG96�9CR/SISfB1 W/iVM91'/HPAl19Ni�8 // / ! / // � �I l � 1� '3 MH[61�'J1 eYdiBlrfl MOl NrtNtFA®lY8 �J r' WMGiBPNN1®GNBfPINK ] NMIPIg FFH3lM?BIW95M39rB/ _ MEtQA49•A•IHII WIRD WNp95lNy(N SSfEV 63M2iq h 2 /-'/ // � / ♦-�-t �PArr�� 2r rV Gt➢9]'FILPNNr® TT-/ ! �� uOrtF611R£I�96:rflCRUMWR+m TYPE) F?P(15®S1Ftl1CNfE / // _ - rmr wrmrsawN 0200523 �/ %/! � � NLFNr®rovFWewN�sPuvnFaRPnFnorwmmm . ' �/ ! / /, /'; //- � ® vErnwicuFwmae.r:s£eao+wtis m�m/sa�rz urrorrL�mouclWvaEicwrmriwuNLxw++�nwe®neas mFn mN ! / // ! / /, manr.uecm/.R,woeuvraac Fre Northside Carting i X, / i. - wawas+rcNnsffR¢arortsmrmwa Transfer Station Design •InurFalmuamww+�cFnu:rrux t ' ® wrsw:�aa�wrxwAs �"V +m Im rm 11 13 r.r L8 FY � WIWiNO.pl®SEN®t✓ff 9LC4 PA4S ' mil REFLECTED CEILING PLAN-OFFICE FLOOR "a"'®^i''�'Oi `J rK.rn RF.F'LECTED C� mwv w®v rwmum:se wu COLING PLANS Ono 4r u rd ex - MOUNT VERNON GROUP ' ---- --- -- _ ARCHITECTS ' � NewUVNmon CrvUP6c b✓/ 9!NPw WobwnNmetmHb OtWt '� — _— TNT&fl P2IDi . /' .fI ,� G � N10.TI grLNF _- - __ --- --- _ INo� TnFpnddbchsom E I lip O gy RR AS E! Mf 4r 13 13 r] 88 F4 Stl CY ffllF A9NOIPL 1 REFLECTED CEILING PLAN-MEZZANINE FLOOR NUNx n wx rIC=1'Y MR ' NOTE: These preliminary drawings are provided for review of the building layout �� and operational concepts only. Subject to change during final design. �MG» A _s wswevmmu _ -D t 2 rAraww¢wm - 3 - D - .. C - B xxlvrxesn A - vsvatrow srvix e ' 2a +rS ,vd gy IrtiAan6Nflt 3 erwRam wa O _ t .. wsa Tlwauar e{ +za rrY 'xY WNLVM98 H/ , y /LUI Wl,9t AT K4 HQAIl,61/fit NY IS{ NET.,IHW MA. VEIAV d3�W aYnNSgT llt4 {V:R fiYXR HIX'MA '@MM1 0➢G 16R � gp III � 1 I I � 1 i oneawua+r e a M�AI®lIP � f I 1 YF2 ru I I 91YM1�RLn xrn � � b SEq¢ I I I I _ I nWWGRA I i i i -'� =� _.-. .... _ n�qR► .. ' .;� _ m m � � � I I i � - `:> '> 1 I I IWMORA b _ n4V f#SSIN®Ig3INR GV1GR191 YY1L N9AAlH1¢1l N_R W9UA101W Will f ff MflFEMAY6VJ.q 61� PIIl3 Hf Hn @IV'Y'a NORTH ELEVATION ELEVATION ELEVATION u,t.va �.\ WEST ELEVATION +re-=ru nlch¢ s 0200523 1 'YY` / B C D t c wonr mt Northside Cartmg M9J Transfer Station Design Nt] W4 ~ KEIPLAN I s�,rrc I � 1 1 zas - ______ LOCI�R WOMFN 1 v.-x+.axanmvva 3:l'RY�C 9l6gVM R i I IN _ m StAIRI I renec>rtU TIPPING aIIM VrII qx ,Ot _ b BI7II.DING 1 m aTa¢nnq 9 a�¢Rx ELEVATIONS `.� R cece °-.,°'°° ,. : ...- ,64NGgA STAIR SECTIONS _ S COMING LOADING 4 - II 1, • LO NG ;pm+cnrz �.v� I I A elm R=� ' e BUILDING SECTION BUILDING SECTION =ro 1 MOUNT VERNON GROUP xuraaxRrx�oos�rvwo 2 ARCHITECTS ' PnArtnYf xx•nc Nowtvc G,agr ZcAm� VV-Wm N-.dAANeA WM 161 giyT T i d MATI4rID F Into&nrymblhthmn E x'w+m'aamnW W' / - Y RYMY.U91A9AluNf. 1 4 l}HIB®b'nG b F164-F _ wv+utwuOmu;;wi) NEC,FR V• A \ ¢0.W4PM AWS AFbM nn'rvve¢aw.Tuut I 1 b ¢nwrLL YaM®va[PNl - ' p � Yf IC1m91iPEl96WPfi0 91c c �-� - 1! �^ w PfcV Yf0.W.Wj I rl' r b m I _ y \ 1I - 1 I I FL.Ip.1138 va I i // f SII Ii gNv.rnstr cAn reY.nn sera® mrxnsw waw wan®mmmm+ ._. wwz NYNz NOTE: These preliminary drawings are provided for review of the building layout Cl STAIR SECTION n STAIR SECTION ' and operational concepts only. Subject to change during final design. L J ' '° "`"a A4.1 fi 3 , y 111 1 Y Salem. ENF "� ' w /: oration s v d 700MB, Y z x ,. 1 e—S na . ey b9r m� x k , 141 i � c L i