The URL can be used to link to this page

7 LORING HILLS AVENUE - ZONING r - 1 (' - 13oY1Tig A=.Y115 Avg' SPR x 3 k Union Associates Realty Trust Grosvenor Park Nursing ome o i. �e �G�i(/JG� f�r/I,'2e - � I'r'..C�oY,f'�'/lam -�/SC. � - J ��{ ; ;i �� , II� I r �� r ,; r4 I i i '{"1 l fi _ t � ,� � _, _ e PLANNING BOARD SPECIAL PER!1IT . ( ) [WETLANDS DISTRICT ( ) CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT ( ) FLOOD HAZARD DISTRICT ( ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (�) SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION NO. )_j]BUSIN�/SS/ESi /PARK. DEVELOPMENT APPLICANT: V1 'C� V I jsoct _vp n) /uo_ Thi(o� - a /a 3 P�, urs( PROJECT DESCRIPTION: CONTACT AN Applicant: City: 1. Received by Planning Board (5 copies) 3 ct w c ' (Applicant must also file with City Clerk) ,SIF' > ! 31r c E 2. Distributed for comments - (by --- --t- r w -ti r Comments received o s4 3 c 4. Public Hearing" m ! Q i -- - a. Advertise 14 days before hearing 9� r 7. 90& /z %O � l Dates 9l90 i Date Placed �'U by D //n,y� - b. Notice: Applicant/Owner, City Clerk, c � i Building inspector, City Engineer, Board of Health, Conservation Commission, a Historic Commission, Abuttors , Beverly, Danvers , Peabody, Lynn, Swampscott, 3 , Marblehead. Date Sent45 �,02 by �//y //ot �-5. Decision by PlnnnOBoard 'a U a. Approval (by 2/3) 6 Denial © 1 A-�✓sk-�:lts��..� I -E ro N b. Notice: Applicant/Owner, City Clerk > c Building Inspector, City Engineer, ro cm o Board of Health, Conservation Commission, o 2-1j) s+ N ro o �0 Other. .+ U s4 01w W c ro c Date Sent (� by �' Ab o T 6. Recorded in Registry of Deeds (Applicant's Responsibility) i y, Ctu of �21lrm, �M�SFIC��Liak'��S ars"'• Y.Y` �I�xtrt'rng �uttrt� (rine Salzm @rnit August 17, 1999 Naomi Prenderegast Executive Director Grosvenor Park Nursing Home 7 Loring Hills Avenue Salem, MA 01915 RE: On-Street Parking Located on Carol Way Dear Ms. Prendergast: The City of Salem Planning Board has received a complaint pertaining to on street parking on Carol Way. The complaint stated that vehicles are currently parking on the eastern side (adjacent to the Grosvenor Park Nursing Home) of Carol Way. A site visit was made and it was verified that there is on-street parking occurring on the eastern side of Carol Way. According to the Planning Board decision for the Grosvenor Park Nursing Home Site Plan Review Special Permit dated October 3, 1990, "Parking on either side of Carol Way between the pond and the nursing home shall be prohibited. No parking signage shall be installed to indicate such prohibition." The decision has been attached for your convenience. Please install two "No Parking" signs on the eastern side (adjacent to the Grosvenor Park Nursing Home), to prohibit parking on that side of the street. Please contact me at the Salem Planning Department at 745-9595, extension 311 when the installation is complete, so that I may inspect the signage. Thank you very much for your cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, Denise Sullivan Senior Planner - 4 ofcttzn, tt>; �1h�z;�##s � 3, glttntttnnttr>3 OCT DECISION Site Plan Review Special Permit Vinnin Associates Realty Trust c/o L. James Zieff 33 Bedford Street, Suite 12/11'- Lexington, 2/11=Lexington, MA 02173 Re: Grosvenor House Nursing Home - 7 Loring Hills Avenue On Thursday, July 26, 1990, the Salem Planning Board held a public hearing under Section VII-R Site Plan Review Special Permit of the City of Salem Zoning Ordinance for the proposed construction of a 123 bed nursing home to be located at 7 Loring Hills Avenue. At the public hearing, counsel for the Petitioner introduced evidence in connection with all of the requirements under the Site Plan Review Ordinance including: matters relating to utilities, building mass, traffic, environmental concerns, landscaping, staffing, and other site considerations. There were statements and testimony which indicated that there has not been any nursing home construction in Salem within the last forty to fifty years. In addition, representatives of various social agencies and the Council on Aging testified or submitted statements in support of the project. Petitions with signatures of interested parties were also submitted in support. Opponents of the project expressed several concerns including, but not solely limited to, traffic circulation, noise, change of the residential character of the neighborhood, and adequacy of utilities and parking. The area in question is zoned Residential - 3, which allows multi-family residential purposes. In an R-3 zone a nursing-home is a use permitted by Special Permit. The Planning Board was aware that on March 28, 1990, the Zoning Board of Appeal had granted a Special Permit for a nursing home. Following testimony of proponents and opponents, the public portion of the hearing was closed and opponents were invited to designate a representative to meet with the City Planner to air their further cgncerns: Over.the next several weeks, the City Planner reviewed all of the information and testimony submitted and reviewed the project for the purpose of preparing a recommendation for the Planning Board. The Board, after review of all evidence and careful discussion of all matters with the City Planner, considered the application and at its meeting of September 27, 1990, voted by a vote of 6 in favor, 1 abstention, to approve the requested Site Plan Review Special Permit as being in compliance with all requirements set forth in said Site Plan Review Ordinance, subject to the following conditions: 1. Conformance With Plan Work shall conform to plan entitled "Grosvenor House Nursing Home - Site Plan", dated June 19, 1990. 2. Utilities Utility installation shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer or other appropriate City department head prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3. Board of Health Board of Health conditions stated in a letter dated July 11, 1990 (attached) shall be adhered to. 4. Landscaping Landscaping shall be in accordance with plan entitled, "Grosvenor House Nursing Center - Landscape and Lighting", dated June 19, 1990. a. Trees shall be a minimum of 4" caliper. b. Maintenance of landscape vegetation shall be the responsibility of the developer, his successors or assigns. c. Developer shall construct a ten (10) foot wide berm, ranging in height from 3 to 4 feet, with sloped granite curbing, plantings and other screening (to be approved by the Planning Department), along the entire length of the property line (exclusive of parking lot entrances and egresses) of the property owned by The Loring Hills Condominium which has frontage on Loring Hills Avenue. The Loring Hills Condominium Association shall have ninety (90) days from the filing date of this decision (September 28, 1990) to grant permission to the Developer to access the property belonging to Loring Hills Condominiums for the construction of the berm. If within ninety (90) days, the developer has not received permission in writing from the Loring Hills Condominium Association for construction of the above described berm, the developer shall be required to construct on the City right-of- way, a six (6) foot wide sloped granite bordered berm with 4 inch caliper decidious trees at twenty-five (25) foot intervals. Included in the berm will be a four (4) foot high wooden fence with the design of such fence to be approved by the City Planner. d. After all project landscaping s completed, and prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the developer will be required to add further landscaping if such is requested by the Planning Board or City Planner. 5. Signage Developer shall install "Do Not Enter" sign at the intersection of Loring Hills Avenue and Carol Way and a "Residents and Guests Only" sign on Loring Hills Avenue at the yiz entrance to the Village at Vinnin Square. All project signage shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner. b. Maintenance Refuse removal, road and ground maintenance, and snow removal shall be the responsibility of the developer, his successors or assigns. The Planning Board shall write to the City of Salem to request that Loring Hills Avenue be plowed and maintained by the City of Salem. a. Such maintenance shall include the plowing and sanding of off-site parking areas and walkways. 7. On-Street Parking Parking on either side of Carol Way between the pond and the nursing home shall be prohibited. "No Parking" signage shall be installed to indicate such prohibition. 8. Off-Street Parking Developer shall include fifty-seven (57) on-site parking spaces and twenty-five (Z5) off-site parking spaces as indicated on the approved site plan. 9. Waterflow Test Developer shall provide actual waterflow test results for the site to the Salem Planning Department, City Engineer and Fire Marshall prior to issuance of a building permit. 10. Sidewalk Developer shall construct a five and one-half (5 }) foot concrete sidewalk, and b" granite curbing along the entire Grosvenor House Nursing Home property frontage, along Carol Way and Loring Hills Avenue. 11. Roof Top Equipment Roof top equipment shall be screened or otherwise mitigated from the abutting condominiums. Such screening shall be approved by the City Planner, prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. In addition, baffles shall be installed in each exhaust fan to ensure minimal disruption to abutters. construction shall be carried out in accordance with the following conditions: a. Construction and blasting. Operating or permitting the operation of any tools or equipment used in construction or demolition work between the hours of 5:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m. the following day on weekdays or at any time on Sundays or holidays such that the sound therefrom creates a noise disturbance across a residential real property boundary) or the operation of drilling-and/or blasting equipment used in construction, reconstruction, repair, or demolition work between the hours of 5:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m. the following day on weekdays or at,any time on Saturdays, Sundays, or holidays shall be prohibited except for emergency work of public service utilities, or by Special Variance issued by the Building Inspector pursuant to the Salem Code of Ordinances, and notification of same to the Salem Police Department. b. All reasonable action shall be taken to minimize the negative effects of construction on abutters. Advance notice shall be provided to representatives of the Loring Hills Condominium Association and the Village at Vinnin Square Condominium Association in writing at least 72 hours prior to the commencement of construction of the entire project. c. All construction vehicles shall be cleaned prior to leaving the site so that they do not leave dirt and/or debris on roadways as they leave the site. d. A Clerk of the Works will be required at the expense of the developer as is deemed necessary by the City Planner. e. Roadways surrounding the development shall be swept by a street sweeper as needed to remove dirt and/or debris from roadways. 13. Deliveries No service deliveries by tractor trailer trucks shall be allowed. The Planning Department shall receive a copy of a letter sent to each vendor or service contractor indicating this restriction. 14. Violations Violations of any conditions shall result in revocation of this approval by the Planning Board. I hereby certify that a copy of this decision and plans have been filed with the City Clerk and copies are on file with the Planning Board. The Special Permit shall not take effect until a copy of this decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that twenty (20) days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed or that if such appeal has been filed, and it has been dismissed or denied, is recorded in the Essex County Registry of Deeds and is indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded on the owner's Certificate of Title. The fee for recording or registering shall be paid by the owner or applicant. Walter B. Power, III Chairman M5WP Cvla,A CITY OF SALEM HEALTH DEPARTMENT -,Z)7 BOARD OF HEALTH 9 North Street R013ERT E. SLENKHORN Salem, Massachusetts 01970 HEALTH AGENT 508-741.1000 July 11, 1990 0 John Serafini �- Attorney At Law 63 Federal Street c-0 Salem, MA. 01970 Dear Mr. Serafini: c.c c At the Board of Health meeting held on July 10, 1990, a motion was made and passed to conditionally approve the Site Plan Review for the Vinnin Associates Realty Trust, 123 bed Nursing Home Facility, in the City of Salem, with the following ammended Board of Health comments: I . The design proposal concur with the city Engineering Department and City Plumbing Inspector for utility tie—ins for drinking water, sanitary waste (sewerage) , gas lines and/or other utility service. 2. Prior to drinking water service being put into service it be tested for pressure and bacteria by a certified laboratory and the results submitted to the Planning and Health Departments in writing- 3. Employ an acceptable method for removal of all construction debris and any unacceptable excavation material from the site during construction. 4. Submit results of any 21E Tests for Health and Planning Departments in writing. 5. Employ an acceptable method or means for the holding and disposal of trash (rubbish) , and medical waste, after site development with a copy of this method sent to the Health and Planning Departments in writing. 6. Measures be taken to assure that air pollution due to odors and noise does not occur during and after site construction (i.e. air exchange units, ventilation, excavation, etc.) Hours of site work to be 7:00 A.M. — 5:00 P.M. Monday gh Saturday. ploy an acceptable method for dust and street cleaning control during site construction and submit copy of method utilized to the Health and Planning Departments in writing. SALEM HEALTH DEPARTMENT �) 9 North Street -s Salem, MA 01970 John Serafini July 11, 1990 Page 2 Comments continued 8. Prior to site start-up and also during site construction employ a licensed pest control firm for site evaluation and service with a copy of the service invoice sent to the Planning and Health Departments. 9. All backfilling be done in accordance with good engineering practices to prevent future damage to all underground utilities. Only acceptable back- fill materials are to be used. L0. The design must be in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws and the State Sanitary Code, Construction of Nursing Home Facilities. Very truly yours, FOR THE BOARDn OF HEALTH Robert E. Blenkhorn, C.H.O. Health Agent REB/jm cc: Beth Debski, Planning Department pity Hall yua'G Jt1 'crf± u119LSn Boas" "' le ss - on 0a. 3, i9 9 v ante with Cha sP th of 1958. D• B£� . � August 29, 199C.) Mr. Walter B. Power III Chairman Salem Planning Board Salem, 1Y1A 01970 | RE: Site-Plan Review � 123 Bed Nursing Home- _ � Vinnin Associates Realty Trust � � Salemv MA � � near Mr, Power: � � � As abutters & residents of Salem the following individuals have � several concerns that they wish to bring to your attention with � � regards to the Site Plan of the Proposed Construction of a 123 � Bed Nursing Home at 7 Loring Hills Ave. Norman 9ogn=ian James Kerbel �~ Hyman London Philip Popkin Mark Goldenberg � Norman Davidsnn � REPORT OF VARIOUS SITE-PLAN CONCERNS AND RECOMMENDATIONS � FOR THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF A 123 BED NURSING HOME AT � | 7 L8RING HILLS AVE. SALEM, MA � This document has been prepared on the basis of available | | Records, Surveys, Opinions, & observations of these and other � concerned residents" � �The Subjects Addressed include: � � � � A. Natural Environment � f B. Man-Made Environment C. Public Facilities , � D. Community Services � E. Human Consideration,, � F. Summary G. Appendix ^ Our concerns, along with the supporting data, will follow the format of indicating our concerns as it relates to various statements in the Environmental Impact Statement prepared by Charles F. Quigley, P.E. dated 6/29/9O (see appendix # 1 ) as follows- ` � � A.NATURAL ENVIRONMENT 1.Air �' r t Statement'.--On page one ( I. ) in the FTironrnental. Impact- St.udy,dated 6/ 9/90 (See Appendix # .1 )under the IV<atr.,ral Env.iroment Section the writer- says"Dust Gener`aLion cluring construction will he avoided by instituting a regular and c:Lo<..-_ely Supervised water spray application . " Concern-- Certain resid(--)nt:.s of Village At Vinn.in, Square have -.xper-J.encecl , when this same developer- was building r..tni..ts, t:he di_rst generated dUi-ing construction was incr-edible. The inside of their home=s had a film of dUst that lasted r-rn'til the sc)d was put on the gr-or..rnd . Is their- anyth:.i.ng that. can be reasonably done to rnin.i-mi e this from reoccuring to the Residents of Lcari..nr_1 Hills Cando and the neighbor-.ing Retail S'Lor-eS? • 2.Land SLcitement-On page. one ( 1 ) in the Envir-onmental Impact St.udy,dated 6/29/90 under- the Natural. Envir-onment Sectiioil the wr-i ter indicates 'that acc:or'ding to the Topographical Survey "grades generally sloping from the center of the site to its boundar.._ies. A Portion of the surface drainage discharges to a ponding area at. the West end of the:) site with the balance draining toward Vinnin Square s'tor-m water system. " Concern- There have. been occur-ances of an overflowing sewer manhole on that por-tion of Loring Hills Ave. adJacf=nt to the Proposed Constr'ucLion Site (See attached letter' dated 411'0/970., from Vinn.in Associates Reality Ti,ust .in Appendix :4 b ) . On ;ome occasions , it has been obser-ved that the over-'flow from the sewer manhole flawed into the storm drain and :into the underground piping system that goes under the Strop '< Shop into a neighboring pond that lir.^ads into the Forest River- Cori ser-vaLion Area The Developer', upon notif.i-cation , immediately responded and madE-) arreangement.s to dig out the blockage and stop the nvcpr-'f low Concerns are raised by some residents that we are now witnessing symptoms of a system close to capacity. With the introduction of an estimated additional 3 to 9,000 gallons per day of domestic sewage that will be developed by the proposed project andp disposed of through the existing sewer system, will the result be an overflow that may flow into nearby storm drains or even the A dead pond would be a disaster for the area. Statement-On page two (2) in the Environmental Impact 3tudy^dated 6/29/90, under the Natural Environment Section the writer states "Probings taken at construction locations within the site indicate ground water within five ( 5) feet of the surface Surface water at the wetland and / . � the pond areas is a year round conition . " � Concern- Mow is the building to be supported? Are pilings going to he driven into the ground . If so will this have an � affect on the neighboring Pond? Is the building going to have a concrete slab as e base? If so, will the pressure from the weight of the building have any displacement effects on the water table or the Pond? Will this cause flooding at the Loring Mills Condominium? In any case the proposed Nursing Home will be no higher than two (2) floors above ground " What precautions are being taken to protect the Pond from the effects of blasting the ledge nearby to construct the nursing home? Is it possible that it may divert the undergriund water flow? Statement-On page two (2) in the Environmental Impact Study,dated | � 6/29/5/0 the writer states "Liquid waste will be � transported through a 12" sanitary sewer. . . to a 12" � sewer in Loring Mills Avenue. '' �� . . _ (4) Concern- Certain residents are concerned that the existing 12" sewer will be inadequate to handle the introduction of an estimated additional 9 to 9,000 gallions per day of domestic sewage that will be developed by the proposed prnject^ The present sewage catch basin or drains now have to be cleaned twice a year because it is felt by certain � r concerned that the existing pipe system is not large enough to handle Loring Hills Towers, Village at Vinnin '] Square & Loring Hills Condominium. If the existing system is near capacity now how can the existing system be expected to handle the needs of the patients, staff & visitors of the proposed Nursing Home? 3. Water & Wetlands Statement-On page four (4) in the Environmental Impact Study, =� dated 6/2WID0 the writer states "Turbidity and pollutions levels with receiving waterways should not increase since catch basins will he equipped with bot sumps and grates.These units will be regularly maintained" Concern- Sumps are defined in the dictionary as a low area in ( / which water can drain . \/ / The writer does not indicate who will be paying for this maintainance" Is it the responsibility owner of the land where the sumps and grates are / located , or should the cost be by all the residents that use the piping leeding to the sumps and grates? Statement-On page four (4) in the Environmental ImpacF Study,dated 6/29/90 the writer states " . . . the existing high runoff rate of the existing terrain , due to ledge and steep slopes, will not be changed in total rate by this proposed construction . '' Concern- Many residents agree with the opinion expressed by Mr. Stephen J . Miller, P. E. in his 8/22/90 letter to the Salem Planning Board when he states " In order to meet the minimum requirement of two acres for the project, the site was extended to the adjacent pond . Since this extension close to the pond will be used by � the nursing home, increased foot traffic and wear and � tear will require increased maintenance which will � include more fertilizer and other chemicals. As a � result the increase in nutrients to the pond could be � substantial . � The additional nutrients from the proposed development could result in increased algae growth with oxygen depletion and fishkill . A dead pond would be a disaster for the area. " (see � Appendix # 7 ) . 4. Energy Statement-On page five ( 5) in the Environmental Impart Study,dated 6/29/90 the writer state "Electricity is the proposed power and gas will be used for heating . " Concern- It is our understanding that the parting area in front and on the side of the proposed Nursing Home will be luminated in the evening with flood lights for the safety of the Staff and visitors. What consideration has been made to shield the bright lights in the parking lot from the residents of Loring /»~ Hills Condo, and the residents of the Village at Vjn"jr � Square that have decks facing the Nursing Home from � � across the street. � � � � | � _______________________________ � � _ (6) May we suggest that the planning Board recommend that the developer plant a series of evergreen trees twenty (20) feet high and planted close enough so as to provide a solid natural screen along the entire portion of the property owned by the Loring Hills Condominum facing Loring Hills Ave.and to reduce present two (2) access entrances to fifteen ( 15) feet and include signage identifying the neighborhood as private property, restricted to residents and guests only at each of the two (2) entances, This natural screen will help shield the neighbors from the bright lights and help preserve their privacy and minimize the disruption of their present quality of life by minimizing the impact of the sights and sounds of IS wheel vendor dairy trucks, ambulances, etc " 7« / May we also suggest that twenty (20) foot evergreen trees be planted to help shield the bright light l from the view of the Village at Vinnin Square i^ ( / o � {} / 7«~ " Condominium as well . v, �~ See attached alternative Site Plan ,and Landscaping Plan (see appendix # 2 and # 3 ) " Concern- May we suggest that all lighting fixtures ( with exception of street lighting on Carol Way and Loring Hills Ave ) to be reflected inward toward the Nursing Home" � (7) 5. Noise Statement-On page five ( 5) in the Environmental Impart Study,dated 6/29/90, the writer states "Noise generated will be temporary construction noise taking place during a given construction period . " Concern- Has consideration been made to the neighbors that live across the street at the Loring Mills Condos to restrict both inside and outside construction hours to � be no earlier than 7 AM on weekdays and 8 AM on Saturdays and no later than 5 PM Monday through Saturday with no construction activity on Sundays and � "Holidays .U/ � � u ` � Has consideration been made to restrict the Drilljnq w � r ' [/' � and Blasting hours to he no earlier than 8 AM and no p � later than 4 PM on weekdays and No Drilling or Blasting L/ � on Saturdays, Sundays, or Holidays? � � May we suggest that the Planning Board recommend that the developer be responsible for correction all � damages, if any caused by the blasting during the construction process" In addition in order to minimize»/ any non honified claims ( ie existing settling cracks) ' � may we suggest an inspection of all abutting property �� (Residential & Commercial ) within one-thousand ( 1 ,000) Y�r feet from the property line of the construction project? Statement-On page five ( 5) in the Environmental Impact Study, dated 6/29/90, the writer states "Blasting and excavation noises will be well muffled due to the remoteness and boundary barriers" " and on page three (3) the writer states "The developement should affect 50 to 60 percent of the land area with bvilding " .Prrtions of the buildable land are hilly and � consist of 20 percent ledge. '' �� | � � (8) � Concern- Neighbors question on the remoteness of the proposed two acre construction site, when you consider that the boundary line of the proposed construction site is less than twenty (20) feet from neighboring Retail stores and less than sixty (60) feet from the Decks of some of the units of Loring Hills Condo. What safeguards are in place to protect the neighbors " � from the accidental rock flying through the window, or ° when the plaster walls crack , or when the noise and | ) vibration becomes intolerable? - � | i What procedures will be inplace for the abuttors to | follow, to return their property to the same condition | prior to any damages caused during the construction | process? How will these procedures be communicated to | the abuttors? � � � Statement-On page five ( 5 ) in the Environmental Impact Study, � � dated 6/29/90, the writer states " It is not anticipated that noise generated by this development will have any effect on human or wild life. " Concern- What safeguards are in place to protect the residents at the Loring Hills Condo from the noise and odors � generated from the roof compressors and Kitchen exhaust � Fans? Due to the closeness of the neighbors, may we suggest that the most absorbing sound baffles for the compressors and filters for the exhaust fans from the kitchen be installed in accordance with the city of Salem' s Health Dept' s rules and regulations. Concern-- Due to the closeness of the neighbors, we suggest that the Planning Board require that the administration offices be placed on the second floor of the building faring Loring Hills Condos rather than private rooms of the residents of the Nursing Home" � � � � (9) Concern- What safeguards are in place to pr Mw quality of life of the residents at the Lor-ing Hills Condo from the Noise of Tractor Tr mating delivers and pick--ups and t ~\ c/ of Ambulances on a daily basis. ]D- nue tc) the closeness of the residents of !"ring Mills Condos, may We suggest that the planning Board recommend to the developer the purchase and planting of a series of evergreen trees twenty (20) feet high and planted close enough sr as to provide a solid natural screen along the entire portion of the property owned by the Loring Mills Condomjnum facing Loring Hills Ave. and to redure the present two (2) Loring Mill= Condo entances to fifteen ( 15) feet and to include signage identifying the neighbor hood as private property, restricted to and quests only at each of the two entances" The planting of this nal--Ur-al barrier should provide a natural screen that will be sound in,zulation to the Residents of Loring Hills Condo and will serve as a natural setting for the residents of the proposed Nursing Home. See attached alternative Site Plan and Landscaping Plan (see Appendix # 2 and # 3 ) . B. Man Made Environment I.Land Use Statement-On page seven (7) in the Environmental Impact Study, dated 6/29/90, the writer states "Adjacent land is occupied by multi- story residential and townhouse condomin.Lums, high rise residential , commercial , business and conservation areas" " Concern- Many residents agree with the summary comment by Stephen J . Miller , P. E. in his 8/22/90 letter to the Planning Board of Salem when he states "Wouldn ' t it be much better to upgrade the area with natural landscaping to art as a buffer between the commercial section and the residential section rather than trying to crowd another busy commercial venture into a limited area. " �� 2.Architecture Statement-On page seven (7) in the Envirinmental Impact Report the writer states "Planning including parking required by the code. . . '' On page nine(?) in the Environmental Impact Report the writer states "Fifty-Seven parking spaces will be provided adjacent to the structure. '' Concern- It is our understanding , after observing the location of the fifty-seven parking spaces on the Plot Plan , submitted by the developer, that nineteen ( 19) visitor parking spaces will be located directly in front of the Main Entrance, and thirty-eight (38) Staff & Vendor parking spaces will be located to the side and rear of the proposed building . Concerns have been raised that the majority of the land area in which the nineteen ( 19) Visitor parking spaces are located on land that is either owned by the Village at Vinnin Square Phase 11 or part of the original Culdesac of Loring Hills Ave. What precautions are being made to safeguard the liability to the Village at Vinnin Square Phase Il and the City of Salem from any liability in case someone falls in the Visitor parking lot, or to compensate the abutors for the increased liability exposure and cost of liability insurance to the Village at Vinnin Square Phase 1 , and Phase 11 , Loring Hills Condo and to the City of Salem? Perhaps these concerns could be addressed by having the requirement that all of the abuttors to the 7 Loring Hills Ave Project be perminantly listed as Additional insured on the Insurance Policy for the amount of $10 Million by whomever owns the property at 7 Loring Hills Ave. It is our understanding that the cost to be listed as an Additional Insured is nominal . C. Public Facilities I.Water Supply / Domestic Sewer Statement-On page nine (9) in the Environmental Impact Study,dated 6/29/94, the writer states "The city water supply, according to the Fire Department and the Public Works Department of the City of Salem, is completly adequite carrying a pressure of 68 psi at the project entrance.Consumption will be approximately 10 to 12,000 gallions per day. " Concern- The estimate of 12,0e0 gallons of water per day or 360,000 gallions per month that will be demanded from the Public Water Supply by the proposed projert,concerns many residents. This project will be using approx ten ( 10) times more water that the entire Loring Hills Condominium. Based upon the 12 ,000 gallions per day estimate for the 123 residents of proposed project, this will represent based upon the following : Village at Vinnin Square I 65 Residents " II 100 " " ITI 35 " � Loring Hills Condo _38 total 238 238 units X 2 persons/unit X 110 gal per person/day � 52,360 gallions per day of present usage 12,000 / 52,360 = 23% increase from present consumption Residents are concerned of the adequacy of the City of Salem Pumping Station , in being prepared to increase it' s capacity to satisfy the demand of this project. As you are well aware the residents are responsible for the underground piping system on their private property, but they are concerned that they should not hear the financial responsibility for any future costs that may occur as a result of this project. � � � �� -- � ( 12) Concern- Although water pressure is within safety levels at the project entrance, certain unit owners of the fourth floor of the midrise building in Phase II are presently complaining of inadequate water pressure from their faucets and showers,and not from low volume toilet tanks. The Auxiliary Water Booster Pump for the Mid-rise Located at 50 Freedom Hollow may be inadequate, and we suggest that the Salem Fire Dept look into this matter to relieve the unrertainity for fire safety at this higher elevation " Statement-On page nine (9) in the Environmental Impact Study,dated 6/29/90, the writer states " It is estimated that 8 to 9,000 gallions per day of domestic sewage will be developed and disposed o through a gravity system existing on the site and connected to the City of Salem Loring Avenue interceptor sewer " " Concern- When you consider previous sewer overflows, with the � � most recent being on 1/20/90 and the recommendation � from a representative from McKey & Sons on 4/20/90 (see � appendix # ) that the main sewer lines should be � � flushed and cleansed on a periodic basis, many � residents are concerned that there is already a severe strain on the existing water supply and sewer system and agree with Stephen Miller' summary statement in his 8/22/90 letter (see appendix # 7 ) concerning his opinion , as a Professional Engineer, that the Environmental Impact Report submitted by the developer " It is obvious that much more investigation is required before moving ahead with the proposed project. We should determine what the real environmental impact will be on the surrounding area and to obtain hard data on the effect of the new loads on the city water supply and city sewer system" " Concern- Concerns have been raised as to whether the City of Salem Loring Ave interceptor sewer and pumping location will have the capacity to reasonably handle the new loads that will be demanded by the proposed project that were not originally planned when the 250 residents of Loring Towers,and the potential of 300 residents of the Village. � � � � Concern- It is the opinion of many residents that a more indepth Envirnmental Impact Report Study be required . In this way the Taxpayers of the City of Salem as well as the residents abutting this project can rest assured that this proposed project will not result in future water and sewer problems, for which they will be asked to pay. However, if the Planning Board derides not to require a more indepth Environmental Impact Study, but still has concerns, may we suggest a recommendation to tle. / developer and the owners of this project that they ,ru//d yl a $10 Million purity Bond to insure the Trustees of J \\/ \ \ Loring Hills Condominium, the Trustees of the various Phases of the Village at Vinnin Square and the Trustees of Loring Towers against any future out of pocket costs that may become necessary to upgrade the present water and sewer capacity" 2. Traffic Facilities �~ Statement-On page nine (9) in the Environmental Impact Report dated 6/22/90 the writer states "Pedestrian circulation will be on private drives and walks. Fifty- seven parking spaces will be provided adjacent to the structure, as shown on the plans, in accordance with the requirements of the zoning ordinance, which requires only 1/4 parting spaces per bed . '' _ ( 14) � Concern- The calculation of the minimum requirement to satisfy � � the State Requirement is as follows: 123 Beds X 1/4 = 31 Minimum Parking Spaces Required � It is our understanding , after observing the Site Plan submitted by the developer, that the proposed project will he providing the following parking allocations: Staff & Vendors 38 Parking Spaces Visitors 19Parking Spaces total 57 Parking Spaces Many residents abutting the proposed project are concerned , that even though the state requirement has been satisfied by the developer, the allocation of only nineteen ( 19) Visitor Parking Spaces will be totally inadequate" This concern was supported by an informal resident survey that was taken on Sunday August 26, 1990 (see `~ appendix # 4 ) . The purpose of this Survey was to Count � the Number of Actual Visitor Parking Spaces provided by eleven ( 11 ) similar size Nursing Homes within a five ( 5) mile radius of the proposed Nursing Home at 7 Loring Hills Ave. This Survey indicated , after allowing for individual variances of the number of beds vs the amount of visitor parking spares, that the average number of visitor parking spaces for a 123 bed Nursing Home should be 38 . Based on this survey an additional Twenty ( 19) parking spaces should be provided " It is our understanding that the Developer, James Zieff , has an ownership affiliation with an abutting property presently being used by the Kinder-Care Learning Center at 602 Loring Ave. Salem,MA . The Kinder-Care Learning Center is a day-care center that has approximately 35 unmarked parking spaces that are used Primarily between 7AM and 6PM Monday through Friday. The parking lot is not used on Holidays, Saturdays and Sundays" � � � ( 15) May we suggest that the Planning Board recOMM2ned to the Owners of the proposed Nursing Home that they or the developer inquire with the principals of Kinder-Care for permission to rent their parking lot from 6 PM through OPM Monday through Friday and during Holidays, Saturdays, and Sundays. May We also Suggest, that if this additional Visitor Parking Space is available, that the d2=10per construct a lightened Walking Pathway through the woods & Steps to the Rear EnteranC2 Of the proposed Nursing Home. Another source of additional parking spaces during weekday nights and Sundays and Holidays could be the sharing of the rear parking lot behind the abutting U S Trust Bank in the Mini-Mail which is located at approximately the same topographical grade level as the proposed Nusing Home. Concern- Certain residents of the Village at Vinnin Square are concerned for the traffic safety of the residents and visitors to the proposed Nursing Home. A portion of Carol Way narrows to less than twenty (20) feet between the Pond and the proposed Nursing Home. May We Suggest that the Planning Board recommend that a Rail Fence be installed Parallel to that portion of Carol Way that faces the Nursing Home. (see alternative Design-Plan , and Landscaping Plan in appendix # 2 and # 3 ) Statement-On page nine (9) in the Environmerntal Impact Study, dated 6/29/90 , the writer states "Vehicular circulation within the property line limits will be on private driveways shown on the plans. It is expected that vehicles will be mostly passenger vehicles with some vendor vehicles which typically support nursing home operations. '' � � � � | `w, � | | � � ( 17) D. Community Services 1 . Fire Statement-On page eleven ( 11 ) in the Environmental Impact Statement, dated 6/29/90 the writer states ' The Salem Fire Department is satisfied as to the adequacy of the fire protection system. '' Concern- Not knowing all the fire regulations which lead up this statement of satisfaction , many concern residents have great concerns regarding the ability of the Salem Fire Dept in being able to fight a major fire at this � proposed project located in such a congested area. It is our understanding that the City of Salem mates periodic practice runs within the Village at Vinnin Square so that each of the fireman at the different shifts will know how to maneuver through the narrow streets. � Certain concerned residents wish to recommend that the � Planning Board consider the costruction of a safety � � passage way between the rear of the proposed Nursing � Home and the Rear parking lot of the adjacient � U S Trust Bank , which is approximately twenty (20) feet from the property line of the proposed Nursing Home. Concern- In the interest of safety, a four (4 ) foot strip be painted on the sides of Loring Hills Ave And Carol Way that are abutting to the Nursing, Home and with signage reading "No Parking-Fire Lane" V- n _� � ( 1�) E. Human Considerations 1. Public Health Statement-nn page thirteen ( 13) in the Environmental Impact Statement dated 6/29/90, the writer states " Independence main+ence, recreation , snow and rubbish remnval / utility and other service costs paid for by � the nursing home will be an asset to the general � � population of the City of Salem. '' � � Concern- Many residents interpret this statement to mean that � � the City of Salem will be providing minimal services � for this project and will be receiving annual Real � Estate Taxes of an estimated $37,000� , " � � Certain concerned residents wish to recommend that the � Planning Board consider making their recommendation to � � the appropriate City of Salem Dept that the Real Estate � Tax Monies collected on this property be earmarked to pay for (or reinbursement to) the following : 1 " Installation of a Traffic Light at the | intersection of Loring Hills Ave and Loring | Ave" | | � 2" Continuous maintenance and repair of Loring Hills Ave. Along with sweeping , plowing , sanding and underground utilities be requires at all times during the life of the Nursing Home. Concern- May we suggest that the Planning Board recommend to the developer that he be resPonsable on a Daily Basis for cleaning Rubbish on the Site which has accumulated during the course of Construction . � ( 19) F. Summary The concerns raised by this report center around the contents of the Environmental Impact Statement prepared by Charles F. Quigley P .E. on 6/29/90 for the proposed 123 Red Nursing Home at 7 Loring Mills Ave. Through no reflection on Mr. Quigley, we as concerned residents, are of the opinion that if the concern=, observations, and studies are not made known to Professional and Reasonable persons such as Mr. Quigley and the Salem Planning Board ,, inaccurate conclusions may result. We hope that we, as Concerned Residents, have proved to you as responsible citizens of the City of Salem of the following - 1 . A recommendation that a more indepth Environmental Impact Study be required before moving ahead with this proposed project, to determine what the real environmental impact will be on the surrounding area,and to put an end to the concerns of the abutting property owners. 2. A recommendation of adopting the alternative set of 0~ Architecturally Rendered Design Plans submitted by o certain concerned citizens, which redesigned the Visitor, � Parking Entrance and Exit to maximize safety, which resulted in additional Visitor Parking Spaces. 3. A recommendation that additional Visitor Parting Spaces be investigated at the Kinder-Care and the U S Trust � Facilities abutting the proposed project as part of the � Boards fudiciary responsibility to the community before � moving ahead with this proposed project. � � 4" A recommendation of adopting the alternative set of \ K\ � Architecturally Rendered Landscaping Plans submitted by � ^ � certain concerned citizens, which redesigned the � landscaping of the Loring Hills Ave. area ajacient �n the � / proposed 123 Bed Nursing Home to minimize the Visual & " Noise effect to the abuttors and to minimize the disruption of their present quality of life" � � ^ , (20) 5. A recommendation of returning Loring Hills Ave hact to it' s 1�1-evious status as a Culdesac , in compliance with the May 2, 1.985 Salem Planning Board Decision , with the only exception to this culdesac would be the construction of twenty (20) foot opening , boarded by shrubs left and right, consistant with the abvt+nrs plantings, at the intersection of Loring Hills Ave. and Carol Way, t" he used as a secondary entrance or- exit for City of Si-Ilem Emergency Vehicles. "..I. A recommendation , that for pedestrian and traffic safety, that a Traffic- Light be installed at the intersection of Loring Ave and Loring Hills Ave" 7. A recommendation that the original two (2) lights on the field stone walls, that were (Jisc"nnected during the construction of Phase I of the Village at Vinnin Square, be reinstalled and maintained by the Nursing Home., 8. A recommendation that a significant number of signs Indicating "No Parting" & "Towing" on that portion of Lnring Hills Ave and Carol Way abutting the Nursing Home. 9" A recommendation "f defining the responsibility of maintenance of Loring Hills Ave" , both during rnnstrvction ( ie Meavy vehicles tearing up the road ) and when the Nursing Home is completed and operating . ----- — --- ' (21 ) We, as a group of concerned citizens, hope you will consider our suggestions in your recommendations for this proposed project. With your help I am sure that we can meet our rommon objective of mating the City of Salem a better place to live for all of us" Very truly yours, ______~_______ Norman Bogoy�ian mes Kerhel 35 Valiant Way - 65 Valiant Way Salem, MA 01970 Salem, MA 01.970 �|yYhan L�ndon Philip P^Kpkin ' H4 Loring Hills Ave G1 Loring Mills Ave Salem, MA 01970 Salem, MA 01970 Mark. enberg �� Norman Davidson 50 Freed��m FIC.)llow �~� 89 Freedom Hollow Salem, MA 01970 Salem, MA 01970 II / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH WITH SITE PLAN REVIEW UNDER SALEM ZONING ORDINANCE BY THE SALEM PLANNING BOARD FOR APPLICATION OF VINNIN ASSOCIATES REALTY TRUST FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A 123 BED NURSING HOME JUNE a 7 1990 wEEY No. 8536 0, Prepared by Charles F. Quigley, P.E. 67 College Avenue Arlington, Massachusetts 02174 y INTRODUCTION 3 , • The subject site is a portion of a previously approved subdivision approved by the Salem Planning Board in May of 1986. In preparing this document we used the Salem, Massachusetts Subdivision Regulations currently in effect as a guideline. Description of Site The subject site is located southerly of Loring Hills Avenue and northerly of Carol Way and is designated:as parcel "D" on Exhibit 2 of the definitive plan titled, Subdivision Plan - The Village at Vinnin Square, dated November 8, i 1985. The Planning Board unanimously approved this subdivision. The Certificate of Action, dated September 30, 1986 was filed with the Salem City Clerk on October 15, 1986. Scope of Investigation This document has been prepared on the basis of available records, surveys, and current guidelines used in the City of Salem, Massachusetts, as amended to date. Reference is made specifically to Appendix "A" of the subdivision regulations of the City of Salem, Massachusetts, entitled, "Requirements for Environmental Statement". Subjects addressed include: I . Natural Environment II . Man-made Environment III. Public Facilities IV. Community Services V. Human Considerations Our environmental impact statements, along with supporting data, follow. I. NATURAL ENVIRONMENT •F Air There will be no odors emanating from the.site during construction or anticipated after completion of the development. Dust generation during construction will be avoided by instituting a regular and closely supervised water spray application. ' No burning will take place during construction, therefore, no smoke will be present dur••ing or after construction. All excess burnable construction waste will be hauled from the site by a private collection contractor to approved waste disposal facilities. All other detritus, such as vegetation, I will be chipped or mulched in usable landscaping materials. The subject site is generally in line of prevailing wind currents from the southwest. Downwind entities from the site are as follows: a. northwest to north, residential apartments; b. northeast, retail and commercial , within 500 feet. No incineration of refuse or other activity which could adversely affect air quality is proposed for this project. All refuse will be handled within enclosed areas until removed by land carriers to approved waste disposal facilities. f Land A topographical survey of the site has been performed by Essex Survey Service, Inc. of Salem, Massachusetts. The results of the survey are incor- porated in the definitive plan drawings. Elevations on site range from 47.0 feet to 74.0 feet above Salem base, with grades generally sloping from the center (�,a of the site to its boundaries. A portion of the surface drainage discharges to a ponding area at the west end of the site with the balance draining toward Vinnin Square storm water system. Land- Continued • Geological conditions at the site are similar to those throughout the local area: ledge outcropping at the higher elevations and a topsoil over gravel as an overburden at the lower elevations. There is not a geological formation or soil type that can be considered as being of an unusual nature. Probings and test pits taken between ledge outcroppings by this engineer indicate that that portion of the site at elevations above 50.0 feet is sparcely covered with 2" to 3" of topsoil and 2" to 3'0" of gravel and silt, then refusal at bedrock. That portion at 50.0 feet or below is layered with topsoil and then gravel to 5'0" to 10'0" depths. The western end of the site lot "D" has a small pond which will be treated as a site feature on the west side of the easement road constructed. in 1972. • to Probings taken at construction locations within the site indicate round water within five feet of the surface. Surface water at the wetland and the pond areas is a year round condition. The site consists of twenty five percent exposed ledge or ledge with minimum overburden of an impervious nature, there- fore percolation tests were not performed, nor is pervious material a necessary characteristic for the subject development. Liquid waste will be transported through a 12" sanitary sewer crossing lot"D" in a north-south direction, thence easterly along the north property line on lot "D" to a 12" sewer in Loring Hills Avenue. All sanitary sewage will be disposed of by gravity through existing systems The land areas which will be permanently affected by construction will be those occupied by buildings and paved areasag-mng with recommended planted areas necessary to the livability, appearance and quality of the finished development. The major portions of the site development for parcels "D-1" • - 2 - Land - Continued • and "D-2" are planned at above elevation; 50.0. The development should affect 50 to 60 percent of the land areas with building ground coverage well within the 35 percent limitation allowed by the current zoning. Portions of the buildable land are hilly and consist of 80 -percent ledge. This very ruggedness of the site adds immeasurably to the 1y attractiveness and interest of the site development. The predominance of impervious soils along the steep slopes characteristic to the area indicates J the proposed construction will have minimal affect on the water shed area .kO�dY in general . Water and Wetlands At the completion, the lot "D-1" development, as zoned, will accommodate a one hundred twenty three bed nursing home by special permit unanimously • approved by the Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Salem. The water distribution system and supply has been installed at the developer's expense for this program under the R-3 zoning applicable to the subject site. On the basis of the above, it is estimated that domestic water demand on the public water supply will approximate twelve thousand gallons per day. � �, t° �' The major portions of the site are surrounded by steep ledge formations and the excavation will consist of mainly ledge material which will be used for stone wall landscape architectural features and all filling to subgrade. Loan and sod will be delivered to the site and installed on location as delivery takes place. No stock piling of materials of this type is expected. Due to the nature of the existing materials, no siltation or sedimentation movement is expected. Nature has formed its natural protection against erosion and sedimentation in the area. Flooding does not occur at the site and a storm drainage system • - 3 - Water and Wetlands - Continued • with strategically located catch basins accommodating new construction will control any sediment transport. The surface drainage system within courts and paved areas will be provided with catch basins and yard drains connected by storm drainage conduit to the existing storm drainage system in . Loring Hills Avenue. Land grading will be provided in accordance with Section III B of the subdivision regulations. Generally, areas adjacent to the buildings will be graded so as to accommodate intended use. Beyond building yard areas it is I intended to protect all natural vegetation and to preserve as much of the natural vegetation as possible throughout the new construction site. The proposed landscaping, with gentler slopes than exist, will tend to delay runoff peak level time. In addition, the proposed planting assists in • neutralizing concentration effects on surface runoff. " Turbidity and pollutions levels within receiving waterways should not increase since catch basins will be equipped with both sumps and grates. " These units will be regularly maintained. Additionally, the existing high runoff rate of the existing terrain, due to ledge and steep slopes, will not be changed in total rate by this proposed construction. Aquatic biota and habitat usage should not be affected since no change in waterways is anticipated as a result of the proposed construction. The existing pond and recreation areas at the west end of the site will not be disturbed. Ground water supply will not be affected by proposed P the ro osed develo ment. The construction is proposed on the site shown and this site consists .of,' a rocky impervious terrain. All surface runoff will be directed to existing waterways. 4 - Water and Wetlands - Continued rand An increase in flooding incidence is not anticipated since the develop- will not increase total runoff contributing to the existing waterways An areas. All sewage disposal will be through the City of Salem system presently existing at the site boundary. Energv Electricity is the proposed power and gas will be used for heating. Noise n a Noise generated will be temporary construction noise taking place V during a given construction period. Most of the sharp carpentry noises will VVV y rY be minimized as a result of pre-fabication of structural systems off-site. A 1 • Blasting and excavation noises will be well muffled due to the remoteness and boundary barriers. It is not anticipated that noise generated by this devel- opment will have any effect on human or wild life. [All normal day to day operational activity will take place within controlled areas of the proposed building] Local Flora and Fauna The site is bounded on two sides with residential development and bounded by commercial , retail and business to the west. Vegetation at the buildable elevations consists mainlyof scattered underbrush, thin topsoil covers and exposed ledge areas. The developer intends uto improve 25 percent of the lot area by installing a loam cover along with grass, trees, and shrubbery in a systematically planned manner for attractive residential living. Longer lasting deciduous trees such as sugar maples, paper birch, 5 - Local Flora and Fauna - Continued • and pin oak will be used in the landscape, together with smaller flowering trees such as dogwood and varieties of crabapple. Large evergreen material will include spruce hemlock, black pine and white pine. The shrubbery will be composed of numerous forms of rhododendron and azalea, holly, chamaecyparis, yews, juniper, mugo pine and floribunda roses. To enhance the overall effect, groupings of annuals and perennials will be included in a number of rock garden beds. No known rare or endangered plant, wildlife or fish species exist in the project area'. • _ 6 _ II. MAN MADE ENVIRONMENT h Land Use • The proposed project conforms to the R-3 zoning by special permit, unanimously approved by the Zoning Board of Appeals. The growth plans for the area and for the City of Salem--by-virtue - alembyvirtue of public need for modern nursing home facilities encourage support by responsible approving authorities in the city. Salem residents are placed in cities up to twenty miles from home as L � a result of the total lack of modern nursing home facilities in Salem. Adjacent land is occupicd by multi-story residential and townhouse " condominiums, high rise residential , commercials; business and conservation areas. Public transportation, commercial and shopping abut the site, with major shopping within one thousand feet. Common recreation_and open area_s__a_re planned within the site_ . Density Building One Type 123 Bed Nursing Home Height 25' Two floors , 49,200 square feet Site Area 2 Acres Building Coverage 28% t Paving 32% t Open Green Space 40% t c Zoning The subject site in in R-3 zoning, commercial zoning (easterly) , R-3 zoned areas (northerly and westerly), and R-3 zoning (southerly) . 'D Architecture The proposed development will be an architectural extension of the Village at Vinnin Square. The building will be a two story colonial struc- ture with a brick exterior along with traditional entrance and window treat- ments. Planning includes parking required by the code along with landscaping - - Architecture - Continued and secured passive recreational areas. The height of the structure will • —be, — -- - - -- be two stories-- - ----as r— equired by the code. Concrete frame, concrete foundations, brick exterior and fine exterior finish will highlight the construction. Fire control ; private utility cons- truction, private security, laundry, refuse disposal and collection, . road„. maintenance and lighting are planned. Nothing of historical or archeological significance has been a factor on the subject site or, to our knowledge, on develored neighboring sites. X. r� • - 8' - i III. PUBLIC FACILITIES • -I= 1; Water Supply The city water supply, according to the Fire Department and the Public Works Department of the City of Salem, is completely adequate carrying a pressure of 68 psi at the project entrance. Consumption will be approxi- mately 10 to 12,000 gallons per day. It is estimated that 8 to 9,000 gallons Per day of domestic sewage will be developed and disposed of through a P gravity system existing on the site and connected to the City of Salem Lori Avenue interceptor sewer. — 7�c«c - � • Storm drainage will be disposed of through a system of piping and swales to the natural drainage areas around the site. The system and total runoff should have little measurable effect on the receiving areas of the site with . the major runoff flowing, as it presently does, to the Vinnin Square storm system and the Forest River water shed. C Refuse Disposal Refuse disposal (approximately 3 lbs./person/day) will be performed by a private contractor complying with law and appropriate governing agencies. Traffic Facilities Vehicular circulation within the property line limits will be on private driveways shown on the plans. It is expected that vehicles will be mostly passenger vehicles with some vendor vehicles which typically support nursing home operations. Pedestrian circulation will be on private drives and walks. Fifty seven parking spaces will be provided adjacent to the structure, as shown on the plans, in accordance with the requirements of the zoning ordinance, which require only 1/4 :na.rking,;pace per bed. • 9 Electric power The project has a reservation with, and approval of, the Massachusetts Electric Company. Underground distribution will be used within the parcel as an extension of the present power program serving at the site. E Gas Adequate gas service for building uses, supplied by Boston Gas Company, is located in Loring Hills Avenue adjacent to the site. ? I • 10 - . IV. COMMUNITY SERVICES �.. Schools No impact on the school population is expected as a result of the project. Recreation Recreation within the property lines will be restricted for the use of residents of the facility. Recreation will be primarily of a passive type, including walking and sitting areas, in keeping with the expected age of the residents. Police The facility proposed is a one hundred twenty three bed nursing home. • Police protection for our abutting neighborhood is satisfactory and the development of this site with its private security should supplement and enhance the general security of the neighborhood. Few residents are expected to have vehicles (zoning assumes 1/4 parking space per bed) . Traffic will consist primarily of visitors. C Fire _ jJGi ,Q „y(4,w -am�.& �tX"P4�ar The building will be Class I construction completely protected by sprinkler fire protection. A 12" water main exists on the subject site. The Salem Fire Department is satisfied as to the adequacy of the fire pro- tection system. 7J Public Works • Two hundred and fifty feet of roadway frontage is. a public way. Storm drains, sanitary sewers and street maintenance has been privately performed. - 11 - V. HUMAN CONSIDERATIONS • Aesthetics and Human Considerations The present character of the area is a combinations of low to mid-rise apartment condominiums, high-rise apartment rental units, commercial and retail development. The subject site is bounded and developed on three sides by the above. The proposed land use of the subject site will be nursing home use. The development will comply with all requirements of zoning regulations currently in use in the City of Salem. The rugged topography, natural vegetation and landscaping incorporated into the design for the development minimizes any adverse effects_of_thg._ .neighborhood, along with e _ahutSors. The architectural treatment will be a continuation of the colonial type const- ruction contained in the Village at Vinnin Square. The proposed use is an • excellent transition from the commercial office areas existing at Vinnin Square to the current residential nature of the Village at Vinnin Square. The convenience for local residents to be housed in Salem_closP to relatives will have a positive effect over the long term. Parks-Recreation The development will not impact on the publicly held land near the site and reserved for conservation-recreation activity. No park areas or public areas will be removed from public reserves. Public Health The .development of the site will improve the standard of living and public health of all residents making use of the facility. Residents will be occupying spacious modern nursing facilities in close proximity to their families and shopping facilities. According to the Salem Hospital placement • 12 - Public Health - Continued offices, an average of forty-two nursing homes are called before placing a resident and usually at great distances from Salem. A local , modern, long term care facility, such as is proposed, will relieve, to some degree, a critical demand. Water quality, air quality and noise levels in the neighborhood will not be adversely affected by the proposed development . Acuatinxdz " Potential.,residents will find comfort, security and relief in the atmosphere of a new and efficient building in a quiet accessable neighborhood. " Independent maintenance, recreation, snow and rubbish removal , utility 1 and other service costs paid *for by the nursing home will be an asset to the general population of the City of Salem. ' • 13 - Appendix # 2 See seperate document for the Alternative Design Plan Alternative Design Plan will be submitted no later than 14 days of this report. ADDENDUM: Name Change of Plan From : Alternative Design Plan To N Proposed Site Plan by concerned abutters Appendix # 3 See seperAte dOCLAment for the Alternative L andscaping Plan Alternative Landscaping Plan will be submitted no later than 14 days of this report. ADDENDUMt Name Change of Plan From . Alternative Landscaping Plan To - Proposed Site Plan by concerned abutters APPENDIX -.1* 4 Informal Survey of Nursing Homes With.in a 5 Mile Rc-.1diUS With R Compairable. Amount of Beds as The Proposed Nursing Home at 7 Loring Hills Ave. Salem, MO Sunday Aug 26, 1990 NAMEE A",TUAL PROPORT I OVAL_ PARKING SF'A[,',ES PARKING SPACES Beverly Nursing Home 40 Heather- St Beverly,, MA ;77 1=1164 164 BEDS BlUberry Hill Healthcare Nursing Home 75 Brimball Ave. 9-1 1.23/134 Beverly, 11P) 134 BEDS Ledgewood Nursing Care Center 87 Herrick St. 96 1;'3/122 97 Beverly,, MA 122 BEDS Cedar Glen Nursing Home 44 Summer St, Danvers,MA 72 123/100 89 1,,-)0 BEDS Danvers. Twin Oaks Nursing Home 63 LOCUSt St. 67 123"I01 B2 Danvers, MA 101 BEDS Hunt Nursing 84 Retirement Home 90 Lindell St., 57 12 1?0 58 Danvers. NP) 120 BJ_-_DS Lynn Convalescent Home & Infirmary 655 Boston St. 56 12=;'f 105 = 66 Lynn , MA 105 Beds Dex Ler House 12.1 �� 0 Main St. Malden , 11A 719 123/1._;0 1.3o BEDS • Peabody Glen Nursing Center 199 Andover St, 122 123/142 1065 Peabody, MA 142 BEDS Pilgrim Rehabilition & Skilled Nursing Center 96 Forest St, 77 123/144 = 665 Peabody, MA 144 BEDS Jewish Rehabilition Center- For enterFor Aged Of The North Shore 330 Paradise Rd . 128 123/171 == 92 Swampscott, MA 171 BEDS total 336 836/11 Nursing Homes = 76 Ave Actual Parking Spaces Less 57 Proposed Parking Spaces 19 Add ' l Parking Spaces Required • L–––––––––—––––– fle* lx yrs Cf ifu v{ ��rlrltt, ��u�5nr}ll>r; tic'," w:. 7 Co-, c:'. 1::: A 11 uulvtq Tinarb �,.., Gtr ��rm Q.orrrtt CITY CLPP 'S p FFICE DECISION May 6, 11185 SPECIAL PERM11 SITC PLAT REVIEW Vinnin Associates Realty Trust/Mr. James Zieff 33 bedford Street. Suite 12/114 Lrxington, Mk. 02173 I On Thursday, April 4, 1985, the Planning board of the City of Salem held a public hearing regarding the application of Vinnin Associations Realty Trust/Mr . James Zieff for a Special Permit under Section R. Site Plan Review, of the Salem Zoning Ordinance, with respect to the construction of ninety—eight housing units off Loring Hills Avenue , Salem, Ml,. At a regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning board held on Thursday, • P.ay 2, 1985, cl.e board voted, by a vote of seven in favor, none opposed, to approve the application as complying with the requirements for the issuance of the Special Perm!: with the following conditions: 1 . All Work shall conform to Plan entitled, "Vinnin Village 71, Site Plan", dated March S. 1985, revised April 1 , and April 11 , 1985, stamped by Robert Vcnnc, R.P.E. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for Phase 11 , the land disturbed or damaged by development of Vinnin Village Phase l shall be restored to its former clean and/or undisturbed condition except for chose areas which have been or are presently under construction. It is the intention of this condition that the Developer be responsible for clearing rubbish on the site which has accumulated during the course of construction. Such areas for cleaning and restoration shall be defined by the City Planner. 3. The Developer shall cause all traffic exiting from Vinnin Village to utilise a roadway to be improved which now exists as a construction. road. Traffic exiting from Vinnin Village shall not be allowed to utilize Loring Hills Avenue. Such condition shall only be effective Upon the completion and paving of the roadway which now exists,as a construction road. The road shall be completed and paved upon the issuance of the fifty—first (51st) Certificate of Occupancy for Vinnin Village Phase 11 . Such road improvements shall be subject to the review and approval of the Conservation Commission, City Engineer, and City Planner. A f 1 . 4. A booster PUMP. Subject to the review and approval of thCeFCIL) Engineer and the Fire Department shall be installed to ensure adequate water pressure and flow for emergency fire use , unlesef1'f!n�(y:dPt�;�• unnecessary after future testing. Such determination shall be made prior to issuance of Certifi Utes of Occupancy for Ph e(�Y��!� .�C��R�,.K'S OFFICE �] 5. Sloped granite curbing shall be installed along all �LL1'Y ml9 s roadways/driveways, except as waived by the Planning board. 6. Location and screening of trash receptacles shall be subject to the appro0al of the board of Health, and shown on the above-referenced plan. 7. Refuse removal , road and ground maintenance, and snow removal shall be the exclusive responsibility of the Homeowners ' Association. 8. All sanitary sever pipes shall be constructed of PVC, or as approved f by the Director of Public Services. 9. A minimum of 3' of cover for storm drain pipes and 4' of cover for sanitary sewer pipes shall be required. 10. Headwalls at each drainage outlet shall be installed. • 11. Salt as a de-icing agent shall be prohibited, except in cases of extreme emergency. 12. All construction within the development shall be conducted in accordance With the following conditions: I A. NO Work shall commence before 7:00 a.m. on weekdays and 8:00 a.m. on Saturday$. NO Work shall continue beyond 5:00 p.m. No work st.all be conducted on Sundays. Inside Work of a quiet nature shall be permitted at other times. ' b. All reasonable action shall be taken to minimize the negative effects of construction on abutters such as noise, dust , fumes. Advance notice of the commencement of construction shall be pro- vided to all abutters in writing. e. A sign shall be posted at the intersection of Loring Avenue and Loring Hills Avenue directing construction vehicles to the construction access road and away from Loring Hills Avenue. d. All construction vehicles shall be cleaned in order that they not leave dirt and/or debris on the road as the leave the site. e. The Salem Fire Protection Code regarding blasing shall be strictly adhered to (M.C.L. C. 118 S. 10A and 527 C.M.R. 13.00) ' f. Drilling and blasting shall be limited to Monday-Friday only a between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. There shall be no drilling or blasting on Saturdays, Sundays, or holidays. RECD VI • 1 All construction shall be carried out in accordance with the Rules and Regulations of the Planning 1,040. w ql, rQi��hr Works shall be provided by the City only r pect o . utility installation on the cite at the expense of the developer and ■s is deemed nrcessary by C[ )CtE�MASWS Zblic Services or the City Planner. 13. Landscaping of the project shall Conform to plane titleand d, Meech "Landscape Plan, Vinnin Village 2," prepared by 30, 1987- a. Shrub diameters shall be as shown on scale plan referenced above . Y.ature trees shall be minimum caliper of 3" and shall be so depicted on above—reference plan. b. Shrubs and trees shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition. Should these plantings not remain in a healthy and thriving condition, the responsibility for replacement of such plantings shall be the developer or his successor in intereet . )4. Improvements at the end of Loring Hills Avenue to aid in traffic control shall be subject to the review and approval of the Director of Public Services and the City Planner. 15. Substantial violation of these conditions &hall result in the revocation of this permit by majority vote of the Planning Board. In the event of such revocation, no further Building Permits shall be issued. ' I hereby certify that a copy of this decision and plans have bren filed 1 with the City Clerk and copies are on file with the Planning hoard. This Special Permit shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that twenty days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed or that if such appeal has been filed, and it has been dismissed or denied, is recorded in the Essex County registry of Lccds and is indexed in the grantor index under tl.e r.ame of the owner of record or is recorded on the owner's certificate of title. The fee for recording or registering shall be paid by the otiner or applicant . WALTER B. P01,'ER,II I d�T Chairman, Planning Board u dey ZIEFF PROPOSED CO2ILT"S S1 . All work shall conform to Plan entitled "Vinnin Village 11 , Site plant,, dated Har . . E, 1985, revised April I and April 11 , 1985, stamped by kobert C. Veine , F.P.E. 2. Prior to commencement of construction, land disturbed or damaged by development of Vinnin Village Phase 11 shall be restored to its former clean and/or undisturbed condition. Such areas shall be defined by the City Planner. 3. Loring Hills Avenue shall be one way in an easterly direction from the intersection of Loring Avenue and Loring Hills Avenue to iEs end and traffic exiting from Vinnin Village shall not utilize such roadway and instead shall utilize a roadway to be improved which now exists as a construction road. 4. A booster pump, subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer and Fire Department shall be installed to ensure adequate water pressure and flow for emergency fire use, unless determined to be unnecessary after future testing. S. Sloped granite curbing shall be installed along all access roadways/driveways- 6. Location and screening of trash receptacles shall be subject to the approval of the board of licalth, and shown on above— referenced plan. 7. Refuse removal , road and ground maintenance, and snow removal shall be the exclusive :esponsibili.cy of the Homeowners ' Association. 8. All sanitary sever pipes stall be constructed of PVC 9. A minimum of 3 ' of cover for storm drain pipes and 4' of cover for sanitary sewer pipes shall be required. 10. Headwalls at each drainage outlet shall be installed. 11 . lmprovcment of the construction road for vehicular flow shall be subject to the review and aporova'1 by the Conservation Commission, City Engineer, and City Planner 12. Salt as a de—icing agent shall be prohibited 13. All construction within the development shall be conducted in accordance with the following :ondiiions. . a. No work shall commence before 7:00 a.m. on weekdays and 8:00 a.m. on Saturdays. ANo work shall continue beyond 5:00 P.M. No work shall be conducted on Sundays. b. All reasonable action shall be taken to minimize the negative effects of construction on abutters such as noise, dust , 'fumes. Advance notice of the commence- ment of construction shall be provided .to all abutters in writing C. All construction vehicles shall 6 cleaned prior to leaving the site d< The Salem Fire Protection Code regarding blasting shall be strictly adhered to (H.C.L. C. 118 S. l0A and 527 C.H.R. 13.00) e. Drilling and blasting shall be limited to Monday-Friday only between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. There shall be no drilling or blasting on Saturdays, Sundays, or holidays. f. All construction shall be carried out in accordance with the Rules and Rerulations of the Planning board. A Clerk of the Works shall be provided by the City at the expense of the developer as is deemed necessary by the Director of Public Services and the City Planner • 12. Landscaping of the project shall conform to plan entitled, "Landscape Plan, Vinnin Pillage 2," prepared by K. bell and dated Mar. 30, 1985 a. Shrub diameters shall be as shown on scale plan referenced above. Mature trees shall be a minimum caliper of 3" and shall be so depicted on above referenced plan. b. Shrubs and trees shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition. Should these plantings not remain in a healthy and thriving condition, the responsibility for replacement of such plantings shall be the developer or his successor in interest 13. improvements at the end of Loring Hills Avenue to aid in traffic acceleration shall be subject to the review and approval of the Director of Public Services and the City Planner. ._ -, .111111. 1. 1 1 � � . 1 .�� JJ. \ l.. la jr . . _ : •. 0.K 93 IIe�4] condos LtK' foll :1c ill Car::a^ sc:.r,:r.s } r for wit. to )c•v tnts yrtr. bc:urr u,c s' 1 L committee metes on to o:.her `' •••The drilling to such a bttLdrrgs nes ItU. bI E7 JOHN, O'CO`*%,rLL loving the school board nuisance for the nelghton," m News Su[I wasanangD told We board."The buildingsaround to the dl!e PT school p1 SALE _ Conrtructinn of purpose (d the rrstrictioat) is Doman ty giver the School op at another 86 condominiums al the ' that thea People art getUag Pciritinly to tell the School Com• bl �'innln YiU►ge complex eao to home, par to the nitrite .specUse needs that t of m Ahead, blit. complex tb►l warmer weather, they nredn't have," said Superiateadcal d al tx dlrturtKd b7 this • schools Henry J. O'Donnell } t+LLsly most of Lhe Concern+ New setfJngs may also gel more nrlghb4rs had with the prv)rcl ward]Councilor Juba R.Nut• pie out to see the mectingi, m she Planning board decided who came Lo the meeting I b1 7Turaday night. with about nine arra residents, "`Q�n�ea ..maple don't go Drvt•luper James Zletl will said De was s+1lsLed with the out of their neighborhoods." n have to 'bmlt the hour d have done 3, lot of calling down restrictions. "Somrtody muri 0'D neU said. ..people don't n( blasurs soft construction vehicles fand keep rom using ito the Plan°Lnt Department), ' ►phare want b get out and lave ti }{ills Avenue, a resideo• or tilt they bsunrd to the public' up here W the School Committee at Loren chambers," which have been F List street that leads to the pro- hearing,' ht told the nelgbbon. located since 19f.2 at the 1Slddlt irrt. arcord)ng to the conditions )4=r, had also 111kCd that School WILIL th of the speeW permit granted by Vinnln Ytliage tot tut o❑ from It he board. Loring lulls Avenue, •to make Before that the chambers tr. t 'Zlell .said construction sure the can d new resident were al the old'admtnlsVaUob(v.urkers are finishing tLe last of don t add Wo much traffic to the building on Broad Street, and at Bs unlu already approved for street, but the board voted to Lhe committee also traveled to bl the first phase of the project. allow traffic to go into the pro- the schools.That practice ended dl and arcresdyloLYloundationt Jett anLortngHills Avenue. but partly be the new re Lh for the 9t unlu In the second ex1tthroughroadtbeingbulllDy chambers were localtd to a .phase. At man? as &W coo. 2ieff. school, and possibly because the al dominlums ►n m -rue a ► = One construction road that School Committee and former mens ave c ropoese _or mutt teem Loring Avenue Into. )dayar Jeao 1 cvesqut Laud m �ni1yo 1 a e tic u'd`on a the Project U not Dung used by In Ctrl o toed on heights trucks coming to the site, some PreIV angry uvhdt al ct large D' those meetings, O'Donnell snld abort \ennin Square, at the ocighbors said• but those trucks „We were holding tbose cc Su;mpsco:t line. are using Loring Hills Avenue.iLg Bard -ordered meclingt l0 1951 and 19!C, deal- &s blasting rrqulr d for the [ri etl Pro monitor that traffic Ing with Pro osltion 2t4,sand o phase and inuc+scd traffic on more closely and to build a bar• they became very stormy. he at Loring Hills.�ventir came to the rite fen:ting trucks }raving the said. "1 think the School Com- w• April 4planning Boardmtcling project from Loring Hills r°iltrrWanted toretreat tosafer m to block the proposal, and Avenue onto the eonswctlin ground." discussion: was continued to road. also have to pave the Tbursdt7 nighL City Plauncr Zltff will Gerard 1:►tanaugh drew up the construction roLd atter 50 of Vie 7Tnr,L�y{S1 conditions for the second Con- new unlU are built, and all 1L1��) 1lla ,,.ruction phase after hearing welt Itsving the site will have r ,cep the residentscomplaints, be to so out cs ofthe Ilospital hes &Lid. No work oa the p'ojtct can neirhtorhoods. _ 111 b^Fin brfore 7's.m, wt'e.days Ziclf also agreed to installing SALE Id Salem flospftal d Sit m. Saturdays. according a booster pump to ensure ade cmploycc.s will demonstrate wl sin• quote water pressure for to lh^ eurditions, end only P new hcallh tare technology. &.1 I Licg or other quiet work can be emergent)' use and to lendscap• give vision tests and prepare a•1 1 done after s p.m. No work at all {ng requ'tremenu. Our concern ealth profiles free at the North da Can be done Sunday&. Drilling is ultimately to make jhe best Shore Shopping Center's annual Su and blasting will be Limited to product we can," his son, i,:;nday u,roucb Friday, bet. Stephen Zieff, sold after the V.C:o b a.m. and 4:50 P.M. meeting. , 7' �•ef�ci to -ailat = ey•ita�'e �'a� il CLty The area of Federal and S A LE kl — The Salem The Planning department la }teenage TraU will a in place also looking for appropriate Chestnut streets willDrineluded lIc this June, 11 b planner locations for signs that will be othmap, but will not he Gerard Kavanaugh said. placed along the trall to direct painted. The troll la the Dralnchlld of The troll which w W consist oI tourists to Vit line.The signs are . as end Doc group, comprised of 1 a painted red line extending still Dcing designed: ' throughout the historic center of Kavanaugh said mops of the ' merchants and museums interested d the city,will be funded by the U• trall are being drawn and w W De of the el t-10f; more museums Iors to tthe q', arcord�ng to tiavaaeugh reproduced by the time the troll' citytand helping Ouse lwho come unless private sources of tun• is Me readied. The tr►�,' which has Dteh to find Utes nY�`o� "'lee „ piugromtloruatd mndric rk fj 's"" ; 'y.• _;, ��a.:.' - clin l • • • . Vinnin Associates Realty Trust Real Estate Development 890-6466 April 20, 1990 Nancy Hearn Manager Loring Towers 1000 Loring Ave. Salem, MA 01970 Dear Nancy, On Friday April 20 we found an overflowing sewer manhole due to an obstruction flushed into the sewer pipe. We contacted McKey 6 Sons, they responded and removed the obstruction. After viewing the sewer lines he recommended that the main lines should be flushed and cleansed out periodically. The estimated cost would be at the rate of 100/hr with a probable • maximum of 16 hrs. or 91600. We. propose that this expanse be shared by all users, Lorin,q Towers 250 .- un.tts, Vi.Ilage or V.1nr.1n Square 1 (65 units), 11 (100 units), III (35 units) . 450 units $1600 maximum estimated. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. 4,Bes.ts9g rds,L. Z 'eff JLZ/wm cc: MacDonald 6 Lavers Da vi dson Levine • 33 Bedford Street, Suite 12/114, Lexington, Massachusetts 02173 r • August 22, 1990 . Mr. Walter B. Power, III Chairman Salem Planning Board 1 Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Subject: Environmental Impact Statement Dated June 29, 1990 Re: 123 Bed Nursing Home Vinnin Associates Realty Trust Dear Mr. Power: As an abuttor and resident at three Freedom Hollow, I have been reviewing the, "Environmental Impact Statement" by Charles F. Quigley, P.E. In summary, my opinion is that the report consists mainly of very • general descriptions of the proposed project, many qualitative statements and little data on the actual environmental impact on the surrounding areas and systems after the nursing home is placed in actual operation. Water Supply and Sewage If, in fact, there is an acute need for nursing home capacity, then most of the 123 beds will be occupied all the time. Therefore, there will be approximately 170 people in the facility 24 hours per day, seven days per week, all year around. Contrast this situation to a residential complex where most of the residents spend large portions of time away from their homes at work and at other duties. As compared to a residential use, the patients and staff of the nursing home will have a far greater impact on the water supply and sewage systems of the area. It is easy to imagine the continuous use of the lavatory facilities and other items .not typically used by apartment or condominium residents. • August 22, 1990 Envir. Impact Statement Page 2 Based on actual experience of the residents of the village at Vinnin Square, there is already a severe strain on the existing water supply and sewer systems. There have been several reports of low water pressure in a number of the high rise units. In addition, there were numerous reports of intermittent sewer odor problems in several units. An investigation concluded that the drain traps and piping within the units were satisfactory. Problems of this type can be caused by high gas back pressure in the downstream piping of the sewer system. This can be indicative of a piping system close to capacity.,of inadequate capacity in. the sewage pumping system. If we then add the loads of the proposed project, the above problems could become more severe for the existing units and could be a potential for major expenditures for the City of • Salem to enlarge the systems. Pond In order to meet the minimum requirement of two acres for the project, the site was extended to the adjacent pond. Since this extension close to the pond will be used by the nursing home, increased foot tr4ffic and wear and tear will require increased maintenance which will include more fertilizer and other chemicals. When this is combined with the new "open green space" of three quarters of an acre with similar maintenance requirements, the increase in nutrients to the pond could be substantial. At the present time, during warm spells, a large amount of algae grows in the pond with a resultant decrease in oxygen level. The additional nutrients from the proposed development could result in increased algae growth with further oxygen depletion and fishkill. A dead pond would be a disaster for the area. • August 22, 1990 Envir. Impact Statement Page 3 Summary It is obvious that much more investigation is required before moving ahead with the proposed project. We should determine what the real environmental impact will be on the surrounding area and to obtain hard data on the effect of the new loads on the city water supply and city sewer system. The pond is a classic example of a wetland asset and should be protected from further encroachment and potential pollution. Wouldn't it be much better to upgrade the area with natural landscaping to act as a buffer between the commercial section and the residential section rather than trying to crowd another busy commercial venture into a limited area. I think we all have the same objective of making Salem a better place to live. • Very truly yours, Stephan J. Miller, P.E. 3 Freedom Hollow Salem, MA 01970 f ; r r +r rl + " + Y'•}' ..TI > Yet 1'Y i\{ P+ / 1 - _ I `r 11<7 Furuec I Fxr.aow N<Iler.. wnJ. F � Mrt�AI Ldr aY/ L.7 Y/ O Q. YAC B.YYnc i . Rt I 1 0 I �\ � b� �d9'oo r• O •. ZB ~ � e u �P ri IB r a •1Dio 4y 9V a e PP ^. v ry EV o ra ZP i vM 4 VP I V J J rP Q r Flo r° - i ry I t o 0 Q y _ O y mq �V I I ' / b a ♦ / O V / 1 / I 6 � { i 6 7 I 3 O J J N o 4k i tl ow 1 � 2 i F iK o y U° in' rZ a N8 / Bow o LL a m s I I I �I wo Qm Z f y \l t AMssadluseits APR r �ItU CTL .�2IlPI1T, � 1990 1 � -Bazira of .Au�ezcl ` N'Pug FILL::_ DECISION ON THE PETITION OF VINNIN ASSOCIATES REALTY TRUST FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 7 LORING HILLS AVENUE (MAP 21 . PARCEL 96) R-3 Zone A hearing on this petition was held March 28, 1990 with the following Board Members present: James M. Fleming, Chairman; Richard A. Bencal , Vice Chairman; Edward Luzinski , Richard Febonio and Associate Member Peter Dore. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting a Special Permit in order to allow construction of a 123 bed nursing home in this R-3 zone. The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request for a Special Permit is Section IX D, which provides as follows: "In hearing and deciding applications for Special Permits, the Board of Appeal shall decide such questions as are involved in determining whether such Special Permit should be granted, and shall grant Special Permits with such conditions and safeguards as are appropriate under this Ordinance or shall deny Special Permits when not in harmony with the purpose and intent of this Ordinance. The Board of Appeals shall not have the power to grant any Special Permit where use of land or structure is specifically excluded from the district." In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests. guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. The Board of Appeal , after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the public hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . The proposed use is in harmony with the intent specified in the City of Salem Zoning Ordinance as it pertains to the R-3 zone with the grant of a Special Permit. 2. Various letters of support for the project were read, as well as actual testimony being voiced by health care professionals and others. 3. Opposition,in the form of letters, was read and actual testimony was also voiced by abutters and others. 4. The ownership and operation of the proposed nursing home would be by persons with long experience in this industry. They have owned and operated such facilites-in-the area. , f DECISION ON THE PETITION OF VINNIN ASSOCIATES REALTY TRUST FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 7 LORING HILLS AVENUE (MAP 21 . PARCEL 06) . SALEM page two 5. The need for nursing home bed space , as stated by petitioner and others, is very acute. 6. Petitioner presented an actual recent traffic count study for visitors, employees and delivery vehicles at similar facilities. 7. The 2 acre lot of the proposed nursing home is in close proximatey to an area of mixed uses, such as commercial and residential . 8. The proposed use of a nursing home would be less of a traffic burden than residential . The area is served by major roadways. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . The proposed use will promote the public good by meeting the need for nursing homes. 2. The proposed nursing home is in harmony with the intent of the Zoning Ordinance. 3. The proposed nursing home will promote the public health, safety convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the A Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions: 1 . Petitioner meet all requirements of the Salem Fire Department. , 2. Property Street numbering be obtained the the City of Salem Assessors Office. 3. All construction be done as per existing City and State building Code and as per plans and dimensions submitted. 4. Proper shrubbery shall be placed, and maintained in perpetuity, along lot lines and throughout the property with the approval of the Salem Planning Department. 5. Any and all dumsters shall be placed away from the present adjacent x ` =x condominiums site line and these dumpsters shall also be properly screened. 6. Property approvals, if required, be obtained from any and all other r . applicable City and State Boards or Commissions, such as, but not limited to, the Planning Board, Conservation Commission or Board of Health. 7. A Certificate of Occupancy be obtained. y_ 8. Petitioner explore, and make good faith effort to secure traffic lights for interseciton of Carol Way and Loring Avenue. 9. Petitioner shall abide by all decisions of the Salem Planning Board relative to traffic flow for,-this and adjacent projects. y g� 1:: �,3y ' I k •".�� tea' � +'� DECISION ON THE PETITION OF VINNIN ASSOCIATES REALTY TRUST FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 7 LORING HILLS AVENUE (IMAP 21 . PARCEL 96) , SALEM page three 10. Petitioner shall obtain rights. if required, to use Loring Hills Avenue. If,and when, such permission is obtained, petitioner shall be responsible for all maintenance. repair, snow plowing and the like for Loring Hills Avenue. 11 . Petitioner shall , in conjunction with adjacent condominium associations, work out a proportionate payment for shared common areas and facilities. 12. Developer shall cooperate with building a guardhouse or other safety facility for the condominium association on Carol Way or Loring Hills Ave. SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED 6�1011wJ Q /m� c and A. Be al , Vice Chairman ""0 A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, If any. shall be made pursuant to section 17 of the mss. General Lasa, chapter 808, and shall be filed within 20 days otter the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City clerk. Pursuant to Macs.l;en=rel Lass. chanter 808. Section 11, the variance or!pecial Pcrmit rrante4 imon,shall not tako effect until a copy of the decision, bearing th^cert&cation of the City Clark that 20 days have elapsed and no anpea has been hi^d,or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been d:enissaa or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and m-lexed under the name or the owner of record or is recorded and noted nt the owner's certificate of Title. BOARD OF APPEAL! i i w �p S/ CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS PLANNING DEPARTMENT ��oxar,,�a WILLIAM E. LUSTER �v �� ONE SALEM GREEN City Planner 01970 �� ',o` (508) 745-9595, EXT. 311 •��+ms�N� FAX (508) 744-5918 April 12 , 1994 Richard Salter President Grosvenor Park Nursing Center 7 Loring Hills Avenue Salem, MA 01970 RE: GROSVENOR PARK NURSING CENTER Dear Mr . Salter : On March 31 , 1994 the Salem Planning Board discussed the revision to the Site Plan for the Grosvenor Nursing Home. Specifically, the discussion pertained to the changes to the footprint of the Nursing Home. The Planning Board voted by a vote of eight ( 8) in favor , none opposed to approve the changes to the footprint which was shown on plan dared 4-21-91 as recommended by the Planning Department . If you would like additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at ( 508 ) 745-9595 ext. 311 . Sincerely, William E. Luster City Planner cc: Charles Quigley, F.E. EX\PB\GROSVN.AP r I n t4 I 1 9 B #1 56-C/kl � , >> '�x.' _ n •• � - � •� � �, N� ! � � !n ` �. t ) � {p`r � " � �� V � �1�� A 'f`aCE ..•C 'M�� ... . v.Xjrp.n.y'r.. f .� �- a%-»�, 4t �� w'C�»W ;x, _i^'. r'. y .� �w _ C ''T�f'rt�p��_.•r � _ car _ --- �"r�� li�l� �� - 1=ac.-icy �aod- — L1- tnq HVerL ye — � vY � nj VenU, 07� � I F N —43— w CN S r `bvs6 = Z � 1 on C � � n 3Ss x43 _ 16 4 C s. Y N a o 1650 )( -b56xZ = /Volt P— CSGY 3bCITUh) w l 43� n ;s Pv L V.%P-t . o n • S C3 �7 I � ovsy) B�ScaIC U ( � �i1 C 3 .o o pvn X 32- " =#960 O -00 l�vlV IZoo 5.y. x � 2Q--0 _ 34vD _ DO 1�1�Sc• =1 rte;RCALs¢ 5k6lvJvrts e-F c . Z D o o • (�D voo-oo A vt-nue — v Y { n3 V JZ, rl k-r P II rj S I r � d _43-- � . n � s r L3rtCon� i D s �6 3 = 12GC .1 S,y . i k -o ILG6 I x •vS6 = Zt l oh 3S5 x43 _ 1 6 4 C s. I �n t.� p Y • 5C x -0$`XZ. 190 T, ri CSGY 3ovTvn) rc, 43, f'i 3 f V L v-%rc C. o n C3Q7 17vvsy) ( I otic. . 3o ov) X 32- =�9bo o •.o 0 l��lvea��c Ileo S•Y• X $ 2. � = 3400 _ � O �uc. + f Z 00 D • (�t� !ot?ofgZ /5� ov0 •o0 Technical Memorandum t Grosvenor Nursing Home f 1 Salem, Massachusetts Prepared for Vinnin Associates ' Salem,Massachusetts Prepared by Vanasse Hangen Brustlin,Inc. July 1990 VanasseHangen Brustlin,Inc. Consulting Engineers VM and 101 Walnut Street Planners Watertown Massachusetts 02172 617 924 1770 FAX 617 924 2286 (] ❑ ❑ ❑ Memorandum Transmittal Meeting Notes Phone Notes To: Mr.James Zieff Date: July 26, 1990 Vinnin Associates 70 Weatherly Drive Salem,MA 01970 Project No.: 2698 P Prom: Traffic Operations Dept. Re: Proposed Grosvenor House Nursing Home Traffic Impact Assessment Salem,Massachusetts Vanasse Hangen Brustlin,Inc. (VHB)has conducted a Traffic Impact Assessment for the proposed Grosvenor House Nursing Home which is to be located on Loring Hills Avenue in Salem,Massachusetts. This memorandum addresses existing traffic conditions,traffic projections,and capacity analyses to determine geometric and traffic control requirements. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project, as proposed, is a 123-bed nursing home to be located on a parcel of land on the south-west side of Loring Hills Avenue north-west of its intersection with Loring Avenue. The site area of 87,000 square feet will accommodate the proposed facility,including parking for 57 vehicles, and is expected to be completed in 1991. As currently planned, one site ingress/egress drive will be provided on Loring Hills Avenue located approximately 300 feet north-west of Loring Avenue for employee and service access. Visitor ingress/egress will be provided by way of Carol Way. Service and emergency access to the visitor parking area will also be provided by a curb opening along Loring Hills Avenue. Figure 1 illustrates the site location. EXISTING CONDITIONS The area of review is bounded by Loring Hills Avenue, Loring Avenue, Carol Way and an existing 26-foot wide paved way that functions as an extension of Freedom Hollow from its intersection with Carol Way to Loring Hills Avenue. Existing roadway and traffic conditions in the study area are described below. 2698n901WPm-DN3 r0),1 •� Civ J "�• .]/fi ,� .,�. JAL Site LEM a� CET X Y-� �� ` `�\r� � j aim •{ /�� ,��. "t 0 / \ \�J � � ,• . SWAMPSCOTT �, o n CT i it muh4' Y' xaDkr Ana 502w,gec / '.�-^ .✓ .. Rock Beec U•les • Uncoln Hous' pie.s: h P r \ Po`nill; �r Beech`%+. Tedeson"y 1 ed Rock ra 2\- 3 ).. \ate SiAI/W/pps POln7 \ /9 0 1000 2000 Feet. Site Location Map Figure 1 2 Date: July 26, 1990 Ref: 2698 ROADWAY CONDITIONS Loring Hills Avenue in the vicinity of the site is a two-way, two-lane roadway that extends from its intersection with Loring Avenue,north-west into the Villages of Vinnin Square subdivision. Loring Hills Avenue varies in width from 38 to 46 feet. The posted speed limit in the vicinity of the site is 20 miles per hour. Land use along Loring Hills Avenue consists primarily of residential development with some commercial uses in the vicinity of the Loring Avenue intersection. Loring Avenue is a two-lane, nortb/south arterial providing connection with Salem to the north, and Swampscott and Lynn to the south. Approximately 500 feet north of Loring Hills Avenue, Loring Avenue intersects with Paradise Road(Route 1A). The two travel lanes on Loring Avenue are separated by a double yellow centerline. The width of the roadway varies between 40 and 42 feet in the vicinity of the project site. Curbing and sidewalks are provid- ed and the roadway surface consists of bituminous pavement in generally good condition. Vinnin Street is a two-lane,two-way minor arterial street. It runs in an east/west direction from Loring Avenue to the Marblehead town line where is becomes Tedesco Street. Approximately, 500 feet east of Loring Avenue,Vinnin Street connects to Paradise Road (Route 1A)forming a four-way intersection controlled by traffic signals. The roadway is approximately 35-feet wide. Land use in the area is residential and commercial. Carol Way is a two-lane, 36-foot wide roadway that extends from Loring Avenue to Freedom Hollow, a distance of approximately 350 feet. Asphalt curbs and sidewalks are provided along its entire length. INTERSECTIONS A. LORING AVENUE AND LORING HILLS AVENUE Loring Hills Avenue intersections with Loring Avenue to form an unsignalized three- way intersection approximately 200 feet north of Vinnin Street. The Loring Hills Avenue approach lane is approximately 19-feet in width and generally functions as a single lane for left or right hand turns. The Loring Avenue northbound approach is approximately 20 feet wide while the southbound approach is 18 feet,each consisting of one general purpose lane. B. LORING AVENUE AND CAROL WAY Carol Way intersects with Loring Avenue to form an unsignalized three-way intersection, approximately 400 feet south of Vinnin Street. Traffic approaching this intersection along Carol Way is controlled by a median divider. The Carol Way -� approach widens at the intersection to allow for separate left and right hand turn movements. The Loring Avenue approaches are marked at 18 feet,each consisting of one general-purpose lane. 2698/790/WPm-DN3 3 Date: July 26, 1990 Ref: 2698 C. LORING AVENUE AND VINNI NSTREET Vinnin Street intersects Loring Avenue to form a four-way intersection controlled by a STOP sign on Vinnin Street approximately 200 feet south of Loring Hills Avenue. The Loring Avenue approaches are 19-feet wide and each consists of one general-purpose lane with channelization for right-hand turns in the northbound direction. The Vinnin Street approach consists of one 12-foot wide lane. The driveway to the Village Shops retail plaza forms the fourth leg to the intersection and is located directly opposite the Vinnin Street approach. TRAFFIC VOLUMES Existing traffic volumes were measured both manually and mechanically in June of 1990. Manual turning movement counts were obtained for two-hour intervals during typical weekday morning,midday and evening peak periods at the following intersections: • Loring Avenue and Loring Hills Avenue • Loring Avenue and Carol Way • Loring Hills Avenue and Paved way • Carol Way and Freedom Hollow Mechanical recorders were placed at two locations for over 48 consecutive hours to obtain daily characteristics. Table 1 presents a summary of the existing daily traffic volumes for weekday traffic conditions. jTABLE 1 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES Average Peak Peak Hour Daily Hour "K"*** Directional Day of Traffic Traffic Factor Distribution Location Week (vpd)* (vnh)** (%) M Loring Avenue between Weekday 9,440 565 (AM) 6.0 54 NB Loring Hills Avenue and 755(PM) 8.0 50 NB Vinnin Street Loring Hills Avenue at Weekday 740 45(AM) 6.1 80 EB Proposed Site Drive 60(PM) 8.1 60 WB * Vehicles per day. ** Vehicles per hour. *** Percent of average daily traffic. 2698/790/"m-DN3 4 Date: July 26, 1990 Ref: 2698 rPeak hour volume networks were developed from the existing turning movement counts and illustrated on Figures 2 to 4 for the morning,midday and evening periods respectively. Turning movements at Vinnin Street were estimated based on previous count data for the intersection undertaken by VHB in June 1989. SPEEDS-LORING AVENUE Speed measurements were taken on Loring Avenue by a standard traffic engineering procedure using a device called an enoscope. The observed elapsed time for vehicles traveling a short pre-measured distance between two checkpoints is recorded. The speed is derived by dividing the observed elapsed time into the measured distance between checkpoints. Eighty-four of these observations were made during a weekday afternoon along Loring Avenue at the intersection of Carol Way and the intersection of Loring Hills Avenue. The results of the speed measurements are provided in Table 2. TABLE 2 OBSERVED ROADWAY SPEEDS (MPH)* Posted 85th** Speed Median Percentile Maximum Minimum Location Limit Speed Speed Speed Speed Loring Avenue at Carol Way: Northbound 35 30 33 36 26 Southbound 35 30 33 36 27 Loring Avenue at Loring Hills Avenue: Northbound 35 33 38 40 26 Southbound 35 28 33 40 20 * Based on forty-two observations per direction. ** The 85th percentile speed is the speed at which 85 percent of the observed traffic is traveling at or is slower than. It is commonly used for posting speed limits. As shown in Table 2, 15 percent of motorists tend to exceed the posted speed limit in the northbound direction at Loring Hills Avenue. These higher speeds can be attributed mainly to the downgrade along the northbound approach to the intersection. Otherwise,average speeds at both intersections are approximately 30 mph. 2698/790/WPm-DN3 t LORING HILL AVE rn 30 � �I 20--� I o N VINNIN ST k--40 MNd' 4— 'z j x304 3 8---* 00LI0 Cq to Q �0� NM 3 Q � Q c� 2 N CAROL WAY 00 j' N M 32� r LO LO 1990 Existing Figure 2 Morning Peak Hour Traffic Volumes LORING HILL AVE M r3 i j3_� 37� 1 abM I III VINNIN ST o L40 X35 ,oma `qtr' 2s- to00L 3 30� N N LO Q 2 J to N \� r27 CAROL WAY 8, h II a to 22—i N t 1990 Existing Figure 3 Midday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes LORING HILL AVE 0 ~-19 N M 20--� 3Z `1 30---� 04M VINNIN ST 0 L40 ONO X35 .) 14 ;-118 10-1 `) L 25p Ln t rn 3 35—� NNS Q O 2 D: O J 04'-t L16 �a r27 CAROL WAY 1 `l1 Ft �. 1990 Existing Figure 4 Evening Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 5 Date: July 26, 1990 Ref: 2698 SITE DISTANCE To evaluate safety associated with the site access and egress, stopping sight distance(SSD) measurements were conducted for the Carol Way and Loring Hills Avenue intersections at Loring Avenue. Stopping sight distance(SSD)considerations are basically divided into two criteria: approach SSD and exiting SSD. Approach SSD is the distance required for an approaching vehicle to perceive and react accordingly to a vehicle exiting a driveway. Stopping sight distance is calculated using a perception and reaction time of 2.5 seconds and a braking distance on wet,level pavements. When the roadway is either on an upgrade or downgrade, grade correction factors are applied. Exiting SSD is based upon a perception and reaction time plus the time required to complete a desired exiting maneuver after the decision to do so has been made. Values for exiting SSD represent time required to: (1)turn ]eft or right and to accelerate to operating speed of the street without causing approaching vehicles to reduce speed by more than ten miles per hour, and(2)upon turning left,to clear the rear half of the street without conflicting with vehicles approaching from the left. When a grade exists in the roadway or when larger speed reduction values are acceptable, correction factors are applied. Approach SSD is far more important, as it represents the minimum distance required for safe stopping, while the exiting SSD criteria is based only upon acceptable speed reductions to the approaching traffic stream. Table 3 illustrates the required and measured SSD at the study intersections. TABLE 3 STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE SUMMARY Direction Measured Exiting Required Approach Location of Traffic SSD(Feet) SSD(Feet) Carol Way Northbound 300** 220(33 mph) at Loring Avenue Southbound 225* 220(33 mph) iLoring Hills Avenue Northbound 425* 315(38 mph) at Loring Avenue Southbound 500 230(33 mph) J * Views obstructed by horizontal alignment and roadside]edge. ** Views obstructed by crest in vertical alignment. Sight distances were obtained by manual observations from positions at the existing west site drive and on the roadway at varying distances. The exiting stopping sight distances were taken from a point 10-feet back from the roadway at the existing drives and from a height of 3.5 feet. The distances were measured from the points where a 3.75-foot high traveling target came into view. 2698n90/WPm•DN3 6 Date: July 26, 1990 Ref: 2698 The required sight distance is based on the 85th percentile vehicle speeds, and adjusted for roadway grade. As Table 3 indicates,adequate stopping sight distance is provided. ACCIDENT HISTORY Three-year accident information for the study area was obtained from the Salem Police Department for the period of June 1987 through June 1990. The results show that a total of four accidents have occurred at the intersection of Loring Avenue and Loring Hills Avenue. One occurred in 1989 and three in 1990. Along Loring Hills Avenue, one accident occurred in April 1988 and in March 1990 a motor cycle traveling northbound on Loring Avenue lost control on the curve and hit a pole resulting in a fatality. No accidents were recorded for the intersection of Carol Way and Loring Avenue. FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS This section focuses on the probable impacts of the proposed development on the surrounding transportation system. Included herein is a description of the traffic associated with future background growth, an estimate of the proposed development's travel characteristics, and an assessment of the transportation impacts that will be created. TRIP GENERATION In studying the traffic impacts of the proposed nursing home, it was necessary to determine the amount of traffic expected to be generated. The trip generation calculations are based on trip generation data and rates from two sources: • Trip generation data obtained from representative nursing home projects in Massachusetts • The 4th edition of Trip Generation published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers(ITE). Traffic surveys were undertaken at the nearby Devereux Nursing Home located off Lafayette Street(Route 114)in Marblehead. The results showed traffic characteristics similar to previous employee,visitor and delivery traffic data obtained from other representative facilities,including the Bane Nursing Home in Winchester and the Wingate Nursing Home in Andover. tA trip generation analysis was performed for the proposed nursing home using both local and ITE data sources. The results are summarized in Table 4. 2698/790/WPm-DN3 7 Date: July 26, 1990 Ref: 2698 ' TABLE 4 TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON Vehicle Trips Based on Based on Time Period Direction Local Data* ITE Data** Weekday Morning Peak Hour In 25 5 Out 15 3 TOTAL 40 8 Weekday Evening Peak Hour In 3 20 Out 18 24 TOTAL 21 44 Daily In 135 155 Out 135 155 TOTAL 270 310 Based on employee,visitor and delivery information obtained for representative projects. ** Institute of Transportation Engineers,Trip Generation;Third and Fourth Edition, Washington, DC (1987);Nursing Home, Land Use Code 620 and 123 beds. As shown in the table,the ITE rates are higher than the local data for the evening peak period and on a daily basis. For purposes of potential impact analysis the higher rates will be used in this study. In addition, the evening peak hour rates utilized are representative of the peak afternoon activity for the proposed facility that will occur during the staff shift change at 3:00 PM,prior to the normal evening peak travel period between 4:00 and 6:00 PM. TRIP DISTRIBUTION/ASSIGNMENT The estimated distribution and assignment of new site-generated trips to the roadway network is shown in Table 5 and illustrated on Figure 5. These estimates are based on existing traffic patterns and consideration for potential service in the Salem area. 2698/79p/WPm-DN3 JA- EM z HAOBOR 15 15 is SALEM �N�,Ce 3 JEe-9 130 **N2�4 SWAMPS C ire is�k ik tr S age a I gi, Beac' , DIS I RockI e 3 ....... Off ROO Lincoln Houaz. PO Beac 13 Tedesco' socks 2 AOIW'POS Point rip Gut 5i S1 W—A--M P–fS - i'C - age 12 24 19 16 1000 2000 Feet 10 mHff—=TT<M rrT-711;�� Trip Distribution Map Figure 5 8 Date: July 26, 1990 Ref: 2698 TABLE b TRIP DISTRIBUTION/ASSIGNMENT Orientation Percent of Total Site Trips To/from the north by way of Loring Avenue 40 To/from the south by way of Loring Avenue 30 To/from the east by way of Vinnin Street 30 TOTAL 100 A. 1991 FUTURE TRAFFIC VOLUMES The 1990 existing traffic volumes were increased by 2 percent to represent future 1991 No-Build traffic volumes. In addition,traffic generated by the proposed expansion of the nearby Swampscott Mall, scheduled for completion in 1991 was included. This future condition corresponds to the year when the nursing home is to be constructed and occupied. The 1991 No-Build traffic volumes are illustrated on Figures 6 and 7 for the morning and evening peak hour periods. Projected site-generated traffic volumes were superimposed on the 1991 No-Build traffic volumes to produce estimated 1991 Build traffic volumes. These volumes are shown on the attached Figures 8 and 9 for the peak hours. Analyses were not under- taking for the future No-Build midday conditions since traffic activity in the evening peak hour are higher and would be representative of design hour conditions. The 1990 Existing, 1991 No-Build, and 1991 Build peak hour traffic volumes are summarized in Table 6. The table shows that the peak hour traffic volume on Loring Avenue south of Carol Way is projected to increase by about 1 percent due to the proposed project(relative to No-Build conditions)during the heaviest travelled period. Peak-hour volumes along Loring Avenue to the north and along Vinnin Street are projected to increase less than 3 percent. These increases are considered to be insignif- icant in relation to normal daily fluctuations in traffic. 2698%90/WPm-DN3 fi 1 LORING HILL AVE f-9 N r330 .� 1 18—� �n N WNNIN ST X41 1 x310 NM Q Q Z J M C14 r4 CAROL WAY j i '92 N(• 32-i `l 1 ■ LO ■ 1991 No-Build Figure 6 Morning Peak Hour Traffic Volumes i LORING HILL AVE 0 f-19 N M r-3 411 20-J 3� �1 30� '1 1 C14 NM 1 j VINNIN ST °f X40 C14 4 35 o-� 4 1 1 (' 25—► Ln in a �. P3 35� cv M ao Q O 2 J aCO `j X27 CAROL WAY 7-J t In 10—� 04 0 `1 1 0 I � 1 / r% 1991 No-Build Figure 7 Evening Peak Hour Traffic Volumes �i LORING HILL AVE to 010 1 f-9 N�N r3 �23 1 30 `l --d- 0 to 27--� `1 1 N N r p to SITE �+ ;-2 IN 25 WNNIN ST OUT 15t--48 M d `� TOTAL 40 n 1 -1 _12 r-311 8—+ 00 It 00 3 0 0. Q 2 0 L t j CAROL WAY 4 j' i i 1 s-J c*4 n � 00 'n i 1991 Build Figure 8 Morning Peak Hour Traffic Volumes LORING HILL AVE 10 t-20 roi 1 r-3 r 13 1 0 29--� ' 13-� `L (' 37---� fl r- 0 O LO SITE ;--7 IN 20 WNNIN ST OUT 24 M t 43 o rein r TOTAL 44 -j'j *--35 10-1 '11 (' 25--* Ln 00 Lr) Q 35-� `� M°° 3 0 Q 2 O J co r, j 4-23 CAROL WAY j i 27 i 10� f o� 14� � 1 to co 1991 Build Figure 9 Evening Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 9 Date: July 26, 1990 Ref: 2698 TABLE 6 TRAFFIC VOLUME COMPARISON SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS Percent 1990 1991 1991 Increase Peak Hour Existing No-Build Build Relative to Location Time Period Volumes Volumes Volumes No-Build Loring Avenue Morning 544 556 572 2.9 (north of Loring Evening 699 720 737 2.4 Hills Avenue) Loring Avenue Morning 1,129 1,152 1,164 1.0 (south of Evening 989 1,012 1,025 1.3 Carol Way) Vinnin Street Morning 734 749 761 1.6 (east of Evening 437 441 454 2.9 Loring Avenue) CAPACITY ANALYSIS The study area intersections have been analyzed using procedures found in the Highway Capacity Manual.1 The evaluation criteria for computing and quantifying level of service (LOS)for unsignalized intersections is presented in the Appendix of this report. Basically, level of service is a rating from A to F of the quality of traffic flow on a roadway facility. The results of the level-of-service analyses for the study area roadway facilities are discussed below. Table 7 summarizes the results of the capacity analysis performed for all unsignalized intersections in the study area. As shown,under existing 1991 No-Build, and 1991 Build conditions,many of the intersections operate at level-of-service(LOS)A during all peak hours. During the weekday morning peak hour the intersection of Vinnin Street with Loring Avenue will experience the lowest level of service of all intersections and it will operate at LOS E. The level-of-service for the 1991 Build Condition remains unchanged from the 1991 No-Build Condition for all intersections. The capacity analysis points out that the project- generated traffic will be accommodated within the existing roadway network without causing significant impacts on traffic operations. 1/ Highway Capacity Manual,Special Report 209;Transportation Research Board,Washington,DC(1985). 2698/790/WPm-DN3 10 Date: July 26, 1990 Ref: 2698 �. TABLE 7 UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS SUMMARY 1990 1991 1991 Existing No-Build Build Intersection Peak Hour ARC* LOS** ARC LOS ARC LOS Loring Avenue and Loring Morning 485 A 476 A 461 A Hills Avenue Evening 374 B 362 B 355 B Loring Avenue and Carol Way Morning 188 D 181 D 176 D Evening 222 C 214 C 205 C Freedom Hollow and Carol Way Morning 910 A 910 A 907 A Evening 941 A 941 A 928 A Paved Way and Loring Morning 887 A 887 A 887 A Hills Avenue Evening 897 A 897 A 895 A Loring Avenue and Morning 105 D 88 E 75 E Vinnin Street Evening 165 D 152 D 140 D * Available reserve capacity for the worst case approach - left turn movements from the minor street approach. ** Level of service. RECOMMENDATIONS A. SITE ACCESS Based upon the analysis in this report,the proponent intends to provide two access drives for employee and visitor use as discussed above. A main drive is proposed at Loring Hills Avenue, while a visitor drive is proposed off the paved way between Carol Way and Loring Hills Avenue. Parking for a total of 57 vehicles will be provided on the site. This number of parking spaces meets the local zoning requirement and is deemed to be adequate based on the anticipated use. As described above,the proposed nursing home facility will result in traffic increases that are considered to be insignificant in relation to normal daily fluctuations in traffic. The traffic analyses indicate that all intersections in the site area will continue to operate safely and below capacity during peak traffic hours under 1991 Build conditions. � i 2698t790/WPm-DN3 11 Date: July 26, 1990 Ref: 2698 '. B. OFF-SITE MITIGATION The analysis of the roadway network within the study area does not reveal the presence of either traffic operational or safety problems which could preclude the development of the nursing home as currently planned. For purposes of promoting safe traffic operations in the site area it is recommended that the posted speed limit along Loring Avenue be reduced to 30 mph. A reduction in posted speed limit for this section of Loring Avenue would also be consistent with the planned installation of future traffic signals at the nearby Swampscott Mall intersection,located approxi- mately 1,200 feet south of Carol Way. I r 2698/790/WPm-DN3 Date: July 26, 1990 Ref: 2698 1 APPENDIX 2696/790/WPm-DN3 Date: July 26, 1990 Ref: 2695 APPENDIX A. TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS CRITERIA 1. Performance Measures Level-of-service(LOS)is the term used to denote the different operating conditions which occur on a given roadway segment when accommodating various volumes. It is a qualitative measure of the effect of a number of factors ' including roadway geometrics, speed,travel delay,freedom to maneuver and safety. Level-of-service provides an index to the operational qualities of a roadway segment or an intersection. In practice, any roadway may operate at a wide range of levels of service depending on time of day,day of the week,and time of year. Level-of-service C describes a situation of stable flow and is generally considered desirable for peak or design traffic flow in urban areas. Increasingly,however, level-of-service D,which entails stable flow but more significant delays,has been considered acceptable for urban areas because of the cost and difficulty of making improvements necessary to provide level-of-service C operations. Level-of-service A is the optimum condition of"free flow"where roadway or intersection operating conditions are at their best. Level-of-service E represents an unstable flow condition where excessive congestion and delays occur,but which allows the maximum number of vehicles to pass in a given period of time. The lower end of this operating range represents the roadway or intersection capacity. Beyond this point,capacity is exceeded and breakdown conditions can occur. This is designated as level-of-service F. The efficiency of vehicular movement on area roadways is directly affected by the capacity of associated intersections,as well as that of the connecting road segments. As with the roadway itself, signalized and unsignalized intersection operations may also be categorized according to the level of service provided. Level-of-service C for an intersection also represents a condition of stable flow, with occasional backups behind turning vehicles. In the case of a signalized intersection at LOS C,a driver may,on occasion,have to wait through more than one red signal indication. Level-of-service A at an intersection represents a free-flow operating condition. Typically,the intersection approach appears quite open and turning ' movements are made easily. Seldom,if ever,does a driver have to wait through more than one red signal indication. Capacity of the intersection occurs at the lower end of level-of-service E and is characterized by long backups or queues of vehicles waiting to pass through the intersection. Delays are often substantial and will likely be more than one signal cycle in length. 2698I790/WPm-DN3 1 Date: July 26, 1990 Ref: 2698 2. Evaluation Criteria 1 Evaluation criteria used in analyzing area intersections are summarized below. All of the procedures presented in this section are based on the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual.2 • Unsignalized Intersections In capacity calculations for an unsignalized intersection or driveway, the assumption is made that the major street traffic is not affected by the minor street movements. The capacity of the intersection is a function of: the right turns into the major road;the left turns from the major road;through traffic crossing the major road;left turns into the major road;and the number of acceptable gaps in the through traffic streams which allow turning or crossing vehicles to pass through the intersection. The critical acceptable gap is defined as"that gap for which an equal number of drivers will accept a shorter gap as will reject a longer gap". Based on a gap acceptance function,the capacity of the minor approach can be determined. The difference between available capacity and existing demand is defined as reserve capacity and is used as the criterion for determining level of service. Table A-2 summarizes the relationship between level of service,reserve capacity and expected traffic delay. TABLE A-2 LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS* Expected Delay to Reserve Capacity Level of Service Minor Street Traffic ` 400 or more A Little or no delay 300 to 399 B Short traffic delays 200 to 299 C -Average traffic delays 100 to 199 D Long traffic delays 0 to 99 E Very long traffic delays ' ** F *: * Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209;Transportation Research Board, ' Washington,DC (1985). ** When demand volume exceeds the capacity of the lane,extreme delays will be encountered with queuing which may cause severe congestion affecting other traffic movements in the intersection. This condition usually warrants improvement to the intersection. 2/ Highway Capacity Manual,Special Report 209;Transportation Research Board,Washington,DC(1985). 2698/790/WPm-DN3 u M1 . u . ♦v,-IYu . .. YW:C: Location LGRINA AVE. FILE: LO Pi, YF� BALEM.NA. Oeerator 30EITHERC" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MONDAY . ,;. ¢cnn.. N� I-15".At TFR� 1. BESIN CC t Ch 2 ^w .11t r. 2 r t r r . �` r t r o ,, -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12:00 0 t t 30 42 35 41 '3 46 F t F i 1 t g; 1:00 t t 16 16 17 21 35. 3 1 F t 2:00 1 1 17 15 17 9 " i3 t S t 1 ! 36 ii 3:00 t t 14 9 1C 4 9 4:00 1 2 14 9 10 li l9 5:00 t t 43 20 46 38 34 21 1 ; 6:00 - ! i `-130 I58 tO E 13' 3 t f -- . t ; -41 _ 7:00 I ! 243 133 15E 1 I E - S ; x x t 5 Z.-2 B.00 t 1 309 275 308 22 y99 9:00 t i 220 228 257 '10 .36 24: 1 t ; t 1 F 2- 0:00 t 3 t 233 210 248 225 L t f ! ; t i i 24% 11:00 1 1 280 246 181 259 12:00.PM t t 276 293 _291 304 ! _ z t 255 96 1:00 t f 291 31E 300 .145 2:00 1 t .318 316 299 320 t ; 3 t t t L ! 3 S a 3:OC 3 1 314 356 328 NO 1 t F 1 S R i f 323 k 4:00 345 399 343 417 355 369 i S 1 t ; ; t 347 3=5 5:00 335 383 -72 7.712 425 414 t F Y t t F 4 6:00 3-15 283 384 289 400 31' 1 i t S t t t 1 3E6 29c - 7:00 223 264 266 253 304 301 t S F t f f t ; B:00 201 228 118 242 220 248 1 1 1 t 1 ; 4 -,t6 9:00 147 215 149 224 166 20 S 1 S t i R F 1 u~ 10:00 120 M. 113 125 M 322 t 1 t 3 3 t f 1 11:00 6B 67 25 73 92 74 S ! F I 1 t ; L 81 „ ----------------------------------------------------------y------------- TOTALS Isla 1962 4690 4717 4928 4750 1',°6 978 t ; Y + ! 47•34 4702 Cr'1—H - D 1; TOTAL --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------c---- 12:00 AN 1 72 76 7, 1:00 1 32 38 36 1 ! Y 1 2:00 1 32 16 26 3:00 I 34 17 Y Y 1 4:00 5:00 t 71 E4 6:00 t 288 275 18, ; # ; _ 28i y 7:00 1 476 40.9 503 ! t t 40E. 8:00 1 5S4 561 546 9:00 t 448 483 t 46i 7 ; t 47 i•IO:CO t 443 473 i t t .._..- 1 457 11:00 - ! .-- 516 540 t ! t t 5:2 J12.00 FM ! S7 596 i S ; t - 1:00 t 609 . . ._ 545 2:00644 . 619 3:00 ' 676 ... - 660 __. t ! ! Y 659 ' 4:00 744 760 714 ; 741 5:00 71E _704 B7- 6:00 658 '673 _ 710 7:00 485 519 605 t 3 ! ; 535 8:60 429 470 4:5 9:00 362 373 4C6 i ! i ; To, 10:00 243 238 244 t 1 i ! 241 11:00 135 158 366 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTALS 3774 9407 9678 2044 3 t ! 9436 SITE CODE : 00269BIl .AFiASSE. r'AN6"fl. ;ROSi.Ii! bu 1 Lecatier, : LORING HILLS A4E.SE7. OF— FILE; HItLS ' tbzath : DR./CONDOS SALE".MA. - -- - Gceratcr JF/TM - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S n Cr.CNO A, 4 Tu a f C:.A• 7 BESiN C 1 CII i ^4. 1 ^4 ^ rA 1 ^A A ! k i 'i 4111 i 4A L.W11 � �� ^. 1 -h ^ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12:00 914 1 t 1 4 C 4 C t k S 8 t 3 I:CO Y 1 i ti 1 C• 1 f S 2 S k 1 :� 2:0:0 1 i 0 C 4 C 3 2 F t :-, 4:00 1 1 1 2 1 2 i ? 1 t 5:04 t 1 a 2 0 € S € k 1 6:70 2 Y ° 11 ii: L , 7:00 1 3 7 36 6 35 7 32 S t t 8 S e 6 34 B:00 1 3 A 35 112 4c 7 31 S t € J rt 1 9 3' 9:00 f 1 1 /1 is 13 24 12 37 k S I 1 S 77 10:00 1 1 2 r 15 u t 1 Y 1 S t 11:00 P 3 2115 15 34 t S t t t 1 i 4 12:00 FM ---t 3 22 24 15 18 t .1 t F k k 1 1? 1:00 1 1 10 26 16 33 € S 8 t S 2 i 2 19 9 i' 2:00 t t 16 33 16 34 3 S t S J t 3:00 21 26 30 19 19 15 1 k 1 J = S f 8 211 4:00 26 23 44 29 31 .. 1 t S t i Y 3 I 5:00 37 21 34 15 1 1 S k 1 S S 1 6:00 25 1 15 T 40• 30 30 k J f 1 2 k k 7:0-0 23 19 20 19 12 17 t 2 8 t 8 f t S 211 9:00 2V 14 19 11 26 11 8 t I 1 1 k V 9:0C ? 10:00 111 14 1C 14 2 t ! J Y 1 S k 11:00 3 1 5 1 5 t 1 S S Y € € S 6 TOTALS 153 140 376 411 342 401 39 1117 J t t 1 1 S 330T.:S --------. -----p 12:00 Al 1 4 4 4 t t 1x00 200 3:40 t i L C i t J 4:00 t 4 7 2 1 f t -� 5:00 1 b 0 0 3 € f 6:00 3 17 11 21 t t J 7:00 _ 1 43 41 39 1 i Y 4 cfB:00 t 43 55 39 1 S 1 46 9:00 t 50 117 49 1 t t 45 - 10:00 3 40 41 1 1 1 1 40 11:00 t Z9 . _ 55 1 . - 1 ,� 1200 fM t -_ 46 43- 1 t I i 41 1:00 t 46 49 t t 1 t 47 -2,00 1 - 59 50 1 _ t 1 _._. t 54 . 3:00 46 49 37 3 1 ! i a -4:00 49 .73 53 i t 1 1 57 5:00 59 55 62 t 1 t -1 6:00 53 72 60 3 t 1 f 7:40 42 39 39 1 t t t 8:00 3B 30 35 1 1 t Y 9:00 16 27 33 t 1 t f 10:00 14 34 16 t i 1 1 21 11:00 5 17 11 3 t t 1 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTALS 313 797 744 156 t t t 771E ' � 0 lfenaase/Hangen -__ soa r° .e tits=3s . INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT CITY_ 541-£/h 14A55 DATE DAYof WEEK- INTERSECTION EEK_INTERSECTION GogbiO f!.'LC 2t). —^Lo2/pJG Ave. . JOB No. Z! ' - CALCULATED BY. - o -37 N C _ x m z o - c Z J WESTBOUND . °0 zc8 n 6 00 � 02driG A� EASTBOUND - STREET ENTERING PERCENT . TIME of COUNT— 0700 VOLUME OF FLOW — LoQJN G X/ Lt. RD 53 37 i 4!o PEAK HOUR — 2 dd JG Q 2.79 9a PM — oSoo - e40o Log NAr AJ W8 7-69 !i So ' P.H.F. = 95�o VEHICLES COUNTED ALL VEHICLES XXX 575 TRUCKS (XX) Z 3 TOTAL 5Z5 V /oo% PERCENT TRUCKS q.6 % VanasseHangan Brus[lfn,Inc. vmConsulting linginccn and Plannccs 101 Walnut tit.,Watertown,MA 02172 1 _ 617924 1770 1 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT CITY SALem MR55 DATE 6'0% 9O DAYof WEEK Fes= INTERSECTION_ Le12JrJG /!.'CG Izo , — Zclzd .IG /ace-• JOB No, ze98.w ' CALCULATED BY. 6 L ' a N 0 c x w 7 0 1 Z r v r z M N 0 v ' WESTBOUND ' a 333 to M 1 "1 / 7 �I M 3/8 6 M 1 LoRJr1G Acle- EASTBOUND daEASTBOUND 1 1 ENTERING PERCENT TIME of COUNT //00 — STREET VOLUME OF FLOW = /s ' 21 N:cc ¢t3, SQ $-1/ 7Y6 M -� HOUR: _ 12_a4_ 1.300 10J E3 335 6 o P w0 3'/8 i d v P.H.F. 1 VEHICLES COUNTED - ALL VEHICLES XXX '737 1 TRUCKS (XX) /3 TOTAL 1 717 Ll -/, PERCENT TRUCKS a,p % //��uTT Vanasse Hangen Brustlin,Inc. Consulting St.,Watertown, Planners . 101 Walnut Sc,Watcrtmvn,MA 02172 I ' 617 924 1770 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT rCITY 66LefM MRS5 DATEOK —o/- 20 DAYof WEEK 7 k INTERSECTION 402J,J G 14,'Lt- 26. - LD r- ' J 6 pJG . JOB No, CALCULATED BY: Gc2 . iN o so c ca0 c M � O I I ' i WESTBOUND . -� 31/0Lj 6 M LORd�G Adm• EASTBOUND STREET ENTERING PERCENT - TIME of COUNT= &: --� VOLUME OF FLOW LpkJnl /1 Lt 'P- . 56 O �o AM PEAK HOUR: = &01 /7no "02 Jt 4B HS'/o 2J e W 363 - y8% P.H.F. VEHICLES COUNTED ALL VEHICLES XXX 75 TRUCKS (XX) // TOTAL 1 757 ! /o0 91, PERCENT TRUCKS ;?.0 % Con uuse Hangers BrusUin,Inc. - '- VHBConsulting linginccm crs and Planners 101 Walnut St.,Watertown,MA 02172 617 924 1770 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT - COUNT CITY SALFM /'IAS5 DATE 6 - OL 90 DAYof WEEKFir INTERSECTION � a IVJOB No._ z6 9g- // ' CALCULATED BY: G a N _ c 37 15 3 - 1 � x � J O C c M t" J WESTBOUND . ^i 0 53a 17 T till V% ss8In _ Lo12;aG AJP EASTBOUND STREET ENTERING PERCENT T p VOLUME OF FLOW TIME of COUNT 0700 D900 ' t A 1ZM10 L wog 3 3 'bPEAR HOUR: Lon:,+ AV 565 E8 .4s 56 % pl.( o7v5-oBNS Loll) AJL W 5 '/o y7 9'0 P.H.F. 0 VEHICLES COUNTED ALL VEHICLES XXX //qZ TRUCKS (XX) 11B TOTAL 1 1107 a lOo '/ PERCENT TRUCKS N.n % Vanasse f/angen Brust/tn,Inc. vmConsulting Enginccrt and Planners . - 101 Walnut St,Watmuwn,MA 02172 }, 617 924 1770 =� INTERSECTION TURNING -MOVEMENT -COUNT CITY SALE M MAS 5 DATE 6 - 0/- 90 DAYof WEEK E&r INTERSECTION Lot: r1 G Adt — caaa,cc ww. J08 No. z[ 9—�_ CALCULATED BY: G R 1N o z8 L 39 C d 2 O C ° Z 0 0 � N v . ' WESTBOUND kq . a yz s T N / Lo2%.t6 Ave— EASTBOUND JCEASTBOUND _ STREET ENTERING - PERCENT TIME of COUNT— //" — 1300 VOLUME OF FLOW A IZ ,4 V 6 SCS 1$ �__}1'FAK HOUR: AM Lok),46 AJv Q 9 5/ '/o P /y I_dfup m A de- w 4'1/ :— '/7% P.H.F. _ . 9L�p VEHICLES COUNTED ALL VEHICLES 'XXX 91/8 TRUCKS (XX) 34 TOTAL I 9l/A 36 PERCENT TRUCKS % - , —///7�7�u�u��r�r VanasseHaugenBrus!/in,Inc. WI Walnut SL,Walcnown,MA 02172 617 924 1770 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT -COUNT CITY SALEM MA55 DATE 6-01- 90 DAYofWEEK F2L INTERSECTION doe ?SIG ca2R,L1_ w0.Y JOB No. �z 9/I CALCULATED BY: G.R r - i N c / 7 y3 - -I d S cu O C a Q V WESTBOUND . O /2 � y59 � a s 0 N9/ iz LORi.JG Ave. EASTBOUND - ' STREET ENTERING PERCENT TIME of COUNT= A6 °O — /S°' VOLUME OF FLOW 17 d Vo AM PEAK HOUR: /.//S- is 5 r a 2,15lr II z 5/ (fp /7 vJ/3 -7 P.H.F. ' VEHICLES COUNTED ALL VEHICLES XXX /o/o TRUCKS (XX) 2-V TOTAL. 1 10/0 a /oog PERCENT TRUCKS a,p % Vanasse Xangen Brust[!n,Inc _ Consulting Engineers and Planners 101 Walnut St.,Wateno .MA 02172 6179241770 .. .� INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT ; {� CITY Sac£wr MASS DATE '/-0/- DAYof WEEK f/Zz INTERSECTION 1-0020G N,`L( 20 e_& rHFt.7°2 2d• JOB No. z698 CALCULATED BY: G2 . - -O z D y8 /8 m N m _ r Ir Of -rorL ILO. p 9-t 1 a w ' EASTBOUND ' D z O F=- 3y la o ' z - STREET ENTERING PERCENT TIME of COUNT = 0700 — 0900 VOLUME 'OF FLOW 9: /a le% PEAK HOUR: Len.' IJJLL 20. S 1/8 66% PM oSeo—o yeo n 1) P.H.F. _ 87/d VEHICLES COUNTED ALL:VEHICLES XXX -73 TRUCKS (XX) o TOTAL 7a /oo °o PERCENT TRUCKS o % Varrassc!lmrbc�r IIrrrst/At,/wc. - -- - C.tutiulting linginccmand Planncta tOt Walnut St.,Watertown,MA 02172 617924 1770 - _� INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT -' CITY SALEM 1t7R55 DATE 6-6'/- 9.0 DAYof WEEK FR-1: INTERSECTION—Loa,7cs AIJLL 2n, J013 No. 7-69fi.�I CALCULATED BY: G Q � u } w IF �\ to n/eoro 2 R D. t If- 13 f/3 � 3 A9 37 I j . ! I ENTERING PERCENT STREET VOLUME 'OF FLOW TIME of COUNT.- - Loe.d� ; rl6 / /So EAKHOUR: _Z 46 i rt W' . 371 . Y b. . .. : Yr,P:HcP "_`:`:.`j9�D` .. . o rJ a ' RL, fa zl /6 �°' :;VEHICLES COUNTED AlL`,VEHK:LES XXX . /z - TRUCKS-==7777, .(XX) a . . TOTAL 129 .b, .. /bo �o. . ;:: . `PERCENT TRUCKS;. d•8 To Vattasng Engi ges Br anmrs,Inc. Consulting Cngineers and Plantters 101 Walnut St.,Wucrtown,MA 02t72 6179241770 t ' INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT CITY SSG MASS. DATE 90 DAYof WEEK INTERSECTION Lo2 •t d, & fr.`LL R4. — fyorzR 24 L a - Ce�,,im"O2 JOB No. zd9g CALCULATED BY: G e .1 17 3c� 0 4 i 13 0 f.D NecTo►c 2p, � 3 � a !61 113 1 r r STREET ENTERING 4ERNT:':. TIME of COUNT:. VOLUME WLokMG a,'LL SQ 17 A PEARHOUR•12.1A /E.L P- . N ZZ - /L 317o ..1ecT K fa 3 A/j GL Na VEHICLES .COUNTED copi pj pG - ROa via .5 O ALL VEHICLES . XXX // TRUCKS ` (XX) TOTAL 116. L /oa 00 '- PERCENT TRUCKS I•D`� � � EAFT-1990 RAM VERSION DATE 4-29-1988 ?HAPTER 10 : UNSIGNALIZED - 3 APPROACHE3 (P4GF 1 of 2) TIME:09: 11 : 17 LORING AVENUE AT LORING MILLS - EXISTING 1990 AM PK HR , LAST DATASETS LOADED OR SAVED � VOLUME= GEOMETRICS= � �� KEY: A- -B � | � C P�ENERAL CHARACTERISTICS N� POPULATION GREATER THAN 250,0()0: YES . CONTROLS: FROM C: STOP PREVAILING SPEED: 39 MFH AIN STREET # OF LANES: 2 LANES MAIN STREET APPROACH A - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LANE: N 0� MINOR STREET LANES -� -�� = APPROACH: C: LORING HILLS ' SHARED LEFT AND RIGHT TURN LANE: YES 11LARGE RIGHT TURN RADIUS OR SHALLOW RIGHT TURN ANGLE: NO RIGHT TURN ACCELERATION LANE ON MAJOR: NO SIGHT DISTANCE RESTRICTIONS ( in seconds) � APPROACH A: LORING AVE 8: LORING AVE C: LORING HILL LEFTS 0.O0 3.00 0.00 �� THRUS 0.Of) 0.00 u.(>0 � "° R1GHTC 0.0o 0.00 0.00 1APPROACH A: LORING AVE B: LORING AVE C; LORING HILL LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT VOLUME 0 249 10 11 268 S 17 0 20 PHF ().9O 0.9O ().85 ADO VOLUME 0 277 11 12 298 (> 20 O 24 PERCENT GRADE 0.00 -4.30 0.00 11PERCENT CYCLES 0.0O 0.()0 0.00 PASSENGEP CARS 97,00 97,()0 98.00 PERCENT LT TRU 2.00 2.00 2.00 PERCENT HV TRU 1 .00 1 .00 0.o0 -^ PERCENT CAR/HR O 10 20 O 24 CTEP 1 RIGHT TURNS FROM C:LgRING HILLS ONFLICTING FLOWS 282 ~` CRITICAL GAPS 5,0 J_ CAPACITY 903 �0� ACTUAL CAPACITY 903 IISTEP 2 LEFT TURNS FROM G:LORING AVE NB , ^ CONFLICTING FLOWS 20 ' CRITICAL GAPS 4. 5 - N� rAPACITY 1009 � `= CAPACITY USED 1% IMPEDANCE FACTOR 1 .00 ACTUAL CAPACITY 1009 995 L|N HCM - CHAPTER 10 : �IGNAED A LIZ - 3 APPROCHES (PAGE 1 2 of 2) � DATE:06-13-1990 TIME:09: 11 : 17 fORING AVEN�E AT LORING HILLS �- EXISTING 1�90 AM PK HR STEP 3 LEFT TURNS FROM C;LORING HILLS CONFLICTING FLOWS 592 CRITICAL GAPS 6^ 0 CAPACITY 487 ACTUAL CAP ACITy 485 � SUMMARY OF LEVEL OF SERVICE BY MOVEMENT MOVEMENT [`EMAND CAPACITY RESERVE LOS AVG DEL(S)EC) AVG QUEUE IT FROM B: 10 10;.,I9 999 A 3.60 0,01 � � � ALL MOVES FROM C: 44 647 603 A 5.97 O.07 � - � , � | � | � � � -�� `'^.,^` ' . .`"".`". ` ,E.`^^,. ",, . E 4-29-19S3 �� 1985 HCM - CHAPTER 10 : UNSIGNALI7ED - 3 APPROACHES (PAGE 1 of 2 ) � DATE:06-13-1990 TIME:09: 13:46 LORING AVENUE AT LORING HILLS - EXISTING 1990 MIDDAY PEAK -~ LAST DATASETS LOADED OR SAVE[} JVOLUME= GEOMETRICS= KEY: A- 'R | � �� m1GENFRALC CHARACTERISTICS - � POPULATION GREATER THAN 250,000: YES CONTROLS: FROM C: STOP PREVAILING SPEED: 30 MPH � MAIN STREET # OF LANES: 2 LANES MAIN STREET APPROACH A - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LANE: N ,�� MINOR STREET LANES APPROACH: C: LORING HILLS SHARED LEFT AND RIGHT TURN LANE; YES �� LARGE RIGHT TURN RADIUS OR SHALLOW RIGHT TURN ANGLE: NO RIGHT TURN ACCELERATION LANE ON MAJOR: NO LIGHT DISTANCE RESTRICTIONS ( in seconds) APPROACH A: LORING AVE B: LORING AYE C: LORING HILL LEFTS 0.00 0.00 ().00 THRUS O.00 0. 00 0.00 _ RIGHTS 0.00 0,00 0"00 — APPROACH A: LORING AYE B: LORING AVE C: LORING HILL LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT VOLUME O 333 15 17 318 (} 17 o 37 � PHF 0 .90 0,94 0.85 ADO VOLUME 0 370 17 19 353 0 20 O 44 PERCENT GRADE 0"00 -4.00 0.()0 PERCENT CYCLES 0.O0 0.00 0^0O PASSENGER CARS 97.00 77.00 98.00 _ PERCENT LT TRU 2^00 2.00 2 .00 PERCENT HV TRU 1 .00 1 , 00 0^00 � PASS CAR/HR 0 15 20 O 44 � � w� STEP 1 RIGHT TURNS FROM C:LORING HILLS CONFLICTING FLOWS 378 CRITICAL GAPS 5.0 | CAPACITY 815 ACTUAL CAPACITY 815 _ � � STEP 2 LEFT TURNS FROM B:L{}RING AVE NB - � CONFLICTING FLOWS 337 CRITICAL GAPS 4 " 5 CAPACITY 719 CAPACITY USED 2% IMPEDANCE FACTOR 0.99 ACTUAL CAPACITY 919 � | | - - - - - �N� 1985 HCM - CHAPTER 10 : UNSIGNALIZEn - I APPROACHES (PAGE 2 of 2) .�� omDATE:06-13-1790 TIME:09: 13:46 + LgRING AVENUE AT LDRING HILLS - EXISTING 1990 MIDDAY PEAK ^� STEP 3 LEFT TURNS FROM C:LORING HILLS - � � � CONFLICTING PLOWS 751 N� CRITICAL GAPS 6.0 ��CAPACITY 391 ACTUAL CAPACITY 389 � ` SUMMARY OF LEVEL OF SERVICE BY MOVEMENT � -�� MOVEMENT DEMAND CAPACITY RESERVE LOS AAVGDEL(SEC) AVG nUEUE - �� LT FROM B: 15 919 903 A 3"99 0^02 _ 0� ALL MOVES FROM C: 64 606 542 A 6. 64 0. 12 � - ' �0 � = ~~ mm � _ -�� -` -- -- ' ' - - � _ � p' CIFJCH PROGRAM VERSION DATE 4—.2-:.-19x=8 1.9'1 H[:M CHAPTER Iv : UNSIGNAL.IZED — S APPROACHES (PAGE 1 of 2) DATE:06—I.5—t 99c t TIME:r._i9: 1 5;04 ' LORING AVENUE AT L.ORING HILLS — EXISTING 1090 PH PK HR' `' LAST DATASETS ASETS LOADED OR SAVED VOLUME= GEOMETRICS= KEY: A— —i. C GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS POPULATION GREATER THAN 250,000; YES ' CONTROLS: FROM C:: STOP PREVAILING SPEED: 30 MPH MAIN STREET # OF LANES: 2 LANES MAIN STREET APPROACH A -- EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LANE: N ', MINOR STREET LANES APPROACH; C: LORING HILLS SHARED LEFT AND RIGHT TL1-N LANE : YE;_ LARGE -:I+=HT TURN RADIUSHALLOW RIGHT TURN ANGLE: NO RIGHT TURN ACCELERATION LANE ON MA.!OR: NO ' SIGHT DISTANCE RESTRICTIONS ( in Second.=_.) APPROACH A: LORING AVE 0, LORING AVE C: LORIN8 HILL L.EFTS 0.00 ?.00 0.00 i HR!_FS . .00 0.0C) 0.00 RIGHTS 0.00 0.A-) 0.0--) APPROACH A: LORING AVE B: LORING AVE C: LORING HILL.. LT TH RT LT TH RT L-; TH RT VOLUME 0 340 23 28 316 0 20 0 30 PHF 0.9(7 0.90 0.35 ADJ 'VOLUME: 0 378 26 31 351 0 24 0 35 ' PERCENT GRADE 0.00 --4.00 0.00 PERCENT CYCLES 0.00 0.00 0.00 PASSENGER CARS 97.0-) 97.00 98 .00 PERCENT LT 7FU.1 2.0t) 2.00 2.00 i rRCENT HV TRU 1 .00 1 .00 0.00 F'A98 CAR/HR C; 05 24 0 36 iI STEP I RIGHT TURNS FROM C:LORING HILLS CONFLICTING FLOWS: 591. ' CRITICAL GAPS 5.0 CAPACITY 805 ACTUAL CAPACITY 805 ' STEP 2 LEFT TURNS FROM P:LORING AVE NN [!.INFLICTING FLOWS 403 ' CRITICAL GAPS 4. 5 CAPACITY 90 CAPACITY USED _. .. IMPEDANCE FACTOR 0.9V ACTUAL_ CAPACITY 904 -' 1985 HEM — CHARTER: 10 : UN`3IGNF,L_TZEE, — 3 APPROACHES {PAGE _ of 2? _. DATE:06-13-1990 TIME C)?.-1.' .,-.4 LOWING AVEi'dUE A'!.. LORING HILLS — EXIS"!"ING 1990 PM P . H *' STEP 3 LEF_f TURNS FROM _.LCiRING HILL.''_; C.C!"•'i-'LiE'TIIIG FL_cw'_ CAPAC1TY 379 ACTUAL CAPACITY 314 1 SUMMARY OF LEVEL OF SERVICE BY MOVEMENT ' MOVEMENT DEMAND C:APAC.t i''i RESERVE LOS AVG DEL(SEC) A'v'G ClUEUE LT FROM Ec. 25 904 879 A 4 10 per;:_ ALL MOVES FROM C: 59 _51 492: CINCH PROGRAM VERSION DATE '4-29-1988 - � 1985 HCM - CHAPTER 10 : UNSIGNALI7Eg - 3 APPROACHES (PAGE 1 of 2) DATE:06-13-1990 TIMEr09: 17:03 LORING AVENUE AT LORING HILLS - 1991 AM - NO BUILD CONDITION � iLAST DATA5ETS LOA�ED OR SAVED � � VOLUME= GE[�METRICS = KEY: A- -B � | w� GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS POPULATION GREATER THAN 250,000: YES CONTROLS: FROM C. STOP PREVAILING SPEED: 30 MPH MAIN STREET # OF LANES: 2 LANES � , ii MAIN STREET APPROACH A - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LANE: 1\1 � �� MINOR STREET LAMES APPROACH: C: LORING HILLS ' N� SHARED LEFT AND RIGHT TURN LANE: YES � LARGE RIGHT TURN RADIUS OR SHALLOW RIGHT TURN ANGLE: NO , RIGHT TURN ACCELERATION LANE ON MAJOR: NO SIGHT DISTANCE RESTRICTIONS ( in seconds) APPROACH A: LORING AVE B: LORING AVE C: LORING HILL 0� LEFTS 0.00 0^00 0,00 � TKRU3 0.0O 0.00 0^00 RIGHTS 0 .0u 0"O0 0.00 � APPROACH A: LORING AVE B: LORING AVE C: LORING HILL LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT � N� ;OLUME 0 255 10 11 274 017 0 20 � mo � PHF 0"90 0.90 0,95 ADJ VOLUME 0 28311 12 304 0 20 O 24 �� PFRCENT GR��DE 0,(}0 0 -4"O0 0"0 - �� PERCENT CYCLES 0.00 0.00 0"00 PASSENGER CARS 97"3O 97 .00 98 .00 PERCENT LT TRU 2.O0 2.O0 2.00 . � �� PERCENT HV TRU 1 . 1 ,00 0"oO � PASS CAR/HR (j 10 20 0 24 � | STEP 1 RIGHT TURNS FROM C:LORING HILLS � CONFLICTING FLOWS 285 -' � N� CRITICAL GAPS - 5"0 CAPACITY 896 - ACTUAL CAPACITY - 996 - - STEP 2 LEFT TURNS FROM B:LORING AVE ill CONFLICTING FL3WS 294 - CRITICAL GAPS 4. 5 | � ^ | ~� CAFACITY 1003 CAPACITY USED 1% N� IMPEDANCE FACTOR 1 .00 � m� ACTUAL CAPACITY 1003 � �� 1935 Hatt - C:HAPIER 1 ) : UNSIGNALI'_ED - APPROACHES rFA E -r ') DATE:ri,-i ;-1990 TIHE;09: 1.7:( LORING AVENUE AT LORING HP_LS - 19'71 AM -- NO BUILD CONDITION STEP ?. LEFT Ti-..!RN : FROM C.L_ORINn HILLS CONFLICTING FLOWS bt CRITICAL GAPS 6.0 CAPACITY 479 AC:T UPIL. CAPACI I `r 47;; = SUMMARY OF LEVEL OF SERVICE BY MOVEMENT - I IOVEMENT DEMAND CAPAC I 1 `t' RESERVE LOS AVG DEL(SEC) AUG QUEUE LT FROM B: lC? IC?03; Uq' A 63 it,<t1 ALL MOVES FROM C: 44 6:_,8 594 A 6.Of, 0,07 f t _ 1 - 1 Mary .n rnuum z 1965 HCM - CHAPTER 10 UNSIGNALIZED - 3 APPROACHES (PAGE 1 'of 2) TE:08-01-1990 TIME:19: 59:37 RING AVENUE AT LORING HILLS - 1991 PM PEAK - NO BUILD CONDITION ST DATASETS LOADED OR SAVED �7LUME= GEOMETRICS= KEY: A- -B C GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS rPULATION GREATER THAN 250.000: YES NTROLS: FROM C: STOP PREVAILING SPEED: - 30 MPH IN STREET # OF LANES: 2 LANES IN STREET APPROACH A - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LANE: N MINOR STREET LANES 4PROACH: C: LORING HILL ARED LEFT AND RIGHT TURN LANE: YES LARGE RIGHT TURN RADIUS OR SHALLOW RIGHT TURN ANGLE: NO GHT TURN ACCELERATION LANE ON MAJOR: NO BHT DISTANCE RESTRICTIONS ( in seconds) PROACH A: LORING AVE B: LORING AVE C: - LORING HILL FTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 THRUS 0.00 0.00 0.00 �GHTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 PROACH A: LORING AVE B: LORING AVE C: LORING HILL LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT KLUME 0 350 23 26 327 0 20 0 30 JF 0.90 0.90 0.85 J VOLUME 0 389 26 31 363 0 24 0 35 RCENT GRADE 0.00 -4.00 0.00 PERCENT CYCLES 0.00 0.00 0.00 SSENGER CARS 97.00 97.00 96.00 RCENT LT TRU 2.00 2.00 2.00 PERCENT HV TRU 1.00 1.00 0.00 SS CAR/HR 0 25 24 0 36 STEP 1 RIGHT TURNS FROM C:LORING HILL NFLICTING FLOWS 402 ITICAL GAPS 5.0 CAPACITY 795 �TUAL CAPACITY 795 EP 2 LEFT TURNS FROM B:LORING AVE NFLICTING FLOWS 414 ITICAL GAPS 4.5' CAPACITY 894 UACITY USED 3% P PEDANCE FACTOR 0.99 ACTUAL CAPACITY 894 1985 HCM - CHAPTER 10 : UNSIGNALIZED - 3 APPROACHES (PAGE 2 of 2) TE:08-01-1990 TIME: 19:59:37 RING AVENUE AT LORING HILLS - 1991 PM PEAK, - NO BUILD CONDITION `t EP 3 LEFT TURNS FROM C:LORING HILL CONFLICTING FLOWS 796 ITICAL GAPS 6.0 PACITY 367 TUAL CAPACITY 362 SUMMARY OF LEVEL OF SERVICE BY MOVEMENT MOVEMENT DEMAND CAPACITY RESERVE LOS AVG DEL(SEC) AVG QUEUE tFROM B: 25 894 869 A 4.14 0.03 L MOVES FROM C: 59 538 479 A 7.52 0.12 L CINCH PROGRAM VERSION DATE 4-29-1988 _,985 HCM - CHAPTER 10 : UNSIGNALIZED - 3 APPROACHES (PAGE 1 of 2) - ATE:08-01-1990 TIME:19;42:05 - LORING AVENUE AT LORING HILLS - 1991 AM PEAL: - BUILD CONDITION = AST DATASETS LOADED OR SAVED VOLUME= GEOMETRICS= �EY: A- -B C ENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OPULATION GREATER THAN 250,000: YES ONTROLS: FROM C: STOP JREVAILING SPEED: 30 MPH AIN STREET # OF LANES: 2 LANES AIN STREET APPROACH A - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LANE: N IINOR STREET LANES PPROACH: C; LORING HILL SHARED LEFT AND RIGHT TURN LANE: YES JARGE RIGHT TURN RADIUS OR SHALLOW RIGHT TURN ANGLE: NO IGHT TURN ACCELERATION LANE ON MAJOR: NO IIGHT DISTANCE RESTRICTIONS ( in seconds) PPROACH A: LORING AVE B: LORING AVE C: LORING HILL LEFTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 ,HRUS 0.00 0.00 0.00 IGHTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 IPPROACH A: LORING AVE B: LORING AVE C: LORING HILL LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT VOLUME 0 255 20 24 274 0 23 0 27 jtF 0.90 0.90 0.85 J VOLUME 0 283 22 27 7.04 O 27 0 .32 PERCENT GRADE 0.00 -4.00 0.00 1ERCENT CYCLES 0.00 0.00 0.00 ASSENGER CARS 97.00 97.00 96.00 PERCENT LT TRU 2.00 2.00 2.00 fERCENT HV TRU 1.00 1 .00 0.00 ASS CAR/HR 0 22 27 0 32 TEP 1 RIGHT TURNS FROM C:LORING HILL ■ONFLICTING FLOWS 294 CRITICAL GAPS 5.0 PACITY 891 TUAL CAPACITY 891 TEP 2 LEFT TURNS FROM B:LORING AVE ONFLICTING FLOWS 306 CRITICAL GAPS 4. 5 �PACITY 992 APACITY USED 2% IMPEDANCE FACTOR 0.99 �CTUAL CAPACITY 992 1985 HCM - CHAPTER 10 : UNSIGNALIZED - 3 APPROACHES (PAGE 2 of 2) TE:08-01-1990 TIME:19:42:05 RING AVENUE AT LORING HILLS - 1991 AM PEAT; - BUILD CONDITION EP 3 LEFT TURNS FROM C:LORING HILL ONFLICTING FLOWS 626 ITICAL GAPS 6.0 PACITY 465 TUAL CAPACITY 461 1 SUMMARY OF LEVEL OF SERVICE BY MOVEMENT -MOVEMENT DEMAND CAPACITY RESERVE LOS AVG DEL(SEC) AVG QUEUE IT FROM H: 22 992 971 A 3.71 0.02 ALL L MOVES FROM C: 59 623 564 A 6.39 0.11 1 PROGRAM VERSION DATE 4-29-1988 INCH 85 HCM - CHAPTER 10 : UNSIGNALIZED - 3 APPROACHES (PAGE 1 of 2) TE:08-01-1990 TIME:19:44:16 LORING AVENUE AT LORING HILLS - 1991 PM PEAK —BUILD CONDITION I =' -LAST DATASETS LOADED OR SAVED FLUME= GEOMETRICS= Y: A- -B C NERAL CHARACTERISTICS PULATION GREATER THAN 250,000: YES CONTROLS: FROM C: STOP tEVAILING SPEED: 30 MPH IN STREET # OF LANES: 2 LANES 'MAIN STREET APPROACH A - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LANE: N INOR STREET LANES PROACH: C: LORING HILL SHARED LEFT AND RIGHT TURN LANE: YES ROE RIGHT TURN RADIUS OR SHALLOW RIGHT TURN ANGLE: NO GHT TURN ACCELERATION LANE ON MAJOR: NO tGHT DISTANCE RESTRICTIONS (in seconds-) PROACH A: LORING AVE B: LORING AVE C: LORING HILL tFTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 RUS 0.00 0.00 0.00 GHTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 tPROACH A: LORING AVE B: LORING AVE C: LORING HILL LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT FUME 0 351 30 34 327 0 29 0 37 F 0.90 0.90 0.85 VOLUME 0 390 33 38 363 0 34 0 44 IRCENT GRADE 0.00 -4.00 0.00 RCENT CYCLES 0.00 0.00 0.00 SSENGER CARS 97.00 97.00 98.00 PERCENT LT TRU 2.00 2.00 2.00 RCENT HV TRU 1 .00 1 .00 0.00 SS CAR/HR 0 31 34 0 44 IEP 1 RIGHT TURNS FROM C:LORING HILL NFLICTING FLOWS 407 fPTICAL GAPS 5.0 ACITY 791 UAL CAPACITY 791 IOEP 2 LEFT TURNS FROM B:LORING AVE NFLICTING FLOWS 423 'ITICAL GAPS 4.5 PACITY 886 PACITY USED 3% IMPEDANCE FACTOR 0.98 fTUAL CAPACITY 886 i1 - 1985 HCM - CHAPTER 10 : UNSIGNALIZED - 3 APPROACHES (PAGE 2 of 2) TE:08-01-1990 TIME:19:44: 16 RING AVENUE AT LORING HILLS - 1991 PM PEAK - BUILD CONDITION `tEP 3 LEFT TURNS FROM C:LORING HILL NFLICTING FLOWS BOB CRITICAL GAPS 6.0 VPACITY 361 TUAL CAPACITY 355 SUMMARY OF LEVEL OF SERVICE BY MOVEMENT OVEMENT DEMAND CAPACITY RESERVE LOS AVG DEL(SEC) AVG QUEUE ;t FROM B: 31 886 856 A 4.21 0.04 ALL MOVES FROM C: 78 514 435 A 6.27 0. 18 1 1 r � r r r r r r r ;'CIi`!CL, F•FOGRA M VERSION DATE 4- 0--i=3:3 i7 •` HCa4 — CHAPTER 10 : HNSIGNAL.IZED — 3 APPROACHES (PAGE 1. of E ) DATE:'_i6-1.?-1990 TIME:04:rT:00 =,L_ORING AVENUE AT CAROL WAY - EyrSriNG 1490 AK( PfAi( Noon LAST DATASETS LOADED OR SAVED VOLUME= GEOMETRIC^,= KEY; A-- —B C 11GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS POPULATION GREATER THAN 250,000; YES CONTROLS: FROM C: STOP FROM C RT LANE: STOP PREVAILING SPEED: 30 MPH, - MAIN STREET # OF LANES: LANES MAIN STREET APPROACH A — EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LANE: N MINOR STREET LANE. APPROACH: C: CAROL.. LAY SHARE ? LEFT AND RIGHT I!_ic:N LANE: NO LARGE RIGHT TURN RADIUS OR SHALLOW RIGHT TURN ANGLE: NO ' RIGHT TURN ACCELERATION LANE ON MAJOR: NO .. SIGHT DISTANCE RE:STRIC'TIDNE ( :in second=_.) APPFOAr_H F:: LORING AVE 9: L_ORING AVE L: CAROL WAY LEFTS 0.Q-1 its ilii 0.00 THPHS 0.t-r:_i 0.00 0.00 �. RIGHTS 0.Cpl 0._0 0.A--) � APPROACH A: L_-(.RING AVE B: L.ORING AVE C: CAROL WAY . LT TH AT LT TH RT LT TH RT VOLUME 0 532 8 — 558 rr 5 r: _y 11PERCENT GRADE . .00 3.nor , CYCLES 0.00 S 0.00 O.On PER-Emil L-_-- _ - ] PASSENGER CARS 97.00 97.00 98.00 PERCENT LT TRU 2.00 2 .00 2.00 PERCENT HV TRU 1. .Q-) 1 .00 0.C)) ' PASS CAR/HR C) 11 5 0 34 STEP 1 FIGHT TURN" Fhis_M C:CAROL WAY CONFLICTING FLOWS 596 CRITICAL GAPS 5.0 CAPACIT`r' - 64 - ACTUAL CAPACITY 64 ' STEP 2 LEFT TURNS FROM B:LORING AVE NB CONFLICTING FLOWS 600 CRITICAL GAPS 4. ',--1 CAPACITY 7 4. CAPACITY USED IMPEDANCE: FACTOR. .9? ACTUAL CAPACITY 74 :C r 1985 HCM -- CHAPTER 1+._) UNSIGNALI .ED - 3 APPRCtACHE:+ (PAGE 2 of 2) =TATE:06-13-i 990 TIME;O9.-^7.0:_) LORING AVEN1.1E: AT CAROL WAY STEP 3 LEFT TURNS FROM C:CAR.OL WAY CONFL 1 CTING FL-[WS ^„ ' CRI f I_Ai GAP"' t) CAPAC:I TY ACTUAL CAPACITY 194 SUMMARY OF LEVEL OF SERVICE BY MOVEMENT ' MOVEMENT DEMAND CAPACITY RESERVE LOS AVC' DEL(SECj AVG OUEUE LT FROM B: 1]. 74-� A 4.91 0.01 LT FROM C: 194 1:DEJ D 79 , 1 _, RT FROM C: ':4 642 60R A 5.92 0.01 _ ACINCH PROf-,Ri*l VERSION DATE 4-29-1933 '111985 HCM - CHAPTER 10 : UNSIGNALIZED -5 APPROACHES (PAGE 1 of 2 ) ^ ` LORING AVENUE AT CAROL NAY - EXISTING MIDDAY PEAK � LAST DATASETS LOADED [}R SAVED �, VOLUME= GE[}METRICS- � ` n� KEY: A- -B | � | | C � �� GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS � POPULATION GREATER THAN 250,000; YES CONTROLS: FROM C: STOP - �� FROM C RT LANE: STOP � PREVAILING SPEED! 30 MPH MAIN STREET # OF LANES; 2 LANES � MAIN STREET APPROACH A - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LANE: N � MINOR STREET LANES jAPPROACH: C: CAROL WAY SHARED LEFT AND RIGHT TURN LANE: NO LARGE RIGHT TURN RADIUS OR SHALLOW RIGHT TURN ANGLE: NO �, RIGHT TURN ACCELERATION LANE ON MAJOR : NO � SIGHT DISTANCE RESTRICTIONS ( in seconds) APPROACH A: LORING AVE 9: LORING AVE C: CAROL WAY �� LEFTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 THRUS 0 "00 0.00 0.cc) RIGHTS 0.O0 0^O0 0.00 APPROACH A: LORINS AVE B: LORING AVE C: CAROL WAY N� LT TH RT LT TH AT LT TH RT � ~= VOLVME S 425 16 23 456 0 8 0 22 PHF 0.90 0,90 0.85 11ADS VOLUME (} 472 19 26 507 0 9 0 26 � PERCENT GRADE 3.00 1^00 -2.00 PERCENT CYCLES 0,O0 0.00 0.00 1PA3S[NGER CARS97.00 97"00 98.00 PERCENT LT TRU 2,00 2.00 2 .()0 ^ � PERCENT H; TRU l .00 1 .00 0.00 PASS CAR/HR 0 35 9 O 23 � � STEP 1 RIGHT TURNS FROM C:rAROL WAY CONFLICTING FLOWS 481 � CRITICAL GAPS 5.0 � � . CAPACITY - 729 ACTUAL CAPACITY 729 �� STEP 2 LEFT TURNS FROM 9:L:RING AVE ND 1CONFLICTING FLOWS 490 CRlTICAL GAPS 4 ,5 CAPACITY 830 CAPACITY USED 41/. IMPEDANCE FACTOR 0^99 � ACTUAL CAPACITY 330 14'85 HCl'i -- CHAPTER 10 : UN IGNALI ED - 3 APPFiLACHES (PAGE 2 of 2) LORING A'V'ENUE AT CAROL WAY - EXISTING MIDDAY PEAS: STEP 3 LEFT TURN_ FROM C:CAROL. WAY CONFLICTJNG FLOWS 100 rRITICAL GATS 6.0 CAPACITY 268 ACTUAL CAPACITY 262 r SUMMARY OF LEVEL OF SERVICE ICE R`t MOVEMENT ' MOVEMENT DEMAND CAPACITY RESERVE LOS AVG DEL(SEC) AVC, QUEUE LT FROM k: 3 ff. 8' 0 795 A 4. 53 0. 04 LT FROM C: 9 262 254 C 14. 14 0. 14 RT FROM r:: ^T 729 706 A 5. 10 0.01 r r � r r r .. r r r r :11C911 H GRAM VERSION DATE -4-29-1988 HIM CHAPTER 10 : UNSIGNALIZED - 3 APPROACHES (PAGE 1 of 2) DATE:06-13-1990 TIME:09:30. 54 LORING AVENUE AT CAROL WAY- E:XIST'ING PM Pk. ' LAST DATASETS LOADED OR SAVED 'VOLUME= GEOMEIRICC;= KEY: A- -D , C GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS POPULATION GREATER THAN 250,000: YES ' CONTROLS: FROM C: STOP FROM C RT LANE: STOP PREVAILING SPEED: 0 MPH MAIN STREET # OF LANES: 2 LANES :' MAIN STREET APPROACH A - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LANE: N MINOR STREET LANES — IAPPROACH: C: CAROL WA`{ SHARED LEFT AND RIGHT TURN LINE: NO _ LARGE RIf=HT TURN RADIUS OR SHALLOW RIGHT TURN ANGLE: NO ' RiLi—tf ; UrVT ACCELERATION LFt)41L ON i•1riJC+r•,: ),t< - SIGHT DISTANCE RESTRICTION`-:i ( in seconds) APPROACH A:: L-tORING AVE8: L_ORING AVE C: CAROL WAY LEFTS 0.00 0..00 0.DO THRUS r .0s,_) 0.00 0.01.*.) RIGHT'S 0.0;-) 0.00 0. i j APPROACH A: L..OR I NG AVE 8: LORING AVE C: CAROL WAY LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT' VOLUME 0 4 14 29 491 0 7 0 10 - Fill= ii F,f yc` . C)nR1 - -`} Etc1 (yr..i - ADA VOLUME i ,' 1;= �,:¢i, i) � it 12 PERCENT GRADE 3.00 3.00 _.. :„a PERCENT CYCLES 0.00 0.00 0.00 PASSENGER CARS 97.00 97.00 98.00 PERCENT LT TRU 2.Q-i 2.ori :. .00 PERCENT EIV TRU 1 .00 1 .00 0.00 ' PASS CAR/HR ._) 44 7 0 11 STEP 1 RIGHT TURNS FROM C:C:AROL WAY CONFLICTING FLOWS 518 CRITICAL GAPS 6.0 CAPACITY 700 ACTUAL CAPACIT`{ 700 STEP 2 LE17T TURN'S FROM 9,LORIN6 A'VE NR CONFLICTING FLOWS 526 CRITICAL GAPS 4. 5 CAPACITY 801 CAPACITY USED IMPEDANCE FACTOR 0.97 ACTUAL CAPACITY 801 - 0� 1985 H�M - CHAPTER 10 : UNSIGNALJZED - 3 APPROACHES (PAGE 2 of 2) °= DATE:06-13-1990 TIME:09:30:54 � LORING AVENUE AT CAROL WAY- EXISTING PM PK � STEP 3 LEFT TURNS FROM C:CAROL NAY [�gNFLICTING FLOWS 1096 N� CRITICAL GAPS 6.0 � CAPACITY 237 ACTUAL CAPACITY 230 SUMMARY OF LEVEL OF SERVICE BY MOVEMENT MOVEMENT DEMAND CAPACITY RESERVE LOS AVG DEL(SEC) AVS QUEUE w� LT FROM B: 44 801 757 A 4,75 0,06 . 0� LT FROM C; 7 230 222 C 16. 18 0^20 ~~ RT FROM C: 11 ' 700 690 A 5.22 - 0.011- � - -~ � � -- � ' - ' CIPS;^_.H PROGRAM VERSION DATE 4 -9-1?8!9 i985; HCM - CHAPTER 10 : UNSIGNAL17ED - APPROACHES (PAGE 1 of DATE:t)b-1 -1.99ir TIME:'r'9:32: 5 � LORING AVENUE Al CAROL WAY — 1.991 AM Pk:: - N'D BUILD LAST DATASETS LOADED OF' SA'V'ED ' VOLUME GE0M17TF•:I CS=. F::EY: A- -H C ' GEhiERAL CHARACTERISTICS PC!!='I_q_AT I ON GF EATER THAN 2.n:r o tat)t>: 'YES CONTROLS: FROM C. STOP FROM C RT LANE. STOP PREVAILING SPEED: '0 MPH MAIN STREET # OF LANES. 2 LANES ' MAIN STREET APPROACH A - EXCLUSI',.=E RIGHT TURN LANE. N MINOR STREET LANES O.-CH. - A�' 'Fnl 5—rl, i s t_iyF:'ui- W'-1 .ql_.-H.L-:ti? Lt}-1 AND Fi,iti ! � !..�F^.:" !_(-i;�a L- : NO LARGE RIGHT TUR Pv RADIUS OR SHALLOW RIRHF TU f,i Ai,!L.Lc: Pli " -ii-rT TURN 10 . he2;,-15-+Q. ,. !, ) S iGHT DIST NCE 'P.-ES" T 1 OC-•; ; ( in sec o.-fc4,s AF'PF;t_1ACH A: L_OF'INf!- AVE B. LORING AVE f_'.; CA? 1985 HCM - CH IPTER 1.0 . UNBSIGNALIZED - 3 APPROACHES 'PAGE 2 o-i DATE:06-13-1990 TIME;09:'1 :25 LORING AVENUE AiT CAROL. WAY - 1991,. AM PK - NO BUILD S.EP ?_+ LEFT 1 RNS FROM C:CAROL WAY - CONFLICTING, FLOWS 1.2,c CRITICAL GAPS 6.0 CAPACITY 187 ACTUAL CAFACITY 186 SUMMARY OF LEVEL OF SERVICE BY MOVEMENT MOVEMENT DEMANT) CAPACITY RESERVE LO'_ AVG DELiSEC) t-;VG QUEUE Ll FROM B: ii 734 13 A 4.98 LT FROM C: 5 186 18.1 D 19.9: j• RT FROM C: 14 E'er 599 A 6.01 i>.01. rI�CH PROGRAM VERSION DATE 4-29-1998 �� 1985 H[,M - CHAPTER 10 : UNSIGNALIZED - 3 APPROACHES (PAGE 1 of 2) � ~ DATE:()6-13-1990 TIME:()9:35:35 i LORING AVENUE AT CAROL WAY - 1991 PM PK - NO BUILD �� , LAST DATASETS LOADED OR SAVED � VOLURE= GEOMETRICS= 'IKEY: A- -B ^ | C GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS POPULATION GREATER THAN 250,000; YES CONTRO!��: FROM C: STOP �� FROM C RT LANE: STOP� PREVAILING SPEED: 30 MPH | � MAIN STREET # OF LANES: 2 LANES 0� MAIN STREET APPROACH A - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LANE: N � MINOR STREET LANES APPROACH: C: CAROL WAY ] APPROACH: LEFT AND RIGHT TURN LANE: NO . LARGE RIGHT TURN RADIUS OR SHALLOW RIGHT TURN ANGLE: NO RIGHT TyRN ACCELERATION LANE ON MAJOR: NO SI[�HT DISTANCE RESTRICTIONS ( in seconds) 0� APPROACH A: LORING AVE B: LORING AVE C: CAROL WAY � `~ LEFTE! 0.00 ().00 0.Q-) THRL|S 0 ,00 0.00 ()^00 RIGHTS 0.O0 0.00 S.00 APPROACH A: LORING AVE B: LORING AVE C: CAROL WAY -�� LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT -�� VOLUME 0 468 14 29 505 0 7 S 10 PHF O.90 O"90 0.85 ADS VOLUME 0 520 16 32 561 0 8 0 12 � mm PERCENT GRADE 3.00 3"O0 -2.O0 PERCENT CYCLES 0,00 0.00 0.00 PASSENGER CARS 77.00 97.00 98.00 PERCENT LT TRU 2"00 2.0u 2,00 PERCENT H; TRU 1 "00 1 .()0 0.00 PASS CAR/HR 0 44 7 0 11 STEP 1 RIGHT TURNS FROM C:CAROL WAY -- CONFLICTING FLOWS 528 CRITICAL GAPS 5.�:) � CAPACITY - 697- ACTUAL 93ACTUAL CAPACITY 693 �-- STEP 2 LEFT TURNS FROM B:LORING AVE NP �� CONFLICTING FLOWS 536 � ~~ CRITICAL GAPS 4 , 5 CAPACITY 773 ICAPArITY USED 6% CAPACITY FACTOR 0,97 ACTUAL CAPACITY 793 �� I -- � 19G5 HCM - CHAPTER 10 : UNSTGNALIZED - 3 aPPR[}ACH�S A (PGE 2of 2> DATE:()6-13-1993 TIME:09:35.3�5 LORING AVENUE AT CAROL WAY - 1991 PM PK - NO BUILD STEP 3 LEFT TURNS FROM C:CARpL WAY CONFLICTING FLOWS 1121 CRITICAL GAPS 6.0 � CAPACITY 22G ACTUAL CAPACITY 221 ` SUMMARY OF LEVEL OF SERVICE BY MOVEMENT MOVEMENT DEMAND CAPACITY RESERVE LOS AVE DEL(SEC> AVG 8UEUE wo � LT FROM B: 44 79 749 A 4"8() LT FROM C: 7 221 214 C 16.95 0 21 RT FROM C: 11 693 682 A 5.28 ~- mm � _ � � - � � � CINCH PROGRAM VERSION DATE 4-29-198= 1985 HCM - CHAPTER 10 : UNSIGNALIZED - 3 APPROACHES (PAGE 1 of 2) ATE:08-01-1990 TIME: 19:34:45 LORING AVENUE AT CAROL WAY - 1991 AM PEAK - BUILD CONDITION HAST DATASETS LOADED OR SAVED VOLUME= GEOMETRICS= EY: A- -B C ENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OPULATION GREATER THAN 250.000; YES ONTROLS: FROM C: STOP FROM C RT LANE: STOP EVAILING SPEED: vii MPH AIN STREET # OF LANES: 2 LANES MAIN STREET APPROACH A - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LANE: N 'INOR STREET LANES APPROACH: C: CAROL WAY ARED LEFT AND RIGHT TURN LANE: NO FGHT RGE RIGHT TURN RADIUS OR SHALLOW RIGHT TURN ANGLE: NO TURN ACCELERATION LANE ON MAJOR: NO 'IGHT DISTANCE RESTRICTIONS ( in seconds) APPROACH A: LORING AVE B: LORING AVE C: CAROL WAY FTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 11ARUS 0.00 0.00 0.00 RIGHTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 tPROACH A: LORING AVE B: LORING AVE C: CAROL WAY LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT IMLUME 0 547 9 8 576 0 6 0 33 F 0.90 0.90 0.85 ADJ VOLUME 0 606 10 9 640 0 7 0 39 JrRCENT GRADE 3.00 3.00 -2.00 RCENT CYCLES 0.00 0.00 0.00 ASSENGER CARS 97.00 97.00 98.00 CENT LT TRU 2.00 2.00 2.00 CRS CENT HV TRU LOCI 1 .00 0.00 CAR/HR 0 12 6 0 35 IKEP 1 RIGHT TURNS FROM C:CAROL WAY CONFLICTING FLOWS 613 FITICAL GAPS 5.0 PACITY 630 TUAL CAPACITY 630 tEP 2 LEFT TURNS FROM B:LORING AVE CONFLICTING FLOWS 61B ITICAL GAPS 4. 5 PACITY 730 CAPACITY USED 2% PEDANCE FACTOR 0.99 TUAL CAPACITY 730 85 HCM - CHAPTER 10 : UNSIGNALIZED - 3 APPROACHES (PAGE 2 of 2) TE:08-01-1990 TIME: 19:34:45 RING AVENUE AT CAROL WAY - 1991 AM PEAK - BUILD CONDITION IEP T, LEFT TURNS FROM C:CAROL WAY CONFLICTING FLOWS 1262 CITICAL GAPS 6.0 PACITY 183 TUAL CAPACITY 182 SUMMARY OF LEVEL OF SERVICE BY MOVEMENT MOVEMENT DEMAND CAPACITY RESERVE LOS AVG DEL(SEC) AVG QUEUE tFROM B: 12 730 718 A 5.02 0.02 FROM C: 6 182 176 D 20. 50 0.07 FROM C: 35 630 594 A 6.06 0.01 I 1 1 CINCH PROGRAM VERSION DATE 4-29-1988 F 85 HCM - CHAPTER 10 : UNSIGNALIZED - 3 APPROACHES (PAGE 1 of 2) TE:OB-01-1990 TIME: 19:36:31 RING AVENUE AT CAROL WAY - 1991 PM PEAK - BUILD CONDITION tST DATASETS LOADED OR SAVED VOLUME= GEOMETRICS= tY: A- -B C INERAL CHARACTERISTICS PULATION GREATER THAN 250.000: YES NTROLS: FROM C: STOP FROM C RT LANE: STOP �iEVAILING SPEED: 30 MPH IN STREET # OF LANES: 2 LANES MAIN STREET APPROACH A - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LANE: N OINOR STREET LANES PPROACH: C: CAROL WAY ARED LEFT AND RIGHT TURN LANE: NO RGE RIGHT TURN RADIUS OR SHALLOW RIGHT TURN ANGLE: NO IGHT TURN ACCELERATION LANE ON MAJOR: NO FIGHT DISTANCE RESTRICTIONS (in seconds) APPROACH A: LORING AVE B: LORING AVE C: CAROL WAY FTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 RUS 0.00 0.00 0.00 FIGHTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 tPROACH A: LORING AVE B: LORING AVE C: CAROL WAY LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT UUME 0 471 18 32 508 0 10 0 14 0.90 0.90 0.65 ADJ VOLUME 0 523 20 36 564 0 12 0 16 FRCENT GRADE 3.00 3.00 -2.00 RCENT CYCLES 0.00 0.00 o.00 ASSENGER CARS 97.00 97.00 98.00 CENT LT TRU 2.00 2.00 2.00 RCENT HV TRU 1 .00 1 .00 0.00 RCENT CAR/HR 0 48 11 0 15 ITEP 1 RIGHT TURNS FROM C:CAROL WAY CONFLICTING FLOWS 533 (ITICAL GAPS 5.0 PACITY 688 TUAL CAPACITY 688 IEP 2 LEFT TURNS FROM B:LORING AVE CONFLICTING FLOWS 54v+ ITICAL GAPS 4.5 PACITY 7B7 CAPACITY USED 6% TMPEDANCE FACTOR 0.97 TUAL CAPACITY 787 1 1985 HCM - CHAPTER 10 : UNSIGNALIZED - 3 APPROACHES (PAGE 2 of 2) TE:08-01-1990 TIME: 19:36:3.1 RING AVENUE AT CAROL WAY - 1991 PM PEAL; - BUILD CONDITION EP 3 LEFT TURNS FROM C:CAROL WAY �� NFLICTING FLOWS 1133 ITICAL GAPS 6.0 PACITY 224 TUAL CAPACITY 216 ' SUMMARY OF LEVEL OF SERVICE BY MOVEMENT MOVEMENT DEMAND CAPACITY RESERVE LOS AVG DEL(SEC) AVG QUEUE FFROM B: 48 787 73.9 A 4.87 0.07 LT FROM C: 11 2216 205 C 17.52 0.24 FROM C: 15 688 674 A 5.3,4 0.02 r I , i CINCH P w� 1985 �C� - CHAPTER �0 : ��SlG�ALIZED - 3 4PP��AC�ES (PAGE 1 of 2 > ' DATE:06-�3-19�0 42:06 CARgi �AY AT PAVED WAY - EXISI��G AM PK HR LAST �ATASET3 LOAED OR �� OLUME= GEO�ET�ICS= � | C � N� CENERAL ACTERISTICS � ��FULATION GREAT�R �HAN 25O 000: , � CONTROLS: FROM NR SPEE�: 30 F 11S m� �AlN STREET � OF LANES: 2 LA1 1ES M�IN EL� APPROACH A - EXCLUSIVE �IGHT TURN LAN�� N w� ��N3R STREET LANES APPROACH: C: CAROL WAY SHARED LEFT AND �IGHT T�}RN LANE : YE� N� LAR[�E �IS;T TJRN �A�IUS x,�� S��ALLOW RIG��T �URN A�SLE : �O RIGHT T��RN ACCELERAT�ON LANE �� AJOR: NO � �IJHT DlSTA��CE �ESTRICTI��S ( in secor�s} APPROAC� �: FREEDOM WAY B: FA�ED WAY C: CAROi W4Y N� LEFTS 000 0 �0 000 � °� THR�� 00O 000 0.O� �IG�fTS 000 0 .�O 0.�0 -- AP�ROACH A: FR�ED�M WAY 8: PA�ED �AY �: CA�DL WAY LT TH RT LT T� RT LT Tf� RT �� VOLUME 0 2 1� 19 2 0 4 9 11 � P�F 085 085 083 ADJ ��LUME � 2 15 22 2 O 5 0 13 �E�CENT GRADE -� 00 000 000 N� �E�CENT CYCLES OOO 0.00 �,O0 PASSENGER CARS 780S 9300 98.�O �E�CE�T LT T�i� 2^0O 200 2.00 0� PERCENT HV TR� � ,00 0.0� 0 0O PASS CAR/H�� 0 23 5 O l3 � �� TEP 1 RIGHT TURNS FRgM C :CA��OL WAY CO�FLICTING FLO�3 1O CRITICAL GA�S 5, 5 PAClTY 1O96 ACTyAL [�AP�CITY 1096 "= STEP 2 LEFT TURNS FR[}M B�PAVED �iAY C�NFLICT��G FL�I JS �8 N� C�ITICAL �APS 5O � APACTY 118� CAPACI�Y U�ED 2% IMPEDA�CE FACTC� 0.99 N� ACTUAL CAPACITY 118fj 1985 HC M 0� �ATE:O�-13-197(> TIME:07 :42:06 C4R�L WAY AT ��VED WAY — E�ISTlNG AM PK HR n� 3TEP � LEFT TUR�S FRO� C:CARDL WAY CCNFLICTIN� FLOW� 35 � �RITICAL GAP3 � 5 � �� CAFACITY 918 ACTUAL CAPACITY 91O S�MMARY OF LE�EL OF SERVICE BY M�VE��ENT � M��EMENT DEMA�D [APACITY �ESERVE LOS AVS DEL(�EC) AVG [}i�E�E 118� 1157 A 311 O (}2 ALL MOVES FROM C: 18 10�9 1022 A 3. �� .C2 � == CI�CH PRO�RA , V ��1985 HCM - �HAPTER 1O : UNSIGNALIZED - 3 APPROACHES (PAGE 1 of 2 > � �ATE:(}6-13-1�90 CA�OL W�Y AT PAVED WAY ' /A/ 61 /qqv m.uo»y f64« �p LAST �ATA3�TS LOA3EC O� SA�E� N�VOLUME= GEOMET�ICS= � | C N� GENERAL -HARACTERISTlC� POP�LATIg�� GREAT[R THA� 250,�00: IO CC�TR3LS: �RO� C: ST3� N�PRE�/AIL7@� SPEED: �0 MPH � MAIN STREET # OF LANES: 2 LA�ES Al STREET APPROAC� A - [XCLUS�VE RIGHT TU�N LANE: � m� MINOR STREET LANES AP��OAC:: C: ��AROL �NAY SHARED LEFT ANI) ��G�T TURN LANE: YE3 �� LA�SE RIGHT TUKN �ADI�S �� S�ALLOW RIGHT TURN ANGLE: �O RICHT TUR� ACCELERATION LA�E ON MAJOR : �O ~~ SIGHT D�3TAWC[ �[�T�ICTIONS ( in seconds } AjJP�DACH A: FREEDCM WAY 3: �A;ED WAY C: CARCL WAY N� �EFTS �^ 00 000 � ~= TH��S O.0O 0 �0 OOO RIGHT5 � 00 0.O� 0 �0 A��}ACH A: FREED�M WAY B: PAVED �AY C: CAROL WAY � VrL�mE � 2 16 14 2 O 27 0 12 � m� P�F 0,85 085 � 35 ADJ VOLU�E O 2 19 1� 2 0 32 0 14 � �ERC��T GRADE -20� � 03 O,O0 �� PERCE�T CYCLES 0 �0 0O0 O0O ��3SENG!�R CARS 930� 9B00 93.(}0 FER�E�T LT TR� 2.O0 2'. 2.00 | N� PE�CE�T HV TR� O.00 �A�S CAR/HR O 17 32 0 14 � � m� STEP 1 RIG�T TURNS FR�M C:C4ROL WAY � � CO��FLICTI�� FLOWS 12 � CR�TICAL GAPS � 5 APACITY l094 AC�UAL �AP��CITY 1O�4 °� STEP 2 LEFT TURNS FRO� B:PAVED WAY � CONFLICTING FLOWS 2! � CRlTICAL GAPS 50 �� CAPAC�TY 1175 CHAFTUNSIC�ALIZE� - 3 APPRgACHES (�AG� 2 o� 2 ) � � �� g4TE:0�-13-1990 TIME:O9 : 39:42 ` � � � - CA�OL �AY �T P4Y�D WAY ~~ PTEF 3 LEFT TI FCOM C:�AROL WAY rO�FLI��ING FLOWS 31 N� CR�TICAL GAPS 6 5 �� CAF`ACITY 9�3 ACT�AL CAFACITY 918 SUMMARY OF LE;EL �}F SERVI�E BY MOV��ENT MOVEM��T DEMAi�D CAPACITY RESER;E LOS AVG DEL (SE�} AVG �ijEUE � LT FROM B 17 1�75 1459 A N� ALL �OVE� FROM C: 46 965 919 A 3 92 0 05 � � _ | / CINC� PROGR �� 1985 HCM - CHAPTER % : U149IG04ALIZED - 3 APPROACHES (PAGE l of 2 ) DATE:06-13-1710 TIME:09:43 : 25 CAROL MAY AT PAVED WAY - EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR LAST 0ATASET3 LOADED OR SAVED � N� ;OLUME= GTOMETRICS= � °= KEY : A- -8 | C GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS POPULATION GREATER THAN 250,000: NO � CONTROLS: FROM 0: STOP N� PREVAILIN�� SP[�ED: 30 MPH � MAIN STREET # OF LANES: 2 LANES MAIN STREET APPROACH A - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LANE: N IMINOR STREET LANES APPROACH: C; CAROL WAY SHARED LEFT ANg RIGHT TURN LANE : YES N� LARGE RIGHT TURN RADIUS [}R SHAL�OW RIGHT 11 *00 ANGLE: NO «� RIGHT TURN ACCELERATION LANE 214 MAJDR: NO mwSIGHT DISTPNCE RESTRICTIONS ( in seconds) APPROAC� A: FRE��3� WAY B: FAVED WAY C: CAROL WAY LEFTS 00 0.O0 0 .0j KRUS 00 C . TA Ph TZ� 00 0.0O m� APP�OACH A: FREEDOM WAY Or PAVED NOV C: C4ROL WAY LT TH FT LT TK RT LT TH RT O il) 27 S 16 0.85 0.85 0M5 ADS :OLUPE 0 O 15 5 2 0 32 O 19 PERCE�T GRADE -20S 0 .00 0.00 PERCENT CYCLES 0.0O 0.0C O. 00 � PASSENGER CARS 98 .00 910.00 93,O0 PERCENT IT TRU 2.0;.� 2.0O 2.O0 �� PE�CE�T HV TRU 0` 0.00 0 �0 � PASS CAR/HR 0 5 32 0 19 � JSTEP 1 RIWHT TURNS FRDM C:?AROL WAY � � CONFLICTING FLOWS G CRITICAL GAPS 5. 5 � N� CAPACITY 1079 � m� ACTUAL CAPACITY 100? � =pSTEF 2 LEFT TURNS FRO" G:PAVED WAY CO�FLICFL[>WS 15 � � CRITICAL GAP� 5.� � �� CAFACITY 1182 CAPACITY USED 0� IMPEDA�CE FACTOR 100 ACTUAL CAPACITY 1182 � ' | � � 198� HCM - CHAPTER 10 : UNRIGNALIZED - 3 APPROACHES (PAGE 2 uf 2} �� DATE: O6-13-199O TlNE : O9:43:25 CAROL WAY AT PAVED WAY - EXISTING PM PEAK V�ORT.' STEP 3 LEFT TURNS FROM C:CAROL WAY CONFLICTI�iG FLOWS 1� N� CRITICAL GAPS 6. 5 � -~ CAPAC1TY 942 ACTKAL CAFACITY 941 SUMMARY OF LEVEL OF SERVICE BY MOVEMEAT MOVEMENT LETAND CAPACITY RESERVE LOS AW DFL( SEC) AUG QUEUE ~' LT FROM B: 5 1132 1177 A 3.06 0 .0() N� ALL MOVES FROM Q. 51 774 943 A 3.82 � � ~~ _ ' I CINCH PROGRAM VERSION DATE 4-29-1988 85 HCM - CHAPTER 10 UNSIGNALIZED - 3 APPROACHES (PAGE 1 of 2) TE:08-01-1990 TIME:03:26:41 CAROL WAY AT PAVED WAY - 1991 AM PEAtC HOUR - BUILD CONDITION 1AST DATASETS LOADED OR SAVED VOLUME= GEOMETRICS= EY: A- -B C IENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OPULATION GREATER THAN 250.000: NO NTROLS: FROM C: STOP REVA\SLING SPEED: 30 MPH AIN STREET # OF LANES: 2 LANES .. AIN STREET APPROACH A - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LANE: N IINOR STREET LANES PPROACH: C: CAROL WAY SHARED LEFT AND RIGHT TURN LANE: YES �ARGE RIGHT TURN RADIUS OR SHALLOW RIGHT TURN ANGLE: NO IGHT TURN ACCELERATION LANE ON MAJOR: NO 11IGHT DISTANCE RESTRICTIONS ( in seconds) PPROACH A: FREEDOM WAY B: PAVED WAY C: CAROL WAY LEFTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 ,HRUS 0.o(:) 0.00 0.00 IGHTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 IPPROACH A: FREEDOM WAY B: PAVED WAY C: CAROL WAY LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT #OLUME 0 2 13 21 2 0 4 C+ 13 HF 0.85 0.85 0.85 DJ VOLUME 4) 2 15 25 2 0 5 0 15 PERCENT GRADE -2.00 0.00 0.00 1ERCENT CYCLES 0.00 0.00 0.00 ASSENGER CARS 98.00 96.00 98.00 PERCENT LT TRU 2.00 2.00 2.00 ERCENT HV TRU 0.00 0.00 0.00 ASS CAR/HR 0 25 5 0 15 TEP 1 RIGHT TURNS FROM C:CAROL WAY ONFLICTING FLOWS 10 CRITICAL GAPS 5. 5 APACITY 1096 CTUAL CAPACITY 1096 TEP 2 LEFT TURNS FROM B:PAVED WAY ONFLICTING FLOWS 18 CRITICAL GAPS 5.0 APACITY 1180 APACITY USED 2% IMPEDANCE FACTOR o.99 �CTUAL CAPACITY 1180 1 B5 HCM - CHAPTER 10 UNSIGNALIZED - 3 APPROACHES (PAGE 2 of 2) TE:08-i�1-1990 T IME:0.?:26:41 ROL WAY AT PAVED WAY - 1991 AM PEAL; HOUR - BUILD CONDITION tEP 3 LEFT TURNS FROM C:CAROL WAY CONFLICTING FLOWS 37 ( ITICAL GAPS 6. 5 PACITY 915 CTUAL CAPACITY 907 SUMMARY OF LEVEL OF SERVICE BY MOVEMENT MOVEMENT DEMAND CAPACITY RESERVE LOS AVG DEL(SEC) AVG QUEUE tFROM B: 25 1180 1155 A 3.12 0.02 ,LL MOVES FROM C: 20 1045 1024 A 3. 51 0.02 INCH PROGRAM VERSION DATE 4-29-1988 985 HCM - CHAPTER 10 UNSIGNALIZED - v APPROACHES (PAGE 1 of 2) ATE:08-01-1990 T IME:0?::28:44 CAROL WAY AT PAVED WAY - 1991 PM PEAK HOUR - BUILD CONDITION 1 LAST DATASETS LOADED OR SAVED DLUME= GEOMETRICS= EY: A- -B C ENERAL CHARACTERISTICS 'OPULATION GREATER THAN 250,000: NO CONTROLS: FROM C: STOP ,JREVAILING SPEED: 30 MPH AIN STREET # OF LANES: 2 LANES iIAIN STREET APPROACH A - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LANE: N IINOR STREET LANES PPROACH: C: CAROL WAY SHARED LEFT AND RIGHT TURN LANE: YES lARGE RIGHT TURN RADIUS OR SHALLOW RIGHT TURN ANGLE: NO IGHT TURN ACCELERATION LANE ON MAJOR: NO IGHT DISTANCE RESTRICTIONS ( in seconds) PPROACH A. FREEDOM WAY B: PAVED WAY C: CAROL WAY EFTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 HRUS 0.00 0.00 0.00 IGHTS 0.00 0.00 0.O0 PPROACH A: FREEDOM WAY B: PAVED WAY C: CAROL WAY LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH 'RT #GLUME 0 0 1' 11 2 0 27 0 2 HF 0.85 0.85 0.85 DJ VOLUME 0 0 15 13 2 0 32 0 27 PERCENT GRADE -2.oO 0.0o 0,00 #ERCENT CYCLES 0,00 0.00 0.00 ASSENGER CARS 98.00 98.00 96.00 PERCENT LT TRU 2.00 2.00 2.00 ERCENT HV TRU 0.00 0.00 0.00 ASS CAR/HR o 13 32 i) 27 TEP 1 RIGHT TURNS FROM C:CAROL WAY ONFLICTING FLOWS 8 CRITICAL GAPS 5, 5 APACITY 1099 CTUAL CAPACITY 1099 TEP 2 LEFT TURNS FROM B:PAVED WAY ONFLICTING FLOWS 15' CRITICAL GAPS 5.0 'JAPACITY 1182 APACITY USED 1;: IMPEDANCE FACTOR 1 .00 - CTUAL CAPACITY 1182 1985 HCM - CHAPTER 10 UNSIGNALIZED - 3 APPROACHES (PAGE 2 of 2) TE:08-01-199 TIME:03:28:44 ROL WAY AT PAVED WAY - 1991 PM FEAT: HOUR - BUILD CONDITION EF 3 LEFT TURNS FROM C:CAROL WAY NFLICTING FLOWS 23 CRITICAL GAPS 6. 5 PACITY 932 TUAL CAPACITY 926 SUMMARY OF LEVEL OF SERVICE BY MOVEMENT 0OVEMENT DEMAND CAPACITY RESERVE LOS AVG DEL(SEC) AVG QUEUE It FROM B: 13 1182 1169 A 3.00 0.01 ALL MOVES FROM C: 59 999 940 A 3.8.3 0.06 � r ,�r ;AILING S�r-ED: 3� MPf �� MAIN STREET # OF LANES: 2 LANES MAIH STREET �PPRgA�H A - EXCLUS�VE RIG�T TURN LANE: N �� MINOR STl Ef-T LANES 4PPROAC��: C: ��AVED WAY SHARE� LEFT AND R�GHT TUHN L��NE: YE� �� LAR�� IGHT TL}RN RADI12 L..' RIGHT T�jR� ��GLE: ki� ��GHT T�� ACCELERATION LAN� 3N MAJOR : �O m� S�5��T D��TA�CE RESTR�CTIONS ( in secon�s) APPR�ACH A: LOR�NG �ILL B: LO�ING HILL C: FA;ED WAY LEFTS 0,O0 00� 0.�0 SHTS 0.00 O,OO � .0O -` APPROAC� A: LORING ��ILL G: �ORlNG ;ILL C : PAVE� WAY LT T� RT L� TH R� LT TH �T �� VOLUME O �(> 18 3 9 0 9 C 4 A�J VOLUME �E�CENT GRAD� -2.3� � �0 0.O0 �� PE�CE�T CYCLES 0. O0 O.00 0.0O � PASSENGER C�RS 9GO� 98 ,00 7800 PE�CENT L� �RU 2OO 2.00 2. O0 �� PERCENT �� TRU O0V 000 �.00 �� PA3S CAR/HR 0 4 11 0 5 �� 3TE� 1 RIG!�T Ti}RNS FROM CONFLICTING FLg�S 1� CRITICAL GAPS � 5 1DACITY 1054 �� ACT��L CAFAC�TY 1054 m� STEP 2 LEFr IS F9OM �,:LORING HILL CONFLICTING FLOWS 5� �RITlCAL GAPS 5.0 �� CAFACITY 1135 CA�ACI�Y USED 0� IMPEDANCE FACTOR 1 .0O 0� �CTUAL C�iPACITY 1135 � | / l983 �CM - CHA�TER 1� m� DATE: O6-�3-1990 TIME:09: 49:48 LORING H�LL AND PAVEC WAY �TEP � �EFT TURNS FROM C:PAVE� CONFiICT��G FLOWS 6� �� CRITICAL GAPS 6. 5 � CAPACITY 89� ACTUAL CAPACITY 8�� SU��1A�Y �F L�V�L OF SERVICE BY MOVE�1ENT MDV��ENT DEMAND CAPACITY RESERV� LOS AV�� DEL (SEC� AVG QUE�� ~~ LT FR�M B: 4 �13� 1132 A 318 0.�0 0� ALL ��O;ES FROM C: 1� 933 717 A 3.92 0 �2 � / � -- 04 �iAIN STREET # OF LANES: 2 LA�ES MA�� 3TREET APPROACH A - EXCLUSIVE �IGHT TU�% LANE : N �� MINOR STREET LANES ��PRgA�H: C: PAVE� WAY SHAf-:ED LEFT ANC RIGHT �URN LA�E: YES �� LARGE ��G�T TURN �A�IUS 3R SHAL�O� RIGHT T��N ANGLE: NO � RIG�T TURN ACCELERATION LA�E �� MAJO�: N� `- �I�HT DISTA�C� REST�ICTIONS ( in seccn�s} APPRgAC� A: LORlN� HILL B : LDRING �ILL C: PA�ED �AY LEITS 0.00 0.0� 00O �� THRUS O00 0.00 O0� RlGHT3 0"�� 0 �0 0 .00 -` APPROACH A: LORING H�LL B: L��ING HlLL C� PAVED �AY LT �H �T LT T� RT LT TH RT �� V�LUME 0 15 13 3 1� � 11 0 3 1-4 085 09� 0.85 ADJ VO��E O 19 15 4 19 0 13 0 4 PERCEi�T GRADE -200 000 0.0� | �� RC�NT CY[LES O00 O0O O0V � ~~ P�SSENG�R CARS 98O0 99 �N 78o� PERC�NT �� PERCENT HV TR� 00O 000 000 � �� PASS CAR/�R O 4 13 0 4 � � �� STEP 1 RIG�fT T�RNS FROM C�P4VE� ��Y CONFLICTING FLOWS 2� � CRlTICAL GA�S 5. 5 �� [A�ACITY 107� � | ACTL/�L CAPACITY 1()7J � o� �TEP 2 LEFT RA 4S FRO1 ORINl-� HILL CONFLICTING FLC�3 �� CRITIC�L GAPS 50 �� CAPACITY 1162 CAPACITY I�PEDANCE FACT�P If � 0� ACTUAL CAPAC�TY 1162 �� 1785 �CM - �� ATE:O6-13-l�9O TI�E :O9: 5O: 48 LOR�N�� HILL ANC �AVE� �AY - EYI�TING �ID�AY �EAK STEP 3 LEFT TU�NS F�O� C: PAVED WAY CON�LICTING FLOWS 48 N� CRITICAL [�APS 65 � ~� CA�ACITY 903 ACT�AL C4pACITY 7O2 � � S�MMARY OF LE;EL OF SER;ICE BY M�VENT MOVE��NT DEMANg CAPACI�Y RESER�E iOS AVG DEL ( SEC} AVG Q�}EUE ALL M��ES FROM C: 17 735 718 A 392 0. O2 � � � � � CINCK F�[}GRAM �E�3ION D4TE �-29-19B8 �� 1985 HCM - CHAPTER 10 T �,NSIGNALIZED - 3 APPROACHE� (PAGE 1 of 2 } DA7FE :O6-13-1990 TIME:09: �2:29 L�RING �ILL A�D P�VEDEXISTING FM PEAK LAST DATASETS LOADED OR SA:E� �� VOL��E= GEO�ET�ICS= � | � | C �� GENERAL [HA�ACTERI�TICS POPULA�I3�� SREAT�� CONTROLS: FR[)M C : STOP �� PREVAILING SPEED: 3O MP� � �AIN �TREET � OF LA��S: 2 L4NES STREET APPR��C� A - EXCL�3IVE RlGHT TU��N LANE: N �� MINOR STREET LANES � APPROAC�: C: PAVE� WAY � SHA ...E� LEFT AND RIG�T T�RN L�NE : YEC �� LARGE RI��T T��N RADIUS O� S�ALLOW RIG�T TURN ANGLE: N� �� RIGHT TURN ACCELERATION LA�E ON �AJOR: NO �� SIGHT D�3TANCE RE�TR�CTIONS ( in seconds) APPROACH A: LORING ��ILL 3: LORlN8 HIiL C: ��\�� WAY LEFT� 000 0 �� O,00 �� T�RUS 0OO O.O0 �.00 RIGHT� 0.03 000 0. �� APPROAC� A: LORING HHILL C: PAVED WAY LT TH RT LT T�f RT LT TH RT �� VOL��E 0 14 3 3 19 0 15 0 1 � �� PHF 085 085 0.85 ADJ ��LUME 0 16 4 � 22 0 1� O 1 PE�CENT GRADE -2 .O� � �� PERCENT 0 O0O 0OO PASSENGE�� CACS 9� �0 �8 �0 9300 �ERCENT LT TRU 2.(}0 2.00 2.0O �� PASS CAR/HR O 4 1G O 1 �0STEF 1 RI�F|T Ti��N3 F�OM C :PAVED W4Y C��FLIC�ING FLOWS 18 C��I�ICAL GAPS 5. 5 �� C�PACITY 10G6 ACT;AL C4PACITY 10�6 LEFT TURNS FROM B:LORIN -j �ILL CONFLICTI��G FLOWS 2C CRIT�CAL [�APS 5.O �� CAPAC�TY 1177 CAPACITY �3ED 0% �MPEDANCE FACTOR 100 0� ACTUAL CAPAC��Y 1�77 ~~ 101m: - CHAPTER 13-1990 TIME:09: 52:29 LgRING HILL AND PAVED WAY - EXISTING 7M PEAK STEP 3 LEFT TURNS FROM C:PAVED WAY CONFLICTING FLOWS 44 �� CRITICAL GAPS 6. 5 �� C4PA[ITY VA.- ACTUAL 07ACTUAL CAPACITY 906 SLAMM ,RY OF LEVEL OF SERVICE BY MOVEMENT MOVEMENT DEMAND CAPACITY RESERVE LOS AVG DEL(SEC> AVG QUEUE � � - LT FROM D. 4 1177 1173 A 3 .07 O.00 ALL MRVES FROM C: 19 916 397 A 4 .02 0.02 � ~- � � CINCH PROGRAM VERSION DATE 4-29-1986 985 HCM - CHAPTER 10 : UNSIGNALIZED - C APPROACHES (PAGE 1 of 2) ATE:08-01-1990 TIME:03:32:42 LORING HILL AND PAVED WAY - 1991 AM PEAK - BUILD CONDITION 1AST DATASETS LOADED OR SAVED tOLUME= GEOMETRICS= EY: A- -B C ENERAL CHARACTERISTICS 'OPULATION GREATER THAN 250.000: NO CONTROLS: FROM C: STOP PREVAILING SPEED: 30 MPH AIN STREET # OF LANES: 2 LANES AIN STREET APPROACH A - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LANE: N IINOR STREET LANES PPROACH: C: PAVED WAY SHARED LEFT AND RIGHT TURN LANE: YES ARGE RIGHT TURN RADIUS OR SHALLOW RIGHT TURN ANGLE: NO IGHT TURN ACCELERATION LANE ON MAJOR: NO OIGHT DISTANCE RESTRICTIONS ( in seconds) PPROACH A: LORING HILL B: LOPING HILL C: PAVED WAY LEFTS i>,00 0.00 0.00 lHRUS 0.00 0.00 0.00 IGHTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 #PPROACH A: LOFTING HILL B: LORING HILL C: PAVED WAY LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT GLUME 0 30 18 3 9 U 9 0 4 HF 0.85 0.85 0.85 DJ VOLUME 0 35 21 4 11 0 11 0 5 PERCENT GRADE -2.00 0.00 0,00 1ERCENT CYCLES C).C)O 0.00 0.00 ASSENGER CARS 98.00 98.00 98.00 PERCENT LT TRU 2.00 2.00 2.00 ERCENT HV TRU 0.00 0.00 0.00 ASS CAR/HR 0 4 it 0 5 TEP 1 RIGHT TURNS FROM C:PAVED WAY ONFLICTING FLOWS 46 CRITICAL GAPS 5. 5 �APACITY 1054 CTUAL CAPACITY 1054 TEP 2 LEFT TURNS FROM B:LORING HILL ONFLICTING FLOWS 56' CRITICAL GAPS 5.0 APACITY 1135 APACITY USED 0% IMPEDANCE FACTOR 1 .00 �CTUAL CAPACITY 1135 1985 HCM - CHAPTER 10 : UNSIGNALIZED - 3 APPROACHES (PAGE 2 of 2) ATE:08-01-1990 TIME:03:32:42 RING HILL AND PAVED WAY - 1991 AM PEAK; - BUILD CONDITION TEP 3 LEFT TURNS FROM C:PAVED WAY ONFLICTING FLOWS 60 CRITICAL GAPS 6. 5 ,APACITY 888 CTUAL CAPACITY 887 SUMMARY OF LEVEL OF SERVICE BY MOVEMENT ;OVEMENT DEMAND CAPACITY RESERVE LOS AVG DEL(SEC) AVG QUEUE IT FROM 8: 4 1135 1132 A 3. 18 0.00 ALL MOVES FROM C: 15 933 917 A 3.92 0.02 1 �INCH PROGRAM VERSION DATE 4-29-1988 9B5 HCM - CHAPTER 10 : UNSIGNALIZED - 3 APPROACHES (PAGE 1 of 2) ATE:08-01-1990 TIME:03:34:.37 LORING HILL AND PAVED WAY - 1991 PM PEAK - BUILD CONDITION LAST DATASETS LOADED OR SAVED lOLUME= GEOMETRICS= EY: A- -B C ,ENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OPULATION GREATER THAN 250.000: NO CONTROLS: FROM C: STOP REVAILING SPEED: 30 MPH AIN STREET # OF LANES: 2 LANES AIN STREET APPROACH A - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LANE: N IINOR STREET LANES PPROACH: C: PAVED WAY SHARED LEFT AND RIGHT TURN LANE: YES LARGE RIGHT TURN RADIUS OR SHALLOW RIGHT TURN ANGLE: NO IGHT TURN ACCELERATION LANE ON MAJOR: NO IGHT DISTANCE RESTRICTIONS ( in seconds) PPROACH A: LORING HILL B: LORING HILL C: PAVED WAY LEFTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 _LHRUS 0.00 C).00 0.00 IGHTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 IPPROACH A: LORING HILL E: LORING HILL C: PAVED WAY LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT OOLUME 0 14 3 3 20 0 15 o 1 HF 0.85 0.85 0.85 DJ VOLUME 1) 16 4 4 24 0 18 0 1 PERCENT GRADE -2.00 0.00 0.00 1ERCENT CYCLES 0.00 0.00 0.00 ASSENGER CARS 98.00 98.00 9S.00 PERCENT LT TRU 2.00 2.00 2.00 ERCENT HV TRU 0.00 0.00 0.00 ASS CAR/HR 0 4 is C) 1 EP 1 RIGHT TURNS FROM C:PAVED WAY ONFLICTING FLOWS 18 CRITICAL GAPS 5. 5 APACITY 1086 CTUAL CAPACITY 1066 TEF 2 LEFT TURNS FROM B:LORING HILL ONFLICTING FLOWS 20 tAPACITY ITICAL GAPS 5.0 PACITY 1177 USED 0., IMPEDANCE FACTOR 1 .00 CTUAL CAPACITY 1177 1985 HCM - CHAPTER 10 : UNSIGNALIZED - 3 APPROACHES (PAGE 2 Of 2) LE:08-01-1990 TIME:03:34:37 T RING HILL AND PAVED WAY - 1991 PM PEAK - HUILD CONDITION TEP 3 LEFT TURNS FROM C:PAVED WAY ONFLICTING FLOWS 45 CP TICAL GAPS 6. 5 AC I TY 905 UAL CAPACITY 905 ISUMMARY OF LEVEL OF SERVICE BY MOVEMENT MOVEMENT DEMAND CAPACITY RESERVE LOS AVG DEL(SEC) AVG QUEUE ,T FROM E: 4 1177 1173 A 3.07 0.00 ALL L MOVES FROM C: 19 914 895 A 4.02 0.02 1 ' 1 1 i 1 i 1 CO, 17r,R'Ljlt. MAI� STREET APPROAC; A - ��CL��SIVE RIGHT M�IN STREET APPRDACH B - EXCLU�I�E RIG�T T�RN L4N� : NO -- MI��R S�REET LANES �� APPRCACH: C: �INN�� ST � ~� EXCLUSlVE L�FT TU�N L/�NES� NO EXCL�}SIVE R�SHT Ti!�N LANES: NO LARRADI�S OR LLOW RI��T �� RIGHT T��N �CCELE�ATIO� LANE ON �AJO�: NC A�PROAC;: D: VILLAGE DR �� EXCLUSIVE L[FT TURN LANE�,: M� � EXCLUSIVE �IGHT TUR� LANES: NO LARGE RIGHT TU�� RADI�S OR SHALL�W RIG�� TURN ��GLE: N� R�GHT TURN ACCELERATION LAN� �N MAJ��: ND SIGKT D�STANCE ��ESTRICTIO�S ( 1n secopds) APPRO4C� A: LORI�G NB 8: LORI�G A;E C: VI�NIN CT D : VILLAGE D� �� LEFTS O.(}0 00O � 00 O00 T�RUS O0� O. O0 O.�O O �O R�S;TS � C0 it A�PROACH A: LORING �� B: L�R��G AVE C: VINNIN 3T D: VILLAGE D� LT TH RT LT TH �T LT T; RT LT TH RT UME 8 225 �� 4O 22± 3 3O4 12 i0 3 8 lO ADJ :OLUME 9 25O 44 4 9 12 ��PERCENT GRADE -4O� 0 "�0 S �00 �� PE�CENT CY[LES O. O0 000 OOO 0.0O � FASSENGER CA��S 97O() 97.0() �� PERCENT LT TR� 2.00 2.00 2OO 2 .(>� � ~-PERCE�T H� TRU 10(> 1 .�0 1 .00 O.00 PASS CA�/HR 7 45 345 14 �5 � 1� 12 STEP � �IGHT TUR�S �ROM N�IN �T D:;ILLAGE DR CONFLICTING FLOWS 250 253 � CAPA[ITY 9�4 931 �APACIT� USE� 5% 1% ��PEDA�CE FA�TOR � 97 O.99 ��ACT��L CAPACITY �34 931 ^ � � 1735 HC� - CHA�TER 1O; UNSIGED - 4 APPR[}ACHES / PAGE 2 OF 2) DATF:06-13-1990 TIME: 10:00:32 STFR[}M B:LCF�ING AVE S� A�LOR�NG �B �� CO|1FLICT�NG FLOWS 25� 254 � �� CRITICAL GAPS 4 � 4 5 CAPACITY 1046 1041 CAPAClTY �3ED 4% 1% �� IMP[�DANCE FACTO� O.98 1 ^�0 ACTUAL CAPACITY 1046 1041 "- STEF` � T��RU ��VES F�OM C:VIN�IN ST D:V�LL4GE �R CONFLICTING FLOWS 558 �56 �� CRITICAL GA�S 5, � 5 5 �� CAPACITY 583 584 CAPA��ITY USE� 2% 2% Ii'PED��CE FAC�OR 077 �.99 �� ACTU4L CAPACITY 5bB 5b9 ��STEP 4 LEFT TURNS FROM C: VINNI� ST D:VILLAGE �R � �� CO@FLlCTIN� FL[]W�73 14 CRITICAL 6-4PS CAPACITY 475 472 �� ACTij. 77 444 �� SUMMARY �F LE;FL Jr SERVICE BY M�VEME��T MOVE�ENT jj CAPACITY RE3aRVE L�S AVG DEL ( SEC} A;G QUE�� 45 0 01 �� LT F�OM 8: 45 1()46 1O()C A 36O O^O5 ALL MOVES FROM C: 403 5OB 105 � 34 .44 3.8� | ALL MD�ES FROM D � 25 666 �41 A � 62 O O4 { CINCH PROGRAM �ERSION DATE 4-2�-1��8 0� 1985 HC� - CHAPTER 1O: U�S�G�ALIZED - 4 APPROACMES ( FASE 1 OF 2) �ATE :O�-l3-1990 TTME� 10 : �1 : 27 LO�I�G 4VE @ VI��NIN 3T EXISTlNG MIDDAY FEAK HOUR L4ST DAT4SETS LOADED OR SAVE� ;OLUME=Y GEOMET�ICS=Y � � C GENERAL CHARA[,TE�ISTI�S �OPULATI[}% TER I 250,000: YE� 0� CO��CLS: FROM D: STOP PREVAILING SPEED: 30 �PH MAIN STREET # OF LANES: � MAI� STREET AFPEXCLUSIVE RI3HT TUR� LA��E: YES �Al� STREET 4PF`�OACH G - EXCLUSIVF RIGHT T�RN LA�E: NO �� MINOR STREET LA�ES APPROAC�� C: VINNI� ST �� EX�LijS�VE LEFT TURH EXCLUSI;E R�3��T T�� LANES: NO LARGE RIG;T TURN �ADIyS �R SH4LL�W RIG�T TURN A�CLE : NO �� RlG�T TURN ACCELERATION LA�E ON �AJ�R: NO � APPRO4�!i: EXCLUSIVE LEFT T��N LANE3: ND � �� EXCLUSIVE �IGHT TUR� LANES : NO L�RGE RlGHT TUR� RADI�S gR �HALLOW ��G�T TUR�� ANGLE: NO �7G;� TU�N ACC�LERATIO� LANE gN MAJOR: �D � SIGHT DISTANC[ RESTRICTIONS ( in seconds ) � AP��OACH A: LO�ING NB �: LORINS 3� C: �IN�IN ST D: �ILLAGE DR � �� LEFTS �.00 000 0.O0 0 O0 3 � , 00 OOO O00 O^OO RIS�TS 030 0.00 0 ,�0 f I0� L�f �NG NB 9: LT TH RT LT TH RT LT T. � �� VOLU1E 25 295 154 50 ��0 1O 2(>1 35 4O 1O 25 3O � P;F 0.9� 0 .70 0"9O 085 � � VOLUME 28 317 171 56 �44 11 223 39 44 12 29 35 | � | �� PERCENT GRADE )(} F:. 0. 00 OOS O.00 0.0O � � FASSEN��R �AS 97 ^00 97 ,00 97.O0 78.00 PER[�FNT LT T�U 2.0O 2.O0 2.0O 2.00 �� PERCENT HV TRU 100 � 0� 1 .�O O.0O PAS� CAR/HR 22 57 228 4O 45 12 S�EP 1 RIGHT Ti}RNS FR[]M IF, �R ��O�FLICTING FLgWS 317 350 r2 1 871 840 5% 4� 87� 34� 1985 HCH - CHAPTER l0: �NSIGNAi HES �� DA�E:06-13-l790 TI��E: 10:31 : 27 � �-ORIq,177 �VE @ VI��IN �� EXISTINS �IDDAY �E�K i��R �� STEP 2 LEFT T�RNS F��M B:LORING �C A:L3��NG �� m� CO�FLICTING FLO��S 317 356 C��TICAL GAPJ 4 , � 4 . � CAPACITY 982 9�� CAFAC�T� USED 6% 2% IMPEDANCE FACTOR O97 0.99 ACTUAL CAPAClTY 982 9�6 STEP 3 TMRU MOVEH FROM C:VINNIN 5T D:VILLAGE i}� � C��FLICTING FLgNS 75� 750 N� C�ITlCAL GA�S 5. 5 5. 5 � �APAC�TY 451 �58 CAPACITY ;SED 9% 6% �� IMPEDANCE FACT[�R 0.95 09b �� CTUAL CAPACITY 435 438 m� STEP 4 LEFT TURNSC:VI�NlI ST D:V1LLAG�� R �O�FLICTING FLg�S 82O 833 ��IT�CAL GAPS 60 6.0 �� CAFACITY �55 3�G ACTUAL CAFACITY 321 398 - SUMMARY CF LE;EL OF SE�VICE BY MOtT MOVEMENT JEMAND CAPAC��Y RE�ERV� LO� AVG DEL(SEC) AVG HD if. �� L� FROM A: 22 946 924 A 3.90 0.02 LT 1:7RDM G : 57 98 006 ALL MOVES F�OM D: 77 519 442 A 81� O, 17 � mm � � C � .01 GEN�RAL CHA�A�T�RIST!C�� POPULATION GREATER TUAN 25O,0O�� YES C�NTR�LS: FROM C: �TOP N� FR[}M D: STOP FREYAILINPEED: 3O MPH MAIN STREET # OF LA�ES: 2 LANES �� MAlN �T�EET APFROACH A - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LANE : YELS � MAIN S��E� APPR�]ACH 3 - EXCL�3��E RIGHT TURN N F. LAf E5 APPRJAC�: C: �INNIN ST � EXCLUSIVE LEFT TU�N LANES: ND �� XCLi�S�VE RIGHT TUR�� LA��S: NO LARGE RIGHT TUR� �AC��S �R SHAL�OW ��G�T T�� ANGLE : NO RI�;T T�� ACCELERATI�� LA�E [}N �AJOR: NO -- APP�OA��: �: yILLAGE DR EXCLUS�;E L�FT TURN L4mES: �O �� EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURP L4�ES� NO � =� LARGE RIG�� TURN RADIUS OR ��ALLOW RI�!!T ��R� A��SLE: NO | RIGHT TURN ACCELERATIO� LA�E ON �A�OR: NO | | Z-1IUHSTANCE RESTRICTIONS ( in secon�s> | -- APPROA[� A: LORING NB B: LOR�NG SB C: ;IN�IN ST D: VILLAGE �R LEFTS 000 0.0� 0.00 000 0� T�R�S O0� O.00 O00 00� � �IGHTS 00� 0.00 �.�0 000 �� APPROACH A: LO�I�� NG 8: LORIIG SB C: VINNIN 3T D: VI| LAGE C� � LT TH RT LT TH 9T LT �; RT LT TH RT VCL�MI- 25 294 179 40 32O 10 119 35 4O l� 25 35 �� PHF 0"90 090 09� 0,85 � � �DJ Vf fLUME 29 327 199 44 356 11 131 37 44 12 29 41 �ERCENT GRADE -� ,0� 0.0� 0.00 �� PERCENT CYCLES �.�(} 0,00 O00 000 �� P�S3E�GER CAR� 7700 97.()0 97 .0� 98.0� PERCFT LT T�U 2.!)0 2.00 2. O0 2.00 FERCENT HV TR; 1 ,00 1 .00 1 .00 O �O PSS CAfj �� STEF l RIGHT TyRNS FROM C:;�N�IN ST D:VILLAGE �R � CONFL�CTIN� FLOWS 327 361 �� CAPACITY 86� 831 �� CAPACITY ijSED �% 5% IMF�DANCE �ACTO� O97 O77 ACTUAL CAPACITY 861 G31 | ` 1985 �CM - CHAPTE D4�E:06-13-199� TIM�: 1O:34:07 �� LORING/VI��IN EXISTING E�ENING PEAK ��UR � STEP 2 LEFT TURNJ FROM B:LORING SB A�LO�ING NB CONFLIC�I�j L�WS 327 367 �� CRITICAL �APS 4 . � �. � CAPACITY 973 9�± CAPACITY 153E� � �� IMPEDANCE FACT�R 0.�8 O.99 ACTUAL [�APACITY 973 93� � STEP 3 THRU MES FR ININ ST D;;ILLAGE D� CCNFLICTI�G FLOWS CRITI�AL GAPS �� CAF`ACITY 448 4�2 CAPACITY USED 9% 7% I�FEDA�t"CE FACTgR 0 ,95 O.76 LIF TUAL CAPACITY � LEFT T�RNS !77 � :VlN�I� ST D:VILLAGE D� � LICTlN336 843 | CRITICAL GAPS 6 � 6.O | CAF��CITY 0� AC1 kjA� CAPACITY � �� 3��ARY OF LEVEL �F SERVICE BY UO�EM�NT EMENCITY PE3ERVE LOS A�G DEL (�EC > A;G QUEUrr �� LT FR�� B : 45 973 727 A 388 0.05 ALL �OVES ��O-1 C: 219 38� 1±5 D 21 .34 1 .33 ALL MO��S �ROM C� 8� 529 4 46 4 807 �, 19 � - �m �� 178� HCM - C;AFTER 10: UN3IGNALIZ�D - 4 APPROACHES (�AGE l OF 2} 0� DATE:06-1�-l99O TI�E: 1O: 37:O7 � LO��NG AVE @ ;IN�I� ST 19�1 NO BUIL� MORNING �� LAST DATA�ETS LOADED �R SAVED V�L�ME=Y GE�METRICS=Y KEY: D 4- -g | GE�ERA1 TERISTI[S POPULATI[}N GREATE� THAN 2sO,O00� YE� CONTROLS: FR!OM C: STOP �� FROM D; ST0P PREVAILI�G SPEED: 3O MPH �AIN STREET # !Jr LAN�S: 2 LANE� � IN STREET - F"f A - EXCLi��IVE �IGHT TURIN LANE: YES � MA�N EET APPR[}ACH n - �XCLUSIVE RIG��T TU�N �� MINOR STREET LANES � � ArPROACH: C: ;I�NI� S7 � ��CLUSI�E L�F� TURN LA�ES: NO @C LARGE RIGHT T�R� RADI�S 3� SHALLOW RIG! NO RISHT if :CFLER�TION � ... �R � EXCLU��E LEFT T�RN LA��ES : NO RIGHit LANES: NO | iAR8E RIG��T T�� RADI�S O�� SGALLOW RI�HT �i�� ANGLE : NO � RPRN ACCELERATION LANE ON �AJOR: NO �� SIGHT DISTA�CE �ESTRICT�ONS ( in ncls} APP��ACK A: LORING NB B: LORING SB t: ;ILLAGE DR LEFTSS00 O.00 000 0� THRUS 0.00 0.00 000 O.O0 � �IGHT�� 000 000 O.�0 0.00 �� APPROACH A: LORI��O �C G: LORING SB C: VINNIN ST �: VILLA�E DR LT T; RT LT TH �T LT TH ��T LT TH RT � ;DLUME 3 23O 337 41 231 3 31O 12 41 3 8 10 kj^90 O.85 � m� ADJ VOLUM� 9 256 �74 46 257 3 344 13 �6 4 9 12 FE400 0.VO 0.(}0 0� PRCENT CYC�EC 0.00 0 NGER CA97,O0 97 .00 98.0() | PERCENT LT TR� 2.00 2.00 2.O0 2.�O PERCENT ��V TRU 1 .00 1 .O0 1 .O0 0.03 �� PASS CAr /�R 7 4� 351 l4 46 4 10 12 0� �TEP 1 �IG��T I tq C:V 4I�� ST D: ��LLAGE DR � I-LIN FLOWS 2�� 258 CPITICAL GAP� 5.0 �.� �� CAPACIT� 728 925 IriPEDAN�E FACTOR 0.97 0. 79 ACTUAL CAPACITY 928 �25 � ij �w STEF T I�i' MOVES FROM C:VIN�IN ST D:VlLLAIGE DR C�NFLICTINS FLOWS 570 568 CRITICAL �� CAPA[��TY �74 575 CA�ACITY USED 2% 2% I��EDANCE �ACTO� 099 099 ACTUAL CAPACITY 559 560 � �� STEP 4 L�FT TURNS FR[}M �:V��NIN S� D:VILLAGE �R � ~� CONFLI��I�G FL�WS 591 627 �RIT��AL GAPS 6.0 6.0 CA�ACITY 487 464 �� A�TUAL CA�ACITY 469 43� LEVEL �F SERVlCE BY MOVEMENT � MOVEMENT ��MAND CA�ACITY RE3ERVE L[}3 A�G DEL(SEC } AVG QUE��E �� LT FRO� A: 7 1(}3� 1O29 A �. 50 0 01 m� LT FROM �: 46 1O40 994 A 3 .�2 0.05 ALL M[}VES FROM C: 411 500 88 E 4O79 4 .66 ALL ��VES FROM D: 2� 6�7 632 A 570 � 04 � � � NOR STRE�T LA��S | [XCLUSI�E LEFT TUR� LANES: NO � �� CLUSI�[ RIGHT TURN LANES: NO � LAR8E RIGHT T�� RADI�S �R SHALLO� RI6HT T�� ANGLE : �O � RIGHT TijR�� ACCELE�ATIgN LA�� DN MAJORv N� APPR�}AC�: D: ;ILLAGE DR � EXCLUSIYE LEFT Ti�RN LANES : NO � EXCL��I;E RIGHT TURN LANES: Ntj �� LARGE RIGHT Ti�RN R4DIUS OR SHALLO� RIGHT Ti�R� A�GLE : NO RIGPT �URN ACCELERATION LA�E �N MAJ�H: ��[} �� GHT DIST/��CE RESTRICTIONS ( in seconds ) �PPROACH A: LORING NB B: LORI%G SB C: ;INNI� 3T D: �ILLAGE DR LEFTS (�.00 0.00 O00 O.00 0� THRU� 0.0O O.00 0 ()O O00 PROAC� LORING SB C: VI��NIN ST D: VILLAGE DR LT TH �T LT T�f RT LT TH �� LT TX RT | VOL�ME 25 3O5 182 41 327 1O �18 35 4O 1(} 25 3� 0 0 '90 � 85 ' A�J VOLUME 28 337 2O2 46 6 11 131. 37 4� 12 29 41 PERCENT GRADE -1 .3� | PERCENT CYCLES 0.00 O.00 0.0O 0.0O � | ~� PASSENSER CAR�� 97 .00 ?7.0O �7.00 98 �0 | LT ^ | � PERCENT T�U 2.00 2^O0 2^0O I HV T�U 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 �.00 �� PASS HF: 22 46� 134 �O �5 12 30 42 � 0� STELI- t LLAGE DR � CON�LlCT�NG FLO�S 339 371 CRITICAL �AP� 5 .() 5O N� CAPACITY 350 822 � m� CAPACITY U3ED I�PEDA�CE F4[TOH �.�7 0.97 ACT�AL ��ACITY �� 822 | � / 1�:T E: P, I F Rt-A �j .1 LAI f�.o- 1 i-TU F. F RCIM f I i 41 q 7)- L G E DR I'M I- PA L! W DAPAC.1-1 Y U-Z F.,F) I'%;-- C%--P,lc I T _2 4 .......... m'El F. P t v M .. ....... .... J- ji 1 L 1985 HCM - CHAPTER 10: UNSIGNALIZED - 4 APPROACHES (PAGE 1 OF 2) ATE:08-01-1990 TIME:03: 16:38 ORING AVE C VINNIN ST 1991 BUILD MORNING PEAP HOUR LAST DATASETS LOADED OR SAVED GLUME= GEOMETRICS= i"EY: D A- -B C �ENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OPULATION GREATER THAN 250.000: YES CONTROLS: FROM C: STOP FROM D: STOP IREVAILING SPEED: 30 MPH MAIN STREET # OF LANES: 2 LANES FAIN STREET APPROACH A - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LANE: YES IN STREET APPROACH B - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LANE: NO MINOR STREET LANES IPPROACH: C: VINNIN ST EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN LANES: NO fXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LANES: NO ARGE RIGHT TURN RADIUS OR SHALLOW RIGHT TURN ANGLE: NO IGHT TURN ACCELERATION LANE ON MAJOR: NO PPROACH: D: VILLAGE DR XCLUSIVE LEFT TURN LANES: NO EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LANES: NO TARGE RIGHT TURN RADIUS OR SHALLOW RIGHT TURN ANGLE: NO IGHT TURN ACCELERATION LANE ON MAJOR: NO IGHT DISTANCE RESTRICTIONS ( in seconds) PPROACH A: LORING NB B: LORING SB C: VINNIN ST D: VILLAGE DR EFTS o.OC; 0.00 0.00 0.00 THRUS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 �IGHTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 �PPROACH A: LORING NB B: LORING SB C: VINNIN ST D: VILLAGE DR LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT VOLUME 8 234 338 44 235 .3 7111 12 48 3 8 10 IHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.85 DJ VOLUME 9 260 376 49 261 3 .346 13 53 4 9 12 ERCENT GRADE -4.00 0.00 0.00 PERCENT CYCLES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 IASSENGER CARS 97.00 97.00 97.00 98.00 ERCENT LT TRU 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 PERCENT HV TRU 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 0.00 'ASS CAR/HR 7 50 352 14 54 4 10 12 TEP 1 RIGHT TURNS FROM C:VINNIN ST D:VILLAGE DR ONFLICTING FLOWS 260 263 RITICAL GAPS 5.0 5.0 CAPACITY 924 921 IAPACITY USED 6% 1% MPEDANCE FACTOR 0.97 0.99 ACTUAL CAPACITY 924 921 1 1985 HCM - CHAPTER 10: UNSIGNALIZED - 4 APPROACHES (PAGE 2 OF 2) ATE:08-01-1990 TIME:03: 16:38 ORING AVE @ VINNIN ST 1991 BUILD MORNING PEA[-..'.' HOUR STEP 2 LEFT TURNS FROM B:LORING SB A:LORING NB ONFLICTING FLOWS 260 264 kITICAL GAPS 4.5 4.5 CAPACITY 1036 1032 IAPACITY USED 5% 1% MPEDANCE FACTOR 0.97 1 .00 ACTUAL CAPACITY 1036 1032 ITEP 3 THRU MOVES FROM C:VINNIN ST D:VILLAGE DR CONFLICTING FLOWS 582 581 tkITICAL GAPS 5, 5 5,5 FACITY 565 566 CAPACITY USED 2% 2% iCPEDANCE FACTOR 0.99 0,99 TUAL CAPACITY 550 551 LEP 4 LEFT TURNS FROM C:VINNIN ST D:VILLAGE DR ONFLICTING FLOWS 603 647 CRITICAL GAPS 6.0 6.0 tPACITY 479 452 TUAL CAPACITY 460 42o SUMMARY OF LEVEL OF SERVICE BY MOVEMENT OVEMENT DEMAND CAPACITY RESERVE LOS AVG DEL(SEC) AVG QUEUE FROM A: 7 1032 1024 A 3. 51 0.01 FROM B: 50 1036 986 A 3.65 0,05 tMOVES FROM C: 420 495 75 E 48.28 5.64 ALL MOVES FROM D: 25 646 621 A 5.80 0.04 CINCH PROGRAM VERSION DATE 4-29-1988 985 HCM - CHAPTER 10: UNSIGNALIZED - 4 APPROACHES (PAGE 1 OF 2) ATE:08-01-1990 TIME:03:20: 17 LORING AVE C VINNIN ST 1991 BUILD EVENING PEAK HOUR LAST DATASETS LOADED OR SAVED VOLUME= GEOMETRICS= ,EY: D A- -B C IENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OPULATION GREATER THAN 250.000: YES iONTROLS: FROM C: STOP FROM D; STOP PREVAILING SPEED: 30 MPH ,AIN STREET # OF LANES: 2 LANES AIN STREET APPROACH A - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LANE: YES MAIN STREET APPROACH B - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LANE: NO ,INOR STREET LANES APPROACH: C: VINNIN ST XCLUSIVE LEFT TURN LANES: NO XCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LANES: NO LARGE RIGHT TURN RADIUS OR SHALLOW RIGHT TURN ANGLE: NO �IGHT TURN ACCELERATION LANE ON MAJOR: NO APPROACH: D: VILLAGE DR CXCGE LUSIVE LEFT TURN LANES: NO LUSIVE RIGHT TURN LANES: NO RIGHT TURN RADIUS OR SHALLOW RIGHT TURN ANGLE: NO RIGHT TURN ACCELERATION LANE ON MAJOR: NO LIGHT DISTANCE RESTRICTIONS ( in seconds) APPROACH A: LORING NB B: LORING SB C: VINNIN ST D: VILLAGE DR fHFTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 RUS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 GHTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 OPROACH A: LORING NB B; LORING SB C: VINNIN ST D: VILLAGE DR LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT UUME 25 308 185 45 333 10 121 35 43 10 25 35 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.85 ADO VOLUME 28 342 206 50 370 11 134 39 48 12 29 41 FRCENT GRADE -4.00 0.00 0.00 RCENT CYCLES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ASSENGER CARS 97.00 97.00 97.00 98.00 PERCENT LT TRU 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 RCENT HV TRU 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 0.00 SS CAR/HR 22 51 137 40 49 12 30 42 ,TEP 1 RIGHT TURNS FROM C:VINNIN ST D:VILLAGE DR CONFLICTING FLOWS 342 376 0AITICAL GAPS 5.0 5.0 PACITY 847 818 PACITY USED 6% 5% IMPEDANCE FACTOR 0.97 0.97 tTUAL CAPACITY 847 818 1985 HCM - CHAPTER 10: UNSIGNALIZED - 4 APPROACHES (PAGE 2 OF 2) �ATE:08-01-1990 TIMF_:03:20: 17 ORING AVE G VINNIN ST 1991 BUILD EVENING PEAK HOUR STEP 2 LEFT TURNS FROM B:LORING SB A:LORING NB ,❑NFLICTING FLOWS 342 381 RITICAL GAPS 4,5 4. 5 CAPACITY 959 923 IAPACITY USED 5% 2% MPEDANCE FACTOR 0.97 0.99 CTUAL CAPACITY 959 923 ITEP 3 THRU MOVES FROM C:VINNIN ST D:VILLAGE DR CONFLICTING FLOWS 801 796 RITICAL GAPS 5, 5 5, 5 APACITY 428 431 APACITY USED 9% 7% iMPEDANCE FACTOR 0.94 0.96 CTUAL CAPACITY 411 414 'TEP 4 LEFT TURNS FROM C:VINNIN ST D:VILLAGE DR ONFLICTING FLOWS 672 882 CRITICAL GAPS 6.0 6.0 APACITY 330 325 CTUAL CAPACITY 296 285 SUMMARY OF LEVEL OF SERVICE BY MOVEMENT IOVEMENT DEMAND CAPACITY RESERVE LOS AVG DEL(SEC) AVG QUEUE ,T FROM A: 22 923 901 A 4.00 0.02 T FROM B: 51 959 908 A 3.97 0.06 ILL MOVES FROM C: 226 366 140 D 25.70 1 .61 LL MOVES FROM D: 83 5u7 423 A 8. 50 0.20 i # 7 Noway Maples g ' 3 ! !Joy .,l o vd �a /►�nf -•�l"f>� rL/IK�n/ar+2�rCh�l�v aPP� `� ,2,,ca 5'-fV 5 bgoe1al, _ Cp1ora ,4v Spf LIGe /U t1a vQS'►e �i►G SpI Z- Bur ritri 3o" y 1 ,� �iu , o pez►r# Pjtr �h Z'ZYt C..�i. , 13 Kazan Ru lea Cr,rr,cr fa,Zcite.� 1� -18 r 1 U el�3ware.VI\►e-- Awa tP� tat a �I. 19 Haft leu Yew 3 '4 D�n SN a 2 La Z Koslum Z Z �a -2-1 '�I '' 2 3 I�Io�ra Zit n61=i KI ►�>do �'30; �✓ 26 rA ' 7 Compact 1`41'rze4-_Jun�Pe r ll i �� 1 Mays lo �✓�c" Vl �n�rnl��, # 21} �� Z�f D�1-k Alnor►can Arborvlrae `f'--`} Py carn -A4 Ali 17ai'GI I sl #•S i3# wrl Icst. � :� � �Ic t` �.,�va.r-Tt-,+-� c S 5�"�u►r't - �- j � I v� v n#� LAS-- not lSGnot +tP x i jdlt {c�a1�Y,�• � k'�fTnv� P-X,iSt• �i��.x-►ti u- �s:l-ic..s-Gt'e wry �� -c \ , .tet �x�5 t 4 wide, ,P\a��-e..� 5�,-►p \ Ferrlove Arid 5+ZO-r ,Ic all 4cX c-O-u s� Z.' rX.. vJitl jUfo f44 i n t Z 2"43"*400, osit �3L92 t 'I"; 1 �em�v till and k"j 1b .411 xt alant ai cr-iJeptK T - orr n c6dn -O f � aF RQrn��c all 10& � psve-T•ne.k-t" whip n b I( , tfi � rirr>ct� c the nevV ro' pkAn+inaj Prc 1i' I irlsfa111� csnd =�rtr4Gct�d 2" (.�y+�-• 4 341�a•�1� r�xrst IJ.1"1�••F I 'oQ ` jx�or tri m�va; �n��#�n,* '•-. st-�-,�; ! S�alpe� ern +._ curb TO I1 , •P k IJ O GUrYJ S�� b'c�5 Z li j �t�1 Wltft �,� COr1G. r �X (4w ,# �C 6 o -7 o� P tl 0 n'4, I ZIt'14 1��f*�lr =fit III+rI ' ll�nlll`�11,_ t 30 # L I d a I I I N'ff x.� utak -5 are. s n � trOt"IV U G3. S�a1C�S�pull r # t�-1 1' \ 1 kac 5 t ,�� na acls o 2 - - . 1 �(!st the Z , [' ® � I V3IeM nZAI be �7,eu C1 S i 23 t'1 4 V I # L t i v � N � =1 ZO_ a , ra �A 7 `. s 'A V" � , .-- �fsn•t 3d¢ a� ar,�rl�fij 6_p `� ..,� t ;w�c�onS. Ga '�► �V� 3;.? urn „ �a�-�N. �� vt IMULK e I j 21� �/ 1 LXI �� f � ��• ti"r �( 06 d o a r�--gyp 51r f .r�i j ra"N+�= curb 14 IV lz� / ~/J.•t ��ll, /�/�� ` _ I t rl t 1flq SO1� i �,'l.,_ Ire _� ►� - I#I -_ J+-= t1+1 G"G�ml:,a�#� �ar,+i�.' I k$►rl Y-47 UnstakacA 11-1:�`hr-L-Ib r � l o r-! -7 �-�� ; A V E- :�-�'!/sJ,Er�•.s off- Lo,.�� /r`LS/4 ssoc,a J--�s /'-��sT `. � � —' �S7• % E --------------- ,mac iJA e/O/ Od LOY 16 �e1 ,, ? 5� $ • � � oil{�j5f �y � � \\ p3 o 'f¢J55p vie l"Ior- scc �` \ O s LE r \, �, � � `fin r` ,�♦. � . . Yf e, ;''� � �• 14 4 10 r t UP*011, 14, fall . � t� � � lR��,� �. , i �• � ''_"�`° _ .. — zo •,; � � L ALL/ lo o l p R I r' :r .'1' � - \ ^. O � ��1 .1} ��' ..• - _ :.. i3O. .� �/ .�/E�,(cr4� /�'� WA i -- -'v--Wc3'gffx _. ter. d / 144', s GO�I C. �1i�B�4 L-- �•• \ /Z" c. , , � •"• `��•' �0•.✓.oa � bras ��'�. /C"Co�/c �.,�.� '• •� - - /' O -47 Mao Aw tj � � - ,,.. .gib.on � /��.¢�•G� a--j� �•-.-..�� .5'4t 2 059"0.5.� � 0 .r...,.,,., � � r� •��'_ � �. ,` .� � /00.04 SC�46D/V/ /0 su6o,vs o,u: L 0.e IA14F Aa �I L 1. ASW1 � � � � v uTQEET �t/r4rc./ES•• - — _ _ _.. _-�. _ l � •5C.8 Loie�i✓S ,t✓F.S�LtN,tif�ss. 47 ��Qa L YST•e v�cE, �. Od 7"=: MOV • S, G Si�rl/aTuic'.E.• �_ ['%� '�- •'f2. ....__._ dpk� �S'T-o C- OW e .ovE ,��. �o .� r 2� ,�c -..._ BE,vc�r .cia,er�s 4•S40 /.Vf/. Zds .64- ,� ---z-- T /.�TF�SECTio.v /C..aw__ is c�. ,,,,<,,;l ,,r---T�-- ,� J'o E,rr<s,�' /G" .M.1li.r - LoeiA✓� A v� c/i v vi�t/ ST.. Ey, = 4 .yo _ .. _® � seL��v pL.di✓rvivG ,eon 1z,o ,4OP4 &,47-l' o�/f,L�o: ----- --- - -/ jNW a !{/t �ya a ___. f PL.a•tn/ C -V A . I .►+ �� i -•ray ;!M)j .r fi.', i ✓ L;°,' c. =�(' c Cas f'��.e i�� r°T _ — _.-- M ;ir:dCt)ti :i t MANCCIK Akio.- p Nk .n S\ - v ,> r I� t i j �, General Notes : 1. The water distributior� layout on th,s pia is +o I 1$, Where ovQrbl-+rden ,tS ancour�t.er<:j rn ansae own I` I I _ Dr I SewP_r Sch -dU !E O nsidered scherr�rt�cc7r� ma be alter�w,th the markeU Lin driller - 3' �7i��res5 eT ��//AcrV �airtlirf. ,i=e /r,'=�d��='� '9 � �e 0. en ,veers approve1, -d ( 8 the f�r,�h, tscf ri /'f use stcna, l� � ',rh�Cr /cz l- �L + o G�5 Y a Gl Yk Girl L /, `rrrcr' ns'r- menu- C ' lGt7� sA:t ort Rlrn Inv. In Inv.Out From To Length Slopes Nota 4 H. e�'r-illir7y ,n treat irnr) GG/- ac+ter rs S CG S. ( �asa� o� / o�r- r7k9y ,��'t�'/ F Y,D. 1 54,7 51.7 Y,D,2 52' o.00ro O M 2.Gr,9nite Lurb �1 all be Installer a Lcrinq NiIIs L\venue , f rt�j�,- f,,Z,' the- TF to alr,Cl- s?e- ccrzStri�ct/ori * wl+h a 5'cone, slde�Ik G Sror�1I(vesll!-,. (S�� s�Gt'S, ,q#- B)or,.,?, an/r? gP-7Aj, ver,�s IZ' min Y.O. 2 54.7 51.4 51.3 Y.0. 1 Y.0,3 35' 0.006 +- _rq 4 * � 'V) 3. PI+c_1-i Chan es on the t� -4 etre wa I I< 5 hci 11 b� be- Rc a r� 4o c_,rr i rua{ z1J. Vr M 41- N h 9 1 tri, �// htzs�n�.) byy� cntl curvp-J --lo �e-s Lh,3ru } { r SCIr� r-� —�I IS N1c��1 fir`/sem �`�' F Y.O. 5 5�F.7 51.t 51.0 Y.D2 Y.O•`} 82' noon � + +- no rror- Adan I" pt:r 3� y I ��h;rl, . �CZ•71C z�•� SUr- c�Ce Y a5 dirctefet b iY Ifc�1 +tet �OrrJ,t/G/1 y N O 4. Wheelchair ramps -shall tieirmtallcd at alldriveway l YD. 4 54.7 So.S 5o,�i Y,D,3 CB t 3s' :•X13 10 ent�an�e y/'�t!l 5,dev✓alk5 (seQd�ta•tl l3A) �� r-� s >�`- o �o� c�nom/ 5/c%g -!'r_ r�/7j J,-_r Ser/ rp t. 1t, _. 4fj- T-Z.\ d o , f/ <_"!rr/ � -� stcr7�s-4-t P�-S, 'fo � es siall r� vTilde x 1-t'c�ee ' S. All Nar king s r' r �tcnC ,vsll \ \ EZack I X11 rna�c<►�IL' Thi i5 ��c f7U1-1. t�andl�a �at �t� shall k� z w c� G �q'd�� con,�trvctlor�, / _ a�hi tC�lS �=�f ' V) I i P 5 Y P' l SeGGS, -mac+ll C.a. i �2� 4�•a 4a YD �+ c e 2 low' 0.042 ul I „ t= L f M I (o. Sec oheet 5-1 f0r,Pourci. iorl3ir -„un5, 3 All la outdirnen5, ns �crda i�e� ys # •v Ikg VrlrJ,s+ur}�� soil orl -5/•'=ct �- 1 C,B. 2 4a.o s' _ Q [ 5,3 C,B.L,SD [�,�►-�2 3I' o.00d Firi F/, nn — — � i I r `Q, I are o the fierce o th_curb. 0-fov�at,ocl IZ'Gover- o�=�} , o L e- +, — � :V; N I+ I' I %. /SII 5i sh'all ,n�-ren to Gity oP `Soiem -f>-a��,c Ii�t. GrvchCcl st-�ri c M_-TI,4r le�.,a ��ce �G�` Exist QMH i 47.6 43 r C6 z a� ��V• SP�U�IC TIOri�. Cv�r wts(71-oIL '1 Q I A D. '+$.(o -4?,4 C.B. 2 4C�' O.CSt; Uwe- dank ainS r.Ittr= r� / _ It n� Pro . Mrd /-.,\ E � i c` _ I 8, Exist, -1r1 un-r rou ip re alCrr / — — Fl7c�/7, / �q C� l� c� r� p i Y.D, 6 54.0 .51,0 Y.u.7 Se' 0.009 it'!Gh VOIT00e e-1 t-riG t'I e.r,�k-tcle, 4 T) m Q Ga� le T,�/r -•l-rX.s-t'Ivri St1r \v ll 1S aPj:roXtf,iai"e• a./,�la 1ev I {, `I 1 G -4 /2 -tG✓PJ'ar1«• I�,c t�r w.AII T- �o Y 0, 7 53.'S 50.5 5p.!{ Y.D,b C,B.4 5 5' 0.01 -� -' () Fnd'n. \ 9. Lin�dri//,,- l ye axe shall fav / I — Foo tlr7 \ a� �_ / 0 tO,Gae- +ecF, �11ter ,abr "r -�P✓e� fie rnthe pldris 2 V,�QJ�hc12C�o OG- Le m �ac�, ' c.B.3 53.► µ9.l c.a4 se' 000i Exist, ,3r-d. �i t�rlml8.7-Ya, \ I `�_ k�e j l ctt-7 le n� +r a, � and til C.B.CB 4 53 8 48.7 ,3 48.6 Y D 7,C,g3 DMH 5 8 0.02 '- — Ex/st, rd.�_ / k FO(�tlnq Prof, yrd. shall , — I�/ ��I,,�c _,Cj v5e as a Ilt� Ib //. g - 01 cb1e pr-vent„a� ttr Fs�e 5a rd S` D,M}i, 52.5 y�9 C's,y �,3 '' I �rt3ER 3Y CAIRTr{AGE� Mi 3401 13y aR EQUAL ter' Po(-y - ' S4 S e,c f i o n A h .vn / 2n tiro , 11 ''/ ,,tt __ �a le- I�14� 1 1 � C,13 5 5112 47.1 C.B.6 I G' 0.006 Prop. g' PVC. a /� �Z �G/ S r/„/�/Gr �/ef- vx/Gi- s = from BId' Inv.2 tl. .� 1 /f-i� �� (6"�-�,6�) - ' ►3 y 151, i 8 P V.C_sewer /,a v c�lc//r a��y—, wc /is. SF' / F'VC s=0.007 O I Prop ,3PV,C. from -5t-7H.1 fot>e lr7s�a/,�/ �y s/fc crn�cx r �rni/l.aF Z1a^ I '�/- � „ c.6. 6 51.0 4�.0 �1b.9 eB,3 Exist.prt ,-q' o.00, w r� rhe . y i a L�wr7 ter,(- n�/r� .�s a Se e� �y� �; �� r�x w�rh �a d ID.: 00 . p arm �1 f /2" t /c c�' Exist RI"�1-12 49.4 46 z C.B. �9 r� O h ” EXIS t, l2°P, V,I�. 19 Z r-vliw � y �f r2/1/ir� o 1-/7//7q W �IWI 5 tYi> i /// ,_'� r � �- �' /,�/-W li,c L / �/i6/QST / },; Pr6 vi, v.: i - man ri to >� f�Thr/ncv i/;I- / - r j ii :1 It }r 4; Ex /�"W J , " �.Caw g / ///--Al/a�� c��of/V /�/�i�%o�S /� �/ b� t I . ',r- /,�, � — Sew 2 r C Q ! ,� �Z j� ie/r )) t��. �sIastee�s.-17/y teles � ' - Q C I OJ �. i � ' -1 ..I of J 7,t/ith j' �� Bldg. Inv. 1 49.4 S.MF1.1 2b' 0.050 1 ,I I O > ) / 7` S.MH,1 b 47.4 BId'9, S. ".2 112' 0.013 L N > � � h �' C r3 - a r c-f�77/,�- ad rrJ t!-ans m� s3. µi.6 I�,,, 1 M C I- C � S -ti \ C.S ' / O -- S,M H."2 1 O,15 ' -- ,� ' r I \ i �l/7%c"i-7�..?,'7j I Sdce- rl?.- -0 cl :tco �l s� / Bldc- Inv,2 �8. 3' � Base e/.= 4o.o 1 i I o , I _r �� `, \ \ seC � IDfI S.rt►-1,2 19.a (►b.o-gr 2 µs9 SI'11i1,B.I. Exost.S11H 7th 0.007 � \ — — — \,, \,\ ��\ \ `� Sole !/�•� ' I� — \ \ , \\ \ \ \ / Exrst. S.w1.N. so•3 4 v. Sri" 2, � \ \ \ \ LEG EMD Q- /J \ \ // � - - - - _ 11 \\ \ ` 11\"I a/ `\ ` - _ ' ' 0 F,'I•V. Fbst- IrcJl�•-1 rOr- Valve \ \ � �� - " \ �\ � ``�� i � _ _ _ _ � �� PT-op, bitumtnous concrete curb 53,5 Prop. spot 9radc ` -,\ t\ P.P. SD.O Pro e Contour lime Sewer P rofiles - �` --s, _ ��- — —ice. Pop cath h aFan ement _�c8. Existing Pace catch basin s - _ - _ _ y -- - - - - - _ - - _ — —'�OMH Prop. drain manhole - R- Property I ne Sca le: Ho)- 1 = 40 Vert. / _ � • - ` l s' -�N - - -- _ / _ - -0s,r�l,H, Prop. sewer manhole OSr1}i. Exrstln sewer- manhole \� \,\ - _\ ' - _ - - - -� - - - - - -- - - , ` �� - - - -S- - - Prop, sewer l i►tee - — -s- — EX r S in9 sewer I i ne - , \ `! I \ \ Pioxl �IC Strc:r \ ' �, � —o— - Pro P. drain lir. o— - Existir,9 drain line r , Fes,s t1,--, - 11 � I �� F3CC- r-0Nrr"GT L-IU�1IIr "V,II " > r w�. �"✓� Pro P. Water line w Ex15t-in9 wdIter- line - I Y,nn,n use re, � , d 9Nsst only 5,9n-► k - - ! , I I � Pro • water ate / I I � I -r i/ A \ � -- , . y Existing water- date I / *— - 'I'h►3h -stci;e vva// rylthGresv:r�� r/� - 1 U- Prop gas line -y -cam -- Ex , 5tir,y yas line / - ; � _ _ , . . . . . .. _ - .aro l �a 1�A /�° s'9 F<--%1r-�-- ('+2--) - - - - - o�+o 1't�,� / \ / t I I , , Prop• chain link 7v - Exrstln9 grade / I ! 1r ` - ---� I /�� II / I ! \I I .,.'E F//�;P. T I I ll ,I _/ F�ciat' �B. ��_ Prop stone wall H.P. Hand►cap par-kirjc� / ` I i 1 .. . .Y . -A. , .., • . .. ,, I GG r7G TC 4 H7r5 ,_sire�f y ) 1 I ! / I I I - / . I . ..: f-\'P X 11 R�rr�=52,50 Inv! 47.n L ie Fes« -a Y O. Prop. �,'ard dr II / ,\ �; \ i ! l 1 , ' - _ - - - - - -- - - -rte S�. t r1E,TC�1J �)4 `� Z T: Top sf wall elev. 0 Tr3n�former air, I \ 1 rtkr �Pelic�Pl--�``'� , - - - - ��v u 13'L' gl ►� S 1 , / �� ' ` �'C� \ �fln 1,. -�— 100' w F / ~ LA2 t O ' U M.t �.. . a I�•W Bottom of wa 11 e lev —• A,f�. Ar Ura,n ;d.� C8. ' �T _ �s--- F_x(st, overh�aCj wires Exist• Edge .tet Paverrtent Q Ji 9 �� _ I !,o' �� l-�e FaC:e' - ' „(c 5 /'aY,D,6 �,. �.R,J>. — -_ D 2 0 \ \ - - '2 - - ~ P1-C cc�n��=fes c�rh ��eP rI tit �15n ,�req�.� h A 1 2 ', �- ^� i- ► r � I ,E-_-�� p 11 YD ti ?o �` \ ; Z\ r "Nand,�ap P�rklr,( s,c�r\ s}(re�'d,) L , , , Fx1st urs: t'Ljrc•Jnc1 �i LZ3nI<(!JctcB 0 (4J !11 / ,O� \ + I / I � /� yh.3 \ sqo C of��7 / _ f \ \�c� f�rghf turn or-,I" gn I(res7'�.) Pr P- �rar\,t - Curb \ , *� V !(1 r^ `� \ 7 / ) // C` \ C� "Co Plot Er\ier° St'an 1 (r�ol) _ i .s�- 4 �_ Vl � �� \ 1 - - \^ ,I ,/ X51 0� ,� \ >'s I II / l�le �rlGlrlg E-\t1%CX- Siete sign cF(re4'�. - --- -1 -I . 1 L,)c-ilt'r r,:o wall \ .� Exist G't-1.H- P '�.. 7 N i \ I I , , � ,� � � � R,m - 1.35 In./:�(0.81 Irtvdralrr=`aS,ro.- � 1'n L3-�'-J'9,1 h I i \ r - \ �--- Exist S.r'i.H• r verwith Iz" _1'� ( i I I N u'I M h ,, - ! i `� - _ �, i . I , �� t o ores leo - ��ti el, e n ( 4}- - _ \ I 4 \ Rim = 51.06 /n v. _44d.5� //� - ''9 Mri 1 r O rr \ , I _ ��}. i \ I itorle ar t-il+cr - C C I I - 1 '�.• \ abric I I = r_ � � I � I v , (b ' -Y D, 1 - \ -,i- Iv \\ , � 11 h .4 ' 53.p \ \ I \ o I k P:� - I _\ . 1�: / =- • \ I � I r I / � -1---�- =X/,.5t- (�rilit�,r�le �/yuy wig ` - - l� tt ` N �] 1 /! -•�---�---3 r-r,,n I I , J '" - \ \ t ,• I, ^ /t� 11 C.B.3 \` �� t ,1 ^ _ - I 00 S =O.00 I , I Q (1 / / L ��5- I I r �-)) r --- --------� - -4- -� ,\ -, V--' L.I'Ll �-Ah ,-1—--- -, I 11 I N I r / , � i l ; ti - 1 -i \ n ,�J I , -1- I i - �� —... - ---.-_._--� ` \ ,t, 1 Y:'G•v� 411-1-,,`.'Jr . -J.crL. : 3 \ ` / . ( 1' / ,� rIL _ _y ;;t c- pal .hrn. ,J � suns L1 rl rr ✓ , I d` / 1 ' / h' ` \. s S � \ ---- C G�er'c�f� end - f �� IJ _ / s f PCS s.0 1 -�. \\ J \J �� ', r S --I I!L jx \ () \ , __ �rxi I�j1�9ted�'1� ►��' >rr-47s 1 _- - -- s°o - - i r 1 `� D 2 h , G —1 - P - _ o- - / 1)F / l �+ 1, I S,r"LH, I Z r, I l,n 9 - / - / 1 I �\,, ( ► -o - tLY i \ -- molar, A-f �' S- I �- F -ap �- I Exist 12' dram - �, ! 1 1 3> s - `'" 0 1 T-2 /� d�a cn sror-,s trta113. !� I1fj I O Ml. Ire I S=G.;: C/o / ' 1 I �)I I 1 rn \% �\ 1. l0 �r }* i 0 �— 1 I I ,�-- �i I I 1 Ili ,o t T \ r -s ,� � 00 I n Prop, �p P,V�• ( 1 1 a F --'8e-,:F, slab typ. t� �,y', Y I — — — — r— � /� 11 n 4'l I fro rrl A D. 1 \ '`� to i I (- % I,z r rr c !`'� `' r� ,ti �� ' 1 1 � Ex�ml '0 2 Q' � (r1 /L' C.B.6 1 \ , m 5 vi 3 *�� / 1 _ 11 +. I " „ I f 11 - !- rte' ` ' w, � �a � I I i ! � � y p� ,r�' � `r- 3`f y \ J3,o '� 2 o r , `,•1G.I� i� „ -t-,,,, C � J `L 4 I�. P EX�s t /8 �' 'J 1 t , `tomIc ,Qr \ - ti 4 A,+° .N e ro c ,B,2 txllar-As(. ,� 0 I 13 ,�� '1 I 1 \ EX151' /Z�SCWGI� v r t b� , @' l',f ' .E� i �J \ \ \ T - on J }�,r` C \ , I \ If1 L xl.Sf /Z”W,j/e/- IGn V �' r( J , -`'� I \ L1 ��1 Y r \ I JnQ ` ', it s1 `r�� A a I�1i ie c'}11►P1G� C' S n C C ; �� Kr„ S .SIny• s1:7 I ,P1 I , t i G ,. - f� h T2 a-,)=,.I,.--- too w""1" PY,G. �p� \ 4 I _ _ ,� E aye. �,. = �c.o ------- --- -- - -- - t�,,�,• s1.7(typ:�� Yy(' "Xk I - '14"'I",.........,4e ^ , \ I J 1 -f Yd' Ste. ,..r--- v �, � 1i S�e-.� N _ _ I - - y;r� ' I i 1 � � � i � � �� \ �4 r�vra+� f?�,G. �f�,\,�C B.2 � T"2 thto ,Q-� .1 j., \ �-- ! 532 r 4 \ Z \ '" . . 7 0 II ��Virra Sr_r 1 ,r - :-" - I . - X I 1 \ 1 \ C ' � .(a/ �--� \ Exist bit, cone• curb C � H > .aMTY -�- .►+,�.,) . I -�.n r� _, V� � ,s� �lar7rinj strip r ,t�o,, �ira ny'v.= s� I,-- I I � r, , I Lcc-&T8 Tw \ 7 n \ 1 � COnrleCt ' �/ , P1/Cw / / h d �{ 1 I r P.,�WcJ-1 _ I i in -� 1•T � d r� r to non��r H wi�h 4% ..X +�� C T 1 O t T PLrT b V \ ` %��cs3 ,*' +Ion r I, u Ft'Is.K� 1-�hE _ `1'lT"K <T _ 1 h ' 1 I A + �I 4 �I 1 ..q 1, f'as.s �our�a d a [�Gr .\ L N•1; - - ' _ -. , ® �__� "., -.� I`, \'\-\, \ 1 .9r �N� -wttH 2 i .dl.Wll-16 .. , 47 ~ __-_-..,- .r...--`._,,.. -_._._.._-.-.--..-.. - _ _'•--_----+-T--____ -_._. �.."_ ... ..__.-...._..___ ..-.___- ___.__.____... „...__._...._._.".r......_.__- _ -_ -_-.__ __.__..._-r_.._._-.._.._-.__-.-._..... .. -_.__.--.._....._.._`...._ -. _ .._-r_._ ,�.. ..v-` ., -._ -C\._..-"__. . ,- ..._-_•___..._....-__ .-.__.__. _ ..-. -.-..,. "..._...-_-..__.._.___. _..._.....-_._.._._,_.._.--..-.w rr,_._._..._ ........____ ._.__-_-_ .-.._..___._._ _._ r r _.--...r r,.r. .. _ "J,�{I'''. � � � o �• '�� I �''/� , 1 f � LOC G `t ! f,/ I 1 IJ I I I N•r, 4q, 3 tt N � � �8 � � J v 1 S Y � SSI 3 I �--- l,, i .� -- ` F AS-v 1-t A\-T f , '�� • /�//'1 53.3 -- -- , YID Vos'" 14 D 7 I N M Y1 G.Lf- poSg . .• � � z.s c, �- 5Z .0 tiu �L,� E -- c FX/�: 'may �1 + ist ' tr . -. _ ..-.. _. -- -_ _- -- = S •' !YO ., 7.32 - } 7 "A16 i— �!!r �► ..�. !tee �..�. �.��t �ms,.�. i \ _ - - - - -- - - i v \ Yrs 1 I Mr 47.2I 4- YO p✓��`f / ,' Z. kc r> ib , ' ¢.S 14- � �a S'►/,a _ ___ -= 12pdE d� (c Vim, - 1/ X12 I S3 5° I �' / i `� ' i j �3i "'✓a S�.S i /1v✓. `" t 06 1 DOA �3 �S•Z , / i '` ;ta:. , �� ,t�rLLJ�iwLGf f� c ,�>1 .cc: .ficl�l7f� /�/,./ 1 I- S I ' J /�. / �•1 1 k ``I -� Ie FG. LiN�! - 1 I Ya IS - /_yfP P,6f,—r Y+�"►5 I - � CYC -]�' � ,�5• 1 / _ /�� 1 l,\ � raroFZn,N-r {FY�6�t�` y 1 �G. 8_ _ YY�� I i 3. 7 • .�•.,,� �..._ � ._ 1 ''VF''F;/-!�/ L I i 1` / �� r - ,'.. .F, , .- - , `• �F--i--•''F GA•I�FA1 �iN ,F 4./s. �� 4- Y p L (,[fib �,� _ :./� /7�J 1, ', ? \l`�s ` \ •O �� ITl G/a f GH L'++5/n� `f ' 1 :, __.--�_�-rte\ •a•3\ �t ( \ 'r,'•,' / , �l y - S .- O� ' - - - - - G.O/ ./�_ {-,* •) s (}� V A O 2 _ 5 -33 , .. ( ✓� v, ... _ 'ry �\ i So.Scf'os .u -r 1)4 YD 9 �i/G �3 ; i r ;r €' , i I , y c -_ \4 1�' --5�•�- �,eor'as h �oN7E��,h. ' __ i ,/ j � �,�4. _ ; � 1 ► � ',/�--sti!to ,' •,o �S, -;� � � 'A �,•' ,� � ' ' ` � / '�� <.- ,- I 1 , J \ \,,_/ S � O Ci ��/ ' � ` - -Sc - /jt�/�J''r//Y ti C.6/�!'1d` '\ // / , ,;L: •` � � i", � ', ! � ' 90 S dpi J� --_ / - t-�•,•.�G n t^_ t 1 �; - ✓ �7 r p p_ i •// �. CC 8�sv.�)I.trL7C/j Gv� I `;1,.1F wA<<_ , '�='il,o •i\�+'`, *, i f ,� ,\ I , � i � S/. ' 1 1_ \� 1 i \? .Sd i l /Nv- -� - - L-1 -T 1►� t6 1 l i/ / ' l - _ ------ s� �i 1 S-C t G" ` , IF- -O�T�L►-LIDS / / I /i - / '� ) 3 S' '" =''/4.Yj►� �. �; . C� f '�' C--'03 F3 i v�t\ - / \ F / J' ` ^Fe 'l KlF `- -- I r /• // / L �,. �' S, 11 �� //��-i ii �r� 54 , i ^� J 1y / k '• �. 1 �. ' -- - - _ ._. ly7' ..__._—__.._ ...._. �..y '�--;v. "✓ - '17 21 L/r rr -- -�-�Ai_1z h�� h� {' / ,-• '" %i �( L�^oG,�. roc/. �;k. -------- � � yam_ 6.a� `�,-/\ u. I'f�/� e' / / / / / ' f / j / l �rc'�ii vomit,.-v. - � I a4`�� . /�L•r"' �L.=5 � 1. � i �, ` �J�;r-fes =7.. Wim .• �, G 1. \ Y ti _S AFL (j� ;y, 5 r • \ ' L C-�� / / / / / / it I L i 1 l P QOlbg CUT' / / J' {p ! I ! i �� r ,/ �: \ h ; '�C% h' //�v. 'ft - � �\Gr+ ��5�1'�-�Ori �h•-aK--� -� __ _ � / � j . \ - "r '' \ I -4t% i � )�O S�,'C,j.p,�tT Q, /-,.-•- / - q; f i / I \ . �5�._ 1J,,H� r �... I x ' ,, / \ i I - , /�kc-A� 1 T. I r. , i •, j / I � I P\-1 CLS � � ,-,�'�i" �,\' l i �,Vr i �, I '� �' ( t + of , '� � t I '\ � � 1 PY It / _---•-- � --__-__ __ . ,,/rrear`' ' .Srov� Wi►Lc ,� � � ,� � ,\ \ l :._.__ 5�.6 � ! !.�` I l AxAs l-:T N, \/ % / i �\ �� _,, � J ,•�'/ r •!!~ `� / r/ r ' ) -.j � 2 p ��alt` o ' �'I� � 6 t 1 j \ �(ad v Q j i /711 0QJ N C-5 �4f2 SLlf1 �UR�t�GE BoRI r,r- -_ ,T _ J . -- � '�, _ �� 1(' 3t I Nn OI ycf -th.s-r;Yom+N at) 1 N fl►c�tsTES P'T�-1 Q _ h 0 r ( ! _ OTr" This /art /� rlct Y,/� *9 vSed for COr7Sf UGt/JI r — ---•^ j- l W /Z/,� 7. /'j t I Jr�oSC_5, 7 DAr� ,,//9 rn SHEETN� kES F. -. r ,U GLEY _ GROSVENOR MOUSE �_. No 8586 ) -_. ' �' r • .'�� .•» �..•�,,, Fss E�� ,� � t-� � 7 LO EM GMASSACHUSETTSHILLS AVENUE rr.r - -- a s4Csc SALEM, s I � I �• +�&,i I'(=r '� �t�AK�^,.% �, 4 . �,i. NURSING HOME 123 BED LOT D-I 1 ► - _...-.�E.1_ . �:.LcS�1_fvt;`t...�s!t� A.�_4'-i1r+.,,�_r t..��_c- �_l_�---• -........____. .-..,_.._....__...._.. ..._..._. _ _ .. _ -- __ . .__ _-_ --____ _._..__------ -- ----` T• �P k