The URL can be used to link to this page

78 LEAVITT STREET - ZONING GFSGEOLOGICAL FIELD SERVICES, INC. PALMERS COVE YACHT CLUB SALEM, MA 1 � ENVIRONMENTAL NOTIFICATION FORM SUBMITTED TO: EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRES MEPA OFFICE 100 CAMBRIDGE ST, SUITE 900 BOSTON, MA 02114 ' Prepared for: Palmers Cove Yacht Club Inc 78 Leavitt Street Salem, MA 01970 Prepared by: Geological Field Services, Inc. 14 Hubon Street Salem, MA 01970 November 17, 2016 ' 14 Hubon Street, Salem,Massachusetts 01970 Tel: (978) 594-1376 TABLE OF CONTENTS Environmental Notification Form Appendix A Project Narrative , Figures Tables ' Attachment A Previous Dredging Permits Attachment B Previous Chapter 91 License Attachment C DMF Comments and Response , Attachment D Grain Size Analyses Attachment E Order of Conditions Appendix B Mailing List i Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act (MEPA) Office tEnvironmental Notification Form For Office Use Only EEA#: - MEPA Analyst: The information requested on this form must be completed in order to submit a document electronically for review under the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act, 301 CMR 11.00. Project Name: Palmers Cove Yacht Club, Inc. Street Address: 74 Leavitt Street Municipality: Salem Watershed: North Coast Universal Transverse Mercator Latitude: 42 30' 49" Coordinates: Longitude: 70 53' 15" 344,955 4,708,534 Estimated commencement date: Oct 2016 Estimated completion date: Spring 2019 Project Type: Maintenance Dredging Status of project design: 80 %complete Proponent: Palmers Cove Yacht Club, Inc. Street Address: 74 Leavitt Street Municipality: Salem I State: MA Zip Code:01970 Name of Contact Person: Luke Fabbri Firm/Agency: Geological Field Street Address:14 Hubon Street Services, Inc Municipality: Salem I State: MA Zi Code:01970 Phone: 978 594-1376 Fax: NA E-mail: lafabbri.gfs@hotmail.com Does this project meet or exceed a mandatory EIR threshold (see 301 CMR 11.03)? ❑Yes X No Ili If this is an Expanded Environmental Notification Form (ENF) (see 301 CMR 11.05(7))or a Notice of Project Change (NPC), are you requesting: a Single EIR? (see 301 CMR 11.06(8)) ❑Yes ❑No a Special Review Procedure? (see301CMR 11.09) ❑Yes ❑No a Waiver of mandatory EIR? (see 301 CMR 11.11) ❑Yes [-]No a Phase I Waiver? (see301 CMR11.11) ❑Yes ❑No (Note: Greenhouse Gas Emissions analysis must be included in the Expanded ENF.) Which MEPA review threshold(s) does the project meet or exceed (see 301 CMR 11.03)? Dredging >10,000 yds3 Alteration of> 1/2 acre Land Under Water Which State Agency Permits will the project require? MADEP Ch 91, 401 Water Quality Certification Identify any financial assistance or land transfer from an Agency of the Commonwealth, including the Agency name and the amount of funding or land area in acres: ' Effective January 2011 Summary of Project Size Existing Change Total & Environmental Impacts . Total site acreage N/A New acres of land altered ° Acres of impervious area N/A N/A N/A Square feet of new bordering ° vegetated wetlands alteration Square feet of new other wetland alteration Acres of new non-water dependent use of tidelands or waterways ° Gross square footage N/A N/A N/A t Number of housing units N/A N/A N/A Maximum height (feet) N/A N/A N/A TRANSPORTATION Vehicle trips per day N/A N/A N/A Parking spaces WASTEWATER Water Use (Gallons per day) N/A N/A N/A Water withdrawal (GPD) N/A N/A N/A Wastewater generation/treatment N/A N/A N/A , (GPD) Length of water mains (miles) N/A N/A N/A Length of sewer mains (miles) N/A N/A N/A , Has this project been filed with MEPA before? ❑ Yes (EEA# ) X No Has any project on this site been filed with MEPA before? X Yes (EEA# 3868 (Aug 1980) ) [:]No r -2- GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION - all proponents must fill out this section PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Describe the existing conditions and land uses on the project site: See Appendix A Describe the proposed project and its programmatic and physical elements: _See Appendix A NOTE: The project description should summarize both the project's direct and indirect impacts (including construction period impacts) in terms of their magnitude, geographic extent, duration and frequency, and reversibility, as applicable. It should also discuss the infrastructure requirements of the project and the capacity of the municipal and/or regional infrastructure to sustain these requirements into the future. Describe the on-site project alternatives (and alternative off-site locations, if applicable), considered by the proponent, including at least one feasible alternative that is allowed under current zoning, and the reasons(s) that they were not selected as the preferred alternative: _See Appendix A NOTE: The purpose of the alternatives analysis is to consider what effect changing the parameters and/or siting of a project, or components thereof, will have on the environment, keeping in mind that the objective of the MEPA review process is to avoid or minimize damage to the environment to the greatest extent feasible. Examples of alternative projects include alternative site locations, alternative site uses, and alternative site configurations. Summarize the mitigation measures proposed to offset the impacts of the preferred alternative: If the project is proposed to be constructed in phases, please describe each phase: L AREAS OF CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN: Is the project within or adjacent to an Area of Critical Environmental Concern? ❑Yes(Specify ) X No if yes, does the ACEC have an approved Resource Management Plan?_Yes _No; If yes, describe how the project complies with this plan. i Will there be stormwater runoff or discharge to the designated ACEC?_Yes _No; If yes, describe and assess the potential impacts of such stormwater runoff/discharge to the designated ACEC. RARE SPECIES: Does the project site include Estimated and/or Priority Habitat of State-Listed Rare Species? (see hftp://www.mass.gov/dfwele/dfw/n hesp/regulatory_review/priority_habitat/priority_habitat_home.htm) ❑Yes (Specify ) X No HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Does the project site include any structure, site or district listed in the State Register of Historic Place or the inventory of Historic and Archaeological Assets of the Commonwealth? ❑Yes (Specify ) X No If yes, does the project involve any demolition or destruction of any listed or inventoried historic or archaeological resources? ❑Yes (Specify ) X No -3- WATER RESOURCES: Is there an Outstanding Resource Water(ORW)on or within a half-mile radius of the project site? _Yes_X_No; if yes, identify the ORW and its location. (NOTE: Outstanding Resource Waters include Class A public water supplies,their tributaries, and bordering wetlands; active and inactive reservoirs approved by MassDEP;certain waters within Areas of•Critical Environmental Concern, and certified vernal pools. Outstanding resource waters are listed in the Surface Water Quality Standards, 314 CMR 4.00.) Are there any impaired water bodies on or within a half-mile radius of the project site? _X_Yes_No; if yes, identify the water body and pollutant(s)causing the impairment: Salem Harbor_Bacteria Is the project within a medium or high stress basin, as established by the Massachusetts r Water Resources Commission? Yes –X—No STORMWATER MANAGEMENT: ,1 Generally describe the project's stormwater impacts and measures that the project will take to comply with the standards found in MassDEP's Stormwater Management Regulations:—NONE MASSACHUSETTS CONTINGENCY PLAN: Has the project site been, or is it currently being, regulated under M.G.L.c.21 E or the Massachusetts Contingency Plan site (including Release Tracking Number(RTN), cleanup phase, and Response Action Outcome classification):_No Is there an Activity and Use Limitation (AUL)on any portion of the project site?Yes_No_X_, if yes, describe which portion of the site and how the project will be consistent with the AUL: Are you aware of any Reportable Conditions at the property that have not yet been assigned an RTN? Yes _No –X—; if yes, please describe: SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTE: If the project will generate solid waste during demolition or construction, describe alternatives considered for re-use, recycling, and disposal of, e.g., asphalt, brick, concrete, gypsum, metal, wood:— No-(NOTE:Asphalt pavement, brick, concrete and metal are banned from disposal at Massachusetts landfills and waste combustion facilities and wood is banned from disposal af Massachusetts landfills. See 310 CMR 19.017 for the complete list of banned materials.) Will your project disturb asbestos containing materials?Yes _No _X_ if yes, please consult state asbestos requirements at http://mass.gov/MassDEP/air/asbhom0l.htm Describe anti-idling and other measures to limit emissions from construction equipment:_NA DESIGNATED WILD AND SCENIC RIVER: Is this project site located wholly or partially within a defined river corridor of a federally designated Wild and Scenic River or a state designated Scenic River?Yes_No _X_, if yes, specify name of river and designation: If yes, does the project have the potential to impact any of the "outstandingly remarkable' resources of a federally Wild and Scenic River or the stated purpose of a state designated Scenic River? Yes _No _; if yes, specify name of river and designation: if yes, will the project will result in any impacts to any of the designated "outstandingly remarkable' resources of the Wild and Scenic River or the stated purposes of a Scenic River. Yes No _ if yes,describe the potential impacts to one or more of the"outstandingly remarkable'resources or stated purposes and mitigation measures proposed. -4- ATTACHMENTS: ' 1. List of all attachments to this document. 2. U.S.G.S. map (good quality color copy, 8-%x 11 inches or larger, at a scale of 1:24,000) indicating the project location and boundaries. See Appendix A 3.. Plan, at an appropriate scale, of existing conditions on the project site and its immediate environs, showing all known structures, roadways and parking lots, railroad rights-of-way, wetlands and water bodies, wooded areas,farmland, steep slopes, public open spaces, and major utilities. See Appendix A 4 Plan, at an appropriate scale, depicting environmental constraints on or adjacent to the project site such as Priority and/or Estimated Habitat of state-listed rare species, Areas of Critical Environmental Concern, Chapter 91 jurisdictional areas,Article 97 lands, wetland resource area delineations, water supply protection areas, and historic resources and/or districts. See Appendix A 5. Plan, at an appropriate scale, of proposed conditions upon completion of project(if construction of the project is proposed to be phased,there should be a site plan showing conditions upon the completion of each phase). See Appendix A 6. List of all agencies and persons to whom the proponent circulated the ENE, in accordance with 301 CMR 11.16(2). See Appendix B 7. List of municipal and federal permits and reviews required by the project, as applicable. Order of Conditions -City of Salem MEPA Environmental Notification Form (ENF)-Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs(EOEEA) 401 Water Quality Certification -Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MADEP) Chapter 91 License—MADEP U.S. Army Corps of Engineers(USACE)Permit-USACE MA Costal Zone Management Federal Consistence-Costal Zone Management(CZM) Essential Fish Habitat Assessment—Division of Marine Fisheries (DMF) LAND SECTION —all proponents must fill out this section I. Thresholds/Permits A. Does the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to land (see 301 CMR 11.03(1) _Yes_X_No; if yes, specify each threshold: It. Impacts and Permits A. Describe, in acres, the current and proposed character of the project site, as follows: Existing Change Total Footprint of buildings 0= _0 0 _0 Internal roadways 0 0 Parking and other paved areas 0 _0 _0 Other altered areas 0 =0 =0 Undeveloped areas 0 0 0 Total: Project Site Acreage 0 0 0 B. Has any part of the project site been in active agricultural use in the last five years? _Yes X No; if yes, how many acres of land in agricultural use (with prime state or Focally important agricultural soils)will be converted to nonagricultural use? C. Is any part of the project site currently or proposed to be in active forestry use? _Yes_X_No; if yes, please describe current and proposed forestry activities and indicate whether any part of the site is the subject of a forest management plan approved by 1 the Department of Conservation and Recreation: -5- D. Does any part of the project involve conversion of land held for natural resources purposes in accordance with Article 97 of the Amendments to the Constitution of the Commonwealth to any purpose not in accordance with Article 97?_Yes_X_No; if yes, describe: E. Is any part of the project site currently subject to a conservation restriction, preservation restriction, agricultural preservation restriction or watershed preservation restriction?_ Yes_X_No; if yes, does the project involve the release or modification of such restriction? Yes_No; if yes, describe: F. Does the project require approval of a new urban redevelopment project or a fundamental change in an existing urban redevelopment project under M.G.L.c.121A? _Yes_X_No; if yes, describe: G. Does the project require approval of a new urban renewal plan or a major modification of an existing urban renewal plan under M.G.L.c.121 B?Yes_No X_; if yes, describe: III. Consistency A. Identify the current municipal comprehensive land use plan Title: Point Neighborhood Historic Resources Survey and Preservation Plan Date 2006 B. Describe the project's consistency with that plan with regard to: 1) economic development Brings boaters to the neighborhood who purchase supplies from local establishments and dine in the area 2) adequacy of infrastructure Provides equipment for emergency removal of vessels in distress 3) open space impacts Provides access to ocean by maintaining a boat ramp and travel lift 4) compatibility with adjacent land uses PCYC has been in the neighborhood since before 1946 C. Identify the current Regional Policy Plan of the applicable Regional Planning Agency(RPA) RPA: Metropolitan Area Planning Council (MAPC) Title:—Salem Point Neighborhood Vision Date-2013 Describe the project's consistency with that plan with regard to: 1) economic development Brings boaters to the neighborhood who purchase supplies from local establishments and ding in the area 2) adequacy of infrastructure Provides equipment for emergency removal of vessels in distress 3) open space impacts: Provides access to ocean by maintaining a boat ramp and travel lift i 6 RARE SPECIES SECTION I. Thresholds I Permits A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to rare species or habitat(see 301 CMR 11.03(2))? _Yes_X_No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: (NOTE: If you are uncertain, it is recommended that you consult with the Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program (NHESP)prior to submitting the ENF.) B. Does the project require any state permits related to rare species or habitat? _Yes _X_No C. Does the project site fall within mapped rare species habitat(Priority or Estimated Habitat?) in the current Massachusetts Natural Heritage Atlas (attach relevant page)? _Yes_X_No. D. If you answered "No"to all questions A, B and C, proceed to the Wetlands,Waterways, and Tidelands Section. If you answered "Yes"to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Rare Species section below. ` It. Impacts and Permits A. Does the project site fall within Priority or Estimated Habitat in the current Massachusetts Natural Heritage Atlas (attach relevant page)? _Yes_No. If yes, 1. Have you consulted with the Division of Fisheries and Wildlife Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program (NHESP)? _Yes_No; if yes, have you received a determination as to whether the project will result in the"take"of a rare species? _ Yes_No; if yes, attach the letter of determination to this submission. 2. Will the project"take' an endangered, threatened, and/or species of special concern in accordance with M.G.L. c.131 A(see also 321 CMR 10.04)? _Yes_No; if yes, provide a summary of proposed measures to minimize and mitigate rare species impacts 3. Which rare species are known to occur within the Priority or Estimated Habitat? 4. Has the site been surveyed for rare species in accordance with the Massachusetts Endangered Species Act? _Yes_No 4. If your project is within Estimated Habitat, have you filed a Notice of Intent or received an Order of Conditions for this project? Yes_No; if yes, did you send a copy of the Notice of Intent to the Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program, in accordance with the Wetlands Protection Act regulations? _Yes_No B. Will the project"take'an endangered, threatened, and/or species of special concern in accordance with M.G.L. c.1 31A(see also 321 CMR 10.04)? _Yes _No; if yes, provide a summary of proposed measures to minimize and mitigate impacts to significant habitat: 7 WETLANDS, WATERWAYS, AND TIDELANDS SECTION I. Thresholds/Permits A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to wetlands, waterways, and tidelands (see 301 CMR 11.03(3))? _X_Yes_No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: Dredging 10,000 cy(25,000 cy proposed), alteration of> %acre of land underwater(220,315 sq ft proposed) B. Does the project require any state permits (or a local Order of Conditions) related to wetlands, waterways,or tidelands? _X_Yes_No; if yes, specify which permit: Chapter 91 License, Section 401 Water Quality Certification, Order of Conditions C. If you answered "No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Water Supply Section. If you answered "Yes"to either question A or question B,fill out the remainder of the Wetlands, Waterways, and Tidelands Section below. If.Wetlands Impacts and Permits I A. ,Does the project require a new or amended Order of Conditions under the Wetlands Protection Act(M.G.L. c.131A)? _X_Yes_No; if yes, has a Notice of Intent been filed?_X_Yes No; if yes, list the date and MassDEP file number:_64-609_; if yes, has a local Order of Conditions been issued? _X_Yes_No; Was the Order of Conditions appealed? _Yes _X_No. Will the project require a Variance from the Wetlands regulations?_Yes_X_No. B. Describe any proposed permanent or temporary impacts to wetland resource areas located on the project site: See Appendix A C. Estimate the extent and type of impact that the project will have on wetland resources, and indicate whether the impacts are temporary or permanent: Coastal Wetlands Area (square feet)or Temporary or Length (linear feet) Permanent Impact? Land Under the Ocean _217,112 sq ft_ Temp Designated Port Areas 0 Coastal Beaches 2,292 sq ft_ Temp Coastal Dunes 0 Barrier Beaches 0 Coastal Banks 0 Rocky Intertidal Shores 0 Salt Marshes 0 Land Under Salt Ponds 0 Land Containing Shellfish 19,154 sq It_ Temp Fish Runs 650 ft Temp Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage 0 Inland Wetlands Bank (If) 0 Bordering Vegetated Wetlands 0 Isolated Vegetated Wetlands 0 Land under Water 0 Isolated Land Subject to Flooding 0 Borderi ng Land Subject to Flooding 0 Riverfront Area 0 D. Is any part of the project: 1. proposed as a limited project? _Yes_X No; if yes,what is the area (in sf)? 2. the construction or alteration of a dam? —Yes_X_No; if yes, describe: 3. fill or structure in a velocity zone or regulatory floodway? _Yes_ criX No 4. dredging or disposal of dredged material? _X_Yes_No; if yes, desbe the volume of dredged material and the proposed disposal site: –25,000 MASS BAY DISPOSAL SITE 5. a discharge to an Outstanding Resource Water(ORW) or an Area of Critical Environmental Concern (ACEC)? Yes_X_No 6. subject to a wetlands restriction order? _Yes_X_No; if yes, identify the area (in so: 7. located in buffer zones? Yes_X_No; if yes, how much (in sf) E. Will the project: 1. be subject to a local wetlands ordinance or bylaw? X–Yes --No 2. alter any federally-protected wetlands not regulated under state law? _Yes_X_ No; if yes, what is the area (sf)? III.Waterways and Tidelands Impacts and Permits A. Does the project site contain waterways or tidelands (including filled former tidelands)that are subject to the Waterways Act, M.G.L.c.91? XYes No; if yes, is there a current Chapter 91 License or Permit affecting the project site? _X__Yes --No; if yes, list the date and license or permit number and provide a copy of the historic map used to determine extent of filled tidelands: See Appendix A. B. Does the project require anew or modified license or permit under M.G.L.c.91?_X Yes No; if yes, how many acres of the project site subject to M.G.L.c.91 will be for non-water- dependent use? Current _0_ Change _0_ Total _0_ If yes, how many square feet of solid fill or pile-supported structures(in sf)? 0 C. For non-water-dependent use projects, indicate the following: Area of filled tidelands on the site: NA Area of filled tidelands covered by—buildings:—NA For portions of site on filled tidelands, list ground floor uses and area of each use: 1 NA Does the project include new non-water-dependent uses located over flowed tidelands? Yes_No_X_ Height of building on filled tidelands—NA Also show the following on a site plan: Mean High Water, Mean Low Water, Water- dependent Use Zone, location of uses within buildings on tidelands, and interior and exterior areas and facilities dedicated for public use, and historic high and historic low water marks. D. Is the project located on landlocked tidelands? --Yes _X_No; if yes, describe the project's impact on the public's right to access, use and enjoy jurisdictional tidelands and describe measures the project will implement to avoid, minimize or mitigate any adverse impact: E. Is the project located in an area where low groundwater levels have been identified by a municipality or by a state or federal agency as a threat to building foundations?_Yes X No; if yes, describe the project's impact on groundwater levels and describe measures the project will implement to avoid, minimize or mitigate any adverse impact: 9 r F. Is the project non-water-dependent and located on landlocked tidelands or waterways or tidelands subject to the Waterways Act and subject to a mandatory EIR?_Yes_X_ No; (NOTE:If yes, then the project will be subject to Public Benefit Review and Determination.) G. Does the project include dredging?_X_Yes_No; if yes, answer the following questions: What type of dredging? Improvement_Maintenance_X_Both What is the proposed dredge volume, in cubic yards (cys)_25,000 What is the proposed dredge footprint 445 length (ft) 615_width (ft)_-8_depth (ft); Will dredging impact the following resource areas? Intertidal Yes_X_ No_; if yes, 2,292 sq ft Outstanding Resource Waters Yes_ No_X_; if yes,_sq ft Other resource area (i.e. shellfish beds, eel grass beds) Yes—X— No_; if yes _19,154_sq ft Blue Mussel Beds If yes to any of the above, have you evaluated appropriate and practicable steps to: 1)avoidance; 2) if avoidance is not possible, minimization; 3)if either avoidance or minimize is not possible, mitigation? After filing the Notice of Intent with the Salem Conservation Commission a dialog was had with the Division of Marine Fisheries (DMF). DMF provided comments and requested additional information.The applicant responded and proposed several measures to reduce impacts. DMF acknowledged the measures in a favorable follow up respond. See Appendix A for the full DMF correspondence. If no to any of the above, what information or documentation was used to support this determination? Provide a comprehensive analysis of practicable alternatives for improvement dredging in accordance with 314 CMR 9.07(1)(b). Physical and chemical data of the sediment shall be included in the comprehensive analysis. See Appendix A Chemical data is not currently available. Implementation of this project depends on a favorable approval for ocean disposal. Sediment Characterization Existing gradation analysis results? —X—Yes No: if yes, provide results. Existing chemical results for parameters listed in 314 CMR 9.07(2)(b)6?_Yes _X_No; if yes, provide results. Do you have sufficient information to evaluate feasibility of the following management options for dredged sediment? Not at this time If yes, check the appropriate option. Beach Nourishment_P I Unconfined Ocean Dis osal Confined Disposal: Confined Aquatic Disposal (CAD)_ Confined Disposal Facility(CDF)_ Landfill Reuse in accordance with COMM-97-001 Shoreline Placement_ Upland Material Reuse_ In-State landfill disposal_ Out-of-state landfill disposal (NOTE: This information is required for a 401 Water Quality Certification.) IV. Consistency: A. Does the project have effects on the coastal resources or uses, and/or is the project located within the Coastal Zone?_X_Yes No; if yes, describe these effects and the projects consistency with the policies of the Office of Coastal Zone Management: This project is maintenance dredging and complies with all applicable CZM Policies -10- C. Is the project located within an area subject to a Municipal Harbor Plan? _X_Yes_No; if yes, identify the Municipal Harbor Plan and describe the project's consistency with that plan: Salem Harbor Plan 2008.The proposed project is consistent with the SHP by maintaining Palmer Cove Channel through maintenance dredging and improving water quality by improving circulation in the marina basin. WATER SUPPLY SECTION I. Thresholds/ Permits A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to water supply (see 301 CMR 11.03(4))? Yes_X_No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: rB. Does the project require any state permits related to water supply? _Yes_X_No; if yes, specify which permit: ' C. If you answered "No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Wastewater Section. If you answered "Yes"to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Water Supply Section below. II. Impacts and Permits A. Describe, in gallons per day(gpd), the volume and source of water use for existing and proposed activities at the project site: Existing Change Total Municipal or regional water supply Withdrawal from groundwater Withdrawal from surface water Interbasin transfer (NOTE: Interbasin Transfer approval will be required if the basin and community where the proposed water supply source is located is different from the basin and community where the wastewater from the source will be discharged.) B. If the source is a municipal or regional supply, has the municipality or region indicated that there is adequate capacity in the system to accommodate the project?_Yes_No C. If the project involves a new or expanded withdrawal from a groundwater or surface water !� source, has a pumping test been conducted? _Yes_No; if yes, attach a map of the drilling sites and a summary of the alternatives considered and the results. D. What is the currently permitted withdrawal at the proposed water supply source (in gallons per day)?Will the project require an increase in that withdrawal?_Yes _No; if yes, then how much of an increase (gpd)? E. Does the project site currently contain a water supply well, a drinking water treatment facility, water main, or other water supply facility, or will the project involve construction of a new facility? Yes_No. If yes, describe existing and proposed water supply facilities at the project site: Permitted Existing Avg Project Flow Total Flow Daily Flow Capacity of water supply well(s) (gpd) Capacity of water treatment plant(gpd) F. If the project involves a new interbasin transfer of water, which basins are involved, what is the direction of the transfer, and is the interbasin transfer existing or proposed? G. Does the project involve: 1. new water service by the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority or other agency of the Commonwealth to a municipality or water district? —Yes_No 2. a Watershed Protection Act variance? Yes_No; if yes, how many acres of alteration? 3. a non-bridged stream crossing 1,000 or less feet upstream of a public surface drinking water supply for purpose of forest harvesting activities? _Yes_No III. Consistency Describe the project's consistency with water conservation plans or other plans to enhance water resources, quality, facilities and services: WASTEWATER SECTION I. Thresholds/ Permits ' A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to wastewater(see 301 CMR 11.03(5))? _Yes_X_No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to wastewater? _Yes_X_No; if yes, specify which permit: C. If you answered "No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Transportation --Traffic t Generation Section. If you answered "Yes"to either question A or question B,fill out the remainder of the Wastewater Section below. II. Impacts and Permits A. Describe the volume (in gallons per day)and type of disposal of wastewater generation for existing and proposed activities at the project site(calculate according to 310 CMR 15.00 for septic systems or 314 CMR 7.00 for sewer systems): Existin Change Total Discharge of sanitary wastewater Discharge of industrial wastewater TOTAL Existing Change Total Discharge to groundwater Discharge to outstanding resource water Discharge to surface water Discharge to municipal or regional wastewater facility TOTAL B. Is the existing collection system at or near its capacity? _Yes_No; if yes, then describe the measures to be undertaken to accommodate the project's wastewater flows: C. Is the existing wastewater disposal facility at or near its permitted capacity?_Yes_No; if yes, then describe the measures to be undertaken to accommodate the project's wastewater flows: D. Does the project site currently contain a wastewater treatment facility, sewer main, or other wastewater disposal facility, or will the project involve construction of a new facility? _Yes No; if yes, describe as follows: Permitted Existing Avg Prolect Flow Total Daily Flow Wastewater treatment plant capacity (in gallons per day) E. If the project requires an interbasin transfer of wastewater, which basins are involved,what is the direction of the transfer, and is the interbasin transfer existing or new? (NOTE:Interbasin Transfer approval may be needed if the basin and community where wastewater will be discharged is different from the basin and community where the source of water supply is located.) F. Does the project involve new sewer service by the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority (MWRA)or other Agency of the Commonwealth to a municipality or sewer district? Yes No G. Is there an existing facility, or is a new facility proposed at the project site for the storage, treatment, processing, combustion or disposal of sewage sludge, sludge ash, grit, screenings, wastewater reuse (gray water) or other sewage residual materials? _Yes_No; if yes, what is the capacity(tons per day): Existing Change Total Storage Treatment Processing Combustion Disposal tH. Describe the water conservation measures to be undertaken by the project, and other wastewater mitigation, such as infiltration and inflow removal. III. Consistency A. Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with applicable state, regional, and local plans and policies related to wastewater management: B. If the project requires a sewer extension permit, is that extension included in a comprehensive wastewater management plan? _Yes_No; if yes, indicate the EEA number for the plan and whether the project site is within a sewer service area recommended or approved in that plan: TRANSPORTATION SECTION (TRAFFIC GENERATION) � I. Thresholds/Permit A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to traffic generation (see 301 CMR 11.03(6))? _Yes_X_No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to state-controlled roadways?_Yes_X_ No; if yes, specify which permit: C. If you answered "No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Roadways and Other Transportation Facilities Section. If you answered "Yes"to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Traffic Generation Section below. 13- II. Traffic Impacts and Permits t A. Describe existing and proposed vehicular traffic generated by activities at the project site: Existing Chane Total Number of parking spaces Number of vehicle trips per day ITE Land Use Code(s): B. What is the estimated average daily traffic on roadways serving the site? ' Roadway Existing Change Total 1. 2. 3. C. If applicable, describe proposed mitigation measures on state-controlled roadways that the project proponent will implement: D. How will the project implement and/or promote the use of transit, pedestrian and bicycle facilities , and services to provide access to and from the project site? C. Is there a Transportation Management Association (TMA)that provides transportation demand management(TDM)services in the area of the project site? _Yes_No; if yes, describe , if and how will the project will participate in the TMA: D. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of)water, rail, or air transportation facilities?_Yes_No; if yes, generally describe: E. If the project will penetrate approach airspace of a nearby airport, has the proponent filed a Massachusetts Aeronautics Commission Airspace Review Form (780 CMR 111.7)and a'Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) r (CFR Title 14 Part 77.13, forms 7460-1 and 7460-2)? III. Consistency Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with municipal, regional, state, and federal plans and policies related to traffic,transit, pedestrian and bicycle transportation facilities and services: TRANSPORTATION SECTION (ROADWAYS AND OTHER TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES) I. Thresholds A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to roadways or other transportation facilities(see 301 CMR 11.03(6))? Yes_X_No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: pp B. Does the project require any state permits related to roadways or other transportation facilities? _Yes_X_No; if yes, specify which permit: C. If you answered "No" to both questions A and B, proceed to the Energy Section. If you answered "Yes"to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Roadways Section below. II.Transportation Facility Impacts A. Describe existing and proposed transportation facilities in the immediate vicinity of the project site: - 14- r B. Will the project involve any 1. Alteration of bank or terrain (in linear feet)? 2. Cutting of living public shade trees(number)? 3. Elimination of stone wall (in linear feet)? 111. Consistency-- Describe the project's consistency with other federal, state, regional, and local plans 1 and policies related to traffic, transit, pedestrian and bicycle transportation facilities and services, including consistency with the applicable regional transportation plan and the Transportation Improvements Plan (TIP), the State Bicycle Plan, and the State Pedestrian Plan: ENERGY SECTION I. Thresholds/Permits A.Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to energy(see 301 CMR 11.03(7))? Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: ' B. Does the project require any state permits related to energy? _Yes_X_No; if yes, specify which permit: C. If you answered "No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Air Quality Section. If you answered "Yes"to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Energy Section below. II. Impacts and Permits A. Describe existing and proposed energy generation and transmission facilities at the project site: ExistingChange Total Capacity of electric generating facility(megawatts) Length of fuel line(in miles) Length of transmission lines (in miles) Capacity of transmission lines (in kilovolts) B. If the project involves construction or expansion of an electric generating facility, what are: 1. the facility's current and proposed fuel source(s)? 2. the facility's current and proposed cooling source(s)? C. If the project involves construction of an electrical transmission line,will it be located on a new, unused, or abandoned right of way?_Yes No; if yes, please describe: D. Describe the project's other impacts on energy facilities and services: III. Consistency Describe the project's consistency with state, municipal, regional, and federal plans and policies for enhancing energy facilities and services: AIR QUALITY SECTION 1. Thresholds A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to air quality(see 301 CMR 11.03(8))? _Yes_X_No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to air quality? _Yes_X_No; if yes, specify which permit: C. If you answered "No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Solid and Hazardous Waste Section. If you answered "Yes"to either question A or question B,fill out the remainder of the Air Quality Section below. - 15- r II. Impacts and Permits A. Does the project involve construction or modification of a major stationary source (see 310 CMR 7.00, Appendix A)? Yes No; if yes, describe existing and proposed emissions (in tons per day)of: Existing Change Total Particulate matter Carbon monoxide Sulfur dioxide Volatile organic compounds Oxides of nitrogen Lead Any hazardous air pollutant Carbon dioxide B. Describe the project's other impacts on air resources and air quality, including noise impacts: III. Consistency A. Describe the project's consistency with the State Implementation Plan: , B. Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with other federal, state, regional, and local plans and policies related to air resources and air quality: SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION I. Thresholds/ Permits A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to solid or hazardous waste (see 301 CMR 11.03(9))? _Yes_X_No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to solid and hazardous waste? _Yes _X_No; if yes, specify which permit: C. If you answered "No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Historical and Archaeological Resources Section. If you answered "Yes"to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Solid and Hazardous Waste Section below. If. Impacts and Permits A. Is there any current or proposed facility at the project site for the storage,treatment, processing, combustion or disposal of solid waste?_Yes_No; if yes, what is the volume (in tons per day) of the capacity: Existing Change Total Storage Treatment, processing Combustion Disposal B. Is there any current or proposed facility at the project site for the storage, recycling, treatment or disposal of hazardous waste?_Yes_No; if yes, what is the volume (in tons or gallons per day) of the capacity: Existing Change Total Storage Recycling 16 Treatment Disposal ' C. If the project will generate solid waste (for example, during demolition or construction), describe alternatives considered for re-use, recycling, and disposal: D. If the project involves demolition, do any buildings to be demolished contain asbestos? Yes No 1 E. Describe the project's other solid and hazardous waste impacts (including indirect impacts): III. Consistency Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with the State Solid Waste Master Plan: HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES SECTION 1. Thresholds/Impacts A. Have you consulted with the Massachusetts Historical Commission? _Yes X No; if yes, attach correspondence. For project sites involving lands under water, have you consulted with the Massachusetts Board of Underwater Archaeological Resources?Yes X No; if yes, attach correspondence B. Is any part of the project site a historic structure, or a structure within a historic district, in either case listed in the State Register of Historic Places or the Inventory of Historic and Archaeological Assets of the Commonwealth? _Yes X No; if yes, does the project involve the demolition of all or any exterior part of such historic structure? _Yes_No; if yes, please describe: C. Is any part of the project site an archaeological site listed in the State Register of Historic Places or the Inventory of Historic and Archaeological Assets of the Commonwealth? _Yes X_No; if yes, does the project involve the destruction of all or any part of such archaeological site? _Yes No; if yes, please describe: D. If you answered "No"to all parts of both questions A, B and C, proceed to the Attachments and ' Certifications Sections. If you answered "Yes"to any part of either question A or question B,fill out the remainder of the Historical and Archaeological Resources Section below. II. Impacts Describe and assess the project's impacts, direct and indirect, on listed or inventoried historical and archaeological resources: III. Consistency Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with federal, state,regional, and local plans and policies related to preserving historical and archaeological resources: 17 t CERTIFICTIONS: 1. The Public Notice of Environmental Review has been/will be published in the following newspapers In accordance with 301 CMR 11.15(1): (Name)_Salem Evening News (Date) November 29,2016 2. This form has been circulated to Agencies and Persons in accordance with 301 CMR 11.16(2). Signatures: —! Date Signature o Responsib e � Date VSignature of person preparing or Proponent ENF(if different from above) Laurence G.Robertie Luke Fabbri Name(print or type) Name(print or type) Palmer's Cove Yacht Club,Inc. Geological Field Services,Inc. Firm/Agency Firm/Agency 74 Leavitt Street 14 Hubon Street t Street Street Salem MA 01970 Salem MA 01970 Municipality/State/Zip- -- -- — — — Municipality/State/Zip 978-774-9722 978-594-1376 Phone Phone 18 I 1 I D m ' � z 0 X D r r i 1 i 1 l i i 1 L 1 1 1 t i 1 t E t I E t APPENDIX A PROJECT NARRATIVE PALMER'S COVE YACHT CLUB SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS A. INTRODUCTION The Palmer's Cove Yacht Club (PCYC) is proposing four activities at the existing marina including: "Maintenance Dredging"of an area within Salem Harbor; establishing a "Reconfiguration Zone" for the marina basin; a"Request To Retain Unpermitted Structures"within the marina to accommodate variations in the existing structures compare to the permitted structures and a"Request to Expand"the number of permitted piles and to extend certain existing finger piers to accommodate larger boat tie ups. The project area is located within Salem Harbor(see Figure 1) and is used for the launching and mooring of recreational boats. The typical vessel size ranges from 20 to 36 feet, however some boat are up to 42 feet long. The recreational boating season typically lasts 26-weeks from May through October. The PCYC marina has been previously dredged in 1946, 1954 and 1980 with varying dredge footprints. The total potential Maintenance Dredge area is 288,840 square feet based on an amalgamation of the past three dredging projects as shown on Figures 2 and 3. The marina basin is approximately 203 115 square feet and the access channel consists of approximately 85,725 square feet. The proposed project consists of Maintenance Dredging approximately 25,000 cubic yards of sediment from a reduced footprint of 219,404 square feet of the existing boat basin and channel to -8 feet below mean low water(MLW). The proposed dredged material is anticipated to be suitable for ocean disposal pending approval from the US Army Corps of Engineers (ACE). A sampling plan issued by ACE is being implemented at this time. To date only the grain size analyses have been completed. Ten sediment samples were collected and analyzed for grain size distribution. Those samples are now being use in two 10-day bioassay tests to determine what additional analyses are necessary. The proposed"Reconfiguration Zone" includes the marina basin footprint and the Section I OA floats as shown on Figure 3. The"Request To Retain Unpermitted Structures" includes a number of minor deviations from the permitted structures; two sets of seasonal Section 10A floats and the addition of some currently unpermitted floats as detailed in Section D. The"Request to Extend Licensed Structures"includes increasing the number of piles by 10 to secure the I OA floats and increasing the length of 18 existing finger piers including twelve finger piers on Expansion Lane and six finger piers on the ocean side of Wall Street. Some of the club member's boats are in the 36-41 foot long range and the existing 20-foot finger piers make it difficult to securely tie up the larger boats. B. PROJECT BACKGROUND Dredging History The PCYC is located in Salem Harbor in the Salem Point Neighborhood adjacent to Shetland Properties Office Park. The PCYC originated in the early 1900's after the City of Salem had filled in the tide flats of Palmers Cove. A series of licenses to fill and build sea walls are on record with the Essex Registry of Deeds. The original PCYC was authorized under License#422 and consisted of a bulkhead, marine railway and pier. A record search of plans and licenses recorded at the Essex Country Registry of Deeds failed to locate License#422. The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MADEP) and Massachusetts Department of Public Works (MADPW) conducted a search of their own archives and could not locate a copy of that license. tThe first record of dredging is a 1946 plan approved by MADPW. MADPW contracted Bay State Dredging and Contracting (Bay State) for the 40,000 cubic yard dredge project. Copies of the 1946 permit and plan are presented in Attachment A. The marina was dredged a second time in 1954. MADPW again contracted Bay State for dredging 40,000 cubic yards. A copy of the MADPW contract is presented in Attachment A. The dredge plan has not been located,but the northern boundary and access channel of the licensed dredge area are shown on recorded License Plan 5447 prepared by Shetland Properties in 1968 when they wanted to fill a portion of Palmers Cove. A copy License Plan 5447 is presented in Attachment A. The marina and access channel were last dredged in 1981 when the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering (MADEQE) and the City of Salem were the applicants. Copies of the City of Salem's Order of Conditions, ACE Permit (MA-SALE-81-096) and the ACE "Finding of Facts" are presented in Attachment A. The _ Chapter 91 license for the 1980 dredge project has not been located at the Essex County Registry of Deeds or in the MADEP or MADPW archives. The approximate dimensions of previous three dredged areas based on the available plans are shown on Figure 2. The proposed Maintenance Dredging Area is shown on Figure 3. The proposed Maintenance Dredging Area is smaller than the area previously dredged because the access channel has been confined to the access channel dredged in 1980 only. Permits and Licenses for Structures The original Chapter 91 License Plan 422 has not been located at the Essex County Registry of Deeds or in the MADEP and/or MADPW archives. However, License Plan 422 is referenced and the structure is shown on License Plan 5447 in Attachment A. Chapter 91 License Plan 749 (4 Sheets), dated August 21, 1981, and License Plan 2559 (3 Sheets) dated February 15, 1991, authorized the configuration marina as it exists today with various alterations. The ACE issued Permit 88-1346-R-90, pursuant to Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 for the same project on November 27, 1990. The ACE permit corresponding to the 1981 Chapter 91 License was not located. Sources of Contamination An assessment of potential sources of contamination located in or adjacent to the project area has been performed. There are two-storm water outfalls located along the perimeter of the project area shown on Figures 2 and 3. The outfalls are connected to the City of Salem storm water sewer system and discharge directly into Salem Harbor. There is a boat washing station located on shore adjacent to the boat lift. The system is setup to re-circulate wash/rinse water which is stored in a tight tank. There are no gasoline filling pumps located at the marina and no engine maintenance services are provided. Available Bathymetric Information Steel Associates Marine Consultants, LLC performed a bathymetric survey of the proposed dredging area on July 13, 2015. This information has been used to establish existing conditions and estimate dredge quantities. The results of the bathymetric survey are shown on Figures 2, 3 and 4. Figure 4 show cross section of the proposed Maintenance Dredge Area. C. PROPOSED RECONFIGURATION ZONE AND REQUEST TO RETAIN UNPERMITTED STRUCTURES In 1981, all of the then existing structures including bulkheads,travel lift, boat ramp, deck,piers, floats and piles were permitted under Chapter 91 License 749. The recorded license and plans,presented in Attachment B, contain a detailed description of the permitted structures that was used to complete Table 1. In 1991, an expansion of the marina was permitted under Chapter 91 License 2559 and ACE Permit 1988-1346-R-90. The recorded License 2559 plans and ACE Permit 1988-1346-R-90,presented in Attachment B approximated the number of finger piers and piles to be installed. The existing structures are shown on Figure 2 and 3. In 1981, the marina piers included the Dinghy Tie Up, Main Street, Middle Street, Wall Street and Lookout Lane, the various end floats, bulkheads, travel lift, boat ramp, and deck all detailed in the written portion of the Chapter 91 License. The 1991 expansion included the extension of main piers known as Middle Street, Wall Street and Lookout Lane, the addition of a new main pier known as Expansion Lane, and a number of new piles and finger piers. In 1991,piles and a single finger pier were permitted as markers for two sets of floats that were permitted as seasonal Section l0A floats including Witch Way and the Breakwater. These floats, still permitted as Section 10A floats, are included is this proposed "Reconfiguration Zone and Request to Retain Unpermitted Structures." If licensed as piled held floats, additional piles will be sought to hold these floats in place. Table I presents a summary ofthe'permitted structure and the existing structure. The majority of the existing structures are as permitted with some minor alterations. The following is a summary of the structural changes. Existing Conditions An as-built of the existing marina is presented on Figures 2 and 3. Table I is a summary of the marina components comparing the as-built structure with the 1981 and 1991 licenses. The marina has seven main piers identified as Main Street, Party Lane, Middle Street, Wall Street, Lookout Lane, Expansion Lane and the Dinghy Tie-Up. The main piers are constructed of 75 floats including (59) 8x20' floats (12) 10x20' floats and (4) end floats of various sizes. There are 79 finger piers that vary in width from two to five =� feet and in length from 16 to 20 feet. Seventy-seven of the finger piers are permitted by Chapter 91 while the ACE permit only approximated the number of finger piers. The total permitted length of the main piers is 1,503.6 feet and the as-built length is 1,481. The total permitted area of main piers is 13,830 square feet and the as-built area is 13,765. The total permitted area of finger piers is 3,540 square feet and the as-built area is 3,544 including the two additional floats. The total permitted piles are 86 and there are 93 existing with a number in different locations. There are two gangways providing access to the piers, a travel lift with boat wash station and a bulkhead all of which are permitted. On the west side of the clubhouse is a public boat ramp. Boats are placed in winter storage in the parking lot surrounding the clubhouse. There are no fuel docks. In addition to the piles held floats and structures, there are two sets of l0A permitted mooring held floats identified as Witch Way and the Breakwater. The Salem Harbormaster issues annual permits for these seasonal floats. The Breakwater is secured with four mooring anchors and Witch Way is secured with six mooring anchors. Since 1991, two unpermitted piles have been added to serve as markers for the Section l0A floats on the Breakwater and Witch Way. The Section l0A floats include(14) 8x20', (4) 1500' and one 4x4' floats. These Section 10A floats are being included in the"Request To Retain Unpermitted Structures."Four of the six piles and one finger pier used to mark the float's seasonal positions were permitted in the 1990 ACE permit 88-1346-R-90 and the 1991 Chapter 91 License 2559. One additional pile has been added to the northwest end of Witch Way and one pile was added to the middle of the Breakwater. PCYC would like to permit the Section t OA floats as pile held floats and add several additional piles to keep them in place over winter months. The total area of Witch Way is 2,360 square feet not including the permitted finger pier, and the total area of Breakwater is 1,816 square feet including a 4x4' spacer float because the three piles are not in a perfectly straight line. Unpermitted structures include the"Dinghy Rack" east of the travel lift ramp consisting of(3) 8x20' floats and (1) 8x 16' float. These floats were added recently to accommodate dinghy's that are no longer able to "get out"because of siltation. PCYC would like to I include these floats in the"Request To Retain Unpermitted Structures." The total area of the Dinghy Rack is 608 square feet. ' Because of changes in what has been built compared to the permit plans,the PCYC is proposing to file an application with MADEP Chapter 91 and the Army for a "Request To Retain Unpermitted Structures" and establishment of a"Reconfiguration Zone" for the boat basin that allows for minor reconfiguration changes that occur when repairs are made to the piers,piles, floats and finger piers or when the structures are removed for dredging and then replaced. The proposed"Reconfiguration Zone" is shown on Figure 3 and includes all existing floats. Within that "Reconfiguration Zone" PCYC proposes to request authorization for up to 10 additional piles than are currently in place so that the l0A floats can be secured. PCYC also proposes to request authorization for up to three additional finger piers to accommodate changes in boat sizes as well as the potential to extend 18 finger piers up to 10 feet to accommodate longer boats. This would increase the total area of the finger piers by 510 square feet. D. PROPOSED MAINTENANCE DREDGE PROJECT The location of the project is shown on Figure 1 —Locus Map. Figure 2 shows the approximate extent of the three past dredge projects in 1946, 1954 and 1981. There are several overlaps in the previous dredge plan footprints and the access channel location has shifted during each event. Figure 3 shows the proposed "Maintenance Dredge Area and"Reconfiguration Zone." Figure 4 shows cross-sections of the proposed dredge project. Figure 5 shows shellfish habitat based on MASSGIS mapping. Figure 6 shows the intertidal areas above MLW and MLLW as requested by the Division of Marine Fisheries (DMF). DMF provided comments of the Notice of Intent filed with the Salem Conservation Commission. In response, the intertidal areas have been shown in detail on Figure 6 and on Figures 2 and 3. The proposed Maintenance Dredge Footprint has been reduced by 823 sq It to preserved intertidal area. The full response to DMF's comments is presented in Attachment C. The total potential area of the Maintenance Dredge Area is approximately 288,840 square feet. However, the actual proposed area to be dredged is 219,404. This is because the boat basin area has been reduced by 823 sq ft to preserve Coastal Beach in the intertidal area per DMF comments and because the channel area has been reduced by 68,525 sq ft to 17,2,00 sq ft to protect potential ell grass habitat, see Figure 3. The proposed volume to be dredged is 25,000 cubic yards. The proposed project area will be dredged to a depth of -8 feet below MLW in the basin and access channel. The entire proposed dredge area has previously been dredged by the MADEQE, City of Salem and MADPW and all proposed work is maintenance dredging. Dredging will only be conducted if ocean disposal is permitted. Dredging will be conducted by mechanical method using a barge-mounted excavator with an environmental bucket. Once excavated, dredge material will be loaded directly into a scow for transportation to an ocean disposal location. RESOURCE AREAS This is a water-dependent project that has been designed, and will be preformed, using the best available measures to minimize adverse impact on the resource areas defined under the Wetlands Protection Act. The project consists of routine maintenance dredging in previously authorized areas to previously authorized dimensions. According to the Massachusetts Wetlands Act, the entire project area is classified as Land Under Ocean (LUO). 1 l 1. LAND UNDER THE OCEAN (310 CMR 10.25) Land Under the Ocean is defined as "land extending from the mean low water line seaward to the boundary of the municipality's jurisdiction and includes land under estuaries. LUO,particularly the near-shore area, is presumed significant to the protection of marine fisheries, protection of wildlife habitat, storm damage prevention and floor control (3 10 CMR 10.25). According to 310 CMR 10.25(4), "maintenance dredging for navigation purposes affecting LUO shall be designed and carried out using the best available measures so as to minimize adverse effects on such interests caused by changes in marine productivity which will result from the suspension or transport of pollutants, increases in turbidity, the smothering of bottom organisms, the accumulation of pollutants by organisms, or the destruction of marine fisheries habitat or wildlife habitat. Projects not included in 310 CMR 10.25(3)which affect LUO shall, if water- dependent, be designed and constructed, using best available measures, so as to minimize adverse affects on marine fisheries habitat or wildlife habitat caused by(a) alterations in water circulation;(b) destruction of eelgrass (Zostera marina) or widgeon grass (Rupia marina)beds; (c) alterations in the distribution of sediment grain size; (d) changes in water quality, including but not limited to, other than natural fluctuations in the level of dissolved oxygen, temperature or turbidity, or the addition of pollutants; or(e) alterations of shallow submerged lands with high densities of polychaetes, mollusks, or macrophytic algae. According to 310 CMR 10.25(7)not withstanding the provisions of 310 CMR 10.25 (3) through (6),no projects shall be permitted which will have adverse effect on habitat sites of rare vertebrate or invertebrate species, as identified by procedures established under 310 CMR 10.37. The proposed project footprint is approximately 219,404 square feet of which of 217,112 sq ft are LUO in Salem Harbor. The proposed dredging area has a soft substrate that consists of very fine slit and sand. Grain size analysis of sediment samples has been conducted. Grain size and laboratory analysis of sediment samples indicate the greater than 90%of the sediment passes a 200 sieve. Copy of the grain size data is attached in Attachment D. Water circulation will be improved in the marina basin because of the proposed project and marine productivity will benefit by the increased circulation. There may �- be temporary,minimal turbidity and/or dissolved oxygen impacts caused during dredging activity. These are likely to subside quickly following work stoppage. Since dredging activity will not be conducted continuously, overall water quality should not be impacted. The entire project area has been dredged previously. The area is likely to contain opportunistic benthic species typical of other dredged areas. The area should recolonize with populations of organisms similar to currently existing ones rapidly following dredging activity. Data from the MADEP Wetlands Conservancy Program (WCP) indicates no occurrences of eelgrass (Zostera marina) or midgeon grass (Rupia maritina) in the r project area. Eelgrass has been mapped at the mouth of the access channel in 1995, 2010 and 2012. No dredging is proposed past 7+125 in the access channel, which puts the entire project greater than 250 feet away form previously mapped ell grass L beds, well outside of the 100-foot buffer zone recommended by DMF. After the project redesign, DMF has stated that they will not require an eelgrass survey because of the project's setback from mapped eelgrass and eelgrass habitat. There are no shallow submerged lands with high densities of polychaetes, mollusks, or macrophytic algae in the project area. According to National Heritage and Endangered Species Program data available through MAGIS, there are no specified habitat sites of rare vertebrate or invertebrate species in the project area or surrounding areas, as identified in the procedures established under 310 CMR 10.37 Adjacent shorelines consist of permitted seawalls. The structures were in existence during previous dredging events and were in no way impacted by dredging activity. Thus the proposed dredging activity is not likely to impact the structures or surrounding exposed shoreline. The proposed project will be performed after September 30 during the dormant fall and before February 15. The proposed project will take approximately four months to complete. Project activities are reoccurring based on high water thus will not likely significantly affect the resource area's ability to provide feeding, spawning or shelter areas to costal organisms, or to buffer the high-energy effect of storms. 2. COASTAL BEACH (310 CMR 10.27) A Coastal Beach is defined as an area of"unconsolidated sediment subject to wave, tidal and coastal storm action which forms the gently sloping shore of a body of salt water and includes tidal flats. Coastal Beach is present on two side of the proposed project(Shown in Figures 2 and 3). The project proposes to dredge 2,292 square feet of Coastal Beach above MLW. The areas of Coastal Beach are located in the �. northwest and southwest corners of the dredge footprint as shown on Figure 6. The northwest area has been reduced pursuant to DMF comments. The remainder of the northwest area requires dredging for safety because the floats ground at low tide and �. pitch strongly to the south. These floats can be a challenge to walk on at low tide especially when wet. The southwest area could not be reduced to preserve access to the slips behind the Main Street pier. All Costal Beaches proposed to be dredged are within the Maintenance Dredge footprint but have filled in since 1981. 3. LAND CONTAINING SHELLFISH (310 CMR 10.34) Land Containing Shellfish is defined as "land under the ocean, tidal flats, rocky intertidal shores, salt marshes and land under salt ponds when any such land contains shellfish." Land Containing Shellfish may exist within the intertidal and subtidal areas, which include LUO. Land Containing Shellfish shall be found significant when it has been determined and mapped as follows: by the Conservation Commission or the Department in consultation with DMF and based upon maps and designations of DMF; or by the Conservation Commission or the Department based on maps and written documentation of the shellfish constable or the Department. In making such identification and maps, the following factors shall be taken into account and documented: the density of shellfish, the size of the area and the historical and current importance of the area to recreational or commercial shellfishing. Currently,no maps exist which identify the project area as significant shellfish areas. DMF maps indicate that this area is and has been for many years closed to shellfishing due to high bacteria] contamination. Massachusetts Geographic Information System (MA GIS) data indicates that 19,154 square feet of the southern portion of the marina basin is suitable for Blue Mussell (Mytilus edulis). Small quantities of Blue Mussells were observed attached to the piles and floats. Since Blue Mussells usually attach to structures it is unlikely that they will be affected by dredging activities. All other MA GIS data does not indicate that the LUO actually contains any shellfish (See Figure 5). E. SEDIMENT SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS A sediment sampling and analyses plan has been provided by ACE. The first step of the ACE sampling plan has been implement. Ten sediment samples were collected and analyzed for grain size distribution. Data are presented in Attachment D. Those samples are now being use in two 10-day bioassay tests to determine what additional analyses are necessary. F. ALTERNATIVE ANALYIS Three alternatives have been considered for the project. The first alternative is "No Dredging"; the second it to dredge a larger area and deeper; and the third option is to dredge to -8 feet below MLW. No Dredge Alternative The "No Dredging"alternative is not considered a viable option because it would not improve access to the yacht club at minus tides. Larger and Deeper Alternative The larger and deeper alternative would consist of dredging a larger footprint or to a greater depth below MLW. This would provide easier access but would disturb a larger area and require additional permits. Therefore, it is not the preferred option. Minimal Alternative The "Minimal Alternative" is to dredge the channel and basin areas that would allow the existing boats to access the float at minus tides. This is the preferred option because it provides sufficient access and minimizes potential impacts to the resource area by both dredging activities and subsequent boat traffic. G. DREDGE MATERIAL DISPOSAL Dredge material generated during the past three dredging project at the PCYC have been suitable for ocean disposal. The proposed dredged material is anticipated to be suitable ed for ocean disposal pending approval from the ACE. However, the sampling plan has not been fully implemented at this time. H. PROPOSED MITIGATION The proposed project has been designed to minimize impacts to the surrounding environment to the greatest extent possible. Several mitigation measures have been proposed including Time of Year Restriction, reduction of dredge foot print,reduction in Coastal Beach footprint,replacing seasonal anchors with pile and others. The following is a list of the proposed mitigation measures. • The proposed project will take approximately four months to complete. Time of Year Restrictions will limit the dredge window to September 30 to February 15. • In the northwest comer where there is Coastal Beach,dredging to-8.0 will be limited to the first 16 feet off the float comer,and then using a 3:1 slope will reduce approximately 800 sf of intertidal conversion to subtidal. • The Dinghy Tie Up and Witch's Way that grounds at low tide. The proposed mitigation is to rotate the line of floats out five feet to ensure all floats remain at least 18"off the mudflat at any tide post-dredging. If this recommendation cannot be satisfied,the applicant will piles with float stops or skids to minimize grounding. • The only dredging proposed in the access channel is near the marina basin, at least 250 feet from the 1995 DEP eelgrass layer. It is highly unlikely that eelgrass exists in the marina basin or westernmost portion of the channel based on DEP maps and site assessments we have conducted nearby in the last several years. However,eelgrass does exist along the eastern portion of the channel based on a field visit in September 2013 for an adjacent project. DFM will not require an eelgrass survey if dredging will be limited to the westernmost portion of the channel. • DMF shellfish biologists have recently updated their review policy regarding the request for a shellfish survey. DMF has offered that the applicant can use historic survey data in lieu of , performing their own shellfish survey. If the applicant still wishes to conduct their own survey, results will be compared to historic data and the higher number will be used in the mitigation formula. • If the applicant will pay DMF to perform the mitigation seeding as part of ongoing enhancement work. Seeding will not occur in Salem Harbor or any other mudflats currently closed to shellfishing for public safety concerns. Rather, the nearest conditionally restricted or open flat should be used(i.e. in-kind but out-of-place). Out-of-kind mitigation will be considered on a case by case basis. • The above mitigation is for the loss of the shellfish resource only. To mitigate for loss of habitat, this project may be suitable for the In Lieu Fee program for any intertidal areas above MLW converted to subtidal. This component of mitigation will be addressed in the Army Corps permitting process. I. PERMITING ' Permits required for the project include obtaining an Order of Conditions from the Conservation Commission, a Chapter 91 Permit from the MADEP, a 401 Water Quality Certification, filing a Environmental Notification Form and an ACE permit. PCYC filed a Notice of Intent with the Salem Conservation Commission in November 2015. Two hearings were held and the Commission issued an Order of Conditions on January 28, 2016. A copy of the Order of Conditions is presented in Attachment E. Research of previous dredging project permits indicates that an Environmental Impact Report has not been required in the past. J. CONCLUSIONS The PCYC is proposing a maintenance dredging project for an area within Salem Harbor. The project will provide safer navigation into and out of the PCYC marina during low water, reducing the risk of grounding and potential releases to the environment. The project has been designed to reduce any adverse impact to the surrounding environmental resources to the greatest extent feasible. The project consists of maintenance dredging approximately 25,000 cubic yards from a preexisting channel and basin to -8 feet below MLW. The project area is 1,375 feet long and ranges in width from 100 to 450 feet. The proposed project will impact approximately 217,112 sq ft of LUO in Salem Harbor and 2,292 sq ft of previously dredged Coastal Beach. The proposed dredged material is anticipated to be suitable d for ocean disposal pending approval from the ACE. The project area has been dredged previously on three occasions. Previous dredging activity was used to establish the ' dimensions of the project area. Due to the fact that the area has been dredged on three previous occasions, dredging activity will not likely seriously affect biologic activity in the project area. r r FIGURES i f r r T_ c C A m m r r ut ,+Yz t'!-. r>W vhs�*.a,rrnvtr�€a m `a �, "' ..--�--•� t �. t- ,.. ' q�S �� ..a.. ,.�V.. _ A � w T� �, m � iy � °' •�•��,bWa' f,�`. `_"�,.."'�, `�S � �° �+ BJP t� -I� � • �.O �♦�� tl�. �� t +n� � Q V 119 .H 3 11 fl '.�'•t�,....±P �"�•I ,d m� �! tly. az.� uY � a � 't� -., vd b .. �`-. ' •m m. .` g s d4 a sS ±�^ ... �•, �AxvM r x A yf,_ i n�� '' gj .^"� 'u� Rq•.O_ '14,, `'`� 'mr. k } f.. 0� �Zd pp ^irt '\Y-. "` fir.*SZ�:e�j �'� r��e. �: �� '� ^`f,"♦,_ ^ ,y'M`;.� `,'t • i�i wry � t, �S � �% �� Y +�* :� zym �f Y Q♦ P .. Q m J� 6 ':` � 1 i •4 r ice'* t�np • ":r ". ae„ �� .o �.a.. �^^tiT'i*'�m--O�t"` yi.F'M1-. v-m�..t=`fa 1wy�e s;.tt'n!.j.."Yu.-it�b.,«z a mc�+," w m••.,� 'Y r. R i�{✓°,v- .'•• t ,uz2"_ rdtgt��6 7 F't-:-.e♦ .�`1u $'i�mSw4y .„ "C4, r . �;`"' r4J'r � L� cCe.' c 4E :,ta * y,h4a.Cxie:I♦: r+� ATV; T " i t ; ' �<3; r. _F � u+d _ vs ry.� '�� ,Y Y� X �. �.1�'� `^ � l� `' y..:•i� x. ' � .y..... 0 0. � ,: • .�iq,� � " � o"` �-: �r��w''-� %j� �U�� '�.b3+�r � QP � ~ .e. .. ref.. �.;w. fA�SA,rS�4 A.. 'YL�:�� Q � n`sn V •r � y,&'�' � ,i. ' s r., '"t 6 � :, x. L f .�•. .` y�' a fi tl a.� {}°�7�j ,7... w } "" �, .W,� y� m }*. -. R� �~ » .:.{j -.Z� 1 � �hc.'•s � ^y ��; ♦♦�+"-1t .J y ! � �.�'� ` �ti.�O � � }�w��• �� Y'1+ � }LyM .'� � � � ql...k91 O .0 ''Ta! b��y . . !i' # R4Y,:rm4+�J 1. , s _ ��` � ,, �- "� ,•�' a� ^. h , ... �y p!kb. -rx a7 ♦A' '*� ,+'; SEs" ,p h' 11>{iQj �? t 1 . �s:.1 �s ^�� Y 1 >� . •[J,> �-�: •f+ .� �• �,��.3 �{. ��'� + 1� Q '�.� .aP ' � : » � .��,�, ",.,a ��W b -�, s' tf4.".x r,' `o ';` im ^+Fs''• >� r" ,fqq/ , w' a ,� Io n k' ��e��:Ta f u. II. 3 { `• f t R' #(\ �++� u-e+r.. ♦ r. .,t1p y S/� ^V iy ^ 'E�`, [[ • «`.��o`' `.'Ri. ..c., lA "t a 1vN,V� 'S+r� +1' � `�,j v �. y N . ,-17.r♦ G � �� e �`°'dl , r:wr� JS � ,� �msGR PV � Z y �i y ' +Q,, � tf' ! D�y-LL - �• ♦s ` �ay{{;� tf�wt�S. t `"�L �.} #.1. � � '.. '�✓ St€Rrr,M1rx pr i3 stn iY l' cs sr ry4 h" Mtjy, ,../+.�. .i♦s rww:.*'•. '.CAi.« j', ..�! ..}Y....�}� y'e`y^;.yy • j t r °'�/�`.w '' ��'t•?� d >"`.... �..'�Fe'_�gt v{ At,,��r A`+�„t. _ 7 _ ...-�o_ {)� •T i•r tf�J« .r� ,.�.w_�+- j`3 . *G+ 4 � '�` •� .I -.,y.a s ('•%�qF� }(Q •••i x �`� • a'°I�ya.,Lts , .,:ud t x X\ s ra 111 '� tai•.` +" 'f /.kr � j` 1 1• ' �' S �� i .1 � ( '� a t� ti: ^p_,w. ,.. r ♦; y:'}^r� RJ �'2 .-1 3 ;�� m>� rm ° IP ^.. -}},L•'3aet3�` 1 . IF •, Rte• + y' m ##F t •.+St. *♦ yW �.Y Y ] MP$yIJM1 If 6 �..f '...` ° ,r aQi�. m "/"y`�" a �� Yy ` �M �K p a t',',r n� �� R -•4 :" w } (+' ,+.. /*'9✓�ep2gy t ,,• ' � ' •yb d ,�'} �� e�, `. . ^�r t�'t �git� •ti�• mrYi � 4N},�t ,CS ,= /. 7`' R /f.agq�.l P� � r-+. ({+�' �� t , �r• ,_, .� *CSP b'S '+ f!*�c� � 1�; -61 it C+ it�� '� 3" k1 .. t'p-� '" •.e �. f � i �", h p N�O7 - .mi� 1a �,• ',N S r wq�1�«_.� r x3±M -y 1 t� � f: r�y � �$ +;� l.9tiS� O.o. j ,m�'1. ., ?� � 2r.J231 r- � a t Q '1 I;•V�+ v `"`� �a, f. ��:i�� 04 ��.,�yd[� �'` ''�a. '� '�o�' �t� � „a r.) .,��A s,�... "� , ' �` .0 "} ,✓ r' h t ♦°.'• � f ..✓}� �� '� +. � �_ ON s�.d 1�� , a � �:. �� R r eie c 2 q '� k1;1�„ .� .� S ...a a •i? • • - 1 •-. r 2 G'il X `o w� py,,a. 9 • .°° .t e�..a eM. •rte 1' . [� 1 s1 � ti•.bw 9� ofJ I _ �+ r '� m ' • gk } ~ls � } ; � / R S s� a. 1 ...�-�a� �`^^ �' j::y� y}� �C ✓ -i11%0`.,. I-'+�r`\u_.J g �I int • as VIU ya ^'S4 • f •t'n O,Y ']aK t� ,•. .tom . '; j a: �" ,*'� '^+,. 1 � 1�4• _ _.« �-_^ _ �lspN,V H9iW �.))laaa'!! � _ '`, i,":+`�2 '[f40..� b' ro � ;'.' i 2'� •.r. v '• `Q 1.. ��' `� a 1': ", N `t. �` �� l„ 4/2= — _ � +Yi 1C �1 i ��_I � y��`'fy`Yi M>.; yr` ^f : 4� .,r+'.'.� } a ? t� +. � m -�+ r� a 1 V W /- 1! t%: 3 S Z ✓ r.r� -W `•Ra ,� Gam se.+. aLry i a 'E�N 1 1F fi _ ��.`C��: r d . .. + ,� ♦•. a. . s . R: #�C> N,. `,•Y^' _ *Y � ,; o t`.S S ��V.SYW mLL�k � T \S i � W.'�y�41. S._ �� J.+' d� a •A �''� � t ' �.«r ° � .-. < ♦ � �,A[�7.. tt ,,�o W ` ttt'` 4 5e » } -yw•=• `R j,�i. �k 3£ VV } Y iir j 4. it f� 'rS 1 ii! ,m«-v .-r p� rm M*+.- "Y�- �}tt-, Iii" t ti:. �},:,p '. ?' *}r.,•+ ,+: ,` ..� �a 49 ��i�". � � l': ...... 1�"►".,1 AVC r•' d �" ngwF�r'.`T�• s<�-��i'"\i•+�, L-R! z�.�1*'J ..�. •. ! .jam{ �•�3:`.` ♦.1 °M L-E-G-E N D �PROPEfl TY L/NE eunmxt SWNpNL -EASEMENT 1906 APPFOY LIMIT OF ORE NC 1954 APWOZ LIMIT Of OflEOfiNG 79.APPROVED LIMIT Of OREOCJNc -SGS-- ."'L 1LN BUOY -MEAN LOW WATER APPFOX LOCAPCNS Of SIRUCNRES IGF (yF I • / e SHOVM QV 1990 OR 1991 CH, 91 SC r`�y I V PERMIT NOi INSTALI£1 / SMUCNTA RES INSLLED NOT S40NN l ay Ihm n o 6 I I n dJ 1980 OR 1991 fH"91 PEflMIi J n = pEFMITIfD Al TOA SEASONAL£COATS L_ .wErzANiuo musr y FICHr WAr gppuFTENANT ro __ RCBERr d(Avpw. ry N THE SVB$'T PAgCEL OESG9/BED IN LEW 9COY Mm4.PACE JIa LEAVLTT STREET n -TFECLRBfL N/E N. ° REbslE'i a n ✓CNN q.&A E C N/F C� LOT B S j H LINGER SrE1{ LL CAS£SJ19B LO]BI KLLN M RECORD AflEA LL CASE SJI99 m e J_ , WJCb J9911S LOT>J / I ^a PIAN BN DI 4` B „I CoIT COM1C ONWl z z mxcN " ee PGN 3 C AYFNEN]j til f i ie MUNCNK/N REALTY RECCRO AflEq�Y. T% sTORALE� J Y'= s/t5/16 4 ]flUSr \95S1A ,b w�R A.L/NGER ]F \BO ] 'g�I�' ON£E( i N/l ¢` _ /,e f S OKO% YCTM B-9 t G 'FAA 1: STOR.{J SHE2ANp IRVST o Y '� 1 9.r ROBERT/.LAPPIN ]R Q W NOW N% APPROXIMA2I/Mlr Cf 1990 f f9 S-d 3 p� ;N SHERANO rlll. R09ERTLAPpiN ]R OREOCN6 ip 80 BELOW MLI PER O'IE$RApY fMSFNC /I c�T" W u NS -fJ m �{ A e I L s/ ADD NLLW YxE k xOIE ✓ NNX PAq' CI 9OAT 1�. W W OEPARM£NT C£THE ARMY PERMIT S. e Y}5 I.a ftl 110 W/S'B(OC FSTOR CE� JO'MAIN RPE gOAI GATE @6 'I p/C PAB gNCV RACY OISTAIARLE INV-]9S - a IX- NOW OR fcpgflxNcEwRLY `BOA ° J id a dB °A zSlHa' RM CTIA�CWVRW IP�I/H CfANNEL BU�OYST +' :eye rty ee1 'e NO OBb RevisCiBosns BPfOpNCrryCALJeA'WOE wRnMAre 46 OOdN6 ti an 3 _ - 1)jj a K� 1 1 � =?yL \ d a"uegw rvPE ��I= LW. `I cs M ( OENER<L NOTES: ascHA.eGE .V--2.A4�C 1 A A {' I s v 4 6g 11 .� _ _ vxmBxwrxnlwnvrl,meMcoudmwwxmnnrunm mr ��v I 1p VI I y t- ! fvv �� - e < -s �'�� eE�m�iT.�wmcDmRl mvrmx5vwrwcoxwnriuxDlurx9. ' w LL, .w mR W aTA wS QM� GGlowriffin \ �` ; ` 5. AxmwEurowouaw¢swuwA nlOa mlwuAmww[vvuRncrS En ineen*n y,11 \- ,\�-� t54 Q„AA e' vsrtlawwmmWnwrs mxacmlzAwadxxavomvaam4wx A• LLC 9 DAVAcawvlwxumm«esww T e'ti a d ORILLHOIEAJ e�'A4`a \ \ f• 4 'dam° ASOYMw'E96RLYD CMRWyrYXGIOUMIIPoLA6'I BYILLRRfA1E 495 C260L SYRP(Tntl FIMT sE£GENERAL N01£(6 " A "_', / \ /L F I YdgT LLIRIMY 6fE0MT¢l6WWML MECOCPNWrtTErtYRME % sum se *e ee f ern lYCYYlETSan2NIMEa0.WIMlElYl9{NNR xb WupR.m Beverly MA 01915 / A twunmG TOL W&99-5111 ilk I u mertvr awnwvrt'Sdswcum �cwswrAmauc oww Fax.9)B 927--6103 n 1 ! a"^� �+ � e` wuxmm+carl�wwsYi�wmlMldurouowmrm monwuer °' ai a` `,e ,per ✓ as a /�� wxmNxAssouAlaLoumeofluxoRmemw5wvA5au15 aaA � • > ,. r M\ :ys��j ' a t �_ wuNwAgeIS AwAIwmSw.leD,nr PALMER COVE savenae,mvu .vSwISSnMnnruerwwosmxdaeweovmuR„s YACHT CLUB. INC ® 3 \ ,a ar� w.wlrwrn-AmEmeve•vlwrerwsARrSrsxTcrcmlroWMrraauulY 74 LEAVITT STREET np \ �� f SxvwuNw maSroxoEwArawanwlm gavrm SALEM, MA y�I \ � L 4 4V” 4 ! t �e �T[ �p�' 6NVI Dr IWIDPFMdG WASlWIDtliK'NAXAttDWAIMY4lETIpM6 d6A v �� 1. �"L 1 I ' vmuxD wroxmasrowxswusulrwewu.uro lurFsanruwm! 1a„�a _ f r + �.• wAras DisuaxAReawerwRamdvRSroruxarwlwy. PALMERS COVE EXISTING zwworlvwavEaLvc wuuAMnmwmbrosaaAEwwc lMMua SALEM 1LARBOR m\rrw'erwARrvexrnvwcew sai5usx-pwaxrcwAruwdr5 BATHYMETRIC REi ENLE Is NAGE rO WiF➢OSNBERRR e\a0 LAN'AGE DE A PLRMANENT CONDITIONS 1s EA sf 'DESCRIBED IN a19E flel'dlMMnwRLMGF'd'pY rll[ppXCl nwMiwnlaxmwlW DEW I,PALE 212 EIEVAiT'I........ IIEYAW£CII6WWINIXIS BEEN GRAPHIC SCALE BOOR'.1ANO XPIL1£O ON PUN ElNY1FRNBE0.1YRR9WAMMI rI¢YLW WTp W'mMiMIWP6➢EW6 RPALE WTI pEEO BCOA gpQcrdi MS ME SGam' e 86$PA )BB• 1,. b lllmndrluxormeeuunmalrgwREucrmorr rrlwEs,rmgrsR 'm'Rm' FIGURE t w rm 1 ':f,+ SLOIABIEPoRHMewnRe[egryrlYDTNS Mee 11.1.AN. 2 . IW'M SGN0umE5d alnEl/fbuerrmvlFYINOBW RTA IIRV MIRIB. D➢(C:11/23/15 t CHAcRANrvEr�A 1 AcrFssw 7,2W Ngt`L ` a' aRE 13UO3y PRSN<flFI\\\\\\ HISTORIC MAINTENANCE DREDGE AREA t �y 2y 1"=120' o a J I o n _J z c I $NERI I r111, m RIC NT Cf WAY g 1 D 2NAN)Tp _ RpRERJ I LAPv/N. suarcr vARCEL OEsIAI /N 1;A 11777 y BEm eooK rima,PAGE a6 STRFET y Z He T RELQgBEB JUNN AN/G Na] d. REGSRFEU LANG w ? UNLER A",L 5 LC C%,B-2 52gR LL, e' ' NEN SI(M R£c0.90 £ 5J2EB r1 LOT B F LI .'� /Y'V✓d' 5' f .iy L N 9M 2]2 T C Rl. GONG N/C MA ] i 2 CMJC 1 / „I PAI�W[NT� !P N NUNCHKLN REAL rY 'fl£L0.POY REA-�l'e'flA v££NT `BOT R TRVS) \9522 5E ,V /^ STgq CE l S E N A LINGER TR \6oAT 'u Ci OREOGE GEl s)avH'A � sNEnnrvU must of / sl . { e meq- d NpooU I RURERrI 1A1111 Y./ 1 "O H W 41 e6' SNERANA L oNF ST(MY EATS]!NG " k' RCBERr Pv/// /flp ) e I ,,/5hs NOKO x $ECTON B B uREwz NNtt 9oED BOAT _ REV GR.P, W/E BLUC ESTaep GE, JO oRAIN PIPF W/ CA ' Y y . ^u ,e ' FWmPoHT by. I W[PAo U C "Y oISCNARLE INW-2.92 } v BUgT WASy 3-8 10 b �. �T J 3 a NO oe1B Ceauiplia'I NOW qp FpFMEFL �0 > INBE I 3 fi 1 ( d r " �' Revisions GTY OF spLEM Rq NP, GANG✓( © A 1 CHANNEL BUO fp �. 1 0 s xrOE ` 11w11 ly cANGWArJy �+" Yr��J�.s�.r� r '^ _— o � �9 y/4 > q s ✓ � p6g I� "/ ,f �Y"! -.� . ® y4 n Ly 9 e'dv o 2 dp S iF f S I-!3 {\ lz 1e'DIA.PPE L la- > 91 ry N I OrscRARGE mv=-2G� � 0 51 �. I � ,x s vI b T 'xE O n < 22 Griffin f r _ ' .I Engeenng 4 v A 4� a n �ry�• 9 ® `,r Group,mLLC sEE cENExat HOTwE � \1!qa� \ 7,. t'� \ P ? i Ba Cyy' 0913M Flow z, IIy.MA 01815 o Al an e / ` Ir v\ t S� A' `r rel:e�easTsm Tex:9]&93)-Sto3 2�iv 1 S � e°T+ "�1 v aaCvW t E PROPOSE0 2015 uuNm.ANCE me£orx L.Li.C.g./y.p t+,j\ a < \ nz '' r FLwmRINr(2r9,36es sl PALMER COVE \ti J --0 PROPERTY urvE YACHT CLUB, INC avt Ti - � 8 _ —'T ® str .�I y�„b ;.' r xJ _—Bw+ R 74 LEAVITT STREET 61, SALEM, MA E - •�rAl wRAntN sourvinNG ZLW£ -EASEMENT C oE5 c ANNEL 6VUY -- PROPOSED MEAN LOW WA1ER PROP.MawrzNp"c£DRmc£EoomRiNr MAINTENANCE ALMFR'S COVE SALEM HARBOR DREDGE FOOTPRINT GRAPHIC SCALE NON. P MLLW3�\ 9/ELlFS4 c- je y F e SUlTA91U1T AREA REf£RENLE IS MAGE TO Will,MUSSEL) $G�.I•- ' t/IE.qe.` LANGUAGE CTAPEflMAN£NJ FIGURE ..nw I ��e,o USE EASEMENT 0£SLRI6EL1/N `LKI GEED BOOK 2JJ91.PAGE 2J2 Ally Ally DEPICTED oN PLAN BEY®i RELORDEo 5,PAACEGE DIXN: 6665. L QOI611/33/IS 1 iRCpOAD T015 10 �MapgWplE�NI_NC£OR£JG£LIYIi �ONEDpNG 11RER Gl/S$ UYIT FR6b4D 1015 19O5f WALL COgIWT EXPANSION YA44 JENANC£OFmrI1UtlT 4 ._. G NE LANE _. _. W 2 —T LIB MARINE eASW ACCESS MANNEi 19 6 W a uREIXM'G _ _MEAN_OW_WAIER _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ MEAN LOW WATER _ ... TTT La 2 _ \ .... _.... fLMOALS r __ _ _. .... 4 A BELOW ro d0 -� �/-EXSPx„,wOE \ BELOW YEM'LOW ... 11 \� WA]£R -6 ACS 1 -10 ' 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 8+00 9+00 10+00 11+00 10 SECTION A—A -- ' Scale: Horizontal 1"=40' - Vertical - 1 = 4' access wnxxEL 6 _.._. ..__ ._: ...._. _.... 4 ...._ - 2 P Lo _- _ _ 0 LL ensAe R - Lv x s9cnoN B B La ..._ ...._ ..._ -2 E_ �£snN6 GR.tGE -_ a LYAa sEponoxs n A y OPES ro -4 La ' NO Gale OBaclpimn _6 Revisions r GRAPHIC SCALE n a rn r m -ID IFT 1 I I w ¢ l 12+a0 13+00 14+00 14+75 ' GAML.D1015 pR0.W MIS 10 10 MINTENANCE PP£OfI IIMIT MAAV IENA�NCE AM.UMIT 10 66W' ILMI} LI-Mli M -I 6 ARFROX..[IMITt� GI"iffin ]9K ORN(YNG OREOfJN6 a, a GLA4o ae OREOGING Bv00 nLe(rrP) -' En Engineering 6 6 I UYI9rw. 6 Grog. LLC 9 W 2 �baw� Z ... avExalNl__ 4 P AroMX.UMn O• UMrz - .. ... ILYn ... - 495 Ca0a S'NeeL 2nd Fbar F 1951 ORIEQA l )9pO MIOOLE PARTY W DINGY 2 LL BBVBIIY Ir1A 01915 pREOpNL STREET LANE 1916 RE 1i _MEAN LOW Wn1ER 1` NEnN Law=AiER OR£�NG Tel.9789274011 0 _.— O _ �.—.— —._ _ _ —.—.—. —.—._.�-y- 0` F.978-917-5103 On r.. i L€J i �eoisum¢Paw2 ._ nnNc Ew ._ -p2 art aaATE PALMER COVE 4 ORE}NS TO as O.- e0 r Aa^c I 4 � YACHT CLUB, INC Snow uEw mw xl AwE MO.YEAY mW I 74 LEAVITT STREET _6 ._ WATER �.. i -I -6 SALEM. MA I 1 11 \ _.. .... gt I ^ :.enOC a ry n m m m m in 0 0 0 CROSS-SECTIONS I I I I I I i I 1 i 1 0+00 1�+00 2+00 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 SG910:1,_a,SECTION B—B — ACCESS CHANNEL SECTION C—C — MARINA BASIN FIGURE Scale: Horizontal - 1"=40' Scale: Horizontal - 1"=40' gy®s 4 Vertical - Y' = 4' Vertical - 1” = 4' 61tc 11/23/15 C J ,.r'j i�a ` tis *-•.+ + _ r %; - ■�— � � 1 �I 4, u.7 i4N •Y- 4 ■ p.w1. k H ( ,•' TP RM GRAPHIC SCAJ� AA 1F- '1`A P t, `" + y G�• � �,y��; 1�` ,'� ��G+4rs e�m w;aa w! "�A° �E .M+sk+o1'�a'."a r(� ■�- �yam. 6 �lrt��E4a iu Y.e vn« .a.tt� ra f v.'+s..akz , �� F.ma _ ■�� -ppiI CIA, PALMER COVE YACHT CLUB, INC r e i ' a ,- r . ., 1 1 1 N W CORNER 1 11 826 SF N W CORNER 2, 219 SF . 1 1 1 1 V44 CORNER 1 66 SF SW CORNER 1 645 SF 1 1 1 1 AREA ABOVE ML W WAN AREA A B O VE ML L W W llU DREDGE L I MI T DREDGE L IMI T 1 2, 292 + SF 2, 864-± , SF 1 1 .� Go m L t `� ,,� �. �� l 1 TABLES TABLE 1 EXISTING STRUCTURE SUMMARY Palmers Cove Yacht Club Salem,MA Location Main Piers Piles Finger Piers Permitted Exisking Permitted Existing Permitted Ezisiting Floats Pier Floats Pier �- Number Width length length Area Number Width Length Length Area Number Number Number Width Length Area Number Width Length Area Dingy❑eup 7 8 20 140 1120 7 8 20 141 1128 0 2 0 0 Float at Ramp 1 27.7 14.6 14.6 404.42 3 8 20 20 480 Total Length/Area 154.6 1524.42 161 1608 Main Street 12 SO 20 247 2470 12 10 20 242 2420 13 6 14 2X20 560 13 2X16 416 Float at Ramp 1 28 15 15 420 1 32 15 15 480 f Total Len h/Area 262 2890 257 29M 6 2X16 192 Party lane 8 8 20 162.5 13M 8 8 20 162 1296 12 15 11 2x20 440 5 2x20 200 Float at End 1 325 14.5 145 47125 1 33 15 15 495 1 1 1 5x20 100 1 5x20 100 Total Length/Are. 1n 1A3.25 177 1791 Middle Street 15 8 20 320 2560 15 8 20 302 2416 17 16 SO 2X20 400 9 2X20 360 Float at End 1 34 14 14 476 1 35 14 14 490 1 4x20 80 Total Len h/Area 334 W36 316 29M Wall Street 9 8 20 190 1520 9 8 20 1 184 1 1472 11 12 14 2x20 560 3 2x16 96 10 2x20 400 2 5X20 200 2 5X20 200 Lookout lane 10 8 20 203 1624 10 8 20 203 1624 18 21 12 2X20 480 12 2X20 480 2 2x20 80 2 5X20 200 1 5X20 100 1 4x20 80 Expansion Lane 8 8 8 183 1460 8 8 20 183 14M 11 15 11 2X20 440 6 2X20 240 r� 2 5X20 200 4 3X20 240 Witch Way 2 3 1 8X20 160 1 4X20 80 Break Water 2 3 ' Number Length Area Number dUnlh AreaNumber Number Number Area Number Area Totals )3 1503.6 13829.7 75 13765 86 93 )) 3540 79 3544 Section SOA Mooring Held Floats Appling for License as Pile Held Floats Section SOA Permitted Ezisiting Permitted Existing Section LOA Permitted Exisiting Floats Pier Floats Pier Piles permitted ands Ch 91 Number Witl[M1 length Length Area Number Width Length length Area Number Number Number Length Area Number LengthLeArea Witch Way14 "8 20 280 2240 14 8 20 280 2200 2 3 1 8 15 15 120 ' 1 8' 15 15 320 Total length 295 2360 295 2360 ate. °Break Water 4^ 15 20 120 58M 4 '35 20 320' MIND 2 3 I 4X4 '16 ' -1 4X4 `16' J� Total 415 41W 415 4160 4 16 4 1 16 Unpermitted Floats Appling for License as Pile Held Floats Dingy Rack 3 820 Ib IIB 60 180 Piles Shared with No Finger Pip 1 8 16 Dinghy Te up Total 76 We Permitted as LOA floats lUnpermitted Structures Existing Pier Lengths include spacing between floats and committal differences in float lengths. Pier Areas based on total length not size of floats 1 1 1 1 D n m 3 m z D 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ATTACHMENT A yf� IJ 1 1 �1 �1 W 1 ' 1 1�� Iii ��s ` : r w ��tl'�1� K . )oak J=i! VV \VQX)i7 tZM/M6.4.3. wr (0 , a `4 Z. cc kc Ili tr ""...�'�'+!., a... .�. _. _� ... .. - — ...-.. +a-� gym_ .—�—... .._. .--.-..._...- •"—. �. .,_......... r41 0_nZ�.. t The work As be done ISO the dredging of"a' channel' and IlkS :c basin'in Salem Harbor`at`Pelmer's• Cove' The channel - • is to be 60-feet'wide on the bottom"ind the basi is to' be' of the. dimensions; on the bottom, as shown s t i " on the plan: The channel is to bs dredged`t a depth $ a .,' t of,six' (6). feet at mean'low waterend the basin is to, ' be,dredged'to a deptki of eight`'(8)°Peet'at mean low i water: a s 4, U " Supplementing the• Standard Specifications for Waterways Work dated May 1941,,, those Special Provisions shallapply 1 to this work,a . ` The general location and dimensions of the ar a• to,be. dredged are shown .in •detail on 'a plan on file .in the office o� the Department of Publio ' Works'' 100 Nashua Street, Boston, Dlasa., marked " x 11Prop4ded Dredging, Palmers Ceve, Salem. ' s Departinent of Public Works of Massachusetts Diviaion of Waterways, October 1946, *' Scale 1:1000, Ace• 02559 " ' = Said plan is- referred'to and made's part of tAess specific'etione, The area 1s to be dredged so that shall have throughout upon completion 6f the work the depth specified ober r x whole extent as shown on the plan] with the banks at the sides slopeht@t an angle not flatter than 1 on 3i No payment will be made for material dredged outside the specified limits, as shown by soundings,. unless the same is spa- eifically ordered in writing by the Engineer before the exeavation .is madei• 't,;5. No. 596' , x , • , .,flln- the 7B ,• p:,taf the,W lThe emou in doing the work the Contractor shall make the bottom of the exi evg lYaTae, ac � tion as smooth and level ail -possible at or slightly below theMtlane °dfY1 required depth, but no payment will be made for any material dredged prom t more than one foot. below the required depth as deie nerennd from information obtained by surveys made under the direction of the En" ;'`hen ' T .upon the completion. of all the work covered b this contract except then in win whefijthe4quantityloffmnt9rial'axe avated ,is-tto bejdetermined by measui' ;in irnRsitu�,#tlie sounainga,made for thaOxerious a stimatesland' the removel.,'6t,� r"eaaept _„ shoelssshall,�be;.conclusive and',de ductionslfor ,overdepth or,material ez4ape e " the vnl outside,thetapecifien limits will-Tbejbased upontthe :result of these sound ,Thep All �bouldersll cubic y"ardorrlessin �volttme;, which may be found iti;yp ye far th materitjlaytogbetexoavate�l,taro toibe„romoved as a part of this oontraet,pgd Ifro Itemkldnll�bouluers}.ina�excesaof 1 cubio yardhand not over 5 cubio yarge `anount - k in volume, which can be excavated by the dredgo',anddeposited in the scow; :T'�np � ,, the usual dumping operation, ars also to be paid for under Item 1, but;lip in' additional work other than the regular dumping operation is required tord y to 4-v, them after they are raised by tho bucket, they are to be paid for under' out int s'Item ,2-o rel ' .�t t Tis;e.y - b'x ss�,teac e r a u ,,, die Engin ttrqu tilf.aany.�ledges:areifbund withiaffhe ere'vto bel"dredged, all material; to the covering them is to be dredged away and the`ledgesTleft bare. Boulders ink `""ae excess of 5 cubic yards• n volume will be considered as ledge. x 'tne atlon as Each *# tacrnm n' •�' �` .& The excavated material shall be dumped at sea east of a °tt straight line ,joining Halfway Rock Beacon end Middle Breakers . Spindle and southerly of Halfway Rock Beacon, in not less then t. 12 fathoms of water over the deposited material at mean low *MR lacess aa at, such l t�y�i1©�='Engineer, 1'orPsfio08fher'�dNpoa3'tionsma'y�ibe-may made'4ofisthekt� O r inaterial•or any port IHTO-f'i!t-,;agfahaj& bo7ap roved, by:.the- De= 444.;,,t5,a .r � partment, t iu+Mq y i � ? •.,. , t ^ � S+t.�..wf/4�tr~ O -111A p4l4YWC('4Y A'+vyF 1{eWis�iF.yhl�d}'a�kSgX M $3 Dtzd'e}*, h cl ev) x xy. , t 0% Or,*, Oro, � �,+ "vim v'3-$C •g ." 4 1d+ ,.t ..'. ' S*zu V41 a t.".`a• "..1V [moi (4,i;."'.,r'S}`3D":' Rse '�tk � 1§ .!& �''J�"Y.AI��`;»� UP,.�'•''".$ P:t�� tiSf t12S. ":.� t e'? f:��C) t�.".'.�'.,, 4i x£T� t:'7 �d+x..1� i:r' �`+ ,,.x�",..:9 [,'�t�W ° t.:,. ,Vq c"" n4 1Yp A At-> C,:, al toil y51t.1 @4 RI d3 C3a , ja C .el ,sL3 �: ^":t . tS g, 11 1*t--<y46 t0 V , 65920 DOp 9£6 ON 10VN1N00 ,•, A_2ww,, *1 .ion Im '"'.rn-1p tmzz3' 000i l 3itl03 a, may,: 7.1 ...,..a;" ,... s " -�,' �..ctoy 1s s3 :t" �, aww�' Cit e ' C SAVMH31VM 30 "ISIAIO 5 133NHOpSSVW 30 SXUOM 0090d 30 1N3MHVd30 �, qa 5„ fy_ g d` 4 NIStlB 3H1 NI n ' 3AOO S83AAW 030O3dO 30 01 036 NI NMOHS V36V ONI00390 0390dOHd o g4t..': S ri tt ' •+'trS/ !f I yy �� i i $ . i f+::.Y e wP� [ T . r'.P N.'W •}y. 0. ^ "-+ 9 W Ai, 6 2{ �p {i q�,,y� N d�. jv" �`T%"r •^ .�+.�..:,`',' `/9.�`1b.: "iRi¢6 ,. ti3 fr`s?. i'tF •• u�, d{ Al ed + •^. ""' h t` �kl '¢� FF .fg# ••.6- r3.., r\0° „S '+ L'S t/a'.�' iY ,7 •V l i •. Nj E as 1; w ,w ,.ax. °i:., ol, ,VV44 tt :. K� 'z w c r\tT r ''+ '" •`ak. irk. '{ x $ v ' ,. ':'k " {F. 1�, j allair ..m ,�\•, 4 ''•a. +2i. ♦ '. is „Ka' {} . '. + �4.1'\'\ "S,.•r * '� ' A* 41 3' '� 4, 't '"�`4@ N V 0tit lot r 5 T N q XJ 400 ON MI '�' ra '�• 4Z W 0 lip 14 gin IRV 140 40 dp Olt it f a ON 19Y V -v if I �p D t � Y.. f X 5 ei�� hp ,p PRS >�x l r, 3 o, jzt M1} 4 &�5 "Lx sKS. 'fi. h r t n Y•4 r�s a t t°vwu} -� �� a� *,rti+ v -3t"a �s3 d ` `'',s`•;2 F r # ,vr#3 s u'#3. A°a .: '.' y - «,4 asU"§ `- '3.�$� rv'' -Sw Kiafx e } i x is L. , xJn, x .£"v.,i' tiPv S. ,„�+x,a ,{r ,r�X y x r+•x yh, v, < y i x Y lie" '� £`t5 �a�w t d ^z if +fix."�'Syf"" ,� t 7wri � "a^>" w�,�• � �.�h"F'1� C". td� :. .�R s fxx t7x r" �� x a: bn i A 'w `" +b94+f • " , ` x #c$•#t A— m S m ♦r x. x.,h'rx' S+� d +�,#3,:vs �`, � - t n 5 's Y < 7"N" w „u � k.7L, '..� A 4a}4g- a1A� r y. *t}NOP :*^}, 's s7pf t o s my ,w '} t xd, NAhq �'f �� K" A' p s` 'ia � x s,• x z t r -'� 4 x„^ §Mr`i , to vl- n r h n tit mt t X nxF x T} e 3•x- y �A. :;z,, v " w3 "° `5 # " tit YM#+, .xr },, "htx E i .iL"n'�7+€'�' $'+"*-�.�" sf'rt'+,l tmFrsx *�`xr3.-'`z k y�§ a(„n n n ba r r m+i•"{i4y.'trr�M shw41,WI �� . —'07110 Ja#t x? ' s at ia>d a e A r t , n i, s5 l � � hx} � � 1.x4''•&.. ' Ax�4F14�'�J MS �" �+�`�n%�f 1 - � �t�W,'��"f}VK #��f+��t��;1fr x 439 C�" � F.}� x�fi '�. ✓ r + x Ya A` 't r" s � f `nk'�"' x �k�8F w .0 q�t'g, .< ''e tip , at tr�tYy^ .fiie� � k* 'yjbn� " +fig' `�'L. b rk,{}" E � t`� �q `5x„t^r*o-*t`ta, ° .. < 'r'x„t'' k'''a y'b• .,+,��z° .`r' ent Y y,`-v 9.tyS,11 } .has. ia9 € M ➢ � j''A,... Ta .'+", 5 C }? �{ r u' C�� F x ' t v' A C w r v �iJJ t '?h x' r �«�',fiti�q Y"•`�' } '3'#s �, &`F'gk ". t ,y a ',5fi'`ky,�stpd' ,y 9 "t, S,' cw."kr "+r&i. "s.,x k rte" �;` +y�"4k n3^rX� 3`4t'`.+33 �n� '6 t s £, e„a,.2 Y ': { #A„v�ra�. t��+�`'��,,k•' ,£,etas,� P £ (� '. � l z�rx f x x 'r„u "� 4i}�o-�+• t c��?" <'fl 1 i ,�� t F r 'F tT} r'r.. r v*aJ" & t'.xr.�^ } t# 3 o- rx x£�� r•&t S' e r E r ° x "n$�a ..� �xv-1-�n.gd. � $`s l-111 G ! x y i° �x� u. 'k* i^ `<r3'a',�£ *' 'x £ f ,# s �+"tf•'t v - ai i ,,, f :.rc. i a d xr e a r (Special Provisions) =1- No: 1393 rSPECIiiL YROVISIUiVS FOR DRi:DGIRG ,if PALM M, COVE AND DION'S BOATYtiftDi SALII+vi HARBOR, SALEM Work tjolie Done The work to be done consists of the dredging of the channels and basins at Palmer Cove and Dion's Boatyard, Salem Harbor, Salem. Dredged material shall be transported to sea in scows and disposed r of, as herein specified. an The location and details of the work to be done are shown on a set of two (2) plans entitled: "Proposed Harbor Improvements; Dredging Channel and Basin; Palmer Cove and Dion's Boatyard; Salem Harbor-Salem" dated May 1954 and marked ACC. 03232 A & B. These plans are on file in the office of the Department of Public Works, 100 Nashua Street; Boston, and are hereby referred to and made a part of these Special Provisions. 1 General The Contractor shall furnish all labor and materials, tools, plant and equipment, and do all the work necessary to furnish and r install and complete the work in accordance with these Special Provisions and the Standard Specifications for 'Waterways Work dated May 1941. r The Contractor must satisfy himself, by his own investigation and research, regarding all conditions affecting the work to be done and the labor and-materials needed, and make his bid in sole re- liance thereon. During construction the Contractor shall secure all necessary permits from private owners to tresrass r their property in they,�`tl transportation of material and equipment to the work, and the Contractor shall repair at his own expense any damage caused by him to lawns, driveways, structures, etc. r In doing the work, the Contractor shall make the bottom of the excavation as smooth and level as possible at or slightly below the plane of the required depth, but no payment will be rade for any material dredged from more than one (1) foot below the re- quired depth as determined from information obtained from survey$ made under the direction of the Engineer upon the completion of all the work covered by this contract. r ; r t r. rkr _z_ (Special Provisions) No. 1393 ,The plane of mean low water referred to in these specifications is that established by the Engineer during the preliminary surveys for the,work herein described. The Contractor shall furnish regularly to Inspectors on board the dredge or other craft upon which they are employed, when transportation ashore is impracticable, a suitable room for office and sleeping purposes. The room shall be properly heated, ventilated and lighted and shall have a desk which can be locked, a comfortable bed and chair for each Inspector and washing conveniences. I£ such quarters and conveniences are not provided or the work is so located that transportation ashore can be furnished without interference with the work, the Contractor shall provide the Inspectors with transportation to and from such points ashore as-the' Engineer may from time to time designate. If the Contractor maintains on his work an establishment for the subsistence of his own employees, he shall furnish to Inspectors and survey parties vhen employed on the work, meals of satis- factory quality. The entire cost to the' Contractor for furnishing, equipping and main- taining the foregoing accommodations, providing transportation ashore and furnishing meals, shall be included in the price bid for the dredging. Upon completion of the work; the Contractor shall clean up all debris and leave the premises in a neat condition satisfactory to the Engineer. The Department reserves the right to eliminate any portion of the work so as to bring the total expenditure within the amount available for the project. In the disposal of dredged material, the Contrivtor will be required to observe all laws of the United States and all requirements of the War Department in ralati-on thereto. qk� Si . 4 -3- (Special Provisions) No. 1393 ITEM 1 MATERIAL AT PALMER COVE DRED9EDgDISPC3 BD OF CUBIC YARDS ITEM 2 MATERIAL AT DION.tS BOATYARD DREpCLAID CUBIC YARDS DISPOSliD�OF escri_ tion The Contractor shall dredge the areas shown on the plans to the depths shown and dispose of the material at sea, east of a straight line joining Halfway Rock Beacon and Middle Breakers ' Spindle; and southerly of Halfway Rock Beacon, in not less than twelve (12) fathoms of water., over the deposited material at mean low water and in such places and at such times as may ' be approved by the Engineer, or in such other locations as may be designated by the U. S. Engineerfs office. Consstrug&i.qn M ods The dredging shall be to the depths shown on the plans and any material removed from a depth one (1) foot greater than that shown on the plans or beyond"a slope of 1 on 3, as determined by ' preliminary and final sections, will not be paid for under this contract. The dredging limits shown on the plan, or as laid out in the fields . do not remove responsibility from the Contractor for any dmnaco to structures caused by dredging operations. Any damage caused to ex- isting structures of any nature, caused by said dredging operations; shall be remedied at the sole expense of the Contraccori satisfactory to the Engineer. All boulders one (.l) cubic yard or less in volume; which may be found in the material to be dredged, are to be removed as a part of the contract under Items 1 or 2a All boulders in excess of b ' one (1) cubic yard and not ovv>r five (5) cubic yards in volume; which can be excavated by the dredge and deposited in the scow by the usual dumping o)x!rations, are alsoto be paid for under Items 1 or 2, but, if additional work other than the regular dumping opera- tions is required to dump them after they are raised by the bucket] they are to'be paid for under Items 3 or 4. lett of Measurement The amount of dredging done under Item 1 and Item 2 will be de- tormined by measurement of the dredged material in the scows in which it is placed for transportation to the dumping ground, and the determination of the value of the work done will be based upon such measurements after deducting the voliune, if any, which may be excavated from more than one (1) foot below the required depth, or outside the specified limits as shown by soundings, s 4 (Special Provisions) ¢ -4_ No. 1393 4rr i ,,} 34%g . 2aXfient - Material dredged and disposed of (except Rock Excavation) as 9 herein specified, shall be paid for at the contract unit price I per cubic yard, which price shall include all tools, labor; equipment and all incidental work, to oomplete the work to the: satisfaction of the Engineer. RCCK EXCAVATION ACOVES CUBIC YARDS R&IOVLA AND DISPT�OSED OF ITEM•L ROCK EXCAVATION AT DION!S, BOATYARD, CUBIC YARDS,_ RFaiCVL+'D AND DISPOSED OF Description These items shall include' the removal and disposal of boulders of more than one (1) cubic yard . in volume. If any boulders greater than five (5) cubic yards in volume or solid ledge are encountered, they shall be stripped of all loose material ,and left clear.' Construction Metbods Rock Excavation shall be removed and disposed of in conformance with the applicable requirements stated in Items 1 and 2 of these Special Provisions. The Contractor will be required to conform to all regulations re- 'gasCdng blasting, and will be required to repair all damages re- sulting from his operations, at his own expense. On the completion of the work, the Contractor will be required to remove- any loose, shattered or projecting fragments of rocki which may endanger the safety of boats using the basins or channels. Method of, `ea�Lreln,�ty, The quantity of rock excavated and disposed of under Items 3 and 4, as herein specified, shall be biased on such method of measurement as the Engineer may determine to be the most practical. Basis of Payment Rock Excavation removed and 'disposed of, as herein specifiedi shall be paid for at the contract unit price per cubic yard; which price shall include full compensation .for all tools, labor, equip- ment, materials, grading and all incidental work to complete the work to the satisfaction of the Engineer. Poo Tee' a� s7<ese dyke to . � R� dsem3 4-71 �(mreuarcd ,re,yt� Se3tn r:U at' /exr -EY)C!"I, -_ sr3 k !- 1Y8' caz' asf QngsFR r -ch ` d 17`K= • —7 —,—` 4 i 'iFEc ri ,�C j P 3� . Falmer. !�P '1 �$} Cove. m•a.vr.' Fc.a.a � [ � v a zSEG T 101Y' 'BIB, sca% L ZO O'" LOCATION MAP sca a '=amo'i IVD 6;, H. � 9T1Es o W z.Q i �f Na T� EQ3l7- Q ale< , m � ui UA r 5 y 8 YgtL FRs C c �S C1U ' 84 DGS N � I � ' Ada ,A:4's� .�u4ICYrf. q '4 09 't`.. "toyauf T9eiM Nlct 4t a PflL . Plan occonio anytn4 Pet/fio» of SHE TLANp PROP€RILES , to. construct a sfone ..dyke i2 Y ' 4 �-mss P/ace solid f111 in fide .wafers of JAL EM., HARBOR - 544 ARBOR$/- 4 E M w-4ssAcH USE TTS MAY ='1966' BK5616 PG003 Farm WD 54 Reg•&Uore Lvld See Doc.No 731,379 u�l1e C2nntmaluurulfll of �{aa�ttrhusP2ls No. 5447. � f 1 f 1 &Plan iDhrrras. Shetland Properties--------------------------------- t of Salem----------,in the County of Essex-------------and Commonwealth ' aforesaid, has applied to the Department of Public Works for license to construct a i stone dike and place solid fill in Palmer's Cove, at its prop- erty in the city of Salem,------------------------------------- i and has submitted plans_of the game; and whereas due notice of said application, and of 1 the time and place fixed for a hearing thereon, has been given, as required by law, to the 1 '.:ayor and City Council of the city--------of Salem-------------- 1 Nam said Department, hnving heard all parties desiring to be heard, and having fully considered said application, hereby.+a4Jaat-to-th�WM+e�ull ofJLa 1.w•ermw�erld-6el,nril, ' 1 nuthonzes and licenses the said----____________________________________ 1 t I I Shetland Properties----------------, subject to the provisions of the ninety first chapter of the General Laws, and of all laws which are or may be in force applicable i . . { thereto,to construct and maintain a stone dike and to place. and ' maintain solid fill in Salem harbor at Palmer's Cove, at Its property in the city of Salem, in conformity with the accom- panying plan No. 5447. I l n stone dine may pe constructed with a top width of 10 feet and an outboard slope at 115 horizontal to 1 vertical and having . f its toe on lines described as follows: Beginning at a point IVI marked "C" near the westerly end of an existing bulkhead built under license No. 142 of the Department of Public ftrks and i e� being 170 fact, more or less, from the easterly end of said bulkhead where it makes.a corner with an existing granite wall; 1 r .. . ; BK5616 PGO 04 ' thence extending about southwesterly to point "D° a distance amounting to 118' feet from a chain link fence running along the shore; thence turning and running about northwesterly 350 - feet, more or less, to point "L"; thence turning and running about northerly 15 feet, more or less, to point "F•'; thence - turning and again running about northwesterly 200 feet, more ' or less, to point "O" being located 100 feet from said chain link- fence on the shore; thence turning and running about northerly in line with the westerly property line of the licen- see a distance of 45 feet, more or less, to Point "H existing bulkhead; in i in an the there shown on said amd plan and in accordance with tits details there indicated. The area enclosed by said dike and the mean high water line may be filled solid, as shown on said plan. This license is granted subject to the following express conditions: Only fill consisting of earth and rock free of organic matter may be placed, and at any time that the Department of Public works deems that the material being used in said dike or as fill is unsatisfactory, said Department may require that the work be suspended until satisfactory naterials are secured. The licensee, its successors or assigns, shall at no time raise the grade of said fill to an elevation in excess of 20 feet-above mean low water unless approval is first secured from the Department of Public works, or its successors. In the event that the work authorized ncreby results in I shoaling of adjacent areas in the opinion of the Department of Public works, the licensee shall remove the shoal areas to the satisfaction of the said Department, i rNothing in encs license shall be construed as authorizing encroachment on property not owned or controlled by the licen- see except with the consent of the owner or owners thereof, j In no event shall the toe of said dike be closer than 25 feet from the limit lines of the basin dredged by the Depart- ment of Public works under Division of waterways Contract No. 1393, as indicated on said plan. This license is granted subject to all applicable Federal, State, County and Municipal laws, ordinances and regulations -- r The plan of said work,numbered--------5 4 4 7----------is on file Ne office of said Department.-and duplicate of said plan accompanies this Liceeenee, I and is to be referred to as a part hereof, The amount of tidewater displaced by the work hereby authorized te`FeH1�e on by said Department, and compensationh' s 'ebn therefor"A made by the amid----------- . Shetland Properties, its--------------------------- L r r I 1 8K5616 PG005 ' arw)-esefgna,by Paying into the treasury of the Commonwealth thirty-seven and one- half (37y) cents for each cubic yard so displaced, being the amount hereby assessed by said Department. r Nothing ill this License shall be so construed as to impair the legal rights of any pers sn:* This License shall be void unless the some and the accompanying plan are recorded within one year from the date hereof, in the Registry--____ of Deeds for the Southern 1 District of the County of h.ssex. 3n M"eloea Milfrraf, said Department of Public Works here hereunto set their hands ithis--------fifteenth--------day of---- October,--------_ In the ' Year nineteen hundred and sixty-eight. ' I . .._ Deparfinenf o/ I - Public Works r- monwoullh by the said � of the further sum of rthe amount del iy the Governor and council as just and J equitable charge for ll' 11 r 1 I OWNERS, Robert I, Lappin, Marion L, Lappin and Beatrice Zai ` 8wampscott, in the County of Essex and Commonwealth of Mass- '� achusetts, Trustees of the Shetland Properties,.under a Declaration of Trust, dated May 20, 1968 and filed as Document X127;431 in Essex South District Registry of Deeds and recorded in said Registry , at Book 5532, Paget � Certificate l31a8205/Also for title see deed reed fn ea dRegl8try of Deeds in In -Book 32, Essex 88.Recorded June 18,1969. 30 On, past 11 A.M. R99 i r I IG Pit:a at i arlfavni°.n M m u�@ttd(f:'til - ua; N 'fir °.s; ,s:. �t`•:::: °�6-80-4Y1, r ii `::;Ilni'.afutLi+ 011�1a1^1... rotY2 Ml'vto 1u iti:aw al fr+lYnNa aLnnlal,n ryC;1•LL}'Y:r,l.^41q Ilna IP LtlnOtl In9m1[olna'ImntMrdiNll ,^ rm,nt:fo ism`ilr •' ....::.Casc��.5yj1S{®�IiTapllEliiY.�°se"Deet •of•Bnvi�s'tthl.it11- '[I.I. nivielok ........ . .Adol i"Zis ;'2'.Ji•�. .wL!N:aflPe Nall.barfaftca in[w+,nnP�fadf tuY ri$ ""`.:'iyndluh.u,Eftpcgw•Ona 3 April 1981 +I'..•ft ,•b maw rr„f , .T M,,jr^p., +ry t1,LLbl<!I HIte4P:r,..t:•:r-" S , .. •ir,• +.fl ul:Launll+•q 1C L�f u.r l.rn f!L y1Lrr1 ILI v n•r'4bb 4stpirguaei OMe lit Eppiiadble) , ... 1.r:I. .:.,.....1 ............ fir.„f.f u+ ' . . v, .n .1 m. in ••rrv,r"PL IG INI. "+• ..- I', r,. .r'•J ryapw +,n=• Contract'Humber• D"V33-B1-C-0076:..r. . , :;nu 1.11 r It' 1•,in,+t•'r 11 ',,.n.I••.I,I: , 6.'.:�off N'( DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY "'•PERMIT`; r. .• : ,", +t a :• :rt •., .. r..lr 14\.c:•.0 r ..lel.r., •..,:.,,..:..r..., . . . en n.;. .. 25 July 1980 ,a.or..,y . ... ( ,•... .-rt,•:ma n'I, :n'u ., �irlerii"ip to wddnn iaemn Oalid .. ori3n(n11 ' ' 'tAtb. wfmanlixf Patterns woe^In6r,lfe:IImP nwiWlili stat"[ m !• W,tiaC len 10 01"Riven and Herbert Act of Mach 2.1689 122 US.G,4021;r,, .. r. ...,nl ;.,.i,, y..r,.„..•r;•n, ,.,,T 1 1 Discharge MMWtl ar 1111 rnswrial into wnan of the United$stn upon dq iuwnp o/i oiimh cram the tiaae'{ip of the Army ,,, ,,r,atlinp rlllqut�1,14 Cl,m1 of.En6inatra pvrwtnl to Srctidn aW.91+.IneaFleartl1"(ptil{!oliutlon Co�tro1,M{B6 C�uM e}6,P,L.S2b6W; ••y,.,•.,.Sl:a y•.•:•Q.t,L, • AI Tnnspom d, b .r,m r.••ithie eaof n It.n..q.euttase Arnry rating through IM Chief of Engineers pursuant to Section, Nn up1dr t6rinpc1if, luijiiS(eee Anal 19 Ano1 p,+:.,:.. :.;t66 SN¢1052:,P.L,82•W21:. -MBBaDept. Of EnV1r i`^QUa1'ity'•-BAgr'aa1.•n.;„+•4,b I P.T d (Division of waterways) AT V. Cane Cavanaugh-,o• (\_ .:1.r 1• :•,., ... 1-11 winter•Street':•.9th"floor,t. •.�,. .. ,:_,. �,..:,a'r Boston. 'Masaactidsat6i"t 02110°h.�'r.:�•.:.: .,',.:..,.r.,.-,,.�.,,,,,.r... 'r�b,.2:.^:n L.•11 ,o'W.,11:-•}•,.: .• '.qnd 4,•+tramer r1 .4•,:d„•t.:n,t }.:,: _IZgryeatrauthtaireJ h,.11fe Srerrwt urns[Arany: .'_ .nd..ur. ,.1 "any.; lr if1 )y, ,d_'Fedge.a,channel,and,basis 1175' long ,and„rapgi,ng iaLwid ,figm; 0;t jio 1001 ' ,'IA+, •ao mean low water.- The mateirial,"40;000••cubic,-yards-of Isend:and,siltwill 1.7 Tstnrr '' •>bAnretmived"by•glaihshell or`bucket'dredge;And traiiapo-''ted"by'�sebve.`fbr'itir§poesl ", @C"'te Pldzbleiiead t Site. " ^ n „., Ma,. (-,.Ir:^_,::'t b J .•.."`Y. , ;...... .1'.�..a:-„`n L.41-n r.. : ... .y.::./•LOI rM.•i.:• ,,...1.:. .,...•lli T,•1.:'1::,.!. .:. .,.. ..: .1:2• .-r:l: .„:�..,....'i 1'.:. , .I •rtlr•.„ /iThdiIMarblehead Dump Site is about 9.4'nautical miles liortheast:*U-Boston -'•1; , . .,,^,Lighted.Horn Buoy B.within a circular,area about,2.nautical.miles,in,diameter L^ f,,... r•. '.whose center is at the intersection of lines beariag ll°. (TRU`) frou•'Baston l; Lighted' Horn Buoy B and 1120 (TRUE) froom'MArbl'ehead*Lighted_marked;by-Mobs tBay t ;;Lig .ted.8uoq,A whose coordLlates are 42, 25,,;42 Horch.hatitudeand 70°,34 00' ,tWest,longitude. . It is marked as-Foul Area•,cn-U 8 C 6 C.S Chart-13267...: , L,L rr t •n • .r.:,• •. .:yl"Selem;Harbor ,. .., . ., r ....t. ....-Ie,r Ia:.a.6c.:m. at Salem, Massachusetts in.acwad"m uiln the N,mand dnwlnp alathed h,ato which so from sled tome ro,dt a Pat ut Inti rt ll tun dnrbp:dLe .r a:,• fibnumMurulMrlkfmllaidtolidcalluam,r4f.f Plane entitled "Propoaed:Harbor„1 provemeats Maintenance Dredging-Palmer Cove'in Salem Harbor-Salem-Essex County;,Mass” in one sheet,. dated "June 25, 1980". - •• "°�' fo"1ee11u Ins foNu"{N[undrtiunr. ' a. That all acli,Nrtt ide-ol ed amid sulho,Nrd Wain their he Consistent with IM tome and conditioner of thin mrm,f:aM thel ars, acllvain not slxcilmarty Identified and authus,ard Attain Nall constitute a ve4tron of the Term and Condrlrom of thisDnm+l which my result in the modification.f"mrn,on at smaiion of this partial,in whate or in put,a v1 forth,nae taecit"If m Gainers, Con Chant I a It hereto,And In the+nititution of such legal pouaNngt As the United Slat”Go"tnmaat mW comodn afmrmeta, whet”,o,not this Permit tet barn P,tv+a"t,modified,Wtmndtd a r"oked In whole As 10 pars. ENG FORM 1721 EOITION Or t APR to IS OBSOLETE, It as 114$44071 ...+._..iiia: •f .r;.,, e. Tial as alNtnln wmodiipAyfd} .til�Ynegrj !t ''��''""� "atm of iM United ibtn a rfa,wrmm,b r all o(E}Iyl Ana '"p y, .:.•,t tlmd{rda o/arlWmsna,pohibltlrms,pnpmttwm tUermem and manspaMrul aactkai n AlMlsparW/e11 w this►OKI"WWAN,Md•';;.'.;',:,; PatNnan Cwltrol'Ael'ef g7211.:E•.92-090:6Ef1Ut.Et01,aM 1Aalaa/fatgtlofbi�wealt enlencwajMiiyl ll,IYT�,V.y OJdR, . "'•,;,:�.,.^ Ee Euu 10021,or purwant to anphaable elate end bW ler, "f`^•��" a. Tba win tM Mte11Y NItpN.'ed heraln fnwNas a dbdlat2a dudty Id QaMINatlWi p gwslYn,01 M%i pG0ib111 lmdading fkadeed Or ISI msterul),into*start of the United Italy,Na wthW ind OcIMtV"elf.if abWUabU Sada Wal{ry UW4W* n NWUd t., or modus""durin9lha tftT Of Ibl{oormd,b mu111led if ru'•"4MP1',to Wnlgm with wthmhed*as dintcu by a lasplr cwd&fcb an "Into S month of tM afaceM data of dry re*Ibon a modification o1 wdtlr ijWliry tisndads:"a a 6rlcltd iw an 1mWatentn an Wan conumed In ornh fe,hsd.w modified%Undsrd6 err wdhIA such fongfr petted of Oma at the thulct Upinen,In construction wlh the UeyonU AdrrfwUratW of the EmrionR"td rrotectwn Apmry,oral detmnha to to raaomMO uta the CWWMUrrna. .'S:n(• :7.. :T:'{if:ref: i£leif�r"' d. That the Nssnarga mit not wuroy a tNeatenn pr endmpered Waahs a IdentiOed under the Endtngered Speclaa Act,or malnger"is critical Mbnel of Wit urging. t. That the afnwln apmr to.make aary•teawneble dlWl to prowGeb t0 conuwobn of Opaafan Of the work arinorufd ' Mummairupner wpto malmin arq adihrew*read on ffl•.vi Pt;and natwd environmeMM*atun•, ' 4 Thal IM parrAllis aping that Mwlll piawcYia lM c011{SfYC11M W Yiofh NihWh10 kinin In a TmMf ur tl ro TInITIn my . hpaWiwn of wsta.gwlsy,_,, .. . .: .. .. ,•: :•. ., : . .. ..i'... _.ograe yv p'Tlui '1.am ti iittn afWl Peiimli'thr'ords, Eetwrvi ar'th althrhad N pert teted u d IautOrnyi w into at Is in ' . .. alrpeaJot)s hal.smi,lire dnmels necelW y m.Wdrr,tQ,nwra that 1M KlNity bel�q.l?erlam�d under autMtlly Of d1U paT1/ft in ' '•,. '" ,atcWdarisY th"t0'iumianacondivanthiettrlMdMaln;-. ,,. .. .. ' h. That file permntn dull maintain the atwclwy or meek wthwind Nniri in flood condition Said in aaanlurce iMdr Na Won 1,W f dranmos affect"hewt0. •. I. That this p"mil does net claim my praWty roll mha in fief arta W miter W,or my entuaw prNtoas•,ae0 that it ane Mg wthWlte any"fluff,to property w invasion at lights Wally 1ntfulipfTml of Fara.",Sate,or local tams Of reduatioe nor deal it V owun ttonlallrmiml to oWain Sure aloW jaaolrep"led by 1,w for the wtiviry anthWued hewn. , • �,r} ••' 1. That Into perms moo be wmmerlly,suspended.in whole or in pat.upon a finding by it Muffle moot a that lou v dleU wspmsbn of the aen ity authorized harem"calls be in t0 omerai oublre tnteeitt•Sridi luipen)iaeduil betfea I upon•autpt M err;• the p,imiltn'ct t"mean nW<e rhii ot'which Pill hndcate 11110 aatmt of ani iufpenllen;121 the rhea ter Ihb se:bn,ab 121 my cdfreuNa.pr pnemuli"nraune,to ler taken br ON yetmbin which re domed reaoalafY by dee oletius Enppwr to woo knTinml,herrds to the general aabM intaa4 Tt&Pbwdbn SWI ukt immed sur wtiw w coney whh W prr/Ylleneol Nn notln. • Q,. within tin da1'n-folliiwnp raaipt of the notice of'iwpeWm.at Putnliies moo("Owl a hiring In Oido to ofemw informelion .relevant to a dgibbn a to"0th his pamil Should ha ninmud,modified W"eked It a hnrfnp b nieuniggeth AW be conducted purwrant co proudlon Wercribed try the Chit of Erhpingim.Alla canpneuon al the 01,1114 or mlNb•msonabb fee alba issuamn of In,sv%Wsmn nalice go the pammln it m Meting is reywlted,the parol will either be resited",madifled W awed. t •• a. Thu the P r ll Ilii b i+e0r mo6tha,"leads r rweead in what,W moon i1 the fiacraary of l0 Afmya hb suthnieM ' a raeefematmrt dnamieei the that,her bin a weanan of my 01 the bine W Owididans Of tills ring"W thin Audi action would ,. odeer"ia be in t0 public intasu.Any Such tnpp,burm,aufpenfioh,otrerwaion chili become*ties"30 dMaher rwafpt by the permits"of milt""take of such at,"whch Owl weciy the We w conduct mananlind same unless if)wAthin ON 204ay period �NIS�,�Y the p,rmntee Is ate ro nihtatW M demonana IMt w Ne alleged*,ween of the to... and the conditions of tnbostrich did not in rR.-w fan,occur ler hal Ni sliepdrblamn wt asidma4 and ON 0armhtn Mibean operating in WnWbnea MN the tams and eon,60o u'. of the arms and is able to piwWe atisfactory afuraacn that futon Opaetian Nall be In Nil aomWiance Win tM ami we caed,leon,of tha ptmril;W 121 anthm ON alarsam 20-day period,Onarmiltn rmttu that awbilc Mrhpbe hod lodgment old end writ"evbarsa concerning t0 plodowd mnalcofan,wwentbn or ravxobn.TO conArct of Ibt1'0artno s el ileo procedure res making a r,ao decilionertho 10 nvmfy,sutpe-dor rwnke Ne gamin In"hate Or in pat diad ha pwWmi wpr011krfer preKPbM by the Chief of enp"arn. .. . . 1. That In 1pofhp"sm,11,the O m,,,mt harelied an she Warmatun cab data which the pamiffn ha prwtded In connection "In hie minis application.if,subamuens ro IM nwaKe of this parallel such Intionou en m0 deur pole n to isIM Incorrectly w inacNmt tM palms nW b mod tack urs lorded a revWad,in whose a in pert.and/or 1111 pamrfvenl ley,to a00itbn,Innhute a oropprletetewplocwd rip. - •. ' ' M. That arty moolk4lim wrmntbn,or femulim of this permit shot not be the bags for any claim for dmngel W'nll the Umud Sura. n. Thal the pamillee,hall twoy the Onan:f Enpinm a who Jim the activity wlhwued tonin will be OptmmmW,a rerin shNm,of iM hale of cm,,m m,as tM O.nntt Engineer may Specify.and*I any wweelm of"pre,It far a paled of more Nen on,wan,rerumaian of walk and its cotnpbhOn. r '^4l ' Z . + r<+:•�F,;`K�,tSI�,',o•;�-�.r 1' .. . •�:...: - ,.. .'cfll,,tiG-, t: .: .�f ,:va .tor.• .� �'�' '' '1+ . r:�+:.n 'r' Titi fouoewng SpKali CoidNMt w�u tri appluable whin apprOpr�ot�i"; „" .,"' " ° STRUCTURESINORAFFECTINONAVIOABLEWATERS OP THE UNITED STATES: ;:f;;: i At Thal lhdpermd clan nolplMflta1M n14111Haw Yia/li easy aallllap Of frropoaed Pe6ral project andthat lMperinlllNtfulll pot .•..;.;, p Mhlua to tompfhinton lot damage W Injury to the structures,or Wolk sulhorlred herrn which mry be Caused by a IMIS fpm nnnfgorluiat operastOnt unNru4n by tin Wuled Btaiw In thputlk lMHect. + 13. That no altemgl Mau be made by the pfrmitin to prnpl the full end tin use A this Public of 42 naytgabta watan as as adhectnl Io the atUmly aWhorgad by ihsparmlt. . - •', C. That .1 the 141018y of bgftit and Spina on any Structure or work oulhorltad h#rsn it not alMwde provided for by law,Such .,:v:.�• aspens and stalalt#1Mon be ptascr.btd by the United SUlr1OaaR Guard Shell to initialled and masnhalned by and at lin aspirin of She it. Thai IM PrimdlN, upon HL4ot of a oatuce of neatelun of Ma permit or upon its exploration talon LOmpfasfon 01 iter Nmoaled Hrucbr#or work,due,w+thoul#.game to 1Mtanned Spin erl0,in Such bme and mMnr w tin BaoralaY o1 lin Army a h+t aulborued rtwtteatUwe may daecL htlwe'1M polerwiy to M former Chat urn! 11 lin pwmitlN falls to cotrlaly wain IM dtfKnon of She Seclelary of IM Moray or no suihonrtd rprtlenUlM.IM Secretary or no dnipMf may in an the Waterway to sit ��O1Ot� IOlmer cMWUM.by tanlrulor6lMrwiSa,MdfKONIIM Coli tIMINiIrom etas pwtmdN. . e Structures ler Small Buts:That permulhe hrrtby recognition dearva f Pity due tin ltmmftpilimluM Mmin msi'bo wbjKl a .tom,• damsP by wave wash loom passing vessels.The btuamta al I'1 gafmh don not n1:eN the parmntis Irmnkin tag dl picpar stem to *C mwft she..Mainly W'the Structure permltled halon and tae Safety of butt moored thereso from dismay#by valva slash and the PermtUer/MI hat hold the Umtto Stain fade for MY Such dump. MAINTENANCE DREOOlf8a; ' - - a. That waren the work sutborbtd he im kludn,oia'lodoi malminafrca,drtilyng,it may be perlarmad,usher this pnmit for N ' Yeah loom the dire of lstuennuf lhnptikill finP years uMKi olha ors,lmdscwedl: ' '1 f/ b. That ike_perminN will adrin IM Daukt EnquttK in wcidrq at laws Ryo wN4p/me in ihnwo to undaHake eery mainimance DISCHARGES OF DREDGED OR FILL MATERIAL INTO WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES: ..... t-•'.••' a. That Illi discharge wi11 be carried fan In Conformity froth itis Stas and,objectue o/the EPA Gutdnimf tstaWhlwd pumraM to O' Section d0albl el the FWPCAex d Published In 110 CFR 270: . • •Q Thai IM discharge will consist of coltabl#material free from toxic pollutants in Grow than tow?unlltin:: ' e. TMI the fill created lost The discharge will as mostly maintainedSO Prevent erosion and other norpyrtt Scum of poiludon;ash it. Thai the discharge wilt not am,in f compopMi of IM Natianl Wild Md Scoot Riser SNtam o,n•component o/s Slue win ' � YM xMit eiesrty{Iern. - . ,• DUMPING OF DREDGED MATERIAL INTO OCEAN WATERS: ` IN This the dumping will be tarried out in aehlormRy WIN IM Wd4 oblKlnek uId rtgalnmenta of the EPA crittris unbInta d ourwant to Section 102 of the Marin Prolaetion,Research andSarsctuarin M of 1272,punished in 40 CFR 22D220. b. That Ilea permniN Place Pia copy of this permit In a CpntpiCuaue pew m 111111"UN l01341 uteri fu the Iranfporeasian and/or • dumping at lin dredged material n aulhorhed herein. Tha permit thatl became eflKliee on the date of the District Eripimee's ugnnwe. '•"'"i' Peem.un 13Y KC ash auto mptY with lin i#Imt and COM1dtteant o/Ind ulmn. �1w1 ``•e r 3•/8•!9/ PA R EE DATE J. HA ONY P.Z.. Chief Engineer BY AUTHORITY OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY: ' E. EDGAR III TE ` Colonel, Corps of Engineere r Division Engineer • TrMftcree hereby-iarms'to rsmplY with the Ienm Mdrxndn'rorn of trod Forma. I .:, u TRANSFEREE DATE a .• ' Y�. y 1 pli Re 147M 1!51 i PF RFT r o. The it IM eehtlly tulhdri"d Moan,1 not lotted on w01140111 N/A �•d,y pl - fp thea voe Irani 1 dm oft�pt ante o1 th11 Porm,l unfeil olhomho/wtlllydf and enol eatwiltd an a before' day of nn a .1984 -.Ithrn yNntiom the dawol rtwa!Ra of 11111 Petered UMns othanldw 1pecdudtthe pefirul,,l err wmwedy.reroUd or tpec,Malty taartded l/lell wtatnfinny awls, i . • .. •^, 'p. Thal Md isermil dOtl not authati0 w spotoPe ibe;toelbunlw,at Particular IIsuCNrat,IM nlhwweiloniispP!Ceal of Wretch. troy tenulm eulMHniton by hba Convan or other apocin of the Tedaol aowfnmml. , a, That It and when the aamilln deaM to obandwl the atimily eutharoed hatin,unless such obsndonmant spat of a trander p,octdure by whish the Permnitl to ttambnenp his interests herein to a Thud Paly purNanl to athetal condition 1 hamol,art must ' enlwe Ihe itee 101 eOnd11ton MIIdaCiOry t01M OiOnCI El,pinnr. , neGfutya toftecWd th.t wrmn enth IM RegisterofDeeds at other appmwl/n ollmia charged twill,the ralamnfibdapttt,lei MOR1�t p . mcwdl of fide to and eplereso,n oat wopeny. S. That there thall M two unanamble interference will,navigation by the e•illemt w um of the atieity,anhwind herein. , s. Thn th4'Ptemn nue not be'trwiflased to a third Party without prier written notice to the 04bfcl Eneiarei,either be the ItanNneaY Witten agtermant to comply with rel tami and eandttwin of this Pettish or by IM fianstan wbnrif fns fo Ihh prrrml,n Na Was Ptoyttled bolder and thereby./VCnng to comply weh en term will conditions of this patent,In addnrosL it Ihe petmntn Z%lnt iM meat&dulha,utd Mom by cohseytrice at,realty.the deed doll tetererce thit permit and the torhi Rd canddwm t•*�•• tthe,hed harm and inn Pennd.shill be 104001d 0104 with the deed wilAtim Register of ends a blM,1ppiop,4nof144f. ' 11.Spadd Condition More list conditions mol up spccihcePy 10 the Prop0led tuYtluO or.awe auit gilled ply IhilpilNnt: a. This permit authorize$ periodic maintenance dredging',of;'the.described p aeea'not to exceed.ten years from the date of.issuance; except.thit.the permittee is required to notify this office, in writing and to describe f7Y • the proposed'disposal site'90 days in'advance of the, Intedded'dete,of any �l• maintenance work. Work may not begin until written authorization ie , received from the Corps of Engineers. -If the permitteedesires-,t6-iontinue C. maintenance dredging beyond the tan year period, hd must r6"' ' i a,re- validation of that portion of his permit which authorized the maintenance dredging. Is. The permittee is required to notify this office as soon as' possible, soin writing, of the exert location of the disposal site. The-proposed disposal site shall not be used until the permittee has received ifrftten ^� authorization from thin office.. In most cases we will be able to-.notify you by return mail that the site is acceptable. However, it'may take as long as 60 days if a field visit or additional public review ie'ileceesary, c. Applicant shall notify the U.S. Coast Guard, First Coast Guard District, 1 150 Causeway Street, Boston, Massachusetts at least 48 hours prior to de- parture date and time of dumping operations. ' d. Dredging and dumping operations will be monitored by Goverment personnel. a. Dredging and disposak-of materiels will be under controlled coaditione so as to provide data on general effects of sea dumping. The permittee will be required to dump at a buoy set in the disposal site and will be required to hold each scow at a complete halt at the buoy before and during the dumping of the pockets of each scow. f. All activities authorized by this permit shall be consistent'with safe 1 construction practices and in keeping with the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970. The Division Engineer may require modificationd, to the method of construction or equipment used in order to comply with adegiiate;safecy standards. ' :y 3 1 1 1 M :.l. .� • �' ::a�.Y...Jlij•�:{�:�1'. ?.rt T�p;. yl .. .: . 'e•,•� ��- ?Thin .. . .. .., .. •i'i..�' � .. r ,.,t Tiri lodomnp Specht Gljdrobawillbr iaoiktbh whin tpiipprlitii• " ..,. •.. .,: .. - ^I a.I '?,,f ,'•• STAUCTUAESIN6RAfFECTINGNAYICA9LEWATERS6FTktuNITEDSTATEa: '''Ir' �" '�•'-' '�' •" •`'' a^+u'•,,::r� ff. Ta11MS Perms don rept tOPestim 1M MUdMdntel{/11100Picini Y mwAlli alY' 1 Proposed Fachill Piciid An MN parWNM gall hill #K"hired 10 COmpMIiln to,dpnap W inWIY to IN atata,a W Wpb f,11the 0d herein vhkh they be Caused led a nlWil Iron " •: a ; ' 'renting W lmuru operalamunderuWnbr the UnitedStah"Inlhi'pltlk ln,mi: '• '•' • U. That no fireman shall be moa by the wermitia to snore,the tan was Ira use by,IM wbtk of an cast split N a edlannl to the aclw,ly aulhartedby rho penn(l. ' r� I. Thai It the duper of hphu heed 1,00,211,aft env slructura w Work'wlneilml'arlin is Wert eathawke provided for by Ifo,each bans And Ng!ub As way oro PIMIAW by the United Sut"Coal Build"Ito Installed and me III try ad as la apentaof the :Sill.}('i pe,mma. •,. '. •. . . Is. Thai is stimuli". upon reason, of a nolcr e1 terocfiao of Ihd'peimil a•upon fit iapbaimi[e/tilt compktkn of IN aulheNled ilt"t W e w was,.shah•w,Ihw,I as mrm ro Ina United Sister and masses,time ami plena'a din Saaeury of 00 Army a tui aulho"ned insem"fal"may ds"l,i"Im the w1lerWa, to,h rwint earmho iL to Ose phmliiti We to comply whin ina rbranan o1 she Secretary of the Army a she"1hw,eed mwewntalm.It,Small,whit designee may'"ton tin ems, murr to nes (ami cirrlmlwn,by[or WWI a otherwise,and,icowr ms'at'iha enf lion Ili Phinrii". .. „ Structures for'Smsil shelf:That Perry la itheitby r"oonri"IN;iYthlily shit thWunlet re Piimitted Minn may lle subject to dame9r by wase wash fromes ,p ,inp Kahan,.The beuanre of me,permit due not rehere'sm ptmtiltfe from mlilig an orae,nine to ':1•T••'4r4 imam the matronly bl'the'tmciumoemsined#Klein and IN lately at bull moo1M thael0 bom derhapa lry wane reach and the parmdl"faNI 1-01 held the Uened SUI"lobe for any each dannspe. • MAINTENANCE DREDGING: I I - .I .I,. ' a. Thos when the wars aYihorued Grein includespIN enoda winter; dtediong,it may ba performed I ndp Coif Permit for --nail from she data of Issuance of thn permtt IIM yeah unfni aherwbe iMrcsudl: ' tnb. Thal the PermNla. will advise the Odukt Engineer In Yelitiftpu labs Will works balae he intends awelimahe amr manlenan , �atdpng.• .. . DISCHARGES OF.DREDGED OR FILL MATERIAL INTO WATERS OF THE UNITEDSTATES: a. That the athape wn1 to carried call in Whermim with the pots and,obj"lMa of-the EPA GuwWimasubtidedP menial to Section apetbl of nes'FWPCA andpubisud In 40 CFR 234 ; b Thal Ica alluss rpa will cored,01 suiuMa mamrW tri from folic pollulentm/n w,"', l,n,ewntiNa: Lrf ♦' C. That the ins aumd be the diKhape vat be property maintained to Well,eroton std cher Mnpanl uwe"III polishers:and a d. That,lhe discharge wall not caw in a aorehemns a Ile National Witdand Sank Rho S",m'cr M•COIrpOnlnl of a Sula w,to y ltd scenic river,aytem, - DUMPING OFDREDGED MATERIAL INTO OCEAN WATERSf .: l•' _ •" a. That der afumPinp win W eu,ted mut in conformity wIN to pa1L obtatlwy and Instrument,of she EPA winuaabilhed Pculwnt I059cdai1020f she Mtrme Ptot"ikn,flera,ehand Sammunre Act of 1972,Published in 000FR MM. e b, That the ptrmnlee shall Pins,a espy of ewe gamut in a Contpfp,0u1 Wan in IM Ya1t to W used for the Irun,t>DOrifiren aMtor durrlpnnp of the dredprd masertai as authai,ed arull ' Thal permit shall become eft"N"on rare dam of the Odprcl E,pldrvy sWminre. parnmY)l and roes to maty with she terms amt tombliOns of Incl permit. f R EE DATE N, P.E., Chief Engineer BY AUTHORITY OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY: w- E. EDGAR III �D Tic E •%/ Colonel' Corps of Engineers sion Engineer Tra�nsfw"hanativ aftM7to comply wuh Ihe term,and mr orlorn of ibs Arms. .••ami TRANSFEREE DATE wow y EXISTING ZX ING OROUMOI XISTING OWUMC) I mrrs CP_ IrL 4e. U z ce -90 MA—W ORMGING LOCUS a (ORGOOlma UNIT) i VARIAOL 0 veRTICAL 1'.6, 7 ACED FROM kO.S. CHARTomm TYPICAL DREDGE SECTION OF AT CLAMP CHT"us LONG POINT zoom OIL p1t, t24 0 R. PIAL UARIA's, Rv. '�. agftH MARK A. -c. ON IN WALL'.',;-9 -MZ. izhiag AIL" : 4w A TO Be DREDGED 0 -*B IMPORTED t.EOG9 +-c- OR*pGINQ UNITS. 1. 54 SHOWN IN RED pw CPI ti AWL"Fle COVE MASONRY. PLAN r WALL 0 400 ICO Sao ELEVATIONS ARG IN FEET AND RENINS ABOVE PROPOSED HARBOR IMPROVEMENTS THE PLANE Of MEAN LOW WATER.MINUS FICURSS MAINTENANCE DREDGING INOWATE DEPTHS BELOW YHA'r SAND FLAWS. PALMER COVE IN SALEM HARBOR 4°000 C.V. or, DREDGE MATERIAL IS TO 60 SALEM FL^CED IN SCOWS AND OI5PO5ED Or WITHIN ESSEX COUNTY MASS.THE LIMITS OF THE 9KIS'TIWO UUMPINO SIT9 - APPLICATION BY AT4e-?S*-4Z-N, 70%34*-OC-W C2 N. Mt. 01^0AETER). (FOUL. AREA) DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ENGINEERING COMM OF MASS. — DIVISION OF WATERWAYS JUNE 25,1980 SHEET I OF.t ROBERT A. BRAMAN CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYOR ACC. NO. 05154 WAREHAM,MASS. l9•': A, f. General Evaluations ' i 1) This project is primarily for the purpose of mooring pleasure boats. It will be municipally managed, with its use open to the public. The channel leads to a point in close proximity to our Federal channel which continues on to the north toward the South River. This Palmer Cove area was last dredged in 1960. , 2) The applicant contacted the harbormaster and several businesses and residents to investigate land disposal sites in the vicinity of the dredging site. Because the surrounding area Is highly developed, there ' were no sites available for temporary, or permanent disposal, with the exception of some small wetland areas adjacent to the harbor. To haul the material in sealed trucks to an inland site would be cost prohibitive. 3) Elutriate, bulk sediment, bioassay, and bioaccumulation testing was performed an the materiel to be dredged. It consists primarily of sand and silt. The other Federal resource agencies have reviewed the tests ` C and found the material suitable for ocean disposal. This, as well as ' other types of material from Salem Harbor have been disposed of at the c7 'Warblehead Dump" for many years without any significant effects being I I„ noted. The area has been designated by Environmental Protection Agency as an ocean disposal site. It is also a site being studied under the ongoing Disposal Area Monitoring System program. No significant adverse impacts on water quality or marine resources at the disposal site are anticipated. I^ 4) Hater quality will be temporarily degraded at the dredge site during the work. However, once completed it should rapidly return to normal. •� g. We have applied the criteria for the Evaluation of Permit Applications for ocean dumping of materials, 40 CFR Part 227, and we also find the material suitable for disposal at the Marblehead Dump site. 6. I have considered all factors affecting the public interest including conservation, ' economics, aesthetics, general environmental concerns, historic values, fish and wild- life values, flood damage protection, land use classifications, navigation, recreation, water supply, water quality, public safety, energy needs, food production, and in general, the needs and welfare of the people. After weighing favorable and unfavorable effects , as discussed in the Environmental Assessment, I find it in the public interest to issue this permit. Y�^' ISION Et1CINEER DATE k :. -2 i E - SNVISOHMENUL ASSESSMENT 1, Applicants Maes. D.E.Q.B, (Division of Waterways) t, Application Numbers 26-80-423 f� 2. Charactar, -location.anO pyrpose of work{to: dredge a channel and basin 1375' long and ranging in width from 4001 to 1000 to -81 mean low water in Palmer Cove, Salem Harbor in Salem, Massachusetts. The material, 40,000 cubic yards of sand and silt will be removed by clamshell or bucket dredge and transported by scows for disposal at the Marblehead Dump Site. 3. Environmental patting; Salem to a highly urbanized, industrial city i. located approximately 16 miles northeast at Hoxton. The site is surrounded by industry and a yacht club. Many crafts are anchored in this harbor. The bottom is mainly sand and silt. 1.h .. D 1 4. Re;atienship to existing uses: maintenance dredging is often performed 1 L� in this area. 5. Possible cumulative•effectss none are anticipated. 6. The attached checklist summarizes the anticipated degree of impact on factors listed, on weighigg the vatious factors, the net environmental effects are considered to be minor. ' 7. A preliminary determination was made that an enviromental impact statement was not required. That determination was re-evaluated in light of later- developments which are addressed in this assessment. I find that based on that initial evaluation and the evaluation of environmental facts set forth above. the decision on the application is not a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. Hence, an environmental impact statement is not required. ' 0 �.• . /hf EOT&8r D ON ENCINW DATE a i S` ',ry � •'jam �� ♦ �Sh:.::y4:�;:::::.. .F F•...i: .frr.' �:-E .. �'r�YT: leime pOHaTH ON PDBLIC YNt�BliTAOTOy 4 bwtleisi Also ",0'H4elyei� .Eilsee .. ..;:. . _•{ ��TT��eHr gwutq Us. �0. ry:H@4do tlands tion Patter" , Air quality 1i M.,.ie,tlon �sathie riosa 6 fauna ,D„HraaioMAccrstaA Heine ;: �oppgH � �t 0 Load Qaa Cleuitiation meatety '6'Eaonosioa aorsationo�hter Supply �. Wetice torieal0 ldod Production HpAMTION OF AP18blSD PUMIC nM=T PAOTOHB+ ANTIMAT® BPPSOT + Besefieial + AMR Adverse - CONNSNT r ` : 0.1 Water Quality - - mater quality will be degraded during construction. L? Navigation + This project will allow for.paesage and berthing Recreation + of vessels, both wimercial and recreational. CD i i t 1 I M O.A M.I..W. MO kiSAI f EXISTING, f•RMNO •► ' � atsn�td �1 LIMITS OR 1 • LOCO• -OA ML.W DREQOINO • rIII •vr (OROOOIN6 LfMM L _._._.—_1III r 1" VAAIALpLE �I • ' MQlfIZONTAL 1.GOI . 2C Y M P VERTICAL I`•G' Q TRA[EO FROM NO3. cHAR'r*mw? TYPICAL. DREDGE SECTION OAAC117 cLU6 LONG POINT Slam Slam �MMAL MARINE R'f • 1, . wa.a BEdICro WAALLRK M-j-�.o as >I'o HARBOR EL.OM FAI-W -S3 AREA TO 8E DREDGED TOS.O M.L.W. }4! as 1 ea DREDGING' LIMITS s-+•o J 1� • SHOWN IN RED RkPORTED LEDGE - �S,q r 2 � -D.G +-S•S t l ti P•4LMER CDI/E' tSe ' ' MASONRY { PLAN 1 WALL £ D® 1`•900' k ELEVATIONS ARE IN FEET ANTENTHS AEOW PROPOSED HARBOR IMPROVEMENTS D MAINTENANCE DREDGING TH@ PLANE OP MEAN COW WATER. MINUS FIGUI@S PALMER COPE /N SALEM HARBOR INDICATE DEPTHS OELOW THAT SAME PLANE. 4Q0006•Y. OP DREDGE MATERIAL IS TO BE SALEM PLACED IN SCOWS AND DISPOSED OF WITHIN ESSEX COUNTY MASS. THE LIMITS OF THE EXISTING DUMPING 41T8 APPLICATION DF AT 4Z=tS=42"N, TA:9*'•OA'W CZ N. MI. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL OUAUTY ENGINEERING DIAMETER). (FOUL. AREA) COMM OF MASS. — DIVISION OF WATERWAYS JUNE25,1980 SHEET I OF I ROBERT A. BRAMAN CIVIL ENGINEER 9 SURVEYOR I ACC. NO. 05154 WAREHAM,MASS. 1 1 1 i 1 � 1 1 ATTACHMENT B 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' D D 2 3 m z m '. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i I � 1 IIS 1 so�snmsZ ass• ioR /P�Cr.3TRY��; - t9�L 1 - / cerlely, 3hallhrs plorr hoa been prepared/n 9CO141 V/,/ with fhe g� P c�b9acc� �9 ry es mof re viafWns Mlv?cVmlerj (µ ojdeeds of>�P CamrJt ar4fI S• i MAW 4 T• i ". s`ggsr sa ¢� h s y'r N� siz-1, D CO&URT.P6AN. N? eERT. "o 2539 �1briop 1 �4 a 1 514 •�'9�6qu�T tis �.�,: ' 'JI�,�¢�6 iwG�1t+!'��' S 0 3'•e•;'t/c3. dot` b��;A �'e;.rnn, 1I AREA A.s;c.D.CFA IS UNVER LEASE BY PALMER RONG _ •"� '�SQj• .S6.1S *IJV 8 LGVB YAcur'CLUB ING:'PKom. V1.• `� - (r6 Me G/rY'op SALEM DATED. S$ t W A 1 Aur. /0;15180 AREA=3./1>K; 6� ! PLANS ACCOMPANYING PETITION OF PALMER COVE 1 YACHT CLU8,NNL. .T©• 'MAINTAIN WALLS,MAYFL O IOZO d13.. qO IatiFlr q LIFTTRACKS �x wwt3s A.'IJ[) UCtW IMII m7y9 WALLS, DECK9,STkE1CTUR5, s ypm,mpFowatmomofEmuon®cmmto"6,pru; 1 FLOATS AND PILES WPALMER f _nugece ANauss 21.1981 COVE . CITY DF SALE;;, n. / ODMUMIDNEN E53EJt` COC/AITY, MA35. •6410 ENGiNEEN i s. EE flF 1. 1 _ � ��ttsT:sAte►3uuasFO2`RSG/3T,ej�U.SE7 1 c i,-fify the M/.i P/vn hos �P�n J/iP,nO/°c�/» Eo�prb7//f. tvf/h ltJr ' ' 6 P fAslsNe;/�$ri.' � vaias oad/eqv o>/arle o �l�e./vyr�/P�s q- ' OfptA✓S Of J,`rE C'Of7l/1!. o //fdtS: . 1 _.• .r/ -inry'..zaavE.LjFT TRRuc5 1 erui , Et9 1 [a Ni Wa a EXfSTIN6 P/4Es !2"1' C.C.5'3e� N SEGFiO "A ': V• //M=SF7 y /iN: /OFZ lr'-• hz?.EY/i: r WOOO OEU — wim 64" E�4 r I i fo-37CNf = -FStl7L /Z10/d: th 5-Wa " i �i 11I 11 o—.MIW . i{ it r SECT/ON '.B V= I,IN =BFJ: H' /N=/0 FT EX�sTG'bc-cK, , f Or ' EL- /3'.8 HOW" g , ea3D ya_37pNE - mL=0 4`wa�o NHw ft9 Watt EXLSTG.O/IES' l'� S— 0—MUV it 1 5ECA1,141 E LICENSE PLAN NQ 74Iq �Y ODPLdw el fAvim yea d IS"boaft Mom. 144GV9T , 2/;/98/ 0 5 1A urt PLANS ACCOMPANINC PE7/T/ON OFPgLMER Cove trERT YACHT CLUB,/NIT c. Cy OF 0 S to FT. , SAL PM, ESSEX CoUMTy, MA. 3 30.8/_ SHEET 4oF-4- . i aiEEfDs sn osl site 5 NA6s. Fae REG/5TRy (/j E: / cer/i/y MW�'his/'loa�IOJ been 0- WEE +: gtq / p�P rPee� Cbufo m/1y Guifh>be fir I u qc(a�r/i®sy/vI&Vgh-'sa�llt�rOak's F N /749 /9W $ 4 -uX o , 323:23' Al �J� c 9 am �`4•y 4 1 N X32.6 FLagp r � F .M q1 W a t AMl3i1A;i conc,agie N . is °MWIC"AML iAP AL2 '40'ANV io' C _ r s`11t4w �® 4 PLUS 1.3.sp''.f'j F ex+sTlu4- TKAVEX 33r Nr= SrEFL s 8. ,; 76 F2d�FLOR1' 12-db r2E FLgAT3' 2t O v nrWSoo G 5-00100 , 517 SO �_ EIIIST/Nb 3U�Ob0�IL$3 S.�/ _SRLE�� quell"sT jI,/92!� .MLN/•Z.o•0• • - .•� Lty of UCENSE PLAN NO.7z/a B ' �_ ��5'__ et Eaaimr. ffi tneeri� A IEWST/NG CONC/2' 7E GYHLK 'PLS fJ`,$�cE4_ AN7NG ,.;7fZrT1-rraAI`0F PACNLE/2 C'ivs 0/o 20 40 80. 1W FT. I YAcNT CLUB /kIG, GZY'OF StA[E: 11N=40tT- `SALEM._ESSEX COU 33Od/ 5HB8T2a-* FO e RE(,/Sr/Zy U JS6: ' �Oi®6as>IT..e� 113L /half1iis omha. hr r7 ' - - prepored n ca b may U h Ike rules ,7 rot/a raor3 �f3'�ie Resjisfirs alarm 5 of-/& comm. of/ a65. t Oo B Al 17 4979 w 323,23'' I 32x/¢ FtOA7I 7'-,60 -B x2p'jr/ogs^� I . Xrs�aaesFCQen—�_.LJ .2-5t205 FLOATS L77T 1 ' I } 2 � o ltJDdtdYTES L4Gi7'dOW o Qf &rA*TIAtz WMO,*gA 14 T 4k. a w 7- 8. + toA 5 2-S 126' -EXISTING-JtIAW P, FLOATS ' I I. I 50>3.l!O 5 V0.0, B �{ °`y IiCENS�PLC'NAN W0:7, _ t �om�e ly awUnHi a,�vmnc�nrz�Iloan4r�iiiiiMF $o `or'8`S' ` e"x �d` �td�o8 c�accu e � ,'°'�r9,I,•�w-EX/J'TINGrD?dNE.R�PyIZAP�,HN NlCT^=�.::..w .rwP•.' ��Ex7�T/HG Ca1vC[ET6.- .W Aix —�- FLAUS.. ACCOMPANING_ p/020 40 Bo /40 Ft PETITION OF PALMER COVE ' YAr-'W-T. CLUB MC Cirr6, FCALE Cy /W ",rr. 5AZEM ESSEX CDL/UT.Y_ . 3. 0�L 51vEET3OF'o 1 APR. -g7 02 (NION) 09:50 P. 002 rj r r No 2559 �hPIEaB, rPalmer's Cove Yacht Club, Inc. of -- Salem --, in the County of -- Essex-- and commonwealth aforesaid, has applied to the Department of Environmental Protection* for license to rplace and maintain piles and pile-held floats ---------------------- rand has submitted plans of the same; and whereas due notice of said application, and 94 the time and FiaGa fixed. f^_ ' ^ thereon, has r been given, as required by law, to the -- Mayor & City council of the City -- of -- Salem. ------------------------------------- - Now, said Department, having heard all parties desiring to be heard, and having fully considered said application, hereby, subject to the approval of the Governor, authorizes and licenses the said ---------------------- 1 Palmer's Cove Yacht Club, Inc. -- subject to the provisions of the ninety-first chapter of the General Laws, and of all laws which are or may be in force applicable thereto, to -- place and maintain piles and pile-held floats ----------------------------------------- ------------- rin and over the waters of -- Palmer's Cove -- in the -- City -- of -- Salem -- and in accordance with the locations shown and details indicated on the accompanying DEP License Plan No. 2559, (3 sheets) r *Pursuant to Stat. 1989, c. 240, s. 101 , "The Department of Environmental Quality Engineering shall be known as the Department of Environmental Protection, " hereinafter in this document referred to as "the Department" ror "DEP" . r rAPR. -I- 02 (MON) 09!50 P. 003 r r License No. 2559 Page 2 The structures hereby authorized shall be limited to the following use: r to provide a private recreational boating facility. -------------------- Any contract or other agreement for the exclusive use of berths r authorized herein shall have a maximum term of one year and may be renewable upon expiration on an annual basis- ------------------------- r r r r r r r r r r r Duplicate of said plan, number 2559 is on file in the office of said Department, and original of said plan accompanies this License, and is to r be referred to as a part hereof. r UR. -a2' 02INION) 09:50 P. 004 Waterways License No. 2559 Page 3 STANDARD WATERWAYS LICENSE CONDITIONS 1. Acceptance of this waterways License shall constitute an agreement by the Licensee to conform with all terms and conditions stated herein. 2 . This license is granted upon the expressed condition that any and all other applicable authorizations necessitated due to the provisions hereof shall be secured by the Licensee prior to the commencement of any activity or use authorized pursuant to this License. 3 . Any change in use or any substantial structural alteration of any structure or fill authorized herein shall require the issuance by the Department of a new Waterways License in accordance with the provisions and procedures established in Chapter 91 of the Massachusetts General Laws. Any unauthorized substantial change in use or unauthorized ' substantial structural alteration of any structure or fill authorized herein shall render this Waterways License void. 4. This Waterways License shall be revocable by the Department for noncompliance with the terms and conditions set forth herein. This license may be revoked after the Department has given written notice of the alleged noncompliance to the Licensee and those persons who have ' filed a written request for such notice with the Department and afforded them a reasonable opportunity to correct said noncompliance. Failure to correct said noncompliance after the issuance of a written notice by the Department shall render this Waterways License void and the Commonwealth may proceed to remove or cause removal of any structure or fill authorized herein at the expense of the Licensee, its successors and assigns as an unauthorized and unlawful structure and/or fill. 5. The structures and/or fill authorized herein shall be maintained in good repair and in accordance with the terms and conditions stated herein and the details indicated on the accompanying license plans. 6. Nothing in this Waterways License shall be construed as authorizing encroachment in, on or over property not owned or controlled by the. Licensee, except with the written consent of the owner or owners thereof. ' 7 . This Waterways License is granted subject to all applicable Federal, State, County, and Municipal laws, ordinances and regulations including but not limited to a valid final Order of Conditions issued pursuant to the Wetlands Protection Act, G.L. Chapter 131, s.40, S . This waterways License is granted upon the express condition that the use of the structures and/or fill authorized hereby shall be in strict conformance with all applicable requirements and authorizations of the DEP Division of Water Pollution Control. APR. -22' 02 NON) 09:50 P, 005 r License No. 2559 Page 4 ' The amount of tide-water displaced by the work hereby authorized has been r ascertained by said Department, and compensation thereof has been made by the said -- Palmer's Cove Yacht Club, Inc. -- by paying into the treasury , of the Commonwealth -- two dollars and zero cents ($2 . 00) -- for each cubic yard so displaced, being the amount hereby assessed by the said Department. (15 cu. yds. _ $30.00) --------------------------------- Nothing in this License shall be construed as to impair the legal rights r of any person. This License shall be void unless the same and the accompanying plans are r recorded within 60 days from the date hereof, in the Registry of Deeds for the -- Southern -- District of the County of -- Essex. ------------- IN WITNESS WHEREAS, said Department of Environmental Protection have hereunto set their hands this fifreentli day of February in the year nineteen hundred and ninety one. r commissioner _ r c6- Department of Director Environmental Protection Section Chief �1 _ THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS r r This License is approved in consideration of the payment into the treasury of the Commonwealth by the said -- Palmer 's Cove Yacht Club, Inc. ------------------------------------------------------------------- of the further sum of -- eleven thousand, seven hundred, fifty-eight dollars and zero cents ($11,758 . 00) ------------------------------------- r the amount determined by the Governor as a just and equitable charge for ' rights and privileges hereby granted in the land of the Commonwealth. BOSTON Approved by t3�GDart Ia&Acat.�iw---�- rGovernor S SCALE IN FEET g_ly�� AREA 13Y ano0 9 U•S.CORPS OFAWY + �_:3 ENGINEERS, 19G8 a g Als uu ,+. 1 tl R r_ ��: f�' OhALEK4�• - 0 C35HADED AREAS $ y N RIP NSE INDICATE EX8PANSION \ _ TRU #597 ` 4 cx PROPERTY pRSTEE5 OF SHETLAND M . N. W . OPERTIES 157 ' 29 CONGRi _55 5T SALEM, MA . / 2031 =•-� 3 PROPERTY ~ r P,4 LINE I `� ate-, ��SYAFLT R S Jr --�! wQg� - ,` 4FM�Prs�9 F 177 ' 403 0oQ:D i Ekes 20 ' � z_j z �v >4s�NOC/ z�°3� � z UR Lu a 0 4 e - �- 5 O tL <Q Q M E T z q m E 0 A jr/'Q�� < � 1 :16 ' 2'� �-�o 0—'�?6 9 Qzu _j ? o z 9OQYgyOR ' o PROPERTY CITY OF SALEM w�LL -M . H . W z �. 93 WA5>31NGTOW ST SALEM,MA. 0 N S oor D& FEB 15 1991 PALMER S COVE "' r' 0 YACHT CLUB , INC . CSA;.EA";` SALEM, MA . ° ° RIP-RAP �ZG' ❑ PILES ADDED TRU ® 183 ' o EXISTING p SHAD D SHETLAND PROPERTYAREA Mi . H . W . INDIC TE 50 0 100 157 ' EXPA SIGN i SCALE IN FEET LEVITT PROPERTY 3TREET LINE M . L . W . COME �o �IS ING CLUB 177 BUIL IN S & RAMP �—�^{ �--- 20 1 Dow i \ rr THERIAULT 116 ,-2 —� ' �-a--= o � >I o- � '9 M . L . W . S . PROPERTY PROPERTY �WALLV\-M . H . W , CITY OF SALEM 0 0 J SHEET 2 OF 2 it � LICENSE PLAN N0. 2SS1 <� nFTiPl�s ti e y O by mow►of B*Gm MW P� a nu FEB 15 199i � z i a w cn MAIN FLOAT FINGER FLOAT a 0 m 1 r r r 1 ATTACHMENT C 1 r r r r 1 r r r r 1 y ■ D O m z n r M � � � � 1 1 1 i N 1 i i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r Commonwealth ofMassachusetts -CN Division of Marine Fisheries 30 Emerson Ave. Gloucester, MA 01930 David E.C*Pierce (617)727-3336 IV�!I Director fax (617)727-3337 Charles D. Baker Governor Karyn E. Polito March 18,2016 Lieutenant Governor Matthew A.Beaton Secretary Salem Conservation Commission George N.Peterson,Jr. Cmmnissioner Salem City Hall Mary-Lee King Attn:Tom Devine tdevinegsalem.com Deputy Commissioner 93 Washington Street Salem,MA 01970 Dear Commissioners: ' The Division of Marine Fisheries(MarineFisheries)has reviewed the supplemental information dated 2/29/16 provided by GFS,Inc.regarding the Notice of Intent for Palmers Cove Yacht Club for the dredging,reconfiguration and approval of unpermitted structures at 78 Leavitt Street in Salem. We offer the following comments: • We agree with the proposed modification of the dredge depth in the northwest corner. According to the 2/29/16 letter,dredging to-8.0 to the first 16 feet off the float corner, and then using a 3:1 slope will reduce approximately 800sf of intertidal conversion to subtidal. We appreciate the effort the applicant has made to reduce intertidal impacts. • Regarding the end float to Dinghy Tie Up and Witch's Way that grounds at low tide,one of the proposed modifications(either rotation or shortening of float)should be employed to ensure all floats remain at least 18"off the mudflat at any tide post-dredging. If this recommendation cannot be satisfied,the applicant should utilize piles with float stops or skids to minimize grounding. • The only dredging proposed in the access channel is near the marina basin,at least 250 feet from the 1995 DEP eelgrass layer.It is highly unlikely that eelgrass exists in the marina basin or westernmost portion of the channel based on DEP maps and site assessments we have conducted nearby in the last several years.However,eelgrass does exist along the eastern portion of the I channel based on a field visit in September 2013 for an adjacent project. We do not require an eelgrass survey if dredging will be limited to the westernmost portion of the channel. • We understand the request to apply for the entire dredge footprint to preserve the right to maintenance dredge in the future. We request the actual dredge limits be shown on the plan,and the applicant address how they will guide contractors to dredge only the areas discussed above. • Our shellfish biologists have recently updated their review policy regarding the request for a shellfish survey. At this time, we offer that the applicant can use historic survey data in lieu of performing their own survey. If the applicant still wishes to conduct their own survey,results will be compared to historic data and the higher number will be used in the mitigation formula. 1of3 • If the applicant would like DMF to perform the mitigation seeding as part of ongoing enhancement work, see Attachment A for a breakdown of cost.Alternatively,the applicant is welcome to utilize a private entity, in which case we would request a written seeding plan. Seeding cannot occur in Salem Harbor or any other mudflats currently closed to shellfishing for public safety concerns. i Rather,the nearest conditionally restricted or open flat should be used(i.e. in-kind but out-of- place). Out-of-kind mitigation can be considered on a case by case basis. • The above mitigation is for the loss of the shellfish resource only.To mitigate for loss of habitat, this project may be suitable for the In Lieu Fee program for any intertidal areas above MLW converted to subtidal.This component of mitigation will be addressed in the Army Corps permitting process. • The previously recommended TOY'S still apply. Thank you for considering our comments. Feel free to contact me with any questions about this review at 978-282-0308 x108 orjill ian.carr nstate.ma.us. Sincerely, r Jillian Carr i Fisheries Habitat Specialist and Technical Reviewer Cc: Luke Fabbri,GFS Inc. Iafabbri.9fs(Z0otmail.com Tay Evans,Jeff Kennedy,Devon Winkler DMF References i Chase BC,PlouffJH and Castonguay WM(2002)The Marine Resources of Salem Sound, 1997. Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Technical Report TR-6. r i L 2 of i 1 r r APPENDIX A MarineFisheries has calculated impacts to the local soft-shell clam resource from the Palmer Cove Yacht Club dredging activities above MLLW at a total of 737 clams(see formula below)using a local historic density of.08 clams per square-foot(Chase et al 2002)and a survival success rate from the Pines River, where MarineFisheries will be planting clams in 2016.The smallest nets that MarineFisheries will be planting will be 300 square-feet, seeded with a total of 9000 seed clams, at a total cost of$354.04 (calculation below). One net in two years time is expected to adequately compensate for the lost resource at Palmer Cove Yacht Club. Mitigation will be"in-kind"but"out-of-place",reinforcing the notion that impacts should always be minimized at the impact site before mitigation is considered due to net local loss. Area Planting Impacted density Survival Outplant (sq ft) clams/sq ft (decimal) clams 3687 0.08 0.4 737 Cost of materials for one 300 ft'net Shade cloth(32' length) $83.84 Floats(10) $11.00 Zipties(20) $1.20 Seed(9000) $198.00 $294.04 Labor for construction,install,removal of one net Salem State Student Labor $60.00 Total cost for Palmer Cove $354.04 1 r r 3of3 dw/JC 3.18.16 r 4of3 GFSGEOLOGICAL FIELD SERVICES, INC. February 29, 2016 ' Commonwealth of Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Ms. Jillian Carr 30 Emerson Avenue Gloucester, MA 01930 RE: Palmers Cove Yacht Club Dredging Project Dear Ms. Carr: On December 9, 2015,the Division of Marine Fisheries (DMF)provided a comment letter regarding the proposed Maintenance Dredging of the above referenced project. A copy of DFM's letter is attached. Geological Field Services, Inc. has collected the additional data and edited the appropriate plan in order to prepare the following response to DMF's comments. Please be advised that these plan changes and additional information will be used when making the necessary Army Corps and Chapter 91 permit application. The following comments have been organized in order that DMF presented them. Dredge Footprint and Design The proposed footprint includes dredging of intertidal areas that were approved under some,but not all, previous approvals (i.e.west of the lift approved only in 1946,east of the lift only 1954, southwest corner only 1980).The dredging of these intertidal areas does not appear to be critical to the current function of the marina,especially considering the western limit of the reconfiguration zone is proposed to be pushed seaward,which would reduce the intertidal areas that fall within the zone. We request a narrative describing the need for dredging in the intertidal,square footage of intertidal impacts,and alternatives considered that would avoid these areas. The total"Maintenance Dredge Footprint"represents that cumulative area that the City of Salem, MADEP MADPW have dredge in the past. The"Maintenance Dredge Footprint"is different than the Reconfiguration zone. The Reconfiguration zone is the envelope in which structures can be minimally moved around without full reapplication. It is meant to accommodate minor alterations that occur over time at most marinas. Figure 1 illustrates the intertidal areas that overlap the Maintenance Dredge Footprint. The overlaps occur in the southwest corner and the northwest corner. In the southwest corner there are 466 ft between above MLW and 645 ft' above MLLW. In the northwest corner there are 2,649 ft2 between above MLW and 3,042 ftz above MLLW. The southwest corner of the Maintenance Dredge Footprint is a critical access point for boat leaving and returning to the west side of the Main Street and Wall Street piers. There are 43 slips along the western edge that cannot be accessed without keeping the southwest corner dredged. The material to be dredged has accumulated on the sea wall constructed by the City of Salem in 1941. Care will be taken not to damage the seawall and the side slope will parallel the slope of the sea wall. Attached is the Chapter 91 14 Hubon Street, Salem,Massachusetts 01970 Tel: (978) 594-1376 GFSGEOLOGICAL FIELD SERVICES, INC. plan for that sea wall in 1941 as Figures 2 and 3. Photo 1 shows the western edge of the marina looking from the northwest corner at the gangway and Photo 2 shows the southwest intertidal area. All of the photographs presented were taken on December 23,2015 at dead low on a-1.0 foot tide. A shellfish resource assessment will be conducted in the southwest corner of the Maintenance Dredge Footprint to determine the presence of shellfish. In the northwest corner of the Maintenance Dredge Footprint is where the main gangway accesses the marina,the travel lift is located and the gangway to the Dinghy Tie up and Witch Way Piers are located. Currently the floats that receive the gangways touch bottom at MLW. This is causing the floats to rack and list as shown on Photos 3 and 4. The corner of the Maintenance Dredge Footprint is approximately 60 feet from the closest comer of the float. To minimize the extent of intertidal dredging the full dredge depth of-8.0 could be limited to 16 feet off the float comer and then using a 3:1 slope pinch out into the corner. That would reduce the distance to 30 feet instead of 60 feet and save approximately 800 ft'of intertidal dredging.A shellfish resource assessment will be conducted in the northwest comer of the Maintenance Dredge Footprint to determine the presence of shellfish. On the opposite side of the travel lift the end float that services the gangway to the Dinghy Tie Up and I Witch Way Piers grounds at MLW (see Photo 4). The length of this float could be shortened by 4 feet but it will still ground unless the Maintenance Dredge Footprint is dredged in this area which includes the mouth of the travel lift area. The entire Dinghy Tie-up and Dinghy Rack assemble could also be rotated out slightly holding the pile at the junction of the Dinghy Tie-up and Witch Way in its current location. The Club would still need to dredge but it would give move distance between the bottom of the floats and the mud at low tide. We request that Low Low Water be shown on the plan. We have shown Mean Low Low Water on the site plan,Figure 4, and have calculated intertidal areas using both MLW and MLLW. The difference between MLW and MLLW is 0.33'. This plan will be used when applying for the Army Corps and Chapter 91 licenses. The side slopes shown in the sections of Figure 4 will be very steep after a-8ft MLW dredge.We request the applicant address the stability of side slopes throughout the dredge area. All side slopes will be 2:1 to 3:1 slopes. The permit plan has been corrected. This plan will be used when applying for the Army Corps and Chapter 91 licenses. We recommend the use of an environmental bucket. An Environmental bucket was proposed and will be used. Proper siltation control is critical. If bottom-weighted silt curtains or other barriers appear to be ineffective in the containment of turbidity,work should cease and additional measures should be taken. A water quality monitoring plan will be prepared for MADEP's 401 Water Quality Certification- Unpermitted Structures The currently unpermitted structures result in 822sf of impact area,not including the 4,056sf of Section 10A structures under review(Breakwater and Witch Way docks).The primary impact of 14 Hubon Street, Salem, Massachusetts 01970 , Tel: (978) 594-1376 ' GFS GEOLOGICAL FIELD SERVICES, INC. these structures is shading. Some portions of structures appear to be in shallow water,where grounding may also be a concern. The Dinghy Rack is the only unpermitted structure. It is 608 square feet and consists of 3 8x20 foot floats and one 8x16 foot float. The Dingy Rack is just at the mud level at MLW. Photo 5 shows the Dinghy Rack at-1.0 feet. The Dinghy Rack is within the Maintenance Dredge Footprint and dredging will prevent future grounding. Also if the Dinghy Tie-up was rotated out as discussed above there would be more clearance at low tides. Witch Way and the Breakwater are a total of 4160 sf Neither structure ground and at MLW are greater than 2 feet off the current bottom. The unpermitted "Dingy Rack" dock array sits adjacent to the MLW line.The applicant should provide additional information about this structure,including depth dimensions and the height off the seafloor.If this structure grounds at any tide,or allows vessels to ground or prop dredge while tied up or in transit,this structure should be relocated to deeper water. The Dingy Rack is 22"thick and it does just touch the mud flats at MLW. The structure could be rotated out several feet as discussed above to avoid grounding but there still needs to be some dredging in this area. There are no vessels tied to the Dinghy Rack and the dinghies that are placed on the rack do not have motors. So there is no "prop dredging"taking place. The Break Water and Witch Way are 22"thick. It does not ground at MLW and is greater than 18"off the bottom at its closest edge. The applicant should address the same issues above for the"Main Street"end float near the lift, which also sits along MLW, and the breakwater which sits in approximately 2.8' based on the plan. Structures should not be allowed to ground at any tide,and we generally recommend at least 18" between the bottom-most part of a structure and the seafloor at the lowest tide. Please see above discussion of the"Main Street"end float near the lift. The applicant should clarify if the Witch Way docks and Breakwater are proposed to become permanent structures as opposed to their current seasonal nature.If permanency is proposed,we recommend the use of lower-impact options for anchors,such as piles with float stops(if risk of grounding)or flexible rode moorings as opposed to traditional chains. Witch Way and the Breakwater are proposed to be become permanent structures to be held in place with piles. The Club would like to stop having to move these structures in and out and resetting the anchors each season. Finish and Shellfish A shellfish survey should be performed in all areas above MLLW within the work footprint to quantify potential impacts. As previously stated PCYC MLLW has been put on the site plan and the intertidal areas have been calculated to total 3,115 ft' above MLW and 3,687 ft' above MLLW. A shellfish resource assessment will t be conducted in the southwest and northwest comers of the Maintenance Dredge Footprint to determine the presence of shellfish. 14 Hubon Street, Salem,Massachusetts 01970 Tel: (978) 594-1376 GFSGEOLOGICAL FIELD SERVICES, INC. We recommend a time of year restriction for in-water,silt-producing work from February 15 to ' June 30 to protect spawning winter flounder and eggs. The Club agrees with the time of year restrictions We recommend a time of year restriction for in-water,silt-producing work from May 1 to September 30 to protect spawning and settling shellfish resources from siltation. The Club agrees with the time of year restrictions Eelgrass An eelgrass survey is needed throughout the project site and within at least 100 feet of the project footprint,including but not limited to the pockets of grass mapped by DEP at the mouth of the channel. , The project footprint has been plotted on the MassGIS overlay showing the 1995 eelgrass extent. DMF was concerned that the project was in potential eelgrass areas mapped in 1995.No dredging is proposed in the majority of the access channel. The only dredging proposed in the access channel is near the marina basin. A 300-foot radius has been drawn around the eastern extent of the proposed dredging. The 300-foot radius clips the 1995-eelgrass beds in two locations. The closest the proposed project comes is approximately 250 feet. Please be advised that not all of the Maintenance Dredge Footprint is proposed to be dredged. The Maintenance Dredge Footprint is shown in it entirety to preserved the right to maintenance dredge in the future. In our opinion and eelgrass survey is not necessary for the proposed dredge project. In-water,silt-producing work should not take place within 100 feet of any eelgrass. No dredging is proposed within 100 feet of any eelgrass Depending on survey results and proximity of eelgrass,a monitoring plan may be necessary. An eelgrass monitoring plan is not believed to be necessary using a 100' setback as a protective distance. Please be advised that these responses will be provided to DMF in advance of the Army and Chapter 91 permitting process. Please contact me with any questions. Sincerely, GEOLOGICAL FIELD SERVICES, INC. Luke Fabbri r 14 Hubon Street, Salem,Massachusetts 01970 Tel: (978) 594-1376 �y Commonwealth ofMassachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries �. 30 Emerson Ave. Gloucester, MA 01930 David E.Pierce (617)727-3336 If Director fax (617)727-3337 Charles D.Baker Governor Karyn E.Polito Lieutenant Governor December 9,2015 Matthew A.Beaton Secretary Salem Conservation Commission George N. Peterson,Jr. I Commissioner Salem City Hall Mary-Lee King Attn: Tom Devine tdevine2( salem.com Deputy Commissioner 93 Washington Street Salem,MA 01970 Dear Commissioners: The Division of Marine Fisheries(MarineFisheries)has reviewed the Notice of Intent submitted by Palmers Cove Yacht Club Inc for the dredging, reconfiguration and approval of unpermitted structures at 78 Leavitt Street in Salem.Dredging will remove 25,000 cubic yards of intertidal and subtidal material to -811 MLW and dispose of it at an aquatic disposal site, if approved.The dredge impact area is approximately 288,840sf including 203,115sf in the marina basin and 85,725sf in the access channel that extends to the east of the basin. The proposed dredge footprint combines the footprints of several previous dredge approvals, including those from 1946, 1954 and 1980. Additional work proposed on site includes reconfiguration of the marina zone to include an existing seasonal breakwater. The breakwater(roughly 120' long)and"Witch Way" (roughly 300' long)are requested for approval to retain unpermitted structures, as are several unpermitted floats that currently exist onsite. Salem Harbor provides essential forage habitat for a variety of fish and invertebrate species including but not limited to alewife(Alosa pseudoharengus),blueback herring(A1osa aestivalis),rainbow smelt (Osmerus mordax),American eel (Anguilla rostrata),white perch(Marone americana),Atlantic tomcod (Microgadus tomcod),Atlantic cod(Gadus morhua) and American lobster(Homarus americanus). It is also habitat for the forage, spawning,and early development of winter flounder(Pseudopleuronectes americanus). The project site contains both intertidal and subtidal habitats which are likely utilized by the above listed species for various life stages and behaviors, including spawning, egg and juvenile development, foraging activity and migratory transit.Furthermore,a shellfish suitability polygon, the State's formal shellfish habitat designation, is present within and adjacent to the project site. Soft shell clams(Mya arenaria), blue mussels(Mytilus edulis) and quahog(Mercenaria mercenaria)may exist in the intertidal area within and/or adjacent to the work area. Since the shellfish suitability polygons have a coarse resolution,delineated areas should be used only as a guide to the approximate location of shellfish habitat. The site is in Classification Area N 18.1 and is prohibited from the harvest of shellfish. Even though harvest is not permitted in this location,the resource should be protected to avoid losing the multitude of ecosystem-wide functions and benefits that shellfish serve. Eelgrass(Zostera marina)is mapped by DEP immediately adjacent to the project site.It is unclear if eelgrass is mapped within the project footprint since the plans do not include DEP's eelgrass boundaries. A large, expansive meadow was mapped in the area in 1995,and was reduced to smaller pocket meadows in 2006 and 2012 along the eastern portion of the channel. According to DEP, Salem Harbor lost 70%of its eelgrass in the period between 1996 and 2006'.The drastic decline in eelgrass coverage is thought to be a result of increasingly poor water quality and highly organic sediments.The relatively small patches of eelgrass remaining in Salem Harbor have persisted but are likely stressed. Any additional stress and increased turbidity could be too much for the grass to withstand.Dredge work may not only increase turbidity and potentially bury eelgrass,but may also stir up organic,fine grain sediment that can result in 1 increased suspended nutrients and declines in dissolved oxygen. This may stress eelgrass even outside of , the dredge footprint. The patches near the project area may be some of the last remaining patches of eelgrass in Salem Harbor,the loss of which could cause substantial changes to the harbor's ecology. Given the importance of eelgrass as fisheries habitat and its regulatory status as a Special Aquatic Site(Clean Water Act 404(b) (1)),all efforts should be made to avoid and minimize impacts. Based on recent Google and USGS aerial photography,dark patches can be seen throughout the area, extending beyond the 2012 DEP eelgrass layer. Since DEP's eelgrass layer is of course resolution and only intended for use as a guide, eelgrass presence or absence cannot be accurately determined without a survey. Our recommendations are as follows: Dredge Footprint and Design • The proposed footprint includes dredging of intertidal areas that were approved under some,but not all,previous approvals(i.e.west of the lift approved only in 1946, east of the lift only 1954, southwest comer only 1980). The dredging of these intertidal areas does not appear to be critical to r the current function of the marina, especially considering the western limit of the reconfiguration zone is proposed to be pushed seaward,which would reduce the intertidal areas that fall within the zone. We request a narrative describing the need for dredging in the intertidal, square footage of r intertidal impacts, and alternatives considered that would avoid these areas. • We request that Low Low Water be shown on the plan. • The side slopes shown in the sections of Figure 4 will be very steep after a-811 MLW dredge. We request the applicant address the stability of side slopes throughout the dredge area. • We recommend the use of an environmental bucket. • Proper siltation control is critical. If bottom-weighted silt curtains or other barriers appear to be ineffective in the containment of turbidity,work should cease and additional measures should be taken. Unpermitted Structures • The currently unpermitted structures result in 822sf of impact area,not including the 4,056sf of Section 10A structures under review(Breakwater and Witch Way docks). The primary impact of these structures is shading. Some portions of structures appear to be in shallow water, where grounding may also be a concern. " • The unpermitted"Dingy Rack"dock array sits adjacent to the MLW line. The applicant should provide additional information about this structure, including depth dimensions and the height off the seafloor.If this structure grounds at any tide,or allows vessels to ground or prop dredge while tied up or in transit,this structure should be relocated to deeper water. • The applicant should address the same issues above for the"Main Street"end float near the lift, which also sits along MLW,and the breakwater which sits in approximately 2.8' based on the plan. Structures should not be allowed to ground at any tide,and we generally recommend at least 18" between the bottom-most part of a structure and the seafloor at the lowest tide. • The applicant should clarify if the Witch Way docks and Breakwater are proposed to become permanent structures as opposed to their current seasonal nature.If permanency is proposed,we recommend the use of lower-impact options for anchors, such as piles with float stops(if risk of grounding)or flexible rode moorings as opposed to traditional chains. Finfish and Shellfish • A shellfish survey should be performed in all areas above LLW within the work footprint to quantify potential impacts. • We recommend a time of year restriction for in-water,silt-producing work from February 15 to , June 30 to protect spawning winter flounder and eggs. • We recommend a time of year restriction for in-water,silt-producing work from May 1 to September 30 to protect spawning and settling shellfish resources from siltation. • Loss of intertidal or subtidal habitats or fisheries resources may require mitigation by permitting agencies. Eel ass • An eelgrass survey is needed throughout the project site and within at least 100 feet of the project footprint,including but not limited to the pockets of grass mapped by DEP at the mouth of the channel. r • In-water, silt-producing work should not take place within 100 feet of any eelgrass. • Depending on survey results and proximity of eelgrass,a monitoring plan may be necessary. Thank you for considering our comments. Feel free to contact me with any questions about this review at 978-282-0308 x108 or iillian.carrastate.ma.us. Sincerely, r Jillian Carr Fisheries Habitat Specialist and Technical Reviewer Cc: Luke Fabbri,GFS Inc. Iafabbri.Qfs(ahotmail.com Alison Verkade,NMFS Tay Evans,Kathryn Ford,Dave Roach,Devon Winkler DMF References 1 Costello CT, Kenworthy WJ(20 10)Twelve year mapping and change analysis of eelgrass(Zostera marina) distribution in Massachusetts(USA)identifies state wide decline. Estuaries and Coasts. r i O F-rj � C1,i � � No F-11 � o I� � � � � z lb3 SHEET 1 Of 2 SHEETS YI w9 N JU1.1{fLIULII �J. y K mo I � 0 L u u ^ 9co i000 2 LL LEAVIT7 ST, � Yn�es � LO K ' i'ftCN uS.C.-U.S.CitiART Na 240 w y I 1��Charies Theria:,ii �0_ea.i+i St. J , rr 1 ,a j a Q1 �a cL• 22ttd 1 3 Z � CITY OF SA'-EM a � See Pe i!Wc.1492 De?t rLb lc WorKy � 1 Fo.P- .Tri 5aWhead 4 F-Jj 0 n L LAfAYETTE PL 40;� V Q . LEACH ST. d e o Scr�le �9� "�eccF. St. ' a m G (sl E PLAN ACCOMPANYING PETITION Of NO. 2219 -APPROVED BY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS CITY Of SALEM JAJY 31, 1940 ;mak"' FOR RIPRAP FILL $ PIER `> '-. PALMERS COVE -- Assn SALEM, MASS. ___ wR;cY^'R SiaN CITY EN61NElR —S —L a eR+wve �J ------- ------ 'rop_Lf pidewalM_Fill :,�ev_U--- V H.W Elev,.'-).O BLiWhead Elev 6.0 M.L.W. Elev. 0 PROFILE Huj� ,)Coles in ver. 15.0 F'�' T............ Flout i6z24 T MHW .o Ri pllp C—e�'t— M—LA-0 0 I END SECTION pfjes not les.thon 'mt 0 LiCENSF PLAN NO.2219 ELEVATION APPROVED JULY 31, 1940 i V In LEGEND 0.yl 4N x J 1113 jr 6 I rE a �ry l � K a ra: ou.uu.u� f N y°0 wre Rl3vislons� w °tom` 3,1 .. a crRew.Pores I1 � ��w fP U m � a r ° _• d,,.�a...° mun c src uxEvu xor�n. y m4 K,U': F k .hw..moo..uuu.aur�..0 uuruu a m PALMER COVE 5,� � v N y r �aur�mwnuw. YACHT CLUB, INC 74 LEAVITT STREET SALEM. MA Iw ST'y it E%ISING 1'. $ ®e •PeLY6R'S COV£ ^"�"a'�a�.O1O�aw� BAIH1METRIC s ZEE HARBOR dmuimvw CONDJTON5 GRAPHIC SCALE 'Ql�eg ""'w} wrKunruwnwrcwcm� K.i., •. I A �rtr.r� Scyyl.M 11 A EIGURE mm 2 .p. .ou u..rA„uu.um.u� �crrn�ha 10 u.. F 6 0_ _.lIM) a . ... . ~ _ • 1v [ia .... .�. ._... _... ...1. 1 ..... . �_ .• 1 .. r.e u.w w R .... .- _ --_. .. .. .. ... ..., . ... .— ----------------------------- .— N.F�N.Low qE_q. woo 1+00 z.o0 z+a0 .+00 e.00 0+w )wo a+o0 a.a0 1ow0 11+00 10 SECTION A-A ' 5cale: Ho.zantal 1'=.0' > > Vertical - 1' 4' --"- Ra - s 0 ... j -° m ReN3Jons� GRAPHIC SCALE f0 leml 1u-u n 13.W 1A1o0 1MW 1N15 10 10 E� t W) 10 lI. ° b=ac mxa a.m ,1. ° Griffin r.. w< uo I ._ sra.a_,mi mc w.wr t r 3 a PALTER COVE • =ao ,, . --•- - a'z' 1. -• YACHT CLUB, INC n� O". 74 LEAVITT STREET ° \t' .... s ...n 'i 11'-e SALEM. MA ... .....L. . . ...... w.rc ... y .... -.r:... i. 0 0 CROSS-SEC110N5 0.00 v0o z«o0 woo 1wa z+m s.w .+oa »ao smarm SECTION B-B - ACCESS CHANNEL SECTION C-C - MARINA BASIN ,yy. FIGURE 5colo: Horizontal - 1'=40' scale: Hori:oatal - 1'=40' gpe. 4 Verliool - I' - 4' Vortical -1' s 4 4pe11py5f too mmr resaa�oe, �'�i a I y�j PROPOSED E MAINTENANCE am 'syi`Y DREDGE AR 1" 7 EA 1 —120" LRAVLjTf�( StRCST �i A WA �. ',p £� .ail s CCCIII frfrfr Ls ,s,o..m-A N nrry G i f I i s �• �w W f G m nl a.ma p �' — 7 Revisions ° a R .. 1 1 "Ax ca t � ss �Ar� - • Griffin s\ a ye 43 n r ED g'i74nq 4e nom»,.�R n� �E� i� .. 9 ,w � � da.i p�( .00�., •+m aA n21LIN rt«� �j., tet &N O - PALTER COVE Ei\ t ? • E� p # I YACHT CLUB, INC @D R� i A 74 LEALEM STREET SALEM, MA PROPOSED �y _ _ _ ®, viw uwmurv[[pamv rmrvrtw, MAINTENANCE FALYER'S COVE SALSYR..RN DREDGE FOOTPRINT Ag GRPPHIC 5CAL6 A� � yq �y Aeu ' smm:r-m ..w„ FIGURE n �Isi�NArs 7 y 4 1 ovrr - �"' g*� 13 I i ,�'""-`"Mb w.�+'� � ,arc '' _ ■��_ J� • .a Axa^ .� 4v�l l \ l f 5 LE' .INHON � as �`„ '� crea�=xic scnLe r� ... + * pw rr' �� .r� l4 i _ tae #`'♦ Y'� ^.�'r�'`'A ,.K, ' �N+a n ��' ^ r+%t ,ald.SF '. tet* ��,r * a., �$'� w�•��,*s�i. wf a �• ` a q ..+ d...'3• w :„�,'�,! .+^ 4.}S�"�",s1�'" ,k 2 r+a 7`K`�i ;lv��' - � YX Y� .h4. ' ' � r� s .i Tvy.. � .Y^r !?w ��l �'�,q• 741 r ,yj 3t�. ti �,F, '.}q.- � ?✓+y;' C'. 3 �wemea'. u _ WA low £:G:`Seaga a ❑ ., 5.., x �-- MIA- V. A. jr t _ �a ^-x zf.. P. ; 'b"-- �t " .,,,yvay¢y '[< '�,2"x s3 ��„`rt ""'..,-.;.T tt "`�eF' a� T,,,; _,,,;°y�^p,,,,. y-;• t Q G. ::,.a ;�3� �. ae5 1.•' $ ,a,s°s'"mss 'xa 1�f �+ y r: '� ccrc 4 r yy nw J r Y i; r ,P }, R t rRti A4 S Shu .W a fig,,.` Y 5 Will Jillw rt 5M' a. '1 d�►s "�= r � -•.a►.�..,s .` .s'NPV:4:5 "1i'� 4^l'`"n�`�..�^ , �as'.�asst �;. � � � �� \` t'•`'d�A`{ )'R,�i �_ � r.. —1^^' �� www*1• - �'� , t tr {- a el r • ' �'b» _. 'r"-`�,--+�.....,�T„r+.�. � ,.o„� yrc.. x I Yrs, da] '.*';y t �x a r � r r — s ��yT� x. ;x9cP F "t •-Ex,+a �.e-Y` 'kY .s .h cwt ttjl f � rat' E I _ -^y ��►{��-f„`_'�11p� '�� `�r�0 '=�T• _ �._.s_e ' k- .s'f..'•�, �,� �- Y, �'._'--�"".`^.s.a'_---'�-_ ' 4F d m- -.r IWO qty,, p r rm N J.#I a a t .``�`� ne v -. .. �, - -�• -� £r.-yr .Y0.�" _ > .may - .,,. yr. - a d 1 1 ATTACHMENT D ' D n 2 3 m ' z 0 1 t 1 1 r r 1 TOXICOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF A PROPOSED DREDGE SEDIMENT: r Palmer's Cove Yacht Club Tier III Sediment Evaluation Salem Harbor, Salem, Massachusetts ' New England District Corps of Engineers Application Number: rGrain Size Distribution Analysis r ' r Prepared For: Geological Field Services, Inc 14 Hubon Street rSalem, Massachusetts 01970 Prepared By: r EnviroSystems, Incorporated One Lafayette Road Hampton, New Hampshire 03842 r Reference 28153 September 2016 ' Page 1 of 6 r TABLE OF CONTENTS ' LABORATORY STANDARDS STATEMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.0 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2.0 SAMPLE COLLECTION, PRESERVATION AND STORAGE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3.0 ANALYSIS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 , 4.0 RESULTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 5.0 REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 ' LIST OF TABLES ' Table 1. Sample Collection and Receipt Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Table 2. Core Description Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 APPENDIXA: SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 r Palmer's Cove Yacht Club Sediment Evaluation. Grain Size Analysis. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Application Number . ESI Study 28153. Page 2 of 6 1 r LABORATORY STANDARDS STATEMENT_ rThis study was performed by EnviroSystems, Incorporated at its facility in Hampton, New Hampshire. EnviroSystems' laboratory is accredited by the State of New Hampshire under the National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation (NELAC)program.All testing conducted by EnviroSystems as part of this program was compliant with NELAC guidelines and standards.Additionally,this study was conducted in accordance with guidelines presented in the 2004 version of the New England District's Regional Implementation Manual r (RIM)for Evaluation of Dredged Material Proposed for Disposal In New England Waters.Any deviations from specific elements of the RIM are detailed in the Protocol Deviation Section of this Report. i 1 rFor EnviroSystems, Inc. � "` October 5 2016 Kenneth A. Simon Date rTechnical Director 1 r r r r r r rPalmer's Cove Yacht Club Sediment Evaluation. Grain Size Analysis. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Application Number . ESI Study 28153. Page 3 of 6 r GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS ' OF A PROPOSED DREDGE SEDIMENT: ' Palmer's Cove Yacht Club, Salem, Massachusetts 1.0 INTRODUCTION ' As part of a comprehensive plan to reduce adverse environmental impacts of ocean dumping,Section 103 of the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 specifies that all sediments to be discharged into ocean waters must be evaluated to define their potential impact on existing benthic communities.The United States Environmental Protection Agency(US EPA)has determined that in order to evaluate the potential impact, the sediment attributes must first be characterized. This project was designed to characterize the sediments from the area of dredging proposed for the Palmer's Cove Yacht Club, located in Salem, Massachusetts. Testing involved completion of grain size analyses following procedures established by the US EPA and the United States Army Corps of Engineers (US ACE) for testing of dredged material. Procedures are presented in Evaluation of Dredged Material ' Proposed for Ocean Disposal (US EPA, US ACE 1991) and the Regional Implementation Manual for Evaluation of Dredged Material Proposed for Disposal in New England Waters(US EPA, CENAE, 2004). 2.0 SAMPLE COLLECTION, PRESERVATION AND STORAGE Sediment core sam les were collected and provided b Y Geological Field Services, Inc.(GFS),Salem, P Massachusetts from locations specified within the project's proposed footprint.Core description log summaries ' provided by GFS are presented in Table 2.Samples were received by EnviroSystems, Incorpoarted (ESI)at it's Hampton, New Hampshire facility under chain of custody, and in sample containers appropriate for the specified analysis. Upon arrival at the laboratory,all samples received an internal sample control number and were logged into the project sample control system. Samples were placed in a secure holding location and ' stored at a temperature of 4±2°C until analysis. Sample collection and receipt information is presented in Table 1. 3.0 ANALYSIS A representative aliquot of each sample submitted was sub-sampled for grain size analysis,which was carried out under subcontract by GeoTesting Express, Incorporated, 125 Nagog Park,Acton,Massachusetts ' following RIM protocols and specifications. 4.0 RESULTS A full copy of the grain size report is included in the data appendix. Review of the data report ' documents that all sample holding times were met and thatthe methods used in the analysis were appropriate for the parameter and sample matrix. Review of supporting quality assurance data documented that all data collected meet all of the requirements specified in the RIM document and method protocol. 5.0 REFERENCES US EPA, US ACE. 1991. Evaluation of Dredged Material Proposed for Ocean Disposal- Testing Manual. ' EPA-503/8-91/001. 204 pages. US EPA Region I, Corps of Engineers, New England District. 2004. Regional Implementation Manual for ' Evaluation of Dredged Material Proposed for Disposal in New England Waters. September2004. Palmer's Cove Yacht Club Sediment Evaluation. Grain Size Analysis. U.S.Army Corps of Engineers Application Number . ESI Study 28153. Page 4 of 6 r ' Table 1. Sample Collection and Receipt Information.Palmer's Cove Yacht Club Grain Size Analysis. September 2016. Collection Receipt ' ESI Code Field ID Matrix Date Time Date Time 28153-001 PC-1 Sediment 09/09/16 1023 09/13/16 1025 28153-002 PC-2 Sediment 09/09/16 1046 09/13/16 1025 28153-003 PC-3 Sediment 09/09/16 1120 09/13/16 1025 28153-004 PC-4 Sediment 09/09/16 1137 09/13/16 1025 28153-005 PC-5 Sediment 09/09/16 1200 09/13/16 1025 ' 28153-006 PC-6 Sediment 09/09/16 1218 09/13/16 1025 28153-007 PC-7 Sediment 09/09/16 1230 09/13/16 1025 28153-008 PC-8 Sediment 09/09/16 1255 09/13/16 1025 28153-009 PC-9 Sediment 09/09/16 1318 09/13/16 1025 28153-010 PC-10 Sediment 09/09/16 1327 09/13/16 1025 r Table 2. Core Description Summary. Palmer's Cove Yacht Club Grain Size Analysis. September 2016. Core ID ESI Code Recovered Length Notes (Inches) PC-1 28153-001 48 Very soft black organic rich mud r PC-2 28153-002 12 Very soft black organic rich mud. 2"of soft gray clay in bottom of core. PC-3 28153-003 14 Very soft black organic rich mud PC-4 28153-004 12 Very soft black organic rich mud PC-5 28153-005 14 Very soft black organic rich mud PC-6 28153-006 24 Very soft black organic rich mud PC-7 28153-007 14 Very soft black organic rich mud PC-8 28153-008 20 Very soft black organic rich mud PC-9 12 Very soft black organic rich mud. 1" Brown fine 28153-009 sand PC-10 28153-010 14 Very soft black organic rich mud, 2"gray clay in ' bottom of core. All cores required repeated samples to acquire adequate sample volume. COMMENTS: Data were provided by Geological Field Services, Inc., Salem, Massachusetts. Horizontal Datum WGS 84. 1 1 ' Palmer's Cove Yacht Club Sediment Evaluation. Grain Size Analysis. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Application Number . ESI Study 28153. Page 5 of 6 r 1 DATA APPENDIX-SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Number of ' pages Core Collection Data 0 Core Description Logs 1 , Core Images 0 Grain Size Report- GeoTesting Express, Inc. 10 Chain of Custody for Grain Size Analysis 1 Sample Receipt Log and Chain of Custody 2 , Total Pages 14 1 1 1 1 1 r 1 r r Palmer's Cove Yacht Club Sediment Evaluation. Grain Size Analysis. ' U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Application Number . ESI Study 28153. Page 6 of 6 r Core Depth of Sediment Recovery Description ' Location Water Thickness (inches) PC-1 —4.5 6 feet 48" Very soft black organic rich mud PC-2 —6 4 feet 12" Very soft black organic rich mud. 2" of soft gray clay in bottom of core. PC-3 —5 5 feet 14" Very soft black organic rich mud PC-4 —9 2 feet 12" Very soft black organic rich mud PC-5 —9 2 feet 14" Very soft black organic ' rich mud PC-6 —7 4 feet 24" Very soft black organic ' rich mud PC-7 —8 2 feet 14" Very soft black organic rich mud PC-8 —9 2 feet 20" Very soft black organic rich mud PC-9 —7 2 feet 12" Very soft black organic rich mud, 1" Brown Fine Sand PC-10 —9 2 feet 14" Very soft black organic rich mud, 2"gray clay in bottom of core. rAll cores required repeated samples to acquire adequate sample volume. Palmer's Cove Yacht Club Sediment Evaluation.Grain Size Analysis. Grain Size Data Appendix Page 1 of 14 U.S.Army Corps of Engineers Application Number .ESI Study 28153. Client: EnviroSystems, Inc. Project: 28153 Location: --- Project No:GeoTesting Boring ID: --- Sample Type: jar Tested By: jbrGTX-305339 E X P 8 E S S Sample ID: PC-1 28151-001 Test Date: 09/26/16 Checked By: emm , Depth : --- Test ld: 391319 Test Comment: --- Visual Description: Moist, black silt with sand ' Sample Comment: --- Particle Size Analysis - ASTM D422 ' OO O O O O O_ O N V N V O N 100 I 1 I I I 90 . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I I 1 I 1 I I I 70 . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. 1 I I I I C60 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . �I. . .i. . . 1 ; . .'. i. . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . LL V 1 1 1 1 ; CCD . . . .. . .. .. . . . .. .. . . . .. . . . 1 . . 1 I. . . . _ . . . .. . . .. . .. .. . .. .. a ; 1 46 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . :I. . . ..I... . . .I.. . . I. . .I . .I. . J. . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . .. ; 1 1 I I i I I I I 1 1 30 .. . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . 'I . . 1 . . .1. . .� . .I. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. I 20 . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . � i 1 . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . I I I I 1 0 � 1 1000 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 Grain Size(mm) ' %Cobble %Gravel %Sand %Silt&Clay Size 0.7 17.1 82.2 Sieve Name sieva Size,mm Percent Finer Spee.Percent Complies j Coefficients ' Sot --A' � tr.'•.� i Des=0.1134 mm D30—N/A 0.375 in 9.50 100 Dro=N/A DTs=N/A #4 4.75 99 #10 2.00 98 Dso=N/A Dio=N/A #20 0.85 96 Cu =N/A Cc =N/A #40 0.42 93 #60 0.25 90 Classification #100 015 87 ASTM N/A #200 0.075 82 AASHTO Silty Soils (A-4 (0)) ' Sample/Test Description Sand/Gravel Particle Shape : --- Sand/Gravel Hardness : --- _,ed Palmers Com Yacht Club Sediment Evaluation.Grain Size Analysis. Grain Size Data Appendix Page 2 of 14 U.S.Army Corps of Engineers Application Number .ESI Study 28153. , Client: EnviroSystems, Inc. ��, Project: 28153 Geoiestin9 Location: --- Project No GTX-305339 Boring ID: --- Sample Type: jar Tested By: jbr E X P R E S S Sample ID: PC-2 28151-002 Test Date: 09/26/16 Checked By: emm Depth : --- Test Id: 391320 Test Comment: --- Visual Description: Moist, black silt Sample Comment: I ' Particle Size Analysis - ASTM D422 � _0 0 0 o O o M 100 1k a 1t 1k 1k . 1 I 90 . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . :.. . . . . . . .. . . . . . :I. . . . ,. . . . . ,.. ..:�. . . . 1 1 .. . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . .. . . . . . . . .. . 1 . . 1 11 1 . . . . . . .. . . . .. . .. . . . . . . 1 I 1 I I I fio 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 70 . . . . . . .. . . . . . . ... .. . . . . .. . .. . . . .. . . �. . ; . . . . . .. . .. . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . I I I 1 60 . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . 1 y . . 1 t. . . 1 . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LL . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . .. . .. . I . . . . . . �. 1 1 1 1 . . . . . .. . . . _ . . . . . . . . . . .. C JCD 1. a1 1 I 1 I 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . 1 1 I J 11 30 . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . ..I I I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . I 1 . . 1 . . . � . .. . .. - . .. . .. . . . . .. 1 20 1 1 , 0 1000 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 Grain Size(mm) %Cobble %Gravel %Sand %Sift&(Day Size ' — 0.4 7.9 91.7 Sieve Name Si..Size,m Percent Finer Spec.Percent oomplles Coefficients Mfrs t4 D85=N/A Dao=N/A ._... _.___....�._._ w—._ _.. 0.315 in 9.50 100 #4 4,75 100 No=N/A Dts=N/A #10 2.00 99 Dso=N/A Dto=N/A #20 0.85 99 Cu =N/A Cc =N/A #CO 042 98 #60 0.25 91 Classification #i00 0.15 96 ASTM N/A #200 0.015 92 AASHTO Silty Soils (A-4 (0)) - Sample/Test Description Sand/Gravel Particle Shape : --- Sand/Gravel Hardness : --- , pra,ed Palmers Cove-Yacht Club Sediment Evaluation.Grain Size Analysis. Grain Size Data Appendix Page 3 of 14 ' U.S.Anny Corps of Engineers Application Number .ESI Study 28153. Client: EnviroSystems, Inc. Project: 28153 GeoTesting Boring ID: --- Sample Type: jar Te ted By: jbrroject No: GTX-305339 E X P R E S S Sample ID: PC-3 28151-003 Test Date: 09/26/16 Checked By: emm Depth : --- Test Id: 391321 Test Comment: --- Visual Description: Moist, black silt ' Sample Comment: --- Particle Size Analysis - ASTM D422 ' 0C r 0 0 0 0 0 0 M 100 I ' ' I I I 1 I I 90T. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :.. .. . . . . . . .. . . . ..'. . . . .1. . . . . .1. .. . :.1.. . . 1. . .1 . . .1. . :. .1. . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . I I I i I 1 1 70 1 1 I I I I I C 60 ' I ' 1 I. 1 1 . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . it ' I 1 I I 50 J... . . __ _ _ . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . .I. . . .i. . . . . .. ,i. . . . i. . . .1. _. . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . U a � � 1 . ;. . . . . . 1. . .1 . . .1. . . .1. . I . •I 1 I � I I I 1 � 1 30 . . . . . . ... . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. .. . . 1 . 1 . . . . . .. .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . 20 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . ' . . ; ' 1 1 . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 0 :; 1 1000 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 Grain Size(rrm) , %Cobble %Gravel %Sand %Silt&Gay Size — 0.2 6.8 93.0 ' Sieve Name Sieve Size,mm Percent Finer Spee.Percent —Complies— Coefficients -: .;4 w1 1: '„ Das=N/A D30—N/A 0.0]511 sso 100 Daa=N/A Dts=N/A #4 415 100 110 2.00 100 D5o=N/A Din=N/A neo 0.95 99 Cu =N/A Cc =N/A 440 OA2 99 #60 0.25 9e Classification ' 1100 0a6 9e ASTM N/A 1200 0.075 93 AASHTO Silty Soils (A-4 (0)) , Sample/Test Description Sand/Gravel Particle Shape : --- Sand/Gravel Hardness : --- per_-led Palmers CovelYacht Club Sediment Evaluation.Grain Size Analysis. Grain Size Data Appendix Page 4 of 14 U.S.Army Corps of Engineers Application Number . ESI Study 28153. , Client: EnviroSystems, Inc. Project: 28153 6eoTesting Boring TX-305339 ID: --- Sample Type: jar Teed By: jbr I ' E X P N E S S Sample ID: PC-4 28151-004 Test Date: 09/26/16 Checked By: emm Depth : Test Id: 391322 Test Comment: --- Visual Description: Moist, black silt Sample Comment: Particle Size Analysis - ASTM D422 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 OI N V 0 N 100 I I 90 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . .. . .. . _ .. . . . . . . . . .. .:. : . :4. . . i. .1 . . .1. .:. 1 . . .. . .. . . . . . 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � 1 1 1 . r 70 1 1 1 1 1 1 � C V O; _ . . . . . . _ . .. 1i 1 1 1 . . . . . .. . . .. .. . . . . . . . .1 , , 1 Y rl . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . 1 . . . ; 1 a . . . . _ . . _. . . .. . . . . . . . _ C 50�.. , N I 1 � ' I a40 . . . . . . . . . . � . . . . . . . . . .. . . i. .. . . .. . . . . . . 1. ..1 1 1 . . . . . . ... . .. . . . .. . . .. . ..� 30 . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . 1 . . 1 . . . . . . . . . . .. ... . . . . .. . 1 1 � 1 i . .1. I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . . . . .. . .. . .. . .. . . . . .. . I 1 1 1 1 1 1000 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 Grain Size(mn) %Cobble %Gravel %Sand %Sift&Day S¢e ' — 0.0 0.5 99.5 Sieve Name Sieve Size,mm Percent Finer Spec Percent Complies Coefficients y.`f ., . * .a :5 —Al, "'" _ 'tU^.1 Des=N/A D30=N/A z4 4.v6 ,00 x10 2.00 100 D6o=N/A D15=N/A 120 0.85 100 D5o=N/A Dio=N/A s4o 0.42 100 Cu =N/A Cc =N/A #60 0.25 100 0,00 0.,5 ,00 Classification #200 0.075 ss ASTM N/A AASHTO Silty Soils (A-4 (0)) 1 Sample/Test Description Sand/Gravel Particle Shape : --- Sand/Gravel Hardness : --- Palmer's Cove, --Pa mer'sCove,Yacht Club Sediment Evaluation.Grain Size Analysis. Grain Size Data Appendix Page 5 of 14 ' U.S.Army Corps of Engineers Application Number . ESI Study 28153. Client: EnviroSystems, Inc. , Project: 28153Location: --- Project No:- GeoTesting Boring ID: --- Sample Type: jar Tested By: jbrGTX-305339 E X P R E S S Sample ID: PC-5 28151-005 Test Date: 09/26/16 Checked By: emm Depth : --- Test Id: 391323 Test Comment: --- Visual Description: Moist, black silt Sample Comment: --- Particle Size Analysis - ASTM D422 O o o Q0 o 0 100 1 I .I. . .1. 1 I I 1 70 . . . . . . . . .. . . . ... .. . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . .i . . . . . ....�. . . . . . . . . . . . ._. . . . . .. . .. . . . . ' I I LL I I I r I I I . 1 ; 1 ; . . . . . ... .. . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . 1 I r 1 . . . . . . .. . . . .. . SD U . . . . . . . i. i. 1. 1 . . .1. ..I. a40 . . . . . . . . .. . • .. .. . . . . . . . . . .. ..I. . . . . .I.. . ..L . . . I. . .1 J.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . 30 I I � I 20. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .... . . . . .�. . . ;. . . . .� . : . . . . . . . . . . : .. . . . . . . .. .. T 1000 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 Grain Size(mm) %Cobble %Gravel %Sand %Sift&Clay Size 0.0 1.4 98.6 , Sieve Name So..Size,m Percent Finer Spec.Percent C .Plies eza Coefficients __ _ Des=N/A D30=N/A loo D60—N/A Des=N/A #10 2.00 loo , .20 0.85 100 D50=N/A Dio=N/A #40 0.42 loo Cu —N/A Cc =N/A #60 0.25 100 .100 0.15 99 Classification ' #200 0.075 99 ASTM N/A AASHTO Silty Soils (A-4 (0)) Sample/Test Description Sand/Gravel Particle Shape : --- Sand/Gravel Hardness a-a-c,d Palmers CoveaY4cht Club Sediment Evaluation.Grain Size Analysis. Grain Size Data Appendix Page 6 of 14 U.S.Army Corps of Engineers Application Number .ESI Study 28153. , Client: EnviroSystems, Inc. Project: 28153 Loction: --- Project No: Geo :listing Boring ID: --- Sample Type: jar Tested By: jbrGTX-305339 E X P B E S S Sample ID: PC-6 28151-006 Test Date: 09/26/16 Checked By: emm Depth : Test Id: 391324 Test Comment: --- Visual Description: Moist, black silt Sample Comment: ' Particle Size Analysis - ASTM D422 OO � O_ O O O O O M Q N V to N 100 & 1k tlk k & 3k . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1 . . ' _ . . . .. . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . I I I 801. . I I 1 1 1 ; ; . . . � 60 I . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. I . . 1 1 . . . . . . . . . . . ... .. . . .. . .1 C . .1. i. i. I. . .'. JBi . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . i. 1 V I I a 1 1 1 1 1 40 �1. . . . . . . 1 .1 . . .1. . ..I.. I. 1 I I 1 1 I 1 30 .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . ... .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . 1 . . !.. . .. 1. . . . .. . 210, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... .. . . ' i . . . .. . . . .. . .. . . . . . .. . . I 1 I 1 1 10 . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . vl. . . . .1. . . . . 1. �.. . . . . . . . . .. . .. .. . . . . . . . 0 1000 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 Grain Size(mm) ' %Cobble %Gravel %Sand %Sift&aay Size ' 0.4 3.9 95.7 ,Siev�e Name Sim,a size,mm Percept Fmer Spec.Percent -@ mpLes Coefficients ti � Des=N/A Dao=N/A 0375 in 9.50 100 xa 4 7 roo Der,=N/A Dts=N/A .10 zoo 99 Dso=N/A Dio=N/A x20 0.85 98 Cu =N/A Cc =N/A Mao 0.42 9B ' H60 025 97 Classification M100 0a5 97 ASTM N/A N200 0.075 96 AASHTO Silty Soils (A-4 (01 1 --------- Sample/Test Description Sand/Gravel Particle Shape : --- Sand/Gravel Hardness : --- P—, d Palmees ICovelYacht Club Sediment Evaluation.Grain Size Analysis. Grain Size Data Appendix Page 7 of 14 U.S.Army Corps of Engineers Application Number . ESI Study 28153. Client: Enviro5ystems, Inc. Project: 28153 Location: --- Project No:GeoTesting Boring ID: --- Sample Type: jar Tested By: jbrGTX-305339 E X P R E S S Sample ID: PC-7 28151-007 Test Date: 09/26/16 Checked By: emm , Depth : --- Testld: 391325 Test Comment: --- Visual Description: Moist, black silt ' Sample Comment: --- Particle Size-Analysis - ASTM D422 1 O o o V(0 o 0 100 & 1k 1k Sk k lk ' 1 I 1 90 . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . ..i. . . . . .i . . .�. ,. .i. . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . — .. .. 80 .. . . . .. . .. .. . . .. . . .. . . . . .. . . .. .. . . . . : � . . i. . . , . . . . .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . ' 70 . . . . . . _ . . . .. . . :. .. .. . . . . . . .. . . :. . . _�. . . . . .;. . . . . .�. _. . _ . . . .. . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . c50 . . . . . . .. .. . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . i i . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . a 1 1 40 . . . . . . .. .. . .. . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . .'. .. . . .I. . . ..1. . . . 1. . .1 . . .1. . ...1. . . . . . . . .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I I 1 I 10 . . . . . .. .. . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . .. 1.. .I. . ...I. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . O .. 1000 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 Grain Size(mm) %Cobble %Gravel %Sand %Silt&Clay Size ' — 0.0 0.7 99.3 , 'Sieve Name Sieve Size,m Percent Finer Spee.Percent -„Complies Coefficients �. D85—N/A D30=N/A N4 4.75 100 x1a Dso=N/A DtS=N/A zoo 100 120 0.65 100 D5o=N/A Dto=N/A x40 0.42 100 Cu =N/A Cc =N/A x60 0.25 100 1100 0.15 100 - Classification ' x200 0.075 99 ASTM N/A AASHTO Silty Soils (A-4 (0)) Sample/Test Description ' Sand/Gravel Particle Shape : --- Sand/Gravel Hardness : --- prz n,ee Palmefs dCove Yacht Club Sediment Evaluation.Grain Size Analysis. Grain Size Data Appendix Page 8 of 14 U.S.Army Corps of Engineers Application Number . ESI Study 28153. Client: 28153 Systems, Inc. Project: 28153 Gii;Zs#ing Location --- Project No: GTX-305339 ' Boring ID: Sample Type: jar Tested By: jbr III E X P E S S Sample ID: PC-8 28151-008 Test Date: 09/26/16 Checked By: emm Depth : . Testld: 391326 Test Comment: --- Visual Description: Moist, black silt Sample Comment: Particle Size Analysis - ASTM D422 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 v & # I 1 1 90 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . :I. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. .. . . .. . . . . . 1 . . . .I. 1 ; . . . ..I . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I 1 1 1 80 1 I I . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . ... . ; . . I 1 .. .. . . . . . .. . . . . . I C I LL . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 . . 1 1 1 . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 1 1 1 1 1 1 I a 40r1 I 1r 1r .. . . . . . . . . . 30 . . . . . . . . . . . . —. .. .... .. .. . . . ... . t1 20 . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . ' . . i. ..i . . . . . . .. . .. : . .. .. . . . .. . . I 1 1 1 I I 1 10 . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . ..1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1000 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 Grain Size(mm) %Cobble %Gravel %Sand %Sift&CIayS¢e ' 0.0 1.6 98.4 Sieve.Name Sieve Size,mm Percent.F ner Spec.Peroen[ ;,Complies Coefficients F w D85=N/A D30=N/A _. 00 x2o z.o0 200 D60=N/A D15=N/A x20 0.85 100 D5o—N/A D10=N/A x40 0.42 100 Cu =N/A Cc =N/A 0 0.25 100 —#100 0.15 os Classification xmo o.ms se ASTM N/A AASHTO Silty Soils (A-4 (0)) Sample/Test Description Sand/Gravel Particle Shape : --- Sand/Gravel Hardness : --- Palmers Cove Yacht Club Sediment Evaluation.Grain Size Analysis. Grain Size Data Appendix Page 9 of 14 U.S.Army Corps of Engineers Application Number .ESI Study 28153. l Client: EnviroSystems, Inc. Project: 28153Locr GeoTesting Boring ID: --- Sample Type: jar Tested By: jbrGTX-305339 E X P P E S S Sample ID: PC-9 28151-009 Test Date: 09/26/16 Checked By: emm ' Depth : --- Test Id: 391327 Test Comment: --- Visual Description: Moist, black silt with sand Sample Comment: --- Particle Size Analysis - ASTM D422 OO O O O O O O N V N V (O N 100 ik ik 1k ik 1>; Yk 3k ' 1 1 1 I I 1 1 80 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . �'. . . .1. . . . . . .I. . . .I. . .1 . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. I I I 1 1 1 70 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. .. 1 . . . . . .;. 1 . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' 1 1 I I 1 1 1 Oi V . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . .. .. l 1 1 I 1 1 1 l C . . .. .. C LL 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 :I 1 1 : I 1 1 1 1 U J I 40 . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1. . .. 1.. .. . 1. . . I. . . . I. ..1 . . .1. . . ... . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . T I307". . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .�. . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . !. . . . . !. _ . .!. . . . !. . .i. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . j11 1 I I 1 . . . . . .. .. . . . . . :. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . �. 1 1 ; 1 201 . . . . ,. . . . . ,. . . . :,. . . . ,. . .1 . . .1. . .:. 1. . . . . . . . . .. .. .. . . . . . . . . I 1 1 1 I I 1 r 101. . _ . _ . . _ . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. '� � I . . . . . . . . . . _ . . . . . . . . . . . . 1000 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 Grain Size(mm) ' %Cobble %Gravel %Sand %Sift&(Day Size 0.5 28.8 70.7 ' Sieve Name Simm Size,mm Percent Finer Spec.Percent Complies 1 Coefficients 4"3 A „7j Des=0.1142 mm D30=N/A 0.375 in 9.50V100 Doo=N/A Dts=N/A x4 4.75 loo , 110 2.00 99 D5o=N/A Dio=N/A 120 0.85 9e Cu =N/A Cc =N/A x40 0.40 9e aso 0,25 9e Classification 1100 015 94 ASTM N/A 1200 0.075 71 AASHTO Silty Soils (A-4 (0)) Sample/Test Description Sand/Gravel Particle Shape : --- Sand/Gravel Hardness : --- 1,11-11 a Palmers Cove,Yacht Club Sediment Evaluation.Grain Size Analysis. Grain Size Data Appendix Page 10 of 14 U.S.Army Corps of Engineers Application Number .ESI Study 28153. Client: EnviroSystems, Inc. Project: 28153 GeoTesting Location: --- Project No: GTX-305339 ' Boring ID: - Sample Type: jar Tested By: jbr E X P p E S S Sample ID: PC-10 28151-010 Test Date: 09/26/16 Checked By: emm Depth : Test Id: 391328 Test Comment: --- Visual Description: Moist, black silt Sample Comment: Particle Size Analysis - ASTM D422 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 1 1 .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . I 80 r . . . . . . ; ; . ; . . . . . I I 1 I r L60 _ . . . . . . . . . V li rr _ I II1 — 30 ' I : . . . . .. . . . .. . . T I I I I I 1 10 . . . . . . . . . .. . .. .. . . . . . .. . . . . .I. . . . .I. . I I 1 1 . . . . . . . . . . . ... . .. .. . . . . . .. . r DT. . III} I I I I 1 I I 1000 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 ' Grain Size(m r) %Cobble %Gravel %Sand %Sift&Clay Size ' 0.0 6.8 93.2 Sieve Nameieve size,m Percent Finer spec.Percent Complies— Coefficients a- OAi #? ,a 4 .� ;.,r x°b �1, ; Des=N/A Dao=N/A 4.]s ,00 xlo 2.00 Deo=N/A Cis=N/A 99 x20 o.85 99 D5o=N/A D10=N/A "o 0.42 98 Cu =N/A Cc =N/A x6o 0.25 98 x,00 o.,5 91 Classification x200 om5 99 ASTM N/A AASHTO Silty Soils (A-4 (0)) Sample/Test Description Sand/Gravel Particle Shape : --- Sand/Gravel Hardness : --- r P=--,e�Palmers r-ove.Yacht Club Sediment Evaluation.Grain Size Analysis. Grain Size Data Appendix Page 11 of 14 rU.S.Army Corps of Engineers Application Number . ESI Study 28153. EnviroSystems, Inc. 51 ESI Hampton eNRadHo03842 FAX: 603-926-3521 ESI Job No: CHAIN OF CUSTODY DOCUMENTATION c. ant: EnviroS stems Inc. Contact: Elizabeth Penta Project Name: 28153 V. 3 Report to: Elizabeth Penta Address: P.O. Box 778 Project Number: Task: 0001 0 I voice to: Patti Koester Address: Hampton, NH 03843 Project Manager: Elizabeth Penta N iI ice: 603-926-3345 Fax: 60-926-3521 email: epenta@envirosystems.com m n ERR m'L®b Number Your Field ID: Date Time Sampled Grab Container Field Matrix Filler Analyses Requested\ y(Wsigned (must agree with Sampled Sampled By orcom- No Size Type Preser- S=Said N=NMneeded Special Instructions: lab) oonteiner) poslle (mL) (P/GM vatlon W=Water F=Done in lel v GIC L=Lab to do a � n m m col ogltb �cg3 o PC-1 28153-001 1 9oz G 4C Solid N Grain Size m 3 o PC-2 28153-002 ,cob 1 90z G 4C Solid N Grain Size m G) m_ PC-3 28153-003 tt 2 b 1 90z G 4C Solid N Grain Size m PC-4 28153-004 i�3-1 1 9oz G 4C Solid I N Grain Size V. D 7 PC-5 28153-005 t2o� 1 9oz G 4C Solid N Grain Size V. Eu PC-6 28153-006 \2 ITS 1 9oz G 4C Solid N Grain Size PC-7 28153-007 r236 1 9oz G 4C Solid N Grain Size PC-8 28153-008 1255 1 9oz G 4C ISolid N I Grain Size PC-9 28153-009 tare 1 9oz G 4C Solid N Grain Size L7 5' PC-10 28153-010 1321 1 90z G 4C Solid N Grain Size rn N N VJN d D 15 f/ lin uished By: Date: /Z' �`�Tme: �C Receive y- Date: Time; Felin uished By: Date: Time: Received at Lab B : Date: Time,, r8Comments: 0 ERR A COC Number: A1006787 Sample Delivery Grou No: September 2016 Pae of ESI SAMPLE RECEIPT AND CONDITION DOCUMENTATION Page 1 of 1 STUDY NO: 28153 SDG No: Project: Palmer Cove Yacht Club Delivered via: ESI Date and Time Received: 09/13/16 1025 Date and Time Logged into Lab: 09/13/ Received By: RS Logged into Lab by: 'ITP (F? bill/Way bill: - No Air bill included in folder if received? N/A c�JMI� Cooler on ice/packs: Yes Custody Seals present? N/A Cooler Blank Temp(C)at arrival:6C Custody Seals intact? N/A Number of COC Pages: 1 COC Serial Number(s): N/A COC Complete: Yes Does the info on the COC match the samples? Yes Sampled Date: Yes Were samples received within holding time? Yes Field ID complete: Yes Were all samples properly labeled? Yes Sampled Time: Yes Were proper sample containers used? Yes Analysis request: Yes Were samples received intact?(none broken or leaking) Yes COC Signed and dated: Yes Were sample volumes sufficient for requested analysis? Yes Were all samples received? Yes Were VOC vials free of headspace? N/A Client notification/authorization: Not required pH Test strip ID number: N/A Bottle Req'd Verged Field ID Lab ID Mx Analysis Requested Pres'n Pres'n PC-1 28153-001 S Subsample:Grain Size txigal P 4C Yes ' PC-2 28153-002 S Subsample:Grain Size ixtgal P 4C Yes PC-3 28153-003 S Subsample:Grain Size 1xlgal P 4C Yes PC-0 28153-004 S Subsample:Grain Size ixtgal P 4C Yes PC-5 28153-005 S Subsample:Grain Size txigal P 4C Yes PC-0 28153-006 S Subsample:Grain Size txigal P 4C Yes PC-7 28153-007 S Subsample:Grain Size ixtgal P 4C Yes PC-8 28153-008 S Subsample:Grain Size ixtgal P 4C Yes PC-9 28153-009 S Subsample:Grain Size lxlgal P 4C Yes ' PC-10 28153-010 S Subsample:Grain Size lxlgal P 4C Yes I Notes and qualifications: i ' EnvimSystems,Inc. One Lafayette Road P.O.Box 778 Hampton,NH 0384241778 (603)926-3395 fax(603)926-3521 wxw.enWrusystems.com Palmers Cove Yacht Club Sediment Evaluation.Grain Size Analysis. Grain Size Data Appendix Page 13 of 14 U.S.Army Corps of Engineers Application Number .ESI Study 28153. IM WIlM M M' M M' IM Man M M ae Ir r. aw r ESI Enviro5ystems,Inc. Voice:603-926-3345 ESI Job No: I Lafayette Road FAX: 603-926-3521 P.O.Box 77B Hampton,N.H.03843 CHAIN OF CUSTODY DOCUMENTATION Client: Cjc 11 l.A1. I -D Ct LLri Contact: Pro'ect Name: MG�. ov Pa a of o L m Re ort to: LVA-e- FA(3Q 2:z Address: Project Number, m x Invoice to: SFS Address: �L MtF1' O\y-4-J Project Manager: o Gn 21NoCC'fNJ o. Voice: QaY'✓l �J Fax: email: �� r- 6 �f 1° P.O.No: Quote No: a M Protocol: RCRA SDWA NPDES USCOE Other rere Lab Number Your Field ID: Date Time Sampled Grab Conlalnerl Container Field Matrix Filter Analyses Requested\ IN N (assigned (must agree with Sampled Sampled B or corn- Size T s=sale N=Not needed by len) mntainar) P P y ype Preser- Special Instructions: posit (mij Iplan) vatlon W=Water F=Done in field (�C) t=iab Wto 0o i C - ► -i e 015 W c 1 waj P �� PC- Z I I oq,- -003 c- 3 11L0 009 1 PC, v 9 113 ta TN -00 PG' < w -00(Q C- (o 12t8 c a o E ;Z 00� C 131f CL 010 C- 1 13Z�+ U c L W n1 Y n jit O Relinquished By: Date: Time: Received E 8 : - B: r o a mN Relin uishe Date: (y Time:/()!a-y Received at Lab @y: Date: I Time: Q a Comment . -- lz Sample Delivery Group No: Page of 1 i 1 D O r 3 m z m i i t 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 I 1 1 i 1 ATTACHMENT E A CITY OF SALEM g, CONSERVA'T'ION COMMISSION t I January 28, 2016 Robert Strasnick Palmer's Cove Yacht Club 78 Leavitt Street Salem, MA 01970 Re: Order of Conditions—DEP 464-609—Palmer's Cove Yacht Club , Dear Mr. Strasnick: Enclosed, please find the Order of Conditions for the above-referenced project. Following the 10-business-day appeal period, this document and attachments must be recorded at the South Essex County Registry of Deeds (Shetland Park 45 Congress Street, Suite 4100 Salem, MA). Once recorded, please return a copy of Page 12 of the Order, which will indicate to the Commission that the document has been recorded. As indicated in the Order, prior to any work commencing: 1. this Order must be recorded, 2. a sign shall be displayed showing DEP File#64-609 within public view; and 3. contact me at least 48 hours prior to any activity to schedule a pre-construction meeting to review the Order with your hired contractor. If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me at 978-619-5685. f� f Sincerely, r Tom Devine s Conservation Agent k _ 8� Enclosures CC: DEP Northeast Regional Office y� Luke Fabbri r E L b' Y --' Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassoEP: Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands 64-609 MassDEPFle# WPA Form 5 — Order of Conditions Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 eDEPTransaction# Salem cityrrown A. General Information Please note: Salem ____ ____ Ibeen modified m has 1. From: been Conservation Commission we with added z. This issuance is for space to a.®Order of Conditions b.❑Amended Order of Conditions accommodate (check one): the Registry ' of Deeds 3. To: Applicant: — — ---- ---- Requirements Robert_ Strasnick _ Important: a.First Name b. Last Name t - When tilling Palmer's Cove Yacht Club out forms on c.Organization the 78 Leavitt Street _ computer, use only the d.Mailing Address tab key to Salem MA _ 01970 move your e.City/Town I.State g.Zip Code t cursor-do not use the 4. Property Owner(if different from applicant): return key. i .m a. First Name b. Last Name - - ruun f d. Mailing Address -" s- e. City/Town �— f.State5. Project Project Location: 78 Leavitt Street _ _ _Salem a.Street Address b.Cityfrown e 34 4_49 c.Assessors Map/Plat—Number d. Parte VLot Number Latitude and Longitude, if known: d m S _ d m _ s_ f d. Latitude e.Longitude w0alorn5.doc• rev.6/t 6/2015 Page 1 of 12 _ f 4. r Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by Mass DEP: _ Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands 64-609 _ �` MassDEP File# ;�� WPA Form 5 - Order of Conditions Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 eDEP Transaction# Ll- Salem A. General Information (cont.) Cityfrown 6. Property recorded at the Registry of Deeds for(attach additional information if more than one parcel): South Essex 99115 _ a.County b.Certificate Number(if registered land) — — c. Book --------- - — d Page 7. Dates: 11/24/2015 _1/14/2016 _ 1/15/2016 a. Date Notice of Intent Filed b.Date Public Hearing Closed c.Date of Issuance s. Final Approved Plans and Other Documents (attach additional plan or document references as needed): r See attached a. ------ - -- a. Plan Title b. Prepared By c. Signed and Stamped by r d.Final Revision Date e. Scale i Title g.Date f.Additional Plan or Document B. Findings i t. Findings pursuant to the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act: Following the review of the above-referenced Notice of Intent and based on the information z� provided in this application and presented at the public hearing, this Commission finds that i the areas in which work is proposed is significant to the following interests of the Wetlands Protection Act(the Act). Check all that apply: a. El Public Water Supply b. ® Land Containing Shellfish `' ❑ Prevention of Pollution d. ❑ Private Water Supply e. ® Fisheries I. ® Protection of Wildlife Habitat g. ❑ Groundwater Supply h. ® Storm Damage Prevention i. ® Flood Control 2. This Commission hereby finds the project, as proposed, is:(check one of the following boxes) i Approved subject to: a. ® the following conditions which are necessary in accordance with the performance standards set forth in the wetlands regulations. This Commission orders that all work shall be performed in accordance with the Notice of Intent referenced above, the following General Conditions, and any other special conditions attached to this Order. To the extent that the following conditions modify or differ from the plans, specifications, or other proposals submitted with the Notice of Intent, these conditions shall control. E' l -w.,m5dot• rev.6115 D15 Psge]o(t2 1 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: _ Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands 64-609 WPA Form 5 - Order of Conditions Mass—DEP FHe Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 eoEP Transaotion# Salem U yHown_ B. Findings (cont.) Denied because: b. ❑ the proposed work cannot be conditioned to meet the performance standards set forth in the wetland regulations. Therefore, work on this project may not go forward unless and until a new Notice of Intent is submitted which provides measures which are adequate to protect the interests of the Act, and a final Order of Conditions is issued. A description of the performance standards which the proposed work cannot meet is attached to this Order. c. ❑ the information submitted by the applicant is not sufficient to describe the site, the work, or the effect of the work on the interests identified in the Wetlands Protection Act. Therefore, work on this project may not go forward unless and until a revised Notice of Intent is submitted which provides sufficient information and includes measures which are adequate to protect the Act's interests, and a final Order of Conditions is issued. A description of the specific information which is lacking and why it is necessary is attached to this Order as per 310 CMR 10.05(6)(c). 3. ❑ Buffer Zone Impacts: Shortest distance between limit of project disturbance and the wetland resource area specified in 310 CMR 10.02(1)(a) a.linear feet Inland Resource Area Impacts: Check all that apply below. (For Approvals Only) Resource Area Proposed Permitted Proposed Permitted Alteration AlterationReplacement Replacement 4. F-1Bank a. linear feet b.linear feet— c.linearfeet d.linear feet s. ❑ Bordering Vegetated Wetland a.square feet b.square feet c.square feet d.square feet 6. ❑ Land Under Waterbodies and a.square feet b.square fee[ c.square feet d.square feet Waterways e.c(y dredged f 7y dredged p T ❑ Bordering Land _ Subject to Flooding a.square feet b.square feet c.square feet d square feet Cubic Feet Flood Storage -e. cubicfeet f. cubicfeet g.cubicfeet h cubicfeet a. ❑ Isolated Land @ Subject to Flooding a.square feet b.square feet - Cubic Feet Flood Storage c.cubic feet d.cubic feet e.cubic feet f.cubic feet 9. ❑ Riverfront Area a.- — b.total sq.feet total sq.feet Sq ft within 100 ft — c,square feet d.square feet e.square feet f.square feet Sq ft between 100- 200 ft g.square feet h.square feet i.square That I.square feet wHaroms.ao� �e�.snsrzors Page 3 of 12 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: r Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands 64-609 WPA Form 5 - Order of Conditions MassDEP File#To—EP Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 EP Transaction# -- Salem _ City?own , B. Findings (cont.) Coastal Resource Area Impacts: Check all that apply below. (For Approvals Only) Proposed Permitted Proposed Permitted Alteration Alteration Replacement Replacement to. ❑ Designated Port Indicate size under Land Under the Ocean, below Areas 11. ® Land Under the 288840 288840 Ocean a.square feet b.square feet 25000 25000 a dy dredged d.Gy dredged 1z. ❑ Barrier Beaches Indicate size under Coastal Beaches and/or Coastal Dunes below 13. ❑ Coastal Beaches — _ cu yd cu yd a.square feet b.square feet c.nourishment d.nourishment = 14. F-1Coastaldunes -- -- cu yd cu yd_ a.square feet h.square feet c.nourishment d.nourishment 15. ❑ Coastal Banks a.linearfeet b. linear feet 16. ❑ Rocky Intertidal _ Shores a.square feet b.square feet 17. ❑ Salt Marshes a.square feet bsquare feet c.square feet d.square feet f 1a. ❑ Land Under Salt Ponds a.square feet b.square feet I c.c/y dredged d.dy dredged 19. ❑ Land Containing Shellfish a.square feet b.square feet c.square feet d.square feet 20. ® Fish Runs Indicate size under Coastal Banks, Inland Bank, Land Under the Ocean, and/or inland Land Under Waterbodies and Waterways, above t. 25000 25000_ a.c/y dredged b.Gy dredged_ E 21, ❑ Land Subject to Coastal Storm a.square feet b.square feet t� Flowage i s 22, ❑ Riverfront Area a.total sq.feet b.total sq.feet Sq ft within 100 ft -- c.square feet d.square feet e.square feet f.square feet Sq ft between 100- 200 It 00-200It - g.square feet h.square feet i.square feet j.square feet f, 6 _ v wpafoem5.tloc• ray.W16MIS Page 4 at 12 �r Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands 64-609 —Fite-i---- WPA Form 5 — Order of Conditions File MassDEP # _ Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 eoEP-rransaction# Salem i � ---- — B. Findings (cont.) City/Town #23. If the P3. ❑ Restoration/Enhancement`: project is for the purpose of restoring or a.square feet of BVW -- - --- enhancinga q b.square feetofsalt marsh wetland resource area 24. ❑ Stream Crossing(s): in addition to - the square footage that a.number of new stream crossings b.number of replacement stream crossings has been C. General Conditions Under Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act entered in Section 13.5.c e tVW){salt or The following conditions are only applicable to Approved projects. Marsh)above, I. Failure to comply with all conditions stated herein, and with all related statutes and other please enter the additional 9 Y re ulator measures, shall be deemed cause to revoke or modify this Order. amount here. 2. The Order does not grant any property rights or any exclusive privileges; it does not authorize any injury to private property or invasion of private rights. 3. This Order does not relieve the permittee or any other person of the necessity of complying with all other applicable federal, state, or local statutes, ordinances, bylaws, or regulations. 4. The work authorized hereunder shall be completed within three years from the date of this Order unless either of the following apply: a. The work is a maintenance dredging project as provided for in the Act; or b. The time for completion has been extended to a specified date more than three years, but less than five years, from the date of issuance. If this Order is intended to be valid for more than three years, the extension date and the special circumstances warranting the extended time period are set forth as a special condition in this Order. c. If the work is for a Test Project, this Order of Conditions shall be valid for no more than one year. 5. This Order may be extended by the issuing authority for one or more periods of up to three years each upon application to the issuing authority at least 30 days prior to the expiration date of the Order. An Order of Conditions for a Test Project may be extended for one additional year only upon written application by the applicant, subject to the provisions of 310 CMR 10.05(11)(f). 6. If this Order constitutes an Amended Order of Conditions, this Amended Order of Conditions does not extend the issuance date of the original Final Order of Conditions and the Order will expire on 1/15/2019 unless extended in writing by the Department. 7. Any fill used in connection with this project shall be clean fill. Any fill shall contain no trash, E refuse, rubbish, or debris, including but not limited to lumber, bricks, plaster, wire, lath, paper, cardboard, pipe, tires, ashes, refrigerators, motor vehicles, or parts of any of the foregoing. f t F wi,afarm5 me• rev.6JIU2015g Page5of12 R ly j 1. -� Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP. _ Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands 64-609 WPA Form 5 - Order of Conditions MassDEP File# Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 eDEP Transaction# Salem city/Town C. General Conditions Under Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act 8. This Order is not final until all administrative appeal periods from this Order have elapsed, or if such an appeal has been taken, until all proceedings before the Department have been completed. 9. No work shall be undertaken until the Order has become final and then has been recorded in the Registry of Deeds or the Land Court for the district in which the land is located, within the chain of title of the affected property. In the case of recorded land, the Final Order shall also be noted in the Registry's Grantor Index under the name of the owner of the land upon which the proposed work is to be done. In the case of the registered land, the Final Order shall also be noted on the Land Court Certificate of Title of the owner of the land upon which the proposed work is done. The recording information shall be submitted to the Conservation Commission on the form at the end of this Order, which form must be stamped by the Registry of Deeds, prior to the commencement of work. 10. A sign shall be displayed at the site not less then two square feet or more than three square feet in size bearing the words, "Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection"[or, "MassDEP"] "File Number 64-609 11. Where the Department of Environmental Protection is requested to issue a Superseding Order, the Conservation Commission shall be a party to all agency proceedings and hearings before MassDEP. 12. Upon completion of the work described herein, the applicant shall submit a Request for Certificate of Compliance (WPA Form 8A) to the Conservation Commission. f 13. The work shall conform to the plans and special conditions referenced in this order. 14. Any change to the plans identified in Condition#13 above shall require the applicant to inquire of the Conservation Commission in writing whether the change is significant enough to require the filing of a new Notice of Intent. f 15. The Agent or members of the Conservation Commission and the Department of Environmental Protection shall have the right to enter and inspect the area subject to this Order at reasonable hours to evaluate compliance with the conditions stated in this Order, and may require the submittal of any data deemed necessary by the Conservation Commission or Department for that evaluation. i 16. This Order of Conditions shall apply to any successor in interest or successor in control of the property subject to this Order and to any contractor or other person performing work y� conditioned by this Order. ( wpaform5.tloc rev.6/16f20i5 Page of 12 e� i Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEPIk : Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands 64-609 �� WPA Form 5 - Order of Conditions MassDEP File# Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 eDEP Transaction Salem City/Town C. General Conditions Under Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act (cont.) 17. Prior to the start of work, and if the project involves work adjacent to a Bordering Vegetated Wetland, the boundary of the wetland in the vicinity of the proposed work area shall be marked by wooden stakes or flagging. Once in place, the wetland boundary markers shall be maintained until a Certificate of Compliance has been issued by the Conservation Commission. 18. All sedimentation barriers shall be maintained in good repair until all disturbed areas have been fully stabilized with vegetation or other means. At no time shall sediments be deposited in a wetland or water body. During construction, the applicant or his/her designee shall inspect the erosion controls on a daily basis and shall remove accumulated sediments as needed. The applicant shall immediately control any erosion problems that occur at the site and shall also immediately notify the Conservation Commission, which reserves the right to require additional erosion and/or damage prevention controls it may deem necessary. Sedimentation barriers shall serve as the limit of work unless another limit of I work line has been approved by this Order. 19. The work associated with this Order(the"Project') (1) ❑ is subject to the Massachusetts Stormwater Standards (2)® is NOT subject to the Massachusetts Stormwater Standards If the work is subject to the Stormwater Standards,then the project is subject to the - following conditions: a) All work, including site preparation, land disturbance, construction and redevelopment, shall be implemented in accordance with the construction period pollution prevention and erosion and sedimentation control plan and, if applicable, the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan required by the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System Construction General Permit as required by Stormwater Condition 8. Construction period erosion, sedimentation and pollution control measures and best management practices (BMPs)shall remain in place until the site is fully stabilized. b) No stormwater runoff may be discharged to the post-construction stormwater BMPs unless and until a Registered Professional Engineer provides a Certification that: i. all construction period BMPs have been removed or will be removed by a date certain specified in the Certification. For any construction period BMPs intended to be converted to post construction operation for stormwater attenuation, recharge, and/or treatment, the conversion is allowed by the MassDEP Stormwater Handbook BMP specifications and that the BMP has been properly cleaned or prepared for post construction operation, including removal of all construction period sediment trapped in inlet and outlet control structures; k ii. as-built final construction BMP plans are included, signed and stamped by a Registered Professional Engineer, certifying the site is fully stabilized; iii. any illicit discharges to the stormwater management system have been removed, as per the requirements of Stormwater Standard 10; k wpalorm5_tloc revs/162015 Page 7 of 12 , j;. t Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands 64-609 _ WPA Form 5 — Order of Conditions MassDEP File# Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 all Transaction# Salem _ City/Town C. General Conditions Under Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act (cont.) iv. all post-construction stormwater BMPs are installed in accordance with the plans (including all planting plans)approved by the issuing authority, and have been inspected to ensure that they are not damaged and that they are in proper working condition; v. any vegetation associated with post-construction BMPs is suitably established to withstand erosion. c) The landowner is responsible for BMP maintenance until the issuing authority is notified that another party has legally assumed responsibility for BMP maintenance. Prior to requesting a Certificate of Compliance, or Partial Certificate of Compliance, the responsible party(defined in General Condition 18(e))shall execute and submit to the issuing authority an Operation and Maintenance Compliance Statement("O&M Statement)for the Stormwater BMPs identifying the party responsible for implementing the stormwater BMP Operation and Maintenance Plan ("O&M Plan')and certifying the following: r i.)the O&M Plan is complete and will be implemented upon receipt of the Certificate of Compliance, and ii.) the future responsible parties shall be notified in writing of their ongoing legal responsibility to operate and maintain the stormwater management BMPs and implement the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. d) Post-construction pollution prevention and source control shall be implemented in accordance with the long-term pollution prevention plan section of the approved Stormwater Report and, if applicable, the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan required by the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System Multi-Sector General Permit. e) Unless and until another party accepts responsibility, the landowner, or owner of any drainage easement, assumes responsibility for maintaining each BMP. To overcome this presumption, the landowner of the property must submit to the issuing authority a legally binding agreement of record, acceptable to the issuing authority, evidencing that another entity has accepted responsibility for maintaining the BMP, and that the proposed responsible party shall be treated as a permittee for purposes of implementing the requirements of Conditions 18(f)through 18(k)with respect to that BMP. Any failure of the proposed responsible party to implement the requirements of Conditions 18(f)through 18(k)with respect to that BMP shall be a violation of the Order of Conditions or Certificate of Compliance. In the case of stormwater BMPs that are serving more than one lot, the legally binding agreement shall also identify the lots that will be serviced by the stormwater BMPs. A plan and easement deed that grants the responsible party access to perform the F required operation and maintenance must be submitted along with the legally binding agreement L f) The responsible party shall operate and maintain all stormwater BMPs in accordance with the design plans, the O&M Plan, and the requirements of the Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook. l; s � wPatorm5.doo• re¢61162015 Page 6 0l 12 i Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands 64-609 WPA Form 5 - Order of Conditions MassDEP File# Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 eDEP Transaction# Salem Citydown --C. General Conditions Under Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act (cont.) g) The responsible party shall: 1. Maintain an operation and maintenance log for the last three (3) consecutive calendar years of inspections, repairs, maintenance and/or replacement of the stormwater management system or any part thereof, and disposal (for disposal the log shall indicate the type of material and the disposal location); 2. Make the maintenance log available to MassDEP and the Conservation Commission ("Commission") upon request; and 3. Allow members and agents of the MassDEP and the Commission to enter and inspect the site to evaluate and ensure that the responsible party is in compliance with the requirements for each BMP established in the O&M Plan approved by the issuing authority. h) All sediment or other contaminants removed from stormwater BMPs shall be disposed of in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations. i) Illicit discharges to the stormwater management system as defined in 310 CMR 10.04 !_ are prohibited. j) The stormwater management system approved in the Order of Conditions shall not be changed without the prior written approval of the issuing authority. k) Areas designated as qualifying pervious areas for the purpose of the Low Impact Site Design Credit(as defined in the MassDEP Stormwater Handbook, Volume 3, Chapter 1, Low Impact Development Site Design Credits) shall not be altered without the prior written approval of the issuing authority. 1) Access for maintenance, repair, and/or replacement of BMPs shall not be withheld. Any fencing constructed around stormwater BMPs shall include access gates and shall be at least six inches above grade to allow for wildlife passage. Special Conditions (if you need more space for additional conditions, please attach a text document): 20. For Test Projects subject to 310 CMR 10.05(11), the applicant shall also implement the monitoring plan and the restoration plan submitted with the Notice of Intent. If the conservation commission or Department determines that the Test Project threatens the public health, safety or the environment, the applicant shall implement the removal plan submitted with the Notice of Intent or modify the project as directed by the conservation commission or the Department. a ,P.fam,5.dw• rev.611612015 Page 9 M 12 X; y Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands 64-609 —_ # WPA Form 5 - Order of Conditions MassDEP File Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 -e-DEP Transaction# Salem Cityrown --- D. Findings Under Municipal Wetlands Bylaw or Ordinance 1. Is a municipal wetlands bylaw or Ordinance applicable? ® Yes ❑ No 2. The Salem v hereby finds (check one that applies): _ Conservation Commission a. ❑ that the proposed work cannot be conditioned to meet the standards set forth in a municipal ordinance or bylaw, specifically: 1.Municipal Ordinance or Bylaw 2.Citation Therefore,work on this project may not go forward unless and until a revised Notice of Intent is submitted which provides measures which are adequate to meet these standards, and a final Order of Conditions is issued. b. ® that the following additional conditions are necessary to comply with a municipal ordinance or bylaw: Wetlands Protection &Conservation Ordinancec.50_ _ 1. Municipal Ordinance or Bylaw __ 2.Citation 3, The Commission orders that all work shall be performed in accordance with the following conditions and with the Notice of Intent referenced above. To the extent that the following conditions modify or differ from the plans, specifications, or other proposals submitted with the Notice of Intent, the conditions shall control. The special conditions relating to municipal ordinance or bylaw are as follows(if you need more space for additional conditions, attach a text document): Attached conditions are issued under the Wetlands Protection Act and are sufficient for compliance with the local ordinance. - -- -- ----- - ---- ---------------- w ----------- s w amrm5 dot• rev.6!16215 Page 10 of 12 [� z Y, i Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MasspEP: Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands WPA Form 5 — Order of Conditions MassDEP File# Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 eDEP-Transaouo— n a City/Town E. Signatures Important:When This Order is valid for three years, unless otherwise specified as a special filling out forms condition pursuant to General Conditions#4, from the date of issuance. -1 16—ate—W1 j on the computer, use only the tab Please indicate the number of members who will sign this form. key to move your This Order must be signed by a majority of the Conservation Commission. 2_NuJJ yr of signers cursor-do not use the return The Order must be mailed by certified mail (return receipt requested)or hand delivered to key. the applicant.A copy must be mailed, hand delivered or filed electronically at th ,same time with the approp late MassDEP Regional Office. m Signature i ❑ by hand delivery on by certified mail, return receipt requested n �__ -- -- - -- - -- I Date ui,fe F. Appeals The applicant, the owner, any person aggrieved by this Order, any owner of land abutting the land subject to this Order, or any ten residents of the city or town in which such land is located, are hereby notified of their right to request the appropriate MassDEP Regional Office to issue a Superseding Order of Conditions.The request must be made by certified mail or hand delivery to the Department, with the appropriate filing fee and a completed Request for Departmental Action Fee Transmittal Form, as provided in 310 CMR 10.03(7) within ten business days from the date of issuance of this Order.A copy of the request shall at the same time be sent by certified mail or hand delivery to the Conservation Commission and to the applicant, if he/she is not the appellant. Any appellants seeking to appeal the Department's Superseding Order associated with this appeal will be required to demonstrate prior participation in the review of this project. Previous participation in the permit proceeding means the submission of written information to the t Conservation Commission prior to the close of the public hearing, requesting a Superseding Order, or providing written information to the Department prior to issuance of a Superseding Order. The request shall state clearly and concisely the objections to the Order which is being appealed and how the Order does not contribute to the protection of the interests identified in the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act(M.G.L. c. 131, §40), and is inconsistent with the wetlands regulations (310 CMR 10.00). To the extent that the Order is based on a municipal ordinance or bylaw, and not on the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act or regulations, the Department has no appellate jurisdiction. P' wpa5si,.&° - rev.0212512010 Pa94r�I e °f!ST t L Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands 64-609 WPA Form 5 — Order of Conditions MassDEP File If Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 eDEP Transaction @ Salem . City/Town � G. Recording Information Prior to commencement of work, this Order of Conditions must be recorded in the Registry of Deeds or the Land Court for the district in which the land is located, within the chain of title of the affected property. In the case of recorded land, the Final Order shall also be noted in the Registry's Grantor Index under the name of the owner of the land subject to the Order. In the case of registered land, this Order shall also be noted on the Land Court Certificate of Title of the owner of the land subject to the Order of Conditions. The recording information on this page shall be submitted to the Conservation Commission listed below. Conservation Commission Detach on dotted line, have stamped by the Registry of Deeds and submit to the Conservation Commission. --------------------------------------------— -- To: Conservation Commission s J Please be advised that the Order of Conditions for the Project at: Project Location MassDEP File Number Has been been recorded at the Registry of Deeds of: County Book Page t�• for: Property Owner t and has been noted in the chain of title of the affected property in: Book Page In accordance with the Order of Conditions issued on: Date If recorded land, the instrument number identifying this transaction is: _ --- Instrument Number If registered land, the document number identifying this transaction is: Document Number Signature of Applicant Y wpatorm5.poc• rev,fi/16rz016 Page 12 of 12 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands DEPFileNumber Request for Departmental Action Fee Ir Provided by DEP s Transmittal Form Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 A. Request Information ' 1. Location of Project Ia. Street Address b.Cityrrown,Zip c.Check number d.Fee amount Important: When filling 2 Person or party making request(if appropriate, name the citizengroup's representative): out forms on the computer, Name use only the — tab key to Mailing Address move your CufSOf-d0Cityrrown _ State Zip Code not use the return key. Phone Number Fax Number(if applicable) x r� 3. Applicant(as shown on Determination of Applicability(Form 2), Order of Resource Area Delineation (Form 413), Order of Conditions(Form 5), Restoration Order of Conditions (Form 5A), or Notice of Non-Significance (Form 6)): I Name --- —___--_— _- j „ Mailing Address JCity/rown Stale Zip Code Phone Number Fax Number(if applicable) �- 4. DEP File Number: n a B. Instructions 1. When the Departmental action request is for(check one): ❑ Superseding Order of Conditions— Fee: $120.00(single family house projects)or$245(all other E projects) : ❑ Superseding Determination of Applicability—Fee: $120 ❑ Superseding Order of Resource Area Delineation—Fee: $120 ( wpafoonidoc• rev.4222015 Page 1 of 2 -1 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands DEP File Number: Request for Departmental Action Fee ' '� Provitletl by DEP Transmittal Form Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 B. Instructions (cont.) Send this form and check or money order, payable to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, to: Department of Environmental Protection Box 4062 Boston, MA 02211 2. On a separate sheet attached to this form, state clearly and concisely the objections to the Determination or Order which is being appealed. To the extent that the Determination or Order is based on a municipal bylaw, and not on the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act or regulations, the Department has no appellate jurisdiction. I Send a copy of this form and a copy of the check or money order with the Request for a Superseding Determination or Order by certified mail or hand delivery to the appropriate DEP Regional Office(see http://www.mass.gov/eea/agencies/massdep/about/contacts/). 4. A copy of the request shall at the same time be sent by certified mail or hand delivery to the Conservation Commission and to the applicant, if he/she is not the appellant. t It 3' i { i wpaform5.doc rev.4122/2015 Page 2 0l2 { p s I Artachment to Order of Conditions # 64-609 ' Page 1 of 5 ATTACHMENT TO ORDER OF CONDITIONS SALEM CONSERVATION COMMISSION DEP FILE #64-609 Palmer's Cove Yacht Club 78 Leavitt Street ' City of Salem,Massachusetts ADDITIONAL FINDINGS Based on the Estimated Habitats of Rare Wildlife and Certified Vernal Pools Map (1/7/2016, online) from Natural I-leritage& Endangered Species Program (NHESP) of the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, it has been determined that this project does not occur near any habitat of state-listed rare wildlife species nor contain any vernal pools. ' This order permits maintenance dredging and retention of previously unpermitted structures per approved 11/24/2015 Notice of Intent,approved plans,and the following conditions. i GENERAL CONDITIONS i 1. This Order of Conditions must be recorded in its entirety(including all 5 pages of Special Conditions) at the Essex County Registry of Deeds or the Land Court for the district in which the land is located, after the expiration of the 10-day appeal period and within 30 days of the issuance. A copy of the recording information must be submitted to the Salem Conservation Commission before any work approved in this Order commences. 2. Approval of this application does not constitute compliance with any law or regulation other than M.G.L Chapter 131, Section 40, Wetlands Regulations 310 CMR 10.00 and the City of Salem Wetlands Protection Ordinance, Salem Code Chapter 50. 1 3. All work shall be performed in accordance with this Order of Conditions and approved site plan(s), No q alteration of wetland resource areas or associated buffer zones, other than that approved in this Order, shall occur on this property without prior approval from the Commission. 4. Prior to any work commencing on site, a DEP Sign showing DEP File#64-609 must be installed at the entrance to the site and seen from the public way, but not placed on a living tree. 5. No work approved in this Order may commence until the ten(10)day appeal period has lapsed from the ' date of the issuance of this Order. 6. With respect to this Order, the Commission designates the Conservation Agent as its agent with powers ' to act on its behalf in administering and enforcing this Order. 7. The Commission or its Agent, officers,or employees shall have the right to enter and inspect the property at any time for compliance with the conditions of this Order,the Wetlands Protection Act MGL Chapter 131, Section 40,the Wetlands Regulations 310 CMR 10.00, and shall have the right to require any data or z documentation that it deems necessary for that evaluation. ( Attachment to Order of Conditions # 64-609 '.`y ,.f Page 7 of 5 8. The term "Applicant as used in this Order of Conditions shall refer to the owner, any successor in interest or successor in control of the property referenced in the Notice of intent, supporting documents and this Order of Conditions. The Commission shall be notified in writing within 30 days of all transfers of title of any portion of the property that takes place prior to issuance of the Certificate of Compliance. 9. It is the responsibility of the applicant to procure all other applicable federal, state and local permits and approvals associated with this project. These permits may include but are not necessarily limited to the following: (1) Section 404 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act(P.L. 92-500, 86 stat. 816), U.S.Army Corps of Engineers. (2) Water Quality Certification in accordance with the Federal Water Pollution Control under authority of sec. 27(5) of Chapter 21 of the Massachusetts General Laws as codified in 314 CMR 9.00. (3) Design Requirements for Construction in Floodplains tinder the State Building Code(780 CMR 744.). i 10. If there are conflicting conditions within this Order,the stricter condition(s)shall rule. 11. All work shall be performed so as to ensure that there will be no sedimentation into wetlands and ' surface waters during construction or after completion of the project. 12. The Commission or its Agent shall have the discretion to modify the erosion/siltation control methods and boundary during construction if necessary. 13. The Commission reserves the right to impose additional conditions on portions of this project or this site to mitigate any actual or potential impacts resulting from the work herein permitted. 14. The work shall conform to the following attached plans and special conditions: Final Approved Plans t Palmer Cove Yacht Club, Inc, 74 Leavitt Street, Salem, MA (figures 2-4) (Title) ' 11/23/15 (Darer!) ' Robert 14. Griffin (Signer!and Stamper!by) City of Salem Conservation Commission (On file with) 15. Any proposed changes in the approved plan(s)or any deviation in construction from the approved plan(s)shall require the applicant to file a Notice of Project Change with the Commission. The Notice shall be accompanied by a written inquiry prior to their implementation in the field, as to whether the !� change(s) is substantial enough to require filing a new Notice of Intent or a request to correct or amend this Order of Conditions. A copy of such request shall at the same time be sent to the Department of Environmental Protection. z i' Attachment to Order of Conditions i# 64-609 Page 3 of 5 16. ht conjunction with the sale of this property or any portion thereof before a Certificate of Compliance has been issued,the applicant or current landowner shall submit to the Commission a statement signed by the buyer that he/she is aware of an outstanding Order of Conditions on the property and has received a copy of the Order of Conditions. 17. LReserved]. ' PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION - 18. Prior to the commencement of any activity on this site other than activities listed above,there must be a Pre-Construction Meeting on site between the project supervisor, the contractor responsible for the work,and the Conservation Agent and/or a member of the Conservation Commission to ensure 1 that the requirements of the Order of Conditions are understood. The staked erosion control tine shall be r adjusted, if necessary, during the pre-construction meeting. Please contact the Conservation Agent at (978)619-5685 at least forty-eight(48) hours prior to construction to arrange for the Pre- Construction Meeting. 19- Prior to the pre-construction meeting and commencement of any activity on this site,sedimentation and erosion control barriers shall be installed as shown on the approval plan(s)and detail drawings. The Commission and/or its Agent shall inspect and approve such installation at the pre-construction meeting. 20. No clearing of vegetation, including trees,or disturbance of soil shall occur prior to the pre-construction C meeting. Minimal disturbance of shrubs and herbaceous plants shall be allowed prior to the pre- construction meeting if absolutely necessary in order to place erosion control stakes where required. 21. There shall be adequate additional erosion and sediment controls stored onsite for emergency purposes. E E t EROSION CONTROL 22. Appropriate erosion control devices shall be in place prior to the beginning of any phase of construction, and shall be maintained during construction in any wetland resource area and/or buffer zones. The erosion control measures shown on the approval plan(s)and provisions in the Order will be the minimum standards for this project, the Commission or its Agent may require additional measures. 23. All debris, fill and excavated material shall be stockpiled a location far enough away from the wetland resource areas to prevent sediment from entering wetland resource areas. L 24. Erosion and sedimentation control devices shall be inspected after each storm event and repaired or ' replaced as necessary. Any accumulated silt adjacent to the barriers shall be removed. 25. The area of construction shall remain in a stable condition at the close of each construction day. 26. Any de-watering of trenches or other excavation required during construction shall be conducted so as to prevent siltation of wetland resource areas. All discharge from de-watering activities shall be filtered through straw bale sediment naps, silt filter bags or other means approved by the Commission or its Administrator. 27. Within thirty (30)days of completion of construction on any given portion of the project,all disturbed areas in the completed portion of the site shall be permanently stabilized with rapidly growing vegetative cover, using sufficient top soil to assure long-term stabilization of disturbed areas. 1 x L.rx_ Attachment to Order of Conditions # 64-609 Page 4 of 5 28. If soils are to be disturbed for longer than two(2)months, a temporary cover of rye or other grass should be established to prevent erosion and sedimentation. If the season is not appropriate for plant growth,exposed surface shall be stabilized by other appropriate erosion control measures,firmly anchored,to prevent soils from being washed by rain or flooding. DURING CONSTRUCTION 29. A copy of this Order of Conditions and the plan(s)approved in this Order shall be available of site at all times when work is in progress. 30. No alteration or activity shall occur beyond the limit of work as defined by the siltation barriers shown on the approved plan(s). 3]. All waste products, grubbed stumps,slash;construction materials,eta. shall be deposited at least 100 feet from wetland resource areas and 200 feet from river. 32. Cement trucks shall not be washed out in any wetland resource or buffer zone area,nor into any drainage system. Any deposit of cement or concrete products into a buffer zone or wetland resource area shall be ' immediately removed. 33. All exposed sub-soils shall be covered by a minimum of three(3) inches of quality screened loam topsoil prior to seeding and final stabilization. F 34. Immediately following drainage structure installation all inlets shall be protected by silt fence,strawbale barriers and/or silt bags to filter silt from stormwater before it enters the drainage system. 35. . There shall be no pumping of water from wetland resource areas. 36. All equipment shall be inspected regularly for leaks. Any leaking hydraulic lines,cylinders or any other £� components shall be fixed immediately. 37. During construction,all drainage structures shall be inspected regularly and cleaned as necessary. ' 38. The applicant is herby notified that failure to comply with all requirements herein may result in the issuance of enforcement actions by the Conservation Commission including, but not limited to, civil administrative penalties under M.G.L Chapter 21 A, section 16. r AFTER CONSTRUCTION 6 39. Upon completion of construction and final soil stabilization, the applicant shall submit the following to the Conservation Commission to request a Certificate of Compliance (COC): 1 (1) A Completed Request for a Certificate of Compliance form(WPA Form 8A-or other form if ' required by the Conservation Commission at the time of request). (2) A letter from a Registered Professional Engineer certifying compliance of the property with this Order of Conditions. (3) An"As-Built"plan signed and stamped by a Registered Professional Engineer or Land Surveyor showing post-construction conditions within all areas under the jurisdiction of the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act. This plan shall include at a minimum: (a) All wetland resource area boundaries with associated buffer zones and regulatory setback areas taken from the plan(s)approved in this Order of Conditions; .� e ' y°''i ti Attachment to Order of Conditions # 64-609 IFiE Page J of (b) Locations and elevations of all stormwater management conveyances,structures and best management designs, including foundation drains,constructed under this Order within any wetland resource area or buffer zone; ' (c) Distances from any structures constructed under this Order to wetland resource areas- "structures"include, but are not limited to,all buildings,septic system components,wells, utility lines, fences,retaining walls,and roads/driveways; ' (d) A line delineating the limit of work-"work"includes any filling,excavating and/or disturbance of soils or vegetation approved under this Order; 40. When issued,the Certificate of Compliance must be recorded at the Essex County Registry of Deeds and a copy of the recording submitted to the Salem Conservation Commission. ' 41. if the completed work differs from that in the original plans and conditions,the report must specify how the work differs; at which time the applicant shall first request a modification to the Order. Only upon review and approval by the Commission, may the applicant request in writing a Certificate of Compliance as described above. 42. Erosion control devices shall remain in place and properly functioning until all exposed soils have been stabilized with final vegetative cover and the Conservation Commission and/or its Agent has authorized ' their removal. i ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS 43. The project shall be completed in accordance with all commitments made in 1/7/2016 letter"RE: Palmers Cove Dredge Project"from Luke Fabbri to the Salem Conservation Commission. 44. A turbidity curtain shall be utilized during all dredging activity. ' E t r E l P M1 f 1 1 APPENDIX B ' 1 1 1 D m z 0 X m 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r PUBLIC OFFICIALS Mayor Kimberley Driscoll Salem City Hall ' 93 Washington Street Salem,MA 01970 ' STATE AGENCIES EOEEA Secretary Matthew A. Beaton Attn: MEPA Office 100 Cambridge Street,Suite 900 Boston,MA 02114 Department of Environmental Protection Commissioner's Office One Winter Street Boston,MA 02108 Department of Environmental Protection ' Northeast Regional office Attn:MEPA Coordinator 205B Lowell Street Wilmington,MA 01887 Department of Environmental Protection Waterways Regulatory Program One Winter Street Boston,MA 02108 Office of Coastal Zone Management ' Attn:Project Review Coordinator 251 Causeway Street,Suite 800 Boston,MA 02114 ' Division of Marine Fisheries(North Shore) Atm: Environmental Reviewer 30 Emerson Avenue Gloucester,MA 01930 i Executive Office of Transportation Attn:Environmental Reviewer 10 Park Plaza,Room 3510 Boston,MA 02116-3969 Massachusetts Highway Department Attn:MEPA Coordinator 519 Appleton Street Arlington,MA 02476 ' Massachusetts Historical Commission The MA Archives Building 220 Morrissey Boulevard ' Boston,MA 02125 Metropolitan Area Planning Council ' 60 Temple Place/6th floor Boston,MA 02111 1 r CITY OF SALEM r City Council 93 Washington Street Salem,MA 01970 Planning Board 120 Washington Street,3rd Floor ' Salem,MA 01970 Conservation Commission 120 Washington Street,3,d Floor r Salem,MA 01970 Board of Health 120 Washington Street,4m Floor r Salem,MA 01970 1 r r 1 1 1 1 i r i 1 1 1