The URL can be used to link to this page

485 LAFAYETTE STREET - ZONING Form B—Glover Estates—485 Lafayette A _ II I APPLICATION i A2 Friday,April 22,2005 THE SALEM NEWS 44 condos planned. for Lead Mills site By TOM DALTON The threat of a lawsuit forced STAFF WRITER the developer into a`defensive' position,"Sawyer said. SALEM—A Boston developer As a result,Sawyer said K.S.S. submitted a preliminary plan last decided on a so-called 40B develop- night to build 44 condominiums at ment,which requires that 20 to 25 the former Chadwick Lead Mills percent of the condos be affordable site on Lafayette Street.The two- and sold at lower prices.Afford- bedroom condos will be sold for able housing will also let the de- anywhere from$180,000 to$1 mil- veloper skirt most of the local ap- lion,the developer said. proval process, something the The incredibly wide range of state allows in order to encourage prices is due to the complex nature more lower-cost homes.An afford- and controversial history of this able housing project also will put project,which sits on the Salem- the developer in a stronger posi- Marblehead border. tion in a court fight,Sawyer said. The contaminated 4-acre water- All ofthe affordable condos willbe front site is ownedby Richard Bane, built in Marblehead because the a North Shore nursing home owner town does not meet the minimum who tried to build an assisted-living level of affordable housing required complex here.He finally abandoned by the state.Salem meets the state's his plans after facing neighborhood 10 percent standard opposition and the threat of lengthy K.S.S.also pledged to clean up litigation the'site,which is contaminated Bane has a tentative deal to sell with lead from mills that operated the property to KS.S.Realty Part- here as far back as the 1800s. ners,which filed its preliminary K.S.& came before the Salem plan with the Salem Planning board last night to review its plans Board last night.K.S.S.representa- for an entry road,cul-de-sac and tives said they wanted to build a turning lanes on Lafayette Street, smaller,30-condo project but gave all on Salem land. Several board up due to neighborhood opposition. members raised concerns about ."Everybody liked it with the ex- the traffic impact on that section of ception of five neighbors," said Lafayette, which has been the John Sawyer Jr,vice president for scene of numerous accidents,in- development at K.S.S. "And the cluding one this week neighbors who opposed it made it The developer will submit the absolutely clear(they)are going to 40B plan in Marblehead next sue(us)every step of the way." month,Sawyer said. oclde Page A4 ewsTHE FLIGHTS OF STARLING G LE - TRIBUNE COMPANY BURGESS We North,Page BI s paytoattention 'vers. according to police.The 88-year-old was he said."It's that simple. later charged,and police said he may have put your cell phone away been distracted because he was filling a to on the road and your dri- pipe with tobacco as he drove. Roffey allegedly struck Frost at 30 mph. old patrolman was working He was tossed on the hood of the sedan r detail when Carlton Roffey and thrown 25 feet. ored 200 feet of bright or- tion cones and struck him, Please see FROST,Page A10 / Peabody Fire Department roto ot • his penalty Lawyer: 911 dispatcher was allowed to sleep on the job Valerie Gingrich From: Frank Taormina Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 9:26 AM To: Valerie Gingrich Subject: RE: Lead Mills Yes, the roadway will require grading (which is considered altering or disturbing land in the buffer) and the subdivision is for four or more residential units so it will also trigger having to file a DEP Stormwater Management Form with the NOI. Also the site is disturbing more than an acre of land so the applicant would also need to file a NPDES Stormwater Permit with the EPA. If they are phasing the development they will need to file an NOI for the Roadway and then an NOI for the buildings that will occupy the site. Frank Taormina,Planner/Conservation Agent Department of Planning&Community Development City Hall Annex 120 Washington Street Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Phone: 978.745.9595 Ext. 311 Fax: 978.740.0404 Email: ftaormina(&salem.com 1 (42,4, afflu of Salm, 'Mttssar4nutts (®ne �xiem green �✓rNvk 1 t �''� REQUEST FOR REVIEW COMMENTS PRELIMINARY EFINITIVE SUBDIVISION PLANS DATE: .AlY21t, 13 2exS" TO: ( ) BUILDING INSPECTOR %CONSERVATION COMMISSION ( ) CITY ENGINEER ( ) @ �+�E ?Ii�BJE►SRet1 ( ) BOARD OF HEALTH Attached please find the application referenced below. The Planning Board requests that you review this application relative to the City of Salem Subdivision Regulations and MGL Chapter 41. We would appreciate your completing the form below and returning it to us. X PRELIMINARY PLAN ( ) DEFINIITIVE PLAN APPLICANT: - PROJECT NAME & ADDRESS: �BS`ldl1!AN�fT S'tfvT CONTACT PERSONS AND PHONE: Applicant: CITY: COMMENTS DUE BY: ( ) Concur with proposal (Explain on reverse side) ( ) Need more information (Explain on reverse side) \O/Cannot concur with proposal (Explain on reverse side) Q< Comments included //eek lb ��"` 0'F +�,Sc' / \ //c��i lon 'ca✓d�U�l /4XvL 7��bs REVIEW 'S SIGNATU E TITLE ✓ DATE imWMSUBnAN.APP mAP--o((Co LIST OF (300') ABUTTERS LAFAYETTE STREET MARBLEHEAD, MASSACHUSETTS August 26, 2004 MARBLEHEAD LOCUS MAP Lot Parcel Location Owner Reference 55 1 0 Forest River Glover Estates LLC C 70967 55 3 0 Forest River 28 Essex Street C 70967 Lynn, MA 01902 SALEM LOCUS MAP Lot Parcel Location Owner Reference 31 0237 0 485 Lafayette Street Glover Estates LLC 70967/365 28 Essex Street Lynn, MA 01902 MARBLEHEAD ABUTTERS MAP Lot Parcel Location Owner Reference 55 2 0 Forest River Town of Marblehead 5537/60 Electric Light Department 80 Commercial Street Marblehead, MA 01945 55 4 0 157 Lafayette Street Rosemary C. Brennan 760/591 157 Lafayette Street Marblehead, MA 01945 55 5 0 153 Lafayette Street Steven H. & Nancy A. Lipsky 16534/370 153 Lafayette Street Marblehead, MA 01945 55 6 0 6 Carna Road John A. & Patricia Donovan 5354/173 6 Cama Road Marblehead, MA 01945 55 7 0 70 Robert Road Suzanne E. &Alfred S. Gibney 10037/92 70 Robert Road Marblehead, MA 01945 List of Marblehead and Salem Abutters (300') Lafayette Street, Marblehead, MA August 26, 2004 MAP Lot Parcel Location Owner Reference 55 8 0 74 Robert Road Richard S. Bennett 21921/180 7715 E. Entrada Deventana Tucson, AZ 85750 55 9 0 76 Robert Road Michael & Stella Haliotis 10082/561 P. O. Box 662 Marblehead, MA 01945 55 9A 0 80 Robert Road D & H Realty Trust 11748/328 David Haliotis, Tr. P. O. Box 377 Lynn, MA 01903 55 10 0 84 Robert Road Robert I. & Merna R. Kalis 7769/281 84 Robert Road Marblehead, MA 01945 55 11 0 83 Robert Road Bradley S. Levin 16500/260 83 Robert Road Marblehead, MA 01945 55 12 0 79 Robert Road Mark & Ellen Bresner 8345/360 79 Robert Road Marblehead, MA 01945 55 13 0 71 Robert Road Robert J. Nobrega 10840/190 71 Robert Road Marblehead, MA 01945 55 14 0 65 Robert Road David C. Bagley 5425/717 65 Robert Road Marblehead, MA 01945 55 15 0 36 Arthur Avenue Augustin H. Parker, III & 9347/489 Angela Munro Parker 36 Arthur Avenue Marblehead, MA 01945 55 16 0 38 Arthur Avenue Priscilla L. Doliber 4366/292 12279 S.W. Kingsway Circle Lake Suzy, FL 34266 55 17 0 41 Arthur Avenue Richard C. &Tami L. Bane 18188/213 41 Arthur Avenue Marblehead, MA 01945 55 18 0 35 Arthur Avenue Paul & Christina Reulbach 16270/435 35 Arthur Avenue Marblehead, MA 01945 List of Marblehead and Salem Abutters (300') Lafayette Street, Marblehead, MA August 26, 2004 MAP Lot Parcel Location Owner Reference 55 19 0 33 Arthur Avenue Stuart A. Cohen & 10095/100 Anne M. Lucas 33 Arthur Avenue Marblehead, MA 01945 55 20 0 Arthur Avenue 41A Arthur Ave. Realty Trust 17266/220 Martha Brophy, Trustee 121 Loring Avenue Salem, MA 01970 37 5 1 150 Lafayette Street Peter Beesley& 19583/337 Carol V. Booth-Beesley 150 Lafayette Street, Unit 1 Marblehead, MA 01945 37 5 2 152 Lafayette Street Ann Fothergill 14557/501 152 Lafayette Street, Unit 2 Marblehead, MA 01945 37 6 3 154 Lafayette Street Ronald K. &Joanne E. Olson 11768/165 154 Lafayette Street, Unit 3 Marblehead, MA 01945 37 6 4 156 Lafayette Street Christopher&Jeannine Haley 19482/472 16 Club House Drive Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 59 10 0 Lafayette Street Town of Marblehead --- Rec. & Park Dept. 10 Humphrey Street Marblehead, MA 01945 54 26 0 32 Arthur Avenue Edward D. & Millicent Thomas 18876/148 32 Arthur Avenue Marblehead, MA 01945 SALEM ABUTTERS MAP Lot Parcel Location Owner Reference 31 0234 0 467 Lafayette Street Town of Marblehead 5763/720 31 0233 0 463 Lafayette Street Water& Sewer Comm. 5803/303 P. O. Box 1108 Marblehead, MA 01945 List of Marblehead and Salem Abutters (300') Lafayette Street, Marblehead, MA August 26, 2004 MAP Lot Parcel Location Owner Reference 31 0235 0 465 Lafayette Street Conservation Commission 6472/589 31 0236 0 467 Lafayette Street 93 Washington Street 6472/589 31 0335 0 478 Lafayette Street Salem, MA 01970 6472/589 31 0238 0 476 Lafayette Street Frederick Jr. & Pauline Harney 48450/220 31 0240 0 474 Lafayette Street 476 Lafayette Street 6437/758 Salem, MA 01970 31 0239 0 470 Lafayette Street Daniel F. Sr. & Diane Connolly 4680/288 21 Adams Street Lynn, MA 01902 31 0241 0 1 Rosedale Avenue Alice L. Johnson 9558/211 1 Rosedale Avenue Salem, MA 01970 31 0242 0 3 Rosedale Avenue Raymond L. Jr. & Bonnie Muse 6335/681 3 Rosedale Avenue Salem, MA 01970 31 0243 0 5 Riverway Road Harrison Family LTD Partnshp. 13419/455 15 Rowland Street Marblehead, MA 01945 31 0244 0 7 Riverway Road PHOC Nominee Trust 5687/317 Peter& Patricia O'Conner, Trs. 7 Riverway Road Salem, MA 01970 31 0325 0 9 Riverway Road Forest River Beach Club, Inc. 9370/234 c/o Ruth Larivee 4 Sunset Road Salem, MA 01970 Patriot Properties (/ Salem 08/26/2004 Abutters List 12:15:20PM RECEIVED AUG 2 6 2004 DEPT.OF PLANING& COMMUNITY DEVENLOPMENT Filter Used: DataProperty.ParcellD='31-0237-0'OR DataProperty.ParcellD='31-0233-0'OR DataProperty.ParcellD='31-0234-0'OR DataProperty.ParcellD= '31-0235-0'OR DataProperty.ParcellD='31-0236-0.. u 9 a i v { 95".LOP �.r ,� Abutters r ParcellD Location Owner Co-Owner Mailing Address City State Zip 31-0233-0 463 LAFAYETTE STREET MARBLEHEAD TOWN OF WATER&SEWER COMMIS P O BOX 1108 MARBLEHEAD MA 01945 31-0234-0 467 REAR LAFAYETTE STREET MARBLEHEAD TOWN OF WATER&SEWER COMMIS P O BOX 1108 MARBLEHEAD MA 01945 31-0235-0 465 LAFAYETTE STREET SALEM CONSERVATION COMM MA 31-0236-0 467 LAFAYETTE STREET SALEM CONSERVATION COMM MA 31-0237-0 485 LAFAYETTE STREET GLOVER ESTATES LLC 28 ESSEX ST LYNN MA 01902 31-0238-0 476 LAFAYETTE STREET HARNEY FREDERICK J JR PAULINE R 474 LAFAYETTE ST SALEM MA 01970 31-0240-0 474 LAFAYETTE STREET HARNEY FREDERICK J JR PAULINE R 474 LAFAYETTE ST SALEM MA 01970 31-0335-0 478 LAFAYETTE STREET SALEM CONSERVATION COMM SALEM CITY OF MA End of Report ofttlem, Htt�sttriise##s �Ytf �$#Ettt �gTEEI[ REQUEST FOR REVIEW COMMENTS PRELIMINARY EFINITIVE SUBDIVISION PLANS DATE: Aivztl 13 'LAS—' TO: BUILDING INSPECTOR ONSERVATION COMMISSION ITY ENGINEER a F~�E fR�*IEl�Tt61� BOARD OF HEALTH Attached please find the application referenced below. The Planning Board requests that you review this application relative to the City of Salem Subdivision Regulations and MGL Chapter 41. We would appreciate your completing the form below and returning it to us. X PRELIMINARY PLAN ( ) DEFINIITIVE PLAN APPLICANT: ( I ovr" g�►°rrl✓S I-l.�- PROJECT NAME & ADDRESS: Q�$�`/�A�AM6XT'i� S'1W'iT— CONTACT PERSONS AND PHONE: Applicant: CITY: COMMENTS DUE BY: O Concur with proposal (Explain on reverse side) ( ) Need more information (Explain on reverse side) O Cannot concur with proposal (Explain on reverse side) ( ) Comments included REVIEWER'S SIGNATURE TITLE DATE jm\DH\SUBPIAN.APP C111' OF SALEM. MA CLERK'S OFFICE (9i#g of $atem,, f flassa rouse##s 4u $ 1005 MAR 31 P I: 18 �Hp �Iau - o$alwt, �lsrsacl[ustHs 0147!1 RECEIVED FORM B MAR 3 1 2005 APPLICATION FOR TENTATIVE APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAN DEPT. OF PLANNING& In accordance with the provisions of Section III-A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT the applicant must file; by delivery or registered mail, a Notice with the City Clerk stating the date of the submission for such determination. The no- lice shall be attached to two copies of this Form B application. The notice and both copies of the appli- cation must be"date stamped"by the City Clerk and then one copy of this Form B, with the Plan, filed with the Planning Board by the applicant. All notices and applications shall be typewritten or neatly printed in ink. Salem, Mass., Iiarch..3.I-----------_-------------ice-2995 To the Planning Board: The Undersigned herewith submits the accompanying Preliminary Plan of property located in the City of Salem for tentative approval as a subdivision as allowed under the Subdivision Control Law and the Rules and Regulations Governing the Subdivision of Land of the Planning Board in the City of Salem. 1. Name of Subdivider Glover Estates, LLC — — — — — — Address __?g ..... .....—....._..---_------•_-----_. 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor Hayes Engineering, Itic.-- -- - -------- ----------------------------------------------- Address -59.3._ 1880-_.-_•-•..----._-.--............. 3. Deed of property recorded in Essex_-SnuLh._IIisrsict--------------------------__---------------- Registry, Land. Court Certificate No. 70967 Document No. 240325 4. Location and Description of Property: .485.3 afayEisa_SixEEi__nDm_J sY�g_nf_______________.... 156,800 s.P. of vacant land in Salem and Marblehead. ..............—...— — — ---••---••—•---•--•---•--•----------------------------------- -----------------••------ — —......—......----_-----.................. —....--—— — — — — — 5. All streets and abutting lot lines shall be shown on the P it t to names and addresses of the abutting Owners. Ge.r r Est s e, Signature of —ki s III, sAddress 59 Cd _ee ,_�alem,- M 83�------------ Telephone Number_(218) 744-0350 A list of the names and addresses of the abutters of this subdivision is attached, which shall be attested to.by the surveyor. Verification will be made by the Planning Board. CIT'i OF SALEM. MA CLERK'S OFFICE ag IIf Salem'. f assar4usetts P $ 2gnarD 1005 MAR 31 P 1: 18 RECEIVED� FORM B MAR 3 1 2005 APPLICATION FOR TENTATIVE APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAN DEPT. OF PLANNING& In accordance with the provisions of Section III-A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT the applicant must file, by delivery or registered mail, a Notice with the City Clerk stating the date of the submission for such determination. The no- lice shall be attached to two copies of this Form B application. The notice and both copies of the appli- cation must be"date stamped"by the City Clerk and then one copy of this Form B, with the Plan, filed with the Planning Board by the applicant. All notices and applications shall be typewritten or neatly printed in ink. Salem, Mass., March-31.—._—_............. To the Planning Board: The Undersigned herewith submits the accompanying Preliminary Plan of property located in the City of Salem for tentative approval as a subdivision as allowed under the Subdivision Control Law and the Mules and Regulations Governing the Subdivision of Land of the Planning Board in the City of Salem. 1. Name of Subdivider Glover Estates, LLC ------------------------------- Address _7S Essex_R rPei�.Lyna�_M4.D19A2.._-------------------._-- 2. ]Fame of Engineer or Surveyor Hayes Engineering, Iiic:- Address fig3_.a&1r5 S _4kef1A2_L.M_4_01880 3. Deed of property recorded in Essex_.Souih IIisi=icL_....._.____-.___.—____.. _ Registry, Land. Court Certificate No. 70967 Document No. 240325 4. Location and Description of Property: .......__..-.... _• 156,800_"s.f. of vacant land in Salem and Marblehead. 5. All streets and abutting lot lines shall be shown on the P r e names and addresses of the abutting Owners. Gl r Est s C ;-1 Signature of �FF_-ii-� --- -. :1 59 Cdeor k'gsalemi'MAs8y4 a Address —e_e s—a —_--.-- Telephone Number (978) 744-0350 A list of the names and addresses of the abutters of this subdivision is attached, which shall be attested to by the surveyor. Verification will be made by the Planning Board. i DECISION • w CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD Form B — Decision May 6, 2005 c s mC Glover Estates, LLC X C/o George W. Atkins III, Esquire 59 Federal Street of -n rn r1 Salem, MA 01970 � � Y RE: Decision for the Preliminary Subdivision Plan for Glover Estates Subdivision —.Form B Dear Attorney Atkins: On April 21, 2005, and May 19, 2005 the Salem Planning Board held public meetings to discuss the preliminary subdivision plan submitted by Glover Estates, LLC for the parcel located on Lafayette Street (Map 31, Lot 237). On May 5, 2005, the Planning Board voted by a vote of six in favor (Power, Durand, Moustakis, Sullivan, Collins, Ready), and none opposed, to approve the preliminary subdivision plan. Furthermore, the Salem Planning Board requests that the following information be submitted with the application for a Definitive Subdivision Plan (This information is in addition to the required information for submitting a Definitive Subdivision Plan): 1. The plan should show the access way(s) off of the proposed cul de sac. 2. The plan should show the proposed buildings 3. The houses on the other side of Lafayette Street should be shown on the plan 4. A detailed plan describing proposed roadway improvements be submitted. 5. A detailed plan of the proposed cleanup of the parcels 6. A traffic study, which includes information concerning the traffic impacts on the area from development of the entire site. 7. A construction traffic management plan I hereby certify that a copy of this decision and plans are on file with the City Clerk and a copy is on file with the Planning Board. Sincerely, wjjx'%�FD7�11VG Walter B. Power, III Chairman 120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 w TEL: 978.745.9595 FAx: 978.740.0404 ♦ WWW.SALEM.COM • w CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD Form B — Decision May 6, 2005 0- 0 c Glover Estates, LLC Gn C/o George W. Atkins III, Esquire 59 Federal Street CY- T Salem, MA 01970 ➢ 3 � Y RE: Decision for the Preliminary Subdivision Plan for Glover Estates Subdivision—.Form B ;w Dear Attorney Atkins: On April 21, 2005, and May 19, 2005 the Salem Planning Board held public meetings to discuss the preliminary subdivision plan submitted by Glover Estates, LLC for the parcel located on Lafayette Street (Map 31,Lot 237). On May 5, 2005, the Planning Board voted by a vote of six in favor(Power, Durand, Moustakis, Sullivan, Collins, Ready), and none opposed, to approve the preliminary subdivision plan. Furthermore, the Salem Planning Board requests that the following information be submitted with the application for a Definitive Subdivision Plan (This information is in addition to the required information for submitting a Definitive Subdivision Plan): 1. The plan should show the access way(s) off of the proposed cul de sac. 2. The plan should show the proposed buildings 3. The houses on the other side of Lafayette Street should be shown on the plan 4. A detailed plan describing proposed roadway improvements be submitted. 5. A detailed plan of the proposed cleanup of the parcels 6. A traffic study, which includes information concerning the traffic impacts on the area from development of the entire site. 7. A construction traffic management plan I hereby certify that a copy of this decision and plans are on file with the City Clerk and a copy is on file with the Planning Board. Sincerely, 2 V& Walter B. Power, III Chairman 120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 w TEL: 978.745.9595 FAx: 978.740.0404 0 WWW.SALEM.COM CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD Form B — Decision May 6, 2005 C)=' r'c Glover Estates, LLC C/o George W. Atkins III, Esquire1 cn T 59 Federal Street 6 C3 T Salem, MA 01970 Q v RE: Decision for the Preliminary Subdivision Plan for Glover Estates Subdivision —.Form B .:W Dear Attorney Atkins: On April 21, 2005, and May 19, 2005 the Salem Planning Board held public meetings to discuss the preliminary subdivision plan submitted by Glover Estates, LLC for the parcel located on Lafayette Street (Map 31,Lot 237). On May 5, 2005, the Planning Board voted by a vote of six in favor (Power, Durand, Moustakis, Sullivan, Collins, Ready), and none opposed, to approve the preliminary subdivision plan. Furthermore, the Salem Planning Board requests that the following information be submitted with the application for a Definitive Subdivision Plan (This information is in addition to the required information for submitting a Definitive Subdivision Plan): 1. The plan should show the access way(s) off of the proposed cul de sac. 2. The plan should show the proposed buildings 3. The houses on the other side of Lafayette Street should be shown on the plan 4. A detailed plan describing proposed roadway improvements be submitted. 5. A detailed plan of the proposed cleanup of the parcels 6. A traffic study, which includes information concerning the traffic impacts on the area from development of the entire site. 7. A construction traffic management plan I hereby certify that a copy of this decision and plans are on file with the City Clerk and a copy is on file with the Planning Board. Sincerely, Y w,a 7&' .al VG Walter B. Power, III Chairman 120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 . TEL: 978.745.9595 FAx: 978.740.0404 ♦ WWW.SALEM.COM ,� _-.-�._...._,.,_.�, .,_r_.__ _„-�-.� � - ____.•_� _JJJJ__--.-_,_- - - 1 ILAND ' SIJB.IECT TO COASTAL STORM FLOWAGE FOR SALEM HARBOR 1 (ELEVATION 14.0) FEMA V-4 ZONE (MARBLEHEAD) • � I� - _.......... ._ ••. --�. / •- ^•��.�__/!! rim r/J�. ,r .� :�� -r : ��: 1 ' .' _ '-� :.:�� .. :...-..:•:� ,i:�.:.,i-_•,�_' RIM-21.D2 SMH ! rr - ±�`_ l � JJJ !=-' =: •"• .t: ----.--.- - __ _ .._.. =r -�i .�s•�i7s �� 'r`�' 1R`WI Si `.•� •• v u•....+.•T►s+-•..••+••••.•••••+• M1/�1592 SALEM I�[�1RBOR l/1 r}•I _ ..� r '� - _- _ •_ _ ,-• :- ._-.� -'� •�•:.' �•� _ � :.•`' �"•�'� _ _- A' ! r r - .r \ `err'r/.i ^'� -rr rrl r,rQ' _.c •.. :�'"' •+ rrr '' goo :• i ir+•�- '..•.•.,...• • • •+••+_ '� -�+•' ,,..::;.:^' :t..\ NUN .•• 1 .•^ JJJJ •• ••••++•+•••++• ! r r 1 r'rr rr rr // /r /, /, r i��%r �' r,' •,�:i�r�..4• •••••++++ t- •.\ ( ••+•i•�.• �.� ell te Af I r r/ r r/ r r r r .r•'. , ��/ r^•`jar-�' .+'•t.-••. �K- !� ••+••• �, �.'+' // \ LAND SUBJECT TO COASTAL r / / r r r r r r / r r/r +.•+ \ �• +• r - --r / \ \ STORM FLOWAGE FOR SALEM HARBOR �►�� r r /'!' it5�Cho�Q epp .tom_ EVATON 14.0) / I - r�r r r r r r�.i %i/�` �ar ":: r N'\ Jt /•/ •\•\l • 20 FEMA V3 ZONE(SALEM) ,/ r r\ \ �•� _ �' r r r „► • • J r, - �� , rrr � r , , / .. ��+r rrr .'\• ?!.. 9 � ••+S r+' -(`•]- y / r r r ^�� ` -4F7 + .- /r � r rlr,�, / .-!/ ! /'�r�i r �Y _-.a•..�� -r••+• /...J /I :•• // , w01[ _ r r/ rrr ••� i f �1 ♦ ..�.... - ti- Q • ._- _ .••.. ! -r // ..•." i r '� � ��.. +•• / r ••• / �'�, _rrr � ..-' , \ 21 � .. ♦.. �� dS'�_ 0 - � � • � r D i ! ,J '.� ��r r�' •r r•r'r.- `•Y•��rrrr ,� •• !I � ! '! r�,�r r � �� '�•/ r .,,..^'r" �;\ � +C.it�•a� 1�� ti _ f J 23 �. •-.r YtT�•'Q' i - - •-r .i -♦�+�� \! ! t \ - /•• / /� rrr r J r r 2 -r//- ^�•`J -•�' r r r r \ / \ • 1• _ y� ha�.•.d:::�t .� '••'t'.v• r1 �� r--,,.. � _ - C!' � ��• r• •� +•�•k•• ! �• �•i• / / 'r r' � .. JJJJ p..►e,"•. ?.. � _.�.� ... - _ � � •r.�' J r • / r _ _ :►r' / / � }, •t.,+.;�.+"• •• 'w'qi....� ..::• :,; ,••� �' - ... � _ -��i - �(��'ftlF � r • v \ •: ! / - r !I'/ r'• r ..':� •"S'...r•r+ r � - ALL•-• ...�•�:s...ir...1 ^'~ �.+r� Q' \ f r+^ 1 1 r - /��^�.•,�� J r r " ' r. -- '' ... _, ! -'�``' ` _ ..t�..S;: :.� •'� f.x 't'�''t-.i.� r ! -'� r � -�v - 1 ,'x` \~� ••�•••`•+•• \ , , _ / ! it Vii„ �'' "' _y 2ti '/Jr 27 ^ /� !I '_/ /' `� ., ^- _-..�� _.��•`�- � � � 1 ! ( � I _ ''� ,' / ,♦ l r ir' .F.`•'� //�' \/ ', `111`� - =r- =-_ '�� ,r-�___ _ = �_ -- - ;,-� , �l..f�, _ , .__•. ,�_- ;.�; LOT 2 ♦/ii41\/i'' �\ `liriir // /// J^! I 1 1=__ _ ��1i� ' t/� f �••'•r ✓ -+_+>r++t`�- 12 �+, \\ '. `\\\\\\\ ,� �`��/ / \� 123,700E S.F. / -^- - _ - 2s ! t ! 1 FoutmAT10N_WrALILS / `♦.. ! ( ••�♦ \ /// / / ./ / / /+• r.. 1 i rrJr I \ r t • - + • r- ♦ _ ♦ ! ".x.31 \ / ! J�J ! 1 1/ , ^( J 1 '�-•100-FOOT TO \ . ♦ `+�+► r -/J� 'r t / I \ / - 30 "U,�� r 'r' ' { / / / J / r 1 1 i l I +l'� q\� +j LAND SUB,ECT TO COASI'Al 1 }! ! w ! J J/ 1 ! ! J J JJJJ -' 31 /, ! / / I A , +•:•l \ STORM FLOWAG� FOR THE fOREB'1"I�VER ^� h / ! /!/j/,\ __� / ✓ /'- r" 32 -- `\ /r _ r' r } /' SMH_ r //o MEASURED 100 FEET�y� A 10.0 1 e� t - / r •/ /�''' / / J t / 111IU11r \ ! � /� / \ tr , ey` ,i ,� j vtus' / / 33 / MIN1505 or Le i ,J II i t r1 P � 1 / ,• . \ � ► 1 j 1,1 j! / 1 ,/ / t q�• i' r J/le - /%%%, /! ,/ ,//! ! /� ,ry \� Ill off t _8i/ ,' 1,•�•�� _ / I // /' , -_! ,1 / /!/, ! ! \ 1 t \\ J / / / _ i , r SMH •. ► / ! ! 1- y ! / I t t 1 TM-29.38 , _ J'/'/J�JI J iJ r !J J /J i 1,111 / I ! 1 1 ••• ; 100' PUFFER FROM [,§.C.S.F. J)J,.! !r /► t t 1 t� t �, \\ MIN—.- r/ „ „ - - -= _- _ -_ r •or -_ = �, !�J//i r 1 1 1 I ! ! / 11 1 f+1,,/ !/ / 1 0. •• .:. 13.95 (MARBLEHEAD CON.CCIM.) /' I 1 tt , _ r r "1w 1? —: '_� _-- =? �i �'_ _g9— —— — — — — �`� i -- �/r/%/' ! I t { I ! t t ! 11 III / ! i '� •• •••• ti • ' // /1 (! 1 J''/,OHO t1 1 I r r' '� /,r / ',' ♦ `� tt �I1 t ' t t I I I ` II Irl � ! 1 �, I , I � .. � .- , yt- I I J / rr-' _ - ="'sem_- ---_- ---- -- 1� \\ 1 1 ', 1 \\ ! i I , / 1 i {� • / r' rrr ��t 1 f I i \ r1 r',' / /' '_r' _ � �.�-r^�� - ---•------ J \\ � � �� t f (l f ! ♦ i Iri ! +� � / / , / / I� { r /r, / / �r / - I!I- �•r''. _ __ _'..' _--_ -__ -_ " I /I'I /J , LOT 1JSM►ir � .�' / 1 ! !1 rr// r' ' r -_= t��s�; ! _ g ; 3,1,100± S.F►I• /.4 _ // �. J, , , - s _. � 1 �� t 1 t ! / 111 r I I V • f •J S I ,i'r / .y/ ri• //�4'�'i i r r i'r r �•�rr;'r �QOg��*,t1 11 ( { !/ / ; 1 ! , 1 I • t / % , \ - / /r r r //r r r/ ri/ r r r ►�l+ i1�cJ � 111 1 1 t t / I\ ;r �r.. !,•- — -- /-' "� •S .. ��\ \ � t • I/ w � t ! / / ,•'r ... / /JJJ,, l \\ ///! /Zoll! // / 1 �� '♦_ t, I ! . /i/j// j i •' •; s'` /'// 1�J1►! ��/!!!!JJJJ �r \\\\ � } .: � / V�Q w //// _� !C Q/ J • �� ! � / ,!! toll //////// /� \\ r J 1 2 F I / [C •• J t f !! Q l�l/ WRQ ! . t !v/ice /rJ JIr met err'► \ � p i . IIfI1 1 � mip ..• � JJ / ,/ ,14 _ � �/,�jj1��" /// �G �.�' I lift 0 :�`l L. �l\\. �J / � III 1 9 .1 dI Q {...�• � I i / ! / , / r' ^^•.�✓,rr r',/- /! / r.�n-Mawlf ✓ l /1 / 1 1]ft /' \ 4rl / / ;/ J/ , /i/i /x`�l� r 1rr•'' � w�s O R'tIAY 3 OUtF ' �' , ♦ / / r: /�✓ , !irk r////i-r. -=. \ lANDI$(IfE>�CT 1D N�- V' 1 \ �, \ ➢iE ORES T 10 S,%` ` / ' �� /14,9 ( ATION 10. , .. ..• 16 • / ! / �,F,`/„/!/";�,r'i FEM A-2 Z ^\ /Jr! J.• ✓!Ji!//r l�JJiiJ/�iii!' ♦ 00, lolz % ! JJJJ..: li/',IR� �� \ © ,'�11 ~� /• !/ 1f °If r iJ�iiii { ��`/ Q ♦, 1 t / i Ii / //i// f//ail!JJJ/ice/ � i . •t �:.• ♦ �/ ..• ,�� #.1/ �JJJ �///i/�//�';iii � � \ • 'A//// ,( ////� / 200 Fool RPA3WRONT AREA ..,� \ ! ••• •••/ ••••I• \ 14 /I/// / // /lJj�% 01CAS 1NFD FROM 7F£FOREST RIVER SEAWALL) 9/i OIUI.65711 me-am BENCHMARK ♦ , //////,,:�iJJJ/!Ji MONEL RIVET / r i�' /11/rrr iiiliJ s''J�'r / / 0 60 IN LEDGE r , / /r/ ,y-•y,�r / �' ELEVATION = a lJlr ///,l t/,V/ 22.09 (NGVD 1929) // w�Hti E .y .c i� hr t �1l�IJ�,J�/J �J / 1 f / N ! !/ UNE \Gs t/ _..1••• /rt/ttllrll/lrillrilr IF 100-FOOT BUFFER TO r \ ,•` - r /j%J�li/iJ/��J�jJ�r�i�l LAND SUBJECT TO COASTAL STORM FLOWAGE FOR THE FOREST RLVFJ2 (MEASURED 100 FEET FROM ELEVAIM 10.0) o JJJJ SiHRY�0.71 JJJJJlrJJ/J//11J+'J/!/%/J / /JJ j JJ / J!�_ J /IN 1n+ tn)r// J/J //! r I o-CAR GARAGE FFE-=1 PAVED - -. DRIVEWA •� t/ )//! ! SIM tua6xaet l/rr rrJl�! / frllttttitfl DENOTES STONE BOUND TO BE SET BY OWNER UNLESS OTHERI�ISE NOTED. 0' 20' 40' 80' 120' mmmmw PREL/M/NARY PLAN tP OF TE Mass ROAD A PETER J 9�'yn SALEM, MASS. x NOTES: � OGREry Gv+ ZONE- R-1 C271 c, 9 No.27145 O = OWNER ENG/NEER In 1.) TOPOGRAPHIC DATUM IS N.G.V.D. TO OBTAIN SALEM CITY 'O9 �cis7ti � �� CLOVER ESTATES LLC HAYED' ENG/NEER/NO, INC 1h DATUM ADD 4.36. - ASSESSORS MAP 31 LOT 237 603 SALEM STREET' �; M/N/l1rlUM SET�4CKS.' S1DNAl��' c' FRONr = 15' • WAKMELD, MASS. 01880 S/DE 10' 3� °j a� SCALE.• 1" = 40' DATE FEBRUARY 28, 2005 ,�., NOTE: EXEMPT FROM RIVERS PROTECTION ACT BY: RIVERS PROTECTION ACT SECTION 18 EXEMPTING "LAND NOW OR REAR = 30' a, FORMERLY ASSOCIATED WITH HISTORIC MILL COMPLEXES". - /t!/V FRONTAGE = 100' SALEM PLANN/NG BOARD APDL/GAT/ON FILED ____________ 3 MIN. LOT ARF = 15,000 S.F. N 310 CMR 10.58(6)(1) IF A NEW OR REVISED CHAPTER 91 LICENSE IS OBTAINED. LOT COVERAGE =30% (MAX.) -------------------- FINAL PLAN FILED__ NOTE: PLAN INFORMATION FROM "SITE PLAN OF LAND GRADING do ---------------------- HF9R/NG DATE V; DRAINAGE PLAN, GLOVER ESTATES 485 LAFAYETTE STREET ROUTE 114 ___________,,,___ MARBLEHEAD, MASSACHUSETTS- BY PATROWICZ LAND DEVELOPMENT ---------------------- PLAN APPRO!/ED____------ ' � ENGINEERING SCALE 1"=20, DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 SHEET 2 OF 2 ----' w rr rn ---------------------- RAN SIGNED ---------------- a - { 1 - LAF 1 AYETTE STREET• LAND SUBJECT TO COASTAL _IndI )FOR � HAS (ROUTE 114) PROFILE DESIGN PROPOSED ~ _ FROM' PROPOSED FEMA v-4 zONE{MARBIF}fEAD) � GRADING PLAN A - - ------------- -- f .' .. ..•.._..—._._._ EXISTING -•— •—•—, _ MC I w THE "MUD FLATS" /�� _ _ � ' •�'�• • • :o.: - :`..�: t �SEE DETAIL 9�, - w' 1 FROM I[HIr' TO i PAVEMENT f a w ( *►) '�"- ----- -- �: '� ..•t - »' •'� 0+00 CB'S R=12.51 S ALEN� HARBOR I ►-a ` -,- - % x •'; s.'.:��., �, v RIM 21.02 R=11 6t 12' 1=9.0 ---' A �:......:. .: ........ ........................................................... ..... R=12.31 �LT.� RT - .......�• :461 ' _.�....� `~ Miv-15s2 U1 .. 12 1=9.1 • 1 - '•i•, •I• Arm'y��- fit A11r �•. `�� I ' LOCUS '' •' OF l[ARBLEO .•. •— _ i ce 1 / GLOVER ESTATES LLC _ ';.,mac:_" �'OIIN �:Y RAI 2T pg1fA1•LY 55. �T . 1 ASSESSOR'S IAP 55 LOT f .� ' F OR'S g0•. - �" LC.C. D240325 �.��•� .�. �,0 , : '`~, ASS�R 5537.dAP �'2,. TOWN OF MARBLEHEAD .sem 1 AlGa <, ',::• K R�•B 87. PL:'�` CETCHELL PLAYCROUND lsl LAND SUBJECT TO COASTAL �►'I!' �'� ,�� .,' :pL,B '8 "°°`D ASSESSOR'S MAP 57. LOT 10 STORM FLOWAGE FOR SALEM HARBOR ODo eflp (ELEVATION 14.0) �►�� .`. •� '�: •• g5, 4•. - j oQ FEMA 1-3 ZONE (SALEM) / 1 /�� 0. __ A, ./ -1^.y. •N77,56IOp"E I MANIOLE �� y�� ', 'rfJC��Q•ji\�jp\ a o U°.� ' Al-' • ;;;; ci ' �! :�..�a:-'., " r_• �>, ,q �o , fi BANK ",v. ,� i -I•-4.0% .100' V.C. ''. ::<. °' r - ' ' ' ' . • -• ( OF RIP iitj'•� �'� �_ •;�� •.'s•,s •.�:. • ..•• ,• �) TOP •� � •1 � • —M.In,•r1ir�•1NlfM.. :p• „ ..+.• ..f..••r•• �6J �O• nn .�O 'r \ Y/ W O O O O O •-I V�! :.r+q•� •U O h N t00 Gto ip _o TOAX pF' y= 0PN/ ? N M M N N Kj L6 to «) (D (6 co Pz f'OR�V MA� '�� LBHBdD ' , t e�PA/ LOCUS d _ •- .- ToIrMCLOVER ESTATES LLC BASE 0.0 f& ''�•LY Bid S AD F0RJ1 L MA& '� �000�F % OLD 0+00 . 0+50 1 0 1+50 2+00 _'&Z 553 :, FSSESSO S -RdILROAD 23* , too-FODT BUFFER To t ASSESSORS MAP 55, LOT 3 FOUNDATION WALLS 4 31, IAT2+201 �B$ 5532'. � 233 .. �o_ASSESSOR'S YAP 3f O PL so Ly ,6`t LAND 9J JECT TO COASTAL (� LC.C. D240325 C.P. 1+65 . �`I;.BK 287 yz60 � .p��ga��pL�z FLIMEASURED OWAGE � ` ' R=967.67 � � FROM ELEVATION Lao) / �M. M W L=174.6 / RAM-31.77 ASSESSORSw 'S ' rn =252.23 �. N v, , ••••• I �' OLD IM wus M1�15 03 / LOT 2 `- MAP 3f. ��! ^ � °° LOT 1 GAP N� LOT 235 / /'�s .,�� "' •��` ' NW •'� i ' 1239700± S.F. \ �06�� _' " Z 33,100E S.F. �-- i � d RIM-29.38 ---� / _---: 100' BUFFER FROM LS.C.S.F. MV-1395 � •� �o e C OFI O 1 r I (MARBLEHEAD CON:COM.) Ir . -- Unum EASE90 ITV SALEM o 4 to ASSESSOR'S MAP 31, LOT 236 �v`? q ® �/�- �- �- •ate ted,• LAND T4UNC:.PARCEL .40� 1 • ,'- F REC BK 17472, PC. 589 a LOCUS q $W CLOVER ESTATES'LLC 1 s 00 q4 AS'SESSOR'S.YAP. St..LO?' 23 41 RA!-14.86 ��' 'j0.06 $�D . L.C.C. D240325 4 0"� I N1v-10.71,/ 57.50 . . . 10,1 E S�G�� 1.3g'50'E N79• r r S�4"-S f,E � En 2+20.42 O :_� ' 6225 N _-- -- lop � 6s'3 • N75 4f ARTI4UR AVE. ?s 7 n�oo 232 ROBERT.AND MERNA. K9LIS \ i +00 SSOO F c ' 84 ROBERT ROAD ASSESSOR S MAP 55, Hydro C rn Q % A PORTION OF LOT f7 F a I& �/ i9 / ASSESSOR'S MAP 55, LOT 10 J=BE 15585, PG• 37 REC.BK 7769, PC .281 PLAN ,344 OF 1947 STC •900 PT@CBS COIICTBte St02'lIl ceptor* 10 PLBK 62, PL 36 2 � L=157.88 STORMCEPTOR COVER �`./ AND GRATE �s " GRADE ADJUSTERS TO o � .4, -�� vc / ,;J� y�o��' � �" F+�" SUR FlNISHED GRADE 5" SEE NOTE 11 6*0 OIL 6•C.AY �5 . CLFJWOUi �p 011 ' I �GJ s" \ Q STORM FtowACE FOR I / �cr / 7 •� •s\ � "` SUJMBXCT COAST 10 tai Q`' I N a N J THE FOREST RIVER ti ,� / 41' V •, ,t� ARTHUR AVE. ?` FELMAAA-2 zoNE N /.' �J -L D&g REALTY TRUST ASSESSOR'S MAP 55, LOT 17 STORMCEPTOR• E \ J BK 15585, PG 37 INSERT . �" DAVID BALIOTIS. TRUSTEE ?" Uk 80 ROBERT ROAD ® PLAN 344 OF-1947 °�c\ R=35.00 .' a ASSESSORS MAP 55, IAT 9A �` INLET WEIR OUTLET 18 16 PROPOSED '?.O L=53.08 % �� REIG.BK 11748, PG 3218 �/ s'i .. .. . =% P 1.E W/ SPREADER 5r \0 / L 9 of 1971 ��y�, �� A STONE SWALE O 'A _ !l ' OPLATE RIFICE RUBBER GASKET �=� •�"R=210 00 / � • PER ASTM C 413 \L=29.57 gyp, S• / PRISCILLA L DOLIBER , � ' 38 ARTHUR AVE. , 25.00\ �!..A••''•• �-. IOP ; \ RIM-13.77 ASSESSOR'S MAP 55. LOT f6 INLET PIPE 24.E DROr OUTLET CONNECTION DETAIL O L= .74 o`� (QW"�THE r�w� M�,S REIC BK 23557, PC. 329 OUTLET PIPE a ` 4'TO 6' L��g�� •� i / ,� �� 8.. OVERLAP $ �/ � any �•' '• � N� �. \ ",t�''� .. ••• L FREDRTCB Jr. Jr. & PAULINE R END � �� .�' / '� d'' L; •r s.. 4y• j'' BARNEY LINE v _ x 1474 LAFAYETTE ST \G�} �'� • .,, PAUL CHRISTINA REL'ILBACH SECTION THRU CHAMBER ASSESSOR'S MAP 31, LOT 24 ` "�E` i 4� dh MICHAEL AND STELLA HALIOTIS�O ASS35 ESSOR S MAP 55, LOT 18 RUR AVE. RECBK 6437, PIC 758 ,. - o " 76 ROBERT ROAD RECBK 16270. PG 435 100-x*8MM TO 0-971 _�. - + ? / ASSESSOR'S MAP 55, LOT 9 NOTE ENLARGED INLET AT THE INLET AND OUTLET WHERE APPLICABLE. TEE DROP PIPE wo SUBJECT TO COASTAL ^� 0-66t � RW.BK 10082, PC. 56f I. THt USE OF FL.DmLE CONNECTWNS is RECOMMENDED scowr A.owACE FOR n+E FaaesT arv(n �' PL 8 OF 1971 (ms�D goo FrEr FRw arvAnm io.o) h Orr luQ.ear 2. THE COVER SHOULD BE POSITIONED OVER THE OUTLET 2 DROP PIPE AND THE OIL CLEANOUT PIPE 3. THE STORMCIP'TOR SYSTEM IS PROTECTED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING U.S. PATENTS: 14985148, #5498331, SEWER STATION / 15725760, #5753115, 15849181. SMH RIM-14.58 ♦ UAV-8.96(l�) / / 61 v PAVED ♦ C �rsrsare DENOTES STONE BOUND TO BE SET BY OWNER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. / ETT 74 HARD NBERT RO� '� 40'LAYOUT ► O' 20' 40' 80' 120' K I ASSESSORS MAP 55, LOT 8 LOGITS RECBK 14616, PC 187 PLBE 321, PL 2 CLOVER ESTATES LLC • ' ASSESSOR'S MAP 55, LOT 1 CHRISTOPHER R & JEA4M" 3 3 12 12 3 5 LC.C. D240325 PRE"L/til/NARY PLAN & PROFILE HALEY SIDEWALK GRASS- SIDEWALK �" °f ROAD A f 156 LAFAYETTE ST PLOT ASSESSOR'S MAP 37, 1LOT 6 - ��L' qss RECBK 19482. IL. 472:' 1'TYPE/BIT. CONC, ,TOP LAYOUT c4 TR4lELED WAY o PETER J qc�G. s a NOTES: 2'CLA.SSS/BIT. CONM MADER ( ��,� g OGRE N � f SALEM, MASS. I GR4NITE* W.21]5 CIML ZONE.• R-1 � ``- • 1.) TOPOGRAPHIC DATUM IS N.G.V.D. TO OBTAIN SALEM CITY ( 1�2 6`REVE4L 9F �a OWNER ENGINEER Q'sTE�' GLOVER £STATES LLC HAYS ENGINEER/NG, INC. N DATUM ADD 4,36. 1/4+/Ff 1/4�/fT (1YP) MIN/MUM SZ - AL., ASSESSORS MAP 31 LOT 237 603 SALEM STREET tli FRONT = 15 WAKEFIELD, MASS: 01880 NOTE: EXEMPT FROM RIVERS PROTECTION ACT BY: 12'6RA�BORROW M 4"PG9NTABL£So/L S/DE = 10 `3 ('30 o r SCE..• 1" = 40' DATE FEBRUARY 28, 2005 RIVERS PROTECTION ACT SECTION 18 EXEMPTING "LAND NOW OR C41V, A7REALARMI I 1 1/2'TYPE/B?. CONC. TOP WI7�`1 SEZrD(7m) REAR = 30' 3 FORMERLY ASSOCIATED WITH HISTORIC MILL COMPLEXES". EPEC &>FLE: 0 8'ORA VEL ONE COURSE • MIN. FRONTAGE = 100 2 Min. Cover BORROW(IYP) I � SALEM PLANNING BOARD APPLICATION FILED w 310 CMR 10.58(6)(1) IF A NEW OR REVISED CHAPTER 91 2 1/2 CLASS/B/T. CONC. BINDER A&V LOT AREA = 15000 S.F. UCENSE IS -OBTAINED. BENCHMAAW I ONE COURSE LOT COVERAGE =30% (MAX.) MONEL RIVET ---------------------- NAL PLAN RLL-9............. NOTE: PLAN INFORMATION FROM 'SITE PLAN OF LAND GRADING do IN LEDGE DRAINAGE PLAN, GLOVER- ESTATES 485 IAFAYETTE-STREET ROUTE 1 i 4 ELEVATION = TYP/CAL CROSS SECT/ON MARBLEHEAD, MASSACHUSETTS" BY PATROVVICZ LAND'DEVELOPMENT 22.09 (NGVD 1929) -------- HEAR/NG DATE______ SHEET OF 2 ------------ -- - Lu PLAN APPROWD w ENGINEERING SCALE 1`_-20, DATED SEPTEMBER -25' 2001 NOT TO SCALE C% T ---------------------- 00 PLAN S/GNED---------------- i �.^++aas�w.w.••se.-:,...,c+.alr:<.�. ., .,,r�r,-.-,asr. .�wae•.a.,t�cn*�,.. aar•..•...�• +�.r..-.,.na* _ .xo.,-,._ ,�•<.-.. ,+� ,.a..; .n. ..c. -t. s �: ._.._..,.. .�-'-��-- ..�_-_-�'— - _,.-..._-�-----�.. .._..--- ----- - -- ' 1 ' i f I LAND SMW TO COASTAL I STORM FLOWAGE FOR SALEM HARBOR i (ELEVATION 14.0) � - — / �-.-•_"~~ ' FEMA V-4 20NE ARBLEIEAD �a 4" r _ - SMH ' - - � a : / ,' - " /„•`Jr�r _^��i��t`� �� I/I�rs _ .-_.rXr� �•■_r.�•e...•-^:•5:-:•.i�•:-is _-... -- - '_•• r- ,.••-''„ ..- -/fid..r�tw`~-r/^�/j,',,,i i/r/i'^i�� ;'��i••I ...e,"' i•r„.0y tom:-='- -1J�fl_ - -•� '••- �a.�ff••�I•V•_•'•�.. - �.5•ti/^l.i~...�•rr r/i..• -'�'—t�/N,...N_N_I_.f1•„1r/\1= •�••••••••••1••••• R��2t.� -_-__ _--.- / MV-1&9y2 SALEM HARBOR • z - 000 _ r� / / �• _ - ol so •lo ` p 01 �' Ili/ // // r/ /r/r / ��% / •vr/ 'b` �. .p j�.. - •• •••••••••••••?�.•r• / \ •• \ - _/ LAND Si1B,ECT TO COASTAL '� ' i /r�- �.-r� /''r / +./ � // STORM FLOWAGE FOR SALEM HARBOR 10 (El"AT10N 14.0) r - / ',' - _ i 'i/"-,r / •��-_// 1 \v / \ ••••••y \ + FEMA V-3 ZONE /' / ,' -r' .../.h• ?. r/ t ,, ••••••�� // '- jQ asp v (SMM - . op / / -`••- /-' aw ��i' / / ::•.r>.- � � ••�^ t♦ � •••i•K_ r- ` / /// r..r +..ate-\`_ �'- 21 t� - ��_ _ _ � � - �` � /' /./-�/' / �..•." r / y � �I rr/�!�t••/.i/I� .. •e C :••• / ..' r •••• ✓�. _+- �-i r rrr/• f ,^ � \ �,,.-_•+ _�.0 }R• r Q / // �_rrr / ...;•:lYa r/r •-r •ate r / • � / / �' r r :� / _,_.r � \ ♦ ` _ J • _ _ ' r"r/ •� ••�• rrr/ �• ...r/. /i -, / ii_ -�! 1-- - / /r /r \ /.�~y \.\;1p - 'a 1 / 'S. +a �•��i• �. + r „- - - ='_ ��i _VOFk'-M'R1P -i .•/ rJ'•r� \ �Q r r\ l •••• l / ^" 'r I��/ r r / + I ._ - _ / + � s ALL _ ! • . •.,•4 \ ` _ �'•wr .`•^ _ J \ •`` r r i r/ - / „, r r / , + .. - _ + ... ,�r. r:a• r _wlsy - _-_ _` �•• - 1 f /�� i - /ri---- -_ 20 - /� r ., _ + r ,�� /� vu ..♦ � L �-� �•. .. .. _ � -• 1 �'\ ••• \ \\ { •�+ ri/ w.f r _Y - r �,b ! • ' t r \ -- 131♦ •`� \_ \ t I r �^ ��..�_/ ,'r/�\ / / /. . T It 1 - r LOT �` \-I \ { \ / 1 , / ��^___- Xz -1-_I'f� .� -� / t �� :••�` / t \\...„./ ��`\+ \ \ \ \ r �"� -r_ r/ .�o �` �/,,. ••.// \\,,, ` _ mmmg •• _ '+ \ \ \ \ 1 0 + - FOUROATION-WALLS' _ + //i/ \//-_� //% /' / / 'r/ 1 „/- � � /�/- t / • r��'r - /2 \ \ ` \ \ �`, 1 / \ ,123,70 S.F.• • - \. 1 t 1 �\ ' / , / , / / 1 1// / / 1 "►100-FOOT TO \ \ r.- 30 ►/ r/ ~ ..' l ��r '� +�\ , �••, \ LAND SL9ECT TrD CO ♦ /i q �► / J/,// ! t \ J / -- 31 1 t}/ JJ /r / ! / / / " 1 1 ,I,/ �••• 1 C STORM F107FAG� FOR TIS yER `` �► / ,/ +\ _.. / \ t art / / / t /1 A 1 t 1 I \ (MEASURED 100 FEET F MIE EyIA 10.0) 1 e� e� ! 32 Ir 2 11 IN1/�1S.OS' t/ fit oo i/rrr / Of / ♦ / / 1 / J^' \ 1111 r 1' '.. 1•••• / { / / , 1 / / `J-/ / r b \ \ \ - ��%/� ,/r ,'' 11 1 {\ r// r� / , t H \ / / --' 1� 41 I , •_..._. t / / .- , , , t 1 { , , �1-29.3a \ , r - - - - • ••• + 100' PUFFER FROM L/§.C.S•R. ) l / / I I { J { \ `` ON 95 +�/ - ` _ --` r - moo/ - -_ - _- - �` .' /1111 i r 't { t ► i r i 1 1 , / r , 1 •.• (MARBLEHEAD CON.COM.) { ! J/ 1 l I { \\ \ -1 / /_ _r -� = .. -,SI=B- --- _ ♦♦♦ u . _ /i"/'! I 1 1 1 i t r 1 11 � ! , 1 y0. •••••• / �' t / , i //'/ t I ( f } { -� /' �' �• iXFJ�?T�" "r/'.• _ ..=� - -.�?SC��'.' - -- ._ �- •• Q' ! 1 1 / 0 ••� P. .r?4 - \ \\ , ., t ► I t r 1 tl�l f / b '"ter ' - _ - _—" =_� 1 \ 1 \\ / / • : / rte' r' �, r/// / i- :- - 1 •� � I / � ! / // ' ' � / �• iiltl- �•---„'--.�. ...- � �'► r LOT I 11 • • / `, � �' ` r- \\\\\ l 1 1 { ` { l I i�/ ' • ' ( Ft1M�14.tT4-� / • / !, //is ii�'��i a�.-�r 111•'1 *�. lw- �� 'C> / tan r / . . . . _ =-`L __,---//- / 'I 3.3100± S.F ►-, - _ - _ - � \ , ti { • t � ` / I►/ / ► � � f- r •/ r : � � � -: - - 1 • • ^r//i/ //�/i /i r i/ri///+��i fir/ ' � + 111 t 1 i 1 F I i � ♦ i 1 // / \\\\ � t t ' /� �✓ t I 1 N o o \\\\ , i �►`/ r / / ..� 17 •• 1. ,so so o so ly 'w royal 2 m{o ' ' 14 � • � \o JAY \ o- LMMFWWCT tb10 \' SIE R1VQt ♦ � � A170N 10. • ♦ �� • ��G � /,//y/,///� /�/'/i/.�i�/,� - ® . / / / / / / A-2 ,, � /IR j/� .' /////// ?, ,,4;�J!",iii Zoo so "Ill so le \ t •: Is• 1 \ • ///// /// OOT/% 200 FWAN74W AWA •re i y : \ r ••• •••i ••••1• ` /4 /I/// %; !!/j/% OCASA M FROM 7W FOIEST MOVER WAMN L) : fN I�i•t<i7t1 �� BENCHMARK ♦ I//, ..////�,//,/a. I MONEL RIVET i / a / /i/i .•r/ // IN LEDGE / ELEVATION 2209 (NGVD 1929) , END MMt1E c ♦ 4 I t11tr/�1 / UNE \y 1.• Fll ll/tllllr/ll ,1 / tt/ /ttll iNlllllrt/ / / •�,, �� /x / /11/l 111 1// 1j/ / / i/lr�jrfl��ll�l1////�I f00-rm BUFFER LAO SUM=TO COMAL S7nDWAM FOR 7K ME”RM _ W 0ril1 /'/%%/'l (WASURM 100 FLET FROM 8"A"10.0) /, ,/// oo !! 60 QM/10E "r-ml / ♦ rli ilir///�/ ///r , / PAVED ,: g - _ \ •, rttll t ,r////rrrr,r , DRIVEWA lllltlrt/r///irt f �r fill/ 1 ° I lrrrlrl f alrMRn.esae + \ / rtrir►/till/r f lil i j '�rr fill it 1_ -el- — DENOTES STONE BOUND TO BE SET BY OWNER NESS OTf/ERW/SE N NLOTED. O' 20' 40' '80* 120' PRELIMINARY PLAN ROAD A ' �P\VN OF Mgss 17o �� PETER J 9^y OG EN S � NOTES: � N ALEM, MASS. a CML + . ZONE: R-1 9 m 1.) TOPOGRAPHIC DATUM IS N.G.V.D. TO OBTAIN SALEM CITY �f I0ST14P�o Q . ,. OWNER ENGINEER 14 DATUM ADD 4.36. 9 G/ ti GLOVER ESTATES LLC HAYES ENG/NEER/NG, INC N MIN/MUM SETBACKS.• ALL ASSESSORS MAP 31 LOT 237 603 SALEM S7R= FRONT = 15' WAK£f7EZD, MASS• 01880 Ln 3 as SCALE.• 1' = 40' OA7E. FEBRUARY 28 2005 0 ,� NOTE: EXEMPT FROM RIVERS PROTECTION ACT BY o SIDE- _ 10 1 , M RIVERS PROTECTION ACT SECTION 18 EXEMPTING '%AND NOW OR REAR = 30' 3 FORMERLY ASSOCIATED WITH HISTORIC MILL COMPLEXES". MIN. FRONTAGE _ 100' SALEM PLANNING B04RO APPLIC4770N FILED ____________ 310 CMR 10.58(6)(1) IF A NEW OR REVISED CHAPTER 91 MIN. LOT AREA = 15 000 S.F. LICENSE IS OBTAINED. LOT COVERAGE =30% (MAX.) ---------------------- FINAL PLAN f7LE0........... -- NOTE: PLAN INFORMATION FROM "SITE PLAN OF LAND GRADING do uae' DRAINAGE PLAN. GLOVER ESTATES 485 LAFAYETTE STREET ROUTE 114 ' ---------------------- HEARING DAT£ ------- MARBLEHEAD, MASSACHUSETTS" BY PATROWICZ LAND DEVELOPMENT ---------------------- PLAN APPROWD----------- Lu -- � ENGINEERING SCALE 1`=20. DATED SEPTEMBER 25. 2001 SHEET � OF � o, ---------------- 00 a I mom mom II 1 LAFAYETTE STREET LAND SU& CT TO COASTAL (ELEVA7I14.0) - _ (ROUTE 114) PROFILE DESIGN PROPOSED � STORM FLOWAGE FOR SALEM HARBOROI I FEMA v-4 ZONE ( £HEAD) _ _ FROM PROPOSED GRADING PLAN •- •- - EXISTING (STORMCEPTOR-900) N ,--' -- I -+ I THE ,IUD FLATS" �~ •�•i :a -'•r :ah. PAVEMENT SEE DETAIL I w 1 W (FROM JfPl1I TO YL1I) ------'----'• ',�= ' '•Y - r s� 0+00 C8'S R-12.51 SALEM HARBOR a - -a--=-_-_. ._ _.- _ _ ,2 9.0--- wM-21.02 R=11�6t �I-T) 51 iiwv�t�Q2R=12.31 RT.) t - •�.�• 12' 1-9.1 ` LOCUS �IljWAD 2 --- / GLOVER ESTATES LLC /• ALLY 65. I,OT ASSESSORS YAP 55LOT 1 /•rFO \ LC.C. D24032b i -'tq� /'/•� 0, '.ti:: ASSESS055371 PG' 60.. . TOWN OF MARBLEHEAD \ _ Al J K IRW$�,�,�•pj; •72• r� GBITCBELL PLAYGROUND LAM SUBJECT TO COASTAL i� PbB 1 ASSESSOR'S YAP 57. LOT 10 �t - FOR I. g5 p4 I Q FEMA v-30Z ONE (SALEM) SA1D/ HARBOR All L - : x•56 CJOo mp (ELEVATION 14.0) / 1 ' --''�'{�7_/ • !', N' •QQ'E /tj 49 J2. Al 40 60. -'Y : �O OG .C, p j BANK 1 •..,, ,"- / � ` ` �. I 4i � F +4.0% 100' V.C. +1 .0%- 7 , . _ti•. :<' . :'�'4`+' -� ALL) (T� OF MP : -�' ZS �G"�6 �J '! �•a..�''' '-;�1� '4 ,.:..:r+�:• t� c�40• �OePN� / \ u� N tD O N N M O I- 04 c0 f\ 00 TOI OF YARB I 1 OJ P/ LOCUS a� - Ki rri �r ui ori - co cn c0 RM4 LY Y TOWN OF MARK 001 ooP CLOVER ESTATES LLC BASE-0.0 �.�aoAD F �RyAIZT. Y � , °° °� ASSESSOR'S YAP 55, LOT 3 'n' °� 0+00 0+50 1 0 1+50 2+00 \ AS'.SES'.�OR• ' ♦ 0 100-FOOT BUFIFER TO �� LC.C. D24O32b FOUNDATION WALLS. RF.L^B1 55,97 po 31. IAT 1O ASSESSORS IfAP 6 � 2+20t - PLB 60 233 .. Ba 5537. PG. 60 6'f L11l10 SUBJECT To COASTAL C.P. 1+65 PL 72 PLBI[ 287, PL 72 L= 'w"°F (MEASURED 100 FSTM EET / / R-967.67 =174.6 � ••• FROM ELEVATION 1ao) L i ,, =252.23 \�,OF N , : •• sM1 ASSESSOR S / ,' o P�d9•• '� I / � LOT 2 as rouo►uor wus _� � MMI� MAPLOT 1 LO ss / , � , .��' �� .•1 123,700E S.F. z 33,100E S.F. �� •' 1 �� ., . /'� RMI-29.38 / 'Pei h o •,° r m II j 10 ' BUFFER FROM S.C.S.F. wv�t� 1_-U�L1 o 0 CID (MARBLEHEAD CON.COM.) E/f " CIY OFISALM , ASSESSOR'S YAP 31, LOT 238 .LAND TAVNC: PARCEL 40 Y F, REC BS 6472, PG. 589 a Izii LOCUS GLOVER ESTATES LLC I 1 srH 00 q4 ASSESSOR'S YAP 31, LOT 23j '� RiM-u.ea / 70 06 ASID R I 4. W LC.C. D24OS25 4 -COo ti 1 wv-1 Sn/ 57.54 7 10'10"E iG � C ($- ' I N _ EN \ o �-O � •��► HT1'38'50 -� --- S- S LE IIiG 2+20.42 O �'s66• / N,7 41 ARTBUR AVE. "03 �3?, ; ' ROBERT AND YERNA KALIS\ ' '� Un N �'r? 2+00 S 00 F 84 ROBERT ROAD ASSESSORS YAP S5 ��/ ASSESSOR'S YAP 55. LOT f0 A PORTION OF LOT 17 Hydro Conduit \ / / REC BK 15585, PC. 37 STC 900 Precast Concrete Storm ceptor* ^ � , I / / REC. 7769, PG. 281 PLAN 344 OF 1947 / g PLBK 62. PL 38 \ z .<v L=157.88 \ / ; •.`1'/ / �' STORMCEPTOR COWER Ar AND 0 \ 's ' / •c�' / /� �'wu� GRADE ADJUSTERS TT `O •� �,� 1�' / ; .4jFO / aC" w�` SUR FWLSHED GRADE 5" SEE NOTE #1 6*0 OIL Vr �• our 1 r��jo s.. ` LAND SUBJECT TO COASTAL IDSTOW FLOWAGE FOR (b I •� / / FORES1 RrvM 1 / 41 ARrRU.R AVE. r. \ (EEVATWH MO) N �J y D&H REALTY TRUSTT ASST!-S YAP 66. LOT 17 V STORMCEPTOR• ' ' a�\ FELLA A-2 ZONE J i DAVID HALIOTIS,. TIRUSTEE RBC BK 15586, PG 37 INSERT 011 2" i 80 ROBERT ROAD ® PLAN 344 OF 1947 ti / ASSESSORS YAP 55. LOT 9A INLET WEIR OUTLET 18 16' PROPOSED \ R=35.00 r Ott l 'L=5308 REC BK 11748. PG. 328 /'� /C RUSH SPREADER ' O . % / PL 9 OF 1971 4Ny �� tib STONE SWAL E ��2`� �•y,, --\-k 210.00 PLATE GASKET L=29.57 1 / / / PRISCILLA L DOLIBER PER ASIM C 443 \ 38 ARTHi1R AVE. DROP TEE 25.00 t••/!'' •• SMH ASSESSOR'S YAP 55. LOT 18 _ O L= .74 . /O� �� RIM-13.77 2W F=wvERFnaKT AREA INLET PIPE OUTLET CONNECTION DETAIL \ �?�j p wv-9.e3 t�s�n FROM nE FUMST WAR sEJ NAW Oaa Nws�a RECBK 23557, PG. 329 , 2OU LET PIPE , • 4' TO V 1 \ `l�O� r( •. / �O 8.. OVERLAP FREDRICK J. Jr. A PAULINE R END t. E HAVEY uN R \S�j►A O d�' '�',� 8 LAFAYETTE ST :?� ' / #474 -- .. PAUL d: CHRISTINA Rh'ULBdCH SECTION THRU CHAJ�IBER ASSESSORS YAP 31, LOT 24 35 ARTHUR AVE. RECBIG 8437. PG. 768 MICHAEL AND STELLA HALIOPIS y ASSESSOR'S YAP 55. LOT 18 v O / 76 ROBERT ROAD RW.BK 16270. PG. 435 10D4-00T 9L FTM TO 10-97t ENLARGED INLET rt rt �k ASSESSOR'S YAP b5. LOT 9 NOTE TEE DROP PIPE LAM o SMECT COASTAL " � 0-661 R8IC BK 10082. PG. 561 1. THE USE OF FLEXIBLE CONNECTIONS IS RECOMMENDED s1aa�RDRAM FM RE FOREST W" UP / PL 9 OF 1971 AT THE HET AND OUTLET WHERE APPLICABLE. (MEASOMD 100 HELI FROM aEVATON 10.0) / v1 �w"71 2• THE COVER�T E ( ANp(8 OVER THE OUTLET DROP PSE 3. THE STORMCEPTOR SISTEM IS PROTECTED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING U.S. PATENTS: #4985148, /5498331, SEAR STATIOtI 725760, #5753115, #5849181. SM1 RIM-14.58 / wv-&Win) • • PAVED ' / Ah DRIVEYYA iJ o fw�r r DENOTES STONE BOUND TO BE SET BY OWNER UNLESS OTHERW/SE NOTED. 00/ ROAD ROB.D S. BENIVETT 74 ,� 40'LAYOUT o' 20 40' 80' 120' �. 74 ROBERT 1 I ASSESSOR'S YAP 55, IAT 8 LOCUS RW.BK 14618, PG. 187 GLOVER ESTATES LLC PLBK 321, PL 2 AssEssoR•s YAP 55. LOT 1 PREL/M/NARY PLAN & PROFILE R A JEANNINE 5' -3' f2' 12' 3' S' LC.C. D240325 HALEY Sl"ALK CRASS- SIDEWALK 156 LAFAYETTE ST PCOT tN OFASSMa ROAD A RECBK19482. PC. 7LOT 8 1 TYPE/BIT• CoAve TOP ��PETER.I SJ � R'S MAP LAYOUT ct TR4VFL£D AYAY a� 9�, NOTES: 2'CLASS/BIT GYGWC. B/NL1E7P WRTI�'AL o �v`N �� : SALEM MASS. 1.) TOPOGRAPHIC DATUM IS N.G.V.D. TO OBTAIN SALEM CITY I 112 I s ZONE.- R- 1 `' No.21145 `9 OWNER ENG/NEER Q/STE DATUM ADD 4.36. 1/4`/FT 114 0//7 (7YP) MINIMUM SETQACKS.' �� GLOVER ESTATES LLC HAYES ENG/NEER/NG, INC Ln ASSESSORS APAP 31 LOT 237 503 SS m STREET N NOTE: EXEMPT FROM RIVERS PROTECTION ACT BY: 12'GR4�EL BORROW' FRONT = 15' i � WAKEFIELD, AIA,SS. 01880 M 4"PLANTABLE SOIL SIDE' = 10' 3 (3010;• SG4LE 1" = 40' L�4T£ FEBRUARY 28, 2005 `^ RIVERS PROTECTION ACT SECTION 18 EXEMPTING 'LAND NOW OR 047Y, f7REA/ARM I 1 1/2'TYPEI&T. COWL: TOP ��(7W) REAR = 30' a' FORMERLY ASSOCIATED WITH HISTORIC MILL COMPLEXES'. EZE't� & 7FLE. O 8"GR41�'L OW£COURSE MIN. FRONTAGE = 100' 2'Min. Corr BORROW(rYP) I SALEM PLANNING 804RO APPL/C.ATAON FLED ------------ 310 ___________310 CMR 10.58(6)(i) IF A NEW OR REVISED CHAPTER 91 2 112'CLASSAB/T. COMC. BANDER MIN. LOT AREA = .15,000 S.F. LICENSE IS OBTAINED. BENICHIMARK I C7YVECOURSE MOrNEI RIVET LOT COVERAGE =30% (MAX.) ---------------------- FJNAL PLAN F/LED-------____-- a NOTE: PLAN INFORMATION FROM 'BETE PLAN OF LAND GRADING do IN LLEDGE _______________ DRAINAGE PLAN, GLOVER ESTATES 485 LAFAYETTE STREET ROUTE 114 ELEVATION _ TYPICAL CROSS SECTION ---------------------- HEAR/NG DATE MARBLEHEAD, MASSACHUSETTS' BY PATROWICZ LAND -DEVELOPMENT 22.(09 (NGVD 1929) ENGINEERING SCALE 1"=20, DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 NOT TO SCALE w SHEET O ^L ---------------------- PLAN APPROtiED-------- a ------ Ch ---------------------- PLAN SIGNED Q ---------------- f GLOVER ESTATES LEAD MILLS r Glover Estates Assisted Living Facility yd / I \x ybu "aa C, a inks, pkm, z� 40Cou,1c,,i,,Z 0, 1<e4e. � ed4,7 ,ws d�r�rJeC�•� C MING ical Commission ET,SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 ." XT. 311 FAX (978)740-0404 , a TIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS .G.L. Chapter 40C) and the Salem Historical Commission of a Certificate of Appropriateness for: g ❑ Reconstruction ❑ Alteration ng ❑ Sign ❑ Other al Building Construction Date, if known: Cto of 5ttlem, 'Massar4use##s $ S 7 �;o � �lxtuting �nttr� (I@xte �xlem green REQUEST FOR REVIEW COMMENTS PRELIMINARY EFINITIVE SUBDIVISION PLANS DATE: 2e74),S' TO: BUILDING INSPECTOR O CONSERVATION COMMISSION ( ) CITY ENGINEER ( ) OUM �F;A4E—TQ QjT1t3 01 BOARD OF HEALTH Attached please find the application referenced below. The Planning Board requests that you review this application relative to the City of Salem Subdivision Regulations and MGL Chapter 41. We would appreciate your completing the form below and returning it to us. PRELIMINARY PLAN ( ) DEFINIITIVE PLAN APPLICANT: �L,Ovez C-,g7WT*-% L-t c PROJECT NAME & ADDRESS: S`l.�I�AM�XTYL StT- CONTACT PERSONS AND PHONE: Applicant: CITY: COMMENTS DUE BY: O Concur with proposal (Explain on reverse side) ( ) Need more information (Explain on reverse side) ( ) Cannot concur with proposal (Explain on reverse side) ( Comments included /,V- REVIEWER'S SI NATURE TITLE n DA *WHWBPIANAPP of �*nkm, 'Massar4usr##s 4 `�;T � �lantring '�uur� 0 mne ,�$a1em Green REQUEST FOR REVIEW COMMENTS PRELIMINARY EFINITIVE SUBDIVISION PLANS DATE: Af le 11' 13 'LcnS TO: ( ) BUILDING INSPECTOR ( ) CONSERVATION COMMISSION ( ) CITY ENGINEER i=.4*--?R E%j4e Zte13 ( ) BOARD OF HEALTH Attached please find the application referenced below. The Planning Board requests that you review this application relative to the City of Salem Subdivision Regulations and MGL Chapter 41. We would appreciate your completing the form below and returning it to us. X PRELIMINARY PLAN O DEFINITIVE PLAN APPLICANT: 6,Lova f- L-(,(- PROJECT -1.(-PROJECT NAME & ADDRESS: ": NS`LoWAYEIT-iL' St -vT CONTACT PERSONS AND PHONE: Applicant: CITY: COMMENTS DUE BY: ( ) Concur with proposal (Explain on reverse side) ( ) Need more information (Explain on reverse side) ( ) Cannot concur with proposal (Explain on reverse side) O Comments included REVIEWER'S SIGNATURE TITLE DATE jmMMSUBPUN.APP HP Officejet 7810 Log for Personal Printer/Fax/Copier/Scanner DPCD 9787400404 May 19 2005 2:23PM Last Transaction Date Time Type Identification Duration Pages Result May 19 2:22PM Fax Sent 917813778151 0:24 1 OK KEEGAN , WERLIN & PABIAN , LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 21 CUSTOM HOUSE STREET BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02 11 0-3525 TELECORIERS: (617)951- 1354 (6 1 7)95 1-1 400 (6 1 7)95 1-0586 January 25, 2002 Ms. Denise Sullivan Assistant City Planner Department of Planning and Community Development 120 Washington Street, Yd Floor Salem, MA 01970 Re: Lead Mill Dear Denise: Enclosed is the Scope of Work from Woodard & Curran on the Lead Mill site investigation. Also enclosed is their budget for this additional assessment. Please let me know if you need any assistance with the Brownfields grant application or any other details. Thank you. Sincerely, Barry P. Fogel BPF/pf Enclosure Cis:• ,1_1�.'- -� tCORPORATE OFFICES:Maine,Massachusetts, OODARD&CURRAN New Hampshire,Connecticut,Illinois,Florida Engineering - Science = Operations r- _, .Operational offices throughout the U.S. --I 1 March 22, 2002 Keegan, Werlin, and Pabian, LLP Attn: Barry Fogel .21 Custom House Street Suite 401 Boston,Massachusetts 02110-3525 RE: 2002 Soil Sampling Results—City of Salem Former Chadwick Lead Mill Site Salem/Marblehead, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Fogel: Attached please find the results of the soil sampling activities conducted within the City of Salem. This sampling was conducted in accordance with the Supplemental Phase Il Scope of Work for the Former Chadwick Lead Mill Site located in Salem/Marblehead, Massachusetts. For your convenience the results have been summarized in the attached table and the locations of each sampling point are provided in Figure 1. Please feel free to contact me at (978) 557-8150 if you have any questions or require additional information. Sincerely, /WHOOOODARD & CURRRAN INC. Michael L. Battistelli Project Scientist cc: Mark W. Roberts, McRoberts &Roberts, L.L.P. FILE 35 New England Business Center, Suite 180 1 Andover,Massachusetts 01810 �, 978-557-8150 1 866-702-6371 1 978-557-7948(Fax) i www.woodardcurran.com �i Table 1 Concentrations of Lead Detected in Soil 2002 Sampling Locations Situated in City of Salem Former Chadwick Lead Mill Site Salem/Marblehead, Massachusetts Sample Location Sample Depth Total Lead Identifier Date (ft bgs) (mg/kg) WP08 / 1/29/02 0-4 330 1/29/02 4-8 16 SB34 1/29/02 0-2 15 1/29/02 4-8 12 SS-44( 1/31/02 0-0.5 440! SS-45; 1/31/02 0-0.5 880/ SS-46 1/31/02 0-0.5 270 SS-47 1/31/02 0-0.5 160 BS-11 2/26/02 0-0.5 92 BS-12 2/26/02 0-0.5 100 BS-13 2/26/02 0-0.5 250 MCP Direct Contact Exposure Standard(S-I)j 300 Notes: ft bgs— feet below ground surface. mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram. Shading indicates concentration detected MCP standard. I \\DEDHAM\Projects\205777 Chadwick Lead Mill\Phase 11\2002 Salem—Marblehead data.xls Page 1 of 1 �Q= ��py\" � y 1. 5 �'9 ;_._y 1✓'"Na �. � � I I I M.�Y �.�_ ��' � �,''Ay: a SAi$Y, AAi�OR?�- � �a ,,. � Y` .v �! � D� z �•` _ t •� 4 t a e e omoo o t I —______� -- — j n � k �� I3�-- i r1r1l \ s� be f F secm ro�ra `k rc s- c 0 36 70 t J � SCNE 91 FEET Figure 1 2002 Soil Sampling Locations a o SB-30$ �.eww w o mom rn Former Chadwick Lead Mill Site Salem/Marblehead, Massachusetts wooDAm&cum f:ngncer(ng Sc:a�cs pa:at:ory MAY. -22' 02MEDI 12:51 WOODARD & CURRAN TEL:781 251 0841 P. 001 y WCOCIAMISL t CORPORATEO FICIM:mab,a.manaa+usaaa Ertyineering • Science•Operations nv t 07iom tura, May 22, 2002 Salem Conservation Commission p �°S za .�' v°o�� 2 City of Salem Portal°Fax Note 767t One Salem Greeff To tame Salem, MA 01970 Com- co. Ph"4 tMrotro A Re: Salta Parcel of Fornter Chat - F. Results rw e ^ � � MA RTN[3-12695 Dear Members of tiro Conservation Commission: 77his letter is to supplement my previous letter to the Salem Cunservadon Commission dated April 26,2002 in which i recommended that a fence be constructed along Lafayette Street and the Marblehead bike path adjacent to the Parcel of tho fanner Chadwick Lead Mills owned by the Salem Conservation Commission. The results ofthc toil sampling activities c.,,hducted Ot land owned by the Conservation Commission the City of Salem indicated total lead levels up to 880 mg/kg(milligrams/kilogram)- This sampling wa;conducted in accordance with the Supplemental Phase 11 Scope of Work for the Former Chadwick Lead Mill Sire located in Salem/Mablebead, Massachusetts. The rcsulu indicate that lead concentrations in the soil on Tic Salem Conservation Commission parcel tested are above the applicable Massachusetts Contingency Plan(MCP) Direct Contact Standard of 300 parts per million. The Direct Contact Standard for lead is the same concentration as the MCP Mettuhd I cleanup standard,the concentration above which a condition of long-term significant risk is presumed. At The beginning ofthe investigation of the turmerChadwick Lead Mills Site,I contacted Paul Lucke of The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection's Boston Office and asked what concentrations of lead should be used as a public health protective standard in the near-term and prior to completion of a full risk characterization at the Site. Mr. Locke strongly recommended that the Direct Contact Standard was the most appropriate concentration to use until the site-specific risk characterization was completed,due to the proximity to the bike path and the frequency of use. In assessing the nature and extent of lead as the primary contaminant, 1 have sought to minimize public access to concentrations of lead above this standard. it should be emphasized that their concentrations of lead do not pose an Imminent Hazard, but that to be conservatively protective of public health, I have recontnu:nded That dim-tit contact with these soils be prevented to the extent possible. It is my opinion as a Licensed Site Professional that a fence should be erected along Lafayette Street and along the bike path as a prudent health risk management measure. 9W washingtan Street.Sure 325 s Dedham,Massachmens 02M a 781-251-0200 a 781-251.0847(Fax) 1-800-446.5518 a www.woodardeurran-com MAY. -22' 02(WED 1 12:51 WOODARD & CURRAN TEL:781 251 0841 P. 002 r R 1 i f Additional Phase: It sampling will need to be conducted prior to conducting a Method 3 (Site Specific) Risk Characterization,since the Salem parcel was the actual location of the former Lead Mill building. Additionally,this parcel is subject to tidal action that frequently has been found to redistribute conhiminants. Finally, based upon hisrnric research 1 have determined that this parcel contains fill material,and fill material on the oilier bank of the river has been fatnd to be waste materials from the white lead manufacturing. Until additional sampling is performed and a Method 3 (Site Speciftcjl Rist:Chamcteri-rrtion is performed,it cannot be determined if the exposure point concentration for this location poses No Significant Risk. T7terefore, in an abrtndance of caution,we are requesting that the Salem Constorvation Commission erect a fence with signs posted to prevent access to this:parcel during tha summer when use of the bike path and pedestrian use of I-afayore Street ane at then,highest. It is my recommendation that the fence be erected at the earliest possible time in order to conservatively protect public hcalth during the busy summer season. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at(761) 251-0200. Sincerely, Woodard & Curran Inc. nA m icen. Site Professional C.C. Joanne Scott. Salem Board of Health Mark Roberts, McRoberts& Roben.S 101 Merrimac Street, Boston, MA Barry Fogel, Keegan. Werlin& Pabian, I.LP 21 Custom House Sorer Suite 440 Roston, MA 02110-3525 Glover Estates, LLC Czlov,gmr Dawes L� Mt is j CORPORATE OFFICES:Maine,Massachusetts,WOODARD VOOAV New Hampshire,Connecticut,Illinois,Florida Engineering - Science - Operations Operational offices throughout the U.S. July 30, 2002 Ms. Denise Sullivan Salem Planning.Department City Hall Annex 120 Washington Street 4' Salem,MA 01970 — `w Q Re: Glover Estates Assisted Living Facility Citizens Advisory Committee r Dear Ms. Sullivan: You and Don Cefalo have been invited to participate on the Glover Estates Assisted Living Facility Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC). This CAC is being formed as part of the process to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) of the project. The EIR is part of the state environmental review that is underway in accordance with the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act (MEPA)procedures that have been adopted for this project. We will hold the first CAC meeting on Monday, August 12 at 11:00 AM at the Enterprise Center at Salem State College in Salem, MA. This first CAC meeting is intended to be a kick-off meeting to introduce everyone, plan the schedule and times of the subsequent meetings, describe the EIR process, update the project status to date, and answer everyone's questions about the project and upcoming major milestones. We anticipate the meeting will last about two hours, and a light lunch will be served. We are very excited about this opportunity to gain the insights and opinions of you and your fellow CAC members that will help to inform and guide us in this process. We very much appreciate your contributing your time and effort to make this CAC a meaningful source of feedback to us on the Glover Estates project. Please call meat (781) 251-0200 to confirm your attendance at the August 12th meeting or if you have any questions or need directions to the Enterprise Center. Very truly yours, WOODARD & CURRAN INC. Daniel Garson, AICP Senior Vice President 980 Washington Street, Suite 325 1 Dedham, Massachusetts 02026 1 781-251-0200 1 781-251-0847(Fax) 1-800-446-5518 1 www.woodardcurran.com WOODARD&CURRAN CORPORATE OFFICES:Maine,Massachusetts, * New Hampshire,Connecticut,Illinois,Florida Engineering - Science , Operations - . _ Operational offices throughout the U.S. May 22,2002 Attn.Don Cefalo Salem Conservation Commission 120 Washington Street Salem, MA 01970 Re: Salem Parcel of Former Chadwick Lead Mill Site Sample Results MA RTN 3-12695 Dear Members of the Conservation Commission: This letter is to supplement my previous letter to the Salem Conservation Commission dated April 26, 2002 in which I recommended that a fence be constructed along Lafayette Street and the Marblehead bike path adjacent to the Parcel of the former Chadwick Lead Mills owned by the Salem Conservation Commission. The results of the soil sampling activities conducted on land owned by the Conservation Commission the City of Salem indicated total lead levels up to 880 mg/kg(milligrams/kilogram). This sampling was conducted in accordance with the Supplemental Phase II Scope of Work for the Former Chadwick Lead Mill Site located in Salem/Marblehead, Massachusetts. The results indicate that lead concentrations in the soil on the Salem Conservation Commission parcel tested are above the applicable Massachusetts Contingency Plan(MCP) Direct Contact Standard of 300 parts per million. The Direct Contact Standard for lead is the same concentration as the MCP Method I cleanup standard, the concentration above which a condition of long-term significant risk is presumed. At the beginning of the investigation of the former Chadwick Lead Mills Site,I contacted Paul Locke of the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection's Boston Office and asked what concentrations of lead should be used as a public health protective standard in the near-term and prior to completion of a full risk characterization at the Site. Mr. Locke strongly recommended that the Direct Contact Standard was the most appropriate concentration to use until the site-specific risk characterization was completed, due to the proximity to the bike path and the frequency of use. In assessing the nature and extent of lead as the primary contaminant, I have sought to minimize public access to concentrations of lead above this standard. It should be emphasized that these concentrations of lead do not pose an Imminent Hazard, but that to be conservatively protective of public health, I have recommended that direct contact with these soils be prevented to the extent possible. It is my opinion as a Licensed Site Professional that a fence should be erected along Lafayette Street and along the bike path as a prudent health risk management measure. 980 Washington Street, Suite 325 It Dedham, Massachusetts 02026 It 781-251-0200 It 781-251-0847(Fax) 1-800-446-5518 It www.woodardcurran.com -.A 2 r Additional Phase II sampling will need to be conducted prior to conducting a Method 3 (Site Specific)Risk Characterization, since the Salem parcel was the actual location of the former Lead Mill building. Additionally,this parcel is subject to tidal action that frequently has been found to redistribute contaminants. Finally, based upon historic research I have determined that this parcel contains fill material, and fill material on the other bank of the river has been found to be waste materials from the white lead manufacturing. Until additional sampling is performed and a Method 3 (Site Specific)Risk Characterization is performed, it cannot be determined if the exposure point concentration for this location poses No Significant Risk. Therefore, in an abundance of caution,we are requesting that the Salem Conservation Commission erect a fence with signs posted to prevent access to this parcel during the summer when use of the bike path and pedestrian use of Lafayette Street are at there highest. It is my recommendation that the fence be erected at the earliest possible time in order to conservatively protect public health during the busy summer season. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at(781)251-0200. Sincerely, Woodard & Curran Inc. n A.kSite psG�� icenseProfessional Cc. Joanne Scott, Salem Board of Health Mark Roberts, McRoberts &Roberts, 101 Merrimac Street, Boston, MA Barry Fogel, Keegan, Werlin & Pabian, LLP 21 Custom House Street Suite 440 Boston, MA 02110-3525 Glover Estates, LLC Project Budget Spreadsheet CLM.xls t - Woodard&Curran Inc. Chadwick Lead Mills-485 Lafayette Street(Route 114)Salem,Massachusetts RTN 3-012695 Tier I Permit No.W022240 Licensed Site Professional:John Thompson,P.G. Item Unit/Description Rate Markup Extension Total IIS Salem Con-Com:Request for Determination LSP 8 hours $130.00 $ 1,040.00 Project Scientist 16 hours $90.00 $ 1,440.00 Scientist 18 hours $6500 $ 1,170.00 Drafting 8 hours $65.00 $ 520.00 Clerical Report Prep. 4 hours $45.00 $ 18000 Mileage 360 miles $0.35 $ 124.20 Field Equip.&Mtls 1 each $10000 $ 100.00 Filing Fee I each $55.00 1.1 $ 60.50 Publishing/mailing I each $150.00 1.1 $ 165.00 ESTINIATEDTOTAL: S 4,799.70 Soil Samoline LSP 6 hours $130.00 $ 78000 Project Scientist 8 hours $90.00 $ 72000 Scientist 20 hours $65.00 $ 1,300.00 Lab Analysis 12 each $20.00 1.1 $ 26400 Drilling I each $1,600.00 1.1 $ 1,760.00 Mileage 450 miles $0.35 $ 155.25 Field Equip.,Mtls.&Security I each $450.00 $ 450.00 ESTIMATEDTOTAL: S 5,429.25 Level SdC d t Flow Direction LSP 2 hours $13000 $ 260.00 Project Scientist 4 hours $9000 $ 360.00 Scientist 8 hours $65.00 $ 52000 Mileage 90 miles $0.35 $ 31.05 Field Equip.&Mtls 1 each $150.00 $ 150.00 ESTIMATED TOTAL: S 1,321.05 Water Samoline LSP 4 hours $13000 $ 520.00 Project Scientist 6 hours $90.00 $ 54000 Scientist 8 hours $65.00 $ 520.00 Vehicle Expense 90 miles $0.35 $ 3105 Sampling Materials I event $200.00 $ 200.00 Lab/Analytical 2 wells $2000 1.1 $ 44.00 ESTIMATED TOTAL: S 1,855.05 ESTIMATED PROJECT TOTAL: $13,405.05 Page I Glover Estates Assisted Living Facility CAC Membership List 1. Ms. Jody Howard 7. Mr. Biff Michaud 9 Barnegat Lane 37 Lee Street Marblehead, MA 01945 Marblehead. MA 01945 2. Ms. Denise Sullivan 8. Mr. Rob Gough Salem Planning Department Salem Sound Coastwatch City Hall Annex 201 Washington Street, Suite 9 120 Washington St. Salem, MA 01970 Salem, MA 01970 3. Mr. Don Cefalo 9. Mr. Fred Harney Salem Planning Department 474 Lafayette Street City Hall Annex Salem, MA 01970 120 Washington St. Salem, MA 01970 4. Ms. Patricia Roberts 10. Mr. Wayne Attridge Marblehead Council on Aging Marblehead Health Department 10 Humphrey St. 7 Widger Rd. Marblehead, MA 01945 Marblehead, MA 01945 5. Ms. Linda Ellworthy 11. Ms. Diane St. Laurent Salem Council on Aging 77 Beacon Street 5 Broad St. Marblehead, MA 01945 Salem, MA 01970 6. Mr. Doug Saal Marblehead Town Engineer 7 Widger Rd. Marblehead, MA 01945 c.:c : < m :=e ,e,:.. ��. . ,g;t� fe,-yM.y. . #a>-¢,�s r s i• aP 's^! .v r d�`K f »,F .�;�. ga'-F GLOVER ESTATES ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE The mission of the Glover Estates Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) is to serve as a forum expressing community interests and to review information and give commentary and input to the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the development of the Glover Estates Assisted Living Facility in Marblehead,MA. The CAC is being organized by the proponent of the project to serve as an important source of public comment that will help to guide the content and conclusions of the EIR. The specific mission of the CAC is 1. To offer its views, comments and opinions about the proposed project to the Proponent and the Consultant Team. 2. To attend periodic meetings with the Proponent and Consultant Team to review work products and provide comment and discussion of the EIR analysis and results. 3. To help the Consultant Team identify all relevant topics, issues, and concerns about the project by offering good ideas and constructive comments. 4. To help build a consensus of opinion that will make the Glover Estates Assisted Living Facility a good neighbor and welcome addition to the community. w.r-e+ A. GLOVER ESTATES DRAFT EIR(DEIR) TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND 1.1 Project Description and Location 1.2 Project Alternatives 1.3 Status of MCP Site Investigation and Remediation 2.0 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES 2.1 Chapter 91 License 2.2 Traffic and Parking 2.3 Historic and Archaeological Resources 2.4 Wetlands Resources 2.5 Benthos Resources 2.5 Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities 2.6 Site Drainage &Utilities 2.7 Hazardous Waste Investigation and Remediation 2.8 Construction Period 3.0 MEPA REVIEW &EIR SCOPE 4.0 FORMAT OF THE DRAFT EIR II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION & ALTERNATIVES 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1 Project Location and Existing Conditions 2.2 History of the Site 2.3 Need for the Proposed Project 2.4 Public Benefits Resulting from the Project 3.0 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN 3.1 Project Development Plan x 3.2 Site Remediation and Closure 3.3 Development Schedule" 3.4 Public Amenities and Access to Waterfront Page 1 C:6Ny DacamentsWROJECMChadntiCk LeadDRAFTTablDRAFTTableo/Contents Version2 d-28-02.doc GLOVER ESTATES DRAFT EIR TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) 4.0 PROJECT PERMITTING 4.1 Federal Permits 4.2> State Permits and Agency Actions 4.3 Local Permits and Approvals 5.0 PROJECT ALTERNATIVES 5.1 Preferred Plan 5.2 Single-Family Residential Use 5.3 High-Density Residential Use 5.4 Open Space and Recreation Use 5.5 "No Build"Alternative 6.0 STATUS OF SITE INVESTIGATION &REMEDIATION ACTIVITIES 6.1 MCP Process and Requirements 6.2 Summary of Site Investigation Results 6.3 Remediation Action Plan 6.4 PIP Process III. CHAPTER 91 LICENSE 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 MEDEP PERMIT APPLICATIONS 3.0 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS 4.0 PUBLIC PURPOSE DETERMINATION&PROGRAMMING [Include bldg. floor plans and description of public uses] 5.0 OPEN SPACE, SETBACKS &VIEWS 6.0 PEDESTRIAN&BICYCLE FACILITIES 7.0 WATERFRONT USE 8.0 PUBLIC AMENITIES & SITE FEATURES '... p . 4a xw, 9.0 FACILITIES MAINTENANCE PLAN Page 2 CAMy DommenalPROJECTSIChadwiek Lea&DRAFT TablDRAFT Table ofContenk Veraionl 6-28-02.doc GLOVER ESTATES DRAFT EIR TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) IV. TRAFFIC AND PARKING 0.0 MEPA FINDINGS 1.0 SUMMARY OF TRAFFIC STUDIES 2.0 MITIGATION MEASURES V. HISTORIC RESOURCES 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 HISTORIC &ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES IN THE AREA 3.0 HISTORIC &ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES ON SITE 4.0 IMPACTS TO HISTORIC & ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 5.0 POTENTIAL MITIGATION MEASURES VI. . WETLANDS FISHERIES & BENTHIC RESOURCES 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.1 Coastal Wetlands and Beach 2.2 Bordering Vegetated Wetlands 2.3 Shellfish and Fisheries 2.4 Benthic Communities 2.4 Wildlife Habitat 2.5 Flooding Zone 2.6 Summary of Biological Diversity 3.0 IMPACTS TO WETLANDS,FISHERIES &BENTHIC COMMUNITIES [Including bank stabilization] _ 44 4.0 PROPOSED DREDGING &DISPOSAL IMPACTS [Including USACOE Individual Permit] 5.0 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Page 3 CIMy Da menalPROJECMChadwick Lea&DRAFTTablDRAFT Table of Contents Version2 6-28-02.doc .. i GLOVER ESTATES DRAFT EIR TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) 6.0 MITIGATION MEASURES VIII. SITE DRAINAGE & UTILITIES 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.1 Contamination Constraints 2.2 Remediation-Driven Environmental Improvements 3.0 PROPOSED SITE DRAINAGE CONDITIONS 4.1 Drainage Alternatives Evaluated 4.2 Stormwater Management 3.3 NPDES Stormwater Discharge 4.0 WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICES 5.0 MITIGATION MEASURES 5.1 Pollution Prevention and BMP IX REMEDIATION & CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 PHASED REMEDIATION AND CONSTRUCTION PLAN&IMPACTS 3.0 MITIGATION MEASURES X. DRAFT SECTION 61 FINDINGS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3.0 STATE AGENCY JURISDICTION . + • •.rO_V3.1,�Xhapter,91 Licenseev 3.2 Historic Resources 4.3 Wetlands and Habitat 4.4 CZM Federal Consistency Review Page 4 C:U/y Do"mentaTROJECTSChadwick LeadiDRAFT TablDRAFT Table of Confenp Vernionl_6618-02.doc GLOVER ESTATES DRAFT EIR TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) 4.0 OVERVIEW OFTROJECT IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES 5.0 CONCLUSIONS XI. . PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROCESS 1.0 CAC Meetings 2.0 CAC Recommendations XII. DEIR DISTRIBUTION APPENDICES LIST OF TABLES LIST OF FIGURES w,#r.zs r--1 Ad„^:s Me y,' x FNy+` ."�i�4 v7i9k'�.' .'`e' �.'Y"* ;4'i' Page 5 C.-Wy DmmentilPROdECTYChadwick Lea&DRAFTTab/DRAFT Table Of Contents Venion3 638-OS.doc n GLOVER ESTATES ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE Next Meeting: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 11:00 AM until 1:00 PM Location: Enterprise Center (same as last meeting) Loring Avenue Salem, MA Please phone regrets only to Lee Payton, Woodard & Curran at (781) 251-0200. GLOVER ESTATES CAC Attached are the minutes of the last CAC meeting and a revised list of the CAC members. The next CAC meeting will be held on Tuesday, September 24, 2002 at 11:00 AM at the same location in the Enterprise Center, Loring Avenue, at Salem State College. Please RSVP regrets only to my Assistant, Lee Payton, at (781) 251-0200. Daniel Garson, AICP WOODARD & CURRAN INC. Glover Estates Assisted Living Facility CAC Membership List 1. Ms. Jody Howard 7. Jane Bright 9 Barnegat Lane Healthlink Marblehead,MA 01945 3 Bridge Street Marblehead. MA 01945 2. Ms. Denise Sullivan 8. Mr. Rob Gough Salem Planning Department Salem Sound Coastwatch City Hall Annex 201 Washington Street, Suite 9 120 Washington St. Salem,MA 01970 Salem, MA 01970 3. Mr. Don Cefalo 9. Mr. Fred Harney Salem Planning Department 474 Lafayette Street City Hall Annex Salem, MA 01970 120 Washington St. Salem, MA 01970 4. Ms. Patricia Roberts 10. Ms. Diane St. Laurent Marblehead Council on Aging 77 Beacon Street 10 Humphrey St. Marblehead, MA 01945 Marblehead,MA 01945 5. Ms. Linda Ellworthy Salem Council on Aging 5 Broad St. Salem, MA 01970 6. Mr. Doug Saal Marblehead Town Engineer 7 Widger Rd. Marblehead, MA 01945 Glover Estates Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC)Meeting August 12, 2002 Attendees: See attendance list (attached) Agenda: Welcome/Intro. -Dan Garson Organization of CAC-Dan Garson • CAC Mission Statement • EIR Handouts • Meeting schedule and times Project Presentations • EIR Process—Dan Garson • Contamination Overview—John Thompson • Site plan and Chapter 91 —Mark Roberts Q&A/Wrap-Up—CAC Members and Consultant Team Discussion: Agenda was presented and general discussion w/CAC members followed. Among the questions and comments were: 1. How does.the CAC process relate to the PIP process? These are two separate processes that are governed by the respective state regulations that apply. The PIP is under the state MCP regulations and focuses on the hazardous waste contamination issues and remediation design requirements for site cleanup. The CAC is part of the EIR process under MEPA regulations and focuses on the proposed site development as an assisted living facility. Woodard & Curran and McRoberts and Roberts, LLP are managing the conduct of the two processes on behalf of the project proponent, Glover Estates. The two activities are being coordinated,but they are not being combined. This CAC will not examine hazardous waste issues in any detail, other than to periodically review brief summaries of the status of the contamination work. 2. It was agreed that greater understanding of the site contamination risks and of the interconnection of the assisted living facility to the cleanup effort was needed by the Public and particularly among those who have opposed the project. It was noted that there is a strong likelihood that the state DEP could designate this site as a"superfund" cleanup site if there is no private developer who is willing to undertake the cleanup activities as part of redevelopment of the property, as is currently being proposed. -- If the site were designated as a state Superfund cleanup site,the cleanup costs would be borne by the responsible parties and could include the local municipalities, taxpayers and ratepayers. This could pose a significant financial burden on local residents and should be widely communicated to all residents and interested parties. The positive attributes of the proposed development project, including its site cleanup and reuse benefits of a needed assisted living facility, need to be highlighted to inform the public and public officials of the importance of site cleanup and of the detrimental impacts if this project is cancelled or does not obtain necessary regulatory approvals. -- Project impacts and necessary mitigation measures are also important to address and will be fully analyzed in the EIR that is underway. 3. Representatives of town Finance Committees should be invited to participate in the CAC process,based on the potential municipal financial liability that may result if the site is designated as a state superfund cleanup site. --These individuals will be identified and invited to participate in the CAC process at the next CAC meeting. 4. John Thompson of W&C presented a contamination overview of the site. John focused on the upland, shoreline and near-shore harbor sediment contamination levels and testing methods followed. He described the planned remediation technique using a phosphate solution mixed into the soil to stabilize and immobilize the lead combined with a cap added from the proposed building foundation,parking and clean soils. Parts of the concrete building pad and site asphalt paving will be integral to isolate the contamination soils. Sections of the sandy beach area will be removed and replaced; and the near-shore harbor sediment will be excavated and removed for disposal on the upland portions of the site. An added benefit of the wet chemical mixing process to remediate the soils is that it will minimize dust. 5. Mark Roberts presented an overview of the site building plan and state Chapter 91 elements of the site design, layout and use of the interior space and exterior areas. Mark described the site layout and the various shoreline and tideland setbacks and uses required under the DEP Chapter 91 regulations. He described the circulation and safety features of the design, as well as the site drainage elements. Public access and parking elements were also noted. 6. Rich Bane presented an overview of the project's design and schematic drawings of the building. 7. A roundtable discussion was held to list all of the comments of the CAC members about the project. A list of the comments made is attached. 8. The meeting was adjourned and the next meeting will be held in September. CAC Comments on the Project 1. Positive development outcome is a community benefit. 2. The pluses of site development heed to be disseminated to the broader community. 3. Health risk issues of present site are real and need to be disseminated to the broader community. 4. There is a need for the assisted living facility in both Salem and Marblehead. 5. More information is needed on what the proposed assisted living facility is and how it will operate. 6. "Superfund" status of site would be a terrible outcome, if the facility is not built and the broader community needs to know that if this project fails there is a real possibility that the site will be added to the National Priority List and the EPA will take control. 7. Site resource issues and NOI process under the town Conservation Commissions need to be expanded. 8. Traffic issues need to be examined in detail,particularly along Salem portion of roadway. 9. Non-Single Family use is contrary to local zoning. A change in use could result in greater impacts than expected. 10. Remediation of contaminated habitat areas is needed. 11. Residential abutters across Lafayette St. currently have access and turning difficulties due to heavy traffic volumes. What will be the impact of the added cars from the project site? 12. Efficacy of the cleanup needs to be explained. 13. "Green"building design and operating systems should be explored to enhance the project's positive attributes and appeal. 14. The pervasive lead contamination in surfrcial soils is not acceptable and the site cannot be left in its present highly contaminated state,particularly given the observed use of the contaminated site by children and teenagers. �- - - NIEL s61� � D W�hifN - 8( —aS�-D,2,06 � Dx.. '.�r.� - V%<:I � G SA\ '7 . �oSJEt I - - SAc- �pvr1�_CorwPccckl- `tz$.-.Z�El--7Qoo �l ►C�--wll.ctt �� Sc `t U H i2skt.� _- -S ?S-_7f`�—�/acs Ac x3fi GLOVER ESTATES ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE Please Note: The meeting scheduled for Tuesday, September 24, 2002 at 11:00 AM at the Enterprise Center is CANCELLED. Next Meeting: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 11:00 AM until 1:00 PM Location: Enterprise Center (same as last meeting) Loring Avenue Salem,MA Please phone regrets only to Lee Payton, Woodard & Curran at (781) 251-0200. Environmental Notification Form 25-1 �ccuaecur�e� Axee4, .�c ?e 900 JAGOVEa ORFT - April 29, 2002 Tel. (617)'626-1000 BOB DURAND Fax(617)626-1181 SECRETARY http://W .magnet.state.ma.us/envir CERTIFICATE OF THE SECRETARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL NOTIFICATION FORM PROJECT NAME : Glover Estates Assisted Living Facility PROJECT MUNICIPALITY : Lafayette Street - Marblehead & Salem PROJECT WATERSHED : North Coastal EOEA NUMBER : 12741 PROJECT PROPONENT : Glover Estates, LLC DATE NOTICED IN MONITOR : March 23, 2002 Pursuant to the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act (G. L. , c. 30., ss . 61-62H) and Section 11 . 06 of the MEPA regulations (303 CMR 11 . 00) , 1 hereby determine that- this project requires the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) . According to the Expanded Environmental Notification Form (ENF) , the proposed project consists of the construction of a 55-unit, 28, 000 square foot (sf) assisted living facility with 41 surface parking spaces . Access to the site will be provided via a driveway onto Lafayette Street . Pedestrian access will be provided through the project site and along the perimeter of the site to the Marblehead bike path, the Forest River, and Salem Harbor. The site is vacant of buildings, but was the location for the Chadwick Lead Mill . The project area is characterized as a contaminated site, which will be cleaned-up in accordance with the Massachusetts Contingency Plan (MCP) . The proponent will undertake a Phase II Comprehensive Site Assignment (CSA) and Risk Assessment to evaluate the potential risk of harm as a result of contaminants at the site. The project area contains a total of approximately -l"5-. 73 acres,'of 'whi'chItithe proponent owns 4 . 38 acres (the locus of the assisted living 'facility)° "tlie'"Towii of Marblehead owns 0 . 96 acres (walking/bike trail that - parallels the beach front) , and the City of Salem owns 0. 39 acres on the north bank of the Forest River. The proposed remediation will occur on both the private and public lands . l £; Primetl an Recycled stack 20%Post Consumer Waste EOEA #12741 ENF Certificate April 29, 2002 This project is subject to a mandatory EIR pursuant to Section 11 . 03 (3) (a) (5) because a Chapter 91 Waterways License is •required for, anew non-water dependent use occupying one or more acres of tidelands . The .project will require a Section 401 Water Quality Certificate from the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) . The project must comply with the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDE) General Permit for stormwater discharges from a construction site of over five acres. It will require review by the Massachusetts Historical Commission (MHC) . The project will need a Section 404 Permit from the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers . It may require Federal Consistency Review by the Massachusetts Coastal Zone Management (MCZM) Office. Orders of Conditions are required from the both the Marblehead (MCC) and Salem Conservation Commissions (SCC) . Because the proponent is seeking financial assistance from the Commonwealth in the form of a Brownfield Redevelopment Fund Loan from the Massachusetts Development office, MEPA jurisdiction extends to all aspects of the project that may have significant environmental impacts. Using the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Handbook land use code (LUC) 252 (Congregate Care Facility) , the project is estimated to generate about 104 new daily vehicle trips. The project will be connected to the existing municipal water and wastewater service. The proponent has estimated that the project will consume approximately 8, 250 gallons per day (gpd) of water and it will generate a similar amount of wastewater. SCOPE In accordance with Section 11 . 05 (7) of the MEPA regulations, the proponent has submitted an Expanded ENF with a request that I allow the proponent to fulfill its EIR obligations under MEPA with a Single EIR. The Expanded ENF contained considerable information, which has been helpful in defining the scope of the EIR. However, because the document did not meet the enhanced standards of Section 11 . 06 (8) of the MEPA regulations, I am requiring the usual two-step Draft and Final EIR process . ,,,As.. modified,.,by this scope, the EIR should conform to Section 11.`07 of�the tMEPA .regulations E.for .outline, and y 2 EDEA #12741 ENF Certificate April 29, 2002 content. The EIR should resolve the remaining issues outlined below, with a focus on the areas of Chapter 91, wetlands, and historic/archaeological impacts . It should address the comments listed at . the end of this Certificate to the extent that they are within this scope, and it should include a copy of this Certificate and all comment letters. Alternatives Analysis : In addition to the No-Build Alternative and the Preferred Alternative, the EIR should discuss alternative building configurations, as required by the Chapter 91 Program, that have been developed by the proponent and might result in fewer impacts . The EIR should identify any site access options . It should provide a comparative analysis that clearly shows the differences between the environmental impacts associated with each of the alternatives. Chapter 91 Licensing: The information submitted by the proponent indicates that about 1 . 58 acres of the project site are located on filled tidelands of the .Forest River and Salem Harbor. The comment letter from DEP dated April 19, 2002, indicates .that the proposed project would be considered a non-water dependent use. The EIR should define the extent and type of tidelands involved and should provide the information necessary for a complete filing under the Chapter 91 Licensing Program. This should include, at a minimum: an alternative analysis; public purpose determination; provisions for o_oen space, setbacks, and view facilitation; description o= flooding conditions, if any, and facilities to encourage waterfront use; and a maintenance plan. DEP' s comment letter. expands on these requirements . All nonwater-dependent use projects are required to provide appropriate amounts of open space for water-dependent activity and public access . The amount of open space must be equivalent to the footprint of all buildings on the project site that are being used for nonwater-dependent purposes . The EIR should identify the onsite open space + that-is -proposed-to4be, dedicated to a pedestrian walkway system. The EIR should verify ctual' square 'footages*andL4_**s**w- -- 3 EOEA #12741 ENF Certificate April 29,2002 perform detailed open space calculations, which reflect DEP' s comments . The EIR should discuss the aesthetics of the project, and should include a conceptual-level landscaping plan and building elevations from all sides. The EIR should also discuss any phasing ,or other effects on public access that might be entailed by the timing of on- site remediation work. The EIR should address DEP' s concerns, such as historical licensing information and the proposed museum space (to serve as a Facility of Public Accommodation) . I recommend close consultation with DEP during preparation of this section of the EIR. The proponent may wish to take advantage of the coordinated MEPA/Chapter 91 review process available under Section 9. 11 (2) (b) (4) of the DEP Waterways Regulations. Traffic and Parking: The ENF contained a traffic analysis that adequately addressed traffic issues, given the relatively small volume of traffic to be generated, and further analysis will not be required in the EIR. Parking at the site will include about 41 . spaces in surface parking areas . The EIR should identify how many parking spaces local zoning requires . If the number of parking spaces is greater than that required by zoning, the proponent must identify why additional parking is required. I ask the proponent to reduce surface parking as much as possible and increase open space areas . The EIR should describe how the number of parking spaces needed was determined. Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities: The EIR should contain plans that show clearly the boundaries of the proponent' s property and adjacent public lands, and it should show all potential access points between the different properties. The EIR should show where sidewalks currently exist in a map of the area and where the proponent proposes sidewalks. The proponent should discuss the width of all walkways and sidewalks proposed as part of the project. The EIR should show on a plan where pedestrian ,crosswalks along Lafayette Street are being proposed by the proponent/City.,of. .Salem/Townoof 4 EOEA #12741 ENF Certificate April 29, 2002 Marblehead to provide access from either side of the street . The EIR should identify the proposed bicycle facility improvements included with this project. The EIR should investigate all bicycle path connections and opportunities in the project area and determine where there are any linkage possibilities with the project. Wetlands : The Commonwealth has endorsed a "No Net Loss Policy" that requires that all feasible means to avoid and reduce the extent of wetland alteration be considered and implemented. The Wetland Section of the EIR must conform to this approach by first examining options that avoid impacts to wetland resource areas, their associated buffer zones, and the 100-year flood plain areas . In the Expanded ENE, the proponent. identified impacts to 30, 000 sf of Land Under the Ocean and Land Containing Shellfish (dredging contaminated mudflats) , 12, 800 sf of Coastal Beach (excavation & replacement of contaminated sand) , 5, 600 sf of Coastal Bank (excavation & stabilization) , and 400 sf of salt marsh excavation & restoration. Where it has been demonstrated that impacts are unavoidable, the EIR must illustrate that the impacts have been minimized, and that the project will be accomplished in a manner that is consistent with the Performance Standards of the Wetlands Regulations (310 CMR 10 . 00) . The EIR must address the significance of .the wetland resources on site, including public and private water supply; flood control; storm damage prevention; fisheries; shellfish; and wildlife habitat . All resource area boundaries, applicable buffer zones, and 100-year flood elevations should be clearly delineated on a plan. Each wetland resource area should be characterized according to 310 CMR 10 . 00 . The plans should show clearly the extent of Chapter 91 jurisdiction and Rivers Act jurisdiction (if any) . The text should explain whether the MCC, the SCC, and/or DEP have accepted the resource area boundaries, and any disputed boundary should be identified. = ' -Proposed.activities, including nconstructio_nmitigation, erosion and sedimentation control, phased` construction,,gandp.,w �- . 5 EOEA #12741 ENF Certificate April 29,2002 drainage discharges or overland flow into wetland areas, must be evaluated. The locations of detention basins and their distances from wetland resource areas, and the expected water quality emanating from said basins should be evaluated. This analysis should address current and expected post-construction water quality (including winter deicing and ;sanding analyses) of the predicted final receiving water body. Sufficient mitigation measures must be incorporated to ensure that no impacts will occur. The drainage analysis must insure that on- and off-site wetlands are not impacted by changes in stormwater runoff patterns. The EIR should describe any replication/restoration plans for wetland resource areas, such as salt marsh. It will need to explain the dredging portion of the project, the source of the fill material, and the grain-size distribution of imported material. Drainage: The EIR should present drainage calculations and detailed plans for the management of stormwater from the proposed project. It shouldinclude a detailed description of the proposed drainage system design, including. a discussion of the alternatives considered along with their impacts. The EIR should identify the quantity and quality of flows . The rates of stormwater runoff should be analyzed for the 10, 25 and 100-year storm events . If the proponent ties into the existing Lafayette Street drainage system or other Town of Marblehead or City of Salem drainage system, the EIR should clarify the permits required and if there will be a recharge deficit on-site. The EIR should indicate and discuss where the Lafayette Street drainage system discharges in this area . It should also be demonstrated that the proposed drainage system would control storm flows at existing levels . The EIR should discuss the need for a National Pollution Discharge Elimination System . (NPDES) General Permit from the U. S . Environmental Protection Agency for stormwater discharges from construction sites or from an industrial activity. The EIR should summarize the requirements of the NPDES General Permit for stormwater discharges from construction ,sitesisuch as best management practices and a Pollution Prevention `Plan: 6 EOEA #12741 ENF Certificate April 29, 2002 In addition, a maintenance program for the drainage system will be needed to ensure its effectiveness . This maintenance program should'outline the actual maintenance operations, responsible parties, and back-up systems . Historic/Archaeological Impacts: The EIR should identify the measures that will be developed by the proponent to minimize or mitigate the adverse effect of the project on two archaeological sites included in the . Massachusetts Historical Commission' s (MHC) Inventory of Archaeological Assets of the Commonwealth: the Lead Mills Site and the Forest River Lead Mills Tidal Gates. In its comment letter, MHC has anticipates that a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) will be developed by the lead Federal and state agencies to outline the steps that will be taken to mitigate adverse effects to any resources . The EIR should include a draft MOA or the signed final MOA. It should also summarize the findings of the intensive (locational) archaeological survey conducted on the site by the proponent . Hazardous Wastes: Many of the comments I received focused on issues of site contamination and remediation. The high concentrations of lead contamination in the soil present at the site are a serious public health and environmental exposure risk and a ' major obstacle to redevelopment of the site. According to the ENF, the proponent is proposing to remediate the site using an on-site treatment technology followed by the stabilization and capping of contaminated soils. It will utilize the proposed assisted living facility foundation slab as part of the final cap to isolate the highest concentrations of lead contaminated soils . DEP states that an Activity and Use Limitation may also be imposed on portions of the site. Consistent with MEPA policy and the regulations, these technical issues will be primarily addressed in the parallel regulatory process under M.G.L. Chapter 21E and the Massachusetts Contingency Plan. I note that a Public n Involvement Process has also be established, providing for enharicedIpublicv�review�and,comment on the development o site remediation measures . The'HEIR"should present, rfor»„w»•wpr�w, ._-.-. 7 EOEA #12741 ENF Certificate April 29,2002 informational purposes, *a summary of the results of any hazardous waste studies and remediation efforts undertaken or proposed at the site by the proponent. Construction: The EIR should present a discussion on potential construction period impacts (including but not limited to noise, dust, wetlands, and traffic maintenance) and analyze feasible measures that can avoid or eliminate these impacts . Mitigation: The EIR should include a separate chapter on mitigation measures. This chapter on mitigation should include a Draft Section 61 Finding for all state permits. The Draft Section 61 Finding should contain a clear commitment to mitigation, an estimate of the individual costs of the proposed mitigation and the identification of the parties responsible for implementing the mitigation. A schedule for the implementation of mitigation should also be included. I urge the proponent to incorporate the recommendations in the EENF' s traffic study as part of itsmitigation package. The proponent should evaluate the feasibility of pedestrian and bicycle improvements within this area. Circulation: The EIR should be circulated in compliance with Section 11 . 16 of the MEPA regulations and copies should also be sent to the list of "comments received" below and to Salem officials . A copy of the EIR should be made available for public review at the Marblehead and SAlerq Public Libraries . April 29, 2002 DATE Bob Durand Comments received: Kalis & Lucas, 3/29/02 Tony Sasso, 4/11/02 Robert Fraser, 4/12/02 Ann Fothergill, 4/13/02 0>:g46oclard v&-eCurran,w4/15/02 8 EOEA #12741 ENF Certificate April 29, 2002 MHC, 4/18/02 DEP/NERD, 4/19/02 Group Letter (10 Signatures) , 4/19/02 Richard J. Hannah, 4/19/02 Linda Higgins & Jim Heidenreich, 4/19/02 Linda Higgins, 4/19/02 Marblehead Conservation Commission, 4/22/02 Mr. & Mrs. Stuart M. Osattin, 4/22/02 Flory Denhard, 4/23/02 Linda Higgins, 4/23/02 Richard Grabowski, 4/24/02 Waterfront Alliance, 4/24/02 E12741 BD/WTG ��'*rt$, 9 f Phase II Scope of Work { Former Chadwick Lead Mills Site 1 LL 1 WOODARD &CURRAN Engineering - Science Operations i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 i 1 i � 1 i i 1 1 1 1 PHASE II SCOPE OF WORK CITY OF SALEM 1 COMPONENT 1 FORMER CHADWICK LEAD MILLS SITE SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 1 I1 1 1 - WOODARD&CURRANT 1- En mrin .Science O erations �' _ee88 Iviaui Streets uite 201 1 Wilmington,MA 01887 978-657-0555 January 2002 1 1 IVJEDfAWnjeco,1205777 Chadwick LealMilllwiplW&C Scope 1-23-03dic 1 1 CONTENTS ' LIST OF TABLES AND ILLUSTRATIONS....................................................................iii 1 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Site Background........................................................................................... 1-1 ' 1.2 Site Description............................................................................................ 1-2 1.3 Environmental Assessment History............................................................. 1-2 I ' 2 SCOPE OF WORK................................................................................................2-1 2.1 Shallow Soil Sampling.................................................................................2-1 2.2 Soil Boring/Well Point Installations............................................................2-1 2.3 Groundwater Sample Collection..................................................................2-2 2.4 Phase II Report Preparation..........................................................................2-2 3 DATA QUALITY.........................................................................:.........................3-1 4 TENTATIVE PROJECT SCHEDULE...............................................................4-1 APPENDIX A TABLE APPENDIX B FIGURES 11 IIDEDffAhMrtjrcn13U5?--C/wlwirk lealbfil/IwiplW&C Scnpe 1-27-ll2.Juc l ' TABLES AND ILLUSTRATIONS Table 1 Proposed Analytical Test Summary—Soil and Aqueous Samples Figures 1 Site Locus ' 2 Site Plan 3 Proposed Soil and Groundwater Sampling Locations in Relation to Concentrations of Total Lead Detected in Shallow Soil 4 Concentrations of Lead Detected in Groundwater II , i i IIDEDLL41Mraecixl1057i i Chadwick Leal Sfi1AwiplW&C Scope 1-13-02.doc 1 INTRODUCTION ' Woodard & Curran (W&C) has prepared this Phase II Scope of Work for the City of Salem Component of the Phase II investigation, in'accordance with the Massachusetts Contingency Plan (MCP, 310 C.M.R. 40.000), for the Former Chadwick Lead Mill Site, located at 485 Lafayette Street in Salem,Massachusetts("Site"). W&C is proposing to conduct an investigation of property owned by the City of Salem to investigate the soil and groundwater for potential impacts from historic industrial activities. The objective of this subsurface investigation is to obtain sufficient data to delineate the nature and extent of releases of Oil and/or Hazardous Materials that have occurred at the Site for the purposes of completing an MCP Phase II Comprehensive Site Assessment Report. Previous Phase II Investigation activities were conducted at the Site by Woodard & Curran in accordance with the initial Phase II Scope of Work which was submitted to the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection ("DEP") in January 2001. A supplemental Scope of Work has been developed with input through the Public Involvement Plan (PIP) process. During the fall of 2001, a Scope of Work for additional testing was presented to the public and comments were solicited. Where relevant and material to these response actions, such comments and suggestions were incorporated into the sampling plan presented herein. This Scope of Work describes the investigation activities that are to be conducted on land owned by the City of Salem. t1.1 Site Background The Chadwick Lead Mills Site consists of approximately 7 acres of lead impactedland located on the east side of Route 114 on the Salem/Marblehead line, formerly the Site of the Chadwick Lead Mills (Figure 1). The Site was operated as a gristmill by John Gardner of Salem and later the ' Wyman family from the 1730's through 1830. Lead production (primarily "White" lead as a pigment) began at the Site in 1830 by sea captain Colonel Francis Peabody. In 1843 the Site was purchased by the Forest River Lead Company to succeed Peabody's efforts. In 1884 the Chadwick ' Lead Works purchased the Forest River Lead Company. In March 1897, fire destroyed the mills, which were then rebuilt improved and expanded. By 1901 the Chadwick-Boston Lead Company was formed and operated the facility. Lead production was discontinued at the Site some time prior tol947. The Site was purchased in 1947 by the Associated Growers Cooperative and used as a grocery warehouse. In 1968, fire destroyed ' the facility and the Site was razed and abandoned. The Site is currently located on property owned by the City of Salem, the Town of Marblehead and Glover Estates, LLC. This scope of work proposes to investigate only that portion of the Site located on land owned by the City of Salem. IIDEDHAMIPye,1,120577701 d ick L,1.dA 11.ipM&C Scop,1.23-02 d. 1 The Site has been designated a Public Involvement Plan (PIP) Site under the Massachusetts i ' Contingency Plan (MCP). The PIP process facilitates public comment about MCP activities and requires responses from the Potentially Responsible Party. A scope of work for additional testing was originally presented to the public for comment on October 1, 2001 along with the Draft PIP Plan. Numerous comments were received from interested citizens during the comment period. Therefore, this Supplemental Scope of Work has been expanded to address concerns identified during this comment period, even where such an expanded investigation was not mandated by the ' provisions of the MCP. This scope of work is to perform the City of Salem component of the supplemental scope of work resulting from the PIP process. 1.2 Site Description The City of Salem owns the portion of the Site located to the west of the Forest River which is designated as Lots 235 and 236 on the Salem Tax Map. This land is owned by the City of Salem, by and through its Mayor and its Conservation Commission. 1.3 Environmental Assessment History Beginning in 1983, several site investigation activities have been conducted on or in the vicinity of the Site by a number of environmental assessment firms. To date none of the investigations has investigated whether the historic industrial activities has impact the land owned by the City of Salem. W&C is performing the proposed Scope of Work for the City of Salem component of the Site to determine whether the land owned by the City of Salem has been impacted by releases of Oil and/or Hazardous Materials as result of historical industrial activities. The following sections of this Scope of Work summarize the proposed investigation activities, including the data collection methods,analytical parameters, and sampling rationale. r IIDEDHAAM'ny,0,1105777 Chmlwick LeudMA ip1W&CScv,1-13-01.d1 2 SCOPE OF WORK The proposed activities will involve the investigation of soil and groundwater of the land owned by the City of Salem that was part of the Former Chadwick Lead Mill Site. The locations of the proposed investigation activities are shown on Figures 3. An Access agreement with the City of ' Salem has been obtained prior to performing the testing. Samples will be collected and analyzed at the laboratory following EPA and American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) approved analytical methods and/or procedures. Changes to the sampling locations may be made in the field ' due to physical access, ground refusal or other site-specific condition. The following sections outline each of the proposed sampling activities. 2.1 Shallow Soil Sampling ' Shallow soil samples are proposed to be collected at 4 locations on Salem property. All of the shallow samples are located on the west side of the Forest River(SS-44 through SS-47, see Figure 3). Shallow soil samples will be collected with a stainless steel hand auger from depths up to two feet below ground surface in order to assess near surface impacts. All soil samples will be homogenized prior to filling sample jars by placing the soils into a stainless steel mixing bowl, ' removing all twigs, rocks, and other debris, quartering, mixing and rolling the soils and then transferring the soils to the appropriate laboratory-supplied jar. Following sample collection, the samples will be placed on ice and submitted to the laboratory(Resource Laboratories—Portsmouth, ' NH)for analysis. As shown,all shallow soil samples will be collected for total lead analysis. In addition to the shallow soil samples, three composite beach/sediment samples (BS-11 through BS-13) will be collected from the upper 0.5 feet of the beach face area located on the western side of the Forest River (refer to Figure 3). This area represents the intertidal portion of the property (area between high and low tide). These composite samples will be collected from up to five sample locations within the composite area(noted as dashed lines on Figure 3). These samples will also be submitted to the laboratory for total lead analysis. 2.2 Soil BoringNVell Point Installations Two soil borings and one groundwater monitoring well point are proposed to be installed in Salem in order to assess horizontal and vertical extent of the contamination (soil and groundwater). The boring/well point locations are proposed to be advanced on the properties using either an All Terrain (ATV) Geoprobe unit or by manual drive/push techniques. Manual techniques consist of 2-1 IIDEDN.LNIPnjecla'1205777ChnJwick Lrod MilllwiplW&C Scope 1-23-II1Joc driving the probe equipment with a sledgehammer (or other labor-intensive mechanisms) to the desired probing depth. Both methods minimize the disturbance to the ground surface. Continuous soil samples will be collected during borehole advancement for geologic logging and soil jar headspace testing. A detailed geologic boring log will be prepared in the field documenting the drilling method, date, operation, geologist, geologic descriptions, and soil sampling results. Downhole drilling tools (probing rods, casing, and soil samplers) will be decontaminated prior to use and between each drilling location. Due to the proposed locations (i.e., on or very near the beach face, which will limit access of the drilling rig) of soil borings SB-34 and SB-35 and well point WP-08, these locations will be advanced using manual labor techniques. Most likely these locations will be advanced from between 4 to 8 feet below ground surface. Based on this assumption and to aid in determining the presence of lead in the material within these areas, it is estimated that between 2 to 4 soil samples will be collected from each boring location. All soil samples will be collected for total lead analysis. 2.3 Groundwater Sample Collection Following the well point installations, groundwater samples will be collected from each groundwater monitoring location and submitted to the laboratory (Resource Laboratories — Portsmouth, NH) for lead analysis by Method 6010B to provide sufficient information. to ' investigate whether a release of lead to groundwater is evident. The groundwater sampling will be conducted consistent with the USEPA Region 1 Low ' Stress (Low Flow) Purging and Sampling Procedure for the collection of groundwater samples from monitoring wells(July 30, 1996). 1 2.4 Phase II Report Preparation After the completion of the investigation activities and receipt of the laboratory analytical data, Woodard & Curran will evaluate the results of the field investigation and include these results in a Phase II Comprehensive Site Assessment Report that presents a description of this investigation and findings concerning the presence of a release(s)of contaminants to the environment at the Site. The report will include a Site diagram, showing the location of all soil sampling locations, soil borings, monitoring wells and key surface features, a groundwater contour map, hydrogeologic information, various hydrogeochemical maps (e.g. contaminant distribution), detailed boring logs, and all laboratory reports. Furthermore, Woodard & Curran will compare the field investigation results with the MCP to evaluate whether additional response actions are required to achieve a condition of no significant risk. This evaluation will include an interpretation of the data as it relates to any environmental risks associated with the release of contaminants at the Site. 2-2 IIDEDf/AMlpmjcctr11057i7Chmhvick LeaJMiII1wipIW&C Scope 1-23-01.dnc r rThe MCP allows the use of three different methods of risk characterization; Methods 1 and 2 entail comparison of Site concentrations to standard concentrations developed through conservative risk r assessment modeling conducted by the DEP,while Method 3 involves calculation of potential risks based upon site specific conditions and comparison of these estimated risks to risk management criteria that apply to the site. Methods 1 and 2 apply to sites where the media of concern are limited r to soil and groundwater. Based on the location of this site (abutting the Fore River and Salem Harbor), and the potential for contaminant migration to sediments and surface water, the Site- specific approach (i.e., Method 3) to characterize potential Site risks will in all likelihood be ' selected. Following completion of the draft report, the public will be notified of its availability (through the r PIP process) and public comment period wily commence. Section 4 of this report discusses the proposed project schedule. r r r r _ ' r r r r r r r r 2-3 IIDEDHMMry jecls1105i i i C'hndwick Lend Mi111 wiplW&CScope 623-01.dnc I ' 3 DATA QUALITY The quality of the environmental data collected as part of this investigation and previous investigations are currently being assessed through a quantitative and qualitative review of the sampling programs and data results. Given that the impacts at the Site cross several property I boundaries and several different environmental consultants have performed various data collection activities at the Site, the mechanism for this review was the quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC)program,which was developed and implemented specifically for this Site. ' Quality assurance (QA) is a management system to ensure that all information, data, and decisions resulting from the investigation are technically sound and properly documented. Quality control ' (QC) is the functional mechanism through which the quality assurance objectives are achieved. The overall objective of the QA/QC program for the Site was to establish procedures to monitor the integrity of the field data and laboratory analytical results such that the data obtained from the field and laboratory analyses are of adequate quality to satisfy the project objectives. Currently, data collected at the Site (including adjacent properties) by other environmental assessment firms is being evaluated through this QA process. The QA/QC objective for the investigation activities included in this scope of work will be to ensure that the data produced will be accurate, representative, complete,traceable, and reproducible. The QA/QC procedures that will be implemented for this investigation will include: t • Extensive field documentation (i.e., project sign-in books, bound field log books, task specific forms, health and safety sign-in sheets, instrument calibration sheets, chain-of- custody,etc.) Establishment of strict decontamination procedures for drilling and sampling equipment, ' etc. Collection and analysis of duplicate samples at a rate of one per ten samples collected. Collection and analysis of equipment/field blanks at a rate of one per each sampling day. ' • Calculations of relative percent differences for duplicate samples (acceptable range of less than or equal to 25 percent). Based on the results of the QA/QC procedures, an evaluation on the validity of the data will be completed and included in the Phase II Report. 3-1 IIDEDHAMIPrc jene1105i%i C'hrxlwick LeudMif4wip1W&C Scnpe I-13-03r/m i r 4 TENTATIVE PROJECT SCHEDULE ' The project schedule for conducting this investigation as described in this Scope of Work is tentatively scheduled to begin on or after January 21, 2002. The tasks described herein will take approximately 4 weeks to complete. This schedule is based on conducting the proposed activities at the level of effort, number of locations and number of laboratory analyses provided in this Scope. of Work. r Potential delays that may be encountered during this investigation include: 1) underground utility clearances; 2) unfavorable weather conditions; 3) laboratory analytical turn-around-times; 4) off- property access restrictions;and 5)regulatory agency involvement. Following completion of the investigation activities, the Draft Phase II Comprehensive Site Assessment will be completed. At this time, it is estimated to be complete and presented for public ' comment in June 2002. i r 1 r r 4-1 IIDEDfLLLAPmlec1a1205777ChnJwick LemlMr/AwipIW&C Scnpe/-l?-Ol.r/x 1 � j 1 1 1 i 1 l i1 1 1 1 1 - 1 1 f 1 1 1 1 ' APPENDIX A TABLE II , Table 1 ' Proposed Analytical Testing Summary - Soil and Aqueous Samples Additional Investigation Activities I ' Former Chadwick Lead Mills Salem, Massachusetts Requested ChemicaUPh sical Anal ses Sample Location Depth Total SVOCS/ AVS/ Grain Identifier (ft) Lead Metals EPH PAHs SEM TOC Size Notes Proposed Shallow Soil Sam lin SS-44 0-0.5 X SS-45 0-0.5 X ' SS-46 0-0.5 X SS-47 0-0.5 X QA/QC Samples ' Field Du licate 0-0.5 1 _ _ Fie Ban 0-0.5 1/ ay Froposed Soil Borin ell Point Installations SB-34 0-4 X Located to the west of the Forest River ' 4-8 X SB-35 0-2X Located on beach at mouth of Forest River 2-4 X WP-08 4.0 X Located to the west of the Forest River 8.0 X QA/QC Samples Field Du licate ' Field Blan 1/day Totals-Soil 10 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 Totals do not include QA/QC data Notes: X = The sample will be submitted for the analysis indicated. Total Lead = Laboratory analysis by USEPA Method 6010 Metals = RCRA 8 metals analysis plus beryllium.Laboratory analysis by USEPA Methods 6010(arsenic,barium,beryllium,cadmium,chromium,lead, ' selenium,and silver)and 7470/7471 (mercury). EPH = Laboratory analysis by MADEP Method for Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons SVOCs/PAHs = Laboratory analysis by USEPA Method 8270,8310,and/or MADEP EPH(with PAHs) AVS/SEM = Acid-volatile sulfides/simultaneously extracted metals. ' TOC = Total Organic Carbon. Field Chemistry Parameters = Surface water and groundwater measurements of pH,conductivity,temperature,depth and dissolved oxygen. Page 1 Table 1 Proposed Analytical Testing Summary - Soil and Aqueous Samples Additional Investigation Activities ' Former Chadwick Lead Mills Salem, Massachusetts ' - Re uested Chemical/Physical Analyses Sample Location Depth Field Chemistry ' Identifier (ft) Total Lead EPH SVOCs/PAHs Parameters[ Notes Groundwater/Surface Water Sample Collection WP-08 X X ' QA/QCSample Field Duplicate 1 NA Field Blank - I/da Totals-Aqueens Samples I - I 0 .' 0 - 1- - ' Totals do not include:QA/QC data -- ' Notes: X = The sample will be submitted for the analysis indicated. Total Lead = Laboratory analysis by USEPA Method 6010 ' Metals = RCRA 8 metals analysis plus beryllium.Laboratory analysis by USEPA Methods 6010(arsenic,barium,beryllium,cadmium,chromium,lead, selenium,and silver)and 7470/7471(mercury). EPH = Laboratory analysis by MADEP Method for Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons . SVOCs/PAHs = Laboratory analysis by USEPA Method 8270,8310,and/or MADEP EPH(with PAHs) ' AVS/SEM = Acid-volatile sulfides/simultaneously extracted metals. TOC = Total Organic Carbon. Field Chemistry Parameters = Surface water and groundwater measurements of pH,conductivity,temperature,depth and dissolved oxygen. Page 2 �� ,\ � � � � r � � � � � � � � � � � � APPENDIX B FIGURES I ' 1 1 Ji; '..��;=^" '1/ it cL �r ' � '1J _ - .. � i :i:i l .•.� d� t/7V1,/ Point - 1)11//{1 ' �` ('•. /,' t . :: � •�-._ ,Ln Wo t SScc I y, �• t f0 + Y.. !•yam" _v.,a3 % �: .---.�—`u � . f i I .. �l U S c SALEM g {f30RR �'� / --J�/r i �. South CoLnDus O �_ _. t..p{ b,�$e ' a_X16.8 i re - O 15 r � S Leg `` ✓— �.. err y� - 'O O sl - J i . ^� Tedesco. rnrl Trd U t/� 1 MILE ' ' J# �JO FEET 0 IOOOm lb 0 SOOm DES.BY: DR.BY:CJP CK.BY:MO FORMER CHADWICK LEAD MILL SITE 485 Lafayette Street Base Map Source: SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS TOPO!T"'@ 1996 FIGURE 1 Wildflower Productions SITE LOCUS ' SCALE: AS SHOWN JOB NO.:205777.01 DATE: September 2001 FILE NAME: SITE LOCUS ' WOODARD&CURRM Engineering- Science - Operations � 4M !' '4 i{ r ..t ♦.�`"" 1w^ .{' d W` � , a , F ,�� i1�S �. rr• � � � $ a- '�• .2eL 'E .{�y�y{��'``y "�' '��^ `` ' �'}�A hl.�x.b _ �/W/P-10 _ WP-06 1 it it;}"e a i ¢¢uT�f I "rA 'L s'4 ",. ��1E° i' yy� �,.• —_r �WP-o] taT G h 4P�i 1� p 11:5 `, \"WN of reRRIMMAD it CAY t��? .. :y -04 2J.7 CPW-3 \ �.✓ A o d •a•,t..r r c. I / WP-OS �cPw-z � MN-4 ee di�AlyWq` ND T / �f WP-03 l Tern w WA An1sv .I rF •r \ l.� mRavR trAv AYAIOIW errs'�° \ " �W-01 \ \ ' -p. ��— �� r x o f ND ��•� - __ a i t1 AWG-zOg 4.0 1 1 � •� �. ,, IND-zos N \ e n • se-o0 s e rte.,• °a � / TT 46.0 PWC y/ 0 30 60 \ - J / f - SCALE IN FEET { aR F INC81 lop IMG-z01.� NONRORING WELL LOCATION AND IDENTIFIER SO-Q+ PROPOSED SOIL BORING LOCATION AND IDENTIFIER W-10 (POTENTIAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING PaNT) Groundwater rM DRIVE POINT LOCATION AND IDENTIFIERT (POTENTIALCONCFNIRATION aF LEAD (MICROGRAMS PER LITER `— SEWERLINE Concentrations of Lead Detected in [ug/I)) DETECTED IN GROUNDWATER. SHADING ---»— WDE■ CONTOUR Former Chadwick Lead Mill Site ' INDICATES CONCENTRATION DETECTED IN MESS PROPERTY BOUNDARY Marblehead/Salem, Massachusetts S OF NCP STANDARD (30 ug/1) € WP-01+ PROPOSED WELL POINT LOCATION AND IDENTIFIER AWtLiLEf1EAD'S WALIOPROPERTY DOUNOARY NG TRAM.FOR THE TOWN OF &Ate\ ' i Engineering,Selene,Operations . �— _ _♦Das I r L .. I w r I - lao / — as. _ �1' t ATRWw� y - _ �c�_ iti... �' Se_Se I _ . 1" t �' _�/// 1•' —.� Gls�'' I L �-"®'%— �-�.r—•"` �_l•--�� -1- ' I �-- S1" kir'n `�� n��x'+A ��.p!P�• � d c,.F< % I _ I �s w-oe � { r.rnt 1' ,pl.� 1✓�� P � ? T J 1 ry `f � _ I FP LO� � M ^-__ FIs♦.®i I � � ' 16B f-I //,//'j� `/. ..G�'� XIS® ®e♦ Il (y'1 Jys 1, l rjMW�'!•`// SB-d] / _. ':-f'® ♦Cz5 HJD Nfl �i� \ > vj .1 s23L$f 4E�^ W4 ✓F` A DP 2i9 ala J/ � � / 130 84 ® NIp® MMN OF NAR9LL98AD { 3 ' 0SS-51 __ _C`9 SS-. ss-ze - 920 - � � - - )P-1 \ESs� ------ PIT o 5VA" jjp / ®� I D.L!'� _/'� J ♦® Ol -SD moo g ' 3 _I i/ m is •INS SPS p-Ni i f� ..�—®,Q - ` co -� 1' _ Y S-1 �_- Ej $SPw-1 ®/ mE�c=- __/._ - \ s� T " m �. 1,P ��m SS-29 / �y2 A zn w-lf•w...$r' 4.. T `_^ Y i%r E±'. sRa>o-s I '`[- e 3c - __uss�T MAR .i �M ...,�. �� Y i 1L i` .—. "�� zeD ® I \._� ss-IG ss i,]p ♦'2 �s9-14 TOIN OP YAFHfd'HeAO %—_12) spy C)$-,_. �e -- IS T3B 1]f' � i Pn/I `� \®® / pss-le , • r f �f \\ _ } ""ER BSN RAILROAD ! 5 ♦DRS I y ' �i..� m ♦ _ _ �_ r%-• I< sp s-la 1 /� SO-13 ' ss-A> / �=�-, ss Iz I� '''/ •® �� sD-tk - sz-e ro to. 'LTs�S,J ® ss zz z Izs s _ < is k seEn t / / s9-1e ♦ ep .�`�. \\ xie se « ♦i e s�y .:+>n ®♦20 Xpw s-n' zl4 sa 10 I l / Se-n ® �O9♦ ul y COT M ' J \ / ®{ sD-x0+ � ®•' ' pss « ss-ie/f �v-cs s q i. ♦15 1 � 1s _ ap ps-12 f .._..- j'/ Jiti i 1// ry-IDc� v GPw_5 ®�Z_.�_.�• -6J _ _—_ - o '4- / se_G 1 Blo +' C-205 i ♦3 �_ rim-... Wr-zoz / AI ss-13 /55 15p ! �•f� / 1 ♦i A s-«♦r/® x i — 3I`® ♦s'I> M-111 ®� pss-e� I N f �Ss-e 1\ I TP-IDS I 1 °°° 7//_, we-za3+ y / s-ID////p �/✓ // / / / i / \ s / / p _ • /NQ j -102 m o cPw-A I p i/ � /• II 5-3x +--204 / ! A,se-39 / s-z31 sR-z 's, ®/ ; ®♦' / ,e ro;oe . .. . - ss-a iJ'///'/- .n.... �, al•y.;.. Ass si �/i LWD-OLOT io COAST- 1" y$- pn}' ,1M l{'q STOflM FLOW/.GE ML TIE /'/ tyl e" k � s l9 FOREST RIVER(EI£vanUl 10.0) i /� \\\\pS �i/p® /✓p��// 11 /C ss-Ss ✓ � `/ /i C - i l �d scnLe w rgr Figure 3 y22♦ (C0�1JE"R s BY CEOPLLLCtXV.GLTCN IOoQF1EER wC-x01+ NONIMR1NG KF31 LOCAno.PND IDENEFUR - - PROPERTY/511E BOUNOMf- §_µQ P� MIFICXNLOW 50&SAMPI£LOGnoN Proposed Soil and Groundwater Sampling Locations in Relation ' ° 1994) —' '- 5"R" a y to Concentrations of Total Lead Detected in Shallow Soil pag/ 1♦ SNLLLOW SOIL StNn£LOCATION 95 1997) TER s9-15 504 B09NG LOGnON 1J10 IOFNIInER _ "MR $9-Sp� PROPOSED$OR RoflWG LOGDGN NNE)IDENTIFIER (WLLEGIFD BY MTCROWATi16, 1995-199>, T Former Chadwick Lead Mill Site OP-10 DRIVE POINT LOCATION ANO IDENTIFIER __yl_—_ INOIX CONIpTR W-04 PROPOSED NFIL POINT LOCATOR MD IDENTIFIER ss-Izp SHALLOW SOL SNIPLE LOGnON NID IDENTIFIER Salem/Marblehead, Massachusetts (COLLECTED BY wOO NRTO k CURRNN.x000-zC017 roiAL ION CONCENTRATORIAT 1N MCENTR1T PER PROPOSEp CONPos11E eE>cX sWPlt LOGnCN pTEST PIT LOWON NID IC£NTDER 39 RILOCR41.SWNING INDICATES CONCENn4.nON B$-11 p F T`-103 M'0 IDENIInER E NpN-30 OFSTiQ1El)MONITORING N91 LOGTON .09).D s NOT OF MCP R TOOL(LEN /y RAN �-10 OFACN 50.UPIF LOCATION AND IOEHIIFlFR m9/M9).NS NOT SWPLEO MR TOOL LEND. Eng1r,"ring,EJ{][E,,,L,JE\offort1 ' � Engineatlng.Sdanca Operoffona 1'1 I }.i� '�� : 1 rDL;r), e. r �n .,� r .' N t Fi.r, {{ .L t fih � < ,.• n 'J/'_`_---•_�----"._ / __'_"�- a a �' Yom^ s � .� a Ny F• } �I 'Air'n '^ a +x O t afSn t ille t �.e,4 /.t iti� uw�a to ,,woo r ri x w i v p a �i ?kct tm� "' :.� I ♦ .� < T �r �y,^ �., jd « '_ _ ... _ _ -. -. r�_'__•i � I3WRBOR wo�Fo�;. / I�J `^.-,.� �ovwr'�....J,,,�.:�•--'��--�- )!-! n a . 4 }13..'X.'t '. } e.., ♦ad '. " J, r: .., ' tiA� �' � , iit, 1 fir; 4. {.`r x"'A " ' ,kt •��Ir:'r. ° yet^ 5 a ct' r 114 t. ?F-:• .i-/-� /�/J /t� �'�� f �..- �� - �:'� ., �-..., '.ter---•�'� � �° % i 233 i ; I .. `.� � 1 , � \• f -�., l F-Tl� 235 I 36 - ----__ Nil \\ t r° r 237 1 I /• ;� /� � �i � ,: / i .7"� LEGEND / ^-t S �20-- INDEX CONTOUR \� 0� +f�� . ._., .— WATER —S— SEWER LINE SALEM/MARBLEHEAD TOWN LINE III � r d• •\� '�'� / � i^ PROPERTY BOUNDARY s /� • . r LOT NUMBER OBTAINED FROM TAX MAPS 237 31 (SALEM) AND 55 (MARBLEHEAD) I y Figure 2 QSite Plan j 030 so Former Chadwick Lead Mill Site Salem/Marblehead, Massachusetts WOODARD&CURRAN Engineering Sciartce Operations 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 WOODARD & CURRAN Maine 1 Massachusetts New Hampshire Connecticut ! Florida Illinois Operational offices across the U.S. ! 1-800-426-4262 www.woodardcurran.com 1