311 DERBY STREET - ZONING (3) Salem Flatbread
Salem, MA
Environmental •
v ,. `' 6,• � �: i -aJ l � , � is ` 1wY � wtiW�n .fi/L�-+�' ,wl
`.i Y '�w Y ��- • J. /,'� ni A i .I4�+• .A�� ���Y { f:�. /1 i/4 i1.. ` 44Y 4/ .W��Jy� J 4 � � �!
iin +.�l ,.u\.,iu Y..Yu Y a Y. / ` j Y 4 ` A Ir.� . 4 ..r 1. 1C1.` •• 1M.G.~� .Y..Y rr.� t11GL.-.r.� ..Y.•G
Y i.w. i. •�-h i j. ° ,J. J ♦ J4_..A AYY.�u_A yd._� L.w •!'-..1 /.,.r
" J YAe �n...w M0. I t. Y • /.. Y 1 4Y L � Lw 'J' : h. w !.� 4,
tis n � . �i.• � ...: . / �r.. Y•: a.. Y. _ _ r y r! ..:.g 1�
rYY ' .4•J 4 .1 .� 14�_ .b.
"'"` -� •w ; yr.Y -� �� 1 � ~ . 1 / M� NK'rp,wti�4ls�' .Gi '+ n,tw+- �..
f,i ���i�l■ . . iii■
ii
Preparedfor: Prepared by:
Salem Flat/read,
, LLC Susan St. Pierre Consulting Services
Georgetown, MA I
In Association With:
Patrowicz Land Development
•
Table of Contents
•
1. ENF Form
2. Figures
Figure 1 Locus Plan
A Figure 2 Aerial View
Figure 3 Existing Conditions Plan
Figure 4 Proposed Site Plan
Figure 5 Office Alternative
• Figure 6 Harbor and Land Commissioners Authorization No. 950 and 1874 Atlas Excerpt
Figure 7 Natural Heritage Map
3. Exhibits
•
Exhibit 1 Photos
Exhibit 2 Distribution List
Exhibit 3 List of Municipal and Federal permits
•
•
•
•
•
•
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
• Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs
Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act (MEPA) Office
• Environmental Notification Form
For Office Use Only
EEA#:
MEPA Analyst:
The information requested on this form must be completed in order to submit a document
electronically for review under the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act, 301 CMR 11.00.
Project Name: Flatbread Pizza
• Street Address: 311 Derby Street
Municipality: Salem Watershed: North Coastal
Universal Transverse Mercator Coordinates: Latitude:42031'10"
Longitude:70°53'32"
Estimated commencement date: Sept. 2016 Estimated completion date: June 2017
•
Pro.ect Type: Building Re-use for Restaurant Status of project design: 80%complete
Proponent: Salem Flatbread, LLC
Street Address: 258 Andover Street
Municipality: Georgetown State: MA I Zip Code 01833
Name of Contact Person: Susan St. Pierre
•
Firm/Agency: Susan St. Pierre Consulting Street Address: 74 Bal-
a View Ave
Munici alit : Salem State: MA I Zip Code: 01970
Phone:781-439-246 Fax: I E-mail:sst.pierre@comcast.net
Does this project meet or exceed a mandatory EIR threshold (see 301 CMR 11.03)?
• ❑Yes ®No
If this is an Expanded Environmental Notification Form (ENF) (see 3o1 CMR 11.05(7)) or a
Notice of Project Change (NPC), are you requesting:
• a Single EIR? (see 301 CMR 11.06(6)) ❑Yes ®No
a Special Review Procedure? (see 301 CMR 11.09) ❑Yes ®No
a Waiver of mandatory EIR? (see 301 CMR 11.11) [-]Yes ®No
a Phase I Waiver? (see 301 CMR 11.11) ❑Yes ®No
(Note: Greenhouse Gas Emissions analysis must be included in the Expanded ENF.)
Which MEPA review threshold(s) does the project meet or exceed (see 301 CMR 11.03)?
310 CMR 9.05 (1)(d)
Which State Agency Permits will the project require? MADEP Waterways Program, Chapter 91
License
•
Identify any financial assistance or land transfer from an Agency of the Commonwealth,
including the Agency name and the amount of funding or land area in acres: N/A
Effective January 2011
•
•
Summary of Project Size Existing Change Total
& Environmental Impacts
Total site acreage 0.41
New acres of land altered ° •
Acres of impervious area 0.41 0 0.41
Square feet of new bordering °
vegetated wetlands alteration
Square feet of new other wetland
alteration °
Acres of new non-water
dependent use of tidelands or °
waterways
STRUCTURES
Gross square footage 6,875 0 6,875 •
Number of housing units 0 0 0
Maximum height (feet) 19 0 19
TRANSPORTATION
Vehicle trips per day 31 48 7s •
Parking spaces 4 0 4
WASTEWATER
Water Use (Gallons per day) 1.980 +4,460 6,440
Water withdrawal (GPD) 0 0 0
Wastewater generation/treatment 1.800 +5,284 7,084
(GPD)
Length of water mains (miles) 0 0 - 0
Length of sewer mains (miles) 0 0 0
•
Has this project been filed with MEPA before?
❑ Yes (EEA# ) ®No
Has any project on this site been filed with MEPA before?
❑ Yes (EEA# ) ®No
•
-2-
•
•
GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION — all proponents must fill out this section
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
i49
Describe the existing conditions and land uses on the project site:
The 0.41-acre Project site is located at 311 Derby Street in Salem's downtown waterfront area along the
channelized elized South River(see Figure 1, Locus Plan). The site contains entirely pervious surfaces, including: an
0 existing single story, 19-foot high masonry building that formerly housed the Goodyear Tire and Rubber
company (see Figure 2, Site Aerial, Figure 3, Existing Conditions Plan, and Exhibit 1, Site Photographs); and a
paved parking area for 4 vehicles. The tire company ceased operations in March of 2016. The site is partially
comprised of filled tidelands 14,482+/- sf) and includes 141 +/- linear feet of Coastal Bank and is entirely
located within Riverfront Area and Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage.The site is accessed from a curb cut
on Derby Street and serviced by public water and sewer with adequate capacity. The site is level and
• stormwater currently sheet flows from the site to the municipal storm drainage system in Derby Street or into
the South River.
Describe the proposed project and its programmatic and physical elements:
• Salem Flatbread Pizza, LLC proposes to introduce new restaurant uses at an existing commercial property
located at 311 Derby Street in Salem, MA,formerly used as a Goodyear Tire Company retail store.The Project
includes renovating/repurposing the existing building on the property to accommodate the restaurant uses
and limited site improvements such as minor grading, pavement top coating/painting and new
fencing. Additionally, a new Harborwalk will be installed on the property along the South River.
• The building uses include a 100seat Flatbread Pizza restaurant, a small donut shop, and a future 50-60 seat
Tap Room Bar. As noted, the 0.41-acre Project site is located along the South River in Salem and currently
contains a single story former tire company building and associated parking and paved areas. The tire
company closed its business in the spring of 2016 and the building is currently being renovated and re-
purposed. About 80% of the site is located on filled tidelands and thus a Chapter 91 license is needed to
• authorize the proposed use and the addition of a Harborwalk along the South River.
The building footprint is approximately 6,848 square feet (sf) of which about half(3,400+/-sf) will house the
Flatbread Pizza restaurant and the other half will house the Donut Shop (1,020+/- sf) and the Tap Room Bar
(1,800 +/- sf) and ancillary uses. Restroom facilities are provided in the building which will be available for
• public use during normal business hours. The area in front of the restaurant on the Derby Street side and in
the rear of the building along the South River will include seasonal outdoor dining. A Harborwalk will also be
constructed along the South River frontage. The site will be accessed from an existing curb cut on Derby Street
and the existing 4 parking spaces located adjacent to the site entrance will remain. Minor grade changes (less
than 6 inches) are required in the rear of the site to meet the elevation of the Harborwalk on the adjacent
• Speedway service station site and to direct stormwater into two catch basins equipped with deep sumps that
will drain into an existing outlet in the South River. Stormwater along the Derby Street side of the property will
continue to sheet flow to the storm drainage system in Derby Street. For a depiction of these project elements,
please see Figure 4, Proposed Site Plan.
Construction Term:
•
The building renovations will be completed over the next few months. The Harborwalk, including minor site
grading and construction activities,will be installed in the spring/early summer of 2017.
• -3 -
•
Wetland and Waterways Impacts:
As described above,the site contains previously altered state wetland resources areas and is therefore subject
to the state wetland regulations and will require an Order of Conditions from the Salem Conservation
Commission. The wetland resources include Coastal Bank which is the granite seawall along the South River
as well as Riverfront Area and Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage both of which extend across the site. A
100-foot Buffer Zone extends from the top of the Coastal Bank inland across portions of the site. The Project
is a redevelopment project and impacts to wetland resources areas are temporary associated with limited site
improvements and the installation of a Harborwalk along the South River.
•
The Project will not result in any adverse impacts to state wetland resources areas. The Coastal Bank resource
is comprised of a granite seawall and no alterations to the seawall are proposed. The installation of the
Harborwalk and limited site improvements adjacent to the Coastal Bank will not affect the storm damage
protection or flood control function of the Coastal Bank resource area.The limited site improvements (minor
grading, pavement top coating/painting and new fencing) will temporarily impact the previously impacted
Riverfront and Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage resource areas. These temporary impacts will not affect
the function of these resource areas; the Riverfront Area is previously developed and the South River, which
abuts the site, is a tidal waterbody that can accommodate any flood waters that may be generated from the
site during extreme storm events.
Approximately 14,482+/- of the Project is located on filled tidelands (including private and Commonwealth •
tidelands) and is therefore subject to the state waterways regulations. The Project involves a change in use
from one nonwater-dependent facility of public accommodation (retail tire store/service facility) to other
nonwater-dependent facilities of public accommodation (restaurant uses). The City of Salem updated its
municipal Harbor Plan in 2007 (Salem Harbor Plan). The Salem Harbor Plan specifically encourages the use
of the project site for facilities of public accommodation such as restaurants. The Salem Harbor Plan also
calls for the installation of 20-foot wide, 10-foot clear/unobstructed Harborwalk for projects proposed along
the South River (where feasible).' The proposed Project includes such a Harborwalk. A Chapter 91 license
from the MADEP Waterways Program will be required for the proposed use and the addition of a Harborwalk.
The Project complies with the state Chapter 91 regulations as modified by the Harbor Plan to the extent
feasible and as follows:
• The existing building height (varying from 16.9 feet in the rear to a maximum of 19 feet in the front)
is well below the 55-foot height maximum allowed in the regulations.
• More than one square foot of open space is provided for every square foot of nonwater-dependent
building footprint (site area is 0.41 acres and building footprint(including overhangs) is 0.17 acres)
• The water dependent use zone (WDUZ) on the site extends approximately 24.6 feet inland from the
mean high water, portions of which are occupied by the existing nonwater-dependent building.
However, both the Chapter 91 regulations and the Harbor Plan include provisions that allow
existing nonwater-dependent structures to continue to occupy space within the WDUZ provided
the buildings are not expanded (see 310 CMR 9.51(3)(c) of the regulations and page 106 of the
Salem Harbor Plan).
• The Project proposes a Harborwalk along the South River. The building location on the site allows
for a 20-foot-wide Harborwalk to be constructed along all but approximately 19 feet of this
frontage where the.existing building is within 15 feet of the seawall.The Harborwalk will be
designed to match the adjacent Harborwalk on the adjacent Speedway service station property
which is comprised of a 10-foot wide concrete walkway with a railing providing 9 feet •
clear/unobstructed from the railing to the landward edge of the walkway. The landward 10 feet of
1 Page 43 of the Harbor Plan states that"All future development along the South Commercial Waterfront would be
required to provide,whenever feasible,the minimum 20-foot public accessway along the water's edge."
-4- •
•
the Harborwalk on the Project site will be used for seasonal outdoor dining(see Figure 4, Proposed
Site Plan).
Accordingly,the Project is not expected to have adverse impacts on tidelands.
•
Local Approvals
The Project has been reviewed and approved by the Salem Redevelopment Authority and will be reviewed
by the Salem Conservation Commission. The proposed change in use as well as the addition of a Harborwalk
• along the South River require authorization under the state Chapter 91 program pursuant to 310 CMR 9.05.
NOTE: The project description should summarize both the project's direct and indirect impacts
(including construction period impacts) in terms of their magnitude, geographic extent, duration
and frequency, and reversibility, as applicable. It should also discuss the infrastructure
requirements of the project and the capacity of the municipal and/or regional infrastructure to sustain
• these requirements into the future.
Describe the on-site project alternatives (and alternative off-site locations, if applicable), considered
by the proponent, including at least one feasible alternative that is allowed under current zoning,
and the reasons(s) that they were not selected as the preferred alternative:
• The site is very small (0.41 acres) and presents little opportunity for alternative site build outs. The site is
bounded by Derby Street to the north, an existing public walkway to the west, the South River to the south
and the Speedway service station to the east (see Figure 2, Site Aerial). The site contains an existing single
story structure that the Project Proponent is in the process of renovating/re-purposing to restaurant uses
within the existing structure. There are more intensive alternatives that the Proponent could pursue such
• demolishing the building and constructing a new 55-foot-high structure or adding a second story to the existing
building which would nearly double the size of the structure or building an addition to the structure to increase
the building footprint.
The site is located in the Central Development B5 District and thus, a variety of alternative uses such as
• retail or office could also be considered.The zoning does not impose any side yard, rear yard or frontage
requirements so the building footprint could be maximized and the maximum height is 70 feet; however,
because the site is on filled tidelands the maximum height is reduced to 55 feet.2
An office building with a footprint of 11,000 square feet and height of 55 feet height (or 5 stories) could be
constructed on the site (see Figure 5, Office Alternative). The office building would have eight times the floor
• area, occupy more than 1%: times the site area, extend 36 feet higher and generate 2 more vehicle trips per
day than the proposed use. The office building would also have a much greatervisual impact on the downtown
waterfront area and be incompatible with adjacent land uses. A No Build alternative would result in the
existing building remaining in place and a Harborwalk would not be constructed along the South River on the
property.
The Proponent investigated other properties in the vicinity but did not identify any feasible locations. The
Salem Harbor Plan suggests that the north-side of the South River include increased numbers of facilities of
public accommodation and the City of Salem supports the proposed restaurant uses.
• 'The regulations stipulate maximum height of 55 feet within 100 feet of the shoreline with an allowance for adding
additional 0.5 foot for every additional foot landward of the 100-foot line.
• -5-
•
An office use is not something the Proponent would pursue and the visual and traffic impacts of that
alternative are greater than the proposed Project. The office use is also not a facility of public accommodation
and therefore while allowed under zoning is not a use that the City of Salem would like to see in the downtown
waterfront area. The Proponent wanted to utilize the existing structure and did not propose adding a second
floor which would increase all impacts associated with the Project. •
Table 1 below identifies impacts resulting from each four alternatives: No Build; a two story restaurant
utilizing existing building footprint; a 55,000 square foot office building; and the Proposed Project, single
story restaurant uses.
•
Table 1
Alternatives Impact Comparison
Alternative Building #of Parking •
Footprint Spaces Sewer Water Estimated Av.
(sf) Generation Consum. Daily Traffic
(gpd) (gpd) Generation
No Build 6,848 4 1,800 1,980 31
2 story restaurant 13,696 4 12,880 14,168 157 •
Office 55,000 4 4,125 4,537 82
Preferred Plan 4 4 6,440 7,084 79
•
NOTE: The purpose of the alternatives analysis is to consider what effect changing the parameters
and/or siting of a project, or components thereof, will have on the environment, keeping in mind that
the objective of the MEPA review process is to avoid or minimize damage to the environment to the
greatest extent feasible. Examples of alternative projects include alternative site locations,
alternative site uses, and alternative site configurations. •
Summarize the mitigation measures proposed to offset the impacts of the preferred alternative:
The Project site is currently entirely developed with buildings or pavement and is totally impervious. The
Project is not proposing any additions to the building. A 69+/- sf cooler is being added to the rear of the •
building on top of an existing paved area. The proposed re-use of the property will not result in any adverse
impacts to the South River or the Coastal Bank, Riverfront or Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage resource
areas so mitigation is not required. The Project complies with the state chapter 91 regulations and in
accordance with the City of Salem Harbor Plan, a Harborwalk designed and constructed in accordance with
City of Salem standards,will be constructed along the South River.Two new catch basins will be equipped with
deep sump hoods to pre-treat stormwater prior to discharge in to existing outlet in South River. Provision of •
the Harborwalk will introduce public access to this site and this portion of the South River for the first time and
will provide an existing missing link between the City-owned Harborwalk along the west and south sides of the
River and the adjacent Harborwalk on the Speedway service station site.
If the project is proposed to be constructed in phases, please describe each phase: •
-6- •
•
AREAS OF CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN:
Is the project within or adjacent to an Area of Critical Environmental Concern?
[]Yes (Specify )
®No
• if yes, does the ACEC have an approved Resource Management Plan?_Yes _No,
If yes, describe how the project complies with this plan.
Will there be stormwater runoff or discharge to the designated ACEC?_
Yes _No;
If yes, describe and assess the potential impacts of such stormwater runoff/discharge to the designated ACEC.
• RARE SPECIES:
Does the project site include Estimated and/or Priority Habitat of State-Listed Rare Species?
(see hftp://www.mass.gov/dfwele/dfw/nhesp/regulatory_review/priority_habitat/priority_habitat_home.htm)
®
❑Yes (Specify ) No
HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES:
Does the project site include any structure, site or district listed in the State Register of Historic Place
• or the inventory of Historic and Archaeological Assets of the Commonwealth?
❑Yes (Specify ) ®No
If yes, does the project involve any demolition or destruction of any listed or inventoried historic
or archaeological resources? ❑Yes(Specify ) ®No
• WATER RESOURCES:
Is there an Outstanding Resource Water(ORW) on or within a half-mile radius of the project site? Yes X
No; —
if yes, identify the ORW and its location.
(NOTE: Outstanding Resource Waters include Class A public water supplies, their tributaries, and bordering
wetlands; active and inactive reservoirs approved by MassDEP; certain waters within Areas of Critical
• Environmental Concern, and certified vernal pools. Outstanding resource waters are listed in the
Surface Water Quality Standards, 314 CMR 4.00.)
Are there any impaired water bodies on or within a half-mile radius of the project site? _Yes X No; if yes,
identify the water body and pollutant(s) causing the impairment:
• Is the project within a medium or high stress basin, as established by the Massachusetts
Water Resources Commission? Yes X No
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT:
Generally describe the project's stormwater impacts and measures that the project will take to comply
with the standards found in MassDEP's Stormwater Management Regulations:
The project is a redevelopment project and does not propose any significant grading changes.
Currently stormwater in front of the building along Derby Street sheet flows off the site into the storm
drainage system located in the street. Stormwater from the rear of the site sheet flows off the site into
• the South River. The rear of the site will be slightly re-graded (six inches or less)to meet the grade of the
adjacent Harborwalk located on the Speedway service station site and two catch basins will be installed to
collect and direct stormwater into an existing outlet that discharges to the South River. The catch basins will
be equipped with deep sumps to pre-treat the stormwater prior to discharge into the tidal South River.
Scuppers will be drilled through the concrete block on top of the seawall to allow the sheet flow of
stormwater to the South River during extreme storm generated flood events. The entire site is currently
• covered with building and paving and the Project will not result in an increase in impervious area.
• -7-
•
MASSACHUSETTS CONTINGENCY PLAN:
Has the project site been, or is it currently being, regulated under M.G.L.c.21 E or the Massachusetts •
Contingency Plan?
Yes X No _ ; if yes, please describe the current status of the site (including Release Tracking Number
(RTN), cleanup phase, and Response Action Outcome classification):
The site has been used for auto service/retail tire sales since the mid 1960's. A Phase 1 Environmental
Site Assessment and limited subsurface investigation was prepared for the site by AECOM in June 2016. •
The Assessment was completed in April of 2016 for the former tenant. Borings were taken in the former
service bay areas and revealed the presence of EPH in two locations that exceeded values requiring
notification to MADEP. The report concluded that the EPH levels do not represent an environmental
exposure to use of the building as a restaurant (see Release Tracking Number 3-33756).
Is there an Activity and Use Limitation (AUL) on any portion of the project site? Yes_No X •
if yes, describe which portion of the site and how the project will be consistent with the AUL:
Are you aware of any Reportable Conditions at the property that have not yet been assigned an RTN?
Yes _No X , if yes, please describe:
•
SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTE:
If the project will generate solid waste during demolition or construction, describe alternatives considered
for re-use, recycling, and disposal of, e.g., asphalt, brick, concrete, gypsum, metal, wood:
The Project is renovating an existing structure and involves minimal demolition and construction activities. •
(NOTE. Asphalt pavement, brick, concrete and metal is banned from disposal at Massachusetts
landfills and waste combustion facilities and wood is banned from disposal at Massachusetts landfills.
See 310 CMR 19.017 for the complete list of banned materials.)
Will your project disturb asbestos containing materials? Yes _ No X •
if yes, please consult state asbestos requirements at http://mass.gov/MassDEP/air/asbhomO1.htm
Describe anti-idling and other measures to limit emissions from construction equipment:
Interior renovations utilize hand held tools.
Exterior work includes limited site improvements and installation of a Harborwalk along the South River.
Construction vehicles used for these activities will be very time-limited on the site. •
DESIGNATED WILD AND SCENIC RIVER:
Is this project site located wholly or partially within a defined river corridor of a federally
designated Wild and Scenic River or a state designated Scenic River? Yes_ No X
if yes, specify name of river and designation: •
If yes, does the project have the potential to impact any of the"outstandingly remarkable'
resources of a federally Wild and Scenic River or the stated purpose of a state designated Scenic River?
Yes _No _; if yes, specify name of river and designation:
if yes, will the project will result in any impacts to any of the designated 'outstandingly remarkable"
resources of the Wild and Scenic River or the stated purposes of a Scenic River. •
Yes _No _
if yes,describe the potential impacts to one or more of the outstandingly remarkable" resources or
stated purposes and mitigation measures proposed.
8 •
•
ATTACHMENTS:
• 1. List of all attachments to this document.
2. U.S.G.S. map (good quality color copy, 8-1/2x 11 inches or larger, at a scale of 1:24,000) indicating
the project location and boundaries.
3. Plan, at an appropriate scale, of existing conditions on the project site and its immediate environs,
showing all known structures, roadways and parking lots, railroad rights-of-way, wetlands and water
bodies, wooded areas, farmland, steep slopes, public open spaces, and major utilities.
• 4. Plan, at an appropriate scale, depicting environmental constraints on or adjacent to the project site
such as Priority and/or Estimated Habitat of state-listed rare species, Areas of Critical Environmental
Concern, Chapter 91 jurisdictional areas, Article 97 lands, wetland resource area delineations, water
supply protection areas, and historic resources and/or districts.
5. Plan, at an appropriate scale, of proposed conditions upon completion of project(if construction of
the project is proposed to be phased, there should be a site plan showing conditions upon the
• completion of each phase).
6. List of all agencies and persons to whom the proponent circulated the ENF, in accordance with 301
CMR 11.16(2).
7. List of municipal and federal permits and reviews required by the project, as applicable.
•
•
•
IIS •
•
•
LAND SECTION — all proponents must fill out this section
I. Thresholds/Permits
A. Does the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to land (see 301 CMR 11.03(1) •
Yes X No, if yes, specify each threshold:
The project requires the transfer of property from the City of Salem that is held for Article 97 land as
parkland (301 CMR 11.03(1)(3).
ll. Impacts and Permits •
A. Describe, in acres, the current and proposed character of the project site, as follows:
Existing Change Total
Footprint of buildings 0.16 0 0.16
Internal roadways 0 0 0
Parking and other paved areas 0.25 0 0
Other altered areas 0 0 0 •
Undeveloped areas 0.0 0 0
Total: Project Site Acreage 0.41 0 0.41
Note: a small cooler will be installed in the rear of the building impacting 0.0016 acres of currently
paved land.
B. Has any part of the project site been in active agricultural use in the last five years? •
_Yes X No; if yes, how many acres of land in agricultural use (with prime state or locally
important agricultural soils)will be converted to nonagricultural use?
C. Is any part of the project site currently or proposed to be in active forestry use?
_Yes X No; if yes, please describe current and proposed forestry activities and indicate
whether any part of the site is the subject of a forest management plan approved by the •
Department of Conservation and Recreation:
D. Does any part of the project involve conversion of land held for natural resources purposes in
accordance with Article 97 of the Amendments to the Constitution of the Commonwealth to any
purpose not in accordance with Article 97?_ Yes X No, if yes, describe:
•
E. Is any part of the project site currently subject to a conservation restriction, preservation
restriction, agricultural preservation restriction or watershed preservation restriction?
_Yes X No; if yes, does the project involve the release or modification of such restriction?
_Yes X No; if yes, describe:
F. Does the project require approval of a new urban redevelopment project or a fundamental change •
in an existing urban redevelopment project under M.G.L.c.121A? _Yes X No; if yes,
describe:
G. Does the project require approval of a new urban renewal plan or a major modification of an
existing urban renewal plan under M.G.L.c.121 B?Yes_No X ; if yes, describe:
III. Consistency •
A. Identify the current municipal comprehensive land use plan
Title: City of Salem Master Plan Update and Action Plan Date 1996
B. Describe the project's consistency with that plan with regard to:
1) economic development The Proiect will "contribute to the City's economic health through the
provision of lobs, customers for local businesses, and attraction of visitors." •
2) adequacy of infrastructure The Proiect is renovating and re-using an existing building and
developed site with adequate infrastructure.
- i0-
•
3) open space impacts The Project will add a 20-foot wide +/- Harborwalk along the South
River thereby increasing public access on the site and Providing a connection to the adjacent
Harborwalk system.
4) compatibility with adjacent land uses The proposed restaurant uses are located in the
downtown waterfront area of the City of Salem and are compatible with adiacent uses in this
mixed use area. There is a service station located on one side of the property, a public walkway
located on another side and the South River located on another.
C. Identify the current Regional Policy Plan of the applicable Regional Planning Agency (RPA)
RPA: Metropolitan Area Planning Council
Title: Metro Future Regional Plan Date 2008 and Metropolitan Area Planning Council Strategic
Plan 2015-2020 Date 2014
D. Describe the projecfs consjstency with that plan with regard to:
1) economic development The Project is consistent with smart growth principles as the project is
a renovation and re-use of an existing building in the downtown area of Salem that will add to the
• vibrancy of the area.
2) adequacy of infrastructure complies Goal 1 is to focus new growth through reuse of
Previously developed land and buildings. Goal 2 suggests that throughout the region most new
growth will occur through reuse of previously developed land and buildings
3) open space impacts The Proiect will add a 20-foot wide Harborwalk along the South River
providing another important connection to this important public realm feature
I •
u
•
i
RARE SPECIES SECTION
I. Thresholds/ Permits
A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to rare species or habitat (see
301 CMR 11.03(2))? _Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms:
(NOTE. If you are uncertain, it is recommended that you consult with the Natural Heritage and
Endangered Species Program (NHESP)prior to submitting the ENF.)
B. Does the project require any state permits related to rare species or habitat? _Yes X •
No
C. Does the project site fall within mapped rare species habitat(Priority or Estimated Habitat?) in the
current Massachusetts Natural Heritage Atlas (attach relevant page)? _Yes X No.
See Figure 6, Natural Heritage GIS Map.
D. If you answered "No"to all questions A, B and C, proceed to the Wetlands,Waterways, and
Tidelands Section. If you answered "Yes"to either question A or question B, fill out the
remainder of the Rare Species section below.
II. Impacts and Permits •
A. Does the project site fall within Priority or Estimated Habitat in the current Massachusetts Natural
Heritage Atlas (attach relevant page)? _Yes_ No. If yes,
1. Have you consulted with the Division of Fisheries and Wildlife Natural Heritage and
Endangered Species Program (NHESP)? _Yes_No; if yes, have you received a
determination as to whether the project will result in the"take" of a rare species? _Yes
No, if yes, attach the letter of determination to this submission.
2. Will the project"take"an endangered, threatened, and/or species of special concern in
accordance with M.G.L. c.131A(see also 321 CMR 10.04)? _Yes_No; if yes, provide a
summary of proposed measures to minimize and mitigate rare species impacts
3. Which rare species are known to occur within the Priority or Estimated Habitat? •
4. Has the site been surveyed for rare species in accordance with the Massachusetts
Endangered Species Act? _Yes_No
4. If your project is within Estimated Habitat, have you filed a Notice of Intent or received an
Order of Conditions for this project? _Yes_No, if yes, did you send a copy of the Notice •
of Intent to the Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program, in accordance with the
Wetlands Protection Act regulations? _Yes_ No
B. Will the project"take" an endangered, threatened, and/or species of special concern in
accordance with M.G.L. c.131A(see also 321 CMR 10.04)? _Yes _ No; if yes, provide a
summary of proposed measures to minimize and mitigate impacts to significant habitat: •
•
•
•
WETLANDS, WATERWAYS, AND TIDELANDS SECTION
I. Thresholds/ Permits
• A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to wetlands,waterways, and
tidelands (see 301 CMR 11.03(3))? X Yes_ No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms:
The Project requires a Tidelands license pursuant to 310 CMR 9.00. The Project will change the use
from one, existing nonwater-dependent use (retail tire sales/service) to another retail nonwater-
dependent use (restaurant) on a 0.41-acre site, a portion of which (14,482 sf) is located within filled
• tidelands. Both the existing and proposed retail uses are defined as facilities of public
accommodation.
B. Does the project require any state permits (or a local Order of Conditions) related to wetlands,
waterways,or tidelands? X Yes_No; if yes, specify which permit:
• The Project requires a Tidelands License pursuant to 310 CMR 9.00, and an Order of Conditions will
be required form the City of Salem Conservation Commission for work proposed in wetland resource
areas.
C. If you answered "No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Water Supply Section. If you
answered "Yes"to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Wetlands, Waterways,
• and Tidelands Section below.
II. Wetlands Impacts and Permits
A. Does the project require a new or amended Order of Conditions under the Wetlands Protection
Act(M.G.L. c.1 31A)? X Yes_No; if yes, has a Notice of Intent been filed?_ Yes X
_ No; if yes, list the date and MassDEP file number: ; if yes, has a local Order of
Conditions been issued? _ Yes X No; Was the Order of Conditions appealed?_Yes
• No. Will the project require a Variance from the Wetlands regulations?_Yes X No
B. Describe any proposed permanent or temporary impacts to wetland resource areas located on
the project site: No permanent impacts to wetland resource areas are proposed. Temporary
impacts will occur within Riverfront Area and Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage from site
improvements proposed on previously paved areas.
•
C.
C. Estimate the extent and type of impact that the project will have on wetland resources, and
indicate whether the impacts are temporary or permanent:
Coastal Wetlands Area (square feet) or Temporary or
• Length (linear feet) Permanent Impact
Land Under the Ocean
Designated Port Areas
Coastal Beaches
Coastal Dunes
Barrier Beaches
Coastal Banks
• Rocky Intertidal Shores
Salt Marshes
Land Under Salt Ponds
Land Containing Shellfish
Fish Runs
Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage 9,750 Temporary impacts to previously altered land
•
13-
•
Inland Wetlands
Bank (If)
Bordering Vegetated Wetlands •
Isolated Vegetated Wetlands
Land under Water
Isolated Land Subject to Flooding
Bordering Land Subject to Flooding
Riverfront Area 9,750 Temporary impacts to Previously altered land
D. Is any part of the project: •
1. proposed as a limited project? _Yes X No; if yes, what is the area (in so?_
2. the construction or alteration of a dam? _Yes X No; if yes, describe:
3. fill or structure in a velocity zone or regulatory floodway? _Yes X No
4. dredging or disposal of dredged material? Yes X No, if yes, describe the volume
of dredged material and the proposed disposal site: •
5. a discharge to an Outstanding Resource Water(ORW) or an Area of Critical
Environmental Concern (ACEC)? _Yes X No
6. subject to a wetlands restriction order? Yes X No; if yes, identify the area (in so:
7. located in buffer zones? X Yes_No; if yes, how much (in so 13,632
E. Will the project:
1. be subject to a local wetlands ordinance or bylaw? X Yes No •
2. alter any federally-protected wetlands not regulated under state law? _Yes X No; if
yes, what is the area (so?
III.Waterways and Tidelands Impacts and Permits
A. Does the project site contain waterways or tidelands (including filled former tidelands)that are
subject to the Waterways Act, M.G.L.c.91? X Yes_ No, if yes, is there a current Chapter •
91 License or Permit affecting the project site? X Yes_No; if yes, list the date and
license or permit number and provide a copy of the historic map used to determine extent of
filled tidelands:
Harbor and Land Commissioners Authorization No. 950 issued 1886 and 1874 Atlas (see
Figure 7). Additionally,the U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Hydrography of Salem Harbor
dated 1894 was used to determine historic low water. •
D. Does the project require a new or modified license or permit under M.G.L.c.91? X Yes_No, if
yes, how many acres of the project site subject to M.G.L.c.91 will be for non-water-dependent
use? Current 0.33 acres Change-0.06 acres Total 0.27 acres (20 foot wide Harborwalk is
water-dependent)
If yes, how many square feet of solid fill or pile-supported structures (in so? •
No new fill or pile supported structures proposed
D. For non-water-dependent use projects, indicate the following:
Area of filled tidelands on the site: 14,482 square feet(0.33 acres)
Area of filled tidelands covered by buildings: 7.150 sf
For portions of site on filled tidelands, list ground floor uses and area of each use: •
Restaurant uses will occupy entire ground floor
Does the project include new non-water-dependent uses located over flowed tidelands?
Yes_ No_
Height of building on filled tidelands: •
The existing building ranges from 16.9 feet+/-in the rear to a maximum of 19 feet in the
front side of the building facing Derby Street.
14-
•
•
Also show the following on a site plan: Mean High Water, Mean Low Water, Water-
dependent Use Zone, location of uses within buildings on tidelands, and interior and
exterior areas and facilities dedicated for public use, and historic high and historic low water
• marks. See Figure 1, Existing Conditions Plan and Figure 4 Proposed Site Plan.
E. Is the project located on landlocked tidelands? Yes _X No; if yes, describe the project's
impact on the public's right to access, use and enjoy jurisdictional tidelands and describe
measures the project will implement to avoid, minimize or mitigate any adverse impact:
• F. Is the project located in an area where low groundwater levels have been identified by a
municipality or by a state or federal agency as a threat to building foundations?_Yes_X
No, if yes, describe the project's impact on groundwater levels and describe measures the
project will implement to avoid, minimize or mitigate any adverse impact:
G. Is the project non-water-dependent and located on landlocked tidelands or waterways or
• tidelands subject to the Waterways Act and subject to a mandatory EIR?_Yes X No;
(NOTE. If yes, then the project will be subject to Public Benefit Review and Determination.)
H. Does the project include dredging?_Yes X No, if yes, answer the following questions:
What type of dredging? Improvement_ Maintenance_Both
What is the proposed dredge volume, in cubic yards (cys)
What is the proposed dredge footprint_length (ft)_width (ft)_depth (ft);
• Will dredging impact the following resource areas?
Intertidal Yes_ No_; if yes, _sq ft
Outstanding Resource Waters Yes_ No_, if yes, _sq ft
Other resource area (i.e. shellfish beds, eel grass beds) Yes_ No_, if yes_
sq ft
If yes to any of the above, have you evaluated appropriate and practicable steps to: 1)
• avoidance; 2) if avoidance is not possible, minimization; 3) if either avoidance or minimize is
not possible, mitigation?
If no to any of the above, what information or documentation was used to support this
determination?
Provide a comprehensive analysis of practicable alternatives for improvement dredging in
accordance with 314 CMR 9.07(1)(b). Physical and chemical data of the
• sediment shall be included in the comprehensive analysis.
Sediment Characterization
Existing gradation analysis results? _Yes_No: if yes, provide results.
Existing chemical results for parameters listed in 314 CMR 9.07(2)(b)6?_Yes _No; if
yes, provide results.
• Do you have sufficient information to evaluate feasibility of the following management options
for dredged sediment? If yes, check the appropriate option.
Beach NourishmentDis_
Unconfined Ocean posal
Confined Disposal:
Confined Aquatic Disposal (CAD)_
• Confined Disposal Facility (CDF)_
Landfill Reuse in accordance with COMM-97-001 _
Shoreline Placement_
Upland Material Reuse_
In-State landfill disposal_
Out-of-state landfill disposal
• (NOTE. This information is required for a 401 Water Quality Certification.)
IV. Consistency:
A. Does the project have effects on the coastal resources or uses, and/or is the project located within
15-
•
the Coastal Zone? X Yes_No, if yes, describe these effects and the projects consistency with
the policies of the Office of Coastal Zone Management:
Stormwater Management •
Water Quality Policy 1 "Ensure that nonpoint pollution controls promote the attainment of state
surface water quality standards in the coastal zone."
Water Quality Policy 2 "Ensure that point-source discharges in or affecting the coastal zone are
consistent with federally approved state effluent limitations and water quality standards
The Project is a redevelopment project renovating/re-purposing an existing building. The Project •
will install two catch basins in the rear of the property equipped with deep sumps that will pre-
treat stormwater prior to discharge to an existing outlet into the South River.
Coastal Hazards
Coastal Hazard Policy 1 "Preserve, protect, restore, and enhance the beneficial functions of storm •
damage prevention and flood control provided by natural coastal landforms, such as dunes,
beaches, barrier beaches, coastal banks, land subject to coastal storm flow, salt marshes, and
land under the ocean."
The site does not contain any natural coastal landforms. The site does contain land subject to
coastal storm flow however no new buildings are proposed in this area. While a Harborwalk will •
be installed along the shoreline,this portion of the site will drain toward two new catch basins that
will discharge to the South River through an existing outlet. The minor grading required to direct
stormwater to the catch basins will not affect flooding. The South River is tidal and has capacity to
handle stormwater drainage during normal rainfall and storm generated flood events.
•
Public Access
Public Access Policy 1 "Ensure that developments proposed near existing public recreation sites
minimize their adverse effects."
Public Access Management Principle 1 Improve public access to coastal recreation facilities and
alleviate auto traffic and parking problems through improvements in public transportation. Link •
existing coastal recreation sites to each other or to nearby coastal inland facilities via trails for
bicyclists, hikers, and equestrians, and via rivers for boaters.
Public Access Management Principle 2 Increase capacity of existing recreation areas by
facilitating multiple use and by improving management maintenance and public support
facilities. Resolve conflicting uses whenever possible through improved management rather than
through exclusion of uses. •
The Project will improve public access by providing a new 20-foot wide Harborwalk along the South
River,which will link currently disconnected elements of the Harborwalk.
Growth Management
Growth Management Principal •
"Encourage the revitalization and enhancement of existing development centers in the coastal zone
through technical assistance and federal and state financial supportfor residential,commercial and
industrial development."
The Project is consistent with the stated management principles as the Project site is located in an
existing urban neighborhood located in close proximity to the downtown and the MBTA commuter •
rail station. The site contains and existing building which is being re-purposed.
- 16-
•
•
B. Is the project located within an area subject to a Municipal Harbor Plan? X Yes No; if yes,
identify the Municipal Harbor Plan and describe the project's consistency with that plan:
• Salem 2007 Harbor Plan. The Project proposes restaurant uses which are defined as facilities of
public accommodation that will help activate the Harbor and the water's edge (see pages x and 21 of
the Harbor Plan). The Project includes a Harborwalk along the South River which is also envisioned
in the Harbor Plan. The Project will allow public use of the restroom facilities located in the
restaurant during normal operating hours.
•
•
I •
I •
•
•
•
•
t7_
•
•
WATER SUPPLY SECTION
I. Thresholds/ Permits
A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to water supply (see 301 CMR •
11.03(4))? _Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms:
B. Does the project require any state permits related to water supply? _Yes X No; if yes,
specify which permit:
C. If you answered "No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Wastewater Section. If you answered •
"Yes"to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Water Supply Section below.
II. Impacts and Permits
A. Describe in gallons per da d the volume and source of water use for existing and proposed
9 P Y (gpd), 9 P P
activities at the project site:
Existin Change Total •
Municipal or regional water supply
Withdrawal from groundwater
Withdrawal from surface water
Interbasin transfer
(NOTE. Interbasin Transfer approval will be required if the basin and community where the proposed
water supply source is located is different from the basin and community where the wastewater from •
the source will be discharged.)
B. If the source is a municipal or regional supply, has the municipality or region indicated that there
is adequate capacity in the system to accommodate the project?_Yes_ No
C. If the project involves a new or expanded withdrawal from a groundwater or surface water •
source, has a pumping test been conducted? Yes_No; if yes, attach a map of the drilling
sites and a summary of the alternatives considered and the results.
D. What is the currently permitted withdrawal at the proposed water supply source (in gallons per
day)? Will the project require an increase in that withdrawal?_Yes _No, if yes, then how
much of an increase (gpd)? •
E. Does the project site currently contain a water supply well, a drinking water treatment facility,
water main, or other water supply facility, or will the project involve construction of a new facility?
Yes_No. If yes, describe existing and proposed water supply facilities at the project site:
Permitted Existing Avg Project Flow Total
Flow Daily Flow •
Capacity of water supply well(s) (gpd)
Capacity of water treatment plant(gpd)
F. If the project involves a new interbasin transfer of water, which basins are involved, what is the
direction of the transfer, and is the interbasin transfer existing or proposed?
G. Does the project involve: •
1. new water service by the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority or other agency of
the Commonwealth to a municipality or water district? _Yes_No
2. a Watershed Protection Act variance? _ t u
Yes_No; if yes, how many acres of alteration?
3. a non-bridged stream crossing 1,000 or less feepstream of a public surface drinking water
supply for purpose of forest harvesting activities? _Yes_No
•
III. Consistency
Describe the project's consistency with water conservation plans or other plans to enhance water
resources, quality, facilities and services:
- rg-
•
•
WASTEWATER SECTION
• I. Thresholds/Permits
A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to wastewater(see 301 CMR
11.03(5))? _Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms:
B. Does the project require any state permits related to wastewater? _Yes X No, if yes,
specify which permit:
• C. If you answered "No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Transportation --Traffic
Generation Section. If you answered "Yes"to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder
of the Wastewater Section below.
II. Impacts and Permits
A. Describe the volume (in gallons per day) and type of disposal of wastewater generation for
• existing and proposed activities at the project site (calculate according to 310 CMR 15.00 for septic
systems or 314 CMR 7.00 for sewer systems):
Existing Change Total
Discharge of sanitary wastewater
• Discharge of industrial wastewater
TOTAL
Existing Change Total
Discharge to groundwater
Discharge to outstanding resource water
Discharge to surface water
• Discharge to municipal or regional wastewater
facility
TOTAL
B. Is the existing collection system at or near its capacity? _Yes_No; if yes, then describe the
• measures to be undertaken to accommodate the project's wastewater flows:
C. Is the existing wastewater disposal facility at or near its permitted capacity?_Yes_No; if
yes, then describe the measures to be undertaken to accommodate the project's wastewater flows:
• D. Does the project site currently contain a wastewater treatment facility, sewer main, or other
wastewater disposal facility, or will the project involve construction of a new facility? _Yes
No; if yes, describe as follows:
Permitted Existing Avg Project Flow Total
• Daily Flow
Wastewater treatment plant capacity
(in gallons per day)
E. If the project requires an interbasin transfer of wastewater, which basins are involved, what is the
direction of the transfer, and is the interbasin transfer existing or new?
•
(NOTE: Interbasin Transfer approval may be needed if the basin and community where wastewater
will be discharged is different from the basin and community where the source of water supply is
located.)
19-
•
•
F. Does the project involve new sewer service by the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority
(MWRA) or other Agency of the Commonwealth to a municipality or sewer district? _Yes_ No
G. Is there an existing facility, or is a new facility proposed at the project site for the storage, •
treatment, processing, combustion or disposal of sewage sludge, sludge ash, grit, screenings,
wastewater reuse (gray water) or other sewage residual materials? _Yes_ No; if yes, what is
the capacity (tons per day):
Existing Change Total
Storage •
Treatment
Processing
Combustion
Disposal
H. Describe the water conservation measures to be undertaken by the project, and other wastewater
mitigation, such as infiltration and inflow removal.
III. Consistency
Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with applicable state, regional, and local
plans and policies related to wastewater management:
If the project requires a sewer extension permit, is that extension included in a comprehensive •
wastewater management plan? _Yes_No; if yes, indicate the EEA number for the plan and
whether the project site is within a sewer service area recommended or approved in that plan:
•
•
•
•
•
-20-
•
•
TRANSPORTATION SECTION (TRAFFIC GENERATION)
• I. Thresholds/Permit
A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to traffic generation (see 301 CMR
11.03(6))? _Yes X No, if yes, specify, in quantitative terms:
B. Does the project require any state permits related to state-controlled roadways?_Yes X
No; if yes, specify which permit:
• C. If you answered "No" to both questions A and B, proceed to the Roadways and Other
Transportation Facilities Section. If you answered "Yes"to either question A or question B, fill out the
remainder of the Traffic Generation Section below.
II. Traffic Impacts and Permits
A. Describe existing and proposed vehicular traffic generated by activities at the project site:
• Existing Change Total
Number of parking spaces
Number of vehicle trips per day
ITE Land Use Code(s):
B. What is the estimated average daily traffic on roadways serving the site?
•
Roadway Existing Change Total
1.
2.
3.
C. If applicable, describe proposed mitigation measures on state-controlled roadways that the
• project proponent will implement:
D. How will the project implement and/or promote the use of transit, pedestrian and bicycle facilities
and services to provide access to and from the project site?
E. Is there a Transportation Management Association (TMA)that provides transportation demand
• management (TDM) services in the area of the project site? _Yes X No; if yes, describe if
and how will the project will participate in the TMA:
F. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of)water, rail, or air transportation
facilities?_Yes X No, if yes, generally describe:
• G. If the project will penetrate approach airspace of a nearby airport, has the proponent filed a
Massachusetts Aeronautics Commission Airspace Review Form (780 CMR 111.7) and a Notice of
Proposed Construction or Alteration with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) (CFR Title 14
Part 77.13, forms 7460-1 and 7460-2)?
Ill. Consistency
• Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with municipal, regional, state, and federal
plans and policies related to traffic, transit, pedestrian and bicycle transportation facilities and services:
•
-21 -
•
•
TRANSPORTATION SECTION (ROADWAYS AND OTHER TRANSPORTATION
FACILITIES)
I. Thresholds •
A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to roadways or other
transportation facilities (see 301 CMR 11.03(6))? _Yes X No, if yes, specify, in quantitative
terms:
B. Does the project require any state permits related to roadways or other transportation
facilities? _Yes X No; if yes, specify which permit: •
C. If you answered "No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Energy Section. If you
answered "Yes"to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Roadways Section
below.
It. Transportation Facility Impacts •
A. Describe existing and proposed transportation facilities in the immediate vicinity of the project
site:
B. Will the project involve any
1. Alteration of bank or terrain (in linear feet)? •
2. Cutting of living public shade trees (number)?
3. Elimination of stone wall (in linear feet)?
III. Consistency -- Describe the project's consistency with other federal, state, regional, and local plans
and policies related to traffic, transit, pedestrian and bicycle transportation facilities and services,
including consistency with the applicable regional transportation plan and the Transportation
Improvements Plan (TIP), the State Bicycle Plan, and the State Pedestrian Plan: •
•
•
•
•
_zz_
•
•
ENERGY SECTION
• I. Thresholds I Permits
A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to energy (see 301 CMR 11.03(7))?
Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms:
B. Does the project require any state permits related to energy?_ Yes X No; if yes, specify
which permit:
•
C. If you answered "No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Air Quality Section. If you
answered "Yes"to either question A or question B. fill out the remainder of the Energy Section
below.
•
H. Impacts and Permits
A. Describe existing and proposed energy generation and transmission facilities at the project site:
Existing Change Total
Capacity of electric generating facility(megawatts)
Length of fuel line (in miles)
• Length of transmission lines (in miles)
Capacity of transmission lines (in kilovolts)
B. If the project involves construction or expansion of an electric generating facility, what are:
1. the facility's current and proposed fuel source(s)?
2. the facility's current and proposed cooling source(s)?
• C. If the project involves construction of an electrical transmission line, will it be located on a new,
unused, or abandoned right of way?_Yes_No; if yes, please describe:
D. Describe the project's other impacts on energy facilities and services:
III. Consistency
• Describe the project's consistency with state, municipal, regional, and federal plans and policies for
enhancing energy facilities and services: The Project will comply with applicable state, municipal,
regionals and federal plans and policies for enhancing energy facilities and services. An updated
RES approval will be secured from the state.
-23-
•
•
AIR QUALITY SECTION
I. Thresholds
A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to air quality (see 301 CMR •
11.03(8))? _Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms:
B. Does the project require any state permits related to air quality? _Yes X No, if yes,
specify which permit:
C. If you answered "No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Solid and Hazardous Waste •
Section. If you answered "Yes"to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Air
Quality Section below.
Il. Impacts and Permits
A. Does the project involve construction or modification of a major stationary source (see 310 CMR
7.00, Appendix A)?_Yes_ No, if yes, describe existing and proposed emissions (in tons
per day) of:
Existing Change Total
Particulate matter
Carbon monoxide •
Sulfur dioxide
Volatile organic compounds
Oxides of nitrogen
Lead
Any hazardous air pollutant
Carbon dioxide •
B. Describe the project's other impacts on air resources and air quality, including noise impacts:
III. Consistency
A. Describe the project's consistency with the State Implementation Plan: •
B. Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with other federal, state, regional, and
local plans and policies related to air resources and air quality:
•
•
•
24
1797581_2
•
•
SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION
• I. Thresholds/ Permits
A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to solid or hazardous waste
(see 301 CMR 11.03(9))? _Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms:
B. Does the project require any state permits related to solid and hazardous waste? _Yes
• X No; if yes, specify which permit: Note that an Asbestos Abatement Notification will need to be
filed.
C. If you answered "No" to both questions A and B, proceed to the Historical and
Archaeological Resources Section. If you answered "Yes"to either question A or question B. fill
out the remainder of the Solid and Hazardous Waste Section below.
•
II. Impacts and Permits
A. Is there any current or proposed facility at the project site for the storage, treatment,
processing, combustion or disposal of solid waste?_Yes X No; if yes, what is the volume
(in tons per day) of the capacity:
•
Existing Change Total
Storage
Treatment, processing
Combustion
Disposal
• B. Is there any current or proposed facility at the project site for the storage, recycling, treatment
or disposal of hazardous waste?_Yes_X_No; if yes, what is the volume (in tons or gallons per
day) of the capacity:
Existing Change Total
Storage
Recycling
• Treatment
Disposal
C. If the project will generate solid waste (for example, during demolition or construction), describe
alternatives considered for re-use, recycling, and disposal: Demolition and construction debris will
be separated and recycled in accordance with LEED certification.
•
D. If the project involves demolition, do any buildings to be demolished contain asbestos?
Yes_No
E. Describe the project's other solid and hazardous waste impacts (including indirect impacts):
Solid wastes are limited to construction and demolition debris.
• III. Consistency
Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with the State Solid Waste Master
Plan:
II •
25
17975812
•
HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES SECTION
I. Thresholds/Impacts
A. Have you consulted with the Massachusetts Historical Commission? _Yes X No; if yes, •
attach correspondence. For project sites involving lands under water, have you consulted with the
Massachusetts Board of Underwater Archaeological Resources?_Yes_No; if yes, attach
correspondence
B. Is any part of the project site a historic structure, or a structure within a historic district, in either
case listed in the State Register of Historic Places or the Inventory of Historic and Archaeological •
Assets of the Commonwealth? _Yes X No; if yes, does the project involve the demolition of
all or any exterior part of such historic structure? _Yes_ No; if yes, please describe:
C. Is any part of the project site an archaeological site listed in the State Register of Historic Places
or the Inventory of Historic and Archaeological Assets of the Commonwealth? _Yes X No; if
yes, does the project involve the destruction of all or any part of such archaeological site? _Yes
No; if yes, please describe:
D. If you answered "No"to all parts of both questions A, B and C, proceed to the Attachments and
Certifications Sections. If you answered "Yes"to any part of either question A or question B, fill
out the remainder of the Historical and Archaeological Resources Section below.
•
Il. Impacts
Describe and assess the project's impacts, direct and indirect, on listed or inventoried historical and
archaeological resources:
III. Consistency •
Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with federal, state, regional, and local
plans and policies related to preserving historical and archaeological resources:
•
•
•
•
26
1797581_2
•
•
CERTIFICATIONS:
1. The Public Notice of Environmental Review has been/will be published in the following
• newspapers in accordance with 301 CMR 11.15(1):
(Name) Salem Evening News (Date) September 20 2016
2. This form has been circulated to Agencies and Persons in accordance with 301 CMR 11.16(2).
• igna res:
09/14/16
to Signature of lie p sible Officer Date Signature of person preparing
or Proponent NPC (if different from above)
•
John Swansburg Susan St. Pierre
Name (print or type) Name (print or type)
Salem Flatbread, LLC Susan St. Pierre Consulting Services
• Firm/Agency Firm/Agency
258 Andover Street 74 Bay View Ave
Street Street
Georgetown, MA 01833 Salem MA 01970
• Municipality/State/Zip Municipality/State/Zip
781-439-2461
Phone Phone
•
•
•
•
27
•
• Salem Flatbread ENF
o �
io7 / •
{` `{ Project Locus lem x 0'- `J
$ a
ce =; r Hal %►CH k b t
• >,` �{ ire ",. st.,� :.
'yTdFsCT. ste
irr
1
• _ Inter '
Palirner -'"
g • ark .Pickering
Point/
• 4t' /
e
•
Figure 1 Locus Map
•
r4
7W-TrIM
r
_ i i
i
CENTRA
• 51'REE7 ?O[feetoNM
m �e Hw)
�m ._.__._._-'-•--•-.-.____ Not to Scale
n'0
•� m
o �
• En
ro m
F
A 4
T
E E
R
�7 S
T
E
Y Curb Cut
D RB � _
I� trance sidewalk Site En � existing brick
- I 122.91'
-- existing
sidewalk �o asphalt pavement
• I Curb Cut existing brick (�
2 handicap sidewalk
a 2 parking II
_ or spaces c°ncrete ,\-MassDEP PRESUMPTIVE
spaces —existing
/ I
UR SLINE
gg • -'-•_���` � I m (historicc mean mean high water II
naem° .tence _:<�`�_• II %
j I - •-•� tl. / . I (100-feel from
the PL) % I I---
I00-FOOT BUFFER ZONE
CITY OF SALEM _,,,°__ j ' measured from TOCBf
_ _—existing root overhang `•`•`� I _
^, INNER RIPARIAN ZONE
�. existing building
(measured 100-feelfromthe MHW)
BEVERLY jl.l hru LI pr°perry in°
• COOP BANK .I � j LAND AREA =17,763 t Sq. Feet
I,I ° existing NOTE.- ENTIRE SITE IS WITHIN THE f�
C asphalt pavement LANB SUBJECT TO COASTAL'STORM FLOWAGEHA
1 i
j------COMMISSIONERS HESS RETAIL
AUTHORIZATION(h s oftwiwater)0.950 STORES LLC
ON
M V01,
N $ zp _ if
to vide •_..`. 9.2'— — FIGURE 3
ORW4
i EXISTING
/ TOP OF COASTAL 82 wCB) as halt pavementBANK 11 back of e
/ (along eteO face I .� ( O U Z p p r xisting Harborwalk CONDITIONS
(concrete sidewalk)
of the concrete seawall) `ei. Z O conereteARBOR aAkK: I t_
�;,
/ - Rtst! `,l a a �a, ,o �s'caew ..
• MEAN RICH WATER ng cone �' & r
(along the face (6al[ o _T__ _ rxiri�n ailing m O O
/ seaw ret __ - ___ 1 4 Iutlrr'sl
of the granite seawall) granite oo top
hlof existing 8"D 60.6¢ O' Ha-
rborwalk
MEAN LOW WATER k seaw railing PLAN
existin Y- _
(bottom of seawall) all) blockgs granit
awalle eseaward edge �•`
( O T r. of existing Harborwalk FLATBREAD PIZZA and
• v �j R I THE DONUT EXPERIMENT
V E R 311 Derby Street, Salem, MA
R�� 00
N
DERBY m � <
wrorR n �, � �
VARIABLE RJ\�
(PUBLIC
co o
• pp o
(D
0 cu Go
I
pONUT SHOP o I N
1,01B sf
�4 SEA �
C SONAL ���I I J U Q z
.� � MpVABLE C pUTDOOR SEATING J J
PLANTER00
JJ y� �� 1 O
w W _
QQrn � Q w
R i N W
• \ -4- I (2j 3 CUBIC YARD I W ,I
DUMPSTERS& 9
U ENCLOSURE ON �
CONCRETE PAD J� w
W I
Q I
W o'eri pD PIZZA i ; o i� F—
�pTBR RGA v a� o
I 3,384 sf� R sq Y 1 1 < U)
ED EXIST N REMA NAREA
To I
11 LE E ti QOM BAR
J TAP RD I , J SEASONAL f t(1l �i Q
[_
G
ouToo +L� �� ❑ � �� RI
LLIJ�� ®o nn-
2
LL
OOR SEATIN
PrePert
Y
thePra a fence
/ Puyed BO bo�ekerem g)
FIGURE 4 PROPOSED/'SITE PLAN
• % NOT TO SCALE
DATE: 9/12/16
•
Salem Flatbread ENF
•
J)
• 5 T REE T
DER B Y
_r M
,1 ITE
lEnTRArCEi �--�
• TJ �
I yl
1 <I 1
C n
• 1 IT OFFICE ALTERNATIVE I
�a (11 ,000 ± SF)
hi
/ � 1
� -
S Q °P ;,�_ D HARBORWALK _
U T
SER
•
Figure 5 Office Alternative
•
•
Salem Flatbread ENF
I I' T p T. `.1
Project Site [ t
Ix Jyyyyyy L
Excerpt from 1874 Atlasjib }FSI
3yys
y6y36
y3
maxe Sex
N Y]bS
d1N3dOp db>NM
Authorization No. 950
Issued 1886 for Solid Fill On Project Site
.xexM nvXvi a>M� ,a°9Nvl, JtlbM SPIbR9xv'1
•
er ww
ww,
x, mxa
3
r. A I v ..
3 n I
6111'M6 •
Figure 6 Harbor and Land Commissions Authorization No. 950 and 1874 Atlas Excerpt
•
�+r♦ .�.v .t /fix t �• eJ n.. �
ey .,
14,
t �'l ` • • r r
9 4`
4 e ♦f. � ��}jA.( � • 1
{ r' w ♦ � y
J ` • r S �'. •� ` `
F �
J
. e
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Exhibit 1
•
SITE PHOTOS
•
•
Salem Flatbread ENF
Exhibit 1 Site Photos
I •
•
FNM
• - k r- wfi� 4y P
Former Goodyear Tire Looking toward South River from Derby Street
I •
•
i
i
City Walkway toward South River from Derby Street
II •
i
r
Speedway Service Station toward South River from Derby Street
•
•
•
•
II •
•
•
•
•
Exhibit 2
• DISTRIBUTION LIST
•
Salem Flatbread ENF
DISTRIBUTION LIST
• Department of Environmental Protection Mayor Kimberley Driscoll
Commissioner's Office Salem City Hall
One Winter Street 93 Washington Street
Boston, MA 02108 Salem, MA01970
Department of Environmental Protection City Council
Northeast Regional office City Hall
Attn: MEPA Coordinator 93 Washington Street
205B Lowell Street Salem, MA 01970
Wilmington, MA 01887
Planning Board
Massachusetts Department of Transportation City Hall Annex
Public/Private Development Unit 120 Washington Street, 3rd Floor
10 Park Plaza Salem, MA 01970
Boston, MA 02116
Conservation Commission
Massachusetts DOT District Office 84 City Hall Annex
Attn: MEPA Coordinator 120 Washington Street, V Floor
519 Appleton Street Salem, MA
Arlington, MA 02476
Board of Health
Massachusetts Historical Commission City Hall Annex
The MA Archives Building 120 Washington Street,4th Floor
220 Morrissey Boulevard Salem, MA 01970
Boston, MA 02125
Metropolitan Area Planning Council
60 Temple Place/6th floor
Boston, MA 02111
Department of Environmental Protection
Waterways Program
One Winter Street, 6" Floor
Boston, MA 02108
Office of Coastal Zone Management
Attn: Project Review Coordinator
251 Causeway Street, Suite 800
Boston, MA 02114
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Exhibit 3
• REQUIRED PERMITS
•
•
The following table lists the federal, state and local permits required by the Project.
Agency Permit/Approval
City of Salem
• Conservation Commission Order of Conditions
Planning Board Special Permit
Building Department Building Permit
Licensing Board Liquor License
State
Mass Department of Chapter 91 License
• Environmental Protection,
Waterways Program -
Federal
N/A N/A
•
•
•
•
•
•