1-3 COLBY STREET - ZONING (2) Colby st.::hilhcare Facility'
S
I
� J
U'
1 � ��
� ..
A�
J � \ \\
\\ \
`' �
��
1�
\\ \�
_i,_
O'
,1
�.cONDI CtV of kyr a era, fflassar4norit Nnr
s ,
aIttxarixcnttrD
30 Pt]
;F
M ��q
�J'>talkwe M�`"t Mm $alem Green
�S
DECISION
SPECIAL PERMIT
WETLANDS AND FLOOD HAZARD SPECIAL PERMIT
1-3 COLBY STREET
SALEM, MA 01970
RE: 1-3 COLBY STREET
On Thursday, December 17, 1992 , the Planning Board of the City
of Salem held a public hearing regarding the application of Salem
Hospital for a Special Permit under Section 7-16, Wetlands and
Flood Hazard Districts of the Salem Zoning Ordinance, with respect
to the construction of an 125 ft . x 48 ft . building for a childcare
facility and associated work within a Resource Area and Buffer Zone
at 1-3 Colby Street .
At a regular meeting of the Planning Board held on Thursday,
April. 7 , 1994, the Board voted by a vote of seven (7 ) in favor ,
none opposed, to approve the application as complying with the
requirements of a Special Permit, subject to conditions .
1 . CONFORMANCE WITH PLAN
Work shall conform to the plan entitled "Site Plan of
Land in Salem, Mass" prepared by Scholfield Brothers,
Inc . , date March 12, 1992 revised through April 29, 1994 .
2 . DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Work shall conform with all requirements of a Superseding
Order of Conditions issued by the Department ;. of
Environmental Protection on December 31, 1993 - DEP file
#64-202 .
3 . BOARD OF HEALTH
Board of Health requirements set forth in a letter dated
January 13, 1993 , shall be strictly adhered to.
4 . CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES
All construction shall be conducted in accordance with
the following conditions :
a . No work shall commence before 8: 00 a.m. on weekdays
and 8 : 00 a.m. on Saturdays. No work shall continue
beyond 5: 00 p.m. There shall be no work conducted on
Sundays or holidays. Inside work of a quiet nature may
be permitted at other times .
b. All reasonable action shall be taken to minimize the
negative effects of construction on abutters Advance
notice shall be provided to all abutters in writing at
least 72 hours prior to commencement of construction.
C. All construction vehicles shall be cleaned prior to
leaving the site so that they do not leave dirt and/or
debris on roadways as they leave the site.
d. All construction shall be performed in accordance
with the applicable Rules and Regulations of the Planning
Board, and in accordance with any and all applicable
rules, regulations and ordinances of the City of Salem.
5 . LANDSCAPING
a. After all project landscaping is completed, and prior
to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the
developer will be required to add further landscaping on
the site if such is required by the Planning Board or
City Planner .
b. Maintenance of all landscaping shall be the
responsibility of the developer , his successors or
assigns .
C. The children ' s play area shall be screened and
landscaped in such a manner as to buffer the sound of the
play area from nearby abutters. The applicant must
comply with all applicable local, state or federal
regulations regarding screening material.
6 . TESTING OF MATERIALS
A geotechnical testing company, approved in writing by
the Planning Department, shall conduct random testing for
hazardous material at the direction of the Clerk of the
Works, of soils excavated at the site. This testing
shall be funded by the applicant . The results of vthe
tests must be submitted to the Planning Department and
the Board of Health as may be required by the Planning
Department .
7 . WATER QUALITY TESTS
The applicant stiall submit to the Planning Board and the
Board of Health pre- and post-construction water quality
tests . Post-construction water quality tests shall be
conducted by the applicant, annually for three years. If
post-construction water quality tests standards deviate
from pre-construction water quality test, the applicant
is required to determine the action necessary for the
City to return the water quality to standards
satisfactory to the Board.
8 . STORM WATER PEAK FLOW
The discharge of water from the pond from the existing
elevation 78, Salem City base, shall take place,
following the completion and the utilization of the new
drainage system on Greenway Road, at a time when there is
a period of little or no rain and at a rate of discharge
predetermined and approved in writing by the Director of
Public Services to eliminate the magnitude of water surge
downstream. Written notification of the proposed
discharge time must be submitted to the Director of
Public Services, the Planning Department and the three
Designated Representatives of abutters within 48 hours
prior to the discharge of water . The City of Salem' s
Clerk of the Works shall be maintained on site to view
the release of water until the pond has reached its
ultimate level .
9 . UTILITIES
Utility installation shall be reviewed and approved by
the Director of Public Services.
10 . LIGHTING
All exterior lighting shall be installed and maintained
in such a way so as not to reflect or cause glare on
abutting or facing residential premises, or which
adversely affect safe vision of operators of vehicles
moving on nearby street. Lighting shall be reviewed and
approved by the City Planner prior to issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy.
11 . SIGNAGE
a. Signage for the building shall be reviewed ;and
approved by the City Planner prior to issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy.
b. Free standing signage and . pavement markings,
directing pedestrians to the childcare facility, shall be
reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the
issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
12 . MAINTENANCE method or
a. The applicant must employ an acceptable
means for the holding and disposal of trash ( rubbish)
after site development with a copy of this method sent to
the Planning Department and Health Department in writing
for their approval prior to the issuance of a Certificate
of Occupancy.
b. Refuse removal, ground maintenance and snow removal
shall be the responsibility of the developer , his
successors or assigns.
13 . EMPLOYEE PARKING
Y.- Parking of employees of the childcare facility shall
be monitored for a period of sixty days after operation
of the childcare facility begins and substantial
enrollment (75 students) at the center has been obtained,
with a view toward determining employee parking patterns
and whether or not spaces set aside for employees are in
fact inadequate. The applicant will keep a daily log
during the sixty day period. The Planning Department
will review with on site supervision during the peak
hours to verify the parking lot capacity. At the end of
the sixty day period the applicant will meet with the
Planning Board to determine if any changes in employee
parking patterns is required.
b. The Planning Board in its discretion may require as
a condition of this Special Permit that employees of the
childcare facility shall park at Salem Hospital at 81
Highland Avenue and be shuttled to the childcare facility
located at 1-3 Colby Street . In this event, no employee
shall be allowed to park at the childcare facility
exclusive of any handicapped employees. Alternatively,
the Planning Board may determine that employee parking
shall be permitted at the facility. In this event , all
employee parking exclusive of handicapped employee
parking shall be restricted to the western end of the
parking lot and this restriction will be indicated on the
plan.
14 . ENROLLMENT AT CHILDCARE FACILITY
Enrollment at the childcare facility shall not exceed 100
students at any time.
15 . NEW DRAINAGE SYSTEM
Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the
applicant must receive written approval from the
Department of Public Services that the new drainage
system on, Greenway Road and the drainage system of the
childcare facility are functioning properly.
16 . NEW GREENWAY ROAD DRAINAGE SYSTEM
The City of Salem has agreed to design and construct a
new drainage system on Greenway Road. The applicant will
provide $15,000 to the Planning Board to utilize for this
drainage system. These funds will be utilized as the
Board deems necessary to assist in designing the
improvements to the existing drainage system.
17 . CONSERVATION AREA
The applicant shall, upon issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy, meet with City of Salem officials in the
Planning Department , Engineering Department and
Conservation Commission to determine the most appropriate
way to transfer control of the pond area as defined on
plan. It is the intent of this condition that the area
of the pond, a walking area around the entire pond, and
the area north of the parking lot to the property line on
Colby Street be reserved for conservation purposes and
that the areas not be built upon.
18 . AMENDMENTS
Any amendments to the site plan shall require the
approval of a majority of the Planning Board.
19 . VIOLATIONS
Violations of any condition shall result in the
revocation of this approval by the Planning Board.
20 . CITY PLANNER AND CITY ENGINEER APPROVAL
The City Engineer and the City Planner shall provide
written approval that the Plan entitled "Site Plan of
Land in Salem, Mass" revised April 29, 1994 meets the
requirements of this Decision.
This Special Permit shall not take effect until a copy of the
decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that twenty
days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed or that if such
appeal has been filed, and it has been dismissed or denied, is
recorded in the Essex County Registry of Deeds and is indexed in
the grantor index under the name of the owner of record or is
recorded and noted on the owner ' s certificate of title. The fee
for recording or registering shall be paid by the owner or
applicant .
Walter B. Power , II
Chairman
EX\DH\COLBYST.COND
(l /by 3tcee,-/ - Cue s
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Environmental Affairs
Department of
r Environmental Protection JAN 0 4 1994
F
William F. Weld
Gm F. rtti:3e18 �S: ia:e278� Dept.
Daniel S.Greenbaum
Canmlobrrr
DEC 31 ;c-0'7
In the Matter of:
SALEM HOSPITAL Docket No. 92-162
File No. 64-202
Salem
FINAL DECISION
This case arises under the Wetlands Protection Act,
G.L. c. 131, sec. 40. The Department of Environmental Protection
("department") issued Salem Hospital ("applicant") a Superseding
Order of Conditions. It allows construction of a day care
building, outdoor play area and parking lot within the hundred
foot buffer zone of a bordering vegetated wetland. It also
allows the installation of a drainage pipe and rip rap on the
bank of a pond. The Petitioners are an abutter, 100 Highland
Avenue Trust, and a group of nearby residents. Dr. Patrick
Curtin represents both petitioners. On November 30, 1993 , at the
start of the adjudicatory hearing, I ruled that the applicant and
the department were entitled to summary decision on all the .
issues in this case. This final decision explains, memorializes
and implements that ruling.
ANALYSIS
A month before the hearing, the parties filed their direct
testimony in writing, under 310 CMR 1. 01 (8) (f) , and motions for
One Winter Street • Boston,Massachusetts 02108 • FAX(617) 556.1049 • Telephone(617)292-5500
summary decision under 310 CMR 1. 01 (7) (f) . As I had directed,
the parties used the same set of documents to both support their
motions for summary decision and serve as their pre-filed direct
testimony. The Department's witness and the Applicant's two
witnesses provided expert opinions on the two issues in the case.
All three said that the project as conditioned meets the
performance standards of the wetlands Regulations. Additionally,
they all said that the proposed twenty-four inch drainage pipe--
to be installed outside of any resource area or buffer zone--
would be adequate to carry storm water runoff from the project
site. After considering these documents, I concluded that they
were evidence of the type admissible in Massachusetts courts.'
Additionally, after reviewing the entire record, I concluded
that the documents, unless successfully challenged, would
eliminate the remaining issues. Thus, unless the petitioners
could show the existence of a genuine issue of material fact the
motions for summary decision would have to be granted.
The only evidence in the record that possibly raises a
genuine issues of material fact is a letter submitted by the
petitioners as the pre-filed direct testimony of their eleventh
witness2. The letter is signed by a graduate student in
'The testimony is offered subject to the penalties of perjury.
Additionally, the witnesses are competent to offer expert opinions
on the issues in this case.
2The pre-filed direct testimony (with attachments) of ten
residents and owners of property near the site submitted by the
petitioners do not raise genuine issues of material fact. Some of
the testimony does not bear on the remaining issues in the case.
The rest is opinion testimony of lay witnesses and is not
admissible in Massachusetts courts.
3
environmental science and is addressed to the petitioners'
representative. It says "This proposed project would further
degrade water quality in the pond, diminish existing wetlands and
their functional values. . . " . The letter has shortcomings3. For
purposes of this decision, the most important shortcoming is that
it was not written subject to the penalties of perjury.
Testimonial evidence offered to support or oppose a motion for
summary decision must be given subject to the penalties of
perjury.4 Had this rule been applied strictly in this case, the
contents of the letter would not have been considered and the
department's and the applicant's motions for summary decision
would have been granted before the hearing.
However, in this case, the rule was not applied. This is
because the letter from the graduate student was submitted for
two purposes. It was part of petitioners' opposition to the
department's and applicant's motions for summary decision and it
was the pre-filed direct testimony of. one of the petitioners'
witnesses. In the past, parties have submitted pre-filed
testimony that was not given subject to the penalties of perjury.
These parties read the controlling regulation, 310 CMR
3The letter does not establish that the author possesses the
qualifications or familiarity with the site and the project that
would allow his opinion to be accepted as evidence and considered
in ruling on a summary decision motion.
'Testimony is usually presented in affidavits and it may also
be presented at a hearing on a motion for summary decision. In
this case, none of the parties asked for a hearing.
4
1. 01 (8) (f) 5, as allowing a witness to wait until adopting his or
her pre-filed testimony at hearing to acknowledge that the
testimony is given under the penalties of perjury. The
consequences of this error have usually not been severe.
Witnesses have been allowed in some circumstances to correct the
error and acknowledge for the first time at the hearing that
their pre-filed testimony is given subject to the penalties of
perjury. In this case I had directed the parties to file only
one set of documents that would serve as both evidence to support
and oppose the summary decision motions and as pre-filed direct
testimony. I required the parties to use one set of documents
for two different purposes. Petitioners' representative, who is
not a lawyer, might well have determined that he could wait until
the hearing to have his witness both adopt his pre-filed
testimony and acknowledge that it was given under the penalties
of perjury. Under these circumstances, the fairest approach was
5Prefiled Direct Testimony.
The agency or Presiding officer may, on its own motion
or on motion of any Party, order all Parties to file
within a reasonable time in advance of the hearing on the
merits the full written text of the testimony of their
witnesses on direct examination, including exhibits to be
offered in evidence. The Agency or presiding Officer may
also require the filing of written rebuttal testimony
within a reasonable time after the filing of direct
testimony as described in the preceding sentence. All
testimony filed pursuant to this rule shall be subject to
the penalties of perjury. All witnesses whose testimony
is filed pursuant to this rule shall appear at the
hearing on the merits and be available for cross-
examination.. If a witness is not available for cross-
examination at the hearing on the merits, the written
testimony of said witness shall be excluded from the
record unless the Parties agree otherwise.
5
to put off ruling on the department's and applicant's motions for
summary decision until the hearing on the merits, where the
graduate student could acknowledge that his testimony was given
under the penalties of perjury.
At the start of the hearing, I asked petitioners (who had
the burden of going forward) if the graduate student was
available. Petitioners' representative said that the student
told him he was taking an examination and would try to come to
the hearing later. The department and the applicant renewed
their motions to dismiss and stated their objection to any
further delay. I determined that fairness now required that the
applicant's and the department's motions for summary decision be
granted forthwith. Accordingly, I announced that the motions
were granted and there was no reason for the hearing to go
forward.
RULING
There are no genuine issues of material fact and the
department and the applicant are entitled to a decision in their
favor as a matter of law. Accordingly, the department's and the
applicant's motions for summary decision are GRANTED.
ORDER
Petitioners' claim for an adjudicatory hearing is DISMISSED.
The project may go forward in accordance with the attached Final
Order of Conditions.
REQUESTS FOR RECONSIDERATION AND RIGHT TO APPEAL TO COURT
The parties have the right to move for reconsideration
6
under 310 CMR 1. 01(10) (p) , by filing a motion with the Docket
Clerk and served on all other parties within ten calendar days of
the postmark date of this decision. The party must state the
factual grounds and legal provisions it relies on to support its
motion. The parties may appeal this decision to Superior Court,
under G.L. c. 30A, sec. 14 (1) . The complaint must be filed in
the Court within thirty days of receipt of this decision.
FRANCIS X. NEE
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE
I adopt this Decision as my Final Decision.
- - / -`V--------------------
DANIEL S. GREENBAUM
COMMISSIONER
310 CHR 10.99 Der File No. 64-202
(To be pewided by DEP)
Form S
Gry/raoa SALEM.
Applicant SALEM HOSPTTAL
Coa®axvea2 th
of Massachusetts FINAL
order of Conditions
Massachuetts Wetlands Protection Act
G.L. c. 131, 540
From department of Environmental Protection Issuing Authority
To QATFM uncPTTAT (DONALD DIPANFILO) SAME
(Name of Applicant) (Name of property owner)
Address 81 HIGHLAND AVE, SALEM, MA Address
This order is issued and delivered as follows:
❑ by hand delivery to applicant or representative on (date)
❑ by certified mail, return receipt requested on (date)
This project is located at 70 An MTRV CT AQCF440R*C MAP 1L TOT 128 tvn t46,&cl"
The property is recorded at the Registry of SOUTH ESSEX
Book 8361 page 212
Certificate (i£ registered)
The Notice of intent for this project was filed on 1/14/9 (date)
The public hearing was closed on May 14 1992 (date)
Findings
The nop�.rmn..r has reviewed the above-referenced Notice of intent and plans and has
held a public hearing on the project.. Based on the information available to then 22 rrmant at this
time, the no..�r...,o..r has determined that the area on which the proposed work is to be done is
significant to the following interests in accordance with the Presunptions of Significance set forth in the
regulations for each Area subject to Protection Under the Act (check as appropriate):
Public water supply Flood Control Lend containing shellfish
Private water supply Storm damage prevention Fisheries
6d Ground water supply Prevention of pollution Protection of Wildlife Habitat
Total Filing Fee Submitted1:525.00 State Share
(1/2 fee in excess of S25)
City/Town Share
Total Refund Due S City/Town Portion S State Portions
0/2 total) (1/2 total)
Effective 11/10/89 5-1
Therefore. me Depaz-zmenc
hereby fines mat the following cpnyitions are
necessary, in a=orcar_e with the Performance Slanearci set form in the regulations, to prole✓:mose imer.
este cre nec above.The De?a^ee-L oroers mat all work snail be oenonneC
in aC:DrCance with said I cnC:ttcns ane with the Notice of Intent reterencee above.To the extent that ire tot•
lowing cbncitions mocity or adler from ine Clans,soecihcailons.or other proDosals suDrnined with:ne Nolt=e
of Intent,the Conditions snail Contral.
General Conditions
t. Fauure to comply with all conditions stater herein, and with all relater statutes and other regulatory meas•
urea,snail be deemed cause to revoke or modify this Order.
Z. This Order noes not grant any D.ODerrrights or any exclusive privileges:it does not authorize any injury
to Dnvale Dfocerty or invasion of private rights.
This Order does not relieve the Dermimee or anv other Derson of the necessity of comolying with all
Other a=nh=aole fecera!,state or to=statutes, ordinances.by-saws or regulations.
A. The work authorized hereunder snail be comoleted within three years tram the date bf this Oreer unless
either of the tollowinn zbply:
(a) The work is a maintenance dredging project as Drovicer for in me A^or
(b) the time for comCietion has been extenoec to a specifier Cale more man three years. out less than
five years,from.,the Cate of issuance am both mat Cate and the spe=:at C:,umstan=es want-tin;
the exlenaed time oenoc are se:Torn in this Orae:.
�. This Order may be extended by the issuing authority for one or more Cannes of up tC three years each
upon aDDliCation to the issuing autnoriry at leas:30 cat's one. to the exvirmion Cale of me Orce...
5. Any tiff used in connection with this nroiec:snail be clean fill, coriminin-p no Zs,-., refuse. .uzzisn or de•
b is. inclucinz but not limited to lumoet, orcxs, ptaster, wire. la^, parer, addca=. C:De, tures. zsnes.
retnge.'2:ers.motor vehicles C.-pars bf any of the tcrepoin^y..
T. No worx snail be urcertaken until all acministtative appeal Clarions from this Order have elansec o:, if -
sudn an z=neaf has been filed, until all DroCee°dtngs DeTore me Dena-hent rave been co^oleleC.
E. No won:snail be uncenaken until the Fina!Order has been recorded in the negls:ry o: Deeds or the Lahr
C our,,C.'the d:S.=f in which the land is fogatec,within the Chain of tine bf fie amectec Crccem'. In me
case Of recorder land, the Final Orcer s-ali also be noted in the nemstry's Grantor lnoex under the name
C'.the owner of the land unen whi=n the DrcnoseC won(is to be done. in me case of reamteren lanc. :ne
Fi-21 Omer mals 2s-De note= on the L.znc:our Certifiate b:Tolle of me owner v:ne :arc voon wn:=-
:ne Drcccseo worn,m to be Cone. The recce.emr inlc^anonsmall be su�mimec:g:fie Dena==tee-:
on the to=a:the en= of t-:s Order onor in commencement of The wary_
S. A sign snail be ms=laved at the site no: less than two souare feet or more than three souare fee: in see
bean;the wares, 'Iras:sa=nuse^.s DeDamInenf o: cnvirunmeraal "rotecvcn,
File Number a4_en^
1 0.
Where me Dena^men: of Environmemal ?rote:ton is reduesteC to make 2 determination and to issue
a Suoersedino Oroe-, the Conservation Commission snail be a carry to all aoency proceedings and
hearings before the Deoanmen:.
1
1. Unon Commetion of the work oescnbeC herein, me aDDlicarf:snalf Ic.^.nwim recues:in writing ma:2
Certificate of Corrinfiance oe issuer stating that the worst nas been sanstaQonty comyeleC.
:2. Tne worY.snail conform to the following plans anc soecial conditions:
5.2
Plans:
Tii(e Dzfed Signed and Stamoed 175•: On Fite wdr..:
PLEASE SEE ATTACHED
Soecial Conditions(use.aoditional oaoer If necessary).
PLEASE SEE ATTACHED -
............._...................................__..»..»........_._...._..._._......_._...._.._......................................................
(Leave Snaze Bmnk)
5.—B
DEP FILE »64-202
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
12. The work shall conform to the following plans, documents and
special conditions, except as they may be modified elsewhere
in this order and\or by the later-dated plans, etc. referenced
below in this condition;
The March 13 , 1992 (postmark) project notice of intent,
attachments and accompanying documents, including the project
plan, three sheets, "Site Plan of Land In Salem, Mass. " ,
stamped by Bruce L. Ey on March 12 , 1992, and Attachment 1,
"Stormwater Runoff, Drainage Design and Wetlands Assessment
for the Proposed Day Care Facility at Colby Street, Salem,
MA, " dated March 12, 1992 by Schofield Brothers, Inc. ;
the above attachment as it is revised by "Revised
Drainage and Stormwater Runoff Computations for proposed
Alternative Layout Three, " stamped by Bruce L. Ey on September
23 , 1992 ; and
the above "plan" , as revised through to October 31, 2.992
and signed by Bruce L. Ey on October 30, 1992, said revisions
indicating that all catchbasin flow will be directed to the
existing 24" pipe headwall (said headwall to be modified as
described) behind 100 Highland Avenue, and approximately 6, 500
sa. feet of the described "playground area" to be added to the
pond' s watershed.
13 . No work shall commence on-site until all appeal periods have
elapsed and this Superseding Order of Conditions has been
recorded with the registry of deeds and the Department
formally notified via the form provided at the end of this
order.
14 . Any change (s) made in the plans, etc. referenced in
condition 12 which will alter an Area Subject to
Protection Under the Wetlands Protection Act, or any
change(s) in activity subject to regulation under M.G.L.
Chapter 131, Section 40, shall recruire the applicant to
inquire of the Department, in writing, as to whether the
change(s) is significant enough to require the filing of
a new notice of intent. A copy of said request shall at
the same time be sent to the Conservation Commission.
15. The applicant shall notify the Department and the
Conservation Commission in writing, 48 hours before any
further or new activity commences on site.
16. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to maintain
all trash racks, pipes, sumps, etc. on the property in
reasonable condition, so as not to cause water quality or
quantity effects.
17. Any material excavated or otherwise uncovered during
construction of this project which is or appears to be
hazardous material as defined in MGL Ch. 21E shall immediately
be, in writing, brought to the attention of the Department and
the Salem Conservation Commission.
18. The site as identified in the project plans shall be
maintained in a clean and orderly condition. Refuse, debris
and waste materials shall not be placed within any resource
area under any circumstance, and shall be disposed of promptly
and properly. All construction refuse, debris and waste
materials shall be removed from the site upon completion of
the construction activities.
19. Upon completion of the project and prior to or with any
request for a Certificate of Compliance, an As-Buil- plan
shall be submitted for the Department' s approval.
20. Equipment shall be stored in a manner and location which will
minimize potential environmental impacts. Fuel storage and the
refueling of vehicles shall be conducted outside of the buffer
zone in an upland location at a horizontal distance greater
than 100 feet from the boundaries of the wetlands .
21. This Order of Conditions supersedes all prior orders
under DEP File r64-202.
22. This order applies only to those activities described in
the notice of intent for DEP file ;64-202 and may not be
construed as approving any other activities which could
affect an interest subject to the jurisdiction of the
Wetlands Protection Act.
23 . Members and agents of the Conservation Commission and the.
Department shall have the right to enter and inspect the
premises to evaluate compliance with conditions stated in
this Superseding Order. The applicant shall submit any
data the Department deems necessary for that evaluation.
24. This Order shall apply to all successors or assigns in
interest or control and any other party engaging in activity
on the property identified in the Notice of Intent.
25. A copy of this Superseding Order of Conditions, as well as the
plans referenced in condition 12, shall be on site and shall
remain there while activities regulated by this Order are
being performed. The copies of said documents shall be
accessible to all contractors and subcontractors.
26. The attached cover letter is hereby and severally made a part
of this order of conditions, and shall be recorded at the
Registry of Deeds together with that order.
27. The work shall not be considered to be in conformity with
requirements of Special Condition No. 12 until such time as
the existing drainage system located on the adjacent property
at 100 Highland Avenue is connected by means of, at a minimum,
a twenty-four (24) inch diameter pipe, to the State drainage
system in Highland Avenue, or an alternative drainage system
constructed by the City of Salem.
FINDINGS PURSUANT TO M. G. L. CHAPTER 30,
SECTION 61 TO 62H INCLUSIVE
(M.E.P.A. )
The project as described in the Notice of Intent for DEP File
#64-202 is "categorically exempt" pursuant to the implementation of
the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act as adopted by the
Secretary of Environmental Affairs. This project is "categorically
exempt" as the Wetlands thresholds established under 301 CMR
11.26 (7) (a) of M.G.L. Ch. 30, sec. 61 to 628 inclusive, have not
been exceeded.
This finding is applicable only to activities proposed for the
above referenced file number before the Department of Environmental
Protection, Wetlands Division. It does not relieve the applicant
from complying with additional M.E.P.A. requirements when applying
for permits from other applicable departments or agencies.
issued by the Department 01 Envirocyp 1 Protection
signature q
on this � )S day of CO/711�o✓ _19 f
before me personally appeared �/r011 e G cernbaUK to me known to be
the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and
acknowledged that he/she executed the same as his/her free act and deed.
1( )4
Notary Public My commission expires
and submit to the rior to conmencement of work.
Detach on dotted lira o
............................................................................................................
issuing Authority.
To
Please be advised that the order of Conditions for the project at
file Ner has been recorded at the Registry of and
udb
has been noted in the chain of title of the affected property in accordance with General Condition 8 on
19
if recorded land, the inatrueent nwaber which identifies this transaction is
if registered lend, the docunent nwnber which identifies this'transaction is -
Applicant
Signature
5-4B
SERVICE LIST 92-162
John Darling, Esq. representing applicant
Serafini, Serafini & Darling
63 Federal Street
Salem MA 01970
Dr. Patrick H. Curtin petitioner
100 Highland Avenue
Salem MA 01970
100 Highland Avenue Condominium Trust
100 Highland Avenue
Salem MA 01970
Salem Conservation Commission
One Salem Green
Salem MA 01970
Vinca Jarrett representing DEP
Assistant General Counsel
Office of the General Counsel
Department of Environmental Protection
One Winter Street
Boston, MA 02108
Mr. Ralph Perkins DEP staff
Northeast Regional Office
Department of Environmental Protection
10 Commerce Way
Woburn MA 01801
I
I
f' B6 .q
� eg cF�
• \ 88 x6
/. \ . • \ � �� ,off �
• . /
� /• •/ •. \
' • � II 1 . 13 �
0
L= 95.051000 0�
92x0 /
• S
�.
• • :V`1 - 80x91 \ •� `. \
° A6
°6
74x4
/ ,� -
STREET �F 6� / / -� • ' \ 87x°
z EDA • • = N, o •
ALM M -=- -- � �
ti° _ -
. \ q3 //
•• • •• WA MEN? •/ ��Ia° 2g� �� � `� • • • 30
� ••OF •• -� �•• nD /! ���� �•,�\ `��� LOCATED \� •� / g60 1,
76x5 EDGE •' ��•0 R = 319.21 _
` Q • •� 8
l000
L- 103.04 / _ N \ 8
•
59.93 •• /
EXISTING SUMP TO BE BACKFILLED IN 8" LIFTS 1 1 II ` • •� / ``\O 9/ • •\
10 • • • i
WITH CLEAN GRAVEL BORROW AND COMPACTED I • )4' I 3O W PROP. DMH 8 / �� _ •
' $ / / ` •\
TO 95 i• OF MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY AND PAVED I FG= \RIM = 80.2 # /
WITH 3" OF BITUMINOUS CONCRETE . �t�iV.= 75.3 / WATER ELEVATION (OUTLET PIPE BLOCKED) \\ ___ \ -
' 0 x 8 / TAKEN 12 19/91 , ELEV.= 79.8 BY SCHOFIELD BROTHERS , INC. � '- - •\ 85 x 4
I l • 79x1 _� / TAKEN 9 /90 , ELEV.= 78.5 BY ATLANTIC ENGINEERING AND SURVEY CONSULTANTS ____ \ • •\
PROP. DMH 4 (WITH BEEHIVE / 1
INLET GRATE : PROPOSED CHAIN / 1 -' �\ ��� \ • • \ ��\
i \ �\ ` •
' RIM = 72.2 \ LINK FENCE o A5 /
INV.= 69.71 (12") • x FG-80.8 z A6 / ' J`� • F
/ r
HEADWALL TO BE REMOVED INV. = 69.46 (15") - o - �....
BENCHMARK = - ¢ `
�'' WETLA ION �,� •\
CHISELED SQUARE ON TOP c\�. D DELINEAT I \ . • \
OF CONCRETE HEADWALL . PROPOSEDNC.
�; 80�t 2 BY W.P.I.WP•I
' ELEVATION = 73 .74 .E OPEN
o I�: _ 9/21/90 !' � � - \� ��\ •.
PLAY YARD FG= 80.5 EDGE OF SPREADING PHRAGMiTES (GIANT REED) � �\ �\ ••\
x I AS OF 12/91 DUE TO ELEVATED POND LEVEL
# 5 ��;; xFG=80.8 O I RESULTING FROM BLOCKED POND OUTLET /ice � ` �\ \\ '•
Ua O 78x9 I / � \ 1 •
I _ w v I ____L--PROP. DMH # 7
JI�V„ PROP. CB # 4 co _ 1
-6�6' IM = 72.4 PROPOSED 6' tY.........
•"• A8 ,cA9 RIM - 80.8 / A22 \ 1 �\
F 2 RCP = Q �i / 6"' INV.= 74.83 �� -- _d... .._ ��---------- \ I �
' I
INV.- 68.8 HIGH STOCKADE A7 " - 23
�� �, FENCE ALONG .i z I 8"' INV._,76.6 EXISTING PIPE / - -----
I I 81 " INV.- '74.67 / A2%tr � A24 ``.� �\ (V.
m m , AREA TO BE PAVED PROPERTY LINE I t I / - -- _ - ' 86 x 8
m 1.2 INV.= 74.30 i, _ a" •
\ CO
_ / / EXISTING 8" OUTLET PIPE IS TO BE AZ5 1
�� � 4� SHED SHED 76x8 r 1 xFG=80.8 I / / REPLACED WITH 8"SCH.40 PVC. /�20 �.�y�\ 1 1 •
1 PORTION OF ` 80 x 9
I \ -
74 STONE
I n II ti II �- �a WALL �X.I TING PIPE 30" // EXISTING 8" PIPE INLET •
D
n ? o .:; . I• 11 - TO REMOVED WILLOW �I INV.-78.(0 ��-�\ / ,`i 6,,. ASH / \ X26 \ i •
tL o i EXIST. _
o RCP 44 37 25 W -- *-- D g_ Ac _ ° / ��/ °
' 15
aa.oc a c`w o ( 12" RE-P- IVJ.981EXIS • AT r .4t '/o --- -•-------- ----D -- ------ PROPOSED HEADWALL # 1 �� � \ ---
\ •
% ?6 ��.�� • �. '\ INVERT = 78.0 EXIST. , -
-w Y 1 8,13"MARLE TO REMAI _ END • _-_--_ -
••,� � � / / ;; � 15 LOCUST � , •
�nc� �i 12 TWIN MAP�,E, INV.-75.82 • o .♦ - - .� ��- // \.,,/ \ ` -__-' •
un to X o a QO r ; pA�C� �� `�` ��� -- - - A14 �� �� �\ A(9
t 203M ww p 80 POND - A15
gCAL
on > 11 11 ° II F - TP#2 -5 •. TP#4 FG 90.6 . �� Al2 _ -� A 2\\` _- ALB,' � NOTE: pj
z G 80.6 •• �s9j• = 0 8 FG-83.0 84 ��! O \ - / 3 9'�CHERRY MULTI STEM APPROXIMATE WETLAND DISTRICT BUFFER ZONE
x FG 8 /91 . O /
0/ MULTI
o WILLOW AS SCALED FROM MAPS ENTITLED WETLAND R
76 W 1 • • _ � _ ��_� " AREAS
J
a N N 0 PROPOSED BUILDING • • • • • • • • !82 RAMP �0 ° �_ -�� OF SALEM MASSACHUSETTS" # 14 PREPARED BY: o
,• �h CC DR. JEROME LONG , DATED MARCH 15, 1977 .
` 1- N 00 t 1 CONC. WALK 6 • 8
_ 0 W 0 ttj � TP#1 ( 125 x 48 ) o o h �� tK �' •�. F '85,8 x cD J �
° 0>O ` N�� .�O .0� E GE OF DNC. ALK • r - °� 86 x 4
w 00 � / SLAB ELEV. = 81 .0 ��c,� �C� 9 F RMS 6" CURB • a E-
M 0 Q D ` pw�'G' + �° 22 ; A TED�TO ENTRANCE PROPOSED PRECAST SPRUCE /-•�� • •' • -
�, w w Cn TOP OF FOUNDATION WALL = 82.0 G P� �`� 9� .oG 1" - "� / PAVEMENT PIN -�- - a F 15 • • \
= N P c.0 0, TY P. co �--- M IDEWALK FLUS • \] •
a ^ z 10' TP#3 O _PROP. CB # 1 ;TO ENTRANCE TP#5 A - CONCRETE(TYPICAL)CURSING K'4yl- TH PAVEMENT • • • • •
n Q_ CO �k. RIM = 80.5 / B _� •' �- • •
0 1t it �� ~' , - � � ��Q-1 � INV.= 7.5 / � 9, a �. ��SPRUCE • �/ • • • -
> t1� 10 G=80.6
a • �- / 0 12 SPR •• \ • •
a ? �� FG=81.0 x 1 ���. / • �4R. A �' ,/ �_ \ . • •
8
78 80 -
'�"-'- 1 PROP. DMH # 2 SIDEWALK FLUSH ����' •�\ +� •• 0� / *•• • •• •• \� 13, 6" CHERRY- • • • -� --- •
r` • (3)6 HACKBERRY _� / \ _ • - ,
150' ± �5 RCp - RIM= 79.0 WITH PAVEMENT F� ROP. ECA CONC. CURB YIP • • •• • • �- _ 5 .4 -
- /QT D S 12 INV.=75.3 15 MV.=75.0 % • •
TO HIGHLAND - Exis NG LIGHT LE TO- " 84 ° ' • r --� 43°3313711E x • • x ' • • -' - - •
• � S 43° 55' X911 E
AVE. 4. Vow SIDEWALK 20 5 4-.66 12-RCP • -�L.26 /o • 3 / - `7c
�- -
5 WIDE 12 RCP AT 2.22 /° EMOVED p 74
• D x FG 85 10 R� 5� �WIDE CONCRETE /SIDEWALK
o . D o . . o p o A. o D 1 oF?A. oEP P FP o FP 0 / FP o P xG.=85. o PA. FG=86. o !, FP o opA. •
-3--EXISTING CB#3 PROPOSED GRANITE CURBING 80x7 PROPOSED /GRANITE / CURBIN FP ° oFP
f EXISTING CURB TO BE / \ PROP DMH # I ` 12 RCPT \ , ! 6 TRANSITION TO GRADE, PROPOSED GRANITI=\ CURBING \ / 3� WIDE •
PROP. BUILDING SEWER RIM;,T8.3 �� ,/ 1 / 3_WIDE GRASS _ / °° / BOTH SIDES OF SIDEWALK-
REMOVED RIM =85.2` AT-1.2 / 5 WIDE/OONC.SIDEWALK `i /
- SEXIST: INV.=76.3 -3 WIDE GRASS STRIP f 6 TRA S ON 83x0 STRIP -� GRASS STRI •
78 x 9 O L B Y TO GR DE, TH SIDES (2)-12 INV.=81.3 84 x 8 85 x 8 'L� 86 x 8 • 85 x I
79 x 2 S 79x6 OF S DE K- GRANITE CURIBING TO EDGE OF S .� STREET s 88x4 ....
„ SLOPE = 1.71% S S PUBLIC WAY.. S 9 GRANITE CURBING TO EDGE -
EXISTING 8 PVC STUB--� 0 SMH RIM =86.62
EXISTING
(TOIBE CONNECTED TO �`•SMH RIM =79.7 IOD# WETL N v�FER INV.(IN)=76.70 OF PUBLIC WAY. PAVEMENT •
/ 8 I NT
DMH # 2 )
INV. 73.07 EDGE OF
1
4y L PROP. OIL / GRIT SEPARATOR # I
LEGEND: RIM = 80.7 , INIV.= 77.3 (DOUBLE
D OPBLEBINL� GRATE)
SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN RIM = 84.7
INV.= 81.5
-- -80 - -EXISTING CONTOUR '► ALTERNATIVE 3 "
80 -PROPOSED CONTOUR
LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON ARE S EXISTING SEWER LINE F.P. SITE PLAN OF LAND IN
APPROXIMATE AND ARE BASED ON FIELD LOCATION OF ALL S PROPOSED SEVIVER LINE �
o PROPOSED ASH TREE
D EXISTING DRAIM LINE
_ VISIBLE STRUCTURES SUCH AS CATCH BASINS , MANHOLES , \ SALEM MASS -
WATER GATES , ETC. AND COMPILING INFORMATION FROM D PROPOSED DRAIN LINE
PLANS SUPPLIED BY VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES AND R D PROPOSED ROOF DRAIN LINE / \ 4��`BRUCE 'y�y PREPARED FOR: SALEM HOSPITAL 7
EXISTING PROPIERTY LINEEY
GOVERNMENT AGENCIES. IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 82, 83 x 0 EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION Po' ' PROPOSED LONDON PLANETREE .� Ito,78536
SECTION 40 INCLUDING AMENDMENTS .ALL CONTRACTORS FG=81.0 PROPOSED FINIISH GRADE ELEVATION ,. + �'Y" �° SCALE: 1 " = 20 ' DATE: MARCH 12 , 1992.
SHOULD NOTIFY IN WRITING ALL UTILITY COMPANIES AND
CB ® CATCH BASIN
.� f "o`,aLS� SCHOFIELD BROTHERS INC.GOVERNMENT AGENCIES PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION WORK OR s M H O SEWER MANHOLE � - � � _ ,
LIGHT POLE FI / i J'' 9L PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS & PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS
CALL DIG-SAFE AT 1 -800-322-4844. o A 20 WETLAND FLAG WITH NUMBER - PARKING SPACES TO BE PAINTED DROP OFF" 1071 WORCESTER ROAD , FRAMINGHAM , MASS. 01701
' EXISTING TREE OR BRUSH LINE COPYRIGHT 1992 , BY SCHOFIELD BROTHERS , INC.
s
` INV.= INVERT ELEVATION
t EMPLOYEE PARKING SPACE WHEN APPROVED BY REVISED: 4/29 REVISED: 5/28/92
• • • • • • • • • • • • SALEM WETLAND DISTRICT BOUNDARY REVISED: 10/30/92 "� 0 10 20 40 80 FEET
SOIL TEST PIT LOCATION THE SALEM PLANNING BOARD .,
.
REVISED: 4/7/94
r.
100' WETLAND BUFFER ZONE 0 5 10 20 METERS
SHEET I OF 3 1L 7 BUJ
III
SUPPORT POLE �PgR�C SEE RIP-RAP SPECIFICATIONS
POLE FILTER FABRIC POLES —�. �� SIDEWALK A L HEADWALL HEADWALL
STAKED HAYBALES
W HAY OR PIPE INLET
F�-0 STRAW BALE OR OUTLET 6" LOAM AND
GRADE Inil �141q -� p �.� CUR@ T SEEDPIPE
�IIIII 1111111 Ilid - r' pVS� �NSMo 10' MIN. X OR OIUTLET 1
TAMPED ��R� � N 1
� Q ���� —] H a PIPE DIAMETER AT
6" SOIL .%��%�'% SIDEWALK .. "
TAMPED P1'�Pg�p - 6f, Is, 3 g CURB TRANSITION ••O .. HEADWALL TO 12 AT END
• OF RIP-RAP
ANCHOR � � /�/
SOIL �O '-� .O 0Qc) =s:•
6„ TRENCH �� ' iii iii•i' = FLOW AQ�Q� "T •'•• 0G�
- � A C7.'4 . .v Cj SEE BELow • ;. pd�...;• STAINLESS STEEL 24" HEAVY DUTY HS20-44 LOADING CAST
rrl���'��� -- •' SECTION A—A ' • ••, 9" CUTOFF Lo:= SUPPORT STRAP IRON FRAME AND VENTED COVER
ry F�GF OF ROADWAY ., Vf-
OR
THREADED END CAPS (PVC)
FOR SILT FENCE USE APPROVED EQUAL. INSTALL BY VARIABLE TO 8 CE OF CURQ 6" MIN. COMPACTED SEE HEADWALL
RECOMMENDED TOE-IN TRENCH METHOD. TAMPED 12:1 SLOPE OR FLATTER DETAIL BRICKS FOR
GRAVEL BED GRADE REINFORCED CONCRETE SLAB TOP
SOIL ROADWAY (HS20-44 LOADING)
ADJUSTMENT
2 RE-BARS , STEEL PICKETS cuTTER RIP—RAP OUTFALL OR INLET DETAIL ' ' • 8" SCH.40 PVC
. .
OR 2"X2" WOOD STAKES 1 1/2' 8" SCH.40 PVC •• s PVC TEE FLOW
TO 2' IN GROUND 3" " '•
SURFACE COURSE (NO SCALE) •�_
STAKED HAYBALE AND SILT FENCE FOUNDATION 4,W0„ 3,1 5 2 so RIP-RAP SPECIFICATIONS: FLOW 12�� INLET
NOTES: 5'-0" 2'-9" 6.33 9„ 4„ so
SEDIMENT BARRIER DETAIL 1. THE DIMENSIONS SHOWN AT ROADWAY EDGE ARE FIXED DISTANCES. 6' 2•_O•• 7,2 I : 6" MIN. RADIAL BLOCKS
2. RAMP CROSS-SECTION TO BE SAME AS ADJACENT SIDEWALK; I.E. 7'-0" l '-3" 8.0 X = 1.5 FOR HEADWALL I so
(NO SCALE) DEPTH OF SURFACE AND FOUNDATION. .� OR PRECAST CONCRETE
3. PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE RAMPS ARE TO BE TEXTURED BY 8'-0" 0'-0" 1 8.1 5 o o
SECTION
BROOMING IN A DIRECTION PARALLEL TO THE LENGTH OF Li •
THE RAMP . 4" MIN. •
RIP-RAP SHALL CONSIST OF EVENLY GRADED 9" TO 12" '
WHEEL CHAIR RAMP DETAIL ANGULAR BROKEN STONE , WITH A THICKNESS "T" OF •• ' • o a ' ' • •• •
18 INCHES . 6" CRUSHED STONE
FOR SIDEWALK UP TO 8 ' WIDE ) 15 PERCENT OF THE STONE MAY BE SCATTERED SPALLS CONCRETE BASE CAST IN PLACE
OR PIE PLATES WITH CENTER
- BLOCK OR PRECAST (NO SCALE) AND STONES NOT LESS THAN 6" IN SIZE
CATCH BASIN . FILLED OR PRECAST MONOLITHIC BASE
_ NOTE:
SIZE DESIGNATION REFERS TO MEAN SPHERICAL DIAMETER.
OIL / GRIT SEPARATOR DETAIL
vi D D❑❑ TYPE 1-1 BITUMINOUS (NO SCALE)
I Q(� ❑❑ FILL SPA CONCRETE PAVEMENT IN GRANITE OR POURED IN PLACE
ACES BETWEEN TWO LAYERS. CONCRETE CURB SINGLE INLET USE LEBARON CAT.NO. LF 244
D103 BALES WITH 1 1/2#t t" TOP COURSE (SEE SHEET f t of 3 ) DOUBLE INLET USE LEBARON CAT.NO. LV 2448-1
El ED 0 CRUSHED STONE OR APPROVED EQUAL
D 2" BINDER COURSE 6"
FINISHED GRADE HEAVY DUTY (HS20-44) LOADING NOTE: CAST IRON FRAME & COVER
PARKING 6 = PAVEMENT FRAME AND GRATE FOR DRAIN MANHOLE # 4 „ „
(MIN. WT. 465 LBS.) DRAIN
STAKED HAYBALES ir LOT
" ° ° ° USE BEEHIVE INLET GRATE
° ° & FRAME , NEENAH R-256 1
_ ° ° o°°° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° 6"° N OR APPROVED EQUAL PAVEMENT
-- ° ° ° CONCRETE
° ° COLLAR
12M ACTSGRAVID ° ° g ° °�° • • 24 x 48 ADJUST TO GRADE CONCRETE
° °
00 °° °°°o COMPACTED o .•• • s o** •. : �....•••**% WITH BRICK COURSES COLLAR
NA DOUBLE
PLAN VIEW o GRAVEL ° ° ° 24 SINGLE BRICKS FOR
° ° Pol
. •� •... see .• FLAT SLAB TOP (HS20-44 LOADING)
CURB & PAVEMENT DETAIL to
' 6" THREADED oADJUSTMENT 24"
A1KED HAYBALES (NO SCALE) -�- PVC CAP • ' TAIPER IN 3 OR 4
. • PRECAST CONCRETE MONOLITHIC BASE 811 MIN.
AND RISERS AS NECESSARY. COURSES
12" ALTERNATIVE: P.ADIAL CONCRETE
A PVC SCHAO BLOCKS FILL KEYWAYS WITH 'MORTAR. STEPS AT 16"
CLEAN ORDINARY OUTLET "A" PVC TEE
• 6" MIN.
EARTH BORROW DULFOR # DO
NOTE: • 5' DIA. FOR CB 2 DEPTH OF SUMAP = 4' MIN.
AT CB # 2 JOINT 4 4 " 'DIk FOR CB #
# 6 ' HORIZONTAL JOINTS WITH FULL
S
AT 12 PVC TO BED OF MORTAR _
4" MIN. LOAM TOPSOIL --� 4" MIIN. 12" RCP TO BE :• .• • .: .• • . • . . �
w
pl ENCASED IN • • • • • PRECAST CONCRETE BASE
= b o = III CONCRETE OUTSIDE ALTERNATIVE: CAST IN PLACE 4 DIAM.
III '• ';o.:�:'p' = T CATCH BASIN HORIZONTAL JOINTS
PITCH TABLE
FILTER FABRIC MIRIFI - III 6" CRUSHED WITH FULL BED OF TO W. 1/4"/FT.
140 N OR APPROVED jl1 0 ; 4, = CB 1 A=8"
STONE MORTAR
EQUAL ; , w CB 2 AND # 4 A = 12" PIPE
3 4 TO 1 1 2 • ; . �� CB 3 A = 10" RETROFIT TO EXISTING CATCH BASIN 6" MIN. RADIAL \
/ / " >g BLOCKS (FILL
EADEM
WASHED STONE ; 24 =a CATCH BASIN DETAIL KEYWAYS WITH �* "
CATCH BASIN SEDIMENT TRAP DETAIL 6" PERFORATED a.w W MORTAR) OR . •
N (NO SCALE) PRECAST CONC. EvaE •
(N0 SCALE) SCH.40 PVC PIPE III ,,. 6.. o.. SECTIONS • ' 2"
• ' At •
At
ACMELITE SEALANT OR APPROVED a a & At -
EQUAL , TO BE APPLIED PRECAST CONCRETE BASE OR °
BETWEEN NESTABLE PIPE AND CONCRETE BASE CAST IN PLACE INVERTED ARCH Z °o o °° 6" CRUSHED
t" ��+ INTERCEPTOR DRAIN DETAIL HEADWALL PRIOR To BOLTING OR "PIE PLATE" WITH CENTER FILLED .� ° 8 STONE
12"
3-#3 TIE BARS 12" ( NO SCALE ) 1/2 SECTION OF 24" CMP "All T BRICK CHIPS AND MORTAR
Y WHEELING NESTABLE PIPE RIP-RAP INLET CHANNEL OR CLASS A CONCRETE
( (SEE DETAIL)
GROUND OR BOLTED TO APPROVED
DFAEQUAL) DRAIN MANHOLE DETAIL
/ 'I; LINE
2-#3 TIE BARS 3-#3 TIE 3/4" X 3/4" CHAMFER 10' MEDIUM DUTY C.I. HALF
I2" ROUND GRATE (NO SCALE)
VERTICAL BARS 1/4" PREMOLDED EXPANSION JOINT (NEENAH R-4976-1 TYPE A)
' __ 112OR APPROVED EQUAL
AT 12" MATERIAL AND SEALANT —PRECAST OR 8" DIA.PIPE LOCKED TO 1/2 SECTION CMP
.4 01 z18„ t 1/2" CLEAR 4" CONCRETE WALKWAY 6 POURED IN PLACE CONCRETE HEADWALL
CLASS "A" CONCRETE
CURB (FOR REB SA INDOTAIL AT 1.5 l 1.5
BITUMINOUS LEFT �i �� I - 8 DIA. PIPE , EXISTING
END ELEVATION - – – _
OR NEW SCH.40 PVC
A, ;< < •- a CONCRETE 1 ori
1" PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE 0 R FIELDSTONE • - 4 _ -a . 6 PAVEMENT I , PIPE TO EXTEND 4" " ALTERNATIVE 3 "
MORTAR CAP COMBINATION ENDS FOR .. o o ' I BEYOND HEADWALL
6 COMPACTED GRAVEL BASE
12" HEADWALL # 1 �a - c . 4 . - r , , I 10' SITE PLAN OF LAND IN
12" a 0 O , a o' IMIN .
SALEM MASS .
181
/ GROUND �� ' . - � a` Q 12r d 12�� � ` ' �
�LJNE COMPACTED SUBGRADE _
�\� •� e 6 •4 - Q EYBRUE PREPARED FOR: SALEM HOSPITAL
HEADWALL 1 DETAIL - • ' v ClYfL
"_ . HEADWALL I POND OUTLET DETAIL �Z psyE
(NO SCALE) . a • . , rroHA`Fy, SCALE: AS NOTED DATE: MARCH 12 , 1992.
t \\
t8 \ a
FIELDSTONE SECTION = a ( No SCALE)
IMBEDDED IN �, ' 3/, y'- SCHOFIELD BROTHERS , INC.
MORTAR r �, 4" 4: 6 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS & PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS
END ELEVATION ��� 4 '0 O - 1071 WORCESTER ROAD ItFRAMINGHAM It MASS. 01701
` F =���=r�i—rir=rii=rig`
REV. 5/28/92 COPYRIGHT 1992 , BY SCHOFIELD BROTHERS It INC.
FIELD STONE
REV. 10/30/92
MASONRY ENDS - CONCRETE SIDEWALK AND CURB DETAIL REV 4/7/94
( N 0 SCALE ) REV. 4/29/94
SHEET 2 OF 3 R 7 (G
t
1►
D. THE POND LEVEL SHALL THEN BE TEMPORARILY LOWERED TO NOTE:
APPROXIMATELY ELEVATION 77 BY PUMPING . MAINTAIN THE POND DRAWDOWN UNDER ITEMS C AND D SHALL BE DONE w
POND AT THIS ELEVATION UNTIL INSTALLATION IS COMPLETE. CO
E. A SILT FENCE BARRIER SHALL BE INSTALLED AROUND THE SLOWLY TO PREVENT DOWNSTREAM FLOODING . MAXIMUM 8 '9
# 1 AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN , OUTFLOW RATE SHALL NOT EXCEED 0.5 CFS DURING DRAWDOWN. 6 c
LOCATIONS OF HEADWALL C' � =
THE INSTALLATION OF HEADWALL # 1 AND ASSOCIATED PIPES \ FA
SILT FENCE SHALL BE ENVIROFENCE OR APPROVED EQUAL . 4
\ T9 I
INSTALL BY THE MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDED "TOE-IN- AND RIP-RAP SHALL BE PERFORMED AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE
TRENCH" METHOD. TO MINIMIZE THE TIME NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN THE / •• ' • • • • • ' • . e 88 x 6 89 x 7 0d
F. REMOVE THE EXISTING 8 INCH AC PIPE AND INSTALL THE PROPOSED, 8" PIPE LOWERED POND ELEVATION . -� •� \ _ �'
�� A<
IF REQUIRED , HEADWALL , RIP-RAP AND STABILIZATION AND DMH#7 /
G. ALLOW THE POND TO REFILL, BUT MAINTAIN ' e • \ \ a
SILT FENCE IN PLACE UNTIL DISTURBED AREA IS STABILIZED. / • / \ e • \ �� -
\ ' • \ = I 11 . 13
92 xo / / \ • ' R L= 95.05 ' 4900, 87 x 1
•� 0s ,
• sox 9 �•-� /• • •_�
xo
� � • • •80x9 \ •
j`
\
8 / (p2 \
•
F 83 • •\ \
74x4 0
0,� . \ \
6` �� - o
•
ALMEDA STREET0 00 / •ee • 0 C31 _, A
• \ • PA�ENIEN •• -
O �.'OF •�.,T � _�- .21� • � �i /� \ ��\ LOCgTEp \0 ` \ :
76x5 EDGE •• \ R - 319 103 -4 �.. ' - -_ _ _ N • •
--: 59.93 -- / °'s/ • •
UM 0 � r rl \ • � � �. e\
EXISTINGS P T BE BACKFILLED IN 8 LIFTS 1 N 4401 30 W ' • - - --,� \
WITH CLEAN GRAVEL BORROW AND COMPACTED I _ _ PROP. DMH # 8 / , - �•
TO 95 � OF MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY AND PAVED i FG= '\RIM = 80.2 , // / WATER ELEVATION (OUTLET PIPE BLOCKED) _ _ ` \ • .
WITH 3" OF BITUMINOUS CONCRETE , 80 x 8 fMV.= 75.3 / / �� TAKEN 12/19/91 , ELEV.= 79.8 BY SCHOFIELD BROTHERS , INC. e\ 85 x 4
79x1 ; \ / // TAKEN 9/4/90 ELEV.= 78.5 BY ATLANTIC ENGINEERING AND SURVEY CONSULTANTS - -__ \ • •\
PROP. DMH # 4 (WITH BEEHIVE - _ •
i INLET GRATE) : PROPOSED CHAIN •
RIM = 72.2 LINK FENCE A5 / t ` •
\ \
INV. 69.71 (12�;? : x FG =80.8 z P6 0 „i, \ �� \� \�� • \
HEADWALL TO BE REMOVED INV. - 69.46 (15 ) Q �.• / \
BENCHMARK : �:, o I WETLAND I
CHISELED SQUARE ON TOP cit � D :LINEATION � i �\\\��\ ` \• � • \
C?T CONCRETE HEADWALL . TE PORARY YB S - �: PROPOSEDW.P.I. INC
D ARO N,; BCc 2 BY WP. 1 I
ELEVATION - 73 .74 \ \
�-�.� OPEN - 9/21/90 � I I ��� �� ••
D G CO II�Ti '..m PLAY-YARD FG = 80.5 EDGE OF SPREADING PHRAGMITES (GIANT REED) -__ _ •
/SEE ET ' x I I AS OF 12/91 DUE TO ELEVATED POND LEVEL �� �� •
# 5 �j'' x FG= 80.8 1 RESULTING FROM BLOCKED POND OUTLET
I
Cn` 78x9 I I PROP. DWH # 7 / 1 (9
\pRCp � r.. aa) w � ' ...� 1 RIM = 80.8 -- --- - `� _ �'
�N PROP. CB r 4 ►, -
67 p = LAWN & SAND `Q• As I A9 6 INV. - 74.83 A 22
6' IM 0TH G PROPOSED 6 ;; I i
\ \
-- -_ '�' INV.= 6 I NIGH STOCKADE 8 INv.=. 76.6± EXIST PIPE PROPOSED TEMPORARY SILT
-....d......._.....-
.►�
t AP LY .t Q ' = FENCE AROUND HEADWALL A21 23
Z � 8 �� INV. 74.67 / ••-.-•-•••� � _..._......o
NCE
NG
WITH VATION PERTYLO NE ♦ I j j 12 INV.-= 74.30 �!:°r �� `""' -„�� '' ---•.._..._......._...Q..._._............... .._..;
to 0 CotoAREA T �'� SHED I _ ♦ I , 1 AND ASSOCIATED , �.:
��� --- .•�A2,S 86x8
oo ti t- �o SEED. I x FG-80.8 ♦ - 4\20
I 1
r �cn m m i O SHED 76 x 8 PORTION OF _ 1 /;/ RIP RAP EXISTING 8�� OUTLET PIPE IS TO BE / /rf' / 80 g
26
STONE -' WALL TING PIPE 30" EXISTING 8 PIFPE INLET REPLACED WITH 8 SCH. 40 PVC , /
LD z z z ° , „ �`- e D TO REMOVED WILLOW INV.- 78.0 ,�- / 6.' ASH
�� II „ RCP q�4° 37 25 W� --- :_E-IST - p8- AC_ I ---------------
[11
------ / / :/
c� =N _ 'v is @-- -15 [) - 0� Q ' - D ° ------ ----p -- ------� I PROPOSED HEADWALL # 1 --
. . .•-a N o ( T 12 - R£f"`-- 8 Ar 4.41 % 1 /
% _ EXIS • . INVERT = 78.0 EXIST. ,! ///
- f _ - 7b „MAPLE r 0) REM
AI - -P • ♦ - r - ❑ 15��LOCUST
F-L�' ' t I O 12 TWIN MAPLE 5 1.3 I - .82 • o O.o ` ' - ' _ - --
♦ -
�- �, X cr ROPO � PN AND L,ANTINGS Q `�' ♦�,, �, _ '" - -- - - _ - _ - .14
i4 A ` / A�f9 ----
/ �,r
FENCE
x.-. 0 C3 M L i Lu p / ` • ♦ ' U t P Jam..... - I \ / /
ST HAYBALE SILT --- �'
; i
L- -_._ ♦ '�, z�u ' G� ,.� a -, ,,, �T .� -_ _ AND SEDIMENT BARRIER �
c°'o to f 5 j • FG-80.612
♦ r•. ✓-?l 13 - > - _ n A I'6 - - - /
T 1 /II TP# 2 - - PROPOSE LAWN �� i` A �- NOTE: /
II 11 II
G=60.6
�- I TPS 4 AND P NGS +� ♦- 4 \..- _ - - - - /�
c zzz S �` • • �' x ,, /- ♦�!�• f x♦ _� \ `? �°j91 __ __ ,,.� / (3)9"CHERRY MULTI STEM APPROXIMATE WETLAND DISTRICT BUFFER ZONE
t, > > > - d -8�J.6 ' • • �, qj, m w m rr� v... 1..a .rte•... -- -.. ��,.,•/ / ♦� ❑ WILLOW AS SCALED FROM MAPS ENTITLED WETLAND AREAS
7t� W • • S, FG=80.8 -��� .r.- __ N .►-."''' ___ �--- ♦� � �--�� ` c r cc , c ,� R _ L.
_ _ _ i o Y OF . ADEM MA��ACHJ. ETrS x 14 PREPA..EC) EY: G ,-
-- N - � � � / PROPOSED BUILDING e2 RAMP w - . _
c� 0 , • • • e • • -•-•- s-; GJq p�j •l e�r�' �■��Ir1ir>, _��� do t DR. JEROME LONG DATED MARCH 15, 1977 . r-
x - , t C0 r r 1 C NC. WALK f • -tet` - �� k
_ C O 0 -
-' co
x 4 8 _
T P 46 1 / ( 12 5 I p p �� ____-• �• r \ _ - - F ' '�-8 tC /
O - G'p� �o'° �. -E GE 0 ,ONC. r1ALK >�IF
I !- m SLAB ELE�, - 81 .0 °��° + ,° ° r,� F RM„ s�� CURB •
ENT
` \ -
PAVEME2E c,: .--� 15„ SPRUCENT PAINTED�O
/ TOP OF FOUNDATION WALL = 82.0 •�TYP p
�n � �- / , • �'�� . . '
M O 10' J TP# 3 O - PROP. CB # 1 e TO ENTRANCE TP#5 > h'qY i _ _i " . • i •
- PROPOSED LAWN AND PLANTINGS Q` a RIM = 80.5 66 - , • ,� _`� ' • f
n: II r y INV.= 7.5 /
' > 10� FG= 6 ,, ��P O I / •e , , ;/ ,9 // / J/I CL.
/,'/ , ❑ 12 SPRUCE �� ��� \ \ L • ' • , •
ate- FG- Bi ,41 / •/ ,
/ �` • � ��
1 78 i(8 -F80-� ------ y ,� ,�� +�� / �. �0� / ' ` • •• • / �� / 6 HCHERRY
ACKBE • • -i�
ti PRtOP. DMH # 2 ,�` V' ; . (3) 6 RRl' . --
• • • 13 • ' ---
PROP CA CONC. CURB 'fYP) - ._1 _ :r_-. -::_ ' • _ e L� _. t
RC - RINM=79.0 F \- :_- ___ w_ _ _ ------
/qr 0 S 12'���INV.=75.3 15INV.=75.0 � �-__.-._____.____� • � • • •
EXISTING LIGHT OLE '-F ' 12" RCP • �- AT-2.26% �" • • v J •
4.3 ° 12 RCP AT 2.22 % 20�p VED j14,66 x • --S 43° 3J 37-E x, x - - - - -
3 J FG= 7
upN
TY P x -- FG=8 6.4 _------
.3 lA vy IN Amu 4r
6 TRANS1 vN TO GRADE FG.=85.5 -
Til X - - -- i
-*-EXISTING CB#3 / `ExISTINOG CURB TO BE PROP. DMH # I RCP
6 TRANSITION TO GRADE '.
PROP. BUILDING SEWER RIM =78.3 RIM =85.2 °
EXIST. INV.= 76.3 � REMOVED \ 83x0 �, _ AT 1.2 /o / t
COLBY
(2)-12 INV.-81.3 84 x 8 85 x 8 ' 86 x 8 S TRE T x - _
��, x �
78x� o S7gx6 S _ -- 5 - - - - - S j , S 88 -4
79 x 2 S ----- -- - ---
EXISTItiG 8" PVC STUB --� SLOPE 1 .71 /o -
� Q-SMH RIM =79 7 SMH RIM = 62 -
`� � INV.{IN)=76.70
(TO BE CONNECTED TO INV.= 73.07 EDGE OF / INV = 76,62 PAVEMENT _- _ a
DMH # 2 ) 61
- -
cu
Lcp w
Q° Q PROP. OIL / GRIT SEPARATOR #
RIM = 80.7 , INV.= 77.3 (DOUBLE INLET GRATE)
LEGEND: PROP. CB # 2
SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN . RIM = 84.7 " ALTERNATIVE 3 `►
INV.= 81 .5 EROSION & SEDIMENTATION CONTROL
-80 -- -EXISTING CONTOUR GENERAL EROSION CONTROL NOTES: 5. ALL DISTURBED AREAS NOT OTHERWISE DEVELOPED OR WHERE
SPECIAL STABILIZATION MEASURES ARE NOT SPECIFIED SHALL ------ - ----=----- -=---=-~-=- - _._-�--��
-- 80 -PROPOSED CONTOUIR THE FOLLOWING ARE GENERAL EROSION CONTROL SPECIFICATIONS TO BE LOAMED AND SEEDED . DEPTH OF LOAM TOPSOIL SHALL SITE PLAN OF LAND IN
LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON ARE S EXISTING SEWER LIME BE EMPLOYED WHEN WORK IS TO TAKE PLACE NEAR WETLAND AREAS BE A MINIMUM OF 4 INCHES .
APPROXIMATE AND ARE BASED ON FIELD LOCATION OF ALL S PROPOSED SEWER LINE TO PROTECT THOSE AREAS FROM ALTERATION: 6. ALL AREAS OUTSIDE THE LIMIT OF WORK ARE TO BE LEFT SVISIBLE STRUCTURES SUCH AS CATCH BASINS , MANHOLES D EXISTING DRAIN LINE UNDISTURBED . THE CONTRACTOR SHALL STAY OUT OF THESE ALE � S1. PRIOR TO ANY DISTURBANCE OR ALTERATIONS OF ANY AREA ON AREAS AND PRESERVE THEIR EXISTING VEGETATION ,
WATER GATES , ETC. AND COMPILING INFORMATION FROM D PROPOSED DRAIN LINE THE SITE WHICH IS UPGRADIENT OF A WETLAND AS SHOWN ON 7. THE FOLLOWING PROCEDURES SHALL BE FOLLOWED FOR THE
RD PROPOSED ROOF DRAIN LINE THE PLAN , A STAKED HAYBALE SEDIMENT BARRIER*SHAL.L BE INSTALLATION OF PROPOSED HEADWALL # 1 AND PREPARED FOR: SALEM HOSPITAL t
PLANS SUPPLIED BY VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES AND EXISTING PROPERTY LINE INSTALLED IN THE LOCATION SHOWN TO PROTECT THAT WETLAND ASSOCIATED RIP-RAP. ti
GOVERNMENT AGENCIES. IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 82, 83 x O EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION AREA • (SEE DETAIL SHEET) A. DRAIN MANHOLES # 4 , 5 AND 6 I
2. ONCE INSTALLED THE STAKED HAYBALE SEDIMENT BARRIER SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH THE INTER-CONNECTING 15"AND 21° j
SECTION 40 INCLUDING AMENDMENTS ALL (CONTRACTORS ��. FG = 81.0 PROPOSED FINISH GRADE ELEVATION SCALE: 1 " = 20 ' DATE: MARCH 12 1992. '
c i BHucE L, PROTECTING A PARTICULAR SECTION OF WETLAND SHALL BE RCP DRAANS.
SHOULD NOTIFY IN WRITING ALL UTILITY COMPANIES AND Er CB ® CATCH BASIN MAJNTAJNED IN PLACE UNTIL ALL AREAS UPGRADIENT FROM THAT B. THE 12 INCH RCP DRAIN FROM DRAIN MANHOLE f 4 SHALL BE
.� N;; 8;=s a SMH 0 SEWER MANHOLE SEC'iION OF WETLAND HAVE BEEN STABILIZED AS SPECIFIED INSTALLEID TO THE LOCATION OF THE OUTLET END OF THE EXISTING SCHOFIELD BROTHERS , INC. !
GOVERNMENT AGENCIES PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION WORK OR - ••� �-,,-
;; �..�°�' - LIGHT POLE HEREIN . 8 INCH AC PIPE. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS & PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS
CALL DIG-SAFE AT 1 -800-322-4844. '% • �� =' 3. THE STAKED HAYBALE BARRIER IS ALSO INTENDED TO ACT AS A C. A TEMPORARY CONNECTION SHALL BE MADE BETWEEN THE 8 INCH r
- �- '-' o A 20 WETLAND FLAG WITH NUMBER 1071 WORCESTER ROAD , FRAMINGHAM , M.ASS. 017031
�. LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE. ANY LAND DOWNGRADIENT OF THE AND THE 12 INCH PIPE AND THE BLOCKAGE OF THE INLET END r
EXISTING TREE OR BRUSH LINEBARRIER ACCIDENTLY DISTURBED SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY OF THE 8 INCH PIPE AT THE POND SHALL BE REMOVED TO COPYRIGHT 1992 BY SCHOFIELD BROTHERS INC.
I
I INV.= INVERT ELEVATION REPAIRED AND RESTORED TO ORIGINAL CONDITION . ALLOW THE POND TO DRAIN TO ITS NORMAL LEVEL.(ELEV.=78.0) --- -- ----- -{
�+ • • • • • • • • • • SALEM WETLAND DISTRICT BOUNDARY 4. A PROPERLY INSTALLED SILT FENCE MAY BE SUBSTITUTED FOR SUBSTMfTE STAKE HAYBALE AND SILT FENCE SEDIMENT BARRIER 0 10 20 40 -- RlD FE T
REVISED: 4/7/94 f� REV. 5/28/92 THE HAYBALE SEDIMENT BARRIER WITH PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE WHERE STAKED HAYBALE BARRIER IS INDICATED ABOVE .
REV 10/30/92 SOIL TEST PIT LOCATION - -----
REVEED:4/29/94% � /.f� . SALEM CONSERVATION COMMISSION
_. ,
f' p1jj, (NOTES CONTINUE ABOVE)
ee:� t ... - .._. ..-... v .. 0
.. .NCAYIT!°R�, 'sk:?".'7T''y..CY'.'1'T;wpn'7:t1t^:A@P ;11'S4" "P'..F.e!Jk4'q";1M,�1",bL'lFT," :'.t'.7"."C7:.f Fq:'A?W.N,h'i. ..?•^r$ •:ti..lp1.....'.,.f ,. tb^#._,'T•.;''
k..
{
i e
,f
i
i
1 ,
i 7 i•
I „
S H E C �.
F
:
3
cc)
do —
I x ( SToci�i �ENLE-� ti
vltilBIN x i
I I
(ur- ;t
Tura �P
w � -iea�EzNNI
J x SOIL �A71[».I k 1— O�
P 0 N D
O 35',A 35' d
a?SND PiO)(
x AND FLA z RT TUZF I
5oi L 5E1 $2, lo?,j
-A�21C, �5ELOW r
LOA►v� lJ F E D I \X 12 �TQI�Li� HEfJ
p vv
Ivvao p a,N -ENJ L a 1® �►D -2- E-�D `, ., - �, I .,. a /�-y`-�. 4 v i L►- l
I r r WAL-k —
I PROPOSED BUILDING
`0 MATLH r4;4T 1—_lX_PP.LWF—t0 �(
? �—25 �A� , WOo-2 CHI r�;p
\ ',A 10, KOW20 P0 V1/0
J
t -
LOAM ?f��b --- -
- -- - -- -- �— — v — — — — — --—--- -- — -- <tu
,�'L�--
LOAM A►.1 n
C C L B Y 5 T R E E T
P LANT L I S T LANDSCAPE
QUANT. BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONDITION REMARKS — -- —
2� ��r✓�IS 74041:�e l( , ► Jai, ��-�,gva9 Z'-3' 1�)� F2 SITE PLAN OF LAND IN
AT+ZOFU;Z'uREA bA�zfRY Z' up
Y
cO�N a SALEM MAS S .
j �9AXINi.J� StNeYLVANIUA WtAIZSISALL)S -5"CAL X413 P3awcHiN.4 6 7"
i_AN�oLArA ��Ix�� ASN " !
PREPARED FOR: SALEM HOSPITAL
2 FI�I U� ;V I�FA Au�TIZ IAM O_A(�K g' f_> i SCALE: 1 " = 2Q ' DATE: MAY 6, 1993
Aub RIAS _A SCHOFIELD BROTHERS
T SNE
PROFESSiONAL ENGINEERS & PROFESSIONAL ...AND ^URVEYORr:
10';1 WORCESTER ROAD FRAI!iNGHAIvI MASS..
Leir,,,`.,.s..; 19 93 -9 . ��•:�I•y�F: '_r; I�I•<r,_i H,. OF NEW ENGLAND
' NURSERY STOCK SHALL CONFORM TO ANSI Z60. 1-1990 a
16760
RESEARCH BY: RJF DRAFTED BY: JRA N/F SULLIVAN ,Q� F ��,
FIELD CHIEF: RJF/PAL CHECKED BY: RJF F C c,
COMPUTED BY: RJF APPROVED BY: RJF \ N I N -- - �� <%
\� ��til R� '-�
c)
40' WIDE
ON P s� _4
N / F R �
VINCENT PARZIALE - - R _ 171 � 5 c AV,Cid/
�A vGti
L - 95. 04'LLJ
\ O F
S
1952 ACCEPTANCE ) PUBLIC 40' WIDE z -
2
-� p = 1g
E__l
°2g' 43
ET Q R = 319.21'
19.21 � ,- -
103.04 ' 776 1346 % co
N 44°16'30" W W , ; i 1410 3 _
- '- - j ' - - 59.93' - ��� II - �8 98 768
p- 04°19 10
29
I I L = 24.06,
- .x
� S2
6' PICKET PENCE .,
O
O I
N / F °=
0
F— DIVIRGILIO �" o ` c) `r'
�
' i
z PON
cv) �
co Lv
>_ X / S 37-40'55"
f E v
� I � �5.98'
SHEDS t7 �, �, �
Ii _
18'59"W 5. 2�
LANDSCAPING R — 4 2CIL, STONE
O
00
S 52° 19'02" W N
I ------ ---- - —— _ 1 J�- ----� u' = 21 .31 ' _ 0 w
\w —
� I � - 103.98' �
Z Q E �4 N 44°37'25" W s' PICKET FENCE _ , �� s LOT 2A
NCE - JX ( WOOD FRAME `� o� AREA, _ __ � 0 '� Q
4' Cf+a.;N LINK EE - i SHED �. � S 4a•43'�1 E s 2 65 , 439 S . F .
-- —x �� _ 8•s w Q o
Q o ; ---- '; ,� a�°�'\so,, 5 5.0 0' , � _ 38 32 6" E- 0 R 1 . 5 0 2 - ACRES �,
-- -
--- - -- _
-- ,- �-, - _ t-0
z
n .� -- - ,
Lc)
__ l
0 0) x - - - ---- - -- S 43.03' 12" E cD
� GNP�N 4 CHAIN LINK r ENCS / � � �-------------�•\� � — 4' CHAIN i..IP:K F ENc160.25'
O w 1 S T 0 R Y W 0 0 D FRAME BUILDING 5 S!D EWALK `� I\ I I\ - ----- ---- x -- ----------- ;( ----- -- ( - -- -- - �-
0 Q I ° # 3 C 0 LB'Y STREET EDGE OF PAVEMENT �� S EDGE of PA.vEMENT
_ - o _-;__--DUMPSTE.R
I CN 0 1• 6' CHAIN LINK {
o `9 -
` o � FENCE
-
i �. ,\
00 ;� LOT # 1 srl
j / ��� f � - 6' WOOD FENCEQD
N /
o � i AREA = 41 , 624 S . F . CC'
I / 1 0R 0 . 956 ACRES ;' � \ - 100.00 -
SIDEWALK / i ° ,
j -- - T S 43'33'37" E " I S 43 55 39 E
EDGE OF PA'v'FMIEN' 471 .13 EDGE OF PAVEMEN ,
_ - ( - ____ -------------—— _ ----- - ---- - _ - - 43.53'
- _ , I 51 . 38' /
—--- -- — S!D EVw' . L - SIDEWALKI K
— _ � K SIDEWALK RA�r ��' SlDE�'VA�
SIDEWALK -- -- --- _ ------------- -- ------ --- -- -----
-
` t\
-
-- ------ g!N G
CURBING _ 514.66 S 43 33 37 E CURBINv c��RBINc�
CURBING C: RgiN�
( 40' WIDE ) WJ,,--j jL' BY
0 10 20 40 80 FEET
0 5 10 20 METERS
APPROVAL UNDER THE SUBDIVISION PLAN OF LAND I N
CONTROL LAW, NOT REQUIRED LOCUS REFERENCE:
SALEM PLANNING BOARD: DEED BOOK # 8361 , PAGE 212.
I CERTIFY THAT THE PREPARATION OF THIS PLAN CONFORMS LAND COURT BOOK # 259, CERTIFICATE # 56181 SALEM , MASS .
WITH THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE REGISTERS OF
DEEDS, AS EVISED THROUGH JANUARY 12, 1988. PLAN REFERENCES: PREPARED FOR: SALEM HOSPITAL
................,............................. _ -
- � �,���!� PLAN BOOK # 230, PAGE 31
' � v. : .... �J.....PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR P��H o` �r,�, 13�q� PLAN BOOK # 122 PAGE 65 SCALE: 1" = 20' DATE-.: OCTOBER 13, 1995
/ �r� JI1�f 0* PLAN PLAN # 442 OF 1952
.......................,................................... DATE:....�Ul.���9-5............... ��f � � '= IZI PLAN # 318 OF 1971 SCHOFIELD BROTHERS
! am a=. REVISED: DEC.4 1995 E S OF NEW ENGLAND, INC .
.......................,................................... 2�u i. PLAN # 50 OF 1972 0
GIST E%.* PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS & PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS o
........................................................... �`�'`✓ LAND #
COURT CASE 856 1071 WORCESTER ROAD, FRAMINGHAM, MASS. 01701
DATE:............... ...................................
COPYRIGHT 1995, BY SCHOFIELD BROTHERS OF NEW ENGLAND, INC.
� 6750
Rc
r
7-1
p
fi
0
C�