CLARK AVENUE - ZONING (3) JU Si on + PIC10i
i \
f
1
I'
f.
j1
f
Tttu of $ct pju, �tt5��chixs�ts� a
Cnettlem Green =
r
x a
x S
N m
CERTIFICATE OF ACTION
DATE: August 2, 1985
TO: Josephine R. Fusco, City Clerk
FROM: City of Salem Planning Board
RE: Nicholas Fiore, Jr. — Subdivision, Clark Ave.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I hereby certify that, pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws, the Salem
Planning Board has taken the following action with respect to the
above—referenced subdivision:
By unamimous vote, the Planning Board approved the proposed subdivision
plan as presented with the attending conditions.
Notice of the Planning Board' s action and the reasons supporting it are
more fully described in the attached letter sent to the applicant by
registered mail., postage prepaid, at his address stated on the petition.
Walter B. Power, III
Chiarman, Planning Board
l
ar Jut
of �ttlezn, �1Httssttr�use##�
�� �Ixrming �uarD m T a
One Salem Green h ,
DECISION
August 2, 1985
MW
2 a
3
Mr. Nicholas Fiore, Jr.
459 Highland Ave.
Salem, MA. 01970
Dear Mr. Fiore:
The Planning Board voted on August 1 , 1985 to approve the proposed
subdivision plan entitled, "Proposed Plot Plan & Profile in Salem, MA.
for Nicholas Fiore, Jr. ," dtaed May, 1985, subject to the following
conditions.
1 . Proposed road extension will be a minimum of twenty—eight feet of
pavement ;
2. Road construction shall consist of 12" of wearing surface, 2" base
over 12" of gravel;
3. The proposed temporary turn—around shall be paved according to the
above specifications for road construction;
4. Any construction within 100' of the wetlands area as delineated on
City Salem Wetlands maps shall be subject to the approval of the
Conservation Commission;
5. The extension of the sewer shallbe subject to the review and
approval of the Engineering Department;
6. Drinking water supply shall meet the requirements of the Engineering
Department and state private water supply regulations;
7. An easement for the turnaround shallbe granted to the City in a
form acceptable to the Engineering Department and City Solicitor;
8. Utilities, including electricity, telephone, and communications to
serve the proposed dwelling shall be placed underground. All electrical
cable shall be encased in conduit unless otherwise specified by the City
Electrician.
9. All construction shallbe limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. — 5:00
p.m. , weekdays and 8:00 a.m. — 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays. No work shall be
conducted on Sundays. Inside work of a quiet nature will be permitted
at other times;
10. A pre—blast survey shall be performed prior to commencement of
construction. Any blasting shall be subject to the Fire Protection Code
(M.G.L. 118 S. 10A and 527 C.M.R. 13 .00)
Il
— Page 2 —
11 . Drilling and blasting shall be limited to Monday — Friday between
8:00 a.m. — 5:00 p.m. There shall be no drilling or blasting on
Saturdays, Sundays or holdiays.
12. All construction shall be carried out in accordance with the Rules
and Regulations of the Planning Board. A Clerk of the Works shallbe
provided for utility inspection by the City at the expense of the
developer as is deemed necessary by the Director of Public Services and
the City Planner.
13 . There shall be no storage of commercial vehicles on the property.
This endorsement shall not take effect until a copy of the decision
bearing the certification of the City Clerk that twenty days have
elapsed and no appeal has been filed or that if such appeal has been
P PP
filed, that is has been dismissed or denied, is recorded in the grantor
index under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on
the owner' s certificate of title. The fee for recording or registering
shall be paid by the owner or applicant .
I hereby certify that a copy of this decision and plans is on file
with the City Clerk and a copy is on file with the �(Planning Board.
Walter B. Power, III
Chairman
X GENERAL NOTES
s� 7) THIS PLAN IS THE RESULT OF AN ON THE GROUND FIELD
JAL
SURVEY AND PUBLIC AND PRI VA TE PLANS.
focus
2) U TILI TIES SHOWN ARE BASED UPON FIELD SURVEY AND
RECORD PLANS AND ARE NOT NECESSARILY INDICA TI VE OF
9io UNDERGROUND CONDI TIONS.
ooEY 9` � I
`� Fw J) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING AND
1> '
I FRANK N. CLARK DETERMINING THE LOCA TION, SIZE AND ELEVA TION OF ALL
EXISTING UTILITIES, SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN ON THESE PLANS,
PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED
IN WRITING OF ANY U TILI TIES FOUND INTERFERING WITH THE
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AND APPROPRIATE REMEDIAL ACTION
LOCUS MAP
JAMES SKAL l OT l S BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.
II 4
'00000000000
4?
7,5.1j 33 _ 4) THIS PLAN lS BASED ON THE REFERENCED PLANS, DEEDS
ASSESSORS MAP 14 LOT 279 '97
9g .—� d- ' ,
l,y AND THE RESUL TS OF A FIELD SUR VEY AS OF THIS DA TE.
NO CER TIFI CA TION IS INTENDED AS TO PROPERTY TITLE
1F=die ' - rn OR AS TO THE EXISTENCE OF UNWRITTEN OR UNRECORDED
LOT 631A 8 630A I �+ O
EA SEMEN TS
00
° AREA 19 , 430i SF . -.•�''�
loo
ottA
'� HAYBALE DETAIL
toe - F
!-
/ � S I r � �'� I00 FT. BUFFER ZONE
------__ - 'O°�' 6(�P� �., `�� PROPOSED SMH NV 95.85
W ,
6
11 soll // 1O 01 G� RIM I O I OEDO;NO
DTAIL
'gyp •Ncu ruE3T suit iowAD
OPOSED DRAINPIPE .A1Y1OUS_Y{q0ApA
PR
_ - 10 y X99 �� E
'DOUNO DALES PLACED ON CONTOUR
211( AA 3T[C�AIC xr
..1. ! , 1 ` FT 3. TLOA l:i 3TAXX3
l°' ESpORCE AREA . r 100 _ ` , Il:-TD=IV GROUND OAHC IS1AA1,; F1usD
1 - ----- -- -- d OF R 1 _, { wiiN tALLi
ov' N EDGEco
r ANCHOR NG fTAiL
" � 1 GLEN 8 BARBARA ERPS
tu�a�s A
IN A R
M AT TIf TOE OF A
1. ats lral DE PL W- GLCPE CH o1 TK .COIR A10J'1 INITN
� RESOURCE AREA FLAGGING � 4 E
LOT 629 .,a,T.�1TLT A�.�,T�T,E�Aa�T,A�s
inn BY PAUL SOMM -
ER -- # EAcN mi uv L zE utEpI ED IN TIE XIL A MIRLMM (4) ItiDo AID fvra so
1 + of UICK4 AAE KR:ZII IAL...
( 3, Ewn ROL-11E xopf ll maoic IN PLACE IFY EITIEF S7AYL3 CH AL-WAS pRIVEt
TI XQi TIE Lt.LA. ItE FIRST STAIQ IN 1/71 i11.E So PE CRIYQI ToKhW TIE
RESOURCE AREA TO �K. SC 1AYIQALT LAID&ALE AT A'1 kG-S ,^'CRS,IEC&:1S ER. ST j St lL k
,7 :r.1.C;rt4�,>!'t?1 TEE (:Li: -Tk.
1
BE REPLICATED I5 SF. o,� O` { c, IKSMECTICh?Vy� FRLU&41 AM FFyAIA AU_ACLVCI Slue 14 P.ZE 1wO11TLr As
FIJI I , .?I),j • S Etta 9v,1 !;E WVPM Ma OV NAV% SLICVL7 11EWI UiE1W(ES.S W AS NJf IC &.QS
j CA Irfl:U M344 F1rA CH LRAIW7,
PROPOSEDI/91% 2 '0a'`
RALPH F. SALVO STAKED HAYBALES-
L T 632 /00
I 1
t
LIJ
AREA TO BE REPLICATED
150' SF. -
IU
LLJ
o
1001)
I 1 y robs
100 . 00
kj
N 20 18 ' -40' W, BENCHMARK
-PROPOSED SMH FIRE HYDRANT
foo --�U RIM 100.2* INV,94,45 i S--O J r Bo I t under L in 'Dar I i ng '
FREEMAN RO D � ' �:* ��,.,� � �, ELEV. ►02 .80
PROPOSED 2'
- SITE DEVELOPMENT
BLOWOFF PLAN OF LAND
c OCA TE IN
SEEMORE � 34 �a� X0:,3 SALEM , MASS .
ST .
* � PREPARED BY
1.000
EASTERN LAND SURVEY ASSOCIATES, INC.
" PAPER
STREET "
CHRISTOPHER R. MEL L 0, PLS
40 LOWELL ST. PEABODY, MA. 01960
(508) 531 -8121
L E G E N-.D.— SCALE: 1 " = 20' MARCH 13, 1992
• SMH PROPOSED SEWER MANHOLE o SMH EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE ZONING DISTRICT R-1 PREPARED FOR
• DMH PROPOSED DRAIN MANHOLE o DMH EXISTING DRAIN MANHOLECB PROPOSED CATCH ---- -- --
HYD PROPOSED HYDRANTASIN HYD EXISTING HYDRANTCB EXISTING CATCHASIN FRONTLOTREA YARDO, 0015SFT. DANIEL A R C H I B A L D
WG PROPOSED WATER GATE WG EXISTING WATER GATE
SIDE YARD 10 FT. PHOTO REPRODUCTION OF THE ABOVE SEAL IS
-- t�
100 PROPOSED CONTOUR — — 100 — EXISTING CONTOUR REAR YARD 30 FT. INDICATIVE OF UNAUTHORIZED REPRODUCTION -z --�
PROPOSED SPOT GRADE 100.00 EXISTING SPOT GRADE LOT WIDTH 100 FT. OF THIS PLAN AND IS TO BE CONSIDERED A
100x0 COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT AND/OR FRAUD.
-a- UTILITY POLE ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITY SHALL NOT ACCEPT
PROPOSED RETAINING RETAINING WALL PHOTO REPRODUCTION FOR ANY PURPOSE.
WALL STONE WALL
BITUMINOUS CURB io 20 4c so Po
PROPOSED HAYBALE:S
X X FENCE
E 883
� to
10
O \ e,
e
( 09'b8
IR
0
o OO �c04
(OZ 'b6) LO
�D
05tZ IAd N
SALEM PLANNING BOARD
to
,2 N
h
iu (95'b6 }
m
N (a
O -
a
a
DATE
3
0 49, 350.56 S.F. i
(0Z'96) 0 0 0 v O
00tZ IAd 0 0 01 c (Z9"b6) N
ao
m
CD I 0 0
at It 0 1-
,c ti
a G m
aif
v > ° (D
c c '
U _ U-)
n U ti Ct
o (Ib'b6) t
d
0
LL
a
OLO
z o
(06-£6)
05.1 OA d (06'£6) _
0)
C �
N
N - ,
3
0
tuawa^od pu3
C NOTE : Benchmark =100.00 Assumed.
Proposed Elevations ( )
c
oc ti
o' 87.3
�► (Top Found.=96.00)
O -C\, z
c E r- - - - - - zo
w N t?9'Z8 ^ul O V ~ w 90.3+ Proposed 1 90.2
I
J — 09'36 =w!a x o Foundation 1 0
W N 1 Q CLq&,kAvf b
a 'R
IL
O c' r (Inv.= 87_00) 91.1 ►
O W 43 - - 30.0 9 _4.3 I y
a_ s > y atA
o ,
r o
0 M
W
100.00 -
!c, _ _ m
,.� .-Existing S.M.H
ro a) Rim=9 2.6 0 Al. %. s
m.
.-Limit of Road Improvement �^
' Inv.=82.68
et
00 Proposed ,6 1.0% S
m ( S m tri F
CLARK AVE. 01 -s,; PROPOSED PLOT PLAN & PROFILE
to IN
SALEM, MA.
OD
o ms FOR
to O to O s .
m m Co C00
Co Is NICHOLAS P. FIORE JR. 469 HIGHLAND AVE.
SALEM, MA.
RAYMOND cyc ,
P. PLOT PLAN PROFI LE
WMANUS SCALE I"=40' HOR. I"=20'
o.92340 VERT. I =2'
FGfSTE
MAY 1985
LANDMARK ENGINEERING a
SURVEYING INC.
LYNN, MA.
s
i
ce
Q -
o
0 1 .
Ike
( 09'b a ^ul> I��e
°
o
N r
,
T3
o �4 °
(OZ 'b6) '
OS+Z IAd (0Z b6) N
SALEM PLANNING BOARD
toN
�
(95'b6 -
d
to CO
O
n
a d -
DATE
O 49, 350-56 S.F.
(OZ"S6) o 0 0 d O
00*Z Ind 9 o oI c( Z9'b6) N
m
CO
CD
ao I O
it o
C r a-
0 c N
v > �
c c c o
U_
to (0
C) ti
(tb'b6) t
v
o_
U_
CL:
O z o
(06'9 6) to
05.1 OA d (06"£6) - cl
C (p
(\j N
3
o
auawaAod Pu3
Q) NOTE : Benchmark =100.00 Assumed.
Proposed Elevations ( )
w
C
2
o c y
o 0 67.3 c
c► (Top Found.=96.00) z
0
N C
O N O F= F'_ 1 Proposed t 90"2
W _�� 89 ZS = ^ul O N_ ° 90.31 ••
1 v,
J = - 09'26 =w!a x E w ' Foundation 1 0 —
F ; CLA LK n✓6
W y(•
O Ir - - - r I Q
(Inv. Q
_= 87.00) 91"1 c ►f
0_ O W a a, 30.0 - f - - -�, q `
C U S
100.00 m -
.-Existing S.M.H
M N. 7.. S.
M rn Rim=92.60
a
rn� .-Limof Road Improvement "
Inv.=82.68
'tt OD MS e• Prof sed 5 1.0% S
CLARK AVE. s`,o PROPOSED PLOT PLAN B PROFILE
to - I N
SALEM, MA.
o to FOR
U') O "' om
CD s NICHOLAS P. FIORE JR. 469 HIGHLAND AVE.
m m
SALEM, MA.
RAYMOND ym�,`
P. PLOT PLAN PROFI LE
i McMANUS SCALE I"= 40' H O R. I"=20'
No.FCISTE9234O VERT I�� =2�
9
- � Q'�
40N? SItRVE��q
MAY 1985
`07 LANDMARK ENGINEERING a
SURVEYING INC_
LYNN, MA.
to
�e
O
O
\o1e
F
i +
,
I
O
O
i N C
I
�s
o
0 01
(07- 176) N ��.
SALEM PLANNING BOARD
N
k (99
I H co
O
CL
DATE
3 �
1 �
49, 350. 56 S. F.
O
o
o m (Z91,6) N
co 00 o
a: C I O o r
o I po co —
c v Ii !
p O O `
o \ V
L V't,+6)
O
LL
CL
;S
\ (06 £6) — aj
N
3
0
tuawaAod pu3
NOTE : Benchmark =100.00 Assumed.
I Proposed Elevations ( )
c
oo' 87.3 yj( zc
cd (Top Found.=X6.00)
N N OF ~ c
I Proposed i 90.2 F
w i, _'+ 89'Z8 = 'AUI p u' 0 90.3+ I c,
--� _ — 09'Z6 =w'8 x n w + Foundation I o'_---._
f.
LL — L — w i CLA IK Ave
r � S
(Inv 87.0
87.0 )3 0.0 4.3 91.1
tr O 3, 9 /h Xw r r
> o O i a
i o p O
.CvCUS
10Oo -
To' - n; -Existing S.M.H�
_ , - 4t " - =--" f Rim=92.601 N. %. S.
m. : Limit of Road Improvement, �^
Inv.=82.68
mo --
P rapased .5
CLARK AVE. � +�Sr, r
PROPOSED PLOT PLAN & PROFILE
in' '• — 'c' i f
IN
SALEM, MA.
to o o
FOR
a, m � Co � s NICHOLAS P. FIORE JR. 469 HIGHLAND AVE.
l > SALEM, MA.
``N OF M4,p
RAYMOND y�N PLOT PLAN PRO F I LE
o P.
MCMANUS SCALE ["= 40' H O R. I"=20'
No. 9234
CISTEPE �+ I
9F
o VERT. I =2
�q+v Si,avty°P MAY 1985
LANDMARK ENGINEERING a
SURVEYING INC. _
--- LYNN, MA.