The URL can be used to link to this page

FOREST RIVER PARK - ZONINGr 1 LEC UU � UU U�" Li � � U " WUUU " U " LA0-uU u " n 1 1 1 1 Environmental Notification Form 1 June 15, 2017 1 1 Proposed Proiect Forest River Park Seawall Repair Project Forest River Park 1 Salem, Massachusetts 1 1 Applicant David Knowlton, City Engineer 1 City of Salem 93 Washington Street Salem, MA 01970 1 ' LEC Environmental Consultants, Inc. 1 12 Resnik Road, Suite 1 Plymouth, MA 02360 1 508-746-9491 508-746-9492 fax 1 www.lecenvironmental.com 1 I PLYMOUTH,MA WAKEFIELD,MA WORCESTER,MA RINDGE,NH ' nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn LEC U1J ULi U ►J11•ti ►1 ti rI lIUU U 1111 U ti ll UYJ U U IIi lI YJ Li ' June 15,2017 ' Hand Delivery Mr.Matthew A. Beaton, Secretary ' Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs Attn: MEPA Office 100 Cambridge Street, Suite 900 ' Boston, MA 02114 RE: Environmental Notification Form [LECFilc#: W&C16-259.011 Forest River Park Seawall Repair Project ' Salem, Massachusetts Dear SecretaryBeaton: ' On behalf of the Applicant,the City of Salem,LEC Environmental Consultants,Inc., (LEC)filing the enclosed Environmental Notification Form(ENF)and Supplemental Report in accordance with the ' Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act(M.G.L. c 30, s. 61-62H,MEPA)and the MEPA Regulations. (301 CMR 11.00)for the Forest River Park Seawall Repair Project. The project involves replacing the existing seawall with a new seawall structure, replacing an 80-foot section of seawall with a sloped rip- rap revetment,removing the existing beach access ramp and replacing it with new stairs and a new ramp, and repaving the adjacent access road and parking area. Portions of the proposed work will occur within Costal Beach, Salt Marsh, Rocky Intertidal Shore, ' Coastal Bank,Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage(LSCSF), and Land Containing Shellfish. Temporary disturbances to the wetland resource areas will be fully restored upon completion of construction and no permanent disturbances are proposed to any resource areas. The proposed project has been designed to achieve compliance with the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act(M.G.L.c. 131, s. 40), its implementing Regulations(3 10 CMR 10.00),and the City of Salem Wetlands Protection ' Ordinance(Salem Code Chapter 50). Project details are depicted on the attached Department of Public Works Seawall Repair Project Notice of Intent Submittal Plans,prepared by Woodard&Curran, dated May 25,2017. ' In accordance with 301 CMR 11.16,a copy of the ENF Application has been circulated to the required Agencies/Reviewers(refer to distribution list included herein). Notice of environmental review has been sent to the Salem News for publication on or before June 19, 2017, as required at 301 CMR 11.15 (1)of ' the MEPA Regulations. If there are any questions or additional information is needed,please do not hesitate to contact me in our ' Plymouth office at 508-746-9491 or at mmanganello@lecenvironmental.com. Sincerely, LEC Env[ronme tal Consultants, Inc. Mark L. Mangarl4110 -' Assistant Director of Ecological Services cc: Distribution List,Woodard&Curran,City of Salem ' LEC Environmental Consultants,Inc. www.lecenvironmental.com 12 Resnik Road 380 Lowell Street 100 Grove Street P.O.Box 590 Suite 1 Suite 101 Suite 302 Rindge,NH 03461 ' Plymouth,MA 02360 Wakefield,MA 01880 Worcester,MA 01605 508-746-9491 781-245-2500 508-753-3077 603-899-6726 508-746-9492(Fax) 781-245-6677(Fax) 508-753-3177(Fax) 603-899-6726(Fax) PLYMOUTH,MA WAKEFIELD,MA WORCESTER,MA RINDGE,NH LEC' Table of Contents Environmental Notification Form Report Attachments i. Environmental Notification Form ii. Public Notice of Environmental Review Publication iii. Distribution List Supplemental Information Report 1. Introduction I ' 2. General Site Description 1 2.1 Floodplain Designation 3 ' 2.2 Massachusetts Natural Heritage&Endangered Species Program Designation 3 ' 3. Wetland Boundary Determination Methodology 3 4. Wetland Resource Area Descriptions 3 ' 4.1 Bordering Vegetated Wetland 4 4.2 Bank 4 ' 4.3 Coastal Beach 4 4.4 Salt Marsh 5 4.5 Rocky Intertidal Shore 5 4.6 Coastal Bank 5 4.7 Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage 5 4.8 Land Containing Shellfish 6 ' 5. Proposed Project 6 5.1 Alternatives Analysis 8 ' 6. Mitigation Measures 8 6.1 Sedimentation and Erosion Control 8 ' 7. Regulatory Compliance 8 ' 7.1 Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act 9 t PLYMOUTH,MA WAKEFIELD,MA WORCESTER,MA RINDGE,NH LECTable of Contents ' 8. Summary g Literature Referenced Appendices ' Appendix A Locus Maps Figure 1: Aerial Orthophoto Figure 2: FEMA Flood Insurance Map ' Figure 3: USGS Topographic Quadrangle ' Appendix B Department of Public Works Seawall Repair Project Notice of Intent Submittal Plans, ' prepared by Woodard&Curran, dated May 25,2017. 1 1 t PLYMOUTH,MA WAKEFIELD,MA WORCESTER,MA RINDGE,NH ICommonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs ' Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act (MEPA) Office Environmental Notification Form For Office Use Only EEA#: MEPA Analyst: The information requested on this form must be completed in order to submit a document ' electronically for review under the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act, 301 CMR 11.00. Project Name: Forest River Park Seawall Repair Project ' Street Address: Shore Avenue Municipality: Salem Watershed: North Coastal Drainage Area Universal Transverse Mercator Coordinates: Latitude: 42°30'27.06" N Longitude: 70053'03.82" W Estimated commencement date: 2018 Estimated completion date: 2018 ' Project Type: Shore Protection Status of project design: 100%complete Proponent: City of Salem, Engineering Department Street Address: 120 Washington Street, 4th Floor Municipality: Salem I State: MA Zip Code: 01970 Name of Contact Person: Mark Man anello Firm/Agency: LEC Env. Consultants, Inc. Street Address: 12 Resnik Road, Suite 1 Municipality: Plymouth State: MA Zi Code: 02360 Phone: 508-746-9491 Fax: 508-746-9492 E-mail: mmanganello@ lece nvi ronmental.com Does this project meet or exceed a mandatory EIR threshold (see 301 CMR 11.03)? ❑Yes ®No ' If this is an Expanded Environmental Notification Form (ENF) (see 301 CMR 11.05(7))or a Notice of Project Change (NPC), are you requesting: ' a Single EIR? (see 301 CMR 11.06(8)) ❑Yes [:]No a Special Review Procedure? (see 301CMR 11.09) ❑Yes [:]No ' a Waiver of mandatory EIR? (see 301 CMR 11.11) ❑Yes ❑No a Phase I Waiver? (see 301 CMR 11.11) ❑Yes ❑No (Note: Greenhouse Gas Emissions analysis must be included in the Expanded ENP) Which MEPA review threshold(s) does the project meet or exceed (see 301 CMR 11.03)? Wetlands, Waterways and Tidelands— 11.03(3)(b)(1)(a) and 11.03(3)(b)(6) Which State Agency Permits will the project require? Wetlands Order of Conditions, Water Quality Certification and Ch. 91 License Identify any financial assistance or land transfer from an Agency of the Commonwealth, including the Agency name and the amount of funding or land area in acres: Executive Office of Energy & Environmental Affairs Dam & Seawall Repair& Removal Program (grant) : $143.625.00 ' 1 1 ' Summary of Project Size Existing Change Total & Environmental Impacts t � � Total site acreage 0.50 acres New acres of land altered Acres of impervious area 0.15 acres None 0.15 acres Square feet of new bordering vegetated wetlands alteration NA Square feet of new other wetland -5,096 sq. ft. alteration -521 In ft. Coastal Bank Acres of new non-water dependent use of tidelands or waterways 0 Gross square footage 1560 sq.ft. 340 sq.ft. 1900 sq. ft. Number of housing units NA NA NA Maximum height (feet) Current minimum Proposed continuous Maximum alteration existing elevation: elevation of 9.5(not to of.36 ' Height of seawall can vary with tidal 9.14 exceed five feet tall) function TRANSPORTATION Vehicle trips per day NA NA NA Parking spaces NA NA NA WASTEWATER Water Use (Gallons per day) NA NA NA Water withdrawal (GPD) NA NA NA Wastewater generation/treatment NA NA NA (GPD) Length of water mains (miles) NA NA NA ' Length of sewer mains (miles) NA NA NA Has this project been filed with MEPA before? ® Yes (EEA# ) ®No Has any project on this site been filed with MEPA before? ' ® Yes (EEA# 15234 ) ❑No -2- GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION – all proponents must fill out this section PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ' Describe the existing conditions and land uses on the project site: See description of existing conditions in the attached Report. 1 Describe the proposed project and its programmatic and physical elements: See description of the proposed project in the attached Report. NOTE: The project description should summarize both the project's direct and indirect impacts (including construction period impacts) in terms of their magnitude, geographic extent, duration and frequency, and reversibility, as applicable. It should also discuss the infrastructure requirements of the project and the capacity of the municipal and/or regional infrastructure to sustain these requirements into the future. Describe the on-site project alternatives (and alternative off-site locations, if applicable), considered by the proponent, including at least one feasible alternative that is allowed under current zoning, and the reasons(s)that they were not selected as the preferred alternative: NOTE: The purpose of the alternatives analysis is to consider what effect changing the parameters and/or siting of a project, or components thereof, will have on the environment, keeping in mind that the objective of the MEPA review process is to avoid or minimize damage to the environment to the greatest extent feasible. Examples of alternative projects include alternative site locations, alternative site uses, and alternative site configurations. See description of alternatives in the attached Report. Summarize the mitigation measures proposed to offset the impacts of the preferred alternative: All proposed impacts to Coastal Resource Areas are temporary and full restoration within each individual resource will be implemented upon completion of construction. Also, temporary ' sheet piling is proposed to protect the adjacent resource areas from non-permitted disturbance. See description of the proposed project for full description of proposed restoration in the attached Report. ' If the project is proposed to be constructed in phases, please describe each phase: See description of the proposed project in the attached Report. AREAS OF CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN: Is the project within or adjacent to an Area of Critical Environmental Concern? ❑Yes(Specify ) ' ®No — if yes, does the ACEC have an approved Resource Management Plan?—Yes No; If yes, describe how the project complies with this plan. -3- Will there be stormwater runoff or discharge to the designated ACEC?_Yes_No; If yes, describe and assess the potential impacts of such stormwater runoff/discharge to the designated ACEC. ' RARE SPECIES: Does the project site include Estimated and/or Priority Habitat of State-Listed Rare Species? (see http://www.mass.gov/dfwele/dfw/nhesp/regulatory_review/priority_habitat/priority_habitat_home.htm) ❑Yes (Specify ) ®No HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Does the project site include any structure, site or district listed in the State Register of Historic Place or the inventory of Historic and Archaeological Assets of the Commonwealth? ❑Yes(Specify ) ®No If yes, does the project involve any demolition or destruction of any listed or inventoried historic or archaeological resources? ❑Yes (Specify 1 ❑No WATER RESOURCES: Is there an Outstanding Resource Water(ORW)on or within a half-mile radius of the project site?—Yes X No; if yes, identify the ORW and its location. North Coast Drainage Area, Salem Harbor (SB) shellfishing (NOTE: Outstanding Resource Waters include Class A public water supplies, their tributaries, and bordering wetlands; active and inactive reservoirs approved by MassDEP;certain waters within Areas of Critical Environmental Concern, and certified vernal pools. Outstanding resource waters are listed in the Surface Water Quality Standards, 314 CMR 4.00.) Are there any impaired water bodies on or within a half-mile radius of the project site? X Yes No; if yes, identify the water body and pollutant(s)causing the impairment: Salem Harbor(Cat. 5) MMA93-54_2012. Estuarine bioassessments,fecal coliform Is the project within a medium or high stress basin, as established by the Massachusetts Water Resources Commission?_Yes X No STORMWATER MANAGEMENT: ' Generally, describe the project's stormwater impacts and measures that the project will take to comply with the standards found in MassDEP's Stormwater Management Regulations: The proposed project is classified as a redevelopment project and therefore must meet the following Stormwater Management Standards only to the maximum extent practicable: Standard 2, Standard 3, and the pretreatment and structural stormwater best management practice requirements of Standards 4, 5, and 6. Existing stormwater discharges shall comply with Standard 1 only to the maximum extent practicable. A redevelopment project shall also comply with all other requirements of the Stormwater Management Standards and improve existing conditions. The following summary of the Stormwater Management Standards and the project's compliance with the standards has been prepared for review: Standard 1:No new stormwater conveyances(e.g. outfalls)may discharge untreated stormwater directly to or cause erosion in wetlands or waters of the Commonwealth: The proposed project does not include new discharges of untreated stormwater directly to or cause erosion in wetlands or water of the Commonwealth. Therefore, this standard is met. Standard 2: Stormwater management systems shall be designed so that the post-development peak discharge rates do not exceed pre-development peak discharge rates: The proposed project does not include any new stormwater systems; the post-development peak discharge rates do not exceed the pre-development peak discharge rates. Therefore, this standard is met. Standard 3:Loss of annual recharge to groundwater shall be eliminated or minimized through the use of environmentally sensitive site design, low impact development techniques, stormwater best management practices, and good operation and maintenance. At a minimum, the annual recharge from the post-development site shall approximate the annual recharge from pre-development conditions based on soil type. This Standard is met when the stormwater management system is designed to infiltrate the required recharge volume as determined in accordance with the Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook: -4- ' The proposed project will remove approximately 233 square feet of impervious material, and the proposed sea wallwill be placed in the existing sea wall's location. The annual recharge from the post-development site will have thesame annual recharge from the pre-development conditions. Therefore, this standard is met. ' Standard 4: For new development, stormwater management systems must be designed to remove 80% of the average annual load(post-development conditions) of Total Suspended Solids(TSS). It is presumed that this standard is met when: A. Suitable nonstructural practices for source control and pollution prevention are identified in a Long Term Pollution Prevention Plan, and thereafter and are implemented and maintained; B. Structural stormwater management best management practices(BMP's) are sized to capture the required water quality volume determined in accordance with the Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook; C. Pre-treatment is provided in accordance with the Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook Stormwater management systems shall be designed to remove 80% of the average annual post-construction load of Total Suspended Solids(TSS). As previously stated, the project is considered a Redevelopment Project.The proposed project will remove 233 square feet of impervious material, and the proposed sea wall will be placed in the existing sea wall's location. Therefore, this standard is met. Standard 5:For land uses with higher potential pollutant loads, source control and pollution prevention shall be implemented in accordance with the Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook to eliminate or reduce the discharge of stormwater runoff from such land uses to the maximum extent practicable: The site is not considered a land with higher potential pollutant loads.Therefore, Standard 5 is not applicable. 1 Standard 6:Stormwater discharges within the Zone II or Interim Wellhead Protection Area of a public water supply and stormwater discharges near or to any other critical area require the use of the specific source control andpollution prevention measures and the specific structural stormwater best management practices determined by the Department to be suitable for managing discharges to such areas, as provided in the Massachusetts ' Stormwater Handbook. A discharge is near a critical area if there is a strong likelihood of a significant impact occurring to said area, taking into account site-specific factors: The site does not contain discharges within the areas specified above. Therefore, Standard 6 is not applicable. Standard 7:A redevelopment project is required to meet the following Stormwater Management Standards only to the maximum extent practicable: Standard Z Standard 3, and the pretreatment and structural stormwater best management practice requirements of Standards 4, 5, and 6. Existing stormwater discharges shall comply with Standard 1 only to the maximum extent practicable.A redevelopment project shall also comply with all other ' requirements of the Stormwater Management Standards and improve existing conditions: The proposed project is considered a redevelopment project. Therefore, this standard is met. Standard 8:A plan to control construction-related impacts, including erosion, sedimentation, and other pollutant sources during construction and land disturbance activities(construction period erosion, sedimentation, and ' pollution prevention plan) shall be developed and implemented: Erosion control practices have been illustrated in the plan set. However, the proposed project is considered a redevelopment project.Therefore, Standard 8 is not applicable. ' Standard 9:A Long-Term Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Plan shall be developed and implemented to ensure that stormwater management systems function as designed: The proposed project is considered a redevelopment project. Therefore, Standard 9 is not applicable. Standard 10:All illicit discharges to the stormwater management system are prohibited: ' There are no known or suspected illicit discharges to the proposed drainage collection system. However, the proposed project is considered a redevelopment project. Therefore, Standard 10 is not applicable. An erosion and sediment control program will minimize the risk of impacts to wetland resource areas during construction of the project. The program incorporates Best Management Practices(BMPs) specified in the guidelines developed by the DEP and United States Environmental Protection Agency(EPA). These measures include the installation of temporary erosion and sediment controls. Areas of exposed soil will be kept to a minimum, and permanent vegetative cover(or binder coat of pavement)will be established after final grading or as soon as practicable. Erosion and sediment control measures proposed for site preparation and development phases will include compost filter tubes and steel sheet piling. MASSACHUSETTS CONTINGENCY PLAN: Has the project site been, or is it currently being, regulated under M.G.L.c.21 E or the Massachusetts Contingency Plan? Yes_ No X ; if yes, please describe the current status of the site(including Release Tracking Number i (RTN), cleanup phase, and Response Action Outcome classification): ' Is there an Activity and Use Limitation (AUL)on any portion of the project site?Yes_No X -5- if yes, describe which portion of the site and how the project will be consistent with the AUL: Are you aware of any Reportable Conditions at the property that have not yet been assigned an RTN? Yes No X ; if yes, please describe: SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTE: If the project will generate solid waste during demolition or construction, describe alternatives considered for re-use, recycling, and disposal of, e.g., asphalt, brick, concrete, gypsum, metal, wood:Asphalt and concrete will be managed in accordance with 310 CMR 19.017. The alternatives considered for re-use, recycling, and disposal of concrete will undergo further analysis during contractual bidding of the construction associated with the seawall reconstruction. (NOTE:Asphalt pavement, brick, concrete and metal are banned from disposal at Massachusetts landfills and waste combustion facilities and wood is banned from disposal at Massachusetts landfills. See 310 CMR 19.017 for the complete list of banned materials.) Will your project disturb asbestos containing materials?Yes —No X ; if yes, please consult state asbestos requirements at http://mass.gov/ aassDEP/air/asbhom0l htm Describe anti-idling and other measures to limit emissions from construction equipment:An anti-idling requirement will be incorporated into the Specifications and the field engineer will work with the contractor to minimize the ' emissions from construction equipment. Not Applicable ' DESIGNATED WILD AND SCENIC RIVER: Is this project site located wholly or partially within a defined river corridor of a federally designated Wild and Scenic River or a state designated Scenic River?Yes_No X ; if yes, specify name of river and designation: If yes, does the project have the potential to impact any of the"outstandingly remarkable" resources of a federally Wild and Scenic River or the stated purpose of a state designated Scenic River? Yes _No ; if yes, specify name of river and designation: If yes, will the project will result in any impacts to any of the designated"outstandingly remarkable" resources of the Wild and Scenic River or the stated purposes of a Scenic River. Yes _No _ if yes,describe the potential impacts to one or more of the"outstandingly remarkable" resources or 1 stated purposes and mitigation measures proposed. r -6- ATTACHMENTS: 1. List of all attachments to this document. 2. U.S.G.S. map(good quality color copy, 8-'%x 11 inches or larger, at a scale of 1:24,000) indicating the project location and boundaries. I. Plan, at an appropriate scale, of existing conditions on the project site and its immediate environs, showing all known structures, roadways and parking lots, railroad rights-of-way, wetlands and water bodies, wooded areas,farmland, steep slopes, public open spaces, and major utilities. 4 Plan, at an appropriate scale, depicting environmental constraints on or adjacent to the project site such as Priority and/or Estimated Habitat of state-listed rare species, Areas of Critical Environmental Concern, Chapter 91 jurisdictional areas, Article 97 lands, wetland resource area delineations, water supply protection areas, and historic resources and/or districts. 5. Plan, at an appropriate scale, of proposed conditions upon completion of project(if construction of the project is proposed to be phased, there should be a site plan showing conditions upon the completion of each phase). 6. List of all agencies and persons to whom the proponent circulated the ENF, in accordance ' with 301 CMR 11.16(2). 7. List of municipal and federal permits and reviews required by the project, as applicable. LAND SECTION — all proponents must fill out this section ' I. Thresholds/Permits A. Does the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to land (see 301 CMR 11.03(1) Yes No X ; if yes, specify each threshold: ' II. Impacts and Permits A. Describe, in acres, the current and proposed character of the project site, as follows: ' Existing Change Total Footprint of buildings na na na Internal roadways na na na Parking and other paved areas 5486 sf. 0 sf. 5486 sf. ' Other altered areas na na na Undeveloped areas na na na Total: Project Site Acreage: 0.50 Acres 1 B. Has any part of the project site been in active agricultural use in the last five years? _Yes X No; if yes, how many acres of land in agricultural use (with prime state or Foe—ally important agricultural soils)will be converted to nonagricultural use? ' C. Is any part of the project site currently or proposed to be in active forestry use? _Yes X No; if yes, please describe current and proposed forestry activities and indicate whether any part of the site is the subject of a forest management plan approved by the Department of Conservation and Recreation: D. Does any part of the project involve conversion of land held for natural resources purposes in accordance with Article 97 of the Amendments to the Constitution of the Commonwealth to any purpose not in accordance with Article 97? Yes X No; if yes, describe: E. Is any part of the project site currently subject to a conservation restriction, preservation restriction, agricultural preservation restriction or watershed preservation restriction?_ Yes X No; if yes, does the project involve the release or modification of such restriction? Yes X No; if yes, describe: F. Does the project require approval of a new urban redevelopment project or a fundamental change in an existing urban redevelopment project under M.G.L.c.121A? _Yes X No; if yes, describe: G. Does the project require approval of a new urban renewal plan or a major modification of an existing urban renewal plan under M.G.L.c.121 B?Yes_No-1-,, if yes, describe: III. Consistency A. Identify the current municipal comprehensive land use plan Title: City of Salem Master Plan and Update Plan Date 1996 rB. Describe the project's consistency with that plan with regard to: 1) economic development: improvement 2) adequacy of infrastructure: improvement 3) open space impacts: Not applicable 4) compatibility with adjacent land uses: consistent C. Identify the current Regional Policy Plan of the applicable Regional Planning Agency(RPA) RPA: Metropolitan Area Planning Council ITitle: Metro Futures Date: 2005 -g- D. Describe the project's consistency with that plan with regard to: ' 1) economic development: improvement 2) adequacy of infrastructure: improvement 3) open space impacts: Not applicable ' RARE SPECIES SECTION I. Thresholds/Permits A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to rare species or habitat(see 301 CMR 11.03(2))? —Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: (NOTE:If you are uncertain, it is recommended that you consult with the Natural Heritage and ' Endangered Species Program (NHESP)prior to submitting the ENF.) B. Does the project require any state permits related to rare species or habitat? _Yes X No i C. Does the project site fall within mapped rare species habitat(Priority or Estimated Habitat?) in the ■ current Massachusetts Natural Heritage Atlas(attach relevant page)? Yes X No. See Attachment I. D. If you answered "No"to all questions A, B and C, proceed to the Wetlands, Waterways, and Tidelands Section. If you answered "Yes"to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Rare Species section below. IL Impacts and Permits A. Does the project site fall within Priority or Estimated Habitat in the current Massachusetts Natural ' Heritage Atlas (attach relevant page)? _Yes X No. If yes, 1. Have you consulted with the Division of Fisheries and Wildlife Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program (NHESP)? _Yes No; if yes, have you received a determination as to whether the project will result in the"take" of a rare species? _ Yes No; if yes, attach the letter of determination to this submission. 2. Will the project"take"an endangered, threatened, and/or species of special concern in accordance with M.G.L. c.131A(see also 321 CMR 10.04)? _Yes_No; if yes, provide a summary of proposed measures to minimize and mitigate rare species impacts 3. Which rare species are known to occur within the Priority or Estimated Habitat? ' 4. Has the site been surveyed for rare species in accordance with the Massachusetts Endangered Species Act? _Yes—No 4. If your project is within Estimated Habitat, have you filed a Notice of Intent or received an Order of Conditions for this project? _Yes_No; if yes, did you send a copy of the Notice of Intent to the Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program, in accordance with the Wetlands Protection Act regulations? _Yes_No ' B. Will the project"take"an endangered, threatened, and/or species of special concern in accordance with M.G.L. c.131A(see also 321 CMR 10.04)? Yes X No; if yes, provide a summary of proposed measures to minimize and mitigate impacts to significant habitat: -9- WETLANDS. WATERWAYS, AND TIDELANDS SECTION I. Thresholds I Permits A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to wetlands,waterways, and tidelands (see 301 CMR 11.03(3))? X Yes No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: 11.03(3) (b)(1)(a)and 11.03(3) (b)(6)requires a Ch. 91 license. ' B. Does the project require any state permits(or a local Order of Conditions)related to wetlands, waterways, or tidelands? X Yes_No; if yes, specify which permit: Local Order of Conditions, state Ch. 91 and WQC. C. If you answered "No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Water Supply Section. If you answered "Yes"to either question A or question B,fill out the remainder of the Wetlands, Waterways, and Tidelands Section below. ' II.Wetlands Impacts and Permits A. Does the project require a new or amended Order of Conditions under the Wetlands Protection Act(M.G.L. c.131A)? X Yes_No; if yes, has a Notice of Intent been filed? X Yes_No; ' if yes, list the date and MassDEP file number: na ; if yes, has a local Order of Conditions been issued? Yes X No;Was the Order of Conditions appealed? Yes No. Will the project require a Variance from the Wetlands regulations?_Yes X No. ' B. Describe any proposed permanent or temporary impacts to wetland resource areas located on the project site: ' See section C: all proposed impacts are temporary and will be restored, "in kind" upon completion of construction. See the attached Report for additional information. C. Estimate the extent and type of impact that the project will have on wetland resources, and ' indicate whether the impacts are temporary or permanent: Coastal Wetlands Area(square feet)or Temporary or ' Length (linear feet) Permanent Impact? Land Under the Ocean Designated Port Areas Coastal Beaches 4.363 sq.ft temporary Coastal Dunes Barrier Beaches Coastal Banks 521 lin.ft. _ temporary Rocky Intertidal Shores 526 sa.ft. temporary Salt Marshes 207 sq.ft. _temporary ' Land Under Salt Ponds Land Containing Shellfish 5.096 sq.ft. temporary Fish Runs Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage 20.225 sg.ft. temporary ' Inland Wetlands Bank(If) Bordering Vegetated Wetlands Isolated Vegetated Wetlands Land under Water Isolated Land Subject to Flooding Bordering Land Subject to Flooding ' Riverfront Area ' D. Is any part of the project: 1. proposed as a limited project? X Yes_No; if yes, what is the area (in sf)? Entirety of project-0.50 Acres ' 2. the construction or alteration of a dam? _Yes X No; if yes, describe: 3. fill or structure in a velocity zone or regulatory floodway? X YesNo 4. dredging or disposal of dredged material? X Yes_No; if yes, descri_be the volume ' of dredged material and the proposed disposal site: Approximately 1,852.4 cys of dredged soil which will be returned to the excavation site upon completion as part of restoration. 5. a discharge to an Outstanding Resource Water(ORW)or an Area of Critical Environmental Concern (ACEC)?Yes X No ' 6. subject to a wetlands restriction order? _Yes-2L No; if yes, identify the area (in sf): 7. located in buffer zones? _Yes No; if yes, how much (in sf) E. Will the project: ' 1. be subject to a local wetlands ordinance or bylaw? X Yes_No 2. alter any federally-protected wetlands not regulated under state law? Yes X No; if yes, what is the area (sf)? ' III.Waterways and Tidelands Impacts and Permits A. Does the project site contain waterways or tidelands(including filled former tidelands)that are subject to the Waterways Act, M.G.L.c.91? X Yes_No; if yes, is there a current Chapter 91 License or Permit affecting the project site? X Yes_No; if yes, list the date and license or permit number and provide a copy of the historic map used to determine extent of filled tidelands: 1901, license no. 3241. C. Does the project require a new or modified license or permit under M.G.L.c.91? X Yes_No; if yes, how many acres of the project site subject to M.G.L.c.91 will be for non-water-dependent ' use? Current g Change g Total g If yes, how many square feet of solid fill or pile-supported structures (in sf)?: 1900 sq.ft.. C. For non-water-dependent use projects, indicate the following: Area of filled tidelands on the site: Area of filled tidelands covered by buildings: For portions of site on filled tidelands, list ground floor uses and area of each use: Does the project include new non-water-dependent uses located over flowed tidelands? Yes_No_ ' Height of building on filled tidelands Also show the following on a site plan: Mean High Water, Mean Low Water, Water- dependent Use Zone, location of uses within buildings on tidelands, and interior and exterior areas and facilities dedicated for public use, and historic high and historic low water marks. ' D. Is the project located on landlocked tidelands? _Yes X No; if yes, describe the project's impact on the public's right to access, use and enjoy jurisdictional tidelands and describe measures the project will implement to avoid, minimize or mitigate any adverse impact: 1 E. Is the project located in an area where low groundwater levels have been identified by a municipality or by a state or federal agency as a threat to building foundations?_Yes X No; if yes, describe the project's impact on groundwater levels and describe measures the project will implement to avoid, minimize or mitigate any adverse impact: ' F. Is the project non-water-dependent and located on landlocked tidelands or waterways or tidelands subject to the Waterways Act and subject to a mandatory EIR?_Yes X No; (NOTE: If yes, then the project will be subject to Public Benefit Review and ' Determination.) G. Does the project include dredging? X Yes_No; if yes, answer the following questions: ' What type of dredging? Improvement_ Maintenance Both What is the proposed dredge volume, in cubic yards: 1,852.4 cys What is the proposed dredge footprint 521 length (ft) 12 width (ft) 8 depth (ft); Will dredging impact the following resource areas? Intertidal Yes X No ; if yes, 5.096 sq ft Outstanding Resource Waters Yes No X ; if Other resource area(i.e. shellfish beds, eel grass beds) Yes X No ; if yes: ' 5,096 sq.ft. If yes to any of the above, have you evaluated appropriate and practicable steps to: 1)avoidance; 2) if avoidance is not possible, minimization; 3) if either avoidance or minimize is not possible, mitigation? ' See alternatives in attached report ' If no to any of the above, what information or documentation was used to support this determination? Provide a comprehensive analysis of practicable alternatives for improvement dredging in accordance with 314 CMR 9.07(1)(b). Physical and chemical data of the sediment shall be included in the comprehensive analysis. See attached report for supplemental information. Sediment Characterization Existing gradation analysis results? _Yes X No: if yes, provide results. Existing chemical results for parameters listed in 314 CMR 9.07(2)(b)6?_Yes ' X No; if yes, provide results. Do you have sufficient information to evaluate feasibility of the following management options for dredged sediment? If yes, check the appropriate option. Not applicable 1 Beach Nourishment: Unconfined Ocean Disposal Confined Disposal: Confined Aquatic Disposal (CAD)_ Confined Disposal Facility(CDF)_ Landfill Reuse in accordance with COMM-97-001 _ ' Shoreline Placement Upland Material Reuse_ In-State landfill disposal_ Out-of-state landfill disposal (NOTE: This information is required for a 401 Water Quality Certification.) IV. Consistency: ' A. Does the project have effects on the coastal resources or uses, and/or is the project located within the Coastal Zone? X Yes No; if yes, describe these effects and the projects consistency r2- with the policies of the Office of Coastal Zone Management: Details regarding CZM consistencies and policies will be provided under separate cover. B. Is the project located within an area subject to a Municipal Harbor Plan? _Yes X No; if yes, ' identify the Municipal Harbor Plan and describe the project's consistency with that plan: ' WATER SUPPLY SECTION ' I. Thresholds I Permits A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to water supply(see 301 CMR 11.03(4))? _Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to water supply? _Yes X No; if yes, specify which permit: ' C. If you answered "No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Wastewater Section. If you answered "Yes"to either question A or question B,fill out the remainder of the Water Supply Section below. II. Impacts and Permits A. Describe, in gallons per day(gpd), the volume and source of water use for existing and proposed activities at the project site: ' Existing Change Total Municipal or regional water supply Withdrawal from groundwater Withdrawal from surface water Interbasin transfer (NOTE., Interbasin Transfer approval will be required if the basin and community where the proposed ' water supply source is located is different from the basin and community where the wastewater from the source will be discharged.) B. If the source is a municipal or regional supply, has the municipality or region indicated that there ' is adequate capacity in the system to accommodate the project?_Yes_No C. If the project involves a new or expanded withdrawal from a groundwater or surface water ' source, has a pumping test been conducted? —Yes_No; if yes, attach a map of the drilling sites and a summary of the alternatives considered and the results. D. What is the currently permitted withdrawal at the proposed water supply source(in gallons per day)? Will the project require an increase in that withdrawal?_Yes _No; if yes, then how much of an increase (gpd)? ' E. Does the project site currently contain a water supply well, a drinking water treatment facility, water main, or other water supply facility, or will the project involve construction of a new facility? Yes_No. If yes, describe existing and proposed water supply facilities at the project site: Permitted Existing Avg Proiect Flow Total Flow Daily Flow Capacity of water supply well(s) (gpd) Capacity of water treatment plant(gpd) - 13- ' F. If the project involves a new interbasin transfer of water, which basins are involved, what is the direction of the transfer, and is the interbasin transfer existing or proposed? G. Does the project involve: 1. new water service by the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority or other agency of the Commonwealth to a municipality or water district? _Yes_No 2. a Watershed Protection Act variance? Yes No; if yes, how many acres of alteration? 3. a non-bridged stream crossing 1,000 or less feet upstream of a public surface drinking ' water supply for purpose of forest harvesting activities? _Yes_No III. Consistency Describe the project's consistency with water conservation plans or other plans to enhance water resources, quality, facilities and services: 1 - 14- WASTEWATER SECTION I. Thresholds/Permits A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to wastewater(see 301 CMR ' 11.03(5))? Yes X ; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to wastewater? _Yes X No; if yes, specify which permit: C. If you answered "No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Transportation --Traffic Generation Section. If you answered "Yes"to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Wastewater Section below. IL Impacts and Permits ' A. Describe the volume(in gallons per day)and type of disposal of wastewater generation for existing and proposed activities at the project site (calculate according to 310 CMR 15.00 for septic systems or 314 CMR 7.00 for sewer systems): Existing Change Total ' Discharge of sanitary wastewater Discharge of industrial wastewater TOTAL ' Existing Change Total Discharge to groundwater Discharge to outstanding resource water ' Discharge to surface water Discharge to municipal or regional wastewater facility TOTAL ' B. Is the existing collection system at or near its capacity? _Yes_No; if yes, then describe the measures to be undertaken to accommodate the project's wastewater flows: C. Is the existing wastewater disposal facility at or near its permitted capacity?_Yes_No; if yes, then describe the measures to be undertaken to accommodate the project's wastewater flows: D. Does the project site currently contain a wastewater treatment facility, sewer main, or other ' wastewater disposal facility, or will the project involve construction of a new facility? _Yes No; if yes, describe as follows: Permitted Existing Avg Proiect Flow Total Daily Flow Wastewater treatment plant capacity (in gallons per day) E. If the project requires an interbasin transfer of wastewater, which basins are involved, what is the direction of the transfer, and is the interbasin transfer existing or new? - 15- ' (NOTE:Interbasin Transfer approval may be needed if the basin and community where wastewater will be discharged is different from the basin and community where the source of water supply is ' located.) F. Does the project involve new sewer service by the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority (MWRA)or other Agency of the Commonwealth to a municipality or sewer district? _Yes_No G. Is there an existing facility, or is a new facility proposed at the project site for the storage, treatment, processing, combustion or disposal of sewage sludge, sludge ash, grit, screenings, wastewater reuse(gray water)or other sewage residual materials? _Yes_No; if yes, what is ' the capacity(tons per day): Existing Change Total Storage ' Treatment Processing Combustion ' Disposal H. Describe the water conservation measures to be undertaken by the project, and other wastewater mitigation, such as infiltration and inflow removal. ' III. Consistency A. Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with applicable state, regional, and local plans and policies related to wastewater management: B. If the project requires a sewer extension permit, is that extension included in a comprehensive wastewater management plan? _Yes_No; if yes, indicate the EEA number for the plan ' and whether the project site is within a sewer service area recommended or approved in that plan: ' TRANSPORTATION SECTION (TRAFFIC GENERATION) ' I. Thresholds I Permit A.Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to traffic generation (see 301 CMR 11.03(6))? Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: ' B. Does the project require any state permits related to state-controlled roadways?_Yes X No; if yes, specify which permit: ' C. If you answered "No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Roadways and Other Transportation Facilities Section. If you answered "Yes"to either question A or question B,fill out the remainder of the Traffic Generation Section below. ' II.Traffic Impacts and Permits A. Describe existing and proposed vehicular traffic generated by activities at the project site: Existing Change Total Number of parking spaces Number of vehicle trips per day ITE Land Use Code(s): - 16- ' B. What is the estimated average daily traffic on roadways serving the site? Roadway Existing Chance Total ' 1 2. 3. C. If applicable, describe proposed mitigation measures on state-controlled roadways that the project proponent will implement: D. How will the project implement and/or promote the use of transit, pedestrian and bicycle facilities and services to provide access to and from the project site? C. Is there a Transportation Management Association (TMA)that provides transportation demand management(TDM)services in the area of the project site? _Yes_No; if yes, describe if and how will the project will participate in the TMA: ' D. Will the project use(or occur in the immediate vicinity of)water, rail, or air transportation facilities?—Yes No; if yes, generally describe: ' E. If the project will penetrate approach airspace of a nearby airport, has the proponent filed a Massachusetts Aeronautics Commission Airspace Review Form (780 CMR 111.7)and a Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) (CFR Title 14 Part 77.13, forms 7460-1 and 7460-2)? III. Consistency Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with municipal, regional, state, and federal plans and policies related to traffic, transit, pedestrian and bicycle transportation facilities and services: TRANSPORTATION SECTION (ROADWAYS AND OTHER TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES) ' I. Thresholds A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to roadways or other ' transportation facilities (see 301 CMR 11.03(6))? _Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to roadways or other transportation ' facilities? —Yes X No; if yes, specify which permit: C. If you answered "No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Energy Section. If you answered "Yes"to either question A or question B,fill out the remainder of the Roadways Section below. II.Transportation Facility Impacts A. Describe existing and proposed transportation facilities in the immediate vicinity of the project site: B. Will the project involve any 1. Alteration of bank or terrain(in linear feet)? 2. Cutting of living public shade trees(number)? ' 3. Elimination of stone wall (in linear feet)? t7- ' Ill. Consistency--Describe the project's consistency with other federal, state, regional, and local plans and policies related to traffic, transit, pedestrian and bicycle transportation facilities and services, ' including consistency with the applicable regional transportation plan and the Transportation Improvements Plan (TIP), the State Bicycle Plan, and the State Pedestrian Plan: ' ENERGY SECTION I. Thresholds/Permits ' A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to energy(see 301 CMR 11.03(7))? Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to energy? _Yes X No; if yes, specify ' which permit: C. If you answered "No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Air Quality Section. If you answered "Yes"to either question A or question B,fill out the remainder of the Energy Section ' below. ' II. Impacts and Permits A. Describe existing and proposed energy generation and transmission facilities at the project site: Existing Change Total Capacity of electric generating facility(megawatts) Length of fuel line (in miles) Length of transmission lines(in miles) Capacity of transmission lines (in kilovolts) ' B. If the project involves construction or expansion of an electric generating facility, what are: 1. the facility's current and proposed fuel source(s)? 2. the facility's current and proposed cooling source(s)? ' C. If the project involves construction of an electrical transmission line, will it be located on a new, unused, or abandoned right of way?_Yes_No; if yes, please describe: ' D. Describe the project's other impacts on energy facilities and services: III. Consistency ' Describe the project's consistency with state, municipal, regional, and federal plans and policies for enhancing energy facilities and services: AIR QUALITY SECTION I. Thresholds A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to air quality(see 301 CMR 11.03(8))? _Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to air quality? _Yes X No; if yes, specify which permit: C. If you answered "No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Solid and Hazardous Waste Section. If you answered "Yes"to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Air ' Quality Section below. _ fig_ 1 ' II. Impacts and Permits A. Does the project involve construction or modification of a major stationary source(see 310 CMR 7.00, Appendix A)?_Yes_No; if yes, describe existing and proposed emissions (in tons per day)of: ' Existing Chance Total Particulate matter Carbon monoxide Sulfur dioxide Volatile organic compounds Oxides of nitrogen Lead Any hazardous air pollutant Carbon dioxide ' B. Describe the project's other impacts on air resources and air quality, including noise impacts: III. Consistency ' A. Describe the project's consistency with the State Implementation Plan: B. Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with other federal, state, regional, and local plans and policies related to air resources and air quality: 1 SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION ' I. Thresholds/Permits A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to solid or hazardous waste(see 301 CMR 11.03(9))? —Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to solid and hazardous waste? Yes X No; if yes, specify which permit: C. If you answered "No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Historical and Archaeological Resources Section. If you answered "Yes"to either question A or question B,fill out the remainder of the Solid and Hazardous Waste Section below. II. Impacts and Permits A. Is there any current or proposed facility at the project site for the storage, treatment, processing, combustion or disposal of solid waste?_Yes X No; if yes, what is the volume(in tons per day) of the capacity: Existing Chance Total Storage Treatment, processing Combustion Disposal ' B. Is there any current or proposed facility at the project site for the storage, recycling, treatment or disposal of hazardous waste?_Yes X No; if yes, what is the volume (in tons or gallons per day) of the capacity: ' Existing Chance Total Storage ' Recycling 19 1 ' Treatment Disposal ' C. If the project will generate solid waste(for example, during demolition or construction), describe alternatives considered for re-use, recycling, and disposal: ' D. If the project involves demolition, do any buildings to be demolished contain asbestos? Yes X No ' E. Describe the project's other solid and hazardous waste impacts(including indirect impacts): ' III. Consistency Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with the State Solid Waste Master Plan: ' HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES SECTION I. Thresholds/Impacts ' A. Have you consulted with the Massachusetts Historical Commission? Yes X No; rf yes, attach correspondence. For project sites involving lands under water, have—you consulted with the Massachusetts Board of Underwater Archaeological Resources?_Yes X No; if yes, attach correspondence tB. Is any part of the project site a historic structure, or a structure within a historic district, in either case listed in the State Register of Historic Places or the Inventory of Historic and Archaeological ' Assets of the Commonwealth? _Yes X No; if yes, does the project involve the demolition of all or any exterior part of such historic structure? Yes No; if yes, please describe: C. Is any part of the project site an archaeological site listed in the State Register of Historic Places ' or the Inventory of Historic and Archaeological Assets of the Commonwealth? _Yes, X No; if yes, does the project involve the destruction of all or any part of such archaeological site? Yes No; if yes, please describe: ' D. If you answered "No"to all parts of both questions A, B and C, proceed to the Attachments and Certifications Sections. If you answered "Yes"to any part of either question A or question B,fill out the remainder of the Historical and Archaeological Resources Section below. II. Impacts Describe and assess theproject's impacts, direct and indirect, on listed or inventoried historical cal and ' archaeological resources: ' III. Consistency Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with federal, state, regional, and local plans and policies related to preserving historical and archaeological resources: 1 20 r ' CERTIFICATIONS: 1 The Public Notice of Environmental Review has been/will be published in the following t newspapers in accordance with 301 CMR 11.15(1): (Namej Salem News (— fej 6/19/17 ' 2. This form has been circulated to Agencies and Persons in accordance with 301 CMR 11.16(2). Signatures: bvojt�— ��1(9 DaW Signature bf Responsible Officer Date Signature of petson preparing ' or Proponent ENF (if different from above) David Knowlton Mark L. Manganello ' Name (print or type) Name (print or type) City of Salem LEC Environmental Consultants, Inc. Firm/Agency Firm/Agency _120 W..ashin¢ton.Street -. 12 Resnik__Road Suite 1 Street Street ' Salem MA 01970 _ .,_ vmouLh,�� 02360 Municipality/State/Zip Municipality/State/Zip ' (978)619-5673 (508) 746-9491 Phone Phone ' 21 1 Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Environmental Affairs ' MEPA Office 100 Cambridge St., Suite 900 ' Boston, MA 02114 Telephone 617-626-1020 ' The following should be completed and submitted to a local newspaper: PUBLIC NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ' PROJECT: Forest River Park Seawall Repair Project LOCATION: Forest River Park, Salem, MA tPROPONENT: City of Salem The undersigned is submitting an Environmental Notification Form ("ENF") to the ' Secretary of Environmental Affairs on or before June 15, 2017 ' This will initiate review of the above project pursuant to the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act ("MEPA", M.G.L. c. 30, s.s. 61, 62 62H). Copies of the ENF may be obtained from: ' LEC Environmental Consultants, Inc., 12 Resnik Road, Unit 1, Plymouth MA 02360 508-746-9491 Copies of the ENF are also being sent to the Conservation Commission and Planning Board of Salem where they may be inspected. ' The Secretary of Environmental Affairs will publish notice of the ENF in the Environmental Monitor, will receive public comments on the project for 20 days, and ' will then decide, within ten days, if an environmental Impact Report is needed. A site visit and consultation session on the project may also be scheduled. All persons wishing to comment on the project, or to be notified of a site visit or consultation session, should ' write to the Secretary of Environmental Affairs, 100 Cambridge St., Suite 900, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, Attention: MEPA Office, referencing the above project. By: City of Salem 1 ENF Distribution List: Forest River Park Seawall Repair Project Secretary Matthew A.Beaton Metropolitan Area Planning Council Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs 60 Temple Place/6th floor Attn: MEPA Office Boston,MA 02111 100 Cambridge Street, Suite 900 ' Boston,MA 02114(2 copies) Department of Environmental Protection Salem Planning Board ' Boston Office Salem City Hall Commissioner's Office 93 Washington St One Winter Street Salem, MA 01970 Boston,MA 02108 ' Department of Environmental Protection Salem Board of Health Northeast Regional Office Salem City Hall Attn: MEPA Coordinator 93 Washington St 205B Lowell Street Salem, MA 01970 Wilmington,MA 01887 Massachusetts Department of Transportation Salem Conservation Commission Public/Private Development Unit Salem City Hall 10 Park Plaza 93 Washington St ' Boston,MA 02116 Salem,MA 01970 Massachusetts Department of Transportation Salem City Council ' District#4 Salem City Hall Attn: MEPA Coordinator 93 Washington St 519 Appleton Street Salem, MA 01970 ' Arlington,MA 02476 Massachusetts Historical Commission Coastal Zone Management The MA Archives Building Attn: Project Review Coordinator ' 220 Morrissey.Boulevard - 251 Causeway Street, Suite 800 Boston,MA 02125 Boston,MA 02114 ' Division of Marine Fisheries(North Shore) Attn: Environmental Reviewer 30 Emerson Avenue Gloucester,MA 01930 1 1 LEC 1 1 1. Introduction 1 On behalf of the Applicant,the City of Salem, LEC Environmental Consultants, Inc., (LEC) is filing the enclosed Environmental Notification Form(ENT)and Supplemental Report in accordance with the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act(M.G.L. c 30, s. 1 61-62H,MEPA)and the MEPA Regulations(301 CMR 11.00)for the Forest River Park Seawall Repair Project. The proposed project involves demolition and reconstruction of 1 an approximately sixty(60)year old deteriorating, concrete seawall located along the shoreline to Salem Harbor,within the eastern portion of Forest River Park. The project also involves replacing an 80-foot long segment of the existing wall with a sloped rip-rap ' revetment, repaving the parking area located upgradient of the wall, and construction of a new stairway and ramp to improve safe public access to the beach. Specific project details are depicted on the attached Department of Public Works Seawall Repair Project 1 Notice oflntent Submittal Plans,prepared by Woodard &Curran, dated May 25,2017 (Appendix C). 1 Portions of the proposed work will occur within Coastal Beach, Salt Marsh, Rocky Intertidal Shore, Coastal Bank,Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage(LSCSF)and Land Containing Shellfish. Construction of the new seawall will result in temporary 1 disturbances to the above wetland resource areas; however, the project has been designed to restore each resource area as described herein and therefore,no permanent 1 disturbances are proposed. The wetland boundaries in the vicinity of the project were approved through an Order of Conditions(OOC) issued for the Canal Street Flood Mitigation Project,dated July 22, 1 2015 (DEP File No. 64-596). The project has been designed in the context of the imminent construction of the proposed box culvert extending to the seawall as part of that 1 project. The proposed project was filed with the Salem Conservation Commission on May 26, -2017 as a Limited Project under the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act(M.G.L. c. 1 131, s. 40), its implementing Regulations(3 10 CMR 10.00), and the City of Salem Wetlands Protection Ordinance(Salem Code Chapter 50)as further described herein. 1 The following narrative provides a description of the site,the associated inland and coastal wetland resource areas,proposed activities,and mitigation measures proposed to prevent and/or minimize potential impacts to resource areas and Buffer Zones. 1 1 2. General Site Description Forest River Park is a twenty-nine(29)acre public park shown on Assessor's Map 33 as 1 Lot 743, with a street address of 32 Clifton Avenue(Appendix A,Figure 1). The Park is located at the end of Clifton Avenue and extends to the shoreline of Salem Harbor. The 1 - Page 1 of 9 PLYMOUTH,NLA WAKEFIELD,MA WORCESTER,MA RINDGE,NH 1 LEC 1 seawall associated with this project extends along the shoreline of Salem Harbor and 1 contains a concrete ramp with steel railings for public beach access. The 525-foot long seawall is approximately 5-feet tall when measured from the adjacent seaward land 1 surface,with top of wall elevations varying between 9.0 and 9.5. The seawall is in poor condition and is exhibiting various degree of disrepair, including but not limited to the following: spalling, cracking, extensive cracking and spalling at pipe penetrations, open 1 vertical joints with spalling along the joints and no sealant, surface deterioration, some sections of wall are rotating towards the beach and away from the retained earth at various degrees, there is out-of-plane deflections of sections of wall relative to adjacent 1 walls sections, steel ramp railings have visible corrosion and do not appear to be code compliant, and there is no safety railing on the seawall to protect the public using the walking path on high side from falling down toward the beach. 1 The interior access roadways within Forest River Park extend toward the seawall where several paved parking spaces are used by the public. The pavement extends along the 1 seawall as a 15-foot wide roadway which eventually transitions to a gravel path, upgradient from the northern section of the wall. The existing conditions are depicted on Sheet EX-100 of the Plans. ' Existing wetland resource areas located in the vicinity of the seawall include a Coastal Beach, Rocky Intertidal Shore, Salt Marsh, and Land Containing Shellfish located 1 seaward and adjacent to the wall. The wall itself functions as a Coastal Bank. The entire project footprint is located within Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage. Each of these wetland resource areas are described in detail in Section 4 below. 1 Forest River Park includes recreational fields,park buildings,paved driveways and parking areas, forested uplands, and a small Pond. The main driveway continues east to a 1 parking area situated adjacent to the seawall overlooking Salem Harbor. Between the recreational fields and the seawall, a small man-made Pond exists,with associated Bordering Vegetated Wetlands(BVW)and Bank. To the north of the Pond and seawall, 1 a series of structures and associated appurtenances known as Pioneer Village are located within a forested upland. An 8-foot tall chain-link fence extends around the pond and Pioneer Village,e including ase segment of situated along the seawall on 1 g , g gm g the landward side of the roadway which extends behind the wall. Forested uplands extend around the shoreline of the Pond with the largest contiguous area 1 located on the north side in the vicinity of the Pioneer Village buildings. Vegetation within the adjacent forested upland areas include a moderately dense canopy layer of red 1 oak(Quercus rubra), white oak(Quercus alba),catalpa(Catalpa speciosa), cottonwood (Populus deltoides) and Norway maple(Acer platanoides). The shrub layer is dominated by sapling canopy species,with clusters of raspberry(Rubus spp.), multiflora rose(Rosa 1 multiflora), autumn olive(Elaeagnus umbellate) and privet(Ligustrum vulgare). Groundcover species include patches of Asiatic bittersweet(Celastrus orbiculatus), burdock(Arctium spp.) and scattered tufts of grasses(Family Poaceae). The existing 1 1 Page 2 of 9 PLYMOUTH,MA WAKEFIELD,MA WORCESTER,MA RINDGE,NH 1 LEC 1 Pond contains a fringing BV W,dominated by a conspicuous common reed(Phrogmites 1 australis)marsh, along portions of its northern shoreline. 2.1 Floodplain Designation 1 According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Rate Maps for the Essex County, Massachusetts, (Panel: 25005C077F), dated July 16, 2014, the 1 aforementioned Forest River Park includes an area mapped as Zone AE(el. 11)extending from a Coastal Flood Zone—Areas subject to inundation by the I%annual chance flood, Base Flood Elevations Determined, and Salem Harbor landward to the seawall is mapped 1 as Zone VE(el. 16)—Areas subject to inundation by the I%annual chance flood, Coastal Flood Zone with Velocity Hazard; Base Flood Elevations Determined. A Zone AE(el. 11)extends from the Coastal Flood Zone including the Pond,Pioneer Village, 1 baseball field,basketball field, and a portion of the recreational field(Appendix A,Figure 2) 1 2.2 Massachusetts Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program Designation According to the 131 edition of the Massachusetts Natural Heritage Atlas(effective 1 October 1, 2008) published by the Natural Heritage&Endangered Species Program (NHESP),the project site does not occur within an Estimated Habitat of Rare Wildlife or Priority Habitat of Rare Species. No Certified or Potential Vernal Pools occur within the 1 vicinity of the project site. 3. Wetland Boundary Determination Methodology 1 On July 27, 2012, LEC conducted a site evaluation to identify and characterize existing protectable Inland and Coastal Wetland Resource Areas located on or immediately adjacent to the project footprint within Forest River Park. The boundary of the Bank to ' the Pond, BV W and coastal resource areas were delineated in accordance with the applicable definitions in the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act. The wetland 1 resource area boundaries were approved through the Order of Conditions (OOC) issued for the aforementioned flood mitigation project under DEP File# 64-596. 1 4. Wetland Resource Area Descriptions 1 In accordance with the Act and the Salem Wetlands Protection Ordinance,existing protectable Wetland Resource Areas have been identified and characterized on or immediately adjacent to the project footprint. Portions of the proposed work will occur ' within Coastal Beach; Salt Marsh,Rocky Intertidal Shore, Coastal Bank, Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage (LSCSF) and Land Containing Shellfish, and within the Buffer 1 Zone to BVW and Bank. A brief description of each resource area is provided below. 1 Page 3 of 9 PLYMOUTH,MA WAKEFIELD,MA WORCESTER,MA RINDGE,NH 1 LEC 1 4.1 Bordering Vegetated Wetland ' Bordering Vegetated Wetland(BVW)is defined at 310 CMR 10.55 (2)as freshwater wetlands that border on creeks, rivers, streams,ponds and lakes. The types of freshwater 1 wetlands are wet meadows, marshes, swamps and bogs. Bordering Vegetated Wetlands are areas where the soils are saturated and/or inundated such that they support a predominance of wetland indicator plants. The boundary of Bordering Vegetated 1 Wetland is the line within which 50%or more of the vegetational community consists of wetland indicator plants and saturated or inundated conditions exist. 1 The BVW is associated with the Pond located within the northern portion of Forest River Park. Vegetation within the BVW is dominated by a dense colony of common reed (Phragmites australis). Scattered individuals of mature sugar maple(Acer saccharum), 1 red maple(Acer rubrum)and green ash(Fraxinus pennsylvanica)make up the canopy layer and the shrub layer includes seedlings from the canopy and pussy willow(Salix 1 discolor), red-osier dogwood (Cornus sericea), glossy buckthorn(Rhamnus frangula) and blackberry(Rubus spp.). Patches of Japanese knotweed(Polygonum cuspidatum)are also located on the edge of the BVW in places. ' 4.2 Bank Bank is defined in 310 CMR 10.54 (2)(c)as the first observable break in slope or the 1 mean annual flood level, whichever is lower. The lower boundary of a Bank is the mean annual low flow level. 1 Bank is associated with the aforementioned pond and is essentially coincident with Mean High Water which was estimated in the field based on indicators of high water such as changes in vegetation and staining, as shown on the Plans. The embankments are up to 4 1 feet along the southern shoreline and transition to the BVW system along the northern and eastern shoreline. 1 4.3 Coastal Beach Coastal Beach is defined at 310 CMR 10.27(2)as an unconsolidated sediment subject to wave, tidal and coastal storm action which forms the gently sloping shore of a body of salt water and includes tidal flats. Coastal beaches extend from the mean low water line landward to the dune line, coastal bankline or the seaward edge of existing man-made 1 structures, when these structures replace one of the above lines, whichever is closest to the ocean. 1 Coastal Beach is present immediately south of the aforementioned Rocky Intertidal Shore and extends eastward from the concrete seawall to the Mean Low Water line. The Coastal Beach is primarily comprised of fine to coarse sand with scattered cobbles and ' boulders throughout. 1 Page 4 of 9 PLYMOUTH,MA WAKEFIELD,MA WORCESTER,MA RINDGE,NH 1 LEC 4.4 Salt Marsh ' According to 310 CMR 10.32(2), Salt Marsh means a coastal wetland that extends landward up to the highest high tide line, that is, the highest spring tide of the year, and. ' is characterized by plants that are well adapted to or prefer living in, saline soils. Dominant plants within salt marshes typically include salt meadow cord grass (Spartina ' patens)and/or salt marsh cord grass (Spartina alternii lora), but may also include, without limitation, spike grass (Distichlis spicata), high-tide bush (1va frutescens), black grass (Juncos gerardii), and common reedgrass (Phragmites). A salt marsh may contain ' tidal creeks, ditches and pools. The site contains a small, isolated patch of Salt Marsh within the Rocky Intertidal Shore, consisting primarily of salt marsh cordgrass(Spartina alernii lora). The boundary was determined through visual observations and field survey of the footprint of vegetation. 4.5 Rocky Intertidal Shore ' Rocky Intertidal Shore is defined at 310 CMR 10.31 as naturally occurring rocky areas, such as bedrock or boulder strewn areas between the mean high water line and the mean ' low water line. Rocky Intertidal Shore is present immediately east of the existing concrete seawall and extends seaward to the Mean Low Water line. The Rocky Intertidal Shore is comprised of cobbles and boulders with coarse sand and gravel located between and beneath the larger stones. 4.6 Coastal Bank Coastal Bank is defined at 310 CMR 10.30)as the seaward face or side of any elevated ' landform, other than a coastal dune, which lies at the landward edge of a coastal beach, land subject to tidal action, or other wetland. ' Bank is associated with the Coastal Beach,Rocky Intertidal Shore, Salt Marsh and is essentially coincident with the top of the concrete seawall. The Coastal Bank is a non- eroding manmade structure;therefore, its function is limited to protection of the interests ' of Storm Damage Prevention and Flood Control as defined in the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection(MassDEP)Wetlands Protection Program ' Policy 92-1. The Coastal Bank does not supply sediment to the coastal system,but its stability is important for storm damage prevention and flood control. 4.7 Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage (LSCSF) Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage is defined at 310 CMR 10.04 as land subject to any inundation caused by coastal storms up to and including that caused by the 100-year ' storm, surge of record or storm of record, whichever is greater. Salem Harbor landward to the seawall is mapped as Zone VE(el. 16)and a Zone AE(el. ' 11) extends from the Coastal Flood Zone including the Forest River Park pond, Pioneer Village, baseball field, basketball field, and a portion of the recreational field. ' Page 5 of 9 PLYMOUTH,MA WAKEFIELD,MA WORCESTER,MA RINDGE,NH 1 LEC 1 4.8 Land Containing Shellfish 1 Land Containing Shellfish is defined at 310 CMR 10.24(2)as land under the ocean, tidal flats, rocky intertidal shores, salt marshes and land under salt ponds when any such land contains shellfish. Shellftsh means the following species: Bay scallop(Argopecten irradians); Blue mussel(Mytilus edulis); Ocean quahog(Arctica islandica); Oyster (Crassostrea virginica); Quahog(Mercenaria merceneria); Razor clam (Ensis directus); 1 Sea clam (Spisula solidissima); Sea scallop(Placopecten magellanicus);Soft shell clam (Mya arenaria). 1 According to the MassGIS Database,the adjacent portion of Salem Harbor is considered suitable for soft shell clam(Mya arenaria); however,the area is also mapped as a Prohibited Growing Area(Appendix A, Figure 7). No specific studies of shellfish were conducted but for the purposes of this filing we presume shellfish habitat exists within the resource areas located seaward of the seawall. 1 5. Proposed Project 1 The proposed project involves demolition and reconstruction of the existing 525-foot long seawall at Forest River Park in Salem, Massachusetts. The project also involves 1 replacing an 80-foot long section of the wall with a rip-rap revetment, repaving upgradient parking areas and access roads, removing the existing concrete ramp, and installing new stairs and a ramp. The total proposed project footprint of work associated 1 with the seawall repair project is 20,225 square feet. Demolition and reconstruction of the seawall has been deemed necessary due to deteriorating conditions as described in the 1 Stormwater Management Report, prepared by Woodard & Curran, dated May,2017. Improving public safety and beach access are also significant factors in the design and scope of the project. 1 The existing seawall will be replaced with a similar structure with a top of wall elevation set at 9.50, similar to existing conditions. The wall will be constructed on footings as depicted on Sheet S-101 of the Plans and a new railing will be installed along the top of ' the wall. The approximately eighty-foot long section of the existing seawall(southern section)will be replaced with a 2:1 sloped stone revetment as depicted on Sheet C-200 of 1 the Plans. The existing ramp that extends onto the beach will be removed and replaced with a system of stairs and a new Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA) compliant ramp to the beach will be constructed, as depicted on Sheet C-201 and S-100 of the Plans. The 1 design of the new pedestrian ramp is"set-back" landward of the wall in order to match the toe of the ramp with the edge of the seawall, resulting in a net gain in square footage 1 of the Coastal Beach since the existing ramp on the beach will be removed. The existing pavement upgradient from the seawall will be replaced with new pavement after minor grading occurs, as depicted on Sheet C-200 of the Plans. Temporarily disturbed uplands, upgradient from the rip-rap revetment,will be restored with loam and seed. ' Page 6 of 9 PLYMOUTH,MA WAKEFIELD,MA WORCESTER,MA RINDGE,NH 1 LEC 1 1 As noted above,the proposed project will involve temporary Coastal Wetland Resource impacts as follows: 1 • Coastal Beach—4,363 square feet. • Salt Marsh—207 square feet. 1 • Rocky Intertidal Shore—526 square feet. • Coastal Bank—521 linear feet. 1 • Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage LSCSF)—20,225 square feet • Land Containing Shellfish—5,096 square feet 1 Proposed temporary disturbance is necessary and unavoidable for demolition and construction of the new seawall. Excavated soil will be stockpiled onsite at the previously approved upland location within Forest River Park,with care to separate 1' materials that are specific to each resource area(i.e. separate pile of Coastal Beach soil, pile of Salt Marsh soil and stones, pile of Rocky Intertidal Shore soil and stones). 1 Temporarily stockpiled soil will be stabilized, as necessary,to prevent erosional potential. Upon completion of seawall construction,the soil will be re-established within 1 the appropriate Costal Resource Area from which it was excavated(Coastal Beach, Salt Marsh and Rocky Intertidal Shore). Final grades will be restored to approximate pre- construction elevations and contours. 1 In addition to restoration of the soil profile within the associated Salt Marsh, planting of S. alternii lora plugs will occur, as depicted in the Salt Marsh Planting detail on Sheet C- 300 of the Plans. Post-construction monitoring of the Salt Marsh plantings will occur for two full growing seasons,with annual monitoring reports submitted to the Commission at the end of each growing season. 1 Various temporary soil erosion, sediment and turbidity controls, as well as BMPs,will be used and maintained during construction for stabilization purposes. Temporary steel 1 sheeting is proposed along the seaward side of the limit of work as a mitigating measure to confine the limit of work and to protect the adjacent resource areas during soil excavating and concrete pouring activity. There will be no construction-related, 1 sediment-producing, activity to cause turbidity in flowing tidal waters due to this substantive mitigating measure. Where dewatering is necessary during excavations and pouring operations, a dewatering plan shall be submitted to the Commission by the 1 Contractor. The dewatering plan shall be designed to ensure no construction-related, sediment-producing, activity will result in turbidity in flowing tidal waters due to 1 proposed dewatering. Erosion controls will be inspected/maintained for the entirety of the project until vegetated stabilization is achieved. 1 1 Page 7 of 9 PLYMOUTH,MA WAKEFIELD,MA WORCESTER,MA RINDGE,NH i LEC 1 1 5.1 Alternatives Analysis According to the City of Salem and the project engineer, alternatives to the proposed 1 project include the"no build"scenario,replacing the entire seawall with a sloped rip-rap revetment, removing the seawall entirely and the preferred alternative of reconstructing the seawall as proposed herein. Additionally,a"repair"scenario was considered and 1 determined to be insufficient due to the extent of observable deterioration to the seawall. A discussion of these alternatives will be submitted under separate cover. 1 6. Mitigation Measures 1 6.1 Sedimentation and Erosion Control 1 As previously stated and further detailed in Plans and the Stormwater Management Report, various temporary soil erosion, sediment and turbidity controls as well as BMPs will be used and maintained during construction for stabilization purposes. Most notably, 1 temporary steel sheeting is proposed along the seaward limit of work as a mitigating measure to confine the limit of work and to protect the adjacent resource areas during soil excavating and concrete pouring activity. There will be no construction-related, 1 sediment-producing activity to cause turbidity in flowing tidal waters due to this substantive mitigating measure. Where dewatering is necessary during excavations and pouring operations, a dewatering plan shall be submitted to the Commission by the 1 Contractor. The dewatering plan shall be designed to ensure no construction-related, sediment-producing activity to cause turbidity in flowing tidal waters due to proposed 1 dewatering. Siltation Fence will be utilized along the landward limit of work to protect the adjacent inland resource areas. Erosion controls will be installed prior to construction and 1 inspected/maintained for the entirety of the project until vegetated stabilization is achieved. Monitoring of erosion controls and BMPs will occur at a minimum weekly and 1 within twenty-four(24)hours of a rainfall even exceeding 0.50"within 24 hours. 1 7. Regulatory Compliance The Regulations under the Act include a Limited Project provision for maintenance, 1 repair, and improvement to coastal engineering structures that result in disturbance to wetland resource areas,described below. The City of Salem Wetlands Protection Ordinance does not contain any regulations that substantially differ from the state 1 Regulations; therefore,the following analysis of the state Regulations is applicable to permitting the project under the Ordinance as well. There are no performance standards 1 for Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage in the state regulations. 1 Page 8 of 9 PLYMOUTH,MA WAKEFIELD,MA WORCESTER,MA RINDGE,NH 1 LEC 1 7.1 Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act Regulations 1 The following analysis addresses regulatory compliance as a Limited Project under the Massachusetts Wetland Protection Regulations. 1 According to the Massachusetts Wetland Protection Regulation 310 CMR 10.24(7)(c) states, The following projects may be permitted as a limited project pursuant to 310 CMR 1 10.24(7)provided the project complies with all applicable provisions of 310 CMR 10.24(1) through (6) and(9) and(10): 1 2. The maintenance, repair and improvement (but not substantial enlargement except when necessary to reduce or eliminate a tidal restriction)of structures, including buildings,piers, towers, headwalls, bridges and culverts which existed 1 on November 1, 1987. The seawall is a structure that has been in existence since the 1950's;therefore,this 1 provision may be applied to the project. The project has been designed to minimize the disturbance to wetland resource areas to the extent practical given construction requirements, and includes measures to maintain the footprint of work during 1 construction, including enclosure by sheet piling and preparation of a dewatering plan, if necessary. Temporarily disturbed resource areas will be restored in place, as described above, and no permanent disturbance is anticipated. There will be a net increase in 1 Coastal Beach by removing the existing concrete ramp from the beach. 1 8. Summary 1 On behalf of the Applicant,the City of Salem, LEC Environmental Consultants, Inc., (LEC) is filing the enclosed Environmental Notification Form (ENF)and Supplemental Report in accordance with the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act(M.G.L. c 30, s. 1 61-62H, MEPA) and the MEPA Regulations(301 CMR 11.00)for the Forest River Park Seawall Repair Project. The seawall will be rebuilt to meet current standards and safe public access to the beach will be improved by the project. The project will involve work 1 activity within coastal wetland resource areas, including Salt Marsh, Coastal Beach, a, Rocky Intertidal Shore, Land Containing;Shellfish and Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage(LSCSF); however, all disturbances will be temporary in nature, with each 1 resource area fully restored post-construction. The project has been designed by Woodard&Curran in collaboration with the City of 1 Salem and LEC to achieve compliance with the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act (M.G.L. c. 131, s. 40), its implementing Regulations(3 10 CMR 10.00), and the City of Salem Wetlands Protection Ordinance(Salem Code Chapter 50). 1 1 1 Page 9 of 9 PLYMOUTH,MA WAKEFIELD,MA WORCESTER,MA RINDGE,NH 1 LEC 1 1 Literature Referenced 1 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection-Division of Wetlands and 1 Waterways,Delineating Bordering Vegetated Wetlands Under the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act, A Handbook, dated 1995. 1 Massachusetts Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program Atlas of Estimated Habitat of State-listed Rare Wetlands Wildlife. Natural Heritage&Endangered Species 1 Program,Massachusetts Division of Fisheries& Wildlife, Route 135, Westborough,MA 01581, www.state.ma.us/dfwele/dfw 1 Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act(M.G.L. c. 131,§. 40),www.state.ma.us/den 1 Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act Regulations (3 10 CMR 10.00), www.state.ma.us/deo 1 City of Salem Wetlands Protection Ordinance(Salem Code Chapter 50). 1 National Flood Insurance Program,Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood 1 Insurance Rate Map New England Hydric Soils Technical Committee, April 2004, 3m ed., Field Indicators for 1 Identifying Hydric Soils in New England, New England Interstate Water Pollution Control Commission, Wilmington, MA. 1 Reed, P.B. 1988. National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: 1988 Massachusetts.U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. NERC- 88/18.21. 1 1 1 1 PLYMOUTH,MA WAKEFIELD,MA WORCESTER,MA RINDGE,NH 1 1 1 ' Appendix A ' Locus Maps Figure 1: Aerial Orthophoto ' Figure 2: FEMA Flood Insurance Map Figure 3: USGS Topographic Quadrangle 1 1 1 1 1 I N k tel." Ti LL•`p,il .:'. 1 q• l '_.. ' it*k+i WC K`s' z V yA � �� •P "Y.r { S/ �j� � ' ,• a s .t' - T Nlf\SSwis i2013 Aerial Orthophoto acquired fmm the Olfice of Geographic _ • )o 600 m Feet a w= 14iiv.'.i:+•4@'." �±�,�wa...•..'"\5�•- ! 34yxri $1 -` 5� +c✓',»c;�'_7F+�ri,T.�°`t+��,�```•:��'�.':4 � piy `�� • m r i yyo::a • nM Ah aF YY1 �4 e�'•4 3"} (■1 y •� F o. C s II.SVi,{�1�a�`'i'�,�*ie-• S� i•i.s �f•`,, �p f:r•r'�iry�"'�'i mrt'v�••v•.•�iY4._/��Tr•4.§wmnl�4�� 4 � • 2r"•aa 'It —x : �\J:A.Utlll r'�2� w i��•,�,i � �i� 3r�A a eyy4 SV�i Y�� Y� �`' i i iii � r • vii,'♦ .�gc• •� �R•. •"'�i�''y,.it�' • �• • 69RI w}2�� 6z� • •_cs• i"'M J `i i�' 'i � �•"i+��i�,t • Y�• • "Y.r.r ns " }'} 'f .w•bi.:i • N i• \ ♦ #r < I •ar j• iJ V 7 Y 4 ti �� . �-��'R`arn� y O = tfr win � jr r,.••rsris� • .Y•� icy epJi 'J g:}�`i�''�`w 1` •4 f I //jj�� \ • NJ•f i • i h•V •3 • • •.f fr•,A • b {( Y?5 Jy� i i -, �4��•,A'i ate�++•. . ii"i ♦ sHei:��•*+na b b SH n�`'u �•w a •„b Lw ys�:�'g °'xt yp G"`�gj�I � _ • r • F• gr ♦ ♦ s N {I • '• "V �w�f�•rV �• • •br ♦'.,• ,• .� � y"•^:".-�yU' "•.• • • y!qµ[§a.•��{{�� ri G^' •�•,i 1R#i � ie,ybFa i • L 3• so-: w r • • • � • iY�'I „• �e'i0 � ) Y�4 V ryi p� i y b • e • ! Y • f s =�� 'lRg • 1'i e • • • • • V N • • • it 4 V • • i ? /• • i • • • Y • •- i k f)�lN V i •'.Y A • ii.1 i 19 IY -V P V J • V • • i V • • • •:♦ V • •'• • r• O ��] i \ �� 'r A�Y;s }':ti.A�i i • • • Y A • i a M • • • b 4s a r a •. ) ;+• 14 i �iN • a • '�333� 4 • y x "` ��-i h r i •g i +s r'V • • •,J�a 9 4 ,V10 W-*,*, V 'Ay,l ' 0 d'^ •��r [ •-i 4y .b L7��/�f'•N'�<�I/�y�vV L7�' • • e s 'e�,�l Q � j •�,}f�• \�V,='r1 b i V 15i��.1 ` �! r i rte• � „_1 .,V tY ♦ • A 1��• � �{,+�y .�,. e �gt,�y *Yi • r • • •.•-i �[�it A i,+�r r • i "•;j� j, _ ♦ 1„• • '• y y♦-• i-• + • 1%fit �1 I fit" m V ' • ili. +_ ` epi f ♦ • • r • s • • • a 1 'i •lii • �f a'C �• ��_ L- O l ,.d ��f i i Re •.i d t s ! ♦ V J i A�'�' w MA. y `� - V i • J Y • • r i i �� 1 it s �� j Y • Y A • •• • • e '• a •'� 1 f- x w�� ht ]SAM py �OlgP i tJ. merove ' . • ark Pickecyhg z tY �, ♦ i- ri Poi»ref t , ,A a / t 1 "� .4 _ ... u 0 500 1,000 2,000 Feet r, ' Figure 3: USGS Topographic Quadrangle NN LEC' Forest River Park A Seawall Repair Project vymwm.lu May 30,2017 Salem, Massachusetts wwYwNmnmmXLL.am 1 1 1 ' Appendix B ' Department of Public Works Seawall Repair Project Notice oflntent Submittal Plans, prepared by Woodard&Curran, dated May 25, 2017 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS FOREST RIVER PARK SEAWALL REPAIR PROEJCT CONTRACT NO. X-XX N ' Mayor: KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL a �' J Y \_ r-s 0e. Sakm O Hfta Rod: salem W b ^ Ix °stx�. ' S City Engineer: DAVID K. KNOWLTON, P.E. „,„ m• N "°Ha d s, wn.e w e ' _ - __ _ _ - - _ _ __ - __ _ _ ell° 5T wn•niNm $ _ - _- _ - -_ �Hlll r• \ n„•x� SouM f°Iper Polnt CONDITA- tl\,\ �, max.. wn n e„„n a tone Point PROJECT LOCATION ' - -- _ _ _ 9�MIIYBD� � �q`'%= k C I p` /?_ ,,' 9 rbv )�'"• - - MAY 24 2017 ,ieee NOTICE OF INTENT SUBMITTAL ��. �\ 10 SHATTUCK ROAD,SUITE 110 ANDOVER,MASSACHUSETTS 01010 36&702-6171 I www.woodardmmn.eam ' WOODARD COMMRMENT 8INTEGRRY DRIVE RESULTS 1\ &CURRAN SWRCE: USGS TOPOGRMXIC MM PROJECT LOCATION MAP SITE LOCATION MAP W&C PROJECT NO. 0230529.00 1 1 2 3 4 5 1 6 21.SHEET 1:1 ABBREVIATIONS' LEGEND ak GENERAL NOTES: SEDIMENTATION & EROSION CONTROL NOTES: W K.T Y y ee 1. WESEPLWs ETRE PREPARESrad A OIAMNAnd M Mbu A d n1E I 14D L %X.Allo Wp3d...ttI NE KI Fwd Io gN�IMKIgH AcENW. AOR AglEW1E � � E ISKAE'NG bWu MANWE NAS RlewNlE9 w YAr 2006 d ME dgwD SONNEI xb nlRpNldr ME Uwr W w a dSNRBEO M CbIwA M xORr n d0lEp1 K.T b41 YMA F 3 Cd6UClL0 er ANN s6L4 eEIYEFII CCIOEII XANL A.ETE.MN TIES.1 MD WE CANNOT AT LEA9r M xdM PPod TO CMSnNCTI N MOMOM AX9 A EAMNAC.IMndu sIYIOAROs wsnlVlF �- e" 2. THE IWOzdru..SHOWN...ANE ROLES YASSAp11Ym$TATE 0.ANE 2 ME Cdne .91A1L SE REEDd9EEE FEET IYRDIF.Au W09d Nlraa YEAWRES APNpy: APPROAS Amr .. Id _ CWTgw 0'd I'w1ERVu1 122- e n Sb OEEI 2s(NAD el). 1ELESSARr TS TAENSNI RI-9rz IRNRwc 6 EMW.SEMNNI AMD SHIFT KING TOWNS CEXTgIa(wOEX) -120- 's b H ' 1 n6 YEanLK D.NNY SMIM Nf1Ed RErE11EV[ES NAM 19e6 ffllawMR LCGndS A¢ ? fAOSd CdiR0.YEA4IIE9 SMALL BE NSPECIED AT A YMVLY f1EgNNLI CE ONCE ElfR1 WS eprld If�TINNL - -F',I -d B S w 91D1W d PLANS YEER NSI MAKE N•AFTER EE1Y MN EVENT SEATER MAN OSI Y NECESSARY epl III "MY sEMER 5 R£RALEYdi d IEPwR WI BE PV6SOIED wRMI DY ME aXl1dCTW. l AREA ERry ND NIGHT W ANY LKlaw6 S10W xgEON ANE AMMONTArz AM DO NO G. LMTp6wL FSM1E YAK C REPg9NT A PRFDERT SNANI A PROMd KS YNNTAIN SILT Slat MET ROrznd AT Al CAT(N DAsws Wnd WE FANI LMT OF NNR AND OONISMUY 6 ME.1c a MSR.IEAWIE SET$AS{s NEw TO.RLE a GSI�WM SUN,D.A. +f 5. WWRIOS SHOWN KRESI AWE LOCATED BY NEMS CP Age.MNI ub.ES STORK VIEWS AND REPIALE RTI sbxs At FW R STOM EVENT TO P NVAENT RgTMG A mllaWm INNI WIT CNK Is NGHd9•E rd NNTAKIGANrLAaIG RTI sAds aNMD WM AENL um ° - --A---- urElDTux ---K--- y� ._ 8 A e. Sm egd43 ASSFER ND BY TEP I OBOAALTANTs wE YNIWwS cEWIUTED BY LEC NIC W.S.xSMU - CONERECONI YM A SER UST Fi S WE CgAW.NOR 9x.M1 LE RE3d5@LE FOR wSTULMG AND YAKIASIDIc A PNOTEcnK 8 X. URATY L ANONS SHOWN w ME A,WS AND PlI MEAPR PRABaM TE BCM AS TO SIZE BANBq d1A Ned CSRTR ME STE .AND SONEAS 1. M WL W�NIM I dWIOKKwO gEclwt gb ALMAnW CpIRACId TO MAESTIa2 EOSTKS gANYTONS Aro WELD NW Or LOGTIdsCON LLLLc Cf UTEJWS ME SSS IOEACE..'sPRION TO tlNSTli0cn�1L COI ME gUNEER e. NA OTS idMflAM SSL ERS,d.S IIT ANO TIwMM1 CdTRI AS WIL AS.ANLL EMON TENSA A'ngl IRpE�dN IBEPNSS �2 Cx1 I.g4ENENwc CONSI AM WE DTSTNG ND KHAN EED ITNI W OSD AVD UNTAKEO..RMsiwIC.rd srAiluTNN FOXINESS =At.NOT IZL ENSTNG a..ANE MOM d WE SHARKS CONWEEld rs �T �SON -lam uNLfASIQIIU TEIENsd n � ox f� RESYl1EWE Fd LONA.ALL EYs1KU URI 1. TENI STEEL WEETK Is FRCPOSED WTWI TM NASIAL IESWR6 REAS As A C(WR NWUGnD - GS IIIIE c ' 0� ms MISTAKING VEISINE M WIIwE THE MIT OF YSII(M0 TO PROTECT ME IAMCENT IES MI N ' 6 LdTKT WTI SSE'.TggMdE SMYMA-221).AT LEAST 72 Mala$KNOR M Cd1311NCnd. MEAS.MK SOL EF ..ME CS .KRNdc ACTMTY. CS CAI®a1 STEEL MARS TAK '4N UU .T..NNPAq..URl11ES ERC WEcr qMu CARE ONEBEAO f1EC110C (L 31e u E MERE TOLL BE NO LQIsnNCMN-SE ATEA SI'MEN-AnCWLMG ACTH TO CAUSE AMENIn _ ___ P. RESTRICT AC TO 9rz naaNPV gl WE USE OF RNATE SKI BMMNRS ER.TENI PLNWC RA NY WATERS SHE TO MR SVBSYAAWW bGANE. aE nINO AN A gNTER TBW WAEO sE14R P ANNE NM WE GENET.ACKE MAN. SIR MAU BE ISS WM ANNa1EATE E EIZETY YEASORES w AI aldc AUTO V Nc KLWS 0 1Rpld S.XI TER Sod 9. IXCI.VATED Sd RL BE s1M�AID ONSITE AT TE N6Ma9Y/ggpYED IIM1N LOLAnd 0 DENAN RATER ABYEOND NATER U. �e pAENO NDA.XRNS SIR YlE1Y Is WE RN IE®11Y d CONTACTOR,IMANG WMEN faEST NNW PAI SON Wa BE EN ERAR LY s10.NMED AK STAB UZED As SOWN NTNNIIO.VO NOI-Na6Mc... . .SIGH R..NNE,Kb MES VSO NECE.TO PIEMIR EASONAL PMENn. FA EAcx PANTO IY NE E 01 Mu PAI HAS NOT®1 C EEO 1 0.WINON COS O SUM.Vl FRSIRVCI.M Sal TOLL ON(OUS"AddES W.ME EIEC ONE F EL R M ONg I Ndi wAY R 10.PRONCE N S L ASO LOW ANT SEED w ALL PLA 41FAS gsN10ES BY CdT.Ntld3 EATERIrz OX.A D.1 A NI WWI IT NAS FAVI BE (TMST.BEAK.RCRY UgyHT 6WAMNS VNESS OTOdY KRO d ME MK NERTD.I AM 5.r YM91). FWAK SHALE$TOLL BE RWICRES TO MV0.0wNR EN'ON III Y sE1TH IA R NTE-aMMACTd fIFVAlld9.WO WIIaK NSI.EC ENS1wE , `.. t' LIXE CP N£f£rAnd '1�. y�w` 11.CdT.1d I. REFUTE E T PANEYdi YNRKR 1NPING AS INCESSANT NNNF "T OPNI9d y 9 WACIFD BY CaISIRUCIgH It.SYl Y.W91 RSISUTM 91.4E PR06E0 N ACCSAWQ WM WE cETAe ON 91FEi P EAi E TEN .. Ado E b 3 x,n 1E CONTMTON Is REGHa1SBlE Fd NNWNG YAI STORME AND STAKM MEII FEa THE IS WISE OEWATEUS IH NEOS RY dNK EXCAVATds AND AKMAO 6gNI A EX1FH EIIIFM9d y� WIRY REdeNYdTIL Aa U..BE STORES N ME PMONEE BA .RED. RWATDINO PI SHALL SE SMOTTED ro ME GPD•E9QI EY ME axITACTEN. fC ANELECE TO TILQE d'd ---- RTMreK wYL n n l' C IS cO NET OIRCE NLY£ss TO d SIDE EMINENT d.WOR aW ON ANS I OWED IS ME OWATEEK.PMI SHALL BE cE9dE0 TO aI91NE K LYNSTWCnON-RELATED. TON ..DAN. PRIOWIV.INIE55 PEWIssd xb EELN rAWIEO w NRlnxc er oNIW. TONSONT-WEW01c AcmmTr TO VLY NI®an N EENLV('nvu NARAS a1E TO R TARE ExdawdEa Ti)_.'ter='r_✓_Y)'Y> sIOEM" OOOOOOOCO'.� WWGY➢cEYA1ENMG W.TIER R, FLaN ANNI PETSdu meSEN YAY KL K US NE W SK TR PI9C Nali CSA KAY d d ATE MON ROI EIEVWON IA PNVATE oNIlg1E LOTS UwfSE POb69d las BOI dWIEO w IMINc BY o111Nn. Aw MON a50 L FEN R Y.N.aALE SENSE a PAYSON, IS NEZNOw IIWR WTW WE N011s O.1 O EST,E,.S..NARPOMI.NEW FIN nMa CITY NR R00N TO START O RNR.AOYT..CON.MN PW OHR.EN O " YNN EOQ O OOLQ ' le C0 . CONS TO O..AN SEAM AK VAlgl eflRPN1ENR M NNWS OY cM1W L - - ORAS TRA i B OBMMXI Of 9RNLF TO RE9cENTs WD BII9'ESgS CV[WRNE c9HAMN CE MIVArz Wv WLVAHIIp I--I ISI-I-� RIILMAO TAas B ulNn OMEES WM AITECIFD IESCdR AND BU9INESE Al LEAST TM DAYS(1e NNRS) W Gc GAS wrz vuLE 5$� ANa m C19 ..EEE WE.RMRWIS. ERN GAI PER KVN dAKAGE aid/SNME �RMIN12.wpTECT.MD Am MONSOON,MEANS"MANAGES MET EOKMYARRs. PROECT EMRIO SSL L.WOIs FEET ANTIITE GNM(Ea dl0 OTIC NINES.POEs uarr PONS..SAvls,ER)AK BEES xwz xwazdT. :`vl sraa WAN NFE s..eAm+ pUNxG GINSIRVCIKM. x P xId PON, ..A-.. ' le druN RMMD RINOrs Ed TONANKAIY AND FENAMAUT sTOaOAD1G O WI ANUS SIR 50 R IE XT NEIOIr __- -__. _ -- RRWO Mc x/CdRESHdDwc MG NO TMO MATER TAN ROS M0 YEEL IANKAaF ANAD RMI TCONK L MF OR S MEMN NOT E . MONDE w INRE gWEIEn j RERVIdd1S ME YARN STOCN1ED w THE I.RAKLRMD AREALOOLATED AN M Y ANNE N9MMN IK R.NEA-AND WATERWATERMALTS BASEMAN RID. NL iNTWgS GREEN RdD X W HWr 19,Ned TO START O VISNA.MOiMEY ROCKS d ONE RE-Cd511NClld CONMTdS IN ..WM WE OOIY KESS AIR....9N6NQ BATONS(P.T. lG TEASSILT TENS m _ WISDOMS,QOSSM.%O Il NI•G NSI .YD NLATED ITERS),INTAKE L p .Pdli EMT O. a m .O DM AND KOWN LOSSTO WE ENOI®I NHd la..RNR. YAY YAYIYd M.NNdE AID IECNLY gSN'6[O REAM.b0 OQAS19N0 AACNR5 MCUAXNO EXKOIc AN YEdMNGL ABANIIN M RAQ I TBE 1A.S.xYORANT MIMI MD C0611NLTON ONE ANN Y DEOI NEN RdoK.VS...SAW * � 21,NSTdE ANAS LSMNES.Ed1MCTOI ONENASONS TO OWN.AMSI OR IN TEND W K2• YENECMUNAIAICAL.M•x. KNONE.MD MS90i PMWdT O (GRI PA\EIENI.ONBS.OUSE ETC} NYIgE USES 9116 A=RWONAY STORNQ WERE W KOK, u1EDNM TK W.KWSNNESD AT 11®O ABYMl 2 W5TOlO 0AmmNXN ddR d NO HOER 91NRVc ' E xs NEAR NT _L )V[. x xx WE UYR O RVw'E".ON WE dAYp6 NPIEONT 1N LTOR O SINAL[ME STS NOT T,ST NO SENTER CR�i 91B91N'A6 W1N®W2 AND IRSA0011 O FASRIO 9NSACF IFAT➢Es(9101 AS O 410E gME1EN \IN•..n. PAHA m AID SGNNLl NO AIMINNY OBaISATN dNl BC PNd6m!d NOOt d 01SMEA0 FWgwEO HYOD TINY NNS HANEKS.TFYFOWO USE O M TONIC UWYL -WAY IHV,N. wV.dr d1SE TN.1 O RVN.N MLGNES Ad IWED SAN.AED.D NL . OPER 091NnN EL EL XNLKK fL OJL%V �d AS SEENAW AND WEN.S11NASE AND CONTENI OPERATIONS IN NRMDAXLE N ME T xdyE ygMN/UTERY T N ME C0.pM9Cxs WTI w DYSON 1. 1.0 NMEO J J ll.Nl Cd..SAN EOPNEIII SA L N d WELWONAN.O ME S2:ANAIL AS PSI "MACES Fp MM Nd Z CdSTNACTd EO T..RNR ROI ME.. Pr NEE91N"E"m PD PANTED PM FO.YMIYL aOCIRE SWTART YYW YAINaE J LLl Cgi R® RWT1 CdONR EWPTCAL US CWAW/.K YMMOE ® ZOZ � ASSAYROODNINCNSD COIWETE ROP R£ Ti 1FIFIpIE YAXMOE 0 J p F- RRA RAGHT OF ANYo UIO1 USEA H w ycT ActtNl ROW1Y WAAAEAT z >N S r ACEI E SAME .NON Iz"E. �'Y1 ELv.And SAN M Y'MxaE ^�' MATE V.N BOR m It b' SKI 9EOICATONS OASE vYN[ N a SO SAIME SE ET SiAKMD STI UL BOR M 1gRCNARY SEEK NAU Y Udi POE M TNtlL VIHAT'ME KK MO.dWlrz OIW C MM41T wSAW a AC NATER G1E IIIY4E ANI E N3 WATER SERNLE EOXI PETER 91UT OF T a STREET AND AINflLM'Ld5 SAKE Vl 4 TESE ME GMERAL IHMEVNTONt NOT Ill/A2M ON MESE , _i TpFRKNE..STE WGW AMASE jW ; ' S Nle cCOW15.,"t S` D Wa nNo b SEF EEY Sa GgDI. A(v. CaOIBdS TIEE/SNOB w Z X S. D B-001 MNAu xDTR ABBRFNAnds NFO®.s MEET RGq 'P-Y TOO NT TP-I 3?z q ' 8 aML y r B 'J'NIB,I S DF EE-,LO NO1NO MNM11P1s NM TWOPRGE 3 D R o-1aE Brz INPARI.Amx Tux 'ti'--- 6D_R �� c-2d uMvr 6 mAwlc NM °i " c-zol sArllu NAR MD PRaeF � � 2 c-sd cnE mmas I .sFLnd SET. 5 s1RVC_A, AB NO.:OISSIO,M. s-IC, AgLS$RNIP OIINCRW.NW EAE:NAY 21.6 10I1 9-101 ACOSS R. 206 YcT.N GErNS SCNf:AS N0 SHEET 2 C4'10 HOME DF WrIEN'T SU o Ali VIT L G-001 1 2 3 4 5 6 ' 1 2 3 4 5 6 xb0B5N�:; Y a@ Fa - w oz g6 O� 3a `3 �.`�__ — `" i _— //. / \� / z /L a C9x. h �iV ,-.,_ L._ — - / ess�,.rLE z z i' O If PIf 11 i x m ,a. At I)IT ate -�,os / A - POaYD 6 � . TlP—c o zo' w' .w o-ozmxv ao a a iv cxca mmxic scams eiroxE Uauc ' 8 HOTME OF NTEH7 SUo Ali CYT L EX-100 1 2 3 4 5 1 6 s ea iun xrue rllerru �,IF t— o0 53 ' 00 '✓ / � cwsru wu sa.a u 3Eb jgg�g j� � 1ccLE uodr wrtnlm.<swEE sxe.ms slur uwv9, :Enm u T.fWlflAli M"mms uu�iS^ FF F IF fmO�E Fv51wE ofxdos i E j 6 �� ` c;✓' \+y, �� .- �-enc, a<F-„ FF" a m- swMEwsmc e. .: �' � caxvaa nram voce EmnxE \�• � <,�74 , ro EE uuo�n sEsuua / k e vrtoscrinsiwE nrVA„„. �OOEIIT EuuLmn(iro.) E^' V a 1 vxoisi u�c �• 1 � X F t iF ��3 ` B V I¢uPh u9 SmE K % C..� '•,1 PETwH�R%2� X �� + 3l -i f •�. BflRx / [L mm x o I I A` �, r \ W W 6♦ t Y i lwE(iM1') 1 1 IIOT fl v /�I � wr lr� L3 CEUEE o � Miw u0 m°hCi I- / 8 urp B4UAE4 a° / / o CVs qn DN D - � ralcn � .1 2.•� , Ev . E BSuE� A. azo'..: 20 S CMECx LgaMiL SLOE 9EipiE 119X4 91EEi., C£o p g HOME (OF WENT SM o MMAL C-100 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 '°°` ; ' E a@ Bw Fd --LIN E W 30 Lw u B REYENENi !. 2 t7.:-FY's �,� —rvT�X Ybr rk 1`�TNt las aac gg�� n yc r �.'a v '.route ' Y7P ro s a Ei q Ai,I Nye - • 3.a AMMA IF, az ) I " /¢9 ne 14 i Ml fB j.,.a— Ml 1 �tll--------------- � - beYfs i2 r 2. �y�Vif BA25GLE 3 n i� INSET 1 4aF I SCAM 1'.EV cx[IX cu RqS USING /dict K, —L! u+keH %- A ele ✓ ron su*iNi.Sx'°° A, xesimE mssn � � �� b; 1 1� I P. a: ivcx e SI MING AAI rOW .1 ANI 5 r/ M➢)b pl M1!4 I-- oo III ! ti�+� A:xGI Q pQ / J F�1 fD.Y.4m(M.) a4 C -'m , a A, n�1 RAMP M �M SIN, 9 `-"M 'GM11 YO .MIAMI o}5 /unaNwa; «. : -a E �' MY pR 1 5L �a /p d x0.:0325]39.17 i BSP YaIE 0 Dd2'.u�v 3 5 aELM LflA>xiC 44E BEfWE cSHL SxfEi: 5 pr:o HOME OF NVEHY SU o �11i ITIT L C-200 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 ' a@ 5 Fa A *� .:... • ' l § A •. �' < §44 �2 is I OD 6 rY � !0 11 x 2.mn y B RETAINING WALL LAYOUT - SCHEDULE 8 PdNi STAMN NORTHING FASTING TOP WALL �` \D L A 0+0283 3010865.83 822033.31 9.50 )• $ - 5 1 7 a 0+13.17 3010638.% 822W1.12 9.50 M^ L i O s C 1+00.38 3010]51.]2 822038.05 9.50 i 1 `I\ { ` * f - X� \A - ' : D 1+90.24 3010665.67 622063.95 9.50 �f / e i E 2+8935 W10594J6 822133.05 9.50 / / P 3+62.28 3010541.94 622163.47 9.50 / ,(� / ./ lc EGF`[ :. '/ \ / y - r G 4+W.28 M10510.05 e22213.79 9.5D �1 -�' P - I i• _' H 4+18.28 301OW1.9 82222223 9.50 4+4032 3010485.8) 82223].40 9.50 J 4+48.98 30104)].55 622234.10 9.50 ^ NOTE d�F SlD w.W N YAWYA EKE w r AB C 0 E f E J e tti 6 FP605ro SEAw1u O I O C v 10,1 , .. 4 - _ _ - - -. _ I _ - ..- -- 6 C f dA6E To w w - _ _ _ x P. - -- - _ �. 5 .. m+WWB✓ A. / 1. FR01LC CtlrTYNQIs 4.OM21FA FF16WA. d ' ___ .-. +--_ _-__ -.____ ____. _ __ - V16EAN1➢1 IS PFA SILLEi /��YFiA A U9fA. J ^ r- -_. _.I_- _ y _ '__._ _ S ELcvAmN s AS YE ErtEn PEEIWI, uwaVu eE J III _ Si4I[0 ro INWOE PppnM:MJa4V£ro W,Z1, Q T Pawl.PnwrowArz uEVAlror Aza msm m avc I➢FApY,ON AT LAND SM PPAT,o-3W fOf uKUT s M*2& FLN. AND EYIYMP r.la E0.aLNAT YE.VI xlpl YRR(Yx'1) -___ %aME Ar y/W/Jp VYTs ExI4�.ANP Gi�PNt1 w�YVLxA0.rN1�fM1�NC�T N a .1 WT EL-IM E4A1 1£R YAi N] I`_ ___ __. ___..___.___ __ __ __ _ ______ __ _ _ _ ___ _ _ UMYAVCTW/0.Mm0.AYr3(C/TJJ AT YAwYW � �WAFE ANAlY951E9PfT � -_ D 46-0'0.G AY Sx0'M V.N0.(XfFERRFAIPE%WIR M.X AND a I (YNIw LL�4.N) YO P} T Rx1RKlp1 WKx:..0kClFM WT NWNCE A ' SOTTON OT MNG M- &42 BELKOI Arg KYVPYI.S' T A ECOIING TO MIp PON P A, P.ulQ/T AND 6EVAnpG S ro Ex9NFO1 PON APYAWK vi _'j �\ f-5 4 FIr@®1 ipIWARAOVK MW KN�GWLAW(ONE PROY£ < 101 ___ _ I F / G EOYl3D 1 r APPRO.LCGMN 6 ODNW( PAOWO A YAIIXVP 6 nR FEi1YY1A O. 0.AV AXP ao¢axN�L Ivrmr PXvaE sI¢i aGEms Axr YmnnnvG ro 'W^ ' e - __ __ / _ _ _ _\ / _. - _-.__ -... _ / _ - TOmm.MNIl Ymxaa FuvAnwrs..Cl U�r __ \\ \ 11 _ __ vGi - ' Y _./- \ F--/ / -10 613TAHWO wy1 S1EY MWT FFCEFOS Y T. N \ / NO TEY MONUR R6f9P1 OF RRIINHO WALL.1 665 a 4 L2 \ // \\ / II 3 D n ___ ____ _ __ ___ ______ _ _ __ �._ y_15 VI ° 0+L---- -- _� oo _. z+oo - _--_ }� ----- 4+00 --- - ----µ za c II, ' -- / - - za GY 29 00 + a Po I a -zo ----_ .- . .-_ _�_-_-_-._ 00 IreasEeLe SO _zY' scKE As aorto e CXEC„ERAPxiC SC4E 9EfGRE V9HG 9:EET B C(i0 PROPOSED SEA�W�AL�L�O+OOroTO STA. 4+50 LfRTY.R Swr: r-W HOME O2 VVY SUoMMAL C-201 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 ' Y l a IP "a E ip AwA TO REIrM urmisnzDxD Are:n ro eE wsluRtm e ' - �m� � Sg U}'ll Y YAH Si.VfES AnLm � 3� y ` K-K aC W DDwIMnMYi �• � .- { SGE.VO TNFE s1wS RA Lm A A ' N'cWR LW-DEVM a LW • b€ roeE e• BSS 8 =b Dz €� /oma N- .-wAU.D.mw X mD3 END ro EW wM , Do ' LDa(M.1 NV THE rW qty TME (,3 wm s HITTINGx nv sg:W La Ed �N dO1L tz 1. LgRLWND siY{E GGAT .WD StwtEND 819E LON. erI FPW W.VID SF➢IIRNi Lw11gR Y.1MI4 NN Y.VIIIfnLNWA'3 RFaIIR11mIR A T ^°PLS3° COIR LOG suesM GN WEE ACT ro mALE / NnuroY/mvenamL MERAND ILANT Pmss ` P -RUDIEu IN z-ixa EAT Hors MEET AND MATCH MINAG PAY T AT I y.Y mL VP yIY MM NO,ASiNALr ( / TiuE-RELEAS i„RYIRER IN HII4PICRTE 4ALWi // EEE N N11N1£AE LA. DOONED DUI A I y NAL TF. I ' r rn-wNYwWS CMP6R rAClt GOATi1N51®DRADE� m \jJ' I i ` / ✓ ' B ICP aNI NI E rn•wNYwDW LDYLIE2BNLADNW v Y SwDER Law3E OMI C0.lIIPER uE l ENI IAI WIREE ' e• A.Am carom ,C,/P(>�L v ry _, „ • .L �.. �,.ti., •.. \ �y Avvvonw ES LA.OF 2- V� ..�sam/LE 2-3 NCHEs W j roVRO UNrt�9onmrc T��\ GOD".sIeWALf 'i ' PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT AT SAWCUT LINE L�iovml 9uu a INTO,E9AwE VAL imLALa O..T musty Tra: am .1 ro mALE swxawdxD ANLA Aro ON.VA'.BETAON sx um zvx wcwc YATTE0. b Fi x TDPsm sxMADE A YAmuY sm¢vs a r Aro 91ALL wwww ro ME -FFFFI o PauoewD wnu wATrvr: MIX 6PdSe'G z.'TD sD' I rn'T�cam(YxrLw) xo. eww ucnry mae wAMR H TOE((+�3)— XO.3tl1 ]8-.0 E4T NAM4 11NTIx45 o In'®nWvas fAIOSR I i S NOT BE DaIRo.ITED oMA P %Y LA Tvur EPD3N..1.. C nxuD1E arrDfR cou.(Y>w.m) stow.ILr ON.".1 YET VONA. ]V s waEs� NEAV LDW WAIfR -1.— ! DYEmv alrwAC1ED$WB 9rALL BE LE0.YPACho TO A r6vWY DEPTH IF IY. I, s10 Aro YID YIeTWE 3 SMAIL H YRLweAR Prot wpWMD Y(SAHL ens LwwY p/YAIE ArD ML tlw%n AW 911SACE VSAQ.R6FA ro srAlE pll[QIrFS �� SPEW(s ns Vca4�4w e. DDID 94A M IYR®AT RARS RENANNI ON suTE o11C1➢oS / ). APPLr IMp oWf sEELm ARVS w A('mrgAxCE oM HATE aMmMS y R .V//�//✓/�//�//�/ e. smaw 9IAlL BE ADI IN Aaw ..wM 9 ..wl1.AT A J CR DOGWOOD,ur sm w WAmnm m,R Duty Dwuwm AND LD o3sao/SGV® H C cwvACTm aewArc TDvsaL wAa D.PDRrNimlwAn NO TN WwGOOD R N.,..ax mavEs TRANSVERSE MEW t ANCMR WD TO Mm w 0.1II Dxm W.ON IN-ANT WrwrM. o BITUMINOUS CONCRETE PAVEMENT SECTION PERMANENT VEGETATIVE SOIL SALT MARSH PLANTING NOT ro WALE NOTNOT TO SCALE v o MoIE'. caavocouce mRCVCMouT EALI uI ET:xnxcerExl.TA - eE Gnu. I DM conss z'vE.T HAU%PH.TED 1TE-M MIM EuowwwM NIER. Q NNm Y a X02 D. 3 DR ;N D om a ' % LDB ND.:DTWDW.W DAIE:uAv 3S 31I roi S SCAIE:AS x01Eo r SXEET: )Ci r0 B HOME OF f it I N'W SMS Ali/ 0� ll QLD C-300 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 2nMEF & �b � 3E y 9 a d A Bs�Aj g $ A ' 30 VROVOaO WwE 30 mS,xE 4naw �5_ 8c C WS11ME WwE /OC PA 6 7yaX119 �JYI IE � SO ' SECTION a $CNL: O 5-1W a A B m 8 a� 1 � g 6z woM vuass �� R su scows (sa auxs rW vanmrs) ,_y_— wos eclrcw WtQ flLCRs ' o � ��•"�/ C� \!, C 1 8 I 2 o � Fr r ,. soE m ss sauxom W N1asMflmq umm�u um�mxgsrtw3 a _ �f MM WO1E008LK EHgHFFP's REttVYElNn11Wi ' $ - nan F w C v �Cwus W wu m K wnoC w WVwms W s3gm soxs a qY YNKnbl IwIES oMSRgss Ip1FD.ND m Mgl msmc •mwlm•wm srol¢wos uswc Ww-nu W oM.nws.ortn N v , Wu¢ ,�. \ comncrto slwWntt uslxm swrna ro s s¢Em wm uaa®(.wn-wE.211sW - \ wM comm qmq (Ew-aus W omrA W xmflosonm mmisW r g _i______ .. Irma-Woman enOvu sma)ns*narnm. �/1 _____ -ry. { t r ,,: - 3 mnu Nm s®unr g0ilm W slq£a6F5 M2NE nCRs Is F i moi'' MIW3 W w nnGs W M-C .PV3gl'MRIE\EQunW is a a _ _ A. _ w+islm wlm nwn0,m w WOMgwciu sl. /.c sI cOPiOwna wIx ]W Q E.xW/ew1[W Nim � E DrR (Nw.) Ns� D Ig,n a Zo s e STONE SLOPE �1 $ xm m sws o-zaE ao 5 AB N0:oxw5zs Ee3c:x.r xx zon sc=:ns xorzE 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 3x5 sIN vwa d D �EDR m FmAIB BEL011 ♦ d@ 5-101 5-1 � E e �3 x-- 5 € ------- -------------- ------ ------------- 8 -------- ------ ------- ------------- - ------------------------- TD.n am rov¢lam 'a a v"- .nam a¢nm aF1301 0.)A ¢]..Ua \\ a \ a Tov¢Nom a a A '`� MOLD ¢xm ¢zAa 1m n tnm / gc CN lai " s I b _b .._ I- ` a� I I ¢N.m I A. n1.aa ¢]Aa I I „ I I I I I I I B I - --I B$ mg i'-tl]/♦• }y-p B'-W Y-O• IT-C Y-C e•py m t ACCESS RAMP PLAN Y $cue,/.•.1•_0• ao STRUCTURAL GENERAL NOTES ERAV m JN BAIXinL 0. RFlwm®fdlalE2 q C-v IB'd 1. NDTR TO IM AFEImIN 6 ME siEC{ICATONS FOR 1, MAJINSIONSE s..OF GOXOiFTt AT SO B/.rs-SON)P9:NR ¢ k VARKEDO RFDm).rpp5f RISER PARS WAWA L IYGRONyEN1$^SMEµ ..I B1[S IS,YK RAm 0.♦0 AA.;SlII1P CYAW.IY YASSAONSSr -T NO MITAT. A.AAm 2n.3011,..R1 AiIER.nl vA1EN x45 BEd.. .115tf RE9AR m. CIWAm1. R10E5 i40$mON MW .&PWB Lm;Nq daMER IIE ABO'h Wll MSm SPEaI1GMws SIWL um AWLY m S OEMEOPoC.µDIMM 12LYNIG)OAI N6Gr IECON.W.,M15 91NL IXNCHIE IEVEI➢10 PAOS P IIaEO BY C(WIRACRA. B[fa1MhD Br 0E..lm LN EE NMEO OTE.M ME v. mY S.12m a'V�A Cp1RACr.'S. 2 u R9W W ACCOND.WCE wM AS 318 m'NSOC E SMmN.CCOE. ' 3/♦'CN WEER(Ti) 5^ TDI IEsr fgTM1l OAK) AS NOT A BE PPONIED.EURO.AND 3. NL B OON¢EYATMs PROViEO ARE Em xBLiWAMN p4r.Ntl 91NL Yp5)m1E0(ION.]OAK)A$VW NL ARLCAwE SECMIS IF iME BF RIO PABEO Br TE mI1RACTP. M As N9ROLE➢BY TE dOIEFA. mw M I0.m EL lam 3. B¢OY AND.1101 M dNE FOO.r OF Mf IC)I➢6V4 NN S RENTOR.1 ASIY.11 WR W wM FPDxr[OATHB NET AS.ATS B'COIC SLAB F TNO,....9M1 QGVA2 A. -Au$R10E5 MASS a N NO.) NoNro;LE1E111 511Au K MTASI .. S'Cl IC STAB PR6Vnr M9•ViE OF NL Eg5TN0 YAS MNNXTMr OOIW TO FABIKAm AND PLACED K Pd A P AS 3"MTANW YNIVN. p-e lx'.aCEY ¢EVAna SHOWN BI SEC. E FIIEQIxtENFq aEDNm(LPEA. m91.Y1 / -CEPT4.. M E 1T aEw u0-OEPM SE Mgglpar¢EA1E0 AND POSwx.5xE0 n- wEm m rmNW RAR.1l 3/♦'P1NN W aw EOSEO m OF CPICAE2.V.x.O ♦ PREPAAATm OF$lxla]L 9flLRILEs 511µL WQME RFYOVAL R S WONT RAN NO MONSON M APRP/AL SNPNNO ML RKPoSLO w0 Nl LmSE.RAOENIEU.OECCYPOSEO.N1Bµr w:ATalE➢.NID mISOAXOO1MNIT Np CONTROL J INT La A.AND PA4EudT 8_ llEL SOO y �M 1 ATTN2 SOCROC su�16Aa u a�MLAR AND NIGHT uaucE rw NL mxOErz PA1L Ce iMl{ER(EOEawCK IEPOIT 1T ANEAD B¢DY PIGHa¢D npribl 6 rOJIRP EIEVA W 9µ i N G AIEAs AT ME m11MAc1WY W11W.COIM2 LE. SONASS S. NL FON.91Au NAK xEaPEl1E TA1ERYu wA51ERS AS A.6E.TO PRDK[A YWtlb 911EAR rm PU .T OF SRLPED. ' ` FmnxGs mm mal: RaNx m1n mwnxB ApRAM Eau m NOgI/O O m II x/STTI Yaa S FOR dr LauMWS RLOY INC rm1W4 rmli T.TOLE ME 3mE � SNAWN 33 M-W-0 Dr SIItA YEEThIO Arn 'al. APLCAna �U o i4L Px a ME dsTYc BFLROY PNOTX"MODS.[ (A..mVARm u�ACT�WdY NSI�RU, SN AS BE w ACCOWAx[F wM g3 MD1CpW1aLL ME.AIq�pY1M.LCTP WA,ISON.M➢.IO TON.As g IT ROMEO TO.A.CE.11 LP MR AS MROhD er THE n NpKf TVBBED FINON•Ea1EOATELr VPm 5TnW9N0 FORMS As Q� dWmt RpER TO NN .SEOT.Fm RIMIER mrAAi SPOOFED IN SECmN 03 SO A FOR AL COIOIE2 SVIIFAM9 ESPOSEO TO (A Z NE.WMUMNn al NOT WIFD 1R....Y.AILS ABOIE ON.ON B. NEIP E12AVATd M AND STARE BY pAWNO AND....O mM..AND TOP Cf wAL CONCRC2 STASM SEEVAM WA.AS IEONEO. 9. MKRME FDRR1 fM RAMPS RICOI fINl91 1RIN4^hRSE m ' E ). m!IIRWrm alul vRamE sTOPm rmrvw(s)As NO sTAxmum MIRK MrAes n MµLS SH.NOT BE BACSFRIID am CWmER x.As AOYEYFD 1a COICIE2 mNDIO/RNINO mlMUlp H ¢-S♦x w ¢-swt 30.DAr R9ON s1R"BM As APPMISfO Br EWNE¢I.BUT W NO ON.ra FMLDMxO FMI NL xMZWTA AND tER DSxME2 + ______•_F___________s_________ ) : i ♦ ► s / cYIESS MAxi OATS. A�g�WILoimA�DE.'aEAN A Nf cmc POLTYm _ _ _ __ _______ __ _______ _ _ a Twy pNlFp.. BLE.'p E.0.N-MEM O.R"w'Br K1{Cm O2WCASA 1Y-B' Y-O' 1'-B' Y C<MACrfO 1'-B' T-0' n'-0' 3'-0' B'-0' T-N 1'-9 1. ALOWARE RCQmX RAIwMi CMAOIr.S.PM(RIRNB OI Sm) 0 GS.T CVIE 1.MA SOE.. .AIER 1 FIRS CAT Y¢TXC ASTM CIIVSwD$Tmf ..IT ATTIR BCCO P51(BENdO ON BECRmIt) CmC n W90p AS DPECIm.-3ARlr�A LSECO .TTNEAR M E 4d9ARA1oDI FST"nE W6ON 1r9mF aRO1MR-3110 . CONTO nm AFTER RfA NON SVA AMEN£TA All mI510.Vrnm-W1AlED t mTUI CAN rN" x/A -.T --1. ) CdiINIMX3 MAICATm$XAL R W$MCi ACIXNDAHM.M M 8 urzRA EMM PESAAE:x..Ox I-. APO vAWPACNRFA'eEWrlEN wsnNCMNS F SECTION A SECTION s ON oW m IEx."POAIM m m F Y . AY..L m PW a M`F1'.xr^"uF N 1- $E9Bc LOW.S,-OJL%...SC.VE' I/4'-I'-O" s-Im SONE:1/f-1'-O S-IOORCm Loms SR .m(PRNOSIlS D 31m SEA IEYEL PSE) 1. ..GS.3M SrA➢11OSS S..M 1A SATO!.wm OR.11. W 3 II I.mi PSf 5.p a 0.3OT 2 v4I05: m SA EIEC1Rtt6 Mn A01.1 B♦LV 3 fAOBc.:W ACCONC.wM I.A.EOTM OF NY R O E G REtAmxn vu Sp"VMATMS Q 2M SII 1. PAP'EE MNl ANS Fm.MPMEL AVMS(G)AT YAtlWY x♦'-O m AS ♦ EIEAMSIm SOLIx PB Sr�0 .SIE¢.M SrA .EI .T g V Z n n 91Ow4 u..0.(.M PORTS E,S AND P).NNI.wnu AW rmTxO (ld.a).SIR As 9p1W ON nE ONA.NGS. 34 ' o CU.N. CTd/COx1RO JmIS(C/CB AT..b-O m AS 9pd, (REFmdCE POINTS N Awl R) S. Da U.X.n n MAAIpRNL 91NL R Cm51R11c1FD U9111C issl/Y DA. R Pml$, M'2 N I] z MHM.T R SIAL S T ME FMONNM.m ME EAQNMR rm N9RWA, W AMM AcmA RnRDM1 PaMae 1s EIDORP. sa w RAAz,AND N.♦•-C NOT mAI9N,w/HEAR Wm3m FTBA1 m m PTONOE AY.1"-m M ME RETAMII'GHAT PA.Aro"OBE SEEr AND NO.1)se MLLWc II101 As sSRFB. T 9pxwB NIr CT TOO5 m Rmf/3➢FmTNG Aw aEOEIX 1. NL ALWMR111E16 EYRmm m m CmrAR wM mlmElF 9141 R ~ ERVATOIS.910ECT m FN9Ed's AWROVu. CWIm wM OmuASM PNVT. nj BnME USIXC�1 ACE OF W IEKT, SUP f��' ALS 1 2 3 4 5 6 ' 1 2 3 4 5 6 ' of C- lf GmNM A GHAUM W P.M...M E3 2 is $iNAE S,m.w/ GTAGZ 51En RMINO W/ e m g e jP 9/.LVSIFAS O f CC BIWSMG o f EG g SIt CNWiER(T9) JI.•CX.YO[R(rrP) °= wN%INC ANL-5EE CIMI YNfY Y.�-SE L-lol °•i WNNMO M.IR-56 ONL 4a A A vivnim° a€ sNW A.NwW1(in) j `I sNW RGeeEo rwY1(NP) °•Au xous zN'-v ac N'Y WEP xeas 21 IY..SGK EXWE IY MCH GA I ' on ' '3 Fu SER WorEaWYCN RERGAr � � ??qqaa Au NR uorzawuL REwRr �B ux1 Ewsnxc n am I I � N oxsnxG a am I I F n €�` ' p e IY auW p e lY aux a'QA a•M 2'b'WM OIU91Ee A. T ep J'6R Y4 WCE PIV92e SidE pWHK[UIER Wf1PGID p pell/.CE UHR MfMPEo IN °0 e I V l\Zf i CEMIXn1E SE➢M°npl fMR1G °B O 10'EQP i I QOTSR[SdM/.Tpl FA°RIC A € I 1 I I H 'g I 1 I I eoir°v OF Poonxc AS � 3 p ooms a I w ooY¢s a REwmm ra wl z°•aPM iA IR L\Zf I IW°EP x RGGGeA JWIi I II I p .,w acv RGGWGI cwr I I ro I�� I I a•NA nr a wr w o Io•our p e Iw Guw ro I/°�NILL 1 I s'nA rov s GOJ ' B ) ) .Ye11MW \ ) aeIV WEw m ms B e>} � wR 1 • •_ ____ ___________________ _ i i o m I'-Y Y-T I•_J•ag AVG IY CWP.A °IpS W4TED QVSxm Xo w CEOTTIIE ' ISEPM°TVI FASGC CG'EL5 a 2f M Y/ EYSTNC BEfPNt m m•-a' 6GXr War(T9 2 I Irlm HfiM m RG`G sr/AGFREp) NL W8M EGOXY CGXTD PFA I.SA°]IS IEYW[BFLgp]f M REGARm ro womE 1. °u aGNR FPCxv mxrzo Pw MM vna z. WOxGE IINL C<W1R0.W CCN51MIcAWKWAa.CNIS ♦YupWY ll SLq£ EVA.4YMi E.1W rN{-LCCNTWS 910e1 W F/.X. 2. NMN Cf HILL CWA0.E W Eu.M RWSMICTCN/CelA4lW1S ' M si UW W PN -LOGsnaxs slow)W PLM. a. woumE cW WET:Wwxc/seNnM cGlaWxo PW Nu cWNerE snaMEs. a. PmME GMGEIE Wwxc/suxc mmWlxo PW nu caxWErz sAPYfES. SOIL BEARING SECTION C BEDROCK BEARING SECTION Y..VL t/Y-I'-V ' J r I4Oimr a N�r a s OAu MEI R . C" o•(n) R W 2 t A V O_ Q � W IS-0'OL YXX PI. . IS-0'OL YM 5oA.G 2 RE1Xrtl1eXG(In) g pSCCxT A L ArFIM°M 6•M'WXrERSIFP s B UD I YI I SIAB-CN-GAME AS. } °xW �N I®VWOIM (pEeMm eryr rW RSrnxw'W.1us iEx NMO 4c1Ib15 /M Ylx MIEM.IWIr Is uPD IS• I \ � I MpnWA RAG, S MSnB MWIEA CLNSTNCIKN/CW1RQ JEMT /� FACM SCE E/. T fLR 5[A.Mi FER 0.NI5 RlM1EM/AE YI2.Wi E WnYNG IIY YM) I / \\ iNW(TIP) IIAO) 11/T *�—T��- AS RE .1 AAA AAA WALL CONTROL JOINT / k . ,, ,EI-ImT.GIAN, ' ,•P UFYuW.EIrmxm GAXW uwrYYM g :•-o• IY PWu12Mis uo Pcnon mNWert sarml.nW Isy 2 a GG ' DO _ YM YM I NglEs' <<N YJ -1, OO XM dI IIAWp 1 LAM A ISIAPICEYWr N 3 N D z .MXr WNL G<s m..N m 12..MrW NMEYENI SLAB ISOLATION JOINT `o G^, to 2t.y� Im 110A xA s WALL OPENING �� SLAB SAWED JOINT (SJ) 2' o °' ' e S°NIE A°N9 N W/ _IW SC/1L xls s-Im SL.GL xl5 �g6pif uwnc �t9 Ma OIEG W aas R svu(rn) I/._ o• aNA.un+w . 10 \STEPPED FOOTING f«ffx GPMwf SGNE SCNF:.S x 5«fFl10, OF W ttNE xA KDAC E OF WENT SSM B IN u SQL S-101 1 2 3 4 5 6