Loading...
1983-1988 DRB MEETING MINUTES 9 P' DRB MINUTES` 1983 1988_ ; f Salem Redevelopment 44-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744 4580 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD December Z8, 1988 AGENDA 1. Roll Call Debra Hilbert Chris Greene Anne Farnam Frederick Johnson John Willand Timothy Clarke Dale Yale -= Z. Approval of minutes of November 30, 1988. 3. Discussion/New Business 1. Museum Place Renovations EZWP DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MINUTES DECEMBER 28, 1988 The Design Review Board met in open session on Wednesday, December 28, 1988, at 8:30 a.m. in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green. Those in attendance were: Chris Greene, Anne Farnam, and Dale Yale. Mark Audette, Robin Wunderlich, and Michael Harrington were present to discuss the design changes to Museum Place. Robin Wunderlich explained that as a result of the last DRB meeting, a design for a pedestrian walkway on Essex Street has been added. The entranceway is setback to the original facade, and it is 12 feet wide at its narrowest point. Mr. Wunderlich also showed plans for the extension of the Essex Street storefronts which are similar in design to the Essex Court storefronts, and plans for the new primary entrance to Museum Place. The existing entrance will become retail space, and no alteration of the existing landscape will result in the entrance redesign. Mr. Harrington explained to the Board that the Social Security office will be moved to the first floor along with the National Park Service Visitors' Center and that the District Attorney's office will occupy the second floor. Mr. Harrington expressed the need to obtain the necessary approvals so that the storefront extension process could begin so that these tenants could be relocated in a timely fashion. Mr. Luster asked for confirmation in the ownership of the walkway which was being utilized for retail space and whether the City had easements over it. Mr. Audette replied that the mall owner owned the property without easements. Chris Greene asked what other changes would take place in the mall. Mr. Harrington replied that exterior changes to the Church Street facade will begin in the spring. He also informed the Board that the game room will no longer be in the mall, which will result in additional storefront space on the Church Street facade. At this time Mr. Harrington expressed his concern over the management of the parking garage. He would like to see the garage under private ownership or management. Let the record show that Fred Johnson joined the meeting at this time. After the Board reviewed the design plans in further detail, they expressed their concern over signage for the individual storefronts. They also questioned why the door to the walkway was asymmetrical with the other storefronts. They felt that a master plan for signage should be prepared for the building. They also suggested that more detailed drawings and samples of colors and materials be presented to the Board. Dale Yale made a motion to approve the design of the improvements to Museum Place which includes, the extension of the storefronts, the pedestrian accessway, and the new primary entrance at McGowan's subject to the approval of details, materials, signage, and colors of the above improvements. Such approval is granted so that the developers may obtain a building permit to begin construction. However, the developer agrees to return to gain approval for the remaining items. Chris Greene seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submitted, William E. Luster M4SWP rnru Sale. .- Redevelopment Authority :SAA thorit\g TELEPHONE 744.6900 ai"'9�,J� e tl�41 Jy ONE SALEM GREEN. SALEn4. MASSACHUSETTS 01970 744-4580 To: SRA Board Members i From: Design Review Board Re: Museum Place Date: December 28, 1988 On December Z8, 1988, the Design Review Board recommended approval of the design of the improvements to Museum Place to allow the proposed expansion along Essex Street, and construction of the new primary entrance at McGowan's. Specifically, the DRB recommended approval of the following: • - Design of the storefronts along Essex Street, excluding materials and colors. - Design of the new primary entrance, excluding materials and colors. - Design of the proposed entrance and "cut-through" from Essex Street to Church Street, as recommended by the SRA. This approval will allow the developer to begin construction of the proposed improvements while ensuring that specific design issues relative to materials, colors, and signage can be further reviewed and approved by the Design Review Board and the Redevelopment Authority. In order to facilitate construction as approved, the developer requests approval of the DRB's recommendation as outlined above. M45WP SalemffE 40 Redevelopment ut�r9[9��144-6900 o ity ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 7 �fp744-4580 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD November 30, 1988 AGENDA 1. Roll Call Chris Greene Anne Farnam Frederick Johnson John Willand Timothy Clarke Dale Yale 2. Approval of minutes of September 21, 1988. 3. Discussion/New Business 1. East India Mall Renovations Z. T.R. Kerr Building 3. Downtown Period Lighting M42 WP DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MINUTES NOVEMBER 30, 1988 i The Design Review Board met in open session on Wednesday, November 30, 1988 at 8:30 a.m. in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green. Those in attendance were: Tim Clarke, Fred Johnson, John Willand, Dale Yale, and Bill Luster. 1. Museum Place (East India Mall) Renovations Messrs. Michael Harrington, Robin Wunderlich, and Mark Audette appeared before the Board with a presentation for renovations to the East India Mall newly named Museum Place. Before the formal review process began, Mr. Luster informed the Board that the SRA has seen preliminary plans for the Museum Place and has asked the DRB to be aware that the SRA would like to see a direct connection from Church Street to Essex Street, through the Mall, incorporated into the plans. The SRA also suggested that some type of signage and a pedestrian walkway be placed on the Essex Street facade that could be seen and accessed from Central Street. Mr. Audette, the new mall manager (Medallion Corporation Management Company) • explained to the DRB that the goal of the changes is to bring some warmth to the structure and to make it more inviting to the public. The proposed renovations entail bringing out the storefronts on the Essex Street facade, adding an awning over the storefronts for cover and to bring color to the buildin , and relocating the entranceway. Mr. Wunderlich explained that the storefronts will be brought out and be similar in design to the new storefront facades of the Essex Court Condominiums. Each storefront will have its own entrance and a canvas awning will be placed over the facades. The new entrance way will have a copper roof and people will enter into a glass kiosk area. Above the entrance will be the mall's new logo which is a fan shaped design as shown in the drawings presented. Mr. Clarke asked whether the second floor of the mall would be brought out. Mr. Wunderlich replied in the negative. Mr. Audette informed the Board that a direct access way to Church Street would be difficult because of the current placement of the mechanical rooms and off- street parking garage stairwell, but some type of access is being designed which would be approximately eight to thirteen foot wide. Placement of this walkway has not been determined yet. Mr. Johnson asked whether the new storefront design would impact the existing landscaping beds on the pedestrian mall Mr. Wunderlich replied that the design has minimal impact on the landscaping. • Mr. Clarke questioned where the tenants' signage would be placed. Mr. Wunderlich responded that signage could be place above the doors, in this case the transoms shown would have to be removed. Mr. Willand suggested that the signage could be placed on the piers next to the entranceways. He also suggested that lights could be placed on the piers. I r 1 I � , • Mr. Audette suggested that painted windows could be a sign alternative. He informed that Board that this issue has not been thought through thoroughly and the suggestions of the Board would be taken into consideration. The Board also stated that all the signs should be uniform. Mr. Willand stated that the broad concept of the renovations are fine, but requested detailed drawings of all of the changes. He especially requested large scaled detailed drawings of the storefronts and of the proposed walkway. He also requested photographs of the existing mall and streetscape to visualize the impact of the renovations. Dale Yale excused herself from the meeting at this time. T.R. Kerr Building Mr. Donald Burnham and Ms. Linda King (CSS Architects) appeared before the DRB with design amendments to the windows and the awnings of the Kerr Building. Mr. Burnham explained that the building is now being gutted and the DRB had a previous concern with the window design, specifically the larger windows on the second floor. The amendment for consideration is to make the windows smaller and introduce more brick and columns to obtain a more Federal style building as shown on the revised plans. The brick panels between the new windows will be recessed. Mr. Burnham continued that this change alleviates the need for the large awning that spanned the Washington Street facade. Therefore, the second amendment is to just construct the awning the entranceways of the building. • Mr. Willand suggested that the material G4RC be used to obtain clean crisp lines on the corners. Mr. Burnham responded that he will look into this. Mr. Johnson felt that there was no rhythm to the building because each floor was different. He felt that the dormers should be spaced out differently so that they do not look like they were "applied" to the building. Mr. Willand felt the dormers should be kept as is. He also questioned what the window materials were. Ms. King responded that the windows will all be 8/1, metal, double hung windows. Mr. Willand approved of the concept of the changes. He was concerned that the front door of the building was too simple, and stressed again the need for greater articulation of the corners, bandings, and lines of the building. He requested to see samples of the materials going to be used on the bandings and the corners. Downtown Period Lighting Mr. Luster showed plans to the DRB to replace the existing shoe box lighting in the downtown over the next three to four years. There are two lights being considered. One is an acorn style light, and the other is a more colonial light similar to the ones on the Common. The acorn light is easier to maintain, and throws more light than the colonial one. Mr. Luster explained that this project which has been initiated by the City of Salem and the Salem Partnership will be done in the following phases: • Phase I - 1989 - 14 fixtures - from Liberty St. to the Peabody Museum Phase II - 1990 - 10 fixtures - from Museum Place to the Salem Five Phase III - 1991 - 8 fixtures - from Salem Five to Washington Street Mr. Willand did not prefer one light over another, but he did state that he felt the mall was rather contemporary and did not feel the existing lights were bad. Mr. Johnson stated that he would also prefer modern lights, but he did prefer the colonial light to the acorn one. Mr. Luster thanked the Board for their input. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Bill Luster M45WP • Dk)3 - gov, 34, N89 • Mr. Audette suggested that painted windows could be a sign alternative. He informed that Board that this issue has not been thought through thoroughly and the suggestions of the Board would be taken into consideration. The Board also stated that all the signs should be uniform. Mr. Willand stated that the broad concept of the renovations are fine, but requested detailed drawings of all of the changes. He especially requested large scaled detailed drawings of the storefronts and of the proposed walkway. He also requested photographs of the existing mall and streetscape to visualize the impact of the renovations. Dale Yale excused herself from the meeting at this time. T.R. Kerr Building Mr. Donald Burnham and Ms. Linda King (CSS Architects) appeared before the DRB with design amendments to the windows and the awnings of the Kerr Building. Mr. Burnham explained that the building is now being gutted and the DRB had a previous concern with the window design, specifically the larger windows on the second floor. The amendment for consideration is to make the windows smaller and introduce more brick and columns to obtain a more Federal style building as shown on the revised plans. The brick panels between the new windows will be recessed. Mr. Burnham continued that this change alleviates the need for the large awning that spanned the Washington Street facade. Therefore, the second amendment is to just construct the awning the entranceways of the building. • Mr. Willand suggested that the material G4RC be used to obtain clean crisp lines on the corners. Mr. Burnham responded that he will look into this. Mr. Johnson felt that there was no rhythm to the building because each floor was different. He felt that the dormers should be spaced out differently so that they do not look like they were "applied" to the building. Mr. Willand felt the dormers should be kept as is. He also questioned what the window materials were. Ms. King responded that the windows will all be 8/1, metal, double hung windows. Mr. Willand approved of the concept of the changes. He was concerned that the front door of the building was too simple, and stressed again the need for greater articulation of the corners, bandings, and lines of the building. He requested to see samples of the materials going to be used on the bandings and the corners. Downtown Period Lighting Mr. Luster showed plans to the DRB to'replare the existin shoe ' ox lighting in the downtown over the next three to four years. There are two lights being considered. One is an acorn style light, and the other is a more colonial light similar to the ones on the Common. The acorn light is easier to maintain, and throws more light than the colonial one. Mr. Luster explained that this project which has been initiated by the City of Salem and the Salem Partnership will be done in the following phases: Phase I - 1989 - 14 fixtures - from Liberty St. to the Peabody Museum • Phase II - 1990 - 10 fixtures - from Museum Place to the Salem Five Phase III - 1991 - 8 fixtures - from Salem Five to Washington Street k SalemEE 0 Redevelopment 4-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744-4580 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD September 21, 1988 AGENDA 1. Roll Call Debra Hilbert Chris Greene Anne Farnam Frederick Johnson John Willand Timothy Clarke Dale Yale • 2. Approval of minutes of August 17, 1988. 3. Discussion/New Business 1. Corporate Design Insurance Agency/30 Federal Street - Sign Permit 2. Sterdu Furs/191 Essex Street - Sign Permit 3. Body Talk/6 Front Street - Awning Permit 4. Walgreens Development 5. Suites Hotel M42WP DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MINUTES SEPTEMBER 21, 1988 On Wednesday, September 21, 1988, the Design Review Board met in open session in the second floor conference room of One Salem Green. Those in attendance were: John Willand, Tim Clarke, and Dale Yale. The first item on the agenda was to approve the minutes of the meeting held on August 17, 1988. There being no omissions or corrections to the minutes, Dale Yale made a motion to approve the minutes as presented. Tim Clarke seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Sterdu Furs The first application presented to the Board was one for two 14"x8' signs to be erected on the building located at 191 Essex Street as shown on the submitted photographs. The signs are wood and have a background of Carmine (maroon) and have 22 Karat gold leaf letters and edging with the letter styling being claredon bold. After some discussion, a motion was made by Dale Yale to approve the sign as presented. Tim Clarke seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Body Talk The next application presented to the Board was for the erection of three awnings • located on the property at 6 Front Street. The awnings will be turquoise in color and have Body Talk written in white lettering. After some discussion, a motion was made by Time Clarke to approve the application as presented. John Willand seconded the motion. All were in favor, motion so carried. Corporate Design Insurance Agency, Incorporated The third application presented to the Board was for the erection of a sign to be located on the second floor of the building at 30 Federal Street. The sign is 12'x2' and has 23 Karat Gold Leaf Letters. The sign will be bolted directly into the cement. The Board raised several questions regarding the size and placement of the sign. The Board suggested that the DRB guidelines be researched in regards to the size of a sign which is located on the second floor of a building. Mr. Luster suggested that the Board approve the sign with the condition that it complies with the guidelines. Dale Yale made a motion to approve the sign as presented with the above noted condition. Tim Clarke seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submitted, • Bill Luster M44TvP L LH U11 SalemffM Redevelopment 44-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744 -4580 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD August 17, 1988 AGENDA 1. Roll Call Debra Hilbert Chris Greene Anne Farnam Frederick Johnson John Willand Timothy Clarke Dale Yale • Z. Approval of minutes of July 13, 1988. 3. Discussion/New Business 1. Alex Panos/Front Street Z. Atlantic Computer/32 Church Street 3. Tierney, Kalis, Adamopoulos & Lucas/133 Washington Street 4. Support Service Unlimited/230 Essex Street 5. Bursaw Oil/38 Norman Street 6. Mailboxes Etc./203 Washington Street 7. Suites Hotel EZWP • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD • MINUTES JULY 13, 1988 A Design Review Board meeting was held on Wednesday, July 13, 1988, at 8:30 a.m. in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green, Salem, MA. Those in attendance were: Tim Clarke, Chris Greene, Debra Hilbert, Fred Johnson, John Willand and Dale Yale. Alex's Place - Front Street The first item on the agenda was an application for a sign permit at Alex's Place located on Front Street. The proposal included changing the awning colors and replacing Alex's Place with Alex & Lucille and the words Image Concept with a new logo to be placed on the valance of the awning. The same frame will be used. The Board requested a scaled drawing of the awning showing the placement of the new lettering and logo and color samples to be submitted to the Board before any action could be taken. George Osgood - 275 Derby Street Mr. George Osgood appeared before the Board with a proposal to replace his existing storefront with a new aluminum storefront, new windows, and a 1" insulated glass and bronze door. His plans also call for the removal of the existing • garage doors to be replaced with windows as shown in the plans presented. Mr. Osgood explained that he has already repointed the building and is in the process leasing space to several interested tenants. Mr. Clarke felt that the proposal was a positive step in rehabilitating this dilapidated building. The Board expressed their concern over the placement of the metal panels on the storefronts. Mr. Osgood replied that the panels were placed in the shown position in order to allow for a second floor to be constructed. The Board felt that the second floor could be recessed approximately three feet and that glass should replace the metal panels. Mr. Osgood agreed with the suggestion, but replied that in certain places the metal panel would have to be used. Mr. Willand also suggested that the door be widened and the lower metal panel surrounding the door be removed. The Board was also concerned with the vertical banding shown on the plans. They suggested that the windows be redesigned to read as a grid and both horizontal and vertical banding be flush, and also the window banding be moved to make three equal size windows. Chris Greene made a motion to approve the proposal with the conditions that the middle panel be glass and not metal, that the three glass panels be made equal in size, that the door side panels be changed to glass and door widened, the horizontal and vertical bandings be flush, the bandings be bronze in color, and the glass be clear. Dale Yale seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Mr. Osgood was then instructed to submit updated drawings with the changes required as listed above. W algreeens • Marsha Cini and Robin Wunderlich appeared before the Board with updated plans of the Walgreens development. Ms. Cini explained that she has had a preliminary meeting with the Chairman of the Planning Board in order to prepare for their public hearing. She explained that the plan currently calls for 16 angled parking spaces on the side of the building. There is now a proposal to make the street one way in order to alleviate traffic concerns posed by such parking configuration. There were also no major concerns expressed regarding the proposed loading dock. The common entryway which accesses the courtyard and office space will remain as shown, but the entryway to Walgreens will be relocated to the opposite side, and windows will be placed in the bays along the front and continue around to the first four bays on the side facade. The remaining bays will consist of a masonry infill with decorative glazing highlights. There will be a three foot kneewall of rusticated block. Ms. Cini also asked the Board if they would be in favor of a phased project, meaning the construction of the first floor with the upper stories to be constructed at a latter time, because of marketing problems at the present time. The Board expressed their concern for the construction of a single story building on the site, their ability to review a one story building without plans to reflect the upper stories, and also questioned how the developer would guarantee the construction of the remaining floors at a latter date. The Board was not receptive to the idea. Ms. Hilbert expressed her concern regarding the method of screening on the corner of New Derby and Dodge Streets. Ms. Cini replied that the building cannot be extended to the end of the corner but the developers will submit a landscape plan • for the treatment of the area. Mr. Willand suggested that some type of entrance pavilion be constructed, or leave the column as shown but put the entrance on a diagonal. He also suggested that the cornice on the building be made deeper. The Board questioned the design of the loading area and requested detailed drawings of the proposed plans and sidewalk paver design. They also requested detailed drawings of the planting strips. After more discussion, the Board requested the following: 1. Detailed drawings of the revised front corner entrance Z. Detailed drawings of the rear loading area 3. Detailed drawings e.g. cornice relationship, lintels etc. and specific materials 4. Walgreens signage 5. Detailed drawings of site issues e.g. loading dock, planting strips, entranceways 6. Detailed drawings for revitalization of Eaton's Building, and courtyard 7. Bay Bank exterior design. Suites Hotel Mr. Richard Ness and Messrs. Victor Vitols and Jone-Hui Hu appeared before the DRB to respond to the comments of the last meeting. The first item addressed was the continuity of the streetscape along Derby Street. In order to facilitate this request the architects presented plans to the Board showing a metal or wooden fence with planters and lighting fixtures in front of the parking area on Derby Street to create a buffer zone between building heights and also proposed the use of different colored pavers encompassing the entrance. The use of the planters and • other landscaping will serve as screening for the parking lot as well. The second concern addressed was the need for more articulation on the corner of the parcel. The corner has been redesigned to a 450 angle and the windows have been realigned in each bay. There has also been planters added to the entranceway. The third change has been the extension of the metal panel up to eye level to better screen the parking garage area. There has also been more planting added for screening. The space above the panels can be blank glass or have a grid pattern. Ms. Hilbert expressed her concern regarding the height and weight of the fence. She felt the fence should be more dense, the rod size should be expanded, and the fence be higher. Mr. Willand asked if the fence protruded from the building. Mr. Vitols replied that the fence is flush with the building. The Board also questioned the size of the parking lot entranceway. They felt the opening should be 20 feet instead of 24 feet. The Board noticed that some windows over the garage door opening were smaller than the others and were not symmetrically placed; the Board asked that the windows be made full height or that the panel be analyzed to be made symmetrical. The Board also requested to see drawings of the proposed signage, to see detailed drawings of the windows, cornice lines, etc. The Board also requested that there be some relationship between the fence and the garage grids. Other Business • Debra Hilbert made a motion to approve the DRB minutes from the meetings held on June 1, 1988, and June 22, 1988. Chris Greene seconded the motion. All were in favor, motion so carried. Chris Greene asked the status of the Riley Plaza Redesign. Mr. Luster explained to the Board the permitting process involved regarding the project and also showed the Board design plans and explained the proposed reconfiguration of the Plaza. Mr. Luster informed the Board that he would try to make arrangements with the architectural firm of Rizzo Associates to appear before the Board to explain the plans in greater detail. There being no further business, Debra Hilbert made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Chris Greene seconded the motion. All were in favor, motion so carried. Respectfully submitted, Ellen S. Dubinsky M40 WP • • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MINUTES August 17, 1988 The Design Review Board met in open session on August 17, 1988, at 6:00 p.m. Those in attendance were: Debra Hilbert, Tim Clarke, and Fred Johnson. The first order of business was to review the minutes of the Design Review Board meeting held on July 13, 1988. Tim Clarke made a motion to accept the minutes as presented. Debra Hilbert seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Atlantic Computer 32 Church Street - Sign Permit Barbara Rosenstein of Atlantic Computer presented a sign application for a right angle sign at 32 Church Street for the new Atlantic Computer Service Center. The sign measures 4' x 3', and has a tartan red background to match the existing trim color of the building. The letters are painted gold with a black outline. The sign will be suspended ten feet above the street by a black wrought iron bracket as shown. Fred Johnson commented that the type was difficult to read and should be changed from 6 inches in height to 5 inches. Fred Johnson made a motion to approve the sign as presented with the condition that the height of letters be changed from 6 inches to 5 inches. Debra Hilbert seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so y,• carried. Tierney, Kalis, Adamopoulos & Lucas 133 Washington Street - Sign Permit Attorney Adamopoulos appeared before the Board with an application to move the Sawtell Stationers sign and erect a new sign for the law offices located at 133 Washington Street. Mr. Adamopoulos explained that the Sawtell's sign will be moved and centered over the right portion of the sign band and a new sign consisting of two lines, 23' in length and 14" in height, made of the same letter style and texture, be erected on the left portion of the sign band to read as presented. Mr. Adamopoulos explained that there has been some consideration in changing the scale of the sign by changing the heights of the lettering. Fred Johnson suggested that no changes be made to the scale of the sign. The Board also expressed their concern that the material match the existing lettering and that the entire sign band be repainted before any signage is applied. Debra Hilbert made a motion to accept the sign application as presented, with the conditions that the entire sign band be painted and the new letters match the existing material in color, finish, and type style. If there is to be any changes in the size of the letter heights the application will have to be resubmitted for approval. Tim Clarke seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Support Services Unlimited 230 Essex Street - Sign Permit Nancy Powlowsky presented an application for a sign at 230 Essex Street. The sign • will be located in the existing sign box. The sign is wooden with gray lettering and a maroon background. The type style used will match the company's logo. Fred Johnson made a motion to accept the sign application as presented. Debra Hilbert seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. • John Willand joined the meeting at this time. Bursaw Oil Corporation 38 Norman Street - Sign Permit Anthony Guba of Bursaw Oil Corporation presented an application for the replacement of an existing free standing sign with a new 17' x 6", 24 square foot, internally illuminated free standing sign. It was explained that the sign ordinance governing this board does not allow free standing signs. Mr. Guba replied that he was aware of this fact, but felt the new sign with the new Texaco logo was an improvement, and if this sign was not approved, the existing would remain. Mr. Guba went on to explain that the station has been renovated over the past two months to reflect the new design images set forth by the corporation, and there was no flexibility regarding the design or materials of the sign. The Board felt that the sign was an improvement to the site, they felt that as long as the Board of Appeal approves the sign, they would recommend the change. Tim Clarke made a motion to approve the sign as presented. Fred Johnson seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Mailboxes Etc. 203 Washington Street - Sign Permit Charles Gore presented a sign application to the Board for his new business in the Eaton's Block at 203 Washington Street. Because of the impending restoration of the building, the Board recommended that he withdraw his original application and place temporary signage on the building. The Board felt an aluminum painted sign with a four inch backing so that the sign will be consistent with the rest of the building should be erected as a temporary sign. Mr. Gore asked the Board if a plexi-glass panel listing the services of the building could be hung in the window. The Board requested a sample of this signage. Fred Johnson made a motion to approve an aluminum painted temporary sign with a four inch backing to be erected for six months or until the building restoration is completed, whichever is earlier. The panel signs in the windows will be approved when a picture is presented and approved by the DRB staff. Tim Clarke seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Alex & Lucilles, Image Concepts 16 Front Street - Awning A new awning design was presented to the Board for the replacement of the awning located at 16 Front Street. The new awning will be dark green and Alex & Lucilles Image Concepts with their new logo will be lettered on the awning. The existing awning frame will be used. Fred Johnson made a motion to accept the awning and design and presented. Debra Hilbert seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. • t _.. ., .Suites Hotel • Richard Ness and Jone-Hui Hu appeared before the Board with updated drawings for the Suites Hotel project. Mr. Ness asked the Board if they could draft a letter of design approval to be used in obtaining bank financing. Ms. Hilbert responded that the Board has never done anything like this, and felt that the DRB minutes should be used, since they show that the Board is taking action in regards to this project. John Willand expressed his concern over the configuration of the building. He felt that other options should be explored before the concept of a long rectangular building is approved. The Board is concerned about the existing massing, shape, and placement on the lot of the building; they are concerned about the traffic circulation on the corner and the street continuity along Derby Street. Mr. Ness explained to the Board the changes that were made regarding the density of the window garage grills, and the widening the of the entryway from six feet to ten feet, blocking the window opening with brick, and adding more planters. He also showed locations for the new street trees to be planted. John Willand felt that these changes do not adequately address the main concerns of this Board. The Board suggested that more of the site be used with less surface parking. They felt that this building design cannot be justified unless other drawings, or explanations be presented to show that this is the optimum design. They were also concerned about the continuity along Derby Street and the visibility issue, since the building sits so close to the corner. Mr. Ness explained that there have been many different designs experimented with, but he felt that this shape was the most efficient and meets the existing zoning requirements. Mr. Ness agreed to make a presentation at the next meeting which would include the previous designs and shapes of the building so that the Board could see how this particular design was chosen. Other Business Mr. Luster informed that Board that the Boston Society of Architects would like to send a focus group to Salem to participate in the review process. The Board agreed that this would be an exciting proposition provided that their role be purely advisory. Ms. Hilbert explained that the Salem Partnership, a newly established entity comprised of city officials and local businesses has set up an Historical Resources sub-committee which would like to have some input into the design process of new buildings and restoration projects within the City. This proposal will be discussed at a later meeting. There being no other business, the meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Ellen S. Dubinsky M41WP Salem Redevelopment 4-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744-4580 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD July 13, 1988 AGENDA 1. Roll Call Debra Hilbert Chris Greene Anne Farnam Frederick Johnson John Willand Timothy Clarke Dale Yale • Z. Approval of minutes of June 1, 1988, and June ZZ, 1988. 3. Discussion/New Business 1. George Osgood/Derby Street Z. Alex Panos/Front Street 3. Walgreens Development 4. Suites Hotel EZWP DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Minutes •' June 22, 1988 The Design Review Board met at 8:30 a.m. on June 22, 1988, in the conference room at One Salem Green. Those in attendance were: Tim Clarke, Chris Greene, Debra Hilbert, John Willand, and Dale Yale. Salem Evening News Sign Permit Mr. Kenneth Newbegin of the Salem Evening News appeared before the Board with a proposal for two roof signs to be placed on the Salem Evening News building at 155 Washington Street. One sign will be located on the corner of Front and Washington Streets, and the other on Derby Street (as shown on plan). The sign will be made of aluminum and will be 20 feet by 3 feet. The sign will have a gray background with black lettering and the Salem News logo will be red. All paint will be semi-gloss. The Board felt that the design was appropriate, and after some discussion Debra Hilbert made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Chris Greene seconded the motion. All were in favor, motion so carried. South River Proposal Tim Clarke excused himself from commenting during this discussion. Attorney John Serafini Sr., Victor Vitols, and Richard Ness presented plans for a suites hotel on • the corner of New Derby and Congress Streets. Mr. Vitols explained that the type of building planned would be very appropriate for the wharf area. After a presentation of the proposal and a brief review of the plans, Chris Greene stated his concern over the lack of a front yard for the building. He was also concerned about the visibility of cars seen through the openings on the street level of the garage. Mr. Vitols suggested that some type of screening device could be designed to better camouflage the cars. John Willand was also concerned with the openings in the garage, and questioned whether the garage could be enclosed and a mechanical ventilation system installed. The architect will look into this possibility. He also requested that the bull-nose facade of the building be better detailed. Debra Hilbert commented on the fact that the building looked "squeezed" into its Congress Street frontage. Mr. Vitols responded that the building complies with all site and zoning by- laws of the City. Mr. Ness thanked the Board for its comments and will address the concerns raised, and have more detailed plans to present at the next DRB meeting. Church Court Condominiums Richard Ness presented design changes for the CVS wall and door treatments. After some discussion, the Board approved the plans as presented. • Essex Court Condominiums • The Board did a site visit to review a sample of the brick panel at the Essex Court Condominiums. Upon inspection and review the board approved the brick as designed. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Bill Luster • (M39WP) • r� SalemER Redevelopment 44-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744 4580 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD June 1, 1988 AGENDA 1. Roll Call Debra Hilbert Chris Greene Anne Farnam Frederick Johnson John Willand Timothy Clarke Dale Yale 2. Approval of minutes of March 2, 1988. 3. Discussion/New Business 1. Preliminary Design - Walgreens Development Z. Brick Panel Review - Essex House Condominiums E2WP • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Minutes June 1, 1988 The Design Review Board met at 8:30 a.m. on June 1, 1988, in the conference room at One Salem Green. Those in attendance were: Tim Clarke, Debra Hilbert, Fred Johnson, and John Willand. A motion was made by Fred Johnson to approve the minutes of the meeting held on March 2, 1988. Debra Hilbert seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Walgreens Development Attorney William Quinn, Marsha Cini, and Robin Wunderlich appeared before the Board with preliminary design plans for a new construction and restoration project. The plans call for a new three story building to be erected on the site of the former Mr. Grocer building. The first floor will be occupied by Walgreens, which has signed a twenty year lease for 11,000 sq. ft. of retail space, and the upper two stories will be first-class office space. There are plans to install an elevator in the building, but its location has not been determined. The new building will be connected to the existing Eaton's building, which is scheduled for restoration work. The site plan, as presented, calls for a rectangular shaped building with approximately 14 on-site parking spaces, which are proposed to be located on the • side of the building. Construction should begin in the fall after the project receives the necessary approvals from the Board of Appeal, Planning Board, Design Review Board, and the Salem Redevelopment Authority. Mr. Quinn informed the Board that Eaton's will no longer occupy the corner space. A Bay Bank will be the new tenant. Preliminary design drawings were shown to the Board which included some type of glass enclosure to connect the two buildings and be used as public space. At the present time Walgreens has requested that no windows be placed on the New Derby Street facade, because they intend to use the wall for shelving, storage, and displays. Walgreens requested a loading area be provided as shown on the plans, as well as the on-site parking provision. The materials proposed for the structure are red brick with concrete or granite detailing, bottom floor treatment of a rough textured material and upper floors will be treated with a smoother textured materials of the same color. Bill Luster informed the Board that as a result of this development, the City was awarded an $850,000 CDAG for public improvements to the area. Such improvements include: tree planting, landscaping, installation of curb cuts, and installation of period lighting. After some discussion, the Board expressed the following concerns: 1. The need to camouflage or redesign the proposed loading area. 2. The need to better define or move the entrance to Walgreens. 3. The development of a signage package for the entire development. 4. Exploration of the possibility to have windows on the New Derby Street facade. • 5. The alleviation of the danger of cars backing out onto a public way. 6. The request of more detailed drawings of the exterior changes to the Bay Bank facade. 7. The need to provide continuity to the street facade and eliminate the view of a parking lot by plantings and/or redesigning entranceway to Walgreens. • 8. The need to address the danger of too much glass being mistreated by the occupants(Walgreens). 9. The need to see more detailed drawings of the new structure, and more detail of materials for the development and restoration project as a whole. Mr. Quinn thanked the Board for their input, and informed them that their concerns would be addressed at the next meeting. There being no further business, Fred Johnson made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Debra Hilbert seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Respectfully submitted, Ellen S. Dubinsky M39WP • Salem Redevelopment 4-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744-4580 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD March 2, 1988 AGENDA 1. Roll Call Debra Hilbert Chris Greene Anne Farnam Frederick Johnson John Willand Timothy Clarke Dale Yale • 2. Discussion/New Business 1. Sign Review - 45-49 Federal Street 2. Sign Review - 197 Essex Street 3. Design Review - T.R. Kerr Building 4. Design Amendment - Essex Court Condominiums E2WP • • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Minutes March 2, 1988 The Design Review Board met at 8:30 a.m. on March 2, 1988, in the conference room at One Salem Green. Those in attendance were: Anne Farnam, Debra Hilbert, John Willand, Fred Johnson, and Tim Clarke. 45-49 Federal Street Attorney John Whipple presented a sign application for two signs. One sign is a hanging sign that will replace the present illuminated sign on the building at 49 Federal Street. The sign is three feet long and two feet wide. It will be a solid wood sign with a white background, black lettering and gold leaf. The second sign will be a flat sign which will be flush against the building at 45 Federal Street. The signs dimensions are 15" x 30" and will be placed between the window and the corner of the building. The sign will have a grey background with dark blue lettering. The Board suggested that photographs be taken of the building to better illustrate the exact placement of the signs. Debra Hilbert made a motion to approve the signs as presented pending the receipt of a photograph showing their exact location. Anne Farnam seconded the motion. All were in favor, motion so carried. Essex Court Condominiums Mr. Richard Ness appeared before the Board to receive an approval for minor design changes at the Essex Court Condominium Project. The first revision is the addition of two tenant entry doors with sidelights on the Essex St. facade. There is also a change on the courtyard facade to replace the sliding glass doors with patio doors. Debra Hilbert asked how the muntins would be applied to the doors. Mr. Ness responded that the muntins are factory applied plastic muntins on both sides of the door. Anne Farnam was concerned that these doors are domestic looking, and that they seemed inappropriate in the commercial section of the development. She asked to see a drawing of another type of door, preferably one without muntins. John Willand voiced his concern about the transition and connection of the placement and installation of the doors, and he requested more detailed drawings. Anne Farnam also suggested that the replacement doors on the courtyard facade be moved to the either side with sidelights as proposed for Essex St. The Board approved the changes in concept and requested that a plan showing the requested details be submitted. The Board scheduled a site visit for March 16, 1988, at 8:30 a.m. to see the progress being made on the Essex Court Condominium project. D 3 2 , 19 $8 T.R. Kerr Building Don Burnham and John Savasta appeared before the Board with design changes to the T.R Kerr and Foodland Buildings. The original plans called for the addition of two stories to the T.R. Kerr Building and the demolition of the facade of the Foodland Building. Because of the need for residential parking, the plans have been redesigned and the demolition of the entire Foodland Building is now proposed. The T.R. Kerr Building which will be called the Endicott Center will consist totally of commercial space. The Foodland Building which will be known as Conant Court will house 69 residential units with retail use on the ground floor, 55 underground parking spaces and 14 surface parking spaces. The new infill building will have an L shape and a courtyard effect will result. There is a public walkway proposed in order to promote pedestrian traffic from the Sewall Street parking lot to Washington St. The building will be 81 feet in height and have balconies on the courtyard side of the building. The top floor of the building will have a 12 foot setback. In addition, the new building will have two setbacks in the facade, each setback being 2 feet. The design of the Kerr Building has not changed. After some discussion, the Board listed some of their concerns regarding the new design. They are as follows: 1. The 4 foot setback of the building. 2. The materials used on the facade. 3. The details of the windows. • 4. The lack of detail on the first and second floors of the Conant Court Building. 5. The design of the mansard roof connection to Conant Court. 6. The design of the upper floor elevation of Conant Court and the variety of facade materials. The Board felt that the upper story looked "tacked on" to the building. 7. The Board felt that the front entry way should be better articulated. 8. The Board would like to see more detail of the facade underneath the proposed awning. 9. A better definition of the doors into the specific retail spaces. The Board requested that the outlined items be addressed, and a meeting be scheduled to review such concerns in the near future. Khouri Rug The Board reviewed an application for Khouri Rugs located at 197 Essex Street. The sign has previously been approved, and the owners would like to move it to their new location. The Board approved the sign, but requested a photograph be taken of the building to show exactly where the sign will be placed. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. The next meeting will be held March 16, 1988. Respectfully submitted, • Bill Luster M33WP . DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Minutes October 28, 1987 The Design Review Board met at 8:30 a.m. on October 28, 1987, in the conference room at One Salem Green. Those in attendance were: Chris Greene, Debra Hilbert, and Dale Yale. Video Paradise Mr. Bernard Spielman appeared before the Board with an application to install two red neon signs at 207 Washington Street. One sign would read VIDEO and the other PARADISE. They will be 14" in height and be centered in the window. Mr. Luster explained that the Board granted a temporary sign permit to Video Paradise for the sign presently located above the storefront. Ms. Hilbert commented that there are several posters in the window of the storefront and some of the things should be removed to reduce its present cluttered look. She also recommended that the letters be constantly lit. Mr. Greene felt that the letters should only be 12" in height instead of 14". Mr. Spielman concurred with these conditions and also informed the Board that the • temporary sign will be taken down. Chris Greene made a motion to approve the sign permit with the conditions that the letters be 12" in height, the sign be constantly lit, and that some of the posters in the window be taken down to reduce clutter. Debra Hilbert seconded the motion all were in favor, motion so carried. r e General Office Equipment Mr. Bernard Kelly and Mr. Don Morse appeared before the Board with an application for a hanging sign, a window sign, and an awning at 244 Essex Street. The hanging sign will be 3' x 4' with a dark brown background and gold leaf lettering with the wording and sizing as submitted. It will hang from a steel bracket on the right corner. The lettering in the window will be vinyl letters, either black or white in color. The awning will be a fold-up awning with brown fancy style Sunbrella #4749 material as previously approved. Mr. Luster reminded Mr. Morse that the lettering can only occupy 20% of the total window space. Ms. Hilbert requested that Mr. Morse sketch the design of the window bracket. Mr. Green commented that the word "Typewriters" is too big on the hanging sign and that the lettering be sized down 1" to be 3Y:" in height. He also recommended that the letters in the window be no more than 2" high. • Chris Greene made a motion to approve the sign application with the condition that the letters in the word "typewriter" on the hanging sign be 3'/:" in height; the vinyl letters for the window sign be no more than 2" in height,and can be either white or black in color; and the awning be approved as submitted. Debra Hilbert seconded the motion. All were in favor, motion so carried. Delande Lighting Mr. Arthur Delande appeared before the Board with an application for two signs. Both are aluminum with a white background and black lettering and their logo which has a blue circle around it. One sign will be centered over the front entrance in a recessed brick panel. Its dimensions are 1016" x 27". The second sign will designed like the first with its dimensions being 9' x 2' and will be centered above the rear entrance to the building. Chris Greene suggested that the front entrance sign be made smaller so that there is a border present instead of it filling up the entire panel. Dale Yale made a motion to accept the two signs with the condition that the front entrance sign be made smaller so that a 1"-2" border is revealed all around the sign. Chris Greene seconded the motion. All were in favor, motion so carried. There being no further business the meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submitted, • Bill Luster M32WP • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Minutes August 26, 1987 The Design Review Board met at 8:30 a.m. on August 26, 1987, in the conference room at One Salem Green. Those in attendance were: Debra Hilbert, Anne Farnam, Dale Yale, Tim Clarke, Chris Greene, and Fred Johnson. Olde Discount Stockbrokers - Dodge Court & Washington Street Mr. Arthur Porterlance from Leslie Sign Center presented an application for two internally lit signs for Olde Discount Stockbrokers located on the corner of Dodge and Washington Streets. The signs will be made of aluminum and lexan with a border that can either be white or bronze. The colors of the sign will be white, black, blue, and red to match the company's logo. Each sign is 2 feet by 12 feet. Mr. Luster reminded Mr. Porterlance that this sign has to be approved by the owner of building before being erected. After some discussion, Debra Hilbert made a motion to approve the signs as PP g presented with a bronze border and that the sign be centered on the brick banding on the Dodge Court side and be centered on the sign bay above the entrance on the Washington Street side. Anne Farnam seconded the motion, all were in favor, • motion so carried. Essex Court Condominiums Mr. Luster informed the Board that the SRA has approved this project conditional upon the DRB's approval of all design details. Richard Ness explained to'the Board that cost of the construction of the drawings submitted to the Welch Company is too high and therefore he would like the Board to review a list of potential cuts which would result in cost savings for the project. 1. The wall of the CVS store.is,all brick, he-would like to use a pattern of stucco with brick piers. He explained that stucco can be painted so that the graffiti problem can be better addressed, and if stucco is used, the walkway will gain another lft. to IYzft. of space. He also would like to change the vestibule area near the gate on Essex to stucco. 2. The courtyard materials used on the paths are now concrete, and he would like to change them to pea stone on top of stone dust with steel edging. He also wants to remove the benches in the plan. This will have to go through the Site Plan Review process again. Chris Greene requested'detail of the construction specifically the measurements of the depths of the material. He went on to state that just stone dust should be used, and if it was constructed properly a hard slate like surface would result. He felt that the project would be more marketable with the benches, but that it does not alter the design. • 3. Mr. Ness informed the Board that the proposed retaining wall between the SRA owned parking area and the Essex Court public walkway is not needed. He explained to the Board that there is a 116" change in elevation to the SRA property line and that if the retaining wall can be eliminated they will slope the plant bed, install a pre-cast curb, catch basins, and also heavily landscape the area to better retain some of the water. • 4. Mr. Ness asked to take out the brick accents on the sidewalks. 5. Mr. Ness asked the Board if he could remove the precast bandings on the courtyard elevation. If it is taken out, '/z" brick corbelling could be used in its place. A cost determination has not been made as of yet, and there still is a chance that the precast bandings will remain. 6. The next issue is a change in the roof joist materials from steel to fire treated timber. The Building Inspector has already approved this change. 7. Mr. Ness requested that the brick on the vestibules and walls on the townhouses be painted plywood. There will be a clause in the condo documents that these cannot be painted any other color. 8. Mr. Ness requested that fypon moldings be used on the roof facing the SRA parking lot. 9. Mr. Ness requested that the closure panel from the Garage to Church St. be constructed with a material other than brick. The opening is approximately 5ft. wide. Chris Greene suggested that the panel be recessed 6" and brick should be continued to the panel with a neutral dark color metal set back 12". 10. Richard Ness also asked that the wood trim detail be deleted at the entry way, since the lobby will be solely residential and that there be no coffers. • Il. Mr. Ness also requested that the coffers be removed on Essex St. After lengthy discussion the consensus of the Board was to approve the elimination of the retaining wall, allow the brick corbelling instead of pre-cast banding on the courtyard facade, allow the stonedust replacement on the paths within the courtyard, with the condition of a detail drawing being approved by the Planning Department, and that the work be done with the highest quality to obtain the best results. They also approved the inclusion of a dark metal panel being utilized for the connection to the Parking Garage with the condition that such panel be setback 1 foot, the lobby ceiling change was approved, and the elimination of brick and replacement with wood on the balconies as long as the paint is the same color as is being used on other parts of the project and that the condo documents state that it cannot be painted any other color was approved. The Board concurred with the change of the roof joists being constructed with fire treated wood with the concurrence of the Building Inspector. The Board reserves the right to approve the detail of the trim changes and required that all changes be drawn in detail for the Board to review. Further discussion pursued regarding the CVS wall change. Time Clarke suggested that some type of lattice work be placed over the stucco for ivy to grow up. The Board agreed, and asked for details of this change. Anne Farnam felt that the brick vestibule and sidewalk accents should remain brick. The Board agreed, and further stipulated that the same type of brick that is used on City sidewalks be used. Mr. Ness drew the Board's attention to a discrepancy in the plans. He stated that the cobblestones have been replaced b b' p y numinous materials and that a steel picket fence has been designed for the Church Street accessway. The Board concurred with these changes. The Board asked Mr. Ness what the project's timetable was. Mr. Ness responded approximately fourteen months. There being no further business, Chris Greene made a motion to adjourn the meeting. The motion was seconded by Tim Clarke, all were in favor, motion so carried. Respectfully submitted, Bill Luster M31WP • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Minutes • July 1, 1987 The Design Review Board met at 8:30 a.m. on July 1, 1987, in the conference room at One Salem Green. Those in attendance were: John Willand, Debra Hilbert, and Tim Clarke: 24 Front Street - Federal Realty Mr. Raymond Young appeared before the Board with two signs previously used at another location. The signs were wooden with a blue background and gold carved lettering. The smaller of the two signs will be hung from a bracket on the Front Street facade of the building. The larger sign will be used at the rear of the building. The Board did not oppose the aesthetics of the sign but wanted to visit the site to make sure the signs would not look out of place on the building. 60 Washington Street - Boyles Restaurant Messrs. Ed Hogan and Don Boyle presented an application for a sign located at 60 Washington Street at the Odell Block. The sign will have a black background and carved gold leaf lettering. Mr. Boyle explained that the sign would match the colors of the existing Atlantic Computer sign and the letter style would be similar. • Debra Hilbert made a motion to approve the sign as presented. Mr. Clarke seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Essex Street Condominiums Richard Ness and Denise Garcia informed the Board that brick and window samples are available at the site for the Board to look at. Mr. Ness also explained that the CVS building wall treatment had been previously approved to be done in brick, however, he would like to change to stucco for reasons relative to cost. In addition, the brick veneer takes up too much space from.-the walkway. Mr. Luster suggested-that the-existing brick be repaired. Mr. Ness explained that the CVS owners want a better seal on the building and since the existing brick is so old and dryed out, they do not want the existing brick exposed. Mr. Ness also informed•tfie Board that at the end of the walkway on Essex Street there is a tree and a streetlight. lie would like permission to relocate these articles. He assured the Board that he will place them wherever the Board requests. Ms. Hilbert asked if he would repair the mall when he is done. Mr. Ness stated that he would. • Mr. Ness also asked the Board if they would allow him the option of eliminating the pre-cast concrete banding in the courtyard and replacing it with a soldier course or • Y2" corbelled brick. Mr. Willand stated that the pre-cast treatment is better, but what is being proposed is not a major change. He suggested that some type of contrasting or special molded brick be used for relief. Mr. Ness informed the Board that the change might not occur, but he has been informed that installing the concrete will slow down the pace of the project because of the labor intensity of changing the materials. Ms. Hilbert asked if the proposed windows had glued on muntin bars. Mr. Ness replied that the muntin bars were permanently fastened on the exterior of the aluminum windows, and a window sample was located on site. SITE VISITS 24 Front Street The Board first visited the 24 Front Street site. The Board agreed that the front sign should fit in between the existing brackets and the rear sign should be centered over the door. Ms. Hilbert made a motion to approve the existing signs with the locations specified. Mr. Clarke seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. • One Derby Square The Board also stopped at One Derby Square and felt that the transoms were to small another semi-circular transom should be added. They also felt that the dividing wall should not be seen which is the present case. Essex Court Condominiums The Board looked at downtown buidlings such as Old Town Hall and the Central Plaza Condominiums which used soldier courses as relief. After surveying several such buildings, they requested that the developer replace the concrete banding on the courtyard facade with Y2" corbelled brick rather than a soldier course of brick. The Board viewed the three brick samples and the aluminum window sample at the Essex Court Condominium site. After some discussion, the Board felt that since this will be the largest building in the area it is probably better for the brick to be lighter but the color should be compared to some of the other buildings along Essex Street. Ater surveying several downtown buildings, the Board approved the use of the Sipple Red Sand Finish Brick. A sample of which is on file at the Redevelopment Authority. Also approved was the elimination of the concrete banding on the courtyard facade which will be replaced with a belt course of brick which will be corbelled Y2 inch. In addition, the windows were approved with the request that the • thin black weather strip be white to conform with the rest of the window. The Board requested an elevation of the CVS wall for future deliberation. • There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. Respect-fully submitted, William Luster M26 WP • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Minutes June 3, 1987 The Design Review Board met at 8:30 a.m. on June 3, 1987, in the conference room at One Salem Green. Those in attendance were: Tim Clarke, Debra Hilbert, John Willand, and Dale Yale. The first item on the agenda was a sign permit for Allan Insurance Agency located at 265 Essex Street. Mr. Allan Cameras represented the insurance agency and presented the sign to the Board. The design was for gold colored letters to be attached to the inside of the bottom quarter of the front window. Ms. Hilbert aksed why the design was not centered between the window. She felt it would look better, but did not object to what was presented. Mr. Cameras responded that he had no objection to centering the lettering, but the owners of the building requested the sign be located on the bottom quarter of the window. Ms. Hilbert made a motion to approve the sign as presented, or with the option of centering the lettering. Dale Yale seconded the motion. All were in favor, motion so carried. Mr. Luster informed Mr. Cameras that following the SRA approval of the DRB's • recommendations, the sign can be erected. The second agenda item was the review of a sign permit for Winer Bros. Hardware. At this time Mr. Luster informed the Board that the issue of non compliance with a previous DRB recommendation regarding the placement of muntin bars on the storefront windows has been corrected. Mr. Dana Karis, of Winer Bros. Hardware, explained that the reason the windows were installed without the approved muntin bars was that the muntins were custom made and being shipped from California. He commented to the Board that he felt that the muntins add a great deal of integrity to the building. Mr. Jospeh Porterlance of Porterlance Sign Co. showed the Board a design for four signs, one for Banville Optical and three for Winer Hardware, two which will be erected on the Lafayette Street side of the building, and one that will be placed on the Dodge St. side. They will be installed on the brick facade. The signs are wooden with raised gold leaf letters on a black smaltz background. They actually are very similar to the signs that existed on the building in the 1900's. Mr. Willand questioned why all the signs were not of the same dimensions, but did not have any objections to the design as presented. Ms. Hilbert made a motion to approve the sign as presented. Mr. Clarke seconded the motion. All were in favor, motion so carried. Mr. Luster informed Mr. Karis that following the SRA approval of the DRB's recommendations, the sign can be erected. There being no further business the meeting was adjourned. M25WP • • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD • Minutes April 15, 1987 The Design Review Board met at 8:30 a.m. on April 15, 1987, in the conference room at One Salem Green. Those in attendance were: Debra Hilbert, Dale Yale, John Willand, Chris Greene, and Tim Clarke. The first order of business was to approve the minutes of the April 1, 1987, meeting. Chris Greene made a motion to approve the minutes. Dale Yale seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. First Universalist Church A sign application was presented to the Board for a sign at the First Universalist Church. A drawing was submitted to the Board. The dimensions of the sign are 10 feet long and 18 inches high. It will be a wood framed sign with an aluminum face. The frame and the lettering are black and the background is white. Debra Hilbert made a motion to approve the sign as submitted. Tim Clarke seconded the motion. Ms. Hilbert, and Messrs. Willand, Greene and Clarke voted in favor. Ms. Yale voted present. Motion so carried. 'r Essex Court Condominiums Mr. Luster informed the Board that Mr. Willand, himself, Richard Ness, and Denise • Garcia met on April 8th. to discuss several details concerning the project such as dormer moulding detail, detail of railing on the decks, protruding 1" granite detail above the commercial space, roof over the bay windows, consistency of doorway arches, and wooden doors on the Essex St. commercial portion of the project. Mr. John Serafini, attorney for the developer, explained to the the Board the project's history and the need for urgency of the approval of the design. Mr. Ness explained that the a brick and window sample will be brought to the site for the Board to view. Richard Ness asked the Board if they would approve the removal of the granite on all facades except for the Church Street facade and to keep the detailing of the granite on Church Street but use precast in its place. Chris Greene stated that he would agree to such a change. Denise Garcia asked if the windows could have applied muntins or muntins that are in between the glass. Chris Greene felt that the windows would "make or break" this structure and felt strongly that the windows should cast shadows especially on the Essex Street facade. Debra Hilbert, Dale Yale, and Tim Clarke also concurred with Mr. Greene's comment. • Page 2 i After some discussion, Debra Hilbert made a motion to approve the set of plans entitled "Essex Court Condominiums, April 15, 1987' with the amendments discussed at prior Board meetings and conditional upon the future approval of the brick, windows and a decision regarding substitution of granite with precast. Chris Greene seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submitted, William Luster M27WP • • �� s�=,-�3� �Y s.��- Salem Redevelopment pment TELEPHONE 744-6900 ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 744-4580 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD April 1, 1987 r g AGENDA 1. Roll Call Debra Hilbert Chris Greene Anne Farnham Frederick Johnson .John Willand Timothy Clarke Dale Yale 2. Approve minutes of DRB meetings held on January 7, 1987. ri 3. Items I. Almy's Development - Real Estate Development Group 2. Tompkins Furniture - Preliminary Discussion E2WP DESIGN REVIEW BOARD • Minutes April 1, 1987 The Design Review Board met at 8:30 a.m. on April 1, 1987, in the conference room at One Salem Green. Those in attendance were: Debra Hilbert, Chris Greene, John Willand, and Dale Yale. The first order of business was to approve the minutes of the January 7, 1987, meeting. Chris Greene made a motion to approve the minutes. Dale Yale seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. John Willand alerted the Board to the fact that Winer Brothers does not seem to be in compliance with the conditions that were approved by this Board, and that necessary action should be taken to correct the situation. 2 Front Street Debbie Spillane, Building Manager for One Salem Green, explained to the Board that two years ago Copley Investments purchased a parcel of land on the corner of Front and Central Streets from the SRA. The parcel is already paid for, but ownership has never been transferred because of several conditions placed upon the sale by the DRB. The only condition that has not been met is the addition of a granite curb to the site. Ms. Spillane stated that over the past eight months the property has been maintained and the loose pea stone has been swept so that it • does not infringe upon the street. She felt that with the proper maintenance a curb was not necessary. Mr. Luster informed the Board that although the maintenance of the property has been improved, he felt the curb is still necessary. The Board agreed that a 6" curb with gravel 2" from the top was necessary. They requested that Ms. Spillane prepare a design plan for the curbing and present it to the Board for their comments. Tompkins Furniture Steve Tompkins and Al Ayers appeared before the Board to present a proposal to repair the west wall of the Tompkins Furniture building. The wall is leaking and causing a great deal of damage to the newly renovated interior of the furniture store. Mr. Tompkins informed the Board that the wall is a common wall; he owns the top portion and Frank Delulis own the lower portion. Mr. Ayers, Mr. Tompkin's contractor, explained that to arrest the immediate problem of water leakage, he would like to apply a horizontal aluminum finished facade and have Mr. DeIulis finish his portion as he sees fit. He felt this would not bring prominence to the wall since it is not the front of the building. He added that to use brick would be cost prohibitive. John Willand stated that this wall is a very prominent feature in the area and felt the proposed plan was unacceptable. • Debbie Hilbert felt that one facade treatment should be used throughout. r• Chris Greene also felt that the facade was a very prominent feature on Essex Street, and he felt that what would be most appropriate would be a something that is featureless and doesn't call attention to itself with a smooth neutral coloring. He also suggested that the material be stucco or stucco like because the Board would have diffuculty approving metal siding. Bill Luster interjected that the SRA has a low interest loan program with one of the criterion being renovations that are cost prohibitive. Debbie Hilbert suggested that since Mr. DeIulis is an expert in this kind of work that the two owners should appear before the Board together with a solution. Dale Yale agreed that she would like to see a uniform treatment of the whole building and that it be approved as such. Essex Court Condominiums Richard Ness and Denise Garcia appeared before the Board with their most recent designs for the project. Ms. Garcia explained that the access way has been moved in the mall which resulted in the addition of another door. She pointed out the railing configurations on the semi-porches and explained that the railing would project eight inches, therefore, you could not step out onto the porch. The railings will be horizontal pickets. They will be aluminum with a baked enamel fi#hish. • Ms. Garcia went on to present the west courtyard elevation. She explained that five foot brick piers will project 4yz feet to hold cedar clapboard balconies. There will be two stairs out of each unit to be used for courtyard egress. The east courtyard design calls for a fypon and wood treatment with skylights on the upper PPer units. The north courtyard elevation will be the site of the pool and exercise area. The pool will be underneath the building and the balconies will be recessed. The parking link will take place on the sixth floor of this elevation. The building exterior will be brick clad. The south elevation will consist of storefront windows. A courtyard plant list was submitted. The formal garden will be lighted with lanterns to mark the walkways. Two parking schemes were submitted to the Board for the treatment of the City- owned lot. Scheme A consisted of 28 parking spaces and Scheme B consisted of 41 parking spaces. The Board preferred Scheme A. Chris Greene suggested that more trees be placed near the public walkway. John Willand suggested that the rythm of the plantings is fragmented and should occur with a more regular rythm. John Willand expressed his concern over the lack of details on the dormers. He suggested some sort of trim or perhaps continuing the brick detail around or use some type of molded brick. He also felt that the precast should be continued over the other two windows. Ms. Garcia explained that molded brick is an expensive treatment and suggested that lintels be placed over the windows. 0 John Willand also expressed his concern over the transition of granite to brick, what the storefront doors would look like, and how the balconies would be constructed. After some discussion, it was decided that an interim meeting between Ms. Garcia and Messrs. Willand, Luster, and Ness be set up for April 8th to go over the details of the project and report back to the Board on April 15th. The next topic of discussion was the public walkway. Mr. Ness proposed that the CVS wall will retain a new brick and stucco face. The lighting placed on the wall will be a reflection of the lighting on the townhouses and perhaps some pseudo windows will be used to break up the facade. The Board requested design plans illustrating this elevation. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. The next meeting is scheduled for April 15, 1987. Respectfully submitted, William Luster M27 WP • • IA rm Salem ME Redevelopment 44-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744.4580 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD January 7, 1987 AGENDA L Roll Call Andrea Fish Debra Hilbert Chris Greene Anne Farnam Frederick Johnson John Willand Timothy Clarke 2. Approve minutes of DRB meeting held on December 3, 1986. 3. Items 1. Derby Square - Window Restoration 2. Almy's Development 3. SHA Elderly Housing • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Minutes January 7, 1.987 The Design Review Board met at 8:30 a.m. on January 7 , 1987 , in the conference room at One Salem Green. Those in attendance were: Tim Clarke, Chris Greene, John Willand, Andrea Fish, Fred Johnson, and Dale Yale. The first order of business was to approve the minutes of the December 3, 1987, meeting. After some discussion, Andrea Fish made a motion to approve the minutes. John Willand seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Salem Housing Authority Joe Carrot of the Architects Collaborative, Elayne Hart of the Salem Housing Authority, and Paul McFarland of the Executive Office of Communities and Development, appeared before the Board to resolve three issues that were discussed at the previous meeting regarding the elderly housing complex at 205 Bridge Street. They were as follows: 1 . Site work landscaping along Bridge Street 2. Entry Design 3 . Exterior Design Joe Carrot explained that in the original plans the parking lot was scheduled to be screened from Bridge Street as a result of the building set-back. The fencing, site landscaping, grass, and curbcuts were to be done by the SHA. The public improvements including trees, sidewalk repairs and lighting on Ash Street were to be done by the SRA to connect this area with the public walkway system. However, since the original wooden building has been changed to brick, there have been problems regarding the budget for site landscaping. Andrea Fish asked why the trees have been allocated for the rear of the building and not the front. Mr. McFarland replied that since the building is south facing, the trees must be placed in the rear to keep the units from overheating and also to screen the view of the New England Telephone Building. At this point, Mr. Carrel reviewed the elevation drawings with the Board. The building will be brick with limestone lintels and silts and Anderson vinyl clad 6/1 windows and simulated wood roof shingles. The handicapped units will. be on the second and third floors. The entrance to the building is positioned on the east end of the front elevation. The possibility of a center entrance was studied, but considered unfeasible because it would result in a loss of units and also increase the building size and cost. E Page 2 • The east—side entry is easier to access and also provides a strong link with Morency Manor. John Willand commented that the building needed an anchor in order not to be treated as wing to Morency Manor. He suggested that if such an anchor could not be effective, the Board take the opposite approach and take steps to downplay the entry way. Chris Greene suggested that the entrance be moved to the terrace side. He felt this would create a major focal point on the entire site and also leave the symetrical front facade uninterrupted. Tim Clarke felt that the entrance would be more visible in front. Andrea Fish favored the change. Joe Carrol agreed with the change of the location of the doorway, as did Mr. McFarland of EOCD. Chris Greene also stated that the parking lot could be moved because there will be more space created by removing the front ramps. John Will.and asked if attic vents were needed, if so, suggested they be limestone. Mr. Carrol replied that attic vents will be needed and they would consider using limestone. Andrea Fish made a motion to approve the plan with the entranceway change, site plan change and the plantings in the front of the building. Fred Johnson seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. \ At this point Bill Luster suggested that Mr. Carrel provide the Board with an updated new site and landscape plan, and new entrance plan that incorporated the changes discussed at the meeting. A1my' s Developemnt Richard Ness and Denise Garcia appeared before the Board to address the concerns discussed at the previous meeting regarding the Essex Court Condominiums. The first item was a change making all the dormers the same size and showing more detail on the palladian windows. The Larger dormer will be used throughout the top floor and the windows will be a half circle on ' top of a set of french doors. Chris Greene suggested that the windows be centered underneath the dormers, or that the dormers be moved to be centered with the windows. 41 Mr. Ness concurred with such a change. Richard Ness noted the change of the townhouse entrances. They are no longer greek porticos. They will be 26" deep, 8 ' wide, and the doors will be off center to coordinate with the interior design. -. Fred Johnson asked for more detail regarding the walkway. �i Page 3 • Richard Ness explained that the walkway would be deeded to the City , and the condominium association would maintain it. Negotiations are currently taking place to work out reasonable operating hours for the walkway so that it does not become a Loitering spot . The gates proposed to lock the walkway would be wrought iron to match the balconies. Another concern that has been addressed is continuing the archway and setting the glass vestibule back on the Essex Street facade. Richard Ness. explained that precast concrete would be used as banding on the upper floors, and granite would be used on the storefront 1•evel. Precast. lintels and sills will be used and colors will. be determined by the Board at a later date. At this time the Board reviewed the landscaping plans for Church Street. Andrea Fish asked if the existing trees and wall will remain. Fred Johnson requested that the trees stay to keep the rhythm of the street. Richard Ness replied that the wall will be torn down, but that the landscaping in the area would remain substantial. Andrea Fish felt that there should be a condition to close in the parking lot, since the loading entrance and all the parked cars could have a negative impact on the streetscape. Tim Clarke asked what type of facilities would be provided for resident trash removal. Richard Ness replied that there will be two trash compactor rooms for the residents which would be emptied on a weekly basis. 4 Fred Johnson asked to see plans for the parking connection on the 4th floor and plans for the in—fill of the building. John Willand asked about the chimneys, and if it was a tenant option for fireplaces. He felt that it should be all or nothing and the chimneys should all be the same kind. He went on to express his concern that all detail elements should be consistent to help alleviate the massing. Mr. Ness made note of the additional information which the board members requested, and indicated that he would provide such information at the next scheduled DRB meeting. Page 4 • There being no further business, Ms. HibE made a motion to adjourn. Ms. Fish seconded the motion, and all were in favor. Respectfully submitted, Bill Luster E652 rA � Salem Redevelopment 44-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 7444580 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD December 3, 1986 AGENDA 1. Roll Call Andrea Fish Debra Hilbert Chris Greene Anne Farnham Frederick Johnson John Willand Timothy Clarke 2. Approve minutes of DRB meeting held on November 12, 1986. 3. Items 1. Almy's Development - Real Estate Development Group 2. SHA Elderly Housing - 205 Bridge Street 3. Derby Square Book Store - 215 Essex Street E2WP • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD • Minutes December 3, 1986 The Design Review Board met at 8:30 a.m. on December 3, 1986, in the conference room at One Salem Green. Those in attendance were: Fred Johnson, Tim Clarke, John Willand, Ann Farnam, and Debra Hilbert . The first order of business was to discuss the minutes of the November 12, 1986, meeting. Debra Hilbert made a motion to approve the minutes with the following amendments: wood frames be substituted for metal frame windows on the second floor and that a sentence be added emphasizing that the transoms be permanent and mechanically fastened and that they replicate exactly the pattern that is there now. Ann Farnam seconded the motion with the above amendments. All were in favor, motion so carried. One Derby Square Mr. Jack Donovan appeared before the Board with plans to change the doorway to his office space and the service entrance to Kennedy' s Butter and Egg Store. He explained that the glass doors that are existing provide minimal security and are in need of repair. He would like to replace the existing doors with two raised panel steel doors so Kennedy' s can have their own delivery entrance and so that the office space can be separate from Kennedy's. The door will be painted to match existing building colors. The space above the door will be glass with a wooden spoke design as shown on the plan that was submitted to the Board. Mr. Donovan explained that he had considered wooden doors, but because of the wear and tear on the delivery entrance and security reasons he felt that steel doors would be more appropriate. Debra Hilbert expressed her preference for wooden doors. She also requested that the handles be placed in the middle so that the doors look like a set of double doors. Fred Johnson asked if the divider wall would be seen through the transom. He felt that the light would shine unevenly through if only one side left a hall light on. Tim Clarke suggested that a transparent ceiling be placed over the partition so that it could diffuse the light. John Will.and stated that if wear and tear were a major consideration that brass kickplates be used to protect the wooden door. Fred Johnson felt that the door should be wood and the panels be consistent with the other doors on the building. Mr. Donovan felt that wooden doors would be prohibitively expensive costing approximately $600 more per door than a steel door. • Page 2 • Tim Clarke stated that there would be a significant difference between wood and steel, but he did not believe it was that prohibitive. He also informed the Board that a steel door would dent but the paint would not chip. Debra Hilbert made a motion to approve the door design as submitted with the following conditions: 1) The door be wooden and hinged on the outside. 2) If the owner provides specifications for a metal frame door that is acceptable to the Board that change will be made. 3) The transom be designed to read as one. 4) The spokes on the transom be wooden, applied, and be of significant weight. 5) The door frame be wooden. John Willand seconded the motion. All were in favor, motion so carried. Andrea Fish joined the meeting at this time. Salem Housing Authority Joe Carrot and Susan Scheld presented site and design changes to the Board for the elderly housing project at 205 Bridge Street. Mr. Luster informed the Board that a previous site plan had been approved, but the site plan has since changed. Mr. Carrot informed the Board EOCD felt the building was to large, so it • has been scaled down 15%. The parking configuration has stayed the same. There are seven parking spaces in front of the building. Two of the corner spaces have been removed, leaving the development with 2 less . parking spaces than the Zoning Ordinance allows. Mr. Carrot questioned who would provide the eleven Linden trees. He also questioned whether the DPW had plans to rectify the flooding situation on Bridge Street. Mr. Luster explained to the Board that the originalpurchase price of $55,000 has been decreased by $30,000 as a compromise in exchange for brick siding. The money will be used for public improvements around the site, but exactly what kind of improvements will be made have not been finalized. Mr. Carrot went on to explain that there will be 35 units of elderly housing within the three story structure. The first floor will house 11 units and community space. The windows will. be 9/1 and the materials will be brick precast sills and lintels and every 6th course there will. be a soldier course of brick. Andrea Fish asked if the trees intherear of the building could be placed in the front. Mr. Carrot replied that EOCD does not want the rear units to look out onto the New England Telephone parking lot. Fred Johnson suggested that perhaps the telephone company would be • willing to pay for the trees to shade the building. Page 3 � Fred Johnson asked why the entrance was placed where it is. Mr. Carrol explained that the porched entry has been positioned close to the Morency Manor, so common space could be shared more easily, also because of the grade of the land. John Willand expressed concern over the entrance not being in the center of the building. He felt the building lacked a focus and that it reads like a secondary building or an annex. Mr. Carrol agreed to explore different entranceway placements for the next meeting. The Board also suggested that a representative from EOCD be present at the next meeting to help expedite the approval process for this project. Almy' s Development Richard Ness and Denise Garcia appeared before the Board with an updated set of plans for the Almy' s condominium development. Mr. Ness informed the Board that the public accessway will be ten feet wide and there are negotiations taking place to redesign the SRA parking lot and to perhaps acquire some spaces for townhouse parking. The commercial. space has been expanded so that the public has visual access into the courtyard. There will be two ways to gain access into the courtyard area. John Willand asked if the DRB has jurisdiction over the courtyard. Bill Luster replied in the affirmative. Mr. Ness informed the Board that the Board of Appeal has granted variances for density and height. The building will. be 69 ft. height to the cornice line. There has been a change in the roof design. The top has been flattened, but the pitch is steeper. Ms. Garcia feels that the roof is designed so that no roof equipment will be seen. Not shown on the plan are wrought iron railings on every unit. Andrea Fish asked if the cornice line could be carried across the dormers. Richard Ness answered in the negative, pointing out that the small individual projections break up the massing. Denise Garcia called the Board' s attention to the window treatment changes on the 5th floor. The middle pane will be 1. I1. and not 911. Page 4 �f Andrea Fish made the Board aware of how the streetscape would change if the Almy' s building was setback. The focus will. be on the garage and not the church which is preve.l.ant now. Denise Garcia passed out some material information such as cornice detail and lighting fixtures for the Board to review. John Willand expressed his concern over the size of the dormers. He felt that they were too close together and that perhaps they should all be the same size. Andrea Fish asked why there was a formal driveway. Mr. Ness responded that congestion and people parking in a pull off parking scheme were two reasons why the proposed driveway system was chosen. John Willard asked Mr. Ness for more detailed figures on the height of the two buildings. Mr. Ness replied that the Essex Street building is 58 ft to the cornice and 69 ft. to the roof. The Church Street building is 69 ft. to the cornice and 78 ft . to the roof. Debra Hilbert asked about using granite on the facade. Mr. Ness explained that they would Like to use granite, but it is very expensive and that over 1,000 linear feet of granite would be needed. He addded that the construction documents would be ready on January 2nd and after price submittals from contractors this concern can be finalized. John Willand asked if the height of the retailestablishments were the same as the residential. and if the are of comparible to the surrounding store heights and suggested that it should be. Ms. Garcia replied that the floor to floor height of the retail portion is 12 ft . and the residential is 10 ft. She also thought that the surrounding stores were two story establishments. John Willard suggested that the smaller dormers either be pul.l.ed in or gotten rid of and that the cornice line be uninterrupted. Fred Johnson expressed his concern over how the new building will relate to the Mall. . He felt that the archway should be repeated so that people can make choices. Ms. Garcia informed the Board that she was working on a vestibule to connect the 4th floor to the garage. She thought that the building • might need to be in-filled. Page 5 Bill Luster listed the following as concerns to be discussed at the next meeting: 1 . Dormer design - palladium window design 2. Church St . landsaping - drive-thru & vista 3 . SRA parking lot plans 4. Retail building heights 5. Townhouse facade details 6. Plans for 4th floor connection and potential. in-fill of building 7. Use of granite 8. Continuing the arch and setting the glass vestibule back. There being no further business, Andrea Fish made a motion to adjourn. John Willand seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Respectfully submitted, Bill Luster E517 SalemME t Redevelopment 44-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744-4580 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD November 12, 1986 AGENDA 1. Roll Call Andrea Fish Debra Hilbert Chris Greene Anne Farnham Frederick Johnson John Willand Timothy Clarke 2. Approve minutes of DRB meetings held on October 17, 1986. 3. Items 1. 86 Lafayette Street - Winer Brothers Hardware 2. Almy's Development - Real Estate Development Group E2WP DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Minutes November 12, 1986 The Design Review Board met a 8:30 a.m. on November 12, 1986, in the conference room at One Salem Green. Those in attendance were: Andrea Fish, Debra Hilbert, Ann Farnham, John Willand. The first order of business was to discuss the minutes of the October 17, 1986, meeting. Debra Hilbert made a motion to approve the minutes as presented. Andrea Fish seconded the motion. All were in favor, motion so carried. Winer Hardware Mr. Dana Karas appeared before the Board with two design changes to his previously approved plan. The first being that instead of having three storefronts, there will be two. There will be one doorway eliminated which will be replaced with glass. The second change is that the existing transoms are beyond repair. Mr. Karas explained that the transoms have been painted several times, contan a fair amount of dry rot, and are missing several panes of glass. All new wood sashes would have to be installed which would require double aluminum mullions for support. A representative from North Shore Glass Company explained that they could install P thick insulated glass set in an anodized aluminum frame. The mullions can be made to match the existing wood thickness, can be mechanically fastened, and anodized to match. Debra Hilbert felt that the windows should be aluminum to match the second floor 8/1 aluminum windows with applied muntin bars. Ann Farnham agreed. John Willand commented that he felt wood frames would be acceptable on the lower level since it is a different use, but he also did not oppose the aluminum. Debra Hilbert informed the Mr. Karas that the new transoms should resemble and have the same weight as the existing ones had. Debra Hilbert made a motion to approve the two design changes of the front configuration of two storefronts, and the replacement of the existing transoms with new ones. Andrea Fish seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Almy's Development Denise Garcia and Richard Ness appeared before the Board with updated design plans for the Almy's building. Richard Ness informed the Board that they are still working on the dimensions for the public walkway. He informed the Board that there is a possibility of obtaining some space in the SRA parking lot. Andrea Fish asked if the roof line had changed since the last presentation. Mr. Ness replied that the roof line has been changed to accomodate more living space in the upper stories. Denise Garcia briefly described the current plans. The materials used on the Essex • Street elevation will be some type of precast stone. The main entrance to the building will be on Church Street. There will be other secondary entrances so that there is no conflict between the public and private uses of the development. A great deal of emphasis will be placed on the courtyard, the basement level will house the health club and pool. There will be retail space on the first floor of Essex Street. There will be office condominium space on the first floor of Church Street. Andrea Fish informed Mr. Ness that she would like to see granite used as a material on the Essex Street elevation and that she had a problem with the second entrance having the appearance of a service entrance. Ms. Garcia continued to explain that the Church Street side will be one story higher, and there will wrought iron balconies and french doors on the Essex Street facade and around the courtyard. They will be functional balconies so that residents can step out onto them. John Willand expressed concern regarding the palladium windows in the arches. He felt that the windows should fill out the entire arch area. Denise Garcia responded that the glazing can be taken to the top or the brick can be taken down to the window. John Willand expressed his concern with the residential entrance. He felt that it should be placed on the opposite side of the building closer to the garage. • Mr. Ness informed the Board that he is negotiating with the garage so that direct access can be obtained between the two structures. The Board felt that there should be two smaller chimney stacks on the roof instead of one large one. Andrea Fish felt that the building was too high and could be shortened within the number of stories. Ms. Garcia suggested.that she could bring down the roof and made the dormers protrude more. Debra Hilbert expressed her concern with seeing too many dormers. Bill Luster suggested for the next meeting that elevations of every side of the development be drawn out, window and door details be shown, a landscape plan be presented, the parking lot/walkway issue be addressed, the massing and height concerns be addressed, and that the use of granite be looked into. There being no further business, Debra Hilbert made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Andrea Fish seconded the motion, all were in favor motion so carried. Respectfully submitted, Bill Luster E2WP SalemRE ` Redevelopment 44-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744 -4580 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD October 17, 1986 AGENDA 1. Roll Call Andrea Fish Debra Hilbert Chris Greene Anne Farnham Michael Lally Frederick Johnson 2. Approve minutes of DRB meetings held on October 8, 1986. • 3. Items 1. 86 Lafayette Street - Winer Brothers Hardware • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Minutes October 17, 1986 The Design Review Board met at 8:30 a.m. on October 17, 1986, in the conference room at One Salem Green. Those in attendance were: Andrea Fish, Debra Hilbert, and Chris Greene. The first order of business was to discuss the minutes of the October 8, 1986, meeting. Debra Hilbert made a motion to approve the minutes as presented. Andrea Fish seconded the motion. All were in favor, motion so carried. Winer Hardware Mr. David Sandler and Mr. David Jaquith appeared before the Board with revised plans for the Winer Bros. Hardware building located at 86 Lafayette Street. Mr. Jaquith explained that the building will be divided into thirds with a center entry. The grill work will be similar to what currently exists overhead and the facade will consist of all glass with brick on the bottom. Debra Hilbert suggested that the brick be recessed, and asked why the brick has been substituted for the originally proposed wood material. Mr. Jaquith replied that the brick is a low maintenance material. Mr. Jaquith went on to explain that there will be new windows installed on the upper floors., The windows will have insulated glass and applied muntin bars as previously suggested. The large windows on the Dodge Street side will be bronze-tone aluminum. Andrea Fish asked the dimension of the mullions. She felt that they should have more weight or else the windows might read like one large panel of glass. Mr. Jaquith replied that presently the mullions are IY4", but he will make them larger at the corners and the two on the side of the building double in width. Chris Greene felt that the building would look better with more mullions. They could correspond to the lower glass panels to give the building more articulation. Debra Hilbert asked if the existing transoms will be restored. Mr. Sandler replied that the transoms need to be replaced. Chris Greene felt that the transoms were one of the only positive architectural elements of the building and should try to be maintained. Andrea Fish made a motion to approve the design as presented and changes as shown on plan dated October 17, 1986, including restoring the existing transoms. Resectfully submitted, Bill Luster E2WP A Salem Redevelopment 44-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744-4580 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD October 8, 1986 AGENDA 1. Roll Call Andrea Fish Debra Hilbert Chris Greene _ Anne Farnham Michael Lally Frederick Johnson 2. Approve minutes of DRB meetings held on September 24, 1986. • 3. Items 1. 86 Lafayette Street - Winer Brothers Hardware 2. Essex Street - General Office Equipment: Awning Permit • • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Minutes October 8, 1986 The Design Review Board met at 8:30 a.m. on October 8, 1986, in the conference room at One Salem Green. Those in attendance were: Andrea Fish, Debra Hilbert, and Fred Johnson. The first order of business was to discuss the minutes of the September 24, 1986. Fred Johnson made a motion to approve the minutes as presented. Andrea Fish seconded the motion. All were in favor, motion so carried. Winer Hardware Mr. Dana Karas, Mr. David Sandler, and a representative from Jaquith Architects presented plans for the expansion of Winer Hardware located at 86 Lafayette Street. They are proposing to make three storefronts out of the existing building. The structure will be maintained and the infill buildings will be repaired and the wood will be replaced on the storefronts. There will be three entry doors constructed for the retail stores and an egress door for the apartments above. Plans also include repointing and washing the entire building. Debra Hilbert asked what kind of windows would be installed for the storefronts and the apartments. . The architect responded that the second floor windows will be 1/1 and the storefront will be large glass panels. Debra Hilbert suggested that 8/1 muntin bars could be placed on the exterior of the windows. She also expressed her concern over the transom windows above the storefronts. She felt that they were important to the building and should try to be restored. Fred Johnson expressed his concern over the wood panels on the bottom of the storefronts. He felt that they should be carried all the way across the structure to set up a continuous rhythm. Andrea Fish asked the owners if they were taking down the awning and existing sign, and informed them that if a new awning was erected the Board would have to review it. They replied the awning and sign will be removed and replaced with a sign band containing raised letters mounted directly on the brick. Debra Hilbert expressed her concern with the new angled doors that will be constructed. She felt that people would not easily understand what door to enter for each business and that too much signage would be confusing. She asked if there was any way to straighten out the entrance doors. Andrea Fish asked what the reason for the decorative panels on the bottom of the . buildings. She suggested that the glass panels be brought all the way down. • Fred Johnson also suggested that the glass panels be brought all the way down and more detail be paid to the transom windows on the top. Debra Hilbert asked what materials would be used on the doors. The owners replied aluminum doors will be used. The Board began to look at design plans for the Dodge Street facade of the building. The owner explained that another door has been added to enter into the retail establishment on the corner of the street. There has also been another door added for a second egress to the apartment buildings and for the Winer Hardware receiving area. The Board was pleased with the treatment of the retail door but did not like the placement of the warehouse door. They suggested trying to incorporate it closer to the loading dock or incorporate it into one of the three existing arch windows that have been filled with brick. Bill Luster explained to the owners that the Board needs to see revised detail drawings which address the concerns which were raised. General Office Equipment Mr. Kelly appeared before the Board to replace an existing torn roll up awning on Essex Street and add a new permanent awning on Sewall Street. Mr. Kelly • explained that the front awning is greatly needed because of the sun. The side awning was suggested to complement the front awning but is only decorative. Mr. Kelly showed the Board a sample of the new green stripe awning. The Board advised Mr. Kelly not to erect the awning proposed for the Sewall Street side of the building, and he agreed. Fred Johnson made a motion to approve the green stripe roll up awning with a green flap on the Essex Street facade. Andrea Fish seconded the motion. All were in favor motion so carried. There being no further business, Fred Johnson made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Debra Hilbert seconded the motion. All were in favor motion so carried. Respectfully submitted, Bill Luster E2WP • Salem Redevelopment pment O TELEPHONE 744-4580 ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 744-4580 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD September 24, 1986 AGENDA 1. Roll Call Andrea Fish Debra Hilbert Chris Greene Anne Farnham Michael Lally Frederick Johnson 2. Approve minutes of DRB meetings held on August 20, 1986, and August 27, 1986. • 3. Items 1. Almy's Building - Real Estate Development Group 2. Newmark Building - Stephen Ingemi; Paul Fenton, and Neil Schauer • • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Minutes September 24, 1986 The Design Review Board met at 8:30 a.m. on September 24, 1986, in the conference room at One Salem Green. Those in attendance were: Ann Farnham, Chris Greene, and Fred Johnson. The first order of business was to discuss the minutes of the August 20, 1986 and August 27, 1986 meetings. Chris Greene made a motion to approve the minutes with the amendment that Mr. Casendino's name be spelled with one s. Fred Johnson seconded the motion. All were in favor, motion so carried. Almy's Development Mr. Richard Ness, a representative from the Real Estate Development Group, and Ms. Denise Garcia, a representative from the architectural firm of Vitols Associates, presented preliminary design plans for the Almy's Building. The plan includes provisions for 107-115 residential condominium units, a pedestrian link from Essex Street to Church Street, and a courtyard nine feet below street level in the center of the development. The developers plan to fulfill the parking requirements by leasing spaces in the East India Garage. There will be some commercial space set aside on the first floor of Essex Street, and office condominiums on the first floor of Church Street. Bill Luster explained to the Board that the developers need 165 on-site parking spaces, so a parking variance will be needed. He went on to explain that this project will be requiring variances and/or approvals of the Board of Appeal, Design Review Board, Salem Redevelopment Authority, Planning Board, Parking . Commission, and Historical Commission (demolition delay ordinance). The approval process is going to take at least six months. Ann Farnham asked if the developers are proposing direct access to the parking deck from the condominium complex. She also asked if the developers had alternative plans for parking if the Commission does not approve their request. Mr. Ness informed the Board that direct access could be obtained and that there are no alternative plans for on-site parking at this time. Ms. Garcia went on to explain that the garden level will be approximately ten feet below grade with townhouses surrounding the area with entrances that can be gained from the first level. The ammenities of the complex will include a swimming pool, club room, changing room, and individual unit storage. There is also unfinished basement space on Essex Street that could be used for commercial space. The first entry level on Church Street will serve as a 10-12 foot wide public way with paving and lighting, an access to six townhouses, access to the office space on Church Street, and a a secondary access to the the commercial use on Essex Street. Fred Johnson asked if the building on the Church Street side would be set back. Ms. Garcia replied that the building would be set back to allow better visibility for the public way. Chris Greene stressed the importance of the width of the public way and suggested that the building be set back even further. Mr. Luster informed the Board that some discussion had taken place regarding utilizing the SRA parking lot that abuts the Almy's property. Ms. Garcia showed the Board plans for the inside courtyard, informing the Board that the private courtyard is a very positive selling point in marketing the units. Chris Greene informed Ms. Garcia that he had seen a very attractive and effective mirror technique used in a courtyard in Amsterdam, NY in an effort to make the space appear larger. Ms. Garcia went on to inform the the Board that the second and third floors will be one and two bedroom flats and the floors will adjoin from building to building. The fourth floor is where the building begins to break and the roof steps down to alleviate massing. The materials to be used on the complex will be a combination of brick and clapboards. There will also be balconies on the townhouses and on the courtyard side of the flats. • Chris Greene commented on the importance of the height of the cornice and how setting back the upper two stories was an effective design technique to make the building appear not as high. He felt that the balconies and planters for the townhouses make the walkway space narrow therefore, should be set back more. He also felt that the brick and clapboard treatment shown were an appropriate use of materials. Bowman's Bakery Bill Luster informed the Board that an awning has been put up at the Bowman's Bakery site on Essex Street. He stated that he has spoken with the owner and Mr. Bowman did not realize that the awning had to recieve design approval. Mr. Luster asked the Board's opinion on how to proceed in this case. The Board felt that the awning adds to the the streetscape, and a letter should be sent to Mr. Bowman acknowledging the awnings presence and also informing him that any other exterior changes must be approved by the Design Review Board. Norman Street Bill Luster informed the Board that a 6' high fence has been erected by the Heritage Plaza condominium association. Mr. Luster informed the Board that he is researching the issue to see if there is a deeded pedestrian easement on the property or whether it is a public. He will inform the Board as to his results and at that time will ask the Board take the necessary action to remove the fence if it is • in violation of any previous agreements. • Newmark Place Stephen Ingemi, Jodi Fenton, Neil Schauer, Roger Soderberg, and Robin Wunderlich appeared before the Board with their proposal for the Newmark Building on Essex Street. They propose to add two stories to the existing building, restore the second and third portion, and renovate the first floor. In the adjacent alleyway a vertical circulation elevator and stairwell for the residential units will be constructed. There will be 2 floors of commercial space and 3 floors of residential space. There will be 21 units of residential two bedroom condominiums on the three upper floors. The will be approximaely 730 s.f. and 970 s.f. It is anticipated that some of the units will have ocean views. Parking provisions include buying or leasing 32 spaces in a municipal parking facility. Fred Johnson asked if the alley is a public way and will it be cut off by the erection of the stairwell. Bill Luster responded that he believed this is a public way and further discussions will have to take place to take appropriate action. Chris Greene asked how high the first story (ground level) is. Mr. Wunderlich replied that the ground level is all one story and is approximately 13-14 ft. in height. Chris Greene expressed his concern regarding the window treatment of the ground . level commenting that the horizontal lines were confusing and gave an appearance of two stories rather than one. He also felt that the top of the building was not detailed enough, since there is such a big cornice the addition should be made to look like it belongs to the building and not like an attachment, but he did not have a problem with the addition of two stories onto the building. Fred Johnson asked if the original entry way had been changed. Mr. Wunderlich replied that the space had been enlarged and made higher and lighter and also this change was done to make a side entry into one of the commercial spaces. Bill Luster made the Board aware that the developers of this project are pursuing a Capitalization Loan from the Salem Redevelopment Authority. Other Business Ann Farnham asked for the status of the Courthouse window replacement. Bill Luster informed her that Debra Hilbert has been in contact with the Massachusetts Historical Commission regarding the design plans. Bill Luster informed the Board that the Salem Redevelopment Authority had conditionally approved the plans of the Salem Housing Authority building at 205 Bridge Street. • Fred Johnson asked if the Board had previously approved the granite fence at the Frye Building. Bill Luster informed the Board that the fence had been approved. There being no further business, Chris Greene made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Fred Johnson seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Respectfully submitted, Bill Luster. • • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Minutes August 20, 1986 The Design Review Board met at 8:30 a.m, on August 20, 1986, in the conference room at One Salem Green. Those in attendance were: Andrea Fish, Debra Hilbert, Ann Farnham, and Michael Lally. The first order of business was to discuss the minutes of the July 30, 1986 meeting. Andrea Fish made a motion to approve the minutes. Debra Hilbert seconded the motion. All were in favor, motion so carried. Essex House Development Elaine Finbury and Tony Cassendino appeared before the Board to discuss in detail the plans for the Essex House. Mr. Cassendino explained that the project will have underground parking that would be accessed by doing away with two public parking spaces in the Crombie Street parking lot. Mr. Cassendino informed the Board that there will be space made available for retail and/or commercial use on the first level of the building. He showed the Board plans for the north and east elevations of the building. The north elevation will take on an historic facade of the 1900's perhaps with a clock on the top. The building will consist mainly of brick. There will be an elevator, dormers and bays on the east elevation, and the building will have a metal roof. The top floors may have water views and will be duplex units. • Debra Hilbert asked what materials the windows would consist of. Mr. Cassendino replied that there would be metal frame windows on the building. Andrea Fish raised a concern she had with the design of the street space on Essex Street. She suggested that the false openings be better aligned with the upper story windows. Bill Luster requested that at the next meeting a drawing of the west elevation be presented to the Board along with samples of colors, base materials, brick type, roof materials, window details, and that the concern of the window grills in the garage be addressed. Window Replacement for Essex County Courthouse Randy Johnson presented preliminary plans to the Board for the window replacement of the Courthouse Building, the Registry Building, the Superior Courthouse Buidling, and to stabalize the condition of the tower. Mr. Johnson explained that the window sashes have detiorated and the sills and frames have rotted. The wood sashes would be replaced with a two over two aluminum window system. The, Board felt that these buidlings were very important and felt that Debra Hilbert, historic preservationist, should research the situation in detail to determine what is appropriate for these buildings. • WeAweinrssuch investigation, Ms. Hilbert will discuss the project with the Board � • Page 2 China Square Mr. Bob Miklos presented to the Board plans for the rear elevation of the proposed new building at the Peabody Block. There are no windows because of the State fire code, but it does have marble panels to relieve the facade. The adjacent Post Office Building will have windows, glass doors, balcony rails, and also will house an elevator and a stairwell. Andrea Fish raised a concern regarding tower like projection on the Essex Street facade of the Post Office Building. Mr. Miklos explained that the tower would be visible from Essex Street, but he was not sure if it could be seen from Washington Street since it is setback towards the middle of the roof. One of the towers on the roof is a penthouse and the other is the elevator shaft which extends approximately eighteen feet above the roof line because it houses the gear work for the elevator shaft. Mr. Miklos informed the Board that the mutons in the windows on Washington - Street will be restored and carried around to the Essex Street facade to give the ground floor a more consistent character. Andrea Fish raised a concern about the Essex Street facade. She felt that this side • of the building was very visible and the windows especially on the upper stories be improved. Mr. Miklos agreed to try to improve the side facade and give it more of a comtemporary feeling. Debra Hilbert expressed her concern about the heavy massing on the roof. She felt that the plans try to make it look to much like a facade than a roof. Mr. Miklos assured the Board that he would address that and other concerns raised at the meeting and would be back with new drawings. Town House Square Place Mr. Donald Burnham and John Savasta appeared before the Board for final approval of the design of Town House Square Place. Mr. Savasta explained that he had recessed the dormers according to the Board's suggestion. He further stated that the roof will be a mansard copper roof. Plans were shown to the Board of the rear elevation. There is a terrace on the second level consisting of brick, wood and steel rails. This treatment serves as relief for the facade and privacy for the occupants. There will be trees planted in the common space. There is also an overhang to screen the dumpster. There are double hung windows set into the mansard that are exactly like the front elevation. The windows, roof design and iron railings add interest as you look up at the . building. Andrea Fish asked what color the cornices and woodwork would be. • Page 3 Mr. Savasta replied that the woodwork would be a light cream color. The Board raised their concerns about the materials that will be used on the sign band of the building. Mr. Savasta replied that he hopes to use wood, but it all depends on what kind of material is behind the structure now, and it cannot be determined until demolition begins. Mr. Savasta informed the Board that the dormers have been lowered and foot and the corner of the building has also been brought in at the request of the Board. Andrea Fish asked if the building is flush with the Masonic Temple. Mr. Savasta replied that it protrudes slightly and will continue to do so. The mansard will be set back where it meets the cornice and will not hang over the other buildings. Debra Hilbert suggested that the developer return after demolition to show us exactly how the buildings will be aligned, samples of materials and colors, and to resolve other concerns such as the sign band. Debra Hilbert and Andrea Fish had some concerns about the window sizes on the • front elevation. Mr. Savasta suggested that he could open the window spaces up. He stated he will do a new perspective drawing for the Board. Debra Hilbert made a motion to approve the additional stories and general design of the building conditional upon field verification and approval of samples of colors, roof materials, dormer materials. Andrea Fish seconded the motion. All were in favor, motion so carried. 2 Lynde Street Mr. Luster informed the Board that a design change for the window on 2 Lynde Street was voted upon by the Board, but after some discussion with the North Shore Childrens Hospital it was decided to keep the existing window. He asked the Board if they had any objections to this request. Ann Farnham made a motion to amend the previous design by allowing the existing window to remain. Andrea Fish seconded the motion. All were in favor, motion so carried. Salem Housing Authority Mr. Joe Carrol appeared before the Board with plans for the elderly housing complex on 205 Bridge Street. He explained that the building is now brick. • Debra Hilbert asked why a wood building was not acceptable to EOCD. . Page 4 Mr. Carrol explained that EOCD felt that the maintenance costs of a wood building would be prohibitive. Mr. Carrol reminded the Board that they had previously approved the footprint of the building but had not approved the elevations. Mr. Carrol explained to the Board that there are no bays as previous plans had indicated. The parking facilities and tree placements had not changed, and EOCD had some concern over granite posts on the gates. They felt that funds should be used on the building. Mr. Carrol showed the current plans to the Board. Debra Hilbert suggested that the entrance way be located in the center of the building. Mr. Carrol responded that EOCD wants the entrance into the Community Room. Ms. Hilbert then suggested some sort of design in the center. Andrea Fish felt that there were too many shutters on the building. She also suggested that the windows be recessed and peaked roofs be placed on the building to give it a more residential feeling and also make it look more the church next to • the site. Andrea Fish asked what the roof material, and brick color would be. Mr. Carrol responded that the the roof material would be asphalt, and that when he returns with updated drawings he will bring brick samples. There being no further business Debra Hilbert made a motion to adjourn. Andrea Fish seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Respetfully submitted, Bill Luster • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Minutes August 27, 1986 The Design Review Board met at 8:30 a.m. on August 27 1986> in the conference room at One Salem Green. Those in attendance were: Andrea Fish, Ann Farnham, Chris Greene, Debra Hilbert, and Fred Johnson. China Square Mr. Padnos and Mr. Miklos appeared before the Board to address concerns discussed at a previous meeting regarding the China Square development. The first concern dealt with the roof design. Mr. Miklos felt that instead of using metal on the roof he would use a wood cornice painted white with balustrades similar to the 1880 MacIntrye architecture so prevelant in the City. The storefronts will also be painted white. Mr. Miklos also informed the Board that he had done some research regarding an hydraulic gear elevator verses a mechanical gear elevator because of the tower effect on top of the building. He felt that an hydraulic elevator could not adequately service six floors and thirty-six units. He also pointed out that the penthouse was only sixteen feet above the roof deck and the fire stairs were only ten feet above the roof deck. Mr. Miklos showed the Board new drawings of the penthouse where he articulated the structure and windows so that it was better intergrated into the building. Ann Farnham requested that a complete set of up-to-date drawings be submitted to the Board. Debra Hilbert made a motion to approve the design with the understanding that the Board has the right to review the plans for the public park, and to review the railings, and marble design change to the building. Chris Greene seconded the motion. All were in favor, motion so carried. Essex House Elaine Finbury and Tony Cassendino appeared before the Board to address concerns discussed at a previous meeting. The first concern was the treatment of the first story windows. Mr. Cassendino suggested that grills be used in between the columns with some type of openings. He felt that these openings should no longer be treated as windows because they are not. Chris Greene felt this was a much better treatment than the previous one. Andrea Fish still had some concerns and asked Mr. Cassendino if more pillars could be added to the plan. Mr. Cassendino felt that this would not alleviate the problem but suggested that perhaps the openings could be made larger. • Page 2 Mr. Cassendino showed the Board color and brick samples. The first drawing he exhibited to the Board consisted of brick and beige and dark maroon, and slate gray for colors. The second drawing consisted of brick and dark and light green color combinations. The Board preferred the second drawing because they felt it broke up the mass of the building. They requested to review the mortar color to be used. Debra Hilbert made a motion to approve the plans conditional upon the approval of the redesign of the garage level and field verification of brick-type and window trim design. Fred Johnson seconded the motion. All were in favor, motion so carried. There being no further business Andrea Fish made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Debra Hilbert seconded the motion. All were in favor, motion so carried. Respectfully submitted, Bill Luster • Salem Redevelopment 4-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744-4580 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD August 20, 1986 AGENDA 1. Roll Call Andrea Fish Debra Hilbert Chris Greene Anne Farnham Michael Lally Frederick Johnson 2. Approve minutes of DRB meeting held on July 30, 1986. • 3. Items 1. China Square/Peabody Block - Michael Padnos 2. Town House Square/T.R. Kerr Building - Donald Burnham 3. Essex House/Salem Theatre - Elaine Finbury 4. Salem Housing Authority - Bill Feldkamp, TAC & Elaine Hart, SHA IAS Salem Redevelopment 44-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744 -4580 TO: DRB Members FROM: Bill Luster RE: August 20th Meeting DATE: August 15, 1986 A Design Review Board meeting has been scheduled for Wednesday, August 20, 1986. The items on the agenda are as follows: China Square - Michael Padnos will be presenting final design plans for his mixed use development at the Peabody Block. At the last meeting several concerns were raised by Board members which will be addressed at Wednesday's meeting. • The project is scheduled for final review by the SRA at their August 25th meeting. Town House Square - Donald Burnham will be presenting final design plans for his mixed use office/retail/residential development at the T.R. Kerr Building. This project was reviewed in detail at a previous meeting and John Savasta, the project architect, will provide information relative to the concerns that were raised. Essex House - Elaine Finbury will be attending Wednesday's meeting along with Tony Casendino, the project architect, to present design plans for her 41 unit residential development at the Salem Theatre. The project includes 31 underground parking spaces which will be available to the residents of the development. The Board of Appeal has granted a variance from the parking requirements for the project. Therefore, the remaining parking spaces will be provided off-site. • Salem Housing Authority - The Salem Housing Authority will be attending Wednesday's meeting to present design plans for a 35 unit elderly housing complex at Bridge and Ash Streets. As you know, the Housing Authority presented plans previously for a wood frame building with a wood cladboard exterior. While the treatment was preliminarily approved by the DRB, it was rejected by the Massachusetts Executive Office of Communities and Development (EOCD) which is the Housing Authority's funding source. Following this rejection, EOCD countered with the possibility of utilizing vinyl siding on the building. This proposal was rejected by SRA staff. At Wednesday's meeting the Housing Authority will present an updated design for a brick building as well as a site design for the parcel. • • E-WP/DRB Memo 8/15/86 r � r Salem • Redevelopment 44-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 0970 TELEPHONE 744 -4580 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD July 30, 1986 AGENDA 1. Roll Call Andrea Fish Debra Hilbert Chris Greene Anne Farnham Michael Lally Frederick Johnson 2. Approve minutes of DRB meeting held on June 4, 1986 • 3. Items 1. Peabody Block-Michael Padnos 2. T.R. Kerr Building-Donald Burnham 3. LaTrattoria Azura-Sign Permit 4. O'Brien Ambulance-Sign Permit 5. Pickering Oil/Central Plaza-Sign Permit 6. Atlantic Computer-Sign Permit 7. Goodyear/Derby St.-Sign Permit DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Minutes July 30, 1986 The Design Review Board met at 9:00 a.m. on July 30, 1986, in the conference room at One Salem Gfeen. Those in attendance were: Frederick Johnson, Andrea Fish, and Debra Hilbert. The first order of business was to discuss the minutes of the June 4, 1986 meeting. Andrea Fish made a motion to approve the minutes. Debra Hilbert seconded the motion. All were in favor, motion so carried. SIGN PERMITS Mr. Don Morse from Signworks presented applications for two signs at 24-26 Congress Street. The first application was for LaTrattoria Azure and the second for North Shore Ambulance. He presented photographs of the site, and drawings of the signs. The signs are to be centered horizontally on the building and centered vertically in between the brick and ledge as illustrated in the photographs shown. Andrea Fish suggested that the signs be centered over the large set of windows shown in the photograph and not over each side of the building. Debra Hilbert asked if the lights shown on the building were being removed. Mr. Morse replied no, but he informed the Board that the signs will fit above the lights. Debra Hilbert suggested that the lights should either be moved or removed unless they are being used to light the entrance to the building. Andrea Fish asked what colors would be used for the signs. Mr. Morse replied that the signs will have white background with dark blue lettering and a dark blue border. The North Shore Ambulance sign will have a ship in a circle carved into the sign. Fred Johnson asked Mr. Morse why the signs match. He pointed out that they represent two totally different services, and there should be some type of distinction made. Mr. Morse replied that the owner of the building wanted the signs to match and also pointed out that North Shore Ambulance's colors are blue and white. Fred Johnson then suggested that the sign colors be reversed in the sign for LaTrattoria Azure or that the restaurant owners have the opportunity to choose other colors. Fred Johnson made a motion to approve the North Shore Ambulance sign with the condition that it be centered over the one large double set of windows and that the sign permit for LaTrattoria Azure be approved with the condition that the colors be reversed or other colors chosen. 30 , . The motion was seconded by Andrea Fish. All were in favor, motion so carried. Mr. Morse presented to the Board an application for a sign at the Odell Block for Atlantic Computer. He informed the Board that an existing sign will be moved to this new location. The sign is 12' and will be centered along a 20' brown sign band. The sign is dark blue with gold leaf lettering and has a gold band. The letters will be 9" in height. " Andrea Fish made a motion to approve the sign as presented. Fred Johnson seconded the motion. All were in favor, motion so carried. Mr. Morse presented a sign application to the Board for Pickering Oil Company at Centra Plaza. The existing sign will be replaced with a sign bearing the trademark of Whaleco, Pickering Oil's parent company. It will have a gray background with dark blue lettering. The whale insigna whill be white and dark blue. Debra Hilbert made a motion to approve the sign as presented. Fred Johnson seconded the motion. All were in favor, motion so carried. Mr. DeStoop appeared before the Board to replace existing signs at the Goodyear Tire Center on Derby Street. He would like to replace the Sousa tire sign with a sign reading Auto Service Center. He also requested that the free standing sign on the property be changed. Mr. Luster informed Mr. DeStoop that the Board cannot approve a free standing sign in tha area, however he informed Mr. DeStoop that the sign was grandfathered • and as long as it is not changed it can remain. Mr. DeStoop then requested that he replace the Sousa sign with a sign reading Certified Auto Service Center with the Certified logo. All letters will be white. He assured the Board that the lettering will not exceed the length set forth in the Sign Ordinance: The letters will be capitalized and could be scaled down to adhere to the guidelines of the Sign Ordinance. Mr. Luster requested the Mr. DeStoop redraw the plans with the changes that have been discussed. T.R. Kerr Building Mr. Donald Burnham and Mr. John Savasta appeared before the Board to present their design plans for their mixed use developement project at the T.R. Kerr Building. Mr. Savasta explained that there are three separate buildings included in the project. Two floors will be added to the former Foodland building and to the T.R. Kerr Building so that the roof will be in alignment with the Masonic Temple. The roof will be constructed out of copper and the brick used will match the existing. There will be french style dormers on the building. Mr. Savasta stated that because of the heavy cornice line, he tried to give the effect of adding a roof instead of two floors to the building. Andrea Fish suggested that the dormers be set into the building more so that not so much white can be seen and that the top of the dormers not extend to the top roof line. Fred Johnson asked to see a drawing of what the rear elevation is going to look like. �Z3 Saly -30 f • Mr. Savasta explained that the entrance is set back and will be used as a pedestrian walkway. He also informed the Board that he is trying to put in a wooden sign bandahc to keep all the street signSuniform. He stated that he is trying to use wood wherever possible, but is is difficult due to the guidelines in the Building and Fire Codes. The Board requested to see more detailed drawings of the dormers and sign band, a list of materials and color of the proposed awning and all other exterior parts of the building before final approval can be given to the project. Peabody Block Mr. Michael Padnos appeared before the Board to present his design plans for the Peabody Block developement. He explained to the Board his plans for the park on the corner of Washington and Essex Streets for which the City has applied for a CDAG and has committed to acquire the private parcel located on part of the corner lot. Debra Hilbert asked what will happen if the City does not receive the CDAG. Mr. Padnos responded that the park will still be built. Mr. Padnos explainded to the Board that there will be an underground parking facility and all cars will enter at Barton Square. He went on to explain in detail the drawings of each elevation of the building, and he explained the area which will • be called China Terrace. Andrea Fish asked what the timetable was on the project. Mr. Padnos replied that as soon as the DRB, SRA, and Planning Board give him the required approvals, he will begin construction. The Board asked Mr. Padnos for a drawing of the rear elevation of the Gas Building. They also stated that the Washington St. elevation is missing a "tower" in one of the drawings and would like the roof line clarified. They also had a question regarding the top two brick windows on the Essex Street elevation. The Baord also stated that there is an obvious difference in the treatments of the Washington Street frontage and the Essex Street frontage and wanted clarification for such treatment. The Board wanted detail drawings of the french doors on the Essex Street side of the Post Office Building, all window detail, and material samples before final approval can be given to the project. Mr. Padnos stated he would address all the Board's concerns at the next scheduled meeting. Bill Luster informed the Board that the next scheduled meeting will be held on August 20, 1986 at 9:00 a.m.. There being no further business, Andrea Fish made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Fred Johnson seconded the motion. All were in favor motion so carried. Respectfully submitted, • Bill Luster IAS Salem • Redevelopment 446900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744.4580 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD JUNE 4, 1986 AGENDA 1. Roll Call: John Emerson Andrea Fish Debra Hilbert Chris Greene Anne Farnham Michael Lally Frederick Johnson • 2. Approve minutes of DRB meetings held on April 11 & 23, 1986. 3. Items 1. Essex House 2. Peabody Block 3. 10 Crombie Street 4. Town House Square Place 5. Sign Permit — Bank of New England • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Minutes June 4, 1986 The Design Review Board met at 9:00 a.m. on June 4, 1986, in the conference room at One Salem Green. Those in attendance were: Ann Farnham, Debra Hilbert, Frederick Johnson, Chris Greene, and Andrea Fish. The first order of business was to discuss the minutes of the April 11 and April 23 meetings. Debra Hilbert made a motion to approve the minutes. Chris Greene seconded, the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Essex House Development Elaine Finbury and Tony Casendino presented plans for the construction of 41 rental units at the Salem Theatre site. Mr. Casendino passed out elevations of the site to the Board members. He expressed his concern regarding the effect which this building would have on the street scape of Essex Street and asked the members to comment. Mr. Casendino pointed out that this development would be the highest building on the street. He informed the Board that he could use a steel frame on the building and take two feet off each floor to lower the building. The building would be comprised mostly of brick, brick banding on the first floor, which will be retail space, a metal, most likely copper, roof, and • window bays trimmed with metal or wood. Debra Hilbert commented that she was concerned with the height of the building especially because of the open lot next to it. She suggested that the roof line be dropped down. Elaine Finbury informed the board that a CDAG application has been submitted for public improvements and underground parking for the lot. She suggested that landscaping, more specifically, the use of shrubs and green belting in the front portion of lot would alleviate some of the elevation problems. Chris Greene asked if the height could be redistributed along the building. g Mr. Casendino replied that he could move the units around and turn the ridge line, so it would be parallel to Essex Street rather than perpendicular. Debra Hilbert asked Mr. Casendino to explain what will be seen on the first level. Mr. Casendino explained that there will be some unuseable space but non—reflective windows will be used so that no one can see inside. There are glass on metal panels that are used for this purpose. There • will also be commercial space on Essex Street. Mr. Casendino also commented that the buildings across the street from this site cast shadows on the first floor so that it was a wise decision not to use .� that space for residential units. .r; ��X Page 2 • Debra Hilbert asked Mr. Casendino to explain the detail of the windows. Mr. Casendino replied that he would use some sort of decoration over the window and a lintel or a sill and do some sort of trim. He will not use casements because they are hard to repair. Andrea Fish expressed her concern with the west elevation. She felt that it should be made to look like a front of a building and not an end wall. This could be done by turning the ridge line of the building. I Fred Johnson also stated his concern in this matter. He felt this should not be a blank wall since it dominates the square at Essex and North Streets. Mr. Casendino stated that they could not place bays on this side, since the building has to be recessed five feet from the neighboring building, but there will be windows and other types of openings. Chris Greene expressed his concern for the mass of building. He questioned whether a commercial strip could handle a 70 foot building. . It would have a tremendous impact on both directions of Essex Street. He also stated that he did not like the idea of the overhang on Essex Street. He also asked when they hoped construction would begin. • Ms. Finbury stated that she hoped construction could begin by the summer. 10-12 Crombie Street Mr. David Jaquith appeared before the Board to receive approval for a change in the entrance to the parking area of his two unit condominium building. Mr. Jaquith explained that he is having a problem with an abutter regarding an easement. Mr. Jaquith. constructed a gate way leaving a twelve foot clearance for cars to enter the abutting property. The clearance is tight and Mr. Jaquith is proposing to take the gate way down. Mr. Jaquith also informed the Board that he would like to put a iron rail balcony on the south elevation of the building. Debra Hilbert suggested that the pedestrian entrance should remain and be capped off and a wrought iron gate should be installed. Bill Luster asked Mr. Jaquith the status of the fence that was approved to be installed. Mr. Jaquith responded that his abutter had a problem with the inability to see around the fence, and it was taken down. Andrea Fish and Chris Greene stated that perhaps the fence could be placed further back to alleviate the sight problems and to protect the • parked cars. They also agreed that some kind of fence should be constructed as originally approved. Page 3 • A Fred Johnson suggested that Mr. Jaquith and the Board walk down to the site to more clearly assess the situation. Bank of New England - Sign Permit Bill Luster presented to the Board a change in the sign for the Bank of New England. The sign will be changed from Bank of New England North Shore to Bank of New England. The sign will remain the same in all other aspects and will be centered across the window. Chris Greene made a motion to approve the sign change. Andrea Fish seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. The Board decided that their next meeting would be held on June 19th to discuss the upcoming developments on Essex Street. At this time the Board proceeded to conduct a site visit at 10-12 Crombie Street. At the site the Board approved Mr. Jaquith' s plan according to the following conditions: - A 4' high fence be installed which runs from the rear property . line to a point which is 10' from the Crombie Streetproperty line. - A 20" wrought iron gate and deck be installed along the south - elevation. - Wrought iron rails be installed to replace existing wood rails on the top floor windows on the east and west elevations. There being no further business, Fred Johnson made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Debbie Hilbert seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Respectfully submitted, Bill Luster I # Salem 0 Redevelopment 4-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744 4580 TO: DRB MEMBERS FROM: BILL LUSTER RE: AGENDA/JUNE 4, 1986 DATE: JUNE 2, 1986 ESSEX HOUSE — At our 'last meeting, Elaine Finbury presented plans for the construction of a 41 unit apartment. complex at the site of the former Salem Theatre at 289 Essex Street. Current plans provide for the construction of below grade parking for 31 automobiles . and off—site parking provisions for 31 automobiles. Ms. Finbury has received the necessary variances from the Board of Appeals and would like to begin construction immediately following _ design approval. Ms. Finbury will be attending Wednesday' s meeting with Anthony Casendino, her architect, to begin the design review of this project. PEABODY_BLOCK At out last meeting, Michael Padnos appeared before the board to present his red_ve?.opment proposal for the Peabody Block. The China Square Development is a $12.6M project which provides for tha renovation and new construction of the five buildings commonly referred to as the Peabody Block. Plans provide for the construction of 12,000 square feet of first floor office space, 75 residential condominiums and 90 at grade and below grade level parking spaces. Mr. Padnos will be attending Wednesday' s meeting to present his plans to the board and begin the Design Review on this project. 10 CROMBIE STREET Several months agc, the DRB approved design plans for a 2 unit condominium building at 10 Crombie Street. Construction is nearing completion and David Jacquith, the developer, has proposed a change in the entrance to the parking area. He will be attending Wednesday' s meeting to present his change to the board. • Page 2 TOWN HOUSE SQUARE PLACE The SRA has received a proposal from the Urban Development Action Group for the renovation of the property which currently houses T.R. Kerr Furniture and Finkle' s restaurant. Donald Burnham, principal developer of the project will attend Wednesday' s meeting with his architect to begin the design review of this project. Town House Square Place is comprised of 35.000 square feet of rental office space, 43,500 square feet of office condominiums and 34 residential condominiums. The developer is proposing an additional two stories on the building to facilitate the residential condominiums. • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Minutes April 23, 1986 The Design Review Board held a special meeting in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green. Those in attendance were: Debbie Hilbert, Andrea Fish, Fred Johnson, John Emerson, and Michael Lally. The purpose of the meeting was to vote on final approval of the Asian Export addition to the Peabody Museum. Emily Kuo, Fisk Crowell, and Gerhardt Kallman, architects representing the Museum, provided the Board members with drawings and photographs illustrating the rear facade of the proposed addition. Having no questions, Andrea Fish motioned to accept the plans as proposed with the exception of the landscaping plans .which will be presented to the Board at a later date. John Emerson seconded the • motion. All were in favor, motion so carried. There being no further business, Debbie Hilbert made a motion to adjourn the special meeting. The motion was seconded by Fred Johnson, all were in favor, motion so carried. Respectfully submitted, William Luster • Salem Redevelopment 44-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 7444580 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APRIL 11, 1986 AGENDA 1 . Roll Call John Emerson Andrea Fish Debra Hilbert Chris Greene Anne Farnham Michael Lally Frederick Johnson 2. Approve minutes of DRB meeting held on March 12, 1986 • 3. Items 1. Essex House Development — Elaine Finbury 2. Rufus Choate House — Elaine Finbury 3. 235 Bridge Street — Annie Harris 4. Peabody Block — Michael Padnos 5. T.R. Kerr Building — Donald Burnham 6. Firehouse Coffee Shop — Mickey Mirra 7. Lobster Shanty — Sign Permit Design Review Board Minutes April 11, 1986 • The Design Review Board met at 9:00 a.m. on April 11, 1986, in the conference room at One Salem Green. Those in attendance were: Ann Farnham, Debra Hilbert, Frederick Johnson, and John Emerson. The first order of business was to discuss the minutes of the March 12 meeting. Ann Farnham made a motion to approve the minutes. Debra Hilbert seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Rufus Choate House Elaine Finbury appeared before the Board with her plans to rehabilitate the rear wing of the Rufus Choate House into one residential apartment. She explained that the roof line would be changed and be replaced with a flat roof. The windows would be replaced by two over two windows and the existing door would be rehabilitated. The siding would be taken off and new clapboards would be put up and painted to match the existing portion of the building. She stated that she has spoken with the owner adjacent to her property to obtain a right of way to enable a car to park in the rear, however the owner would not allow this. She informed the Board that there is resident parking on '"the street. Debra Hilbert made a motion to approve the plans as presented. Ann Farnham seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. • Essex House Development Elaine Finbury presented preliminary design plans to the Board for construction of the Essex House. They included plans of the interior, the proposed storefronts, the installation of an elevator and parking. Ann Farnham asked how many units would be constructed. Elaine Finbury responded that 41 rental units would be constructed on the site. Debra Hilbert asked how high the proposed building would be. Elaine Finbury informed the Board that the building would be four stories high. John Emerson asked if the massing of this building was consistent with the area. Elaine Finbury replied in the affirmative. Fred Johnson asked if this project was consistent with the study John Collins did for the uses in Heritage Plaza East. Bill Luster said he would look into this. Page 2 • Bill Luster informed the Board that at future meetings the plans can be looked at in more detail. This presentation was just to familiarize the members with the proposed project. 235 Bridge Street Annie Harris and Robin Wunderlich appeared before the Board to amend the front and rear entrance design plans. They proposed to eliminate the currently approved glasswork and replace it with windows for ventilation of the entrance ways. Debra Hilbert made a motion to amend the previous approval of the front and rear entrance ways. Fred Johnson seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Peabody Block Michael Padnos appeared before the Board with his preliminary design plans for the five buildings known as the Peabody Block. Mr. Padnos stated that. the project entailed adding one story to the Peabody building and two stories to the Post Office building and taking down the building housing the Division of Employment. Securities and rebuilding on the site. He stated that he realizes these buildings have some historic significance but he will not apply for historic tax credits. When he is finished he will have a seven story building consisting of 75 • residential condominiums, office condominiums on the ground floor, and a two level parking facility. Bill Luster informed the Board that this presentation was just preliminary and the Baord will be reviewing more detailed plans at a latter date. Lobster Shanty Harry Rhodes, the new owner of the Lobster Shanty, submitted a sign design for the Board to review. The sign would be wooden and hang from an existing pole in the Marketplace. The sign would be light grey and maroon with gold leaf. Fred Johnson made a motion to approve the sign as presented. Debra Hilbert seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Old Business Bill Luster informed the Board that a short meeting would be called to vote on approval for the Peabody Museum rear facade plans. The architects were not able to attend this meeting. - There being no further business Fred Johnson made a motion to adjourn the meeting. . Ann Farnham seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD April 11, 1986 SUMMARY Rufus Choate House Elaine Finbury presented plans for the restoration of the rear wing of the Rufus Choate House located at 14 Lynde Street. The restoration includes changing the roof line, rehabilitating the door and windows, and removing the existing siding and replacing it with new clapboards. The addition will be painted to match the existing building. DRB ACTION: Recommended approval of the restoration. Essex House Development, Elaine Finbury presented preliminary design plans for the • construction of 41 rental apartments at the Salem Theatre site. DRB ACTION: No action taken. 235 Bridge Street X The Federal Street Development team approached the Board for a minor amendment to their entrance design. The amendment involved 'eliminating the glasswork at the central and rear entrance ways of the building. DRB ACTION:` Recommended approval of the plan as amended. Peabody Block Mr. Michael Padnos presented preliminary design plans for the five buildings known as the Peabody Block. His plans include 75 residential condominiums, office space on the ground floors, and a parking garage. DRB ACTION: No action taken. Lobster Shanty A sign design for the Lobster Shanty was presented for review. The sign would be wooden and hang from the existing poles in the Marketplace. It would be light grey and maroon with gold leaf. DRB ACTION: Recommended approval of the sign. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD April 10, 1986 • Essex House Development — Elaine Finbury will be presenting preliminary design plans for the construction of 41 rental apartments at the site of the Salem Theatre. Ms. Finbury' s proposal calls for the demolition of the threatre and the creation of a six—story building in its place. Ms. Finbury would like to present her plans at Thursday' s meeting and begin the specific review procedure at a subsequent meeting. Rufus Choate House — Elaine Finbury will be presenting plans for the restoration of the rear wing of the Rufus Choate House located at 14 Lynde Street. The major portion of this project was completed in 1981 with financing assistance from the SRA. This work will constitutethe completion of the project. 235 Bridge Street — The Federal Street Devlopment team will be approaching the board for a minor amendment to their entrance design at 235 Bridge Street. The amendment concerns theg lass work which occurs at the central entrance. Annie Harris and Robin Wunderlich of Scagliotti Associates will be presenting the proposed amendment. • Peabody Block — As you probably know the Peabody Block is in the process of being purchased and renovated into a mixed use office/residential condominium complex. Michael Padnos will be presenting preliminary plans to the Board to begin what will most likely be a lengthy design review of the five buildings which comprise this parcel. T.R. Kerr Building — Donald Burnham of Urban Development Action Group will be attending Friday' s meeting to present design plans for the Townhouse Square Office and Residential Development proposal for 234 —242 Essex Street. Mr. Burnham' s proposal is for the rehabilitation of the existing space as office condominiums and the addition of two floors for residential condominiums. He is also proposing to remove the existing yellow brick face from the former Foodland building and reconstruct it with red brick. Firehouse Coffee Shop — Michael Mirra, proprietor of The Firehouse Coffee Shop, will be presenting final design plans for the greenhouse structure which he would like to construct over his existing open—air cafe. • Lobster Shanty — Harry Rhodes, the new owner of the Lobster Shanty, will present a sign design for review. Salem Redevelopment 44-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744-4580 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MARCH 12, 1986 AGENDA 1 . Roll Call. John Emerson Andrea Fish ' Debra Hilbert. Chris Greene . Anne Farnham Michael Lally Frederick Johnson 2. Approve minutes of DRB meeting held on February 5 3. Items 1 . Firehouse Coffee Shop & Greenhouse Addition/Preliminary Design Review 2. Heritage Cooperative Bank/Sign Issue 3. NSCH Thrift ShoplPreliminary- Design Review 4. 7-11 Convenience Store/Preliminary Design Review 5. Peabody Museum Addition/Rear Facade and Landscaping Reviews Design Review Board Minutes March 12, 1986 The Design Review Board met at 9:00 a.m. on March 12, in the conference room at One Salem Green. Those in attendance were: John Emerson, Andrea Fish, Debra Hilbert, Chris Greene, and Anne Farnham. The first order of business was to discuss the minutes of the February 5 meeting. Chris Greene made a motion to approve the minutes. Debra Hilbert seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. 7-11 Convenience Store Bill Luster informed the Board that due to the expansion of the Urban Renewal Area, this Board now has the authority of design approval for proposed 7-11 on the corner of Derby and Congress Streets. Chris D'Liberti, a representative for the Southland Corporation, presented plans for a 7-11 convenience mart on the corner lot of Derby and Congress Streets. Chris Greene asked what the new Urban Renewal Area boundaries were, and he also asked what the Bowditch Park plan that was once proposed for this area comprised of. • Bill luster informed the Board of the new boundaries and informed Mr. Greene that he was not familar with the Bowditch Park plan, but the current plan for the South River development is a mixed use retail and residential one. John Emerson asked what guidelines should be used in reviewing this 7-11 project. Bill Luster responded that the criteria used should be the Urban Renewal—Heritage Plaza East guidelines. Andrea Fish noted that the proposed plan does not conform to the guidlines of Heritage Plaza area. Debra Hilbert stated that she was concerned with the set back requirements for the property. Chris Greene asked if the Southland Corporation had a copy of the design criteria guidlines. Bill Luster responded that they were given a copy of the criteria. Andrea Fish asked Mr. D'Liberti if the architects can customize the standard design to meet the criteria. • Mr. D'Liberti responded that he did not have the authority to do so. Page 2 • Andrea Fish made a motion that Mr. D'Liberti be given a copy of the urban design criteria and the Southland Corporation using these guidelines try to redesign the building. Debra Hilbert seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Bill Luster informed Mr. D'Liberti that he would make himself available to go over the design criteria for this project. Firehouse Coffee Shop David Jaquith and Michael Mirra presented their proposal of a greenhouse addition to Mr. Mirra'a existing coffee shop. Mr. Jaquith explained the current plan is to attach a small greenhouse onto what is currently a sidewalk cafe. Chris Greene asked if the land was a public way. Mr. Jaquith responded that this parcel is City—owned land adjacent to a public way. He went on to state that Mr. Mirra is running out of space and would like to remain in his present location. Mr. Jaquith also commented that perhaps the idea of constructing a bigger addition rather than a smaller one is also a design option. At this time, Bill Luster explained to the Board that the SRA has several obstacles to overcome regarding this project such as lease agreements, and easements, but they felt that the DRB should review the plans before any further action is taken. Chris Greene stated that he felt the proposal is a feasible one. He felt that the better plan is to make the greenhouse larger to be in scale with the existing building, and he also stated that the landscaping aspect of the project should be reviewed in detail. He felt that the structure should be as transparent as possible. Debra Hilbert suggested that clapboard instead of glass be used at the base of the structure. Andrea Fish and Chris Greene disagreed with using clapboard. Mr. Jaquith commented that clapboard may not be the best choice, if the structure has to be dismantled. Andrea Fish asked Mr. Mirra how he intends to keep this structure comfortable in the summer months. Mr. Mirra responded that air conditioning will be installed, the glass on the roof will be tinted and shades will be used to keep the sun out. Chris Greene suggested that a garage type door similar to the ones used at Quincy Market be used. • Page 3 • John Emerson felt that the idea was a solvable one and that the design problem can be solved. At this time the board asked Mr. Jaquith to return with more detailed designs for thier review. Heritage Cooperative Bank Mr. Peter Copelas appeared before the Board to obtain permission to waive a previous sign condition approval. Mr. Copelas explained to the Board that when he began the restoration of the window lights to relocate the Household Finance sign he found that there were no windows behind the green panelling. Mr. Copelas stated that he is planning to restore the windows, but at this time he is unable to take on such a large expense. He asked the Board to waive this amendment and informs the Board that within five years the storefront will be restored to its original state. He asked the Board permission to paint the existing green panelling to match the other storefronts. Chris Greene questioned whether all the storefronts are the same color. He suggested that the Board look into this matter and that the Board have the authority to choose the paint color. Mr. Copelas also appeared before the Board to obtain approval to fill a four foot gap between the Kinsman Block and the Heritage Cooperative Bank, and to extend the brick wall. Debra Hilbert felt that there should be an 18" setback to the brick wall. Mr. Copelas agreed. Debra Hilbert made a motion to approve the sign as amended and -to approve the filling of the gap between buildings. Chris Greene seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Peabody Museum Fisk Crowell and Emily Kuo appeared before the Board with preliminary landscaping designs and illustrations of the proposed elevation of the south facade. Mr. Crowell explained that the existing Linden tree will remain where it is so that three additional parking spaces can be utilized. He went on to explain that along the back elevation Beach and Linden trees will be planted to mask the loading dock, and Evergreen trees will be planted in front of the windows. Mr. Greene commented on the landscaping design regarding the line of trees the architects proposed. He felt the trees should be placed in a • beds. He also asked the architects if any changes were made to the facade. Page 4 Mr. Crowell answered no, but he brought several photographs to illustrate the 1" recess. Debra Hilbert and Andrea Fish expressed their concern with the current design stating that they still felt the recesses looked liked blocked up windows. Chris Greene agreed that he also has problems with this design. He feels that the facade looks like a factory or some kind of industrial building, not like a museum. He also stated that the most prominent and least screened facade is the loading dock. - Mr. Crowell stated that this facade was not the front of the building, and he feels that a change in pattern would not solve the overall impression, but he would provide additional sketches to the Board to review. Mr. Greene informed Mr. Crowell that he does realize this is the back of a building, but it is the back of a museum not an industrial park. The opportunity exists to use several design feature decoration. He stated the current design is an unfortunate choice of decoration. We are not asking you to change the mass of the building just its design. At this time Emily Kuo informed the Board that any changes made to the facade must be approved by the museum' s Board of Trustees. Mr. Crowell suggested that different color bricks could be used to form a pattern on the facade to make it appear it is not one continous plane. North Shore Childrens Hospital Thrift Shop Bill Luster informed the Board that several people have stated that there is no need to place a second story facade on the Thrift Shop building. He also informed the Board that the SRA has offered to the Hospital funds to renovate the existing facade. Mr. Luster asked the Board for their opinions as to the design of the facade. Andrea Fish suggested that the building be done in a different shades of red brick, and a new glass door and window be installed. John Emerson suggested that the window be made larger to be used as a display window. There being no further business, Debra Hilbert made a motion to adjourn. Chris Greene seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. • Salem Redevelopment 44-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744 -4580 TO: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD FROM: BILL LUSTER, S.R.A. RE: AGENDA ITEMS FOR MARCH 12, 1986 MEETING DATE: MARCH 5, 1986 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- PEABODY MUSEUM Fisk Crowell and Emily Kuo, of Kallman, McKinnell & Wood Architects will appear before the board to discuss the issue of the south facade of the proposed China Trade Wing at the museum. The architects have submitted photographs which illustrate the desired effect of the recessed brick panels. The architects will also present a landscaping plan to the board. • FIREHOUSE COFFEE SHOP GREENHOUSE ADDITION Mickey Mirra, owner of the Firehouse Coffee Shop located at 30 Church Street will present to the board plans for a greenhouse addition to the existing building. The addition is proposed on the site of the existing sidewalk cafe. HERITAGE COOPERATIVE BANK Peter Copelas, representing the Heritage Cooperative Bank and Rene Lamarre, contractor, will. appear before the board to discuss a previously approved sign permit for Household Finance Corporation. The permit for the Household Finance sign was approved contingent upon the removalof the green panels which exist at the building. Mr. Copelas has suggested that the bank cannot remove the panels at this time. Mr. Copelas and Mr. Lamarre would also like approvalto brick the 3 ' gap which currently exists between the Heritage Co-op Building and the Kinsman Block. NORTH SHORE CHILDREN 'S HOSPITAL THRIFT SHOP Garry Canner, architect for Connemara Realty Trust, will present plans for the restoration of the Thrift Shop building located at 2 Lynde Street. This plan is different from what was previously presented to the board. Originally, plans called for the construction of a false facade at the second floor level. The current plan is for the renovation of the existing building with no additional. construction. Page 2 — 7-11 CORNER OF CONGRESS AND DERBY STREET Representatives from the Southland Corp. will be presenting plans to the board for the development of a 7-11 store at Congress and Derby Streets. The building is a single—story brick structure proposed for the former site of the Richdale variety store. • y �v n����� . s • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD SUMMARY March 12, 1986 7-11 Convenience Store Chris D'Liberti, a representative for the Southland Corporation, appeared before the Board with design plans for a 7-11 convenience mart on the coiner of Derby and Congress Streets. After reviewing the plans, the Board felt that the building does not conform to the guidelines of Heritage Plaza East. The Board suggested that Mr. D'Liberti be given a copy of the design criteria -for Heritage Plaza East and make design changes accordingly. DRB ACTION: No action taken. - - Firehouse Coffee Shop David Jaquith and Michael Mirra presented the proposal for a greenhouse addition to Mr. Mirra' s business. The Board felt that this concept was doable and that the design problems can be solved. The Board suggested that there be very little clapboard used on . • the addition and perhaps garage style type doors be used similar to the ones at Quincy Market. DRB ACTION: More Information Required Before Final Design Approval. Heritage Cooperative Bank Mr. Peter Copelas of the Heritage Cooperative Bank appeared before the Board to obtain permission to waive a previous condition of an SRA approval regarding the relocation of the Household Finance sign at 75 Washington St . They also presented plans to the Board to "ill a 4 foot gap which existed between the Kinsman Block and the Heritage Cooperative Bank, and to extend the brick wall . The Board felt that there should be an 18" setback in, the fill. DRB ACTION : Recommended approval of the sign as amended. Recommended approval to fill the gap between buildings. Peabody Museum Addition Fisk Crowell and Emily Kuo appeared before the Board with final landscaping designs and illustrations of the elevation of the south facade. The Board gave their approval to the landscaping designs but felt that there should be a change in the design of the rear wall. JSDRB ACTION: No Action Taken. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD FEBRUARY 20, 1986 AGENDA I . Roll Call John Emerson . Andrea Fish Debra Hilbert Chris Greene . Anne Farnham Michael Lally Frederick Johnson 2. Items . 1. Sign Permit : 6 Lynde St. Law Office 2. Sign Permit: Shakespear' s (formerly As You Like It) 3 . Sign Permit: Essex Office Supply - • rhe Salem ME • e devellopment 00 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE pati-a5a0 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD February 20, 1986 SUMMARY SIGN PERMIT: Essex Office Supply — Mr. Joseph Gajewski of Essex Office Supply presented a proposed sign to the Design Review Board for their downtown location (Kinsman Building) scheduled to open in March. The sign is 12" x 12' and is comprised of cast aluminum letters bolted to the sign band of the former location of the Walter Conway Insurance office. The Board offered the suggestions of filling the existing holes in the sign band, cleaning the sign band, and centering the sign on the store frontage. DRB ACTION: Recommended approval of sign as amended. SIGN PERMIT: Shakespeare' s — Mr. Edward Hogan of Dovetail Signs presented a proposed sign for Shakespeare' s restaurant (formerly As You Like It). The sign is 2' x 12' , wood carved, and will be maroon with gold lettering. The Board suggested to Mr. Hogan that. the sign was difficult to read, and he should change his lettertype. Mr. Hogan agreed and decided to use a more traditional "Goudy" lettering method. DRB ACTION: Recommended approval as amended. SIGN PERMIT: 6 Lynde Street — Mr. Jon Skerry presented to the Board a 30" x 3611, cast bronze, sign. The sign will be installed to the left of the front door of the building and will contain nameplates for up to 11 attorneys. The sign will be bolted into the existing brick. DRB ACTION: Recommended approval as submitted. Design Review Board February 5, ., 986 Agenda ` 1. Roll Call John Emerson Andrea Fish Debra Hilbert Chris Greene Anne Farnham Michael Lally • Frederick Johnson 2. Approve minutes of D.R.B. meeting held on December 12. 3. Items 1. 235 Bridge Street/Annie Harris 2. Peabody Museum. Wing 3. Sign Permit: Shakespear' s (formerly As You Like It) Design Review Board Minutes February .5, 1986 The Design Review Board met at 9:00 a.m. on February 5 in the Phillips Library of the Peabody Museum. Those in attendance were: Andrea Fish, Debra Hilbert, Frederick Johnson, Michael Lally and Chris Greene. The first order of business was to discuss the minutes of the December 12 meeting. Andrea Fish requested that the minutes be amended to say that the little leaf linden to be planted near the doorway would be in the sidewalk, not in a planter. Ms. Fish motioned to approve the minutes as amended. Michael Lally seconded the motion. Motion so carried. 235 Bridge Street Annie Harris and Robin Wunderlich came before the board with revised plans for the condominium project at the corner of Bridge and Washington Streets. The number of units has been reduced from 19 to 16. The site • plan appeared much the same except for added landscaping(the types of shrubs being the same as the previous ones) . There will be fewer parking spaces because of the decreased number of units. Ms. Harris explained changes in the exterior of the building to members. The end walls will be brick with false chimneys. There will. be windows in these walls as well. The edges of the end walls have been lowered. Ms. Harris stated that she was trying to reflect the end walls of Phases I and II of the condominium project with her design. Ms. Harris also informed' the board that the entry way has been changed. The front entry will be located in the center of the building, off of the parking Lot. There will be a brick portico that extends out in front of the entry. Fred Johnson asked if the arch would be brick. Ms. Harris informed him that it would be made of wood clapboard with wood trim. Debra Hilbert asked what color the aluminum windows would be. Ms. Harris informed members that they would be white with wooden trim. Ms. Harris showed members drawings of the back entry way Iwhich is similar to the front entry but with a smaller arch. Andrea Fish asked if the arch was freestanding. Ms. Harris explained • that the arch is a continuation of the roof. Debra Hilbert asked Robin Wunderlich to explain the back arch. Mr. Wunderlich showed members how the arch is located in the same- plane as the front arch. i Salem Redevelopment uthority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744-4580 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD SUMMARY February — 1986 235 Bridge Street Annie Harris and Robin Wunderlich of the Federal Street Developemnt Team presented their proposal to the Design Review Board for final approval. Ms. Harris outlined the changes which occurred in the project as a result of the Planning Board approval. The Design Review Board reacted favorably to the project (as presented to the SRA on January 27) and voted unanimously for approval as presented. DRB ACTION: Final Approval Granted. • Peabody Museum Fisk Crowell and Emily Cuo presented the proposal (as presented to the SRA on January 27) for the China Trade Wing at the Peabody Museum to the Design Review Board. Following extensive discussion, the Design Review Board raised two concerns which must be addressed before final approval is granted. They are the design of the south facade and the landscaping plan for the entire project. DRB ACTION: More Information Required Before Final Design Approval. • • Chris Greene stated that he liked the design and believed that it fit in well with the architecture of Salem. He did have one suggestion though. Mr. Greene feels that there is too much glass in the front entry arch, making the building look too commercial. He suggested not having the glass panels extend down to the floor. The developer agreed and would make provisions for such change. Fred Johnson asked if Ms. Harris had any more specifics on the windows. Ms. Harris told the board that the windows would be the same as those in Phases I and II. Mr. Johnson also asked where the air conditioners would be located. Ms. Harris informed him that they would be located on the roof. Mr. Johnson was very pleased with this. Andrea Fish questioned the location of the dumpster. Ms. Harris explained that there would be a fence around the dumpster. Andrea Fish made a motion to approve the design. Debra Hilbert seconded the motion. The board voted unanimous approval with recommendations for reduced glass in the front arch and changes to the back entryway. Peabody Museum The architects representing the Peabody Museum(Kallman, McKinnell and Wood) appeared before the board with plans for the China Trade Wing to be constructed at the museum and also the renovation of the • Crowninshield Room to 2 stories, it is currently one story. The architects told the board that the entire facade would be constructed of brick, the same as that on East India Marine Hall.. The architects also informed board members that museum officials have requested that the addition not have many windows. The reason for this is that windows disrupt museum exhibits. The architects explained that the South elevation (Charter Street) would have recesses to break up the brick pattern. The board members expressed concern with these, fearing that they looked like blocked up windows. The Charter Street side of the building would also have two canopies located over the employee entrance and the service entrance. These canopies will be constructed of glass and steel. The architects told members that there would be ivy planted along the side of the building facing Police Station. There is great potential for growth of this type of plant along this side of the building. - Following the architects discussion, board members raised some questions: Chris Greene expressed concern with the cornice line of the wall facing • the garden. The architects explained that there would be an upper gallery that would house a silver exhibit. This gallery would have 3 individual skylights and cupolas. On the ground level there would be a moongate that has large french doors behind it. • Debra Hilbert raised a concern with regard to the south facade and the recesses. Ms. Hilbert thought that the recesses looked like blocked windows. The architects explained that these recesses are very subtle and have curved brick around the bottom. Such recesses have been utilized in other structures, and the architects suggested coming back to the board with photographs to illustrate them. Andrea Fish asked the architects why there was such a small. indent. The architects responded that they found this to be a very effective size and that the shadow that is created is quite effective. Chris Greene commented that the recess should be as deep as possible. The architects once again commented that 1" would be sufficient and that anything larger would not be possible due to the construction of the building. ' Chris Greene also commented regarding the canopies in the back of the building, fearing that they make the building too industrial looking. Chris Greene made a motion to approve allfacades with the exception of the south facade (Charter Street) . The architects have been requested to provide additional information regarding such facade before final. _ approval takes place. The Landscaping plan and rear entrance doors are also still subject to approval.. Andrea Fish seconded the motion. . Motion so carried. Shakespear' s Sign Permit— Bill Luster presented board members with a design for a sign to be located at the former As You Like It location. The sign would have clipped corners, Old English lettering with close spacing and have gold lettering. Board membersraisedconcerns with the clipped corners, the lettering, the color, and the spacing between letters. Fred Johnson suggested that the sign should be similar to the As You Like It sign and that the Old English lettering should be replaced. Mr. Luster will make these concerns known to the owners of Shakespear' s and the matter will be addressed at the next meeting. Fred Johnson made a motion to adjourn the meeting at 11 :30A.M. Andrea , Fish seconded this motion. Motion so carried. i h�v ��tes Design Review Board • Minutes December 12, 1985 The Design Review Board met at 9:00a.m. on December 12 in the 2nd floor conference room at One Salem Green. Those in attendance were: Andrea Fish, Debra Hilbert, and Frederick Johnson. The first order of business was to discuss the minutes of the November 20 meeting. Andrea Fish made a motion to approve the minutes. Debra Hilbert seconded this motion. Motion so carried. 248 Essex Street/101 -Business Services Mr. Rick Coppola appeared before the board with a design for a 2—sided wooden sign to be located at 248 Essex Street. The sign is to have a white background with blue lettering. The sign will be lit by floodlights. Board members requested that Mr. Coppola submit a more detailed drawing of the sign, to appropriate staff and suggested approval upon reviewing such illustration. • 6 Lynde Street Mr. Gary Canner appeared before the board with landscape and base color design plans for 6 Lynde Street. Mr. Canner informed board members that he had chosen 3 species for planting. Mr. Canner also showed members paint samples for the paint on the base around the building. Andrea Fish suggested that there be more planting on the parking lot edge to screen the entranceway. Ms. Fish also stated that she did not think that the planter near the door is necessary. Ms. Fish recommended substituting a planter near the parking lot for the doorway one. Ms. Fish suggested that a little leaf linden be planted that would match the existing lindens. Fred Johnson and Andrea Fish agreed that the color choices for the brick and paint were fine. Andrea Fish made a motion to approve the colors as proposed and to substitute a little leaf linden in place of the entry planting. Debra Hilbert seconded this motion. Motion so carried. 235 Bridge Street Annie Harris and Robin Wunderlich appeared before the board with revised plans of the condominium project to be located at the corner of Bridge • and Washington Streets. - Page 2 - • Ms. Harris addressed the issues that the board questioned at the last meeting: 1 .Pedestrian Access- Ms. Harris told members that she had met with Captain Turner. He said that he would like to see a paved fire lane and that it would not be desireable to have people walking across that entranceway. 2.Grade Changes underneath the building- Ms. Harris showed members a drawing indicating that the shortest point had a clearance of 9 '6". 3.Expanded landscape plan- Ms. Harris informed board members that the heavy planting on Bridge Street will remain green. Ms. Harris also proposed plantings along the property line between 235 Bridge Street and the exisiting condominiums parking lot. Ms. Harris stressed that it is important to have a lot of landscaping because of the many parking spaces. - . Andrea Fish asked what the ground cover beneath the shrubs would be. Mr. Wunderlich explained that there would be a green ground cover, not bark mulch. Mr. Wunderlich also told members that there would be creepers over the fence. 4..Fence Details- Ms. Harris informed members that there would be a cap picket wooden fence, 3' ft. high. Fred Johnson asked if the fence would be painted. Mr. Wunderlich told the board that the fence would be stained. The color will be determined at a future date. Andrea Fish questioned the purpose of the fence. , Ms. Harris stated that the purpose of the fence is to define the edge of the development. Ms. Fish asked if it would be possible to drop the fence back a Little from the sidewalk and have greenery between the fence and the sidewalk. Ms. Harris explained that this creates a problem with maintaining greenery on the other side of the fence. Fred Johnson stated that he had a problem with where the fence ends at corner of Bridge & Washington • Street. Ms. Harris agreed with this and said that they will try to curve the fence at the end so that the back of the fence can not be seen. — Page 3 — 5.Detailed Entrance & Lobby Plan— Mr. Wunderlich told members that there would be steel construction with brick on top at the entryway. A motion was made by Fred Johnson to approve the: 1 .Site Plan 2.Parking Plan 3 .Landscaping Plan 4.Building Design This motion was seconded by Andrea Fish. Approval conditional upon the following: 1 .More fence details. 2.More entryway details. A motion was made by Debbie Hilbert and seconded by Fred Johnson to adjourn the meeting at 10:30 a.m. Motion so carried. • Design Review Board December 12 , 1985 Agenda 1 . Roll Call John Emerson Andrea Fish Debra Hilbert Chris Greene ` Anne Farnham Michael Lally Frederick Johnson a 2 . Approve minutes. of D . R .B . meeting held on November 20 . 3 . Items 1 . 235 Bridge St . /Final Design Review • 2 . 205 Bridge St'. /Final Design Review 3 . 6 Lynde St . /Landscape and base color design review . 4 . Sign Review: 248 Essex St . / 101 Business Services i DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Minutes November 20, 1985 The Design Review Board met at the 2nd floor Conference Room, One Salem Green at 9:00 a.m. on November 20. Those in attendance were: Michael Lally, Chris Greene, Anne Farnham, Debra Hilbert, Andrea Fish, and Frederick Johnson. The first order of business was to review the minutes of the October 30 meeting. On a motion by Debbie Hilbert, and a second by Andrea Fish, the board voted to approvethe minutes. THE SENIOR ADVANTAGE—SIGN PERMIT., Jane Glasier of The Senior Advantage, located on Front Street, presented to the board a design for two signs to be located on the building. One sign will be. located on the front of the building and will be two—sided and hang on a bracket. The sign on the back of the building will be wall mounted. Ms. Glasier showed color samples of the signs to the board members. The signs will be wooden and will have a green background with gold leaf lettering. Andrea Fish made a motion to approve the design. This motion was seconded by Anne Farnham. Motion so carried. 235 Bridge Street Annie Harris and Robin Wunderlich appeared before the board with revised drawings of Phase III of the condominium project at the corner of Bridge and Washington Street. Ms. Harris explained the grade change on the Bridge Street side of the building. Ms. Harris is proposing landscaping that will hide the underside of the building from passersby. This landscaping will also deemphasize parking in the area beneath the building and encourage use of this area as a courtyard. Ms. Harris explained to board members that she is still working on a main entranceway. Ms. Harris also went on to explain the landscaping plans. She is proposing shrubbery to match exisiting shrubbery on the existing walkway that leads to Phases I and II of the condominium project. Ms. Harris also told the board that she had met with the Fire Chief to discuss the emergency fire entrance and that the proposed emergency access from Bridge Street was acceptable. This would allow the fire apparatus to avoid driving beneath the building. • Chris Greene questioned Ms. Harris about the paving of the fire access. Mr. Greene stated that if the paving is the same as the parking area, people will park on the access thinking it is for parking. Mr. Greene suggested that the access be a gravel road bed with grassy cover. This would have to be discussed with the Fire Chief before this could be done however. Mr. Greene also suggested that there be a pedestrian entrance where the fire access is for the people who will be going over to the new train station. Mr. Greene asked Ms. Harris to once again explain the topography of the site: Mr. Greene calculated the slope percentage to be 4% which does not create any problems for vehicles going beneath the building. Mr. Greene expressed concern over the parking .spaces located beneath the building, fearing that there is not enough room for vehicles to maneuver. The discussion returned to the landscaping plans. Ms. Harris explained to. board members that a hearty species was needed on the Bridge Street side because of the wind coming off the water. Mr. Greene requested that there be depth in the planting, not just a row of bushes.. He suggested that larch trees or northern red oaks would be i good hardwood specimens. Questions were also raised about the z—shaped piers beneath the building on the Bridge Street entrance. Mr. Greene expressed a concern that cars may hit these when coming out of the parking spaces. Mr. Johnson expressed a similar concern. Ms. Harris and Mr. Wunderlich suggested _ changing these piers to t—shaped. This was acceptable to both Mr. Greene and Mr. Johnson. I^ • Ms. Harris will appear before the board at the next meeting, at which time the following areas will be addressed: 1 .Pedestrian access. 2.Grade changes. ' 3 .Access through Phase II. 4.Exp'anded landscaping plan for Bridge Street side. 5.Longer parking spaces for Bridge Street side. 6.Fence details. '7.Detailed entranceway plan. 10 Crombie Street Mr. David Jaquith appeared before the board with plans for a 2 unit residential conodminium development. Mr. Jaquith explained to the board that. the design had been approved by the D.R.B. three years ago. The building will be brick on 3 sides with the south side being clapboard and glass. There will be 4 parking spaces, two for each unit. A fence 5 ft. high will be constructed on the parking lot side. An easement has been provided for the neighboring house to park three cars. Mr. Jaquith told members that he would bring in further landscaping details at the next meeting. • Board members raised some concerns after Mr. Jaquith' s discussion: Debra Hilbert questioned the need- for the lintel over the parking area. I i Andrea Fish stated that she did not see that the lintel would create much privacy. It was suggested that a fence would help to make the ® entranceway less arbitrary. Changes were made in the fence design which enhanced the lintel design. Andrea Fish and Chris Greene suggested that a wrought iron gate in the entrance to the property would help to create some privacy and keep the building from looking like a hotel. Board members suggested to Mr. Jaquith that the fence in the back of the property be lower at one end. For the next meeting Mr. Jaquith will address the following items: 1 .Landscaping Plan—replace or add trees. Mr. Greene requested that there be at least one nice specimen tree. 2.Fen6e Details—explain the lowering of each end. 3.Brick walkway. 4.Wrought iron doorway. . 205 Bridge Street/Salem Housing Authority Mr. Bill Feldkamp of the Architects Collaborative and Ms. Eileen Saco of the Housing Authority came before the board with additional plans for the elderly 'housing project to be located adjacent to Morency Manor on Bridge Street. Mr. Feldkamp explained to board members that the planting area had been increased. Mr. Feldkamp also told members that the building had been pushed back 8-9 ft and that the elevator had been moved so that the windows in the tower could be centered. When questioned about the colors of the building , Mr. Feldkamp said that it was too early to say but he would like the colors to match those of Morency Manor.., Mr. Feldkamp asked for the boards support of balconies for each unit. Mr. Feldkamp explained that it would be difficult to get EOCD to go along with this idea because of the additional expense, but they would be a nice addition to the building. Mr. Feldkamp also told members that he would like to have the landscaping for thisprojectcorrespond with those of Annie Harris' project. Andrea Fish made a motion to approve the placement of this building(with the balconies) on the site, contingent upon the heavy planting of street trees on the line of Bridge Street as proposed in drawings. The specific design of the building would be addressed at a later meeting. This motion was seconded by Debra Hilbert, motion so carried. 6 Lynde Street - Mr. Gary Conner appeared before the -board to discuss the entryway and the landscaping of 6 Lynde Street. Mr. Conner showed board members the design of the doorway. There would be a glass commercial door with a handle that was typical of the buildings era. The color would be the same as the frame(bronze tone). Debra Hilbert questioned Mr. Conner about the door being off—centered. Fred Johnson also stated that the door appears oversized, making the ® opening of the doorway appear even smaller. Mr. Conner told members that he is locked into these existing conditions and that the brick can not be cut down. Board members expressed concerns with the window bases. The design had been previously approved, contingent upon certain corrections which have not been undertaken as yet. Also, the doorway has already been bricked in. Board members were upset that. Mr. Conner had disregarded the Board' s earlier decision. Mr. Conner told members that he would investigate doing something to narrow the stiles of the door. Debra Hilbert made a motion to approve the door with an option for Mr. Conner to investigate a narrower style. I[ should be noted that the board did not approve the design of the doorway, hocbever, work on such doorway had been completed proiorto the D.R.B. meeting. Andrea Fish seconded this motion, motion so carried. Board members next brought up the landscaping details. Approval was i contingent upon landscaping, but as yet no lanscaping has appeared. Mr. Conner told members that he would bring their concerns to Jon Skerry, a principal in 6 Lynde Street. Members suggested low screening in the parking area with locus, rhododendron, and vews. Andrea Fish expressed concern that plants would die from the heat in the parking area. Mr. Conner explained that raised planter beds would be used which would allow, the plants to survive in the heat of the summer. Mr. Conner will appear at the next meeting to present landscape plans. ,A motion was made by Andrea Fish and seconded by Debra Hilbert to adjourn the meeting. All were in favor. Motion so carried. The meeting was adjourned at 11 :30 A.M. I DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Summary December 12, 1985 248 Essex Street/101 Business Services Mr. Rick Coppola appeared before the board with a design for a 2 faced wooden sign to be supported by angled iron supports. The sign will be 4' x 3' and have Helvetica Bold lettering. DRB ACTION: Recommended approval of the design as presented. 6 Lynde Street Mr. Gary Canner presented landscape and base color design information to the board. Board members suggested that the planting to be located near the entranceway be substituted for a large tree at the edge of the parking area. DRB ACTION: Recommended approval of the colors of the base of the building as proposed and the substitution of a little leaf linden in place of the entryway planting. • 235 BRIDGE STREET Annie Harris appeared before the board with revised plans. Ms. Harris addressed all of the areas that the board had brought up at the last meeting. Further entryway plans will be discussed at a later meeting. The details of the fence at the corner of Bridge and Washington Street will also be addressed. DRB ACTION: Recommended approval of: 1 .Site Plan 2.Parking Plan 3.Landscaping Plan 4.Building Design Approval conditional upon further fence details and entryway details. • 1 Design Review Board November 20,1985 Agenda 1 . Roll Call John Emerson Andrea Fish Debra Hilbert Chris Greene Anne Farnham Michael Lally Frederick Johnson 2. Approve minutes of D.R.B. meeting held on October 30. 3. Items 1. 205 Bridge St./Salem, Housing Authority 2. 235 Bridge St. /Annie Harris 3. 10 Crombie St./David Jaquith 4. 6 Lynde St./Gary Conner 5. Sign Permit: Senior Advantage ai DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Summary • November 20, 1985 THE SENIOR ADVANTAGE—SIGN PERMIT Jane Glasier of the Senior Advantage, located on Front Street, presented to the board a design for two signs to be located on the building. The sign on the front of the building will be two—sided and hang on a bracket. The sign on the back of the building will be wall mounted. The signs will be wooden and will have a green background with gold leaf lettering. DRB ACTION: Recommended approval of the design as presented. • 235 BRIDGE STREET Annie Harris and Robin Wunderlich appeared before the board with revised drawings of their condominium project at the corner of Bridge and Washington Streets. • Board members expressed concern over the z—shaped piers beneath the building on the Bridge Street entrance. Ms. Harris and Mr. Wunderlich agreed that t—shaped piers would enable vehicles to maneuver much more easily. The Board would like Ms. Harris to address the following areas for the next meeting: 1 .Pedestrian access. 2.Grade changes. 3 .Access through Phase TI. • 4.Expanded landscaping plan for Bridge Sbreet side. 5.Longer parking spaces for Bridge Street side. 6.Fence details. 7 .Detailed entranceway plan. DRB ACTION: No action taken. 10 CROMBIE STREET David Jaquith presented to the board plans for a 2 unit residential condominium development. Board members suggested to Mr. Jaquith that the fence at the back of the property be lower at one end. Board memberes also suggested that a wrought iron gate in the entrance to the property would help to create privacy. Mr. Jaquith will appear at a future meeting and address the following areas: l .Landscaping Plan 2.Fence Details 3 .Brick walkway 4.Wrought iron doorway • DRB ACTION: Recommended approval of the project conditional upon Mr. Jaquith submitting the details as outlined. 205 BRIDGE STREET/SALEM HOUSING AUTHORITY Mr. Bill Feldkamp came before the board with additional plans for the elderly housing project to be located adjacent to Morency Manor on Bridge Street. Mr. Feldkamp told members that the planting area had been increased, the building had been pushed back 8-9ft and that the elevator had been moved so that the windows in the tower could be centered. Mr. Feldkamp asked for the boards support of balconies for each unit. Mr. Feldkamp explained that it would be difficult to get EOCD to go along with this idea because of the additional expense, but they would be a nice addition to the building. • DRB ACTION: Recommended approval of the placement of the building(with the balconies) on the site, however, the design of the building was not sufficiently complete and could not be addressed at this time. • 6 LYNDE STREET Mr. Gary Conner appeared before the board to discuss the entryway and landscaping plans. Mr. Conner told the board that there would be a glass commercial door with a handle that was typical of that buildings era. Board memberes felt that the door appeared oversized. Mr. Conner told members that he • is locked into exisiting conditions and that the brick can not be cut down. Approval of the design was contingent upon landscaping details, but as yet no landscaping has appeared. Members suggested low screening in the parking area with locus, rhododendron, and yews. Mr. Conner will appear at the next meeting with detailed landscaping plans. DRB ACTION: Recommended approval of the door with an option for Mr. Conner to investigate a narrower syle. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Minutes October 30, 1985 The Design.ieview Board met at the 2nd floor Conference Room, One Salem Green- tit 9:00a.m. on October 30. Those in attendance were: Bill Luster, Andrea Fish, Debbie Hilbert, Frederick Johnson, and Anne Farnham. The first order of business was to discuss the minutes of the October 8 and October 15 meetings. On a motion by Andrea Fish, and a second by Fred Johnson, the board voted to approve the minutes as so changed. CHINA CLIPPER—SIGN PERMIT Mr. Paul Fennel of Salem Sign presented a proposal for two internally illuminated signs to be placed on the former Beef and Oyster building. The proposed signs would be 2 ft x 16 ft with a light blue field and white lettering. Upon review of the design by board members many questions were raised. Debbie Hilbert questioned Mr. Fennel about the possibility of a wooden sign. Mr. Fennel responded that visibility would not be as great with a wooden sign and that the internally illuminated signs were allowed in the sign ordinance. Ms.Hilbert expressed concern over the money ,and • time that have gone into restoring this building and that the image of the building may be altered with a lighted sign. Andrea Fish also expressed concern over a lighted sign. Bill Luster added that even though internally lighted signs are allowed, they must be compatible with the architecture of the building. Fred Johnson asked if Mr. Fennel had color samples for the sign. Members expressed concern that the blue would show through the white letters. Members were reassured by Fennel that this would not occur. ,. The white is not a cut surface, but is similar to the sign at Video .. Voyage. Andrea Fish also expressed concern over the color choice, feeling that the color does not fit in with the building color. Mr. Fennel then asked Mr. Wong, the owner of the China Clipper, if an alternative color would be considered for the sign. After explaining to the board that the blue of the sign matches the interior of the restaurant (rugs, linens, menus, etc. . ) , Mr. Wong agreed to another color which would be more compatible with the buildings exterior. The board members suggested using a field of red oxide with oyster white lettering. This was acceptable. Another point of concern raised by the members was over the width of the / backlitsign. -Andrea Fish suggested that the w44t-k be reduced to 6 v inches. � V WTI- Fred Johnson told the board members that he liked the idea of a lighted • sign and that it would bring life to the building. Mr. Johnson felt that the soft white lettering as opposed to white lettering would make the sign more tolerable in the daylight. Mr.Johnson also asked a question about the border. Mr. Fennel informed the board members that • this was an authentic Chinese border and that it would be higlighted by a dark line in order to make it more visible. A final issue addressed by the board was the location of the sign on the Washirgton ;�treet side of the building. Andrea Fish made the suggestion that 09'e sign be centered above the door. Mr. Fennel agreed with this suggestion. On a motion by Anne Farham, and a second by Andrea Fish, the board voted approval conditional upon the 4 points below: 1. Shaping of the Sign—clipped corners as opposed to square. 2. Relocation of sign—to be centered over the door. 3. Depth of Sign—bring it down to 6 inches. 4. Color of Sign—will be changed to a field of red oxide with oyster white lettering and frame. 235 BRIDGE STREET— Annie Harris and Robin Wunderlich appeared before the board with a design for Phase III of the condominium project at the corner of Bridge and Washington Street. The lot is an L—shaped one with two major problems: 1.An easement across the lot which can not be removed and 2. A tight dimension in the center of the lot. • Ms. Harris is proposing 19 units on four levels. . The breakdown of the floor will be four units on the first floor, and five on each of the others. Each unit will have two bedrooms and two bathrooms and a small balcony. Ms. Harris explained to the board members that flat units have a greater marketability than townhouse units. The exterior of the building will be gray claboard and brick, much like the adjacent units. There will be a drive thru, made of concrete and brick, which will serve as a visitor parking area. Another problem brought up by Fred Johnson was that of no separate entranceways. Ms. Harris again explained that market studies have shown that flat units are more marketable than townhouse units.. Ms. Harris told the board members that she would like to install a fence around the .Washington/Bridge Street corner in order to define that corner. There would also be extensive landscaping in this area. There will also be landscaping around the building which goes up to the building itself. Members next asked Ms. Harris what the height of the building was compared to the existing buildings. The grading is still being checked, but at this time it is believed that the proposed building will be about 3-4 feet higher than the exisiting one. Ms. Harris also explained to board members that there will be three • non—chimneys on the roof which will be present for symmetry purposes. There were no objections by board members to this point. • Andrea Fish questioned Mr.Wunderlich about the windows on the brick end walls. He explained that there would be fire grates on these windows which are technically required to be there. These will give definition to the wall. on the Federal Street side. A plus to these will be that neighbors iii the adjacent buildings will not have windows looking right at theft. Bill Luster provided Ms.Harris and Mr.Wunderlich with a list of what is needed for the next meeting prior to a recommendation: 1 . Landscaping plan 2. North and South elevations 3. More defined version of Bridge Street Elevation 4. Door—way question, would like further detailing of the entranceways. Ms. Harris will appear before the board, with the 4 items listed above, at the next .meeting which is scheduled for November 13, 1985. 205 Bridge Street/Salem Housing Authority— Elayne Hart, Salem Housing Director and Bill Feldcamp, an architect from the Architects Collaborative, presented the board with drawings for an elderly housing project to be located adjacent to Morency Manor.,_ The proposed site will have 35 units and will be three stories high. • There are plans to add 12 parking spaces that open onto Ash Street. Included in the plans are fencing and trees along the street edge to define the street edge. Fencing is also proposed to protect the new building from the Telephone Company parking lot. Trees will also be placed close to the building. The exterior of the building will be stained wood claboard, the color of which has yet to be determined. Mr. Feldkamp told board members that there are small balconies proposed for the East, South and West sides. ` These balconies have yet to be approved by E.O.C.D. though. Mr. Feldkamp also told members that there is a proposed lawn area on the South Side for the residents use which will encourage intermingling with residents of Morency Manor. Upon hearing Mr. Feldkamp' s presentation, board members raised some questions. Fred Johnson stated that the building will look small next to the church and Parker Brothers. Mr. Johnson also wanted to know why the building was only 3 stories. Mr. Feldkamp informed the board that EOCD would only fund 3 stories. Bill Luster asked if the building could be moved closer to the street. Mr. Feldkamp explained that if the building were moved, existing parking • spaces would be lost and new parking spaces .would have to be moved to the rear of the building. EOCD also turned down a proposal to situate the building closer to the 'street. They cited traffic noise as the reason. r Bill Luster also asked what the colors of the building would be. Mr. Feldkamp told the members that one option is to have a rose color with white trim. Board members expressed an interest that the building be painted a color to match Morency Manor. Mr. Fedkamp' and Ms. Hart will appear before the board at the next meeting. At this time they will have the following items: 1 . Redesign of planning and parking in front. 2. North and South elevations. 3. Porch Plans 4. Final Plan 5. Landscaping Detail 6. How Morency Manor. and this project will tie together and look together. A motion was made by Debbie Hilbert and seconded by Fred Johnson to adjourn the meeting. All were in favor, motion so carried. The meeting was adjourned at 10:40 A.M. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD • Summary October 30, 1985 CHINA CLIPPER-SIGN PERMIT Mr. Paul Fennel of Salem Sign Company appeared before the board with a design for two signs to be located on the former Beef and Oyster building. The signs would be 2ft x 16ft and internally illuminated with a red oxide field and white lettering. Board members raised some concerns which Mr. Fennel agreed to address. They are as follows: 1 .Shaping of the sign-clipped corners as opposed to square 2.Relocation of sign-to be centered over the door • 3 .Depth of Sign-bring it down to 6 inches 4.Color of sign-will be changed to a field of red oxide with oyster white lettering and frame DRB ACTION: Recommended approval of the design conditional upon the , above points. • • DRB October 30, 1985 China Clipper Sign (2 signs) Same location as existing signs • 2'x16' internally lit Brick Red field off white letters Action: Recommended Approval DRB November 20, 1985 The Senior Advantage (front and rear signs) Wood Carved Cold leaf lettering ' Forest green field Action: Recommended Approval 235 Bridge St. — Review and comment. Action: No action at this time 10 Crombie St. 2 unit res. condos Extensive review and comment .Action: Recommended approval conditional upon submittal of: landscape plan • fence details walkway plans entrance gate plans 205 Bridge Street 35 unit elderly complex Action: Approved location of building, however, much more detailed plans were requested. 6 Lynde Street Approved front door design DRB December 12, 1985 101 Business Services - 4'x3' projecting sign , White field Blue lettering Action: ' DRB recommended approval 6 Lynde Street Approval of base color paint - Approval of landscaping details • 235 Bridge Street — Annie Harris will present at next meeting i I� DESIGN REVIEW BOARD . October 15, 1985 Summary — A special meeting of the Design Review Board of the Salem Redevelopment Authority was held on October 15, 1985, at 9:00 a.m. Present were Andrea Fish, Debra Hilbert, and Frederick Johnson. It was voted to unanimously approve the revised design for the office development at 263-265 Essex St. as presented by William Quinn, co—developer, and Robin Wunderlich, architect, with the developer's option of returning with a more elaborate doorway design at a later date. The developers will. also return with a landscaping plan when one has been designed. DRB ACTION: Recommend the design be approved as presented, the landscape design would be presented at a later date. • • I DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Minutes of Meeting October 8, 1985 The Design Review Board met at the 2nd floor Conference Room , One Salem Green at 9:00 A.M. on October 8. Those in attendance were: Bill Luster, Andrea Fish, Debbie Hilbert, Michael Lally, Frederick Johnson, John Emerson, and Anne Farnham. BODY TALK Body Talk Tanning and Clothing Salon appeared before the Board for permission to install a 9 sq.ft. , right—angle sign at its 140 Washington Street location. The Board had reviewed a design previously and requested that the colors of the sign be softened. The recolored graphic was more amenable to the board. Upon a motion by Debbie Hilbert and a second by Andrea Fish, the Board voted to recommend approval of the sign. KINSMAN BLOCK MAHANS Household Finance Corporation requested permission to move their exisiting, internally lit sign from its exisiting location at 75 Washington Street to the site of the former Mahan' s store. Discussion ensued and the board required that the exisitng aluminum canopy be removed and the glasswork be restored to its original condition. Debbie Hilbert made a motion to approve the new loction conditional upon the removal of the aluminum canopy and the restoration of the original glasswork. Andrea Fish seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. 6 LYNDE STREET Jon Skerry made a presentation before the board on the behalf of his development project at 6 Lynde Street. The major point of discussion was over the yellow—glazed bricks on the building which are nonsalvageable. Mr. Skerry proposed that these bricks be removed and a red brick facade be installed. Mr. Skerry also proposed that the bottom bricks which go up to the 1st story window ledges remain and be painted a matching color. The board will determine what color the bottom should be painted upon site inspection of the site. Suggestions for colors are either red or gray at this time. Questions were also raised about the color of the mortar. Mr. Skerry recommended that the mortar be gray. Upon a motion by Debbie Hilbert, the board agreed that the color of the mortar should match that of the . existing mortar in the Odell Block. Another issue which was raised was the design of the second story facade for the Thrift Shop at 2 Lynde Street. The board felt that the design of the facade should be altered as a result of both buildings (2&6 Lynde) being rebricked with red brick. The board expressed an interest in seeing an elevation prepared for the Thrift Shop which did not match the roof line at 6 Lynde exactly but which extended approximately halfway up. The developer agreed to have his architects provide such plan. The board stated that the design did not have to match 6 Lynde St. to be an effective remedy to the varying building heights. A motion was made by Andrea Fish toapprovethe design change from + yellow painted brick to red brick. The motion was seconded by Michael Lally. All were in favor, motion so carried. The Review Board asked for a new design which incorporated the entire facade at the Thrift Shop rather then a section added to the top. ' • FRYE BUILDING — 265 ESSEX STREET Bill Quinn appeared before the DRB to show preliminary designs of his proposed Office Condominium Project to be located in the Frye Building. Mr.Quinn stressed the three major criteria which led to his design: 1.Marketability 2.Financial 3.Design Mr.Quinn showed a slide presentation to the Board members. This presentation outlined the historical significance of the building and allowed members to see what Mr. Quinn is trying to achieve with his restoration. Mr.Quinn pointed out the stucco building, the granite posts on the Essex Street side, and also the store front windows on the Essex Street side. This is what Mr. Quinn would like to do with the facade facing Essex Street. Mr.Quinn then presented the Board with two designs. The first one was a colonial restoration. The second one was a more contemporary design. • Board members discussed extensively both designs. Many questions were raised. Among those concerns were: —The design of the interior building facing the parking lot —The securing of the parking lot —Entrance to the building for pedestrians from parking lot —The board would rather see a more contemporary design facing the parking lot so that it does not appear that a historic building or perhaps even an entire street had once existed where the parking lot is now located. —The Board would like Mr. Quinn to make another attempt at a contemporary design for the building. Board members believe that it is possible for the building to have a historic flavor but with a more contemporary look. Mr. Quinn stressed the importance of the marketability of this section of the project which has the greatest area of room for office occupation. The Board understands these marketability questions and believes that a contemporary design will attract tenants. Mr.Quinn asked if the Board will see him again in one week. At that time Mr. Quinn will have a new design and also landscaping, parking and color plans. The Board agreed to this meeting which is scheduled for Tuesday October 15 at 9:00 A.M. A motion was made by Andrea Fish and seconded by Michael Lally to adjourn the meeting. All were in favor, motion so carried. The meeting was adjourned at 11:30 A.M. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD • - Summary - Household Finance Corp. - 75 Washington St. Household Finance Corp. requested permission to relocate their existing internally lit sign to the site of the former Mahan' s Store. The sign conforms technically to the sign manual and is not being changed in design. The board recommended that the aluminum overhang be removed and the original glaswork be reinstalled. DRB ACTION: Recommended approval of the change of location with the condition that the aluminum canopy be removed and the original glaswork be restored. Body Talk - 140 Washington St . Robin Grant appeared before the board requesting permission to install. a 9 sq. ft. right angle sign at her shop at 140 Washington St. The sign had been presented at a previous date and the DRB recommendations had been incorporated into the new design. DRB ACTION: Recommended approval of the sign as presented. • 6 Lynde St . Jon Skerry presented two issues which have been raised regarding his development at 6 Lynde St. The first issue was regarding the inability to restore the existing yellow bricks. Mr. Skerry proposed removing the outer course of yellow brick and replacing with red brick. The board felt that this was an improvement to the project and should be recommended for approval. The second issue raised was the second story facade at 2 Lynde St. The Design Review Board stressed that the developer should not atttempt to match exactly the existing building at 6 Lynde St. Since the brick on the two buildings would now be the same, the board felt that a design should be drawn which does not reach the existing roof-line but extends approximately halfway up. Several recommendations were made and the designer will. be . providing a new design at a future date. DRB ACTION: Recommended approval of the change from yellow painted brick to red; no action on the 2 Lynde St. facade. • Frye Building • Bil.l. Quinn appeared before the Design Review Board to present final design plans for 265 Essex Street. He described in detailthe history, existing conditions, and future plans of the property. The board expressed a favorable opinion of the restoration of the front and rear buildings at 265 Essex Street. More detail was requested with regard to trim detail and paint colors. The board expressed an interest in seeing a contermporary design rather than an historical reproduction for the middle building. Mr. Quinn stressed the importance of historical design and its effect on marketability of the units. The board understands his concerns regarding the market and feels that a contemporary design which borrows aspects from historic design would be far more appropriate. Mr. Quinn and his architect asked to appear before the DRB in one week with a contemporary design rather than an historic reproduction. DRB ACTION: No recommended action at this time. • • w DESIGN REVIEW BOARD SUMMARY AUGUST 14, 1985 r 1. Bridge St./First Universalist Church --George Belisle presented plans for complete masonry and window repair at the First Universalist Church located at 211 Bridge Street. Construction plans called for the deteriorated wood windows to be replaced with vinyl—clad replacement windows. Board member Debra Hilbert suggested using a woodenreplacement window because of the architectural and historical significance of the building. Mr. Belisle stated he would use wood replacement units. The board agreed to the method of tuck—pointing the building under the condition that Mr. Belisle perform test patches to be approved by appropriate S.R.A. staff before beginning work. ACTION: Board recommended approval of the improvements. 2. Masonic Temple/Sign--Matt Phelan represented the Masonic Temple' s application for a sign permit for the rear of the Masonic Temple building. The sign will be 4' X 8' and will carry 8 business placards. The sign sign will have a maroon background and gray lettering, it will be used by retail businesses which do not currently have street signage. . ACTION: Board recommended approval of sign application. 3. Eatons Block/Video Paradise/Sign -- A representatives from Video Paradise asked the Board for permission to install a temporary sign at their new location in the Eatons Block. The owner stated that the sign would be replaced when the remainder of the building was rented, at which time a total sign package could be presented to the board for approval. ACTION: Board recommended approval of the temporarydepicted sign for a maximum of 90 days., • I DESIGN REVIEW BOARD JULY 10, 1985 AGENDA 1. Roll Call John Emerson Frederick Johnson Christopher M. Greene Andrea Fish Debra Hilbert Anne Farnam Michael Lally 2. Approve minutes of the Design Review Board meeting held on June 12, 1985. 3. Items: a. 30 Federal Street/Atty. Stephen J. Kiely/Sign Works b. 6 Lynde Street/l story addition/Gary Canner, Architect DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MATTERS (From minutes of July 10, 1985 DRB meeting) The following items were reviewed: 30 Federal Street/Atty. Stephen J. Kiely/Sign Works Atty. Stephen J. Kiely described the proposed 48" x 6" x 3/4" sign, which will consist of painted black letters on a white background with black edge border. The sign will be fastened to the brick wall at 30 Federal Street. Mr. Kiely stated he is not committed to the exact placement, but would like the sign at a right angle to the street, as shown in the picture submitted. Andrea Fish inquired if the sign could be put in line with the bottom of the glass bricks, which exist in the wall. Mr. Kiely answered in the affirmative. Mr. Kiely further suggested that the sign could replace an existing sign which the owners of the building would like to remove. DRB recommended approval of the sign, placed to the left of the glass bricks, in line with the bottom of the glass bricks, or if the existing sign is removed from the wall, the new sign may be put in its place. 6 Lynde Street/One Story Additon/Gary Canner, Architect Architect Gary Canner, representing Connemarra Realty Trust, presented the proposed plans concerning the former bus depot at 6 Lynde Street. Mr. Cannerexplained that the developer plans to add one floor, thereby increasing the height of the building 7i' , maintain the existing window openings, and duplicate those window sizes at the upper level. They plan to move the entry, as shown on the plans submitted. Windows will have clear view glass blocks on either side. Gary Canner stated they hope to start construction on August 5, 1985, and anticipate it will take five months to complete the project. The landscaping, door treatment, canopy, and sign will be presented for approval at a future meeting. Bill Luster advised a site visit for the future. DRB recommended approval of the plans presented except for the door treatment, canopy, sign, and plantings, since these items will be presented at a future meeting. • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD JUNE 12, 1985 AGENDA 1. Roll Call John Emerson Frederick Johnson Christopher M. Greene Andrea Fish Debra Hilbert Anne Farnam Michael Lally 2. Approve minutes of the Design Review Board meeting held on April 17, 1985. 3. Items: a. As You Like It b. Market Place Rest Rooms/Demarco/Jarek C. 24 Norman Street/David Jaquith/Front door & awning ` d. Odell Block Restoration/Owners e. Firehouse Coffee Shop/Cafe f. 209 Essex Street/Department of Public Welfare MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD ON JUNE 12, 1985 On Wednesday, June 12, 1985, the members of the Design Review Board met for their regular meeting at One Salem Green, Salem, MA. On roll call, the following members were present: John Emerson, Andrea Fish, and Debra Hilbert. Christopher M. Greene and Anne Farnam were excused. Minutes William Luster called for omissions and/or corrections to the minutes of the DRB meeting held on April 17, 1985. Debra Hilbert stated that on Page 2, Paragraph 2, Line 3, the words "State requirements" should be replaced with "Massachusetts Historical Commission". Andrea Fish motioned to accept the minutes of the meeting of April 17, 1985 with the aforementioned correction. John Emerson seconded the motion, motion so carried. The following items were reviewed: As You Like It/114 East India Mall Joseph Portelance of Portelance Sign Co. , Inc. described the proposed sign for the As You Like It Restaurant, which will be located in the East India Mall with its entrance near the fountain area. The sign will be 2 x 11 , placed on the facade over the walkway, with a continuous spotlight shining on it. The colors are gray Italic lettering on a maroon field. John Emerson stated that the Board could approve the sign and then their electrician could appear before the Board for the lighting approval (since specifications were not submitted) rather than hold up the sign. Debra Hilbert motioned to approve the sign as presented. John Emerson seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Market Place Rest Rooms/Demarco/Jarek Ron Jarek gave Board members a description of how the location for the rest rooms was selected, stating that Location #3 was centrally located and the utility pipes are behind the proposed building. The construction materials will be brick with a metal roof. Mr. Jarek stated all Massachusetts State Handicapped access requirements will be met. The entrance will be ramped, and there will be vandal—proof hardware. Andrea Fish objected to the sign which was placed on the front of the building. John Emerson inquired if there was an international rest room symbol. Andrea Fish stated there is, and described same. John Emerson felt the gable was not necessary for rest rooms — they do not have to be prominent — and in addition, the gable would be an added expense. Mr. Jarek stated they would remove the gable. Andrea Fish made a motion to approve the plans without the gable. Debra Hilbert seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. • • MINUTES OF DRB MEETING OF JUNE 12, 1985 Page 2 Odell Block Restoration/Owners Mr. Neil Shauer, Roger Soderberg, and David Jaquith appeared before the Board for approval of the storefront design and the front windows. Mr. Soderberg stated they have been working with a representative from Massachusetts Historical Commission who has given her approval of the storefront design and window design. Mr. Shauer stated they are trying to come to terms with the owner of the Morning Call Coffee Shop to have him move to another area in the building so they can restore the original entranceway. Mr. Soderberg stated that there is a great deal about the fourth floor that is still being looked at, and asked for an approval of the first three floors to facilitate construction of the storefronts and windows. Debra Hilbert motioned to approve the store fronts and windows as shown on the plans. John Emerson seconded, all were in favor, motion so carried. 24 Norman Street/David Jaquith/Front door & Canopy David Jaquith represented the developers of 24 Norman Street for the purpose of obtaining approval of a door design and canopy over the entrance of the building. The half round canopy would be 10' off the ground and 8' across, the straight side is 3' and it is 4' to the top of the round. The canopy comes 3' out from the building. The proposed door would be a wood, custom, three panel door in natural finish. Discussion followed, and it was decided the color of the canopy should be terra cotta and tan, wide striped, Sunbrella #1207. Debra Hilbert inquired as to the muttons for the windows. Robert Bramble stated they are being fabricated now and will be installed. Andrea Fish motioned to accept the plans for the terra cotta and tan canopy and wood door as presented. Debra Hilbert seconded, all were in favor, motion so carried. 209 Essex Street/Department of Public Welfare John S. Augeri stated the sign will be 18" x 36" (4" taller than the existing sign) . The colors would be white letters on a bright blue field with a logo, in shades of blue, on the left side of the sign. The sign would be constructed of aluminum, and the surface colors would be flat and nonreflective. The sign would be flat against the building, extending 5/811. Discussion followed and another color, green, was suggested. Mr. Augeri stated the colors may be standard, as he thought the organization planned to use the same colors on all their signs throughout the State. Mr. Augeri informed Board members that he would inquire if the colors could be changed to the white and shades of green combination, to be approved by DRB members. • Andrea Fish motioned to approve the sign — size, shape, and content; with final colors to be agreed upon at a later date. Debra Hilbert seconded, all were in favor, motion so carried. I MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING ON JUNE 12, 1985 Page 3 Mr. Augeri notified Bill Luster on June 13, 1985 that the white and shades of blue colors were standard with his Department and could not be changed. In view of the aforementioned DRB members agreed to approve the white g pp to and shades of blue colors Mr. Augeri presented at the June 12, 1985 meeting of the DRB. Firehouse Coffee Shop/Cafe Bill Luster described the plans for the construction of a sidewalk cafe on the City owned land to the right of the Firehouse Coffee Shop. Mr Luster stated Mr. Mirra' s plans show he plans to retain the large tree near Church Street, remove the plantings, replace them with a brick surface, on which will be placed 4 or 5 tables and chairs (to be taken in at night) . Discussion followed and John Emerson inquired if there was to be a curb cut for access in the center of the edge of the patio. Mr. Luster answered that it could be added. Andrea Fish stated that if the area was filled in in brick, it might be too much brick in that area. John Emerson stated that cut sandstone might be a better contrast to all the brick in the area. He suggested a terra cotta or similar color. • Debra Hilbert motioned to approve the use of the space for a Cafe, and approve removal of plantings with the exception of the large tree, and that there will be a cut in the curb on the parking lot side, and that an alternative paver, such as sandstone, be investigated and such material will be approved by the Planning Department staff. Andrea Fish seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Andrea Fish motioned to adjourn the meeting, it was duly seconded, and the meeting adjourned at 10:40 a.m. Respectfully submitted, �ia2%tom,/ RoseeAcckeerman Secretary • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APRIL 17, 1985 AGENDA 1 . Roll Call John Emerson Frederic Johnson Christopher M. Greene Andrea Fish Debra Hilbert Anne Farnam Michael Lally 2. Approve minutes of the Design Review Board meeting held on March 13, 1985. 3. Items: a. Dunkin Donuts, 152 Washington Street/James J. Fitzgerald b. Odell Block, 60 Washington Street/David F. Jaquith o MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING • HELD ON APRIL 17, 1985 On Wednesday, April 17, 1985, the members of the Design Review Board met for their regular meeting at One Salem Green, Salem MA. On roll call, the following members were present: John Emerson, Andrea Fish, Debra Hilbert, and Michael Lally. Christopher M. Greene and Anne Farnam were excused. Minutes William Luster called for omissions and/or corrections to the minutes of the DRB meeting held on March 13, 1985. Since there were none, Andrea Fish motioned to accept the minutes as presented. Debra Hilbert seconded, and the minutes were approved as presented. The following items were reviewed: Dunkin Donuts, 152 Washington Street/James J. Fitzgerald A representative from the James J. Fitzgerald, Architects firm described to Board Members the proposed expansion of the storefront of the Dunkin Donuts building at 152 Washington Street. They would like to move the storefront forward to increase the sales area approximately 140 sq. ft. , seating capacity will increase from 18 to 23 seats. The road line and structure stays the same. Andrea Fish thought there would not be enough room for cars to maneuver with the proposed sidewalk in the rounded curb area. The representative stated there is one—way traffic there and the entrance and exit will be marked. He further stated they would return with signs and parking information at a later date. Andrea Fish motioned_ that this preliminary plan be accepted with the conditions that the sidewalk area be left out to allow more room for access to turn, that the entrance and exits be marked as such, and that the dumpster be located on the south side_ of the building. Debra Hilbert seconded the motion. All were in .agreement. No further action at this time. Odell Block, 60 Washington Street/David F. Jaquith David F. Jaquith, Neil Schauer and a representative from David Jaquith' s Architectural firm described the proposed plans for the Odell Block at 60 Washington Street. They presented to DRB members their preliminary plans to rehabilitate the building while completely maintaining its historic characteristics. They described their plans for doors, windows (North American Manufacturing would supply the windows) , and how they plan to recreate the original decor. The problem of necessary light on the fourth floor would be addressed either with skylights (not visible from the street) or the front portion of the roof being constructed of glass. Mr. Schauer stated the DRB would be reviewing further details in the future but wished to bring the preliminary plans before the DRB to see io if there were any significant problems. He further stated that the DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MINUTES APRIL 17, 1985 Page 2 i project is a tax certification project and all restoration would be completed in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior' s standards for restoration. After much discussion and support for the preliminary plan, Mr. Emerson stated he didn't feel the Odell Block owners would find any conflict between this Board and the Massachusetts Historical Commission. Debra Hilbert concurred, as did all members. No further action at this time. A motion to adjourn the meeting was duly made, seconded, and the meeting adjourned at 10:15 a.m. Respectfully submitted, G�G"G��� Rose Ackerman Secretary DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MARCH 13, 1985 AGENDA 1. Roll Call John Emerson Frederick Johnson Christopher M. Greene Andrea Fish Debra Hilbert Anne Farnam Michael Lally 2. Approve minutes of the Design Review Board meeting held on February 28, 1985. 3. Items: a. Salem Inn, 7 Summer Street/Courtyard Cafe/Jack Sullivan b. Gagnon Shoe Repair, 181-183 Essex Street/Joe Portelance n MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING • HELD ON MARCH 13, 1985 On Wednesday, March 13 , 1985, the members of the Design Review Board met for their regular meeting at One Salem Green, Salem, MA. On roll call, the following members were present: Andrea Fish, Debra Hilbert, Anne Farnam, and Michael Lally. John Emerson, Frederick Johnson, and Christopher M. Greene were excused. Minutes William Luster called for omissions and/or corrections to the minutes of the DRB meeting held on February 28, 1985. Since there were none, Anne Farnam motioned to accept the minutes as presented. Andrea Fish seconded, and the minutes were approved as presented. The following items were reviewed: Gagnon Shoe Repair, 181-183 Essex Street Joe Portelance of Portelance Sign presented the Gagnon Shoe Repair sign to the Board. The 3 ' x 4' sign will be made of clear plastic bearing white lettering, "GAGNON' S SHOE REPAIR", and a picture of a shoe. The sign will hang in the window close to the entrance. Anne Farnam motioned to approve e the sign as presented, and Andrea Fish seconded the motion. All were in favor, motion so carried. Salem Inn, Courtyard Cafe, 7 Summer Street William Luster presented the Courtyard Cafe sign details to the Board. The sign will be similar to their present Salem Inn sign, and by the same signmaker, Jack Sullivan. The 2" thick, mahogany, two-sided, 36" x 29" sign will hang from a 2" x 2" steel bracket, which will be bolted into expansion shields in the brick building exterior. The 23K gold leaf lettering and tree will be on a black background. Debra Hilbert motioned to approve the Courtyard Cafe sign as presented, and Michael Lally seconded. All were in favor, motion so carried. Miscellaneous Discussion The topic of coordination of sign manuals was brought before the Board. William Luster advised that he and Debra Hilbert will coordinate on the project, and present proposed sign ordinance changes to the DRB, which they can review between meetings, and return with their concerns. William Luster advised the Board that the Odell Block plans will be introduced at an upcoming meeting. Anne Farnam motioned to adjourn the meeting, and Michael Lally seconded. The meeting adjourned at 9:20 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Rose Ackerman Secretary • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD FEBRUARY 28, 1985 AGENDA 1 . Roll Call John Emerson Frederick Johnson Christopher M. Greene Andrea Fish Debra Hilbert Anne Farnam . Michael Lally 2. Approve minutes of the Design Review Board meeting held on February 13, 1985. 3. Item: Home Plate, 232 Essex Street/Arthur G. Portelance of Leslie • Sign System. • • MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD ON FEBRUARY 28, 1985 On Thursday, February 28, 1985, the members of the Design Review Board met for a special meeting at One Salem Green, Salem, MA. On roll call, the following members were present: Andrea Fish, Debra Hilbert, and Michael Lally. John Emerson, Frederick Johnson, and Christopher M. Greene were excused. Minutes Debra Hilbert motioned to .accept the minutes of the Design Review Board meeting held on February 13 , 1985. Andrea Fish seconded the motion; minutes approved as presented. The following redesigned sign was reviewed: 232 Essex Street — Home Plate Arthur G. Portelance of Leslie Sign System described the redesigned sign, which will maintain the eagle and frame. The proposed square sign insertionwould bear the red letters, "HOME PLATE", on a white panel. This panel is placed on a green field, the lower part of which bears the white letters, "Breakfast Lunch & More". Debra Hilbert questioned if the eagle could be removed. Mr. Portelance advised sanding and painting • the eagle, instead. After discussion, members concurred it was adviseable to have the eagle and shield it is carrying painted one color, gold, while the frame would be bronze. Andrea Fish stated the sign was too colorful. After discussion, Mr. Portelance agreed to remove the black penlines that outlined the white panel. George A. Lucy, Jr. presented to the Board a 1917 picture of Fenway Park, which will hang in the restaurant, along with other baseball memorabelia. Michael Lally motioned to approve the redesigned sign with the restrictions imposed by Board members today. Andrea Fish seconded the motion, all in favor, motion so carried. Meeting adjourned at 9:30 a.m. Resipectufully submitted, //I ��4 Q Rose Ackerman Secretary P DESIGN REVIEW BOARD FEBRUARY 13, 1985 AGENDA 1 . Roll Call John Emerson Frederick Johnson Christopher M. Greene Andrea Fish Debra Hilbert Anne Farnam Michael Lally 2. Approve minutes of the Design Review Board meeting held on January 11 , 1985. 3 . Item: • Home Plate, 232 Essex Street/George A. Lucy, Jr. • MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD ON FEBRUARY 13, 1985 On Wednesday, February 13 , 1985, the members of the Design Review board met at One Salem Green, Salem, MA, with the following members present: John Emerson, Frederick Johnson, Debra Hilbert, and Michael Lally. Anne Farnam and Andrea Fish were excused. Minutes Debra Hilbert motioned to accept the minutes of the Design Review Board meeting held on January 11 , 1985. Michael Lally seconded the motion; minutes approved as presented. The following proposal was reviewed: 232 Essex Street — Home Plate George A. Lucy, Jr. described the proposed sign to replace the one on the present Pewter Pot restaurant. He stated the existing sign frame will remain; printed area describing Pewter Pot will be replaced with proposed sign which shows a baseball bat with chains at either end holding sign which reads "HOME PLATE", which is covering a large portion of a baseball. The sign will have black lettering; stitching on white baseball will be red and blue; all on a green field (not as bright as presentation) . The lighting will be fluorescent. . When questioned regarding the other signs on the restaurant, Mr. Lucy stated one sign may stay, a definite decison has not been made at this time. Bill Luster advised Mr. Lucy that if these signs are replaced, he must come before the DRB for approval of same. After discussion of the proposed sign, Debra Hilbert thought the eagle on the frame of the sign was not appropriate. John Emerson stated it seems as though too much is going on; however, the play on words is fine. Frederick Johnson suggested the eagle and moulding decoration at the bottom of the sign frame be removed. Fred Johnson thought it in Mr. Lucy' s best interest to minimize the Pewter Pot connection and promote his new restaurant image. Michael Lally concurred. Mr. Lucy stated Salem is a colonial city and in addition, was concerned regarding the additional cost of removing the sign frame and replacing same. He did not know if the advised eagle and moulding removal could be done without removing the frame from the building. He requested suggestions re new sign design in keeping with the colonial theme. John Emerson advised Mr. Lucy to further consult with his sign maker, who would assist him. He also requested paint chips to show the exact colors to be used. It was the consensus of the Board to postpone a vote until Mr. Lucy could provide members with further information. Bill Luster requested that Mr. Lucy contact us as soon as he has the information and the DRB MINUTES OF DRB MEETING OF FEBRUARY 13, 1985 Page 2 will arrange a special meeting (Board members concurred) in order to facilitate his planned March 4, 1985 opening. No action at this time. Debra Hilbert motioned to adjourn the meeting; John Emerson seconded; the meeting adjourned at 10:00 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Rose Ackerman Secretary • • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD JANUARY 11 , 1985 AGENDA 1 . Roll Call John Emerson Frederick Johnson Christopher M. Greene Andrea Fish Debra Hilbert Anne Farnam Michael Lally 2. Approve minutes of the Design Review Board meeting held December 12, 1984. 3 . Item: a. Old Telephone Building — 24 Norman Street/Robert Bramble MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 11 , 1985 On Friday, January 11 , 1985, the members of the Design Review Board met at One Salem Green, Salem, MA, with the following members present: John Emerson, Debra Hilbert, and Anne Farnam. Frederick Johnson, Christopher M. Greene, Andrea Fish, and Michael Lally were excused. Minutes John Emerson motioned to accept the minutes of the Design Review Board meeting held on December 12, 1984. Debra Hilbert seconded the motion. The following proposal was reviewed: 24 Norman Street — Old Telephone Building Mr. Bramble described the proposed redesigned windows to be installed at 24 Norman Street. He stated he too was unhappy with the original ones and apoligized for his inability to attend the two previous meetings. The proposed windows would have top panels of glass. The mullion strips would be 2 x 3-1/2". John Emerson asked that the horizontal mullion • strip under the transom window be the same dimension as the vertical mullion; Mr. Bramble agreed. After discussion, Board members were of the opinion that the recommendations and requests made at the first meeting were fulfilled. John Emerson motioned to approve the windows as presented today. Debra Hilbert seconded the motion; motion carried unanimously. Other Matters William Luster reported to Board members that the lighting was checked at the White Hen Pantry building and the light does not ring the building but is only on the Norman Street side of the building. In addition, Domino' s Pizza has removed a sign (formerly in their parking lot) which was not approved by the DRB. Respectfully submitted, Rose Ackerman Secretary "i_ DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DECEMBER 12 1984 AGENDA 1 . Roll Call John Emerson Frederick Johnson Christopher M. Greene Andrea Fish Debra Hilbert Anne Farnam Michael Lally 2. Approve minutes of the Design Review Board meeting held November 21 , 1984. 3. Items: a. Dennis P. Corbett - 18 Front Street/Joe Portelance b. Atlantic Computer - 20 Central Plaza/Don Morse C. Old Telephone Building - 24 Norman Street/David Jaquith MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD ON DECEMBER 12 , 1984 On Wednesday, December 12 , 1984, the members of the Design Review Board met at One Salem Green, Salem, MA, with the following members present: John Emerson Andrea Fish,s Debra Hilbert , Anne Farnam, and Michael Lally. Frederick Johnson and Christopher Greene were excused. After discussion, Anne Farnam motioned to accept the minutes of the Design Review Board meeting held on November 21 , 1984. Debra Hilbert seconded the motion. The following proposals were reviewed: 18 Front Street — Olde Salem Financial Group William Luster introduced Joe Portelance of Portelance Sign Co. , Inc. who described Dennis P. Corbett ' s sign application for 18 Front Street . The proposed sign will be a 24" x 36" wide, projecting sign of gold leaf letters on a dark green field. It will be of redwood with carved letters . Debra Hilbert moved that the sign be approved as presented. Anne Farnam seconded the motion. All members present concurred; motion so carried. • 20 Central Plaza — Atlantic Computer William Luster introduced Don Morse of Sign Works who presented Barbara Reisenstein' s sign application for the business at 20 Central Plaza. The 15" x 12 ' sign will bear 9" gold letters on a Roman dark blue field. This sign is similar to the Pickering Oil sign which is two units to the left of Atlantic Computer in Central Plaza. Michael Lally moved that the sign be approved as presented. Anne Farnam seconded the motion. All members present concurred; motion so carried. 24 Norman Street — Old Telephone Building Architect David F. Jaquith presented the landscape plan for 24 Norman Street. It included three trees for the front of the property; two flowering trees on the right side of the building (between it and the paved driveway) which would be used as a drop—off and pick—up area only; and to the right of this area (against the wood fence) line planting is proposed. Two flowering trees are propose;. for the left side of the building with pea stone surfacing for the area to the left of the building, since utility lines are there. Plantings are proposed, and this side of the building would be fenced off with a gate. John Emerson suggested three trees in this area. Andrea Fish inquired as to the specific types of trees proposed. David Jaquith stated he would furnish that information later since planting will not take place now. At this point , John Emerson stated that the DRB members were looking at • these landscape plans in a preliminary schematic sense as final details will follow on the types of trees. David Jaquith answered in the affirmative. MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING 12/12/84 Page 2 John Emerson suggested grass be used rather than the pea gravel along the e left side of the building. David Jaquith stated he thought that would not present a problem for Mr. Bramble. Andrea Fish questioned if the fence could be removed. David Jacquith stated they do not own the fence , but would inquire. He also stated the exterior lighting plan, and the canopy plan would be brought before the Board in the future. John Emerson stated he would like the record to show that David Jaquith presented plans today describing the windows (which are on—site at present) . They are paired windows , unlike those discussed and recommended by Board members at the previous DRB meeting. Debra Hilbert stated that the windows do not complement the building and are very different from what was originally installed. She suggested that the windows should have a cross configuration which separates the double windows, and the top panel should be glass and not blocked down with an aluminum panel. John Emerson stated that if the windows were allowed as presented today, it would set a bad precedent for the downtown. He also requested that a copy of the meeting' s minutes be sent to Mr. Jacquith. Anne Farnam made a motion not to accept the windows as presented on • plans before the DRB today. Andrea Fish seconded the motion. All members present concurred; motion so carried. Debra Hilbert presented her report of work done thus far regarding the updating of the Sign Ordinance and DRB members further discussed the updating of the Sign Ordinance. The meeting adjourned at 10:45 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Rose Ackerman _ Secretary • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD NOVEMBER 21, 1984 AGENDA 1. ROLL CALL John Emerson Frederick Johnson Christopher M. Greene Debra Hilbert Andrea Fish Anne Farnam 2. Approve minutes of the Design Review Board meeting held on August 8, 1984 and the meeting held on September 12, 1984. 3. ITEMS: a. Domino's Pizza - Salem Sign Company, Inc. b. Video Voyage - Stern Group - Salem Sign Company, Inc. C. 24 Norman Street - Telephone Building - David F. Jaquith • X' MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 21, 1984 On Wednesday, November 21, 1984, the members of the Design Review Board met at One Salem Green, Salem, MA, with all members in attendance: John Emerson, Frederick Johnson, Christopher M. Greene, Debra Hilbert, Andrea Fish, and Anne Farnam. Christopher Greene moved to approve the minutes of the Design Review Board meeting held on August 8, 1984, and the meeting held on September 12, 1984. Frederick Johnson seconded the motion. The following proposals were reviewed: 28 Norman Street: Domino's Pizza Project Administrator Gerard Kavanaugh introduced J. Paul Fennell of the Salem Sign Company, Inc. who described sign applications for two businesses both located at 28 Norman Street: Domino's Pizza and Video Voyage. Domino's Pizza applied for one outside wall sign and two window neon signs. The main Domino's Pizza sign will be a vertical domino (white dots in a red field) and next to that, and approximately the same size, the words "DOMINO PIZZA" (white letters in a blue field) and to the right, "DOMINO'S PIZZA" is repeated horizontally (white letters on a black field). The domino is a corporate logo. The two window signs (each bears red letters with a blue border) will read "FREE DELIVERY" and "OPEN", respectively. Greg Hessen of Domino's Pizza described the entrance of the shop. John Emerson asked if this would be the last tenancy. Greg Hessen answered in the affirmative. Video Voyage Video Voyage applied for a wall sign, internally illuminated, 2' x 8' bearing a white galleon (which was revised, showing sails, and revision presented to the Board) with white letters on a blue field. This sign, plus the Domino's Pizza main sign for the front of the building are similar to a marquee (Domino's Pizza on the right and Video Voyage on the left). Frederick Johnson inquired if the florescent light on the White Hen Pantry would ring the building? He would like the records checked, as well as the building, since he believes this was not approved by the DRB. Christopher Greene moved that both signs be approved as presented. John Emerson seconded the motion. 24 Norman Street - Old Telephone Building Architect David F. Jaquith presented plans for 24 Norman Street. He stated work r' had begun on the old Telephone Building. The red brickwork is being maintained and cleaned whereas the remaining brickwork was painted in a light tone. There will be 39 small units in this complex. Residents will park in Riley Plaza parking area. Estimated selling price is $45,000 for the condominium. John Emerson requested further detail on the windows. Mr. Jacquith stated that he would research further the window applications and resubmit them to the Board. Andrea Fish brought up the matter of sidewalks. Mr. Jacquith stated that if sidewalk is torn up, it will be replaced. Christopher Greene asked about plans for the MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING 11/21/84 Page 2 treatment of the cornice. David Jacquith stated it will be repaired; they will replace, or repair the existing facia. When the matter_,of windows was discussed, John Emerson stated he would be much happier if the cross configuration on the windows is maintained. Mr. Jacquith replied that they are trying to downplay the windows since the building is an average mill type building. He further stated the railing at front and back entrances would be IV' diameter, circular pipe, painted black. David Jacquith stated they plan good lighting to deter loitering problems. Christopher Greene stated he would like a site exploration meeting regarding the landscaping. David Jacquith agreed and requested a premeeting to answer the questions re the windows and any other items brought up at the meeting in order to be prepared for the next DRB meeting in December. Christopher Greene stated he was very happy with the work on the building as it has progressed thus far. The consensus of the group was in support of.this. David Jacquith informed the Board members he would notify the Board as soon as he has the answers to the questions raised so the premeeting could be arranged. William Luster advised the DRB members that Project Administrator Gerard Kavanaugh would like the City Sign Ordinance revised so its rules and those of the Salem Redevelopment Authority are the same. It was suggested that fifteen minutes of each future DRB meeting be devoted to this task. The DRB members pledged their support of this project. • Respectfully submitted, V� �%�y�tliGr�-�r�✓ Rose Ackerman Secretary • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MATTERS: 9/25/84 1. ONE SALEM GREEN - Al Cicconi and Gary Simon described the proposed sign • which consists of a logo (a tree) on the left, and "ONE SALEM GREEN" following. This will replace the word "ENTRANCE" on the 7" high transom. The letters will be 4" tall. They will be made of the same material that is in place now. The sign will be comprised of 1/4" thick Clarendon bold, gold, anodized letters and cut out tree, all on bronze aluminum background. Back Bay Sign Company will construct the sign. There are also two plaques to be installed; one on Church Street corner column; one on brickwork outside of the lobby. These cast bronze plaques - 11" x 7" in size - will bear lettering ("MANAGING AGENT" and "COPLEY INVESTMENTS COMPANIES" and its logo) with beveled edge, and will be made of polished, satin bronze. The oxidized background will be leatherette textured, and the mountings will be concealed. The DRB recommended approval of the sign. 2. LYCEUM RESTAURANT - 41 Church Street - Gerard Kavanaugh, Project Administrator, described the proposed awning the owner would like to place over the entrance door. The color of the awning is a maroon that matches the bricks in color. Its purposes are to provide rain shelter and improve the identity of the front entrance. The awning will have a steel frame lag bolted to the building. It will be 5' across and 216" tall. Andrea Fish noted the rope attached banners was low hanging and would hit the top of the awning and advised this be corrected. The DRB recommended approval of the awning, with the stipulation that the low hanging rope be supported in the middle so it does not hit the top of the awning. Items: 1. SRA APPROVED 2. SRA APPROVED WITH THE STIPULATION THAT THE LOW HANGING ROPE BE SUPPORTED IN THE MIDDLE SO IT DOES NOT HIT THE TOP OF THE AWNING. The above items were approved by the Salem Redevelopment Authority Board at its meeting on September 24, 1984, with a motion by Roland Pinault and a second by Peter Fetchko. Respectfully submitted, Rose Ackerman Secretary DESIGN REVIEW BOARD SEPTEMBER 12, 1984 AGENDA 1. Roll Call John Emerson Frederick Johnson Christopher M. Greene Joy Cowan John F. Collins Andrea Fish Elizabeth Wheaton 2. Approve minutes of the Design Review Board meeting held on August 8, 1984. 3. Items: a. One Salem Green b. Lyceum Restaurant 4j • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 12, 1984 On Wednesday, September 12, 1984, the members of the Design Review Board met at One Salem Green, Salem, MA, with the following members in attendance: John Emerson, Andrea Fish and Elizabeth Wheaton. Project Administrator, Gerard Kavanaugh, introduced the two new members, Andrea Fish of the Planning Department and Elizabeth Wheaton of the Historical Commission. Project Administrator, Gerard Kavanaugh, stated that since John Emerson was the only member present who attended the August 8, 1984, meeting, it would be best to approve the minutes of August 8, 1984, at a later meeting. The following proposals were reviewed: One Salem Green Al Cicconi and Gary Simon described the proposed sign which consists of a logo (a tree) on the left, and "ONE SALEM GREEN" following. This will replace the word "ENTRANCE" on the 7" high transom. The letters will be 4" tall. They will be made of the same material that is in place now. The sign will be comprised of 1/4" thick Clarendon bold, gold, anodized letters and cut out tree, all on bronze aluminum background. Back Bay Sign Company will construct the sign. There are also two plaques to be installed; one on Church Street corner column; one on brickwork outside of the lobby. These cast bronze plaques - 11" x 7" in size - will bear lettering ("MANAGING AGENT" and "COPLEY INVESTMENTS COMPANIES" and its logo) with beveled edge, and will be made of polished, satin bronze. The oxidized background will be leatherette textured, and the mountings will be concealed. John Emerson made a motion to approve the One Salem Green sign and two plaques. Andrea Fish seconded the motion; all were in favor; motion carried. Lyceum Restaurant - 41 Church Street Gerard Kavanaugh, Project Administrator, described the proposed awning the owner would like to place over the entrance door. The color of the awning is a maroon that matches the bricks in color. Its purposes are to provide rain shelter and improve the identity of the front entrance. The awning will have a steel frame lag bolted to the building. It will be 5' across and 216" tall. Andrea Fish noted the rope attached banners was low hanging and would hit the top of the awning and advised this be corrected. John Emerson made a motion to approve the Lyceum Restaurant awning with the stipulation that the low hanging rope be supported in the middle so it does not hit the top of the awning. Andrea fish seconded the motion; all were in favor; motion carried. Respectfully submitted, Ifs- a-l-y-, Rose Ackerman Secretary DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AUGUST 8, 1984 AGENDA 1. Roll Call John Emerson Frederick Johnson Christopher M. Greene Joy Cowan John Wright John F. Collins 2. Approve minutes of the Design Review Board meeting held on April 18, 1984, the meeting of May 9, 1984, and the meeting of July 11, 1984. 3. Items: a. Cherry Webb & Touraine - Charles LeVine of Alco Sign Co., Inc. b. J. P. Schwartz Insurance Company - Mr. D. Chandler. c. Lyceum Restaurant - Joan Boudreau, Awning. _ d. 2-4 Front Street - Copley Investment Company, Public Improvements, Parcel II-D. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 8, 1984 On Wednesday, August 8, 1984, the members of the Design Review Board met at One Salem Green, Salem, MA, with the following members in attendance: John Emerson, Frederick Johnson and Christopher M. Greene. John Emerson made a motion to approve the minutes of the meetings held on April 18, May 9, and July 11, 1984. Frederick Johnson seconded the motion; and all were in favor; motion carried. The following proposals were reviewed: Cherry Webb & Touraine, 250-254 Essex Street Charles LeVine of Alco Sign Co., Inc. presented sketches of the proposed signs which will be similar to the present signs, except for the name change and the fact that they will be more secure than the present signs. The size of the first sign is 4' x 241. It will be bracketed to the building. The sign would have internal illumination. The smaller new sign will be two-sided and size is 3' x 4'8". This is smaller than the existing sign. Christopher Greene made a motion to approve the Cherry Webb & Touraine sign. Frederick Johnson seconded the motion; all were in favor; motion carried. J. P. Schwartz Insurance Company, 16 Front Street Mr. D. Chandler of Sign Works described the proposed carved wood sign which would be 16" X 141. The gold leaf lettering "J. P. Schwartz" would be 10" while the "Insurance Agency" lettering would be 411. The color of the sign is a very dark green. The sign will center over the middle two windows. Its style would match that of the other signs in the area. When questioned, Mr. Chandler stated that presently there are no awnings on the building. John Emerson made a motion to approve the J. P. Schwartz Insurance Company sign. Christopher Greene seconded; all were in favor; motion carried. Copley Investment Company, 2-4 Front Street Project Administrator Kavanaugh presented to the Board members the details of improvements which Copley Investment Company has undertaken on Parcel 1I- D, adjacent to its building. Copley Investment Company has completed its required work, and would like to take title to the property, as the SRA had previously agreed to. Project Administrator noted, though, that there is a problem which still exists. Without any border, the pea gravel on the site continuously spills out onto the sidewalk. The Board members did not want to see railroad ties, but suggested curbing, as designed by Chris Greene. The cost of such an investment could be deducted from the selling price. John Emerson made a motion to approve the Copley improvements, and to request that the new curbing be installed, with the cost of such an improvement to being deducted from the selling price. Fred Johnson seconded the motion; all were in favor; motion carried. • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING AUGUST 8, 1984 Page 2 East India Mall Chris Greene suggested that the Board members and the Project Administrator visit the East India Mall and examine the proposed alterations on site to get a more clear picture of exactly what would be taking place._ The members agreed and promptly left for the site. No action at this time. Respectfully submitted, 47 ��,✓ Rose Ackerman Secretary DESIGN REVIEW BOARD JULY 11, 1984 AGENDA 1. Roll Call John Emerson Richard S. Minturn Frederick Johnson Christopher M. Greene Joy Cowan John Wright John F. Collins 2. Approve minutes of the Design Review Board meeting held on April 18, 1984, and the meeting of May 9, 1984. 3. Items: a. East India Mall, Richard K. McMullan A.I.A. , Banners & Awnings. b. 90 Washington Street, Beneficial Finance; Paul Fennel of Salem Sign Company. C. 8 Barton Square, Theatre East, David Vancelette - York Sign Co. , Jerry Malo. II •_ DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD ON JULY 11, 1984 On Wednesday, July 11, 1984, the members of the Design Review Board met at One Salem Green, Salem, MA, with the following members in attendance: Frederick Johnson and Christopher M. Greene. John Emerson was delayed, but stated that he would review the material presented later in the day. The following proposals were reviewed: 90 Washington Street, Beneficial Finanace - Mr. Paul Fennel of Salem Sign Company described the Beneficial Finance sign, which will be smilar to those across the country. The building frontage is 201. The size of the sign is 10' x 2' high. The sign will be of extruded aluminum casing with rounded edges. It will bear white letters on a very dark green background, with a red rainbow on the right side and will have a matted finish. No visible fasteners will be shown and the electric conduit will run through the sign. The window area is 10' wide and the sign will be centered over the window. Both Frederick Johnson and Christopher Greene approved of the sign. (Later in the day, John Emerson concurred.) Barton Square, Theatre East - Mr. Jerry Malo of York Sign Company described the two signs necessary for advertising Theatre East. The letters are painted with black flat paint on a white background with gold masks as logo in the center. The sign was presented to the Board members in the actual size of the large sign. Christopher Greene recommended the gold colored logo be 20% smaller than the original drawing to be more effective. Frederick Johnson concurred, and agreed that the logo would be more effective if smaller. The sign would be repeated three times, since the large sign is double-faced, while the smaller one would be on the side of the building. These signs would cover existing, already approved signs. Both Frederick Johnson and Christopher Greene approved of the signs, with the stipulation that the logo be 20% smaller to be more effective. (Later in the day, John Emerson concurred.) East India Mall, Banners & Awnings & Sign - Peter Lewis of Schocket Associates and Shelly Miller, Mall Manager, were present along with Architects Tim Mitchell of Sumner Schein, and Ed Cassidy of L.E.A. They presented the scope of alterations planned, which include an extension of the building on East India Square, an extension of stores on Essex Street, the addition of canopies at two entrances, and the hanging of banners along Essex Street and Brown Street. The architects described the alterations Frederick Johnson objected to the design of the improvements to be made on the East India Square Mall that would face the Peabody Museum. Christopher Greene concurred. It was the consensus of the Board members present that the planned granite facing for the exterior of the building, the designed glass area, and • the gable focal point were not architecturally correct additions to the present building. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING JULY 11, 1984 Page 2 It was the consensus of the Board members present that the banners, with the repetitious elephant logo, the canopies, and the improvements along Essex Street were well designerd and planned. Along the Essex Street Mall alterations would have to be made on the Mall to facilitate pedestrian traffic which would be altered by the proposed improvements. (Later in the day, John Emerson concurred.) No action taken until further review. Project Administrator, Gerard Kavanaugh, suggested an informal meeting to assist the architects prepare new designs for the East India Square improvements that this Board does not concur with. It was decided there would be a meeting either July 16 or 17, 1984. Respectfully submitted, Rose Ackerman Secretary • • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MAY 9, 1984 AGENDA 1. Roll Call John Emerson Richard S. Minturn !+ Frederick Johnson Christopher M. Greene Joy Cowan John Wright John F. collins 2. Approve minutes of the DRB meeting held on April 18, 1984. 3. Items: a. 9:00 a.m.: 60 Washington Street, Staley McDermett. b. Forresters Corner Travel, Joe Portelance. c. 10:00 a.m.: Richard Brownell re 6-8 Front Street sign. DESIGN--REVIEW BOARD MEETING MAY 9, 1984 Since we did not have a quorum for the May 9, 1984 meeting of the Design Review Board, it was an advisory meeting. John Emerson was present. 60 WASHINGTON STREET Staley McDermett described the various stages of work that could be done on the 60 Washington Street building: 1) External restoration of the building, including and excluding the storefronts. 2) They would like to clean up the ground floor. 3) Nothing much would be done with the 4th floor windows. 4) An atrium on the 4th floor, open with glass would be a possibility. 5) Aluminum windows would be possible. 6) Wood windows would be possible. 7) Since new heating and air conditioning would cost $75,000, other possibilities were discussed. The Project Administrator stated the building now is Class-B or C office space. FORRESTERS CORNER TRAVEL - Joe.Portelance advised their opening date would be mid-June. The sign they are applying for would be a 20" x 8' sign to be placed to left of windows, as high as possible in order to be seen. The extension on the left side of the building hides a large part of area where sign could be placed. Colors are blue white and turquoise. Sign will read: UNIGLOBE TRAVEL The Travel Solution, Inc. CENTER 6-8 FRONT STREET - Richard Brownell is applying for a lounge sign, 11" x 8', of painted wood: It would be black and gold in color to match the existing signs. Mr. Brownell stated the lot would be cleaned up. Project Administrator, Michael Moniz, advised there are before and after photographs of the area available, if they are needed. Respectfully submitted, Rose Ackerman Secretary • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APRIL 18, 1984 AGENDA 1. Roll Call: John Emerson Richard Minturn Frederick Johnson Christopher Greene Joy Cowan John Wright John Collins 2. Approve the minutes of the meeting of March 14, 1984. 3. Item: (a) Collins Cove Condominiums - Thomas Southworth. MINUTES OF THE MEETI • NG OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD WEDNESDAY, APRIL 18, 1984 On Wednesday, April 18, 1984, the members of the D.R.B. met in open session at One Salem Green, Salem, MA, with the following members present: John Emerson, Richard Minturn, and Joy Cowan. Minutes of the March 14, 1984, meeting were reviewed and unanimously approved. COLLINS COVE CONDOMINIUMS - Project Administrator, Michael Moniz, introduced Thomas Southworth and William R. Roop III of McNeil & Associates, Inc., who attended in order to seek the Board's support for their proposed condominiums for the Collins Cove site. Mr. Southworth and Mr. Roop discussed the designs as presented and a review of the site, as well as their objectives: 1) They must provide a float for residents of the 36 units. 2) They must also provide a walkway and proposed a gravel surfaced 2'-3' unlighted one that would be secured at night. 3) Use of the existinggood g trees. 4) Minimization of the power plant in that area with trees, etc. 5) The 367 units over 7 acres with 40' between buildings - cluster development - was planned. 6) Their plans were designed by Ben Nickerson, Architect, with hope that they would appeal to the City - historic or traditional design, cedar clapboard with brick, country shutters, bay windows, a village of different facades. Some units would have basements, some attics, due • to ledge; some units would have 2 bedrooms, some 3 bedrooms with master suite; all units would have a fireplace therein. Whole back of unit, facing water, would have casement type windows with living room across back to take advantage of view, some decks out back. Garage would be a barnlike structure that would provide atmosphere as well as parking for 16 cars. A community building for lockers, etc., and a small parking lot nearby. Joy Cowan questioned the garage design as it would be the first impression Salem people driving by would experience. John Emerson suggested a carriage house design for the garage. Richard Minturn advised they not underestimate that site; and presented his views: 1) Although the massing and proportion of these units are successful, and the site plan very skillful and courageous, he felt the poeple of Salem very aware of architecture and felt the front (historic) of the units and the back (modern) may meet opposition. 2) He would like to see Andrea Fish at the detailed meeting later on to address subjects of what gardens would look like and development of front yards. 3) Suggested an historic marker on the site. The Project Administrator noted they must apply to the Planning Board for a variance re cluster development to allow attached buildings; and presented his views: ._ 1) Suggested the Architect work with Andrea Fish re the walkway. MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 4/18/84 Page 2 • 2) He also felt there would be opposition to the present plans re the architectural design of units. 3) Stated area consisted of 40's - 50's ranch homes & the Willows. 4) Cited the Cass house on corner of Bayview and Columbus, a Victorian Revival home, as an example of integrating a new home into an estab- lished neighborhood. 5) Requested a review of McNeil & Associates, Inc. schedule. Mr. Southworth stated there would be further discussion with the Architect, Ben Nickerson, via phone, prior to meeting with the D.R.B. again in three weeks - with the Architect and Andrea Fish present, since this was just a preliminary phase because their variance must be granted before they are able to proceed as planned. All agreed; no action taken. Meeting was adjourned at 11:00 a.m. Respectfully submitted, /� �,661 A � Rose B. Ackerman • LU UH Salemffffl Redevelopment 44-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744 4580 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA March 14, 1984: 9:00 A.M. ONE SALEM GREEN 1: Action Video Sign 9:00 A.M. 2: 60 Washington St. Exterior Restoration 3: 12 Lynde St. Exterior Restoration • 4: Salem Inn Sign 10:00 A.M. 5: Bowman's Bakery Sign 6: Washington & Norman St. Site Improvements 7: New Train Station MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD WEDNESDAY, MARCH 14, 1984 On Wednesday, March 14, 1984, the members of the D.R.B. met in open session at One Salem Green, Salem, MA, with the following members present: Chris Green, Fred Johnson and John Wright. Also in attendance was Oscar Padjen representing the Salem Historic Commission. Minutes of the February 8, 1984 meeting were reviewed and unanimously approved. ACTION VIDEO: MASONIC TEMPLE Henry Christenson attended to resubmit a previously approved plan (February 8, 1984) for an exterior sign on Lynde Street. The new sign presented is a 3' x 4' metal projecting sign, Burgandy Color Background, with cream colored wood letters. "Action" lines would be painted on the metal after some discussion the Board recommended a 10% reduction in letter size, that the words "Video" and "Action" be the same, and that all letters be properly centered and spaced. Sign lighting would consist of black or dark bronze kim lighting #3080N, projecting 18 - 24" perpendicular to the sign. D.R.B. Action: Approved with recommendations. S.P,.A. Action: Approved. 60 WASHINGTON STREET Architect Staley McDermet reviewed old photographs of the Odell Block and discussed the progression of changes in the building since 1891. Mr. McDermet informed the Board that this presentation of proposed restoration actions was for informational purposes and that he would be back for a full submission at a later meeting. Mr. McDermet, the Board members and Oscar Padjen from the Historic Commission, discussed the following actions: 1: Move the building's main entrance to its original location on the righ hand corner facing Washington Street. 2: Three new 1st floor storefronts with full length clear glass fronts to the lentil, with a glass return to recessed wood doors. 3. Open up Southeast corner window. Discussion then centered on possible ways to redesign the fourth floor windows, not original to the building, but necessary for the fourth floor's rent ability. Mr. McDermet discussed removing the windows and utilizing roof mounted sky-lights for natural light or cutting in a fourth floor atrium that the offices could -.'ace. Mr. Padjen suggested a continuous sill of brick above the windows to • delineate the sill band may be an alternative solution to separate the cornice from the windows, in summary, the Board and Mr. Padjen work pleased with the direction of restoration design. Mr. McDermet will concentrate efforts on the design of fourth floor window/cornice area. No action necessary. THE SALEM INN: Summer Street Diane Pabich presented a design plan for a projecting two-faced wood carved sign to be attached on the South Western corner between the first and second floor • windows facing Summer Street. The Board recommended that flat iron bars be used for sign hangars rather than chain and that the sign itself be secured to the building to prevent excessive swinging in windy conditions. The Board also recommended that the lower leaves of the carved pineaple be removed and that the letters T-H-E be enlarged. D.R.B. Action: Approved with recommendations S.R.A. Action: Approved BOWMAN'S BAKERY: Essex Street The Board reviewed the proposed sign design and recommended that the words soup, salads, and sandwiches be removed and placed on the store window if desired. The Board also recommended that the sign be mounted panels, installed along the top of the store windows, above the awning. D.R.B. Action: Approved with recommendations S.R.A. Action: Approved 10-12 LYNDE STREET: GEORGE AHMED: The Board reviewed photographs and a proposal for repair and painting of this Italianate 19th Century residenceand made the following suggestions. The Board recommendation for colors followed discussion about the massing and color of brick structures at Temple Court and the Masonic Temple, the grey stone on the Congregational Church and the tan color of the Bus Station and Rufus Choate House. The Board believes the color of 10-12 Lynde Street should be of a contrasting color to adjacent tones. Color: Medium Green/Olive paint with Dark Green trim. Doors: Natural wood stain. Shingle Color: Black. Storm Windows: match color of window trim. Windows: Wood insulated windows with muntins. Other items: OK. except for metal kickplates on doors. The Board also recommended removal of the plant bed in front of the building so as to give the building a full face and truly reflect the full height of the facade. The Board suggested that the fencing be replaced in lieu of the raised plant bed. D.R.B. Action: Approved provided concurrence by Historical Commission. S.R.A. Action: A motion was duly made, seconded and unanimously approved, the meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Michael.Moniz Project Administrator DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ' February 8, 1984 AGENDA 1. Roll Call: John Emerson Richard Minturn Frederick Johnson Christopher Greene Joy Cowan John Wright John Collins 2. Approve the minutes of the meeting of January 18, 1984. 3. Items: (a) Peter Christopoulos for Essex Pizza at the Peabody Block concerning signage and a new door (b) Roxanne Fleazar at 30 Federal St. is seeking approval for color of paint for door (c) Bank of New England for change in dimensions of signs (d) Action Video at the Masonic Temple location concerning signage 4. Other DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MATTERS • MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 8, 1984 On Wednesday, February 8, 1984, the members of the D.R.B. met in open session at One Salem Green, Salem, MA, with the following members present: Joy Cowan, Richard Minturn, Fred Johnson and Minutes of the January 18, 1984 meeting were reviewed and unanimously approved. ESSEX PIZZA AND ROAST BEEF 128 WASHINGTON STREET Peter Christopoulous presented plans for 2 21x6' signs; one facing Barton Square on the corner of building; one facing Washington Street; white background/red letters. Board suggested and Mr. Christopoulas agreed to a wooden sign with lighting fixtures rather than interior lit plastic sign. D.R.B. Action: Board agreed to have Mike Moniz meeti with Mr. Christopoulous and Allen Sign Co. to discuss the Boards suggestions and then have Fred Johnson approve. S.R.A. Action: • Peter Christopolous also presented a plan for a new aluminum entrance door. D.R.B. Action: Board approved new dark bronze anodized aluminum door with deadlite transam. S.R.A. Action: ROXANNE FLESZAR, 30C Federal Street Requested paint color approval for doorway; already approved by Condominium Association. D.R.B. Action: Approved Hamilton Blue color as presented. S.R.A. Action: ACTION VIDEO, 5 Lynde Street Henry Christenson presented sign plans for new store in Masonic Temple building, calling for 4x4 ft. projecting sign, Burgandy background, cream letters, wood with raised letters as per sketch and location plan approved by Architect Staley McDermet. Fred Johnson suggested that caution be observed in the delineation of • the "Lines" through the work "Action." D.R.B. Action: Approved as presented with location between door lentil and leadedlass window. S.R.A. Action: • BANK OF NEW ENGLAND, NORTHSHORE Due to verification of Field Dimensions on the Masonic Temple Building lentils, approval was sought to have 7Y2" high letters instead of six inches letters. D.R.B. Action: Recommended Approval. S.R.A. Action: ASSET MANAGEMENT: FRONT STREET Sign presented as per sketch; black background Gold Leaf letters; to be mounted between the fan window and 2nd floor windows on the west elevation. The Board discussed the need for a sign with less of "An Historical Marker" character and suggested as a minimum recommendation that the black background be changed to a tarrytown or Salem Green. The Board also recommended the addition of Quartormasters (carved ornaments) on the ends of the sign if the owner was The Board also discussed whether the sign was large enough and suggested that the owner consider a longer and wider sign. D.R.B. Action: Recommended Approval. • S.R.A. Action: A motion was duly made, seconded and unanimously approved, the meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Michael Moniz Project Administrator • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD January 18, 1984 AGENDA 1. Roll Call: John Emerson Richard Minturn Frederick Johnson Christopher Greene Joy Cowan John Wright John Collins 2. Approve .minutes of the meeting of December 14, 1983 3. Items: a) Shawmut Bank - resubmittal of revised signage plans b) White Hen Pantry - Pellitier Awning for recommendation to `• approve awning color c) Finkle's - for recommendation to approve signage at 92 tdashing- ton St. (formerly Sunday's) to be done by Portelance Sign Co- d) Jerry's Dept. Store - signage (change to Jerry's Army & Navy Store) e) First Baptist Church - Reverend Marashlian has submitted a sign for recommendation to approve at two locations f) Bank of New England - signage at Masonic Temple 4. Other DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MATTERS MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD January 18, 1984 On Wednesday, January 18, 1984, the members of the Design Review Board met at One Salem Green, Salem, MA with the following members in attendance: John Emerson, Richard Minturn, and Frederick Johnson. A motion was made by Frederick Johnson, seconded by Richard Minturn and unanimously approved to accept the meeting of the meeting of December 16, 1983. DISCUSSION: Shawmut Bank - Advanced Sign Co. resubmitted plans for the signs at the Shawmut Bank on Essex St. The Indian head sign will be made of carved wood and positioned at the same location. The larger sign at the rear of the building would be reduced in size to 3 X 18 with a metal frame, lexan with interior lighting between the second and third floors. The carved wood sign will be p.m.s. 300 blue color, white background, black lettering and a blue logo. The cameo will be surrounded by metal. The Design Review Board recommended approval. White Hen Pantry - The awning at the location will be flame retardant cotton in terracotta coloring. The Design Review Board recommended approval. • John Gate Shop - The shop will be requesting the placement of four green canvas awnings to extend three feet from the shop with possibly an applique on the awning. Pelletier Shade will present more specific details at the next DRB meeting. Finkle's - (formerly the Burger King location on Washington St.) Portelance Sign Co. will be doing the sign for "Finkle's". The DRB recommended approval of the following: The location of the sign, lighting and mounting will remain the same as presented to the Board previously. The style of the lettering will be upper case/lower case to match "Finkle's" style. The size of the lettering is acceptable as shown on the drawing as well as the color. Jerry's Dept. Store - For the sign "JERRY'S ARMY & NAVY STORE" round- faced polyester letters painted in white will be used. The DRB suggested a reduction in the size of the lettering to 5". Signage indicating #301 may remain provided the above change is done. The Board recommended approval with the above provision. Bank of New England-North Shore - (Masonic Temple location) 70 Washington St. - The positioning and location of the signs were acceptable as well as the size of the lettering as presented to the Board on the sketch dated 1/9/84. • DRB 1/18/84 Page 2 41 First Baptist Church - The sign as presented was not acceptable. Some discussion followed concerning the need for a unified approach to directional signage. The Board suggested that perhaps signage on the building or premises might be a better idea rather than an off premises sign. The DRB did not recommend approval. A motion was made by John Emerson, seconded by Richard Minturn and unanimously approved that the meeting of the Design Review Board stands adjourned. The next meeting will be held on February 15, 1984. Respectfully submitted, Cynthia Morrison • MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD January 18, 1984 • On Wednesday, January 18, 1984, the members of the Design Review Board met at One Salem Green, Salem, MA with the following members in attendance: John Emerson, Richard Minturn, and Frederick Johnson. A motion was made by Frederick Johnson, seconded by Richard Minturn and unanimously approved to accept the meeting of the meeting of December 16, 1983. DISCUSSION: Shawmut Bank - Advanced Sion Co. resubmitted plans for tha s,ns iLh'1 SiidWP!LL_ M'l Ua t "2S S: . T7 - T. d;: n Inca -S_ ^ I :.3d? Of carve.. "'Ood old JSi L:on2d at Che s,=e loc., .lOil. at the rear of the building would be reduced in size to 3 K 18 with a metal frame, lexan with interior lighting between the second and third floors. The carved wood sign will be p.m.s. 300 blue color, white background, black lettering and a blue logo. The cameo will be surrounded by metal. The Design Review Board recommended approval. idhite Hen Pantry - The awning at the location will be flame retardant cotton in terracotta coloring. The Design Review Board recommended approval. John Gate Shop -.The shop will be requesting the placement of four green canvas awnings to extend three feet from the shop with possibly an applique on the awning. Pelletier Shade will present more specific details at the next DRB meeting. Finkle's - (formerly the Burger King location on Washington St.) Portelance Sign Co. will be doing the sign for "Finkle's". The DRB recommended approval of the following: The location of the sign, lighting and mounting will remain the same as presented to the Board previously. The style of the lettering will be upper case/lower case to match "Finkle's" style. The size of the lettering is acceptable as shown on the drawing as well as the color. Jerry's Dept. Store - For the sign "JERRY'S ARMY & NAVY STORE" round- faced polyester letters painted in white will be used. The DRB suggested a reduction in the size of the lettering to 5". Signa_e indicating x301 may remain provided the above change is done. The Board recommended approval with the above provision. Bank of New England-North Shore - (Masonic Temple location) 70 Washington St. - The positioning and location of the signs were acceptable as well as the size of the lettering as presented to the Board on the sketch dated 1/9/84. DRB 1/18/84 Page 2 First Baptist Church — The sign as presented was not acceptable. Some • discussion followed concerning the need for a unified approach to directional signage. The Board suggested that perhaps signage on the building or premises might be a better idea rather than an off premises sign. The DRB did not recommend approval. A motion was made by John Emerson, seconded by Richard Minturn and unanimously approved that the meeting of the Design Review Boardstands adjourned. The next meeting will be held on February 15, 1984. Respectfully submitted, CWee C nthi� �orriBon DRB MATTERS: I. Shawmut Bank - Advanced sign Co.- the DRB recommended approva_1_ of the. carved wooden sign and positioning at the Essex St. location. The larger sign at the rear of the building would be reduced in size to 3:418 withsa metal frame; lezan with interior lighting between the second and third floors. The carved wooden sign will be p.m. s. 300 blue color, white background, black lettering and a blue logo. The cameo will be surrounded by metal. 2. white Hen Pantry - The awning at the location will be flame re- tardant cotton interracotta coloring. DRB recommended approval. 3. John Gate. Shop - The shop will be requesting the placement of four awnings and Pellitier Shade will present more specific details at the nest DRB meeting. 4. Finkle's - (formerly Burger King location) - Portelance Sign Co. will be doing the sign for "Fi.nkle' s". The DRB recommended approval of the following: The location of sign, lighting and mounting will remain the same as presented to the Board previously. The style of the lettering will be upper case/lower case to match "Finkles" style. The size of the lettering is acceptable as well as the color. 5. Jerry' s Dept. Store - For the sign "JERRY'S ARMY & NAVY STORE" round-faced polyester letters painted in white will be used. The DRB suggesteda reduction in size of the lettering to 5" . Signage in- dicating #301 may remain provided the above change is done. The Board recommended approval with the above provision. 6. Bank of New''England=N. Shore- (Masonic Temple location/70 Washington • St. ) The positioning and location of the signs were acceptable as well as the size of the lettering as presented to the Board on the sketch dated 1/9/84. DRB recommended approval. 7. First Baptist Church - The sign as presented was not acceptable. Some discussion followed concerning the need for a unified approach to directional signage. The Board suggested that perhaps signage on the building or premises might be a better idea rather than an off-premises sign. Items : 1. SRA APPROVED - 2. SRA APPROVED 4. SRA APPROVED 5. SRA APPROVED 6. SPA APPROVED The above items were approved by the Salem Redevelopment Authority Board at its meeting on February 6, 1984, with a motion by Dominic. Mar.-raffaand a second by Roland Pinau.lt. - • DRB MATTERS: L S'hawmut Bank - Advanced sign Co.-- the DRB recommended approval of the carvedwoodensign and positioning at the Essex St- location The larger sign at the rear of the }wilding would be reduced in size to 3X18 ; w_ith:z metal frame; lexan with interior Lighting between the second and third floors. The carved wooden sign will. be p.m.s. 300 blue color , white background , black lettering and a blue logo. The cameo will be surrounded by metal 2. White Hen Pantry - The awning at the location will be flame re- tardant cotton in terracotta coloring. DRB recommended approval. 3. John Gate Shop - The shop will be requesting the placement of four awnings and Pellitier Shade will present more specific details at the next DRB meeting. 4. F_i_nkle's - (formerly Burger King location) - Portelance. Sign Co. will be doing the sign for "Finkle' s". The DRB recommended approval of the following: The location of sign, lighting and mounting will remain the same as presented to the Board previously. The style of the lettering will be upper case/lower case to match "Tinkles" style. The size of the lettering is acceptable as well as the color. 5. Jerry's Dept. Store - For the sign "JERRY'S ARMY & NAVY STORE" round-faced polyester letters painted in white will be used. The DRB suggested a reduction in size of the lettering to 5" . . Signage in- dicating i`301 may remain provided the above change ' o Y P is done. The Board g recommended approval with the above provision. 6. Bank of New "England-N. Shore- (Masonic 'Temple location/70 Washington • St. ) The positioning and location of the signs were acceptable as well as the size of the lettering as presented to the Board on the sketch dated 1/9/84. DRB recommended approval. 7. First Baptist Church - The Sign as presented was not acceptable. Some discussion followed concerning the need for a unified approach to directional signage. The Board suggested that perhaps signage on the building or premises might be a better idea rather: than an off-premises. sign. Items: 1. SRA APPROVED 2. SRA APPROVED 4. SRA APPROVED 5. SRA APPROVED 6. SRA APPROVED The above items were approved by the Salem Redevelopment Authority Board at its meeting on February 6, 1984, with a motion by Dominic Plarraff.a and a second by Roland P:i.nault. - r DESIGN REVIEW BOARD . December 14, 1983 AGENDA 1. Roll Call: John Emerson Richard Minturn Frederick Johnson Christopher Greene Joy Cowan John Wright John Collins 2. Approve minutes of the meeting of the D.R.B. held on November 16, 1983. 3. Items: a) Copley Investments - Al Cicconi - Las Brisas in the matter of the dumpster and parking siutation at Parcel 11-D (6-8 Front Street) b) Salem Sign - Paul Fennell - White Hen- signage in the matter of signs (refer to minutes of the S.R.A. meeting held of 12/6/83) c) Advanced Sign Co. - Signage at Essex St. branch of Shawmut Bank - Three signs at same location 4. Other Design Review Board matters: Application forms for signs Application forms for other than signs MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD DECEMBER 14, 1983 On Wednesday, December 14, 1983 the members of the Design Review Board met at One Salem Green, Salem, MA with the following members in attendance: John Emerson, Frederick Johnson, Christopher Greene and John Wright. A motion was made by Frederick Johnson, seconded by John Wright and un- animously approved to accept the minutes of the meeting of November 16, 1983. DISCUSSION: Copley Investments - Las Brisas it The Board recommended temporary landscaping with modifications so as to adapt the site for future use as an outdoor eating area. A barrier or fence, preferably a 3'wood fence would physically prevent parking and the color should match the existing trim color. Dumpster enclosure}color will also match. All materials-will be 1x6" pine or 'to match existing._HVAC.-enclosure. - The Board recommended approval as modified on the plan dated December 14, 1983. SRA ACTION: Approved as recommended by the DRB White Hen Pantry - Salem Sign For the sign at the west elevation, the lettering will be affixed to the building with concealed lighting per schematic drawing submitted on December 14, 1983. , The Board recommended approval. SRA ACTION: Approved as recommended by the DRB Shawmut Bank - Advanced Sign M,,�✓" The sign at the south side elevation was recommended for approval per plan dated December 14, 1983. The front projecting sign will be left as is with the option that at a future date it may be proposed to change it. The sign at the rear of the building between the ground floor and second floor windows will need to be reviewed further after submission of a scale of elevation. The Board requested submittal of revised plans for signage for further review. BUSINESS: The form for application for signs has been modified and will be used on a trial basis. A motion was made by Christopher Greene, seconded by John Wright and un- animously approved that the meeting stand adjourned. Respectfully' submitted, ynthia Morrison�� DESIGN REVIEW BOARD November 16, 1983 AGENDA 1. Roll Call John Emerson Richard Minturn Frederick Johnson ` Christopher Greene Joy Cowan John Wright John Collins 2. Approve minutes of the DRB meeting held on October 12, 1983 3. Items: Bob Scagliotti - Forresa:er's Corner - • The Salem YMCA - sign White Hen Pantry - sign Lafayette Plaza - sign 4. Discussion of other DRB matters MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD NOVEMBER 16, 1983 On Wednesday, November 16, 1983 the members of the Design Review Board met at One Salem Green, Salem, MA with the following members in attendance: John Emerson, Richard Minturn, Frederick Johnson and John Wright. A motion was made, seconded and approved to accept the minutes of the meeting of October 12, 1983. DISCUSSION: YMCA A free standing sign on a pylon may be erected on the site shown oft the plans with the following changes as recommended by the DRB: a. The type style should be simplified (such as Serif) b. The brackets will be clean and simple c. Gold leaf will be used on lettering d. The drawing of a witch shown on the sign may or may not be eliminated depending on the necessity of it as part of the "Y" logo. e. The sign will have the word entrance with an arrow to indicate direction f. The shape of the plaque will be simplified • The Board noted whereas the elements of hardship apply because of inadequate visibility a pylon sign would be recommended. DRB ACTION: recommended approval with the noted changes SRA ACTION: approved with recommendations and changes by DRB Forrester's Corner The Board recommended approval of the Flaxbush color stain for the shingles on the building. DRB ACTION: recommended approval SRA ACTION: approved White Hen Pantry The Board deferred action on plans submitted because proper signage re- gulations had not been met. Some of the following recommendations were made: 1. West elevation - dispose of the pylon and use the hen logo on a carved wooden sign with no letters. Perhaps with an interior lit logo 2. South elevation - the matter needs to be looked at further concerning method and materials • Reference was made to the sign manual, Section II, page 14. ' The Board would like additional information on materials. DRB ACTION: deferred action SRA ACTION: none DRB 11/16/83 Page 2 • Lafayette Plaza Design and lettering for the 1176 sign was recommended for approval DRB ACTION: recommended approval SRA ACTION: approved DRB MEETING TIME CHANGE: It was unanimously agreed to change the time of the future meetings from 8:30 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. Date will remain the same - 2nd Wed- nesday of the Month. A motion was made by John Wright, seconded by Fred Johnson and unanimously approved that the meeting of the Design Review Board stands adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Cynthia oP/�-t��U � • • MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD OCTOBER 12, 1983 • On Wednesday, October 12, 1983 the members of the Design Review Board met at One Salem Green, Salem, MA with the following members in attendance: Richard Minturn and Christopher Greene. A motion was made to approve the minutes of the meeting of the D.R.B. of September 14, 1983 and seconded for approval. DISCUSSION: Salem Inn Diane Pabich discussed various alternatives to installing storm windows at 7-9 Summer St. and explained that even though she did not want to use exterior storm panels, the existing interior window casements and shutters made it impossible to install interior panels without removing the original casements. Ms. Pabich requested approval on a single white frame exterior panel system that would be installed and removed seasonally in conjunction with window washing and air conditioner placement. The . Board approved as requested. DRB ACTION: Recommended approval SRA ACTION: Approved Masonic Temple - Architect Staley McDermet requested a change in the approved concrete color of the small plaza on Lynde St. from a dark sand color to a color matching the existing area walks. The Board approved as requested. DRB ACTION: Recommended approval SRA ACTION: Approved Forrester's Corner Jeff Stern reviewed proposed changes in the east and north rear elevations as described in a letter to the S.R.A. dated September 22, 1983. After discussing various alternatives to redwood siding, such as aluminum or other materials, the Board agreed to the use of uniform textured wall covering (stucco) as manufactured by Thoro-Products. All concrete block joints are to be obscured and installation of expansion joints as necessary is required to prevent cracking. Color is Indian Buff. • DRB ACTION: Recommended approval SRA ACTION: Approved f D.R.B. 10/12/83 Page 2 Walk-In Medical Center Mr. Rogers discussed the new center located in the former Barnetts Fabric store. The Board agreed to individually review the final design • (tentative design attached) as soon as it is properly sketched and detailed. DRB ACTION: Tentative approval SRA ACTION: Approved contingent upon resubmittal A motion was made to adjourn and seconded that the meeting of the Design Review Board stands adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Cynthia Morrison • l Z2.. Sl"V4967- X_ L MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD SEPTEMBER 14, 1983 On Wednesday, September 14, 1983 the members of the DESIGN REVIEW BOARD met at One Salem Green, Salem, MA with the following members in attenaance: John Emerson, Frederick Johnson, Joy Cowan and John Wright. A motion was made by Frederick Johnson, seconded by Joy Cowan and unanimously approved to accept the minutes of the meeting of August 10, 1983. DISCUSSION: 262 Essex St. - Robt. Scagliotti was present to submit brick and shingle samples. Brick will be Stonehill and shingles will be black pepper/Nantucket smooth. DRB ACTION: Recommended approval SRA ACTION: APPROVED',' Forrester's Corner - Brick samples, .Stonehill and shingle samples, black pepper Nantucket smooth were submitted for approval. DRB ACTION: Recommended approval SRA ACTION: Referred back to the D.R.B. The Salem Inn - Diane Pabich was present to bring a sketch of the design for a sign to be located at the corner of the driveway. The Board felt a "bed & breakfast" aspect should be emphasized on the sign. It was also suggested that a banner might be more effective for vehicular traffic. DRB ACTION: Recommended approval subject to modification of sign with wording readjusted so as to emphasize bed & breakfast aspect. A drop-off of re- submission will be required. SRA ACTION: Approval to accept the D.R.B. recommendations with the exception of sign modification. Further D.R.B. action will be necessary. Empire Clothing - sign - New sign at rear of the building will have 24" in- dividual letters, 2" deep fabricated stainless steel with a baked enamel red finish to match the awning color at the front of the store. The existing sign will be removed. Lighting of the sign will be another matter to be discussed separately. DRB ACTION: Recommended approval with the exception of lighting SRA ACTION: Approved DRB 9/14/83 Page 2 Travel World - June Brown presented materials and sketch for a banner on the front of the building. The Board suggested smaller letters on a diagonal • angle on the same base line (on both sides of the banner) . The design would be repeated on both sides of the banner. DRB ACTION: Recommended approval 4 SRA ACTION: APPROVED Masonic Temple - Staley McDermet along with Andrea Fish of the Salem Planning Department presented landscaping/architectural plans for the rear of the building. Reference here was made to the site plan dated 9/14/83 as pre- sented to the Board. DRB ACTION: Recommended approval SRA ACTION: APPROVED Beef & Oyster - The Board recommended approval of the three lights on the Derby Sq. side of the building at the positioning level as indicated. DRB ACTION: Recommended approval SRA ACTION: APPROVED A motion was made by Frederick Johnson, seconded by Joy Cowan and unanimously approved that the meeting of the Design Review Board stands adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Cynthia Morrison • ry, DESIGN REVIEW BOARD - August 10, 1983 AGENDA 1. Roll Call John Emerson Richard Minturn Frederick Johnson Christopher Greene Joy Cowan John Wright John Collins 2. Approve minutes of the DRB meetings held in May and June 3. Items: Bob Scagliotti - Bowman's June Brown - Travel World - banner approval Arthur Ingemi - Beef & Oyster - positioning of outdoor lights at eating area Staley McDermet - Masonic Temple 4. Discussion: Design Review Board Procedure - form for other than signs DRB will discuss control of local recommendations regarding Pickering Wharf to be a matter for SRA approval (rather than going through the DRB) MEETING OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD AUGUST 10, 1983 On Wednesday, August 10, 1983 the members of the Design Review Board met at One Salem Green, Salem, MA with the following members in attendance: Richard Minturn, Frederick Johnson and John Wright. A motion was made by Frederick Johnson, seconded by Richard Minturn. amd unanimously approved to accept the minutes of meetings of May 11, 1983, June 8, 1983 and July 13, 1983. DISCUSSION: Bowman's Lot - Bob Scagliotti was present to discuss further plans for building construction on Parcel S-1. The first floor would be office/sales, the second and third floor space would be office/professional. At this time, Mr. Scagliotti asked for approval of preliminary drawings as described to the Board. If possible, he would like to begin construction by Sept. 1, 1983. The driveway along the side of the Roger Conant Bank would still exist at its present 20' width. The Board suggessted that a tree might be planted in the area between the building to be constructed and the existing building to the west. He plans to have a fence to span the two buildings and the tree could be planted behind the fence. A simulated granite material will be used to soften the outside appearance of the building. The windows will be combination storm and screen 1 with triple glazing. The sills will project slightly. The Board made several suggestions for revisions to the plans 1. Mr. Scagliotti should check with a landscape architect to see if a tree could be planted in the area suggested to determine if one would survice in that particular location. 2. The windows on the original drawing would be changed from 214" to 216" (218" m.o.) 3. The single door with side lights should also be shown on the plan 4. Revisions for two doorways will be brought back to the DRB for presentation 5. Mr. Scagliotti will study the idea of wrapping or enclosing with a fence the spiral staircase at the rear of the building for safety purposes in terms of owner's r liability DRB ACTION: Approved subject to submission of final sketches indicating variations/changes to be presented to SRA SRA ACTION: Approved with the above revisions (Items 1-5) except for details, color samples and materials. r r . DRB 8/10/83 Page 2 Travel World - Chris Tragakis presented plans for an outside banner at Travel or . Fabric and dimensions were presented. The bottom of the banner would be 18' from the sidewalk. The bottom of the banner would be secured by lines or tethered. It was suggested that the banner be secured to the building at a 60 degree angle with a 4' pole flush mounted and centered. The Board recommended that Mr. Tragakis return to his designer to change the design of the banner to repeat the letters "Travel World". The brackets and fixtures should be similar to those used on the projecting Travel World sign. Once graphics change, plans should be resubmitted. DRB ACTION: Plans to be resubmitted SRA ACTION: None Masonic Temple - Staley McDermet was present with drawings and sketches for design concept at the rear of the building. The design concept is to draw people through the building and keep the loading somewhat separate. The grade level was discussed as to whether 6' may or may not be the right idea. The spacial area might be enhanced with signage. The architect felt a direct line should be maintained leading to the rear entrance. The Board members along with the arthitect and the SRA Project Administrator adjourned to view the site and further discuss architectural plans and make suggestions for the designated area. a DRB ACTION: No action taken until further discussion SRA ACTION: None Winter Island - John Wright expressed his interest on behalf of the Board members with regard to involvement - perhaps in an advisory capacity in determining what will happen to Winter Island in the future. A motion was made by Frederick Johnson, seconded by Richard Minturn and unanimously approved that the meeting of the Design Review Board stands adjourned. (10:45 a.m.) Respectfully submitted, Cynthia Morrison DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING - WEDNESDAY, JULY 13, 1983 • AGENDA 1. Roll Call: John Emerson v Richard Minturn ✓ Frederick Johnson Christopher Greene Joy Cowan John Wright John Collins 2. Approve minutes of the DRB meeting held Wednesday, May 11, 1983. 3. Approve minutes of the DRB meeting held Wednesday, June 8, 1983. .X�. F-• Ci' 4. 9:00 a.m. " Kay Taft will be present along with her architect to discuss the construction of an open deck on her Pickering Wharf Condominum. P,>,=, ,Wc ., 1N • 9:15 a.m. v Paul Smutney will be present to discuss a new door at the side entrance of the Pewter Pot. 9:30 a.m. Staley McKermet will be present to discuss the Masonic Temple Building and 13 Barton Square. 5. Business/Discussion (tabled from previous meeting) DRB recommeded review procedure and design approval form for other than signs. -,:r5,, Matters approved/nbn ap oyed by SRA (see SRA minutes item' through i) • MEETING OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD WEDNESDAY, JULY 13, 1983 On Wednesday, July 13, 1983 the members of the Design Review Board met at One Salem Green, Salem, MA with the following members in attendance: John Emerson and Richard Minturn. Due to lack of a quorum, the minutes of the meetings held in May and June were tabled for approval until the next meeting. DISCUSSION: Kay Taft, owner of a condominum, Unit K-4 at Pickering Wharf presented her proposal to add an open deck as per sketches presented. There are no abutter objections and she would like to begin construction immediately. DRB Action: Members present had no objection to the plan and recommended approval pending review by the SRA. SRA Action: Approved Karl Detato Construction presented plans to extend the deck on a condominum owned by Mary Vaillencourt, 486-D at Pickering Wharf. DRB Action: Members present had no objection to the extension and recommended approval by the SRA. SRA Action: Approved Paul Smutney of the Pewter Pot Restaurant presented his plan with regard to the service door at the side entrance. He would either rehang the door to swing outward and remove the window in the door or as the Building Inspector suggested, replace with a solid door of the same style without a window in order to comply with egrees regulations. DRB Action: Members present recommended approval by the SRA for the solid door without a window. SRA Action: Approved DESIGN REVIEW BOARD PROCEDURE: The following suggestions were made concerning changes in the DRB Application for Design Review Board approval - other than signs: a) Item #4 - delete "Sign Design" and insert "Other" b) Item #5 - delete "sign" . c) Item #6- move asterisk to "other" In General the disucssion was favorable, however, due to lack of a quorum, no action was taken pending approval by the full Board. - 13 BARTON SQUARE: Staley McDermet, AIA, presented plans and drawings for a new fence to be erected in the parking area. It would be a common, rustic fence with columns at each end. The existing parking area will contain four spaces surfaced with cobblestones. It was recommended that a tree be planted in the yard area. DRB Action: Members recommended approval of sketch as presented. SRA Action: Approved MASONIC TEMPLE: Staley McDermet, AIA, presented tentative plans and drawing for the rear of the building. A grassy area in the private property section was shown. It was suggested that a design of concrete might be better than all brick or to use a brick trim. Discussion as to use of trees and/or planters was held left open to further discussion when plans will be presented for finalization. DRB Action: No action taken until more complete plans are presented. SRA Action: pending Before concluding the meeting, the Design Review Board at its next meeting would like to discuss sending a letter to the SRA regarding residential alterations in the Pickering Wharf area. It was felt that the SRA should control local recommendations directly, rather than going through the DRB. Meeting adjourned 10:00 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Cynthia Morrison • ® � v SalemEE Red -lopment G44-6900�t ®rity ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744 4580 MEETING OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD WEDNESDAY, JUNE 8, 1983 On Wednesday, June 8, 1983 the members of the Design Review Board met at One Salem Green, Salem, MA with the following members in attendance: Richard Minturn and Frederick Johnson. Due to lack of a quorum, the minutes of the previous meeting were tabled for approval until the next meeting. TABLED: for further action/discussion: a. DRB recommended review procedure and design approval form for other than signs b. Matters approved/non approved by SRA (see SRA meeting minutes items a through i) BUSINESS: p r Sign Works - Re: Coon's Card Shop - sign per sketch presented to Board DRB: Approved (subject to SRA final approval) SRA: Approved as presented Jamie Russell - Interior lettering and coloring for window sign DRB: Approved SRA: Approved as presented Meeting adjourned 9:15 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Cynthia Morrison ' l Salem Redevelopment uthprity ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744-4580 MEETING OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD WEDNESDAY, JUNE 8, 1983 On Wednesday, June 8, 1983 the members of the Design Review Board met at One Salem Green, Salem, MA with the following members in attendance: Richard Minturm. and Frederick Johnson. Due to lack of a quorum, the minutes of the previous meeting were tabled for approval until the next meeting. TABLED: for further action/discussion: a. DRB recommended review procedure and design approval form for other than signs b. Matters approved/non approved by SRA (see SRA meeting minutes items a through i) BUSINESS: Sign Works - Re: Coon's Card Shop - sign per sketch presented to Board DRB: Approved (subject to SRA final approval) SRA: Approved as presented Jamie Russell - Interior lettering and coloring for window sign DRB: Approved SRA: Approved as presented Meeting adjourned 9:15 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Cynthia Morrison "' ell S'all ' Medevebom nq.q. `_ ,� s^ TELEPHONE 744-6900 Ruth rit y ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 7444580 MEETING OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD WEDNESDAY, MAY 11, 1983 On Wednesday, May 11, 1983, the members of the Design Review Board met at One Salem Green, Salem, MA with the following members in attendance: John Emerson, Richard Minturn, Frederick Johnson, Christopher Greene, Joy Cowan and John Wright. David Clark from the Salem Historic Commission was also present. A motion was made by Christopher Greene and seconded by Richard Minturn that the minutes of the meeting of the DRB of April 6, 1983 be accepted. The Board reviewed the following: FORRESTER'S CORNER White Hen Pantry. Due to the store operational procedures, the store owners have requested that the entrance be moved from the center of the south elevation to the southwestern corner. The southern sign panel has been shifted in order that support posts are aligned in front of window columns. The Board noted that there should not be a sign panel on any western elevation. DRB Action: Plans are approved subject to approval of colors and materials (incorporating changes) based upon the sub- mitted drawings. Approval was given for a planter strip using a 3' hedge material at grade level. Moved by Richard Minturn and seconded by Frederick Johnson SRA Action: Approved MASONIC TEMPLE With regards to the facade restoration, Mr. McDermet presented elevation plans for D.R.B. approval. The back rear corridor will serve as a loading area and igalk thru area to create a possible mall effect. In the rear of the building the door will be aluminum. . Relative to colors, grey and dark bronze is to be used. The marble below the sill at the base will have to be replaced and Mr. McDermet presented the two types of marble samples to be used. B R Salernam WRede elopi ent 44-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 07970 TELEPHONE 744 4580 MEETING OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD WEDNESDAY, MARCH 9, 1983 On Wednesday, March 9, 1983, the members of the Design Review Board met at One Salem Green, Salem, Mass. with the following members present: John Emerson, John Wright, Richard Minturn, Chris Greene, Joy Cowan and Fred Johnson. The Board reviewed the following proposals: Forrester's Corner - Jeffrey Stern and Robert Scagliotti The Board was advised that the design for the end walls have been changed to brick, as recommended. The band along the bottom has been shortened and the color of the awning has been toned down. The window design has also been changed, the White Hen windows are to be fixed windows and the other windows are to be operating - windows. There will be a need for small compressors to be located on the flat roof which will not be seen by the nature of the building. 0- --7 In regard to the walkway, it was noted by the architect that he cannot see the need for another walkway between the Telephone Company building and the development parcel if there is a walkway going through the Heritage Plaza condominium project. This will be discussed by. the SRA Board at another meeting. The DRB recommended bringing the brick work all the way down to the sidewalk. The architect agreed to study this recommendation as well as the utilization of the brick work for the chimney return. The brick planter will be carried all around the perimeter of the parking area. The type of sign has not been discussed as yet. The architect felt that the sign would be located up over the entrance. As far as he knows it will not be lit. DRB ACTION: The DRB approved the preliminary plan subject to the recommendations being considered by the architect for the next design submission. The DRB approved the preliminary plan in order to allow the developer to proceed with the building permit process. SRA ACTION: Approved • MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD Wednesday, May 11, 1983 -2- DRB ACTION: Elevations approved as submitted except for front main entrance and marble samples; Moved by Richard Minturn and seconded by John Wright and unanimously approved with the the above exceptions. SRA ACTION: Approved PEABODY BLOCK _ The fourth revision as shown on plans by Aeshag Merguerian was app- roved in light of the circumstances that the owner, Mr. Mergueraan, had explained. However, the Board noted that the third revision was aesthetically preferred. At the conceptual level the molding is questionable and may need approval. DRB ACTION: Approved preliminary drawings, "4th revision," as submitted with a motion by Christopher Greene and seconded by Richard Minturn. SRA ACTION: Approved LOBSTER SHANTY The sign for the Lobster Shanty was approved. Mr. Purell noted that this will be a temporary sign until a decision is made on • _ the alteration plans. The permanent sign will be curved bollard type similar to all other market signs. It was noted that the categories for unapproved signs be reviewed because of the bonding issues involved. DRB ACTION: Approved with a motion by Christopher Greene and seconded by John Minturn with unanimous approval. SRA ACTION: Not Approved - 5-9 SUMMER ST. - THE SALEM INN - The owner, Diane Pabich and the architect reviewed alternative facade treatments. a) Slate roof - The existing slate and rise for dormers will be re- placed with asphalt roof (GAF charcoal blend) b) Third dormer - replicate with two existing dormer with slate on sides c) Interior storms - will be installed with removable screens for seasonable use d) Shutters - will be used for three windows and the fourth floor (attic) MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD Wednesday, May 11, 1983 -3- e) Copper roofing for - for the two porticos and small entry for the basement f) Side entry porch - approved reconstruction as in photograph presented to the Board g) Back porch - Use of a bracket as opposed to a column was re- commended and is to be submitted to the DRB h) Spirals - will be black metal for fire escapes I) Colors, - Glossy Navajo white on windows and trim; shutters will be black. The owner will submit sign for individual Board member approval prior to sign meeting on May 23. j) Type will be Roman letters DRB ACTION: Items A-J are approved as submitted in the design package with the exception of items H & J as noted. A motion was made by Christopher Green and seconded by Richard Minturn. SRA ACTION: Approved with the exception of item G (support brace for porch) HERITAGE PLAZA CONDOMINUMS - Fence The pickets will be straight and parallel to the ground and the color will be a dark bronze. A motion was made by Christopher Greene and seconded by Richard Minturn DRA ACTION: Approved as per sketch SRA ACTION: Approved PEABODY MUSEUM - The windows on the Liberty Street side will be sealed off and the Board recommended a belt course angled with shadow line DRB ACTION: Recommended horizontal/vertical belt course at transition between existing exterior wall and the new one. The windows were approved. A horizontal cornice line at the parapet was recommended. Moved by Christopher Greene and seconded by Richard Miinturn. Approved with cornice line at parapet. SRA ACTION: Approved • NEW ENGLAND TELEPHONE - Dual pay phones will be replaced with single pay phones at three locations: Salem Savings Bank, Beef N' Oyster Restaurant and the Market area. MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD Wednesday, May 11, 1953 -4- DRB ACTION: Approved providingthat the brick work or other existing material is properly restored. Moved by Christopher Greene and seconded by Richard Minturn. SRA ACTION: Approved LYCEUM RESTAURANT - Photographs were submitted for the entrance work on the Church Street side. Initially only interior vestibule work was contemplated. How- ever, during the vestibule construction, code requirements required an "exit-out" doorswingfrom the exterior door. The owner was away and the contractor proceeded with the installation prior to DRB approval. The DRB discussed the new bronze aluminum double doors installed at the Church Street entrance and felt that two wooden doors, similar to the Pub entrance, would be more appropriate. DRB ACTION: Recommended that wooden doors be used rather than the ex- isting bronze aluminum. SRA ACTION: No Action until further review A motion was made by Christopher Greene and seconded by Richard Minturn that the meeting of the Design Review Board stand adjourned at 12:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, . Cynthia Morrison • —WON r Salem Redevelopment 44-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744 -4580 MEETING OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD WEDNESDAY, APRIL 6, 1983 On Wednesday, April 6, 1983, the members of the Design Review Board met at One Salem Green, Salem, MA with the following members present: John Emerson, Richard Minturn, Christopher Greene, Joy Cowan and John Wright. The Board reviewed the following: BARTON SQ. Sign With regard to the plaque picturing a mug of beer, the size of the sign was agreeable to the Board. The Board would approve all lettering with the exception of the color of the mug; they would prefer a cream color for the mug. The Board suggested eliminating the scroll aspect of the bracket design. The Board recommended that the bulb highlighting the • sign is questionable. . As to the location of the sign the Board suggested that it could be centered over the entrance and that the light illuminat- ing it should shine down (similar to that at the Lyceum) . DRB ACTION: Sign Approved Applicant shall come before the Board with his future ideas for the lighted aspect of the sign. t SRA ACTION: Approved 5/2/83 GEORGE PEABODY COOP TRUST - Sign The Board felt that the script nature of the sign seems to be incon- sistent with the nature of the age of the building. In addition, the character of the sign would be more consistent if the script lettering could be eliminated. If possible it was suggested that the small window area would be an appropriate place to install the sign. Mr. St. Jacques, representing the design firm, and Mr. Nelson, representing the bank were optimistic that they would do all they could to conform to any design requirements made. The Board recommended that the cap atop the sign should be removed. As to location the Board would like the sign to be flush to the corner, not to the pediment. DRB ACTION: Approved - Provided cap atop sign is removed. SRA ACTION: Approved 5/2/83 FRANK ADAMS - STAHL ASSOCIATES - Mezzanine Expansion The Board would like to have the same window pattern repeated on the East elevation. The brick should match the existing brick. MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD APRIL 6, 1983 Page 2 _ The Board felt there was no objection to the proposed expansion as presented. Mr. Adams will provide additional information if re- quested by the Board. DRB ACTION: Tentative Approval SRA ACTION'* No Action Taken 5/2/83 iN c "W =. . DDRB REVIEW PRODEGURE y Notations and corrections should be made on original application form. Suggestions regarding same will be reviewed by the Board. Respectfully submitted, �J Cynthia Morrison __I f ........1. ® a SalemEfl e evelopent Authority44-6900 ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE baa 4580 MEMO TO: DRB FROM: Michael Moniz d ` DATE: April 5, 1983 SUB,T: DRB MEETING - April 6, 1983 - 9:00 a.m. First of all, please accept my apologies for not attending this D.R.B. meeting. Due to a scheduling problem (I wrongly assumed a month ago that you would be meeting on the second Wednesday) , I have the pleasure of spending the day in beautiful downtown Holyoke: The Arson-A-Day capitol of the State. Hopefully, the regular agenda to this meeting is still short. However I hope that you will have some time to review the following important • topics. 1. MARKET AREA The S.R.A. and the D.R.B. have lately been in the position of reacting to expansion proposals from tenants of the Market stalls. - You are all personally aware that this leads to decisions that no one is satisfied with. The Market area has always been a difficult design issue due to its public ownership, physical layout, changing patterns of use, and the fact that a variety of city agencies are involved in the approval process. An effort has been made by the S.R.A. to establish guidelines with the Market Commission to curb any further conflicting decisions made by both bodies, however the Market Commission has not had a quorum (there being only two attendant members) since December. The S.R.A. has before it, a request for the expansion of the Heritage Shop. The Lobster Shanty has constructed toilet facilities within its Sstructure, so it appears that they have put aside Lheir expansion plans. Memo to; DRB -2- April 5, 1983 Fzom< It .Moniz • At our last meeting the S.R.A. adopted the attached "interim policy" which basically prohibits any further permanent expansion into the public spaces at the Market Area. The rationale for this policy is as follows: 1. The Market area was designed with certain sight lines and aesthetics which should be strictly adherred to. 2. The enclosure of the stalls was allowed to make the small craft operations and food establishments viable on a year- round basis 3. The type of business that should be in the market area should know at the start of their operation the physical limits of their establishment. If a business becomes too successful from their space,' the business should find a more permanent space better suited to their needs in Salem. Would we allow 'Almy's to enclose part of the Mall because they needed in- ventory space? • The attached "interim policy" will be sent to the present Market Commissioners, Mayor, and the Heritage Shop owner. . The S.R.A. _'asks you to please review this policy and comment accordingly. 2. DRB RECOMMENDED REVIEW PROCEDURE The S.R.A. has reviewed the format and subject to any changes that you may make, the Authority will accept the format at their next meeting. Thank you `s Michael Moniz MM/cm • attachment ("interim policy") Saler R. edev lop end OA6tA�_ority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744-6900 INTERIM POLICY GUIDELINES for DEVELOPMENT and MAINTENANCE of SALEM MARKET AREA Whereas the Salem Redevelopment Authority has responsibility for designation and acceptance of all commercial and retail trade use and design within the Heritage Plaza East Urban Renewal Area in conformance with the Urban Renewal Plan, and whereas the Salem Market Area is within the designated Heritage Plaza East Urban Renewal Area, the Salem Redevelopment Authority establishes the following guidelines for development and maintenance of the Salem Market Area in keeping with the Authority's goal to preserve the historical, quality, architectural integrity, economic vitality and public use of the Salem Market Area. OBJECTIVE #1: To maintain all existing structures and "dight lines" with particular emphasis on the South to North view of Old Town • Hall, by limiting all non-maintenance construction, re-con- struction, or physical alterations of the Market Area buildings used for commercial purposes to interior refinements that enhance or sustain allowed use of such buildings. OBJECTIVE #2 To insure that public access to all public area is preserved at all times, unless limited periodically by the• issuance of, a Market Area & Tourist Commission permit to conduct commercial "activity-in conjunction with a Commission approved or sponsored - event. These objectives shall serve as an interim set of guidelines governing policy development, or maintenance of the Salem.-Market Area with regard to use and design, until such time as the S.R.A. and the Salem Market Area & Tourist Commission can develop and mutually adopt ongoing guidelines and policy. Adopted this 4th day of April, 1983 by the Salem Redevelopment Authority'. Respectfully submitted: towI �Gary✓Moore MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD MARCH 9, 1983 Page 2 'kachtwear Research; Inc. The sign is to be located on the left hand corner of the window complex (originally occupied by Energy Work, in the Salem Laundry Building) . It will . be a projecting sign attached to the building by an antique wrought iron bracket. The store will be an arm of the factory operation located at Shetland Park. There are no plans to light the sign since there is adequate lighting along the street. The DRB recommended the sign itself should not extend beyond the bracket edge. The sign could be raised up toward the bottom part -of the bracket but still 1. ' maintain enough space between the bracket and sign so that there is the appearance of. two separate elements. DRB ACTION: Approved with recommendations noted above. SRA ACTION: Empire Clothing Empire Clothing would like to proceed with some exterior renovations. They would like to install an awning along the front of the building to close off the open section between the windows and the canopy. They tried to clean the area before, due to the invasion of-pigeons, but they were not discouraged and kept. coming back. It is hoped that this treatment will close off the area once and for r . all. The awning sample was submitted (red and beige) . The awning would be red -and—it would-.have a beige band across the full length of the awning. The Board felt that this would be a tremendous improvement. DRB ACTION: Approved G j SRA ACTION: � ) 10/4 The Board agreed that it should discuss the approach it will take in preparing an application for future proposals to come before the Design Review Board. It was noted that this should be scheduled as an agenda item for the next meeting on April 6. Respectfully submitted, Ethel C. Crowell Salem -• [redevelopment 44-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 7444580 MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD ON WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 16, 1983 On Wednesday, February 16, 1983, the members of the DRB met in open session at One Salem Green, Salem, Mass. , with the following members present: Chris Greene, Richard Minturn, John Wright and Fred Johnson. The following proposals were reviewed: Firehouse Coffee Shoppe - Church St. sign The original sign was damaged by a truck. The new sign is similar to the original sign with the exception of the word "BREAKFAST" added to the sign and the measurements are slightly smaller than the original sign. It was recommended by the Board that the roof line of the Firehouse emblem be redrawn in perspective to the tower. In regard to the method of attachment, it was • recommended that the sign be centered on the frieze as high as possible to prevent further damage to the sign. Red is the background color. The letters and trim around the letters will be ivory. Red, gray and black will be used on the firehouse emblem. DRB ACTION: Approved with recommended changes. SRA ACTION: Approved "A" Sun Tan Center - Power Block sign The telephone number noted on the proposed sign is to be deleted. The sign will be located over the doorway bay. It was recommended that the yellow, as proposed, should not be used. The Board would prefer to see the use of tan, light and dark brown and a thin edging of orange around "SUN TAN". The "A" is to be smaller than the other letters with a single quote around the 'A' . The DRB requested that the installation of the sign be compatible with other signs on the building, such as the "ONE BARTON SQUARE" sign. • DRB ACTION: Approved as recommended 11 SRA ACTION: Approved i MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD FEB. 16, 1983 Page 2 Chiropractor - Dr. Fantini, Central Plaza sign Dr. Fantini proposed to place the Chiropractor sign across the full span of his office space at Central Plaza. The Board recommended the letters be reduced in size and the letters should not be placed so far apart from each other. The Board felt the sign would be more readable if the letters were placed closer together. Two inch lettering on the front door was approved. Lettering on the back door, facing the fountain, with a notation that the entrance is on Central St. , was also approved. The Board recommended the use of Roman typeface letters and requested a submission of a shop drawing showing the letter style, as well as a sample color chip. A member of the Design Review Board will make a final review of the letter style and color. DRB ACTION: Approved subject to submission of the shop drawing and color chip SRA ACTION: Approved • Forrester's Corner - Stern Management Associates Robert Scagliotti presented a proposal for the use of the property located at the corner of Crombie and Norman St. Stern Mgmt. Assoc. would like to keep the existing building. They will remove the tower and will construct two additional units to blend in with the existing building. The proposed use for the entire building will be a small grocery store (White Hen) in the existing building and office, retail, commercial or mixed use in the two new units. The existing building will be cleaned up and rehabilitated. The DRB recommended that the proposal, as submitted, be restudied in regard to the end wall and the upper front section of the existing building. It was recommended that the use of brick in these two areas could tie the oolct and ,ne_w sectabnsctogether. fi All the landscape work will be done in such a way that it will screen off_the wheel sections of the parked cars. Questions were raised about the SRA's former commitment to do the site improvement work around the lot. The DRB noted that it is their hope the SRA will seriously consider going ahead with the site improvement work. The Board was advised that the owner of the property will have a multi-year lease with the grocery store chain. t� MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD FEB. 16, 1983 Page 3 It was agreed that there are still areas to study such as what type of signage will be used, how the awning and entrance is going to be resolved; if there is going to be a free standing sign, the treatment for the end wall and upper front portion of the original building, the landscaping treatment to bring the entire building together and the possibility of continuing the public greenway. It was noted that Mr. Baizen of Heritage Plaza does not seem to be in favor of the general public walking through his property. The architect, Robert Scagliotti, agreed to make changes in the proposal prior to submitting his preliminary plan to the SRA. DRB ACTION: Approved the preliminary plan with recommended changes. SRA ACTION: No action until the next SRA meeting March 7. Roosevelt's - Menu board for 300 Derby St. restaurant A sketch of the brick column with a cabinet set inside for menus was presented. The cabinet will be interior lit. After discussion, the Board agreed the top section should have a heavier • appearance. The bricks used for the column should match the restaurant brick work. It was agreed that if a new sketch is submitted, it will be reviewed by the Board on an individual basis. DRB ACTION: Resubmission required SRA ACTION: Approved Heritage Condo Fence - Norman St. f,y - ��L The Board reviewed the fence sample and recommended the twisted bars be eliminated, the bars should be asfar apart as,the City code will allow. The Board would like to know how Mr. Baizen is goipg to resolve the slope problem in the installation process. It was also recommended that the cross bar should be of a heavier material. DRB ACTION: Resubmission required SRA ACTION: No action necessary • Respectfully submitted Ethel C. Crowell Comments by Fred Johnson for DRB sign review Menu Board - Roosevelt's - all right as far as he is concerned One Barton Square - Disapproved - wants to know where the sign will be located on the building what colors will be used? disapproved the scroll work on the bracket what size bracket will be used 36" or 42" ? Chiropractor sign - approved /ichaud Tours - felt that the sign is too important and should go before the //// entire Board - should not be approved by a single decision. additional information needed. • Salem Redevelopment 900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744:580 MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD WEDNESDAY, JAN. 12, 1983 The members of the Design Review Board met for a meeting at One Salem Green on Wednesday, Jan. 12, 1983 with the following members present: John Wright , John Emerson, Richard Minturn and Fred Johnson. The following proposals were reviewed: 5-9 Summer Street - Heritage Plaza-West The future owner of the building at 5-9 Summer Street presented a renovation plan for the building (see attached scope of work) . The owner is planning to make a presentation to the Redevelopment Authority in hope of obtaining financial assistance to complete the renovation project. The plans call for part of the building to be used as a "Bed-Breakfast Inn" and the rest of the building will be used as studio apartments. The building has not had extensive renovations over the past, therefore, it should not be too difficult to return it to its original appearance as shown on the photo- graphs obtained from the Essex Institute. John Wright advised them that he would be happy to help them find other photo- graphs or needed information at the Institute. They would like to keep the area along the side of the building abutting the rear of the Theatre Building as an open area to be used as a drop off station for the Inn. This work could blend in with possible site work the SRA may be contemplating along Summer Street. The DRB fully agreed with the renovation plans for the building and felt that the proposed work would have a positive affect on the area, especially since Jerry's just completed its rehab work and recommends the SRA assist them in accomplishing the renovation project. i DRB ACTION: Approved the renovation concept. SRA ACTION: 222-226 Essex St. - Tinti,Quinn & Savoy, Attorneys & Travel World The Board reviewed the sketch presented for the glass door sign. The Board •. noted that there seems to be too much information on the doorway. It recommended the individual names be removed from the sign, leaving only the firm names. Too much MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD JAN. 12, 1983 Page 2 information is confusing. The DRB felt that the sketch is not appropriate to the design of a doorway that has a slick modern appearance. It suggested that the letter could be flush left and using a different/modern typeface. The "Travel World" sign should be separate from the "Lawyers" since it is a separate address (226 Essex St.) The Board agreed to have Fred Johnson review a revised sketch for the sign in order to save time since the SRA meeting will be Jan. 17. DRB ACTION: Resubmission to be reviewed by Fred Johnson prior to the SRA meeting. SRA ACTION: One Barton:.Square —..sign A sketch was presented for the Washington Street sign to be located flush to the front of the building. As recommended by the DRB at the last meeting, the owner changed the color from green to maroon and gold. They would like to have another sign -un the Barton Square side of the building since that is where the entrance is to the -Lounge. The Board recommended that the owner consider using a symbol (stein, or something similar to that) instead of just a sign. Barton Square needs something to liven up the area. It was also agreed that the Washington St. sign should have lighting similar to that used by Jerry's. DRB ACTION: Approved the Washington Street sign A. submission is needed for the Barton Sq. sign. SRA ACTION: i Respectfully submitted, Ethel C. Crowell