Loading...
1979-1982 DRB MEETING MINUTES DRB MINUTES 1979-1982 s I Salem Redevelopment 4-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744-4580 MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD WEDNESDAY, DEC. 15, 1982 The members of the DRB met for its regular meeting at One Salem Green, Salem, Mass. , with the following members present: John Emerson, Chris Green, Joy Cowan and John Wright. The following proposals were reviewed: Masonic Temple Staley McDermet advised the DRB that preliminary approval had been received for exterior work. The only changes since the preliminary approval has been the proposed. replacement of all windows, possibly with interior storm windows. The window situation is still being investigated. The transom windows will be replaced and the store front glass will be replaced with large panes of glass. The developers would like to have recessed doorways and keep the original main entrance as it is now. The ornamentation above the main • entrance will be removed but the main sign board (12 inch board) will remain over each store window. The DRB recommended that Staley McDermet investigate the photographs at the Essex Institute before making a final decision on the store fronts. A new delivery doorway will be installed between the Masonic Building and the Bridal Shoppe by demolishing the small existing building. They would like to change the look on Lynde Street. The Board recommended that a study be made of the Bridal Sfioppe'building and consider .keeping the same :window rhythm along Lynde Street. The middle window glass blocks and panels at the rear of the building will be retained. In'regard to the mechanical units, there will be three units installed on the high roof of the Masonic Building, which will not be visible, and one unit will be located on the Bridal Shoppe roof, which will be screened off.- The ff.The sample of the roof shingles for the Masonic Building was reviewed and approved by the DRB, DRB ACTION: Resubmission requested for building design - roof shingles approved. p. SRA ACTION: No action necessary MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD DEC. 15, 1982 i Page 2 Lobster Shanty - Arnold Pike A third proposal was submitted by the owner of the Lobster Shanty. It was noted that there are two issues, one is the taking up of space between the buildings, the other is the design of the building itself. Mr. Pike noted that the new plan is the result of the DRB's recommendation of a glass concept and he feels that it is one that everyone can live with. The Board was advised that the SRA and the Market Commission plans to meet on Jan. 3rd and they will discuss the future of the market area at this meeting. It was agreed that a member of the DRB will attend the meeting as well. The Board will then make a decision as to who has the responsibility for authorizing changes or additions in the market stall area. DRB ACTION: No action - the Board will wait until the matter is discussed at the SRA meeting. Curry Copy and Tobie's Jewelers - Power Block Building Curry Copy presented two signs for their new location in the Power Block. The signs will be the same logo as they had on their other store on Washington Street. DRB ACTION: Approved • SRA ACTION: Approved The owner of Tobie's Jewelers presented a sketch. The DRB recommended centering the letters on one line (13 sq. ft.) and the letters should be of the same thickness and design, especially the "Serif" letter form, and have a wide black trim, approximately 1/2 inch around the letters. DRB ACTION: Approved as recommended SRA ACTION: Approved Barton Square Lounge - Mr. DeCotis Mr. DeCotis did not have a formal presentation for his sign for the Barton Square Lounge. He noted that it would be similar to the old sign that they had and would like to use the same colors. The Board recommended that he consider a letter style that would be consistent with the overall look of the building and asked that he select a color for the sign that would be on the warmer end of the rainbow. DRB ACTION: Resubmission requested SRA ACTION: No action necessary. Heritage Plaza Condominiums - Norman St. Mr. Baizen notedthat he is required to install a railing along Norman Street to prevent someone from falling down the stairwell. It was noted that it would be MINUTES'OF THE DRB MEETING HELD DEC. 15, 1982 Page 3 • painted the same color as the trim on the building. The sketch presented did not seem to fit the style of the building. It was recommended that the railing should have some vertical element to off-set the length. It should also have something above the rail to prevent people from sitting on top of the railing or else the fence, as proposed, would defeat its purpose. DRB ACTION: Resubmission requested , SRA ACTION: No action required ie*ic it**ic h�k�t*4c�F Household. Finance - Salem Sign Co. The Board reviewed the proposed sign for the Washington Street building. After due consideration of the sign and the architecture of the building, it was agreed that the transom should be covered with the bronze panel and the sign is to be located on the frieze. DRB ACTION: Approved the installation of the sign on the frieze. SRA ACTION: Approved Preliminary drawings for Red's Sandwich Shop building on Front St. - Eric Rumpf The drawings as presented was for concept review only. John Emerson made his recommendations as follows: The next submission on the schematic level should show the building in context. Scaled elevation of the south side of Front Street should show Old Police Station and Clark and Friend buildings. Indicate by shadow rendering or by perspective the character of the building. The proposal submitted indicated a positive step on a conceptual level. DRB ACTION: Schematic plans requested. SRA ACTION: Approved Respectfully submitted, Ethel C. Crowell Zo 0m%d' /� G �� ale%MEE Redevelopment 44-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744-4580 MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 10, 1982 The members of the DRB met at One Salem Green, Salem, Mass. with the following members present: John Emerson, Richard Minturn, Joy Cowan and Chris Greene. The following proposals were reviewed: Lobster Shanty - Arnold Pike Councillor Stephen Lovely attended the meeting to advise the DRB that the Council is in favor of the extension of the market stall and the bathroom installa- tion. Mr. Pike has agreed to forego any additional seating capacity due to the objections made by Beef & Oyster and Folsom's and he did agree to scale down the building. C. Greene noted that the DRB is concerned about the plans for the Salem News addition. The space next to the Lobster Shanty is a very important visual area and we have to think of what it will look like. Mr. Pike noted that he talked to Alan Gable of the Newsrand he can see no problem with the proposed plan. Mr. Pike also stated that they need a place in the restaurant for customers to wait. The arrangement made to use the bathrooms at the Old Town Hall did not work out when people are inside the restaurant. The bathrooms will be mainly for customers and market stall owners. Mr. Pike emphasized the fact that they need bathrooms to stay in business since the City requires them to remain open all year round. The Board discussed the location for the planter which will have to be taken out to make room for the addition. Mr. Pike agreed to put it on a truck but could not make a decision as to where it should be relocated. Chris Greene noted that there is no place in the market area for the planter. It should be stored away by the City until it is decided where it should go. It 3s an expensive piece of material. DRB ACTION: Approved the plan as shown. The Board would want to retain the jog in the building. The City should be encouraged to put in some plantings in the corner between the new addition and the "News" building. A birch tree would be appropriate without the concrete and recommends that the planter be stored or used somewhere else. SRA ACTION: No action taken by the SRA until further informatio is received • MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD NOV. 10, 1982 Page 2 Roosevelt's - sign Salem Sign Co. presented a new sign to be installed on the Derby Street side of the building - ROOSEVELT's 300 DERBY STREET They would use the same letters from the old 300 DERBY STREET sign, colors are sand and brown. DRB ACTION: Approved SRA ACTION: Approved Menu box for Roosevelt's The Board did not take action on the landscape plan since they felt that it was incomplete and no one attended the meeting to answer various questions that Board had on landscaping. Although the Board approved the basic layout, there was concern about the amount and scale of planting. There was even more concern after the Board was • advised that there are other plans being drawn to show the possible use of a glass awning. This would also effect the landscaping plan. The owners should have some sense of tying in the plan with the contingent possibilities for that site. The DRB would also like to know more about the parking area treatment and curbing if that is. to .be a temporary use of the site. In regard to the menu box, the Board agreed that the menu box is too large for a pedestrian sign, the design scale is inappropriate. The DRB is requested resubmission. The design for the menu box should be plain, simple and the appropriate height for pedestrians and should be designed to relate to the building. The Board would also like to have more detail on the contents of what is to be placed inside the menu box. DRB ACTION: Resubmission required SRA ACTION: No action necessary. Household Finance .- Salem Sign Co. Paul Fannell proposed a new sign for Household Financial Center - two sections 18 inches by 6 feet and a 36 inch square logo sign. They will remove the original sign and try to expose the transom. • The Board approved the sign location on the frieze. The transom area should be restored. If this is not practical, it will be taken up at the next meeting. The Board will allow a slight reduction in the sign to expose part of the frieze. DRB ACTION: Approved as noted above SRA ACTION: Approved Salem • Redevelopment 44-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744-4580 MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD OCTOBER 13, 1982 On Wednesday, October 13, 1982, the members of the Design Review Board met at One Salem Green, Salem, Mass. with the following members present: John Emerson, Joy Cowan and Richard Minturn. The following proposals were discussed. Power Building The color sample for the columns, lintels paneling and watertable were reviewed: Hancock Paints - Moorland - 4 -18P - Paneling Hancock Paints - Neutral W - 4 - 9M - Lintel and columns Olympic Stain - Beige Gray - Watertable Doors - Oak Stain with polyurethane seal. • The Board also reviewed the proposed fence (3 sided) to screen the heat pump equipment for the Power Block. In order to keep continuity, the fence will be the same style as the parking lot fence around the condominiums (cedar pickets with a cap on top) . The only difference will be the fact that the air circulation is needed for the heat pump and the picket spacing will be slightly wider than the adjacent fencing. It was also' noted that an enclosure will be needed for the dumpster. This will be submitted' at another meeting. The DRB noted that either the owner or the .architect should submit to the DRB guidelines for sign control for the Power Block. DRB ACTION: Approved the color samples submitted for the columns, lintels, paneling, .watertable and doors. Shadow box (fence for heat pump) was also approved. SRA ACTION: Approved Roosevelt's The SRA approved to allow the free standing menu box. The DRB reviewed the comments made by the SRA in regard to the conditional approval. No action was taken on the matter due to the fact that approval was conditioned on submission of alternative sketches for site improvement work. To date the owner of the restaurant • has not submitted material for review. Respectfully submitted, Ethel C. Crowell Salem Redevelopment 44-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744-4580 L ' MEETING OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 1982 The Members of the Design Review Board met at One Salem Green, Salem, Mass. with the following members present: Joy Cowan, John Emerson, John Wright, Fred Johnson, Richard Minturn. The following proposals were reviewed. Power Block - Robert Scagliotti The Board was advised that the owner has gone back to the original plan for the first floor treatment of the Power Block building. The only change would be v for the Barton Lounge door which presently calls for a wooden door. The owner of the Lounge would like to install glass panels. All store entrances will remain flush to the street with the exception of the one store that is presently recessed. They will retain the 450 corner on the section near the Joshua Ward House. • The fascia will be covered and cleaned up. There will be a sign board installed below the lintel. The columns and lintels will be painted similar to the color of the Joshua Ward House trim (cream color) . The store front trim will be painted a little darker beige to bring out the individuality of the stores. DRB ACTION: Approved final drawings - color sample to be submitted. SRA ACTION: Approved Masonic Temple - _Staley McDermet Staley McDermet noted that they would like to change the roof line by adding an additional four feet. This would screen off the mechanical equipment from public view and also give the Masons a higher ceiling for the Lodge (20 ft.) . The appearance of the building should be such that it has a flat roof. The pitched roof is not visible, which was the intent of the original design. The Board approved the roof configuration for a maximum height of 78.5 ft. DRB ACTION: Approved roof configuration SRA ACTION: Approved roof configuration MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING - Sept. 13, 1982 Page 2 • Pickering Oil Co. - sign - Central Plaza The sign proposed is the logo for Pickering Oil Co. The Board questioned whether or not the sign is to be illuminated. If this is so, resubmission is required. It is the Board's understanding that there is to be one sign "Pickering Oil Co." along the face of the building and another sign painted on the door. The Board approved the lettering on the entrance door only. DRB ACTION: Approved as noted above SRA ACTION: Approved as recommended Roosevelt's - menu sign It was proposed to locate a free standing menu sign in the restaurant parking area, on the Derby St. side. The sign is to be made of wood, the base is cast iron poles. The owner felt that there is not enough foot traffic along Central St. to • warrant placing a menu box on the building itself. He would like to capture the traffic coming from Pickering Wharf. The DRB noted that a free standing sign is not allowed within the urban renewal area and that this would be a matter for the SRA to discuss. The SRA should deal only with the matter of whether or not a free standing sign is to be allowed and need not be concerned with the design factor at this time. DRB ACTION: Referred to the SRA SRA ACTION: Standing sign approved on condition of other site improvements to be made i.e. landscaping or other items to be submitted for approval. Jerry's - sign and panels Paul Fannell of the Salem Sign Co. proposed to install an acrylic panel, with a cap, onto the back of the clothing bins which would cover the plywood panels in the windows facing Essex St. On the acrylic panels there will be red letters to identify the articles for sale, i.e. SHOES, JEANS, TOWELS, etc. Richard Minturn noted that the Board concurs with the intent of the acrylic panel which is to minimize the use of other temporary signage in the windows. Mr. Fannell submitted a proposal for a projecting sign 3 ft x 4 ft to be placed • above the metal cornice. The sign would be internally lit. The letters would be 6 inch letters to match the existing letters on the building. In regard to the need for another sign, it was noted by the Board that the existing sign against the building is for motorists rather than pedestrian oriented. •MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD SEPT. 13, 1982 Page 3 After discussion the Board noted that the sign is too large and should be 2ft. x 3 ft and located below the fascia (one bay east of the 450 angle on the building) . It was also suggested that the matter of using banners be discussed with Mr. Rich. New sketches, with building elebations, be submitted at the next meeting. DRB ACTION: Approved the acrylic paneling for the Essex St. windows Resubmission requested for the projecting sign. SRA ACTION: Approved the paneling for the Essex St. windows 8-26 Front St. - storm windows The Board discussed the use of exterior storm windows, as requested by the SRA. R. Minturn noted that he can go along with the hardship part of the problem. They have HVAC system and they are not bringing in fresh air. The tenants like to open the windows. • The Board questioned the fact as to whether or not they are going to put storm windows on the first floor. The Board approved the color for the window and sash to be either Putnam Ivory or Pittsfield Buff and that the fixed windows on the first floor are not to have exterior storm windows. The-Board noted that the SRA Board should, at the point of reversing the DRB's recommendation, postpone taking any action and.request a member of the DRB attend its meeting to explain the DRB's course-of action. DRB ACTION: Approved color for window and sash SRA ACTION: Approved the colors selected Respectfully submitted, Ethel C. Crowell Salem Redevelopment 44-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744 -4580 MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD AUGUST 11, 1982 On Wednesday, August 11, 1982, the Design Review Board met with the following members present: Richard Minturn, Fred Johnson and Joy Cowan. The following proposals were reviewed: Lighting for the Norman Street Bridal Shoppe The Board felt that installing lights on a building of this type would be inappropriate and a letter is to be sent to the owner of the building and request that he meet with the Board in order to obtain further information about the lights and discuss alternatives. DRB ACTION: No action taken The Salem Evening News addition for Front Street The original plan for the new addition was modified in accordance with recommendations made by the DRB at the last meeting. The model showed a deeper arcade along the Front Street section, and new windows were added to the third level on the market area side. The architects noted that they would like to start construction by the 20th of September. It was also stated that they intend to install all glass on the Front Street entrance doorway. The DRB approved the schematics. Construction drawings are to be submitted for approval. DRB ACTION: Approved schematics SRA ACTION: Approved _Father Matthew building - Essex St. • DRB. The contractor submitted plans for the doorway and the stairway for review by the MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD AUG. 11, 1982-Page 2 The Board was advised that the developer is trying to reproduce the original doorway as close as possible since the original doorway is on exhibit at the Essex Institute. They would like to install a fence on line with the stairway. The Board also noted that a new widow's walk has been installed to screen the air-conditioning units. DRB ACTION: Approved the doorway, fence and widow's walk SRA ACTION: Approved **s* HISTORIC SALEM, INC. - pedestrian/tourist map A revised map was submitted based on study and discussions held with members of the DRB. The map will be located in ten different locations within the City. The maps are mainly for tourists to orient themselves where they are and what they can see in the particular area. • After review, it was agreed to have a heavy line at the top and bottom of the sign; change the type face for "Salem, 1982, The Best of Salem" to Palatino Roman typeface; copyright information, "Best of Salem, Inc." is to be relocated to the lower area under the "Key"; all street names are to be the same typeface as shown on "New Derby Street" (all caps); in the credit line "Salem Rediscovered" should replace "Historic Markers" on both sides. "Salem and Key" should be placed flush left. "Less travelled streets" is to be omitted. The credit line should read "Salem Rediscovered, a Community Project sponsored by Historic Salem, Incorporated and City of Salem." DRB ACTION: Approved the map with changes noted SRA ACTION: Approved Salem Beauty Supply A sketch of the sign was submitted. Material - W plywood - sign is to be painted and covered with three coats of polyurethane. The color sample submitted by the sign maker was not the true color. It was requested that a true color sample be submitted and will be reviewed by Richard Minturn. DRB ACTION: Approved subject to resubmission of color sample and approval by R. Minturn. Note: R. Minturn reviewed and approved the color sample Aug. 19, 1982 SRA ACTION: Approved I • MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD AUG. 11, 1982-Page 3 Storm Windows for 8-26 Front Street Building Gary Simon, the new owner of the building, would like to install energy efficient storm windows on the entire building. A sample of the windows was shown to the DRB, as well as the tint film that he would like to have installed on the windows on the South side. The window trim would be painted to match the window. Richard Minturn stated that this is an important matter and the Board should delay taking any action until such time as a meeting is scheduled for the full Board to discuss the subject. A special meeting will be scheduled. DRB ACTION: No action taken (see additional noted below) The SRA Board felt that this matter should be considered again SRA ACTION:` at .the next DRB meeting. Respectfully submitted, • Ethel C. Crowell 8-26 Front Street (special meeting) John Emerson and Richard Minturn met to further discuss the window treatment. It was agreed that the new owner should seriously explore the possibility.of putting the storm windows on the inside, or, instead, it was suggested either using a wooden storm window with divided lights or use an aluminum storm window and mount on interior (standard type) which would be less expensive. i Salem Redevelopment -6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 0970 TELEPHONE 744-4580 MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD WEDNESDAY, JULY 14, 1982 i The members of the DRB met at One Salem Green, Salem, Mass. on Wednesday, July 14, 1982. The following members were present: John Emerson, John Wright, Richard Minturn and Chris Greene. The fallowing proposals were reviewed: The Beverly-Peabody Times - sign for 133 Washington Street The SRA Board referred the sign back to the DRB for review. After review of the sketch submitted the DRB recommended that the spacing and alignment for the telephone numbers should be the same as the letters above. The Board noted that the size of the sign should be no larger than the sketch submitted. If the sign is to be painted any larger than the sketch submitted, it is to be resub- mitted to the DRB. It is also recommended that the sign be at eye level and will be the same typeface used on the newspaper heading. • DRB ACTION: Approved subject to recommendations noted. SRA ACTION: Approved with conditions noted above. Connelly's Candies - Awning Connelly's Candies installed an awning without DRB approval. The Board agreed to inspect the awning before the next DRB meeting. DRB ACTION: No action necessary SRA ACTION: No action necessary The Board noted that the owners of Larry's Famous Hot Dogs placed another sign on the market stall building without approval. The Board felt that the sign is inappropriate and unwarranted and that the Market Agent should be advised that the area is becoming cluttered with signs. The Board requested the SRA send a letter to the Market Commission requesting removal of the additional sign. MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD JULY 14, 1982 Page 2 • Salem Chamber of Commerce - sign at Old Town Hall It is proposed to install the sign on the Old Town Hall building. The sign will be the same sign used by the Chamber of Commerce at its former location on Derby St. The sign is woo&, carved letterspainted with gold leaf, on a painted black background, to be- placed over the two windows to the right of the doorway. Questions were raised as to whether or not the word "Salem" is needed on the sign. The Board was advised that this is Wt it legal name. DRB ACTION: Approved as submitted SRA ACTION: Approved Historic Salem Incorporated - signs Carolyn Tolles noted that the DRB did approve the front portion of the sign and at that time the Board requested resubmission for the back portion of the sign showing the directional map and the "Old Salem Map." The Board recommended the 'Old Salem Map" be centered within the lower portion • of the poster board. The words Historic Salem Incorporated - City of Salem should be changed to read "Historic Salem Incorporated and the City of Salem" and 'should be noted on both sides of the sign. Also, the same type face used on the front (DERBY SQUARE) should be used on the back heading for "SALEM" and "LEGEND." The Board felt that vehicular information noted on the map is not really needed since the map is mainly for pedestrian traffic. Its function is to identify where you are at the present time. It was also suggested that minor streets should be noted on the map. After discussion of the various elements needed on the map, , the Board felt that the whole matter should be restudied and Historic Salem Inc. should contact someone who would-be more familiar with setting up a directional map and resubmittal is requested. DRB ACTION: No action necessary - resubmittal requested SRA ACTION: No action necessary �**�F�tic ic�F**�kic ic��ic�t Las Brisas - sign The Board requested the owner submit a sample of the letters to be used on the sign. The owner noted that the letters to be used on the sign are the original • letters used by the former restaurant owner (Bistro Lebistingo) with the exception of the letter "A" that has to be made. After review the Board recommended that the "A" in the sign should be reworked to conform to the same letter style as the other letters in the sign. MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD JULY 14, 1982 Page 3 • DRB ACTION: Approved subject to the letter "A" being reworked as marked up by Chris Greene. SRA ACTION: Approved Salem Evening News - new addition The Salem Evening News is proposing a new addition in front of the new press building (Front St.) to house the administrative offices. A new three story brick building facing Front Street is being proposed with a narrow arcade treatment along Front Street and along the side nearest the market stall area. The arcade along the side of the building is subject to change. The "News" will need 19,000 sq. ft. of new space and will remodel the old building for leasing purposes. A connection will be made to the press building. The entrance will be on Front Street in close proximity to the original "News" building. The architect felt that this entrance would be more appropriate than having the doorway close to the Market area. , The Board was advised that the addition planned by the Lobster Shanty should be considered carefully by the SRA Board due to the fact that the window treatment on the market stall side of the new building has a critical bearing on the open • view of the surrounding area. Chris Green noted that the proposed arcade on the north side of the building presents problems in regard to winter conditions and pedestrian traffic. All Board Members agreed with the design concept. The architects noted that the presentation is strictly preliminary. They have tried to follow the roof lines and other elements from surrounding buildings and also tried to respect the sidewall of. the McDougall building. The "News" has not seen the model presented to the Board today. Possibly after they have had a chance to review the plan, changes will be made and will be re- submitted to the DRB. It is anticipated that final schematics will be submitted at the Aug. DRB meeting since the "News" is anxious to get going. DRB ACTION: Approved the concept and requested submission of final schematics SRA ACTION: No action necessary - to be resubmitted Salem Theatre -Elaine Finbury Elaine Finbury advised the Board that they will be leasing the vacant area once utilized by the restaurant (left of the theatre entrance) . The area is to be . totally redone. New glass windows will be installed. It was suggested that colored panels be used to match the burgundy tiles along the theatre entrance. Signage and materials will be submitted at a later meeting. DRB ACTION: Approved the proposed treatment SRA ACTION: Approved SaleM . • Redevelopment 44-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744-4580 MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD WEDNESDAY, JUNE 9, 1982 On Wednesday, June 9, 1982, the members of the Design Review Board met with the following members present: Chris Greene, Richard Minturn, John Emerson and Joy Cowan. The following proposals were reviewed: TravZ World - Sign The Travel World sign is to be located on the corner of the second floor of the Khouri building. It is the logo sign for Travel World with blue lettering, a green globe and white background. The Board recommended that the background should be bone white as opposed to stark white. The sign will be located on the corner of the building and will be bolted • to the brick. DRB ACTION: Approved SRA ACTION: Approved Jerry's - .sign Mr. Paul Pannell noted that Jerry Rich would like to have a second sign for "Jerry's Army and Navy Store" sign. The Board felt that the Army and Navy sign would not be in keeping with the building. John Emerson stated that with this particular building some type of signage would be necessary looking at the building from Essex/Washington Street. This was just a preliminary discussion in regard to the sign. Mr. Pannell will come back with other ideas for the next DRB meeting. DRB ACTION: No action necessary 0 MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD JUNE 9, 1982 Page 2 • Masonic Temple - Staley McDermet Staley McDermet noted that there is a proposal out for Zampell Bros. to buy the building and the Masons will remain in the building on the 5th floor. The plans call for the restoration of the building facades. They will try to bring back the original 9 over 9 windows. The first floor store fronts will be the same as the card shop. The original roof line was not to be seen from the street. This might have to change. The plan is to have three floors of office space, first floor commercial space and the fifth floor will be maintained by the Masons. More definite plans will be presented at the next meeting. DRB ACTION: No action necessary Lobster Shanty Addition - Market Area The owner of the Lobster Shanty would like to put on an addition which will be built with the same construction material as the existing building. • The Board agreed to take a field trip to the market area. After review of the building, the Board agreed on the concept but asked that the building be set back as far as possible toward the Salem News property. DRB ACTION: Approved SRA ACTION: No action taken by the Board - requested meeting with Market Commission Newmark Building - Rear Doorway The Board made a field trip to the site to look at the doorway design. DRB ACTION: Approved as submitted SRA ACTION: Approved MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD JUNE 9, 1982 Page 3 • Landscape Plan for Heritage Plaza-West - Washington Norman and Barton Sq. The main improvements for the area will be mainly trees, hedges, sidewalks and it is planned to have a curb cut with a cobblestone ramp along Barton Sq. Dunkin Donuts will have a new pedestrian entrance. The Board recommended a restudy of the location of the Dunkin Donuts pedestrian entrance. They feel that the hedges will be trampled by the pedestrian traffic. The driveway between Lappin's building will be repaved and Mr. Lappin has agreed to open up the storefronts along Barton Square. Plantings will be installed along Crombie St. New curbing along Mr. Baizen's Norman Street sidewalk will also be installed. DRB ACTION: Approved SRA ACTION: Approved. Heritage Condos - Norman St./Barton Sq. 0 Mr. Baizen requested approval for lighting fixtures for the parking area and pedestrian areas. The original proposal for the pedestrian area will not give off enough light. The new sphere lights will be an opaque light on an 8' 8" pole to light up the seating area and the parking area. The walkway beyond Dunkin Donuts should be lit up. The light could be mounted on the side of the building. Mr. Baizen noted that he will have to have a slim coat of stucco placed on the foundation to match the masonry work. The color of the foundation cement does not match well at all. The fence will be stained Beechwood Gray (Cabot Stain) . DRB ACTION: Approved SRA ACTION: Approved Respectfully submitted, Ethel C. Crowell SalemMu Redevelopment TELEPHONE 744-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 744-4580 MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD WEDNESDAY, MAY 19, 1982 The Members of the Design Review Board met for a regular meeting with the following members present: John.F. Collins, John Wright and Chris Greene. The following proposals were reviewed: Power Building The Board was provided with a preliminary plan for the first and second floors of the Power B1ock. . LThe owner has agreed to do additional work then was originally noted in the first plan. The Board was advised that the original windows would be retained and the original brick work under the stucco will also remain. DRB ACTION: Approved the Preliminary Plan • (Approved the Preliminary Plan as presented - revisions made after SRA ACTION:[DRB reviewed the drawing - revisions will be submitted to DRB Father Matthew . Carriage House The Board was provided with a preliminary plan for the Carriage House. It was noted that the air conditioning units on the roof will be screened off with a balustrade .. John Wright noted that the balustrade should be made similar 'to that on the Gardner Peabody House. The siding has to comply with the Fire District Codes. DRB ACTION: Approved the preliminary plan SRA ACTION: Approved Newmark Building - Light fixture (rear wall) The Board reviewed the security light fixture proposed for the rear wall of the • Newmark building. They propose to use three lights as opposed to the 5 lights. The architect tried to match the lights used in Central Plaza. John Collins noted that it would be beneficial to inspect the proposed location to make sure the lights do not reflect into one ,of the adjacent apartments. Approved: The SRA Board DRB: Approved the light fixture SRA ACTION: suggested the lights be placed low so as not to reflect on the abutting building. MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD MAY 19, 1982 Page 2 • Lally's building (second floor '- banner) The owner of the new second floor store, The Dancer's Partner, proposed a; banner on an anodized aluminum pole for the second floor level. After discussion relative to the use of the ballet shoes and the placement of the letters, it was agreed that a new sketch would be submitted separating the two items of identification. The Board agreed to review the new sketch as soon as it is submitted. DRB ACTION: Approved concept. Resubmission requested Note: Revised drawing was resubmitted and reviewed by DRB Member John Wright. A recommendation was made to bring the string holding the ballet shoes higher .to fill in the empty space. SRA ACTION: Approved the revised drawing Sundays Ice Cream - T. R. Kerr building The Board reviewed the sketch of the carved, gold leaf letters (Sundays Ice Cream) with a raised symbol of the ice-cream cone. • The Board recommended the white background be removed around the ice-cream cone. The Board seemed to feel that the cone would be more outstanding this way. DRB ACTION: Approved the sign concept. Requested resubmission of the sign which will be reviewed by the DRB as soon as possible. Note: John Wright reviewed and approved the revised sketch submitted. SRA ACTION: Approved Salem Theatre A plan was submitted showing the facade work for the commercial section of the building. The Board had difficulty relating to the drawing submitted showing the use of various colors, since the owner of the Theatre stated that she intended to use only black and white. The Board requested that a new presentation be made showing the black and white treatment but requested that she consider using colors. DRB ACTION: Resubmission requested SRA ACTION: No action necessary • MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD MAY 19, 1982 Page 3 Sack Theatre - East India Mall The owners of the Sack Theatre operation submitted a preliminary concept for the East India Mall sign on the Church Street side of the building. , Various variations of the sign were considered. The Board did not approve the use of one large sign to be attached to the wooden sections of the garage. The DRB felt strongly that the sign band should be utilized and came up with the solution that the sign could stretch out along the 36 ft. band section instead of using one large sign. The theatre owners agreed to submit a revised plan. Note: A new drawing was submitted just prior to the SRA meeting. DRB ACTION: Approved the concept - resubmission requested SRA ACTION: Approved by the SRA subject to DRB approval. Benjamin's - Derby Square (formerly Chuck's) • A sketch was submitted and reviewed. It was recommended that the letters be relocated to fit on one line and to raise the letters to balance off the top and bottom sections of the sign. DRB ACTION: Approved concept - resubmission requested SRA ACTION: Approved the original presentation, spacing to be corrected - no signature by the sign maker to be on the sign. Heritage Condo's - Norman Street It was noted by Mr. Baizen that he would like to install a pool area for the tenants' use. The Board tried to discourage this idea. It was the Board's feeling that the selected area would not be conducive to use by all the tenants and the tenants adjacent to the pool might strongly object to the noise, and the area could be put to better use. The Board discussed the landscaping needs. The Board recommended that Mr. Baizen condense the parking area to allow room for additional trees. It was his feeling that the total area has too much asphalt and not enough landscaping to soften the site and,to provide a better view for the occupants of the building. DRB ACTION: Disapproved the pool concept - resubmission requested. • Approved fence type (similar to Stern/Tise fence on Federal St.) SRA ACTION: No action necessary Respectfully submitted Ethel C. Crowell I A X SSalem Redevelopment 44-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744 -4580 MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD APRIL 14, 1982 On Wednesday, April 14, 1982, the members of the Design Review Board met in open session at One Salem Green with the following members present: Fred Johnson, Chris Greene and John Wright. The following presentations were reviewed: Heritage West Condominiums - Gerry Baizen Paint samples for the air conditioning grilles were reviewed. The Board approved the use of the architectural grille style painted a brick tone to blend in with the surrounding brick work. The developer proposed to use the Brosco Steel Door (F-70) with the inverted panel for use on the townhouse building only. • Light fixtures for the parking area, pedestrian walkway and building doorways were reviewed and approved. The walkway lights are similar to the.Essex Mall fixtures. Exterior building lights will be installed on the townhouse building only. The Board noted they would prefer to see clear glass and bulbs on the entrance lights. Mr. Baizen noted that he is looking into various ways to light up the front of the building along Norman Street. Sample fixtures will be presented for approval. Mr. Baizen noted, for the benefit of the corner tenants, he would like to install a 6 ft. screening fence from the corner of the Dunkin Donuts property extending out to the Norman Street property in order to screen the view of the Dunkin Donut property. DRB ACTION: Approved - architectural grille, painted brick tone; light fixtures for walkways, parking areas and doorways; door style; fence along Dunkin Donut property line. SRA ACTION: Approved Cafe Jerusalem - Central Plaza sign The owner submitted a sample of the sign to be hung below the first brick course under the arcade. Letter style - Libra The Board recommended the sign be made larger (2 ft. x 3 ft) gold carved letters on mahogany stained background. • DRB ACTION: Approved SRA ACTION: Approved y MINUES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD APRIL 14, 1982 Page 2 • Dunkin Donuts - Washington Street - sign The owner of Dunkin Donuts on Washington Street would like to change the existing free standing sign. The regional sales representative, William Rianhard, presented sample brochures of the 10 and 12 ft. aluminum poles and the 3 and 4 ft. logo sign for the top of the poles. Mr. Rianhard was advised that free standing signs are not allowed within the urban renewal area. The SRA's Project Administrator advised the Board that he will talk to Mr. Marino about the sign replacement. DRB ACTION: No action necessary. Plant Lady - Clare Garrett - Derby St. The owner proposes to install an awning along the face of the building at 288 Derby St. The owner felt strongly that the building, and her business, needs a vibrant color to attract attention. The color chosen (green) by the owner disturbed the Board since it is a color that would extend along the full length of the building which they felt would be too much of a span of one color. It was recommended that the span be broken up with • another shade of gree. The owner would not agree to this arrangement. She felt that she has a lot to contend with, in regard to the signs across the street and that the building needs strong recognition. The Board agreed to take a walk down to the site to see how the color relates to the brick work and the building in general. DRB ACTION: No action taken Note: Chris Greene and John Wright telephone their approval of the awning SRA ACTION: Approved Michael - Roberts - Hair Fashions - awning/canopy The owners proposed a new awning and canopy for the Essex Street facade. The color of the awning and canopy is to be plain maroon with white lettering. After discussion on the number of items allowed on a sign, it was agreed that the sign would have "Michael Roberts - Men - Women Hair Fashions" with the address printed on the awning. DRB ACTION: Approved SRA ACTION: Approved • ' MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD APRIL 14, 1982 Page 3 Las Brisas - Front o t St. - sign The owner requested he be allowed to replace the Bistro Lebistingo letters on the existing sign with his own lettering for Las Brisas. The Board was not provided with a sample of the letters to be used and requested the Owner bring in a sample for the Board's review. DRB ACTION: No action necessary Life Sports - East India Mall - sign The proposed sign for Life Sports was reviewed. The Board recommended that the placement of the sport symbol (5 rings) and the line separating the store name, be reversed on the sign board. DRB ACTION: Approved as recommended SRA ACTION: Approved as recommended YMCA - Sewall St. - sign The YMCA is renovating its entrance on Sewall Street. They are replacing the existing door with a new bronze trim, glass door. A new "Y" logo will be placed over the entrance. Further detail drawings will be submitted for the treatment of the entire first level at a later meeting. DRB ACTION: Approved as submitted SRA ACTION: Approved Respectfully submitted, Ethel C. Crowell r Salem MM Redevelopment 44-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744-4580 MINUTESIAF"THE' MEETING-OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD MARCH 17, 1982 On Wednesday, March 17, 1982, the Design Review met at One Salem Green, Salem, Mass. , with the following members present: John Emerson, Richard Minturn, and Chris Green. Ralph Khouri —front entrance - 266 Essex Street Plans submitted by Walter R. Ewaschuk. DRB ACTION: Approved as submitted. SRA ACTION: Approved Marine Model Gallery Sign - Front Street • Plan by Brian Hanlon. DRB ACTION: Approved as submitted. SRA ACTION: Approved Universal Gym - Salem Laundry Building The sign is allowed to be hung below the second floor window, centered above the entrance, in the middle of the spundrel. The sign letters should be painted with white paint or flat acrylic to remove glossy appearance. The owner agrees to coordinate an entrance sign with other tenants, perhaps in a business directory. The owner also agrees to remove an illegal lighted sign now hanging in^one of the windows on the second floor. Approved * * * **** * * * * Ask Mr. Fosters- 30 Federal Street Ask Mr. Foster has moved from the Masonic Temple to the new office condo complex at the corner of Washington and Federal Streets. The DRB approves the use of the existing projecting sign, to be mounted • on the southern facade, midway between the corner downspout and the window, the top of sign to be level with :the top of the first floor window trim. Approved ** * * * *** * MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD MARCH 17, 1982 Page 2 Stairway - 220-226 Essex Street Approved drawing dated 3/17/82 by Staley McDermet, except for paving area in front, awaiting comment from John Collins. DRB ACTION: Approved SRA ACTION: Approved Jerry's - 301 Essex St. The existing brick wall under the window on the west facade can remain. Pratt and Lambert Old Red (R159R) is approved by trim. DRB ACTION: Approved SRA ACTION: Approved • Life Sports Sign - East India Mall The sign as submitted was approved by the SRA Board Note: To be reaffirmed by the DRB at its next meeting. Respectfully submitted, Christopher G. Olney Salem Redevelopment 44-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744-4580 MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD FEB. 10, 1982 On Wednesday, February 10, 1982, the Design Review Board met at One Salem Green, Salem, Mass. , with the following members present: John Wright, John Emerson, and Chris Green. Sawtell's - 133 Washington Street The new owner of Sawtell's would like to install a security light at the rear entrance since a number of people will be using that entrance to the second floor. They tried to match the City fixtures used in the same area and found one that is as close as possible (Keene fixture #543-350MM with a 535 Lexan Shield) . They did look at the Beef & Oyster House fixture, as recommended by the Boardabut felt that the light would not be adequate. The Board had no objection to the installation and recommended that the lights • be located just beyond the canopy, centered between the first and second floor windows. DRB ACTION: Approved SRA ACTION: Approved Universe Gym - Salem Sign Co. The Board reviewed the sketches submitted by Salem Sign Company. It was recommended that they use "Helvetica" type letters. Individual letters to be located straight across above the arch on the Central Street side of the building. The Board disapproved the larger sign with the 'letters arched above the figure of a man. Note: After telephone discussion with the owner of the Gym it was agreed that he would resubmit the proposed sign. No action required • r •MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD FEB. 10, 1982 Page 2 • Heritage Condominiums - Norman St./Barton Square The developer is requesting approval for changes in the construction plan due to the fact that the Electric Company is insisting on installing a switch box ( 3 ft. x 4 ft.) on a concrete slab which will be located along the Washington Street end of the building. The developer plans to landscape around the switch box to soften its appearance. This box is for emergency purposes. A transformer is also shown on the plan, located at one of the rear entrances in Barton Square. The Board recommended that this transformer be relocated, possibly under one of the trees, and screened with landscaping. In this way the small landscaped area near the doorway would not be spoiled by the appearance of the transformer. A preliminary landscaping plan was submitted for the Board's review. The Board had no objection to the plan presented. It was recommended that a copy of the plan be forwarded to John Collins for his review and comments. The developer presented a new unit plan for the end units facing Washington St. which includes window installation. The Board had no objection to this plan change and also recommended that the develop consider installing windows on 'the top level facade to provide for natural light as well as a spectacular view of the City. • DRB ACTION: Approved the new unit plan for the Washington St. end of the building; the installation of the switch box and new location for the transformer. SRA ACTION: Approved Respectfully submitted, Ethel C. Crowell Salem • Redevelopment 44-6900 ,authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744 -4580 MINUTESOF THE MEETING OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD JANUARY 13, 1982 Y 1 The Members of the Design Review Board met on January 13, 1982 with the following members present: John Emerson, Fred Johnson, John Wright and Richard Minturn. s The following proposals were reviewed: Power Block; 118 Washington Street f Final;7plans for the rehabilitation of the lower portion of the Power Block was submitted for approval. It was proposed to remove the stucco, remove the signs, repair, caulk and clean existing windows, replace windows to match where necessary. The SRA will oversee the construction work. There is a possibility that more detail will be uncovered when the signs are • removed. The Board felt that this piece meal approach will not do justice to the building. There should be some assurance from the owner that he will do something about doing more work on the rest of the storefronts at some future time. The SRA's Project Administrator stated that he would be happy to talk to the owner about working on the entire commercial area. DRB ACTION: The Board agreed in principal with the proposed work presented. The Board deferred final approval and recommended to explore the feasibility and cost of rehabilitating the commercial store fronts on Washington Street. SRA ACTION: Approved the DRB's recommendation since the delay would not jeopardize the housing project. Father Matthew Building - 129 Essex Street Final plans dated 11/18/81 were submitted for approval. A request was made at the previous meeting that the developer restudy the side entrance. The side entrance has been reduced in scale. The brick panel, constructed with new brick, for the DRB's inspection is ready. The Board agreed to make an inspection after the meeting. The developer noted that the main difficulty they had in trying to match the brick work was in obtaining the right size. . The Board noted that they would like to see more detail on the front entrance before it is installed, as well as paint colors. The Board was advised that the entrance would be a duplication of the original since the Essex Institute will not release the original doorway. DRB ACTION: Approved SRA ACTION: Approved ***ttt M Y MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD JAN. 13, 1982 Page 2 • Stairway between Khouri's building and Connelly's store on Essex St. Staley McDermet submitted a model showing the proposed construction for the stairway between the buildings. The Board noted that they would prefer to have glass in the bottom panel. The stairway should be downlighted at night so that the light is not directed across the Mall to another building. The handrail and baluster should be of a plain design. Another area of concern was the landscaping treatment for the open space abutting the Essex Mall. The Board approved the proposal to have the roof line lower than the two abutting buildings. Approved the model as submitted. Landscaping to be resubmitted. DRB ACTION: Approved the construction - landscaping to be submitted. SRA ACTION: Approved Sawtell's - Washington St. The owner of the building would like to install security lighting at the rear of • the building. The Board recommended that the owner consider installing the light underneath the canopy and asked that they look at the lights installed on the adjacent Beef & Oyster building. The Board disapproved the use of sodium lighting. DRB ACTION: Resubmission required SRA ACTION: No action required Respectfully submitted, Ethel C. Crowell Salem@E 0 Redevelopment Y l pment TELEPHONE 744-6900 AutONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 744-4580 MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD DECEMBER 9, 1981 The Members of the Design Review met at One Salem Green, Salem, Mass. , on Wednesday, December 9, 1981, with the following members present: John Emerson, Helen Baldwin, Chris Green, Richard Minturn and Fred Johnson. The Board discussed the necessity of having a Chairman preside over the meetings, merely for the purpose of summarizing the Board's action taken on individual cases in the event there is a difference of opinion on certain decisions. It was recommended that a Chairman could be selected on a rotating basis. The Board reviewed the following proposals: Bowman Bakery Building/Essex St. It was proposed to block up certain windows on the side of the building near the parking lot and replace the sections with matching siding. The proposed paint color is to be Benjamin Moore's House Paint CB-44 Tan, CB-34 Beige, with 01-1-16 White Trim paint. *DRB ACTION: Approved SRA ACTION: Cafe Jerusalem - Derby Square The owner of the Cafe Jerusalem restaurant presented a sketch of the proposed wooden sign, which is to be carved lettering "Cafe Jerusalem". The background color is to be brown, white "middle east" type letters and a yellow carved coffee pot. The sign is to be hung outside the building arcade due to the fact that it would not be seen- if-placed underneath the arcade. The trees in the area would hide the sign when they are in full bloom. The Board questioned the use of the proposed typeface since they felt that it was difficult to read. It was recommended that the owner have the sign maker submit a new sketch using a proper "middle east" typeface and the Board will immediately review the sketch to expedite matters. DRB ACTION: Resubmission requested SRA ACTION: No action required. • MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD DEC. 9, 1981 Page, 2 The Board also noted that the bracket for the Cafe Jerusalem sign should be a &lain black iron bracket (which could be made of heavier material than shown on the sketch) and that all other signs for the building should be hung with the same type of bracket. The SRA's Project Administrator advised the Board that he will discuss the matter with the owner of the building to make sure that the signs are not placed on the building in a haphazard way. Essex Street parcel (between Khouri Rugs and Connelly's) The owners of the two buildings abutting the SRA's vacant piece of land, would like to construct a stairway that could be used by both building owners. The stairway is to be totally enclosed. The Essex Street section will be glass while the rear wall is to be solid construction. Construction of the tower will begin about 70 feet from the Essex St. Mall. Three sketches were submitted for the Board's consideration. After review of all the drawings, the Board preferred the total glass concept and recommended the glass be butt glazed to emphasize the horizontal separation. The Board recommended the roof line be either raised or lowered to give the appearance of bieng a separate piece of construction. The Board noted that they would like to see more detail for the rear wall construc- tion as well as the lighting treatment. Possibly more consideration could be given to •the relocation and height of the front door. Since the construction of the tower will be set back from Essex St. Mall, a landscaping plan will be submitted. DRB ACTION: Approved the preliminary plan SRA ACTION: Fr. Matthew Building - Martin Development/Gourdeau Construction The owners of the Fr. Matthew Building at 129 Essex Street, provided a complete design presentation for the rehabilitation of the Fr. Matthew Building complex. They propose to develop 14 residential units on the entire site (including the carraige houses) . Since the open views in the area are limited, the developers intend to create interior views where ever they can. A small appropriate wooden fence will be installed around the complex. Where the brickwork has to be replaced, a sample section will be constructed for the Board's inspection. The color and size of the brick has been difficult to find. The arches over the windows will be reproduced to match. MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD DEC. 9, 1981 Page 3 • The east and west elevations will have a dormer installed in such a way that it will make the attic usable. No dormers will be located on the front elevations but they would like to install three velux skylights which would be set back so that they cannot be seen from the street. The Board reviewed the side entrance treatment and recommended that the doorway be toned down since it is on a different plane relating to the front elevation. DRB ACTION: Approved the preliminary plan SRA ACTION: Respectfully submitted, Ethel C. Crowell • f Salem 0 Redevelopment 44-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744-4580 MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 12, 1981 Members of the Design Review Board met for a special meeting at One Salem Green, , Salem, Mass. on Thursday, November 12, 1981. The following members were present: Helen Baldwin, Richard Minturn, Christopher Greene, Frederick Johnson and John Emerson. The following proposals were reviewed: Harbortown Development - Norman Street Condominiums Mr. Gerald Baizen presented a revised plan for the mid-rise building. The original location of the air-conditioners would interfere with the interior layout in regard to draperies. The airconditoner extended into the room about twelve inches. Mr. Baizen proposed to bring the airconditioner further out to the exterior and place an architectural grille over the unit. He would like to use four foot windows for this purpose. The unit would protrude three inches from the brick work. The Board felt that the solution could be resolved from the inside and that the streetscape is an important facade and better served if the airconditoner is flush • to the building and centered under the window. Mr. Baizen agreed to the DRB's recommendation and agreed to provide a sample of the painted grille work before actual construction. Mr. Baizen had a meeting with the City Engineer about the sidewalk construction. He agreed to provide a four foot sidewalk but would not agree to a brick wall since this would restrict snow removal from the area. IIe would prefer to see an open fence so that there would be someplace for the snow to go when pushed by the snow plows. The City Engineer also recommended putting the trees on the property line. Mr. Baizen agreed to provide samples of the fence before installation. The walkway that was originally proposed will be discussed after the design for the adjacent parcel has been established. The exterior door design will be submitted at a later meeting.. DRB ACTION: Approved the airconditioners flush to the building with architectural grilles. Paint color, fence style, and door style will be submitted for approval. SRA ACTION: Approved MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD NOV. 12, 1981 Page 2 Newmark Building - David Jaquith, Architect David Jaquith presented a preliminary plan fora new.facade treatment for the rear of the Newmark Building on Essex Street." The new brick work will extend out 1'-4" to 1'-6" from the original wall. They have changed the scheme in regard to windows. It is proposed to have two windows instead of three due to interior mechanical construction. The stairway will be narrowed down. The bricks will match the same type used for site improvement work in the area. Working drawings will be submitted. DRB ACTION: Approved the preliminary plan SRA ACTION: Approved Stern Group I, Inc. - 28 Norman Street Condominiums In response to the recommendations made at the previous meetings, the architectural • team returned with revised drawings. Mr. Stern's architect recapped the results of previous meetings for the benefit of the new Board members. Scheme three was presented (dated Nov. 12, 1981) along with alternate schemes as a result of recent borings taken on the site. The building was brought forward toward Norman/Crombie Street leaving 70 feet of open space for the front yard. The drawings showed a brick garden wall or the use of a wooden fence along Norman and Crombie Street as a means of creating a more private area. Mr. Cobb noted that he had conversations with John Emerson, John Collins and Oscar Padjen in regard to site design and he feels that the alternatives make sense. Scheme three was presented with alternative sketches since it'was found necessary to tighten up the cost factor. It was proposed to bring the building forward to Norman and Crombie Street leaving an open yard with access from the corner. Parking would be at grade with a plant bed for a barrier. Mr. Cobb is seeking approval so that they may proceed with further design work. In regard to site conditions, Oscar Padjen felt that one boring test is not enough to warrant a change in the plan. There should be a lot more investigation of the site before approval is given. Mr. Padjen noted that the architectural team could make this an exciting project. The proposal could be better. The corner building could be a lightly loaded building of wood with brick veneer. Al MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD NOV. 12, 1981 Page 3 • The Chestnut Street Committee has discussed this matter at great length and felt the proposed Scheme Two was feasible. The parking on grade, as noted, does not leave the occupants with a good view. They are looking at cars and other large buildings. Oscar Padjen noted that a building running parallel to Norman Street would be the best of two worlds. There are many options available design wise that could be beneficial. John Emerson felt that it is time to make a decision. His feeling is that we have given the proposals thought. I find. this proposal to be an abstract and without open definition. A formal scheme was submitted in October and Oscar Padjen and others had a review session. At that time we really looked at it with an open mind and the consensus was what was suggested at the last meeting (a building on the corner) . I still believe that that is the best approach. The developer feels that it was not marketable and he has the understanding of where the market is for the project. I believe it is our responsiblity to take the urban attitude. I intend to stick with the original position. Richard Minturn - My feeling is that we speak for the City and whatever gets built will be here for a long time and it is important. There is almost nothing to buy in Salem in terms of housing in the Chestnut Street neighborhood. What I see is that the present piazza, as proposed, is not equivalent of urban design elements and I feel that landscaping can be equivalent of built form. So because our responsbility is to urban design I feel that I hgve to say that I can not support the new scheme as shown now and would rather put it back into the design process and look at it again. Helen Baldwin -I1came here happy with Scheme Two and came here with an open mind but after looking and listening, I have to go with Scheme 2 even though there is still a. design problem and I would like to think that there is time, there is always time for something important. Christopher Greene - I have looked at the site. It is a tough problem to deal with in terms of drawings. The scheme, which was presented the last time, is vastly preferable. This scheme might make the numbers work but does not meet what can happen at the site, which is the maintenance of the building line on Crombie Street which Could carry the urban design across Norman Street. I am not sure it has to be a building but if my desire is this one or Scheme 2, my vote is for Scheme 2. Frederick Johnson - I find myself sympathetic to this scheme due to conditions of Norman Street as it is now. But if I am opting for another choice I would take the option of another choice (another scheme for review) . The Board summed up their decision as follows: 1. That the design criteria for the development of the site should be to e MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD NOV. 12, 1981 Page • maintain a strong building, or building like structure, at the corner of Crombie and Norman Street. 2. That the DRB expressly votes a strong preference for Scheme 2. 3. That the DRB shall defer to the SRA regarding its decision to give formal ap- proval to the proposed development plans. DRB ACTION: Voted items 1,2,3, noted above. SRA ACTION: Approved Respectfully submitted, Ethel C. Crowell • SalemME • Redevelopment 4-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744-4580 MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE DESIGN REVEIW BOARD HELD OCT. 28, 1981 The members of the Design Review Board met at One Salem Green with the following members present: Helen Baldwin and Fred Johnson. Business Directory A mock up of. the business directory was submitted showing the map of the down- town area and the way the businesses will be listed by category. A print out of the final form will be submitted. Helen Baldwin recommended that the business category letters be larger than shown on the mock-up. It was also recommended that the map could be a separate item. !The Project Administrator is to investigate the color combinations and possibly • use black and white which would be less expensive. Resubmittal is requested. DRB ACTION: Recommended resubmittal SRA ACTION: No action required k>F*ic ic�Faticic::is*�k a` Weylus Restaurant Salem Sign presented a sample of the sign for the Restaurant for the Church St. entrance. The same type lettering is to be carried over to this restaurant as used in the original Weylus Restaurant. Letters are yellow on bronze background with dragons painted green, yellow, and Chinese lettering on either side of the WEYLUS TOO letters. Mr. Pannell of Salem Sign Co. noted that it will be difficult to see the sign when the trees are in full bloom. Helen Baldwin recommended that the WEYLUS TOO letter be made larger and centered on the signboard. It was agreed that Salem Sign is to resubmit the revised lettering on Thursday 0 and it will be reviewed by the DRB individually in order to expedite the matter. Note: Revised lettering received Thursday, approved by DRB DRB ACTION - Approved SRA ACTION: Approved MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD OCT. 28, 1981 Page 2 • Barton Playhouse Resubmittal of the building treatment showed theatrical lights' lighting up the facade. Banners will hang from the second level. It was recommended that the banners be installed at the same height across the building. It is hoped that the adjacent building will be removed to open up the entire area and make the building visible. It is also recommended that the board to be used for advertising the performance of the day is to be one flat plank painted white. Banner material is to be submitted for approval. DRB ACTION: Resubmission approved - banner material to be submitted. SRA ACTION: To be returned to the Design Review Board for further study Historic Markers for the City The Board reviewed the proposal for the City map and historic text. It was recommended that the maps shown did not meet the needs of the sign and if the signs are to be • in place for a number of years, it would be better if a map could be drawn up for this particular purpose. The Board would prefer to see one large map. It was recommended that they consider having a "YOU ARE HERE" note placed on each map. Each sign will have no more than three photographs and text with space for credits and the City seal. The Board noted that they would like to see the actual typeface to be used and how it will fit within the text column. Resubmittal requested. DRB ACTION: Requested resubmission SRA ACTION: No action required. Respectfully submitted, Ethel C. Crowell • i � Salem • Redevelopment 44-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE Baa-4580 MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 14, 1981 Fotomat - Approved as submitted - sample of awning is to be submitted. Jerry's Army & Navy Store - Scope of work submitted - Approved Kawneer 1-3/4" window system (bronze to replace existing windows and Kawneer Medium doors at entrance approved). Sign for Jerry's - Typeface Scholar Style 2 - recommended brick red trim and sign background with white letters, bins seen from the street should be gray (made to disappear) . Historic Salem Signs - Approved as submitted. Recommend at least 3" diameter pipe Problem of back side of signs - resubmittal of concept requested. • Burger King requested resubmittal of proposal. Barton Square Playhouse - Sign and blue awning approved. Loading dock should be boxed in to create a simple shape. Resubmittal requested. Respectfully submitted, Christopher G. Olney i • MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD AUGUST 26. 1981 Washington/Bridge St. Project - Phase III - Steve Tise Steve Tise presented preliminary working drawings for Phase III condominiums. The construction will be similar to that of Phase II. There will be five bays (total of 10 units) and 13 parking spaces. End walls will be brick. Stairways will be facing the parking lot, material will be the same as the other buildings in the project. Construction drawings will be ready in a few weeks. It was recommended that they use a four foot brick wall around the edge as opposed to the six foot fence used in Phase I. Mr. Tise noted that it is time to talk about the landscaping plan that was proposed by the SRA along Washington and Bridge Street. • The DRB advised Mr. Tise that this is a matter between the SRA and the developer. DRB ACTION: Approved final working drawings subject to submission of construction drawings. SRA ACTION: Connelly's Candies The owner of Connelly's Candies submitted a rough sketch for his sign. The sketch showed the names of the two businesses (Connelly's and Mary Brennan's Card Shop). Questions were raised in regard to the letter typeface and spacing. It was recommended by the Board that the lines used to separate the two business names be removed. The Card Shop letters be reduced in size. The colors be changed to , tan color background and dark brown letters and that the owner use the same type frame that he uses in all his advertising with the understanding that the edge work on the side of the frame be made of heavy furniture wood, and rounded. • The revised submission was reviewed by members of the Board and approved subject to compliance with the recommendations made. DRB ACTION: Approved SRA ACTION: 10-12 Crombie Street - David Jaquith Final construction drawings were submitted by David Jaquith for 10 Crombie St. building. No,changes have been made in the drawings since the last submission except adding the lintel line across the building as recommended by the Board. DRB ACTION: Approved SRA ACTION: • Nicastro's Beauty Salon Mr. Nicastro returned to the DRB meeting to request permission to place a plaque at the downstairs entrance to his building. The Board felt strongly that a plaque is not the answer and not appropriate for his type of business. The SRA's Project Administrator agreed to call the owner of the building to find out if he could work something out. He would like to organize some type of directory for everyone in the building. NO ACTION NECESSARY *************** 28 Norman Street Project The architect for the project presented a plan which he submitted to the Board of • Appeal for a zoning variance eliminating the underground parking which solves the • drainage issue and eliminating possible ground water problems. The proposed plaza would create abetter view for the owners of the condominium and act as a buffer between the buildings and the Chestnut Street area. John Collins sent a sketch for possible use of the building site. This was the first opportunity the architect had to see the sketch and compare it to what was drawn up for the meeting. Oscar Padjen noted he and others are concerned about the scale and hopefully that the Chestnut St. view would not terminate abruptly. He felt that the project should be an extension of Chestnut Street. The architect noted that Mr. Padjen is talking about the scheme as a pedestrian's point of view which is a likeable part of urban living. Ronald Barnes felt that because of the tightness of the sight the only thing to do is use the John Collins Plan. • O. Padjen agreed with the approach taken by John Collins with the parking located between the units. Architect Dan Riah felt that there is a density difference in the John Collins Plan. He would hope to mix the good qualities of both. John Emerson noted that it is important to relate to Crombie St as well as Chestnut St. O. Padjen stated the public interest is important. The Chestnut St. view should be weighed heavily. There is now an o pportunit to do something really great in urban design. The schemes themselves are good and worth while but from a public stand point more could be done and there are more important issues beyond the particular schemes. The open corner is the problem. Dan Riah stated that the developer has complied with all the recommendations, his client has been cooperative, but it is now time for the Board to decide how it is going to • respond in terms of what it is that they want. • O. Padjen stated that he would consider augmenting what we have already. John Emerson noted that there are three issues: 1. The principal question of how the pedestrian way might be applied to the building. Z. The effect of the building on the Crombie St. streetscape. 3. The entrance to the parking area on Norman Street. He would like to see an attempt to use a plan similar to the John Collins scheme. He is also concerned about Crombie Street. The Board agreed to recommend that the architect attempt to consider suggestions made by John Collins and they will meet again for a special session whenever he is ready. The Board felt that the building mass should be along the street line. The Board agreed to meet on Thursday, Sept. 3, 1981 at noon. Respectfully submitted, • Ethel C. Crowell On Sept. 3, 1981 the DRB reconvened its meeting and reviewed the revised plans. DRB ACTION: Approved new concept for Stern Group development at corner of Crombie and Norman St. SRA ACTION: The Board also reviewed the final plans for the Barton Square condominium development. DRB ACTION: Approved SRA ACTION: Note: Due to the number of meetings held on the above projects - and since 4 time is of the essence to mail the material, I did not elaborate on the DRB's comments at the Sept. 3rd meeting. MINUTES OF THE MEE'T'ING OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD WEDNESDAY AUGUST 1Z, 1981 • bn Wednesday, August 12, 1981, the members of the Design Review Board met with the following members present: Ronald Barnes, Frederick Johnson, and Annie Harris. The Board reviewed the following proposals. Eastern Savings Bank Since the architect for the Eastern Savings Bank (Salem Savings Bank) did not attend the previous meeting the Board was asked to clarify its recommendations . Mr. English also wanted the Board to know that the entrance door must he recessed to comply with the State Building Code. The Board had no objection to changing the Washington Street entrance. DRB ACTION: Approved SRA ACTION: Approved Salem Leash - Washington Street The owner presented a sketch of the proposed sign (plywood - brown background with gold leaf lettering) which is to be installed flush to the building and centered over the door and window area. DRB ACTION: Approved SRA ACTION: Approved Jerry's Army & Navy Store Andrew Innes of the Planning Dept. attended the meeting to discuss the possibilities for the rehabilitation of the building occupied by Jerry's which is located in Heritage Plaza-West. He noted that most of the original facade still remains although some of the original side windows have been bricked up. Ronald Barnes felt that it should be totally rehabilitated to its original concept or ' Q consider doing something entirely different. • Annie Harris felt that the brick influence is not the solution. A. Innes stated that he is here to get some direction for a design that would be acceptable. Preliminary drawings will be submitted at the next meeting. NO ACTION NECESSARY Sawtell's The new owners of the Sawtell building attended the meeting to review the drawings for changes along Washington St. and at the rear of the building. It will be necessary to have two entrances on Washington Street since the office supply store will be a separate operation from the offices upstairs. The wood shutters will be replaced and painted. The new rear dormer at the rear of the building will be refinished and painted to blend in with - the slate roof. They would like to add a deck to the flat roof strictly for recreational purposes. It was recommended that they use wood railing as opposed to metal. It was also recommended that they use a darker gray paint for the shutters and dormer. It was agreed that a sample color will be submitted for approval. DRB ACTION: Approved SRA ACTION: Approved Burger King Building - Washington St. A proposal was made to rehabilitate the store front. Preliminary sketches were submitted showing possible treatment. The Board felt that the proposed material would . lead to extensive vandalism and recommended that they restudy the situation and come • back with a revised proposal. NO ACTION NECESSARY Bowman Bakery Building - Essex St. The DRB was advised that the SRA has agreed to purchase a facade easement on the Bowman Bakery Building and a modified scope of work has been prepared, based on the original feasibility study prepared by Staley McDermet . The SRA Board also agreed to engage Staley McDermet as the architect in charge of the work. In the revised scope of work, the chimney and cornice work has been eliminated. The siding will be removed and windows will be replaced as part of the work. All work will be performed on the second and third floors and on all four sides. The brick work will be cleaned and reparged. Work on the store front will not be included as part of the scope • of work. This will be performed by the owner when a firm agreement is reached by the owner and a tenant. Colors will be submitted at a later date. Members of the Salem Historic Commission were asked to attend the meeting to participate in the review of the plazas for the building since the Bowman Bakery Building abuts the historic district. Mr. John Carr and Dean Lahikainen had not objection to the proposed scope of work. DRB ACTION/SALEM HISTORIC COMM.: Approved SRA ACTION: Approved at previous SRA meeting Connelly's Candies - Essex Mall The owner of Connelly's Candies submitted a sign for the new store on the Essex _ • Mall. The Board made recommendations to remove the wood framing around the sign and submit a new design with consideration to the treatment of the two business names on one sign. NO ACTION NECESSARY rJ • The Board also reviewed the situation involving the removal of the original door. The D,RB did not approve the replacement door and still maintains the original door should be reinstalled. ' s The SRA Board also reviewed this situation at its meeting held Aug. 11, 1981 and agreed with the DRB's recommendation that the original door be reinstalled. 28 Norman Street The architects for the project (Lee Cott, Dan Raih and David Berkowitz) presented proposals that were drawn up and studied. One of which has been chosen to make the best possible use of the site. They noted that they realize the importance of the Chestnut Street vista and tried to keep that in mind in the preparation of the sketches. Four design concepts were presented to show the Board different treatments investigated to come up with the best design. • Design "A" - dealt with a linear building -units would face the parking lot and gas station. Design "B" - units would be built along Norman St. - would have a Norman St. view. Design "C" - "L" shaped scheme - with covered parking - the advantage to this treatment would be that it would add something to the open corner (landscaped park) and the view would relate to the Chestnut Street area. Design "D" - "L" shaped building along the street edge - view would be of the parking lot. They are asking for approval of schematic design "C" so that they may go on with architectural drawings. It was also noted by the architects that they would have to comply with the zoning requirements for the area. Members of the Chestnut Street Associates (Oscar Padjen and Philip Bourne) attended the meeting to participate in the review process. It was noted at the meeting that the members of the Chestnut Street Associates will be advised of the design concept and will come back to the DRB with a report from the Association. Ronald Barnes noted that he would like to have John Collins and John Emerson review the drawings before the next meeting. DRB ACTION: Approved the concept of Scheme C SRA ACTION: No action until drawings reviewed by all DRB members Respectfully submitted, Ethel C. Crowell • ILI SalemMM Redevelopment 44-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744 4580 MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD JULY 15, 1981 On July 15, 1981, the members of the DRB met at One Salem Green, Salem, Mass. with the following members present: Helen Baldwin, Ronald Barnes, John Emerson and Fred Johnson, to review the following proposals: Cafe Jerusalem - Central Plaza sign Signs as presented are approved on a temporary basis - one for each facade - until such time as the condominium presents its total sign plan for the entire complex. DRB ACTION: Approved on temporary basis SRA ACTION: Approved temporary sign • Barton Sq. Condominiums - G. Baizen North And West elevations are approved subject to submission of working drawings. The DRB requests submission of landscaping plan and hardware as well as door colors before installation. DRB ACTION: Approved SRA ACTION: Approved Household Finance Company - sign The Board felt that the sign, as submitted, should be reduced in height to fit within the sign board. The square configuration with the HFC insert should also be reduced in height to come into perspective with the rest of the sign. DRB ACTION: Approved subject to recommended changes SRA ACTION: Approved with changes • MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD July 15, 1981 Page 2 Eastern Savings Bank - facade change The Board reviewed the drawings submitted to change the facade. After review, the Board felt that the side lites should remain which is a decorative element. The logo (ship) should be taken off and it was agreed that there is no need to change any glass at all. In bricking up the windows, the brick should be recessed 1/2" to match the rest of the brick work. DRB ACTION: Approved with recommended changes SRA ACTION: Approved with changes Respectfully submitted Christopher G. Olney • re Salem Redevelopment 44-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744-4580 MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD JUNE 30, 1981 The members of the Design Review Board met for a special meeting to review the revised plans for the Barton Square Townhouse/condo project, with the following members present: Helen Baldwin, Ronald Barnes, John Wright and John Emerson. Mr. Gerald Baizen, developer of the project, and his architect returned to the special meeting with revised design drawings as recommended by the Board at the previous meeting. The mansard roof treatment was revised and the window spacing was_r_hanged. Although the roof treatment has been changed, the developer is maintaining the same height as the Telephone Building. New treatment was introduced in the window, detail. . The Board approved the design concept for the building along Norman Street. The Townhouse building was reviewed and it was agreed that the architect will restudy the window configuration and make another presentation to the DRB at the next special meeting scheduled for July 15, 1981. a Salem Redevelopment 44-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744-4580 MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD WEDNESDAY, JUNE 24, 1981 The members of the Design Review Board met for a special meeting:on Wednesday, June 24, 1981 with the following members present: Helen Baldwin, Ronald Barnes, John Wright, John Emerson and Annie Harris. The following proposals were reviewed: Peabody Block - Washington Street The owner is replacing a number of windows in the building. It is requested that he be allowed to install metal pieces in the arch on the top floor in place of glass. He stated that it would cost about $800 per window. The Board disapproved the installation of metal and felt that he should investigate other places for a better price for the windows. The Board noted that metal would not be in keeping with the exterior value of the building. DRB ACTION: Disapproved the use of metal SRA ACTION: Disapproved the use of metal Salem Smoker Building - 144 Essex Street Samples of awning material was presented to the Board for approval. The owner of Pelletier's Shade Shop attended the meeting and had samples of various types of awning material. The DRB chose Boyle awning #2738 (Red, Green, Black, Orange and Gold) stripes. DRB ACTION: Approved - Boyle #2738 SRA ACTION: Approved it,F,Fic,Y,k ic* MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD JUNE 24, 1981 Page 2 Minit Print Awning - 79 Washington Street Sample material was submitted - DRB selected #9419 (Rust,Beige,Red, Brown) stripes. DRB ACTION: Approved SRA ACTION: Approved Norman St. Townhouse/Condo project - Gerry Baizen Mr. Baizen advised the Board that it is economically unfeasible to go ahead with the underground garage concept and that he has decided to reduce the number of units from 72 to 41, create a larger open space for parking (street level) and extending a walkway from Barton Square to Norman Street. Mr. Baizen stated that he will contact DeIulis Bros. to talk about additional parking spaces. The DRB recommended that Mr. Baizen consider construction of a brick wall along Barton Sq. to create a separation of the residential area from the commercial • area. The walkway running behind the Dunkin Donut building, extending out to Norman Street, will be of step down, platform type construction due to the "grade" in that area and for safety reasons during the winter months. Trees will be planted at the.rear of the Telephone Building. It is our under- standing that the Telephone Company will remove the chain link fence. Numerous trees and plants will be planted in the parking area to create a better view for the tenants, even taking into consideration the winter months. A recommendation was made to Mr. Baizen to consider adding one more building to the townhouse complex. Mr. Baizen felt that there would be a problem with access and egress. At this time the Board discussed the proposed design for the buildings. A number fo recommendations were made on how the roof design should be treated. The Board was in favor of possibly using a bay window on the top floor at each corner of the building along Norman Street. The Developer agreed to study this arrangement. The developer also noted that the next time he would like to discuss the air- conditioning system. It was agreed that the Board would meet Tuesday, June 30th at noon to review the design drawings. DRB ACTION: Approved the building layout as presented. SRA ACTION: Approved. Respectfully submitted, Ethel C. Crowell ale%MEE Redevelopment -6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744-4580 MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD WEDNESDAY, MAY 13, 1981 The members of the Design Review Board met at One Salem Green, Salem, Mass. , on Wednesday, May 13, 1981 with the following members present: Ronald Barnes, John Wright, John Emerson, Fred Johnson and Annie Harris, to review the following proposals: Market Enclosure - Olde Salem Heritage Shop - Jeff Allen The Market Agent has a new tenant for the "YUM YUM" market stall. The existing enclosure will be removed and replaced with new construction that will conform to all the other enclosures in the market area. The only change will be a double pane window will be installed on the Derby Street end of the building. The trim will be the same blue trim as was used on the Hand Crafts of New England building (F1at,Latex #213 Georgetown Blue) . e • A sketch of the sign was also presented for approval. The sign,', two inch wood, lettrs carved into both sides and painted with gold leaf, the background will be painted blue. The border all-.around the- sign will be cut to a forty-five degree angle and painted black. DRB ACTION: Approved the enclosure and sign as presented SRA ACTION: Approved Bernard's sign - Raymond Tetrault Mr. Tetrault presented a sample letter style that will be used. The letters will be 10" in height, placed flush against the building, centered on the existing beam over the entrance. DRB ACTION: Approved SRA ACTION: Approved • MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD MAY 13, 1981 PAGE 2 Barton Square Condo Development - Gerald Baizen Mr. Baizen presented another site plan based on recommendations made at previous meetings by the DRB and Planning Dept. (three and two story structures/townhouses with one and two bedroom units) . There were two areas of concern where the DRB felt that the developer should restudy. The Board felt that the entrance from Norman Street was too wide and should be narrowed down by creating a walkway and possibly continuing the walkway around to Washington /Norman Street end of the building to maintain a connection with the Washington Street area. The developer explained the construction for the underground parking area which has a bearing on how much landscaping can be done at the entrance. The Board noted that consideration should be given to as much landscaping as possible along Norman Street by the SRA to soften the entrance-way. In regard to design, the Board felt that the use of long windows could be used to break up the fenestration of the building. It was proposed to have balconies on some of the units facing the courtyard but the design has not been worked out as yet. It was considered by the developer that the exterior treatment will be predomin- ately masonry. Although, at this time everything is preliminary and consideration will • be given to the use of other materials depending on what can be used in this particular fire district. DRB ACTION: Preliminary plan approved (recommended that the next submission include elevations of surrounding buildings to show the relationship to the area). SRA ACTION: Approved CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS PLANNING DEPARTMENT • .,co�.v�r1'Vi W.GREGORY SENKO ONESALEM GREEN CITY PLANNER 9 _ g 01970 Sri �r`q (617)744-4580 MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD TUESDAY, MAY 5, 1981 The members of the Design Review Board met at One Salem Green, Salem, Mass. on Tuesday, May 5, 1981, to review the proposal submitted by Crowninshield Corp. for conversion of the Pickering School building into condominium units. Members of the Design Review Board present: Helen Baldwin, John Wright and Fred Johnson. Robert Scagliotti, architect for the project, presented design plans for twenty- five condominium units. There are provisions for 39 parking spaces. The Board was advised that there would be no major changes made to the building. • Two windows will be replaced in the smaller building. It is proposed to install sixteen "Velux" windows in the attic of the original building. The first and second floors of the building addition will be converted to "flats" while the major building conversion will be townhouse type units. A new walkway will be created with grassy areas along the North Street side. All bituminous concrete will be removed. There will be a small park area created for the condominium owners with slow fence around the park to define public/private space. It was also noted that the developer intends to install plantings and shrubbery where necessary to provide screening. DRB ACTION: Approved the plans submitted subject to resubmission of construction drawings showing the location of the skylights and landscaping. The Board was assured by the Architect that if the contractor makes any deviation from the approved construction plans, the Design Review Board must review and approve each change. Respectfully submitted, thel C. Crowell i SalerriRE Redevelopment 44-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744-4580 MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MINUTES HELD WEDNESDAY, APRIL 8, 1981 On Wednesday, April 8, 1981, the members of the Design Review Board met with the following members present: Helen Baldwin, John Emerson, Fred Johnson, and Annie Harris. The following proposals were reviewed: Nicastro - beauty salon sign for 254 Essex Street A sign for the window on the second floor was reviewed and the owner was advised that a second floor window sign is in violation of the sign ordinance in the urban renewal area. They would prefer to see the name on a wall directory on the street entrance. The owner of the beauty salon noted that he would want some type of identification. The Board recommended picture display boards being located near the window, close enough to be seen by pedestrian/vehicular traffic (no wording). • It was emphasized by the Board that the tenants in that particular building should request the owner to place a directory at the doorway entrance to the second floor. DRB ACTION: Approved picture displays for the window - disapproved the window sign. SRA ACTION: Approved East India Mall - entrance signs It was requested by the new Mall Manager, Mr. Hurlihey, that Salem Corp. be allowed to place a sign at entrances to the Mall (Essex St. and St. Peter St.). Again they are having difficulty identifying the entrance to the Mall area. It seems that people who are not familiar with Salem think that the building is part of the garage. The Board had no objection to the proposed submission for the front entrance (Essex St. Mall) using 3/4" marine plywood mounted on the bronze metal fascia and white 'Bookman" type letters. The Board disapproved the proposal for the St. Peter St. entrance and recommended that they use the same treatment for St. Peter St. entrance as they proposed for the Essex Mall entrance. DRB ACTION: Approved Essex St. Mall entrance and recommended same treatment for 0 St. Peter St. entrance. SRA ACTION: Approved i MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD APRIL 8, 1981 Page 2 Joshua Ward House Plaque - Staley McDermet The Board was advised that the wording is correct on the plaque and the location would not be in conflict with the proposed sign for the new owner. DRB ACTION: Approved SRA ACTION: Approved at a previous meeting (recommended review by the DRB at that time) County Commissioner's Building - Ronald Barnes • Renovation plans were submitted for the area between the Commissioner's building and the adjacent building to allow for new entrances and a handicap ramp as well as a new vestibule area on the Federal Street side of the building. New entrance will be made to the building from Bridge St. The reason for the new entrances is that the first floor of the Commissioner's building is being renovated for additional office space. The Board had no objection to the construction plans presented other than the fact that if the plans are changed and it is found that there would be interference with the decorative elements of the tower then new plans are to be submitted. The Board did express concern about the lack of landscaping along Federal Street to soften the use of so much concrete and required submission of landscaping plans at a later date. DRB ACTION: Approved the construction plan (subject to no interference of the tower). If this should happen new plans are to be submitted. Requires further landscaping plans at a later date. SRA ACTION: Approved Respectfully submitted, Ethel C. Crowell Ilk Sent to DRB Members 3-27-81 SalemEE N- Redevelopment 44-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744 4580 MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD MARCH 11, 1981 On Wednesday, March 11, 1981, the members of the Design Review Board met in open session for its regular meeting with the following members present: John Wright, Helen Baldwin, John Collins, Annie Harris and John Emerson. The following proposals were reveiwed: Lyceum Fence - John Emerson It was proposed to install a six foot wooden fence between the restaurant and the Heritage Cooperative Bank building to discourage use of the alley as a passageway. The stain samples will be submitted at a later date. DRB ACTION: Approved as submitted (Note: John Emerson refrained from voting) ORA ACTION: Approved (Joan Boudreau .refrained from voting) Joshua Ward House - plaque The Board reviewed the wording for the plaque and expressed concern about the wording as well as the historical facts (John Wright agreed to ask the Essex Institute Director to review the statement), The Board also felt that it would be easier to read if the letters were in upper and lower case. They would also like to see a sample of the "Classic" letters. It was recommended that the architect be specific as to where the plaque will be located and that the location should be coordinated with the installation of the Carlson Real Estate Office sign. DRB ACTION: Resubmission requested SRA ACTION: No action required Stern-rise condo office - grille color • The Board agreed that the grilles remain white as previously approved. INUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING - MARCH 11, 1981 Page 2 Crombie Street Development - David Jaquith After review of the plans submitted, the Board expressed concern on the parking arrangement, entrance walk separation and the relationship to the street. The Board recommended reducing the easement a few feet to allow for a better pedestrian entry. The Board agreed that it is a good use for the site, proper density and an acceptable building which is in keeping with existing buildings in the area, historical development and street scape. DRB ACTION: Approved the preliminary drawings subject to the incorporation of the recommendations noted above. SRA ACTION: Approved Barton Square Development - Gerald Baizen The DRB reviewed the site plan and approved the concept, re: massing, density and eneral site disposition. The Board did express concern about the lack of useable outdoor, � private space, open space seems to be dominated by cars. DRB ACTION: Approved the concept as presented SRA ACTION: Approved the concept Respectfully submitted, Ethel C. Crowell Additional item: Giovanna's Deli/Bakery - reviewed individually by the members of the DRB DRB ACTION: Approved subject to the letters G to S being evenly spaced from the bottom of the sign SRA ACTION: Approved subject to compliance with the DRB's recommendations. 0 JIM Salem Redevelopment -6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744-4580 MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD WEDNESDAY, FEB. 11, 1981 On Wednesday, February 11, 1981, the members of the Design Review Board met at One Salem Green, Salem, Mass. with the following members present: Helen Baldwin, John Wright, John Collins, John Emerson and Annie Harris. The Board reviewed the following proposals: Pickering Wharf - Porch for Mr. John Hopkins The owner of the condominium at Pickering Wharf would like to install a porch on his building (facing the parking area) . Photographs were presented showing existing porches on other buildings in the area. Mr. Hopkins stated that he plans to build the same type of porch to match the existing porches. After review of the drawings presented, the Board recommended that it should not be butted against the other grooves, it should have breathing space with about a • 7" space... It was requested that the owner try to screen the meters on the building. After discussion the Board felt that the porch itself would shadow the meters, although the owner of the condominium stated he would cooperate in making the area acceptable. DRB ACTION: Approved the construction of the porch as submitted subject to the 7" space noted. Market Agent - Fence It was noted that the fence around the meters was installed by the Salem News sometime ago. The old fence was removed and the meters were left open to vandalism and the City Electrician required some type of protection. The Salem News agreed to install the fence at its expense. The DRB recommended the fence be painted a dark brown (which must be galvanized first) . It was also recommended that three Fire Thorn Bushes be placed along the front of the fence. DRB ACTION: Approved the fence subject to painting it dark brown and the installation of the plantings in the Spring. • SRA ACTION:" Approved the DRB's recommendation MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD FEB. 11, 1981 Page 2 • Market Association Members of the Market Association (Larry's, Camera Obscura and Antique Collectables) presented a proposal for a directory which they felt should be located on the Essex Street Mall, Derby St. and Front Street entrances to the Mall. The Board was advised that the City had told them when they signed the lease that signs would be located for identification purposes and that people are having a difficult time trying to locate' the Salem Market Place when they come into Salem. It also seems to be confusing when the shopping area in the East India Mall also has the name "Market Place". It was proposed that they would use the standard bracket (pole) that everyone in the Market Stall area is using and the name: of:each store will be located on the directory. If this is not acceptable they would be willing to use the national symbol system on the sign instead of,the names. Helen Baldwin felt that the directory is not the solution to the problem and that the area is becoming overcrowed ( , John Collins felt that they have a good point that no one seems to be able to find the market area. • It was noted that the Town Hall completely obscures the market area looking down from the Essex Street Mall. At this time the Board requested a status report on the Planning Dept. 's sign project. Andrew Innes advised the Board that the signs for the downtown are out for bid and the City's funds are coming out of site improvements. The DRB did not take any action of this matter and advised the Merchants Association that if they could come in with a successful solution in the way of a directory it would be considered. DRB - disapproved the directory as submitted K SRA ACTION: Disapproved the Directory with the understanding that the City's signs will be reviewed after they have been installed for a reasonable time. G. Aulson - Federal Street Building After taking a look at the building the Board approved the Ox-Line #982 paint sample (soft white) for the trim and recommended that the existing stairway be painted also. DRB ACTION: Approved paint trim Ox-Line #982 SRA ACTION: Approved paint trim as recommended The DRB requested the SRA write a letter to the owners of the Fire House Coffee Shop asking them to attend the next Salem Redevelopment Authority/DRB meeting • MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD FEB. 11, 1981 Page 3 di cu � to- s ss the condition of the signs on the Thirty Church St. building and what .,they intend to do about refinishing the signs. SRA will send a letter to the**q°A%iA*o*f**tAe.,*C*offee Shop. Market Agent - Bakery sign for the market stall A preliminary plan was presented for the Giovanni Bakery - Deli sign. The sketch showed the use of a rolling pin hanging from the standard bracket (pole) . The DRB recommended that the sign be changed using only the rolling pin with lettering below. The lettering will be restudied and the sign will be re- submitted. DRB ACTION: Resubmission required SRA ACTION: No action necessary • Carlson Real Estate - Joshua Ward House sign Mr. Carlson presented a sketch for his sign at the Joshua Ward House. The Board felt that the horizontal bar and angle bar on the post was too heavy for the sign. It was recommended that Mr. Carlson consider other alternatives, i.e. shortening the length of the horizontal bar, moving the sign closer to the post; consider other ways of installing the sign such as a free standing post sign; either a reproduction of a period sign or one that is completely contemporary. It was agreed the sign should read "Carlson Real Estate Administrative Office" (without telephone numbers) ; a small pedestrian type sign of simple wood construction. The scale should relate to pedestrian traffic yet still be readable from vechicular traffi—c ; DRB ACTION - Resubmission requested SRA ACTION: No action necessary ******************** Stern-Tise - Phase III condominiums • Stephen Tise and Jeffery Stern presented preliminary plans for condominiums for the Phase III project (Bridge St. and Rust St.) . MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD FEB. 11, 1981 Page 4 • It was proposed that the project would consist of 10 units. The buildings will have slight variations of the Phase II project (Federal/Washington Sts.) . Thirteen parking spaces - an extension of the existing parking area. The elevation from Phase I will be carried over into the Phase III project but it will be necessary to build with a zero setback line all along the walkway. The one unit closest to Bridge Street will have to be treated with consideration of the low grade line along Bridge St. Considerationwill also be given to closing off the Rust Street opening taking into consideration .that the Church will still have to have access for wedding funeral and,Sunday services. " The SRA will install public improvements along. Washington and Bridge Streets. DRB ACTION: The DRB approved "0" setback construction as proposed, which it felt is reasonable and desirable in urban design terms and consistent with the Urban Renewal Plan. SRA ACTION: Approved the design concept and "0" setback as presented. Barton Sq. Guidelines • �- The DRB reviewed the guidelines as requested by the SRA Board and the DRB had no other recommendations to make at this time since the plan submitted was merely a concept drawing. DRB ACTION: Approved the guidelines presented Mr. Baggage - Front St. store sign The DRB was informed that a sign permit was inadvertently given to the owner of the store by the Planning Dept. DRB ACTION: Approved the sign (for the record) SRA ACTION: �Approved the sign (fo•W bhe record) The members of the DRB discussed the change in time for its meeting and agreed to meet at 3:00 P.M. to discuss proposals submmitted prior to meeting with the individuals submitting proposals in order to expedite approvals/disapprovals. Next meeting will be March 11, 1981 at 3:00 P.M. (unless a special meeting is called) . • Respectfully submitted, Ethel C. Crowell Salem Redevelopment 44-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744-4580 MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD JANUARY 21, 1981 On Wednesday, January 21, 1981, the Design Review Board met at One Salem Green with the following members present: Ronald Barnes, Helen Baldwin, John Wright, Michael McDougall and John Collins. The Board reviewed the following proposals. Deery Parking Lot (Norman Street) The parking lot has been recently sold for development. The new owner presented a preliminary concept for the development of the site. It was proposed that the site would accommodate 86 residential units in one building with two levels of underground parking. The Board felt that the scale of the building on the site was too large for the • location. The developer should study the area, reverse his thinking on the use of the four and six levels, and the fact that the view of the Joshua Ward House should be respected in the preparation of formal construction plans. It was also noted that the location of the curb cut poses a question of safety. This matter should be carefully studied. Formal plansare to be presented at a later date. DRB ACTION: Approved the concept for residential use - recommended further study of building construction. SRA ACTION Recommended that design guidelines be reviewed by the DRB In line with the Joshua Ward House, the Board requests submission of the proposed plaque and an indication of where it is to be located. The Design Review Board requests the SRA to. send a letter to the new tenant in the Front Street building (Luggage Shop) requesting them to remove the paper signs from the window and come in with a formal presentation for a permanent sign. • MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD JAN. 21, 1981 Page 2 Manpower - 16 Front Street - sign Mr. Jeff Neives requested approval for a second floor projecting sign. Mr. McDougall noted that he is not in favor of second floor signs. Ronald Barnes stated that the Board is trying to encourage the owners to place a directory on buildings occupied by a number of different tenants. Mr. Neives explained to the Board that he has had a number of complaints from his people while trying to locate the doorway to get up to his second floor office. The need for the sign is important to his business as a means of identification. Mr. McDougall felt that the owner, Mr. Welch, should arrange to have a directory for his tenants and he would be willing to discuss the matter with Mr. Welch on behalf of the Board, and, from a designer's point of view, he does not care for the appearance created by having signs placed on the first and second floor levels. John Wright recommended that in discussion with Mr. Welch it should be recommended that Mr. Welch replace the missing numbers along the Front Street building. Mr. McDougall stated that the building is getting out of control in regard to signs • as a consequence of numerous tenants occupying the building. John Collins felt that the sign should be at eye level in line with other signs on the building. Helen Baldwin maintained that a directory for the entire building would be the solution to the problem. The Board reviewed the situation and after taking into consideration the fact that the directory may not be installed right away, the tenant is in need of a sign. The Board agreed to waive the rules for a special need and approved the projecting sign subject to a change in the location. The sign is to be located at street level to the right of the doorway, centered on the pier. DRB ACTION: Projecting sign approved - new location approved SRA ACTION: Approved 667 Elderly Housing - St. Peter/Bridge Sts. - Steve Tise Preliminary drawings for the elderly housing presented by the developer indicated they will use brick material along the long walls with stucco around the windows . The end walls will be stucco. Due to budget restraints changes had to be made on the type of material to be used. Code problems eliminated the use of wood similar to that used • on the condominium buildings. A garden area will be located near the rear entrance and a more formal area is planned for the front entrance. The service area facing Bridge Street will have a high brick wall for screening purposes . MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING, JAN. 21, 1981 Page 3 • It is anticipated that they will be ready to go out to bid by March or April. The DRB approved the building drawings subject to receipt of final construction drawings and recommends that the site improvement work around the building be designed in keeping with all other site improvements in the urban renewal area such as landscaping, sidewalks; etc. DRB ACTION: Approved with recommendations noted above SRA ACTION: Approved Bernard's - sign - Raymond Tetrault Mr. Tetrault presented a preliminary sketch of the proposed letters for the building. The letters are to be bronze and placed above the entrance on the granite slab. The granite slab has not been put in place as yet so there is enough time to order a specific letter type approved by the Board. John Wright suggested a Victorian type letter that would be in keeping with • the building. The Board requested a sample of the letter before taking formal action. Mr. Tetrault stated that he will make a resubmission for his sign. DRB ACTION: Resubmission requested SRA ACTION: No action required Respectfully submitted, Ethel Crowell : e Salem • Redevelopment 44-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 7444580 MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 10, 1980 The members of the Design Review Board met at One Salem Green on Wednesday, December 10, 1980 with the followng members present: Ronald Barnes, Helen Baldwin and John Wright. The following proposals were reviewed: JOURNEYMASTERS - Essex Street Linda Berard of Journeymasters advised the Board they would like to replace the existing sign on the building at 252 Essex Street (next to Touraine's) with the new name of the travel business. A sketch of the sign, drawn to scale, was presented. aThe Board advised Ms. Berard that they are trying to avoid sign clutter on the buildings. The suggested that since they are located in a multi-occupied building the owner should place a directory on the face of the building for the tenants. The Board felt that the type of business they have does not warrant a pedestrian sign. The Board recommends the Salem Redevelopment Authority Board send a letter to the owner recommending a directory be placed on the building facade. The DRB had no objection to the sign being located inside the entrance door. DRB ACTION: Recommended the use of a directory for the building. SRA; ACTION: The SRA felt that a temporary sign should be allowed since it is a major issue of community economics. POPEYE'S MARKET - Market Stall Area Mr. Duhaime advised the Board that the sign will be rude of wood, "S" hooks and eyebolts will be used as a method of attachment. The sign will be 18 x 44 to be hung from the standard iron pole used by all the other tenants in the market area. Color for the sign will be red and green on a white background. The Board recommended the following resubmission revisions on the sign: the sketch of Popeye should be larger and should include part of the torso. The lower • letters on the sign should follow the contour of the sign. The words "POPEYE'S MARKET" should be larger than the other letters. DRB ACTION: Resubmission requested SRA ACTION: No action required Salem • Redevelopment 4-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744-4580 MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD NOVEMBER 26, 1980 The members of the Design Review Board met for a special meeting on November 26, 1980 with the following members present: Robert Scagliotti, Helen Baldwin, Ronald Barnes. The Board reviewed the presentation made by Salem Corporation for a directional sign to be located in various parts of the City in order to provide identity for the East India Mall. It seems apparent to the owners of the Mall that customers coming to Salem by car cannot find the "Mall". The signs are to be the same size as the existing parking signs. Material is to be. the same (aluminum) . Christine Sullivan, economic consultant to the Salem Planning Dept. , noted that she would like to see the signs erected in the City which would help to get the Mall going economically. The signs are very important to the future existence of the Mall. She noted that she will convey to the City Planner the DRB's concern that there are too many signs in certain City locations. • It was suggested by the SRA's Project Administrator that these signs could be installed as temporary signs. Salem Corp. felt that the signs are too expensive to install on a temporary basis. The DRB stated that there is an area of concern in regard to the letter size and the size of the arrow. Helen Baldwin felt that the arrow is the most imporatant element and should be carefully studied. It was agreed that the sign will be studied further and that Salem Corp. will come back with another presentation. Popeye's Market - Salem Market Stall Lynn Marcotte, Market Agent, presented the sketch for Popeye's Market. The Board reviewed the drawing and noted that a decision could not be made at this time since more information is needed in regard to letter typeface, the legality of the use of "Popeye" and method of attachment. • MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD NOV. 26, 1980 Page 2 Newmark Building Rehabilitation - David Jaquith Preliminary drawings were reviewed for the proposed rehabilitation work. David Jaquith noted that the windows will be enlarged and non-operational. The DRB insisted that the owners of the building consider placing something in the windows (similar to the Colonial Men's Store side windows) which will give it a more livelier appearance. DRB ACTION: Approved preliminary drawings SRA ACTION: Approved preliminary drawings Manpower - Front Street building Preliminary review for a sign was discussed by the Board. The owner would like to have a projecting sign for the second floor. A second submission was requested showing the sign, letter typeface, color samples, and method of attachment. DRB ACTION: Resubmission requested • SRA ACTION: No action necessary SALEM SMOKER - Essex Street store The-DRB approved the color for the trim and shutters ( Benjamin Moore 11143) and CB-3 for all other trim. DRB ACTION: Approved SRA ACTION: HANDCRAFTS OF NEW ENGLAND DRB ACTION: Approved the sign submitted SRA ACTION. Approved (by telephone call to each Board Member) SALEM CORP: Directional sign approved by DRB SRA ACTION: Approved (telephone call to each Board member) • Salem Redevelopment 44-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744- 4580 MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD OCTOBER 29, 1980 The Members of the Design Review Board met for a special meeting on Wednesday, October 29, 1980 with the following members present: Robert Scagliotti, Ronald Barnes, Helen Baldwin, and John Wright. Camera Obscura - Sign The Board reviewed the sketch of the sign and the accompanying camera display. After discussion, the DRB agreed they would like to see a drawing of the sign set up to scale and would like to see the mahogany color used in the sign rather than the dark wood. DRB Action: Approved the model of the camera display. A detailed drawing of the sign will be submitted on November 12, 1980. SRA ACTION: Approved Popeye's • Ms. Marcotte advised the DRB that drawings were presented to the Market Area Commission and a decision was made to set up a new lease. The work schedule requires that construction start next Monday, November 3, 1980, completion by December 1, 1980 as per drawings approved. Salem Smoker - 224 Essex Street Chris Olney informed the Board that the Salem Redevelopment Authority has arranged for a grant for the facade of this building. Mr. Olney also advised that the building would not require any major or structural changes but would require a Scope of Work. The DRB reviewed all the items listed on the Scope of Work. After review of the masonry, carpentry and painting work, it was noted that paint for all wooden store- front elements and trim, and paint for shutters, must be approved by the Design Review Board. DRB Action: Approved the Scope of Work, subject to the DRB's discussions on Phase II of this building. SRA ACTION: Approved Progress on the Bernard's Building Staley McDermet presented the most recent drawings of the granite and explained that it was decided to place the granite from the existing shelf angle to the bottom beam and start the new brick four courses lower. Mortar colors were discussed, and • Mr. McDermet proposed that a tan mortar, which has a little orange tone, be used instead of the existing gray-white mortar. • MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD - 10/29/80 Page 2 George Aulson's Building After a field trip to inspect the building, the DRB recommended that the color of the trim should be Oxline #1373 Puritan Stone, and the widow's walk is to be white. DRB Action: As noted above. Also, the DRB requested the removal of the window muntins and deletion of the window blinds. SRA ACTION: Approved *********** *** Compass Press - Sign Permit Mrs. Bea'; informed the Board that an existing sign for Compass Press had been repainted and reinstalled. She further stated that her company was not aware that DRB approval was necessary before repainting. Discussion was held on other signs at the Masonic Temple, and it was felt that the owner of the building should be forced to install a directory. DRB Action: After a field trip'to view the building, the DRB (1) disapproved the sign because it contains too many items of information; (2) would like to demand that the Masonic Temple provide a directory in the vestibule area . of the building; and ,(3) thinks Mrs. Bea should not be required to remove the sign until the Party Line violation is corrected. ************** Note: SRA will wait the legal 60 day time limit - taken under Mall Directories ° advisement. Andy Innes advised the Board that round poles were going to be used for the Mall Directories, but because round poles were unavailable and square poles were cheaper, Mr. Innes asked for approval of the square poles. DRB Action: Approved the square poles for the Mall Directories. Dunkin Donuts - Sign Discussion was held on the Dunkin Donut sign. Chris Olney recommended that the sign be approved with the understanding that the free-standing sign be removed. The DRB agreed. Mr. Olney further stated that in the spring the City will be installing trees and bushes and will be organizing, the parking for this location. DRB Action: Approved the sign as noted above. SRA ACTIN: Approved *************** Salem Fraternity The DRB makes note that Salem Fraternity has put up a new fence and that the doorway under the stairs is being rebuilt which is in violation of the City Ordinance. Respectfully submitted, . Priscilla Welch Salemmm Redevelopment 44-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744-4580 MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD OCTOBER 8, 1980 The members of the Design Review Board met at One Salem Green, Salem, Mass. on October 8, 1980 with the following members present: Robert Scagliotti, Helen Baldwin and Ronald Barnes. The following proposals were reviewed: New England Tel. Co. - new telephone installations The Telephone Company would like to replace, relocate and add public telephones in the downtown area because of vandalism in some instances and others for need of a better locations, In the case of the installation at New Liberty Street, the DRB would want to have it installed within the little park area by the Armory building. . The Board requests the Telephone Co. to install black phones and if the phone at Essex Street (near Bowman Bakery) has to be removed at some future time, it is to be replaced with black phones. DRB ACTION - Approved SRA ACTION: Approved Market Stall Area Handcrafts of New England - The Market Agent presented a sketch for their sign to be made from plywood, script type face and hand painted. The Board disapproved the sign and requested a resubmission including color samples. The Board recommended the use of brighter colors and also recommended a new design for the sign. Since the owner of the operation is planning to have a banner along with the sign, the Market Agent was advised to notify him that two signs are not allowed. A banner with a symbol and a sign is acceptable. The Board stated that a special meeting will be called, if necessary. ieic*ie:F 4eic*&k*icit*ie*��� • MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD OCT. 8, 1980 Page 2 Camera Obscura Mr. Allen Powell presented a sketch of his proposed sign for preliminary approval. The sign will be carved, three dimensional in appearance. The proposed sign is to be a carved camera. At this time preliminary approval is being requested. It was also requested that an extra lighting system be installed by Mr. Powell since it is very dark in that area. The Baord suggested the Market Agent contact the City Electrician to have him replace a number of lights that are not working. Lindauer & Gordon - 14 Lynde St. building Mr. Lindauer presented final drawings for rehabilitation work at 14 Lynde St. He stated that the building will be restored, as near as possible, to the opiginal appearance. The orginal plan called for one apartment at the rear of the building;. -., Since then the plan is changed and the building will be used entirely for office space. • All necessary clapboards will be replaced. Trim color samples will be submitted at a later date. DRB ACTION: Approved construction drawings as submitted subject to any required changes are to be submitted to 'the DRB forfapproval. SRA ACTION: Approved Bernard_'.s - Essex St. Staley McDermet presented a plan for the Bernard's building based on his research. It was recommended that an all wood treatment be used around the windows since that is what was there originally. A meeting is to be held with the owners, the contractor and the SRA's Project Administrator to discuss the best way to handle the situation. It was agreed that, after the meeting, the architect will have a better opportunity to make a decision as to what material could be used on the building. DRB ACTION: Approved the plan submitted SRA ACTION: Approved • t • MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD OCT. 8, 1980 Page 3 IGA - New Derby St. The new owners of Derby Market (IGA) presented a proposal for a new sign which will include the IGA logo. Since the old "First National Sign" will have to be removed, the Board insists that the owners have all the holes left by the sign installation patched to match the existing facade. The Board was advised that the building is to be painted. The owner of the property would like to paint it the same color. The DRB recommended painting the building a warm gray (French Gray) similar to the color on the Salem Five Cents Savings Bank. The SRA's Project Administrator will contact the Attorney for the owner to recommend the paint color. DRB ACTION: Approved the sign as submitted SRA ACTION: Approved aMall Signs The DRB made a field trip to select locations for "Essex Mall Signs". After viewing the particular locations the DRB approved the mall signs : 1. One for One Salem Green On line with building,facades on Essex St. 2. Derby Square - in front of'Derby Square Book! Store 3. Central Street - on north side of Essex Mall in front of Jack's DRB ACTION: Approved SRA ACTION: Approved Market Stall - Antique Store The Board approved the banner to be used at the market stall antique store as submitted. DRB ACTION: Approved SRA ACTION: Approved • Pickering Wharf - Argo Seafood Drawings for the new doorway were approved as submitted. DRB ACTION: Approved r� Salem • Redevelopment 46900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744-4580 MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD WEDNESDAY, SEPT. 24, 1980 On Wednesday, Sept. 24, 1980, the Design Review Board met with the following members-present: Ronald Barnes, Helen Baldwin, Michael McDougall, John Wright and Robert Scagliotti. SALEM MARKET PLACE - signs Baldwin Design presented a new proposal for the "Salem Market Place" signs which are to be located on the market stalls. It was recommended that they should not be just painted on by hand. They should be reproduced from the art work prepared by Baldwin Design. The color recommendation was "off white." The Market Agent noted that she has no objection to the sign presentation. DRB ACTION: (Helen Baldwin refrained from voting) Approved as submitted • SRA ACTION: Approved LYCEUM RESTAURANT NEW ADDITION - John Emerson John Emerson attended the meeting to present drawings for the new addition to the Lyceum Restaurant. At the previous DRB meeting the Board made recommendations for changes in the exterior design, such as, the retention of continuity of the banding from the old addition to the new addition. John Emerson explained that it was his intent to have the new addition different in appearance from the old addition by giving it a totally new treatment. He also noted that the trees in the area are growing quickly and with the location of the grassy mounds in One Salem Green, the view of the building is totally obstructed from view except from one particular area. This has been taken into consideration in the prepara- tion of the drawings. • MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD SEPT. 24, 1980 Page 2 • After review of the drawings presented, the DRB made its recommendations to raise the glass line as high as possible, delete the vertical mullions and butt and silicone the glass, delete the vertical mullions and bring the glass down as low as possible. DRB ACTION: Approved the final presentation with the recommended changes subject to receipt of revised final drawings. SRA ACTION: Approved CAMERA OBSCURA Allen Powell requested approval for the use of bolts as a method of attach- for his sign in the market area. The DRB had no objection to the use of bolts as opposed to using the chain links at"Larry's Famous Hot Dogs" Mr. Powell was also advised that he does not necessarily have to hang his • sign in the same manner as "Larry's" and suggested that he submit something more innovative that would catch the eye of the pedestrians walking along Front and New Derby St. DRB ACTION: Approved method of attachment. SRA ACTION: Approved BERNARD'S The SRA's Project Administrator advised the DRB that work has started on Bernard's Jewelers building. The panels have been removed and it was found that the . brick work will have to be taken down and the wall will have to be rebuilt. The owners of the building feel strongly about keeping the first floor window area the same as it is. They would like to have something started before Winter, which means a design approval will have to be made on the proposed treatment as soon as possible. Staley McDermet completed an architectural study on the building for the SRA some time ago. The drawing submitted was approved. There is enough money for addition work. Allison Crump presented two sketches for possible treatment for the upper floors, leaning toward contemporary design. a After discussion the Board felt that the building is right in between two buildings that have been completely rehabilitated and recommended that Staley McDermet's drawing . be explored and that the first floor should not dictate the treatment for the upper floors. The Board would like to 'see two schemes prepared. for DRB review. Ronald Barnes felt that the matter of time should not demand rushing into a MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING SEPT. 24, 1980 Page 3 quick decision. The matter should be studied carefully. The Board voted to approve the recommendation for Staley McDermet to prepare two possible schemes for DRB review. Respectfully submitted, Ethel C. Crowell F a 0 s . Salem Redevelopment 44-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744-4580 MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD SEPT. 10, 1980 Members of the DRB met at One Salem Green, Salem, Mass., on Wednesday, Sept. 10, 1980 with the following members present: Robert Scagliotti, Helen Baldwin, Michael McDougall and Annie Harris. The following proposals were reviewed: Lyceum - Joan Boudreau The owner of the Lyceum would like to enclose the open patio area for use during the entire year. The number of days it can be used does not warrant keeping the space for outdoor dining only. The space could be used all year. Final construction plans were reviewed. The Board was advised that the windows will not be sliding glass doors as installed in the previous addition. The reasons for fixed glass are for security and energy savings purposes. The roof section will be built strong enough to accommodate the use of the second floor, at some later date, • as an open dining room. Other permits are involved in this aspect. The Board recommended retention of the existing stucco band and should be carried over to the new addition and the same treatment be repeated for the top wooden band. The Board approved the changes in the design with no resubmission required, unless the architect finds a problem with the recommended change, then resubmission is required. DRB ACTION: Approved construction drawings with recommended change in the window design. SRA ACTION: Approved (Joan Boudreau refrained from voting) Market Place Signs - Baldwin Design Baldwin Design prepared final submission plans for the signs based on the DRB's approval at the last meeting. The Market Commission presented a letter advising the Board that it would like to see the signs read "Salem Market Place" since the tenants and the Market Commission commonly refer to the market area as Salem Market Place. In view of the letter received, Helen Baldwin stated that the sign would have to be restudied and redesigned at further expense to the Planning Dept. A special meeting or individual review by DRB members will be required as soon as • the resubmission is ready. • MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD SEPT. 10, 1980 Page 2 Market Stall - stove pipes t,y r The Board reviewed the proposal for a stove pipe/chimney installation for the Antique store and Camera Obscura. After discussion and many recommendations on the best way and safest way to install the stove and stove pipe/chimney, the Board. came to a decision to approve the Metalbestos pipe going through the roof and that it be as close to the peak as is possible,t-hopefully two feet from the peak of the roof (maximum) . The Board is not in favor of seeing guidewires on the roofs. DRB ACTION: Approve installation,of' chimney pipe at the Market Stalls SRA ACTION: Approved Market Stall - paint colors for trim The Board approved the Handcraft trim be painted the same color of the roof . (perfect match) . If this is not possible,the blue color is to be used that is on on the adjacent stall. The Board approved the green trim color for the Fruit, Produce,SStall - to be submitted. Market Stall - air conditioner For the record the Board approved the installation, location, of the air conditioning unit at Camera Obscura which projecting'1 5V" and has been installed permanently for safety and security reasons. DRB ACTION: Approved SRA ACTION: Approved ******** Market Stall - sign pole The DRB approved the sign pole for Camera Obscura subject to it being constructed in accordance with the approved plan provided to the owner of the Camera shop. The DRB disapproved Larry's sign pole since it was not constructed in accordance with the approved plan presented by the architect for Larry's. It was recommended that it be taken down and corrected in accordance with the plan. DRB ACTION: Camera Obscura sign pole approved • Larry's disapproved SRA ACTION: Approved MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD SEPT. 10, 1980 Page 3 Market Stall - pedestrian walkway plan The DRB was advised that the previous plan for the walkway was disapproved and an alternative plan is being submitted for DRB review. The new plan calls for the use of concrete, brick and some cobblestones. The DRB approved the plan as submitted. DRB ACTION: Approved SRA ACTION: Approved Banner for Handcraft Store in the Market Stall The DRB approved the use of the banner, on a smaller scale, and recommended the use of brighter colors for the letters on the banner. The banner will be resubmitted. • T. R. Kerr Furniture Showroom'- sign. C Salem Sign Co. presented a sample "gold" color of the standard letters for the sign. -Letter style is Roman type 18" letters to, be placed 18" from the bottom of the brown painted panel. _ 1 DRB ACTION: Approved SRA ACTION: Approved Federal St. Building - George Aulson - design change k George Aulson wanted to change the window style all along the first floor on the Greenway side of the project. The Board agreed to approve a change on the first floor if, at both bays at either side of the entrance,the center window may be set back from the plane of the existing window (may be a slider) . DRB ACTION: Approved SRA ACTION: Approved . Essex County Building - landscaping The DRB approved the use of Linden trees along Bridge St. SRA ACTION: Approved Ethel C. Crowell a Salem r Redevelopment 4-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744 4580 MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD WEDNESDAY, SEPT. 3, 1980 The members of the Design Review Board met for a special meeting on Sept. 3, 1980 with the following members present: Michael McDougall, John Wright, Ronald Barnes, Helen Baldwin and Robert Scagliotti. The following proposals were reviewed: Chimney for use in the Market Stalls: The Board was advised by the Market Agent that Larry's and the Antique Store would like to install a wood stove and chimney. Theinstallation will be mainly inside the stall. The stack _pipe will go np_the back;inside wall. The chimney will be t6e''required height in accordance with the Code requirements. The Board stated that they would like to see the outside section of the chimney painted to blend in with the color of the roof. The Board requested a drawing showing the location of the chimney. Since it • will be necessary to have a drawing in order to obtain a permit, the DRB will review the drawing at its next meeting (Sept. 10) . DRB ACTION: Approved subject to review of the detailed drawing SRA ACTION: Approved Market Place sign - Baldwin Design It was noted that Helen Baldwin refrained from voting on this proposal. Pictures of the market stalls showing a concept for The Market Place signs to be stencilled on stalls where the signs would be visible from Front and Derby St. The Board was advised that Baldwin Design studied the area and is of the opinion that the area is too small to warrant a pedestrian directory. The store signs can be seen from either end of the market area. The proposed concept would be serving two purposes, pedestrian and vehicle visibility. Lynn Marcotte, Market Agent, felt that the idea is creative but was not happy with the letter type. The locations for the signs have not been firmed up yet since it will be a matter of available money from the Planning Dept. 's budget. • One of the locations suggested,besides the market stalls, would be to stencil the sign on the wall beside the opening from the parking lot into the stall area. DRB ACTION: Approved the concept as submitted SRA ACTION: Approved • • 47 Warren Street.Salem.Massachuset01970'%--%17-745-6250 •ts 0170 617 745E 250 Client Salem Planning Department Community Development Andy Innes Architectural Coordinator Subject Free standing directory to be placed at either end of the Salem market area. After considerable study of the needs of the area, the following is our recommendation: A. A directory is not needed because.. There is no comfortable place in the design of either entrance The area is too small to require a directory. The activity is easily visibly to the passerby. It would add to the clutter which we are trying to eliminate . • This retail area should have a separate and distinctive feeling from Essex Street , the East India Mall and Front Street . B. The name become The Market Place. C. The name be used in such a way as to establish it visually as The Market Place by using the architecture and the surrounding walls . Typeface - Glazer Stencil Bold Color - PMS 482 (off white) Letters to be painted on upper part of shed ends and brick walls. See attached visuals. • . e Salem Redevelopment 4-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE lea-4580 MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD AUGUST 13, 1980 The members of the DRB met at One Salem Green, Salem, Mass. to review the following proposals. Members of the DRB present: Robert Scagliotti, Ronald Barnes, John Wright, Helen Baldwin and John Collins. The DRB discussed all the problems relative to the market stall enclosures in light of the recent article that appeared in the Salem Evening News. The Chairman presented a written statement on behalf of the Board, which they all felt should be a part of the record. (copy attached) The DRB advised the SRA's Project Administrator to notify the SRA and its Attorney about the air conditioning situation; the criteria for the YUM YUM shop has not been followed; the Party Line signs are still up and the DRB is on record that something should be done about it. John Collins stated in regard to the market stalls, it was the intent that the use for the market stalls was not to compete with the downtown stores, they were in- tended to be unique in their use. It is now becoming a shopping center. The DRB Chairman stated that he is getting questions from people on the street as to why they have to comply with the DRB regulations and others do not and a number of things are being done in violation of the design criteria and City Ordinances. It was recommended the members of the DRB make an inspection of the urban renewal area, make a list of all the violations and attend the next SRA meeting of August 25 to express concern. It was noted that the City Solicitor should attend the meeting in order to get an opinion on the extent of enforcement of regulations. Fruit & Produce & Deli - Market Stalls- Dar el_Duhaime The Board reviewed the plans for the remaining vacant stalls. John Collins noted that he would like to see as much of the brick work exposed as possible. A field trip was made with the new tenants to help solve the problem of carpentry work around the brick piers. After an inspection, it was agreed that they will use a smaller window in order to gain shelf space and the- set back will be 31-," setback in the 12 ft. stall . John Collins prepared a sketch of the proposed enclosure showing the use of a bay window which will be flush with the brick pier faces. The other windows to be used will be three sections with the middle window fixed and the other two operational. DRB ACTION: Approved construction in accordance with the John Collins drawing dated 8/12/80 SRA ACTION: Approved MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD AUG. 13, 1980 Page 2 • The DRB noted that there are guidelines to be followed by each of the tenants, as submitted by the Delta Group, for each of the tenants to follow. The tenants should come in with what he needs to make his business operational and the DRB will help him set it up. John Collins felt that there is no need for every enclosure to look the same. There should be some individuality . In regard to the air conditioning system at Larry's Famous Hotdogs, the Market Agent advised the Board that Larry's is of the understanding that he had received DRB approval at the previous meeting. The DRB Chairman noted that no approval was given, nor was any submission made for approval of the air conditioning system. The Lyceum Restaurant - Joan Boudreau - John Emerson 3 John Emerson, architect for the owner of the Lyceum Restaurant, presented a preliminary plan for enclosing the existing open patio area facing One Salem Green. The enclosure height will follow the same rhythm and height as the existing enclosure. The windows will be fixed and sealed for energy saving purposes. There is a possibility of using the second floor area above the new enclosure as an open dining room area. The existing canopy will be used for that purpose,' if it were ,to be approved. • The Board approved the preliminary. plan. Detailed drawings will be submitted as soon as they are ready. DRB ACTION: Preliminary plans approved s m SRA ACTION: Approved (Joan Boudreau refrained from voting) East India Mall Tenant sign Proposal- Salem Sign The Salem Corp. is proposing to create a tenant sign system for the stores located under the arch. Evidently there has been confusion as to where one store starts and where another begins. It was proposed that a color strip be installed for each store (store sign to be located above the window of the particular store) . The color strip will extend from the beginning of the store window to the end window. The next store would have a different color strip, and so on. The letters for each store will be of different letter style. Letters will be illuminated. The color strip and letters will be located on a panel painted brown. It was agreed that Leen's would be allowed to have two signs, due to the corner location. • DRB ACTION: Approved the tenant sign proposal as submitted. SRA ACTION: Approved f + MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD AUG. 13, 1980 Page 3 Andrew Innes of the Planning Dept. noted that the City, is putting out a Request for Proposals for several City owned buildings and would like to have the DRB review the selected proposals for each building. The Chairman noted that the DRB has had problems with Pickering Wharf con- struction and it would not want to be put into the same position and would request full assistance of the Planning Department as to enforcement. The DRB agreed to review the final designs for the buildings. 14 Lynde Street - Heritage Plaza-West The SRA's Project Administrator provided the DRB with a preliminary drawing showing the rehabilitation of 14 Lynde Street which is to be used as office space and one apartment. The DRB approved the preliminary plan as submitted. Washington/Federal Street Condominiums - Phase II • Stephen Tise submitted final construction plans for Phase II. One building will be used for professional offices and the remaining buildings will be for residential use only. A landscaping plan will be submitted for the Washington Street garden area before the work starts. DRB ACTION: Approved the final construction drawings as submitted. S • RA ACTION. Approved 28 Lynde Street - David Jaquith The existing building has been a rooming house for many years. It is proposed to rehabilitate the building which would provide for 6 condominium units. A section.of the siding was removed and it was found that the original clap- boards were removed when the siding was installed. If financial assistance is avail- able the owner would be happy to replace the siding with clapboard. All windows will be replaced with wooden 6 over 6 windows. They will use the deck as a second means of egress since only two units have an existing means of egress. • The DRB recommended the skylight be approved as long as it is lined up with the existing windows. F DRB ACTION: Approved plans as submitted. SRA ACTION: Approved • MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD AUG. 13, 1980 Page 4 Pickering Wharf - Building G It was requested by the operator of the business in building G that a new doorway be approved which is to be used for delivery purposes. It was noted that the door will project out into a public way and that something should be placed near the doorway to keep the people away from the door. It was stated by the owner that no one uses this particular walkway. It is the tendency of the pedestrians to use the wide •Greets along side of the stores. The owner also stated that the main entrance must be manned at all times to keep the customers from going outside the building with beer or wine. DRB ACTION; Doorway approved. v • ' Respectfully submitted, Ethel'C. Crowell . • To set the record straight, the members of the Design Review Board, (DRB) , •responds to the several erroneous statements made in the July 24, 1980 newpaper story by Vincent J. Furfaro, a member of the Market Area and Management Commission. The public records of the minutes of the DRB clearly spell out the following: Feb. 13, 1980: The DRB approved the exterior design for the market stalls to be enclosed at the Market Area. These designs were prepared by The Delta Group who was hired by the City of Salem. The DRB was pleased with the new concept and treatment for the Market Area and the Salem Redevelopment Authority (SRA) Board Members agreed with the DRB and gave its approval to the enclosure designs. May 14, 1980: A potential tenant for market stalls numbered 6 to 11 requested to make modifications to the approved drawings designed by The Delta Group. The original designs required an 18" setback of the walls from the faceofthe brick piers (similar to what was constructed for stalls No. 1 and 2) . To accommodate the space needs of stalls numbered 6 to 11, the DRB agreed with the Owner's request to reduce the 18" setback to only 4", thus allowing more space inside the stalls (not, "only l':le" as erroneously stated by Mr. Furfaro) . At the same meeting another potential tenant for stalls numbered 17 to 20 was advised that they would have to conform to the newly approved •modifications in order to keep continuity in the area. The SRA Board agreed with the DRB and construction started immediately. There was no three weeks delay as erroneously stated by Mr. Furfaro. During the third week of June, unknown to the DRB, construction began at stalls numbered 3 to 5. As a result, two violations against the regulations of the City of Salem were allowed by Mr. Furfaro, who is also a paid City employee as Director of Con- stituent Services . On July 15, Mr. Furfaro call the DRB Chairman and requested immediate approval of a bakery to occupy stalls number 12 to 14. The Chairman requested Mr. Furfaro to submit a drawing indicating the design for the bakery, so as to avoid the same problem as with stalls numbered 3 to 5. Mr. Furfaro was also advised that a special meeting would be called of the DRB so as to expedite the construction of the bakery. The next day - July 16, (not an unnecessary dealy as stated erroneously by Mr. Furfaro) the bakery drawing submitted was reviewed by the DRB and it was discovered that construction had already begun at the bakery stalls. Unfortunately, it was also discovered that the work was not • being constructed as per the drawing submitted. A special meeting was again held on July 23rd, and the proper drawings were sub- mitted and additional corrections were made to the drawings at that time. It was also -2- discovered that 'another set`of .stalls were totbe occupied, which were never brought to the attention of the DRB, but were already under construction. The drawings were ap- proved by the DRB and the SRA Board members were called and gave their approval on July 23rd (with no further delay as erroneously stated) . On July 23rd the DRB visited the Market Area and another serious violation was noted. The Market Commission had allowed the installation of two air conditioners which projected out dangerously on to the public walkway at eye height. It was reported to the DRB that day that a gentleman had, in fact, walked into one of the projecting air conditioners and badly cut his forehead. The DRB was never notified of the air conditioner installations and the minutes of the July 23rd meeting indicates that they are disapproved and should be removed.. It is the intent of the DRB to review designs so that they will conform to the approved guidelines and regulations of the City of Salem. The DRB has no power of enforcement and all final recommendations must be approved by the SRA Board Members. It is unfortunate that Mr. Furfaro does not understand that the design review •process is to protect all .tenants within the Market Area, and hopefully prevent violations to the regulations of the City of Salem. Our records indicate that the DRB and the SRA have had several special meetings to allow for speedy approvals, not to bog them down, as erroneously stated by Mr. Furfaro. The DRB has met with the new Market Agent, and looks forward to a sensible dis- cussion of ideas for the remaining open market stalls. • Salem Redevelopment 44-6900 Author ity ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744-4580 MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD SPECIAL MEETING JULY 23, 1980 The members of the Design Review Board met for a special meeting to review the drawings for the market stall enclosures since time is of the essence for the contractor to complete his work. The following members of the DRB were present: Helen Baldwin, Ronald Barnes, Michael McDougall, John Wright and Robert Scagliotti. The following presentations were reviewed: Market Stall Enclosures for Bakery and ABLE Handcrafts of NEW England The City's Market Area Management Commission Chairman submitted a drawing for the Bakery enclosure and ABLE Handcrafts and asked that the DRB review the drawings individually for approval. The Market Area Chairman authorized the contractor to proceed with his concrete • base for the enclosure without DRB approval. The contractor proceeded to continue building the walls and it was found that they did not conform to the drawing submitted. The DRB Chairman felt that the whole situation should go before the entire DRB. The Contractor, Mr. Toscano, attended the meeting to review the drawing with the Board. After discussion, it was found that the drawing presented did not show the exact way the enclosure is to be built. The Board made a field trip to the market area and voted to approve the drawing as submitted with the exception of the end window. The end window is to be deleted. The newly appointed Market Agent attended the meeting and was advised by the DRB that the approved drawing for Larry's Famous Hotdog enclosure is to be the exarrple for all other enclosures. If there are any variations in regard to construction or recesses, which have not had DRB approval, the tenant will be required to remove the construction to coirply with the approved drawing. A copy of the minutes shall be forwarded to the Market Agent for her record. It was noted by the Board that the present tenants are doing things in the market area that has not been approved, i.e. , two air conditioners behind Larry's have been installed in place and extends out beyond the building into the public way. It was indicated that a pedestrian did walk into the unit and was hurt badly and also, the placement of the air conditioners detracts from the area. I , • MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD JULY 23, 1980 Page 2 The Market Agent was also advised that the DRB requires drawings, elevations and other pertinent data relative to construction when making a submission to the Board. The Market Agent will be provided with the SRA and DRB submission requirements. The Market Agent should notify each tenant that when they are preparing the stain for the enclosure (preservative) prior to application, they should make sure that the stain is well mixed, otherwise the color will not be the same as the other market stalls, i.e. Larry's and Old Town Hall Antiques & Collectables and Camera Obscura are not the same shade due to the fact that they did not completely mix the can of stain. ABLE Handcrafts of New England This enclosure will be adjacent to the Bakery Stall and the construction will be by the same contractor. The additional problem in this area is that the water shut-off beside the market stall must be protected. The contractor cannot begin construction until this matter has been resolved. During the field trip the DRB approved the enclosure construction subject to the sane conditions above and noted that the contractor is to build an access panel with a cover to the water shut-off. The curb is to remain in the same location. He is to contact the Water Dept. as to the size of the access area. It was noted that had the original drawing been follcwed, (i.e., set back 6") this condition would not have happened. DRB ACTION: Approved Bakery enclosure as submitted end window deleted Approved ABLE Handcrafts } Y It was requested that the SRA Board members be contacted for immediate approval since time is of the essence for the Contractor's deadline. `„.: SRA ACTION: Approved (by telephone July 23) March & Martin th&.energy specialists - 66.Washington St. signs The DRB and the SRA approved the orginal submission for the sign and requested resubmission showing the locations for the signs and the banner. The Board approved theLynde St. and Washington St.' locations £orisigns and the location of the solar banner as noted in the drawings submitted: Washington St. centered over window area, Lynde St. over double awning window same height as the Washington St. window, banner will be the 10' requisite above grade. DRB ACTION: Approved SRA ACTION: Approved July 21st meeting subject to DRB approval S MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD JULY 23, 1980 ) Page 3 • 1 Revised plan for Market Area Pedestrian Walk - Andrew Innes of the Planning Departmnt presented a planfor the pedestrian walk area as prepared by the Salem Engineering-Dept. It was noted that the plan follows the sane type of construction as the existing urban renewal area- , sidewalks in regard to broom finish concrete and special edging. The DRB approved the revised plan. The work is proposed to start about Sept. 18, 1980. DRB ACTION: Approved SRA ACTION: Disapproved Market Place Signs - Salem Planning Dept. Andrew Innes presented an iron bracket as recamiended by the Design Review Board at its last meeting. • The DRB agredd, as noted at the last meeting, that the logo used in the sign (Old Town Hall door) did not relate to the Market Place. Reco:rmndations were made relative to a redesign of the sign since they felt that it should be totally redesigned. It was stated that they are not sure that the Old Town Hall door has to be included in the sign. It was suggested that consideration be given to the use of different materials. It is possible to have a circular sign under the arch of the horseshoe bracket deleting the reference to the door and window detail. It was suggested that consider-. ation be given to a painted enairel sign instead of MDO plywood. The following reconuendations were made: Submission of several ideas for the sign; Such'.as a circular sign/semi-circular sign/dropped circle sign The sign should have 1 or 2" clearance around the circle ......_ .Whoever designs the sign should work with the sign maker Ask that the colors dictated by the informational sign should be used overall Prefer that the pipe frame be painted the same color blue. Ask that the individual store signs be either welded or bolted on the face of the sign be changed each time the owner changes. DRB ACTION: Resubmission required • MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING JULY 23, 1980 Page 4 Skylights for 17-23 Front St. building Mr. McDougall, owner of the building, noted that there is not enough light in the upper area (third floor) used for design work. They are considering installing skylights to provide additional light. No firm decision has been made to actually do the work but in the event it is necessary, they would like to have DRB approval. After discussion as to where the skylights should be located, the Board felt that the skylights should not be installed near the dormers which are in public view. The Board had no objection to the skylights being installed on the south side of the'buildingr(Derby Sq. market-area) . Note: Ronald Barnes and Michael McDougall refrained from voting. DRB ACTION: Approved, SRA ACTION: Approved r • j .f 1 Flood lighting for the East.India Square Mall sign 9 ' Salem Corporation is requesting approval to flood light the Church Street sign previously approved by the DRB. The type of flood light to be used will be the same type as the City Electrician used on the Essex Mall. The light will be located in the Kiosk on Church St. and will be installed under the direction of the City Electrician. DRB ACTION: Approved SRA ACTION: Approved by telephone July 23, 1980 *********** Market Stalls - Larry's Air conditioners for Larry's is disapproved - they are to be removed since they are in a hazardous location, they are inappropriate for the area and dangerous to pedesrian traffic. DRB ACTION: Disapproved • SalemME Redevelopment de elopment 44-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 7444580 MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD WEDNESDAY, JLMY 9, 1980 The members of the Design Review Board mat on Wednesday, July 9, 1980 at One Salem Green, Salem, Mass. with the following members present: Robert Scagliotti, Helen Baldwin, Ronald Barnes and Annie Harris. The following proposals were reviewed: Peabody Museum: two signs - one for Charter St. visibility and the other for the front entrance A proposal was submitted for the Charter St. sign to be placed on the side wall of the Red School House building. The Board felt that this would detract from the building and recommended it be placed on a free standing post 8 ft. 6 inches in height with a directional arrow • pointing in the direction of the main entrance. It was also noted that the Museum is having a problem identifying the main entrance,and needs another sign for this purpose. The Board agreed with the concept and the necessity for the two signs. The Museum 's graphic artist, Fred Johnson, will prepare detailed drawings, showing sign dimensi6ns, location, letter style (which they agreed would be the saiTe as the kiosk letters) for SRA approval. DRB ACTION: Approved two signs - resubmission of drawings to SRA required SRA ACTION: (subject to receipt of drawings) - no dwgs. received for SRA meeting *********** Pasquanna Developers, Inc. - Central St. building Since the building will not be rental property, the units are to be commercial/ residential condominiums, there is a change in the deck design on the fourth level. There will be a single deck then a double deck and another single deck. The hopper vent has been taken out and replaced with a single hung window. DRB ACTION: Approved as submitted (Robert Scagliotti refrained from voting) SRA ACTION: Approved MINS OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING • JULY 9, 1980 Page 2 z v Larry's Famous Hotdogs - sign bracket The bracket sign drawing, as prepared by David Jaquith, was submitted for approval. The DRB noted that they will not accept David Jaquith's printed stamp relative to the ownership of the bracket design. The Board approved the bracket-"and noted that they want a capon the end of the bracket loop. 1 q DRB ACTION: Approved SRA ACTION: Approved + Chuck's The restaurant manager stated that a sign is needed for pedestrian traffic coming from Front St. The trees are full and even the Derby Sq. sign is being • covered up. He would like to have a sign for the PUB entrance. The DRB approved the concept of a sign above the entrance to the PUB. Exact location will be determined by the size of the sign. Detailed drawings will be submitted. DRB ACTION: Approved SRA ACTION Concept approved Camera Shop in the Market Stall area - Alan Powell Mr. Powell advised the Board that he needs additional space in the enclosure to accomodate a .custom made cabinet for his display. The original design called for recessing the enclosure 6" from the piers. Others have been building with a 3" in recess. Mr. Powell needs another � inch. The Board made a field trip to the market stalls to look the situation over, and after review of the building, the Board approved the modification of the building enclosure design. The Board reviewed the color samples for the trim and approved B. Moore paint • color Avon Green. DRB ACTION: Approved the enclosure design and trim color SRA ACTION: Approved ******************* MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD JULY 9, 1980 Page 3 March & Martin - energy store for,66 Washington St. The new tenants noted that the building has not gone through any rehabilitation work and at this time it is not known what the owners plan to do. It was proposed to affix a white sign on the-turquoise panel "March and Martin" logo,white.letters on blue. The Board noted that the*telephone number noted on the sign should be renDved. The owners proposed having a carved sign but the Board felt that the logo design did not call for a carved sign and recommended they keep the same colors and have the sign painted. Letters should be edged in black. It was also requested that the DRB approve a sign for the Lynde Street side of the building. The DRB had no objection to this request. Since no detailed drawings were submitted to show location.) of the sign, the Board requested that resubmission of drawings be provided and a special meeting, if necessary will be held. DRB ACTION: Approved Washington St. sign subject to resubmission of location drawings. SRA ACTION: Sign approved • ************* Srmker Store - 242-244 Essex St. building 1 Andrew Innes of the Planning Dept. presented a work write up for proposed rehabilitation work for the building: 1. Clean brick work and granite 2. Rejmve paint (1st floor) 3. Caulk and paint window trim (including dormer) 4. Repair, replace shutters 5. Relocation of downspout, paint gutter dark color 6. Repair snow fence 7. Paint outdoor trim 8. Paint brick store base 9. Remove loose brownstone 10. Replace missing bricks. The color of the shutters and trim was discussed - Allison Crump will take a look at the building and make color recommendations. It was reneded that the replacement of the awning be left for another tip. It might be possible to approach the owner to pay for the replacement. DRB ACTION: Approved the concept of the scope of work • SRA ACTION: Preliminary plan approved MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING ILD JULY 9, 1980 Page 4 • Salem Market Place sign - Andrew Innes Andrew Innes presented a sketch for the Salem Market Place sign. The Board totally disapproved the sign presentation in regard to lettering and spacing and the relationship of the window logo to the rest of the sign. The DRB requested resubmission of a total redesign and recommended that the approved bracket to be used by the tenants in the market stall area be considered for the "Market Place" sign composed of 3;" or 4" I.D. painted galvanized pipe in horseshoe shape. The Board felt that this is an important aspect of the Market Area and in order to do the job in a responsible fashion the Board will hold a special meeting to review a new design proposal. DRB ACTION: Resubmission requested. ***************** Respectfully submitted, • Ethel C. Crowell y y SalemMM Redevelopment 44-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744-4580 MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD WEDNESDAY, JUNE 11, 1980 a The members of the Design Review Board met Wednesday, June 11, 1980 at One Salem Green, Salem, Mass. , with the following members present: Robert Scagliotti, Ronald Barnes, Helen Baldwin and John Wright. The following proposals were reviewed: Larry's Famous Hotdog - sign for the market stalls It was noted that the sign presentation for Larry's was approved by the DRB subject to submission of the method of attachment and a change in the letter type. The letter type was revised and approved A sketch was presented for the proposed bracket. Ronald Barnes felt that the design, as proposed, would not work. A field trip was made and the location dis- cussed. A resubmission will be made. • The Design Review Board had no objection to the installation of an exterior spotlight across from their location subject to the light being approved by the City Electrician. East India Sq. Mall - sign Barry Marcelli, representing Salem Corp. , presented a sign for the Church St. entrance to the Mall. It is proposed to use the same sign that they have on the Essex Mall side of the building with the addition of the work "MALL'..' on the bottom of the sign. The sign will be centered on the lattice wood on the wall closest to the garage. James Field, Parking Garage Mgr., noted that he is considering having a sign installed to identify the garage entrance. They had one at one time but it has been vandalized and beyond repair. The DRB supports the idea of the parking garage having its own identification and recommended a consultant should be hired to study the entire building for the best use of all the sign locations. DRB ACTION: Approved East India Square Mall sign. as proposed. SRA ACTION: Approved • MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD JUNE 11, 1980 Page 2 • Empire Clothing Sign - Salem Sign Company Paul Fannell of Salem Sign Co. made a preliminary presentation for the rear entrance to the store. The sample letter presented was made of stainless steel. The Board recommended that the sign be located above the windows and centered over the doors. W " DRB: No action necessary. e Essex St. New Construction - 264 Essex St. Dr. Rosen's building - CBT Architects presented a preliminary plan (model) for the proposed new building on Essex Street. It was noted that the roof will be expressed as a mansard but the material has not been selected. The building will be faced with brick and the intent is to keep a pedestrian walkway through the building from Essex Street to the parking lot for the retail pedestrian traffic on the first floor. There willbeoffices on the upper floors. The elevator will be located to the far west wall to allow people to walk through the building. DRB ACTION: Approved and supports the preliminary design - SRA ACTION: Approved Essex Street - Proposal for Heritage Plaza West The Project Administrator presented John Collins' proposal for Essex Street. The drawings showed the various areas of open space and pedestrian walkways to continue the north to south pedestrian ways. The DRB requested it be considered to make the public movement stronger going across Essex Street to Barton Sq. going downto':the Post Office building. It was also recommended that the SRA restrict the depth of a new building in the vacant lot on Essex Street to 20 ft. The Board also supports the concept of afountain on the public open space site. It was proposed to keep the existing number of parking spaces but will take about 20 feet from the Essex Street section to create the open space • (Essex and Crombie St.) . • MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD JUNE 11, 1980 Page 3 Frye Building - Staley MCDermet Architect Staley McDermet presented plans for the Frye Building. It is planned to do three sides of the building since it is anticipated that there will be new construction on the vacant lot in the near future. Essex Street will have new store fronts which will be similar to Barnett's store fronts in Heritage Plaza-East. The brick on the front will be restored and will remove the parging (stucco) on the upper floors. The Board noted that it would like to have an option on the removal of the parging, as a last resort, and that taking the parging off and replacing the brick will be a very expensive project and the grant offered by the SRA will not take care of the work. The Board feels that in a matter of appearance to the building the DRB supports the idea of requesting more funding for the work. This is not a totally restoration project. It was noted that all new clapboards will be needed along Barton Sq. and the architect stated that he would try to salvage some of the roof shingles. • DRB ACTION: Approved the drawings presented with recommendations noted. SRA ACTION: Approved Bowman Bakery Building - Essex St. Staley MCDermet presented preliminary plans for the Bowman Bakery building. The top section would be restored and the store fronts below would be retained. The corner section would be recessed to break the front for a doorway to the apartments above. The DRB recommended making the columns wider. DRB ACTION: Approved preliminary plans with recommendation SRA ACTION: • r MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD JUNE 11, 1980 Page 4 • Kerr Furniture Showroom - Chia Ming Sze The invitation for bids has been advertised. One issue is the cost of taking down the panel. Mr. Harris agreed to look at the holes when the sign has been taken down. If nothing can be done, the holes will be filled in where the sign was installed. The Board expressed concern about the panel being removed and the fact that only a portion of the building is to be rehabilitated. DRB ACTION: The Board approved the plans with reservations until other funding comes available to do the entire building. The Board approved the idea of keeping the metal, in fact as a temporary solution only. SRA ACTION: Approved Town Hall Antiques & Collectables • The owner advised the Board that he will have banners four feet off the ground. In regard to paint, the Board recommended that each stall owner select his own trim color. The Board felt that there should be variety in color and everything need not be uniform. Town Hall Antiques & Collectables owner selected a white trim. He will come in with a sign and will try to use the same type of bracket as "Larry's." All exterior siding will be "Sea Shell #90 Cuprinol." DRB ACTION: Approved - SRA ACTION: Approved Stern-rise Final schematics - housing Final. schematics for the 667housing and condominium plans were sub- - mitted to DCA and approved. Discussion is still going on in regard to the exterior treatment. Only minor changes have been made since the first presenta- tion, made a the request of DCA. Seventeen parking spaces for 54 units has been agreed to. There are still some items that have to be resolved. • The Board discussed the location of the "pick up" station for the elderly (on St. Peter St.) . They felt that the entrance to the parking area would better serve the elderly as a "pick-up" station. DRB ACTION: Approved schematics with recommendations SRA ACTION: Approved • MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD JUNE 11, 1980 Page 5 LandscapePlan forBridge, Washington Streets. The Delta Group presented a sketch of the landscaping plan to serve as a buffer for the condominium units along Federal/Washington St. DRB ACTION: The Board approved the street trees as noted in the plan. SRA ACTION: Approved Voyage of the India Star - sign Mary Hyland presented a sample letter for the Pickering Wharf building. The Board felt the letter was too small and recommended 12" letters. DRB ACTION: Approved the 12" letter which is to be evenly spaced two feet • from the top of the arch. Respectfully submitted, Ethel C. Crowell i Salem Redevelopment 44-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744-4580 MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD WEDNESDAY, JUNE 10, 1980 On Wednesday, June 10, 1981, the members of the Design Review Board met with the following members present: Helen Baldwin, John Emerson, Fred Johnson, Annie Harris and John Collins. The Board reviewed the following proposals: PARTY LINE - sign Mr. Robert Shimmer, Pres. of Masonic Temple, the owners of "Party Line", the sign maker, Mr. Dan Tremblay, attended the DRB meeting to try to resolve the problem concerning the sign for the Party Line store on Washington Street in Heritage Plaza-West. Mr. Shimmer asked questions relating to why and how the problem came about. Mr: Shimmer was advised that the sign was put in place by the sign maker without the necessary permit from the City of Salem. The sign is in violation of the Urban Renewal Plan's sign guideline manual, as well as the City's sign ordinance. The SRA's Project Administrator briefed Mr. Shimmer on the SRA's jurisdiction over signs within the Heritage Plaza-West urban renewal area, as well as the sign requirements incorporated in the Plan. It was also explained that the City of Salem has its sign ordinance which they must abide by. The DRB was advised that Party Line was told by the former Building Inspector that a permit was not necessary if they take the existing sign down and put it back up. The DRB stated that the BuilAg Inspector was misinformed since they put the same sign board back up but the sign itself was changed. Mr. Shimmer noted that the SRA and the City is stifling the business community in that they will do nothing about their signs because they were told that if they make any changes in their signs they will have to come before the DRB with a new sign. Mrs. Graffum, owner of Party Line, stated that the sign is fine as far as she is concerned, it says what she has in her store. To her, the advertisement of yoke gifts is important to her business. She needs to say what she has to sell. • MINUTS OF THE DRB MEETING HELD JUNE 10, 1981 Page 2 • The Board tried to convey to Mrs. Graffum that they are trying to help her business. To do so the sign has to be changed and redesigned. The Board is trying to help the business community by seeing that the area is not cluttered up with signs. Mr. Tremblay advised Party Line that he would come back with a sign that would please everyone. Mrs. Graffum noted that she cannot afford to pay for a new sign. Mr. Tremblay agreed to do the sign at no cost to Party Line and requested a time extension of one month. During which time he will work with Party Line and come back to the DRB meeting with a conservative sign (without all the items of information noted on the existing sign) . For the record Mrs. Graffum noted that the SRA should be in touch with all the tenants in the area before they put signs up. DRB ACTION: Resubmittal of new sign SRA ACTION: No action required CENTRAL PLAZA-sign • John Collins presented a proposal for the Central Plaza signs. Four locations were shown on the drawing: east and west elevations, southeast corner and northeast corner for the condominium owners and an address sign "20 Central Street located on the brick pier near the walk up ramp for the tenants in the building. Because of the trees, anything above the branch limb would be lost, so it is recommended that the signs be placed at eye level. The signs are to be painted on wood; Baskerville letters (dark brown)on background, of light brown. It was agreed that a painted sign would be better than placing letters on the brick. With the possibility of vandalism in the area, the sign could be repainted quickly if it were damaged or faded.. DRB ACTION: Approved (John Collins refrained from voting.) SRA ACTION: Approved 667 HOUSING - Power Block (Washington St.) and YMCA (Essex Street) Robert Scagliotti and Frank DeIulis presented a preliminary drawing for the 667 Housing projects for the �Power--Block and the YMCA Building. '11--:- ` Power Block - the entrance to the housing units will be from the parking area in Barton Square. A pedestrian walkway will be extended toward the Joshua Ward House in anticipation of the new developer of the condominium units in Barton Square MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD JUNE 10, 1981 Page 3 possibly extending his walkway along the rear of the Dunkin Donuts building. In this way the total project will be connected to Washington Street/Norman Street. It was recommended that a portion of the parking area be integrated with the adjacent parking area for the new condominium development. The DRB recommended that the walkway from Washington Street to the entrance of the housing units be located between the Joshua Ward House and the Power Building as opposed to using the Barton Sq. entrance beside the "V" Bar. John Collins suggested that the parking area near the entrance be restudied to allow for a small section ;4;.Trere a bench could be located for someone to wait to be picked up. The edge of the driveway could be moved over. The drawings are to be submitted to HUD for final design approval. DRB ACTION: Approved - subject to consideration of the recommendations noted above. SRA ACTION: Approved • YMCA BUILDING - 667 Housing No major changes are planned for the building exterior. The bow window will remain and the existing stairway will remain intact. The entrance to the housing units will be from Essex Street. The "Y" will use the entrance at Sewall St. A new handicap ramp will be installed to the west of the main entrance. Since HUD money cannot be spent on the first floor, it would be up to the "Y" as to what they intended to do with the store entrances on the first floor. The Board felt that the store entrances should be brought back out toward Essex Street. DRB ACTION: Approved SRA ACTION: Approved OLD HERITAGE SALEM SHOP - Market Stall The owner of the shop presented a sketch showing the installation of the air conditioner. It will be 7'6" from the pavement and will extend out 6" from the wall. The brick pier at the corner of the market stall extends out 3" so the total extension to the pedestrian way would only be 3". 9INUT.ES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD JUNE 10, 1980 Page 4 The DRB could see no safety problem. DRB ACTION: Approved SRA ACTION: Approved BARTON SQUARE CONDOMINIUMS - Jerry Baizen The DRB reviewed the preliminary plans for the Barton Square Condo/Townhouse development. At the last meeting of the Board there was noted concern about the pedestrian way being extended out to Norman Street (behind Dunkin Donuts building) . This has been taken care of in this presentation. Also, the window style has been changed. In creating the project, the architect tried to pick up the roof lines of the ''surrounding buildings. The roof line seemed to be the only concern to the DRB. It was recommended that this be restudied by the architect and possibly even consider an extreme treatment instead of the mansard roof presented. John Collins expressed concern about the rotary. He felt that it would not work, and recommended the developer work with the developer of the 667 housing project to try to incorporate a portion of the parking area leading out to Barton Square. It was recommended that probably a rectangular treatment be considered and also capture some of the outdoor space. Mr. Baizen's architect agreed that this would make sense and it would possibly *take care of the zig-zag configuration they now have to the parking area. A sample of brick was submitted. The DRB could see no problem with the selection. John Mansville slate was proposed for the mansard roof. Although, it was agreed that the roof section will be restudied. It was also recommended that the window design for the Townhouses be restudied. John Emerson stated that the' architect might consider treating the top floor windows different from the first floor windows. DRB ACTION: Resubmittal is requested. SRA ACTION: No action necessary The Board reaffirmed the approval of the Mr. Grocer sign replacing the Derby Market sign on New Derby Street. Respectfully submitted, Ethel C. Crowell i . r Salem Redevelopment 44-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744 -4580 MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD ON WEDNESDAY, MAY 14, 1980 The members of the Design Review Boadd met at One Salem Green, Salem, Mass. on Wednesday, May 14, 1980 with the following members present: Rohal-d Barnes, Annie Harris and Michael McDougall . Robert Scagliotti arrived after the meeting was in session. The following proposals were reviewed: G. Aulson's new building on Federal Street As requested by the DRB, Mr. Aulson resubmitted his construction drawings with detailed information. Mr. Aulson agreed that he would enlarge the widdw. walk from 14 ft. to 20 ft. , and the depth will stay the same. He also agreed to line up the windows on the first level with the three upper windows (north elevation) . • DRB & SRA ACTION: Approved detailed draw i ;;;;;; Salem News ' fence - Front Street property The SRA's Project Administrator submitted a proposal for the Salem News ' fence. It was noted the purpose for the fence is mainly for security reasons . After review of the fence sketch, the Board felt that if someone did get over the fence no one would be able to take notice of the fact since the spacing is too narrow. The Board recommended a resubmittal of something that would be more appropriate. It was suggested as an alternative that the News could block off the two back sections to prevent vandalism and then landscape the front area to leave the new building open to view. Since no one from the News attended the meeting, Mike McDougall agreed to talk to Mr. Newbegin of the Salem News to see if he could resolve the matter. 298-302 Essex St. - Jack Levin Mr. Levin submitted a sign for his new tenant, Dr. Alvin Rosen. He noted that previous signs had been approved for the building but now his new tenant would like to replace the approved sign with a bronze plaque 26'' x 10" worded as follows: PRACTICE LIMITED TO DR. ALVIN ROSEN PERIODONTICS MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD MAY 14, 1980 Page 2 • The Board recommended -that the words "Practice Limited To" be eliminated and the letters could be somewhat smaller. DRB ACTION: Approved subject to rearranging the letters and making the letters smaller. SRA ACTION: APPROVED DERBY SQ. MARKET STALLS "Larry' s Famous Hotdogs" is a potential tenant for a portion of the market stalls. It is proposed to use stalls '#6 to 11 (left side facing Derby St.) . They would like to make a modification to Collins' drawings. .. It was proposed to use Anderson Windows (3 x 5) , 6 inch vertical ship lap pine boards, recessed to expose the columns. He is planning on air conditioning since the windows will be fixed. There will be no need for exhaust fans since he will not be frying any food. It was recommended he paint the windows with opaque stain. Four out of the • six bays will have windows, two.Will have doors (as required by the .Building Inspector's office) . It was agreed that Andersen 3N5 windows will be used with M-124A Brosco doors, 6 inch vertical ship lap pine boards (stained) and end walls will be brick to match the existing brick work. "Sea Shell" weather stain ST 90 Cuprinol will be used for the pine boards. Hardware will be submitted when selected. DRB ACTION: Approved SRA ACTION: APPROVED . Market Stalls 17-20 Antique store is proposed for market stalls 17-20. The tenant was advised that he would have to conform to the approved treatment noted above in order to keep continuity in the area. He was advised that the brick work will have to be matched to the existing brick work. DRB ACTION: Approved SRA ACTION: Approved MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD MAY 14, 1980 Page 3 • The Project Administrator advised the Board that another possible tenant (a bakery) will be coming in with a proposal . Kerr' s - Chia Ming Sze Chia Ming Sze presented drawings for facade work on the Kerr building. He proposed painting over the green panel and locatinga_new sign on the painted section and removing the revolving sign. The upper levels of brick will be cleaned up and repointed, if necessary. It was recommended to Mr. Harris that plywood be installed in back of the upper floor windows, painted black, to help him with his energy problem. Mr. Harris had indicated that he is having a problem with so much sunlight coming in the windows upstairs. It was also suggested that the window trim be painted off-white. The large metal panel will be painted tan. The awning will have to be replaced. • The DRB discussed the possibility of finding out what is behind the green panel . The SRA' s Project Administrator agreed to. look into the situation to see if he can find a way to see what is behind the metal before going ahead with the bid process. Note: After looking into the situation, the Project Administrator could not see behind the panel and recommends that we wait until the sign is removed and then possibly the holes from the sign installation will show what is there. DRB ACTION: Approved as submitted, subject to what is revealed under the green panel after the sign is removed. SRA ACTION: Approved Stern-Tise - 667 Housing Steve Tise advised the Board that he is. in the process of completing a housing package for submission to DCA. DCA has reduced the number of units from 60 to 54. The setback has also been increased along St. Peter Street which reduces the number of condominiums. The issue that was raised at the SRA meeting is that DCA has insisted on certain exterior materials (either stucco of "Drive- It") . • It was indicated to DCA that either material violates the criteria in the i MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD MAY 14, 1980 Page 4 Urban Renewal Plan but DCA stipulated that they would not pay for any material that would increase the construction costs . After review of the preliminary sketches provided by Stern-Tise, the DRB stated that they would not accept anything less than brick in the construction of the building. Stern-Tise noted that they will come back with fully developed drawings after they have been submitted to DCA. DRB ACTION: Disapproved the use of any other material other than brick. SRA ACTION: Approved Art Colloquium - Concert Banner - Gallery Banner Toby Atlas submitted sample colors for the Concert and Gallery banners which they thought would be set between the first and second floor windows as opposed to using the flag poles. The banners will be held with grommets' with a line to the lower windows to hold them in place. • The Board agreed that they should try both methods to see which one would work best. DRB ACTION: •Approved both concepts for trial . SRA ACTION: Approved Beef & Oyster Restaurant - Arthur Ingemi The Beef & Oyster Restaurant will be under new management shortly and they will be closed for interior renovations. The new owners would like to install a canopy over the Washington Street doorway out 6 feet onto Washington St. They also propose to have outdoor dining on Washington St. A sketch was provided to show the Board how the dining area would be arranged. The Board advised Mr. Ingemi that there are two issues to be considered. First, the canopy would be over public property which would require Council approval . Secondly, the open dining area is also proposed for C'ity owned property which will require City approval . Before the DRB could make a decision, it would be necessary to have all of the above noted approvals or permits . DRB ACTION: Approved the total concept - resubmission will be required after City approvals are optained 0 SRA - No action necessary I MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD MAY 14, 1980 Page 5 • Dante' s - Arthur Ingemi Mr. Ingemi advised the Board that the Deacon Giles sign is to be changed to Dante's. The Board agreed Mr. Ingemi could adhere a piece of 1/2'' thick hard wood over the existing name, repaint the wood (which is to have a smooth round edge) to read Dante's, painted red with gold leaf letters, black outline around the letters . DRB ACTION: Approved SRA ACTION: Approved Parking/Direction Signs for Downtown Salem Planning Dept. Andrew Innes of the Salem Planning Dept. presented a proposal for downtown signs. The International Parking symbol was proposed for the downtown area and other areas of the City (blue background with white letters P, with left, right arrows. . For the downtown direction signs the Planning Dept. proposed to use the signs prepared by Venturi ..:) The signs will be suspended in the same manner that they are used in other areas of the City. The signs presented where green or blue background. The DRB preferred to see the signs in blue. Same sign will be used for tourist info. DRB ACTION: Approved with blue background for direction signs - tourist signs. Approved the international parking symbol SRA ACTION: Respectfully submitted, Ethel C. Crowell r Salem Redevelopment 44-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744 .4580 MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD WEDNESDAY, APRIL 9, 1980 On Wednesday, April 9, 1980, the members of the Design Review Board met at One Salem Green, Salem, Mass., with the following members present: Robert Scagliotti, Helen Baldwin, Ronald Barnes and Michael McDougall. The Board reviewed the following proposals: George Aulson/David Jaquith - New Construction —Office Building on Federal St Mr. Aulson submitted revised drawings as requested by the DRB. The drawings showed the additional window over the front entrance as well as the side windows backed with plywood painted black. After review of the drawings submitted, the Board felt that more detailed infor- mation should be included on the drawings, i.e. dimensions, material, both entrances • should be detailed since they are both visible from the outside. It was recommended the Board approve the concept in order that Mr. Aulson may be able to obtain his building permit. The Board would like to see more detail on the drawings for the following items: The brick header course under the air conditioning units; detail of the gambrel roof wood trim; wood railing around the airdonditioning unit on the roof; pediments over the windows; returns on the dormer sections; show elevation of the louver; detail of the downspouts. Mr. Aulson noted that any flashing that shows will be baked enamel. It was requested that this be shown on the plans. DRB ACTION: Resubmission of detailed drawings requested. SRA ACTION: No action required. Salem Evening News The Project Administrator advised the Board that the Salem News wants to go ahead with its plans for landscaping and fencing around the Front St. parcel. The News did • look into the tubular steel fencing recommended by the DRB and found that the cost would be prohibitive. The SRA Project Administrator described the type of fence that was •MINUTES OF UIE DRB MEETING - APRIL 9, 1980 Page 2 proposed by the News (closed type) and noted that the News will come in with a proposal as soon as they have further information. The DRB stated that they would prefer to have an open type fence on that particular parcel so that the public may be able to see what is going on inside the building. That is the reason the building was constructed with large windows. NO ACTION REQUIRED ********** Party Line - Roberta Graffum and Nancy Black At the request of the Design Review Board the owners of Party Line attended the meeting to discuss the installation of their sign without DRB approval and without the sign maker obtaining a City sign permit. The DRB Chairman explained the reason for sign control and that the DRB is here to help them in developing a readable sign. The owners of the store advised the Board that they cannot afford to have the sign removed and replaced with another new sign. • It was recommended that they first speak to the owners of Masonic Temple since they are at fault for allowing a sign to be put up on their building without first making a presentation to -the DRB and also, putting the sign up without a sign permit. The DRB requests the SRA to have its Attorney (George Vallis) notify the Masonic Temple of the two violations. The Board advised the owners that if the DRB does not hear from Masonic Temple, it will have to take legal action, since they have had enough time to correct the problem. *********** . . .. . .... .. Windmills - 'Elyse Cotant The Board was advised by Elyse Cotant that she did not see the approved sign until after it was approved by the DRB, and after looking at the sign, she felt that it was not a readable sign. A new presentation was made for a 20 x 16 sign with smaller typeface letters. The DRB did not approve the new sign and advised the owner that the sign is less readable with the smaller letters and that the letters are too close together and would not be readable from the parking lot across the street. After looking at the sketch of the first sign, the Board felt that the letters •should be studied and the letters should be correctly spaced. It was requested that Salem Sign Co. submit a revised sketch with the letters properly spaced. *********** • MINU'T'ES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING - APRIL 9, 1980 Page 3 Art Colloquium - Toby Atlas The DRB was advised that they would like to hang colorful banners on the Old Town Hall building in Derby Square as a means of advertising. One banner will be for the gallery and the other will be hung out when they plan to have special events. The special event flag would be hung up about two weeks before the event starts. It is their feeling that the banners are needed to direct people into Town Hall. Preliminary sketches were presented to show possible color schemes and lettering that could be used on the banners. The banner would be about 4 ft. by 6 ft. and the material would be poly-cotton. The two banners would be made up in different color schemes for purposes of identification. It was recommended by the DRB that a banner hanging across the front of the building, indicating the type of event, would send the message out to the public. The Board was also advised that the actual ordering of the banners would be dependent on being funded by the City. At this time it was not known just where and how much money would be available for this purpose. The DRB approved the banner concept and recommended resubmission after the Art Colloquium is able to find out where the funds would be coming from to pay for the banners. No action necessary ************ Pickering Wharf - Robert Bramble A letter from the City Solicitor, William Tinti, was read noting that in his opinion the DRB still has jurisdiction over the design of the Pickering Wharf Project. Mr. Bramble attended the meeting to go over a number of issues as set forth in the minutes of past DRB meetings. Mr. Bramble explained to the Board that the construction work will be completed within.60 days and he would like to see it through to that stage and anything that takes place after that will be done through the new site manager. After construction work is done the carpenters will clean everything up, including the dumpsters. He noted that one of the air conditioning units has been enclosed. Mr. Bramble also noted that Phil Briggs of Add Inc. is no longer engaged by Pickering Wharf and he realizes there are a number of issues that have not been resolved such as the dumpsters, a new sign manual will have to be developed - enforcing and adherence to it. • MINUTES OF UIE DRB MEETING HELD APRIL 9, 1980 Page 4 Mr. Bramble was advised by the Board that they do not expect to see a revised sign manual made up to suit the signs that are already there in violation of the sign manual. The Board would like to see drawings for the air conditioning fences, gas meters, etc. The matter of awnings will have to be resolved. The DRB Chairman noted that the largest issue is the construction of the tower since it was not built in accordance with the approved drawings. Mr. Bramble stated that he is not aware of that issue and he will need time to get background information before discussing the matter further. . It was noted that a hedge was supposed to be put in place to screen the parking area. Mr. Bramble stated that he would respond to these items in writing and he would like to have additional time for discussion of the tower and the awnings. It was agreed that all these matters will be discussed at the next DRB meeting ( May 14, 1980) and that from now on any changes of any nature will come before the DRB. Respectfully submitted, Ethel C. Crowell a Salem Redevelopment 4-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744-4580 MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD WEDNESDAY, MARCH 12, 1980 The members of the Design Review Board met for its regular meeting at One Salem Green, Salem, Mass. with the following members present: Helen Baldwin, Annie Harris, John Wright, Ronald Barnes,Michael McDougall and Robert Scagliotti. The following presentations were reviewed: Engine House - Lafayette/Derby Street - David Walsh Mr. Walsh and the owner of Pelletier's Shade shop attended the DRB meeting at the request of the DRB and the SRA to discuss the installation of the awnings without DRB approval. The Board was informed by the owner of Pelletier's that he was not aware of the • fact that DRB approval was necessary. He did talk to the Asst. Building Inspector and was informed that a bond would not be necessary. He also..thought that no other approval was necessary including the DRB and City Council approvals. He was not prepared to submit sketches of the existing awnings at this meeting but agreed to attend the next meeting of the DRB and will bring along detailed sketches. The owner of the shade shop was provided with maps of the Heritage Plaza-East and West areas as well as the sign manual and sign presentation requirements. DRB ACTION: No action required O'Brien's Ambulance, Inc. - Salem Laundry Building The DRB rejected the preliminary presentation and recommended revising the sign. In order to expedite approval, the Board agreed to make an individual review of the revised sign as soon as it was submitted to the SRA office. Based on a revised submission and individual review by each DRB member available, the Board approved the revised sketches showing the sign to be located over the garage door at the Salem Laundry building on the Lafayette St. side. The lettering on the sign is to be one continuous line and the sign board is to be rectangular with no adorn- ment stating "O'Brien's Ambulance, Inc. ." DRB ACTION: Approved • SRA ACTION Approved 'z. I RB MINUTES - MARCH 12, 1980 Page 2 g �I MD - Change in the Big "L" logo The Board rejected the preliminary submission for the- color combination and requested resubmission. The Board agreed that Helen Baldwin would review the re- vised submission for approval. Based on Helen Baldwin's review the presentation was approved as submitted. The sign on the Essex Mall (near Washington St.) will be repainted and the other sign on the Mall (next to Singer's) will be replaced by MD. DRB ACTION: Approved SRA ACTION: Approved Essex Art Gallery - Masonic Building Mr. Robert Flagg presented a sketch of the banner showing an art "brush" with the words Essex Art Gallery located within the brush lines. Helen Baldwin felt that the sign did not read well and should be restudied. She •felt that the lettering was too tight. Mr. Flagg noted that a similar logo is used in Houston and it works well. The Board advised Mr. Flagg that he could use a temporary sign until his sign was approved and ready. Mr. Flagg stated that time is of the essence and that his budget is small and he would like to get a sign up there for the opening. A temporary sign would be an added cost. The Board stated that they are in favor of the banner but it is not reading well and the colors are too close to the same colors used by the "Party Line" store. It was recommended that he use a dark brown with white and restudy the lettering. The Board agreed to have a special meeting or they will come to the SRA office as soon as the drawings are ready. DRB ACTION: No action necessary at this time Note: After resubmission for "Essex Art Gallery" DRB members reviewed the revised sign (eliminating the brush on the banner) showing just "Essex Art Gallery" lettering. • Approved by the DRB subject to the three words being pulled closer together. SRA ACTION: Approved as recommended • MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING - MARCH 12, 1980 Page 3 Pickering Wharf - Michael Moniz The principal owners of the Pickering Wharf project attended the meeting to go over all the controversial issues relating to design, signs, etc. that are not in compliance with DRB approval. The Chairman referred to Add Inc. 's letter of Oct. 23, 1979 listing the issues that were not approved by them or by the DRB. It was agreed by all parties that they .would review the letter and the DRB minutes prior to the next DRB meeting so that each issue may be addressed intel- ligently. The DRB discussed its role of responsibility, as required by the City's agree- ment with Pickering Wharf, and felt that the City Solicitor should review the agreement; provide the Board with his opinion as to DRB responsibility; and how the DRB's recommendations may be enforced. George Aulson - Federal St. Building - David Jaquith Mr. Aulson's architect David Jaquith presented a sketch for design change • from the original approved drawing. The design change showed a Gambrel style building, 6 over 6 windows - mainly of brick construction with a concrete lintel over the store front which will be used for sign locations. It is proposed to use wood blinds on the second and third floor windows. Air conditioning units under the windows will be installed flush to the brick work. The air conditioning compressor for the third floor will be encased within a "widow's walk" on the roof. The windows on the side facing the courthouse building presents a problem since the code restricts the window installation on a public way. Mr. Aulson was advised that windows could be.installed_on the second level with _a plywood sheet behind the glass,_Ranted black. Mr. Aulson agreed todoing_the work. _ Annie Harris noted that something is missing within the middle section of the drawing over the doorway. It seems too open. A recommendation was made to install a'.win- dow. It was agreed that a window could be located above the entrance doorway. The Board requested a resubmission showing a redesign of the middle section over the doorway; redesign of the building showing alternative and interchangeable material treatment for the first floor showing the use of concrete brick and panels as well as the treatment going around the corner of the building. The Board reviewed the brick samples and approved "Heritage S - K - F Brick Co. • DRB ACTION: Approved brick sample Requested resubmission of design SRA ACTION : No action required MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD MARCH 12, 1980 page 4 • Windmills - John Plummer - Salem Sign Co. The DRB rejected the original sign proposal and requested resubmission. Salem Sign and Mr. Plummer attended the meeting. Mr. Plummer stated that he intends to bring the latest technology on energy improvements to the customer. The store location was chosen due to the fact that it is surrounded with stores catering to home improvement materials, i.e, paints, hardware, plumbing, etc. He would like to keep the store low key and is not interested in using a windmillias a sign. It is not his intent to razzle dazzle the operation. The Board reviewed the original sign submission and noted that the letters and the spacing need to be restudied. After many suggestions as to the wording for the sign, it was agreed it should read "Windmill's, The Energy Store." The Board was advised that "The Energy Store" is already being used by another company. Salem Sign will revise the sign and the DRB members agreed to come in to review the submission as soon as possible in order to expedite approval. DRB ACTION: Resubmission requested Note: Resubmission made and approved by the DRB and SRA Boards • East India Square - banners A sketch of the banners proposed for the East India Sq. building was submitted along with color samples for the banners. The banners will be anchored at the base so that they will not be blown around, tied to a bar and tied to the building. DRB ACTION: Approved SRA ACTION: Approved L. H. Rogers - Harriet Goldberg The Board was advised that L. H. Rogers would like to locate gift carts on the Mall. It would be manned during the daytime and stored in the garage at night. Only small gift items will be sold. The only accessory on the cart will be a brown and white awning, L. H. Rogers' colors. DRB ACTION: Approved SRA ACTION: Approved • f • MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING - MARCH 12, 1980 Page 5 YUM - YUM - paint color for Derby Sq. Market Stall The owner of the YUM YUM stand in the mall area agreed to paint the wooden sections. A color chart was presented and the Board made a field trip to select a color from the chart. It was agreed that sample ST-58, Benjamin Moore paint would be appropriate. DRB ACTION: Approved ST-58, Benjamin Moore Paints. SRA ACTION: Approved Respectfully submitted, Ethel C. Crowell s y. r Salem MM Redevelopment 4-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744-4580 MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD WEDNESDAY, FEB. 13, 1980 On Wednesday, Feb. 13, 1980, the members of the Design Review Board met at Old Tann Hall, Derby Square, Salem, Mass. with the following members present: Robert Scagliotti, Helen Baldwin, John Collins, Annie Harris, Ronald Barnes and John Wright. The Board held its annual election for the office of Chairman and Vice-Chairman. Robert Scagliotti was nominated for the office of Chairman. Motion was made and seconded and unanimously voted Robert Scagliotti serve as Chairman for a one year term. Ronald Barnes was nominated for the office of Vice-Chairman. Motion was made and seconded and unanimously voted Ronald Barnes serve as Vice Chain for a one year term. • The following proposals were reviewed: O'Brien's Ambulance Service - Salem Laundry Building Portelanoe Siem Co. reviewed the 32" x 48" inch projecting sign, "Bold" type lettering. The sign, as proposed would be 2" dressed Redwood, red enamel finished in 23K Cold Leaf, located above the garage door at 37-41 Lafayette St. , pinned to the brick building with lag screws and braced at the bottom to prevent swinging. Helen Baldwin felt the sign to be inappropriate and too large. It was recommended that it be placed flush against the building. After discussion the Board felt that they would like to see one long sign with 18" letters placed above the door. The Board requested resubmittal. DRB ACTION: Resubmission requested SRA ACTION: No action necessary Peabody Museum - Beth Pollack The Board was advised that the;. Museum staff is having a problem directing visitors to the entrance in the new wing. They would like to replace the existing sign on the chain link fence with a larger sign (10 ft.) to direct visitors to the front entrance on the Mall. 0 a • MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Page 2 Feb. 13, 1980 They would like to install flags also at some later date. The important thing right now is the directional signs. Ronald Barnes noted that he would rather see banners rather than flags. John Collins felt that flags along the Mall would cut the mall down visually. The Board felt that this should be carefully thought out because other 9 businesses in the Mall would also want to have a sign showing the direction to their stores too. Helen Baldwin noted that she would not approve any other sign other than that of the Peabody Museum. The Board was advised by C. Olney that the City has engaged a firm to do do mapping for the downtown establishments. 0 The Peabody Museum agreed to come in with a detailed presentation for the next meeting. SRA ACTION: No action necessary Additional doorway at the East India Square nell • The new tenant for the East India Square shopping mall, due to the size of the store, is required by the Building Inspector's office to have a second means of egress. The store would not have enough spare along the mall area to accon mdate another doorway. The store will be narrow. The Board was concerned that other stores along the Essex Mall will also want to have a doorway and a precedent will be established. The Board approved the additional doorway as designed, no hardware on the exterior of the door and panic hardware installed on the inside of the door. The Board agreed that the design is one that could be repeated along the Mall. No signage of any kind will be placed on the doonaay. DRB ACTION: Approved with conditions noted above SRA ACTION: Approved Big L - Salem Sign Co. The Board was advised that the Corporation has changed and has been bought by "MD" - Mall Drug. All the stores will be required to change the logo. An ad- vertising agency has changed the concept. The color scheme is dark brown, white and orange, 3 ft. by 4 ft. MiNMES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD FEB. 13, 1980 Page 3 The projecting sign on the Essex Mall will be repainted to the new logo. They would like to have a projecting sign on the other store on the Mall. The Board felt that it would be better to have a sign flush against the building rather than a projecting sign .and they would prefer to see more brown and less white and cut the size of the letters down. The Board agreed that a sketch be submitted to Helen Baldwin for her review and approval. DRB ACTION: Approved the reduction in the size of the letters and more brown around the MD - to be reviewed by Helen Baldwin. Existing projecting sign to be repainted and the other sign on the Mall to be placed flush against the building. SRA ACTION: Approved subject to conditions noted Windmill - The Energy Store - Salem Laundry Building • A preliminary presentation was made by Salem Sign Co. The Board rejected the proposal submitted and recommended that Salem Sign present its suggestion of having a windmill located on the building. Stern-Tise - Phase II - Housing Stern-Tise presented its preliminary plan for phase tzvo showing the duplex concept and the elimination of the Federal Street entrances. They would like to continue the greenway concept along the front of the buildings onto Washington St. It was also proposed that a portion of the complex be used for office use under a turn key process. The building would be used for lawyer's offices. DRB ACTION: Approved the preliminary drawings. SRA ACTION: Approved Lyceum grill - for the record After Ronald Barnes reviewed the proposal to locate a grill in the Lyceum • Restaurant (in the patio wall) and had no objection to the grill or the location, he approved the proposal. The Building Inspector's office required the need for a grill due to the air flow complications. DRB ACTION: Grill and location approved as submitted SRA ACTION: Approved MIN= OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD FEB. 13, 1980 Page 4 • Pickering Wharf The Board discussed the situation concerning the Pickering Wharf project and all the things that have been going on down there without DRB approval. It was recom ended that a letter be sent to the Mayor noting the DRB's concern and that the letter list all of the things that have not been approved. Engine House Awning The Board felt that the SRA's attorney should write a letter to them notifying them that they have not conplied with the sign ordinance and that the awning installed did not have DRB approval. Essex Mall lighting The DRB recommended that a letter be sent to the SRA asking that the lights on the Mall be removed that were installed for the &nas season. Party Line The DRB requested that the Project Administrator contact the owner of the Party Line store to come before the DRB with a new sign presentation. Market Stall Area - Delta Group The Delta Group has been engaged by the City to prepare exterior designs for a produce operation in the first eight stalls. The design will be in-fill between the piers. Entry will be at the first stall, the rest of the space will be enclosed. It will consist of all wood infill with bay window projections. DRB ACTION: Approved the preliminary drawings as presented. The Board was quite pleased with the new concept and treatment for the stalls. SRA ACTION: Approved It was also noted that the lease for the YUM YUM shop is being negotiated and they will be required to change the color of the wood when they open up next year and the sign will have to be resubmitted. Respectfully submitted, • Ethel C. Crowell a Salem Redevelopment 44-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744-4580 MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD JAN. 24, 1980 Robert Scagliotti and Ronald Barnes attended the special meeting of the Design Review Board to review the proposed sign for "East India Square." Mr. Marco `Otti_eri4made a presentation for Salem Corp. on behalf of the East India Square owners. The proposed sign is to be 8 ft. x 8 ft. and will be located flush against the large brick wall neat the entrance to the shopping area. The proposal did not include the word "Mall." After discussion, it was agreed the word "Mall" would not be necessary. It was also proposed that three banners be installed along the front end of the building near the brick wall since the flag poles are already in place. The banners would be staggered so that they would stand out as individual flags. The Board approved the concept of banners subject to review of the color samples and material before installation. • In regard to the sign the elephant in the sign will stand out on a field of red (in relief) enamels and yellow will repre§ent:..rgilding. .Lettering will be ensized in the blue field and edges will be gilded. The brown background of the elephant will be a mat semi-sandpaper finish rather than a mottled finish. The Board members present approved the sign as proposed subject to other members of the DRB coming in to review the proposal and subject to submission of a plan showing the location of-the sign on the building. Note: John Wright reviewed the proposal Jan. 28 and approved the sign as recommended and approved the concept of banners for the building. DRB ACTION: Approved sign as submitted with conditions noted above. SRA ACTION; Approved • • Salem Redevelopment edevelo nt 44-6900 p e Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744 4580 MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD NOVEN)BER 14, 1979 The members of the Design Review Board met on November 14, 1979 with the following members present: Robert Scagliotti, Ronald Barnes, Annie Harris, to review the following proposals: Sign for:Berkal,Stelman & Davern - legal offices Mr. Portelance of Portelance Sign Co. submitted a proposal for a directory sign listing the names of the lawyers in the building at 26 Lynde Street. The sign would be Redwood painted Kyanize Colonial Blue to match the existing sign and building. Caslon Italic letters (under two inches) to be located 43" from edge of the house to the window casing. The name plates on the sign will be interchangeable. It seems as though they are having an identification problem since some of the newer members of the team are not known locally. The Board recommended that redwood be used and oil base paint to prevent • peeling. DRA ACTION: Approved SRA ACTION: Approved Antique Store - Salem Laundry Building (R & R Woodworth) The sign (20" x 102") was prcposed..with 9" letters for ANTIQUES and 3" letters for R & R. Woodworth. A far as location is concerned, the DRB would rather see the sign placed below the fan window on the same plane as the vertical mullion (inside) . It was requested that all other signs be taken down (sign in the window, etc.) . DRB ACTION: Approved flush or set back 1" from mullion. SRA ACTION: Approved Brandy's The DRB approved the drawing with the deletion of the roof over the stairway • (drawing dated 10/25/79) and eliminate the four light poles at the second level along the planter line. Respectfully submitted, Ethel C. Crowell Salem _ t - � 'Redevelopment 4-6900 uthority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744-4580 MLNUTE,S OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 14, 1979 The members of the Design Review Board met on November 14, 1979 with the following members present: Robert Scagliotti, Ronald Barnes, Annie Harris, to review the following proposals: Sign for:Berkal,Stelnan & Davern - legal offices Mr. Portelance of Portelance Sign Co. submitted a proposal for a directory sign listing the names of the lawyers in the building at 26 Lynde Street. The sign would be Redwood painted Kyanize Colonial Blue to match the existing. sign and building. Caslon Italic letters (under two inches) to be located 43" from edge of the house to the window casing. The name plates on the sign will be interchangeable. It seems as though they are having an identification problem since some of the newer members of the team are not known locally. The Board recomTended that redwood be used and oil base paint to prevent peeling. DRA ACTION: Approved SRA ACTION: Approved . Antique Store - Salem Laundry Builth:pg (R & R Woodworth) The sign (20" x 102") was proposed with 9" letters for ANTIQUES and 3" letters for R & R. Woodworth. A far as location is concerned, the DRB would rather see the sign placed below the fan window on the same plane as the vertical mullion (inside) . It was requested that all other signs be taken down (sign in the window, etc.) . DRB ACTION: Approved flush or set back 1" from mullion. SRA ACTION: Approved Brandy's The DRB approved the drawing with the deletion of the roof over the stairway (drawing dated 10/25/79) and eliminate the four light poles at the second level along the planter line. Respectfully submitted, Ethel C. Crowell Salem Redevelopment 44-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744-4580 MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD OCT. 24, 1979 The members of the DRB met at One Salem Green October 24, 1979 with the following nPa11diers presents Ronald Barnes, Annie Harris and Michael McDougall, to review the following proposals: Brandy's The architect for Brandy's, Phil Winter, discussed the revised working drawings for the deck. The Board was advised that they have a letter from the Dept. of Interior allowing Brandy's to use one foot of its land for a stairwell. As requested by the DRB at the last meeting, they have changed the location of the planters to line up with the existing planters. Structurally, the deck will be inde- pendent from the existing building. The DRB recommended that they use heavier columns than the proposed 4 x 12's as • noted in the drawing. In regard to the walkway, the Board felt that it is too narrow. The Board was advised by Mr. Collins that Pickering Wharf made an agreement with the City to keep a walkway completely around the project for the benefit of the public even though the property is entirely private land. Ron Barnes noted that he would like to see an addition that looks like it belongs to the building instead of looking as though it was something that was added on to it. Mr. Collins, one of the owners of Pickering Wharf, stated that he sees no problem with ,the plans and the addition would not be a detriment to the project and they would not allow it if it was not economically feasible. Ron Barnes and Annie Harris were not convinced that the stairway is in the right location, and that the area allowed for the stairway is too tight. He would rather see an open stairway. Mr. Collins rued that he is not in favor of open stairways. It was reconvended by the DRB that they change the location of the stairway and that this matter be restudied. It was also recommended that they restudy the entrance. Brandy's was allowed to proceed with the work on the far end of the deck and that • they come back with revisions for the stair-ay and the entrance for the next meeting. Mr. McMullen, owner of Brandy's noted that time is of the essence and that he must start construction as soon as possible or it will be too late. MINUIES OF THE DRB MEETING OCT. 24, 1979 Page 2 The Board agreed, since Brandy's has had to make numerous presentations to the Board, that the revised drawings would be reviewed by the DRB members as soon as they have been revised and submitted. ************ T.H.E. Restaurant A drawing was presented showing the proposed doors, location and design, as requested at the last meeting. The color sanple for the sign was not available for this meeting. It should be available soon and as soon as it arrives the Board will review it on an individual basis. DRB ACTION: Approved the doors Color sample will be reviewed SRA ACTION: • STERN-TISE - preliminary plans for A & P site Steve Tise and Jeff Stern presented preliminary plans for the condominiums for the Washington St./Federal Street site. It was decided to change the design concept for this project. They will keep the same height and roof pitch as that of the original condominium buildings. It is proposed to build tH%°bedroom flats on the first level and duplexes on the upper levels. Front entry e will be from Federal Street and the rear entrance at the existing parking area. The DRB approved the design concept and that Stern-Tise proceed with work drawings. Steve Tise noted that they are still looking at costs and most likely some items will become optionals. DRB ACTION: Approved the design concept as submitted. SRA ACTION: NIINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD OCT. 24, 1979 Page 3 15 Crombie Street A color sample for the paint for the house (soft brown) was submitted by Allison Crump. The DRB recommended they use the brown tone in a lighter value. A sample will be done on the building itself before proceeding with the entire job. The DRB will have the opportunity to inspect the sample paint on the building. PICKERING WHARF - Tucker Shields Tucker Shields of Add Inc. noted that a few things have not been approved on the Pickering Wharf project. Regina's - Add Inc. approved a green and whits awning on the entire building where Regina's is located. Now the Cheese Cake Company is going into the same building and they would like to have an awning with their colors (blue and white) over its location. Add Inc. feels it would not be appropriate to have two different awnings on one building. A neon sign (vertical lettering) was proposed for Regina's. Add Inc. does not • approve of vertical signs and presented alternatives to the vertical sign. Regina's did not respond to Add Inc. 's suggestions. DRB ACTION: Did not approve the vertical sign - resubmittal is requested, including lettering. Did not approve the two different awnings for one building - requests alternate solution from Add Inc. BUILDING "B" A portion of the building was leased to a toy shop which does not have street frontage. They would like to add a small room on the side of the building to be used for display purposes. DRB ACTION: Disapproved the addition and noted it does not see any solution to this problem and would hope that they would use a sign instead of a display. Respectfully submitted, Ethel C. Crowell • Salem Redevelopment 44-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744-4580 MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD OCTOBER 10, 1979 The nenbers of the Design Review Board net at One Salem Green, Salem, Mass. on Wednesday, October 10, 1979 with the following nenbers present: Robert Scagliotti, Helen Baldwin, Ronald Barnes, Michael McDougall, John Collins and John Wright. The Board reviewed the following proposals: Stern-rise - preliminary presentation for the Federal/Washington St. site. The Board reviewed the plan submitted and requested a resubmission at the next special meeting. DRB ACTION: No action taken - resubmission requested. Magus - Essex St. / The Board reviewed the request for approval on the shingles for the building. DRB ACTION: Approved black fiberglass shingles SRA ACTION: APPROVED ************* Russian Club - Derby St. The Board approved painting the existing rear windows the same color used on the front of the building. Arco Station - Derby St. The DRB approved cleaning the brick work and recomlended an old "AMDOD" sign be refurbished and installed. ************ • • MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING- OCT. 10, 1979 Page 2 15 Crombie St. - paint color The Board was advised that the owners of the building would like to paint the house. The Board approved the concept of painting the house its original color. Color sample will be reviewed by each individual Board member for approval. DRB ACTION: Approved concept of painting SRA ACTION: No action taken T.H.E. Restaurant - East India Square A sketch of the sign for the restaurant was submitted. The Board approved the sign subject to receipt of a detailed, colored drawing of the sign; method of attachment, revised elevation and drawing of the door with circle.to scale, for submission at the special meeting on the 24th. Firehouse - sign - Lafayette St. and Derby St. location No action taken. Request submission of a color photograph of the sign on the building. The two side panels with fluorescent bulbs must be removed and portion underneath patched and painted. Respectfully submitted, C. G. Olney { Joshua Ward House • The SRA approved the change in the plan for the concrete cap e •MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD OCT. 10, 1979 Page 3 Pickering Wharf - Discussion Present for the discussion - R. Scagliotti, H. Baldwin, J. Wright, R. Barnes, M. McDougall, Dan Mansur, Mike Moniz, Jeff Shaw, Tim Smith, Phil Briggs and Tucker Shields. The DRB net with individuals involved with Pickering Wharf to discuss problems in the design review process, resolve discrepancies between approved drawings and actual construction that has occurred, and to clarify design review procedures for Pickering Wharf in its final construction phases. Concern was expressed by the Board members that construction is taking place at Pickering Wharf without prior approval of the DRB. The Board was also concerned with the fact that even when plans are approved by the DRB, actual construction does not necessarily follow the guidelines of the approved plans. Phil Briggs commumanted that communication between Wilder Manly Management Co. , Add Inc., the DRB and Heritage Trust is lacking and that Add Inc. is not reviewing all of the renovation plans, and that Add Inc. has often been in the position of presenting plans to the DRB after the construction is completed. • Jeff Shaw remarked that Wilder Manly is trying to get tenants moved into Pickering Wharf and that in some of the cases design changes taking place in the field without DRB approval were necessitated due to time schedules. The Board remarked that the leasing agents must know in advance that these changes are going to take place and that there is no excuse for not presenting the design plans to the DRB before construction. Jeff Shaw agreed that this situation should not occur and that in the future the DRB will receive all plans prior to construction. The Board stated that they would hold special meetings, if necessary, but that the DRB does meet once a month, and the management company should have no reason for proceeding with construction without DRB approval. The DRB stated that according to the contract with the city, Pickering Wharf architect is supposed to review and present all plans to the Board. The Board stated that over the last few months, plans have been presented by wilder Manly and by individual tenants and that ADD Inc. does not appear to have even reviewed .the plans or design changes. Phil Briggs stated that ADD Inc. has not reviewed all of the plans and in some cases has disagreed with the proposed changes. Phil expressed concern with the density of the project and stated that the overall design intent of the project should be strictly adhered to. MINUTES OF THE DRB MMTING OCT. 10, 1979 Page 4 • Bob Scagliotti inquired as to what would happen in the event that the DRB would disapprove any plans for Pickering Wharf. Mike Moniz said that the Planning Dept. , in the Pickering Wharf situation, assumes the role of the SPA. In the case of design review within the urban renewal areas, if the DRB disapproves something, the DRB sends its recommendation to the SRA for a final determination. ADD. Inc., Wilder Manly and Heritage Trust II stated that in the future all plans for Pickering Wharf will be presented to the Board prior to construction and that ADD Inc. will review all plans even if they are not the designers. All plans for Pickering Wharf, whether submitted by ADD Inc. , Wilder Manly or any other party, will be reviewed by ADD Inc. , and ADD Inc. 's comments will accompany all submissions to the DRB. Other areas of discussion: Signs: The DRB expressed concern that the sign booklet prepared by ADD Inc. and approved by the Board has not been strictly adhered to. ("Jade Tree" sign for example) The Planning Dept. administers sign permits and Mike Moniz stated that he would look into the situation. Jeff Shaw stated that this should not present major problems. Helen Baldwin stated that attention to detail makes the ultimate difference in the final outcome of the project. and: Solution to discrepancies between approved plans and actual construction Mike Moniz will work with ADD Inc. , Tim Smith, and Wilder Manly, to develop a punch list and a time schedule for conpletion. Respectfully submitted, Michael Mcniz re Salem Redevelopment Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744 -4580 MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD SEPTEMBER 26, 1979 The members of the DRB met at One Salem Green, Salem, Mass. on Wednesday Sept. 26, 1979 for a special meeting with the following manbers present: Robert Scagliotti, Ronald Barnes, John Collins. The Board reviewed the following items: 298-302 Essex St. - Mr. Jack Levin Mr. Levin attended the meeting to discuss the deficiencies and changes in the work at 298-302 Essex St. The DRB Chairman advised Mr. Levin that the DRB should have been notified prior to making any changes in the work. • Mr. Levin's architect, David Jaquith, noted that some of the changes were made due to field conditions and determinations were made immediately. Ronald Barnes stated the Board had requested detailed drawings for the cutting of the beam and/or rebricking around the beam behind the sign board. Drawings were never received and Mr. Levin proceeded to cover the beam with the sign board without approval. Mr. Levin advised the Board that the mason started to do the work and found that there were no brick ties and it appeared that this was becoming a huge and expensive job. He felt, financially, he could not afford to do the brick work the way the Board would like to see it done. The Board discussed the possibility of repainting the signboard to blend in with the building. The present color seems to cut the building in half. The Board, after further discussion, could not go along with the sign board and noted that Mr. Levin has tried to do an excellent job on the building and it would be a disaster if he c&qraiot coirplete the building the way it should be done because of lack of funds. It was also noted that if the work is delayed it will probably cost twice as much to do it at a later date. It was recommended by the DRB that the SRA be approached to consider awarding Mr. Jack Levin additional financial assistance so that he may proceed with the removal of the steel flanges and complete the brick work. MINUMS OF THE DRB MEETING HELD SEPT. 26, 1979 Page 2 • Mr. Levin agreed to hire a new mason to do the brick work, as required by the DRB, should financial assistance become available through the Redevelopment Authority, as well as correcting the following items: 1. Correct the downspouts - remove aluminun and replace with galvanized or steel pipe (rectilineal or square shape) painted, as reconvended by the architect, and properly secured to the building and lined up straight. 2. Replace the brick sills under the windows with wooden sills as originally approved. 3. Snow fence will be installed as originally approved. 4. Submit a detailed drawing for replacing the sign board with brick. 5. Submit a detailed drawing for the "300 Essex Street" sign showing location,etc. DRB ACTION: Resubmission requested SRA ACTION: • Brandy's (Pickering Wharf) Thomas McMullen Mr. McMullen advised the Board that Add Inc. did not want to appear before the Board with a presentation for the addition of a deck to the existing structure and enclosing the first level. Add Inc. was not in favor of the addition. The owners of Pickering Wharf feel that it is a good idea. The deck would be waterproof and allow for drainage. It would seat about 60 people. Drawings were presented to the DRB but the DRB felt that they would have to have detailed drawings in order to relate to the entire project. It was recommnded that the architect attend the next presentation meeting. Mr. McMullen agreed to submit: drawings for the plant boxes as they relate to the existing structure; detail of the stairway and the enclosure for the stairway; side elevations (west & east) ; perspective of the southwest corner; and will check with the Building Inspector's office on the legality of the overhang over a public way. DRB ACTION: Resubmission requested • Respectfully submitted, Ethel C. Crowell Salem MM Redevelopment 44-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744 4580 MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 12, 1979 The members of the Design Review Board met at One Salem Green with the fol- lowing members present: Robert Scagliotti, Helen Baldwin, Ronald Barnes, Annie Harris and Michael McDougall. The Board discussed the matter of the sign and menu box at the Pewter Pot restaurant on Essex St. Since no response has been received from the previous communication, the Board requested that the SRA's attorney write a letter to the owners of the Pewter Pot requesting a formal presentation. The Board discussed the sign for As You Like It restaurant. The SRA's Project Administrator advised the Board that negotiations are going on with the owners of the building and that the matter will be taken care of during the negotiations. • It was requested that a letter be sent to Compress Press relative to the new sign that they installed on the Masonic Building, requesting a formal presentation to the DRB. The members of the Board inspected the work being done by Mr. Jack Levin at 298-302 Essex Street since there are a number of deficiencies to be corrected and it has been revealed that there is some work going on that is not in accordance with the approved drawings. Market Stall Enclosure = Conrad Baldini Mr. Baldini advised the Board that he would like to enclose eight of the market stalls (New Derby Street end of the Market Area) for year round use as an eatery and pub. Mr. Baldini made a preliminary presentation. He noted that this was his first attempt and did not expect immediate approval. Mr. Baldini was advised that the Board would require detailed drawings as to construction, material, elevations, etc. He was requested to hire an architect to prepare the drawings in order to save him time and the Board would be willing to meet again, special meeting if necessary, to get things going for him. DRB: No action necessary • MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD SEPT. 12, 1979 Page 2 • Party Line - Washington St. - Mr. Bill Graffum & Dan Tremblay Signs Mr. Graffum was asked to come to the DRB meeting since he had signs placed on his store windows that do not conform to the sign regulations in the sign manual, and is inappropriate to the area. Mr. Graffum stated that he does not feel that the sign is inoffensive and it is conducive to his business. He stated that he cannot afford to replace the sign at this time The Superintendent for the Masonic Building noted that the Building Inspector's office advised him that he did not need a permit to replace a sign. After discussion is was found to be that the installation of the new sign was a total misunderstanding between the Superintendent and the Building Inspector's office. Mr. Graffum advised the Board that he is negotiating with Hallmark and if everything goes through, and he takes on the Hallmark line, then there is a possibility of changing the sign. It was agreed that the Board will wait three months, which is the time needed • to complete the negotiations with Hallmark. At the end of the three months the matter will be reviewed by the DRB. DRB ACTION: Approved the temporary sign for three months SRA ACTION: No action necessary PICKERING WHARF - Add Inc. - Tucker Shields The Board was advised that Pickering Wharf has made changes as follows: Building C. - Door #14 The entrance door had to be recessed since by law they are not allowed to have a door swing out onto the sidewalk. Building E - window They changed the proposed greenhouse on the south elevation back to a window section. Building L - west facade, Victoria Station • In order to maintain a cleaning area out of public view they would like to add a 10' x 14' section to the compactor room on the west elevation to match the existing construction. MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD SEPT. 12, 1979 Page 3 • Building C - skylights The Board approved the skylight windows as submitted. The Board discussed the manner in which all of these changes are being made prior to DRB approval. They are expecially concerned with the tower treatment and the changes that were made which are not in accordance with the approved drawings. DRB ACTION: Approved the changes with the following conditions: The Board noted that the Planning Dept. should be so advised of the condition. The Board approved the four Pickering Wharf changes noted above subject to the corrections on the tower, as drawn and submitted by the Architect and approved by the DRB, and, will not allow these changes to take place unless the tower construc- tion is corrected, and; The DRB requests an answer from Mike Moniz of the Salem Planning Dept., through the Salem Five Cents Savings Bank, as to what they intend to do about this and, if necessary, the DRB will refer the matter to the City Solicitor and ask for a ruling, and; • The DRB insists an enclosure be constructed around the air conditioning units that stand out in public view. At this time a copy of Add Inc. 's letter to the Salem Five Cents Savings Bank was read relative to an addition to the deck on Building "A". Add Inc. stated that they are opposed to any "porch-like" structure. The DRB agreed with Add Inc. 's position on the proposed porch like addition and noted that the DRB would not approve such a proposal. Metcom - Eric Rumpf Mr. Rumpf presented revised drawings in accordance with recommendations made at the last DRB meeting, (revised drawings dated Sept. 12, 1979) . Elevations for the south side (Dodge St.) were presented showing the windows being opened up, as recommended, where the elevator shaft is located. The glass will be tinted bronze. It was recommended that the doorway shown be centered. The door will be for a second means of egrees, steel with glass panels above. The DRB advised Mr. Rumpf that the mortar and bricks are to match the existing brick work. • • MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING SEPT. 12, 1979 Page 4 The Lafayette Street elevations showed new concrete sills poured in place which will match the other sections t ns in the building. Th e developer plans to use bronze anodized panels and tinted glass. The East elevation was approved as submitted. It was recommended that the top of the windows be no more than 6" from the spring line of the arch. The North elevation showed clear glass on the first floor and tinted glass above. The doorway was shown as recessed due to the grade problem. The DRB would want to see a detailed drawing for the door before installation. North elevation approved. The office entry on the west side was discussed and the Board recommended that this be restudied and consideration be given to using a glass box (greenhouse type entrance) , one story high. Respectfully submitted, Ethel C. Crowell • • ' FILE COPY 1166 IJi,rsacl iu�etts Avenue Cambridge Massachusetts 02138 • ADD Inc Architecture Design Development 617 661 0165 Philip M Briggs Wilson F Pollock Jr 30 August 1979 Mr. Thomas Leonard Salem Five Cent Savings Bank 210 Essex Street Salem, MA. 01970 Re: Addition to Deck of Building A Pickering Wharf Dear Tom: This office has been and will continue to be agreeable to investigating ways of altering the buildings at Pickering Wharf. In fact, the buildings were designed such that they lend themselves to various alterations . As you know, we often have worked with you and the project • owners to achieve additional rentable/saleable square footage, several times at the expense of what we felt was a more acceptable design solution. We also have worked with a few of the larger tenants on the project to provide additional mechanical space where required. However, we do not condone adding purely superfluous exten- sions to the buildings. The site was designed such that it is extremely close to the maximum allowable building coverage and adding structures to the same might constitute an illegal- ity. Also major additions to the buildings most definitely will affect the character of the site. We, therefore, are opposed to the addition of any "porch-like" structure to the deck of the Building A pub and any other such major addition to any building at Pickering Wharf. We would be pleased to meet with you at your convenience to d uss these and other design. changes. Vr tr y ours, Philip �iggs PMB:mays cc : Tim Smith Bob Gallivan Salem Redevelopment 44-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744.4580 MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD AUGUST 22, 1979 The members of the Design Review Board met for a special meeting. Ronald Barnes and Helen Baldwin were present. The following proposals were reviewed: Pickering Wharf - Victoria Station, new mechanical room The architect advised the Board that they are having a serious problem with the air-conditioning in one particular section of the building which is located at the end of the duct line. The system is not able to take care of this section of the building. The only solution'.is to install an individual system and build a mechanical room. They will have to close off an existing doorway, and create an emergency egress. The mechanical room will be painted to match the existing building and the flue pipe for the system will be copper to match the roof. • DRB ACTION: Approved Metcom - Eric Rumpf Mr. Rumpf attended the meeting to present preliminary plans showing the pro- posed rehabilitation of the building located at the corner of New Derby and Lafayette St. It is proposed to remove the one story building facing the First National Store. The owner of the adjoining pr6perty, is requiring the developer to install a fence between the properties. It was considered to create an arcade through the building but there is a problem of elevation and_ t-does not seem feasible. The proposed use for the upper floors would be office space only. Windows will have a center mullion 7' 6" square, bronze anodize aluminum transoms, thermopane glass as opposed to the original industrial type windows. The top course will be painted to match the lighter concrete. The largest problem is the Lafayette Street section. It seems to be that the arches cannot support the weight. The whole Lafayette St. side will have to be • restudied in order to blend in with the New Derby St. side of the building. The panel and window treatment'-did not receive DRB approval and recommended that the developer restudy this section and consider using brick rather than bronze panels between the windows. The DRB felt that this is a very imp6rtant section of the building. � 4 1 MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD AUG. 22, 1979 Page 3 • The Board also discussed the south facade (Dodge St) and recommended that the window;treatment be restudied to include additional windows. It was recommended that the developer reconsider the proposed treatment for the building and submit revised drawings at another regular DRB meeting in order to get input from the entire Board. Russian Club The DRB previously approved a new awning for the building. The owners would like to retain the metal awning and paint it. The DRB felt that it should stay with its original approval for a new awning and would approve any bright color. DRB ACTION: Disapproved the metal awning • Respectfully submitted, Ethel C. Crowell I Salem Redevelopment TELEPHONE 744-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 744-4580 MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD AUGUST 8, 1979 The-members of the Design Review Board met at One Salem Green, August 8, 1979, with the following members present: Ronald Barnes, John Wright, Helen Baldwin and Annie Harris. The Board reviewed the following proposals: 298-302 Essex St. - Jack Levin Mr. Levin and his sign designer, Mr. Portelance, attended the meeting requesting approval for the signs at 298-302 Essex St. in the Heritage Plaza-West urban renewal area. Mr. Levin noted that he felt the signs should be located above the concrete lintel. The original sign board is high off the street. Two signs for new tenants for the first level were reviewed. "Dance Class" - 10 ft. x 17 in. sign fabricated of 2 inch; Redwood, painted cream and blue (the DRB recommended a lighter shade of blue than that shown on the sample) . The sign will be fastened to the building. Lettering will be Broadway type letters (sample submitted) . "its a CREWEL WORLD" - 10 ft. x 17 in. sign fabricated in 2 inch Redwood, painted a light olive background. Lower case letters are to be Helvetica and CREWEL WORLD in 8z inch Fleurdon letters. Other colors are to be Red, Yellow and Medium Green. The sign will be fastened to the building with galvanized angle shoes and lag screws. Mr. Levin requestedzapproval on the following signs: 300 ESSEX STREET - 2 inch Redwood, 17 inches by 60 inches painted Levin Green with gold leaf letters, Bodini type lettering and numerals. Sign will be attached to the building. 298 ESSEX STREET - 2 inch Redwood, 20 inches by 36 inches painted Levin Green with gold leaf letters, 5 inch Bodini letters and numerals. Mr. Levin would also like to have a directory painted white background with 2 inch hand lettered "Kabel' type lettering to identify the upstairs tenants. The directory would be located between the door and window at 298 Essex Street. The sign would be pinned to the building with galvanized angle shoes and lag screws. The color scheme for the directory was discussed in detail. MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD AUG. 8, 1979 Page 2 • Mr. Levin noted that it would be too costly to burn off the steel flange and would like to install a brick relief course as an alternate treatment. The DRB agreed to take a field trip to look at the situation. Note: Helen Baldwin inspected the building and had no objection. Ronald Barnes and Robert Scagliotti felt that they would like to see the flange burned off. If necessary Mr. Levin could find another man to do the work who would have a better torch to do the work faster and then he could install the brick work flush. If it is impossible to burn the flange off for structural reasons, they would like to see a detailed drawing as to how this work would be accomplished and how the projection will be. • Minutes of the DRB meeting held Aug. 8, 1979 Page 2 Mr. Levin noted that it would be too costly to burn off the steel flange and would like to install a brick relief course as an alternative treatment. The DRB agreed to take a field trip to look at the situation. Note: Helen Baldwin. nspected the building and had no_ objection. Ronald Barnes and Robert Scagliotti felt that Nh . Levin should provide a good reason as to why he cannot ' burn off the steel and if no_reason canbe provided,a detailed drawing of what he - - - - - intends to do is to be submitted DRB ACTION: Dance- Class sign approved with the recommended lighter blue color; its a CREWEL WORLD approved; 298 and 300 ESSEX STREET signs - approved 298 Director sign approved with green background and gold letters and the identifying plaques are to be white background with green letters. SRA ACTION: Signs approved Bavarian Deli-Haus outdoor dining sign - One Salem Green Mr. Dana Smith advised the Board that he has changed the table arrangement as requested by the Board. He has had a sign made up which is a copy of the hanging sign which is to be located at the entrance to the outdoor dining area. Mr. Smith also noted that next year he will replace the existing umbrellas with 'new umbrellas. DRB ACTION: Outdoor dining sign approved SRA ACTION: Approved Architects PresentationsforHeritage -Plaza-West -facades Chia Ming Sze presented preliminary plans for the Kerr building. Mr. Sze noted that he is not here to request approval of the plans. This meeting is merely to get com- ments from the DRB on possible treatment. Mr. Sze felt that the best way to use the available funds would be to do something about the first level and how the three sections of the building could relate to one another. • MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD AUG. 8, 1979 Page 3 Mr. Harris has a serious problem with windows and air conditioning on the first and second levels. He would like to redo the face of the facia and try to get Mr. Harris to install a better awning and get rid of the paint on the main building. The old Foodland building could be changed in scale by painting the brick. The owner did not care for this treatment. The brickwork could be washed down and put on a facia. This building, Foodland building, is the more difficult building to deal with. The real problem is that he is having a difficult time renting the first floor. Mr. Sze suggested putting in an arcade-through the building to the parking lot. Y.M.C.A. Building - Mr. Sze noted that some of the Board members felt that building is too large for their operation and the existing energy problem and the work that has been done in the building over the years has ruined it entirely. We are now trying to work with the present Director to save the building and keep the "Y" in Salem. It was proposed to use the two upper floors for housing and operate the Y' from the first floor and the basement area. There is a large vacant space in the basement that could be better utilized by the "Y". Staley MCDermet - Frye Building Staley MCDermet noted that he was able to research the building back to 1825. It was proposed to take off the skim coat and clean up the brick work and recommended the restoration of the chimney line along the Barton Square elevation. On the first floor, leave the sign board and take the brick off and cover it up with wood back to street level. Bowman Building The second and third floors are in good shape. The third floor is vacant, the second floor is partially used The parking lot side is a big question since it is proposed as a site for development. The DRB felt that the proposed first floor treatment does not go with the rest of the building. It was recommended that=the architectural lines at each end of the building be brought down to the street level The first floor treatment is to be restudied. Ann Beha —Peabody Block The Board was advised that this has become a five building project which includes a vacant lot. All the buildings have historic facades and should be treated that way. There should be commercial use on the first floor with residential use (apartments) • for the upper floors and apartments in the loft area. The original entrance would be restored. r MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD AUG. 8, 1979 Page 4 • It was proposed to restore the first level and take the middle building and recess it between the other buildings and put anew face on it. (Copy of preliminary write-up enclosed) Pickering Wharf - Tucker Shields Mr. Shields was advised by the DRB that it does not approve of the fenestration of the tower. The existing construction is not the same as what was approved by the Design Review Board at an earlier meeting. g The DRB is asking for a resubmittal for the tower construction so that they may be able to work together to come to a satisfactory design solution. Andrew Innes, Planning Dept. Staff Architect, will bring the matter up for dis- cussion with the City Planner. A proposal for Building "D" (change in the dormer) east elevation, was presented for approval. Pickering Wharf is required to add a stairway as a second means of egress for the • new tenant in the building. DRB ACTION: Approved Respectfully submitted, Ethel C. Crowell ANN ftHA A555,0GIA .5 57 W4M �., 1�21oh1 August 8 , 1979 PEABODY BLOCK FEASIBILITY STUDY SUMMARY Property: • Peabody Building, Washington Street and Barton Square built in 1892 as a three-story building, 4th floor added c. 1912. • Post Office Building, Washington Street built in 1882 . Peabody Building built to match Post Office Building. • Salem Gas and Light Company Building , Essex Street built in 1913. • Mill Building, Barton Square built in late 19th century. • One-story Building, Barton Square built in early 20th century. Current Owner: Mansfield Trust Proposed Use Commercial on ground floor, housing on upper floors . Proposed Preservation Strategy: • General strategy is to reconstruct historic facades of Peabody Post Office and Gas and Light Buildings and creatively re- habilitate the facades of the Mill and Infill Buildings . Reconstruct: Wood frame shop fronts of Peabody Building, first floor facades of Post Office and Gas and Light Building. Repair: Upper floors of street facades of Peabody, Post Office , Gas and Light and Mill Building. Redevelop : Balconies, larger windows can be added to facades not facing a street of Peabody, Post Office, Gas and Light Building and Mill Building; first floor street facade of Mill Building should receive a modern storefront which would comple- ment the extant features ; Barton Square one-story Building could be considered for demolition for necessary parking with its facade retained as an entryway; a modern facade should be added to the Infill Building between the Peabody and Post Office Buildings , and recessed to diminish its presence on the historic streetscape. JA • MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD WED. JULY 11 , 1979 The members of the Design Review Board held its meeting on Wednesday, July 11 , 1979 with the following members present: Robert Scagliotti , John Collins , John Wright, Annie Harris, Ron Barnes , and Helen Baldwin. The following proposals were reviewed: Asia House The owner asked to be allowed to hang four banners , each consisting of two colors along the front of his shop to attract attention and add color to the area. He has an acute problem of lack of visibility. DRB ACTION: Approved as presented SRA ACTION: Approved John Collins John presented two schematic drawings (A & B) of proposed landscaping for Parcel # RC 13A. (Salem News lot on Front St. ) The plans were for a temporary development of the lot in orderv* for it to be more compatible with the neighborhood. • DRB ACTION: Approved schematic A which included some kind of "transparent" fence set back about three quarters of the way from the front edge and including a diagonal walkway. SRA ACPION: Howl=agreed to_wa t':_ uitil-the_plan :is received from John Collins Pickering Wharf - Add Inc. Tucker presented miscellaneous changes, some having already been accomplished. Ageneral discussion ensued concerning the Board' s displeasure with the look of the tower which originally was supposed to be a focal point of the project. It was noted that the windows are too small . At this time, the DRB requested a meeting with Dave Lash in reference to the DRB' s lack of control within the project . DRB ACTION: None Witch Museum - Lvnde St. Robert Curran Mr. Curran presented a plan for two signs to be applied to the front of the building, one indicating the name and the other indicating the entrance. His presentation was incomplete and the Board requested that he return with an elevation drawing indicating position of signs in scale and method of attachment and a drawing of the signs in scale and a sample of the sign maker' s work. • Chris Olney • Chris spoke to the Board in reference to design review of Heritage Plaza West and the existing overlap of responsibilities between the Salem Historic District Commission and the DRB. A meeting between the two groups was requested so that it can be worked out. SRA ACTION: b4aeting scheduled with Historic Salem and URB Social Security A represenative from the Social Security Office presented a du- plicate full size decal of the sign that has already been applied (in non-conformance with the SRA. sign code and without SRA permission) to the second story window of the Mondev building overlooking the Essex St . Mall . He expressed his intention of leaving it there since he is complying with Federal Regulations . During a field trip the Board members noted that the existing sign is not centered on the window and would be in better scale if it were smaller. It would seem to the Board that even though this tenant must comply with Federal Regulations that it also could have given some consideration to the wishes of the local agencies and a fair compromise could have been arranged. The Board also requests that the black and white temporary sign currently leaning in the window, be removed. SRA ACTION: Letter to be sent to Social Security office Pewter Pot • A. represenatative for the Pewter Pot presented a drawing of a menu board which has already been applied to the exterior of the building to the right of the main entrance. The Board took a field trip and the following requests were made. 1 . The menu board is much to large and should be reduced to allow at least one or two inches of the brick to show on either side of it . 2 . Paint the box the same blue as the three small�,,signs also on the front of the building. 3. The DRB requests that the large projecting plastic sign be removed to reduce the visual clutter in the area. 5tern RA ACTT Letter to be sent to Pewter Pot manager Stern Changes in the original landscape plan were presented. 1 . Wooden fence in place of brick wall as garden enclosures. Proposed fence - Reliable, 6 ' , cedar stained to match wood on buildings . 2 . Board recommends substituting lilac or privet as yard dividers instead of arborvitae 3. John Collins recommended grass in front of fences in place of ground cover since fence has been set back and perhaps the extra money could be used for additional trees . DRB ACTION - Approved with noted recommendations. SRA ACTION: Board agreed to wait until a plan is submitted • Respectfully submitted, Haen Baldwin • MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING`9ELD WED. JULY 11 , 1979 The members of the Design Review Board held its meeting on Wednesday, July 11 , 1979 with the following members present: Robert Scagliotti, John Collins, John Wright, Annie Harris, Ron Barnes , and Helen Baldwin. The following proposals were reviewed: Asia House The owner asked to be allowed to hang four banners, each consisting of two colors along the front of his shop to attract attention and add color to the area. He has an acute problem of lack of visibility. DRB ACTION: Approved as presented SRA ACTION: Approved John Collins John presented two schematic drawings (A & B) of proposed landscaping for Parcel # RC 13A (Salem News lot on Front St. ) The plans were for a temporary development of the lot in order_ for it to be more compatible with the neighborhood. • DRB ACTION: Approved schematic A which included some kind of "transparent" fence set back about three quarters of the way from the front edge and including a diagonal walkway. SRA ACPION: Board.agreed -tdwait-until the plan is received_from John Collins Pickering Wharf - Add Inc. Tucker presented miscellaneous changes , some having already been accomplished. Ageneral discussion ensued concerning the Board' s displeasure with the look of the tower which originally was supposed to be a focal point of the project. It was noted that the windows are too small . At this time, the DRB requested a meeting with Dave Lash in reference to the DRB' s lack of control within the: project. DRB ACTION: None Witch Museum - Lvnde St. Robert Curran Mr. Curran presented a plan for two signs to be applied to the front of the building, one indicating the name and the other indicating the entrance. His presentation was incomplete and the Board requested that he return with an elevation drawing indicating position of signs in scale and method of attachment and a drawing of the signs in scale and a sample of the sign maker' s work . • Chris Olney Chris spoke to: the Board in reference to design review of Heritage Plaza West and the existing overlap of responsibilities between the Salem Historic District Commission and the DRB. • A meeting between the two groups was request-ed so that it can be worked out. sRA ACTION: Meeting scheduled with Historic Salem and DRB Social Security . A represenative from the Social Security Office presented a du- plicate full size decal of the sign that has already been applied (in non-conformance with the SRA sign code and without SRA permission) to the second story window of the Mondev building overlooking the Essex St . Mall . He expressed his intention of leaving it there since he is complying with Federal Regulations . During a field trip the Board members noted that the existing sign is not centered on the window and would be in better scale if it were smaller. It would seem to the Board that even though this tenant must comply with Federal Regulations that it also could have given some consideration to the wishes of the local agencies and a fair compromise could have been arranged. The Board also requests that the black and white temporary sign currently leaning in the window, be removed. SRA ACTION: Letter to be sent to Social Security office Pewter Pot A represenatative for the Pewter Pot presented a drawing of a menu board which has already been applied to the exterior of the building to the right of the main entrance. The Board took • a field trip and the following requests were made. _1 . The menu board is much to large and should be reduced to allow at least one or two inches of the brick to show on either side of it. 2. Paint the box the same blue as the three small signs also on the front of the building. 3. The DRB requests that the large projecting plastic sign be removed to reduce the visual clutter in the area. RA ACTON: Letter to be sent to Pewter Pot manager tern i.se Changes in the original landscape plan were presented. 1 . Wooden fence in place of brick wall as garden enclosures. Proposed fence Reliable, 6' , cedar stained to match wood on buildings . 2. Board recommends substituting lilac or privet as yard dividers instead of arborvitae 3. John Collins recommended grass in front of fences in place of ground cover since fence has been set back and perhaps the extra money could be used for additional trees. DRB ACTION - Approved with noted recommendations. SRA ACTION: Board agreed to wait until a plan is submitted • Respectfully submitted, Haien Baldwin SalemME Redevelopment 4-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744-4580 MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD JUNE 13, 1979 The members of the DRB met at One Salem Green, Salem, Mass. on Wednesday, June 13, 1979 with the following members present: Robert Scagliotti, Ronald Barnes, Annie Harris, John Wright and Helen Baldwin. It was noted by the Chairman that Norbert Florendo has communicated by telephone with the Chairman and the SRA'a Project Administrator that it is necessary that he resign as a member of the Design Review Board. His new position does not leave him time to attend any Design Review Board meetings. The Board reviewed the following proposals: Salem Laundry - Robert Scagliotti (R. Scagliotti did not vote on this matter) Revised drawings were presented for the New Derby St. , Central St. and Lafayette Street sections of the building. The only major change is the redesign of the store on the corner of Central St. and New Derby St. • DRB ACTION: Approved as submitted SRA ACTION: xxxxxxxxxxxxxx The DRB was advised that the SRA is installing flag pole sleeves in the Heritage Plaza-East area. The sleeves were taken out of the Washington St. Island when the public .improvement work was being done by DeIulis Bros. xxxxxxxxxxxxx Central St. Landscaping Plan for Parcel RC-11B The DRB reviewed the revised landscaping plan submitted by John Collins for the project development on the Central St. parcel. The compactor has been made smaller and will be installed underground. A hydrolic lift will be installed for pick-up. The SRA will do site improvement work on Central St. and Holyoke Court. The walkway ,has been strengthened along the back of the Ingemi Building. The SRA will trade the cost of land for the developer doing the site improvement work. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Market Stalls • The Board discussed the problems involved in trying to approve enclosures for the MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD JUNE 13, 1979 Page 2 market stalls and voted that it will not approve any presentation for the market stalls unless they choose one of the four plans for enclosures prepared by John Collins. The Board respectfully requests that the City be asked to complete a design selection for the market stall enclosures, under the contract with John Collins. The Board discussed the possible use of the vacant parcel on the corner of Lafayette St. and Front St. as a temporary parking area. It was requested by the Project Administrator that the Board consider some type of screening to block off the parking area from public view. The owner of the Bavarian Deli attended the meeting at the SRA's request to discuss the outdoor furniture placed on property owned by Salem Corporation. Mr. Smith advised the Board that he was not aware of the fact that he had to come before the. Design Review Board. He was following the terms of the lease, which provides for the use of the property owned by Salem Corp. It was decided • to try out the operation over the Memorial Day weekend and the selection of the furniture was made in a hurry and theyodid'not have much to choose from. Every- thing that is custom made required a 6/8 weeks delivery time. The Board approved the outdoor furniture and the owner noted that if other furniture is to be purchased, he will attend the DRB meeting before making any selec- tion. The barrier ribbon being used is temporary until they find something suitable. DRB ACTION: Outdoor furniture approved SRA ACTION: Respectfully submitted, Ethel C. Crowell LU M Salem Em Redevelopment 4-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 7444580 MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD WEDNESDAY, MAY 16, 1979 The Design Review Board held its meeting on Wednesday, May 16, 1979 at One Salem Green with the following members present: Helen Baldwin, Robert Scagliotti, Annie Harris, Ronald Barnes, John Wright and John Collins. Absent - Norbert Florendo. The Design Review Board reviewed the following proposals: Salem Laundry - John Hooper, Robert Scagliotti (R. Scagliotti did not vote on this presentation) The owner of the Salem Laundry building proposes to redo the first level store fronts facing New Derby Street. A major change will be installing new store fronts which will be recessed due to the fact that the building is on the property line. Mr. Hooper presented a sample of the material that he had planned to use, with • reservations, since he was told by the installer that there is no guarantee on the wear and that the material would scratch easily. (aluminum fluropon white finish) . At the time Mr. Hooper felt that the unite finish would be more appropriate. The DRB recommended that they keep it all in wood, the bulkhead could be replaced with MDO plywood. After due consideration by Mr. Hooper, he has agreed to the all wood treatment for the New Derby store fronts and one store front in the old building will have the fluropon white finish due to construction conditions. The DRB felt that the corner southeast section should be restudied in regard to design. It was agreed that drawings will be resubmitted for the New Derby St. store fronts showing wood treatment, redesign of the southeast corner. In regard to the Lafayette St. side, Mr. Hooper agreed to keep it all wood, and DRB approved the entrances. SRA Action: Approved Lafayette St. work Pasquanna Developers, Inc. - Central St. - Robert Scagliotti, (R. Scagliotti did not vote on this proposal) It was requested the Board approve a change in the size of the bedroom windows. The architect was informed by the distributors that the windows, as approved, are not available and that they would like to use 3' x 5' for the bedroom windows. • DRB=ACTION: Approved SRA ACTION: Approved MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING - MAY 16, 1979 Page 2 • HERITAGE PLAZA-WEST - John Collins John Collins presented final drawings for site improvement work in Heritage Plaza-West. He noted that it is the intent'.of'.the plan to reorganize the parking area and not to reduce the number of parking spaces. The City has informed him to delay further design work on the Washington St./Essex St. corner lot and to put the funds into fixing up Washington St. It was noted that he has eliminated vertical curbing except for a small area of sloped curbing, new pedestrian lights are to be installed along the side of the Bank building up to Lynde St. The project will be bid with three alternates: parking for the "Y"; the area next to Bowman's will be held up to see if a developer could be found; and the Kerr parking area. DRB ACTION: Approved the plan as submitted SRA ACTION: Washington St. - A landscaping plan was submitted for both sides of Washington St. which would include two areas of brick work along Washington St. (in front of City Hall and the Masonic Building) . • DRB ACTION: Approved SRA ACTION: Approved Market Stalls - Mr. Burke Mr. Burke presented a plan for two market stalls nearest Front St. Mr. Burke planned to serve food over the counter and inside. The plans submitted were in- complete and a recommendation was made by the DRB relative to the installation of the enclosure which would better serve the proposed operation. Mr. Burke felt that he did not have enough time to prepare new plans for re- submission and that the plans had already been approved by the Market Commission and the Health Dept. Mr. Burke felt that he had presented plans to enough Boards to review and withdrew his request. Pickering Wharf - David Lash, Planning Dept. The Board was advised that Pickering Wharf had an egress problem in the building closest to the National Park Service building and was required to install an exterior • stairwell by the Building Inspector's office. DRB ACTION: The DRB approved the existing installation, for the record. ti MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING, MAY 16, 1979 Page 3 • Bavarian Deli-Haus - One Salem Green - Salem Sign Co. Salem Sign Co. presented a sample typeface (German type) on 11" plywood with laminated aluminum panels. Color submission is brown and yellow tone. It was requested that the light color be used for the background with dark brown letters. The sign is to be installed in the existing frame similar to all the frames under the arcade at One Salem Green. DRB ACTION: Approved SRA ACTION: Approved Bistro LeBistingo - Front St. -Salem Sign Co. Salem Sign Co. is still trying to correct the readability problem for the "Bistro" sign when the sign is lit up at night. They believe they have found a solution by having ;4" acrylic panel painted "kidskin" and using the original ply- wood letters and install two 10. ft. fluorecent lamps behind the panel to back light the letters. • DRB ACTION: Approved SRA ACTION: Approved Robert Murphy . Bookseller - Derby Sq. - Salem Sign Salem Sign presented a proposal for a sign 12 ft. long "Robert Murphy . Bookseller" to be made with MDO Plywood, placed flush against the building. It will be blacksand background with gold leaf letters. DRB ACTION: Approved SRA ACTION: Approved Salem Jail Building - Ronald Barnes (R. Barnes did not vote on the proposal) The Board was advised that interior work is planned for the building. A new interior stairwell is to be built and it will be necessary to provide for visibility from the outside. Preliminary plans for the construction work was presented showing glass and masonry work. A sample of the concrete brick infill material was also presented for • approval. The Board felt that they would rather see granite used but they were advised that the budget would not allow for such an expense. The Board also felt that further studies should be done to find a more suitable matching material. .r . MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD MAY 16, 1979 Page 4 DRB ACTION: Approved the concept - requested resubmission of drawings and resubmission of material sample, SRA ACTION: Approved 298 Essex St. - Jack Levin - David Jaquith Mr. Levin proposed to burn off the flashing to accommodate new brick work. Mr. Levin would like to install storm windows, painted white. DRB ACTION: Approved (No action taken by the SRA Board) It was noted by the DRB that they would like to see shutters on the entire building (including the Used Furniture building) . 304 Essex St. - David Jaquith Preliminary plans were presented for future work on the Used Furniture Store . building. The owner, Mr. Winer, would like to replace all the windows due to the fact that he has a heating problem. It was recommended that the architect look into the use of "Harvey Windows" with storm and sash, similar to the windows used in Jack Levin's building. The owner would prefer a center entrance in the front and a side entrance. The Board discussed the side elevation and objected to the replacement of the existing "Allen's" sign even though it is to be replaced with a carved sign. DRB ACTION: Approved the center entrance, side door treatment, replacement of the doorway in the back and the roof shingle color is to match the roof on the adjacent building. All approvals are subject to the drawing notation that the sign is to be removed and not replaced. SRA ACTION: No action taken by the SRA Board • • MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD MAY 16, 1979 Page 5 Market Stall Enclosure - Michelle Oudin A proposal was presented to enclose a market stall to serve crepes and other foods. A plan was submitted and recommendations were made by the DRB to modify the opening for the counter space and for the installation of the hinged boards to either fold back during the day time or to be hooked up to the roof beams. The Board requested a resubmission of elevations, drawn to scale. The Board noted that if the plans are submitted before the next DRB meeting, they will come in on an individual basis to review the drawings in order to expedite matters. DRB: No action necessary Respectfully submitted Ethel C. Crowell • Salem Redevelopment 44-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744-4580 MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING - APRIL 25, 1979 The members of the Design Review Board met for a Special Meeting on Wednesday, April 25, 1979, with the following members present: Robert Scagliotti and Annie Harris. Absent: Norbert Florendo, Ronald Barnes, John Wright and Helen Baldwin. The members present reviewed the following proposals: Pickering Wharf - Building "C" • At the last DRB meeting the design change for the Tower in Building "C" was discussed. The Board asked that sketches, showing the new design, as well as alternative designs be submitted for review since the Tower Building is the main entrance to the project. The DRB was advised that since the original proposal was :submitted, it has been decided that the developer would like to have office space in the Tower. It was never intended to open it up to the public. The DRB was opposed to the horizontal band as opposed to the original sub- mission. The DRB recommended end corner boards on the building, which was sketched in by the architect. The DRB requested a copy of the design, including the corner boards, be submitted for formal approval. DRB ACTION: Approved pending receipt of a final drawing Building "A" & "L" The developer went ahead and built three dormers without submitting drawings for approval by the Design Review Board. • MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD APRIL 25, 1979 Page 2 The reason was to condominimize the apartments instead of renting them, which they felt was more economical. Salem 5C Savings Bank personnel was not aware that it had to be presented to the DRB for approval and they apologized for doing the work without approval. R. Scagliotti noted that it is a design situation and it is becoming a top heavy building and its major concern is that this is a drastic change in the design of the buildings. Reluctantly the Board approved the change in the building design for the dormers, just for the record. Mr. Leonard of the Salem 5 noted that they would like to come back to the DRB for a review on the Marine Basin design. DRB ACTION: Tower design approved - Building "C" Dormers approved - Buildings "A" & "L" Wenfield Frame - Essex Street • Sign Works of Beverly presented a sketch of a palette, projecting sign, and the wrought iron bracket as the method of attachment. The sign will be a two sided sign. The DRB requested a sketch of the sign makers signature. DRB ACTION: Approved the sign as submitted Requested a sketch of the signature (before placing the sign) SRA ACTION: The next meeting of the Design Review Board will be held Wednesday, May. 16;..1979. Respectfully submitted, Ethel C. Crowell I f T Salem hm Redevelopment JH ` °'RECTOR R JOHN N WW. BARRETT Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744-6900 MINUTES OF IIIE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD APRIL 11, 1979 The members of the Design Review Board held its meeting at One Salem Green on April 11, 1979. The following members are recorded present: John Collins, Robert Scagliotti, Ronald Barnes and Helen Baldwin. Absent: John Wright, Annie Harris, Norbert Florendo The following proposals were reviewed: Central St. building for Pasquaxina Develo ers, Inc. - Robert Sca liotti R. Scagliotti re raine rom voting Final construction drawings were presented with changes made as requested at previous DRB meetings: the arcade is to be 8 ft. wide instead of S ft. ; two stores facing the pedestrian walkway now have glazed windows; the turn at the top of the • ramp facing Holyoke Court has been eliminated. DRB ACTION: Approved SRA ACTION: No action taken - matter tabled until next meeting Heritage Plaza-West - John Collins John Collins made an initial presentation for a portion of Heritage Plaza-West. A series of analysis drawings and three alternative solutions were presented for the Board's review. The DRB members commented on the schemes presented. Bowman Parking lot - the Board suggested that by reducing the improvements to the Park, additional funds could be spent on the parking area; planting along Sewall Street could be deleted. DRB ACTION: No formal action taken • {' Page 2 v WENFIELD FRAME - Essex St. The owner presented the concept for a hanging sign which would be a palette 2 ft.. by 3 ft. The Board approved the concept and requested a final design presentation to include a picture of the building, scaled drawing of the sign and all other requirements. DRB ACTION: Approved concept - requested resubmission SRA ACTION: No action necessary Union Street Garage—David Jaquith The Board reviewed the drawings and requested a change in the cap of the building wall from concrete to copper cap. The DRB recommended lead coated copper. DRB ACTION: Approved • Joshua Ward House - Staley McDermet The DRB approved the final drawings as submitted DRB ACTION: Approved 11 SRA ACTION: Approved Pickering Wharf A presentation was made on changes already accomplished on buildings L and A. Dormers were added. All disapproved as presented. It was noted that the DRB does not like to approve something that has already been completed. Building K - Added deck, space for kitchen and stair to second level. Approved as presented. Tower - A redesign of the tower was presented. The Developer wishes to create office space in the tower and the architect has made an effort to make the tower an extension of the adjoining building. The DRB disapproved the design as presented and recommended further study and redesign to retain verticality of the tower. • In the case of buildings A and L, the DRB requires justification of the owner as to why the dormers were built without DRB approval. A special meeting will be held in two weeks (April 25) for the Bavarian Deli, Add Inc. and Wenfield Frame. Respectfully submitted, Helen Baldwin and Christopher G. Olney w Salem ExDIRECTORRedevelopment JOHN W. BARRETT Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744-6900 MINS OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING BELD WEDNESDAY, MARCfi 14, 1979 298' -320 Essex St. - Mr. Jack Levin Mr. Levin attended the DRB meeting to request a change in the design of the lintels on the second floor level. 'Ihe Board felt that it would be to Mr. Levin's advantage, for the sake of the building design, to keep the lintels the way they were approved on the plans sub- mitted previously. The Board voted to retain the lintels as originally approved. DRB ACTION: Retain the originally approved lintel design SRA ACTION: Approved • Bowditch Park - Sasaki Associates & Planning Dept. Sasaki Associates presented three preliminary plans for the proposed Bowditch Park which would be bounded by Derby St. , Congress St. , Peabody St. and Lafayette St. The Planning Dept. has authorized them to do a study for the nautical theme utilizing Grant money. They have made a complete inventory of the site and met with Boards and Commissions over the past two weeks in order to develop alternative plans. The meeting today is to get some input from the Design Review Board. In the process of developing the various schemes, the economic implications have been taken into consideration by utilizing what is already there. There is no need to disturb the wall edge since it is in good condition. A modest amount of money could be spent along the bulkhead. What they are trying to do is create a concept of a 20th Century seaport in modern day use. Parking areas were provided for in one corner away from the pedestrian activity. A museum building, which be used for displaying any articles that may be found while the dredging work is being performed. Warehouse type buildings would house retail operations. MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD MARCH 14, 1979 Page 2 • It was recommended that the parking areas be situated closer to the commercial core. The DRB was advised by the Planning Dept. that no boundaries have been set at this point. They will be looking for a design direction by the end of the month and that another meeting will be held before that time. NO ACTION NECESSARY ********** Stern-Tise - Federal St. Condominiums Samples of exterior materials were submitted for DRB approval. The following samples are approved: Bricks - Nantucket Cambridge Blend Roof Shingles - Sable Black Trim Color - Manor White Shingle - Birch Wood Stain Mortar - Natural mortar mix Paint color for the doors will be submitted at a later date. • DRB ACTION: Approved as submitted SRA ACTION: Approved ************* George Aulson - Federal St. office building Mr. Aulson advised the Board that he is required to install ventilating windows for the basement level. They are already provided for in the foundation and the galvanized frame is in place (all within the lot line) . A grill will be located in each of the window vents. DRB ACTION: Approved SRA ACTION: Approved ************ Magus Center for Performing Arts Design development plans were presented to bring the Board up to date. It is their intent to remove the glass store fronts, open up the court yard, relocate the entrace to the original building and restore the building to its original condition. • The second floor will be the administrative area, gallery and cat walk for the theatre lighting system. The Essex Institute is donating the portico which will be installed. They will pursue the idea of obtaining federal funds for a solar heating system for the building. NO ACTION NECESSARY ************* ..r MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD MARCH 14, 1979 Page 3 • Pickering Wharf - Sign manual The DRB reviewed the project sign manual. A question was raised as to why a plaque is needed for a Park/Square identification (C-1) and if it is needed, the Board would like to see a color sample and shop drawing. S-1 is to be resubmitted. All other signs are approved. In regard to the roof ventilator for Building "G", the Board advised the architect to keep the fans small. A change was noted on Building "A", where they are putting in a restaurant, a louver is to be installed. Louver design - approved New skylight design is to be submitted. Pasquanna Developers Inc. - Parcel.RC-11B - Central St. Site Robert Scagliotti refrained from voting. • The changes from the previous presentation included a new vehicle entrance from Central Street. The walkway between the rear of the Front Street building and the new proposed building will now become a total pedestrian way. Four new shops have been re-oriented to face this new pedestrian way. Additional stair locations and handicap ramps have been added to meet the ingress and egress requirements. Segmental arches, as requested at the last DRB presentation was presented and accepted. It was recommended by the DRB that the arcade facing Derby Sq. be widened; look for ways to reduce or eliminate the passageway at the stairway on the south side of the building and orient the end stores to the new pedestrian walkway. The stair way from the pedestrian walkway to the plaza level is to be studied. Study new connection between stairs and ramp adjacent to Holyoke Court. DRB ACTIN: Approved with recommendations SRA ACTION: Approved • I MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING Page 4 March 14, 1979 Heritage Plaza-West - John Collins John Collins presented three alternative plans for treatment of the parking lot (behind Bowman's) and the parcel at the corner of Washington and Essex Streets. The budget allocation is less than the cost estimate figure, therefore, there will be areas where site improvement work will have to be cut back. The parking is restricted in size but it was felt that the angle parking system would privde the most spaces. In regard to the corner parcel, John Collins noted that the option is to do something more intensive with the corner and treat the rest of the parcel very simple as an interim thing. He felt that the money should be spent up front. The other option would be to redo the facade, combined with murals. It was also noted that nothing can be decided until everyone involved is brought in to discuss their involvement, such as Lappin, the Bank, Mansfield, etc. John Collins stated that detailed drawings will be submitted in a month and that another review meeting will be held before that time. w Respectfully submitted, Ethel C. Crowell Salem Redevelopment JOHN W. B` °'RARRERET JOHN WT TT Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744-6900 MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD WEDNESDAY, FEB. 28, 1979 The Members of the Design Review Board met for a Special Meeting Wednesday, Feb. 28, 1979 at One Salem Green with the following members present: Robert Scagliotti, Helen Baldwin, Norbert Florendo, Annie Harris and John Collins. Absent: John Wright and Ronald Barnes The Board reviewed the following proposals: Pasquanna Developers, Inc. - Central St. Parcel RC-11B Robert Scagliotti presented an architectural rendering and preliminary plans for a new building to be constructed on the vacant parcel along Central St. It was noted that there has always been a twelve foot easement along the parcel • line to provide rear door access to the shops facing Front Street. The original plan called for a pedestrian mall running from Central St. to Derby Sq. (Town Hall) . The plan has since been changed and the parcel now calls for total development. The plan as presented calls for 29 parking spaces below the building. The design was proposed as U-shaped allowing for a connection to each individual building. The building was proposed for mixed use (commercial/residential) . The Board had a lengthy discussion on the treatment for the arches, deck material, and other aspects of design. The Board did agree that they would prefer to see a sketch showing segmental arches with brick columns and agreed to the; use of wood for the balcony. At this time John Collins presented schematics for treatment of the site as it relates to pedestrian and vehicular traffic. It was agreed that the proposals made by John Collins would have a direct affect on the design. R. Scagliotti noted that the proposals will have to be discussed with his client to see what changes will be made and the plans will be redesigned and resubmitted. NO ACTION NECESSARY ******** Salem Laundry building (Central St. side) (Robert Scagliotti refrained from voting) The owner of the Salem Laundry building would like to convert the first two bays, on the Central St. side, into stores. MINUTES OF UIE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD FEB. 28, 1979 Page 2 j The building is in need of repair. It will be necessary to clean and coat the existing concrete below the proposed window sections. The DRB approved the full length ," clear plate glass in black hardcoat finish frames and aluminum panel with black hardcoat finish above the glass. The bulkhead concrete will remain and will be cleaned and coated. DRB ACTION: Approved full lenggth'J " glass in black hardcoat finish frames and aluminum panel with black hardcoat finish over the glass sections. SRA ACTION: Approved Lyceum Restaurant Patio Dining Area - Joan Boudreau Joan Boudreau submitted a sample of the awning and screening for review as requested by the DRB at the last meeting. The method of construction was reviewed and it was recommended that it would look ybetter if the screening line could be set back to allow for the planters to be placed outside the screening. The DRB felt that it really would not be necessary to enclose the outside dining area. They felt that most people,who like to eat outdoors, do not mind the inconven- iences of outdoor dining and that possibly just the awning would be sufficient. The DRB felt that the enclosure is really bringing the wall of the building closer to Salem Green and would make the building obscure. DRB ACTION: Approved the awning (color) , screening,with the recommendation that it be set back to allow for the planters to be located outside the screening. SRA ACTION: Approved with recommendation that the screening beset back Market Stall Area - Salem Fish Market Plans were presented showing the recommended changes for the enclosure (rough board in herringbone pattern) . The door, as recommended, was shown as it would appear in the day time with a clear plastic panel and for the night the door would be covered by a wooden door to prevent vandalism. v MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD FEB. 28, 1979 Page 3 The matter of the ventilation system was discussed. Mr. Burke was advised that he would be allowed to bring the duct work through the roof so that he will have his equipment inside the structure. The Board reviewed the sign locations. DRB ACTION: Approved the "Salem Fish Market"sign Approved a sign for the east elevation (to be submitted) Approved a "Take Out" sign (lettering to be under two inches) Approved the enclosure pattern (rough board, herringbone pattern) Approved the interior installation of the duct work SRA ACTION: Approved ********** Pickering Wharf - Victoria Station Site In order to accommodate the air conditioning equipment and a marina office, it will be necessary to add to the existing building. The addition will extend out onto the open space since there is no other place to locate the addition. The developer will maintain the five foot walkway. DRB ACTION: Approved ******** Pickering Wharf - Building "G" A "Food Hall" is to be located on the ground floor of building "G". Fans are to be located on the roof top. No detailed description of the fan type was submitted. The Board agreed that the Architect will have the opportunity to review a cut of the design and if it is not acceptable in appearance, it will be submitted to the DRB at its next meeting, March 14th. Changes in the entrances was proposed since the building was originally intended for multi-store use and is now going to be one total operation. DRB ACTION: Entrance changes approved. Other minor building changes approved. ************ Respectfully submitted, Ethel C. Crowell Salem . Redevelopment Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744-6900 MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD WEDNESDAY, FEB. 14, 1979 The members of the Design Review Board met for its regular meeting Wednesday, February 14, 1979, with the following members present: Robert Scagliotti, Helen Baldwin, Annie Harris, John Wright and Ronald Barnes. Norbert Florendo is recorded absent. The Board reviewed the following proposals: Lyceum Restaurant - Joan Boudreau It was proposed to enclose the outdoor dining area with an awning and screening. The awning would be canvas material and they would use heavy stock aluminum for the frame and the screening will be aluminum material. The location of the existing sign was discussed as to whether or not it will be visible after the awning is installed. A recommendation was made to consider placing the name of the restaurant on the awning. The Board noted that they would like a resubmission of samples for the frame, screening, and a large sample of the canvas for the awning, as well as scaled drawings showing how the frame and awning will be attached to the building. DRB ACTION: Approved the concept of the framing, awning and screening for the out- door dining area Resubmission required for samples noted above and scaled drawings showing method of construction. 3-7 Central St. - George Maguire It was proposed by Mr. Houle, Pelletier Shade Co. , that the frame_..used for the the original awning has been located and will replace the existing frame to eliminate the arm on the frame. The arm, as it is now, is too low and is hazardous to pedestrian traffic. Mr. Maguire advised the Board that he was advised by the Building Inspector's office that there is a question as to the legal height under the City's and the State's Code and an� opinion will have to be obtained from the City Solicitor. 3 1 MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD FEB. 14, 1979 Page Z • The Board noted that they would prefer to see the awning installed below the transom, but if it is a legal requirement, it will have to be located above the transom in accordance with the Code. The hardware for the building is approved as installed. The DRB approved 6" painted (gold leaf) address numbers on the doorway and noted that they would prefer to see 19th century style numbers. DRB ACTION: Approved hardware Gold leaf painted address numbers on the doors Approved the color for the awning SRA ACTION: Approved Market Stall in Derby Sq. - Robert Rumpf and Mr. Burke Mr. Burke stated he would like to locate an all year round fish market in the stalls opposite the YUM YUM INN location. The stalls would have to be enclosed and he proposed to use plywood material The DRB recommended vertical boards be used to enclose the area using a herringbone pattern. • A ventilation system was discussed. Mr. Burke stated that he planned on using stainless steel for the duct system. This matter is to be studied to find the best location which would not be visible by the public. The Board requested that detailed drawings be submitted as soon as possible showing the ventilation system, enclosure treatment as well as sample of the wood, the stain, hardware,and sign system. As far as the sign is concerned the Board agreed that a sign would be necessary on the gable end of the building and the Board recommended the use of a banner on the Derby Sq. side. Mr. Burke stated that in this day of vandalism, he does not want to use too much glass. The DRB felt that the building should look open and inviting to the public and recommended that he install a glass door of some type for the daytime and he could have a wooden door which can be hooked back during the day and would cover the glass door at night. DRB ACTION: Resubmission required Joshua Ward House - Staley McDermet Preliminary plans were presented for the rehabilitation of the Joshua Ward House. The existing storefront will be taken down to expose the original building. The entrance will be landscaped. The partial granite foundation will be retained to form a retaining wall.on one side and salvage the brick wall for the other side along the • landscaped entrance. Other exterior changes will include redoing the roof line which has been totally rebuilt over the years; reconstruct the string course over the second floor windows; adding architectural features over the front doorway. v MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD FEB. 14, 1979 Page 3 • The building is being restored to the 1800 period. Minor changes will be made, to the Dunkin Donut building next to the Joshua Ward House. Staley McDermet is requesting preliminary approval on the plan submitted, which will also require approval by the Mass. Historic Commission. DRB ACTION: Approved the preliminary plans presented SRA ACTION: Approved Universalist Church The DRB reviewed the paint samples for the doors. DRB ACTION: Approved "Essex Green ' paint for the Church doors. SRA ACTION: Approved Peabody Museum - Peter Fetchko Preliminary plans were presented for work to be done along Liberty and Charter Street Peabody Museum property. They now have a chain link fence enclosing the property with a hot top parking area. They would like to decrease the size of the parking area, install a cast iron fence and landscape the area, and redo the sidewalk. The parking area will be used by Museum staff only. They would like to plant large trees on the site to block the view of the parking lot. The Museum is waiting for a commitment from the SRA to assist them financially in completing this work. As soon as that is finalized they will know when they will be able to start the work. It was recommended that detailed landscape drawings be prepared and submitted to the DRB as soon as they are ready. The DRB requested that the landscape architect attend the next meeting. Places and People - Salem Planning Dept. A preliminary meeting was held to discuss the proposed murals for the corner lot at Essex and Washington Street. The Planning Dept. staff, owners of the buildings adjacent to the corner lot (Merchants Bank and Mansfield's) attended the meeting to • provide input on the proposed themes. Various themes were suggested; residential building, both interior and exterior; commercial; transportation; and a period of rehabilitation construction as well as the use of old time advertising such as the Parker Bros. type advertising. Y � A MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD FEB. 14, 1979 Page 4 • The Board felt that they could relate to the themes better, if they could see drawings. David Lash of the Planning Dept. explained that this meeting is primarily to get an input as to which direction we would take in making a final presentation. It was agreed that possible alternatives should be presented at another meeting showing the interior and exterior of a residential building; rehabilita- tion work going on during the construction period. Pickering Wharf The Architect, Phil Briggs, emphasized that he will keep the DRB informed of any changes made at the Pickering Wharf Project. The building on the waterfront which will house the Victoria Station restaurant will need DRB approval within the next two weeks. Mr. Briggs advised the Board that there are awnings all through the project. The blue awning for the theatre building is to be replaced. A sample of the awning selected for the building was presented for approval (color sample #3013) . • The Board was advised that an interior sign system is being developed for the entire project, such as "Stop", "Do Not Enter", etc. and that they will keep the system consistent throughout the entire project area. DRB ACTION: Approved the awning color sample #10313 Respectfully submitted, Ethel C. Crowell i Salem • EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Redevelopment JOHN W. BARRETT Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744-6900 MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD JANUARY 10, 1979 The members of the Design Review Board held its meeting on Wednesday, January 10, 1979 with the following members present: Robert Scagliotti, Helen Baldwin and John Wright. The following proposals were reviewed: As You Like It - sign for the Essex Street restaurant The owner of the restaurant presented a sketch of the sign showing style and letter type. He stated that he plans to make the sign himself and use plywood material. The DRB discouraged the use of plywood since they felt that it would splinter • in the process of trying to rout out the letters. The DRB recommended that the owner contact a sign maker to seek advice on letter spacing and height, color combinations, visibility and material before coming in with another submission. The DRB agreed to hold a special meeting, if necessary. Kinsman Block Facade - Staley McDermet A revised facade plan was presented showing alternate schemes should anyone of the tenants desire to redo the store front. DRB ACTION: Approved scheme A,B,C,D AND C (opposite hand) . SRA ACTION: Approved 1%4INUTES OF THE DRB. MEETING, JAN. 10, 1979. Page 2, Essex Stationery sign for Church St: building The sign designer, Mr. Matthew Rillovick, represented Essex� Stationery. He apologized for not coming before the Design Review Board,before installing the sign. There was an existing sign .there and he felt that .the consolidation of the company, would allow the new sign to be installed without additional approval.. Mr. Rillovick stated that he would be willing to do whatever the'Board requires. , The DRB reviewed the existing hanging sign'on the building located" at One Church St. Robert,Scagliotti noted that he. has no objection to the sign. John Wright approved 'the ,sign. Helen.Baldwin disapproved the sign. The Project Administrator recommended that the vote',go before the SRA Board since it does not constitute a majority vote of. the.DRB. DRB ACTION: : 2 votes in favor,f _1 opposed , d / f r SRA ACTION. - .Approved £z �, }t:: ftt� Tt 99 Washington St 6th Congressional District sign. = Salem Sign. Co. Sketches were presented by Salem, Sign Co. for the installation of a sign in the " center window area as well as a proposed sign over -the whole window.section. ; The DRB noted that. two sign are not, allowed in accordance with the sign manual. DRB ACTION: Approved the sign in the center window as presented. Disapproved repeating the. same sign over the window section. SRA ACTION: :Approved Salem Sign Co. noted that. Bistro LeBistingo is having-a problem with the sign' being seen at night. The problem is due to`,the position of the lightsaround the. sign. The matter was-discussed and alternatives were recommended in regard to,.the size of the light bulbs. "Salem.Si.gn thought the problem could be resolved by 'installing a projecting light fixture over the sign. DRB ACTION,: Disapproved any type of projecting light fixture due to the character of the building and the sign. It was noted that the temporary sign for the Bistro Lounge will be removed shortly. • SRA 'ACTION. No action necessary ` �OuNums OF THE DRB MEETING HELD JAN.. 10, 1979 Page 3 • Magus - Essex Street Proposal A preliminary presentation was made in regard to the future plans for the - building as a cultural arts center. The Board was advised that there would be no change in the roof line but the roof will have to be repaired. The brick work will be cleaned and repaired. Drawings will be submitted at a later date. The first phase will be interior renovations. The DRB stated that they are enthusiastic about the project and will be anxious . to see it start. East India Square Mall - Elliot Schrank Mr. Schrank explained that there is a problem in regard to finding a restaurant for the. Essex St. Mall. They would like to: install a temporary plywood wall until they secure a tenant for the area facing the East India Square Fountain. The plywood wall would be similar to the existing temporary wall at the Brown/Church. Street ele- - vation. DRB ACTION: No objection to the temporary wall. SRA ACTION: No objection At this time the Board seviewed,,the �Developers Guide-to the Design Review ' Board's Review Process ' for buildings and sign It was agreed a7i t this guide should —erevieweby theDRB..and;SRA'for; -formal`action by-both-Boards. iy � ✓ The DRB Chairman rioted that a7t 'nor rtime should anyone be placed on the agenda until they have recieved a copy of the guidelines for each particular presentation. 'Phe SRA Project Engineer discussed the Design Criteria for Heritage Plaza-East that will in all likelyhood be carried over for the Heritage Plaza-West plan and it was recommended that each member of the Board read over the Design Criteria for - Heritage Plaza-East for discussion at the next,DRB. meeting. Respectfully submitted, Ethel C. Crowell i "