25 PICKMAN ROAD - BUILDING INSPECTION
)b�oiy
REGISTRY:
TITLE REFERENCE:
PLAN REFERENCE:
� l
"i
I QAoQvsE�I b` n
I 14xb v ' 1vY
i
rc 0`T Z
1. Q0 Off•
1
�tEr epl I
�a /wo• AS �
I j� IGK M►�� RSD
Viis plan was not prepared from an instrument survey. MORTGAGE INSPECTION PLAN
Offsets and distances show6t should not be used to
esti.blish property lines. LOCATION e71Z PYLKMt A) RQ This plan is intended for mYrtgage purposes only. SAL
J. certify that the structure shown on this Plan SCALE- � : �fZ DATE: /0LD-a,
yYAS in conform4ace with zoning setbacks
in effect at the time of construction. CERTIFIED TO:
I certify that the parcel shoiwn is-Agflocated within
a flood hazard area as depict 'd on HUD.flood Insurance
Ratr Maps for CommunityW:: cp-so 01? .
CAMERON BRO1HERS INC. lob No. -
11 Touro Ave. N';:df'ord, Ma (781) 324-9566 _
C .•0:^.Ci n11'r`�`r" In".7 : ?C QI I WNiC' f ^,l 7 • G i 0 6
CITY OF SALEM9 MASSACHUSETTS
Ewa BOARD OF APPEAL
120 WASHINGTON STREET, 3RD FLOOR
SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 -
V Cl)
STANLEY J. USOVICZ, JR. TELEPHONE: 978-745-9595 0 ny
MAYORFAX: 978-740-9846 ` r--<
rnC
r MO
00 N>
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF SCOT STERNBERG REQUESTING A Or-
VM.
ARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 25 PICKMAN ROAD R-1 D
C;?
r*13
A hearing on this petition was held on July 14,2004 with the following Board MembAj m
present;Nina Cohen Chairman,Bonnie Belair, Stephen Harris,Joseph Barbeau and
Edward Moriarty. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the
hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with
Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
The petitioner is requesting a Variance from side yard setback to enclose the existing
deck for the property located at 25 Pickman Road located in an R-I zone.
The Variances,which have been requested, may be granted upon a finding by this Board
that:
a. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land,
building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands,
buildings and structures involve.
b. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve
substantial hardship, financial or otherwise,to the petitioners.
c. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good
and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district of
the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, atter careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing,
and atter viewing the plane,makes the following findings of fact:
1. The Petitioner appeared and represented himself at the hearing along with his
contractor.
2. The petitioner'requests a side yard setback to enclose his existing deck and create
a three season porch.
3. Petitioner submitted a petition with names of his abutters in favor of the petition.
4. James Shea of 23 Pickman Road appeared in opposition of the petition. He was
concerned the structure would be too close for his privacy and was suggested the
petitioner add a privacy screen with greenery and shrubs.
t
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF SCOT STEINBERG REQUESTING A ` r
VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 25 PICKMAN ROAD R-1 c' 7oQl
page two N x-n
m v;CA
On the basis of the above findings of fact,and on,the evidence presented at the hear*
the Zoning Board of Appeal concludes as follows: Q
rn3
N y
1. Special conditions exist when especially affect the subject property but not he'
District.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve
substantial hardship to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good
and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or
the purpose of the Ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted 5 in favor and 0 in opposition to grant the
Variances requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state stature, ordinance, codes and
regulations.
2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted and
approved by the Building Commissioner.
3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety
shall be strictly adhered to.
4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to beginning any construction.
5. Exterior finishes of the new construction shall be in harmony with the existing
structure.
6. Petitioner shall add a privacy screen with greenery and shrubs.
Variance Granted N/YL
July 14,2004 x/� J
Nma Cohen S' c 'K
Board of Appeal 7
CIO
N
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOAl2 ' c
AND THE CITY CLERK w.
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the
Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days date of filing
of this decision in the office of the City Clerk Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws
Chapter 40A, Section 11,the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take
effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certificate of the City Clerk that 20 days
have elapsed and no appeal has been filed,or that, if such appeal has been filed,that is
has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and
indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's
Certificate of Title.
Board of Appeal