Loading...
0056 MARGIN STREET SHC comment PROPOSED REUSE MAizf's 04 f2-CH - Piz dr65eD www.st ruct ur as-n ar th.con, 401 Structures Nott _ O_O ®®® Salem Hartford 60.,n,Massacusettngton St, ste97 L North Salem,Massachusetts 01970-3517 10C. P.O.Box 01971-8560 T 978.745.6817 I F 978.745.6067 56 Arbor Street,Suite 302 •i Hartford,Connecticut 06106-1201 Z5 January ZO1 O T 860 236,6817 F 860.236.6817 Morris Schopf,AIA 1 Cambridge Street Salem, MA 01970 Reference: Salem Mission, Salem, MA Dear Morris: I would like to quickly summarize the results of our meeting this morning in my office. • We are both in agreement that the existing former community center currently occupied by the Salem Mission is most likely incapable of supporting the structural loads created by the addition of one or more stories of construction bearing on top of it. Therefore, I have not felt that adding space over the existing structure in a traditional fashion, as had been previously proposed, was a feasible option. • You presented schematic level drawings showing an °a@emative plan" for adding residential space in modular units set onto a steel frame that spans over and around the existing structure, thereby bypassing it and not exerting any additional loads directly onto it. The frame would have columns that surround the existing building on four sides, bearing on "deep" foundations that bypass the existing foundation walls and basement floor, and diagonal bracing on the sides and rear of the structure. • Following a quick review of your suggested alternative, I concur with you that your general approach does in fact appear to be a structurally feasible and viable way of adding the needed space over the existing structure, as long as the cost of such construction proves to be economical. Respectfully your i John M. Wathne, PE, President Structures North Consulting Engineers, Inc. CC: Jessica Herbert!Salem Historical Commission i r'o'1 www.s ru ct u res-nort h.com Salem Hartford bO Washington St,Suite 401 Structures North 0O 1 I®® Salem,Massachusetts 01970-3517 C0fay,Siii"ilivf: I-INS IF i i06'r 1—:5, IiQr:. P.O.Box 01971-8560 T97&745.6817 I F978.745,6067 56 Arbor Street,Suite 302 it Ha Mord,Connecticut 06106-1201 25 January 2010 T 860.236.6817 F 860.236.6817 Jessica Herbert, Vice Chair Salem Historical Commission 120 Washington Street Salem, MA 01970 Reference: Former Saint Mary's Church, Salem, MA Dear Jessica: Having received your email in which Lifebridge is quoted as saying "the Church is in rapidly deteriorating condition and needing immediate major expenditures", I understand your concern regarding the current condition of the structure as this may effect its present status as an historic resource and it future disposition. As you are aware, I made a brief three-hour tour of the structure on 28 May 2009 and found it to be of a construction and condition that is typical of generally well-constructed early twentieth century structures built under the auspices of the Catholic Archdiocese of Boston, with which this office has vast experience (the Archdiocese is one of our on-going clients). During what basically amounted to an inspection I found no immediate signs of structural distress, or places where the building envelope had significantly been breached. Rather, I found a generally sound structure that appeared to have been well maintained during its service-life and relatively able to withstand at least several more years of the apparent deferred maintenance that has become its more recent reality. While I earnestly appreciate Lifebridge's present concerns, and even more greatly appreciate their mission within the community (I was a Crombie street volunteer for 17-years), I do not believe that the current condition of the building presents a sufficiently compelling case for accelerating an intervention that may or may not be the best and most appropriate use of the structure without properly completing the on-going process of vetting and review. Respectfully your hne, PE, President Structures North Consulting Engineers, Inc. CC: Jane Guy/Salem Historical Commission, Jason Silva/Office of the Mayor Jane Guy From: John Wathne Uwathne@structures-north.com] Sent: Monday, January 25, 2010 7:29 PM To: 'Jessica Herbert' Cc: Jane Guy. Jason Silva Subject: RE: Structural Condition of St. Mary's Church, Salem, MA Attachments: St Mary's conditions.pdf IJ St Mary's onditions.pdf(48 K. Hi Jessica- Please see the attached letter in response. -JMW John M. Wathne, PE, President Structures North Consulting Engineers, Inc. P.O. Box 5860 Salem, MA 01970 P: 978-745-6817 F: 978-745-6067 www. structures-north.com -----Original Message----- From: Jessica Herbert [mailto:Jherbert5@comcast.net] Sent: Monday, January 25, 2010 5:20 PM To: John Wathne Cc: Jane Guy; Jason Silva Subject: Structural Condition of St. Mary' s Church, Salem, MA John Wathne, P.E. Structures North Consulting Engineers, Inc. Salem, MA 01970 Dear John, The Salem Historical Commission voted on September 9, 2009 to send a response letter to Massachusetts Historical Commission (MHC) , as a part of the Section #106 Review Process, stating that we find that removal of the stained glass windows of St. Mary's Church will have a seriously adverse effect on this historic building, which we feel is eligible for registration on both the State and National Historical Registers of Historical Places. That application is pending with MHC now. We have further encouraged MHC to strongly encourage the applicant to look at reasonable alternatives for its proposed development of 20 transitional units for its formerly homeless residents. A comprehensive Alternative Plan has been submitted to Lifebridge (formerly Salem Mission) board of directors for review at its January 20, 2010 meeting. We are concerned that Lifebridge may not give full consideration to this plan, as it has indicated on various occasions, particularly in email to me on 1/20/10, that the Church is in rapidly deteriorating condition and needs immediate structural attention. As you had been asked to look at the Church building this summer, and give an opinion as to its structural condition, we would appreciate it if you could share your conclusions as to the soundness of the building. We very much appreciate your professional opinion in helping us respond to MHC on this very important project. 1 The Commonwealth of !Massachusetts September 16,200,Wtlliain Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth ,% r �t Massachusetts Historical Commission Dam Weedor n c/o Winter Street Architects r 209 Essex Street _ lj Salem. NIA 01 970 RE: Phase Ili, Salem Mission Sceds iii Hop,Can-ipos_56 Margin Street, Salem. MA_ M110, RCJ3744 Deur Mr. Weeder: The Massachusetts Historical Commission(MHC)has reviewed the additional information you submitted, received August 17,2009, concerning the proposed project referenced above. As you are away, the subject property at 56 Martin sucet stay be eligible tbr;isting in the iAational Register of I listoric Places (36 CPR 60). Afier a review of the inlbnmai.ion i:uhnutied, ('APIC staff have the foliowing.comments. Phase ill of the proposed project,consisting of the exterior and interior renovaion of 1925 masonry church for the incorporation of twenty affordable Fortin__ units is descrihed hn the Project Notification Form that was submitted to this office, received June_t5,Z009. 'file MHC appreciates receiving the rcnuested additional information concerning the subject property. Due - to the complexity of ownership of[he property over the.,years,the Ml IC requests information concernin.L, ownership during the early years of'he Church. Ihe MHC aso requests a completed Fora 13,which can be downloaded !lam the MI IC website at rte ac§ec srnc.�:n,!.us nlu•, for the subject properly to assist MHC in making an eligibility opinion of the properlv(3t1('Fit 800A). Duc to the likely association between the Church and adjacent buildings as part of a complex. z completed Font.A for the once-related church buildings would also likely be helpfel :S the MHC cc,nences to evaluate the historic intmity of the property. These comments are oflerzd to assist in compliance v..af,Section Ifi?i o the NanormI Historic preservation Act of 1966-as amended(36 CFR 800),;and M-C.i.. Chapter 9.Senior, 2_6-27C,as amended by Chapter 254 of the Acts of 1933 X950 CMR 71.00). Pica>e c%o hvt nesiiate w contact ane at thi>orrice if You!nave any questions. Sincerely, Rya cicj Prescrvatirm Planncr MatsSaCh U..settS Historical ibmaysscn xc: JoAnn Mc(ink", HON4F \1111 A Sa)cm Historical C t-mllnssice I iistoz;e saiena Inc. Presr,r vat ion Sa lain F:ndico t Street Nciat.horhoud Associaiioit =2{) mot issev J3ol.tlevat d, Ho,lon. Mta,ssacllusetts 021.5 (61 7) 737-817(i _- I'a:c '617) 72-IL S I -)g vnJc,: s!at�f n;rt usistx/tnh� Monday, September 21 st, 2009 Ryan Maciej via Fax: 617-727-5126, & Regular Mail Preservation Planner Massachusetts Historical Commission 220 Morrissey Boulevard Boston, MA 02125 RE: Additional Information on Phase III, Salem Mission Seeds of Hope Campus, 56 Margin Street, Salem, MA; MHC#RC.35744 Dear Mr. Maciej: As a member of the Salem Historical Commission, I have been forwarded a copy of the Winter Street Architects September 16`h, 2009 letter to Massachusetts Historical Commission regarding the above referenced project, and I feel the need to respond. Because the Commission does not meet again until October 7, 2009, this letter is my response as an individual member of the Commission and my comments have not been voted on by the Commission as a whole. The position remains firm that removing the stained glass windows from St. Mary's Church will result in a severely adverse effect on this important and prominent historic building, for which you have received application for placement of it on the National Register of Historic Places on September Ioth, 2009. I also confirm, for the record,that the Salem Mission has not provided concrete evidence that they cannot build their desired 20-unit expansion on the Youth Center vs. the Church. In Mr. Weeder's letter, the list of"9 reasons" against building on the Youth Center provides no documentation of actual cost estimates obtained to support the arguments made. In addition, many of the Mission's "9 reasons" against building on the Youth Center are the same issues that will be faced with the construction on the Church. The Church presents more challenges than the Youth Center, as the Church has minimal plumbing and electrical resources, no elevator, and no estimate of costs of removal of hazardous materials. Conversely, the Youth Center already has all of these elements. Lastly, the Mission has not addressed the option of operating the Mission's day-to-day activities in the Church during the 9-12 month construction period for the Youth Center. Also, in Mr. Weeder's letter, he left the impression that the Commission was in error in its September 9, 2009 letter to MHC, where we stated that"it is our understanding that the development of the twenty unit affordable housing project would be in the $3.4 million range..." The Salem Historical Commission was given the figure of$3.4million in Project Costs by Andrew Oliver on the August 20`h, 2009 site visit. In my phone conversation with Dana Weeder on September 1 g`h, 2009, after receiving his letter, he confirmed that the $3.4million figure for Project Costs was correct. J Page two, 9/21/09 It is quite clear that the Salem Mission's proposed 20-unit expansion project is vastly premature, and needs more professional review in terms of both appropriate location, and realistic project costs. It should be noted that on September 9`h, 2009, the Salem City Council overwhelmingly passed a resolution "against"the Salem Mission's proposal to convert St. Mary's Church to housing. I thank you for your consideration of this additional information, and trust that MHC will assure that all prudent and feasible alternatives to destroying defining elements of this important historic building are explored. If you need any further information, I stand ready to reply immediately. Respectfully,. Jessica Herbert Vice-Chair, Salem Historical Commission 978-479-9325 cc: Congressman John Tierney Senator Frederick Berry Representative John Keenan Mayor Kim Driscoll City Councilor, Joan Lovely Andrew Oliver, President of Salem Mission Dana Weeder, Winter Street Architects Jane Guy & Salem Historical Commission Members " Salem Community Arts Center s r 57 Wharf Street#3F Salem MA 01970 } www.salemcommunityartscenter.org info@salemcommunityatscenter.org (978) 902-7582 SCIR ::ilc„r2€�,m1.Mi!'Iygn"Ba€:nPknP '"" tO VELj ; 3 2009 6 October 2009 EOML PL:A Mr. Ryan T Maciej �W�. d(dEP1T Preservation Planner Massachusetts Historical Commission 220 Morrissey Boulevard Boston, MA 02125 RE: Phase III Salem Mission Seeds of Hope Campus-St. Mary's Italian Church: MHC#RC.35744 Dear Mr. Maciej, I am in receipt of a copy of a letter you addressed to Winter Street architects 'requesting more .information about the history of ownership of St. Mary's Italian Church of Salem`1 thought I would send you the enclosed materials per chance they provided the Massachusetts Historical Commission with any pertinent information they might find helpful;,lncluded is a history of the church that was compiled by Regina Camarda'(a former StMary's parishioner)and a copy'. opy of a DVD I produced that gives a shortrendition of the church's history, details events around its closing and firings the story to the present. This film was created as a gift to the parishioners back in 2003 when St. Mary's was suppressed by the Archdiocese of Boston and updated this past July. As a resident of the neighborhood in which the Mission operates and as a leader of the group that hopes to save St. Mary's art and culture by preserving it in the form of a community arts center that connects with the Salem Mission's residents, I want you to know that our efforts continue.We have been encouraged by the Salem City Council, Mayor Kimberly Driscoll, Representative John Keenan, local historical associations, former parishioners, the arts community and the vast majority of Salem citizens. Despite the overwhelming sentiment in Salem that St Mary's should be preserved, The Salem Mission has publicly stated that they are continuing their effort to convert this precious resource into housing while turning a deaf ear to alternate housing plans. We carry forward our effort with no ill will towards the Salem Mission and its admirable goals. It is clear to us that the Mission's desire to create additional affordable housing units in our neighborhood can be achieved in the Mission Center building directly next to the church or in other housing already available in the community.While this is a possibility-a possibility that the Mission was ready to move on before the idea of converting the'church was supposedly, suggested by their'architects-there is no possibility to replicate St Mary's, and all that ifineans to our community, in any other location. The Mission claims that this housing must be done in St. Mary's and that all other locations are unsuitable because of a combination of reasons involving proximity;feasibility and cost. At the same time it is clear from their many public statements that the Mission intends to create A additional housing units beyond their proposed St Mary's/Phase III plans. These two statements are contradictory—in the first concept it can only happen in St Mary's, while in the second they intend to build beyond St Mary's. Our urging is that they concentrate on those other possibilities now and leave St Mary's to the community that loves it as it is. The Mission's board initially gave the community arts group a 30 day window to raise an unspecified amount of funds (generally considered to be between$500,000 and $1,000,000)to make them an offer on St Mary's. At the time we were not a formalized group. In just the last few months, among other things,we have created a formal corporate entity, assisted the creation of a neighborhood organization, held meetings with many local groups, helped motivate city council hearings, rallied the arts and historical communities, held three fundraisers and raised over $20,000(mostly from individuals).We have yet to even approach most of the businesses that have offered to provide us financial support or to apply for any corporate funding or grants. We are waiting for a clearer sign that the Salem's Mission plans will be slowed down enough so that our alternative use can be seriously considered and developed into a workable plan. We will clearly be able to draw on many more resources once the community truly believes the Salem Mission is serious about negotiating with us, and once they present a clear and reasonable monetary goal for us to achieve. We have heard of many businesses and individuals who have promised additional and more significant backing once we get to the negotiating table. We have researched foundation, state, federal, corporate, international and Italian cultural sources that we would then be able to submit applications to. The Salem Community Arts Center is also willing to work with the Mission towards compromise plans. Two possibilities are obvious. The first would entail the Mission splitting the building into two condo units. The Salem Community Arts Center would purchase, preserve and run the magnificent upstairs sanctuary with its Bavarian stained glass windows, pipe organ, marble, murals and other artwork,while the Mission would continue to run the ground floor of the building as its Second Chance Thrift Shop(which annually produces over$130,000 a year of income). In a second scenario we would become a permanent renter/preserver of the upstairs with the thrift shop continuing downstairs. Both of these concepts preserve the church while creating a revenue stream for its upkeep and for the Salem Mission. Thank you for your time and for the consideration that you and the Massachusetts Historical Commission are putting into this matter. I trust that our community's efforts to preserve its history, culture and art will eventually come to fruition. Sincerely, Joe Cultrera President, Salem Community Arts Center Cc: Mayor Kimberly Driscoll Congressman John Tierney Senator Fredrick Berry Representative John Keenan Councilor Joan Lovely Councilor Steven Pinto Councilor John Pelletier Salem Historical Commission Historic Salem Inc Greater Endicott Street Neighborhood Association a ' Salem Historical Commission 120 WASHINGTON STREET,SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 (978) 745-9595 EXT. 311 FAX (978) 740-0404 September 9, 2009 Ryan T. Maciej Preservation Planner Massachusetts Historical Commission , 220 Morrissey Boulevard Boston, MA 02125 RE: Phase 11I, Salem Mission Seeds of Hope Campus, 56 Margin Street, Salem, MA MHC# RC.35744 Dear Mr. Maciej: The Salem Historical Commission is pleased to comment on the Salem Mission's "Seeds of Hope"expansion project proposal in response to Massachusetts Historical Commission's (MHC) letter to Winter Street Architects dated July 24, 2009, Winter Street Architects' letter to MHC dated August 14, 2009 and the Project Notification Form submitted on June 24, 2009. We understand that the former St. Mary's Church building(1925) is proposed to be converted to twenty affordable residential apartments for Salem's previously.homeless individuals. As we understand, under the current proposal, the exterior of the masonry church building would not be altered with the exception of: (1) The removal of the small wood two-story addition attached to the rear of the church building; (2) The addition of two clear glass windows to the first and third floors; (3) The addition of a 4' elevator override; and (4) The removal of all of the original stained glass windows and the replacement of those windows with new energy efficient windows in the same size and mullion pattern. While the Salem Historical Commission supports restoration, rehabilitation, and reuse of historic buildings to insure their presence for future generations, the position of the Commission is that the church building will very likely be eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places and that the removal of the stained glass windows will have a substantial adverse effect on this prominently located historic property. Page 2 9/9/09 To provide some background on the expansion project, as we understand it, the Salem Mission initially considered construction of an additional floor to the former youth center building, also located on the campus, in order to achieve its twenty residential unit objective. We understand that that concept was then abandoned due to concern over the potential disruption of the Salem Mission's day-to-day activities during the 9 to 12 month construction period. The Salem Historical Commission has had a very short window to review the Salem Mission's current proposal, but over the last few days since we learned the details of the project at our regular meeting on August 19, 2009, Commission members have been able to tour the Salem Mission campus of four buildings, particularly the two buildings in question - the former church building (now used as a thrift shop)and the former youth center(now housing Salem Mission operations). Members have also explored other affordable housing reuse projects of former church buildings. One example is St. Patrick's Church project in Cambridge, MA which received Federal, State and local funding. In this 1992 project, a total of 8 original stained and colored glass windows of various sizes and subject matter were retained. The majority of stained glass windows were removed and replaced with varying clear glass configurations. It is our understanding that the development of the twenty unit affordable housing project would be in the $3.4 million range if construction were to utilize the church building, while a somewhat smaller total expenditure would be required if utilizing the youth center building. Therefore, we feel that a more complete review of the option of using the youth center building vs. the church building is crucial in order to allow consideration of other uses for the church building that will retain the stained glass windows. After speaking with a senior construction professional with extensive knowledge in such renovations, we are encouraged that the church building could potentially provide a very satisfactory temporary facility for the Salem Mission's day-to-day activities during the construction period while the youth center building is being expanded. This might include the addition of two bathrooms, a temporary prep-kitchen, and several partitions in the church building. Furthermore, preliminarily inspection of the youth center building indicates that, subject to a formal engineering review, the youth center building appears structurally capable of supporting an additional story. At the same time, the entire existing fagade of the building could be creatively altered to bring the building into harmony with the other buildings on the campus. Under the Salem Mission's current plan, nothing will be done to the exterior of the youth center building, which is a very utilitarian 1950's eyesore. Therefore, we feel that if the Salem Mission were to go back to its original concept to expand upon the youth center building, it could: (1) Enhance the Salem downtown area with the renovation of the youth center building into a handsome new building designed in concert with the church building and the other substantial 1920's brick buildings on the campus. J Page 3 9/9/09 (2) Potentially save a considerable amount of construction expense. (3) Retain the current substantial $130,000 annual income stream from the thrift shop operation on the first floor of the church building, while developing a more creative, long-term plan for the reuse of the church building that would allow a less destructive change to the exterior. Thus, more time could be allowed to explore alternative proposals, such as the recent proposal for a performing arts center(which might add an additional element of on-campus cultural exposure for the Salem Mission residents). (4) Receive the support of the community. In conclusion, we wholeheartedly support the Salem Mission and its efforts to reduce homelessness, and we are looking forward to a permanent reuse of the church building. However, we feel removal of the stained glass windows has an adverse effect on the historic fabric of the building. To mitigate this adverse effect, we encourage other alternatives for the development of housing, particularly the original plan of construction above the former youth center. Finally, we encourage creative thinking about the reuse of the church building, and will make ourselves available to assist the Salem Mission with design questions relating to historic appropriateness and any other ways we can help with the success of this project. Yours erely, Je sica erbert Vice Chairman Cc: Mayor Kimberley Driscoll Lynn Duncan, Director of Planning & Community Development Andrew Oliver, Salem Mission Dana Weeder, Winter Street Architects WINTER STREET ARCHITECTS RECEIVED SEP 1 8 2009 DEPT. OF PLali%G& COA.;AiUr!i(Y DEVELOP>AE?JT September 16, 2009 Ryan T. Maciej Preservation Planner Massachusetts Historical Commission 220 Morrissey Boulevard Boston, MA 02125 Cc: John Tierney-Congressman Frederick Berry-State Senator John Keenan-State Representative Kim Driscoll- Mayor of Salem `ane Guy-Salem Historical Commission' Re: Salem Mission Seeds of Hope III, 56 Margin Street, Salem, MA MHC# RC.35744 Dear Mr. Maciej: We have reviewed the Salem Historic Commission's (SHC) letter to the Massachusetts Historical Commission regarding the Salem Mission's'Seeds of Hope III' project dated September 91h, 2009 and found that while the letter is generally accurate,there are a few items that are either misleading or in error and require further clarification. At the conclusion of the Salem Historical Commission meeting on August 19, 2009,the Salem Historical Commission asked the Salem Mission to respond to two items: 1) The commission asked that the Salem Mission provide a strategy for removing the windows...who and how much? Is it a reputable firm? 2) The commission asked for a well reasoned argument for not adding to the Youth Center. The Salem Mission has offered to work with its Ward Councilor and former parishioners to try to locate the families of the donors of the stained glass windows,wall murals and statuary, and has „ offered to return any of these items to the families or to donate them to churches of their 209 Essex Street Suite 300 Salem, Massachusetts 01970 978.744.7379 . WINTER STREET ARCHITECTS choice. In addition, an approach has been made to the Peabody Essex Museum in Salem to see if it would be interested in receiving any items that cannot be returned or donated. And finally, the Boston Archdiocese has offered to remove and store the windows and to redistribute them to other churches. The Archdiocese has provided this service for a number of church renovations. The Salem Mission initially hoped that housing could be constructed over the existing Youth Center and asked Winter Street Architects(WSA) to assess feasibility. WSA provided the Salem Mission with an approach that only provided 8-10 apartments on one additional floor and existing zoning laws would not allow the construction of two additional floors. This would reduce the number of shelter beds that the Mission is able to eliminate, resulting in fewer formerly homeless people being housed and more homeless people remaining on the Mission's campus. WSA also assessed the structural implications of building over the existing 1950's Youth Center. We spoke to the structural engineer of record for the recent renovation of the Youth Center who confirmed that the building, like many buildings constructed in the 1950's, utilizes un- reinforced masonry construction that cannot support the load of an additional floor. An additional floor could be added if supported by new columns, but this approach is cost prohibitive for the following reasons: 1) Existing rooftop equipment would have to be removed and re-routed. 2) Existing roof structure would have to be removed in order to accommodate the increased live loads of occupied space. 3) Reduced SF in existing building due to a required new elevator. 4) Upgrades required for fire suppression equipment, electrical, sewer,water and fire alarm. 5) Existing structural system may require underpinning in order to accommodate foundations for the new structure. 6) Increased costs associated with penetrating existing spaces and coordinating existing and new construction. 7) An additional floor will trigger seismic upgrades to the entire existing building. 8) Cost of hazardous material removal. 9) An additional floor will trigger energy code compliance for the entire existing structure, i.e. new windows etc. The above speaks to the very real concern to the Mission of the increased costs associated with building over the Youth Center. We received two estimates for the construction cost of building 20 units in the 'church site' (as opposed to the 3.4 million project cost cited in the letter from WINTER STREET ARCHITECTS the Salem Historical Commission). One estimate came in at 1.94 million and the other came in at 1.99 million. WSA's estimated construction cost for building above the existing Youth Center is about the same, but it only provids half of the units (one floor). The church site is already at the upper end of what the State will fund in terms of development cost per unit, construction cost per square foot and overall public funding requirements. The Mission has also been advised that funding for the shelter would be transferred along with the residents and this would cause serious funding problems for the Mission, i.e. if there are no residents,there is no funding. If there is no funding, the Mission would have to lay off staff and good staff is key to the work the Mission is doing. And finally,the meals program serves 9,000 meals a month to the entire community. Closing that program would cause hardship to the community. Even more of a concern to the Mission however, is the fact that the center would need to be closed during a good portion of construction. Closing the shelter for a period of time would eliminate the only local emergency shelter services and could substantially increase the number of homeless individuals forced to sleep outside without critical support services. With only three adult shelters in the North Shore area,the Salem Mission operates 34 of the North Shore region's 66 total emergency beds. All three shelters already operate at full capacity and over. The Salem Mission has communicated these facts to the SHC, but the SHC letter to the Massachusetts Historical Commission contains factual errors that need to be addressed/ clarified. 1) The letter states that, "a somewhat smaller total expenditure would be required if utilizing the youth center building". This, as stated above, is not the case. WSA provided the Mission with a conceptual plan for building one additional floor and the cost for that floor(8-10 units) was approximately the same cost as the 20 unit project proposed in the 'church site'. Given that the'church site' proposal is already at the upper end of what the state will fund in terms of development costs per unit, housing above the Youth Center is'Just not feasible. 2) The letter further states that, "preliminary inspection of the youth center building indicates that, subject to a formal engineering review,the Youth Center building appears structurally capable of supporting an additional story". This is a dangerous and misleading statement. If a "preliminary inspection" was conducted by the Salem Historic Commission, it was done without the knowledge of the Salem Mission and conducted from the street. To state that the building "appears structurally capable" does not make it so. As stated previously,we have spoken to a structural engineer, who, as the engineer of record for a previous renovation, has extensive knowledge of this building. WINTER STREET ARCHITECTS 3) And finally, when referring to our initial study to build above the Youth Center,the letter states that, "the concept was then abandoned due to concern over the potential disruption of the Salem Mission's day-to-day activities during the 9-12 month construction period". This is an understatement. The building would have to be closed, funding would be suspended and staff laid off. The Salem Mission is defined by its noble goal of ending homelessness. It is a well run organization that has proven itself to be a valuable citizen to the City of Salem...a sentiment that is shared by nearly all. Its leadership has demonstrated the organizational skills and capacity required to tackle the challenging problem of homelessness...and they are succeeding. It is precisely this type of leadership and organization that is required to secure the funding needed to facilitate the preservation of St. Mary's. We believe St. Mary's church is a beautiful structure. It has a quiet street presence, well proportioned massing, and admittedly, beautiful stained glass windows. It is an austere building that has played an important role in Salem's urban fabric since 1925, but it is also a building in need of attention. "Historic preservation", in the words of Ada Louise Huxtable, "is not sentimentality but a psychological necessity. We must learn to cherish history and to preserve worthy old buildings...we must learn how to preserve them, not as pathetic museum pieces, but by giving them new uses." The Salem Mission has found a new use for this wonderful building and has put forth the only realistic plan to fund its preservation. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Winter Str et Architects, Inc. Dana Weeder AIA LEEDAP I Principal t �'mra Salem Historical Commission 120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 (978).745-9595 EXT. 311 FAX (978) 740-0404 September 9, 2009 Ryan T. Maciej Preservation Planner Massachusetts Historical Commission 220 Morrissey Boulevard Boston, MA 02125 RE: Phase III, Salem Mission Seeds of Hope Campus, 56 Margin Street, Salem, MA MHC# RC.35744 Dear Mr. Maciej: The Salem Historical Commission is pleased to comment on the Salem Mission's "Seeds of Hope"expansion project proposal in response to Massachusetts Historical Commission's (MHC) letter to Winter Street Architects dated July 24, 2009, Winter Street Architects' letter to MHC dated August 14, 2009 and the Project Notification Form submitted on June 24, 2009. We understand that the former St. Mary's Church building(1925) is proposed to be converted to twenty affordable residential apartments for Salem's previously homeless individuals. As we understand, under the current proposal, the exterior of the masonry church building would not be altered with the exception of: (1) The removal of the small wood two-story addition attached to the rear of the church building; (2) The addition of two clear glass windows to the first and third floors; (3) The addition of a 4' elevator override; and (4) The removal of all of the original stained glass windows and the replacement of those windows with new energy efficient windows in the same size and mullion pattern. While the Salem Historical Commission supports restoration, rehabilitation, and reuse of historic buildings to insure their presence for future generations, the position of the Commission is that the church building will very likely be eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places and that the removal of the stained glass windows will have a substantial adverse effect on this prominently located historic property. Page 2 9/9/09 To provide some background on the expansion project, as we understand it, the Salem Mission initially considered construction of an additional floor to the former youth center building, also located on the campus, in order to achieve its twenty residential unit objective. We understand that that concept was then abandoned due to concern over the potential disruption of the Salem Mission's day-to-day activities during the 9 to 12 month construction period. The Salem Historical Commission has had a very short window to review the Salem Mission's current proposal, but over the last few days since we learned the details of the project at our regular meeting on August 19, 2009, Commission members have been able to tour the Salem Mission campus of four buildings, particularly the two buildings in question - the former church building (now used as a thrift shop) and the former youth center(now housing Salem Mission operations). Members have also explored other affordable housing reuse projects of former church buildings. One example is St. Patrick's Church project in Cambridge, MA which received Federal, State and local funding. In this 1992 project, a total of 8 original stained and colored glass windows of various sizes and subject matter were retained. The majority of stained glass windows were removed and replaced with varying clear glass configurations. It is our understanding that the development of the twenty unit affordable housing project would be in the $3.4 million range if construction were to utilize the church building, while a somewhat smaller total expenditure would be required if utilizing the youth center building. Therefore we feel that a more view complete review of the option of using n the g youth th center building vs. the church building is crucial in order to allow consideration of other uses for the church building n that will retain the stained glass windows. g After speaking with a senior construction professional with extensive knowledge in such renovations, we are encouraged that the church building could potentially provide a very satisfactory temporary facility for the Salem Mission's day-to-day activities during the construction period while the youth center building is being expanded. This might include the addition of two bathrooms, a temporary prep-kitchen, and several partitions in the church building. Furthermore, preliminarily inspection of the youth center building indicates that, subject to a formal engineering review, the youth center building appears structurally capable of supporting an additional story. At the same time, the entire existing faFade of the building could be creatively altered to bring the building into harmony with the other buildings on the campus. Under the Salem Mission's current plan, nothing will be done to the exterior of the youth center building, which is a very utilitarian 1950's eyesore. Therefore, we feel that if the Salem Mission were to go back to its original concept to expand upon the youth center building, it could: (1) Enhance the Salem downtown area with the renovation of the youth center building into a handsome new building designed in concert with the church building and the other substantial 1920's brick buildings on the campus. Page 3 9/9/09 (2) Potentially save a considerable amount of construction expense. (3) Retain the current substantial $130,000 annual income stream from the thrift shop operation on the first floor of the church building, while developing a more creative, long-term plan for the reuse of the church building that would allow a less destructive change to the exterior. Thus, more time could be allowed to explore alternative proposals, such as the recent proposal for a performing arts center(which might add an additional element of on-campus cultural exposure for the Salem Mission residents). (4) Receive the support of the community. In conclusion, we wholeheartedly support the Salem Mission and its efforts to reduce homelessness, and we are looking forward to a permanent reuse of the church building. However, we feel removal of the stained glass windows has an adverse effect on the historic fabric of the building. To mitigate this adverse effect, we encourage other alternatives for the development of housing, particularly the original plan of construction above the former youth center. Finally, we encourage creative thinking about the reuse of the church building, and will make ourselves available to assist the Salem Mission with design questions relating to historic appropriateness and any other ways we can help with the success of this project. Yours erely, Je icaHe bert Y Vice Chairman Cc: Mayor Kimberley Driscoll Lynn Duncan, Director of Planning & Community Development Andrew Oliver, Salem Mission Dana Weeder, Winter Street Architects r �0 v a�7 Salem Historical Commission 120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 (978) 745-9595 EXT. 311 FAX (978)740-0404 September 9, 2009 Ryan T. Maciej Preservation Planner Massachusetts Historical Commission 220 Morrissey Boulevard Boston, MA 02125 RE: Phase III, Salem Mission Seeds of Hope Campus, 56 Margin Street, Salem, MA MHC# RC.35744 Dear Mr. Maciej: The Salem Historical Commission is pleased to comment on the Salem Mission's "Seeds of Hope"expansion project proposal in response to Massachusetts Historical Commission's (MHC) letter to Winter Street Architects dated July 24, 2009, Winter Street Architects' letter to MHC dated August 14, 2009 and the Project Notification Form submitted on June 24, 2009. We understand that the former St. Mary's Church building(1925) is proposed to be converted to twenty affordable residential apartments for Salem's previously homeless individuals. As we understand, under the current proposal,the exterior of the masonry church building would not be altered with the exception of: (1) The removal of the small wood two-story addition attached to the rear of the church building; (2) The addition of two clear glass windows to the first and third floors; (3) The addition of a 4' elevator override; and (4) The removal of all of the original stained glass windows and the replacement of those windows with new energy efficient windows in the same size and mullion pattern. While the Salem Historical Commission supports restoration, rehabilitation, and reuse of historic buildings to insure their presence for future generations, the position of the Commission is that the church building will very likely be eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places and that the removal of the stained glass windows will have a substantial adverse effect on this prominently located historic property. r Page 2 9/9/09 To provide some background on the he ex ansion p project, as we understand it, the Salem Mission initially considered construction of an additional floor to the former youth center building, also located on the campus, in order to achieve its twenty residential unit objective. We understand that that concept was then abandoned due to concern over the potential disruption of the Salem Mission's day-to-day activities during the 9 to 12 month construction period. The Salem Historical Commission has had a very short window to review the Salem Mission's current proposal, but over the last few days since we learned the details of the project at our regular meeting on August 19, 2009, Commission members have been able to tour the Salem Mission campus of four buildings, particularly the two buildings in question - the former church building (now used as a thrift shop) and the former youth center(now housing Salem Mission operations). Members have also explored other affordable housing reuse projects of former church buildings. One example is St. Patrick's Church project in Cambridge, MA which received Federal, State and local funding. In this 1992 project, a total of 8 original stained and colored glass windows of various sizes and subject matter were retained. The majority of stained glass windows were removed and replaced with varying clear glass configurations. It is our understanding that the development of the twenty unit affordable housing project would be in the $3.4 million range if construction were to utilize the church building, while a somewhat smaller total expenditure would be required if utilizing the youth center building. Therefore, we feel that a more complete review of the option of using the youth center building vs. the church building is crucial in order to allow consideration of other uses for the church building that will retain the stained glass windows. After speaking with a senior construction professional with extensive knowledge in such renovations, we are encouraged that the church building could potentially provide a very satisfactory temporary facility for the Salem Mission's day-to-day activities during the construction period while the youth center building is being expanded. This might include the addition of two bathrooms, a temporary prep-kitchen, and several partitions in the church building. Furthermore, preliminarily inspection of the youth center building indicates that, subject to a formal engineering review, the youth center building appears structurally capable of supporting an additional story. At the same time, the entire existing fagade of the building could be creatively altered to bring the building into harmony with the other buildings on the campus. Under the Salem Mission's current plan, nothing will be done to the exterior of the youth center building, which is a very utilitarian 1950's eyesore. Therefore, we feel that if the Salem Mission were to go back to its original concept to expand upon the youth center building, it could: (1) Enhance the Salem downtown area with the renovation of the youth center building into a handsome new building designed in concert with the church building and the other substantial 1920's brick buildings on the campus. Page 3 9/9/09 (2) Potentially save a considerable amount of construction expense. (3) Retain the current substantial $130,000 annual income stream from the thrift shop operation on the first floor of the church building, while developing a more creative, long-term plan for the reuse of the church building that would allow a less destructive change to the exterior. Thus, more time could be allowed to explore alternative proposals, such as the recent proposal for a performing arts center(which might add an additional element of on-campus cultural exposure for the Salem Mission residents). (4) Receive the support of the community. In conclusion, we wholeheartedly support the Salem Mission and its efforts to reduce homelessness, and we are looking forward to a permanent reuse of the church building. However, we feel removal of the stained glass windows has an adverse effect on the historic fabric of the building. To mitigate this adverse effect, we encourage other alternatives for the development of housing, particularly the original plan of construction above the former youth center. Finally, we encourage creative thinking about the reuse of the church building, and will make ourselves available to assist the Salem Mission with design questions relating to historic appropriateness and any other ways we can help with the success of this project. Yours erely, Je sicaB Herbert Vice Chairman Cc: Mayor Kimberley Driscoll Lynn Duncan, Director of Planning & Community Development Andrew Oliver, Salem Mission Dana Weeder, Winter Street Architects w WINTER RECEIVED T R STREET ARCHITECTS I SEP 1 8 2009 r`�r'T r� r'L'trrNfiUC& ' U September 16, 2009 E Ryan T. Maciej Preservation Planner Massachusetts Historical Commission 220 Morrissey Boulevard Boston, MA 02125 Cc: JohnTierney-Congressman f Frederick Berry-State Senator John Keenan-State Representative Kim Driscoll-Mayor of Salem Jane Guy-Salem Historical Commission Re: Salem Mission Seeds of Hope III,56 Margin Street,Salem, MA;MHC#RC.35744 Dear Mr.Maciej: We have reviewed the Salem Historic Commission's(SHC) letter to the Massachusetts Historical Commission regarding the Salem Mission's'Seeds of Hope III' project dated September 9th, 2009 and found that while the letter is generally accurate,there are a few items that are either misleading or in error and require further clarification. At the conclusion of the Salem Historical Commission meeting on August 19, 2009,the Salem Historical Commission asked the Salem Mission to respond to two items: 1) The commission asked that the Salem Mission provide a strategy for removing the windows...who and how much? is it a reputable firm? 2) The commission asked for a well reasoned argument for not adding to the Youth Center. The Salem Mission has offered to work with its Ward Councilor and former parishioners to try to locate the families of the donors of the stained glass windows,wall murals and statuary, and has „ offered to return any of these items to the families or to donate them to churches of their 209 Essex. Street Suite 300 Salem, Massachusetts 01970 978.744.7379 - i 1 j WINTER STREET ARCHITECTS f I choice. In addition,an approach has been made to the Peabody Essex Museum in Salem to see if it would be interested in receiving any items that cannot be returned or donated. And finally, the Boston Archdiocese has offered to remove and store the windows and to redistribute them to other churches. The Archdiocese has provided this service for a number of church renovations. The Salem Mission initially hoped that housing could be constructed over the existing Youth Center and asked Winter Street Architects(WSA)to assess feasibility. WSA provided the Salem Mission with an approach that only provided 8-10 apartments on one additional floor and existing zoning laws would not allow the construction of two additional floors. This would reduce the number of shelter beds that the Mission is able to eliminate, resulting in fewer formerly homeless people being housed and more homeless people remaining on the Mission's campus. E` WSA also assessed the structural implications of building over the existing 1950's Youth Center. We spoke to the structural engineer of record for the recent renovation of the Youth Center who confirmed that the building, like many buildings constructed in the 1950's, utilizes un- reinforced masonry construction that cannot support the load of an additional floor. An additional floor could be added if supported by new columns, but this approach is cost H prohibitive for the following reasons: 1) Existing rooftop equipment would have to be removed and re-routed. 2) Existing roof structure would have to be removed in order to accommodate the increased live loads of occupied space. }r 3) Reduced SF in existing building due to a required new elevator. L; 4) Upgrades required forfire suppression equipment,electrical,sewer,water and fire r `4 alarm. 5) Existing structural system may require underpinning in order to accommodate &, foundations for the new structure. 6) Increased costs associated with penetrating existing spaces and coordinating existing and new construction. 7) An additional floor will trigger seismic upgrades to the entire existing building. 4 , 8) Cost of hazardous material removal. 9) An additional floor will trigger energy code compliance for the entire existing structure, i.e. new windows etc. The above speaks to the very real concern to the Mission of the increased costs associated with building over the Youth Center. We received two estimates for the construction cost of building 20 units in the'church site'(as opposed to the 3.4 million project cost cited in the letter from i' Il Y tl WINTER STREET ARCHITECTS the Salem Historical Commission). One estimate came In at 1.94 million and the other came in at 1.99 million. WSA's estimated construction cost for building above the existing Youth Center is about the same, but it only provids half of the units(one floor). The church site is already at the upper end of what the State will fund in terms of development cost per unit,construction cost per square foot and overall public funding requirements. i The Mission has also been advised that funding for the shelter would be transferred along with the residents and this would cause serious funding problems for the Mission,i.e.if there are no residents;there is no funding. If there is no funding, the Mission would have to lay off staff and good staff is key to the work the Mission is doing. And finally,the meals program serves 9,000 meals a month to the entire community. Closing that program would cause hardship to the community. Even more of a concern to the Mission however, is the fact that the center would need to be closed during a good portion of construction. Closing the shelter for a period of time would eliminate the only local emergency shelter services and could substantially increase the number of homeless individuals forced to sleep outside without critical support services. With only three adult shelters in the North Shore area,the Salem Mission operates 34 of the North Shore region's 66 total emergency beds. All three shelters already operate at full capacity and over. The Salem Mission has communicated these facts to the SHC, but the SHC letter to the Massachusetts Historical Commission contains factual errors that need to be addressed/ clarified. a I 1) The letter states that,"a somewhat smaller total expenditure would be required if utilizing the youth center building". This, as stated above, is not the case. WSA i provided the Mission with a conceptual plan for building one additional floor and the cost for that floor(8-10 units)was approximately the same cost as the 20 unit project proposed in the'church site'. Given that the 'church site' proposal is already at the upper end of what the state will fund in terms of development costs per unit,housing above the Youth Center isjust not feasible: 2) The letter further states that,"preliminary inspection of the youth center building indicates that, subject to a formal engineering review,the Youth Center building appears structurally capable of supporting an additional story". This is a dangerous and misleading statement. If a"preliminary inspection"was conducted by the Salem Historic Commission, it was done without the knowledge of the Salem Mission and conducted from the street. To state that the building"appears structurally capable" does not make it so. As stated previously,we have spoken to a structural engineer, ( who, as the engineer of record for a previous renovation,has extensive knowledge of this building. { WINTER STREET ARCHITECTS a 1 3) And finally,when referring to our initial study to build above the Youth Center,the letter states that,"the concept was then abandoned due to concern over the potential disruption of the Salem Mission's day-to-day activities during the 9-12 month construction period". This is an understatement. The building would have to be closed, funding would be suspended and staff laid off. I r The Salem Mission is defined by its noble goal of ending homelessness. It is a well run organization that has proven itself to be a valuable citizen to the City of Salem...a sentiment that is shared by nearly all. Its leadership has demonstrated the organizational skills and capacity required to tackle the challenging problem of homelessness...and they are succeeding. It Is precisely this type of leadership and organization that is required to secure the funding needed to facilitate the preservation of St. Mary's. We believe St. Mary's church is a beautiful structure, it has a quiet street presence,well proportioned massing,and admittedly,beautiful stained glass windows. It is an austere building that has played an important role in Salem's urban fabric since 1925,but it is also a building in need of attention."Historic preservation",in the words of Ada Louise Huxtable, "is not sentimentality but a psychological necessity. We must learn to cherish history and to preserve worthy old buildings...we must learn how to preserve them, not as pathetic museum pieces, but by giving them new uses." The Salem Mission has found a new use for this wonderful building and has put forth the only realistic plan to fund its preservation. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, WinterStr tArchitects, Inc. Dana Weeder AIA LEED AP Principal t, t s 1 S l w Salem Historical Commission 120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 (978) 745-9595 EXT 311 FAX (978) 740-0404 September 9, 2009 Ryan T. Maciej Preservation Planner Massachusetts Historical Commission 220 Morrissey Boulevard Boston, MA 02125 RE: Phase I1I, Salem Mission Seeds of Hope Campus, 56 Margin Street, Salem, MA MHC# RC.35744 Dear Mr. Maciej: The Salem Historical.Commission is pleased to comment on the Salem Mission's "Seeds of Hope"expansion project proposal in response to Massachusetts Historical Commission's (MHC) letter to Winter Street Architects dated July 24, 2009, Winter Street Architects' letter to MHC dated August 14, 2009 and the Project Notification Form submitted on June 24, 2009. We understand that the former St. Mary's Church building(1925) is proposed to be converted to twenty affordable residential apartments for Salem's previously homeless individuals. As we understand, under the current proposal, the exterior of the masonry church building would not be altered with the exception of- (1) The removal of the small wood two-story addition attached to the rear of the church building; (2) The addition of two clear glass windows to the first and third floors; (3) The addition of a 4' elevator override; and (4) The removal of all of the original stained glass windows and the replacement of those windows with new energy efficient windows in the same size and mullion pattern. While the Salem Historical Commission supports restoration, rehabilitation, and reuse of historic buildings to insure their presence for future generations, the position of the Commission is that the church building will very likely be eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places and that the removal of the stained glass windows will have a substantial adverse effect on this prominently located historic property. L 1 I Page 2 9/9/09 To provide some background on the expansion project, as we understand it, the Salem Mission initially considered construction of an additional floor to the former youth center building, also located on the campus, in order to achieve its twenty residential unit objective. We understand that that concept was then abandoned due to concern over the potential disruption of the Salem Mission's day-to-day activities during the 9 to 12 month construction period. The Salem Historical Commission has had a very short window to review the Salem Mission's current proposal, but over the last few days since we learned the details of the project at our regular meeting on August 19, 2009, Commission members have been able to tour the Salem Mission campus of four buildings, particularly the two buildings in question - the former church building (now used as a thrift shop) and the former youth center(now housing Salem Mission operations). Members have also explored other affordable housing reuse projects of former church buildings. One example is St. Patrick's Church project in Cambridge, MA which received Federal, State and local funding. In this 1992 project, a total of 8 original stained and colored glass windows of various sizes and subject matter were retained. The majority of stained glass windows were removed and replaced with varying clear glass configurations. It is our understanding that the development of the twenty unit affordable housing project would be in the $3.4 million range if construction were to utilize the church building, while a somewhat smaller total expenditure would be required if utilizing the youth center building. Therefore, we feel that a more complete review of the option of using the youth center building vs. the church building is crucial in order to allow consideration of other uses for the church building that will retain the stained glass windows. After speaking with a senior construction professional with extensive knowledge in such renovations, we are encouraged that the church building could potentially provide a very satisfactory temporary facility for the Salem Mission's day-to-day activities during the construction period while the youth center building is being expanded. This might include the addition of two bathrooms, a temporary prep-kitchen, and several partitions in the church building. Furthermore, preliminarily inspection of the youth center building indicates that, subject to a formal engineering review, the youth center building appears structurally capable of supporting an additional story. At the same time, the entire existing fagade of the building could be creatively altered to bring the building into harmony with the other buildings on the campus. Under the Salem Mission's current plan, nothing will be done to the exterior of the youth center building, which is a very utilitarian 1950's eyesore. Therefore, we feel that if the Salem Mission were to go back to its original concept to expand upon the youth center building, it could: (1) Enhance the Salem downtown area with the renovation of the youth center building into a handsome new building designed in concert with the church building and the other substantial 1920's brick buildings on the campus. i Page 3 9/9/09 (2) Potentially save a considerable amount of construction expense. (3) Retain the current substantial $130,000 annual income stream from the thrift shop operation on the first floor of the church building, while developing a more creative, long-term plan for the reuse of the church building that would allow a less destructive change to the exterior. Thus, more time could be allowed to explore alternative proposals, such as the recent proposal for a performing arts center(which might add an additional element of on-campus cultural exposure for the Salem Mission residents). (4) Receive the support of the community. In conclusion, we wholeheartedly support the Salem Mission and its efforts to reduce homelessness, and we are looking forward to a permanent reuse of the church building. However, we feel removal of the stained glass windows has an adverse effect on the historic fabric of the building. To mitigate this adverse effect, we encourage other alternatives for the development of housing, particularly the original plan of construction above the former youth center. Finally, we encourage creative thinking about the reuse of the church building, and will make ourselves available to assist the Salem Mission with design questions relating to historic appropriateness and any other ways we can help with the success of this project. Yours erely, � �Je ica Herbert Vice Chairman Cc: Mayor Kimberley Driscoll Lynn Duncan, Director of Planning & Community Development Andrew Oliver, Salem Mission Dana Weeder, Winter Street Architects �G�� r ( V�" �, �'d° �/�� — �y 1 � i � ���� � � ,J �� �„����� a��� �� �, �I �� �_� �' � ���r`�°O��r��� �� �' �� �����pe�- Other Federal Funds State/Local Funds Private Funds Other: 25 characters maximum TOTAL PROGRAM COS REMINDER - PERFORMANCE ME Please see your CDBG Agreement for performan in 2-3 lines of text/statistics. You may fax, mail c 4S 1 J. 1 J miveI JCrecL - 1JCIpar, LLI,—l.brllllCUW U1 t trim - Continuation 4. 47 Washington Square North—Barbara A. Swa Replacement of windows & rear door, replace install one new window 5. Other Business a. Approval of minutes—4/1/09 b. Correspondence c. Roofing guidelines Iii , Pt JUL 2 9 2009 QI-:0 0;:r_nt�r The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William rJetla� a� r� William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Massachusetts Historical Commission July 24,2009 Dana Weeder c/o Winter Street Architects 209 Essex Street Salem, MA 01970 RE: Phase III,Salem Mission Seeds of Hope Campus,56 Margin Street,Salem, MA; MHC# RC.35744 Dear Mr. Weeder: The Massachusetts Historical Commission(MHC)has reviewed the additional information you submitted. received June 25, 2009,concerning the proposed project referenced above. The subject property at 56 Margin Street may be eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places(36 CFR 60). After a review of the information submitted, MHC staff have the following comments. Phase III of the proposed project,consisting of the exterior and interior renovation of the 1925 masonry church for the incorporation of twenty affordable housing units is described in the Project Notification Form that was submitted to this office, received June 25. 2009. At this time,the MHC is unable to determine what effect the proposed project will have on the historic property listed above. The MHC requests the following information. Please provide proposed elevation renderings of the church. Please also describe the circumstances that necessitate the removal of the historic stained glass windows. The MHC looks forward to receiving and reviewing the above requested information. These comments are offered to assist in compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966,as amended(36 CFR 800),and M.G.L.Chapter 9, Section 26-27C,as amended by Chapter 254 of the Acts of 1988(950 CMR 71.00). Please do not hesitate to contact me at this office if you have any questions. Sincerely, Ran T. Maciej Preservation Planner Massachusetts Historical Commission xc: HUD JoAnn McGuirk, HOME MHFA Salem Historical Commission Historic Salem-Inc Preservation Salem 220 Morrissey Boulevard, Boston, Massachusetts 02125 (617) 727-8470 • Fax: (617) 727-5128 www.state.ma.us/sec/mhc t RECEIVED AUG 2 4 2009 OFPT.tX PLA'irfiaia G$ COtt"6 6gd N nE'v-E! OPM NT Rosalie Young 11 Wisteria St. Salem, MA 01970 Salem Historic Commission 120 Washington St. 3rd Floor Salem,MA 01970 August 16, 2009 St.Mary's Italian Church,Salem,Massachusetts Dear Sir/Madam, I understand the Massachusetts Historic Commission and the Salem Historic Commission are involved and considering the future use of St Mary's Church in Salem. As you are no doubt aware, St Mary's holds a unique place in Salem's history and especially within the Italian-American Community.At the tum of the last century, many Italian immigrants(including my family)migrated to Salem and settled there. They helped build Salem's infrastructure and are an integral part of Salem's history. To us, St Mary's is considered the heart of a proud culture and documents our participation in the growth of the City. St Mary's itself holds many key historic artifacts,which should be protected and archived. I specifically refer to the stained glass windows, which frame the Church.Many of the founding members of this community played key roles in Salem's formal history and have windows dedicated to them. The windows have remained a living testament to that history. One of the windows is dedicated to my Grandfather,Santo DeFrancesco.He came to Salem from Sicily in the late 1800's and settled there. He sold flour throughout the North Shore(delivering as far as Gloucester by horse and cart),was a baker and founded Salem's bakery on Gedney St. 1 am aware of the two plans for the building now being discussed. I would appreciate an outline of the Historic Commission's position on the future of the stained glass windows.As they are an important part and treasure to the City, State and US history, I expect the Commission provide a plan to preserve them?I am interested to know the details and welcome your thoughts. Looking forward to hearing from you.Please do not hesitate to contact me further for more details if required. Sincerel X--e�e Rosalie N.Young(nee Oliva) L� , ,A Mtssro� The Salem Mission PO Box 810, 56 Margin Street, Salem, MA 01970 Phone: (978) 744-0500 Fax: (978) 740-3832 www.salemmission.org "sowing seeds of hope" Ms.Jane Guy, Salem Historical Commission Dear Ms. Guy, As requested, I am providing further comment on the matters raised at the last meeting. Building above the existing Mission Centre The Board did consider building an additional floor about the existing Mission Centre. Here are some of the reasons the Board did not proceed with that idea and voted to go ahead and develop apartments in the church: 1) An additional floor could add 8-10 apartments compared with the 20 planned for the church.This would reduce the number of shelter beds we are able to eliminate, resulting in fewer formerly homeless people being housed and more homeless people remaining on our campus. 2) Existing zoning laws would not allow us to build two additional floors. We are advised that building two more floors would be a much more complicated project and that the cost would likely be prohibitive. 3) Since the existing structure cannot support the weight of an additional floor, new columns would be needed to penetrate the existing space. This would require the closing of the existing center during a good portion of construction. 4) Existing structural system may require underpinning in order to accommodate new structure. 5) An additional floor may trigger energy code compliance for the existing structure, i.e. new windows etc. 6) Existing rooftop equipment would have to be removed and re-routed. 7) Reduced SF in existing building due to a required new elevator 8) Upgrade fire suppression equipment 9) Electrical upgrades 10) Sewer upgrades 11) Water upgrades 12) Seismic upgrade to existing building 13) Fire alarm upgrade 14) Cost of hazardous material removal There are other factors that are equally important: s. 1. Closing the shelter for a period of time would necessitate moving the residents to another shelter. We have been advised that funding for the shelter would be transferred along with the residents and this would cause serious funding problems for the Mission. 2. If we lose funding we would have to consider laying off staff. Good staff is key to the work we are doing and Mark Cote has built an outstanding set of men and women who work for us today.The Board would be unlikely to support a plan that caused us to lay off staff. 3. The meals program serves 9,000 meals a month to the entire community. Closing that program would cause hardship to the community. Were the Mission Board to decide to build above the Mission Centre, the future of the church would remain unanswered. In the years we have owned the church we received no approaches from parties interested in buying it until the concept put forward by SCAC. After 4 months we have heard no details of their plans as far as the cost of their project, their funding commitments to date, or plans to raise funds in competition with the YMCA's fundraising for Ames Hall. Stained glass windows For the various reasons mentioned in the letter from Winter Street Architects to the Massachusetts Historical Commission, it is not possible to retain the stained glass windows. The Salem Mission has offered to work with its Ward Councilor and former parishioners to try to locate the families of the donors of the stained glass windows,wall murals and statuary, and has offered to return any of these items to the families or to donate them to churches of their choice. In addition,The Boston Archdiocese has offered to remove and store the windows and to redistribute them to other churches. An approach has been made to the Peabody Essex Museum in Salem to see if it would be interested in receiving any items that cannot be returned or donated. Sincerely, Andrew Oliver, President r ���Hlem 13 d4s i*0r,C% P.O. Box 865 Salem, MA 01970 incorporated Telephone (9 8) 745-0799 September 8, 2009 Ryan J. Maciej Massachuesetts Historical Commission 220 Morrissey Blvd. Boston, MA 02125 RE: St. Mary's Italian Church 106 Review Dear Mr. Maciej: In order to fill our mission of advocating for the preservation of Salem's historic resources, it has long been the policy of Historic Salem, Inc. to monitor and participate in any state or federal review process in Salem involving historic resources. Therefore we make the following comments on the recent Project Notification Form filed with the Massachusetts Historical Commission. These comments are to assist in your review of the project under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (36 CFR 800) and M.G.L. Chapter 9 Section 26-27C, as amended by Chapter 254 of the Acts of 1988 (950 CMR 71.00). St. Mary's Italian Church, said to be modeled after the Church of Santa Chiara in Assisi, Italy, was completed in 1925, and has served at the religious and social center of Salem's Italian community for nearly a century. Its elaborate interior includes significant architectural features including stained glass and ecclesiastical fixtures, as well as paintings completed in 1950 by Professor Mose Franceschi of Florence, Italy. Historic Salem, Inc. has focused on St. Mary's Italian Church since it was nominated to HSI's Most Endangered Historic Properties List in 2003 after being closed by the Archdiocese of Boston. When the Salem Mission purchased St. Mary's in 2004 Historic Salem, Inc. encouraged them to come to an agreement with the Archdiocese that would allow the beautiful stained glass windows to remain in place after the sale. Based upon a positive response and representations by the Mission, the status of the church was upgraded to "Recovering" in 2005. Unfortunately the current plans of the Salem Mission to convert St. Mary's Church to transitional housing will result in severe loss of integrity of the church interior and the removal of the stained glass windows, both of which are significant aspects of the building's historical Fax (978) 744-4356 • Email: info@historicsalem.org - Web: http://www.historicsalem.org s importance. For this reason Historic Salem, Inc. has changed the status of the property on our most Endangered list to the highest priority of"Endangered." We understand that a community group will be preparing a survey form for the church and will be asking MHC to make a determination of eligibility for listing on the National_Register of Historic Places. We support their efforts and expect the property to be eligible for this listing. This National Register eligibility and the Mission's plans to use federal funds in the renovation place qualify this project for review under Section 106 of the National Preservation Act. Under Section 106 of the National Preservation Act, projects with federal financial involvement that will adversely impact historic properties are required to explore alternatives to avoid or reduce harm to these properties. One way adverse impact is defined is a physical destruction or damage to a property; another is a change in the character of the property's use. Both of these impacts will occur under the proposed plan. We believe that the proponent should consider alternatives that will avoid, minimize, or mitigate the adverse impact of the project on historic resources, especially alternatives to removal of the stained glass, as well as proposals for mitigation. Historic Salem, Inc. requests to be an "interested party" in any future 106 review of this project. Thank you for your consideration of our concerns. Please feel free to contact us with any questions. Sincerely, Emily Udy Preservation Project Manager CC: Salem Mission HUD JoAnn McGuirk, HOME MHFA Salem Historical Commission Fax (978) 744-4356 • Email: info(b)historicsalem.org - Web: http://www.historicsalem.org WINTER STREET ARCHITECTS August 14, 2009 Ryan T. Maciej Perservation Planner Massachusetts Historical Commission 220 Morrissey Boulevard Boston, MA 02125 tel: 617-727-8470 fax: 617-727-5128 Cc:Jane Guy Salem Historical Commission 93 Washington Street Salem, MA 01970 Re: Salem Mission Seeds of Hope III, 56 Margin Street, Salem, MA; MHC# RC.35744 Dear Mr. Maciej: Thank you for the response to our submission on June 25, 2009. In response to your comments, I have attached elevations detailing the renovation of the church for the Seeds of Hope III project. In addition, I have attached interior photographs of the stained glass windows which depict a variety of religious scenes and portraits and exterior photographs of the church. The Salem Mission has a long history with the St. Mary's Church. When the Crombie Street Church (the Salem Mission's former parent organization) bought the St. Mary's church in 2004, it spent five months negotiating with the Archdiocese before an agreement was reached to buy the stained glass windows for an additional$30,000. Initially,the Crombie Street Church (renamed the Open Door Church) held services in the building, but in 2007 the church closed and was dissolved. On dissolution,the church became the property of the Salem Mission,which does not have the funds to maintain the building. Signs of deterioration are already starting to appear. When Winter Street Architects suggested in 2008 that the church could be'converted into housing,The Salem Mission's instructions were to design a plan that preserved the exterior of the building. In addition to leaving the exterior intact,The Salem Mission has made a request to the State to be allowed to keep the grotto and the ceiling fresco above the altar. That being said,there are a variety of reasons why the stained glass windows need to be removed from the church. The Massachusetts State Building Code requires an opening in each dwelling unit that is at least 4%of the square footage of the unit for ventilation. As the stained glass windows are installed now,the operable portion is only 3%of the square footage of the 209 Essex Street Suite 306 Sa Iam, Massachusetts :01970 978.744.7379 WINTER STREET ARCHITECTS units. This reduced area requires that a portion of the fixed windows are replaced with operable windows. In addition,the energy performance of the stained glass windows is very low. The renovated building will have new windows with high quality insulated, low-e glazing. The new windows will allow the mechanical systems to run more efficiently and will decrease operating costs and the buildings impact on the environment Another factor that influenced the decision to remove the stained glass windows is the interior environment for the residents. The Massachusetts State Building Code requires that rooms intended for human occupancy be provided with an opening whose square footage is 8%of the net floor area of the room.The stained glass windows are the only windows within the units and would therefore not allow direct sunlight to enter the space. Removing the stained glass will allow direct sunlight to enter both levels of the units and allow an unobstructed view to the outside. Lastly,the public funding avenues that the Salem Mission is pursuing may not allow religious iconography within the buildings that they fund. As you can see in the attached photographs, the scenes depicted on the windows are highly religious in nature and may not be appropriate for a non-denominational building with tenants from a wide variety of backgrounds. The stained glass windows and other religious items will not be destroyed to make way for the housing units. The Salem Mission is working with its Ward Councilor and former parishioners to try to discover the families of the donors of the stained glass windows,wall murals and statuary, and has offered to return any of these items to the families or to donate them to churches of their choice. The Boston Archdiocese has also been contacted to help coordinate the redistribution of the salvaged religious items throughout the Commonwealth and the country. A conversation is also planned with the Peabody Essex Museum in Salem to see if it would be interested in receiving any items that cannot be returned or donated as indicated above. Please do not hesitate to contact either myself(x 132) or Dana Weeder(x 122)with any questions. Thank you. Sincerely, Winter Street Architects, Inc. IKIA Kathryn Giardi Designer 31 c EXISTING SLATE ROOF TO REMAIN, REPAIRED AS REQUIRED(TYP) T.O.Roof 49'-11 1/4" 3 BRICK TO AN REP INTER AS REIQUIREDDTYP71 _ 04 Roof 34'-101/4 z �ry I C 77 EXISTING WINDOW OPENINGS TO REMAIN.], [ A STAINED GIASSTO BEREPIACED j c s� NEW ENERGY EFFICIENT WINDOWS P f 5f'-'= .. w r :r RI 03 Third IF oor EXISaNGWOOD STRU ' TO BE REMOVED - - _ — s — F .1 J) ( }. x 20'-4" r , STAINED WINDOW OPENINGS REPLACED REMAIN �- V. �.' V 02 Second Floof � • a * NEWEERGY EFIIENTS TO BE UNDOWS( w 11'_4° LI t+" NEW ENERGY EFFICIENT WiN00WS .0 K—* 01 First Fl000 /l o° V 4 Drivewa Elevation 4 ftf6 2— ' 5 Seeds of Hope Campus - Phase III Margin Street f 6 } 2 WINTER STREET ARCHITECTS ' Salem,MA 01970 3 NFIPIAN _ T.O.Roof� 49'-111/4" L1 T `.. NEW ELEVATOR '"+,-._ ROOF � � EXISTINGSLATE REM 4IN. PENRiOUSETO REPAIRED AS REQUIRED(YP) MATCHIXISTING 3 BRICK TO BE REPAIRED AND REPOINTED AS REQUIRED ITYP) r�> _ 04 Roof 04 Roof g 34'-10 1/4" L1 _34'-10 1/�4" 1 :fl ., S 4 a„r fEXISTINGONDOWOPENINGSTO d '""` ., REMAIN STAINED NEW SS TOENERGY BE BRIAND REO BE INTED AIREDS �`.�+,, ',"y �.-�z - REPLACED WITH ARYJ ENERGY ANO REPOIMED AS EFFICIENT WINDDWS ITYP) REQUIRED(TYP) - _ 03 Third Floor 03 Third Floor n 20,_4„ V t.- 20' 4„ 1 02 Second Flo__or k 02 Second Floor - NEWWINDOWTO x MATCH WSTING I EXISTING LOWER TO REMAIN 01 First Floor n p„ V 5 Rear Elevation n Rear Elevation 2 4 f 6 2 y r 5 Seeds of Hope Campus - Phase III Margin Street f 5 2 WINTER STREET ARCHITECTS ' Salem,MA 01970 3 KT N RECEIVED AUG 1 j 2009 CO?YSi furl{r'i 0tVELOPIEhor i EXISTING ROSE WINDOWOPEMNGTO - T.O.ROOF 4` REMAIN.STAINED GLASS TO BE REPLACED .49'-111/4" y: T� WITH NEW ENERGY EFFICIENT WINDOW C BRICK TOBEEDAND F,�. �y* es# REPOIMED ASSREQUIRED(IVP) NEW ELEVATOR j _ PENTHOUSE TO MATCH EXISTING 04 Roof Aff-� —I 34'-10 1/4" 1 t EXISTING SLATE ROOF TO f REMAIN,REPAIRED AS 4' REQUIRED(TYP) A RNGW000 STU sTRcTUREroBE i, REMOVED ;: 03 Third Floor 20 4 O NEW ENTRANCE EXISTING DOOR TO - - OPENING IN EXISTING I BE REMOVED ' 02 Second Floor - NEW DOORS AND TRANSOM �� NEWREfAIMNGWALLI i IV- 0 WSTIN 1 �I - Y. s j p,.. E z I 1 I t 01 First Floor n 1 Front Elevation n Front Elevation 2 V f 1 12 y r 5 Seeds of Hope Campus - Phase III Margin Street f Bf 2 WINTER STREET ARCHITECTS ' Salem,MA 01970 3 rtrrrux e EXISTING SLATE ROOF TO REMAIN, REPAIRED AS REQUIRED(IVP) _ T.O.Roof 49'-111/4" �1 a n 04 Roof n 34'-101/4" V ` NEW WINDOW TO `�'FXISTING WINDOW OPENINGS TO REMAIN ° '" x '. `NEW ELEVATOR PEMHDUBE TCH E%IBTING a STAINED GLASS TO BE REPLACED WITH "j - OMATCH EXISTIN I " 1NEW ENERGY EFFICIEMWINDOWS P P z A 4, _ (STINGI.DOOR TO BRICK TO BE REPAIRED AND BE REMOVED REPOINTED AS REQUIRED(TYP) t _ r' a s -.:e I". m t t +, v _ Third Floor 03 T_ _ ,- l 5 ;� '. r ter` r _ .` - `L. ISTINGWINDOWOPENINGSTOREIAAIN I t O2 Second Floor �1 Y,. TAINED TPLACED WIT GLASS O BE RE11 4 EW ENERGY EFFICIENT WINDOWS P ��-r- �-- e7Y'.- i a - - 01 First Floor 0" l l Courtyard Elevation f 6 I 2 r 5 Seeds of Hope Campus - Phase III " Margin Street 16 � 2 WINTER STREET ARCHITECTS ' Salem,MA 01910 3 KEYKIAN WINTER STREET ARCHITECTS s F. CEILING FRESCO ABOVE ALTAR AREA WINTER STREET ARCHITECTS ' \ I o . v. h f F + =1. I f VIEW FROM THE GROTTO s ar 'r ygMµ T x '4 ,Cy✓ i4 „.,fir .r w VIEW FROM THE PARKING LOT VIEW FROM MARGIN STREET y* *PLEASE NOTE PLEXI-GLASS OVER EXISTING STAINED GLASS AT EXTERIOR F r a 44 kf 01 oil41 POP y , Y w YY 4 F ,L av r ,finAt — f S t r , IF , 1pff e# t 11 �l OR ya y,ti r' °t {` EE 1, Y �� ••�'lF4 A. v a g± M * _ ` jam., - y.•' h y t t --. �r t _� J -_ v��r� _s f • .R-��'Y +SNE � 4 � S — y/ dw IV IN IN N - �1� IN _f Af PC Alf cm b Y 4s li fN ere xyx rbgF i 6fu1 tAa t 11w .Sa Xil )AP P ( i r {� tFA Iti i ;a r v�xn 1=i i G2 $1 T A K ') �1.. " Wit Yit q�f li!'a/ A liGjll �����• I'i64 il�.i� ���'����' �'�"� JI k !I 4r-- 1 rY ��?::� 1r.J.� -�'�_ i•tea:. ( � STAINED GLASS WINDOWSLOWER SANCTUAR (FIRST FLOOR) F€e zsz �rl 0 Wo ,, .% '� KIZIt J A v f r4� IM Zol t 2'• ,of i .��* Of Oki ILI _ -or� .5 r V � !►�Y A(�'� ie�LO a A n =x 4 m. %1 �.� !';p ►'� /J yy ^F t h Y +!' ' e - ID r" t,r d! 1 r 1 ' .y y`yt � . `'_ / A ,7 000 A Alk .�� a s 404 "�;y'•� i' { +� �: c �� . t����` , ,fit. �" �"= :t�r• � _ _ ,�� 4AlAM VI i/t .t Ji f � \ �i5 ,e ro -Muir r Zs� } Wo - J LN ♦ a. . �� �; o,l try. . +, s � � fd >✓ i +�-. of '�: + ! + ,�A� �,r,,'.r!' ♦�� r+i .i�`I • �.\ .�1 JAML l i.y. i.'.. ..3 Ila r r s i u; 950 CMR: OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF THE COMMONWEALTH APPENDIX A MASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL COMMISSION 220 MORRISSEY BOULEVARD BOSTON, MASS. 02125 617-727-8470, FAX: 617-727-5128 PROJECT NOTIFICATION FORM Project Name; 4F tP�PF C,f�srlfatl --a N-A-uG_,7ZC Location/Address: S"Co.MkYdC,lx„1 City/Town: c>1YL. CCl . Project Proponent Name: - �akLT ri t SS Lora Address: rSCn fAA'YLC_,l Q n"IT",L-T" City/Town/Zip/Telephone: 21AL =.F'n, (AA- nt9"7C5 `t78 - 7N'f-660o Agency license or finding for the project(list all licenses,permits,approvals,grants or other entitlements being sought from state and federal agencies). Agency Name Tvne of License orfunding_ eci ftC,' 5G s /k CChC kY L YSui PL `Me YA Ne rdtn Mtau Project Description(narrative): Pl,..�.h"`3C-: `�'+"-"E /$'rri-e tiF>Y) 4;;,Pi"t✓'^'a G=_.v 7"fit. IN(=in�.m,}17'/rN . Does the project include demolition? If so, specify nature of demolition and'describe the buildings)which are proposed for demolition. _ - PG...E�4SC-' SE"."+��' Does the project include rehabilitation of any existing buildings?�If so, specify nature of rehabilitation and describe the building(s) which are proposed for rehabilitation. f1'LM'e5E 54L7 A- T,1-rJf SoVPI rn ta7%Y4- 1N Nc',rs1fl'i"?itrs Does the project include new construction?If so,describe(attach plans and elevations if necessary). Su?f1-t:r'% mTAt- lNFs4'zntyfo 5/31/96(Effective 7/1/93)-corrected 950 CMR- 275 950 CMR: OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF THE COMMONWEALTH APPENDIX A (continued) To the best of your knowledge,are any historic or archaeological properties known to exist within the project's area of potential impact? If so,specify. What is thetotal acreage of the project area? Woodland acres Productive Resources; Wetland t"1 acres Agriculture 'n acres Floodplain f7 acres Forestry acres Open space l� '!- acres Mining/Extraction_a acres Developed ,,i1S acres Total Project Acreagey,55 acres What is the acreage of the proposed new construction?. acres What is the present laud use of the project area? _ Q(.f�-f(5t. S&£: ,o--n�ftn-t} S7 svP Pr-t snc�wrn� i.vnrn�.,n�fitara Please attach a copy of the section of the USGS quadrangle map which clearly marks the project location. k't"mi:H-Lt:a This Project Notification.Form has been submitted to the MHC in compliance with 950 CMR 71.00. Signature of Person submitting this form: ale: /l �t �ulaC- Zov°1 Name: 7D,6,WA Address: G City/Town/Zip: .�t�i�1.1..'I�hrC. Telephone: Tt- REGULATORY AUTHORITY 950 CMR 71.00: M.G.L. c. 9, §§ 26-27C as amended by St. 1988, c. 254. 7/1/93 950 CMR- 276 WINTER STREET ARCHITECTS June 24, 2009 MASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL COMMISSION 220 MORRISSEY BOULEVARD BOSTON,MASS 02125 PROJECT NOTIFICATION FORM Seeds of Hope campus—PHASE III "SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION" Agency Name Type of License or funding(specify US Department of Housing and Urban Development HOME Loan Massachusetts Department of Housing Housing Innovation Fund& and Community Development Housing Stabilization Fund MassHousing Affordable Housing Trust Fund & CCRI Grant Project Description(narrative): St. Mary's Church in Salem, MA will be renovated to provide 20 affordable housing units to previously homeless individuals. The 8,660 SF masonry church,constructed in 1925,was closed by the Archdiocese in 2003.The Salem Mission,the present owner, purchased the property in 2004 in order to preserve the structure within the predominantly Italian community in Salem. The building includes a large sanctuary on the Second Floor and a smaller worship space on the First Floor.The renovation will reuse these two floors and add a Third Floor(or'loft level')within the clearstory space above the Second Floor. The studio housing units will range from 180 to 370 SF and will have a variety of layouts ranging from single level to loft style designs. Two of the units will be handicap accessible and the residents will have access to a communal laundry room within the building. In addition to the housing,there will be one office located on the First Floor for the support staff and a community room on the second floor. Two of the three main staircases will be preserved and refurbished to be used as the two means of egress.An elevator will be added to bring the building up to code. The exterior facade will be minimally affected by the renovation. In addition to the brick being repaired and repointed,a new window will be added to the First and Third Floors that will mimic the existing window design(see attached photographs). The original stained glass windows will be removed, however the original openings will be reused and the windows will be replaced with more energy efficient windows which will utilize the existing mullion pattern. In addition,the metal-sided override structure for the elevator will protrude approximately 4'-0"above the parapet on the North fagade(see attached photographs). Although 209 Essex Street Suite 300 Salem, Massachusetts 01970 978.744.7379 WINTER STREET ARCHITECTS the front fagade of the building(East fagade)will remain intact,the main entrance to the building will be relocated to an existing door opening on the South facade. It is the goal of the Salem Mission and Winter Street Architects to preserve the integrity of the church while providing a building that serves the surrounding community. Does the project include demolition If so,specify nature of demolition and describe the building(s) which are proposed for demolition. A wooden structure on the South fagade that was added after the original construction,will be removed to return the church to its original design(see attached photographs). Does the project include rehabilitation of any existing buildings?If so,specify nature of rehabilitation and describe the building(s)which are proposed for rehabilitation The project will rehabilitate an existing church; please see the Project Description above. Does the project include new construction?If so.describe(attach plans and elevations if necessary)_ The only new construction that will be added to the existing structure will house the elevator override, previously described in the Project Description. What is the present land use of the project area? The lot is zoned as R2,Residential Two Family. The lot has multiple buildings within the property lines. Each building is designated as its own condominium. The buildings are used as follows,a 22 unit single room occupancy apartment building, a building providing social services to the residents,and the St. Mary's church(our proposed project).The First Floor of the church is presently a thrift store and the second floor is currently used for storage. NORM. ® AcsEcmaS �� A`�p,EDFROM *.," #56 MARGIN {# RrrEgEurK. $TAFFY a !�[°°°°^°� r^�[[• #20 ENDICOTT 1.B-11 ERSA YENSTEISA FILTER -I FEE CAMEMIDION TO—A'TERE 10CAMENT INE •' '0<""N6:"°`° STREET& �,,.. °^ .,x,°TAII'N.I, AA,,F_RE.a�nw A, �°° -B SEN Ka e.A——1 EYE ACESCIF #7 HIGH STREET gyp`"`�•� n° PIPE E AND PRECTAIN ✓ C.nw ADE •\ ii".::N R'co m°�3.,°.PACE BER A—11 ITAIM I-BER—A •!tt TMw ,I`[[.o; oc`w[.s Salem.M.,,a[Ax,•m ;11, FI 51, BEFBI AN DO IT—..MD.-MENTATELET AND AE+Ao.rzcnasrm LD E "s,w°FBI'TIE BEST INTERPRETATION I' w\�^^^\ RECORD ONNER �� AYES REA""'DIET DR"INS sMIT xAPE-1�"s9 IDIENAT u :r" R. "aco� i mr'z 2 TM[aua wvrcwnoxa au.cx CRT. M[�aA�""=xEASY umm wen-�kvE��LED FROM STICAL ' vssw.u. \\.\ ZOITI WINTER »D.11 w"D ANI AD CATV'BY ,""N SAN arS PDT AI,°.,E^N. '�v, - °[x".,,.",^.,, STREET �s "°""°"°""""`"'�, —BEER� E„f "4\ ARCHITECTS, A,'CAM'. Om of SALEM INC. EE1 PLAYGROUND MHH A 209 Enn9 l rtn[reow[o n wrzn smEo.eairze rs,ixe awAmR ®C PEAECA Alrm MunAhnsetu URI , i Y,�rs.N ,: PREEM HANCOCK Eimk'i, i PER, rrnuAN saaEn ci� IRE_EGt CO g .g E n.xA PA.FAST :! y ASSOCIATES �\ ' CHRISiOPMER C0.UM9V5 S L9`` vgA ^,M„^C�p.. °eE°eaiA aAA.INC. a C� 1JIG� is P A. yr JP tW CMI E.YN,An N 24,033±T AREA DI S. �4 •1 .. 4 d Mee11 PREEN, I 'sLL •� m Is tl RrtltiActs DERA � '.• b �yAt , e^• nh '� .. ..... .. 'gwX 'P"..n�•S' �\ 2� Conmlmn¢ vv �:• ��p�pp� •.V+mnnuIDiARfANTNO TED,�1 w¢ENE,nsiu ^cmirtamo AM YA S'G.99 + Y?.1 REALLY iRVST REA m SRI AT mmED MY MARGIN SET TRE .\ �• ;e "�__ v —1 A,AAAAr y vv.r.w max DEEP BEST NAN AMID w� a NOT, rer ELEVATIOIFN BENCH MARKS N(j CO DfrKAS ♦ PAiuu . PLAN OF LAPD . v.m OF m. cRi rox ry — o —rv.~wo.om,ro _ E..AN.e1 wwRe•ip I'll SALBMA : EYE ,A, wwm,.w AREA 1.11 EASE ME AS fl85> heet _ � ei gY a 9 Main Envy Foyer n i s 3a .', g MECN 6 ]B SF Studio SF Studio j, 2]450 6' OFFICE b c Swdio 129 SF O25]50 O O O Bath r "I 3 estibule 43•h Y`.e' O O O O O O i CH 42 BE 0 4 < 3 2 42 SF 1 S di. Studio Studio 2;7$F 273 SF 25550 ....... I o 1 Studio 5 Studio '2]t sF NEWWINDOW EMR O Ededor Courtyard f � FIRST LEVEL 118"=1'-0" 0' 4' 8' 16' 32' Seeds of Hope Campus - Phase III Margin Street WINTER STREET ARcHITEGT.-S Salem'MA 01970 24 June 2009 heel a e � 1t 9 UP ❑ UP ❑ ❑ UP ❑ UP 19 Z Swtlio 8 183 SF BE N ,I elo J� o 0 5 16 17 18 -- 20 swab swdio Swab - SUNm 2 SF 2445E 2445E 244 SF ` Rotal) ohs (iolaq I (Fobil (Fntap ❑ L .a` -A ❑ O O O O O O O O Community Room ' rn UP O OO O 01 O O 3 12. 11. 10 ❑:� S dio Studio Studio Sotlb 2 S - 244 SF 244SF - 244 SF ..O.i ow) - (rel (row) 0md1 _ -77 :.. 14 O it-_- r-_- It no 217 SFStud0 UP UP UP UP ❑ r?* Studio 232 SF O o. U2rbr CourryaN SECOND LEVEL 118"=1'-0.. 0' 4' 8 16' 32' Seeds of Hope Campus - Phase III Margin Street WINTER STREET Arr-wTL-..G'7S Salem,MA 01970 24 June 2009 e f heel TRW8. e _ $ OPENTO OPEN TO OPEN TO OPEN TO OPENTO ¢a BELOW BELOW BELOW BELOW BELOW OPENTO 16„ 17. ' R7 _781£7 / BELOW ^Loft ' i .r`-LoR Laft Loft t f�Y- ALP `13, 1. 12 Q., t 1 `' jj '10 4' V ON + ON LaR LOR s ON t{tI;}Loft ON h a oft _ ........... OPENTO OPENTO OPEN TO OPENTO BELOW BELOW BELOW BELOW —� ... Roof Bdaw NALF FEIC rr WALL ',,.. NEW WINDOW New RoN RwfBelow THIRD FLOOR N 118"=1'-0" 0' 4' 8' 16' 32' Seeds of Hope Campus - Phase III - Marg'inStreet WINTER STREET ARCHITECTSSalem,MA 01970 24 June 2009 _ ff Y y� 6 04 Roof Plan 34'-10 1/4" o i Loft Loft _._. - ' 03 Third Floo 20'-4„ It SWdi 15 5dia11 g 02 Second Flo. Cortidor — � S dio6 Studio4 _ 7 01 First Flo. 0. Seeds of Hope Campus - Phase III SECTION Margin Street 1/8"=1'-0" WINTER STREET Apar—HrrEC"1"fes Salem,FAA,01970 24 June 2009 � 1111 la h `a �" n � % _.t-a,� _ ��- " � -?'•,� '� ' � �--a�, ' s r¢�+fid � j PF, IIr. �s�, ^ 'R� 9YiM h rcc� 4� e,1 pq{REQ m _ �µu C L 4- �� EAST SIDE VIEW E i r. r NORTH SIDE VIEW FROM MARGIN STREET /REAR VIEW a "9s � zx TM� is ,., VSOUTH SIDE VIEW a� i it 4 � tzii � i : n - �yy r c t t, li jg i + ll �� s.�`"f`73 'may„ +'•— e1�. ,�' -N � �{,�f�. �� uniik! nm � ��r!lp1!!!i iP=�A4 €: c f 7 �� Y .bend aA IT 1 ' r SOUTH SIDE VIEW FROM MARGIN STREET 15, 9 D.A, Y VNORTH SIDE VIEW fl ri August 19, 2009 Salem Historical Commission Salem, Massachusetts Dear Members of the Commission, As residents of Salem and strong advocates of preserving the historic fabric of the city, we strongly support the varied efforts to create a Community Arts Center in the former St. Mary's Italian Church and, in particular, want to advocate for the preservation of the very important and historic stained glass windows and mural decorations. The desire to create additional housing for the neediest members of the community is an admirable goal, but this can, in our opinion, be easily achieved elsewhere and should not be done at that location, thereby destroying the artistic integrity of an important building closely tied to the cultural history of Salem. Looking back at the history of preservation in Salem, one can easily recall the many historic structures that have been lost, not through fire or storm, but because of the wrong decision made by people supposedly representing the best interests of the public. You are now in a similar position, so I hope you will vote and work toward preserving the artistic integrity of St. Mary's Church. Sincerely Dean & Elizabeth Lahikainen 26 Pickman Road Salem, MA One church, two visions: Salem Mission, arts group debate future of St.. Mary's By Lisa Guerriero/salem@cnc.com Salem Gazette Fri May 15, 2009, 10:01 AM EDT Wicked Local Photo by Ian Hurley Italian artists painted these murals on the ceiling of St. j}« Mary's sanctuary during the 1950s.The Salem Mission, which now owns the property,plans to transform the church into 20 affordable studio apartments. Salem-The Salem Mission is ready to move forward with building 20 new units of housing in the former St. Mary's Church, but a local group has other ideas for the property. Earlier this month representatives from the Mission — a nonprofit organization devoted to providing emergency and affordable housing — met with residents to discuss their plans for St. ' Mary's. St. Mary's has been closed since 2003, after the Archdiocese of Boston sold it. It now belongs to •, ,,,. q+�: the Salem Mission, which intends to create 20 a{y °��� �tt�Vg1•`�h studio apartments inside the church to add to their Seeds of Hope Campus. A group of artists and neighbors, however, are pitching a project that would create an arts center in the former church. Supporters of the idea say it's a win-win — or more accurately, a win-win- win. They say they can team with the Salem Mission to help find alternative space for housing, - while preserving a beloved community landmark FLEW and fostering local arts and business. "Imagine having that facility (the arts center) next to you, and everything connected to it involves a promotion for the Mission;"said Joe Cultrera, a local filmmaker who's part of the effort to create a Salem Community Arts Center. He envisions the center as a champion of the Mission and a partner in its efforts. Mark Cote,the Salem Mission's executive director, said the Board of Directors has been considering the arts center proposal since the group presented it formally on Wednesday night. "We're open to pursuing an arts center,whether it's in the church or not,"Cote said, but he emphasized that the board's goal remains to establish more affordable housing in Salem. The Mission's leaders have been clear:They are set on constructing 20 new apartments. Although a groundbreaking is still a ways off, they are ready to start the process and anticipate state funding for the housing. "Our focus, clearly, is developing housing and ending homelessness," Cote said. Page 2 of 2 While the fagade of the church would remain the same with the Mission's expansion, much of the interior of St. Mary's would need to be transformed to accommodate the apartments. The project is expected to cost several million dollars to build. The Mission currently offers 22 permanent housing units similar to the ones they're hoping to build, and also operates a 34-bed shelter (which has an overflow capacity of 52 in the winter). The more long-term housing available in the area, representatives of the Mission say, the sooner they'll be able to close the emergency shelter. The idea of converting St. Mary's into housing has been rumored for years, and when the Mission presented the idea at a public meeting two weeks ago, it didn't sit well with some residents. Among the concerned parties are some longtime neighbors concerned with losing what's left of a church that was the centerpiece of the Italian community for generations. "It's a very emotional thing," Cote acknowledged, adding, "the footprint of the church and the outside of the church will not change." Cultrera said the arts center plan would preserve the elaborate stained-glass windows, murals and architectural details that adorn the Catholic church. Building an arts center would create a venue for music, theater, film and fine arts, according to the proposal for the Salem Community Arts Center. The upstairs would be home for performances — there are several dramatic groups that need a permanent home, for example — and the downstairs might be used for gallery space and classes and workshops. While organizers sees their proposed Salem Community Arts Center as a cultural and economic boost for Salem's downtown, they consider the Salem Mission as an important part of the picture. Cultrera said the center and its members would collaborate with the Mission's efforts, working to promote the organization and also expose its residents to the arts. Moreover, Cultrera said, creating a center would preserve the church and keep the downtown diverse — which he views as fundamental to how the public perceives the Mission. "In a bigger sense, I think it saves the neighborhood," he said. If the Mission accepts their proposal, the newly created group that's driving the Salem Community Arts Center would work to identify alternative locations for 20 affordable housing units. The arts-center supporters say they would like to buy the church, and help the Mission use those funds, as well as state money, to purchase existing housing units around the city. With the Mission's Board of Directors resolved to build, supporters of the Salem Community Arts Center need to come up with a specific plan, and quickly. "For the board (of the Salem Mission)to consider it a serious proposal ... they will have to demonstrate an abilityto alter their plans to fit the criteria,"Cote said. The arts-center supporters organized an elaborate proposal in a short time, after the Mission's announcement two weeks ago. But they will need to show proof they can provide a feasible alternative to the Mission's plan for St. Mary's, and that they can back it up with funding. Copyright 2006-2007 GateHouse Media, Inc. Some Rights Reserved. http://www.wickedlocal.com/salem/news/xl 549041049/One-chu rch-two-visions-Salem-Mission-arts- group-debate-future-of-St-Marys i r ,r ile Sabm-l' *News Burr ru;��n ' r •r _ online k romrl nh =" Our View: Arts center a good option for former church May 05, 2009 05:10 am The Salem Mission ought to give Joe Cultrera, a filmmaker and neighbor, along with others in the city's cultural community, a reasonable chance to show they can come up with the cash and programming to turn the former St. Mary's Italian Church into a viable arts center. Their plan represents the only realistic proposal for preserving the ornate interior of the church—which was the center of life for Salem's Italian-American community—from its construction in 1925 until its sale by the Boston Archdiocese five years ago. It's hard to fault the Salem Mission, which operates a much-needed homeless shelter on the property, for wanting to expand its programming to include 20 studio apartments that would be created by subdividing the upper and lower church sanctuaries. They see providing such housing as a means of achieving their goal of eliminating the need for a temporary shelter entirely—and preserving the exterior of the church (which even before the sale had lost its elegant side campanile to the ravages of time and the weather). But Cultrera, producer of well-received documentary films about the clerical abuse scandal, Salem's Haunted Happenings and Peabody's leather industry, who's back living in his old neighborhood, believes he can marshal the resources to convert the church into an arts center—using the lower floor for rotating exhibits and the upper sanctuary with its murals and stained-glass windows for performances by the Salem Theatre Company and similar groups. He at least deserves the chance to try. Following a meeting with neighbors including Cultrera Sunday night, Andrew Oliver, president of the Salem Mission board, expressed a willingness, albeit a very reluctant one, to listen to other proposals. On the other hand he has made it clear that while more housing wasn't their first choice for the church, they feel such a project is entirely in keeping with their obligation to both help the less fortunate and maintain the property. The truth is, however, that the kind of housing proposed for the church could be located elsewhere in downtown Salem. But the church interior, once gutted, will never be replaced. The Mission, under the leadership of Oliver and executive director Mark Cote, has worked had to be a responsible neighbor. And get defensive when others complain about having a shelter in their midst. How better, however, to address the fears and anger such a facility can breed than by creating an arts center which, by its very nature, would encourage people to visit and feel comfortable being there? This could have benefits for all involved and is certainly worth trying. If it doesn't work, the Mission is by all means entitled to turn the former church into housing. Copyright© 1999-2008 cnhi, inc. http://www.salem news.com/puo pin is n/local_story_124231549.htm I?keyword=topstory f bost®n.Cot" OF "i � X7.10 of '� SALEM Artists see home in church Shelter has other plans for St. Mary's By Steven Rosenberg, Globe Staff I May 24, 2009 In downtown Salem, advocates for the homeless and artists are squaring off in a passionate debate over a building each group believes is central to the city's future. The Salem Mission, which runs a homeless shelter and meal kitchen and offers subsidized housing in apartment buildings next to the former St. Mary's Italian Church, has given a fledgling Salem arts group a month to raise at least$500,000 to enter negotiations to buy the former church. In 2003, the Archdiocese of Boston cited a shortage of priests and closed St. Mary's. A year later, the Salem Mission purchased the church and three other buildings on the block for$2 million. Since then, the mission has expanded its complex, housing 34 men and women each night in its shelter, and spending $2.5 million to build 22 single-occupancy units for the formerly homeless. For the last several years, there's been an uneasy coexistence between the shelter and the neighborhood. Most former parishioners are still bitter about the church's closing and don't believe its old recreation center should be used for a shelter. The tension was exacerbated earlier this month when the Salem Mission unveiled plans to spend $3 million to convert the former St. Mary's into a 20-unit apartment building. After a contentious meeting between the mission and its neighbors, local filmmaker Joe Cultrera asked the shelter to consider transforming the former church into a performing arts center instead. As part of Cultrera's plan, the homeless would be offered administrative and maintenance work there. "This center for the arts can become its own community: a place where ideas, art, culture, performance, education, neighborhood and social service converge,"said Cultrera, who grew up on Prescott Street, a couple of blocks from St. Mary's. Cultrera said its sanctuary, made of marble and wood, along with stained-glass windows, pews, and handpainted frescoes, defines the building as a work of art. Several city councilors and the Salem Chamber of Commerce have endorsed Cultrera's plan. Mayor Kim Driscoll called both proposals worthy, and said the city could use more housing for the homeless along with a performing arts center. With no central arts space, theatrical groups and artists now rent various venues around the city. Already, several arts organizations have pledged to rent space in the proposed center. "The location is ideal," said Dominick Pangallo, president of the Salem Theatre Company. Pangallo said his troupe could use the proposed center as a home stage and could expand its performance schedule. "Churches make fantastic performance spaces. The space itself is a work of art. It's not just an empty box. It has a real connection to the community and it's sacred," he said. While shelter administrators say they're willing to consider the idea of an arts center, they're still moving ahead with their plans to build the 20 apartments at the old church. "What we want to do is to continue to develop housing and close the shelter. Inevitably that's the goal," said Mark Cote, the Salem Mission's executive director. Cote said the 20 apartments could be filled by people in the homeless shelter as long as they were sober, worked, and paid 30 percent of their income for rent. The apartment project would be paid for by state subsidies, Cote said, and the Salem Mission is planning to submit all of its grant applications by June 30. The state has already allocated $7,500 for a building design analysis, he said. Andrew Oliver, president of the Salem Mission's board of directors, said he was "extremely impressed" with Cultrera's idea but was noncommittal on any terms of a possible agreement. He said several obstacles were in the way of any potential deal. Because the Salem Mission already owns the church, it does not need city permits to use the building for housing. Buying and developing housing on another property, however, would require city approval, and could take much longer than the one-year construction timetable to build at the church, Oliver said. Also, locating the apartments away from the mission's facility would require additional staff as well as other costs, he said. "For us to go somewhere else we would have much higher operating expenses," he said. "It's a much more difficult thing to achieve." ■ ©Copyright 2009 The New York Times Company littp://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2009/05/24/artists see home in church/ . t l Salem Historic Commission Chair; Hannah Diozzi 20 Washington Street Salem, MA 01970 Dear Ms. Diozzi, Unfortunately I am unable to attend tonight's meeting, but I want to express my appreciation for the Commission willingness to discuss the impact of the potential conversion of St. Mary's Church into housing. Please understand it's not that I'm against housing or the work of the Seeds of Hope, but I'm very much in support of the preservation of the significant historical value and importance of the church and especially the existing windows and paintings that are a part of the church. Once already, the Catholic Church choose to ignore the community and they sold the property with complete disregard for the community members who paid, built and rightfully owned the property. As Councilor Sargent stated in the recent Council meeting on the topic, "they had the legal right to sell the property, but it was morally wrong. While this is the first "sin" committed by the Catholic Church, the second was that the funds from the sale of the property were used to pay for the "sins" of the priest sex abuse scandal. Now there is an opportunity to prevent a third "sin", the removal and destruction of the windows and paintings. I strongly urge the Commission to better understand the true historical value of this building and the importance it has to the community. Sin re , w Caruso 4 Pershing Road Salem, MA 01970 ' al ju e S emtl 11�T( !Vlinc�' Letter: Mission welcomes public dialogue July 29, 2009 12:07 am To the editor: Regarding the recent letter from former Mayor Anthony Salvo concerning the Salem Mission ("Shelter shouldn't be forced on people," Wednesday, July 15): First of all, we have no plans to use the former St. Mary's Church for shelter beds. We made that clear in 2004 when we bought the property, and it remains true today. Our plans are to maintain the exterior of the building and convert the inside to 20 apartments. We have also undertaken to maintain the grotto and any internal features that the state allows us to keep. The new tenants of the apartments will be people who were homeless, but once they move in, sign a lease and pay rent—which they all will do—they are no longer homeless people. Many people are unemployed at some point and then find work, but they are no longer referred to as "formerly unemployed" people. Thus our tenants should be regarded as the contributing members of our community they seek to be, rather than forever being referred to as "formerly homeless." Secondly, the assumption that anybody who drinks publicly is homeless and, by extension,the responsibility of the Mission, is not factual. A guest of the Mission must be sober and drug-free. The underlying philosophy of the Mission is to help people get back on their feet by providing them with the support services they need. Anybody who stays at the Mission has to undertake to attend programs designed individually to achieve that goal. Working toward those goals is a condition of staying in the shelter. Thirdly, shelters are not the solution to homelessness; the solution to homelessness is the provision of housing with supportive services on site. This last point is key. In the early days of the Salem Task Force on Homelessness, one of its members, who had no connection with the Mission, explained that the reason Salem has a homeless problem was that it was the location of the Essex County court system, had a train station and a hospital, and had a tourist industry. The Salem Mission was established to deal with an existing problem in Salem; it did not create the problem. The Salem Mission is committed to reducing and eventually eliminating its shelter. Upon completion of the apartments, we will reduce the number of shelter beds. Thus our plans will lead directly to a reduction in the number of homeless people on our campus. Finally, there appears to be a misunderstanding about the way the Mission is funded. Our total budget is around $1 million and we fund that equally from the public and private sectors. Most of our public funding comes from federal and state sources. The only funds we receive from the City of Salem are part of its Community Development Block Grant funds. These are funds that are allocated to Salem by the federal government and do not form part of Salem's annual budget. In the last fiscal year, Salem received just over $1.1 million in CDBG funds, of which the Salem Mission received $17,200. The Mission does, however, receive the active support of many elected officials and city employees and this we greatly appreciate. The Salem Mission purchased the St. Mary's building from the archdiocese in 2004. We have stated that we will entertain an offer from the arts group to purchase the building, and we intend to honor our commitment to consider seriously any offer made in line with the terms outlined in our letter to Mr. Cultrera in May. In a meeting with representatives of the arts group, we went through line by line what the monetary value was of each of the criteria we outlined. Recently, we were invited by Mr. Cultrera to participate in a panel discussion about the future use of the church. We are very keen to join in such a discussion, as we believe it can only lead to a better understanding of the work we are doing. Before we join such a discussion, the Mission board plans to view Mr. Cultrera's documentary on the church in order to gain a better understanding of its significance within the community. In like manner, we have invited members of the panel, including former Mayor Salvo, to visit the Mission and be given a tour of our facility and a description of the work we are doing. With both groups better informed, we believe a panel discussion, moderated by an independent person, can only be beneficial to all concerned. Those who accept our offer of a tour invariably express their amazement at the work we do. It is that work that has enabled us, in the last year alone, to move 70 individuals out of homelessness and into permanent housing. Finally, the Mission has already moved ahead with the commitments made at the City Council meeting in June. We have elected Seth Doolin, a resident of Prescott Street, to the board, and anticipate that the new neighborhood committee, set up to work through any and all issues relating to our operations, will start meeting in August. Through all these initiatives, we seek to continue to work with our neighbors as we also strive to improve the lives of those in our midst whose need is the greatest. Andrew Oliver President, Salem Mission Salem Copyright© 1999-2008 cnhi, inc. w OV MINsro� The Salem Mission ® �s PO Box 810, 56 Margin Street, Salem, MA 01970 Phone: (978) 744-0500 Fax: (978) 740-3832 www.salemmission.org "sowing seeds of hope" May 15, 2009 Mr. Joseph Cultrera, Zingerplatz Pictures, 57 Wharf Street, Suite 3F, Salem, MA 01970 Dear Joe, Thank you for meeting with us on Wednesday evening. All of us were extremely impressed with the obvious commitment you demonstrated to the proposal you made, and with your willingness to so creatively involve the needs and concerns of the homeless in your own project vision. Following your presentation, the Board discussed the two alternatives before us: formally shelving our own plans in favor of actively pursuing the vision you presented, or, as promised, giving you a thirty day window to present a proposal acceptable to the Board to purchase the St. Mary's building. Due to the advanced state of our planning, our core commitment to housing issues and the delays to finding a replacement building that would result from selling St. Mary's, the substantial time and money we have already invested in our own plan for St. Mary's, the significant benefits of being able to work with an adjacent property, and the very substantial risk that funding would not be available by the time we might find a replacement property, we decided that the first option was not an appropriate one for the Board to approve. In describing the second alternative, you will also notice that we used the word "purchase" St. Mary's, rather than rent. There are several reasons for this, including the fact that we would need the full value of a sale, as compared to an ongoing income stream of rent, offset by maintenance costs, to buy a replacement building. The last point that we would like to make before giving you the parameters within which we would consider a proposal to purchase St. Mary's relates to its value. In arriving at a value, we took a variety of important criteria into account that reflect what the Board would need to realize from a sale in order to allow the Mission to proceed with its original plans. Those criteria include the following: 1. The allocated and appraised value for the St. Mary's when we purchased the combined properties from the Archdiocese was $500,000. 2. We have been carrying debt on the building since purchase 3. The Mission has paid for five years of upkeep (utilities, repairs, insurance, interest on debt, etc.) since the initial purchase. 4. The St. Mary's building is directly adjacent to our existing operations, which has enormous benefits to our supportive programs 5. We have incurred significant costs for our project to date that would be wasted, as well as significant time staff and board time. 6. Beginning to search for a suitable building to house the same number of housing units would take an indeterminate amount of time, take an indeterminate amount of money, face an indeterminate number of zoning and other issues, and in any event delay our being able to achieve our own goals for an indeterminate amount of time. With all of the above by way of prelude, here are the parameters of a proposal that the Board could entertain, if presented in writing and with appropriate supporting materials by not later than 5:00 PM on June 15. It would need to include: 1. A binding, unconditional, non-rescindable cash at close offer to purchase the St. Mary's building, "as is," on or before August 15, 2009 for a price and on terms otherwise reasonably acceptable to the Mission. 2. The offer must be supported by a similarly binding, non-rescindable commitment from a credible funding source (e.g., a bank, foundation or high net worth individual willing to share personal financial information with the Board on a confidential basis) to make available the full purchase amount at closing. 3. The name of the legal entity that would take title to the building 4. The proposed timeline for renovating and opening the new arts center. 5. So that we can assess the viability of completing the construction work and operating the arts center on an ongoing basis, a description of the following: - An updated, as necessary, description of the intended uses of the building -A summary of the intended renovations and the work needed to bring the building into Building Code compliance for the intended use -An estimate of the total conversion costs, and the expected sources of the funding -An estimate of the ongoing operating costs of the arts center, and the expected sources of funding We will, of course, be willing to make the building accessible at a reasonable time to any consultants that you may wish to have inspect the building in connection with preparing a proposal. We realize that this is a great deal to accomplish in the unfortunately short period of time that we can afford to offer, given our own need to apply for funding by not later than June 30. If you decide to present a proposal by June 15 that meets all of the requirements of the first three requirements and k supplies the information requested in the remainder of the list above, we will commit to give the proposal serious consideration. We would appreciate your letting us know, after taking time to discuss this letter, whether you do or do not intend to work towards presenting a proposal within the parameters described above. Please note that this letter is only intended to present the business points needed for the Board to consider a proposal and does not constitute an offer or create any binding legal obligations. May I also conclude this letter by reiterating how much the Board appreciates the positive comments you have all made about the Mission's work during this process. Whatever the outcome of the specific discussion about St. Mary's, the Board of the Mission looks forward to a continuing dialogue with all of you as part of our shared goal of improving the city of Salem for all its residents. Sincerely, t Andrew Oliver President i i� AiT4, e Salem-�/ onlNe�wsk --- ine •.,,?��rumzbr __ Shelter: Windows need to go By Tom Dalton Staff writer !August 24, 2009 12:36 am SALEM—The Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Boston drove a hard bargain in 2004. It was negotiating the sale of the closed St. Mary's Italian Church property with the former Crombie Street United Church of Christ, the operator of the city's homeless shelter. After agreeing to sell the church, youth center and two small apartment buildings for$2 million, the archdiocese raised the price when it learned the charity wanted to keep the stained-glass windows inside the 1925 church built by the city's Italian immigrants. Knowing how important those windows were to the city's Italian community, which had already seen its parish close, and planning at the time to use the building as a church, the charity reached deep into its pocket for another$30,000. "They squeezed us," Andrew Oliver, the head of the charity, said at a public meeting this week. Five years later, the tables have turned. The Salem Mission, as the charity is now known, finds itself in the ironic position of seeking to remove the stained-glass windows in order to fulfill its mission. It no longer uses the building as a church, and its goal has changed from sheltering the homeless to placing them in permanent housing. Today, it wants to convert the church into 20 studio apartments for the homeless, but to do so it says it must remove the stained-glass windows it once went out of its way to save. That plan has stirred strong opposition from several former church members, a neighborhood organization, a group that wants to use the church as an arts center, a few city councilors and a former mayor, all of whom turned out this week for a meeting of the Historical Commission. The city board has no say over the Salem Mission's housing plans, but it has been asked by the Massachusetts Historical Commission to comment. Specifically, the state wants to know how the renovation plans impact the historical integrity of the church building. For some, the issue has boiled down to the windows. "This is their history ..." Joe Cultrera, the head of the arts group and a neighbor, said at the meeting. "This is what is left of their history. ... Take those windows out and its gone." "We lost our church," said Anna Della Monica, the former church organist. "Must we lose our art?" Oliver, the head of the Mission board, told the Historical Commission that they "love the windows" but have to remove them for the church renovation, which will preserve and stabilize a building that is slowly deteriorating. In a letter to the state, the project architect said the windows have to go for a "variety of reasons." The stained-glass windows don't comply with the state building code, are not energy-efficient and "would ... not allow direct sunlight" into the apartments. "Lastly, the public funding avenues that the Salem Mission is pursuing may not allow religious iconography within the buildings that they fund," Winter Street Architects of Salem wrote in a letter to the Massachusetts Historical Commission. With the exception of the windows, the letter noted, the Salem Mission plans to preserve the exterior of the church, even retaining some religious elements: altar paintings by an Italian artist and an outdoor grotto. The Historical Commission plans to spend the next two weeks researching the issue, and possibly asking the state if an exception can be made, allowing the stained-glass windows to stay, according to Vice Chairwoman Jessica Herbert. "They are absolutely gorgeous ... absolutely stunning," she said of the windows. The matter was continued to the board's Sept. 2 meeting. Copyright © 1999-2008 cnhi, inc. Photos R t The Salem Mission may have to removed the stained-glass window's from the former St. Mary's Church. Courtesy photo ART WITH A MISSION The Salem Community Arts Center at St Mary's Italian Church BUILDING A NEW COMMUNITY A presentation to the Board of the Salem Mission May 13,2009 r `T P f`A _ ice"•` �.�.w !"�.. ;Aim M UP Table of Contents Introduction—Art With a Mission 3 We are 3 Our proposition 4 Perfect neighbors 5 Advertising and outreach—a constant, viral pitch 5 Neighborhood relations—perceptions and realities 6 Integration versus segregation 7 Choices 8 Models 9 Acquisition and renovation funding 12 Governance model 13 Summary 13 Referenced documents Copy of Petition 14 Petition Signatory Comments 15 Attachments to this proposal The Transformation of Real Estate Capital into Social Capital Arts & Economic Prosperity 111 ©Zingerplatz Pictures,Inc. 2 e d Introduction—Art With a Mission This is a proposal about re-growth and the creation of a brand new community—a healthy community where people are concerned about each other, respect each other's goals, and work in unison. The members of our group have supported the Salem Mission as individuals and within their respective groups. They have done so not only in spirit, but also in very tangible ways—by participating in fundraisers, by giving grants to the Mission, and by proposals that would aid in future fundraising and visibility efforts.We want to work jointly with the Mission and its board towards what we believe to be mutually beneficial goals. We see this as collaboration, created in a fiscally responsible manner that takes into account the best interests of all stakeholders:The Salem Mission; clients of the Mission; the neighborhood the Mission exists in;the people who funded and built St Mary's Italian Church;the local arts community; and the City of Salem. The following is a proposal developed by members representing several arts,theatre and business organizations in the City of Salem towards the development of the former St Mary's Italian Church into a Salem Community Arts Center(SCAC). With only a week to organize we have allied several factions of the community and created the following document that should be considered as the foundation of an ever-evolving mission statement. It is impossible for us to present exact facts and figures in the short time frame we have been given, but we want these ideas and possibilities to entice the Salem Mission's Board enough to allow us a larger window of opportunity to create a feasibility study and business plan. It is also impossible for us to give a current model of a project like we are talking about—because this project is a chance to be part of a groundbreaking new model—but we will give you some examples of community arts centers that have had palpable effects on their communities. We are The organizers and supporters of SCAC include officers and board members from several Salem arts organizations—Salem Theatre Company, Salem Arts Association, Salem Sounds, Salem Film Fest, CinemaSalem, Experimental Art Galley,A3D, and Art Throb among them. Collectively these groups account for thousands of supportive audience patrons, members, associates, and financial contributors. The Executive Director of the Chamber of Commerce is among our organizers. City Councilors Joan Lovely, Bob McCarthy, Joe O'Keefe, Jean Pelletier, Steven Pinto, Paul Prevey,Arthur Sargent, and Matt Veno have pledged their support. State Representative Keenan has urged the Mission's Board to give this proposal serious consideration. Over a hundred citizens have signed a petition in support of this concept of a unified Mission/Arts Center over the last several days (the petition and the signatories'comments are attached). We have met with neighborhood members and St Mary's Church contributors who are unanimously behind this proposal. ©Zingerplatz Pictures,Inc. 3 Pee Our proposition When St Mary's Italian Church closed in 2003 there was a feeling of helplessness and anger in the neighborhood where it stands.Today, the building is at a turning point.This is a moment in time when all of us can step back from our singular visions of what that building was,what it is, and what it could be. It is a chance to consider the wider and more inclusive possibility of creating something that can benefit a broader spectrum of people that can also build harmony and community. St Mary's Italian Church was once the center of the community often referred to as"The Italian Neighborhood." Beyond its spiritual mission,the church was also a social center that connected neighbors.Through various groups such as its Holy Rosary Society and Ladies Sodality, it raised funds for local, national and international causes, and assisted the neediest members of the community it was created to serve. Our concept is to revive this community outreach and the soul of the church—not through a religious mission, nor through a service to one sector—but by using the arts as an inviting link that will connect all parts of the community.Together we can mend the frayed relations between the Mission, many in the neighborhood, and residents of the city.Together we can widen all of our visions, and become a stronger and more significant whole. We support the work the Salem Mission is doing by giving people opportunities to end their homelessness, but we believe that the development of this particular building as a community arts center can serve the Mission's clients as well as the larger community.With the funds generated from the purchase of the building, the Salem Mission would have additional dollars to acquire housing for its clients that is both more affordable and more quickly available.The proceeds would enable the Mission to pay down debts and to invest in additional programs. Additionally, Mission clients could be afforded work and educational opportunities at the SCAC, including potential jobs in administration, building maintenance and operations, retail, set construction, and more. Educational outreach could include reduced or free tickets to productions, concerts, and other events, as well as access to classes and even possibly art therapy workshops for clients in need of those services. The Community Center would also preserve the interior and exterior architectural and artistic elements of the building.As artists we will take special pride in caring for the stained glass windows, as well as the frescoes and paintings created in 1950 by Professor Mose Franceschi of Florence, Italy, and his artisans. This center for the arts can become its own community: a place where ideas, art, culture, performance, education, neighborhood and social service converge. It will allow residents, visitors and Mission clients to be engaged, entertained and educated by one another.All of us will be fuller by this exchange and by having such a facility in Salem. ©Zingerplatz Pictures,Inc. 4 Perfect neighbors The initial reaction of some people we have encountered with this idea is that they do not want to displace the homeless. When they read our proposal their attitude generally changes. It is obvious that we support the Mission's goals.Artists do not run from society's problems—it is the essence of many artists'work to meet problems head-on while provoking thought and action. We are the exact opposite of the stereotypical Not In My Back Yard(NIMBY)folks.We support the Mission in our backyard!We want to develop the SCAC at St Mary's BECAUSE the Mission and its clients are in neighboring buildings.We want the Mission to be part of our mission.We are the best possible neighbors because we will work alongside and with the Mission in the uplifting of its clients and in promotion of their programs. Both of us are giving something up in this interaction—the Mission already has blueprints for the 20 housing units it plans for building, while the arts community could find a location that is more appetizing to its audience (we have heard of people reluctant to attend performances next to a homeless shelter), but by combining our energies we can house more homeless, change community perceptions, and re-invigorate the neighborhood while also offering thought-provoking arts programming to residents and tourists. The Salem Mission is trying to ease community concerns, claiming that people need not fear walking by the shelter.The perception of the shelter and homeless people as scary and dangerous is the exact reason we are the perfect tenant and partner for the Mission.We will push each other to be better.This project literally shines a spotlight on the area and can break down stereotypes and false assumptions. We want to involve the Mission's clients in what we do. We want to use this as an opportunity to open the eyes of the community about who the homeless are.We want supporters of the Mission to discover what art can do in terms of engaging, inspiring, and feeding all members of society. In turn, our artists—including, hopefully, some Mission clients themselves—can be enhanced by their interactions with clients of the Mission. It will add to the substance of their work and it will put them in direct contact with a community beyond those that generally attend their exhibits and performances. Advertising and outreach—a constant, viral pitch One of the members of our group, filmmaker Joe Cultrera, approached the Salem Mission several weeks ago with the offer of using his skills to create a short fundraising/image film that would help spread the Mission's story far beyond its current reach. Creating a fundraising film is one thing, but to have a neighbor that—by it mere presence—is constantly shining a light on the work or the Mission and the success stories of its clients is worth 1,000 fundraising films that can constantly be updated. Essentially every exhibit and performance at the SCAC is a fundraising opportunity for the Mission as well as a chance to educate the public. We will put you in front of audiences and potential contributors that you would have never reached.This will have a viral effect as cultural tourists return to tell their friends about this amazing arts/community/social service facility. The thousands of people that SCAC will attract on an annual basis could be put in first-hand contact with Mission clients who may work at SCAC as well as those who we intend to engage creatively at the Center. We foresee potential displays of work created by Mission clients, one act plays and musical pieces co-written by clients and performed by them or by our stage company. We imagine documentaries or short narrative films created by resident filmmakers in conjunction with Mission clients that relate their stories or the stories they want to tell. Through the process of collaboration between our artists and the Mission's clients we can teach them skills such as communication,writing, playwriting, acting, still photography,video camera ©Zingerplatz Pictures,Inc. 5 work, editing, and music. We could set aside blocks of seats for Mission residents at our performances. Not only are we engaging their minds, but we are literally taking them off the streets and making them part of our community. We could include pitches for the Salem Mission and short success stories about Mission clients in our programs at exhibits and performances.We could also work to create events that complement the Mission's agenda. For example,you may be aware of the current film "The Soloist."This film tells the story of an alliance between a journalist(played by Robert Downey Jr) and a homeless musician living on L.A.'s skid row(played by Jamie Foxx). Imagine a special screening of that film sponsored by Salem Film Fest, screened in SCAC's upper hall, followed by a concert and then a short film by and about one of the Mission's success stories, with an audience talk-back involving the Mission staff and clients. It's one thing to have a fundraiser at a neutral site, it's another thing entirely when the donors are being hosted by the people they are contributing to. In terms of outreach and marketing, the creation of this model at St Mary's is so unique that it creates national opportunities. Imagine the NPR story and the article in the New York Times Arts section titled"Art With A Mission." A short fundraising film is a useful tool but imagine a feature-length nationally broadcast documentary debuting at the Sundance Film Festival that tells the amazing and inspirational story about a partnership of art and social services. In it we follow the development of the Salem Community Arts Center—an effort that pulled together disparate factions of a community and salvaged the art of a beautiful old church; created a bond between a neighborhood and a social service agency nobody thought possible; brought dignity and life skills to the homeless; and created a whole new image for a city who's previous claim to fame was a place of historic murder and modern ghoulish tourism.As with all stories of substance,this one is filled with colorful characters, conflict,tension and humor. In the film's climax—just when it seems obvious that all parties involved will never be able to work together—their humanity comes through, a ribbon is cut, a previously homeless man raises a curtain, an aria is sung, and a city is grander for all of it. Neighborhood relations— perceptions and realities The neighborhood where the Salem Mission and St Mary's Italian Church are located has some very real concerns.These issues have created an unhealthy relationship between the neighbors and the Mission.These are generally not NIMBY arguments, but they all hit on one of the following points: 1) "1 don't fee safe walking by the shelter because of what I have seen/heard/experienced/read." 2) "1 don't have a problem with the shelter or the apartment buildings, but why do they need to destroy our beautiful church?" Let's address these two points. 1) Long time residents of the neighborhood will forever be hurting over the seizure of the beloved church it funded, as well as all its assets, by the Catholic Archdiocese of Boston.The subsequent sale of the property to the Salem Mission was fought over for several reasons, including a concern for community safety. While the Mission points to a dramatic decrease in police calls over the last year, any resident who has lived in the neighborhood prior to 2004 knows that—in reality—there has been a dramatic increase since the Mission moved in. By having the Community Center next door and in an interactive relationship with both the Mission and the neighborhood, it moves the Mission to a stronger and more accepted position in the community. The SCAC would have at least one neighborhood member on its board so that ©Zingerplatz Pictures,Inc. 6 the neighborhood's best interest is always part of our decision making.We want to take the neighborhood pulse and be pro-active regarding their concerns.We likewise hope a Mission representative will join the SCAC board, even in just an advisory capacity. 2)The parishioners of St Mary's Italian Church are working class people who have lived out their lives in modesty but who collectively pooled their resources to build a community mansion.They are proud of this building—connected to it spiritually, culturally, and ancestrally. It is not just a building full of objects. It is a museum dedicated to loved ones. The building is a portrait of who they are,where they came from, and what they want to be remembered by. The former St Mary's parishioners we have talked to cling to one hope—that the doors will once again be opened to them.The SCAC would have at least one former St Mary's lay parishioner on its board. They are part of this new community we are building. Parishioner reaction to our proposal has been very supportive.We want to save the interior and exterior integrity of this beautiful building and use it in a manner closer to its original intent.As neighborhood resident Nancy Perroni recently remarked, "The arts center is a great idea. We used to worship God there, now we can celebrate art." Integration versus segregation We believe that homelessness is an issue that can be better managed if the whole community is involved. They should not be stigmatized by an address that profiles them. The Mission can desegregate its clients instead of building a neighborhood or address where the homeless live collectively. Such a vision moves the recently homeless into more integrated housing throughout the city. The committee organizing the SCAC has included, as part of their mission and function, a process to work with the Mission in identifying alternative housing facilities that would provide the needed residences the Mission seeks. These units would satisfy the Mission's criteria for this project: • They would be in relative proximity to the Mission itself(within one square mile). • They would have multiple units in one building to allow for easier supervision by Mission staff and counselors. • They would cost, collectively, far less than the$34 million that the conversion of the church would, saving the Mission money. • They would be available for tenants almost immediately, instead of waiting years for the renovation to be complete. This proposal is undeniably more beneficial to the Mission's objectives. For less money and in less time, they can place just as many of their clients into independent housing, integrated more fully in the Salem community. ©Zingerplatz Pictures,Inc. 7 `l- ` N Sco: Choices There are basically two choices with very clear consequences to each: In the first,the Salem Mission moves ahead with its planned development of the property, resulting in 20 additional units of housing at an estimated cost of$3 to 4 million,within a few years. But is the cost truly only$3 to 4 million?What is the true price to be paid for this development?These conversions, including the essential destruction of this beautiful church's interior(windows, paintings, frescoes, altars)would happen in disregard of community feelings about their former church and their expressed concerns over very real issues of personal safety. While it may be easy to cite reduced calls to the Salem Police station,these concerns are legitimate to the people who live in this neighborhood, particularly the ones who have been here long enough to see the contrast. It is obvious to anyone who has met with members of this neighborhood that this project would further alienate the Mission and its clients from their neighbors.That may not be a major concern on the surface, but if these new housing opportunities are created in a way that further stigmatizes the tenants, what is gained?Does a person simply want a bed to sleep in or do they want to be integrated into society in such a way that they are not looked down upon? The second choice is much more beneficial to every party involved.The Salem Community Arts Center is not about what is best for the Mission versus what is best for the neighborhood it exists in, or the local arts community, or the city itself. Rather,the SCAC is about what is best for all of these communities as one.This is a paradigm shift that creates a new,vibrant, and cohesive community from seemingly scattered and disjointed pieces.The SCAC will create housing, good will, and great public relations by repurposing the church in a way that pleases its founding builders, achieving the goals of many parties, and making the neighborhood block active. Models ©Zingerplatz Pictures,Inc. 8 As previously stated,we cannot give an exact model, since we are proposing a brand new alliance between art, community and social service. What follows are a few examples of New England based art centers that involved conversion techniques. If we are allowed to move forward we would love to involve Mission board members in site visits to these and other identified projects worth investigating. There are a number of models of churches converted into arts centers in the New England region that could serve as excellent starting points for the physical re-use of the building itself. Please also refer to the attached support letter from Arts Gloucester entitled "The transformation of real estate capital into social capital. Diversify your investments while creating unity through creativity."This letter was written by JoAnn Castno. Ms Castano has been a pioneer in creating models of North Shore arts associations including the Salem Cultural Council, a cultural center that was located in Salem's Old Town Hall for several years, and Gloucester's seARTS. i ®. �. U ®r E Firehouse Center for the Arts In 1979, the city of Newburyport was entertaining a proposal from a developer to turn a firehouse, built in 1823, into a hotel.A coalition of community members and arts groups, under the umbrella of the nonprofit Society for the Development of Arts and Humanities of Greater Newburyport (SDAN), came forward with an alternative plan for a community arts center. SDAN raised over $775,000 from over 800 contributors, on top of funds from the city and the Commonwealth. SDAN's team of around 180 volunteers—working in committees—studied other similar community arts centers around the state, cleaned up the property, selected an architectural firm, and raised additional monies for the renovations through grants, benefit concerts, and fundraising appeals. Today, Newburyport's Firehouse Center for the Arts is operated by SDAN,who hires the five paid staffers that run the facility (Executive Director, Membership and Marketing Manager, House Manager and School Shows Coordinator, Box Office and Production Manager, and Art Gallery Director). The building itself is now a multi-use facility and the center-point of Newburyport's restored waterfront.The first floor of the facility includes a lobby and exhibition space, displaying works by local artists and a 125-seat restaurant. Upstairs,the building hosts a 200-seat theater.An addition to the back of the building provides a large function room for receptions, small performances, and conferences. Scheduling and programming of the performance space consists largely, though not exclusively, of a collection of"resident" performing arts groups: North Shore Light Opera Company,the Small City Dance Project, Symphony by the Sea, and Theater of Newburyport. When a resident group is not utilizing the space, SDAN and the Firehouse schedule original programming.They bring in visiting musicians and performance groups and use the proceeds to supplement grants and development in paying for salaries, building costs, etc. Firehouse schedules the shows that appear in the art gallery. ©Zingerplatz Pictures,Inc. 9 I Gloucester Stage Company Founded in 1979,the Gloucester Stage Company(GSC) performed in a Gloucester tavern until a private company, Gorton's Seafood, offered the group free, long-term residence in an unused building the company owned near Rocky Neck. In 2004, GSC purchased the two-story building from Gorton's for$750,000,with the assistance of a favorable loan from Gloucester Cooperative Bank. Owning the building has permitted GSC to undertake major renovations and improvements to the facility totaling another$250,000. Income is additionally generated by leasing out approximately 8600 sq.ft. of first floor retail space in the building. In addition to the retail tenant and GSC, the building includes the Gloucester Stage Conservatory and School.The theater consists of a 1700 sq.ft. newly renovated lobby, a 175 seat theater with a%thrust, 600 sq. ft. stage, a large shop area and comfortable dressing rooms and green room with a private bathroom and shower. Programming is all driven and scheduled by the GSC and their Artistic Director.The GSC Board governs the space and hires the seven person staff(Artistic Director, Production and Facilities Manager, Business Manager,Ticketing and Communications Manager, Media Relations Manager, House and Company Manager, and Assistant Box Office Manager). �5 Franco-American Heritage Center The Catholic Diocese of Portland, Maine, announced that it would be closing St. Mary's Church in Lewiston, in July of 2000.Although St. Mary's days as a beloved church were over, Bishop Gerry announced that the Catholic Diocese of Portland was turning ownership of the church building over to the local community group to create the Franco-American Heritage Center(FAHC). The building was sold to the community group for$1 million but it was done with the understanding that the community group would raise funds to preserve the building and make sure it is maintained in good condition. The FAHC presents symphonic, chamber and choral music, and a variety of other events in the performing arts.With its elegance, splendor and grace, FAHC is an historically and architecturally significant landmark in the community with a primary mission of preserving and promoting all aspects of the Franco-American heritage.This includes its history, language and culture. In its subsequent phase of development, the FAHC will also include a museum and learning center. ©Zingerplatz Pictures,Inc. 10 The FAHC is also the'home away from home' for the 60-member Midcoast Symphony Orchestra, and the Maine Music Society, presenting orchestral, choral and chamber concerts. Heritage Hall not only serves as social space for the Center's themed events and public gatherings, but is available for rent for private and public functions. ARLINGTON CEM1tM FORTHE r � 1s ytur a�te�sul�der avert Arlington Center for the Arts The Arlington Center for the Arts (ACA) is a nonprofit, community arts organization that transforms lives through the arts.ACA offers more than 250 programs annually in the visual, literary, and performing arts, many of which are free to the community. Programs include classes and workshops for adults and children, exhibits, literature readings,theater and music performances, lectures, arts festivals, and many more programs designed to make art accessible to all. • • 0 r � Emerson Umbrella Center for the Arts Emerson Umbrella Center for the Arts (EUCA) is a community arts center located in a town- owned building, a former high school that is leased to a non-profit corporation on a long-term basis. They house over fifty artist studios and classrooms for visual arts, ceramics, dance, music, and creative writing. In addition to arts education, EUCA sponsors Musketaquid Arts and Environment, an outreach program, as well as ArtShare, a program by which resident artists contribute to community service projects.They also host the Concord Poetry Center and collaborate with the weekly newspaper in the Concord Arts Quarterly. ©Zingerplatz Pictures,Inc. 11 Acquisition and renovation funding Arts centers around the country thrive primarily by having 4-8 resident companies, each of which brings in revenue through performances and education. In just one week this community center already has elicited strong interest from at least four prospective resident arts group: Salem Arts Association,A3D/Culture Fest, Salem Theater Company and Salem Sounds, as well as Salem Film Fest.There are other groups that we will soon reach out to who need a home or a downtown Salem presence. Given the large and sophisticated audience for the arts on the North Shore, and the vibrancy and leadership of these existing organizations, it seems very likely that these resident companies will produce the revenue to repay a favorable-interest loan and provide maintenance and staffing for the center. The organizations listed above have thousands of people on their existing email lists, and one of our supporters-CinemaSalem-could add another 2000 or so.These contacts represent a private fundraising network that is already in place. A strategic marketing campaign will be developed to attract donors in advance of the project's completion. Additional private funding can be acquired from the families that built St Mary's Italian Church as well as Italian cultural benefactors and philanthropists in the US and Italy. Further support will be sought from area banks and businesses. Foundation grants, naming opportunities for corporate or major gift donors, and community based fundraising events and solicitations would also be utilized. Public funding is available for this type of project through the Mass Cultural Council's Cultural Facilities Fund and its Adams Grant program. Public funding might also be available through the Massachusetts Preservation Projects Fund for historic restoration projects. Federal funding options, including funds from the National Endowment for the Arts and the National Endowment for the Humanities, are also possibilities. In support of funding opportunities you will find attached for your review a key study entitled Arts &Economic Prosperity 111 conducted by Americans for the Arts that states"The key lesson from Arts&Economic Prosperity II/is that communities that invest in the arts reap the additional benefits of jobs, economic growth, and a quality of life that positions those communities to compete in our 21st century creative economy." Operational funding We have several initial ideas for a business model to keep the SCAC securely solvent. Besides revenue from performances by our member companies,film screenings, and lectures,we would rent the facility to other performing arts groups, as well as for business meetings. The downstairs area could be divided in various ways yet to be determined. Ideas include gallery and office space—generating sales from artworks and rental income.We would also have an educational element to our mission—running courses in art, film, acting,writing, Italian studies, etc—all generating income. Consideration has been given to dedicating space to serve as a North Shore Italian Cultural Center—dedicated to genealogical research and the preservation of historical records and photographs.As part of this element of the facility, a permanent display will serve as homage to the neighborhood and St Mary's Italian Church. Development income would also be available for operational costs.As part of their work, Center staff would engage in regular fundraising, grant writing, and government lobbying to acquire additional funds to support the activities and costs for the Center. ©Zingerplatz Pictures,Inc. 12 Combined, these sources of income(ticket revenue, retail and/or rental income, gift shop, cafe, and development funds)would provide sufficient revenue to maintain and run the Center. Governance model While the precise nature and structure of how the building will be administered is still to be determined, there are models that suggest the best structure is for a governing 501(c)3—the SCAC—and its Board will be the legal operator and fiscal agent of the space.The Board would hire whatever staff determined appropriate to ensure the building is kept in good shape, programs and artists are scheduled appropriately,funds are raised, events are publicized, etc.The resident arts groups would probably have representation on the Board and a model for the division of ticket or retail revenues between the SCAC and resident groups determined. Summary In summary,this basic proposal encourages the Mission to think more broadly and deeply about the re-use and re-purposing of the St Mary's church facility.While the development of the site into private housing units might be initially appealing, we suggest that this vision—transformation into a community arts center—is a far better plan for everyone.The arts community gains a permanent and magnificent venue.The community regains access to their church and has their eyes opened to what the Mission truly accomplishes.And the Mission gains a renewed relationship with the community, the desired housing units in a less expensive and more rapid fashion, and the chance to offer their clients a unique job and experiential relationship with the arts. ©Zingerplatz Pictures,Inc. 13 SALEM COMMUNITY ARTS CENTER We the undersigned support the idea of developing the building formerly known as St Mary's Italian Church as a Salem Community Arts Center. The Salem Mission currently owns this property and has proposed developing the building as 20 housing units for its clients.We support the work the Salem Mission is doing by giving people opportunities to end their homelessness, but we believe that the development of this particular building as a Community Center can serve the Mission's clients as well as the larger community.With the purchase and reuse of the building,the Salem Mission would have additional funds to work with to acquire housing for its clients that is both more affordable and more quickly available. Additionally, Mission clients would be given work and educational opportunities at the Community Center.The Community Center would preserve the interior and exterior architectural and artistic elements of the building.With the proceeds from the sale, the Mission can then have the flexibility to invest in additional programs and its housing opportunities, so the community and the Mission both win. This Arts Center can become its own community: a place where ideas, art, culture, performance, education, neighborhood and social service converge. It will allow residents, visitors and Mission clients to be engaged, entertained and educated by one another.All of us will be fuller by this exchange and by having such a facility in Salem. Name Address Email or phone contact ©Zingerplatz Pictures,Inc. 14 r Petition Signatory Comments As a former urban planner and architectural coordinator for the city of Salem I whole heartedly support the concept of a community center for the arts.Andy Innes I am a member of the Salem Arts Association and we need a center for our art exhibits. The church will be close enough to downtown to be part of Salem's attraction and will be close to parking for the convenience of viewers. I am speechless, this is about the best thing I can think of to add to the re-positioning and growth of Salem, not to mention the importance of our community and our country recognizing the significant impact of the creative economy. Run the new center as a business, even it is a Not- For-Profit to realize maximum success! This is a tremendous opportunity for a win win for all! Instead of the Salem Mission just adding housing, a sale to a group for the purposes of an arts and cultural center would allow the Salem Mission to use the proceeds from the sale to invest in housing AND create a cultural arts center that can contribute to community in many in ADDITION to providing housing. 1+1 can=3 Salem arts community is growing and is inclusive. Please support the request for a Salem Community Arts Center and the Italian Church. A great investment in the community for all. A city without an arts center is a lightbulb without electricity. salem has become a magnet city for artists of all kinds. our downtown has the potential to be a thriving and supportive cultural phenomenon. this is already happening with the various satellite organizations including the salem arts association, the salem theatre company,the peabody essex museum, and the various cafes that support a thriving local performance community, the area surrounding riley plaza has enormous potential as a downtown hub. I support the idea of developing the building formerly known as St Mary's Italian Church as a Salem Community Arts Center. Please keep our main streets and center of Salem clean. This is not the location for a homeless shelter. Salem arts community is growing and is inclusive. Please support the request for a Salem Community Arts Center and the Italian Church. A city as eclectic as Salem needs an Arts Center. Yes please! An artscenter is something Salem is just aching for, I support this initiative whole- heartedly! Sounds like a win/win/win situation.What a great opportunity for the citizens of Salem to have a home for the growing "creative economy", a place that will foster arts education on the North Shore and an organization that can provide employment and enrichment for the entire community. I support the Community Art Center as well as the Salem Mission.They should build green condos and have it be completely self-sufficient rather than retrofitting an old church...Thanks and ood luck I attended SSC for my undergrad in art education. I think that having a Community Arts Center would be a fantastic addition to the developing & maturing art scene in the city. ©Zingerplatz Pictures,Inc. 15 CIO RIAN P. et be level-fu at 20- . fighters Assoclation employees would likely be laid off from u IAFF Local 2038 various departments unless steps could be public-safetyjobs.' Danvers identified to reduce the projected cost of of order by Town Moderato e St. Mary's Church is a "historic artifact rly. To the editor: housing, it must first comply and the frescos would have to If the church is declared his- ' g "Here today,gone tomorrow," with the state's requirement be destroyed as well. toric,the mission,in my opinion, -corn- not only pertains to people, that the window openings in The Salem Historic Commis- will not be able to architectur- ittee but it also pertains to historic each dwelling unit be at least 4 sion must decide whether or ally alter the church in any Char- buildings. percent of the square footage. not St.Mary's Church qualifies way. epre- Salem's No. 1 industry is its But since the windows are as a historic site.The state said Since Salem's economy , outs: history and tourism.That is our only 3 percent,it must remove that they will act upon what depends largely on tourism, onald bread and butter. the stained-glass windows and the local Historic Commission it must save all of its historic x and Here in Salem we have a his- install regular windows in their recommends. buildings. berg, toric building,St.Mary's Italian place in order to comply with If the Salem Historic Commis- In the past, many historic e Church, which could soon be the state's requirements. sion declares that the church is buildings were destroyed such Day destroyed unless we p5y close Some time ago the mission historic,the state will go along as the witch's jail on Federal attention to the architectural ' promised that the church would with it.The local Historic Com- Street. Let.us not continue to Ray- plan that the mission'for'the„ stay intact and nothing would mission has already met, but make the same mistakes. for homeless has for it. architecturally be done to alter has yet to make a decision.The ANTHONY V.SALVO were The Salem Mission intends to the interior in any way, shape local commission is waiting to Salem This convert the church into 20 units' or manner. see how the Mayor and City (Editor's note:Anthony Salvo rick of affordable housing, some- Not only will the windows be Council feel about it. is a former mayor of Salem.) actu- thing of which Salem has,more removed,but the marble altar ___'_____ _ __ ear's than its share. a g. For instance,at 50 Palmer St. �3lst Annual New England unity there are some 40 brand-new, e• 't,[�—ry p dthat affordable housing units and i.-, L�J -F Arts Crafts Festival ening not one unit has been sold vNels'TaJr LJ endlyl two years,which goes to prove e j Labor Day Weekend ESIWA that there is little demand for ��„�o � Waste affordable housing in Salem. bgNelaod Renton mittee In order for the mission to con- easssricxerrrs.caN/wttxusox �* Saturday Sunday everly vert the church into affordable ;* Sept. 5 Sept. 6 *� 10am to Spm Daily I i Topsfield Fairgrounds Route 1 North,Topsfield, MA d sweet. ; ow Arts, (La Fog Live ' k k. 1111 w r v z A F Sports Injuries °1 " Chronic Hetadaches r Exceptional dental care in a y, , relaxed, comfortable setting •Pinched Nerves .Fibromyalgia _ DONNA FINOCCHIARO, D.M.D. .Sinusitis } SaWndayAppointments Available •Tendonitis 4 •Bursitis 491 Maple St.,Suite 302 Open 7 to 7,Saturdays 8.12 Danvers,MA 01923 All Insurances Accepted Fresh 978-750.0035 978 . 774 . 5600 Brian is Pork want t r w altern' Tenderloin '09'10 REGISTRATION x DANCE ALL AGES 299Ib. CLASSICAL BALLET ACROBATICS Kicks J u$Just Q r fn shi ZUMBA FITNESS *Tap ce School Linda4Arden Viaira P HOP *Sdt HIP Director _ = e�� r tvBlcaL *jaz CALL TO kf �■i ' POINTE ,*tAc ote REGISTER JAll ■ Co TAP * oYn '` *Kinder Darhitie *Minder jazz were i Dance Center i i� *pre-Sehooi Dance "I w r Classes are available for all basis,' ;,„ +, 261 Andover SL Route 114,Peabody a 6walnutsheet,Peabody came', • 978.535.5147 978-531-3311 Dorc a � _�,• �' "'s � � �a pound agreed" a eed DENTIST bar el ESSEX STREET Whole DENTAL MEDICINE — Seedless JEFFREY M. CASIGLIA DMD, DMSC Watermelon '"9l �,. B COMPREHENSIVE DENTAL CARE 39eat All services provided under one me. .t ,F_.. .. r... .".,.... -. -Enjoy Get�f denturescwith nto one hour wh:_ 21 August 2009 Mr.Ryan T Maciej Preservation Planner Massachusetts Historical Commission 220 Morrissey Boulevard Boston,MA 02125 RE:Saving St.Mary's Italian Church Dear Mr.Maciej, We the undersigned are writing to express my concern regarding the Salem Mission's proposal for its Phase 111,Seeds of Hope Campus and what this proposal will mean to the history of Salem.We hope you will include this letter when deliberating over the Mission's plans to convert the former St. Mary's Italian Church into 20 housing units-a plan that involves the destruction of the church's art, architecture and stained glass windows. The church's beautiful Bavarian stained glass windows hold some of the final remnants of the history of this once predominantly Italian-American neighborhood.The names on those stained glass windows refer to Italian-Americans that immigrated to Salem in the late 1800's.These are the very last evidence in Salem of the lives of these individuals and this collective neighborhood. We have supported the Salem Mission in the past.We cannot support the Salem Mission's plan to destroy a place of beautiful art and architecture such as St Mary's in order to create housing for 20 people. The Salem Mission has moved forward with their plans to retrofit St.Mary's under a cloak of secrecy. Likewise,we are sure the Mission has not made the Massachusetts Historical Commission aware of the importance of this building to the community.Joe Cultrera,a neighborhood resident,has proposed an alternative use for St. Mary's-a Salem Community Arts Center(SCAC).This Arts Center could benefit all by saving the integrity of the building's interior and exterior,creating jobs and engagement for Mission residents and adding a cultural destination spot for Salem.We do not presently have an arts center in Salem. On May 3,2009,the Salem Mission announced their plans to retrofit the church for housing, promising that the exterior would remain the same.On May 5,2009,The Salem News wrote an editorial in support of the Salem Community Arts Center.On May 13,2009,the SCAC coalition presented their proposal to the Salem Mission's board of directors.The Salem Mission said it was willing to seriously consider the SCAC proposal,giving this newly formed group just one month to present a financial package that included an unspecified amount of cash-hinted to be upwards of $750,000 to a$1,000,000. On May 19,2009 the SCAC organizers and representatives from the Salem Mission had a meeting with the Mayor of Salem to discuss the proposal for an arts center.The SCAC organizers were encouraged to continue their efforts and have done so in good faith.On June 22,2009,the Salem City Council held a public meeting where the community expressed concerns regarding the expansion of the Salem Mission in the church building. St. Mary's Italian Church is much greater than a religious symbol for its former parishioners.St. Mary's is a stunning example of art and architecture in Salem; it is a building filled with seven different kinds of marble,beautiful stained glass windows,a fresco and 14 murals painted by Professor Mose Franceschi from the School of Art in Florence,and many other memorials and dedications to loved ones.The wonderful pipe organ was in fine working order when it was unplugged a few short years ago. The proposal for an arts center has the support of ten out of our eleven city councilors.Mayor Kimberly Driscoll and Representative John Keenan have urged the Salem Mission to delay their plans and give the SCAC organizers more time to better explore the possibility of funding an arts center. Perhaps most notable is the fact that the arts center even has the support of Salem Mission residents as signatories on their petition—a courageous act on the part of individuals who believe an arts center at St Mary's can co-exist with a plan for Salem Mission housing elsewhere. We question the value of granting millions in taxpayer money to the Salem Mission for a project to convert a former church building that is so loved,so historically important and so ill suited for housing.In this economy and today's housing market this money could go a lot further at a different site and house many more than 20 individuals.There are other available sites in and around Salem, including some within a short walk from the Mission's campus.A prime example is the existing Salem Mission center which is located next to the church-this is a property that could be built upon. We are asking you and your review committee to please consider the extenuating circumstances surrounding the removal of the church's stained glass windows,particularly in light of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966.We respect and support the Salem Mission's goals,but we wish they showed this city's heritage a similar respect.Please help us save our history. Thank you for your consideration of this important matter. Sincerely, cc: President Obama Governor Deval Patrick Senator Frederick Berry Representative John Keenan Congressman John Tierney Tina Brooks,Undersecretary, Department of Housing and Community Development Jane Guy,Clerk,Salem Historic Commission We the undersigned want to save the artistic and architectural integrity of St Mary's Italian Church as outlined in the above document RE:Saving St.Mary's Italian Church. Z it _� ICS Ni rt ;, 1, - . -Pt &A 77 � o ry7p 83 „J 7xa. 6! 970 �4 Sf C' aC4 � We the undersigned want to save the artistic and architectural integrity of St Mary's Italian Church as outlined in the above document RE:Saving St.Marys Italian Church. PA 5D;-izo,� 17ALY WG4TJ„ -t dcY9�+'�' �ctso� aa. .I�ww,ci 11/ly o3Sb'(-33oC) OCEW Stg;xji P.�-c�U76 \N_ n 3 -CA 7 C(-0 C�2Cirf �, CX yC) CjII �Gp�t, . � �TV�'jj� �j -SuS Ot K 1ba L C a.0 y'S 7a mks ovt U/ 9 7l> d na 20 w! W-J/'a ,'hrov{�Sf. Salem v 1 a '� le Cr2YY , `� l qo -fir. � , Disco 47K 7Yj--�i31 Citp Of *alrm, f 8 !5,gar u!5rtt!5 ��" ®ffite of tlje (lCitp 6-0until �itp fall COUNCILLORS-AT-LARGE PAUL C. PREVEY WARD COUNCILLORS PRESIDENT 2009 2009 THOMAS H. FUREY CHERYL A. LAPOINTE ROBERT K. MCCARTHY JOAN B. LOVELY CITY CLERK MICHAEL SOSNOWSKI STEVEN A. PINTO JEAN M. PELLETIER ARTHUR C. SARGENT III JERRY L. RYAN MATTHEW A. VENO PAULC. PREVEY JOSEPH A.O'KEEFE, SR. Jessica Herbert, Chair September 8, 2009 Salem Historic Commission Salem City Hall 120 Washington Street Salem, MA 01970 Re: Salem Mission Seeds of Hope Project Dear Chairwoman Herbert and Members of the Board: Please accept this letter as my opposition to the Salem Mission Seeds of Hope Project to convert the former St. Mary's Italian Church to housing. My reasons therefore are as follows: 1. On or about March 27, 2003, as then Ward Three Councillor, I sponsored a Council Order relative to the Crombie Street Mission's desire to move the Mission from Crombie Street to the former St. Mary's parish property. A public meeting was held shortly thereafter wherein about one hundred neighbors attended and voiced their opposition to the move. Then Mayor Usovicz agreed to send a letter to the Mission asking that other properties be considered for the Mission's new location. To my knowledge no response was received from the Mission. 2. On or about January 12, 2004, Mayor Usovicz received a communication from then Executive Director Rev. Linda Reilly requesting a meeting updating the mayor relative to the Mission's plans to purchase St. Mary's Church from the Archdiocese of Boston. 3. On or about June 10, 2004, the City Council Committee on Community and Economic Development held a meeting relative to the Mission and voted to refer the matter to the Committee of the Whole to hold a public meeting for the neighbors. 4. On or about June 16, 2004, the Rev. Linda Reilly, as Executive Director of the Salem Mission issued a Community Letter disclosing negotiations between the SALEM CITY HALL • 93 WASHINGTON STREET • SALEM, MA 01970-3592 •WWW.SALEM.COM I- Mission and the Archdiocese about purchasing the church ad campus buildings and specifically telling the citizens of Salem that the Mission was working diligently with the Archdiocese to 'leave behind the stain glassed windows" and that "we (Salem Mission) have grown to love and respect the extraordinary beauty of the church — the artwork and marble alter as well as the windows." "We will continue to do all we can to preserve this outstanding building." Further, the letter stated that "We understand that there may be apprehension and concern about the sale of the property to our Church and the plan to move the Salem Mission to the Youth/Community Center." "This may bring comfort to some and not to others, but out shelter and other programs will be housed in the Youth Center and there will not be people sleeping in the church." And, the letter stated that "The church, however, will remain a church and we will continue to give glory and praise to God worshipping the sanctuary." 5. On or about June 21, 2004, the Committee of the Whole held a public meeting and invited the neighbors to discuss the Mission's desire to purchase St. Mary's Church. The meeting was attended by approximately 100 neighbors and residents including Andrew Oliver, member of the Salem Mission Board of Directors, Rev. Linda Reilly, Executive Director of the Salem Mission, Capt. Rodney Comeau of the SPD, Building Inspector Tom St. Pierre, Assessor Frank Kulik, Attorney George Atkins, legal counsel for the Salem Mission, and Nadine Hanscom, head of the then Greater High Street Neighborhood Association. Mr. Oliver testified that the Salem Mission would move to the St. Mary's Youth Center and that the church would be remain as a church and be used as a church, and that no one would sleep in the church. Rev. Reilly testified that she was "thrilled" for the opportunity for the Crombie Street Church to move to the "sanctuary" of St. Mary's for worship and that St. Mary's would remain open to the public not only for church services and public/private worship, but also for community activities like concerts or other community sponsored events. She testified that the shelter and support services would be housed in the community center with the long term goal of building out the other church campus buildings for long term housing to end homelessness, and the church building itself would remain a church building. Many residents spoke in support of keeping the St. Mary's Church intact and that no housing be put in the church. 6. On or about February 12, 2005, a Task Force of Homelessness met and discussed issues related to homelessness around Salem. Jeff Cox of 58 Endicott Street took minutes of the meeting which are attached hereto. Questions were posed relative to aesthetics, parking, and specifically "Will there be any changes in the church?" which was answered that "There will be no changes in the church building and edifices. The church services will remain." Since these meetings took place, changes have taken place at the Salem Mission. Rev. Linda Reilly's job description was changed and she was let go as the Executive Director. 2 The Salem Mission has changed its non-profit status from religious to educational. The Mission has built out its campus buildings to transitional housing and has also expanded its services to its clients and guests, all as part of its plan and mission to end homelessness. And sadly, the Mission has recently announced its plans to convert the former St. Mary's Italian Church to housing, with the intent to remove the stain glass windows, cover most of the paintings and frescos inside the structure, and close the church building itself to the public, all in contradiction of its continued public promises to the community that it would keep the church building a church building. It is for the aforementioned reasons that I oppose the build out of St. Mary's Italian Church for housing as requested by the Salem Mission Seeds of Hope and I ask the Salem Historic Commission to go on record in opposition as well. Thank you for your attention in this regard. V truly yours / / rr J n B. Lovely ouncillor at Large 3 In City Council January 22, 2004 y Referred to the Committee on Community and Economic Development g CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS STANLEY J. USOVICZ, JR. MAYOR January 22, 2004 To the City Council City Hall Salem, Massachusetts Ladies and Gentlemen of the Council: Enclosed, for your information, is a letter from Salem Mission Executive Director Linda Riley concerning the Shelter's plans to purchase the former St. Mary's church from the Archdiocese of Boston. Very truly yours, STANLEY J. USOVICZ, JR. Mayor SJU/Imm SALEM CITY HALL• 93 WASHINGTON STREET • SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970-3592 •978/745-9595 •FAX 978/744-9327 SA MIS 3,r0 The Salem Mission at Zbe Crombie 16treet 'Mnitea Cburcb of Cbrizt n Seven Crombie Street, PO Box 810 p Salem, MA 01970 Phone: (978) 744-0500, (978) 745-1121 Fax:(978) 740-3832 .sowing seeds of hope- www.salemmission.org salemmissio\n@�juno.com Ell 9 Mayor Stanley Usovicz @ E: D 3 ' City Hall D 93 Washington St. JAN 1 2004 Salem, MA 01970 CrTy,oF SALEM January 12, 2004 MAYOR'S OFFICE Dear Mayor Usovicz, I'm writing t o request a meeting with you and some members of the Salem Mission Board of Governors to update you on our plans to go forward with the purchase of the property of the former St. Mary's Church from the Archdiocese of Boston. We understand from Mr. John McGrath that he and other representatives of the Archdiocese met with you last week and told you of our offer and their acceptance of that offer. We would now like to meet and keep you informed of the process we are undertaking and receive any suggestions or comments you may have. It is our desire and intent to work cooperatively with the City and the neighborhood and community at large to make this move to benefit not only the Salem Mission and the people we serve, but to do so with the good of the community in mind and in a collaborative spirit. Since your conversation with the Archdiocese, we have held a congregational meeting of Crombie St. Church at which time it was voted to go forward with the acquisition of that property and to list and sell our current building, the property at 7 Crombie St. We wanted you to know of our plans from the earliest stage. We are putting together a community impact statement and plan to make a public statement after signing a Purchase & Sales Agreement, which is likely to happen before the end of the month. We wanted to meet with you and with Ward 3 Councilor Jean Pelletier prior to any public declaration or outreach to the neighborhood. We will call your office to arrange a mutually convenient time for a meeting, and we look forward to discussing this very exciting opportunity with you. Thank you. Sincerely, Rev. Linda Reilly Executive Director Salem Mission vS�`' - vlO 11 IC �GIIGI I I IVII01 I ��' at fie Crombie streetnitetS.Lfiurch of( ilrist Seven Crombie Street, PO Box 810 Salem, MA 01970 Phone: (978) 744-0500, (978) 745-1121 Fax:(978) 740-3832 W 'sowing seeds of hope' www•salemmission.org salemmission@junc.com To: Community of Salem From: Rev, Linda Reilly, Pastor Date: June 1.6,2004 With the closing of St. Mary's Italian Catholic Church and now of St Joseph's and St.Thomas our hearts and prayers go out to you in this time of grief. The people of St. Mary's have and other will suffer a tremendous loss. The congregation of Crombie Street Church and all those associated with the Salem Mission acknowledge the pain and sadness that this has caused you. We honor your devotion to your churches and dedication to your community. We ask God's blessings on you as you seek out other churches and hope that you will find a community of faith that will become a spiritual home. During the last few months, we have succeeded in our negotiations with the Archdiocese to leave behind the stained glass windows at St_Marv's. We have grown to love and respect the extraordinary beauty of the church - the artwork and marble altar as well as the windows. We will continue to do all we can to preserve this outstanding building. We understand that there may be apprehension and concern about the sale of the property to our Church, and the olan to move the Salem Mission to the Youth/Community Center. This may bring comfort to some and not to others, but our shelter and other programs will be housed in the Youth Center and there will not be people sleeping_in the church. The church, however, will remain a church and we will continue to give glory and praise to God worshipping in the sanctuary. The doors will once again be open and we would welcome everyone to come and visit, to pray and to worship God. While all our welcome . at our worship services, I understand that it is not your tradition. We also want to have the sanctuary open at times for private prayer and devotion for all of you to once again for all in the community to share in this beautiful and spiritually uplifting place. To my clergy colleagues, I would be open to having you officiate funerals for St. Mary's parishioners there if that is possible and would be comforting to the families. Our move to St. Mary's is an opportunity for the church to continue its mission to serve God by remaining as a church and serving the community, through the ministry of the Salem Mission. Jesus calls us all "to feed the hungry, clothe the naked, welcome the stranger... and as we do to the least of our brothers and sisters, we do to him" our Lord. Serving in Christ's Name, Rev. Linda Reilly / Pastor, Crombie St. United Church of Christ Executive Dsector,_Salem..Mission Feel free to copy and distribute orpost Notes from community meeting file:///C:/Users/Steve/Desktop/Joan%20Recovered%20Files/CCIY%2000UNCLUC11 Y%.. From: Joan Lovely U oan.love ly2@verizon.net] Sent: Friday, January 14, 2005 8:40 AM To: 'nhanscom@comcast.net' Subject: FW: Notes from community meeting Hi Nadine, Here are the notes from the meeting. Talk to you soon. Joan From: Salem Mission [mailto:salemmission@juno.com] Sent:Thursday, January 13, 2005 8:55 AM To: aoliver@transatlanticcapital.com; twswdwrkr@aol.com; BonnieH@Krinos.com; bobc.spd@verizon.net; amarald@northshoreYMCA.org; dgreel@salemmainstreets.org; jeffrey.cox2@comcast;joan.lovely2@verizon.net;jpelletier7@hotmail.com; ksullivan@salem.com; revljr@juno.com; nhanscom@comcast.net; Pamela_Lombardini@map.uscourts.gov; PauI_Prevey@map.uscourts.gov Subject: Notes from community meeting Hi All, I think it went well last night! Deb did an excellent job moderating! Thanks to Billy, Kate and everyone for starting the coffee and getting things ready and bringing so many goodies. The guests at lunch will be pleased with the left overs. Got this from Jeff last night. Passing along Linda Greetings! Here are the notes from the community meeting. Great meeting! Please distribute freely. Jeff Cox Jeffrey M. Cox 58 Endicott Street #2 Salem, MA 01970 telephone: (781) 632-9723 E-mail: jeffrey.cox2@comcast.net I of 4 9/8/2009 4:27 PM Notes from community meeting file:///C:/Users/Steve/Desktop/Joan%20Recovered%20Files/CITY%2000UNCIUCITY%.. SALEM HOMELESS COMMISSION Wednesday, February 12, 2005 7:00 p.m.—Salem Mission at Open Door UCC INTRODUCTION Introduction by speakers/moderators of event. Persons from the task force were introduced. The Task Force of the Homeless met and discussed issues related to homelessness around Salem. The goal of the task force is to continue to meet and make progress. PRESENTATION • There was a list of frequently asked questions passed out about The Seeds of Hope Campus of the Salem Mission. • It was mentioned that homeless people die earlier than the average population. • Thomas Jefferson Coolidge, a member of the Board of Governors of Salem Mission, was remembered. • A history of development of the Salem Mission at Open Door UCC was recanted. The Salem Mission purchased the stain glass windows from the Archdiocese of Boston for $30,000 because it was important for the neighborhood. • The Salem Mission is part of a national movement to improve homeless services from institutional homelessness to a way to deal with homelessness itself. We are ending the funding of homelessness and dealing with homeless people. There are expectations of guests: they need to work through the programs and graduate to independent living programs. • The Salem Mission Board is excited about the plan to move people forward to help them through homelessness. • Q: Will a successful Salem Mission bring more homelessness to Salem?A: It is great to help people end homelessness and be a model for others to end homelessness. SERVICES OF THE SALEM MISSION • HOUSING: Salem does not have a homeless family shelter. The Department of Transitional Assistance makes referrals for family shelters. Individuals go to Salem Mission; 57 percent are Salem residence. • FEEDING: The feeding program has 90 percent neighborhood residence. Part of the population comes from rooming housing in the area. There are no income guidelines for the feeding program. • FOOD PANTRY: Many of the people using the food pantry are living on the edge. People can come one time per week for three days worth of groceries. • DAY SERVICES: The Salem Mission has day services, which is uncommon for area shelters. Many people need support for day services to serve the guests. Many people from the community utilize day services. • It is expected that the services will be continued on the new campus. • New services on education and job training will be added on the new campus. The goal is to help people get training for a job for a new 2 of 4 9/8/2009 4:27 PM Notes from community meeting file:///C:/Users/Steve/Desktop/Joan%2oRecovered%20Files/CICY%2000UNCILCt trio... job that will sustain them in housing. • Many of the disabled need help working with Social Security system to get the process in place. Some of the disabled may stay longer. Some chronic homelessness has lived in an institutional setting for months and years; they need various supported services for permanent housing. People will live on Endicott Street property with supported services. • The Mission is sowing seeds of hope for people with various needs. QUESTIONS 1. Community of the Mission: Concern about when people are turned away from the Mission; where do they go, wait, and hang out. Where do people who are turned away who are intoxicated go? ■ A: There is a referral of substance abuse individuals to wet shelters and/or others services. People who are intoxicated are fed because alcoholics have malnutrition. 2. Aesthetics of Mission: Concern about sign of Thrift shop—spray painted mattress for sign. ■ A: The Mission will look into this issue. 3. Parking: What will happen with parking? ■ A: The Mission has six parking spaces. There is no expectation for parking on High Street or Endicott Street. Volunteers will park behind youth center. The Taskforce will look at parking issues. SALEM POLICE: Salem Police will look at issues related to parking and have communication with the shelter. 4. Who is the Homeless task force? ■ A: The task force is composed of various individuals looking at the Mission and eventually looks at greater homelessness issues. There are a lot of resources available that people do not know about. The task force is a volunteer group. The Council Order allows the neighborhood residence a place to have a forum. 5. Are there problems with the Crombie Shelter neighborhood? § A: The Salem Police is actively policing in the neighborhood. There were concerns about individual police officers that spoke negatively about the shelter. Salem Police said that Salem is one of the safest cities in the area. Salem has the resources to handle any problems. Salem Police believe that the new shelter location will not be a problem. The city pays the shelter for 25 hours per week of community policing protection around the neighborhood [Tiny]. 6 Will there be another community meeting after 3-4 months of the opening of the Shelter? § A: Yes, there will be a meeting sometime after the opening. The Task Force discussed quarterly meetings. 7 What about lighting around the Pratt Street Park and Pratt Street? § A: The City is concerned about lighting. The City Electrician will be discussed with immediate abutters. The City is 3 of 4 9/8/2009 4:27 PM Notes from community meeting file:///C:/Users/Steve/Desktop/Joan%20Recovered%2OFiles/CCI'Y°/a2000UNCIUC,rt A. looking at fencing issues. 8. Can You discuss successes? § A: There is such diversity in skill levels. It will be on a case-by-case basis. A highly motivated person takes nine months to complete the program. Other disabled persons will come and stay at the shelter. The goal is not to institutional homelessness. 9. Will there be any changes in the church? § A: There will be no changes in the church building and edifices. The church services will remain. 4 oto 9/8/2009