SALEM HISTORICAL COMMISSION CORRESPONDENCE 2012 Salem Historical
Commission Correspondence
i
F,
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth ?
Massachusetts Historical Commission
October 4, 2012
Mayor Kimberly Driscoll
City of Salem
93 Washington Street
Salem,MA 01970
Re: National Register of Historic Places,North Street Fire Station
Dear Mayor Driscoll:
We are pleased to inform you that the North Street Fire Station, 142 North Street, Salem, Massachusetts,
will be considered by the Massachusetts Historical Commission for nomination to the National Register
of Historic Places. The National Register of Historic Places is the Federal government's official list of
historic properties worthy of preservation. Listing in the National Register provides recognition and
assists in preserving our nation's heritage.
Listing of this property provides recognition of the community's important historic resources and assures
protective review of Federal projects that might adversely affect the character of the property. If the
property is listed in the National Register, certain Federal investment tax credits for rehabilitation and r.
other provisions may apply.
Listing in the National Register does not mean that limitations will be placed on the properties by the .
Federal government. Public visitation rights are not required of property owners. The Federal
government will not attach restrictive covenants to the property or seek to acquire it. If a property is
listed in the National Register, the owner may do anything with it that he/she wishes, unless state or
federal funds, permits, or licensing are used, or unless some other regional and/or local ordinance or
policy is in effect.
In Massachusetts,properties nominated to the National Register are automatically listed in the State
Register of Historic Places. There are no limitations, public visitation requirements, or restrictive
covenants for private properties included in the State Register. State Register properties owned by
municipalities and nonprofit organizations may compete for state restoration grants.
220 Morrissey Boulevard,Boston, Massachusetts 02125
(617) 727-8470 • Fax: (617)727-5128
www.state.ma.us/sec/mhc
You are invited to attend the meeting of the Massachusetts Historical Commission at which the
nomination will be considered. The Commission will meet at 1:00 p.m. on Wednesday, December 12,
2012, at the Massachusetts State Archives,Dorchester,Massachusetts. The Commission meeting is a
public meeting and all interested parties are encouraged to attend. If you have special needs and would
like to attend the meeting, please contact the Commission and staff will make any arrangements that are
necessary.
A draft copy of the National Register nomination will be sent to the Salem Public Library. Attached
please find notices that explain, in greater detail,the results of listing in the National Register and that
describe the rights and procedures by which an owner may comment on or object to listing in the
National Register. Should you have any questions about these nominations prior to the Massachusetts
Historical Commission meeting, please.contact me at this office.
Sincerely,
Brona Simon
State Historic Preservation Officer
Massachusetts Historical Commission
cc: Lisa Mausolf, consultant
Jane uy, Salem CLG Coordinator
ssica Herbert, Salem Historical Commission
Salem Planning Board .
enclosures
e'
1, Avva Patterson
14 Stratford Lane, Jackson, TPI 38305
141ndwalkerwoMA,vaho.com 731-2340982
September 10 ( 012
The Honorable Kimberly Driscoll, Mayor
93 Washington Street ,- o
u
Salem, MA 01970
Dear Mayor Driscoll:
I have had the opportunity to visit Salem. It is an intriguing and
entertaining town. The many facets of the towns' history make visiting
there a rich and rewarding experience.
There is one issue that has continued to trouble me since my time in
Salem, and I have found nothing so far in the history that addresses this
concern.
A sizable portion of your history revolves around the Witch Hysteria;
both the actual events and the efforts of subsequent generations to address
effects, make restitution, and find peace in the aftermath. Yet despite the
efforts of so many and all of the steps you have taken, I have been unable
to find a record of an actual Christian funeral for each and/or all of the
victims.
The Pagan and Wiccan communities are continually drawn to Salem
because the Hysteria reflects the centuries persecution and death their
people endured during what they call `the burning times'. This makes
their interest and involvement appropriate and very understandable.
F. Ma Patterson
14 Stratford Lane, Jackson, TN 38305
indwatkerwolllAyaho.co 731-234-0982
However, the victims of the Hysteria in Salem were not Pagan. They
were pretty fundamentalist Christians, people who died rather than
renounce that fact. They lived as Christians, they died as Christians, and
although there have been a myriad of actions acknowledging the wrong
done to these people; have they ever been put to rest as Christians?
I understand there is no way to locate their bodies at this late date. But
there are funerals and services given for even the sailor lost at sea to
commend their soul to God.
If this hasn't been done yet, I suggest that is the final debt owed the
victims.
A service for each and all could be performed privately by clergy,. or
include a gathering for the people of Salem, or the whole world invited.
The format is secondary to that `commending each of their souls to God'
as the Christians they were, or aspired to be.
I hope this suggestion is useful to the people of Salem. If you do have a
service, please let me know. I would be honored to attend.
Thanks for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
Cc: Historical Commission
No Place for Hate Committee
Cemetery Committee
Citizens' Advisory Commission
Jane Guy
From: Lynn Duncan
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 8:13 AM
To: Danielle McKnight; Frank Taormina; Jane Guy; Kathleen Winn; Naomi Francisco; Natalie
Lovett; Paul Marquis; Tom Daniel; Tom Devine
Subject: FW: MEPA Scoping Session EEA# 14937 Salem Harbor Station Redevelopment
Importance: High
Please forward to your respective boards, with the exception of, the Housing Trust Fund.
Thanks,
Lynn
Lynn Goonin Duncan, AICP
Director
Department of Planning & Community Development City of Salem 120 Washington Street Salem,
MA 01970
T: 978-619-5685
F. 978-740-0404
-----Original Message-----
From: Buckley, Deirdre (ENV) [mailto:deirdre.buckley@state.ma.us]
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 2:36 PM `
To: Mayor; Joan Lovely; Cheryl LaPointe; Larry Ramdin; Lynn Duncan; Richard Rennard; Tom
Devine; wileyk@marblehead.org; conservation@marblehead.org; pettya@marblehead.org;
townclerk@marblehead.org; tonys@marblehead.org; kconnoliy@beverlyma.gov;
bburke@beverlyma.gov; tcassidy@beverlyma.gov; mayor@beverlyma.gov; amaxner@beverlyma.gov;
aadams; Adams, Karen; Anderson, Paul (DEP) ; Backman, Andy (DCR) ; Baker, Nancy (DEP) ;
Black, Kristin E (MISC) ; Boeri, Robert (ENV) ; Bourre, Richard (ENV) ; Chin, Ken (DEP) ;
Chisholm, Chris (AGR) ; Christopher.Boelke@Noaa.gov; Cornock, Jed;
David.M.Keddell@nae02.usace.army.mil; Dorr Fox (dfox@capecodcommission.org) ; -Eric Arbenne
(earbeene@ocperpa.org) ; Eric.Hutchins@noaa.gov; Evans, Tay (MISC) ; Feeney, Eileen (FWE) ;
Felix, John (DEP) ; Fragata, Carlos (DEP) ; French, Tom (MISC) ; Galvin, Mike (DCR) ;
Gingrich, Valerie (ENV) ; Glenn, Kathryn (ENV) ; Gloria Champion; Robert.Gregory.DOT; Hill,
David (DEP) ; Hopson, Barbara (AGR) ; . Huckery, Pat (MISC) ; Janik, David (DEP) ; Kehoe,
Barbara (ENV) ; Kilmer, Charles; Kinahan, Erin (DOT) ; Kirby, Christine (DEP) ; Laney,
Kristen; Langhauser, Andrea (DEP) ; LaRosa, Thomas (DCR) ; Larson, Richard (DEP) ; Lehan,
Richard (EWE) ; Lofgren, Colleen (ENV) ; Logan, John (FWE) ; Lorion, Barry (DOT) ; Lucien,
Lionel (DOT) ; Lynch, Ben (DEP) ; Marold, Misty-Anne (FWE) ; Mastone, Victor (ENV) ;
maura. zlody@ci.boston.ma.us; McKenna, Stephen (ENV) ; mpillsbury@mapc.org; ocpc; Padula,
Michele (AGR) ; Petitpas, Christian (FWE) ; pincumbe.david@epa.gov; Pioneer Valley Planning
Commission; Connie.Raphael.DOT; Regosin, Jonathan (MISC) ; Reiner.Ed@epamail.epa.gov;
Salomaa, William (DCR) ; Schluter, Eve (EWE) ; Servis, Katie (DOT) ; Simon, Brcna (SEC) ;
Skiba, Catherine (DEP) ; Slagle, David (DEP) ; Sorenson, Elizabeth (DCR) ; Stone, Sharon '
(DEP) ; Strysky, Alexander (DEP) ; Tamul, Stella (DEP) ; Taylor, Jo-Ann;
timmerman.timothy@epa.gov; Tipton, Nathaniel (DCR) ; Trubey, David (ENV) ; Truesdale, Pamela
(DEP) ; 'Van Deusen, Margaret' ; Veinotte, Amanda (MISC) ; VLi@TBHA.org; Warncke, Tracy
(ENV) ; Weinberg, Philip (DEP) ; Winn, Jane; Wixon, Josephine (ENV) ; Worrall, Eric (DEP) ;
Yeo, Jonathan (DCR) t
Cc: joe.freeman@tetratech.com; lliss@rubinrudman.com
Subject: MEPA Scoping Session EEA # 14937 Salem Harbor Station Redevelopment
Importance: Low
EEA No. 14937 : Salem Harbor Station Redevelopment
1
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project consists of demolition of theexisting power plant, site
remediation and construction of a new 630 MW nominal electrical generating facility and
associated infrastructure and equipment. The facility will be fired by natural-gas and
have "quick-start" capability. The new facility will be located on approximately 16 acres
of the 65-acre site.
The project is undergoing MEPA review and is subject to preparation of a Mandatory
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) pursuant to 301 CMR 11. 03 (7) (a) (1) because it requires
a State Agency Action and consists of construction of an electrical generating facility
with a capacity of more than 100 megawatts (MW) . The project requires an Approval to
Construct from the Energy Facilities Siting Board (EFSB) . It requires a Major
Comprehensive Air Plan Approval and Prevention of Significant Deterioration Review, an Air
Operating Permit, a Chapter 91 (c. 91) License, and an Industrial Sewer Use Permit from the
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP) . It requires an Aboveground
Storage Tank Permit from the Department of Public Safety.
The first several pages of the ENF, including the project description, are available
through the following link:
http: //www.env.state.ma.us/mepa/mepadocs/2012/080812em/nps/enf/14937 .pdf
DATE/TIME: Tuesday, August 21 at 9:00 am
LOCATION: Salem City Hall Annex, 3rd Floor (120 Washington Street) .
CONTACT FOR PROJECT INFORMATION: Joe Freeman, Tetra Tech (508) 903-2050
joe. freeman@tetratech.com
MEPA CONTACT: Deirdre Buckley (617) 626-1044 - -
deirdre.buckley@state.ma.us
MEPA COMMENTS ARE DUE ON OR BEFORE AUGUST 28, 2012
Pursuant to the requirements of the Americans With Disabilities Act, this Meeting Notice
is available in alternative formats upon request.
(
2
1
Salem Historical Commission
120 WASHINGTON STREET,SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970
(978)619-5685 FAX (978) 740-0404
August 27, 2012
Brona Simon
Executive Director
Massachusetts Historical Commission
220 Morrissey Boulevard
Boston, MA 02125
RE: MA Historic Rehabilitation Tax Credit Requests for Salem Point Apartments
Dear Ms. Simon,
On behalf of the Salem Historical Commission, I would like to express our support for the North
Shore Community Development Coalition's request for Massachusetts Historic Rehabilitation
Tax Credits to rehabilitate eleven properties located in the Point neighborhood of Salem.
The Point is an early 20`h century neighborhood of multi-family residential structures built after
the Great Salem Fire of 1914. This neighborhood exemplifies the City's efforts after the fire to
reform multi-family housing under the direction of the Salem Rebuilding Commission. The
Point's distinctive Colonial Revival brick multi-family apartment buildings share similar
classical detailing such as decorative brick corbelling and classical cast stone detailing, including
the eleven buildings owned by the North Shore CDC on Peabody, Ward, and Harbor Streets that
are seeking Historic Rehabilitation Tax Credits. The City surveyed the buildings of Ward and
Peabody Streets (Salem Area Form GW) in 1989 and completed a neighborhood survey of the
Point in 2006, identifying the neighborhood as a potential National Register District.
The North Shore CDC's rehabilitation of eleven historic multi-family buildings containing 77
affordable rental units will support several goals of the City: 1) to preserve and revitalize the
historic Point neighborhood and 2) to maintain and improve affordable housing options in Salem.
State Historic Rehabilitation Tax Credits will be critical in reaching these goals. The Salem
Historical Commission urges the Massachusetts Historical Commission to look favorably on the
North Shore CDC's application for Massachusetts Historic Rehabilitation Tax Credits.
Since ly,
/7
res a [[erbert
Chair
RECEIVED
up
JUN 2 8 2012
DEPT.OF PLANNING i
OOMMUM DEVELOPMENT
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth
Massachusetts Historical Commission
June 27, 2012
Lisa B. Mausolf
Preservation Consultant
6 Field Pond Drive
Reading, MA 01867
RE: North Street Fire Station, Salem
Dear Lisa:
MHC staff have completed a review of the National Register nomination that you
prepared for the North Street Fire Station, 142 North Street, Salem, on behalf of the City
of Salem and its-historical commission. The nomination has tentatively been scheduled
for consideration by the State Review Board at its December 12, 2012, meeting. We do
have several comments and questions, which are detailed on the enclosed memorandum.
If you have any questions about any of our comments,please do not hesitate to contact
me. In order for the nomination to be on the December agenda, I will need to receive
your revision no later than late September. The CLG notification process will have to
begin.at that time.
Thank you. We look forward to working with you in completing the listing of the North
Street Fire Station in the National Register of Historic Places. .
Sincerely,
Betsy Friedberg
National Register Director
Massachusetts Historical Commission
Enclosure
Cc: Jane Guy, City of Salem
Jessica Herbert, Chairperson, Salem Historical Commission
220 Morrissey Boulevard, Boston, Massachusetts 02125
(617) 727-8470•Fax: (617) 727-5128
www.sec.state.ma.us/mht
REG L
JUN 21 2012
M-FT OF Pi.,°+NNING&
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts cGA.S� UNITVDEVELOFlw Nl
William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth
Massachusetts Historical Commission
June 18,2012
The Honorable Kimberley Driscoll
Mayor
City of Salem
Salem City Hall
93 Washington Street
Salem,MA 01970
RE: Salem Common Fence, SALEM,MA
Dear Mayor Driscoll:
As Chairman of the Massachusetts Historical Commission, I am pleased to inform you that the above-
mentioned project has been selected for a matching allocation of$40,700 from the Commission's Round
18: Massachusetts Preservation Projects Fund.
Due to the competitive nature of the program and limited funding,your award may differ from your
requested amount. Please note that the grant is subject to reauthorization of the capital accounts and the
availability of sufficient allocated funds. The Office of Administration and Finance must first allocate the
Commission's Round 18 Massachusetts Preservation Project Fund Grants. The Massachusetts Historical
Commission will not be liable for any amount or loss caused by the non-reauthorization or non-allocation
of said funds.
If said funds are reauthorized and allocated,the Commission will provide 50:50 matching funds for the
restoration of the cast iron fence including the fabrication of missing sections.
This allocation is contingent upon the successful execution of the following steps, all of which must be
completed before construction or pre-development work can begin:
1. Consultation with MHC Grants Division and Technical Staff to complete the full plans and
specifications for project work items or to develop the pre-development Request For Proposals
(RFPs). Please note that the MHC may require changes from the scope of work or budget as
presented in your application in order to meet the program guidelines and funding allocation.
Please note that August 31,2012 is the deadline for final approved construction documents or
final approval for pre-development RFPs.
2. Execution of a grant contract with the Massachusetts Historical Commission is a program
requirement. It will define the grant-assisted project under applicable laws and regulations and
include either plans and specifications or an RFP, a budget; and timetable for the full scope of
eligible and approved work items.
220 Morrissey Boulevard, Boston, Massachusetts 02125
(6-17) 727-8470 • Fax: (617) 727-5128
www.sec.state.ma.us/mhc
June 18, 2012 Page 2
3. The grants staff will convene a workshop for Local Project Coordinators (LPCs)and other
project participants on Thursday,July 12,2012 from 2:00 PM to 4:30 PM in the MHC offices at
the Massachusetts Archives Building in Boston. LPC attendance at this scheduled workshop is
a requirement of the program. We also encourage the attendance of other project team
members, such as architects, preservation consultants,or engineers.Please contact the MHC
grants staff to confirm that you will be attending.Also, please come to this meeting prepared
to schedule preliminary site visits with assigned MHC grants staff to finalize a mutually agreeable
scope of work for your MPPF project. These site visits should preferably be scheduled prior to
the end of July and will require the attendance of your architect for all development projects.
Please respond in writing to Brona Simon, Executive Director and State Historic Preservation Officer,
MHC, by July 11,2012 with your intention to accept the grant allocation and meet with appropriate
MHC personnel.
A Local Project Coordinators' Manual will be distributed at the meeting. Directions to the Archives
Building are enclosed with this letter.
The Commission looks forward to working with you toward the successful completion of your project.
We sincerely hope that this grant allocation will help you to achieve your preservation goals.
Sincerely,
a
William Fra cis Galvii
Secretary the Commonwealth
Chairman,Massachusetts Historical Commission
cc: CSa7em 1ti'storical'Commission
Natalie Lovett, Community Development Planner&LPC
�ONOIT�
y< „
�9g�IMIIV9
Salem Historical Commission
120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970
(978)619-5685 FAX(978)740-0404
July 30, 2012
Salem City Council
Salem, MA 01970
RE: Community Preservation Act
At its regular meeting of July 18, 2012, the Salem Historical Commission voted unanimously to
support having the Community Preservation Act(CPA) be placed on the ballot this November.
This would allow for the citizens of Salem to approve or disapprove the legislation.
The members of the Commission believe that the potential income that would be derived from
CPA funds would be a benefit to the city in the face of the several preservation needs, such as the
repair and upkeep of the Salem Common Fence and the improvements needed at Salem City
Hall. This would expand the city's ability to budget for needed capital repairs of our historic
buildings.
If passed, the CPA legislation will assist efforts to preserve our historic resources in these
challenging economic times. We recommend this action in the light of the newly passed changes
to the Community Preservation Act, which now allow cities to use these funds for repairs, along
with allowance of leverage of other funding grants for the city's match.
We thank you for your consideration of this matter.
Sincerely,
jha
I
JtaPel✓&use, Oo&osi, /f�� 021&Y
�E �1 E
Il�cretarry ofr/e Gone w uoea/!/a
APR 19 ZC"Z
DCPT QP Plait,N,V::_.
April 12,2012
C09kmUt.�i Y r Gzl:._..-ri.i:-lJT
Annie C. Harris
Executive Director
Essex National Heritage Commission
221 Essex Street, Suite 41
Salem, MA 01970
Dear Ms. Harris:
The Massachusetts Historical Commission is pleased to recognize your significant
accomplishments in Essex County with a 2012 Massachusetts Historical Commission
Preservation Award. Paul J. McGinley nominated you for this award.
The Massachusetts Historical Commission sincerely appreciates all efforts to preserve the
Commonwealth's valuable historic properties. Your dedicated leadership and extensive
involvement in Essex County's historic preservation activities goes well beyond what is normally
expected. It is for this significant achievement that you have been selected to be honored this year
with an Individual Lifetime Achievement Award at the Massachusetts Historical Commission's
34`h Annual Preservation Awards ceremony.
On behalf of the Massachusetts Historical Commission, I applaud your outstanding contributions
to historic preservation. Details about the ceremony on Wednesday, May 30, 2012, at the
Massachusetts Archives Building will be forthcoming.
Once again, congratulations.
Sincerely,
�r
-
AM FRAN IS GALVIN
ry of the ommonwealth
an, Mass chusetts Historical Commission
xc:Paul J. McGinley
Jessica Herbert, Chair, Salem Historical Commission
Richard Yagjian, President, Essex National Heritage Commission
� i
gONUIT
y� MQ
n
Salem Historical Commission
120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970
(978)619-5685 FAX(978)740-0404
April 18, 2012
Brona Simon
Executive Director
Massachusetts Historical Commission
220 Morrissey Boulevard
Boston, MA 02125
RE: MA Historic Rehabilitation Tax Credit Requests for Salem Point Apartments
Dear Ms. Simon,
On behalf of the Salem Historical Commission, I would like to express our support for the North
Shore Community Development Coalition's request for Massachusetts Historic Rehabilitation
Tax Credits to rehabilitate eleven properties located in the Point neighborhood of Salem.
The Point is an early 20°i century neighborhood of multi-family residential structures built after
the Great Salem Fire of 1914. This neighborhood exemplifies the City's efforts after the fire to
reform multi-family housing under the direction of the Salem Rebuilding Commission. The
Point's distinctive Colonial Revival brick multi-family apartment buildings share similar
classical detailing such as decorative brick corbelling and classical cast stone detailing, including
the eleven buildings owned by the North Shore CDC on Peabody, Ward, and Harbor Streets that
are seeking Historic Rehabilitation Tax Credits. The City surveyed the buildings of Ward and
Peabody Streets (Salem Area Form GW) in 1989 and completed a neighborhood survey of the
Point in 2006, identifying the neighborhood as a potential National Register District.
The North Shore CDC's rehabilitation of eleven historic multi-family buildings containing 77
affordable rental units will support several goals of the City: 1) to preserve and revitalize the
historic Point neighborhood and 2) to maintain and improve affordable housing options in Salem.
State Historic Rehabilitation Tax Credits will be critical in reaching these goals. The Salem
I listorical Commission urges the Massachusetts Historical Commission to look favorably on the
North S re CDC's application for Massachusetts Historic Rehabilitation Tax Credits.
Inerely, �iA
erbertr
CONDIT�
r
A��7MIN6 PA
Salem Historical Commission
120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970
(978)619-5685 FAX(978)740-0404
March 7, 2012
Brona Simon
Executive Director & State Historic Preservation Officer
Massachusetts Historical Commission
220 Morrissey Boulevard
Boston, Massachusetts 02125
RE: Salem Common Fence Restoration
MPPF Grant Funds
Dear Ms. Simon:
The Salem Historical Commission is writing to support the City of Salem's application
for a Fiscal Year 2012 Massachusetts Preservation and Planning Fund grant for the Salem
Common Fence Restoration. The Salem Common is located within both a local and National
Register district and the original wrought iron fence was built in 1850. Tile Salem Common was
the site of the first muster of the East Regiment, Massachusetts Militia, which marked the
beginning of the National Guard of the United States.
Although the fence has seen several restorative efforts since its construction, these repairs
have been piecemeal and inconsistent. With Survey and Planning Grant funds, the City recently
undertook a fence study and restoration plan. This included an existing conditions survey of the
fence, as well as a phased plan for restoration and recommendations for long-term maintenance.
Funding for this phase of the restoration project will enable the creation of fence patterns in order
to replace missing pieces and the full restoration of several sections of fence.
We encourage Massachusetts Historical Commission to continue our partnership in the
restoration of the Salem Common Fence and to look favorably upon this funding request. Thank
you for your consideration.
Sine ly,
Je ca Herbert
Cl it
a
�,� �,��s
� .
F
i
Salem Historical Commission
120 WASHINGTON STREET,SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 -
(978)619-5685 FAX(978) 740-0404
February 22, 2012
Elizabeth Igleheart
National Park Services
History Program
15 State Street
Boston, MA 02109
RE: Salem Maritime National Historic Site
National Register Documentation Update
Dear Ms. Igleheart:
The Salem Historical Commission is in receipt of a copy of the updated National Rcgistcrµ
documentation for the Salem Maritime National Historic Site. Itis the Commission's opinion
that the documentation was very professionally prepared and extremely detailed. The
Commission has no questions or comments.
Thank you for your submission.
Sic rely,
sica Ilerbert
Chair
Cc: Michael Quijano-West, Superintendent
\,layor Kimberley Driscoll
f
`t
��conmtr,�o
tj1 jt
�OtMrne�
Salem Historical Commission
120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970
(978)619-5685 FAX(978) 740-0404
TO: Joint Committee on State Administration and Regulatory Oversight
RE: Bill S.2053. An Act relative to certain projects referred to the Massachusetts historical commission
for consultation
DT: February 22, 2012
Dear Sirs/Madams:
At its regular meeting of February 15, 2012, the Salem Historical Commission unanimously voted to oppose
the passage of Bill 5.2053 and to provide the comments below.
The existing Chapter 9 of the General Laws, in the fourth sentence, states that:
"The state body undertaking the project or the private entity proposing the project shall adopt all
prudent and feasible means to eliminate, minimize, or mitigate the adverse effects."
The proposed bill S.2053 strikes that sentence, and inserts in its place:
"If a determination of adverse effect has been made on any property, site or sttucmue listed in the
state register of historic places, the state body undertaking the project or the private entity proposing
the project shall adopt all prudent and feasible means to eliminate, minimize or mitigate the adverse
effects. If a determination of adverse effect has been made on any property, site or structure not
listed in the state register of historic places, the state body undertaking the project or the private
entity proposing the project shall consider, but need not adopt, the commission's
recommendations to eliminate, minimize or mitigate any adverse effects the commission has
determined to exist, if such recommendations are issued within 30 days of such determination.
Under no circumstances shall such a state body or private entity be required to adopt the
commission's recommendations relative to a site or structure not listed in the state register
ofhistoric p/aces."(emphasis added)
What has changed is that any site or structure that is not listed in the State Regirler o%Eli laic Placer will no
longer be under the oversight of the Massachusetts Historical Commission (NIHC). In the words of the
MHC, "Basically, the bill would reduce the Massachusetts Historical Commission's review of state projects
that have an adverse effect on historic properties (buildings, districts and sites) that axe in MHC's Inventory
but not yet listed in the State Register of Historic Places, by permitting the project proponent to ignore
MHC's recommendations for preservation or mitigation. The bill would also be retroactive to any previous
state project reviews that MHC has done in the past."
The issue to consider is how the majority of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts' historic reSOutcl`5 will be
affected.There are literally thousands of historic sites, buildings and districts in the Commonwealth that are
potentially affected by this bill. For example, in Salem, there are approximately 4,300 buildings that are listed
in MHC's Inventory, while less than 1,400 are listed on the State Register of Historic Places. In Salem alone,
this bill would result in upwards of 2,900 historic buildings, districts and sites losing valuable protection. it
would undermine many of our ongoing preservation efforts that are important to our local economy. Any
'3
SHC, Page 2
2/22/12
impact by state funded or permitted projects will no longer be considered; therefore, there will be no
mitigation of adverse effects that a project may have on our historic resources. The ramifications are
numerous and the consequences can be permanent- such as the hasty demolition of properties by private
developers with no thoughtful consideration as to the preferences of the local community. Without
safeguards, one could also expect an explosion of new cell phone towers on the front of church steeples and
historic hotels.
We strongly urge that Bill 5.2053 be rejected. This bill is obviously meant to address the Meditech
controversy and we oppose any legislation that is clearly site specific. Its passage would negatively impact
the historic preservation activities that have been in place for over 30 years, which have contributed greatly
to the preservation of worthwhile sites and buildings in the Commonwealth, have had an enormous positive
impact on the quality of life of our residents, and have been essential to sustaining a vibrant tourist economy.
Resp fly submitted,
TH SA
I HIST RICAL COMMISSION
Jessica Herbert, Chair
Sent by email to:
Governor Deval Patrick
Joint Committee on State Administration and Regulatory Oversight
Senate Members
Kenneth J. Donnelly, Senate Chair
James T. Welch, Senate Vice Chair
Members
* Susan C. Fargo
*John F. Keenan
Michael J. Rodrigues
* Bruce E. Tarr
House Members
Peter V. Kocot, House Chair
James M. Murphy, House Vice Chair
Members
* David M. Nangle
* Kevin Aguiar
* Michael D. Brady
*Ann-Margaret Ferrante
* Kate Hogan
*Jason M. Lewis
Edward F. Coppinger
* Keiko M. Orrall
* Steven L. Levy
Cc: Secretary William Galvin
Brona Simon, MHC
Historic Salem, Inc.
- 1
W
v�.(oNa1T,1�Qi
i 5r
Salem historical Commission
120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970
(978)619-5685 FAX(978)740-0404
February 22, 2012
Natalie Lovett, Community Development Planner
City of Salem Department of Planning& Community Development
120 Washington Street, 3rd Floor
Salem, MA 01970
RE: Salem Common Fence Study& Restoration Plan
Dear Ms. Lovett:
Thank you and CBI Consulting, Inc. for the recent presentation before the Salem Historical Commission
concerning the Salem Common Fence. The presentation allowed Commission members and the public to
get an update on the project and to provide comment, particularly with regard to the recommended scope
of the first phase of the restoration. In general, the following comments were made:
• It appeared to be a consensus that the fence be completely restored in sections, rather than
undertaking basic repairs to the entire existing fence and rather than filling in missing fence
sections. It was further suggested that restoration begin with the entrances, particularly the
main entrance at Hawthorne Boulevard.
• A major concern is snow being plowed onto the fence by City workers, by private contractors
hired by the City and by private contractors hired by private organizations(i.e. Knights of
Columbus). Ideas generated included placing bollards in locations most effected by plows,
directing City and private truck drivers(via a mailing) not to push snow onto the fence and
considering the establishment fines or other financial disincentive for plow drivers who
damage the fence.
• It was suggested that the City do some marketing to inform the public, particularly residents
around the Common, that it is collecting pieces of the fence that residents may have picked
up, and to direct residents where to drop off the pieces. The collected fence parts should be
carefully inventoried by type(i.e. post, railing, baluster or fragment) and location (i.e. section
14 or 253) for ease in matching elements to sections scheduled for restoration. The fence
parts should be securely stored and each piece recorded when it leaves storage for the
restoration shop.
Again, thank you for the informative presentation and for the opportunity to weigh in on this long-awaited
project.
Sincere ,
Jane A. G
Clerk o- 1e Commission
Cc: Lynn Duncan, Director
I
�� �
� � !
�� r
f f
e .n: r rS. .' E " °-s iz t�rs K>hC+�r'"' 'T 1' ..rt . -ve• "e' `-
.e..I:' ger e 1 �.a ,�Cf "tr i.7 tv $ C3 , EV G e =
. : i. ... . . -_...a.®4,.. J.. .... ea.:�..e3..w..ad
Existing Conditions Report
Salem Common Fence
CBI Job No.: 11195
Existing Conditions
am s CBI Consulting Inc. (CBI)has visited the site of the Salem Common Fence, in Salem,
CRAG E.BARnas Massachusetts,to review the existing conditions of the existing cast-iron fence structure that
MICHAEL S.T£LLER surrounds the park. The perimeter of the common is approximately 1/2 mile long and the
WAYNE R.LAWSON majority of it is enclosed with an approximately five(5)foot tall cast-iron fence. (See Photo
ALBERT E PEREZ
"< While in its current condition,several of the fence panels are missing,the majority are intact
ROBERT`:.'"'LR'" but exhibit deterioration either from exposure to the elements, impact from vehicles,
vandalism,or improper repair techniques.
The fence is uniform,meaning that each of the fence sections(posts and eight foot long infill
fence panel)is the same. Each was created from the same pattern and therefore are very
uniform throughout the assembly. However,there are entrance ways that are different from
the standard fence panel facing Washington Square Streets,and at the corner of Williams
Street and Washington Square. (See Photo#2).
Various entrances throughout the fence structure have been closed off by bollards. Some are
historic(see Photo#3)and some are modern/removable(see Photo#4). The Town of Salem
has installed modern steel pipes with screw tops at these locations, likely because they were
easier and cheaper to procure at the time and possibly after the existing historic bollards were
either stolen or damaged by vehicles.
The typical fence panel consists of a post with a decorative capital, an octagonal shaft,and a
mildly decorative base.(See Photos#5 ). It appears as if these were cast in two(2)
separate pieces. A small "pineapple" exists as a finial at the top of post and is connected to a
steel rod which is threaded at the top and bottom. (See Photo#7). At the top,the pineapple is
connected to the rod and,at the bottom,the threads connect to a steel plate which is cast in or
fastened to the granite base. Tightening the rod attached to the pineapple, secures the post
and creates the structural strength to hold the post in place and keep it from tipping.
Except for the top rail (which is mild steel and bends)(see Photo#8)the fence is comprised
of cast iron elements (which does not bend). The fence panel, located between posts,consists
of a decorative bottom rail which is fairly ornate(see Photo#9)and accepts the cast-iron
vertical balusters that penetrate the top rail and are capped by two(2)different spearhead
designs(see Photo#10). The balustrades are also two(2)different designs corresponding to
the spearheads.
There are only a few non-uniform fence sections.They contain swinging gates. The support
posts are granite and the gates match the fence. The steel is set into recesses created in the
BOSTON granite. Unfortunately,the steel has rusted and when it rusts,it expands. The pressure of the
MIAMI i rusted steel caused the edge of the granite recess to chip or"spall". (See Photo#17).
Cast-iron is an alloy with a high carbon content(at least 1.7%and usually 3.0 to 3.7%)that
617•2sn.8977 makes it more resistant to corrosion. While it is extremely easy to cast and can take almost
617-464,2971 any shape in which a mold can be created, it does not lend itself to fine detail and it has
structural strength issues. It is extremely strong in compression and has been used since the
s
O B I C O N S U, k T I N G N C,
Page 2
Salem Common Fence
Existing Conditions Report
January 20,2012
CBI Job# 11195
1800's to create columns and entire building fagades that were also structural. It is,however,
not good in tension and is extremely brittle.
Until recently,you could not weld to cast-iron.In the modern era, new welding rods
(Certanium)have been developed that take advantage of the cast-iron metallurgical properties
and, if used carefully, can weld pieces of cast-iron together or pieces of mild steel to the cast-
iron. It is important to note,that like welding with mild steel,the weld is always stronger
than the parent material. Unfortunately,with cast-iron this is even more true, as any force
applied to the cast material, adjacent to a weld, will snap the cast-iron on the other side of the
weld location. In some cases the top rail was not long enough to connect to the post and an
extension was attached in mild steel.(See Photo#11).
Typically,the top rail is welded directly to the support post. (See Photo#12). A sealant,
which appears to be black silicone,was applied over the welds in an effort to smooth out the
surface and not trap any moisture. Unfortunately,the sealant is, in fact,trapping moisture and
rust has formed around the welds.(See Photo#13).
Traditionally,cast-iron material is bolted together using blind or countersunk fasteners. Cast-
iron can be drilled and tapped and threaded fasteners used to connect pieces together. In
modern times,the process of drilling and tapping is costly and with the advent of welding
techniques,this process is not often employed. However, it would be more historically
correct and in some cases would take advantage of the materials properties.
The existing fence has been created in different eras and it appears as if different molds were
used at different times to create the entire fence and or replacement pieces. Either that or the
quality of the casting varies. New molds can be created from existing piece of cast-iron.
However, cast-iron shrinks approximately 1/8 inch per foot. So if new cast-iron is to be cast
from molds of existing pieces,the designer and contractor must take this shrinkage into
consideration and adjust accordingly.
The finish of the existing fence is black paint. We have not tested the paint so we are unclear
as to whether not lead paint exists throughout. However it is likely. Nevertheless, because
the various fence elements are deteriorated and rust exists the finish must be replaced.
Paint cannot be applied to the cast-iron until it has been properly prepared. We recommend
blasting the existing material with an abrasive material such as walnut shells which will
remove the existing coatings down to the bare metal but not affect or damage the existing
parent material. A test can be done using other abrasives such as"black beauty"if it is found
that it does not damage the original material. Some preservationists would be horrified
knowing that you were sandblasting this material and some would feel that creating a mild
"tooth"with the sandblasting would help better create a bond with the new paint system
which would make up for a perceived"damage"of material by the sandblasting.
It is most important to remove any loose material and,especially, al I the existing rust and
corrosion on the base metal before painting. Soon after,the clean cast-iron must be painted
in order to avoid the potential of"blush rust"which could occur in humid conditions creating
rust on the surface the material before the paint is applied. There is a time constraint and
urgency to getting paint onto the metal immediately after blasting with any abrasive.
The cast-iron can be finished in two ways. The first option is to paint the material with a high
r n_
X41
CAI C;b N S U L- T ( NG I N-C _
Page 3 . .. .._..-- ..
Salem Common Fence
Existing Conditions Report
January 20,2012
CBI Job# 11195
tech,durable coating system. We recommend a zinc rich primer,followed by an epoxy
intermediate coat,finished with a urethane top coat which gives it its UV protection and
color. We suggest that each coat of paint be a different color so that if the paint is ever
damaged the contractor can tellwhichcoats are still intact and which need to be replaced.
Also, by using different color coats, it is easy for the contractor, and the architect,to visually
inspect the coverage of the paint before the next coat or type of paint is applied.
Another option is to galvanize the metal using a either a hot dip system or an electro galvanic
system. Hot dip is more durable. The drawback is that of the hot dip galvanizing process
sometimes deforms the metal material and this is problematic with cast-iron as it could break.
The electrostatic galvanizing process involves introduction of electric charge and when this
paint is sprayed into the air,around the material, it is attracted to the electrified metal. This
often creates a very uniform finish,however,touching up this finish in the field if damaged,
is very difficult in the future. It also makes temporary protection of the new paint extremely
important during transport to the site and,again, if it is damaged, it is very difficult to touch-
up.
We did not observe any accommodation for expansion throughout the entire fence except
where sections of fencing were missing. Assuming they are replaced,there still is no way for
the fence structure to accommodate movement from heat or cold. The top rail of the most
fence sections is welded solidly to post. There exists a small bracket on each side of most
posts which helps to support the top rail. In some cases the top rail is bolted into this tab (see
Photo#14),however,most conditions are welded. It would be possible to physically cut the
top rail from the post, create a slotted hole in the top rail and drill and tap into the bracket
creating a detail for expansion on each side of the post throughout the fence.
Each post bears on a granite base. Most bases are in good condition. (See Photo 415). The
major deficiency is a cracked or broken corner which, in most cases, should not be repaired.
There are a few concrete bases(see Photo 416)which are deteriorated and should be replaced
with granite to match.
There is always a debate as to whether or not this type of project and this type of fence
material should be repaired on site, in the field,or removed to the shop. Because each fence
panel is welded to the post,removal of the fence would involve a tremendous amount of
destructive removals at each post.Therefore,new connections would have to be made, either
by welding or drilling and tapping. Removing the fence in its entirety to the shop would
provide uniform conditions where workers are in a controlled environment. This creates a
more comfortable,clean, wind free,efficient work environment where various shop tools can
be employed including overhead cranes,infills,clamps,etc.
Not surprisingly,there are several unusual conditions:A tree is growing around one of the
posts. (See Photo#18). Branches and roots also affect other posts of the fence. At a missing
section of the fence, a support has been installed. It is unclear if the section was missing or if
it was removed for this purpose.(See Photo#19).
u sps:4 .a u•i i_ �. ,�_ -.. a Nfl r �# n
C h i C'O�N S U L T ) N G }I N C s.
Page 4
Salem Common Fence
Existing Conditions Report
January 20,2012
CBI Job# 11195
da Recommendations
In general,our recommendations for individual components are as follows:
1. Most granite bases should remain.Minor chips look"historic". Granite bases with
severe breaks that look"damaged" should be replaced.
2. All concrete bases should be replaced with granite to match the existing.
3. We have proven that broken cast iron can be welded back together, but the cost is
usually greater than replacement in kind.
4. There are few broken support posts of which the broken part is still on site, is
attached or is available. We recommend that instead of trying to repair the post that
the broken portion be replaced.
5. Broken bottom rails,where all the pieces are still on site should be welded back
together,as this is an expensive item to replace.
6. Broken balustrades should be replaced,again because they are too costly to repair.
7. The soil around the fence should be cut back, away from the fence,so it can breathe.
8. Expansion connections should be installed at each connection to a support post.
However, if there are budget restraints,the expansion detail could be installed on
every third post.
9. We recommend that the repair of the granite spalls at the entrance swinging gates be
a low priority. However,when that work occurs,the granite should be repaired with
granite Dutchmen in material to match the existing and the steel should be removed
from the granite and new stainless steel inserts installed to remove this hazard.
10. The fence should be repainted on a regular basis. If the entire system is sandblasted
and recoated with a high tech paint system,then repainting should only be needed
periodically. We would recommend that touch-up occur on a yearly basis, major
touch-up occur every five(5)years,and recoating occur every ten(10)years. The
recoating would normally involve the urethane top coat unless any of the undercoat
layers were damaged. In that case,they would have to be repaired and restored layer
by layer.
The various overall recommendations that follow relate to the budget available for repair and
restoration of the fence.
A. For example, if a budget was available for full restoration,we would recommend that
the entire fence be carefully dismantled and removed to the shop for repair of broken
and deformed pieces,replacement of missing pieces, preparation of the surface by
removing existing paint and rust,painting with a high tech coating system, and
transporting back to the site where the entire assembly is reassembled using new
expansion joint connections at each post.
Ell
4
C B.I C G N S L'- L T N G i N
Pages
Salem Common Fence
Existing Conditions Report
January 20,2012
CBT Job# 11195
However,we know only about$100,000 will be available to begin repairs so funds must be
expended in a more economical way. The fence can be repaired and renovated in several
ways.
B. One option would be to fill in missing areas of fencing by fabricating new pieces to
match the existing using the existing patterns in the possession of the City of Salem.
Therefore,at the end of that phase of the project,much of the fence would be intact.
C. Another option would involve only the replacement and repair of missing or broken
elements throughout the fence system,within the budget.
D. Yet another option would be to select the first 50 sections and restore them fully as a
"phase"so that we would know that that first section of fencing was complete.
It is unlikely, at this time,that a major budget will be available to address the fence in a
global manner. If that is the case,the City must decide where their priorities lie. Is the
priority to replace missing sections,or is it to restore the existing fence sections that exist, in
place? This fence is not in place as a true security measure. Nor is there a life safety problem
with falling(although if any sections are ready to topple over,they should be removed). The
key to the decision-making lies greatly on the amount of money available.
Historically, fences are the poor stepchild of facility elements in that no one lives at the fence
or has an office at the fence. Fences are usually left as decorative landscape elements and
given very little thought. However,the historic importance of this fence is significant and
retaining the existing historic fabric should be a high priority for the Owner.
C:'B I -C O N S U U 7 1 N t5 I N C
Page 6
Salem Common Fence
Existing Conditions Report
January 20,2012
CBI Job# 11195
Photo No.
ygtix
# v
2. IF yr
aS�T.q p: ,Af
t
s �
0 b 9 S I
� �.0
C 9 :7� C O:N S U,.L T I N IG I N , C .
Page 7 . . . . . _
a Salem Common Fence
Existing Conditions Report _
January 20,2012
CBI Job 9 11195
Bill
r M
M '
,
5.
M `!� !i 4
NO SJ
Sol
si AytiR° ^g��++�✓y
d
7
a'. ry
•j"� #�.' .do- �� 'Y�' �""\
ytp r* 4+ ti�.�i
�I
h t'W r
jc
__ _ __
. . .,
" �
.. .
;�;, �
>:. t �-�
�4�?;q $¢ �,.? g..
� h �; , ��
t
a
� �� ^`
�� 'fi
��
i
� � p.�I 6 1� �e(JJ}��*i,Y��
# j
FN
t
��
t
� `t 4
t
�r�
e ,Y
y��� e
��N
l .
�F. 1 4
1 a �i; y h�`k+� u - �,. ry"�`�8�..w,
�� u :� �`tX� J T �y yi
a � � ';
vi
a � �@�a�.,a' r.
}d'.,
'®
r
Page 10 „„,_. .. _....
Salem Common Fence
Existing Conditions Report
January 20,2012
CBI Job# 11195 -
i a{
=qi
���■�rv. lyd'ry„iry..
F F A
«
}i I
10.
.., M, ",v':'T«`-1'm`S..d�.i6+ q'< +c_-�«-.*..,nlY,;• ",
11.
x i ins
C.B.'10 C 6 N S U L T I Nkt C+a. I N C
Page 11 . .. _.. .. ,
Salem Common Fence
Existing Conditions Report
January 20,2012
CBI Job# 11195 -
i
a
J Ikl kj
12.
F
* r
s u
13.
14.
0 & ID @ 1
k�j .
C & 1 t, 0N SU .I. T I .NG 3N
Page 12
Salem Common Fence
Existing Conditions Report
January 20,2012
CBI Job# 11195
h
s:
15. w e,
i
I
N
W MS 14p1�� Ht�l�}
16.
u
�4. s
17.
fa.oi.
G S i C 0-N.5 U L T:IYN C 'A N C .
Page 13
Salem Common Fence
Existing Conditions Report
January 20,2012
CBI Job# 11195
I ML
4
a
z
a s! '
r° t
18.
i
19.
gym • : m (I�
y k
e
C: O N S U IL T .I 'V G.. € h. C -
Page.14 ._- _.__ .....
Salem Common Fence
Existing Conditions Report
January 20,2012
CBI Job# 11195
� 1
A
fib,
MST/lag
11195 Existing Conditions Report 01-16-12.docx
�i�d
gONWE
3 y �
Salem Historical Commission
120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970
(978)619-5685 FAX(978) 740-0404
February 22, 2012
William Francis Galvin, Chairman
Massachusetts Historical Commission
The Massachusetts Archives Building
220 Morrissey Boulevard
Boston, MA 02125
Re: 2012 MHC Preservation Awards: Individual Lifetime Achievement Category
Dear Mr. Galvin:
I have known Annie C. Harris for nearly 30 years and have worked with her on several project over this time. It
is my pleasure to support her nomination for a 2012 Preservation Award recognition in the category of Individual
Lifetime Achievement. As founder of The Salem Partnership and Executive Director of the Essex National
Heritage Commission, Annie has served our region and the City of Salem for over twenty years as a preservation
activist and educator. Annie served the Salem Historical Commission for 12 years, six of those as Chair, lending
her considerable expertise and experience to our efforts.
Annie has demonstrated her passion for historic preservation as an early leader of The Salem Partnership, where
she worked along with other community stakeholders to renovate and reinvigorate Salem's sagging historic
resources, including the Salem Maritime National Historic Site. Annie demonstrated her passion for historic
preservation by helping the National Park Service acquire the St. Joseph's Polish Club, providing needed facilities
for maritime educational programming, site maintenance and administrative offices in an authentic and
appropriate historic building. She also led a community-based effort to rehabilitate the historic Salem Armory
into a premier Regional Visitor Center.
As her work with the Salem Partnership evolved into the formation of the Essex National Heritage Commission,
Annie is credited for establishing a regional organizational structure that has helped to preserve historically
significant structures and resources within Essex County. Her efforts have combined to create numerous
programmatic initiatives that educate the public, advocate a preservation ethic on behalf of non-profit entities,
municipalities and residents, and demonstrate a faithful regional commitment to preservation and resource
stewardship.
Annie's efforts have yielded considerable success across Essex County. Under her leadership, initiatives like the
Partnership Grants for Historic Preservation, the Historical Records Council and Historic Faqade Easements and
the Heritage Landscape Inventory have helped to identify, protect and steward our incredible yet fragile heritage
resources. Her efforts have had a profound impact on our region, and her work is recognized at the state and
national I Is. She is rightfully deserving of the Massachusetts Historical Commission's 2012 Preservation
Awar of Individual Lifetime Achievement.
nc rely,
es ert
lair
Jane.Guy
From: Deb Payson [dpayson@essexheritage.org]
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 10:16 AM
To: Jane Guy
Subject: Letter of Support
Attachments: MHC 2012 letter of support from Salem Historical Commission.docx
Dear Ms. Guy:
I am writing on behalf of Annie Harris, Executive Director of the Essex National Heritage
Commission. One of our Board Members, Paul McGinley, has nominated Annie for the 2012
MHC Preservation Award (Lifetime Achievement) and we were hoping you might consider
writing a letter of support.
For your use I have attached a sample/draft that you may use as a point of reference. We are
hoping to obtain all the letters by February 28.
Please let me know if you are interested in sending in a letter.
Thank you for your consideration!
Warm regards, Deb
Deb Pesanti Payson
Director of Development & Communications
Essex National Heritage Commission
978-740-0444
www.essexheritage.org
The mission of the Essex National Heritage Commission is to preserve, promote and
enhance the historic, cultural, and natural resources of Essex County, MA.
2/15/2012
a
DRAFT
February 28, 2012
William Francis Galvin, Chairman
Massachusetts Historical Commission
The Massachusetts Archives Building
220 Morrissey Boulevard
Boston, MA 02125
Re: 2012 MHC Preservation Awards: Individual Lifetime Achievement Category
Dear Mr. Galvin:
I am pleased to support the nomination of Annie C. Harris founderof The Salem Partnership and
Executive Director of the Essex National Heritage Commission, for 2012 Preservation Award
recognition in the category of Individual Lifetime Achievement.
Annie has served our regionand the City of Salem for over twenty years as a preservation activist
and educator. Annie served the Salem Historical Commission for 12 years, six of those as Chair,
lending her considerable expertise and experience to our efforts. Annie has demonstrated her
passion for historic preservation as an early leader of The Salem Partnership, where she worked
along with other community stakeholders to renovate and reinvigorate Salem's sagging historic
resources, including the Salem Maritime National Historic Site. Annie demonstrated her passion
for historic preservation by helping the National Park Service acquire the St. Joseph's Polish
Club, providing needed facilities for maritime educational programming, site maintenance and
administrative offices in an authentic and appropriate historic building. She also led a
community-based effort to rehabilitate the historic Salem Armory into a premier Regional Visitor
Center.
As her work with the Salem Partnership evolved into the formation of the Essex National
Heritage Commission, Annie is credited for establishing a regional organizational structure that
has helped to preserve historically significant structures and resources within Essex County. Her
efforts have combined to create numerous programmatic initiatives that educate the public,
advocate a preservation ethic on behalf of non-profit entities,municipalities and residents, and
demonstrate a faithful regional commitment to preservation and resource stewardship.
Annie's efforts have yielded considerable success and across Essex County. Under tier leadership,
initiatives like the Partnership Grants for Historic Preservation, the Historical Records Council
and Historic Fapade Easements and the Heritage Landscape Inventory have helped to identify,
protect and steward our incredible yet fragile heritage resources.
Her efforts have had a profound impact on our region,and her work is recognized at the state and
national levels. She is rightfully deserving of the Massachusetts Historical Commission's 2012
Preservation Award of Individual Lifetime Achievement.
Sincerely,
Jane A. Guy
Salem Historical Commission
ONUIT�„1Q
Salem Historical Commission
120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970
(978)619-5685 FAX(978)740-0404
6
January 18, 2012
Michael Steinitz
Director, Preservation Planning Division
Massachusetts Historical Commission
Massachusetts Archives Building
220 Morrissey Boulevard
Boston,MA 02125
RE: FY2012 Survey and Planning Grant
Dear Mr. Steinitz: '
The Salem Historical Commission is in full support of the City of Salem's
application for Survey and Planning Grant funding for the Historic Signage:
Update of Historic Interpretive Panels in Salem Neighborhoods. One of Salem's
historic preservation goals is to increase public awareness, understanding, and
appreciation of the City's historic resources and their relationship to the
surrounding neighborhoods. Updating the historic interpretive panels would be
an important step towards achieving this goal.
We strongly recommend that this application be fully funded. Thank you for
your consideration.
Sincerely, G
J ca Herbert
air
J
Michael Stein itz Due:November 21,2011
Director,Preservation Planning Division No faxed or emailed applications
Massachusetts Historical Commission
220 Morrissey Boulevard
Boston,MA 02125-3314
FY 2012 LETTER OF INTENT TO APPLY FOR SURVEY AND PLANNING FUNDS
1. PROJECT TITLE:North Street Fire Station Conditions and Restoration Plan and Historic Signage
2. COMMUNITY/COMMUNITIES: City of Salem
3. APPLICANT ORGANIZATION: Department of Planning and Community Development
_ ADDRESS: 120 Washington Street, 3rd Floor
Salem,MA 01970
PHONE: (978)619-5685 FAX: (978)740-0404
EMAIL: nioveft@salem.com
salem.com
4. LOCAL PROJECT COORDINATOR:Natalie Lovett
ADDRESS: 120 Washington Street,3`d Floor
Salem,MA 01970
PHONE: (978)619-5685 FAX: (978)740-0404
EMAIL: nlovett@salem.com
5. AMOUNT OF FUNDING REQUESTED: $12,500 (50%)
LOCAL SHARE: $12,500 (50%)
TOTAL PROJECT COST: $25,000 (100%)
6. PRELIMINARY BUDGET AND MATCHING SHARE INFORMATION(ESTIMATED):
LOCAL SHARE SOURCE: Community Development Block Grant(CDBG)
CASH AMOUNT: $12,500
IN-KIND SERVICES (paid employee on staff): $
DONATED VOLUNTEER TIME: $
7. AUTHORIZED APPLICANT SIGNATURE:
Lynn Duncan
(NAME,PLEASE PRINT)
Director,Department of Community Development
3
(TITLE) (DATE)
8. NARRATIVE STATEMENT(ATTACH A ONE-PAGE,TYPED NARRATIVE STATEMENT):
Explain in a concise statement how the proposed project relates to past,current,and future preservation activity in the
community, region or state.Describe how the results of the proposed project will be incorporated into the community,
region,or state planning process, and the extent to which the results will be made available and used by the general
public.Provide any other information on the special qualities of the project,which makes it deserving of funding.
Please address the five Selection Criteria for Pre-Applications. (See Guidelines Item F.)
FY12 SURVEY AND PLANNING GRANT: NARRATIVE STATEMENT
The City of Salem proposes two projects for the FY2012 MHC Survey and Planning Grant.
The first project is to develop a Conditions and Restoration Plan for the North Street Fire Station. This fire station,designed by Salem architect
William D. Dennis,is the oldest fire station in Salem still serving its original purpose. As a historic one-engine firehouse, it is important that the
North Street Fire Station be distinguished and preserved as a unique historic resource,while also being renovated in a way that allows it to
continue to operate and accommodate modern fire protection services. Recently,the City has attained the services of a preservation
consultant to prepare a nomination for listing the property on the National Register of Historic Places. As of this writing, a draft survey form
and draft nomination form have been submitted to MHC. The scope of work includes performing a detailed survey of the exterior of the building
and developing a conditions report,illustrated with photographs. The survey of the building's historic and present condition will lead to
recommendations for repairs and restoration.Restoration recommendations,with cost estimates,will be prioritized into a list according to
emergency,short-term, and long-term needs. In addition,the Plan will include a maintenance section that expands upon the Salem Historic
Preservation Maintenance Plan from 1998,with recommendations on preventative measures and long-term maintenance, as well as
associated cyclical costs for these procedures.The City of Salem would like to ensure that the historical features of the North Street Fire
Station are appropriately repaired and/or restored.The City envisions using Conditions and Restoration Plan for the North Street Fire Station to
assist in the preparation of bid plans and specifications for the first phase of priority repairs and restoration.
The second project is to prepare an update of the interpretive history panels located in several of Salem's historic neighborhoods. In the 1970s,
the City of Salem,in partnership with Historic Salem, Inc.,erected sign panels in several of Salem's neighborhoods in order for residents and
visitors to learn the history of these historic areas. Overtime,these signs have become out-of-date and dilapidated. In recent years,the City
utilized Community Development Block Grant funds to create 3 new interpretive panels along the South River Harborwalk.The City is also in
the process of updating two additional signs in the Point Neighborhood and South Salem. For this proposal,the City wishes to hire a consultant
to update the historical text,design,and layout for the remaining 4+panels.With this work completed,the City will then locate funding to
fabricate and erect the new interpretive panels.
Applicability to Selection Criteria
1. Demonstration that the proposed project will represent a public benefit by supporting local and state historic preservation
priorities established by MHC and the local historic commission.
The North Street Fire Station will be the first property in North Salem to achieve National Register of Historic Places status. Identified in the
City's Preservation Master Plan, North Salem was former farmland that was developed for housing,following the implementation of the
streetcar line along North Street,in the last decades of the 1901 century and early 20'r century. The North Street Fire Station was built to
meet the needs of these new housing developments and the multiple tanneries and leather factories located along the North River.
The interpretive panels are important reminders of the extensive and diverse history of Salem's various neighborhoods. Both state and local
historic preservation priorities include protecting historic resources through public awareness,understanding, and appreciation.The
interpretive panels highlight the rich history of each of the Salem neighborhoods,and reinforce the value that these neighborhoods add to
the City's economic and cultural vitality.
2. Demonstration that a funding match is in place or will be in place by the time of the grant award,and demonstrated
understanding of the reimbursement nature of funds.
The City will use the Community Development Block Grant as the funding match for this project and these funds are in place. The DPCD
has extensive experience with Survey and Planning grants and has managed numerous state and federal grants successfully over the
years.
3. Demonstration of financial need,i.e.that other funding has been sought and is not available and that the proposed activities
could not be undertaken without Survey and Planning Grant support.
Due to a funding cap on the amount of CDBG funds that may be utilized for administrative and planning purposes,the city is not able to
support the full cost of these projects.The city will not be able to undertake these projects without MHC funding.
4. Demonstration that the proposed activity can realistically be completed within the budget and timeframe of the project.
As evidenced in previous Survey&Planning Grants that the City of Salem DPCD has managed,the City of Salem has the ability to
complete the project within budget and within the timeframe required.
5. MHC will consider geographic distribution in its invitation for full application.MHC will also give special consideration to first-
time applicants.
Salem is a certified local government located on the North Shore with extensive historic resources(the third largest number of properties
included in the state's Inventory of Historic Assets of the Commonwealth). Many of these resources are essential to Salem residents'and
the region's economy and quality of life.
C
-k hs
i'
C �
_ Ig
}:
. 1�9
r i
r-
T �� $. p.
A g WA,U
4t till-,
7W I
ari
��N� #J+
i W�
Fid
Atl1 u
i"
i"
`b t Yr t I.