SALEM HISTORICAL COMMISSION MINUTES Shc��—. ��iSZ'vr: c
Clim w�. �S-v�
�•-� n v��J - - - --
� �� _
. ,
�.
40 January 6, 1993, Page I . k
SALEM HISTORICAL COMMISSION
MINUTES
JANUARY 6, 1993 y3
A regular meeting of the Salem Historical Commission was held 'bn
Wednesday, January 6, 1993 at 7 : 30 p.m. at One Salem Green.
Present were Chairman Harris and Messrs . Carr, Cook, Oedel, Casey
and Slam and Ms . Guy.
> ,
Chairman Harris called the meeting to order.
Ms . Guy stated that there were no applications received for the
January 20, 1993 meeting. Therefore, there will not be a meeting
on January 20, 1993 meeting unless the Commission continues any of
this meeting' s applications to that date. .�
6 Federal Court ' s
In continuation from a previous meeting, Harlan and Joanna Peabody
presented an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness for
the relocation of the carriage house from 6 Federal Court. to the
premises of 95/97 Federal Street.
• Chairman Harris read a letter to the Commission from Jessica
Herbert of 95 Federal Street which withdrew her approval to
relocate the carriage house to her property at this time.
Atty. Robert McCann, representing the Peabodys, stated that he has
spoken to Ms . Herbert and stated that she wants to wait on Historic , -
Commission approval until financing and agreements with the. other
condo owners has been arranged.
Mr. Carr stated that the Peabodys could either withdraw or the 1
Commission could vote down the application without prejudice.
Atty. McCann stated that the Peabodys hereby withdraw the
application and Mr. Peabody so signed the application as withdrawn.
82 Derby Street
In continuation from a previous meeting on their request for ak
Certificate of Appropriateness, Century North Shore Bank and Trust
Company was represented by Janet Andrews, Realtor; Robert `"' ' •
Harrington, Carpenter; and Ray Noyes, Sheet Metal Contractor.
There were no drawings presented for the treatment of the false
chimney to cover the roof exhaust as required by the Certificate of
Appropriateness issued December 3, 1992 .
Mr. Noyes stated that there is an example of a similar chimney
treatment on White Street that he could take a picture of.
PW, -,':#
. January 6, 1993, Page 2
x r
Mr. Carr suggested that a Commission member be delegated to handle,
the detail approval .
Mr. Harrington stated that he suggested to the bank the thay
reclapboard the entire rear of the building (3 sides) .
Mr. Carr stated that he, Mr. Noyes, Mr. Harrington, Ms . Andrews and
2 bank representatives had a site visit at the property recently.
Mr. Carr provided his "wish list" that was discussed ,at the site
visit:
REAR: Reclapboard rear addition ( 3 sides) 4-4 1/2" exposure, r ,
grade 1, redwood, finish side out. Replicate ,corner
boards . Finish door trim. Removal of roof over stair
(roof to remain over rear deck) . Restore ornamental ar
corner posts . Replace wood railing on deck and stairs . l;. w
New bulkhead in wood.
Mr. Harrington stated that he would provide a drawing and that the,
ballasters would be 6" on center.
Mr. Casey stated that the ballasters should be turned to match the
posts and painted.
• Chairman Harris suggested that the bulkhead be enclosed under the
stair.
Mr. Casey asked about the supports for the porch. Mr. Carr stated ~
that they are now metal and that the bank would propose angle beam.
Mr. Carr felt that the existing is a better treatment than angle
beam.
Mr. Harrington stated that they would replace all the aluminum
gutters with wood with galvanized coming down. Mr. Carr stated
that the Commission would want the galvanized boxed in.
Mr. Carr continued:
BECKET ST.
SIDE : Remove Maytag sign. Small vent to basement at base to
remain.
Mr. Carr also suggested the removal of the band of shingles above
the storefront in order to have a uniform, painted brick facade.
Ms . Andrews stated that she would talk to the bank about it.
Chairman Harris asked if there was anything that could be done y
about the picture windows . She suggested that the two picture
windows be removed from the rear and three windows that match those
on the second floor be added. Ms . Andrews will also talk to the
bank about these windows .
T a
January 6, 1993, Page 3
Mr. Casey was concerned with the mixture of windows ( 1 over 1, 2
over 1 in plastic and wood) throughout the building. Mr. Casey
felt they should uniformly be 2 over 1 . y
z„
Mr. Carr continued: `
DERBY, ST.
SIDE: Remove lights . Small basement window to remain.
Threshold replaced. Trim replaced on 2nd floor.
SIDE TO
78 DERBY: Brick over middle window on first floor of rear ell .
Mr. Carr stated that he preferred the beige color on the building
to the body color approved.
Mr. Carr stated that they bank should reclapboard the shed-like
addition on roof to match building. ✓A`' `*`a
Chairman Harris stated that the Commission needs a design on • the'' ".
rail .
Messrs . Carr, Casey and Oedel did not feel the bulkhead should ,�be
• closed in. ;
Mr. Carr made a motion to amend the Certificate of Appropriateness ;
issued to add the above list of requirements and to delegate a ,_
member of the Commission to follow-up on the details of the work'.' !?
Mr. Carr volunteered to be the Commission's delegate. Chairman
Harris suggested that Mr. Hedstrom assist Mr. Carr.
Mr. Carr stated that the vent enclosure ( false chimney) should be
stucco, not clapboard.
Mr. Oedel seconded the motion. -
Mr. Tim Masters, an abutter, stated that some of the bricks on the
building need repointing.
Mr. Carr stated that "repointing bricks as necessary" should be
,�• ��`';
added to the list of work. }'
All were in favor and the motion so carried.
Mr. Harrington will provide Mr. Carr with drawings .
Mr. Carr felt that the removal of two picture windows on first
floor of the rear addition and the replacement with 3 windows to
line up with the 3 windows on second floor should be a requirement
of any Certificate.
w
y
January 6 , 1993,, Page 4
• y
1
92 Federal Street
Richard Quirk presented an application for a Certificate of
Appropriateness for the replacement of side stairs at 92 Federal
Street and the painting of the stairs to match the house. Tte• work
has already been completed with the exception of the painting.
Mr. Quirk stated that the existing stairs were not torn down; but
repaired and that his insurance company required the addition of
railings . Mr. Quirk stated that carpenter ants were found in the
posts of the stairs by the driveway. Mr. Quirk stated that
ballasters were added and that he replaced the treads and
kickboards but not the stringers .
Mr. Carr stated that he did not have a problem with thestairs
provided they were painted. 'F
; 3
Mr. Quirk stated that he has already purchased a stain for pressure,
treated wood.
Mr. Carr stated that he had a problem with the rail .
Mr. Quirk stated that it was changed from 2 x 4 to 2 x 6 .
• Mr. Carr urged a different railing treatment. '
Mr. Slam made a motion to approve the application as submitted .
provided the stairs are painted. There was no second.
Ms . Guy showed Mr. Quirk the Commission' s sample rail design.
Mr. Carr made a motion to approve the application as submitted with
the exception that the rail treatment be delegated to Mr. Carr and r
Mr. Cook for final design approval . Mr. Cook seconded the motion.
All were in favor and the motion so carried.
316 Essex Street
In continuation from a previous meeting, the First Church of Salem
presented an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness for s
the construction of a handicap ramp at 316 Essex Street. There was
no one present on behalf of the First Church of Salem.
Mr. Carr stated that he attended the site visit and it was
determined that a ramp as presented in drawings at the last meeting
would not be needed. Mr. Carr stated that there is an entrance
behind the tower that has a lift inside. There is a 3" granite
step from the outside where a small ramp could be installed.
SMr. Carr made a motion to deny the application for a Certificate of
Appropriateness and to approve a Certificate of Non-Applicability
January 6 , 1993,. Page 5
• f
a
for the installation of a concrete ramp at the entrance on easterly
facade, just behind the tower, to join the existing granite step.
The ramp should not exceed 3 ' in length.
Chairman Harris stated that it is not the Henny-Penny entrance. '
Mr. Oedel seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so
carried.
1 Chestnut Street
Dr. C. J. Mekelatos submitted applications for a Certificate of
Appropriateness, Hardship and Non-Applicability to install aluminum
gutters to the house. The applications noted that the wooden
gutters have been repaired three times but persist in breaking
down. There was no one present to represent the applicant. a
Chairman Harris questioned where the aluminum gutters would be
going.
Mr. Cook stated that he will contact Dr. Melekatos ' daughter.
Mr. Oedel made a motion to approve a Certificate of Non-
Applicability for the repair/replacement of the existing wooden
gutters and to continue the other applications until the meeting of
February 3, 1993 . Mr. Carr seconded the motion. All were in favor
and the motion so carried. "
Ms . Guy will give the Certificate to Mr. Cook to hand deliver.
54 Turner Street
In continuation from a previous meeting, the House of Seven Gables
Settlement Association applied for a Certificate of Appropriateness t
for the partial demolition of the existing Visitors ' Center, Coffee
Shop and toilets . Construction of new Educational Center, Museum
Shop and Cultural space as an addition to the remaining portion of
the existing Visitors ' Center. Kitchen addition to the Retire
Beckett House. The applicant ' s were not present.
Mr. Carr motioned to continue the application. Mr. Oedel seconded .
the motion. All were in favor and the motion so carried.
10 Hamilton Street
Barry Paul submitted an application for a Certificate of Non-
Applicability to replace the existing sheet metal flashing/roofing
over the porch with same at 10 Hamilton Street.
Mr. Carr made a motion to approve the application as submitted.
Mr. Oedel seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so
r
w
w
• January 6, 1993, .Page 6 .b
i
carried.
Chairman Harris stated that the Certificate should indicate that no
additional drip edge is to show. $
180 Federal Street
Edward Crowley submitted an application for a Certificate of Non-
Applicability to reroof the front of the gambrel roof with the same
and to repair/replace the sills .
Mr. Oedel made a motion to approve a Certificate oil Non-
Applicability to replace the existing black asphalt roof on''the
front of the house with a new black asphalt roof and for ` the
repair/replacement of the sills . Mr. Carr seconded the motion. " 4
All were in favor and the motion so carried.
Non-Applicability Certificates Issued
a
Ms . Guy stated that Non-Applicability Certificates were issued to:
110 Federal Street to repair/replace approximately 400 s . f. of
clapboards, rotted facia, soffits and sheathing and about 6
. studs on the inside corner of 110 Federal Street. to replace
casings on 2 double hung windows and to repaint the building.
281 Lafayette Street to locate electrical meters in the
basement.
National Register Nominations
Ms . Guy stated that the following properties are scheduled for
consideration by the State Review Board on March 10, 1993 :
Salem Willows Historic District
Naumkeag Steam Cotton Mills Historic District
Saint Nicholas Russian Orthodox Church & Rectory
Fort Lee
Winter Island Historic District
1
Mr. Carr motioned to go on record in support of the nomination
being sent to the State Review Board and to send Ms . Guy as the
Commission' s representative.
Other Business
Ms . Guy stated that the City Council has ordered the Planning
Department to provide information regarding the possible demolition
• of the old Salem Police Station to create parking. Part of the
Order requires the Salem Historical Commission to provide
historical information on the building. Ms . Guy presented a draft
• January 6 , 1993, .Page 7
of historical information. Mr. Carr added a few lines regarding
the significance of the architect of the building. Ms . Guy will
draft a letter to the Salem Redevelopment Authority which provides
them with a copy of the historical information and asks them to go
on record as opposed to the demolition.
Mr. Carr stated that the brick sidewalks in front of the Assembly
House are being replaced with a different brick. Mr. Carr
suggested a letter be sent to Stan Bigelow with a copy to Dan Geary
which recommends that when repairing brick sidewalks, they should
reuse the existing brick. Mr. Carr stated that the original brick
is what makes it special .
Violations
343 Essex Street - Ms . Guy stated that Mr. Hedstrom reported that ;
a window has been replaced. Chairman Harris felt it looked better
than the greenhouse window that was there. Mr. Casey noted that
the owners were recently broken into through the greenhouse.
windows . Chairman Harris noted that the window has the same size s
opening that the greenhouse window had. Commission members will .
look at the window for the next meeting.
376 Essex Street - Mr. Casey stated that the widows walk and rail
over the front entrance has been removed. Ms . Guy will send a
letter to the owner.
Mr. Casey stated that porch work was done at S . Pine/Essex Street.
Mr. Casey will get the address for Ms . Guy
Correspondence
4 Andover Street responded to the Commission' s letter regarding
electrical meters, which the owner has suggested covering the
meters with a wooden box. Commission members felt such treatment
would be a negative precedent. Mr. Carr did not feel Massachusetts
Electric would swallow the cost of moving the meters and stated
that the Commission could require the owners to have the work done
and the owners could pursue have Massachusetts Electric cover the
cost by taking them to small claims court. Mr. Carr suggested that
a letter be sent to the owners which state the meters must be
moved, that the owners should deal with Massachusetts Electric and
that the Commission would help the owners in their pursuit of a
claim if necessary.
The Newhall Manor Nursing Home of 7 Carpenter Street responded to
the Commission' s letter and requested an extension to comply until
5/1/93 . The Commission so approved the extension.
Health and Education Services of 162 Federal street responded to
the Commission ' s letter and requested an extension to comply until
• January 6, 1993, Page 8
i
Spring. The Commission so approved the extension. Chairman Harris
noted that they should be reminded that mature plantings; are
required and felt that 2 arborvitae shrubs may not be sufficient. `
Ms . Guy stated that the Commission received a draft Memorandum ,of
Agreement for the Section 106 review for the S .E .S .D.
Ms . Guy stated that Tinti, Quinn & Savoy send a package .to the
National Register which included the Commission' s letter of: support
to designate the Endicott Building as contributing to the Downtown
Salem National Register District.
d
Minutes 41
Mr. Carr made a motion to approve the minutes of 11/4/92 . Mr. Cook: . '
seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so carried.•;
Commission Membership
"w
Chairman Harris stated that Mr. Stanton had offered his resignation,
to the Commission on October 27 , 1992 due to his being unable to
attend meetings through January, 1993 . The Commission accepted his
resignation with regret. i
F .5
Ms . Guy stated that she has spoken to Doug Kelleher who is a Balers"
resident that is employed by Massachusetts Historical Commission:
He would be interested in being appointed to the Commission. Ms .,".'; . a
Guy will put Mr. Kelleher in touch with Chairman Harris .
Chairman Harris also suggested John Goff be considered for',"'.
appointment. ,
There being no further business, Mr. Carr made a motion to adjourn.
Mr. Cook seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so
carried.
Respectfuli° ly submitted,
JJerk
A. Gu
C of �f�e Commission
Jg\JG1010693
F �
February 3, 1993, Page 1
SALEM HISTORICAL COMMISSION
MINUTES ,
FEBRUARY 3, 1993
A regular meeting of the Salem Historical Commission was- held: on
Wednesday, February 3, 1993 at 7 : 30 p.m. at One Salem Green.
Present were Vice Chairman Carr, and Messrs . Bailey, Casey and Slam
and Ms . Guy. Mr. Hedstrom entered later in the meeting.
Vice Chairman Carr called the meeting to order.
1 Chestnut Street
In continuation from a previous meeting, Dr. C. J. Mekelatos �.
submitted applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness and
Hardship to replace existing wooden gutters with aluminum at his
home at 1 Chestnut St. The applications noted that the wooden
gutters have been repaired three times but persist in breaking
down. There was no one present to represent the applicant.
Mr. Slam stated that the wooden gutters were an important
architectural feature and that aluminum was an inappropriate
material .
• Mr. Slam made a motion to approve the application for
Appropriateness in the hopes that it fails . Mr. Casey seconded the
motion.
Mr. Hedstrom joined the meeting at this time. Mr. Carr reviewed
the application and motion with Mr. Hedstrom.
The motion was voted upon. There were no votes in favor. All
votes were in opposition. The motion did not carry and the
application was therefore denied.
Mr. Slam noted that there was no information in support of the
Hardship application.
Mr. Slam made a motion to deny the application for Hardship. Mr.
Hedstrom seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so
carried.
389 Essex Street
Steven Sass and Ellen Golub presented an application for a
Certificate of Appropriateness to remove a wooden ladder being used
as a fire escape at the rear of 389 Essex Street. The applicants
were not present.
• Mr. Casey felt that the Commission should suggest to the homeowner
that the ballastrade be replaced.
v y ;::! �~
• February 3, 1993, Page 2
Mr. Slam made a motion to approve the application as submitted.
Mr. Hedstrom seconded the motion.
Claire Hayes of 387 Essex Street stated that she was in favor of
the application.
The motion was voted upon. All were in favor and the motion so
carried. ' '
Ms . Guy noted that a Certificate of Non-Applicability was,';' ssued
for repointing the chimneys at this property.
..'.'9: .
Mr. Carr suggested that a letter be sent to the homeowner sEating
that the Commission applauds the new homeowner for being ownek4,df: rt.,.
one of the few stick style buildings in Salem, that the Commission
has lots of expertise in building renovations, that the Commission, . `
would love to work with the new homeowner and that the homeowner
should feel free to contact the Commission. Mr. Carr suggested
that a list of items that the Commission recommends the homeowner
consider doing at the property be included.
f!
Mr. Casey noted that Mr. Sass has hired John Goff to do historical
research on the house. '
Ms . Guy felt that it could be overwhelming for the homeowner to
receive a list of recommendations from the Commission and suggested
that informal verbal suggestions be provided to Mr. Goff for him to
discuss with Mr. Sass .
Mr. Casey agreed that the recommendations should be kept informal .
Mr. Casey will talk to Mr. Goff.
54 Turner Street
In continuation from a previous meeting, the House of Seven Gables
Settlement Association applied for a Certificate of Appropriateness
for the partial demolition of the existing Visitors ' Center, Coffee
Shop and toilets . Construction of new Educational Center, Museum
Shop and Cultural space as an addition to the remaining portion of
the existing Visitors ' Center. Kitchen addition to the Retire
Beckett House. The applicant' s were not present.
Mr. Slam motioned to continue the application. Mr. Bailey seconded
the motion. All were in favor and the motion so carried.
Window Box Discussion
Ms . Juli Riemenschneider of the Salem Planning Department presented
• a fact sheet and drawing of a proposed window box for the
Commission' s consideration. Ms . Guy stated that the Planning
Department would like the Commission to consider giving a blanket
• February 3, 1993, Page 3
approval on windowboxes so that a windowbox competition can be held
throughout the city. s
Ms . Riemenschneider stated that the wood shop at the high school
would make up kits that would be sold to homeowners interested.
The homeowners would then assemble, finish, hang and plant the
windowboxes . The boxes will be constructed of wood. The boxes
will be coordinated so that the length of the box is equal . to the
width of the window. Participants could be required to paint the
boxes to match the body or trim color of the house.
Mr. Carr was concerned about uniformity and suggested that the
design of the boxes be part of the competition. Mr. Carr stated
that he liked the windowbox on the Sillars ' house on Summer Street.
Mr. Carr stated that he liked the idea of windowboxes even though'
they were more tied to Victorian homes . Mr. Carr noted however,
that most houses are not frozen in their own period.
Mr. Slam felt that the uniformity would be an excellent idea. Mr.
Slam noted that if the participant supplied there own box, each
would have to come before the Commission individually.
Ms . Riemenschneider stated that by making it easier and cheaper 'foi
• a homeowner to obtain a box, it would encourage participation in
the contest.
Mr. Casey felt that the boxes would not be a permanent fixture
since they only last approximately 5 years . Mr. Casey did not have
a problem with the design submitted.
Mr. Carr suggested a pamphlet be supplied to participants with
examples of window boxes . Mr. Carr felt the Commission should go
on record in support of windowboxes, but felt that uniformity is
against what the historic district is about.
Mr. Slam suggested the Commission approve the design and if a
participant wants another design, they can apply.
Mr. Bailey suggested that a flyer be supplied, but that the
homeowner be informed about the standard box that can be supplied.
Mr. Slam made a motion to approve the design submitted as a
standard but to encourage the participants to come up with their
own design which would require Commission approval . There was no
second.
Ms . Guy suggested that the Planning Department look into provided
one or two more designs that the participants can choose from. Ms .
. Guy stated that the wood shop might like the idea of having,
alternative designs for the students to make. Ms . Riemenschneider
stated that it is possible to come up with other designs, but that
• February 3, 1993, Page. 4
she would have to check with the School Department to coordinate ;:
it.
Mr. Slam agreed with Ms . Guy' s suggestion if it is feasible. " %
Mr. Bailey asked what material would be used. Ms . Riemenschneider
stated that she is looking into cedar and that it would definitely
not be pressure treated. If cedar is too expensive, pine would be
used and the use of a liner would be suggested.
Mr. Carr asked how the boxes would be attached. Ms .
Riemenschneiders -
stated that it could be with L-shaped brackets or
wooden brackets .
Mr. Bailey stated that some window boxes can go on porch railings .
Mr. Slam asked the time frame. Ms . Riemenschneider stated that
they want to advertise the contest in March and the boxes would be
hung in May/June. a
Mr. Carr felt that each participant in a district should apply on
their own. Mr. Slam stated that no one would enter the contest
knowing that they have to come before the Commission.
• Mr. Hedstrom agreed with Ms . Guy' s suggestion for one or two more
designs in order to eliminate the possibility of uniformity.
Ms . Guy noted that this is for discussion and that an application
has not been filed yet. Ms . Riemenschneider stated that she wanted .
to know if the Commission would consider a blanket approval before
she proceeded further.
Y
82 Derby Street
Ms . Guy read a letter from Century Bank concerning 82 Derby Street.
Century bank has agreed to perform the work required in the
Certificate with the exception of the following items that they
state existed prior to the district:
1 . Hip roof over second floor rear porch (existing roof to
remain) .
2 . Enclose galvanized downspouts in wood.
3 . Remove two picture windows on first floor, Becket Street side.
4 . Remove band of shingles (shingles to be repaired and painted) .
5 . Remove lights .
The letter requests a new amended Certificate of Appropriateness .
• Mr. Carr stated that item one was a miscommunication and that it
should only be a repair as necessary. Mr. Carr stated that he will
check the site to be sure that the downspouts are now galvanized.
• February 3, 1993, Page 5v
Mr. Carr stated that he was not concerned about the lights but
questioned if there was any way that the Commission could convince, ^,
the bank to complete items 3 and 4 .
Ms . Guy stated that the Commission cannot force the bank to 'bhange
those items that were there before the district was formed and that
the lights are not under the Commission' s jurisdiction. Ms . Guy
felt that since the bank has finally agreed to undertake a'"'lot of
work, the Commission should allow them to proceed before the
building gets sold and the Commission has to start all over with
another property owner.
Mr. Carr suggested that he and Mr. Hedstrom talk to the bank to try
to convince them that it would be beneficial to the sale of the
building to do items 3 and 4 .
Mr. Slam made a motion to amend the Certificate as requested by the .4
Century Bank letter and to allow Messrs. Carr and Hedstrom to try
to convince the bank to do more. Mr. Casey seconded the motion.
All were in favor and the motion so carried.
10 Flint Street '
• Ms . Guy stated that Mr. Riordan sold 10 Flint Street for $1 . 00 and
that she needs to send a letter to the new owner to provide them
with 30 days to correct the violations before a Clerk' s Certificate
of Vote is filed at the Registry of Deeds .
Mr. Carr stated that since the new homeowner is no doubt aware of
the violation, the Clerk' s Certificate should be amended and filed
immediately and a letter sent stating that it has been done and
that the Commission assumes the new owner was aware of this long-
running violation.
Mr. Casey made a motion to immediately file a Clerk' s Certificate
of Vote. Mr. Slam seconded the motion. All were in favor and the
motion so carried.
Correspondence
Ms . Guy read a letter from Stanton Bigelow, Director of Public
Services, which replied to the Commission' s letter concerning
sidewalks . Mr. Carr will speak to Chairman Harris about setting up
an appointment with Mr. Bigelow.
Ms . Guy stated that the city has been invited to submit full
application for the Massachusetts Historical Commission (MHC)
Survey and Planning Grant.
• The Commission received copies of letters from MHC concerning the
Loring Avenue Water Booster Pumping Station and the abandonment of
. f t
• February 3, 1993, Page 6 1
a portion of the Marblehead Branch of the Boston and Maine in Salem
stating that the proposed projects are unlikely to affects
significant historic or archaeological resources .
Ms . Guy stated that the public hearing in Boston for the National
Register nominations has been advertised and if members 'gets
telephone calls with questions, they should refer them to her.
Other Business
Ms . Guy stated that the Salem Library would like to repair =the
water fountain and requests any information on available grants for
such repair.
Ms . Guy stated that the Commission has been provided with a list' of
delinquent tax title accounts for the city and that the Commission
may deny, revoke or suspend any approval for anyone listed.
Mr. Slam made a motion to approve the minutes of July 22 , 1992 . "
Mr. Hedstrom seconded the motion, all were in favor and the motion-
so carried.
Mr. Casey asked that his name be added to the minutes under members
• attending the 1/6/93 meeting.
Violations/Work Status
Ms . Guy provided the Commission with an updated status of
violations . Each was reviewed and the action required of Ms . Guy
for each property is noted below.
271 Lafayette Street - Send notice that a Clerk' s Certificate will
be filed in 30 days .
111 Federal Street - remove from list of violations
10 Chestnut Street & 331 Essex Street - Mr. Casey made a motion
that an egregious violation exists and to immediately file a
Clerk' s Certificate. Mr. Hedstrom seconded the motion. All were
in favor and the motion so carried.
265 Lafayette St. - Send notice that a Clerk' s Certificate will be
filed in 30 days .
1 Cambridge St. - Send letter that fence constructed under Non-
Applicability does not replicate the length previously existing.
2 Flint St. - Fence okay as completed. Send letter that screening
• of deck insufficient.
L ,
Y�
February 3, 1993, Page`7ytr
51 Summer St. - Send letter that a Clerk' s Certificate will b6
filed in 30 days . 4 ' '
398 Essex .St. - Send 2nd letter regarding porch/rail .
Bertram Home - Send letter regarding extension of fence
3 Eaton Place - Send letter that egregious violation now exists and',
notify that a Clerk's Certificate will be filed in 30 days -'1 }
6 N. Pine St. - Send second letter regarding fence. ''
1-3 N. Pine St. - Send 2nd letter regarding doors . y �
391-391 1/2 Essex St. - Send second letter regarding fence.
333 Essex Street - Send letter regarding fence.
136 Federal Street - Send letter regarding finials .
0 N. Pine St. - Mr. Carr to view property and contact appropriate -
utility company.
• 192 Federal St. - Mr. Carr to view property to see if there is any .
violation. ,
362 Essex St. - Remove from violation list.
Pk.
18 River St. - Send second letter regarding fences .
343 Essex St. - Mr. Hedstrom felt the window replacing the`,
greenhouse window is way out of scale. Mr. Casey was in agreement.
Ms . Guy will send a letter requesting the homeowners apply.
43 Chestnut St. - Mr. Casey requested that the Commission send a
letter to the homeowners who have had their shutters off for 2 1/2 t
years . Mr. Casey stated that only one window has a set of
shutters . Mr. Carr stated that the owners should either request
permanent removal of all shutters or reinstall the shutters. Ms . t _
Guy will send a letter.
131 Federal Street - Mr. Casey stated that the fence has been
removed. Ms . Guy will send a letter.
Mr. Carr stated that the North Shore Sunday has chained a newspaper' .
vending machine to the Common fence. Mr. Carr felt that a letter
should be sent requiring that the box be removed completely. Mr.
Slam felt the letter should just asked that the chain be removed or
• the Commission will have to send letters to all the newspapers with
boxes in districts . Ms . Guy will send a letter to immediately
remove the chain and advise them that newspaper vending machines ';
r,
a
. February 3, 1993, Page 8, �.
l ,4,•
require Commission approval . 1 <,
Ms . Guy requested that a motion be made for her to take the actions + "
(as noted above) for violations/outstanding work. Pt- .fid
Mr. Bailey motioned that Ms . Guy take the actions requested (as
noted above) for violations/outstanding work. Mr. Hedstrom
seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so carried.
Site visit
Mr. Carr stated that the National Park Service (NPS) has uncovered
the original Derby Wharf during their archaeological investigations
and has scheduled a site visit for Friday, February 5 at 2 : 00 . ,, The
NPS is looking for input on whether they should document and £refill
the wharf, should possibly create an above ground exhibit by moving
part of the structure up or should possibly create a below ground
exhibit. -'
Ir
There being no further business, Mr. Slam made a motion to adjourn. '
Mr. Hedstrom seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion
so carried.
Respectfully submitted,
Jan A. Guy
Cle k of th Commission
a
f
c
1.
February 17 , 1993, Page 1 '
SALEM HISTORICAL COMMISSION
MINUTES
FEBRUARY 17 , 1993 dN
A regular meeting of the Salem Historical Commission was held on w
Wednesday, February 17 , 1993 at 7 : 30 p.m. at One Salem Green,
Salem, MA. Present were Chairman Harris and Messrs . Carr, Cook and
Slam and Ms . Guy.
38 Washington Square S.
Brian Wehrung and Lisa Dressler presented an application for a
Certificate of Appropriateness to install four roof ventilators at
their home at 38 Washington Square South. The vents are needed as
part of a multi-phase insulation program sponsored by Boston Gas .
A drawing of the proposed placement of the vents was provided along
with two full-size samples (one in grey, one in dark taupe) of the
vents .
Dorothy O'Donnell and Thomas O'Donnell submitted letters which
stated that they have no objection to the proposal .
Mr. Wehrung provided a sample of the slate on the roof which he
felt was better matched by the taupe.
•
Mr. Slam stated that the vents would not be very visible since the
roof is almost flat. (
Chairman Harris felt that the placement proposed were good choices . .
Mr. Carr stated that the application should be amended to Hardship.
Mr. Slam stated that the diagram exaggerates what the visibility
will actually be.
Mr. Carr asked how Boston Gas determines the number of vents
needed. Mr. Wehrung stated that they use an equation based on the
roof area to determine the number and size of the vents required.
Mr. Wehrung stated that they are actually proposing one less than
the equation shows .
Mr. Carr was concerned about the slate being removed and broken to
accommodate the vents . Mr. Carr was questioned if there is another
way to vent the attic, such as one fan.
Chairman Harris stated that the vents are the typical way to
ventilate the attic and that this is probably the best solution.
Mr. Carr questioned if this method is the only technological
• solution.
Ms. Dressler noted that they have had water freeze in their
February 17 , 1993, Page. 2
kitchen. Mr. Wehrung stated that they could consider a better ,
solution in the future.
Mr. Slam made a motion to amend the application to Hardship and
approve the four vents as proposed. Mr. Cook seconded the motion. f
;y
Mr. Slam noted that since only four members were present, a
unanimous vote is required.
The motion was voted upon. All were in favor and the motion so
carried.
401 Essex Street
Mr. David Schaejbe presented an application for a Certificate of
Hardship and requested that the Commission waive the public hearing
for roof replacement at 401 Essex Street which was recently damaged
by fire. Mr. Schaejbe proposes to replace the front of the hip
roof from slate to black asphalt. Currently, three sides are slate
and the rear is asphalt.
Mr. Slam questioned why the insurance company would not replace the
damaged slate in kind. Mr. Schaejbe felt that the insurance
• company would only pay to replace the damaged portion and stated
that the remaining slate was not in good condition.
Mr. Carr stated that since the insurance company is paying, they
should put on slate.
Mr. Carr motioned to waive the public hearing. Mr. Slam seconded ."
the motion. All were in favor and the motion so carried.
Mr. Carr motioned to approve the application as submitted in hopes
that it fails . There was no second.
Chairman Harris suggested that the Commission approve the slate and
continue the asphalt until the next meeting. This will allow Mr.
Schaejbe to get more information from the insurance company.
Mr. Slam made a motion to continue the Hardship application and to
approve a Certificate of Non-Applicability for the replacement of
the front hip roof section with slate which substantially matches
the existing. Mr. Carr seconded the motion. All were in favor and
the motion so carried.
r,.
54 Turner Street
In continuation from a previous meeting, the House of Seven Gables
Settlement Association applied for a Certificate of Appropriateness
• for the partial demolition of the existing Visitors ' Center, Coffee
Shop and toilets . Construction of new Educational Center, Museum
Shop and Cultural space as an addition to the remaining portion of
February 17 , 1993, Page 3`
rAL
• the existing visitors ' Center. Kitchen addition to the Retire '
Beckett House. The applicant' s were not present. '
Mr. Carr made a motion to continue the application. Mr. Slam "
seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so carried.
5 Carpenter Street
Ms . Guy stated that she received an application for a Certificate
of Non-Applicability from Paul and Catherine Cragin to reclapboard
the 2nd story of the real ell of 5 Carpenter Street. In addition,
the applications plan to replace the shingles with clapboards on
the rear facade of the rear ell . Ms . Guy noted that the rear
facade can be minimally seen from Gifford Court.
Mr. Carr made a motion to withhold the Certificate of Non- ,
Applicability pending a site visit by Messrs . Carr and Slam. If it
is determined that the application is applicable to a Certificate
of Appropriateness, the Certificate of Non-Applicability is not to
be sent and the applicants should be advised to apply under a
Certificate of Appropriateness . Mr. Slam seconded the motion, all r+
were in favor and the motion so carried. tri.
dk
t'
• Minutes
Mr. Carr made a motion to approve the minutes of January 6 , 1993 .
Mr. Slam seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so
carried.
Other Business
Chairman Harris introduced Doug Kelleher who is interested in
filling the vacancy on the Commission. Mr. Kelleher stated that he
is awaiting an opinion from the Massachusetts Historical Commission
staff attorney on whether there would be a conflict of interest,
since Mr. Kelleher is employed by Massachusetts Historical
Commission.
Chairman Harris stated that there is a lecture by Steve Jerome
concerning Salem City Hall on February 20 at 2 : 00 at Mt. Auburn.
There being no further business, Mr. Slam made a motion to adjourn.
Mr. Cook seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so
carried.
Respectfully submitted,
• Ja?kof
Gu
Cl t e Commission
1.
blt..
• March 3, 1993, Page 1 .
r ,
SALEM HISTORICAL COMMISSION
MINUTES
MARCH 3, 1993
A regular meeting of the Salem Historical Commission was 'held on * �
Wednesday, March 3, 1993 at 7 : 30 p.m. at One Salem Greeny-,.Salem, +. '
MA. Present were Chairman Harris and Messrs . Casey, Hedstrom,
Carr, Slam and Oedel and Ms . Guy. Mr. Cook entered latera in the
meeting.
19 Broad Street
C. Meade and Patricia Camenga submitted an Application -for a
Certificate of Appropriateness for 19 Broad Street to replace a
wood picket fence with a custom iron fence using 1/2" solid pickets
punched through the top rail, with blunt top. The fence would be
iron black enamel finish and is needed due to constant vandalizing1,
of the exiting fence.
Ms . Guy stated that the applicants have requested to be continued ;
until the April 7, 1993 meeting since they cannot be present. ' '
z.
Mr. Carr made a motion to continue the application. Mr. Oedel ft'
• seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so carried.
54 Turner Street 1
z
In continuation from a previous meeting, the House of Seven Gables -
Settlement Association applied for a Certificate of Appropriateness
for the partial demolition of the existing Visitors ' Center, Coffee
Shop and toilets . Construction of new Educational Center, Museum
Shop and,Cultural space as an addition to the remaining portion of
the existing Visitors ' Center. Kitchen addition to the Retire
Beckett House. The applicant' s were not present.
Mr. Carr made a motion to continue the application. Mr. Casey
seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so carried.
Mr. Cook entered at this time.
84 Federal Street
John & Mary Wathne submitted an application for a Certificate of
Non-Applicability for 84 Federal Street to install 2 skylights on
the West surface of the high roof which would be only visible from
Ledge Hill Park which is 3 miles away. The application is also to
remove the television antennae from the chimney and to eventually
reroof to match the east surface.
• Ms . Guy provided pictures and stated that - she could not see the
roof surface from the public way. Mr. Casey was in agreement.
• March 3, 1993, Page . 2 J �
Mr. Carr made a motion to approve the application as submitted.
Mr. Casey seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so `aM1
carried. Mr. Cook abstained from voting. :<!
NPS Walkways signage
a x ,
Chairman Harris stated that the National Park Service (NPS)'''has u
funding for a series of walkways . Five routes with signage had
been previously designed by the Baldwins . However the NPS"has only
enough funds for the McIntire and Forest River walkways . Chairman
Harris stated that it was determined that the Baldwin design was
too subtle and other ways of designating the routes are- being
considered such as : }
1 . Installing bronze, iron or granite plaques within the
sidewalk; ',
2 . Putting signage on existing posts or street signs; and/or
3 . Specially designed bollards at turning points .
Mr. Carr stated that he would not want to see the addition of new
sign posts, but rather any signage be added to existing posts .
19 1/2 Washington Square North ` t' R
BPM Productions presented an application for a Certificate of
Appropriateness to install 3 custom Marquis style awnings at the
Witch Museum at 19 1/2 Washington Square North. The frame would be
1" steel welded black. The awning material would be Walnut Brown
Tweed - Sunbrella. According to the application, the awning sizes
are 1 @ 13 ' 7" x 13 ' 4" and 2 @ 6 ' 6" x 410" . The owner, Bruce
Michaud, was present. A sample of the awning material was
provided.
Ms . Guy stated that the awning supplier had a great visual of the
proposal that he was supposed to bring to the meeting. The
supplier was not present and therefore the drawings were not
available.
Mr. Michaud stated that the awnings are needed for protection from
rain for visitors . The awning shape will match the contour of the
building and the awning on the main door will extend at an angle
down to the brick bollards . Mr. Michaud stated that the side doors
would have an approximate 3 ' awning. Mr. Michaud stated that there ,
will be no lettering or numbering on the awnings .
Mr. Oedel made a motion to continue the application until April 7 ,
1993 . Mr. Cook seconded the motion. All were in favor and the
motion so carried.
r
March 3, 1993, Page •.3
y
3 Eaton Place
Ms . Guy read a letter from Richard Savickey concerning •3 Eaton
Place. The letter is in response to the notice of intent'^t`o file
a Clerk' s Certificate of Vote which was sent to Mr. Savickey. „
Mr. Savickey' s letter requests an extension to complete?'i�fthe
carpentry work by the end of May, 1993 and the painting to be
completed by the end of August, 1993 . 4.
Chairman Harris suggested that the time be extended and that the
owner be notified that a Clerk' s Certificate of Violation will be
filed on June 1, 1993 if not completed.
Mr. Slam questioned if the property was for sale. Mr. CooVstated
that he will check.
Mr. Slam moved to approve the extension unless Mr. Cook advises Ms .
Guy that the property is for sale. If it is for sale, the Cl'erk' s
Certificate should be filed as per the notice. If not for ',sale; --i
the Certificate should be filed on June 1, if the work is , not
completed. Mr. Oedel seconded the motion. All were in favor ander:
the motion so carried. F;
• 53 Dow Street
Ms . Guy read a City Council Order which requests that the Building+
Inspector form a Board of Survey and inspect 53 Dow Street. ;
e`
Mr. Carr suggested that any action be deferred to the judgement of
the Chairman. Mr. Carr felt that the Commission should carefully ,
choose its battles . Ms . Guy was in agreement and stated that there ^;a'
is no survey form on file for this building. '
401 Essex Street
In continuation from a previous meeting, Mr. David Schaejbe
presented an application for a Certificate of Hardship to replace
a portion of the slate roof with black asphalt at 401 Essex Street.
The applicant was not present and no further information was
provided concerning the insurance company.
Mr. Oedel made a motion to continue the application. Mr. Casey
seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so carried.
82 Derby Street
Ms . Guy read a letter from Attorney Jeff Shub which requested an
• extension of 60 days to complete the work at 82 Derby Street. A
letter was also read from the Building Inspector to Century Bank
concerning code violations found at the property.
G
March 3, 1993, Page 4 '
Ms . Guy stated that she spoke to Attorney Shub who stated that the "
bank has a purchase and sale agreement with a potential buyer and
that the bank intends to do a portion of the work, including the
vents, and that the new owner would do the remaining. Money would
be put in escrow with Chairman Harris as a signatory. '
Chairman Harris stated that she also talked to Attorney. Shub,.who
stated that the bank has been holding off on the venting until they
had a purchase and sale agreement in case a potential buyer did not
want to have a laundromat, making the vent work unnecessary.
Ms . Guy stated that the Plumbing Inspector has spoken to Ray.Noyes,
the vent-work contractor, who stated that he has been waiting for
parts to come in.
Mr. Carr stated that he has talked to the potential buyer, who was
not fully made aware by Ms . Andrews of the Commission' s
requirements since the buyer was hoping to be able to complete the
work over the next two years .
Mr. Carr stated that he wants an independent estimate on the work �' ^•
in order to determine the minimum amount required for the escrow.
Chairman Harris felt a notice of intent to file a Clerk' s
Certificate as to Violation should be sent. Ms . Guy felt that the ?`
Commission could immediately file a Clerk' s Certificate as to
Outstanding Work.
Mr. Carr made a motion to immediately file a Clerk' s Certificate of
Vote and that the letter to the bank notifying them of the filing
should state that the Commission is willing to work on the escrow
arrangement and is awaiting drawings and estimates . They should
also be notified that they will be put on next meeting' s agenda. , .
Mr. Oedel seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so
carried.
131 Federal Street
Ms . Guy stated that she drove by 131 Federal Street and that a
portion of the fence has been removed and a new frame put up, but
that pickets are not in place. Chairman Harris stated that she
spoke to the owners who are planning to complete the fence work.
Ms . Guy suggested that rather than send a violation letter, the
Commission issue a Certificate of Non-Applicability for fence
replacement and give the owners a timeframe.
Mr. Carr motioned to approve a Certificate of Non-Applicability for
. fence replacement contingent that the work be completed by June 1, e„
1993 . Mr. Hedstrom seconded the motion. All were in favor and the
motion so carried.
i
�J
March 3, 1993,„Paget 5 h °
Minutes �•
Mr. Cook made a motion to approve the minutes of November 18, 1992 . d 'Ta r
Mr. carr seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so h� [
carried.
Mr. Oedel made a motion to approve the minutes of December 2, 1992 . x
Mr. Casey seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so
carried.
Mr. Carr made a motion to approve the minutes of February 17, 1993 .
Mr. Cook seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so
carried.
Other Business
Ms . Guy stated that the Commission received a listing of 1992
amendments to the National Historic Preservation Act and their 3
potential impact on Certified Local Governments .
Ms . Guy stated that the first Clerk's Certificate of Vote was filed
on March 3, 1993 for 10 Flint Street.
M
Ms . Guy questioned whether the fence installed at 391 Essex Street
should be considered a minor or major violation. Mr. Casey stated y
that at least two neighbors have complained that the owners did not
go through the process that everyone else has to. Ms . Guy will
mail the second notice.
d
Mr. Casey stated that he, Jack Cempellin and others will be meeting
on March 6 , 1993 at 10 : 00 to complete the photography and B forms
for the expansion of the Common district. Mr. Casey asked that
Commission members with assignments join them, or give Mr. Casey
their assignments for others to do.
There being no further business, Mr. Slam made a motion to adjourn.
Mr. Oedel seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so
carried.
Respectfull submitted,
� I
Ja A. Gu
Cl rk of t e Commission
t
April 7, 1993, Page 1 �
•
SALEM HISTORICAL COMMISSIONh e
MINUTES
APRIL 7 , 1993
A regular meeting of the Salem Historical Commission wass.held on F� 1
Wednesday, April 7, 1993 at 7 : 30 p.m. at One Salem Green, `Salem,
MA. Present were Chairman Harris, Messrs . Casey, Bailey and Oedel
and Ms . Guy. Messrs . Carr, Hedstrom, Slam and Cook entered later
in the meeting.
Chairman Harris called the meeting to order.
19 1/2 Washington Square North
In continuation from a previous meeting, BPM Productions presented ,r
an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to install 31.'
awnings at 19 1/2 Washington Square North. Ray L'Abbe of New"
England Awning & Canvas submitted a drawing and stated that the two 1
side awnings will be 1/2 round. Mr. L'Abbe stated that the awnings ,
will have the arch of the windows .
Bruce Michaud of BPM Productions stated that the awnings will
remain all year long so that the frame is not left exposed in the
• Winter. The awnings will be replaced when they start to fade. Mr.
Michaud stated that there will be no writing on the awnings, that
the main awning will be attached to the two front piers, that it
will be as low as possible and have the same slope as the handicap
ramp. Mr. Michaud felt the towers tend to obstruct the two side
entrances and will dwarf the center entrance awning.
Mr. Slam and Mr. Carr entered the meeting at this time.
Mr. L'Abbe stated that the valance design is in keeping with the
rampart tower design.
Mr. Bailey questioned if the main awning will block the front door.
Mr. Michaud replied that most of the door will be blocked but that
the frame will not hide any features under the awning.
Mr. Cook and Mr. Hedstrom entered the meeting at this time.
Mr. Michaud stated that the awnings will be only one color, with no
highlighting border to draw attention to it.
There was no public comment.
Mr. Carr made a motion to close the public hearing. Mr. Casey
seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so carried.
• Mr. Bailey was present but not voting.
Mr. Carr stated that he was sympathetic of the need and supportive
W �
• April 7, 1993, Page 2 "
of Mr. Michaud and his business, but felt that, architecturally, '
the awnings will obscure the facade. Mr. Carr stated that awnings ,
were not an appropriate appendage to a Gothic church design.'
�
Chairman Harris stated that the awnings would not permanently'alter
the building, but may obscure the door. Chairman Harris stated
that the main awning was typical of New York churches and noted
that Salem is an urban setting.
Mr. Casey was in agreement with Chairman Harris .
Mr. Cook also agreed and added that the building is a busines.s�'r
purpose and the awnings are removable. q" ~
Mr. Bailey questioned the need for awnings on the side doors z� Mrd
Michaud stated that rain comes in when the doors are open and the+' ,_
side awnings also offer balance.
Mr. Oedel felt that the awnings could be considered a temporary
structure, but felt the main awning's design was too wide and boxy.,
Mr. Oedel felt the awning should be hugged around the doorway.
Mr. Michaud stated that, if the awning was smaller, it would'. notk #`
• assist the customers and would narrow the look of the window above'
Mr. Carr reminded the Commission that the application was forts .`:
Appropriateness . Mr. Carr did not feel that the building now being ?` { �g
a business was not a architectural criteria consistently used
Mr. Slam preferred approving the application under a Certificate of
Non-Applicability as a temporary structure. Mr. Slam was not
comfortable approving under Appropriateness . � »
Ms . Guy noted that the Commission allowed a temporary entrance for
a specific duration at the Brookhouse home.
M1•
Mr. Slam made a motion to change the application to a Certificate
of Non-Applicability, to approve the installation of awnings for a
temporary duration not to exceed 5 years . The Commission may
consider renewing the Certificate, entertain a new proposal or
require the removal of the awnings in 5 years . Mr. Casey seconded
the motion. Chairman Harris and Messrs . Cook, Slam, Oedel, Casey, `
and Bailey voted in favor. Mr. Carr noted in opposition. Mr. L
Hedstrom was present but not voting.
Window Boxes
Juli Riemenschneider of the Salem Planning Department presented an �d
• application for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the blanket
approval of window boxes for any property in an historic district.
The City will be sponsoring a windowbox contest in the summer and
April 7, 1993, Page 3 r,
is taking orders for boxes from the residents . Ms . Riemenschneider
presented 3 models of window boxes prepared by the Salem High wood
shop who will prepare kits for the homeowners to put together. The
homeowner would be required to match the width of the box to<the ^ '
width of the window and paint the box the trim color of _the house.
A sample bracket was provided.
.a 4
Mr. Carr stated that sometimes boxes fit on top of the window sills
and should be encouraged whenever possible. Mr. Carr advocated
style A & B but not C.
Mr. Carr made a motion to approve the application as submitted
conditional that boxes be located on the window sill when possible
or, if bracketed, to be below the window sill, that the color of
the boxes be the trim or body color and that applications for boxes
other than the three presented will require individual approval
from a delegate of the Commission. The Certificate will expire in
one year. Mr. Oedel seconded the motion. All were in favor and
the motion so carried.
19 Broad Street
C. Meade and Patricia Camenga presented an application for a
• Certificate of Appropriateness and Non-Applicability to replace a
wooden picket fence with a custom iron fence using 1/2" solid
square pickets punched through the top rail with a blunt top. The
iron will have a black enamel finish. The iron fence is requested
due to constant vandalism of the wood fence.
Mr. Slam stated that an iron fence is not guarantee against
vandalism.
Mr. Carr understood why a more durable fence was designed, but felt
that the existing fence is unique and in style with the building.
Mr. Carr felt that such elements make Salem special . Mr. Carr
noted that vinyl siding is also durable but not appropriate.
Mr. Slam did not feel metal was appropriate for this style house.
Mr. Camenga stated that he could not continue to replace the
pickets and rails . Mr. Camenga stated it was not worth the time,
money and aggravation.
Mr. Hedstrom recommended some methods for fastening the caps and
stantions .
Ms . Camenga stated that they are dealing with 30 years of
frustration.
• Mr. Slam stated that he was sympathetic, but that he could not 9
approve metal as appropriate.
• April 7, 1993, Page 4 e �
Chairman Harris suggested an ornate cast iron or aluminum cast 1
fence.
a
Mr. Carr made a motion to deny both applications . Mr. Slam
seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so .carried.
Messrs . Cook, Carr, Oedel, Slam and Hedstrom voted in favor.
Chairman Harris and Mr. Casey abstained from voting. Mr. Bailey
was present but not voting.
Ms. Guy suggested that the homeowners get pictures of what fence
was there when the house was built. Ms . Camenga stated that they
have seen the pictures which is of an ugly flatboard fence.
Mr. Oedel stated that there are a couple of companies thaty. due „
glassing. Mr. Hedstrom stated that the pickets could be done in
white oak.
401 Essex Street
1
In continuation from a previous meeting, David Schaejbe submitted
an application for a Certificate of Hardship to replace a slate
roof damaged by fire with asphalt. The applicant was not present
and there was no additional information concerning the insurance t ,
• company paying for the slate roof replacement. Ms . Guy noted that
the application could not be continued again. y
Mr. Carr made a motion to deny the application. Mr. Oedel seconded V
the motion. All were in favor and the motion so carried. Mr.
Bailey was present but not voting.
343 Essex Street
Jonathan and Christine Wolff presented an application for a
Certificate of Hardship to replace a "greenhouse" style window, �:
which had been damaged during a break-in, with a traditional double '
hung window comparable to those used elsewhere in the house.
Mr. Oedel made a motion to approve the application as submitted.
There was no second.
Mr. Casey asked if the window opening had been expanded. Ms . Wolff
replied in the negative and added that they had to fill in where it
was smaller. Ms . Wolff noted that the window size matches those on
the rest of the house.
Mr. Carr stated that the existing smaller windows on the fist floor
are out of scale with the house.
. Ms . Guy noted that there are no shutters on the new window. Ms .
Wolff stated that they have one shutter to put on the window.
April 7 , 199J,-Page 5
Ilk
Mr. Slam made a motion to change the application from Hardship to
Appropriateness and approve the application as submitted. Mr. .�
Oedel seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so N
carried. Mr. Bailey was present but not voting.
38 Warren Street
Susan and David Faul presented an application for a Certificate of
Appropriateness to move the side entry (door, porch and steps) from
its present location to the place currently occupied by a window
that is eleven feet closer to the street. The application also
proposed to replace the window that is located between the present
side entry and the window that will be replaced by the new side
entry with a smaller on. The places where these structures are
eliminated will be filled with clapboard and painted to match the
existing surface of the house. The application also proposed to
alter the current design of the side entry by installing steps
leading to the back of the house as well as to the front. A sketch
was submitted.
Also presented was an application for a Certificate of Non-
Applicability to eliminate the structure over the steps that lead
to the cellar and replace it with a bulkhead and to eliminate the i
• present window and exhaust fan and replace them with a window
approximately five to six feet in width and two to three fee high. t.
The places where structures are eliminated will be filled with
clapboard and painted to match the existing exterior.
Ms. Faul stated that the railing will have to be made higher to
meet the present code.
Mr. Casey stated that the new smaller window should batch the
stairwell window size and detail .
Mr. Carr made a motion to approve the Certificate of Non-
Applicability due to the work not being visible from the public
way. Mr. casey seconded the motion, all were in favor, and the
motion so carried. Mr. Bailey was present but not voting.
Mr. Carr made a motion to approve the application for a Certificate
of Appropriateness conditional that the small window proposed be
located in the approximate location as shown on the drawing, that
the window match the existing stairwell window in all respects
including level, that the door be located as shown, that the
entryway being brought forward duplicate the existing entryway in
all respects with the exception that steps may also lead to the
rear, that the rail be raised to the minimum height allowable by
code and that caps be placed on the posts . Mr. Slam seconded the
• motion. All were in favor and the motion so carried. Mr. Bailey
was present but not voting.
• April 7, 1993, Page, 6 r' j
f �
a
Ms . Faul stated that they may decide they do not want the new small
window at all . 7i.
Mr. Carr motioned to allow the option of not installing the window. . "" �
Mr. Casey seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so
carried. Mr. Bailey was present but not voting.
82 Derby Street - Discussion
Chairman Harris read into the record, recent correspondence
concerning 82 Derby Street:
1 . Letter dated 3/8/93 from Raymond Noyes, Essex County
Craftsmen to Leo Tremblay, Building Inspector.
2 . Letter dated 3/22/93 from Atty. Jeffrey W. Shub to Salem
Historical Commission with drawings and proposal ,
enclosed.
a
3 . Letter dated 3/31/93 from Atty. Jeffrey W. Shub to Salem
Historical Commission with drawings enclosed.
Mr. Carr stated that he attended several site visits with 1
• representatives of Century Bank. Mr. Carr stated that the bank has
agreed to take out the picture windows on the Beckett Street side w
and to remove the band of shingles; both of which they are not
required to do. Mr. Carr felt the new windows should be 6 over 6
and as windows need replacing they can also be changed to 6 over 6 .
This will plan for the long term.
Attorney Jeffrey W. Shub, representing Century North Shore Bank,
stated that the unused vents will be capped and covered over with
siding.
Mr. Casey stated that the windows should have intregal muntins, not
snap-ins or vinyl clad.
Mr. Robert Harrington, the carpenter hired by Century Bank to
complete the work, asked if the window casings should be 1 x 4 with
1 3/4 band molding. Mr. Hedstrom replied in the affirmative.
Mr. Casey stated that the plan is missing the transom light over
the door on Derby Street. Atty. Shub stated that the transom light
will be included.
The Commission reviewed the drawings provided and marked up the
drawings as necessary to clarify the work to be done.
• Mr. Carr stated that, on the facade facing 82 Derby Street,, the
center window will be removed and sided over. The grates on the
two remaining windows will be removed and louvered wooden shutters
i,
• April 7 , 199,3, Page 7
f
will be installed in the closed position. '
Mr. Carr stated that the porch posts should be reused if possible.
Mr. Harrington stated that there will be a 4 - 4 1/4 exposure on
the clapboards .
Mr. Carr stated that the overhang will be eliminated, a hip roof ,
will be added, the lattice work will be removed, both doors will
remain and the door on the left will be framed. r
Mr. Hedstrom suggested moving the electrical service from the front
to the side.
Mr. Carr stated that the shed on the roof is to be clapboardecl and
trim added to match the rest of the building. Mr. Carr stated that
the false chimney should be the height of the bottom of the fascia
of the third story. Mr. Carr stated that the chimney should be `.."
stucco not brick facade.
Mr. Harrington supplied a sample of a turned baluster. Mr. Carr
stated that he preferred square balusters .
• Mr. Harrington suggested not painting the deck for six months . f
Mr. Shub stated that he would like a new Certificate with a new
timetable. Atty. Shub stated that 15 to 30 work days are needed
for construction and 30 to 45 more days for paint. Mr. Carr
suggested requiring May 31, 1993 for the work to be completed and
July 15, 1993 for the painting to be completed.
Atty. Shub stated that he would like approval to reinstall signs
and lighting before they are removed. Ms . Guy stated that there is
not application before the Commission and it is too late to
schedule a public hearing for the next meeting. Chairman Harris
suggested placing the issue on the next agenda to consider a
conceptual approval or a waiver of the public hearing.
Mr. Casey suggested that the paint color of the body be Antique
White. Chairman Harris stated that the paint should be gloss .
Membership Discussion
Chairman Harris stated that she would like to retire from being the
Chairperson effective at the close of this meeting.
Mr. Casey made a motion to nominate Mr. Oedel as Chairman and Mr.
Carr as Vice-Chairman. Mr. Hedstrom seconded the motion. All were
. in favor and the motion so carried.
Chairman Harris stated that she will also be resigning from the
Q4 �
April 7 , 19.9;3, Page
Commission. Mr. Slam thanked Chairman Harris on behalf of .
the ,
Commission for her many hears of service. ''r"
Mr. Hedstrom left the meeting at this time.
398 Essex Street
William White presented an application for a Certificate of �a.
Appropriateness for approval of a rear porch as constructed . '$
replacing an old, damaged and dangerous porch. The design is. `
similar but the ballasters were placed on the outside of the rails:; :_ .`'
The application states that the balusters will be corrected yl ' ')
necessary. "
Mr. Carr made a motion to approve the porch as construct
conditional that the balusters and railing be replaced as ,Fpetk• ,` *'
sample available at the Commission office and the deck be painted. s'. . .
Work and painting is to be completed by July 15, 1993 . Mr. ,Oedel w
seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so carried.
skit 1�'f
4q
54 Turner Street
In continuation from a previous meeting, the House of Seven Gables,'
Settlement Association applied for a Certificate of AppropriatenessY
for the partial demolition of the existing Visitors ' Center, Coffee,,,, `. .
Shop and toilets . Construction of new Educational Center, Museum°'s6 :
Shop and Cultural space as an addition to the remaining portion ofs;',y'
the existing Visitors ' Center. Kitchen addition to the Retire` ,.
Beckett House. The applicant's were not present. ,
Mr. Slam made a motion to continue the application. Mr. Carr ,
seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so carried
a `t
174 Federal Street '• !� `
Donald Wallace submitted an application for a Certificate of Non-
Applicability to replace worn shingles with like product to blends `#
in with existing areas . Ms . Guy stated that she talked with Mr.
Wallace' s attorney, Carol Perry, who stated that all work to be
done has already been done and that she did not expect additional '
work to be undertaken.
Mr. Carr stated that he visited the site, and although the shingle
installation does not blend well will the existing, the color was
changed from green to black, which matches the existing. Mr. Carr
recommended accepting the work as completed.
Ms . Guy felt that since the work was part of an outstanding :E
• violation, there was no need to issue a Certificate. Ms . Guy
stated that the Commission will need to accept the work in order 4.
for the law suit to be settled.
r't
April 7 , 1993, Page 9 ;.
Mr. Slam made a motion to accept the work as completed.�' Mr. Oedel $
seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so carried.
10 Flint Street - Discussion '
Mr. Carr and Mr. Casey have been meeting with Mr. Legnard 'regarding,
the outstanding violation at 10 Flint Street. Malone ' fence has
supplied a quotation to complete the fence. Because the ,
photographs are not clear enough to determine, Mr. Carr- asked if
the ballasters of the step railing should relate to the porch
ballasters or fence ballasters and whether they should be square or
round. The Commission determined they would be willing to accept
"beefy" round or square ballasters which relate to the fence
ballasters .
Other Business
Ms . Guy read a letter from Donald Koleman which states that he will
extend the replacement fence at 1 Cambridge Street approximately
4/30/93 .
Ms . Guy stated that the SESD is proposing to demolish 13 homes on
Fort Avenue which were built 1949 on. Chairman Harris stated that d'
someone on the Commission should stay on top of the SESD project.
Mr. Slam made a motion to approve the minutes of February 3 and }`
March 3, 1993 . Mr. Casey seconded the motion. All were in favor '
and the motion so carried.
Chairman Harris noted that Historic Salem, Inc . is having a
cocktail party on May 10, 1993 and that the Commission should try
to have its preservation awards at that time. The Commission would
have to vote on awards at the next meeting.
Mr. Casey stated that he did not feel that 53 Dow Street was in so
bad a condition that it should be condemned. Mr. Carr motioned
that the Commission attempt to institute the Demolition Delay
Ordinance. Ms . Guy stated that there is no application before the
Commission.
There being no further business, Mr. Slam made a motion to adjourn.
Mr. Cook seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so
carried.
Respectfully submitted,
A. Guy
Cl
Cl k of theommission
i�
6
i
i'
• April 21, 1993, Page 1
SALEM HISTORICAL COMMISSIONyLL
MINUTES
APRIL 21, 1993
A regular meeting of the Salem Historical Commission was'.held on
Wednesday, April 21, 1993, at 7 : 30 p.m. at One Salem Green, Salem,
MA. Present were Chairman Oedel and Messrs . Casey, Cook, Bailey
and Carr and Ms . Guy.
Chairman Oedel called the meeting to order and suggested that a
discussion regarding one violation be discussed at the beginning of
each meeting.
Chairman Oedel stated that he would like to consider members
thoughts on the possibility of recommending term limitations to .the
Mayor. Chairman Oedel ' s initial suggestion is a limit of two 3
year terms before a member must take a minimum of one-year break.
Mr. Casey stated that Massachusetts Historical Commission (MHC,)
recommends that one member' s term expire each year.
88 Federal Street
Kathryn A. Wright presented an Application for a Certificate of
• Appropriateness to rebuild a chimney at the rear of the house from
the roofline in the existing dimensions with a change in appearance
from existing stucco to exposed "Colonial" brick (new brick with :
color of used brick) .
Ms . Wright stated that the chimney cannot be seen from Federal
Street and that the Webb building is behind her. Ms . Wright noted
that the chimney leaks .
Mr. Carr made a motion to deny the application for a Certificate of
Appropriateness and to approve a Certificate of Non-Applicability
due to the chimney not being visible from the public way. Mr. Cook
seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so carried.
54 Turner Street
In continuation from a previous meeting, the House of Seven Gables
Settlement Association applied for a Certificate of Appropriateness
for the partial demolition of the existing Visitors ' Center, Coffee
Shop and toilets . Construction of new Educational Center, Museum
Shop and Cultural space as an addition to the remaining portion of
the existing Visitors ' Center. Kitchen addition to the Retire
Beckett House. The applicant' s were not present.
Mr. Carr made a motion to continue the application. Mr. Bailey
• seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so carried.
April 21, 1993, Page 2
r
• A
82 Derby Street
The Century Bank and Trust Company presented an Application for a
Certificate of Appropriateness for signage and lighting at.:82 Derby
Street. Drawings of the signage were presented. Mr. P.J:!.%Yateman, " -
representing Century Bank, stated that there will be two signs, one
on Derby Street and one on Beckett Street. The color will be =left
up to the Commission. Mr. Yateman stated that Annie Harris had
previously suggested that gooseneck lighting be used, but that he -
did not have a picture.
Chairman Oedel stated that the Commission did not have jurisdiction
over lighting attached to the building, but did have a strong
interest in reviewing their selection.
Mr. Carr made a motion to waive the public hearing and to approve
the size and location of the signage as shown on the plan. , Mr. a '
Casey seconded the motion, all were in favor and the motion-- so
carried.
Mr. Carr stated that Salem signage is traditionally black with gold
lettering.
.•F, 1
• Chairman Oedel asked if the signage should be approved flush 4
against the building. Mr. Carr replied in the affirmative. r
Mr. Carr recommended that the Commission review the design of the
gooseneck lamps .
Mr. Carr made a motion to approve two lines of "Times Bold"
typeface as proposed and if the lettering requires changing, that
such approval be delegated to the Chairman and Vice-Chairman.
Signage to be flush against the building. Mr. Cook seconded the
motion. All were in favor and the motion so carried.
3•..
Minutes
Mr. Casey made a motion to approve the minutes of April 7, 1993.
Mr. Carr seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so
carried.
Correspondence
Ms . Guy read a letter from Joel Caron, 4 Andover Street, which
states that negotiations are in progress with Massachusetts
Electric concerning relocation of the meters on the side of the
house. Mr. Casey made a motion to send an acknowledgement letter
which states that the Commission has extended the timeframe
it • requirement for removal of the meters for 30 days and that the
Commission looks forward to a solution commensurate with the
Commission's previous letter. Mr. Bailey seconded the motion, all
' c
} 5
• April 21, 1993, Page 3 {
were in favor and the motion so carried.
The Commission received a letter from MHC to the House of Seven
..x '
Gables which finds that the security system installation will have +~' '
no effect on significant resources .
:.a;',
The Commission received a letter from MHC to Camp, Dresser & iMcKee,
(CDM) concerning the SESD plans for reconstruction and landscaping
for Webb/Bridge Streets . The Commission recommends'fthat the
concrete sidewalks be edged in brick, that street trees be planted
and that they have the opportunity to review and approve more
specific information on the landscaping component. Chairman Oedel <<
stated that the Commission should send a letter to CDM concurring ¢
with MHC 's letter.
The Commission received an Executive Summary of the MHC End-of Year
Report - FY1992 . « .
Electrical Services
Mr. Carr stated that he, Mr. Casey and Ms . Guy met with Paul Tuttle
to discuss better coordination between the Electrical Department
and the Historical Commission. Mr. Carr noted that there is a
• successful relationship with the Building Department. # '
o ^^ 1
Mr. Carr summarized that when an electrician seeks to install or
upgrade service, Massachusetts Electric (ME) is contacted first and 4I
the electrician may begin work. The electrician then has five days
to get the local permit, of which an application can be mailed in. _
Since work may already be completed by the time the Electrical
Department is notified, a system similar to that with the Building
Department cannot be instituted. Ms . Guy noted that the Electrical
Department will continue to notify electricians whenever possible
and to that extent Ms . Guy provided Mr. Tuttle with a complete
street listing and maps of the districts ' properties . The
Commission will also send some type of update to all property ^•
owners concerning electrical services .
Ms . Guy presented a draft letter to be sent to all electrical
contractors in the local yellow pages which will remind them that
they can be liable for not obtaining Historic Commission approval .
Mr. Carr suggested that member telephone in any changes to the
letter this week.
Public Relations
Chairman Oedel suggested that a yearly plan for the release of
newsletters , press releases and homeowner mailings be instituted to
• promote preservation and the Commission' s work. Ms . Guy stated
that the building survey forms could be mailed to each district
over the summer. Chairman Oedel would like a newsletter to be sent
3
April 21, 1993, Page 4
twice a year and suggested that stickers be included with' the first
newsletter which could be placed on the homeowner' s electric meters rf■+
to warn contractors that they are in an historic district.
C:.
389 Essex Street
Mr. Bailey made a motion that Messrs . Carr and Casey be ,del'egated,.
to work with the homeowner to resolve the electric meter issue +.at
389 Essex Street. Mr. Cook seconded the motion. All were in favor
and the motion so carried. =
Other Business
:t
Ms . Guy stated that the vote to approve Salem's National Register
nominations at MHC meeting of March 10 is invalid due to a
notification error made by MHC. A new vote will be scheduled for
their October meeting.
Mr. Carr stated that Malone Fence has indicated that they havebeen
hired to complete the fence at 10 Flint Street by April 30, 1993
which is the closing date for the new buyer. Mr. Carr did not know
if an escrow will be established or if the work can be completed .on
time.
• Ms . Guy stated that Preservation Week is May 9-15 and that members
should suggest any events that they would like to sponsor. Mr.
Casey noted that the Historic Salem, Inc. annual meeting is on May
10, 1993 and that the Preservation Awards will be made at that
time. Chairman Oedel suggested that the Commission send out a
press release stated that the Mayor will make the presentations .
Preservation Awards
The following properties were approved for Preservation Awards :
In district:
34 Summer St. - Stephanie Fitzgerald (Peter Lenz, contractor)
115 Federal St. - Ingraham - fence
19 Fowler St. - Bean - paint & restoration
River Street sidewalks - several homeowners - cooperative
effort
12-14 Summer St. - Heller - rehab.
4 Federal Ct. - Wyke - fence
Outside district:
216-222 Essex St. - sympathetic window installation through
• side brick wall
452 Lafayette St. - long-term maintenance
• April 21, 1993, Page 5
f a.• _
7, 19, 21, 23, 25 Linden Street - longterm maintenance, ` "
streetscape contribution t' '
�.
29-31 Briggs St. y;•,
Salem Witch Trials Tercentenary Memorial
Lappin Park "
16 Williams Street - gold leafing
W
There being no further business, Mr. Carr made a motion to adjourn..
Mr. Casey seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so'
carried.
Respectfully submitted,
ggg�
Jan A. Guy 1
Cie k of th Commission -
1
�1
1
x R
• May 5, 1993, Page 1
SALEM HISTORICAL COMMISSION F'
MINUTES
MAY 5, 1993 ; .;
y'
A regular meeting of the Salem Historical Commission was held on
Wednesday, May 5, 1993 at 7 : 30 p.m. at One Salem Green, Salem, 'MA.
Present were Chairman Oedel and Messrs . Casey, Cook, Bailey,
Hedstrom and Slam and Ms . Guy. Mr. Carr entered later in 'the
meeting.
Violations
Ms . Guy stated that Certificates as to Violation were filed at the
Registry of Deeds for 10 Chestnut Street and 331 Essex Street. '
o A
Mr. Casey stated that the sale of 10 Flint Street did' not go
through as planned on April 30, 1993.
Y'F
111 Federal Street
Paul and Leslie Tuttle presented an application for a Certificate
of Appropriateness to paint the front fence, trellis, second floor
porch, and trim around windows and doors in white for their home at
• 111 Federal Street. The shutters and doors will remain dark green.
Mr. Casey made a motion to approve the application as submitted.
Mr. Cook seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so
carried.
5 Chestnut Street
P•
Due to a possible conflict of interest, Mr. Hedstrom abstained from
and left the room during discussion of this application.
Blake and Nina Anderson presented an application for a Certificate
of Appropriateness for their property at 5 Chestnut Street. They
propose to replace, below water table, a non-original porch with
installation of a railing. Also proposed is the replacement of
original lattice work above the rear fence and to replace the
driveway fence and gate. Drawings were presented.
Mr. Anderson stated that lattice will be placed under the new porch
and that the new porch will be painted to match the trim color.
Mr. Cook made a motion to approve the portion of the application
related to porch replacement, as submitted. Mr. Bailey seconded
the motion. All were in favor and the motion so carried. Mr.
Hedstrom abstained from voting. t
• Mr. Anderson stated that the frame for the lattice above the rear
fence still remains . Mr. Oedel noted the sections on the plan
rk}
?5
A> .
May 5, 1993, Page 2
where lattice is to be installed and denoted the area to be between
Point A and Point B.
Mr. Carr entered the meeting at this time.
y 8
Mr. Oedel stated that the addition of lattice should be contingent
that it is within zoning regulations .
vb r
Mr. Oedel asked what color the lattice will be painted. Mr. k
Anderson stated that he will use the old fashioned thick lattice - Al"
painted Essex Green.
Mr. Cook made a motion to approve the application as submitted for m
the portion relating to the installation of lattice from Point A to
Point B on the plan, contingent that such installation is within
zoning regulations and that the lattice is painted Essex. Green.
Mr. Casey seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion ,so
carried. Mr. Hedstrom and Mr. Carr abstained from voting.
Mr. Anderson stated that they proposed to remove the existing fence
from across the driveway and install a new fence closer to the
street. The new fence will be the same height as the fence at 1 ,
Chestnut Street. �*
• A
Mr. Carr asked if there would be a small molding around the lattice,,, , . y
inserts . Mr. Anderson replied in the affirmative. #t '
Mr. Anderson stated that the center panel will slide open and that'
the gate in panel #1 will be nearly invisible. ° x
Mr. Carr asked where the fence will be located in relation to the r�
>.
house. Mr. Anderson stated that it will fall between the two .. tz'
windows . 3°
Mr. Carr felt the fence was bold and ambitious .
Mr. Carr made a motion to approve the fence portion of the ; .r•
application as submitted. Mr. Slam seconded the motion.
Mr. Anderson stated that the landscape architect, Randy Weiting,
suggested that the fence be painted the body color of the house
with the trim and lattice being white.
� w
The motion was voted upon. All were in favor and the motion so
carried. Mr. Hedstrom abstained from voting.
Salem Common
On behalf of the City of Salem, David Pelletier, presented an
application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to, erect a
temporary sign on Salem Common from June 1 to August 1 announcing '
i
F "
" i
• May 5, 1993, Page 3 '
the weekly "Concerts on the Common" series . The sign will similar
to the Essex Institute Museum neighborhood signs . .; , `,
Ms . Guy felt that the application should be changed to Non-
41
Applicability, and stated that should it remain as Appropriateness :: ;
the Commission would have to waive the public hearing since, the
application was not received in time. Ms . Guy also noted that-Mr.
Pelletier has indicated that the drawing presented was computer . = yw
generated and therefore not exactly representative" of the ,t
lettering, etc. proposed.
y C
Mr. Slam made a motion to change the application ' to Non-
Applicability and to approve the application as submitted provided
that the sign and stanchion are removed by the end of the concert
series of Labor Day. Mr. Carr seconded the motion. All were in
favor and the motion so carried.
54 Turner Street r
A _
In continuation from a previous meeting, the House of Seven Gables
Settlement Association applied for a Certificate of Appropriateness
for the partial demolition of the existing Visitors ' Center, Coffee
Shop and toilets . Construction of new Educational Center, Museum
• Shop and Cultural space as an addition to the remaining portion of
the existing Visitors ' Center. Kitchen addition to the Retire r.,
Beckett House. The applicant' s were not present.
Ms . Guy stated that she spoke to John Serafini who indicated that
due to the pending litigation, the House of 7 Gables will be
downsizing the project by approximately one-half. The new plan
will go before the Board of Appeal on May 19, 1993 . Mr. Serafini
requests a continuance from the Salem Historical Commission until
June 2 , 1993 .
Mr. Slam made a motion to continue the application until June 2,
1993 . Mr. Carr seconded the motion. All were in favor and the
motion so carried.
Mr. Carr made a motion to communicate to Mr. Serafini that if there
is a material change in the plan, the Commission will require a new
application. Mr. Slam seconded the motion. All were in favor and
the motion so carried.
Other Business
Mr. Casey stated that 33 Chestnut Street is for sale and that a
realtors sign has been up for 3 weeks . Some members of the `
Chestnut Street Associates are concerned, since it is traditional
that the homeowners on Chestnut Street do not put up for sale
signs . Mr. Casey noted that the sign is free-standing. +'
qv
V�wYtf
• May 5, 1993, Page 4 ,
Mr. Carr made a motion to send a letter to Century 21 that the sign
must be removed and can only be put back if an application for a x f+
Certificate of Non-Applicability is submitted and approved. Mr.
Carr stated that the letter should be sent Certified Mail or hand
delivered. Mr. Casey seconded the motion. a"
Mr. Cook stated that there are for sale signs all over "the
districts and that to single out. the realtor on Chestnut Street
would be discriminatory. `
Mr. Slam agreed with Mr. Cook and stated that the Commission could
be sued if enforcement were applied discriminately.
Ms . Guy stated that a letter to all realtors informing them that a
Certificate of Non-applicability is required would be more
appropriate. Ms. Guy stated that the Commission could then wait a
reasonable time and address any and all violations . r
Mr. Carr withdrew his motion.
Mr. Carr stated that the Commission can only regulate temporary
signs with regard to duration of use, location, and lighting. Mr.
Carr felt the signs should not be free standing.
• Mr. Slam stated that he did not want to have to approve realtor,:t"..
signs and stated that to do so would further alienate people about
the Historic Commission.
Ms. Guy agreed that it would be a lot of work to enforce and felt r.
that the Commission would be accused of hindering people from being
able to sell their homes in an already slow housing market.
Mr. Bailey felt that the Chestnut Street Associates should meet
with the realtor/realtors .
Mr. Carr made motion to send a letter to Century 21 which requests
that they submit an application for a Certificate of Non-
Applicability and that the Commission set reasonable parameters for
For Sale signs . Mr. Casey seconded the motion.
Mr. Oedel stated that while the sign may be in poor taste, it is
still a temporary sign and that the Commission should enforce
uniformly or not enforce at all . Mr. Oedel suggested a letter be
sent to all realtors reminding them that any sign requires a
Certificate of Non-Applicability. The Commission can then decide
if they want to enforce violators .
The motion was voted upon. Messrs . Carr, Casey and Hedstrom voted
• in favor. Messrs . Oedel, Cook, Slam and Bailey voted in
opposition. The motion did not carry.
May 5, 1993, Page 5
Minutes
Mr. Casey that on Page 2, Mr. Carr is noted as replying to his own
question. Ms . Guy stated that she will amend showing Mr. Oedel
asking the question and will also change Page 5 to show the Salem '.
Witch Trials Tercentenary Memorial receiving an award - not
Witchcraft Heights Park. Mr. Carr asked that the minutes be r,
approved at the next meeting.
Other Business
Ms . Guy stated that a letter was sent to the National Park Service
(NPS) stating that the Commission has not been given the ¢ I
opportunity to comment on the next phase of the improvements.
Massachusetts Historical Commission (MHC) has requested that the
Commission, MHC, and NPS meet in Salem for the plans to be
presented on either May 26 or May 27 . Commission members preferred
May 27 . Ms . Guy stated that Colleen Bruce of the NPS has indicated
that graphics of the improvements are available for view at. the
Derby Street orientation center. Ms . Guy passed out excerpts.' of
the Phase 2 plans .
Ms . Guy stated that the Commission received a letter from MHC to
• Boston University concerning the SESD receiving a permit for
archaeological data recovery. •:
Ms . Guy read a letter drafted for New England Telephone concerning
389 Essex Street. Mr. Oedel signed the letter for mailing. Ms .
Guy stated that she spoke to Warner Cable about removing excess
cable wires .
Ms . Guy stated that the letter to electrical contractors has been
amended with Mr. Carr' s comments and is ready for mailing.
A surprise dinner for Annie Harris will be held on May 13, 1993 at
7 : 30 p.m. at the Lyceum Restaurant.
Ms . Guy stated that Chairman Oedel and Mr. Bailey have been
reappointed and that Doug Kelleher has been appointed as a full
member. He will be sworn in on May 6, 1993 and will attend the .•
next meeting.
The Commission reviewed the revised section on Gutters and
Downspouts from the Commission' s guidelines . After some additional
amendments were decided upon, Mr. Slam made a motion to approve the
Gutters & Downspouts section as amended. Mr. Cook seconded the
motion. All were in favor and the motion so carried.
• Violations
Mr. Casey stated that 397 Essex Street has altered their rear
'b
May 5, 1993, Page 6
AA
porch. Ms. Guy will send a letter.
Ms . Carr made a motion for Ms . Guy to send a request for
enforcement to the City Solicitor for 6 N. Pine Street and 1-3 N.
Pine Street and a 2nd request for compliance to 333 Essex Street.
Mr. Slam seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so
carried. '
Mr. Casey stated that 20 Beckford Street is in the process ofi
replacing the clapboards on the front facade. Ms. Guy will send a
letter and ask the Building Department to issue a Cease and Desist ,
Order.
Mr. Carr stated that the City Solicitor has recommended that the ti
Commission change its violation policy to include that a letter be
sent to a homeowner notifying them that at a given meeting a' vote
is scheduled to be taken on whether to file a Clerk' s Certificate •.;
as to Violation. After the vote, a letter will then be sent to the
homeowner notifying them of the vote and intent to file the Clerk' s
Certificate in 30 days . Mr. Carr made a motion to amend the '
procedure as suggested. Mr. Slam seconded the motion. All were in
favor and the motion so carried.
♦ r
• Mr. Carr suggested that the Commission send a letter to the City
Planner which states that they are concerned about the proposal to
alter the landscaped sitting area in front of Weylu' s for parking. ;
Mr. Carr made a motion to send a letter. Mr. Slam seconded the
motion. All were in favor and the motion so carried. Mr. Carr
will draft the letter. y
There being no further business, Mr. Carr made a motion to adjourn.
Mr. Slam seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so
carried.
Respectfully sub itted,
i
C
Jane A Guy
Clerk the Commission
C:\jg\HISTCOM\050593
.f .
F
9999y
May 19 , 1993, Page "1
• SALEM HISTORICAL COMMISSION
MINUTES }
MAY 19, 1993
A regular meeting of the Salem Historical Commission was held on
Wednesday, May 19 , 1993 at 7 : 30 p.m. at One Salem Green, Salem, MA.
Present were Chairman Oedel and Messrs . Bailey, Hedstrom, Cook and Carr
and Ms . Guy. Mr. Kelleher entered later in the meeting.
Violations
Ms . Guy stated that the bank whict, owns 331 Essex Street has a potential
buyer for the property. The bank is planning on completing tti4 ,
outstanding work. The same bank owns 10 Chestnut Street, but cannot get,
on the property as yet, since Mr. Howe is still living there.
Ms . Guy stated that the potential buyers of 10 Flint Street have no
closed on the property due to Mr. Brice having lost his job., He '[hus, i
have several pay stubs from his new job before the mortgage company wiIV T
liT' , i
agree to proceed.
Mr. Carr stated that the owners of 86 Federal Street starte t Ohl
construction wooden planter walls last week. Mr. Carr stated ttat- hey *,. : #
advised them not to complete the work without approval, but the work, has�
• proceeded. Mr. Carr noted that they were denied approval for thisAilw !
the past. Ms . Guy will send a letter.
Mr. Hedstrom stated that 10 Hamilton Street has constructed a fenceA",
between their house and the house on the corner of Chestnut Street •Ms
Guy will send a letter. _
a
Mr. Kelleher joined the meeting at this time. :
391 Essex Street gars
Herbert Weston and Barromee Dube presented an application for
Certificate of Appropriateness for the approval of a fence
constructed at 391 Essex Street. -i'
Mr. Dube stated that the fence is a two panel fence installed for tenant .T
privacy. Mr. Dube stated that it is on hangers in the event that it
needs to be removed. Mr. Dube stated that he spoke to Dr. Keach and Ms .
Meadowcroft and that they had no objections .
Mr. Oedel asked about paint. Mr. Dube asked if the Commission preferred
natural or paint. R
Mr. Oedel asked if there was any public comment. There was no public
comment.
• Mr. Carr asked the consensus on stain. Mr. Cook preferred natural
weathering. Mr. Dube stated that he preferred not to paint it white.
Mr. Carr stated that natural is more rustic, while stain is more
finished. Mr. Carr felt the fence as designed was not a major'
v
e
1
'3.
May 19 , 1993, Page 2 ,
• architectural element for this property. Mr. Carr suggested Cabot- grey
or black to match the shutters .
Mr. Carr made a motion to approve the application as submitted .with the
applicant to have the option of natural or solid color stain in. grey,
red or buff. Mr. Cook seconded the motion. All were in , favor and the
motion so carried.
Webb Street Multi-Purpose Trail �*
s
Ms . Juli Riemenschneider presented planting and materials plans for the
Webb/Bridge Street improvements as part of the SESD secondary treatment
plant project. Ms . Guy noted that the commission had previously
concurred with a Massachusetts Historic Commission letter concerning
this intersection regarding brickwork and trees . Ms . Guy stated that in..
order to expedite the 106 Review, the Commission is receiving these`;
plans directly rather than through Massachusetts Historical Commission4\
(MHC) .
Ms . Riemenschneider stated that SESD is enlarging Webb Street and the )
radius at Webb/Bridge Street. SESD is paying for the construction of-a '
bike trail from Bridge Street to the rear of the store at Collins/Webb
Streets . Ms . Riemenschneider stated that it will be a bituminous trail
with substantial plantings . Some existing trees will remain. There
• will be brick paving on the corner of Bridge and Webb. The benches and
trash receptacles will be the same as Lappin Park. There will be a" ,
wooden stockade fence. Ms . Riemenschneider stated that SESD would not a
agree to a more appropriate and expensive fence.
Mr. Hedstrom felt the plans looked nice.
Mr. Bailey was concerned that the grade level appeared higher than the
adjacent houses and questioned if there would be run-off problems . Ms .
Riemenschneider stated that Rizzo Associates did a draining plan, that
there are drain inlets and there will be a swail .
Ms . Riemenschneider stated that the light fixtures do not match those on -,
Derby Street, but will be cobra heads being installed on existing
utility poles .
Mr. Kelleher abstained from discussion due to his employment with MHC.
Mr. Carr was concerned about the trade and hoped the trees would be
substantial . Mr. Carr stated that he did not like the cobra lighting
and he would like to see the same lighting as around Collins Cove. Mr.
Carr stated that the finish side of the fence should face the walkway.
Mr. Cook was concerned with the drainage.
Mr. Hedstrom was concerned with the bituminous . Ms . Riemenschneider
• stated that there were maintenance and handicap access problems with
stonedust. Mr. Oedel stated that there are maintenance problems with
asphalt as well .
f �
May 19, 1993,, Page 3 /
� 1
Mr. Oedel was concerned about the stockade fence and light fixtures .
F
Mr. Carr made a motion that the Commissions comments should encompass .y+
the stockade fencing and lighting concerns .
E
Mr. Hedstrom felt that the communication should state that the ,
Commission is in approval of the brick work. ,n
Mr. Carr stated that it should also request substantial plantings with
the larger trees being a minimum of 3" caliper. fI
Mr. Bailey seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion sO�_ . .
carried. Mr. Kelleher abstained from voting. 9K
Salem Common '
Ms . Guy noted that the application to erect a temporary sign 'wae Iki,
approved under Non-Applicability at the last meeting. z" , '_ 4.
x
361 Essex Street §"
Alice and Timothy Clarke presented an application for a Certificatd-6
Appropriateness for the installation of exit egress stairs in thearea' ,
of 361 Essex Street. The applicants are potential buyers for th
property. Drawings were presented by their architect, Daniel Pierce: t
Mr. Clark noted that the top floor is an apartment but does ,note x
currently have a legal secondary egress . Mr. Clark stated that they
are no interior solutions and that the location selected is the lea$e '
visible. The stairs will not be visible from Essex or Chestnut Street' 1
Mr. Clark stated that interior drawings were available to show thaYr
there is no way to provide the egress inside the building. Mr. Clar
stated that the stairs will be minimally visible from Hamilton Street. '
from three building lots away.
Mr. Hedstrom visited the site on behalf of the Commission.
Mr. Oedel asked if there was any public comment. There was none.
Letters from William Guenther, 365 Essex Street and Commission member
John Casey were read which noted that they were in favor of the
application. ` .
Mr. Clark stated that he spoke to Annie Harris and Andy Lippman, 28
Chestnut Street, Lynn Frothingham, 6-8 Hamilton Street, Alice Johnson,'„' ,
4 Hamilton Street and Dr. Arrion at 359 Essex Street who were all in
favor of the application. Mr. Carr noted that he also spoke to Ms .�
Frothingham and Ms . Johnson and agreed that they are very much in favor'
Mr. Carr made a motion to deny a Certificate of Appropriateness, to make,
• the findings that the stairs as proposed are minimally visible only from*,'
Hamilton Street and there is no reasonable internal solution, and t'o
approve a Certificate of Non-applicability for the egress stairs ash,
proposed. Mr. Cook seconded the motion. g"
Y Y
p
i
t1ft f,y
May 19, 1993;
• Mr. Hedstrom stated that the design is as discreet as could possibly be •;
designed. Mr. Hedstrom felt there was no internal solution without
really chopping up the house.
Mr. Oedel asked if Mr. Hedstrom had any financial interest in this
project. Mr. Hedstrom replied in the negative.
Mr. Clark stated that he is proposing vertical ballasters .
Mr. Bailey agreed that there are no internal solutions and had no
problem approving Mr. Carr's motion. p
Mr. Kelleher asked the distance from the stair to the porch. Mr. Pierce
replied 51 feet. Mr. Kelleher felt the stair is a reversible alteration
which is better than an addition.
Mr. Carr stated that he would not approve the design unless is was . `
minimally visible from the street. Mr. Carr noted that the neighbors
are in favor and stated that the stairs were well designed. 1
Mr. Cook stated that the stairs are hardly discernable and that he was
in favor.
Chairman Oedel felt that it will be quite visible in the Winter from` % � )
• Hamilton Street but that probably on the second floor section will be,
seen.
The motion was voted upon. All were in favor and the motion so carried., �.•
M4.+
4 Andover Street '
Joel Caron submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness;
for the alteration of a garage at 4 Andover Street. Chairman Oedel read.
the 22 page letter which proposed to replace the original metal doors ..'
with wooden overhead doors, framed in wood with wood clapboards to match:''
the house over the doors . The letter stated that the garage near the .-,
corner of Chestnut and Hamilton Streets is an example of his proposal .'
Homestead Model 270 is proposed. The applicant was not present.
Ann Knight, 11 River Street stated that z of the rear facade of the',
garage is on her property line. The other z , which is painted brown is
on the 7 River Street property line. Her half is unpainted.
Mr. Carr noted that he went by the garage at Hamilton Street and felt it
was a reasonable solution. Mr. Carr stated that it is a contemporary
non-conforming garage and that the Commission cannot order the removal .
of it. Mr. Carr told Ms . Knight that the Commission' s jurisdiction is`
whether the doors are appropriate. Mr. Carr stated that he preferred
that the garage be torn down, but added that the Commission does not
have that kind of say.
Ms . Knight stated that if the owner is planning to fix up the front,
they should fix up the rest of the garage.
f•
May 19 , 1993, Page 5
Mr. Kenneth Thornton stated that the garage was visible from his
property at 15 River Street.
r ,
Mr. Hedstrom stated that he had questions about color and the clapboards '
over the doors .
Mr. Hedstrom made a motion to continue the application. Mr.. Carr
seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so carried.
Mr. Hedstrom stated that he would like a scale drawing of the .front and
would like information on the size of the opening and height, etc. ,,•
One Broad Street
One Broad Street Condo Association presented four applications for
Certificates of Appropriateness for One Broad Street.
The first application is to paint the front of the building and four
sides of the tower in the same color.
Mr. Carr made a motion to change the application to Non-applicability
and approve the application. Mr. Cook seconded the motion, all were in
favor and the motion so carried.
The second application is the remove the paint and rust from the iron "
' .
fence and repaint with black paint. The work may take two summers . • :_�
Mr. Carr made a motion to change the application to Non-applicability. t
and approve the application. Mr. Cook seconded the motion, all were in :
favor and the motion so carried.
r
The third application is to strip and paint the front door area, repaint
the front door panel and barrel vault ceiling which are both walnut with
cherry stain finish.
Mr. Kendall McKay, representing One Broad Street Condo Assoc . and the .,
person who will complete the work, stated that he will strip all paint'
on the entry to natural wood and stain with clear finish.
Mr. Carr stated that the barrel vault was mahogany and questioned if the .
sides were oak. Mr. Carr suggested that Mr. McKay try to match the
stain on the sides to appear the same color as the stained mahogany.
Mr. Carr made a motion to approve the application as submitted with the ,
stain color to be a mahogany solid stain with the final effect of the
entire to match the barrel vault. *%
f
Lauren Hutten, also representing One Broad Street Condo Assoc. stated
that the molding on the barrel vault is a different color and that they v
40 may want a darker stain on the molding.
Mr. Carr amended his motion to give the owners the option to highlight ,
all molding in a darker color.
f
t
w
May 19, 1993, Page 6 r-
• Chairman Oedel stated that it may appear strange to have the doors the N
same color as the rest of the entry. Susan Kassirer, one of thelcondo
owners, stated that the doors also have molding and felt that all the
molding was highlighted at one time. x' ;`, •,
Mr. Carr amended his motion to delegate Mr. Hedstrom to meet with the
applicants to finalize a stain color.
Mr. Bailey seconded the motion. All were in favor and the, motion so
carried. '
. k
The fourth application is to reconstruct the frame of the rear awning'
with a slight incline a the top for safety and drainage reasons and to
change the color to green. Mr. Ray L'Abbe of New England Awning was
present. t
Mr. L'Abbe stated that the color will be Hemlock Tweed and that he will ,
be adding a rectangular piece of approximately 6" with a slight slope to '
pitch water out. Mr. L'Abbe stated that the owners have had a .pigeon
problem along with water and ice build-up.
Mr. Carr stated that he saw the depression where water trapped after . ,
rain.
Mr. Hedstrom stated that he had no problem with the green although he
• preferred the previous color which blended in with the building. Mr. '
Hedstrom had no problem with the addition of a slope.
" rvi
Mr. Bailey stated that he had no problem with the application and liked A�
the color. Mr. Kelleher was in agreement with Mr. Bailey.
Chairman Oedel stated that the "cricket" will save the building fabric. •."
Mr. Carr made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Mr.
Hedstrom seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so
carried.
146 Federal Street
Esther Henry presented an application for a Certificate of :
Appropriateness to replace the stockade fence along Flint Street with a
fence which matches her fence which runs across the driveway on the
Federal Street side of 146 Federal Street. The fence will be white, 6 '
high, 3/4 thick by 21, wide, 40 ' long and capped. There will be a recessed '-
gate located at the stairs . No drawings were submitted.
Ms . Henry noted that there will be no lattice on the fence.
Chairman Oedel asked how far apart the pickets will be. Ms . Henry
replied 3/4. Ms . Henry stated that there will be a post between each
• section that won't be seen from the street.
Mr. Carr motioned that the Commission appoint two members to help
finalize the design of the fence and to continue the application until
May 19, 1993, Page 7 T ,
• the next meeting.
Mr. Bailey felt that 221 pickets, 6 feet high are very thin and suggested
3+° pickets. <,, ,
Mr. Carr and Mr. Hedstrom volunteered to assist Ms . Henry.
Mr. Hedstrom seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so
carried.
15 River Street y ,
Kenneth and Gail Thornton and Russell and Cheryl Jackson presented an
application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to add two black iron
railings to the house - one on each set of steps . The application
states that there is a set of two steps on the east side of the house,
set back 21 ' from the street. On the west side of the house, 23 ' from
the street, is a set of three steps. However, only two steps extend
beyond the exterior plane of the building. The railings would connect
to the house and extend (about 2 ' ) to the outer edge of the lowest step.
Sketches were provided when the application was submitted.
Mr. Thornton stated that his insurance company wants the, railings
installed as soon as possible. Mr. Thornton provided new scale #
• drawings. Mr. Thornton provided a list of signatures of abutting ` rt,
property owners who are in favor of the application. Mr. Thornton noted
that he was flexible on whether the steps should have one railing or
two. Mr. Thornton stated that the ballasters will be square, painted
black.
Mr. Hedstrom stated that he preferred double rails . Mr. Bailey was in
agreement.
Mr. Kelleher stated that he preferred single rails . Chairman Oedel was
in agreement.
Mr. Cook stated that he preferred double, but had no problem with
single.
Mr. Carr stated that he could not decide on the number of rails.
Mr. Thornton stated that he preferred single and that double would make
the driveway tight.
Mr. Carr noted that it was a narrow door and felt it may look like a lot
of railing. Mr. Carr suggested two on the front, formal entry.
Mr. Carr made a motion to approve the application for a solid wrought
iron railing with one rail on the rear steps which face 13 River Street
and two rails on the front steps which face 17 River Street. Mr.
• Hedstrom seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so ,
carried.
e
r rQj]j
May 19, 1993, Page`8
• 47-49 Washington Square North :.
Robert Sewall presented an application for a Certificate of Hardship to
replace a slate roof with GAF Woodline 25 year asphalt shingle on his r
half (47) of 47-49 Washington Square North. Ralph & Jeannette Countie' s
half (49) will remain slate. A cost estimate letter from J. B. Kidney
Co. , Inc. was provided along with a brochure describing the roofing
materials .
Mr. Sewall noted that the roof is leaking due to a storm which blew off
a section of the roof approximately 10 ' x 20 ' . It has been temporarily
patched. ' I 11#
Mr. Carr stated that recently on Essex Street an insurance company
wouldn' t pay for slate replacement and the applicant was told that since
he was insured, the company must put back what was there.
Mr. Sewall stated that the insurance company will pay for the`repair of
the section at $2300 . 00, but at the next storm, more would blow off and
he would have another claim. Mr. Sewall stated that it is $2700 . 00-for,
replacement of the entire roof in asphalt. The insurance company is
willing to pay the difference to replace the entire roof in asphalt.
Mr. Bailey asked if the intent is to replace 47 and 49 . Mr. Countie '
stated that it is a possibility.
• Mr. Carr asked if Mr. Sewall had received any other estimates for slate. 4,
Mr. Sewall replied in the negative and stated that he was willing to
try.
Ms . Countie stated that 49 will have to be replaced, too, and that both
sides cannot be seen at once.
Mr. Ted Richard, 35 Pleasant Street, stated that he did not feel the
proposal would have a detrimental effect. Mr. Richard noted that there
was no special ornate pattern or style on the existing slate. Mr. .
Richard stated that a similar asphalt product was used on 92 Washington _
Square.
William Toomey, 96 Washington Square, was in agreement with Mr. Richard. ,
Mr. Toomey stated that when the slate starts to break down, random
slates start to come off and someone could get hurt while the owners are
waiting for another claim to get additional replacement.
Mr. Roger stated that he preferred slate but could see the hardship.
Mr. Bailey stated he preferred slate but noted that when copper nails
start going, it is continuous . Mr. Bailey did not feel the cost for
full replacement was worth it and he did not feel it reduced the
aesthetics that much.
• Mr. Kelleher asked if the insurance company would pay for the slate.
Mr. Sewall replied that they will only pay to patch the damage portion.
Mr. Kelleher stated that he preferred patching to replacement in
asphalt. ,�
May 19, 1993, Page 9
• Mr. Carr asked if the insurance company is aware that the house is
located in an historic district. Mr. Sewall replied in the affirmative.
Chairman Oedel stated that it may take a long time of paying small
claims for slate for the insurance company to come to the conclusion to
pay for the full replacement of the slate roof . Chairman Oedel stated `
that it was a major roof in a major area. Chairman Oedel noted that a ,. ±`
slate patch will not match the remaining slate or the slate on the other
half, since inferior Pennsylvania slate was used. Chairman Oedel felt
the owner should try to get the insurance company to pay for the entire
half to be replaced in slate. P
Mr. Carr stated that if the insurance company fails to settle the,claim
fairly they could be in violation of 146D ( fair or deceptive practice) .
Mr. Hedstrom suggested slate alternative bids be explored and ttiatet' he
owner check more into the insurance company to have them replace with
like material .
i r
Mr. Bailey stated that it may be worth talking to a public adjuster.t'
Mr. Kelleher agreed that it would be worth pursuing estimates and
additional discussion with the insurance company.
M
Chairman Oedel felt it was a reasonable possibility to get a lower
iestimate and get the insurance company to discuss it further. Chairman .
Oedel suggested that the Commission deny the application so that the
owner can bring the denial to the insurance company.
".14
Mr. Carr made a motion to deny the application. Mr. Carr stated that,
if there are questions, the insurance company may contact the`<:
Commission. Mr. Kelleher seconded the motion. All were in favor andt;
the motion so carried.
84 Federal Street
John and Mary Wathne presented an application for a Certificate of .
Appropriateness to remove the aluminum siding and existing clapboards'.yt;
and replace with new clapboards . The application proposes to add J" or'1'
Y'4" rigid insulation over sheathing. Shingles are to be above eave line;''
clapboard to be below eave line, diagonal cut shingles at front and new-
corner boards will be added over existing. New casings will be added
and perimeter band moldings will be added to windows as required for
proper reveal over siding. The front strip will be reroofed with
appropriate material . Paint color will be applied for at a later date.
The project is to be phased with the front and right side done in 1993,
rear in 1993 or 1994, left side in 1993 to 1995 and porch to be cleaned
up with like materials in 1993-1994 .
Mr. Wathne stated that some issues may come up as siding is removed.,
• Ms . Guy stated that a member could be delegated to address those issues .
67_
Mr. Wathne stated that he will bring the clapboards z" out.
r
May 19 , 1993, Plage 10 `'
• Mr. Kelleher stated that it was great that the aluminum siding was being
removed. Mr. Kelleher asked if Mr. Wathne new the condition of the ^,
clapboards underneath.
Mr. Wathne stated that he did not want to keep the existing clapboards
due to lead paint issues . s
Mr. Wathne stated that he would like to make the judgement on the
casings in the field.
Mr. Carr felt the proposal was terrific. Mr. Cook was in agreement.
Chairman Oedel stated that z"-,'4 insulation tends to move moisture line
to the inside of the sheathing. Mr. Wathne replied that he was told to
put holes in it. Chairman Oedel suggested Tyvek. Mr. Wathne`.will talk .
to more people concerning the insulation.
Mr. Carr made a motion to approve the application as submitted and, t6
delegate Mr. Hedstrom to address specific design issues that may arise"
while the work is being done. Mr. Bailey seconded the motion. All were #
in favor and the motion so carried. *
t
Federal Street School Vents
t
i
r
• Mr. Wathne stated that he obtained an estimate from John R. Lutz Corp, ,
to fill in the air ducts at the Federal Street School . Mr. Carr� I
suggested that a copy of the estimate be send to the St. James Church°in j
order to show that the Historical Commission is not trying to holdup
_0
resolving the problem. '.:".„; ,
343 Essex Street "
Jonathan and Chris Wolff presented an application for a Certificate o +
Appropriateness to paint the fence at 343 Essex Street Cape Cod Grey an
the shutters to Corundum. Paint chips were provided.
Mr. Cook made a motion to approve the application as submitted Mr` s .
Carr seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so carrieds' ;. '
51 Summer/28 High Street
Walter Kallenback submitted an application for a Certificate of ;
Appropriateness for treatment of the front granite steps and to add
wrought iron railings . Drawings were not submitted. The brick wall in
violation has already been removed. An application for a Certificate of
Non-Applicability was also submitted to repaint the house in the,
existing color. The applicant was not present. t '
Mr. Hedstrom made a motion to continue the application for a Certificate
of Appropriateness until the next meeting. Mr. Cook seconded the,
motion. All were in favor and the motion so carried.
La
Mr. Carr made a motion to approve the application for a Certificate of
Non-Applicability as submitted. Mr. Hedstrom seconded the motion. All
{
May 19, 1993, Page 11
were in favor and the motion so carried.
Other Business
Ms . Guy stated that a Certificate of Non-Applicability was issued to 28
Chestnut Street for paint and fence repairs .
Ms . Guy stated that the Peabody Historical Commission is planning events
to commemorate the 200th birthday of George Peabody in February, 1995 .
They would like to know if the Salem Historical Commission would like to
participate in attending meetings to provide ideas and suggestions . Ms .
Guy will send a letter in reply, requesting that the Commission be kept
informed.
Ms . Guy stated that there will be a presentation of the Salem Maritime
Site improvements at the National Park Service orientation bulding''on , ,
May 26, 1993 at 11:00 am. The presentation is at the request & of ..
Massachusetts Historical Commission (MHC) to assist in the Section 1;06
Review process . Ms . Guy stated that the Commission received a copy, of
letter which states that MHC finds no adverse effect in a proposed '.
change from a sheet pile cell system to a lagging panel and tie-back
system for the wharf reconstruction. v
Chairman Oedel stated that a design forum and exhibition about the North - '
River Basin by students of the Boston Architectural center will be held
on May 22, 1993 at 10 :00 am to 2 pm at Hamilton Hall .
Ms . Guy stated that the City of Salem has received a $5000 Survey and
Planning Grant from MHC to support the Facade Improvement Loan Program.
Ms . Guy stated that a letter was received from Cindy Williams, 43
Chestnut Street, which states that the shutters will be put back by June
18, 1993 .
There being no further business, Mr. Carr made a motion to adjourn. Mr.
Hedstrom seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so
carried.
Respectfully submitted,
Jan A. Guy
Cie k of the Commission
June 2 , 1993, Page 1
SALEM HISTORICAL COMMISSION
MINUTES
JUNE 2, 1993 ;
A regular meeting of the Salem Historical Commission was held on
Wednesday, June 2, 1993 at 7 : 30 p.m. , at One Salem Green,, Salem, MA. ,-Lj4
Present were Chairman Oedel and Messrs . Casey, Cook, Slam, and Kelleher
and Ms . Guy. t3
Violations
Chairman Oedel stated that the Commission is preparing - an escrow,. }
agreement for the potential buyers of 331 Essex Street.
Ms . Guy noted that if the sale of 10 Flint Street does not go through
another potential buyer is waiting. ti
"
Mr. Casey stated that he and Mr. Carr are meeting with Massachusetts
Electric at 4 Andover Street concerning the electric meters .
C l A•
Mr. Casey stated that 131 Federal Street has completed the fence. Ms .
Guy will remove it from the violations list.
Ms . Guy stated that the owner of 398 Essex Street called to say they `.
• have finished the new railings and would like them to be inspected fs`
before painting is started. Ms. Guy stated that Mr. Hedstrom will be.
inspecting the railings .
51 Summer/28 High Street •_'"
In continuation from a previous meeting, Walter Kallenback submitted an
application for a Certificate of Appropriateness for alteration of the :.
front steps at 51 Summer/28 High Street. Mr. Lou Nardi represented the':'
applicant. A drawing was presented.
Mr. Nardi stated that the existing granite step needs to be lifted and
that new granite slabs need to be added in order to make a total of four
steps ( 3 steps & landing) '. Mr. Nardi is trying to purchase used granite .•
in order to get the same patina. The cement block piece will be " .
removed. A railing is needed for insurance. Mr. Nardi proposes two
rails of flat wrought iron. :,'
5
Mr. Casey and Mr. Slam preferred the square rail proposed. y
Mr. Nardi stated that he did not want to have a jog in the rail as
proposed in the drawing. Chairman Oedel noted changes and
clarifications on the drawing in red. The rail will not be connected to
the house, but rather a post will be added. Ballasters to be 6" on
center, 3/4" to 1/2" . / .
Mr. Nardi stated that the steps could either be all even in width or get
40 narrower when descending. Mr. Nardi preferred all even.
Mr. Slam made a motion to approve the application per amended drawings,
I F
June 2, 1993, Page 2
with straight rail, ballasters 1/2 ' -3/4" and steps of equal width. Mr.
Cook seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so carried.
146 Federal Street
Esther Henry submitted an application for a Certificate of
Appropriateness for fence replacement at 146 Federal Street. The . t
applicant was not present.
Ms . Guy stated that Mr. Hedstrom requested on behalf of Ms . Henry that
the application be continued in order to allow Mr. Hedstrom and Mr. Carr
additional time to work out design issues with the applicant. -
Mr. Slam made a motion to continue the application. Mr. Casey seconded
the motion. All were in favor and the motion so carried.
5 Monroe Street
k
Richard and Victoria Stevens presented an application for a Certificate
of Appropriateness to remove a wrought iron fence post from the right
side of the front fence and replace it with a granite block to match the
granite block on the left side. The iron fence post is to be re-used
for the fence by the front door.
• Mr. Stevens stated that the grey granite post is 11" square x 5 ' tall .
Mr. Slam made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Mr.
Casey seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so carried.
Ar
Mr. Stevens requested an amendment to his Certificate of Appropriateness
dated 11/5/92 to construction a lattice/shiplap pine wall to the rear of
the pergola. The lattice will be 11" with 2" square hole.
i
y
Mr. Slam made a motion to amend the Certificate of Appropriateness as
requested and to paint the wall to match the rest of the pergola. Mr.
Kelleher seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so
carried.
Salem Common Veterans Memorial
The Salem Veterans Council presented an application for a Certificate of
Appropriateness to alter the Veteran' s Memorial on the Salem Common.
The proposal is to surround the monument with a fence constructed with.
five 10" square granite posts connected with an "Anchor Chain" of 3"
links with a thickness between 3/8-1/2" . All posts will be rounded at
the top and be 3 ' 6" high. Mr. Jean-Guy Martineau, Veterans Agent for
the City of Salem represented the Veterans Council .
Mr. Edward Lewzinski provided a history of the memorial which was
erected in 1976 . Mr. Lewzinski stated that the shrubbery which once
40surrounded the memorial did not hold up and that the brick sidewalk and
cobblestones which once existed around the monument were removed by the t,
City.
A
f�
June 2, 1993, Page 3
Mr. Martineau stated that people often sit on the base of the monument :'
and at events held on the Common, vendors have attached things to it. :
Mr. Martineau stated that various discussions were held with the Mayors ' ;
office, Planning Department and veterans groups in the last 8-12 months
to develop a design.
e• _
Mr. Slam asked about the proposed ground cover. Mr. Martineau stated .
that they are looking for a suitable ground cover that can be best
maintained. Mr. Slam asked if ivy is a possibility. Mr. Martineau
stated that ivy is suitable. Chairman Oedel stated that periwinkle is
appropriate.
Chairman Oedel stated that the Salem Maritime site may have , surplus
chain available.
a '
Mr. Kelleher asked if the posts would be granite. Mr. Casey replied in
the affirmative and noted that the monument is granite.
• a
Mr. Slam made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Mr.
Cook seconded the motion.
Chairman Oedel suggested providing the option to make the posts lower.. `
Mr. Kelleher was in agreement, noting that if the posts are too high,
they will detract from the monument. Mr. Slam also preferred that the *-N '
• posts be lower. Mr. Cook stated that he had no problem with the height
and that it gave a stronger message. Mr. Casey agreed that the height
provided more of a barrier. :I
The motion was voted upon. All were in favor and the motion so carried. . �C
37 Chestnut Street
Mark & Helen Blodgett submitted an application for a Certificate of
Appropriateness to install electric service to the carriage house at 37
Chestnut Street.
Ms . Guy noted that Mr. Carr has been talking with the electrician and
that Massachusetts Electric has agreed to put the meters into the second'
floor interior and that the facade installation will be minimal .
Mr. Slam made a motion to change the application from Appropriateness t6.1
Non-Applicability and to approve the application due to being non-:
visible from the public way. Mr. Casey seconded the motion. All were
in favor and the motion so carried.
2 Botts Court
Stanley and Mary Usovicz submitted an application for a Certificate of
Non-Applicability to reconstruct the existing cooper rig cap and to
repaint the trim of the house in existing color.
• Mr. Casey made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Mr.
Kelleher seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so
carried.
June 2, 1993, Page 4 `,
• 54 Turner Street
In continuation from a previous meeting, the House of Seven Gables z,
Settlement Association applied for a Certificate of Appropriateness for !
the partial demolition of the existing Visitors ' Center, Coffee Shop and
toilets . Construction of new Educational Center, Museum Shop aw
Cultural space as an addition to the remaining portion of the existing
Visitors ' Center. Kitchen addition to the Retire Beckett House. The
applicant ' s were not present. „P
Mr. Cook made a motion to continue the application. Mr. Casey seconded
the motion. All were in favor and the motion so carried..
4 Andover Street ' L
t
In continuation from a previous meeting, Joel Caron submitted an
application for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the alteration of
a garage at 4 Andover Street. Chairman Oedel read the 21, page letter
which proposed to replace the original metal doors with wooden.overh-ead
doors, framed in wood with wood clapboards to match the house over the
doors . The letter stated that the garage near the corner of Chestnut
and Hamilton Streets is an example of his proposal . Homestead Model 270
is proposed. The applicant was not present and no additional`
information was provided.
• Ms . Guy noted that the concerns at the previous meeting were with regard
to paint, the clapboards over the doors and the size of the doors .
Chairman Oedel stated that Mr. Hedstrom had been concerned that the two 3y
doors might not fit in the opening. Mr. Kelleher noted that an abutter
felt that if the front is being altered, the back should be painted ,
uniformly at the same time.
Mr. Cook made a motion to approve the application as submitted provided
the entire garage exterior facades be painted to match the house color..
Mr. Casey seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so
carried.
1-3 North Pine Street
Pottery Realty Trust submitted an application for a Certificate of
Hardship for the alteration of doors at 1-3 North Pine Street due to
attempted break-ins . The applicant was not present.
Ms . Guy noted that the same person, Paul Zaido, represents both this
application and the following application for 397 Essex Street. The
work has already been completed which resulted in a Notice of Violation
being sent to the applicant.
Mr. Casey made a motion to continue the application. Mr. Cook seconded
the motion. All were in favor and the motion so carried.
• 397 Essex Street
Z & M Realty Trust submitted an application for a Certificate of Non- `
lir..
June 2 , 1993, Page 5
• Applicability to replace the rear porch railing at 397 Essex Street. y
The applicant was not present.
Ms . Guy stated that the work has already been completed which result ;q
in a Notice of Violation being sent to the applicant. Ms . Guy statiln"
3
that Mr. Zaido provided photographs showing pieces of the old wood ne .to the new railing and that he indicated that the porch was replaced
kind.
Mr. Cook made a motion to continue the application. Mr. Kelleher
seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so carried.
Salem Maritime Site a
Chairman Oedel provided plans for the improvement of the Salem, Maritime
Site and described the project as well as summarized the meeting held on
May 26, 1993 at the site with National Park Service and Massachusetts
Historical Commission (MHC) officials .
Chairman Oedel suggested that the entrance from Pickering Wharf not be
closed off during operating hours .
Chairman Oedel felt the Commission' s comments might have an impact on.
the treatment of the 5th building and the Wharfingers building.
• Mr. Slam was opposed to the construction of the buildings altogether.
Mr. Cook made a motion to delegate Chairman Oedel the task of providing
comment under the Section 106 Review process . Mr. Slam seconded the a
motion. All were in favor and the motion so carried.
SESD - Webb Street corridor
Chairman Oedel stated that the Commission was sent plans which encompass", :•
the improvements from Bridge/Webb Streets to Fort Avenue in order to
comment under the Section 106 Review process . Chairman Oedel noted that,
landscape plans were not provided and therefore there is not enough
information to comment. Chairman Oedel will so inform MHC.
North River Corridor
Chairman Oedel stated that he had a meeting with William Luster, City .
Planner, and indicated that the Commission would like to be a catalyst
to have Salem do work along the North River corridor like Peabody is
doing. Chairman Oedel stated that Peabody is holding a design contest
and suggested that a member of the Commission try to get on the awards
committee.
Mr. Casey stated that Historic Salem, Inc. is making an overlay to show
where the blank spots are in trails from the Peabody line to the
Salem/Beverly Bridge.
Other Business r
y
e �r
7� k
{
L
June 2 , 1993, Page 6
Ms . Guy stated that Betsy Burns has contacted her concerning the re-
installation of the newspaper vending box at the corner of Beckford and
Federal Street. The corner store has gone out of business . Ms . Guy
stated that Ms . Burns informed her that Joan Griffin has spoke to a M#:.
Littlefield at the Salem News who informed her that the Salem News has
never received a letter indicating that they must apply for approva- .
Mr. Littlefield apparently indicated that they would not apply. M''7:
Burns and Ms . Griffin would like the issue on the next Commission
agenda. Mr. Slam and Chairman Oedel were not comfortable with putting
it on the next agenda. Chairman Oedel suggested that Ms . Burns contact 1
him.
Ms . Guy stated that the Commission received a copy of a letter to the '
Society of War and Culture from MHC concerning there interest in a grant
for 1 Brown Street.
A
Minutes +-
Mr. Slam made a motion to approve the minutes of May 5, 1993 . Mr. Cook
seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so carried.
There being no further business, Mr. Slam made a motion to adjourn. Mr.- j
Kelleher seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so
carried. °
Respectfull . submitted, 4
J ne A. /
erk of the Commission
y .
40
• June 16, 1993, Page 1 f "
SALEM HISTORICAL COMMISSION
MINUTES
JUNE 16 , 1993
A regular meeting of the Salem Historical Commission was held on
Wednesday, June 16, 1993 at 7 : 30 p.m. at One Salem Green. Present
were Chairman Oedel and Messrs . Casey, Kelleher and Carr.
Violations/Work Status "
Ms . Guy stated that the Commission received a letter from the owner
of 3 Eaton Place stating that the work is completed and that the
owner would like the work inspected prior to painting.
Mr. Carr stated that he and Mr. Hedstrom inspected 398 Essex Street,:
and they do not feel that the rail and post are as approved.,:
Mr. Oedel stated that the bank has not sold 331 Essex Street due to
the seller awaiting a lodging house license.
146 Federal Street
In continuation from a previous meeting, Esther Henry presented an
• application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to replace a fence
at her home at 146 Federal Street. f
Mr. Carr stated that he and Mr. Hedstrom met with Ms . Henry. The
proposed fence will duplicate the fence at the driveway but will be
51 , not 6 ' as proposed, and will not have lattice.
Mr. Carr made a motion to approve the application to replace the
stockade fence along Flint Street with a fence which replicates, in
all respects, the fence across the rear of the driveway along
Federal Street with the exception that the new fence be 5 ' high and
no lattice to be on top. All dimensions to replicate the driveway
fence including width of pickets, and space between pickets . Gate
to be placed at the location of existing stairs . Posts will not be
visible from the street. Fence and gate to be painted white. Mr.
Kelleher seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so
carried.
Chairman Oedel stated for the record that a minimum quorum of four
members was present and that an unanimous vote would be needed to
approve any application.
1-3 North Pine
Paul Zaido ( 101 Lowell st. , Reading) and Vincent McGrath (4 Pond
• St. , Marblehead) , trustees of Pottery Realty Trust, presented an
application for a Certificate of Hardship for the front entry
r/
t )
• June 16, 1993; Page 2 ' 1
alteration at 103 North Pine Street. The work has already been
completed and the application stated that the removal of sidelights '
was to increase security. The application states that the owners
are willing to replace the doors, if necessary.
Mr. McGrath stated that the work was completed in 1985, that there
was a rotted section and water problems so that the doors would not ;k
close plumb. Mr. McGrath stated that the top lights were not a
original, but were strips of wood added to simulate glass:
x
Mr. Carr felt that the Hardship issue was caused by 'lack of Sx • 9
maintenance. Mr. Carr stated that the Commission must treat the
application as if the work was not done and decide if the work
proposed is appropriate to approve. Mr. Carr stated that the
Commission cannot approve a hardship that was self-created such as
a hardship to undo something done without prior Commission
approval . Mr. Carr felt that the work was not legally a hardship.
Mr. Zaido believed that the sidelights were not original to ..,.the
building' s construction.
Mr. Carr stated that the Commission would not approve sidelight and
transom removal if proposed before the work was done.
• '*
Mr. McGrath stated that, at the time, school children were $
consistently causing problems . Mr. Zaido added that the lights 9
were constantly kicked in.
e
Mr. Kelleher agreed that the alteration is not in keeping with
historic architecture. Mr. Kelleher stated that simple facade
entryways are a major character defining feature.
Mr. Casey also felt the work completed was inappropriate.
Mr. Zaido asked if the Commission felt the sidelights and transom
were original to that building. Chairman Oedel stated that they
may not be original .
Mr. Carr stated that the creation of a district freezes the
district in time. Mr. Carr stated that the Commission was not
saying that sidelights are the only appropriate treatment, but that
what was put in is inappropriate. Mr. Carr stated that the
applicants could either replicate what was once there or present a
new proposal for another treatment.
Chairman Oedel asked if there was any public comment. There was
not comment from the public.
• Mr. Carr made a motion to close the public hearing. Mr. Casey
seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so carried.
June 16, 1993, Page 3 ++ `
•
Mr. Carr made a motion to deny the application for Hardships due to
there being no hardship within the meaning of the law. Mr. Carr
also added to his motion that the owners be instructed to restore +,r
what was there in working order or present a new application for
appropriateness . Mr. Casey seconded the motion.
• e
Chairman Oedel agreed that a Hardship did not exist.
The motion was voted upon. All were in favor and the motion so i
carried. o
Mr. Zaido felt that the Commission should be more concerned with
having something put in compatible to the building rather than
reproducing something that was inappropriate to the district. Mr. '
Zaido agreed that the doors are not appropriate. ti
S
397 Essex Street
Paul Zaido ( 101 Lowell st. , Reading) and Vincent McGrath (4-'Pond
St. , Marblehead) , trustees of Z & M Realty Trust, presented. an
application for a Certificate of Non-Applicability to replacea
rear porch railing at 397 Essex Street. The work has already been
completed. Pictures showing the wood taking from the previous
• railing were shown.
�c
Mr. Carr made a motion to approve the work as completed,
conditional on the representation by the applicants that the work
is a replication of what was there and conditional that the railing
be painted as previously existed by 12/16/93. Mr. Kelleher
seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so carried. -
167 Federal Street
Mary Lou Townsend presented an application for a Certificate of
Appropriateness to replace the front door and steps and add wrought,
iron railings to 167 Federal Street. The application is also to
remove a portion of the back yard fence and repair lattice work on .
the remaining fence.
Ms . Townsend proposes to remove the existing entry door and install
a Brosco F-66-2 fir entry door with Brosco B-200 casing. The r
existing stairs at the entry will be removed and a new concrete
footing will be poured. New wood stairs similar to the existing
stairs will be constructed and a wrought iron railing will be
installed. A sketch of the railing was provided. Ms . Townsend
stated that the fence portion of lower height will be removed.
Mr. Carr stated that he wished there was a way not to see the
• steady Brosco-ization of Salem' s doors .
Chairman Oedel asked if the glass light over the door was
• June 16, 1993, *Page 4
t
remaining. Ms . Townsend replied in the affirmative. u
Mr. Carr made a motion to approve the application as submitted. ,*
Mr. Casey seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so
carried.
4 Federal Court
Richard and Kelly Wyke presented an application for a Certificate
of Appropriateness to construct a shed off the rear of the tkitchen
el at 4 Federal Court. The shed will match the clapboards and trim
of the house. The shed will be constructed in a space that
measures 7 1/2 ' x 14 ' . The dimensions of the shed, shown . on the
application are 6 ' x 6 ' x 10 ' . The shed will be set back from the
front of the el by 3 ' . Scale drawings were also provided.
Mr. Wyke stated that the scale drawings show approximately 'a(".7 ' x
14 ' shed and that they are now proposing approximately 6 ' x • 10 ' .
The shed will not be right on the rear property line. Theeshed
will house bicycles, trash cans, lawn mower, etc.
Mr. Carr stated that the shed should not be on the same plane as ^�
the house, but should appear as an accretion.
• �+
Mr. Wyke stated that they are proposing to reduce the height of the '
shed to 6 ' at the lower roof height. a
Mr. Oedel read a letter from H.B. and J. N. Peabody of 6 Federal
Court in opposition of the application.
Mr. Wyke stated that the Board of Appeals has suggested that they
receive Historic Commission prior to applying for a variance.
Mr. Oedel read a letter from Jean, Richard, Dr. Jane and Constance
Arlander of 91 and 93 Federal Street in favor of the application.
Jessica Herbert of 95 Federal Street stated that she supported the
application conditionally. Ms . Herbert hoped that the Wyke ' s would
put up temporary 2 x 4 's with a tarp in order to see if the shed
will effect sunlight on her property. Ms . Herbert stated that she
was in favor of the application since it will remove the odds and
ends in the yard. Ms . Herbert suggested a trellis with roses be
put on the back of the shed facing her property.
Mr. Carr stated that the effect on light is a zoning issue which
should be addressed at the Board of Appeals . Mr. Carr asked Ms .
Herbert if she had any design concerns . Ms . Herbert stated that
she was in favor of the design but would like some treatment on the
• rear of the shed.
Mr. Kelleher asked if there will be a step in front of the door.
• :�r
Mr. Wyke replied in the negative. June 16, 1993, Page 5 '
Y
Mr. Carr felt the shed was an appropriate accretion to a building
which should be approved subject to Board of Appeal approval . Mr.
Carr stated that it is the kind of accretion that is evolutionary
and is in keeping with the style and scale of the house. - .Mr. Carr
stated that if treatment on back will be visible, the Commission
will need a drawing.
Mr. Kelleher stated that the shed design is in keeping with the
design of the house. Mr. Kelleher asked if the window will be 6
over 6 . Mr. Wyke stated that they have not thought through to that
level of detail .
Mr. Casey felt that part of the Commission' s authority is to
appropriately adapt period houses to modern uses .
Mr. Oedel felt the shed is an appropriate accretion and that; the
light question should be raised before the Board of Appeal. o Mr.
Oedel felt there may be difficulty getting the door and windo'W" .to
fit in the scaled-downed design. -.'
Mr. Carr felt there should be a site visit. Mr. Carr stated that r
• he does not want the shed to appear flimsy. y
Mr. Oedel stated that the new dimensions should be sketched out.
w
A site visit was scheduled for Monday, June 21, 1993 at 6 : 00 p.m.
Mr. Carr made a motion to continue the application. Mr. Casey
seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so carried.-
4 Hamilton Street
Alice Johnson presented an application for a Certificate of
Appropriateness to replace the existing outside front door with a
4 panel door to match the inside front door. The application -
states that the door will be painted to match the clapboards of the
house which is a little darker than the present door. The
application is also to repaint the house as necessary. An enclosed „
not states that the applicant would like to paint the door blue to
match the inside door and shutters and that it will be a little
plainer (CS289 ) than the inside door. Another option would be to
replace the door in kind.
Mr. Carr stated that the function of the outside door is to keep
out the cold from the recessed door, which is the main door. Mr.
Carr stated that what is being proposed is like having two main
• doors .
Chairman Oedel suggested that the front enclosure be removed
z •A
June 16 , 1993, Page 6 t sy
� r
completely. `
Mr. Carr made a motion to approve the application as submitted with
the door painted blue to match the shutters, but with a strong
recommendation to remove the front entryway enclosure and install Y•
a storm door which is a more appropriate option. . Mr. Casey
seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion o caf+ried.
2 Botts Court
Stan & Mary Usovicz -presented an application for a Certificate of
Appropriateness for improvements at their home at 2 Botts Court.
Drawings were presented. Ms. Usovicz provided a list of abutters
signatures and requested that the Commission waive the ublic
hearing. .
Mr. Carr made a moti a
Mr. Casey seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion .so
carried.
Ms . Usovicz explained the details of the drawing and stated that
they will bring back the pediments . Windows that they are
proposing to remove were built too close to the wall and cause '
• water damage. They are suggesting a bay window to replace the lost
light. They propose to put back the recessed entryway by deleting
the storm door in front. On the East will be new front door
treatment, brass rails and a new window at the interior staircase. +
Mr. Carr stated that the window is appropriate to a Victorian house
but was concerned about the pediment over it.
Ms . Usovicz stated that they will be removing 3 windows and.
replacing the porch. The stair will have bluestone steps .
Chairman Oedel stated that bluestone is high maintenance and
suggested another material . Ms . Usovicz stated that she would.`
change it to wood and also change the brass rail to wood to match.,
the cap at 6 Botts Court.
Ms . Usovicz stated that the decorative brackets will mirror the
brackets at the front door.
Mr. Oedel noted that the new window will be the same size as the
window he has noted as "W7" on the drawing.
Ms . Usovicz stated that the brick under the steps will match the
foundation brick. Chairman Oedel felt that wood would be more
appropriate with wood stairs . Ms . Usovicz stated that she will
• change it from brick to wood.
Ms . Usovicz stated that the roof over the porch will be rubber. 4
r
f
• June 16, 1993, Page 7
Chairman Oedel suggested tin. Ms. Usovicz was concerned about the
noise. Mr. Kelleher stated that most anything would be better than
rubber. Chairman Oedel suggested rolled asphalt. Ms . Usovicz was
in agreement. Mr. Carr felt that rolled asphalt is okay"on a flat y
roof but not on a hip roof. Chairman Oedel stated that there is
not enough slope for shingles .
Mr. Oedel stated that on the North would be a new atrium door and
on the South would be new pediments . Chairman Oedel felt there
should be additional detail on the pediments . Ms . Usovicz stated
that they will match the existing pediments on the dormers .:
Ms . Usovicz stated that the skylight on the West will use an
existing opening with copper flashing. Ms . Usovicz stated that the
bay window cannot be seen from the public way.
Mr. Carr felt the application was terrific. Mr. Carr stated that
the front door is a massive opening and the existing treatment
scales it down. Mr. Carr would feel more comfortable with a,,;ste
visit for the door. Mr. Carr was concerned about the pediment over,
the interior stair window. Ms . Usovicz stated that it would 'lie. a
glass pediment. Mr. Carr was also concerned about the bay window,
but felt if it could not be seen, it was not within the
• Commission' s jurisdiction. {
Mr. Kelleher stated that he liked the pediment on the stairwell
window but felt that it would be too contemporary if it is glass . .. '
Mr. Kelleher felt it should match the other pediments .
Mr. Casey stated that he also liked the pediment, and agreed it
should match the other pediments .
Mr. Oedel stated that he was in favor of the work and noted that
the stairwell window will have six panes to match the first floor
windows .
Ms . Usovicz stated that the storm enclosure on the front door is
not permanently attached to the building. Mr. Carr felt it related
to the quoins and requested a site visit.
Mr. Carr made a motion to approve the application as revised and to
delegate the treatment of the front door to those who attend the
site visit and to approve a separate application for Non
Applicability for the bay window. Mr. Casey seconded the motion. `
All were in favor and the motion so carried. The site visit was
scheduled for Monday, June 21, 1993 at 5: 30 p.m.
Salem Walkways
• Mr. John Monroe of the National Park Service and Mr. John Tagiuri, ,
the artist for the project, presented updated information on the
r
�r
• June 16, 1993, Page 8
design and route of the Salem Walkways through the . McIntire
Historic District. Mr. Tagiuri stated that there will also be a . +
Forest River route.
Mr. Tagiuri stated that bollards will be used on the wider streets
and plagues, which will fit into the brick patter, on the smaller
streets . The trail head, which uses a bollard as a base, will be
cast iron with a bronze plaque. It will be located at the Witch j
House. There will be approximately 22 markers . it
t
Mr. Carr suggested that the plaques be located so they ,do not
remove any original brick sidewalk but rather sink in* a border
instead. Mr. Casey clarified that 24 bricks should not be removed
for a 16 brick width and then border the plaque in new brick. I
Ms . Guy felt the dual arrow directions would be confusing. ,
180 Federal Street
Edward Crowley submitted an application for a Certificate of
Appropriateness to replace all the clapboards at 180 Federal Street '
and to leave them natural in color. Trim to remain off-white. '
Mr. Casey noted that the pilasters were cut in half. Mr. Carr
stated that the sills had to be replaced and that the base of the
pilasters was odd.
Mr. Carr stated that he and Mr. Hedstrom had a site visit and
determined that the westerly side on Boston Street is original but
in deplorable condition. Mr. Carr stated that the east side is not
as bad.
Mr. Casey stated that the graduated clapboards on the west side
should be maintained and redone with caution.
Mr. Kelleher stated that original clapboards should be maintained
as much as possible.
Mr. Carr made a motion to permit the reclapboarding on the federal
street and Boston Street sides, matching the exposure and gradation
as defined on the Boston street side, to allow the repair and
minimal replacement of clapboards on the Flint street side with
shiplap (not butted joints) and to replace the Bridge Street side
which is not visible from the public way. The motion is also to
reject leaving the clapboards natural and that the applicant should
apply for a solid base color. Mr. Casey seconded the motion. All
were in favor and the motion so carried.
• 20 Beckford Street
Michael Cooney submitted an application for a Certificate of Non-
• June 16 , 1993, Page 9 '
Applicability to replace broken, cracked and damaged clapboards on � a
a section of the southern portion of the house and replace exactly
as clapboards were prior to the work. Clapboards to be stained to
match pre-existing paint. The work has already begun.
Mr. Carr made a motion to approve the application as submitted
noting that the paint color should match the existing. or the
applicant should come in for a new color. Mr. Casey seconded the
motion, all were in favor and the motion so carried.
182 Federal Street
Mr. Edward O'Connor presented an application for a Certificate of
Non-Applicability to repaint his house at 182 Federal Street in the i
existing color.
Mr. Carr made a motion to approve the application as submitted.
Mr. Casey seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so
carried. ,
54 Turner Street +
y.
In continuation from a previous meeting, the House of Seven Gables r'
Settlement Association applied for a Certificate of Appropriateness
for the partial demolition of the existing Visitors ' Center, Coffee '-
`
Shop and toilets . Construction of new Educational Center, Museum
Shop and Cultural space as an addition to the remaining portion of {
the existing Visitors ' Center. Kitchen addition to the Retire '
Beckett House. The applicant' s were not present.
Mr. Carr made a motion to continue the application. Mr. Casey +-
seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so carried: ..
Mr. Carr requested that Ms. Guy send a letter reminding the
applicants that a new application will be needed if the project is
downsized.
Other Business
Ms . Guy stated that Century Bank has provided a Certificate of
Compliance for her to sign and file with the Registry of Deeds .
Mr. Carr stated that he will review the Certificate and will inform `
Ms . Guy when the Certificate can be signed and filed.
Ms . Guy read a letter from Joel Caron, 4 Andover Street, which
requests to re-apply for a Certificate of Appropriateness to box in
the electric meters as described in his letter of December 22 ,
1992 . Ms . Guy will but the issue on the next agenda.
Ms . Guy stated that a Certificate of Non-Applicability was issued
for shingle replacement at 9 Cambridge Street.
June 16, 1993, Page 10 a 6
Ms . Guy stated that the Commission received a letter from MHC to
Camp Dresser & McKee concerning the Webb Street Multi=Purpose
trail, which concurred with the Commission' s comments . The letter
also states that they are unable to comment on the Webb Street and
Fort Avenue Corridor since landscaping plans were not included.
Chairman Oedel provided draft comments under Section 106 review for +;.
the Salem Maritime Site improvements . Commission members" should ?'
call Chairman Oedel with any revisions .
R
Ms . Guy presented a draft newsletter for the Commission's ."review
and suggested that members prepare narratives of any other
information that they would like to include. Ms . Guy suggested a
"How to" section, spotlighting a particular house or providing
historic trivia. Ms. Guy stated that the newsletter included a "
letter which the Commission received from One Broad Street Trust
which thanked the Commission for its support of proposed
improvements .
Mr. Kelleher stated that he recently considered purchasing. 26 .. * �
Beckford Street, but that there was not shower in the bathroom due ,
to the lack of ceiling height. Mr. Kelleher stated that Evelyn, o,
the realtor at Coldwell Banker, indicated that the current owner
• once considered constructing a shed dormer and received approval
from the Commission. Mr. Carr stated that the Commission has never'
given such approval and will contact the broker.
There being no further business, Mr. Carr made a motion to adjourn.
Mr. Casey seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so
carried.
Respe tfully s mitted,
f
r
Jane . Guy
Cler of the Commission
�y
July 7, 1993, Page 1
SALEM HISTORICAL COMMISSION
MINUTES o -1
JULY 7 , 1993
or 1
A regular meeting of the Salem Historical Commission was held on
Wednesday, July 7, 1993 at 7 : 30 p.m. at One Salem Green, Salem, MA.
Present were Chairman Oedel and Messrs . Cook, Bailey, Kelleher and Carr
and Ms . Guy. y
Violations
Ms. Guy stated that 188 Derby Street was supposed to provide pillar
design drawings by February 1, 1993 and complete the work by June 1,
1993 . Mr. Bailey questioned if the gate was put in the fence. Ms . Guy ! '
will check the fence and draft a letter. m
Ms . Guy stated that 3 Eaton Street still needs to be inspected and
provided Chairman Oedel with a copy of , the Certificate of
Appropriateness and corresponding approved drawings .
Ms . Guy stated that Mr. Casey was concerned that Warner Cable has begun r
their upgrading in the historic districts. Ms . Guy stated that Warner
Cable still needs to address 389 Essex Street. Chairman Oedel! :will
contact Warner Cable. t
• Ms . Guy reminded Mr. Carr to check into the meters at O N. Pine Street'.
t r
4 Federal Court
In continuation from a previous meeting, Richard & Kelly Wyke presented
an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to construct a. shed
off the rear of the kitchen ell at 4 Federal Court. Ms . Guy stated that,
the applicants would not be present.
Mr. Carr stated that at the recent site visit, the applicants provided
a mocked-up version of the shed. Mr. Carr stated that abutters Jessica
Herbert, Steve Gauthier and the Arlanders were present and that they
share the property lines where the shed will be located. Mr. Carr
stated that Ms . Herbert and Mr. Gauthier were in support provided the
gutter and downspout were brought forward and the Arlanders were in
support of the proposal . The consensus was that the shed should have a
window.
Mr. Cook stated that the shed looks like it belongs on the house.
Mr. H.B. Peabody stated that he continued to object to the proposal
because it shows a 40% change in the area from the original proposal and
felt there should be a new application.
Chairman Oedel stated that while the drawing submitted shows a 7 x 14
• shed, the application does state that the Wyke' s are proposing a scaled
down shed to 6 x 10 .
A letter in opposition from H.B. Peabody and J.N. Peabody and a letter
A
r i
July 7, 1993, Page 2
• in support from Jean, Richard, Constance and Dr. Jane Arlander were re
read from last meeting. W. -
Mr. Carr made a motion to approve the application as submitted subject +;
to the applicants receiving any required approvals from the Zoning Board `
of Appeal and to move the downspout to the Northeast corner of the
structure, toward the street. The motion includes the finding that the
proposed shed is complimentary in massing, scale, materials and design
and represents an evolutionary accretion common to 18th, 19th and early
20th century architecture which in no way detracts from the district but's
is complimentary thereto. Mr. Cook seconded the motion. All were in
favor and the motion so carried.
Also submitted was an Application for a Certificate of Non-Applicability
to replace sashes in the attic at the gable ends with like design and
replace the skylight in the roof with like design.
Mr. Carr made a motion to approve the application to replicate the F
existing and that there be no change in size, number of lights or their
division within the skylight. Mr. Cook seconded the motion. All- were
in favor and the motion so carried.
10 Hamilton Street/24 Chestnut Street
Barry Paul and Ellen Alexander presented an application for a
• Certificate of Appropriateness for the construction of a fence between
10 Hamilton Street and 24 Chestnut Street. The fence has already been
installed. '1
Mr. Paul stated that the previous owner removed the front Victorian r `
fence and that he is planning on putting it back up.
Mr. Carr stated that several neighbors have commented to him concerning
the new fence. Mr. Carr stated that the posts are not anything remotely'
appropriate and that he felt the picket design was primitive. Mr. Carr
stated that if the fence design had been submitted prior to its
construction, he would not have voted for it.
Mr. Paul asked what should be done. Chairman Oedel suggested that a new
proposal be submitted and that the applicants look through the
Commission' s guidelines .
Mr. Carr suggested that the applicants walk around the district with a
camera.
Mr. Bailey felt the height issues is key and that the iron fence needs
to be taken into consideration.
Mr. Carr made a motion to deny the application as submitted and to
request that the applicants submit a new application and drawings within
• 60 days . Mr. Cook seconded the motion, all were in favor and the motion
so carried.
r
J
July 7, 1993, Page
• 182 Federal Street
i,
Edward O'Connor presented an application for a Certificate of
Appropriateness to paint all trim work on house in Philipsburg Blue with
the exception of the teardrops (brackets) which would be Lancaster
Whitewash. The side porch would also be painted. The applicant was not .
present. k "
Mr. Carr did not feel that the proposed trim color was appropriate.
Mr. Carr made a motion to continue the application. Mr. Cook seconded
the motion, all were in favor and the motion so carried.
111 Federal Street ti
Paul & Leslie Tuttle presented an application for a Certificate of
Appropriateness to paint the clapboards Hawthorne Yellow and the '
shutters and doors Tarrytown Green at there home at 111 Federal Street. ry
Mr. Carr made a motion to enthusiastically approve the application as
submitted. Mr. Cook seconded the motion. All were in favor and" the
motion so carried.
9
357 Essex Street
n Yw 't U
• Quintet Realty Trust presented an application for a Certificate of .Non=
Applicability to paint the house in the same color and replace wooden
gutters with wooden gutters . '
Mr. Carr made a motion to approve the application as submitted provided F
the work is a replication of the existing in all respects . Mr. Cook
seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so carried. 4
40 Flint Street `
� ery
' 14
1
Barbara Hughes presented an application for a Certificate of Non
Applicability to repaint the exterior of the house light grey with white
.trim and Colonial Blue doors and shutters . The applicants were not
present.
Ms . Guy stated that she spoke to Ms . Hughes son who stated that the
existing trim is blue and the shutters and doors are reddish. Ms . Guy
stated that it was too late to get the application on the next meeting
under Appropriateness .
Mr. Carr made a motion to deny the application due to the work requiring
approval under a Certificate of Appropriateness . Mr. Bailey seconded
the motion. All were in favor and the motion so carried.
Mr. Carr made a motion to waive the public hearing and to approve the
• application under a Certificate of Appropriateness provided that after
required notification, there are no requests by abutters to hold the
public hearing. Mr. Cook seconded the motion, all were in favor and the
motion so carried.
9-
July 7, 1993, Page 4 A'
• 82 Derby Street
Louis Delafano and Steve Meader presented an application for a ,
Certificate of Appropriateness to replace 14 windows on the second floor
of 82 Derby Street to match the 6 over 6 windows on the first floor.
Ms . Guy stated that this is a request to waive the public hearing and
that the applicants submitted the necessary signatures from the
abutters .
Mr. Meader noted that the lights for the building are to be shipped or r'
received by July 9 , 1993 . w
Mr. Carr made a motion to waive the public hearing and approve the t .
application as submitted. Mr. Cook seconded the motion, all w6re in
favor and the motion so carried.
54 Turner Street
In continuation from a previous meeting, the House of Seven, Gables
Settlement Association applied for a Certificate of Appropriateness"for
the partial demolition of the existing Visitors ' Center, Coffee Shop,-and
toilets . Construction of new Educational Center, Museum Shop: and
Cultural space as an addition to the remaining portion of the existing
Visitors ' Center. Kitchen addition to the Retire Beckett House: ' .,Mr.
Brett Donham, representing the Gables withdrew the application. j
• The House of Seven Gables Settlement Association submitted . ab. new
application for a Certificate of Hardship for partial demolition of Oki
existing Visitors ' Center, Coffee Shop and toilets and the construction .. ' l
of a new Education Center, Museum Shop and cultural space as an addition
to the remaining portion of the existing Visitors ' Center. Mr. Donhdm
requested that the application be changed from Hardship to
Appropriateness .
Also present on behalf of the Gables were Ellen Winkler of John
Serafini 's office, Don Seamens, Cliff Hughes, Salty Smith and David
Goss.
Mr. Donham presented a new site plan and elevation drawings and stated
that they propose to tear down the 1959 addition and keep the tea house.
Mr. Donham described the differences in the previous proposal versus the ,
present proposal . Mr. Donham stated that there will be no changes from.
the garden view of the buildings .
Ms . Debbie Marcus-Bystrom of 42 Turner Street asked if any trees would
be taken out. Mr. Donham stated that one large and two small trees
would be removed and that there would be several trees planted.
Mr. Donham stated that the fence and shed will remain and that they will
close off one door on the East elevation.
• Mr. David Bystrom of 42 Turner Street questioned if a shed dormer was
shown at the neighborhood meeting. Mr. Donham stated that he did not
attend the neighborhood meeting but that the drawings being shown are
r
� �d
July 7, 1993, Page 5 ;`'"
• the same drawings from the Board of Appeal agreement. Ms . Bystrom wash
concerned that the drawings were not the same drawings approved by the
Board of Appeal . Ms. Guy will check.
r
Mr. Donham stated that the paint scheme and materials will be the same ?
as previously proposed. Mr. Donham stated that if the Commission did
not like the proposed windows, they could be changed to 6 over 6 . Mr.
Donham stated that the rain leaders will be encase din wood, that the
lighting is the same as previously proposed and that there are no
exterior lights on the building. Mr. Donham stated that the vertical
clapboards on the Retire Becket house addition are to remain.
Mr. Carr stated that the primary problem of the previous proposal was
always the size and that the fact that the footprint is reduced by 55%
is a major step in the right direction. Mr. Carr stated that he would
feel more comfortable if the Commission had a site visit. Mr. Carr
stated that the North elevation looks top heavy on the right and.-that he
would like to visualize it next to the Phippen House. Mr. Carr also ;�>
felt that the public notice should be expanded to the larger'
neighborhood. -'
Mr. Cook was comfortable with the legal notice requirement completed.-
. . , y
Ms . Guy stated that notice was provided to the Bystroms as a courtesy.
• Mr. Donham stated that he had hoped that by delivering the plans to* each
Commission member ten days before this meeting would help address any
..
issues .
.m
Mr. Cook stated that Mr. Donham spoiled the Commission last time with
mock-ups, but that he was willing to work quickly. Mr. Cook, however';
felt that a site visit was needed.
t
Mr. Carr stated that the reduction bodes well and that he would prefer'
to err on the side of caution. Mr. Carr stated that this is .a
completely new application and that it starts with a site visit. Mr.
Carr felt that it should be advertised to the public as broadly as
possible and suggested an ad in the newspaper. Mr. Carr stated that he
was generally in favor of the application, but was concerned about there
being fewer trees than before. fY
Mr. Donham stated that the special permit of the Board of Appeal
required a legal notice in the newspaper.
Mr. Bailey agreed there should be a site visit as a group.
Mr. Kelleher stated that he would not feel comfortable making specific
decisions until he stood at the site. Mr. Kelleher noted that he is a
Massachusetts Historical Commission (MHC) employee and that MHC will
also be reviewing the project.
• Mr. Donham stated that he was told by MHC that while they wish to be
kept informed, they were essentially delegating review to the Salem
Historical Commission.
July 7, 1993, Page 6
s, $y
• 4. A
Chairman Oedel asked about the wood screen. Mr. Donham stated that .pit ; '
is located on the flat roof (valley) between the two hip roofs which
will hide the air conditioning units, etc.
.♦
Ms . Bystrom stated that she apologized to the Gables for being such a
thorn in their side, but felt that just because they are the Gables
doesn't make them right. Ms. Bystrom stated that although she is aware
that her comments have nothing to do with historic appropriateness, she
needs to vent. Ms . Bystrom stated that the police were called three
times for rowdies at the Gables for an event that went to 10 :.30 p.m. and
that there were three weddings held there on one Sunday. Ms . Bystrom
stated that Jim Curran had 117 Derby Street demolished and said he would.
work with the Gables and nothing has happened. Ms . Bystrom stated that
her son applied to work at the Gables and that he was not hired.. Ms .
Bystrom stated that it was sad that neighbors cannot get along. and that
they were being pushed out of their home. r
31
Mr. Cook stated that he was not opposed to sending out additional public ,
notice. :++
i
Ms . Winkler stated that every effort has been made to give the public
information about the project.
A site visit was scheduled for Thursday, July 15 at 6 : 30 pm.
Mr. Carr made a motion to place an ad in the newspaper for the Ju'121`,
� .
1993 meeting. There was no second. "
Ms . Guy will post the site visit and meeting continuation at the City' '
Clerk' s office and will send notice to abutters both inside and outside
the historic district. <
Mr. Carr made a motion to continue the application. Mr. Bailey seconded
the motion. All were in favor and the motion so carried.
4 Andover Street
Ms . Guy re-read the letter from Joel Caron concerning a request for a
Certificate of Appropriateness to box-in the electric meters at-,14
Andover Street.
s
Mr. Carr made a motion to waive the public hearing and after the
required notice period issue a Certificate of Hardship for the
installation of the electrical meters as installed conditional that the
conduit be painted and that an upright, columnar plant be planted
adjacent to the bulkhead in order to screen the meters form Andover
Street. The meters are not to be boxed-in. Mr. Cook seconded the
motion. All were in favor and the motion so carried. Mr. Kelleher
abstained from voting.
Other Business
Ms . Guy stated that the City has received the Notice of Complaint filed
by 10 Flint Street. Mr. Carr stated that the City Solicitor will file
July 7 , 1993, Page 7
a counter claim to either enforce the signed escrow agreement or sue for '� y
sanctions from June, 1991 .
Mr. Carr made a motion to approve the minutes of April 21, 1993 and May
19, 1993 . Mr. Bailey seconded the motion, all were in favor and the d
motion so carried.
`.
Ms . Guy read a letter from Rev. John F. Leonard requesting permission to
vinyl side the rear and sides of the St. James Rectory. Ms . Guy will
draft a letter stating that a formal application must be submitted and
that the Commission suggests that Rev. Leonard consult the Commission' s e
guidelines concerning siding.
Ms . Guy stated that a letter was received from MHC to the National Park
Service (NPS) which provided NPS with the Commission' s comments „
regarding the improvements at the Salem Maritime National Historic Site.
I_
There being no further business, Mr. Carr made a motion to adjourn. Mr A• `
Cook seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so carried.
Respectfully submitted,
C1 rk oPhe ommission
i
SALEM HISTORICAL COMMISSION
MINUTES t "
JULY 15, 1993
The Salem Historical Commission was present at a site visit at the
House of Seven Gables on Thursday, July 15, 1993 at 6: 30 ppm.
Present were Chairman Oedel and Messrs. Cook, Casey, Slam; Carr and
Bailey and Ms. Guy. Persons present on behalf of the House of
Seven Gables included Cliff Hughes, Edith Harmon, Brett Donham,
David Goss, Campbell Seamans and John Serafini. Residents present
included David and Debbie Bystrom and Sophie Sawicki:. Other
unidentified persons were in attendance.
This site visit was conducted to facilitate the review of an
application for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the partial
demolition of the existing Visitor's Center, Coffee Shop and
toilets and the construction of a new Education Center, Museum Shop
and cultural space as an addition to the remaining portion of the
existing Visitors' Center. r
Mr. Donham presented a drawing of the proposed window design:+.
Mr. Donham identified where the corners to the addition of >the'
Visitors' Center would be located in the present parking area. Two ate"
maple trees will be eliminated. Mr. Donham explained the '
comparison in. roof height of the existing and proposed Visitors,! i
• Center. Mr. Donham stated that the new building consists of two Akl
gabled sections that will essentially replicate the existing gabled
section in massing, height and volume.
Ms. Sawicki asked if this is Phase 1 of additional phases. Ms.
Harmon stated that there are no other phases.
Mr. Carr noted that the height of the ridge pole in front of the ,
existing building will be lower.
Mr. Donham stated that the are not proposing to change the vertical.., - 4
siding on the existing building. The proposed buildings will be
clapboard. Mr. Donham stated that the two dogwood trees would be
removed and that all parking stays the same with the exception of
approximately two spaces closest to the Visitors' Center.
Mr. Carr was concerned about the loss of view of the Phippen House
from Turner Street. Mr. Donham will provide an elevation drawing
showing the Phippen House in the background for the next meeting.
Mr. Donham stated that the door that currently says "MEN" will be
clapboarded over.
Mr. Carr asked if there is a connector to the Turner Mansion still
being proposed. Mr. Donham replied in the negative. Mr. Carr felt
that the lack of the connector is a major improvement.
Chairman Oedel stated that the entranceway to the Visitors' Center .
will probably not be seen from the end section of Hardy Street. . '. •
Mr. Carr felt that the vertical siding should be changed tore
clapboards on the existing building. Chairman Oedel stated that he
was not as jarred by the proposal for retaining the vertical siding - `
after standing at Hardy Street for a short period. " �
Mr. Carr stated that he loved the changes, but questioned if the
three sections have to be equally spaced. Mr. Carr asked if they
could be moved in slightly so as not to obscure the Phippen House
from Turner Street. Mr. Donham stated that the spacing between the
sections is only 6' . Mr. Carr stated that it would not be, feasible
then. Mr. Carr asked if lowering the roof height of the first
building could be considered.
Mr. Donham stated that he is checking to see if they can keep the p'
existing electric service, thereby eliminating the need� lbr a
transformer. Chairman Oedel felt it would be easier to sight the
transformer now rather than having to accommodate it sometime. in
the future. Mr. Carr was in disagreement and felt that it should
not be installed if it is not needed. '
Ms. Bystrom asked if there were any more plans for landscaping °in
the parking lot area. Mr. Donham replied in the negative. $ 1 11 1),
Mr. Donham reviewed the proposed grade levels and landscaping ,in '
. front the Visitors' Center. ;
There being no further business, the site visit was concluded.
Respectfully submitted,
Jan A. Guy
Cl k of the C ission
R
• }may..
• July 21, 19:93, Pagel' `
A "
THE SALEM HISTORICAL COMMISSION
MINUTES
JULY 21, 1993
A regular meeting of the Salem Historical Commission was held on 4i
Wednesday, July 21, 1993 at 7 :30 p.m. at One Salem Green,- Salem, MA. +.
Present were Chairman Oedel and Messrs . Bailey, Hedstrom, Cook, Casey,
Carr and Slam and Ms . Guy.
Ms . Guy stated that there will be no meeting on August 4, 1993 unless
the Commission continues any applications on tonight' s agenda.
Violations/Work Status
Ms . Guy stated that the owners of 188 Derby Street have not submitted
final pillar details that were required by 2/1/93 . Mr. Bailey'.stated
that there was no gate on the fence as required. Mr. Carr made &:.motion -
to send a letter to the owners informing them that they are not in
compliance. Mr. Hedstrom seconded the motion, all were in favor and the
motion so carried.
Ms . Guy stated that 136 Federal Street can be removed from the violation i
M
list because they are coming in to the next meeting for porch
• replacement.
Ms . Guy stated that the landscaping has not been completed . at ,,,7
Carpenter Street. Mr. Carr made' a motion to send a letter stating that
they are not in compliance. Mr. Hedstrom seconded the motion. All were
in favor and the motion so carried.
Mr. Casey stated that the shutters at 43 Chestnut Street have been puts>•
back on.
Mr. Slam stated that the North Shore Weekly vending box is still
attached to the Common fence. Mr. Carr made a motion to send a second
letter. Mr. Hedstrom seconded the motion. All were in favor and the
motion so carried.
Mr. Carr made a motion to send a letter to the owner of 92 Federal–,.—, r
Street concerning the railing work that should have been completed by
6/1/93 . Mr. Cook seconded the motion, all were in favor and the motion
so carried.
Mr. Casey stated that Warner Cable has undertaken work at 313 and 389
Essex Street last week that was not approved and noted that a private
firm from New Hampshire was doing the work. Mr. Bailey stated that
Warner Cable did work at his property at 392 Essex Street, and with his
guidance, it was done appropriately. Mr. Oedel will contact Warner
• Cable.
r,
" f
3`
• July 21, 1993, Page X21
2-4 Gifford Court y r f
Donna & Phillip Yates presented an Application for a Cer-tificate of
Appropriateness for the following work at their home at 2-4 Gifford z
Court: Replacement of Carpenter Street window with wooden window, � .. :
replacement of back window to match existing window on other side,
replacement of existing porch with porch per drawing submitted,
replacement of molding around existing porch door to match window
molding, replacement of cellar door and replacement of cornice molding.
Mr. Yates stated that he already replaced the window and doors and that
the new door is steel .
Mr. Carr stated that 3 or 4 weeks ago, he visited the site to .stop work
that was not approved, including the doors and porch. Mr. Carr stated
that the owners had not obtained a building permit which was neecbed for K
the stairs . Mr. Carr stated that the restoration of the windows`.'and the
clapboard work was an improvement. Mr. Carr noted that the windows are
not an exact replication of the existing, but are very close. `'
Chairman Oedel asked what will be under the porch and stairs . Mr: :Yates }
stated that there would be lattice with a lattice door. Mr. Yates
stated that the upper metal door was there all along but hidden biy the
• porch enclosure.
Mr. Carr made a motion to approve the replacement of windows• -as
proposed. Mr. Slam seconded the motion. All were in favor and the;
motion so carried.
Mr. Carr made a motion to approve the replacement of cornice molding T
under a Certificate of Non-applicability. Mr. Slam seconded the motion:
All were in favor and the motion so carried.
Chairman Oedel stated that the porch proposed is the same style as
Photograph "A" and the drawing submitted (Exhibit A) .
Mr. Bailey stated that he had no problem with the proposed porch.
x
Mr. Carr stated that the Commission usually does not favor egress stairs:-- �
from the second floor. Mr. Carr felt it should be solved on the
interior. Mr. Carr also felt that since the door is now visible, it is
a change, that the door is not appropriate in style or material and that
the Commission should require the door to be replaced with an
appropriate door. Mr. Carr felt that, if the porch is approved, the
lattice should be thick and disguise the basement door.
Mr. Hedstrom stated that he had no problem with the basement door if the
lattice conceals it. Mr. Hedstrom stated that the lattice should be
• framed and have a watertable as per Photograph "A" . Mr. Hedstrom felt
the second floor door should be made appropriate.
• July 21, 1993, Page 3' ,
Mr. Cook had no objection to the porch and noted that, from Gifford
Court, it is not the second floor. Mr. Cook stated that he would like
the door replaced with a solid core raised panel door.
Mr. Slam felt the whole was a great improvement and stated'he would go
along with the porch if the steel door were replaced with a' wood door.
4
Ms . Yates asked if the Commission would consider a wooden screen. ,
Chairman Oedel stated that a screen is not under the jurisdiction of the
Commission and that it would not make the steel door appropriate.
Mr. Casey stated that the property was unique due to the grade change
and agreed with Mr. Hedstrom regarding the framing and other details of
the lattice. Mr. Casey also felt a wooden door was needed. .:
Chairman Oedel stated that he had virtually no problem with the `prop o5ed
solution with the exception of the top door. '" �±
_,A.<" •
Mr. Yates stated that he was willing to change the door.
tr
{
Mr. Carr made a motion to approve the replacement of the Carpenter I-
Street side porch with the porch proposed in Exhibit A and Photo;A
conditional that any zoning conditions are met, that the lattice below
• the porch/stairs is of heavy quality ( 1/4 3/8" thick) and sufficiently
conceals the basement door and that the watertable, framing, rail, 'sta ,,
treads, lattice, ballaster spacing etc. be completed as per Photo=-,',,X
r,-O ;4. .
The motion is also for the installation of a Brosco M-100 doorz,� obi,;
replace the door at the top of the stairs and to replace the mol" F
around the existing porch door to match the window molding." he: `
applicant will need to apply for paint colors . The motion includes:;tkje: '
work to be completed within six months. Mr. Cook seconded the motipn . ,
All were in favor and the motion so carried. ` '
54 Turner Street
In continuation from a previous meeting, the House of Seven Gables
Settlement Association presented an application for a Certificate of
Appropriateness for partial demolition of the existing Visitors ' Center, '
Coffee Shop and toilets and the construction of a new Education Center`".` '
Museum Shop and cultural space as an addition to the remaining portion
of the existing Visitors ' Center.
Mr. Brett Donham, representing the House of Seven Gables, provided an
elevation drawing of the site from Turner Street with the Phippen House
in the background. Mr. Donham noted that the landscaping was not
included in the drawing. Mr. Donham also provided a drawing of the
proposed Visitors ' Center with the two gables being lower. Mr. Donham
stated that he did not feel the lower roof lines would show more of the
Phippen House and that he felt that it did not look good from the West.
• Mr. Donham felt that the portion of the existing building remaining
i
• July 21, 1993, Page 4 srT
looks best with the traditional siding in which it was meant to look
like a barn. 9
Mr. Donham provided two construction drawings showing the placement of ..
the mechanicals that will not be visible. r
Mr. Bailey asked if Mr. Donham had received word from Massachusetts
Electric , concerning the downsizing of the transformer. Mr. Donham
stated that he has not gotten a reply and that he has included it in the
application. Mr. Donham stated that if it is not needed, he will notify
the Commission.
� s
Mr. Carr preferred that the Hardy and Derby Street sides of the existing
building be changed to clapboards since the design will no longer read
as a barn
Mr. Hedstrom agreed and stated he was inclined to want all four sides to
be consistent, but did not feel strongly about it. Mr. Hedstrom felt
the higher pitched roof should be kept.
Mr. Cook agreed the roof height should be kept but disagreed that the
existing building should be changed to clapboards . Mr. Cook stated that
he had no problem with the vertical siding. - 'q :M «
• l `
Mr. Slam stated that he would like the barn clapboarded since it�Na tiio .
longer reads as a barn. Mr. Slam preferred the higher peak.
a -•
Mr. Casey asked about paint colors . Mr. Donham stated that the red
the birthplace will be the color of the new building and the exist ng
building will stay brown.
Mr. Casey asked if they will be encasing the columns in trellis work.
Mr. Donham stated that it is no longer being proposed but could be added
11 back in.
Mr. Casey stated that he would like it to be re-introduced. Mr. Casey
stated that if the existing building required siding replacement, the
vertical siding could be changed to clapboards at that time. Mr. Casey; . .f .,
did not feel it needed to be done now. Mr. Casey felt the vertical °
siding shows the changes made over time.
Chairman Oedel asked if there entryway details drawings previously shown
would change. Mr. Donham replied in the negative. Chairman Oedel
stated that the Gables will have to come back for signage and lighting.
Mr. Donham stated that there will be no lights on the building.
Mr. Donham stated that he preferred the windows not to read as
residential and that the transom conveys that it is institutional . Mr.
• Donham stated that the smaller panes establish the historic scale.
Mr. Bailey believed that the Gables would need the light.
• July 21, 1993, Page 5
x,
Mr. Carr felt the windows could be deferred to the architect: ' Mr. Carr '
stated that the windows have a modern touch, but relate to the historic
buildings .
Mr. Hedstrom questioned the six over nine windows . Mr. Cook and Mr. `
Slam did not have a problem with the windows . Mr. Casey started that he
had not problem with the windows and stated that they read like a
schoolhouse, which is the function of the building. °
Chairman Oedel stated that he had no problem on the North side, but was x
concerned with the West and how the new windows relate to the existing.
Chairman Oedel felt the windows should be six over six. Mr. Donham
stated that they would then look strange since they are in the same room
and will be seen from the same view. n.
Q
Mr. Carr noted that the Phippen House will obstruct some of the 'view of
the North side.
Mr. Carr made a motion to approve the application as submitted with the
following modifications : To require the vertical siding be changed to
clapboards on the Hardy Street side of the existing building; to
incorporate all of the previous reviewed, pertinent detail drawings
relative to the entryway including lighting, glass, trellis, pillars„And
. landscaping; windows as drawn; and, does not include paint colors . + .Mr.
Slam seconded the motion. {'
• s
Mr. Casey stated that he would approve the motion, but preferred the
vertical siding remain. Mr. Cook and Slam were in agreement. F ,
Chairman Oedel and Messrs . Hedstrom, Carr and Bailey preferred
clapboards .
The motion was voted on. All were in favor and the motion so carried:
8 Lynn Street
Barbara Yagerman presented an Application for a Certificate of
Appropriateness for paint colors at her home at 8 Lynn Street. The,_:.,.
siding is to be Woodland Green, with Navajo White trim. The doors will
remain Burbank and the window and door accent will remain black.
Mr. Carr made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Mr.
Cook seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so carried.
84 Federal Street
John and Mary Wathne presented an application for a Certificate of
Appropriateness for paint colors and the alteration of window casing
• details at their home at 84 Federal Street. Mr. Wathne presented a
drawing showing the locations of the two shade of custom blue for the
body. The window sash will be Tarrytown Green. Mr. Wathne"'stated that
I f
I }
.l
n
4
• July 21, 1993, Page 6
y
the trim will be white, but a warmer white than hospital tone.
1
Mr. Carr suggested that the applicants consider Hadley Red for the sash.
Mr. Carr made a motion to approve the application for paint colors as '
submitted. Mr. Slam seconded the motion. All were in favor and the ``'•
motion so carried. = 'E�
Mr. Wathne stated that they planned on using band molding on the windows
but that Ms . Wathne preferred plinthblock and asked if the Commission
would consider it. Chairman Oedel suggested that they wait until the
siding is pulled off to decide. Mr. Wathne withdrew the portion of the
application relating to window details . Y .
386 Essex Street
Mr. David Clarke, representing 386 Essex Street Realty Trust, presented
an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to attach .a: steel
handrail to the main entranceway steps and repair rotten soffit; on the
front entry at 386 Essex Street. Mr. Clarke stated that his insurance
company is requiring the handrail and that he is proposing metal because
it is the least obtrusive and expensive. A drawing was provided,-,
. Mr. Bailey stated that he had no problem with the application.
Mr. Carr stated that he preferred the metal .
Mr. Slam felt the rail should go into the granite side rather than down ry
to the step. Mr. Hedstrom was in agreement x.
Mr. Casey felt the rail should be painted black.
Mr. Slam also preferred a thicker pipe. Mr. Casey suggested 1z-1$"
s:
Mr. Hedstrom made a motion to approve the application for the handrail
as submitted conditional that the rail begin from the granite side and
not extend to the step, that the rail be 1i-1j" round (outside diameter)
pipe painted black. Mr. Cook seconded the motion, all were in favor and-`"
the motion so carried.
Mr. Carr made a motion to approve a Certificate of Non-Applicability for, .+
the soffit repair. Mr. Hedstrom seconded the motion. All were in favor
and the motion so carried.
197 North Street
Peter Venetsanakos presented an application to Waive the Demolition
Delay Ordinance to demolish a garage at 197 North Street. Mr.
• Venetsanakos did not believe that the garage was over 50 years old.
Mr. Carr made a motion . to approve the application as submitted. Mr.
l +r
fjf
• July 21, 1;993, Page 7, sy.
t �
Cook seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so carried.
14 Broad Street
Steve Thomas and Evy Blum requested a waiver of the public hearing and =
presented an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the
demolition of a rear screen porch. The application states that the
screen porch was added sometime in the early 1900 's . It is not on
footings or a foundation and thus the undercarriage is rotten.
Elsewhere the structure contains carpenter ants which threaten the main
house. The porch is of no significant historical or architectural value
and repairing it represents a needless expense. The applicants propose
to replace the porch with a patio and arbor.
'A
Mr. Casey stated that he had no problem with the application. .`
Mr. Cook stated that the view of the porch is limited and that the it is
a non-descript structure - a 20th century addition.
:. .
Mr. Hedstrom had no objection to the application.
Mr. Carr stated that it was an appurtenance and that he had no problem
with the application.
• Mr. Bailey also had no problem with the application. `; •. r
Mr. Carr made a motion waive the public hearing due to the porch being
of minor significance. Mr. Hedstrom seconded the motion, all were in 4'
favor and the motion so carried. ,
Mr. Carr made a motion to approve demolition of the porch as proposed.
Mr. Cook seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so
carried.
Chairman Oedel stated that if the arbor or any new construction will be
seen from the public way, it will require Commission approval .
f
Mr. Carr questioned the status of the front fence. Mr. Thomas stated,
that it will be completed by December 1, 1993.
Mr. Thomas requested approval to repair the front steps of his home.
Mr. Hedstrom made a motion to approve a Certificate of Non-Applicability
to repair/replace the front steps as existing. Mr. Carr seconded the
motion. All were in favor and the motion so carried.
182 Federal Street
. In continuation from a previous meeting, Edward O'Connor presented an
application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to paint the trim work
at 182 Federal Street in Philipsburg Blue, except for the teardrops
July 21, 19'93, Page &
which would be Lancaster Whitewash. The applicant was not -present.
Mr. Carr made a motion to deny the trim color. Mr. Hedstrom seconded
the motion. All were in favor and the motion so carried., '. .
9 Cambridge Street
David Coyle requested a Waiver of the Public Hearing and presented an
Application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to repaint. his home at
9 Cambridge Street similar to the existing color as per paint chips
submitted. ,
Ms. Guy noted that a Certificate of Non-Applicability for replacement of
the front shingles was recently issued.
Mr. Cook made a motion to waive the public hearing and approve the ,
application as submitted. Mr. Carr seconded the motion. All.' re in
favor and the motion so carried.
85R Congress Street
John and Patricia LaForme presented an application to Waive �;:the
Demolition Delay Ordinance to demolish the garage at 85R Congress
• Street.
Mr. Slam made a motion to waive the Demolition Delay Ordinance due'to `
the building not being of historical significance. Mr. Cook seconded
the motion. All were in favor and the motion so carried.
{ `
South Essex Sewerage District
Chairman Oedel stated that reconstruction and landscaping plans for the
traffic improvements on Webb Street and Fort Avenue corridor were
presented for the Commission' s review.
Mr. Carr made a motion to delegate Chairman Oedel and Mr. Casey -to
review and comment on the plans. Mr. Cook seconded the motion. All,, ,
were in favor and the motion so carried.
Minutes
Mr. Carr made a motion to approve the minutes of June 2, 1993, June 16 ,
1993 and July 7, 1993 . Mr. Bailey seconded the motion. All were in
favor and the motion so carried.
Correspondence
Ms. Guy stated that an organization to Save Our Sculptures is requesting
• assistance in cataloging outdoor sculptures and is looking for local
contact persons . Chairman Oedel suggested that the information be
forwarded to Jane Lyness of the Salem Common Neighborhood Association.
July 21, 1993, Page. 9 a
Other Business
Mr. Carr stated that Tom O'Donnell has approached him concerning his
proposal to purchase the property abutting the Funeral Home on
Washington Square provided that he will be able to demolish the building
for parking. Mr. Carr felt that the Commission should try to persuade
Mr. O'Donnell from such demolition and to get the word out to the Salem
Common Neighborhood Association and Historic Salem, Inc that the "
Commission is opposed to such demolition.
; t
Mr. Carr stated that some of the proposed locations for the plaques for
the Walkways Project are within the antique brick. Mr. , Carr - is
concerned that if the plaques are removed at a later date, 'the holes
left will be filled with new brick that will not match the existing.
Mr. Carr stated that the plaques effected could be moved not more than
ten feet. Ms . Guy will send a letter to Annie Harris requested'a walk
of the route on Monday, August 9 . 1' �" "� ►
Ms . Guy stated that she needs the photography taken by Jack Cempellin
and Mr. Carr in order continue with the Washington Square District
expansion.
There being no further business, Mr. Slam made a motion to adjourn. Mr_.,_
Carr seconded the motion, all were in favor and the motion so carried','.'-.
Respectfully submitted,
J e A. Guy
C rk of th Commission
r..
r
a
l
+fro
• August 18, 1993,' Page 1
!4
SALEM HISTORICAL COMMISSION
MINUTES
AUGUST 18, 1993 ;•^ r
A regular meeting of the Salem Historical Commission was - held on y .
Wednesday, August 18, 1993 at 7 : 30 p.m. at One Salem Green.
Present were Chairman Oedel and Messrs. Cook, Carr, Bailey, Casey
and Hedstrom and Ms . Guy. Messrs . Kelleher and Slam entered later
in the meeting.
Violations/Work Status
Ms. Guy reminded Mr. Carr to look into the removal of meters at 0 ;
N. Pine Street and whether any violation exists at 192 Federal
Street.
82 Derby Street will be removed from the violations list. A ,
376 Essex Street - Mr. Carr suggested that a letter be sent saying
that due to a glitch, it would be unfair to saddle the new owner
with the problem of restoring the widows walk and porch rail askingi
that they pleased be preserved in hopes that one it can be re=
installed. Mr. Carr added that the property is a first-rate home'{..x
• of which the missing details were round off .
136 Federal Street
The Greater Lynn Special Needs Housing Corp. submitted an
application for a Certificate of Hardship to remove the existing ,
stairs, construct a porch with a handicapped ramp and construct a ' "
third floor dormer at 136 Federal Street. An application fora: "
Certificate of Non-Applicability was also submitted for the dormer.
Chairman Oedel read a letter into the record from Steven Glovsky .
opposing any change which would alter its appearance to distinguish
the building in terms of its place in the existing, historic
landscape.
Paul Tempesta, Director of Special Needs Housing stated that they
have been tenants in the building for over a decade.
Ms . Guy stated that she did not feel the dormer would be visible.
Mr. Carr felt that there should be a site visit to confirm.
Mr. Kelleher entered the meeting at this time.
Sal Bonura, architect for the project, stated that they will be
removing the fire escape ladder.
• Mr. Carr questioned if a variance will be required. Mr. Bonura
stated that they will not be constructing beyond the frame of the
• August 18, 1993, Page 2
r
yam« l
building. i
Mr. Carr made a motion to defer action on the dormer pending a site
visit. Mr. Casey seconded the motion. All were in favor and the
motion so carried.
Mr. Bonura stated that the State mandates ramps for wheelchair
clients and that they plan on relocating a door and combining two
sets of windows. Mr. Bonura stated the . porch stair will .;stay in
the same position and that his ramp design matches the construction
of the Bertram House ramps .
j'
Mr. Carr noted that the vantage point of "the Bertram Home and 136
Federal Street are very different.
Mr. Carr questioned why there is a hardship. Mr. Tempesta stated r.K
that an existing client living in the home has degenerated into a `
wheelchair.
t ;
Mr. Carr asked if they are required by the State to have ramp's:ekn•�
order to maintain licensing. Mr. James Chalmers, the constructior, q
supervisor, stated that he was pretty sure it was required and.,
noted that, in the event of a fire, a person in a wheelchair coui_d ,i
• not get out of the home in 2 1/2 minutes . w `'Ass.
Debra ,Thurver stated that if a client in a wheelchair continues tb.f,'
live in the house without ramps, they are not within their license.
They are required to provide the needs of the client or
discriminate by not allowing the client to continue to stay in the '
home.
Mr. Chalmers stated that they are currently rated under Ss631 and .
that the type of clients they now have requires them to upgrade to'
Ss636 Limited Group Residence. The proposed work will meet the ',':'1,
upgrade requirements .
Mr. Carr was concerned that, by updating a non-conforming use, the
home may loose the grandfathered approval for zoning such a use.
Mr. Carr made a motion to defer the remainder of the application
pending a site visit.
Mr. Carr noted that the Commission must review proposed changes as
they would effect the building' s original intended use and without
regard to current use.
Chairman Oedel asked if there was any public comment. There was no
public comment.
• Mr. Casey seconded Mr. Carr's motion.
t
• August 18, 1993, Page 3
Mr. Hedstrom asked if the work will allow them to increase the
number of residents . Mr. Chalmers replied that they are limited to } .
eight residents, which is the current number residing.
d
Mr. Casey asked if the ramp was denied, would the home loose its `,
license. Mr. Tempesta replied in the negative and stated that the
individual in the wheelchair would loose his home.
Mr. Bailey asked if the ramp could be hidden from Carpenter,.Street.
Mr. Chalmers stated that they are willing to landscape in:.any way
desired. Mr. Bonura stated that the ramp design can be changed to
accommodate any Commission concerns .
The site visit was scheduled for Wednesday, August 25, 1993 at ;
6 : 30 . „
The motion was voted upon. All were in favor and the motion so
carried. M
Mr. Slam entered the meeting at this time. Mr. Bailey excused
himself from the meeting. 0
161 Federal Street
• St. James Parish submitted an Application for a Certificate of Non-
Applicability to construct a wooden overhang over the rear door to '- '
stop ice buildup that prevents door from opening and closing, toy. ,
replace two rooftops on rear additions and to demolish fire escape
staircase at 161 Federal Street.
Mr. Carr made a motion to approve a Certificate of Non-4,:°`"''
Applicability to replace the rooftops over the two rear additions ' ; q
with exact replacements and to change the application for v,"
demolition of the fire escape stair to Appropriateness and approve 'a '
the fire escape demolition. Mr. Slam seconded the motion. All
were in favor and the motion so carried.
Mr. Slam stated that a drawing of the proposed roof overhang would
be needed. Chairman Oedel stated that a photograph of an overhang
that the Parish would ,duplicate would also be sufficient.
Mr. Carr made a motion to change the portion relating to the door I
overhang to Appropriateness and continue the application. Mr. Slam
seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so carried.
St. James Parish also submitted an application for a Certificate of
Hardship to repaint the 161 Federal Street in the existing colors
and to vinyl side the rear and a portion of each side of the
. building.
Mr. Slam stated that the Commission' s guidelines specifically state
• August 18, 1993, Page 4 6e.
that they would not approve vinyl siding. Mr. Slam stated that it
is not a hardship since everyone who requests vinyl siding does so
to save money. Mr. Slam stated that the Commission could not set
such a precedent. gip,
Mr. Carr made a motion that in compliance with the Commission' s
guidelines to find that a hardship situation does not exist and to
deny the installation of vinyl siding. Mr. Slam seconded the
motion.
b
Ms . Shelby Hypes, 157 Federal Street stated that she was
representing several neighbors who are all opposed to the .siding
and that she removed her vinyl siding last year.
The motion was voted upon, all were in favor and the motion_ so
carried.
Mr. Carr made a motion to approve a Certificate of Non-
Applicability for repainting in existing colors . Mr. Slam seconded
the motion. All were in favor and the motion so carried.
11 River Street
• Ann Knight presented an application for a Certificate of*w.,.
Appropriateness and requested that the Commission waive the public,,
hearing for paint colors . The body, trim and fence will be;-'.
Benjamin Moore Greenmount Silk, and the door will be Essex Green. ":_
The porch floor will be natural.
Mr. Slam made a motion to waive the public hearing. Mr. Cook 2,
seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so carried.{
Mr. Slam made a motion to approve the application as submitted. `
Mr. Carr seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so ,.. `
carried.
29 Broad Street
Cornelia Jones Gephart and Quinton Jones presented an application
for a Certificate of Non-Applicability to repaint their property at
29 Broad Street in existing colors .
Mr. Carr made a motion to approve the application as submitted.
Mr. Slam seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so
carried.
Ms . Guy noted that the color of the storms will require Commission
approval.
• Also submitted was an application for a Certificate of Non-
Applicability to repair/replace broken clapboards, rotted molding,
6
• August 18, 1993, Page 5
broken windows and broken shutters. '°Y +
Mr. Carr made a motion to approve the application as submitted
provided that the work replicates existing elements . and to
compliment the owner for an ambitious project. Mr. Carr stated
that the communication should state that the Commission hopes that
one day the roof ballastrade will be restored in order to top off
the work. Mr. Cook seconded the motion. All were in favor,and the
motion so carried.
3�.
N. R. Nominations
` t
The Commission requested public comment on the nomination of Fort
Lee, St. Nicholas Russian Orthodox Church, Salem Willows Historic
District, Winter Island Historic District, and Naumkeag 'Steam
Cotton Mills Historic District for listing on the National.
Register.
William Luster, Salem City Planner, stated that Shetland Trust; is
opposed to the listing and that the nomination can be withdrawn
only if the Mayor and the Commission request so in writing: Mr,;. '.
Luster asked if the Commission would support Shetland Trust.. "
objection for economic development reasons and not due to historic"I
• significance. Mr. Luster noted that the properties are going back ..
to the State board due to a technical error.
Ms . Guy stated that at the first State board meeting, there was`'.
considerable debate on whether the property was even eligible and;,.
it only passed by one vote. Ms. Guy noted that the Commission •_. ':
could re-nominate at a later date.
Mr. Carr made a motion, in light of the owners request, to' 3
reluctantly state that the Commission is not in support of the
nomination for Naumkeag Steam Cotton Mills and to communicate that
the Commission may choose to reapply in the future. Mr. Slam
seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so carried.
Mr. Kelleher abstained from voting.
Mr. Carr made a motion to support the remaining nominations . Mr.
Cook seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so ^
s°
carried. Mr. Kelleher abstained from voting. `1
188 Derby Street
Ms . Guy provided pictures of the fence at 188 Derby Street and an
historic photograph of the front pillars . Ms . Guy noted that the
fence does not have a working gate as approved.
• Ms . Guy is to send a letter stating that the gate is not as
approved and for the owner to come to an upcoming meeting.
• I
. August 18, 1993; Page 6 .
y.
Minutes
a:•rr.
Mr. Carr made a motion to approve the minutes of July 35, 1993 .
Mr. Slam seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion sora
carried.
Correspondence
Ms. Guy stated that the Commission received 3 letter concerning the
SESD:
Massachusetts Historical Commission (MHC) to the EPA regarding
sufficient archaeological excavations;
MHC to Camp, Dresser & McKee (CDM) commenting on the Webb &
Fort Avenue improvements; and
CDM to MHC concerning a protection plan for 2 archaeological-' 7
sites .
y �
Ms . Guy stated that the Commission received a letter from MHC ,to
Donham & Sweeney approving the improvement plans for the House. of •
Seven Gables . fir .
Chairman Oedel read a letter from the Salem Partnership concerning . '
the proposed plaques for the Salem Walkways which states that the ,
four which will be in brick will be anchored into 30" deep pre-caste,._ ,
concrete footings which will weigh approximately 200 lbs .
Other Business
Ms . Guy stated that Certificates of Non-Applicability were issued', `:
to 101 Derby Street for the roof, 106 Federal Street for paint, 124
Derby Street for paint and 7-13 N. Pine St. for paint.
P,
Ms . Guy stated that a violation letter was sent to 348 Essex Street
for gutter work. unapproved.
Mr. Casey stated that Warner Cable, though a subcontracted New
Hampshire firm, is going all through the McIntire district. Mr.
Oedel stated that he has talked to Warner Cable who stated that
three addresses noted at previous meetings were completed before
discussions with Warner Cable. Ms . Guy was in disagreement that
Warner Cable 's upgrading of at least 389 Essex Street was done
before Warner Cable and the Commission met. Mr. Casey stated that
Warner Cable has not come in for approvals as was agreed to. Mr.
Carr made a motion that Mr. Casey and Chairman Oedel meet with
Warner Cable and discuss individual properties completed
inappropriately. Mr. Slam seconded the motion. All were in favor
and the motion so carried.
Ms . Guy stated that the Commission has received some feedback from
the first newsletter including a positive note from Kelly Wyke, an
inquiry on available Commission slots, and a request for a i
{
• August 18, 1993, . Page. 7
subscription. Ms . Guy felt that several of the recent Non-
Applicability applications were a direct result of the newsletter.
Chairman Oedel suggested that the next newsletter which will
include information on the expansion of the Washington Square ' ,y
District, be sent to the potential new district homeowners . Mr.
Carr suggested that it be sent after the election so as, not to
become a campaign issue.
Chairman Oedel stated that a possible solutions to the proposed
demolition of the house behind O'Donnell ' s Funeral Home ',include
taking down the back ell of the house and the cinder block,-,,garage
or removing the fence to the dumpster area and getting an esement
to the Salem Housing Authority property. Mr. Carr also suggested
that both garages could be demolished and an easement be granted.
M j
.ros' T
There being no further business, Mr. Cook made a motion to adj.ourri.-. .. . .
Mr. Casey seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion .so
carried.
4
Respectfully submitted,
J e A. Guy
C erk of the Commission r• '
t1
.J.
.{ r
ps
• September 1, 1993, 1
THE SALEM HISTORICAL COMMISSION
MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 1, 1993
f
A regular meeting of the Salem Historical Commission was held on
Wednesday, September 1, 1993 at 7 :30 p.m. at One Salem Green,
Salem, MA. Present were Chairman Oedel, Messrs . Carr, Casey, Slam,
Bailey and Hedstrom and Ms . Guy
� B
Violations/Work Status
Ms . Guy stated that she received a telephone call from Eric Mysliwy
regarding 188 Derby Street. He indicated that the posts to make .
the gate were installed this week and had not been completed"
earlier due to financial constraints . Ms . Mysliwy asked if "".,they
could complete the columns by next Spring and not have to come 'to'
the September 15, 1993 meeting. Ms . Guy stated that she replied
that they should submit their request in writing.
Mr. Casey stated that 2 Flint Street landscaping is not completed
and that 92 Federal Street railings are not completed. Mr. Casey:• *'
stated that 1 Cambridge Street and 1-3 No. Pine have not complied.' :,
• Ms . Guy will send letters . %.
Mr. Carr stated that 7 Carpenter Street is complete. Mr. Bailey
stated that 162 Federal Street is completed. `
Mr. Slam stated that the newspaper vending machine is still chained
to the Salem Common fence: Ms. Guy will proceed with the next step '
in enforcement.
136 Federal Street .,
In continuation from a previous meeting, Greater Lynn Special Needs
Housing Corp. presented an application for a Certificate of
Hardship to remove the existing stairs, construct a porch with a
handicapped ramp and construct a third floor dormer at 136 Federal
Street. An application for a Certificate of Non-Applicability was
also submitted for the dormer.
Mr. Sal Bonura stated that at the recent site meeting, the
Commission asked for a pole to be put up indicating the visibility
of the dormer. Mr. Bonura stated that a pole was erected and the
area was chalked. Mr. Bonura stated that the lower part of the
second egress would be visible and the applicants have decided to
withdraw the dormer and fire escape portion of the proposal . Mr.
Paul Tempesta signed the applications as being withdrawn.
Mr. Bonura stated that the existing rear stairs will be retained,
the door will be relocated, three windows will be provided and two
. ve"
• September 1, , 1993, 2 .
windows will be combined on the side. The design of the ramp is
similar to the design details of the Bertram Home ramp. ,
Mr. Carr asked if, on the elevation facing Bridge, the ballastersy
would be continued where none are drawn around the deck. Mr. '
Bonura replied in the affirmative.
Ms . Joan Boudreau, 138 Federal Street asked how many clients reside r»
at the home. Mr. Bonura replied that 8 persons lived there. Ms .
Boudreau asked if the number would increase. Mr. Bonura replied in
the negative. Ms . Boudreau asked if the handicap access currently
there was inadequate. Mr. Bonura stated that there is no current
handicap access .
Ms . Boudreau questioned how they could operate without legal
access . Mr. James Chalmers replied that they have been asked- by _
the State to comply with access requirements . ,
c ,
Mr. Peter Sutton of 6 Carpenter Street asked if any new residents
have been added. Mr. Bonura replied in the negative. Mr. Tempesta
stated that a client moved in last year who has become more and
more dependent on a wheelchair and who is less mobile than when hey,
first moved in. Mr. Tempesta stated that they did not anticipate
• taking in a client in a wheelchair. Mr. Sutton noted that
providing access will allow more non-ambulatory to reside there in,`2 tl'. ,
the future. Mr. Bonura stated that the home had been cited.
Steve Glovsky of 131 Federal Street stated that the existing exit .,i;, tr
sticks out and felt that the proposed would stick out alot more. 'a :*
Mr. Glovsky asked if there was any way to enhance the appearance by 7
concealing it.
Chairman Oedel asked if the proposed will be closer to Carpenter
Street than the existing. Mr. Bonura replied in the negative.
Mr. sutton stated that the proposed will run longer along Carpenter
Street and felt there should be a large fence to hide it. Mr.
Sutton presented 3 letters and one petition as a history of
grievances regarding the home. Mr. Sutton stated that he has
previously requested a fence be erected and that there is also a
history of police involvement.
Ms . Boudreau asked who was in charge. of the home. Mr. Tempesta
stated that the Executive Director is ultimately and that there are
supervisors under the Executive Director. The home is funded by
the Department of Mental Retardation. Ms. Boudreau asked who the
resident in charge is . Mr. Tempesta stated that Kathy Goodwin is
the on site Program Director.
• Mr. Sam Vitale, Attorney for Greater Lynn Special Needs Housing
Corp. , stated that complaints regarding the home were made,when the
• September 1, 1993, 3
Association of Group Homes still owned the building. Atty. Vitale
noted that Mr. Bleau was court appointed as the receive of the
property and that ownership was taken over this year.
i
Mr. Sutton stated that the letters do pre-date the transfer of
ownership but that he had been in contact with Mr. Bleau, who
threatened counter-litigation. Mr. Sutton stated that the original
residents were marginally retarded individuals being worked back ++
into the mainstream and that there has been a change in that recent .
residents are highly retarded.
Atty. Vitale sited the requirements of the American Disabilities
Act (ADA) and various State and Federal laws regarding handicapped
accessibility. Atty. Vitale stated that a handicapped individual r` !,
has the right to access his home and that the Architectural
Barriers Board has jurisdiction even in historic districts .
Mr. Hedstrom stated that the Commission should stick to design
issues .
Ms . Boudreau stated that she lives next door and that her concern
is for the residents of the home and what they are getting out of
their day to day life. Ms . Boudreau stated that she has seen the' ` « '
• residents outside getting fresh air only on the weekends and sees
no supervision. Ms. Boudreau stated that she has offered food
(such as left over pastries from events) to the home but has , :"'-,,
received no response. Ms. Boudreau questioned who is caring for
the needs needs and if there was neglect.
a:. a
Mr. Tempesta stated that most of the residents work like everyone
else, Monday through Friday, and come home like the rest of use and
do indoor activities . Mr. Tempesta stated that there is over
27,000 hours in direct care per year and approximately 12 employees
with staff there 24 hours per day. Mr. Tempesta stated that their
dietary needs may be restrictive.
Chairman Oedel closed the public hearing.
Mr. Carr questioned if Atty. Vitale was representing that a group
home must have a ramp whether or not there is a client in a
wheelchair. Atty. Vitale stated that Title 3 states that one
cannot discriminate regarding ability, that the home is subject to
regulations which state they must afford access for life safety and
are subject to regular inspections by the State.
Chairman Oedel stated that Mr. Bonura mentioned that the home had
been cited and asked if there was a copy of the citation. Atty.
Vitale stated that they can produce and inspection report. Atty.
• Vitale noted that a client of the home has become non-ambulatory
` which represents a hardship.
r
• September 1, 1993, 4
Mr. Slam asked if they would consider screening the ramp. Mr.
Bonura stated that the van needs to be able to reach the clients . ,
Mr. Sutton felt that a fence could be designed that could
accommodate the van.
Mr. Glovsky suggested that the porch be moved in, since the door
was being relocated. Mr. Bonura stated that room is needed for the
ramp.
Mr. Hedstrom asked if a wheelchair lift was considered. Mr. Bonura
stated that a lift was aesthetically worse and that a ramp is
required by the Architectural Barriers Board if space is available.
Mr. Carr felt that the first question is if the application
qualifies as a hardship. Mr. Carr stated that the home has ay;lot` x+
of land with enormous potential for screening. Mr. Carr noted that
the Commission' s guidelines favor fencing at the sidewalk. Mr.
Carr felt that as designed, the view from Carpenter Street would
proclaim an institutional use. Mr. Carr stated that he had a
problem with the porch telescoping out.
Mr. Bailey asked if the existing porch was being enlarged. Mr.
• Bonura stated there is currently no porch. Mr. Bailey asked if the ;
porch was designed just for the ramp or also as a sitting place. ti
Mr. Bonura replied that the current sitting area is being lost by
the ramp and the porch will replace what was lost.
Mr. Bailey stated that when he visited the site he heard noise from
the home and stated that the porch will elevate the noise problems.
Mr. Bailey stated that even if there was no application for a ramp,
the home needs a fence for upkeep and as a courtesy for the
neighbors.
Mr. Casey stated that the Commission has jurisdiction over
historical appropriateness . Mr. Casey noted that the property is
located in a residential area and that the proposed design is
institutional. Mr. Casey stated that triple and double windows are
not appropriate. Mr. Casey felt that the ramp could be placed more
in the rear and that there should be a fence which is high style
and appropriate to Federal Street. Mr. Casey questioned the
replacement of aluminum siding that will be removed for this work.
Mr. Slam made a motion to continue the application until the
meeting of September 15, 1993 with a request that the applicants
submit a fence design and new window design.
Chairman Oedel asked the Commission if the application qualifies
• under hardship. Mr. Carr stated that if Atty. Vitale's
representations are accurate, there is a hardship. Mr.,,Hedstrom
agreed, provided the documentation was presented. Mr. Slam felt
September 1, 1993, 5
•
there was a hardship. Mr. Bailey felt there would be a hardship as
some point. Mr. Casey stated that the documentation should be {
presented.
Mr. Slam withdrew his motion.
Chairman Oedel asked Mr. Carr to research the ADA regulations.
Chairman Oedel stated that there are concerns on fencing, that the
porch length is too far down Carpenter Street and that the window
placement is not appropriate.
Mr. Carr stated that the only hardship can be for the ramp and that
the deck can only be approved under Appropriateness. t
Chairman Oedel and Mr. Carr did not know if the Commission has the•
authority to require replacement of aluminum siding with wood,-on
the facade being altered.
Mr. Bonura asked if planting would be appropriate for screening.
Mr. Slam did not feel planting is sufficient for screening for this
property
. Mr. Hedstrom felt that a fence and planting would be needed.
Mr. Carr stated that there should be a fence that reads like it was
already there along with supplemental planting.
Mr. Bailey felt that there should be a fence and the planting
retained.
Mr. Casey stated that there was no alternative but to install a
fence.
Chairman Oedel stated that if the fence hides some of the rear,
some work could be approved under Non-Applicability.
Mr. Chalmers asked if the fence was to hide the deck or the
clients . Chairman Oedel replied that it would be to hide the
hardship of the ramp.
Mr. Bonura stated that a parking area is needed for the van. Mr.
Casey suggested gates .
Mr. Slam stated that if the ramp is screened, the design issues are
moot.
Mr. Tempesta asked if the Commission was requiring that the
• historical metal fence on Carpenter Street be removed. Mr. Carr
replied in the negative.
v
• September 1, 1993, 6
Mr. Carr made a motion to continue the application. Mr. Slam
seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so carried. .
31 Flint Street
Dr. Robert Kemper submitted an application for a Certificate of
Appropriateness to affix a sign to the entryway near the front door
on the left side. Sign dimensions are 4" high by 18 1/2" long and
made out of cast brass . The application is also to install wood
shutters on the front of the house. Photographs of similar signs
and shutters were supplied.
Chairman Oedel asked the color of the shutters. Dr. Kemper replied
that the shutters would be painted black.
Mr. Slam made a motion to approve the application as submitted.
Mr. Bailey seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion
so carried.
177-179 Federal Street
Laskaris Realty Trust presented an application for a Certificate of
Appropriateness to make two non-operable windows operable and to
• replace and windows and/or sash and sills as required. Theodore J.
Laskaris represented the trust
Mr. Hedstrom stated that he had a site visit with the applicant.
Mr. Laskaris stated that he would like to replace all the windows
in phases as affordable and would start with the third floor
windows that are rotted or broken.
Mr. Laskaris thought 4 over 4 windows would be appropriate for the
third floor. Mr. Carr suggested delegating Mr. Hedstrom to
determine what lites would be appropriate for the third floor. Mr.
Bailey suggested 3 over 6 for the third floor.
Mr. Casey made a motion to authorize the owner to work toward a
long-term goal of replacing window sash on first and second floors
with 6 over 6 wood windows with intregal muntins and mullions,
clear glass and to delegate Mr. Hedstrom to determine appropriate
configuration of glass lites for the third floor and to determine
appropriate color of window sash and trim. All sash to be replaced
as affordable with no expiration of the certificate. Mr. Slam
seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so carried.
2-4 Gifford Court
• Mr. Slam made a motion for paint colors to be placed first on
future agendas . There was no second, although there was general
consensus that paint colors should be first.
• September 1, 1993, 7
Philip and Donna Yates submitted an application for a Certificate
of Appropriateness for paint colors for their home at 2-4 Gifford
Court. The body is to be Chesapeake Cabot solid stain. The trim
is to be Oyster Grey, Dutch Boy Exterior Paint and the doors to be
Parapet or black. el
Mr. Carr made a motion to approve the application as submitted with
trim to include corner boards, roof brackets, doorway surrounds,
windows and sash. Mr. Slam seconded the motion. All were in favor
and the motion so carried.
161 Federal Street
In continuation from a previous meeting, the St. James Parish
presented an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to
construct a door overhang over the rear door. The applicant was
not present and a drawing had not been submitted. -
e
Mr. Carr made a motion to approve the application as submitted.
Mr. Slam seconded the motion. There were no votes in favor. All
voted in opposition. The motion and Certificate were denied.
121 Federal Street
• John Paul Lenney and Mary Pax-Lenney submitted an application for
a Certificate of Non-Applicability to repaint window frames and
paint around the front door and to replace and paint rotting boards
on back porch. There are to be no changes in color.
Mr. Slam made a motion to approve the application as submitted.
Mr. Carr seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so
carried.
389 Essex Street
Steven Sass and Ellen Golub presented an application for a
Certificate of Appropriateness for paint colors at 389 Essex Street
and requested a waiver of the public hearing. Paint chips and a
drawing indicated the placement of the colors were presented. The
body is proposed to be PO-78, 924 Base 1/A. The trim is to be PE-
21, Sandpiper 69 . The door, shutters and window woodwork is to be
PH-160, Knoxville Gray HC160 .
Mr. Carr made a motion to waive the public hearing. Mr. Slam
seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so carried.
Mr. Casey made a motion to approve the application as submitted.
Mr. Carr seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so
• carried.
September 1, 1993, 8 '
•
Minutes
o
Mr. Slam made a motion to approve the minutes of July 21, 1993 and
August 18, 1993 . Mr. Carr seconded the motion. All were in favor
and the motion so carried.
Other Business
Ms. Guy read a copy of a letter from the Salem Redevelopment
Authority to Holyoke Mutual Insurance Co. regarding fence removal
and parking construction at 18 Crombie Street.
Ms. Guy was asked to speak to the gas inspector concerning meters
that were placed on the front of 177-179 Federal Street and to
remind the gas inspector that installation of meters in districts
requires Commission approval .
Mr. Bailey stated that he recently spoke with Councillor Nowak who
indicated that he would like to see his ward be placed in an
historic district.
Mr. Casey stated that he had site visits with Warner Cable and
found that installations made at 31 Essex Street and 388 Essex
Street were necessary locations due to vandalism. Mr. Casey stated
that the inappropriate installation at 389 Essex Street has been
removed.
There being no further business, Mr. Slam made a motion to adjourn.
Mr. Carr seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so
carried.
Respectfull submitted,
PJ e A. Gu
erk of t e Commission
. " a
September 15, 1993, Page 1
SALEM HISTORICAL COMMISSION
MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 15, 1993
A regular meeting of the Salem Historical Commission was held on 1
Wednesday, September 15, 1993 at 7 : 30 p.m. at One Salem Green,
Salem, MA. Present were Chairman Oedel, Messrs . Kelleher, Slam,
Casey, Carr and Bailey and Ms . Guy.
Violations/Outstanding Work
Ms . Guy stated that a letter was received from the owner of 3 Eaton
Place, stating that the work is completed. Chairman Oedel 'will
inspect.
Ms . Guy stated that the owner of 14 Broad Street sent a letter
stating that the fence will be installed by next Spring. Mr. Carr
made a motion to accept the letter and extend the deadline for
fence completion until 5/31/94 . Mr. Bailey seconded the motion.
All were in favor and the motion so carried.
Ms . Guy stated that the owner of 92 Federal Street called
approximately 9/10/93 and stated that the railings would be
• completed during the upcoming weekend. Ms. Guy stated that the
property will need inspection.
Ms. Guy stated that the Plumbing Inspector has arranged for Boston
Gas to remove the meters at 0 N. Pine Street and correct any
problems with 177-179 Federal Street. Ms . Guy stated that 0 N.
Pine Street will need inspection.
Mr. Carr stated that there is no violation at 192 Federal Street.
12 Lynn Street
Jeffrey Beale and Joan Troy Beale presented an Application for a
Certificate of Appropriateness for paint colors at their home at 12
Lynn Street. The body will be Narragansett Green and the doors
will be Cotswold Rose.
Mr. Beale stated that he is considering eliminating the white trim
and painting the trim the body color in order to have the building
look less tall . Mr. Carr felt that either would be appropriate.
Mr. Carr asked if they were concerned how their proposed color
would be effected by the green colors of 17 1/2 River and 8 Lynn
Streets . Mr. Beale felt that his body color was so dark that it
would not have an effect. Mr. Beale stated that he checked color
swatches against the houses around his home.
Mr. Slam was concerned about the darkness of the color. Chairman
• September 15, 1993, Page 2
Oedel stated that the issue is of appropriateness and that the
color is appropriate.
There was no public comment.
Mr. Carr made a motion to approve the application as submitted with
the option to paint the trim either the body color or white. Mr.
Casey seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion was so
carried.
Mr. Carr stated that he had trust in the Beale's to make the right
decision on color and noted that they had unerring good taste.
136 Federal Street
In continuation from a previous meeting, Greater Lynn Special Needs .
Housing Corp. presented an application for a Certificate of,
Hardship for the construction of a porch with a handicapped ramp at
136 Federal Street.
Sam Vitale, Attorney for Greater Lynn Special Needs Housing Corp.
presented a package of information and stated that it included a
letter with supporting documents relating to inspections by the
Department of Mental Health and Department of Public Health, a
summary of regulations relating to zoning and access, and copies of
letters which responded to the correspondence the Home had received
from the Suttons, which had been submitted at the last meeting.
Atty. Vitale stated that representatives from the home met with Mr.
Bleu, and decided to have their architect design a fence. Atty.
Vitale stated that the fence design will be ready for the next
meeting.
Mr. Carr questioned if the 60-day deadline would be an issue.
Atty. Vitale stated that the Greater Lynn Special Needs Housing
Corp. would waive the 60 day deadline. Mr. James Chalmers signed
a waiver request on behalf of the Greater Lynn Special Needs
Housing Corp.
Mr. Carr made a motion to continue the application.
Ms . Guy stated that she received a telephone call and letter from
Councillor Harvey who had a conflict which did not allow him to
attend tonight' s meeting. The letter requests that the Greater
Lynn Special Needs Housing Corp. work in cooperation with the
neighborhood to address the number of problems that exist with the
appearance of the property and that any changes that are to be made
to the existing structure be consistent with the historic fabric of
the area.
• Mr. Carr stated that screening liberates the need to review a non-
conforming element to a 19th century house.
• September 15, 1993, Page 3
Paul Tempesta stated that there have been obstacles to making
improvements while renting the property, such as amortization over sa '
20 years . Mr. Tempesta stated that they have only owned the
property since May 15, 1993 and that plans for major improvements
were issued within 90 days of ownership.
Mr. Kelleher noted that Massachusetts Historical Commission has an
ADA specialist, Bill Smith, and presented the Commission with an
application used to begin the review process required by MHC for
projects using State or Federal funds .
Marilyn Sutton, 6 Carpenter Street, stated that the Home's excuse
of previous owner Cliff Hughes not allocating money for
improvements was a mechanism of run-around. Ms. Sutton stated that
there are privacy concerns for the individuals on Carpenter Street
and those living in the Home. Ms. Sutton voiced a hope of
cooperation and things being done to create privacy in the densely,:
packed location. Ms . Sutton stated that the noise level is
distressing and that there has been little consideration for the
neighborhood.
Mr. Tempesta stated that they do not want an adversarial situation
with the neighbors and noted that the Home has agreed to a fence.
• Mr. Casey seconded Mr. Carr's motion. All were in favor and the
motion so carried.
348 Essex Street
Sam Allen presented an Application for a Certificate of
Appropriateness to remove an aluminum downspout and gutter on the
Beckford Street side of 348 Essex Street. An application for a
Certificate of Non-Applicability to paint the outside of the house
where necessary and repair one piece of rotted wood on the fence
was also submitted.
Mr. Allen stated that the gutter was removed because it did not
work and since it was the only gutter, he did not want to put
another back up.
Mr. Casey stated that he visited the site and questioned if Mr.
Allen was satisfied with the facia board repair. Mr. Casey stated
that it has gaps and holes and the boards are separated. Mr. Allen
stated that he wants to fix the holes and that he will fix the
gaps . Mr. Casey stated that the facia is in pieces and that the
facia board on the front should be one solid board. Chairman Oedel
stated that when looking up at it, one should not be able to see
the repair.
• Mr. Slam asked if it was intended to leave gutters off permanently.
• September 15, 1993, Page 4 t
Mr. Allen stated that the building needs molding someday, but that ,w
he would have a problem putting up aluminum gutters . ;'.
Mr. Carr suggested a time frame be established for facia repairs
and molding replacement.
Mr. Allen stated that he could fix the front facia within the next
week. Mr. Allen stated he could come back with a crown molding, 41�*'
application. -
Mr. Slam stated that the Commission cannot require the crown
molding. Mr. Bailey was in agreement.
Mr. Carr stated that he recalled their being gutters on the. Essex
Street side. Mr. Casey stated that he recalled that they were
wooden. Mr. Allen stated that they have not been there since his
ownership in the last ten years and that he resides at the address .
Mr. Carr made a motion to approve a Certificate of Appropriateness
for the removal of the aluminum downspout and gutter on Beckford
Street side of the building, and to repair the surface underneath.
The motion is also to permit the installation of crown molding with
design elements being delegated to Messrs. Carr and Bailey and
• there be no timeframe requirement for the installation of crown
molding. Mr. Kelleher seconded the motion. All were in favor and
the motion so carried.
Mr. Allen stated that the painting is for trim only.
Mr. Carr made a motion to approve a Certificate of Non-
Applicability to repaint the trim in existing color with painting
to be completed within 1 year and for the replacement of rotted
wood on fence to replicate the existing. The motion is also to
patch the hole underneath the front, right side of the facia and
repair/replace facia boards so as to eliminate gaps (one solid
board) with work to be completed within 30 days . Mr. Slam seconded
the motion. All were in favor and the motion so carried.
91 Federal Street
Mary Gannett of the Gannet Corp. , on behalf of the Arlanders,
presented an application for a Certificate of Non-applicability to
replace existing copper gutters in kind.
Mr. Carr made a motion to approve the application as submitted.
Mr. Slam seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so
carried.
• 188 Derby Street
Eric Mysliwy was present to discuss the status of work at 188 Derby
• September 15, 1993, Page 5
Street. -
-. sa r
Mr. Mysliwy stated that he would like an extension on installation
of pillars for 1 year and submitted two sketches for proposed ' '
pillars . �.
Mr. Carr asked if the sketch showed a rectangular base supporting A
a round column. Mr. Mysliwy replied in the affirmative.
Mr. Oedel noted that the original pillars were round and not
square.
Y
Mr. Casey asked if the columns will match the pilasters in the
back. Mr. Mysliwy stated that they would rather not do so.
Mr. Carr questioned the height of the base and suggested that the
owners look at other McIntyre houses of the same period and speak
to Dean Lahikianan of the Essex Institute.
Mr. Slam asked why a one year extension is needed. Mr. Mysliwy
replied that it is needed for financial reasons.
Mr. Slam asked if the column will be custom milled or stock. Mr.
• Mysliwy stated that the base top and bottom will be custom and that
the column will be stock.
Mr. Carr made a motion to delegate Messrs . Carr and Casey to help R
develop an optimum design and for the applicant to file an
application within 60 days. Mr. Slam seconded the motion. All
were in favor and the motion so carried.
Other Business
i
Mr. Carr made a motion to approve the minutes of September 1, 1993 .
Mr. Bailey seconded the motion, all were in favor and the motion so
carried.
Ms. Guy stated that a letter was received from Massachusetts
Historical Commission (MHC) who stated that Naumkeag Steam Cotton
Mills nomination to the National Register has been withdrawn.
Ms . Guy stated that a letter was received from MHC concerning the
proposal to expand the Salem Common National Register District.
Ms . Guy stated that it appears that MHC suggests that additional
properties on Essex Street should be included and that the North
River neighborhood should be prepared as a separate nomination.
MHC still requires justification of boundaries and Ms. Guy noted
that she_ does not have the expertise to provide the needed
• information. Ms . Guy will provide Chairman Oedel with all the
relative documents .
. AJ
4k
°rF
w J
• September 15, 1993, Page .
Ms . Guy read a Council Order that New England Telephone Co. install
a pay telephone on the Common and that approval be requested from }ter
the SRA and or Salem Historical Commission. Chairman Oedel
suggested a letter be sent to New England Telephone noting that a
standard telephone booth is unlikely to get approval and that the a
Commission has jurisdiction over location.
Ms. Guy stated that a letter was received from MHC which indicated
that MHC has concurred with the National Park Service that the
wharf design proposal for the Salem Maritime National Historic Site
has no adverse effect.
Ms . Guy stated that a Memorandum of Agreement was signed for
replacement of the Congress Street Bridge indicating that the
bridge must be recorded to HAER standards .
Ms . Guy stated that a Certificate of Non-Applicability was issued
for 9 North Street to replace the upper part of entrance trim above
the front door, install a new copper roof and install new lead
flashing.
Ms . Guy stated that after organizing the work completed by the
summer intern for the Washington Square District expansion, there
• are still 25 B forms to be completed and 13 properties to be
photographed. Ms . Guy stated that she will complete the
photography and assigned each Commission member 2-5 properties to
complete B forms . Ms. Guy provided a map indicating the properties
in Ward 1 that have been surveyed. Ms . Guy suggested that
Councillor Nowak be invited to an upcoming meeting to determine
proposed boundaries for expansion into the ward. Ms . Guy also
stated that a poll could be included in the next newsletter and
mailed to everyone within the draft boundaries in order to
determine who supports, does not support or needs more information
on expansion.
Term Limits
Chairman Oedel stated that he recommends the Commission self-impose
term limits . Chairman Oedel noted that four members have been on
the Commission a long time and that a mandatory 1 year sabbatical
would be important to the vitality of each person as well as would
add fresh blood to the Commission. Chairman Oedel stated that
there would always be an opening since someone would always be
rotating off. Chairman Oedel stated that the Commission needs to
keep up the vitality and expertise and to get new blood. Chairman
Oedel stated that the Commission needs a woman member, but most do
not want to get on due the Commission' s reputation.
Mr. Carr stated that he was opposed to term limits and stated that
•' a person is not necessarily burnt out if on the Commission over 6
years . Mr. Carr noted that he has the best attendance and is the
• 4
N!FF
• September 15, 1993, Page 7
{
most active. Mr. Carr stated that term limits won't guarantee an
active body. Mr. Carr stated that there is an existing State 47 .
Statute which requires appointment or reappointment every 2-3 years , '
with confirmation by the City Council . Mr. Carr stated that if
there is a problem with stagnant people, there is another i
mechanism. Mr. Carr stated that he spoke with Mayor Harrington who
stated that he is governed by the Statute and that the Chairman
should talk to those who are not measuring up. Mr. Carr felt ,that
the term limits proposed were arbitrary and that the Commission may
loose people with unique expertise. Mr. Carr felt that the :term
limits are being proposed as a means of removing those who are not
pulling their weight, and suggested the Chairman have lunch with
those not performing. Mr. Carr felt that if a vote is taken, it
should be taken with the full compliment of members and that a more
than unanimous vote be required.
Mr. Bailey stated that it would be devastating to loose talent if
done all at one time. Mr. Bailey stated that the Commission does ="
need new blood but that current members might not get back on if
taken off.
Mr. Casey stated that he would like to see the current opening
filled and noted that an architect is needed. Mr. Casey asked if }
any members had come forward to say they are willing to leave at j
the end of their terms. Chairman Oedel replied in the affirmative.
Mr. Casey stated that he did not know anyone with the knowledge of
Salem that Mr. Carr has and noted that Mr. Carr is important to the
Commission. Mr. Casey stated that an attorney is needed and noted
that it takes a new member about a year to get up to speed on the
Commission.
Mr. Slam stated that what Chairman Oedel is trying to do has alot
of merit. Mr. Slam stated that attendance, diligence, decorum at
meetings, how to deal with applicants, and judgement are all as
important or more important. Mr. Slam noted that the remaining
five positions have rotated. Mr. Slam stated that he would like a
mechanism to deal with attendance, decorum at meetings and dealing
with applicants . Mr. Slam stated that the Chairman should go to
members to work out problems and if not worked out, the member
should be asked to resign. Mr. Slam stated that if this method did
not work, he would then be in favor of term limits.
Mr. Kelleher stated that the only benefit would be the improvement
of the public image and that the loss of expertise would be greater
than the gain in public relations. Mr. Kelleher stated that it is
important to get an architect and a female. Mr. Kelleher stated
that the impression of an all male board is not positive.
• Mr. Carr presented letters from Roger Hedstrom and Walter Cook in
opposition to term limits .
' F}
September 15, 1993, Page 8
r -
Ms . Guy noted that if there is a new administration, an existing 1'r.
member may not be placed back on after the one year absence.,. :.
=a
Mr. Slam stated that the City could at some point get an
administration that is not pro-preservation.
Chairman Oedel stated that his previous experience with boards that
have been the most effective (city, volunteer, church) were those
with term limits . Chairman Oedel felt that the expertise should be
rotated and passed on.
Mr. Bailey felt that the Chairman's position should rotate. Mr.
Bailey stated that the Commission has an image problem and the
Chairman should work to improve it. Mr. Bailey felt that a mix of
people helps the image.
Mr. Slam stated that a serious issue is that members should talk
only when recognized by the Chair. Mr. Slam stated that negative_;.: - -
public relations effect the Commission' s effectiveness to deal with
applicants which in turn causes violations or the lack of property
maintenance.
There being no further business, Mr. Casey made a motion to
adjourn. Mr. Carr seconded the motion, all were in favor and the
motion so carried.
Respectively submitted,
J ne A. Guy
C erk of the Commission
I • t. '
Yw'ti.
October 6, 1993„" Page 1
• q
THE SALEM HISTORICAL COMMISSION "tom
MINUTES
OCTOBER 6, 1993
i
A regular meeting of the Salem Historical Commission was held on-
i
Wednesday, October 6, 1993 at 7 : 30 p.m. at One Salem Green. .
Present were Chairman Oedel, Messrs. Slam, Cook and Carr and Ms .
Guy. n
"i
Chairman Oedel announced that since only a minimum quorum was 4
present, a unanimous vote would be needed to pass on` any
application.
136 Federal Street
In continuation from a previous meeting, Greater Lynn Special Needs
Housing Corp. presented an application for a Certificate of
Hardship for the construction of a porch with a handicapped ramp at
136 Federal Street.
Mr. Sal Bonura presented revised drawings that included the
addition of a fence and revisions to the windows . Mr. Bonura
stated that on the side of the rear ell, they will restore one
• window, move one window over one foot and add shutters . On the
rear, they will relocated the door and clean up one window. Mr.
Bonura stated that the style of the fence duplicates the fence at
134 Federal Street. The fence will run from the rear corner of the
house, return toward the side lot line and run along the property
to the rear end of the yard. They intend to replant the large
trees in front of the fence at the streetscape. Mr. Bonura stated
that the size of the deck has been cut back and that they have
added a planting area in between the fence and deck. Mr. Bonura
stated that the fence will be 6ft high and the deck is 31" off the
ground. The steps to the deck have been moved to the other side of
the house.
Chairman Oedel opened the public hearing.
Marilyn Sutton, 6 Carpenter Street, asked the dimensions of the
deck. Mr. Bonura replied that the deck was reduced by 61 . Ms.
Sutton asked the distance from the Assembly House property. Mr.
Bonura replied that it was approximately 91 .
Mr. Slam stated that he liked the fence design but stated that they
may need more detail . Mr. Slam stated that he liked the height and
that his only problem was that it does not go along the rear
property line. Mr. Bonura stated that there is heavy landscaping
along the rear line which a person cannot walk through.
• Mr. Carr stated that it was a big improvement and that he had no
problem with the door, windows, fence detail or access to driveway.
• October 6, 1993, Page 2t `
Mr. Bonura stated that there is no change to the curb cuts .
Mr. Carr stated that he preferred the fence to come to the sidewalk
and that the trees should be inside the fence. Mr. Bonura stated
that he had no problem changing the proposal .
Mr. Bonura noted that the deck is disguised by a 6 ' fence, trees
and the setback of the deck. ,
Mr. Cook agreed that the fence should be to the sidewalk and felt
that the Commission may want to specify the tree size. Mr. Cook
stated that the fence was tastefully designed.
Chairman Oedel was in agreement that the fence should go to the
sidewalk. Chairman Oedel stated that the applicants have done what
the Commission asked and that it improves the streetscape and the
rear.
Peter Sutton, 6 Carpenter Street, agreed that the design of the
fence is an improvement but was concerned that the height was not
sufficient. Mr. Sutton felt the fence should be 8 ' and should also
run along the Assembly House property line for privacy during their
functions.
• Ms. Sutton asked if the fence is picket or solid. Mr. Slam stated
that it was solid. Chairman Oedel stated that it had a rail and
cap.
Ms . Sutton asked how high are the trees . Mr. Bonura provided
pictures of the existing trees. Ms. Sutton stated that her concern
is to contain the noise.
Mr. Sutton stated that the increase of the porch and the decrease
of the yard will result in more activity on the porch which will
bring up the level of noise. Mr. Bonura stated that the deck is
designed with the minimum access of space as required by the State.
Carol Dearborn, 12 Carpenter Street, stated that her greatest
difficulty is with the noise factor and that the greatest level is
on the ground level . Ms. Dearborn felt that the deck should be
lowered or the fence raised and that the landscaping should be
sufficient.
Chairman Oedel closed the public hearing.
Mr. Slam stated that he appreciated the concerns, but noted that
the Commission does not have jurisdiction over noise. Mr. Slam
believed that 6 ' was the maximum allowed for a fence by the
Building Code. Mr. Slam stated that the Commission does not have
jurisdiction over landscaping. Mr. Oedel noted that the Commission
can add landscaping as part of a Certificate.
• October 6, 1993, Page 311'
Mr. Carr stated that landscaping can be made a conditional part of
the plan. Mr. Carr asked if there are posts at the gate. Mr. `
Bonura stated that there is a post at each side of the gate.
Mr. Bonura noted that the plants are 10-16 ' evergreens .
Mr. Carr made a motion to find that landscaping is an intregal part
of the design solution and to approve the revised drawings as
submitted with the following changes : The four relocated plants in
front of the deck be of a minimum height of 10 ' . Should the .plants,
die during transplanting, they are to be replaced in kind. The
fence to run along the sidewalk, with the four trees to be placed
inside of the fence. Shutters to match existing, wood, hung so as
to appear operable and to shed water when closed. Mr. Cook
seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so carried.
Mr. Paul Tempesta requested to address the neighbors and stated
that his agency purchased the building on 5/15/93 . Mr. Tempesta'
noted that the pVk�rious problems were due to their hands being tied
from not owning the property. Mr. Tempesta stated that within 60
days of ownership, they introduced plans to improve the property.
Mr. Tempesta stated that if the neighbors should have any problems
in the future to contact him or the program director.
• 10 Hamilton Street
B.Paul and E. Alexander submitted an application for a Certificate
of Appropriateness for a side fence in violation to be altered.
The new fence will be approximately 4 ' high. The tall fence is to
be cut 'and lattice work to serve as fill . The lattice is to be
painted green or white, with a white crossbar. A photograph was
provided.
The consensus of the Commission was that the proposed fence was
inappropriate.
Mr. Carr made a motion to approve the application in hopes that it
would fail . Mr. Slam seconded the motion. There were no votes in
favor, all were opposed. The motion was denied.
Mr. Cook will contact the owner to assist in developing an
appropriate design.
4 Andover Street
Joel Caron presented an application for a Certificate of
Appropriateness for the fence in front of his house at 4 Andover
Street to be extended along the western boundary. The fence along
the northern boundary to be extended behind the garage 'and along
the west side of the garage. The application notes that extending
a fence means using virtually identical materials, design, colors,
r i
ty
October 6 , 1993, Page 4 _
etc.
Mr. Carr felt the rear fence extension is non-application due to q
not being visible from the public way.
Mr. Carr stated that the front fence may be too high style for the
sides . Mr. Cook and Mr. Slam did not have a problem with extending
the front fence along the sides.
Mr. Carr made a motion to approve the application as submitted.,
Mr. Cook seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so
carried.
7 Hamilton Street
Frederick Keach submitted an application for a certificate of
Appropriateness to repaint the body and trim of his house at 7
Hamilton Street in the same colors .
Mr. Carr made a motion to change the application to Non-
Applicability and approve the application as submitted. Mr. Slam
seconded the motion, all were in favor and the motion so carried.
• Discussion with potential Commission members
Susan Marsh stated that she lives on Carlton Street and has lived
in the Boston area for 10 years - 7 in Salem. Ms. Marsh was
originally from Florida and is an architect doing a lot of public
and commercial work. Ms. Marsh stated that uses of buildings and
technology is changing and it is a challenge on how to make old
buildings meet new uses .
Helen Sides stated that she lives at 35 Broad Street for the past
couple years and has worked in Boston and Portland Maine. Ms.
Sides is an architect doing mostly residential work out of a
Hamilton office. Ms . Sides stated that preservation provides her
with both reservations and challenges and that she does not want to
stop time, but wants to preserve the past and the future. Ms .
Sides stated that there is a struggle with the need to maintain
established guidelines and still have flexibility.
Violations
Ms . Guy stated that she has not heard from the City Solicitor
concerning two properties the Commission requested enforcement for.
Ms . Guy stated that she received a call from a neighbor to 17
Fowler Street saying that they were adding vinyl windows . Ms . Guy
sent the Asst. Building Inspector to the site who determined that
only two wood windows were being replaced in kind.
October 6, 1993, Page 5
R
Ms . Guy stated that there are several properties on the list
needing Commission member's inspection.
Mr. Carr asked that a second letter be sent to 86 Federal Street.
Other Business
Ms . Guy stated that Certificates of Non-Applicability were issued
for 385 Essex Street for the removal of a window and installation
of a bulkhead and 335 Essex Street for chimney, skylight, roof;.,
fence posts, and deck repairs and repainting.
The Commission received a request to support a grant application to
the National Endowment for the Arts for a sculpture at Lafayette
Park. Mr. Carr motioned to send a letter of support. Mr. Slam
seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so carried.
Ms . Guy stated that a letter from Massachusetts Historical
Commission (MHC) to MEPA was received concerning the Stop and Shop
Plaza at Howley Street and its Section 106 Review. Ms. Guy stated
that the Salem Historical Commission has not received any plans and
that there are properties slated for demolition.
• The Commission received a letter from MHC to HUD concerning 184
Lafayette Street which requests more information on proposed work
under Section 106 Review.
Mr. Carr asked if the Commission could get an update on Salem' s
bike paths . Chairman Oedel suggested Peabody be invited to talk
about the proposed path which ends at the Salem line. Ms . Guy will
ask the City Planner if an update could be provided at the next
meeting.
Chairman Oedel noted that there is a Preservation/Restoration
conference on December 6-8 and that members should make every
effort to attend.
There being no further business, Mr. Slam made a motion to adjourn.
Mr. Carr seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so
carried.
Respectfully alibmitted,
J A. Guy
C rk of the ommission
1� Y
October 20, 1993, Page 1
ykA}
Y
SALEM HISTORICAL COMMISSION v It Z4
MINUTES t.
OCTOBER 20, 1993
A regular meeting of the Salem Historical Commission was held on
Wednesday, October 20, 1993, 7 : 30 p.m. at One Salem Green, Salem,
MA. Present were Chairman Oedel, Messrs . Hedstrom, Casey, Slam,
Cook, Bailey and Ms . Guy. Messrs . Carr and Kelleher entered later ,
in the meeting.
Ms . Guy noted that there will be no November 3, 1993 unless any `
items on tonight' s agenda are continued until then.
32 Broad Street
r
Eric Glass presented an application for a Certificate , of
Appropriateness to change three existing windows to smaller windows
at 32 Broad Street. The application also proposes to change one of
the existing back doors to one with more glass . Before and after
drawings and photographs were included with the application. Also `
presented was an application for a Certificate of Non-Applicability
to repaint the exterior with the same colors and repair damaged
wood, including clapboards, moldings, etc. , as necessary. The work
is to be done over the next year.
• Mr. Glass stated that he would like to change the 9 light door to
a 15 light door. Mr. Glass noted that on the three windows, he may
have to changed from 2 over 1 to 2 over 2 .
Mr. Carr joined the meeting at this time.
Mr. Bailey asked if the tops of the windows will be at the same
level . Mr. Glass replied in the affirmative.
Mr. Slam made a motion to approve the application as submitted.
Mr. Hedstrom seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion
so carried. Mr. Carr abstained from voting.
Mr. Kelleher joined the meeting at this time.
Mr. Casey made a motion to approve the Non-Applicability
application as submitted. Mr. Slam seconded the motion, all were
in favor and the motion so carried. Mr. Bailey abstained.
Mr. Bailey left the meeting at this time.
24 Winter Street
Jeffrey Laaff submitted an application for a Certificate of Non-
Applicability to repair existing trim, shutter and moldings and to
• repaint his own at 24 Winter Street in the same color.
Mr. Carr made a motion to approve the application as submitted.
Mr. Cook seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so
October 20, 1993, Page 2
'e ..
o,.4
carried.
17 Fowler Street
Albert & Ruth LeDuc submitted an application for a Certificate of,
Non-Applicability to replace two first floor windows with two
identical wood windows . '
Ms. Guy noted that the work was already completed and that she had
been notified by a neighbor when the work was underway. Mr. x
Jennings of the Building Department went to the site and affirmed
that there were only two windows being replaced and they were of M1
wood. Mr. Carr noted that he spoke to the owner and confirmed what
work was being done..
Mr. Carr made a motion to approve the application as submitted.
Mr. Hedstrom seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion
so carried.
Mr. Hedstrom requested that a letter be sent with the Certificate
reminding the owners that all future work must be applied for
before work commences . 4*;_
191 Washington Sq. N.
• Mr. Carr introduced the following application and presented
photographs for the Commission's consideration to add to the
agenda. Mr. Carr stated that he has been to the site.
B.P.M. Productions requested a waiver of the public hearing and
submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to
reclapboard the entire building at 191 Washington Sq. N. , repair
gutters with new facia board and freeze board, replace corner
boards with new, and remove several windows . The windows on the
"right side" are to be replaced with new moldings and closed
shutters, to give the appearance of windows . Drawings were
presented.
Mr. Bruce Michaud, representing B.P.M. Productions, stated that the
facia and portions of the lower facade in the rear addition are
rotted.
Mr. Casey asked the date of the building. Mr. Michaud stated that
the church was built in 1845 and that the rear addition was
probably built in the early 1900 ' s.
Mr. Cook asked if Kimball Court was a public way. Mr. Michaud
stated that it was privately owned with some abutters having
easements . Mr. Carr stated that the City Clerk deems it to be a
public way although it is an unaccepted street. Mr. Carr stated
that the City Clerk noted that approximately 68% of Salem' s streets
are unaccepted.
Mr. Michaud stated that for security, they want to remove the
Y + 3
F K'.
October 20, 1993, Page 3
Iwindows, but in order to keep the fenestration would put in' molding `
and closed shutters. He proposes to purchase the largest t.k e.
production shutters since the windows are over 7 ' and to instafi'la.l
mock window sill . Mr. Michaud indicated that the museum was broken4
into last year. Mr. Carr suggested that 2 sets of smaller shutters.:
per window be considered. r� '
Mr. Michaud stated that they would also like to bring up tti'droof.
i
line of the first floor rear addition. }},
Mr. Carr made a motion to put the request to waive the public
hearing on the agenda. Mr. Casey seconded the motion, all were 'in
favor and the motion so carried. '
Mr. Michaud stated that he proposes to install a larger freezeboardNi,
than what is there.
Mr. Casey asked if the windows will be in the same location. � Mr`.
Michaud replied in the affirmative but stated they may be a -
differe t size. r'
Mr. Michaud stated that the windows in the rear will be removed and
clapboarded over. Mr. Carr felt that the rear is non-visible.
• Mr. Kelleher was concerned that blocking an entire wall will create
a huge mass . Mr. Michaud stated that it is blocked by trees .
Mr. Kelleher felt that the four windows that are to be appear as ,
real windows with closed shutters should be kept the same size as
the existing working windows . Mr. Kelleher stated that he would
have no problem removing the bottom two windows in order to keep
the top two in the same size.
Mr. Hedstrom stated that the shutters should be in proportion to
the windows and be milled to size if necessary. Mr. Hedstrom
agreed that the window size should remain.
Mr. Carr did not feel the rear was in the Commission' s
jurisdiction. Mr. Carr did not want to downscale the window size.
Mr. Cook stated that he would like to see a footprint and felt that
he was not prepared to act on the application.
Mr. Casey stated that he was concerned with loosing too much of the
original fabric . Mr. Casey was concerned with loosing the size of
the windows since they would likely be loosing the original
clapboards and other elements .
Chairman Oedel stated that he would rather have the original
• windows and sash be retained, but filled with plywood with shutter
closed over. Mr. Michaud stated that the windows are too
deteriorated and would have to be rebuilt. Mr. Michaud stated that
the clapboards are rotted around the windows and that they need to
get the building weather tight.
October 20, 1993, Page 4
• � ?t
Mr. Carr made a motion to find that an emergency water.+'and. rot
situation exists and to waive the public hearing. The motion is ,
also to approve the application as submitted subject to the window
opening dimensions, molding and sills of the false windows to
replicate the existing in the same location. The shutters are to
be in appropriate scale and be applied over the false windows in a
closed position so as to shed water. Corner boards are , to be '
replicated and the roof over the first floor ell to be rubber. Mr.
Carr stated that the approval is subject to there being no requests
to hold the public hearing within 10 days as per the- legal
requirements.
t.
Mr. Michaud stated that he would also like to remove one window: rr
Mr. Hedstrom stated that there should be better photographs. andf' <
drawings . ,
Mr. Carr felt the Commission could delegate any unspecified areas'.
Chairman Oedel stated that waiving the public hearing is primarily
done when the work involved is insignificant. Chairman Oedel
stated that moving elements on the facade is not insignificant and
did not feel the public hearing should be waived.
• Mr. Michaud stated that the window is not visible from the public
way.
Mr. Slam stated that he has a financial relationship with the
applicant and abstained from the discussion.
IMr. Casey seconded Mr. Carr' s motion.
Mr. Kelleher did not have a problem with any other aspect of the
work.
Mr. Hedstrom did not have a problem with the work proposed but did
not know the sizes of the facia board, watertable and trim. Mr.
Hedstrom stated that the drawing did not show locations or sizes.
Mr. Michaud stated that the watertable would be 12" pine with a
lip. Mr. Hedstrom stated that he did not mistrust Mr. Michaud' s
judgement, but stated that he had a problem with the drawings
submitted.
Mr. Cook stated that he was not ready to approve the work as yet,
which was with no reflection on Mr. Michaud's motives or taste.
Mr. Casey stated that it was an unusual request to make a decision
without the adequate information and approval would be like
shooting in the dark.
• Chairman Oedel agreed that there was insufficient information.
Chairman Oedel stated that although not easy to get to, it was
visible from Kimball Court. Chairman Oedel stated that there is
neighbor impact. Chairman Oedel stated that he would be willing to
October 20, 1993, Page 5 ,
• e }. .
issue a Certificate for the rubber roof only.
Mr. Michaud stated that he put the awnings on hold after looking at"
a mock-up. Mr. Michaud stated that they may want to complete the
work proposed by doing one side each year.
Mr. Carr suggested that measurements and photographs of the windows
be taken. Mr. Carr suggested delegation of the molding, facia,
soffits and watertable.
Mr. Carr amended his motion to delegate Mr. Hedstrom to approve
molding, facia, soffits and watertable details .
Mr. Cook stated that he would like a site visit and was opposed to
delegating at this time.
Mr. Michaud withdrew his request to waive the public hearing, and
submitted his application for the regular public hearing proces§ . }
Mr. Carr withdrew his motion. Mr. Casey withdrew his second. ?
f:
A site visit was scheduled for November 6 at 9 :00 a.m. 1
41 Chestnut St.
• Richard Jagolta and Kersten Lanes requested a waiver of the public
hearing and submitted an application for a Certificate of
Appropriateness to install a 2" drain vent and a 4" dryer vent
through the roof of the back ell on the facade facing Flint Street.
Vents to be installed as low as possible in height and towards
peak.
Mr. Hedstrom stated that the vent may be visible from Flint Street
minimally.
Mr. Casey did not feel it would be visible due to the ballastraded
roof at 43 Chestnut Street.
Mr. Carr made a motion to change the application to an application
for a Certificate of Non-Applicability due to being essentially
non-visible from the public way and to approve the application.
Mr. Cook seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so
carried. Mr. Hedstrom abstained from voting.
Violations/Work Status
Ms . Guy stated that she received a complaint from a neighbor of 135
Derby Street concerning signage and other promotional materials
attached to the building. Ms . Guy will send a letter.
• Chairman Oedel stated that 3 Eaton Place is Okay to be removed from
the violation list. Chairman Oedel stated that there is no change
in status of 1-3 No. Pine St.
Mr. Carr stated that 271 Lafayette Street has altered a handrail.
October 20, 1993,' Page •.6
k ..
• Ms. Guy stated that the Clerk' s Certificate of Violatio_ni,for the
ballasters was not filed since Atty. Ledoux suggested' •that the .
applicant be afforded an opportunity to comment prior to any'
filing. Mr. Carr made a motion to notify the homeowner that the
item will be placed on the November 17, 1993 agenda. Mr. Casey
seconded the motion, all were in favor and the motion so carried. I
Mr. Carr asked if any other violations have the same status . Ms .
Guy replied that 265 Lafayette Street is also an egregious.
violation. Mr. Carr made a motion to notify the homeowner that the
item will be placed on the November 17, 1993 agenda. Mr. Casey
seconde the motion, all were in favor and the motion so carried.
Mr. Coo stated that the meters have been removed from 0 N. �Pine_,'A
Street. �»�
Mr. Casey stated that shutters installed at 389 Essex Street are t 1'
the incorrect size, are hung upside-down and are hung improperly by i `
being drilled to the building. Ms . Guy will send a letter.
Mr. Casey stated that there is no change in 92 Federal Street. Ms .
Guy will send a letter.
� t
Other Business
• Mr. Hedstrom made a motion to approve the minutes of September 15,
1993. Mr. Carr seconded the motion, all were in favor and the
motion so carried.
Discussion with potential Commission member
Pamela Jane Bryer stated that she has been an architect for 12
years and works at Jung Brannen. Ms . Bryer is from Oregon and now
lives on Mt. Vernon Street. Ms . Bryer stated that she has not done
much preservation work and does mostly commercial work. Mr. Bryer
has a personal interest in the area and a desire to be active in
the community.
There being no further business, Mr. Slam made a motion to adjourn.
Mr. Cook seconded the motion, all were in favor and the motion so
carried.
Respectfully submitted,
iAerk
. Guy
• of th Commission
• November 17, , l 993, 1
SALEM HISTORICAL COMMISSION
MINUTES
NOVEMBER 17, 1993
A regular meeting of the Salem Historical Commission was held on
Wednesday, November 17 , 1993 at 7 :30 p.m. at One Salem Green,
Salem, MA. Present were Chairman Oedel, Messrs . Kelleher, Cook, -
Bailey, Carr, Slam and Casey and Ms . Guy.
Walking Trails
William Luster, City Planner, was present to update the Commission
on the status of proposed walking trails . Mr. Luster stated that
the City is working with Historic Salem, Inc . and the North River
Historic Neighborhood Association to develop 3 trails . Mr. Luster
stated that the City is negotiating with property owners foreland
purchases and right of ways and is seeking funding for such , -
purchases and construction by applying for ISTEA funding. Mr'
Luster stated that the City is also negotiating with the State for 4
the Bridge Street By-pass Project to include the construction of a
portion of one of the proposed trails . Mr. Luster indicated that
the Planning Board will also be negotiating with Stop & Shop for
their project to include a portion of one of the walking trails .
• Mr. Luster stated that the City already negotiated with the SESD, to
get a portion of the walking trail on Webb Street.
Mr. Cook asked if it would be necessary to alter the existing
Collins Cove walkway. Mr. Luster replied "not necessarily" .
Mr. Carr asked if the trail to Peabody would preclude a connector
road to Route 126 . Mr. Luster stated that the City is keeping the
connector road in mind with this project as well as the Stop & Shop
project.
19 1/2 Washington Sq. N.
Mr. Slam abstained from discussion relating to this property and
excused himself from the table.
Bruce Michaud of BPM Productions, Inc. presented an application for
a Certificate of Appropriateness for various alterations to 19 1/2
Washington Square North including reclapboarding, repair of
gutters, alteration of facia board and freezeboard, replacement of
corner boards, removal of windows, raising of rear ell roof line,
soffit replacement, molding replacement, etc.
Mr. Michaud provided amended drawings and stated that they propose
to add one window to the second floor and remove one window,
. install two new wood doors, replace remaining second floor windows
and remove first floor windows to the rear addition. Mr. Michaud
stated that the main door to the office would be more ornate and
T ..
K
November 17, 1593, 2
•
that he preferred the door have columns . Mr. Michaud stated that
the window openings and sills will stay the same.
Chairman Oedel felt that it would be more appropriate not to have•' ,
columns at the office entrance. Mr. Casey was in agreement.
Mr. Michaud stated that the door will be moved over, that the wires
and conduit will be removed, and that they will add a curb-step and
granite slab. Mr. Michaud stated that they will retain the copper
downspouts and gutters if salvageable, but would use cheaper
materials if they are not. Mr. Michaud stated that he has selected
paint colors but did not bring in a paint chip.
Mr. Casey asked the time frame. Mr. Michaud stated that he .would
like to start in January and that he could come back with more
specific details .
Mr. Carr stated that he liked the introduction of an extra second=, '(., .
floor window. Mr. Michaud stated that a window on the second floor ` ++ ,
may be moved over.
Mr. Carr suggested false window(s) on the first floor. Mr. Cook
stated that he did not feel a false window was needed.
• Mr. Kelleher stated that he preferred to keep the door simple ,
without columns and that false windows are not needed. Mr.
Kelleher liked the proposal for six panel doors .
Mr. Carr made a motion to approve the amended drawings and
application as submitted providing that the window size and
details, cornerboards and clapboard exposure replicate the
existing. The motion includes that Chairman Oedel and Mr. Bailey
be delegated to approve final details on window placement, doors,
watertable, steps and facia. The applicant will have to reapply
for paint colors and if new gutters and downspouts are needed. Mr.
Cook seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so
carried.
19 North Street
Gary Sackrider, trustee of Mary Stewart Realty Trust, presented an
application for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the
replacement of a sign at 19 North Street. The new sign will be 17
wide by 27" high. A drawing and photograph were provided.
Mr. Sackrider stated that the appearance of the sign will be as per
the photo and that the new sign is approximately 1/3 smaller.
• Mr. Carr made a motion to approve the application as submitted.
Mr. Cook seconded the motion, all were in favor and the motion so
carried.
• November 17' 19.9 3, 3
152 Federal Street
The St. James Church requested a waiver of the public hearing •aAd
submitted an application for a Certificate of Hardship to reopen
the large arched doorway in the rear of the church at 152 Federal
Street. The new opening would have double wood doors with 1 ' x 1 '
vents, painted green to match existing. ,
Mr. Carr made a motion to waive the public hearing. Mr. Cook
seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so carried.
e.�F
Chairman Oedel stated that the application states that the door
would be of match boards . Ms . Guy stated that Rev. Leonard had
stated the doors would be one solid plane.
Mr. Carr made a motion to approve the application as submitted and
to delegate approval of the door detail to Mr. Carr. Mr. Cook`
seconded the motion. ry
Mr. Slam suggested that the application be changed from Hardship to
Appropriateness . Mr. Carr so amended the motion. Mr. Cook f r `
seconded the amendment. .'
• Mr. Carr amended his motion to include Mr. Bailey as a delegate.
Mr. Cook seconded the amendment.
The motion was voted upon. All were in favor and the motion so
carried.
265 Lafayette Street
Madeline Frisch came before the Commission with regard to an
outstanding violation concerning windows at 265 Lafayette Street.
Ms . Guy read the application for a Certificate of Appropriateness
filed on May 20, 1991 and the Denial for such application issued by
the Commission on June 11, 1993 . Ms . Guy also read the Certificate
of Appropriateness issued by the Commission on June 11, 1991 which
defined how a wood shim could be used to install the storm and
screen sash to the four arched windows and that the wooden filler
panel installed without approval must be removed.
Ms . Frisch stated that it was not her signature on the application
and that her contractor must have signed it. Ms . Frisch stated
that her contractor had indicated he would handle the Historic
Commission approvals .
Mr. Carr reminded Ms . Frisch that she had been sent notice of the
• meeting and copies of the denial, certificate and several
enforcement letters .
,r .
r
• November 17; 1993 4 r_
y 3
Chairman Oedel stated that the Commission made a determination and
that the windows must be returned to original condition. Chairman
Oedel suggested the Commission allow Ms . Frisch until August * l, }
1994 to complete the work or else the Commission will file a
Certificate as to Violation with the Registry of Deeds .
Mr. Carr made a motion to find that an egregious violation exists p� -
and that the Commission proceed with providing a 30 day notice and
to record a Clerk' s Certificate of Violation after such time or to _.
allow the homeowner to sign a Clerk' s Certificate as to Outstanding
Work agreeing to return the windows to original condition by August
1, 1994 in order to avoid enforcement through Superior Court prior 4. '
to that deadline. w y
Mr. Casey suggested that the owner come back with a proposal . "
Mr. Cook stated that the violation has been ongoing for two yea ° ;` S
and seconded the motion.
Mr. Slam stated that since it has been two years, it would beW'too ;
liberal to allow a deadline of August 1, 1994 without having a
Certificate on record. Mr. Slam stated that the homeowner had /
sufficient opportunity, which the homeowner disregarded, to resolve +`
• the issue.
Chairman Oedel stated that the motion essentially means that the
work would have to be completed within 30 days or the Clerk' s
Certificate would be recorded.
The motion was voted upon. All were in favor and the motion so
carried.
271 Lafayette Street
Ms . Guy summarized the status of the violation at 271 Lafayette
Street by reading letters from the Commission to the homeowner
dated September 3, 1987 , December 7, 1987 , and July 18, 1889, a
letter from the homeowner to the Commission dated September 1,
1989, and minutes of the Commission's meeting of January 13, 1988 .
Ms . Guy also read a letter from the Commission to the homeowner
providing notice of this violation being scheduled for discussion 1
on tonight' s agenda and of the homeowner' s opportunity to comment. 1
The homeowners, Clifford & Susan Abelson, were not present.
Mr. Carr made a motion to find that an egregious violation exists
and to instruct the Clerk of the Commission to file a Clerk' s
Certificate as to Violation with the Registry of Deeds 30 days
after issuing a notice of such filing to the homeowner. . Mr. Slam
seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so carried.
•
Violations/Outstanding Work
1 � .
• November 17 '1993, 5
n ,
Mr. Slam stated that a front staircase has been altered'-at 310
Lafayette Street. Ms . Guy will send a letter. a - '
Mr. Cook suggested that at 10 Hamilton Street, the posts of the
fence be cut down to 1/2" above the pickets and capped and that a
cap be run over the pickets. Mr. Carr questioned what happened to
the cast iron fence.
Mr. Cook stated that he has convinced the owner of 1 Chestnut '
Street to put liners inside the gutters of three sides . of the
house, but that the wooden gutters on the side facing 5 Chestnut w
Street leak heavily onto the handicap ramp. Mr. Cook stated that - a'
he is having a contractor look into whether or not the gutter is' ,
salvageable. `T*
Mr. Carr stated that 92 Federal Street is not completed. Ms . Guy
will ask the City Solicitor if he sent a letter. /I. ,s 't. .
Ms . Guy stated that the fence at 6 No. Pine Street was added'stp the
violation list by Annie Harris some time ago. Ms . Guy stated that ' -,.4
the City Solicitor received a response letter from the owner 6# '6
No. Pine Street who stated that no work has been done to the fept-
Ms . Guy submitted the building survey form which does not showite 4 'q
• view of the fence. Ms . Guy stated that the fence currently thee:
appears weathered and, although she did not know if the existing '�
3 ''
fence is historically appropriate, she did not have any evidence of '.
work being done in violation. This violation will be removed from
the enforcement list.
C4
Ms . Guy will check if the City Solicitor sent a letter to the `
owners of 1-3 No. Pine Street. ,
Other Business
Ms . Guy stated that City Councillor George Nowak died of an
apparent heart attack at his camp in New Hampshire today. Mr. Carr
made a motion to send a letter of condolence to the family and for
the Commission to have a moment of silence. Mr. Cook seconded the
motion. All were in favor and the motion so carried. The
Commission observed a moment of silence on behalf of Councillor fe
Nowak.
Mr. Casey made a motion to approve the minutes of October 6, 1993
and October 20, 1993 . Mr. Kelleher seconded the motion. All were
in favor and the motion so carried.
Mr. Cook stated that Mr. O'Donnell of Washington Square has not
been very cordial since the Commission took a negative stance on
the proposed demolition of the property abutting the funeral home
that is intended for purchase.
C �
'4
� r
• November x17 , 1993, 6
Ms . Guy stated that the Commission has received a letter from the.
National Park Service (NPS) explaining why the appeal of the
decision by the NPS was denied concerning the determination that e
the Endicott Building no longer contributes to the Downtown Salem $
Historic District.
Ms . Guy stated that a letter from Massachusetts' Historical
Commission (MHC) to Camp Dresser & McKee was received concerning '
the SESD Peabody Landfill .
a
Ms . Guy stated that a copy of a letter to Holy Mutual Insurance Co.
from Historic Salem was received regarding the alteration and
neglect at 18 Crombie Street. '
Ms . Guy stated that the Commission received an Environmental
Notification Form for the Proposed Super Stop & Shop at Howley N:
Street. Ms . Guy stated that historic and archaeological resources,,, •
will be effected by the project and that MHC is awaiting furthei.`• x
information which they will provide to the Commission.
Ms . Guy stated that the groundbreaking for the House of Seven
Gables is on November 19 , 1993 at 9 : 00 a.m.
i
• Chairman Oedel stated that he would like every member of the
Commission to attend the Restoration 93 convention held December 6-
8,
8, 1993 .
There being no further business, Mr. Slam made a motion to adjourn.
Mr. Carr seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so
carried.
Respectfully submitted, t'
JKerkof
uy
Cth Commission
3�
fM yk
December 1, '19,93 "- Page
SALEM HISTORICAL COMMISSION
MINUTES ry
DECEMBER 1, 1993 M `#
A regular meeting of the Salem Historical Commission was held on.,
Wednesday, December 1, 1993 at 7 : 30 p.m. at One Salem Green, Salem;"
MA. Present were Chairman Oedel, Messrs Hedstrom, Carr, Cook and
Slam and Ms . Guy. { '
152 Federal Street
The Commission acted upon this application at the last meeting
under a Waiver of Public Hearing. t �'
Salem Common
New England Telephone presented an application for a Certificate of T'J"!
Appropriateness as directed by a Salem City Council Order tot
install a public telephone at the Salem Common. The proposed-
location would be near Telephone. Pole #1485 which is located
opposite Williams Street.. Ingress and egress to the phone will rr y;f
require a P.V.C. conduit from said pole six (6) feet to just behind
the iron fence as shown in submitted plan. There will be no x 4
• overhead wires attached to the proposed phone location.
F y
Richard Picone, representing New England Telephone, stated that the " 1
i
location was chosen because any other location would require 2--' 300 '
of digging. The phone will be located inside the fence. Mr. .
Picone noted that years ago there was a phone located opposite what
is now Sweet Scoops and that such phone was probably a booth. Mr.
Picone stated that the site will require a minimal amount of r«• )',
digging. Two telephone design choices were submitted which woulde,R ,.
be pedestal mounted. ,
Mr. Hedstrom asked why the phone would be located so close to the
Hawthorne Hotel where there are phone inside rather than on the
other side of the Common. Mr. Picone stated that there are poles
on Washington Square East, but would require some digging in the
street. Mr. Hedstrom asked if the phone would be lit. Mr. Picone
replied in the affirmative. .
Mr. Carr asked if the City Council Order was issued by Councillor '
Harvey. Mr Picone replied in the affirmative and stated that it
was also a request of the dog officer.
Mr. Cook stated that the phone would be incongruous to the demeanor
of the area. Mr. Cook felt that locating the phone close to the
hotel would deter people from tromping into the lobby of the hotel .
• `r:
Chairman Oedel opened the public hearing. '"
f
,
Y.� t
December 1, 1993, - Page 2 ,,
Regina Flynn, 62 Washington Square South, stated that, during the
past summer there were many problems with youth drinking and
selling drugs on the Common. Ms . Flynn felt that a telephone would
facilitate such activities . Ms . Flynn believed that a phone is
needed to assist people attending events on the Common and
suggested that a phone be placed outside of the rear of the
Hawthorne Hotel . Ms . Flynn also suggested that the dog officer
have a phone equipped in his car. Mr. Flynn stated that she and
her husband telephoned police over 15 times concerning public
drinking in the Common and felt that a telephone would add to the
problems .
Mr. Picone stated that he could not argue with Ms . Flynn' s opinion
that it would facilitate illegal activities, but noted that there
is also a public safety need.
i'
Mr. Slam asked what the need is . Mr. Hedstrom replied that if
someone were in some kind of trouble.
Mr. Carr stated that he is opposed to the application. Mr. Carr 4
stated that the City has made several strides over the years to •
improve the Common fence, lighting, grass, etc. Mr. Carr stated " .
that a phone would be a step in the opposite direction and that he N},
• did not feel there was a need since the Hawthorne Hotel has a bank
of phones . Mr. Carr felt a telephone at the back of the hotel fi
would bring "deals" to the hotel . . Mr. Carr preferred discreet
signage on the hotel which indicates that phones are located N
inside.
Mr. Cook stated that he agreed with points raised by Ms . Flynn' s,
but felt that the Common stands by itself and that a phone would
not disturb its aesthetics .
Chairman Oedel stated that it is not the Commission' s jurisdiction
to determine the need, although they may take it into account.
Mr. Picone asked if the Commission could put a condition on the
approval that if there are problems the phone must be removed. Mr.
Carr replied that the Commission could not since the decision is
one of historical appropriateness .
Mr. Hedstrom stated that a phone is inappropriate, but he would be
in favor of a phone in the area because it is unfair for the hotel
to receive such telephone traffic.
Mr. Slam suggested a telephone at the Phillips School .
Mr. Hedstrom suggested New England Telephone provide alternative
• locations .
F
Chairman Oedel asked if the Salem Common Neighborhood Association
B
l
.y
• December 1, 1993,kPage 3
s !
4
(SCNA) had an official position. Mr. Slam stated that Jane Lyness
would like to have the Commission study possibilities . T r
Councillor Leonard O'Leary stated that he was totally opposed to a
telephone being placed anywhere on the Common. Councillor%O'Leary
noted that a telephone had been placed on a house at Hawthorne
Boulevard but it was not used particularly for safety or
convenience. Councillor O'Leary felt that the Common would be the
worst place for a phone and that another location were there is
security should be proposed. ?-
r
Mr. Cook felt the discussion was leading out of the Commission' s
jurisdiction but felt that the Common was a logical place.
Mr. Slam stated that he all other issues are removed from the
discussion the application is not appropriate in terms of design.
Chairman Oedel stated that the application should probably be under
Hardship since any approval under Appropriateness would set a
precedent.
Mr. Carr stated that the Commission should consider the secondary
issues that an approval would effect such as the ramifications the
• Ms . Flynn and Councillor O'Leary outlined. Mr. Carr stated that
the Commission should not suggest alternatives but that New England
Telephone could propose alternatives . Mr. Carr stated that any v
alternative locations will also effect the homeowners in that area.
Ms . Guy stated that any new proposed locations will require abutter
notification.
Chairman Oedel stated that the issues are the appropriateness of
the site and design and that the SCNA would like to review the
proposal . Mr. Slam stated that he will contact Ms . Lyness .
Chairman Oedel suggested some sort of police call box.
Mr. Carr made a motion to continue the application. Mr. Hedstrom
seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion so carried.
Peabody Essex Museum
The Peabody Essex Museum presented applications for Certificates of
Appropriateness for signage alteration at 132 Essex Street, 80
Federal Street, 318 Essex Street and 138 Federal Street. Fred
Johnson, representing the Peabody Essex Museum, stated that two
signs will be removed - one from the Crowninshield/Bentley and one
from the Gardner/Pingree Houses . The signboards only will be
• changed at 80 Federal Street, 318 Essex Street, 138 Federal Street
and two at 132 Essex Street which are at the Plummer Hall and Brown
Street entrances . Mr. Johnson stated that the posts will remain in
,•F
'At :
• December 1, 1993;xPage 4
their current locations and they will use the same signs on the
Peabody Building. The sign height will increase while the;arm will
not project out as far.
Mr. Carr stated that he had no problem with the sign removal, but
preferred the design of the existing sign boards .
Mr. Johnson stated that the signs would be plywood traced with ,
hardwood, 2 sided, 4 1/4" thick with 8" reveal . The Plummer Hall
sign will also say "Essex Street Entrance" and the Brown Street
entrance will also state "Brown Street Entrance" .
r
Mr. Carr made a motion to waive the public hearing and approve the
application as submitted. Mr. Cook seconded the motion.
Chairman Oedel noted that the red color will not last and that the
Museum will be repainting on a regular basis due to fading.
Mr. Hedstrom stated that he found the lettering hard to read.
The motion was voted upon. All were in favor and the motion so :
carried. ;
• Minutes
Mr. Cook made a motion to approve the minutes of November 17, 1993 . "
Mr. Carr seconded the motion, all were in favor and the motion so i
carried.
Stop & Shop
Ms . Guy stated that the Peabody City.Council has requested that the s
Commission comment on the effects that the proposed Stop & Shop on
Boston Street would have on the archaeological aspects of the Old
South Burial Grounds . A letter from MHC to MEPA and the project
ENF indicate that there may be an effect on historical and
archaeological resources . MHC also questions if the current V.
boundaries of the burial ground are accurate. Ms . Guy stated that
a letter from Joan Sweeney of 22 Silver Street indicates that the
cemetery was annexed to Danvers (now Peabody) in 1856 .
The Salem Planning Board will have a public hearing concerning the
proposed Stop & Shop on December 2 at 7 : 30 p.m. Ms . Guy stated
that it appears that 160 Boston Street is slated for demolition.
Mr. Carr made a motion to send a representative to voice concern
that the Commission would be opposed to the demolition of 160
Boston Street and that the Commission finds that the project would
• have an adverse effect to the burial ground. There was no second.
Mr. Carr made a motion that to the extent that the matter involves
r
�4.
December 1, 1993,E PPp, 5'." 1
demolition of significant archaeological buildings in the area, :the
Commission would be opposed. Mr. Slam seconded the motion, all
were in favor and the motion so carried.
Other Business
Mr. Hedstrom stated that the trustees of One Broad Street have
selected their paint color. r
Y
A copy of a letter was received from the Peabody Historical
Commission to the Harmony Grove Cemetery trustees requesting
information needed to place the Harmony Grove Cemetery on the
National Register of Historic Places . •`..
Guidelines
The Commission reviewed and amended the guidelines on storm
windows . Mr. Hedstrom made a motion to approve the guidelines on
storm windows as amended. Mr. Cook seconded the motion, all were
in favor and the motion so carried.
The Commission reviewed and amended the guidelines on satellite
T.
dishes . Mr. Carr made a motion to approve the guidelines on
• satellite dishes as amended. Mr. Slam seconded the motion, all
were in favor and the motion so carried. t
r
There being no further business, Mr. Carr made a motion to adjourn.
Mr. Cook seconded the motion, all were in favor and the motion so
carried.
Respectfully submi ed,,
Y
Jane A. Gu`
Clerk of e Commis ion
r�w
T��