31 OSGOOD STREET - BUILDING INSPECTION / C �
No. 153L-2
HASTINGS. MN
LOS ANGELES-CHICAGO.LOGAN.ON
McGREGOR.T%-LOCUST GROVE.GA
U.S.A.
Citp of &atem, Aaoarbuzetto
36oarb of 4pea[ "
DECISION OF THE PETITION OF GERALDINE M. AYERS REQUESTING A
VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 31-33 OSGOOD STREET-R=21
A hearing on this petition was held September 20, 2000 with the following Board
Members present: Nina Cohen, Chairman, Richard Dionne, Stephen Buczko, Stephen
Harris and Paul Valaskagis. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and
notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in
accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
The petitioner is requesting Variances from lot area, lot coverage, parking, front, side
and rear setback regulations to allow a division of land for the property located at 31-33
Osgood Street R-2.
The Variances, which have been requested, may be granted upon a finding by this
Board that:
a. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building
or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and
structure involve.
• b. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve
substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioners.
c. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and
without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district of the
purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the
hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
1. Attorney Henry Lucas Esq. 133 Washington Street represented the petitioner.
2. The petitioner seeks variances to allow the division of the property located at 31-33
Osgood Street.
3. Lot 1 requires Variances for Lot area- 5498 s.f. proposed
Lot width— 15 ft. proposed
Side setback 9.8 ft. proposed
Rear setback—22.ft
Parking Variance
4. Lot 2 requires Variances for Lot area—3425 s.f.
Lot width—47.97 ft.
• Front setback—5.9 ft.
DECISION OF THE PETITION OF GERALDINE M. AYERS REQUESTING A
• VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 31-33 OSGOOD STREET R-2
page two
Side setback 3.6 ft.
Rear setback 22.0 ft.
Parking requirements
4. There was no opposition to the proposed petition.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on, the evidence presented at the
hearing, the Zoning Board of Appeal concludes as follows
1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the
district in general.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve
substantial hardship to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and
Without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the
purpose of the Ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted 5-0, to grant the Variances requested,
• subject to the following conditions;
1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state stature ordinances, codes and codes
regulations.
2. Petitioner shall obtain approval from any City Board or Commission having
jurisdiction including, but not limited to the Planning Board.
Variance Granted �C
September 20, 2000
Stephen Harris, Member
Board of Appeals
•
S
DECISION OF THE PETITION OF GERALDINE M. AYERS REQUESTING
• VARIANCES FOR THE PROPERTY 31-33 OSGOOD STREET R-2
page three
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND
THE CITY CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the
Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the
date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to
Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11. The Variance or Special
Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the
certificate of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed,
or that, if such appeal has been filed, that is has been dismissed or denied is
recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the
owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title.
•
•
Citp of 6aiem, 1Ca5!6arbu!6ett!5
HA
jBoarb of 2ppeal ' c ��E
no
N f^7
DECISION OF THE PETITION OF GERALDINE M. AYERS REQUESTING A
VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 31-33 OSGOOD STREET R-2
A hearing on this petition was held September 20, 2000 with the following Board
Members present: Nina Cohen, Chairman, Richard Dionne, Stephen Buczko, Stephen
Harris and Paul Valaskagis. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and
notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in
accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
The petitioner is requesting Variances from lot area, lot coverage, parking, front, side
and rear setback regulations to allow a division of land for the property located at 31-33
Osgood Street R-2.
The Variances, which have been requested, may be granted upon a finding by this
Board that:
a. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building
or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and
structure involve.
• b. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve
substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioners.
c. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and
without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district of the
purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the
hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
1. Attorney Henry Lucas Esq. 133 Washington Street represented the petitioner.
2. The petitioner seeks variances to allow the division of the property located at 31-33
Osgood Street.
3. Lot 1 requires Variances for Lot area- 5498 s.f. proposed
Lot width— 15 ft. proposed
Side setback 9.8 ft. proposed
Rear setback—22.ft
Parking Variance
4. Lot 2 requires Variances for Lot area—3425 s.f.
Lot width —47.97 ft.
• Front setback—5.9 ft.
DECISION OF THE PETITION OF GERALDINE M. AYERS REQUESTING A
• VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 31-33 OSGOOD STREET R-2
page two
Side setback 3.6 ft.
Rear setback 22.0 ft.
Parking requirements
4. There was no opposition to the proposed petition.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on, the evidence presented at the
hearing, the Zoning Board of Appeal concludes as follows
1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the
district in general.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve
substantial hardship to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and
Without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the
purpose of the Ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted 5-0, to grant the Variances requested,
• subject to the following conditions;
1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state stature ordinances, codes and codes
regulations.
2. Petitioner shall obtain approval from any City Board or Commission having
jurisdiction including, but not limited to the Planning Board.
Variance Granted
September 20, 2000
Stephen Harris, Member
Board of Appeals
•
r
r'
•1 DECISION OF THE PETITION OF GERALDINE M. AYERS REQUESTING
VARIANCES FOR THE PROPERTY 31-33 OSGOOD STREET R-2
page three
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND
THE CITY CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the
Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the
date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to
Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11. The Variance or Special
Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the
certificate of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed,
or that, if such appeal has been filed, that is has been dismissed or denied is
recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the
owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title.
•
•
r \ 4�-•ec�.
N
LOcu5
V.)
°�� sT l l�IIGLIN/1 G 4 JOA.U.U£ 8.
bN\
(�(LREflULT
Locus tiP
SCALE: /' ZOOO' 570S
S�
' RORE2T F. � l2£,VE 8.
/VO 7'E ' h0 66 ` COP AJFLC
GOT 8 TO (3E COVVEV60 TO ti0 scoo
s9 .
TH£ SU 6
01U15/o Ur2EpE21CK F € GFRI�o%UE r . f �
MN2 E. CouGNty S
Rye2S TO F02/9 OvE C0,01160ous CO rI20.L 6190 V07' 2£OUl2£D
0� LOT- C
5.f SfICFH PCRVXIWG BOIM0.
0 3
� ��' F2EOE21GK F. r.F-IM .01A1£ ALINOH S-0'82/fN
\A0 00 19YEtz
r �� LOT f7
tf25 r� H= 746VS.r
O �
S
c
A� a
�O o �
. o? �� a R0�/AL0 F 1/H2Ct=l
O
w 00
so Q�v
.\ ,y B ��. � - x#33
s0
2 /7-13 0006911A/
c .
RAN OF L4AJD
w\
/ cF2>if-v r/-Mr T<ils P, AnV cawrarc,f.�s
-r7'ar gars A,,r0 7�1r- IN
/. . . . �, ,. ' .• C Oma/
SHL EM
PI "l e/l i'✓ o/
COUG-Nl IN, r a
SCALE l"- 20 ' DECEMBER 7, /997
O /o to qO Go
R08ERr 8. BoGJMRN, R. P.L. S.
/8/ Ess Ex ST2E£f S41 69, MASS.
//050
BOARDOF ASSESSORS
93 WASHINGTON STREET, CITY HALL, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 (617)745-9595 Ext.261
n { K
August 10, 1988
ID
D =L,
cn w
Mrs. Josephine R. Fusco
City Clerk
City of Salem
Salem, MA 01970
Dear Mrs. Fusco:
Please be advised that the proposed new single family house
to be constructed on Assessors' Parcel #36-0265, on which
the existing building of 33TOsgood—StreeV currently sits,
has been assigned the st eet address of—131 Osgood—Street31 Osgood—Street.
tr ly yours,
v/
Peter M. Caron
Chief Assessor
PMC:mjg
cc: Postmaster Joseph J. Leccese
Chief Joseph F. Sullivan, Fire Department
Margaret R. Hagerty, Principal Clerk, Water Dept.
,i lliam H. Munroe, Inspector of Buildings
Engineering Dept. , City of Salem
Mr. Frederick Ayers, 33 Osgood St. , Salem
Citp of *a[em, Iflaggacbm5ettg
+i a Public Propertp Mcpartment
jOuilbing Mepartment
One 6alem Oreen
745-9595 Ext. 380
William H. Munroe
Director of Public Property
Inspector of Buildings
Zoning Enforcement Officer
October 3, 1988
Mr. Robert Connell
8 East Collins St.
Salem, MA 01970
RE:-31--33 Osgood St.
t --
Dear Mr. Connell:
In reference to your letter dated September 18, 1988, an
inspection of the above referenced property was conducted and it
was found that construction is indeed within the conditions set
by the Board of Appeal in their decision dated October 28, 1987.
Sincerely,
jJames D. Santo
Assistant Building Inspector
JDS:bms
cc: Ward Councillor
file
pITi
u , e
LAND COURT SURVEYS DEVELOPMENTS REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR REGISTEIIEO CIVIL ENGINEER
LOT SURVEYS
CONSULTING
PARSONS AND FA((IA, INC.
ifiud CIRJIIIbzli and stli VEyn41
_ 593-7927
4B0 LINCOLN AVENUE SAUGUS, MASSACIIUSIE TS
AE-)2,2� C ✓✓ECC
"l
,
-,Fo
47 C3
UNOOZ �BNl7)Lut w / rip
a tj
- /O /b GN CD
f
• f/
Z- c�Zry i�'1T T� �u/F"Cuu�y
(�nlp� CON/?7L`/[�o✓ �//J i✓eT Cn.✓fn/Lnf
i
1 P �F
I.
fCHARLES
DANIEL �.
j' F A
r / C 1 TEaEO-.�
o c7 Z rd /9 1J