The URL can be used to link to this page

25 OSGOOD STREET - BUILDING INSPECTION 25 OSGOOD STREET Slll1 uu No. 153L•2 HASTINGS. MN LOS ANGELES-CHICAGO-LOGAN.OR MCGREGOR,T%-LOCUST GROVE,GA U.S.A. CITY OF SALEM9 MASSACHUSETTS PUBLIC PROPERTY DEPARTMENT 120 WASHINGTON STREET, 3RD FLOOR ��MINB� SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 STANLEY J. USOVICZ, JR. TELEPHONE: 978-745-9595 EXT. 380 MAYOR FAX: 978-740-9846 REQUIRED INSPECTI_ON �\VI PROPERTY LOCATION 25 OSGOOD STREET' rMarci 3„-2006-1 Micheal Sheppard 25 Osgood Street Salem, MA 01970 Dear Mr. Sheppard; The above referenced property has come to the attention of this department for the following reason(s): 3'd Floor Apartment is not allowed at this address, this inspection is to ensure that this property is in compliance with Zoning. Under the provisions of 780 CMR, Section 115.6, State Building Code, access to this property must be granted for the purposes of inspection. Please call this office upon receipt of this letter to schedule this required inspection. If this property has rental units, these tenants must be notified in advance of this inspection, so that access to these spaces may also be accomplished. This inspection must be completed on or before March 17, 2006; failure to respond to this notification will be construed as non-compliance, and as such an Administrative Search Warrant will be sought, so as to allow the lawful inspection of this property. If you have any further questions regarding this letter, please call this office at (978) 745-9595, extension 386. Sincerely, djoseph E. Barbeau, Jr. Assistrant Building Inspector CC: file CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS PUBLIC PROPERTY DEPARTMENT o 120 WASHINGTON STREET, 3RD FLOOR A��MMe DO SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 STANLEY J. USOVICZ, JR. TELEPHONE: 978-745-9595 EXT. 380 MAYOR FAX: 978-740-9846 REQUIRED INSPECTION PROPERTY LOCATION 25 OSGOOD STREET March 3„ 2006 Micheal Sheppard 25 Osgood Street Salem, MA 01970 Dear Mr. Sheppard; The above referenced property has come to the attention of this department for the following reason(s): 3rd Floor Apartment is not allowed at this address, this inspection is to ensure that this property is in compliance with Zoning. Under the provisions of 780 CMR, Section 115.6, State Building Code, access to this property must be granted for the purposes of inspection. Please call this office upon receipt of this letter to schedule this required inspection. If this property has rental units, these tenants must be notified in advance of this inspection, so that access to these spaces may also be accomplished. This inspection must be completed on or before March 17, 2006; failure to respond to this notification will be construed as non-compliance, and as such an Administrative Search Warrant will be sought, so as to allow the lawful inspection of this property. If you have any further questions regarding this letter, please call this office at (978) 745-9595, extension 386. Sincerely, dosleph E. Barbeau, Jr. Assistrant Building Inspector CC: file CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTSCITY OF SALEM:MA i BOARD OF APPEAL CLERK'S OFFICE 120 WASHINGTON STREET, 3RD FLOOR SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 STANLEY J. LISOVICZ, JR. TELEPHONE: 978-745-9595 2815 SEP ?2 P 2: O MAYOR FAX: 978-740-9846 DECISION OF THE PETITION OF MICHAEL SHEPPARD REQUESTING A VARIANCE AND SPECIAL PERMITFOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 25 OSGOOD STREET R-2 A hearing on this petition was held September 21, 2005 meeting with the following Board Members were present: Nina Cohen Chairman, Robin Stein Nicholas Halides, Bonnie Belair and Richard Dionne. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. At the request of the Petitioner, the Salem Board of Appeal voted 5-0, to grant leave to withdraw this petition without prejudice for Variances from lot coverage, lot area, and addition unit and a Special Permit to alter a non-conforming dwelling for the property located at 25 Osgood Street located in an R-1 zone. GRANTED LEAVE TO WITHDRAW WITHOUT PREJUDICE September 21, 2005 UrL Nina Cohen, Chairmar} r1l.- Board of Appeal l A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal w C1ii#g of �lcm, � tt��ttcl�¢� ts3 iz PPS °8T Pourb of (�pp£Zl1 fllE r M QiTY CURK. LALEF;.MASS. DECISION ON THE_PETITION OF MARY COOGLIN FOR A VARIANCE FOR--2-5- ST -2) A hearing on this petition was held October 7, 1987 with the following Board Members present: James Hacker, Chairman; Bencal, Fleming, Luzinski and Strout. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. The petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting Variances from residential density regulations, Section VI, Table 1 , including minimum lot area, lot area per dwelling unit, and lot width to allow conveyance of approximately 1466 sq.ft'. of land to the abutting neighbor at 31-33 Osgood St. The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board that: ' a. special conditions exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings, and structures in the same district; b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would involve a substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner; c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . Transferring of property will leave petitioner will an excess or 7,800 sq.ft. of land which is about double the size of most lots in the neighborhood; 2. No opposition; 3. Major neighborhood support. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . Special conditions exist which affect the subject property but not the district generally; 2. Literal enforcement of the Ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioner; 3. The requested Variance can be granted without detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF MARY COUGHLIN FOR A VARIANCE FOR 25 OSGOOD ST. , SALEM page two Therefore the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the Variance as requested. VARIANCE GRANTED aures B. Hacker, Chairman A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK APPEAL TH S DECISION. IF ANY. SHALL BE M DE PCRSUANT TO SECTION 17 OF THE MASS EEF.ERAL LA:'.S. Ci'>TER BOB. ARDp SHALL BE nLEJ P.iTHI'7 20 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF FILING DF TnIS SI^R IS THE OFFICE OF THE CIT I CLERti ur YARIAKCF CE SPE.".IAL PER:-'.17 1' - " r R.d L. S CHI E. £� S"-'i0 il. �.... EE.,, THE C[RT- iVb,".:. ' r L. SHn L N:i i4d EFFECT UI -L A Cn�Y OF Ti .PCAL H'S --EN FILED. Cf "i.,, LRP CLER:: iHAT 20 DAYS Hn E ELAPSED !.t_ T.0Is ',R 1H'.i. IF 5J'.�: AN APPEAL HAS 6E Eli FILE. THAT IT HAS BEEN DIS;i.1S$iD DF CENIED T REr—RIOF ORD Ili ORTIS P,"_CDRDEESSEX ANDRECISIF EDYOR THE�OVINER'SDS AND I'CERIIf1�CATE OF TITLE.tj�,DER THE „IP,E OF TH BOARD OF APPEAL (fTitU lif 1�;al£nt, �41�c�ss�ch115Ptf5 !? • \W T- �� j lainliuS �Darl @nr gmalrm (6rrrn x 4�4 ,'Do fL FORM A - DECISION CITY CLER ..3ALfY,. kA4g. Ms. Josephine Fusco City Clerk City Hall Salem, MA 01970 Dear Ms. Fusco: At a regularly scheduled meeting of ti:e Sales Planning Board held on January 21, 1988, it was voted to endorse "F._Proval Under Sub- division Control Law Not Required" on the following described plan: 1. Applicant: Mary E. Coughlin 25 Osgood Street Salem, MA 01970 2. Location and Description - 25 Osgood Street and is multi-family residential. Deed of property records in Essex South District Registry. Sincerely, Walter Power III Chairman WP/sm