46-48 ORNE STREET - BUILDING INSPECTION _a ..
«-�-�1
1
Plans must be filed and approved by the Inspector
prior to a permit being granted -
/� CITY OF SALEM
No. �� — 7 Ward (a -
HISTORIC
HISTORIC DISTRICT? Y N Obi Date—Lc-�-I
IF FOR SIDING, HAS ELECTRIC Home Phone 7,- ( l.S�i1
PERMIT BEEN OBTAINED? Y N Bus. Phone 60 fR3L-0Z1Q
APPLICATION •---
FOJR
PERMIT TO � LV— V- POU��I
TO THE INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS:
The undersigned hereby applies for a permit to build according to the
following specifications:
Owner's name and address
Architect's name
Builder's name
Location of building, No.
What is the purpose of building? � ��
If dwelling, # of units? Material of bldng? Ltd
Will building conform to law? YDS Asbestos? �d _—..'-_.',T:,_:..
Estimated cost ' a City Lic.# State Lia#
Signature of Applicant
SIGN UNDE THE PENALTY OF PERJURY
DESCRIPTION OF WORK TO BE DONE \
Mail Permit to:
t
�' � t , � � � � ' y��a3`'��t 'iiy hit .-,. s �lJ,..t f ��'¢" ��r�•� ��; I q w � � :.f.� �
u
Ward Co
APPLICATION FOR
PERMIT TO ROOF
REROOF OR INSTALL SIDING
Location yE
PERMIT GRANTED //
/0 R 199 L/
Approved
l^q(au spec
s'
yT JUL J I i 2j SU
/ (lIit of , 5alem, '�ttssadweetts
lBottra of 'AuPeal :,11 r
DECISION ON ,THE PETITION-OF .RANDY EMMANS FOR A Jul
VARIANCE AT 46-48 ORNE ST.—(R-2)
A hearing on this petition was held June 27, 1990 with the following Board
Members present: Richard Bencal , Chairman; Edward Luzinski , Vice Chairman;
Joseph Correnti , Secretary; Richard Febonio and Mary Jane Stirgwolt. Notice of
the meeting was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were
properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts
General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting a Variance to allow existing
two family dwelling to be converted into a three family dwelling in this R-2 zone.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board
that:
a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land,
building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other
lands, buildings or structures in the same district;
b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve
substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner;
c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public
good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of
the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal , after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the
hearing and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
1 . There was substantial neighborhood opposition to the petition.
2. Letter of opposition with twenty (20) names of abutters opposing the
petition was submitted.
3. Petitioner offered no evidence of hardship.
4. The granting of the variance would not be in harmony with the neighborhood.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the
hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . Special conditions do not exist which especially affect the subject property
and not the district in general .
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would not
involve substantial hardship on the petitioner.
3. The relief requested cannot be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good or without nullifying and substantially derogating from the intent
of the district and the purpose of the Ordinance.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RANDY EMMONS FOR A VARIANCE
AT 46-48 ORNE ST. , SALEM
page two
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 0-5, against the granting
of the requested Variance. Having failed to garner the required four affirmative
- votes to pass, the motion to grant fails and the petition is denied.
VARIANCE DENIED.
tcha�io, Member, Board of Appeal
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 Yl
the Mass. General Laws, Chapter 808, and shall be filed within 20 day$
alt^_r the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk.
Pur cant to ivlass. General Laws, Chap-.er 808, Section ii, the Variance
or +oecial Permit ;ranted herein shall not tike effcct a^til a cony of the
derision, bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have
elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been
filed, that it has been dismissee or denied is recorded in the South Esta[
Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name or the owner of record Q -
Is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title.
BOARD OF APPEAL