REVIEW OF HOUSING PROPOSALS 6 7
Housi G PROJECT
A
44
W
4
;4—tf,
All
r
&Its 5
4,.r z
'41'p
T�
2 U,
ZademH
Redevelopment
TELEPHONE 744-6900
Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 7A4-4580
TO: Members of the Salem Redevelopment Authority
Members of the Salem Housing Authority
FROM: Chris Olney, SRA Project Administrator
William Farrell, SHA Director
RE: Evaluation of Proposals for Development of Parcel R-1A
(Mazzarini Lot)
DATE: September 14, 1979
Proposals from development teams to design the 667-6 pr oject and to design
and build market rate housing on Parcel R-lA are due on September 21, 1979. The
evaluation of proposals and the selection of a development team by the SRA and
SHA will require the cooperation of both agencies and an easily understood
evaluation process.
To accomplish this, we -recommend that each member of the Authorities use a
"score card!' to evaluate the proposals. We also suggest that the Authorities
meet together on September 25th (at the SHA meeting) to discuss the evaluation
process and to take a preliminary look at the proposals. The first week of
October, the Authorities shoul d meet again at a special meeting to conduct inter
views (if necessary) and hopefully to agree on the selection of the Development
Team.
The score card is going to be an important tool, and deserves special atten-
tion. Therefore, we have come up with a draft for you to review and to suggest
changes. A score card should be formally adopted at the first, joint meeting on
Sept, 11,
The score card has 100 points. The "perfect" developer proposal would get a
score of 100. Each proposal will be evaluated in accordance with the Request for
Proposals which has been distributed during the past rOnth. As you can see,
various aspects of each proposal will be weighed differently, depending on their
importance. You should thin], about the scoring system - whether these are the
things that should be evaluated, whether other items should be added, and how
many points should be given to each item.
Attached is the score card and the request for proposals. Please call on
either of us with any questions or comments.
CC: Mayor Jean A. Levesque
Gregory Senko
Bill Gaines, Dept. of Community Affairs
EVALUATION SCORE CARD
L
A. Evaluation of Developer Team
1. Qualifications of Developer TOTAL POSSIBLE 20
Previous projects Your Score
Experience with housing
References
2. Qualifications of Architect TOTAL POSSIBLE 20
Previous projects Your Score
667 Experience
References
B., Evaluation of Design Concept
3. Compliance with 667 Requirements TOTAL POSSIBLE 15
Your Score
4. Compliance with Urban Renewal Criteria TOTAL POSSIBLE is
Your Score
S. Understanding of Salem TOTAL POSSIBLE 10
Awareness of environment Your Score
Analysis of impact on City
Identify private housing market
Discuss approvals, agencies, etc.
C. Evaluation of Finances and Timetable
6. Cost estimates for construction, land
acquisition, etc. TOTAL POSSIBLE s
Your Score *
7. Timetable TOTAL POSSIBLE s
Your Score
D. Proposal Format
8. Answer all questions, quality of presentation TOTAL POSSIBLE 5
Your��- Score
9. Raise issues, offer alternative solutions TOTAL POSSIBLE 5
Your Score . . . . . . . . .
General Comments:
WE OF DEVELOPTNENT TEAM
EVALUATED BY
EVALUATION SCORE CARD
A. Evaluation of Developer Team
1. Qualifications of Developer TOTAL POSSIBLE 20
Previous projects Your Score
E -perience with housing
x
References
2. Qualifications of Architect TOTAL POSSIBLE .20
Previous projects Your Score
667 Experience
References
B. Evaluation of Design Concept ,
3. Compliance with 667 Requirements TOTAL POSSIBLE is
Your Score
4. Compliance with Urban Renewal Criteria TOTAL POSSIBLE is
Your Score
S. Understanding of Salem TOTAL POSSIBLE 10
Awareness of environment Your Score
Analysis of impact on City
Identify private housing market
Discuss approvals, agencies, etc.
C. Evaluation of Finances and Timetable
6. Cost estimates for construction, land
acquisition, etc. TOTAL POSSIBLE 5
Your Score
7. Timetable TOTAL POSSIBLE 5
Your Score
D. Proposal Format
8. Answer all questions, quality of presentation TOTAL POSSIBLE 5
Your Score
9. Raise issues, offer alternative solutions TOTAL POSSIBLE 5
Your Score . . . . . . . . . .
General Comments:
NA1,E OF DEVELOPMENT TEAM
EVALUATED BY
EVALUATION SCORE CARL)
A. Evaluation of Developer Team
1. Qualifications of Developer TOTAL POSSIBLE 20
Previous projects Your Score
Experience with housing
References
2. Qualifications of Architect TOTAL POSSIBLE 20
Previous projects Your Score
667 Experience
References
B. Evaluation of Design Concept
3. Compliance with 667 Requirements TOTAL POSSIBLE is
Your Score
4. Compliance with Urban Renewal Criteria TOTAL POSSIBLE Is
Your Score
S. Understanding of Salem TOTAL POSSIBLE 10
Awareness of environment Your Score
Analysis of impact on City
Identify private housing market
Discuss approvals, agencies, etc.
C. Evaluation of Finances and Timetable
6. Cost estimates for construction, land
acquisition, etc. TOTAL POSSIBLE 5
Your Score � —
7. Timetable TOTAL POSSIBLE 5
Your Score
D. Proposal Format
Answer all questions, quality of presentation TOTAL POSSIBLE 5
Your.-- Score
9. Raise issues, offer alternative solutions TOTAL POSSIBLE S
Your Score
General Comments:
WE OF DEVELOMENT TEAM
EVALUATED BY
EVALUATION SCORE CARD
A.. Evaluation of Developer Team.
1. Qualifications of Developer TOTAL POSSIBLE 20
Previous projects Your Score
Experience with housing
References
2. Qualifications of Architect TOTAL POSSIBLE 20
Previous projects Your Score
667 Experience
References
B. Evaluation of Design Concept
3. Compliance with 667 Requirements TOTAL POSSIBLE is
Your Score
4. Compliance with Urban Renewal Criteria TOTAL POSSIBLE is
Your Score
S. Understanding of Salem TOTAL POSSIBLE 10
Awareness of environment Your Score
Analysis of impact on City
Identify private housing market
Discuss approvals, agencies, etc.
C. Evaluation of Finances and Timetable
6. Cost estimates for construction, land
acquisition, etc. TOTAL POSSIBLE 5
Your Score
7. Timetable TOTAL POSSIBLE
Your Score
D. Proposal Format
8. Answer all questions, quality of presentation TOTAL POSSIBLE S.
Your.- Score
9. Raise issues, offer alternative solutions TOTAL POSSIBLE 5
Your Score
General Comments:
WE OF DEVELOPNENT TEAM
EVALUATED BY
jLPM, U7:j
WrIcubLifte -4432
- 744
GEORGE A-AUSERTIN,Chairman
YVONNE LYSIAK,Vice-Chairman
-'i�RY J. LoPOINTE.Tr..s.,.,&State Board Represen-,twe,
STEPHEN ZISSON,Member
RICHARD T.FEBONIO, Member
3?03,E:RXF-X2MO29XQR,Executive Director-Secretary
William J. Farrell
Redeavelop, , I-ell 2t
Authofil 9 TELEPHONE 744-6900
rily ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 744-4580
1;EQUEST FOR PIUPOSALS
The Salem Housing Authority (SHA) and the Salem Redevelopment Authority (SR70
jointly invite proposals for the development of parcel R-lA in the downtown urban
kenewal area-foit'-public *and private residential: units. The parcel of land, tF.4ned-
by the Redevelopment Authority, contains approximately 50,000 sq. ft. and is
located at the cornerof Bridge and St. Peter Streets. in Salem.
Thesite has been tentatively selected for the construction of 60 units of
elderly housing, to be funded with a. grant of $1.9 million by the Massachusetts
Executive Office of com=dties and E)evelps�t under the provisions .of Chapter-
667 of the Acts of 1954.
Both Authorities have *agreed-to ensure the beneficial integration of the
public elderly housing and conventionally financed housing on this site.by jointly
requesting propo.sals. for developnent con.sistent .wit I h the overall o6jectives of the
urban renewal plan and the 667 Housing.Program. The selected development team will
be zzaarded the design c.ontract for the elderly housing by the Housing Authority
and will purchase the site from the Redevelo,--rent Authority for the construction
of cmventional housing.
Proposals m-ist contain the folicwing:
1) Schematic description of the project including a site plan indicating public
inprovenients, proposed buildings, etc.; scherratic plans, elevations, and
renderings sufficient to describe the project, would be helpful.
-2-
Note: The selection of a developrr�t team will notnecessarily constitute approval
of their design oonc�pt.
2) Estimated construction cost for the project, breaking out the cost of the
elderly housing; the cost of site iuprovexrents; the cost of public impxove-
ments such. as utilitie5,streets and sidewalks, etc. and the cost of the private housing
3) Estinated maxket value of the conventional (private) housing.
4) Estimated schedule for the total development, indicating dates for corpletion of
design, obtaining necessamy permits, obtaining financing, construction start and
occupancy. Within 60 days of designation as developer, a final construction
schedule must be established.
5) Listof permits, variances, etc. needed to proceed to conpleticn.
6) Resale price of real estate containing Public housing to the Salem Hous'
ing
Authority-
7) Estimated tax return of this project to the City at the current tax ratee
with a brief description of the inpact on muaicipal. services of the project when
occupied.
0) Principal menbe= of the development team, including the architect. Describe
how the team will be organized. A list of projects a=mplished by the team and
references. would be helpful. Projectsacconplished. by individual team .menbers would
also be beneficial.
.9) Evidence of finahcial c=nmitment for the conventional housing-
In preparing proposals, prospective developers should address the following
points:
a. Parcel R-lA should contain at Icka t 12 conventional housing units.
b. Parking for residents must be aco I omnodated on the site- conventional housing
requires at least 1-1� spaces per unit. Elderly hou�ing requires 1/3 space per unit-
C. Parcel RC-2, located in the immediate vicinity is presently the subject of
an option to buy, but my become available by the end of this year- The selected
developer may be given the opportunity to develop this parcel should the owner of
the option fail to exercise his rights in accordance with the terms of the option.
7e
1herefore, prospective developers Pay submit tentative proposals for the developm Trt
of this parcel as well. This parcel will be considered for conventional housing
only and it is anticipated that it could accorimclate a minimLzn of 20 units.
d. All land owned by the Redevelopment Authority shall be sold at fair market value
as determined by independent appraisers. Recent appraisals have placed a value of
$1.SO to $2.00 per square foot for land in this area based on low density residential-
development. 1he portion of Parcel R-lA to be developed for Chapter 667 ho-using
will be transferred directly from the Redevelopment Authority to the Housing Authority.
e. The selected developer must abide by the requireme nts established in the Heritage
Plaza-East Urban Renewal Plan. Of special concern are the "Urban. Design Criteriat,
set out as Exhibit IV in the Plan.
f. The design construction of the elderly housing shall conform to the procedures
established under Chapter 667 of the Acts of 1954. This portion of. the project �wili
be publicly bid. In preparing the proposals prospective. developers should be aware
of the following factors: (a) construction budget my not exceed $1.8 million, (b)
the building will consist of no more than 43,200 gross square feet, and will provide
approximately 2,300 gross square feet of non-ch-relling space, and (c) the project ,riU
require approximately 20 on-grade parking spaces.
g. Simultaneous, development of both private and public housing shall occur through-
out the project development, including all plans prepared for design and construction.
Progress payments for design of the 667 housing shall be made on the basis of percent,-.--
of completion of performance, which percentage must be the same for the public and-
private portions of the project.
h. The Authorities shall jointly review all proposals and shall jointly select the
development team which is determined to be most qualified and whose plan best addressess
the criteria and objectives set forth in the Request for Proposals. The Authorities
reserve the right to reject any and all proposals.
IAL
SalemEs
Redevelopment
TELEPHONE 744-6900
Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 744-4580
Gentlemen:
In iry absence tonight I would like to pass on rffy evaluation of last.
week's neeting with DCA and also an opinion regarding today's selection of
a developnent team.
First let m say that there was no way to even discuss the issue of
their turning dimm the Pasquanna/Scagliotti Team as the chosen developer.
Their points, I feel, were valid: 1) on grade parking is a firm requireffent.
of 667 housing; 2) the Scagliotti plan showed no detail whatsoever of the
conmunity room and in fact "it!' did show below grade parking; 3) the density
of the proposed housing did not even neet the State requirenents as far as
being too clustered and too close to property boundaries.
Conversation with these mn with the "mney" displayed their feeling
that since this corrbined public and private housing venture was a first,
they were not interested in entertaining the choice we had nade.
For them to condomour choice would leave them open to criticim all
over the State and it would also establish new guidelines for future developments
of this kind.
Frankly, they could not understand why we, knowing the guidelines, could
have chosen the one architect who had not followed thern.
Now, regarding tonight's choice, it is a difficult decision especially
considering each developer has sorre very unique and interesting approach to the
site. I have arrived at my choice through analysis of various points which I found
to be necessary for the overall package.
I am not sure how Salern oriented Kieth Properties would be and I do not feel
their proposal to be as inforiTative as I would like to have seen.
My unprofessional opinion of the Robertsen-Corinthian, Ltd. proposal is
that, architecturally, it might be weak. Also, their associates could lend
assistance they ndght need. I am not certain that they understand how 667 requirements
can blow an ordinary budget out of proportion.
-2-
Stern-Tise seems to have the qualifications and experience.,both
development wise and architecturally,that this unique project needs. They
have proven themselves to Salem in the quality construction that has already
taken place in Salem by them.
The point that they made regarding building 667 housing first was no
problem with the DCA and as was stated at our Boston meeting, this would most
likely occu no matter who the builder is, primarily because of site restrict-ions.
I am sorry I cannot be with you tonight to formally vote on this matter
and ask you to take my opinions in consideration when it cones time to nuke the
final decision.
Respectfully,
Joan Boudreau
PASQUANNA
--T
DEVELOPERS, INC.
JL9 d16 58 Collins Strcet Lyfln, Mass. 01902
(617) 599-6820
September 21 , 1979
Salem Housing Authority
27 Charter Street
Salem , Mass. 01970
and
Salem Redevelopment Authority
One Salem Green
Salem , Ma. 01970
Re . Development of Parcel R-lA
Salem , Ma. ,
Gentlemen:
in response to your "Request for Proposals" for the development
of parcel R-lA in the downtown urban renewal area for public
and private residential units , Pasquanna Developers , Inc. submits
the following proposal :
1. A total of 72 units of which 60 will be for public housing and
12 for private housing will be provided in two story clustered
garden type buildings. Required parking and community space
will be provided under dwelling units at lower level on
Bridge Street.
Enclosed are drawings consisting of perspec tive , site plan,
floor plans and building elevations.
2 . The estimated construction cost of the project is Two million
one hundred thirty three thousand dollars ($2 , 133 , 000. ) broken
down as follows:
a. . Construction cost of private housing ( including
land cost) $335 ,500
b. Construction cost of -nublic housing (excluding
land cost and architect fees) $1 , 698 ,500
c. Construction cost of site improvements $33 ,500
d. Construction cost of public improvements $15 ,500
3. The market value of private housing is estimated at $425 , 000
---continued---
PASQUANNA
DEVELOPERS, INC. Est,
1976
58 Collins Street Lynn, Mass. 01902
(617) 599-6820
Re : Development of Parcel R-1A
Salem, Mass.
Page -2- .
4. We estimate the project schedule as follows :
a. Design completion - 3 months
b. Approval by appropriate agencies - unknown
c. Obtaining permits - two weeks
d. Obtaining financing (for Private housing) two months
e . Construction - 12 months
f. Occupancy - approximately 18 months unless agency approvals
are delayed.
5.. Permits required for this project are , building permit,
plumbing permit , electrical permit, occupancy permit.
6. Resale price of real estate containing public housing is
estimated at the sum of construction cost of housing, site
and public improvements, cost of land , and cost of archite,ct
fees.
7. Estimated tax return to city on private housing is $16 , 000
per year.
8. The development team will consist of. Pasquanna Developers , Inc.
(John DeIulis , President ; Mario DeIulis , Treasurer and Clerk and
Frank DeIulis, Vice President) and Robert L. Scagliotti , AIA, Inc.
. Architect.
Pasquanna Developers . have successfully redeveloped the Old
Custom House , Salem, Mass (13 apartments and 4 retail stores) ,
and Chatham St. School , Lynn, Mass. (12 apartments ) . We are
currently undertaking the development of parcel RC-11G in the
urban renewal. area of downtown Salem. This project consists of
34 dwelling units and 16 retail stores.
The principals of Pasquanna Developers , inc. are also principals
of DeIulis Brothers Construction Co. , Inc . which has experience
in all types of building construction and site development.
For experience of Robert L. Scagliotti , AIA, Inc. refer to
enclosed resume and summary of current and past projects.
---continued---
PASQUANNA ...
DEVELOPERS, INC.
1976
58 Collins Street Lynn, Mass. 01902
-----�617)�599-6820
Re : Development of Parcel R-lA
Salem, Mass.
Page
9. Financing for private hQusing will be provided as follows :
a. Construction financing by Delulis Brothers Construction
Co. , Inc. and Essexbank.
b. At completion of project , Essexbank will either provide
permanent financing or obtain same from other sources.
If Pasquanna Developers , Inc. is selected as developer , we
will furnish financial statements and firm commitments for
financing project.
We believe that our proposal offers the best possible solutior�
to the many problems presented by the site location, contour
and size limitations.
if our proposal is accepted , we can assure you that the design
of the project and the construction . of private housing will be
carried out expeditiously to your satisfaction and on schedule.
Very truly yours ,
PASQUANNA DEVELOPERS , INC .
Frank DeIulis , Vice President
FD/ph
ROBERT L. SCAGLIOTTI
President
Professional Data
Boston Architectural Center, School of Architecture, Boston, Massachusetts
Registered Architect: Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York
National Council of Architectural Registration Boards, Registration No. 10,837
American Institute of Architects
Massachusetts State Association of Architects
Boston Society of Architects
Chairman of Design Review Board,Salem, Massachusetts
Preservation Committee of the Boston Society of Architects
Past'Chairman,Salem Historial Commission (1973)
Background
Over twenty years experience in conceptual architectural design, project administration and construction man?,gement
in environmental laboratories, institutional and educational buildings, bank buildings, space system facilities, eccles-
iastical structures,corporate offices, condominiums,community buildings, postal and commercial facilities.
Experience
1955-1966 Architectural designer, administrator and construction manager on a variety of projects with two pro-
minent architectural firms.
1966-1973 At a Boston Arch itectural-Engi neeri ng firm, responsible for design, administration and construction
management of several environmental laboratory projects, space system facilities, educational instit-
utions, office and commercial buildings. Responsibilities included conceptual design of total project
as well as design of interior furnishings.
1973—Present Private practice in Salem, Massachusetts
Projects include bank institutions, condominium living units with total site planning, community
facilities, United States Postal Service facilities,, newspaper printing plant and offices, industrial
facilities,specialty shops, shopping malls,and historical studies for the National Park Service.
As Consulting Architect to the.Salem Redevelopment Authority, projects include restoration and
rehabilitation of buildings with historical and architectural significance.
ROBERT L. SCAGLIOTTI, AIA, INC.
Architects
Experience Related to Historic Preservation
Restoration in Portsmouth, Alew Hampshire
Preparation of initial site plan for Strawberry Banke, Incorporated.
Preparation of architectural designs and architectural contract documents for the restoration of buildings on Penhallow
Street and South Street area.
Our Vanishing Heritage
Member of Committee on Historic Preservation, Boston Society of Architects, publishers of Our Vanishing Heritage,
a booklet on historic preservation in New England.
Salem Redevelopment Authority, Heritage Plaza—East, Consulting Architect
Preparation of plans, specifications and contracts for rehabilitation and facade casements to be undertaken with project
funds for restoration of buildings with historical and architectural significance.
Establishment of rehabilitation standards on buildings not slated for acquisition but having historical significance and
architectural value.
Review of schematic presentations by developers as to exterior appearance, and recommendation of acceptance or re-
jection of proposal to Salem Redevelopment Authority.
Approval of final contract documents prior to building permit issuance by building inspector for all projects in Heritage
Plaza—East.
Supervision of Clerk-of-Works on all projects in Heritage Plaza—East area including authorization of payment and final
acceptance.
Awards
Selected to represent New Hampshire in national competition sponsored by Portland Cement Association (1964).
Modern Manufacturing national "Top Ten Plant Award" to Gillette Toiletries Company, Andover, Massachusetts
(1970). Arch itects-E nginee rs—Anderson-Nichols and Company, Inc. — Project Architect.
Boston Society of Architects "Preservation Award"to Salem Redevelopment Authority (1975) —Consulting Architect
with Salem Redevelopment Authority.
ROBERT L. SCAGLIOTTI, AIA, INC.
Architects
—---------
VA ri
C I IF
Ll
ZA U
I Aa=ov �,14;Q
z:=zl�-
W7�7�
Ll
-,-1 7-1
t"7jri if'
_:7r
Ll ri I
It
IN
MEMI
t em�
Al
f r
-------------------
344-0330 KEITH PROPERTIES, INC. 828-8100
2009 CENTRAL STREET
STOUGHTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02072
September 21, 1979
Salem Housing Authority
27 Charter Street
Salem, Mass. 01970
Salem Redevelopment Authority
1 Salem Green
Salem, Mass. 01970
In response to your invitation for a Proposal to develop Parcel
R-lA at the corner of St. Peter Street and Bridge Street in
Salem, we are pleased to submit the following proposal:
1 . SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Site, landscaping and schematic plans are attached.
The Architects have recognized the master planning for the
Heritage Plaza Urban Renewal by tieing into the pedestrian
walks, by reinforcing the street pattern, and by recalling
the architectural character of Salem.
2. ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST
a. Housing for the Elderly 1, 730,000.
b. Site improvements (private) 60,000.
c. Public Improvemen ts 15, 000.
d. Private Housing �-2 (990,000.
Total Estimated Cost $ 2,790, 000.
344-0330 828-8100
KEITH PROPERTIES, INC.
2009 CENTRAL STREET
STOUGHTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02072
September 21, 1979
Salem / Parcel R-lA
Page 2
3 . ESTIMATED b1ARKET VALUE OF PRIVATE HOUSING
$ 1, 190, 000.
4. ESTIMATED SCHEDULE
0 Developer Designation Date
+ 1.5 months Schematic plans approved.
+ 3 months Preliminary plans approved.
+ 4 months Permits Obtained.
+ 7 months Design Development plans approved.
+ 9 months Final plans approved.
+ 10 months Construction Bids (Public Housing) opened.
+ 11 months Ground Breaking
+ 25 months Occupancy
5 . PERMITS
Comprehensive Permit (Elderly Housing) .
Necessary Zoning Permits and Variances to allow Residential
Use.
Building Permits.
344-0330 KEITH PROPERTIES, INC. 828-8100
2009 CENTRAL STREET
STOUGHTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02072
September 21, 1979
Salem / Parcel R-lA
Page 3
6. REAL ESTATE RESALE PRICE TO SALEM HOUSING AUTHORITY
$ 35,000.
7. ESTIMATED TAX RETUIU
Private Housing $ 42, 000 per year
IMPACT
Private housing will contribute few children to school system.
Within the property lines, the Salem Housing Authority will
maintain its drive, parking and walks and the private housing
will also maintain its own exterior spaces. The City will be
f responsible for maintaining thestreets (existing) on 3 sides
of the parcel.
S. THE DEVELOPMENT TEAM
DEVELOPER: KEITH PROPERTIES, INC.
2009 Central Street
Stoughton, Mass. 02072
ARCHITECT: BEACON ARCHITECTURAL ASSOCIATES
8 Beacon Street
Boston, Mass. 02108
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: DOUGLAS B. FOOTIT & ASSOCIATES
565 Boylston Street
Boston, Mass. 02116
Resumes are attached.
344-0330 828-8100
KEITH PROPERTIES, INC.
2009 CENTRAL STREET
STOUGHTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02072
September 21, 1979
Salem / Parcel R-lA
Page 4
9 . FINANCIAL COMMITMENT
We have a sound and successful record of financing
approximately $4,000, 000 in public and private
construction annually.
Consequently we anticipate no difficulty in obtaining
sound financial backing for this development.
Very truly yours,
KEITH PROPERTIES, INC.
by,
John W. Kei�h
PARCEL RC-2
This firm would welcome the opportunity to develope this parcel,
should it become available, for private housing in accordance
with the urban Design criteria.
344-0330 KEITH PROPERTIES, INC. 828-8100
2009 CENTRAL STREET
STOUGHTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02072
RESUME
KEITH PROPERTIES, INC. , owned and managed by John W. Keith, has
its offices at 2009 Central Street, Stoughton, Massachusetts.
The firm presently manages and maintains 622 apartments in
eastern Massachusetts.
On the staff are accountants, real estate brokers, property
managers and administrative personnel.
In addition to an extensive background in private and
condominium housing -construction, KEITH PROPERTIES, INC.
recently constructed a 112 unit elderly housing complex
in West Stoughton and is now constructing 56 units of
MRFA housing in canton.
In 1978, KEITH PROPERTIES, INC. and PEABODY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
of Braintree formed an affiliate - KEITH-BANCROFT ASSOCIATES.
After a public competition, KEITH-BANCROFT ASSOCIATES was
selected as Developer for a 40-unit HUD Turnkey Elderly Housing
Project in Stoughton. BEACON ARCHITECTURAL ASSOCIATES is the
Architect for the development which will break ground in
October.
KEITH PROPERTIES, INC. has an excellent track record in
construction and management of both private and public
housing.
BEACON ARCHITECTURAE ASSOCIATES
8 BEACON STREET - BOSTON. 'MASSACHUSETTS 02108
TMIMPRONE:
SERVICES +
BEACON ARCHITECTURAL ASSOCIATES was established in 1963
for the general practice of architecture and planning.
Through our staff, consultants and specialists we offer
a comprehensive range of coordinated professional
services designed to meet the needs of each individual
client, including
+ CONSULTATION
+ PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT
+ INVESTIGATIVE AND FEASIBILITY REPORTS
+ DESIGN AND PRESENTATION DRAWINGS
.+ CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS
+ ADMINISTRATION AND INSPECTION OF CONSTRUCTION
+ MASTER PLANN32TG
+ LAND AND SITE PLANNING
+ COST ESTIMATING AND ANALYSIS
+ CODE RESEARCH
+ CIVIL AND SANITARY ENGINEERING
+ MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING
+ STRUCTURAL DESIGN AND INVESTIGATION
+ ARCHITECTURAL ACOUSTICS AND NOISE CONTROL
+ FOOD SERVICE PLANNING
+ ECOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING
+ INTERIOR DESIGN, FURNISHINGS AND COLOR COORDINATION
+ ARCHITECTURAL MODELS
+ GRAPHIC DESIGN
EXPERIENCE +
The members of the firm, have been responsible for
originating designs, preparing contract drawings
and specifications, and for inspecting and
administering the construction of a wide variety
of private and public projects including the
following types :
+ HOUSING DEVELOPMENTS
+ APARTMENT BUILDINGS AND SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES
+ CHURCH 13UILDINGS AND RELIGIOUS FACILITIES
+ OFFICE, B.TaM AND COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS
+ SCHOOL, LIBRARY AND MUNICIPAL BUILDINGS
+ MANUFACTURING AND INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES
The firm is particularly experienced in the
RENOVATION, REHABILITATION and RESTOPATION
of existing buildings and in the research,
analysis, design and specification of materials
and systems appropriate to the concept, budget
and economic maintenance of such projects..
AWARDS +
+ GOVERNOR' S CITATION
' outstanding Design in Elderly Housing"
Commonwealth of Massachusetts - 1965
+ CITATION
Massachusetts Department of Community Affairs
84 unit - Rousing for the Elderly Competition
Dracut, Massachusetts 1974
PRINCIPALS +
+ WILLIAM D. ADAMS
Education: Cushing Academy
Cornell University B.ARCH.
Military Service : U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Member: American Institute of Architects
Boston Society of Architects
Mass. State Association of Architects
Society of Architectural Historians
interfaith Forum on Religion,
Art and Architecture
Registration: N.C.A.R.B. Certificate
Massachusetts
New Hampshire
Virginia
Michigan
+ RICHARD H. PAINTER
Education: Fork Union Military Academy
Virginia Polytechnic institute
Mass. Institute of Technology B.ARCR.
Milit ary Service: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Member : Construction Specification s institute, Inc.
Boston Chapter of Specification Writers
Citations: Certificate of Merit and Appreciation
The Construction Specifications Institute
Special Service Award
The Boston Chapter of Specification Writers
Continued Distinguished Service Award
The Boston Chapter of Specification Writers
First Design Prize - Medical Clinic
Tile Council of America
3
PRINCIPALS +
+ THOMAS G. TIFFANY
Education: Carnegie Institute of Technology -. B.ARCH.
Military Service: U.S. Navy
Member: American Institute of Architects
Boston Society of Architects
Mass. State Association of Architects
Registration: Massachusetts
ASSOCIATES +
+ THOMAS P. MCCLEAM
Education: Boston English High School
Boston Architectural Center
Military Service: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Memhera Faculty
Boston ,Architectural Center
Registration: Massachusetts
+ ROBERT A. STANSELL
Education: Lawrence Academy
Syracuse University
Boston Architectural Center
4
Douglas B. Footit & Associates
Landscape Architecture and Site Planning
39 Shore Road Winchester, M- as5achusetts 01890 ( 617) 729 - 6450
a brief description
The office of Douglas B. Footit & Associates was organized in
Septenber, 1976 in Winchester, Yassachusetts. Douglas B. Footit
was formrly associated with the firm of Shurcliff, Ylerrill &
Footit of Boston frcxn 1950 to 1968, and a partner in the fi2n
f= 1968 to 1976. Mr. Footit was responsible for a wide variety
of projectsincluding industrial and cmuercial, educational,
playground, parks, housing, hospitals, subdivisions, shopping
centers, and carrpu5 planning.
Professional landscape architects are involved in the arrange-
r.)ent and developnent of land and the structures and aTenities to
be placed on it. Careful consideration is given to all ecological
and environmntal features of a site such as topography, sun,
wind, views and all existing natural features before the site
planning process is begun. In order to be successful, a solution
to landscape design problem nust be structurally sound, econondcal-
ly feasible, functional and aesthetically pleasing.
Landscape architects are trained in a wide variety of areas, from
construction techniques to horitulture. When specialized expertise
is required (i.e. irrigation, site lighting, etc.) , the landscape
architect will consult with a variety of professionals including
architects, engineers, arborists, etc. , to provide the best solu-
tion to a problezn. in this nanner the landscape architect becaTes
a coordinator who oversees the project to assure the best possible
product.
Douglas B. Footit & Associates offers carplete site planning and
land cape services. our services include land planning and evalua-
tion; site selection; cost estination; preparation of scheaTiatic
PI
.ans, contract docLments, and specifications for grading� utilities,
locations of structures and related 'facilities, planting; and super-
vision of construction.
Douglas B. Footit & Associates
Landscape Architecture and Site Planning
39 Shore Road Winchester, Massachusetts 01890 (617) 729 - 644-50
personnel background
Douglas B. Footit
Graduate - University of Massacbusetts - 1950 - B.S. Landscape Architecture.
Member American Society of Landscape Architects—
Registered Landscape Architect - Massachusetts, Connecticut.
Equivalent of three years general construction
One year employment with large landscape nursery.
Employed by Shurcliff & Shurcliff, Shurcliff and Merrill 1951 1968.
Partner in Firm of Shurcliff, Merrill & Footit 1968 to September 1976.
Sole Proprietor Firm of Douglas B. Footit & Associates September 1976 to date.
Philip E. Pryor
Graduate - Cornell University 1974 B. S. Landscape Architecture.
Associate Member - American Society of Landscape Arc hitects.
Employed by Shurcliff, Merrill & Footit 1974 - September 1976.
Associate in Firm of Douglas B. Footit & Associates September 1976 to present.
MQ
rl
lif
2-IV
k ,ME
ill.,
77 5
-;r--, all
IS
iip if i t
"';IM A
' I h
E-1
tr:3 Td,
jJ111
Ull
Stern-Tise Development Co., Inc.
100 CENTRE STREET
BROOKLINE, MASSACHUSETTS 02146
(617) 731-5905
STERN-TISE SALEM GROUP, iNc.
SALEM HOUSING AUTHORITY SALEM REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
PROPOSAL
Jeffrey A. Stern
Stephen E. Tise
Matthew W. Stern
Roger W. Stern
Stern-Tise Development Co., Inc.
100 CENTRE STREET
BROOKLINE, MASSACHUSETTS 02146
(617) 731-5905
21 September, 1979
Mr. Christopher G. Olney
Salem Housing Authority
Salem Redevelopment Authority
27 Charter Street
Salem, Massachusetts 01970
Re: Redevelopment Parcels and Developer Designation
Dear Mr. Olney:
This letter is to introduce ourselves to you and the board members of the
Redevelopment Authority and Housing Authority. Our company name is Stern-
Tise Salem Group, Inc. We have completed the development of some townhouse
condominiums in Brookline, Mass. These un4ts have three and three and one
half bedrooms. They are three stories high and all have ammenities such as
fireplaces, yards, greenhouse projections, wood flooring, etc.
Our backgrounds are as follows : We have been in the building business for
the past 25 years and we have a demonstrated record of success. Two of the
four principals , Matthew W. Stern and Roger W. Stern have recently been in-
volved in the construction of two high rise developments , namely;
100 Centre Plaza, 100 Centre Street, Brookline, Mass.
MHFA #7o-8-N HUD #023-35-111
1550 Beacon Plaza, 1550 Beacon Street, Brookline, Mass.
MHFA #70-90-N HUD #023-16-NI
The building at 100 Centre Plaza has 214 units and the building at 1550 Plaza
contains 180 units and 8 Medical Offices. The principals are currently in the
last stage of Rent-up at the latest building, Known as;
120 Centre Court , 120 Centre Street, Brookine, Mass.
HUD #023-35121 Sec. 8 #MA06-HO58-008
GNMA Commitment #901330
120 Centre Court has 125 units , of the 125 units, there are 17, 2 bedroom
townhouses , 3, 2 bedroom flats and the remainder are one bedroom and zero
bedroom units. The building at 120 Centre Court has been finished on schedule
and all that remains to be done is some residual landscaping in the spring.
In the category of design excellence, the principals have been the recipients
of numerous awards , along with the architect who designed 100 Centre Plaza and
1550 Beacon Plaza. The awards have ranged from systems building awards to an
award from the Boston Society of Architects for design excellence in an urban
environment.
The developers have sufficient financial capacity to enable them to carry out
M.r. Christopher G. Olney/ 21 September , 1979/ Page 2
the proposed project.
The partners have been involved either.,�.-ointly or individually in the following
conventionally financed projects:
191-207 Park Drive, Boston. 9 Buildings
Corner of Charles and Revere Streets , Boston. I Building
20-32 Marshall Street, Brookline. 3 Buildings
137 Sewall Avenue, Brookline, I Building
131 Sewall Avenue, Brookline. I Building,
There have been no defaults in any of the conventionally financed building that
the partners have constructed.
The. thrid member of the team is Jeffery A. Stern. He has been engaged in property
menagement full time for the past 13 months and previously on a part time basis
for the past 5 years. He is also a licensed Real Estate Broker in the State
of Massachusetts. He received his degree, a B.S. in Real Estate and Urban De-
velopment, from Syracuse University. He has continued his education a� Harvard
University by taking an evening course at the Graduate School of Design. The
course was entitled, "Legal problems in Construction."
The fourth member of the developer team is Stephen E. Tise , R.A. Before e5tab-
lishing his own architectural firm, Stephen Tise was employed by STull Associates ,
Inc. as Design Director and New Business Director, Development. He received
his certificate from the Boston Architectural Center and attended the Rhode
Island School of Design. His awards include;
I
The Royal Barry Wills Design Award
Master Builders Awards , BAC
BSA Design Award
Boston Society of Architects Traveling Scholarship, 1968,
European Town Planning
Loeb Fellowship, 1976, Harvard University
Our firm is comprised of the following principals:
Jeffrey A. Stern , President
Stephen E. Tise, Vice President
Matthew W. Stern, Treasurer
Roger W. Stern, Clerk
As you are aware, Stern-Tise Salem Group, Inc. is currently finishing construction
on 8 Townhouse Condominiums in Downtown Salem, at the Corner of Ash and Federal
Streets . We currently hold the option on Parcel RC-2 and we intend to exercise
that option late this fall . We intend to costruct 14-18 townhouse units along
Federal Street and an additional 8-12 units along the West side of the The North
Greenway, at a later date.
The -.am will be organized along very specific lines. Stephen Tise, R.A. will
have entire responsibility for the design of the 667 elderly housing, as well
as the market housing. Jeffery A. Stern shall be responsible for securing all
needed permits and approvals for the market housing. Further he will be avail -
able for additional support on the elderly housing project, should that be nec-
essary.
The development team has a full range of complimentary services available, such
Mr. Christopher G. Olney/ 21 September , 1979/ Page 3
legal , financial , consulting, accounting, and any other professional that may
be needed at any time during the development process .
The development team will separate the two phases of this project. In other
words , we will sever the market housing from the elderly housing. Page 3
Section g of the RFP sets out the ''Simultaneous criterion" of the 2 types of
housing and we do not propose to follow that criterion for the following reasons :
I The elderly housing must be built first , to act as a screen for the mar-
ket rate housing. The present esthetic perception that one would have,
standing in the I iving room of market rate housI66;,'i�ds�i�shield the
view of the jail and Parker Brothers Warehouse. Ae site, as is , is
unacceptable for market housing. Once the elderly housing is up , a
totally different environment will be created and market housing can
then proceed in a completely different environment, and;
2) The elderly housing portion of the project will be publically bid ,
using Union Tradesmen. The market housing will be constructed by
non-Union Tradesmen. This is necessary because of the different wage
scales . The market rate housing becomes financiAlly non feasible when
union labor is used.
3) When projects which are this close in physical proximityipcannot utilize
labor from different sources. The potential for conflict is too great.
Therefore, the elderly housing must be allowed to substantially complete,
and most the tradesmen gone, before the market housing with its own
labor source gets underway. This is perhaps the most critical aspect
of our proposal .
We are pleased to give the following references:
Mr. John A. Dwinell
BayBank Harvard Trust Co.
P.O. Box 300
Cambridge, Mass. 02138
Massachusetts Housi;ng Finance Agency
Old City Hall 45 School Street
Boston, Mass. 02108 .
Malmart Mortgage Company , Inc.
III Washington Street
Brookline, Mass . 02146
The Department 'of Housing and Urban Development
Boston Area Office
15 New Chardon Street
Boston , Mass . 02114
The State Street Bank and Trust Company
225 Franklin Street
Boston, Mass.
ATTN: Josiah P. Huntoon, Vice President
The First National Bank of Boston
100 Federal Street
Boston, Mass.
ATTN: Donald Miller , Vice President
Mr. Christopher G. Olney/ 21 September, 1979/ Page 4
Our proposal design has been worked out by Stephen E. Tise , R.A. Mr .Tise
was responsible for the Master Development Plan that came out of Stull Associates ,
AIA. , for Salem's redevelopment proposal . The plan that Mondev Co. , was pro-
posing was worked out by Mr. Tise and ti�en Mondev took that master plan and
formulated their own plans from that. Mr. Tise is the one person, outside of
the members of the Redevelopment Authority that is the most familiar with Salem's
plan.
Alsu,, it should be pointed out that several years ago, when Salem was receiving
it 's award from the Boston Society of Architects , sitting at the same table was�
Mr . Matthew and Roger Stern accepting their award for 3550 Beacon Plaza..
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST FOR THE PROJECT:
The estimated cost of construction for the elderly houisng can be expected to
be the maximum figure allowed by DCA. To expect otherwise would %e folly,
The per-unit-construction cost allowed by DCA is exceptionally . low and therefore
the entire budget can be expected to be used. Any savings would be expected
to be pushed back into the building to upgrade.
The cost of site improvements is diffi,c ult to determine at this, early dat e.
However the scope of public improvements which we would like to see is as
follows;
1) A connecting walkway from parcel RC-lA to parcel R-1 , to finali,ze the
pedestrian link to the downtown area. Some retaining walls on the North
side of the site. A small decked area adjacent to the elderly but1ding
would be ideal and some increased landscaptng, highly desirable. We
have seen on Federal Street wh,at some trees can do for the entire
streetscape.
The cost of the private housing is difficult to pin down at this date, but the
ballpark figure of $650,000.00 - $750,000.00 would be a fair representatilon of
estimated construction cost.
ESTIMATED SCHEDULE FOR TOTAL DEVELOPMENT:
The elderly portion of the development will be in strict- accordance with DCAks
timetable. As you are aware, they determine at what speed things wM happen,
and therefore we will meet or exceed every date and deadline, to insure that
the project moves ahead as swiftly as possible. To give exact dates for
accomplishing permits , etc is impossible at this po int.. Experience has shown
that it is hard to estimate DRB, SRA, SHA, City Council Board of Appeals,
engineering, Building-Dept. , Fire Dept. and electrical dept.. approval time.
The only thing we can guarantee, is that the project will proceed with maximum
speed and minimal delay.
PERMITS , VARIANCES, ETC. :
The permits , variances etc needed to proceed to completion are as follows. (not
,in any particular order)
M,r. Christopher G. Olney/ 21 September, 1979/ Page 5
1) Zoning Board of Appeals fo- setbacks , parkinq variance, side yard , etc.
2) SRA Approval
3) DRB Approval
4) Probable City Council Approval
5) City Engineer
6) Building Dept.
7) Fire Dept.
8) City Electrician
9) SHA Approval
10) DCA Approval
11) Financial Institution Approval
RESALE PRICE OF REAL ESTATE:
The resale price of real estate containing public housing to the SHA will be
maximum allowed by DCA. (Refer to Estimated Construction Cost) . In order .to
insure, the best possible buildiing all savings should be returned to the build-
Ing to upgrade whereever possible.
ESTIMATED TAX RETURN:
The elderly portion will be tax exempt, since it will be owned by a public
agency. Therefore the return will be zero, unless for some reason the Authority
makes an "in lieu of" payment.
The private portion of the project is estimated to return between $18,000.00 to
$$25,000.00 a year in property taxes , at todays rate, The impact on Municipal
Services will be fairly minimal . The elderly portion will have no school child-
ren and will use police, fire, emergency medical services. Water and sewer will
also be used. The capacities of these services are adequate in our opinion,
although exact routing of water and sewer will have to be worked out with the
City Engineer. When the North Greenway was drawn, we believe the utilities
for a project of the magnitude were allowed for . Trash would be expected to
be removed by a private collection complany.
The market rate housing will use less municipal services , but is expected to
add some children to the school system. Present experience says that not
every unit will have children residing in it.
FINANCIAL COMMITMENT FOR CONVENTIONAL HbusING:
Our evidence of Financial commitment for the conventional housing is that our
bank is currently backing the oiri�inbl 8 .unIts we are building and our dis-
cussions with them are that they stand willing to finance our next series of
units when we are ready.
M�,-. '! Christopher G. Olney/ 21 September, 1979/ Page 6
MISCELLANEOUS :
Present plans call for 12 conventional housing units on the site and for the
elderly housing to meet or exceed all physical requirements by local authorities
and DCA. The exception is the parking requirements . We feel that the elderly
requirement of 1/3 space per unit , and the conventional housing requirement
of I ' spaces per unit are excessive. We would propose .25 spaces per unit for
2
the elderly hous1ng and 1 space per unit for the market housing .
Our present experiences in elderly houisng located close to an urban area prove
that even .20 spaces per unit are adequate. (Specific figures available upon
request.) Further our Townhouse experiences are showing that 1-1 . 25 spaces
are adequate. One of the major attractions of living in an urban area is the
decreased dependence upon the a utomob! I e and this is ref I ected in the I i festy I es
of persons availing themselves of housing such as the type which we specialize
in providing elderly and townhouse. We take the word townhouse at its literal
meaning, and take great pride in the fact that we build in downtown areas .
Peirce Pierce & Kramer/Stephen Tise & Associates, Inc.
116 Newbury Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02116 617 731-1110 267-4245
September 21, 1979
The Salem. Housing Authority
The Salem Redevelopment Authority
27 Charter Street
Salem, Massachusetts 01970
Attn: 14r. Christopher Olney
Project Administrator
We are pleased to present our qualifications as architects for tile proposed
elderly housing to be built in Salem as part of the DCA 667 Program, Round #3.
This brochure supplements our earlier letter of interest sent to the Salem
housing Authority in January, 1979.
The joint venture of Peirce, Pierce & Kramer/Stephen Tise & Associates, Inc.
is an architectural and planning resource well qualified to provide compre-
hensive and imaginative design services for elderly housing. The firm's ex-
perience includes all facets of project control, fast track design and con-
struction techniques, system applications for low and high rise developments,
as well as the rehabilitation and adaptive re-use of existing structures.
Project responsibilities assumed by the prIncipals have included new and re-
habilitated housing in a variety of Massachusetts communities. Our primary
aim is to provide developers , corimunity organizations, local housing author-
ities, and systems producers with a resource devoted to high quality and re-
sponsive design. Through our experience in housing management and research,
we are able to bridge the gap between short term design/construction concerns
and long term issues involving energy conservation, building maintenance and
tenant satisfaction. Housing developments designed by the principals have re-
ceived design awards from the Department of Housing and Urban Development, The
New York Concrete Industry Board, House and Home Magazine and The Boston Society
of Architects.
',los-t recent'
ly, our firm has been selected by the Watertown Housing Authority
and Department of Community Affairs, as the architects for Watertown. 's pro-os-
p
ea elderly housing under Round ',.*'2 of DCA's 667 Program. Site analysis and selec-
ti--n is Currently underway with the anticipation of a construction start during
In the pages -which follow, we have summarized projects which may have relevance
Go your elderly program in Salem. These have been divided into categories for
71ew Construction and Rehabilitation.
We will appreciate the opportunity to meet with Salem Housirg Authority and The
Redevelopment Authority to learn more about your programs and to document how we
can best serve then. Please let us know if we can orovide more information at
this time.
Sincerely,
PEIRCE, PIERCE & MUERJ
STEPHEN TIS-E ASSOC US, INC.
(J
Stephen E. Tise//"4—
SETAm
Nz,
\O-N
1, x
Z 1,
4t
elf,
I-z
----- ----- --I At
Rk
[ROBEIRMEN CDIRK7HAN Moo
SETTS 019A
,621 TOPSFIELD ROAD IPSWICH, - MASSACHU
11,1 :PLEASANT , STREET MARBLEHEAD, .: MASSACHUSETTS 01945 ' � -
Ken
F M.
--- T r
k5o
s�;
�—1 ii� 1, "iw j, 11 1, t�
A"Y i
iw
if
t, 'M
44,
Yll"yiltlll`,��,
ev
Tt
GRAZADO V I E LLECO ARCHITECTS 115 PLEASANJT STREETIMARBLEHEAD MA 01945 617-631-4949
T,
DESIGN CONCEPT,
"T! ......
"d 1 n_-prop6s
ng-.,o r',, des
IT developi -s r
% a
�,J
were o . c n nueT'��the' fabric.-of:.-,th�,-�'pxi,sting-,,h 'in
t ' o ti ,
ous
ian h'
1.-,,;,,ipedestr �NaYS �an use�!t e�_mid 'and,,, low.-'.ris6 'housi
Contain Ta ,maj or.,�space Th
elderly, housing�,_is_us
e
qT�_ _..1 1 1- . . - -
hold',T-the" eas�c
edg6T-1_of '4the park��k.icas�ting,:.'th 1
e east possible
PPP',Sp ace .. Grade,' separation' i s-
�,shawdow .i
use
- .,-.wit in tj I A ine'. be�L
hi ii �; major,, s ace, as ai ,su e�
p
c Ive
...... IT 4-
tween the�,,elderly`: and market
separation,
—ai.Lows T-cne-.pri f
0
Pro
t 1116,
rations of�, - ,tw6:,:usbs
A
5 ......
"Me ......
majorspace�_ds�designed,,ds' i;- T
T� li,,
r;T1 �J,
']::Eor_��tLe`._'6'lderl T'� T ......
'Cess
iy.,, is,, fxom!,� e, existing� pe eStrian
"TT"
e e v a t fo n a ow i n g t h
Irect:. entry,,.in oTft e�,T;tow6i, �Atho'
T1,� ut-;�ilevel'z`,�!`:�.
Jje, . ........ fX,
5
opi,',`L hrough'-t he.,. park"'e st ab-1 i shes'4
changes.�.�T�,'The` grade dr
Id ;�_�.. ... .
S I
the"
e ..i entity h ' b '
eac :'parcel - hade:�trees;-, enches�,.�.J `
i.Vii L_L ng
s�6'ps��,'and� ramp's 'modulate Otn
y 6pace. o -c3: t
a interest".,iiiiiz-The Tturn,: arEo"un T :
TT T
f :4it 6t" alily-,,�,1 ute' rrj'a'_'J�,`J i"`�'
e� site ,','a-' d
t ih
S
T i:.c,,. 'on�,s
,traf
t ��Pet e r tre_eV'T.T"�m��This. ari�-angement��a-llows,,5��s'��e'��iting-����,,!�,
t ' 3TiTtV-,,be
�acti
T�1-,.1
T cess_�'Ilia's�T1,b'e',e_r_i_,;,ke, _
he TTtown
;'ITT
oUses
Ti
en e
h Ite- rj,�the 1 fi garage s-!i f r6m.7 Ash-..'S t reet',T�ofi 1� %��S e rv7i 66"�
lor, ------
tower'.,J 7'-f'
Is�, ron
riveway�:,tftat� par�.-,�'r--,'
'A. IT
X
�la�riy-�,�parki-ng.��and* vlsltor-'t" '
e e_C i�'e a i I-CE
parking
IT
g
g,�'a'n
ng -t
d to
The
IT
IT
4J
�T,
GRAZADO VELLECO ARCHITECTS 115 PLEASANT STREET MARBLEHEAD MA 01945 617-631-49491
�si� te from, St . !Peter Street * but� is not -int6nded' to
go, through�.to �Ash Street,.- A�ccessibillt
7, t o Ash Street f rom
st.� , t
Pet,6r. Street . i.s intended o, be f6r�.ser,vice -vehicles,4only,�:,.�� -� �,"
t'-,-s'uggest -t h at"i"
;and 'the -round plane' dev' elopment�is- intended
this area,.is" for,.!pedestrian . use -only'. :: i`A'ccessibility" t6 'the
,,- ,,Boudreau Property ,will be maintained. :
4,i
Vi
, . ,..The:.north "south '; axis% of
-the.1tower allows:�,Sunlight,,-,:Into -'all.:,."�
"the' dwelling units .-at '.part..��Of''.the _day,..'_1: 'The,_'
some �OlDen:,�
or,.,courtyard enjoys�.,the_, best .possible 'or t ti round'
a, ion year
e 0 even' 2-1/2 story -townhouses include --livi
di
ng,-.room,
room' .',ki' ''chen two�,bedr_ooms ,,, -two.- f,ull baths , Oil
t 0
ar �garage��4,
under.,`�'l'a"undr'y 'ai'e'a_"�-and, a.-,� oft
e townhouses
are. altbox",',,'_.in..',.'s' h ape�7�rec
eirchitecture'.t,;J`�' The s e' i,,wbod,"�'Trame_ structure o
'h-1L-1-f'i level�,LsysteM which works .:we il� with
'y
veneer�
,�,,,--':-.�The '.ext
A,V 7
b 6 a r d s i a 1
ng �
ei�seven�,,.story�b -1
of�-elderly�',-h re 11.
e 1 r.;,L,r e a e
height�-,apj _
p a
saiist�Church,"X,,
2'�,4:,s'
ccess^.'�tort
es rlan.;3way�
-�g,r
on ies--�.ente re d'-'f r'.om--"-thb�Te 1 e'V
..................
I 1_U bun ge�ti.',are as'.,,f or fresident§iS�1;1��'_ i,
V
e-�isvp acecL,,on�� 7he,--�s(�Venth���fl66',
e v a o r-z5,�,l 'b b
ble"t h'- d- d
_ si-ned tto�,b6",tbtall
-y,, accessi an icappe persons, sug-��,,
appe-ct.'��ain_
p e d p 6 r
��.........
"A"
I%NSI,i�'��,� �q�
lln �V.
I""N Z4,
W
L I
or.�tR
GRAZADO V I ELLECO ARCHITECTS 115 PLEASANT STREET MARBLEHEAD MA 01.945 617-631-4949
i-THE DEVELOPMENT-3EAM
The development team,wi 11. include the follow'
ing Members :
R bertsen�Corintlfian Ltd ` Ipswich !. Massachusett'
-La
Thorva-ld uri sen .i,
Edward RobOrts' �iI, :._:_
In
S
Grazado .'Velleco �Archit'e`c'is`,'�' Marblehead
Massachusett
Joseph F��` Grazado
r,T
ames A,,- .
j Velleco r
The above"'membe rs
are. now� developing "Nath anie 1 s ',Landing. CondoL_"�
,.,off historic Derby . Street 'Salem, .,Ilassachus' etts . , These
units will b"
e ready for- occupancy ,iin .october of t hi
s.-, year
,Robertsen-�Cor'
inthi'an 'Ltd. owner manage":ri f
o more than 100
�.L; 4
properties...in-i;the Northshore and. �Grazado _ e 'Archi-
-rent a -V li'e' co
t e ct s designer �and' bul-lder:,of '�S' ingle 'and'. 1 f
mu ti- ami,l� ;,h8uses,'�
i n Mass ac�use t t s an a ii�South6inNew' t'Hampsh i re, , l6ok�,,f o
1with,-,
e n t h u s i a s m t o part icip*at ing'.�IIC,Salem .'again .
'AA
--j
Ou r -c omm
t f .S
it ment to 'tnei�e forts.,of ithe,.,Ci'ty ',o a em are.:'evi'dent..;�,
..........
f
'i n il IN a t h an i 0'-'l s L'a
ndingi �Odr'�success ul '.e orts.ilin.,,..securing :.vari��L�_,�ii�.
ances , desIgnin financi,ng,�
'91 -,�reinforces�,�this
COMMitl� ',
ss
-:The �effedt of Nath i
ani h
I wi -wit out�,�'ia.doubt`�im-'
t h
--."'--prove e,,�,,e,ast ',end�,,of.-,DerbyL'4', en -'which-
qnvironm t
new�.owners.and��'Inei
ighboi:
--an evesore,�in an-, b
I% ..with�,,enthu
siasmi, y.-our.'
i-::,upporrVg;ima
U
A 4
devel a
obb-s this.,' project`-is� an, ex ension-,--o .,-our -p anst't "�_Con_ 1'1.'��?��i.�-_,:;:�j--,z,
ol�
't . k �our nei-hborho od,�- the-ji0r.�hsh6r6"
and
.w I-
units'�.we" i'are"prb
�the :ideal-..step
a
pi-o-ject -,Is%the,;fo, g i'ca' i
extensio'n.-� of,�ou
ii, 7t,
GRAZADO VELLECO ARCHITECTS 115 PLEASANT STREET MARBLEHEAD MA 01945 617-631-4949
-4
GRAZADO ..VELLECO ARCHITECTS"
Grazado Velleco.Architects is a Nort sho
architectural .firm
office arblehead.�`-
s in , M The principals have�aidiversifi_ed
background :from. urban,.design to
interiors .., The experience Of, -
ho singiis . exte
'the f.i rm,',1 n nsivei.'ln' the';
U and
privatei',,',, public
sector'. -We-'are. familiar with .Department, of Community. Affairs
Cha er 667 -Housing,"Program ,and 'have, wo"n" .two honorab
e men
tiola desicin awards.. from Department of 'c6mmunity -Affairs while
4 ;1" '.
senior -assoc la S
tull,..Associates , _Inc.. of Bost 0
on . ur
des 1 gn.- f or 'e' partment 0 Communit
u�., f"i
inthrop 'and Drac y
Z,
Af f ai "'ompeti ionlwere.ii;,cited �,fori,'T,theirexcellence�
Lrs,izc
"IP - 'T
rz, 711� _
esign','
d and ',the,'dw6l-ling tn i t,"'-ar
rangements, n-par
i-, J-i 11 li�
our.' su
bmission�,`fdntt e ,Dracut,�competitf ion�ji was, used
licati6n �d e V e 1 o' pe d b the
�f,,-commun,i�t'Y:'%i-Affa'irs,"
titled - Low Rise"iliHousing or
d W 11 A
Graza o,.,, e eco,- rchitectswas-, a so a,�, ina ist��on- the�- D '
lll.�_11 � ?, ," .I..I- - anvers ,
ousing," uthori ty.,'s,-,'re cent - request�':f or,�,.,'archite'ctural'�servi ces-
It:
C
m
'3 2 b?
a. -,-un i t
..........
J%�ir do m t'own h o u s e Ea_st`:';fHaver-,�i.
o C I C
"tit "T&
f , , _,-j' i�l�j, Ql`�'�
ched__
for-A-c
uled- ft'S c
,comp 6ted _1 S t il
,-a4,communi.
eWtv-�Hlamp s h 1 re,:,,, or�,:T ounif�'
ain-,� ome,"E
S t
00 _,�JoUhge I creEimr
i-,an,,,ah dbox d.,'b ut o
i�� r ,A
_iV,1,
4,q i
y
MZ'"I
e�,, contract �to,'Provide.,.�land���.,,,,,-.:��i-
4 il��
It
r
vices ,on�, a�;, arge6 -R
s s
c use S_i
stru6tion 7start
it ii�
7 f i",'
re
ic
in pa
epar
I
er
e-14
ut
............
...... 44,
..........
N.
GR,AZAD0 VELLECO ARCHITECTS .115 PLEASANT STREET MARBLEHEAD MA 01945617-631-4949
IT-
Grazado' Velleco -Architects being
_a , lOCal..architectural .fi
rm
can T)rovide';the Salem .Housing .%Auth t
Or' Y avai ability and
6 " .. ....d
Cessibiliiy'�to .:the. de.sign �.�team..LI "'A., project su h is -re-
c -Pas 'th '
2 N�
'quires.-a dialogue 1�between "th
d
e., user;, �the 'authority' an -the�
W,
COMMi t. . . irm
architect-'and ,we No , such an L�arrangement .- T Is, f '
n
beli6ves,'�in bei g f available to ga'ther,�'intormat ion from the
ding and would s
users of Ithe :buil
uigest:'a' series. of N.
munity meetings"..take p ace' to' gather'; design an p r�-6 g a6 N-I
d
N,
put -from Salem'.s,.'se'nior' :` NN IT
citi
�Z'
NI, TT�I
IN,
;r7
TI
T T'�,,'I.-
4T
�TI
-4, 1. IT _v I
fI N', IN 1�
a I� IT,
N'T.
�I. , �I,i---,, :-.'�,4,
I L,N' 'N',
IN "1-1 . ,
N_ IN
N� 1I...
IT
4,
L WN
'TZ",
TTT'�,
T�
"I IN
I T'N,NII"J N�
T.
I IT' I�T �N I,
N NI V.51,1-1 AN
T�..........
v�
N
T,�
14 TINT, 1",
;,ZT, A
N
I..... NN_
'T
N,,- I
IN
o,
TI
T"N"
-T. N`11.�1111-11--
IN I
VYN`J N
19.1
V,
I I IN— I
WIN
1Ij
N'
Q,
IT-", .�T�,,g��
),'MAN
T�, 1�a........
�gNN,
IN-
IN,
�,`Tr
�TJ
IT
W11 I
Z
-3,
NA"',
IF 1,
CI
IT
IN IN P
N; T
IN'
IN �Iift -N i NT
T N.T� IN, -N, I
T;T
I
4
'Nv:A..�4':
L�IT,
2'
IT
�1 41
q, ITT,
�T
................................... 4
—T),
24, TI-
. .........
IN
C
E
GRAZADO VELLEC.0 ARCHITECTS 115 PLEASANT STREET MARBLEHEAD MA 01945 67-r,31-4949
E4.
SCHEDULES,,
-CONSTRUCTION. AND COSTS
T', E
_ ,-The7. estimate'd ,developm6ht'/construc�
tion , sc-hedule ca
-agreement is ,rea:ched� between .,Robert
a
Corinthian" Ltd�., and '11 pa� rticipating, autho'r' ities -:T L'It "S'
',-understood' that�the.-,projects will: rogress simu
p Itaneously .
IT,
NG' SCHEDULE
.��, 667 HOUSI
lu months..,-
- Schematic.,Design DCA Phase��Two J
T.
Rev'
gency. lew _-2 weeks
-174; m6nt�.s DCA P�'
ign- Developmen hase--Three
Des t "I '1, -.11
, ,� L� A, "', , _E� ,
41.�.,_'Agency Review T�l
TT wee s T,
Contra�ct,�Docuffient
s 4_ lj`,�-DCA, Ph ase.�,Four- V��
Agency Re v 1 ew,
ih
mon
1,7"E
mon _F-
thl
e,� ive,
T," "7
W, T ,��
e v 1 ew, B i ds mo n t h�,,
-,',--,Constructi6n�'
i4". ""months
DCA 'Ph
TL��`2� `E� ` IT
_d-1 c.o s
b u"'r"" e"'x p-e i i e n ce.E,sliows'-_�.w i t h�l.,e f c i 6 rit de s i"'
9 an
'T' "E�"j� T
budgetl�,;ofl
Z" .. illi61
4..
..........
cl s a; b u d ge_ t'�'��' Tfi,
that-4,,wor e, 43 2M! gross,.�s ar(§,-;,q ee
TZ
t t
s ruc ion-�,*produ(:�es_�I'a ,.$4 6&.',.per.'..��squa:re':
00
t
T,
0 t I etz-including sit.e,;E!, evelb Tmen tEl'-
1.11p,
ot�,���st.ructural'�-sys,ti�his��sh"ow-�,,that,,�a:,�.,ma
E.T, .......
b e a
8'!E,�',,precas T��ICOnC
t e m,,,�,w 1 t h'- T
MI rete,�,.,p ank,�A
�Tz
desi �,��,.�.-4desicLes�,,Deing,��,economi,c- 'P_,th" T, I'T`it
on E e
own ouses,
n or_�.ot e
a/ h x"
-'T ,
E�, V
4kE,
dsign-'tl�an'd�Z�'
strud`tu`ra'C1"',sys em,,-,propbse'd�';ji's',,.�.no',�lim-i�, t *""'
-d
as
as
_T'
;t l Kill a
V4 .......
-systems `andT.biA-1 din 6' t j 'I
of�-Eother`� " ' ' ' f "' " "'
Mt 1
ma. e r i a s
"T, v--E,
d e s-fg-h k,
as� th
�K
GRAZADO VELLECO ARCHITECTS 115 PLEASANT STREET MARBLEHEAD FVfA 01945 617-631-4949
MARKET RATE HOU ING--
S,
V
Des
Schem tic ign ,,
a 1 month
Salem Redevelo
pment Authority, Review. month
Design Development 7
I month"e
m m
Salem Redevelop 'entIAuthbrity Review 1. onth,
a
Contract Documents� j 2. months
T
C onst' n
ructio 6 months
Actual .start .!of constructi 'n--wil 1 be before or�nq Ja er� tha,n
the construction :s ta r
t of,'-the. 6, 67-, housing construction start-
The private:.-marke -we! intend ,to seek js the '-m
single ]6r arii
couple"', �'.a,, minimum-,of w,hich,wou have ,,children
- anticipating that"."th& sec6nd' bedro be 'used ��f stud
orn y or
or, a
d h Th
e is, uni �� size,��seems,��.appi,��ri'�te,-� '�nd. '
'bl'
a-compati e -neigh— ,
-The' mar et, rate i-va ue for, �the
bor" with-the' 66V
two bedroom .�townhou_ue_ s 'will be-�in,-the d
W -mo erate ,price'
range_� of
a, ......-,
$751*000 per,.cond6`m_ lnlu_ m� unit'-.�:"`This.'.'ma�k
f
et"is- not being ill-1 ,
.4 Z 1-1, ,- �, I �Il� ' ' I �_ r_ I - 11
IV
�L 4�7"V
i t
n -the:. downtown',
ed,.,i salem,�area-how ana--:we�'.be.li'ev'e,`,,
r 1, 13
7",
x,
Pc
------ J�14
A
11J. .",..........
-g
�4;z n,
.4.J�
g
GRAZADO VELLECO.ARCHITECTS 115 PLEASANTSTREET MARBLEHEAD MA 01945617-631'4949-
TAX RETURN AND IMPACT ON SERVICES _
i't
The,estimated tax �returh e"City: f r'om th' ma�
to- th . e rket: rate '.
developed portion of the R-lA s te' is obvious with the, con-' "'T
s1truction 'of ele.ven' - ,,two bedroo'm: townhouses . It, is� �,saf e to
1
say that. -th6l taxes ,per unit will
probably",be, between' $2 , 200 and :,'.�
$2 ,500 per year� The. ii�D a6 t'
on . ser.vices will be minimal' our
sign of
de two bedroom
units on an .urban :site�,ds c ear y: a .state�
�,., .-. mentlto th6 � fact :that few- sch
ool :
age,:children will impact the
rtr_�. �.school,� system., Sewer, water� ,an'd".,Oi'h' 'er'�uil'li.ties - as well as �f ire'
'police 'rote-
p t `b
will not'. e !,noticeably affected' .1-
J,
. ...........
.:the R-1A site ' to b'e,' de'
�The.,�,S,,ale-m..�,Housing.�.Atitliorit��, port:-L"on" �� v-
eloped wi I
1 probablya'�dmpact"thO -utilitY-'.,system mor6��th�jn. the
L t%:,r' a"Tit' 'h
mark- e., units ou t is is ,min*or-, '66nsiderinig "th
e � excellent,�,, j_
c' at
ion, or� a facility' such as .this'.`,,.T6o,-of ten- senior 'cit '
izen
h
parated��from 'the �downtown. area.
e� in'� o r,
U
design have ' tribd *to intergrate� the ;,two-�'R-1A project
an ' rorirhent,-..v,hich.�"C-O-M'P'I,im' "t
envi
en s- each ,,development_z,as�'�
area.-
01i
V
. ..... .....
"U 5k A�V. _no
3-p
'7�
7 �,,7
v,
Zpl�
Z 4�.,
P,
W
"'A
GRAZADO VELLECO ARCHITECTS 115 PLEASANT STREETIVIARBLEHEAD MA 0194561-7-631-4949
FINANCIAL �COMMITMENT`
Essex bank is . oul r 'financial par tn er in other development pro-
jects and.L we havel, discussed. this- project with them and , are
pleased with their desire .to participate . The enclosed let-�
ter .from* Es.sex Bank ,will serve as' e�vidence as to the inter—
estlof .the banking community ,to 7work with Rob ertsen-Corinthi an ,'
Ltd� Permanent ;.fin an I c I ing comm itm ents 11 from . .S t alem 'F.i I ve f or,
prospective .buyers have -been establis.hed p�rior;t'�
0- construction'
'be jects and we anticipa e similar" arrange I ments
starts o n -6�t 11 pro
t
P n the redevelopment: parcell.-- ' Th6,,-deVelopmentteam� move
will
. ,,-..,quickly -to Purcha,sej�e market rate development parce.I 'o I r. er.,i
t er into a . mutual
seriousness of OUrK.-
intent
vz"
'Q'
4�'
-�zl
F
'41
I
�q.
essexba, m
ONE ESSEX CENTER DRIVE,PEABODY,MASSACHUSETTS 01960
TELEPHONE 617 532-2500 598-2000
September 19, 1979
Salem Redevelopment Authori-
UY
One Salem Green
Salem,. IjLk 01970
e
R Parcel RAI Cr. Bridge, Street
and St. Peter Street- .Salem, DAA.
j
Gentlemen;
L
It is our understanding that a customer of this Bank, Robertsen-Cor"
in hian
Ltd.., has or will be submitting a proposal. relative to the �development of : : i�
the subject parcel. - Their proposal..I,involves 'coristruction of 11/two bedroom
Condominium units at azproject cost of approximately $600,000 �and, ass umin
Andividualunits will sell for $69,,500. to $79,500 the "sell-'out" will .
approximate $825iOoo.,,
This letter will assure you.that, given the :�elationshiD we have had,-with
this company thus far,.,.we would entertain.,an application for_ inancing th
.,- oroposed,,development of,'�he subject, parcel -If they are named-d
incerel_y
Z� �7
---- -- 'Roy 'iKirkland'
resiCLent,
r* P
A�
?J�
J
A�.
,J_
...jr,
t
t' It
zi
RE
K ad
zZ
GRAZADO VELLECO ARCHITECTS 115 PLEASANT STREETIMARBLEHEAD MA 01945 617-631-4949
ZONING AND SUB DIVISION DESCRIPTION
The zoning analysis contained on the- following table III for
each parcel indicates that the zoning requirements are met
with the exceptions of front , rear and side yards . The de-
velopers will seek variances for the violations based on a *
site plan that meets the spirit of the Salem Redevelopment
' Authority ' s Urban Design Criteria.
The present R-1-A parcel is divided, into ,two parcels -with
deeded. rights- of. way, across each parcel to accommodate site.
planning goals . : ' Th,e servi ce area of the 667 projec t t-11 sacce ss-
ible by, using the. driveway of ihe , market rate parcel. that par-
.1 al I lels Bridge. S..treet .z. Similarly ,." the pedestrian . acce.ss. :to the
townhouse units is , across the 667,.parceljand adj "ce'
a n t. to the
major open
.space.
The attached sketch 'shows �t he prop,osed su b division .of-:,the
R-lA parcel �'.
Als6�in�icated are .the areas where deeded rights . ,.
of way, are necessary- to* accommodate � the design solut ' The
ion.
' 667 .,site: has '32 ,410:�'
square feet � of�-Iand. . 'Jhe townhouse site.'--'
h'as- ,181 000 . + -.square�'J eet of"i land'L�whi(,h �includes the access.,-drive
--that services the',,elderly 'project �',.�,,,Other- op ions are : available
't'o 'th
handle.', e servicing of',,�the ..larger., sit
6 :b.ut ,,,the developer z
feels sharirig . the !driveway,;'..�curbeuts from ,%he v ly�, r a,
that,: in
- b `61AIn'
ed :roads � car e 1 inate
L
--7
iv
TABLE III
CENTRAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT REGULATIONS'
ELDERLY HOUSING
135-REQUIRED PROVIDED
1 4
-_,,jj�n Lot Area 12 ,000
_Ksa . ft . ) 32 , 410
Min. Lot Area per Dwelling
Unit (sq . ft . ) 500 540
Mir . Lot Width ( ft , ) 100
Max. Lot Covera-e by all . 200 +
Buildings 45 22 . 7%
Min. Depth of Front Yard ( ft . ) 15 41 9s t _n (2 )
Min. Width of Side Yard (ft-. ) 30 41 '. 1,@ 47 ' -01� &
! . .� 1 @ 25 ' -011
0 41 '
Max. Height of ,Bldgs . . (ft . ) �.7 . stories
Max. Height of , Bldgs . (no,. , o
..... ....
stories) "� 2 7 stories�
Max. Height ofFences or
Walls 6 ��7-0
Boundary 6
._(ft .
lMin. ,:Distance between Bldgs . Distance- equal, to
if 'More Than One on a 'Lot
height oftaller'.".:
/A
building _N
-,!,tax. , Length, of ,, Individuai,
250:1 0"
Structures"� ft
Max..,'-Dwelling. Units per, Bldg
N
e Stories or Less �A:
of. Thre 24
Max. Dwelling Units
per Bid-
"120
M ' Th 60 ' �
o f .Moore an, Three Stories
t io
loor, Area-,.Rai (ratio- of total-�, ,v-
'75 gz,
of�:,b d�,S _ 3. 0 .--1
See�!Note
'S
line-on -St - Peter �
z:,,- Set b'ack,.,.fro�C�yard,-.,'on St" Pe-er-:Street. is' .7" _x, 81 -:2811--
x��2/3 7
io.t ,with 43, 200 - sq-'�,'Jt .', of building ='�� 75 - 1
TABLE III
CENTRAL DEVELOPMENT DTSTRICT ,REGULATIONS
MAR=T RATE TOWNHOUSES
B5-REQtIRED PROVIDED
Min. Lot Area (sq . ft . ) 12 ,000 18 ,006,
Min . Lot Area per Dwelling
Unit (sq . ft . � 500 1 ,636
Min._.Lot Width ( ft . ) 100 NIA
Max. Lot Coverage by all 45
Buildings 40 . 7%
Min. Depth of Front Yard ( ft . ) 15 5 ' -01' _(.1
Min . Width of Side Yard ( ft . ) 30 N/A
Min . Depth of Rear Yard .( ft . ) 30 9 ' -0 (2 )
Max. Height of Bld-s . ( ft . )
130
'lax.. B
b1c[gs . . (no . of
stories ) 12 21,
Stories
Max. Height of Fences or,
6 ' -011
Boundary Walls �ft . ) _ 6
Min . Distance between Bldgs . Distance equal to ,
if More Than.. One On a Lot height of taller.! 8 _Ot,
building.
11ax. Length of Individual
Structures (ft . 'l @ 100 , -0
d
2 501 an
@ '80 '
-0"
max. DwellingrUnits per Bldg
@ 6 D U. ,
of . Three Stories or Less
"24 and
5 �D.U,
Max. Dwelling Units per,_ Bldg
of more Than Three 'St o r-i es 2 0 N/A;
-Floor Area .Ratio (ratio ofr total
1 J-
t total
oor
0 : 1
S
1 t area)`-". e e:'Nb t e 3
0 .....
t�iisi, 8 ,
1 Takeh' ' t
a worst.,-,con i ion , average on � Ash tree
(2 Taken at worst_:condition , .,rear yards at major:s a
p ce. are
-VISUa
ly ,greater
( 3) 1 626-� -886 (basement� and loft taken at
sq. f t ._/D.U, x l 1 17
1/2. area)
11.- t�' L
J
7Z
Q
�7 t
VZ
V Ix
'7
q) ILMD
LO
T"
HIP
t�"�z'
IT 1�1
IT
�ln
t
it
NO
it
-------------
1�KZ
e
'11�iiAll!l
Ell;
T Tilf
Elm
it.
lit
'i Trzf
k' X/1 -S
L tit .
MCI
MT
I-41 ,
J7