TAC TEMPS (002) DRB SIGN 'PERMIT 1993
Tac Temps
One Salem Green —_ - —
�S
5aiem =
Redevelopment
Authority
�E!EPHONE 744.6900
@�'� �� ONE SgLEh1 CREEK. SgLE`A. MASSACHUSETTS 0i970 744-4580
SRA FEE SCHEDULE
CAPITALIZATION LOAN
Loan Application Fee: 75 . 00
Loan Origination Fee: 1 point (payable
at closing)
FACADE EASEMENTS
Donation of Facade Easement 150 . 00
DESIGN REVIEW
Signs and Canopies 25 . 00
Design Review of Project
with a total construction
budget less than $10, 000 25. 00
Design Review of Project
with a total construction
budget greater than $10 , 000
but less than $50 , 000 50. 00
Design Review of Project
with a construction budget
greater than $50, 000 but
less than $100, 000 150 . 00
Design Review of Project
with a total construction
budget greater than $100, 000
but less than $500 , 000 250 . 00
Design Review of Project
with a construction budget
greater than $500, 000 500.00
jm\srafee
l
SALEM REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
SIGN APPLICATION
Date of Application: 3�b�R3
Applicant Name: -Tac- 'k 35l -Awy
'Phone #
Location of Building: SON. Gtw-w
Number Street
Owner of Building: (���� Iti ( 5 I Ove, (;pfcm &,cm ()Swca S
Sign Designer : S!yt E!-ms5 &,eAi 1�1�t �Ial 43{6
Name ofindividual c mpany
Sign Type (Check more than one if necessary)
Wall/Facade Temporary
Protecting Banner
Window V_ Mechanical
Other CeJti wwu� _�x,sk
Sign Illumination
Internal Bare Bulb
Indirect None /
Other
Submission Requirements: All items must be received two ( 2) days
prior to meeting.
(Please check )
1. Detailed scale plan of sign ✓ I --- -
✓
2 . Color samples
3 . Letter type/style
4 . Method of attachment
5. Method of lighting NIA
6. Location of sign on building: Drawing Polaroid v�
7 . Fee a5•
Approval Denied:
Approval Recommended: y/a)�c/�
Date Approved:
EX/DRBSIGNS
AW
Salem =
Redevelopment
Authority / AL TELEPHONE 7446900
J/ ONE SALEM GREEN. `-AIEM, AIA SSACHUSETiS 01970 7444580
SIGN REVIEW PROCEDURE WITHIN THE URBAN RENEWAL AREA
1 . Applicant completes Design Review Board sign application.
2. Design Review Board (DRB) reviews submission and makes a
recommendation to the Salem Redevelopment Authority ( SRA) .
Applicant or sign maker should attend DRB meeting.
3 . SRA reviews submission for final approval.
4 . Following SRA approval , applicant obtains sign bond and will
receive an approved Sign Permit from the City Planner .
5 . Applicant takes approved Sign Permit to the Building
Department for final approval .
DESIGN PHILOSOPHY - October 1982
(According to the Salem Redevelopment Authority Urban Renewal Plan)
The existence of the Design Review Board is mandated by the
provisions of the Urban Renewal Plan. It ' s function is to review
and prepare appropriate recommendations for reference to the Salem
Redevelopment Authority "for concurrence and approval" . The basis
for the DRB ' s review is derived from the stated goals of the Urban
Renewal Plan and are essentially related to preservation of
structures of historic and architectural value and the restoration
of neighborhood quality, economic viability and functional
capacity. The emphasis is on exterior environmental quality that
abides by "local conditions with particular regard to the
historical importance of the Old Town Hall and Derby Square areas" .
There are seven principal zones in the Heritage Plaza East Urban
Renewal areas, each with its own special characteristics which
ought to be respected and addressed in the course of each review.
1 . The Derby Square/Front Street area: Federal style, formal
setting of town hall; Front Street meandering; pedestrian
scale
2 . Museum Area: Intermediate scale; style juxtaposition
3 . Essex Street Mall: Commercial ; style juxtaposition;
Intermediate scale; pedestrian
4 . North Area residential: Contemporary-picturesque; landmark
focal ; pedestrian, presently insular
5. Washington Street : Mixed scale; vehicular
6. New Derby Street: Factory lofts
7 . Charter Street : Dominated by burial ground, scattered
historic buildings, small scale
Other areas are transitional and reflect overlapping
characteristics.
Because of the chicken and egg relationship between preservation of
architectural and historic values and the restoration of
neighborhood quality on the one hand, and economic viability and
functional capacity on the other , it is the responsibility of the
DRB to deal directly with this relationship to address the trade-
offs in their design reviews and recommendations.
EX/DESIGN
�. � .
� a � �l
4
T
"'> L� l ��
,'.
z �;
f �_
;� , �
i
I r ill �: '�' ���''.
p �� N
� �y ' � h. Y: ���
saa ., f
xY
�� N
��1
�!�H
�� L ��A
_ � `���r
E
a
r
. �,
--I
Ri
r �,
p
—� � 6. Q
$ �.
5 . � �
� � s
off--� � i
� ^�
� �
4 _
i,
e v....l�r..•iJtwSY�f.11'��klii'11CGitltiLYt,a:i.tiSr�:SL�.d�.;7a�.. �r. a.,G ..,...<,a.. :.
_ ` °'gyp : ,.
: i
O
s
� 1
ro' m
r
JOST4LLATLOR) DCVA(L
TAC
TEMP-S
IVJto PaASo,SJR`I C��.�iwt,
J
.1;
J^
I �
I
'Ptal= a .Llq oaat_� pt'aprl=tery Intor=et1Y •� _. -- --•' --• --- -'i
end tlYiga eonc=pG ona L proal y or unit= - 1
_ crepplo=. Ina. It L t=1 t Y .
nq OSYYtd Ca you .. -
Sor yoK Ycla=iv= Y=_ It ry mt W eovioo -
- or ab.ova to enyoY oue it your ot,00isatloo
Ylthont th= OrprY= K1ttY par Ion pt - -
Onitad 4Tapel., ]:ne_ .. •fir