23 ORCHARD STREET - BUILDING INSPECTION r
[23 ORCHARD` STREET -
Plans must be filed and approved by the Inspector before a permit will be granted.
No. City of Salem t wara_ -
IS PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE
HISTORIC DISTRICT? Yes No s
IF SIDING, HAS ELECTRICAL Home Phone
PERMIT BEEN OBTAINED? Yes No
APPLICATION Bus. Phone # j.-z - 6l
FOR,
PERMIT TO ROOF, EROOF OR INSTALL SIDING
Salem,Mass.,
TO THE INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS:
The undersigned herebv ap lies for a permit to mld according to the following specifica['ons,
���
Owner's name and address rqv" "I"Mv`� LP�)r2A• �� (5—&*--A ,:fl Sim VqC, 6Iq-�o
Architect's name --
Mechanic's name and address } w } �.V}'� � �S
Location of building,No 3 (1;P (1-h /-�a
What is the purpose of building? aw ce A91U14
Material of building? W n}ad Asbestos? (3
If a dwelling,for how many families'_ a1e:) (P--
Will
Will the building cont n to the requirements of the law?
Estimated cost rtltprsLic.
Signature of applicant
RE
� MARKS PEI A Y UNDER THE Y e1 /11A'
/RC2 nr@��-'
eaL o U
No.,20-9 Ward
APPLICATION FOR
PERMIT TO ROOF
REROOF OR INSTALL SIDING
Location a3 �rC%Q✓GP
PERMIT GRANTED
ate- Z� 19��
Approved
Building Insp4 r
70 cI'd�
L�
' ,J '
uta Tug g 'j'' alem�
�} I �LL.IS II1
n H,y Z4 t 36 111 176
CITY CL�st;'S OFFICE
SALEM> MASS.
bYRUAM F. ABBOTT _ APRIL 27, 1976.
JOS E?H R DOYLE -
JOHN M.GRAY.SR.
ARTHUR E LABRECQU- DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RONALD AND LORRAINE. DIONNE FOR A VARIANCE
JANE
T.DONALD
satsFROM THE SIDE YARD REQUIREMENTS,4BEGAN
DoNALD E. UIREMENTS, IN ORDER TO BUILD AN ADDITION AT THE
VAERYP.TANCH REAR OF THE HOUSE LOCATED AT 23 .ORCHARD ,STREET (R-2 DISTRICT) .
Hearing on this petition was held on April 27, 1976 with Board Members John M. Gray,
Sr., Chairman, Arthur LaBrecque, Jane T. Lundregan and Associate Member Donald E„ Eames
present. Notices were duly mailed to abutters and others in accordance with Massa-
chusetts General Laws, Chapter 808.
Mr. Dionne represented himself before the Board. They wish to demolish the existing
porch, which measures 8 feet by 12 feet, in order to add a new 14 feet by 15 feet
family room, with fireplace. They presently have a non-conforming side yard of 3 feet.
and the new additon would extend back with the same side line of 3 feet. There is
sufficient backyard density.
The Board voted unanimously to grant the variance requested. The Board found that
there was very sufficient back yard and that the denial of this variance would cause
hardship to the petitioner, which was unnecessary. The Board found that the variance
could be granted.without any detriment to the surrounding neighborhood.
VARIANCE GRANTED HEREIN SHALL NOT TAKE EFFECT UNTIL A COPY OF THE DECISION BEARING THE
CERTIFICATION OF THE CITY CLERK THAT TWENTY DAYS HAVE ELAPSED AND NO APPEAL HAS BEEN
FILED, OR THAT IF SUCH AN APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED IT HAS BEEN DISMISSED OR DENIED AS
RECORDED IN THE SOUTH ESSEX REGISTRY OF DEEDS AND INDEXED IN THE GRANTOR INDEX MENDER
THE NAME OF THE 01 MIR OF RECORD, OR RECORDED AND NOTED ON THE OWNER'S CERTIFICATE
OF TITLE. A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE
CITY CLERK.
SALEM BOARD OF APPEAL
BY
(11e'cretary 4