5 ORANGE STREET - BUILDING INSPECTION
Plans must be filed and approved by the Inspector before a permit will be granted.
No. --Z�0 -�3 City of Salem Ward
IS PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE
HISTORIC DISTRICT? Yes Noi� s
IF SIDING, HAS ELECTRICAL Home Phone # 7�P ����
PERMIT BEEN OBTAINED? Yes_No_
APPLICATION Bus. Phone #
FOR
PERMIT TO ROOF, REROOF OR INST SIDING
Salem,Mass.,
TO THE INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS:
The undersigned herebv applies for permit to build acc rding to the following specifications:
Owner's name and address cmc—� s9-f ti
Architect's name
Mechanic's name and address
Location of building,No. (-
What is the purpose of building? _
Material of building? �a i�e� fl�relti— AsbestOS?
If a dwelling,for how many families'--
Will
amilies^_Will the building conform to the requirements o e law? 5
Estimaied cost Contr tors Li No.
Signature of applicant
MARKS
SIGNED UNDER THE
PENALTY OF PERJURY.
No. Yo? C� Ward
APPLICATION FOR
PERMIT TO ROOF
REROOF OR INSTALL SIDING
Location 5 PJ c d hcn a 7�
PERMIT GRANTED
19 93
V
Approved
/0Go„( ilding Ins eat r
q
N.c,niM,l'Vi -
JOSEPH F. COLLINS # 3 LEONARD F. FEMINO
ASSISTANT CITY SOLICITOR •s — �? ASSISTANT CITY SOLICITOR
93 WASHINGTON STREET 93 WASHINGTON STREET
AND CITY OF SALEM - MASSACHUSETTS AND
22 SO. MAIN STREET MICHAEL E. O'BRIEN ONE SCHOOL STREET
TOPSFIELD, MA 01983 CITY SOLICITOR BEVERLY, MA 01915
745-4311 93 WASHINGTON STREET 745-4311
887-6401 AND 921-1990
PLEASE REPLY TO 22 SO. MAIN STREET 81 WASHINGTON STREET P//LEASE REPLY TO ONE SCHOOL STREET
SALEM, 1970
745-4311
-4 43111
744-3363
PLEASE REPLY TO 81 WASHINGTON STREET
December 22 , 1989 r, o
� n �
� ti -
or-
rn U
William H. Munroe, Building Inspector C o _
City of Salem m< un
One Salem Green rn "3 rn
Salem, Massachusetts 01970 �
m -e
Cn m'
Re: t5 Orange Street, Salem c.o
_,--
Dear Mr. Munroe:
Please be advised I have examined utility records and
census records relative to the above entitled real estate
and it is my opinion that it was a lawful three-family prior
to adoption of the Zoning Ordinance on August 27, 1965 . In
addition, the records of the Assessor' s Office indicate it
is currently assessed as a three-family. Accordingly, it
is my opinion it should be afforded the protection of Section
VIII (E. ) of the aforementioned ordinance relative to
nonconforming uses and, thus, it' s current use as a
three-family is permissible.
V7y-`t my your ,
ae�i
ty Solicitor
MEO/jp