173 OCEAN AVENUE WEST - BUILDING INSPECTION was f'
That o O r
ttlPm, ��sttchu�..tz�
'� •y ;Y�,., . J �ulllit �r��rFr#g ���ttr#menf
Richard T. McIntosh
One Salem Green March 5,1982
zap-nzl�
Lionel Pelletier
173 Ocean Avenue Re: Lot #3
Salem,Ma 01970 Brooks Street
Dear Mr. Pelletier:
Please be aware of the fact that you have not recorded your
allowed House Lot with the Registry of Deeds. Please do so
immediately.
Failure to properly record your permitted lots will result
in the revocation of your building permits and no issuance of
an Occupancy Permit.
Please contact this Department if you have any questions.
Very truly yours
Richard T. McIntosh
RTM:mo's Inspector of Buildings
cc:Planning Dept.
Engineer' s Dept.
Assessor' s Dept.
Certified Mail #0224607
f t ('gitg of ttlPm, tt�sttcl�usPtt$.;
A.
� nxrD APR QH "6)
w«� C17y
- C " u
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF LIONEL PELLETIER FOR VARIANCM4 t�"MgSsuFi-ICE
�1 3_OCEAN AVENUE ` (R-2)
A hearing on this petition was held April 15, 1987 with the following Board
Members present: James Hacker, Chairman; Messrs. , Bencal, Fleming, Luzinski and
Strout. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the
hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with
Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting Variances from the requirements
of SEction VI, Table 1 of the Zoning Ordinance relative to lot area, area per
dwelling unit and lot width to allow parcel to be divided into two lots, A & B.
Also requesting a Variance from minimum depth of front yard for Lot A. A single
family dwelling to be constructed on Lot B. Property is located in an R-2 zone.
The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding of the
Board that:
a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect
the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally
affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district;
b. literal enforcement of the provisions-of the Zoning Ordinance would in-
volve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to petitioner;
c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the
hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
1 . There was not opposition;
2. Lots to be divided will be about the same size and in keeping with
the neighborhood.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the
hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject but
do not affect the district generally;
2. Literal enforcement of the Ordinance would involve substantial hardship
to the petitioner;
3. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF LIONEL PELLETIER FOR A VARIANCE
AT 173 OCEAN AVENUE, SALEM
page two
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the
Variances requested, subject to the following conditions:
1 . A building permit be obtained prior to construction;
2. Plans be presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval
prior to the issuance of a Building Permit;
3. Proper street numbering be obtained from the Assessor;
4. A Certificate of Occupancy be obtained.
VARIANCES GRANTED
(Ax,
/times B. Hacker, Chairman
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
APPEAL fROM THIS DECISION- IF ANY. SHALL BE MADE PURSUANT TO SECTION 17 OF THE MASS. Y
APPEAL
F LAWS. IS DECISAMP' BOB' AND SHALL BE FILED WITHIN 20 DAYS AFTER"THE DATE OF FILINGGEN '
OF THIS DECISION IN THE OFFICE OFcT`E CITY SECS N!. 11. THE VAP,IA'1'E Of carCIAL PfR:Al7
PUP.SAN7 TO MASS. CEN.EP.AL LAWS. CHA.T_P ENE•
C.fID DC A.r^^?7.L HSS EEEI; FILED.
GRANTED O IVAS, SHALL NOT TAKE EFFECT UNTIL A COPY OF THEOE-'-' 7. EEL2!:•! IHC C,LRi•
FICATION OF THE CnY CLERK THAT 20 DAYS HAVE ELAPSED IS
AND INDEXED ti!SDER THE NA:d£ OF THE DWNER
OR THAT. IF SUCH AN APPEAL HAS BCEN FlL£. THAi IT HAS DEET: DfS;(ISSEp OR ^E!EIEN
RECORDED IN THE SOUTH ESSEX PEGISTRY OF DEEDS
OF �qgp DR 1S RECORDED AND NOTED. ON THE OWNER'S CERTIFICATE OF TITLE
BppgQ GE APPM
l
CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS CITY OF SALEM. MA
1 BOARD OF APPEAL
CLERK'S OFFICE,
120 WASHINGTON STREET, 3RD FLOOR
/(d SALEM, MA 01970
\ ..•• TEL. (978) 745-9595
Fax (978) 740-9846
STANLEY J. USOVICZ, JR. - 1003 NOV 25 P 2: 38
MAYOR
DECISION OF THE PETITION OF LIONEL PELLETIER REQUESTING A VARIANCE
FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 173 OCEAN AVENUE WEST R-1
A hearing on this petition was held November 19, 2003 with the following Board
Members present: Nina Cohen, Stephen Harris, Nicholas Helides and Bonnie Belier.
Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were
properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts
General Laws Chapter 40A.
The petitioner is requesting a Variance from lot size and lot width to allow a single family
dwelling to be built for the property located at 173 Ocean Avenue West located in an R-1
zone.
The Variances, which have been requested, may be granted upon a finding by this
Board that:
a. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building
or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and
structure involve.
b. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve
substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioners.
C. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and
without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district of the
purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the
hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
1. Attorney Stephen Lovely appeared and represented the petitioner's request to
construct a new single family. Petitioner seeks a variance from lot size and lot
width.
2. The plot plan was presented showing the lot the petitioner would like to build on.
3. There was no opposition to this petition.
t
DECISION OF THE PETITION OF LIONEL PELLETIER REQUESTING A VARIANCE
FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 173 OCEAN AVENUE WEST R-1
page two
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on, the evidence presented at the
hearing, the Zoning Board of Appeal concludes as follows
1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the
District.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve
substantial hardship to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good
and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or
the purpose of the Ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted 4-0 to grant the Variances requested,
subject to the following conditions;
1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and
regulations.
2. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall
be strictly adhered to.
3. All construction shall be done as per plans submitted and approved by the Building
Commissioner.
4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to beginning any construction.
5. A Certificate of Occupancy shall be obtained.
6. Petitioner shall obtain proper street numbering from the City of Salem Assessors"
office and shall display said number so as to be visible from the street.
7. Petitioner is to obtain approval from any City Board or Commission having jurisdiction
including, but not limited to, the Planning Board.
Variance Granted
November 19, 2003
Bonnie elair \
Board of Appeals J
.r
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND
THE CIITY CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the
Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 day
date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to
Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11. The Variance or Special
Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the
certificate of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed,
or that, if such appeal has been filed, that is has been dismissed or denied is
recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the
owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title.
Board of Appeal