27 NORTHEY STREET - BUILDING INSPECTION �„ NORTHEY STRFET_
`;M.y �; %fin'
�..,r_ ,,
�!
E .
Citp of *alem, fda!5!gacbu5ett5
` Public Propertp Mepartment
�3ui[aing department
One 9patem Oreen
(976) 745-9595 (Ext. 36O
Peter Strout
Director of Public Property
Inspector of Buildings a p
Zoning Enforcement Officer k�
October 24, 2001
Mr. Lou Laghetto
Boston Gas Company
River Street
Beverly, Ma. 01915
RE: 27 Northey Street
Dear Lou:
Upon inspection of the above mentioned property gas code violations continue to present
a danger to all occupants of property.
Therefore, under the authority of Massachusetts General Law 142, Section 248 CMR
titled Uniform State Plumbing Code.
I am ordering the gas service at the premises known as 27 Northey Street, Salem,Ma.
terminated.
Sincerely,
John LeClerc
umbing & Gas InspeAztor
>2
cc: Mayors Office
Fire Department
Mr. Jonathan Bent
27 Northey Street
~O 4tLif Of` ~�c�lElll� � �FI$52dC lisQti
x
MEMO: BOARD OF APPEAL
FROM: Planning Board
DATE: October 10, 1978
RE: Request for a variance by Angelo and Janice Pramas,XZr7 North y St ,
to be heard at Board of Appeal Meeting, October 10, 1978.
The Planning Board has carefully reviewed the request and would
urge the Appeal Board to consider the following points in making its
decision.
The Planning Board is not opposed to this request as long as the vacant
portion of the lot is joined to the abutters property in order to ,form a single
lot. We would recommend that where possible the remaining lots resulting
from being divided meet current zoning requirements.
Walter Power. III
Chairman
'By: William. Wheaton _.:,,
� u
Z 14
,�lt}I•! I IL .�. f Ir, �.°.L'3i� �i �S'SG`?. �?5:�� CJ��3sr=7^S1�Y�{`:�-�f.i
SAL
OCTOBER 19, 1978
DECISION ON PETITION SU13WITED By. ANGELO PWIM AND JkNTICE A. PRANLM
CONCERNING PROPERTY LOCATED AT 27 NORMEY STREET (R-2 DISTRICT)
A hearing on this petition was held on October 10, 1978 and continued on October
19, 1978. Notices were sent to abutters and others and duly published in the Salem
Evening News on September 25 and 29, 1978.
The following membors of the Board were present for the hearing: Donald Ezm'es,
Arthur Labrecquc, Douglas flapper and James Boulger. The Cha-irmar appointed John Nutting
as a voting member for this meeting.
Atty. Mark Glovsky represented the Petitioner before the Board. The Petitioner
requc- ts a variance in order to divide his proporty. The Petitioner would retain
6,900 sq. ft. (shown as Lot "A" on the plan) containing a residential structure and sell
the re;!iai.nder (shown as Lot "B") , containing 9,21 } sq. ft, to the abuttcr, General INUlls -
FLM Group. Tire Petitioner has not been able to maintain the vacant land and the cost
to do so would be considerable over a period of time.
Atty. John Seraf-ini, representing General Mills, advised the Board that General
Mills has acquired the City's garage property and will occupy the premises as soon as
they can and that this parcel. would become an integral part of their entire property.
They will maintain the land and clean it up in keeping with the property that they already
The Board voted unanin.ously to approve the variance requested with the restriction
that the property to be: owned by General Wils be maintained and kept in clean condition
by the General Mills Fun Group and that the dividing fence also be maintained.
The Board found that due to the uniqueness of the topogr�'nhy and size of the property,
tine granting of the variance reqttested 'would be in no way de ;'Rental to the surrotutding
ne:i.ghbo:hood and would in no way derogate from the intent of tine Salem Zoning By-lata.
Th : Board found that to deny the petition requested trou';.1 cause hardship to the Petitioner.
ATARI_"INCE GRANTED WIT11 RESTRICTIONS
APPEAL FROM THIS DECISION, IF ANY, SHALL BE MAI)E PUI',,SUANT TO SECTION 17 OF lin DIA.SS. GEN.
LAWS, CfIAPTER 808, AND StLALL. BE TILED W111-11N 20 D'lyS AFEER THE D-VI; OI: FILING OF THIS
PETITIO?, IN TIE OFFICE OF THIS CITY CLERK.
PURSUANT TO MASS. GE-AN. LAWS, 01011-1-R 808, SECTION 11, 'EIE \`AIZTf',\CE OR SPECIAL PER�ffT
GRANTE ) HEREIN, SHALL NOT 'TAKE EFFECT UNTIL A COPY OF THE DECISION, BEARING 11IE CERTIFI-
CATION OF 71I1E CITY CLERK THAT 20 DAYS HAVE ELAPSED ARID NO APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED, OR TIM',
IF 'UCIi AN APPEAL HAS BEENT FILED, 'Il-M' IT 11AS BEEN DISMISSED OR DENIED IS RECORDED IN 111E
5911:11 ESSEX REGISTRY OF DEEDS AND IN11NID LENDER lilt; NAME OF THE UVNER OF RECORD OI: IS
R1:CORDED AND NOTED 0\' 111F OiG!N1 R'S CI:P.TIPICA'Tti OF TITLE.
— - a!ie '1' Ltindiegan � -f-
Secretary