Loading...
217 NORTH STREET - BUILDING INSPECTION 217NORTHSTREET EON1n �y� CERTIFICATE )SSU EO N DATE 1/13/92 CITY OF SALEM SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 BUILDING PERMIT. - a.TEBm„ CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY DATE OCT. 281 19 91 PERMIT NO, 496-91 APPLICANT _ Peter SCancias ADDRESS 217 North ST 0VAUR IND.) (STREETI ICON\R'S LICE-SEI nttx�r.�'� uTrt� q], T �•.T.(. NUMBER OF PERMIT TO NEW !.AaH (A1 STORY — — 'WELLING UNITS TmTw. 1\rPf OF IMRR�iO�V,[yM[Mil N0. IPROPOSED USE) AT (LOCATION) 217 Nora! Street ward 6 ZONING DISTRICT R-4 (MO.) ISTPE[T) BETWEEN AND DROSS STREET) (CROSS STREET, LOT SUBDIVISION LOT 'BLOCK SIZE BUILDING IS -.0 BE FT. WIDE P• FT. LONG BY FT, IN HEIGHT>ND SHALL CONFORM IN CONSTRUCTION i TO TYPE USE GROUP BASEMENT WALLS OR FOUNDATION ITYPEI INSTALLING A NEW HATHROOM REMARKS: I CANE RR PERMIT TO OOMPY 745-9595*EllWwl tI fl AD01>mRl AREA OR Aptly VOLUME C-:BIC SOU[RE FEET ' - - w OWNER Peter NLPW� vlRoV'w o'[Ise�lv![Errxsc'EIe TO BE POSTED ON PREMISES, ADDRESS 217 North St., SaleaAMA SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR CONDITIONS OF CERTIFIY.AM ".b OCT 6 3 is Titg of Salem, Cfttssarhusetis FILE �Svar1 1f �F1PA1 CITYCLEeK.StlFti. X1455. DECISION ON T_HE_PETITION_OF_,PETER & ANASTASIA SCANGAS FOR A VARIANCE FOR 21'7 NORTH STREET_ (R-2) A hearing on this petition was held August 24, 1988 with the following Board Members present: James Fleming, Chairman; Messrs. , Luzinski, Nutting and Associates Dore and LaBrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Law Chapter 40A. Petitioners, owners of the property, represented by their attorney John R. Serafini, Sr. , are requesting a Variance to convert a two family dwelling into a three family dwelling in this R-2 district. The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board that: 1 . special conditions and circumstances exist which expecially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district; 2. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner; 3. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . There is sufficient space to allow the third unit, in fact, construction of the house indicates provisions were made for the eventual addition of a third unit; 2. There is more than adequate parking; 3. A petition was submitted supporting the petitioner's request; 4 . Ward Councillor appeared in favor; 5. There was no opposition On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district generally; • DECISION ON THE PETITION OF PETER, & ANASTASIA SCANGAS FOR A VARIANCE FOR 217 NORTH STREET, SALEM page two 2. Literal enforcement of the Ordinance would work a substantial hardship on the petitioners; 3. The Variances requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the Variance requested, , subject to the following conditions: 1 . Premises remain owner occupied; 2. Five (5) legal, on site parking spaces be maintained; 3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Dept. be adhered to; 4. A Certificate of Occupancy be obtained; 5. A building permit be obtained prior to construction. VARIANCE GRANTED J1 ohn NuttingV Secret8r A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE. CITY CLERK A" ALL BE MADE PURSUANT TO SECTION 17 OF THE %!G `rPEiJ_ FRC`,:, THIS DECISW 4 IF A Y. SH Rqr S. CHAPTER 80S. p,l L SHALL EE FILED WITHIN 20 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF FI LI��S SOI. S:CTION ll. THE VARIANCE OR SPECT, i. Ic c'AU IN THE OFFI E OF THETFp CITY CLERK. 1PTFp c myr THE L Ci- � r -"1 JNiIL A COPY O THE DCCIS'1N E N,,'1 'O GAYS HAVE ELAPSED 'ANO NO APPEAL HAS P.IF S,r LF EOL .. L[.N FILE. THAI IAN DAINDEXEDOURJER ETHE RNAhf SOF iJd� `. �` IY THE. ,JiH ESSE' RE.JCiRY O� nZES. GF REGURG OR IS RECORDED AN J I:D uD ON The OWNER'S CERTIFICATE BOARDLOf APPEAi June 29, 1978 Mr. & Mrs. Peter Scangas 217 North Street Salem, Massachusetts 01970 REs Illegal sign 217 North Street Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Scangast In answer to a complaint received in this Office we investigated the sign recently ins�ttalled at the referenced address. _. . This sign has been installed in violation of City Sign Ordinances in that you failed to obtain a building permit to erect the sign. In accordance with said Ordinance you are hereby given ninety (90) days in which to obtain a permit to bring this sign into compliance with the Ordinance. Very truly yours, JOHN B. POWERS Zoning Enforcement Officer JBP/mlr