161 NORTH STREET - BUILDING INSPECTION 161 NORTH STREET
a.
Certificate No: 568-12 Building Permit No.: 568-12
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
City of Salem
iBuilding Electrical Mechanical Permits
Chis is to Certify that the SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING located at
Dwelling Type
I
161 NORTH STREET in the CITY OF SALEM
- - - ------- ---. ..Y--- -1 ........ - -
Address Town/Cit Name
IS HEREBY GRANTED A PERMANENT CERTIFICATE OF
OCCUPANCY
161 NORTH STREET
This permit is granted in conform ty with the Statutes and ordinances relating thereto, and
expires unless sooner suspended or revoked.
Expiration Date
... -
Issued On: Thu Jun 21,2012
_.. ---- --- -
I GeoTMS®2012 Des Lauriers Municipal Solutions,Inc. --- --- -.--- - ""— --.........
f CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
Sr �
7k 120 WASHINGTON STREET,3m FLOOR
TEL. (978) 745-9595
FAx(978) 740-9846
KINMERLEY DRISCOLL
MAYOR THOMAS ST.PIERRE
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROPERTY/BUILDING CONMSSIONER
November 16 ,2011
Tracy Callahan
161 North Street
Salem Ma. 01970
R.E : Proposed Renovations
Dear Ms. Callahan,
I have reviewed the plans for renovations to the property at 161 North Street. The proposed
renovations are consistent with other homes of that era. i.e bathrooms, kithchens,ceilings and rewiring
of the home. We have worked with your contractor many times and have complete confidence
regarding the workmanship and adherence to codes. We look forward to working with you on this
project..
Sincerely,� 0 �j�C�n (` o2t-c
Thomas St. Pierre
Building Commissioner/Director of Inspectional Services
of �&afem, Aaggarbuattg
Vublic Propertp Department
Nuilbing Department
One&alem &reen
(97S)745-9595 Ext. 3S0
Leo E. Tremblay
Director of Public Property
Inspector of Building
Zoning Enforcement Officer
June 12 , 1998
Mrs . Mita Clark
161 North Street
Salem, Mass . 01970
RE : 161 North Street
Dear Mrs . Clark:
I have enclosed a copy of the structural engineers
report referencing the roof repairs at 161 North Street
for your records . Mr . Al Viselli and I have reviewed this
report and we feel that the report should suffice to
settle this matter .
If you have any questions , please do not hesitate to
contact me at 745-9595 x 383 .
Sincerely,
Kevin G Goggin
Assistant Building Inspector
KGG: scm
cc : Al Viselli
Councillor Hayes , Ward 6
#7078
ROBERT M. RUMPF & ASSOCIATES ,Z� y
New Roof Installation c ROBERT Gs
CONSULTING ENGINEERS 161 North Street RU
PF
SALEM, MASS.01970 M.
101 DERBY STREET v
Salem,Massachusetts 4C, er
No. 6632 a �
508-745-6596 FAX 508-745-6596 �A 01sT 9
4
�'f`TlONAL EN
8/2
Mr.Leo Tremblay
Inspector of Buildings
1 Salem Green
Salem,Massachusetts 01970
Dear Mr.Tremblay,
This is a report on our investigation of the structural conditions resulting from the referenced
installation as described to us by Mr.Nangle the roof contractor.
Our computations show that this work actually adds strength to the existing roof structure and we
therefore find it fully adequate.
We believe that the above together with our previous report should suffice to settle this matter.
Very truly yours,
P I� fit. �.
Robert M. Rumpf,P.E.
Robert M.Rumpf&Associates
c.c. Mr. David A.Nangle
6131
ROBERT M. RUMOF & ASSOCIATE! r
CONSULTING ENGINEERS re00F R! P
ii rs 1
IOI DERBY STREET gale m I Mai. �}�
SALEM,MASS.01270
Setts =S° R:'Mtk
506 7456505 PAX 5 7 s U4i -
�MNAt
ZC
Tthe
li [11 MA ;91632.rd repor! onof the roo thetive wore* rvH1'ch was Performocl,
We under.stanq' that a new roof'cover,',-'9 cons,'stinc' o
2" sfvds laid Over Ahe e,ce:stlrr9 roo F 4 svpportr'noJ
new -she at/trr'o9 r sh%nglrs, was rnseLilled.
We bels tvB thst .th�'s was the ivroPer pros vdvre as oppo .
ted to rerrmoe nq d teplaein9 the vx ,,s ef*r79 rooF,
Such removal, x3ide From dirnir7ishincj the hirtorical ✓a.
Cur of this old r:ssiclence, Could endahcjer the rest of etre
strvcturr by red�'.:tre'bvt<'n9 the new voce loads on 2.t7,c
supports nqq walls j disturbing ehCt r top Plafe-S, it e
also btliv✓V It Zt*elr tHat r7eW un forsPPablpiorob(err7
may be encourTte-•/eL✓ c'rt such an old by<lding .
Wk recommend }rowover thst the Present sfrvctvra/ ca-
p��.'ty of t/-,is ra<5t!' bo invvst.'gated beeo.�sE oL' fhra�da�l
dead load of the nOw rooF cover / ebo✓e° all, because its_s
67'kely that this StrucFvre wts never cee,ginaltj, b✓i'lfto
surf today 's code requirerr7ents •
;rt- would be a se'rnP(r mailer t-a ret"lorce ehrs rooF
t'f �t es Found neeessary .