130 1/2 NORTH STREET - BUILDING INSPECTION k'1:3C i2 k NORi H S T+REET,`i' �
(gitg of "Salem, 'fflttssar4usetts
�Roxrb of '4PV ! An 26 9 40 M 188
Far#
DDCISION ON THE PETITION OF NINA T. BUBA FOR A
VARIANCE AT 130'2 NORTH STREET (B-1) CITYQUAK, 5AIEM. HASS.
A hearing on this petition was held on August 10, 1988 withe the following
Board Members present: James M. Fleming, Chairman; Messrs. Bencal, Luzinski,
Nutting, and Strout. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutter and others,
and notices were properly published in the Salem Evening News in
accordance with the provisions of Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 40A.
The petitioner, the owner of the property, is seeking a Variance frau rear
setbacks requirements to allow for the construction of an addition to the
existing building. The property is located in a B-1 zone.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the
Board that:
a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect
the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally
affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same
district;
b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship, financial or oth.>__-wise, to the
petitioner;
c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from
the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal after careful consideration of the evidence presented
and after viewing the plans makes the following finding of fact:
1. No opposition to the plan was presented at the hearing. The Ward
Councillor and a neighbor expressed their support.
2. The addition to an existing hallway is small, allowing the petitioner
to place her washer and dryer on the first floor level of the
existing building.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at
the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1. The relief requested can be granted without creating a substantial
detriment to the public good and without substantially derogating
from or nullibying the intent or purpose of the Ordinance;
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the ordinance would involve
substantial hardship to the petitioner;
3. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect
the subject property but do not affect this district generally.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF NINA T. BUBA FOR A
VARIANCE AT 13012 NORTH STREET, SALEM
PAGE TWD
Therefore, the Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the Variance
requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction be as per the plans submitted to the Board of Appeals.
2. The petitioner comply with all the requirements of the State Building
Code and the requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative
to Fire Safety.
3. The exterior of the addition be in harmony with the exterior of
of the existing building.
VARIANCE GRANTED
//James M. Fleming, Esq
Chairman, Board of Appeal
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH I'iIE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY C1ERK
APPEAL FROM THIS DECISION, IF ANY. SHALL BE MADE PURSUANT TO SECTION 17 OF THE MA96.
GENERAL LAWS. CHAPTER 808. AND SHALL BE FILED l7'1HIN 20 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF FILING
OF THIS DECISION IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CIER'K,
PUP.SANi T'' MP,SS :!Eidr..",AL FAV,S SHP.PTES SOBSEC I6N IL THE VARIAP:CE OP, FPEOIA.L PFRXIT
f ,AI LN OF THE CP)' 'LEP.: triC; Dn1S H,,,'E SEi: N; APPEAL HAS i--EN E._-D.
CR 1HA1. IF Su' H AN APPEAL HSS BE°p FILE_ Ti1AT li HS BEEN DIS"AISSEU OR 0.`i ICLI IS
RECORDED IN THE SOUTH ESSEX RECi$1RY OF DEEDS A'!D INDEXED UNDER THE NAtLE OF THE OWNER
OF RECORD OR IS RECORDED AND NOTED ON THE OWPiER'S CERTIFICATE OF TITLE.
BOARD OF APPEAL
(1
' 001 (Itiitg of "ittlem, 'ffittssarljusetfs
4'as pnttrd of '�k}rvettl
Ave 16 9 40 AN 188
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF NINA T. BUBA FOR A
VARIANCE AT 130'2 NORTH STREET (B-1) CITY ® €AK, BAIEM. HASS.
A hearing on this petition was held on August 10, 1988 withe the following
Board Members present: James M. Fleming, Chairman; Messrs. Bencal, Luzinski,
Nutting, and Strout. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutter and others,
and notices were properly published in the Salem Evening News in
accordance with the provisions of Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 40A.
The petitioner, the owner of the property, is seeking a Variance from rear
setbacks requirements to allow for the construction of an addition to the
existing building. The property is located in a B-1 zone.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the
Board that:
a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect
the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally
affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same
district,-
b.
istrict;b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship, financial or oth �---wise, to the
petitioner;
c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from
the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal after careful consideration of the evidence presented
and after viewing the plans makes the following finding of fact:
1. No opposition to the plan was presented at the hearing. The Ward
Councillor and a neighbor expressed their support.
2. The addition to an existing hallway is small, allowing the petitioner
to place her washer and dryer on the first floor level of the
existing building.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at
the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1. The relief requested can be granted without creating a substantial
detriment to the public good and without substantially derogating
from or nullibying the intent or purpose of the Ordinance;
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the ordinance would involve
substantial hardship to the petitioner;
3. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect
the subject property but do not affect this district generally.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF NINA T. BUBA FOR A
VARIANCE AT 130; NORTH STREET, SALEM
PAGE TWO
Therefore, the Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the Variance
requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction be as per the plans submitted to the Board of Appeals.
2. The petitioner comply with all the requirements of the State Building
Code and the requirements of the Salam Fire Department relative
to Fire Safety.
3. The exterior of the addition be in harmony with the exterior of
of the existing building.
VARIANCE GRANTED
C 1
'4"� )//
aures M. Flaming, Esq
Chairman, Board of Appeal
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WIT13 THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY C1ERK
APPEAL FROM THIS DECISION, IF ANY. SHALL BE MADE PURSUANT TO SECTION 17 OF THE MA16.
GENERAL LAWS. CHAPTER 805. AND SHALL BE FILED Pr'THIN 20 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF FILING
OF THIS DEC!S!ON IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY Ci ERR.
PUP.SANT T;1 VPSS. CE+r DAL LAV,S CHbI`TER 808. SL GiN 11. THE VADDINCE OR "PECIAL PER',!IT
r it °.,i'r LL �..._ E. L,r;".1 _.
Fii AII:N OF THE CITY ;;LER.; [-Ao G:,7S HAY,' E. F❑ APPEAL HAS cFEil FLED.
i:R THAT. IF SUCH AN APPEAL HAS BEEN FILE. THAT ii HAS BEEN DIS,AISSED OR DLNIED IS
RECORDED IN THE S..--DTH ESSEX RF'D31RY OF DEEDS AND INDEXED UNDER THE NAME OF THE OWNER
OF RECORD OR IS RECORDED AND NOTED ON THE OWER'S CERTIFICATE OF TITLE.
BOARD OF APPEAL
coy
Ctu of �$ttlrm, Attsstttljuse##s
s �Ruxrb of �ppwl
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF NINA T. BUBA FOR A �Il�
VARIANCE AT 130= NORTH STREET (B-1) OITYQUAK 041 FM. MASS.
A hearing on this petition was held on August 10, 1988 withe the following
Board Members present: James M. Fleming, Chairman; Messrs. Bencal, Luzinski,
Nutting, and Strout. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutter and others,
and notices were properly published in the Salem Evening News in
accordance with the provisions of Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 40A.
The petitioner, the owner of the property, is seeking a Variance from rear
setbacks requirements to allow for the construction of an addition to the
existing building. The property is located in a B-1 zone.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the
Board that:
a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect
the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally
affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same
district;
b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship, financial or oth:�--wise, to the
petitioner;
c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from
the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal after careful consideration of the evidence presented
and after viewing the plans makes the following finding of fact:
1. No opposition to the plan was presented at the hearing. The Ward
Councillor and a neighbor expressed their support.
2. The addition to an existing hallway is small, allowing the petitioner
to place her washer and dryer on the first floor level of the
existing building.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at
the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1. The relief requested can be granted without creating a substantial
detriment to the public good and without substantially derogating
from or nullibying the intent or purpose of the Ordinance;
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the ordinance would involve
substantial hardship to the petitioner;
3. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect
the subject property but do not affect this district generally.
J
�t
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF NINA T. BUBA FOR A
VARIANCE AT 1302 NORTH STREET, SALEM
PAGE IUD
Therefore, the Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the variance
requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction be as per the plans submitted to the Board of Appeals.
2. The petitioner ccmply with all the requirements of the State Building
Code and the requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative
to Fire Safety.
3. The exterior of the addition be in harmony with the exterior of
of the existing building.
VARIANCE GRANTED
aures M. Fleming, Esq
Chairman, Board of Appeal
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH PHE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
APPEAL FROM THIS DECISION, IF ANY, SHALL BE MARL PURSUANT TO SECTION 17 OF THE MASS.
GENERAL LAWS. CHAPTER 805. AND SHALL BE FILED %';'THIN 20 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF FILING
OF THIS DECISION IC THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CiER'R,
PURSCNT T^ MCSS OEEi r.TU 1AV,S. CH?.PTER 808_ SF' i6N 11. THE VARIANCE OR SPEr.IAL PFRKIT
LiLAII(:N lF TH :%LEP InSI % Gla HA',T 'Ei: IL: .PP EAL HAS B�Efh F!..ED,
OR THAI. IF SUCH AN APPLAL HAS BE-,, FILE. THAI it HAF. BEEN DIS'.4ISSED OR UEIiIEU I$
RECORDED IN THE S.-.14H ESSEX RECiSTRY OF DEEDS AND INDEXED UNDER THF NAME OF THE OWNER
OF RECORD OR IS RECORDED AND NOTED ON THE OW;d R'S CERTIFICATE OF TITLE.
BOARD OF APPEAL
��\ nt / �il"eIl?'YkY�3, �'.Ac,iaS:I67�i
N Una,
L 4 )
Richard T. McIntosh.
One Salem Green
Salem, 14A 01970
July 21,1981
'Ailton Docktor
Harbor Mall, tipper Level Re: 130 ',orth Street
Lynnway, Lynn, Mass 01901
Dear Mr. Docktor:
The above referenced property is located in a B-I Zoned District,
which allows for a dog grooming business.
I will issued a Certificate of Occupancy -When you have occupied
the premises.
Please be aware that you may not keep animals overnight, that is
not a permitted use.
Very truly yours,
4i
Zoning Enforcement Officer
RTM:mo' s
Ctu of '$ttlem, 'Attssadjuse##s
�Roxrb of �kppvd An 26 9 40 M 18
riu�F
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF NINA T. BUBA FOR A
VARIANCE AT 13012 NORTH STREET (B-1) CITY OORK, 9II EM. MASS.
A hearing on this petition was held on August 10, 1988 withe the following
Board Members present: James M. Fleming, Chairman; Messrs. Bencal, Luzinski,
Nutting, and Strout. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutter and others,
and notices were properly published in the Salem Evening News in
accordance with the provisions of Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 40A.
The petitioner, the owner of the property, is seeking a Variance from rear
setbacks requirements to allow for the construction of an addition to the
existing building. The property is located in a B-1 zone.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the
Board that:
a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect
the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally
affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same
district;
b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship, financial or oth. -*wise, to the
petitioner;
c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from
the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal after careful consideration of the evidence presented
and after viewing the plans makes the following finding of fact:
1. No opposition to the plan was presented at the hearing. The Ward
Councillor and a neighbor expressed their support.
2. The addition to an existing hallway is small, allowing the petitioner
to place her washer and dryer on the first floor level of the
existing building.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at
the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1. The relief requested can be granted without creating a substantial
detriment to the public good and without substantially derogating
from or nullibying the intent or purpose of the Ordinance;
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the ordinance would involve
substantial hardship to the petitioner;
3. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect
the subject property but do not affect this district generally.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF NINA T. BUBA FOR A
VARIANCE AT 1302 NORTH STREET, SALE
PAGE TWU
Therefore, the Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the Variance
requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction be as per the plans subinitted to the Board of Appeals.
2. The petitioner camply with all the requirements of the State Building
Code and the requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative
to Fire Safety.
3. The exterior of the addition be in harmony with the exterior of
of the existing building.
VARIANCE GRANTED
ames M. Fleming, Esq
Chairman, Board of Appeal
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CITRK
APPEAL FROM THIS DECISION. IF ANY. SHALL BE MACE PURSUANT TO SECTION 17 OF THE WA96.
GENERAL LAWS, CHAPTER 808. AND SHALL BE FILED IC'THIN 20 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF FILING
OF THIS DECISION IN THE OMOE OF THE Chf C'.LRB_
PURSf.NT TJ CH':PTER S98. SC I2N Il. THE VARIF.:':Cr OF .'-PEf1AL BERY.IT
F ATI''' CF THE 1LR Incl G.,1S HaLiJ fi. PPEAL HAS °6E:1 Fi_ED.
[)R THAI. IF SU'.H AN APPEAL RS BE-i� FILE. TH.,,,i I': HAS BEEN DISMISSED OR DENIED IS
RECORDED IN THE SC.'UTH ESSEX RECiSRY OF DEEDS A'ID INDEXED UNDER THE NA:J,E OF THE OIVNER
OF RECORD OR IS RECORDED AND NOTED ON THE Ow6ER S CERTIFICATE OF TITLE.
BOARD OF APPEAL