83-85 NORTH STREET - BUILDING INSPECTION �uraeacQ
QD
No. 153L•2
HASTINGS. MN
LOS ANGELES-CHICAGO-LOGAN.OH
MCGREGOR,TX-LOCUST GROVE.GA
U.S.A.
��- ��-
IMPORTANT MESSAGE n
FOR �N� 4"� w1L-'Toczck 'A,.
DATE `� � TIME 11 ' M P.M.
M
OF
PHONE
AREA CODE NUMBER EXTENSION
❑FAX
❑MOBILE
AREA CODE NUMBER TIME TO CALL
TELEPHONED PLEASE CALL
CAME TO SEE.YOU WILL CALL AGAIN �(
WANTS TO SEE YOU >C RUSH �(
RETURNED YOUR CALL WILL FAX TO YOU
MESSAGE
7 LLC PL-
'7j
L U 5%
SIGNED
ONIVERSAL. 48005 MADE IN U.S.A.
l
Pearl of Appral
APR ib .S 39 VH °1Z
CITY CLL,.W6 UFFICE
WILLIAM P. A06OTT DECISION ON PETITION OF WERNER W. ALETTER,S4 M.-WS. -
JAMES H. BOULDER
JOSEPH P. DOYLE WERNER I S AUTO SERVICE TO ERECT AN ADDITION AND TO
JOHN M. GRAY, SR.
ALTER PREMISES AT 83-85 NORTH STREET TO PROVIDE A
ARTRUR `TARECQUE
NCH
EMERY P. TANCH SHOWROOM FOR AUTOMOBILES. E`
EMERY '
J. NORMAN WELCH, JR.
The Inspector of Buildings refused to issue a permit to erect an addition
and alter existing premises at 83-85 North Street as the plan submitted
indicated nonconformity with the setback requirements of the City Zoning
Ordinance.
Petitioner appealed to the Board of Appeals to vary the applicable terms of
the Ordinance , and a hearing was held on this appeal on March 27 , 1972 , pur- ,
suant to notices mailed postpaid to the petitioner, abutters , board members ,
and others , and advertisements were duly published in the Salem Evening News ;
advising of this public hearing.
In addition to Chairman John M. Gray, Sr. , Board Members present at this hear-
ing were Arthur Labrecque , J. Norman Welch, Jr. , and William F. Abbott who
acted as secretary in the absence of Joseph F. Doyle ; also unable to be pres-
ent were Board Member James Boulger and Associate Member Emery Tanch.
Petitioner appeared and explained the plan the same as in the original appeal
on file ; he has an opportunity to increase his business as a distributor for
a new line of automobiles ; without this additional space for showroom and
future service , this would not be possible and would definitely constitute
a hardship; the new showroom addition will be attractive and enhance the sur-
rounding area.
i
No one appeared in opposition.
The Board found as facts that the B-1 zone did divide the parcel of land in
question into two zones so that the rear portion of the parcel is zoned for
Industrial purposes ; the Board found further that the existing use is compat-
ible with related uses in the area which consist of commercial enterprises
including a paint store , a gasoline service station, a leather shop and a
construction business .
The Board carefully considered all the evidence and its findings and facts ,
and made its conclusion that the granting of this request for a variance
would not derogate from the intent of the zoning ordinance and that not to
grant this variance would impose a substantial hardship on the Petitioner
as it pertained to this particular parcel of land in question.
' The Board having heard all the evidence and after due consideration and
discussion, unanimously voted to grant the variance as requested.
APPEAL GRANTED. CITY OF SALEM - - - BOARD OF APPEALS ,
BY
iv
Acting) Secretary