9 MEAD COURT - BUILDING INSPECTION 'VOW
q`
OURT
MEAD' C
i
(situ ofttlem, lttssttrlTusr##s
;;, 9 �121YI1TtT[� �II?xY� 3 -J1
Mm ,Snlein (6rew C,
FORM A - DECISION
Ms. Deborah Burkinshaw
City Clerk
Salem City Hall
Salem, MA 01970
Dear Ms . Burkinshaw:
At a regularly scheduled meeting of the Salem Planning Board
held on November 4, 1993 it was voted to endorse "Approval Under
Subdivision Control Law Not Required" on the following described
plan :
1 . Applicant :
Glen P. Beaudet
2 . Lucation and Description:
9 Mead Court
460 Square feet is being conveyed from 9 Mead Court to 9 Mead Court
Deed of property records in Essex Soutn District Registry.
Sincerely,
Walter B. Power , III40�"
Chairman
EX\DH\BPFORMA
r.
NOTES:
1 . THIS SUBDIVISION WAS APPROVED
BY THE CITY OF SALEM BOARD OF
APPEAL ON SEPTEMBER 15, 1993 .
2 . LOT B IS NOT TO BE CONSIDERED
A BUILDABLE LOT AND IS TO BECOME
AN INTEGRAL PART OF LOT C .
3 . BEARINGS ARE ON AN ASSUMED BASE .
N/F N/F N/F
EDWARD F . & MANUEL DO
1AL ANDRE M . AOUN
WANDA M . CARSON BOOK 6400/75BOOK 9493 PAGE 511
BOOK 6439 PAGE 704 MAP 27 LOT 62 MAP 27 LOT 61
CONCRETE BLOCKS
IRON RODOVER
(found) 0.31 ' 0.82' S 600-27'-38' W S 61'-09'-46' W
58.81' 12.50' 30.00'
LOT C
ilii sa ft 3.8'
"ERASER" LOT A N
2197 s ft cco "BEAUDET" a
N V
N/F ' o m1 1/2 STORY � iv w , rn i N/F
jr CD � ANTHONY J . &
ARVINDER S . BAHAL ALUMINUM SIDED r\, -
BOOK 6932 PAGE 717 = ` m m SH BOOK 5473/115IRLEY M . RONI
MAP 27 LOT 66 #7 � 2 1/2 STORY z MAP 27 LOT 59
•cmv WOOD
LOT B cn #9
460 sil f t
TOP
BRICK ` 3.5'
0.44 . ' . ' . '
TO NORTH STREET - N 60'-39'-27' E N 60'-39'-27' E
<----- 64.7'+- m �:p N
w" AW m
li. 23122
qF 4
r
I a\Ir4Y
M E A D E COURT ='
" I CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN
WAS MADE IN COMPL IA NCE WITH 10 1 INCH 10 F 10 T 20
THE AUL ES AND REGULATIONS OF
THE REGISTERS OF DEEDS.
SALEM PLANNING BOARD.'
APPROVAL UNDER THE SUBDIVISION SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
CONTROL LAM, REOUIREO.
!i
SUBDIVISION OF LAND PREPARED FOR:
GLEN P . & JANE A . BEAUDET
/ REID LAND SURVEYORS
i
365 CHATHAM ST . , LYNN, MA
SCALE 1 " =10 ' OCTOBER 27, 1993
"R93 006"
93-4
(fit" of �tt1Pm, ��ttsstttllusPttg
' s -BnttrD of Auprnl OCT 4 2 51 93
NA,SS
0-
DECISION ON THE TETITION OF_ GLE_N & JANE BEAUDET FOR VARIANCES AT
7 MEAD COURT ANDL MEAD COURT (R-2)
A hearing on this petition was held September 15, 1993 with the following
Board Members present: Francis X. Grealish, Chairman; George Ahmed,
Stephen O'Grady and Associate Member Arthur Labrecque. Notice of the
hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were
properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with
Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioners, owners of the property at 9 Mead Court, are requesting
variances to allow property at 7 Mead Court (shown on plan as lot A) & 9
Mead Court (shown on plan as Lot C) to be redivided resulting in the
transfer of 460 square feet (shown on the plans as Lot B) from Lot A to Lot
C. 7 Mead Court is owned by P. Blais, D. Hanussak & F.Fraser. Property is
located in an R-2 district.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding by this
Board that:
1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the
land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting
other lands, buildings and structures involved.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact:
1. There was no opposition to the proposed request.
2. The additional land will provide relief to the petitioner for off street
parking.
q .
3. The owner of 8 Mead Court spoke in favor of the petition.
4. The added 460 sq.ft. will increase petitioners land to 1571 sq. ft.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GLEN & JANE BEAUDET FOR A VARIANCE AT
7 MEAD CT. & 9 MEAD CT. , SALEM
page two
5 The granting of the variance will allow petitioner a fuller use of the
property.
6. The proposed division will not have a negative affect from this
proposed division.
7. Additional space for snow plowing for the city will be permitted
because of the removal of on street parking by the petitioner.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented
at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property
but not the district in general.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0, to grant the
variance requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. Division shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted.
3. Petitioner shall present plans to the Planning Board for their
approval.
� o
-r
4. Petitioners shall not park their vehicles on the street.
-c L
VARIANCE GRANTED
September 15, 1993tn LAD
r
m7
George A. Ahmed, Secretary
Board of Appeal
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GLEN & JANE BEAUDET
FOR VARIANCE AT 7 MEAD COURT & 9 MEAD COURT, SALEM
page three
OCT 4 2 51
CIT,
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20
days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City
Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the
Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a
copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20
days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has
been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South
Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record
or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title.
Board of Appeal