87 MASON STREET - BUILDING INSPECTION �} e�� `fie
(situ oftziem, � ttssttcl�usetts
'Boarb of (Appeal
r
�Ni.DiryoY L'.
Ln
j..
L7 ��
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF SANTO, COLLLORONE
FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AtR MASON_ST
A hearing on this petition was held November 20, 1991 with the
following Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman;
Richard Febonio, Edward Luzinski, Mary Jane Stirgwolt. and
Associate Member Ronald Plante. Notice of the hearing was sent
to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly
published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with
Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting a Special Permit
to allow construction of an addition. Said addition will extend
an already nonconforming side setback. The property is located in
an R-2 district.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to
this request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which
provides as follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this
Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the
procedure and conditions set forth in Sections 8-6 and 9-4, grant
Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of
nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension
or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses,
provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or
r expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the
existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special
Permit requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit will
promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the
City's inhabitants.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence
presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the
following findings of fact:
1. The proposed addition will not be substantially more
detrimental than the existing nonconformity.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF SANTO COLLORONE FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT
AT 87 MASON STREET, SALEM
page two o
2. The concerns of the abutters will be met. '
3. The proposed addition will add to the enjoyment and welfare of a
the inhabitants. �d
ro
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence ;
presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as N _
follows:
1. The granting of the Special Permit will requested will not be
substantially detrimental to the public good and will not nullify
or substantially derogate from the intent of the district or the
purpose of the Ordinance.
2. The Special Permit requested can be granted in harmony with
the district and will promote the public health, safety,
convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants.
3. The concerns of the direct abutters have been met and will be
complied with through the conditions that follow.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously,5-0,
to grant the Special Permit requested, subject to the following
conditions:
1. The petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes,
ordinances, codes and regulations.
2. All requirements of the City of Salem Fire Prevention Bureau
relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to.
3. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions
submitted.
4. All construction is to be done with a legal building permit.
5. Petitioner shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy for the
addition.
6. Exterior finishes shall be the same on the new addition as on
the existing structure.
7. All conditions, as amended, submitted to the Board and listed
below shall be complied with.
a. The existing retaining wall to be inspected by the
Building Inspector for strength and integrity. This wall abuts 85
Mason St. and about 28 feet in length and about 2 feet high. If
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF SANTO COLLORONE
FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 87 MASON STREET, SALEM
page three
the wall fails strength and integrity requirements, the wall is to
be replaced.
b. A new retaining wall to be constructed abutting existing
retaining wall at 85 Mason St. to property line of 87 Flint St.
and 1 Oak St. This wall is to be about 14 ft. in length.
c. A 6 ft. stockade fence to be placed on top and secured to
the entire length of the retaining wall(s) (approx. 42 ft. ) . The
front of fence (picket side) is to be facing 85 Mason St. and 87
Flint St. Fence to be of high quality.
d. All plans for construction of addition, retaining wall(s)
and fence to be approved by Building Inspector prior to
construction.
e. All cost of construction, including retaining wall(s) and
fence to be paid for by the applicant for the Special Permit,
except that one half of the cost for the stockade fence abutting
87 Flint St. shall be borne by the owner of 87 Mason St.
SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED
November 20, 1991
Richard A. Bencal,Chairman
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND
THE CITY CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to
Section 17 of MGL Chapter 40A and shall be filed withing 20 days
after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the
City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL, CHAPTER 40A, Section 11, the
variance or special permit granted herein shall not take effect
until a copy of the decision, bearing the certification of the
City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed,
or that, if such appeal has been filed, that is has been dismissed
or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and
indexed under the name or the owner of record or is recorded and
noted on the owner's Certificate of Title.
- cr
w
— s.