Loading...
DRB MINUTES 2000-2003 �000 - aoo3 . Salem Redevelopment Authority Heritage Plaza East and West Urban Renewal Areas SRA and DRB Schedule for 2003 SRA Meeting* DRB Meeting** January 8, 2003 January 29, 2003 February 12, 2003 February 26, 2003 March 12, 2003 March 26, 2003 April 9, 2003 April 23, 2003 May 7, 2003 May 28, 2003 June 11, 2003 June 25, 2003 July 9, 2003 July 23, 2003 August 13, 2003 August 27, 2003 September 10, 2003 September 24, 2003 October 8, 2003 October 22, 2003 November 12, 2003 November 19, 2003 December 10, 2003 December 17, 2003 Note: submittals to All sub tta s must be delivered to the Departmentf • Planning and Community Development, 120 Washington Street, 3`d Floor, Salem, MA at least seven (7)days prior to the scheduled meeting (the Wednesday before each meeting by 4:OOpm). Refer to project submittal requirements for additional information. * All SRA meetings will be held at 6:00 p.m. @ 120 Washington Street, 3`d Floor ** All DRB meetings will be held at 5:30 p.m. @ 120 Washington Street, 3`d Floor r o Salem Redevelopment Authority NOTICE OF MEETING Regular meetings of the Salem Design Review Board will be held at 5:30 p.m., at the office of the Salem Redevelopment Authority, 120 Washington Street, 3`d Floor, Salem, Massachusetts as follows: January 29, 2003 July 23, 2003 February 26, 2003 August 27, 2003 March 26, 2003 September 24, 2003 April 23, 2003 October 22, 2003 • May 28, 2003 November 19, 2003 June 25, 2003 December 17, 2003 SALEM REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Salem, Massachusetts One Salem Green • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 e Salem • ® Redevelopment Authority MEETING CANCELLED The Design Review Board Meeting scheduled for Wednesday, December 17, 2003 has been cancelled. The next regular meeting of the Design Review Board will be on Wednesday,January 28, 2003 at 6:00pm Please contact Tania Hartford, Economic Development Planner, at 978/745-9595 x311 if you have any questions regarding upcoming Design Review Board Meetings. • 120 Washington Street • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 ,e Salem • ® Redevelopment Authority MEMORANDUM TO: Members of the Design Review Board FROM: Tania Hartford, Economic Development Planner( SUBJECT: December Meeting Cancelled DATE: December 16, 2003 CC: Joseph P.Walsh, Executive Director The December 17, 2003 meeting of the Design Review Board has been cancelled due to a lack of agenda items. The next regularly scheduled meeting will be held on January 28, 2004. • For your reference, I am enclosing the 2004 meeting schedule for the SRA and DRB. As always, feel free to contact me should you have any questions or concerns prior to the next meeting. Have a safe and happy holiday! Enclosure • 120 Washington Street • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 e Salem • ® Redevelopment Authority DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Meeting Agenda November 19, 2003 - 6:00pm 120 Washington Street, Third Floor Conference Room Roll Call: Paul Durand Chris Green David Jaquith Fred Johnson Minutes • Review of minutes from the October 22, 2003 meeting. Project list 1. Masonic Temple Building (70 Washington Street) -Review of proposed change in paint color to the exterior trim on the storefronts along Washington and Lynde Streets. 2. Passage to India (157-159 Washington Street) - Review of proposed lighting for the sign along Washington Street. • 120 Washington Street • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 DRB Mies November 19,2003 Page 1 of 1 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD • MEETING MINUTES NOVEMBER 19, 2003 A regular meeting of the Salem Design Review Board (DRB) was held in the third floor conference room at the City Hall Annex, 120 Washington Street, on Wednesday,November 19, 2003 at 6:OOpm. Members Paul Durand, Chris Greene and David Jaquith were present. Valerie Gingrich, Clerk,was also present. Minutes Minutes from the October 22,2003 meeting were reviewed and approved. Project list Passage To India (157-159 Washington Street) -Review of proposed lighting for the sign along Washington Street. Mr. Hugh Kerr, the applicant, stated that he would like to install lighting for his sign along Washington Street. The proposed lighting would be located under the part of the roof that extends from the building,just above the existing sign. • Mr. Durand asked the applicant if the proposed light would illuminate the entire sign. He suggested that two lights be used instead of one. Mr. Greene asked thea applicant if the box of the fight would be painted to match the trim of PP � the building. Mr. Greene suggested that to the extent that the light is visible, paint the light the same color as the trim and center the lights so that they are equidistant. Mr.Durand stressed that they want to make sure that the sign is fully lit, and also that there be no exposed conduit. All three members agreed on the use of two lights that are to be painted the same color as the trim Mr. Greene also suggested adding a straight-line border to the existing sign. The border would be the same color as the existing lettering. All three members agreed that the border should be added to the sign. There being no further business,the meeting was adjourned • Salem e Redevelopment ® Authority DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Meeting Agenda October 22, 2003—6:OOpm 120 Washington Street,Third Floor Conference Room Roll Call: Paul Durand Chris Green David Jaquith Fred Johnson Minutes Review of minutes from the September 24, 2003 meeting. • Project list 1. Salem Five (One Salem Green) —Schematic review of Concept Plans for a proposed sky bridge between One Salem Green and 210 Essex Street. 2. Soular Books (285 Derby Street) —Review of proposed sign revisions. 120 Washington Street • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 DRB Minutes October 22,2003 Page 1 of 1 • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 22, 2003 A regular meeting of the Salem Design Review Board (DRB) was held in the third floor conference room at the City Hall Annex, 120 Washington Street, on Wednesday, October 22,2003 at 6:00pm. Members Paul Durand and David Jaquith were present. Tania Hartford, Economic Development Planner and Valerie Gingrich, Clerk,were also present. Minutes Minutes from the September 24, 2003 meeting were reviewed and approved. Project list Salem Five (One Salem Green) —Schematic review of Concept Plans for a proposed sky bridge between One Salem Green and 210 Essex Street. Mr. Durand recused himself and Ms. Hartford informed the applicants that Mr.Jaquith will comment on the proposal and the Department of Planning&Community Development would decide if more comments are needed before being sent back to the SRA for final • Schematic Approval. Attorney George Atkins stated that the applicants will be integrating proposed signage into the package for review. Mr. Mark Meche, of Winter Street Architects, described the project to Mr.Jaquith. Mr. Meche explained the location of the proposed bridge and described the elevations as transparent,well light,low profile,made with glass and aluminum. Mr.Meche explained that they are currently looking at a truss system instead of the 30' beam. He also stated that they are still working on the energy code for the bridge. Mr.Jaquith suggested that they not heat the bridge. Mr. Meche replied that the applicant would like to heat the bridge and also cool it. Mr. Meche summarized the project as the link from modem building to modern building. Mr.Jaquith stated that he had no problem with the concept of the bridge. Mr. Meche commented that they may look into using columns with a truss structure. Mr. Jaquith stated that he would have no problem with using columns and that it may actually look better with a more interesting pedestrian route below. Mr.Jaquith stated that the concept is good and that the applicant should continue with the design. Ms. Hartford stated that she would be in touch with the applicant regarding the next . step in the process. DRB Minutes October 22,2003 Page 2 of 2 • Soular Books (285 Derby Street) —Review of proposed sign revisions. Ms. Hartford introduced the project as one,which was sent back from the SRA because they did not approve of the color and font. The DRB recommended a change in awning color and font. The current proposal has been changed to include no awning and a different color sign background. Mr. Durand commented that when reviewing signs, the Board members need the context of the sign, including the adjacent signs and facades. He also inquired as to whether the g 1 $t' q th proposed sign is the largest the applicant is allowed. Ms. Hartford stated that the proposed sign is as large as allowed by the sign ordinance. Mr. Durand stated that the sign looks out of proportion, and Mr.Jaquith agreed stating that the sign should be longer. Mr. Durand commented that the color and the font are good. Mr.Jaquith commented that the loss of the awning is regrettable, the typeface is fine,but the sign needs to be stretched. Mr. Durand stated that making the sign narrower and longer would be worse and the board is trapped by the constraints of the sign guidelines. Mr.Jaquith suggested using two white panels on both sides of the sign to keep the sign from looking like it is floating. The members of the board suggested spacing the panels two inches apart from the sign. • Mr. Jaquith also commented that the wording `Books & Gifts" is stretched out too much and the letters need to be compressed, but not the words. The members of the Board stated that the panels should be the same material as the sign and they should be approximately four inches from the side of the building with two inches between the panels and the sign. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned ,0 Salem Redevelopment Authority DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Meeting Agenda September 24, 2003 - 6:00pm 120 Washington Street,Third Floor Conference Room Roll Call: Paul Durand Chris Green David Jaquith Fred Johnson Minutes Review of minutes from the August 27, 2003 meeting. • Project list 1. Salem Chiropractic Associates (72 Washington Street) -Review of proposed sign. 2. Salem Cycl (72 Washington Street) -Review of proposed sign 3. Lobster Shanty (25 Front Street) -Review of proposed sign. 4. Edgewater Cafe (155 Washington Street) -Review of proposed fagade changes. 5. Passage to India (157/159 Washington Street) - Review of proposed signage. 6. City Hall Pizza (128 Washington Street) -Review of proposed signage • 120 Washington Street • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING MINUTES SEPTEMBER 24, 2003 A regular meeting of the Salem Design Review Board (DRB) was held in the third floor conference room at the City Hall Annex, 120 Washington Street, on Wednesday, September 24, 2003 at 6:OOpm. Members Paul Durand and David Jaquith were present. Tania Hartford, Economic Development Planner and Valerie Gingrich,Clerk,were also present. Minutes Minutes from the August 27, 2003 meeting were reviewed and approved. Project List Salem Chiropractic Associates (72 Washington Street) - Review of proposed sign. The proposed signage includes one 24"x 36" hanging sign with metal bracket. The hanging sign will be MDO Plywood with imitation gold leaf text, a brown background,white border and logo. • The Board recommended approval of the proposed signage. Salem Cycle (72 Washington Street)—Review of proposed sign. The proposed signage includes one 32"x 36" hanging sign with a metal bracket. The hanging sign will be MDO Plywood with gold vinyl text and a black background. Mr. Durand asked the applicant to clarify where the sign will be located, and the applicant replied that the sign will be over the window centered. The Board recommended approval of the proposed signage. Lobster Shanty(25 Front Street)—Review of proposed sign. The proposed signage includes one 33"x 42" hanging sign with metal bracket on a black post. The hanging sign will be MDO Plywood with gold vinyl text, a red lobster and a green background with light green and black accents. Mr. Durand asked where the post will be. Ms. Hartford explained that the post will be in exactly the same location. Mr. Jaquith inquired as to how the sign would be lit. The applicant replied that there are existing floodlights on the building that will illuminate the sign. • The Board recommended approval of the proposed signage as submitted. t • Edgewater Cafe (155 Washington Street)—Review of proposed facade changes The proposed renovation will include replacing an existing window along Washington Street with an emergency door. The work will mirror the entranceway at Liberty Tax, directly next door. The board recommended approval of the renovation as proposed. Passage to India (157/159 Washington Street)—Review of proposed signage The proposed signage includes one 11"x 10' wall sign made from MDO Plywood with an off-white background and red letters. The signage will be the same size as Liberty Tax and the sign maker will match the same background approved for this sign. Mr. Durand asked the applicant to provide a chip of the actual color red. Mr. Durand asked where the sign fits on the building, and the applicant stated the sign is centered between the vestibules and flat against the building under the overhang. Mr.Jaquith asked if the font is specific to Indian restaurants. The applicant replied that it is and it is very much like Indian writing. The board recommended approval of the signage as proposed. • City Hall Pizza (128 Washington Street)—Review of proposed signage The proposed signage includes two wall signs (exactly the same as previous tenant) each measuring 1'x 8' that are red plastic with white vinyl letters. The owner put the signs up without a permit and they are asking approval as installed. Mr. Jaquith stated that the words need to be closer together, and Mr. Durand agreed. Mr. Durand suggested that the applicant extend the sign to cover the blue edges of where the sign is attached to the building. The applicant stated that he could fill the space behind the sign to make the sign attached flat against the building. Mr. Durand suggested that the applicant use a different font that is not as bold and a little more elegant. Mr.Jaquith clarified that the font should be lighter, but not a script font. The applicant suggested using Palatino, and the board members stated that it would be fine. Mr. Jaquith suggested trying it two ways, one with all-caps and one without. The key is not to have bold font. The board recommended approval of the proposed sign with the conditions that the applicant use Palatino font and fill in the space behind the sign, and increase the signs length so that it covers the blue pillars and the sign lays flat on the building. There being no further business,the meeting was adjourned DESIGN REVIEW BOARD • MINUTES FOR THE MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 27, 2003 A regular meeting of the Salem Design Review Board (DRB) was held in the third floor conference room at the City Hall Annex, 120 Washington Street, on Wednesday,August 27, 2003 at 5:30pm. Members Paul Durand and David Jaquith were present. Tania Hartford, Economic Development Planner and Valerie Gingrich, Clerk,were also present. Minutes Minutes from the July 23,2003 meeting were reviewed and approved. Old Business • Edgewater Cafe Outdoor Cafe Ms. Hartford informed the Board that the SRA accepted the recommendation of the DRB in reference to the Outdoor Cafe, but the SRA gave the DRB a time limit of sixty days to review the cafe and make changes. Mr. Durand commented that the chain should not be white, because it is seen too well. Mr. Durand also commented that all of the posts should be the same height, and that the chain cannot be attached to the conduit on the building. . • The Board recommended that the chain be black, the posts be the same height, add an additional post at the building, and have only one chain from post to post. Project List Culver Insurance (20 Central Street) —Review of proposed sign. The proposed signage includes two wall signs along Central Street and the adjacent alley. The proposed signs will be aluminum with a black background and gold leaf lettering, flush mounted to the wall. Mr. Durand commented that it is a good sign, and the applicant replied that the signs would match those around them in the same complex. Mr.Jaquith inquired as to whether the two signs are the same size,and the applicant replied that one sign is 8"x 48"and the other is 12" x 72"in size. The Board recommended approval of the proposed signage. Boston Hotdog Company (60 Washington Street)—Review of proposed sign. The proposed signage includes one 43" x 33" hanging sign with metal bracket and one 1' x 10'wall sign. The hanging sign will be hand carved wood with a black background, Italian gold leaf letters, and an image of a hotdog. The hanging sign would be attached to a metal bracket. The proposed wall sign will be hand carved wood with a black background and gold lettering in the existing sign . band along Washington Street. r . s • Mr. Durand commented that the dimensions on the drawing of the hanging sign do not look proportional, and stated that perhaps the dimensions were inverted. Mr. Durand asked what the sign would be made from. The applicant replied that the sign would be made of composition wood and the letters and hotdog would be hand carved. Mr. Durand commented that the dimensions of the hanging sign seem to be inverted and that the sign seems too large. The applicant agreed that the dimensions must have been inverted, and asked the Board what they would like the dimensions of the sign to be. The Board recommended that the hanging sign be 24" x 36" and then the wall sign would be 14" x 12' in size. The Board recommended that the proposed signage be approved with the above size changes. Laura Lane Skin Care (242 Essex Street)—Review of proposed sign & awning. The proposed signage includes one awning with 6"x 8'lettering and two 18'x 4'window signs. The proposed awning will be green with white lettering. The proposed window signs will be white vinyl letters attached to the inside of the windows along Essex Street. The `Bootery" sign will be removed and the area will be painted with the same color. The awning will be recovered with an aqua color canvas. Mr. Durand asked the applicant why she chose aqua, and Ms. Lane replied that the interior will have aqua and that the skin care line that she will carry has aqua packaging. • The applicant commented that the Army Navy Store has green and the Phoenix School has blue, so the aqua should fit in. Mr. Durand commented that a darker shade would be better than the color submitted. The Board agreed that the applicant must submit a swatch of the fabric to be used,which should be darker than that submitted. The Board recommended approval of the signage with the condition that they see and approve the fabric swatch prior. Temptations/Balloons & Baskets (304 Essex Street)—Review of proposed awning and facade improvements The proposed awning will replace the existing awning and be exactly the same dimensions. The applicant is also proposing to repaint the front of the building. The applicant explained that he does not do walk-in retail business at the location. The Board recommended that the font be "Goudy" and the words be centered on the awning. In addition, the letters should be spaced out more. The applicant proposed to repaint the facade an off-white color, because white makes it look dirty. The Board suggested that the applicant paint it white to match the windows. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned • ,e Salem • Redevelopment Authority Design Review Board Meeting Agenda July 23, 2003 Roll Call: Paul Durand Chris Green David Jaquith Fred Johnson • Minutes Review of minutes from the June 25, 2003 meeting. Project list 1. Victory Chapel (60 Washington Street) —Continued review of proposed sign 2. Culver Insurance (20 Central Street) —Review of proposed sign. 3. Edgewater Cafe (155 Washington Street) —Review of amendment to cafe design 4. Edggwater Caf46 (155 Washington Street) —Review of proposed signage 5. Lawrence Place (143 Washington Street/32 Front Street) —Review of final submission for the redevelopment of the former Bleachers Building. • 120 Washington Street • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MINUTES FOR THE MEETING HELD ON JULY 23, 2003 A regular meeting of the Salem Design Review Board (DRB) was held in the third floor conference room at the City Hall Annex, 120 Washington Street, on Wednesday, July 23, 2003 at 5:30pm. Members Paul Durand and David Jaquith were present. Tania Hartford, Economic Development Planner and Valerie Gingrich,Clerk,were also present. Minutes Minutes from the June 25, 2003 meeting were reviewed and approved. Projects Edgewater Cafe (155 Washington Street)—Review of outdoor cafe amendment. Mr. Dennis Moustakis presented to the Board the amendment to the original cafe permit which includes using two (2) 8-foot umbrellas that sit inside planters and a white chain attached to four (4) planter bollards that cordon off the cafe located on Front Street. Ms. Hartford commented that the umbrellas would need to be checked to see if they comply with zoning requirements for the sidewalk. Mr. Moustakis commented that the umbrellas do meet the requirements of an egress of five feet and the umbrellas only come out to where the cafe ends. • Mr. Moustakis explained that the white chain would be connected to planter bollards to cordon off the cafe. Mr. Durand and Mr. Jaquith inquired as to whether black chain could be used, and Mr. Moustakis explained that white was chosen in order for it to be seen better. Mr.Jaquith stated that the applicant can go ahead with the white chain, but once it is up it will be reviewed for final approval. The Board voted to give a positive recommendation to the SRA for the cafe amendment. Edgewater Cafe (155 Washington Street)— Review of proposed signage. Mr.Moustakis presented the Board with the proposed signage,which includes two (2) 10"x 12'signs that read"Edgewater Cafe" in the signboards,two (2) 3.8'x 13'signs that read"Authentic Mexican" in the panels above the windows,and two (2) 1.25'x 5'address/phone/website identification signs in the windows. All signs will be made with vinyl lettering and will be located along Front and Washington Streets. The Board members agreed that the spacing of the address such be reduced to half of what was proposed. The Board gave a positive recommendation to the SRA for the proposed signage on the condition that the spacing on the address sign is half of what was proposed. Lawrence Place (143 Washington Street/32 Front Street)—Review of final submission for the redevelopment of the former Bleachers Building. • Mr. David Pabich presented the Board with the previous two concerns: Roof material and narrower muttons. The muttons are actually narrower than what was suggested, and will be more in line with Page 1 of 2 f • what was there historically. Mr.Jaquith inquired as to whether all of the windows will be replaced, and Mr.Pabich replied that they would. Mr. Jaquith inquired as to who the window manufacturer is, and Mr. Pabich replied that it is Trimline. Mr.Durand asked whether the windows are the same as what was used on the Townhouse Square building, and Mr. Pabich answered that they are the same. The Board commented that the muttons look good. Mr. Pabich proposed additional skylights on the Front Street side of the building. Mr. Jaquith inquired as to what type of skylight and what manufacturer would be used, and Mr. Pabich replied that it would probably be a non-operable type and he was not sure what manufacturer. The Board members suggested that he reconsider and use skylights that are operable. Also, the manufacturer, Velux,was suggested as the best option, and Anderson as an alternative. The Board members gave a positive recommendation to the SRA for the final submission. Culver Insurance (20 Central Street) – Review of proposed sign. The applicant was not able attend the meeting, so the Board agreed that the applicant would have to resubmit for the next meeting. Victory Chapel (60 Washington Street)—Review of proposed sign. The Board members gave a positive recommendation to the SRA for the proposed sign, which includes one (1) 16"x 8'wall sign with white letters and a black background in the existing sign band • along Washington Street and will be made from PVC material. The sign will conform to the other signs within the same building. There being no further business,the meeting was adjourned Page 2 of 2 eSalem • ® Redevelopment Authority Design Review Board Meeting Agenda June 25, 2003 Roll Call: Paul Durand Chris Green David Jaquith Fred Johnson Don Giard • Project list 1. Rockafellas Restaurant (Washington Street) —Review of proposed outdoor cafe 2. Aroma Sanctum Perfumes (5 Central Street) —Review of Proposed Sign 3. Salem's Color Comer (60 Washington Street) —Review of proposed sign 4. Winer Brothers (Lafayette Street) —Review of proposed sign 5. Victory Chapel (60 Washington Street) —Review of proposed sign 6. Nost (103 Washington Street) —Review of proposed sign • 120 Washington Street • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MINUTES JUNE 25, 2003 A regular meeting of the Salem Design Review Board (DRB) was held in the third floor conference room at the City Hall Annex, 120 Washington Street, on Wednesday, June 25, 2003 at 5:30pm. Members Chris Green and Don Giard were present. Tania Hanford, Economic Development Planner and Valerie Gingrich,Clerk,were also present. Rockafellas Restaurant(227-231 Essex Street)—Review of proposed outdoor cafe. The applicants, T. Kevin Marchino and David McKillop, described the proposed cafe tabletops as white and green heavy Corian. The proposed chain to be used to section off the cafe will be thick, black plastic chain. The chain will-be linked through stands that consist of a die cast pole with a base. Mr. Green suggested that they choose materials that have a substantial look to them rather than temporary looking materials such as the lightweight plastic chain. He suggested that an aluminum chain would have a more substantial look and would still be more lightweight. Mr. Giard suggested using raised planters instead of poles to separate the cafe from the rest of the streetscape because it keeps the area open and adds some color. Mr. Green • commented that planters are very hard to move when they have soil in them, and there is also the problem of what to do with them in the winter. He further commented that they do not want to lose the sense that it is a public sidewalk. Mr. Green commented that the street in front of the building is not level. Mr. Marchino replied that using poles and chain would help to alleviate this problem because they could use different height poles as necessary. Mr. Green suggested using free-standing black cast metal, possibly aluminum, bollards with broad bases with a black metal chain of the weight that the applicants supplied at the meeting. The applicants agreed to supply catalogue specifications for the base to the DRB. Mr. Green inquired as to whether there would be a waiter station outside. Mr. Marchino replied that the hallway inside the doors is very large and that they could probably place a waiter station there. He stated that they would rather have it inside. Mr. Green stated that most outdoor cafes in Boston have an outdoor waiter station setup with menus and other items. He stated that his concern is with access and noted that the doorway should not be too narrow. Mr. Giard inquired about the manholes in the cafe location. Mr. Marchino replied that the majority of the manholes in the cafe location are level and that they stayed away from the one manhole that is not level. • Mr. Giard inquired about lighting for the evening. The applicants replied that it is bright with light coming from the streetlights and the marquee. Page 1 of 5 • Mr. Giard inquired about proposed umbrellas for the cafe. Mr. Marchino stated that the umbrellas would be green or black, and that they would have separate bases. Mr. Giard suggested green or off-white for the umbrellas. Mr. Killop stated that they were considering black because the awning are black. Mr. Giard stated that the umbrellas do not have to match the awnings. Mr. Green agreed and suggested that they use green. The applicants agreed to provide specifications for the bollards to be used to hold the chain to section off the cafe. Mr. Green stated that he was prepared to approve the layout, location,tables, and chairs, but they needed to see the specifications of the poles/bollards. Mr. Marchino showed the Board wire cable that would be used at night to secure the tables and chairs. Mr. Green suggested that the cable be black. The Board gave a positive recommendation to the layout, the umbrella, and the chain contingent on the submittal and approval of the base/bollard specifications. Ms. Hartford inquired about the holes at the basement windows. Mr. Marchino replied that they had been mulched and would be landscaped. Aroma Sanctum Perfumes (5 Central Street)—Review of proposed sign. Mr. Giard introduced the sign proposed and stated that there was an issue of the proposed iron bracket not matching the brackets of the other sign brackets on the building. The • applicant, Akura Kulak, stated that the previous iron bracket (that matched the other two) was missing and the owner did not know what happened to it. The proposed iron bracket is one that the owner has and would like to use. Mr. Green stated that due to the molding on the building, the bracket proposed would not work and a new bracket would probably have to be custom made. Mr. Giard informed the Ms. Kulak of the Main Streets Program which would help to cover the cost of a custom made bracket. Mr. Green asserted that the bracket should match the other brackets. Ms. Kulak stated that the sign company that she was working with could not locate the style of bracket that had been there previously. Mr. Giard replied that he spoke with a representative of a sign company and found that such a bracket could be custom made. Mr. Green stated that the sign itself is fine. The font is fine, but the words should have more space between them without getting closer to the edge of the sign. The members agreed that the color and overall layout of the sign is good. Ms. Kulak stated that the sign would be made of a heavy PVC material. The members stated that the material was fine. The members gave a positive recommendation on the conditions that the words and the symbol have more space around them and therefore are smaller, and that the iron bracket • match the two brackets on each side. Page 2 of 5 Mr. Giard stated that he would provide blacksmith information for the iron bracket when • the applicant resubmitted the revised graphics. Salem's Color Corner(60 Washington Street)—Review of proposed sign. Mr. Giard pointed out the proposed p p posed locations of the two wall signs, one on Washington Street and one on Lynde Street. Mr. Green commented that he liked that the proposed sign is similar to other nearby signs. Mr. Green stated that the lettering is cramped and the font is modern and fat. The applicant, Kevin Millet, replied that they had used a font, Franklin Gothic,which they were told was acceptable. Mr. Green stated that given the other signs in the area and the historic building, the applicants need a more historically appropriate font. Mr. Green commented that the color of the proposed sign is acceptable. Mr. Giard inquired about the height of the sign band, and Mr. Green commented that the sign band should be the same as the Courthouse Deli next door. Mr. Green stated that the preferred dimension is 16 inches as opposed to the proposed 22 inches. Mr. Millet suggested a smaller size serif font. Mr. Green suggested using one of the classic newspaper fonts. The applicant stated that they would use Claredon font. The members agreed that Claredon would be perfect. Mr. Green inquired whether the applicants would use all capital letters, and they confirmed that they would. • Mr. Giard asked the applicants, Mr. Millet and Lenny D'Italia to clarify exactly where the sign would be placed and exactly what distance it would cover. Mr. D'Italia replied that the sign would be centered above the two windows, and the sign is smaller than the length of the windows. Mr. Green suggested that the applicants give a border around the sign with routed edges (similar to the Courthouse Deli sign). Mr. Giard asked the applicants to make the suggested changes and resubmit the changes to him for final approval at the next Salem Redevelopment Authority(SRA) meeting. Victory Chapel (60 Washington Street)—Review of proposed sign. The applicant, Sean Hester, explained that the sign is for the same building as Salem's Color Corner. Mr. Green stated that like the sign for Salem's Color Corner,the sign would need to be 16 inches high. Mr. Hester described the existing sign, which is white plastic with aluminum facing. Mr. Green commented that the font is acceptable, but the colors, layout, and overall look are not. Mr. Green inquired as to how important it is for the flame logo to be on the sign. Mr. Hester replied that is not necessary. Mr. Green stated that the sign can and should be more spaced out with a border. Mr.Hester inquired as to what colors and materials are acceptable. Mr. Green replied that white is good. • Page 3 of 5 • Mr. Giard suggested using material that is thicker and looks more substantial, such as wood. The applicant described a heavy plastic material that has a finish that looks exactly like wood with a mahogany finish. Mr. Hester agreed to resubmit his application to the DRB with the suggested changes. The applicant agreed to take down the existing sign that did not receive approval. The members suggested hanging a temporary sign in the window. Nostalgia (103 Washington Street)—Review of proposed sign. The applicant, Kim Raines, presented the Board with her proposed sign. The sign is white outlined in black with lavender flowers. The location of the sign is level to Pamplemouse (next door) on Washington Street. Mr. Green commented that he liked the shape, color, and general layout of the sign but the font is not very readable because it is too thin and has variable letter sizes. Ms. Raines stated that she actually wanted to use the font on her business card, but it did not work. Mr. Green commented that the use of capital letters and lower case letters is great. He also commented that the shape, color and layout convey the message and the lettering can be somewhat neutral. Mr. Giard commented that the white border on the lettering may not help with the readability. Mr. Green inquired as to what the sign would be made of. Ms. Raines replied • that it would be made of wood and painted. She suggested that all black lettering might be better, and the members agreed. Mr. Green suggested using fonts such as Baskerville or Garamond. Mr. Giard asked the applicant to specify the location and asked whether there is enough room in the green panel to install the sign. Ms. Raines replied that there is enough room. Mr. Giard asked the applicant to sketch in the location of the sign. Ms. Raines agreed to submit the suggested changes to be reviewed for final approval at the next meeting of the SRA. Winer Brothers (Lafayette Street)—Review of proposed sign. Ms. Hartford stated that the applicant,Allan Houle,was not able to attend the meeting. She explained that he is applying for approval of the sign that is already up. If it is not approved he will have to take it down. Mr. Green commented that the sign is not ready to be approved because the lettering, "ACE Hardware," is too big. Mr. Giard commented that the sign looks too big, partly because it is low. Mr. Green asked if the sign is 9 feet high. The members agreed that the font is fine, but the logo needs to be smaller and the entire sign needs to be smaller. Mr. Green suggested that the sign be 36 inches by 48 inches. Mr. Giard stated that the material is thin PVC. • Page 4 of 5 • The members agreed that they could not give a positive recommendation as it is. He will have to resubmit to the DRB. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned • • Page 5 of 5 f r a Salem Redevelopment Authority DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Meeting Agenda May 28, 2003 Roll Call: Paul Durand Chris Green David Jaquith Fred Johnson Don Giard Project list • 1. Salem Laundry Building (51-71 Lafayette Street) —Continuation of design review of proposed building renovation 2. Lawrence Place (133-137 Front Street) — Schematic Design Review of exterior building renovation 3. Liberty Tax Service (155 Washington Street) — Review of proposed wall sign 4. Ro4�kafellas,(227 Essex Street) —Review of proposed awnings and signage 5. Essex Condominiums (Essex/ Church Street) —Review of proposed replacement windows 6. East India Garage (Liberty Street) —Review of proposed mural 7. Salem YMCA (120 Washington Street) —Review of revised sign proposal S. Fuel (196 Essex Street) —Review of proposed hanging sign 9. Soular Books and Gifts (285 Derby Street) —Review of proposed sign and awning • One Salem Green • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 Design Review Board Meeting Agenda May 28, 2003 Roll Call: Paul Durand Chris Green David Jaquith Fred Johnson Don Giard Project list • 1. Liberty Tax Service (Washington Street) —Proposed wall sign 2. Rockafellers (227 Essex Street) —Proposed awnings and signage 3. Essex House Condominiums (Essex/ Church Street) —Proposed replacement windows 4. Lawrence Place (Front Street) —Schematic Review of building Review 5. Salem Laundry Building (51-71 Lafayette Street) — Final Submission review of proposed building renovation—NEED UPDATED INFO. 6. Fuel (196 Essex Street) —Review of proposed sign (TBD) 7. Salem YMCA (120 Washington Street) —Review of revised sign application (TBD) 8. Soular Gifts (Derby Street) —Review of revised sign application (TBD) • ,&Lo Salem UM Redevelopment Authority DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Meeting Agenda April 23, 2003 Roll Call: Paul Durand Chris Green David Jaquith Fred Johnson Don Giard Project list • 1. Fuel (196 Essex Street) —Review of proposed outdoor cafe permit 2. Salem Laundry Building (51-71 Lafayette Street) —Continuation of schematic design review One Salem Green • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 e Salem ® Redevelopment Authority Design Review Board March 26, 2003 Roll Call: Paul Durand Chris Green David Jaquith Fred Johnson Don Giard Project list 1. Comcast (133 Washington Street) —Review of proposed signage. • 2. City Hall Elevator Project (93 Washington Street) — Final review final of the installation of an elevator at City Hall. 3. Townhouse Square (99 Washington Street) —Final review of proposed facade improvements. 4. Heritage Cooperative Bank (35 St. Peter Street) —Schematic review of proposed site plan and exterior changes. Other business 1. Approval of 2003 meeting schedule. • 120 Washington Street • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 re Salem ® Redevelopment Authority Design Review Board February 26, 2003 Roll Call: Paul Durand Chris Green David Jaquith Fred Johnson Don Giard Project list • 1. Peabody Essex Museum (Essex Street)—Continuation of Campus Signage Review 2. Townhouse Square(99 Washington Street)— Schematic Review of Proposed Fagade Improvements 3. CVS Pharmacy (200 Essex Street)—Review of Proposed Signage 120 Washington Street • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 Design Review Board Minutes of the Meeting February 26, 2003 A meeting of the Design Review Board was held in the third floor conference room at 120 Washington Street on Wednesday, February 26, 2003 at 5:30 p.m. Those in attendance were: Paul Durand, David Jaquith and Don Giard. CVS Pharmacy(200 Essex Street) Michael Caggiano of Plymouth Sign Company presented a new sign package for 200 Essex Street. He explained that the original proposal included changing the color of the existing internally-illuminated signage from black to red. After working with the City, the applicant agreed to remove the internally-illuminated signage and focus on a more substantial storefront improvement project. The new application includes a 25" x 172" wood-carved wood sign, a 36" x 48" wood carved hanging sign with black decorative metal bracket, three gooseneck-style light fixtures, and four red fabric awnings. Each awning will have an 8" valance with 5"white lettering. Mr. Durand asked Mr. Caggiano if they had chosen a color for the light fixtures. Mr. Caggiano • stated that his applicant preferred white. Mr. Durand requested that the color of the fixtures be changed to black. Mr. Jaquith and Mr. Giard agreed with the suggestion. Mr. Giard asked Mr. Caggiano if they had determined the ground clearance for the awnings. He stated that the awnings should be low enough the shelter pedestrians and provide a sense of enclosure. Based on the dimensions of the storefront, Mr. Giard recommended a 7'-6" ground clearance. Mr. Giard asked the other members if there were any additional comments. The members then voted unanimously to approve the application with the condition that the light fixtures be changed to a black color and that the ground clearance for the awnings be set at 7'-6". Peabody Essex Museum (Essex Street) Museum spokesperson Greg Liakos updated the Board on the regulatory and design status of the campus signage program. Mr. Liakos outlined the changes that had been made in response to the Board of Appeals and the Salem Historic Commission. These changes include reducing the height of the free-standing banners along the Essex Mall and Charter Street and the elimination of the signage along Hawthorne Boulevard. Mr. Liakos stated that the museum may propose signage along Hawthorne Boulevard at a later date, but their current focus is on the six remaining banners for the museum opening. Will Phippin from the Peabody Essex stated that the Museum • is now proposing a stripped-down package approved by the Zoning Board of Appeals. Mr. Liakos explained that the revised application includes a total of six free-standing banners. The height of the banner poles has been reduced from 30' to 26' and the height of the banners • has been reduced from 18' to 14'-6". He explained that the intent of the banners was to provide liveliness and color and to highlight the changing exhibits of the museum. Mr. Liakos also stated that the application includes two pedestrian-scaled directional signs to be located along the esplanade between Charter Street and Essex Street. He explained that the museum plans to continue working with the City on schemes to identify the their campus in a historically sensitive way. Mr. Durand stated that he felt the Design Review Board did not have an issue with the previous application. Mr. Jaquith agreed with Mr. Durand and stated that he preferred the larger signs. Mr. Jaquith asked Mr. Liakos if there are any remaining Historic Commission issues facing the museum. Mr. Liakos explained that the Historic Commission had some concerns with the sight lines of the historic properties along Hawthorne Boulevard that led to the revisions. Mr. Jaquith asked when the entire plan would be presented. Mr. Phippin explained that the museum will form a partnership with the City and that the City will take the lead role. Mr. Giard thanked the museum for their updated presentation and asked the other board members if there were any other issues. The board then voted unanimously to provide a positive recommendation for the revised proposal as submitted. • Townhouse Square (99 Washington Street) David Pabich, P.E., project manager for Townhouse Square, presented photographs, plans and specifications for a storefront renovation schematic design proposal at 99, 101 and 103 Washington Street and 230 and 232 Essex Street. Mr. Pabich outlined the existing storefront conditions, including two fluted cast iron columns that were discovered during the exploratory demolition process. He explained that the proposal includes the removal of simulated granite, metal paneling, and slate roof structure. These areas will be trimmed with exterior grade MDX and framed with 1"x 6"pine boards. The interior of the frames will be trimmed with quarter- round trim. The proposal includes the installation of new Morgan full light exterior wood doors and sidelights. A new storefront will be created by removing a portion of a brick wall along Washington Street and replacing it with a new picture window and wood doorway. The existing cast iron columns will be exposed and painted Atrium white. Mr. Pabich also presented plans for a 16' x 16' roof deck for the flat roof above 230 Essex Street. He explained that the roof deck will have a 42" high railing with 1" square spindles. A new access structure for the deck will be built near the center of the roof span. Mr. Pabich presented photographs that illustrated the visibility of the roof deck from the street. Mr. Durand asked Mr. Pabich if they intended to paint the brick wall along Washington Street. Mr. Pabich explained that they intended to use Atrium white paint for this section of brick and that they may consider removing a portion of this brick wall at a later date. • Mr. Giard asked Mr. Pabich if he had considering using wood paneling for the remaining brick wall section to match the rest of the storefront. Mr. Pabich stated that they had considered that option, but preferred to paint the brick since they may remove a portion of the brick wall at a • later date. He explained that they did not want to install work that may eventually be removed during a future renovation. Mr. Jaquith inquired about the height of the roof deck railing. Mr. Pabich explained that the roof deck will be 42" high as required by the building code. Mr. Durand inquired about the height of the roof access structure. Mr. Pabich stated that it would be one-story in height. Mr. Jaquith asked Mr. Pabich what material would be used for the railing. Mr. Pabich explained g P that the proposed material is wood. At this time, Mr. Pabich stated that he was interested in moving as quickly as possible with his project. He asked the board if there was any way to expedite the review process. Mr. Giard explained that there is a two-phase review process that includes Schematic Design and Final Submission. If there are no further comments, the board can vote to recommend approval of the Schematic Design. This recommendation would be forwarded to the SRA for final approval. Once the SRA approves the Schematic Phase, they can then forward the project back the DRB for the Final Submission Phase. Mr. Pabich asked the board what additional information would be required for the Final • Submission Phase. He stated that he would be willing to submit any additional information prior to the next SRA meeting to expedite the project. Mr. Jaquith and Mr. Durand stated that they could make themselves available prior to the next SRA meeting to assist the applicant. Mr. Giard explained that a Final Submission would include more detailed drawings and specifications. Mr. Giard stated that he could provide an example of a recently approved submission for review by the applicant. Mr. Giard stated that the only action the board can take tonight is to recommend approval of the Schematic Phase. He stated that the DRB recommendation would be considered by the SRA and that the SRA does have the ability to give final approval to the project without sending it back to the DRB. At this time, the board voted unanimously to recommend approval of the Schematic Design submission. Mr. Giard explained that this recommendation would be forwarded to the SRA for approval at the their next scheduled meeting on March 12, 2003. Mr. Giard also stated that he would forward a copy of a recent Final Design submission package to the applicant for their review. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. • r Salem a • Redevelopment Authority DESIGN REVIEW BOARD January 29, 2003 Roll Call: Paul Durand Chis Green David Jaquith FredJohnson Don Giard Project list • 1. CVS Pharmacy (200 Essex Street)—Review of proposed sign • One Salem Green • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 Salem ® Redevelopment Authority Design Review Board January 7, 2003 Roll Call: Paul Durand Chris Green David Jaquith Fred Johnson Don Giard Project list 1. Beverly Cooperative Bank(New Derby Street)—Continuation of • Schematic Review 2. Salem Laundry Building (51-71 Lafayette Street)— Schematic Review of redevelopment proposal 3. Hess Gas Station (295 Derby Street)—Review of color and material samples • 120 Washington Street • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 • Design Review Board Minutes of the Meeting Tuesday, January 7, 2003 III A meeting of the Design Review Board was held in the third floor conference room at 120 Washington Street on Tuesday, January 7, 2003 at 5:30 p.m. Those in attendance were: Paul Durand, David Jaquith and Don Giard. Beverly Cooperative Bank (73-87 Lafayette Street) Attorney George Atkins updated the Board on the regulatory and design status of the project. Members from their design team discussed the design changes that had been made in response to the comments from the DRB. These changes include: more glazing at the rear of the building, the inclusion of an all-brick exterior with stone accents, a larger sign and more substantial community room entrance at the rear of the building, additional shade tree, the use of unit pavers in place of colored concrete, a new decorative unit paver crosswalk, extension of the groundcover planting bed near the public parking area, new handicap ramp near the community room and the installation of two additional free-standing light fixtures near the public parking area. • Mr. Giard inquired about the walkway connection from the harbor walk to the community room that was mentioned at the last DRB meeting. David Payne, landscape architect for the project, stated that the applicant has proposed the installation of grass pavers in the area between the harbor walk and the community room. He stated that this area would be able to withstand vehicular and pedestrian activity. Mr. Giard stated that this meeting had been coordinated to precede tomorrow nights SRA meeting. He asked the other DRB members if they had any other comments for the applicant. At this time the DRB members thanked the applicant for their efforts and gave a positive recommendation for the Schematic Design submission. Salem Laundry Building (51-71 Lafayette Street) Paul Durand excused himself from the meeting during the Salem Laundry Building presentation. Mark Meche of Winter Street Architects made an introductory presentation to the Board. He stated that the Board of Appeals had unanimously approved a height variance for the project. At this time, they are looking for Schematic Approval to proceed with the project. The existing building consists of a brick portion along New Derby Street and a concrete portion at the rear, which was one of the earliest examples of reinforced concrete in the area. He explained that the building has significant structural issues and will require approximately $1 million in rremediation. Their proposal includes the removal of the upper levels, restoration of the remaining portions of the fagade (including the ground level storefronts) and the construction of three new levels. The new construction will include a series of terraces that will step down to the • street. He stated that their approach is to maintain a strong street presence while reducing the bulk with new construction that steps back from the street. He also stated that their proposal will include a significant corner element and a series of vertical elements along Derby Street to create a rhythm along the street. Mr. Meche stated that they are seeking a positive recommendation from the DRB for their schematic submission. Mr. Jaquith inquired about the building materials for the new construction. Mr. Meche stated that that this has not been determined but they are looking into the use of stucco or cast stone. Mr. Jaquith stated that he most concerned with the relationship between the new construction and the original building. He stated that he is interested in the articulation of the new construction including the shade and shadow lines and other details. He asked Mr. Meche if their intention was to recede from the street. Mr. Meche stated that their approach was to recede from the street and that the surface material will have a smoother texture than the rest of the building. Mr. Giard stated that he supported the general concept, including the preservation of the original • storefronts and the massing concept for the new construction. He asked Mr. Meche if they had considered a more prominent corner treatment for the building, such as a tower feature. Mr. Meche stated that they had received other requests for a more prominent corner and that that was something that they were investigating. He stated that this project has the potential to act as a gateway building for this part of the downtown. Mr. Jaquith requested a copy of the building floor plans. He explained that this would help him understand the exterior design decisions and issues. Mr. Meche stated that they could provide this information at the next meeting. Mr. Meche also inquired about the schematic design approval process. Mr. Giard stated that additional information would need to be submitted and reviewed by the DRB. Additional meetings would be required prior to a recommendation. Mr. Jaquith and Mr. Giard agreed that the general concept was positive and that the applicant was heading in the right direction. Mr. Giard suggested that the applicant provide additional photographs, rough elevations, rough sections, etc. for review. He stated that Schematic Phase was the time in which the applicant could explore different design solutions without getting locked into construction plans. • Mr. Jaquith stated that the vertical elements proposed by the applicant were not effective. He suggested that they explore alternatives. Mr. Meche stated that they had been working on this feature and that they would investigate this further. • Hess Gas Station (295 Derby Street] Mr. Giard presented roof shingle samples, tile samples, and brick samples submitted by the applicant. The Design Review Board members reviewed the samples and selected the following: Heritage SWB Modular by Redland Brick, Inc.; Heather Blend shingle of Timberline Shingle; green and tile sample were approved. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. • • e , Salem • ffM Redevelopment Authority DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Meeting Agenda December 4, 2002 Roll Call: Paul Durand Chris Green David Jaquith Fred Johnson Don Giard Project List 1. Peabody Essex Museum (Essex Street) —Continuation of design review for proposed campus sign package 2. Beverly Cooperative Bank(Derby Street)—Continuation of Schematic Review 3. Heritage Bank(35 St. Peter Street)—Schematic Review of proposed site plan and exterior changes 4. Bowman Building (266 Essex Street)—Final Submission Review 5. Winter Street Realty Trust (209 Essex Street)—Review of proposed topiary fence at rear of building 6. City Hall Window Box— (93 Washington Street)—Review of new decorative window box • One Salem Green • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 e Design Review Board • Minutes of the Meeting December 4, 2002 A regular meeting of the Design Review Board was held in the third floor conference room at 120 Washington Street on Wednesday, December 4, 2002 at 5:30 p.m. Those in attendance were: Paul Durand, Chris Greene and Don Giard. Winter Street Realty Trust (209 Essex Street) Paul Durand excused himself from the meeting. Stacia Cooper, from Winter Street Architects, presented an application for a new fence at the rear of 209 Essex Street. Ms. Cooper explained that the proposed fence must be installed for safety reasons and was requested by their insurance carrier. The proposal consists a green metal "topiary" fence that will be installed within an existing brick planting bed. Ms. Cooper stated that vines will be planted at the base of the fence to soften the appearance. Chris Greene asked what species of vines will be used for the fence. Ms. Cooper explained that they have proposed English Ivy. • The Design Review Board members recommended approval of the application as submitted. Beverly Cooperative Bank (73-87 Lafayette Street) George Atkins, attorney for Beverly Cooperative, updated the members on the status of the project. He explained that the applicant has worked with the Department of Planning and Community Development, Zoning Board of Appeals, Planning Board, and various state agencies. He explained that there are some site issues that restrict additional landscape planting. He also explained that the applicant was not interested in changing the footprint of the building. Chris Green inquired about the ZBA variance for the drive-thru use. Mr. Atkins explained that they had requested relief from the ZBA for the drive-thru. Mr. Atkins also stated that the applicant has provided detailed marketing information regarding the need for a drive-thru at this location. At this time, Mr. Atkins distributed a summary of this research to the DRB members. The engineer for the project presented the updated site plan to the DRB members. He explained that the circuitous vehicle circulation would discourage cut-through traffic. He also stated that the new site plan includes additional parking lot lighting and building lighting. The architectural changes include a more direct alignment for the semi-public passageway, new bay windows and trellis structures at the rear elevation. He also stated that the all of the • brickwork would be repointed and that a new brick fagade would replace the existing Earley building facade. Design Review Board Wednesday, December 4, 2002 Page I of I Mr. Giard asked if the material at the rear of the building was stucco. The engineer explained • that portions of the rear facade would be stucco. Mr. Green stated that a light colored stucco would not be effective and that a single mass of brick would be more effective. Mr. Durand and Mr. Giard agreed that brick would be preferred. David Payne, landscape architect, presented the updated landscaping plans to the Board. He outlined the difficult site constraints. He explained that they have included a series of landscape mounds to avoid the underground utilities. Mr. Payne pointed out the location of the proposed vine-covered trellis structures and stated that the interior walkways would consist of colored concrete. Mr. Durand asked Mr. Payne what kind of trees would be installed near Derby Street. Mr. Payne stated that they are proposing Flowering Pear trees at that location. Mr. Giard inquired about the option of shifting the alignment of the walkway near Derby Street to accommodate a continuous row of trees. Mr. Greene stated that the narrow strip between the walkway and the adjacent parking lot is insufficient and that there should be a more significant buffer. Mr. Durand inquired about fencing for the site. Mr. Payne stated that no fencing had been proposed for the site but a raised granite curb may be used to protect pedestrians. • Mr. Green stated that colored concrete should not be used for the walkways. He suggested the use of concrete pavers as an alternative. Mr. Giard stated that a direct pedestrian connection from the harbor walk to the community room should be considered. Mr. Green agreed that a direct path connection should be included from the harbor walk to the community room and added that a handicap ramp should be included adjacent to the community room. Mr. Green asked why the community room was not adjacent to the semi-public passageway. Mr. Giard stated that the additional glazing at the rear of the building would help connect the building to the waterfront. He also suggested that the applicant provide a more significant community room entrance at the rear of the building. Mr. Green suggested that the applicant extend the planting bed adjacent to the public parking area and that an additional tree should be included at this location. David Payne stated that he would investigate this further. Mr. Giard stated that the inclusion of a decorative cross walk would enhance the pedestrian • connection from the public passageway to the river. Mr. Payne stated that he would investigate this further. Design Review Board Wednesday, December 4, 2002 Page 2 of 2 Mr. Giard suggested that he had concerns over the height gg e ght of the landscape mounds. He stated • that once these mounds are planted, they have the potential of block views of the river and that there are potential safety concerns from the lack of visibility. Mr. Green and Mr. Durand did not have concerns with the height or location of the landscape mounds. Peabody Essex Museum (Essex Street) Will Phippin, from the Peabody Essex Museum, introduced Greg Liakos and John Roll and stated that the museum will be focusing on the "campus" signage for the project. Mr. Roll outlined the changes that were made to the plans. He explained that the map displays- had been removed from this phase and that the height, size and placement of the free-standing banners had been changed. Mr. Roll stated that the height of the banners has been reduced from 30' to 26' and that the spacing of the banners along Hawthorne Boulevard has been increased to mitigate their impact on the existing historical resources. Mr. Green stated that the placement of the banners along the Essex Mall would be appropriate. He stated that similar sized banners had been installed at the Christian Science Center in Boston. Mr. Durand stated that the new location and height of the banners along Hawthorne Street were an improvement. He suggested that the height of all the banners should be reduced. Mr. Green • and Mr. Giard agreed that the height should be reduced from 30' to 26'. Mr. Giard pointed out that the site plan had been adjusted to accommodate the new signage. He stated that approved landscaping plan indicated two shade trees at the location of the proposed free-standing signage on the Essex Mall. He explained that these trees had either been relocated or removed. Mr. Phippin stated that the trees had been shifted further down the Essex pedestrian mall. Mr. Giard stated that he had concerns over the removal or relocation of those trees. He stated that the trees would have helped mitigate the height of the project and give the pedestrian mall a better sense of enclosure. Mr. Green stated that he did not have concerns with the new tree locations. Mr. Giard stated that the DRB could not make a recommendation until the Board of Appeals had reviewed the project. He stated that the City would work with the applicant to expedite their application. City Hall Window Box (93 Washington Street) Kimberly Alexander, from the Peabody Essex Museum, presented a proposal for two decorative wrought iron window boxes for City Hall. Ms. Alexander explained that the new window boxes . will be installed along the Washington Street fagade and will replace the existing deteriorated window boxes. She explained that the proposed window boxes are 42" long x 12" deep x 10 Design Review Board Wednesday, December 4, 2002 Page 3 of 3 inches high, with decorative balconettes in front of each box. The proposed window boxes will • be constructed of wrought iron and will be black in color. Mr. Green stated that he did not feel that an ornate design treatment was appropriate for the fagade. He stated that the Greek Revival fagade has a strong simplicity that would not be compatible with a decorative feature. He stated that a more understated design would be more appropriate. Ms. Alexander stated that they could investigate additional alternatives. Bowman Building (266 Essex Street) An architect from H.H. Morant Architects presented the revised submittal to the DRB. The revised plans include a detailed landscaping plan and parking plan, fence details, planting details and light fixture details. A window sample was also presented to the Board. Mr. Green inquired about the plant quantities and requested that they be shown on the final plan. The applicant agreed to provide this information. Having no other comments, the DRB commended the applicant on their efforts to address their concerns. Mr. Giard informed the applicant that the final recommendation would be contingent on the submittal of the additional information. Heritage Bank (35 St. Peter Street) • Paul Bourbeau, architect for the project, presented the schematic proposal to the DRB. Mr. Bourbeau stated that Heritage Bank has leased a portion of the former New England Telephone Building on St. Peter. The proposal includes a new drive-thru, revised parking lay-out, a new entrance along Federal Street and landscaping. Mr. Bourbeau explained that the treatment of the new entrance does not match the other entrance along Federal Street, which is under construction. He stated he felt their proposal was compatible with the other entrance. Mr. Green stated that the drive-thru lane conflicted with the adjacent parking. He stated that cars would not be able to by-pass the drive-thru lane. He suggested the elimination of some or all of the parking spaces adjacent to the drive-thru. Mr. Bourbeau agreed that the elimination of the parking spaces would improve the plan. He stated that he could revise the plans accordingly. Mr. Durand stated that he felt the new entrance was an improvement over the other entrance on Federal Street. He stated that he had no issue with the different architectural treatments for the two entrances. Mr. Green and Mr. Giard agreed that the different treatments were acceptable. Mr. Green inquired about the handicap ramp for the new entrance. He suggested that the applicant reconfigure the ramp to eliminate the need for a railing. Mr. Bourbeau agreed with the concept and stated that he would investigate this further. Mr. Giard thanked Mr. Bourbeau for his schematic presentation, outlined the review process and requested updated drawings for the next DRB meeting. • There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. Design Review Board Wednesday, December 4, 2002 Page 4 of 4 e, Salem ® Redevelopment Authority Design Review Board Meeting Agenda October 30, 2002 Roll Call: Paul Durand Chris Green David Jaquith Fred Johnson Don Giard Projects • 1. Edgewater Cafe (155 Washington Street) —Review of Proposed Signage and Paint colors 2. City Hall—(93 Washington Street) —Schematic Review of Proposed Elevator 3. Elixer (230 Essex Street) —Review of Proposed Sign 4. Odell Block (Washington Street) —Review of Proposed Paint Colors 5. Bowman's Bakery (266 Essex Street) —Continuation of Design Review (Final Submission phase) 6. Peabody Essex Museum—(Essex Street) —Review of Proposed Signage Program 7. Peabody Essex Museum—(Essex Street) —Review of Proposed Landscaping and Fa4ade Treatment 8. Beverly Cooperative Bank (New Derby Street) —Schematic Review • 120 Washington Street • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 • Design Review Board Meeting Summary - 10/30/02 1. City Hall- (93 Washington Street) - Proposed Elevator Approval of Schematic Design w/ the condition that the architect investigate alternative for handicap ramp design to avoid the removal of an existing tree. 2. Bowman's Bakery (266 Essex Street) - Continuation of Design Review (Final Submission phase) Continued—DRB was pleased with the progress of the project;asked to Provide additional information on window details and alternative Specifications;David Jaquith and Paul Durand had concerns over the use of storm windows;Paul Durand suggested using Pella architectural windows and David Jaquith disagreed (applicant requested to investigate alternatives and come back to the DRB); Chris Green suggested that the applicant provide shingle details and a detailed landscape plan with the surrounding context; Chris Green also requested that an additional tree be included at the rear of the property (the applicant agreed to provide this information and agreed to include an additional tree if space permitted);Mr. Giard requested • that the applicant provide a trash enclosure detail, lighting plan, lighting details and signage plans for the next meeting. 3. Peabody Essex Museum - (Essex Street) - Proposed Signage Program Continued—DRB member were satisfied with the design concept but had concerns over the installation of banners at the Brown/Hawthorne intersection (adjacent to the Roger Conant statue);Paul Durand requested that the applicant use 1/4" instead of 1/8" aluminum for sign frames; Chris Green requested that the applicant confirm that the highway sign meets the requirements of the Manual for Uniform Traffic Control Devices (may not be able to include "Salem" on sign); DRB recommended the inclusion of Witch Trial Memorial in the signage program 4. Peabody Essex Museum - (Essex Street) -Landscaping/ Marine Art Gallery Continued—All DRB members present were in agreement that landscape screening in itself was not an acceptable solution;Paul Durand stated that he would not be willing to give a positive recommendation for the wall in its current condition. Paul Durand suggested that an alternative building material be used and requested that the applicant work with the owner of Marine Arts Gallery to come up with alternatives for the treatment of the building. Chris Green stated that he agreed with Mr. Durand. Will Phippen • stated that the Peabody Essex Museum had attempted to work with the owner of Marine Arts Gallery and that they had offered numerous • alternatives,including brick, but have not been able to reach an agreement with Mr. Kiernan. Mr. Phippen stated that the issue is currently under litigation. Mr. Phippen stated that there are a few additional items that the Peabody Essex will be submitting to the DRB. These items include a trash can specification and a photometric study for the site lighting. Mr. Phippen distributed an updated landscaping plan to the DRB and Chris Green offered to review the plan in more detail. 5. Edgewater Cafe (155 Washington Street) - Proposed Signage and Paint colors Positive recommendation w/ condition that applicant submit specification for iron sign bracket 6. Elixer (230 Essex Street) -Proposed Sign Positive recommendation - approve as submitted 7. Odell Block (Washington Street) - Proposed Paint Colors Continued- site visit will be coordinated to view paint samples 8. Beverly Cooperative Bank (New Derby Street) - Schematic Review Continued-DRB had significant concerns over the site plan and the lack of meaningful open space shown on the plans; Paul Durand and Chris Green suggested the potential elimination of the drive-thru to provide more space • for public use; Fred Johnson and Chris Green suggested the reconfiguration of the corner of the building to shift the drive-thru away from the river (allowing more space for landscaping while providing a more functional interior lay-out); Chris Green suggested shifting the location of drive-thru window to provide more open space;Paul Durand and Chris Green suggested the elimination of one of the drive-thru lanes;all members requested that the applicant investigate the elimination of some or all parking spaces; Chris Green suggested additional tree planting (find creative ways to avoid utility constraints wherever possible);Don Giard suggested the modification of the public passage to create a mote direct connection to the waterfront; Fred Johnson asked the applicant to consider locating the community room adjacent to the public passage area; Don Giard suggested that the project orient itself toward the waterfront by providing additional windows at the side and rear of the community room and by providing a more welcoming entrance along the rear of the building for the bank and the community room, and that the applicant should consider pedestrian traffic coming from the river; Don Giard requested that the applicant reconsider the use of landscaping berms to minimize the blocking of views to the river and to avoid potential safety concerns from poor visibility along the public walkway; Chris Green stated that he felt the landscape berms could help block views of the parking area; George Atkins stated that the drive-thru was critical to the success of the bank and a major reason for the site selection; Mr. Atkins stated that the bank would not acquire the Mass Electric parcel if • the drive-thru was not allowed by the City; Mr.Atkins requested that the DRB meet with the SRA to resolve the drive-thru before they continue any • further; Mr. Giard recommended that the applicant investigate the site planning suggestions made by Fred Johnson and Chris Green and that these suggestions may alleviate some of the circulation and open space concerns. • • Salem 171 un Redevelopment Authority DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Meeting Agenda September 25, 2002 Roll Call: Paul Durand Chris Green David Jaquith Fred Johnson Projects • 1. Taste of Thyme (Washington Street) —Review of proposed signage • One Salem Green • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Meeting Agenda September 25, 2002 Roll Call: Paul Durand Chris Green David Jaquith Fred Johnson Projects • 1. Edgewater Cafe (155 Washington Street) —Proposed exterior alteration to rear of building 2. Salem YMCA (Barton Square) —Review of proposed signage 3. Taste of Thyme (Washington Street) —Review of proposed signage 4. Elixir (Essex Street) —Review of proposed signage • r e , Salem Redevelopment Authority DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Meeting Agenda August 28, 2002 Roll Call: Paul Durand Chris Green David Jaquith Fred Johnson Projects • 1. Bowman's Bakery Building (266 Essex Street) —Continuation of Schematic Review 2. Asahi Restaurant (168 Essex Street) —Review of proposed signage and awning 3. Roosevelts (300 Derby Street) —Review of proposed lighting, entrance, awnings and window boxes. 4. Salem Five (210 Essex Street) —Review of proposed hanging sign i, i+ye. � ttA/If'ti VOIiA$Lt�/�yj.l Z. zo One Salem Green • Salem, Massaehnsetts 01970 a 978) 745-9595, Ext 311 ^ Fax (978) 740-0404 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Preliminary Meeting Agenda July 31, 2002 Roll Call: Paul Durand Chris Green David Jaquith Fred Johnson Projects • 1. Bowman's Bakery Building (266 Essex Street) —Continuation of Schematic Review 2. Museum Place Garage (1 New Liberty Place) —Review of proposed signage and removal of existing awning 3. Deleo's Pizza (28 Norman Street) —Review of proposed landscaping and fencing improvements 4. Brothers Cafe (245 Derby Street) —Review of proposed hanging sign • 1 res Salem Redevelopment Authority DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Preliminary Meeting Agenda June 26, 2002 Roll Call: Paul Durand Chris Green David Jaquith Fred Johnson Minutes: Approve minutes for meeting held on April 24,2002 and May 29, 2002 Projects 1. South River Harbor Walk (South River) —Preliminary review 2. Bowman's Bakery Building (266 Essex Street) —Continuation of Design Review 3• Biscotti Cuccina (231 Washington Street) —Application for Outdoor Cafe Permit 4• Sea Lion (10 Front Street) —Application for Outdoor Cafe Permit 5. Sea Lion (10 Front Street) —Application for New Sign 6• Essex Street—Catherine Gagnon condominium (Essex Street) — Application for new dormer window/replacement windows 7. Gagnon's Shoe Repair (New Derby Street) —Application for New Sign 8. Century 21 (207 Washington Street) —Application for New Sign 9• Corporate Connection (Washington Street) —Sign Application 10. Minit Print(79 Washington Street) —Sign Application 11. The Magic Parlor (213 Essex Street) —Review of new hanging sign and window signage • 12. Brothers Cafe (245 Derby Street) —Application for Outdoor Cafe Permit One Salem Green • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 eSalem UM Redevelopment Authority DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 5/29/02 MEETING AGENDA 1. Former New England Telephone Building (35 St. Peters Street) — Proposed construction of entrance portico and proposed installation of replacement windows 2. Bowman's Bakery Building (226 Essex Street) — Schematic Design Review for proposed building and fagade improvements 3. Papa Johns Pizza (233 Washington Street) —Application for proposed sign 4. Biscotti Cuccina (231 Washington Street) — Revised sign application • 5. Maria's Sweet Somethings (26 Front Street) — Proposed outdoor cafe 6. Your Last Chance (185-189 Essex Street) — Proposed outdoor cafe 7. Roosevelt's (300 Derby Street) — Proposed building improvements and outdoor cafe • One Salem Green • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 • Design Review Board Minutes of the Meeting Wednesday, May 1, 2002 5:30 p.m. The Design Review Board met in open session on Wednesday, May 1, 2002 at 5:30 p.m. in the third floor conference room at 120 Washington Street. Those in attendance were: Paul Durand, Don Giard, and Chris Greene. Salem Main Streets Window Box Proeram Ms. Debra Greel, Project Coordinator for the Salem Main Streets Downtown District, presented an application for three, standardized window box design for a program Main Streets is developing for downtown merchants. She continued that volunteers from the Council on Aging are going to construct the boxes which merchants will be able to purchase through Main Streets. She hopes that the program will be able to expand into a four seasons program. Mr. Durand asked what color the window boxes would be. Ms. Greel responded that the regulations for the Historic Commission state a window box could match the body or trim • color of the house. She continued that she would welcome suggestions by the Board regarding a standardized color. Mr. Durand stated that there should be a limited pallet of color selections such as dark green and black. Mr. Greene stated that in order to make it clear that this is a City-wide program the boxes should all be the same color. Mr. Greene recommended that the color be dark green. Mr. Durand asked what material the bracket would be. Ms. Greel responded that it would be wood or metal. Mr. Greene asked where the stand-alone boxes would be used. Ms. Greel stated this option was designed for buildings that had glass fronts with no place to attach a box. Mr. Greene responded that if a building has glass all the way to the sidewalk it would be a contemporary building, and window boxes are typically for older building styles. He also felt that the placement of a stand-alone box could cause pedestrian access problems and felt that if this option was chosen by a business it should be reviewed on a case-by-case basis by the DRB. Mr. Greene asked if Main Streets could do an inventory listing what businesses would require using this window box option. Ms. Greel responded that she would identify such sites. • • Mr. Durand asked when the window box on the stand would be used. Ms. Greel responded that this option was developed for businesses whose building owners would not allow them to drill into the storefronts. Mr. Greene expressed his concern that the stands might not be sturdy enough. Mr. Durand recommended bracing be used. Ms. Greel agreed to add bracing. Mr. Giard asked what type of wood the boxes would be constructed of. Ms. Greel responded pine would be used. Mr. Greene stated that window boxes can have a great impact just like a sign and he was willing to approve the program with the Type A & B boxes. Mr. Durand made a motion to approve the application to permit window boxes in the downtown with the standard Type A & B box, with bracing added to the Type B box and that a final color sample be submitted. He further motioned that Type C box will need to be approved on a case-by-case basis. Mr. Greene seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Pamplemousse—99 Washington Street—Sign Application Ms. Dianne Manahan presented an application to erect a 3'4" x 31/2", right angle sign. • The sign will be carved with a natural wood background. The letters will be white and the cutting board will be two shades of brown and the grapefruit will have a yellow outside and a salmon color inside. The sign will hang from a black metal bracket, eight feet from grade, in the center between the first and second window to the left of the entrance. Mr. Greene stated that the lettering on the bottom of the sign should read straight across and not curved as it is shown. He continued that the curving of the word 'Pamplemousse'should match the curve of the oval on the sign and there should be more spacing between the letters. Ms. Manahan showed the Board the color samples chosen for the sign and informed the Board that the Main Streets program has approved the sign. Mr. Durand pointed out that the name of the business is not centered on the submitted drawing and he expressed his concern regarding the color choices. He requested that the applicant provide a more accurate rendition of the sign with actual colors. Ms. Manahan pointed out that the colors she has chosen for the sign are the same colors she is using inside her store. Ms. Manahan asked the Board if she would have to wait until the next DRB meeting. Mr. Durand stated that the new drawing could be shown to the members individually for • approval. Mr. Giard stated that he would distribute the new drawing as soon as she made the changes. • Mr. Greene made a motion to approve sign with the conditions that the curve of the name should match the curve of the interior oval and be centered; there be more spacing between the letters in Pamplemousse and it be centered on the sign; the Home Kitchen Bath wording not be curved; and actual color samples be submitted. Mr. Durand seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Wire for Hire—24 Hawthorne Boulevard— Sign Application Mr. Bruce Whear appeared before the Board with an application for a right angle sign on the corner of the building at 24 Hawthorne Boulevard. The sign is 2' x T and is 9' from grade. The sign is rectangular and on a white background with black lettering and a red and gold/yellow logo. Mr. Whear thanked Mr. Giard for his assistance in finalizing the sign application. Mr. Greene recommended that there be a black or red border around the sign. Mr. Whear agreed to use a black border. Mr. Greene recommended that there should be 1" of white and 1" of black border around the three sides of the sign and only a %" of white border and 1" of black border on the bottom of the sign. Mr. Whear asked if the Board would allow indirect lighting to the sign. Mr. Greene stated that the Board would review a plan. Mr. Durand stated that he preferred to see the sign non-illuminated, but a lighting scheme could be submitted at another time. • Mr. Greene made a motion to approve the application with the condition that a black border be drawn around the sign, allowing for 1" of white background and 1" of black border around the sign except for the bottom, where there should only be ''/z" of white border. Let's Pretend—285 Derby Street—Facade Renovation and Sign Application Mr. Robert Pierce presented his plans to construct a roof and chimney in the in-fill panel of his building with MDF board. The roof will be white with gray trim. The second portion of his application is for a sign 25.5" x 106.5" in the sign panel above the roof area. The sign is red, white, blue and yellow, as shown. Mr. Greene stated that the top of the area should be treated as a sign and not part of the fagade work and suggested the sign be put on top of the fagade work. He also asked for a sample of the gray paint color proposed. Mr. Greene made a motion to approve the application as presented with the condition that the gray paint color be submitted. Mr. Giard seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Troisi's— 140 Washington Street— Sign& Awning Application Teresa and Federico Troisi appeared before the Board with an application for a 2' x3' • right angle sign on the corner of the building, two green fabric awnings with an 8" loose • valance with the name of the restaurant in white, and for five black metal goose neck lighting fixtures. The owners also requested that the wood panel outside be painted and scraped and repainted with 'Hearts of Palm' (color sample submitted). Ms. Troisi also requested that the bottom storefront panels be replaced with ceramic tile and a decorative iron flower railing be added. Mr. Greene stated that the lettering in the sign is a little to cramped and the letters be made smaller. Mr. Durand expressed his concern for the decorative iron railing feature and requested that a detailed drawing including a section detail to see the depths be provided. Mr. Greene commented that this storefront might not be the right place for this iron railing. Mr. Greene made a motion to approve the sign, awning, lighting and painting of panels as presented. Mr. Durand seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. The Board did not take any action on the tile and metal railing. They requested that a • more detailed plan be submitted. HESS Gas Station—Continuation of Plan Review Attorney Phil Lombardo, Frank Livingston, and Luke DiStefano appeared before the DRB with revisions to the plans, based on the previous DRB meeting. Mr. DiStefano first showed the Board the landscaping revision to the access from Derby Street to the Harbor Walk and the change that produced pedestrian access to all four sides of the building. He then showed landscaping changes, which included the addition of Oak& Linden trees, and denser landscaping to prohibit cut through by the South River side. He stated that HESS is still working with the City and will adhere to the City's standards for fencing, lighting, benches, etc. He also showed the new landscaping strip on the Derby Street fagade where there will be concrete bollards and chain fencing. At this time, Mr. DiStefano showed the building elevations explaining how the roofline has been brought down to better reflect New England style architecture and the standard, HESS checkerboard green and white pattern has been changed to a solid color green. He also stated that the bricks have been pulled out on the corners of the building to create a column feel, per a Planning Board suggestion, to better anchor the building. Mr. Greene stated that this is vast improvement to the original plan that was submitted, and his only comment was that he did not have a problem with the signage being the • HESS green color but he would like to see the building green be a darker green color. • Mr. Durand stated that he agreed with Mr. Greene's comment that the green be a deeper green, and asked the developer to submit a brick sample, a shingle sample, a paint sample, and a mortar color sample. Mr. Greene requested that a sample panel be made before construction begins. Mr. Giard asked if the Hess Express logo could be placed lower or on the building. Mr. Greene and Mr. Durand stated that the developer did scale the logo back, and had no problem with the placement as shown. At this time, Attorney Lombardo stated that he hoped this project could receive approvals today, so he can report to the Planning Board that the DRB process has been completed. He continued that this project needs to have all local approvals in place before the State permit process can begin. Mr. Greene asked where there will be new curbing and its material. Mr. DiStefano showed the new curb on the site and stated it will be a 6" concrete curb. Mr. Greene then responded that he would like to see granite curbing, stating that concrete doesn't hold up as well as granite and concrete does not really look urban. Mr. Greene asked Mr. DiStefano to review grading plans. Mr. DiStefano responded that • the grading needs to be looked at further, as it is clear there is a difference between the HESS property and the Coastal Gas Station property, and is not definitive at this time. Mr. Greene responded that since the grading plan is not finalized, the site plan cannot be approved, but the site layout can be. He continued that if the 6" curb shown turns out to be a 12" curb,then this would be a significant design change. Mr. DiStefano stated that it was his understanding, based on discussions he has had with Mr. Walsh,that this issue did not need to be finalized at this time, and stated his concern that he did not want this approval held up. Mr. Greene asked for a plant list, and a detail of the bollard and chain. He then asked what would surround the garbage dumpster. Mr. DiStefano stated the trash enclosure will vinyl materials and be surrounded by landscaping. Mr. Greene stated the fence should be wood and painted dark green. Mr. Giard requested that the shrubs (right, rear of property) be removed and replaced with grass. Mr. Greene continued that a chain and bollard be used on the corner or dense landscaping. Mr. Lombardo stated that that could be done, but he would like to reserve the right to not make it required, because the State needs to render a decision, as this portion is by the Harbor Walk. At this time, Mr. Durand made a motion to approve the plans dated 8/14/01 with • revisions dated 1/15/02 and 2/26/02 with the following conditions: . Green be darker green and final color be submitted Brick sample be submitted Roof shingle sample be submitted Mortar color be submitted A sample panel be submitted before construction New curb to be constructed of granite Grading plan be submitted Detail of bollard & chain be submitted Trash enclosure doors be stockade wood and painted dark green Remove shrub area on the rear right of property and replace with grass Construct chain and bollard fence on the corner of the dense landscaping area in the left rear of property (If State allows such a fence) - If fence is constructed, some shrubs may be removed and grass area around them be expanded. Final plant list be submitted. Mr. Greene seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Old Police Station Jack French appeared before the DRB to review the revisions requested by the Board. He began with showing the planting plan revisions. He informed the Board that Sarah • Barton, landscape consultant has also been involved in the plant selection. The new plant selection by the entrance includes the use of. magnolia, vinca, and Japanese holly hedging behind the iron fence. He stated the Pin Oak tree and Norway Maple will be used in the rear of the building and lower plant material by Red's will be used. Mr. Greene commented that the space around the Pin Oak by the rear entrance may not be big enough. Mr. French stated he would take a look at this, and that he may be able to move the tree back and open up the curve to make a bigger space. He also expressed his concern regarding the Norway Maple and suggested that a red leaf tree like a Red Maple Sour Wood be used. Mr. French responded that he would research this. Mr. Giard asked about the curbing in the rear. Mr. French stated that concrete curing around the entry will be used and the parking area will be flush. Mr. Greene stated that curbing needs to be used in the parking area, especially to protect the trees, and he asked why granite was not chosen. Mr. French responded that granite was not used because of its expense, but stated he would use granite if the Board requires. Mr. French then showed the Board the window and color samples. Mr. Giard asked about wall lighting. Mr. French stated that a good, vandal proof light will be used in the walkway between Red's and lights will be used on the roof decks. Mr. Giard asked that details of these lights be provided to the Board. • At this time, Mr. French informed the Board that he has had a few inquiries from artists regarding the loft spaces. • Mr. Giard asked if signage has been decided for the site. Mr. French stated that no signage has been finalized, and would like to deal with that as a separate issue at a latter date. At this time, Paul Durand made a motion to approve the plans for the Old Police Station project with the conditions that the landscape changes talked about today be made, the granite curbing be added and a paint board sample and lighting sample board be submitted. Mr. Greene seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Ellen S. Dubinsky Secretary • • April 10, 2002 Joseph P. Walsh, Jr. Executive Director Salem Redevelopment Authority 120 Washington Street, 3`d Floor Salem, MA 01970 RE: Proposed amendment to Town House Square Project(228 Essex Street) Dear Mr. Walsh: Please accept this letter as our request to amend our application dated January 24, 2002, to bring our project located at 228 Essex Street into compliance with Salem Redevelopment Authority regulations. Specifically, we request the following modifications to our project application: 1. The installation of 13 aluminum-clad Trimline replacement windows along the east elevation of the building (see attached plan and specifications). • 2. The installation of six (6) aluminum-clad Trimline replacement windows along the north elevation of the building (see attached plan and specifications). 3. The restoration and repair of the remaining 9 windows along the north elevation of the building as previously approved. As outlined in the previous application, the restoration of these windows will include repair of existing sills and sashes, and repair of broken or missing window panes (see attached). We understand that any future changes or modifications to our application must be reviewed and approved by the Salem Redevelopment Authority prior to construction. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (978) 430-1498. Si 1 David A. Pabich, P.E. Manager Salem Renewal, LLC • Real Estate Revitalization April 9, 2002 Salem Redevelopment Authority e . 220 Washington Street Salem, MA 01970 Subject: •101 Washington Street/ 228 Essex Street Town House Square Facade Improvements As the Board is aware,Salem Renewal LLC is currently renovat- ing the property located at 101 Washington Street /228 Essex Street, Salem. As described in a letter to the Board dated Oc- tober 1, 2001,we are progressing on the facade improvements , in phases. The first phase, restoration of the top three stories of the structure, has been substantially completed. In order to proceed with the second phase, the historical resto- ration of the ground floor storefronts,Salem Renewal requests permission to begin exploratory demolition on the storefronts at 99 and 101 Washington Street. This demolition will allow us to ascertain the extent to which the original architectural detail 4 $ " remains below existing paneling. It is Salem Renewal's intent to g pa g. H: f ­ restore these storefronts to a condition very similar to their his- toric origins. panel- inscured by existing G � a ing is under understood, So ethe condition fm Renewal willthe facade presentpre ennt the Board with `r detailed information on materials and construction techniques to be used in the renovation of these storefronts. Please feel free to contact me at 978 430-1498 if there are any questions or concerns regarding this request. � r Sin S lem Re a., LLC e$ avid A. Pabich, P.E. Manager r5 W. F' Q Salem LLj Redevelopment Authority DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA WEDNESDAY, APRIL 3, 2002 5:30 p.m. Roll Call: Paul Durand Donald Giard Chris Greene David Jaquith Fred Johnson Agenda: 1. Biscotti Cuccina—231 Washington Street—Amendment to Sign Application 2. Wire for Hire—24 Hawthorne Boulevard— Sign Application 3. Townhouse Square—228 Essex Street—Window Replacement North& East Elevations 4. Proposed Meeting Schedule for 2002 esd\drb\agenda • One Salem Green • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 re Salem Redevelopment Authority DRB RECOMMENDATION (from meeting held April 3,2002) Town House Square— 101 Washington/228 Essex Streets—Facade Modifications Mr. Richard Pabich appeared before the DRB on January 31, 2002, with an application (see attached) for three modifications to the building. The DRB responded favorably to the application, but had concerns regarding materials, and requested catalog cuts and specifications for the new doors and window being proposed. Catalog cuts were received and reviewed by the DRB members. Because of concern expressed by the members regarding the design compatibility of the proposed aluminum clad TrimLine replacement window, a DRB site visit to the property was scheduled. At the site visit held on March 15, 2002, it was discovered by DRB members that replacement windows had been installed in approximately 13 window openings along the east elevation of the building, and six replacement windows had been installed on the north elevation of the building. Since none of this work had been reviewed or approved by the SRA, the project was determined to be in violation of the Heritage Plaza East Urban Renewal Plan. The applicant was made aware of the violation and was asked to appear before the DRB at their next meeting. At the DRB meeting held on April 3, 2002, David Pabich appeared before the Board with a request to amend the original application (see attached amendment to application) to allow all of the replacement windows to remain on the east elevation and the six replacement windows on the north elevation. DRB RECOMMENDATION: Approve application and amendment as submitted. No other work is covered by this decision; all other proposed work to be done must be approved by the SRA. One Salem Green • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (978) 745-95957 Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 ASalem Redevelopment Authority DRB RECOMMENDATION (from meeting held April 3, 2002) Town House Square—Request for Exploratory Demolition Mr. Pabich submitted an application requesting permission to perform exploratory demolition at 101 Washington Street to determine the extent to which the original architectural details remain underneath the brown paneling above the storefront on the west elevation of the building (Washington Street fagade). DRB RECOMMENDATION: Approve application for exploratory demolition with the condition that storefront panels be re-installed immediately after exploration or that a proposed renovation plan be • immediately submitted for DRB review. • One Salem Green • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 r a Salem Redevelopment Authority DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 2002 5:00 p.m. Roll Call: Paul Durand Donald Giard Chris Greene David Jaquith • Fred Johnson Agenda: 1. Old Police Station—Continuation of Review Process (Updated Plans Enclosed) 2. Peabody Essex Museum—Discussion of Proposed Changes to Approved Plan 3. Town House Square—Review and Approval of Final Specifications for Doors & Windows 4. Brother's Cafe—South Harbor Garage—Approval of Sign Application esd\drb\agenda • One Salem Green • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 • Design Review Board Minutes of the Meeting Thursday, February 28, 2002 5:00 p.m. The Design Review Board met in open session on Thursday, February 28, 2002 at 5:00 p.m. in the third floor conference room at 120 Washington Street. Those in attendance were: Don Giard, Chris Greene, and Dave Jaquith. Old Police Station Mr. Jack French began the presentation by review the site plan and pointing out some alterations. He stated that there are 15 full size parking spaces, and the access to the rear of the abutters' buildings will remain the same. He pointed out that the trees in the rear near Red's have been changed to dwarf trees and the Japanese Maple in the front has been moved forward. He continued that a meeting was held with the realtors and based on their marketing experience it was decided to keep the decks on the front penthouses. They felt that it would be more difficult to market the units if they did not have decks, especially since all the other units include decks. Mr. French informed the Board that the two front units are still being proposed to house artist live and work space, pointing out that the work/storage space in the lower level has been increased for that purpose. • Mr. French then showed the Board larger details of the new balustrade and stated the penthouse material will be copper. He then showed the Board a section through the mansard portion of the carriage house. He continued that a slate look, fish scaled design shingle will be used, but the specific material has not been chosen yet, and the flat roof will have a copper flashing detail. Mr. French showed the Board the redesign of the rear main entrance, stating this new design was based on the comments of the last DRB meeting. He revised the awning to be constructed of steel with a copper roof. Mr. Jaquith stated he was pleased with the new stronger looking design. Mr. Greene asked if they has been any alteration to the pedestrian passage way. Mr. French stated that the existing detail of the doorway will be replicated or restored. A final decision has not been made. Mr. Jaquith pointed out the side view of the windows on the mansard are not shown on the plan. Mr. French responded that he will submit that view at the next meeting. Mr. Giard asked if Mr. French had a set of plans depicting the existing conditions of the building. Mr. French responded that he has the original builders plans, but in some instances, the building was not actually built as shown on the plan. Mr. Giard stated that it is difficult to tell what is new and what is original and asked that the architect submit an • • existing condition plan for the file. Mr. French stated that all of the openings, window configurations, etc. are all existing on the main building. Mr. French pointed out that the window wells on the side of the main building near Red's are going to be infilled. Mr. Greene commented regarding the plant selection on the site plan. He pointed out that the paper birch/white bark tree specified is subject to disease and suggested that a light gray birch be used. He also asked that the variety of the Japanese Maple trees be specified, as there are numerous varieties. He also commented that the burning bush proposed might be too much for the building. Mr. French responded that he will prepare a detailed landscape plan for the project. Mr. Jaquith asked if there will a railing for the stairs at the pedestrian passage way. Mr. French responded that there will be new railings. Mr. Giard informed Mr. French that the new railing detail needs to be submitted Mr. Giard asked for the detail for the new iron fence on the front fagade, and asked how the curb line would be maintained and if there would be a gate. He also suggested that he plantings be put on the outside of the fence. Mr. French responded that a gate would be a good idea and he will study the placement of the plantings. • Mr. Giard asked where the handicap access for the building will be located. Mr. French responded that there is a handicap ramp at the rear entrance, which can be accessed through the rear driveway. Mr. Giard stated that he would like there to be handicap access directly from Central Street. Mr. Jaquith asked if the developer is required to have handicap parking. Mr. French responded that this size project does not require handicap parking. Mr. Giard asked how the parking lot edges will be defined. Mr. French responded that this is being worked on with the civil engineers and will be presented with the civil plans when they are completed. Mr. Giard also asked about lighting plans for the building. Mr. French responded that this will also be submitted with the civil drawings. Mr. Giard commented that he liked the choice of using all copper for the penthouse, but expressed that he would like to see more glass added to the penthouse. Mr. French responded that he disagreed with the suggestion to add more glass, stating that at night you would see lit-up glass, and it would act as bright signage. Mr. Giard then stated that he would like to have more shades and shadows in the penthouse portion of the building. Mr. French responded that the original plan did have more ins & outs, but when the Board asked for more symmetry between the penthouse and the existing building facade some of the building detail was removed. Mr. Giard asked if Mr. French would put back some slight variations in depths. Mr. French • responded that he would add pavilions to the penthouse to accomplish this request. • Mr. Giard asked if any of the existing windows would remain. Mr. French responded that all the windows would be replaced with the sample he showed the Board that has an exterior muntin and has been accepted by the National Park Service Department of the Interior for use in other historic buildings. At this time, Mr. French stated that he is proposing to plant some shade trees along the entrance to the parking area, if the Peabody Essex Museum does not have a plan for the rear of their property. Since representatives from the museum were present, they all agreed to meet with each other to coordinate plantings. Mr. Jaquith stated that this project has made very good progress and working drawings could be submitted to the Board. Mr. Luster asked the status of the project in terms of when the DRB would recommend this project for approval to the SRA. Mr. Giard responded that this project has passed the schematic review phase and the design development phase, and an approval could be given at the working drawing phase with a listing of conditions. Mr. Greene stated that if the working drawings are submitted at the next meeting, and were acceptable to the Board, he would feel comfortable sending a recommendation with conditions to the SRA. • Mr. French thanked the Board for their comments. Peabody Essex Museum—Alterations to Plan Will Phippen and Tor Utne from the Peabody Essex Museum presented drawing to the Board that reflect some minor changes to the landscaping plan. They also stated that some additional changes have been made which are not on this plan, but will be submitted. Mr. Phippen then outlined the changes which included a change in material to the bluestone paving, seating adjustments that substitute wooden benches with stone benches and the replacement of the curb and fence at Armory Park to create a low seating wall. Mr. Greene asked if there was a detail of the stone. Mr. Phippen then showed him the detail drawing. Mr. Greene then asked if there were more benches in Armory Park in the original plan. Mr. Phippen responded that there were more benches, but the new plans contain more seating capacity. Mr. Greene stated that his only concern between the wood and stone benches is that wooden benches have a back and felt that a backless stone bench would be less comfortable and will be cold. He stated that he did disagree with having less benches put felt there needs to be benches with backs. Mr. Greene then asked Mr. Phippen to explain the configuration changes made to New Liberty Street. Mr. Phippen showed the adjustments and curb changes along New • Liberty that resulted from meetings with the National Park Service and the City. • At this time, Mr. Phippen showed the Board a proposal for signage at the National Park Visitors Center. Mr. Greene and Mr. Jaquith stated that the sign proposal looked fine. Mr. Giard stated that the Board cannot approve the sign without the submission of a complete application which includes more details than what was just shown to the Board. Mr. Phippen then pointed out the change in the curb alignment on Essex Street, which was approved by the City Engineer. Mr. Phippen then showed the Board new flagpole locations at Armory Park. The two flags will be located by the monument. Mr. Giard suggested they be placed behind the wall, so they do not interfere with pedestrian circulation. Mr. Phippen pointed out a minor change in the paving detail underneath the arch. Mr. Greene concurred with this alteration. At this time, the Board tabled discussion on this matter to hear another applicant. Brothers Cafe— South Harbor Garage— Sign Application Mr. Giard explained that the sign for the Brothers Cafe was erected and the curve of the • awning was not matched, as was required by the DRB recommendation. Also, lights were installed above the sign that were not approved by the DRB and need to be removed. Mr. McTeague, sign maker, explained to the Board that he met with Mr. Durand and Mr. Giard at the site and it was decided that in order to rectify this, Mr. McTeague will trace the curve on site and cut the sign accordingly to match. The Board concurred with this corrective course of action. Mr. Giard informed the sign maker that a revised drawing and the removal of the lights need to happen on or before March 13. If these two conditions are met by then the DRB recommendation can be brought to the SRA at their scheduled March 13`x'meeting. Peabody Essex Museum—Continuation of Discussion Mr. Phippen informed the Board that it was determined that the amount of plantings in Armory Park would be too dense and some of the smaller trees were eliminated and larger trees will be substituted in slightly different locations, as shown. Mr. Greene stated that he concurred with the alterations presented this evening. Mr. Phippen then showed the Board a modification to the Charter street area. The • modification is being requested to accommodate Dr. Fisher's access to the parking area . by the Empire lot. The proposal calls for allowing the curb cut to remain and not continuing the fence along the specified location. Mr. Greene expressed his concern for the viability of plantings along the curb with no protection, and suggested a fence be just put in that specific area and ground cover instead of grass be used. He continued that any type of ground cover, except pacasandra, would be acceptable to him. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Ellen S. Dubinsky Secretary • • DAVID A. PABICH, P.E. • MANAGER Salem Renewal, LLC 7 Summer Street Salem,MA 01970 Phone: (978) 430-1498 January 24,2002 Salem Redevelopment Authority 220 Washington Street Salem, MA 01970 Subject: 101 Washington Street/ 228 Essex Street Town House Square North and East Facade Modifications Salem Renewal LLC is pleased to submit to the SRA the attached elevations for review. The modifications requiring approval are as follows: North Elevohon-There exists a door on the fourth floor of the building which opens out to the airspace above the alley between 101 Washington Street and • City Hall. The door was used to bring supplies into a commercial photography studio by way of a davit and hoist system. It appears that the door was not original to the structure, but was added in place of a window. Salem Renewal wishes to remove the door and restore the original appearance of the facade by installing a window and granite sill. The new window will match the existing windows on this facade. The style and type will be a one-over-one wood clad replacement window by TrimUne. East Elevation-The east side of the building faces a 5-foot wide alley. Across the alley is an abutting brick building. There exists an 8-inch concrete slab which spans the alley at the second floor level. There are two modifications on the east facade:The installation of a door on the ground level and the installation of a door on the second floor,out to the existing concrete slab. Ground Floor-The desired exit door on the ground floor will replace an existing window in the facade. As indicated on the East Elevation - Existing Conditions drawing,this window has been abandoned with concrete blocks. There is a vent which protrudes through the block. The concrete blocks and vent will be removed and the opening then extended down to meet grade. A solid panel exit door will be installed. Second Floor-The desired modification on the second floor is the installation of an exit door leading to the existing concrete slab. The door will be installed in the existing 9-foot tall window penetration. The granite sill will be removed and the opening extended down 18 inches. As indicated on the East Elevation - Proposed Conditions drawing, the existing non-operable upper portion of the • window will remain, and the door will be installed below. The door will be a solid glass panel exterior door,similar in appearance to the adjacent windows. Please feel free to contact me at 978 430-1498 if there are any questions or concerns regarding these submittals. Sincerely, alem ne�l f� ' f ` David A. Pabich, P.E. Manager • • c I•I .411°1l1i1l1�114r4r1r1r1441r1°r1r14rr1r14rHIM I IMr14r4r1°1r1141r141r144r41r141r14,r14�r14�r14�r141r14°r141r1°°r1I°°r1141r1°°r°I°Ir°1°1r°141r1°1r°I'Ir°1'1r°I'Ie°1•°1r°1°°r°1'1r11°1r1141r1°1r°1'°r°1°1e11•',r1I'lr1l°lr1l'lr1i'lr1,4lr,4ir,4lr,4lr,°lr1,4lr,4lr,4lr,4le,'4le,'1l °I°II III°I°� 11411 °1°III°III°I°I°I°III°III�1°III°I�1°I°111°III°I I° °i I,I,I, 11°I°I °I°I°II111°1111111°I°III°III°III°I°I°111111°I �y(��I144 'I��IIi������'I®�I°144"1444°14444444°I°I°°44°°4°I r. . . . . . III�I�I�1�1�1�1�1�1�I�1�1�11�1�1�1��I�I�IIII�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1��I�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�I�1�1�1�1�1111°I�1 II�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�hl�l�l�l�lol�l�lt11 � 111111°111°IIIII°III°I°1°1°111°1°111°IIIIIIIII°111°1�1�1�1�1�1�I�1�1�1�I�1�11°I°III°I I°III°IIIII°I I°III°I�I�I�I�I��1�1�1�1�11°I°111°I 1°11111 � 111, IIIL 1111. . . . . 11111111111111111111111 1,',r I,1,lIr 1I,I,Ir 1,,,,1,1,1,4441,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1 Ilii .'I■�li°i°i �■�III'I' 'I■� �X1111111'111'I'111''11''''I'IIIII''111111''1 1444444441,44444444441,41 I,1�� Ii44, i,�,�°� '�14444444444°,°1444441,441,41 H1;1;1;1;19;1;1;1�1',f,',f,,,',;,1,',;,',',1,',tp,�,','I,I,I,I,I,I,I,I11,I,I,I,I,I,I,I,I,I,I,I,1,1,1 1111°I I°I III°I I°�1II°IIIII°III I�I�I�i�l�l�l�l�l�l�l�l�l�l��I�Ijl�ll°I°I°I 1°I 1°1°1°I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�Ijljljljljljljllll°I°III°III°I°I 1II�I � I�I�I�1�,�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�IjI�I,I,I,I,I,i,l,l,l,l,l,l,l,l,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,11411111 111111111111111 I 1111 .1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1. 11.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1 '''''11.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1CHIMPS ',1,',',,,',1,',',�,',',�,�,�,�,�,�,�,�,�1�,� I'llC111II■� 1111II��I �� l'I°I°1°,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,11°III°III°I°I°I°1111 lll°III �IIIII° '1'1','lilillililililililili�ilililil i; i;i;�;�;�;�;�;�;�;o;�i��i�i ;i,�;ii;e;i;�;i;�;i;�;� ;� ;�; 1 111,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,111 11,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,141,1,1,1,1,I,1,1,1,1,I,I,I,I,Ide4�el1°III°I°I°I°I°I°III°III°I°I°I°I°111°I°I°III°I I,I,i1. 1,I,I,Ir IIII°II r'I■�1,1,1,1,1,1,11111,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,11°I°I 11I, 'L� 111 ' III 11 111111 11111111111111111 I III 11 I,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,11°I°I°I°I°111°I°I°III ,1,1� 11°1111 jl1,111 . ■ ■ , , , . . . . . . . .:1II°I°I°I°I°1114°I°I°III°111°I°I°I°111°I°I°I PI;PPPI!I;I! PP1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,I,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,11°III°III°III°1111111°IIIIIIIII°I°I°I°1111111°I 1;,;,;1;1;1;,;1;1;1;1;1;1;1;1;1;1;1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,11°1111111111111111111111111111 I,I,I11.I.e.l.l.l.l.l.l.e.1.1.1 , , 1111 1111111 I I I 1111111111111 I,HIMI,I,I,I,I,I,I,I,I,4°I°I°I°I°144111 '�'�'��I'!� 'I■�I'�II� 'I�� �I�I�iI til SII�i�il til l�'�i�i�ill SII I 111 , 11111111111111111111111 1'1'1'1.1•PI.1999.1•PI.1.1.1.1.1.1.19.1.1.1.1.1.1.199.1'1'1'1'1'1'1'1.1.199.1'1 1'1.1 Illtl'Illllltll111lllelll11t1111°I°I°I°e°IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII°IIIIIIIIIIIII1I1I1III1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 1 1 1 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII �111111.1.1.1.1.1_Ielele1e1.11111111.1.1.1.1.1_IIIII�I�I�I��e11111�144�1�1�1�1�1�1�14�1�1�1�^ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 r 1111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIfIIII III — 111111► llejelllllel111111111111111111111111I111I11111 Ill1111111lel 'I-�III1 IeI '��11 11 111111 1 1 1111111 1111 11\--1--1 —�I Illllllllllllelolelllll 44444444444411yyyllyyyylly 1111 ■ 1 Hill 11 1 ■ 11. 1 1 ■ 1 1 . 1 1 ■ ■ ■ JI11I1111 . . ■ . ■ ■ 1 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ . 1111'111111111°111°e°e°e°e°e°e°111°e°1°e°1°I°I �IIIIIIIIIIII■ 1 ■ .IIIIIIII1 ■IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�11111111111 111111111111111111 1111111111I11111III111III111I11111111111I111I11fIlIllllllll111111111111111111111�1111111111111111111111111111IIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIII 111I111I11I111111111'1111111111111111'1111111111111111'11111111�11111IIIII1111111II 111III111I111I111111II IIIII 11111111111111 II'lI,I11111111111111111111111I'I'II11111111111111111111111111'''IIII1111e111111111111111�1�1�1.1 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 1111111 111111I11111111111111t1t11111111111111111111111 . °I° ,I.�111111 ��� IIII I 'I��II1I11111111111111I1111t1111111111111111111e°el Illllllllltllllllllllll , 1111,�II11°1°�. III 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 111111 11 1 1 1 11 I I I 1 1 1 I l t l 1 1 1 1 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII°III Iejejejejelllelllelll1I1I11111111I1111111I111I11111IIII1111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII111111111111111'111I11111IIIfIIIIIIIIIIII • IIIIIIIIIIIII�IIIIIIIIIiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�I lllll11IIIIIIIII IIIIIII�IIIIIII�IIIIIIIIIIIelllllllllllll I111lllllllllllllltllllllltllllllllllllllllllllllltll ',,'' ''''... . '''I'',''',eIlI1I1''' ' ' ' ' ' �III1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1III 111111 IIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII111 III 111 1 1111 . . . e1e1e11111111111111111°IIIIIIIII I I II111IIII IIII �1I1I1!�I �IIeII! I1I1I1I1IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Ihli,( 'I'I'I \■�III'e'I' 'I■� 'I'I'I'I°III°I'I'I'I'I'III'I°I°I1I'IIIIIII1Ili - h' . .liMili ieryt�i�i�i�i�i�i�i�ilililililili�yi�i�i�i�i�i�i�iii�i�ilililili�ilili�iliiili�i�ilili�illlllllellllltlllllllllllelllllllllllllelllellllil '�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII11111I111 111 1111111 11 1111111 1 11 11 I111I11111II1111III111I1111111111111111111I11111I11111I1111111I111I111111111°I°I°I°e°I°e'e°e°e°e° ( I I I I I I I I I 111 1111111 11 1 111111•LLLLLLLLLL1I1I1I111.1.1.1_1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1III11I1111.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1 le°ei 11111I� ' 111II11III111IIII�lllll1111111111111111111111 IIII. ��.� 111111 ���,IIIIIII fl�� °I°e°1°1°III°111°e°e°e°I°111°I°Ilelellllllllll 111 II111 1111 Illlllllllllllllllltlll 11 ► I11 � lllll�I111111. . ■ . . . . ■ ■ . ■ ■ „ .111111111111IIIII111IIIII111I111111111I111III1 �1I1I1�ppppppppl�p1�1I1I1IP1�PPPI�PI�PPPPilllllllllllllllllllll111llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll11111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII'ItI'I'IiI;IiI�I;I;IiI;I�I;I;I�IiIiI;I;IiI'I'I'I'I'I'I'I'I'ISI'I�I�I�IIII�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I;�IfI�I�I�I�I� IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII°IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1III1I1III1I1III1I1I1I1I°I°I°I°I°e°e°II1e1e1e1111111e11111111111111111111111111111 I I I I IIIIIIIII I III I IIIII111IIIIII1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111 111111111111 I I I IIIIIII.(. ■ . ■ ■1.1. .1.1. 1111 " " " " " " 1111 " " " " " " "111111111111111111111111 (IIII 111111 �IIIII� Ile1e1e1e1e1e1e1e1e1e111e111e111e111e111111111 11 11 I 111111 e1e1e1e1e1111111111111111111111111111111111111 IIIIII��.�II1111j'L�IIIIII�'I■��IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 111111111111I11111II11I1�1111111111111I111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII111I1111I111I111I111I111111111III111I111111111111111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII� 1111 °IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII11111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII11I111 11111111111111 IIIII� IIIIIIIII:Illi BIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIejejejejejejejeelllllllllllll1I11111111IIIII11111IIIIIIIIIIII'1°e°ell°e°III°e°e°e°e°e°e°°°°°I°I°e°III°I 9. 1.1.1.1.1.1.661.1.61.1.61.1.11.1.61.1.11.1.1 1.1.1.6 ■ .Id■ . . ■ . .1.61.61.L61.Id.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.Ll.li 44144444444°1444'14444'd14444444441d14444444hh444444444444444414444444444411 144441444444444'41444°144444°1444°14444444h114444444444444444444444144°14'14441 14444414144444444411444°11111444411444114444444°1114444114444444444444444'144114441 111111111111111IIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIII 1111111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIllll111111111 44444444444444'1'1'1'1114444444444444444444444441v1444441>,a444444444444444441, '' Ii441141,I,I,41,41,441,441,I,1,I,1,I,I,1,1,44i,I,I,1,1,1,1,I,I,I,I,I,I,I,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1.•�_,I,1,1,1,1,4441,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,11 44444444444144441i41i44444444444444444441444444444441,,;14444'144444h44°14444 4444'41414144'1'1444444444444444444114'144444'14411'1'A14'144'�,.,44444444444441,44411 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111;,: 111111111111111111 14444444'41114444444444444444444444444444444444444444;a?:4444444444444444441 ,41,1,1,1,441,441,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,111,111,441,41,1,44441,1,1,1,1,441,;-?I,I,t,l,l,l,l,l,l,l,l,l,l,l,l,l,l,l,l I�Ijlilililililililllil!1!I�I�I�I�lilililililililil!1!1!1!I�I�I�I�I!1!1!1!1!1!1!I!1!1!1!1!I!1!1111IIIti,I°I11111111111111111111111111111111111 I,,�II,II'I'�_��'''''''.�f 11,1,1..11111°144'1°111111°III111111111111 II 111,1,1 �J ,I,I,1 I,1,I,I;'..,1,I,I,1,111,1"�1111,I,I,I,I,IIf,1,11 1 ���.■ 11 I I I'■■ 111 ��■- I I I I 111 111 11111 I I I � 1,I,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,111,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,111,1..:,111111111'1111111111111IIIIII11111111 ;1;1;1;1;1;,1;1;1;1;1;1;1;1;1;1;1;1;1;1;1. .�I;1;1;1;1;1;1;1;1;1;1;1;1;1;1;1;1;1; •• !1!I!I!1!I!1!1!I!1!1!I!i�i� !HIM! !I!�!1��!1!�!�!i!I �� 441,1 � X441 -�� 1,1,1,13`cI111111'1 1111 11'1■■11'1111 II-■1111'11(I�-11441.',.,4°d111_1114 I'1 1111111� 444' �111°146:;41441 l4 � I 1111 1111.. 111. .11111 11 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1 I■� � 1111111 '1■- I°°,I,I,! I'i 1'111111 111'1'1'1'111111! '1'111°I°III'111'1'111'1111111'1'.\_ 1°111°,� 4444; 11111°i'i441�I°1°I°1°1°1°144 111111111111111 I I - 111 III 1,.,•1111•!,1 L I 1111 I I I IIIIIIIII IIIIIIII III 111111 IIII IIIIIIII IIIIIP111111:•:1111111111111111111 1,1,1,I,1,1,1,1,I,I,I,1,1i41i41i41,1,1,I,I,1,1,1,1,1,I,I,I,I,I,I,I,I,I,I,I,Ill,lll,llc 114414°11441411 111°1111444144144 441144444444444441444°14444444444444444444444444h°14444441144444°1'1'14444444 I,I,1,1,1,1,1,1,I,1,I,I,I,I,1,1,1,1,1,I,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,I,I,1,I,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,11,1,41141,4411111,1,1,1,1,41,111,1,41,1,11 44444444444444441,,.1.1.LLlaaaddd141i44111•''1'1.1'1'1.44444411444444444:444444g44y444 111.1•la•1.1.1.i.1.1.1.1111, - 11111 111• 1111 LI i 111111 I,1.i 1111111111 111 I' 111 11111111/.T_. 111i 11111111 i,1lllllll llllll� R 4'% I 4441( 44444441,; 4441,!:444444441;.,4!.41,4444444441,1, 1 I■■ 1,1,1,1 1,1,1,111,1,1,1 I,I,1,11.III,1,1,111,111,1,,I :1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,11 111 _ 1__._-111,1,1,1 II�'ll,l,l,l,l,l,l,l I'�I' 1,1,1,1..1,1,111,I,I,I,I,li,l li l,I,I,1,1,111,111,11111111 e 1, , 1,1,1,1, 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,11 1,1,1,1111110�'1'1'I'I°I 41::11111°111°11'11111'111°I „ � °1'1111 r 1'1'1'1'1'1 111111111/ 11111111'1111111' 1 41'1°'-''1°i 1'11111'1'1°�1'P:'I'I'11144'1'I'14'I11'! 11111111111111111.... 111111111. 1111:11 l-111111111!1111111111111 ,1,1,1,111,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,I,eililili1,1,111,1,1,111,1,1,Ii1i1ili1ilil,I,I,I,yl,1,1.111,I,1,I,I,LI,!111,I,I,I,I,I,I,I,I,1,1,1,! �� 1111111'111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 , 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 111°III11111111'I°I°I°I°I°1411'I11'I11°I°111'11111'111111111°11'1°111111111111°1'111'1'1'1°114'1'1'11111111111111111111111°III°1'1'1'1'11 1III��,�IIlII��,�IIliI!�,�11II�,1II�,1Ii�,�IIII�,Ili�,Ili�,�1Il1I!�,�1IliI!�,�I1tII!�,�I1lII!�,�I1lII��,�I1liI�,��IIlII��,�IIl1I��,�I1lIIj�,�IHIM,1I1II!�I,�I11I!�,�11II!�I�11II!�,�11II!�,�I1iI!�,�IOil ON ��I11II!�,�II1II��,OI11iI��,�I111I��,�II11I��,�I111I!�,�1111I!�,�I1111!�,�1111I!�,�1I11I;�1�1111I!�1�1111I!�1�1I11I!�,�11111!�1�II111!�1�I1111!�1�11111!�,�1111I!�1�I1111��1�II111��,�I111I��,�I11i1��l�I11l1��,�II111��,�I1111��,�I1111��,�!I111I�,�!I1I11�I�!I1I1I�l�!I1,11�l�!I1lI1�l�!11lI1�l�!11l11�l�!11l11�l�!I1l11�l�!11lI1�l�!11l1I�l�!I1l11�,�!I1iI1�1�11111��1�II111��1�I1111�11111I •�. �� I 1111 1111 1111111 1111 . 1 I■�■1 111 II■. 111 'I.I�1111111 1111 '1� _� _ 4°I°I' 111111°� I 111111°I°Ill�'■■1''111111 I, 1,1,1,11 ,1,1,1,E 1,1,1,1,1,1,1 1,1,1,11 °1144111111111:11:1'1'11111'11444'1!1!1!1:1:1!1:1111111°1:1!1:1!1:1:1:1'1:1!14:1!14111111111°1111111 '1'111'1 n 1I,',I,I,1,',',111111111111111!liljliljlj',,,1,'1 a 1' 1'1'11 'I°111' 1'1'11111111 / � 71�1!I!I!1� 11'III.■°�° ��I■■I�i�;�;�II■-I'i;�;i;�;�;,I:�:' 111'iJ;i;i,i; �1 1 1'I'1'I'1'1'1'1'1'1 1�1 I�1�1 llilililill 1'I'1'I'1'11,I,1,I,I,I,1,1,1,1,1111'1 I'1'llilil,l,l,l,l,l,l�11�1�1�111 11'11111°111°IIIIIIIIIIII�I°I°111°11111'1°111'1111111'11111111111111111'11111'11111°I1111111111111111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII'111111111111111 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,111,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1.1.11111.111111111.111J111111111111I I,1,1,1,1111111,111,111,111,111,1,111,1,1,1,111111111111111111111,1,1,1,1,1,111111,1111111,111,11111,1,1,1 ililililililili1i1i1if 1i1i1ili1iP11 IIII'IIIi I■■IIIII'°11111■�■IIIII'111'I'I.L■�;■�IIIIIII'111 1111'111111111111'11�III111'1I • 11111�'I III II�IIIII I�I 1,1,1,1,11 111°1°111111 �--- . 1,1,1,1,1,1,: 111111111111111111111 '11111111 111111111111111°1111 1111 1 � 11111111'1'1`1111111 111°111111°11111111111111111111111111111 I,I,I,I,lil,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1i1,1,1,1,1i1�111,11111,I,1,1,II1,1,I,I,I,I,I,I,lilililil,l,l,l,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,111,1,1,1,1,11 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,111,I,I,/,I,I,I,I,I,I,I,I,I,I,I,I,I,I,I,I,I,LI�1.101.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,11 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,11111 1111111111111°I°I°11111°II11111111111111111111111111111111111111 '111'144'1'1'1'11111'1'I'1°I°I'111111111'111'I'11111'11111°III°141°II°IIIIIIIIIIIIIIi141111411'111°1111111°111111111111111111111111'111 11111111111111°11111°111°I°1111411°111°1111111°II1111111'1111111114111111111111111111111111111111111111111111'111111I111I11°1'1'1'111'14 ,�,�,�,�,�,�1�1�1�I�1�1�1�1�I�1�1�1�1�I�1�I■■II�I�I�I'11�I�I�I�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�I�I�1�1�1�1�1�1�I�I�I�1�I�1�1�1�1�I�I�1�1�I�1�111 1111111111'144111111'11111111111'1111111'14'1'1 I 11'11441°III'1111'11111'I'I'111'1411111111111141°1111111'1111111'1°1111111111111'1 I II II II1111111111III11111111111111III IIIIIIIIII1111111111IIIIIII 1111111 I'l4'I'1!1!1!1!I!1!I!1!1!1!1!1'I'1'1'I'1'1'1'111°I'I'I°1'11 11111111111�1'I'111'111'111'I'111°1'1'111111111114°111111'1'1'14'14'1'1114'11 1�1�I�1�1 - 1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�I�1�I�I�1�I�1111�1�I�I�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�I�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�I�I�I�I�1�I�I�1�1�1�1�I�1�1� '111°11111■11111°11111111°I°I°11111°III11'111'I'1'111111111°111°141111111111111111111°1'11111°111141111'1'11111 'dd14'C444444444441,1,4441,4441(44444444444444444444444441,4444444411 44441 114444444444444444441(4444444444444444444444444444444y444 11111...... JI I11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 14'1°111'I'1'1'1'1'I'I'I'1'I'11111'1'144°1114444°11111°1111144'1441111°1111111111111111111111111°111°11111°14444°11111°1'1441 111111111111111I11111111111111111111111111II111111111111111111111111111 444444444441,44444444444444444444444144444444444444444444444444444444y411 44444444444444441,444'1'111444444444°1444444444444444441,44444444444441444444 �1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�dy1�d1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�d1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1��1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�i�1�1�1�d1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1 11144444444h4444°11144°144444444111114444'1144444444444411°1441444411141144444444'1'1 11111111111111111111111111111111111'II IIIIIII111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 141,4444444444444444441,4444444441,1,44411,444444414441A1444444444441,4441444441 144°1444444441144114444°1114°14444444441414111'41444444444444444114'14444444411°14441 ,4444441d14444444444444444444444441,441',4444444444444444444444444441,4444441 ,4444444444411444444444444444444444441,44441,44444444444444444444441,4444441 ,4444444444444444444444444444444'141414441,44444444444444444444444444414441 111111111IIIIIIIIII11Ili 111111 IIIIIdllllllllllll lllllllll 1111111111111 I,I,I,1,1,I,I,I,I,I,1,1,I,1,1,1,I,1,1,1,1,I,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,111'1°14'1'1'1°I'I'I°111'1111111°111'114'1'1 111'I'I11'111'1'11111'I'i 1411'1'-1.1 1 1 1.1.1.1.1.1-!111°III'11111111111'1°1111111'111'11111''111°1111111°111'111°111'1111111'11111'1'111111144111111°11111111111°I 1,1,1,1,1;-- - -,I,I,I,I,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1 A,I,I,I,1,1,1,1,1,1,111,1,1,1,1,111,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1111 1,1,1,1,1 I,I,I,I,I,I,I,I,I,f,l,l,l,l,l,l,1,111,1,1'11,I,I,I,I,I,I,I,III,I,I,I,I,I,Ii1,1,I,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,11 I,I,1,1,1��■,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,111,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,111,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,11 11111 IIIIIIIII(IIIIIIIIII t1111111111III1111111111111111111111 1111'1'1'I'I'I'1'I'I'1'1'1'1'111'I'I'1'11'111'I'1'1111111'111'I'1'I'll i'11111'1°1'1 111°I'111'111'111'1'1'I'I'1'111'11111°1'111'1°1'11111'1111 IIII III II111111111111IIII V III III II Ii Il1111111111111111I 111111111111111 111°11111°1411°1'1°1'111'11111'111'I'1'111'I'I'11111!1!I!1!1!1!lil�li111'1111I'l'111!I'111'1'11111°111111111111111'I'11t'11!'!'I'1'111'111111 144444444444444444h°ehlrrri rrl•rrr� 411 1-111144'44441'1°i°144444'044444444444144441444 I,I,I,I,I,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,11,Ifilliilll'1111'11111 ,,,�IlIlI�1�1l101�1�1�1�1�1�1i1�1�1 i1�1lI�1�1l1�1�1�1�1�1�1l1�1�111 ll 1 Lr 1J-1 11 1111 1 L1 1J 1 1 i 1..L1 1 1.1 i L1 1 1.1.1 - 14111111111111111111111hall'IIIIIIIIIIIIillllll'11111111111111114'Illll'iillll141illllllllllllllll'I'll;ll'•'11111111111'lllllll'llllll Illlllllllillllllllllll'llllllllllll111111111111111111111'llilllllill�]J111111111111111111111111111111111111'illi::11111111111111111111111111 1111 ill'I'llllllllilliliillllllllllll'I Illllllll lllllll l l'1�lll ill l'll!31111111411'11111111�''llll'1'lll!I Ill'llll�llll Illlillli4 1 1�1�141�141�I�I�Ijl�l41�141�1�1�1�14141�14141�14141�141�1�1�i�1414t Iii I��!i�I=��141414141�1�1�I�141i..:141�i���1��1�1�141�1�141�!�I�f�1�14111 Illll 11111 Ill 1111111111111111111111111111111 Illllllllllllll�11!11;lr'IYllll II,I,I,I,I,IIt�'.j4jl�!1!1�1!I!I!I!I!1!1!1!I!1!j!4!1 ,111,1,1,11111,1,1,1,111,1,1,1,111,1,1,1,1i1,111,f,1,1,111,1,1il,1.d11-�y1,X111,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,II"'Illli-.11L.,1,1,1111111,1,111,I11,111 111111111111111111111111111111111't l'IIII`Y11111111113.:11.'1111111111111111 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1.1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,!,I1111111111111441141,1111111�,1111 t'1l1''111'I'I11111111111111111'I 11 11'11i 1/,/`��1111 ,�'''1'll 1111 l''I'I''lillll ill 111111 ll �I.■ 1111111 �.1111111'� ,.1111'1'141111� Illllllllllllll4 11 1111: 111 -,�I 111111 II111111 I I,,,nnnl.illlnn n„nl,lll l'1nn1 nnnl r::I 111 1!I I;I��_�1,1,1,1, ,1,1,1 1,1,1,1,11,1,1,1,1;••,•• IIII II 1I���1,1,111`��'I,I,1(II.�II,I,1,1 'llallllll�all 11 1,1,1,1 ,11111„ I,I,I,Ip:;;1,1i1,1,1, 1,11 4" lllllll, hall.:. 1,1,111b:{,1,1,1,1, 1,11 alp;1;1;1;P1;1;1;r;1;1,11I,1iI,I;I;I;I;1;1; !;I;I;Ij11111,111,y1;1j1;I;I;I;I;rjl;l;lj,agar;1,1,1,1,1, 1,11 �1111111111111111111111111411111'.. ''1'1'1'''1','''''1','''''{i1'I' 1 ..'1'1'11 .-11111,Lc11'1'I 11111 Illllllllllllllll 44444444444444441 ,441,, 1,41,1 @=111141,1 144�144444444 . , 1111111111111111111111111411111• ,x1,1,, 1,1,1,1 a"1,1,1,1,11x11 Illllllllll'lll'I 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111:11111111111111{ l1111111�ililililililllililillililililililililili$lilili'ililili'illlililAilililitill$$1141�1i1i"+i;lfiliililiiliililililil , ,, „ IIt', I1111111!� 111151111 l- IIII . 11'' 1111x1� allallllalll'� yxxal,.,aaaa:llira la'x11111111111i41i1,1,1,11 11 I��=�1111111 I 1111111,41'1,1 �1,111,1,1 11,1,1111.I,IA,Ihr•111111141111111111111111 4�I444 I��I4444y4411�'�-1 41x44'11 144!414 Ir!,axl�144444xx4 lili,=rrrrr,,,.�ii�iii�, i4iii4iii�i�iii�' ii4ii4iii��i'!�i�iii ii%i'i ipf��iiiii i4i4i4i4i�iii�i�i11 ♦ 41,1,1,111,111,i,1,1,1,I,I,Ii41,i,I,I,I,1,1,1,11I,iI,1,I,I,I,11111,111,1,1,41,11111141,1,I,I,!,1,1,I,1,1,1,111,1,!1111,11111,1,114,�i411 1,111,1,1,1,1,11,1,1,i,11,1,1,1,p,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,i,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,I,I,I,I,I,I,I,1i41,1,1,111i111,1,1,111,11 I 1 I,I,I,111,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,111111111,1,Ill,Illll,l,l,l,l,l,l,l,l,l,l,l,l,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,111,1,1,1,111,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,111,11 . 1111111111111111111111111111111'till 11111 illlllllllllillllllllllllll l'11111111111411141�11�41111111111111111!�1i11,l!1�!!I!!!IIII'1�1�!1 � i ,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,11�,',',�,1,44441,41,1,41,L�i�,',�,444441,I,I,LI,1,1,44�,�,4,4,�,�,4,111111111!I!iil!lil!i!i!I!141�'11 • 1 1111 111 1111111 � I 1 1 111 1111 11111 1 IlIl! r 11 IL1� 111,1,1 I�■ �1,4,1 '�- �i,l,l,li4 � 11411,1 � 1j ,1,111,1 11j,1 11'Illll l'\=�11 !j� 1'Pi!1!1 !i!il.1 !� 1 1!1!11111 !1!1!1!1!1!1 1111 11I I!1!il1.111l1lI!Ci!i!I!111 I I'll!1 1I I 1,1 0!1!:!�, 1114!114 41I141I11111�11111 111 1 IIS II�I�III�I 1i�-��1,11111/ -�-I,1,11 % 1,111,I,I,Ii41,I,I,I,Id,1,1d,4 Jd,1,1,111 11 I.-II1,1,1;I'��I111111 iI�-I11411'lll'I! 'i!I 4�, 4441'' d145� 4444114'�h4 c �,'; 4444` ,444, 44441,4 411 11 1'1'1'1'1'1'1'I'I'1'1 111 1 1-I'1'1'1'1'1'1'1'I'1'I'1 1 1 1 1'1'1'I'1'I'I'1'1'1'{'1'1'1'1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 Ill'llllililllllllllllll'11�1�141�1414141�1�I�I�I�1�141�141�141�1�1�1�I�141�1�141�I�1�1�I�1�1�1�1�141�I�Ijljljljljl�ljljljljllljljljljljlj1�11 111'lllll!1!I!I!1!1!I!1!1!I!1!11111'I'I'lll!I!1!I!1!I!1!I!I!I!1!Illllllllllll!I!I!I!1!1!I!I!1!1!I!I'I'll 1'1'1'1 111'1{111'I'1'1'1'lil'lil'11 ,1,1,1,1, -,1,1,1,111,1, 11i41,I,I,Ir - I,I,111,1,1i4111,1i4111,1i111,1,1,1,1,1 14x1111� 111111111111� � Illlilllllili llll1111111111114111111111111111111111i111 1111 111111 111111 IIPIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIICI 1'''1'1'' a'1'''I'1'''1 . I1'''1'1'1'''1l ■ 1111fI,Ii41,i,1,1i4111111111111x411114 111,111 ,41,1141,1 1,1,1,1,1,1,1 ll,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,11 11111 --- 111111 II111 t, II 1111111111111111111 111111111'I'I'I'I'I'1'I'I'1'1'I'1114x1111'1'1'1'1'1'I'I'I'1'1'Illllllll'111'I'I'I'I'I'1'1'1'I'1'i111111It1114x11xlllllll111xllxllllxl • 1111111111111111111i1111111111111i11lIlI1111111111111111111i1111111111 1 I'I 1'1'1'1 1'1'1 I'1'1'I'1'1'Illllllllll'lllllll'I'lllll'I'11111111 I'lll'll11111111111114111111x41111',1,41,1,1,1,1,41,1,1,41,1,1,1,1,I,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,111111111111',I,I,I,1,1,1,4111,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,111,1,1 1�1�1�I�1�1�1�1�I�1�I�141�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�IIl1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�i�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�111 111111111x1111111111111x11'111111111114114!1!1il!1!1!1!1!Illll'1'1411111111'llllllllllllilill'i111i'lllllllllllll'lllllllllllllllllllll 111111111411411111111111111'lllillill,ir�� -111111'11,1,11ii41,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,111,11'llll11111411'lllllllllllll'lllll 1,111,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,111,1111111,,1,1,1,11,1,1,1 1,1,1,III,I,i,1,I,1,1,I,1,I,I,1,I,I,1,1,1,I,1,1,1,11111,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,11 1,1,1,1,1,111,1,1,1,1,111,11111,1,1 .■I1111114111111111111111111111111111'I111111111'111111111411111111411111111 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,11 I,1,1,1,I,I,I,1,I,1 1,1,1,111,I,1,1,1,111,1,1,1,1,1,1,1111 111,1,1,1,1,1,I,I,1,I,11,111,I,111,1,11 44444444444'''''144444441-:-.. 4144144444444444444444111144141hdd144444 h4'A144444a444444xx4'd1444h44'i'i'i'i'i44x444444x44x441,xaxaay44x4aaa444444444y 11111,I,1,1,111111I,111,I,I,41,I,1i41,I,I,1,1,1,1,1,1,I,1,1i4441,111,1,1,1,1,1,I,a1,1,1,441,I,I,1,1,1,1,1,1,41,1,111,1,111,111,1,11 44441.1aaa 1,1.1.1.1.L!d1444444x4x444x4h4x41144441dddd144444444444y1144444444441,y4 1,4441 14444444144444444444'144hhx4444114444'dt4444444444444444444 44441 1444444x44444444x44444444444444144hh444h441444444a4444'111 '44441 ,444444444441444441,4444444x44444444xx444444444y444444444 11111 �■ 11111111111 h 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 14444...... ;4444411'1444444444x444444444441dd14444444444444444444444441 Illllllll'1'll!'Illllllll'1'1'IlI11111111111111111xllllllllllllllllxl lllxlillllllllllxl1111111111141111111111'11111111111'1111111111111 1�I�I�1414141�141�I�I�i�l�14141�1�I�I�1�1�141�1�I�1�I�I�I�1�1�I�1�1�141�1�1�1�1�I�141�1�I�I�1�1�141�1�14141�I�I�I�I�I�i�l�141�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1� 11111,1,ill,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,I,I,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,111,1,1,1,1,1,1i1,1,1,111,1,1,1,I,1,Ill,I,I,Il1,l,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,111,11 1,1,1,111,1,1,1,1,111,1,Ill,I,I,I,1,111,11111,111,1,111,111,1,1,111,1,111,1,1,11111,1,I,Illli,l,Ill,I,1,I,I,I,I,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,11 1,I,1,1,1,I,I,1,I,1,I,I,1,1,I,1,I,1,1,I,I,i41,l,l,l,l,l,l,l,l,l,l11,111,I,I,1,1,1,1,1,I,I,I,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,111,1,1,111,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,111,1,11 I,111,I,I,I,Iililli,lll,l,l11,111,111,111,I,{i1,1,111,111,111,1,111,1,111,111,1,1,1,1,1,111,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,11 I,I,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,III,I,I,I,1,I,I,til,l,l,l,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,11I,1,III,I,I,1,I,I,I,1,I,I,I,I,I,I,1,I,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,111,1,11 11111,1111111,1,1,1,1,1,I,I,1,1,I,I,I,1,1,1,111,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,111,1,1,111,1,I,I,1,1,1,1,1,1,111,I,I,I,I,I,Il1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,11 1,1,1,111,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,111,1,1,1,1,111,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1111111,1,1,11111,111,1,1,1,1,11111,1,1,11111,1,1,1,111,11111,1,1,1,1,1,11 1,1,I11,I,I,I,I,I,I,i11,1,1,111,1,1,1,111,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,111,1,111,1,1,1,1,1,11111,1,1,1,111111111,111,1,111,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,11 1,1,111,111111111,1,1,1,1,1,111,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,111,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,111,1,1,1,1,1,1,1111111,1,1,1,1,1,111,11 111,I,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,111,1,1,1,1,1i441,I,1,1,111,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,111,1,1,1,1,1141,41,1,1,111,111,1,I,1,41,1,441,4t,I1111,1,1,1,1,11 1 1 1 11-'.'.�.�.�.'-�-r-�-�-1 1 1 1 1 1 11 11 11 1 1 1 1 11 1111 1 1 1111 1 111 1 1 1 1 1 11 111 1 1 11 1 1111 1 1 1 11 1111 -. - 111111111111111111111111111111111111111{1111111111111111 44441 144444444444x444444411!,44444x44441,444444444444441,44444444 '{1111'11�a■111111'1111111111111111111111111111114111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111411 1111x111 ,1,1,1,1,1,11111,I,I,I,IiI,I,I,11x11114111111111111111{111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 ,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,11 'llllllllll'I'I'I'I 1.1'1.1'1'111114411111111111141111411411114111111111114111141111114x4411I I II1111411111411111111114114 1,I 11l 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,111,11111,1,1,1,1,1,11111,1,1,1,1,I,1,I,I l 1,1,111,1,111,1,1,1,1,1,I,I,1,1,1,1,1,1,I,I,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,11111,1,1,11 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,111,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,111,1,1,1,1,1,1,111,1111111111111,1111{11,1,111,1,1,111,1,1,111,1,1,111,11,1,1,1,1,1,11 I,I,III,I,I,l,l,l,l,l,l,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,111,11111,111111111111119111,I,1,I,Ill,I,I,I,1,1,1,1,1,11,1,1,1,1,1,11 1,111,I,I,I111111,1il,Ill,11111,1,I,I,1,1,1,1,111,1,1 III,1,1,1,1,1,1111,1,111,11111,1111111,1,1,1,11111,1,1,1,1,1,1,111,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,11 111111111111'lll'lllllllllllllllllllllllll 1 I'1 I 1 1'1'1'1'1'I'I'1'1'Illlllillllllllllllllllllllllll'1'1111111111141111111111111x1111114 44444444441,1,41,!,444441,!1!14!,44!1l1i,4!1!1!,!14!,!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!,!,!14444444444 PREMIUM STEEL DOORS PREMIUM STEEL DOORS Internal Blinds • m ,J ��.i 130 131 132 133 135 ;q Screen.Vented Glass ;3 I it o- 13700 241 2420 2430 2440 Flush and Embossed Door Panels .Premium Steel Door Style:Double 814 K //4J''� � durable w � A/ 1004.Of 208 �D �••1/�_ ❑Ce-free i1D C ire now D mages 7 2s. lave the 21o•t � nz ;`� - xu• xuslx �xro- 813slx x12• xlzax 91x61x „ 214 270 Premium Steel Door Style:208 Key jjT177� 3 Available m 20'width 0 Available in 36'width- v - ,'1 j 1 • Available in 2'6'Mdth f Available in 7V height • Available in 2'6'-single bore only a PVC doodite frames ¢ ! • Availablewing gle in lass j! 3 Premium tb sl Stee18'doors are available in 2'8'and 3'0'widths. t 1L L Premium Steel 8'sidehtes are available in 12'and 14'widths. - _- .. r_ Dimensional data an be found on page 94. ,5 i 290 x08•! 828SLX 82x•+a 896X - 8108008- Note:Premium Steel doors shown here are n manufactured to illustrate �s 901HERMAOLl one of facibili-applied Steel doors are manufactured with 1HERMAPH 91 one mat of(atlory�applied semigloss white primer. • FRENCH DOORS r i MORGAN DOORS Morgan offers a variety of French door options. For the ultimate in exterior performance,choose the Marquis compression glazed offering.These designs feature 5/8" insulated glass and a virtually leak-proof door. Interior French doors i are available in standard designs,as well as the Morgan®Triomphe option, t which offers the added sparkle of polished v-grooves.Many sidelights and grilles w are also available. i 32N FXT �Oa►Doacz 'SLG000 ':Low- PA1N'= W1A(TC V4F �i* �4 � Y y :Fz 13/9 Door 13/4 Door 13/y'Door OAK-6o,q,M-69n Marquis OAK-69io,M-69 10 Marquis OAK-6915,M-6975 Marquis OAK-150LOAK-5901 OAK 1510.OAK-iSioB,M-3911,M-39116 OAKII ,OAK- 13/8"Door 13/8'Daor , /8"Door 17556,M-392,M-3928 3 OAK-15ot KP-1501,M-3901 OAK1po.OAK-151.8,KP 151o,KP-g10B, OAK igig,OAK-1515B,KP-1515,KP-15156. (Pine pictured) RP-1510.M-3911,Mggn B,RP-3911 RP.1515,M 3913,M-391¢8.RP.3912 )Oak pictured) (Pine pictured) B &r[Ie0 RP RrsM/Gine Mogan ipttialty DesiE^s in Pint OYR Oal •V gaOlala Ntlri31 • � 111 11 a rte` �,.iYyt, � , ?�'•m�y �F � 1 P .,y T'sMy - .s F t '- r i f T dJ:f � ► � �n i � f rlr 11 RIF r i. ISI' I ' •tH- i ��i e 'TrimLine Series DR200 Alum. Clad Wood WINDOWS INCORPORATED _ REPLACEMENT WINDOWS EnLou the beauty and warmth of wood • The insulating qualities of wood provides a positive CUSTOM MADE EXACT TO 1/8" thermal break and can be painted or stained. • All wood parts are produced from the finest quality All Structural Performance tests were kiln dried select Western Pine and are treated with a performed by an independent testing lab as water repellent preservative. Also available in Oak, perAAMA/NWWDA 101/1.S.2-97 for: Cherry,and Mahogany. AIR INFILTRATION TEST • Maintenance free aluminum clad exterior is weather resistant.Does not require painting.Available in 03 CFMnT White,Bronze,Earthtone and Beige.Custom colors r MmAllowed are also available. Full-Metal Spacer No-Metal Super Spacer® • Decorative functional wood bead glazing provides a With conventional metal Patented silicone foam °'05�r . _�.�,. Measured positive energy tight seal for the insulating glass. spacers,condensation design dramatically reduces (25M.Px.) ". can be expected in condensation,delivering the STRUCTURAL LOADS • Fully weather-stripped to insure maximum comfort extreme weather conditions. clearestpicture in warm and low air infiltration. edge technology 0.159 0.159 •Bah pM1orornm mYrn dunngrdrnamr g gy Max.Allowed Max.Allowed indent.oa la=drn'.I radrnwu • '. Optional Super Spacer not e only boosts perimeter performance,it can also help oMa�1 0.001red ^ enhance overall U-values by (25 M.P.H.) —s as much as 30%. (07sesrxxTEwoa) 67.5 PSFIM ERIOR) 4r� •1 FS`: tllnitlM ltll fP&drS v - I' ucd H-RI54d a 60 Mt Product De®gretion r Standard double pain 3/4"insulating glass is also •- d ' available with: All Thermal Performance and Solar Heat High-performanceLow"E•'/Argon gas Gain Calculations were performed by an Super Low"E"with warm-edge Super Spacer independent testing lab as per NFRC 100 • Unlike"ordinary"wood windows which employ and Krypton gas. and NFRC 200-95 respectively for: awkward compression tilt systems,Trimliners unique . Standard sliding half screen with extruded U- SHOC recessed tilt latch and tilUtake-out design allows for aluminum frames for longer life include an VALUE easy removal for cleaning or finishing while provid- integral lift rail and positive seal bug flap. Standard .52 54 ing esthetic appeal. Available in Beige or White with (Optional full screen for maximum toplbotiom matching jambliner. ventilation also available.) Low"E"/Argon Gas .39 .50 GRILLE OPTIONS HARDWOOD OPTIONS Low"E"on arSpacer .35 50 &KryptGas F ;tet C ALSO AVAILABLE Cherry Series DR 300-custom size with full 4 9/16'jamb for installations where total removal d� s of old window is required. M 10910"io,lip Elm ` .= r ,a � •u _ - . ..`.;., Oak Astheticafl appealing removable For achieving that authentic divided wooden grilles in 5/ 8'or 7/8"widths lite look,Simulated True Divided liter White Earthtone Beige Bronze that can be painted or stained or 5/8" with permanent 7/8"wooden interior maintenance free in-glass aluminum grille and permanent exterior muntin AnualrolonmaywryJromillusrrotian muntins or combination wood and are also available. (Shown above with at are also available. historicpanning.) Mahogany Custom colors also available Z'rimune DISTRIBUTED BY: WINDOWS INCORPORATED re Salem ® Redevelopment (01 Authority DESIGN REVIEW BOARD THURSDAY, JANUARY 31, 2002 5:00 p.m. Roll Call: Paul Durand Donald Giard Chris Greene David Jaquith Fred Johnson • Agenda: 1. Biscotti Cucina—231 Washington Street—Sign Application 2. Town House Square— 101 Washington St./228 Essex St. —Fagade Modifications 3. Hess Gas Station—295 Derby Street—Building Construction 4. Police Station Redevelopment—Continuation of Project Review esd\drb\agenda • One Salem Green • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 aSalem Redevelopment Authority TENTATIVE AGENDA DESIGN REVIEW BOARD THURSDAY, JANUARY 31, 2002 5:00 p.m. Roll Call: Paul Durand Donald Giard Chris Greene David Jaquith Fred Johnson • Agenda: 1. Biscotti Cucina—231 Washington Street— Sign Application 2. Dunkin' Donuts—282 Derby Street—Sign Application 3. Old Police Station Redevelopment—Continuation of Project Review 4. Town House Square— 101 Washington St./228 Essex St. —Fagade Modifications 5. Hess Gas Station—295 Derby Street—Building Construction esd\drb\agenda • One Salem Green • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 Salem Redevelopment Authority To: DRB Members From: Joseph Walsh, Executive Director Re: DRB Meeting—January 31, 2002 — 5:00 PM Date: January 29, 2002 The enclosed package contains plans and sign applications that have been received and have been tentatively placed on the agenda for Thursday's meeting. The DRB staff is currently reviewing these applications to ensure they meet City and SRA requirements and can be reviewed by the DRB. The main focus of our meeting on Thursday will be the review of the Old Police Station. You may wish to review these plans carefully, as changes have been made since the last presentation. This will be an important meeting. I hope you can attend. • One Salem Green • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 • Design Review Board Minutes of the Meeting Thursday, January 31, 2002 5:00 p.m. The Design Review Board met in open session on Thursday, January 31, 2002 at 5:00 p.m. in the third floor conference room at 120 Washington Street. Those in attendance were: Paul Durand, Don Giard, Chris Greene, and Dave Jaquith. SRA Executive Director Joseph Walsh was also present. Biscotti Cucina—231 Washington Street—Sign Application Mr. Ed Juralewicz from United Sign presented a sign application for a new bakery at 231 Washington Street. The sign is an internally illuminated box with a bronze opaque face and translucent white letters. The sign is 20" x 86" and will fit into the middle panel of the storefront. The cabinet is 6" deep and will protrude 4" from the brick face. He stated that a flush sign with overhead lighting was explored, but there is a steel beam across the front of the building and lights would not be feasible. This is also the reason for the protrusion of the sign cabinet. Secondly, Mr. Juralewicz present two options for the building address. The first was option was for just the number 231, as originally submitted. The second option, which the building owner prefers, was to have 231 Washington Street, as shown on the drawing distributed at the meeting. • Mr. Durand commented that the sign looks punched in, since it only protrudes in the middle. He recommended that the sign face be over the three panels. Mr. Juralewicz stated that notching the aluminum would be complicated. Mr. Durand made a motion to approve the Biscotti Cucina sign with the condition that the cabinet be notched and fill the entire band (all three panels), and to approve option 2 - the 231 Washington Street number and address scheme. Mr. Greene seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Town House Square— 101 Washington/228 Essex Streets—Facade Modifications Mr. Richard Pabich and Mrs. Diane Pabich appeared before the DRB with a request for three modifications to the building. The first is on the north elevation where there is an existing door on the fourth floor of the building. The request is to replace the door with an aluminum clad TrimLine window with a granite sill. The window style will match the existing windows on this facade. Mr. Durand commented that he was concerned with the DRB setting a bad precedent by allowing the use of aluminum-clad windows in a building where the other windows are . wood. He also stated that the application did not include enough details of the proposed window, such as mullion size, and stated that the applicant needs to submit a DRB Minutes January 31,2002 Page 2 of 8 specification sheet/catalog cut with the window details before a recommendation could be made. Mr. Jaquith stated that he would like more information also, since there could be a problem that the proposed window would not look like the other wooden windows. The second request is on the east elevation and calls for the replacement of an existing window with a door on the second floor that will open out to the existing concrete slab, which will be used as a deck for that unit. The top window frame will remain and the door will replace the lower window. Mr. Giard asked if there would be railings installed around the deck. Mr. Pabich responded that there would be. Mr. Jaquith informed the applicant that he will need to submit the railing style to the DRB for review and approval. He then asked what the proposed door would look like. Mr. Durand stated that the applicant needs to submit a specification sheet/catalog cut for the door before a recommendation could be made. The third request is for the east elevation of the building, where they are requesting approval to install a wooden exit door on the ground level that will replace an existing window. • Mr. Jaquith recommended that the door be a metal door. Mr. Durand asked what color paint wood be use. Mr. Pabich responded atrium white will be used. Mr. Durand stated that the applicant needs to submit a specification sheet/catalog cut for the door before a recommendation could be made. Mr. Greene stated that the applicant can submit the catalog cuts and they could be shown to the members without waiting for another DRB meeting. Mr. Greene made a motion to approve the three modifications outlined in the submitted letter and plans dated January 24, 2002, contingent upon the developer submitting and the DRB members approving catalog cuts of all new doors and window. Mr. Jaquith seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. At this time, Mr. Giard also requested that design drawings be submitted for the first floor of the building. The Board concurred with this request. Hess Gas Station—Derby Street—New Construction Attorney Todd Rodman, Hess Representative Frank Livingston and Luke DiStefano, engineer, appeared before the DRB with plans to construct a 1600 s.f. Hess Express building and improvements to site. • DRB Minutes January 31,2002 Page 3 of 8 • Mr. DiStefano began by stating he has been working to try to incorporate the guidelines of the City's Harbor Plan and the State's Waterway Act—Chapter 91 into the Hess design. There is a walkway from the front of the property to the rear and a 10-foot wide walkway along the South River to tie into the proposed City's Harbor Walk. The State reviewed the rear landscape plan and asked that some of the landscape that was placed to hide the rear of the building be toned down to create more open recreational green space. Mr. DiStefano then showed the Board plans for building. He also distributed photographs of a building done in Concord N.H. The proposed Salem building has been designed to fit into the character of Salem by using a brick fagade and a different roof style using architectural shingles. The green and white checkerboard tile will be on three sides of the building. Mr. DiStefano explained that the back of the building will house utility space so there are no fenestrations. However, Mr. DiStefano stated that he tried to break up the fagade by different depths in the fagade and by installing planters. Mr. Greene asked what the structure of the roof is. Mr. DiStefano responded that it is a parapet. The roof itself is a steel, flat roof. Mr. Greene asked what the fascia material would be. Mr. DiStefano stated it is shown as an aluminum band, but the developers are • willing to work with the Board, if an alternate material is recommended. Mr. Greene commented that the concern regarding this project is that a strip type use is being inserted into the urban fabric, so the building needs to look more urban than suburban. He stated that this can be accomplished by modifying its shape as well as its materials, but still end up with a series of elements that remain so the business can be identified. He stated that he would like tot see the roof come to a regular eave and not use the aluminum fascia panel, so the building looks a little bit older. He stated that there will still be a Hess Gas Station in the front of the lot that will be easily recognizable. Mr. Giard stated that he agreed with Mr. Greene's comments regarding the roof and fascia. These elements do not fit within the context of the area and changing them will go a long way in improving the design. Mr. Jaquith stated that he did not find the green and white tiles problematic, but he did have concerns over the Hess Express sign. He felt it should be shifted down to the walls of the building, because the way it is shown now, looks like it is floating. Mr. Greene commented that this could be an opportunity to make the building look like a restoration of an oldg as station. Mr. Greene commented that the window boxes should project out. • Mr. Giard stated that he did not like the dormers and the roof should made more simple. Mr. Greene commented an overhang would be nice to shield people from the rain. DRB Minutes January 31,2002 Page 4 of 8 • Mr. Durand commented that he would like to see a darker tone of green used and he also stated he would like a more traditional roof with architectural shingles. Mr. Giard brought up the issue of signage, stated that he had done some preliminary calculations, and it appears that the proposed signage is beyond the square footage allowed by the Urban Renewal Sign Guidelines. Mr. Durand expressed his concern that the front to back walking path was not connected to the store. Mr. Greene suggested that the path be moved in and the hedges be moved out. Mr. Greene stated that he would like to see a couple of shade trees planted which will signal hat there is open space and also give context for the scale of the building. He suggested an Oak or Linden deciduous tree with a 5" caliper. Mr. Greene suggested a granite bollard and chain barrier be used along the water. Mr. Distefano responded that a wrought iron fence 2-3 feet high could be used. Mr. Greene stated that the harbor walk needs a linear identity and asked if the City has • guidelines for size, location, materials, etc. Mr. Giard stated that the Harbor Plan does have some specifications and this is the first private property project being proposed since the Harbor Plan was enacted so some details have not been addressed, however the City is hiring a consultant to work on these issues. Mr. Giard suggested that the ornamental plants be consolidated in one area instead of many small pockets. Mr. Greene agreed with this suggestion. Mr. Giard asked if there was any way to remove the concrete pad at the walk entry on Derby Street. Mr. DiStefano stated that there is some confusion at that part of the walkway regarding boundary lines. Mr. Livingston stated that if the sidewalk can be straightened, we will do it. Mr. Giard suggested that some green space be added in front of he gas canopy, such as a hedge and a small metal fence to give the property better definition to the street. Mr. Livingston and Mr. DiStefano agreed to study this suggestion. Mr. Giard asked if an irrigation system is being proposed for the landscaping improvements. Mr. DiStefano stated that HESS has not decided whether an irrigation system will be installed. Mr. Greene stated the importance of an irrigation system to maintain the plants. • DRB Minutes January 31,2002 Page 5 of 8 • Old Police Station Redevelopment Mr. French distributed a specifications outline for the project. He informed the DRB that the Planning Board walked through the project site and the development team has met with Historic Salem and the Downtown Main Streets District Committee. One of the changes to the plan, which resulted from a Planning Board meeting, was that a public passage way has been added to the Charter Street fagade. He stated that the parking plan has been changed to accommodate 15 regulation spaces and 9 compact spaces. He continued that the developer feels it is important to get the overnight cars off the street so they do not compete for parking spaces with shoppers. He pointed out that by removing a parking space,the Charter Street entrance into the parking area has been expanded to 26 feet. He informed the Board that he has met with Mr. Thetriault and he was receptive to the 12' access space left in the rear of the parking lot so vehicles can access the rear of his and Mrs. Lally's building. Mr. French stated the developer has not spoken with Mrs. Lally, but the intend to do so shortly. Mr. French pointed out that Red's has been accommodated with a dumpster space that will hold a front loading dumpster. The Board was shown that the parking on the side by Red's has been moved closer to the building to create a 4' sidewalk on the side closest to Red's. Mr. French continued that if it is approved by the SRA, the developer has agreed to • market the two front units (2,000 sq.ft.) as artist living, working and gallery space. He showed the redesign of the four spaces created under the carriage house. Mr. Greene stated that the 20 dimension between e space #18C and 26 should be 22 feet. Mr. French informed the Board that the balustrade that was part of the original design will be replicated in fypon. He continued that different materials are being explored for the penthouse and as suggested by the DRB, the fenestrations have been made symmetrical with the front. Mr. French then showed the Board the alternate design for the carriage house that consisted of a brick fagade and a cornice that is simplified but has the same characteristics as the existing building's cornice and a mansard roof. The roof material has not been finalized, but could be a simulated slate. He then informed the Board that he studied different materials for the penthouse such as cementitious panels. Mr. Greene asked where the steps were on Charter Street. Mr. French stated they are set back in to the property line; they do not encroach on the City sidewalk. Mr. French pointed out that the rear carriage house fagade will have 16' wide garage doors designed to look like old barn doors and two Juliet balconies above. • DRB Minutes January 31,2002 Page 6 of 8 • Mr. French then showed the Board the rear entry to the main building which will have an arched canopy, metal roof. He pointed out the privacy yards. Mr. Giard asked what the deck railings would look like. Mr. French responded that he will try to adapt the balustrade design to use as deck railings. Mr. Greene asked where the condensers will be located. Mr. French stated that they are delineated on sheet A-1. Mr. Greene commented that he has no particular concerns with the design and felt that it has improved from the last set of drawings. He commented that the pedestrian archway needs to be better thought out. He did ask Mr. French to speak in more detail regarding the rear of Red's building. Mr. French explained that because of Mr. Drivas' concern about his foundation, their structural engineer felt that the existing building wall be cut and left as a retaining wall. Mr. Giard stated that he thought the roots of the Red Maple tree could be dangerous to the foundation. • Mr. Greene replied that Red Maple tree roots do not cause foundation problems; they are more likely to cause sewer problems. Mr. French stated that he would be willing to plant something different in that area. Mr. Jaquith commented that he felt these new plans are a big improvement from the previous plans. Mr. Jaquith also felt that the archway could be more detailed. Mr. Jaquith asked what material is being proposed for the penthouse and the tower top on the carriage house. Mr. French replied that an option would be to make them both the same material, perhaps a cementitious panel. Mr. Durand stated that he would prefer them to be constructed out of copper. He then commented that the balustrade does help the design a great deal. He asked what material would be used on the roof. Mr. French replied that material would be asphalt shingles that have a slate like appearance. Mr. Jaquith asked Mr. French to take another look at the rear entry. He felt it was weak and something better could be done. Mr. French asked if the Board felt the canopy be hard or soft. Mr. Jaquith & Mr. Durand replied that it should be hard, crisp, and bold. • DRB Minutes January 31,2002 Page 7 of 8 • Mr. Durand asked what the material of the cornice on the penthouse would be. Mr. French replied that they are considering a cementitious panel that would be like a limestone and the color would match other decorative features on the building. Mr. Giard pointed out that he felt the windows on the rear of the carriage house look asymmetrical and unbalanced. Mr. Durand and Mr. Jaquith responded that they felt they were balanced and had no problem with the current configuration. At this time, Mr. French showed the Board a sample window. It has exterior muntins and thermal pane glass; the finish is available in white, cream or bronze. Mr. Durand asked what color would be used. Mr. French stated that he is willing to discuss the color choice with the members. Mr. Walsh asked Mr. French to better explain the fenced in areas in the rear of the building. Mr. French responded that these are privacy yards for two of the units. He stated that they are a positive selling feature. Mr. Durand raised his objection to the roof decks in the front of the main building. He also stated he had a problem with the carriage house roof, specifically; the windows look like they are out of proportion. Mr. French asked if he would prefer a double hung • window. Mr. Durand stated he would have to see that option. Mr. French responded that he will revise the windows for review. Mr. Durand stated that he is very interested in seeing the specific materials, finishes and colors. He felt these plans are just a schematic review, and much more detail must be added before an approval can be rendered. Mr. Durand asked if the Central Street doors are going to be restored. Mr. French responded that they are in very bad condition and not worth restoring, so new doors will be purchased. Mr. Durand asked what are the next steps in the approval process. Mr. Luster responded that the developer is going to Planning Board next week, and will return to the DRB with revisions as soon as possible, and after the Planning Board approval this Board's recommendation; the project can go the SRA. Mr. Jaquith commented that he would prefer a lighter colored window. He asked Mr. French to study the mansard windows, the pedestrian entry and the rear entry to the main building. Mr. Durand once again expressed his concern with the three roof decks on the Central Street fagade. He felt they were inappropriate in the front of the building. He suggested that instead of deck, the windows be made larger to enhance the views, which he felt • would be more of a positive selling point than a deck. Mr. Luster responded that the developer believes that decks well the units, however he will discuss this concern with • DRB Minutes January 31,2002 Page 8 of 8 • him. He continued that he will sit down with the brokers and see if improving the views increase the value of the units, especially since constructing the deck and the interior switchback stairs do have a substantial cost. Mr. Durand asked Mr. French to explain more about the artists' space. Mr. French stated that these units have been expanded in size to house gallery, work and living space. He is working of some preliminary interior schemes, and he will be contacting the Peabody Essex Museum to discuss this concept and see if they can provide a list of possible interested parties. Mr. French thanked the Board for their input and stated that he will follow-up the comments made this evening. The Board agreed that they could meet again in two weeks if the revisions can be completed and distributed by the end of next week. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Ellen S. Dubinsky Secretary e, Salem Redevelopment Authority DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA TUESDAY,JANUARY 8, 2002 5:00 p.m. Roll Call: Paul Durand Donald Giard Chris Greene David Jaquith Fred Johnson • Agenda: Old Police Station- Plan Review esd\drb\agenda • One Salem Green • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 • Design Review Board Minutes of the Meeting Tuesday, January 8, 2002 5:00 p.m. The Design Review Board met in open session on Tuesday, January 8, 2002 at 5:00 p.m. in the third floor conference room at 120 Washington Street. Those in attendance were: Paul Durand, Dave Jaquith and Fred Johnson. SRA Executive Director Joseph Walsh was also present. Old Police Station Redevelopment Mr. Walsh began the meeting by explaining that in October of 2001, The Garvin Group withdrew as the designated developer for the Old Police Station. The SRA, when making this original designation, also designated Mr. Singleton as the second developer. The Singleton Group made a presentation to the SRA in October, at which time they were officially designated as the developer for this project. The next week, the Singleton Groupresented preliminary plans to the DRB. As a result of comments from the DRB P P �1'P , SRA, Planning Board, etc. the plans have been revised, and this week a full set of plans have been submitted to the DRB for review at this meeting. Mr. Walsh concluded by stating to the members of Historic Salem, Inc., and Main Streets that this meeting does • not have a public comment component but he wanted to make sure everyone sees the process for this project. At this time, Jack French distributed 'h size sets of plans to the DRB members. He informed the Board that he is co-developer and architect for this project and gave a history of his firm and its projects. He then showed the DRB the site plan for the project, pointing out that the dumpster for Red's Sandwich Shop has been accommodated by placing it on the developers property. He showed the DRB the rear entrance to the units and pointed out the parking spaces, which he stated meets the regulations with a 20' aisle width. He continued that as a result of a Planning Board meeting, a pedestrian entrance way has been added on Charter Street. He then pointed out that as a result of discussions regarding activity on the Central Street fagade, the two doorways on Central Street will serve as entrances for two units. Mr. French pointed out the 5' brick patio in the front basement area and the 5' iron fence along the Central St. fagade. Mr. French added that the parking space configuration has been designed to try to accommodate two parking spaces per unit, which will alleviate residents' cars parking on the street. Mr. French then showed the Board the front elevation and stated that a preservation approach has been taken which meets with the Secretary of Interior Rehabilitation Standards. Specifically, the brick will be repointed, the cast stone will be restored and the window configurations will remain and be replaced with aluminum windows with •' exterior muntins. i DRB Minutes January 8,2002 Page 2 of 5 • Mr. French showed the Board the Charter Street fagade and explained that the bottom portion of the building will be retained and a carriage house with a gable fagade will be built. It will house two units with parking underneath. He then showed the Board the small penthouse that will be constructed on the main building. It will be set back 25 feet and will be 8'6" above the parapet. It will be constructed with standing seam metal. He stated that the flagpole shown in the drawing will be removed. Mr. French concluded his presentation by showing the Board the interior views seen from the courtyard, the rear facades, and the interior layouts of the units (flats & duplexes). Mr. Jaquith commented that he liked the concept of the development. He stated one of his concerns was the flagpole, which has already been addressed. Mr. Walsh further explained that this property was owned by the City and when it was transferred to the SRA, there were certain provisions of the transfer, one being that the flagpole be removed for use at the Loring Avenue Fire Station. • Mr. Jaquith commented that he felt it was important to put a balustrade, as shown in original photographs, back on top of the building. Mr. French replied that not replacing the whole balustrade, 250 linear feet, is a cost and maintenance issue. Mr. Jaquith suggested that it could be reproduces in wood or fypon. Mr. Durand commented that he did not like the current design of the balustrade, but he objected more to the roof top material for the penthouse, especially since it will be seen by many taller, neighboring buildings. Mr. French stated that the resident across the street have seen the plans for the rooftop penthouse and they did not have any objections. Mr. Durand further expressed his concerns that the penthouse is not constructed of a residential material; it is not detailed; it is not in keeping with the architecture of the building; and it is being treated like a small element on the building, but it is a big mass. Mr. Jaquith raised his concern regarding the Charter Street elevation. He stated that the rear portion was once a one-story building, and felt the new higher fagade lacked detail. He also felt the cupola should be better designed. Mr. Durand stated that he felt the new building was not very integrated to the existing building, and needs to be better integrated to the brick. He also stated that he had many detail questions regarding this structure. • DRB Minutes January 8,2002 . Page 3 of 5 • Mr. Jaquith stated that he did not like the wood balustrade on the Charter Street elevation, and would rather not have it. Mr. Durant requested that a plan with the mechanical placements be provided to the Board. Mr. Jaquith and Mr. Durand stated that some type of change needs to be made to the base on Charter Street. Mr. French responded that he thought the consensus was to retain the lower portion of the building. Mr. Durand suggested that a different window configuration be explored, as the upper story windows are proposed to be 6/6. Mr. French asked the Board what types of details they would like. Mr. Jaquith replied that typical details, such as moldings, need to be enlarged as well as cross section details. Mr. French also expressed his disagreement with the comments regarding the penthouse. He felt this use is meant to be secondary and did not want to construct it out of clapboard. Mr. Jaquith replied that no one suggested clapboard,just an alternate material and design. Mr. Durand added that what is being proposed does not look residential. He continued that a penthouse is usually small and houses and elevator and mechanical equipment. Mr. French pointed out that he designed a copper penthouse at the Garrison Inn, which was a • tax credit project. He continued that for tax credit projects, it is not unusual to make a new element be different from the existing structure. Mr. Johnson asked why the windows in the penthouse and the new rear structure were set-up the way they were. He felt that the vocabulary on the front of the building is of a utilitarian, institutional structure and then the rear appears residential, and the switch is jarring. He continued that the penthouse windows, especially if there are interesting views, could be made bigger. Mr. French agreed to study the penthouse windows in an effort to make them bigger. Mr. Durand expressed his concern regarding the proposed decks. He feared that the neighbors would end up looking at decks being used for outside storage spaces. Mr. French replied that a no storage on deck clause can be added to the condominium documents. Mr. Singleton replied that the decks are crucial to this project, because of the views. However, he has no objection in including no storage language into the condominium documents. Mr. French asked the Board if they would rather see a solid surround around the decks. • Mr. Durand responded that he would have to see the alternative before he could respond. DRB Minutes January 8,2002 Page 4 of 5 • Mr. Jaquith expressed his concern regarding the garage door elevation shown on sheet A- 6. He felt the doors looked awkward. Mr. Durand asked what type of material will be used for the garage doors. Mr. French responded that the doors are proposed to be made of fiberglass. Mr. Walsh asked for more detail of the area next to the garage doors. Mr. French responded that this a 4' high, painted, board fence and the area behind it is a privacy yard. (Let the record show David Jaquith left the meeting at this time [6:15 p.m.].) Mr. Johnson suggested the architect take a look at the Father Mathews Building on Essex St., where a modern addition was added to the rear of an historic building. He continued by requesting the architect take another look at the Charter St. building design. He felt it looked a little busy and should be made simpler. Mr. French concurred with the idea to make the building additions more contemporary. Mr. Durand asked the architect to provide more material information for the doors, windows, new design features, etc. Mr. Durand then directed his comments toward the site plan, asking Mr. French to review • the parking configuration. Mr. French stated that there have been 14 full size spaces created, thirteen compact spaces, some of the spaces being tandem spaces, as shown on the plan. Mr. Singleton added that the 14 spaces meet the zoning requirements. Mr. Luster stated that he has spoken with Assistant City Planner Denise Sullivan at which time she stated that this project my need 15 spaces to meet zoning. This issue has recently been brought to the developer's attention and has not been resolved at this time. Mr. Durand asked about the right-of-way that exists in the rear of the building. Mr. Luster responded that their attorney has done some research and there exists a right to pass easement, but nothing is recorded or attached to the deed. However, they have met with Mr. Therieult from Bernard's and will meet with Mrs. Lally to make sure they are satisfied with the plans. Mr. Durand commented that it does not look like a truck would be able to back-up and access the dumpster. Mr. Luster responded that the dumpster does not belong to the project it has been placed on our property to accommodate the owner of Red's Sandwich Shop. Mr. Durand stated that he just wanted to make sure the dumpster can be serviced in this location. Mr. Durand expressed his concern regarding cars making the turning radius to get into the carriage house garages. Mr. French responded that there is a 20-foot aisle. At this time, the Board briefly reviewed the landscaping plan. (Please note, the DRB's • landscape architect was not present, so further discussion will take place when Mr. Greene can be present.) DRB Minutes January 8,2002 Page 5 of 5 • Mr. Johnson expressed his concern regarding the many vocabularies around the building facades. He felt the Charter Street fagade needs to be simpler. Mr. French asked the Board if they felt that the existing ground brick be maintained. Mr. Johnson replied that maintaining the ground portion is important. Mr. Durand expressed his concern regarding the mass of the penthouse addition. Mr. Johnson pointed out that the penthouse and the decks are not symmetrical to the building and asked why. Mr. French replied that this is because of the way the interior for those units laid out. Mr. Johnson suggested making them symmetrical. Mr. Durand asked the architect to explore alternatives to the proposed roof railing with a balustrade more in keeping with the one that was removed from the original building. He continued that the City/SRA gave this building to the developer and we should get back a nicely renovated building with details such as the original balustrade. Mr. Durand asked what the roof materials will be. Mr. French replied it would be a • membrane roof with slate or asphalt. Mr. Johnson asked what would be seen through the double door entranceways on Central Street. Mr. French responded that the doors open up into the units so there would have to be some sort of window treatment that would be outlined in the condominium documents or the glass could be etched. Mr. French thanked the Board for their input and stated he will begin to work on redesigns based on the comments made at this meeting. Mr. Walsh pointed that one issue that was not raised in detail this evening was the proposed basement/patio area on Central Street, which can be reviewed at the next meeting. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Ellen S. Dubinsky Secretary r Salem Redevelopment Authority DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA WEDNESDAY DECEMBER 5, 2001 5:00 p.m. Roll Call: Paul Durand Donald Giard • Chris Greene David Jaquith Fred Johnson Meredith Reed Agenda: 1. 60 Washington Street—Storefront Paint Color 2. Creative Celebrations— 14 New Derby Street—Sign Application 3. 282 Derby Street- Fagade Review One Salem Green • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MINUTES Wednesday, December 7, 2001 The Design Review Board met in open session on Wednesday, December 7, 2001 at 5:00 p.m. in the third floor conference room at 120 Washington Street. Those in attendance were Paul Durand, Don Giard, Chris Greene and David Jaquith. 60 Washington Street—First Floor Fagade Painting Mr. Giardresented an application from Brian McKay,p pp y, owner of 60 Washington Street, to paint the wooden trim of the building on the first floor from the existing brown to California Paint color#8126N-Racing Green. Mr. Durand suggested a test patch be painted for the Board to review, as he had some concern with the color choice. He also asked Mr. Giard to clarify with Mr. McKay if the sign band itself would be painted green or only the trim below. Mr. Greene stated that he felt the storefronts should be integrated with the whole building, and if the trim color is going to be changed, it should be throughout the whole building, so the building reads as one entity. Mr. Durand and Mr. Jaquith agreed. • The Board tabled this discussion and asked Mr. Giard to inform Mr. McKay that they would like to see a test color on the building, and to inform him that the Board would prefer to see the entire building trim painted. Creative Celebrations— 14 New Derby Street—Sign Application Ms. Jane Naggar, business owner, appeared before the DRB with an application to erect a 30" x 96" sign above the windows of her storefront as shown in the submitted photographs. The sign is constructed of Lexan with blue vinyl letters. Mr. Greene asked how the sign would be attached and recommended a wooden border/molding should be attached all around the sign and it should be painted blue to match the vinyl letter color. Mr. Durand stated that the sign border be sealed or that a small gap be left for the water to drip so it does not freeze underneath the sign. He also stated that stainless steel screws and finished washers be used to mount the sign. Mr. Greene made a motion to approve the application as submitted with the following conditions: A border molding should be applied to the sign and with depth enough so that you cannot see through the back of the sign. The molding should be wood and painted blue to match the sign lettering. The molding should be sealed or be constructed to leave capacity for water to • drip through to prevent freezing. The sign should be erected with stainless steel screws and finished washers. Mr. Durand seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. 282 Derby Street—Facade Renovation Let the record show that David Jaquith recused himself as DRB member at this time. Mr. Jaquith, project architect, showed the Board the exterior plans for the building located at 282 Derby Street. He explained that the building owner, Mr. George Osgood, is renovating the upper floors to be used as housing units. The exterior renovations are minimal and included the addition of a canopy over the Liberty Street entrance (awning sample provided) and window changes (operable sash windows) to meet ventilation codes. The inside floor plan consists of seven, one-bedroom units. Mr. Greene made a motion to approve the facade renovation plans for 282 Derby Street as submitted. Mr. Durand seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submitted, • Ellen S. Dubinsky Secretary • Salem Redevelopment Authority DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA TUESDAY, OCTOBER 16, 2001 5:00 p.m. Roll Call: Paul Durand Donald Giard Chris Greene • David Jaquith Fred Johnson Meredith Reed Agenda: 1. Old Police Station Renovation—Philip Singleton 2. Brother's Cafd & Mini Mart—Sign Application 3. Asahi Restaurant—Lafayette Street—Continuation of Fagade Review • One Salem Green • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 Design Review Board Minutes of the Meeting • Tuesday, October 16, 2001 5:00 p.m. The Design Review Board met in open session on Tuesday, October 16, 2001 at 5:00 p.m. in the third floor conference room at 120 Washington Street. Those in attendance were: Paul Durand, Don Giard, and Meredith Reed. Old Police Station—Preliminary Review Mr. Jack French, project architect and co-developer with Mr. Singleton, presented conceptual renderings/preliminary plans for their residential development of the Old Police Station on Central Street. The plans call for a fourteen unit development with twelve units in the main building and two units in the proposed, newly constructed carriage house. He continued that the rear brick walls on Charter Street have been saved to keep the street continuity, and the upper portion of the carriage house will be wood frame construction. The site plan calls for twenty- eight parking spaces, some of which will be tandem spaces. He indicated that he existing curb cut on Charter Street will remain and be used as the access to the parking area. Mr. French continued that the brick on the main building will be restored and the window configurations will remain and be replaced with aluminum windows with external muntins. He stated that a small penthouse addition will be added to the main building, and will be set back on • the roof 24' from the front fagade. He then stated that patio areas below grade are being planned, as well as patios in the rear. He stated that the landscaping plans are not finalized. He added that the mix of units will be flats of 1,000 to 1,200 square feet and duplexes of 1,200 to 1,400 square feet. He then explained that the carriage house addition would be a wood frame building. Mr. Giard asked for building elevations. Mr. French responded that they are being drawn up now. He continued that this meeting is to get a better understanding what the DRB will need and what their reactions are to the plan. Mr. Luster informed the Board that he hopes the architect can provide the DRB with as much information as possible and respond quickly to the Board's comments, so this review process can be completed within the next four to five weeks. Mr. Singleton informed the Board that the review timeframe is crucial so that demolition can happen and the interior building work be started in December with the goal of being able to show the units by the spring. Mr. Jaquith informed the developer that one issue of importance to him would be to see the balustrade put back on the building. Mr. Durand stated that the window details and material samples, especially for the carriage house, patio railing details, etc. are important elements he would like to see. Mr. Giard stated that a site plan with detail dimensions, existing & new curbing and sidewalk areas, paving materials, detail landscaping, and signage need to be • submitted. Mr. Jaquith asked the price of the units. Mr. French responded that currently they plan to marketed for $275,000-$300,000. Mr. Luster informed the Board that he has spoken with Mr. John Drivas regarding not disturbing • his building foundation and the placement of his dumpster. He stated that he has also spoke with Mr. Tetrault from Bernard's Jewelers regarding the rear entrance to his building. He concluded that the concerns of these two abutters will be addressed. Brother's Cafe—South Harbor Garage— Sign Application Mr. Ken McTeague from Concept Signs presented an application for a sign for Brother's Cafe. The sign has a green background with white letters accented in gray and a green border. It is constructed out of MDO board and will not have any illumination. The sign will fit under the curved awning at the entrance to the store. Mr. Jaquith asked how the sign would be fastened. Mr. McTeague responded that the 1" steel plates will be used and extend upward with a ring and an eyebolt through the canopy. Mr. Durand suggested that it would be better to fasten the sign through the structure. He expressed that the connection of the sign is very important and he wanted to visit the site before approving an affixation method. He also stated that it is important that the sign match the curve and suggested that the awning curve be traced with cardboard and the sign curve be made to match. At this point, Mr. McTeague showed the Board window signs that will be lettering and drawings of items for sale such as pastry, expresso, and ice cream. The Board took no action on this application. They stated that a site visit be made to the building • to study the affixation and that the sign maker trace the curve and make a cardboard template of the sign shape. Asahi—Lafayette Street—Continuation of PaGade Renovation Mr. Jaquith showed the Board a new drawing of the fagade elevations with brick, which will match the existing, wood, bay structure and a canvas awning. The bay scheme will continue the whole length of the building and there will be a light on each column. The Board endorsed the new concept and would await the submission of details. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Ellen S. Dubinsky Secretary • r a Salem Redevelopment Autl ority DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA THURSDAY, OCTOBER 4, 2001 5:00 p.m. Roll Call: i/Paul Durand i/bonald Giard • Chris Greene i/David Jaquith Fred Johnson ,,,Meredith Reed Agenda: (D Brother's Cafe & Mini Mart-280 Derby Street(South Harbor Garage)- Sign Application 2 228 Essex Street(Shribman Building)-Fagade Renovation 3. 282 Derby Street (Osgood Building)-Fagade Renovation 4. Asahi Restaurant-Lafayette Street-Continuation of Fagade Review ATS tiVN[T� — TR1N ��tr.� a.tl�cff/�i DSV io , PV-V- Ma,1,w4 P-AA-sem ) 6. 1L (-1-VR4g*VVXs X17 t w/WAS — 1l,aY AOOac/1ro1/hf� Y. �7> DJ. —' a�3. C9p'�v ►v7NDr.Ui� —� Ntt��,a? j' One Salem Green • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 APVMIiIS PbLIJT b//(.T --� D�yJt✓t�j QhA`� b. PA�Ih'.1L D. hF.�ssPliAN J s1Gi,(/ — 1NT�-9aNnr,1� G.2'F CLv1LL �A�y/� B/bc.� llUltUtTw9Z�� ¢�,ovNtt�tJ J N LtcrPort t'tk 8. 12.�v�p�/'L2TZ s� c,u,�bb'CS W14/ is,1.N'S5 Ddb • wll—L cotter abAl3r g4A.f,o AW Lti wtWDd vS VA)k)AA/4Aa �a��Y • Design Review Board— 10/4 Meeting 1. 280 Derby Street - Brother's Cafe & Mini Mart Ken McTague from Concept Signs presented plans for exterior building signage. Proposal included two neon signs at the main entry and 6 vinyl window graphic signs. Board members felt that neon was not appropriate for the area. The applicant was encouraged to explore other alternatives. Ken McTague proposed a sign at the comer of the existing metal canopy in place of the neon signs. The members felt that this would have better visibility and would be more compatible with the building and the area. The applicant will submit a new drawing next week for review. 2. 228 Essex Street—Neal and Newhall Annex Dave Pabich presented plans for the exterior rehabilitation of 228 Essex Street. Work in this phase will include the repair of existing windows and exterior wood detailing. The existing paint color of"atrium white"was proposed. Dave Pabich stated that a future phase would include the installation of exterior storm windows. David Jaquith and Paul Durand felt that storm windows would be inappropriate and recommended the use of replacement windows that match the existing windows. The applicants expressed their desire to restore the existing windows. Paul Durand suggested interior storm windows as an alternative to exterior, but warned of the limitations for residential use. The DRB recommended approval of the application with the proposed "atrium white" - #60 paint color. 3. 231 Washington Street Dennis Gray presented plans for a commercial storefront renovation at 231 Washington Street. Fagade renovations will include brick veneer, aluminum windows, new entries and illuminated signage. The presentation included existing photographs, new fagade elevation, window specification, and a sample of proposed brick. Individual storefront signs will be submitted to the DRB at a later date. The DRB recommended the approval of the application, with the condition that the applicant will submit plans to the SRA for individual storefront signage. 4. 282 Derby Street—Osgood Building David Jaquith presented preliminary plans for a fagade renovation of 282 Derby Street. Improvements are part of a residential conversion for the second level of the building. The proposal includes new awning windows, new aluminum glass windows and doors, new door canopies and light fixtures. The applicant will present final plans including window details, color samples and lighting specifications at the next DRB meeting. 5. 83 Lafayette Street—Asahi Restauraunt David Jaquith presented two alternatives for the fagade renovation of 83 Lafayette Street. The first alternative, which had been previously reviewed by the DRB, • included a new metal canopy roof, two gable roof forms, new wood-framed storefront windows, stone veneer detailing and signage. The second proposal included a new • brick veneer fagade with vertical bays, wood-framed storefront windows, signage and exterior light fixtures. It was determined that the second alternative was more consistent with the SRA urban design guidelines. The applicant will present more detailed drawings and specifications of the second alternative to the DRB. • • r Salem • Redevelopment ME Authority DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 6, 2001 5:00 p.m. Roll Call: Paul Durand Donald Giard • Chris Greene David Jaquith Fred Johnson Meredith Reed Agenda: 1. Asahi Restaurant—Lafayette Street—Continuation of Fagade Review 2. Hong Kong Restaurant—28 Norman Street—Continuation of Sign Application 3. White Hen Pantry—28 Norman Street— Sign Application 4. Practical Magic, Inc. — 190 Essex Street— Sign Application 5. Maria's Sweet Somethings—26 Front Street—Sign Application 6. 53 Charter Street—Preliminary Discussion—Building Renovation • One Salem Green • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 } • DRB MINUTES The Design Review Board met in open session on Thursday, September 6, 2001 at 5:00 p.m. in the third floor conference room at 120 Washington Street. Those in attendance were: Don Giard, Chris Greene, Dave Jaquith and Meredith Reed. Practical Magic, Inc. — 190 Essex Street—Sign Application Ms. Jody Cabot appeared before the DRB with an application to erect a wall sign over the entryway to her business. The proposed sign is 26" high and 82" long. The sign will be centered in the granite panel (30" x 90") over the doorway. The sign's border is a gold-leaf, wooden picture frame that will be weather proofed with a beige/parchment background, and painted burgundy (Practical Magic) and black (Jody Cabot's, A Victorian Spirit Parlour) lettering. The 'Practical Magic' font style is Perigord and the other letters are in the High Tower font. The Pantone (flat) color numbers are 123, 228, and 454. Mr. Greene made a motion to approve the design as presented with the condition that the length of the sign be reduced to line up with the edges of sidelights of the doorway (which will reduce the height). The sign height should not exceed 18", leaving six inches of revealed granite on the • above and below the sign. Mr. Giard seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. (Please note: Applicant submitted revised design that meets all the DRB conditions.) Maria's Sweet Somethings—26 Front Street—Sign Application Ms. Maria Harris appeared before the DRB with an application to erect a 24" x 32", double- sided, right angle sign from the existing bracket on the corner of her storefront at 26 Front Street. The sign will have a chestnut colored border/frame with a vinyl applied purple background and gold lettering. The 'M' logo on the sign(7" high) will be raised. The font style for 'Maria's . Sweet Somethings' is Shelley Andante and the letter height is 5 inches. The font style for 'Wicked Good Confections' is Optima Medium with a letter height of 2 inches. Ms. Reed made a motion to approve the sign application as submitted. Mr. Greene seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Let the record show Dave Jaquith arrived at this time. Hong Kong Restaurant—28 Norman Street— Sign Application Mr. Giard informed the Board that after a design consultation with Pat DeLeo,the property owner, and the restaurant owners, a revised sign drawing is now being submitted for review. The sign is 20" high and 194" long and will be installed under the two existing signs located on • • the wooden entrance canopy (DeLeo's& Salem Photo). The illuminated sign will have a white background with red letters and the two Chinese symbols on each side of the sign will be green. Mr. Greene asked if the top of the new sign will touch the bottom of the existing signs and would it fill the entire length. Mr. Giard replied in the affirmative. Mr. Greene stated that there should be white area all the way around the sign. Mr. Giard stated that the circle will be made smaller. Ms. Reed asked if all the symbols would be green. Mr. Giard responded that the two symbols would be green and the 'King' would be red. Mr. Greene made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Ms. Reed seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. White Hen Pantry—28 Norman Street—Sign Application An application was presented to the DRB to re-install White Hen Pantry channel letters as was existing at 28 Norman Street. The letters and the fagade were damaged in a fire. The letters are 16" high with white acrylic faces and brown aluminum returns. The total sign length is 190 inches. • Ms. Reed made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Mr. Greene seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Asahi—Continuation of Fapade Renovation Mr. Jaquith recused himself as a DRB member to present this application. Mr. Jaquith showed the Board updated plans of the fagade, pointing out that the stucco on the corner has been removed and will be refinished with brick. Mr. Greene asked if there is brick under the stucco. Mr. Jaquith responded that he is pretty sure that there is existing brick, but if not it will be installed. Mr. Greene commented that the stone being proposed looks rustic and stated that it should have more of a contemporary expression. Mr. Jaquith stated that he had reviewed the adjacent building and felt there was no viable way to tie this design into the building next door. Mr. Giard expressed his concern with the new renovation having little or no relationship to the building next door and continued that it is part of the DRB's purview to ensure compatibility with existing buildings. Mr. Greene suggested that maybe the window lines could be made to match the other building to try to introduce consistency. Mr. Giard suggested that the parapet line could be made to match other building. Mr. Jaquith stated that he will review these suggestions. • t • Grimshaw House—Charter Street—Renovations Mr. H. B. Peabody appeared before the DRB with plans to restore the Grimshaw House on Charter Street. He stated that he cannot restore the entire building at one time and plans to restore the building step by step. The first portion of the renovation is to restore the street facade and west end fagade. At this time he is asking for approval to demolition the front stoop and replace it with a cast cement front step and poured concrete curb with granite. Mr. Peabody went on to explain the history of the house and showed photographs of the building during different periods in history. Mr. Giard stated that detailed architectural drawings must be submitted for review and further stated that the SRA& DRB would prefer to review a comprehensive building restoration rather than approve pieces of work. Mr. Giard stated that he would draft a letter to Mr. Peabody explaining what type of detail plans he needs to submit. There being no further business,the meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Ellen S. Dubinsky • Secretary • r-, ., k Salem ® Redevelopment Authority DRB RECOMMENDATIONS (from meeting held on September 6, 2001) Practical Magic, Inc.— 190 Essex Street— Sign Application Ms. Jody Cabot appeared before the DRB with an application to erect a wall sign over the entryway to her business. The proposed sign is 26" high and 82" long. The sign will be centered in the granite panel (30" x 90") over the doorway. The sign's border is a gold-leaf, wooden picture frame that will be weather proofed with a beige/parchment background, and painted burgundy(Practical Magic) and black(Jody Cabot's, A Victorian Spirit Parlour) lettering. The 'Practical Magic' font style is Perigord and the other letters are in the High Tower font. The • Pantone (flat)color numbers are 123, 228, and 454. DRB RECOMMENDATION: Approve the design as presented with the condition that the length of the sign be reduced to line up with the edges of sidelights of the doorway (which will reduce the height). The sign height should not exceed 18", leaving six inches of revealed granite on the above and below the sign. *Applicant submitted revised design that meets all the DRB conditions. Maria's Sweet Somethings—26 Front Street—Sign Application Ms. Maria Harris appeared before the DRB with an application to erect a 24" x 32", double- sided, right angle sign from the existing bracket on the corner of the her storefront at 26 Front Street. The sign will have a chestnut colored border/frame with a vinyl applied purple background and gold lettering. The 'M'logo on the sign(7" high)will be raised. The font style for'Maria's Sweet Somethings' is Shelley Andante and the letter height is 5 inches. The font style for'Wicked Good Confections' is Optima Medium with a letter height of 2 inches. DRB RECOMMENDATION: Approve as submitted. • One Salem Green • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 `0 Hong Kone Restaurant—28 Norman Street—Sign Anolication • After a design consultation with Don Giard, Pat DeLeo,theroPettY owner, and the restaurant P owners, a revised sign drawing was reviewed by the DRB. The sign is 20" high and 194" long and will be installed under the two existing signs located on the wooden entrance canopy (DeLeo's& Salem Photo). The illuminated sign will have a white background with red letters and the two Chinese symbols on each side of the sign will be green. DRB RECOMMENDATION: Approve as submitted. White Hen Pantry—28 Norman Street—Sign Application An application was presented to the DRB to re-install White Hen Pantry channel letters as was existing at 28 Norman Street. The letters and the fagade were damaged in a fire. The letters are 16" high with white acrylic faces and brown aluminum returns. The total sign length is 190 inches. DRB RECOMMENDATION: Approve as submitted. • • Salem • Redevelopment Authority DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA THURSDAY, AUGUST 2, 2001 5:00 p.m. Roll Call: Paul Durand Donald Giard • Chris Greene David Jaquith Fred Johnson Meredith Reed AgenTq{ �C) out 1. Children's Museum—203=209 Rear Essex Street- Sign Application 2. Sticks & Stones—172Essex Street—Sign Application 3. Hong Kong Restaurant—28 Norman Street—Sign Application_-�^� 4. The Bagel Place—Museum Place—Sin Applie t — r� 5. Asahi Restaurant—Lafayette Street—Continuation of Fagade Review 6. Old Police Station—Central Street—Project Presentation • One Salem Green • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 • DRB MINUTES The Design Review Board met in open session on Thursday, August 2, 2001 at 5:00 p.m. in the third floor conference room at 120 Washington Street. Those in attendance were: Don Giard, Dave Jaquith and Meredith Reed. Lobster Shanty— Salem Marketplace—Rope Design Mr. William Kelly appeared before the Board with two rope samples to be used to cordon off his outside eating area. He explained that the white rope presented is the same rope that was used previously and showed the Board a sample of how that rope weathered over the past ten years. He also showed a green sample rope. Ms. Reed made a motion to approve the green rope sample as submitted. Mr. Jaquith seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Children's Museum—203-209R Essex Street—Sign Application Ms. Mary Sholds, owner of the Children's Museum appeared before the Board with a request to erect an additional 34"x 15' banner on the left side of her facade at the corner closest to Old Town Hall. She also explained that mechanical supports for the existing banners will be changed so the banners can be held in place with more rigidity, as originally proposed. • Mr. Giard stated that this additional banner may exceed the square footage allowed for signs, but he believed that an exception could be made in this instance citing that the location of this business is not prominent, and there is difficulty locating this site. Ms. Reed made a motion to approve the banner application as submitted. Mr. Giard seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Sticks & Stones—Museum Place— Sign Application Ms. Trudy Stavros and Ms. Jennifer Stavros appeared before the DRB with an application to erect a 15" x 24' along the canopy valance over the entrance to their business. The sign will have a green aluminum background, which will cover the existing holes in the awning. Color samples were submitted for the background, lettering and graphics. Ms. Reed made a motion to approve the sign application as submitted. Mr. Jaquith seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Hong Kong—28 Norman Street—Sign Application The owners of Hong Kong restaurant presented an application to the Board. The application called for a 2 '/� ' x 8' aluminum light box with a yellow background and red lettering and green Chinese symbols. The sign is proposed to be located above the existing Salem Photo & DeLeo's sign. • Mr. Giard expressed his concern that the placement of the sign will exacerbate an already awkward building sign problem, and continued that the sign face on the building would be more appropriate from a design standpoint. Another suggestion Mr. Giard made was to place the sign box below the other two business signs. Mr. Giard stated that he would like to arrange a meeting g with the building owner and the tenant to discuss alternative sign placement. The Board concurred with Mr. Giard's suggestion. The Bagel Place—Museum Place Mall—Preliminary Sign Discussion Mr. Giard informed the Board that he met with the owner of the Bagel Place regarding a request for additional signage. Mr. Nadeau, business owner, is requesting an illuminated sign on the Church Street fagade. Ms. Reed expressed her concern with the yellow background of the light box. She asked if illumination was allowed would the owner consider reducing or removing the amount of yellow in the sign. She also suggested that there be a site visit to the business to better understand why the owner feels an illuminated sign is necessary. Asahi Restaurant—Lafayette Street—Fagade Review David Jaquith recused himself as a DRB member for this discussion item. • Mr. Jaquith presented updated plans for the faFade renovation for the Asahi restaurant. He informed the Board that the roof will have lead coated copper squares that sit on a slight slope and sign will be individual letters that will be installed on pins to appear that they are floating on the building. He stated that he took the glass block out and replaced it with wood panels, as shown on the plan. He continued that everything will be removed from the side wall, which faces Wendy's, and Asahi Restaurant will be painted on using Japanese letters. He stated the telephone wires in the rear of the building will be relocated. Mr. Giard asked how the new building facade will line up with the building next door. Mr. Jaquith stated that it is difficult to match the lines in the other building, but he stated he would draw it into the plan and take a look at what he can do. Mr. Giard referred him to page 70 in the Heritage Plaza East Plan that talks about unity and compatibility with adjacent structures. Old Police Station Redevelopment—Garvin Group Ms. Meredith Reed recused herself from discussion and vote of this agenda item. Architect Dennis Gray showed the Board a photograph of his grandfather's award winning drawing of the then Courthouse/Police Station in 1912. He stated that plans for the new hotel include restoring the building and reinstalling a balustrade similar to the one in the photograph. Mr. Gray then showed the Board an elevation of the new building. Plans including building additional stories and using the same style arch windows and banding details. He stated that . signage would be a small plaque of die cut brushed aluminum. It will be clean cut, subtle and unobtrusive. Mr. Gray then showed the Board the proposed site plan and interior layouts. The • plans call for a courtyard, which will be paved with brick and cobblestone. Mr. Gray showed the Board the ramp down parking entrance to the garage and the entrance to the restaurant. Mr. Giard stated that the Board would need more details to properly review the project, such as window details, standard construction drawings, elevations for all sides of the building and garage entrance, and a more detailed site plan. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Ellen S. Dubinsky Secretary • • 120 Washington Street,Salem,MA 01970 978-745-9595,ext.311 978-740-0404,fax Salem Authority• Redevelopment Fax To: Fred Johnson—741-9012 From: Ellen Dubinsky Chris Greene—617-536-0626 Paul Durand—741-0240 Don Giard—740-0404 Meredith Reed—744-1588 David Jaquith—927-0068 • Fax: Pages: cover sheet Phone: Date: July 23,2001 Re: DRB Site Visits CC: ❑ Urgent ❑ For Review ❑Please Comment X Please Reply ❑ Please Recycle Site Visit - - Wednesday, July 25, 2001 at 5: 15 p.m. We will meet at DeLeo's on Norman Street and proceed to Dracula's Castle, _ Asahi, the Old Police Station, Psychic Readings by Leeza, the Coffee Merchant, and the Higginson Block. Please call me to confirm your attendance. • Thankyou. Ellen Salem • Redevelopment Authority DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA THURSDAY, JUNE 28, 2001 5:00 p.m. Roll Call: Paul Durand Donald Giard • Chris Greene David Jaquith Fred Johnson Meredith Reed Agenda: 1. 6-26 Front Street—Painting Application 2. Heritage Bank—Washington Street- Sign Application(Continuation) 3. Dracula's Castle-90 Lafayette Street—Sign Application(Continuation) 4. The Coffee Merchant— 196 Essex Street—Request for Change to Cafe Permit (Continuation) 5. Lobster Shanty— Salem Marketplace—Outdoor Cafd Permit(Continuation) 6. Higginson Block— 10 Derby Square—Sign Application and Paint Colors 7. Hair Designs by Laura—Washington Street—Sign Application 8. Psychic Readings by Leeza— 178 Essex Street—Sign Application • One Salem Green • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 One Salem Green,Salem,MA 01970 978-745-9595,ext.311 978-740-0404,fax Redevelopment Authority Fax To: Fred Johnson—741-9012 From: Ellen Dubinsky Chris Greene—617-536-0626 Paul Durand—741-0240 Don Giard—740-0404 Meredith Reed—744-1588 David Jaquith—927-0068 Fax: Pages: cover sheet Phone: Date: June 22,2001 Re: DRB Meeting CC: ❑ Urgent ❑ For Review ❑ Please Comment ❑ Please Reply ❑ Please Recycle DRB Meeting Thursday, June 28 2001 at 5:00 pm. We will meet in the conference room at 120 Washington Street. We will also visit the DeLeo's site at 28 Norman Street. Please call me to confirm your attendance. Thank you. Ellen • • DRB MINUTES The Design Review Board met in open session on Thursday, June 28, 2001 at 5:00 p.m. in the third floor conference room at 120 Washington Street. Those in attendance were: Paul Durand, Don Giard (late) Chris Greene, Dave Jaquith, Fred Johnson and Meredith Reed. SRA Executive Director Joseph Walsh was also present. Heritage Bank—71 Washington Street— Sign Amendment Mr. Bud Robitaille from Metro Sign appeared before the DRB requesting an amendment to the background color of the Church Street Sign. The original application called for a 16" x 11'2" sign with a black background and gold lettering. The request is to change the background color to a blue that matches the window trim color of the Bank. Mr. Greene made a motion to approve the amendment as presented. Ms. Reed seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Retail Storefronts—79-87 Washington Street—Sign Application Mr. Robitaille appeared before the Board with more details for the storefront signs along Washington Street. He reviewed the sign package being proposed and then showed the Board a • black bracket that will be used for all the right angle signs. He also showed the placement of the right angle signs on the columns next to the storefronts, this position has been chosen so as not to ruin any of the decorative molding elements on the building. Each right angle sign will hang 71/2"/2" - 8' from grade. Mr. Greene made a motion to approve the bracket design, location of bracket to be centered on the columns with the sign being hung 8' from grade as mandated in the SRA sign manual and no larger than 8 square feet. The DRB also recommended that the typeface for the fapade signs be scaled down to reveal more background space, and a final sign plan with the correct business names will be submitted for final approval. Ms. Reed seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Office Entrance - 81 Washington Street— Sign Application Mr. Robitaille appeared before the Board with a revised drawing of the office entrance sign, per the DRB suggestions. Mr. Robitaille showed an example of a sign with a metal face that has been routed out so the translucent letters are pushed through and internally illuminated. The sides of letters create a"halo" effect. The opening is 82" and the sign will be 60"wide. Mr. Durand recommended that the lettering be gold. Mr. Greene stated that the number 81 is too large. Mr. Johnson agreed. Mr. Greene • recommended that the lettering be no higher than 9 inches. • Ms. Reed made a motion to approve the 81 Washington Street sign with a black metal background and gold letter with clear sides to create the "halo" effect and scale down the number 81 from a 12"to a 9" letter. Mr. Johnson seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. 6-26 Front Street—Paint Colors Mr. Bill Goldberg, building owner, appeared before the Board with an application to paint all the woodwork on the building at 6-26 Front Street with `California Paints Sandy Bluff color. Mr. Greene made a motion to approve the application as presented. Ms. Reed seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Asahi— 83 Lafayette Street—Fagade Renovation Mr. Jaquith recused himself as Board member for this discussion. SRA Executive Director Joseph Walsh informed the Board that the SRA has granted a loan to the Asahi Restaurant to be used toward fagade improvements, and expressed the SRA's concern to the DRB regarding the current plan not to remove the upper brown aluminum band from the fagade. • At this time, David Jaquith, architect,presented elevation plans for the Asahi restaurant renovation to the former Early Radio Building at 83 Lafayette Street. The plan calls for stone veneer, wood panels and glass block. The upper brown aluminum band will remain. Mr. Johnson commented regarding the general flatness/lack of dimension of the fagade. Ms. Reed commented that the new'teak' looking design looks out of place with the existing aluminum band. Mr. Jaquith thanked the Board for their comments and stated he would return with updated drawings. Dracula's Castle—90 Lafayette Street— Sign Application& Fapade Alterations Attorney Joe Correnti and Marshall Tripoli appeared before the DRB with a revised sign application. They informed the Board that the linear frontage of their building is 59 feet. They also informed the Board that the upper existing right angle frame will be removed, and showed a revised drawing for the lower frame (5'x7'). They requested that the remaining frame be allowed to be moved up one foot. The new sign the words "Dracula's Castle will be raised and the remaining text and design will be air brushed. The proposed two fagade signs were also reduced in size from 2' x 15' to 18"x 8'. These signs have a black background with raised gold letters. Gooseneck lighting is also proposed. • Let the record show that Ms. Reed left the meeting at this time. 2 • Mr. Greene recommended that the lightning effect over the wording Dracula's Castle be removed, which will give the business name a much crisper effect. He also recommended that the word Castle be moved up. Let the record show that Mr. Johnson left the meeting at this time, and Mr. Giard arrived at the meeting at this time. The Board unanimously voiced their concern over the facade changes made to the building and requested that a site visit be held. Mr. Greene made a motion to approve the revised sign application for one right angle sign and two fagade signs with the condition on the right angle sign that the lightning effect on Dracula's Castle be removed to make the sign crisper, and the word `Castle' be moved up. Mr. Jaquith seconded the motion, all were in favor,motion so carried. No action was taken on the front and rear fagade alterations. A site visit will be scheduled. The Coffee Merchant— 196 Essex Street—Cafe Permit Mr. Dan Elwell, owner of the Coffee Merchant, appeared before the Board with a scaled drawing of his cafe plan, as requested by the DRB at the last meeting and a specification sheet for his proposed hot dog cart. The plan calls for seven tables (two of which will be located in the atrium • are), two umbrellas. The plan shows 4'-5' of public walking space between the tables. Mr. Giard asked if the condominium association approves of the tables in the atrium area. Mr. Elwell responded that the condominium association does not have a problem with the outside seating; however, they requested that no furniture be stored outside. Mr. Elwell informed the Board that he stores the furniture inside his shop every evening. Mr. Greene made a motion to accept the caf6 plan as presented. Mr. Jaquith seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Let the record show that Mr. Greene left the meeting at this time. Lobster Shanty— Salem Marketplace—Caf6 Permit Mr. William Kelly appeared before the Board with a sample of a new planter box to cordon off his outside eating area. The planter will be painted green to match the roof color and casters were affixed to the bottom. A rope will be threaded eyehooks attached to the vertical poles in the planter. There will be eleven planters. Mr. Giard suggested a thick maritime style rope be used. Mr. Durand asked the applicant to provide the Board with a rope sample. • 3 • Mr. Jaquith made a motion to approve the planter as presented and required a sample of the proposed rope be provided to the DRB for final approval. Mr. Durand seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Higginson Block— 10 Derby Square—Sign Application and Paint Colors Ms. Carol Whalen appeared before the Board with several applications for the Higginson Block Building. She informed the Board that a test paint color of bronze plum has been applied to the doorway on the south side of the building for the Board's review. She submitted a color photograph of the test area. Secondly, she presented an application to erect a 3' x 5' Salem Evening News logo, white nylon flag to be hung at a 45 degree angle on a 2" aluminum pole, location as shown on the submitted photograph. Mr. Durand asked what color the pole would be. Ms. Whalen responded that she will make it whatever color the Board requires. Mr. Durand stated that the pole should be black. Thirdly, she presented an application for lettering on the 10 Derby Square window and door area, as shown in the submitted drawings and photographs. Fourthly, she showed the Board a photograph of the building in the Higginson Block alley where • the Salem Evening News would like to replicate their sign that is on the Derby Square side of the building. The sign is 14" x 13' and will be centered over the storefront as depicted. Lastly, the Salem Evening News is requesting that lettering be placed on the closed glass door by the handicap entrance to instruct patrons that the handicap entrance is ahead. Mr. Durand made a motion to approve the application as presented with the condition that the flag be hung from a black pole and it be lowered so as not to obscure the fagade sign. Mr. Giard seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Hair Designs by Laura—237 Washington Street—Sign Application Ms. Sue Manganiello from Sue's Signs appeared before the Board with an application to replace a 2' x 12' temporary banner with a 3' x 10' aluminum sign over the storefront at 237 Washington Street. The sign will be painted and have a green marbleized background with silver letters and a turquoise letter outline and black shadows. Mr. Durand recommended that the telephone number be made smaller and all the lettering be scaled down so there is more background space, which will make the sign more readable. Mr. Durand also recommended that the sign be centered between the top of the canopy and the top of the building edge. • Mr. Giard recommended that the silver letters proposed be changed to white, which will also help with the readability of the sign. 4 • Mr. Durand made a motion to approve the sign with condition that the telephone number be made smaller, the letters be scaled down to reveal more background,the silver letters be done in white and the sign be centered between the top of the canopy and the top of the building edge. A revised drawing must be submitted for final approval. Mr. Giard seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Psychic Readings by Leeza— 178 Essex Street— Sign Application Mr. Donald Mitchell, business owner, appeared before the Board with an application to approve signs that have already been installed. The fagade sign consist of individual formed letters attached to the green awning valance. The letters are 12"high and 5' long. There are also two triangular signs attached to the brick columns, as shown in the photograph. These signs are 3' x 2' and have a black background with black letters. Mr. Durand stated that he would like to visit the site before taking any action on this application. The Board concurred. A site visit to the property be scheduled as soon as possible. There being no further action, the meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submitted, • Ellen S. Dubinsky Secretary • 5 Salem • Redevelopment Authority DRB RECOMMENDATIONS (from meeting held on June 28, 2001) Heritage Bank—71 Washington Street—Sien Amendment Mr. Bud Robitaille from Metro Sign appeared before the DRB requesting an amendment to the background color of the Church Street Sign. The original application called for a 16" x 11'2". sign with a black background and gold lettering. The request is to change the background color to a blue that matches the window trim color of the Bank. DRB RECOMMENDATION: Approve as presented. Office Entrance - 81 Washington Street— Sign Application Mr. Robitaille appeared before the Board with a revised drawing of the office entrance sign, per the DRB suggestions. Mr. Robitaille showed an example of a sign with a metal face that has been routed out so the translucent letters are pushed through and internally illuminated. The sides of letters create a"halo" effect. The opening is 82" and the sign will be 60"wide. DRB RECOMMENDATION: Approve 81 Washington Street sign with a black metal background and gold letter with clear sides to create the "halo" effect and scale down the number 81 from a 12"to a 9" letter. Retail Storefronts—79-87 Washington Street— Sian Application Mr. Robitaille appeared before the Board with more details for the storefront signs along Washington Street. He reviewed the sign package being proposed and then showed the Board a black bracket that will be used for all the right angle signs. He also showed the placement of the right angle signs on the columns next to the storefronts, this position has been chosen so as not to ruin any of the decorative molding elements on the building. Each right angle sign will hang 71/2" - 8' from grade. DRB RECOMMENDATION: Approve bracket design, location of bracket to be centered on the columns with the sign being hung 8' from grade as mandated in the SRA sign manual and no larger than 8 square feet. The DRB also recommended that the typeface for the fagade signs be scaled down to reveal more • One Salem Green • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 background space. (A final sign plan with the correct •° business names will be submitted for final approval) 6-26 Front Street—Paint Colors Mr. Bill Goldberg, building owner, appeared before the Board with an application to paint all the wood work on the building with `California Paints Sandy Bluff color. DRB RECOMMENDATION: Approve as presented. Asahi—83 Lafayette Street—Facade Renovation David Jaquith, architect,presented elevation plans for the Asahi restaurant renovation to the former Early Radio Building at 83 Lafayette Street. The plan calls for stone veneer, wood panels and glass block. The upper brown aluminum band will remain. DRB RECOMMENDATION: No action taken. The DRB did express their concern with the brown aluminum band not being removed and the general flatness/lack of dimension of the fagade. Dracula's Castle—90 Lafayette Street— Sign Application& Facade Alterations Attorney Joe Correnti and Marshall Tripoli appeared before the DRB with a revised sign application. They informed the Board that the linear frontage of their building is 59 feet. They also informed the Board that the upper existing right angle frame will be removed and showed a revised drawing for the lower frame (5'x7') , which they requested frame be allowed to moved up one foot. The new sign the words "Dracula's Castle will be raised and the remaining text and design will be air brushed. The proposed two fagade signs were also reduced in size from 2' x 15' to 18"x 8'. These signs have a black background with raised gold letters. Gooseneck lighting is also proposed. DRB RECOMMENDATION: Approve revised sign application with the condition that the lighting effect on Dracula's Castle be removed to make the sign crisper, and the word `Castle' be moved up. No action was taken on the front and rear fagade alterations. A site visit will be scheduled. The Coffee Merchant— 196 Essex Street—Caf6 Permit Mr. Dan Elwell, owner of the Coffee Merchant, appeared before the Board with a scaled drawing of is cafe plan, as requested by the DRB and a specification sheet for his proposed hot dog cart. DRB RECOMMENDATION: Approve as presented. • 2 • Lobster Shanty—Salem Marketplace—Cafe Permit Mr. William Kelly appeared before the Board with a sample of a new planter box to cordon off his outside eating area. The planter will be painted green to match the roof color and casters were affixed to the bottom. A rope will be threaded eyehooks attached to the vertical poles in the planter. There will be eleven planters. DRB RECOMMENDATION: Approve planter as presented and required a sample of the proposed rope be provided to the DRB for final approval. Higginson Block— 10 Derby Square—Sign Application and Paint Colors Ms. Carol Whalen appeared before the Board with several applications for the Higginson Block Building. She informed the Board that a test paint color of bronze plum has been applied to the doorway on the south side of the building for the Board's review. She submitted a color photograph of the test area. Secondly, she presented an application to erect a 3' x 5' Salem Evening News logo, white nylon flag to be hung at a 45 degree angle on a 2" aluminum pole, location as shown on the submitted photograph. Thirdly, she presented an application for lettering on the 10 Derby Square window and door area, as shown in the submitted drawings and photographs. Fourthly, she showed the Board a photograph of the building in the Higginson Block alley where the Salem Evening News would like to replicate their sign that is on the Derby Square side of the building. The sign is 14" x 13' and will be centered over the storefront as 4d� depicted. Lastly,the Salem Evening News is requesting that lettering be placed on the closed s' glass door by the handicap entrance to instruct patrons that the handicap entrance is ahead. i�h� DRB RECOMMENDATION: Approve submission as presented with the condition that the flag be hung from a black pole and it be lowered so as not to obscure the fagade sign. Hair Designs by Laura—237 Washington Street— Sign Application Sue Manganiello from Sue's Signs appeared before the Board with an application to replace the 2' x 12' banner with a 3' x 10' aluminum sign over the storefront at 237 Washington Street. The sign will be painted and have a green marbleized background with silver letters and a turquoise letter outline and black shadows. DRB RECOMMENDATIONS: Approve sign with condition that the telephone number be made smaller,the letters be scaled down to reveal more background, the silver letter be done in white and the sign be centered between the top of the canopy and the top of the building edge. A revised drawing must be submitted for final approval. • 3 • Psychic Readings by Leeza— 178 Essex Street— Sign Application Mr. Donald Mitchell, business owner, appeared before the Board with an application to approve signs that have already been installed. The fagade sign consist of individual formed letters attached to the green awning valance. The letters are 12"high and 5' long. There are also two triangular signs attached to the brick columns, as shown in the photograph. These signs are 3' x 2' and have a black background with black letters. DRB RECOMMENDATION: No action was taken. A site visit to the property will be scheduled. • • 4 Salem • MM Redevelopment Authority DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA THURSDAY, JUNE 7, 2001 5:00 P.M. Roll Call: Paul Durand Donald Giard • Chris Greene David Jaquith Fred Johnson Meredith Reed Agenda: 1. Hess Gas Station—295 Derby Street— Sign Application 2. Heritage Bank—Washington Street - Sign Application 3. Polonus—East India Mall—Sign Application 4. DeLeo's—Norman Street—Request for Change to Planting Plan 5. The Coffee Merchant— 196 Essex Street—Request for Change to Cafe Permit 6. Dracula's Castle—90 Lafayette Street—Sign Application 7. Salem Physical Therapy—247 Essex Street— Sign Application 8. Higginson Block— 10 Derby Square—Sign Application 9. Kalifornia Cafe—Salem Marketplace—Satellite Dish 10. Lobster Shanty— Salem Marketplace—Outdoor Cafe 11. Dunkin Donuts—Riley Plaza- Fagade Renovation 12. Transylvania Pizza—90 Washington Street—Sign Application 13. Cilantro—282 Derby Street—Fagade & Sign Application • One Salem Green • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 One Salem Green,Salem,MA 01970 978-745-9595,ext.311 • 978-740-0404,fax RedevelopmentSalem Authority Fax To: Fred Johnson—741-9012 From: Ellen Dubinsky Chris Greene—617-536-0626 Paul Durand—741-0240 Don Giard—740-0404 Meredith Reed—744-1588 David Jaquith—927-0068 • Fax: Pages: 1 plus cover sheet Phone: Date: June 4, 2001 Re: DRB Meeting CC: ❑ Urgent x For Review ❑ Please Comment x Please Reply ❑Please Recycle Reminder ----- DRB MeetingThursday, June 7 2001 at 5:00 m. at the Y p new City Hall Annex at 120 Washington Street in the third floor conference room. We have a very full agenda (see attached). Please make every effort to attend. Thank you. • • DRB MINUTES A meeting of the Design Review Board was held on Thursday, June 7, 2001 in the third floor conference room at 120 Washington Street at 5:00 p.m. Those in attendance were Don Giard, Meredith Reed and Chris Greene. DeLeo's—28 Norman Street—Amendment to Approval for Trees & Site Work Attorney James Murray, Matt Leahy, landscaper, and Pat DeLeo, property owner, appeared before the DRB with an amendment to their landscaping approval of April 2000. Specifically, the DRB recommended and SRA approved the replacement of three Honey Locust trees, to. match the caliper of the existing tree and replacement for the two trees cut down by the owners and yew plantings with the granite curb and planting bed configurations be drawn, as outlined at the DRB meeting. Attorney Murray stated that at this time the owner would like to replace all the trees with three, Bradford Pear trees of 4" caliper and plant privet hedges with no curbing and keep the remaining dimensions of the existing plant bed. He continued that owners have received estimates for the curbing in the amount of$10,000 and the 12"-14" caliper Bradford Pear trees are not only difficult to locate but expensive. Mr. Leahy expressed his concern for the survivability of such trees, because of the sidewalk conditions. He also stated that a 2 '/2 " —3" tree will grow much quicker and have a better survivability rate, stating that a 12"-14" caliper tree has an eight foot • root ball. Chris Greene stated that this is a remediation situation where existing mature trees were cut down by the property owner and to replace it with what was existing is appropriate restitution, continuing that the City should not lose the impact of the mature trees on its streetscape. He stated it would be different if this was a new development with new trees, but this is remediation situation. He continued that he is open to suggestions to make the situation better, such as if transplanting big trees is problematic maybe more smaller trees could be planted so the City gets some of the value back. Attorney Murray stated that his client would like to propose taking down all the trees and replacing them with all new 4" caliper trees. Chris Greene responded that on of those trees is a thriving mature Bradford Pear and asked why they would like to remove a healthy tree. Mr. Leahy responded that this would allow all the trees to grow at the same rate. Mr. Greene stated that he would considered the replacement of all the trees with three 4"-5" caliper trees, a privet hedge and some way to block the cars to they do not damage or kill the hedges and trees, such as curbing away from the edge of the plant bed or the use of bollards. Mr. Leahy responded that curbing is not going to prohibit a car from hurting the bushes or trees and he commented that bollards are not attractive. He suggested that a document be signed by the DeLeo's stating that if a tree/landscaping is damaged that it will be replaced. 1 • Mr. Greene responded that he would recommend that there be three, 4" caliper Bradford Pear trees planted along with a full privet hedge and 6 ornamental bollards 8' on center. Mr. Giard added that if the parking configuration is not going to change at this time,the landscaping bed can be expanded which will be better for the trees. Mr. Greene agreed and stated that the plant bed be expanded by four feet and the trees be planted in the middle of the bed. The Board suggested that the applicant caucus and review the DRB remediation proposal and their decision can be discussed latter on in the agenda. Let the record show David Jaquith arrived at the meeting at this time. Heritage Bank—71 Washington Street Offices & Retail Storefronts 81-87 Washington Street—Sign Application Mr. Bud Robitaille from Metro Sign and Ms. Doris Murphy of Heritage Bank appeared before the Board with an application to was to present an uniformed sign system of the retail stores along Washington Street (Heritage Bank owned property). The plan calls for four, uniform 14" x 8' signs to be placed on the sign band. All fagade signs will have a black background with gold lettering. In addition, each store would have a right angle sign with the same bracket, shape and size (30" x 36"). Each of these signs will have different color combinations. \, The Board expressed their pleasure with the uniformed sign proposal and the placement of the fagade and right angle signs. Mr. Greene commented that right angle sign do not have to have the same shape, but the bracket design and location should be standardized. Mr. Giard agreed stating that he liked the shape of the Touch of the Past sign and felt the businesses should be encouraged to be creative in designing their right angle signs. The Board endorsed the plan and asked Mr. Robitaille to return with more specific details. Mr. Bud Robitaille then presented application to replace the panels on the right angle, clock sign on Washington Street. Mr. Robitaille stated that the bank is changing their name from Heritage Cooperative Bank to Heritage Bank. The panels will have a bronze paint finish with translucent white vinyl. The sign will be lit with existing internal fluorescent lamps. The sign dimensions are 3'8" x 3'8". The bronze plaque on the building will remain unchanged. The second sign being requested is a 16"x 11'2" sign with a black background and gold lettering to be placed above the middle window on the Church Street fagade, as shown in the plans submitted. Mr. Greene made a motion to approve the Heritage Bank signs as submitted. Mr. Jaquith seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Lastly, Mr. Robitaille presented an awning design for the entrance to 81 Washington Street. The • awning would only protrude 5". It will be made of wine Sunbrella cloth with white painted 2 • letters. Mr. Robitaille stated that this awning is being proposed because this entranceway to the upper floor is difficult to locate. Mr. Greene commented that this would be a very contemporary looking feature on a building that has just restored many historic features on the building. Mr. Greene suggested that a sign hung down into the glass on the side of the entrance could be explored. Mr. Giard suggested a right angle sign could be explored. Mr. Robitaille explained an idea for an oval shaped illuminated box that would have the number 81 wroughted out. He stated he has constructed a sign similar tot his in the past. The Board asked Mr. Robitaille to prepare detailed specifications for this type of sign and the Board will review them at their next meeting. Hess Gas Station—295 Derby Street—Sign Application Mr. Giard informed the Board that on May 3, 2001, the DRB visited the site. The members present asked that the kiosk area be cleaned-up and painted, and the poster frames be removed. They requested the dimensions for the Coastal sign in the next lot and the new Hess free standing sign at the North Street location. At this time, Mr. Bud Robitaille from Metro Sign reviewed his application with the Board to replace existing Gibbs signs with Hess signs. This application called for the installation of Hess letters on the right and left elevations of the canopy. The letters are 2'4" high and 7'10" long (illuminated)with a 6" non-illuminated green vinyl stripe around the whole canopy. The second sign will be placed on the cashier's kiosk. There will be a new aluminum green fascia with white, illuminated Hess letters and a white stripe. Ms. Dubinsky reported to the Board that the Coastal Gas Station free standing sign is 18' high and approximately 50 square feet, and the North Street Hess sign is 17' high and 32 square feet. Mr. Robitaille stated that Hess is willing to replace the existing 8' x 8' freestanding Gibbs sign with a new Coastal sign that matches the dimensions and layout of the North Street Hess free standing sign. Ms. Reed made a motion to approve the sign application as presented which includes the canopy letters as submitted; the kiosk letters as submitted; and with the conditions that the free standing replicate the size and height of the free standing sign at the North Street location; All approvals conditioned upon the kiosk and planting area being cleaned-up and painted; All point of purchase signs, poster frames, and A-frame signs be removed from the site and not be allowed on the site at any time, without making proper application for such advertising. Mr. Greene seconded the motion. Mr. Jaquith concurred and Mr. Giard was opposed. Motion so carried. Polonus— 176 Essex Street (Museum Place Mall)—Sign Application& Cafe Permit Ms. Debra Greel, Downtown Main Streets Program Manager, appeared before the DRB with an application to approve the erection of a fagade sign, which was placed along the metal awning 3 valance, as shown in the submitted photograph. The sign has a black background with 1' high, gold, plastic letters. The length of the sign is 10 feet. The second portion of the application calls for the approval of a caf6 permit. There will be four, square tables with two chairs at each table. (This is the same furniture that was previously approved for the former tenant—Bailey's Ice Cream.) The tables will be placed on the sidewalk in front of the storefront windows. Ms. Reed made a motion to approve sign and cafe permit as submitted conditioned upon the removal of the A-frame sign and that the applicant submit a window signage plan to reduce the visual clutter that currently exists. Mr. Greene seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. The Coffee Merchant— 196 Essex Street—Cafe Permit Mr. Dan Elwell, owner of the Coffee Merchant appeared before the Board for a Cafd Permit (photographs of the furniture and placement were submitted) and to request the addition of a hot dog cart. The cart will be placed outside the gates to the public walkway. A specific cart design was not submitted at this time. The DRB requested that a scaled drawing of the cafe area and the specific design of the cart be submitted. Dracula's Castle—90 Lafayette Street— Sign Application& Facade Alterations Attorney Joseph Correnti, Marshall Tripoli and James Duratti appeared before the Board with an application to insert two faces into the existing two right angle frames (35 s.f. & 32 s.£) on the building and to erect two, 2' x 15' fagade signs. The application also called for approval for the front and rear fagade designs. Attorney Correnti explained that this building was vacant for a number of years and three years ago, Mr. Tripoli and Mr. Duratti moved their haunted house from the Market Place to this building. They have completed many lease-hold improvements and their goal is to eventually purchase this building. Mr. Giard asked what the linear frontage of the building was. Mr. Tripoli replied approximately 50 feet. Discussion ensued regarding the square footage and dimensional requirements of the signs presented. Attorney Correnti stated that these are existing sign boxes so they should be considered grandfathered. Mr. Greene stated that he believed there can only be one right angle sign per business, and when you add up the square footage of just the proposed surface signs, it exceeds the square footage requirement. Mr. Giard stated that once a change is proposed to signage it must meet the current requirements of the SRA sign manual and be reviewed as a new sign. The applicants stated that they would re-measure the linear frontage of the building and rework their sign proposal. No action was taken by the DRB. Let the record show that Chris Greene left the meeting at this time. Salem Physical Therapy & Rehab Center—247 Essex Street—Sign Application • 4 • Mr. Ed Juralewicz from United Sign appeared before the DRB with an application to erect a 3'x 4', right angle sign on the left side of the business' entrance door on Essex Street. The sign has a dark purple background with white lettering. As shown on the submitted photograph, the sign is ten feet from grade. The second request is for vinyl window lettering in the second floor window, as shown on the submitted drawing. The third request is for a 2"x 3", right angle sign on the right of the doorway at 120 Washington Street to indicate the handicap entrance to the business. Mr. Giard stated that the City is proposing to do a projecting sign in the same location on the column at 120 Washington Street. Mr. Juralewicz withdrew his submission for the handicap sign. Mr. Giard then asked why a more detailed bracket is not being used. Mr. Juralewicz responded that he uses this steel bracket because it is stronger and the fancy brackets are poorly made and will bend. Ms. Reed commented that there is too much going on in the signage package. There are four different type styles and five different design elements. Mr. Jaquith agreed and added that there is no hierarchy of information. Ms. Reed added that the most prominent element in the sign is the reverse colored lettering of'Habla Espanol'. She also recommended that the telephone number be removed from the sign; the same font be used on all sign with the Salem Physical Therapy being larger than the second line ' Rehab Center; and the 'Habla Espanol' not be blocked. Mr. Giard commented that the sign can even be wider than what is proposed. The Board concurred that the color choices were acceptable. Ms. Reed made a motion to approve 3'x4' sign with the condition that the same font(font used for Physical Therapy letters) be used throughout the sign; the `& Rehab Center' be made smaller; the reverse color block be removed from `Habla Espanol'; and the phone number be removed from the sign. The Board recommended that the sign be made wider. A redraw must be submitted for final approval. The window lettering was approved with the condition that the same font be used and the 2'x3' sign on Washington Street was withdrawn, as the sign maker was informed that the City sign may be put in that location. Mr. Jaquith seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. (Please Note: The sign maker resubmitted an updated drawing for the right angle sign. Members were faxed the redraw and approved the new submission.) Kalifornia Cafe— Salem Marketplace—Cafd Permit& Satellite Dish Installation Mr. Michael Levendusky, restaurant manager, appeared before the Board with an application for a cafe permit (photograph submitted) and permission to install an 18" satellite dish onto the existing antenna frame. Ms. Reed made a motion to approve cafe permit, layout as shown in submitted photograph, and approve the installation of a satellite dish on the existing roof antenna frame with the condition 5 • that the Market and Tourist Commission approve the use, location and installation of the satellite dish. The DRB recommended that the existing antenna frame be painted green to match the roof. An alternate location in the rear of the building was also approved, if the roof location was not feasible or not approved by the Market Commission. Mr. Jaquith seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. The Lobster Shanty—Salem Marketplace—Caf6 Permit Mr. William Kelly, restaurant owner, appeared before the Board with an application for a caf6 permit. Mr. Kelly explained that he has sixteen tables with four chairs each, as shown in the layout plan submitted. He stated this year he has purchased seven new green resin tables and he will replace the remaining white tables next season. The area is roped off by wood columns cemented in white, plastic "pickle pails" with flower plantings. A letter was received and entered into the record from the Market and Tourist Commission regarding their concerns with the outside seating. Specifically, they would like the applicant to find a different device other than the "pickle pails"to rope off the area; they were concerned with the storage of the furniture outside, and were concerned with the umbrellas that displayed various alcoholic beverage logos. Mr. Kelly responded to the storage issue raised by the Market Commission stating that he has no place to store,the furniture inside his restaurant, as there are 15 seats at the bar and 30 seats in the interior restaurant. He stated that he does lock the furniture at night so it cannot be stolen. Mr. Jaquith commented that the currant'pickle barrel' planters are inappropriate and it is the applicant's job to bring to the DRB a more appropriate alternative. Mr. Giard stated he did not have any issue with the green furniture or the umbrellas being proposed. The Board suggested that the furniture could be stored in one of the vacant stalls, but did not have a problem with the outside storage plan submitted. Mr. Jaquith made a motion to approve the application for a caf6 permit with the condition that an alternative container to replace the plastic pails be submitted within the next thirty days. The DRB's recommendation for approval is conditioned upon the landlord's (Market& Tourist Commission) approval. Mr. Giard seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Dunkin' Donuts—Riley Plaza—Fagade Improvements Mr. Robert Jackson, storeowner, appeared before the Board with plans for exterior improvements to the Dunkin' Donuts. The plans call for wood construction, with a combination of Benjamin Moore beige/brown paint colors, samples submitted, green fabric awnings, color& material sample submitted, and fagade signs with a black background and gold letters with black goose neck lighting. A black iron gate system will be erected at the corner of the east elevation, 6 • a catalog specification was submitted. A photograph of a similarly designed store was submitted. Mr. Giard stated he was pleased with the efforts the owner made to depart from the typical Dunkin Donuts fagade. The Board agreed. Mr. Giard asked if there are any plans for outdoor seating. Mr. Jackson responded that this is a very noisy corner and would not be conducive for outside seating. Ms. Reed made a motion to approve plans as submitted with the condition that construction drawings must be submitted for final detail review. Mr. Jaquith seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Transylvania Pizza—90 Washington Street—Sign Application Mr. Adrian Sulea, restaurant owner, appeared before the DRB with an application for a 3'x5' vinyl, window banner which will cover the rear of the pizza oven. The banner has a light beige background with red letters. The application calls for two fagade signs to be placed in the existing sign bands. The signs will be 11"x 8'2"with a red background and white letters. Mr. Giard requested a color sample and a scaled drawing of the building signs. Mr. Giard made a motion to approve the application of the banner sign as submitted and approve the two fagade signs conditional upon the submission of the red letter color samples and a scaled drawing of the fagade signs. (Please Note: The information was received, distributed, and approved by the DRB.) Cilantro—282 Derby Street—Sign & Awning Application& Fapade Alterations David Jaquith recused himself as a DRB member during this presentation. David Jaquith, architect, and Mr. & Mrs. Marin, restaurant owners appeared before the Board with an application to erect a 2'4" x 3'8"right angle sign with a black bracket on the left column of the storefront, as shown on the drawing. The sign will be wood carved and hang from rods. A metal/bronze awning, which is existing, is also being proposed with the restaurant name on the valance. A thin layer of brick is being proposed, which will match the existing building brick, on the bottom four panels of the storefront. Ms. Reed made a moptin to approve the Cilantro application as presented. Mr. Giard seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. DeLeo's—28 Norman Street—Tree Replacement Amendment David Jaquith recused himself from this discussion and vote. 7 e� • Attorney Murray addressed the Board informing them that although the DeLeo's do not want to lose any space in their parking lot, they have agreed to widen the plant bed by one foot and place a formed concrete curb in place of bollards. Ms. Reed made a motion to approve the replacement of two trees with 4"-5" caliper Bradford Pear trees; the mature tree will remain; the planting of privet hedges; and the extension of the interior plant bed into the property by one foot; and to allow a concrete curb to be substituted for granite material—scaled plans and specifications must be submitted for the curb. She further motioned that a written guarantee be executed with the property owners that if the trees or hedges become damaged, they must be replaced immediately. Mr. Giard seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. (*Please note: Mr. DeLeo informed the SRA staff the morning after the meeting that he did not want to increase the interior plant bed by 1 foot, because of truck parking problems at the site, he was concerned with the loss of driving area in the parking lot. He also expressed concern that if a curb is erected, there could be water/ice problems at the site, because of the slope of the property.) There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Ellen S. Dubinsky Secretary 8 r r Salem • Redevelopment Authority DRB RECOMMENDATIONS (from meeting held on June 7, 2001) Heritage Bank—71 Washington Street & Offices & Retail Storefronts 81-87 Washington Street— Sign Application Mr. Bud Robitaille from Metro Sign and Ms. Doris Murphy of Heritage Bank appeared before the Board with an application to replace the panels on the right angle, clock sign on Washington Street. The bank is changing their name from Heritage Cooperative Bank to Heritage Bank. The panels will have a bronze paint finish with translucent white vinyl. The sign will be lit with existing internal fluorescent lamps. The sign dimensions are 3'8" x 3'8". The bronze plaque on the building will remain unchanged. The second sign being requested is a 16"x 11'2" sign with a black background and gold lettering to be placed above the middle window on the Church Street fagade, as shown in the plans submitted. • DRB RECOMMENDATION: Approve as submitted. The second portion of Mr. Robitaille's presentation was to present an uniformed sign system of the retail stores along Washington Street(Heritage Bank owned property). The plan calls for four,uniform 14" x 8' signs to be placed on the sign band. All fagade signs will have a black background with gold lettering. In addition, each store would have a right angle sign with the same bracket, shape and size (30"x 36"). Each of these signs will have different color combinations. An awning design for the entrance to 81 Washington Street was shown to the Board. The awning would only protrude 5". It will be made of wine Sunbrella cloth with white painted letters. DRB RECOMMENDATION: Approve fagade signs as submitted and approve uniform bracket design and locations of right angle signs, but will allow creativity of the shape of each business sign. Several design alternatives were discussed for the 81 Washington Street entrance—no action was taken on this portion of the request. Hess Gas Station—295 Derby Street—Sign Application • Mr. Bud Robitaille from Metro Sign presented an application to the Board to replace existing Gibbs signs with Hess signs on April 5, 2001. This application called for the installation of Hess One Salem Green • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-04041 • letters on the right and left elevations of the canopy. The letters are 2'4"high and 7'l 0" long (illuminated) with a 6"non-illuminated green vinyl stripe around the whole canopy. The second sign will be placed on the cashier's kiosk. There will be a new aluminum green fascia with white, illuminated Hess letters and a white stripe. The third portion of this application calls for replacing the face of the free standing sign(8' x 8') with Hess letters and three plaques for gas prices. No action was taken at this meeting, and a site visit was scheduled. On May 3, 2001, the DRB visited the site. Members asked that the kiosk area be cleaned-up and painted, and the poster frames be removed. They requested the dimensions for the Coastal sign in the next lot and the new Hess free standing sign at the North Street location. At Thursday's meeting,the Board was informed that the Coastal sign is 18' high and approximately 50 square feet. The North Street Hess sign is 17' high and 32 square feet. DRB Recommendation: Approve canopy letters as submitted; approve kiosk letters and submitted; approve a free standing sign that replicates the size and height of the sign at the North Street location; All approvals conditioned upon the kiosk and planting area being cleaned-up and painted; All point of purchase signs, poster frames, and A-frame signs be removed from the site and not be allowed on the site at any time, without making proper application for such advertising. • Cilantro—282 Derby Street—Sign&Awning Application& Facade Alterations David Jaquith, architect, and Mr. & Mrs. Marin,restaurant owners appeared before the Board with an application to erect a 2'4"x 3'8" right angle sign with a black bracket on the left column of the storefront, as shown on the drawing. The sign will be wood carved and hang from rods. A metal bronze awning, which is existing, is also being proposed with the restaurant name on the valance. A thin layer of brick is being proposed, which will match the existing building brick, on the bottom four panels of the storefront. DRB RECOMMENDATION: Approve application as presented. Dunkin' Donuts—Riley Plaza—Facade Improvements Mr. Robert Jackson, storeowner, appeared before the Board with plans for exterior improvements to the Dunkin' Donuts. The plans call for wood construction, with a combination of Benjamin Moore beige/brown paint colors, samples submitted, green fabric awnings, color& material sample submitted, and fagade signs with a black background and gold letters with black goose neck lighting. A black iron gate system will be erected at the corner of the east elevation, a catalog specification was submitted. A photograph of a similarly designed store was submitted. DRB RECOMMENDATION: Approve plans as submitted. Construction drawings must • be submitted for final detail review. 2 • The Coffee Merchant— 196 Essex Street—Cafe Permit Mr. Dan Elwell, owner of the Coffee Merchant appeared before the Board for a Cafe Permit (photographs of the furniture and placement were submitted) and to request the addition of a hot dog cart. The cart will be placed outside the gates to the public walkway. A specific cart design was not submitted at this time. The DRB requested that a scaled drawing of the cafd area and the specific design of the cart be submitted. Dracula's Castle—90 Lafayette Street— Sian Application& Facade Alterations Attorney Joseph Correnti, Marshall Tripoli and James Duratti appeared before the Board with an application to insert two faces into the existing two right angle frames on the building and to erect two, 2' x 15' fagade signs. The application also called for approval for the front and rear fagade designs. Discussion ensued regarding the square footage and dimensional requirements of the signs presented. The applicants stated that they would re-measure the linear frontage of the building and rework their sign proposal. No action was taken by the DRB. Salem Physical Therapy &Rehab. Center—247 Essex Street—Sign Application • Mr. Ed Juralewicz from United Sign appeared before the DRB with an application to erect a 3'x4', right angle sign on the left side of the doorway entrance on Essex Street. The sign has a dark purple background with white lettering. The second request is for vinyl window lettering in the second floor window, as shown on the submitted drawing. The third request is for a 2"0", right angle sign on the right of the doorway at 120 Washington Street to indicate the handicap entrance to the business. DRB RECOMMENDATION: Approve 3'x4' sign with the condition that the same font (font used for Physical Therapy letters) be used throughout the sign; the `& Rehab Center' be made smaller; the reverse color block be removed from `Habla Espanol'; and the phone number be removed from the sign. The Board recommended that the sign be made wider. A redraw must be submitted for final approval. The window lettering was approved with the condition that the same font be used and the 2'x3' sign on Washington Street was withdrawn, as the sign maker was informed that the City sign may be put in that location. *The sign make resubmitted an updated drawing for the right angle sign. Members were faxed the redraw and • approved the new submission with the condition that the telephone number be condensed and the "Salem"vinyl 3 • window lettering font be changed to match the "Physical Therapy" lettering. *A new drawing was submitted to reflect the above changes and the sign was approved as drawn. Kalifornia Cafe— Salem Marketplace—Cafe Permit& Satellite Dish Installation Mr. Michael Levendusky, restaurant manager, appeared before the Board with an application for a cafe permit (photograph submitted) and permission to install an 18" satellite dish onto the existing antenna frame. DRB RECOMMENDATION: Approve cafe permit, layout as shown in submitted photograph, and approve the installation of a satellite dish on the existing roof antenna frame with the condition that the Market and Tourist Commission approve the use, location and installation of the satellite dish. The DRB recommended that the existing antenna frame be painted green to match the roof. An alternate location in the rear of the building was also approved, if the roof location was not feasible or not approved by the Market Commission. • The Lobster Shanty—Salem Marketplace—Cafe Permit Mr. William Kelly, restaurant owner, appeared before the Board with an application for a caf6 permit. Mr. Kelly explained that he has sixteen tables with four chairs each, as shown in the layout plan submitted. He stated this year he has purchased seven new green resin tables and he will replace the remaining white tables next season. The area is roped off by wood columns cemented in white, plastic "pickle pails"with flower plantings. A letter was received and entered into the record from the Market and Tourist Commission regarding their concerns with the outside seating. Specifically, they would like the applicant to find a different device other than the "pickle pails" to rope off the area; they were concerned with the storage of the furniture outside, and were concerned with the umbrellas that displayed various alcoholic beverage logos. DRB RECOMMENDATION: The Board approved the application with the condition that an alternative container to replace the plastic pails be submitted within the next thirty days. The Board approved Mr. Kelly's outdoor storage plan and approved the use of the different types of product umbrellas. The DRB's recommendation for approval is conditioned upon the landlord's (Market& Tourist Commission) approval. Polonus— 176 Essex Street (Museum Place Mall)— Sign Application& Cafd Permit • Ms. Debra Greel, Downtown Main Streets Program Manager, appeared before the DRB with an application to approve the erection of a facade sign, which was placed along the metal awning 4 • valance, as shown in the submitted photograph. The sign has a black background with 1' high, gold,plastic letters. The length of the sign is 10 feet. The second portion of the application calls for the approval of a cafe permit. There will be four, square tables with two chairs at each table. (This is the same furniture that was previously approved for the former tenant—Bailey's Ice Cream.) The tables will be placed in front of the storefront. DRB RECOMMENDATION: Approve sign and cafe permit as submitted conditioned upon the removal of the A-frame sign. The DRB suggested that the applicant submit a window signage plan to reduce the visual clutter that currently exists. Transylvania Pizza—90 Washington Street—Sign Application Mr. Adrian Sulea, restaurant owner, appeared before the DRB with an application for a 3'x5' window banner, to cover the rear of the pizza oven. The banner has a light beige background with red letters. The application calls for two fagade signs to be placed in the existing sign bands. The signs will be 11"x 8'2"with a red background and white letters. (There was also preliminary discussion of changing the storefront colors using a combination of red, gray and white.) DRB RECOMMENDATION: Approve application conditional upon the submission of red letter color samples and a scaled drawing of the fagade • signs. The banner sign was approved as submitted. DeLeo's—28 Norman Street—Tree Replacement Amendment Attorney James Murray, Matt Leahy, landscaper, and Pat DeLeo,property owner, appeared before the DRB with an amendment to their landscaping approval of April, 2000. Specifically, the DRB recommended and SRA approved the replacement of three Honey Locust trees,to match the caliper of the existing tree and replacement for the two trees cut down by the owners and yew plantings with the granite curb and planting bed configurations be drawn, as outlined at the DRB meeting. At this time the owner wants to replace all the trees with three, Bradford Pear trees of 4" caliper and plant privet hedges with no curbing and keep the remaining dimensions of the existing plant bed. DRB RECOMMENDATION: Approve the replacement of two trees with 4"-5" caliper Bradford Pear trees. Do not remove one remaining mature tree. Allow for the planting of privet hedges; extend the interior plant bed into the property by one foot; allow a concrete curb to be substituted for granite material—scaled plans and specifications must be submitted for the curb; execute a written guarantee with the property owners that if • the trees or hedges become damaged, they must be replaced immediately. 5 • *Please note: Mr. DeLeo informed the SRA staff the morning after the meeting that he did not want to increase the interior plant bed by 1 foot, because of truck parking problems at the site, he was concerned with the loss of driving area in the parking lot. He also expressed concern that if a curb is erected, there could be water/ice problems at the site, because of the slope of the property. • • 6 Salem Redevelopment Authority DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA THURSDAY, MAY 3, 2001 5:00 p.m. Roll Call: Paul Durand Donald Giard • Chris Greene David Jaquith Fred Johnson Meredith Reed Agenda: 1. The Children's Museum—209R Essex Street—Sign Application 2. Hess Gas Station—295 Derby Street— Sign Application • One Salem Green • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 • DRB MINUTES May 3,2001 A meeting of the Design Review Board was held on Thursday, May 3, 2001 in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green at 5:00 p.m. Those in attendance were Don Giard, Meredith Reed and Dave Jaquith(late). The Children's Museum—209R Essex Street— Sign Application A site visit was held at 209R Essex Street to discuss the proposed signage for this new business. Because it is located in the rear of the building, discussions ensued regarding signage that could be seen from the pedestrian mall. Ms. Mary Sholds from the Children's Museum and Ken McTague from Concept Signs explained their application for three banners and a sign for this new Museum. The banners are 34" x 15' and will be 15' from grade. The banners are black with green, red, blue and yellow lettering and logo, as shown in the submitted drawings. One banner will be located on the comer of the fagade facing Old Town Hall. The second banner will be hung on the corner of the fapade of the building facing Holyoke Court, and the third banner will be placed on the corner of the Museum fagade and Holyoke Court. The fa9ade sign is 12" x 120"with a black background and vinyl applied colored letters, as shown. The sign will mounted above the doorway and window as shown on the submitted photograph. Mr. Giard stated that he like the banners and the graphics. He suggested the banners be printed on both • sides, he also suggested that the banners be hung 10 feet from grade and not 15 feet from grade. Mr. Giard made a motion to approve the application as submitted with the condition that the banners be double sided and only be ten feet from grade. Ms. Reed seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Hess Gas Station—Derby Street—Sign Application Mr. Bud Robitaille from Metro Sign met the Board at the site. Mr. Robitaille walked the members through the sign application. In discussions regarding the proposed free standing sign, Ms. Reed suggested that the size of the sign match the Hess sign on North Street. Mr. Jaquith also suggested that the height of the proposed free standing sign be lowered, so it is no higher than the Coastal Gas Station sign. He continued that the approval should be conditioned that the planters on the property be repaired and painted and the building be painted and the Point of Purchase posters be removed from the building. The Board requested that specifications for a new free standing (that is lower than the existing and matches the size of the Hess Gas Station on North Street) sign be submitted. There being no further business,the meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submitted, • Ellen S. Dubinsky Secretary r v Salem • Redevelopment Authority DRB RECOMMENDATIONS (from meeting held on May 3, 2001) The Children's Museum—209R Essex Street— Sign Application Ms. Mary Sholds from the Children's Museum and Ken McTague from Concept Signs presented an application for three banners and a sign for this new Museum. The banners are 34" x 15' and will be 15' from grade. The banners are black with green, red, blue and yellow lettering and logo, as shown in the submitted drawings. One banner will located on the corner of the fagade • facing Old Town Hall. The second banner will be hung on the corner of the fagade of the building facing Holyoke Court and the third banner will be placed on the corner of the Museum fagade and Holyoke Court. The fagade sign is 12" x 120" with a black background and vinyl applied colored letters, as shown. The sign will mounted above the doorway and window as shown on the submitted photograph. DRB RECOMMENDATION: Approve the application as submitted with the condition that the banners be double sided and only be ten feet from grade. • One Salem Green • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 One Salem Green,Salem,MA 01970 978-745-9595,ext.311 • 978-740-0404,fax Salem Redevelopment Authority To: Robert Curran 978-745-0556 From: Joseph Walsh Michael Connelly 978-744-5865 Russ Vickers 978--7744�0-9994 Michael Brennan 15 $-222-6181 Conrat Baldini Fax: Pages: cover sheet . Phone: Date: May 2,2001 Re: DRB Meeting CC: ❑ Urgent X For Review ❑ Please Comment ❑ Please Reply ❑Please Recycle I wanted to let you know that there is a DRB Meeting on Thursday, May 3, 2001 at 5:00 pm. at which time the Board will review the Hess Gas Station application. A site visit to this property is planned, and since this issue was discussed at the last SRA meeting, I wanted to invite you to the meeting. We will meet in the Conference room at One Salem Green and proceed from there. • One Salem Green,Salem,MA 01970 978-745-9595,ext.311 978-740-0404,fax Salem • Redevelopment Authority Fax To: Fred Johnson-741-9012 From: Ellen Dubinsky Chris Greene-617-536-0626 Paul Durand-741-0240 Don Giard-740-0404 Meredith Reed-744-1588 David Jaquith-927-0068 • Fax: Pages: cover sheet Phone: Date: May 1, 2001 Re: DRB Meeting CC: ❑ Urgent X For Review ❑ Please Comment ❑ Please Reply ❑ Please Recycle Sorry for the mistake----- Reminder ----- DRB Meeting Thursday, May 3, 2001 at 5:00 pm. We have two site visits planned for this Thursday's meeting. The first is the proposed Children's Museum downtown and the second is the Hess (presently Gibb's) gas station on Derby Street. We will meet in the Conference room at One Salem Green and proceed from there. Please call me to confirm your attendance. • Thank you. Ellen One Salem Green,Salem,MA 01970 978-745-9595,ext.311 • 978-740-0404,fax Salem Redevelopment Authority Fax To: Fred Johnson—741-9012 From: Ellen Dubinsky Chris Greene—617-536-0626 Paul Durand—741-0240 Don Giard—740-0404 Meredith Reed—744-1588 David Jaquith—927-0068 • Fax: Pages: cover sheet Phone: Date: May 1, 2001 Re: DRB Meeting CC: ❑ Urgent X For Review ❑ Please Comment ❑ Please Reply ❑ Please Recycle Reminder ----- 3 DRB Meeting Thursday, Mays, 2001 at 5:00 pm. v We have two site visits planned for this Thursday's meeting. The first is the proposed Children's Museum downtown and the second is the Hess (presently Gibb's) gas station on Derby Street. We will meet in the Conference room at One Salem Green and proceed from there. Please call me to confirm your attendance. • Thank you. Ellen • DRB Meeting Notes—4/5/01 Members present: David Jaquith, Don Giard 1. Daniel Low Building—Brian McKay, owner of Daniel Low building,presented plans and historic photographs for a proposed entry along the Essex Mall. This entrance will provide handicap access and match the historic character of the building. Material samples were presented along with a rendering of the new entry. The DRB members present recommended approval for the plans as submitted for a new, on- grade entrance along Essex Mall with two (2) 3' x 7'6" external mahogany passenger doors with tempered glass. 2. Hess Gas Station—The applicant submitted plans for a face change of an existing free-standing sign and changes to the existing building signage. The DRB members reviewed the material and proposed a site visit. 3. Salem Oriental Gallery —Yong Wang presented a drawing of a proposed right angle sign to replace the existing sign at 24 Front Street. The DRB members reviewed the sign and recommended approval with a minor change in the spacing of the lettering. The applicant was asked to submit a final drawing to scale illustrating the iron frame/ support for the sign. • O e re Salem • ® Redevelopment Authority DRB RECOMMENDATIONS (April 5, 2001 Meeting) Daniel Low Building—Door Installation Brian McKay, owner of Daniel Low building, presented plans and historic photographs for a proposed entry along the Essex Mall. This entrance will provide handicap access and match the historic character of the building. The doors are 3' x 7'6" external mahogany passenger doors with tempered glass. Material samples were presented along with a rendering of the new entry. DRB RECOMMENDATION: Approve as presented. Please Note: Discussion ensued regarding color changes for the building. A sample panel of door, canopy, and window trim colors were prepared and submitted after the DRB meeting for • approval. Members have reviewed the paint samples and approve the color choices. Hess Gas Station—295 Derby Street—Sign Application Mr. Bud Robitaille from Metro Sign submitted plans for a face change of an existing free- standing sign and changes to the existing building signage at the Gibbs Gas Station. DRB RECOMMENDATION: No Action taken. The DRB members scheduled a site visit. Salem Oriental Gallery—24 Front Street—Sign Application Yong Wang presented a drawing of a proposed right angle sign to replace the existing sign at 24 Front Street. The sign is 1.5' x 3' with a black background and gold logo and lettering. DRB RECOMMENDATION: Approve as presented with a minor change in the spacing of the lettering. The applicant was asked to submit a final drawing to scale illustrating the iron frame/ support for the sign. • One Salem Green • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 r , Salem • LUM Redevelopment Authority To: DRB Members From: Ellen Dubinsky Date: March 28,2001 Re: April 5d'Meeting SRA Sign Manual Per our discussion at the last meeting, I have enclosed a copy of the existing sign manual, the updated manual, and a chart outlining the changed regulations. Unfortunately, I will not be able to attend the April 5meeting (Don Giard will staff the meeting), so you have time to review these documents. Please note any comments, suggestions, or questions you have regarding the guidelines,and we can discuss them at the May 3rd meeting or schedule a special meeting to discuss the new sign manual. Daniel Low Building—231 Essex Street—Replacement of Doorway As you may be aware,the Daniel Low Building has recently been purchased. The new owner, Bryan McKay, has filed an application to open a once existing doorway on the Essex Street fagade. This will serve as the handicap accessible entrance. Mr. McKay will present his plans and door selections to the Board at Thursday's meeting. Hess Gas Station—295 Derby Street—Sign Application The existing Gibbs Gas Station on Derby Street is being converted to a Hess Gas Station. The application calls for refacing the canopy and cashier's building with illuminated green Hess signs. The applicant has also submitted a face change for the existing freestanding sign on the property. As you know, freestanding signs are not allowed in the Urban Renewal Area. The DRB has the jurisdiction to request the removal of such a sign,however, historically, we have allowed businesses with grandfathered freestanding signs to replace them with smaller and lower signs. As submitted,this application does not represent a change in size or height of the freestanding sign. I have attached the site photographs and proposed signs for your review. • One Salem Green • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 a One Salem Green,Salem,MA 01970 978-745-9595,ext.311 • 978-740-0404,fax Salem Redevelopment Authority AW ffmwicm To: Fred Johnson—741-9012 From: Ellen Dubinsky Chris Greene—617-536-0626 Paul Durand—741-0240 Don Giard—740-0404 Meredith Reed—744-1588 David Jaquith—927-0068 • Fax: Pages: cover sheet Phone: Date: April 4,2001 Re: DRB Meeting CC: ❑ Urgent X For Review ❑Please Comment ❑ Please Reply ❑ Please Recycle Reminder ----- DRB Meeting Thursday, April 5, 2001 at 5:00 pm. Please call Don Giard if you are unable to attend. Thank you. • r Salem • L11 171 Redevelopment Authority DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA THURSDAY, MARCH 1, 2001 5:00 p.m. Roll Call: Paul Durand Donald Giard • Chris Greene David Jaquith Fred Johnson Meredith Reed Agenda: 1. Peabody Essex Museum—Banner System for Temporary Entrance 2. Salem Marketplace—Lowering of brick wall 3. Museum Place—lettering on sign directory by fountain esd\drh\agenda • One Salem Green • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 One Salem Green,Salem,MA 01970 978-745-9595,ext.311 978-740-0404,fax Salem • Redevelopment Authority Fax To: Fred Johnson—741-9012 From: Ellen Dubinsky Chris Greene—617-536-0626 Paul Durand—741-0240 Don Giard—740-0404 Meredith Reed—744-1588 David Jaquith—927-0068 • Fax: Pages: cover sheet Phone: Date: February 27, 2001 Re: DRB Meeting CC: ❑ Urgent X For Review ❑ Please Comment ❑ Please Reply ❑ Please Recycle Reminder ----- DRB Meeting Thursday, March 1, 2001 at 5:00 pm. Tentative Agenda: Peabody Essex Museum—Banner System for Temporary Entrance Salem Marketplace— Lowering of brick wall Museum Place—The Bagel Place lettering on sign directory at fountain • Please call me if you are unable to attend. Thankyou. Ellen • DRB MINUTES MARCH 1,2001 The Design Review Board met in open session on Thursday, March 1, 2001 at 5:00 p.m. in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green. Those in attendance were: Paul Durand, Don Giard, David Jaquith, Fred Johnson and Meredith Reed. Salem Marketplace—Removal of Portion of Wall Mr. Richard Bencal, staff administrator to the Market and Tourist Commission, appeared before the Board with an application to lower the wall (remove 14 brick rows) across from Stall #2. The lowered wall will be capped to match the existing design. The Commission feels that this will open up the Market area and make it more inviting. Mr. Johnson recommended leaving the entrance pier at its existing height and adding a light fixture to the top of it to give the entrance a more welcoming feeling. Mr. Giard suggested that an archway could be constructed. Ms. Reed commented that to add an archway would start to close-up the area. Other Board members concurred. Mr. Johnson made a motion to allow the wall to be reduced by 14 brick rows with the condition that the pier near the entrance remain at full height and a light fixture be placed on the top of the • pier. Ms. Reed seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Peabody Essex Museum—Banners for New Entrance Mr. Fred Johnson presented an application to erect twelve, evenly spaced banners along the front of East India Marine Hall and the Japanese Garden. The banners are 6 feet tall and 2 feet wide. The 2", round, metal post will have decorative ball on the top. It is proposed that the bottom outside comer of the banner will remain free. The bottom portion of the banners will be changed as the major Museum exhibits change. He stated that the banner system being presented today is for The Art ofAmerican Embroidery exhibit. The top of the banners in front of East India Hall will read `shop and cafe', as this is where the gift shop will be located during construction, and the banners in the garden will read `entrance'. Mr. Johnson also asked for an amendment to the color of the temporary entrance paint/stain to Benjamin Moore Sandsport Gray. Ms. Reed made a motion to approve the banners and paint color as submitted. Mr. Jaquith seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. The Bagel Shop—Museum Place Mall—Sig_n Ms. Dubinsky informed the Board that on the East India Fountain side of Museum Place, there is a sign and a tenant directory on the large brick will. The Bagel Place is requesting that they be allowed to replace the `Bruegger's Bagels' lettering with `The Bagel Place' lettering in the same color, font, and material as the existing directory names. • Ms. Reed made a motion to approve the application as presented. Mr. Jaquith seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Other Business Ms. Reed raised her concern regarding the increase of banners within the urban renewal area. Ms. Dubinsky stated that there are regulations governing temporary signs within the district. Specifically, an event sign can only be displayed for a two-week period of time. At this time, Ms. Dubinsky informed the Board that some changes to the SRA's sign manual have beenro osed, and actually approved,however the have not been rolled out'. She P P Y PPY continued that she would send the Board members a chart outlining these changes and the Board can review the manual, and re-initiate the process to enact the new manual. There being no further business,the meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Ellen S. Dubinsky Secretary • r a Salem Redevelopment Authority DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 1, 2001 5:00 p.m. Roll Call: Paul Durand Donald Giard • Chris Greene David Jaquith Fred Johnson Meredith Reed Agenda: 1. Peabody Essex Museum Temporary Entrance—Change in Material 2. Century 21 Real Estate—60 Washington Street—Awning Application 3. Your Last Chance Hobby Shop—6 Front Street—Sign Application 4. The Bagel Place—Museum Place Mall—Sign Application esd\drb\agenda • One Salem Green • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 One Salem Green,Salem,MA 01970 978-745-9595,ext.311 • 978-740-0404,fax Salem Redevelopment Authority Fax -741 �2 To: Fred Johnson— From: Ellen Dubinsky Chris Greene—617-536-0626 Paul Durand—741-0240 Don Giard—740-0404 Meredith Reed—744-1588 David Jaquith—927-0068 • Fax: Pages: cover sheet Phone: Date: January 30,2001 Re: DRB Meeting CC: ❑ Urgent X For Review ❑ Please Comment ❑ Please Reply ❑ Please Recycle Reminder ----- DRB Meeting Thursday, February 1, 2001 at 5:00 pm. Tentative Agenda: Peabody Essex Museum Temporary Entrance—Change in Material Century 21 Real Estate—60 Washington Street—Awning Application Your Last Chance Hobby Shop—6 Front Street—Sign Application • The Bagel Place—Museum Place Mall —Sign Application Please call me if you are unable to attend. Thank you. Ellen • DRB Minutes February 1, 2001' A meeting of the Design Review Board was held on Thursday, February 1, 2001 in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green at 5:00 p.m. Those in attendance were Don Giard, Fred Johnson, Meredith Reed and Dave Jaquith(late). Your Last Chance Hobby Shop—6 Front Street— Sign Application Mr. Gary Jennings appeared before the Board with an application to erect 20"x 30", right angle sign centered over the doorway to his business. The sign is will be constructed from 1/2"MDO board,painted white with blue lettering, as shown in the submitted drawing. The sign will hang from a black bracket, style as shown(Style B-Northwood Forge Catalog). The bracket will be installed with the upper portion on the brick and the lower portion on the concrete band, as drawn. Ms. Dubinksy informed the Board and the applicant that per City Sign Ordinance, the bottom of the sign must be 10 feet from grade. Mr. Johnson recommended that the distance in the chain be made shorter so the sign is tighter to the bracket to keep it from moving in the wind. He also suggested that some type of tether be • used on the side or bottom of the sign, so it remain stationary. Mr. Jennings was asked the color of the chain. He responded that he would abide by the Board's recommendation. Mr. Johnson responded that the chain should be a black metal chain and he also stated that the thickness of the mdo board be increased to 1 '/2 ", and the edge and outer side (thickness) be painted blue. Mr. Johnson made a motion to approve application as submitted with the conditions that chain be black and the distance of the chain holding the sign be reduced, so the sign is closer to the bracket, the MDO board thickness be increased to 1 '/2", and its edge be painted blue. It was also recommended that the side or bottom of the sign be tethered to remain stationary. Ms. Reed seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. The Bagel Place—Museum Place Mall—Sign Application Mr. Gary Nadeau appeared before the Board with an application to erect signage onto the valance of the green awning structures over his storefront at Museum Place Mall. A 16' black aluminum panel will be placed over the former Bruegger's Bagels sign and yellow letters will be mounted on the panel. He also requested approval for blue and yellow vinyl lettering for his door, as shown with a 12-inch bagel logo. Mr. Nadeau also requested that the lettering on the • bottom of the windows be allowed to remain. Ms. Reed asked if the back panel could be changed to green to match the awning color. • Mr. Nadeau responded that the black was chosen so the sign would stand out more, since it is not illuminated, and the black background matches the style of the signs on the bottom of the windows. Mr. Jaquith commented that the letters appear very tall and asked if they could be scaled down. Mr. Johnson pointed that according to the catalog,these letters are 15" and the next size would be 12" letters. Mr. Reed commented that 12"would be too small. Mr. Nadeau responded that he would like to retain the 15" height, since the letters are not illuminated and a smaller size might be difficult to read from a distance. The Board concurred. Ms. Reed made a motion to approve application as submitted. Mr. Jaquith seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Peabody Essex Museum Temporary Entrance—Change in Material Fred Johnson recused himself from discussion and vote for this agenda item. Mr. Will Phippen from the Peabody Essex Museum presented an application to amend the materials previously approved for the temporary entrance through the Japanese Garden. He informed the Board that the price for pre-fabricated steel structures came in over budget for this project, and he requested that steel material be replaced with wood. The design would remain the same. He presented color samples, Behr Premium Plus—Cologne PEC-46 (stain), to be used • on the structure and an asphalt roofing material—GAF Marquis Weathermax. Mr. Giard made a motion to approve application as submitted. Ms. Reed second the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Century 21 Real Estate—60 Washinnton Street—Awnine Application Ms. Dubinsky informed the Board that she sent a violation to Century 21, as per the DRB request at the last meeting. She continued that she spoke with Mr. Jim D'Amico from Century 21 and he was supposed to be present at this meeting. Ms. Dubinsky informed the Board that the Building Inspector can impose fines if a violation persists and also a municipal lien could be placed on the building. The Board recommended at an other letter be sent explaining that the applicant must appear before the Board or this matter will be referred to the Building Inspector and fines could result and they should be informed that there is the possibility of a municipal lien placed on the property. The letter should be cc'd to the property owner. Peabody Block—Window Replacement Mr. Frank DiPaolo, Assistant Building Inspector, appeared before the Board to seek approval for replacing the upper arch section of the 13 large windows on the fourth floor. He explained that • those windows do not meet the energy code and they must be replaced. He continued that of thirteen 13 windows, only 3 retain the original muntin configuration. • Mr. Johnson made a motion to approve the replacement of the upper story arched window with a clear half circle, vinyl window and the rotted wood around the entire window(arch window and 2/2 window below the arch) be repaired, restored, sealed and the trim painted white. Mr. Jaquith seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Ms. Dubinsky informed the Board that the architect is working on a design for the City entrance, and as soon as it is finalized, she would contact the members. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Ellen S. Dubinsky Secretary (****Please note: On Wednesday, February 7, design plans for the City of Salem entry at the Peabody Block were submitted. The plans were shown to Fred Johnson, Paul Durand, Meredith Reed, David Jaquith and Don Giard. Below is the recommendation of the Board: City of Salem Entrance - Peabody Block— 120 Washington Street • A plan was submitted by Ray Guertin, project architect, for the City of Salem Offices entry at 120 Washington Street. The plan was shown to five DRB members individually for their review and comments. The plan calls for a double door entry with wooden pilasters and glass sidelights with wainscoting panels below and on the side of the entrance space and over the top of the doorway and windows. The center panel will hold the City seal and a hanging light fixture is proposed. There will also be a balustrade on the upper portion of the in-fill building which will match the balustrade on the Barton Square faeade and black iron grating in front of the two windows located on the in-fill fagade. (The wainscoting design will continue on the lower portion of the interior lobby and the existing brick interior will be sheetrocked. [interior elements do not require approval]). DRB RECOMMENDATION: Approve as presented with the condition that the hanging light fixture be removed and alternative surface, stationary lighting be used. • Salem Redevelopment [I] LMIU Authority DRB RECOMMENDATIONS (February 1, 2001 meeting) Peabody Essex Museum Temporary Entrance—Change in Material Mr. Will Phippen from the Peabody Essex Museum presented an application to amend the materials previously approved. He informed the Board that the price for pre-fabricated steel structures came in over budget for this project, and he requested that steel material be replaced with wood. The design would remain the same. He presented color samples, Behr Premium Plus—Cologne PEC-46 (stain), to be used on the structure and an asphalt roofing material— GAF Marquis Weathermax. DRB RECOMMENDATION: Approve application as submitted. • Your Last Chance Hobby Shop—6 Front Street— Sign Application Mr. Gary Jennings appeared before the Board with an application to erect 20" x 30", right angle sign centered over the doorway. The sign is will be constructed from %2" MDO board,painted white with blue lettering, as shown in the submitted drawing. The sign will hang from a black bracket (Style B-Northwood Forge Catalog). The bracket will be installed with the upper portion on the brick and the lower portion on the concrete band. DRB RECOMMENDATION: Approve application as submitted with the conditions that chain be black and the distance of the chain holding the sign be reduced, so the sign is closer to the bracket, and the MDO board thickness be increased to 1 '/2", and its edge be painted blue. Per City Sign Ordinance, the bottom of the sign must be 10 feet from grade. It was suggested that a tether be used on the side or bottom of the sign, so it remain stationary. The Bagel Place—Museum Place Mall— Sign Application Mr. Gary Nadeau appeared before the Board to erect signage onto the valance of the green awning structures. A 16' black aluminum panel will be placed over the former Bruegger's One Salem Green • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 • Bagels sign and yellow letters will be mounted on the panel. He also requested approval for blue and yellow vinyl lettering for his door, as shown with a 12-inch bagel logo. Mr. Nadeau also requested that the lettering on the bottom of the windows be allowed to remain. DRB RECOMMENDATION: Approve application as submitted. Peabody Block—Window Replacement Mr. Frank DiPaolo, Assistant Building Inspector, appeared before the Board to seek approval for replacing the upper arch section of the 13 large windows on the fourth floor. He explained that those windows do not meet the energy code and they must be replaced. He continued that of thirteen 13 windows, only 3 retain the original muntin configuration. DRB RECOMMENDATION: Approve the replacement of the upper story arched window with a clear half circle, vinyl window and the rotted wood around the entire window (arch window and 2/2 window below the arch) be repaired, restored, sealed and the trim painted white. • • v Salem Redevelopment Authority DRB RECOMMENDATION (Wednesday, February 7, 2001) City of Salem Entrance - Peabody Block— 120 Washington Street A plan was submitted by Ray Guertin, project architect, for the City of Salem Offices entry at 120 Washington Street. The plan was shown to five DRB members individually for their review and comments. The plan calls for a double door entry with wooden pillasters and glass sidelights with wainscoting panels below and on the side of the entrance space and over the top of the doorway and windows. The center panel will hold the City seal and a hanging light fixture is • proposed. There will also be a ballustrade on the upper portion of the in-fill building which will match the ballastrude on the Barton Square fagade and black iron grating in front of the two windows located on the in-fill fagade. (The wainscoting design will continue on the lower portion of the interior lobby and the existing brick interior will be shectrocked. [interior elements do not require approval]) DRB RECOMMENDATION: Approve as presented with the condition that the hanging light fixture be removed and alternative surface, stationary lighting be used. • One Salem Green • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 Salem • ® Redevelopment ® Authority January 22, 2001 2nd NOTICE OF VIOLATION Century 21 Real Estate 60 Washington Street Salem,MA 01970 Re: Sign/Awning Violation Dear Business Owner: This letter is to inform you that you have erected a sign/awning without receiving the necessary approvals and permits from the Salem Redevelopment Authority (SRA) and the City of Salem. You were notified of this violation on May 18, 2000 and did not properly rectify this • situation. Your business is located within the boundaries of the Heritage Plaza East Urban Renewal Area. This designation mandates that any exterior alterations to your property including signage be reviewed by the Authority's Design Review Board and approved by the SRA prior to any construction. I have enclosed the appropriate applications necessary for obtaining your permits. You are hereby requested to return such application and accompanying material to this office as soon as possible so that your application can be presented at the next Design Review Board meeting. If you can complete and submit this information by January 29, 2001, you can be placed on the February 1, 2001 meeting of the Design Review Board at One Salem Green at 5:00 p.m. to discuss this violation issue. If you have any questions regarding this issue, please do not hesitate to contact my Executive Assistant Ellen Dubinsky at 978-745-9595, ext. 311. Sincerely, 1 Patrick Reffett Executive Director • One Salem Green • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 Salem • ® Redevelopment Authority January 22, 2001 Bangkok Paradise 90 Washington Street Salem, MA 01970 Re: Sign Violation Dear Business Owner: As you may recall, in June of 2000, the awning located on your storefront were approved by the Design Review Board (DRB)with the condition that the yellow awning be lowered to match the height of the blue awning. To date,this condition has not been met. • At a DRB meeting held this month,the Board requested that this notice be sent informing you that this situation must be rectified immediately or monetary fines could result from this violation. If you have any questions regarding this issue, please contact my Executive Assistant, Ellen Dubinsky; at(978) 745-9595, ext. 311. Sincerely, Patrick Reffett I Executive Director • One Salem Green • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 Salem ® Redevelopment Authority January 19, 2001 O'Neil's Irish Pub Mr. Ronald Brogan 12Q,Washington Street Salem,MA 01970 Dear Mr. Brogan: I would like to respectfully bring to your attention the Salem Redevelopment Authority (SRA) requirement that storefront signage receive approval prior to signage placement(City of Salem Sign Ordinance, 1973, Sec. 3-23 & 3-51). Unfortunately the required process was not followed prior to your erecting the signage presently at O'Neil's. This matter was discussed at a meeting of the Design Review Board(DRB)held on January 4, 2001. As a result of discussion at this meeting,the Board was not in favor of allowing the `O'Neil's' • sign, which has been painted onto the beige upper storefront area. This sign must be removed as soon as possible. As for the two other signs in your window advertising food and entertainment,you may make application(see enclosed)to the DRB as soon as possible to be placed on the next meeting agenda. At a previous meeting,the DRB made a formal request that the project architect,Mr. Ray 'ons on Washington Street to e storefront elevations gt venin scheme for the U Guertin, prepare a unified signage/awning g protect the architectural and historical integrity of the buildings. The DRB strongly suggests that you confer with Mr. Guertin regarding signage for your business. If you have any questions regarding these issues,please do not hesitate to contact my Executive Assistant Ellen Dubinsky at(978) 745-9595, ext. 311. We are available to assist you however possible in rectifying this oversight. Thank you for your anticipated cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, 1?ck Executive Director • cc: Haim Weizman Ray Guertin Ken Rothwell Peter Strout One Salem Green • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 o , Salem Redevelopment Authority f \ DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA THURSDAY, JANUARY 4, 2001 5:00 p.m. Roll Call: Paul Durand Donald Giard Chris Greene • David Jaquith Fred Johnson Meredith Reed Agenda: 1. Wesley Church—North Street— Sign Application—Continued from 12/28/00 Meeting esd\drb\agenda • One Salem Green • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MINUTES THURSDAY, JANUARY 4, 2001 A meeting of the Design Review Board was held on Thursday, January 4, 2001 in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green at 5:00 p.m. Those in attendance were Don Giard and Paul Durand. Wesley Church—Lynde Street—Directory Sign As a result of recommendations made by the DRB at the December 28, 2000 meeting, Mr. Ed Juralewicz from United Sign appeared before the Board with new drawings of the directory sign at the entrance of the Church's Lynde Street parking lot. This sign will replace several different Church signs on the front of the building. The sign will be designed to match the maroon sign on the corner of Lynde &North Streets. It is approximately 30"x 70". Option A was presented which showed the arch shape on the top portion of the sign and a straight edge on the bottom, with the Wesley Church header panel and five program panels which are centered and no telephone numbers. The panels are 4 '/2 " with a 3 yz " capital letter size. Option B was similar, but did not have the Wesley Church header. Option C had the header panel and had the programs left justified and phone numbers right justified. Mr. Giard recommended approval of Option A with the condition that the five panel section be • dropped down two inches increasing the total height of the sign and creating a larger border area for the Wesley Church header and all building signage for these programs be removed from the Church's front fagade. Mr. Durand concurred with Mr. Giard's recommendation. Other Business At this time Mr. Giard requested that a violation letter be sent to O'Neill's Pub for the black painted lettering on the beige painted panel on the building fagade and inform him that this needs to be removed, as it will not be approved. Ms. Dubinsky responded that other Board members concurred with this item, and she will send a violation to the restaurant as soon as possible. Mr. Giard also asked the status of the Century 21 awning violation and the status of moving the awning at Bangkok Paradise, per DRB recommendation. Ms. Dubinsky stated that she would follow-up these outstanding violations. There being no further business,the meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Ellen S. Dubinsky Secretary • ASalem Redevelopment Authority DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA THURSDAY, DECEMBER 28, 2000 5:00 p.m. Roll Call: Paul Durand Donald Giard • Chris Greene David Jaquith Fred Johnson Meredith Reed Agenda: 1. AT&T Wireless Communications—Hawthorne Hotel—Wireless Antenna 2. Wesley Church—North Street—Sign Application 3. Kennsington Stobart Gallery—Hawthorne Hotel— Sign Application esd\drb\agenda One Salem Green • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 r o Salem • Redevelopment Authority TO: DRB MEMBERS FROM: ELLEN DUBINSKY, SECRETARY RE: MEETING NOTICE DATE: DECEMBER 19, 2000 Please be advised that there will be a Design Review Board meeting on Thursday, December 28, 2000, at 5:00 p.m. in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green. The Board will be reviewing plans for a PCS wireless telecommunications service to be located • on the roof of the Hawthorne Hotel. I have enclosed a copy of the application for your review. I have also received a sign application for the Wesley Church to erect an additional sign to match the existing carved gold leaf signs on the corner of Lynde and North Streets. Please contact me at 978-745-9595, ext. 311 to confirm your attendance or to let me know whether you are unable to attend this meeting. Thank you. • One Salem Green • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 DRB MINUTES December 28, 2000 The Design Review Board met in open session on Thursday, December 28, 2000 at 5:00 p.m. in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green. Those in attendance were: Paul Durand, Don Giard, and David Jaquith. AT&T Wireless Communications—Wireless Antenna at Hawthorne Hotel Attorney Peter Cura and Acquisition Consultant Ed Smith appeared before the DRB with an application to erect a wireless communications facility on the roof of the Hawthorne Hotel. Ms. Dubinsky informed the Board that Historical Commission and Planning Board approvals are also needed for this project. Attorney Cura explained that the submitted application called for the fabrication of a chimney on the front fapade portion of the roof. The chimney would be fabricated from radio frequency permeable material and contain two antennas. A third antenna would be mounted on the penthouse building, as shown on the plan. • AttorneyCura informed the DRB that as a result of the Historical Commission review, the plans have been altered and the fabrication of a flagpole is now being proposed. He explained that an original photograph of the hotel showed a flagpole on the building, so the Historic Commission asked AT&T to explore the possibility of a flagpole alternative. New photographic simulations of the placement of a flagpole were distributed to the Board. The flagpole would replace the three antenna units being proposed. Mr. Durand agreed that the flagpole option is much less obtrusive than the chimney. He did request more detailed final drawings to ensure that the fabricated pole really resembles a flagpole. Mr. Jaquith agreed that the flagpole is a good solution. Mr. Durand made a motion to approve the fabricated flagpole option as presented and finalized detailed drawings be submitted. Wesley Church—Lynde Street—Directory Sign Mr. Ed Juralewicz from United Sign appeared before the Board with an application to erect a directory sign at the entrance of the Church's Lynde Street parking lot. This sign will replace several different Church signs on the front of the building. The sign will be designed to match • the maroon sign and posts on the corner of Lynde &North Streets. The freestanding sign is 30" x 70" and will have maroon background and tan/ivory vinyl lettering. • Mr. Giard recommended that the telephone numbers be removed from the sign, as they make the sign too confusing. Mr. Jaquith stated that the post details should match the existing sign. Mr. Giard added that the gold trim detail should also match the existing sign. Mr. Durand suggested that 1"be added to each plaque. Mr. Giard and Mr. Jaquith suggested that the sign say Wesley Church. Mr. Juralewicz thanked the Board for their comments and stated he would incorporate them into a new submittal for review. Kennsington Stobart Gallery—Hawthorne Hotel—Sign Application Ms. Sandra Heaphy appeared before the Board with an application to erect two signs for an art gallery located in the Hawthorne Hotel. The first sign will be placed over an existing black plaque on the corner of Hawthorne Boulevard and Essex Street, as shown in the submitted photograph. The sign is 35"high and 24" wide (the existing plaque is 16"high and 24"wide). The sign will have a black marble design background and gold letters. The second sign is 14" high and 54" long and will be placed in the second window from the corner of Hawthorne Boulevard and Essex Street. Mr. Durand made a motion to approve the application as presented. Mr. Jaquith seconded the • motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Respectfully submitted, Ellen S. Dubinsky Secretary • r o Salem Redevelopment Authority DRB RECOMMENDATIONS meeting held on 1112100 AT&T— 133 Washington Street— Sign Application A sign application was presented to replace existing Media One signs with AT&T signs at 133 Washington Street. The building sign will be 1' x 1'10". The wall sign is aluminum with vinyl letters. The sign background is black with white lettering and a white logo. The second sign will consist of vinyl applied white letters to the window. This sign will be 1' ''/z" by 3' x 8 '/4". DRB RECOMMENDATION: Approve as presented Peabody Essex Museum—Temporary Entrance An application for a temporary walkway was presented by Dan Pierce, project architect, and Mr. • Will Phippen and Mr. John Grimes from the Peabody Essex. Mr. Pierce presented plans for a temporary entrance to the Museum, which will be used during the approximately two years of construction of the expansion plan. The entrance will be through the existing garden on the Essex Street Pedestrian Mall. A new gate will be installed to be located where the garden path begins. The stone walkway will remain and minor movement of existing plant material and some pruning will be done to accommodate this new covered entrance. The garden and gate will be returned to their previous state after the new glass entry is constructed. Mr. Pierce showed the Board the catalog of pre-fabricated pyramid forms that will be used to construct the covered walkway. The roof color will be patina green and the steel frame supports will be almond. The decking placed over the existing path will be skid proof. The 10' x 10' will be open with railings and the 20' x 20' queuing area will be glazed and temperature controlled. The entrance pyramid will overhang the public way like an awning. Its structural poles will be set into Museum property and not in the City right-of-way. DRB RECOMMENDATION: Approve as presented with the condition that no structural elements be constructed in the City right-of-way and that this temporary entrance be removed after the completion of the new glazed entry approved as part of the expansion plan. • One Salem Green • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 Salem 171 fin Redevelopment Authority' DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA THURSDAY,NOVEMBER 2, 2000 5:00 p.m. Roll Call: Paul Durand Donald Giard • Chris Greene David Jaquith Fred Johnson Meredith Reed Agenda: 1. AT&T - 133 Washington Street— Sign Application 2. Higginson Block Building—Derby Square—Paint Colors 3. Peabody Essex Museum—Temporary Entrance Plan es&drb\agenda One Salem Green • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 DRB MINUTES THURSDAY,NOVEMBER 2, 2000 The Design Review Board met in open session on Thursday,November 2, 2000 at 5:00 p.m. in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green. Those in attendance were: Meredith Reed, Fred Johnson and Paul Durand. AT&T— 133 Washington Street—Sign Application A sign application was presented to replace existing Media One signs with AT&T signs at 133 Washington Street. The building sign will be 1' x 1'10". The wall sign is aluminum with vinyl letters. The sign background is black with white lettering and a white logo. The second sign will consist of vinyl applied white letters to the window. This sign will be 1' ''/2"by 3' x 8 '/4". Mr. Durand made a motion to approve the application as presented. Mr. Johnson seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Hieeinson Block—Paint Colors Mr. Michael Blier addresses the Board stating that approximately two months ago he appeared before the Board with a palette of paint colors for the Higginson Block. After some • consideration, Mr. Blier stated that he felt the two different buildings should have two different color schemes. He is proposing that the east and west elevations of the second building be painted with the proposed raisin torte color. He also pointed that this building has a heavy cornice and felt it would not look good with previously approved green color. Mr. Johnson agreed that two separate color schemes would be a good idea, but he was concerned with the red color being proposed. He felt that more of a contrast should be sought and a darker color be chosen. He continued that is typical that windows on older buildings were painted to stand out. Currently the proposed red color blends too much into the building which would give it a less historic look. The Board suggested that Mr. Blier choose a darker color and mock-up a window for the Board to see. Mr. Blier thanked the Board for their input and stated that he would Ms. Dubinsky when the mock-up is completed so that members can visit the site. Peabody Essex Museum—Temporary Entrance Mr. Johnson recused himself from discussion and vote of this agenda item. An application for a temporary walkway was presented by Dan Pierce, project architect, and Mr. Will Phippen and Mr. John Grimes from the Peabody Essex. Mr. Pierce presented plans for a • temporary entrance to the Museum, which will be used during the approximately two years of construction of the expansion plan. The entrance will be through the existing garden on the • Essex Street Pedestrian Mall. A new gate will be installed to be located where the garden path begins. The stone walkway will remain and minor movement of existing plant material and some pruning will be done to accommodate this new covered entrance. The garden and gate will be returned to their previous state after the new glass entry is constructed. Mr. Pierce showed the Board the catalog of pre-fabricated pyramid forms that will be used to construct the covered walkway. The roof color will be patina green and the steel frame supports will be almond. The decking placed over the existing path will be skid proof. The 10' x 10' will be open with railings and the 20' x 20' queuing area will be glazed and temperature controlled. The entrance pyramid will overhang the public way like an awning. Its structural poles will be set into Museum property and not in the City right-of-way. Mr. Durand made a motion to approve the plans as presented with the condition that no structural elements be constructed in the City right-of-way and that this temporary entrance be removed after the completion of the new glazed entry approved as part of the expansion plan. Ms. Reed seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. (Mr. Giard was not in attendance, but previously reviewed the plans and stated he would concur with the Board's recommendation, so that a quorum vote could be passed.) There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Ellen S. Dubinsky Secretary • r e Salem • Redevelopment Authority DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA TUESDAY, OCTOBER 10, 2000 Roll Call: Paul Durand Donald Giard Chris Greene • David Jaquith Fred Johnson Meredith Reed Discussion: 1. Tabernacle Church—Elevator Building Design 2. Peabody Block—Downspouts—Barton Square Faqade 3. Peabody Essex Museum—Expansion Plan Review esd\drb\agenda • One Salem Green • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 STALEY MCDERMET ASSOCIATES •PRESERVATION&RESTORATION ARCHITECTURE _ - 175 Essex Street Salem,Massachusetts 01970-3726 (978)7454969 October 10 2000 The Design Review Board Salem Redevelopment Authority One Salem Green Salem,MA 01970 Re:Peabody Essex Museum Expansion Dear Design Review Board Members: At the October 5, 2000, Salem Planning Board public hearing on the proposed expansion of the Peabody Essex Museum,the Planning Board was notified that the museum wishes to deviate from a number of the unifying standards that Salem has maintained in its downtown,most since the early 1970's. The museum stated they wish to install a different brick paver than the City Hall Paver, Salem Blend. They wish to install different light fixtures, not only on the streets but also on the proposed public walkway between Essex and Charter Streets,and on the site of the destroyed Salem Armory Headhouse. Finally,they wish to deviate from the standard crosswalks of pavers placed flat and edged with Belgian blocks. The Planning Board took strong exception to the above proposed deviations from Salem City standards. I also take extremely strong exception to any deviation from the standards. I had requested that I be able to address the Design Review Board on these issues,but was informed that I could not;the Board would accept written comments only. • The above paver, street and pedestrian light fixture,and crosswalk standards should be maintained for design uniformity and consistency. They are unifying elements not only for the Essex Street pedestrian mall,but for the entire downtown area. To allow deviation, no matter how large the building project,is to open the door for and approve inconsistency throughout the downtown area. As members of the DRB,you must be aware of the myriad aesthetic problems downtown,from the multiplying A-frame signs to cars parking on grassed areas. To now allow deviation from long-held design standards is to accelerate aesthetic deterioration. It was argued at the Planning Board hearing that the proposed pavers would better complement the brick selected for the addition. Architects are supposed to design buildings to be compatible with their environment, not to change the environment to be compatible with the building's design. The scale,lack of detailing,and tombstone ends of the proposed addition are obviously not compatible with the Salem environment,but the proposal to change that environment(violate Salem's design standards)to better blend with an incompatible building is without doubt not the solution. I urge the Board to not allow any deviation from Salem's paver, light fixture, and crosswalk standards. In addition to the mall and the streets,the proposed walkway and Headhouse site are public spaces and should continue the same standards. Finally,the failure of the recently installed flat granite pavers that edged the crosswalk near the Post Office(since partially replaced with brick)also argue for retaining the traffic-calming Belgian blocks. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Staley McDermet SM/sb • cc: Salem Planning Board STALEY McDERMET ASSOCIATES • PRESERVATION&RESTORATION ARCHITECTURE 175 Essex Street Salem,Massachusetts 01970-3726 (978)7454969 October 10, 2000 The Design Review Board Salem Redevelopment Authority One Salem Green Salem,MA 01970 Re: Peabody Essex Museum Expansion Dear Design Review Board Members: At the October 5, 2000, Salem Planning Board public hearing on the proposed expansion of the Peabody Essex Museum,the Planning Board was notified that the museum wishes to deviate from a number of the unifying standards that Salem has maintained in its downtown, most since the early 1970's. The museum stated they wish to install a different brick paver than the City Hall Paver, Salem Blend. They wish to install different light fixtures, not only on the streets but also on the proposed public walkway between Essex and Charter Streets, and on the site of the destroyed Salem Armory Headhouse. Finally,they wish to deviate from the standard crosswalks of pavers placed flat and edged with Belgian blocks. The Planning Board took strong exception to the above proposed deviations from Salem City standards. I also take extremely strong exception to any deviation from the standards. I had requested that I be able to address the Design Review Board on these issues,but was informed that I could not; the Board would accept written comments only. • . The above paver, street and pedestrian light fixture,and crosswalk standards should be maintained for design uniformity and consistency. They are unifying elements not only for the Essex Street pedestrian mall,but for the entire downtown area. To allow deviation, no matter how large the building project, is to open the door for and approve inconsistency throughout the downtown area. As members of the DRB,you must be aware of the myriad aesthetic problems downtown,from the multiplying A-frame signs to cars parking on grassed areas. To now allow deviation from long-held design standards is to accelerate aesthetic deterioration. It was argued at the Planning Board hearing that the proposed pavers would better complement the brick selected for the addition. Architects are supposed to design buildings to be compatible with their environment, not to change the environment to be compatible with the building's design. The scale, lack of detailing,and tombstone ends of the proposed addition are obviously not compatible with the Salem environment,but the proposal to change that environment(violate Salem's design standards)to better blend with an incompatible building is without doubt not the solution. I urge the Board to not allow any deviation from Salem's paver,light fixture,and crosswalk standards. In addition to the mall and the streets,the proposed walkway and Headhouse site are public spaces and should continue the same standards. Finally, the failure of the recently installed flat granite pavers that edged the crosswalk near the Post Office(since partially replaced with brick)also argue for retaining the traffic-calming Belgian blocks. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Staley McDermet SM/sb . cc: Salem Planning Board • DRB MINUTES October 10,2000 The Design Review Board met in open session on Tuesday, October 10, 2000 at 5:00 p.m. in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green. Those in attendance were: Paul Durand, Chris Greene, Fred Johnson and Meredith Reed and David Jaquith(late). SRA Executive Director Patrick Reffett was also present. Tabernacle Church—50 Washington Street—Amendment to Elevator Tower Addition Ms. Celia Corkrey, project architect, and Mr. Doug Karam, Church member, appeared before the DRB with amendments to their addition. Ms. Corkrey explained that as responding to some of the DRB questions and suggestions of the Board, specifically regarding the reclaiming of the granite stones, new granite that matches the existing has been located. New elevations of the addition were distributed to the Board, as well as photographs of the new granite. Ms. Corkrey continued that, although the existing granite was to be reclaimed,there was always a possibility that there would not be enough. The new granite, which so closely matches the existing, will ensure that the new lower portion of the addition can be built up to the existing water table. Mr. Greene commented that the lintel should have a keystone. Mr. Karam responded that this is not proposed because we did not want to preclude the addition of a canopy to the tower at a future date. The Board agreed that the keystone does not have to protrude, but could be flush • with the building, so that the canopy can be added. Mr. Karam continued that the reclaimed stone will be used on the upper band portion of the addition. Mr. Johnson suggested that the new stones be cut to larger dimensions. He asked if the lintel portion could be salvaged. Mr. Karam responded that the intent is to salvage this portion. Mr. Greene asked about the mortar joints. Mr. Karam responded that the mortar joints of the building have been studied and the joints and the stones are a different color and shape above the water table, but it is intended that each portion of the new addition be made to match the existing conditions. Mr. Johnson made a motion to approve the amendments and new elevation drawings as presented. Mr. Durand seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Peabody Block Mr. Ray Guertin, project architect, appeared before the Board regarding drainage issues. Before the drainage discussion began, Mr. Guertin informed the Board that there was an error in the roof walkway windows specified. He stated the windows should be a 15 light Anderson • window(#P3550) and not the 24 light window as shown previously. DRB Minutes October 10,2000 Page 2 of 6 • Mr. Greene made a motion to approve the 15 light Anderson window, #P3550. Mr. Durand seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Mr. Guertin then explained to the Board that there are drainage issues regarding the roof at Barton Square. He showed the Board the existing black outlet pipe coming out of the building. He stated that the water needs to be contained to prevent flooding. He pointed out on the plan the new City-installed underground drain. He continued that this plan calls for a horizontal drainpipe to be installed from the building outlet to the City drain with two new downspouts running down the Barton Square building. The proposal calls for painting the downspout pipes the same color as the brick and the 4" diameter PVC horizontal pipe will be painted the color of the stucco. Mr. Johnson asked if there were any plans proposed for the filled-in basement windows of the Barton Sq. building. Mr. Guertin responded that these windows will remain as they are. Mr. Johnson suggested that the drainpipe be installed below the stucco surface. Mr. Guertin replied that this cannot be done because at least a '/4"pitch is needed to pickup the inlet in the street. Mr. Durand asked where does the water go at this time. Mr. Guertin responded that there is • pump in place now, but it works very hard and this plan is being proposed to try to take the roof water off and have the pump only have to deal with rainwater. Mr. Durand suggested the pipe be installed internally through the building. Mr. Guertin responded that he did investigate this idea, and there is a lot of steel in this area that would make an internal pipe difficult to install. Mr. Greene expressed his concern with the pitch and the size of the drainpipe. Mr. Johnson asked if the bricks and stucco are on the same plane. Mr. Guertin replied in the affirmative. Mr. Durand also expressed his concern, and asked if the pipe could be installed below the basement windows. Mr. Greene asked if it would be possible to enter into the City drainpipe below grade. He concurred with Mr. Durand and felt the pipe should all be against the stucco surface and enter the City pipe below grade. Mr. Johnson requested that an alternative be investigated and the City Engineer be consulted. Mr. Guertin suggested that a site visit be scheduled. • At this time, Mr. Guertin explained to the Board that it is Mr. Weizmann's understanding that the new vinyl window approval included the wrapping of the windows with aluminum coil stock DRB Minutes October 10,2000 Page 3 of 6 • except for the rounded windows. Mr. Guertin informed the Board that the Building Inspector has stopped the installation of the aluminum wrapping. Ms. Dubinsky suggested that the Board members visit the site, and look at the windows and telephone their comments back to her whether the aluminum can remain or should be removed and the wood repaired. Peabody Essex Museum Fred Johnson recused himself from discussion and vote of this agenda item. David Jaquith joined the meeting at this time. A letter was received and made part of the record by Staley McDermet. In summary,the letter expressed Mr. McDermet's concerns regarding the Museum's deviation from City standard pavers, light fixtures and crosswalk. Mr. McDermet also voiced his concern regarding the treatment of the walls of the Marine Art Gallery and Saccon Jewelers building after the demolition of the Empire building. Attorney Correnti informed the Board that after the last meeting, there were specific outstanding • issues regarding the expansion plan. Today, the design team will present changes to the plan that address the DRB's concerns. Ms. Solano began by stating that one of the most talked about issues has been the connection and alignment of the walkway and the Armory Park arch. After studying several different designs, this new plan, showing a curved walkway that aligns with the arch has emerged. She stated that as a result of this new design, some of the walkway landscape has slightly changed, such as the shrubs stopping at a new point and being replaced by trees and a change in the fieldstone paving at the Charter Street side and a few small changes to the wall. The path is now a full 12"8" the entire length. Mr. Greene commented that he was very pleased with the new curved walkway, and added it brings a sense of intrigue to the plan. Mr. Jaquith also commented that he was pleased with the new design because it makes the building fagade better. At this time, Ms. Solano showed the Board updated Armory Square designs. She pointed out that the size of the corner space at New Liberty and Essex Streets have been increased and the 6' and 8' internal walkway paths have been flipped to accommodate better pedestrian flow. More benches have been added and the asphalt and brick edging have been brought around the benches. Six trash receptacles have also been placed. The receptacles will compliment the benches, but a specific model has not been chosen. • DRB Minutes October 10,2000 Page 4 of 6 • Ms. Solano showed the Board the fence detail for the park. She stated that some height studies still need to be done. Mr. Greene asked if there would be space on each side of the arch. Ms. Solano responded that she has not finalized that detail yet, and has considered using a flowering tree on each side. Ms. Solano explained to the Board that there have been discussions regarding the type of light fixture used in the expansion plan. She proposed that the light fixtures outside on the public sidewalk would be City standard fixtures and the Museum light fixtures would be used within Armory Park and the esplanade. Ms. Solano showed the Board a detail of the brick line on Essex Street where it is proposed that the City brick will be replaced with Museum brick. She also pointed out that a flush curb will be provided at all the crosswalks. Mr. Greene expressed his consent with the above proposals. Mr. Durand commented that he liked the landscaping, and the lighting scheme. He also felt that the Museum brick color is so close to the City brick, it will not pose a big impact and he had no problem with the Museum's brick proposal. • Mr. Jaquith commented that he has always been in favor of using the different brick. He was concerned that the park and esplanade be well lit. Ms. Solano stated that a photometric study is being done now, and she will submit it to the Board. Mr. Greene asked Ms. Solano to review the brick design. Ms. Solano responded that all the brick will be running bond except the crosswalk areas will be a herring bone pattern. Mr. Greene asked about the crosswalk edgings, specifically the use of cobblestones. He felt that in as many ways as possible the new crosswalks look like the rest of the City and felt the City standard edging be used. He stated that this detail be left outstanding. Mr. Greene asked if the handicap ramps meet ADA requirements. Ms. Solano responded that these ramps have been specifically developed for this project and they do meet the ADA dimensional requirements. Ms. Reed commented that she liked the brick design work, but she did feel that City bricks should be used in City streets. At this time, Mr. Michael Kim addressed the architectural changes made to the building design based on DRB comments. He explained that the light slots on the building fayade facing the esplanade have been increased by the width of a brick(4"). He showed a new section depicting this change. He stated that 100 square feet of gallery space has been lost. • Mr. Durand asked what is the total relief Mr. Kim responded that the total relief is now 16". DRB Minutes October 10,2000 Page 5 of 6 • The Board agreed that this is a positive change. Mr. Greene asked how the exposed walls will be treated once the Empire building is demolished. Attorney Correnti responded that there have been conversations with Mr. Van Dell, the owner of the Saccon building regarding cleaning of the wall. Currently the wall is concealed so we have to wait to actually see what condition the wall is in. Attorney Correnti stated that the Museum does want to be able to clean the Marine Arts Gallery building, but since the gallery owners have filed suit against the Museum, discussions regarding the wall are not proceeding at this time. However, the Museum does not own either building, so they cannot touch it without permission, but the Museum does want to beautify or even completely screen the walls. Mr. Greene stated that from a DRB point of view,the design of the public garden is incomplete without amelioration plans for those walls and the DRB will require that those walls be improved or screened. At this time, Attorney Correnti stated that a complete signage package will be submitted for review and approval at a latter date. Ms. Reed suggested that showing the Board a rough draft might save the Museum some time and effort in the end. Attorney Correnti thanked Ms. Reed for the suggestion and replied that a draft • will be developed for the Board to comment on. Ms. Reed asked if trash receptacles are being placed in the public garden area. Ms. Solano responded that they are not shown on the plan, but there will be receptacles. Mr. Greene stated that and updated planting plan and plant list need to be submitted. Mr. Greene made a motion to recommend the approval of schematic design plans as presented and updated today through the DRB process, subject to review and approval of the final design and detail drawings. Mr. Durand seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. (*A complete DRB Recommendation is attached) Mr. Greene thanked the Museum for responding to his concerns as they related to the public walkway and Armory Park. Mr. Phippen, on behalf of the Museum,thanked the Board for all their efforts and input during this design review process. There being no further business,the meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submitted, • Ellen S. Dubinsky DRB Minutes October 10,2000 Page 6 of 6 • Secretary • • DRB RECOMMENDATION Peabody Essex Museum (PEM) Expansion Plan After several Design Review Board (DRB) meetings, the following recommendations have been set forth for SRA action: These recommendations are based on plans submitted May 12, 2000 and revised October 12, 2000 and minutes of DRB meetings pertaining to the expansion. Schematic design drawings have been approved for the entire project with design details to follow based upon DRB comments. The design consultants are still refining details and will • submit them for DRB review upon completion. Correspondingly, SRA action should include a condition that states construction/working drawings detailing all exterior elements must be submitted for review by the DRB. These outstanding details are not limited to those that are listed below, and the DRB requests the right to require additional details that may have been omitted from the listings. Each section will summarize the proposed work and note recommendations requested by the DRB and revised by the design team. Essex Street Facades (North Elevation) The proposed work calls for construction of a new glazed entrance and roof element (spine) which runs from the north to south elevations and new windows added to the existing Dodge building. These new openings will reveal the Museum's gift shop to provide a retail presence along the Essex Streetfagade. DRB RECOMMENDATION: Approve as submitted. Five New Gallery Facades (East Elevation) The new gallery buildings will be cladded with brick and stone banding. Material samples were shown to the Board. Light slots divide each building. Per DRB recommendation, the depths of the light slots have been increased 4 inches,the width of a brick, which resulted in a total relief of 16 inches. • DRB Recommendation Peabody Essex Museum Expansion Plan Page 2 of 3 • DRB RECOMMENDATION: Approve gallery fapade brick and stone banding pattern with the material samples presented and with the revision of the light slot depth total depth to be sixteen inches. Charter Street Facades (South Elevation) This elevation shows brick and stone gallery facades and a south entrance/exit from the interior corridor. The Yin Yu Tang House will also be visible from this elevation. Per DRB recommendation, the interior vestibule has been expanded by eighteen inches and the exterior, south entrance was enlarged and more glazing was added to show one large glazed opening that is encased in limestone. Yin Yu Tang House/Glass Atrium The Yin Yu Tang House, its forecourt and central courtyard plan, atrium design and access, paving and landscaping plans were reviewed by the DRB. DRB RECOMMENDATION: Approve as submitted. Charter Street House Relocation Site Plan • Plans were submitted for the relocation of the two houses to two new lots created on Charter Street and the relocation of the school house. These plans have already been reviewed and approved by the DRB and SRA. DRB RECOMMENDATION: Approve final site plan as shown on revised plan dated October 12, 2000 page number SA.17. Public GardemEsplanade Plan In its original plan,the esplanade was a straight path that connected Essex Street to Charter Street, which resulted in the handicap ramps and the Armory Archway being misaligned. Following DRB comments, the walkway was revised to form a curve, aligning the handicap ramps and Armory Archway to create new view corridors. The entire width of the path is now 12'8". The location of the ancillary bluestone path has been relocated to the opposite side of the walkway. Due to this new walkway shape, some landscaping plans were altered, such as tree, shrub and groundcover selection and placement, shrub areas being reduced, and minor alterations to the fieldstone wall. DRB RECOMMENDATION: Approve revised plan with the conditions that requires the exposed walls of the Saccon Jewelers building and Marine Art Gallery building be improved or screened and proposed treatments plans be submitted for review; photometric plan • be submitted for review; revised planting plan and list be DRB Recommendation Peabody Essex Museum Expansion Plan Page 3 of 3 • updated and submitted for review; and final trash receptacle selection be submitted for review. Armory Square As per DRB recommendation, the design of Armory Square has been totally revised, as shown on revised plan sheet numberSA.16, Armory Square Detail Plan. The Archway now aligns with the Esplanade, there is a low iron fence on granite around the perimeter, the Revere Bell has been moved to the corner of the site, and the Second Corps Cadets sign will be placed on the drillshed wall. The Corps time line is now embedded in the ground by the drillshed wall. DRB RECOMMENDATION: Approve revised plan with the conditions that a photometric plan be submitted for review; final selection of trash receptacles and benches be submitted for review; fence height detail be submitted for review; and revised planting plan and list be updated and submitted for review. Roadway Design Pedestrian Mall Bricks Curbs Crosswalks Handicap Ramps Lighting and Signage • As shown on plan, use of a paving brick, complimentary to the City Standard brick, will be used to define the `precinct' of the Museum. This brick will also be used in the Esplanade and Armory Square. DRB RECOMMENDATION: Approved as submitted. Light Fixtures for the Esplanade and interior of Armory Square were submitted for review. As per DRB recommendation, the City Standard streetlights will be used on the public sidewalk. DRB RECOMMENDATION: Approve light fixtures as presented with the condition that the City Standard be used on the public sidewalk and that a photometric plan be submitted for review. Newly designed handicap ramps are shown on the plan. DRB RECOMMENDATION: Approve ramps as designed—must meet ADA requirements. Details of the crosswalk edgings have not been finalized. Brick pattern for pedestrian mall, sidewalk and roadway was approved, however, detail plans need to be submitted. • Signage plans have not been submitted and will be reviewed at a latter date. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MINUTES OF THE MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 28, 2000 The Design Review Board met in open session on Thursday, September 28, 2000 at 5:00 p.m. in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green. Those in attendance were: Paul Durand, Chris Greene, Don Giard, David Jaquith, Fred Johnson, and Meredith Reed. Executive Director Patrick Reffett was also in attendance. Peabody Essex Museum Expansion Plan Review Mr. Fred Johnson recused himself from discussion and vote on this agenda item. Ms. Solano began the presentation by stating that DRB comments regarding the redesign of Armory Park were taken into consideration, which resulted in a new design. She pointed out that the Revere Bell will be placed on the corner of Essex and New Liberty Streets to act as a landmark. There will be granite benches surrounding the area, and the bell will sit on a granite platform. A picket fence will surround the park, as shown. The fence will be placed on a curb and in order to convey that the fence is transparent only four piers will be used. The pickets will be 1" x 1" with 2"x 2"piers being used in various locations to secure the fence. • Mr. Greene asked that a detail of the fence be submitted. Ms. Solano then pointed out where the lights will be placed in the park and around the perimeter of the park and showed the Board a photograph of the proposed lights. She stated these lights have been chosen so they appear imbedded in the trees. She stated that there will be some specialty lighting at the arch, but these details are not finalized as of yet. She also stated that the proposal calls for replacing some City streetlights with the proposed park lights. Mr. Giard stated that no City streetlight should be replaced and any lights on the City's right-of- ways should conform to City standards. He added that he would like to see a larger version of the City's lights in the park/walkway designs. Mr. Reffett asked Ms. Solano to clarify the placement of the benches near the bell. Ms. Solano responded that the benches have been located so people can see the street and see the activity going on. Mr. Greene asked if the benches have backs. Ms. Solano responded the benches do not have backs. They are granite slabs. Mr.Reffett commented that the benches should allow people to face the nature being created in this park and not at the traffic. • Ms. Solano pointed out that there are several types of seating being used, and there are benches located within the park for people to enjoy the landscaping and eat their lunches. She showed a DRB Minutes September 28, 2000 • Page 2 of 8 photograph of the style benches, which are similar to the benches in Central Park with wooden seats and backs and metal uprights. She continued that the corner of the street where the bell is located is going to be an active place, groups will be congregating there and people will be waiting to be picked-up by vehicles that is why this seating was created. Ms. Solano began to discuss the materials for the paths. There will be brick used in the right-of- ways and the internal paths will be constructed of chip and seal asphalt and crushed stone, along the edgings bricks will be set flush with the paths. Granite pavers will be used by the drillshed for the veterans commemorative time line. There are also plans to use brick inside the breezeway,perhaps with commemorative inscriptions. She pointed out that the shrubs being proposed along the park have been replaced with ground cover. Mr. Greene commented that he is puzzled by the notion that the design of the Square has no correspondence to the design of the Esplanade. Being so close, it is almost one space, but there appears to be a deliberate change in the style, connections, plantings, and orientation. He continued that this feels like a missed opportunity. Ms. Solano responded that the design team has had very strong ideas relating these spaces to Salem and its urban fabric. She continued that the design incorporates hard spaces and soft spaces. The Esplanade is meant to be imbedded in the urban fabric. The park is more open, and • the two designs are a way to provide a difference between the two spaces. There are the same trees and ground cover being used in both spaces, but she felt that the two spaces did not need a direct relationship. Mr. Greene acknowledged that the two spaces work in different ways, but he stated that the Esplanade and the Arch need to be aligned or else the location of the arch is going to appear arbitrary. No one will understand its placement, and its meaning will be lost. He again stated that the Esplanade path or the arch should be shifted to align with one another. Mr. Greene continued to comment that he felt Armory Park has a split personality: on one hand, some features are detailed, elegant, defined, and refined and on the other hand, some are not— like the pathway approach and its resemblance to an old rural location. He stated that this is an urban location and the edgings on the paths should be finely detailed and granite should be used. He stated that the whole space should have a level of refinement which is appropriate for this City and for a new building. The space should not appear to fight with itself by being a half ruralesque common. He felt that the design team should go for it, and have this be an elegant space which will also correspond with the Esplanade and new building design. Ms. Solano responded that she felt differently and went on to explain her reasoning behind the use of materials and design of the park. She stated that the walkways were not bordered in granite because she does not want the visual contrast. She realized that the walkways were important, but the design is made to highlight the atmosphere of the space—a self-contained • space where the walkways are calm. The special materials and details are saved for the special areas of the park, e.g. the time line. DRB Minutes September 28, 2000 • Page 3 of 8 Mr. Giard reiterated his concern that the Esplanade path and the arch align. Ms. Solano responded that these are separate spaces and she does not see that years from now these spaces being so closely associated. She continued that moving the Esplanade would cut up the green space too much. She continued that in cities streets do not always line up, and as long as you can see the object, it is not necessary to have it aligned. Mr. Reffett commented that the views you remember when you are visiting a city are those that align with a path you are walking, and the closer you get to this feature the more exciting it becomes. He continued that the open spaces are designed to pull people from one end to the other, and the alignment is needed to `connect the dots'. Ms. Solano commented that in older cities, such as Paris and Rome things do not line up. Mr. Giard commented that the two spaces have been designed at the same time, and it seems disingenuous to make them appear as if they were built at different times. Ms. Reed commented that she felt Armory Square related to the Esplanade and new buildings. Mr. Jaquith stated that it is perplexing that the archway does not align with the walkway. He continued that if it were aligned it would provide a `goal post'. • Mr. Durand commented that he was in favor oialigning the pathway and arch. He felt the offset is antagonistic and it is not natural not to go across the street in a straight line. He asked why this change is such a big deal. Mr. Jaquith also asked why moving the arch is such a big deal. He stated that the arch is not the original arch from the Armory. It is only a reproduction. Ms. Solano commented that the Museum has been working closely with the Second Corps Cadets, and as a result of these meetings,the arch has been located in its original position. Mr. Giard suggested that the Esplanade path could be pivoted to align the arch. Mr. Durand suggested that the end of the Essex Street walkway could be widened. Mr. Jaquith stated that it should be explained to the Corps. that the archway would take on more importance and prominence if it were aligned with the walkway. Mr. Greene commented that it is important to keep the handicap ramps straight. Ms. Dubinsky stated that there is a very active Handicap Commission in the City and a private agency, the Assisted Living Center that the plans could be shown to for comments. • Ms. Solano stated that she would study the different alternatives suggested by the DRB to align the walkway with the arch. DRB Minutes September 28, 2000 • Page 4 of 8 Attorney Correnti asked the Board to clearly define the options the Board wanted to see for re- alignment. Ms. Reed responded that the architects should find a way to make the arch and the walkway line- up. Mr. Greene responded to Mr. Correnti stating that the Board is asking for an amendment to the design so the archway is on axis with the path and the handicap ramps are directly across the street from each other. Mr. Greene stated his concern for the grass being worn out at the corners of the paths in Armory Square. Ms. Solano stated that one of the major reasons a path becomes worn is if you have not taken into consideration where people will walk. The Armory Square design has considered pedestrian movement. She continued that there are many functional things that are being done to protect the grass such as: (1) special soils are being used to help with compaction; (2) an irrigation system is being installed; and (3)the Peabody Essex Museum will be provided with maintenance procedures. • Mr. Greene expressed some doubt whether these measures will be sufficient. He continued that the path from the National Park Service to the arch will have large crowds, which can cause wear and tear on the edges. The Square will be an extremely, intensively, used place and it needs to be `armored'. He stated that aesthetically the paths are fine, but he was worried about maintenance. Mr. Greene, Mr. Durand and Mr. Jaquith suggested that the path be made wider. Mr. Reffett agreed and pointed out that the paths are already different widths. Ms. Solano responded that the widths of the paths have been designed to incorporate the hierachy of travel. Mr. Reffett stated that it is always valuable to have more capacity, especially since there will be large amounts of people traveling both ways on the same path. Ms. Reed commented that hierarchy shown does not seem correct. Mr. Jaquith agreed, and continued that the path that links to the Peabody Essex Museum is larger, but in reality there will be more foot traffic on the path linking the arch to the Visitor Center and garage. • DRB Minutes September 28, 2000 • Page 5 of 8 Mr. Greene concurred that the path from the arch to the National Park Service is not wide enough. He also asked why the space in front of the drillshed was widened which resulted in loosing grass area. At this time Mr. Andrew Barassi from John Droll's office addressed the DRB. This firm is designing the commemorative pieces in Armory Square. He stated that the time line, which will highlight the inception of the Second Corps Cadets to present day, has been designed in that area with 2' granite pieces and slightly elevated (1/4") cast bronze plaques. In addition,this area allows you to step back and see the Second Corps. Cadets name being placed on the drill shed wall. Mr. Greene commented that the elevation of the plaques could cause problems during snow removal and could result in the chipping of the plaques and/or granite. Mr. Barassi responded that this area would be hand shoveled. Mr. Greene commented that something needs to be done so people do not walk over the plaques. Mr. Barassi responded that plantings are being proposed. Mr. Greene responded that there still needs to be something else done. Mr. Greene then commented that there will be tremendous circulation around the proposed bell • area, and there does not seem to be enough room between the bell stand and the handicap ramp. He suggested the bell be moved back to create a bigger corner so people will not spill into the street. Mr. Durand, Mr. Jaquith and Mr. Giard agreed with Mr. Greene's comments. Mr. Barassi continued that there will be inscriptions on the base of the bell. Mr. Greene asked where the Revere bell came from. Mr. Grimes responded from the East or South Church. Mr. Greene asked if the bell would have the capability to ring. Mr. Phippen responded that this is still being analyzed. Hopefully, it will be made operable so it can be used for special occasions. Mr. Barassi continued that there will be a dedication element under the arch that would be sandblasted into granite stone, and the arch will be lit with specialty lighting. The replica of the Second Corps Cadets sign will be placed on the drillshed wall. It will be reconstructed out of sandstone and the letters will be raised and lithochromed. Mr. Greene asked if the size of the sign equaled the original. Mr. Barassi responded that the new sign will be larger. There will also be accommodations to integrate bunting and flags on the drillshed wall. Mr. Barassi stated that plans are being developed for bricks along the breezeway that may have veterans' names inscribed on them. Mr. Grimes stated that this is still being discussed with the Second Corps Cadets. • DRB Minutes September 28, 2000 • Page 6 of 8 Mr. Grimes also stated that it is important to the Second Corps Cadets that the archway be located in its original place. At this time, the DRB discussed each issue listed on the Peabody Museum Expansion Concern Chart. Public Right of Way—City Standard Brick&Lights Mr. Greene stated that City standard brick and lights be used on the public right of way. Mr. Giard agreed. Mr. Jaquith stated he did not have a tremendous problem with the use of the complimentary brick, but felt that the lighting should adhere to the City standard. Mr. Durand stated that he was in favor of the complimentary brick at the last meeting, but he walked the site and realized he liked the consistency of the City brick and could not find a logical place to transition from one brick to the other. Therefore, he now felt that the City standard brick and lights should be used in the right of ways. Mr. Jaquith asked the Museum to prove their stand on the transition of the bricks, and if they cannot, the Board would insist on the City standard lighting and bricks. • Ms. Solano stated that she did show the board transition plans. Mr. Durand requested that she better clarify her plans. She also stated that the Museum is willing to repair the bricks. Ms. Dubinsky stated that she would contact the City Engineer to obtain his recommendations, since his department would be responsible for the right of ways. The Board agreed that all the lights on public property should adhere to the City standard and also expressed that they would like to see the lights in Armory Park be the City lighting. A photometric plan was also requested by the Board for their review. Roadway The concern regarding the roadway has mostly been solved by a redesign of the circulation pattern, allowing Essex Street to Hawthorne Boulevard be a two-way street, the widening of the street and resetting of curbs, and the change in treatment of the street by removing most of the bricks and by the redesign of the crosswalks to be highlighted on each side by brick. The Board requested that the updated drawing reviewed by the Planning Board be submitted to the DRB. Mr. Giard asked if the crosswalks could be highlighted with cobblestones like many other • crosswalks in the downtown. Mr. Durand and Mr. Jaquith stated that there could be ordinance DRB Minutes September 28, 2000 • Page 7 of 8 and/or safety restrictions regarding crosswalks, and this should be addressed through the Police Department. Mr. Greene stated that this issue does require attention. He stated that the paving detailing be coordinated to ensure that Police Department and ADA requirements are met. Esplanade Mr. Greene stated that he did not object to the lawns not being elevated, but did reiterate that he felt this will cause maintenance problems. The Board concurred with the photograph submitted for the detail of the fieldstone wall. The Board is not requiring that the path end by Charter Street be widened. Armor The Board is requiring that the arch and the path be aligned; the width of the path from the arch to the Visitor Center be increased; and the space around the bell be increased. The Board stated that they would allow the Museum to decide if edging should be used along the paths, but did recommend it. • The Board requested fence details and how the fence works at the base. The Board requested that a photometric plan be submitted for review. The Board requested details of the benches and of the area surrounding the bell. Mr. Greene asked the length of the bench. Ms. Solano responded the benches will be 5'-6'. The Board requested details and location plans of all the commemorative elements in the park. The Board requested that trash can details and locations be submitted for review. Essex Street Pedestrian Mall Facade Mr. Giard stated that he would like to see more glazing on the Essex Street facades. He showed the Board a sketch he drafted that creates display cases on the outside lip of the Dodge building by bringing glass straight down from the over hang. Attorney Correnti commented that this is an institutional building not a former retail building. Mr. Giard responded that it is within the context of a retail area and other retail buildings. The rest of the members of the Board agreed that it would be nice to see some more glazing, but • this is not an issue the members feel strong enough about to request a change in the plans. DRB Minutes September 28, 2000 • Page 8 of 8 Interior Arcade/Charter Street Elevation The Board agreed that the alternative glass entry and enlargement of the interior doorway is acceptable. New Gallery Facades Mr. Greene stated that row of five galleries is too unarticulated of an expanse; if there was more articulation, it would be a more successful design. Mr. Jaquith agreed that the facades need to be better. He stated that the architects refer to them as houses, so they need to get these buildings to look more like individual houses. Mr. Durand stated that if more reveal, more of a shadow line is created this would be acceptable. The Board requested that the plans be amended to either pull the brick out or move the glass in so there is more of a shadow line/separation of the buildings. Attorney Correnti thanked the Board for their guidance and stated that the outstanding issues will be addressed at the next meeting, and hopefully this project can receive a recommendation that can be brought to the SRA meeting on October 11, 2000. • There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. The next DRB meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, October 10, 2000, at 5:00 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Ellen Dubinsky • 09/18/00 MON 09:41 FAX 978 740 0404 Planning 0 002 • ` .a Salem Redevelopment Authority DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 18, 2000 5:00 p.m. Roll Call: Paul Durand Donald Giard Chris Greene David Jaquith Fred Johnson �~ Meredith Reed Agenda: I. Cabot Money Management—216 Essex Street—Roof Replacement 2. Derby Street Parking Lot—Derby Street—Plan Review 3. Peabody Essex Museum—Continuation of Review of Expansion Plan nmaro�e.•a, . One Salem Green • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978-) 740-0404 mart rr6 ,• • i 09/18/00 MON 09:42 FAX 978 740 0404 Planning Z002 Salem ® Redevelopment Authority DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 18, 2000 5:00 P.M. Roll Call: Paul Durand Donald Giard • Chris Greene David Jaquith Fred Johnson Meredith Reed Agenda: 1. Cabot Money Management—216 Essex Street—Roof Replacement 2. Derby Street Parking Lot—Derby Street—Plan Review 3. Peabody Essex Museum—Continuation of Review of Expansion Plan edldrb\ngende II i i One Salem Green • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 - (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 09 ,.8/00 MON 09:41 FAX 978 740 0404 Planning X001 t_. One Salem Green.Salem.MA 01970 - --� 978-745-9595.ext 311 Salem 979-740-0404.fax Redevelopment Authority SEP' 8 2 J Fax -� To: Fred Johnson—744-OD36 From: Ellen Dubinsky Chris Greene—617-536-0626 Paul Durand—741-0240 Don Giard—740-0404 Meredith Reed—744-1588 David Jaquith—927-0068 Fara Pages: 2(not including cover sheet) Phone; Date: September 18. 2000 No: DRB Meeting CC: ❑Urgent X For Review ❑Please Comment ❑Please Reply ❑Please Recycle Reminder ----- �t DRB Meeting Monday, September 18, 2000 at 5:00 pm. Please call me if you are unable to attend. Thank you. • DRB MINUTES September 18, 2000 The Design Review Board met in open session on Monday, September 18, 2000 at 5:00 p.m. in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green. Those in attendance were: Paul Durand, Chris Greene, Fred Johnson, Meredith Reed, David Jaquith(late), and Don Giard (late). SRA Executive Director Patrick Reffett was also present. Cabot Money Management—316 Essex Street—Roof& Flashing Replacement Ms. Dubinsky presented an application to replace the flat roof at Cabot Money Management. The roof will be a rubber roof, and it is not visible from any public way. However, the flashing, currently zinc, will be replaced with copper, and is visible, as shown in the submitted photographs. Mr. Greene made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Paul Durand seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Derby Street Parking Design Plans • Mr. Reffett informed the Board that Don Giard has produced a plan for parking and landscaping for the area next to the Sumner Paint Building. Mr. Greene commented that he felt the path was too close to the property line and suggested removing a parking space, reconfiguring the middle tree island and straightening out the path. He continued that the lost space could be regained in the rear of the lot. He also suggested that a tree be added to the middle island. Mr. Durand questioned whether a handicap space was required. Mr. Reffett responded that will be researched and a handicap space will be added if required. Mr. Greene was asked to suggest a tree variety. He commented that some type of master planting plan be developed for the South River, since this is only a small part of a future renovation along the River. He stated he would investigate the type of tree used in a similar project designed by his firm. Peabody Essex Museum—Expansion Plan Fred Johnson recused himself from discussion and vote on this agenda item. Attorney Joseph Correnti addressed the Board stating that this meeting will address two issues that have been redesigned as a result of DRB comments. The first being modifications to the 40 south entrance and the second being a redesign of Armory Square. DRB Minutes September 18, 2000 • Page 2 of 5 Mr. Michael Kim,project architect, explained to the Board that modifications have been made to address the concerns expressed at the last meeting regarding the south entrance. As a result of these comments,the vestibule has been expanded by 1 %2' and the exterior has changed from a two floor design to one large case opening that is cased in limestone. Let the record show that David Jaquith joined the meeting at this time (4:20 p.m.). Mr. Durand commented that although the elevator has not been relocated, which was the original comment, this plan does address some of the concerns that were expressed. Mr. Jaquith asked how will people know that they will be able to enter on Essex Street and travel down the interior to Charter Street. Attorney Correnti responded that a signage plan is being prepared to make known that this interior space is open to the public and will be presented to Planning Board and DRB. Let the record show that Don Giard joined the meeting at this time (5:35 p.m.). Mr. Jaquith asked what material would be used for the interior floor. • Mr. Kim responded that a flat granite in 6 x 6 sections will be hand laid. Mr. Jaquith asked what material would be used for the interior bridge rail. Mr. Kim responded it would be a glass rail. Mr. Greene commented that this redesign is a significant improvement. Mr. Durand commented he was satisfied with the redesign. At this time, Ms. Laura Solano addressed the Board. She began by showing a photograph of the type of fence that will be used around the properties of the two houses in their new Charter Street location. The fence is wooden and will sit on the retaining wall. Mr. Greene and Mr. Jaquith concurred with the selection. The second issue she discussed was the planting palette for the landscaping around the houses. She distributed a plant list and photographs of the different, trees, shrubs and vines being proposed. Mr. Greene commented that the plant list was fine, but he did have a concern with the trees being placed between the driveways. • DRB Minutes September 18, 2000 • Page 3 of 5 Ms. Solano responded that the trees are needed to remove the starkness between the two buildings. The tree lawn is 8', which is bigger than most lawns, and the trees will be placed very carefully so they will not interfere with the opening of car doors. At this time, Ms. Solano showed diagrams of the existing paving pattern down the Essex Street Mall and a diagram of the proposed changes. The proposal calls for taking back 2 units of existing brick to provide for the new running bond paving pattern. Mr. Giard asked if a different brick would be used. Ms. Solano responded that a different brick would be used, but it is complimentary to the existing brick and the new building brick. Mr. Jaquith suggested that some type of band be used where the brick stops by the Kiernan property on Liberty Street. Mr. Green suggested that a band be used on Essex Street where brick changes. Mr. Giard commented that he felt strongly that the brick should not change and all public right of ways use the City standard brick. • Mr. Jaquith stated he agreed with Mr. Greene that a transition is needed, but he did not have a problem using a different brick. Ms. Solano showed a plan of the new brick paving that would encompass the whole `precinct'. She stated that similar issues concerning the first proposed brick roadway were brought up at the Planning Board. Three of the major issues were maintenance, safety, and readability. In response to those concerns,the asphalt was put back on the roadway and brick will only be used at the crosswalks. This will be the same brick as the City, but will be laid in a different pattern and placed on edge. It may also require some type of granite edge detail. However, she stated that a connection needs to be made to show that all the different buildings are part of the Museum campus. Mr. Greene agreed that it is a good idea that the brick is different, as it shows that the Museum is on two sides of the street. He encouraged that the new brick sidewalk be used all the way down to Hawthorne Boulevard. At this time, Ms. Solano reviewed the landscaping for the YYT House. She showed how the house was sited on the property and explained that there would be two access points to the house. One is through the auditorium and the other is through the Museum interior courtyard. The house a vacant forecourt, which is typical and a system of steps and platforms created with sandstone. She explained that this is a very small space with a lot of grade, but the house has been made handicap accessible, and she showed the accessible path. The plantings as shown • will consist of large trees, shrubs and bamboo. DRB Minutes September 18, 2000 • Page 4 of 5 Mr. Greene noticed that a fence was showing on the plan between the new addition and the YYT rear entry. Ms. Solano confirmed that a metal picket fence will be installed for security purposes. Mr. Durand asked how tall the bamboo would grow. Ms. Solano answered that the bamboo shown can grow between 12 and 15 feet. At this time, Ms. Solano began to discuss the redesign of Armory Square. She stated that as a result of several DRB comments, the park has been redesigned. Comments included: -Tracing of the original Armory building boundaries did not have to occur -Pedestrian Circulation Concerns -Lack of Hierarchy of Open Spaces -Separation of Active to Passive Space Areas -Lack of Linking with Drill Shed The new plan reflects the DRB comments and the space is made to feel more like a common. The walkways now lead to logical destinations, the arch remains in its original location, and a fence has been added that is similar to the one surrounding Plummer Hall. She stated there are still more details that need to be finalized. • At this time, John Grimes spoke to the commemorative aspects of the park. He stated that John Roll has been working with the veteran community to redesign the commemorative pieces of the park. The memorial wall containing a timeline of the Second Corps Cadets history has now been moved and sits horizontally as a granite walkway along the outside of the Drillshed. Also,the Bell has been relocated closer to New Liberty Street sidewalk. There are also plans to place the Second Corp Cadets engraved stone on the Drillshed wall and a dedication of the park inscription under the archway. Mr. Greene asked if the fire escape on the side of Plummer Hall will be removed. Ms. Solano replied that the fire escape will remain. Mr. Jaquith asked for more information regarding the proposed fence. Ms. Solano responded that a cast iron fence on top of granite curbing is envisioned. Specific fence pattern has not been determined at this time. Mr. Greene commented that he preferred this design better than the previous one. He continued that he liked the Common theme but the detailing will be very important as he felt that there be some indication given through the design that this is not an old park, so it should read as a new open space. Mr. Giard agreed that the site planing is much better in the new design. • DRB Minutes September 18, 2000 • Page 5 of 5 Ms. Reed asked what types of trees will be planted in the park. Ms. Solano responded that a variety of Asian trees would most likely be chosen. Mr. Reffett asked Ms. Solano to comment on how the arch relates to the design. Ms. Solano stated that the arch is viewed as an archeological remnant that will be imbedded in the trees. Mr. Reffett commented that as an urban design element such as this arch is usually used at a place of culmination or direction, and it being placed off center of the public esplanade, it would lose its visual benefit. Mr. Greene stated that the original arch was positioned on a set of stairs and not on the ground as this is being proposed. He also wanted Ms. Solano to clarify that this arch is not an artifact of the building, but a newly constructed element made to look like the original. Ms. Solano responded that Mr. Greene was correct and the arch is being fabricated. Mr. Greene commented on several sections of the plan he pointed out that need more work, including lighting and that he felt one of the three paths shown is not necessary and he also suggested that the paths have more of a curve to make them look more contemporary. Ms. Solano responded that the layouts of the pathways have been planned to incorporate future plans for the Essex Institute gardens. Mr. Greene commented that he liked the fact that the trees are • placed in a random pattern. The Board concurred that the next meeting be held on Thursday, September 28, 2000 at 5:00 p.m. There being no further discussion, the meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Ellen S. Dubinsky Secretary • IAL Salem Redevelopment Authority DRB RECOMMENDATIONS from meeting held on September 18, 2000 Cabot Money Management— 316 Essex Street —Roof& Flashing Replacement An application was reviewed by the DRB to replace the flat roof at Cabot Money Management. The roof will be a rubber roof, and it is not visible from any public way. However, the flashing, currently zinc; will be replaced with copper, and is visible, as shown in the submitted photographs. DRB RECOMMENDATION: Approve as presented. Derby Street Parking Design Plans • Plans were reviewed to create a parking area with landscaping for a lot owned by the City of Salem on Derby Street. The lot is next to the Sumner Paint Building. The Planning Department's Urban Planner Don Giard prepared the design. DRB RECOMMENDATION: Approve plan with the following conditions: (1) a parking space be removed from the front portion of the lot to allow for the path to be reconfigured so it is not as close to the property line; (2)the middle tree island be reconfigured and the path straightened out; (3)the lost space be regained in the rear of the lot; (4) a tree be added to the middle island; and (5) a handicap space be added as required by ADA standards. Mr. Giard asked Mr. Greene for recommendations regarding types of trees. Mr. Greene stated he would investigate a species of tree used in a similar project done by his firm. • One Salem Green • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 > (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 AL DRB MINUTES September 11,2000 (Site Visit to Peabody Block) A meeting of the Design Review Board was held on September 11, 2000, at the Peabody Block. Those in attendance were: Paul Durand, Don Giard, and Meredith Reed. Peabody Block— Site Visit Haim Weizmann, Ray Guertin and George Eisner were present to review various details for the Peabody Block. The Board first inspected the three paint samples for the stucco areas of the building. The Board favored the dark beige sample on the left of the building, but allowed Mr. Weizmann to paint the stucco—Glidden Pure White HD-1601, as this was the color he preferred. Mr. Guertin then showed the DRB sample black finished light fixtures for the Phoenix School entrance and balcony area. The Board approved the following: light fixtures for the Phoenix School entrance-Noral City, which will be surface mounted and light fixtures for the Phoenix Balcony area—Noral Roulette II, which will be bracket mounted. • Mr. Guertin showed the Board a sample of the blue awning color that is proposed for the Phoenix awnings. The Board approved this blue color sample. As shown in previous drawings, the awnings will be placed on all the school windows in Lappin Park and on Washington Street. There will be the vinyl logo of the school on two of the windows and the entrance awning will be box style. Mr. Guertin then showed the Board plans for the new pilaster entry on the Peabody Building. Mr. Giard thought the pilasters should be wider. Mr. Guertin responded that the pilaster are being replicated to match the previous size of the pilasters that were original to the building, and pointed out the outline of the pilasters that could still be seen on the building. The Board approved Mr. Guertin's plan as presented. The Board then walked to the Barton Square side of the building (rear of the Peabody Building) where Mr. Weizmann proposed painting some of the brick the stucco color. The DRB did not approve the painting of the brick and requested the architect provide other alternatives for treating the brick patched wall area. The Board continued to the Gas & Light where Mr. Guertin explained that due to Code requirements energy saving glass is required for the middle window area which means two pieces of glass need to joined at the center. Mr. Guertin stated that a clear joint will be used on the outside and a painted metal tube, approximately 1 '/a "will join the inside. The tube will be • painted a color that will blend into the interior of the building. The Board allowed this change. • Lastly,the Board was shown the pediments proposed for the two windows in the connector core building (Washington Street fagade). The Board approved these arched and triangular pediments as presented. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Ellen S. Dubinsky Secretary • • Salem Redevelopment Authority DRB RECOMMENDATIONS August 31, 2000 & September 11, 2000 Wesley United Methodist Church—North Street— Sign Application A site visit was held at the Church to finalize the design of the sign. The sign is a 4' x 4', free standing with a reader board area. The sign will be placed perpendicular to the building. DRB RECOMMENDATION: Approve as presented with the conditions that the sides extending from the frame be reduced and the thickness of the base be reduced and be colored to match the existing granite on the building, and the sign be set back to align with the drain area on the front lawn. (As a result of conversations with the sign manufacturer, • some of these conditions can not be accomplished. Staff is now working with the manufacturer to reach a solution.) Dunkin Donuts/Baskin Robbins—282 Derby Street—Awning Application Mr. Robert Jackson, storeowner, appeared before the Board with an application for awnings over the windows at 282 Derby Street. The valances will have 10" letters of the store name, alternating between Dunkin Donuts and Baskin Robbins. The awnings will be maroon and the lettering beige/white. Lighting will be installed underneath to light the walkway and sign. DRB RECOMMENDATION: Approve the location and colors, but instead of awning,just use a fabric band that extends out from the building with fluorescent lighting underneath. Awnings can remain over the doorways, and the Board suggested that awning be made a deep as possible. Tabernacle Church— 50 Washington Street—Elevator Tower Addition Mr. Ray Portafila, architect, and Mr. Doug Karam, Church member, appeared before the Board with plans to construct an elevator tower on the Federal Street fagade of the building and to demolish a garage which sets on top of cinder blocks to create parking. The existing stones taken from the building will be reused to create the bottom foundation of the elevator entry. The • material being used on the upper portion will be lead coated copper designed, as shown on the plans. The awning shown is not part of this proposal, but it will be constructed at a later phase. One Salem Green • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 • DRB RECOMMENDATION: Approve elevator building as presented with the condition that the stone base on the front use more stone and the side view be continued with the lead coated copper with smaller stone base. The Board approved the demolition of the garage. Grenquist's Ice Cream Emporium—2 Lynde Street— Sign Application & Window Replacement Mr. Scott Grenquist appeared before the Board with an application to erect a sign above the window front at 2 Lynde Street and to replace the multi pane window with a single pane of glass. The sign will have a dark green border with a light green background and black lettering. DRB RECOMMENDATION: No action was taken on this proposal. Several suggestions were made by the Board regarding the sign and window. The applicant was asked to resubmit his application. Peabody Block— Site Visit The DRB met at the Peabody Block on Monday 9/11 and approved the following: Stucco color—Glidden Pure White HD-1601. . Light fixtures for the Phoenix School entrance—Noral City Light fixtures for the Phoenix Balcony area—Noral Roulette II Pediments for the two windows in the connector core building (Washington Street fagade) Blue awning color sample for Phoenix School Pilaster design for the entry on the Peabody Building Glass design for Gas & Light Building to use a clear joint connection of the front middle pane of glass with an 1 3/4"metal connection on the inside to be painted a color that will blend into the interior of the building. Discussion ensued regarding the painting of the brick on the rear of the Peabody building, Barton Square fapade. The DRB did not approve the painting of the brick and requested the architect provide other alternatives for treating the brick patched wall area. • MINUTES OF THE MEETING • OF THE BOARD OF THE SALEM REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HELD ON SEPTEMBER 13, 2000 A regular meeting of the Salem Redevelopment Authority was held on Wednesday, September Se 13 2000 at 6:00 .m p . Chairman Curran called the meeting to order and on roll call, the following members answered present: Michael Connelly, Robert Curran, and Russ Vickers. Conrad Baldini and Kevin Daly were excused. Executive Director Patrick Reffett and Staff Assistant Mary Crain were also present. MINUTES Chairman Curran called for approval of the minutes of the SRA meetings held on August 9, 2000. Mr. Vickers made a motion to approve the minutes as presented. Mr. Connelly seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. DISCUSSION/NEW BUSINESS Peabody Essex Museum Expansion Plan—DRB Update Mr. Reffett updated the Board regarding the Design Review Board meetings held for the expansion plans for the Peabody Essex Museum (PEM). He stated that the DRB has met four times and has reviewed the new building and landscaping designs. The PEM's design team is now studying the DRB's comments. He continued that some of the issues raised were also raised at the Planning Board meetings such as the traffic patterns along New Liberty Street and Essex Street. These have been changed to result in a two-way roadway from Essex Street to Hawthorne Boulevard. Mr. Connelly informed the Board that the Museum's plan to subdivide the Charter Street lots has been recorded at the Registry. DRB Recommendations The following recommendations were presented for the SRA's action: Tabernacle Church—SO Washington Street—Elevator Tower Addition Ms. Dubinsky presented plans that were reviewed by the DRB to construct an elevator tower on the Federal Street fagade of the building and to demolish a garage on the property which sets on top of cinder blocks to create parking. The existing stones taken from the building will be reused to create the bottom foundation of the elevator entry. The material being used on the upper portion will be lead coated copper designed, as shown on the plans. The awning shown is not part of this proposal, but it will be constructed at a later phase. • SRA Minutes September 13, 2000 Page 2 of 5 • DRB RECOMMENDATION: Approve elevator building as presented with the condition that the stone base on the front use more stone and the side view be continued with the lead coated copper with smaller stone base. The Board approved the demolition of the garage. Mr. Connelly made a motion to approve the DRB recommendation for the Tabernacle Church. Mr. Vickers seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Wesley United Methodist Church—North Street—Sign Application Ms. Dubinsky informed the SRA that the DRB has reviewed this sign application and made several design changes. The DRB has also visited the site. As a result, the DRB issued a positive recommendation for a 4' x 4', free standing with a reader board area. The sign will be placed perpendicular to the building. The structural base and sides will be black. The `Wesley Church' sign area will have a maroon background. Ms. Dubinsky noted that free standing signs are not allowed in the Urban Renewal Area, however, it has been the practice to allow such signs for churches, so as not to deface their building with signage. DRB RECOMMENDATION: Approve as presented with the conditions that the sides • extending from the frame be reduced and brought all the way up to the top of the sign, the thickness of the base be reduced, and the sign be set back to align with the drain area on the front lawn. Mr. Vickers made a motion to approve the DRB recommendations for the Wesley Church sign. Mr. Connelly seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Dunkin Donuts/Baskin Robbins—282 Derby Street—Awning Application An application was reviewed by the DRB for awnings over the windows at 282 Derby Street. The valances will have 10" letters of the store name, alternating between Dunkin Donuts and Baskin Robbins. The awnings will be maroon and the lettering beige/white. Lighting will be installed underneath to light the walkway and sign. DRB RECOMMENDATION: Approve the location and colors, but instead of awning,just use a fabric band that extends out from the building with fluorescent lighting underneath. Awnings can remain over the doorways, and the Board suggested that awning be made a deep as possible. Ms. Dubinsky noted that the plan being reviewed this evening has been redrawn to incorporate the DRB recommendations. SRA Minutes September 13, 2000 Page 3 of 5 • Mr. Connelly made a motion to approve the plan submitted that incorporates the DRB recommendations for Dunkin Donuts. Mr. Vickers seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Grenquist's Ice Cream Emporium—2 Lynde Street—Sign Application & Window Replacement Ms. Dubinsky reported that Mr. Scott Grenquist appeared before the Board with an application to erect a sign above the window front at 2 Lynde Street and to replace the multi pane window with a single pane of glass. The sign will have a dark green border with a light green background and black lettering. No action was taken on this proposal. Several suggestions were made by the Board regarding the sign and window. The applicant was asked to resubmit his application. Peabody Block—Site Visit Ms. Dubinsky reported that the DRB met at the Peabody Block on Monday 9/11 and approved the following on-site details: Stucco color—Glidden Pure White HD-1601. Light fixtures for the Phoenix School entrance—Noral City Light fixtures for the Phoenix Balcony area—Noral Roulette II Pediments for the two windows in the connector core building (Washington Street fagade) Blue awning color sample for Phoenix School • Pilaster design for the entry on the Peabody Building Glass design for Gas & Light Building to use a clear joint connection of the front middle pane of glass with an 1 3/<"metal connection on the inside to be painted a color that will blend into the interior of the building. Discussion ensued regarding the painting of the brick on the rear of the Peabody building (Barton Square fagade). The DRB did not approve the painting of the brick and requested the architect provide other alternatives for treating the brick patched wall area. Mr. Connelly made a motion to approve the DRB site decisions as presented. Mr. Vickers seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Higginson Block— 14 Derby Square— Window& Door Installation Ms. Dubinsky stated that the applicant appeared before the DRB with revisions to their plan to construct a French door system and round windows on the top floor of the Higginson Block. Per the DRB's recommendation, the detail above the doors has been changed to imitate the pattern that appears in existing windows, and the transom light has been removed. Also, more detail was provided for the divided light round windows and French doors. DRB RECOMMENDATION: Approve as submitted. Mr. Connelly made a motion to approve the DRB recommendations as presented. Mr. Vickers • seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. SRA Minutes September 13, 2000 Page 4 of 5 Old Police Station—RFP Update Ms. Crain reported that a site visit was held on August 22, and over 30 people walked through the facility. The attendees consisted of architects, developers and realtors. She also stated that she has scheduled additional site visits for some prospective bidders later this month. In general, she informed the Board that there has been a tremendous amount of activity and interest in this redevelopment project. A variety of uses are being explored such as residential, bed& breakfast, and even a cyber district use. Chairman Curran updated Mr. Vickers that the SRA issued an RFP that had no responses, which resulted in a new RFP being issued that did not include a specific use or a specific purchase price for the structure. The current RFP responses are due at the end of this month. Mr. Reffett stated that the proposals will be ranked based on taxes generated to the city; restoration plans for the building; and ability of the developer to secure financing for their proposed project. Mr. Vickers asked if the criteria were specified in the RFP. Ms. Crain responded in the affirmative, and she stated that she would deliver a copy of the RFP to Mr. Vickers. Mr. Vickers asked what the timeline was for selecting a developer. Mr. Reffett responded that he would like the SRA to begin the selection process as soon as possible. • Museum Place Mall—Easement Use Request Ms. Crain reported that she has received a request from the manager of the Museum Place Mall to use the public walkways in the Mall for a Business to Business Expo. She stated that the Mall has provided the SRA with a Certificate of Insurance for the event. Ms. Crain stated that this event was held last year. Mr. Vickers made a motion to allow Museum Place Mall use of the public walkways for the Business to Business Expo. Mr. Connelly seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Church Street Parking Lot—Exit Relocation Mr. Reffett informed the Board that the exit to the Church Street Parking Lot is being moved from Federal Street to Church Street. He explained the Federal Street exit forced vehicles onto Washington Street and by allowing cars to exit onto Church Street, drivers have several options to travel to different parts of the City. He stated this relocation will result in the downtown traffic circulation being more efficient and allow people to travel in, out and around the City. Mr. Connelly made a motion to approve the relocation of the Church Street Parking Lot exit. Mr. Vickers seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. • SRA Minutes September 13, 2000 Page 5 of 5 Main Street Program Mr. Reffett informed the Board that as they may have read in the newspaper, Mayor Usovicz in conjunction with the Salem Partnership has initiated a Main Streets Program for the downtown. Ms. Rosemary Powers, Executive Director of the Partnership, has had hands on experience running Main Street programs, and she has been invited to attend the next SRA meeting to discuss this program with the SRA. He continued that this program includes evaluating many of the things this Board has spoke about regarding how to accomplish making Salem and its downtown a better place to live, work, invest and visit. He added that this program could help the SRA better focus on its CDBG funded projects. Chairman Curran commented that the Board has not seen many loan requests lately. Mr. Reffett responded that many of the potential applicants do not want to meet the requirements attached to these federal funds, such as paying Davis-Bacon wage rates. Mr. Vickers asked how the SRA loan program operates and how it is funded. Ms. Dubinsky briefly explained the origination of the SRA loan program, its loan criteria and its funding sources. Ms. Crain stated that she would provide Mr. Vickers with printed material regarding SRA Loans and a copy of the application form. Other Business • Mr. Reffett informed the Board that this is Mary Crain's last meeting. She is leaving to take a position in Watertown. Mr. Reffett and the Board members expressed their thanks to her for all her hard work and wished her well. There being no further business, Mr. Vickers made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Mr. Connelly seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Meeting stands adjourned. The next regular meeting is scheduled for October 11, 2000. Respectfully submitted, Ellen S. Dubinsky Secretary • r a Salem ITI Redevelopment Authority DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA THURSDAY, AUGUST 31, 2000 3:45 p.m. Roll Call: Paul Durand Donald Giard Chris Greene David Jaquith Fred Johnson Meredith Reed Agenda: 1. Site Visit- Wesley United Methodist Church—North Street—Continuance of Sign Application 2. Dunkin Donuts/Baskin Robbins—282 Derby Street—Awning Application 3. Tabernacle Church— 50 Washington Street—Handicap Elevator Installation/Demo of Garage 4. Grenquist's Ice Cream Emporium—2 Lynde Street—Sign Application/Window Renovation 5. Peabody Essex Museum—Continuation of review of expansion plan esdAdrbAagenda One Salem Green • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 • DRB MINUTES August 31,2000 A meeting of the Design Review Board was held on Thursday, August 31, 2000, at 4:30 p.m. in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green. Those in attendance were: Paul Durand, Don Giard, Fred Johnson and Meredith Reed. Wesley Church Sign Application— Site Visit A site visit was held at the Church to finalize the design of the sign. The sign is a 4' x 4', free standing with a reader board area. The sign will be placed perpendicular to the building. Mr. Giard made a motion to approve the free standing sign with the conditions that the sides extending from the frame be reduced and the thickness of the base be reduced and be colored to match the existing granite on the building, and the sign be set back to align with the drain area on the front lawn. Ms. Reed seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Dunkin Donuts/Baskin Robbins—282 Derby Street—Awning Application Mr. Robert Jackson, storeowner, appeared before the Board with an application for awnings over the windows at 282 Derby Street. The valances will have 10" letters of the store name, alternating between Dunkin Donuts and Baskin Robbins. The awnings will be maroon and the lettering beige/white. Lighting will be installed underneath to light the walkway and sign. Mr. Johnson made a motion to approve the location, lettering and colors, but instead of the awningdesign, a fabric band be used that extends out from the building with fluorescent lighting g , g g g underneath. Awnings can remain over the doorways, and the Board suggested that awning be made a deep as possible. Mr. Giard seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Tabernacle Church—50 Washington Street—Elevator Tower Addition Mr. Ray Portafila, architect, and Mr. Doug Karam, Church member, appeared before the Board with plans to construct an elevator tower on the Federal Street fagade of the building and to demolish a garage which sets on top of cinder blocks to create parking. The existing stones taken from the building will be reused to create the bottom foundation of the elevator entry. The material being used on the upper portion will be lead coated copper designed, as shown on the plans. The awning shown is not part of this proposal, but it will be constructed at a later phase. Mr. Johnson suggested that the stone base be higher. Mr. Portafila stated that this could be done if enough stone can be reclaimed from the building. Mr. Johnson then suggested the side views continue to use the lead coated copper and have a smaller stone base, so more stones can be used in the front. Mr. Johnson made a motion to approve the elevator building as presented with the condition that the stone base on the front use more stone and the side view be continued with the lead coated copper with smaller stone base. Mr. Johnson further moved that the demolition of the garage be • approved. Mr. Giard seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. DRB Minutes August 31, 2000 • Page 2 of 5 Grenquist's Ice Cream Emporium—2 Lynde Street—Sign Application& Window Replacement Mr. Scott Grenquist appeared before the Board with an application to erect a sign above the window front at 2 Lynde Street and to replace the multi pane window with a single pane of glass. The sign will have a dark green border with a light green background and black lettering. Mr. Grenquist has hired an artist to do the lettering. Mr. Johnson expressed his concern that this sign has not been professionally designed and will not be professionally made. Ms. Reed requested that samples of this artist's work be submitted for review. Mr. Durand questioned the use of plywood and asked if it was exterior grade. He informed Mr. Grenquist that typically sign makers use mdo or fiberboard for exterior signs. The board suggested Mr. Grenquist consult a sign professional and resubmit his sign application. Mr. Grenquist then asked the Board for permission to remove the small pane window system and replace it with a large pane of glass. • Mr. Johnson stated that there is not enough information regarding the glass design, specifically the aluminum framing color and design/construction details. The board took no action on this request. Peabody Essex Museum—Expansion Plan Review At this time, Fred Johnson recused himself from discussion and vote on this agenda item. Gallery Facades Michael Kim, project architect, stated that after the last meeting the DRB commented that the light slots between the gallery structures should have more depth to help alleviate the massing concerns. Mr. Kim explained the history and showed design drafts that he and the architectural team studied before arriving at the current fagade design. Many different ideas were investigated such as the use of small windows on the facades, cladding each building with a different material, such as stone, brick, metal and slate. Mr. Giard commented that the gallery shapes are different on the expansion brochure than they are now, and he expressed his opinion that he preferred the brochure design. Mr. Kim responded that the brochure does contain an earlier design drawing. He continued to show the Board various working drawings of prior studied treatments. After all of these options were explored, the final decision was made that the `simple treatment' proposed would best stand the test of • time and best fits in with the material, scale, texture and character of Salem. DRB Minutes August 31, 2000 • Page 3 of 5 At this time a model of the gallery spaces was shown. Mr. Kim stated that this model was constructed to study in depth the light wells and shadows and illumination patterns, so much research has been done to arrive at the final dimensions for the buildings and glazing elements. He continued that at one point the depth was deeper(12")but due to interior requirements, such as the interior wall must be flat, this depth did not technically work to accomplish the requirements for the interior gallery space and the current depth can't be increased. Mr. Giard suggested that instead of moving the glass panel in, the brick surface could be moved out. Mr. Kim responded that this suggestion would result in a severe cost addition to the construction and informed the Board that the total square footage cost is estimated at $100,000 per square foot and the net gallery space cost is estimated at $25,000 per square foot. Mr. Durand commented that there are incremental costs, but square foot numbers are not a real measure. Mr. Giard commented that the design uses both real glazing and shadow box/false windows, and felt that the architects are selectively choosing elements. Mr. Kim responded that due to programmatic needs for the interior of the plan, different glazing needs to be used. • Ms. Reed asked if the skylights could be expanded down to break up the massing. Mr. Kim responded that the goal of the current design accomplishes breaking up the massing without breaking up the mass. Mr. Giard asked if the use of a granite base was investigated. Mr. Kim responded that this was studied, but once again,this simple fagade treatment prevailed. Mr. Giard suggested that another alternative based on a domestic architectural theme of front yards could be used to articulate the transition from public to private space by adding a tiering landscaping feature to better the transition and help alleviate the massing. Ms. Solano responded that because of the height of the building,to add something small would look out of scale and odd. The current landscaping helps pull the pieces nicely together. Mr. Giard continued that something is needed to modulate the space. He stated that he recognized that the building needs to be looked at from an institutional scale perspective but felt that something still needs to be done to break up the massing. Ms. Solano responded that the addition of stoops were studied in a way to respond to the scale of the building, but they actually looked out of scale with the building. She continued that goal of • the public walkway was to have people feel like they are in a garden and not to interact with the building. DRB Minutes August 31, 2000 • Page 4 of 5 Ms. Reed commented that people are desperate to be invited to this building and the current mass is intimidating. Mr. Kim stated that the building is designed to be inviting, from the outside public walkway and through the interior courtyard of the building. Mr. Giard commented that there could be other elements used to help break up the massing other than through the landscaping. Ms. Reed suggested that perhaps some type of architectural optical illusion could be introduced to make people more comfortable with the scale of the building, especially in the winter time, when the trees will be bare. Mr. Kim responded that the buildings are already broken up in sequence, which offers an illusion and is sympathetic and resonant in Salem. Again, he stated that the uncompromising simplicity of the fagade is the best treatment. Mr. Durand stated that he agreed with Mr. Kim's design and treatment of the facades and felt g , they offer a nice backdrop to the public garden. • Essex Street Fagade At this time, Mr. Kim addressed one of the other DRB concerns regarding more glazing on the Essex Street fagade. Mr. Kim pointed out that there are three existing windows along the pedestrian mall and the new plan calls for the addition of three new windows. He continued that the Dodge building is a cast in place concrete building and it is very difficult to cut out more window space. Mr. Giard stated that there are many other alternatives to accomplish the request to add more life to the pedestrian mall and he stated he was disappointed that there have been no changes offered by the architects. He felt that this space is prime frontage and not to create more activity along the street is a wasted opportunity. He suggested that an external storefront could be created. Mr. Grimes stated that the new windows will be placed where the new gift shop will be sited, so there will be a retail presence along the mall. Ms. Reed commented that the new glass entrance will make a huge difference and create much g g activity. Mr. Durand and Ms. Reed commented that they had no problem with the current plan for the Dodge building fagade. • DRB Minutes August 31, 2000 • Page 5 of 5 Interior Courtyard At this time, Mr. Kim showed the plans for the interior courtyard, the south facing vestibule and stairway. Ms. Reed asked when the interior walkway would be closed to the public. Attorney Correnti responded that the MOU states the walkway will remain open for seven years, at the end of which time, discussion will commence regarding whether or not the interior space will continue to be open to the public. Ms. Reed commented that she was concerned with the way the space ends at Charter Street. It seems to be confusing. Mr. Durand commented that the placement of the freight elevator, thereby narrowing the space is concerning. Mr. Grimes explained that currently, in order to use the upper story gallery spaces, the Museum has to remove existing upper story windows and use an exterior crane to move large exhibit items. He continued that although there is a very small percentage of problem items, it has been a high priority programmatic need to move item through the Museum's existing basement • storage up to the upper levels. Mr. Durand commented that people can enter the building easily from Essex Street, move toward the light to exit and then the area narrows and becomes congested. Mr. Durand found this problematic. Ms. Reed agreed that this is awkward. Mr. Durand stated that he felt the elevator is not in the best location from a pedestrian function standpoint. Mr. Kim commented that he has always liked this design, so these comments are surprising, but he stated that he would look at this again with a fresh set of eyes. There being no further business,the meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Ellen S. Dubinsky Secretary i r u Salem Redevelopment Authority DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA THURSDAY, AUGUST 17, 2000 4:30 p.m. Roll Call: Paul Durand Donald Giard Chris Greene • David Jaquith Fred Johnson Meredith Reed Agenda: 1. Higginson Block Realty Trust— 14 Derby Square - Continuance of Window Addition 2. Wesley United Methodist Church—North Street—Continuance of Sign Application 3. Peabody Essex Museum—Continuation of review of expansion plan esd\drb\agenda - One Salem Green • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 • DRB MEETING MINUTES August 17, 2000 A meeting of the Design Review Board was held on Thursday, August 17, 2000, at 4:30 p.m. in the second floor conference at One Salem Green. DRB members in attendance were Paul Durand, David Jaquith, Fred Johnson and Don Giard. Staff Assistant Mary Crain was also present. Hininson Block— 14 Derby Square—Window& Door Installation Mr. Leland Hussey, general contractor, and Ms. Carol Weyland appeared before the Board with revisions to their plan to construct a French door system and round windows on the top floor of the Higginson Block. Mr. Hussey explained that per the DRB's recommendation, they have changed the detail above the doors to imitate the pattern that appears in existing windows. The transom light has been removed. He continued to explain the divided light detail in the round windows and French doors. He also noted that the Daniel Low's building has a round window. Mr. Johnson asked how the doors would lock, as there is no proposal in front of the Board to construct a rooftop deck. Mr. Hussey responded that the doors would be mechanically fastened. Mr. Giard made a motion to accept the plans as presented. Mr. Johnson seconded the motion, all • were in favor, motion so carried. Wesley Church—North Street— Sign Application Reverend Kenneth Steigler, Chairman of the Board of Trustees Ted Larson, and Wm. Curtis Sidener, parishioner, appeared before the DRB with revised drawings of their proposed freestanding sign. Rev. Steigler noted that the existing sign does illuminate and electrical work has just been completed to make the illumination operable. The proposed sign has been reduced to a 4' x 6', its top curved element has been removed, the Church name has been shortened, the cabinet color has changed to maroon, and letter sizes have been submitted. Mr. Durand asked the dimensions of the existing sign. Rev. Steigler responded that the sign 4' x 7'. Mr. Durand commented that the existing sign is more historically appropriate than the one being proposed. Mr. Jaquith informed the applicants that he sympathized with their need to communicate information to the public, but felt this sign was inappropriate in this area. It appears to be a sign constructed for a highway business. Mr. Giard suggested that the applicants investigate using two smaller wooden signs. • • Mr. Johnson commented that a sign in this location should reflect a sign that is more relative to the building's time period. He felt that the sign proposed would damage the appearance of the Church. The sign needs to relate to the Romanesque architecture of the building. Mr. Johnson suggested that the Church contact a local sign design company. Ms. Dubinsky stated that she would provide the applicants local companies that have submitted applications for local Church signs. The Board scheduled a site visit to the property for August 315`, at 4:00 p.m. Peabody Essex Museum—Expansion Plan—Massin¢Discussion Let the record show that Fred Johnson recused himself from discussion and vote on this agenda item. Let the record show that Meredith Reed joined the meeting at this time. Attorney Joe Correnti addressed the Board explaining that this meeting will focus on the new building additions and massing issues. Mr. Michael Kim, architect from Moshe Safdie and Associates, explained the history and • program requirements of this expansion. He stated that the firm of Moshe Safdie has been working on this project for four years. They first participated in a charette with four other national firms and were ultimately awarded the design contract. The first priority was to increase the Museum's ability to show their works. This plan accomplishes that by doubling the Museum's gallery space. Another priority was to improve the orientation within the Museum and within downtown Salem. Mr. Kim showed the Board a series of photographs that showed traditional gallery space and also photographs of early Salem where the idea to create a Victorian City scape with gable roof buildings with light in between the structures originated from. He continued that the north elevation entrance is the same scale as East India Marine Hall with the Dodge Building in between, creating a bookend type effect. Mr. Kim commented that the Chinese house was a siting challenge, but he explained the background that led to the final siting decision. Mr. Kim also explained the philosophy of the public orientation spaces such as Armory Park and the spine/courtyard entrance and access. He stated that the interior courtyard, which will be open to the public in accordance with the MOU, at least for a few years,has been slightly curved so light from the south end can be seen from the north entrance. In order to make the north entrance inviting to the public, the fagade is comprised completely of glazing. At this time, Mr. Kim • showed the interior floor plan of the building,pointing out the 5' different elevation from the • north to the south entrance. The south entrance will have steps and an elevator will be installed to make this area fully accessible. Mr. Kim began to speak about the materials chosen to construct the expansion elements. He stated that museums are usually built with stone,but after considering the building elements in Salem and considering the scale of the building, the materials will be a masonry finish brick and sandstone. The bricks have a raspberry flash,which was popular in a 19`h Century building. The color is a result of being fired in a wood kiln. The bricks being proposed have been found in England. Also, indicative of the time period, the brick bands will be close together with 1/8"— 1/4" separation. Mr. Kim informed the Board that a stone material similar to Brownstone was sought, and the sandstone presented was from India. He stated this sandstone has a different chemical composition than what is typical so it will not deteriorate. A 2'8"vertical module is being proposed to break up the massing. A granite sample was shown to the Board. This granite closely matches East India Marine Hall and is an exact match to the Dodge Wing building. The granite will be used on the new wall of the entry area and also for the infill of the Dodge building. All the roofs will be constructed of lead coated copper and the cornices and copings will be done in stone. The glass will be transparent and non-reflective, in some areas a very slight gray tint will be used. Mr. Durand asked what color the mullions would be. Mr. Kim responded that the mullions would be medium gray to pick-up the lead covered copper. Mr. Jaquith stated that the shapes of the houses/roofs appear to be arbitrary and requested that Mr. Kim speak to this point. • Mr. Kim responded that the interior configuration contributes to the exterior. He stated that after several forms and designs were tried,that the present elementary forms gave the most character and flexibility to the buildings. Mr. Giard asked how the forms were supported. Mr. Kim responded that buttress supports will be used. Mr. Jaquith asked Mr. Kim to speak to the alignment of the east facades. Mr. Kim responded that after much study it was determined that the calmness portrayed by the alignment was better and the buildings didn't have to call attention to themselves; there was no reason to skew the alignment or add extra features. Mr. Kim also added that the buildings are linear because of the nature of the public walkway. Mr. Giard asked the architect to explore using other elements to break up the massing. Mr. Kim reiterated that many different brick, material and design elements were studied and it was determined that `calmer was better' and too many different elements diluted the integrity of the wall. He stated this addition has been designed to be a contemporary building. Mr. Durand asked what the depth of the glass elements was from the brick facades. Mr. Kim responded that the glass is recessed approximately 1' from the brick. • • Mr. Jaquith commented that his most important issue is the scale problem in the park. He felt that the shapes needed to be more human scale. The 52' proposed building as it relates to the houses on Charter Street appears as a very large building next to small houses. Mr. Jaquith requested that interior plans be provided. Mr. Giard commented that the Essex Street Mall is a retail street and he is concerned with the lack of activity that would occur with the new addition on Essex Street and the in fill of the Dodge building. He suggested this be mitigated by increasing glazing along this fagade to enhance the pedestrian experience and create opportunities for display space. Mr. Kim pointed out that there are three large openings on the new fagade. Two of the windows will be the storefront of the retail gift shop and the other window is positioned to be where school groups will be meeting, so these windows will show a lot of activity. Also, the existing windows in the Dodge Building will have displays behind them. Mr. Giard commented that the Museum occupies prime frontage on a retail street and felt it would be a wasted opportunity if more glazing and openings were not added to view giftshop items or displays of Museum events/exhibitions. Mr. Durand agreed with Mr. Giard's comments regarding more glazed areas along this fagade. • Mr. Kim responded that he would investigate the use of more glazing. Mr. Giard commented regarding the interior walkway configuration. He felt that there was a flow problem that visually traps you in the building. Mr. Kim responded that he felt it was difficult to end the walkway in stairs. Mr. Durand questioned the proposal to use such small mortar joints in the brick fagade. Mr. Kim stated that this veneer will be demanding, but it can be done. He stated that a sample panel has been successfully completed. Mr. Jaquith again commented that the walls of the gallery houses can be improved, something needs to be done to have a more human scale and that another level of thought needs to put into this facade. Ms. Laura Solano, landscape architect,pointed out that you will really never see this elevation straight on, you will see it on the oblique long angle. She continued that the layering up of the vegetation in that area helps with scale and that the structure of the trees, their branches and shadows will add a level of detail to the wall that will help with the scale. Ms. Reed asked if the sandstone and bricks would be flush. Mr. Kim responded in the affirmative. • • At this time Ms. Solano referenced page SA.14 of the submitted plan that depicted the trees along the new buildings. Ms. Reed asked if the trees are deciduous. Ms. Solano replied that there are some evergreen, but the trees are primarily deciduous. Mr. Durand commented that he liked the cadence/staccato effect of the design. He agreed that the landscaping treats the scale issue and felt that if other elements were added it could lose this effect. Mr. Giard expressed his concern with the scale issues on this fagade. He agreed with Mr. Jaquith that some additional thought needs to be put into these facades. Ms. Reed suggested recessing the glazed areas between the houses another 1'. Mr. Durand agreed with this suggestion. Ms. Crain commented that the plan's notes it refers to the landscaping at maturity. She asked what size the trees would be when they are first planted. Ms. Solano responded that large caliper trees will be used, some of which have already been procured. The trees when planted will be between 20' and 30' and within a 3-5 year time period you will see significant growth. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. • Respectfully submitted, Ellen S. Dubinsky Secretary • o Salem Redevelopment Authority DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA THURSDAY, AUGUST 3, 2000 4:30 p.m. Roll Call: Paul Durand Donald Giard Chris Greene • David Jaquith Fred Johnson Meredith Reed Agenda: 1. Dunkin Donuts—Washington Street—Tree Removal 2. Higginson Block Realty Trust— 14 Derby Square - Window addition&paint colors 3. Peabody Essex Museum—Continuation of review of expansion plan .s&d,b\agenda • One Salem Green • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 • DRB MINUTES August 3, 2000 The Design Review Board met in open session on Thursday, August 3, 2000 at 4:30 p.m. in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green. Those in attendance were: Don Giard, Chris Greene and Fred Johnson. Staff Assistant Mary Crain was also present. Dunkin Donuts—Riley Plaza—Tree Removal Mr. Robert Jackson appeared before the Board with a letter and photographs of a diseased tree that is on his property and asked permission to remove the tree, as it is a safety hazard. After reviewing the photographs, Mr. Greene concurred that the tree is sparsely foliated and probably sick. Mr. Jackson stated that he would landscape the plant bed where the tree is being removed. Mr. Greene stated that the Norman street wall needs t be vegetated to mitigate the impacts of the wall. He suggested three trees could be planted along the planting strip. They should be shade trees, not Maple. He suggested a Honey Locust of 2-'/z caliper. Mr. Jackson stated he would return with a landscaping plan for the planting area. • Mr. Greene made a motion to allow the removal of the tree. Mr. Johnson seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Higginson Square—Round Window Installation and Paint Colors Mr. Leland Hussey and Michael Blier presented plans for three round windows and a set of French doors for the fourth floor of the Higginson Block. (A deck was drawn on the elevation, but this proposed element was not under consideration at this meeting.) Mr. Jaquith asked why round windows were selected. Mr. Blier responded that he chose them to add interest to the building. Mr. Johnson expressed his concern that the proposed doors do not meet with the vocabulary of the building and they should puncture the building in the same way the windows do. The doors should also be moved in and not be so close to the edge of the building. Mr. Blier stated that he will redesign the doorway. Mr. Greene added that the top of the arch be the same height as the existing windows. Mr. Blier then should paint colors for the building. The frames will be cushing green,the sashes blackberry, the door rosy apple and the cornice will be green. • Mr. Greene made a motion to approve the paint colors. Mr. Johnson seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Peabody Essex Museum—Demolition Re uest Fred Johnson recused himself from discussion and vote on this agenda item. Attorney Correnti explained that this meeting would focus on the rear portion demolition and the relocation of 10 Liberty Street and 42 Charter Street to two newly created lots on Charter Street. He continued that the Peabody Essex Museum has made a commitment to save and preserve these structures. Mr. Correnti also informed the Board that the demolition of the Empire Building would also be discussed. In order to accommodate the public walkway, which will be open 24 hours, seven days a week, year round,the Empire Building must be demolished. He stated that the Peabody Essex Museum has made a commitment to the Mayor and to the City to build this walkway. Ms. Solano, project landscape architect, began her presentation by showing photographs of the front elevations of the existing buildings. She then showed a plan of the houses sited at their new location. The granite bollards and steel fence will also be moved. She pointed out that due to grading issues there will be a retaining wall constructed that starts at 2 feet and grades down to 6 inches. She continued to explain the grading in detail. She stated that there would be a wood fence on top of the stone retaining wall. Mr. Greene asked that the fence design be shown at the • next meeting. Mr. Greene asked why the buildings were not brought right up to the sidewalk as they are in their current location. Ms. Solano responded that they are brought to the property line. Mr. Utne added that the second floors have a projecting bay. Mr. Greene responded that it is a benefit for the occupant not to be directly on the sidewalk, but he wanted the fences and the facades to align. Ms. Solano went on to point out the different types of vegetation that will used around the houses. Specifically, small shrubs, ground cover, bulbs, grass, and Red Maple or London Plane trees. There is also a possibility that trees used in the public areas could be used. Mr. Jaquith had some concern regarding the fence design. Mr. Giard suggested that the fence move toward the parking lot to give the perception of a side yard and the bricks be brought up to that point. Ms. Solano felt that this suggestion would result in a look that would have too much pavement. Ms. Crain asked where the one-story schoolhouse will be relocated. Mr. Utne showed on the plan that this building will move across Charter Street and put on a block foundation, as future plans call for the building to move again to the Essex Institute grounds. Mr. Greene stated that this relocation be approved as a temporary location and when the building is moved the garden be restored. • • Mr. Greene asked what will happen after the demolition of the Empire building. Mr. Phippen responded that once the Empire building in down, a wooden fence will be constructed and a temporary walkway will be established to maintain public access while the building expansion is under construction. The Board concurred that the proposed expansion plan qualifies as an acceptable reuse plan to allow demolition. Mr. Greene made a motion to allow: the rear portion demolition and the moving of the two homes on 42 Charter Street and 10 Liberty Street to the proposed Charter Street location as shown on plan dated 12 May 2000; the moving of the one story schoolhouse to a new, temporary Charter Street location, as shown on plan dated 12 May 2000 with the condition that the garden be reestablished after the school house is moved; and the demolition of the Empire Building (133 Essex Street) to accommodate a public walkway that mitigates the impact of the Liberty Street closure. Although review of the site plan for the two relocated houses was favorable, final approval of details, site design and landscaping will be recommended at a later date. Design/landscaping details of the construction of the temporary and permanent walkways will be reviewed in detail and a final recommendation will be submitted to the SRA at a later date. Mr. Giard seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. At this time, Ms. Solano responded to comments expressed at the previous meeting. • She stated that Board had a concern regarding the character of the stone wall proposed for the Esplanade. She showed a photograph of the pattern for the stone. She felt that this example shows that this wall and the Tercentenary Memorial stones are dissimilar. The new stones will be a little bit grayer than the example and they will be dry laid. The Board concurred with the choice of stone. Ms. Solano showed the Board a photograph of the Chelmsford granite benches that will be used along the esplanade. The Board concurred with the choice of benches. Ms. Solano showed brick samples of the esplanade and street brick that has been selected. She stated the brick is complimentary to the existing City brick. Mr. Giard expressed that the bricks, cobblestones, curbing, etc. that is on a public way should adhere to the City standards. Mr. Greene stated that the complimentary brick could be used in the esplanade, but he agreed that the City standard brick be used on the public way. He felt that the public should not think that they are walking on private property. He suggested that the City brick could be patterned differently or other identifying elements could be used. He also stated that if the public way is • • all bricked it could be dangerous, since a pedestrian could assume that the area is all sidewalk. He went on to state that the street edge needs to be better defined. Mr. Giard asked if different patterns of brick are being used. Ms. Solano responded that the roadway has a running bond pattern and the crosswalks have a herringbone on end pattern, although these details are not finalized. At this time, Mr. Phippen explained the commemorative function of the park and explained the commemorative pieces that are incorporated into the park, such as the arch, bell, timeline, and Second Corps Cadets stone. He informed the Board that at the last meeting some issues were raised regarding the Esplanade and Armory Park that have not been addressed at this time. He stated the design team is still reviewing the Board's concerns. Mr. Greene reiterated his comments and concerns as follows: -Concern that entrances to esplanade and Armory Park are not aligned. -Commented that Armory Park is visually uninteresting and the current alignment of the paths creates four small lawns, and he would like to see larger lawn spaces. -Suggested that the grass areas along the esplanade between the paths be raised -Concern that the partial recreation of the Armory Headhouse facade blocks the views of the Plummer Hall and Phillips Library buildings. He continued that a design that echoes a previous building's footprint and not necessary successful. He felt the plaza should showcase the other • Museum buildings, and the current plan does not accomplish this. -Stated that the park design should move people as little out of the way as possible and this plan does not reflect that. He felt the pathways not be so straight, especially since this is a small space. -Stated that the esplanade and park need to feel like they are connected and should be designed in the same vocabulary. There being no furtlier business, the meeting was adjourned at this time. The next meeting will be held on August 17, 2000. Respectfully submitted, Ellen S. Dubinsky Secretary • r e Salem LLI Redevelopment t. Authority DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA THURSDAY, JULY 20, 2000 4:30 p.m. One Salem Green Conference Room Roll Call: Paul Durand • Donald Giard Chris Greene David Jaquith Fred Johnson Meredith Reed Agenda: 1. Wesley Methodist Church—North Street— Sign Application 2. MarketPlace—Tree Removal Request 3. Army Barracks—234 Essex Street—Awning Logo Review 4. Peabody Essex Museum—Expansion Plans—Project Overview 5. Peabody Block— Site Visit—Paint Colors &Vent System esd\drb\agenda One Salem Green • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 9 (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 . Design Review Board Minutes of the Meeting July 20, 2000 The Design Review Board met in open session on Thursday, July 20, 2000 at 4:30 p.m. in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green. Those in attendance were: Paul Durand, Don Giard, Fred Johnson, and Meredith Reed. Staff Assistant Mary Crain was also present. Wesley United Methodist Church— 8 North Street— Sign Application Reverend Kenneth Steigler appeared before the DRB with an application to replace the existing freestanding sign with a new freestanding sign perpendicular to the building. The proposed sign is 4' x 8'. It has a beige aluminum cabinet with the church name;the other churches using the facilities along the pole portion of the cabinet, and a reader board with various activities and times. The sign has lexan face and is internally illuminated. Ms. Dubinsky explained to the Board that freestanding signs are not allowed in the Urban Renewal Area. However, it has been the policy of the SRA to allow these signs at Church locations so their buildings would not be defaced by signs. Ms. Dubinsky commented that North Street is an Entrance Corridor Overlay District, which only allows reader boards in certain cases. However, since churches normally post their service times, this use can be allowed. The Board felt that the sign was too large and suggested the sign area be reduced to 4' x 6'. Mr. Johnson suggested that the top decorative curve be removed from the sign. Ms. Reed suggested that a different color for the box be chosen. She suggested black. Ms. Reed also suggested that the title on the top be made shorter, but also larger. She suggested that the words `United Methodist' be removed and the words "Wesley Church" and the logo remain. Mr. Durand asked that color samples be submitted. He also requested that the sizes of each letter be submitted. Mr. Johnson suggested that the Board do a site visit. The Board agreed. Army Barracks—Washineton Street - Logo Submission Ms. Dubinsky showed the Board a copy of the proposed army man logo for the awnings at Army Barracks. Mr. Durand made a motion to deny the use of the logo. Mr. Giard seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Chris Greene entered the meeting at this time. • DRB Minutes July 20, 2000 • Page 2 of 5 Marketplace—Tree Removal Ms. Dubinsky read a letter into the record from the Market and Tourist Commission requesting that a mulberry tree at the Marketplace across from the Lobster Shanty be removed, as its berries are causing a safety hazard for pedestrians and discoloring the sidewalk. The Board was not opposed to the removal of the tree, but requested that the Market Commission provide the DRB with the size and species of a replacement tree. Mr. Greene added that a Norway Maple should not be considered as an alternative tree. t Peabody Essex Museum—Expansion Plan At this time Mr. Fred Johnson recused himself from discussion and vote on this agenda item and removed himself from the table. Attorney Joseph Correnti, representing the Museum, addressed the Board. He explained that at the last SRA meeting, the Board voted to send this expansion plan to DRB. He continued that • concurrently, this plan is going through the public hearing process at the Planning Board. He stated that today the Board would hear an overview of this major expansion project. He introduced the following participants who will be involved with the expansion project: Will Phippen, John Grimes and Tor Utne from the Peabody Essex Museum; Michael Kim from Moshe Safdie Architects; Bill Wright from Turner Construction; Tom Houston from CID and Laura Solano from Michael Van Volkenburg's office. Mr. Will Phippen addressed the Board and outlined the Museum's goals that are part of this expansion plan. He stated that a facilities analysis was completed and resulted in three programmatic areas that needed major changes. The first being that more room is need to exhibit collections. Secondly, more and different visitors need to be attracted which will be accomplished by new educational programs and spaces and also by the new arrival of the Yin Yan Tang house. Visitor orientation is also included in this goal which is addressed in the creation of the inside atrium/arcade and outside by the creation of a point of arrival, which will be Armory Park. Thirdly,the need for better visitor amenities must be accomplished. This has been incorporated into the expansion plan which creates better retail space, community space, a new information area, and more and different food options. The new arcade provides many use options in a climate controlled, secured, lighted area. At this time, Ms. Laura Solano, project landscape architect, addressed the Board. She stated that she has tried to create landscaping to positively add to the Cityscape. Armory Square has been created as a place of orientation and the public walkway was created to move pedestrians • through to Charter Street. She explained that the public garden/esplanade/walkway is oriented North to South with an opening of 16' and narrowing to approximately 8' at Charter Street with bluestone and fieldstone paving materials. The area will contain benches, grassy areas and many different species of trees. The side of the walkway bounded by the former Empire building will have a band of many different varieties of shrubs & trees and a low stone wall. DRB Minutes July 20, 2000 • Page 3 of 5 Mr. Greene commented that there are a number of nice things going on in the Esplanade, e.g. grass and stone paved area, afternoon shading. The design has a nice unity. He asked why the walkway narrows from 16' to 8'. Ms. Solano responded that there are paths off the main pathway to exit; however the narrowing perspective was used to modulate the space and give it a more human scale. Mr. Greene expressed his concern with the 8' width, since a lot of people at one time, such as a bus tour, would be entering or exiting from this space, and he felt the wider width should be maintained. Mr. Solano responded that there are other releases provided through the blue stone to handle larger crowds of people. Mr. Greene expressed his concern that the lawn and pathways on the side bounded by the Museum are the same height. He felt the lawns should be elevated above the paths, so the lawns wouldn't be used for heavy volumes of circulation and also the raising of the lawn would provide for a more formal space. • Ms. Solano responded that raising the lawn would be inappropriate because it would result in the separation of the space. She continued that soil scientists have been studying what type of soil would be most resilient to foot traffic and an irrigation system is being proposed to help with the maintenance of the lawn area. She also stated that the use of brick cross bands and the randomness of the tree arrangement subtly imply the space is not for heavy foot traffic, but she stated she would consider Mr. Greene's comments. Mr. Greene expressed his concern with the fieldstone wall being proposed, as it is so close to the Tercentenary Memorial, which has fieldstone. He thought that fieldstone might not be the best material to use. Ms. Solano responded that she shared Mr. Greene's concern not to replicate the fieldstone wall and what has been chosen is different. Mr. Greene asked see a photograph of what Ms. Solano is envisioning the wall to look like. Mr. Greene asked how the public walkway path meets Armory Square. Ms. Solano showed on the plan where the walkway's handicap curb and the entrance to Armory Square were located. Mr. Greene asked what type of paving would be used. Ms. Solano responded that a brick complimentary to those existing on Essex Street would be used with granite curbing. Mr. Giard commented that he felt it was very important that any of the public right of ways use City standard paving material, especially to show consistency and that Essex Street continues. Ms. Solano commented that this is a reasonable instinct, but the bricks that are being proposed • are very complimentary. Ms. Reed asked if the pedestrian mall was open to thru traffic at any point in time how would this affect the current design. DRB Minutes July 20, 2000 • Page 4 of 5 Ms. Solano responded that this proposed design does not preclude the City the ability to open up Essex Street to vehicular traffic. Ms. Reed commented that the walkway appeared to be very linear and monolithic looking. Ms. Solano responded that the landscaping was designed to represent the fabric of the City. Mr. Greene asked if the review of Armory Park could be moved up on the agenda. He felt that a great opportunity has been missed relating to the design of this Square. He stated that it looked as if the park and the walkway were designed at two different times by two different people and he had many aesthetic concerns regarding the design. He also stated that there were many functional concerns, which were problematic in the designs, such as the park entrance not aligning with the walkway path and the handicap ramps being offset. These two entrances should line up. He felt that the park and the walkway will read as two different spaces and does not meet the goal of the Museum to tie the campus together. He commented that the tree selection was good and imaginative, but the park design was too diagrammatic, too simple, and he felt as if it is not done yet. Mr. Giard commented that he perceived the esplanade as a dead zone and the design prohibits visual contact with he outside world, and he felt that more visibility and safety to added to the area. • Ms. Solano responded that this is a valid concern, however the tree selected are very high canopy trees and there have been photometry studies which result in a very good lighting system along the walkway. The next topic of discussion was the moving of the three houses, which currently sit on the site that will be used to construct the new gallery space. Two of the houses will be moved further down Charter Street toward the Salem Housing Authority building. The rear potions of these buildings are scheduled for demolition. The third house will be moved across the street. This move will be temporary, as there are future plans to move this house to the Essex Institute property. Mr. Greene asked what would be the function of the two houses. Mr. Phippen responded that they would be used for Museum office space and/or residential space. Mr. Greene and Mr. Durand agreed that they liked the siting and general design that has been presented in the plan. Mr. Durand expressed his concern regarding the wall along the esplanade. He felt that this could be a safety issue, since people could hide behind the wall. He went on to state that in general he liked the landscaped spaces, but agreed that entrance to Armory Square should be pulled back to see Plummer Hall and the other Museum properties. He also commented that the handicap ramp • configuration from the esplanade to Armory Park is unusual and strange. Lastly, Mr. Durand commented that he liked the cadence and the set-up of the gallery buildings. Mr. Greene asked when the architects would be able to respond to the DRB comments and recommendations. DRB Minutes July 20, 2000 . Page 5 of 5 Attorney Correnti replied that the issues raised today will be responded to at the next scheduled meeting. Peabody Block—Site Visit At this time, the Board met at the site of the Peabody Block to review paint colors for the Peabody Building and an exterior vent for the Taste of Thyme restaurant. Mr. Ken Rothwell explained to the Board that the building owner will not allow the applicant to use interior space for the proposed vent and the City inspector would not allow the use of a mushroom cap system. Therefore, the only alternative left is to place a 14" diameter exhaust fan up the brick wall of the rear of the Peabody building to the roof. Mr. Rothwell stated that he will paint the exhaust fan to match the brick color. The Board approved the installation of the vent and that it be painted to match the brick with a dull finish. At this time,the Board returned to the Washington Street fagade of the Peabody Building to discuss painting schemes for the three businesses. • The Irish Pub showed a maroon, black and gold color combination(colors were painted on the storefront for review). The Taste of Thyme Cafe showed several different shades of cream and thyme colors. The Board approved the color scheme for the Irish Pub, selecting the darker more maroon color choice with the black and gold trim. The Board approved a different color palette for the Taste of Thyme. Specifically, the use of Silver Aspen be used as the exterior trim around the window and molding edge around the panels be Moonshadow. At this time,the Board reviewed paint sample catalogs for color combinations at Castle Pizza, which did not have sample colors on their storefront, the beige shade for the Taste of Thyme and a shade of blue were selected and approved by the DRB. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Ellen S. Dubinsky Secretary • i v Lq Salem Redevelopment Authority DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA THURSDAY, JULY 6, 2000 ti)3oQ,n. Roll Call: Paul Durand Donald Giard Chris Greene David Jaquith Fred Johnson • Meredith Reed Agenda: 1. Army Barracks—234 Essex Street—Awning Application 2. Century 21 Real Estate—60 Washington Street—Awning Application 3. Bangkok Paradise—90 Washington Street—Awning Application 4. Century Bank—37 Central Street— Sign Application 5. Lobster Shanty—25 Front Street—Erection of Satellite Dish 6. Sovereign Bank—253 Essex Street— Sign Application 7. Kalifornia Caf6—24 New Derby Street—Sign Application& Cafe Permit esdAdrbAagenda • One Salem Green • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 Design Review Board • Minutes of the Meeting July 6, 2000 The Design Review Board met in open session on Thursday, July 6, 2000 at 4:30 p.m. in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green. Those in attendance were: Paul Durand, Don Giard and David Jaquith. Staff Assistant Mary Crain was also present. Sovereign Bank—253 Essex Street— Sign Application Mr. Brian Brinkers, sign maker, appeared before the DRB with an application to reface all the Fleet signs with Sovereign Bank and its new logo. The main fagade sign would be wood carved. The parking entrance sign would be aluminum with vinyl letters and the rear sign would be lexan with vinyl letters. Other miscellaneous signs were submitted such as parking,handicap and traffic control signs. Mr. Durand made a motion to approve the signs as submitted with the condition that the signs are compliant with ADA regulations and the Mass. Building Code, and that the rear illuminated sign not be lit after 10:00 p.m. Mr. Giard seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Army Barracks—234 Essex Street—Awning Application • Ms. Holly Drewry appeared before the Board with an application to erect three awnings on the Washington Street storefront to match the previously approved awnings on the Essex Street fagade. The applicant also requested permission to place an army man logo on the side of the awning at each end. Mr. Jaquith made a motion to approve the awning with the store name to be placed on the first and third awning. The Board required that the side logo be submitted for approval. Century 21 Real Estate—60 Washington Street—Awning Violation Ms. Dubinsky reported that a Notice of Violation letter was sent to Century 21 on June 5, 2000. An application was submitted and a confirmation letter to attend DRB meeting was sent on June 21, 2000. The applicant was not present at the July 6, 2000 meeting. The DRB instructed staff to notify the applicant that his attendance is required at the next regularly scheduled DRB meeting. Bangkok Paradise—90 Washington Street—Awning Violation Ms. Dubinsky reported that a Notice of Violation letter was sent to Bangkok Paradise on June 5, 2000. • Ms. Mary Wanapha appeared before the Board to request approval for the existing awnings. • Mr. Giard made a motion that the two awnings be allowed to remain with the condition that the yellow awning is lowered to match the height of the blue awning. Mr. Jaquith seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Century Bank - 37 Central Street—Sign Violation Ms. Dubinsky reported that a Notice of Violation letter was sent to Century Bank on June 5, 2000. Mr. Robert Covino from Sign Salem Inc. presented an application for approval of face changes to Century bank signs. The new signs have a red background and white lettering. There are two building signs and two directional signs. He also requested approval for the vinyl-applied strips to the windows, as shown in the photographs. Mr. Jaquith made a motion to approve the application as presented. Mr. Durand seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Lobster Shanty—25 Front Street—TV Dish Antenna Mr. William Kelley, owner of the Lobster Shanty appeared before the DRB to request approval to remove an existing roof antenna and install a TV Dish. The dish is 18" in diameter and would be placed on an extension pole attached to the roof on the north side of the building. The • antenna would be 2' —3' above the roof line. Mr. Kelley also informed the Board that he understands that he has to apply for an outdoor cafe permit, and will make application at a latter date. Mr. Jaquith requested that a site visit take place before an approval is granted. A site visit was scheduled for Friday, July 7, at 11:30 a.m. Result of site visit: Approve application to erect a free standing pole in the rear of the structure in a position that is the least visible with a height not to exceed 10 feet. Pole location and height will be confirmed with SRA staff when satellite company tests signal clearances. Kalifornia Cafe—24 New Derby Street— Sign& Cafe Application Mr. Scott Leahy appeared before the Board with an application to erect a 4' diameter, round sign on the New Derby street side of his building. Mr. Leahy informed the Board that the sign has been erected, and requested it be allowed to remain. As shown in the drawing, the K is 11", the lower case letters are 5", and the word Cafe is 4". Mr. Leahy explained that he has also seeking approval for his outside seating. Ms. Dubinsky informed the Board that the Market& Tourist Commission also has jurisdiction in this area, and they requested that the DRB be made aware of their concern for public access • along the walkway. • At this time, Mr. Jaquith requested a site visit before any action takes place. The site visit is scheduled for Friday July 7. Results ofsite visit: The Board allowed the sign to remain. The DRB recommended that the latticework barriers be removed and the existing planter/rope scheme be continued The Board also recommended that because of the distance between the edge of the cafe and the market stall across the way, the boundary be set at an angle so the tables can be rearranged further down the wall of the Market restroom building and the walkway could be opened up. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Ellen S. Dubinsky Secretary • • r Salem Redevelopment Authority DRB RECOMMENDATIONS July 6, 2000 Meeting Sovereign Bank—253 Essex Street—Sign Application Mr. Brian Brinkers, sign maker, appeared before the DRB with an application to reface all the Fleet signs with Sovereign Bank and its new logo. The main fagade sign would be wood carved. The parking entrance sign would be aluminum with vinyl letters and the rear sign would be lexan with vinyl letters. Other miscellaneous signs were submitted such as parking, handicap and traffic control signs. • DRB RECOMMENDATION: The DRB approved the signs as submitted with the condition that the signs are compliant with ADA regulations and the Mass. Building Code, and that the rear illuminated sign not be lit after 10:00 p.m. Army Barracks—234 Essex Street—Awning Application Ms. Holly Drewry appeared before the Board with an application to erect three awnings on the Washington Street storefront to match the previously approved awnings on the Essex Street fagade. The applicant also requested permission to place an army man logo on the side of the awning at each end. DRB RECOMMENDATION: The DRB approved the awning with the store name to be placed on the first and third awning. The Board required that the side logo be submitted for approval. Century 21 Real Estate—60 Washington Street—Awning Violation SRA staff reported that a Notice of Violation letter was sent to Century 21 on June 5, 2000. An application was returned and a confirmation letter to attend DRB meeting was sent on June 21, 2000. The applicant was not present at the July 6, 2000 meeting. • One Salem Green • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 G DRB RECOMMENDATION: No action was taken on the application. The DRB • instructed staff to notify the applicant that his attendance is required at the next regularly scheduled DRB meeting. Bangkok Paradise—90 Washington Street—Awning Violation SRA staff reported that a Notice of Violation letter was sent to Bangkok Paradise on June 5, 2000. Ms. Mary Wanapha appeared before the Board to request approval for the existing awnings. DRB RECOMMENDATION: DRB recommended that the two awnings be allowed to remain with the condition that the yellow awning is lowered to match the height of the blue awning. Century Bank - 37 Central Street— Sign Violation SRA staff reported that a Notice of Violation letter was sent to Century Bank on June 5, 2000. Mr. Robert Covino from Sign Salem Inc., presented an application for approval of face changes to Century bank signs that have a red background and white lettering. There are two building signs and two directional signs. He also requested approval for the vinyl-applied strips to the windows, as shown in the photographs. DRB RECOMMENDATION: Approve as presented. • Lobster Shanty—25 Front Street—TV Dish Antenna Mr. William Kelley, owner of the Lobster Shanty has requested approval to remove an existing roof antenna and install a TV Dish. The dish is 18" in diameter and would be placed on an extension pole attached to the north side of the building. Mr. Kelley also informed the Board that he understands that he has to apply for an outdoor cafe permit, and will make application at a latter date. DRB RECOMMENDATION: Requested a site visit. Result of site visit: Approve application to erect a free standing pole in the rear of the structure in a position that is the least visible with a height not to exceed 10 feet. Pole location and height will be confirmed with SRA staff when satellite company tests signal clearances. Kalifornia Cafe—24 New Derby Street—Sign& Cafe Application Mr. Scott Leahy appeared before the Board with an application to erect a 4' diameter, round sign on the New Derby street side of his building. Mr. Leahy informed the Board that the sign has been erected, and requested it be allowed to remain. Mr. Leahy explained that he has also • seeking approval for his outside seating. SRA staff informed the Board that the Market& Tourist Commission also has jurisdiction in this area, and they requested that the DRB be made aware of their concern for public access along the walkway. DRB RECOMMENDATION: Requested a site visit. Results of site visit: The Board allowed the sign to remain. They recommended that the lattice work barriers be removed and the existing planter/rope scheme be continued. The Board also recommended that because of the distance between the edge of the cafe and the market stall across the way, the boundary be set at an angle so the tables can be rearranged further down the wall of the Market restroom building and the walkway could be opened up. • • r� Salem ® Redevelopment Authority - - - DRB RECOMMENDATIONS July 6, 2000 Meeting Sovereign Bank—253 Essex Street— Sign Application Mr. Brian Brinkers, sign maker, appeared before the DRB with an application to reface all the Fleet signs with Sovereign Bank and its new logo. The main fagade sign would be wood carved. The parking entrance sign would be aluminum with vinyl letters and the rear sign would be lexan with vinyl letters. Other miscellaneous signs were submitted such as parking,handicap and traffic control signs. DRB RECOMMENDATION: The DRB approved the signs as submitted with the condition that the signs are compliant with ADA • regulations and the Mass. Building Code, and that the rear illuminated sign not be lit after 10:00 p.m. AM Barracks—234 Essex Street—Awning Application Ms. Holly Drewry appeared before the Board with an application to erect three awnings on the Washington Street storefront to match the previously approved awnings on the Essex Street fagade. The applicant also requested permission to place an army man logo on the side of the awning at each end. DRB RECOMMENDATION: The DRB approved the awning with the store name to be placed on the first and third awning. The Board required that the side logo be submitted for approval. Century 21 Real Estate—60 Washington Street—Awning Violation SRA staff reported that a Notice of Violation letter was sent to Century 21 on June 5, 2000. An application was returned and a confirmation letter to attend DRB meeting was sent on June 21, 2000. The applicant was not present at the July 6, 2000 meeting. • One Salem Green • Salem, Massachusetts 01.970 • (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 • Fax (978) 740-0404 r� DRB RECOMMENDATION: No action was taken on the application. The DRB instructed staff to notify the applicant that his attendance is • required at the next regularly scheduled DRB meeting. Bangkok Paradise—90 Washington Street—Awning Violation SRA staff reported that a Notice of Violation letter was sent to Bangkok Paradise on June 5, 2000. Ms. Mary Wanapha appeared before the Board to request approval for the existing awnings. DRB RECOMMENDATION: DRB recommended that the two awnings be allowed to remain with the condition that the yellow awning is lowered to match the height of the blue awning. Century Bank- 37 Central Street—Sign Violation SRA staff reported that a Notice of Violation letter was sent to Century Bank on June 5, 2000. Mr. Robert Covino from Sign Salem Inc., presented an application for approval of face changes to Century bank signs that have a red background and white lettering. There are two building signs and two directional signs. He also requested approval for the vinyl-applied strips to the windows, as shown in the photographs. DRB RECOMMENDATION: Approve as presented. • Lobster Shanty—25 Front Street—TV Dish Antenna Mr. William Kelley, owner of the Lobster Shanty has requested approval to remove an existing roof antenna and install a TV Dish. The dish is 18" in diameter and would be placed on an extension pole attached to the north side of the building. Mr. Kelley also informed the Board that he understands that he has to apply for an outdoor cafe permit, and will make application at a latter date. DRB RECOMMENDATION: Requested a site visit. Result of site visit: Approve application to erect a free standing pole in the rear of the structure in a position that is the least visible with a height not to exceed 10 feet. Pole location and height will be confirmed with SRA staff when satellite company tests signal clearances. Kalifornia Cafe—24 New Derby Street—Sign& Cafe Application Mr. Scott Leahy appeared before the Board with an application to erect a 4' diameter, round sign on the New Derby street side of his building. Mr. Leahy informed the Board that the sign has been erected, and requested it be allowed to remain. Mr. Leahy explained that he has also seeking approval for his outside seating. SRA staff informed the Board that the Market& • Y F. Tourist Commission also has jurisdiction in this area, and they requested that the DRB be made aware of their concern for public access along the walkway. • DRB RECOMMENDATION: Requested a site visit. Results of site visit: The Board allowed the sign to remain. They recommended that the lattice work barriers be removed and the existing planter/rope scheme be continued. The Board also recommended that because of the distance between the edge of the cafd and the market stall across the way,the boundary be set at an angle so the tables can be rearranged further down the wall of the Market restroom building and the walkway could be opened up. • • I • DRB MEETING MINUTES JUNE 159 2000 A meeting of the Design Review Board was held on Thursday, June 15, 2000, at 4:30 p.m. in the second floor conference at One Salem Green. DRB members in attendance were Fred Johnson and Don Giard. Peabody Block—Connecting Corridor Walkway Mr. Ray Guertin,project architect, presented revised plans of the link corridor walkway. He showed the Board a photograph depicting where the corridor would be located and where it would be visible. Mr. Guertin explained that this design responds to the previous suggestions of the DRB. The amount of glass has been reduced; white recessed panels with moldings and a gable roof have been designed. Mr. Guertin stated that this corridor will be used to place electrical conduit to connect the different buildings. Mr. Johnson asked what material wood be used for the panels. Mr. Guertin responded that the panels would be constructed of mdo plywood with applied moldings. Mr. Giard asked Mr. Guertin to explain the roof transition. Mr. Guertin explained that there • would be a 3 %z" to 4" crown molding at the cornice line. Mr. Johnson asked if the windows could be opened. Mr. Guertin replied that the windows would be fixed and not be operable. He continued that the windows will have internal mullions and will be white clad Anderson windows. Mr. Johnson responded that this would be acceptable, especially since this would alleviate a maintenance problem. At this time Mr. Johnson made a formal request that the building owner and project architect address the issue of tenant signage and provide a comprehensive sign system for the buildings for DRB review and approval. He continued that this comprehensive plan is important so the tenant knows the exactly how much, what type, and the location of signage that will be allowed. Mr. Giard concurred, and SRA staff was instructed to send a correspondence to the building owner relaying this request. Mr. Johnson asked Mr. Guertin when the Board would review designs for the two prominent facades facing Lappin Park. He made a formal request that the project architect begin to study these facades and arrive at a plan that enhance the appearance of these prominent facades. Mr. Giard concurred, and SRA staff was instructed to send a correspondence to the building owner relaying this request. • iS Mr. Johnson made a motion to approve the walkway corridor as shown in the plan presented. The approved corridor shall be constructed of mdo plywood panels with molding and Anderson white clad windows. The corridor will be painted white. Mr. Giard seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Please note: The SRA has approved the roof walkway conditional upon DRB final review and approval. The action taken at this DRB meeting constitutes final approval for the roof walkway corridor. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Ellen S. Dubinsky Secretary • • f-. SOP DRB RECOMMENDATIONS June, 2000 Omnipoint Communications—Hawthorne Hotel Roof—Antenna Panels An application was received to mount six antenna panel.on the fagade of the existing elevator penthouse A Mylar veneer will be adhered to the panels to match the existing brick color and pattern. Two panels and a connecting cable will be attached to each side of the North, East and West penthouse facades. An encased base unit will be placed on the roof in the L-shaped area next to the penthouse. A wall to screen the unit will be erected around the alcove with a matching brick veneer. • DRB RECOMMENDATION: Approve as presented. Peabody Block— Site Visit - Brick Materials& Windows & Trim A site visit was conducted to review brick and mortar samples at the Peabody Block, window choices and paint trim. DRB RECOMMENDATION: Approve the `Mason's Sample' brick for the Barton Square elevation. The mortar color shall be Workrite CBM 128. The mortar jointing shall match the existing as close as possible. Approve the Vermont Brick sample for the Essex Street building. The mortar color shall be Workrite CBM 127. The mortar jointing shall match the existing as close as possible. The white marble stone veneer sample for the base of the building was approved as presented. Approve the replacement of the Lappin Park fagade 12, upper windows with vinyl windows to match what has been installed throughout the building. The grille system shall `� be 9/2. .z h Approve the replacement of the double hung window on 1 the fourth floor windows of the Peabody Building with a 1/1 window to better reflect the original window configuration of a single muntin bottom sash. Approve the painting of all exterior wood trim with the color white. Other paint colors,particularly of the first floor storefronts, if so decided will be submitted to the DRB for approval. Approval of the windows along the first floor Barton Square fagade of the Peabody Building were approved as installed. Discussion took place regarding the location of downspouts along the Barton Square Building. The DRB recommended that the building owner first obtain approval from the City Engineer before the DRB reviews the proposed downspout locations. One Salem Green,Salem,MA 01970 978-745-9595,ext.311 Salem Planning 978-740-0404,fax Department • Fax To: John Goff—740-0775 From: Ellen Dubinsky Chris Greene—617-536-0626 Don Giard—740-0404 Farc Pages: 2(not including cover sheet) Phone: Date: May 16,2000 Re: Armory Fence CC: ❑ Urgent ❑ For Review ❑Please Comment X Please Reply ❑Please Recycle • The Peabody Essex Museum has submitted a plan to place a stockade fence along the Essex Street facade, as shown on the attached plan. The fence will match the existing stockade fence along the New Liberty Street side of this parcel. At the request of Mayor Usovicz,this stockade fence will enable the removal of the necessary, but unsightly Jersey barriers surrounding the site. As you can see,the plan calls for a grass area and benches,which can be reviewed at the next regularly scheduled DRB meeting. At this time, I would ask each of the members to review the plan and authorize the erection of this fence so that this parcel can be secured and the Jersey barriers can be removed. If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. • TeMPORARY ARMORY-PARK 5641.E%/6"-I,OL 5 12 2000 N 5 L 18ERTV 5TK 51 0 ln+a(� DF it —sfocKpDp Pp" �x smuf- (,• �i11e105FAAKEA ld#c AL 51 0 Lx.w /Mdh LIt/ 0 KMFOIL CixAOAW Q IdIrA 41.1 L. ,x (NNW 4 IAI, I I bop .AAW lkNx ,Mtu Lur4s g W1u rrV' C 4r II14t duh t .rl1 u (UIMM(!iK Na�G .. From HISTORIC PRESERIJAT(ON & DESIGN PHONE No. : 978 740 0775 May. 16 2000 3:24PI P01 ri; 1 .. nn T1'1[ 1J']1 I'iS :�Sti ; IU „auJ 1'1 e ,b IIm rA'c ?o sewao-i (Z ) -Two Pa GES 'Tq�taL pV�Il..fsK1( May 16, 2(100 'rtDF1 .Jml J Go �+14RIZAT1pN DOCUMENT FOR THE HEOUPST TO ERECTA$TOCKAnF FENCC ON THF FASEX STREET FAf;ADE OF THE ARMORy 1'A1it:Fl_ MAY 16,2000 I hand uor,a,to alkw Ul a Amwry silo. erection a,l U,o_'k-knoe,WereOn they Essrx Street iaagade of Ulv -_ � y�T '}r �LA(>POLE� gE.0 GFlei/ �0� Sl�i✓f I (v�S OF O PAP. M/ I do nol aprw,to allewv the erection of Uaa uhx:Rade fcnco on the ESa:h1X:ihed fn�Ade (Ile a BIKAVE] Armory site. OT • nRA Mel n bate (Pleane fax your reply to the Planning Department at 740-0404 as Won m possible. Thank you for Your COOPerstbr,in tills mat(vr,) jF /1PfRcvwL (`3T1106 ate t✓Pea1 _ • Wg� ¢tz►1GE S�LT10►�S To 8� P1+Iw1TE��k�� • ►JEW �p1�+�.G. -To B8 a itfci6trT ALSAIJellj • N�,,, tr F�I-K E Tc I tJ TEI-SEAT pW Ht+6Q. IUu AT LINE OF 1rX�St1w�C� �aToct..uE fG►-1 • PC_)AC9-wtT To EX SSC[l r(. MG L i=ENCC CS£f �U° . Page ?AL)Etli FnU1�G NY3-� 1.�66GC ( Sr�1cET -rib Sc fe-KIDVO ICED IN Z P�ncxs To ^a-V J ee.,oee. ,r �f o'rHet•-- PM's+ NS^4-`lW• From HISTORIC PRESMVATION & DESIQJ PHONE No. : 976 740 0775 May. 16 2600 3:24PN P02 t� Y V Olt,(1111WtIE 14:t FAI 07,4 740 Q404 Yta,Iliin6 owl -r�MPMAIAY ARMORY IAM _NF-W L-1.8F,KTY 51RCET _ tO � ;o v Olt Q ,F�b lapel` Vrkv T pNRo - ; �U i �wNe - n I.MM i AT • frrr�n. -�Lfs 7_ 51, & s0'( Are" G 13u u I.,by Soo IAW 6 I V PLS K May 16 00 04: O5p The Halvorson Company, Inc [617) 536-0626 p. l e5/10/00 TILE 14:15 FAX 978 740 0404 Planning Booz May 16,2000 • AUTHORIZATION DOCUMENT FOR THE REQUEST TO ERECT A STOCKADE FENCE ON THE ESSEX STREET FA4ADE OF THE ARMORY PARCEL May 16,2000 5je 1 hereby agree to Mow the wection of B1e gw*ade*m on the Essex Street%pade of rm Armory site. 1 do not agree to allow the erection of the stockade Wm on ft Essex Street of the Armory sbe- AV ql-(p 00 D Member Date f ( i (Please tax your reply to the Planning Department at 740-0404 as soon as possible Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.) v os� 7671 F post-1� Fax Note . w 3 � So N F • Page 2 • May 16, 2000 AUTHORIZATION DOCUMENT FOR THE REQUEST TO ERECT A STOCKADE FENCE ON THE ESSEX STREET FACADE OF THE ARMORY PARCEL May 16,2000 rte( I hereby agree to allow the erection of the stockade fence on the Essex Street facade of the 111 VVV III Armory site. r7 I do not agree to allow the erection of the stockade fence on the Essex Street facade of the Armory site. 511,6 b DRB Member Date (Please fax your reply to the Planning Department at 740-0404 as soon as possible. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.) • • Page 2 Salem Redevelopment Authority DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA THURSDAY, MAY 4, 2000 Roll Call: John Goff Donald Giard Chris Greene Fred Johnson • I Discussion: 1. Fleet Bank— 193 Washington Street—Sign Application 2. Goddess' Treasure Chest— 173 Essex Street—Sign Application 3. Peabody Block Restaurants—Exterior Stove Vent—Barton Square Facade 4. East India Square Fountain Discussion esd\drb\agenda • One Salem Green • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (508) 745-9595, Ext. 311 • Fax (508) 740-0404 �l DRB MINUTES May 4, 2000 A meeting of the Design Review Board was held on Thursday, May 4, 2000 in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green at 4:30 p.m. Those in attendance were Don Giard, John Goff, and Fred Johnson. Executive Director Patrick Reffett and Staff Administrator Mary Cassidy were also present. Goddess' Treasure Chest— 173 Essex Street—Sign Application Ms. Sylvia Martinez appeared before the DRB with an application to erect a 1.5' x 15.5', wooden sign over her storefront. The sign has a black background and painted, gold letters, as shown in the submitted photograph. Ms. Martinez also presented an application for a 3' x 4', wooden sign to be placed on the side of her storefront. Mr. Goff made a motion to approve the 1.5' x 15.5' sign to be located in the sign band over the storefront, deny the 3' x 4' Psychic Readings sign proposed for the side of the building and to condition the approval on removal of A-frame sign from in front the store. Mr. Johnson seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Fleet— 193 Washington Street—Sign Application • An application was presented to replace the existing BankBoston signs with new Fleet signs as shown on the submitted photographs. Mr. Johnson made a motion to approve signs with the condition that the sign's logo and lettering be centered over the entrance door and the Washington and New Derby Streets signs be asymmetrical and the logo be centered directly above the window mullion. Mr. Goff seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Violation Letters At this time, the Board indicated that violations should be sent to the Century Bank, Bangkok Paradise and Century 21 Realty. Ms. Dubinsky responded that she would issue these violation letters. A Taste of Thyme Cafd/O'Neil's Pub— 120 Washington Street—Exterior Duct Syste An application was presented by Beverly Trueira and Ken Rothwell from A Taste of Thyme Cafe and Ronald Brogan from O'Neil's Pub to run a duct system up the exterior back wall of the building (Barton Square fapade) to the roof area. The system would begin where the existing vent is located, as depicted in the submitted photographs. They informed the Board that to run an interior duct system would be cost prohibitive (upwards of$17,000). The applicants stated • that they would paint the ductwork to match the brick. Mr. Brogan asked the Board if they would allow him to paint the front of his building with a color scheme that was indicative to an authentic Irish pub. Mr. Johnson commented that this venting issue needs to be part of the aesthetic plan for the building, and a solution from the architect needs to be presented. Mr. Goff stated that he was not as concerned about this element, mainly because it is in the rear of the building. The DRB recommended that a letter be sent to the building owner requesting that a solution regarding exterior ductwork be coordinated with the building architect, Mr. Ray Guertin. The DRB further recommended that a letter be sent to the building owner requesting that a unified sign system and storefront paint color scheme be coordinated with the building architect, Mr. Ray Guertin. East India Fountain Executive Director Reffett informed the DRB that the fountain at East India Square was repaired and the final result does not match what was existing. He informed the Board that the Mayor will be appointing a City Historic Preservation Officer to ensure that future public and private improvement projects go through the proper review and approval processes. Mr. Reffett • suggested that an outside funding source be considered to raise funds to repair the fountain as existing or perhaps entertain new design ideas by this Board or a public design competition. John Goff offered to contact an entity called Save our Sculptures and Historic Salem, Inc. to pursue as possible funding sources. Fred Johnson offered to speak with the Peabody Essex Museum regarding opportunities to coordinate a design competition for a new fountain design. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Ellen S. Dubinsky Secretary • v Salem Redevelopment Authority DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA THURSDAY, APRIL 6, 2000 Roll Call: John Goff Donald Giard Chris Greene Fred Johnson Discussion: 1. Army Barracks—Corner of Essex&Washington Streets—Awning Application 2. Starbucks Coffee—Washington Street—Cafe Permit 3,— Peabody Block—Detail Drawings Review 4. The Landmark—Assisted Living Center, Washington Street—Fagade Review 5. Chestnut Square—Norman Street—Landscape Review esd\drb\agenda One Salem Green • Salem Massachusetts 01970 • 508 745-9595 Ext. 311 • Fax 508 740-0404 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MINUTES THURSDAY,APRIL 6, 2000 A meeting of the Design Review Board was held on Thursday, April 6, 2000 in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green at 4:30 p.m. Those in attendance were Don Giard, John Goff, Chris Greene, and Fred Johnson. Staff Administrator Mary Cassidy was also present. Starbucks—211 Washinaton Street—Cafe Permit Ms. Julie McDaid, manager of Starbucks, appeared before the DRB for a Cafe Permit. The application called for four, black, 28" round tables with two black chairs at each table to be placed per plan on the Dodge Street side of the store. Mr. Greene made a motion to approve the application as presented. Mr. Johnson seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Army Barracks—234 Essex Street—Sign Application An application to recover existing awning frames at 234 Essex Street in Forest Green Sunbrella fabric with Army Barracks lettered on each valance was reviewed by the DRB. The lettering • will be white and the stars will be yellow. The valance is 10 inches high and the lettering will be 8 inches high. Mr. Johnson recommended that the no writing be on the second and fourth awning, this way the sign will be able to be read better. Mr. Johnson made a motion to approve as presented with the condition that the lettering only is used on the first, third and fifth valance and a color sample of the lettering is submitted. Mr. Greene seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Peabody Block—Washington/Essex Streets—Detail Review Mr. Ray Guertin appeared before the Board and reviewed his detailed construction drawings with the Board. He presented brick and mortar samples for the Essex Street fagade and the Barton Square fapade of the link building, explaining that test panels will be constructed on site for the Board to review. He showed the Board details of the balustrade including the rail systems, posts and caps. Mr. Guertin informed the Board that an additional HVAC unit will be added, but will be hidden. Mr. Guertin also pointed that two new brick piers and a square awning box have been added to delineate the Phoenix School entrance on the Lappin Park fagade. Mr. Goff recommended that the windows being proposed to be blacked out have a piece of black painted plywood applied to the back of the glass and not paint directly on the glass. • • Mr. Johnson expressed his concern regarding the walkway. He felt it should be less utilitarian looking, and suggested it could be taller. He added that more mullions should be used in the window design to give the structure more vertical proportion. Mr. Greene commented that the walkway needs some refinement in its detail, proportion and scale. The Board asked that Mr. Guertin return with revised drawings for the walkway, based on the comments discussed at this meeting. Mr. Greene made a motion to approve details as presented with the condition that the windows which are being proposed to be blacked out have a black plywood panel placed behind them, instead of the black being applied directly to the glass. Mr. Goff seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Chestnut Square—Norman Street—Landscaping Design David Jaquith, architect, appeared before the DRB with color samples for the body and trim paint and awning for the building. The awning will be green Sunbrella and the paint will be Pratt & Lambert Cottage White and Silver Blond. He then presented the landscaping proposal, which calls for replacing all three trees on the Crombie Street facade with new Honey Locust trees and low juniper plants and seasonal plantings. Lighting on the Crombie Street fagade will be installed to shine onto the parking area. • Mr. Greene recommended that the scale of the previous trees be maintained, so the new trees should probably be 8" caliper trees and they should be as tall as the existing. Mr. Greene continued that yews should be used in place of Junipers and the edge be as high as that of Joe's Auto Laundry, which are approximately 3 feet high, so there should be a raised bed of yews 2 feet deep and a 6 inch granite curb should be added to the plan to serve as an edge. He also stated that the lights should be no higher than the trees. Mr. Jaquith also presented plans for a low directory sign at the corner of the property to identify Chestnut Square and its tenants. The Board was receptive to the design of the sign and the surrounding area. Mr. Greene made a motion to approve the paint and awning colors as presented and approve the landscape plan with the condition that the new trees be in scale with what is currently existing in caliper and height, and that yews be substituted for junipers on the plan and the light poles be no higher than the trees, and that the granite curb and planting bed configurations be drawn as per DRB suggestions. Mr. Johnson seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Please note the DRB also supported the request of the applicant to install a directory sign to identify Chestnut Square. • • Simsbury/Assisted Living Facility—Washington & New Derby Streets—Facade Review Mr. Al Crepeau and Attorney George Atkins presented revised elevation drawings to the DRB. Mr. Crepeau explained that these new drawings incorporate the DRB's suggestions offered at the previous meeting. Mr. Crepeau started by showing the redesign of the balcony. He also showed the Board the redesign of the upper story, and pointed out that soffit lighting has been added to the upper story. H 1 He also resented a signage and li lighting system for the first level sconces as shown on the plan Pg g Y at the retail store level,to the Board. Mr. Crepeau explained that he had studied the odd bay window configuration suggested by the Board, and after several drafts,he determined that the current window system should remain. He then explained his alterations to the corner,tower fagade. Attorney Atkins submitted a lease provision regarding balcony usage for the record. This provision will ensure that the balconies and plant materials will look uniform. Mr. Goff responded to the plans, commenting that the corner tower needs to stand out more. Currently it is just a plain brick mass, and there needs to be something decorative, like recess panels or a panel with the name of the complex. He also suggested that the roof of the tower portion be brought back to make the tower higher. wMr. Giard asked the architect to look at placing brick soldier courses over the lintel of the windows. Mr. Goff made a motion to approve the fagade elevations as presented with the condition that the architect review the use of soldier courses above the windows and/or some decorative panels, especially on the tower portion of the building and that the roof of the tower portion be brought back to make the tower higher. Mr. Johnson seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Please Note: The landscaping details have not been approved, and configurations could be altered if changes are implemented around the Marketplace area, as per a condition in the Planning Boardyecision. Please Note: All materials, finishes, colors, and hardware specifications must be submitted to the DRB for final approval. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Ellen S. Dubinsky • Secretary Salem Redevelopment Authority DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA THURSDAY, MARCH 16, 2000 Roll Call: John Goff Donald Giard Chris Greene Fred Johnson • Discussion: 1. Landmark at Salem- Simsbury Assisted Living Development - Washington&New Derby Streets— Fagade Review 2. Chestnut Square- 28 Norman Street—Fagade Renovations esd\drb\agenda • One Salem Green • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (508) 745-9595, Ext. 311 • Fax (508) 740-0404 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MINUTES • THURSDAY, MARCH 16, 2000 A meeting of the Design Review Board was held on Thursday, March 16, 2000 in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green at 8:30 a.m. Those in attendance were Don Giard, John Goff, Chris Greene, and Fred Johnson. Executive Director Patrick Reffett and Staff Administrator Mary Cassidy were also present. Landmark at Salem—Washington Street—Facade Review Mr. Al Crepeau addressed the members of the DRB. He stated that he had revised his drawings as recommended by the Board at the last meeting and as suggested by sketches provided to him from Don Giard. Mr. Crepeau listed the four major issues discussed: the accentuation of the corner of the building; the design changes to the top level to minimize the height of the building; strengthening the cornice line to break up the massing of the building; and eliminating the balconies. Mr. Crepeau continued that he has addressed all of these issues, except the elimination of the balconies. He felt strongly that the balconies were a valuable part of this project and do help to break up the building massing and will add character and life to the streetscape. At this time, Mr. Crepeau distributed revised sketches to the Board members. As Mr. Greene was not present at the initial design meeting, Attorney George Atkins gave a brief overview of the proposed plan and the changes requested by the Planning Board. Mr. Atkins pointed out that as part of the Planning Board decision revision of these plans must be presented to the Planning Board. • Mr. Goff complemented the architect for his excellent submittal, and stated it should serve as a standard for project submittals. Mr. Goff asked the timeframe for this project. Mr. Atkins responded that the preparation of the construction documents should take a few months and the financing applications needs to be submitted, which can now happen since the City Council has released the fagade easement. Mr. Reffett pointed out that the architect has been very responsive to all of the Boards' suggestions and meaningful changes and a great deal of betterments have been added to the plan. Mr. Goff commented that he liked the new definition of the corner tower. He did comment that it was unusual to see a 4-6 bay configuration and suggested the architect look at a 5-7 configuration. Mr. Crepeau commented that was investigated, but it made the interior configuration too difficult. Mr. Johnson asked if the balconies would be occupied. Mr. Crepeau responded that the balconies are 4 '/2 feet deep and are intended to be occupied. Mr. Goff suggested that wrought iron be used on the balcony as a decorative element. Mr. Johnson expressed his concern that the balconies will become an unattractive element if not • standardized. Attorney Atkins responded that this can be controlled through language in the tenant leases. Mr. Greene stated that the flowers all be the same, the flower boxes, all be the same, etc. to ensure uniformity. • Attorney Atkins responded that he would discuss this with the owners. Mr. Goff asked Mr. Crepeau to outline the materials being proposed. Mr. Crepeau responded that the fagade would consist of panel granite, brick, and a string coarse of cast stone. Mr. Goff asked how many commercial units would be on the first floor. Mr. Crepeau stated that currently there are three tenant spaces, but the area can be divided for up to five tenants. Mr. Greene asked Mr. Crepeau to review the landscaping portion of the project. Mr. Crepeau explained the landscaping. He added that the City has asked him to look into reconfiguring the Marketplace, which will result in some changes to the landscaping plan. Attorney Atkins pointed out that as part of the Site Plan Review Decision, the City Planner has the authority to require more landscaping, if he deems necessary. Mr. Greene commented that the island on the Front Street facade should be bigger to soften the driveway/traffic area and amount of pavement, and in general the area needs to relate better to a pedestrian scale. Mr. Johnson expressed his concern that the loading dock area looked like a whole. Mr. Crepeau responded that the Planning Board required the design you see today. Mr. Johnson and Mr. Greene were not in favor of the current design. • Mr. Reffett stated that this design can be redrawn to have this area look presentable and still be functional. He continued that the Planning Board Chairman will meet to discuss some modification to the designs, but it is important that the plan not be greatly altered, since it could result in an entirely new permitting process through the Planning Board. Mr. Goff requested that detailed sign package be submitted by the applicant. Mr. Crepeau thanked the Board for its comments, and he stated that he would incorporate the suggestions made at this meeting and will present the modifications at the next DRB meeting. Chestnut Square—Norman Street—Facade Renovation Amendment Mr. David Jaquith appeared before the Board with an amendment to the gable/canopy on the fagade of the building. In view of this movement the Board requested that the door/window column distance be realigned, the canopy be made wider/bigger and the post be moved so it is not in front of the doorway. Mr. Jaquith agreed to these plan revisions. Mr. Goff made a motion to approve the amendment with the DRB revisions. Mr. Johnson seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. • There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Ellen S. Dubinsky Secretary Memorandum To: Al Crepeau From: Don Giard Date: 02/15/00 Re: Landmark at Salem Thank you for responding so quickly with your revised drawing. Included are a few suggestions to help you respond to the concerns presented by the DRB Board. 1. Emphasize the corner. The addition of brick is a great idea, but try raising the corner element to create a distinguished tower. We had discussed a lantern/ widow's nest theme at our DRB meeting, and something like this would help create an identity for the building and Downtown Salem. • 2. De-emphasize the top level. Stepping the level back helps minimize the visual impact from the street, but the white stucco material and pediment details draw too much attention further out. One way to minimize the impact of this level is to make it appear to be a clerestory window. This can be done by eliminating the pediment details, increasing the amount of glazing and using a darker tone for the stucco. 3. Strengthen the cornice line. Emphasizing the cornice with the use of stone will help break up the massing of the building. 4. Building Massing. Breaking up the massing by creating a series of vertical elements is a great idea. However, the design of the balconies creates an awkward void in the building massing. One solution is to eliminate the balconies and replace them with a projecting vertical bay window. This will eliminate the awkward void and will create more visual interest along the street. I have included a rough sketch to illustrate some of these suggestions. I look forward to meeting with you again soon. I , r�rntsl�,ER. e ante cawvx eunllvaz¢ fCgIMFJ�[ tpr, L r*-3QOT1 Mq wl►ac>;W ieplac><s V�4L CaNM'1'1�61t X' � ENGELBRECHT AND GRIFFIN ARCHITECTS PC. i Match 13,2000 Mt.Chard City of Salem Flatming Depattment One Salem(meet EGA MA 01970 EGA Re: Landmark at Salem,MA Dear W. Giar& I would like to take this opportunity to address some of your suggestions which were sent to us on February 15,2000. , • Suggestion#I was to emphasize the comer. Like yourself,we would like to create an icon element at the prominent vomer of the proposed building. We are currently in the process of designing this element and we will have something to show you at our next meeting. • Suggestion#2 was to de-empbasize the top level. We oonetr with your thoughts that perhaps the pediment design does draw too much attention to the tap level and so we are currently looking at other design solutions. We believe that the loggia design for the Majority of the top level works very effectively as light colored columns and lintels with at deeply recessed wall with glazing. We believe that the top level should be a light color to appear less obtrusive, • Suggestion 03 was to strengthen the cornice line. We agree with this suggestion and you • tight have noticed that the cornice was strengthened considerably in the sketch we sent you on February S. • Suggestion#4 commented on the building massing. Unfortunately,we disagree on this topic. We feel strongly that the vertical voids with balconies holp break up the building's mass more effectively than a protruding element, We also feel that the balconies add life and interest to the streetscape by having a place for plantings and personal interaction which we would not have with enclosed bay traits. As I have mentioned,we are currently working on the design of this building and we hope to have revised sketches to show you at our neat meeting. We are looking forward to meeting with you again soon. Sincere�� Albert W. Crepeau NBUPYPORT 12 AUwRN STREET,NE"URYPORT.MAssAoiwTr9 01990,97a 462$515 FAX 07B 462 5525 3 MOINf$ ��c'd 66i'Cihl FJj4JI 5+1l03?19'129H3 UTM:_ 6�="6T'?JHW r g� l Y RJR • Landmark at Salem Van Ness Development Corporation " NmWr B Febn.r 2000 Oaz hlal -Icnv • ® � Salem Redevelopment Authority DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 24, 2000 Roll Call: John Goff Donald Giard Chris Greene Fred Johnson • Discussion: 1. Carlson Real Estate—207 Washington Street— Sign Application 2. Simsbury ^ =. gn� * F ae ew 3. Peabody Block—Fagade Renovations esd\drb\agenda • One Salem Green • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (508) 745-9595, Ext. 311 • Fax (508) 740-0404 DRB MINUTES February 24,2000 A meeting of Design Review Board was held on Thursday, February 24, 2000 in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green. Those in attendance were: John Goff, Don Giard and Fred Johnson. Executive Director Patrick Reffett and Staff Assistant Mary Cassidy were also present. Carlson Real Estate —207 Washington Street— Sign Application A sign application was presented to change the face panel of the illuminated sign box at 207 Washington Street. The lexan face is 2' high and 14'6"in length. Translucent red and blue vinyl lettering will be used as depicted in the submitted drawing. Mr. Goff made a motion to approve the application as presented. Mr. Giard seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. • Peabody Block— 120 Washington Street—Fagade Renovations Ray Guertin, architect,presented elevations for renovation of four different portions of the building complex. Mr. Guertin explained his design philosophy to the Board stating that there are four critical buildings that comprise the site and a link structure that connects the buildings together. He continued that it is his intent to highlight the four buildings and play down the link structure. Gas & Light Building—Essex Street FaVade Mr. Guertin present plans for this fapade which were a result of the DRB comments offered at a site visit conducted in December of 1999. The redesign of this fagade is in keeping with the original construction of this 1913 building. The first level space will have two entrances and wood will be used to create the pilasters and pediments. Marble veneer will-be added to the base to match existing. The one element added to the building was a large structural steel beam that must remain due to structural and financial issues. Mr. Guertin proposes to address this horizontal band at a latter phase in the construction. Currently he is suggesting some type of color/painting treatment. The upper and lower middle window design will match and the two upper side windows (which are now 15/2) will be 8/8. He stated that as construction goes on, paint colors will be chosen. He was considering painting the strong horizontal band or mid cornice the same color as the bricks, although this is not definite, and will be discussed latter. • Mr. Goff stated that he still had concerns regarding the steel beams and the paint colors, but felt that Mr. Guertin had responded to the DRB comments. Mr. Goff made a motion to approve this fagade design for the Gas & Light Building with the • condition that all materials, finishes, colors, and hardware specifications be submitted to the DRB for final approval. Mr. Giard seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Mr. Goff suggested that the developer explore, at a latter time, a way to cut back the steel to redesign the building to more of its original design state and perhaps reintroducing a balustrade. He continued that State grant funds could be used to facilitate this, and might result in historic tax credits for the developer. Barton Square Building Fagade Mr. Guertin presented revised plans for the Barton Square Playhouse building. Per the DRB's comments,this redesign has been accomplished by altering the interior staircase, therefore producing a three bay fagade design—wood panel, window, transom—with a door, which will serve as the major entry and exit for the Phoenix School. The door has a sidelight on each side and a glazed top panel. Because of the interior floor heights, some of the transom glass will be painted black. Mr. Guertin showed the second story elevation with three 12/2 double hung vinyl windows installed. He requested that the Board allow them to remain as installed. Mr. Goff suggested that a more traditional door scheme be submitted and the lower panels have molding details. Mr. Giard commented that he was not concerned with the triple hung windows on the upper story, as they match the other building windows. • Mr. Goff made a motion to approve the design plans as presented with the condition that details, such as moldings, be added to the wooden panels and submitted for final design approval and that a more traditional door scheme be submitted and all materials, finishes, colors, and hardware specifications must be submitted to the DRB for final approval. Mr. Johnson seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Link Structure—Fagade Renovation —Barton Square Elevation Mr. Guertin explained that this core structure was designed to connect the Barton Square building to the core structure. In an effort to play down the linking systems between buildings, this proposal calls for the facade to be renovated with a combination of stucco and brick piers. As shown on plans,the air intake grill area will be enclosed with brick. A new cornice design, similar to the Lappin Park fayade has been added, and the balcony for use by the Phoenix School has been designed. The HVAC units (3) which are 6'x6'x4' will be located on this side of the walkway so at not to be seen on Essex Street. The units will be painted to diminish their shiny, reflective surfaces. Mr. Goff expressed his concern regarding the stucco going all the way down the fagade. He felt the building needed a base. Mr. Johnson stated he did not have a problem with the stucco, although the color needs to be carefully selected. He did suggest that a stronger horizontal element be added to the building at the balcony level. • The DRB requested that the architect draw the balcony detail without the awning; add some base material to the fagade or at least the brick piers; consider adding a planting bed or large urns with trellis growing plants/vines to soften/hide the stucco; consider adding a 1'-2' railing • system/balustrade on the cornice which would help better conceal the rooftop units; consider adding a stronger horizontal element at the balcony level; push out the edge of the right column so the column is flat and does not bend; and enlarging the two windows on the stucco facades.) Mr. Goff made a motion to approve this elevation plan with the recommendations outlined today. Mr. Johnson seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. Roof Walkway/Connecting Corridor Mr. Guertin presented plans for the connecting corridor that will run from the link core structure to the other buildings so each building can have access to the elevator and fire stairs. The walkway will be approximately 7 '/z ` — 8' high with a pitched roof. The Barton Square fagade will have a stucco surface, and the Essex Street fagade will be glass, as shown. The corridor is approximately 6 feet wide. There are three access doors, as shown, provided to access the roof and rooftop equipment. Mr. Johnson made a motion to approve this elevation as presented. Mr. Goff seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. (Please Note: All materials, finishes, colors, and hardware specifications for the above approvals must be submitted to the DRB for final approval.) • There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Ellen S. Dubinsky Secretary • �l DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MINUTES FRIDAY,FEBRUARY 4,2000 A meeting of the Design Review Board was held on Friday, February 4, 2000 in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green at 8:30 a.m. Those in attendance were Don Giard, John Goff and Executive Director Patrick Reffett. Landmark at Salem—Washington Street—Facade Review Attorney George Atkins presented a general overview of the proposed project for an assisted living facility developed by Simsbury Associates. He informed the Board that the Historic Commission, Board of Appeal, City Council (release of an easement), and most recently the Planning Board have reviewed this development. At this time Al Crepeau from EGA reviewed the drawings for this new building. He explained that several design techniques were used to break-up the building's massing including cubed- shaped sections of brick split up by balconies and stepping back the upper level and using a different material on the top floor. He presented elevations for the parking garage entrance to the building explaining the massing was stepped down for this elevation to reflect the lower massing of buildings along Front Street. Mr. Crepeau pointed out that although the building is six stories high, it is actually lower than surrounding building heights due to older buildings having higher floor heights and the varying • topography of the area. He continued that various materials will be used to create the Federal style building including GFRC, EIFS, cast stone, aluminum-backed granite and brick panels that mortar can be added to on-site. He showed a sample of the brick panel to the Board. The panels are metal studded and can be bolted into the steel frame of the building. Mr. Goff expressed his concern that there was too large of a gap between the bricks in the sample shown. Mr. Goff commented that the presentation given by Mr. Crepeau was very good and informative. He expressed his concern with the scale of the building. He felt that more variety and details could be added to alleviate this, and he also commented that the storefront should be recessed and consistent in the three-block pattern. Mr. Atkins informed the Board that the intent of the retail space is to house multiple tenants that could provide appropriate services for the residents. Mr. Goff also expressed his concern with the way the balconies on New Derby Street are visualized. He did state that the smaller scaled building was designed well. He commented that the building would be stronger if there was a large belt course between the fourth and fifth floors. He suggested it be detailed as a cornice. Mr. Giard expressed his concern over the recessed balconies. He felt that they should be project out and not be recessed. He also felt the corner of the building should project out. • Mr. Crepeau stated that the balconies have been removed from the New Derby Street fagade and the retail space will have three distinct recessed entrances. He also pointed out the panel of the New Derby Street side has been removed to create a more open space. Attorney Atkins informed the DRB that the Planning Board requested that the comer of the building not be so prominent. Mr. Goff commented that he felt the way to portray a Federal style building and relieve the massing would be to make the comer brick so it would read as one building. He added that stone sill or stone lintel details could be added to reducing the massing. Mr. Crepeau responded that he is investigating the use of cast stone material to be used for window details. Mr. Goff suggested that a cardboard model be produced for this project, since it has so many different levels and transitions,that seeing all the angles would be helpful. Mr. Crepeau responded that a model is being contemplated. He thanked the Board for their suggestions, and will start to incorporate them into a new set of drawings for further review. Salem Cycle-316 Derby Street—Sign Application Mr. Dan Shuman appeared before the DRB with an application to erect a 4' x 5' right angle sign to the building located at 316 Derby Street. The sign will be made of plywood and be airbrushed. It will be hung on an existing bracket. The sign will have a black background with gold letters and a gold border. • Mr. Goff made a motion to approve the application as presented with the condition that the edges of the sign be sealed or a gold bordered edging be added for protection from the elements. Mr. Giard seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion so carried. There being no further business,the meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Ellen S. Dubinsky Secretary