Loading...
APPEALS DECISIONS 1960-1963 6+i xob,,�q • : : Ct# of �$ttl m, tssar4 utts Offire jaf the (tliig (9lerk mm •0 ° i B QIitg Qllerk n12'?A.S^r poP 100 grancis J_ XVnr4 ,A.. farf ding 491erk Pa...1"b 3 - QIiig all sou jum bDmith mquested to submit JAi dWli.aate your ammazl .elxrt for the year 1959. O Vmr assistwipo and Po-nusz tion ir,. the vwly :Mlinr, of the*.e repwts • wiU rxosed up the printing of thwe devumnts :?cr distriitution. Thw* you, v tau3 yo'ur's . AUGUSTE49 J. TOOM Y • February 2, 1960 To His Honor, Francis X. Collins, Mayor The Honorable City Council Salem, Massachusetts Gentlemen; Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 4, Section 16 Of the Revised Ordinances of Salem, Massachusetts, 1952, the Board of Appeal herewith submits its report and a summary of decisions rendered from May 210 1959 to Wcember 2, 1959. 1. Xuazmar Market., Inc, was granted a permit to erect an addition and convert the existing first floor apartment to increase the size of the .existing store at 109 Bridge Street, with condition. May 21, 1959 • 2. Laurien L+Italien was granted a permit to remodel the third floor of the three-story, four-family- dwelling at 56-56 Essex Street to provide, for two additional apartments. May 21, 1959 3, The Essex Institute was granted a variance to allow wooden exterior sidewalls on a building to be re- located from outside the fire limits to en area within the fire limits, at the corner of Essex Street .and Washington Square, to be restored as a historical structure. May 21,1959 4. Smile G. Moreau was granted a pormit to alter the third floor of the two and one-half etory, two-family dwelling at 26 Dow Street to provide for an additional apartment on the third floor. August 18, 1959 5. Anthony Goulet was granted a varianee to erect an addition to the garage at 21 Charles Street for storage of refrigerated trucks, with condition. August 18, 1959 6, Newhall Realty, Inc. was granted a permit to erect an addition to the Nursing Home at 7 Carpenter Street, with condition. September 1, 1959 • 7. John P. Conley was granted a permit to erect a motel at the rear of 320 Canal Street. November 17, 1959 8, Naumkeag Trust Company was granted a permit to erect an auto bank building at 24-26 Central Street. November 17, 1959 9. James H. Boulger, Jr. was granted a permit to erect an addition to his dwelling at 12 Monroe Road for a two-car garage. December 2, 1959 Respectfully submitted, BOARD OF APPEAL James F. Tobin, secretary r • • Marett 1,', 1960 DFCISI0l7 F .$anoxi W. olarke , 44 Walter Street The petitioner applied tear a permit to alter the third Moor of the, 2i story .twaa-f ami'ly dwelling at W Welter Street to convert In" a three-family dwelling. The Inspector of Suild crags refused the permit as the proposed change would be In violation of the 2ontng and Building Ord inanc ets* The petitioner appealed to this Board, and on March 144' 1960 at 7:30 p.mo in the office of the Inspector of Eaildinga, City Halll, Salem, a meeting of the Board of Appeal was held • purauant to notices mailed postpaid to the petitioner, the abutters andothers, and as advertised in the Salem Evening News on February 19 and 264 1960, The petitioner appeared and submitted a statoment of cost of improvements and operating eVenses and stated thatit would not be ;passible to maintain this property on a profitable basis without additional income. .io oae appeared in opposition. After due consideration thereof# the Boatrd, by a unanimous vote of :all five members present and voting, on the grounds that the proposed changes are asked to alleviate a hardship upon the petitioner,, and that granting of this permit would not substantially change the nature and ehw acter of the area. APPEAL GRANTED, ill o Board of Appeal �.0 BY C � March 17, V760 DECISION: Bogor R. Lapointe 8 Hancock street The petitioner applied for a permit to remodel the third floor of the 2, story tWO4 amity dwelling at 8 Hancock Street to, convert into a puree-family dwelling ant? the Building Inspector refused the permit as the proposed change would be in violation of the Building mad Zoning Ordinances, The petitioner appealed to this Board, and on March 14, 1960, at 8:00 p,m., in the office of the inspector of Buildings, City Hall, Salem, a meeting of the Board of Appeal was held • pursuant to notices mailed postpaid to the petitioner., the abutters end others, and as advertised in the Sa;.em FVening News on rebrum y 19 and 26, 2960. The petitioner apusared end stated that he had purchased the proporty about three years ago; and that he lived on the first floor of the dwelling, :After making extensive repairs and Improvements, the income from the second floor apartment did not. permit him to carry this house on a profitable 'basis. ' Na one appeared in opposition, After due consideration thereof, the Board, by a unanimous vote of 921 fives members present and voting, on the grounde that the proposed ohm a is asked to alleviate a hardship upon the petitioner, and that the granting of this appeal will not substaatiaily change the nature and character of the area, APPEAL GJRA$T=* Board of Appeal By �- larch Fal, 60 wvwvvrrgwr lD t: ' set the Ana"I !Appropriation £or the Zoeml of Appeal ahall be $350.00. y (� AUGUSM 4.- i z Ctv of �$atem, 'Ma5sar4noetts, w. ra office of #4e @Ic#g (clerk Tp/MIwL.� ��p (Lug TI.A Aramis & 'XV=4 'A..and QHg CI A 3R..m.1=b 3 eft mall April 29, 1960 James J. Tobin, Chairman Board of Appeal Salem, Massachusetts Dear Sir: - At a meeting of the 6ity Council held on April 28, 1960 the Mayors appointments of the following named persons as members • of the Board of Appeal for three (3) year terms expiring on May 12 1963 were confirmed by roll-call vote of 10 Yeas, 0 Nays, 1 Absent: William Abbott, 26 Hathorne Street J. Arthur Marchand, 159 Lafayette Stree. A -To 0 CITY CLERK • May 9, 1960 DECISION: Sylvania Electric Products,, Inc, r60 Boston Street The petitioner applied for a permit to erect an 801 x 203@ two-story factory building at r60 Boston Street and was refused by the Inspector of Buildings as the proposed con- struction`would be in violation of the Building Ordinance. The petitioner appealed to this:Board, and on May 3e 1960, at 7:30 p.ft.' in the office of the Inspector of Buildings, City Hall, Salem,' a meeting of the Board of Appeal was held pursuant. to the notices' mailed' postpaid to the petitioner,' the abutters and others,, Paul Brown,• Planning Engineer forithe petitioner appeared, as well as J.- H. Morin representing Paul H. Van Wert; Robert R.' Walker, Manager of Public Relations, Kenneth Demb, Supt. of • Plant Engineering Services, Robert E. Betts, Manager of Manu- facturing Services and Marion Munroe, Mr. Brown explained to the Board that the proposed building would sett bac'k• 106-, feet from the street line, that the'metal sandwich panels would consist of a 16-gauge aluminum face sheet and an 18- gauge galvanised steel inner sheet separated'by IP of fiber glass insulstioni and that the panel would be fastened to the steel building frame. He further stated that the panelsrwould be located on the upper part of the exterior building, walls and that the wall construction below .the panels and full height around the stair tower would be brick and block masonry construction, and that the use of such panels would permit a xpansion of the proposed building, which the petitioner expects to do in the future, William A. Cashman, President of Lynn Building Trades, Bricklayers Local #12, Lynn, appeared in opposition. After due consideration thereof, the Board, by a unanimous vote of all five members, on the grounds that the granting of this appeal would not substantially derogate from the purpose and intent of the Building Code. APPEAL GRANTED. - Boa of Appeal • "P '"� �J Secretary May 102 1960 DECISIONS Charles H. McManus 75 Dearborn Street The petitioner' applied for a. permit to remodel the North Shore Babies' and Children' s Hospital at 75 Dearborn ,S.treet. to be used, as a commercial school and: the building now used as a nursed, . , home as a dormitory for the school,, and was refused by the Inspector of Buildings as the proposed construction would be in violation of the Zoning and Building Ordinances of the City of Salem. (This area is gonad for single residence dwellings. ) The petitioner appealed to this Board, sad on April 11, 19600 in the office 'o f the Inspector of Buildings, City Hall, Salem, a meeting of the Board of Appeal was held pursuant to notices mailed to the petitionans the abutters and others, and as advertised in the Salem Evening News on March ll and 16, 1960. . • Attorney Roy K. Patch .appeared for the petitioner and informed the Board that the petitioner had entered into an agreement to purchase .the hospital building and the nurses home and a portion of the land ,aall belonging to the North Shore Babies' a?d, Chtldren, s Hospital; that he wished to use the property for .the Salem Commercial School to 'enlarge the school and .improve its quarters. He .further stated that the school has been in Salem for about seventy years, that it is at present occupying leased quarters, which do not permit expansion and where there are no parking facilities available. Attorney Patch further-7explained that there would be no changes to the exterior of the buildings, that the changes on the first floor of the _building now used as a hospital would consist of taking down existing partitions and enlarging the rooms as well as installing additional toilets, and that on the second floor certain partitions would also be taken down and rooms enlarged; and that the petition had the approval of the State Department of Public Safety., Arthur L 'Chases John MacNeil, and Frances Shevis appeared in opposition. . Decision gas deferred until a 1 t® da$Q tec us ,of opposition reg sttere by e, u tars to an ex, Pt,r V� oo r ght of way from Felt Street , • On April 25, 1960 a special meeting of the Board was held to give further consideration to this appeal . Decision was again deferred. • On May 3; 1960 Attorney Patch appeared before the Board and ex- plained that title to the right of way was in the North Shore Babies' and Children' s Hospital and that at the time of transfer of this property to the Hospital reservations were included in the deed granting easements to the owners of land abutting on this way. After ' due consideration of the Board, by a unanimous vote of all five members voting, on the grounds that variance for use of the building now used as • a hospital for a business school would not substantially derogate from the intent and purpose of the ordinance and that denial of the proposed variance would create a practical difficulty on the petitioner, use of said building as a business school and permit for alterations of the hospital building as shown on plans submitted GRANTED; use of building now used as a nurses' home as a dormitory for the school DENTED, Board of Appeal By � �•-6ac�.L.___ Secretary • June 349' 1960 DECISION® Salem housing Authority Nichols Street The petitioner applied For s permit to erect muult plerhype dwellings to provide housing for the elderly, at Nichols Street between Boston and Sutler Streets, and was refused by the Inspector of Buildings as the proposed construction would be in violation ,of the Zoning Ordinance inasmuch as a portion of this proposed development is in an area coned as two-Family district, The petitioner appealed to this Hoard, and on June 13, 1960 at 700 p.m, in. the office of the Inspector of Buildings, .j City Hall, Salem, a meeting of the Hoard of. Appeal was meld pursuant to notices mailed to the petitioner, the abutters and others',, and as advertised in the Salem Evening Yews on • May 6 and 13, 1960, Jars, Is Sterrett from the. office of John J. Mahoney & Asso- ciates, architects, Robert Ee O' Connor and George McCabe appeared for the Salem Housing Authority and outlined the plan of the proposed project. No one appeared In opposition, After due consideration, the Board, by unanimous vote of all five members voting, on the gromde that the proposed variance does not substantially derogate from the intent and purpose of the 'Ordinance and that it would result in direct benefit to the City, and that denial of the proposed variance would create'a practical difficulty and uanece>ssary hardehip and that the proposed variance would not substantially change the aspect of the area, aauthorizeP the Inspector of Buildings 4o Issue said permit and grants said variance. VARIANCR los A r Board of Appeal e Secretary August 290 1960 DECISION; William J, Murphy . Magliore L, Chagnon 492-494 Loring Avenue The petitioners applied for a permit to erect a frame building over lot line to serve two property owners as a garage ,on one side and a carport on the other, and were refused by the Inspector of Buildings as the proposed oonstruction would be in violation of the Building Ordinance, . The petitioners appealed to this Board, and on August 22, 1960s, at 7;30 p,m,, in the office of the Inspector of • Buildings, City Hall, Salem, a meeting of the Board of Appewl was held pursuant to the notices mailed, post- paid, .to .the petitioners, the abutters and others, The p6tItioners appeared and stated that at the present time there exists a "hot-top" driveway over the lot line which is used by both owners and that they wished to erect a frame building consisting of a garage on one side and a carport on the other. No one appeared,- in opposition. - After due consideration thereof, the Board, by unanimous vote of four members present and voting, on the grounds that the granting of the permit would conflict with the spirit of the building laws and would adversely affect the� valuej of the pr opertys APPEAL DENIED, o� 9 Board of Appeal . / Al Secretary CITY OF SALEM APPROPRIATION �• BOARD OF' APPEAL ITEM Axpenses PAY TO Name James F. Tobin ' Wet 237 Essex Street City..........Salome............................state.... Mass........... Pur.Order Invoice Discount Net • stamps, envelopes, stamped envelopes, folders, loose-leaf paper.. . . . . . ... . . . . .. 35.00 subscription, Zoning Bulletin. . . . . . . . . . . . 10.00 t � TOTAL 4 4rr�1 .©0 V Enclosedplease find cheque in payment of your account. For additional information please contact the department involved. CITY OF SALEM APPROPRIATION JOrT. BOARD OFAPPEAL ITEM Services i PAY TO ` Name Dolores E. Labrie Greet 237 Esser. Street City............Salem.,........................sMass, ........I.......... tate....... , .... .......... Pur.Order Invoice Discount Net Clerical services 205.00 �f TOTAL 205.00 6d Enclosed please find cheque in payment of your account. For additional information please contact the department involved. November 22, 1960 MECISION; David Goggin 300 Lafayette Street . he petitioner, applied for a permit to convert a portion of the pored at the front, of a f nur-family dwelling at 300 Lafayette Street into a real estate office, and was' refused by Vie Inspector of. Ruildings as the proposed change would,be Int violation of the Zoning and Building OrdSn€ances of the City of, Salem. The petitioner appealed to this Board. and on October 24, 1960 at 7130 p.m, in Vic office of the Inspector of Buildings, City lull, Salem, a Ma®ting of the Board of Appeal was hold pursuant to notices mailed to the petitioner, no abutters and others, P+x d as advertised in the Salem Evening News on October 1 and 3, 1960. • The petitioner appeared and stated that his wife is now maintaining a real estate office €fit this location aad he desired to make the alterations to enlarge her office. No one appeared in opposition. Decision was deferred by the Board until November 34, 1960 to permit the petitioner to submit a statement 'of income and expenses, Or. November 14, 1960, Attorney John 5eraf 3i'appeared for the petitioner and explained that the petitioner' s wife had curried on a real estate business at this address for two years and because of an increase in business it would be desirable to enlarge the office. He furnished "he-: Hoard with a statement ,of income .end opt*rating expenses of the petitioner showing th:C the present income from this property does not permit him to carry= it on a . profitable basis. After due consideration tgaereof, the Board,, by a unanimous vote of all five members present and voting, on the grounds that the proposed change w uld not substantially derogate from the Intent and purpose of the ordinance and would not zn- is tip, J • change the aspect of the areas and that denial of the proposed variance would create a practical difficulty and unnecessary hardship to the petitioner,, authorizes the Inspector of Buildings to issue said permit and grants the said variance specifically as the petition reads, .with the condition attached that said property will revert to its original status in the event that the petitionerfis wife ceases to Maintain said real estate business or the petitioner sells said property, and with the condition tbat, no sign be erected on the promises to exceed 20 x 44 in size, . an d that no sign be placed upon the dwelling, APPEAL GRANTI-A. . Board of Appeal Secretary • • November 220 1960 DELI-3I0xtn William K6 Laaaarakis 23 Andrew :street The petitioner applied for a permit to remodel the third floor of a 2* storys two-family dwelling at 23, Andrew Street to provider for an additional apartment, and was rsfused by the Inspector of Building) at the proposed change would be in violation of the Building and Zoning Ordinances of the City of "kala , The petitioner appealed to this Board, and on November 14, 1960 at 7:30 p,m, in the office of the Inspector of buildings, City Hall* Salem, a meeting of the Beard of Appeal was held pursuant to notices mailed postpaid to, the petitioner, the abutters arad others, and as adver- tised in the 8vaem. Lvening News oil October 19 end 24, 1960. Attomey Barry 31mon .appeared for the is titioner and ' st t 00 that the petitioner had purchased the property nine months ego,, that he made extensive repairs and Improvements, that `thee cost of said respire and improve- ments eroatly axp66de'd the mount, eaat mated by hien at tine time of pi4rohase,, and that the income from the tato apartmento dares riot permit hire to carry thio property' profitably, No One appeaarel in opposition and several neighbors wed ,.'buttes appeared .in favor, After due consideration thereof,, the Board, by a unanimous urate of all five members present and voting, on the grounds that the -proposed change is aaak6d to Alleviate a hardship "Upon- the petitioner, and. that the granting of this appeal will not* substantiallychange the nature and character of the area* APPEAL O1RANTg13, hoard of Appeal. ,�/.�, ; Secaetary - J CITY OF SALEM APPROPRIATION DEPT. BOARD OF APPEAL Services PAY TO Name Dolores E. Labrie Street 237 Essex .`street city.......... ?!?.l.a.i11.r..............................State...._...".'!.'?4.P,........... I Pur.Order Invoice i Discount Net c erieal servi.res lOU.00 i i j i' I I ?� TOTAL 100.0c Enclosed please find cheque in payment of your account. For additional information please contact the department involved. March 28, 1961 To .His Honor, Francis X. Collins, Mayor The Honorable City Council Salem, Massachusetts Gentlemen: Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 4, Section 16 of the Revised Ordinances of Salem, Massachusetts, 1952, the Board of Appeal herewith submits its report and a summary of -decisions rendered from March 1, 1960 to November 2 2,1960. 1. Eleanor W. Clarke was granted a permit to alter the third floor of the 2j story 2-family dwelling at 44 Walter* Street to convert into a 3--family dwelling. • March 1, 1960. 2, Roger R. LaPointe was granted a permit to remodel the third floor of the 2'j story 2-family dwelling . at 3 Hancock Street to convert into a �-•family dwelling'. March 17, 1960. 3, Sylvania Electric .Products, Inc . was granted a permit to erect an 80+ x 203T 2-story factory building at r60 Boston Street, May 9 1960. 4. Charlesi ,He. 'McManus was granted a permit to remodel the North, Shore BablesT and Children's Hospital at 75 Dearborn Street to be :used as a comm-aercial school, , and was denied a variance to use the building now used as a nurses' home as a dormitory for the school. May 10, 1960, 5, Salem Housing ;Authority was granted a variance to erect multiple-type dwellings to provide housing for the elderly, at Nichols Street between Boston and Butler Streets, Rune 14, 1960, 6, William J. Murphy and Magliore L. Chagnon were denied a permit to erect a frame building over • lot line to serve two property ownera as a garage an one side and a carport on the other. August 29, 1960. • 7. David doggin was granted a permit to convert a portion of the porch at the front of a 4-family dwelling at 300 Lafayette Street into a real estate office, with conditions. November 22,1960. 8. uJlliam K. Lazarakis was granted a permit to remodel the third floor of a 2'* story 2-family dwelling at 23 Andrew Street to provide for an additional apart- ' mento November 22, 1960. Respectfully submitted, BOARD OF APPEAL BY es . ® n, Secretary 'r� C CITY OF SALEM, MASS. CITY CLERK'S OFFICE ------------------April-142--------------1961--- -dames--F:--Tobin---------------------------------- DEAR SIR: You are hereby notified that you have been appointed Member of the Board of Appeal ------------------------------------------------------------------- of the City of Salem for the term of----------------3-----------------------year s ending ------------May_-1..--146-i-------------------------------------- Please call at your earliest convenience and take the oath of office. Ve lespectf ly Af —ff - - - ------ ---- Oath of Office Administered on ---- ------------------------------------------------------- City Clerk. August 1, 1961 DECISION. Joseph J. Clarke 13 Nursery Street The petitioner applied for a permit to remodel the third floor of the two and one-half. story two-family dwelling located 'at 13. Nursery Street to convert into a three- - family dwelling. The Inspector of Buildings refused the permit as the proposed change would be in, violation of �p the Zoning and Building Ordinances. A The petitioner appealed to this Board, and on July 319 y i 1961 ,e. 7:30 p.m. in the office of the 'Inspector of -' Buildings, City Hall, Salem,, a meeting of the Board of • Appeal was held pursuant to notices mailed postpaid to the petitioner, the abutters and others, and as advertised in the Salem Evening News on July T and July 10,, 1961. Mrs. Joseph J. Clarke appeared in behalf of her husband, the petitioner, and submitted a statement of present income and operating expenses, and stated that it would not be possible to, maintain this property on a profitable basis without additional income. No one appeared in opposition, After due consideration there,pf, the Board by a unanimous vote of all five members, .on' the grounds that the proposed changes are asked to alleviate a hardship upon the 'petitioner,. and that the granting of this permit would not substantially , change the nature and character of the area. APPEAL GRANTED. Board of Appeal By Sear©tart' • September 12, 1961 DECIBIONl idward J. Arzigiap 237 Highland Avenue The petitioner applied for a permit, to erect a building for bowling alleys at 257 Highland Avenue and, was reused by the Inspector or Buildings as the proposed construction would be In violation of the Building Ordinance, The petitioner appealed to this Board#` and on September 6# 1961# at 7e3 p.m,„ in the office of the inspector of Buildinge, city Rall Salem.# ,a meeting of. the Board of Appeal was held pursuant to the .notices mailed postpaid to the petitioner # the abuttGre and others, Attorney Jos* h P," Laft ice of Sal:em,, Ronald Keith# l2. Main street, ' Byfis@# a1 d a Mr, slaw representing the Now England Erecting Company, 'appeared in behalf' 6f the pet9tioner and explained to the Board t'ha the,`planc submitted to the Building Inspector called for conatructlon of-' a building designed for • twelve bbwl.ing alleys, the structure to be of mono-panel walls, galvanized steel dock roof with 1j" fibre glass insulation, exterior galvanized curtain wall with inaulationo# genoral building steel frame columns and treaitles, concrete floor. ' and ln.terior provided with automatic sprinkleraro, Attorney Joseph Po McKay ©f Salem appearedfor- Alfred Charland; an abutter, in opposition, and furnished the Board with a petition signed by residents. 'of Higrlead Avenue, objecting to the Prectiou' .of a bowling alley. He stated that Mr. Ch6rl,endee objection was the close proximity of the proposed building, which, according to the plans submitted, Was twat feet from the lot line. It was agreed by the petitioner that new pians would be filed showing the proposed building a m nSmun of seven and one-half Beet rrom the lot line in accordance with the provisions of the Building Ordinance. After due consideration thereof, the Board, by a unanimous vote of :four members present and voting, on the grounds that the granting of this appeal would riot substantia'! ly. derogate from the puxp ossa and intent of the suiming Ordinance. APPEAL ti TEDD Soar d of Appeal Septemberi V , .961 DMISION1 Peter A. Kence 5 Cedararest Avenue The petitioner applied Por a permit to alter the single dwelling at. 5 Gee nrcrest Avenue to be occupied as a two- family dwelling, and was refused by the Inspector of Buildings as the proposed chAnge would be in violation of the ?Aning Ori1nance, The petitioner appeaaled to this Board, and on September 189 1961 at 7 30 p,ra, In Vie offioo of the Inspector of Buildings, City Hall$ Salem, a meeting of the Board of Appeal was held pursuant to notices mjiled postpaid t the petitioner, the abutters and others, And as advertised in the Salem, Evening :News on Augixst. 26 and .213, 1.961, Attorney Philip J, Durkin appeared in be'aaalf of the puti.tioner and expla'n5d c3ir the dwelling consists of nine rooms with • five rooms and baton on the first ,floor and four rooms with bath on the second :floor , Haat �t Kitek:en sink std at elGtttric ravage nould '7e i:nstnllmd Qat t-ie second floor, that there would be no physica chn age to the e;xterlor of the dwelling; that. the petitioner is sLxt7-;nine years of rgej has boor. seriously Ill sand is atttables to raturn to wsrk, Bind that granting of.the permit would rel-.leve at physical PnC menta:.x as weli as financial hardship. He furtbGr atetod t>tat ten .familie s in the .area bad been consulOd .and none opposed the prof sed variance, After--due considsar=atfon tbereof., the Boated, by a unanimous vote of all five members presennt rnd vot£ng-, an the grounds that the p oposed cbmge would «11etvtate: a hnrdohip, would not : ubatantiaa;.ly change the mature rMd th,,ir netesr of the area, and that the granting �of the permit would riot: su'betantiaally derogate from the intent of the Ordfazance, APPEAL. G#?R?3i'Me cnI L( Hoard of Appeal. ;3ecrat+azy • October 30, 1961 DECISION: David Wong 516 Loring Avenue Thepetitioner applied for a permit to erect an addition to an existing restaurant at 516 Loring Avernae and to use adjacent land for parking areas, and was refused .by. the inspector of Buildinge as the proposed change would be in violation of the City of Selem Zoning Ordinance. The petitioner applied to this Board„ and on October 23, 1561, at 7r.30 p.m* in the office of the Inspector of Buildings, City,9611, Salem, a meeting of the :Board of Appeal was held pursuant to notices mailed postpaid to the petitioner, the abutters and ot`iers, and as advertised in the Salem Evgntng Newd on September 2S and October 28, 1961, Attorney Philip Strcma appeared fon' the petitioner and Wormed the Board that the petitioner had been in business at this location for several years and because of the growth of hit business it was necessary to expand. He further stated that V)a property adjacent thereto had been idle for about four years &nd it was the intention of the petitioner to demolish the existing dwelling- and to erect an addition to the existing' reataurarnt buildirng, and that demolition of the dwelling and ereetton of an addition, plus enlarged parking areas would result in a eabstauntial improvement of the area. Upon due considerwtion thereof, the Board, by a unanimous vote of all five members present and voting, on the grounds that the pr oposed change would not substantially derogate from the intent and purpose of the Ordinvaca, and that denial of the proposed variance would create a practical difficulty and unnecessary hardship to the petitioner, authoritee the Inspector of Buildings to Issue said permit. VARIANCE GRANTED& Hoami of Appeal a. �e . eere ary November 15,; 1961 D C SXOH$ Armand Ri Maio 33 ftZol Stroo t She petitioner applied ter a pexesit to rModel the two and oaneaabalf story, twp*PfAM117dwollIng at 33 Hatol street co Into a t1mosfiory three-family dvolling* and was refused bY the XROPOOtOr Of B7,tS"L�S'1nSS 08 the PI't3POD,4 t3hMSO Would be In vlo aation of the Zorain and BU1141AG OrdiaaesnGOD Of the City of Saa.lemo baa paatitioner ngponle4 to this ftaard# and on 11ovombor 13, 1961 at 0000 p»'x v In the offloo of Me Impootor of Dulldinga, Glty HaaUp_ Stabs# as MOOtIUS of the Board of Appeal, was hold pursuant to noticea maallesd to the potitioner,, the abutters and otherair and as advertised In the Salem ftening %tuts on October, 16 and 23ew 1961,9 The petitioner Informed the 0oard that he bad paha od the property a year and a half aa€os that hes wished tso e-o vort the third floor to a four-room aapnrta ant to provide sddltional tMOOM.:a,. 33sa one . 4ppaarW in oppooftUara{ After dual tonsideraation thereofo the Board, by to ueaaaa lmouas Vote # all, mcmbors v*tJA%a on the (rounds that the proposed change would eemfl,i.at 4iih the spirit of the 70ni g and Building Qrdinaanooss and that It does haat appear that this► is a ease where tho Board may dispense with tete application of said ordinasnoont or a ease where a litoral. Interpretation thesr6olf results In manifoot inlustloay Offirmo the refuasaal of the lospoctor of Suildingat AMAL M, UDo le Board. or Appeal November 15, 1961 Re ; Olive Pelletier 25 Grant Road The petitioner applied for a permit to convert a single-family dwelling into a two-family dwelling at 25 Grant Road, and was refused by the Inspector of Buildings as the proposed change would be in violation of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Salem. The petitioner appealed to this Board, and on November 13, 1961 at 7;30 p.m. in the office of the Inspector of Buildings, City Hall, Salem, a meeting of the Board of Appeal was held pursuant to notices mailed to the petitioner, the abutters and others, and as advertised in the Salem Evening News on October 16 and 23, 1961. Attorney Joseph P. McKay appeared for the petitioner and informed the Board that she had purchased this property • twenty-two years ago, that she lived with her daughter on the first floor, and that there are three rooms and bath on the second floor. Mr, McKay explained the proposed alterations providing for a rear sundeck with stairway as egress for second floor apartment. He further pointed out that there are four two-family dwellings on Grant Road. A petition favoring the vnriance, signed by several neighbors, was presented to the Board. No one appeared in opposition. Decision was deferred until petitioner files revised plans showing enclosed stairway at the rear of the dwelling. • CITY OF SALEM APPROPRIATION DEPT. BOARD OF APPEAL ITEM Services 1 PAY TO Name Dolores E. Lahrie Street 237 Gssex Street city.............`n.a Pr.n.............................state..__.Nlgs;�.t.......... I l Pur.Order Invoice Discount Net Clerical services ";:100.00 r' TOTAL 100.00 Enclosedplease find cheque in payment of your account. For additional information please contact the department involved. CITY OF SALEM APPROPRIATION DEPT. BOARD OF APPEAL ITEM Expenses PAY TO Name ,Tames F. Tobin Street 237 Essex street CCit Salem, Masa. ity............................................................state...._............................ Pur.Order Invoice Discount Net Subscription, 7oninB Bulh tin, stamps, stamped envelopes 25.00 TOTAL 25.00 F Enclosedplease find cheque in payment of your account. For additional information please contact the department involved. CITY OF SALEM APPROPRIATION EPT• BOARD OF APPEAL TElY,Services PAY TO me Dolores E. Labrie treet 237 Es-uex Street Sale-"'J' Mass. ty............................................................State.............._.................. Pur.Order Invoice Discount Net Clarical services 0225.00 � ly� TOTAL .0©. Enclosedplease find chequeur in payment of yoacro t. For dditional information please contact the departmentnvolved. CITY OF SALEM APPROPRIATION DEPT. 110 ' D ,011 !,PP`PL ITEM �.=:"J su£ 4� PAY TO Name of J"n,'w s F. Tobin Street 237 -sox tits©Bt 'i City......... Ci... ?nT................................3tate........'lass. i i i I Pur.Order Invoice Discount Net r .;ubocription, ^oning 3u11 mt:i.n. 10.00 foci, of 11 naing uoa 00 15.00 ;t2..Iped onielopc:s 4.65 „otebook payor _.._. .29 4 '. ^ 29.94 TOTAL Enclosedplease find cheque in payment of your account. Fox additional information please contact the department involved CITY OF SALEM APPROPRIATION DEPT. :.3U:RD D '.c P AL TENT :)cry7cQ`3 C` PAY TO ame 1 i�pplar )c �. L^aria treet ?l7 strt)ot a . . ...3 qty.................. t... .....?. ..'...............................State..... Pur.Order Invoice Discount Net Clerical 30;.—Tices 175.00 �i TOTAL nclosed please find cheque in payment of your account. For ditional information please contact the department involved. April 2', 1962 To His Honor,' Francis X ' Collins, Mayor The Honorable City Council lem,' Massachus Saetts Gentlemens Pursuant to. .the provisions of Chapter 4 See. 16 of the Revised Ordinancea of Salem,' Massachuse'tts.#` 19520the Board of Appeal herewith submits its report and a summary of decisions rendered during the year 1961. le Joseph J. Clarke was granted a permit to remodel the third floor of the two and one-half story,' t wo-family dwelling at 13 Nursery Street to convert into a three- family dwelling,' August 1, 1964 2p; Edward Jr Arzigian was granted a permit to erect a ♦ 1 building for bowling alleys at 257 Highland Avenuee. SOI September 12,, 1961• 3 Peter As Kence wasE r9,nted a permit to salter the � single dwelling at 5 Cedarcrest Avenue to be occupied as a two-family dwelling,' September 27; 1961♦ !E. David Wong was granted a permit to erect an addition to an existing restaurant at 516 Loring Avenue and to use adjacent land for parking areas. October 30, 1.961, 5• Armand R.' Blaals was denied a permit to remodel the two and ons*half story, Wo-family dwelling at 33 Hazel Sheat into a three- stony, three-family dwelling, November 15,, 1961. Respectfully submitted, BOARD OF APPEAL amen Tobin, Secretary April 10, 1962 DECISION: Mrs. Gerard Cote 388-390 Essex Street The petitioner applied for a permit to remodel the dwelling at 388-390 Essex .Street from six apartments to nine apart- ments, and was refused by the Inspector of Buildings as the proposed change would be in violation of the Building Ordinance. The petitioner appealed to this Board, and on March 19, 1962 at 7 :30 p.m, in the office of the Inspector of Buildings,. City Hall, Salem, a meeting of the Board of Appeal was held pursuant to notices mailed postpaid to the petitioner, the abutters and others. The petitioner appeared and informed the Board of the current • operating expenses and present income, and outlined the pro- posed changes. It appeared that the existing three-story wooden dwelling containing six apartments exists as a so- called "non-conforming use" - it would not meet with the requirements of the present day building ordinance; that to remodel this building for additional apartments would in accordance with the Building Ordinance, further aggravate this condition. Decision was deferred pending further consideration. On April 4. 1962 at 7:30 p.m., after further consideration thereof, the Board, by a unanimous vote, all members voting, on the grounds that the proposed change would conflict with the spirit of the building laws, and that it does not appear that this is a case where the Board may dispense with the application of the Building Ordinance or a case where a, literal interpretation thereof results in manifest injustice, affirms the refusal of the Inspector of Buildings . APPEAL DENIED. Board of Appeal Secretary • June 260 1962 DECISIONS David Wong 516 Loring Avenue The petitioner applied for a permit to erect an addition 201 x 75* to an existing restaurant at 516 Poring Avenue and was refused by the Inspector of Buildings as the pro- posed change would be in violation of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Salem;. The petitioner appealed to this Board, and on June 18 1962 at 7930 p,m, in the office of the Inspector of Buildings, City Tull, Salem, a meeting of the Board of Appeal was held pursuant to notices mailed to the petitioner, the abutters and others, and as advertised in the Salem Evening News on May 23 and 28, 1962. Attorney Philip Strome appeared for the petitioner and explained the proposed addition would be used to enlarge the kitchen and provide an enclosure for the rubbish and garbage which is now on the outside of the existing restaurant. Attorney David T. . Doyle appeared in behalf of several abutters in opposition, and submitted a list of 114 signatures of persons protesting the granting of a variance in this cases. After due consideration thereof, the Board dismissed the petition without prejudice.. Boa=fe By Secretary i juno 26,E 1162 lxo patit lonm applied for sa Po Galt to ore et a a0ar port & j Cherry Stroot and V as Vlf* 404 bY ttaa TnGP0ctcar Of Duil4inGO no the proposed o0notrucat8.artr vould be In violation of th* Ba id:� Ott ,mCe of ttaea pity of pct&ate: Step patina r a'p%waajed. to thle * ant as 4ftMo IS# 1962 at S;0G p#m* .jA than offer of t laapactor o ilm,10,, a Weat IAS of the twd of APPOU3, a%uaa ha d x+aataaa`at tG notleoo malled to the p atlt;€mapro, t e> at atto ata and othwa*, The petitic ar oxplained tiaat the N and oar tort vould h4ve7 an aaluazlWha top oupported by attol bvaa0*a*" An aWt4mry Wbort: Roy, peaarod L� ca�a3#�a�� Ab��sat$t to the OU66 prOXIMIty of the I'"aaod structure to his 'tesr" dean as ldearAti*U tahOV60i`t tear¢ 80aa,vgo a taaa3 at e vate# all as era ttft3aa 0 on the , Sa do aiat ttaa va pop Chonge would tawri.itta *Attu tf* aap i.t gat tho "atai.?»cliw asrasa, and haat it; dopa not 4pe ar that; this Is ae1,8a whores tb 80cmd w4y diopmo as wit" the a Tic;.at Ioa dr the Seaildi OA-dinaaoco =ar a case thore a litoral interpretation auto th raof resaallts in Manifest iaao�aaatjooie saffirm a the vafu sa of the d s�P Apgsda3 ' dcSx'4 'az°y July 9j 1962 DECISI9Ni Leonard Levy 1.89 Loring Avenue Thepetitioner applied for a permit to use the. building at 199 Loring Avenue as a photographic a tudiog 4md was refused by the Inspector of Buildings as the proposed change would be in violation of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Salem, said property having been formerly occupied by a restaurant as a non-conforming use in a single residence district. The petitioner appealed to this Board# and on July 9, 1962 at 700 p m# in the office of the Inspector of Buildings, City Halls Salem# a meeting of the Board of Appeal was held pursuant to' notices mailed to the petitioner, the abutters and others and as advertised In the Salem Evening News on June 4 and 21, 1962; Attorney William He K. Donaldson appeared for the petitioner and explained to the Board that the premises would be used as a photographic studio only, that nothing would be sold other than. f rames for the photographs, that an existing shed and fan would be removed and the building cleaned up and made more attractive, Two residents of the area appeared in opposition and one t in f avor, After due consideration thereof, the Board, by a unanimous votes all members voting, on the grounds that the proposed use would not be more detrimental or objectionable to the neighborhood, but in fact would be an Improvement over the former use, authorisea the Inspector of Buildings to iseue said permit, APPEAL GRANTED, Bdard of Appeal .� rx;A J " tel , July 10, 1962 DECISION: Salem Hospital 71 Highland Avenue The petitioner applied for a permit to remodel the third floor of a two-family dwelling at 71 Highland Avenue, to provide for an additional apartment, and was refused by the Inspector of Buildings, as the proposed change would be in violation of the Zoning and Building Ordinances of the City of Salem. The petitioner appealed to this Board, and on July 9, 1962 at 8 :00 p.m. in the office of the Inspector of Buildings, . City Hall, Salem, a meeting of the Board of Appeal was held pursuant to notices mailed to the petitioner, the abutters, and others, and as advertised in the Salem Evening News on June 23, and 25, 1962. Attorney James E. Farley appeared in behalf of the petitioner and informed the Board that the proposed alterations would make available housing for members of the Intern and Resident Staff of the Salem Hospital. He further explained that the �. interns and residents are furnished housing at no charge for i rent, and it is necessary for the performance of ther res- ponsibilities for medical care at the hospital, for them to live on the hospital grounds. No one appeared in opposition. After due consideration thereof, the Board, by a unamimous vote, all members voting, on the =grounds that the proposed change would not substantially derogate from the intent and purpose of the Zoning and Building Ordinances, and that denial of the proposed variance would create a practical difficulty and unnecessary hardship to the petitioner, authorized the Inspector of Buildings to issue said permit. VARIANCE GRANTED. Board of Appeal By. (Copied 10/18/62, from Building Inspector's copy in his files. ) s July 100 1962 DECISION: lshkan Zorabedian 198 Loring Avenue The petitioner applied for a permit to convert the grocery store at 198 Loring Avenue into a beauty salon, and was refused by the Inspector of Buildings as the proposed alteration would be in violation of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Salem, the proposed use being a change from the previous non"conforming use in a single-residence district* The petitioner- appealed to this Board, and on July 9, 1962 at BOO p m. in the office of the Inspector of Buildings, City hall, Salem,, a meeting of the Board of Appeal was held pursuant to notices mailed to the petitioner, the abutters and others and as advertised in the Salem Evening News on June Z and 21, 1962, The petitioner explained to the Board that he was living at this address with his family., that he wished to use the grocery store on the first floor* as a beauty salon,, to be open six days a week from 9 a.mt to 6 p m*s and that he would 'be assisted by his wife and one employee* After due consideration thereof, the Board dismissed the appeal without prejudice.. Board of Appeal d ^ By =1i Y.i k .} #.{J 4 t t. r / ,f.:. a k)r ar.. ! y. xr.. .♦.{ ! ani 4-. 'x { #'R 3 'i'!.t'} [ .`+ - *..*.. ai.i t } 'T 8k #Y. q + y ♦ :Y.s is i $,}ti:� 'd,' R - M « ,i i ♦ y,# #5.'R i±E.lili•i rF'1 ? {' #�'J /. ,Y ro:a k . J 4 n♦ b,r # 1 1..$ a }}. err } .'t #4 f:^' • �, ♦... { ida+ 3r. •. c ,.A i + fr s-x # a 'a 4 #.t•+ i -} 1 / xi Efp.. -'i1 ti 'x� x ! _ / Y' _��.a •'4" ri'yt 4S' al4j Al #:I 6'4' 1 i 9 a M 4:a !'.> Y � .'S �* �r,Dl F'fE i,♦ • . ..Jt i# i iL. { : ♦ { p. w } +:•+ a M# . .# sa.. p.R ' S.' # js s, ♦ .-s E #.J • }i s { i•. •'.."• \ � i# e. t 1.+ .i't.. wt. i s2s ' -.�\ � 9 #JJ �}.' 1 r w ##!• 4.' aT 'iu'.• dY, Yf $ .') ES Y i# � - a 4�J Y'Ei. mew •.• 1 } !'.# 'Y -.s i N'i k al w, f l.s:.H 1./ 6 # a .# 21MT.j8 a r.- i iri 'Y a 'R.x' / a 8'* 3 f#. ♦ - c.{' +F #�i '^ • .{ w.�';wi�J � �-;+ .4• .��, .ib Ra s ii.> }. i'az .r r#. c:-v4.,# i +'s ' { ff1+4' Y. i ;!J t vAi a {Ea. f ! t 'E y'Y :4 iii • ai/ fib` b 'o: / Mtb m � �.:4 YI 't .4 .3a } +{ t'F} ki.y . eM1I. R. r lsl Y _• } •. . y .{ k •:}♦ `. '.. i x'. 'r €# } . r a {# ii i t <.x, .s. T.. Y e r •,. hh { ..♦ c , ,. xt s' t w, is { ,.. x a t i Tt • �. 4;16 i {k,.i { 4 ;♦ t..# } 4iS .k { .. #t sxs•#'Yx ^ es,. tiF'.} a a' a.. ta .. Ek >sarA e'. ,{ ♦ � .,�..a ±t R J1 a ,4' a i k. #ilaahP 'r >' • a a iF. i1a e • x �e s-t i t YI i d' i {r.`�Y. k { r November 6, 1962. } DECISION: Salem Housing Authority Dunlap and School Streets.. The petitioner applied for a permit to erect multiple-type dwellings to provide hoUsibgfor the elderly, on land at the corner of Dunlap and School Streets, and was refused by the Inspector ,of Buildings, as the proposed construction would be in violation of Zonlrg and Building Ordinances, , inasmuch as these areae are zoned as two-family residence districts. The petitioner appealed to this Board# and on November 5, . 1962,. at 8:00 P.M. in the office of the Inspector of Build- ings City Hall, Salem, a meeting of the Board of Appeal was held pursuant to notices mailed to the petitioner, the tie abutters and others, as advertised in the Salem Evening News on October 13 and 200 1962, Robert E. Gauthier appeared for the Salem Housing Authority., and outlined the plan of the proposed project. While Sev- eral people .appeared and inquired as to the plan of the project, no one appeared in oppoti*ion. A After due consideration, the Board, by unanimous vote of all five members voting, on the grounds that the proposed variances do not substantially derogate from the intent and purpose of the Ordinances and that it would result in direct beneRit to the City and that denial of the proposed variances would create a practical difficuhty and unnecessary hardship and that the proposed variances would not- substantially change theimpact of the area, authorizes the Inspector of Buildings to issue said permit and grants said variances. VARIANCES GRANTEDO C � 2 Board of Appeal BY .ice Secretary ♦ f # : Y !. kk: 't.*.i, .. Y e : N... !, h.♦ pY. 'T ffi d V w.Y. 'F. Ird * * }}' r r Y=+^ :♦ r + . _.. .d `'Y'f !* s.R'k;rrr i+:' r• P 3t�. ,. x= .: F a'a a e! * *+r1 x-Y L.Y. F f.sat "*+F :ti F .,Na;rt R«Y� -# a : 4 •.M Y ..p .'4 M * Y,t'•a:e a - 1w • -.♦d F ` ! d #_.} 8..�: e.v i {: .3 .#2l. * . � a.. ¢M a i f :* �4 ?:3�t # #•# zrY • .�M P -_.d AM -{ ' * :i * t i .:' +.�'t * ` *'. e.. ,.a. d, lxa+,a , a-+ +n.T yv. t m *+ • .} - #'x Fw* * + .a as 3Y *pr:t tw }.,. * ,A=*y.F. xr ii Y. '. ** !:J t �-+➢,Y! d a2..s At« -�.f " wee :a d w ♦ � *'r # !.':d � !�' ♦iM� ' s. O"+d' 3 i-4t•). a.. &* a *+ it t.'+ t *+♦ d:. # S a *-* x +'.a ♦ - 'r s•A a d + *"..•, v E ++WTIVET ^➢ #. w.eE ' *,a :. lrEa. "q.�« Y Y *' t•a 'SfY+s l,f. :'i �. 3'.'w p� Y`d.. i r::t-:e' b #�1ti� ;4 a5Y-#. 3. 1 F.•a* 1 -h ♦ , r : ie f # ; d tAT,Y`t`o- fY"tl ', s } 'N # '. } 4v ,l, 4.e w * YF`}:r w*• •. '.:t..# fiw..: yvi 3 ♦ t':,+} ie:.aa 'Lr s.'• «- .a. }J r',* w' * * Y - + f #sdY K.F.+ 3 ♦5' }.. a: 1 �J:d 'M+I b * !'+. 31 -*W'f^Fa� � #i.. * 3 d. + i• a a,+F..�t ,tfJ :. t F{♦ tr' t * ^'P-p. "f� a+N - �r1* S +. t R:x�:".' 1r t e... � *'.Y tt}# ,xr 3 *'"i *. ', Y 4� k •�. !.. d r'*.Nx *t1Y - .A # • R.s rr d 'R^Y J e F p�RyE.'4 P Y -.v• k Y:# J: M`A al ":.d. Yi�"r„t�.,.. R e y.3. , 1'3 . + � i '! • !' # , ' v..9 lYfr 1. .-f+.+7*. �.t A A+� r35 *F 3..• }* �Y-#'y;�f�' ,* :f li.r,t fa d Yd- -wNr w,Y♦. s �, i aw ¢ t #.f.'M'-d ' i:.7' S; �' D.L + S � E : 3 + y: f a r VI r� •J'�.. E '.i t i ia# 'i d' CM- 3'a f4 $4 %. .A.'. E ;.k 3 .f .�kr f . "i'k i'. :g 7#t' � r :•r' A � a � f � @'E - i1t d #. ik + ;. , S Y : A R 1t t 't -S d Y F a i'9'•Y' S . C U 9 t'; d ' t f r' f r' w .k• `'v r mi i x # ' x r rr' .s 'a. a - k g .e E. s ,.' a.. ; '3 t{i C ' di ffi& -E.•, r �# ' ",i v ffi.' r € - f t Y 3 3.t i r 8.4 # % Y. T d 4 Rd - - ' >8'f a..f' � z s r ti k .s i - '.: .r • a � � ati r t .a +e: � >F � ?iM'9F s.� f< * ,�. s •a'.. E» x .'Y: },s �. :r.f r R� i i - a x s -t`4E rsrt _k r"a :f 1s . : ed,�. i a• 4}Arr f. kik ' sr' +.i. -.'E •• �, f r f"t ...� t .'k 'ori»;s. : & f rad ak � s �`s arr :f• �8 - - $y �Id . K z.4 d t. " W1R : •R f4 .;. -.d is k f ', f 4 -. ' r ! r-+/ �fks -rvl M1t ,as • « *i # s A Vf ' 4 : i RIP- t C-t; . r January 15, 1963. �g a Doyle DECI9ltltis Clan' re L Callahan 2446 Orsbortse 5tre es# te The petitioner applied for a permit to convert h three—stor four4famsily wood f�^Me dwellingmat tar.26 Osborne street into e emvets«frim ly deamllgA, with t as spartr aant& on the first floor# three apaartmen 9 on the +socond floor# and one apart— ment on the third floor#. This petition was refused by the Inspector of Buildinga ad the proposed change# would be in violation of the City of sales Zoning and Building Ordinances* The petitioner appealed from this decisions and requested a variance to Chas al, and BuIldinsn 9� cesr The petitioner ayapealed to the 1�axd caf Appeal. © iss the of�'iee of the Tna actor of Bsail.dings3s City t9ail# �al.ess�s bTaseet .#. a meestissg of the ard, of A al hglds pursuant to moticbs maiiasd to the p®titioner hls Caatterss and athera, and as •�`-v. advertised in the sW.em Evenitsg �ates can December 2�s and x9� 196 , Attorney 4ohn FQ 4#Leary* act on behalf of the petitioners Claire Ls Callahan# appeiresd be ore the Board to outline the reason for the proposed alterations* He pointed out to the Board that a considerable amount has already been expanded for covering the external walls of this dwelling with aluminum sidings and in view ofthe fact that considerable work :Fie still to be done on the InterSors. the re fit s from the existing four families would be iaasufi'aasient to carry the house,# and would result in a definite hrardahipa, He oleo pointed out this dwelling was in a deplorable, run down condition# and an opportunityto redevelop this property , would be of definite improvement in tneighborhoods and a more Advantageouas #asset; to de City from a tap standpoi nt o Numerous neighbor tiara thiar vicixity aslapeared before# the Hoard in favor of gft Ing the variances together a th 16 petiticarss filed with the &sand of Appe#sl by people 1n the vicinity who a in favcar of granting an exception to the Ht ding send Zonis Ordinances in Chia partimulear ceases No case app ed at thins public hearing its apposition to this pe— tition• A£ r due considerations Claes Hoard with all members present# voted four in favor of granting the petition# and one membar ctppooad. The majority of the Board felt that the proposed � - J g pooinlont Claire L. Callahan 2446 Osborne Street rrariance � not ,a�isatsntAally daro�;ate they Anted and ggu�pa�ao o;� tk�a 09ty eat' 881om �'��sa� a� Cosa t'�doea� ' havAt� An s�And that the �eve�n asnesl].ar e�rtr�anta �aocld acce>m- • tete lea& peoplm t2sets �ea�r laarge tenento these cow e3t3:8t o Howsver* this variance is granted on the condition that the interior center stairwells have the wooden laths and plaster replaced with .rock loth and plaster throughout Arora they first floor to the- underside ,o ' the ceilin Of the gird floor. mei applies to the two again stairWA# to staixr y to tha cellar must ,be enclosed Ars a similar mer. This variance is also tiho peetEitioneerr bbcondition le ooppen���� Rene ask ar c r floe '"—nontowned a In this dwelling* VA�MM GRAMIN HOARD Of ANAL; 'Uedretimli q'. cit 0"06"0 suo ► teaoff' ►+� �� of � erftswnaoO � ip4904 au OpwtvAsto to at" ! l# PAW baAa Wlle4 for a 6Wt to orw% w aMtka U tap=j"t 41M: Orr • Alyft� J-*, 5t * to _ i . tGet 400 pct Y Vii. a vprLm= to t lw �I 404 # � I mm rt � Zro- U*ift AVOW itto 4990ty bAlmtsaft"d Jay 9# 1 i i Am OMOt 4to bo two 00 a wisoft to 4m ase X� mo to pvow aid nvowmv 3* 1962* S"If '� 41, b ' d**Up" mwx A � I • �Ytw($ _.:�- 4% ';:A e - i;.t x 1:4 ".t Yt '-YE4•R:�4 �.4 �'i�+ac.D �''�ti1 a ,. L.4:_. .:.: 1. •. 4 !. f.,t. 4'Y ♦ :i 4 ., •� a a:b r s rx p., 'r . ;: ¢-. ,.'`.t p,, a .. < {; 4n.�t a• s 'e x 1.M t x .a D� " Y: :a a i)✓, 9 'R aa' a a !a 'h tit F q K;; $„�'� s'4Jf!": e.t ' a 's a ♦ '.t ..Sao- r k;t ✓.6L �'. k t:.cD k F W 'moi'_ I tV TFtir: . n,• "` 2'i4 - N.a.N'#k'-0'. . t• k:A. lit N f.. .i.. . ... r e..4 :. K ki 4.Y:."r r :F.a A..':sr.'.". :'y# .J i,s t'b c: z.:ro:s; f r t,c y.a D .. .:• ,a,r Fn SSp ♦y '"S i'ia. C.:. �"Y !'. i i cnt :.. v4'Nt ti 4. } 4 f '+"a Y t { i 5 i, f. k.a.6 3 ; '.A • t"-r eA i s .iM : f a i .t'. }:a Y •: a F.a ,r.+ 4 +•'. '� a x =Fere t .. r .r :S n`.k -t- if a4. ?"t 3 itii.• x 1 : -.'4j ari ` !#s.A>a Ysn ",k A x • s'cY... ,e<i..4.3K f +i #> Y # A a.Y "t- :i' . .�t R.h ...:i oA Y nzz"s.:..: t. .}.x .� •�Y! k '# a 'R..:. y.. :t.i. . ba 4,> ' `t.i Tit t � J.=,r n • ,'s �. ,. i4;r...."yae xro..«" i tri'cS ♦ a_y De R ^a.. .4A 4. kai. . 2'r� e"a + a .: s c4 • �f:e f'YA -ro.y:'x,4' .A 1 R T 4R"11 a rA1; > $ t Y'Y` i k n.at jA' S f 't•a t+ i> � �-• }. o-' -`Ks ,iF�`e Sok t`.., 's'! 4 4.Y }.D E x 1♦ ♦ L '. F i`e . '*R Di'Y'S F.f"i •,•} a 4fkF {�.. : -k` k f r1 _ ..� ,.P:i.. ea e... S•id .4e • vi 4:.y tYk4 v. 6 eee. k.+:::..¢ :.. +;. ".n x:k� �> n '+ .d. 'nn, t ;3 a--x• .. ..ro'. P„ a. p.t. A;.,...s $•s a -,+ 4 'ia rn ..:y ts. ,nt..K {:i' ..r r}ao-.4 �•. �4 tat y:. �dt a s 3 � 3 After due eowidoretla4 the OM %M taken UW*r a # tb* ZObUW ftxUaftoo was granted to allow Chatal Tmot to *I * t teat land tatzd� �! �#� qqt i Ttw Daatrita te to 0311+ the Oriftift Of a 0111n on lot: 12A Larch Avom# V`� 14 bind thwt t hlo lots to npen the peri l€nasr. After dw comidoratit tem tto 0104 to Che low b 5 T 7 14a� ftroat , rand due ut 028 at ca: tr ot ��� d fty Viet! Oirele, w d bo l d In isige, to met the of tba, 3 log OrdA ao with"t t4vy g mWr lguIarly rad r" effect or harms t ho, 4 ac+t to i�ar the db Den are e0nomfAs. the WAItsocar#0 ate- qUOMM S OU earn0SItioO t* the ZODU4 Ordlawto lod. DOW OF APAb • a'# ' a;- a ti x': M =' a i.a.5 .. xe�.e• ;SR tx - a �. ......!T4 ® a e«n -eE ?' 9 vex ♦ #,� r' U .# a I a - t * • f �- z Y % v. s. x' E 'e�d a i' Y -. _ � M {. :,-icy`s : a. o .. t 'ii I + .r.' ♦w' w p`a ,.{' : tY. a•'.Y b •�4 4 :�. :a# x ..U' -TH. M' ary ' .. u . # r. I t. P a:S. vu F• 4 n 8 ., .-v £ .7C« '�" t` : .7 }a q, February 2$,. 1903,6:. • It - . - .. �. .... yam. • _ r • y 1 Bo4rd of H$a1.bh, R 5 'goad Street Sa .am, 4ULOA. a . Uciosed please find copy off' the Stotoinos, rpe It ons Gcorge MA-Cabo, 70 WhOh Loon Street, Ulomm, -�aear is attorney for the •pet9tionez . Tou win n6te t1hat in this invtl 1rCit the .A .� aroval,of t *Board tam ticular�t. is required ;J.et cera ofHeal.t2 ` pa # 'fiery truly yours, eGret&ry' . i Februs °y 26, X963+ ' f' - 4 ; •'1 fir. . Y • r ' Attorney George IkCabe ` w 7`10 w" ow Street, Anclosed,pleavo .rind idecision. in stasi.nos petitioner i Uu kil• note that 'tha Beard of • ` % Jteslth is to be notified or, this decd sign. Very truly youwr8, jM JFDcc' Secretary te a: WITION x Mlliott k fAAtt# to aroot a ei les Sam- Aly am-Aly d lling, LM #15 Gr lawn, An# J00oph s, fila Lot contain 96 ataro fe6tM Zoning AlImMu r eb +esgeze Ordimmoa roquim ogm* feat; MMICRt Nr* Ba.11ott llavit t. applied for uperruit to erect a able family dwelling at Lot p aresetaam AVOCAW and w*o retuned by the lnapecter cit L1,61141096 on Iftrt3tY 4,, 1963* The z0ang 01 ia4nce r6quiree a lot, a 7000square fact in tie *M4Zoner 2)y and the petitionorve3 lot comm- iod, 6996 ewe feat* At a maetIng of the Boaard of Appeal on A�rrU 8 . x.963r thed appeal oi" Mro kstdtt hem and tYz a fol owIna. 16 the docialm rotdored by the Board of Appeal:: • Variance gt^an"d on the site of the let• Diatancce to bmzdary linen mast be obaorvads, that is tin feet on citbar sada j and a sate-tack from the street i of fifteen feet* Petitioner cutest subat now plaza embodying the ac ohugga to they Building lneape9ctor Wore pergdt to erect t hic dwellits can be ice+ VA KM CRAMSDr BOARD OP A AL 6L 'ez ,i i F r`! # Uras, Rolm COOVbalo -too* V0710 fto M � f*r a % t o est Ott b O t,U* 'td � 4104MI1108 0 23 Oto of � �as tho. provmd thexca toad W, $b vio"» �+Fto th" 9004 and (M April a 1 6 at 71 Ngo U, the offtto U tho InOPNOtor gftt4ag of of AopixLrl ww bAdt "t to =1014taoa to tho utiarx6r* 4b * ft, om ed U itj=* * . s I�bond tbo fifth :mar b*IM OS t* HOW OP AMA la .0.„ K a 4�F.t'r4a b '. in try 'S+.M q:y' a i•'YXF�� t. .'a.w�.. +.l:-. R#Yvy x #„ r.:.y * �'a .c:e -s•. :.y .i.x a +. fo xt• . .'F..} s r.a.s .�+.a .-Y±tr. •i s ..ws® u.:.;. YA s< .-;yr. 4 y_e' •1v. `•l•Y G'$..^:Rv 4� • 4] r•.. [fiJ T-u'..wY i.Ylk a°P. '�a" YA >..,N,�..', G.Y:a, t. •yy y4 - r,y •,M1f -!. sb _ b mrj 48'_ 4 `, ;s {� ':+: LE 7M P3).Y { 1•.L .y:.: 8,ek, ..d 'f'ex/'. 7.f 77A i T'xSa.R-x�1. i:4F RR.G�e{ ` 4 t:•d r R 4=1�:.+'"i a 1 `Y j.VRe i:M i• - � '�F 'fi c � f.Y't ,ii✓' f .fpb q lif i- R4'fK'i'/e ✓ wlA � -X nJ :S�MyR4 2tt W s.R-w •rvt f..Y �Y Yt { 4• Y. •�f Kk+,. #;9. ti�a�Y K'G! b a -.)Cr +4 Ti,{Q,..? # . �'k'"aM v "aF��. 4ry'+r1• ,1aY. M Fl TrSi.S, G,� !4E !,i +)..4 .N•FEk�'ti . b>r� a'r,_:v. a:t '+r. +i a= 'r ..y^:A+...A i '. #.• 'e, t:ut'. a-�:;t; . +a t:K+4' �" a •v �.#�':. »'s rm $ >"- a nt�is'. �. c#:; c-::ag wits. m• ♦'.:_ .. Krs'F e Y f.:i• �R- q..ke .x'9i i. P§. '. i. 1 a ¢ :'i' - a.-b`j.gy /�;e. xs •, 'r' d ram:'.+e•. s a.un Y:y�K{ � p . ate. r �; '' .., ,t-..,. ,. x, s � Yttz� `.1'.t-A#.,f f♦ b+#1+(.a,. x s�`e a s a' �� i,a e6. ' i4 S1 •WA -AiY <_ < aat. s=:s# a'} a :..{Fg �.esa {c•szi,, : .. :'a m.: s M eta... .. ,'+.•n^ •fi+a a.a?y'. m 4e:i.'4i' «.n+t�; -. :i f4 ,w; 4 '�%•8.., x,f "i � s .:;e: +i$-Y. � x: a :rte t r. K.a.+, n '� '"# . aell ,ii:#ik '(:.L Y'Y Jt i i (�. F:N. 4' .F•'{ '.M ,�. M 4 T >. ',s i FR y . a �: •,{•t. � a f a L•'4 • ' L �'x.a :t �, ,! ;w s'L ,..ay ?a.�t. ♦�: t.w 3 .. . # + . .+ A*n ♦ . .a .1�#' e.s w'.{t A.R s+i •a..k • .K i.R•k +t'.. s t+t ifi y... •• , 'a E t%}fie ti .% 4: :a. .. f i.:. a. ? i '4� sys X A p� n M.Y ♦ 'k r (#. ! a.a %Y it ry Y %:Y :k i " :k '! �.fi n !�'. "X ,�. '{�Ly it ♦ ' S * YVA. d xi a: t a. � A" a, a ! .. f { A'%.. "'Y:P Lf td Y i9 # {kiF t' YI ♦ ." e N '. A' f 'M A u, .Z � e L b 6 t A ! i 0 * # 8. •::M t 4 1 m4:1 Y •S. x lT t. ".# 'M 4- k d s-a d A,R P.k �' *;' 4' I W O O C: 3 -o m D () m r 0 W O O :U C 3 w 'YSti i�F' F=z kiyv'. C' b'W.' Y '1•:. �'�.L•, 0. 'hhi �� 4vp'i �Q. Yf 2..r 4x . . 'fkti °sic ! 4' °-ia `g' E k::« � M b�.. ,.•2. ip5 taa.'+ .p ax .# a Yyi' 8!a R . t•x i:'t. r' :a aps. a .�•.ti. t , . T is t Y♦ ng .5 ! M ':Rid .# .* #, Z.� , p. �; "'..a,. DtFri'.+• tH'� '-'N Y? .:'¢.v- .. nC-TEN . „!� '.vba' ,fi . c .: .k € A x, i°t.. '..+i vim '.. .P •.a_ :`4 e - i' 1 4 't r 't. k. •.3- Wrb !-'2 Ix,VI lF t�F- �. • 'FO. ! '� .. : k 1.,.. '. `t a..dti,2. .M R 'wi i.u..f. - .. .r?'� "1 t, : 'i°a" A'- ay1 .; yy;er.:". 'Y t .II! `Ju. •a J•b 'iws s ♦ � a a. ;.;n ' e'. ,k. ice++.> 3 S _.w Jx. .-,�b S:•+`-.i x Y.e II`t, 1. t y: 3'i . a.ei a Y .as�R '�+ #•+:', ;.a pat r ...'.'. �. F �xw ♦rk A\- r .�r ' .r r� x .. #'..i ♦ k'cc} k "+ Y G+i a�! x i,ar #ti 3 E u �s M .a +}, aY e.: T-sx' � � mid'{ y +ti r ?t r.a:a :.,fi r •roe.A.i..,.,+ 1 �t�l. A A.+r-r 4 '!x" ..,--Y N' .#akT a 1! � F�dta•.f ♦ � k t i� - 1 - k 1 f'+ '.x .p.,+w d w'r,,Y,�� x f «,4'. .' a #f+. #, p !r k,F..,� r y::a..n. t •i txr^a vz~j t,y� _ � t ` k.a a m :♦ • 'l f44�,4- L..y 1.: 'A. .a a: It.+ A.e. A 11t�S -0 f"F .,k++.3 +Ya.� �# �! � #n RF3 `iLa.M1�k`)"l l3i{�e+i 'A t�k h.. �c r,� k s f ; �`. -• �. .. .T, r'.k.3Y. a ' r k. .. < - w:;.i +. ) Nii c'c h, M w�is # M.x- +� .x. �h.a i1F b .L Ai' _. ;f i.. A. .v3fe F "f z( w�:�. ; }..n k�- �4ki W r.l f "ur�t k d�... S M i�> {.�pf -3�, 4t�.4 b'. 3 "Y is `ilk•,rii ' '.i��) P ..R I "x r. r MAt dAP d' A'^l 6' .#S p. ' ..r .res '.r a iy..k a :i '. 'h w. w �s„r'J.v. ww r' swi+a` +�$ .a. +w •�- s+' ' a ','a�Y- 3r d q mt u r yc p�' z s . ♦. - e `Y 6 k<a. + ' '4 . ...x.s. -+_ ♦.+. Mai_: r '.r --/. i� +' a. i'a - A, q i P� `..4 4 --. � . ---. A h ,.kms,+�:i rw� � �� [, a ' ! FM!'.f .. <- .-i iY.. 'Ff ,F tai . %•& '. » } a-q i . F a)t-,...♦ w 7 F t+i. �•a • : a,as a t+a a .-s.x } /. itt . Y *-' + %•ta, Y* � d%�.'a .+', + S.4„ : y s a % Y_� rrk v ++ : s {-k ♦,:. .y4, f # '*'tY. ! R` R k M F,Y. t ti:Y } ii.w.. # i #- q ,k%" }.. . d'R t •M �".� i i' i f tY• •i.• 1 +; aPo � uli I • '{'.d !8 Ynt 4 4. i ♦ % Y to ! J'4':.'i 4-4 F. * #A s-S f t,.- x.a # -. ,, '..Y. 1„ .♦ 4'F{'; { .a .,i Ji '# '81 M' i !'F:itY. 4 +• }' - Ati + iJ-: . i•JI+ ,.. x k ♦L... ♦i. {.fit � 3rY %- #; • ;.;d+F i-% !•• .} tF'J y # .. #.% .'J`:♦: k r :.R 4-d}:- 'L' #•Yt 5 4 '+Y Yy,O A Y.-:e! `! + ,J k- W. f � i'A $+,i i# + .. k k 'F. J Jr 'F •. .wlt % M, ,.D i 'A}fJ YJ '�! i. 'Li }inti`Y wY. , a+r k yr,J•t. Jlk- rF LYY A* y ♦'R 't&P'+^t..i .'J. Lit * A .#4 't'+Y'. F 4 + kt- } ! Y3! 4 Y-4 ;: :- t RY • d•Y 4-i J a k .. + ki + Y .. !.# Y�a •' +'k - t. d'* +# J#Falx %.. Y . ->#.t- A b,3 :ft i .. # i i BOORUM & PEASE " ak-� R" ® BOORUM & PEASE 1 �Othgw tau 1943+ t x'140 e ��x� at aA�o roru;tN4 to1,060 a pmwu p4r tbo az�j Aoa of 0 on remulm fou*, ror Ott Z V*Tt# 7s 4.1* # "V�14 0 ttt an JV00 r. % tzp rot Civy w �. - .* 6 buwft hio otitla r Ift prwood buUdto to of wbod otro4ixtion co a C==Ib to enlit Ow varlm�* en 0000 005"tutaw 2t A m t OMU tbO 4"t* V %WTW* VOM OF lPO. moa a. ' :♦ � :.tiw r,+#x. 41 amu.. g..-' i' 1 ! # r � i A A �' _.1 i ' . 4 "aP } bY; .A - R 'Mi+. .S tl-R'..S M 1F Pa y. .kat. - l � At A �.. H •�'+a€ �:1 # �' k # "i: : k+21 ...t (11 .;+. > d ••Yt M- b aA .+ Y @ j �.#F#Yb ' •+-A j • 3 hr k s..; +} {i i '+Y '. a+ .: • F•+YTFi'C#+' o � .F {�. } *:. �:+W}f 7'tt Ait ". a# { . ;+ sh:x+ ah •�' P . z ,s ' 2. .t +i:a s,R4 _ .i. y. .} _a ,.�) i .0-! f x !•, d'F 'a;r # #F -a.T- a. t a� _' i� f.p 61. �#. Jn d'NR & i,.ro k}�,,1' f rn s 'a.'}4>�' V t � St x a.k.+ s - s a i 'k w•a. � a+Y 1 ♦ ♦ }k +' �M1•• d1 9 i 11 '& �#y ♦ A 4}�.. i j • r" YN k i ,� Y,A X. Y,Ax s A. -fi i'.# #'+,#- f.t }.a, li we fiAi.% #"MM l:.a-! r i.4. 6r+..a. 4. !.. f"-•-.a+ a A v-t '.s a s i•s'` -a. e 3 s• asw�w+ a + + k 9 s t.. k P•r( t {a a! 1 b 0# 4�¢ ii,..f +P'F+. le f t F i ���^., '�1 Vii.:$ � �. �i� �. rr �y+ � m # 1963 Ilb N2 Librw ISI : Alm A* taut - Petition to =*Oct r crpoart at :5 Sertclo Ava€3 . 47 2# 1961# tbo Actlz6 UOptaa for of W141 ro � �, Satic+ aterat " tattatt "CxCGt a,� a �0 Fen `+ t taJua Pr �e � t�� S!'�"�I�t• V b Lu The Patitioner oppooled .rota t doel ais , *ad reg. CMa d ttzc bow*4- of AP a. to grant a vaarl� to Li �UAtittie Of the Zwing lr% araca. ea. g t b* Doak of the Dooff' Appeat g:00 ! °b P0,14 14 the 0VU* of the U c for of BUJUd Room 7, City �ffi Wim, meas., on ttradey# Wit # � 1963. All Fire a abora of the rte term as tat ®t� at to as beaar�sg. ITo one aattrtd � a ls� Ca#t. a* Carrell A �.lt�# an utter aat 27 �rttacc4ca Ave# �] Ira Favor, rs 011or John P.. Bwko append Ata favor And 3:a a* raga crc od* tSt atated be propo a s to pct an bpm Carport# tdth a tooden railing around 00 Woe; tlie roof wUl of Ap"We# all Five =:art votfto to cravat tbo V4r ao tb beeaudo It to to be *a am c t � al etaat'4 above to awt the Petition* VARIAZICS ate. BOARD W APPUL b 0 d d•t a:x -. -- 4. a s;' a, C.4 _ a... rW '. bte ft 4'u Y '3ix:�. 4i W�'x :tcr1Y-♦ $�hh+x x3`' ,.,�Y 'tb.-A,..c ?', :} -.3 V"Y.+1 }rii La�3� i P t 'rR4• 1'" 9¢RiP, r#GFt-G3 * ,� a4x .i} i,'z ,0 '''tl :,Yi' t'♦ ! F #c. e%. n�Aj. {...,xi ft �. an-k k:IrJ a 4i1.-}53 EA i. *Tv;• •. �� ..F Yrs :Y�.. 'a'.L '- , iC ,Y Si Y _'Y{-Ss t:s.ai• a-A. ...` ;'.m �F # i+Si{ i°h sj1 s rt.s- sat y.*v:; n' -�-.a Sa,`a• ,>?• a w,':.a:.'r *.r �. a.q r: ` x+ .rvep +.. emr `Y;q;. #.t': . 1 a� :'.i'* �:za`, ,,.ri i.'.T � -i#' #.€ -'++;W*.'a„.... z•F ="A�. f:.x rY#;: ➢^a,•+r,g � Yj:'max m :. � .ns�' «d. +v" ;`s 4 rste +a'�%-bt• s. �'*g- - y: t.< t.#vrc-aA $ i+:. �.". ➢°e a,v,-k, frssstr- ".�a=:a �e-simc'ai: t »-. .�..e '. +`*i."# ucx:..a + >;A-,4t*k a?n�Y. 'w*,iY;.•.a�,. .t»!k^< d=' :y A< , k'a : s.a ;Y tis �i]?i •.. 1 t�?:T•+ari r.:t: :�I• •-! I"Y , br*..a '.#t+:Y F/a-♦ !.ii. s' *a ;€ r s#b•:..r. s`� p:{R'+ v: ' «•.;,+- xYa A!rt. fs ct..�,. 'e r �-.=c> *'* t+a, . � z,s. k #a" � # tb a>,F _' t;6', - s'. :# v 4•' +a '-. i t a ¢ .# . c ' wA?1u._,. ! . !. b"oS' .. s.P.a•� :.1<y iY., a tR rt t 'fi � *Si•o': cY r::<.+ as t° ;t; rY'3 tY �> �. s 4,ya n'.,•«++•. 7 '#t* , t(... f,+i!+.r ..w -.s."s Y•Y.i�j. wt:... r 'syr >A ' ♦:w?: ; e c aa. •rv$'� £�' ! Y13 Ni.j.t�YY ik is St y.,- ht 3: J t' Y ;,b ♦ Ai fi 0'A:5`' Vv R v4*#�B t} 'Y F A y`Y . t i: u .,+rjt Wtia-- x`n>.sY�.. FA.t .:nr . ..*•� a.?, b,l_.Y*Ya. ' a 9`.x., :�. tr xa �a'r. - 'tra +;i .:{ . ,.. v .' t� t.i 'i:., E r .'-kl:+:, F -.F t :#,jai. +.E >a• n.itx,-y .. �. a�ttt ' �?fa" .1 'y s' "f[ a :to-« P-..a ti,�, v srf: " a iii *R•: ^;,aa '},:w. �: Ras #.i ♦ . #.'� ,* �a`# .i ! Y:.: „Y f•%. # P'» .a•:e i'h+a} M y Y. !.e '% f�9.h.Y k. fSY6,� Re� �* ..� t 4t - d '�- # a # ` A=i a'.�... N * t p :;% a tn. ': sie . '��: f ^at aF:. ' 'f >.f. 'v.R t d « 'Y a. > a ! �.,.��-� f #`' s 4 .•, x a # 3:3 # _- -� * pq.?y a i �� f *�..le4 .tai . 3 •R '4 :#� 'f i i R F f :s .p.w f f 9 Y:# -{ #'' iai.# 9.% �M# alt i* #J � R R w# # # 'a L -P.#T aef.6r E a. ria + i=# fA ".#f #x.. �> i � .f.,�#s# . st3 :f' jf.j Ri � t r ' �♦ ��# ik # E .- :-a R ti. �' . R! R {* k Y I{',R h f Y. f�'a,% - y + � R4 i ` R *.3tdr7�'.. 57� #:S} .E # 4�g.R }* i * ifi : >.R 4'. 'y.}.. +} YM R' a [.�a+#. *-.>r �; 3 � k+� '� #■ ♦i1b.F a # = 1 A. a A#" a=" f 6 ®a.. . %'i f-Y b1T Y * •-: a / f {:# ay# r ,R' •. ,Hs;P a ..#- ... a-# % . .,ti A � .. f. y N. ai # Y s t ! 4'# me w a i i. - 8 )J � �R 4 & #�w '. x *a� s a•#' ::. * # r 7 a. ' : t - a ' Re' #.i f xy« !• ♦ �.... # y. a #.3. .rr {a� # fi a, i' %'a � F R * !� # ♦Pi-�. # w7- -. •j a♦ a t... R.. a 3' ! R. !.i as .�r ' * « R.a . * . $ , R . � * �•t�*�h # .: w {.�sR* fi. #�.i #,. i 'R � i�.tf�# � * ;..� �}.,i �fi' R:V* # f �.,le is a '.•i' 42,. i t 3f - # �*9 'a: k -a 4+• .o. f�Z aiaa - « ":>a•s� #. * '. .!' a- 'l+aa R:3 tl R :ro #'*6t X. # -3'sr ' ��� :� #�p`Mr YA`- a�a. Yt# Y _ <q: !�17. !i •* ,�il s. •s� -fit ,qi;* yx.� r{..a"x .<Y a +.- . a't brM'q:'.r {Y.' ,..x �.. .. ;,a+k •,b':�e , ,, n � +�♦... -. a...Y b.= w B Mw its £ x 'A ai �i Y:i. -5. a«.y.A s'edi- Y'.pe w: £ ik •... fti w i" ?a!+.. ,t•+w '� 0 � yya,Y 4. .� £ a. . }:Y3. 'a !a :t:.< aaf a.. < .• r-s >:c a si 8 a isa a. '�* hzi Al2a I4'l.l ..T pt: ♦f YY nJ._.. � �Mfd a-.1 � q Y - a x Y ('i: 4 y'!' i.�' ,.Yx>it . A .i"a G) # r ;:Yi �. `eti! tr -•. f.} a £ ajA . +. r •S .4iY�a'ww'# .�. . �r u. ':air Ya+K'! . 'x $Pa+O a.k<i .-.....w. �_ fi if 1k' • - !�! . Y.. .. � ,as.a.a,a�.;a .,.d p..n �' q _ a+ x.�. s k< "�.4%ai 3ev.. -_!": FR .� t.' _. Aix .,d„��s6 � 3�'aua "�" .. i• aSe :. ...e: .[i �' i-.p. . ,Y4' �" x r ..-' #:y+.ir . �!�♦ ,Y aI F 'K: :xe k. -1 d'w 4 PlsFye. . . .. r. �..! Q .'M.s. i��2 f R .. Ridi.: �'f �ikp-s .4 a,E.' n f, , P }i 1. i � Y.M. 'in [,t". :pn� 4 .�, 4,r T 'f.;ir wp #�a xa..i. k... +•,. r y:: •i x 4 t£r .y � ".l. 'o$ Y'p _ ♦R }. .Aa..d 1t 4 k ..t �v:e . µ�.r :'_r't Y-:t n: 4.4Mrt 'i' A i yw:5' 4 Fni * >} %, ,i''1 �] ,:pSe y Jit � i?y. � ['isP t 1 �`Yp• P 4.qr l . • sl ..2A t E!"i;; a'j� R:,.} f fat .AY' 8' �� ' p. #;x- ,FikR.t�(w s{,Y � �...i 4 9v^d+. P .w ] -f q.::. F' a a ! .'.'.].•. `ui&5' s f a n%..4 ! a p Fi 4t ,.#.,, f. ixf ?E:> aas.:.w. � ; r2.fA-1'w '-.k*.4 .�?v.1:. y {.�. � >i• ^ri es��'+' ite zs�'2 '-PF4 rasa ,...kt.�.i . t�* .^ " 2 .ra ps..M a.d;. �.'a+.t n.. ..R.2 na-p 3 ..-,... .: - 4,:X.,x. r I _ M} r zd,} S'a v+4 6 i. .� }t a-s4. •.�f. aP c♦ -1 t S � t r s � r�? e. -lF".3... �.,� t e.. a ... r.. s .w . - - . x a ..,L•K.t d.'..t a.r i�,. t ya 2 .e t •azra�' '�p.� „a .,t::...s a.� 4 tti� a oSR s.aA 4 .p%s.+ e��ld 2 r.a:'+.4i .:ef >.�;,., p �. s^.kx f < (". _pat n..6..y 4 4<, c:¢.::� H: tylk.. •� � i pt v+: S dAd �edf'¢*wi}" �2 '�`d, '' .}. ��f s".5'.� L e �. '.x'�.,:5 a 4t.y u / , � / i ��: U,. �- it t yx to oft= 4 OHO hmllr Awivn4a to IZ-,t 6 A tatritS ,fta 1-44 to fU E3' *- 190 is V* WTICO at 00 41 of tbo ftar4 idtht)* s "* Wo Jim* Ott, voo vroioit of tua 3 1) AWWAVO in 414woAtUT4 yyyyyy ,yy±yR¢yi _s std ��" � �'* gy a WMI • MCXs10B9Z Petition of John LeHaaau,, 9 Elm Avenuot to erect o. On*-Vtori Addition to dt allizgg to pro- vido additic=l sleeping quarte r se r Xtra Jolu2 LoBeaup 9 Elm AveLluos, appealed to the Board of Appeal from as decision of the Inspector of B2uild ngs. re- ill". asp it to erect a caste-story addition tohis Owl- ling to provides additional aaleeepi gmrtoro* The Zoning OrdSnairequire* a diatanei3 of testa toot from the building to the property lines on either oido,, and o B a -00 0 3 d eallcaw 0%, nix or seven foot, On 4ctobor 140 1.9� at are a hexa! ', t1* Bard Appeceel Sat the t14 eat � �t r 0� B�la$�t3Czz*#s, .a�aaile�d tes t poi tMx� tFtea ebuttef as otrBs u tzt+errtiosd in the vtzn3 Cep orx Baptsh+arC Arad czar 5. 160 All mombord of tto Board were proaant with tbo a nceaptia of th'« Jamo Douloor, 3Sr. After duo oonalderuti.on tharooi'e the Board by un ir-ous vote.$ four *aboral present andvoting on the grounds that they. propoo eadditlor? woW..d not oaxbRantiall der ,oto, from the intent, pwToae of the Zoo Biui dingo= tes# and that denial of the proposed vw da could erette A practical difficulty and wMecezo b...ezrddkaip to the peetitionezr# authorized the Actiaa In speactor -oof�inge to Issue mid pest. VARMICZs GRANT Mw BOARD Op APPEAL Bl�z Y as O m �, - m w w �� M V ® • W O O C M�/y� 7C '� • i VT! 1'0 P R �_.__ �� to two o� try dmuur�o tin. fiat 136 a ad 337 �t Clrolar. +A�lqj Yt to war araot tvo *UT Io atm fly dw*W �,dM�+ou Lot'4 r"s t*r*o D lulio,a arouch Moir attomor Wpt Jo WOO.# o d I L ► B6iw o A� fora rt�rloam A ton } ��7ULCM of tho ZmIrf OrdU zosfs M �bar 14,w 196), boor spt�+Ye ,o9s '� ;�'�t�G.to .� asxici kacs'�� ark >x�� �ltrtsrt�r All carbo o o of t CoArd word prowt tt thio bowCe w.tb tbo, oxcoptua ot `#!r. = +fix`* » AttorAoy mph J¢ Lul *" IMar *o OZ*" J'or t po - utiumrs Do om *"fid 1o. op Ition After dub o*Viderutia* thomoto t DW4 W mWivopa voto�t fmw- cwbors precam avA 'a C co tho aroundo tw t :1 pro**. Ngzmv# m* oto 3' t '�2so �' �tit � '«�firt'�� rt><sd ave �:t�.d a�^� ial- �'�'St�.t'yom► t�ta+r�'� a�Eatk�t�� A== t is DorA � J +4 II A.Y i R a #:{. 't A: ryc "" a . ♦sY ;. ..:sa d .: € z+i. .< Yi v. r#, ,.6. #Y R* S• S. V '4. :.> .", iYT ♦ a 5 -: .' 1 - d .itY t.t..' q'.3, ♦ _ t (.:�@ . t a r t 11 ♦ S:T - S .s. : i �. T % S 3 a 3i ' Y:.:i Di Y1.:... #ti F i., 4 '$ x KT ti NA.: :�Y ie•: e$M '� Y iRy, ti a,a : ._b J dx i sti i• Y Yl i 'te w ' as T, r + I S.. i. �. R i•b., Y3 :.T '.w + , T ' a, 'T 3'.... 3 Y :t .. ... 0 a ..F '+ i - M %. ♦. .. y.'=. „? a :x t ' 1 i i 'Y.ti ;: A•,^' T •t'� 'i eT Y T fl - t :: e'i f� t t t. rr : Y Tl:cut;, :.. .Y Y:{:»¢. ti ' -• a' :.1 , ,. ,� ea • Y .. # T �'- re a'• �'4 ' 'a f 'i x - i. Y 'k" - :Y R`$i. r.r ' �, do" } �,_- �T � .. a.. YiA rti,k ',2•s Vii' a �Y M.. i k. ., h i w O O c sp w m m w w m Y V i w . O . O m m I w y1w �I TSCISIONt Petition of Q* Gerard Ouellette to erect Fa QW-story addition 14 tx3O$,r to one and one-half if .awry dweller at 218 Cax al Street Extencion to provide e asoma apart=nt;. On Ccto 22, 3963• the Acting Y apector of Psaild In re. fused to issue a pamit to er sat an addition to 66 single fat aly dwol,lins located ,at 218 Canal Stasat tonsion aiaacaa aucb an addition d be in viola'ti+r athe Zuni brd� once requiring as ton root diptaaco to the lot, live ca oithor aide* pro ttOuellette a�pealed to tho.� of Appeal, for a vsrianee Lta � plieat�.csYt of t� 2wsaim� Ord3asrsaiets +ead tan TSta^ta ;ber l�, 19 a sx� ha3d in tPae chats c>f Tw Z ctor of t3ui�iam pvstat to s�aticsess rxptlod to 'thFt pa�tostpx'e t3xEi abuttexvs othsares, ae advtsrtl csed is tha dal ergvi fit# tam �a�v�ab®a2 A, 13. All mbbera of the Board wom pr os ont at this hear:, po one appeared isa Opposition* Amar duo consideration thosroof,a the Board by unaasimew vote: all nemborn pro-sent and voting on the grounds that the pro- ppeaed casagtx�axtstl.aaet eaauld n©t p�:banti�3tq dQa^carate i'ro� tT►o ante" purptase of the Zsar� Grditianca , thaxb +ienlal ta'r the propo apd varisaraca ctauld crtzata as prr�atical xtif>tfculty tszsd uzsnecexa Tadnh3 to t;has petitioner„ eutacsried t3se AOtI lsaapeactcsr of �di�a to ia4ue said perm9t� 'V'ARTMCE GRAt�'IEDW t D Off' APPSAL sec tet. � � J ' x :. �.t z - A . r � �. , , iSi b '}.fY ♦ •.E Y. e S.: ! qi ieYn ! 1.. A _Y"sj tl .� • •• m _ ._ :, # - s p�xx � a . �;1 � '... i'.i ` a '.4 ;, * , r. . g '« ii ' r .�faia :. �A # t la :.:9_ i t o } 1 n 4 ' R� # ! fay 4 x .Z.....s� �k e x. w {+ is"-.:: ` �.�y .. a. �, #r1. .d g xxx'r,, 4 a c# � r . -�. r 4 ty.. 9.,{eg iaK . i = iF $ }. :�FKit.Y•.. a 9..' ...;« - t: :.r ..1} � I.y d f i'} 4 1F .. Yi `n.1 q . i t t i 3_, j3d} __ I�SF, } 81'4 'F Y A • .-t '. L Y i. M1 +F Sl - 6 d t �. jai �.:t-:a t. Sh:S.. q�krY u i rt:,s g'a,. lx� x � xia`' . t.t uti ! 't ;- an. e.'. F Ms �u:' a - ♦ � <, � aK :�+ a . bis .... _�, v 9:a x�a:-� +.r.�. . a . a�4a ` z sa _€ Y g 5•# F:� 4. -b a.♦A.i /q � 5. . > Tf3 F $.� F 4 =41. .i Y £..! 6.'ri k.. :, z�:a. 'R` 9=++b ! :.>- _,i.x 3 3 A'.F s. 3 ! > i R :_ 4 ; #' a vf. R�' 'a.' 4:i n C -' Y.t @ 9.� 'N'i Q-L.2i' 1 1 ,.� iF titer ` yti �� # hh &.. »., _.5-' = 'v _ F9 Y Y _'d1};.. f:[, Fl:. b �. s tl i a 4.L x .: y 4 '� .M' 4 - i 3,:. - �.:./., ..,r , .dfiiW �. w O O m D cn m w w 1m '8 0o O O C: m 90 -o m m w w � J ' x.�. ' r ek . .ai.,+,nr q,1 _.. .a:.. a a;s t s. ''.* .. x' i;A.k-0c �. +. � .:.... r *.. y'v:.¢ (( f i."F4 4 Y rf,a }: tr� y n i:i .y L M 'e't¢f Al»':;' }.�:.k ,..a 1 .�A ', I � ;, ��j1..< ila1..5 f t,ifi ! I v yi.. A �.E wfj ;( . .y"s . , e..__ 4�, ns., rY« a 65 did;, Si},:. 'thf ' .�t 4.x,�.t '. a ,. .n xA ,t}., c s ♦� 5w ♦ Vit. �.b.a ♦� sad . ..♦ ri - :aw tc' :# �l.a x i W Y �l . '1 � Yt E_!f Alxta'o'... .:1.>' �f E •. #l4t"a • )Y 1"`Y m$+.tM.r.. �. Y e�q' l}dry tp,4�-' atAk r, t ;f. a1�•.M f'4 a `,t a V �?S ' i '.'1P +.V3 � Aa! f' k Y 2 1 _ I. £ fFP..b kk(tY 61 ' Yid Ira vd a}: a.# 4•. yd.J f. ' :$'s a.4 ,-I Y R -'Y'--i•)1�.F.• Eu Y v i.,�. $.. rt+3 W -1k 4 - AS F'-� s s i\i�. a EI'.. k ,tr }-t f F '�1 s'luj{� d 4k s..ia f i 'F.••a . '"ir.s a t . e. k 3.�3 ...y's > �p y , x "al-..M�,a:. 4"%u i'e. w �'+'3.. x Yk :.rd dx: F �2,t' �) "4'a Ac. t �. p.N S`,4 t:, t. t s" 'wpA. ) *�La a . u�:. x e #�.at �. A +s a q•x kJ« T:ifrnc.. }si 4'L '. p.a R. P:f..e '�,54� A'r4FY fp qi u" t vE f". i I ut?#`i �Y.. Y 9 '4R'. E ': ��.. v � I w o o e 3 rn N m �mo� � ', "� ® 9 � ' m F3{rY +n f` 'fit- j:,}#rv, w K+'* b k - .Xs ,';`8µyk •:bF >[ty.air. .i _.M .:YY 4. y r :4• -f:P ! ? ld. 4 i jv} 6 P J.:. 2 Nf]i 9:`a^ a ( ;A::Ewa o• Y:3 c-k- 4 L^;'..YSi .F t;-if .i.,: a.S": k^e lwAa. _ y:n• a..l.a tl:4tie' '.:1 .tir nY. t. 3,, Y ,�,:. a s k"i.°. �. i G.aiA neY a t :a. -.•• dt{. t. .t. � i. "�rq , f ♦�..Y d :')iv.4 j•k.'...} 4 k:..�' A '. dai- Y Y:.. 1 iti-�:::' � iF id axe .a : s;ee . .I f;#A w. + .: a +,,, o:..,P s ,> R t"'• a +a .d ?:'s: q '� 'M a • ,:s ,.� 'r,.,e P a:.{.. �' «. ..4 a_9 ".>ibaP 4 '@'�' K•. ae'F y ik- t f•ae.•. i �Yi:+Jr iak S aEY :.+G � S +. ( F.,v •.'A #hT.Y to .t' SIV FAiS I � �, #`�!$X, . r s'a.. y_e ':R e.,: r t' d' •I' f 4 *.>: :p P �'« KrA l;y X ti r �-' w x:1>6'<:..a 'vs r 4 '.',.'1�. are (: i . q s .'•K�k t.s .`a.'- f a P.a K.4 t: re m;f +i P•q'. c.f. ..F'- - P> • i4"ilPi♦ M•{ii 'R t ray + }.t ! { Yr "4" 4 t.¢ c-d'<,.a . • t-:+; ! `,s,• . 2 :ta.x - e 4 3. s•�4':r r& rti. a:=�. N^f•rrf .' -. ♦ .A @ .,, 's 4" 9-+� .t.,r i.'c •^+i' ♦ :•* i t'f'; a *<+5 t •P.:dRl ''m v a sx'X4. 'o-ei # , 'i k.'PS • _d:a,{. a. i{ � e,a_� `s t�: '�< .x �' a bx:ns-t, .w". ,�. x Ya..a :'q# a'q m o-<�:1 _-tnift ♦ La 3 Ex .}meq t � x ' a:+.� n �- P +&s' d. ...id kK' i! P:•} l.tl t"- 4 '.Y'14 �R'n;K. s'+4 wA...w_# iv 'alt' ♦ � .nit F 6 , tl4. �'.. �s.#.. }'+:f + l,,.t, ,nt ....a t`a4 ♦roe:-" 1-+ka t h ..k.. 3^-t, ,M. a.c• ;ti -CO d - :.,.# a J+-";rN2,Ka f'+ a.i" t, s.r. .b .zs:r w5. t,a ;'S " :.d u zt. ♦;V"P: n: a .•a M'Rir P '.ryt# 6 a .t '"eu ;.M s{a N y-. f A<. ,.xx''..n Rv AFl fa# tti, ti:a.i ■;a;P..'a lr. - a•=.� m's.Ri t X: .i,i iK Rdx Rq,.. J:. r ..' 1.2 x. x:€ •,. �., e _ 3 �`air » ' a d y is ,. '� ' }, R -� 4 t Y @}4 k't. #, :'•3 Y ,. '"Y k I Md.,. V a t 'k.. f .. 4 ': 7 t' Z �" 1V 8 '. s Y: '.F Y .'83 ,•i.Y.3 2 t 3k '. # ,.5. a �' 4�Y'• ': t A 4! 2 .-A 4 .k -. { 1' o•& X !.'v 4•t i. _- 4t3 4i' «.f s, . i ' t •• Y ..k.* , #+ :f'd- i,k.-. �4, 4' i•-.. b e i +!'�'. 14 X. Y. L Mak Y y.. fi "93. i. i.3 < ': r I. . F •, a '.s '"4 S t1�. t 4. r4 't.�X . Ori :8 - a t. '.♦. a h 'E7 s ! Y t.1. 3a Yi. . t 4 Z .t a 8 ` 3'4 ♦_ : '.N :Y s t 4 Y $-.. -. u Y M`t .. Sy d+ $ t d' 1k + 4.• Z 43..x. t.' ':f ` f ls: e48 3't rt' k y-FY »1:xG 7 41i: Will$ . k..w.. !. t�9. :3 Y' F,i k ♦ 4 '.: : 1.Y i > ,4 -X .s .t a i »VY' R. O O m U) M a m 0 o� O O Q � 3 r*s to m V ci i i Y F )1 f•• .#i� •3 .♦ #: 4: 4.. '#'. '. ,FAF x . :- � fix. ' �.�' a ..e-. .• - i? b. it--: .' a . d �.i ff .P. . Y i d Y ! i..J #�.. f i 3 W._ Y i F -' d > r !.1 4 Ati.. ! i.fN ! i k e w ♦ a 'i . �, - .e t Q • Y 6,. 4 ?F f b. F, � # ''a � a � e.'. i .� .e 't 3 2.R'. t r' k 3>p t "1 /i ♦ Fsfl �.l J' F 1 Yx:;a c.,. y' ♦. a #.:: 1.a i '�; fig, a.' J."'wa e n , W x �� .Y y ; ! J Fr '$ a a ... a F# f x'T'F- 4�4` w �'Y'c F a ��; $ :. s . � -a. w:' Y �.. w# ♦ s'd fn..0 : '�x.a. .fi f '; k 4 ':�. � �. m; Y £�.. C i i ._l �F'1 Y :,.ui 'Y` i ..-t a .b :J S k A S .r�. . ';:d%f' :•.y' �1 �'•'•-.. ♦ 4F� T fgad t ;.! h b s♦ 4 + 4 lbs i 4 `..1 ✓l, a x Ye9Y J F.�- ! l Y .: Wt Y a y ,µ i�-r •. fi 4.. :F.F #t k .:3 s S F• T s M '. i T _ yy. 'rt.., i F K �.r n 4 ^ • . n '' 4� r• f F'* rY -. a d i.FY. G". L's Yf � e d.: �,f T..�i. # Fk .-e ae fa;. ' a f ,�4. a ... pr M IT c.F k µ . �.. � • Rn p �e v MCISIM peatition or Jame H* Raulear. 12 mon P4ad to Oro*t a one story Addigion to dwelling to be UWA as enclosed porch� joov F4, Doyle On goom*er ld. 1963# Uro Buhr applied for a permit to erect an addition to his dwelling at 12 Uozamo Road to be used as cm endorsed poarch. .and woo refueed by the Inspector of DUWiW as such construction would be it VIOUtift, of tbo revised Zon- i Ice Ordizaticea of thq City of Saam* Thesea c s rov icod *o a O tobor 231962. require a yard mt loss than thirty fbat d V [in tbn rear m the bul dlAp*. On DOCOMbor los 1963 pro Sou or 4pposled to tho Ebard of ApPOO11, pestits6fli s for 4 varl anon ,f*vrs tho nwicatiosx of sold ordinmcos* Caay�. J �' 204; 196th, a bean Uses. held Cn thio Pati- titan its to "S100 or the ln:spootor of flulldlr4d# Room 7 City HOU, des. gone* All ria + s of tho � o �op aaa tktio t lago M-,, Bomar appeared # eamslainod for tho now construction tfas one +Eppt?At'md in CspptaeiCi . After dues ootolderrtatioz: thoreot. the Board by manimouts vote# all rmabom premm ead votes can the grounds that tboproa"- pct construotiruz would not �tartie2lyr dor€rgAto frta� °tbo 3sztearat and purpose of the Ordlooneat. authorlood the xnenpoOter OV 8611dipSo to Isom cold porn tr VAR�GAFtCR C�t11D' �, , SOA1 t3 OP APPAL r -fl i m � � a . . � . W o c .� M1 � N m , � � �Y 1 .. 1 4. V 4 s l ��