60 MARLBOROUGH ROAD - BUILDING INSPECTIONrF760 MAR BOROUGH ROAD
C 3 . CLC9a± of ntem, asmr4 setb
AI
� �R'r(' OFFICE M MASS PIIxrb of A"ral.
APRIL 23, 1980
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF HUGH AND ROSANNA MULLIGAN REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR,
60 MARLBOROUGH ROAD.
A hearing on this Petition was held on April 23, 1980 with the following
Board Members present: James H. Boulger, Jr., Chairman, Messrs. Hopper, LaBrecque,
Feeherry and Associate Member Piemonte. Notices of the hearing were sent to
abutters and others and a notice of the hearing was published in the Salem Evening
News on April 9, 1980 and April 16, 1980 in accordance with Massachusetts General
Laws Chapter 40A.
The Petitioners have requested a variance for the property at 60 Marlborough
Road to combine three existing lots into two lots for the construction of : single
family homes. One of the lots will contain 19,858 square feet and the other
14,388 square feet. A variance is required because the building is in a R-C
district where the proposed lots would be prohibited without a variance.
The Board of Appeals, after consideration of the evidence presented at
the public hearing and after viewing the property makes the following findings
of fact:
(1) The proposed. combination of three lots into two lots is consistent
with the size of the lots in the area.
(2) Without a variance this property is not buildable.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and the evidence presented
at the public hearing, the Board of Appeals concludes as follows:
(1) The property in question is bounded by a playground on one side and
is surrounded by single-family homes with lots of approximately_
10,000 sq. ft. Without a variance this property is unbuildable:
(2) The conditions described above especially affect the .land in
question, but do' ndt•generally affect the zoning district in which
---
the land is located.
(3) The conditions described above which affect the land in question;
but not the zoning district generally cause a special hardship to
the petitioners. Without a variance their land is valueless.
(4) The desired variance may be granted without substantial detriment
to the public good because the proposed lots are consistent with
other lots in the neighborhood.
Therefore, the Board of Zoning Appeals unanimously voted in favor of
granting the requested relief. The Board grants a variance to the petitioners on
the following terms and conditions:
QV APPEAL - DECISION - HUGH & ROSANNA MULLTffAN - 60 PfARLBOROUGH RD. }
y,
" REGEl'i E'D
1. In accordance with the plans submitted with the Board this property will
be divided into two lots, one containing 19,858 square feet and the other
14,388 square feet.
2. Any future construction on these lots shall conform to the. requirements
of an R-1 district for density and setback requirements, but frontage,
lot width requirements and lot area requirements shall be as provided in
the petitioner's plans.
3. The Board's action on this variance is subject to any approval needed from
the Planning Board.
GRANTED
Anthony M. eherry, Acting S cretary
i
APPEAL FROM THIS DECISIO3, IF ANY. SHALL BE MADE PURSUANT TO SECTION 17 OF THE MASS.
GENERAL LA'VIS, CHAPTER M. AND S.ML BE MUD W'!TY:!Y 25'DAYS AFTER. THE DATE OF FILING -
OF THIS DECISION IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLER3. - - -
PUDSANT TO MASS. CaIERAL W`:.'S. ChANHR gra, Sn'TT;':N 11. THE VAMICE C? SPECIAL PERMIT -
GRAOTEG HEREIN. SHALL N.A TRPS EFFE T U%TIL A MPY OF THE)EWS!),i. BEARIINM THE CERT• ,
FICATION OF 14E CITY CLERX NAF 25 'JAYS NAYS EUPS M0 NO APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED. _
OR THAT. IF SUCH AN APPEAL HAS BEEN FILEDT1-167. IT F=u £EEA CM.NSScD OR DWIED IS
RECORDED IN THE SGUTH ESSEX REt_ISTRY OF DEEDS AND ii;Dr,�,ED UP:DER THE NAME OF THE OVINER
OF RECORD-OR IS RECORDED AND NOTED CII THE OWNER'S CERTIFICATE OF TITLE.__
- BOARD OF APPEAL .• -
A COPY OF THIS DECISION H&S BEEN FILED WITR THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK.
r �.a
Richard T. McIntosh
i
1 Salem Green
745-0213 April 27,1984
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
This Department will issue a Building Permit for
the construction of a Single Family Dwelling at
40 Marlborough Rd.
Axc '
Richard T. McIntosh
Inspector of Buildings
j5
I bJ`iy
a
;y+'.yk{M`S""'V.ShV",-PRr^" :tPttra:"R..igj dF°'^'Rpz79Rm*�^TR!y^an"'
-
°�` 'i(
rt t ff Vj
I�j�s -
+
�-
f��
7 � + d 1 k t �n b It «h! 1� r r'7. 11'{,' '` �4 .'• €t �� � z t
-
r,Rl
11{t�}J.VY T7 1 � ( IY(jll f ✓ �
{„E g5��'H.}�j P P .. 3Y f U-'� s! ".l ( {�� � 7 �I. ri�� 1 y�l n YA 4 � �T,,,+-..-.-.�r.+.r+.::d} ✓1� y ,,.-,
r ��.4 R4 [ L+ 'fk"�X bni;rr .r7 § 1j v�li1 fl€7, iAb II1e xba` t£ .•k �.. a�. / 4�� .
� } 4 ♦r s R r# 'ifi i. 4 ,+e +' k a a - k�a�t 'Y'�O 65°'S4'71d ,�n*2" srgr .
t � tk '� �il-"ac,ah.�Y...:IU.�r.4•,..e.'i t e
t x �" W:' {> �. ; "F ti`!'• w t �, /inq•f,A �J'�]/h�PA.arT.�tf�7 t
� cr i� � 1� t�y9tieLu'.6�w� � t '� y � f r ` ---�"":•"e�• S�
fsrYJ " M3
IA1
S` (`
T� e�,� • i w '�#Y. aR-� u".,,s�.�s;,.�rq,.m> b.�•*=r f .
d a
y( fr �., s q� - , f ♦+ > 1 an X` .: fi @ i'!/�, Fr
,
t
q{f r r •e, t 'Y . f�q o
: . 4 oYd:# _ f •IJ wrti M" .� �' - i } �.�
vvTr� r
q p
�7 r t } " Fn y7 5J � � �Y 1 �i ^ ��y�q,IT�` `Y➢ { * ,
o- J
b
s `1
k t �
�r�f` y�Y�S,��,%.r�Mu.w«rt'u..L.J`I'
t i". R r. cgs .r4„a r'.ate^^ n r�+a�:.»1F•nrr `d.�.7 6-n �•v1 , 1' iw� (� x^”" s'rw',:fin ^'"K9. n.
I
1 s;w
t h
2'A.9 ,x.549 n..y0.