Loading...
114 MARGIN STREET - BUILDING INSPECTION 114 MARGIN STREET FJ�REGYGEO�f UPC 10330 `No. 153L °ankN4 HASTINGS, MN The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Public Safety One Ashburton Place, Room 1301 Boston, Massachusetts 02108-1618 Charles D.Baker Phone (617) 727-3200 Governor ett Fax (617) 727-5732 Daniel aSecetary Karya E.Polito Lieutenant Governor TTY (617) 727-0019 Matthew Moran Commissioner www.mass.gov/dps Date: November 15,2016 Name of Appellant: Emily Stuart Service Address: 1 Galloupes Terrace Swampscott,MA. 01907 In reference to: 114 Margin Street Salem, MA. 01970 Docket Number: 16-0070 o , o- Property Address: 114 Margin Street 6 Salem,MA. 01970 ro Vit, c Date of Hearing: October 18,2016 > Enclosed please find a copy of,the decision on the matter aforementioned. w Sincerely: BULDING ODE APPEALS BOARD Patricia Barry,Clerk cc: Building Code Appeals Board,Building Official 1 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS SUFFOLK, ss. BUILDING CODE APPEALS BOARD DOCKET NO.APP-BCAB16-0070 Marza, LLC, ) Appellant ) V. ) City of Salem, ) Appellee ) DECISION Introduction This matter came before the State Building Code Appeals Board ("Board") as a result of an appeal application filed pursuant to G.L. c. 143, § 100 ("Application"). Appellant Marza, LLC is seeking relief from 780 CMR Table 602 and Table 705.8, with respect to a project to convert an existing garage building to a single-family dwelling, located at 114 Margin Street, Salem, MA ("Appeal"). Procedural History On or about September 15, 2016, an Assistant Building Inspector for the City of Salem's Inspectional Services Department ("ISD") determined that Appellant's proposed change-of-use from an existing garage building to a single-family dwelling triggered certain parts of the 2009 International Building Code ("IBC") (as adopted and amended by Massachusetts as part of 780 CMR), because of the proximity of exterior walls to real property lines. The Inspector cited IBC Table 602 (and Section 602.1) and Table 705.8 (Section 705.8.1). The Appeal was filed on September 21, 2016. The Board held the hearing on October 18, 2016. All interested parties were allowed opportunities to present evidence, including testimony under oath. The following individuals appeared at the hearing: (for Appellant: Emily Stuart, Paula Pearce); (for Appellee: Harry Wagg); (for the Board: Robert Anderson, Jennifer Hoyt,John Couture; Board Clerk: Patricia Barry). We also considered the following evidence: (1) State Building Code Appeals Board Appeal Application; (2) three photographs of existing conditions of parts of exterior of building, "114 Margin Street—Proposed Changes" with floor plan, plot plans of site in which building is located, and letter of support from direct abutter to Appellant's property (dated September 19, 2016). 1 Findings and Discussion The issues arose because the existing building contains wall openings located within three feet of property lines, on two sides of the building. The proposed new window openings will be smaller than the present openings on these sides; reduced from 33 square feet to 20 square feet. We also note that the City is not opposed to our allowing the requested relief. (Note that the Assistant Building Inspector cited fire-resistant and fire-separation requirements set forth in the IBC. Although the potential application of the 2009 International Residential Code for One-and Two-Family Dwellings ("IRC") was not discussed during the hearing and not raised by any of the parties, we note that, pursuant to IRC R302.1 and IRC Figure 8302.1(3), window openings also must be at least 3 feet from property lines for a single or two-family dwelling. The IRC, like the IBC, also has been adopted and amended by Massachusetts as part of 780 CMR (the 8th Edition of the State Building Code). We note the potential application of what is effectively the same general rule in both the IBC and IRC because Appellant's project involves creating a second, single-family dwelling, on the same lot. The evidence provided indicates that the existing garage contains less than 35,000 cubic feet of enclosed space (thus not subject to Construction Control under 780 CMR 107, which is a Massachusetts amendment to the IBC) and would share common area with the existing single- family dwelling located on the same lot. If the two single-family dwellings were attached, then they might be considered to be a two-family dwelling within the IRC.) Conclusion Based on our findings and conclusions above regarding these particular circumstances, we considered a motion to grant variances from 780 CMR Table 602 and Table 705.8 ("Motion"). The Motion was approved by unanimous vote. Accordingly, the Appeal is GRANTED. /111 /- /- Jennifer Hoyt Robert Anderson, Chair John Couture DATED: November 15, 2016 Any person aggrieved by a decision of the State Building Code Appeals Board may appeal to Superior Court in accordance with G.L. c.30A, §14 within 30 days of receipt of this decision. 2 -o- * 4' ; K ESTATE,BUILDING,CODE APPEALS BOARD. ,kb } ' Service Notice V- as `as r for the Appellant/Petitioner 111C . ?04AC Vea(dZ`r EM'11 U ��k0.r� an appeal filed with the State 1. Building Code Appeals Board on �e��l ewll�c o2C� 20 HEREBY SWEAR UNDER THE PAINS AND PENALTIES OF PERJURY THAT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROCEDURES ADOPTED BY THE STATE BOARD OF BUILDING REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS AND SECTION 113.0 OF THE STATE BUILDING CODE, I SERVED OR CAUSED TO BE SERVED, A COPY OF THIS APPEAL APPLICATION ON THE FOLLOWING PERSON(S) IN THE FOLLOWING MANNER. NAME AND ADDRESS OF METHOD OF DATE OF PERSON OR AGENCY SERVED SERVICE SERVICE 1 I�GCC c W 1 ;a�� a. a 2 cn <y 3 D r" SignaffretAMxllantWt Petitioner On the Day of 5f� 20 PERSONALLY APPEARED BEFORE ME THE ABOVE NAMED em 1 ` 5 I tkmZt (Type or Print thk Name of the Appellant) AND ACKNOWLEDGED AND SWORE THE ABOVE STATEME & MATTHW INGRAM Notary Publlc COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS - L M commis OTARY PUBLIC oz2 7 - The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Public Safety Board of Building Regulations and Standards One Ashburton Place, Room 1301 Boston, Massachusetts 02108-1618 Phone (617) 727-3200 Fax (617) 227-1754 STATE BUILDING CODE APPEALS BOARD APPEAL APPLICATION FORM DOCKET NUMBE 4116 The undersigned hereby appeals to the State Board of Building Regulations and Standards from the decision of the following person. (Please fill-in the name of the appropriate municipal or state building inspector or other authorit} Also,Also indicate if this is a request for a hearing de novo (new hearing)relative to a decision of a municipal app board.) Building Official from the City/Town of: y v6W � Board of Appeals from the City/Town of: (Request for hearing de novo) State Building Official: Other: Please mark the appropriate box indicating the requested action to be considered by Appeals Board members. VarianceOrder Direction YVai-ta�kce- Interpretation Failure to Act Other stAn usE.ONLY J" Fee Received` Check Number„ Received By (This section must be completed or the application Will be returned.) Has the building or structure been the subject of an appeal by this or any other appeals board previous to this filing? No ❑ Yes $ If,yes,please indicate the date of the previous appeal,whether the matter was heard before a local or state appeals board,the code section that was at issue,and the specifics of the decision (i.e.a variance was granted\not granted). 4 Plsz0.sQ ccWc cA kec� Ja`iayce was o A SuAe r7 pots Siem 7n LVc Leo,rel PCVM,,-+ waS ! � cry� awne V7i 201T bti Salem 70K,���tf Please take care to submit all written supporting documentation with this application to allow time for review. However,Board members reserve the right to continue proceedings if such material warrant extensive review. Please provide a brief description of the desired relief below. Additional information may be attached if space is not sufficient. All appropriate code sections that are subject to appeal inust be identted in the description. %0,,z sea 0-4v,�"ck AgschpA)W t-Q�4, Please complete the following section completely and accurately. Name of �a� tlC Represe pnting. Appellant: EM� S�^N� `al, %&i-ce Address For Service l ( Awfgs Swaw\Psc��41 , M� v1�O7 Telephone Fax Number: Number. Address of Subject Property ' I L{ Mar l 1 A Sti'e-e-I sc�'e-\/Vl (if different from service address): What is appellant's connection to subject property? D �� I i l�i EV\A StUOJ� Signa rc o Appellant \or Representative Please Print Name Legibly Please retain applications to: Program Manager;Board of Appeals ; . , Board of i' dutg Regulations and Standards One Ashburton Place,Room 1301 m d __ BostoriMA 021081618 r w�: , 5 Marza, Ilc Appeals Application September 20, 2016 Brief Description of Proposed Work Renovation of a 1300 sf brick garage/stable into a 2 bedroom, 2 bathroom apartment. Brief Description of Desired Relief We request a variance to EBC code 2009 Table 705.8 which establishes the maximum area of exterior wall openings where the fire separation distance is less than 3 ft, Our proposed plan, which was approved by the Salem Zoning Board of Appeals on June 17, 2015, has 2 window openings on each of 2 walls that have less than 3 ft distance to property line. The North wall of the property has 1.5 ft to the property line on the Northwest corner and 2.1 ft to the property line on the Northeast comer. There is a masonry garage on the adjacent property that is 4.5 It from the property in question. We propose recessing the windows into our property by 1 ft which is the thickness of the brick wall. The windows on the North wall are 13 % of the exterior wall area. The West wall of the property is on the property line. There is a driveway and lawn abutting the property on the adjacent property. We propose recessing the windows into our property by 1 ft which is the thickness of the brick wall. The windows on the North wall are 9 % of the exterior wall area. Please see attached letter of support from the abutting property owner. CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS INSPECTIONAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT THOMAS ST.PIERRE INSPECTIONAL SERVICES DIRECTOR /BUILDING COMMISSIONER KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL MAYOR 120 WASHINGTON STREET♦ SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TEL:978-745-9595 FAx:978-740-9846 Date: ? September 15,2016 To: ' MARZA,LLC j c------ yStuart__.--_-_—.-_-- --- Address: 1 Galloupes Terrace City/State/Zip: Swampscott,MA 01907 r_ 114 Margin Street Re: 114 /Exterior Openings 4 Dear Ms. Stuart, Your project involves the change-of-use of an existing garage building to a single family dwelling. As such, your project must comply with applicable provisions of IBC- 2009 (the International Building Code). Because two of your exterior walls are within three feet of the lot lines, you are prohibited from having any windows on those sides of the building. Table 602* of the Code establishes the fire-resistance rating requirements for exterior walls. At your property, where two walls are less than 3'-0" from the lot lines, the Table requires a Ihour Fire-Resistance Rating. The existing brick walls satisfy the Ihour requirement. Table 705.8** establishes the maximum total area of exterior wall openings that can be allowed in those 1 hour walls. Where the fire separation distance is less than 3'-0" (as confirmed by your plot-plan), then wall openings, of any size, are"not permitted". Regarding your specific project: you are required to have escape and rescue openings in the proposed bedrooms, but you are not permitted to have openings in the bedroom walls as they are shown on your current floor plan. You are denied permission to continue to use the existing window openings,or to create new openings in the walls noted above. CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS INSPECTIONAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT THOMAS ST.PIERRE INSPECTIONAL SERVICES DIRECTOR /BUILDING COMMISSIONER KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL MAYOR 120 WASHINGTON STREET♦ SALEM,MASSACHUSEITS 01970 TEL:978-745-9595 ♦ FAx:978-740-9846 You make seek relief from the Code requirement by appealing to the BBRS (Board of Building Regulations and Standards) for a variance. If you choose to pursue such an appeal, this Department will not oppose you. Sincerely, Harry Wagg j Assistant Building Inspector ( 978-619-5643 hwagg@salem.com *Chapter 6, Section 602.1 & **Chapter 7, Section 705.8.1 cc. T. St. Pierre, Bldg. Commissioner File v��eoNorr, CITY OF SALEM MASSACHUSETTS 3.' BOARD OF APPEAL 120 WASHINGTON STREET# $ALEnt,hL1SSACFIUSEITS 01970 KIMBERLEY DRlscou, TELr:978-745-9595 ♦ FAX:978-740-9846 MAYOR Notice of Decision At a meeting of the City of Salem Zoning Board of Appeals held on Wednesday,June 17, 2015 at 6:30 p.m. at 120 Washington St.,Salem,MA, the Zoning Board of Appeals voted on the following item: Petition of MARZA, LLC, seeking a Variance requesting relief from Sec. 4.1.1 Table of Dimensional Requirements from minimum lot area per dwelling unit to convert an existing garage into a dwelling unit.The petitioner is also seeking a Special Penn it per Sec. 3.3.3 Nonconforming Structures of the Salem Zoning Ordinance,to alter the use of an existing nonconforming structure located at the property of 114 MARGIN STREET (Map 25 Lot 500)(R2 Zoning District). Decision:GRANTED Filed with the City Clerk on June 29,2015 Thu notice is being sent in compliance with the Massachusetu General Laws, Chapter 40A, Sections 9&15 and does not require action by the recipient.Appeals,if any,shall be made pursuant to Chapter 40A,Section 17,and shall be filed witbin 10 days from the date which the demon war filed with the City Clerk /f ON it . w CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS n �•zt K BOARD OF APPEAL1013 JM 29 P 3 c TTS \ // 120 WAS141NGTON STREET♦SALEM,MASSACHUSE01970 `�o lUMBERLEYDRISCOLL TELE:978-745-9595♦ FAX:978-740-9846 FILE # MAYOR PITY CLERIC. SALEM, MASS, June 29, 2015 Decision City of Salem Board of Appeals Petition of MARZA,LLC, seeking a Variance requesting relief from Sec.4.1.1 Table ofDimensional Requirements from minimum lot area per dwelling unit to convert an existing garage into a dwelling unit. The petitioner is also seeking a Special Permit per Sec.3.3.3 Nonconforming Structures of the Salem Zoning Ordinance,to alter the use of an existing nonconforming structure located at the property of 114 MARGIN STREET (Map 25 Lot 500)(82 Zoning District). A public hearing on the above Petition was opened on May 20, 2015 pursuant to M.G.L Ch. 40A, § 11. The hearing was dosed June with the following Salem Board of Appeals members present: Rebecca Curran (Chau),Peter A. Copelas,Tom Watkins,Jimmy Tsitsinos,James Hacker. The petitioner is seeking a Variance requesting relief from Sec. 4.1.1 Table to Dimensional Requirements from minimum lot area per dwelling unit and a Special Permit per Sec. 3.3.3 Nonconfomting Stturnrres to alter an existing nonconforming structure to provide for a substantially different purpose from an attached garage to serve as an additional dwelling unit. Statements of fact: 1. In the petition date-stamped May 20, 2015, the Petitioner requested a Variance requesting relief from Sec. 4.1.1 Table of Dimensional Requirements from minimum lot area per dwelling unit to allow a reduction in the minimum lot size per dwelling unit and Special Permit per Sec. 3.3.3 Nonconforming Structures of the Salem Zoning Ordinance to alter an existing non-conforming structure to provide for a substantially different purpose from an attached garage to serve as an additional dwelling unit. 2. Emily Stuart and Paula Pearce of Marza,LLC,petitioners,presented the petition. 3. The petitioner proposes to convert an existing single-family home into 2 (two) dwelling units located in an existing attached garage. 4. The property is located in an R2 (Residential 2-Family) district. 5. There is a driveway with three (3) outdoor parking spaces on-site. 6. The petitioner requested a Variance from Sec. 4.1.1 Table of Dimensional Requirements requesting relief from minimum lot area per dwelling unit to allow two (2) dwelling units on a lot that is approximately 4,352 square feet The Salem Zoning Ordinance requires 7,500 per dwelling unit. 7. The petitioner also requested a Special Permit per Section 3.3.3 Nonconforming Stmetvrer to provide for a substantially different purpose from an attached garage to serve as an additional dwelling unit 8. The requested relief, if granted, would allow the Petitioner convert and existing single-family home into two (2) dwelling units on an existing non-conforming lot and structure. City of Salem Board of Appeals June 29,2015 Project: 114 Margin Street Page 2 of 3 9. At the public hearing three (3) members of the public spoke in favor of and none (0) spoke in opposition to,the petition. The Salem Board of Appeals, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the public hearing, and after thorough review of the petition, including the application narrative and plans, and the Petitioner's presentation and public testimony, makes the following findings that the proposed project meets the provisions of the City of Salem Zoning Ordinance: Findings for Variance: 1. The special conditions and circumstances that especially affecting land,building or structure involved generally not affecting other lands,buildings,and structures in the same district is its unique size and structure. In particular,the existing structure is 1320 square feet and has no functional use to the property. 2. The literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the applicant as the building is large and was once used as a commercial space is not typically attached to a single family structure and is not zoned for a non-residential use. 3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good, and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the ordinance. Findings for Special Permit 1. The proposed change use of a non-conforming structure would not be more substantially detrimental than the existing non-conforming structure to the impact on the social, economic or community needs served by the proposal. 2. There are no impacts on traffic flow and safety, including parking and loading as there are three (3) on-site parking spaces that conform to the parking requirements of the Salem Zoning Ordinance. 3. The capacity of the utilities is not affected by the project 4. There are no impacts on the natural environment,including drainage. 5. The proposal improves neighborhood character as it improves the property. 6. The potential fiscal impact,including impact on the City tax base is positive. On the basis of the above statements of facts and findings, the Salem Board of Appeals voted five (Rebecca Curran (Chair),Peter A. Copelas,Jimmy Tsitsinos,Tom Watkins,James Hacker) in favor and none (0) opposed,to grant a Variance per Sec. 4.1.1 Table of Dimensional Requirements from minimum lot area per dwelling unit to convert-an existing garage into a dwelling unit and a Special Permit per Sec. 3.3.3 Nonconforming Structures of the.Salem Zoning Ordinance, to alter the use of an existing nonconforming structure subject to the following terms,'conditions and safeguards: 1. The Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes,ordinances,codes and regulations. City of Salem Board of Appeals June 29,2015 Project: 114 Margin Street Page 3 of 2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted to and approved by the Building Commissioner 3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. 4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to beginning any construction. 5. Exterior finishes of new construction shall be in harmony with the existing structure. G. A Certificate of Inspection shall be obtained. 7. A Certificate of Occupancy shall be obtained. 8. Petitioner is to obtain approval from any City Board or Commission having jurisdiction including,but not limited to, the Planning Board. Reliecca Curran,Chair Board of Appeals A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal fmm this dea.rime, if any, .shall he made pnnrmnt to Section 17 of the Mauachatenr Genera!laws Chapter 40A,and.shall be filed within 20 days of fiGnB of this deation in the office of the City Cknt=Pursuant to the Marrachnretts General Laws Cbapter 40A,Section 11, the Variance or Special Permitgranted herein sball not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the artipcate of the City Clerk has been f:kd with the Essex South Registry of Deeds. 114 Margin Street— Proposed Charges FRONT VIEW Existing Brid"kJRemains on Front le e 10 all tb i ti•: .. � rya''✓�. �:. Operabla Patio dors Noewera3i-la Patio Door Operabt-a Patio Doors ;Alh transom above with transom above with transom above SIDE VIEW WITH STUCCO Stucco added on M New Dace :des e;building , i,notfront) JuStin WiiIMMS GOnStructiOn Sluartip%ott„ PAA + 114 Margin Street — Proposed Changes SIDE VIEW WITH STUCCO x a rs "� xn New Windows p f d 'fik'tf G. '4' 4. New Windows FLOOR PLAN I AISLiE:— il+—.pt t-.9 -I^_'�gllca.l —'S!ItSb! i I I —a i— --------- QI i is v I I 1 i 91ro5i, ll1—d.-9lIll P9 i' .HE b-.E.—" — tiro LtE9 - -84Rs Justin Williams Construction Swampscott, MA N a z � z 0 _ p 11 BD. N G G � owEusNG � P.R/` X114 . � N m Q a 1 Tr► 1 g � i V m 1 f m 11 m m 1 o ' 81.5' OF MARGIN STREET �ySH ALq�_ yl �f C.A. Bu 178 y MORTGAGE LOAN PLOT PLAN a v SID QQ C'AAMCO MORTGAGE LOAN PLOT PLANS LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING CONSULT CIVIL ENGINEERING SERVICES P.O.BOX 14 TEL:800.675.1591 A REGISTERED I, C.A.REGISTERED K LAND SURVEYOR, CLINTON,MA. 01510 FAX.978-365-7419 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SERVICES DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE DATE: FEBRUARY28.2015 RECORDED AT: ESSEX SOUTH COUNTY REGISTRY OF DEEDS MORTGAGE INSPECTION PLAN WAS CLIENT: LOA.BALD12ZONE DONOVAN BOOK: 31131 PAGE: L.C.CERT# PREPARED FOR: CLIENT PER NIA �— CHICAGO TITLE INS.CO. PLAN REFERENCE: P.O.# 303015 DRAWN PER TOWN/CITY OF ASSESSOR'S MAP# PARCEL# DATED: IN CONNECTION WITH A NEW MORTGAGE AND IS THE LOCATION DF THE ORIGINAL DWELLING SHOWN ADDRESS: 114 MARGIN STREET NOT INTENDED OR REPRESENTED TO BE A LAND OR HEREON EITHER WAS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE LOCAL _SALEM MA 01970 PROPERTY UNE SURVEY. NO CORNERS WERE SET, APPLICABLE ZDHIHG BYLAWS IN EFFECT WHEN BORROWER: MARZA,UC,PAULA PEARCE&EMILYSTUART IT CANNOT BE USED FOR ESTABLISHING FENCE, CONSTRUCTED (WITH RESPECT TO HORIZONTAL INA 100 YR LANDSCAPING, OR' BUILDING LINES. ND DIMENSIONAL REDUIREADOS ONLY),OR IS EXEMPT SUBJECT DWELLING IS IN FLOOD ZONE AE' (FLOOOMMAIDAREA RESPONS181UTY IS EXTENDED HEREIN RIR FROM VIOLATION ENFORCEMENT ACTION UNDER AS SHOWN ON NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM FLOOD ENCROACHMENT. OR LTL: MATTERS THAT MAY MASS. G.L TITLE VII, CHAP.416L SEC. 7, UNLESS INSURANCE RATE MAP DATED: JULY 16,2014 SUBSEQUENTLY BE DISCOVERED BY AN OTHERWISE HBO OR SHOWN HEREON. IF ANY COMMUNITY-PANEL# _250102 04190 - INSTRUMENT SURVEY.THE LAND SHOWN HEREON IMPROVEMENTS ARE SITUATED WITHIN I'n OF AN IS BASED ON CLIENT FURNISHED INFORMATION AND APPARENT PROPERTY UHE AN INSTRUMENT SURVEY I FIELDED I DRAFTED CHECKED 11 ESS258.10 MAY BE SUBJECT TD FORMER BUT-SALES, ISRECOMMENOEIL BY: I CS I CS I CAB Y y d u NJ l�:FftW60.t(UHE wy- 5 § BOW yd UNIT , •• 40MMd1 / � / PpPCN � �M ,• � .. ON ¢ 3 N x. yM r „ ,t. �,..✓'Y f u,?^ea' - OVRlllNG, "..m,..nr. '+ n <r'(b'. "r x�w����,♦ � � 4 "r t, �m d-.. "`e.wA'..Cdk*.-..... u GAR,,G fi Eacw�tTi r ` f ng� �# m ✓ 4 � .. ka' `.M'^ ✓Y'� r 'n'X,f 1'y x re s gmcniANolaiss. m b M � w FRANK.FEMWO f X+• e x K". •q 'p a T r w BN. }dA BK. 6EMINC ry " REG. I7d5 FG 260 � >aY •'!� TS EXC�UVVE USE F• `UNIT 1 • „ # PARKING KPARKING ' PARKING PARKING "PARKING UNIT 2. v UNIT i^ UNIT 1 UNIT 2 UNIT 2. t. a v r a 75.71._.., 9tl I September 19, 2016 To Whom It May Concern: My name is Robert Femino and I own the property located at 120-124 Margin Street in Salem, Massachusetts. My property directly abuts the structure located at 114 Margin Street,which is owned by Paula Pearce and Emily Stuart of Marza, LLC.The portion of my property abutting 114 Margin, is a driveway and small lawn. I have no intention of altering the purpose of that land. Please know that I am totally in favor of the renovation of 114 Margin Street from a derelict garage to living quarters.The project does not impact my property adversely whatsoever. In fact,the opposite is true. I previously offered written support of this renovation to the local zoning board.Additionally,as co-chairperson of GESNA,the Greater Endicott Street Neighborhood Association (which oversees the area where 114 Margin is located),this project will be beneficial to the maintenance and aesthetics of my neighborhood. Furthermore, I am very familiar with the outstanding improvements Paula Pearce and Emily Stuart have executed at other locations in this neighborhood.They have my total and complete confidence when it comes to the rehabilitation of unsightly properties.Also, Paula Pearce is a valued member of the GESNA steering committee,which always has the best interests of the neighborhood as its main concern. It is my sincere hope that you will allow this renovation to proceed. Respectfully, Robert Femino 32 Endicott St.#2 Salem, MA 01970 (978)744-8327 y c�. Ilk Ml TV Y'1 r ,n •� .�: • . 4 , \ 2% � « ! ._ ? z v« � z � v \ © ; . ° « _ �.,��.� ,�^ r R � � � � ». `� max°: � ���' � '����� � �:+.�� __ :. e .; �... �r-w � �P�� fry. .. ,. r _,,,,P �^� ,'k:': w. '..i/pts�`n � .�_ � ��:. .�- �.>. i � �: 8 ry `G., �'. .� .' Y � � e- �--� ����� k 6 { �, , _{ _ � � �' J_ �" Y;i.I � r' ' �. 4 ' u �y1 T-_i%V - C� ..�.. -._ �.� .2 a��T�L b' Jn.va.y,V(i xi 4 .. w � � � i � _ �� � ✓ �;� j v — :. t � > w „. .,: x v ,- -- , „ .. .:, �� t,.m..... � - ,�:,... a.v G4wr. 'k F - � :..'u.. r,� m., '� If .. s s �Y s +es �..a�A+.:.Wr. � ,� fig,/ ���"� „��" p�G,• z��..�'ae...n ,�sa... '� �;�,.+r.11 f,� ': ,� rt fi N m� y€�/f '' A� !. Y �r E� �N t { i :rd 7 �� { (.`^ c {�� A t CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS INSPECTIONAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT 9 k THOMAS ST.PIERRE INSPECTIONAL SERVICES DIRECTOR /BUILDING COMMISSIONER KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL MAYOR 120 WASHINGTON STREET♦ SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TFL:978-745-9595 ♦ FAx:978-740-9846 Date: li September 7,2016 6 MARIA, LLC To: c/o Emily Stuart Address: i 1 Galloupes Terrace City/State/Zip: � Swampscott,MA 01907 t 114 Margin Street - - Re: LB-15-1193/Exterior Insulation Dear Ms. Stuart, You have asked if the Building Department would allow you to leave the existing brick surfaces exposed at the interior of your perimeter walls. The minimum standard for insulation would still need to be achieved(Massachusetts Stretch Energy Code: 780 CMR 115.AA).This would require an EIFS (Exterior Insulation Finishing System)or some other treatment of substantial thickness. The conditions of your Board of Appeals decision state that: [51 Exterior finishes of new construction shall be in harmony with the existing structure. The Board of Appeals would need to be satisfied with your exterior finish plan before the Building Department could consider any proposal for exterior work. Any proposal for such an alternative approach would require plans and specifications by an Architect and HERS Rater. Sincerely, Harry Wagg Assistant Building Inspector 978-619-5643 - hwagg@salem.com cc.T. St. Pierre,Bldg. Commissioner File cc � A CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS INSPECTIONAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT THOMAS ST.PIERRE INSPECTIONAL SERVICES DIRECTOR /BUILDING COMMISSIONER KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL MAYOR 120 WASHINGTON STREET♦ SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TEL:978-745-9595 ♦ FAx:978-740-9846 Date: I September 7,2016 To: [MARZA,LLC_ c/o Emily Stuart Address: 1 Galloupes Terrace 1 5?014(% CX3 PNvKL B/�tw Ci ylState/Zip: Swampscott,MA 01907 Re s 114 Margin Street L B 15-1193/Exterior Openings Dear Ms. Stuart, You have asked if the Building Department would allow a casement window,used as an Emergency Escape and Rescue Opening,to open over and beyond a property boundary line. The answer is no. The Building Department does not have the authority to grant you an easement over another piece of property. A review ofyour construction drawing and plot plan, however, raises a different issue. Because two of your exterior walls are within three feet of the lot lines,you are actually prohibited from having any windows on the North and West sides of the building. Your project involves the total renovation and change-of-use of an existing garage building into a single family dwelling. As such, your project must comply with applicable provisions of IBC- 2009 (the International Building Code). Table 602*of the Code establishes the fire-resistance rating requirements for exterior walls -based on fire separation distance. The fire separation distance is measured from the exterior building wall to the property line. At your property, where two walls are less than Y-0"from the lot lines,the Table requires a Ihour Fire-Resistance Rating.The existing brick walls satisfy the 1 hour requirement. Table 705.8** establishes the maximum area of exterior wall openings.The size and number of openings is based on fire separation distance and the degree of"opening protection"provided. Where the fire separation distance is less than 3'-0" (as confirmed by your plot-plan), then wall openings,of any size,are"not permitted". In summary: you are required to have escape openings in the proposed bedrooms, but you are not permitted to have openings in the bedroom walls as they are shown on your current floor plan. CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS INSPECTIONAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT THOMAS ST.PIERRE INSPECTION.IL SERVICES DIRECTOR /BUILDING COMMISSIONER KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL MAYOR 120 WASHINGTON STREET* SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970 T'EL:978-745-9595 4 FAX:978-740-9846 You have three possible courses of action: 1. Re-design the proposed floor plan and submit it to the Building Dept. for approval. 2. Submit"compliance alternatives"(to the Building Dept.) for approval. 3. Petition the BBRS (Board of Building Regulations and Standards)for approval of a variance. You will find additional information by searching on-line for"State Building Code Appeals Board—Mass. Gov". If you feel you are aggrieved by this order, you have the right to appeal to the Massachusetts Board of Building Regulations and Standards (BBRS)at One Ashburton Place/Boston/MA. Sincerely, Harry Wagg i F f Assistant Building Inspector 1 978-619-5643 - hwagg@salem.com *Chapter 6, Section 602.1 & **Chapter 7, Section 705.8.1 and cc. T. St. Pierre,Bldg. Commissioner File cc r CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS b INSPECTIONAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT THOMAS ST.PIERRE 1NSPECTIONAL SERVICES DIRECTOR /BUILDING COMMISSIONER KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL M.1YOR 120 WASHINGTON S"IREET♦ SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TEL:978-745-9595 ♦ FAx:978-740-9846 Dat : It Septemb_]1516 To: ` iviARzw,LLC - - - C•KAl t_Cbl f Iu c t ri ss c/o Emily Stuart Address: I 1 Galloupes Terrace City/State/Zip: j Swampscott,MA 01907 r — — S __ Re I ]B14 Margin treet ' 15-1193/Exterior Openings J Dear Ms. Stuart, Your project involves the change-of-use of an existing garage building to a single family dwelling. As such, your project must comply with applicable provisions of IBC- 2009 (the International Building Code). Because two of your exterior walls are within three feet of the lot lines, you are prohibited from having any windows on those sides of the building. Table 602* of the Code establishes the fire-resistance rating requirements for exterior walls. At your property, where two walls are less than 3'-0" from the lot lines, the Table requires a Ihour Fire-Resistance Rating. The existing brick walls satisfy the Ihour requirement. Table 705.8** establishes the maximum total area of exterior wall openings that can be allowed in those lhour walls. Where the fire separation distance is less than 3'-0" (as confirmed by your plot-plan), then wall openings, of any size, are "not permitted". Regarding your specific project: you are required to have escape and rescue openings in the proposed bedrooms,but you are not permitted to have openings in the bedroom walls as they are shown on your current floor plan. You are denied permission to continue to use the existing window openings, or to create new openings in the walls noted above. CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS INSPECTIONAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT e THOMAS ST.PIERRE INSPECTIONAL SERVICES DIRECTOR /BUILDING COMMISSIONER KIM 3ERLEY DRISCOLL MAYOR 120 WASHINGTON STREM*♦ SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TEL:978-745-9595 ♦ FAx:978-740-9846 You make seek relief from the Code requirement by appealing to the BBRS (Board of Building Regulations and Standards) for a variance. If you choose to pursue such an appeal, this Department will not oppose you. Sincerely, Harry Wagg Assistant Building Inspector 978-619-5643 hwagg@salem.com *Chapter 6, Section 602.1 & **Chapter 7, Section 705.8.1 cc. T. St. Pierre, Bldg. Commissioner File � w .4 CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS BOARD OF APPEAL 9a 29 P 50 120 WASHINGTON STREET♦ SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970 KIMBExLEYDRISCOLL TELE:978-745-9595 ♦ FAX:978-740-9846 FILE. tt Mnrox CITY GLERX, SALEM, MASS. June 29, 2015 Decision City of Salem Board of Appeals Petition of MARIA, LLC, seeking a Variance requesting relief from Sec. 4.1.1 Table ofDimensional,. Requirements from minimum lot area per dwelling unit to convert an existing garage into a dwelling unit. The petitioner is also seeking a Special Permit per Sec. 3.3.3 Nonconforming Structures of the Salem Zoning Ordinance, to alter the use of an existing nonconforming structure located at the property of 114 MARGIN STREET (Map 25 Lot 500)(112 Zoning District). A public hearing on the above Petition was opened on May 20, 2015 pursuant to M.G.L Ch. 40A, 5 11. The hearing was closed June with the following Salem Board of Appeals members present: Rebecca Curran (Chair), Peter A. Copelas,Tom Watkins,Jimmy Tsitsmos,James Hacker. The petitioner is seeking a Variance requesting relief from Sec. 4.1.1 Table to Dimensional Requirements from minimum lot area per dwelling unit and a Special Permit per Sec. 3.3.3 Nonconforming Structures to alter an existing nonconforming structure to provide for a substantially different purpose from an attached garage to serve as an additional dwelling unit. Statements of fact: 1. In the petition date-stamped May 20, 2015, the Petitioner requested a Variance requesting relief from Sec. 4.1.1 Table of Dimensional Requirements from minimum lot area per dwelling unit to allow a reduction in the minimum lot size per dwelling unit and Special Permit per Sec. 3.3.3 Nonconforming Structures of the Salem Zoning Ordinance to alter an existing non-conforming structure to provide for a substantially different purpose from an attached garage to serve as an additional dwelling unit. 2. Emily Stuart and Paula Pearce of Marza, LLC, petitioners,presented the petition.. 3. The petitioner proposes to convert an existing single-family home into 2 (two) dwelling units located in an existing attached garage. 4. The property is located in an R2 (Residential 2-Family) district. 5. There is a driveway with three (3) outdoor parking spaces on-site. 6. The petitioner requested a Variance from Sec. 4.1.1 Table of Dimensional Requirements requesting relief from minimum lot area per dwelling unit to allow two (2) dwelling units on a lot that is approximately 4,352 square feet. The Salem Zoning Ordinance requires 7,500 per dwelling unit. 7. The petitioner also requested a Special Permit per Section 3.3.3 Nonconforming Structures to provide for a substantially different purpose from an attached garage to serve as an additional dwelling unit. 8. The requested relief, if granted, would allow the Petitioner convert and existing single-family home into two (2) dwelling units on an existing non-conforming lot and structure. • r } City of Salem Board of Appeals June 29,2015 Project: 114 Margin Street Page 2 of 3 9. At the public hearing three (3) members of the public spoke in favor of and none (0) spoke in opposition to, the petition. The Salem Board of Appeals, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the public hearing, and after thorough review of the petition, including the application narrative and plans, and the Petitioner's presentation and public testimony, makes the following findings that the proposed project meets the provisions of the City of Salem Zoning Ordinance: Findings for Variance: 1. The special conditions and circumstances that especially affecting land,building or structure involved generally not affecting other lands,buildings, and structures in the same district is its unique size and structure. In particular, the existing structure is 1320 square feet and has no functional use to the property. 2. The literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the applicant as the building is large and was once used as a commercial space is not typically attached to a single family structure and is not zoned for a non- residential use. 3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good, and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the ordinance. Findings for Special Permit 1. The proposed change use of a non-conforming structure would not be more substantially detrimental than the existing non-conforming structure to the impact on the social, economic or community needs served by the proposal. 2. There are no impacts on traffic flow and safety, including parking and loading as there are three (3) on-site parking spaces that conform to the parking requirements of the Salem Zoning Ordinance. 3. The capacity of the utilities is not affected by the project. 4. There are no impacts on the natural enyironment,.including drainage. 5. The proposal improves neighborhood character as it improves the property. 6. The potential fiscal impact,including impact on the City tax base is positive. On the basis of the above statements of facts and findings, the Salem Board of Appeals voted five (Rebecca Curran (Chair), Peter A. Copelas,Jimmy Tsitsinos, Tom Watkins,James Hacker) in favor and none (0) opposed, to grant a Variance per Sec. 4.1.1 Table of Dimensional Reguinments from minimum lot area per dwelling unit to convert an existing garage into a dwelling unit and a Special Permit per Sec. 3.3.3 Nonconforming Structures of the Salem Zoning Ordinance, to alter the use of an existing nonconforming structure subject to the following terms, conditions and safeguards: 1. The Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. City of Salem Board of Appeals June 29,2015 Project: 114 Margin Street Page 3 of 3 2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted to and approved by the Building Commissioner 3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. 4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to beginning any construction. 5. Exterior finishes of new construction shall be in harmony with the existing structure. 6. A Certificate of Inspection shall be obtained. 7. A Certificate of Occupancy shall be obtained. 8. Petitioner is to obtain approval from any City Board or Commission having jurisdiction including, but not limited to, the Planning Board. Rebecca Curran, Chau Board of Appeals A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appea!from this decision,if any, shall be made pursuant to Seaton 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A,and shall be filed within 20 days of filing of this deacon in the ofice of the Gty Clerk. Pursuant to the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 1 J, the Variance or Special Permitgranted herein sball not take effect until a ropy of the decision bearing the certificate of the City Ckrk has been filed with the Essex South Registry of Deeds. �tr1��.du—�F—LY1.L I hereby Ce,'Wf tha4 20 days ham expired*am t;ta dmte this Instrument Was mcelved,and Md NO APPEAL has bVen tiled In this o6t1 A Teue Cagy _ ATT'EVr TY,G ,IK, Eslarst,fav: a' CITY OF SALEM MASSACHUSETTS , BOARD OF APPEAL 4`MIN6D�� 120 WASHINGTON STREET♦ SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970 29 P I SQ YimBERLEY DRiscoLL TELE:978-745-9595 ♦ FAX:978-740-9846 FILE I1 MAYOR CITY GUM, SALEM. MASS June 29, 2015 Decision City of Salem Board of Appeals Petition of MARZA,LLC, seeking a Variance requesting relief from Sec. 4.1.1 Table ofDimensional Requirements from minimum lot area per dwelling unit to convert an existing garage into a dwelling unit. The petitioner is also seeking a Special Permit per Sec. 3.3.3 Nonconforming Structures of the Salem Zoning Ordinance, to alter the use of an existing nonconforming structure located at the property of 114 MARGIN STREET (Map 25 Lot 500)(R2 Zoning District). A public hearing on the above Petition was opened on May 20, 2015 pursuant to M.G.L Ch. 40A, 4 11. The hearing was closed June with the following Salem Board of Appeals members present: Rebecca Curran (Chair),Peter A. Copelas,Tom Watkins,Jimmy Tsitsinos,James Hacker. The petitioner is seeking a Variance requesting relief from Sec. 4.1.1 Table to Dimensional Requirements from minimum lot area per dwelling unit and a Special Permit per Sec. 3.3.3 Nonconforming Siructuirs to alter an existing nonconforming structure to provide for a substantially different purpose from an attached garage to serve as an additional dwelling unit. Statements of fact: 1. In the petition date-stamped May 20, 2015, the Petitioner requested a Variance requesting relief from Sec. 4.1.1 Table of Dimensional Requirements from minimum lot area per dwelling unit to allow a reduction in the minimum lot size per dwelling unit and Special Permit per Sec. 3.3.3 Nonconforming Structures of the Salem Zoning Ordinance to alter an existing non-conforming structure to provide for a substantially different purpose from an attached garage to serve as an additional dwelling unit. 2. Emily Stuart and Paula Pearce of Marza,LLC,petitioners,presented the petition. 3. The petitioner proposes to convert an existing single-family home into 2 (two) dwelling units located in an existing attached garage. 4. The property is located in an R2 (Residential 2-Family) district. 5. There is a driveway with three (3) outdoor parking spaces on-site. 6. The petitioner requested a Variance from Sec. 4.1.1 Table of Dimensional Requirements requesting relief from minimum lot area per dwelling unit to allow two (2) dwelling units on a lot that is approximately 4,352 square feet. The Salem Zoning Ordinance requires 7,500 per dwelling unit. 7. The petitioner also requested a Special Permit per Section 3.3.3 Nonconforming Structures to provide for a substantially different purpose from an attached garage to serve as an additional dwelling unit. 8. The requested relief, if granted, would allow the Petitioner convert and existing single-family home into two (2) dwelling units on an existing non-conforming lot and structure. G' City of Salem Board of Appeals June 29,2015 Project: 114 Margin Street Page 2 of 3 9. At the public hearing three (3) members of the public spoke in favor of and none (0) spoke in opposition to, the petition. The Salem Board of Appeals, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the public hearing, and after thorough review of the petition, inducting the application narrative and plans, and the Petitioner's presentation and public testimony, makes the following findings that the proposed project meets the provisions of the City of Salem Zoning Ordinance: Findings for Variance: 1. The special conditions and circumstances that especially affecting land, building or structure involved generally not affecting other lands, buildings, and structures in the same district is its unique size and structure. In particular, the existing structure is 1320 square feet and has no functional use to the property. 2. The literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the applicant as the building is large and was once used as a commercial space is not typically attached to a single family structure and is not zoned for a non-residential use. 3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good, and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the ordinance. Findings for Special Permit 1. The proposed change use of a non-conforming structure would not be more substantially detrimental than the existing non-conforming structure to the impact on the social, economic or community needs served by the proposal. 2. There are no impacts on traffic flow and safety, including parking and loading as there are three (3) on-site parking spaces that conform to the parking requirements of the Salem Zoning Ordinance. 3. The capacity of the utilities is not affected by the project. 4. There are no impacts on the natural environment,including drainage. 5. The proposal improves neighborhood character as it improves the property. 6. The potential fiscal impact,including impact on the City tax base is positive. On the basis of the above statements of facts and findings, the Salem Board of Appeals voted five (Rebecca Curran (Chair), Peter A. Copelas,Jimmy Tsitsinos, Tom Watkins,James Hacker) in favor and none (0) opposed, to grant a Variance per Sec. 4.1.1 Table of Dimensional Requirements from minimum lot area per dwelling unit to convert-an existing garage into a dwelling unit and a Special Permit per Sec. 3.3.3 Nonconforming Structures of the Salem Zoning Ordinance, to alter the use of an existing nonconfomung structure subject to the following terms,'conditions and safeguards: 1. The Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. " r City of Salem Board of Appeals June 29,2015 Project: 114 Margin Street Page 3 of 3 2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted to and approved by the Building Commissioner 3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. 4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to beginning any construction. 5. Exterior finishes of new construction shall be in harmony with the existing structure. 6. A Certificate of Inspection shall be obtained. 7. A Certificate of Occupancy shall be obtained. 8. Petitioner is to obtain approval from any City Board or Commission having jurisdiction including,but not limited to, the Planning Board. Rebecca Curran, Chair Board of Appeals A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days of f:b'ng of this decision in the office of the G'ty Ckrk. Pursuant to the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Pemritgranted herein shall not take�ect until a copy of the decision bearing the certificate of the Cs'ry Clerk has been filed with the Essex South Registry of Deeds. BUTTERWORTH & O'TOOLE, INC. P.O. BOX 8294 � oo SALEM. MA 01971-8294 r � ADJUSTERS/APPRAISERS I FOR INSURANCE COMPANIES ONLY TELEPHONE (978)741-5731 FAX (978)740-9109 October 15, 1999 FORM OF NOTICE OF CASUALTY LOSS TO BUILDING UNDER MASS. GEN. LAWS, CH. 139, SEC. 3B TO: Building Commissioner or Board of Health or Inspector of Buildings Board of Selectmen City/Town Hall City/Town Hall ADDRESSES Salem, MA 01970 Salem, MA 01970 RE : Insured: Jack Castle Address : 114 Margin Street Salem, MA 01970 Policy No. : VZA 4059 7100 Loss of : 9/29/99 File or Claim No. : 97-1646 Claim has been made involving loss, damage or destruction of the above captioned property, which may either exceed $1, 000 . 00 or cause Mass. Gen. Laws, Chapter 143, Section 6 to be applicable. If any notice under Mass. Gen. Laws, Ch. 139, Sec. 3B is appropriate, please direct it to the attention of the writer and include a reference to the captioned insured, location, policy number, date of loss and claim or file number. If no reply is received from your office within ten days, we will assume you have no liens of any type against this property and we will recommend to the insuring company that this claim is paid. James Ranta Adjuster Certificate Number: B-15-230 Permit Number: B-15-230 Commonwealth of Massachusetts City of Salem This is to Certify that theSingle Family Building located at Building Type 114 MARGIN STREET in the Ci o Salem Address Town/City Name IS HEREBY GRANTED A PERMANENT CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY 114 MARGIN STREET UNIT i EMILYSTUART/PAULA PEARCE This Permit is granted in conformity with the Statutes and Ordinances relating thereto, and expires ---.--------Not Applicableunless sooner suspended or revoked. Expiration Date . �X Y Issued On: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 w Commonwealth of Massachusetts !Llr City of Salem q 9 120 Washington St,3rd Floor Salem,MA 01970(978)745-9595 x5641 Return card to Building Division for Certificate of Occupancy Permit B-15-230 PERMIT TO B U I I_ D FEE PAID:: $2$280.00 DATE ISSUED: 4/2/2015 This certifies that MARIA, LLC has permission to erect, alter, or demolish a building 114 MARGIN STREET Map/Lot: 250500-0 as follows: Renovation REBUILD EXTERIOR STEPS (SIDE PORCH); RENOVATE; KITCHEN, FIRST FLOOR HALF BATH, SECOND FLOOR BATHROOM; INSTALL NEW WINDOWS. Contractor Name: JUSTIN WILLIAMS DBA: Contractor License No: CS-106394 4/2/2015 Building Official Date This permit shall be deemed abandoned and invalid unless the work authorized by this permit is commenced within six months Ir issuance.The Building Official may grant one or more extensions not to exceed six months each upon written request. All work authorized by this permit shall conform to the approved application and the approved construction documents for which this permit has been granted. All construction,alterations and changes of use of any building and structures shall be in compliance with the local zoning by-laws and codes. This permit shall be displayed in a location clearly visible from access street or road and shall be maintained open for public inspection for the entire duration of the work until the completion of the same. The Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all applicable signatures by the Building and Fire Officials are provided on this permit. HIC#: 173012 "Persons contracting with unregistered contractors do not have access to the guaranp fund"(as set forth in MGL c.142A). Restrictions: Building plans are to be available on site. All Permit Cards are the property of the PROPERTY OWNER. Commonwealth of Massachusetts + ' y C Citv of Salem ¢ 120 Washington St,3rd Floor Salem,MA 01970(978)745-9595 x5641 .d Return card to Building Division for Certificate of Occupancy Structure CITY OF SALEM BUILDING PERMIT v� Excavation~ PERMIT TO BE POSTED IN THE WINDOW Footing INSPECTION RECORD Foundation Mechanical 2 L� Insulation I( INSPECTION: By _ DATE Chimney/Smoke hamber Final i. umbing/Gas Rough:Plumbing Rough:Gas 2 Final �L gc, /f Electrical service Rough Fire Department Preliminary Fin Health Department Preliminary Final