32 MARCH STREET - BUILDING INSPECTION _R 32 MARCH STREET
I
(1�i# Of �$ttl=, �HaSWCIJUUHs kN 16 6 2e PN BB
oz s PaxrD of '4pcttl
MU
�NMna ~ WT VLERR.tf LfM. FAiS.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF MARK PETIT FOR A VARIANCE AT
32 MARCH STREET R-2
A hearing on this petition was held on June 15, 1988 with the following Board
Members present: James Fleming, Chairman; Luzinski, Nutting, Strout and
Associate Member Labrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and
others and Notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening
News in Accordance with the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioners, owners of the property, are requesting a variance from lot size,
frontage and setbacks to allow division of property into two lots and to
construct single family on each lot. This property is located in a R-2
district.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the
Board that:
a. special conditions and circm stances exist which especially affect
the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally
affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the sane district;
b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner;
c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at
the hearing, and after viewing the plans makes the following findings of fact:
1. There was no opposition presented at the hearing.
2. Approval of this petition would enhance the neighborhood.
3. New lot size would be larger than existing abutting lots.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at
the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property
but do not affect the district generally;
2. Literal enforcement of the Ordinance would involve substantial
hardship to the petitioner;
3. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the
Variance requested, subject to the following conditions:
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF MARK PETIT FOR A VARIANCE AT
32 MARCH STREET, SALEM
Page Two
1. To obtain Building Permits.
2. Comply with State & Local Fire Ordinances.
3. Acquire proper numbering from the City Assessors.
4. To be built as per plans submitted with deeded rights of way.
5. A Certificate of Occupancy be obtained.
GRANTED
yy--
Peter Strout, Member
Zoning Board of Appeal
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
APPEAL FROM THIS DECISION. IF ANY, SHALL BE MADE PURSUANT TO SECTI0:1 17 OF THE MASS.
GENERAL LAWS. CHAPTER 503. AND SHALL BE FILED WITHIN 20 DAl"S AFTER THE DATE OF FILING
OF 1di3 DECIS!CN IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK.
o ;r:-. IT '..^. !:f S. GE'lE^AL L.,,i.•. v; SFF i en: EP!,i
. ..,. a C. �ritR w . SECT 6:;Y ll. THE \FlRIA.`!Ci. OR _f li;.. F. I
f iY. ' -_I HC4-Pi. Cm,L R .- T=.'!E EFFECT UNTIL A COPY Cr THE rrRT
C", TH IF ,.PP'. L HAS CLEN FILE. .::r,' IF EN U':, '!R L. IS
RECO" EJ 1'1 15. S.�JTH ESSEX REGISTR,' G E:._ '':\ II'DC`:::D 0/f P iW i,A:2E OF THE O"nNER
OF RECORD OR IS RI-CORDED AND NGi ED ON THE G',;;4ERS C RTIRCAIE OF TITLE.
BOARD OF APPEAL
JULIn
1 9 ?948
—- - ----- ------- � as
ryr S
r
s