Loading...
14-16 MALL STREET - BUILDING INSPECTION 14-16 MALI STREET Y ry �o C0ND'T,� Citp of *aiem, Baggarbugeto �, °� +_ ,� Public Propertp ]Department �B��NINEW �3uilbing Mepartment (One 6alem Oreen 745-9595 (tCxt. 380 William H. Munroe Director of Public Property Inspector of Buildings Zoning Enforcement Officer June 29, 1988 Kevin R. Harvey, Councillor 35 Andrew St . Unit 111 Salem, MA. 01970 RE: 14 tall St _, ,Sa-1 m'` MA. Dear Mr. Harvey, At your request , this office investigated the above referenced property for possible violation of Zoning Ordinance, operating a business in a residential zone. Our investigation of said property showed no signs of a business there, what we found was a business card in a hall window, no business signs or hour of operation visible. Property was locked up, no names on door or any mail boxes . :Respectfully, / James D. Santo Assistant Building Inspector JDS/eaf ALEXANDER & FEMINO ATTORNEYS AT LAW ONE BROADWAY BEVERLY, MASSACHUSETTS 01915 LEONARD F. FEMINO TELEPHONE THOMAS J. ALEXANDER (617) 9211990 March 17, 1987 Mr. Edgar J. Paquin Assistant Building Inspector City of Salem One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 o RE: Salem Common Condominium William and Mall Street Salem, MA Dear Mr. Paquin: This letter will serve to confirm our phone: conversation of. March 17 , 1987 ,—wherein I=stated=that=the above five properties were held_ in common ownership By`the Salem Common Condominium which was created by Master Deed dated October 27 , 1986, and recorded with the Essex South District Registry of Deeds in Book 8591, Page 319 . The dashed lines showing the phases on the site plan (copy enclosed) are there for strictly administrative purposes and do not indicate separate ownership of the lots. Under the Rules and Regulations of the Registry of Deeds only solid lines indicate separate ownership of lots, and the Registry , would not have accepted this plan for recordation if separate lots were .being created by said dashed lines as that would require a M.G. L. Chapter 41, Section 81P endorsement ("Approval Not Required") by the Planning Board. I hope this will serve to clear up any confusion that may have been created by the phasing of this condominium. Very truly ,yours, 7 Thomas -, Alegi nder TJA/dh cc: Michael O' Brien, City Solicitor David T. Ramsey RECEIVE Ctu of qalenl, fflassar4usetts Avar '81 OCT 19 P4 :22 CITY CLERK'S OFFICE DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ROBERT BRAMBLE, TRUSTEE OF ALLYN REALTY *W'fF6V-SS A SPECIAL PERMIT TO CONVERT 14-16`.1414LL STREET INTO FOUR CONDOMINIUM UNITS A final hearing on this petition was held on October 14, 1981 with the 4 following Board Members present: Mr. Douglas Hopper, Chairman; Messrs. Hacker and Piemonte and Associate Members Lusinski and Martineau. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. The Petitioner has requested a Special Permit to convert the existing four family dwelling at this property into four condominium units. This proposed condominium conversion is covered by the terms of the City of Salem's condominium conversion ordinance. The Special Permit that has been requested may therefore be granted only upon a finding by the Board of Appeals . that (1) the grant of the Special Permit will not adversely impact upon the city's existing stock of rental units for low and moderate income families and elderly people on fixed income, (2) that the grant of the Special Permit -is not contrary to the City'd Master Plan, and (3) the grant of the Special Permit will not have an adverse effect on the neighborhood. The Board of Appeals, after considering the evidence at the hearing, and after viewing the property makes the following findings of fact: 1. The owner has .made a substantial financial. investment;:in this property and has made capital improvements -in what is-:a building which has historical significance and which was in need of repairs. 2. The proposed conversion of this property to four condominium units in no way conflicts with the Master Plan of the City of Salem. 3. The conversion of the property to condominiums-will havenegligible, impact on the existing stock of rental units in the City of Salem for the elderly and for families of low and moderate income. 4. The property is vacant. Thus, no hardship is caused by the proposed condominium conversion to any tenants. On the basis of the above findings of fact and on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Board of Appeals by a 4 to 1 vote (Mr. Hacker voted , present) concluded that the proposed condominium conversion is in harmony with the condominium conversion ordinance of the City of Salem. Accordingly, the Board voted in favor of granting the requested Special Permit in accordance with the following terms and conditions: 1. Four parking spaces shall be maintained at the site. 2. All construction, including landscaping and the fence at the site shall be in accordance with the plans submitted to the Board. Page 2 RE.GFl4r DECISION - OCTOBER 14, 1981 - ROBERT BRAMBLE '81 CCT 19 P 4 :22 CITY CLE4K'Q OFFICE . SALN, Ns;iS: 3. Because the building was vacant at the time this petition was filed, the Petitioner will not be required to allow six months to elapse before commencing any work in furtherance of the condominium conversion. The Petitioner may commence such work 20 days after the date of he filing of this decision. •-'-">b`-Ltd; -k i. `Anthony M. Feehlrfy APPEAL T .. ... -. ..,- ... !7 CF T-. t•:.J. GE'r:EPAL U.-IS.-!;l-'- .•.., f 'J . r -......It., w G :'S !. I n ❑iE �_; i, •OF l..Ft-` i;f ilio G!'.'t c:--.:.Tills U. - DMAM J HE"E 't, SI!-UL : , 1 L f .r'.., t. E.:t fliGA':9„11.LF •.!r G:IY '..a: II"AT ..? :AYS Hn E A,:_nL ttMITH4 IF U-Iid AN9" t F. 'H2 FILE, 1 'AT tr ' S E- -EN O!S I --0 .R - ED IS - ':x'L::fit IN.TYE S�uTB EiScn S. ST"Y or �.cW h17 !......•._,. �J..__., t•.c .. ...c Cr TF._ C!:Ct:R - OFTMIL1'lD)DIA 1&RECO Mra ACID IJOTED Ott THE OWNER'S CEd'i IF LATE OF TITLE BOARD OF APPEAL A COPY OF THIS DECISION AND PLANS HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK