MINUTES - Regular - 10/13/2016
CITY OF SALEM
OCTOBER 13, 2016
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
“Know Your Rights Under the Open Meeting Law, M.G.L. Chapter 30A ss. 18-25, and
City Ordinance Sections 2-2028 through 2-2033.”
Assistive Listening System Now Available for City Council Meetings.
Those interested in utilizing these devices for meetings at 93 Washington Street may
contact the City Clerk Cheryl LaPointe at 978-619-5610 or clapointe@salem.com.
A Regular Meeting of the City Council held in the Council Chamber on Thursday,
October 13, 2016 at 7:00 P.M. for the purpose of transacting any and all business. Notice of
this meeting was posted on October 11, 2016 at 1:09 P.M. This meeting is being taped and
is live on S.A.T.V.
Councillor Dibble arrived at 7:03 PM
Council President Turiel presided.
Councillor McCarthy moved to dispense with the reading of the record of the previous
meeting. It was so voted.
President Turiel requested that everyone please rise to recite the Pledge of Allegiance.
PUBLIC TESTIMONY
1. Kate Fox, Destination Salem – Holyoke Square, Tour Bus Parking
2. John Carr, 7 River Street – Zoning of Bridge Street (Webb)
3. Jennifer Firth, President Historical Salem – Zoning of Bridge Street (Webb)
4. Ruth Griffin, 24 Norman Street – Holyoke Square Tour Bus Parking
Councillor McCarthy requested and received unanimous consent for suspension of the rules to
allow public testimony to go beyond the 15 minutes.
5. Tim Doggett, 9 Lynde Street – Zoning of Bridge Street (Webb)
2
OCTOBER 13, 2016
#561 – (#558) HEARING CONDUIT ON DERBY/CENTRAL STREET
A hearing was held on the Order of National Grid to install a conduit on Derby / Central
Streets.
Appearing in favor:
Sabitah Mahabier Sheehy, Representative of National Grid stated this conduit is
Necessary to provide service.
nd
Councillor McCarthy asked what the time table is. November 2 would be good.
There was no one appearing opposed.
Councillor McCarthy moved that the hearing be closed. It was so voted.
Councillor McCarthy moved that it be granted. It was so voted.
(#507) – HEARING EXTENDED HOURS OF OPERATION FOR DOMINO’S
A hearing was held on the request from Domino’s located at 4 Canal Street for extended
hours of operation. Requested hours be until 1:00 A.M. Sunday through Thursday and until 2:00
A.M. Friday through Saturday.
Appearing in Favor:
Jeanie Cashman, Supervisor of Domino’s, she stated that they would like the extended
hours of operation as they have just remodeled the building and added seating. There are dining
places open until 2:00 AM.
Councillor Dibble stated he is not in favor of being open until 2:00 AM. There are safety
issues. He wants an opinion from the Solicitor.
Councillor Famico questioned the petitioner.
Jeanie Cashman stated the delivery is until 2:00 AM dinning in until 11:00 AM. Domino’s has
had a Common Victualers License for 25 Years.
Councillor McCarthy moved the hearing be continued until the next regular Council meeting
on October 27, 2016.
3
OCTOBER 13, 2016
(#000)– APPOINTMENTS TO THE TRAFFIC AND PARKING COMMISSION
Held from the last meeting, the Mayor’s appt. of following to serve as members of the Traffic
and Parking Commission with the following terms to expire, were confirmed by unanimous roll call
vote of 11 yeas, 0 nays, 0 absent. Councillors Dibble, Eppley, Famico, Furey, Gerard, Lovely,
McCarthy, Milo, Ryan, Sargent and Turiel were recorded as voting in the affirmative.
NAME/ADDRESS TERM TO EXPIRE
Jamie Metsch, 18 Oliver St., Salem (Business Seat) September 29, 2019
Eric Papetti, 11 Symonds St., Salem (Resident Seat) September 29, 2017
Nicholas Downing, 10 Andrew St., Salem (Resident Seat) September 29, 2018
Councillor McCarthy requested and received unanimous consent for suspension of the rules to
allow the appointed to speak. There were no objections.
#562 – APPOINTMENT OF ATTORNEY TANYA STEPASIUK TO THE TRAFFIC & PARKING
COMMISSION
The Mayor’s appointment of Attorney Tanya Stepasiuk, 10 Burnside St., to serve as a
member of the Traffic and Parking Commission with a term to expire on October 13, 2017, was
held under the rules until the next regular council meeting.
#563 – AUTHORIZE MAYOR TO PURCHASE PROPERTY AT 289 DERBY STREET
The following Order recommended by the Mayor was referred to the Committee on
Administration and Finance co-posted with Committee of the Whole.
ORDERED: The Mayor is hereby authorized, on behalf of the City of Salem, to purchase
property located at 289 Derby Street, at the cost of One Million Four Hundred Thousand
($1.4 Million) Dollars. Said land shall be subject to an open space preservation restriction.
#564 – BOND ORDER IN THE AMOUNT OF $1.4 MILLION FOR 289 DERBY STREET
The following Order recommended by the Mayor was referred to the Committee on
Administration and Finance co-posted with Committee of the Whole.
BOND ORDER: That the sum of One Million Four Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1,400,000)
be and hereby is appropriated to pay costs for the following Community Preservation Act (CPA)
project:
4
OCTOBER 13, 2016
Purpose Amount
Acquisition of 289 Derby Street for Recreation $1,400,000.00
Purposes
And for the payment of all costs incidental and related thereto, and that to meet said
appropriation the Treasurer, with the approval of the Mayor, is authorized to borrow said amount
under and pursuant to MGL Chapter 44, Section 7 (3), Chapter 44B, or pursuant to any other
enabling authority and to issue bonds or notes of the City therefore.
FURTHER ORDERED, that any premium received by the City upon the sale of any bonds or
notes approved by this vote, less any such premium applied to the payment of the costs of
issuance of such bonds or notes, may be applied to the payment of costs approved by this vote in
accordance with Chapter 44, Section 20 of the General Laws, thereby reducing the amount
authorized to be borrowed to pay such costs by a like amount.
FURTHER ORDERED, that the Treasurer is authorized to file an application to qualify under
Chapter 44A of the Massachusetts General Laws, and all bonds of the City issued under the
pursuant hereto, and to provide such information and execute such documents as may be required
in connection therewith.
#565 – APPROPRIATION TO CPA – 289 DERBY STREET DESIGN AND COSTS
The following Order recommended by the Mayor, was referred to the Committee on
Administration and Finance co-posted with Committee of the Whole.
ORDERED: That One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.00) is hereby appropriated
within the CPA Funds for FY 2017 to the accounts listed below in accordance with the
recommendation of Her Honor the Mayor
FY FUND FUND NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
2017 2001 General Fund CPA-289 Derby St. Design & Costs $100,000
5
OCTOBER 13, 2016
#566 – APPROPRIATION FOR RETIREMENT STAGBILIZATION FUND – VACATION /SICK
LEAVE BUYBACK ACCOUNT
The following Order recommended by the Mayor, was adopted under suspension of the
rules.
ORDERED: That the sum of Nine Thousand Four Hundred and Five Dollars and Sixty-Nine
Cents ($9,405.69) is hereby appropriated in the “Retirement Stabilization Fund – Vacation /Sick
Leave Buyback” Account to be expended for the FY 2017 contractual buyback listed below in
accordance with the recommendation of Her Honor the Mayor.
Nancy Haskell School Dept. $9,405.69
#567 – DONATION FROM FRIENDS OF THE COUNCIL ON AGING TO THE COUNCIL ON
AGING
The following Order recommended by the Mayor, was adopted.
ORDERED: To accept the donation(s) listed below totaling Three Thousand Two Hundred
and Nine Dollars ($3,209.00). These funds will be deposited into the funds listed below in
accordance with the recommendation of Her Honor the Mayor.
From Fund Name Amount
Friends of the COA COA Donation Fund $3,209.00
Councillor Furey assumed the chair.
#568 – ORDINANCE AMENDING TRAFFIC HANDICAP PARKING CABOT STREET
Councillor Turiel introduced the following Order, which was adopted for first passage.
In the year two thousand and sixteen
An Ordinance to amend an Ordinance relative to Traffic
Be it ordained by the City Council of the City of Salem as follows:
Section 1. Chapter 42, Section 50B – “Handicap Parking, Limited Time” is hereby amended
by adding the following:
Cabot Street, in front of #40 for a distance of twenty (20) feet, “Handicap Parking, Tow
Zone”
Section 2. This Ordinance shall take effect as provided by City Charter.
6
OCTOBER 13, 2016
Councillor Turiel resumed the Chair.
#569 – DISPOSITION OF CITY OWNED PARCEL LOCATED AT 297 BRIDGE STREET
RECEIVED AFTER THE DEADLINE OF TUESDAY NOON UNDER SUSPENSION OF THE
RULES.
Councillor Famico introduced the following Order, which was referred to the Committee of
the Whole.
ORDERED: Prior to the disposition of City-owned parcel at 297 Bridge Street
1) The Mayor shall receive authorization from the City Council by a two-thirds vote prior to
executing a deed conveying the parcel;
2) A proposed deed restriction shall be prepared by the City Solicitor and submitted to the
City Council for approval prior to the disposition of the parcel for at least fifty years; and
3) The City Solicitor shall prepare and submit to the City Council, prior to the disposition of
the parcel, a condition of the sale requiring that the Planning Board not take action on
site plan review for a redevelopment proposal involving the parcel until after it has
received a recommendation from the Design Review Board concerning the design of the
project
#570 –(#398) CREATING AN ORDINANCE RELATIVE TO REDUCING THE USE OF PLASTIC
BAGS
Councillor Gerard offered the following report for the Committee on Public Health, Safety
and Environment co-posted with the Committee of the Whole. It was voted to accept the report and
adopt the recommendation.
The Committee on Public Health, Safety and Environment co-posted with the Committee of
the Whole to whom was referred the matter of Creating an Ordinance relative to reducing the use
of plastic bags in Salem has considered said matter and would recommend that the matter remain
in Committee.
#571 – (#557, 439) REZONING OF 293-297 BRIDGE STREET TO B-4 (BUSINESS
WHOLESALE & AUTOMOTIVE)
Councillor McCarthy offered the following report for the Committee of the Whole. It was
voted to accept the report and adopt the recommendation.
The Committee of the Whole to whom was referred the matter of the Planning Board’s
Recommendation relative to Re-Zoning of #293 & #297 Bridge Street to B-4 (Business Wholesale
and Automotive) has considered said matter and would recommend it brought to the full council.
7
OCTOBER 13, 2016
Councillor Famico moved for first passage by roll call vote. It was adopted for first passage
by a roll call vote of 9 yeas, 2 nays, 0 absent. Councillors Dibble, Eppley, Famico, Furey, Gerard,
McCarthy, Milo, Ryan and Turiel were recorded as voting in the affirmative. Councillors Lovely and
Sargent were recorded as voting in the negative.
#572 – ELECTION WARRANT FOR PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION
City Clerk submitting the Election Warrant for the State’s Presidential Election to be held on
November 8, 2016.
CITY OF SALEM
ELECTION ORDER
To the Constables of the City of Salem
GREETINGS:
In the name of the Commonwealth, you are hereby required to notify and warn the inhabitants of said city or town who
are qualified to vote in the State Election to vote at the following locations:
WARD ONE
PRECINCT ONE Bentley School, Memorial Drive
PRECINCT TWO Community Room, 135 Lafayette Street
WARD TWO
PRECINCT ONE St. John’s Parish Hall, St. Peter Street
PRECINCT TWO St. John’s Parish Hall, St. Peter Street
WARD THREE
PRECINCT ONE Salem High School Auditorium, 77 Willson Street
PRECINCT TWO Salem High School Auditorium, 77 Willson Street
WARD FOUR
PRECINCT ONE Witchcraft Heights School Gymnasium, 1 Frederick Street
PRECINCT TWO Witchcraft Heights School Gymnasium, 1 Frederick Street
WARD FIVE
PRECINCT ONE Saltonstall School Auditorium, 211 Lafayette Street
PRECINCT TWO Saltonstall School Auditorium, 211 Lafayette Street
WARD SIX
PRECINCT ONE Bates School, Liberty Hill Avenue
PRECINCT TWO Park and Recreation Dept., Mack Park
WARD SEVEN
PRECINT ONE Salem State Enterprise Center, 121 Loring Avenue
PRECINT TWO Salem State Enterprise Center, 121 Loring Avenue
On TUESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBVER, 2016, from 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM for the following purpose:
To cast their votes in the State Election for the candidates for the following offices and questions:
8
OCTOBER 13, 2016
ELECTION OF PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT………………….FOR THIS COMMONWEALTH
REPRESENTATIVE IN CONGRESS,……………………………………..SIXTH DISTRICT
COUNCILLOR………………………………………………………………..FIFTH DISTRICT
SENATOR IN GENERAL COURT………………………………………….SECOND DISTRICT
REPRESENTATIVE IN GENERAL COURT………………………………SEVENTH DISTRICT
SHERIFF………………………………………………………………………ESSEX COUNTY
QUESTION 1: LAW PROPOSED BY INTITIATIVE PETITION
Do you approve of a law summarized below, on which no vote was taken by the Senate or the House of
Representatives on or before May 3, 2016?
SUMMARY
This proposed law would allow the state Gaming Commission to issue one additional category 2 license, which would
permit operation of a gaming establishment with no table games and not more than 1,250 slot machines. The
proposed law would authorize the Commission to request applications for additional license to be granted to a gaming
establishment located on property that is (i) at least four acres in size: (ii) adjacent to and within 1,500 feet of a race
track, including the track’s additional facilities, such as the track, grounds, paddocks, barns, auditorium, amphitheatre,
and bleachers; (iii) where a horse racing meeting may physically be help; (iv) where a horse racing meeting shall have
been hosted; and (v) not separated from the race track by a highway or railway.
A YES VOTE would permit the state Gaming Commission to license one additional slot machine gaming
establishment at a location that meets certain conditions specified in the law.
A NO VOTE would make no change in current laws regarding gaming.
QUESTION 2; LAW PROPOSED BY INITIATIVE PETITION
Do you approve of a law summarized below, on which no vote was taken by the Senate or the House of
Representatives on or before May 3, 2016?
SUMMARY
This proposed law would allow the state Board of Elementary and Secondary Education to approve up to 12 new
charter schools or enrollment expansions in existing charter schools each year. Approvals under this law could expand
statewide charter school enrollment by up to 1% of the total statewide public school enrollment each year. New
charters and enrollment expansions approved under this law would be exempt from existing limits on the number of
charter schools, the number of students enrolled in them, and the amount of local school districts’ spending allocated
to them.
If the Board received more than 12 applications in a single year from qualified applicants, then the proposed law would
require it to give priority to proposed charter schools or enrollment expansions in districts where student performance
on statewide assessments is in the bottom 25% of all districts in the previous two years and where demonstrated
parent demand for additional public school options is greatest.
New charter schools and enrollment expansions approved under this proposed law would be subject to the same
approval standards as other charter schools, and to recruitment, retention, and multilingual outreach requirements that
currently apply to some charter schools. Schools authorized under this law would be subject to annual performance
reviews according to standards established by the Board.
The proposed law would take effect on January 1, 2017.
A YES VOTE would allow for up to 12 approvals each year of either new charter schools or expanded enrollments
in existing charter schools, but not to exceed 1% of the statewide public school enrollment.
9
OCTOBER 13, 2016
A NO VOTE would make no change in current laws regarding gaming.
QUESTION 3; LAW PROPOSED BY INITIATIVE PETITION
Do you approve of a law summarized below, on which no vote was taken by the Senate or the House of
Representatives on or before May 3, 2016?
SUMMARY
This proposed law would prohibit any farm owner or operator from knowingly confining any breeding pig, calf raised for
veal, or egg-laying hen in a way that prevents the animal from lying down, standing up, fully extending its limbs, or
turning around freely. The proposed law would also prohibit any business owner or operator in Massachusetts from
selling whole eggs intended for human consumption or any uncooked cut of veal or pork if the business owner or
operator knows or should know that the hen, breeding pig, or veal calf that produced these products was confined in a
manner prohibited by the proposed law. The proposed law would exempt sales of food products that combine veal or
pork with other products, including soups, sandwiches, pizzas, hotdogs, or similar processed or prepared food items.
The proposed law’s confinement prohibitions would not apply during transportation; state and county fair exhibitions; 4-
H programs; slaughter in compliance with applicable laws and regulations; medical research; veterinary exams,
testing, treatment and operation if performed under the direct supervision of a licensed veterinarian; five days prior to a
pregnant pig’s date of giving birth; any day that pig is nursing piglets; and for temporary periods for animal husbandry
purposes not to exceed six hours in any twenty-four hour period.
The proposed law would create a civil penalty of up to $1,000 for each violation and would give the Attorney General
the exclusive authority to enforce the law, and to issue regulations to implement it. As a defense to enforcement
proceedings, the proposed law would allow a business owner or operator to rely in good faith upon a written
certification or guarantee of compliance by a supplier.
The proposed law would be in addition to any other animal welfare laws and would not prohibit stricter local laws.
The proposed law would take effect on January 1, 2022. The proposed law states that if any of its parts were declared
invalid, the other parts would stay in effect.
A YES VOTE would prohibit any confinement of pigs, calves, and hens that prevents them from lying down,
standing up, fully extending their limbs, or turning around freely.
A NO VOTE would make no change in current laws relative to the keeping of farm animals.
QUESTION 4; LAW PROPOSED BY INITIATIVE PETITION
Do you approve of a law summarized below, on which no vote was taken by the Senate or the House of
Representatives on or before May 3, 2016?
SUMMARY
The proposed law would permit the possession, use, distribution, and cultivation of marijuana in limited amounts by
persons age 21 and older and would remove criminal penalties for such activities. It would provide for the regulation of
commerce in marijuana, marijuana accessories, and marijuana products and for the taxation of proceeds from sales of
these items.
The proposed law would authorize persons at least 21 years old to possess up to one ounce of marijuana outside of
their residences; possess up to ten ounces of marijuana inside their residences; grow up to six marijuana plants in their
residences; give one ounce or less of marijuana to a person at least 21 years old without payment; possess, produce
or transfer hemp; or make or transfer items related to marijuana use, storage cultivation, or processing.
10
OCTOBER 13, 2016
The measure would create a Cannabis Control Commission of three members appointed by the state Treasurer which
would generally administer the law governing marijuana use and distribution, promulgate regulations, and be
responsible for licensing of marijuana commercial establishments. The proposed law would also create a Cannabis
Advisory Board of fifteen members appointed by the Governor. The Cannabis Control Commission would adopt
regulations governing licensing qualifications; security; record keeping; health and safety standards; packaging and
labeling; testing; advertising and displays; required inspections; and such other matters as the Commission considers
appropriate. The records of the Commission would be public records.
The proposed law would authorize cities and towns to adopt reasonable restrictions on the time, place, and manner of
operating marijuana businesses and to limit the number of marijuana establishments in their communities. A city or
town could hold a local vote to determine whether to permit the selling of marijuana and marijuana products for
consumption on the premises at commercial establishments.
The proceeds of retail sales of marijuana and marijuana products would be subject to the state sales tax and an
additional excise tax of 3.75%. A city or town could impose a separate tax of up to 2%. Revenue received from the
additional state excise tax or from license application fees and civil penalties for violations of this law would be
deposited in a Marijuana Regulation Fund and would be used subject to appropriation for administration of the
proposal law.
Marijuana-related activities authorized under this proposed law could not be a basis for adverse orders in child welfare
cases absent clear and convincing evidence that such activities had created an unreasonable danger to the safety of a
minor child.
The proposed law would not affect existing law regarding medical marijuana treatment centers or the operation of
motor vehicles while under the influence. It would permit property owners to prohibit the use, sale, or production of
marijuana on their premises (with an exemption that landlords cannot prohibit consumption by tenants of marijuana by
means other than by smoking); and would permit employers to prohibit the consumption of marijuana by employees in
the workplace. State and local governments could continue to restrict uses in public buildings or at or near schools.
Supplying marijuana to person under age 21 would be unlawful.
The proposed law would take effect on December 15, 2016
A YES VOTE would allow persons 21 and older to possess, use and transfer marijuana and products containing
marijuana concentrate (including edible products) and to cultivate marijuana, all in limited amounts, and would provide
for the regulation and taxation of commercial sale of marijuana and marijuana products.
A NO VOTE would make no change in current laws relative to marijuana.
Hereof fail not and make return of this warrant with your doings thereon at the time and place of said voting.
th
Given under our hands this 13 day of October, 2016
#573 – REQUEST FOR EXTENDED HOURS OF OPERATION FOR TARGET
A hearing was ordered for October 27, 2016, on the petition from Target, located at 227
Highland Ave., to request a one-day extension of store hours on Friday, November 25, 2016, the
day after Thanksgiving, to open sometime after 12:000 AM for this day only. Target normally
opens on Fridays at 8:00 A.M.
Councillor Furey recused himself and left the Council Chamber.
11
OCTOBER 13, 2016
#574 – REQUEST FROM PEM TO OBSTRUCT A PUBLIC WAY
A request from the Peabody Essex Museum to obstruct a portion of a public way on Essex
Street commencing November 14, 2016 through December of 2018 to establish a safe, secure
staging area from which to execute the work of constructing a 38,000 square foot expansion, was
granted.
Councillor Furey returned to the Chamber
#575 – BLOCK PARTY
A request from the residents of Larchmont Rd. (from Beachmont Rd. to Claremont Rd.) to
hold a block party on Saturday, October 15 2016 from 12:00 P.M. to 4:00 P.M., was granted.
#576 - #577 - #578 LICENSE APPLICATIONS
The following license applications were granted,
PUBLIC GUIDES: Kathleen Heywood, 126 Railroad Ave., Salisbury
Rebecca Ferrari, 8 Barton Sq., Salem
TAXI CABS: Witch City Taxi, 32B Palmer St., Salem (5 Cars)
TAXI OPERATORS: Ramon Guzman, 20 Elm St., Lynn
Johanny Polonco-Castillo, 12 Pope St., Salem
Rosanyilis Fabian, 52 Ward St., Salem
Antonio Valerio, 25 Sheridan St., Lawrence
#579 – TAG DAY
The following license application was referred to the Committee on Ordinances, Licenses
and Legal Affairs.
TAG DAY: S.H.S. Gymnastics, 1/29/17 and 2/12/17
12
OCTOBER 13, 2016
#560 - #585 CLAIMS
The following Claims were referred to the Committee on Ordinances, Licenses and Legal
Affairs.
Diane Rose, 21 Elmwood Circle, Peabody
Scott Traicoff, 18 Wentworth Dr., Beverly
Julie Shea, 45 Dearborn St., Salem
Phillip Duane, 7 Ward St., Salem
Jeffrey Partaledis, 86 Derby St., Salem
Philson Limited Partnership, 63 Grove St., Salem
(#482) – SECOND PASSAGE ORDINANCE AMENDING OFFENSES & MISCELLANEOUS
PROVISIONS
The matter of second passage of an Ordinance amending Ch. 24 – Offenses &
Miscellaneous Provisions by adding Sec. 24-29 Proctor’s Ledge, was then taken up. It was
adopted for second and final passage.
(#485) – SECOND PASSAGE ORDINANCE AMENDING TRAFFIC RESIDENT STICKER
PARKING PRESTON ROAD
The matter of second passage of an Ordinance amending Traffic Ch. 42, Sec. 75 Resident
Sticker Parking Preston Road, was then taken up. It was adopted for second and final passage.
(#486) – SECOND PASSAGE ORDINANCE AMENDING TRAFFIC TOW ZONE RAYMOND
AVENUE
The matter of second passage of an Ordinance amending Traffic Ch. 42, Sec. 74 Towing
Zone Raymond Avenue, was then taken up. It was adopted for second and final passage.
(#488) – SECOND PASSAGE ORDINANCE AMENDING TRAFFIC HANDICAP PARKING
REPEAL DEARBORN STREET
The matter of second passage of an Ordinance amending Traffic Ch. 42, Sec. 50B
Handicap Parking Repeal Dearborn Street, was then taken up. It was adopted for second and final
passage.
13
OCTOBER 13, 2016
(#489) – SECOND PASSAGE ORDINANCE AMENDING TRAFFIC HANDICAP PARKING
UPHAM STREET
The matter of second passage of an Ordinance amending Traffic Ch. 42, Sec. 50B
Handicap Parking Upham Street, was then taken up. It was adopted for second and final passage.
(#491) – SECOND PASSAGE ORDINANCE AMENDING TRAFFIC STOP SIGN WILLSON
ROAD
The matter of second passage of an Ordinance amending Traffic Ch. 42, Sec. 49
Obedience to Isolated Stop Sign Willson Road, was then taken up. It was adopted for second and
final passage.
(#492) – SECOND PASSAGE ORDINANCE AMENDING TRAFFIC HANDICAP PARKING
ALLEN STREET
The matter of second passage of an Ordinance amending Traffic Ch. 42, Sec. 50B
Handicap Parking Allen Street, was then taken up. It was adopted for second and final passage.
(#540) – SECOND PASSAGE ORDINANCE AMENDING TRAFFIC RESIDENT STICKER
PARKING FAIRVIEW AVENUE
The matter of second passage of an Ordinance amending Traffic Ch. 42, Sec. 75 Resident
Sticker Parking Fairview Avenue, was then taken up. It was adopted for second and final passage.
(#541) – SECOND PASSAGE ORDINANCE AMENDING TRAFFIC PARKING PROHIBITED
REPEAL FAIRVIEW AVENUE
The matter of second passage of an Ordinance amending Traffic Ch. 42, Sec. 51 Parking
Prohibited Repeal Fairview Avenue, was then taken up. It was adopted for second and final
passage.
(#542) – SECOND PASSAGE ORDINANCE AMENDING TRAFFIC HANDICAP PARKING
BECKETT STREET
The matter of second passage of an Ordinance amending Traffic Ch. 42, Sec. 50B
Handicap Parking Beckett Street, was then taken up. It was adopted for second and final passage.
14
OCTOBER 13, 2016
(#543) – SECOND PASSAGE ORDINANCE AMENDING TRAFFIC HANDICAP PARKING
REPEAL CONGRESS STREET
The matter of second passage of an Ordinance amending Traffic Ch. 42, Sec. 50B
Handicap Parking Repeal Congress Street, was then taken up. It was adopted for second and final
passage.
(#545) – SECOND PASSAGE ORDINANCE AMENDING TRAFFIC BUS STOPS, HOLYOKE
SQUARE
The matter of second passage of an Ordinance amending Traffic Ch. 42, Sec. 11 Bus
Stops, Holyoke Square, was then taken up. It was adopted for second and final passage by roll call
vote of 6 yeas, 5 nays, 0 absent. Councillors Eppley, Famico, Furey, Gerard, McCarthy and Turiel
were recorded as voting in the affirmative. Councillors Dibble, Lovely, Milo, Ryan and Sargent were
recorded as voting in the negative. A motion for immediate reconsideration in the hopes it would
not prevail was denied.
(#546) – SECOND PASSAGE ORDINANCE AMENDING TRAFFIC PARKING TIME LIMITED
UNMETERED ZONES, LAFAYETTE STREET & OCEAN AVENUE
The matter of second passage of an Ordinance amending Traffic Ch. 42, Sec. 57A, Parking
Time Limited; Unmetered Zones, Lafayette Street and Ocean Avenue, was then taken up. It was
adopted for second and final passage.
On the motion of Councillor Furey the meeting adjourned at 8:50 P.M.
ATTEST: CHERYL A. LAPOINTE
CITY CLERK