Loading...
75 LORING AVENUE - BUILDING INSPECTION 75 WRING'AVENUE t . " Y So CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS BUILDING DEPARTMENT 120 WASHINGTON STREET,3'D FLOOR TEL: 978-745-9595 KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL FAX' 978-740-9846 MAYOR THOMAS ST.PIERRE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROPERTIES/BUILDING COMMISSIONER Building Code Violation 75 Loring Avenue October 9, 2013 t John Toy Rosemary Toy 508 North State Street Concord, New Hampshire 03301 Mr. &Ms. Toy i The ensuing communication shall serve as our follow-up to our telephone call regarding the unpermitted work at 75 Loring Avenue. Complaints were received by our Department the aforementioned property and 'upon inspection the property was found to be in violation of the Massachusetts State Building Code. t I- Un permitted electrical and construction work. (Section 105.0 of 780 CMR Massachusetts State Building Code) —!Building Permit Application Form,Permit Fee, Debris Disposal Affidavit, Worker's Compensation Affidavit and Stamped Drawings from a Registered Massachusetts Architect(with review from Salem Prevention prior to submittal to the Building Department) arerequired to be submitted during the filing. 2- Provide a signed and notarized affidavit from a Registered Massachusetts Architect stating the work completed is in compliance with the Massachusetts State Building Code. With standing this letter de-construction of the partition wall shall be required to review code compliance. 3- Electrical permit shall be applied for by a licensed Massachusetts Electrician, with disclosure to such department that work has been previously completed. Until such time that all requirements of this letter and any and all further requirements are complete: CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS ' BUILDING DEPARTMENT 120 WASHINGTON STREET 3RD FLOOR TEL: 978-745-9595 KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL FAx: 978-740-9846 MAYOR THOMAS ST.PIERRE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROPERTIES/BUILDING COMMISSIONER You are hereby ordered to begin to rectify these conditions immediately upon of receipt of this notice. Failure to do so may result in Municipal tickets and further actions being brought against you, up to and including the filing of criminal complaints at District Court. You have the right to appeal this order to the State Board of Building Regulations at One Ashburton Place, Boston, Ma. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact the Building Inspectors Office at (978) 745-9595, extension 5648. Respectfully,xxl� Michael E. Lutrzykowski Assistant Building Inspector Cc: file, of alrm, C�ussar4usrfts Paurb of �ppcnl DECISION-ON-THE-PETITION OF JOHN TOY FOR A VARAINCE AT [75 LORING AVE. (R�2) FIL90 A hearing on this petition was held February 17, 1988 with the lfo�o ingbBoa'rd��� Members present: James Hacker, Chairman; Messrs. , Fleming, Strout and Associate Member Dore. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner, owner of the property,is requesting a Variance from use and parking to allow premises to be used for classes on Tai Chi Chaun. Property is located in an R-2 district. The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board that: a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district; b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner; c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Apeai, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . Although located in an 5-2 district, the property is adjacent to an industrial facility and across from several commercial establishments; 2. ehic_es entering and exiting from the property could exacerbate existing traffic problems and endanger criidren in the area; 3. Traffic & parking problems would be minimized by limited class size; 4. Ward Councillor Mark Blair spoke in opposition to the petition citing potential traffic problems. There was no other opposition; 5. On person spoke in favor of the petition. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district generally; 2. Literal enforcement of the Ordinance would work a substantial hardship on the petitioner; } DEGISIOh: CN THE PET_.101d OF OH1; ?OR A. VARIANCE FOR LCRING AcENUZ, SALEM page two v. The relief requested can be granted Without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0, to grant the relief requested, subject to the following terms and conditions: 1 . Petitioner will use the first floor only for one on one teaching; 2. The Fire Department's requirements for mixed use ( residential/commercial) fire alarm systems must be met; 3. A traffic warning sign must be placed at the driveway exit; 4 . Hours of operation are 9:00 a.m.-9:00 p.m. , Monday through Saturday; 5. At least four parking spaces constructed in accordance with the Salem Zoning Ordinance must be maintained. GRANTED Peter Dore, Associate Member, Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK APPER RV:,: THIS P'_,.._.. !.'!T T7 cr rT!^'i !7 i i -u1 Gi3%4- 4.¢._t_ C'c - b,.'.a C; iAIN] OF TFE� CpRAFTr. 'i:iic::: DDFr. BOARD OF A;PEM Citp of &a(CM, 0a9!5dCbU.5CttMIJILDMG DEPT Office of the Citp Council �q citp joait Mar 30 8 10 A" 15 �Qry�Ng W VINCENT J. FURFARO RECEINEd"ARD COUNCILLORS COUNCILLORS-AT-LARGE PRESIDENT CITY OF SALEM,HAS$989 1989 GEORGEA.NOWAK DONALD T.BATES JOSEPHINE R. FUSCO KEVIN R.HARVEY CITY CLERK VINCENT J.FURFARO FRANCES J.GRACE NEIL J.HARRINGTON LEONARD F.O'LEARY JEAN-GUY J.MARTINEAU GEORGE P.McCABE SARAH M.HAYES MARK E.BLAIR May 25 , 1989 Mr. William H. Munroe Building Inspector City of Salem Salem, MA 01970 Dear Bill: Residents of Ward Seven have brought to my attention a two-family home with a large business sign attached to it. The property is located at 75 Loring Avenue. To my knowledge, there is no permit for this sign, and it is not allowable under the City of Salem' s current ordinance. I would appreciate your department taking the necessary steps in having this sign removed. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Very truly yours, �J MARK E. BLAIR COUNCILLOR WARD SEVEN MEB/deb Cite of *aYem, A1ag!5acbuattg public Aropertp Mepartment �3uilbing Mepartment One balem green PY (978) 745-9595 Cxt. 380 Peter Strout Director of Public Property Inspector of Buildings Zoning Enforcement Officer July 2, 2001 75 Loring Avenue Trust John Evangelista—Trustee 33 Milford Street Boston, Ma. 02118 RE: 75 Loring Avenue, Salem Dear Mr. Evangelista: Due to a complaint received by this department, I inspected the exterior of your above mentioned property. The fence is falling over onto your neighbors property. Also the rear steps need to be repaired or replaced. State Building Code 780 CMR Section 120 requires the owner of a property to maintain all systems in proper working order. Therefore, you are directed to secure a building permit for the rear stairs and to repair or replace the fence within 30 days upon receipt of this letter. Failure to comply will result in municipal code tickets being written and a complaint being filed in Salem District Court. If you have any question please contact this office. Sincerely, Thomas St. Pierre Local Building Inspector cc: Mayors Office Councillor O'Keefe