The URL can be used to link to this page

60 WASHINGTON STREET 60 WASHINGTON STREET , li Salem Redevelopment Authority Decision April 11, 2012 60 Washington Street (3 Potato 4): Discussion and vote on proposed signage and carry out window SRA Decision At their meeting on April 11, 2012, the SRA voted to approve the March 28, 2012, DRB recommendation for the proposed signage and carry out window at 60 Washington Street. DRB Recommendation At its meeting on March 28, 2012, the DRB recommended approval of the proposed signage and carry out window for 3 Potato 4 with the following conditions: • If the decision of the building inspector regarding the window height impacts the fagade, the applicant will need to return for review and approval of those changes; • The clearance height of exterior sign needs to be at least 8'; • The bracket specifications shall be provided; and • The interior sign shall be hung. Staff Comment for April 11 SRA Meeting The applicant provided the bracket specifications. Due to a gap in communication, the applicant's contractor completed the installation of the window and hung the sign. Photos are included in the packet. Proposal for March 28 DRB and April 11 SRA Meeting The submission, dated March 15, 2012, includes the window plan, photos and signage drawings. The proposal is for two signs: 2' x 2' blade sign fabricated on PVC and a 1' x 2' window sign. The blade sign will hang from a new sign bracket and will not be lighted. The window sign will obscure less than 20 percent of the window. Both signs are vinyl. A sliding glass carryout window will be added. Staff Comment for March 28 DRB Meeting The signage complies with City and SRA guidelines. Please note the photoshop images are not to scale. r Salern Redevelopment .Authoritv Salem Redevelopment Authority Decision September 10, 2008 60 Washington Street: Proposed changes to two entrances SRA Decision At their meeting on September 10, 2008, the SRA voted to approve the August 20, 2008 DRB recommendation for the proposed changes to two entrances at 60 Washington Street with the condition that the railings be painted to match the trim. DRB Recommendation At their meeting on August 20, 2008, the DRB voted to recommend approval of the proposed changes to the two entrances at 60 Washington Street with the condition that the railings be painted to match the trim. Proposal The proposal is to lower the exist ng door to the main entrance by approximately six inches and rebuild the entrance ramp. In addition, the ramped entrance to the current Courthouse Deli would be replaced with two steps. Since the DRB reviewed the proposal on July 23, the applicant has confirmed the railing for the building lobby door will not extend beyond the property line. r r salelll Redevelopment Authority Design Review Board Recommendation August 20, 2008 60 Washington Street: Discussion of proposed changes to two entrances DRB Recommendation At their meeting on August 20, 2008, the DRB voted to recommend approval of the proposed changes to the two entrances at 60 Washington Street with the condition that the railings be painted to match the trim. Proposal The proposal is to lower the existing door to the main entrance by approximately six inches and rebuild the entrance ramp. In addition, the ramped entrance to the current Courthouse Deli would be replaced with two steps. Since the DRB reviewed the proposal on July 23, the applicant has confirmed the railing for the building lobby door will not extend beyond the property line. Harbor Place 7 Rantoul Street GOLDBERG Suite 100B • Beverly, MA 01915-4822 September 2, 2008 To: Tom Daniel Salem Redevelopment Authority Salem, Massachusetts, 01974 From: William H. Goldberg, Trustee 60 Washington Street Realty Trust 7 Rantoul Street Beverly MA 01915 Re: Recap for the hand rail installation 60 Washington Street Salem, MA 01970 Dear Tom: Per your request, let this letter serve as a recap for the SRA with respect to our request to make the entry way for 60 Washington Street handicap accessible. Currently the elevation differential between the City sidewalk and the interior of our property is roughly 12 inches. Our building sits exactly on the property line. In pursuing the concept of making our building more handicap accessible, the Building Inspector's office recommended we raise the side walk in front of our property. Architectural plans based upon this concept were created. The end result was neither the DRB or us liked the results. After considerable additional discussions of varying concepts, we finalized an alternative approach which was recently approved by the DRB. This approach involves the following steps: Tel. (978) 922-0800 • Fax: (978) 922-0833 Page 2 of 2: September 2, 2008 1. Removing the existing six foot ten inch exterior ramp accessing the lobby of 60 Washington Street and replacing it with a new cement ramp with a grade of 1:12. 2. Lower the existing entryway doorway system to accommodate this new ramp system. 3. Install to code and as agreed with the DRB a handicap rail system on the south side of the exterior foyer and as practical on the north side. 4. Paint this rail system green (Benjamin Moore paint) to match the existing green accent color. 5. Redo the interior lobby to create a new 1:20 ramp system to accommodate the remaining 6+/- inch floor differential between the sidewalk and the flooring within our property. 6. Remove the steep existing ramp entryway into the retail space formerly occupied by the Court House Deli and replace it with two steps entry system. Install a door from the lobby into this same retail space to achieve handicap accessibility. The end results will enhance handicap access to our property. Yet in a manner that is minimally noticeable. Tom, I hope the above is sufficient for your needs. Sincer ly yours Wil/ iam H. Go]' erg Cu3�hu k� 53 �rilrc u4ia N6NFx ELI I ggo i MOIR u3 t� ® VV >Q 0 1 1 I i EXISTING BRICK EXISTING MASONRY ARCH. ENTRY AR PANELS A4 TRIM. EX15TI NG BRICK. NEW HAND RAILS - NEW HC RAMP 3G" HT. 20" HT. t> - AT BUILDING ENTRY. NEW RAMP ELEV. 1 l '-6 EX. WALK ELEV, I '_ I EXISTING FOUNDATION EXISTING CONCRETE WALK AND BASEMENT. TO REMAIN. \T BUILDING ENTRY. NffW RAMP . Z9 'd d40£ 488 846 T alU839Z1Id f f Wd 8S: T0 80-b0-Dno EXISTING EX15TING BRICK ENTRY A MA50NRY ARCH, PANELS A J TRIM. EX15 I G EXISTING ENTR, REA, BRICK. OR WALKWAY. NEW HAND RAIL5 )LOPE 1 :20 3G" HT. 20" HT. NEW HC RAMP AT BUILDING ENTRY. NEW RAMP --_- - _ -� _-- ELEV. I I '-G" EX, WALK ELEV. I I I EY15TING FOUNDATION EX15TING C' AND DA5EMENT. TO REMAIN 5ECTION DF EXI5TING 51 £0 'd 4402 L88 846 1 UIV83DZlId f f Wd 6S: i0 80-40-onv nim oz r� O' As AIZ , Aiz <IG S S S n n n n m sherwood green z kittery point green 0 van alen green 0 To achieve these colors,a deep base primer and multiple top coati are required. 0'm As color samples are affected by age,light,heat and mechanical coating,this sample may vary slightly in color or in finish 0 Z o from the actual paint.Colors may not be available in all Benjamin MoomA products and sizes.These mlors are mixed upon r- 0 request by an authorized Benjamin Moore"retailer. LL LL 0 D For the retailer nearest you, call 1 -800-6-DA Z N 3. benjaminmoore.mm � 8 M� m0 ° IIIIIIIIIIII IIIII �II VIII III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII �m sherwood green kittery point green van alen green i Salem Redevelopment Atithorit Design Review Board Proposal August 20, 2008 60 Washington Street: Discussion of proposed changes to two entrances Proposal The proposal is to lower the existing door to the main entrance by approximately six inches and rebuild the entrance ramp. In addition, the ramped entrance to the current Courthouse Deli would be replaced with two steps. Since the DRB reviewed the proposal on July 23, the applicant has confirmed the railing for the building lobby door will not extend beyond the property line. , Harbor Place RECEIVED 7 Rantoul Street AUG 0 5 2008 GOLDBERG Suite IOOB MIXMZ • Beverly, MA 01915-4822 DEPT.OF PLANNNVG& COMMMITY DEVELM ENT August 5,2008 Tom Daniel 120 Washington St., Std Floor Salem,MA 01970 RE: Railing system at 60 Washington St. Dear Tom: Attached please End seven copies of the proposed plans for the railing system at 60 Washington St. When you have a moment,please confirm timing for appointment for next Thursday. Finally, railings can be bronze coated as in front of city hall annex or painted green to match trim of 60 Washington St. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, William Goldberg Tel. (978) 922-0800 • Fax: (978) 922-0833 i I I EXISTING BRICK EXISTING MA50NKY ARCH. ENTRY AR PANELS A TRIM. EXISTING BRICK. NEW HAND RAILS NEW HC RAMP 3G" HT. 20" HT. s AT BUILDING ENTRY. NEW RAMP EX. WALK I=LEV. I ELEV. I I '— I " EXISTING FOUNDATION EXISTING CONCRETE WALK AND 5A5EMENT. TO REMAIN. rT BUILDING ENTRY. NEW RAMP . z9 'd 440E 488 846 i alwN39ZlId r r w8 85= I0 89-40-onu EXI5TING EyISTING DKICK ENTRY A - MASONRY ARCH, PANEL5 A TRIM. EXI5 I G EXI5TING ENT R REA, BRICK. OR WALKWAY. NEW HAND RAIL5 NEW HC RAMP SLOPE 1 :20 36" HT. 20" HT. AT DUILDING ENTRY. NEW RAMP -_- - _ - _ - _ ELEV. I I -(;" EX, WALK ELEV. I I ' III EXI5TING FOUNDATION CX15TING C' AND 13A5EMENT. TO REMAIN 5ECTION DE EX15T1 NG 51 7 1 � • I • Tl r \1 £0 'd 4402 488 046 S Q-ltlN J-Id f f Wd 69: 10 80-b0-8f1H • 521 CMR: ARCHITECTURAL.ACCESS BOARD , 1111 24.1 GENERAL Any part of an accessible route with a slept greater than 1:20(5%)shall be considered a ramp and shall comply with the requirements of 521 CMR 24. 24,2 SLOPE AND RISE Ramps shall have the least posaibL•slope. 24.2.1 The maximum slope of a ramp shall be 1:12(8.3%), measured between any two points on the romp. ('There is no tolerance allowed on elope) 24.2.2 The maximum rise for any run andt be 30 inches(30"-762rnm). See Fig,24a. 12 1 Urraee or asap Laval Horizontal Projection of Run Leval Landing Ramp slope Lending Figure 24e I Exceptions: A slope between I:IC(100/.)and 1:12(8.3%)is allowed for a single rise of a maximum thfee inches(3"-76mm). 24.3 CLEAR WIDTH The m'vdmum clear width of a ramp shall he 48 inches(48' - 1219mm), measured between the railings. See Fig.24b. t2t9 gYq�Yq — r Wall iA#- clear i r•;:::, _ .:.. 1219 .. ... l `• Ramp Width and Handtall Height 10Igure 241; 24.4 LANDINGS Ramp shall have landings for turning and resting. At a minimum, landings shall be located at the bottom and the top of each rams and each ramp run, and whenever a ramp changes direction. The maximum length of a ramp run between landings shall not exceed 30 feet(30'=9m). Landings shall have the following features: See Fig.24c. 2/23/96 521 CMR•93 v0 'd LL0£ L88 846 T CFIV?130ZlId f f Wd 6S: TO 80—v0—Dnu 521 CMR: ARCH1TECTIAl.AL ACCESS BOARD 2453 Helghu; Handrails shell be provided in pair&,one at a height between 34 Inches inti 31 inches (34--31'-164mm-965.).and a lower one Ni a height between la and 20 inches(19'-20' 457mm-509mm),measured vertically from the surface of the romp to top of handrail. 24.5.3 Continuous aurfaa: Handrei6'hae be continuous without interruption,except by doorways and openings,w that a hand can move 6om end to end without interruption. 24-5.4 Fxtwiou: Handrails shall extend at lean 12 inches(12'-305mm)beyond the top and bottom of me rmnp and shag be parallel with the floor or ground arAa(ass Fig.24d),except where the W_.an would cause a safery hazard r tln - In fig so 521 CMR ARCHITECTURAL ACCESS BOARD man Nora: a.1 elgwss fie find as. I Level lantling �M1 ao' ton 7111 NOTL and Rgures ue find IM esr Near Id fig' mu L ff 1111 0, 'f- Maneuvering Cleanness as peen landma s:s:::::,•;y:r;.;•.,,... `:.i��•r�,..y2,,sc:: �illl',E fie•man ad' 1 t/a1 a.t e• �f" MIMMUm landing ala M Change el Olnnlln Rpm IN 24.4.1 General: Landings shall be leve!and unobstructed by projections and door wing', except as pamicted by 321 CMR 24:4.6. 24.4.2 Width: The landing"be a lean u wide u the rmnp M leading to it. 24.4.3 length: The landing length ahfig be a minimum of 60 inches(60'-1524mm)dem. 24.4.3 Dimentiou for fuming:H recaps change direction a landings,the minimum landing An shell be 60 incMs by 601ncless(60'by 60'-1324min by 1524mm). See Fig.24c. 24.4.6 Doorways u Landings: If a doorway it located At a Wading,than the heel as in&Om of the doorway Iha9 also comply with awwvsring cleannw in Fig.26d and 26e. 24.5 HAHDRAUS Handrails shag be provided a fig rompr. Handrad'shall have the felowing features: 24.5.1 Location; Handralll shag be provided along both sides of rmmp segments. ( 7127/0 521 C]vfll•94 98-6 LL8£ 288 826 T alwisBuz1Id f f wa 6S: t8 88-bO-onv Kom Harbor Place 7 Rantoul Street GOLDBERG Suite 100B Beverly, MA 01915-4822 August 7, 2008 To: Tom Daniel Salem Redevelopment Authority Salem, Massachusetts, 01970 From: William H. Goldberg, Trustee 60 Washington Street Realty Trust 7 Rantoul Street Beverly MA 01915 Re: Hand rail installation 60 Washington Street Salem, MA 01970 Dear Tom: Per your request, I am hopeful the following will answer the DRB's latest questions: 1. Diameter of the handicap rail? The handicap rail will be one and one-half inches. 2. Length of railing? The railing will be six feet six inches. It will not protrude out into the sidewalk. 3. Material hand rail will be made out of? The handrail and brackets will be made of steel pipe with rounded edges. We recommend this railing system (including brackets) be painted green to match the trim colors of the property to minimize its visibility. We urge brass plated railings be avoided by the fact, as in front of the city hall annex, after several years this system becomes pitted with underlying black coming forth creating an ugly site. 4. Brackets will be made of steel, painted green and will mimic the simple design as shown on the attach Architectural Access Board, 521 CMR Tel. (978) 922-0800 • Fax: (978) 922-0833 Page 2 of 2: August 7, 2008 page 95 example. As with the railing itself, it is our hope the DRB will agree, it is preferable to minimize the visibility of the four brackets. Please confirm ASAP timing of meeting for next Thursday so we can finally obtain determination from the DRB whether we can or cannot perform upgrades for a portion of 60 Washington Street, Salem. Tom, your help is needed to finalize this process. Because of the elongated nature of this process, the time frame for renovations and the current date, we're at the breaking point, regardless of the DRB's ultimate answer whether we make this additional investment in 60 Washington Street, Salem. Sincerely yours, L. William H. Gold rg 521 CMR: ARCHrMCTURAL,ACCESS BOARA 24.5.2 Heights: Handrails shall be provided in pale, one at a height between 34 inches W 38 inches (34•-38' - 164mm. 965mm), and a lower one u a height between 18 and 20 inchm(180-20• - 457nm508mm),mwured verdeally torn the surhoe of the ramp to top ofhandrail. 24,5.3 Continuous surface: FLndrails shall be continuous without Interruption, except by doorways and openings, so that a hand can move from end to end without interruption. 24.3.4 Extension. Handrails shall extend at least 12 inches(12'-303mm)beyond the top and bottom of the ranp and shall be parallel with the (loor or ground surface (see Fig. 24d), except where the extension would cause a ssftty hazard. In 2' In 2D ]D w, Levil UI Ural ndlnpI Lanelne NandrUl expntlena Ft0ur4 140 24.5.5 Si24:The handgrip portion of the handrail shall not be less than I''A inches(l'/.'—32mm)not more than 11h inches(1'/r' -38mm)in outside diameter. 24.5.6 Shape: The handgrip portion❑f the handrail &hail be found or oval in cross-section. See Fit, 244. 24.5.7 Surface: The gripping surface shall be free of arty sharp or abrasive elements. 24 3.1 Clearance: Whan a har"is mounted adjacent tog waq the clan sp❑ce between the hands$l and the wall shall be 1'h inches(1'h"-78mm). Handrails may be located in a wap recess if the recess u+twanamt of three inches(3"-76mm)deep and extends at least 18 inches(I8'-457mm)above the top of the rail. See Fig.Zee. 1.114 1.114• la 1.11, i' j" 1.11]• 1!9' � 1•l l]' T �7 "'A 1.114` to 1.112' 1.1/ i Mandralls ]• max Fleur$ 244 78 1`2]/96 521 CMR-95 Z0 'd L20£ L88 8L6 i Q1Ed NEIDZ1Id f f Wd 6Zt £0 80-90-nnij Nri ( :4 24.5.5 Sia;The handgrip portion of the handrail Shall net be less that 1 Y,inches(l'A-32mm)nor more than 1'h inches(I W-38mm)in outside diameter. 'i 24.5.6 Shape: The handgrip portion of the handrail shall be round or oval in cross-section. See Fit.24e. 24.5.7 Surface: The gripping surtbce shell be free of any sharp or abrasive element. 24.5.8 Clearance; When it handrail is mounted adjacent to a well,the clew jPace between the handrail and the wall shall be 1'%inches(I'S'-38mm) Handrails may be located in a wall recon if the recess is a rtwdmum of three inches(3'-76mm)deep and extends at least 18 inches(18'-457mm)above the top of the reit. See Fig.24e_ 1-1/4 1.1/4' to to 7 1.111' la 1.11a'� t•1l Handnlb e• ma: �Ipun a/4 7 d 2/'53/96 521 CMR 95 z0 'd LL0£ Lee 8L6 T Qlee Pj3`)Zl Id f f Wd 6Z: £0 80-90—onu r , a �,IS Design Review Board Proposal June 25, 2008 60 Washington Street: Discussion of proposed sidewalk elevation change Proposal The proposal is to change the sidewalk elevation to make the retail tenant spaces more compliant with handicap accessibility codes. The proposal shows a sidewalk with two elevations. Nearest the building is a 7' wide sidewalk at a new elevation approximately 1'-3" higher than the existing sidewalk. There would be a 3' high fence separating the new sidewalk from the existing one. Approximately 2'-4" of the existing sidewalk remain with the meters as they exist today. Goldberg Properties is exploring an alternative design with Dunkin' Donuts utilizing the common entrance door on the right end of the building. Harbor Place 7 Rantoul Street GOLDBERG suite loa • Beverly, MA 01915-4822 June 17,2008 Salem Design Review Board 120 Washington St.,3rd Floor Salem,MA 01970 RE: Handicap Accessibility for 60 Washington St. Dear Sir or Madam: This letter is to request being placed on the agenda for the Design Review Board's Meeting on June 251h. The purpose of out application is to discuss the design for a new sidewalk in front the building located at 60 Washington St. The reason for the new sidewalk is Dunkin Donuts would like to move into one of the retail spaces and their corporate office is requiring all Dunking Donut locations have Handicap Accessibility that meets today's codes. Sincerely,,,, _ Andrew Goldberg Tel. (978) 922-0800 • Fax: (978) 922-0833 �, M�M�r ILLIS� OIIIFI[II �Si,� � � v R r 1 P t V - i. m l4 60Washington Street �3 i yy�M, x_- _ • tet} v L I�, rR' 60 Washington Storefronts f _ A 60 c i , Washington Storefronts Design Review Board Proposal July 23, 2008 60 Washington Street: Discussion of proposed changes to two entrances Proposal The proposal is to lower the existing door to the main entrance by approximately six inches and rebuild the entrance ramp. In addition, the ramped entrance to the current Courthouse Deli would be replaced with two steps. 9kN6, Harbor Place W7 Rantoul Street GOLDBERG Suite 100B Beverly, MA 01915-4822 July 17, 2008 Salem Design Review Board 120 Washington St., 3ra Floor Salem, MA 01970 RE: Handicap Accessibility for 60 Washington St. Dear Sir or Madam: This letter is to request being placed on the agenda for the Design Review Board's Meeting on July 23rd. The purpose of our application is to discuss a new design to obtain handicap accessibility into one of the store fronts located at 60 Washington St. The new plan would entail lowering the existing door to the main entrance of the building approximately five (5) to seven (7) inches and the outside ramp to the main entrance of the building being redone. Also, the entrance to the store front on the tight hand side of the building that currently has Court House Deli as a tenant will have two steps going into the space from the sidewalk. Sincezely,, /�� Andrew Goldberg Tel. (978) 922-0800 Fax: (978) 922-0833 JT' z° C0 A i STAIRS DOWN EXISTING TOILET O ROOMS F EXISTING STAIRS EXISTING KITCHEN UP ELEVATOR 014pay � O o � e-- zW OF- t_ N (n n J w N0 10 a C° = o � a W0 z � _ w � o Ow Q wzQ � o � J W Wm W EXISTING U Q tu SEATING EXISTING c Q zwa E a E Z m Lu Q EXISTING LEASE AREA 4 z o E E E w PROPOSED N p - U Al2'-0" z - m E o E � - zo ° o E w a/ 0OZ U) z o N O N — E u CD Z W s m c � wLug N o U w0 � O - o z n u Ln Q b 8 8 EXISTING N o N a GUARDRAIL EXISTING C9 1D � �_ � `� - JJ SEATING PROPOSED > EX15TING LEASE AREA. EXISTING LEASE AREA. 4 1 1 '-G" cnQ Ow O NO NEW WORK. NO NEW WORK. w � O � Op - EXISTING U N U O 11 TRANSFORMERS 1 2'-0" 12-011' 1 2'- 13Y4 1 O U - o a oC w % 12.00 12.00 12. 15 I 00 = www = Qz F bQ A W � � U � CL z N = a 0 EXISTING LOW CONCRETE WALL EXISTING �10'-9-/2' 1 1 '-3%411 EX'I5TING GRANITE CURBS TWO NEW G" STEPS I I - 1 -Yz NEW ENTRY RAMP EX15TING DRIVEWAY O.G7 10.79 I 1 .27 EXISTING GRANITE CURBS AND CONCRETE WALK TO REMAIN. AT EXISTING DOOR WAY. 1 1 . 125 TO REPLACE EXISTIING, SLOPE: AND CONCRETE WALK TO REMAIN. REMOVE EXISTING RAMP. 10" O N U 1 1 .00 10. 1 25 10.04 = II// o �- Nx wO m 1 1 '-0" 10'- I %z" 10'-O Yz' 0 EXI5TING � 11 '-0— 4° Z W N 4 �-8-3/4" 3 n UI SIGN POLE EXISTING EXI5TING 10 8—Y4 EXI5TING _ PARKING METER 1 1 .02 LIGHT POLE 10.73 PARKING METER 10'-4�1 tj m 10.37 GRANITE CURB I STATION GRANITE CURB CURB CUT 3 N EXISTING POINT 10.00 EXISTING EXISTING p < o I 0 1 EX15TING EXISTING NG SPACES /I\� 1 PARKING SPACES 3 � / N PRELIMINARY FLOOR PLAN d z EXISTING BUILDING d SITE PLAN E o __j � LLJ g = < N a A uJ uJ 0 0 ro 0 PRELIMI/Wx FLOOR PLA/1 L / JIM PLA/1 I SCALE : 114" z CO c� z 0 n x 44,, Myr 8R 5+� /�5 s, mw x S` G % e� P 'e r 4 �W 4 ms�me g,�.wn y. �. m�°$ —a y.rn+u `� Q w' t }}�� f�l,�'j �` ##N�� ry�f b '�yg Rp v z,,.+ L w & fi.$ `'T.,: ! k' a # 5K!.rc`�" � `t L.� 3 i «: C Y , 4 v. 1 �: °z co � 1 � WA C� z W o 0w �I O Lo Lp �-� a- J w c � v C1�, ILL�JILJI lL=2jllL====Jll I Lil IL==i Lil Li IL===Jl 11L]i Lil I E D E E E z � c0 NEW HC ACCESS RAMP TO REPLACE o N EXISTING RAMP AT BUILDING ENTRANCE: W s REDUCED SLOPE 1 : 12 MAXIMIM. ui o u RAMP UP G", 0-0" RUN, MINIMUM. HC ACCESSIBLE HANDRAILS REQUIRED. AUTOMATIC DOOR OPENER REQUIRED. ° g g O N O N LL I N N O Q O EXISTING GRANITE CURBS TWO NEW G" STEPS EXISTING GRANITE CURB51 AND CONCRETE WALK TO REMAIN. AT EXISTING DOOR WAY. AND CONCRETE WALK TO REMAIN. A p O REMOVE EXISTING RAMP. EXISTING CONCRETE WALL BEYOND TO REMAIN. rRO/IT ELEVAT10/1 RAMP A/I [).fTr.P�f SCALE : 1 /4" - P-011 Ix 0 EXISTING GRANITE CURBS AND CONCRETE WALK TO REMAIN. EXISTING PARKING METERS, SIGNS, AND LIGHT POLE TO REMAIN. 3 REFER TO SITE PLAN DRAWING. O ov \ EXISTING EXISTING , N LEASE AREA. ENTRY. LLJ I HC ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE _ TO DUNKIN' DONUTS LEASE AREA AT BUILDING ENTRY VESTIBULE. �_- �� REFER TO SITE PLAN. NEW G" STEP5 / EXISTING FLOOR AT ENTRY. LLJ1 ELEV. 12-I13/4' cy 1 cy o IlWASHINGTON STREET: _ EX. CURB EXISTING PAVEMENT AND = J ELEV. 10 8-/4 < Z a GRANITE C:URB5 TO REMAIN. p Y F = 0 3 EX. PAVEMENT � a-J EXISTING FOUNDATION AND BASEMENT. EXISTING CONCRETE WALK ELEV. 10'-O" Ori < TO REMAIN. a L A uj a. o 9 SECTION DETAIL AT LEASE AREA ENTRY. N 0 EXISTING SIDEWALK / NEW STEPS. y °z co c� 17-1 -1 2 JLCTIO/l PETAL PROPOf Ll) CUREV A/V WALK/' � 1 SCALE . 112" = 1 '-011 A W -- - --- - - z 1�J c� Ing A STAIRS DOWN C7 J z "gym EXISTING = — TOI LETz O H z �p ROOMS EXISTING STAIRS EXISTING ,7� 0. KITCHEN UP ELEVATOR X23 `p Z) oLn � F 0- J W N 0 H a U m F O � ❑ O Q w J Lu J EXISTING z = SEATING LE w E ) EXISTING LEASE AREA 6 E o z " o E O o v o NEW ENTRY VESTIBULE. o u AT EXISTING EXITWAY. HC ACCESS TO LEASE AREA. SECURED ACCESS TO BUILDING _ N N ELEVATOR AND STAIRWAY.-, Z Z EXISTING SEATING 1 2.042 I r 1 F==41 It III E G� ENTRY DOORWAY, I O" EW RAMP UP 6" AT I : I 2 SLOPE. W w z 12'-0" 12'-0" EX. 'LOO I .00 O 12.00 12.00 12'- 13/q" b ACCESSIBLE HANDRAILS REQUIRED BOTH SIDES. A O AUTOMATIC DOOR OPENER REQUIRED FOR HC ACCESS. uJ C EXISTING EX. 1 1 '-3-/q" N I I '-8" 11 '-8" I,I '-6" ZZ EX. 10-8 I I -0 I I -6 1 2-0 0 \ EX. 1 1 1- 1 -1211 0 10-9-/2 6@ 1 : 1 2 6-O 6@ 1 :20 10-0 G@ 1 :20 10-0 LO 6 STEP AT T@ I : 12 7'-0" O II 4 DOOR WA 12" :20 20'- " 0 -0-1018 -0-101- 111 10'-G" I I �2' n I I %z" 4r t °� EX. 11 '-0" EX. 10- 1 % ' EX. 10.04 3 2 I I '- 10/z' NEW CURB 8" HT. I I '-7" NEW CURB 8" HT. J O 4r 2-Y4 EX. 11 ' 4; -0- " N I Zia' EX. 10'-83/4" EX. I O'-4-Y2' EXISTING CURB. EX. 10.00 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN D EXISTING FLOOR PLAN = EXISTING BUILDINGzz d CO cc a� o 0r V� � � t N E� _ z J ::D < �a Ex X E a A a uJ PRELIMI/ ARY JITS. PLA/1 D I SCALE : 1 /4" = 1 '-0" N 6 C5 z Lo • , z ' H a z ' A Z z � CO 03 o � z W � _ m OE (_ J W N 0 H O Lji i Lii LL=j iLL., L=ji _LL=jiiL==j LLi iL i [II Lil E � N 6 v 'u Z M o 0 E g Y cn w o Y I O � N E s N c tO' 41 n T 17 N M I 0 N 0 N L q7 HE 11 N N 0 0 � lu = 11 0 0 EXISTING CURBS WASHINGTON STREET: EXISTING CURBS NEW &' CURB AND WALK EXISTING CURB NEW CURB AND TO REMAIN. I I EXISTING PAVEMENT AND TO REMAIN. BEYOND. AND WALK ELEVATION. WALK ELEVATION. I W Z GRANITE CURBS TO REMAIN. E 0 20'-0' 7'-0" U] A � 0 L rRO/IT ELEVAT10/1 PRO POYLE) CU REV A/11) GUARD,,/' U_j SCALE : 114" = P-011 0 z 3 � J O 4r NEW GRANITE CURBS AND CONCRETE WALK, �O TO REPLACE EXISTING SIDEWALK. EXISTING PARKING METERS, SIGNS, m AND LIGHT POLE TO REMAIN IN n TRANSITION AREA BETWEEN CURBS. < N �� V C3 EXISTING EXISTING I p LEASE AREA. ENTRY. NEW CONCRETE WALK HC ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE Z N TO BE HC ACCEO SSIBLE. TO DUNKIN' DONUTS LEASE AREA REFER TO SITE PLAN. AT BUILDING ENTRY VESTIBULE. ° NEW G" STEP I REFER TO SITE PLAN. N EXISTING FLOOR AT ENTRY. I J V � ELEV. 12'- I -3/4" , NEW 8" CURB / WALK 0 ELEV. 1 1 '-7" WASHINGTON STREET: Q J EX. CURB EXISTING PAVEMENT AND J o '--------------- v14 ELEV. 10'-S' GRANITE CURBS TO REMAIN. < 3 — cQ CN 3 2'-4" EX. PAVEMENT L S O E EXISTING FOUNDATION ELEV. 10'-O" p = J AND BASEMENT. OIS ENREMO EDETE WALK p A X o uJ g co N SECTION DETAIL AT LEASE AREA ENTRY. i C) PROPOSED ACCE551BLE SIDEWALK. Y °z cq 0 c� g YECTI0/1 PETAIL PROP0f r-1) CURE. f A/V WALK,/' „ - 1 :JT �4 p ,Wp SCALE . 1 /2 — P-011 Q W el innirta � d� 1 "cam For "°090 �� *�Nb ¢� ,w� � pF � t-i 9 JT o z z ' A STAIRS Z r,L' DOWN J � z O (\ EXISTING = a Q Q co TOILET i ROOMS EXISTING STAIRS EXISTING r;� W o x KITCHEN UP ELEVATOR N O E W J w W NO Lu f— O F LL F-1 l� OO EXISTING 00 SEATING w W E N Q E E U E v p E EXISTING LEASE AREA z O o o LU U o N z E (n - N c6 4 W b 8 c 8 i N O N V Q Q EXISTING SEATING 12(-012.04 12.04 PIP o E" p O-Z O EX. FLOOR EX. FLOOR EX. FLOOR I '.00 1 2'-0" 121-011 E:11 2'- 1 3�4° a uJ EXISTING _ " EX. 101-91/211 EX. 11 '-3%4" DRIVEWAY EX. 10'-8 EX. I I '- I %z' I O.G7 10.79 8" @ 1 : 12 8'-0" G" @ 1 :20 10'-0" 4" @ 1 :20 0-8 OLn 10 @ 1 :20 2G'-8" G" @ 1 : 12 0-0" — '-G '-8I '-0 1 " 10'IOI I -2 12 12-0 -8" " „ 1O-2 2 1 -Y2 1 �2 _1 EX. I I '-O" Ex. 10'- I %z' LLJ EX. 10'-O Yz' <i NEW CURB 10" HT. NEW CURB 1211 HT. 121-011 NEW CURB 13" HT. 2-Y4 EX. I I '-0%a" N 12/a EX. 10-8_13 a' Q O EX. 10 4 Y2 EXISTING CURB. o '-0" 10.37 EX. 10 0 N N C9 6� PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN A = EXISTING FLOOR PLAN EXISTING BUILDING _ 0 CY C�jz _ � Y U = z LLJ a A d U PRELIMOARY YlTr. PL/1 A I 51CALE : 114" = 1 '-011 0 o Gq z z ' o � 0 JT t ' a �,.,o ' , (� 4tow — — — z � � WA o � cQ � nn O W o P� F O � J W No � lW O U a �I • 1, Li E Li L==JiiL==J Ll LlE Z a C E 0 Q y O N U) z o t'i N 5 4 C i E al N E (0 C) U 1� = cv m v NEW DET-BACK GRANITE CURBS, CONCRETE WALK, AND METAL GUARD TO REPLACE EXISTING SIDEWALK. o 0 8N o 8 NEW CONCRETE WALK N CD IS TO BE HC ACCESSIBLE. < z z REFER TO SITE PLAN. I� I WASHINGTON STREET: EXISTING CURBS NEW CURB AND WALK EXISTING WALK W O EXISTING PAVEMENT AND TO REMAIN. BEYOND. ELEVATION. F GRANITE CURBS TO REMAIN. U O 10-0' 32'-0' 16'-0' U] A '� 0 r u~J rRO/yT ELLVAT10/1 PROPOYE) CURPif A/yP GUARPY SCALE : 114" = 1 '-011 o 5 3 1LJ O J NEW GRANITE CURBS, CONCRETE WALK, AND METAL GUARD TO REPLACE EXISTING SIDEWALK. — EXISTING PARKING METERS, SIGNS, Dc m AND LIGHT POLE TO REMAIN INI TRANSITION AREA BETWEEN CURBS. V' /1 � EXISTING EXISTING 0� LEASE AREA. ENTRY. NEW CONCRETE WALK _ TO BE HC ACCESSIBLE. IREFER TO SITE PLAN. b J C� EXISTING FLOOR 7-O" "' tLJ NEW CURB / WALK ELEV. 12'- 13/a° I ELEV. 12'-0 _ -- WASHINGTON STREET: p J EX. CURB EXISTING PAVEMENT AND _J o \` �---------------- — ELEV. 10'-83/4' GRANITE CURBS TO REMAIN. 5Q CC) 2'-4, U 7,- : Z — d EXISTING FOUNDATION EX. PAVEMENT � J E AND BASEMENT. EXISTING CONCRETE WALK ELEV. 10I-0" 4r TO BE REMOVED. 0 SECTION DETAIL AT LEASE AREA ENTRY. g PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE 51DEWALK. o y z 1 YECTION PETAL PROPO.JE) CURbY A/V GUARPY z � SCALE . 112" I '-0" �T P r ed imil nary 1164.\loapo ` W Q STAIRS Z DOWN Z m 0 EXISTING = H z TOILET z ROOMS EXISTING STAIRS EXISTING O W KITCHEN UP ELEVATOR p F (n N J N �0- O F m m 0 az EXISTING O SEATING j w E N JE E Q E N E E EXISTING LEASE AREA y Lu o (n 5 E c zE� N W t N � V u W a 8 g 8 N O N \ Q Q EXISTING GUARDRAIL EXISTING SEATING 12'-0-%" 1 2,04 w o EXISTING I '-0" TRANSFORMERS A 0 12-011 12'-011 12'- 13/a" I .00 12.00 12.00 12. 15 b I EXISTING LOW aJ CONCRETE WALL Rl- EXISTING 0 10'-8° EXISTING DRIVEWAY = 10'-9-'/zlI I '-3�a1I I '- I % — 0.G7 10.79 1 1 .27 1 1 . 1 25 SLOPE: 1 011 < if N 3 � J to C9 -� O 4r LLi = 1 1 .00 10. 125 10.04 '0 o It 0 o m r I -o" 101- 1 All 101-o-YZ 1 o I 11-0-1411 z UJ N �r 10'-8-spa 1 m I 1 .02 10.73 6 10-4-4- o 10.37 GRANITE CURB CURB CUT N 10.00 EXISTING EXISTING N O 3 EXISTING FLOOR PLAN EXISTING BUILDING 0 EXISTING SITE PLAN o < 0 o Od O � ~ F T- V U = � Z w � LLJ � I a A uJ uJ I ay7i/iG FLOOR PLA/l / YlTr- PLA/l 0 SCALE : 114" = 1 '-011 0 N y c D Ld 'RBA s $R nnr� ae U w d rF gxm A_ 4 i�'�n,y e, g*. $ o