The URL can be used to link to this page

PICKERING WHARF SIGNS 1166 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge MasiachuseUs 02138 ADD Inc Architecture Design Development 617 661 0165 Philip M Briggs Wilson F Pollock Jr 22 October 1979 GENERAL NOTES RE: SIGNS AT PICKERING WHARF l.- There are a number of shops with various types of stickers applied to the shop windows. These stickers are in violation of t I he Tenant Design Criteria Manual (Section V-13) . These stickers may be applied. to hanging or free-standing mounts for display (see similar signs in "Mariner' s Cove" and "Young Reflections" shops, Building, M) . 2 . There continue to be many shop windows which are cluttered with temporary paper signs which should be removed as soon as possible. 3. No sandwich board signs have been approved by ADD Inc. The existing sandwich board signs tend to clutter the site and should be removed. 4 .- All installed buildi ng name signs�. were not built to ADD Inc design specifications and have not been approved by ADD Inc. 5. Please refer to the following for additional information regarding signs : 1) ADD Inc to Wilder-Manley letter of 18 July 1979 2) ADD Inc to Wilder-Manley letter of 9 October 1979 3) Project Sign Package Installed Signs and/or Their Locations Which Have Not Been Approved by ADD Inc or Which ADD Inc Has No Record of Approving :, Building A 1) "Brandy' s Restaurant" a) . Belt sign (approx. 21 x l ' ) on west elevation b) Bracket sign (approx. 3' x l ' ) on south elevation (S.E. corner of building) c) Hanging sign (approx. 3' x l ' ) between posts over south entrance to deck ADD Inc Architecture Design Development General Notes -2- 22 October 1979 Signs - Pickering Wharf Building B 1) "Shop at Papagallol, a) Belt sign (approx. 4 ' x 11 ) on east elevation b) Belt sign (approx. 4 ' x 11 ) on west elevation Building C 1) "Canniff ' s Men' s Shop" a) Belt sign (approx. I" x 8 ' ) on west elevation Approved by ADD Inc when located on. sign band--present location not approved by ADD Inc . "Paul Marks and Company" a) Bracket sign (approx. 31 x 31 ) on east elevation 3) Building name sign is missing. This sign should be located on the north elevation of the building (see "Project Signs" Package-B3c) . This sign apparently was removed when Canniff ' s Men ' s Shop awning was added. 4) Tower - Pickering Wharf .signs and the "Open" sign Building D 1) "Crabtree & Evelyn" a) Name painted on glass east and west elevations, ' 2) "Partridge Shop" a) Belt sign (approx. 1 ' x ll ' ) on east elevation 3) "Stoned Elephant" a) Belt sign (approx. l-AL ' x 101 ) on east eleva:tion approved by ADD Inc from a. photograph but as installed should be elevated slightly to fit within signage band. 4) "Lorraine Roy" a) Bracket sign (approx. 31 x 21 ) on southernmost corner of building Building E 1) "East Coast Outfitters" a) Name painted on glass b) Free-standing sign on wall to the south of the building ADD Inc Architecture Design Development , GENERAL NOTES -3- 22 October 1979 Signs - Pickering Wharf Building F 1) "Peter Barter Florist" a) Belt sign (approximately 121 x 11 ) over north entrance. b) Bracket sign on north elevation 2) "Country Curtains" a) Please use front entrance" sign (1811 x ,811) on rail of rear (East) door . b) "Store Hours. . . 11 sign (1811 x 811) on rail of main (West) door. 3) Large half round Pickering Wharf project sign on north elevation (Designed and approved by ADD Inc) 7 ADD Inc has not found any record of approving the. location of this sign. Building G 1) "The Galley" � a) Belt signs (Approximately 3-1/21 x 1-1/21 ) over south and west elevations . 2) "Argo Raw Bar" All signs 3) "Charlie Chengs of California" All signs 4) "Juice Plus" All signs 5) "Bavarian 'Strudel House" - All signs 6) "Pastry Odessey" - All signs 7) "Souvlaki" All . signs . 8) "Look Ma! " All signs 9) "Scolas" - All signs 10) Sandwich board on sidewalk to south of building (Approximately 3 'x 3-1/3 ' ) Building H 1) All exterior signs on building except for building name sign, including: ADD Inc Architecture Design Development GENERAL NOTES -4- 22 October 1979 Signs - Pickering Wharf a) "Northshore Camera" a- Belt signs (approximately 81x 1-1/21 ) on north and south, elevations . , b) "Chamber of Commerce" a- Belt sign (approximately 61x l ' ) on north elevation. � b- Plaque sign (approximately 21x 1-1/21 ) on west elevation. C) "Odina Travel" a- Face signs (approximately 41x 21 ) on east And north elevations. b- Face sign (approximately 31x 1-1/2 ' ) on south elevation. c- Directional sign (approximately 3-1/21 x 1-1/21 ) on south elevation d- Office location sign (approximately 11x 1-1/21 ) on north elevation by entrance. . d)"No Bicyles on Sidewalk" a-, ' Sign (approximately 1-1/21 x 21 ) on west elevation. _-2) Interior tenant directory sign Building J 1) Building name sign in wrong location on east elevation. 2) "Flamingo for Men" a) Name and logo painted on store-front glass. 3) "Flamingo on the Wharf" a) Name and logo painted on store-front glass. Building K 1) "H. I . Cotton's" a) Belt sign (approximately 101x 1-1/21 ) on north elevation. Building L 1) "RHO Fashion Boutique" a) Belt sign (approximately 61x 1-1/21 ) on north elevation . b) Two plaque signs (approximately 1-1/21x 1-1�21 ) on either side of belt sign on north elevation . ADD Inc Architecture Design Development General Notes -5- 22 October 1979 Signs- Pickering Wharf 2) "Jade Tree" a) Three flat signs (one approximat'ely 81x 1-1/2 ' and two approximately 41x 1-1/21 ) on north elevation 3) IiVictoria Station" a) One additional "typical" sign than originally approved (only three approved by ADD Inc) . Four (excepting those on the project entrance sign) now exist : a� one large (51x 3' ) hanging b- one small (2�1/21x 1-1/.21 ) hanging c- two moderate (41x 21 ) surface mounted b) It was ADD Inc's understanding that the, location of the large hanging sign (a) was only temporary (during the extent of site/project construction) .' c) The applied letters to the second floor fascia (east elevatio and exterior lighting directed on sign and roof below. 4) "Marina Office Area" a) No signs approved, including: a- green and white "Dockmaster" sign (approximately 121Ix 8") b- green and white "Transient Dock-Register with Dockmaster" (approximately 3-1/21 x 11 ) Building 1) "Young Reflections" a) ADD Inc has not found any record of approving any signs or their locations, including: a- painted sign on shop window (south elevation) b- bracket sign (approximately 2-12/ 1x 31 ) hung on fascia of covered walkway (south elevation) c- belt sign (approximately 11x 71 ) on west elevation 2) "Mariners Cove" a) ADD Inc has not found any record of approving any signs or their locations, including: a-.. bracket sign (approximately 21x 1-1/2 ' ) .hung on fascia of covered walkway (south elevation) b- hanging sign (approximately 11x 31 ) below covered . walkway 3) "Cookie Cottage" . a) ADD Inc has .not found any record of approving any signs or their location, including: a- painted sign on shop window (south elevation) b- belt sign (approximately 1'x 61 ) on south elevation ADD Inc Architecture Design Development General Notes -6- 22 October 1979 Signs - Pickering Wharf Building M (continued) 4) Wilder-Manley Signs a) ADD Inc has not found any record of approving any signs or their locations, including : a- surface mount�ed sign (approximately 1-112 'x 2-1/21 ) on south elevation b- surface mounted sign (approximately 3-1/2 'x 21 ) on west elevation 5) ADD Inc has not found any record of approving the "Entrance" , sign (or its location) above the south elevation door between the "Cookie .Cottage" and the "Salem Seaport Museum" . 6) , "Salem Seaport Museum" a) Two "Free Museum" sandwich board signs (approximately 1-1/2 ?x 3-1/2 ' ) south and east entrances 7) "Putnam Pantry Candies" a) ADD Inc has not found any record of approving any signs, lights or their locations, including: a- hanging sign (approximately llx .4 ' ) below east elevation awning b- large belt sign (approximately 21x 251 ) on north elevation c- large belt sign (approximately 11x 151 ) on north elevation d- two lantern lights by entrance (north elevation) e- large surface mounted sign (approximately 61x 8 ' ) on west elevation 8) "Please Keep Off Grass" a) In grass area south-east of Building M C. 1166 Massachusetts Avenue ADD Inc Architecture Design Development Cambridge Massachusetts 02138 617 661 0165 Philip M Briggs Wilson F PollockJr 22 October 1979 GENERAL 90TES RE: LEASED GROUND FLOOR SPACE AT PICKERING WHARF Leased space as of 4 September 1979 (Information supplied by Paul Grant of Wilder-Manley Associates, Inc) . By each space pleasefind indicated: 1. The status of occupancy 15 October 1979 2. Whether ADD Inc has received final design drawings Bui lding A "Brandy's Pub" Occupied ADD Inc received final design drawings March 1979 and verbally approved the same, however, the rear stair )as built .was never approved by this office; exterior lights were never approved by ADD Inc. "Treasure Chest" - Not Occupied ADD Inc has received no design drawings. "Hearth and Eagle" - Not Occupied ADD Inc has received no design drawings. ".Space ACI� - Not leased or occupied "Space AD" - Not leased or occupied Building B "Shop at Papagallo" - Occupied - ADD Inc never received design drawings. "Leed's of Cape Cod" - Not Occupied - ADD Inc has received no design drawings. ADD Inc Architecture Design Development PICKERING WHARF -2- 22 October 1979 Leased Space "Let ' s Pretend" Occupied ADD Inc never received design drawings. Building C "Antique Quilts" Occupied ADD Inc never received design drawings. "Canniff ' s Men ' s Shop" - Occupied ADD Inc never received design drawings. "Paul Marks & Co. " - Occupied ADD Inc received preliminary plans and approved the same 29 May 1979. "Dan Chadwick Jewelers" - Occupied ADD Inc received final plans and approved the same 3 May 1979 Portion of Space "CD" - Not leased or occupied Space "CE" Not leased or occupied Building D "Crabtree & Evelyn" - Occupied ADD Inc never received design drawings. "Partridge Shop" - Occupied ADD Inc never received design drawings. I'Stoned Elephant" - Occupied ADD Inc received final plans and approved the same 13 March 1979. "Lorraine Roy" Occupied ADD Inc never received design drawings . ADD Inc Architecture Design Development PICKERING WHARF -3- 22 October 1979 Leased Space Building E "East Coast Outfitters" Occupied - ADD Inc never received design drawings . Space 11EB11 - Apparently leased to "East Coast Out fitters" as they now occupy the space. Building F "Peter Barter Florist" Occupied ADD Inc never received design drawi ngs. �"Country Curtains" - Occupied ADD Ind received plans and approved the same 29 May 1979. Building G "The Galley" "Argo Ray Bar" Occupied ADD Inc received preliminary plans. "Charlie Chengs of California" - Occupied ADD Inc never .received design drawings. "Juice Plus" - Occupied ADD Inc never received design drawings . "Bavarian Strudel Housel� Occupied. - ADD Inc never received design drawings . "Pastry Odessey" Occupied - ADD Inc neverreceived design drawings . "Souvlakill - Occupied ADD Inc never received design drawings. ADD Inc Architecture Design Development PICKERING WHARF -4- 22 October 1979 Leased Space Building G (Continued) "Look Ma! " - Occupied ADD Inc never received design drawings. "Scolas" - Occupied - ADD Inc never received design drawings. Building "Northshore Camera" - Occupied ADD Inc never received design drawings. "Salem Chamber of Commerce" Occupied ADD Inc has no record of receiving or approving the plans . Building J "Bewitching Yarns" Occupied ADD Inc never received design drawings. "Flamingo on the Wharf" - Occupied - ADD Inc never received design drawings. "Flamingo For Men" Occupied - ADD Inc never received design drawings. "Pearls & Pepper Jewelry" � Occupied ADD Inc received revised plans and approved the same 3 May 1979. Space "JE" - Not leased or occupied Space "JF" - Not leased or occupied ADD Inc Architecture Design Development PICKERING WHARF -5- 22 October 1979 Leased Space Building K "Elizabeth Bell Shop" Occupied ADD Inc received final plans and approved the same 13 March 1979. 11H. I . Cotton 's" - Occupied ADD Inc never received design drawings. "Hampshire House Restaurant" Not occupied Building L "RHO Fashion Boutique" - Occupied ADD Inc received plans and approved the same 27 August 1979. "Little Professor Books" � Occupied - ADD Inc never received design drawings. "Jade Tree" Occupied - ADD Inc approved plans IS June IW9. "MacDonald' s Candy" - Occupied ADD Inc never received design drawings. "Victoria Station - Occupied ADD Inc only received plans for exterior design of restaurant dated 26 February 1979 and rejected these. ADD Inc informed Victoria Station site architect/representative at the time we received the above plans that we did not approve : The multipane windows in the doors to the deck. 2. The bollards on the deck 3, The exterior light fixtures and standards. ADD Inc kchitecture Design Development PICKERING WHARF -6- 22 October 1979 Leased Space "Victoria Station (Continued) - The bubble skylights on the east elevation were never approved, in fact rejected, by ADD Inc. - ADD Inc later received July 1979 plan for new HVAC Mechanical Room and rejected the same (See field report #31, 24 August 1979) . Building M "Regina Pizzeria" - Not Occupied ADD Inc received architectural plans of July 1979 and approved all but the size of the bracket sign, 1 August 1979. "Cheesecake Company" Not Occupied ADD Inc received proposed elevation sketches and commented on the same 9 October 1979. "Yound Reflections" - Occupied ADD Inc has no record of receiving or approving the plans. "Mariner's Covell .- Occupied ADD Inc has no record of receiving or approving the plans. "Cookie Cottage" Occupied ADD Inc received plans and specifications and approved them with conditions. "Salem Seaport Museum" - Occupied - ADD Inc designed the museum exhibit "Voyage of the India Star" - Occupied White oak design coordinated design with ADD Inc. ADD Inc Architecture Design Development PICKERING WHARF -7- 22 October 1979 Leased Space "Putnam Pantry Candies" Occupied - ADD Inc received sketch of candy display September 1979. - ADD Inc has no record of receiving or approving other plans. Portion of .Shop "C" - Not leased or occupied ADD Inc does have plan for store layout for John Tuttle which is apparently Shop "C". 1166 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge Massachusetts 02138 ADD Inc Architecture Design Development 617 661 0165 Philip M Briggs Wilson F Pollock Jr 22 October 1979 GENERAL NOTES RE: AWNINGS AT PICKERING WHARF ALL AWNINGS INSTALLED AT PICKERING WHARF 15 OCTOBER 1979 Building A "Brandy's Pub" - One large green/reddish-brown/white awning - This particular awning never was approved by ADD Inc Building B "Shop at Pappagalloll - South elevation, blue barrel vault awning - This awning not approved by ADD Inc Building "Canniff 's Men' s Shop" - Dark "Maroon" awnings at north-west corner of building - These awnings not approved by ADD Inc (Ref. 24 August 1979 letter, ADD Inc to Wilder-Manley Associates) "Paul Mark's & Co. " - Brown awning to south of building - This awning not approved by ADD Inc . (Ref. memo 27 August 1979, ADD Inc to Jeff Shaw) Building D Eight (8) individual yellow awnings over second floor west windows These awnings are in conformance with the project awning package ADD Inc Architecture Design Development General Notes -2- 22 October 1979, Awnings at Pickering Wharf Building E No awnings Building F No awnings Building No awnings .Building H Six (6) green awnings over second floor south windows These awnings are in conformance with the project awning package Building J "Bewitching Yarns" - Blue awning over west window - This awning not approved by ADD Inc Building K No awnings Building L "RHO Fashion Boutique" - Blue awning over west window - This awning not approved by ADD Inc "MacDonald' s Candy" - Orange and white awning over north window - This awning not approved by ADD Inc ADD Inc Architecture Design Development General Notes -3- 22 October 1979 Awnings at Pickering Wharf Buidling M - Large green/beige/white awning along east elevation - This awning verbally approved by ADD Inc when original blue awning was replaced. 1166 Massachusetis Avenue Cambridge Massachusetts 02138 ADD Inc Architecture Design Development 617 661 0165 Philip M Briggs Wilson F Pollock Jr 22 October 1979 GENERAL NOTES RE: OFFICE SPACE AT PICKERING WHARF The only office space for which ADD Inc has received plans: Office CG (2nd floor) - EG & G Proposed office space plan of 6/5/79 Received by ADD Inc 8/6/79 1166 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge Massachusetts 02M ADD Inc Architecture Design Development 617 661 0165 Philip M Briggs Wilson F PollockJr 22 October 1979 GENERAL NOTES RE: SITEWORK AND LANDSCAPING During the course of construction, the Pickering Wharf site plan has been altered in many ways. Stairs, walls, stone "outeroppings", various paving and planting details, and a number of unspecified plants were introduced to the site. The as-built conditions do not fully reflect any plans on file with our office (the original of 1977, revis- sions to this plan through 1978, or the most recent planting plan of 5 March 1979. This planting plan was drawn by Bill Pressley's office specifically at the owner's request and only after Mr. Pressley's consultation with Arthur Collins at the site) . ADD Inc is disappointed in the final architectural qualities of the site. We particularly regret : 1) The, loss of the large linden and sugar maple trees at the intersection of Pickering Way and Wharf Street and their replacement with smaller maples and flower beds , backed by unscreened A/C condensing units and a transformer elevated on a brick pedestal . 2) The use of single family residential scale shrubs and the spacing of the same in planting beds throughout the site. 3) The loss (?) of the row of Washington Hawthorns -along the east property line of the project ( "behind" Building A) 4) The loss of the textured parking lanes along Wharf Street 5) The seawalk: a) The surface (Concrete pavement) b) The guardrails and brick posts c) The typical 112 x 4" bench design d) The chain�Link fence marina entrances ADD Inc Architecture Design Development General Notes -2- 22 October 1979 Sitework and Landscaping 6. The "barrel bollards" and chains in and along roads and walks. 7) The concrete planter boxes. 8) The loss of the gazebo. 9) The abundance of low stone walls and "outcroppings" . 10) The number of steps in several of the walkways. Also we are concerned about human safety on the project . 1) There are several instances of walkways which shoul,d have hand or guardrails, one or two are of questionable width. 2) There are projecting stone walls and/or "outeroppings" in the vicinity of Building D which are very dangerous. 3) The seawalk is being heaved by the movement of the seawall causing cracks in the seawalk. 4) There are many paved areas on which water stands after rainstorms. If this water is not drained from these surfaces, not only will there be freezing and thawing problems in the winter, but "sheets" or ice which will be dangerous underfoot . 5) Not all exterior stairs/steps have handrails. In addition to the above, there are other site related items of concern to this office . Many of these follow: 1) Lights a) Lights on Brandy's Pub deck never approved by this office (See General Notes - Leased Ground Floor Space, 10/22/79) b) Lights on Victoria Station deck never approved by this office (See General Notes - Leased Ground Floor Space, 10/22/79 c) Small bollard lights ("Type B") - These lights are too bright . Some time ago this office inquired of the salesman whether an amber sleeve could be made to cut the glare of these lights. We were informed by the ADD Inc Architecture Design Development General Notes -3- 22 October 1979 Sitework and Landscaping salesman that he had been approached by someone from Pickering Wharf and was investigating the matter for him. d) We are curious as to why the tenant/shop entrance lights are hung from the signage bands on all buildings except for D & J where they are attached below this band. 2) No fences have been installed around the A/C condensing units (See Memo to Jeff Shaw from Tucker Shields 13 September 1979) 3) We recommend that the flower boxes atop the Building M Congress Street facade be removed. 4) The handrail by the Paul Marks Cheese Shop (South elevation Building C) was not approved by ADD Inc. 5) The "Sippity" vending cart by the Paul Marks Cheese Shop was not approved by ADD Inc. 6) The bike racks on the site were not approved by ADD Inc . 7) The "double-decker" A/C condensing unit racks behind Building L and Building F (See transmittal to John Pina from Tucker Shields, 6/27/79) were not approved by ADD Inc. The "double- decker rack between Buildings C & D was not built as designed by ADD Inc (See SK-CD1,2,3 dated 6/27/79) . 8) The "Coke" and ice machine by the mechanical room to the south of Building L (Victoria Station) were not approved by ADD Inc. 9) The installed traffic control gates (Auto - Gate G89, Automatic Parking Devices, Inc. ) are not those specified (parking gate Model 121, the Cincinnati Time Recorder Company - See Memo to Jim Van Sickle from Tucker Shields 10/5/78) 10. The monument to the Salem Frigate" (By Seawalk to the east of the project) was not approved by ADD Inc. 11. No deck planter boxes, tables, chairs, and umbrellas (Victoria Station and Brandy's Pub) were approved by ADD Inc. ADD Inc ArchitWure Design Development General Notes -4- 22 October 1979 Sitework and Landscaping 12 Several of the buildings are poorly stained in particular Building G. 13) Marina ADD Inc has had little to do with the marina since we laid out the piers and located the gang ways. However, we find unfortunate the several marina sheds , metal gangways, and chain�link fence entrances. 1166 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge Massachusetts 02138 ADD Inc Architecture Design Development 617 661 0165 Philip M Briggs Wilson F Pollock Jr 23 October 1979 LA Mr. Tom Leonard Salem Five Cent ' Savings Bank. 210 Essex Street Salem, MA 01970 Re: Pickering Wharf Dear Mr. Leonard: To date ADD Inc has understood that it had the consent of the project owners and the Planning Department of the City of� Salemi through the Salem Architectural Design Review Board, to . review and comment on design changes regarding the above pro- ject. We understood this review and comment procedure would apply to additions to all buildings and the. site, including tenant spaces, signs, awnings, lighting, and related matters affecting the overall design of the project . A process for reviewing these matters was established at the outset of the project and is presented, as it applies to tenant spaces, in the Tenant Design Criteria Manual of 1 December 1977. On several occasions, ADD Inc has supplied Wilder-Manley Associates , Inc. with copies of this manual to present to both prospective andsigned tenants. However, often changes are made, and signs and exterior elements attached to the buildings, which have not been approved by ADD Inc or the Salem Architectural Design Review Board. These elements, changes in the site .plan, and the unapprov- ed building additions are affecting the intended character and quality ofthe project. In the past , ADD Inc has provided lists of approved finished spaces and related architectural/design elements to aid the project owners, the Salem Architectural Design Review Board, and Wilder-Manley Associates in determining what has been approv- ed by this office. Jeff Shaw of Wilder-Manley Associates repeat- edly has assured ADD Inc that , when time allows, any unapproved signs, awnings, lights, and related elements will be removed or submitted to this office for review and comment . Consequently, ADD Inc has kept the bulk of its critical comments regarding the sitework and exterior building treatment to "on site" comments to those concerned (contractors, owners and/or leasing agents) . ADD Inc Architedure Design DevelopmeM Mr. Tom Leonard -2- 23 October 1979 However, following our 10 October 1979 meeting with the Salem Architectural Design Review Board, we have decided to provide herewith lists of many of the built or installed design elements and tenant spaces we have hot approved. Included in this package - 1) General Notes Re: Signs at Pickering Wharf 22 October 1979 2) General Notes Re: Leased Ground Floor Space at Pickering Wharf 22 October 1979 3) General Notes Re: Awnings at Pickering Wharf 22 October 1979 4) General Notes Re: 0,ffice Space at Pickering Wharf 22 October 1979 5) General Notes Re: Sitework and Landscaping at Pickering Wharf 22 October 1979 Sincerely, R. Tucker Shields RTS:lc cc: Robert Bramble Tim Smith Bob Gallivan Jeff Shaw Salem Architectural Design Review Board Phil Briggs 1166 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge Massachusetts 02138 ADD Inc Architecture Design Development 617 661 0165 7 December 1979 Mr. Jeff Shaw Mr. Bob Gallivan Wilder-Manley Associates, Inc . Tancook Crescent Bldg. , 9 Pickering Way Salem, MA 01970 RE: Pickering Wharf Dear Sirs: This office rejects the freestanding valet parking shelter designed for Victoria Station by James H. Ballou of Salem (drawings dated 10/27/79) . We reject this structure aesthetically and in principle for reasons previously stated in Phil Briggs' letter to Tom Leonard of 30 August 1979. We do not feel the overbuilding of this site should be allowed to continue, particularly to the advantage of particular tenants; We trust those who condoned the addition to the Pub of Building A have not established an undesired precedent for such overbuilding. Following the meeting at your office this past Friday, Nov. 30tly, ' 'had the opportunity to walk the project and noted several new � slgns and awnings in place, a few of these previously rejected by this office. What do you intend to do about the growing. _ number of unapproved signs and awnings? Your offic.e . certainly has had time to respond to our correspondence regarding these items (the most recent dated- 22 October 1979) .: , Also, you might review my. memo of 1 3 September 1979 which followed my September 12th meeting with the Salem Architectural Design Review Board. At this meeting, the Board accepted several building changes ,with the conditions that 1) the tower be built as. approved by them and 2) the fences be installed around the air-conditioning condensing units. A few of these building ch I anges . have been completed and yet the tower remains unfinii3hed and the condensing units not fenced. -------------- ADD Inc Architecture Design Devefopment Mr. Jeff Shaw, Mr. Bob Gallivan 2 7 December 1979 I also had the opportunity on Friday to review the lettering on the Sunwheel Studios signage band. These letters are noticeably "plastic" and, therefore, are not in conformance with the Tenant Design' Criteria Manual. I shall be away from the office for about a month beginning December 12th. Should you have need of someone at this office, please direct your inquiries to Catherine Knight . Sincerely, R. Tucker Shields cc: Phil Briggs, ADD Inc Paul Grant, Wilder-Manley Assoc. - Catherine Knight, ADD Inc Tom Leonard, Salem Five Cents Savings Bank -/Salem Architectural Design Review Board RTS:jg ----------—--------- MR!U -Sve-4opment "Z-UTWE 0.�,CT.R. Rhority Jo"N W. BARRETT ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 744-6900 THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD MAY ll,, 1977 Present: Robert Scagli Otti, Helen Baldwin, Elizabeth Padjen, Ronald Barnes, Norbert Florendo, David Jaquith and Associate Members, Staley McDermet and Daniel Mansur Tihe .f011owing items were discussed: PICKERING WHARF PROJECT Final design drawings were presented showing the treatment of the: additional theater building, the entrance on Congress Street, the second level to house the control system and I landscaping treatment. There were no major changes ' eag Trust Bank. t � made on the previous drawings submitted except with the treatmen of the wall behind the Naumk It was noted that the wall is in bad shape and the developers with a combination of materials, brick with the high presented a treatment board. and clapboard, Portion being clap- The Board agreed the combination of materials would make a better appearance since the wall is so large and that an all clapboard treatment would be overpowering. The DRB requested that thedeveloper submit drawings 50% complete. DRB ACTION: Approved the preliminary drawings as submitted SRA ACTION: Approved the Preliminary drawings The DRB discussed the letter received from the SRA in regard to pho tographs of signs. Helen Baldwin noted that she has slides of various the m to the DRB. signs and would be willing to show It was agreed the DRB will make arrangements to view the slides after its next meeting and make a selection as to what would be acceptable and have them developed. MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD APRIL 13, 19-,; Page 3 ESSEX COUNTY COURTHOUSE - Mr. Walker, Whitman-& Foward, Inc.. (Ronald Barnes abstaining., from vote) The DRB reviewed the sidewalk treatment around the Courthouse building. D.RB ACTION: Approved the change from originally accepted scheme. The DRB reviewed the proposed sign "FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF ESSEX" to appear in deep cast aluminum letters 10" high in Elite type style. DRB ACTION: Approved size and location SRA ACTION: Approved MARKET STALL Angela LeBlanc, Bob Ohlson A prefabricated trolley car mock-up to be erected within the perimeter of the market stall was proposed. Stipulation being that the structure is temporary and may be dis- assembled at term of lease (Oct.) . The intent of the structure is to house and provide security for necessary machinery and equipment. Discussion followed on the appropriateness of a Railroad/Trolley car in a market stall. DRB ACTION: Vote 2 against use of the trolley scheme, 4 for possibility of its develop- ment and use. The DRE requested resubmittal, of no less than 2 proposals, each depicting .scale elevations (front & side) positioned in market stall. ( The DRB advises to return with two suggested treatments: #1-trolley in garage scheme and #2-trolley station) The DRB will then vote to accept one or the other. At this time the Board discussed the necessity for communication between the Market Commission and the SRA. The Executive Director was instructed to communicate with the Market Commission recommending they have a meeting with the DRB to discuss the sign ordinan( PICKERING WHARF Mr. Phillip Briggs A schematic presentation was made depicting additional building (M) acquired by recent land purchase. New scheme allows access to site from Congress Street. Building "M", originally an old warehouse, will now house a theatre and retail stores. Additional land also allows for improved parking and traffic flow. The, DRB supports the design and its continuation. DRB finds. the addition "M" as a good transition point from street side to interior site. fFES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD NOV. 9, 1977 Page 2 SALON BOCCACIO - The Board reviewed the preliminary presentation of the projecting sign for the Central St. . location and approved the placement of the 2 inch letters on both windows and requested a resubmission of drawings showing bracket, place- ment and method of attachment. DRB ACTION: Approved two inch letters on the windows requested resubmissio' n SRA ACTION: No action at this time CHATaER OF CONMERCE - Janet Parker, Chamber Director requested approval of the Christiia_�secora�tions and the bracket to be attached to the poles within the Essex Street Mall. DRB ACTION: Approved the mall decoration and bracket subject to approval by �he SRA's Project Engineer and subject to removal of the bracket after the decorations have been removed from the poles and that should the light poles be damaged in any way, the Chamber of Commerce will correct the damage. SRA ACTION: Approved with the conditions noted above. Toy Emporium - Formal presentation was made showing the sign, colors, method of attach- ment for the Front St. toy. store. The sign will project out four feet, plexi-glass material and will be backlighted. There will be one sign on the front of the building and another at the rear of the building. Letters will be approximately 6" high, the sign will be 4 ft. by 19 ft. The DRB suggested that the color scheme on the sign be reversed. It was agreed that the correction will be made in the write up for the sign to reverse the color scheme. DRB ACTION: Approved. SRA ACTION: Approved PICKERING IMARF - David Lash of the Salem Planning Dept. advised the Board that the DRB's role in tFe-review of the plans for the Pickering Wharf would be the same, advisory Board to the Planning Dept. It was agreed in the negotiations for the development of Pickering Vlarf that the City needed an advisory Board and the DRB has been established in this capacity. Actual approval will be made by the Planning Dept. The DRB -reviewed the f inal construction plans for buildings B, F. and H. The Board was advised that there have been no mass changes made since the last N pres ntation other than use of Bird Architectural Shingles (345) and will probably be Ised on all buildinas -rather than wood shingles. The DRB approved final construction drawings for buildings B. F. and H. L76S OF THE SRA MEETING HELD NOV. 9, 1977 Page 3 The DRB noted that they would like to hav- Mr. David Lash Planning Dept. , keep the DRB advised of any major changes made- on the project and submit samples of brick,!, paint, etc. for approval before proceedingg with any construction work. The DRB members noted that a presentation of this type has not really be reviewed the way that it should. 1he project is complex and should be studied in detail. It was requested that should another project be submitted for review, the DRB should have the opportunity to review one building at a time to see how it relates to e total project. CHURCH ST. - Maguire Bros. The DRB was advised that the Building Inspector's office advised the owner of the building that hand rails must be installed. A 13-�" diameter pipe was proposed for three areas. After discussion it was agreed that two hand rails would be installed, as per drawing, subject to the rails being welded pipe, grounded smooth and painted black. DRB ACrION: Approved SRA ACHON: Approved SALEM EVENING NEWS Oscar Padjen submitted final construction drawings. No major changes were made. The only change is the location of the glass window which was installed for emergency-purposes. Mr. Padjen noted that they are having difficulty obtaining water struck brick. The DRB made a field trip to view the sample brick panel. After DRB review the panel was approved. DRB ACrION: Approved final construction drawings SRA ACTION: Approved Singer sketch submitted - The DRB felt that the submission was not sufficient for review and requested resubmission in accordance with DRB requirements in the sign manual. SAVORY & QUINN SIGN - A field trip was made to review the sign to be placed in the center of the end elevation of the building (directly beneath the ridge).The bottom of the sign is to be level with the top of the second floor sill. The DRB was advised that the sign had been approved but when it was made by the �ontractor is was not in accordance with' the specifications. DRB ACTION: Approved sign and bracket SRA ACFION: No action until the Board has had an opportunity to look at the si gn- Respectfully submitted, Ethel Crowell J SalernH tXECUTIVE DIRECT04 �OHN W_ 8ARRE� Redevelopment Authority ONE SALE M GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 7.44-6900 MUTES OF THE SPECIAL TvEETING OF THE DESI(N REVIEW BOARD JAN. 25, 1978 The members of the DRB met in special session with the following present: Robert Scagliotti, Elizabeth Padjen, Helen Baldwin and David Jaquith. The Board reviewed drawings for the Pickering Wharf Project, Building "G" and building "J" Building "C' will be located at the Union Street side of the project area. The building will be a two story wood frame structure and they will pick up the theme of the surrounding buildings in regard to height, material, etc. It is- proposed to use cedar shingles on this particular building because of the round roof. They will install wood frame, double hung windows. - -Dt_-5 :5� " C�-� Fcp- C-�'ew Ci� I kD cs=) L_c)J �Awh�olecoloro.a_cQe will be presented at a later meeting -rather than to a 0� r s e e a or one building at a time. A large landscaping plan is to be sub- mitted for the whole area which would include the brick paving and large trees. DRB ACTION: Approved building IV as presented. Drawings for building "J" were.submitted for review. The building will be situated adjacent to the parking area. Office space will be located on the second floor with retail on the ground floor. There is the possibility. of locating a restaurant in this particular building. It was noted that the leasing program has been very successful for the whole project. There will be-no trash duTipsters allowed to be visible within t��roec�t ar 11 trash is to be located in a refrigerated room, in designated buildings. V D ACTION: Approved buil ing as su na e'. 'JI uJ L du 3 vis ib in de a r i r d r ' le 1 b n ra s ter allo' ed to be , 7 s oom' re wi ll_ t ash i to be located efr ge ate D ACTIO, D ov uil as su N A ed b in2 m e le in 'e gro-ect ar si, M -1 gs_ in rnat d buV d ,jjE-S OF THE DRB NEETING HELD FEB. 22, 1978 Page 2 I/TThh,7,� r to the upper floors. 'j"he retail section will be set back re %rill be an elevato seven feet to form an arcade to the prop-rty .'-in-. The building will be longer along Front Street with the back elevation. similar to the front. The -roof will be pitched. The DRB commented. on the number of windows proposed. Mr. Scagliotti advised the Board that there must be so much window. -space I T-)er' floor space-.- Mr. Scagliotti al I so noted that he would like to have the option to install either pivot windows or double hung windows. There will be skyl.ights along the pitched roof but they will not be seen fro I m the sidewalk due to the pitch of the roof. d. on the deck The air conditioning systems for each apartment will be enclose so that they cannot be seen from the sidewalk. The drainage system will be interior construction. DRB A I CTION: '(Robert Scagli I otti refrained. from voting) Preliminary plan approved SRA ACTION: Approved ADD INc. PjCKER1NTG WHARF PRO JECT The DRB reviewed two new buildings:"10' Building 'IV' was noted to be the largest building in the complex. The first floor will be occupied by a restaurant, upper floors will have twelve apartments. The building will be wood frame construction (facing the water) , dark shingled roof, double hung windows; the same type of construction as the other buildings. There will be a parking area to the -rear of the building which will be screened in by trees. Building "IQ' will also accomm6datea restaurant and apartments. Construction will be brick veneer and granite veneer with weathered cedar shingles along the east section. There will be a lease with people in the area to allow for additional parking Page 3 1,iUIT-S OF THE DRB �JEFTING HELD FEB. 22, 1979 4' Tnhe Board bad no r s oloT_ a re me as gd th t t col che each buil ote a he c yes nt fo i w n It was noted that the Colors are The DRB discussed the color scheme for each building us c m�s - as presented. objection to the color scheme The Ii uTg project. similar to that of the Williamsburg 10 en- th f e ing signs are to be en- ee g The free stand e project signs- , identify the project Nlill The Boar st building to by -removing thc claP- ,��cevjewed th 1,Tood. �ghe sign located on the talle grave4 e and wi actually become a part of the building be quite larg ss the si into the building-1 I boards t I o rece and scale for the sign Was .not presented so that the Board The actual type face ssion be made showing the , The Board requested that a resubmi d in� rmation- The Board 'would could relate to it. and detaile lo actual type face to be used, color samples, also like to see the alternatives that were rejected. -ked. GZ through G8, th e DRB approved the In regard to the sign presentation mar location, size and aTchitectuT'e only. vertical lettering On Ule tower Helen Baldwin stated that she did not approve the vi-, d roval. e 3Boardwas advised p s L esented for af '71 - C_ A sign, manual for the project Was Irr tenants' lease. that, if approved, the manual would become a part of the 1,11 relieve the D -oval �f the s- manual would i��ect. a cul�� J the PrO)ecL Ir tenant in e�ac a Id hy the PiCKeTin: be J\,i�WeLMMIL 11 be ea4�01_ c -iich signs id Lash (PlaDni"Lg Dept') that san It was also noted by the DRB and Dav r the City ordinance are not allo_�"ed uncle Approved buildings "V "V r all the buildings DRB ACTION. Approved the color scheme.as Presented fo - 1-.ype face to be submitted e and. arcbitecture App-roved sign location, s1z Approved sRetches G2 through G8 al being In3de a part of The approved subj ect to the manu e with said manual Sign manual e in accoTdanc. and that all signs are to b SBA ACTION: No action necessary C ,�LLF MARINE ARTS Ry - James Ballou for parcel RC�10 (Liberty Fsex Tepare a plan. g in order to gain some inputfrc)m YW. Ballou has been assigned to P x. Kiernan attended the mectin St.) . Mr. Ballou and Y the DRB with respect to des'�gn' story building be con- iat a tWO scussion, it was recommended tl a floor. INIr. Kie-rnan advised the After a lengthy di perhaps a tenant for the secon i� structed on the site - e to 'ISUrance policy restrictions Boa-rd th at thi s would b e im possible du �S OF ITIE DRB �EETING I�MCH 22, 1978 Page 2 che following recommendations: 1. The double rowlack brick coursing be in the same plane as the building (more detail is required on the plan) . 2. Recommend some type of barrier across the loading area with the possibility ,of reducing the curb cut to prevent all day parking. 3. The addition which contains the office, the cornice. is to be treated similar to the main building. 4. Show the existing sidewalk so that your site work relates to the existing work. DRB ACTION: No approval given SRAL ACTION: Tabled Front Street Site George & Robert Maguire David Jaquith refrained from voting since he is representing.the proposed developer. Final drawings were presented. The only change from the previous submission is the removal of two windows at the -rear of the building. The DRB recommended the use of lead copper for all flashing (16 oz.) . The shingles, brick samples and mechanical drawings will be submitted at a later meeting. The developer will install lintels on the third floor end opening and the horizontal band between the first floor windows should be duranotic bronze and not wood. DRB ACTION: Approved SRA ACTRIN: Proposal withdrawn Add Inc. - Pickering Wharf The DPB reviewed drawings for buildings "D" & "E" prior to the meetin and approved the dra7.,Tin.as, as subm it-Led. 9 At the recommendation of the DRB that the method of construction for the tower be restudied, the architect advised the Board that they have solved the problem by using tonWe and roove cons truction. _�IE groove DRB MHAINU M-Ll) I'l:MU14 ZZ, IJID ,,S OF TiL The landscaping plan was reviewed by jch�! IiDs and his recoffnendations were referred to the DRB. - Cf�� he trees where there is Add Inc. agreed to place V — U ; paving.� t was �rate aroiind rea, �Is? agreed to place a hedge below the trees to screen the cars in the paRing a tf o d TLj �1 T acin 11�"6Wice ar �:Lino acin�� fiery "Boston Cardeh" benches will be installed. Bollards will be utilized to tie up bicycles and bollard type lights will beplaced along the water front Path and at each entrance way. The DRB reviewed the "Pickering Wharf" and theater signs. DRB ACTION: Approved buildings "IT & "Elf 41 Approved the method of construction for the tower Approved the color blue submitted for the."Pickering Wharf" sign Agreed the sign presentation (letter spacing) will be revised and copy of the revision will be fo-nqarded to the DRB - approved on that basis. Landscaping plan approved with minor modifications. SRA ACTION: No action necessary. Respectfully submitted, Ethel C. Crowell PICURING I%TIARF I\TC. - UhKINU INr The DRB reviewed buildings and Building 'IN' will be the only gaffb-foll buii�ing in the terial will c clapboard and weathered shingles. Thefe �vlll probably be a pub type operation ie Upper f1oors. There will be a deck for on the first floor and apartments on tl regard to the storage shed, it was recommended each apartment on the second floor.. In rage shed from the south side to the architect that he consider relocating the sto to the north side of. the building. a minor revision recommended to the architect. DRB ACTION: Approved building "A!' with SPA ACTIoNI: No action necessary. Building "C" was reviewed. it is to be clapboard construction for office and retail use. For project identity there will be a tower with "Pickering Wharf" on each side o" the tower, with a stairway to the top. Construction will be 0 f I �w pl�%�ood. It was considered to have the Chamber of Commerce,in that building in order to 0 control the use of the tower but the Chamber of Commerce decided on another location for its office. A lengthy discussion was held on the method of construction relating to the tower joints and the pos.sible problems that could arise in the future if.1�the joints are not treated in the right manner. thod of detail on the treatm�eritfor� DRB ACTION: Approved the architecture but not the method of detail on the treatment for the tower joints. ssary SPA ACTION: No action necessary The Board discussed the "Pickering Wharf" sign for building (facing the back of of the buildinu.�Approval was -requested on the the bank) and a sign for the gable end colors and "Baskerville" type face. The sign for the theater was also discussed. the sign member of the Board had strong feelings in favor of, and opposed to, Each Ang a poll of the Board, three voted in favor and three opposed to presented. After tal� a Stat" sign for the Theater. the "Indi it was based on the presentation, could not come to an agreement, Since the Board Add Inc. will resubmit a proposal for the sign, consult their graphic artist for agreed ckerina Wharf" sign and come back letter spacing, change the shade of blue on the "Pi with a complete package. A special meeting will be held for this purpose. 2 W JOHN W. BARRETT sledevelopment Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHO14E 744-6900 MUTES OF THE NEETINIG OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD WEINESDAY, JUNE lit, 1978 The members of the Design Review Board held its meeting on Wednesday, June 14, 1978 at One Salem Green with the following members present: Robert Scagliotti, Helen Baldwin, Norbert Florendo, Elizabeth Padjen and David Jaquith. The Board -reviewed the following proposals: Parcel RC-11) for George Aulson - presented by David Jaquith (D. Jaquith refrained from voth David Jaquith presented working drawings for the proposed new building behind the old 0 fire station building. The new building has been increased in size from 621 to 651 Windows on the first level will all be tempered glass. As recommended, windows will be located on the Federal Street side of the buildina. The reason for the middle door being place off center is that there will be a stairway behind the fixed glass� The building will have electric heat.All visible drains will be lead coated copper. DRB ACTION: Drawings were approved as submitted subject to submission of final contract drawings. SRA ACTION: Approved subject to receipt of final contract documents Pickering Wharf, Inc. - Add Inc. Drawings were presented for building "B" and building "L". It was requested that they be able to use asphalt :shingles in place of the approved metal roof. A lengthy discussion was held on the proposed change (the Clerk was not able to remain to take notes for this segment of the meeting) . DRB ACTION: Approved asphalt shingles for building "B" Building "L" - no changes allowed FAt this time it was noted that there has been a nu-iber of changes made during the con- struction of The overall plan that dev-,ate from the drmqinggs that were approved. David Lash from thS,,Zlanning Dept. attended the meeting to discuss the matter of unauthorized changes. I=Tt was requested that the Planning Dept. notify the owners of Pickering Wharf that they attend a DRB meeting to discuss the changes and advise them that 'they are in violation of the contract with the City of SaleaQ L�D�RB ACTION: Approved to reduce the ten Sugar Ivhple trees from 10" to 6" in diameter. Fage z DRB IVEETING HELD JUI\IE 14, 1978 4UMS OF T[IE piCiTRING INTIARF (Continued) 0� Building "0' - The DRB accepts the deletion of the greenhouse as designed Thd substituted sketches as submitted by Add Inc. dated June 12, 1979 - changes will include a redesign on the mullion detail and relocate the skylight over the shear 1 1%Tall. Revised drawings will be submitted by Add Inc. Asian Gallery - Salem Sign Co. (for Daniel.Low's Warehouse Building) Yz. Paul Fannell noted that Asian Gallery has taken the iihole first level- Proposed to install three flags and two signs. The DRB noted that the building is almost entirely hidden by the I trees and it is difficult to see what is in the building. . one sign will be 30", and the other 17". a it was recommended that they use duck cloth. As far as the banners are concerned, The material presented was too fine. DRB ACTIGN: Type face approved, subject to tightening up on the letter spacing. Location will be on a .30 inch pillar and the 17 inch pillar, 6 ft. high. on the cloth Banners will be held in abeyance until a decision is made t the lower edge of the bamboo is to be eased over :and color. The spacing a to the -right edge. OSRA ACTIOM: Approved . Book Store on Central St 1 (13 Central Salem Sign ond level and the other beside It was proposed to have .two signs, one on the sec the stairway. it was noted by !the DRB I that a hanging sign would be -more effective. d something that would be as simple The owner of the book store noted that she wante ot traffic customers. as possible. The type of business that they have does not warrant fo After reviewing the building, color of the existing paint, YT. Fannell noted that his client agreed on having one large sign on the second floor, 24" x W'. imitation gold paint on black paint, DRB ACTION: Approved the second floor sign color: border to be painted black. SRA ACTION: Approved I11NU ��V 'Jul"M -LD-1-I-JTC5- Page 3 XKERING MARF A general meeting was held with the owners of Pickering Viharf to discuss past changes made deviating from the approved drawings and future procedures to follow when any changes are made in the site work. It was noted that the flag poles installed are not the same as those approved on the previous __�ted. Mr. Collins, representing Pickering Wharf, noted that he thought the poles would be in keeping with Salem and it was felt that the poles should have some nautical motif. Ron Barnes noted that the DRB should have been notified of the change in the plan. In response, Mr. Collins stated that it has been their intent, in whatever changes were made, to up-grade the project in every respect. For the record, three members of the DRB voted in favor of the poles, one in opposition. Mx. Collins also noted that many times it is necessary to make lan_im_ffimecF�11—a�t_e decision on the site when changes becomenecessary and it was not their intent to cir- ent the DRB's approval. It was ag=�.-d that_fut��chan�es will be submitted to the DRB when immediate changes are necessary, the DRB will e ria awa-lLao e ION: Flag poles approved as installed A�. SRA ACTION: No action necessary ASIA HOUSE It was requested that theowner of the Asia House be allowed to install an air- conditioning unit on the Daniel Low building on the north side of the building between the second and third story windows DRB ACFION1- Approved SRA ACTION: Approved --7 XETING HELD AUGUST 9, 1978 Page 2 WffING FOR THE NORTR GREENWAY The DRB reviewed I the sketches presented by John Collins and they have no objection to the proposed lights for the greemiay- DRB ACTION: Approved SRA ACTION: Approved BISTRO LE BISTINGO SI(N (Formerly LaStrega) The owner of the restaurant presented a proposal for a. sign. The sign will be 11' x 6' located flush to the wall. The color scheme will be rust, brown and creme tone with soft lights (11 watt) around the border to light up the sign. The DRB approved the sign as proposed subject to the holes being filled in when the existing signs are removed. The Board was advised that they would like to place a menu box at the entrance and would like to advertise valet parking, as well as a sign for the rear of the building. The owner was advised that sandwich signs are not allowed in the city and perhaps er arrangements can be made to adverti se valet parking. A resubmission will be made at theAug. 17th meeting. On Aug. 17 a proposal was submitted for the sign for the rear of the building,, 8'6" x I lit with a 7 watt lamp, to be, located over the doorway. DRB ACTION: Front and rear sign approved as submitted SRA ACTIGN: Approved Oscar Padjen attended the meeting tol6scuss the 181 Essex St. facade project. This meeting was merely for the purpose of discussion. No action taken. PICIMRING INHARF David Lash, Planning Dept. attended the meeting to discuss the Pickering Wharf signs. He .noted that some of the signs in the area are temporary but he would like to see all the traffic signs designed by one company, preferably a graphic designer so that all the signs will be uniform. U1, .. ... . in reaard to the tenant signs, he would prefer to see them approved by Add Inc. me in to the DRB with every tenant sign. -nd not co * The matter of Putnam Pantry Candies situation was discussed. He felt that letier Shade is becoming involved in a sign situation that has nothin I g todo with the awning, and it is unfair to him. The Board agreed to take a field trip to look at the Putnam Pantry sign- After review of the Putnam Pantry Candies building the Board approved a IS" stripe, A proposal was presented by David Lash for ..the rehabilitation of the Russian Club building and the Amoco Gas Station building. The B�oard agreed to look at the.buildings first in order to relate the drawings to gr U lu" L L1� buil While on the field trip the DRB approved the changes for building "Y' as submitted on drawing dated 7/14/78 and the landscape chanues on drawing dated 7/S/78. rame or re r�ishe��; Russ' uil existinng window s�ash should be -replaced or refurbished; frame, -n _�jae should be p-a-i-nt-eT-Ulack; color sample of new stucco should be submitted; a canopy design ted. I)Lra; s ar should be resubmitted; air conditioner should be reloca ,�ri mitted. 4�oor- z too-k- -EMMMMP� Amoco Gas Station Buildia - Existing Derby St. facade should remain; color of stucco sHobe Fsmittfeiiay value suggested) ; left side elevation should be built up to ight as shown; should be no cornice but should have a simple cap. New windows on front elevation should have silicone joints. Drawings will be re- submitted. DRB ACTION: changes on building "A!' and landscape changes =1 19' stripes for the Putnam Pantry Candies awning Resubmission required for Russian Club and Amoco Gas Station Marine Arts brick samples Approved Kane Gonic, Harvard Smooth Antique. Mortar will be the same as the City Hall Vault building. The Board was advised they will start excavating forthe th of August. foundation during the mon DRB ACTION: Approved brick samples SRA ACTION: Approved :7- -:7 1ES 01: '111E DESIM' REVIDV BOARD 1,1EETING 13, 19-8 Page 3 After discussion it was agreed to itokr- L- -,'4,--Id trip to inspect the building and ifter inspection, the following commentS were :.-.ade by the DRB: The brick sample, as submitted for the front and rear sections is approved-. 2. Second floor eyebrow detail on the windows will be designed to match the . existing detail. 3. The new roof is to be black to match the existina black asphalt shingles 4. All existing brick on the front of the building sohall be pressure cleaned. S. Vinyl clad wood shutters will be submitted for approval. 6. MO Plywood sign board, with trim detail shall be submitted for approval along with color samples of sign paint an'd all trim. 7. Rear brick chimney shall be cleaned and all brick work shall be patched, as necessary. 8. Drawings showing brick veneer for two building protrusions, including window designs, are approved. DRB ACTION: Approved all item noted above SRA ACTION: Approved recommendations above Recommended the large second floor window remain as IS. PICKERING IaARF Plans were presented showing a change on building "J". The original proposal was for office space and the developers are changing the second floor to residential use. The view from the building is nothing but a parking lot. They would like to install- greenhouses and they would have to combine some of the window sections to make room for the installation. T There b ome d imer change will e s 0 s and elevat' CDRBhere will be some dormer changes and eleva n changes because of the greenhouses. TION jI A=CTION: Approved changes for building ".T' Salon Ondina (Daniel Low Warehouse building) Derby Sq. A sketch was submitted for the sign, lettering, method of attachment and color.I The sign maker will be using 2" solid stock for a two sided sign. The Board recommended that the sign hanger be brought out to the very end of jhe sign for better appearance. The Board apprNed the placement over the doorway. The sign shall be no less than 8 ft. from the sidewalko. DRB ACTION: Approved as noted above SRA ACTIGN: Approved Respectfully submitted, Ethel C. Crowell MINUTES OF 1HE DRB WETING HELD FEB. 14, 1979 Page 4 The Board felt that they could relate to the themes better, if they could see drawings. David Lash of the Planning Dept. explained that this meeting is primarily to get an input as to which direction we would take in making a final presentation. It was agreed that possible alternatives should be presented at another meeting showing the interior and exterior of a residential building; rehabilita- tion work going on during the construction period. Pickering Wharf The Architect, Phil Briggs, emphasized that he will keep the DRB informed of changes made at the Pickering Wharf Project. The building on the waterfront which will house the Victoria Station restaurant will need DRB approval within the next two weeks. Yw. Briggs advised the Board that there are awnings all through the project. '1he blue awn3mg for the theatre building is to be replaced. A sample of the awning sel-e-c—te(T for the building was presented for ap�roVa� coi®r sample #3013) . The Board was advised that aninterior sign system is being developed for the Lensire project, such as "Stop", "Do Not Enter", etc. and that they will keep the sy tem consistent throughout the entire project area. D1qB ACTION: Approved the awning color sample #10313 Respectfully submitted, Ethel C. Crowell I RLITIDV BO-'M MEETING _17iMES OF THE DESIG\ fELD FEB. 28, 1979 Page 3 The matter of the ventilation syster,.-.. w's discussed. Mi Burke was advised that 0 he would be allowed to bring the duct work throug:n the roof so that he will have his equipm ent inside the structure. The Board reviewed the sign locations. DRB ACTION: Approved the "Salem Fish Nhrkef'sign Approved a sign for the east elevation (to be submitted)%� Approved a "Take Out!' sign (lettering to be under two inches) Approved the enclosure pattern (rough board, herringbone pattern) Approved the interior installation of the duct work SRA ACTION: Approved Pickering Wharf - Victoria Station Site In order to accommodate the air conditioning equipment and a marina office, itwill be necessary to add to the existing building. The addition will extend out onto the open space since there is no other place to locate the addition. Me developer will maintain the five foot walkway. DRB ACTION: Approved Pickering Wharf - Building "G' -Q7 We A "Food Hall" is to be located on the ground floor of building "G'. jaD5.&N&- to be located on the Iggftop. No detailed description of the fan type was submitted. Iff �greetKat the Architect will have the opportunity to review a cut of the design and if it is not acceptable in appearance, it will be submitted to the DRB ,at its next meeting, March 14th. Changesin the entrances was proposed since the building was originally intended for multi-store use and is now going to be one total operation. DRB ACTION: Entrance changes approved. 0ther minor building changes approved. Respectfully submitted, Ethel C. Crowell �RNUIES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD MARCH 14, 1979 Page 3 PickerillS Wharf - Sipn manual The DRB reviewed the project sign manua 1 1. A question was raised as to why a plaque is needed for a Park/Square identification (C-1) and if it is needed, the Board would like to see a color sample and shop drat%ring. S-1 is to be resubmitted. All other signs are approved. In regard to the roof ventilator for Building "C', the Board advised the architect to keep the fans small. A change was noted on Building "A", where they are putting in a restaurant, a louver is to be installed. Louver design - approved New skylight design is to be submitted. Pasquanna Developers Inc. - Parcel RC-11B - Central St. Site Robert Scagliotti refrained from voting. The changes from the previous presentation included a new vehicle entrance, from Central Street. The walkway between the rear of the Front Street building and the.new proposed building will now become a total pedestrian way. Four new shops have been re-oriented to face this new pedestrian way. Additional stair locations and handicap ramps have been added to meet the ingress and egress requirements. Segmental arches, as -requested at the last DRB presentation was presented and accepted. It was recommended by the DRB that the arcade facing Derby Sq. be widened; look for ways to reduce or eliminate the passageway at the stairway on the south side of the building and orient the end StQre5 to the new pedestrian walkway. The stair way from the pedestrian walkway to the plaza level is to be studied. Study new connection between stairs and ramp adjacent to Holyoke Court. DRB ACTION: Approved with recommendations SRA ACTION: Approved IVENFIELD FRAI\E - Essex St. The owner presented the concept f0r a .1p-lgang s1gn which would be a palette 2 ft. by 3 ft. The Board approved the concept and requested a final design presentation to include a picture of the building, scaled drawing of the sign and all other requirements. DRB ACTION: Approved concept - requested resubmission SRA ACTION: No action necessary Union Street Garage David Jaquith The Board reviewed the drawings and requested a change in the cap of the building wall from concrete to copper cap. The DRB recommended lead coated copper. DRB ACTION: Approved Joshua Ward House - Staley McDermet The DRB approved the final drawings as submitted DRB ACTION: Approved SPA ACTION: Approvea Pickering Wharf A presentation was made on changes already accomplished on buildings L and A. Dormers were added. All disapproved as presented. It was noted that the DRB does not like to approve something that has already been completed. Building K - Added deck, space for kitchen and stair to second level. Approved r7l-��as esented. Tower - A redesign of the tower was presented. The Developer wishes to create office space in the tower and the architect has made an effort to make the tower an extension of the adjoining building. The DRB disapproved the design as presented and recommended further study and redesign to retain verticality of the tower. ation of the owner A special meeting will be held in two weeks (April 25) for the Bavarian Deli, Add Inc. and Wenfield Frame. Respectfully submitted, Helen Baldwin and Christopher G. Olney Redevelopment TELEPHONE 744-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 744-4580 MINUTES OF THE DESIG14 REVIEW BOARD MEETING - APRIL 25, 1979 The members of the Design Review Board met for a Special Meeting on Wednesday, April 25, 1979, with the following members present: Robert Scagliotti and Annie Harris. Absent: Norbert Florendo, Ronald Barnes, John Wright and Helen Baldwin. The members present reviewed the following proposals: P3_C ng=K�arf - Building "C" At the last DRB meeting the design change for the Tower in Building "C" was discussed. The Board asked that sketches, showing the new design, as well as alternative designs be submitted for review since the Tower Building is the a c s d A-n Isc g ' ar e la s s e f s t-D I m d ee n 1h 5� g 11 e des a k d th at a �Board bm._tted s a e n e d s be s :n ect 1 t t1v 0 ma entrance to the project. The DRB was advised t�hhat since the original proposal was :submitted, it has been decided that the developer would like to have office space in the Tower. it j th th t 3_ as never intended to open it up to the public. po The DRB was opposed to the horizontal band as opposed to the original sub- mission. The DRB ecomme I hich was sketched in by the architect. The DPB requeste a copy of the design, including the corner boards, be submitted for formal DRB ACTIO Approved pending receipt of a final drawing-- Buildj'_wg_�& The developer went ahead and built three dormers without submitting drawings ppro Z 'tor torma_L :App ved=pending rece S Cfora val by the Design Review Board. Page 2 MINUTES OF THE DRB MEETING HELD APRIL 25, 197� The reason was to condominimize t'ne ap'artments instead of renting them, which they felt was more economical. ISalem 5� Savings Bank personnel was not aware that it had to be presented to the DRB for approval and they apologized for doing the work without approval. R. Scagliotti noted that it is a design situation and it is becoming a top heavy building and its major concern is that this is a drastic change in.the design of the buildings. Reluctantly the Board approved the change in the building design for the dormers, just for the record. Mr. Leonard of the Salem 5 noted that they would like to come back to the DR3 for a review on the Marine Basin design. DPB ACTION: Tower design approved - Building "C.' Dormers approved - Buildings "A" & "L" Wenfield Frame - Essex Street Sign Works of Beverly presented a sketch of a palette, projecting sign, and the wrought iron bracket as the method of attachment. The sign will be a two sided sign. The DRB requested a sketch of the sign makers signature. DRB ACTION: Approved the sign as submitted Requested a sketch of the signature (before placing the sign) SRA ACTION: The next meeting of the Design Review Board will be held Wednesday, May 161-'1979. Respectfully submitted, Ethel C. Crowell MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING MAY 16, 1979 Page 2 HERITAGE PLAZA-WEST John Collins John Collins presented final drawings for site improvement work in Heritage Plaza-West. He noted that it is the intent of the plan to reorganize the parking area and not to reduce the number of parking spaces. The City has informed him to delay further design work on the Washington St./Essex St. corner lot and to put the funds into fixing up Washington St. It was noted that he has eliminated vertical curbing except for a small area of sloped curbing, new pedestrian lights are to be installed along the side of the Bank building up to Lynde St. The project will be bid with three alternates: parking for the "Y", the area next to Bowman's will be held up to see if a developer could be found,� and the Kerr parking area. DRB ACTION: Approved the.plan as submitted SRA ACTION, Washington St. - A landscaping plan was submitted for both sides of Washington St. which would include two areas of brick work along Washington St. (in front of City Hall and the Masonic Building) . DRB ACTION: Approved SRA ACTION: Approved Market Stalls - Mr. Burke Mr. Burke presented a plan for two market stalls nearest Front St. Mr. Burke planned to serve food over the counter and inside. The plans submitted were in- complete and a recommendation was made by the DRB relative to theinstallation of the enclosure which would better serve the proposed operation. Mr. Burke felt that he did not have enough time to prepare new plans for re- submission and that the plans had already been approved by the-Market Commission and the Health Dept. Mr. Burke felt that he had presented plans to enough Boards to review, and withdrew his request. Pickering Wharf - David Lash, Planning Dept. The Board was advised that Pickering Wharf had an egress problem in the building he B a d a d sed ha e a had an e re s prob I em in s: 0 -ns tall quIred t 3- e for t r cor a 3- :=orn he: e d T 0 r w s v- t t P c T rf closest to the National Park Service building and was required to install an exterior N stairwell by the Building Inspector's office. :L i t3.n 31nstallat i QRB:ACTION: The DRB:approved the existing installation, for the record. XES OF ITE DRB ICETING HELD AUG. 8, 1979 Page 4 It was proposed to restore the first level and take the middle building and,recess. between the other buildings and put P face 0.1 it. (Copy of preliminary write-up enclosed) Pickering Wharf - Tucker Shields Mr. Shields was advised by the DRB that it does not approve of the fenestration of the tower. The existing construction is not the same as what was approved by the Design Review Board at an earlier meeting. The Dn asking for a resubirtittal. for the tower construction so that they Pay be=1le to work together to come to a satisfactory design solution. :yJ -------------— Andr Imes, Planning Dept. Staff Architect, will bring the matter up for dis- cussion with the City Planner. A proposal for Building "IT (change in the dormer) east elevation, was presented for approval. Pickering Wharf is required to add a stairway as a second means of egress for the new tenant in the building. DRB AMON': Approved Respectfully submitted, Ethel C. Crowell all Redevelopment TELEPHONE 744-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 744-4580 MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEIV BOARD MEETING HELD AUGUST 22, 1979 The members of the Design Review Board met for a special meeting. Ronald Barnies and Helen Baldwin were present. The following proposals were reviewed: Pickering Wharf - Victoria Station, new mechanical room The architect advised the Board that they are having a serious problem with the air-conditioning in one particular section of the building which is located at the end of the duct line. The system is not able to take care of this section of the building. The only solution is to install an individual system and build a mechanical room. They will have to close off an existing doorway, and create an emergency egress. The mechanical -room will be painted to match the existing building and the flue pipe for the system will be copper to match the roof. DRB ACTION: Approved Metcom - Eric Rumpf Mr. Rumpf attended the meeting to present preliminary plans showing the pro- posed rehabilitation of the building located at the corner of New Derby and Lafayette St. it is proposed to remove the one story building facing the First National Store. The owner of the adjoining pr6peity is requiring the developer to install a fence between the properties. It was considered to create an arcade through the building but there is a .problem of elevation and it does not seem feasible. The proposed use for the upper floors would be office space only. Windows will have a center mullion 71 6" square, bronze anodize aluminum transoms, thermpane glass as opposed to the original industrial type windows. The top course will be painted to match the lighter concrete. The largest problem is the Lafayette Street section. It seems to be that the arches cannot support the weight. The whole Lafayette St. side will have to.be restudied in order to blend in with the New Derby St. side of the building. The panel and window treatment-did not receive DRB approval and recommended that the developer restudy this section and consider using brick rather than bronze panels between the windows. The DRB felt that this is a Very important section of the building. �UNUTES OF 'fflE DRB MEETING HELD SEPT. 12, Page 2 Warty Line - Washington St. - Mr. Bill Graffimi & Dan Mr. Graffwn was asked to come to the DRB meeting since he had signs placed on his store windows that do not conform to the sign regulations in the sip manual, and is inappropriate to the area. Mr. Grafam stated that he does not feel that the sign is inoffensive and it is conducive to his business. He stated that he cannot afford to replace the sign at this time The Superintendent for the Masonic Building noted that the Building Inspector's office advised him that he did not need a permit to replace a sign. After discussion is was found to be that the installation of the new sign was a total misunderstanding between the Superintendent and the Building Inspector's office. Mr. Graffum advised the Board that he is negotiating with Hallmark and if everything goes through, and he takes on the Hallmark line, then there is a possibility of changing the sign. It was agreed that the Board will wait three months, which is the tille needed to complete the negotiations with Hallmark. At the end of the.,-three months the matter will be reviewed by the DRB. DRB ACTION: Approved the temporary sign for three months SRA ACTION: No action necessary PICKERING WHARF Add Inc. Tucker Shields The Board was advised that Pickering Wharf has made changes as follows: Building C. - Door #14 The entrance doo r had to be recessed since by law they are not allowed to have a door swing out onto the sidewalk. Building E - window They changed the proposed greenhouse on the south elevation back to a window section. Building L west facade, Victoria Station In order to maintain a cleaning area out of public view they would like to add a 10' x 14' section to the compactor room on the west elevation to match the existing construction. ;,.T.N-Lj-JES OF IHE DPB MEETING HELD SEPT. 12, 1979 Page 3 Building C - skylights The Board approved the skylight windows as submitted. The Board discussed the manner in which all of these chances are being made prior to DRB approval. They are expecially concerned with the�tower treatment and the changes that were made which are not in accordance with the approved drawings. DRB AMON: Approved the chances with the following conditions: The Board noted that the Planning Dept. should be so advised of the condition. The Board approved the four Pickering ,Nharl changes noted above subject the carrectims on the tower..-as drawn and submitted by he Architect and approved by T- the DRB, and w-M'not allow these changes to take place unless the tower Constnic- The DRB requests an answer from Mike Moniz of the Salem Planning Dept-,' through the Salem Five Cents Savings Bank, as to what they intend.to do about this and, if necessary, the DRB will -refer the matter to the City Solicitor aria ask for a ruling, and; The DRB insists an enclosure be constructed around the air conditioning units that stand out in public view. At this time a copy of Add Inc. 's letter to ithe Sai-em-Five Cents Savings Bank was read relative to an addition to the deck on�Building "A". Add Inc. stated that they are opposed to any "porch-like" structure..' The DRB agreed with Add Inc. 's position on the proposed porch like addition and noted that the DRB would not approve such bL proposal. T&-tcom - Eric Rump W. Rumpf presented revised drawings in accordance with recommendations made at the last DRB meeting, (revised drawings dated Sept. 12, 1979) . Elevations for the south side (Dodge St.) were presented showing the windows being opened up, as recommended, where the elevator shaft is located. The glass will be tinted bronze. It was recommended that the doorway shown be centered. The door will be for a second means of egrees, steel with glass panels above. The DRB advised Mr. Rumpf that the mortar and bricks are to match the existing brick work. 77 PERIY _NT"� ' T APPRUED AS CONSIST[NT 1jjjTH PROPERTY L L H A i 1 2 9 T A N"O R70' RLHABIL11 Al 1041 STANDARDS: [PRELIMINARY;DATE, r of 1.P.I A.- FINAL;DATE_ 70—R H.P.E..P,.!.N.�MASS. 95 HILL N., SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS TENANT DESIGN CRITERIA 1 DEC. 1977 Heritage Trust II Salem, Massachusetts Wilder-Manley Associates , Inc . Boston, Massachusetts ADD Inc Cambridge, Massachusetts TENANT DESIGN CRITERIA PICKERING WHARF TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ii . CRITERIA CONCEPT III. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURE A. Design Submission B. Sign Submission C. Drawings , Specifications and Samples D. Design and Construction Procedure IV. TENANT LOCATIONS V. SIGNS A. General B. Sign Requirements C. Exterior Lights VI. DISPLAY REGULATIONS A. General B. Ground Level C. mezzanine, Second and Third Levels VII. TENANT DESIGN REGULATIONS A. Retail and Office Spaces B. Restaurants VIII . CHRISTMAS DECORATIONS A. Exterior B. Interior IX. APPLICABLE BUILDING CODES ADD Inc Architecture Design Development TENANT DESIGN CRITERIA PICKERING WHARF I. INTRODUCTION Pickering Wharf is a waterfront commercial , resi- dential and theatre development on a former oil company tank farm in Salem, Massachusetts that will be a ma3or attraction to tourists visiting the area as well as an active year round shopping and living community for resi- dents. Salem has already received national recognition for its restoration efforts along its main street, but this four and one half acre project will create the first opportunity for new waterside pedestrian/commercial ac- tivity in the city since the turn of the century. Pickering Wharf is located near the core of historic Salem, close to. the House of the Seven Gables and ad- jacent to the National Maritime Park. An assemblage of free standing gable and hip roof structures evocative in form, character, and materials of 18th and 19th century wharfside Salem, the project contains forty thousand square feet of shops, forty seven one and two bedroom loft dwellings, and two restaurants. Slips for forty boats will be provided for utilization by residents of the community. The entire project is keystoned by a twenty thousand square foot theatre facility housing a permenent multi- media production that will be both entertaining and edu- cational. This project is especially significant because it reuses an important piece of waterfront property the way it should be used. The mixed use combination of shopping and housing assure activity twenty four hours a day. Waterside access by visitors is assured by pro- vision of pathways along the edge of the wharf, and fur- ther encouraged by the operation of marina facilities. The scale of old Salem is respected and complimented by the design of new buildings , the open spaces, and the surface materials. The filling and enlivening of the spaces is ultim- ately dependent, so far as design is concerned, on the quality of the design, occupancy and function of the ten- ant spaces. Within the bounds of the basic architectural fabric of the buildings, tenants are allowed and encour- aged to express their individuality in the wide and diverse range of individual requirements. Pickering Wharf will achieve success through the variety and vitality created by the individual store designs allowed within this criteria. ADD Inc Architecture Design Development ML TENANT DESIGN CRITERIA PICKERING WHARF II. CRITERIA CONCEPT The concept of these criteria is to provide a wide range of choices to Pickering Wharf tenants. A series of Tenant options is available which permit a variety of expressions within a coordinated design framework. Tenants are encouraged to discuss specific thoughts or questions regarding this document with the administra- tors of the criteria prior to beginning design work. The Design Criteria must be used in conjunction with the Lease Drawings , the Schedules to the Lease and the Lease itself. In addition, Tenants are encouraged to review the Pickering Wharf construction contract drawings and specifications. Copies are available for review or reproduction at tenant expense. ADD Inc Architecture Design Development TENANT DESIGN CRITERIA PICKERING WHARF III. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURE A. Preliminary Meeting between Tenant and Owner B. Design Submission includes : 1. Plans, elevations , sections , and sketches at 1/8" or 1/4" = l ' -O" which fully describe the design. 2. Samples or cuts of equipment and fixtures. 3. Color, fabric, and carpet samples. 4 . Signage design. C. Construction Document Submission includes : 1. Complete scale drawings of plans , elevations , sections , and details adequate to submit to a professional contractor for construc on. 2 . Written specifications describing all equip- ment, fixtures, and finishes. 3 . Scale drawings and specifications of signs. D. Drawings and specifications must be submitted to the owner as follows : 1 . Three bound sets of black or blue line prints . 2 . Three bound sets of Specifications (if not drawings) submitted on 8 1/2" x 11" paper. E. Design and Construction Procedure: Tenants are to follow the schedule outlined on the following page. ADD Inc Architecture Design Development TENAN-T-- OWNER LEASE ISSUE: PREPARE: Lease Outline Drawing Design Submission Design Criteria including Design Plumbing HVAC Electrical if not approved Sign Submission Review Design "17- (one week minj Prepare Construction if not approved Document Submission Review Construction Documents (one week min.) FConstruction Release Obtain Building Permit tuty of Salem) Construction Period Obtain Occupancy Permit (City of Salem) OPEN DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURE TENANT DESIGN CRITERIA PICKERING WHARF IV. TENANT LOCATIONS A. The following pages contain plans of Pickering Wharf identifying Tenant spaces . ADD Inc Architecture Design Development Ly AD ARp so A ca cc co IS IS ic Go I. ITTFUT is NE CONGRESS STREET GROUND FlA)M PLAN PIC KFMNG WHAIRF 40' 0, LEASING PLAN SALEDL MASSACHUSETTS %MA JG W N CONGRESSSTREET SECOND PTA= PLAN PICKMNG WHARF LKASMG PL&N SALM%t all / lift I I jp It ' KEY IIIIMM CONGRESS STREET TU= FLOCR PLAN PICKERING WHARF LEASING PLAN SA=,MAS&ACHUSETTS C�OnMP M�Museds 02138 40" TENANT DESIGN CRITERIA PICKERING WHARF V. SIGNS A. General It is the intent of the graphic program to encourage fresh expressions of visual identity consistent with the contemporary spirit of 1977 yet respectful of the history of the area and foundations of the city of Salem. The graphic expression and the signage will be the visual story of the economics and the attitudes of our contempor- ary generation, and it is hoped, provide a reasonably flex- ible tradition for future merchants and designers to continue. These graphic standards set forth, for all Tenants , standards of usage for all communication needs , that are clear, simple functional and valid in contemporary visual terms . Tenants will be expected to avoid styles and man- nerisms that are arty, sentimental and second rate repro- ductions of "antique" signs. The results in terms of street atmosphere and visual design should be lively and of consis- tently high quality design and material. Tenants will be expected to do business under names that are reasonably straightforward, clear and honestly presented. Simple gen- eric names are encouraged. Mounted signs on the facades of buildings add visual interest as well as visible information. Such exterior mounted signs will be permitted when referring to actual Tenants, both retail and *office . These signs may include both firm names and types of merchandise or services pur- veyed. Tenants are allowed to have a maximum total sign area of: 1. Ground Floor - 1 sq. ft. per lin. ft. of building facade. 2. Second and Third Floors - 1/2 sq. ft. per lin. ft. of facade. B. Sign Requirements 1 . The Tenant may use signs of the approved categories as sholon on pages A, B, and C (Sign Types) , ADD Inc Architecture Design Development TENANT DESIGN CRITERIA PICKERING WHARF 17. SIGNS (continued) 2. The Tenant may provide one sign per floor per facade of the approved categories and locations . 3 . Type "a" signs must be made of wood or metal (painted) , letters may be painted, incised, or raised. Background colors are limited to black , grey, dark green, dark blue, brown, yellow ochre, deep red, or natural wood. Letter colors must be compatible and not clash or vibrate. Signs may be framed or with plain edge. Maximum vertical dimension is l ' -6" . The sign must correspond to and be contained within the length of the Tenant facade. Maximum letter size is 10" . Type "b" sign (applied letters) must be of wood (painted) , cast metal (painted) , real bronze or black ano- dized aluminum. mill finish or bronze aluminum or stainless steel or other white metal are not allowed. Colors are limited to those noted above. Maximum letter size is 10" . 4 . Other categories of signs allowed are brass or bronze plaques (type "c" ) and signs on glass or behind the storefront, (types "f" and "g" ) . The sign is to fill no more than .30% of the glass . 5. Projecting or object signs (types "d" and "e" ) , perpendicular to the facade on the first or sec- ond floor levels , may be used as one of the al- lowed signs , when specifically indicated, on the approved drawings . Projecting signs are to be no higher than 25 feet or the cornice line of the building, whichever is lower; furthermore, pro- jecting signs for ground floor Tenants may be no higher than the second floor window sill line. (Projecting signs over public streets will be required to be bonded by the City of Salem. ) 6 . Flag or banner (type "h" ) , of approved design, hung from second floor flag poles , may be used as one of the allowed Tenant signs . 7. Awnings , appropriately signed (type "i" ) with 8" maximum letter height, straight at the first or second floor, or round at the second floor (with 4" maximum- letter height) , may be used as one of the allowed Tenant signs . Awning must be Lateral ADD Inc Architecture Design Development TENANT DESIGN CRITERIA PICKERING WHARF V. SIGNS (continued) arm style as manufactured by Peterson Awning, Boston, or equal. Color and fabric must be submitted for approval. (Awnings over public streets will be required to be bonded by the City of Salem. ) 8 . Sale sign (type "j " ) is permitted in any exterior window for a maximum period of two weeks. Sale sign (type "k" ) is permitted in any display win- dow. 9 . The Tenant may not use coy, rustic or unnaturally antiquated names or use imitations of old English and other scripts or affectations of spelling. 10 . Each location in every building will have a specific address . Numbers will be prominently featured at each entrance in 3-inch high Clarendon Bold numbers painted on the door or transom above the door in white by Tenant (as shown on page E) . Tenants may incorporate building numbers into their other signage, in the style of the sign. 11. Paper signs shall not be used (except as allowed. under section 5B 8) . 12 . Signs shall not be internally lighted (except for neon.)__ 13 . Credit card or other stick-on signs are not per- mitted on any glass or other exterior portion of the structure. 14 . Store hours may be displayed on exterior glass with 1" white Helvetica letters as shown on drawing C. 15 . Restaurant Tenants with over 5 , 000 square feet of area are allowed to have one free-standing sign with an area on each face of not more than 16 square feet. This sign is to be no higher than 12 feet above the ground, and shall be located as directed by the owner. C. Exterior Lights 1. Tenants may install at their expense exterior lights , detailed and located to Pickering Wharf standards only. ADD Inc Architecture Design Development varies HARBOR TOY SHOP 11 co M E a APPLIED FLAT SIGN (PAINT, METAL, PLASTIC OR WOOD LETTERS) 10- LETTERS MAX. MARINE HARDWARE b A PPL I ED LETTERS 10� LETTERS MAX. light fixture rt7 171 36" 1 0 PLAQUES mat max T r d BRACKET SIGN A. SIGN TYPES cl) M E 4,V 12"1 36" mal max I 0 r I ETCHED OR PAINTED ON GLASS e OBJECT- SIGN 42" max x C'j M g NEON SIGN h FLAG OR BANNER Mooks i AWNING 8-LETTERS MAX. B . SIGN TYPES 0 ,A LM SALE SIGN - EXTERIOR ONLY; LIMITED TIME (CUT-OUT LETTERS ON GLASS) 24"max. x m S Q PLASTIC OR HARD- -a BOARD INSERTS (SLOT ONE END OF FRAME) FRAME FULL SIZE SALE SIGN (SUSPENDED) C . SIGN TYPES FLAG PAINT ED ON GLASS APPLIED LETTERS FLAT SIGN �(�PROJECTING OR OBJECT SIGN ANTIQUES' IBICYCEE 0 DART O,��—AWNING SJEC)� ------SALE SIGN 7NEON, ETCHED, OR PAINTED SIGN C_rmc=_r " STREET NUMBER D. SIGNS ON EXTERIOR FACADE L APPLIED L ETTERS TOY BIN NEON, C , ED, OR -y B-r)v o0y BACKPAINI ED SIGN SALES] N 7IND GLASS HOURS ON GLASS-17ERS) (1"WHITE VINYL LE HOURS M-TWFS 9m6 Q co Th 909 7 It E. SIGNS ON STORE FRONTS 3/4"PLYWOOD FRAME- A IR SPACE ----TIVOLI LIGHTS LIGHT BAFFLE REMOVEABLE -3/8" PLYWOOD PANELS HEAD STE I EL SUPPORT ANGLES --, \AIR SPACE SECTION SILL F. GRAPHICS PANEL / NEON SIGN BOX 3/4"PLYWOOD ON 2x2 FRAMEWORK �VENT HOLES AT 4"O.C. HINGE C14 c E DOOR L SPOTLIGHT TRACK DETAIL A SECTION G. WINDOW DISPLAY CASE 1 . PLANTER BOXES 2. POTTED PLANTS 3.TABLES & CHAIRS 4. PUSHCARTS 5. PORTABLE OBJECT & EXTERIOR DISPLAY DESIGN AND LOCATION MUST BE SPECIFICALLY APPROVED BY LANDLORD H. STREET FURNITURE TENANT DESIGN 'CRITERIA PICKERING WHARF VI. DISPLAY REGULATIONS A. General 1. Tenants are required to display merchandise in a tasteful , professional manner. The Owner reserves the right to have removed any display that he determines is detrimental to the ap- pearance of the building. In general, displays are to be held back from the glass and shall not significantly block the view into the building. B. Ground Level 1. All displays are to be held a minimum of one foot back from interior or exterior glass . 2. Merchandise is not allowed on window sills. 3. Under no circumstances is interior or exterior glass allowed to be painted over, blocked up, or obscured in any way. Storage items are not to be placed in front of any glass. 4 . The only window coverings allowed in any window are operable wood shutters , shades , levelor or riviera blinds, or drapes. No mylar filters of any type will be allowed. 5 . Fabric awnings on the exterior of the building are encouraged for sun control. C. Mezzanine # Second and Third Levels 1. All displays are to be held a minimum of one foot back from interior or exterior glass . 2. Merchandise is not allowed on- window sills . 3 . Interior or exterior glass is not allowed to be-painted over, blocked up, or obscured in anyway, except with either approved graphics panels or neon sign boxes or approved window display cases as detailed in this criteria. ADD Inc Architecture Design Deveiopment TENANT DESIGN CRITERIA PICKERING WHARF VI. DISPLAY REGULATIONS (continued) 4 . The only window coverings allowed in any window are operable wood shutters , shades , levelor or riviera blinds , or drapes . No mylar filters of any type will be allowed. 5 . Fabric awnings on the exterior of the building are encouraged for sun control. ADD Inc Architecture Design Development TENANT DESIGN CRITERIA PICKERING WHARF VII. TENANT DESIGN REGULATIONS A. Retail and Office Spaces 1. Floors may be: a. carpet - color and quality as approved by owner. b. wood floor C. quarry tile or ceramic tile d. brick or slate e. other similar natural materials 2 . Walls: a. walls are gypsum wall board and may be painted or may be covered with real wood paneling (fire treated) if acceptable to the Salem Building Dept. , or other approved material. 3. Ceiling:. a. Gypsum wall board ceiling may be painted where specifically approved in writing. b. An alternate ceiling such as wood plank, or wood strip (if approved) may be installed over the gypsum wall board. C . Fluorescent lights are not allowed. 4 . Lighting: a. Lighting fixtures may be incandescent track lights , recessed cans , surface cans , or other approved shaded fixtures . b. Lighting must not present a direct glare from within the store to the exterior. Ex- posed lights are permitted if shielded from the exterior. Display window lighting ADD Inc Architecture Design Development TENANT DESIGN CRITERIA PICKERING WHARF VII. TENANT DESIGN REGULATIONS (continued) at ceiling must be glare free , fully re- cessed incandescent wall washers or down- lights with multigroove baffle or black Alzak cone. 5. Mechanical : a. Electrical wiring for power distribution must be concealed in the walls. No ex- posed conduit will be permitted. b. Ductwork is to be exposed and painted or concealed above a GWB, wood or other ap- proved soffit. C. A sprinkler system is provided by the Owner. Sprinkler heads that must be moved due to the tenant design will be moved by the Owner at the expense of the tenant. d. Telephone service is available in the building. Lines run to individual shops must have location approved by the Owner. B. Restaurants (the following criteria are in addition to those stated in Retail and Office Spaces) 1. Furniture of contemporary design and high quality (Breuer, Saarinen, Aalto, Eames , Magistretti , etc. ) or authentic antiques is encouraged. 2. Kitchen hood, exhaust and louvers : a. Tenants must design and install an exhaust system over cooking equipment. The system must have a self-cleaning hot water wash integral in hood, 16 gauge welded steel duct within fire rated enclosure rising above the highest point of the roof, an appropriately sized fan in duct within tenant space with switch at hood, and a drain line at bottom of vertical stack. The exterior portion of the duct must be a round stainless steel stack with rain cap located where indicated on' the drawings . The entire system must meet appropriate building code standards and be approved, in writing, by ADD Inc Architecture Design Development TENANT DESIGN CRITERIA PICKERING WHARF VII. TENANT DESIGN REGULATIONS (continued) the Landlord. Entire system including approved roof penetrations will be at Tenant expense. Appropriate fire protection systems must be installed within equipment and working areas. b. Kitchen make-up air louvers may be installed in rear exterior walls and are to be wood or factory finished colored metal. Size, quan- tity, location, style and color must be spec- ifically approved, in writing, by the Landlord. 3 . Dumbwaiters: a. Dumbwaiters may be installed in accordance with appropriate code requirements. 4 . Trash rooms: a. A walk-in refrigerator of a minimum size of 8 ft. by 10 ft. is required to be in- stalled in each restaurant trash room for the storage of organic garbage and other bad-odored trash, and for the control of flies. Installation and maintenance of this refrigerator will be at tenant expense. ADD Inc Architecture Design Development TENANT DESIGN CRITERIA PICKERING WHARF VIII . CHRISTMAS DECORATIONS A. Exterior 1. Public spaces may be decorated with lights , wreaths, trees, and/or garland of natural materials , provided the decoration is exe- cuted in a consistent and professional manner throughout and provided it is done with the approval of all tenants or tenants organization and the Owner. 2. Christmas lights will be allowed around store windows only if they are strung in a manner that provides a consistent appear- ance from store to store, using similar equipment and colors . 3 . Wreaths and garland with or without lights may be displayed in windows. Only natural materials are permitted. 4 . Paper, tensil, plastic, or other artificial decorations are not permitted. B. Interior 1. The following are suggested for display in storefront windows : a. Live trees or seasonal flowers in pots , or natural wreaths and garland that has been fire treated to the satisfaction of the local fire department. b. Glass, wood, porcelain, or fabric ornaments. C. Stuffed animals or dolls. d. Fixed or animated miniature window scenes or creches . 2 . Paper, tinsil , plastic or other artificial dec- orations are not permitted. 40 ADD Inc Architecture Design Development T ENANT DESIGN CRITERIA P.JCKERING WHARF �X. APPLICABLEBUILDING CODES Latest editions of the following building codes are applicable to Tenant spaces . 1. The National Building Codes 2. Commonwealth of Massachusetts A. Building codes B. Electrical codes C. Plumbing codes D. Architectural Barrier Board Regulations 3. Salem Design Review Board 4. The Massachusetts .State Labor and Industry codes 5. Life-Safety code (NFPA) Bulletin No. 101 6. The National Electrical code 7. The Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 and 40 later revisions 8. Salem Sign ordinance Tenants have total responsibility for compliance with all applicable governing codes and ordinances for their occupancy types. ADD Inc kchitecture Design Development WEARY Salem, Massachusetts Heritage Trust, Developer ADD Inc Architects PICKERING WHARF SIGNS Project Directory Al - A3 Building Name Plaques B1 - B3M Park/Square Plaques Cl Marina Project Identification Sign Dl Information/Directional Sign Prototype El Marina Gangplank Sign Fl Regulatory Traffic Signs G1 Street Name Signs Kl Exterior (Street) Entrances Ll Individual Apartment Numbering Signs Ml Interior Building Directory N1 Parking Lot Sign Pi "Additional Parking" Sign - Congress Street Exit P2 Directional Sign to Parking P3 "Restaurant Parking Only" Sign Rl Historical Plaque Prototype Sl-R Project/Restaurant Identification Sign - Congress Street T1 IF E C D B 0 B G ------ D E H K K G C K B H J B A 11 um -mM p K T R 4GRESS STREET KEY TO PROJECT SIGNS A PRO-15-If-T 12IRS&IORY B ?�UILVIN(� NAMC 17L.AaUS6 C PARK/6,2LIAR15 FL-A4UE6 D - mAmmA P;zosr-cT 117MT15VATIOW 614M E -'AFAFTMSN*r Vj6AKl?4(4 ORLY' F -'PVKf-mMtj Wt4ARf 1AARINXIMAPINA (,AWIFLAWK 61CIN G - Vo Mo'f V-ATW H - "6-ro?%' I - -VONE WAY" J - ""AMVICARPF-12 12ARKW(j" K - 6TRF-ET NAMF, dIlCjN�, P - FARKINri 51CIN6 R -'Rr-STAURANT PARVJN4 ONLY" S - "11.57OR14AL PLAQUE T - V'P0Jr-(,-r/RF--6TAUKANT IVENTIFICAT)ON .61(,N GROUND 111A)OR PLAN: STORES 4N) PICKERING WHARF 46 so* too, LEASING PLAN SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 0 Q .IT ILI —3 Q, 5tz: Dr ate f 3 CL ULW Wt z Z, > ADD Inc Architecture Design Development FROJU-T VIKCCTOKS'�p L04ATIOW� 1158 Massachusetts Avenue E31i I Lp I N(1 '.6 Cambridge Massachusetts 02138 Al V14V,F,RlWei - WHARF Date IZ - 1 .76) Scale 0= it 1 01% WOY5 1 WTI! :t.)ALI(AN TOFI . OF W/ TOF OF VOOK TRIM 2)VIRF,6'VORY 0RIr-NTFt7 - 'W5-5T' UP 3)6r,r-- 1,AK4F- 66AL-F, � PXAWIN .(A4) rOK X2F--rAlLIN6j Or -3V-iw PLAQUF- ADD Inc Architecture Design Development VF,0.396*r I2lK54T0K'-( L.06ATION 1158 Massachusetts Avenue t�UILVIW4 0M Q Cambridge Massachusetts 02138 A2 ;21(,KEKlW4- WWAR5 Date 10 .1 .78 Scale 1/0 11-011 ,- 614iN rAa ��OL.-M-V + lro F,03T-� WITH ALUMINUM � OK 4AL. --MEL E50LT , NIJTj AW. WA!�HEK M,- AT Q� —AWMINUM A 4 MEL 514W rAl, -mA-rw. PIN5 TT r-a 17 1-011 11-011 r AT �>112F, I�LKVATIOW L�V JOK 013 12RAWINe, �A4) FOR Vt-WUN6 OF 614W U 6T EINATION ADD Inc Architecture Design Development FKrE 6TANPIW4 PROJ56-r 1158 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge Massachusetts 02138 A3 rIZ-KERIN6t -WHARF Date 01 -79 Scale V/o"� P-0" 1 11 6'. 1', 1 14 7 VEA e- r".kT�'I ., MYW'17 APPROX - LSW,11451 fix P� OF t3LP4. 7LA(2LJ A - B�AKK EMERALP V-zVZO . ' t9 - W"9F1KY KDW 130- P It r 50141211f4w R'- V12 w - wAvrwopwe ;2' -7yz" J -AKI�ELLA L - 4KANV TURK 2 -lip *'A'rTA(-tASV .'TO WINVOW.-TRIM :z MILLE �51EMI -.WLVp� TYPPSFA(-E rOK ALL MA115F,12 LETT SR6 W �A U6r- FLAXPEAV WOOV TO FM,'rF-N -1 6 1 ej N ro WA.L L ADD Inc Architecture Design Development IMJILXIN�; NAMV,- 'rLAQ1J5$ 1158 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge Massachusetts 02138 n6v'F-KiW4 . WNAAV Date I Z Scale A,� NOYEP -SVIN rAl5YSMFL7 YO IMIlk WMI !`�,Y VLAT"EXV W0017 :56KEW/ 65LTION A Norf, 02 A FLAQUE: 1� - FMATMR K - 45UTOO t2 j :4 lYOA,5K5RVlLLE VOR 4 ALL RA,16FV LSTTV_%6 4 -5URVALS MO'UVI*fEV 614M6 -:5PAI�L 13E "04� WALi_ 6URVAle AT ILI) Iro 9�it L. T14E 6ORWER PONY6 NVILATEV ADD Inc Architecture Design Development SUlL.VlW(, WA-HF, ?LAQUE6 1158 Massachusetts Avenue e6UKFA,'_t, MOUNTET TO IKVK WALO Cambridge Massachusetts 02138 [3 z Vl/,KMlW4 WPAXF -Date 1 .70 Scale A�5 NOTEP �n EAST SOUTH NORTH WEST V7LJIl.VIM4 4ENTMV-17 MTWSEN wINVOW-6 , IV4 LINE WMA T14E �W 4 4'0 ILAV 1,30ARV 40LI95el, A13,OVC YHC 6t4MEW417 AF 1625 I I i OAFS 62 SECOND FLOOR AE 1834 ---------- AC AD AA AB 942 1021 836 1034 GROUND FLOOR AVFROX, L04ATION OF -51tiVA A0,0VE. D3 A BUILDING A - J�U;Lviwe, 6A-fMt Qe4M LQ4A'lrI0f4 PICKERING WHARF IREUTAGE TR= SALEM, MASSACHUSE7M 04 EAST SOUTH 4A 99 A A A NORTH W E S!�T,/ 13UILVIN4 MAMV 6i(jVJ1 4ENTERF-t? 014 WINPDW A10,0V15, - LOWEV EV41E- OF :!51CIM 0" 00V5 TOF 5V41E OF WiN15AMV I Qp BB BIC VA �vr sWp 8 7 1�27 21�9 __j atJ. T1\ V0 c GROUND FLOOR AFFOX. L06ATION OF 610-jM APPVI� . BUILDING B M11WINe, NAME. -5104' ��TION 5 1 Ill 70 PICKERING WHARF =rrAGE TIUM SALEK blAfSACIMETTS rt 2 .Amu nl� NORTH WEST NORTH WEST j REE FE! EAST SOUTH V40TZ-. OUILVIN4 NAM5 614N 6EMTF-9EV 0 ON WiNVOW Ali3oVr IM LIME WITH CK rwe SRS � 4�`2" etAYBOARP 4OURF6 1259 476 AD-1 Tk� 614NIMMP 392 ,................. CN v 757 X CF 15 787 THIRD FLOOR CH' 741 Ilk oq- 10 AFVKCX. LOCATION OF ..f .. ............... 926 G SECOND FLOOR cp 728 9c 962 471 All :�-CE 836 kk GROUND FLOOR BUILDING C OUILVIN4 NAME 6VtM L04AYION PICKERIN Q— WIE)LARF TAIDE TRUW IRALEM. hLkElaACHUSETTO NORTH SOUTH EAST El WEST WOTE: VULVIN4 NAME 6 4rMTF-VFV elelrwerlm WIMPOW 4 t5t.124, "^" wKp5K IN LIMS wl*T�Ji lrwv_ 15M 4�— 61-ApooAKv eotm,�,r-6 &Voi�ll 1415- 6Iet40AlJV I T ' L DJ > 532 DH 4� . a - 1155 ' LOFT DG A 1.......... ............................ DE DF 920 770 SECOND FLOOR A\AYVKOX. I-OeXr(OM OF 414M TIN DD 1153 DA DB I DC 730 752 817 r GROUND FLOOR BUILDING D - WILVIN& NAME 6VM Loexno� PIC ERING WHARF JEEPrrAGE TRUUi' BAIEK blASSACHUSEXI'S EAST SOUTH NORTH WEST MOTF-� C111L.V444 MAMS 61eM L04A-MV AVVROV 11 FROM 64MMSM OF 6TAIlRWkf F-W&LO!)UVF- I IM LtMS Ql-M T145 '3%F 4 +M FULt. ZlkP0OAMV 4OU"F- 5SLOW r4F, "ANVKAII. CAV A17MOX. ttPl-PrION OF 6VqN MSOVS �EA 41. 1259 ....................... .......... IT OROUND FLOOR BUILDING E VUILVIt44 MAMf, 5149 LOZATIOM Iq a 1 9 n PICKERING WHARF ["HERITAGE TRUST SALEM. MASSACHUSETTS EAST SOUTH NORTH WEST NoTf : Pull-Vit4c, MAMe 61AN ISIN-MRW ON VZ70KWAY k,�,gLXW , IN LIME WIT14 YWE, SqP 4 4'�R FULL ZLAF- E'!,OAKV eouv,65-5 135"W THE ROOF TRIM FC upper SECOND FLOOR 1.0 t',e 1187 OF -514N AWVE6 s- i: %44 45 1317 GROUND FLOOR BUILDING F 131JlLt7)Me4 RAME 61eiN L06AYIOM N70 PICKERING WHARF 71M-Y--�W,, EMITAGE TRUST SALEK MASSACHUSETTS SOUTH EAST Tr NORTH K WEST MOTS', 0,UILVIN4, NAMS 61t4N 4FNTVXF-t7 014 WINVOW AV,4""� LIM WtT)4 TVM 30 4 +,w Zt-AVZbA"V'V7 eZUK-5F.6 Ali5OVE A.A. TMF- -51414?�AMV offla GK 6 2 2 947 .................... 5 JRU� L owf G i 700 THIRD FLOOR xf iaGE oFfaGF 788 1352 i2 ...................................... ......................... oFFaGH afad 788 678 SECOND FLOOR 6vM .7wGA 7. %oGB tHwGC 1321 -- - 1127 uzu GROUND FLOOR Ell -AuPGO 93L 12 BUILDING G p�UILV �- NAMF'. 61(,M I om PICKERING WHARF 0 s 0 n MAGE Traw &UZK MAMACHUBL-rM NORTH EAST SOUTH I flu; WEST E 1�,UILVIMCA NAMr- 6 CVmYC9r-V ON WINPOW ' M-LOW - 164CR sv4E op M4M 0- 15rLOW KO6Ff TRIM Ha -4 863 ........................ �HF 769 7z THIRD FLOOR AVrRoX. 1-04AY10M 4V 6lejV4 I& w4a d�� 754 �,HE . 06 V c-T 968 463 SECOND FLOOR I Ty I 161 HAI�HB H .- lo — 1431 GROUND FLOdR r 1�,� H BUILDING H FUILVIM4 NAME 614N LOIATION PICKERING WHARF MMrrAGE TY03T s&LM mAmACIMBErM !)lr7 r 11 1 1 Flz F EAST NORTH 9- WEST SOUTH NOTIE�'. ML121WI MAME, 61e,14 eEMTF_lkF_t7 5v_Twvy_m WINVOW�l, IN W4F, Wff" THE VtR 4 4'0' 4LA"OARV &QU96V-6 A00VE THF. tpleiM- ow I 0lANV � .JA 913 JB� 1104 �JF AV17KOV. L4/AYt0M OF 797 k/.614ki �,OOVZ ................. --77j= tt �JG Jc _7871 11 JD 917 IJ Aj JB 1104 JC j D 917 9 739 JE 801 JM 1142 Ij -GROUND FLOOR ................. JH 1107 606i 1102 110 SECOND FLOOR . ..... JN 1074 ip 1062 BUILDING J ENJILVIN4 ?JAMC -514N Ljn�ATIOM LOFT FLOOR q,76W a n PICKERING WHARF HERITAM TRUST SALEM. MASSACHUSEXI'S NOTE: D ILVIlNe, NAME 614M (ENTEEKev 0SYWVEtA WIMPOW�, - LOWC;k d* :3 ll� OF 61JN all Avlove —ff _rrolv FV4t�- $f �,14NOANO "MEF EAST NORTH ri SOUTH WEST 2 M-L A17PKOY. Loekno)4 Off 4,111M KC upper J=i�6330 KA 966 1008 SECOND FLOOR I Jdl GROUND FLOOR 4817 BUILDING K VVILVIN4 WAME 614M OtATIOM PICKERING WHARF HERITAGE TRUErr SALEM, biAMACHUSETTS n 7�j i�\' -7 T�_�. .f j_jf'l�jj M_ _ FT__l --m! M. 7 -Bm NORTH - EAST NORTH 0 13 El 1p� OV. i rn 0 13 4y ii Tilt SOUTH-EAST SOUTH NOTF- OUILVINC, MAPIS 614M &FIN'replEp OtywEsm WIMVOW-5,AN LIME WIT14 TWF, 3 B2 * 4-xl 6LA?tWAKV 4ouR6v5 E5uoW Tvr, 'WALL '71 WEST cl ........... R-A AWROY. L01, N ... ....................... 495 6KIN A 0 GROUND FLOOR BUILDING L 61JILVIML, NAM15 514H LOIATION ll 7+4) PICKERING WHARF TAGE TRUST BALEM. biASSACHUSETTS i-.PUILVPAC� NAHF- 614W 65Wr5M P- ON ARZ-H WAY -ow CMT ----�L�tVATIOW- e6OUTH rW ADD Inc Architecture Design Development DUI�121NL/4 M- - -L3LJlLPlW4 1158 Massachusetts Avenue NAME , -614M. — LOCAT1.0-N— Cambridge Massachusetts 02138 F21-6K5KlN4 -,- WHARF Date IZ - 1 -75 Scale !/0"- 1'-0" +1 eAl�PY LWONZS PLAQUE W/ RAI-5VV ,�HOOTW rAmq I-F_T-TE.FKZ2 � VVF.Vt�K ANV VMMI5. rlml/m iZYVK0UNV '�SQUTD) AJIXI_ ELEV. NOTE 1)' L�,A6KEAVILLE -SEMI-50LI?" 9) I_STT5K6 PORPeR Or FPLAOUe ?,Al6FV 6AMS Pr_lejW r A15OVE 5Ae-K- LAQUE W S V TO 41RANITF, 1?-A,�S 31 VE: FU�T 0-� ADD Inc Architecture Design Development 1158 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge Massachusetts 02138 I yt 06KEKIN4, WWAKV Date le - 70 Scale -3 IL h- ILI K 4N IL \Sse Z nzw ILI W\T IL_J y < ;z<3 ADD Inc Architecture Design Development MARINA VROJI�i�T_ 1158 Massachusetts Avenue , lPEWTlrl(-ATlOW Cambridge Massachusetts 02138 PT P16KFP\lN4 WHAKE Date IZ - 1 -70 Scale ?)-['�-79 will I NORTH EAS L�M FM M 49 "El WEST SOUTH w1wPow &"r7 P�r. or- J�,UIM44 W L11wrl W1114 1plt� 414w- V 10 JA 707 ;j 721 5414 lxy-A-rlow JD- BUILDING J laUILVIH4 WA-Mr, IWIN LZK-A11014 FEBRUARY 12, 1979 0 n PICKERING VTHARF XLrMlAwJM .LfW9r iAiiX MASSACKMETTS IL <C�- --7- 2:m 4� XAA V7 \-T Z3 ly z4 V_\A ;<:z :z\Y L),.4ZI D > VA Q5 :2 ADD Inc Architecture Design Development MARINA_-PROJE56T_ 1158 Massachusetts Avenue ]VEWTIF16ATIOW . 614H -_t5LV4. ' Cambridge Massachusetts 02138 F'16KF,RlN4 . WHARE Date 12 - 1 ,76 Scale_ !& 2 -211 PINE --�TRIM Apartment - �FAIWTFW ParkRpg OnRyL06ATIOM PINE TOM U" E�XT IPLYWV. NN -4RE:Y PETAIL A F;'0-5-r ' 6rl' IN 6OW A(,TUAL 51ZF- A P/2" ILOi, W APFLI�:6 -- TO "APARIVIFNT FARKIW� ONLY 61(-,W ONLY 1) LWXFVVILI,r�. -rYPr-FA6F- ;2) 61eN -rO T9 DOL-l"F-P TO F'0-5T \d[TP 4ALVANIZE12 6TF,51- 13OLT6, HUT6 4 WA6HER-:� AT POINT6 lNr2l(,ATE:V ADD Inc Architecture Design Development -1 W FORMATIDNAL /-I?l RE 6TI ONAL- 1158 Massachusetts Avenue 61(4W PROTOTYPI5.' Cambridge Massachusetts 02138 Date .1,2.. 1 .76 ---. ScaleA-6 NOTFW KV 17 141're 40 ALL FLAI�,EV L E T T e 9`2 woorr-n 61 IT14 pm6lw LF'.rYemp AMP OF gAe-4� OUT e L- U414 �5)-61eN MOUNYE-P 014 ejANeF71-AMK F-t4yKAN66 EN4LObUKF- WORIZONTAL 6rVAYFKLlNS- OF -N,;N 9 6" A'60VV- (-AAtM, ADD Inc Architecture Design Development MARINA 4AN4F7IANR 614M 1158 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge Massachusetts 02138 F I 1711,KSKI N(j - � WWAKIF Date Scale IVZ"-= 1'.0" \AJ%4 IT? K5V 4-"x*' TKV-ATeV. V[kP- 096T- - I�,OLTEV TO Vp -'P14N AT TWO 170INT!; WTe-6: L 1) ALL TRAFFIC -61414 PO!,T-5 7 7 ..,WALL 0155- -5F.T . IN WN4KET5 rOOTIN4�$---- VAT. -Or.- -tplejt,!!� �CIKA9r, -0 RA-ff- 94 0.9 614M VLAQUS� A�) V�V" ('ONE. -WAY0!I--- 5-� 41-oft 016TO176) . 4.) 4'-0" CPO NOT FENTLR*� 12.) W-01' ( PANV`1&AV?EV PAVXK,� - 1p)ALL TKA-VrFle. -514ALL 14AVe� A KlLnELTIVC 6UF.FA/-V- - ON TWF- PRIMARY FAe.E IXR VIE EM50�,')EV, :5TFF.L OR ALUMINUM FA,�YF-415-12 TO J'06T6 W/ 4ALVANIz5-v ALUMINUM ?4LT:$, 61515L 49R WA,5WCK,5 x F0151r - -614M AT 'TWO FOINY�, �WHITIE -5TFEL, 11-&PANNSI, ?V�,T rr -ro 6 WL V , leim Ay TWO ?0114Y�5 M11AARY SXVAt10KZ;1 -N179 5LUXTION6 ADD Inc Architecture Design Development —R`E�ULATION -.TRAFF14 � 614W6 1158 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge Massachusetts 02138 Date Scale VARIFE-6, -7 21 aZA";rr- :1VUN LAV Pth eTyr) 1�,LALK ]PH(CTTI T-D) HN((-=l eMT IRON -WA&Xr(�� ZA-5-17 ITZ09 �,1414 W/ WJT�41f PV 9411�15V � 'W-QOTP /,MPT IRON . Fulflp LETTERJ5 � I I W,�,T e AIP WRPNA1111 rrl5ftf I I I =– FIN16H 61�41ZOLIWV j4N 9 t-MT IRON— 9/0" EWLY 6LEF-VF- E- VIM /,-VT N 6f-6TIOW A 4� A 614N ELF-VAT10M POT AWHOKA45 FOP, ALL RAI-�V-V I-ST15Xi 2) ALL L9.TTEMN�-469'rfRF-V ON -514N -- FA6E 3) OMIT TOF �)VjN k 6VA(.9R WHEN ONLY -.- om.e '514M t6 ADD Inc Architecture Design Development /7TKV-ET NAME 614N6 1158 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge Massachusetts 02138 KI FVKERIN� . WMAXV Date .1?- - 1 70 Scale A15 MOTF-12 EIE] El E IfUILVINA 14A.Mf VLAi2UF, iL 4 OF ArA!�TMF-W'r.,.k RF-TAIL F-NT. ONLY E.LEVATIOR 7L� WHITE "I�)A,5VSKVILLr- 515MI- WLP-" -LVTT5KINej- VAINTE12 ON INTEKIOR 6119frA.6S.- OF 1G)c Dr. S.1. Lynn' 100A Thornas Pickering Co. 100Z K�--h Sale-m Realtors too C Marblehead Sail 100 D THE 91111.91W 6 V444 MAY Kr-aUIRE TPE 14E T"4WT OF TW16 LST. TEKIN4 CON E 15t.111,12IN46 ONL%�) -rO -BF, 6LIe,14TLY --6VIALLEV, T14AM INVI&ATEV ..--4;� -OF ALA6�)-, F'ANEI� -61PEL1414T LETTEKIN4 FQK ENTRAN6E -TO VF,6-n?F1JLE ;A".1 .e)il ADD Inc Architecture Design Development Exrmok 15-TREET) �M—TkAwa-6 1158 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge Massachusetts 02138 Ll VILKSRIM(4 - W14AXV Date I Z- 1 -76 Scale Ay� wTv2. OALK&iKouNv (FALF- '_61175�)� 'PPAINTEV R512 ze -4 tLEVATION_ `46 1). AL.L 64REWCP TO IVWFIIVI 6P'F_4TjVP_ . POOR 2).OL�IAIWEXVILLE LgY-rF-R6/�WHSRAL6 13) LETTERIN4 4FNYMEW ON 7,,-r AV'r. POOP, 5LEV. 6eA.S: YZ P�l ADD Inc Architecture Design Development INPIVIVUAL AVARTMENT 1158 Massachusetts Avenue NUMO)eKIN(l 61(jR5 Cambridge Massachusetts 02138 M I rl(,KF,RlW4 WHAM -Date_ I?_ .1 .70 Scale A/7 WO'rSV 7 REP 5UILVTW4 HAMS Nsrrm vix,,± "T.� wplyr- 5A4KeF.OUmV gawthorn- C j3uading' C Dr. 9.]. Lynn 22RA .Thomas Pickering Co. 221B Silemm Realtors 221C %r% Marblehead Sail 221D, Dinvers SLAt-K OYFICE NAM56 5LF,VATION l� '13,A6KSKVILLV 6t�111401-V" TYPEF44S . FOR ALL LETTEMN4 ?-) /214N MATERIALA?: ALKYW. 6TRW5 50AM TAVF, MOUNTEP To A 250" T1416K UN- r-KAME:V AZRYLI� WALL MOUMTEV PANFL - ( A/? MANUFA4TURE17 51� vommz, rtwt2u(,,T,�) ADD Inc Architecture Design Development -INTERIOR NIUVIN41 1158 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge Massachusetts 02138 Date 70 Scale A/> WVYF-P IM-6KmVILLE.' $15K-t-�OLV TYPEFACE- C REV —�OLP 4Rgy 4 .0 Z3 I�ASKERVILILX* TYP15FA&F, "T 6"-6TL. (OL.LJMW OF awm OF TRIM 14 I We VF-TA1 L A 1) 614N M566A(jE: FIAINTF.P ON �40 E:XT ACTUAL �>.IZC PLYWIP. W/ 'PIN15 TRIM 41201-11�1-F, - FA/-512 61ZlN --HETAL -:5-17KI-16TURAL T 'o J�AK rA4r6 FKA115WORK ATTAIHF-17 PF 1�OTH: FLYWOOP AW2 To- 6TF,5L "OLUMN6 ADD Inc Architecture Design Development rARKINel- LaT- � -514N 1158 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge Massachusetts 02138 P16KERIN4 WHARE: Date 12 - 1 -76 Scale IS\ NN 4 ?'IMF LO Ne/_Ano� (-Anom T6 — OF �WL ?/141, EXT , PLYWIP KKI Add0 � o PrIAL A , PAim Tr:.Lg ALTUAL .5175 SN RM 4!AwIl �TREATFV PIWE� FO�5T 65T IV M53A(,,r ELEVATIOW 1) IM61<f PZVILLr- -TYVEW_� 4614" TO [N�: 13,OLTF-P -ro P03T WITfl �AUVAW12F_l? 6TML, DoLT5, WUT5 WA5HrP,6 AT VOINT5 IN1216ATEP 3)6IL'jW -0 Or MOUW-rFV OH KF-VFK6F- , OF "K56TAURMT 12ARKIN4 ONLYI, ADD Inc Architecture Design Development "APPITIONAL 1158 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge Massachusetts 02138 P2 ;?I6K5XIWj . WHARr Date 1,2 . 1 , 76 Scale-A4 HO'rrV PANTE�P (J�F-y 2'- 0" -11,(Typ) LOLAMON OF WLT . 15XT. IPLYWIP. X Vx PETAL A 4"x+" -rrZr-AT5V IPIN5 A(-TUAL 6IZF- PAINTF-P ::'4� ME66A6� ELEVATION 1)1�A-5KERVILLX 5F-MI- 1301-1? TYPrFA6F- ?-)614N TO 1315- 0,01-TI5,12 TO P06T WITH 4ALVAWIZF�V 6Tr�E:L 1301-T:5) WUT-6 4 - WA6HER�> AT� VIONT3 WPI6ATFP --ro M HOUWTFI;2 ON RF-VFK6r- 6r �po HOT F-N-rr-R" 51(�w (vw el-14 ADD Inc Architecture Design Development PIKE:4TIONAL 610 TO 1158 Massachusetts Avenue RAKKIN(A Cambridge Massachusetts 02138 Pl(,MeRIN(4 - \dHARr Date Ij!-. 1 . 76- scale A,'; WMV III(Typ)-id TRIM M I _0 PAWEP RE12 ]FITE g . i��/l -LO(ATION Or 13OLT6 PINE TRIM PE-rAL A Ad& na -PAiwi,512 ACTUAL 6fZr 4RF-Y H565A-4FE rLEVATION 6ZAI-F,' I t/i" � V-0" 45111N 10 : 1�75 E�,Ot,-MV TO P06T WIT�+ 4ALVAWIZrV.- .-/)TF-5L. . FOLT6, NUT-5 4 WA61-IPZ-6 AT rOIWT6 INf2I&ATU7 ADD Inc Architecture Design Development URF,6TAURANT PARKIH4 OWLY" 1158 Massachusetts Avenue ��14N Cambridge Massachusetts 02138 V.I ;2I6KF,KIW4 . \&JHARF Date, 12 +70 .-ScaleA5 :-NOTF-12 Z-A-5T E3ROWZ5 FL.AQU5 W1 RA13EP 6MO01-H FA6FW L-15TTER6 + 1'�ORPFIK , ANP M[3PLF_ F1W1/;,H era r�ryp 1211+- Site of the Pickering Whad, CoIR Compzny R846 - M97 �IWQA Mr,6�AIE - -ON FIAIZJ15� 4- \--316w --ATTA6;Pr,V_ _T0 WALL -3LJPrA6r_ WITH )< AT. IFOI�J-17,5 5UVAT I ON !Z6TI ON 1) "f,�A-6K5XVILLE," TYPr-rALF- FOK ALL- KAI��P LrTTM!� T�WF 0) `��OAL 4/,L,)MPANY ?LAQUF 'l JN 2,p rOR t�?Lp'4. A - " f.2AKK FP15RALP" (P�Ale6 ADD Inc Architecture Design Development 1158 Massachusetts Avenue PROTOTYPE n�r_ W0TF_ 2� Cambridge Massachusetts 02138 F16K5KQ6 - WHAKr Date I Z- 1 - 76 Scale EAST SOUTH :k-� IT NORTH WEST AF 1625 :nH SECOND FLOOR 00 .1 Lit I Prrm, oF w5�; F-t-tv&Tlom I 1 r AE 1834 Al A�A AC AD AB L 1021 836 1034 942 GROUND FLOOR BUILDING A - H16TOR16AL PLAOLJ5 ' L06ATION .1-- 19 70 PICKERING WHARF H ITAGE TRUST SAIEM. MSSACHUSETTS REP 40L-V HIT ' -1WOOP15W PRDJF,6-r [.046 PLAQUr \A/ITP KA16512-1-15TTFK6 t�ORV15K61 -415 - ( K� K ROUNO 4�APMV t. IMA , I� L OUT---� LF-FT RM414)-- PAIWTr�--V 1--RA1615r' TRIM -W/ MIT�KW �-ORWF-K,� , F2AIwTW..--REv MAJOK� KF,6TAUKANT 6VIH �Z' VA61KW 0 In lly RF,�51-ok[J RANT PARKIN6 ONLY" Rcztaurant jP&TIkining On LFTTF-K,5 IN R15LIEF- rOR ALL L-F-TTEKINZ, ADD Inc Architecture Design Development 19KOJ56-rl P��TALJKAWT- IP5N- 1158 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge Massachusetts 02138 rI6KtWN4 - WHARF Date IZ- 1-7e, Scale W.-r. 1166 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge Massachusetts 02138 ADD Inc Architecture Design Development 617 661 0165 Philip M Briggs Wilson F Pollock Jr 1 August 1979 Mr. Robert Gallivan Wilder-Manley Associates , Inc. 66 Long Wharf Boston, MA 02110 Re: Pickering Wharf , Buiding Dear Bob: We have reviewed the architectural plans A-1 (27 July 1979), A-2 (25 July 1979) , A-3 (29 July 1979) and A-5 (25 July 1979) for Regina Pizzeria, Building M and have found them in con- formity with the Tenant Design Criteria Manual , with one exception. This office is opposed to the large neon sign on the west elevation of the bulding (see drawing A-5) . This sign is larger than the maximum- size we recommended for a sign in the center of this elevation (51x 5' - see sketch "Sign/ Awning Location" - 21 May 1979) . This office recommended the smaller sign because we do not wish to have the new neon sign extending over the lettering of the old concrete Hawthorne Garage Sign. Sincerely, R. Tucker Shields RTS : lc cc: Jeff Shaw Tom Leonard Peter Stuart aeVATIOH C-i&ti 5- AlrAQL F-N F-XIST11`101 . fsTONF, COVSf- AWN(N61 As. --5q0WW— W,�K\OAY5. �-46N R:yf 0 V7,V. �-46N ON NCKT,", ,)\�PN INC, AS 516N -5 f:OP, �!M Mj7F, -T -- - 5NAtM3 Pb c2HOWN ON H� -11 A 101. ki - MFA6+4 -KAT� 1516 N L Tl�NAN A<� %MR- ADD Inc Architecture Design Develc�pment 51ON/AWNING bOCAFION 1166 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge Massachusetts 02138 FT--&IWA FV-7-C--KIA Date Scale NoNf,� i 7' James Meek Kurtzman'and Kodims Architects,and Planners I .,I I . 81 ,Beach Road Belvederi, California 94920- 5 Septembers �IR79 v 4V Wilder- Manley 01, Leasing,Agents 4,r 6 Pickering Wbarf Salerno Ysssachtlsettz� 01970 0 A11antion., .'Ur.—Jeff Shaw i�l i4e. A.N Re .4 Victoria Statlon old A. .7, 1; �a�em, Massachusetts ,.New,blechaniiii Room Mr. Shaw. Dear On Tuesday, 28 August 1079, Mr,' Tucker 8blelds of Add,� Inc., I Mro,. Jack R�ed of Kenney Construction and myself held a meeting at Victoria Station In Salem to discuseltbe locati6a of li� now HVAC Mechanical iioova that Is'now under construction. It was agreed by all that the solution under con struction was the onli �osslble way to,solve the air conditioals Ail other g problem. alt4rnaUves proved Impossible due to lot k-a f S-P's a a above tboicifling or existinj basins and joists,that,are,blocking possibi I lities 'for duct runs. Also existing-sprinkler lines make duct ent:ry� f6m the rear of the building tzoposilble. —Completion 61AWHVAC'Neibaulial -i*iCwIUr6Ocur 06;FrIddy 1: jr, 1979. If any other problems or 17;10 Septembe Ise .1 will'be a On Ao discuss-them before Filday. 8 Incerely Mee ee JM,ro eel Mm . Tom Leoasrd� Salem Five Coats Savings Book Mr.4 Phil Briggs, Add. Inc 'Mr;'Tucker Shields, 4Addt -Inc. Mr.� 46ck 'Reed, Kenney Construction C�. Mr.- Bill Daylo Victoria Station I Mr. I Jerry Hendricks Victoria Station Jameq .3%1 o We'1ge V t Mr.. Hbn,ry Audesse, De rby Coristrubtion 7 ,IL A 'W 0, United States Department of the Interior 0 NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NORTH ATLANTIC REGION 15 STATE STREET IN REPLY REFER TO' BOSTON,MASSACHUSETTS 02109 October 9, 1979 Mr. Thomas P. McMullen Brandy's, Pickering Wharf Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Dear Mr. McMullen: Superintendent Byron Hazeltine informs me that a special use permit has been issued to the property owners, "Heritage 2 Trust", on October 5th, 1979. The permit provides for use of a strip of land 135-feet long by 1-foot wide to provide adequate room for egress form a second floor fire exit. X have asked Superintendent Hazeltine to contact you personally letting you know the condition of the permit. sincerely, Gilbert W. calhoun Acting Regional Director GWC:mc:1019179 1166 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge Massachusetts 02138 ADD Inc Architecture Design Development 617 661 0165 7 December 1979 Mr. Jeff Shaw Mr. Bob Gallivan Wilder-Manley Associates , Inc . Tancook Crescent Bldg. 9 Pickering Way Salem, MA 01970 RE: Pickering Wharf Dear Sirs: This office ,rejects the freestanding valet parking shelter designed for Victoria Station by James H. Ballou of Salem (drawings dated 10/27/79) . We reject this structure aesthetically and in principle for reasons previously stated in Phil Briggs ' letter to Tom Leonard of 30 August 1979. We do not feel the overbuilding of this site should be allowed to continue, particularly to the advantage of particular tenants. We trust those who condoned the addition to the Pub of Building A have not established an undesired precedent for such overbuilding. Following the meeting at your office this past Friday, Nov. 30th, I had the opportunity to walk the project and noted several new signs and awnings in place, a few of these previously rejected by this office. What do you intend to do about the growing number of unapproved signs and awnings? Your office certainly has had time to respond to our correspondence regarding these items (the most recent dated 22 October 1979) . Also, you might review my. memo of 13 September .1979 -which followed my September 12th meeting with the Salem Architecturzil Design Review Board. At this meeting, the Board accepted several. building changes with the conditions that 1) the tower.be built as approved by them and 2) the fences be installed around the air-conditioning condensing units. A few of these building changes have been completed and yet the tower remains unfinished and the condensing units not fenced. ADD Inc Architecture Design Development Mr. Jeff Shaw, Mr. Bob Gallivan 2 - 7 December 1979 I also had the opportunity on Friday to review the lettering on the Sunwheel Studios signage band. These letters are noticeably "plastic" and, therefore, are not in conformance with the Tenant Design Criteria Manual . I shall be away from the office for about a month beginning December 12th. Should you have need of someone at this office, please direct your inquiries to Catherine Knight . Sincerely, or"40% R. Tucker Shields cc : Phil Briggs, ADD Inc Paul Grant , Wilder-Manley Assoc. Catherine Knight , ADD Inc Tom Leonard, Salem Five Cents Savings Bank ./Salem Architectural Design Review Board RTS: jg William F. Quinn WILLIAM J. TINTI CITY OF SALEM, XR(0aXqTXxWx HDIF2003Mx CITY SOLICITOR ASSISTANT CITY SOLICITOR 70 WASHINGTON STREET MASSACHUSETTS SALEM, MA 01970 SALEM, MA 01970, 744-2172 April 8 , 1980 Mr . Robert Scagliotti , Chairman Design Review Board One Salem Green Salem, Massachusetts 01970 In re: Pickering Wharf Dear Mr . Scagliotti: A question has been raised as to whether or not Design Review Control is still in effect in relation to the Pickering Wharf Development project. On February 15 , 1980 , the City of Salem released its re- versionary interest inthe parcel. Nevertheless, the Assistant Building Inspector certified completion only as to the obliga- tions set forth in paragraph 6 , section A, B, C , D, and E of the Agreement between the City of Salem and the Heritage Trust dated January 1, 1976 . Item No. 8 of said Agreement states that; "all construction and site development, including improvements to the public area , shall be subject to the Design Review controls of the. Salem Redevelopment Authority as stated further in Appendix D. " Appendix D attached to the Agreement sets out the purpose, intent , powers and process for Design Review in the same manner that Design Review exists for buildings in the Urban Renewal project areas. Since the Design Review reversion on the utilization of this property is unlimited as to time , it would last in accordance with Massachusetts statute for a period of thirty (30) years. Mr. Robert Scagliotti , Chairman -2- April 8 , 1980 Therefore , it is my opinion that the Design Review Board in accordance with Appendix "D" of said Agreementstill has jurisdiction over design in said development. Since ly'r William IT /Tinti I City Soi,�Ltor WJT/dlg cc: Barry Plunkett, Esquire Thomas Leonard Michael Monaz CITY OF SALEM LAW DEPARTMENT 70 Washington Street SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 Mr . Robert Scagliotti, Chairman Design Review Control Board One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 THE RMEA1 SEAPORT MUSEUM THE-ADYAGE OF THIE UNDIN STAR, * THE LVDIN STAR TRAMVG COMP11INTY May 5, 1980 Mr. Robert Scagliotti Design Review Board One Salem Green Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Dear Mr. Scagliotti: -- After our recent meeting I have discussed the areas of concern that you suggested with the other members of Heritage Trust and all of the interested parties at Pickering Wharf for input into such matters. We would like now to go on record to your Board with the following answers to the issues raised. A. Dumpsters We are totally in agreement with you that the dumpsters as they currently exist on the site are unsightly and it is our intention to have all of them removed by the time construction is 100% completed which we expect will be within the next 60 days. B. Fencing Around Condensers We have enclosed a copy of a plan prepared by Add Incorporated which outlines the details of the enclosure and the screening for the units in question. It i s our intention to complete the work required on all units in question within the next 60 days. C. . Tower Construction It is our contention that the tower as it has been constructed does in fact conform to a plan approved by your Board after much consultation with Add Incorporated, the designer. If you would refer to a plan which I am certain that you have in your file dated May 1, 1979, and entitled Tower AC7, you will see that the only area not in compliance are the mullion strips on the third level of windows. We will accomplish this final step also within the next 60 days. Pickering Wharf/21 CongressStreet /Salem,MM01970/Telephone(617)745-8694 Mr. Robert Scagliotti May 5, 1980 D. Signs and Awnings It is our understanding that some of the signs and awnings currently existing on the property have not been approved by either the Design Review Board or Mr. Briggs representing Add Incorporated. We would welcome an opportunity to discuss with you those signs and awnings on the project that you find offensive. It however remains our opihion that there is very little in the way of signage or awnings on the site that does not lend itself to the kind of project that we feel both of us are trying to create for Salem. We would now commit that from this point forward any Pickering Wharf tenants needing signs or awnings will be instructed to submit their drawings to your Board for approval. If you feel it is necessary, we stand ready to meet with your Board at One Salem Green, or the Pickering site to discuss any or all of the above issues. Very truly yours, Robert Bramble Trustee RB/dgs Enclosure �?Vfr, jVr 4 Z— p� X+ jj�- ADD ln'c Architecture Design Development Nsr 4S 1158 Massachusetts Avenue #�Z, - --p Cambridge Massachusetts 02138 Ln.641e�- R57 Wflksf�-- Date ,Z7 e�cF 0 Scale I I Salem= Redevelopment TELEPHONE 744-6900 Authority ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 744-4580 TO: Michael Moniz FROM: Members of the Design Review Board DATE: July 17, 1980 The members of the Design Review Board made a field trip to the Pickering Wharf project site and the following comments were made: A. Brandy's - bracket sign is OK, hanging sign is OK, awning OK, window signs are to be removed as they are improper B. Papagallo - belt sign is OK, east and west sides awning OK C. Caniff's Men's Shop - belt sign OK Paul Marks - bracket sign OK Sun Wheel Studio OK D. Chadwick',s - OK D. Crabtree & Ev elyn - name plate on grass OK Pa-r-tridgE_SIToi 6 - plate sign OK �pp_ Stoned Elephant - plate sign OK E. East Coast Outfitters - name plate on grass OK free standing sign on wall OK G. Gallery - should remove sandwich board Sign is OK They have a dark blue sign on east and west elevations below sign listing occupants which should be removed because they have another sign saying the same thing. J. Flamingo - OK Bewitching Yarns - remove temporary sign K. H. I. Cottons sign OK Elizabeth Bell sign should be centered between three display windows or over entrance. Tower the DRB is still upset with the tower - it does not approve of the snap in muntins on second floor and intends to review the design drawings again to compare them with the way it was constructed. This is only a cursory review of the entire area and it is requested that M. Moniz do the same thing as the DRB did in their field trip. He should go through each building and list all violations. TO: Michael Moniz -2- July 17, 1980 It may be required that the DRB make another field trip since time ran out. The DRB will be happy to sign a letter noting the violations since they are con- tinuing to do things down there on their own. The DRB feels it is totally unfair that everybody must comply to design criteria and Pickering Wharf continues to go ahead without obtaining the required approvals. Robert Scagliotti Chairman, Design Review Board cc: William J.Tinti, Esq.