The URL can be used to link to this page

51-71 LAFAYETTE STREET- DERBY LOFTS 51-71 UfaYette Sueet Buflduig 0 sr 00 C-16 00 0.6 0 on C, C->O 0 0 Ion NOBLIN & ASSOCIATES L. L. C. CONSULTING ENGINEERS ONE WASHINGTON STREET SUITE 3050 DOVER, NEW HAMPSHIRE, 03820 PHONE (603) 740-9400 FAX (603) 740-9339 December 20,2012 Project#11 198NH Mr.Tom Daniel Economic Development Manager City of Salem Planning Dept. 120 Washington St,3rd Floor Salcm,MA 01970 RE: Derby Lofts Condominium Salem,Massachusetts Dear Mr. Daniel: The Derby Lofts Condominium is presently preparing to begin an exterior fagade repair project. Noblin & Associates has prepared the plans and specifications for this project,and is currently overseeing the work as the Association's technical representative. The scope of work for this project can be summarized as follows: I. Removal,flashing and reinstallation (or replacement if necessary) of the existing windows and doors above the first floor level of the building. Replacement windows will be aluminum framed units to aesthetically match the existing aluminum clad windows as closely as possible. This work is necessary to address improper flashing of the window and door openings which have contributed to water infiltration issues in the building. 2. Removal and replacement of the existing synthetic stucco system on the building with a new exterior stucco system with complete waterproofing underlayment and flashings. The replacement stucco system will aesthetically match the existing system as closely as possible. This work is necessary to address improper flashings in the existing synthetic stucco system which have contributed to water infiltration issues in the building. As noted above,the new materials incorporated into this project will be"in kind",to match the original materials as closely as possible,while upgrading the building systems to address previous installation deficiencies and meet the current building code requirements. Mr.Tom Daniel December 20,2012 City of Salem Planning Dept. Project#11 198NH Page#2 If you are in need of additional information,please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, Timothy D. Little, P.E. Senior Project Manager Cc: Michael Lutrzyowski,City of Salem Inspectional Services Rachel Campbell, Harvest Properties Paul McGovern,Bay Contracting Ralph Noblin,Noblin & Associates Salem Redevelopment Authority SALEM REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY DECISION 51-71 Lafayette Street (Derby Lofts)— Proposed Amendment to Final Design Plans DECISION: At their meeting on June 8, 2005, the Salem Redevelopment Authority voted to approve the DRB recommendation as submitted. RECOMMENDATION: At their meeting on MaY 25, 2005, the Design Review Board recommended approval of the amendment as submitted. PROPOSAL: The proposal includes the installation of fabric awnings along the first floor commercial spaces as submitted in plans dated May 19, 2005. The change also includes moving the clock from above the first floor, to above the second floor. 120 Washington Street - Salem, Massachusetts 01970 - (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 - Fax (978) 740-0404 Salem Redevelopment Authority DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RECOMMENDATION 51-71 Lafayette Street (Derby Lofts) — Amendment to the SRA approved Final Design Plans for the project at 51-71 Lafayette Street. RECOMMENDATION: At their meeting on May 26, 2004,the Design Review Board recommended approval of the proposal as submitted. PROPOSAL: The proposal includes the proposed material and color changes to the exterior of the Derby Lofts project. The proposed material change is for the upper floors and will be changed from Petrarch and Hardipanel to traditional stucco. In addition, the applicant is asking for approval on the proposed color selections for the various exterior materials. 120 Washington Street - Salem, Massachusetts 01970 - (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 - Fax (978) 740-0404 RL Salem Redevelopment Authority DESIGN REVIEW BOARD PROPOSAL 51-71 Lgfayette Stree (Derby Lofts) - Amendment to the SRA approved Final Design Plans for the project at 51-71 Lafayette Street. PROPOSAL: 'Me proposal includes proposed material and color changes to the exterior of the Derby Lofts project. The proposed material change is for the upper floors and will be changed from Petrarch and Hardipanel to traditional stucco. In addition, the applicant is asking for approval on the proposed color selections for the various exterior materials. 120 Washington Street - Salem, Massachusetts 01970 - (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 - Fax (978) 740-0404 +., � . j � I' , l � �� a�f E� � . � � � f( �,kl� ! i!t �, ,.� � 1 ��j ��f � i �� it �� 1�� lU �� I � f � f �J!� ��!��1�� E�� I� �ii; ii ' j 1 � �;4�, �f 1 ,, i?�I� .:fil��r��I��i�'}i��l ISI�}�I� � C i , ,� I.;,,�E� '=' �, W WINTER STREET ARCHITECTS, INC. 30 A;ril 2004 Salem Redevelopment Authority Attn:Tania Hartford 120 Washington Street Salem, Massachusetts 0 1970 Dear Committee Members The intent of this submittal on behalf of the Derby Lofts Condominiums project is twofold. First,we would like to present some exterior material alterations from the previously approved submittal. And second, we would like to review with you the various exterior material color selections for the project. The previous material palette included all of the same materials for the lower floors as are shown on the attached drawings. These are existing brick and new brick to match. existing concrete block and Arriscraft masonry to coordinate with it,white painted wood windows on the first floor(mostly existing) and aluminum clad wood windows on the upper floors, The proposed material change is for the upper floors and includes the areas marked as 3 and 4 on the attached drawings. We had previously submitted Petrarch(a parielized synthetic stone)for the areas closer to the street and Hardipanel(a painted cementitious panel system)for the areas recessed from the street. This submittal shows a traditional stucco system in both of these areas, a three-layer system on metal lathe. The change is based primarily on the limitations of the proposed materials that were discovered during the Construction Document phase. First,as we reviewed the material properties and the attachment system of the Hardipanel with a technical consultant we determined that it would not be suitable for the upper floors of the building in this coastal condition, Second,the Petrarch system,while technically appropriate, has color and texture limitations that could not be reconciled with the existing building materials without using custom colors and high-end textures that the project budget could not support. We feel that the proposed stucco system solves both of these problems in its flexibility of finish and color and in its durability. In addition to this material change, we are submitting proposed color selections for the various exterior materials. These colors relate to three existing material conditions: the existing brick at the first and second floors of the South Building,the section of existing concrete block on the North Building that is to remain, and the existing white painted wood windows at the street level. The areas of new brick will match the existing in color and texture. The Artiscraft color selection presented here coordinates with the existing concrete block and will be shaped to match the profile of the block it is replacing. The stucco colors are in the same color range as the block with the varying values accentuating the varying depths of the fagade. We look forward to discussing these finishes with the SRA in person and we will bring material samples to the meeting. Yours, Kelly W. Foster,AIA Winter Street Architects, Inc. 209 ESSEX STREET,SUITE 300 SAILEM.MASSACHUSETTS 01970 PHONE 978 744 7379 FAX 978 741 0240 .WVSA'ChiIeCIS Co� Exterior Materials Keynote Designations Exist,Oda t.R.�Wh <21' N—Bta 3 Layer fis�Fin"an Metal 1-atfia,Caar I -Pte—��App.�as pava�S"wi.su,�. 3 Lapr 31�Firsh�Metal Lassr,�br 2 71. -Prs�ia,y appro�d as PaNsd Haia�Paiwd o I> Aracraft-C.U.Slikude Unit Masa� I N.Cast atca�. C..Sud-(too, Derby Street Z <F> 0 MIND I - w I> RAUL F. w w ul z Lafayette Street § Derby Lofts Salem, Massachusefts z Li k A, Upper Floor Windows Ll 7.. 5 3 Ld First Floor Windows W UI J z Derby Lofts Salem, Massachusetts FMI , 11-0 -7 0 ------ pip FM PlIR �A- III A�, 1 12-1 U -77 Ij Derby Loft Condominiums n17N47R.I ITREE�. IN Z. . 1 Fri 11 ;— ai ia� IU LEI IEF: IM I a 'ILLA 1 .1 --Ij UT 5i j7 h, t is 3 Derby Lofts CondomInIums T =j Derby Lofts,L.L.C. WIN�R STRE� ARCHITECTS, INC. 51-11 WNWIC S�t.�.�b ...... ---------------- 0 0 1 R Mild-- M—MI-0 -------------- ------------ M It �jt - HH-ftucD. ------- to ------------- 7 txr. JTP nPFP F-[R,- FPPL FRo 0 ------------- - - ---------------- F1 T-P fit _Y L L "TNEO East Fievotion Exterior MOter,ols Key,,Ote DeS,gnOtiOnS I,--_-7 ..... Key Plan Z�, 4� A4.2 LLJ j H It Ll M Deft Loft Condominiums Derby Loft,L.L.C. WINTER STREET ARCHITE_ INI. LI ca ---------- -W---------------- ------------- ----------- -------------- ------- ----- - ------ --- ---- - ---------- -- ---- -------- --------------- Zli MID- L A.—I ---------- - ------------------- - 0 Z� throgh North Devotion Parlictf Easi Devofibll Exterior Materials K.,r.ti, O's t i .. Key Plan O�L4m4 m 7 /07- k�-r T" SM Derby Lofts Condominiums Deity Lotts,LLC. WINTER STREET ARCHITECTS. INIC. NEW PRECAST PANEL WITH SURFACE MOUNTED CLOCK FACE EXISTING PRECAST BANDING TO REMAIN DaSTING CORNICEI, Z'55.50' TT— EXISTING PRECAST BANDING TO REMAIN CAST IRON DIAL FASTENED DIRECTLY TO NEW PRECAST PANEL ENLARGED ELEVATION �F �ONE TM. iv� NEW PRECAST PANEL WITH SURFACE MOUNTED w CLOCK FACE ILLUMINATED H... CIRK > ... FACE SUWAQE WUNM PROFILE OF EXISTING M�y To NEW ME� EMWNG BR" PANEL MD CORNICE 70 BE CORNICE BEYOND Vmd Mo rd Floor w w I IL —1 ILLUMINATED HANDS—/ CAST IRON DIAL L SECTION WAM?.1.4r NOT TO SCALE DERBY LOFTS Salem, Massachusetts Step I Step 2 Step 3 s w b re, Select style from the Select awning width to change number of segments. Preview in 3D and swatch menu. Click on a segment to replace or flip it. print your design. Step 3 Preview in 3D and print your design (set onrit to landscape mode for best results) click to return to design mode Reptay Introduction Start New Design I Preview in 3D Print Design 4851 -Coastal-Spa 4851 -Coaslal-Spa j Glen Raven Custom Fabrics,LLC 1831 North Park Avenue Glen Raven,NC USA 27217-1100 PH: 1 336,227.6211 We have made an effort to provide fabric images that closely represent the fabric colors.However,due to all the FAX:1�336.226,8133 possible variants—light sounce,monitor quality,etc.—we can not guarantee that the abric images accurately represent the true fabric colors.Please take this into consideration if you are trying to color match materials. Salem Redevelopment Authority DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RECOMMENDATION 51 LaLayette Street (Derby Lofts) —Proposed Signage RECOMMENDATION: At their meeting on July 25, 2005, the Design Review Board recommended approval of the proposed signage as revised. PROPOSAL: The proposal includes the installation wall signage at the Derby Lofts Development that will be cast bronze with white bronze patina with engraved dark patina text at the following locations: one (1) wall sign at the exterior residential entrances identifying the building; three (3) wall signs mounted on the exterior entrance and exit gates cautioning pedestrians; and one (1) wall sign at management entrance. The proposal also includes eight (8) hanging signs at die retail store locations that win be 2'-3" x 3'-l" painted MDF signage on an open painted galvanized steel frame and mounting back plate. All are in accordance with the plans submitted by Winter Street Architects, Inc. dated July 15, 2005. NOTE: Each retailer will be required to come before die SRA/DRB for approval on the sign content prior to installation. j 120 Washington Street - Salem, Massachusetts 01970 - (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 - Fax (978) 740-0404 ,kLw Salem Redevelopment Authority MEMORANDUM TO: Members of the Salem Redevelopment Authority FROM: Tania Hartford, Economic Development Plannep--'K SUBJECT: Derby Lofts— Caution Signs DATE: September 8, 2005 Attached please find information the revised plans for the "Caution" signs being installed at the Derby Lofts development. The project manager lowered the signs, as recommended by the SR-A, so that they are 5 feet from the ground and visible by pedestrians. He will be in attendance at the meeting on September 14 to answer any questions regarding these changes. Pleasc feel free to contact me at (978) 745-9595 x31l or thartford Qasalem.com should you haN c aii.N qLICStions or concerns regarding this project. 120 Washington Street - Salem, Massachusetts 01970 - (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 - Fax (978) 740-0404 V-2" Cost Bronze— w/White Bronze Patina Cost Bronze— w/White Bronze Patina CAUTIONI" Engraved Dark Patina Text Font: Vercono CARS EXITIING Beveted Edges (typ) Wall Sign Mounted on Exterior at Exit Gates- Pedestrian Caution E (Note: This design has not changed since 2 Sign Type B previous DRB and SRA review.) Sign '13' mounted at 5'-0" above grade At vehicular exit: B Flashing warning light with alarm mounted F-Y on building ct 11 '-0" above sidewalk Q) 'Q) Z �6 CD U) Ll Ll F_ W W En W Derby Street Z Exterior Signage Location Plan Derby Lofts Salem, Massachusetts Salem Redevelopment Authority DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RECOMMENDATION 51 Lafayette Street (Derby Lo"s — Proposed Signage RECOMMENDATION: At their meeting on July 25,2005, the Design Review Board recommended approval of the proposed signage as revised. PROPOSAL: The proposal includes die installation wall signage at the Derby Lofts Development that will he cast bronze with white bronze patina with engraved dark patina text at the following locations: one (1) wall sign at the exterior residential entrances identifying the building; three (3) wall signs mounted on the exterior entrance and exit gates cautioning pedestrians; and one (1) wall sign at management entrance. The proposal also includes eight (8) hanging signs at the retail store locations that will be 2'-3" x 3'-1" painted MDF signage on an open painted galvanized steel frame and mounting back plate. AD are in accordance with the plans submitted by Winter Street Architects, Inc. dated July 15, 2005. NOTE: Each retailer will be required to come before the SRA/DRB for approval on the sign content prior to installation. 120 Washington Street - Salem, Massachusetts 01970 - (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 - Fax (978) 740-0404 — — — — — — — — — Second FJoK w-4 Open painted galvanized steel frame Open painted galvanized Open a d in"efing Painted Galvanized baCkpi.ta Steel Frame & steel frame and mounting backplate. Backplate Mounted Pamlo IADF to Exterior Wall Painted MDF Signage ignage ®r Z T-I Gm.nd Leie] ——————— ITLE v_ [)eNal Elevation ofBiade Sig 3 ei��0 Blade Sign J�gbw of Blade Sign U w LI w w M z 5 EnIferfad Voev of Blade Si n 2 De�y_qfjaet BeadeSgrtage 3D perspectival 1�25 11 2 V-0" Derby Lofts 51 Lafayette Street Salem, MA Derby Street Building Frontage Total Allowable Signage Area: 142'-5" SF Wall Projection Signage Total: 22.3 SF Wall Mounted Signoge Total: 0 Total: 22.3 SF Lafayette Street Building Frontage Total Allowable Signage Area: 154'-9" SF Wall Projection Signage Totai: 14.9 SF Wall Mounted Signage Total: 3.1 SF Total: 18.0 SF Q) CO co Central Street Building Frontage Total Allowable Signage Area: 153'-2" SF CD Wall Projection Signage Totol: 14.9 SF an C� Wall Mounted Signage Total: 1,7 SF Total: 16.6 SF U) (D z in U bi U 0 LJ Ld Ld D D 1 42'-5"± z Exterior Sign-age Location Plan Derby Street Derby Lofts Salem, Massachusetts J Cost Bronze— w/White Bronze Patina Cost Bronze— w/White Bronze Patina CAUTION I" Engraved Dark Patina Text 1j" Engraved Dark Patina Text Font: Verdono Font: Verdono —11 —10-4 M CARS EXITINJIG �Cost Bronze — w/ White Bronze Patina �Beveled Edges (typ) Cost Bronze — w/ White Bronze Patina DERBY LOFTSWall Sign Mounted on Exterior Entrance & Exit Gates - Pedestrian Caution Beveled Edges (typ) Sign Type B IT51 �1" Engraved Dark Patina Text Cost Bronze — wl White Bronze Patina Font: Verdanc LAFAYETTE STREET Cost Bronze — w/ White Bronze Patina ANRCG 1" Engraved Dark Patina Text Font: Verdono DEVELOPMENT —1 —ICN Ji Wall Sign at Exterior Residential Entrances Beveled Edges (typ) Ll Sign Type A Wall Sign at Management Entrance -ier to Signage Plan for Locations Sign Type C w Z Signage Types & Details Derby Lofts Salem, Massachusetts J> -t f L 1 40 TY0 * f W WINTER STREET ARCHITECTS, INC. I T i 7 30 April 2004 Salem Redevelopment Authority Attn: Tarila Hartford 120 Washington Street Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Dear Committee Members The intent of this submittal on behalf of the Derby Lofts Condominiums project is twofold First,we would like to present some exterior material alterations from the previously approved submittal, And second, we would like to review with you the various exterior material color selections for the project The previous material palette included all of the same materials for the lower floors as are snown on the allached drawings. These are existing brick and new brick to match. existing concrete block and Arriscraft masonry to coordinate with it,white painted wood windows on the first floor(mostly exisfing) and aluminum clad wood windows on the upper floors. The proposed material change is for the upper floors and includes the areas marked as 3 and 4 on the attached drawings. We had previously submitted Petrarch (a parielized synthetic stone)for the areas closer to the street and Hardipanel (a painted cementitious panel system)for the areas recessed from the street, This submittal shows a traditional stucco system in both of these areas. a three-layer system on metal lathe. The change is based primarily on the limitations of the proposed materials that were discovered during the Construction Document phase. First, as we reviewed the material properties and the attachment system of the Hardipariel with a technical consultant we determined that it would not be suitable for the upper floors of the building in this coastal condition. Second, the Petrarch system,while technically appropriate, has color and texture limitations that could not be reconciled with the existing building materials without using custom colors and high-end textures that the project budget could not support. We feel that the proposed stucco system solves both of these problems in its flexibility of finish and color and in its durability. In addition to this material change, we are submitting proposed color selections for the various exterior materials. These colors relate to three existing material conditions: the existing brick at the f rst and second floors of the South Building, the section of existing concrete block on the North Building that is to remain, and the existing white painted wood windows at the street level. The areas of new brick will match the existing in color and texture. The Arnscraft color selection presented here coordinates vith the existing concrete block and will be shaped to match the profile of the block it is replacing. The stucco colors are in the same color range as the block with the varying values accentuating the varying depths of the fagaide. We look forward to discussing these finishes with the SRA in person and we will bring material samples to the meeting. Yours '�O Kelly W. Foster,AIA Winter Street Architects, Inc. '�'� '_ k , N! '.'A- i'- u z U) E- --- - ------- --- E- -FIR I Ru I I H n F7 A r—Tr--1 FF7 w L-j� RI I nF1 HPPfi III I F1 I A 11--) u 1. F 11 J11 H UP -1� R-1 - FIF11-11 ..E ILI r 0 ILI _j ITT e E �1 West Elevation Southwest Elevation Scale 1/8' V-10' Cm LU LL 0 LU > LU cl 0 OL uj �KA -A?Ffoved TlAv, �12o) Kev Plan a 4' 0 16 A4.0 U U) L) u rip - I L L 77 7, 14 O (A. oj E 0 0 j _j South Elevation rm Em Em LLI 16 0 LU LU cl I OL LU 0 4 9 16 0 A4.1 Key Plan 6=mmll� U3 1H Rri HHHn ri ' - n I EL-1 LJ3 U W —Tr— FFH HIE LE 11 1 E-3EJH I - Ll F-1 FUTI 7M—FT T 0 I L Ll 0 E I Ir 0 0 East Elevotion z LU CL 0 -j LLJ > LU z 0 OL LU 0 4' 9 16 0 A4.2 Key Plan L; u U E. LLLF—j FIFIF L—LJL-j LJLJL—i C 7 Tr---FF—Fl 0 r 0 oo � 4) (D North Elevation Sccle: 1/8* T'-D" 22 m EM EM z ul 4(�) CO cn IL 16 S 0 . . . . . LLJ > . . . . . LLJ 0 z z L 0 4' a' 16 A4.3 U, Key Plan == Ilk JIM 11A It Jill E N Derby Lofts Condominiums Derby Lofts, L. L. C. El 51 -71 Lafayette Street P4 Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Schedule of Drawings: Architectural AO Cover Sheet D1.0 First & Second Floor Demolition Plan D1.1 Third & Fourth Floor Demolition Plan A1.1 First Floor Plan A1.2 Second Floor Plan A1.3 Third Floor Plan A1.4 Fourth Floor Plan A1.5 Fifth Floor Plan E A1.6 Sixth Floor Plan A2.0 West Elevation A2.1 South Elevation E 2 0 A2.2 East Elevation A2.3 North Elevation 0 E A3.0 Building Sections A3.1 Building Sections A4.0 Window Types 0 0 (D Q) a Q Q a 4 LLI - - --- - - - - - -- - ---- - - - - -- - - - - - U) Architect: Civil Engineer: Mechanical, Electrical Structural Engineer: Owner: Winter Street Architects, Inc. Patrowicz Land Development Engineering PlurnbiLn Engineer: Structures North Derby Lofts, L.L.C. 60 Washington Street TKG East, 60 Washington Street 209 Essex Street; Suite 300; 843 Massachusetts Avenue Salem, MA 01970 Salem, MA 01970 700 Massachusetts Ave. Salem, MA 01970 Cambridge, MA 02139 < (978) 745-2288 Cambridge, MA 02139 (978) 745-6817 (978) 744-7379 (617) 491-8315 LU (617) 331-8714 Cn AO General Demolition Notes 2. o 3. 4 R 4 It*4 vi E- E- E" M rj o �W Lo W E� E- ;3Tt' -M&I 2 JE- . %11........... ............... "zf......... ............. ............. —Z�--——------ gp "00 6 0 c 0 S�w 8—�. ft- 0 0 0 >1 >1 it it it .0 .0 C L Q a It Ikir, dp p p t; it lj 0 I it & ----------- ------------ ......... First Floor Demolition Plan Second Floor Demolition Plan L scale: 1/18' = 1'-0* Scal. 1/16, 1'-0" I D1 .0 General Demolition Notes I. 2. 3. 4. R='d,=�uw L) PQ E. o kr E�SW� E, V --- -- IF I X� TMNI-Ie- - l" -1 IgIr"l- =31 "nTr 0 14 .............. c 0 40 -j L% All, r W U) 0 0 if I -0 -0 ray-,— rL—:15 H 1: Z3 4 Third Floor Demolition Plan Fourth Floor Demolition Plan S.al. 1/16"- 1'--0' SwIff.. 1/16,= V-O* 16 D1 .1 Stair B to U n RETAIL RETAIL 04 -IL!,628 Sf pa z z Drive rough Area 2,351 1 ---------- C) vulloligUorTlIll ri;;-a E I GrW Flffi�:: .3 1 3,785 sf 2 OBBY al E*y — Z m E e-EvAToR 0 MACHNE 6 ST Stai 0 U) U) CO STORAGE MECHMICAL TRASH STORAGE RETAIL Oom AND REWVAL V V 654 sf j 0 0 -j -j A ENGINE HOUS PIZZA RETAIL 2,003 sf 5,797 sf LLJ U) 1:10 :mm'' smillmr: 4- LLI First Floc 1:1 1�2scole I/B. -0' U) LA1 .1 Flrst�Flo.r �t'.'l Arm 20.415 ..0 Stalr8 z E, Unit M ff L) rA it 10 z 1,56 rA .JE- Z 3 .137 W T.lWh. 0 E-1 0 Ught 0 weu 0 Wit 2(ill IL C EJ r�� E 0 Stair 0 g T.llwlrowp�L tt 0 o El L3 06 - - A + 1.4n W T. Unit M? LU U) T. 1.517 V z 0 El 0 El a_ ADOO 4- LU Second 1 Floor Plan M: 00 ir ;a u scale: 1/8' 1'-G* A1 .2 Second nool TOW Arm 20,132 a.f. ED Stair 8 E-I E. Li 01 0 3 ED r."Z. It M2 .",Vz� I c L13 01 Light well 0 L 1,624 V wt E 0 c stal 0 g T B1.1 J (1) U) a 0 10 8 --- Ljo "`7 ------ A t 1.4"V T.� UMt M7 LU IR,ft Ica 1.517 W -T�ll� 0 Igia" T- C) 000 < Third Floor Plan 0 \LY Scale: 1/8' 0 4' ff IF Third FlOOr total Area: 20,132 f. EDe Slaira �a I - L) r S.F U�ft 4 0 U.R 1.737 V T.� Ls 0 ght Well to.mb V It Stair C) Ef 0 0 i -j UO a 8 . U.It 2 I�w T� Im" 1�w LLI U) um 0 z Up�, E5 Z2 L1 10 Fourth Floor Plan LU L IL \��4 Scole: 1/8' 1'-Ot 1 0 4' a 16 A1 .4 m U, L;iil;iii" Fourth Floor Total Area: 19,784 s.E I W71 Stair B 0 1 0 Lit T 0 Wit i.MIMF S . . fill 0 wit 510; 0 3 I.M3� Wit W2 41� Light Well 1.624 V W.� (twRi MtnR E fff U5 - Stair 0 T. Z, 0 U) 0 0 0 0 ------ t A Unit MR, L j I. w T— MR W7 2— Unit��v i.mg LLJ EJURN 5(XI T. 16. ";Qo cc) 0- r-1 u f a- tz r Plan UJI Fifth Floo 0 L) llt-Y scdc 1/8' 0 U) Fifth Floor �t'o'l Arm 18.259 s.f. I I r-1 I.M uw S.F . m Z ;L In 0 r PQ z 0 1.07 U7 Light Well El U) CD D E 13 T. oFffm 0 El E C stai 0 CD 0 0 Lj - — - — - -- — - ....... .... -rLn El Unit W IM28� Orr" umt 14V uw L-� L 1�U7 ---- It m Z11T.11� V LIJ 0 0 0 Ko 11 J� ou EL U-1 M: U a 4� IT IS! W A 40 1 0 Hol I Li Li A A Li-Li ILJ-J---i JE- pq 04 EITE] (OD AT �mw West Devotion Southwest Elevation 0 Ef M�-V Key Plan 0 0 i _5 0) (D Q a LLI (1) 0 16 CL 'xi ui a 4 U) A2.0 6� L5 U m W71>1 rma, OHM FRI <D 0 F� U RQJ _+m L 0 1 (D (D H 4w 1 V9 1 1 LI a IbIl S -4—L" 0 6 I Q)I I r Key Plan 0 m c 1 0 ;z Emma cm, . an. South Elevation . . . . . A LLJ rn 41 rn z w --A -A -0. L- Iij Z fL) Ali 4E 0 (3 U) U) Key Plan 0 0 East I P8 >, >a Scale: 1/8' 1,-V IR EM Em rm 4�) 1p uj cn z 16 3 a. uj 16 A2.2 JE DA ga E_ U21 E9 -ItTF TmF f Tp I ::H H7: -LI h- G 7id FE:: E o (s C -je ojf Key Plan 0 0 ' North Elevation Scale: 1/8' 1�0' EM cm ui FY z 4" LU 0 4� 6 16 co A2.3 6=mmmi z NEW TPO ROOF TYPICAL NEW WALL ILI CONSTRUCTION: STEEL FRAME WITH WD(PLANK EXTERIOR PANELS AND INT%PMD PANTED TYPICAL NEW FLOOR f METAL DECKING— CONSTRUCTION: 176.9V CONCRETE SLAB ON rnr C- r n FiCATIONS FOR i NEW BALCONY(SEE SPECI DECAILS) pa z NEW WINDOW SYSTEM irl 14.45 (TYI`ICAL FOR ALL WINDOWS EXCEPT ON FIRST FLOOR) r — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — EXISTING CEILINGS SCHEDULED TO REMAIN SHN1 BE FALING BRICK TO BE WDBLASTEI)AND REPLACED ABM THIRD PANTED (TYP.) FLOOR UNT0- SEE REPAIR�NEEDED STRUCTURAL REPORTS Fw� nmr.. - — — — — — - E 2 mum BFWX To BE E a REPIACED ABM THIRD FLOOR UNtEL SEE STRUCTURAL REPORTS— FRENCH E 1—Bk.CONIES 0 (wP SWb 0 0 0 0 EXISTING CONCRETE ECK. = SYSTEM TO BE 3/4- HAIDWOOD FLOOR "LED TO 2 LAYERS 1/2' PLYWOOD FLOATED ON CONCRETE FUOOR--:r S!-b Vvin. 100`-0' Section A C/) I/B*- 1'-0 KEYPLAN Lu A Lu A3.0 6�i L3 E, L) E- Z z C P�MD IM30CM PAIMD C—.Mew .JE RODF` ww W,60—.I5Lw VVIDOOS D �Ilocm) 0 Cj r w m ---—-—-—-—-—-—- _j _j It ------------- Maeaaa 2 A�1/2-RMOO�WD LX W-a' U.1 Section B KEYPLAN Ct) Scale: 1/8'= V-O* IL 0 1 g A p A -CL m LU A3.1 6mmm� Derby Lofts Condominiums Derby Lofts, L. L. C. E4 51 -71 Lafayette Street Salem, Massachusetts 01970 E. Schedule of Drawings: Architectural AO Cover Sheet D1.0 First & Second Floor Demolition Plan D1.1 Third & Fourth Floor Demolition Plan A1.1 First Floor Plan A1.2 Second Floor Plan A1.3 Third Floor Plan A1.4 Fourth Floor Plan A1.5 Fifth Floor Plan E A1.6 Sixth Floor Plan 2 A2.0 West Elevation A2.1 South Elevation E 0 A2.2 East Elevation r A2.3 North Elevation 0 E� A3.0 Building Sections A3.1 Building Sections A4.0 Window Types 0 0 ;z LU Architect: Civil Engineer: Mechanical, Electrical Structural Engineer: Owner: z E5 z Patrowicz Land Development Engineering Plumbing Engineer: Structures North Winter Street Architects, Inc. Derby Lofts, L.L.C. 209 Essex Street; Suite 300; 60 Washington Street TKG East, LTD. 60 Washington Street 843 Massachusetts Avenue Salem, MA 01970 700 Massachusetts Ave. Salem, MA 0 1970 Salem, MA 01970 Cambridge, MA 02139 < (978) 745-2288 Cambridge, MA 02139 (978) 745-6817 (978) 744-7379 (617) 491-8315 (617) 331-8714 AO General Demolition Notes I. �d 1�* 2. 3. 4. �qaft.w fa,wa,F'. Who- �W�at o . .... . .... z ............ All IR U) E p ip mrr it 0 0 p... ...... . y —j i 0 i it j i it nw ftaor am to --m fa, —————————————— 4 a 0 pp 0 0 0 0 I LI —.11 —J! P. it >1 it ....Tr 0 0 ----—----- -j;i ;z ------- "P 35 ---z= 145 q) 0 ------- -- 13 it P 1p -T, P to ----------- ---- — First Floor Demolition Plan Second Floor Demolition Plan IL \,�O scale. 1/16,= V-0, Scat. 1/16' V-0, 0 4 a 16 D1 .0 General Demolition Notes 4. 'Pw'=� E. Dq w 14 04 .JE- Z p p i. p c 0 -j a 0 _j _j .0 .0 -9 13 C Cl "r,.-- 1�TITTO -------------- ta Fourth Floor Demolition Plan Third Floor Demolition Plan Scal.; 1/16' SCOW 1116'= V-0, D1 .1 s tair B VA U RETAIL RETAIL L L 15,628 Sf z 3 LLJ LU U) ————————— ——————— H rough Area 1 If c 27 � -------- LU ---------- c) Building Comm n Area E 0ash nox Rox 3 F�M FW Aw 3 5 sf Aff 'E .9.0 at z caaxatxt� LOBBY wat E 0 -0 6 r Stair 0 0 -j J041 03 ME"� ptxal STM(M RETAIL ROOM MD REWV& 654 sf 0 0 -j I w� >% ENGINE HOU PIZZA RFTAII 2,003 sf 5,797 Sf LU z 4": ::�:j;::-iiw1 i:::: 111''aiwaaams 4 Ui First Floor Plan -------------- A1.2 scata,. i/e A1 .1 Fl,st Flo., otal Areo: 20,416 a.f. 6� ED Stair 8 z Unit M S.F &2 — EA cl E-I Z ...It 'a z Get 00 Ls 0 c it Light El h Well co E m L E 0 stal 0 T. 0 0 -i —j Ll (7D t U.H m 1,4n IiF T. UrIft=7 ---- co LLJ T.8 Unit M 1.517 W 0 T.� C-) Li 000 < :R LU Second, Floor Plan :D 1 1:1 1 11 SeCord Fao� Total Area: 20.132 s.f. scale: 1/8" � 1*-0' 1 0 16 StairB Z .� E- L) sw. U E- E- V] Mt 0 0 ED Ev 3 nit M z q a ll� Light L] wen 1.624 W E] (5 �000 0 D Stai 1.5m w 0 0 0 U) __j I I 1 11 t F 0 o LJO 06 -- ------ A t 7— � o T..ll� Ufflt W7 ILL) um C/3 1.517 T. z E] El CL 2 000 4', Third lo LU or Plan U \L-Y S..I.: o ;6 U) Third Fl�r total Area: 20.132 J. -T Stair Z T� T— E. S.. U CO3 W _JE- r4 V) E. ED U.R 4 0 9 I," P . T:2 3 UA T- - r-I Light Well 1.624 W mt C E:l E (5 06 . -a N D-- c Stal 0 T.ll.*� j U) __j 13 J3 m 3 ;z A 00 1 0 Wit CAR WK M)7 LI w I Ld UW U) Unh 4W 0 z T. El UQO i E:1 El CL El El 4- uj L Fourth Floor Plan scale: 1/8'- 1'-Ot AIA Fo.dh Fl..r Totol A,= 19,784 s.f. 6� StairB 0 0 II'm uw m------- 0 �JED U S.P-, E- E z I." T. Ligh Well (D4 — - 1.624 W El W -p Stair f 0 -! g U, o o 3 _5 A; El a C) t U T. Wt W7 %�w I I F- 0 Unh= LU 1.349 U) T.. WN 504 0 U�e o I z 1 I-:-_ �, -0- 0 E2 T— 11 0 16 0 E:1 13 CL Z 11 S2 Lj Ir I or Plan LU L Fifth Flo 7 Scale: 1/8'4 V-0, 4 a 16 A1 .5 F-.fth Roo, 1,W] A.: 18.259 C �o o U.nit 510 z UW 6 U) u L VI pq Z umt 5w Light WeR 1.�u 13 T. 0 60 .0 d Stair IS -j 0 0 r-I orrm1 uw 1�3 uw B".. lW— --- T.a".. 6 LLJ CI) *0 Lj OLZOO le. CL LU A1 .6 B A 4 I'l H I mi Ho L-J'L-i j(D FM �m r rn Li L-j— 1 10[a] [71 H It Lj---L-j ILL .-i Li Lil 4 PT In HAI Lm PF-d pl� F, F r ILL IE-�l LL� AT NIN v West Elevation Southwest Elevation Scale: 1/8' a" Scale: 1A, V V) U) Key Plan o 0 - _5 _5 (D Q) Cm rm J= s LLI CD CL LU X: L) U) A2.0 L3 . z rn I (D (D 0 Fe <ID —El— Z lia — A I r —T-T= 0 . . ... ................................................ =�77 Key Plan cn (n o o -j -Jl i >1 (D 4) South Elevation 2 scols, 1/8- 114. LU cn 0 z Z3 CL C3 ui L) 0 4 a CI) A J E-1 176" U WWI FM-u- u E4 12 0 ks 12 u U 10 z r U) [Tp ED I Ef It 79 0 _j D�OWK MO mmee Key Plan 0 0 i m-j East U.V.0011 >1 >� Scale: I/C V-0, (D (D Lm EM cM A ul U) 0 16 LU 0 4. a 16 CI) A2.2 6� o r z P z z t m a, V D��M 2 E 0 Key Plan o o 0 0 North Elevation Scale: 1/8' 1'—V .2 LU co 0 2f A a- E C3 4� LLJ 0 0 4- 8 A2.3 NEW TPO R" 0 E. TYPICAL NEW WALL L) CONSMCTION: STEEL FRAME WIN KARDIPI.ANK DMIOR PANELS AND INTERIOR PAINFED GINS TYPICAL NEW FLOOR CONSTRUCTION: El METAL DECKING— CONCRETE SLAS ON NEW BALCONY(SEE co SPECIFICATIONS FOR DETAILS) r4 NEW MNDOW SYSTEM (TYPICAL FOR ALL b WINDOWS EXCEPT ON es FIRST FLOOR)— F' h FI:l — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -- EXISTING CEILINGS SCHEDULED TO FAIUMG BRICK TO BE ROAN SRAILL BE z z SANDBLASTED AND FUMED ABOW THIRD PANTED (TfP.) FLOOR UNTEL S REPAIR AS NEEDED STRIK11)RAL REPORTS Fw� FAILING BRICK TO BE 'E REPLACED ABOVE THIRD -1 FLDOR UNTEL SEE = FRENCH E STRUMM REPORTS— 0 TMb Z.7128.5 M n. 0 0 Sl7b EW: 115.a - - - --- - - - - ON EXISTING CO CRETE N ECK, FLOOR SYSTEM TO BE 3/4- HARDWOOD FLOOR NNUED TO 2 LAYERS 1/2- PLWOOD FLOATED 0 CONCRETE TWO Gw nw i Sl.b 100*-V Section A F- LU Sc.le; 1/8' l'-D' KEYPLAN LU U) A3.0 E- z W� P�m �M�m ON-7 NE= -—-—-—-—-— amos) -—-—-—-—-— lei E 0 7�1 _j e C� W�m ------ -------------- - 0 0 ' 0 0 Cl a 31e�000 2 LZ uj Section B KEYPLAN Scale: 1/8' 1'–G' m L) A3.1 $*-e IH U n Ll T ME iiiiiiHiiiii E 0 r [ILI o o do —A LU to (D Iz 0 1 r-r It 3:=2:�f' 11 r-3:.4 i 1� I W� JU 4'-Q* LL:jj�L4=21 9 -d tm— mowh New Construction Window Types Existing/Renovated Window Types &ale: 1/4'= V-O' Scale. 1/4'- V-D' U) z Ft Mll Y�31e 11 v.- S- -r r7l E- I E- F4 E, V-IV SW r V1 0 4-r OJA 0 0 Z )H N-W T�- V 0 P—� .. wi. md h�md t— New Con truction Window Types r2-'� �x—i—sting/Renovoted Window Types LU S�le: 114"= 1�0' U) A4.0 04 Salem Redevelopment Authority " ) 3(j DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RECOMMENDATION 51 Lafayette Street (Derby Lofts �— Proposed Signage RECOMMENDATION: At their meeting on July 25,2005, the Design Review Board recommended approval of die proposed signage as revised. PROPOSAL: The proposal includes the installation wall signage at the Derby Lofts Development that will be cast bronze with white bronze patina with engraved dark patina text at the following locations: one (1) wall sign at the exterior residential entrances identifying the building; three (3) wall signs mounted on the exterior entrance and exit gates cautioning pedestrians; and one (1) wall sign at management entrance. The proposal also includes eight (8) hanging signs at the retail store locations that will be 2'-3" x 3'-l" painted MDF signage on an open painted galvanized steel fiame and mounting back plate. All are in accordance with the plans submitted by Winter Street Architects, Inc. dated July 15, 2005. NOTE: Each retailer will be required to come before the SRA/DRB for approval on the sign content prior to installation. 120 Washington Street - Salem, Massachusetts 01970 - (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 - Fax (978) 740-0404 Ed EQ S-01 F'T gOpen.pamled i� 0 ..1 frame Open painted galvanized O�n and mountmg Painted Galvanized steel frame and mounting Steel Frame & backplate. Backplate Mounted Panted MOF to Exterior Wall Painted MDF Signage Signage op-q, I Y-r Z r7n I C�und Lftel — cr-T ficnafBiadeSign 8" ovation of B(ad.Sign S knabon of sladesign X-VIZU Ld [All U Ld a F- U) It LU Z Vw�ef Made,Sion 51, �Jqde Si2nage-3D Perspectivell 5 Derby Lofts 51 Lafayette Street Salem, MA Derby Street Building Frontage Total Allowable Signage Area: 142'-5" SF Wall Projection Signage Total: 22.3 SF Wall Mounted Signage Total: 0 Total: 22.3 SF C1 Lafayette Street Building Frontage Total Allowable Signage Area: 154'-9" SF Wall Projection Signage Total; 14.9 SF C1 Wall Mounted Signage Total: 3.1 SF Total: 18.0 SF DID Central Street Building Frontage qJ C) Total Allowable Signage Area: 153'-2" SF --N-1 CD Wall Projection Signoge Total: 14.9 SF CD Ln CD LIJ Wall Mounted Signoge TotaL 1.7 SF Total: 16.6 SF (J) (D (D 0 U z N17 Ld L) LO W LO D D 142'-5"± D z Exterior Signage Location Plan Derby Street Derby Lofts Salem, Massachusefts Cost Bronze— w/White Bronze Patina Cost Bronze— w/White Bronze Patina 1j" Engraved Dark Patina Text CAUTION 1" Engraved Dark Patina Text Font: Verdono Font: Verdono —jC14 —1(N J L 1 1-2" CARS EXITING it �Cost Bronze — w/ White Bronze Patina �Beveled Edges (typ) DERBY Cast Bronze — w/ White Bronze Patina —ICN LOFTS Wall Sign Mounted on Exterior Entrance & Exit Gates - Pedestrian Caution C,1 11 �Beveled Edges (typ) Sign Type B L 2 51 1" Engraved Dark Patina Text Cost Bronze — w/ White Bronze Patina U LAFAYETTE STREET 10 Font: Verdano Cost Bronze — w/ White Bronze Patina Z ANRCG I" Engraved Dark Patina Text Font: Verdano U DEVELOPMENT 0') r!� Wall Sign at Exterior Residential Entrances Sign Type A ��Beveled Edges (typ) L1 It 1 '-4 Wall Sign at Management Entrance Refer to Signage Plan for Locations Sign Type C Z Signage Types & Details Derby Lofts Salem, Massachusetts 51-71 Lafayette Street Salem Laundry Building AL 44 ft*ft lu Salem Redevelopment Authority DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RECOMMENDATION 51-71 Laf;yette Street (Derby Lofts) -Amendment to the SRA approved Final De sign Plans for the project at 51-71 Lafayette Street. RECOMMENDAnON: At their meeting on May 26, 2004,the Design Review Board recommended approval of the proposal as submitted. PROPOSAL: The proposal includes the proposed material and color changes to the exterior of the Derby Lofts project. The proposed material change is for the upper floors and win be changed from Petrarch and Hardipanel to traditional stucco. In addition, the applicant is asking for approval on the proposed color selections for the various exterior materials. 120 Washington Street - Salem, Massachusetts 01970 - (978) 745-9595, Ext 311 - Fax (978) 740-0404 J W WINTER STREET ARCHITECTS, INC. T � 370 April 2004 Salem Redevelopment Authority Attn: Tania Hartford 120 Washington Street Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Dear Committee Members The intent of this submittal on behalf of the Derby Lofts Condominiums project is twofold. First,we would like to present some exterior material alterations from the previously approved submittal. And second,we would like to review with you the various exterior material color selections for the project. The previous material palette included all of the same materials for the lower floors as are shown on the attached drawings. These are existing brick and new brick to match,existing concrete block and Arriscraft masonry to coordinate with it,white painted wood windows on the first floor(mostly existing)and aluminum clad wood windows on the upper floors. The proposed material change is for the upper floors and includes the areas marked as 3 and 4 on the attached drawings. We had previously submitted Petrarch(a parielized synthetic stone)for the areas closer to the street and Hardipanel(a painted cementitious panel system)for the areas recessed from the street. This submittal shows a traditional stucco system in both of these areas, a three-layer system on metal lathe. The change is based primarily on the limitations of the proposed materials that were discovered during the Construction Document phase. First,as we reviewed the material properties and the attachment system of the Hardipanel with a technical consultant we determined that it would not be suitable for the upper floors of the building in this coastal condition, Second,the Petrarch system,while technically appropriate, has color and texture limitations that could not be reconciled with the existing building materials without using custom colors and high-end textures that the project budget could not support. We feel that the proposed stucco system solves both of these problems in its flexibility of finish and color and in its durability. In addition to this material change,we are submitting proposed color selections for the various exterior materials. These colors relate to three existing material conditions: the existing brick at the first and second floors of the South Building,the section of existing concrete block on the North Building that is to remain, and the existing white painted wood windows at the street level. The areas of new brick will match the existing in color and texture. The Arriscraft color selection presented here coordinates with the existing concrete block and will be shaped to match the profile of the block it is replacing. The stucco colors are in the same color range as the block with the varying values accentuating the varying depths of the fNade. We look forward to discussing these finishes with the SRA in person and we will bring material samples to the meeting. Yours, lei Kelly W. Foster,AIA Winter Street Architects, Inc. 209 ESSEX STREET,SUITE 300 SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970 PHONE 978.744.7379 FAX 978.741.0240 �.WSAjchitectsxom Exterior Materials Keynote Designations 3 L��Fin�on M�I Lmto�.Co;or I PnoouOr ApMvW�Pen*r�SptWio Swm 3 L�So.hn�.o M.1 L..,Color 2 -N%0oUWY app�"P�mw H��PRMI �ft-C.W.Sl�.Un,M—� C. ai-oft Coo�.M.M W R.W �W*Q C" R�—ol 5v.C,pi% Derby Street Z LI w <F> w Ch w z Lafayette Street Derby Lofts Salem, Massachusetts 4 z W Upper Floor Windows It 5 3 A First Floor Windows J J z Derby Lofts Salem, Massachusetts MPROIN 11 i, I am IN I WN a WIN = 111119, IN PRO r=---M 11 ,M-710 UNION in) ,ron, I M—uposs, M�ivm I E1111,i i i 0-7�,77A mi.Cms a jam ------------ 77 ------------- 1*0 IN L ------- ---- H --------- AC —————— ———— M a con ec on ec ation F-T� �� I�j 11 .- e ... 'A'- .-T -- — e 0 T -- a e��South Elevation Exle6or MOWIC13 X�ncte Designotions Key Plan 7 JA4.1 � eeeee;e, 0 ' 11 gig 7T-111 J-H ILL �EK P. All ]of (SO) <>! 01 11 11 11 In III I I III IF 7111 J' -If 81, 4st------ —4— Dwby Loft ComlomInlums Deft Loft LLC. WINTER STREU ARCHrEUS. INC. paLI ....... Lij 111 1 LF-1 FF-] I p p Ir I�T 41 I I i. I p p I 1 .4 ju 13 11 :4. 1 i lb I j i EED F7 T i t2 Loft CondornInIums Deft Dwby Loft,LLC. VINTER �REET ARCHInM. INC. —, `�, S.-I.W�.�� U, , . . I . T T L-JL-j -------- ------ ------------ ------------ - - --------- ---------------- 0- -- ---------- --- -- ----------------- ----------------- p---------- --------------- -------------- ----------------- -- --- ----------- --------------- -------- -- ----------- 11�----------------- —cl— E= MED- . ------- ------ ---------------- -- -- --—--------- r,�M.r x,x An-"IMF e��Drive-through North El Porlial East Elevation Key Plan Exterior Materials Keynote Designations 6 A4.4 lit : I !it 48� Dwby Lofts Conck>mInlums Dwby Lofts, LLC. MW—I�—E'R* 'STREET...ARCHITE=.LTI (x La. ��. w........ . . I! r M,6� CQ CITY OF SALEM DEPAR.TMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANLEY J.USOVICZ,JR. MAYOR 120 WASHINGTON STREET 4 SALE\%MAssAcHusEm 01970 JOSEPH P.WALSH,JR. TEL 978-745-9595*FAK 978-740-0404 DiREcToR December 17, 2002 Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals City of Salem 120 Washington Street Salem, MA 01970 RE: Redevelopment of the old Salem Laundry Building To Members of the Salem Zoning Board of Appeals: I am writing to update the members of the Board of Appeals on the status of the permitting for the Salem Laundry Building Project, which is before your board on Wednesday, December 18, 2002. Due to the number of permitting steps this project will go through as well as the separate jurisdictions of each board in the process, I thought this brief update might be helpful prior to your review. In addition to your review of the application to vary from the Zoning Ordinance,this project will also undergo separate and extensive design and site plan reviews. Since the project is located within the Salem Urban Renewal Area, it wrill require review and approval by the Salem Redevelopment Authority(SRA), as well as design review by the SRA's Design Review Board (DRB). (For your information, the redevelopers made their first public presentation of their plans for the building at the SRA meeting last Wednesday.) Following your deliberations on their request for variances from zoning, the project will continue to receive design review and approval from the SRAIDRB. In addition to the SRAJDRI3 review, the project will require site plan review by the Planning Board, due to the number of units and the size of the addition. This review will also commence following the ZBA's review. I hope that helps clarify the review process for this major downtown project. Please let me know if I can be of ftirther assistance to you concerning the review process. Sincerely, qaal�ac voww'/w Joseph P. Walsh, Jr. Director CITY OF A LD1. MA Citp of �balzm, fRa!5!5arbu!5ett!5 CLEM'S OFFICE Planiiing �3oarb - 1 A cl: OQ (Pneibalem Oreen ZOO) JUL Site Plan Review Decision July 1, 2003 Derby Lofts LLC. C/o Tinti, Quinn, Grover& Frey, P.C. Attorneys at Law 222 Essex Street Salem, MA 01970 RE: Derby Lofts LLC. 51-71 Lafayette Street Site Plan Review Decision On Thursday, May 1, 2003, the Planning Board of the City of Salem opened a Public Hearing regarding the application of the Derby Lofts LLC under Site Plan Review for the renovation of an existing four story structure, and the addition of two stories, resulting in a total building square footage of 115,356 sq. ft. The structure will consist of retail uses on the first floor (approximately 15,000 sq. ft.) and 54 residential units on the second through sixth floor. An additional 6,000 square feet will be devoted to the entryway for the residential floors and a drive through vehicle drop off area. The public hearing was continued to May 15, 2003 and June 5, 2003. The Public Hearing was closed on June 5, 20033. At a regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Board held on June 5, 2003, the Board voted by a vote of nine in favor, none opposed, to approve the application as complying with the requirements of Site Plan Review subject to the following conditions: 1. Conformance with the Plan Work shall conform with the plans entitled, "Derby Lofts Condominiums, Derby Lofts, LLC." Including sheets AO.0, C0.0, CO.1, CO.2, CO3, Al.1, AI.2, A2.0, A2.1, A2.2, and A2.3, prepared bv Winter Street Architects, Inc. 209 Essex, Suite 300, Salem, MA 01970 and dated April 3, 2001). One Salem Green, Salem, Massachusetts 01970 (978) 745-9595 ext. 311 Fax (978) 740-0404 2. Amendments Any amendments to the site plan shall be reviewed by the City Planner and if deeme, cessary 0� by the City Planner, shall be brought to the Planning Board. Any waiver of c( nreoPlained within shall require the approval of the Planning Board. 1/ .1 3. Landscaping OS- a. All landscaping shall be done in accordance with the approved set of plans. b. Trees shall be a minimum of 3 V2" caliper. C. Maintenance of landscape vegetation shall.be the responsibility of the developer, his successors or assigns. d. Any street trees removed as a result of construction shall be replanted. The location of the trees shall be approved by the City Planner prior to replanting. C. After such landscaping is completed, the developer will add further landscaping if such is requested by the Planning Board or the City Planner. 4. Signage Proposed signage shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and the Sign Review Corrunittee. 5. Air Conditioning Units If any air conditioning units are constructed on the roof that can be seen above the roofline they shall be properly screened with lattice. The proposed screening shall be approved by the City Planner prior to installation. 6. Lighting a. A final lighting plan (showing street lighting and building lighting) shall be submitted to the City Planner for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. b. No light shall cast a glare onto adjacent parcels or adjacent rights of way. C. The applicant, his successors, or assigns shall install four Standard Salem Period Lights to replace the four existing cobra lights, along those portions of Lafayette and Central Streets that are adjacent to the site. Two Double Fixture Salem Standard Period Lights shall be installed to replace the two existing cobra lights located along the west side of Lafayette Street, and two Single Fixture Salem Standard Period Lights shall be installed to replace the remaining two cobra lights adjacent to the site, one on the east side of Lafayette and one on Central Street. The locations and specifications of the li-hting shall be reflected on a revised lighting plan submitted and approved by the Department of Planning and Community Development and the City Electrician prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 2 d. Building lighting will be located along the perimeter of the building at approximate locations shown on the elevations dated June 10, 2003, and entitled, "Derby Lofts Condominiums" and prepared by Winter Street Architects Inc. There shall be at least fourteen lights installed along the perimeter: four along the east elevation, four along the south elevation, four along the west elevation and two along the southwest elevation. Any changes in the location or number of lights must be submitted and approved by the City Planner prior to installation of the building lighting. The exact specification for the lighting fixtures shall approved by the City Planner prior to the E- issuance of a Building Permit. C-)— r- 7. Conservation Commission All work shall comply with the Order of Conditions issued by the Salem Conservation Commission, if applicable. C)F- -ri r- > n- i7 8. Garage/Drive Through Area -0 5 a. The final design for the garage door located at the drive through entrywa)j�hall be m submitted and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of a building pffinit. b. As a safety precaution, a visual warning device shall be placed at the exit of the drive through area to warn pedestrians of possible exiting vehicles. A mirror and a warning sign shall also be placed in this area so as to wam vehicles of pedestrians crossing the drive through. Plans showing an elevation and the location of the devices shall be submitted and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of a building permit. 9. Parking a. If the applicant completes a parking study of the area surrounding the site it shall be submitted to the Department of Planning and Community Development for their files. b. The applicant shall lease 81 parking spaces, equivalent to one and a half parking spaces per residential unit, at the South Harbor Garage until such time as other accommodations may be made. Documentation of the leasing of these spaces shall be provided to the Department of Planning and Comnamity Development prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 10. Construction Practices All construction shall be carried out in accordance with the following con.ditions: a. Work shall not be conducted between the hours of 5:00 PM and 8:00 AM the following day on weekdays or at any time on Sundays or Holidays. The Planning Board will agree to'any proposed changes in the starting time, if approved by a formal vote of the City Council. I cc 0� All reasonable action shall be taken to minimize the negative eff ts of construction on abutters. Advance notice shall be provided to all abutters in writing at 3 least 72 hours prior to commencement of construction of the project. C. Any drilling and blasting shall be limited to Monday-Friday between 8:00 AM until 5:00 PM. There shall be no drilling or blasting on Saturdays, Sundays, or holidays. Blasting shall be undertaken in accordance with all local and state regulations, d. All construction vehicles shall be cleaned prior to leaving the site so that they do not leave dirt and/or debris on surrounding roadways as they exit the site. e. All construction shall be performed in accordance with the Rules and Regulations of the Planning Board, and in accordance with any and all rules,regulations and ordinances of the City of Salem. f. All construction vehicles left overnight at the site, must be located completely on the site. 9. A Construction Management Plan and Construction Schedule shall be submitted by the applicant prior to the issuance of a building permit. Included in this plan, but not limited to, shall be a demolition plan, information regarding how the construction equipment will be stored, a description of the construction staging area and its location in relation to the site, and where the construction employees will park their vehicles. The plan and schedule shall be submitted and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 11. Clerk of the Works A Clerk of the Works shall be provided by the City, at the applicant, his successors or assigns' expense, as is deemed necessary by the City Planner. 12. Board of Health All work shall comply with the requirements of the Salem Board of Health, if applicable. C_ 13. Fire Department M All work shall comply with the requirements of the Salem Fire Department. �O :X r 14. Building Inspector r-, All work shall comply with the requirements of the Salem Building Inspector. > _n -0 C)" M 15. Utilities C=) a. An existing Utilities Plan and Utility Installation Plan shall be reviewed an(T approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. b. Drainage calculations relating to the roof run-off and drive through area shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 16. Exterior Elevations a. Final elevations shall be reviewed and approved in writing by the City 4 Planner prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 17. Maintenance a. Refuse removal, ground maintenance and snow removal shall be the responsibility of the developer, his successors or assigns. b. Winter snow in excess of snow storage areas on the site shall be removed off site. C. Maintenance of all landscaping shall be the responsibility of the applicant, his successors or assigns. The applicant, his successors or assigns, shall guarantee all trees and shrubs installed at the site for a two- (2)year period. d. A refuse dumpster shall be located in the interior of the building as indicated on the plan. 18. As-built Plans As-built plans, stamped by a Registered Professional Engineer, shall be submitted to the Department of Planning and Community Development and Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of the final Certificate of Occupancy. 19. Violations Violations of any condition shall result in revocation of this permit by the Planning Board, unless the violation of such condition is waived by a majority vote of the Planning Board. I hereby certify that a copy of this decision and plans has been filed with the City Clerk and copies are on file with the Planning Board. The Special Permit shall not take effect until a copy of this decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that twenty (20) days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed or that if such appeal has been filed, and it has been dismissed or denied, is recorded in the Essex South Registry of Deeds and is indexed under the name of the owner of record is recorded on the owner's Certificate of Title. The owner or applicant, his successors or assigns, shall pay the fee for recording or registering. (� Jt� - �16_�,E 1v16, Walter B Power, III Chairman C-) C:) -P c:� 5 U1 CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD January 29,2004 Mr. Matt Picarsic RCGLLC 17 Ivaloo Street Suite 100 Somerville, MA 02143 RE: Building Pertnit for the Parcel Located at 51-71 Lafayette Street Perby Lofts) Dear Mr. Picarsic: The Department of Planning& Community Development sent a letter dated October 30, 2003,which approved the Building Department routing slip allowing the owners of 51-71 Lafayette Street to obtain a building permit, but required the applicant to submit certain plans and details within 30 days. The applicant did not receive a building permit and therefore did not submit the required information within 30 days. As I understand, the applicant has provided the Building Department with the necessary information to move forward with the building permit. The Department of Planning& Community Development (DPCD) has not yet been provided with the information requested in its letter of October 30, 2003. Thus, DPCD approves the issuance of a building permit for Derby Lofts,with the following condition: "Any work associated with the fagade and/or the exterior materials of the structure cannot commence prior to review and-approval by the Salem Redevelopment Authority and the Planning Board of the change in material as shown on the plans dated August 15, 2003. If the change in material is not approved by either or both boards, then the applicant must submit plans showing the material as initially approved by the SRA and the Planning Board (plans dated April 3, 2003 and on file in the DPCD office)." Following the Board's decision concerning the change in material, I will provide written notification to the Building Inspector. In addition, as required by the previous letter, the following items must be submitted to the Department within thirty (30) days for review and approval following the issuance of the building permit: 1. Building lighting placement 2. Required period lights 3. Final lighting plan (types of light fixtures) 4. Final design of gate on the drive—thru 5. Drive—thin visual warning devices including a mirror,warning sign,and alarm 120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 0 1970 *TEL: 978.745.9595 FAx: 978.740.0404 *WWW.SALEM.COM I will notify the Building Inspector in writing following the Department's approval. Please contact me at DPCD if you have any questions or need further information. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Sincerely, I &xt& 01&�k Denise S. McClure,AICP Assistant City Planner CC: Thomas St. Pierre, Acting Building Corrunissioner Mark Meche,Winter Street Architects Mark Pilnentel,J.J. Welch&Co. -X CITY OF SALEM DEPAR-TMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANLEY J.USOVICZ,JR. MAYOR 120 WASHIN=N STR-EE-r 0 SALEN%MASSACHUSET-rs 01970 JOSEPH P.WALSH,JR. TEL:978-745-9595*FAK 978-740-0404 DIRECTOR MEMORANDUM TO: Thomas St. Pierre, Acting Building Commissioner Department of Public Properties FROM: Denise S. McClure, Deputy Directo4A, 6 Department of Planning and Community Development CC: Mark Meche, Winter Street Architects DATE: October 20, 2003 RE: Building Permit for the Parcel Located at 51-71 Lafayette Street Perby Lofts) The attached routing slip has been approved by the Department of Planning and Community Development PPCD) with the following condition: "Any work associated with the faqade and/or the exterior materials of the structure cannot commence prior to review and approval by the Salem Redevelopment Authority and the Planning Board of the change in material as shown on the plans dated August 15, 2003. If the change in material is not approved by either or both boards, then the applicant must submit plans showing the material as initially approved by the SRA and the Planning Board(plans dated April 3,2003 and on file in the DPCD Office)." Following the Board's decision concerningthe change in material,Iwill provide written notification to the Building Inspector. In addition,the Planning Board required that the following items be approved by the Department of Planning and Community Development prior to the issuance of a Building Permit: 1. Building lighting placement 2. Required period lights 3. Final lighting plan (types of light fixtures) 4. Final design of gate on the drive- thru 5. Drive -thru visual warning devices including a mirror, warning sign, and alarm These items will be submitted to the Department within thirty(30)days for review and approval. I will notify the Building Inspector in writing following the Department's approval. Please contact me at DPCD if you have any questions or need further information. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. CITY OF SALEM DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM TO: DeniseMcClure FROM: Valerie Gingrich and Tania Hartford/XX SLJBJECT: DERBY LOFTS,LLC.—REVIEW OV CONSTRUCTION PLANS DATE: October 16, 2003 We have reviewed the Construction Plans submitted by Derby Lofts,LLC (dated August 15, 2003) as to whether they reflect the Planning Board (PB) approved site plan (dated April 3,2003),the decision of the Planning Board (dated July 1,2003) and the Salem Redevelopment Authority (SRA) approval.( Taly q,20D) ) 1. The following are our comments on the Submitted Plans: Overall Plans Material has changed on the new upper floors from Hardipanel Cladding to a Stucco Finish on Metal Lathe. 'Me Motion of the SRA stipulated that if any materials changed, the applicant would be required to return to the Board for approval. First Floor Area of drive-thru increased from 2,351 sq. ft.to 2,876 sq. ft. Size of the retail space has decreased in square footage by approximately 300 sq. ft. on Derby Street and 350 sq. ft. in the rear retail space. Shape of the drop-off zone changed and moved toward Central Street East Elevation Window and door placement changed in the upper two floors of the building Overhead doorway in the Trash Room on Central Street shown in the Approved Plans is replaced with a storefront type doorway in the Submitted Plans West Elevation 9 'Window and door placement changed in the upper two floors of the building 2. The PB Decision requires that a number of items be approved by the City Planner before the issuance of a budding permit. These items are split up below by those items included in the Submitted Plans and those that were not. Items Included — Building Lighting Placement — Required Period Lights Items Not Included — Final Lighting Plan (types of light fixtures) — Final design of Gate on Drive-Thru (detail not included);wrought iron requested and galvanized metal was submitted — Drive-thru visual warning device including a mirror,warning sign, and alarm 3. The SRA motion required that the applicant receive approval by the Department of Planning and Community Development on the materials and fighting. The only additional item not fisted above is the following: 0 No detail on the type of clock to be constructed at the comer fagade. CITY OF SALEM DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SHEET qo� FROM: Matt Picarsic Tania Hartford COMPANY: DATE: RCG 9/3/03 FPANUMBER: TOTAL NO.OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER: 617/491-2135 7 PHONE NUMBER: SENDER'S REFERENCE NUMBER: 617/293-7935 978/745-9595 x311 RE: SENDER'S FAX NUMBER: DerbyLofis 978/740-0404 OURGENT OFORREVIEW 0 PLEASE COMMENT 0 PLEASE REPLY 0 PLEASE RE�ICLE NOTES/COMMENTS: Per your request, I am anaching the minutes of the Salem Redevelopment Authority meeting on July 9,2003. Please contact me if you need further information regarding the Final Approval of the SRA for the Derby Lofts project. Thankyou. 120 WASHINGTON STREET SALEM, MA 01970 THARTFORD@SALEM.COM MINUTES OF THE BOARD MEETING OF THE SALEM REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORrIY HELD ON JULY 9, 2003 A regular meeting of the Salem Redevelopment Authority (SRA) Board was held in the third floor conference room at the City Hall Annex, 120 Washington Street, on Wednesday,July 9, 2003 at 6:00pm. Chairman Robert Curran called the meeting to order and on roll call, the following members were present: Conrad Baldini, Michael Brennan, Michael Connelly, Robert Curran, and Russell Vickers. Joseph Walsh, Executive Director of the SRA, Tania Hartford, Economic Development Planner, and Valerie Gingrich,Clerk were also present. Minutes Mr. Baldini made a motion to approve the minutes from the May 7, 2003 and June 11, 2003 meetings, and Mr.Vickers seconded the motion. Motion passed (5-0). Discussion/New Business 1. Executive Director's Report Mr.Walsh, Executive Director,provided the Board with his report. • A letter was sent to the Peabody Essex Museum (PEM) asking them to return to the Board to address the outstanding issue of the Marine Arts Gallery wall. A response from the PEM asked for a request incorporating the issues. A lengthier letter was sent to the PEM on June 23, 2003 and there has not been a reply. • Mr.Walsh stated that in a recent newspaper article, the PEM commented that there will not be pedestrian access through the Museum from Essex Street to Charter Street. The next round of correspondence will address the fact that such a decision by the PEM is a violation of both the SRA's decision and the Planning Board's decision. Free pedestrian access through the Museum Atrium is a condition included in both decisions. The PEM will have to come back to the Board to request an amendment. At this point, Mr. Curran recognized Councilor OLeary. Councilor O'Leary commented that the City gave up two pieces of property and a street. He commented that the Board needs to take a stand on this issue in a straightforward manner. In regards to the wall, the Board decided that they win wait for a response from the PEM before any action is taken. Mr.Walsh stated that he win inform the PEM that their decision to not allow access through the building is a violation of the SRA decision, Planning Board decision, and City Council. • Mr. Walsh gave an update on the contamination found at the Old Police Station site. A report on remediation, source and costs is expected in the next 30 days. Mr. Walsh informed the Board that there is a chance that Beverly Cooperative Bank will not finance the cleanup. He explained that it will be hard for the developer to get conventional financing for the cleanup, and the Board could use the revenue from selling the Old Police Station to finance the cleanup. • Mr. Walsh stated that the Licensing Board has requested copies of the current cafe permits, and the Est will be provided. • Mr.Walsh asked the Board to vote on two issues: • It has been requested by the Mayor that the two benches at the fountain on Washington and Essex Streets be removed because the benches are in bad shape and because of loitering. Mr. Baldini made a motion to have the benches repaired, but never permanently removed. Mr. Brennan seconded the motion. Motion passed (5-0). • It is requested that the Board vote to approve a contract for services with Winter Street Architects for conceptual ideas for the Marketplace and Salem Evening News Budding. Winter Street would present these ideas next month. Funding would be supplied through the Community Development Block Grant. Mr. Vickers made a motion to establish a contract for services with 'Winter Street Architects for the Marketplace project. Mr. Connelly seconded the motion. Motion passed (5-0). DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS 2. Derk Lofts (51-71 Lafayette Street)—Review of the final submission for the development of a mixed-use development on the comer of Lafayette and Derby Streets in the former Laundry Building. Attorney Scott Grover thanked the Board for the previous schematic approval of the project and stated that the project is being warmly received in the neighborhood. Mr. Grover informed the Board of the goal of starting construction in the fall. Mr. Walsh stated that the Planning Board has approved the project, and it is appropriate for the Board to give a final approval of the project tonight or send it back to the Design Review Board for additional review. Mark Meche presented the project to the Board. He stated that they are starting the construction process and would like to pull a building permit in September. Mr. Meche explained that the Planning Board had asked them to make some changes, which include a wrought iron entrance to the Carriage Way, an audible alarm when exiting onto Central Street, and period lighting around the building and across the street. In addition, the dock on the comer facade will remain. Mr. Meche stated that because signage will depend on the tenants, they will come back to the Board with proposals for signage when plans are more concrete. Mr. Baldini inquired as to the projected completion date. Mr.Meche replied that the project will be completed 14 months from the start date. Mr. Brennan asked whether there will be a deck on the roof Mr. Meche showed the Board the proposed decks and stated that there will be a small area on the roof near the elevator,which will be considered a deck. Mr. Brennan inquired as to the total number of units. Mr.Meche replied that there win be 54 units. Mr. Vickers asked about the parking in the South Harbor Garage. Mr. Grover replied that leasing parking in the garage is not really practical and that they need to have parking closer to the site. Mr.Meche stated that the developer is currently in negotiations with 4 separate possible sites, and that 2 of the deals are ready to be finalized. They would like to do a mixed-use project that includes parking. Mr. Walsh stated that the Building Inspector cannot issue a Certificate of Occupancy until the parking h i as been leased. Mr. Brennan asked whether the developer would go through with the construction in September if the parking aspect was not yet finalized. Mr. Meche stated that they would. Mr. Vickers inquired as to who gets the parking spaces if there are several projects that want to lease spaces. Mr. Grover stressed that leasing spaces in the South Harbor Garage is not the way that they want to solve the parking situation and that it is simply the way to fulfill the legal requirement while they finalize an alternative. Mr. Vickers asked whether Central Street will remain one-way, Mr. Meche replied that they are not changing any traffic patterns, and that they have a proposal for a traffic/parking study in the works. Mr.Walsh informed the Board that the Planning Board approved the project with the condition that the applicant would return to the Planning Director for the final approval of fighting,utility materials, and roof materials. The applicant would need to return to the Board if any of the materials changed. Mr. Baldini motioned to approve the project with the condition that the applicant return to the Executive Director of the SRA to receive final approval of the materials and fighting. Mr. Vickers seconded the motion, and the motion passed (4-0). Mr. Brennan abstained. Mr. Walsh stated that he would inquire at the City Solicitor's office regarding the process for leasing spaces in the South Harbor Garage. 3. Lawrence Place (143 Washington/32 Front Street)—Review of final submission for the development of a mixed-use development on the comer of Washington and Front Streets in the former Bleachers Building. Mr.Walsh introduced the project and informed the Board that the DRB would like another look at it since it has been revised. The number of residential condominium units increased from 8 to 10. David Pabich explained that the Planning Board had asked for some modifications to the project because of resistance to the idea of residential units on the first floor of Derby Square. The new proposal changes the residential to professional home office space on the first floor. The first floor contains office and kitchen space. Mr. Pabich explained that this change might decrease the value of the units because living space decreases; therefore they have increased the total number of units from 8 to 10. The number of bedrooms decreased from 20 to 17. Mr. Baldini commented that home office space is a good idea and it makes sense. Mr. Pabich replied that home office space might have tax benefits. Mr. Pabich addressed the roof material issue, stating that the roof is a 200 year slate roof that is about 200 years old, and it is in great disrepair. Mr.Pabich explained that the slate will be replaced with an asphalt replica with copper detailing at the request of the DRB. The windows will be aluminum clad with narrower muttons, from 7/8" to 5/8". The fighting will not be changed and the signage will depend on who leases the retail units. They will return to the Board in respect to signage. Mr. Pabich stated that, again at the request of the DRB, he would like to add about 6 skylights to the Front Street side of the budding. Mr.Vickers asked if there will be an elevator. Mr. Pabich replied that there will not. Mr.Pabich stated that he would like to show the DRB a revised plan with more skylights at their next meeting. Mr. Curran commented that the proposal looks good and that they win wait to vote on it until the DRB gets another look at it. DEIGN REVIEW BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS 4. Nostalgi (103 Washington Street)—Consideration of DRB recommendation for proposed sign. On June 25, 2003, the Design Review Board PRB) gave a positive recommendation for a sign application for the building located at 103 Essex Street. The proposal consists of a 23" x 32" wood sign attached to a black decorative metal bracket. The sign includes a Lavender background with black and white graphics and text. At the request of the DRB, the applicant agreed to change the text to Palatino and remove the white text outline for the business name. Mr. Brennan made a motion to accept the recommendation of the DRB, Mr. Connelly seconded. Motion passed (5-0). 5. Salem's Color Comer (60 Washington Street)—Consideration of DRB recommendation for proposed sign. On June 25, 2003, the DRB gave a positive recommendation for the proposed signage for the building located at 60 Washington Street. The proposal consists of two 14" x 120" wood wall signs to be installed along the Washington Street and Lynde Street facades. At the request of the DRB, the applicant changed the text to a serif style font, increased the letter spacing, added a chamfered edge, and reduced the height of the sign by 6 inches. Mr. Brennan made a motion to accept the recommendation of the DRB,Mr. Vickers seconded. Motion passed (5-0). 6. Aroma Sanctum (5 Central Street)—Consideration of DRB recommenclation for proposed sign. On June 25, 2003, the DRB recommended approval of the proposed sign for the building located at 5 Central Street. The proposal consists of a 1h" thick PVC hanging sign with a decorative metal bracket. The proposed sign is 17" x 30" and includes a green background with gold lettering. At the request of the DRB,the applicant agreed to change the shape and location of the metal bracket to match the historic metal brackets on the building. In addition, the applicant agreed to change the typography to improve the legibility of the sign. Mr. Vickers motioned to accept the DRB recommendation, Mr. Brennan seconded. Motion passed (5-0). 7. LibgU T (155 Washington Street)—Consideration of DRB recommendation for proposed sign. On May 28, 2003, the DR.B gave a positive recommendation for a proposed wall sign for the building located at 155 Washington Street. The proposal consists of an 11" x 120" sign attached to an existing sign band. At the request of the DRB, the height of the sign was reduced by 2", the background color was changed from wh�ite to off-white, the text color was changed to maroon and the graphic logo was changed to a dark blue. In addition, the DRB requested that the applicant change the text style to Palatino. Mr. Connelly motioned to accept the DRB recommendation, Mr. Baldini seconded. Motion passed (5-0). 8. Rockafellas (231 Essex Street)—Consideration of DRB recommendation for proposed outdoor cafe. On June 25, 2003, the DRB gave a positive recommendation for the proposed outdoor caf6 located at 227-231 Essex Street. The proposed caf6 is located along the Washington Street side of the building and includes twelve (12) 30" round tables and 36 chairs. A black metal chain and black metal freestanding bollards will define the seating area. Mr. Baldini motioned to accept the DRB recommendation, Mr. Connelly seconded. Motion passed (5-0). OTHER BUSINESS 9. Salem YMCA (120 Washington Street)—Consideration of revised sign proposal. The revised sign has the same color scheme with an encircled "120" in the middle, and "Second Floor" at the bottom. The sign will be placed at the comer of the door at 120 Washington Street. Mr. Baldini informed the Board of his research, stating that there are not any signs in the downtown with addresses on them. Mr. Brennan motioned to approve the sign,Mr. Connelly seconded.Motion passed (5-0). 10. Derby D (245 Derby Street)—Consideration of revised sign proposal. The revised sign is the same style as the one that previously existed at Brothers Deli. However, Mr. Walsh informed the Board that they may change their name. Mr. Brennan motioned to approve the revised sign,Mr. Connelly seconded. Motion passed (5-0). There being no further business, Mr. Baldini motioned to adjourn the meeting, Mr. Brennan seconded the motion. Motion passed (5-0). Meeting stands adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Valerie Gingrich,Clerk Department of Planning&Community Development Salem Redevelopment Authority June 30, 2003 DELIVERED BY HAND Mr. Scott M. Grover,Attorney Tinti,Quinr�,Grover&Frey,P.C. 222 Essex Street Salern,MA 01970 RE: Derby Lofts Project- 51-71 Lafayette Street Dear Mr. Grover: As you are aware, the Derby Lofts Project at 51-71 Lafayette Street received Schematic Approval by the Salem Redevelopment Authority(SRA) on May 7, 2003. The next milestone for this project is final approval by the SRA. The Final Plan submission should include a full set of construction plans, final building materials, proposed building lighting, color samples, and a landscaping plan, if applicable. In addition to including comments from the Planning Board, the plans should also incorporate the following comments as recommerided by the Design Review Board PRB) and SRA in their initial review of the project: • Alternatives for a stronger cornice and roof treatment that establishes a strong top,middle and base (not just retreating from the street); • alternatives for window proportions with more vertical emphasis; • attention to the brick details and overall richness of the fagade; • preservation of some of the elements from the existing comer and the integration of a circular clock directly below the existing dock location; • integration of signage into the fagade design - would like to see the use of awnings to add color, activity and reduced sun exposure; and • integration of different "signs of habitation" - balconies should convey a residential character. Enclosed is a schedule of upcoming SRA meetings, including the deadlines for submission. For your information, the next SRA meeting will be held on July 9. If you plan to submit final plans at this meeting, please contact the Department of Planning and Community Development so we may assist you. Feel free to contact me at 978/745-9595 x311 if you have questions regarding the review process or the requirements of the SRA. Sincerely yours, �6�� 4 I�b'jj T - H ord Economic Development Planner Enclosure cc: Joseph P.Walsh, Executive Director,SRA Mark Meche, Principal,Winter Street Architects 01/29/03 13:48 FAX 978 745 3369 TINTI QUINN GROVER FREY. Z001/001 TINTI, QUINN, GROVER & FREyt P.C. 222 ESSEX STREET SALEK MASSACHUSETTS 01970-3705 WILLIAM I TINTI TELEPHONE WILLIAM B.ARDIFF(1965-1995) WILLIAM F.QUINN (976)7458065- (978)744-2948 MARCIA MULFORD CINI 'r OF COUNSEL .-Orr M.GROVER TELEODPIER MARC P.FREY (978)745-3.369 H'SWICH OFFICE TWO CENTRAL STREET IPSWICK MASSACHUSETTS 01936 (979)356-7978 January 29, 2003 BY FAcsimu (978) 740-0404 Don Gn-ard Department of Planning&Community Development 120 Washington Street Salem, MA 01970 RE: 5 1-71 Lafayette Street, Salem�Massachusetts Dear Don: I am writing to request that the discussion of the above referenced property with the Design Review Board scheduled for this evening be continued to the next meeting on February 26,2003. lbank you for your cooperation. Very truly yours, Scott M. Grover SMG/pdd Department of Planning and Community Development 120 Washington Street, 3rd Floor Salem, MA 0 1970 978-745-9595 x 311 978-740-0404 fax Fbx To: Scott Grover From: Don Giard Fax: 978-745-3369 Pages: 1 Phone, Date; 1/29/03 Re: 51-71 Lafayette Street CC: 11 Urgent IZ For Review 0 Please Comment 11 Please Reply El Please Recycle Winter Street Architects informed me that they are not ready to meet with the Design Review Board for continued review of 51-71 Lafayette Street. Could you forward correspondence to our office confirming that you do not wish to allend tonight's meeting? For your reference, I have included a copy of the Salem Redevelopment Authority and Design Review Board Schedule for 2003. Let me know if you have any questions. I can be reached at (978) 745-9595 ext 311 or at dgiardCc�salem.com. Thanks. TINT11 QUINN� GROVER & FREY, P.C. 222 ESSEX STREET SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970-3705 WILLIAM J.TINTI TELEPHONE WILLIAM B,ARDIFF(1965- 1995) WILLIAM I. QUINN (978)745-8065 - (978)744-2948 MARCIA MULFORD CINI SCOTT M.GROVER TELECOPIER OF COUNSEL MARC 1'. FREY (978)745-3369 IPSWICH OFFICE: TWO CENTRAL STREET IPSWICH.MASSACHUSETTS 01938 (978) 3 56 7878 December 5, 2002 By HAND Denise Sullivan Assistant City Planner 120 Washington Street Salem, MA 0 1970 RE: 51-71 Lafayette Street, Salem, Massachusetts Dear Denise: I have enclosed seven sets of materials relating to the proposed development of the above referenced property for submission to the Salem Redevelopment Authority. We will plan to attend the Authoritys Public Mecting on December 11, 2002 to present the proposal for preliminary review. Thank you for your assistance. Very truly yours, G/rov(erC SMG/pdd Enclosures MIN F" I I I I I RON WINTER STREET ARCHITECTS7 INC . L; z r--------r-- L—ILI ril PPM nr FIP C Z! 0 if e ;z �i West Elevation Southwest Elevation scale: I/a, 1'-0* Scole: IA' 1'-0* 'T� z LLJ '6 0 > tu OL w 0 4 6 16 A4 0 Key Plan L= z u ------------- Fill I IF] 1 1- L' u ;1U ALT -AA-ThH-�El IH AD[ c j 0 m m 0 0 South Devotion Scale: 1/8' V-0, Cm EM z LU 16 0 > ui Lr) L Lu 0 4' 6 16 Key Plan z cn PF FFFI� 11 ul III !I lip LHI FT FF I-A rg � A CIE LI111111111111 R� to E 0 J Ll Tu- 0 g j 0 o 0 4D ;z East Elevation 0 > LU 0 z 0 U) ui 0 A4.2 Key Plan 6mmmmi I--T-T- LLH I L--L I w z HEAH EtAzL TF-----i ri Co IT 4F d r 0 if _j v r- V o o 0 (D North Elevation Scale 1/8' 1'-0' CIO EM CM 2:10 E:::, w 4(�) 2 .0 . . . LLJ > w l5 z 4'- 0 U) w a W 6 16 A4.3 Key Plan L;;;� DERBY LOFTS CONDOMINIUMS Salem, Massachusetts fw $ -MA Existing Salem Laundry Buildings -Aff- DERBY LOFTS CONDOMINIUMS Salem, Massachusetts OEM, 7-T 00 10 41 JA 4r Perspective View from Lafayette and Derby Streets in Context DERBY LOFTS CONDOMINIUMS Salem, Massachusetts __-IT-F Perspective View from Derby Street in Context Salem Laundry Building Sidewalk Improvements along Central Street Issues • Narrow sidewalk (5' wide) • No street trees • Minimal lighting • Extensive street width (currently 26' from curb to curb w/ parallel parking on the eastern side of street) Concept • Extend width of sidewalk to 10' (concrete w/ brick accents) — still allows a 12' travel lane and a 9' parking zone • Add three street trees spaced 30' apart wl tree grates • Add two City-standard period lights Preliminary Cost • Approximately 400 square feet of additional paving @ $50/ LF $20,000 • Three street trees @ $500 EA $1,500 • Three tree grates @ $400 EA $1,200 • Two City-Standard Lights @ $3,000 EA $7,000 • Total preliminary Cost of additional work $29,700 Benefits • Enhanced pedestrian environment • New lighting will improve visibility and safety • Sidewalk expansion will benefit new retail businesses along Central Street and improve handicap access • Collaboration — City could use CDBG funding to match developer contribution 20 0 N�Cos-A REMOVE EXISTING VGC, MATCH NEW VGC TO EXISTING VGC. INSTALL HANDICAP RAMPS, INSTALL NEW CONCRETE SIDEWALK. ADJUST TWO WATER GATES AS GV" REQUIRED zp NSTALL VGC WITHIN ZOAD RIGHT OF WAY TO ROOSEVELVS 4ATCH EXISTING VGC IER CITY ]RESTAURANT FECIFICATIONS TYP. R-5' N/7 cLcv REALTY TRusr 200 DERBY STREET ASSESSOR*S MAP 35, LOT 259 DEED BOOK 13683. PACE 328 R -REMOVE EXISTING ASPHALT AND CONCRETE SIDEWALK. TR T�j INSTALL NEW CONCRETE (D SIDEWALK. INSTALL NEW VGC CURB TO MATCH EXISTING VGC (PER CITY '-BOLLARDS NEXT To F,P SPECIFICATIONS), EXISTING COLUMNS-,TYP. ADJUST GATE VALVE �-NO PARKING AREA BOXES AS REQUIRED (PAINTED ON CONC. PAVEMENT) OUTDOOR SEATING AREA ASPHALT "I'IN N.. ZIL INC CTR .11 INC 9CNI 5,oc 911, '.0 IN,cc ..93 0 $97 1. Cc C. :_glo yt a G'" cap"' 'NN' 920 10, ON m� I NI. 1 91Z IST S.50 IL. X 7. o 29 0M. IN 9 55 C NO STII�sN' 0 ON CC 'El 951, SOX .9 51 IN,I� I.N.11 895 9 24 GIR 9 cc 70M#1 95, D& all c C69, ll"�c DOL IEL lot I gc 415z;p s,rl AMMOIA 9 36 1,4 N� Iss \I .-" I .CC 1 1 ?X 9*4-0 91" IN Aw-f NE v2s 9 W14 76- 4 20 0 0 I cl 16 c�ubt. —REMOVE EXISTING VGC. MATCH NEW VGC TO EXISTING VGC, INSTALL HANDICAP RAMPS, TA INSTALL NEW CONCRETE (D SIDEWALK. ADJUST TWO WATER GATES AS Tf. REQUIRED N c ENO 0 qSTALL VGC WITHIN- - ROOSEVELT'S !OAD RIGHT OF WAY TO IATCH EXISTING VGC RESTAURANT 'ER CITY R-5- NIP CLCV REALTY TRUST PECIFICATIONS TYP. 300 DERBY STREET -R-5 AP/1 I N ASSESSOR'S MAP 35. LOT 259 DEED BOOK 13683. FACE 328 tI R-5'\ REMOVE EXISTING R -A ASPHALT AND CONCRETE SIDEWALK, INSTALL NEW CONCRETE OD SIDEWALK. INSTALL NEW VGC CURB TO MATCH c� I., EXISTING VGC (PER CITY BOLLARDS NEXT TO I INC SPECIFICATIONS), ADKJST GATE VALVE EXISTING COLUMNS-JYP. BOXES AS REQUIRED NO PARKING AREA OUMOOR SEATING AREA (PAINTED ON CONC. PAVEMENT) T' s 17 ASPHALT cl, ;D� 1.'JIL 2 .10 &C oNo SIC516 "I IL a.A. r. "I o0v p FtN 0 9 29 1 as,, &89 1p *OIL; EINH T'� F a �p 0 6N M KL ON &V 4�0 8." ft �oN� 9,55 LP 9, 62 cc . IN 1 IN Tamil D 'u 14 .11 lqc 922 97 INI cm 129 9� t .1 1, 'p 40 'I� REMOVE 01511144 %lK. MATCH NEW W 10 EXISTING VM 04MAJ HANDICAP RAMM INSTALL NEW (D \ =1 v SIDEWAIJK. ADAM WATER GAIT1111 At REQUWED Glo o7 U NSTALL VGC WITHIN ROOSEM" ZOAD RIGHT OF WAY TO RESTAURAft 4ATCH EXISTING VGC )ER CITY R-5' NIP cwv 0 ;PECIFICATIONS TYP. e,.bq 300 DERBY =,POO -R-5' ASSESSORS' kAF sw sn't DEED BOOK IM" R-5 tot R w*WALx. 6N co 1� LIP N a comM TE *%iALL NEW I0 MATCH GTR (KR aTy BOLLARDS NEXT TO V�LVE EXISTING COLUMNS TYP. WO AS KQLXRED NO PARKING AREA A,I� (PAINTED ON CONC. PAVEMENT) TOX #To 'c .20 9—7 m� .55 R12 'L ce 15, LOT POST & Z 11 PC SIR, ON RR I o R I �ee 0'ST 8 I� D.H "P ol SS, 5'- ';S. 04'6:�' IST MR q TO TO .......... el, AL OP GC 'TI 0 .6. �N mPL 71 1 OR c L 0 OTR I.CON� �5c Q.L IE' .1R OK 41 G -le \JP. THER ILI 0 'S' 4,9, Ill 0 51 '6 L .11 0 11 IR " . . I I REMOVE f W, MATCH NEW W. M EXISTING VCA,. *%Ifts HANDICAP RA&Q�,%, INSTALL NEW (Uotft it 0 SIDEWALK, AIIAAV ftti WATER GATt.% A% REOUIRED NSTALL VGC WITHIN ZOAD RIGHT OF WAY TO ROOSEVZLTII 4ATCH EXISTING VGC RESTAUROT )ER CITY R-5' NIP CICV AIA&W 14W ;PECIFICATIONS TYP. bg 300 DERBY xf"00 -R-5 ASSESSORS NA F AW DEED R-5'\ R i'7" 0- QIR coNCKTIE (D oo 141 ALL NEW WIN f0 MATCH Env" va (PER CITY -BOLLARDS NEXT TO EXISTING COLUMNS,TYP. ADJ:ff rkw Boxg *I= NO PARKING AREA OUVA" 'AAW" AREA (PAINTED ON CONC. PAVEMENT) U1 0000 9%Q po�, I,'ILI op�,.0 Ift (2)N1 10 'l 5.1 11, I'ILI' qc 9%Ill �7- 0 OTR 0 i�,j,� 14 4.p, 00 119 1. TBL411 TFl 0 Ir jgy"v2"I I .. GIR -4 MPL Ll 0 (D " - '11 , -4 AUA% A ln� REMOVE EXISTING VC MATCH NEW VOC TO EXISTING VGC, INSTA HANDICAP RAMPS, INSTALL NEW CONCR SIDEWALK, ADJUST 7 WATER GATES AS REQUIRED Jocus /F ONE ENGINE HOUSE REALTY TRUST INSTALL VGC WITHIN v LAFAYETTE STREET SSESSOR'S JVAP 34. LOT 485 ROAD RIGHT OF WAY TO (D ROOSEI �E'D BOOK 17899. PACE 181 MATCH EXISTING VGC: RESTAI LA V BOOK 207� PLAN 22 �CUS AREA O.48-±ACRES PER CITY SPECIFICATIONS TYP. \R=5' NIF CLCV REAZ 300 DERBY STA R=5' ASSESSOR'S M� DEED BOOK 136, R=5 R R=10'- BOLLARDS NEXT TO EXISTING COLUMNS TYP. E NO PARKING AREA R-2' (PAINTED ON CONC. PAVEMENT) TRANSITION VGC 'VGC FLUSH NTH CONCRETE PAVEMENT =9.65 AND CONCRETE WALK ANSMON VGC: lb � NEW NLG METER )NE PARKING WHERE THE G CURB CUT REFORE THE IOSS IS JUST 'ARKING � ALONG ETTE ST+ it Fri; oat DERBY LOFTS CONDOMINIUMS Salem, Massachusetts 44ft Existing Salem Laundry Buildings DERBY LOFTS CONDOMINIUMS Salem, Massachusetts lima ig, 46 r lb" r Perspective View from Lafayette and Derby Streets in Context DERBY LOFTS CONDOMINIUMS Salem, Massachusetts -T� IL Perspective View from Derby Street in Context IMM 'FAA milli oil WINTER STREET ARCHITECTS , INC . E- L) ---------------- HH n. HH n MHI I 'F I --i! I --TIEJ HFI q-1 -IF- J all]-],ld 1H LL—Ll I 0 0 0 .0 >b South Elevation Scale; 1/8' V-0, LU CL 16 0 . . . . . ELI > LU 6 0 1 z 4 0 U) OL uj 0 4' 16 A4.1 Kev Plan bmm=ml� Fni . I-----T------I I T4 . X I Li L-i L-i BE HLI HHH Lb E- I F-1, �11 1 1-1 I V I PJ 1 1. ];-;H— i F-1 ME% I'M rg, 0 00 J J) .0 East Devotion Scale: 1/8' '-0' 8 LU LU > ui 0 OL ui 0 Ir 9 16 0 A4.2 Key Plan I 6=mmmi U Uu u U 04 T7F I... I LA 41 41 I 4F 11 I -0 d IS 00 � -J .J 2 8 0) CD North Elevation EM EM z w 16! 0 -i �Z . . . . . LLI > LU cl M U) w 0 4 6 16 0 A4.3 Key Plan I b�l En C4 L) - FIN W : MEL HF� Frii PPPP ECK c _j 0 C j ) A o o -i -j �E 8 >. f - f -e Ci i OD OD /'i',\ West Devotion Southwest Devotion K�)Scale: 1/8' 1'-0* ScoW 1/8' 1'-0* LLI 0 ul > LU C3 z i6 u.' A4.0 Key Plan 6�m