Loading...
132 & 144 ESSEX STREET, AND 2 NEW LIBERTY STREET- ESSEX BLOCK PEABODY ESSEX MUSEUM SPR - --- fssex SY-, AN fs_ek'4- a-yLd ,;2 17eW L-he;-N Jf f' r t .r- � r -Al. ------------ Cecil & Rizvi .ea s 376 Boylston Street Boston, MA 02116 Telephone: 617-267-9090 Telefax 617-267-9096 .' _ M®IR:OPl A400A1P1.Q1C . smalwa y..m. . YaMDOt0.'®.@lOMm(V1C ------- ------------------------- --------------- Peabody, _____ _______________ -- ________ - Ps.weaubosdys=_ Essex X i "^—aa PLUMMER/ DALAND LIBRARY ' — \ — - --- -- — — -------\ \----- /---- PU6tWNG pp 12/L.lf� _. ° ° ak x ROOF PLAN -. Oe�ae1 Wn. nrz P�� OGTy1 ' .InV Mumer A-225 i Cecil & Rizvi Pfi Boylston Street Boston. MA 02116 iebceane: 617-267-9090 ie Oln 60-261-9098 V®IdlOPl A40OA1Y1,B1C . .. su..wmPVF.. y . VANBBiM1ffi LVOpPPPI.S P1C I \�- -------------------------- _ Peabody Essex H U M i i _ felfl Y.If.CYV3[113 I _ I i i CIWLP - lig I J J - I - it - av � PLUMMER/ DALAND LIBRARY I I J - - / \--, Q a e95,11 ROOF PLAN - - xa... yr-I•a _COQ ' " Pe-n eR A-225 Cecil & Rizvi ])6 Boylston Street Boston, MA 02116 Telephone:612-262-9090 Tel 1— 6i9-069-9096 .. � � 1Y®IL60B ASOO.IIT;B1C u.e.es 6.er— Peabody Essex e.u...ee..epet�te _ . 1 twrw>a CIP i� PLUMMER/ DALAND LIBRARY __ JE I _ _ _ ______ _ _ ______ _ ________ _ _________ ROOF PLAN m.hb e w QQ�\rye. • A-225 _..- _....... _.__ . _ Cecil & Rizvi 376eov�xton Street aoston, NA 02116 Telephone:611-261-9090 Ttlefox 611-261-9096 " emlew.a 6a.n— .. Y.U6IPYM'en Q1. Q!C -. I� Peabody FSSC% e.nua euww DF- ' wLaM \_ _� Rr�roa _ ________ ------_____ ,gam DALAND pe,nnnonloe. / LIBRARY --- --- ----- -------- ° _ ------ ---- - 41 ROOF PLAN Del 1 M.mE M7[ �x1 <.. e, pe QP�.\ti na D..—On A-225 _ I Cecil & Rizvi 376 Boylston Street Boston, MA 02116 Telephone: 611-267-3090 Teel- 617-261-MB . BM 00 MBOOCI Tm INC . VMM00t0. MO OIC uenmeu E,0 Peabody, Essex e-e�Ke oo- Lo,op,m Ifee- PLUMMER/ g ^' DALAND n. LIBRARY zn �,. �PLMW4ML 40. X12/Y/fi, ---------- ---------------------- \ o I ROOF PLAN —of ane _G1 p2 PA A-225 (lite of c ttlEztT, itt s chzi�E## 3 ' Planning �3attrb One �$tt1em (16reen To the Assessor ' s Office: , The Salem Planning Bo�rd is re u itinq crti ' ed abutters s list for the property of: �` �[ct��u� ` lVq F sem " f�•F.Lt) L�her�--j � — The Public Hearing date is tentatively set for I�IDv 7` I We would appreciate receiving this list two weeks prior to the Public Hearing date. Thank ,\ / Planning Board EX\DH\REQUABUT CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS PLANNING DEPARTMENT PATRICK REFFETT ONE SALEM GREEN City Planner 01970 (978)745-9595 Ext. 311 Fax (978)740-0404 MEMORANDUM TO: Ms. Mary Zappas Ms. Donna Lee Caramello FROM: Don Cefalo, Senior Planner CC: PatrickReffett, City Planner r Mayor Stanley Usovicz, Jr. DATE: January 17, 2001 RE: Peabody Essex Museum Expansion/Essex Street In regards to your concerns related to the expansion of the Peabody Essex Museum and the proposed roadway improvements to Essex Street. Patrick Reffett (City Planner) has asked me to compile and provide to you information that may answer any questions you may have. The following information is enclosed: • Certificated Abutter List. • Legal Advertisement/Abutters Notification. • Planning Board Site Plan Review Decision, October 19, 2000. • Memorandum of Understanding (City of Salem/Peabody Essex Museum). • Transportation Assessment "Peabody Essex Museum Expansion, May 2000", Prepared by Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. • Traffic Management Plan, Peabody Essex Museum Expansion Project, Salem Massachusetts, August 11, 2000. • Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc., Traffic Circulation Alternatives, August 7, 2000. • Letter from Patrick Reffett to Residents and Business Owners, December 22, 2000 and list of recipients. • Salem City Council, Discontinuance of a Street Decision(Liberty Street), March 3, 1999 • Special Meeting Minutes, Salem City Council, #240—Discontinuance of Liberty Street as a Public Way, April 7, 1999. • Salem Planning Board Meeting Minutes—July 6, 2000, July 20, 2000, September 7, 2000, September 21, 2000, October 5, 2000 and October 19, 2000. If you have any further questions or concerns, please contact me at 745-9595 x 311. rt ; APRIL 7, 1999 9-3 SPECIAL MEETING brought up points regarding the statutory wording of the hearing notice. Attorney Gelineau requests that a letter he sent to the council be made a matter of record. Attorney Philip Strome, represents Russell Kiernan of Essex Street. Mr. Kiernan•s garage, house, and business is a direct abutter to Liberty Street. No one has made a serious effort to undertake his interests as an abutter. Alicia Hart, 47 Washington Square, stated that small streets are needed to keep cities safer. The City is responding in a way that we are held hostage. James Shea, 45 Dearborn St., the taxpayers should not subsidize the Museum. This will block off visitors at the parking garage and visitor center. Tim Shea, owner of the Wax Museum, Derby street, stated that it unfair the way we are being treated on Derby .Street. our pedestrian traffic is being blocked off. Shawn Shea, Wax Museum, is in favor of the expansion, but we are against the plan on the table, the discontinuance of Liberty street. Mike Shea, Wax Museum, stated that in 1995 the expansion planwas33,000 square feet and they were not taking Liberty street.. Now the plan is.reduced but they are taking Liberty Street and the charter Street lot. I do not support the abandonment. Richard Moore of Lafayette Street, we cannot afford to pay any more taxes. Would like to see the Museum come forward and be a real partner. Councillor Harvey moved that the hearing be closed. it was so voted. councillor Hayes moved that the city Solicitor be requested to compile the relevant information from the record presented at the public hearing in order that findings of fact may be determined by the City council regarding the discontinuance of Liberty Street. It was so voted. on the motion of Councillor Flynn the meeting adjourned at 8:00 PM. APRIL 7. 1999 SPECIAL MEETING ATTEST: DEBORAH E. BURKINSNAW CITY CLERK APRIL 7. 1999 SPECIAL MEETING Lt. Charles Latulippe, Salem Fire Department, stated that the discontinuance will not affect the Fire Department response to the area. He supports the discontinuance. The comments of Mr. Bornstein, Capt. Callahan, and Lt. Latullippe were submitted in writing for the record. Attorney serafini further stated that the Museum engaged Traffic Engineers, VHB, for a transportation analysis. David Cleary, Traffic Engineer, vHB stated that they looked at the impact of closing the street to traffic as well as to pedestrians. We looked during various times of the year. we looked at the impact of closing the street. Liberty Street is considered a local street. It carries approximately 300 cars during peek hours. We looked at the impact of people approaching from the south. This closing would enhance pedestrian traffic in this area. . .Enhanced signage will direct pedestrians to the area. Attorney serafini called upon the city. Planner to speak regarding the Traffic study. Craig wheeler stated that he has received this report and his conclusion is that traffic and pedestrians will not be negatively impacted by this closing. Mr. wheeler also read a letter from Mayor osovicz to be entered into the record supporting the discontinuance of Liberty Street. Attorney serafini stated that there is no adverse traffic impact by this closing and pedestrian access will be enhanced. With a world class museum you will get people who will add to the character of the city. Also appearing in favor: James Gilbert, 10 Turner St., who stated that we need this type of tourism. Tom O'Neill, Director of the House of Seven Gables believes this will have a positive effect. Dick Pabich, Salem Inn on Summer street, believes that this should go forward. Tim Clark, President of Historic Salem, Inc. is in favor to APRIL 7, 1999 c SPECIAL MEETING allow the expansion of the Museum but asks Museum to make their time table public. There should be no expiration of public access it should be permanent. He questioned the walkway and landscaping. Tim Jenkins, 343 Essex Street had questions regarding pedestrian and vehicular traffic. Steve Kesselman, Director of the Maritime Site, we don't anticipate any negative impacts. Meg Twohey, Federal Street has strong support but has concerns for the armory and access during construction because this is vitally important to Derby Street businesses. Annie Harris, 28 Chestnut Street and Salem Partnership, has reviewed the plans and is very supportive of the Museum's plans. Staley McDermott, 30 Dearborn St., stated that he was in favor of expansion and closing of Liberty street but it is not an insignificant cost. Russ Vickers, 15 Beach Avenue, is in favor of discontinuance and Museum expansion plans. Campbell Sears, 22 Beach Ave., would like to see the project go forward. William Burns, Beckford street is also in favor of closing of Liberty street but would. like to link it to the preservation of the armory facade. Also appearing in favor of the discontinuance were Ellen DiGerinomo, 11 Church St., Executive Director of the Salem Chamber of Commerce, Dolores Jordan, 97 Derby St., William Tinti, 16 Beckford St. ,and Charlie Newhall, Daniel St. Those appearing in opposition were: Larry Kindler, 27 Charter St., who is concerned by the closing of the street, loss of parking, and the inability to get around. There is a need for a clear unobstructed access to downtown. Terry Kalgren of 10 Boardman St., doesn't want to see this at the cost of the residents. Attorney Roy Gelineau, who represents the Derby Street Businesses, asked that the Council look at the impact of the closing on the residents and one problem i s that the Museum is not open the same hours businesses. p P as other businesses and access will be denied. Attorney Gelineau APRIL 7, 1999 ^� SPECIAL MEETING A special Meeting of the city council was held in the Council chamber on Wednesday, April 7, 1999 at 6:00 P. M. for the purpose of holding a Public Hearing and taking action on the Discontinuance of Liberty Street. Notice of this meeting was posted on March 12, 1999 at 11:54 A. M. , and advertised in the Salem Evening News on March 17, 24, and 31, 1999. All Councillors were present. council President Leonard F. O'Leary presided. councillor Blair moved to dispense with the reading of the record of the previous meeting. 4240 - DISCONTINUANCE OF LIBERTY STREET AS A PUBLIC WAY A hearing was held on the order for the discontinuance of Liberty Street. council President O'Leary advised the audience that two (2) stenographers were present and recording the meeting. . President O'Leary then called upon Mayor Usovicz who addressed the . council and Audience. Mayor Usovicz thanked the council for taking this matter up in a timely way. He advised that the Memorandum of understanding was approved by a unanimous 11-0 roll call vote of the council. He stated that everyone recognizes the ability to elevate the city but our commitment is to the Memorandum of Understanding. We have an opportunity to enhance our future and what this project means to the city as a whole. The Memorandum of Understanding is etched in stone and is a commitment and a bond. President O'Leary recognized Attorney John Serafini who is representing the Peabody Essex Museum. Attorney Serafini stated that we are proceeding with actions taken by the city previously. We are following the same procedures set up by the City, and Massachusetts r General Laws. All the structural parts are in accordance with the , 96 APRIL 7, 1999 SPECIAL MEETING ' city and State requirements. Much has been said regarding the importance of the project. We must now take the next step. Regarding the Memorandum of Understanding. The Museum went ahead with plans and it required the discontinuance of Liberty Street. We will be finalizing plans with the proper permitting agencies of the City. We will file with the Planning Board regarding a site plan review, which requires very detailed statements and applications. There will be further public hearings, and notices with ample opportunities to have concerns addressed and inquiries answered. What we are concerned about tonight is the taking of Liberty Street. Attorney Serafini then turned comments over to John Parker, President of the Museums Board of Trustees. He stated that the Museum as a whole, were enthusiastic about the plans laid out in the Memorandum of Understanding. We felt we have established a partnership with the City. It is this partnership that is important. we have renovated and built the Park Visitor Center. We have refurbished the Library, which is beautiful. we have built storage facilities that are climate controlled to protect our exhibits. We have moved ahead in a major way. It will be an attractive addition which will enhance the city. We have received feed back and made modifications. We have made further refinements. The expansion will allow us to showcase Salem's dramatic heritage. We look forward to continuing this partnership. Mr. Stanley Bornstein, City Engineer spoke regarding the plan on file, which shows the discontinuance of Liberty Street. There are several utilities and we are not sure whether we will leave these or not. Captain Robert Callahan, Salem Police Traffic Department, said he reviewed the plan and in his opinion the discontinuance will not hamper police protection. National Park Service Visitor Center Mr. Russell Kiernan The Crypt Cafe New Liberty Street 137 Essex Street 121 Essex Street Salem, MA 01970 Salem, MA 01970 Salem, MA 01970 Saccon Jewelers & R. A. Difillipo Antiques Karyn Bailey Essex Street Realty Trust 131 Essex Street 131 Essex Street, 434 131 Essex Street Salem, MA 01970 Salem, MA 01970 Salem, MA 01970 Leigh Ann Moroney Eva Sharp Ryan Tetterton 131 Essex Street, #32 131 Essex Street, 922 131 Essex Street, #33 Salem, MA 01970 Salem, MA 01970 Salem, MA 01970 James Ubry Fr. Mathews Trust Mary Zappas 131 Essex Street, #31 C/o Gregory Kelly 129 Essex Street, Unit 3 129 Essex Street Unit 6 Salem, MA 01970 Salem, MA 01970 Salem, MA 01970 Alicia Hart Daniel Barton Stacey Simpson 129 Essex Street, Unit 4 129 Essex Street, Unit 7 129 Essex Street, Unit 1 Salem, MA 01970 Salem, MA 01970 Salem, MA 01970 Amy Leroux Patrick Wrynn Marta Morris Flanagan 129 Essex Street, Unit 9 129 Essex Street,Unit 12 129 Essex Street, Unit 5 Salem, MA 01970 Salem, MA 01970 Salem, MA 01970 Margo Simon Sara Carr Richard Warren Lyman, III 129 Essex Street, Unit 11 129 Essex Street, Unit 13 129 Essex Street, Unit 8 Salem, MA 01970 Salem, MA 01970 Salem, MA 01970 Donna Lee Carmello The Essex Street Trust Market Square Realty LLC 129 Essex Street, Unit 2 129 Essex Street, Unit 10 127 Essex Street Salem, MA 01970 Salem, MA 01970 Salem, MA 01970 Beautiful Things Bang Boom The Fools Mansion 127 Essex Street 127 Essex Street 127 Essex Street Salem, MA 01970 Salem, MA 01970 Salem, MA 01970 Grand Turk Realty LLC Crow Haven Corner Pioneer Realty Trust 125 Essex Street 125 Essex Street 121 Essex Street Salem, MA 01970 Salem, MA 01970 Salem, MA 01970 CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS PLANNING DEPARTMENT PATRICK REFFETT ONE SALEM GREEN City Planner 01970 (978)745-9595 EM. 311 Fax (978)740-0404 December 22, 2000 Dear Resident/Business Owner: As you know,the Peabody Essex Museum has begun its$65 million expansion plan. In conjunction with these plans,there are proposed changes to the section of the Essex Street roadway between New Liberty Street and Hawthorne Boulevard. In order to keep you apprised of the proposed reconfiguration, I would like to invite you to meet with me so that I may explain the details of plan. Please contact my Executive Assistant, Ellen Dubinsky at(978) 745-9595, ext. 311 to schedule a time that is convenient for me to talk with you. I wish you a safe and happy holiday season and look forward to meeting you. Sincerely, E�Patrick Reffett City Planner cc: Mayor Stanley J.Usovicz,Jr. Councillor Regina Flynn +;" *"f � 4 0, Traffic To and From Beverly dip N°�., �;� °" '> , a WinterStreet- Rout@'1A Traffic To and From Route 114 " / Bridge Street-Route.107 p �f r i;� 3-.. ," '� o I• ff"�' ,n, m� ,p• Q r® jOY ,1+ i • .•� , ,,, I was, . . II ,,, .� � ` ,,,^ i �°•'"tib ;>, w- _ � p Essex Street- One Way I Hawthorne Blvd. - Route 1A •. ;,, „ �, wT =w New Liberty Street I .. , _` •, •.� •i •.. ,.,,, +� I I I '•� Lf d ,y,. SII Summer Street- Route 114 ,• 4 Project Site •w •„•"•, � w t• tllbu C' ,M N r �' , •-•..�-' n i,••(•r It •w � Y Ira ;^ a i ;• "' a Chart Street o i a .� -� Public Parking 3i. s "• Truck Queuing &Staging Garage v, « ' • �, { � °"� Turner Construction Company Derby Street- Route 1A :" Peabody Essex Museum Phase 2 ,`•. Construction Traffic Plan rl Norman Street- Route 114 I er 6 :, 111 New Derby Street- Route 114 I �� «,a By: wTW TSK-LOG-9 �Il Rev 2 -8/16/00 Peabody Essex Museum Ph. 2 August 11, 2000 • Project No. d) Stone for new Stone walls(six to ten deliveries of stone, plus weekly deliveries of mortar materials for approx.four weeks). e) Multiple fence relocations as required, f) Landscaping trees and plants(weekly deliveries of plant materials,loam, mulch,etc.). 15. Yin Yu Tang House Construction: (December 2001 through March 2003) a) Foundation,(December 2001 through February 2002)Deliveries will be as follows: 1) Excavation(one week of ten trucks per day). 2) Concrete—(six weeks of one to five trucks per day). 3) Backfill at end(one week of six to eight trucks per day). b) Yin Yu Tang Gallery-Installation will take approximately one year beginning in February 2002. Multiple deliveries of materials will be made on an inconsistent basis. There will be periods of multiple daily deliveries followed by days or weeks with little to no deliveries. Proiect Personnel Turner's Construction Project Manager will be Mr.Bill Wright. He will be on site and will be the City's contact person for permit issues on this project. The City may also contact Turner's Project Executive,Mr. Robert Turner,with any concerns or problems. Nap 5 Peabody Essex Museum Ph. 2 August 11, 2000 Project No. 8. Roofing: (June 2001 through November 200 1) a) In the first month,there will be daily deliveries of plywood,insulation, and roofing materials. b) In the 2nd two months,there will be weekly deliveries of misc.roofing materials including Lead Coated Copper Panels. 9. ElectricaL Plumbing Mechanical and Fire Protection: a) Central Plant Renovations: (November 2000 through October 2001). Major deliveries of Cooling Tower,Boiler,Chiller—one delivery for each major component. Plus one delivery every other week of supporting equipment and materials. b) New Building Construction: (June 2001 through January 2002) There will be uniform deliveries for each trade as follows: 1) Mechanical Four deliveries per week 2) Electrical Two deliveries per week 3) Plumbing One delivery per week 4) Fire Protection One delivery per week c) New Building Construction: (February 2002 through July 2002) There will be two to three deliveries to the jobsite each week for the MEP trades. 10. Interior Rough-In: (June 2001 through April 2002) a) Metal Stud and exterior Sheathing(averaging one delivery per week). b) Misc.metals and stairs(averaging one delivery per week). c) Dumpster deliveries and removals(one per week). 11. Interior Finishes: (November 2001 through October 2002) a) Plywood and gypsum wall board materials(two deliveries per week). b) November 2001 through May 2002 will involve many finish trades making three to five small deliveries per day. c) Wood flooring deliveries(six bulk deliveries)in December through February. d) Granite flooring deliveries(eight bulk deliveries)in May through July. e) Dumpster deliveries and removals(one per day). 12. Interior Renovations to existing Museum Galleries: (December 2000 through Sept.2002) a) There will be multiple phases to the renovations to the existing Museum Spaces. Each phase will involve a cycle of selective demolition,interior rough-in and finishes. This work will result in an average of two to three deliveries per week. b) Dumpster deliveries and removals(two per week). 13. Sitework at ArmoU Park: (April 2001 through October 200 1) a) Fence and Jersey barrier installation. b) Site demolition and excavation. Two week period of one to five trucks per day. c) Rough grading(one truck per day for one week). d) New granite curbing(one delivery of curbing,plus three concrete deliveries. e) Misc. Concrete(five concrete deliveries). 0 Sidewalks (five loads of materials). g) Landscaping: (Two week period of one load of material daily). h) Dumpster deliveries and removals(one every two weeks). 14. Final Sitework at Essex New Liberty and Charter Streets.and the new Public Garden connecting Essex and Charter Street: (April 2002 through October 2002) a) Granite Curb and installations(four to six deliveries). - b) Misc. Concrete items(ten Truck deliveries). c) New Sidewalks(weekly deliveries of brick,concrete trucks, sand, cement). poor 4 Peabody Essex Museum Ph. 2 August 11, 2000 Project No. 1. Enabling Activities: (October 2000 through December 2000) a) Demolition of 133 Essex Street,the Empire Building. b) Relocation of 10 Liberty Street and 42 Charter Street to their new locations on the east end of Charter Street. c) Construction of a temporary pedestrian walkway connecting Essex Street and Charter Street. d) Construction of the new parking lot on Charter Street(behind 131 Essex Street). e) Cutting and capping of utilities on Liberty Street(by the City of Salem) f) Salvage of curbing,and fight poles,and removal of sidewalks(by the City of Salem). 2. Site Preparation: (December 2000 through January 2001) a) Perimeter site fencing and jersey barriers installed. b) Pedestrian access between Essex Street and Charter Street is relocated to the temporary pedestrian walkway. c) Installation of perimeter soldier piles and lagging on Essex Street and Charter Street sides of the site. d) Daily removal of excavated soil material from the site. 3. Foundation: (January 2000 through June 200 1) a) Bi-weekly deliveries of reinforcing Steel. b) Bi-weekly deliveries of misc.forming materials. c) Concrete pumps to place concrete(one pump every day,with a 2Ad pump every 3rd day) d) Daily concrete deliveries to the site e) Dumpster delivery and removal from the site(approx.two per week). 4. Structural Steel: (April 2001 to September 2001) a) 120 ton crane will be delivered to the site b) Structural steel deliveries will average two to three loads per day. c) Daily welder's equipment shipments. d) Weekly delivery of Spray-on-Fireproofing materials. 5. Concrete Deck Fill&Finish: (May 2001 through August 2001) a) Slab reinforcing and mesh deliveries(six to eight loads total). b) Concrete pumps to place decks(one pour every three to four days). c) Concrete pour days will average six to ten trucks. d) Dumpster delivery and removal from the site(two per week). 6. Exterior Masonry.Precast. and Stone walls: (May 2001 through November 200 1) a) In the first month there will be daily deliveries of staging,brick,limestone, sand,block,and mise.materials(averaging two per day). b) In the middle months there will a daily delivery of block, sand,cement,brick,precast or stone(approximately one load per day). c) October will consist primarily of masonry cleaning and staging removal,(averaging two trucks per week). d) In July and August,there will be a weekly delivery of window framing and glass components. e) Dumpster delivery and removal from the site(two per week). 7. Skylights: (June 2001 through January 2002: a) 150 ton crane will be delivered to the site. b) Steel deliveries will average two to three loads per day. c) Beginning in August, skylight frame delivery will average three loads per week. d) Beginning in September,glass delivery will average two per week. PAOP R Peabody Essex Museum Ph. 2 August 11,2000 Project No. • New curbs,sidewalk and street surfacing on Essex Street and New Liberty Street and new curb and sidewalk on Charter Street next to the new construction. General Procurement Information in our procurement process,we will specifically require every subcontractor to comply with the Traffic Management Plan both contractually and through a formal operational review process in which we evaluate their particular operational requirements. In addition, each subcontractor who requires occupational permits will coordinate those requirements with the project superintendent prior to application for those permits. Saecial Conditions 1. Police details will be provided for street work construction as necessary. 2. Proper signage as required by the Traffic and Police departments will be provided. 3. Roads and sidewalks will be kept free of construction debris,dust and dirt caused by demolition and construction. Mechanical sweeping will be performed during excavation on a daily basis. After the excavation phase additional street sweeping will be performed on an as needed basis as directed by the City of Salem. 4. The public will be separated from the construction sites by construction fencing consisting of a 6 foot high chain link fence,and some concrete jersey barriers. 5. Street utility work will be carefully coordinated with the City of Salem. The Salem Fire Department and Police Departments will be notified in advance. All possible ways of keeping fire lanes open will be a priority. 6. Construction worker parking will not be allowed on the site. All subcontractors will be encouraged to have their employees use public transportation. 7. All construction materials will be stored within the site construction fence. All work required outside the fence will be scheduled with the City of Salem Police Department and abutters. 8. Queuing of trucks will be allowed only on Charter Street between Central Street and Hawthorne Boulevard,as shown on Construction Traffic Plan,TSK-LOG-9,dated 3/24/00. 9. Snow will be removed around the perimeter of the site to keep temporary walkways open for pedestrians, and roadways passable for vehicles. 10. Deliveries to the jobsite will be held to a minimum for the 5 days prior to and the day of Halloween,October 31,of each year. Construction Vehicle Routing Construction Traffic Plan TSK-LOG-9(attached),shows the traffic routing that the subcontractors, suppliers,vendors, etc.will be required to follow when delivering materials to the project site. Deliveries will be made generally via Routes 114 or IA to Derby Street then to Hawthorne Street then to Charter Street. Alternatively,deliveries may approach the site from the north by taking Bridge Street to Winter Street to Hawthorne Street to Charter Street. In either case,if any trucks need to queue up while waiting to enter the project site,it will be done on Charter Street between Lafayette Street and Hawthorne Blvd. A limited amount of Truck traffic will approach the project site via Essex Street in order to service those construction activities associated with the new Main Essex Street entrance to the Museum,and with the sitework on Essex Street and the new Armory Park. Construction Schedule and Deliveries The following significant events,trucking and deliveries are anticipated during the ccurse of the project,all dates are approximate: Poor� Peabody Essex Museum Ph. 2 August 11, 2000 Project No. Traffic Management Plan Peabody Essex Museum Expansion Proiect Salem, Massachusetts This Traffic Management plan has been created to address the traffic impact to the City of Salem during the construction of the Peabody Essex Museum Expansion Project. Table of Contents Project Description Page 1 General Procurement Information Page 2 Special Conditions Page 2 Construction Vehicle Routing Page 2 Construction Schedule Deliveries Page 3 Project Personnel Page 5 Construction Traffic Plan,TSK-LOG-9 Page 6 Proiect Description The Peabody Essex Museum proposes to construct an addition to their existing"Liberty Block"building campus located on the land currently occupied by Liberty Street and several pieces of property located near the comer of Liberty Street and Charter Street and continuing East on Charter Street(see drawing TSK- LOG-9,attached). The Project includes the following components: • Demolition of the existing Empire Building located at 133 Essex Street and construction of a new landscaped Public Garden connecting Essex Street and Charter Street with a pedestrian walkway. • Relocation of the 3 story brick building now located at 42 Charter Street to a new location on Charter Street approximately 380 feet east of it's present location. • Relocation of the 3 story brick building now located at 10 Liberty Street to a new location on Charter Street approximately 250 feet east of it's present location. • Relocation of the one story wood structure now located on the comer of Charter Street and Liberty Street to a new location on Peabody Essex Museum property on the south side of Charter Street next to the Samuel Pickman House. • Demolition of the Saltonstall Building at the Peabody Essex Museum's Liberty block campus. • Construction of a new addition to the existing Peabody Essex Museum,consisting of new museum galleries, a new 191 seat auditorium,and an interior"courtyard" space that can be used for group events. This"courtyard space" consists of a long interior 3 story"pedestrian corridor"connecting the Museum's new main entrances on Essex Street and Charter Street, and a large interior courtyard to one side. The new building will be two to three stories high with the courtyard area and long central corridor covered by a large glass skylight. Mechanical Spaces will be located in the basement of the new building. The exterior of the new building will be predominantly Brick masonry,with some Granite cladding. • Renovations to the Museum's existing Central Plant Building located on Charter street, including new heating,cooling and electrical power equipment. • Foundation for the Yin Yu Tang House, an 18"century Chinese house that will be constructed on this foundation. • Selective renovation of existing gallery and storage spaces in the existing Peabody Essex - Museum's Liberty Block Campus. • Construction of a new park in the space located next to the National Park Service on the comer of New Liberty Street and Essex Street. PAae 7 11)Provide annual financial support for two full-time Museum security positions when the Museum opens its newly expanded facilities to help support increased costs associated with the pedestrian walkway on former Liberty Street until 23 September, 2007, at which time the provision will be subject to renegotiations, as set forth in item 112 of this agreement In return, the Museum will provide free general admission for all Salem residents. Dated this day of September, 1997 City,of Salem by its Mayor, duly authorized Neil J. Harrington, Mayor Pea y Essex Museum by the President of the Board of Trustees, John O. Parker, President of the Board of Trustees Peabo � Essex Museu by the Director and Chief Executive Officer f Dan L. onroe, Director and Chief Executive Officer Salem City Council, by its President, duly authorized by vote of the City Council Scott McLaughlin, President of Ci Council process that requires the involvement of many concerned parties and a process that requires a determination of the role of these assets in Phase 11 expansion—the City will support the Museum's ultimate decisions. In addition to supporting the Museum at the local level, at the Museum's request, the City will participate in support of the Museum's position in any approval, permitting, or review process that the Museum goes through with regard to the Phase II project at the state or federal level. The processes in which the City's support may be requested may include (but not necessarily be limited to) the Section 106 process under the National Historic Preservation Act and the Massachusetts Historical Commission and MEPA processes at the state level. 6) Waive any special requirement by the City of Salem to conduct environmental impact statements in excess of those required by the State of Massachusetts 7) Provide financial support equal to the Museum's investment necessary to establish a Business Improvement District for downtown Salem and assure that the Museum will have representation on the governing body of the BID. 8) Provide, by working with the parking authority, a special, reduced fee schedule for Museum patrons and staff parking in recognition of the Museum's financial participation in construction of the Church Street parking structure. 9) Waive all relevant fees for ail building permit applications, including but not limited to plumbing, building, electrical, fire inspection, SRA, Planning Board, and other City agencies. 10)Provide infrastructure improvements to facilitate Phase II expansion, including but not limited to: a) Construction of an exterior, all hours pedestrian walkway between Liberty Street and Charter Street b) Removal of all trees, curbing, sidewalk, and lighting on Liberty Street. The timing of such removal will be coordinated with the Museum. c) The City will also remove parking meters, curbing, etc. from the Empire parking lot and assist in the removal and relocation of any City utility , lines in Liberty Street. 7) Contribute$300,000 to the City of Salem to help construct a parking deck on Church Street, payments to be made over a twenty year period in the amount of$15,000 a year commencing upon the date of the first bond payment made by the City of Salem for its new Church Street parking structure. 8) Assure that the design for the Armory Headhouse lot will include an appropriate commemoration of Salem's Second Corps Cadets. II. In consideration for the above, the City of Salem agrees to: 1) Take all necessary steps to undertake and complete the sale of the Empire Parking lot to the Peabody Essex Museum prior to 1 January, 1998 and transfer clear and unencumbered title to the Empire Parking lot from the City of Salem to the Museum upon 45 days prior notice by the Museum. Until such time as the Museum requests transfer of title, and demonstrates need to use the parking lot for Phase 11 construction, the City of Salem will continue to operate and be liable for the Empire Parking lot. The Mayor of Salem will execute.an appropriate deed transferring title, which deed shall be held in escrow by the Mayor until such time as the Peabody Essex Museum requests delivery of said deed. The Museum will have the option of accepting title with an incumberance if it so chooses, with an appropriate adjustment in the purchase price. 2) To diligently take all steps necessary to abandon Liberty Street in order to deed it to the Peabody Essex Museum prior to 1 January 1998. The Mayor of Salem will execute an appropriate deed transferring title, which deed shall be held in escrow by the Mayor until such time as the Peabody Essex Museum needs Liberty Street for Phase H expansion and requests delivery of said deed. Within 45 days of receipt of a request by the Museum to transfer title of Liberty Street to the Museum, the City will deliver the quitclaim deed to said Liberty Street to the Museum. until the Street is deeded, and the &-0.4 . delivered, to the Museum, the City will retain ownership, responsibility and liability for operation of Liberty Street 3) Dedicate the proceeds of the sale of the Empire Parking lot to help complete design and construction of a parking structure over the existing Church Street parking lot 4) Provide a comprehensive and expedited City approval and permitting process involving all relevant City permitting and licensing agencies to facilitate Phase 11 Museum expansion design and construction. 5) Agree that when the Museum concludes its analysis of options with respect to the building at 10 Liberty Street and the Armory Headhouse Faeade—a In that event, the City will have the right to request the return of all or any portion of the property; if the City exercises that right, the Museum will convey the property requested and the City will return to the Museum any funds paid to the City of Salem for the Empire parking lot. 2) Maintain free, interior or exterior pedestrian pathway between Essex Street and Charter Street through Museum property or facilities on a line similar to that of present Liberty Street during Museum open hours until 23 September, 2007, except such time as the Museum is preparing for or engaged in construction of facilities at this location. After 23 September, 2007, the City of Salem and the Museum will review the question and, without obligation on the Museum, may renew or renegotiate such access. 3) Provide for an alternate, all-hours, exterior pedestrian walkway between Essex Street and Charter Street- 4) treet4) Invest$20,000 a year for 5 years in a Business Improvement District dedicated to the enhancement of downtown Salem. 5) Continue to provide at least$65,000 annually in free services to the City of Salem, which include but are not limited to: a) Free general admission to the Museum for all children who reside in Salem and students enrolled in Salem education institutions b) At least one day a month of free admission to all Salem residents until the Museum expands its facilities at Liberty Street c) Education services and programs provided to Salem students. and d) Provide new services to the Ci y by making use of Museum facilities available for special City of Salem events or activities, at cost or free, subject to Museum policies regarding facility use. e) After the Museum expands its Liberty Street facilities, all Salem residents will be provided with free general admission, contingent on item II.11 of this agreement. 6) Purchase the 'Empire' parking lot from the City at a cost of$343,000, payments to be made over a ten year period in equal annual increments of $34,300 commencing upon the date of the first bond payment made by the City of Salem for its new Church Street parking structure. MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING City of Salem/Peabody Essex Museum September 15, 1997 This memorandum of understanding is made and entered into between the City of Salem through its Mayor and City Council and the Peabody Essex Museum and its Board of Trustees through the President of the Board and Director and Chief Executive Officer. Whereas, the Museum has a long and distinguished presence in the City and has provided and continues to provide vitally important services to the City, the region, and the public at large; Whereas the Museum's collections represent the art, culture, and history of Salem, the region, and nations throughout the world, thereby providing an essential cultural and educational resource to the City's children, citizens, and the public at large; Whereas further expansion of the Museum will serve as a catalyst for economic development in the City of Salem, further enhance Salem's growing tourism industry, and further enrich the City and region's cultural and educational assets; Now therefore, the parties enter the following understanding as to the contributions each will make in a spirit of true partnership and collaboration: L The Peabody Essex Museum agrees to: 1) Carry out Phase II of its expansion/renovation project in Salem using Liberty Street and the Empire parking lot, in addition to the Museum's currentl.v owned property, including the former Salem Armory Headhouse lot Phase II of the Museum's expansion project will consist of three components: new construction on Liberty Street and the Empire parking lot, renovation of the Museum's Liberty Street facilities, and improvements to the Salem Armory Headhouse lot The type and extent of work at each location will be determined solely by the Museum, subject to approval by applicable City and other licensing and permitting agencies, and contingent on funding and related factors. Phase II of the Museum's expansion. project will commence no later than 23 September 2002. a) If for any reason the Museum does not proceed with the Phase II project and commence work by 23 September 2002, the Museum and the City will renegotiate the ownership of Liberty Street and the Empire parking lot. f CITY OF SALEM it Is IN CITY COUNCILSeptember 25, 1997 The Committee on on the Peabody-Essex Museum. to whom was referred the matter of the Museum expansion has considered said matrer and would recommend: that the Museum Committee forward to the Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the Peabody Essex Museum, a copy of this report and a certified copy of the Committee ' s unanimous ( 11-0 ) roll call support of the consent to the Mayor and Council President ' s signing of the attached Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Salem and the Peabody Essex Museum regarding the Museums expansion in downtown Salem. And would further recommend that this matter be reported out and unanimously adopted by the City Council at the next regularly posted meeting. In City Council September 25, 1997 Adopted by a unanimous roll call vote of 11 yeas, 0 nays, and 0 absent A motion for immediate reconsideration in the hopes it would not prevail was denied N.PTEST.: DEBORAR E. BURRINSBAW CITY CLERK Citp of balem, fifts;tarbuattg r 3planning 38oarb One 6alem Oreen City of Salem Planning Board Will hold a public hearing under Section 7-18, Site Plan Review of the City of Salem Zoning Ordinance at the request of Peabody Essex Museum,Inc. for the property located at East India Square (Essex and Charter Streets). The proposed project includes the construction of an approximately 100,000 square foot addition to the main Museum building, as well as a new public park and pedestrian esplanade. The addition will house exhibition galleries with the existing Museum building. In addition,the plan also includes a 19' century Chinese House to be reconstructed on site and linked to new galleries. The plan shows the demolition of the Empire Building and the acquisition of Liberty Street. The hearing will be held on Thursday,July 6,2000 at 7:30 PM in the cafetorium of the Bentley School. The hearing will be held in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 40A and the rules and regulations of the City of Salem. A copy of the application and plans is on file and available for review during normal business hours at the office of the Salem Planning Department, located on the second floor of One Salem Green. Walter B. Power, III Chairman June 22 and June 29, 2000 Remit Bill To: Peabody Essex Museum,Inc. c/o Joe Correnti Serafini, Serafini,Darling, and Correnti 63 Federal Street Salem, MA 01970 One Salem Green, Salem, Massachusetts 01970 (978) 745-9595 ext.311 Fax (978) 740-0404 n BOARD OF ASSESSORS 4 CITY HALL PA4AE ✓ �. SALEM, MA 01970 DATE___ _ 10-123-/-q6,-- _ .. _ CERTIFIED ABUTTERS LIST Ak -- — — SUBJECT-PROPERTY., - - - MAP: 35 LOT: 0230 SUFF: 301 --- f� - PROPERTY ADDRESS : 0161 ESSEX STREET +r ASSESSED OWNER PEABODY MUSEUM MAP LOT SUFF PROPERTY ADDRESS ASSESSED OWNER MAILING ADDRESS 35 0230 301 0161 ESSEX STREET PEABODY MUSEUM 161 ESSEX ST SALEM MA 01970 - -35 -0230 302 -0161 ESSEX -STREET PEABODY MUSEUM 161 ESSEX ST - - ,� - SALEM MA 01970 �^ 35 0230 303 0042 CHARTER STREET PEABODY MUSEUM161 ESSEX ST f __ ._. --SALEM MA 01970 -- -- - — -- 0 - 35 0209 0158 ESSEX STREET SALEM REDEVELOPMENT AUTH SALEM MA 01970 35 0210 0144 ESSEX STREET PEABODY MUSEUM OF SALEM AND 161 ESSEX STREET n ESSEX INSTITUTE INCORPORATED SALEM MA 01970 35 0212 801 0002 NEW LIBERTY STREET U1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 2 NEW LIBERTY STREET - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE _ SALEM MA 01970 - - 35 0212 802 0002 NEW LIBERTY STREET U2 MUSEUM COOPERATIVE OF SALEM INC 132 ESSEX STREET SALEM MA 01970 35 0212 803 _0002 NEW LIBERTY' STREET U3 MIISSUM COOPERATIVE OF SALEM INC 132 ESSEX STREET :. SALEM MA 01970 ^ 35 0212 804 0002 NEW LIBERTY STREET U4 MUSEUM COOPERATIVE OF SALEM INC 132 ESSEX STREET _ - _.-- - —- SALEM MA 01970 " 35 0213 0136 ESSEX STREET MUSEUM COOPERATIVE OF SALEM INC 132 ESSEX ST '^ SALEM MA 01970 35 0604 0002 EAST INDIA SQUARE HERITAGE MUSEUM REALTY TRUST 423 PURITAN ROAD _ i� BELHUMER R THOMAS TR SWAMPSCOTT MA 01907 "^ 35 0217 0137 ESSEX STREET KIERNAN RUSSELL 135 ESSEX STREET - SALEM MA 01970 " r, 35 0218 0007 LIBERTY STREET PEABODY MUSEUM OF SALEM AND 161 ESSEX STREET ^ ESSEX INSTITUTE SALEM MA 01970 35 0219 0024 CHARTER STREET 38 SALEM CITY OF 35 02290133 ESSEX STREET PEABODY MUSEUM OF SALEM AND 161 ESSEX STREET ESSEX INSTITUTE INC - SALEM MA 01970 -- 35 0231 0179 ESSEX STREET BERNARDS INC 179 ESSEX STREET ^ SALEM MA 01970 350M 0181 ESSEX STREET PEABODY MUSEUM OF SALEM 161 ESSEX STREET i� SALEM MA 01970 35 0235 201 0013 CENTRAL STREET ARJOD REALTY TRUST 20 LAUNCHING RD ----- - — --- _ DRIVAS A J & DRIVAS J A TRS ANDOVER MA 01810 35 0236 0017 CENTRAL STREET SALEM CITY OF ^ POLICE STATION 35 0617 0173 ESSEX STREET ONE SEVENTY THREE ESSEX ST TR 30 ARTHUR AVENUE _ LALLY BARBARA A TR MARBLEHEAD MA 01945 l0 1 -'TER M. CAROM { CHIEF ASSESSOR Y' F r; r 0 I BOARD OF ASSESSORS_._ . . j ^ CITY HALL PAGE '^ SALEM, -- MA 01970 DATE 10/23/96 i� CERTIFIED ABUTTERS LIST ^. SUBJECT PROPERTY . MAP: 35 LOT: 0230 SUFF: 301 PROPERTY ADDRESS: 0161 ESSEX STREET ^ ASSESSED OWNER PEABODY MUSEUM i ,< •5 MAP LOT SUFF PROPERTY ADDRESS ASSESSED OWNER MAILING ,ADDRESS- _ 17 ^. 35 0607 0057 CHARTER STREET SALEM REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY e 35 0618 0045 CHARTER STREET - PEABODY MUSEUM OF SALEM 161 ESSEX STREET _ in SALEM MA 01970 '!9 35_02_62 0043 CHARTER STREET REAR SALEM HOUSING AUTHORITY - ._ 27 CHARTER ST____ __- SALEM MA 01970 _ 35 0263 0043 CHARTER STREET PEABODY MUSEUM OF SALEM 161 ESSEX STREET SALEM MA 01970- 3 5 197035 0264 0051 CHARTER STREET SALEM CITY OF ' "^ CHARTER ST CEMETERY 35- _0265 _ 0053 CHARTER STREET PEABODY HARLAN B JR _ 6_FEDERAL CT SALEM MA 01970 ' 35 0266 0037 CENTRAL STREET CENTURY ASSOCIATES RLTY TRUST 400 MYSTIC AVENUE ^ SLOANE MARSHALL M ET AL MEDFORD_ MA 021.55_ ____-_ 35 0272 0027 CHARTER STREET SALEM HOUSING AUTHORITY 27 CHARTER STREET � r - SALEM MA 01970 J9 I 47 m n 51 ^ 52 61 �\ $J 61 G2 %^ I oa 0 ]i n el _. PETER M. CARON 7 CHIEF. ASSESSOR F r � BOARD-OF ASSESSORS Y CITY HALL PAGE: SALEM, MA 01970 .i 5 CERTIFIED ABUTTERS LIST a _------SUBJECT -PROPERTY:__. - MAP: 35 LOT: 0230 SUFF: 301 v PROPERTY ADDRESS: 0161 ESSEX STREET - ASSESSED OWNER PEABODY MUSEUM13 v I , v MAP LOT SUFF PROPERTY ADDRESS ASSESSED OWNER MAILING ADDRESS v 35 0183 801 0016 BROWN STREET Ul JONES CAMERSON W 203 WASHINGTON ST SUITE 304 JONES KAREN R SALEM?MA 01970 ` 35-BY83"802 - 0016 BROWN STREET U2- JONES CAMERON W 203 WASHINGTON-ST"-SUITE 30-4 - - -- - JONES KAREN R SALEM MA 01970 r 35 0183 803 0016 BROWN STREET U3 BROWN STREET COURT REALTY TRUST P 0 BOX 8230 v DONOVAN EDWARD_L TR SALEM MA-01973-- 35 0183 804 0016 BROWN STREET U4 BROWN STREET COURT REALTY TRUST P 0 BOX 8230 V DONOVAN EDWARD L TR SALEM MA 01971 v 35-$1$3- 805 - 0016 BROWN STREET U5 - - - - RODGERS JAMES E & RITA L _..F_O. BOX- 412__. ------ ------ -- _. - -_--- _- CORMIER EUGENE K & MADELEINE T MARBLEHEAD MA 01945 35 0183 806 0016 BROWN STREET U6 RODGERS JAMES E & RITA . L P 0 BOX 412 CORMIER EUGENE K &-MADELEINE T MARBLEHEAD-MA 01945 35 0227 801 0129 ESSEX STREET Ul NUGENT EDMOND B 129 ESSEX ST U1 a v NANCY B SALEM MA 01970 —35-8227--802--- -0-129- ESSEX-STREET U2--- -SCANLON JOSEPH ------- .. -._. 329' ESSEX SCANLON BRENDA SALEM MA 01970 - 35 0227 803 - 0129 ESSEX STREET U3 ZAPPAS MARY 129 ESSEX STREER U-3 SALEM MA _01970 -..- - --- - 35 0227 804 0129 ESSEX STREET U4 HART ALICIA 129 ESSEX STREET SALEM MA 01970 v `-- 5-0227 805- - 0129--ESSEX, STREET 05- - FLANAGAN MARTA MORRIS 129--ESSEX-ST -U1 5---____ w C/O SCOPA DONNA SALEM MA 01970 35 0227 806 0129 ESSEX STREET 116 FATHER MATTS TRUST 129 ESSEX ST U6 Y v - ------ -- . ._ . . _._.._. _-----_--- _ KELLEY GREGORY E/KELLEY-C S TRS SALEM -MA-01970-__ _ --- .- _.---- ---- __-- - 35 0227 807 0129 ESSEX STREET 117 ALTSHLILER DAVID A 129 ESSEX STREET y ALTSHLILER CAROL H SALEM MA 01970 375-10-2-27 -80$ 012.9 ESSEX STREET U8 - CARAMELLO DONNA LEE__ __ . 129-ESSEX STREET t18_. - _---_.__. -------. ---- ' SALEM MA 01970 35 0227 809 0129 ESSEX STREET U9 HINRICHS SANDRA 129 ESSEX ST U9 __._-._ _ ---__ .._ _ - . . SALEM--MA-01970 35 0227 810 0129 ESSEX STREET U10 SHERMAN WILLIAM A III 129 ESSEX STREET U10 . o/ v SHERMAN ELIZABETH E SALEM MA 01970 --- - 35-0227--811 - -`0129 ESSEX -STREET-illi- SIMON MARGO SALEM MA 01970 b+ i 35 0227 812 0129 ESSEX STREET 1112 WRYNN PATRICK 129 ESSEX ST L112 _ _.SALEM MA-X11-9-7.0_.._ s 35 0227 813 0129 ESSEX STREET 1113 CARR SARA E 129 ESSEX ST U13 V v C/0 SLATER SHIRLIg SALEM MA 01970 e, _35-6-21-2 -801­0002 NEW LI-BERTY STREET-til - - UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 2 --NEW-L-I-BERTY- STREET - - - -- -- - ---" v NATIONAL PARK SERVICE SALEM MA 01970 -71ouv - ------- _- _. _ ETER-M r-CAR6N- v CHIEF ASSESSOR - -- v =- _i�. : CITY HALL PAGE : r. SALEM, MA 01970 DATE- :-- -__ _._ _ __._ ._ _ . -. _ . -_. _ CERTIFIED ABUTTERS LIST is ] i - - - --- SUBJECT-PROPERTY : - MAP: 35 LOT: 0230 "_ SUFF: 301 PROPERTY ADDRESS : 0161 ESSEX STREET ASSESSED OWNER PEABODY MUSEUM 1 >^ + to n MAP LOT SUFF PROPERTY ADDRESS ASSESSED OWNER MAILING ADDRESS 35 0212 802 0002 NEW LIBERTY STREET U2 MUSEUM COOPERATIVE OF SALEM INC 132 ESSEX STREET SALEM MA 01970 -15-`0212-803-" POU-- NEW LIBERTY- STREET U3 MUSEUM COOPERATIVE OF SALEM INC 132 ESSEX STREET " SALEM MA 01970 v. 35 0212 804 0002 NEW LIBERTY STREET 114 MUSEUM COOPERATIVE OF SALEM INC 132 ESSEX STREET - SALEM-MA-- 01-970-- - - - - -- — 25, P. 35 0214 201 0120 ESSEX STREET 134 ESSEX INSTITUTE 120 ESSEX STREET ° it SALEM MA 01970 71 — 35-0215 - -0001 BROWN STREET ESSEX INSTITUTE 132 ESSEX ST____. SALEM MA 01970 it 32 In �� 17 d9 19 I V � %1 a° I r0 17 — c5 e. /\ 70 .... ._ ".__ ._ __ _ _ _ _ r _ _ _ PETER M:"CARON-._ _ _. - - .." _ __ ".---- CHIEF ASSESSOR �' j- I ^i t... Peabody E L) L) e x M U S U M i WEIDLINGER ASSOCIATES, INC. Structural Engineers Cecil Rizvi , Inc . ARCHITECTS AND PLANNERS VANDERWEIL ENGINEERS, INC. Mechanical Engineers _ Peabody Essex Museum Phase I Design Development Salem, Massachusetts August 16, 1996 4'I _f A Ts} Leceno 0421. BROWNomw-...B,wo STREET '3 -- x/E mx OR E 21 rIHE .•n � BRIAN �.n.r N ' O wNxou:n.r off" 0:'21» j 0 = rEucxaeE 1 ..E E �mPO df>re O CB OATEN B.FSW 36)'f wm .1N I K ' CLF r _ Po. T. K"..E O AID R - BASE P GTE ••I{ O S - A. n Y Bm'Y ff � y e BN COMA - OxCPEIE v dm mm vnASIA � NS KKPETE � IRNAI _ EL. N.xc i S . Wnu. a - NAB _ HANITHEII ST 0 _ nnM Po u P b NA Sp I AA old p.ABITIR BIT _ NBOFTER xO RWP v Y 3 6 EEEV. . y,]' y pAASTL RBB'a'T.-E .2 �iiL wbr ANA tEFERIT'. BE ZEN f >. °"" •• .• F ..FRrucCT N. .s R-Bs . wS " THEA® Y A. . i.xERE T s .ET A. SIEFERT NEBEHwiuE T AI AN _ Vl•I6M v •`1 vx LACUS]]. 913 SC4E:1:30'-0 FPOttPn NnxNECT NB.Ni N-ss ujMl i N 1ERxwE FEZ.[ST OAb B. BEK B. t. s E E0 3 J. A. 1 B .. _.. <. a r" �W s�amiPca �wSCALE A. E" tB.B_,no� KP) EEEecncc: Tl—Ap"lC .ASIC .'. ssoE"Peo�lw . B+cl ;r € ' SSR BEI.IN 526.1SALE. OTEs -• u T THE EP cx¢Nu a msnmaB; a ou , �..T B EEPBI Ep IT E B THE A. IIA IAN. 2 i f�7 „se].e B.'x ?' �R.n a 3" ION5TR CS 1.LOLPE INE.ATIL Bui..rB.N G.N - "L. L^' A A EA ULa. •y' '0�`: re. ... �e -•. a.oe. --• Se a sw4a.Ba a���.FBa Lro1s.�w Ss wrnom Mm .. ESSEX STREET 1 TOPOGRAPHIC PLAN N SALEM, MA IT SMC mye� SURVEnMc AND EARNHIS CONSULTANTS.INC BIT E�E�bm Hili 11p BRAINTREEFORBES ,ANA03116TL 30] • m NnBC.T 3a (617) ]BO-]]66 FPEFMEO IRA ME N..r ESSE.x 'Z-V -ON SNIMV8O 00. li 77_= � I I � I I I O- - -e - - - - - - - -- -- - - - - -- i . } LX 1f ll I $B F----------------- - f e I I i i A I I I e I I I I I I Ili F - I I pop ® - - - � - °Y 8 I II I El o I I I III- - - - - - - - - � - - - -;IwI I I I 1_N I I i r RERM.E WINDOW ro"TCN "x NG. •��. - Q NEW 510REfROM IN UY NG OPENING. JQ, REW E 9YIW1 r TO=R6A0M. t t : I❑. NE ..N M NEW IY NRY W MNG. $❑. NLW WINDOW IN t E%ISIING DOOR OPp11NG. PARA BEIIIW ALL . r ©NEW DOCK M EKIGRNG •�.. - IrINWW OPENING. ]Q.NE)N =R IN NEW .. WSDIIRY OPE1.'ING NEW A41MET SN m _ RE116I.LL1 SNOW FpICE I } Y raj 9 - I I { CM CMYNEK W E f - _ ro YATp1 EYJS>NM,SICN — _ RIDGE wn it IF/D CMiF➢NPr'ER , E1F/ATIXt PEIRNOIIY _ I I NEw�T BNMGIF - a ..t.:.. DORYER wALL 1YRGL i - - ATTIC FLOOR - I µuYpNY Gu11ER O 16 O.G. NEW O 16 O.C. °y'C •:• M. PrC .ALS PyyKy . :•i. r:• 69'.�•>.'v •33n :or.• vxna scRm�s y - a9'-10 - A' RFYOVE.IX611NG BRICK. . .. - - .. .. `. CM UT IIID YNE m RE-uY E15M2RE _ As REoul m.TW. _ W NG BRICK Op I .. .. .. FOR FlN5Nm OPENING. 2Rtl FLOOR r 19l BOOR . 29'-6 I PATLN EY NG WI i - OPEIANC wRN E NrG --1 l --- l--------------------- _ _ - • BASEMENT i r '1i -I a WINNOW HEY: REPIILE WNW TO MATCH UlnNG. ! - O NEW STMNff IN DIVING O 114c. - 3❑, NEW E SMLW N VMEFA W. ©NEW MN00W IN NEW WSONR!OPENING. jd$kQ! 5❑, NEW WINp IN IX NG D OPENING. PATCH BELOW SIU- NM ILLNEW ODOR IN E%ISIING 111NOOW GMING. NEMA DOOR N Nm by - W NRY OPENING }K+t H9n .F NOV ASPHALT SHINGLE REYWE N1O i. - - R]NST.41 SNON fFllC _ iI I MNE GP CHIM W/STONE — WICHNIXLSfI C.1YPIVL ro MARCH EASING.TmKIL HIGGE KM • lW C'M m COPPER HEY/ASPHALT SHNGIE ROOF ELEVATOR PFN11N105E NEW ASP T SNNGIE O mm WALL.IY m NEW ASPNM.T SHINGLE e OO m WAIL.TVPMl1 AWNNNY GUf1ER F 0 Ir LgC— O IS O.C. - A ATi1C FLOOR NEW COPPER CITER t TOP OF SCREEN - . 50 t t 60'- ♦ a esas YIDGEI L 4 e t6 O.C. } t ' - - IATIILE SCREENS OF SCREEN _.... .�?..r. 6�: 4 .'� `#• "A':' _ I Jr-INI ROOF 5T-t I _ _ 3rd FLOOR _. Fes.°.•}. 'r`9:•?.`. _ SLING .9-10 I _ _ - y1 `vi`".`F. R eg LVDI YEfAL � ' ROOF _ -T.,-,o 'If 2nd FLOOR i]9sl FLOOR _s I I ' NBRICK SECTION N I WEWTGM IXISNNG ' BASEMENT v'- I tl ea e> _— mow. ee I r 00 - - ` - A FRONT ELEVATION - -� scuE:scut i/e'- • i i ELE P-0' —_—___—_—_—___—_—_—_ —_—_—_—___—_— ELEv. O'-0' _ ------------- i • rorvm / `I\ j • �Z lov i I-- pp ji lilii ill���l II _ ---SLE. 6 REARELEVATION - _ � SCl1G SOLE i/8' � f-0' _ . ELEv. O'-0__—___—_____—___—______—_---___—_____—_____—_—_—_—_ i i ! I ' I , o LM I, I , 9 I F �6 L1 495 fY°, O I O- - - _-______ I LJ _ o- - I FT-1 z a Iwa 5. w m I0w � , o- - lE I SII i I 0 966T ISM 810 . • . : / • • 1 I e �� pA \/ \ ry�y %\ i --IfSCDI'' F i P � U e W E Z yy q Y O j f. is 1) .j f. y k� ' 4 y w i I i I f • . . 966T isnonv 9T .0 e e --------------- - ------------------- r� O I i -- - - - b H5 _ e - - a I I I I . I 0 m � .a u � a Z N ® Z 0 3 a a � 0 m 0 m ¢ o � W 2 O N O O O ® O © O O ® © i5 N- nf W o SEE W 1 r; ==_=_ - ------ _=a=-:- ---__- =-- - - _- - -SR _ =-- �ti -- �5---__-- ---_ �► - -- _-__ _S- -- - - -S� _ �. s- ___-- --� � -M' ��� '.��. �i� ��S ��- ���---� �i� ��-� 41 �- - -- -�� �� ink a�• �� "� �-a LZ. —= -------_---=_— _—_—_ — -£�=_--___— .•- - �r- =_�-_-� � ---�__ Qi KI V s mom ' mi I C5 a Z e � ® 0 3 N y� Z N Q O J W 2 lr � Z N © O O © O O O O C V W J Y� I IN - - ------------•-== --- ---------_-_--=_-NOW—��_=s p ate; O 9 == z a �IZIIiITtliq �nttrD 'Co 01 (&1V of ��ajem, fflassar4usj�tts gee�Mr.nd°` V7IIP "intutt Green REQUEST FOR REVIEW COMMENTS �� /-SPECIAL PERMIT _ DATE: OC/C/�:X-f'� �a • l 9�6/ TO: ( ) BUILDING INSPECTOR ( ) CONSERVATIONgTTC-O-MMISSION ( ) CITY ENGINEER (Other: ��J • ( ) BOARD OF HEALTH ? Attached please find the application referenced below. The Planning Board re- quests that you review this application relative to Section VII of of the Zoning Ordinance. We would appreciate your completing the form below and returning it to us. Notice of the public hearing for this application will be forwarded to you. / ( ) WETLANDS AND FLOOD HAZARD DISTRICTS (L_ SITE PLAN REVIEW ( ) CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT ( ) BUSINESS PARK DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT - ( ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPLICANT: O SJL� �o/GL.SC�GC/�✓� ' A �n ' I ✓^ PROJECT NAME & ADDRESS: OJL ' CONTACT PERSONS AND PHONE: /I Applicant: /'7pSp�/j{•j/C.GY/t?f�l /`CITY: ' �5��" COMMENTS DUE BY: lun'trn"bP,,- (Failure to comment within 35 days shall be deemd lack of opposition. ) YConcur with proposal (Explain on reverse side) ( ) Need more information (Explain on reverse side) (. ) Cannot concur with proposal (Explain on reverse side) ( I Comments included s 2d VIEWER`S SIGNATURE TITLE DATE SERAFINI, SERAFINI AND DARLP1IIN,tG r ATTORNEYS AT LAW 63 FEDERAL STREET E .. SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 rt 1 t TELEPHONE JOHN R. SERAFINI,SR. 508' -744-0212 JOHN R. SERAFINI.JR. 617-581-2743 JOHN E. DARLING ELLEN M, WINKLER TELECOPIER JOSEPH C.CORRENTI October 16, 1996 606741-6663 Walter B. Power, III, Chairman City of Salem Planning Board One Salem Green Salem, Massachusetts 01970 RE: Application for Special Permit under Site Plan Review Peabody Essex Museum Expansion - Essex Block Dear Mr. Power: On behalf of the Peabody Essex Museum ("Museum") , owners of the properties listed below located in East India Square - along Essex Street, hereinafter referred to as the "Essex Block", application is hereby made for a Site Plan Review Special Permit under Section 7-18 of the -City of Salem Zoning Ordinance. The properties. in question are as follows: 1. 132 Essex Street, The Plummer Hall and Daland House (formerly the Essex Institute) , hereinafter known as the "Library"; _ 2 . 144 Essex Street, The Rogers Building, hereinafter known as the "Museum Office Center" or "MOC" ; and 3. 2 New Liberty Street, The former Salem Armory Drill Shed, basement storage. The work proposed on these properties is essentially interior rehabilitation of the buildings' mechanical systems and redesign of existing floor space (minimal in the case of the Library and Drill Shed basement) as shown on the plans filed herewith. Exterior changes to the buildings will be minor in nature. The rehabilitation of these buildings referrgd to as the "Essex Block" , is the first phase of the Plan to transform one of America's oldest and most esteemed museums into a museum for the 21st Century. The Plan will help revitalize Salem and the region through education, economic development, cultural life and recreational opportunities. The Museum's Master Plan is a comprehensive program for expanded facilities and institutional F . Walter B. Power, III, Chairman October 16, 1996 Page 2 I development designed to celebrate the Museum's 200th anniversary of its founding in 1999. The Third Century Fund is the companion capital campaign for the Plan representing an investment in the future for the Museum in Salem. This Plan will serve as a catalyst for implementing the Downtown Business and Cultural Development Action Plan. The total investment by the Museum toward the implementation of its overall Plan will be in the range of $75 million dollars, which will include $36.2 million in construction costs. This represents perhaps the single largest private investment ever made in the City. The economic impact on Salem and the region is conservatively estimated to exceed $160 million over the near term. The Essex Block Expansion Plan is critical in that it will allow the Museum's collections and offices to be moved from the main museum buildings on the Liberty Street Block into newly rehabilitated buildings located on the Essex Block. Once this move is completed the Liberty Street Block Expansion and renovation, including the renovation of the Essex Street Plaza, will commence. An architect has just recently been selected and will soon begin the Liberty Street Block design. The plans as filed indicate the details of the proposed rehabilitation of the buildings. Because most of the proposed work is interior work to existing buildings, the applicant requests that the requirement of an Environmental Impact Statement be waived. The proposed plans will not create any additional vehicular traffic flow or circulation through the downtown. During the course of the presentation, all items required under §7-18 will be addressed by the applicant. In conclusion; Salem's rich heritage will be preserved and enhanced by implementation of the Museum's Master Plan, a heritage that encompasses our art and culture and that of people around the world. Some of this heritage is known and accessible but much of it has been hidden in storage vaults and archives. The Museum's Plan will bring this cherished and valuable heritage to light and enrich the lives of. our children and millions of people over the next century. Walter B. Power, III, Chairman October 16, 1996 Page 3 Wherefore, we respectfully request that the Board grant the Site Plan Review Special Permit for the three properties as requested. Sincerely, THE PEABODY ESSEX MUSEUM By - 01 hn R. Sera ni, Sr. JRS:jaf Enclosures _----_-_ 4 _ e d' y E e C1 abo U M i (f 'r I i i I I i j WEIDLINGER ASSOCIATES, INC. Cecilp Rizvi � • Structural Engineers & ARCHITECTS AND PLANKTERS VANDERWEIL ENGINEERS, INC. Mechanical Engineers f Peabody Essex Museum Phase I Design Development Salem, Massachusetts August 16, 1996 i 4i I i y -� - LECENo .a BROWNN.O—\wIiIiao STREET NI OR FORMERLY I XIX OCas CwM'ELFE�wC uuwME Y Ap - - ra. O w.a m,�w¢ T63'S o ce sw c1E' 11. AA-.—E o UP U[n LRE. s _ DW - GE u 0Gx ff ' SAFE DATE anxlxwn ,.lm R 1B - coxcveE ba ANN MANDE E. coaFElE YI�MmAN DR. CREATE ANN .1 INNA :ET SNAINE -.0 SPoC MADEM AM - E¢nEa NwaxwE. Ea a e.. 4' AO ...DED a .r. - FREE..I e AN FIE EDAEFE { { = PSEAN N.:AA E MLL IF CEN TRAINED E % EINnMX v1 _ u FNEI -E AT aANNwa TaKxc j p oX R EfEES: T_aDEMILES ANN . dd Yu wM •. .n. .0 tew FIT I PAN I MEAN EECT Al,NES E-95 t \ ® u —21 ^ xE.N.1 I EKE S PAN N. ANN ID�QGFRFNRT ANDOMI A A, IVOO�E O.���L A. I/e _ n . �uS�w LAN EN NE4 NER,�EEl UA Iro, :.° fRPiEEE x z SAFE..E.SAFNIS�.EKE VELSPEEN ELF wwwD. x rry a.° EL I]o ouE'. F--l. - ^�i ne DAN SAFE.IPRI�ISI ATFIESI AA AMI SALE.. i Iml_4 OiMC MY! ANA, _ hl EIF 0 cE .g di II \.Yg FARz• •` . h o FINE EI ANDE 0 ANDA v Ith 3� 63 U .AN Fe. of Doo.) I • va9" ; t rvAEcs ' i T f SEv v.E STUART. .-z. .v •• _ a R 0[2Eu x[DEEEdC MELSu III a •w u E,,SET x d C S C FIE F SEEADN' [E w ]BES 1 AN E o 5). uA o 5 a • Un ITY ES SEN d NIS PLAN'AS lIF u T:' 11p u\ zes. TE SID-SIFE sxRI ED RON TIE �RIADI MARPAI:,.11P11 AND „ - D t' B M FO Y •�Pe } "L» L;~ •. ~ d'L:,, ` ".0� ... °f .... a..a+. ... ii 7DJENFETE I GTI Dx s.u,,.AS ADNDN AAA S RIC E READ _ gv N qq ESSEX e\.e—.e..a.o STREET S - TOPOGRAPHIC PIAN 1 _ N �.� SALEM, MA SMC MimnYEFEb SUPKnxG AND MAPPING CONSULTANTS, INC 170 EORBESFOAS, sm CE zm b�l►nna 8RAINTRCC. AA Obe. . B n gOP1K SGIF fn.]0' e - (sn) LED- E LED Ez»ss PREPARED FOR AX NIND. . 0 , , . . 9661 lSn9i NVId J008 fig 1 I I I I I b Ea � O 4 G 9s -- -- ----------- — f: 4 I I f . I I b G I I 1 yy 8 ED f Gq Ga � � ggbYf ELI' I I I I I I I 1 1 I I 1 I I _ O 4 � I _�.°��.�_�......mss-r.+...�e�s+..i...wr.�..... 5N w 1e i _ Wlxmy✓�' � 4a Ar ] Y If 1❑.RFPIACE WINODW ,•� . TO WTCH IX511NG 3Q.NEW SRIRESRONL IN IX6TING OPENING. JQ.NEW ENTRY sIml f TO SfOR W. ANEW WIWW IN NEW 4 NW OPENING. ,A r SQ.NflY WiNWW IN ""NG WOR OPENING. PATCN BEIOe 4LL _ - � ©NEW DWR WIXSRNG '•. . W1NWW WF]IWG. .. Q NEW DOOR W NEW Y/5Dt1RY OPEIIING - NEW ASPWLT 41LYGIE - IND r .�".f- - RE116rN1 SNOW.fFNCE. f � 4r I 'Y h 111 CAP C1e1NEK W/PONE _ ro wTcx EwSrING.TYPIryI. RNGE YFNr - l ca.Tm COPPER _ ", _ - fTEVALIXt PIXONNY — IFW�T$NINCIE ^ — WRYfA WI11.TYPN'K ATTIC FLOOR 0 IV tfMrvFNS' r e 6 O.C. - NEw COPPER curTrn J 0 I T LDWERS '+r'srr3.f e• a � I. �'r O 6 O.C. �(.• f•Jr�yJ. Jl> r 'de J d �Y Y J IATIIQ YAEENS . . r }rtl FLOOR ♦9'-10 1/ I �ay TOK-US AVD NM - - ^% _ RE1NSfALL M"K BRICK --- FlNISHEO OPENING.T9. _. . .. •. 2ntl FLOOR, f ]9'-B 1 _ 1st FLOOR - 3ff-6 I .. PATCH' wN WI F i - I � I I I OPOUNG WREYSIIrG B31CK ; 1 n ---- 1----------------------- 1 ___ _ BASEMENT, - __ ------------------------- WININIW KEY,. _ 1Q. REPVLE WINDOW - m MATCH UIS NG. 2❑. NEW S(MF W IN f MA NG MENING. JQ. NEW ENTRY SIMWI _ . m STMEFRONT. ©NLW WINDOW IN NEW MASONRY OPENING. NG WW DOOR MEMW NG. PAT'NG PATCH RELGW ALL NEW DOOR IN MSTtNG wINI]oW ovENiNG. NEW DOOR IN NEW 55 - MA w OPENING 5 �5 NEW tf( ,REYT2 MLT SNINGIE ROOF,RE. FENCE. _ .- .. .. oRETNST/.LL SNOW IIS i Q Q Q Q Q 6 i t JW CMWM W/STdIE t W CMMN W/STONE m wmH C(6 .TWIW_ 4 m MATCH IXI W.TWM t - MWE VEM . t j L COATED COPPER ' El£'ATOR NEW ASPWLT SHINfA£RCOF NEW A MLT SHIMQ WRYER WNL.TYPNAL NEW ASPwLT SHINGIE DIX m WNL IYPICK i - N MINUY GIIT2R • YIWET LIXNETS - e If O.C. - j TOP OF SCREEN ATTIC FLOOR _ NEW COPRn WTTER 60'- YIWET ox.O.C. ATTICE 1 WOW PRSCREEMS - A°:aa• ' °• °'°•• ®°••" °° °° ° TOP OF SCREEN ° - - ° a d:ti"d:•d dd:h• - - - sr-101 ROOF . 3rd FIOOft a �+p°.:°•.• °`;�..`da � — _ �� j - --- - -- - .. - .. .9'-m , .. .-_ _ .-_J d ad �' l °•�T•d0•e'S.R!'" LS,-fes, - — —- - 0 I727 2nd FLOOR Id I 1 - TsLF O�OR 3 9'-6 I/ NEW MICN YLTON TO w{pl Exlmxc BASEMENT it i � 2 I' { j } f x i ell e. ii ULM 00 00 r m�. F - - - � A FRONT ELEVATION — ELE . °'-V ______ 1 Y kai� � r m�i�u luiriiFu�7� 00 Eau 00 C 00 yW mli.d J- - @REAR ELEVATION °'-P • . �•. RovNOIS ANOWNV i I i i � I 1 I A -m, lot II yy _LMM_ Dn= S II,I lrj I —_ _— -- 11 1.12 Lm O g !III - I i Mt �. .. 1m [ j —� a J \ 1 I ------------ ooILI - _=I I .�—��••n+••norwuaq•:_Y.w+.•.n•v.•fi4^N^PY.V<�W.p.wnyr�•.{.'aa\Yn...n•.+...�-_- , a i { ; I ' I f S� $ it � Y r•. L"�i p` }`^'T '.�a2i;�i`�.�; � r 4 ( 1 lcccau i PLUMMER CONNECTOR DALAND i R RB -------------- 966T isnc b 11 4II O— ------------------- [[QQE F O 1 O all b � 1 . b _ p I_�✓Hv/J I I i i i o r .m m � I m El 0 3 m "> ¢ o O I El O 0 Q � W w � 2 y C. ^J LW o -- ---- ��=:SSS-��-�, ®I■ �w7• ■ ■ L��S��.-__ Li. z •.- nnnnnn.e.�nn.e.�n.�.�.�n ��- n 5 J �P■k=_-__-r■�_=t,■7F==-__■■■z=�-sP■_-�_!■■:_� o =■_■■—�_■■■�:1=■9�r�'��P_�—=-P_■ [3a IIS I] � I� ■I�■J � ' ■�I� ■I - �! [J �i J= U< m�,u N ® w 3 o 0 m z 0 o J W 2 F- u Z �n. y U U -via=_.a_, �� �'-�r=-rr_rr_=___-=_�r=_�=. _ -��=.•=r_?�a��rt_�_�•r a=:'-�:- a�M___._,; U ONE :o _ - -. a:a v yy '� �SS� aia a�5�. aia ��T- SNS ai■ ��i� ONE _Y. .v.._ O. ME ■ -ice ■■■ ■■■ aa __ Y� - - _ �- a==== as■�■e■ �_�■==j�■ � � im - ate■= aia aaa — a.a—OHi•a _a�a a-iiYl•1•tiiYY1WY Y Y •����=y3� -��-YYYYYYYYYYY•-Y• __YI IYYYYYmall YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY_YYYYYYYYr��_=- rti I-YYYYYYYYYYYYYY�..-_.. -®,-YYYYYYYYY-YY-YY-YY-YY-YY-YY-YY-YY-YY-YY-YY-YYY-- YYYYYYYYYYYY-YY-YY-YY-YY•Y•-Y�--7rr-YY-YY-YY-YY-YY-Y--Y•.L-F=As=£=_=-_ I-EE = YYYYYYYYYYYYY•�Y-IIYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYmmmmmmmmYYYYYYYYYYYYY_IYYYYYYYa=-�� _ all �YYSA••�-•>•1YYYYYY�YYYYYY�YYYYYYYYYYYYYYY.aim=YYYYY-` _ _ ._-_ -==-e��-d-EI-YYYYYYYYYYY-YYYYY--YYYYYYYYY-YY-YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY••YYI-YYYYYY• YYYYYYYrYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY-YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY-�-�YYYYYYY.�r= r- z W C V J 0 City of Oatem, AaggacbUgeng Sv "� AWP Office of the Citp Council ��nmsW� � QCitp �aU �VE vlr^ej se4 .5 c 5C4Je �S C - .� 11 p ,'KCtiIS cbov� w�0 , ter � f 0 tU �voK � res`��V Q�' ( l/ e treed J �e R o Je✓S PI ✓)242J e. � � J vs� ))sePs. i P�r,,ce✓ �r��kEVs• _✓ neµ ecu r � G G A\ KEG —,L YQ-v,[ { l cZ S "2 v�x vV2 ,1n2K K 1 S'�� vs IY"�1n1 ' 2 5ov�e ✓o✓✓}/ 71_ S a IQ v^• {���� J � G�� I C�Vi 41-S Cn C,b �„� �}/�r✓S P vwt /n,� e jrr I [cCe jCoj TU 2S�ztic�1r"�1 �I � iA;�71 ) s�eP UK� C'.U✓1�IK� 7, J }U-{�I'n, O/G✓I� / � U�P Q G� 1 ✓l/1.J Y�US� eN� e(w 1/ff� LLIA Si�cPVF �y, DoT Cit of Oatem, p Aiaggacfjugetto Office of the Citp couneit ��nnNeVm QCitp jbdu Cc" 2-T V. M v r e CL V%\ V-1V t n V 4e�� y � [ �e + -�r c. S�O�C t4 Pe sp(�ti rev F � � �> ��tlS IS ill el u 5'�c(O cK F-Ct/L'�V 1 Z Tim Ct�l� U .,ee e I J4 Gvt , S pre p pp .-I} c C AS C e, 2 �(1 V'I i e.,-} �G� '�2CG ry �'l ! Ze ci✓t } t y-e5 �c I t � e m� se�.m as C� Ye �,0s ,� _ �' ✓� CIS 7 U C� y U K CJ` reaceS io+6 V1e �e�f j' w, (( foecov� e t�a�(� cla.Ss vKvseuv-, / o t7lt5 Ci 1-1-5(011- . 0 (4tg of#81m, massoc4usetts 3 xi Office of the Titg Touncil (lug Hall COUNCILLORS-AT-LARGE JOHN J.DONAHUE WARD COUNCILLORS PRESIDENT __.1996 ..- ---____... -. _--DEBORAH E; - ----- --- --- - - - -- - THOMAS H.FUREY CIN CLERK PETER L.PASKOWSKI KEVIN R.HARVEY REGINA R.FLYNN SCOTT J.MCLAUGHLIN JOHN J.DONAHUE STANLEY J.USOVICZ,JR. LEONARD F.O'LEARY WILLIAM A.KELLEY SARAH M.HAYES November 3, 1996 MARK E.BLAIR Mr. Walter Power I II Chairman: Planning Board One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 DearlI� trv~er: I am enclosing a copy of the letter I received from Dan Monroe, Executive Director of the Peabody Essex Museum. As you know, this undertaking by the museum is both positive and exciting for the City of Salem. I wholeheartly support the musuem in their efforts. I would ask that you and the members of the Planning Board support the museum as well. Please do not hesitate to contact me if I can be of any further assistance. Sincerely, Bill Kelley Councillor, 7WarFive MUSEUM PLACE Heritage Museum Realty Trust November 1, 1996 NOV 5 1996 Chairman Salem Planning Board �� >+ °""i �"''•' City of Salem One Essex Green Salem, MA 01970 Dear Chairman: The Peabody Essex Museum is a cornerstone of the City of Salem and it is with pride and honor that I call them "neighbor". As we near completion of our multi-million dollar project, I think back on the announcement (about a year ago)by the Museum for their planned expansion. That announcement sealed our commitment to Museum Place and our commitment to the City of Salem. The proposed development and rehabilitation plan as prepared by the Museum demonstrates a strong confidence in the City of Salem and will truly be a program discussed around the world. The ultimate economic impact will be dramatic. The Peabody Essex Museum is an institution everyone is to be proud of. As a neighbor and as a businessman, they have my u:l support. Sincerely vaiirs, R. Thomas Belhumeur Heritage Museum Realty Trust cc: D. Monroe Post Office Box 8003 • Salem, Massachusetts 01971 9 Ph: (508) 744-9910 • Fx: (508) 744-6265 i "' 1668 The House of the Seven Gables Settlement Association November 4, 1996 Mr. Walter B. Power III, Chairman Salem Planning Board c/o Planning Department City Hall One Salem Green Salem MA 01970 Dear Mr. Power, The Peabody Essex Museum has begun a visionary program that will invest $75,000,000 of private funds to expand its exhibit areas and facilities and build a new Museum. When completed the new Peabody Essex will be a magnet that attracts visitors and transforms the surrounding area. An initiative of this scale will make a great difference for Salem. It is important, too, for the House of the Seven Gables because we depend so heavily on tourist visitation to support our Settlement House and to maintain our historic houses. Presently there is before your Board a request from the Peabody Essex for a special permit to carry out Phase I of this work. This involves renovation of the Rogers Building, work on the systems at the Essex Institute, and adaptation of the Armory basement for museum quality storage. All are important first steps to begin moving this project forward. The Planning Board will deliberate, as you must do. In the end I trust that you will act in an expeditious manner and award the permit. This is an important decade for Salem. While viewpoints may differ at times, citizens and institutions must join and work toward a common goal on behalf of this City, so that in the future we can reflect proudly on how well we worked together today. Thank you very much. Sincerely, Thomas H. Neel Executive Director 54 Turner Street, Salem,Massachusetts 01970 • (508)744-0991 • Fax(508)741-4350 The Settlement House • 114 Derby Street • (508)745-5909 SALEM 1630: pioneer village at Forest River Park November 5, 1996 Mr. Walter B. Power III,Chairman Salem Planning Board One Salem Green Salem,Massachusetts 01970 Dear Mr. Chairman, On November 7, 1996 the Peabody Essex Museum will be presenting a site plan for the first phase of the expansion of their facility. As you know,toursim and cultural awareness are both on the rise worldwide. The Peabody Essex Museum plans for additional exhibit space are crucial in order to compete effectively with other world class museums for that tourism market. We at the Salem Witch Museum think that any expansion of our cultural community will allow all of us to reach that market. We strongly urge the Salem Planning Board to approve these plans so that the Peabody Essex Museum can begin work. The earlier they get started the earlier we as a community can begin reaching the world community with yet another,reason to visit Salem. cer Bra a '/ chaud Executpl Director cc: Dan L. Monroe Salem Witch Museum Washington Square Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (508) 744-1692 • Fax 744-169- Titg of Iftiem, Massur#usPtts P rQ Offire of the Ottl Toundt NUv (lug mail � " 1996 COUNCILLORS-AT-LARGE JOHN J.DONAHUE WARD COUNCILLORS PRESIDENT _1995 _.- .-_- .____ _ .__.DEBORAH E.BURKINSHAW -_- THOMAS H.FUREY CITY CLERK PETER L.PASKOWSKI KEVIN R.HARVEY REGINA R.FLYNN SCOTT J.MCLAUGHLIN JOHNJ.DONAHUE STANLEY J.USOVICZ,JR. LEONARD F O'LEARY WILLIAM A.KELLEY SARAH M.HAYES MARK E.BLAIR November 6, 1996 Mr. Walter B. Power III, Chairman Planning Board City of Salem One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 RE: Peabody Essex Museum Site Plan Review Dear Mr. Power: I have reviewed the application and plans submitted to you by the Peabody Essex Museum for Site Plan Review for the so- called Essex Block. I understand that this first phase allows the Museum to begin its plan to revitalize the institution as well as the entire downtown area. The revenue that will be generated by the additional visitors to the City should help the entire downtown business community. I fully support the Museum's plans as being an important investment in the City. Sincerely, ._ Peter L. Paskowski Councillor, Ward One u The SALEM Officers M A S S A C H U S E T T S Past Presidents Thomas M. Leonard, Chairman __- D/� RTN.ri �CHi_D _ Stanley J. Lukowski (1987-1989 umner ones, resident Thomas M.Leonard(1989-1991 Russell T.Vickers, Vice President 6 Central Street William J.Tinti(1991-1993) Peter H. Dinsmore,Treasurer David W. Ives(1993-1996) Craig L.Wheeler,Clerk Salem, Massachusetts 01970 (508) 741-8100 Annie C. Harris, Executive Director FAX (508) 745-6131 November 7, 1996 Walter B. Power III, Chairman Salem Planning Board One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Dear Mr. Power: I am writing on behalf of The Salem Partnership which supports the Peabody Essex Museum's expansion and renovation plans in downtown Salem. Although we cannot speak about the details of the Phase I proposal before the Planning Board tonight, we are in favor of the Museum's conceptual plans and we encourage the timely review of this important project. The Museum's commitment to this expansion project is a major commitment to Salem. The expansion/renovation program will be a major boost to the downtown economy, as millions of visitors will visit this world-renown, first-class museum. The Peabody Essex Museum's expansion/renovation program is a positive step that will ensure we all move forward as we enter the next millennium. Sincerely, Annie C. Harris Executive Director mow. o �r. Lyceum Bair Grill November 7, 1996 Chairman, Salem Planning Board Dear Chairman, As the owner of a business in downtown Salem, and as a resident of the area, I enthusiastically support the Peabody Essex Museum's expansion plans. From a cultural point of view, it will further enhance Salem's reputation. From an economic viewpoint, it will have a dramatic impact on the area's Bed and Breakfast establishments, shops, hotels, and restaurants. It has been our experience at the Lyceum that the visitor to the Peabody Essex has more discretionary income than the usual Salem tourist and is much more likely to shop, eat or stay in Salem. For example, our business dramatically increased during "The Great Age of Sail"exhibit. We strongly advocate prompt approval of their plans. Sincerely, GeorgeIrvington Owner, Lyceum Bar&Grill 43 Church Street • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (508) 745.7665 FAX (508) 744-7699 Z 'RR Salem COW- Nancy D. Harrington, President November 4, 1996 Walter B. Power, III, Chairman �� 1y Salem Planning Board Salem Planning Department NOV 8 9996 1 Salem Green Salem Salem, MA 01970 �uc�„t3ld° ➢ �c+)' Dear Chairman: Salem State College wishes to endorse the Peabody Essex Museum's request for a special permit under the Site Plan Review Ordinance for approval of Phase I of the Museum's plans. The College is a Corporate Partner of the Peabody Essex Museum and numerous College functions are held at this facility each year. The City of Salem's economic development is enhanced by the reputaiion'of the Peabody Essex Museum'and'the impact of this project will x greatly further the City of Salem as a vibrant economic area on the North Shore. I personally welcome the development of the Museum as a national and international resource as a compliment to the College. We hope that our endorsement will help influence your decision to approve the Peabody Essex N Museum's request. M Thank you. Sincerely, Nancy Harrington President NDH.-&b C. Dan L. Monroe;`Executive Director, Peabody Essex Museum ' aoc:peapriius u T i ROCKETT MANAGEMENT& REALTY CO., INC. 190 PLEASANT STREET MARBLEHEAD,MASS.01945 TEL.(617)631.3070 FAX(617)639-2290 J.HILARY ROCKETT,JR. Vice President November 6, 1996 Salem Planning Board 1 Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Attn: Walter B. Power III, Chairman RE: Peabody Essex Museum Dear Mr. Power, I understand the Peabody Essex Museum is requesting a special permit from the Salem Planning Board for the approval of Phase I of the Museum's plan. I want to state that I am in full support of such a request and look forward to this project beginning as soon as possible. It will certainly have a positive effect for downtown Salem. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me. ncer, ly, Ii 1 i J. t a o kett, Jr. V ' Pr;side t JHR:nh SALEM ('FI AMBER of C0\11NIERC:E Z y 32 Dcrbc Square.Salcm. MA 01970-3777.4 elQphone: 508.744.0004.Pax: 508,745 2855 November 6, 1996 Mr. Walter Power Chairman City of Salem Planning Board One Salem Green Salem,Massachusetts 01970 Dear Mr. Power: The Salem Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors at their June 11, 1996 meeting voted to endorse the concept of the Peabody Essex Museum's expansion plan. The Board recognized that the Peabody Essex Museum's expansion plan will be the catalyst for dramatic change in the downtown area. The Salem Chamber of Commerce wishes to go on record in support of the Peabody Essex Museum's requestfor a special permit under the Site Plan Review Ordinance for Phase I of the Museum's plan. Sincerely, ruce Haas President r t (Ift of*u1eut, Massar4usetts l ids Office of toe (IIitu (IInunctl (IIttu Bull COUNCILLORS-AT-LARGE JOHN J.DONAHUE WARD COUNCILLORS PRESIDENT 1996 DEBORAH E.BURKINSHAW 1996 THOMAS H.FUREY CITY CLERK PETER L.PASKOWSKI KEVIN R.HARVEY SCOTT J.MCLAUGHLIN REGINA R.FLYNN STANLEY J.USOVICZ,JR. JOHN J.DONAHUELEONARD F O'LEARY WILLIAM A.KELLEY SARAH M.HAVES November 3, 1996 MARK E.BLAIR Mr. Walter Power III Chairman: Planning Board One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Dear r: I am enclosing a copy of the letter I received from Dan Monroe, Executive Director of the Peabody Essex Museum. As you know, this undertaking by the museum is both positive and exciting for the City of Salem. I wholeheartly support the musuem in their efforts. 1 would ask that you and the members of the Planning Board support the museum as well. Please do not hesitate to contact me if I can be of any further assistance. Sincerely, Bill Kelley Councillor, War Five MUSEUM PLACE Heritage Museum Realty Trust November 1, 1996 „'^"TZ I I d NOV 5 1996 Chairman Salem Planning Board City of Salem One Essex Green Salem, MA 01970 Dear Chairman: The Peabody Essex Museum is a cornerstone of the City of Salem and it is with pride and honor that I call them"neighbor". As we near completion of our multi-million dollar project, I think back on the announcement (about a year ago) by the Museum for their planned expansion. That announcement sealed our commitment to Museum Place and our commitment to the City of Salem. The proposed development and rehabilitation plan as prepared by the Museum demonstrates a strong confidence in the City of Salem and will truly be a program discussed around the world. The ultimate economic impact will be dramatic. The Peabody Essex Museum is an institution everyone is to be proud of. As a neighbor and as a businessman, they have my Lull support. SinceV' rely rs, R. Thomas Belhumeur Heritage Museum Realty Trust cc: D. Monroe Post Office Box 8003 • Salem, Massachusetts 01971 • Ph: (508) 744-9910 • Fx: (508) 744-6265 The House of the Seven Gables Settlement Association November 4, 1996 Mr. Walter B. Power III, Chairman Salem Planning Board c/o Planning Department City Hall One Salem Green Salem MA 01970 Dear Mr. Power, The Peabody Essex Museum has begun a visionary program that will invest $75,000,000 of private funds to expand its exhibit areas and facilities and build a new Museum. When completed the new Peabody Essex will be a magnet that attracts visitors and transforms the surrounding area. An initiative of this scale will make a great difference for Salem. It is important, too, for the House of the Seven Gables because we depend so heavily on tourist visitation to support our Settlement House and to maintain our historic houses. Presently there is before your Board a request from the Peabody Essex for a special permit to carry out Phase I of this work. This involves renovation of the Rogers Building, work on the systems at the Essex Institute, and adaptation of the Armory basement for museum quality storage. All are important first steps to begin moving this project forward. The Planning Board will deliberate, as you must do. In the end I trust that you will act in an expeditious manner and award the permit. This is an important decade for Salem. While viewpoints may differ at times, citizens and institutions must join and work toward a common goal on behalf of this City, so that in the future we can reflect proudly oil how well we worked together today. Thank you very much. Sincerely, OZ., 9( Thomas H. Neel Executive Director 54 Turner Street, Salem,Massachusetts 01970 • (508)744-0991 • Fax(508)741-4350 The Settlement House • 114 Derby Street • (508)745-5909 SALEM 1630: pioneer village at Forest River Park November 5, 1996 Mr. Walter B. Power III, Chairman Salem Planning Board One Salem Green Salem,Massachusetts 01970 Dear Mr. Chairman, On November 7, 1996 the Peabody Essex Museum will be presenting a site plan for the first phase of the expansion of their facility. As you know,toursim and cultural awareness are both on the rise worldwide. The Peabody Essex Museum plans for additional exhibit space are crucial in order to compete effectively with other world class museums for that tourism market. We at the Salem Witch Museum think that any expansion of our cultural community will allow all of us to reach that market. We strongly urge the Salem Planning Board to approve these plans so that the Peabody Essex Museum can begin work. The earlier they get started the earlier we as a community can begin reaching the world community with yet another reason to visit Salem. cererch Bru e PExeeu cc: Dan L. Monroe Salem Witch Museum • Washington Square Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (508) 744-1692 • Fax 744-1692 (fitg d 1*0lem, Massar4usetts Office of the (litu fdowdl Novg THU ?Halt �pl, V 6X996 COUNCILLORS-AT-LARGE JOHN J.DONAHUE WARD COUNCILLORS PRESIDENT 1996 DEBORAH E.BURKINSHAW 7996 THOMAS H.FUREY CITY CLERK PETER L.PASKOWSKI KEVIN R.HARVEY SCOTT J.MCLAUGHLIN REGINA R.FLYNN STANLEY J.USOVICZ,JR. JOHN J.DONAHUELEONARD F.O'LEARY WILLIAM A.KELLEY SARAH M.HAYES MARK E.BLAIR November 6, 1996 Mr. Walter B. Power III, Chairman Planning Board City of Salem One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 RE: Peabody Essex Museum Site Plan Review Dear Mr. Power: I have reviewed the application and plans submitted to you by the Peabody Essex Museum for Site Plan Review for the so- called Essex Block. I understand that this first phase allows the Museum to begin its plan to revitalize the institution as well as the entire downtown area. The revenue that will be generated by the additional visitors to the City should help the entire downtown business community. I fully support the Museum's plans as being an important investment in the City. Sincerely, Peter L. Paskowski Councillor, Ward One i t fp The SALEMOfficers f5MASSA C H U S ET T S Past Presidents - Thomas M. Leonard, Chairman - PA RTNI IERSI H lI P Stanley J. Lukowski(1987-1989) Sumner W.Jones, President - a`"".. Thomas M. Leonard(1989-1991) Russell T Vickers,Vice President 6 Central Street William J.Tinti (1991-1993) Peter H. Dinsmore,Treasurer - - Salem, MdSSdChUSettS 01970 w David W. Ives(1993-1996) Craig L.Wheeler,Clerk _ _ - - - (508) 741-8100 Annie C. Harris, Executive Director FAX (508) 745-6131 _ - November 7, 1996 Walter B. Power III, Chairman Salem Planning Board One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 'L '_ Dear Mr. Power: I am writing on behalf of The Salem Partnership which supports the Peabody Essex Museum's expansion and renovation plans in downtown Salem. Although we cannot speak about the details of the Phase I proposal before the Planning Board tonight, we are in favor of the Museum's conceptual plans and we encourage the timely review of this important project. The Museum's commitment to this expansion project is a major commitment to Salem: The expansion/renovation program will be a major boost to the downtown economy, as millions of visitors will visit this world-renown, first-class museum. The Peabody Essex Museum's expansion/renovation program is a positive step that will ensure we all move forward as we enter the next millennium. i :w Sincerely, Annie C. Harris `= Executive Director Lyceum Bar &'GrAl _l November 7, 1996 t Chairman, Salem Planning Board ' F I Dear Chairman, As the owner of a business in downtown Salem, and as a resident of the area, I enthusiastically support the Peabody Essex Museum's expansion plans. From a cultural point of view, it will further enhance Salem's reputation. From an economic viewpoint, it will have a dramatic impact on the area's Bed and Breakfast establishments; shops, hotels, and restaurants: It has been our experience at the Lyceum that the visitor to the Peabody Essex has more discretionary income than the usual Salem tourist and is much more likely to shop, eat or stay in Salem. For example, our business dramatically increased during"The Great Age of Sail"exhibit. We strongly advocate prompt approval of their plans. Sincerely, George rringtonn Owner, Lyceum Bar&Grill 4 43 Church Street Salem, Massachusetts 01970 (508) 745-7665 FAX(508) 744.7699 ROCKETT MANAGEMENT& REALTY CO., INC. 190 PLEASANT STREET MARBLEHEAD,MASS.01945 TEL.(617)631-3070 FAX(617)639-2290 J.HILARY ROCKETT,JR. Vice President November 6, 1996 Salem Planning Board 1 Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Attn: Walter B. Power III, Chairman RE: Peabody Essex Museum Dear Mr. Power, I understand the Peabody Essex Museum is requesting a special permit from the Salem Planning Board for the approval of Phase I of the Museum's plan. I want to state that I am in full support of such a request and look forward to this project beginning as soon as possible. It will certainly have a positive effect for downtown Salem. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me. 'ricer ly, J. a b kett, Jr. Pr side t J JHR:nh SALEM CHAMBER of COMMERCE y 32 Derby Square,Salem,MA 01970-3777.1'elepboue: 508.744,0004.Fax: 508.7453855 November 6, 1996 Mr. Walter Power Chairman City of Salem Planning Board One Salem Green Salem,Massachusetts 01970 Dear Mr. Power: The Salem Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors at their June 11, 1996 meeting voted to endorse the concept of the Peabody Essex Museum's expansion plan. The Board recognized that the Peabody Essex Museum's expansion plan will be the catalyst for dramatic change in the downtown area. The Salem Chamber of Commerce wishes to go on record in support of the Peabody Essex Museum's requestfor a special permit under the Site Plan Review Ordinance for Phase I of the Museum's plan. Sincerely, 2�#ruceHaas ent Citp of Oatem, olaaacbummo r a Office of the Citp Couucit nnacu�' a Citp you p vK�wls( pu b}a�i� �rW'`e� 5 VLOV t�X b resp v Q Ol' /n�20� y lkQ. ho5ec�s �c vv5 G 1 1 t E t5 i C v r[_F r C, raq �. .�,r,5`�- 11s FeP`sl. ( D QQ witlk � aerv�a 1� fU N o� IarGCeY WYE EtiS. Ga V,p14 e_�T o ' row I trek of Sly e�t �� L gy-1he Ye�c�Gl cZG `Cy5 rt We SPK r ° �cL- e s�Y 5 1 1 ' 0VKe- wDvvy Ci N t de ✓s 'W �Vl � Gvi� f �WQ✓� � � C"b �, ,i n''Gd eG+� f ��; � eel ° view v z t y '+ e �vW,✓aYGJe : tWN as l`1 iS 4l✓�n -� 1 UQ. Tu ! 11 � /jr24fG µ ,l II r 7 / tAl& eav Sv{a�av� TyIU�r 5 }U-yyq G vi � e. V/S/U N G� � Uy e- s e.�i vQv Lj�•� n� �G `I '^-E Eco�u �t c.. � � ��S'�tZ'�c L � 11 sLlvE °� SG � .F � c5 n�v SE u, Cavh� , f fo✓ �"`�``�Yy� TO of Oatem, Aa!50aCbu!5ett!9 9 Office of the Citp Councit Citp jbau C),+t �-q, 191 G ave Wr, k, + eKYIUS tai I /c eUA2 v�� n-�.yr �i-t�es`l 1 J- eJ �✓ sperm �e a� P t� e S e �� P14�, Revte zJ �v gip✓ -F -j-4 . f O✓d (VI zz Q �o vere�� l C' Y-ev �((K G j C1�c4 "ire �5 Ure. i Io S,�ewt , F-d D( es, c� JL'UJe 4j tvevl, I C,✓u b 4 J3 G l� U Y-s) 7 „r eV fres ore�Ts , c� vrs I ovs c e.l e v,i-ies laQ �re�o� v r 7—E!-F j7n-e. W U r l Vdi'I.C. G✓oUKj -fie e�� resp VK3) 1 5 . r2.pUs ,�o✓ a re I'KV S er..rf'K CI . �, sex ✓II. u,34-& (�Y li n wtf-1;'t CSN u 17T UV2 QS M� YC�GG� e,5 'i A6 a- v�ew w, (( 10 eo,M e a CV (G� class vK Us ens v C"j Q,H+LP/SeGY ccbbv� e T�vYC a� 5a l erg 6V , [ Walter B. Power, III, Chairman October 16, 1996 Page 3 Wherefore, we respectfully request that the Board grant the Site Plan Review Special Permit for the three properties as requested. Sincerely, THE PEABODY ESSEX MUSEUM By � °�- J hn R. Sera ni, Sr. JRS:jaf Enclosures Walter B. Power, III , Chairman October 16, 1996 Page 2 development designed to celebrate the Museum's 200th anniversary of its founding in 1999. The Third Century Fund is the companion capital campaign for the Plan representing an investment in the future for the Museum in Salem. This Plan will serve as a catalyst for implementing the Downtown Business and Cultural Development Action Plan. The total investment by the Museum toward the implementation of its overall Plan will be in the range of $75 million dollars, which will include $36. 2 million in construction costs. This represents perhaps the single largest private investment ever made in the City. The economic impact on Salem and the region is conservatively estimated to exceed $160 million over the near term. The Essex Block Expansion Plan is critical in that it will allow the Museum's collections and offices to be moved from the main museum buildings on the Liberty Street Block into newly rehabilitated buildings located on the Essex Block. Once this move is completed the Liberty Street Block Expansion and renovation, including the renovation of the Essex Street Plaza, will commence. An architect has just recently been selected and will soon begin the Liberty Street Block design. The plans as filed indicate the details of the proposed rehabilitation of the buildings. Because most of the proposed work is interior work to existing buildings, the applicant requests that the requirement of an Environmental Impact Statement be waived. The proposed plans will not create any additional vehicular traffic flow or circulation through the downtown. During the course of the presentation, all items required under §7-18 will be addressed by the applicant. In conclusion, Salem's rich heritage will be preserved and enhanced by implementation of the Museum's Master Plan, a heritage that encompasses our art and culture and that of people around the world. some of this heritage is known and accessible but much of it has been hidden in storage vaults and archives. The Museum's Plan will bring this cherished and valuable heritage to light and enrich the lives of our children and millions of people over the next century. I SERAFINI, SERAFINI AND DARLING f ATTORNEYS AT LAW k1l 63 FEDERAL STREET l;i,i , SALEM. MASSACHUSETTS 01970 r TELEPHONE JOHN R. SERAFINI.5R. 500-744-0212 JOHN R. SERAFINI.JR. 61 7.351-2743 JOHN E. DARLING TELECOPIER ELLEN M. WINKLER October 16 , 1996 506.7A1-x663 JOSEPH C.GORRENTI Walter B. Power, III, Chairman City of Salem Planning Board One Salem Green Salem, Massachusetts 01970 RE: Application for Special Permit under Site Plan Review Peabody Essex Museum Expansion - Essex Block Dear Mr. Power: On behalf of the Peabody Essex Museum ("Museum") , owners of the properties listed below located in East India Square along Essex Street, hereinafter referred to as the "Essex Block", application is hereby made for a Site Plan Review Special Permit under Section 7-18 of the City of Salem Zoning Ordinance. The properties in question are as follows: 1. 132 Essex Street, The Plummer Hall and Daland House (formerly the Essex Institute) , hereinafter known as the "Library" ; 2. 144 Essex Street, The Rogers Building, hereinafter known as the "Museum Office Center" or "MOC" ; and 3. 2 New Liberty Street, The former Salem Armory Drill Shed, basement storage. The work proposed on these properties is essentially interior rehabilitation of the buildings' mechanical systems and redesign of existing floor space (minimal in the case of the Library and Drill Shed basement) as shown on the plans filed herewith. Exterior changes to the buildings will be minor in nature. The rehabilitation of these buildings referred to as the "Essex Block" , is the first phase of the Plan to transform one of America's oldest and most esteemed museums into a museum for the 21st Century. The Plan will help revitalize Salem and the region through education, economic development, cultural life and recreational opportunities. The Museum's Master Plan is a comprehensive program for expanded facilities and institutional f g "C Mi Ctu of �Ulem, �4'flasEiarhusett5 { z = 1ttnitingnttr� '."ee,MMe.oa One !-5a1C11t (6r££It REQUEST FOR REVIEW COMMENTS SPECIAL PERMIT DATE: TO: ( ) BUILDING INSPECTOR ( ) CONSERVATION COMMISSION J/CITY ENGINEER ( ) Other: ( ) BOARD OF HEALTH Attached please find the application referenced below. The Planning Board re- auests that you review this application relative to Section VII of of the Zoning Ordinance. We would appreciate vour completing the form below and returning it to us. Notice of the public hearing for this application will be forwarded to you. ( ) WETLANDS AND FLOOD HAZARD DISTRICTS (-T--SITE PLAN REVIEW ( ) CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT ( ) BUSINESS PARK DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ( ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPLICANT: PROJECT NAME & ADDRESS: /,,S X CONTACT PERSONS AND PHONE: Applicant: �P?r .��,, �./�_`�F+i�� (Sr iw'� lT CITY: COMMENTS DUE BY: �� ?.�'�`'Y!-C��-! ��%�% �✓ (Fail to comment within 35 days shall be deemd lack of opposition.) ( Concur with proposal (Explain on reverse side) ( ) Need more information (Explain on reverse side) ( ) Cannot concur with proposal (Explain on reverse side) ( ) Comments included i � 4 REVIEWER'S SIGNATU TITLE DATE e z a Planning r�uttr3 01e �aUlem (Breen REQUEST FOR REVIEW COMMENTS SPECIAL PERMIT 9'f)2- DATE: / DATE: //! TO: (/BUILDING INSPECTOR ( ) CONSERVATION COMMISSION ( ) CITY ENGINEER ( ) Other: ( ) BOARD OF HEALTH Attached please find the application referenced below. The Planning Board re- quests that you review this application relative to Section VII of of the Zoning Ordinance. We would appreciate your completing the form below and returning it to US. Notice of the public hearing for this application will be forwarded to you. / ( ) WETLANDS AND FLOOD HAZARD DISTRICTS (1-7 SITE PLAN REVIEW ( ) CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT ( ) BUSINESS PARK DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ( ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPLICANT: /''2G'JU PROJECT NAME & ADDRESS: CONTACT PERSONS AND PHONE: Applicant: 'r: CITY: COMMENTS DUE BY: (Failure to comment within 35 days shall be deemd lack of opposition.) ( oncur with proposal (Explain on reverse side) ( ) Need more information (Explain on reverse side) (. ) Cannot concur with proposal (Explain on reverse side) ( ). Comments included REVIEWER`S SIGNA(UE TITLE DATE a BOARD OF ASSESSORS z _` . . „,' P AGE „CITY HALL 3 01970 4 < DATE-1O-/'23C. 6 ' 6 • ° CERTIFIED ABUTTERS LIST • ) 6 ° SUBJECT—PROPERTY: MAP-35—IST-0-2-3.0—S`UTF-3"0-10 . 3 PROPERTY ADDRESS : 0161 ESSEX STREET ASSESSED OWNER PEABODY MUSEUM " 112 , • „ 13 1 111 0 • „ MAP LOT SUFF PROPERTY ADDRESS ASSESSED OWNER MAILING ADDRESS • ,a 35 0230 301 0161 ESSEX STREET PEABODY MUSEUM 161 ESSEX 'ST 3 • ,6. . . SALEM MA •01970 ` .-' 6 35 0 3`0 302-"0`361 ESSEX STREET PEABODY MUSEUM l76 ESSEX ST R1 • SALEM MA 01970 • 6 35 0230 303 0042 CHARTER STREET PEABODY MUSEUM 161 ESSEX ST a ,3 SALEM MA 097 • p' 35 0209 0158 ESSEX STREET SALEM REDEVELOPMENT AUTH I • z, SALEM MA 01970 5 0210 0144 ESSEX STREET PEABODY MUSEUM OF SALEM AND 16 ESSEX STREET p • ESSEX INSTITUTE INCORPORATED SALEM MA 01970 30 35 0212 801 0002 NEW LIBERTY STREET Ul UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 2 NEW LIBERTY STREET 33 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE SALEM MA 01970 za ., 35 0212 802 0002 NEW LIBERTY STREET U2 MUSEUM COOPERATIVE OF SALEM INC 132 'ESSEX -STREET • a._ .SALEM MA 01970 35 0212 803 0002 NEW LIBERTY STREET U3 MUSEUM COOPERATIVE OF SALEM INC 132 ESSEX STREET 3) • SALEM MA 01970 °B • so 35 0212 804 0002 NEW LIBERTY STREET 114 MUSEUM COOPERATIVE OF SALEM INC 132 ESSEX STREET b SALEM MA 019709r , >41 3 35 0213 0136 ESSEX STREET MUSEUM COOPERATIVE OF SALEM ,INC 132. ESSEX ST ; • SALEM MA 01970 s 35 0604 0002 EAST INDIA SQUARE HERITAGE MUSEUM REALTY TRUST 423 PURITAN ROAD • 36 BELHUMER R THOMAS TR SWAMPSCOTT MA 01907 4 • w 35 0217 0137 ESSEX STREET KIERNAN RUSSELL 135 ESSEX STREET 6 SALEM MA 01970 • 35 0218 0007 LIBERTY STREET PEABODY MUSEUM OF SALEM AND 161 ESSEX STREET_- e - i .r ,�j61 • B;= ESSEX INSTITUTE SALEM MA 01970` 4 35 0219 0024 CHARTER STREET 38 SALEM CITY OF' • <+ ss • 35 0229 0133 ESSEX STREET PEABODY MUSEUM OF SALEM AND 161 ESSEX STREET a ESSEX INSTITUTE INC SALEM MA ;01970 . 57 • a ' 35 0231 0179 ESSEX STREET BERNARDS INC 179 ESSEX STREET • °SALEM MA 01970 e 35 0232 0181 ESSEX STREET PEABODY MUSEUM OF' SALEM 161 ESSEX STREET 81 • SALEM MA 01970 • 6 35 0235 201 0013 CENTRAL STREET ARJOD REALTY TRUST 20 LAUNCHING RD s DRIVAS A J & DRIVAS J A TRS ANDOVER MA 01810 66 • 6'> 35 0236 0017 CENTRAL STREET SALEM CITY OF a. • 61 POLICE STATION ESSEX STREET ONE SEVENTY TFIREE ESSEX ST TR 30 ARTHUR AVENUE • LALLY BARBARA A TR MARBLEHEAD MA 01945 ro „ w n ]6 • 67 PETER M. CARBN • CHIEF ASSESSOR • s e BOARD OF ASSESSORS z , FADE Z p • CITY HALL �. B SALEM, MA 01970 a DATE : 10/23/96 .6 • B CERTIFIED ABUTTERS LIST , • p r B ]; SUBJECT PROPERTY . MAP . 35 LOT: 0230 SIiFF: 301 3p • p PROPERTY ADDRESS: 0161 ESSEX STREET B ' ASSESSED OWNER PEABODY MUSEUM 13 10 ., • a • +5 12_ MAP LOT SUFF PROPERTY ADDRESS ASSESSED OWNER MAILING ADDRESS is 17 13 • ,a 35 0607 0057 CHARTER STREET SALEM REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ;,,, • a p 35 0618 0045 CHARTER STREET PEABODY MUSEUM OF SALEM 161 ESSEX STREET n • 1> SALEM MA 01970 a • 18 35 0262 0043 CHARTER STREET REAR SALEM HOUSING AUTHORITY 27 CHARTER ST za • 1B !, SALEM ,MA 01970 s , 35 0263 0043 CHARTER. STREET PEABODY MUSEUM OF SALEM 161 ESSEX STREET 2] • 2, SALEM. MA 01976 —? <. 4 a 35 0264 0051 CHARTER STREET SALEM CITY OF • a CHARTER ST CEMETERY , • 24 35 0265 0053 CHARTER STREET PEABODY HARLAN B JR 6 FEDERAL CT 22EB.. .< ,... .. SALEM MA_. 01970 , ..:. • a 35 0266 : 0037 CENTRAL STREET CENTURY ASSOCIATES RLTY TRUST 400 MYSTIC AVENUE ' . pp • SLOANE MARSHALL M ET AT, MEDFORD MA 02155 35 0272 0027 CHARTER STREET SALEM HOUSING AUTHORITY 27 CHARTER STREET p] • SALEM MA 01970 • 30 o 31: m m • m • 35 a] sa ae a , .<B W 61 • 9y`x 62 w 63 m ss • • 57 az ss „ _. _... . 8+ • m mm aB (p 67 ap W 62' 6p • ss ro • n m rz ss ss PETER M. CARON • CHIEF ASSESSOR • e e ffOAR=F-1 S"S E-S'SUR S CITY HALL PAGE / 3 _.' SALEM, MA 01970 .- `' '. ';`, ' 4—DATE`-"-1l072'3T96 6 • 5 CERTIFIED ABUTTERS LIST • 8 STTBJE'CT-PROPERTY": MAP": 35 TOT-:-0'2'3-0—Su-FF-.-3-0-1 ° PROPERTY ADDRESS : 0161 ESSEX STREET 0 . ASSESSED OWNER PEABODY MUSEUM 13 ,9 1° .. • • t° MAP LOT SUFF PROPERTY ADDRESS ASSESSED OWNER MAILING ADDRESS 5 ,5 1°• "'17 • „> 35. 0183 801 0016 ;BROWN STREET C11 JONES CAMERSON W 201, WASHINGTON ST SUITE "'304 8 • - - JONES KAREN R SALEM MA 01970 PB B" 3S0`18`3" 8'02 - 0'0 " BROWN"STREET-U-2 JON'E.S"CAMERON-W 2'03-WASFIPNGTON`ST-"St1ITE 3'0' m JONES KAREN R SALEM MA 01970 . • 10 35 0183 803 0016 BROWN STREET U3 BROWN STREET COURT REALTY TRUST P 0 BOX 8230 24 2, DONOVAN-E'DWARD L TR SALEM MA U197L ;r .,,, u • 35 0183 804 0016 BROWN STREET C14 BROWN STREET COURT REALTY TRUST P 0 BOX 8230 • p DONOVAN EDWARD L TR SALEM MA' O1>971 3,, ,..>..,� z 3'5 31-81-8-0'5—"0'Ufi6-BROWN-STREET-LI.5120'DGER'S-J�AME'S-E-&""RITA-L P-0-BOX-4-1 • a CORMIER EUGENE K & MADELEINE T MARBLEHEAD MA 01945 0 35 0183 806 0016 BROWN STREET C16 RODGERS JAMES E & RITA L P 0 BOX 412 31 • 32 COf2MIER-E'tIGENE-IC-&-MA-DE-1E3N-E-T MARBLE'�3'Ez�D-MA UY9'4'5 35 . 02'27 ,801' 0129 ESSEX STREET 01 NUGENT EDMOND B 129 ESSEX,. ST Ill • NANCYB SALEM MA 01970 9'5-6"2-27-8'02-0329-ESSEX STREET-L'1-" " SCANLON-JOSEPH-- SEX-ST-t12 • SCANLON BRENDA SALEM MA 01970 sa • 35 0227 803 0129 ESSEX STREET U3 ZAPPAS MARY 129 ESSEX STREER 11-3 sa SALEM-MA�l3`97 0 ° 4, • ,�e' 35,.x02.27 '804L 0129 ESSEX STREET L14 HART ALICIA 129 ESSEX STREET, SALEM MA 01970 ' 3-1 v4zT 805 012-9-E S'SEX S'TR'E'E T-U5 FLiANAGAN-MARTA MORRI'8 12'9-E'S'S'EX"'ST-U 45 • C/O SCOPA DONNA SALEM MA 01970 a • 56 35 0227 806 0129 ESSEX STREET U6 FATHER MATTS TRUST 129 ESSEX ST U6 °,;'- - K'ELrE'YTGREGORY-ETICELLEY' C-S-TR:S--.--S-ArEM-MA:019�- ,.. ,a ;49 • ` 35' 0227 807 0129 ESSEX STREET C17 ALTSHLILER DAVID A 129 ESSEX STREET '. '39 `50 ALTSHLILER CAROL H SALEM MA 01970 : u • 0 t-5-10-2-2-7-8'08 0'1`2'9 E'S'SE'XfSTR'EET tl' CARAMELL'O DONNA LEE 2'9-E'SSEX`STREET"LT8 5 . 4 SALEM MA 01970 fi0 35 0227 809 0129 ESSEX STREET U9 HINRICHS SANDRA 129 ESSEX ST U9 �, .S`ALEM-MA-0197057 . ! 35 0227 810, 0129 ESSEX STREET U10 SHERMAN WILLIAM A III 129. ESSEX STREET: U10 ,',5 . N .. SHERMAN ELIZABETH E - SALEM .MA .01970 61 ��'5-0 229-8-1-1-03 2'9-E'SSE X=STR EE`P-L13'1 S-fMON-MAR;O 129-E S SE-X'-5'i'-L9-1-1 SALEM MA 01970 52 . 4' 35 0227 812 0129 ESSEX STREET 1112 WRYNN PATRICE 129 ESSEX ST U12 0 . 35 0227 813 0129 ESSEX STREET L113 CARR SARA E 129 ESSEX ST L113 " 5° 61; C/O SLATER SHIRLIE -`: -SALEM MA " 01970 ° --3.5-0-21-2-'-8-8-1----0-002-NEW-LrI-BERTY-STREET-t1-1 L'1N3TE•1�-STATES-O'F-A'MERIC'A 2-NEW-"LYBER:Ti-STREE ' V� ` ' V BO • NATIONAL PARK SERVICE SALEM MA 01970 00 1, n isss '74 o < 57 `.... , •alk ..,., '�"...•. . CHIEF ASSESSOR . � J � 6 6 —B07SR'D—'0'F 1SS'.S�SSDR'. �r PAGE ' CLTY HAL , L , -�• °: SALEM, MA " 01970 a D7STE :-20%3 X796 ° CERTIFIED ABUTTERS LIST ) 99 S U'BJ EC T—PRO P ERTY-c MA P-:-3-5-L'O T-:—O 2-3-0—S U-F F.-3'01 9 • 31.. PROPERTY ADDRESS : 0161 ESSEX STREET 0 . °r ASSESSED OWNER PEABODY MUSEUM .. ; 10 19 • ;, MAP LOT SUFF PROPERTY ADDRESS ASSESSED OWNER MAILING ADDRESS ,e • • 35 0212 '802 0002 NEW LIBERTY STREET 112 MUSEUM COOPERATIVE OF SALEM INC 132 ESSEX STREET 3 . SALEM MA• 01970 " a 3 3•E 0.2T2—"8.0`1'--0-0.0.2`N-EW—L`I'BERTY S'TR'E'ET -t1-I MU'SE-tl'n COOPERATIVE—O`F—SRliEM INC.""`— �'2—E'SSE'X STR'EE 21 • ) SALEM MA 01970 a • a 35 0212 804 0002 NEW LIBERTY STREET U4 MUSEUM COOPERATIVE OE' SALEM INC 132 ESSEX STREET ADEM—MST O 9T0 • �' 35 '0214 201 x. '0120 ESSEX STREET 134 ESSEX INSTITUTE 120 ESSEX STREET ;!8 • . SALEM MA 01970,' p 35° 02"L5 O'007—BftOWNvSTR'E'E ES-S'E'X—`TN IITUT 3 ESS'EX`S. . SALEM MA 01970 31 • 37 20 32 a • 33 99 Q 31 32 � • ca.s. •e , r � •ss n 37; s1 • 41 ss 93 1 58 - _ .. ;: -_ .. _ ;..� n. .o '...a.. , ..... .. a :a: • 88 G4 a 63 +EB ro ]1 w n s]a ` e2� 4s IER :° CAR ;a • CHIEF ASSESSOR . b. , ,. C fu of Salem, Inss�zrl�use##s 4 p �l�nzting �attrD fgnc -Salem 05-ruit N C:1 City of Salem Planning Board Will give a public hearing for all interested parties on the application and plans filed therewith of the Peabody Essex Museum, under Section 7-18, Site Plan Review Special Permit, of the City of Salem Zoning Ordinance. The properties in question are the following: 132 Essex Street, The Plummer Hall and Daland House, hereinafter known as the "Library'; 144 Essex Street, The Rogers Building, hereinafter known as the "Museum Office Center"; and 2 New Liberty Street, the former Salem Armory Drill Shed, basement storage. The work proposed on these properties is essentially interior rehabilitation of the buildings' mechanical systems and redesign of existing floor space(minimal in the case of the Library and Drill Shed basement). Exterior changes to the buildings will be minor in nature. The hearing will be held on Thursday, November 7, 1996, at 7:30 P.M., in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green. This hearing will be held in accordance with Chapter 40A of the Massachusetts General Laws and the Rules and Regulations of the City of Salem. Walter B. Power. III /-E 0 Chairman October 24 and 31 Please send invoice to: Attorney Joseph Correnti Serafini, Serafini and Darling 63 Federal Street Salem, MA 01970 Th Is notice pta .,jod cen °(){f'C+FA 0tsi?otln Board" C" Hall Ave., Won,, ���:;�. .gin OCT `L 4 1996 at fij?,4177In ^ ctmp, 30 set`. ►- D ,CON I ♦ �}C/�yyy 'J����7����Jp��}{�C!y*r{��} 1T 1T OCT 2 4 1996 ` CITY OF SALEM s Planning �3sarb HEALT?-l.DEPT. Ae�lMMF.� Our �$alelrt Gran 1999 REQUEST FOR REVIEW COMMENTS �,� SPECIAL PERMIT DATE: TO: ( ) BUILDING INSPECTOR ( ) CONSERVATION COMMISSION ( ITY ENGINEER ( ) Other: ( ;"BOARD OF HEALTH Attached please find the application referenced below. The Planning Board re- quests that you review this application relative to Section VII of of the Zoning Ordinance. We would appreciate vour completing the form below and returning it to us. Notice of the public hearing for this application will be forwarded to you. / ( ) WETLANDS AND FLOOD HAZARD DISTRICTS (�T SITE PLAN REVIEW ( ) CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT ( ) BUSINESS PARK DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ( ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPLICANT: PROJECT NAME & ADDRESS: CONTACT PERSONS AND PHONE: Applicant: , �rCITY: - COMMENTS DUE BY: /�%�.ti;•"Yi/�t_`� i= C�� (Failure to comment within 35 days shall be deemd lack of opposition.) ( ) concur with proposal (Explain on reverse side) (K Need more information (Explain on reverse side) ( ) Cannot concur with proposal (Explain on reverse side) ( ) Comments included A)or/Pn�r 6-1'• / i/ 8:.30/.^x. REVIEWER`S SIGNATURE TITLE DATE CITY OF SALEM BOARD OF HEALTH Salem, Massachusetts 01970-3928 JOANNE SCOTT,MPH,RS,CHO NINE NORTH STREET HEALTH AGENT - Tei:(508)741-1800 Fax:(508)740-5705 OCT 2 5 1996 October 25, 1996 `6B`�''f7 6'u�siu6eY€ Attorney Joseph Correnti 63 Federal Street Salem,MA 01970 Dear Attorney Correnti: The Board of Health requests your presence at the next board of Health meeting to be held Tuesday,November 12, 1996 at 8:30 p.m. at the Bowditch House,9 North Street, 1st floor conference room. The discussion will be the request for review comments - site plan review The Peabody Essex Museum "Essex Block" located at 132 Essex Street, 144 Essex Street and 2 New Liberty Street. If you have any questions,kindly contact this office at 741-1800. Sincerely, FOR THE BOARD OF HEALTH oanne Scott Health Agent JS/bas cc: George H. Levesque,Chairman and Members Beth Debski,Planning Department Qtg of J$31c t, massac4usttts l rn Mlfirt of tot (Qitg @found( '�3,r�nns (IIitg �inll COUNCILLORS-AT-LARGE JOHN J.DONAHUE WARD COUNCILLORS PRESIDENT 1996 DEBORAH E.BURKINSHAW 1996 THOMAS H.FUREY ,C`Ep KEVIN R.HARVEY Novemffrt /th, 1996 PETER L.PASKOWSKI SCOTT J.MCLAUGHLIN REGINA R.FLYNN STANLEY J.USOVICZ,JR. JOHN J.DONAHUELEONARD F O'LEARY Walter B. Power, 111, Chairman WILLIAM A.KELLEY ARAH M. City of Salem Planning Board SMARK E.BLAIRS One Salem Green Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Re: Application for Special Permit under Site Plan Review Peabody Essex Museum Dear Mr. Power, I am writing this letter regarding the above referenced Application because I am unable to attend the November 7th Planning Board Meeting. My interests regarding the construction and rehabilitation on those sites concern primarily, the air-conditioning unit(s)that will be installed on the roof of Plummer Hall. It is my understanding after speaking to Mr. Joseph C. Correnti of Serafini, Serafini and Darling, the law firm representing the Peabody Essex Museum in this application, and Mr. Craig Wheeler, the Salem City Planner,that no final okay will be given on that construction this evening due to the fact that they have just hired a sound specialist to measure what the decibel level will be of the proposed units. I ask that the Planning Board not give its permission for that construction to take place until the neighborhood and myself are able to review the results of the testing. It is also my understanding that the construction proposed to the basement of the National Park Visitors Center will not include any exhaust fans, or any other exterior construction at that site. The construction and rehabilitation of the three sites, 132 Essex Street, 144 Essex Street, and 2 New Liberty Street will meet all Salem City codes, regulations and guidelines for such construction, taking special note of the fact that this work goes on in densely settled neighborhoods of single and multi-family homes. With these provisions, I have at this writing no other comments. Sin rel Re a 12 F1 Wa T Ci C cillor f - 11/07/96 THU 19:22 FAX 508 741 4683 SERAFINI&DARLING Z 002 xWO FOR WALTER AGENDA/SPEAKERS 1, Planner should read the application and reference all correspondence received. 2. John R. Serafini, Sr. , opening remarks (5 - 7 minutes) 3, Dan Monroe, Executive Director of Peabody Essex Museum (3 - 5 minutes) 4. 5. Alli RiZvi, architect - brief overview of plans (10 - 15 minutes) 6. Preliminary questions from the Board 7, open hearing to public t/ a. Mayor Neil Harrington b, City Council President John Donahue j c. Councillor at Large Kevin Harvey A/�, d, Councillor at Large Thomas Furey e, any other Councilloeso Peeandtresidents f, Downtown business p P g, any other persons g, Questions from the Board to the Applicant • ,/ �Ylf'y Al�da5�L — Page 2 — We appreciate the opportunity to express our concerns to the Redevelopment Authority and look forward to the input of both the Authority and the Design Review Board. The Planning Board will take no action on this proposal until we receive your comments and those of the Design Review Board. Sincerely yours,( Walter B. Power, III Chairman 7 a \9� m k<afM GMT @aWMIPT[I. TLL1T February 24, 1986 Ms. Joan Boudreau Chairperson, Salem Redevelopment Authority One Salem Green Salem, MA. 01970 Re: Peabody Museum Addition Dear Ms. Boudreau:, On Thursday, February 20, the Planning Board held a public hearing under the Site Plan Review process on the proposal of the Peabody Museum to add 27,000 square feet of exhibit space. The plan is an interesting and exciting proposal for the museum and the City. The Planning Board would like to work cooperatively with the Redevelopment Authority and Design Review Board in mutually addressing concerns raised during reviews of this plan. While the Board is supportive of the proposal , there are several areas of concern which we would like to raise regarding the Charter Street elevation. It is vitally important that this elevation be as aesthetically and architecturally pleasing as possible. Specifically, our concerns are as .follows: 1) The Planning Board believes that the garden area presently ' existing on the Charter Street side should be retained and possibly enhanced and enlarged. 2) The Board also believes that the windows as shown have the �- appearance of filled panels. The Board would prefer architecturally pleasing recesses, such as narrow, vertical, recessed areas. 3) With regard to the loading dock, the Board is supportive of the attempts by the architect to soften the visual impact of this area. However, the Planning Board would like to suggest that copper be considered in the canopy design. The use of copper would be compatible with the Oriental theme of the overall building. 4) The Board would also suggest that paving block or some other interesting paving material be considered for the parking and other hot—top areas to soften the expanse of the bituminous material presently proposed. o, 0 , \© • WINDOW KEY: I 11m 1 . REPLACE WINDOW ❑ TO MATCH EXISTING. �. a NEW STOREFRONT IN EXISTING OPENING. 3❑. NEW: ENTRY SIMILAR . TO STOREFRONT. a 11 , , ® -,. NEW WINDOW IN NEW MASONRY OPENING. 5❑ NEW WINDOW IN ,i, EXISTING DOOR OPENING. " , s PATCH BELOW SILL. "__ ': © NEW DOOR IN EXISTING ' WINDOW OPENING. 7❑. NEW DOOR IN NEW s . MASONRY OPENING j I NOTE .: NEW ASPHALT SHINGLE t - ROOF, REMOVE AND REINSTALL SNOW FENCE. . .sr za.,. . 4D . n ` ® �/ 5 4 3 2 1 , '" '' . 11 11 © :`i Y-• . "� I . ,. -i ' / .. : i - - 19'-9" 11'-6" �+� 13'-0" - 11'-9" �� - 11'-6" + .. I I I I I - CAP CHIMNEYS W/ STONE - -- -__ TO MATCH EXISTING, TYPICAL. I' ll _ w 7 1 _.. RIDGE VENT " `4 _= ___ _. - - I -= = I I 0 LEAD COATED COPPER 4 - _ _ .. ELEVATOR PENTHOUSEIM - --" I . _. _T -- -- r - I _ - - - -.T._ .T. _ —T - __L_ . -- � - - _ - - T - - - - - _ - - = - _ _7 _ Ir - _ _ I I I - - 7. - NEW ASPHALT SHINGLE . , _ _ - _ - - __ = - _ _ --- DORMER WALL, TYPICAL11 c - _ - _ -- _ - _ - - - _ _ -T = D - _ : . __ - _ ATTIC FLOOR — - -: - �- 60'-6" _ ALUMIN M GUTTE E _ ._ = _ -== - - MIDGETULOUVERSR _ _ _ _ . _ _ - -T -r � .�_. - _ __ . - _ - _ ' - --- -- : _. . . . -- --_ . . ._.__ ._ : - -- - - - - _ --__- - r -_- � ® 16" 0 C �� NEW COPPER GUTTER - r Y -� = - - - - - _ - - -- -- - _ - - -- - - -- - - , _ _. _ - - ---- - - - -- - _... . _ __ _ _ - _ - - - - - -- :- - - r : _ VERS - .=: _. __� .» -J---- . - -- -- . MIDGET LOU - - -- -- - r ._. . --- - -- - _. - — - _ - - - _ -: ' - _. . - - __. -. - -- - - t __ - ---- - _ . .- - -- ---' . -- . - - - -- -- ---- ._ --__ - ® 16 0.C. r _ '� p. - - __ '_: -- - - - . . - ._ .- - - =. r _ - - - - _ --.,-. - --_ -_ . .-_-- . . _ _ -__.._ --- ----- ---. j 1_:_ _-::_ j r- __. . ___ _. ,�= ; __. _ - ❑ .- ::-:_. ❑ i___ :.-' :='_:_-- - --- -_ _ _ -= - _ . ._: WOOD PRIVACY . :, `' , ` ' t _ -- - -- r 11 � ___ _ . - _ - LATTICE SCREENS _ --- - - - - _' --- - �j �-'-T_: _ _ _ - - - - - � ���] - :' , ,. - _ -- - - - - - - - - - _ _ ' . _ . I . . _ ' _ _ _ - _ - r - - - _ _ _ — _ _ _ _ — � . _ _- -_:— - — -- _-r- - _ . .-__._ _ :_. '_ -_-. _. --__ _..—.5. - -_ T-._.. _ ... _S:_ r�Z� I: `�3._ _ T--T. _ i' __ _ _ __ __ - - r... .. ..._.- - - --_- __._____. —_— .__. ___ --' i--- __-_ _. ..__ ._ __ - -•- ____ _ - - _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ r FLOOR - - 3 d L00 -_ • - -__ __ . . ._ . . _ . __ _ _ __ _ . __._ _- . - _ , _ I I _ _ - - -- - .- - -- --- -_ -_. - .. - - - - - - - - - 49 -10 1 2 - - -- = - - _ - - .- -- ----- - _ --- - , _ __ . --- - s -- - - _ _ . - j r � 1 - -- - : : " REMOVE EXISTING BRICK - _ —_ _ - -- _ _ - - - _ __ _ _ - - -' -_ _ - -- T - _ CAREFULLY AND SAVE _ : =_ _ - _ —_ -- -- - _ - _ :: _ . . -__ - - - - - ' - TO RE-USE ELSWHERE - - - _. - - - -1 - --- -- -- -:._.: _ _ - - c - - -- - -- -- - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - _7 AS REQUIRED, TYP. __ . _ _. . --- _ .--- - - = -- Q I - - - - _ - _.. ® - _ . . - - __. . . - -- -- . _ . - - - - : : r — T -- - - - -_ - -- - - - - - - : _ - - - - - - - - - - REINSTALL EXISTING BRICK c ._;_: - : _ : -, -: - - - . . - , : : �_ . _: -: : . . : :- _ _ ; 4 I IN 1 ' AREA AROUND WINDOW ___ - -:_ _ _ - - _ . - _ _ _ - - _- - _ I == _ :_ _-= i • Bill Luster suggested that Denise go out there and take a look at the site. Walter Power suggested that Saturday morning would be good. Bill Luster suggested that they leave it up to Denise and Walter to see what could be done it would save the developer some time since the batch plants will be closing soon. Mr. DiBiase agreed that would be fine with him. Old/New Business Lee Harrington announced that he is resigning from the Planning Board effective this evening. He explained that his appointment was up in May and he has been traveling a lot for his business. Walter Power and the Board Members thanked Mr. Harrington for his years of service, and noted that he will be missed. Mr. Harrington noted that he enjoyed his 8 years of service. There being no further business to come before the Planning Board at this meeting a motion was made by John Moustakis and seconded by Bill Cullen to adjourn the meeting. The motion was approved unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 11:30 p.m Respectfully submitted by: ® Eileen M. Sacco, Clerk n Salem Planning Board PBl01900 Page 18 of 18 Mr. DiBiase noted that Mr. Barrett has the worst of the grade and Mr. McCarthy has a large tree in front of his house. Bill Luster noted that it is not a cut through street and there would not be a huge amount of people using this. Walter Power noted that he was up there today and that road widens out in front of those three houses and noted that he doesn't see why a sidewalk can't be put there. He stated that he felt that the Board would be derelict if the Board didn't require sidewalks when they can. He stated that there is no reason to take down any trees to do this and they could easily put a sidewalk in, as there is plenty of room Mr. DiBiase explained that he is trying to give the neighbors some consideration since they have been great neighbors for the last year. He explained the logistics of the locations of the sidewalks in relation to the houses where the neighbors do not want the sidewalks. Walter Power explained his opinion on the installation of the sidewalks and how this could be done. Bill Cullen suggested that Mr. Barrett speak on the matter since they are here to oppose this. Mr. Barrett stated that he and his wife and his son were here at the public hearing and at no time did the Planning Board tell him that he was going to • have anything done to his section of Patton Road. He noted that all he cared about was that the pavement is replaced because of the utilities and he understood that would be done. He explained that they have had no trouble in the past with the neighborhood,noting that the kids in the neighborhood play basketball out there. He stated that he feels that they should have been notified and that consideration should be given to the people who have lived on that street and if they don't want to have the sidewalks they should not be forced to have one. He noted that in the past the city has determined that damage would be done to his property. Walter Power stated that the sidewalk would not be on Mr. Barrett's property- Bill ropertyBill Luster suggested that the Board should take a look at it. Denise Sullivan agreed that she would like to check this out as well. Mr. DiBiase suggested that if they can find a way to negotiate the trees that would be fine. Mr. Barrett also noted that one neighbor is handicapped and goes out every day to visit the Council on Aging. . Page 17 of 18 . Chuck Puleo asked if the city has enough staff to cover the clerk of the works. Denise Sullivan stated that she is comfortable that the Clerk of the Works can handle the project. Walter Power referred to the MOU and Atty. Correnti noted that there are some things in the MOU that have changed, noting that they would not want to be held to some dates, for example the approval of the Planning Board was supposed to be in 1999. He outlined some changes that have been agreed upon by the Mayor. He explained that the payment for the parking garage would be 60 days from the deeding of Liberty Street. Bill Luster asked how the Board could insure that the money is used for a deck or garage at Church Street. He reviewed the MOU language regarding the money. Atty. Correnti stated that they have no control over what the city does with the money when they receive it. Walter Power stated that he would like to see something written into the decision regarding that. Denise Sullivan reviewed language regarding Essex Street becoming a two way and supporting and assisting the Board in that endeavor. Bill Luster moved that the Museum offer an easement to the city that will protect the Public Garden in its current form, seconded by Lee Harrington. The board was denied 3-4. • Bill Cullen moved to approve the draft decision for the Peabody Essex Museum as amended, seconded by Gene Collins and approved unanimously. Mr. Grimes addressed the Board and stated that this is going to be a great project and thanked the Board for the time and effort that they put into the review of the project. Discussion Pertaining to a Form C Decision for Patton Road Extension Mr. Paul DiBiase addressed the Planning Board and noted that he wanted to discuss an issue that has come up in the Patton Road Subdivision. He explained that item 7C of the decision calls for the construction of a sidewalk on the north side of Patton Road from Surrey Road until the beginning of the Patton Road Extension. He stated that there are a couple of neighbors that are opposed to the construction of the sidewalk and feel it would be intrusive to their property. He noted that they would have to cut down substantial trees. He suggested in lieu of construction of the sidewalk to overlay a portion of Patton Road to offset the cost for the construction of the sidewalk. He noted that Mr. John Barrett is present tonight and he is opposed to the sidewalk. Bill Luster asked if the sidewalk would be going up towards Mr. Barrett's house. Mr. DiBiase stated that it would be that way. Mr. Luster noted that there is a grade different there. Page 16 of 18 . He noted that they took a condition in DRB that the building would either be improved or screened by the Museum He also explained that there would be tree plantings etc. and they want it to look nice. Atty. Correnti stated that he would take a condition that they talk to the building owner. Bill Luster noted that DRB decision is included in the Planning Board decision. Mr. McDermott asked about the brick on the mall and the light fixtures. He explained that his understanding of the DRB decision was that the new brick would be more compatible with the addition. He referred to the plan and pointed out the locations of the new brick and suggested that a portion of the brick remain the city hall brick that is presently used. He also noted that he felt that it is a mistake to have incompatible lighting and noted that these 5 or 6 lights should be consistent with the rest of the downtown, as well as the 6 in the Public Garden. Walter Power declared the Public Hearing closed at this time. Walter Power read a letter from Councillor at Large Tom Furey in support of the project into the record. The Board reviewed the draft decision for the project. Lee Harrington referred to amendment#2 and asked that any changes to the plan • be approved by 2/3 of the Planning Board. Denise Sullivan reviewed the draft decision. She stated that they would add a condition that the Museum will develop a comprehensive downtown sign program for the city under the direction of the City Planner. Walter Power suggested that the construction management plan submitted by the Museum be included in the decision. Gene Collins asked if they were going to have a dust control plan. Atty. Correnti noted that in the Board of Health decision there is a plan for dust control, vehicle washing and street sweeping. Walter Power stated that he would like to put a condition in that the Marine Arts Building be given an easement. Denise Sullivan stated that they would word that as "free and clear access". She explained that there is an easement that runs with the property for access in that area. Atty. Correnti suggested that there is unrestricted access for 135 Essex Street. Walter Power stated that he would like that to go with the property so as not to affect the value of the property. Bill Luster noted that the Board is trying to protect his legal rights and the Board has done that with the condition because the Museum will have to come back to the Board for approval to change that. Atty. Correnti agreed to that condition. • Page 15 of 18 . Arty. Correnti noted that the signage plan for this project is not included in this package and they are required to have the SRA and the DRB approve them and they will be going back to them. He also noted that they would be working and assisting on a comprehensive downtown signage program Walter Power asked what kind of monetary support they would be willing to provide. Atty. Correnti noted that he did not specify a number because they have already started working on that and they would take a condition that they would participate and assist on the signage program. Chuck Puleo noted that there is the concern that Essex Street becomes a two way and questioned if the Board should put a condition on that. Bill Luster stated that it would be tough to place a condition that would make the street a two way or the project can't move forward. He explained that it would put them in a position of having a decision that requires the street to be two way and if the council denies that then they cannot get a building permit. Bill Luster suggested that a condition could be included that says that the Museum will provide engineering assistance and be a proponent of the change to the two way. Chuck Puleo stated that he didn't want to see the city left having to change a situation that never should have happened. He also pointed to the Walgreens project where the council did not approve the suggestion of the Board. Walter Power warned that there are several places in the city that need attention • regarding traffic and he would like to see the council make Essex Street a two way and they really have to push for that. Denise Sullivan stated that the Board has done their job in reviewing the plan and making recommendations is all that they can do. If the City Council feels that they cannot agree to that,then it will be up to them to decide how to address the issue. Atty. Correnti stated that they remain firm in their commitment to stand side by side with the Planning Board and lend any support that is needed to get this matter through the City Council. Walter Power asked if there was anyone present that would like to make a final statement. Staley McDermott addressed the Board and asked if there was a copy of the proposed condition and suggested that the word"meeting" be changed to "hearing", noting that the public cannot speak at a public meeting, but they can speak at a hearing. He also asked about the two sides of the marine arts gallery that will be opened by demolition and what is going to be done with those facades. Atty. Correnti stated that the Saccons building will have the brick cleaned and they are working with the owner, and the other side will be cinder block. He noted that there are going to be meetings with the owner of the other building to see how he would like his property handled. Page 14 of 18 . A business man from downtown addressed the Board and stated that he felt that the Museum has done a good job with the plans and he felt that the language makes him feel comfortable with that. He also noted that is a little concerned and would like to make sure that businesses are not put out of business because of this expansion. Bill Luster asked if this was the only issue of concern to the Board, suggesting that if it is the only one, we should move on and try and get this done tonight. Lee Harrington stated that he would like to see something written that would allow residents to have free admission to the museum in perpetuity. He stated that he is concerned about that. Bill Luster suggested that they use the same language in the MOU regarding that. Lee Harrington noted that the MOU is until 2007 or 2008. Atty. Correnti stated that there are a lot of things that are going on at the Museum Lee Harrington stated that he wants to see the Museum to have free general admission for Salem residents. Atty. Correnti stated that he felt that would be a decision of the Board of Directors and they are asking them to make a decision that is not theirs to make. Denise Sullivan stated that she is not sure that we can ask the Museum through SPR to provide free admission to Salem residents or if it is legal. Atty. Correnti noted that all school children in Essex County are let in free and that has been expanded since the MOU. Bill Luster stated that he senses a move and he would agree to that to move the decision, noting that there are a couple of conditions that the Board has discussed and he would offer an amendment to ask for an easement and have a vote on that and if that fails then he would be perfectly willing to support the plan because it is a wonderful plan. He suggested that if they have a draft decision and we know what the conditions are that we would place on the draft decision then we should move it tonight. Bill Luster suggested a motion to approve the decision with whatever amendments people tend to agree on and he would offer an amendment that would ask for an easement which could then be voted on as an amendment. Bill It Cullen asked what kind of a majority of the Board would be needed on that. Denise Sullivan suggested that the Board should close the Public Hearing if there are no other issues to be dealt with. She also suggested that they should vote on some amendments first. Walter Power stated there was one other issue that he would like to address and that is the issue of signage relative to traffic around Museum Place. Denise Sullivan reported that the city is looking at a signage program that will direct • people around town. Page 13 of 18 • Bill Luster stated that he does not think that this would come remotely close to re- negotiating the MOU. He noted that he has read it and he does not think it would be a legal nightmare for the city to accept an easement. He acknowledged that there is some protection here but he does not feel that it is enough. He also noted that it is not the intent for his suggestion to put a$65 million dollar project in peril and suggested that we should find some other language. He stated that he felt that museums are making a poor decision in not giving that park to us in a more protective way than they are doing and it raises questions in his mind as to the motivation of that decision. Lee Harrington asked if, after all is said and done, would the Museum entertain deed the park to the city for $1.00. Atty. Correnti stated that he could not comment on that at this time. Atty. Correnti stated that he felt that it was illegal for the Planning Board condition approval that if changes are to be made that any further site plan reviews go to City Council. He also stated that he felt that the analysis of 30B and there is a process that needs to be done if the value exceeds a certain dollar value. Yes it can be done and has been done in the past. He noted that they agree on the importance of this and tried to get language to address that. Walter Power read the proposed condition drafted by the Planning Department into the record as follows: The museum shall provide continuous and open pedestrian access between Essex Street and Charter Street through the Public Garden as shown on plans submitted herewith as a condition of this decision. The pedestrian access shall be open to the public 24 hours a day,seven days a week, 356 days a year. The museum shall maintain the walkways and keep them free from debris and the access shall be adequately lighted at all limes by the museum, The museum shall not substantially change, alter, restrict, or amend the pedestrian access as shown on the plan unless and until such changes alterations, restrictions or amendments are first approved by 2/3's majority of the Planning Board members after public notice and meeting. Any such proposed changes must demonstrate that unrestricted pedestrian access shall be maintained Bill Luster stated that he felt that the condition would have more of an effect it there is an easement in there. Bill Cullen stated that he felt that we are changing the law if we sent the decision making process to the City Council. He questioned what an easement does that the language does not. He asked if the language covers the Board in the future. Bill Luster agreed that the language would cover the Board and they would have • to come back with a substantial change. Page 12 of 18 • Bill Luster stated that he wants to protect the magnificence of the plan with the Public Garden. Walter Power stated that he felt that the city would be getting some value for giving up the street. He explained the location and the detours that have to be done due to giving up the street. He noted that he felt that the city should be able to count on that access for as long as they want it. Atty. Correnti agreed with Mr. Powers and suggested that they approve this plan and any significant changes to the plan have to come back to the Board. John Moustakis asked that the Board get a ruling from the City Solicitor for some language on this. Bill Luster noted that the City Solicitor has approved the language that is being used. Bill Cullen stated that he has listened to all of the debate on this issue and noted that in 20 years there will be a different Board looking at this and maybe there might be a good reason that they want to do something different with this and the mechanism for that is there. He doesn't think that we can predict anything forever, and if changes are needed in 20 years let them handle it as they see fit. He suggested that maybe the Planning Department and Atty. Correnti could work out some language. • Denise Sullivan stated that she did not think that the Board should tie a Planning Board in 20 years to something that might not be viable at that time. Bill Cullen also noted that we can't foresee the future and there could be some kind of catastrophe in this area which may require a change to this, and the Board in 20 years is going to look at this decision and see that they can't change it. Joe Walsh, Aide to Mayor Usovicz addressed the Planning Board and noted that the Mayors office and the Planning Department confer on the project regularly. He noted that they agree that the Public Garden is what makes the project. He also noted that either way it is done whether it is how the museum words it or the condition that the Planning Department crafted the idea is the same and we want to keep that access open. He also noted that with regards to an easement,we would be getting dangerously close to renegotiating the MOU, and that there are things in that document that we all may have liked to see different,but the good thing about it is that it gave the idea the we want this pedestrian access in perpetuity, and if it is going to change it comes back to the Planning Board for approval. He noted that the Mayor is comfortable with the language proposed by the Planning Department. Gene Collins stated that his concern is that the businesses and the pedestrians and the activities on the water front are not cut off from the rest of the city. • Page 11 of 18 Atty. Correnti explained that they went through extensive discussions and negotiations with two city administrations and two mayors, and held a public hearing on Liberty Street. He noted that there was never discussion or negotiation regarding transferring the Liberty Street property and the Museum giving an easement. He stated that they understand the Board and the city's concern about pedestrian access. He also noted that they do not want to get into 30B type issues about granting of rights, property rights and acquiring land and having to place values on those lands. He suggested that they review the language that has been prepared by the Planning Department, noting that they are in agreement 99%. Mr. Luster noted that the 1% is of critical importance. He stated that the fact that the Museum doesn't want to provide a dedicated deeded right of way or easement raises suspicions as to why they won't go for that 1%. Atty. Correnti stated that he felt that this is changing the whole deal that was negotiated for the discontinuance of Liberty Street. He explained that several public hearings were held with the City Council and they did not require an easement in the MOU. Mr. Luster disagreed noting that because they have discussed this with two administrations and the Council does not mean that he has to accept that they did not miss something, and he believes that what they missed is that this decision says that the Museum only has to provide for alternate all hours exterior pedestrian walkways between Essex and Charter Streets. He also stated that he feels that the way this plan works is to provide a real solid easement or right of way. Atty. Correnti suggested that the Board review the language of the decision. Denise Sullivan explained that when the concern was raised at the last meeting she took a shot at wording a condition that would address this. John Moustakis explained that he feels that over the years the Board has approved plans and then things change and Board has no recourse. Bill Luster reviewed the language in the condition that Denise Sullivan provided. He noted that the condition says the same thing as provide for an alternate all hours exterior pedestrian walkway between Essex and Charter Street. Denise Sullivan explained that the intention was to stress in the decision that the Public Garden is important and does sell on the plan, and that under site plan review that if something were to change it would come back to the Planning Board, with the understanding that this decision would stress the importance of this Public Garden for the Planning Board to vote on the plan. She explained that any changes to the Public Garden would trigger site plan review. A discussion was held on the process of changing a plan and the review of the City Planner who would determine if there were substantial enough change to go back to the Planning Board. She also noted that the Planning Department has talked with the Mayor about an easement and he is not in favor of an easement because there are a lot of issues involved. • Page 10 of 18 Bill Luster referred to the MOU and noted that he sees this as giving the Museum a unilateral ability to close the interior walkway on September 23, 2007. Atty. Correnti stated that it has been extended a year. Atty. Correnti noted that is would be up for discussion. Bill Luster stated that he thought that was fair since it is the museum's property and the Public Garden is of critical importance to him He noted that condition#3 provide for an alternate all hours exterior pedestrian walkway between Essex and Charter Street. He noted that in 2007 the only obligation to get pedestrians from Essex Street to Charter Street is an alternate all hours exterior pedestrian walkway between Essex and Charter Street and that arguably could be the walkway that runs through the public garden. He stated that he does not believe that is enough for the businesses from Charter Street down and would hinder the city's vision to connect the downtown to the water front. He suggested that he would like to see the city given an easement on the entire public garden that insures if that entire Public Garden is not open to the public as it is today, then at least the City Council would have an opportunity to discuss why that is not so. He stated that the MOU does not give him any reason to think that we shouldn't want that. Atty. Correnti stated that he understands the concern about always wanting to maintain the access. He stated that the museum is committed to always maintaining access through that area. He noted that this happens to be the . configuration right now and that his concern about an easement was that if this ever changes the commitment never changes for access at all times. He also noted that there is other language that is going to be proposed as a condition that would address that. He stated that he agrees that they want more than what the MOU indicates and they understand that. Bill Luster stated that he is committed to the fact that he believes that the Museum has no other plans for the area of the Public Garden since they are investing a lot of money in it. He noted though that it could change and the City does not have the ability then to get the interior walkway back or Liberty Street because of the agreement. He stated that he felt that we do have the ability to condition this against that public garden is important to create the replacement for Liberty Street, and even if that replacement is simply for pedestrian passage he wants to offer an amendment that provides that entire width with the design like that that shows with the understanding that if that is to be changed and it can change,that is goes to the City Council for review and discussion. Atty. Correnti stated that he agreed with everything Mr. Luster said up to the point that it should go to the City Council. He explained that a 60 foot wide easement is not acceptable to the Museum, noting that perpetual access and a condition that says that that there always must be pedestrian access is acceptable. • Page 9 of 18 • Denise Sullivan stated that she did not think that the Planning Board,through its decision could make the sausage vendor move. Chuck Puleo referred to the Memorandum of Understanding and the section that refers to the dedicate the proceeds from the sale of the empire parking lot to complete the design and construction of the parking structure on Church Street. He asked when that would be taking place. Denise Sullivan noted that the parking lot has not been transferred yet and the administration has been working with the Museum to set up a date for that to happen. The City has held off on the transfer so that they could have use of that parking lot for the month of October and the Museum agreed to that. Mr. Puleo asked where the money would go when it is received. Denise Sullivan stated that the city would set up a new account for that money and it would be used for the parking structure on Church Street. Bill Luster stated that the difficulty with that is that the cost purchasing the Empire lot and the contribution towards the parking deck both happen over a 10— 20 year period that don't really start until the city decides to build a parking lot or deck, so it could happen or it could never happen, but that is the city's obligation. Walter Power noted that Councillor Flynn need to leave at this time but she would like to address the Board. • Councillor Regina Flynn addressed the Board and asked that the Board considers the impact on the residents and businesses are kept foremost in their decision. She noted that traffic congestion and parking are of concern. She also requested at the last meeting that the museum have an informational meeting for the immediate neighborhood on the construction schedule with regards to trucks in the neighborhood etc. and the museum has agreed to that. She also noted that money needs to be set aside for signage that would direct people at St.Peter's street and parking as well as improvements that need to be made on Essex Street and the intersection of Essex and Hawthorne Boulevard. She asked that they be cautious about the intersection and the width of the turn at New Liberty and Essex, as that seem to be quite abrupt to her. John Moustakis asked what the reason is for moving the parking spaces from one side of Essex Street to the other. Atty. Correnti stated that part of the reason is that because they anticipate such a heavy pedestrian flow into the public garden through the arch and into the garden and at the corner where the bell is,the sidewalk needed to be widened to accommodate that. He explained the locations on the plan and the reasons for the moving of the spaces. The Board held a discussion on various situations that could arise with traffic and parking in that area. • Page 8 of 18 • Councillor Regina Flynn asked if the City would be responsible for the cost of the changes to Essex Street. Atty. Correnti explained that the Museum would pay for the resetting of the curbing and build all of the sidewalks and rebuilding of sidewalks as needed. Councillor Flynn asked if the road would be repaved and if the traffic light would be paid for. Atty. Correnti stated that they are not sure if the road would have to be re-paved. As far as the traffic light improvements,they have had their engineers look at that and there are several options and they would like to be able to work with the city on that, he noted that they would take a conditions that the Museum would install the light to Mass Highway standards, facing down Essex Street. Atty. Correnti explained that there are a few options that are acceptable for that area and it depended on the condition of the existing hardware and how things were wired presently, and they feel that they will not have to go out and buy new equipment. He noted that in any event they would be responsible for that. Gene Collins asked how much of an encroachment would the new sidewalk be on the roadway. Laura Celano explained that the present sidewalk is 8 feet and they are adding 6 feet to that,creating a 22 foot driving area. They explained the areas where the street will be widened. Mr. Collins expressed concern over the right of way. • Walter Power questioned if the street would narrow to the end near Hawthorne Boulevard. Atty. Correnti stated that it would be if it were left unchanged. In order to get eight-foot parking the city requires 30 feet. Atty. Correnti noted that the City Planner and the Mayor are in favor of this plan and noted that they will be working on this together. Denise Sullivan noted that the recommendation will be made to the City Council by the Planning Department, and the City Planner feels strongly that this has to happen and there will be a lot of push from the administration to get this passed. Walter Power noted that the location of the bell is in a much better location than previously planned. He noted that this would tend to make this a meeting area and asked if there was much seating planned around the bell. Atty. Correnti noted that the DRB had the same comment. Laura Celano explained the seating that they have planned,which are simple granite non backed benches, so that there would be no barriers. Lee Harrington asked if the Museum owned all of the land around Armory Park. Atty. Correnti noted that the city owns that area. Mr. Harrington suggested that we should ban sausage vendors from that area. Bill Luster stated that he thinks that there is a court order that gives that sausage vendor that space. • Page 7 of 18 • Walter Power asked if the sidewalk that is being widened down to just past the park, and the plans are going to recommend two way traffic on Essex Street with a recommended right hand turn on Hawthorne Boulevard at the lights, going to Derby Street. He stated that he was concerned that there was adequate width. Atty. Correnti noted that there are no plans in the new plan for bus parking on Essex Street and explained the plan for Essex Street. He noted that Essex Street maintains two eleven foot wide travel lanes all the way from Hawthorne all the way around. He noted that there is parking on Essex Street. He noted that the City Council would have to approve the proposal. He noted that a couple of spaces would be eliminated. Walter Power suggested that there might be three spaces needed for traffic density cueing. Atty. Correnti stated that VHB would prepare a package that will have all of the information that will be needed to show how that will work. Bill Luster stated that traditionally the Planning Board makes recommendations to the City Council on matters of traffic and they either accept them and approve it or they don't. He noted that in this situation it is critical that Essex Street become a two way and that there be a right hand turn lane, and there is nothing to ensure that the critical part of this plan will pass the council. Atty. Correnti noted that the Museum came in with their original plan and proposed no changes. During discussions a lot of good ideas were brought up and they were asked to have their engineers look at the three options. He noted that the Planning Board agrees that the two way plan works and they agree with that and like the plan. He stated that they can do this plan whether it is a one way or a two way and they will support the two way plan because they think this is best plan. He also stated that they will provide the engineering data for this plan and they will go to the City Council when it is before them and ask that it be made a two way. He noted that they realize that they are not the ultimate decision maker on this and neither is the Planning Board, but he felt that if the Board has an extremely strong recommendation and the Museum supports it we can work on that. Lee Harrington stated that he has heard from a couple of merchants in that area that have not heard anything about this plan, noting that one owner was concerned about deliveries to his business and the traffic. Atty. Correnti stated that when that process takes place the neighbors will be notified. Bill Luster, noted that when they are notified that will lead to a spirited discussion on whether or not Essex Street should be a two way noting that it would lead to the issue of whether it works if it is not two way. He noted that it would not work as effectively if it were a one way. Atty. Correnti noted that it is not really expensive to make the street two ways. He also explained that the curb on Essex Street has to be reset by two feet to • increase the lanes to 11 feet. He noted that it is all in front of Museum property. Page 6 of 18 • Chuck Puleo asked how that would affect a potential new owner if Mr. Kiernan wanted to sell the building. Atty. Correnti explained that a new owner would have access as long as the building is there and the museum maintains it. Walter Power expressed concern that the Board is approving a plan that has a business next to it that has adequate access. Denise Sullivan noted that the access was taken away by the City Council. Walter Power noted that he is concerned about that and that the individual should have a Right of Way. Atty. Correnti stated that is would be and they would accept a condition on that. Walter Power noted that if the next owner cannot use the Right of Way that would be taking value away from the property. Atty. Correnti agreed and stated that the access will be there, and noted that how it is written into the decision is important,noting that he does not think that they are in disagreement. Walter Power asked that they discuss the intersection and the color of the brick. He noted the things that have been discussed. Bill Luster noted that they have talked about specific design issues in the last couple of meetings. He noted that there was discussion about the color of the bricks and the lighting compared to what the city has on the Essex Street mall. Atty. Correnti explained that the SRA and DRB approved a slightly different shade of brick that is complimentary to the city brick and that was recommended after the DRB reviewed samples. He also explained that they would use all of the city standard lights on Essex Street and Liberty Street and noted the locations on the plan. He explained that there would be a different set of lights in Armory Square and the Public Garden. He explained that the city standard lights are street lights and the DRB felt comfortable that the proposed lights for the Public Garden and Armory Square are complimentary. Bill Luster asked about the idea that was raised about setting off a smaller area between the handicapped ramps with a different brick pattern to indicate the location of the crosswalk. Atty. Correnti stated that the DRB agreed with the Planning Board that it should be somehow set off. He noted that they will be working on that and going back with that information to the DRB. Chuck Puleo asked if they would be continuing the same brick pattern all the way down Essex Street and up Charter Street. Atty. Correnti stated that they would be using the same brick all the way up and around the complex. He explained the area and the intent of the pattern so that people will follow the walk to other areas such as the Derby Street business and the Witch memorial. Page 5 of 18 Atty. Correnti addressed the Board and stated that the message is clear and the Museum will work on it. He also noted that it would be a revolving matter and the Board can look at what they do and make comment. He suggested that they come back in November and update the Board. Continuation of Public Hearing— Site Plan Review- Peabody Essex Museum Arty. Correnti addressed the Board and noted that at the last meeting they reviewed the DRB recommendations and some of the changes that they suggested. He updated the Board on the permitting, noting that last evening the Salem Redevelopment Authority accepted the recommendations of the Design Review Board and voted to approve the Museums plans as submitted and amended. Atty. Correnti note the Planning Board has seen all of the revisions to the plans that were approved by the SRA. He explained that the primary change that they talked about was the alignment of the archway in the public garden and explained the pattern of the handicapped ramps and walkways. He explained that at the last meeting they reviewed all of the amendments and at this time they would answer questions or review parts of the plan if the Board would like. He stated that they are hopeful of a decision this evening. Walter Power asked to have the access to the Kiernan property reviewed. Atty. Correnti noted that this was part of the original plan and has not changed. He noted that it has been reviewed by the Fire Department. Laura Celano explained the plan for the Kiernan property. She noted that there.is a curb cut for access and an existing wall will remain. She noted that the access is about 20 feet wide and the existing driveway will remain the same. She also noted that the architect did turning templates to ensure that the turnaround is accessible. She explained that they did studies on turning access and that included backing out. Walter Power noted that he looked at it and it looks tight. Ms. Celano explained that they looked at the space and make of his car etc. and they looked at this carefully. Atty. Correnti stated that they are comfortable that this plan meets or exceeds any driveway specification in any ordinance. He also noted that they showed drawings with a Semi tractor trailer truck so that deliveries could be made. Walter Power noted that he was concerned about backing out of the site. Walter Power asked if the land was going to be sold to Mr. Kiernan. Atty. Correnti stated that there are no plans to sell that land now or in the future,but an easement would be granted. Walter Power asked if there would be access in perpetuity. Arty. Correnti stated that as long as there is a building there and a driveway that access would be granted. Page 4 of 18 Mr. Grimes noted that they would be placing 2 high-resolution flat TV screens that would be used to show presentations with Power Point etc. He noted that this technology is consistent with what they use in the Museum. Mr. Grimes explained the layout of the building regarding office space etc. He stated that they would like to implement this and work with the Board to see if this is effective. Lee Harrington asked if they would be running on a regular basis or sporadically. Mr. Grimes stated that they would run them continually. Gene Collins asked about the other windows in the building. Mr. Grimes stated that they could increase the amount of windows that are used if that is something the Board would want. Gene Collins noted that he thought that the use of the windows would be to premier some of the Museum exhibits. Mr. Grimes stated that they could do that, however they cannot display artifacts in the windows because of sunlight since they would fade. Walter Power noted that this was a project that the Board approved in 1996 and there was continual discussion from the Board members and the public that there • would be a feeling or a store front down there. He stated that he walked there tonight prior to the meeting and every window shade was pulled down and the area was dark and is really not an extension of Essex Street. He recalled that L.H. Rogers had those windows lit after dark and there merchandise displays. He noted that at the time the Board made it clear to the Museum that they have appropriate displays. He noted that it is a great place for the Museum to get publicity and for people walking on Essex Street it completes that commercial fapade and not make that end of the street dead, and it is completely dead. He stated that he feels that the Museum has not lived up to the letter of that and it is a blind office front,noting that there are two pedestals in the windows with one artifact on it in the entrance area. He stated that he did not feel that was keeping with the agreement and now it may cost some money to change that. He also stated that he feels that the city has lost a great opportunity there to have that end of Essex Street continued to invite people there after dark to walk. He asked that the Planning Board to readdress this. Gene Collins asked if they had plans for this when the approval was granted in 1996. Walter Power stated that they didn't have any formal plans but we had talked about it and they were agreeable at the time. Mr. Grimes stated that they agree that they did not go far enough down the road in relation to those discussions and they have started to address it with the pedestals and they can and will do more. He also stated that they would need to work with it and consult . with the Board to see what works. Page 2 of 18 Gene Collins asked if there was a possibility that they could have a quick turnaround on this. Denise Sullivan suggested that Board should give the museum some idea of what they need. She noted that Mr. Power is concerned that the windows are not lit at night. Mr. Power agreed noting he felt that is important. Mr. Grimes stated that they would work with their design staff to work this out and see how to maximize the depth of the space in consideration of the office space. He also noted that they would be working to get some programming on there that would interest people. Mr. Power stated that the Board is looking for a plan that we can agree upon and some assurance that the museum will go forward with it. John Moustakis noted that there was a discussion on outside lighting for the whole building. Mr. Grimes stated that they would like to go ahead and implement this and work with the architect on the issues. Bill Cullen noted that when this issue came up at the last meeting he spoke in favor of the museum because he had seen things in the windows. The next time he went by the shades were closed. He noted that he doesn't see what the problem is they can put exhibits up tomorrow. Mr. Grimes stated that there is a problem with the office staff shutting the shades because of sunlight. He noted that they would go back to the staff and tell them that this is an important issue to the Planning Board. Denise Sullivan suggested that they move the blinds back so that the shades could be closed and the window displays and lighting would be visible on the street. Mr. Grimes stated that they could certainly look into that. Lee Harrington stated that they should tell the people who are working there that this is important to the Board. Bill Cullen suggested that they could put dividers up and that could take care of this. He noted that this issue is coming up every couple of weeks. Mr. Grimes noted that the plans that were developed were the plans that were approved by the Board and no changes were made to those plans. He agreed that discussions were held on the use of the windows in ways that would accomplish what the Board wanted. Mr. Power stated that while the Board did not spell out the intent in the decision, he felt that the verbal discussions were acknowledgeable. Bill Luster asked to see the original decision since he was not on the Board at that time. Mr. Grimes stated that they would implement this in the fastest way that they can and will look at a plan. • Page 3 of 18 • Salem Planning Board Minutes of Meeting Thursday, October 19,2000 A regular meeting of the Salem Planning Board was held on Thursday, October 19, 2000 in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green at 7:30 p.m. Those present were: Chairman Walter Power, John Moustakis,Bill Cullen, Chuck Puleo, Gene Collins, Bill Luster, Lee Harrington. Also present was Assistant City Planner Denise Sullivan, Senior Planner Don Cefalo. In the absence of Planning Board Clerk Eileen Sacco this meeting was taped and transcribed by Eileen Sacco. Continuation of Public Hearing-Site Plan Review- Highland Realty 392 Highland Avenue Chairman Walter Power read a letter into the record from the applicant requesting that the public hearing be continued to November 16, 2000 so that they may evaluate some possible changes to the footprint and layout of the facility. Motion made by Bill Luster to continue the public hearing to November 16, 2000, seconded by Chuck Puleo and approved unanimously. • Walter Power requested that the Board takes the agenda out of order and goes to item#3 on the agenda, the Peabody Essex Museum discussion relative to the L. H. Rogers Building Discussion with Peabody Essex Museum Officials regarding the L. H.Rogers Build John Grimes from the Peabody Essex Museum addressed the Board and noted that at the previous meeting there was some concern expressed by the Board about the use of the showcase windows at the L. H. Rogers building and the conditions of the prior approval. He stated that they have looked the approval and see that there was some concern about the building going from a retail use to office space and there was a desire on the part of the Board to maintain some liveliness at the street level and to create some visual interest in those windows. He noted that they had talked at that time about using some case work and video screens and media in those windows to achieve that effect. He noted that they have taken some steps towards that by placing museum pieces on pedestals in the windows and there is certainly more that they can do to fulfill that condition. He explained a drawing that shows some changes to the original discussion including more objects in the windows. • Page 1 of 18 . Michael Kim addressed the Board and reviewed the plans for the drill-shed wall. He noted that they never intended for it to be an exterior wall and looked at ways to preserve it. He explained that they plan to reinforce the wall and add a new brick face. He noted that antique brick would be used. Lee Harrington asked if they had a consultant look at the traffic noting that he was concerned that drivers should know the configuration. Atty. Correnti noted that they would have an evolving traffic plan that they will work out with Captain Callahan. Atty. Correnti addressed the Board and noted that they are done with their formal presentation and they would address questions and issues raised this evening at the next meeting. He noted that they are meeting with the SRA on October 18"' and the next Planning Board meeting is on October 19t°. He also stated that they hope to get the decision of the DRB for the SRA meeting on the 18d. Bill Luster addressed the developer and suggested that he would like to see an casement in place that would insure that a building would never be built on the open access. Atty. Correnti stated that pedestrian access would remain open at all times. He also noted that if they were to make a change to that they would have to go back to the City Council for approval. There being no further questions or comments this evening a motion was made by Bill Cullen to continue the public hearing to October 19, 2000, seconded by John Moustakis and approved unanimously. There being no further business to come before the Planning Board at this meeting a motion was made by Bill Cullen to adjourn the meeting, seconded by John Moustakis and approved unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 11:00 p.m Respectfully submitted by: Eileen M. Sacco, Clerk Salem Planning Board PB100500 . Page 6 f • Walter Power suggested that the Board invite members of the DRB to attend the next Planning Board meeting to discuss these kinds of issues. A lengthy discussion followed on the collaboration of both boards. Denise Sullivan noted that the Planning Department staffs both boards and the views of the Planning Board can be relayed to the DRB. Atty. Correnti stated that the DRB process has been good, noting that Denise Sullivan and Patrick Reffert have moved the process along. He noted that there. are issues that have to be solved, but this is an ongoing process. Lee Harrington suggested that the museum might be setting itself apart from the rest of the city when they should be trying to blend in. John Moustakis noted that the construction for JPI and the Museum could all be going on at the same time and he is concerned about traffic. Arty. Correnti noted that they would confer with the Police Department on the traffic and hire the necessary police details to handle traffic. Walter Power opened the meeting up for public comment at this time. Ward Two Councillor Regina Flynn addressed the Board and requested that the Museum take the plans to the Salem Common Neighborhood Association and make a presentation to them. She also questioned whether the Armory Park would connect to the rest of the gardens behind the Essex Institute. Mrs. Flynn also suggested that money be set aside for signage mitigation on the pedestrian mall. Staley McDermott of 175 Essex Street addressed the Board and questioned if there was any screening for the transformers and the utilities. He stressed that this should be provided for the neighbors on this project as well as the upcoming redevelopment of the old Salem Police Station. He also suggested that all of the lights on the Essex Street pedestrian mall should be uniform He also expressed concern about the drill-shed wall. Ms. Celano stated that the lighting in the public area would be the same as the City of Salem motif, however the public garden and Armory Square will have museum lights. Walter Power questioned why the standard lights that the city uses are not planned for the public garden. Arty. Correnti stated that the city standard is a street light and the public garden is not a street or a walkway, and they wanted to use something soft and decorative. He noted that the city light is attractive but they were looking for something different. David Weiner noted that when he worked on City Hall Plaza in Boston they used City Hall brick. He suggested that a distinct area is nice and it is not wrong to do • that. He stated that he would support city hall brick for the project. Page 5 • Mr. Wright explained the process of converting New Liberty Street and the impact that it will have on the Marine Arts Gallery. He explained that the Marine Arts Gallery will be provided with new gas and sewer connections and explained the access they will have. He noted that they are trying to keep the impact on the Marine Arts Gallery to a minimum. Walter Power asked if they had a plan for the washing of vehicles. Mr. Wright explained that they will have a certain location for the maintenance of vehicles. Walter Power explained that the contractor will be required to sweep the streets once a day or once a week depending on the need. He also noted that catch basins should be check occasionally to ensure that they are not full of debris. Lee Harrington noted that there is a sidewalk down there that was painted by some Salem Public School children and asked if they plan to preserve that. Mr. Wright stated that they are trying to salvage that and if they can they will give it to the city. Mr. Wright stated that he has met with Captain Callahan of the Salem Police Department to review the traffic patterns during construction. He also noted that they have received approval from the Board of Health and they are required to submit a Dust Control Plan to them prior to the start of construction. • Laura Celano addressed the Board and updated them on the process with the DRB. She explained that the west end of Essex Street mall brick will meet the existing brick. She also explained the plans for handicapped ramps and the granite curbing. Ms. Celano reviewed the plans for Armory Square. She reviewed the plan that was submitted to the DRB,which showed the diagonal paths and the layout of the park. She also noted that the Revere Bell has been moved to the front and center of the park Ms. Celano discussed the use of brick that is compatible as opposed to matching the existing brick. Bill Luster expressed concern about the difference in the brick and suggested that they have a brick delineation to show the area to cross Armory Square to the Essex Street Mall. Chuck Puleo noted that granite cobblestones are hard to drive on and actually slow travel down. Ms. Celano noted that the DRB has issues with the granite cobbles and handicap accessibility and has suggested a granite band. • Page 4 • David Weiner stated that the facade of the building will be greatly affected and he would like to see what it will look like. Carter Vinson suggested that the developer make a mock up for the Board to see and the Board can address issues by way of comment. Mr. Woodman suggested that they could do a computer-generated model of the building to show the Board. Walter Power read a letter from Ward 2 City Councillor Regina Flynn, and a letter from neighbors of the project. There being no further questions or comments a motion was made by Bill Cullen to approve the final elevations for the Jefferson at Salem, seconded by Lee Harrington and approved 5-4 with Gene Collins, Bill Luster, Carter Vinson and David Weiner opposed. Continuation of Public Hearing—Peabody Essex Museum Carter Vinson recused himself from discussion of this matter. Walter Power read letters of support for the Museum plans from Councillor at • Large Tom Furey, The Salem Partnership, and Council President Kevin Harvey. Arty. Joe Correnti addressed the Board and noted that they have very little left of their presentation and they would continue where they left off at the last meeting. John Moustakis noted that the Empire building is under demolition and stated that it is the height of the tourist season in Salem. Atty. Correnti reported that less than a third of the rear of the building has been demolished and the museum has agreed to stop demolition for the last two weeks of October and complete it after November 1, 2000. He also reported that the work on the house lots on Charter Street will begin next week. He noted that the work will include foundation preparations and the installation of a construction fence. Bill Wright,the project manager for Turner Construction addressed the Board and are explained the plans for the routes that the construction vehicles will take for deliveries of materials etc. He noted that materials would not be stored for longer than a week on the site, and showed a plan that indicated where vehicles would be stored on the site. Mr. Wright also noted that they are working with the city to plan to construct the roadway in phases. He also stated that they plan to get started with the construction after the first of the year and expect to be completed by 2003. • Page 3 • Carter Vinson stated that these are very big buildings that we will have for a long time and the Board needs to be comfortable with the final design. He suggested that we need a process that will allow that. Bill Cullen agreed with Mr. Moustakis and stated that at some point the Planning Board needs to give this to the City Planner. Mr. Englert addressed the Board and stated that they are making a forty million dollar investment on this project. He noted that they want the buildings to be attractive so that people will want to move into them. Walter Power noted that the location is such that people will see it when they enter the city and he wants to be sure that it is aesthetically pleasing. Gene Collins noted that JPI has been up front and agreed that the city planner can come back to the board. He also noted that it is not unusual to do a prototype for large projects. Denise Sullivan clarified that the City Planner should report to the Board and not have the applicant come back for final approval. David Weiner stated that he would like to see the material himself. • Bill Cullen suggested that the Board give them approval tonight so they can move on with the project. Carter Vinson stated that he has a concern over the whether the choice of material would do anything to the appearance of the mass of the building. Mr. Woodward stated that the issue of size was an issue from the beginning so the color choice is important. Walter Power asked how much trouble it would be for the developer to build a panel. Mr. Englert said that it would be no trouble since they would do that anyway. John Moustakis again expressed his concern that the Board should not hold this up any longer and leave it up to the City Planner. Bill Cullen recalled that a few weeks ago the Planning Board asked the developer to pay for a consultant. The Board has heard the report from the Architect and the expert has given his opinion, and now it seems that the Board is disputing his opinion. He suggested that the Board should rely on the City Planner to use his professional expertise on this matter. Carter Vinson noted that this is the largest development that he has seen since he • has been on the Board. Page 2 • Salem Planning Board Minutes of Meeting Thursday, October 5, 2000 A regular meeting of the Salem Planning Board was held on Thursday, October 5, 2000 in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green at 7:30 p.m Those present were: Chairman Walter Power, John Moustakis, Bill Cullen, David Weiner, Chuck Puleo, Gene Collins, Bill Luster, Lee Harrington and Carter Vinson. Also present were, Assistant City Planner Denise Sullivan, Senior Planner Don Cefalo, and Eileen Sacco, Clerk. Discussion of Final Elevations for Jefferson at Salem—JPI Atty. Joseph Correnti addressed the Board and noted that at the last meeting the Board requested samples of the hardy plank that is proposed for the facade of the building. g Walter Power addressed the meeting and stated that at the last meeting he was bothered by the Architect that was hired as a consultant for the city making the presentation. He noted that he found that the architect was in the middle defending the use of materials etc. and requested that JPI make the presentation • this evening. Jack Englert of JPI addressed the Board and explained that cemplank resists rotting and will not mildew or mold. He noted that it is durable and has a warranty for 50 years. He also explained that the material comes preprimed,but they will prime it and paint it on site. Bill Luster questioned whether they were choosing the cemplank because it is less expensive. Mr. Englert stated that the use of cedar plank is a maintenance issue, noting that over time it will fade with the weather, and the cemplank is maintenance free. He also noted that it is not a cheaper product, however in terms of maintenance there is a cost saving benefit. Mr. Englert also noted that he would rather have all granite but that would be cost prohibitive and he wants to provide the best product for the city. Bill Luster noted that the cemplank looks like cedar and asked if there was an opportunity to take a look at a test wall of buildings to see the material. John Moustakis noted that the final approval on elevations has always been that of the City Planner, with the exception of this cases. He suggested that the Board should have the City Planner address the concerns and report back to the Board, noting that JPI is into the construction drawings at this stage. • Page 1 i There being no further business to come before the Planning Board at this meeting a motion was made by Bill Cullen to adjourn the meeting, seconded by John Moustakis and approved unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 11:15 p.m. Respectfully submitted by: Eileen M. Sacco, Clerk Salem Planning Board PB092100 Page 6 • Patricia Liberti of 3 Lions Lane addressed the Board and expressed her concern about the facade of the building. Kate Wilson of 9 Lions Lane addressed the Board and expressed her concern about surface drainage and snow storage on the site. Anita Thomas of 23 Carriage Hill Lane addressed the Board and expressed her concerns about the additional curb cuts for access to the site. Bill Luster addressed the Board and stated that he is concerned that there is only 19 parking spaces on the plan and there is an existing business on the site. He suggested that the Board ask the City Solicitor if they need to provide additional parking. He also noted that he would like the Planning Department to investigate the matter of 60 feet being in the RI district and the large portion of storm water that needs to be addressed. Mary Beth Nolet of 40 Lions Lane addressed the Board and expressed her opinion of the project and the lack of the concern for the neighborhood that Mr. Amanti has shown in this process. Ward Three Councillor Joan Lovely addressed the Board and expressed her concern that she is offended by the way the developer has addressed this project with the neighbors. She noted that this project is in an entrance corridor and the developer should be reaching out to the neighbors and the community. She asked that the Planning Board deny the project. Frank Felmo of Indian Hill Road addressed the Board and expressed his concern about the additional traffic that would be generated in the neighborhood. Councillor At Large Laura DeToma addressed the Board and expressed he concern as well about how the developer has treated the neighborhood. She noted that this is a big project for a small space and urged the Planning Board to deny the project. There being no further comments or questions regarding this matter a motion was made by John Moustakis to continue the public hearing to October 19, 2000, seconded by Lee Harrington and approved unanimously. Page 5 • Staley McDermott addressed the Board and expressed his concerns about the changes to Armory Park and the use of the facade of the drill shed. Councillor At Large Arthur Sargent addressed the Board and suggested that the Board consider closing the part of Liberty Street and make Essex Street two way and see how that works. Councillor Regina Flynn addressed the Board and noted that her concern is the impact of the project on the neighbors. There being no fiuther questions or comments this evening a motion was made by John Moustakis to continue the public hearing to October 5, 2000, seconded by Bill Cullen and approved unanimously. Continuation of Public Hearing—Site Plan Review Special Permit—Highland Realty Trust—Proposed Storage Facility Arty. Kevin Dolan addressed the Board and explained the history of the project. He noted that at the last meeting. He explained the changes that they have made to the plans. He noted that the dumpster,which is for the existing business on the site has been removed from this plan. • Walter Power asked if there would be any more trees cut on the property. .Bob Griffin explained that the cutting was within the footprint and noted the locations. Bill Luster stated that he would like a representative from the City Engineers Office talk about drainage on that site at the next meeting. Mr. Griffin noted that the City Engineer has had the drainage calculations for a couple of months now. Gary Sinden the Architect for the project addressed the Board and showed a photograph of the area and a computer generated model of the proposed building. Walter Power opened the hearing up for public comment at this time. Anthony Liberti of 3 Lions Lane addressed the Board and stated that he is concerned about the location of the air conditioning units. Mr. Griffin stated that the air conditioning units would be towards the back of the building near ground level. Scott Weissburg addressed the Board and asked the Board to consider what the purposed of the Planning Board is and urged them to deny this project. David Bourque of 20 Indian Hill Road addressed the Board and expressed his concerns about the zoning requirements and asked that the Board consider the • concerns of the Trustees of the Condo Association. Page 4 • Lee Harrington asked if the Veterans Council has been made aware of the changes. Ms. Celano stated that John Grimes of the Peabody Essex Museum has held several meetings with the Veterans Commission. Joan Peyrebrube of VHB explained the plans that they have suggested to alleviate the traffic at Hawthorn Boulevard and Essex Streets. Walter Power asked if they have considered the possibility of putting a road in to replace Liberty Street. Bill Cullen noted that the Council eliminated Liberty Street and he felt that by creating a road in that location would be increasing the danger. He also noted that the elderly tenants at Charter Street might be inclined to use the park,but noted that the road in that location may deter them from using it. Bill Luster stated that he felt that that designing a road for that location could be a nightmare. Walter Power opened the hearing up for public comment at this time. City Planner Patrick Reffert addressed the Board and explained that the Planning Department has been looking at how to make this work for a number of weeks. • He explained the options that they have looked at. He noted that they are concerned about diminishing the connection from the downtown to Essex Street and the waterfront. Ward Two Councillor Regina Flynn addressed the Board and expressed her concern at to why there should be a road created in that location. She asked the Board not to make a decision on that issue this evening so that we can sit down with the City Planner-and the Police Department to see if a solution can be found. Maureen Brodeur, Assistant Executive Director of the Salem Housing Authority addressed the Board and noted that the Salem Housing Authority Board of Directors is against the roadway as it stands now, noting that the present proposed location is too close to the Housing Authority parking lot entrances. Ann Laff of Winter Street addressed the Board and stated that she agrees with Councillor Flynn. Councillor At Large Tom Furey addressed the Board and expressed his opposition to the proposed roadway. Jim Carney of Cambridge Street addressed the Board and expressed his concerns about the landscaping, noting that he would like to see the project have a • combination of deciduous and evergreen trees. Page 3 • Form A— 111- 119— 125 Canal Street—Crosby's Supermarket Arty. Atkins explained the Form A for the property at 111-119-125 Canal Street. There being no comments or questions from the Board a motion was made by Gene Collins to approve the Form A for 11-119-125 Canal Street, seconded by Lee Harrington and approved unanimously. Discussion on Final Elevations for the Jefferson At Salem Jonathan Woodward the Architect hired on behalf of the City to do a peer review of the plans for the Jefferson at Salem addressed the Board and noted that had completed his review. He reviewed the drawings and explained the process that they used to research the architectural styles of the surrounding neighborhoods. Mr. Woodward noted that they are planning to use hardy plank for the facade of the buildings. David Weiner asked if there were any locations that hardy plank has been used that the Board could visit. He noted that this parcel is in the entrance to the downtown and he would like to be sure that it looks right. Denise Sullivan explained that the details of the buildings were what Mr. Woodward was to look at and he has done that. She also noted that he has made suggestions to JPI and they have agreed to them • Bill Luster suggested that he would like to see a sample of the hardy plank John Moustakis agreed noting that he wants to make sure that this is attractive for the city. Mr. Woodward stated that samples of the hardy plank will available at the next meeting for the review of the Board. Continuation of Public Hearing—Peabody Essex Museum—Site Plan Review Special Permit—Liberty and Essex Streets Atty. Joseph Correnti addressed the Board and stated that there are three things that they would like to review with the Board this evening. He introduced Laura Celano to review the plans for Armory Square. Ms. Celano addressed the Board and presented the plans for Armory Square. She noted that the comments of the DRB have been taken into consideration and some changes have been made to the plans. Walter Power noted that the bell is an important artifact and the location of it should be in an area where it can be seen. He suggested that it be in the center of Armory Park. Ms. Celano stated that they looked at that but felt that it would disrupt the flow of pedestrian traffic. • Page 2 • Salem Planning Board Minutes of Meeting Thursday, September 21, 2000 A regular meeting of the Salem Planning Board was held on Thursday, September 21, 2000 in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green at 7:30 p.m. Those present were: Chairman Walter Power, John Moustakis, Bill Cullen, David Weiner, Chuck Puleo, Gene Collins,Bill Luster and Lee Harrington. Also present were, Assistant City Planner Denise Sullivan, Senior Planner Don Cefalo, and Eileen Sacco, Clerk. Continuation of Public Hearing Crosby's Supermarket—Canal Street Renovations Atty. George Atkins addressed the Board and reviewed the revisions that have been made to the plan since the last meeting. Atty. Atkins noted that they have revised the area behind the liquor store,which is an improvement and they have moved the dumpster. Walter Power asked if there were any changes to the electrical systema Ed Berman addressed the Board and stated that they would be upgrading from 1200 amps to 1600. • Mr. Berman also reviewed the material for the facade of the building. He noted that the plans show concrete but they have decided to use dry wall and clap boards which will be more attractive. Walter Power asked about the roof top air conditioning units that are proposed. Atty. Atkins explained that they will be replacing the unit for the liquor store and the air conditioning for the new part of Crosby's will be buffered to the rear of the building. Walter Power noted that he would like a condition in the approval that the Planning Board take another look at the air conditioning when construction is complete if any concerns should arise. Motion made by John Moustakis to close the public hearing, seconded by Lee Harrington and approved unanimously. Denise Sullivan reviewed the draft decision with the Board. Motion made by Gene Collins to approve the Site Plan Review Special Permit for Crosby's Supermarket for renovations on Canal Street, seconded by Lee Harrington and approved unanimously. Page 1 • • Walter Power opened the hearing up to public comment at this time. There was no one present who wished to speak on the application. It was suggested that the applicant notify the abutters that the work is occurring on the property. There being no further questions or comments regarding this matter, a motion was made by John Moustakis to approve the Waiver from Frontage for 21 Verona Street, seconded by Gene Collins and approved unanimously. Public Hearing—Wireless Communications Facility Special Permit—NEXTEL— 1000 Loring Avenue Chris Nassaria of NEXTEL presented the plans for the installation antennas at 1000 Loring Avenue. He explained that they are requesting to install 12 panel antennas on the structure and place an equipment room, cable and cable tray inside the building. He noted that the panel antennas would not be greater than fifteen feet about the height of the building and will be painted to match the colors of the building. Mr. Nassaria noted that the traffic generated by the facility will be limited to two trip per month which will have no effect on the neighborhood. Walter Power opened the hearing up to public comment at this time. There was no one present who wished to speak on the application. There being no further questions or comments regarding this matter, a motion was made by Lee Harrington to approve the Wireless Communications Facility Special Permit for NEXTEL, at 1000 Loring Avenue, seconded by Chuck Puleo and approved unanimously. There being no further business to come before the Planning Board at this meeting, a motion was made by John Moustakis, to adjourn the meeting, seconded by Lee Harrington and approved unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 11:05 p.m. Respectfully submitted by: Eileen M. Sacco, Clerk Salem Planning Board PB090700 • Atty. Atkinsnoted that the proposed project will improve the appearance of the entire structure and site improvements are planned as well. Gene Collins asked if the bank would clash with the other buildings. Atty. Atkins stated that the bank would fit in with the site. John Moustakis expressed concern about the loading area for the liquor store. He questioned how the trucks would load and unload in the area established. He also noted that he had concerns about trucks backing out of the loading area. Atty. Atkins stated that they would take a look at that and present something at the next meeting. Walter Power opened the hearing up for public comment at this time. Ward Five Councillor Kim Driscoll addressed the Board and stated that she is in favor of the plan. She noted that this will be a big amenity to the area, further noting that Canal Street is booming with business. Councillor At Large Laura DeToma addressed the Board and commended the applicant for his cooperation with the neighbors and for working with the city. She noted that the Crosby's are committed to the city. Ward Four Councillor Leonard O'Leary addressed the Board and noted that Mr. Crosby does a lot of the city and runs a fine establishment. • There being no further questions or comments regarding this matter this evening a motion as made by Lee Harrington to continue the public hearing to September 21, 2000, seconded by John Moustakis and approved unanimously. Public Hearing—Waiver from Frontage Requirements—21 Verona Street Sabrina Harmon from DiMento and DiMento addressed the Board and presented the plan. She explained that the applicant owns 21 on Verona Street(lot 2)and 9 Cloverdale Ave. (lot 1). She explained that the Northeast side of lot 1 and the southeast side of lot 2 abut one another and the applicant is requesting to subdivide the existing lots into lots I &2. She noted that these lots do not meet the frontage requirements and due to the changes made to the lots,the applicant is required to receive a Waiver from Frontage. Atty. Harmon stated that the applicant applied for and received variances from the ZBA for lot area, lot area per dwelling, lot width, front and rear setbacks, and height. Walter Power read comments from other city Boards and Commissions. Comments from the City Engineer were noted and Atty. Harmon noted that the plans presented this evening reflect the concerns of the City Engineer. • • Councillor At Large Laura DeToma addressed the Board and stated that she has serious concerns about this project and the effect that it will have on the quality of life in the neighborhood. She noted that she echoed the concerns of her fellow Councillors and feels that the developer has not been responsive to the concerns of the neighbors. She stated that she feels that the Planning Board should not approve any project where the developer does not cooperate with the neighbors. Janet Mazer of 9 Countryside Lane addressed the Board and expressed her concerns about the trucks that are on the site from the existing business in the other building. Bill Mancinelli of 9 Longfellow Drive addressed the Board and expressed his concern about the date that the traffic study was done. David Bourque of 20 Indian Hill Lane addressed the Board and noted that the choices for landscaping should be considered by the neighbors. Joyce Nelson addressed the Board and stated that she is not opposed to anyone opening a business but that type of business does not belong in that area. There being no further comments or questions regarding this matter this evening, a motion was made by Lee Harrington to continue the public hearing to September 21, 2000, seconded by Gene Collins and approved unanimously. • The Planning Board scheduled a site visit of Thursday, September 14, 2000 at 6:00 p.m. Public Hearing— Site Plan Review—Crosby Realty Trust— 111 and 119-125 Canal Street- Crosby's Market Atty. George Atkins addressed the Planning Board and explained the plans for the proposed renovations for Crosby's Market on Canal Street. Atty. Atkins explained that the proposed project includes the construction and expansion to the existing Crosby's Market building which is approximately 18, 334 s.f. The plan shows a proposed retail expansion of a 9,088 s.f building with an additional 2,860 feet for second floor office space. The proposed expansion will house a new bank, the relocation of an existing liquor store and provide office space for Crosby's Market. The new bank will have a drive through window that will only be accessible from an entrance off Canal Street. Atty. Atkins noted that they have agreed to put up a fence in the back of the building to limit access as requested by the neighbors. Atty. Atkins noted that they have asked for a variance on the parking noting that they have 152 spaces and there should be 177 spaces. He explained that their plan calls for employees to park behind the building to relieve parking for customers in the parking area. • . Walter Power asked how much distance there was between the two buildings on the lot. Atty. Dolan stated that there is 50-75 feet. Lee Harrington suggested that the Planning Board should have a site visit. Walter Power opened the hearing up for Public Comment at this time. Councillor At Large Tom Furey addressed the Board and stated that he feels that this project would adversely effect the neighborhood and he is opposed to this use for the site. He suggested that a better choice would be a medical office building. Atty. Steve Singer representing the Highland Condominium owners addressed the Board and noted that they met with the developer and the discussion tonight does not show the changes that they suggested that they would make to the building. Scott Weissberg of the Highland Condominiums addressed the Board and reviewed the package of information that was prepared. He also noted that there are four storage facilities in the area. Ward Four Councillor Leonard O'Leary addressed the Board and noted that he contacted Mr. Amanti and asked that he notify him when he had plans for the lot so that he could set up a neighborhood meeting and Mr. Amanti never called him to do that. • Ward Three Councillor Joan Lovely addressed the Board and noted that while the project is not in her ward, constituents of hers in ward three are across the street on Highland Avenue. She stated that she felt that this is a dead use of this land and asked Mr. Amanti to consider a use that would be more alive and something that would add to the neighborhood. Patricia Liberti of 3 Lions Lane addressed the Board and expressed her objections to a storage facility being at this location. Bob Levin of 42 Lions Lane addressed the Board and expressed his concern that if the project is approved he would like to see them be required to install active fire sprinkler alarms. Sandra Warner of 3 Countryside Lane addressed the Board and stated that she is concerned about the alarms in the building. Michelle Rubano of 11 Pyburn Avenue addressed the Board and stated that she is an abutter and is concerned about the effect that the drainage from the project would have on her property. Walter Power noted that the project would have to go to the Conservation Commission and they would address drainage issues. • • scheduled to begin in mid September and there should be no problem for Halloween. Councillor O'Leary also noted that changing traffic patterns should go to the City Council and he suggested that he would like to see the developer go to the City Council for amendments. Atty. Correnti stated that the Museum continues to provide information to anyone who requests it. Walter Power addressed Councillor O'Leary and noted that in the past the Planning Board has made traffic suggestions to the City Council on other projects and they will look at this project as they have others in the past. Councillor At Large Tom Furey addressed the Board and stated that he is against creating another road in the downtown area. There being no further questions or comments regarding this matter this evening, a motion was made by Gene Collins to continue the Public Hearing to September 21, 2000, seconded by Lee Harrington and approved unanimously. Public Hearing—Site Plan Review—Highland Realty Co. LLC—392 Highland Avenue— Proposed Storage Facility Atty. Kevin Dolan of Woburn addressed the Board and presented the plans for a • proposed storage facility at 392 Highland Avenue. He explained that they are seeking Planning Board approval because they are in the Entrance Corridor Overlay District. Atty. Dolan recalled that at the July 6, 2000 Planning Board meeting the plans for this project were presented and the Board asked that they address the concerns of the neighbors. He noted that a meeting was held and they have done some traffic studies of other facilities that are similar to the one proposed. Atty. Dolan reviewed samples of lighting that they are proposing to use. He also noted that the noise from the air conditioning units was a concern. He stated that they are proposing to use 4 residential style air conditioners for the building and should generate less noise. Atty. Dolan noted that they are proposing put in a berm and tree plantings and fencing similar to what is in the neighborhood. Walter Power asked how the access would be gained to the second floor of the building. Atty. Dolan explained the plans and noted the area that would have stairways to the second floor. He noted the locations on the plan. John Moustakis noted that the size and the number of the units was a concern to the neighbors. Atty. Dolan noted that the first application had a typo in it that indicated that the number of units would be 200. John Moustakis noted that the neighbors had asked if • they would consider changing the number of units for the project, noting that 400 is a large amount. L • Denise Sullivan noted that once Essex Street is made a two way street that would alleviate the pressure. Walter Power questioned if the traffic study that was done included Essex Street being made a two way. Gene Collins suggested that they developer draft something that would depict the street proposed so that it could looked at and at least considered the one way street. Gene Collins asked if the external walkways would remain in perpetuity for pedestrian use. Atty. Correnti noted that the pedestrian walkways are addressed in the Memorandum of Understanding with the City of Salem. Walter Power noted that the Board could make that a condition of approval to reinforce the Memorandum of Understanding. Michael Kim of Mosha Safde Associates addressed the Board and explained the facade of the building. He showed pictures and explained how they came to the design that they chose. He noted that in choosing the materials for the buildings, other buildings in the neighborhood were taken into consideration. Atty. Correnti noted that the facade is being reviewed thoroughly by the DRB and the SRA. Walter Power noted that when the Board approved the plans for the Rogers building they • talked extensively about keeping the display windows in tact. He noted that the Museum has not followed through on that at all and he would like to know why they have not followed through with that. Chuck Puleo referred to the plan and noted that he would like to see windows along the side with the brick walls. Walter Power opened the hearing up for Public Comment at this time. Ward Two Councillor Regina Flynn addressed the Board and stated that she applauds the designers and she believes that this project will be a presence in Salem. She noted that she is concerned about the pedestrian walkway, noting that Liberty Street is 21 feet and she believes that the suggested roadway would not take away from the building at all. She noted that the road would benefit the Marine Arts Gallery and the neighbors on Brown Street as well. Ward Three Councillor Joan Lovely addressed the Board and stated that she agreed with Councillor Flynn that the construction of the roadway through the public garden. She strongly urged the Board to consider this and noted that it would relieve traffic. Ward Four Councillor Leonard O'Leary addressed the Board and expressed his concerns about the closing of Liberty Street and the timing of the demolition of the Empire • Building being done in October. Atty. Correnti explained that the demolition is • Salem Planning Board Minutes of Meeting Thursday, September 7, 2000 A regular meeting of the Salem Planning Board was held on Thursday, September 7, 2000 in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green. Those present were: Chairman Walter Power, John Moustakis, David Weiner, Chuck Puleo, Gene Collins, and Lee Harrington. Also present were Senior Planner Don Cefalo, and Eileen Sacco, Clerk. Members Absent: Bill Luster and Carter Vinson Chairman Walter Power called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Discussion Pertaining to Final Elevations for Jefferson At Salem— 190 Bridge Street Denise Sullivan informed the Board that the applicant has requested that this item be postponed until the next meeting of the Planning Board as they are not ready to present tonight. Continuation of Public Hearing—Site Plan Review—Peabody Essex Museum—Liberty Street and Essex Street • Atty. Joseph Correnti addressed the Board and reviewed the concerns of the Board from the previous meeting. He stated that tonight they wanted to review the traffic patterns and take a look at the building this evening as well. Atty. Correnti explained that they looked at two way traffic coming out of the Museum Place Parking Garage which would call for Essex Street being made a two way street with the abandonment of Liberty Street between Essex and Charter Streets. He suggested that this new alignment would provide traffic flow to Charter Street from Hawthorne Boulevard when Liberty Street is closed. John Moustakis asked if there would be any parking on Essex Street. Atty. Correnti noted that there are currently 1 I spaces on Essex Street and 10 spaces would remain. Walter Power addressed Atty. Correnti and noted that at the last meeting it was suggested that a road be constructed through the proposed public garden along Liberty.Street. Atty. Correnti noted they looked at that and that would create more turns with unsignalized intersections. David Wiener suggested that as a one way street it would relieve traffic from Essex Street. • John Moustakis noted that the Charter Street intersection is tough to get through now. Bill Cullen moved and Bill Luster seconded a motion to approve the Site Plan Review for North Shore Medical Center. The motion was approved unanimously. There being no further business to come before the Planning Board at this meeting a motion was made by John Moustakis and seconded by Bill Cullen to adjourn the meeting. The motion was approved unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 10:00 p.m. Respectfully submitted by: Eileen M. Sacco, Clerk Salem Planning Board PB072000 • 6 . Walter Power noted that the city gave up a major street in the downtown and he would like to be assured that the city would have pedestrian access beyond 2007. Denise Sullivan stated that she would look into that before the next meeting. Bill Wright from Turner Construction reviewed the construction traffic plan with the Board. He explained that the first phase would be the demolition of the Empire building and they would access that from the Charter Street parking area. The next phase then would be the pouring of foundations and the relocation of the houses on Charter Street. He also noted that there are 10 parking spaces for the Salem Housing Authority that will be relocated as well. Peter Kiernan of the Marine Arts Gallery addressed the Board and expressed his concern about getting customers into his shop. He stated that he has concerns about the size of the driveway. There being no further questions or comments at this time a motion was made by Bill Luster to continue the public hearing to August 10, 2000 at 7:00 p.m. at One Salem Green. Motion was seconded by Lee Harrington and approved unanimously. . Continuation of Public Hearing— Site Plan Review —North Shore Medical Center— 55-81 Highland Avenue Atty. Joseph Correnti addressed the Board and noted that at the last meeting the Board discussed traffic and its effects on the abutting Collins Middle School. He reported that they have met with the Police Department, Councillor Lovely, and Denise Sullivan on the matter. He reported that the Miss Manning at Collins Middle School suggested additional signage which would not allow vehicles to exit on Powder House Lane entrance during drop of and pick up times at the school. Scott Petrovicz explained that they would be posting signage that will say NO RIGHT TURN between the hours of 7:30— 8:30 a.m. and 2:30— 3:30 p.m. Councillor Lovely addressed the Board and stated that she is satisfied with the solution of signage and thanked the hospital for addressing that matter. There being no further questions or comments regarding this project John Moustakis moved to close the public hearing, seconded by Lee Harrington and approved unanimously. • The Board reviewed the draft decision for the project. 5 • Walter Power questioned which side of the street would they be widening the sidewalk. Atty. Correnti replied that they would be widening the side with the proposed Armory Park. Bill Luster noted that there are a number of parking spaces on the north side of Essex Street and questioned if losing them was wise. Atty. Correnti stated that they would be losing 2 or 3 spaces and the others will be moved to the other side of Essex Street. Walter Power noted that they could be moved to the other side of the street, assuming Essex Street remains a one way. Mr. Houston stated that they would be able to accommodate the parking with two-way traffic as well. Mr. Houston explained the sidewalk improvements and the work that would be done within the public way. He noted that the work along Charter Street would have a slight shifting and realignment of the sidewalk behind the Museum. Mr. Houston reviewed the utility improvements. He explained that the drainage and utilities for most services would uses the existing system. Water and sewer service for the new addition would be fed from the existing building. He also reviewed the storm drainage system. The electric and • telephone services on Liberty Street will be relocated. Walter Power questioned whether the city has determined that the drainage is adequate to handle the additional drainage on the site. Michael Kim addressed the question and stated that the addition would create very little, if any additional drainage to the site. Laura Celano explained the paving and the landscaping space for Armory Square. She reviewed the materials that they intend to use, such as the brick that will be used for the walkways. She also noted that there would be Blue Stone walks in Armory Square. Lee Harrington requested that the Board be shown samples of the materials that they plan to use. Atty. Correnti stated that they would be able to arrange that. Bill Luster stated that the interior walkway is a concern, noting that there needs to be passage from Essex Street to Charter Street. He suggested that the Museum needs to provide the city some assurance either by easement or legal agreement to guarantee that public access will always be there. Atty. Correnti stated that there has been discussion on that and they will • work some language out that will maintain access for pedestrians. 4 . John Moustakis stated that he agreed that Essex Street should be two ways to Hawthorne Boulevard, noting that it is a safety issue. Atty. Correnti stated that the Museum does not have the ability to make Essex Street a two way street that would have to be done by the City Council. He also noted that it is something that they could look at and report back to the Board on. Walter Power suggested that the Police Department and the City Planner should be involved in those discussions. Atty. Correnti stated that they would have VHB take a look at it, and they will do their share in conjunction with the Planning Department. Bill Luster suggested that they look at Brown Street and Essex Streets noting that 150 cars at peak hours is a significant amount for that area. John Moustakis stated that Salem is hoping that the Museum expansion will generate more business to Salem not just necessarily to the Museum and the Board should look at the growth and background. Walter Power agreed noting that we need to keep in mind circulation of traffic in the downtown. He also noted that he assumes that the traffic circulation in the downtown will remain the same with the exception of the closing of Liberty Street. • Atty. Correnti noted that they did not propose any changes in transportation circulation but they would be happy to look at that and other options and work with the Board on this. Tom Houston form CID Associate addressed the Board and explained the roadway changes and circulation changes for New Liberty Street. He explained the area of Liberty Street that will be closed. He noted that the pedestrian area which will have a clearly identifiable path for vehicular traffic. He also noted that they have eliminated some parking spaces and have plans to widen Essex Street on the west side, which is already land owned by the Museum. Mr. Houston explained that the Marine Arts Gallery at 135 Essex Street will have driveway access for Liberty Street and they are providing them with expanded driveway access and turnaround. John Moustakis stated that he was concerned about encroachment on Essex Street if they widen the sidewalk. Mr. Houston stated that they would be using land that is already owned by the Museum. Atty. Correnti stated that they are proposing to do extensive work on public property such as paving etc. • 3 • Bill Cullen stated that he felt that the plan was pretty straightforward. There being no further questions or comments regarding this plan a motion was made by Bill Cullen and seconded by Lee Harrington to approve the Form A for 223-231Derby Street. The motion was approved unanimously. Continuation of Public Hearing—Site Plan Review —Peabody Essex Museum — Liberty and Essex Street Atty. Joseph Correnti addressed the Planning Board and recalled that two weeks ago the public hearing was opened and a presentation on the overview of the project was made. He explained that this evening they intend to present the traffic study, which will address vehicular and pedestrian traffic and an analysis on the impact of closing Liberty Street. He introduced Joan Peyreburne of VHB Engineering to make the presentation. Ms. Peyreburne addressed the Board and explained the process that they used for the traffic study. She stated that they expect annual visitation to increase from 130,000 to 260,000. She explained visitation patterns, hours of operation and evening programs offered after 7:00 p.m. • Ms. Peyreburne stated that they estimated that the travel mode is 75% automobile, 22% bus tours, and 3% use public transportation. She explained that the breakdown on the increase anticipated, is an additional 270 vehicles in October which is their peak month, 40 more on weekdays, and 110 vehicles on the weekend during peak season. With regards to parking Ms. Peyreburne estimated an additional 50 spaces on weekday and 130 spaces on the weekend during peak season in October. She stated that they would encourage the use of the South Harbor Parking Garage. Ms. Peyreburne addressed the impact on the closure of Liberty Street. She stated that they looked at who is affected by the closure of Liberty Street. Walter Power asked if they have given any thought to making Essex Street a two way street, noting that cars will be directed to the Common area which has heavy pedestrian traffic. David Weiner agreed noting that October is the peak season in the city and nothing moves in that area. Atty. Correnti stated that the city has a downtown traffic plan for Halloween, 2 • Salem Planning Board Minutes of Meeting Thursday, July 20, 2000 A regular meeting of the Salem Planning Board was held on Thursday, July 20, 2000 in the cafeteria at the Bentley School, Memorial Drive, Salem, MA. Those present were: Chairman Walter Power, John Moustakis, Bill Cullen, Chuck Puleo, Gene Collins, Lee Harrington, David Weiner, and Bill Luster. Also present were Senior Planner Denise Sullivan and Eileen Sacco, Clerk. Approval of Minutes The minutes of the meeting of April 6, 2000 were presented for approval. Bill Cullen moved and John Moustakis seconded a motion to approve the minutes of the Planning Board meeting held on April 6, 2000. The motion was approved unanimously. The minutes of the meeting of April 24, 2000 were presented for approval. Bill Cullen moved and Lee Harrington seconded a motion to approve the minutes of the Planning Board meeting held on April 24, 2000. The motion • was approved unanimously. The minutes of the meeting of May 4, 2000 were presented for approval. David Weiner moved and Lee Harrington seconded a motion to approve the minutes of the Planning Board meeting held on May 4, 2000. The motion was approved unanimously. The minutes of the meeting of May 18, 2000 were presented for approval. Bill Cullen moved and John Moustakis seconded a motion to approve the minutes of the Planning Board meeting held on May 18, 2000. The motion was approved unanimously. Form A Subdivision — 223-231 Derby Street— Pickering Wharf Hotel Atty. Joseph Correnti addressed the Board on behalf of his client, Rocket Realty Trust and presented a Form A for 223-231 Derby Street. Atty. Correnti stated that the proposed hotel site plan, which was approved by the Planning Board, showed the demolition of the bank building currently located on the lot and its reconstruction on the lot. He noted that the Salem zoning ordinance requires that only one principal building may be located on a lot and explained that this Form A will subdivide the lot so that the bank • building is located on one lot and the hotel is located on another lot. 1 • There being no further business to come before the Planning Board at this meeting, a motion was made by Bill Cullen to adjourn the meeting, seconded by John Moustakis and approved unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 11:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted by: Eileen M. Sacco, Clerk Salem Planning Board PB070600 8 • Don Garrity of Salem Hospital explained that the only ambulances that use the front entrance are the emergencies and the others use the entrance at the back of the property for Davenport 1. Chuck Puleo asked if the plans call for new signage. Mr. Garrity stated that the hospital has an exterior and interior signage plan for the whole campus. Ward Three Councillor Joan Lovely addressed the Board and noted that the use of Powder House lane may have implications on the Collins Middle School which uses the road as an entrance and exit. She requested that they consult with the School Safety Officer Charlie Reed for his input on the plan. Walter Power addressed the applicant and noted that he would like to see them work on a parking plan for the campus. He also noted that Highland Avenue his a heavy traffic area and asked of there was anyway that they could address that. Atty. Correnti noted that this plan is for interior improvements to the campus and no work is proposed on Highland Avenue. Ted Angelakis addressed the Board and expressed his concern about the traffic on Powder House Lane particularly in the morning and the afternoon when students are being dropped off and picked up. He also noted that there is a lot of traffic during sporting events at Bertram Field. Walter Power suggested that perhaps they could have no parking on Powder House Lane. Mr. Garrity explained that there is usually parking on that street for big events such as football games etc. He also noted that the hospital allows the use of the parking area behind Bertram Field for events free of charge. There being no further questions or comments at this meeting a motion was made by Lee Harrington to continue the Public Hearing to July 20, 2000, seconded by Bill Cullen and approved unanimously. Form A Subdivision - Parcel A Parallel Street Denise Sullivan addressed the Board and presented a Form A for Parcel A on Parallel Street that needed the signatures of the Board Members. • • John Moustakis asked how long the lease is for. Mr. Murphy noted that the lease is for five years. There being no further questions or comments regarding this matter, a motion was made by Gene Collins to close the Public Hearing, seconded by Lee Harrington and approved unanimously. Gene Collins moved and Lee Harrington seconded a motion to approve the Wireless Communications Facility Special Permit for 18 Washington Square. The motion was approved unanimously. Public Hearing - Wireless Communications Facility Permit - 117 Lafayette Street - Lincoln Hotel Christopher McCarrior addressed the Board and explained the application of Nextel for the placement of 12 wireless communication antennas on the roof of the Lincoln Hotel at 117 Lafayette Street. He noted that they meet all the criteria of the special permit. Frank Brancato a radio frequency engineer for Nextel addressed the Board and explained that they operate on a different frequency and band with a transmission distance of 1-3 miles. He noted that the antennas have been decreased in size as requested by Mass Historic and can barely be seen over the parapet of the roof. There being no further questions or comments regarding this matter, a motion was made by Lee Harrington to close the Public Hearing, seconded by Gene Collins and approved unanimously. Bill Cullen moved and Lee Harrington seconded a motion to approve the Wireless Communications Facility Special Permit for 117 Lafayette Street. The motion was approved unanimously. Continuation of Public Hearing - Site Plan Review - North Shore Medical Center - 55-81 Highland Avenue Atty. Joseph Correnti addressed the Board and noted that at the last meeting the Board had some concerns about the entry ways, a curb cut on Highland Avenue, and the suggestion that the hospital use Powder House Lane as a means of the exiting the campus. He noted that they have looked at those things and have revised the plans. Bruce Campbell of Campbell Associates addressed the Board and explained • the traffic plans. Scott Petrowicz explained the changes to the plans. 6 • David Rymer of 17 Lions Lane addressed the Board and asked if there were any regulations regarding what could be stored in the facility. Walter Power asked the applicant to provide a list of materials that can be stored there. Atty. Singer noted that the public notice for the meeting said that 200 units were proposed and now they are saying that it is really 400. He suggested that the applicant should refile with the correct information. City Councillor Tom Furey addressed the Board and noted that the area is a nice place to live and that this is a poor use of the land. He urged the Board to vote against the plan. Anita Thomas of the Highland Condominium Board of Trustees addressed the Board and thanked Councillor Furey for supporting the neighbors and noted that their own ward Councillor did not attend the meeting. Joyce Nelson addressed the Board and expressed her concerns about the traffic that would be added to the neighborhood because of this facility. Walter Power noted that it was getting late and the Board has other business to attend to this evening. He noted that the Board would be continuing the • Public Hearing to its next meeting on July 20. He suggested that the developer meet with the neighbors and try to come to some consensus with them about this use. He also asked that Denise Sullivan find out if the applicant should file a new application since there was an error in the number of units. Motion made by Lee Harrington to continue the public hearing to July 20, 2000 seconded by Chuck Puleo and approved unanimously. Public Hearing - Wireless Communications Facility Special Permit - 18 Washington Sqaure - Hawthorne Hotel Tom Murphy addressed the Board and explained the application for Omni Point Communications to install wireless communication antennas on the roof of the Hawthorne Hotel at 19 Washington Square. He noted that the application is in total compliance with the by law. Mr. Murphy explained that they looked at several locations in the area, including the Salem Housing Authority on Charter Street, Immaculate Conception Church and the Hotel. He explained that the location of the building and the site lines for various downtown locations are needed to improve service to their customers. • 5 • Atty. Steve Singer representing the Highland Condominium Board of Trustees addressed the Board and asked what other permits are needed for the project. Mr. Griffin stated that they would be filing with the Conservation Commission for an Order of Conditions, noting that some work will be done in the buffer zone. Steve Weisberg, Chairman of the Highland Condominium Board of Trustees addressed the Board and noted that they are concerned about lighting, zoning issues, stormwater management and snow storage. He also noted that they are concerned about parking and there is a concern as to whether the owner intends to rent space to RV's. He also suggested that the color of the facade should match the condos. Patricia LiBerti of 3 Lions Lane addressed the Board and expressed he concerns about lighting and plans to install a chain link fence with barb wire on the top of it. Kate Wilson of 9 Lions Lane addressed the Board and expressed her concerns about snow storage. Bill Mancinelli of 9 Longfellow Lane addressed the Board and stated that • this is not what he expected when he purchased his unit at the Highland Condominiums. Anthony LiBerti of 3 Lions Lane addressed the Board and expressed his concerns about the noise that would be generated from the air conditioning unit. Mr. Griffin explained that they would have a small roof mounted cooling unit which could be moved if there is a problem with noise. Marybeth Nolet of 40 Lions Lane addressed the Board and expressed her concerns about the project. She suggested that the applicant go back to the drawing board and come back with a more suitable business that would benefit the community. Mark Gilmore asked how many units they are planning. Mr. Griffin stated that there would be 400 units. The audience seemed surprised at that. Bill Cullen noted that the narrative for the application indicated that there would be 210 units. Mr. Griffin stated that it was an error and should have read 200 units on each floor for a total of 400 units. • 4 • Ellen DiGeronimo, Executive Director of the Salem Chamber of Commerce addressed the Board and expressed the support of the Chamber of Commerce for the project. She noted that it would be an anchor for the future of the downtown. Staley McDermot of 175 Essex Street addressed the Board and expressed his disappointment that the Museum has not sought more community input on the design of the buildings. He also noted that it is a good project and it should go forward. There being no further questions or comments regarding this plan this evening a motion was made by Bill Cullen to continue the public hearing to July 20, 2000, seconded by Lee Harrington and approved unanimously. Planning Board member Bill Luster left the meeting at this time (9:30 p.m.) Public Hearing - Site Plan Review - Highland Realty Company LLC - 394 Highland Avenue Mr. Griffin addressed the Board on behalf of his client Mr. Amanti and explained the plans to build a storage facility at 394 Highland Avenue. He • reviewed the site plan and the landscaping plans. He noted that the grading would be toward the rear of the property towards a detention pond and the drainage will be no different than it is today. He also noted that a proposed dry well will recharge the ground water. Mr.Griffin stated that the project complies with zoning regulations for that area and they are not requesting any waivers. Chairman Walter Power opened the public hearing for public comment at this time. Michelle Rubino of 11 Pyburn Avenue addressed the Board and expressed her concern about the location of the proposed detention pond and the possible flooding of her property. Mr. Griffin stated that the purpose of the detention pond was to improve the drainage in the area not to make it worse. Mrs. Rubino asked what the hours of operation would be. Mr. Griffin stated that they are proposing 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. Bob Levin of 42 Lions Lane addressed the Board and expressed his concerns about security and lighting on the site. Mr. Griffin stated that they would be using wall pack lighting with hoods and there should be no effect on the neighborhood. • 3 / Atty. John Serafini Sr. addressed the Board and noted that over the next few weeks they will present traffic studies and information at length to the Board. He stressed that the Museum is cognizant of the plans and feels that this plan will benefit Salem. He also noted that the Administration supports this project and it has been made possible because of the initiative of the City of Salem. City Planner Patrick Raffert addressed the Board and reiterated the Mayor's support for the project. He noted that the Mayor is hopeful that this project will bring to Salem what we need to make it a world class city. City Councillor Tom Furey addressed the Board and expressed his support for the project. Ward Two Councillor Regina Flynn addressed the Board and expressed her support for the project. Ward three Councillor Joan Lovely addressed the Board and read a letter of support from City Council President Kevin Harvey. She also expressed her support for the projectors well. Ward One Councillor Scott LaCava addressed the Board and expressed his support for the project. Tim Jenkins of Historic Salem Inc. addressed the Board and read a statement outlining the concerns that they have. A copy of that statement is attached to these minutes. Mr. Lyman of 129 Essex Street addressed the Board and expressed his concern about the lack of communication from the Museum during the demolition of the Armory wall. Biff Michaud of the Witch Museum addressed the Board and stated that he felt that it is a world class building and will help to foster Salem. He also recommended that they look at moving the wall and the archway in Armory Park to allow for more open space. Mr. Van Valkenburgh stated that they could take a look at that. Lance Kasparian Chairman of the Salem Historic Commission addressed the Board and noted that the Historic Commission has some suggestions and recommendations for the Planning Board. He asked that the Historic Commission be allowed to review the plans and comment on them. 2 Salem Planning Board • Minutes of Meeting Thursday, July 6, 2000 A regular meeting of the Salem Planning Board was held on Thursday, July 6, 2000 in the cafeteria at the Bentley School, Memorial Drive, Salem, MA. Those present were: Chairman Walter Power, John Moustakis, Bill Cullen, Chuck Puleo, Gene Collins, Lee Harrington and Bill Luster. Also present were Senior Planner Denise Sullivan and Eileen Sacco, Clerk. Walter Power stated that the Board would be taking the agenda out of order this evening. Public Hearing - Site Plan Review - Peabody Essex Museum - Liberty Street and Essex Street Carter Harrison, Vice President and a Trustee for the Peabody Essex Museum addressed the Board and explained that he is here to introduce those presenting this evening. He also noted that he is the Chairman of the Building Committee and gave a history of the development plans of the • Museum. Dan Monroe, Executive Director of the Peabody Essex Museum addressed the Board and gave a background on the Museum and the mission of the Museum relating to the expansion plan. Mosha Safdie, the Architect for the project, gave a presentation on the selection process for an Architect. He reviewed slides that showed how the design evolved and the consideration that was given to the surrounding architecture in the neighborhood. He noted that rather than build a single, imposing structure he has tried to design galleries that resemble small houses and echo the rhythm of individual dwellings found around the downtown. Michael Van Valkenburgh addressed the Board and reviewed the landscaping plans for the project. He stated that they tried to create a uniting place that would feel within the boundaries of Salem. He also reviewed plans for Armory Park which will be built on the site of the Salem Armory and will be dedicated to the Second Corp. of Cadets. He noted that Salem Veterans Administrator Jean Guy Martineau has had input into the proposed park. • ' T" . 151 " r A 0j6j0 15 2 V30 1 e )fis Bj1 118p0 B J298 W e e3600 +, tp BAc n '`9 '15 ' wav 43 192 1.7 a �� -6n� -- – -- -- - - - - - - - - e lag 8964 �aC Ia6W ' 2688 \ 1`-���1,3 AC 'P -- 7 f 02 N i A o 9605 0 > g6 \5A. •y o s s Z' Z s .� � • I ! � TION 64 x� N N v 2987 •� C x0 i„ 18; °o $a, 1851° �. 2\ o U A_ 16°\ 822 S 2 ` a9 ,� -.9'h ,: G 0 N 39 e ,, 5 ��Z 9 5 q� 1 N Trs 4" 35x 5\ GE N w A s 425 56 o pF'� O 5580 tat . ` 5 xQ. �O' �� ,•' \ O.s 412 ZZ9 20,000, N °6 \ P�G\\.� 1.03 AC 41 f 1.29 AC 1 `96_5 _ - `►+ �\ HpV�N FP \,�.�•cE ORNE 3225 I . 409Y 6 4 2526 �` \0s� m `Hp'fEl- 56 z •a 10,768 \k&C -1 3eb5 9e 96 x61 THEE ( ��' IQ 2 v9 9T-IT'/2 05 0] 0 40-5 46 Q �5a 17 los -(�^M�' 88 ��. �2 \ON OCMs. 1 IB m 3f(3 0 40 3gl 0 '53 Q\' Ql`� ® x•° z3 I a �,(� dg5 fj T4 211 1$ _ 811 1 PFPGE 73� `is ,\ \3 Op.�-��`( �z• �2"- •0 s 276 X25 11 G < 2 \� x+ xe `� 1 v ,q\ ° , 1 I W Kw>� `11 1 �T\; 1 N gp8 \' 3• 9 1 �i 190 �00 2400 'f—, ', 1 11 : .]z" ` ° • A. � Q 1 '� IN I 'I 6� 4' 8 1 1 �1 J' �+ � ° 36t 79634 SF 2f'5 � ,9 . .Lay L. 2` ' 1 O 1 11,E i jjg53F16775 ip� 2258 S -1 � AIF /t/ 15 KWAy �G�G p 20? 616 3�/ ,vd'- OV- \ 6 _ ' 2 A MIxti ,,�qq 9498 \t E .I 595uo , "' r 1'1 286 42 604 t AC 1,�i , N' 3` 6 t� na 1206 N 1' 11 a I = 330U i 21980 _ I.B3 EAslp B437 ,. 5 \ 21� ,Lr� C5 6\0GJ- 1NQ gQUP \26 82 10 '0. 1 � 1 1 j 2 OV%A \ 43 �8 ,L23 j1Qt 2 206 Zzl Pedestttans x9s.s \ �plat 15�j8 11 11-II I 'La G2;a 26yd Iia� pg 7 Ig165 10582 , rt9 ,] �. \` �Q 1 25 ` s4 9e '.'-19991'.3 °5 o \� 5 j3 FIGURE 1 1 , 4 Q 9e jee-1 zo1 193 > 2 U m G 'o 1 Zt]i Ila Xzoe 9�' 31 1575 ' p h 1 l -4'` N 428 AMBIENT SOUND LEVEL MEASUREMENT LOCATIONS (0) g Ez°,- a3 ENP c^ AND PROPOSED NEW HVAC EQUIPMENT (0) S 2 240 x°e zE 90� 4984 9 2 237 27 �� MAP SOURCE: CITY OF SALEM z1 c 2 6042 P� 241 8215 _ 31 NpL 2,�p ASSESSORS MAPS 2512937 Z \ E m 72 " ' 6t2 2.j0A �, 5 T R SHEET NO. 35 (partial) oe m? 9 �— m 50 s� % REVISED 1993 : c 3s2 249 p � 1 � sa > - a 608 - 2 39 272 SCALE: 1" = 100' D Z5Z rn 2.47 t^ 3845 / °•s a>3 q3 3z\0 26 489 Mr. Walter Power 4 November 18 , 1996 Scenario Nearest Res . - Nearest Res . - Essex St . Brown St . Existing--Background (L90) 46 dB (A) 41 dB (A) Average (Lq) 54 dB (A) 58 dB (A) Maximum (L.) 72 dB (A) 78 dB (A) Museum HVAC units (all 4) 47 dB (A) 45 dB (A) Future Background (L90) 49 dB (A) 46 dB (A) Increase Over Existing 3 dB (A) 5 dB (A) (Nighttime) I will be attending the Planning Board public hearing on Thursday evening November 21 in the event you have any further questions on the conclusions presented in this letter. Sincerely, TECH ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. Robert D. O'Neal Member, Acoustical Society of America RDO/L1 CC . Will Phippen, Peabody Essex Museum Mr. Walter Power 3 November 18, 1996 inside a house with the windows closed. ' It must be remembered that the noise levels estimated in the previous paragraph will be reduced by another 17 dB (A) with the windows open and by another 27 dB (A) with the windows closed while in an apartment unit . Several design options have been incorporated to reduce rooftop noise impacts as well as to reduce future operational noise impacts . These include putting the HVAC units on a timer so that during the nighttime hours, when the Museum is closed, the temperature requirements will be significantly less than during the daytime . This will reduce noise levels of the Library chiller by approximately one-half through decreased fan and compressor usage . The rooftop units have been oriented so that the quietest ends are facing the streets . Shielding of the other rooftop equipment has been used to reduce noise impacts on receptors off the Museum property. These noise reduction measures have been included in the future sound level calculations presented above . CONCLUSIONS In summary, worst-case Peabody Essex Museum rooftop noise impacts at the nearest residences will be less than a 10 dB (A) broadband sound level increase . This is demonstrated by the sound levels calculated at the nearest residences which include the benefit of the noise reduction measures noted above . Total impact from the Peabody Essex Museum will be less than a 5 dB (A) increase over existing sound levels during the quietest overnight period. During the day, when ambient background levels are higher, the increase will be even less . To put these sound levels in perspective, a sound level change of 3 dB (A) or less is imperceptible to the human ear while a change of 5 dB (A) may be just noticeable . Therefore, the closest residents on Essex Street will not perceive any change in noise levels as a result of the Museum project, while the nearest residents on Brown Street may notice a slight increase in noise levels under worst- case conditions . The data is summarized below. ' US EPA, Information on Levels of Environmental Noise Requisite to Protect Public Health and Welfare with an Adequate Margin of Safety,_ Office of Noise Abatement and Control, Arlington, VA, EPA Report No. 550/9-74-004 ; March 1974 , p. B-6 . y ' Mr. Walter Power 2 November 18 , 1996 representative of what the nearest residents in front of the renovations (Essex Street) and behind the renovations (Brown Street) will hear. The two monitoring locations with respect to the Museum are shown in the attached Figure 1 . The pre-construction average sound levels (Leq) ranged from 54 dB (A) to 58 dB (A) at Essex and Brown Streets respectively. The ambient background (L90) sound levels ranged from 41 dB (A) to 46 dB (A) at these same locations . The existing maximum sound levels (I.) were 72 dB (A) on Essex Street and 78 dB (A) on Brown Street . The existing sound levels are dominated by vehicular traffic and mechanical-type noise from area buildings . No pure tones were present at either location. FUTURE SOUND LEVELS The primary new sources of noise from the Museum will come from the two rooftop units at the Museum Office Center and the two rooftop units at the Plummer/Daland Library. The HVAC equipment will consist of the following equipment manufactured by The Trane Company (or equivalent) : Museum Office Center • 30-ton Intellipak unit 1 (AHU1) , • 30-ton Intellipak unit 2 (AHU2) . Plummer/Daland Library • 70-ton Air-cooled Series "R" chiller, • Air-handling unit (AHU) approximated by 30-ton Intellipak. Reference sound power level data for this equipment were obtained from the manufacturer in accordance with the Air Conditioning & Refrigeration Institute Standard 270 . These data were then extrapolated to the nearest residences on Essex Street and Brown Street . The four new Peabody Essex Museum rooftop units combined are predicted to be approximately 47 dB (A) at the 3rd-floor window at 129 Essex Street and approximately 45 dB (A) at the 2nd-floor window at 8 Brown Street . Sound levels at the 1st-floor are expected to be approximately 1 dB (A) lower. Combining the future Museum HVAC units with the existing background levels yields future ambient background levels (1,90) of 49 dB (A) and 46 dB (A) respectively. Therefore, the HVAC units will increase background sound levels by 3 dB (A) at the nearest residence on Essex Street and by 5 dB (A) at the nearest residence on Brown Street . State noise regulations limit equipment noise increases to no more than 10 dB (A) above existing ambient . The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has published guidance that exterior sound levels are reduced by approximately 17 dB (A) inside a house with the windows open, and approximately 27 dB (A) Tech Environmental, Inc. Reservoir Place 1601 Trapelo Road Waltham, MA 02154 (617)890-2220 November 18, 1996 Ref 1469 Mr. Walter Power, Chairman Salem Planning Board City of Salem One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Re: Noise Study -- Peabody Essex Museum, Salem Phase I Design Development Dear Mr. Power: Tech Environmental, Inc . has been retained by the Peabody Essex Museum to perform a noise study for the proposed building rehabilitations as part of the Phase I design development at the M 1 v Museum in Salem. The objective of this study was to establish existing background noise levels at the nearest residences, and to determine the noise impacts from the Museum' s new rooftop HVAC units at these locations. This letter summarizes the results of our analysis and presents our conclusions that there will be no adverse noise impacts on the nearest residents from the operation of the Museum' s new rooftop mechanical equipment . EXISTING SOUND LEVELS In acoustical terms, the maximum noise level is referred to as the LmM. A noise level that is exceeded more than 90 percent of the time (54 minutes in an hour) is referred to as an Lqo. This is commonly referred to as the background sound level, i . e . the sound level present when the individual discrete noise events are removed. The average, or equivalent, sound level is referred to as L,q. This is the time-varying sound level averaged over a specified period of time, typically one hour. Ambient baseline sound level monitoring was conducted at the existing site of the Peabody Essex Museum in East India Square in Salem, Massachusetts early Wednesday morning November 6, 1996 . The ambient baseline sound levels were measured at a time period when human activity is at a minimum and thus future noise impacts from the Museum' s rooftop HVAC equipment may be most noticeable . The first measurement was conducted from 11 :55 p.m. to 12 :48 a.m. in front of 129 Essex Street which is a 3-story apartment building. The second measurement was conducted from 1 : 00 a.m. to 1 : 53 a.m. in front of a 2-story house on 8 Brown Street . These sound levels are a,fa—•,4 u tn r ] iY arY.•1.. 1,� } ,_ pa S.. r ay'F'� K" ' �"� 4 t Y y •5 t� '� '� �"xx ��f.k�'^j�i � ��• • y . 'A v 7 �p�j. 'G�r �F #��gy�5 � � ��L�' p# A^ a (.1 t ,�+r w�,y '• y � 9 y��Fy-�y'�'�3s {(;� r t 3 t tl ! 5 iti'� � si � �tM ,s $ 4 i• �4dmf ",f' n x7F f OKI. v '�7n t 5+ yy 'Y r � °' ��,{� ��F ✓ h�5� � r�jrt.� •k i i qr�5 � { n ^_a A7F4c :.:' 'l, ,�p�..:i^n 3t /,'� ��ryf�C�n'�� +*}7�t�' � Sty. ¢�,yVx'&yln��''_�y}'a-�''�,��2 .a'akla , ��4 ,hc1 �kt,•11h�.h, 4 �,.. dq �18'� ! �j1v.a.' ,. 1�'l^ ,. 3 1s t k• h,�1 l�+t{�U 4.$ h 'to � c 'N ��°ui. ,.u3 # x-""t.5 r �r� '[' 4t A 'I s r t �<��• .�1 g a " � f ! N�� 't2 ,,•6 ` l :�°f i r � � , �� • � r y R w r 4 Pu. r ' > '+` r) � •,.n`x h i i':A" r�,d, � x �,�v.�" e y; a r I -. �� Air 5�f 1•;• 1 } rc + v as }^ rA I s h ° s i '� ,, Fns Amir 7} .+�M. „x �4a �c, �(re ��e I '� r i ;:�4Yi Fs{ F 5r i� F'. en ✓'S"' 4�V,:gC` +pjjrv. r •+�°wy¢y •sr�S3^y�,ji; £�".. .'a7 , „7 I n v���} �C>il n^� aY tr � n „�., � �'T '�, t��1d7 PS rl Y r �.t` �' .+' r r�+'• tq, f {� E ,{4 he�Fa '$tip �'�a( aY.�s ri 'nSFA���q`a z4 i, j �X ,3 , f( y � y Sb,. } ,�.��4v ,a '•S _ m lv ,'�',$, d # s..- n 1 ur+tax s a r'� � .�V cY'a t',S+v ..%" *➢� ,V t 't l��d�, �(i .z�'�. r i. q•r � §Fu _r} �'.7 n� +3 '{�'r�i,ia 4` ,�,�j.i3tiA' tib.(5??♦♦s�ya�l +tl � ..f�Q }�'��{� ("sa Y) i��� -x ;tN[l �,rA. d ��f r� e{��n. Y tv ;@y.4�+,i✓ W # ��1L ,�" � la�+ l�(1 � i�+" L+ t��+, ",+, t ` p�'3 �{�S�i ����+ �y'�v�'�r �y,iakv`d�c'��kc3 f "rti 1� �` �It_,s r� s FO� :�yc+�7 r .s1 w ��Xt .• `ti< , � r ' d ry a { ,i d+• u� #„ tt`L wi ,fir 9 f E w W 1. EC" sit r VII-4 fr^ t ry r�,j..`, R I ' u,rn.',9�f�.�la• "k r+ .�4��' w k' �v ";tk >3 ' � i i 1 fa +.,. wi F f . ����� �r��:ytn"� ��,r^Yz„4a ��3rq£� eF,'., � ;,� l 5S'.atip+.fi,7p�' 1J (W'rrk i� tl r�vk•} 'i.&�' u � d s * � f %& ,y y n},kS ,^ r++ Pr'+�iy �aA a r�+Rt{,: + � y�l".yl yS't"* .l 45� .y<t.��{ i 45 t'• Q�+. �f4� +. 'f+'4' .`�` 1 A �p,y '�?'.i � z q ( '' 7t✓ ���"'.,{ �h..F 7+2 a'5 b re. {� 1�.1{'�,,,"t" ,`�.I k 'r ^v r ,5-Y,s .'4 'A' �.fi ,1FV } et� t'=' :;in Ak9 4., v ,' , 7 • '+ be ✓s 1 - ., E t } ; `:5�� _ `"`py"�� , �kt�v a• e ry EYlrvs+z t I�f k5 t ! t r v a ,17:i�v i�'[ r r:tif� Ind rt csd qG. �" � lT n {{iy�f A fi' : � e ➢��Na e 1 i [� , d t R�.i: f >I#f.J Y i 1 4:•a + 'k°iR fiV �, e� kC%t +d4 •�v=J3 {j .,t '(� -z r S v �.,. f'.�r ad e 1 0 ��: y$ �»•i'.n'^7a'+.v'�'ayh e . r fi. , . : fl, a ! �v �i"'tY. I 3 ''x'r d^< � h� a rs �, d � v � i �, i ` a i.$iyrr 6 � +xrtl�.' � 1a• , r � � •Y y � �A �� � S , i�r tr b t � Q r% �,y : �;! �,(�^ n � � 1 t f5y ip f ,;�5 Vn y'I h � .• t E !r � r . � v '� rt S ilh # �� .G'�.iY pia 7" ''� , t, ' �� t t . in �.� � �p8 � #i s '� {� ��t r �• ' x1 �'S�ld4 �� ' ,ar r c f nR i '.1 ut, < ' s 7y .�. ,.� �.'+ ��•}rf,�Crr< f. 'r��.v'• � Fp '.�,��. ti�(t tk # � ' la�ti��^P m� t ;'k r,r<jl'�(�' t :. �' 4✓'r>'r'" "4.'a�"k,JB p � �t14�P r�'tw �5e��n i�' rS � r,+ � fY.,r r`�I��tl i. .ASV' � �., �r y£'�ajr }3 Y°'S$'` ,gy+� i •L +#�� �`is t % i. � J V i c .i � e '+ �^ � -� f r • .y" t�af1 + r+t ,a # 9 lx. y %q;y (C�i cw�. 1n Y ",R}A �: , pt 9 ^ ll ,5;" S4 R -� d ,"' i�� �( b �r`t�lfl F �' •w�xra e � ywi r�Q�e+l ;a8� ' ' �F�' �' t . c �rF t a r p , rzx- . w'r,E4 ✓�✓ �t �;�r , , r i.4 wt �My�Yf� TP ��: ♦�?v -^ .'''� A � Fj k>�fi k+ �R � �� (n,�ra�'�� � , ,��• tj .n,` r S�d�yay�4`�ati. � t�" r�"j's, + ��}y�"{.;�pq,�q��'�-�,�' "t+��'J,7�;' f t r r .r rt ���t� h � i• t8 'S r g�j# i� 5} ' i,at .v d,,�' �p y w# 7. a l�r•. i �„' r A s 5 t .K t � i`t { ^' � �J r . ^� ,}(• � s� *� i�, §.,{E r syt i rV �F � SJ t ZB I ,�.'. u S �� 1,'y a atf #} P V �'”�,'�r'yl�� �^ a�� ���- ( r r'r� 1 �u r� � :; Y; t' "">� ' �,� , l;c' � �• �'- t� ` - �Mr° %'1 .'�S i� m ra 1l •,ki�� 'f � � [ , r IR ,1 r , 5 �C. �': �t :., ��9 1'� ��.T_I:` r � �g �ZIS�� Atc k+ 1 a 9 xv l nh � ^iii a E �a�� 1 + 4 1! i eg i � ty lTv., .�.t �r �• TT— ,N4 T , s, •< h t < ^t ana`o1M {+� �, kR^•, F 1 v ava 5v+a x� �}'s y'r # 1 L�=gr�c ��' k lX �yryli # �# - -trr r � �. t $in h v' S ',a ,#l.l• � !h ° �J A n r S� � r "� E � :k v � �� •h" �`r� 5 °.•r ��' '� � 'b .�;g►" t*3+`�S�'��' t k✓Y � 9� y� +f -F� � 'Ll'"r'u ul`� t R +'�'�.r�.5t� '� ' � fa�4� �,!�i u�tY(ii =is �1(�Z�E.r� (,# �� t'����''.�4,t��, +�, � L Z�Z'• 5 � �t�.Y,r �,*ti1�:'.� 7 � lyj ""' ':�+ �j,h- iJ' �t # y� ri�l i �,�✓ ,� trI "'b , f4M t l ^} ! r, t. . + " e�d��rr v C , a"' � # ` � c• rai S J t+! ;. � .. - St v Y { t � g Zr n ,,,, E fit f s� 5 Y ^ y S r r f- R "r;. , �.• �;(' f .r s r t,lr ry'a rsy .� + � `� wl" J3 ���� �•I� #7 3J Y-, ?ja�^ � r , ^ rti'w '�S"�� N k of J r ti. i ka 14 < � # �.� a r I r �(��`F �w57� ..` v 4 }�• .-y1 5�. � t� ... �t�{�, � ttM a r r r ���y .5 s H l � ��.�t�.�tlfy1 �'rN,�{1�:S�x� 4 N,}4,5f�.•k 6r >� r p o4i � /�..L t � P r x � al. jk t ,r , a�,.r ' r7lQI µ� rr',2r fD} fi. . l4 ( �•. ,FQrQ� r rld 5 t ��a�,fi, # _ t r 4�v. � �� a v54 fi`5 Ik`�i1�$(�•�. Iri'(�y vk -�1k S d , ' l� ♦t f. tr t�� @ryiC t yy i S, ^ , t s l r 1 �.��J't �,�3��7.��r r7 r d^.�+• L � �l5 �yra uf✓ SRo v.{y SP�td r�, r2xC 7#1 f-i;`'�`t a' r I = �. # Y i °`r"r P' S� � �t � [hY '.rjl".I�,i F ' 1F �•al� �r + � !R h d �\ � 4 .� 4 .P � # £ ° rlt c Y y •�XYs �:�J�Ig ta��,�'� 5 t 't y-'r�l V_ ._ u t .f Ktf � A '". � �� ri s}.y�hav.hi'�y�y 'fain wru rrrybb j h• R e - .b f �� v✓ ."u,�� % �i"�1 .(� k�M � F ��2 t �ML�{�.1.1! +. vl�+Y�}t`"�Rf�'3��r����"Ye"7�'e>•�k lLat i��. _ �T. ra' ,W�'!i Y.51S {^ ,45 a c � � I�a i�G7 �y1,1 A• . h {p 4 y L '(� �et� #j,,X` a 5 + 4}r�t'f✓p{.,��� 4ivy Rq�� ili, gra �r kyr� ' �f a & vpt<lirrr ! 7�i _l x a tyr ur iris � �b ( - " MON ,. t. .'ham:.. Memo to Salem Planning Board 2 December 5, 1996 opened in October 1995 found levels (L90) of 40-42 dB (A) Late night post-construction sound levels measured with Wendy' s shut- down in August 1996 found background levels of 55-56 dB (A) at these same two locations . These were increases of 13 dB (A) and 16 dB (A) from fall to summer. Therefore, a conservative estimate of increased summer background levels around the Museum is 10 dB (A) . The Library chiller is actually not a "new" source of noise but is actually replacing seven (7) window air conditioners currently being used by the Museum. In summary, worst-case noise impacts from the Museum are listed below. The Museum impacts assume the quietest chiller (Carrier) is selected. A change of 3 dB (A) or less is considered inaudible to the human ear. Therefore, the proposed renovations to the Museum' s rooftop HVAC systems will not cause a noticeable change in sound levels to the nearest residents . Nearest Nearest Residence Residence Scenario Essex St. Brown St. Cooling Season Existing Background (estimated) 56 dB (A) 51 dB (A) Future Museum Impacts (inc. chiller) 42 dB (A) 47 dB (A) Total Future Background 56 dB (A) 52 dB (A) Increase Over Existing (Nighttime) 0 dB (A) 1 dB (A) Non-Cooling Season Existing Background (measured) 46 dB (A) 41 dB (A) Future Museum Impacts (no chiller) 41 dB (A) 32 dB (A) Total Future Background 47 dB (A) 42 dB (A) Increase Over Existing (Nighttime) 1 dB (A) 1 dB (A) l 4 Tech Environmental, Inc. Reservoir Place 1601 Trapelo Road Waltham, MA 02154 (617)890-2220 MEMORANDUM To: Salem Planning Board Ref 1469 From: Rob O'Neal, Tech Environmental, Inc . Re : Peabody Essex Museum -- Noise Impacts Date : December 5, 1996 This memo is a follow-up to my letter dated November 18 , 1996 regarding the noise impacts from the Museum' s new rooftop HVAC units at the nearest residential locations . In response to the Planning Board' s request to lower potential noise impacts from this equipment, three refinements were made to the first analysis . 1) Discussions with the mechanical engineers on the project yielded sound level data from two other chiller manufacturers capable of meeting the Museum' s summer cooling requirements . Both of these vendors (York, Carrier) offered equipment which was quieter than the initial assumption using The Trane Company. 2) Equipment locations on the Plummer/Daland Library roof were refined using revised drawings from the architects . 3) Discussions with the mechanical engineers on the operation of the Library chiller confirmed that this piece of equipment will only operate during the cooling season. A furnace located in the Library basement will provide heat during the heating season. The analysis submitted to you on November 18, 1996 conservatively assumed all four pieces of new rooftop equipment would operate 12 months per year. However, the chiller will only operate during the summer months . Since the chiller is the primary contributor to projected future sound levels at residences on Essex Street and Brown Street, it is important to also calculate impacts during the non-cooling season without the chiller. In addition, ambient sound levels during the summer months are generally higher than the winter months due to increased outdoor human activity, and air conditioner use . The recently approved Wendy' s Restaurant on Peabody Street and Lafayette Street in Salem provides the hard data to substantiate this assertion. Late night background sound levels measured at two locations before Wendy' s 10/1131/00 WED 11:49 FAX 978 741 4683 SSD&C LLP 978 741 4683 Q003 The Honorable Stanley J. Usovicz, Jr. October 18, 2000 Page Two Please call me with any questionsDenise e concerns. and have also sent a copy of this language rick Reffett. 5 cerely, � J s h C. Correnti JCC:dl 10/1S/00 WED 11`7':) FAX 978 741 4683 SfDr%C LLP -978 741 4683 0 002 SERAFINI, SERAFIlNI, DARLING & CORRENTI, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 63 FEDERAL STREET SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE JOHN R- 6ERAFINI. 5A. - - ' - 976-700-0212 JOHN R. SERAFINI. JR. 786501.2769 JOHN E. DARLING TELECOPIER JOSEPH C. CORRENTI 3 7p-7a1-46p3 ROBERT T- FORD October 18, 2000 VIA TEIdECOPIER The .Honorable Stanley J. USOViCZ, Jr. City Hall 93 Washington Street Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Re: Peabody Essex Museum Dear Stan: Sej.ow please find lan,,uage which I believe addresses tl-,r-- issue of pedestrian access betweNn Essex and Charter Streets through the Museum Public Garden. . The Museum is willing to take this 13.nguage as a c(-:udition of its Site Plan Review Decision with the Planning Board. I believe this protects the I Board's and the City's interc,sts. "The Museum shall provide continuous and open pedestrian access between Essex Street and Charter Str4iat through the Public Gai7den, as shown on the plans submitted herewith, as a condition of this Decision. The pedestrian access shall .be open to the public 24 hour: a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year. The Museum shall maintain the walkways and keep them free from debris and the access shall be. adequately lighted at all times by the Museum. The Museum shall not substantially change, alter. , restrict or amend the pedestrian access as shown on the plans unless and until such changes, alteratiasis restrictions or amendments are first approved by a tuo- thirds majority of Planning Board members after pub?-ic notice and meeting. Any such proposed changes mi_.st demonstrate that unrestricted pedestrian access shall be maintained. " PLANNING BOARD SPECIAL PERMIT ( )BUSINESS PARK DEVELOPMENT ( )BANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ( )CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT ( SITE PLAN REVIEW ( )FLOOD HAZARD DISTRICT ( )WETLANDS DISTRICT Applicant No Applicant: �,qc S2 Project Descripti n: S S � o) f)eto Contact Person: �,c City: 17V -Oaia Phone: ***************************************************************** 1 . Received by Planning Board ( 5 copies) /J//7 A? (applicant must also file with City Clerk) w M a rt rt rt W 7• (D }. N p F 2 . Distributed for comments (by) 0 wE r• � rt fD 3 . Comments received ( by) � a m w H � m 4 . Public Hearing m W C a. Advertise 14 days before hearing a Date /o/ gq & �D 6. b. Notice sent to: Applicant/Owner , w Building Inspector, City Engineer , 7 Board of Health, Conservation Commission, o Historic Commission, Abuttors, Beverly, Danvers, Peabody, Lynn, Swampscott, Marblehead. m Date sent by 5. Decision by Planning Board a. Approval (by 2/3) Denial m v o M rt F+ (D (D b. Notice: Applicant/Owner , City Clerk, a ' Building Inspector, City Engineer , 0 0 0 Board of Health, Conservation Commission, Other . �, rtm a � Date sent by M m w m v o 6. Recorded in Registry of Deeds ° m ° (Applicant ' s responsibility) Ph P EX\DH\COMSHEET � P � C.4t I 1 yiLNJ1d rT m 1 L1 I 3e a a:-G D.Ct i OPTION II PEA30DY ESS;X%;$EjV OF :nLEk T�O—WAY .. ljl_JI M p4AA i »t5 i I i F1 REMOVE EXIONO CURB WI M-2 3c Si sr�i.s,.e ✓ I BIOS WI IL i •..I SIOP Br111 eal� BM w PEAS(DY E'_cE% M�SEr M SALEII 1 _ B MARK — _RICL CP c- � \✓ R dyvn� Q 1{ $ h % + I R uVSC.Uvt COOPER--NE Of SAiEM,, 11IC. II tll Ir_J �K { I Sa EM +14?OR'S CEMTcR new. I I k ARMORY ;I {1 I r t ® SQUARE m ® o eecu t • �.4,� � 4 t • 7dP!y,yd5tu xB+3 Tyu, }' cSEF S1F_Ei � _� �' 4a9 1{� dl4 P':" 4 PRY + r 40 0 20 40 80 O d at I �, }° ; _"• ass ` SCALE: 1" = 40' b June 21, 2000, Page 7 all were in favor and the motion so carried. Ms. Guy read a letter from Denise Sullivan, Asst. City Planner,regarding the fire station at 142 North Street and the proposal to install copper louvers over the openings in the belfry and requesting any comments on the proposal. The Commission was in favor of the proposal as submitted. Ms. Guy read a letter from Omnipoint asking to change the design of the antennas approved for installation at the Hawthorne Hotel from a concealment process to a handpainted process. Mr. Stevens made a motion to approve the amendment. Mr. Mangifesti seconded the motion, all were in favor and the motion so carried. Ms. Guy stated that she issued a Certificate ofNon-applicability for 10 Hamilton Street(repainting). Ms. Guy stated that she received a copy of a letter from MHC to the MEPA unit requesting additional information on the JPI project at the former Parker Brothers site. Mr. Kasparian stated that he sent the comment letter regarding the project. Ms. Guy stated that she received a letter from MHC determining that the proposed cellular installation at 1000 Loring Avenue will unlikely affect significant historic or archaeological resources. There being no further business,Ms. Guinee made a motion to adjourn. Mr. Mangifesti seconded the motion, all were in favor and the motion so carried. Respectfully submiaed, 9ofo ission ti June 21, 2000, Page 5 heritage in the downtown and that an exhibit be created. Mr. Mangifesti stated that if the Commission can gain more on the City's behalf by causing the delay, it would be worth it. He noted that there was no benefit to delay the Empire building,but was concerned of there being a vacant site if the expansion did not proceed. Mr. Grimes stated that in order to include all factors of parking easements, museum programming and the agreement with the City,they cannot preserve the Empire building. He stated that the Museum agrees to do the photography and material sampling and that they would be willing to do a photographic exhibit on Salem's commercial heritage. Mr. Kasparian asked about assurance of financing and permitting so that the City won't be left with a vacant lot. Mr. Grimes stated that they have made great strides in the financing campaign and have raised $85 million. Mr. Correnti stated that discussions have been held at length with the Mayor and the.Solicitor in order to develop the agreement to turn over the city street and parking lot. Included with the demolition of the Empire is the sequencing of permits, demonstration of financing resources and having the parkway in place prior to the closing of Liberty Street. He stated that specific siting issues will be addressed before the Salem Redevelopment Authority. He stated that the Commission is not being asked to approve demolition, but to see if there is a valid reason why not to delay. He noted that an exhaustive study was undertaken. Mr. Kasparian stated that it has been established that the rear ell is not related to the Mormon historical associations, but is a significant architectural feature of the building. It was built in response to the fire of 1866. He asked if there was an alternate siting that would allow the rear ell to be preserved. Mr. Grimes stated that they have looked at all site and that no other location works. Will Phippen stated that they investigated in the community to see if there was anyone interested in taking these properties, but there were no takers. Mr. Kasparian asked how it was advertised. Mr. Phippen stated that it was word of mouth and discussed with Salem Harbor CDC. Mr. Kasparian asked if it was publicly advertised. Mr. Phippen replied in the negative. Mr. Kasparian asked if the London Plain tree was being retained. Ms. Salano stated that it is not possible to save,but that they are replacing it with a series of street trees. Mr. Kasparian stated that a curator of Mormon Americana at Brigham Young University in Provo,Utah has told him about a current book entitled Sacred Places, guide to Mormon historic sites, and could be given the courtesy of comment. He also stated that he felt further delay could be used to formulate recommendations. Mr. Grimes stated that he will order the book tomorrow. r June 21, 2000, Page 6 Tom Houston stated that both structures have massive stone steps and are sited so as to step from the street to the steps in the same way as the existing site. They will bring with the house, the required number of feet of foundation in order to have the same exposure. They will do substantial grading to address the slope and put in a retaining wall along the boundaries. They have to provide two off-street parking spaces. Mr. Untne stated that they will need to peel back the walls to see what is existing and to determine the treatment of the walls. Mr. MCDermet stated that because the Museum says it will do a project is not justification for waiving. He felt the Commission should assure itself that it is the best solution. He stated he would like more information to convince the Commission that the Museum cannot move the two ells. Mr. Kasparian stated that the Commission can delay the project for six months and get nothing or can outline specific items which we hope to get as concessions and continue the delay for that purpose. Mr. Grimes stated that in the spirit of the Demolition Delay Ordinance,the Museum has done a dramatic amount of research to determine how to execute, plan and interpret. He stated that he feels they have done their homework and have responded to the questions raised. He stated that they need some latitude to accomplish this in a most expedient and appropriate manner. Mr. Kasparian stated that there is a inscribed stone in the basement of 42 Charter Street and questioned whether it might be a burial site. Mr. Grimes stated that it appears to be workman's graffiti. The Museum will break up the floor around it and examine it as part of the documentation process. Mr. Kasparian felt that the stone and comment by the author of the book Sacred Places may warrant further delay. Mr. Grimes stated that the curators of the Museum do not feel the stone is something that came from a cemetery. Mr. Kasparian suggested a motion to offer recommendations for treatment of all three buildings as provided in the minutes of all meetings and site visits and including the inventory of documentation provisions and the letters submitted by Mr. McDermet, Mr. Goff and Historic Salem, Inc. He stated that the Commission should find that the buildings are significant and warrant preservation to the extent feasible with the framework of this major urban development scheme. The recommendations should reflect the comments of all the recommendations received and be sent to the Salem Redevelopment Authority and other boards that have purview. Ms. Guinee so moved. Mr. Desrocher seconded the motion, all were in favor and the motion so carried to waive the Demolition Delay Ordinance. Other Business Ms. Guinee made a motion to approve the minutes of 5/3/00. Mr. Mangifesti seconded the motion, all were in favor and the motion so carried. Mr. Mangifesti made a motion to approve the minutes of 6/10/00. Mr. Desrocher seconded the motion, June 21, 2000, Page 3 Mr. Stevens asked if it will be fir decking. Mr. Curley replied in the affirmative. Mr. Curley stated that he is not touching the roof. Ms. Guinee made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Mr. Desrocher seconded the motion, all were in favor and the motion so carried. 42 Charter Street, 10 Liberty Street & 133 Essex Street In continuance of a previous meeting, the Peabody Essex Museum submitted applications to waive the Demolition Delay Ordinance to demolish the one story section located in the rear of 10 Liberty Street,to demolish the three story section located in the rear of 42 Charter Street and for total demolition of 133 Essex Street. Attorney Joseph Correnti stated that the waivers are being requested under the separate applications and that the Museum will be spending a lot of money to preserve the two houses and move them to Charter Street. The move will duplicate what the streetscape once looked like and the houses will be sited where two houses once sat. The later additions from each of the houses need to be removed. The Commission attended a site visit since the last meeting. At 10 Liberty Street, the rear portico and stair will be preserved. John Grimes stated that he has a letter of support from CID Associates which states that the ells were not part of the original structure. Mr. Grimes provided a chronology of the Mormon history as it relates to 10 Liberty Street. The Mormons were not associated with the addition. He noted that Vilate Young may be included in Salem's Women's Heritage Trail. Bonnie Smith, who runs the trail in Boston, stated that with trails such as this, one gets more of a feel of how someone lived than from a book. She felt it will be very effective. Mr. Grimes provided an inventory of the elements of the three buildings to be included in scale drawings, photographs, paint samples and archive fragments. He provided a letter from Dan Monroe indicating that the Museum will seek to obtain National Register status for each house in its own right. Mr. Grimes stated that the Museum has a commitment to the City to proceed in a coordinated way, which could be jeopardized if the cannot do the work in September as planned. They are spending significant dollars to keep construction crews mobilized. Tor Untne stated that they have a schedule structured to accommodate Haunted Happenings. The expansion excavation is scheduled to start November 2"d. The houses need to be moved prior to November 2"d. Each month pushed out moves the construction schedule, which could mean failure to enclose the building and delays in the interior work. Mr. Untne stated that a one month delay could result in more than a one month delay on the other end at a cost of over$200,000 per month. Tom Houston of CID Associates stated that the dimensions of the yards meet the yard setbacks and provide two parking spaces as required by zoning. The siting of the houses addresses the requirement for a pedestrian corridor linking Essex to Charter of which the proposed garden esplanade is the only location which can provide public garden space. The siting also addresses the easement to Saccon Jewelers and the ten parking spaces for the Salem Housing Authority. June 21, 2000, Page 4 ti Laura Salano of Michael Van Valkenburgh Associates provided a rendition of the siting of the houses and stated that they are transporting the character of the existing landscape elements. Mr. Grimes stated that the additions don't fit in the scheme to allow the Museum to meet the other needs. John Goff stated that he was thankful that the Museum allowed him to walk through the houses since he could not attend the site visit. Mr. Goff read a letter into the record which he said was mailed to Mr. Grimes this day. Staley McDermet provided the Commission with the portion of the Museum's letter that responds to Historic Salem's comments about the houses. Mr. McDermet stated that significance of the two houses has been established enough to warrant further study. He recommended not granting the waiver at this time and submitted four conditions for waiver of the Demolition Delay Ordinance for this and any other proposed demolition in Salem. Mr. McDermet noted that the Pickering Wharf properties are demolished and through no intent of the owner are now stuck in lawsuit. He noted that even the best of intentions can go bad. John Wright, former curator of the Museum and former Design Review Board member, stated that he agreed with Mr. McDermet that no building should be demolished unless another structure is to be built. He also stated that he felt the additions have become significant as additions. Mr. Mangifesti stated that if the Commission could govern if the buildings could be torn down, he would be opposed. He felt that since the Commission can only delay, it would be beating a dead horse. He noted that the Museum is saving two buildings rather than complete demolition. He stated that the proposed demolition is inevitable and if it will help matters to vote now in favor of the waiver and save some money,then the Commission should just do it. Mr. Stevens stated that the general feeling is the ells and the Empire building are not as pertinent as the main buildings. He stated that everything is a compromise. He preferred more details on the siting of the houses, how big are the lots,more information on the fences and granite posts and the treatment of the walls to be exposed. Mr. Stevens noted that in order to move the buildings, foundations must be in place which eliminates one of Mr. McDermet's points. Mr. Stevens stated that he assumed the money was in place. Mr. Grimes noted that the moving of the buildings is the first phase of the expansion project. Ms. Guinee stated that most of the questions have been answered that were raised at the last meeting. She stated that she felt the same as Mr. Mangifesti, but felt pressured that the decision needs to be made quickly. Mr. Kasparian stated that the Empire building is of architectural significance and is a substantial example of the art-deco style. He felt it is the most prominent example of its type. Mr. Kasparian suggested that the Museum consider preserving it. He also suggested that there be measured plans and elevations drawings including details of the Terrazzo painting, that there be detailed photography , that some material examples be extracted including the Terrazzo and the neon sign, that Saccon's Jewelers and the marine gallery property be protected and that an historian be hired to document the commercial June 21, 2000, Page 1 SALEM HISTORICAL COMMISSION MINUTES June 21, 2000 A regular meeting of the Salem Historical Commission was held on Wednesday, June 21, 2000 at 7:30 p.m. at One Salem Green, Salem, MA. Present were Chairman Kasparian, Messrs. Stevens, Mangifesti and Desrocher and Ms. Guy. Ms. Guinee arrived later in the meeting. 20A Fowler Street Joseph Taylor presented an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to alter a cellar window at 20A Fowler Street. Also present was Chrissy Desses. A letter from Mr. Taylor was read into the record which stated that the existing window collapsed inward and that the window was altered to be more secure. He noted that it replicates the cellar window opening of his neighbor which is part of the same building. Photographs were provided showing what was there previously and currently. Ms. Guinee joined the meeting at this time. Mr. Stevens asked why the owners do not want a window. Mr. Taylor stated that security is the number one priority and that their neighbor has the same thing in place. He noted that Ms. Desses works at a window company and that they are looking into alternatives. Ms. Desses stated that the window was in two parts and that a two panel hinged window is not readily made. Mr. Stevens asked if it could be a fixed sash. Ms. Desses noted that the opening is the only way in/out of the basement from the outside, so it must be operational. She noted that they could put in bead board,paint it and add hardware. Mr. Mangifesti felt they should investigate a window that could be similar to what was original and that he did not feel the alteration was appropriate. He suggested customizing a standard window. Ms. Desses stated that she did not feel comfortable having glass at ground level and added that they need a door to get furniture, bicycles, etc. in and out of the basement. Mr. Stevens suggested one fixed light sash (i.e. a cellar sash by Brosco),with 9 lights,that is hinged. He noted that a storm window could be put on without approval. There was no public comment. Mr. Kasparian stated that the guidelines find original materials, design and technology to be the most appropriate. He suggested working with a conventional window that is fixed sash or a 6/6 double hung. Mr. Taylor presented a letter from Christine Carr that was read into the record who noted that she,too, had replaced her cellar window approximately two years ago and was in favor of the application. t June 21, 2000, Page 2 Mr. Stevens made a motion to continue the application. Ms. Guinee seconded the motion, all were in favor and the motion so carried. 156 Derby Street Spiro Kounsalieh presented an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to replace two side window openings with one window to match the window on the front fagade. A sketch was provided. Mr. Kounsalieh stated the windows are made by Anderson. He stated that the restaurant is too dark during the day and needs more light. Mr. Stevens stated that the window feels more like a picture window. Mr. Kounsalieh stated that the left side will line up with the window on the second floor. Mr. Stevens stated that the proposed is 7' wide by 318"tall, two casements with a fixed window in the center. He asked if the window was wood. Mr. Kounsalieh stated that it is wood with mahogany on the inside. Ms. Guinee asked if he would add the top treatment to match the front. Mr. Kounsalieh stated that he was not planning to, unless required. Mr. Mangifesti stated that he did not feel it was appropriate and preferred that the applicant duplicate the second floor window. Mr. Kounsalieh stated that it would not fit with the restaurant's drop ceiling. Mr. Kasparian stated that the window in the front looks like a later addition. He felt it may be possible to alter the interior in order to duplicate the window above. Mary Sholds, 155 Derby Street, stated that the side of the building is not appealing and noted that while the window is not historic, it suits the building aesthetically. She felt is was better for the food business as well and stated that she was in favor of the application. Mr. Kasparian felt it was not appropriate for the district. Mr. Mangifesti made a motion to continue the application. Mr. Desrocher seconded the motion, all were in favor and the motion so carried. 155 Derby Street Wharfside Condominium Trust submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to rebuild back porches as original but with changes to meet code. The rail height will change from 37"to 42" and the deck frame will be bolted to the building. Michael Curley represented the applicant and stated that the direction of the framing will also change. ?i Site Visit: 10 June, 2000 1 Page 3 Mr. Kasparian noted that the attic of the 2-story structure has relatively intact early finishes, which appear to be boarding rooms or servants'quarters. The 1-story ell appears to be a kitchen with an internal chimney mass and winding basement access stair,which is currently blocked. Mr. McDermet noted that there are old gas pipelines leading to the east side of the chimney mass, which serve a modern gas heater. Mr. McDermet also cautioned that there is a faint smell of gas in this area of the basement. 42 Charter Street- Gilbert Chadwick House Mr.Johnson stated that the 2-over-2 and 1-over-1 windows on the west wall represent a late 19`h century style and probably post-date the 1866 fire. Mr. Kasparian noted that all of the stone sills and lintels on this wall have at least one through crack. Mr.Johnson pointed out that the west wall of the ell is constructed of brick which is not continuous with the brick wall of the main house and stated that it probably served as a fire separation between an abutting property. Mr. Kasparian stated that the yard between the rear ell and the main house is paved with rounded field stones approx. 18 in.in dimension. Mr. Kasparian noted that the first floor framing is constructed of timbers (approx. 4 inches in width) spaced at approximately 12 inches on center. Mr. Grimes pointed out locations where the foundation and first floor framing had been altered to accommodate the later 19`6 century recessed entrance. Mr. Kasparian noted that there is a square dressed stone carved with the initials (verify: J.G. and F.G.� set flush with the floor of the basement and questioned what it is. Mr. Grimes pointed out blocked window openings in the wall between the ell and the main house which are visible in an interior staircase at the 2'and third floor levels, indicating that the ell was built in front of an earlier exterior wall. Mr. McDermet pointed out later 19`h century window casings and remnants of earlier casework in the 1st and 2nd floors of the main house. General Discussion Mr. Kasparian requested that the Museum submit a copy of the existing measured drawings of the Liberty and Charter Street buildings, indicating their overall footprint dimensions. Mr. Kasparian also requested that the Museum submit a measured site survey plan to verify whether or not the rear ells will fit in their new locations. Mr. Grimes stated that this information is being assembled in order to work out the dimensions of the new building foundations. Mr. Kasparian stated that demolition and building moving will effect the relationship of the Charter and Liberty Street properties to National Register eligibility criteria and requested sufficient information from the Museum in order to re-evaluate eligibility either for continued Site Visit: 10 June, 2000 jy Page 4 listing or de-listing. Mr. Grimes stated that the Museum would probably prefer to maintain National Register listing Mr. McDermet stated that it is important to have an impartial assessment of the significance of the properties and that all significant features and portions of the properties should be preserved if possible. He also stated that the Museum should investigate options and demonstrate an attempt in good faith to preserve as much of the significant structures as possible. Mr. McDermet stated that the significance of the more recent Empire Building should be given equal weight with the earlier buildings,because buildings of this period and style are particularly rare in Salem. Mr. Grimes stated that the Museum has recently hired a new curator of historic structures and is still researching the properties. The Museum will prepare a summary history of the properties and"before" photos will be taken during the week of June 19. Mr. Kasarian requested additional information about the interpretive programming related to p q rPve P g g the relocated buildings. Mr. Monroe stated that the interpretive programming would be limited to the building exteriors and that the buildings will probably be used by the Museum for office space. Mr. Grimes stated that scheduling of the building moving and demolition work is time sensitive and costly and every attempt is being made to not interfere with Haunted Happenings events. Mr. Kasparian requested that the Museum submit a project timeline, indicating critical timing issues. There being no further business,the meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Lance Kaspartan Chair Site Visit: 10 June, 2000 '1 Page 1 SALEM HISTORICAL COMMISSION MINUTES SAT., 10 JUNE 2000 In a continuation of the Meeting of 7 June 2000, a special meeting was held on Saturday, 10 June 2000, at 9:00 am for the purpose of inspecting the properties at 133 Essex Street, 10 Liberty Street, and 42 Charter Street, related to the application for a waiver of the demolition delay ordinance for these buildings. Present were Chairman Kasparian,Messrs. Stephens,Mangifesti and Desrocher. Also present and representing the Peabody Essex Museum were Dan Monroe,John Grimes,Wil Phippen,Dean Lahikainen, Tor Untne, Fred Johnson and Merry Glosband. Staley McDermet was present,representing Historic Salem Incorporated. 133 Essex Street- former Empire Store Building Mr. Grimes reported that the front portion of the building was constructed around 1949, and the rear portion represents a later addition. Mr. Kasparian stated that the building is 51 years old and meets the age requirements for evaluation relative to National Register eligibility. The storefront design is an example of the Art-Deco or Moderne architectural style,with distinctive saw-tooth plan arrangement and extensive use of ornamental precast concrete, multi-colored terrazzo paving and aluminum canopy and storefront glazing. Mr. Grimes stated that hazardous material abatement has been undertaken by the Museum and that the foundation hole will be filled to grade and the building site will be landscaped as a park. Mr. Monroe stated that the Museum has already removed the neon sign from the storefront to their artifact collection. The museum has also identified other building features for preservation, including portions of the ornamental terrazzo paving. Mr.Kasparian noted that the design of the basement stair is also in the Art-Deco or Moderne style and recommended that it be photographed. Mr. Kasparian suggested that the Museum review the Richard Leather Co./ India Jute Mill complex (1867) at the corner of Webb &Cousins Streets,which is also slated for demolition, in conjunction with the documentation of the Museum's proposed demolitions. 10 Liberty Street- John Kinsman House Mr. Grimes stated that the Museum will consider moving granite fence posts, iron fencing and brick paving in conjunction with the house moving. Mr. Grimes stated that the I-story brick ell is an addition which post-dates an extensive 1866 fire in the area. Mr. Grimes pointed out that the brickwork of the 1-story ell is not toothed into the brickwork of the main building on the south or north walls. Mr. Kasparian noted Site Visit: 10 June, 2000 { Page 2 1 that the brick work between the 1 and 2-story ells is partly toothed in on the north wall and fully separated by a vertical joint on the south wall Mr. Grimes stated that the 2-story rear ell is believed to be part of the 1841 construction and will not be demolished. Mr. Grimes also stated the 1-story brick bay window on the south facade of the 2-story ell is thought to be a later addition, which will be retained and moved with the building. Mr. Mangifesti questioned how the new building foundations will be detailed and whether the granite facing would be maintained and if concrete would be visible. Mr. Grimes stated that the foundations below grade will be concrete,but the exterior visible foundations will maintain the existing granite and brick, and concrete will not be visible. Mr. McDermet stated that the granite steps leading to the south door,which abuts the bay window, are constructed integrally with the bay. Mr. Grimes stated that the steps will be moved with the building. On the interior wall between the 1-story ell and the 2-story ell,Mr. Grimes pointed out a blocked window opening and paint evidence concealed beneath the interior plaster finish, indicating that the 1-story ell was built in front of an earlier exterior brick wall. Mr. Grimes also pointed out extensive carbon black film on the brick under the plaster finish, indicating that the exterior wall was probably exposed to the 1866 fire and the addition built after the fire. Mr. Grimes pointed out that the interior casework and trim on the first floor of the 2-story ell and in the 1-story ell are similar and inconsistent with Greek-revival style features of the front rooms of the house. These features are more typical of architectural styles in the 2'half of the 19`h century,indicating that the room with the bay window was probably remodeled at the time when the 1-story ell and bay window were added. Mr. Kasparian noted that the interior foundations of the 2-story structure are constructed with squared rubble stone and the interior foundations of the 1-story ell and bay window are constructed with more random coursed rubble. Mr. McDermet noted that the exterior facing on the south and east walls of the 2-story structure are granite veneer. There is no granite veneer on the 1-story ell or on the north wall of the 2-story structure. Mr. Kasparian asked for clarification of the Mormon Church connection to the property and stated that this is not addressed in the Museum's current exhibit or in the Boston Affiliates report. Mr. Grimes stated that there is evidence that a daughter of Brigham Young boarded in the building during the 1840's and that Young may have visited the property at that time. Research is still being conducted on this subject,including investigation of 19`h century census data. A written summary will be presented to the Commission. Mr. Kasparian stated that if the Museum intends to document and interpret the history of occupancy of the house and/or the significance in relation to early Mormon Church history, a corresponding record of material evidence in the structure and on the property should also be made. Mr. Grimes stated that the Museum has measured plan drawings of the house. The Museum will also document the house before,during and after demolition/ moving with photographs. The"before" photo documentation will begin during the week of June 19. �r June 7, 2000, Page 7 ' 2 River Street Richard Lueke submitted a request to amend his Certificate of Appropriateness dated 2/17/00 to allow for two windows instead of one per amended drawing submitted. Ms. Guinee made a motion to approve the amendment. Mr. Mangifesti seconded the motion, all were in favor and the motion so carried. 155 Derby Streeti Wharfside Condominium Trust submitted an application for a Certificate of Non-Applicability to repair clapboards and repaint in existing colors. Ms. Guy stated that the applicant also has an application in for the next meeting to alter the rear deck to bring the railings up to code. They would like approval to demolish the existing deck. Ms. Guinee made a motion to approve the application for clapboard repair, repainting and replacement of rear decks in kind with alterations to be reviewed at the next meeting. Mr. Mangifesti seconded the motion, all were in favor and the motion so carried. Other Business Ms. Guy stated that site isst:ed Ccrtiticsttes of Non-applicability for 15 Chestnut (reroofing), 162 Federal (various repairs), 359 Essex (repaint) and Salem Common(repaint fence). Ms. Guy stated that she provided letters of support for two MPPF projects for Old town Hall and Immaculate Conception. There being no further business, Ms. Guinee made a motion to adjourn. Mr. Mangifesti seconded the motion, all were in favor and the motion so carried. Respectfully submitted, Jane y Clerk the Commi sion June 7, 2000, Page 5 120-134 Essex Street • In continuation of a previous meeting,the Peabody Essex Museum submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to removal a garden fence from the interior of the property. Robert Monk represented the applicant. Mr. Monk provided copies of photographs from 1972 showing that the fence was not there. He stated that he believed it was installed between 1986 & 1989. Mr. Stevens made a motion to approve the fence removal. Mr. Desrocher seconded the motion, all were in favor and the motion so carried. 5 Federal Court Also in continuation of a previous meeting, the Peabody Essex Museum submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to relocate a gardener's shed from 2 New Liberty Street to 5 Federal Court/318 Essex St. Mr. Stevens stated that at the site visit, Mr. Karam had been enthusiastic about the style of the shed but felt that the placement set back from the street would be improved by painting it the color of the potter's shed. Mr. Stevens suggested a light brown stain. Mr. Monk stated that painting it would be no problem. Ms. Guinee made a motion to approve the application conditional that the shed be painted light brown to match to potting shed. Mr. Mangifesti seconded the motion, all were in favor and the motion so carried. 24 Winter Street Jeffrey and Ann Laaff presented an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to install a black louvered panel for furnace installation per application, photograph and details submitted. Mr. Stevens made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Ms. Guinee seconded the motion, all were in favor and the motion so carried. 18 Washineton Square West Three Corners Realty Trust submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to install a personal wireless service facility on the roof of the Hawthorne Hotel. The facility will consist of six panel antennas mounted to the fagade of the existing elevator penthouse and a base radio station in an alcove next to the penthouse. Photographs simulations were provided. Tom Murphy from Omnipoint represented the applicant. Mr. Murphy stated that he has met with the Salem Common Neighborhood Association. He stated that the antenna are 6' long and 1 brick deep. The panels are not real brick, but are mylar antennas over fiberglass. Wall construction will be with ''/z brick veneer wall. June 7, 2000, Page 6 Ms. Guinee asked how long the veneer will last. Mr. Murphy stated that he has not had any problems in • the two years in business. He stated that he would accept a condition that they will maintain the veneer if it should wears. Mr. Stevens made a motion to approve the application as submitted conditional that the mylar product be maintained to match the brick fagade. Ms. Guinee seconded the motion, all were in favor and the motion so carried. 180 Derby Street The Brookhouse Home for Aged Women submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to install a new 400 amp electrical service with meter on the side of the building. Richard Denis, electrician, represented the applicant and stated that the service change is on Orange Street of which the taller conduit of the two existing is being replaced. The State has mandated that the home installed air conditioning. Mr. Kasparian asked if the location where the wire hits the building will be the same. Mr.Denis stated that it can be the same. Mr. Kasparian suggested painting the conduit a dark color. Mr. Denis was concerned that it would alter the rating. . Mr. Kasparian asked the size of the meter. Mr. Denis stated that it was approximately 2' x 2 %2' wide by 4". Mr. Stevens asked if it could be put in the back of the house. Mr. Denis stated that it would be thousands of dollars more. Mr. Stevens stated that this is a prominent house and there is an opportunity to eliminate an eyesore. Members also expressed concern of the height of the meters at the sidewalk and the possibility for pedestrian injury. Mr. Stevens made a motion to approve a Certificate of Hardship to enlarge the conduit and for meters to remain in the interior of the building with the conduit to be painted to match the brick. Ms. Guinee seconded the motion, all were in favor and the motion so carried. 15 Federal Street Darleen Melis and Iry Ingraham submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to replace the kitchen shed roof with black shingles to match the main roof. A sample of the proposed roofing material was provided. Mr. Stevens made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Ms. Guinee seconded the motion, all were in favor and the motion so carried. c� June 7, 2000, Page 3 ` Staley McDermet, 30 Dearborn Street with an office at 175 Essex Street, stated that the proposal four . years ago was to demolish the houses. He urged the Commission not to approve the waiver tonight. He noted that Historic Salem, Inc. has no objection to the relocation of the buildings but had four concerns to highlight: • That there be mechanisms in place to ensure the long term preservation of the houses • That there be adequate lot size and siting for the houses in order to make them attractive to a potential buyer • That all significant historic fabric be retained • That the timing of the moving be done with assurance of adequate funds to complete the project. Mr. McDermet noted that the second and third concerns were the priorities. He suggested that Massachusetts Historical Commission(MHC) determine what is significant historic fabric. Mr. McDermet requested to postpone any waiver until the Commission can absorb the report, perform a site visit and determine what is significant. Mr. McDermet noted that the additions may have acquired significance in their own right even if they are not original. Mr. McDermet stated that the Museum still has more permits to obtain. He also noted that Salem has lost much of its 20' century commercial buildings and that the Empire building is an example of its period. He stated that if Salem does not preserve these examples, when this period becomes part of the past, we will be missing examples of this period. Mr. McDermet noted that he performed a study of the Empire building a few years ago for the City. Mr. McDermet stated that he is concerned that the Museum will change its mind like it did wit the Armory and not proceed as is being proposed. He suggested not waiving until all permits and financing are in place. City Councillor Joseph O'Keefe stated that he agreed with Mr. McDermet. He stated that the Museum's past statements have been disingenuous. Mr. Kasparian stated that he had grave concern about the nature of the agreements and the Museum's treatment of these agreements in the past. Mr. Kasparian asked if there was a Museum response to the concerns raised by Historic Salem, Inc. Mr. Grimes stated that the Museum responded in length and could provide the Commission with a copy. Mr. Grimes noted that the Museum has passed the $85 million mark and is working toward the $100 million goal. He noted that when they divested the Bulfrnch building, they put preservation easements in place which are monitored by Historic Salem, Inc. He stated that the Museum is leaning toward keeping the houses in Museum control. He stated that it will cost$6-800,000 to move the two buildings. He stated that there are some aspects that they need to move forward with. Mr. Kasparian asked the date of the rear addition and the significance of the rear addition in question. He stated that he needed time to read the report and requested that the Commission see the areas subject to demolition and moving. Mr. Goff stated that it was critical for the Commission to tour the buildings and to get an objective third party opinion (i.e. MHC). Atty. Correnti stated that they have been researching the houses for five years. He asked if the • Commission would consider waiving the Demolition Delay Ordinance tonight for the Empire building. He stated that it is 50 '/2 years old—just under the wire of the Ordinance. He noted that it is a critical component of the expansion and will be coming down. Atty. Correnti stated that a three month wait will be significant in terms of cost and timing impact. He noted that everything needs to be coordinated so as a June 7, 2000, Page 4 not to disrupt Haunted Happenings. Arty. Correnti noted that the ell of 42 Charter Street is not as • significant as 10 Liberty Street. He stated that the buildings cannot be demolished until they get Salem Redevelopment Authority approval,but that they can begin the preparations. He noted that the Museum chose not to file the waiver applications six months ago and let the time run without coming before the Commission. Arty. Correnti requested a vote on the Empire and 42 Charter Street with the condition that no actual demolition take place until all approvals are in hand(i.e. SRA). He stated that this will allow them to begin preparation but they will still not be able to demolish. Atty. Correnti stated that as representative of the Museum, he will waive the requirement that the Commission issue a preliminary finding on 10 Liberty Street in order for the Commission to continue the application. Mr. Kasparian stated that he was trying to grapple why the Museum needed the waiver if they still need other permits which could take three months. Tor Untne, the project director and architect, stated that he believed they will secure the permits in order to begin moving by September. Mr. Grimes stated that they need to sequence the tasks so that the proposed park is in place. Mr. Correnti noted that the pedestrian walkway is part of the agreement in getting Liberty Street. Mr. McDermet stated that the Museum has demonstrated that they could demolish a structure in 2 '/z weeks and that the City should not be lulled into a false sense of security that the SRA or someone else • will look after this. Mr. Kasparian stated that there was not an awful lot to gain in extending the delay for the Empire building,but that he would still like a site visit. Mr. Stevens made a motion to continue 10 Liberty Street pending a site visit and the waiver of the 30 day preliminary report requirement by the Museum. Ms. Guinee seconded the motion, all were in favor and the motion so carried. Mr. Desrocher made a motion to approve the waiver of 133 Essex Street conditional that no demolition begin until receipt of SRA approval. Mr. Mangifesti seconded the motion. Messrs. Stevens, Mangifesti and Desrocher voted in favor. Mr. Kasparian and Ms. Guinee voted in opposition. The motion did not carry. Mr. Correnti stated that he would waive the 30 day preliminary report requirement for 42 Charter Street and the Empire building. Mr. Mangifesti made a motion to continue 42 Charter Street pending a site visit and the waiver of the 30 day preliminary report requirement by the Museum. Ms. Guinee seconded the motion, all were in favor and the motion so carried. Mr. Mangifesti made a motion to continue 133 Essex Street pending a site visit and the waiver of the 30 • day preliminary report requirement by the Museum. Mr. Desrocher seconded the motion, all were in favor and the motion so carried. A site visit was scheduled for Saturday, June 10, 2000 beginning at the Empire building. June 7, 2000, Page 1 SALEM HISTORICAL COMMISSION • MINUTES June 7, 2000 A regular meeting of the Salem Historical Commission was held on Wednesday, June 7, 2000 at 7:30 p.m. at One Salem Green, Salem, MA. Present were Chairman Kasparian, Messrs. Stevens, Mangifesti and Desrocher and Ms. Guinee and Ms. Guy. 42 Charter Street, 10 Liberty Street& 133 Essex Street In continuance of a previous meeting, the Peabody Essex Museum submitted applications to waive the Demolition Delay Ordinance to demolish the one story section located in the rear of 10 Liberty Street,to demolish the three story section located in the rear of 42 Charter Street and for total demolition of 133 Essex Street. Mr. Kasparian read a letter from Mayor Usovicz urging that the Commission support the waiver requests. Joseph Correnti, attorney for the Museum, stated that three separate applications have been submitted, but that all were part of the Museum's expansion plan. Mr. Kasparian asked the date of the original demolition permit application. Atty. Correnti replied that it is dated March 31, 2000. He stated that the proposed plan includes moving the two houses a couple of hundred feet on Charter Street and to recreate the Charter Street streetscape. John Grimes of the Museum provided a PowerPoint presentation on the proposal. He stated that the expansion plan required the full footprint currently occupied by the houses. The Empire building removal is needed to create the pedestrian walkway. He noted that they have studied alternatives for more than five years. The proposal will preserve the houses and provide for adaptive reuse. It will revive the lost residential character of Charter Street. Mr. Grimes noted that the demolition delay will cause financial and logistical hardship and that the buildings will be difficult to move with the additions. Mr. Grimes stated that they hired Boston Affiliates to do an assessment of the architectural significance of the two houses. Mr. Grimes stated that 10 Liberty Street is a cl841 Greek Revival building built by John Kinsman. It was updated in the Italianate style after the 1866 fire. The rear has a one story service addition. There is little detailing inside the addition which is two rooms and a bathroom. He stated that 42 Charter Street is a cl805 Federal building built by innkeeper Gilbert Chadwich. It was also updated in the Italianate style after the 1866 fire. The rear three story addition is one side brick and the remaining sides wood. The additions are not prominent from the street. Mr. Grimes stated that both buildings have architectural and local significance. They are part of the residential area in close proximity to Salem's commercial core. Mr. Grimes stated that the Empire building is a c1949 commercial building whose interior has been frequently remodeled. • Mr. Grimes discussed the preservation efforts undertaken by-the Museum including: • Study and planning • Moving costs (i.e. engineering analysis, Request for Proposals and interview of candidates) It was June 7, 2000, Page 2 noted that there are a limited number of contractors that will move brick. • • Documentation (photography, survey, archiving of samples and fragments) Additional costs will include site preparation, logistics and the actual move. Mr. Grimes stated that the Empire signs will be preserved. The two houses are being moved to where there were two houses located in the 1870's. The granite foundation will move as well. They are still determining how to adaptively reuse the building. Mr. Grimes stated that they will provide permanent markers around the houses to commemorate the history of the houses and the people who lived there. They will be creating a website that will document the move and the buildings' histories. They will . ... ....... integrate the houses with the Women's Heritage Trail. Mr. Grimes noted that moving and preserving houses is a tradition in Salem and noted that this was done with the Crowninshield-Bentley House. Mr. Stevens asked the condition of the interior walls that will be exposed when the additions are removed. Mr. Grimes stated that they have not opened the wall to 42 Charter Street yet but will restore it to what is architecturally appropriate to the house and to the weather. Mr. Grimes stated that 10 Liberty will be infilled to match existing. He noted that most of the wall is open to the weather now. Mr. Kasparian asked what will happen to the fences, granite posts and brick paving. Mr. Grimes stated that the landscape around the houses has not been fully developed as yet. He noted that they will need to go through site plan review and Design Review Board. He stated that they will consider incorporating as much as is practical but will preserve what is appropriate to be preserved. Both houses will be • photographed as they are now before demolition begins. Mr. Grimes noted that they are limited as to what can be done with the side yard due to the Salem Housing Authority deeded parking and an existing parking easement. Mr. Kasparian encouraged maintenance of the relationships of the sideyards to the houses. Mr. Kasparian asked the relationship of the houses to the Mormon Church. Mr. Grimes stated that 10 Liberty Street is associated with the Felt family and this will be interpreted on the website and with markers. Mr. Kasparian asked the date of the additions. Mr. Grimes stated that they are not original to the house and assumed that they were built following the 1866 fire. Mr. Kasparian asked if the addition is associated with the Mormons. Mr. Grimes stated that it is unlikely. John Goff, preservation consultant, stated that he assisted with the 1995 Boston Affiliates report. He thanked the Museum for agreeing to preserve the houses and having the existing Mormon exhibit. He noted that the 1995 study never stated that the rear ell s were insignificant or that they were additions. Mr. Goff stated that the study team was not let into 10 Liberty Street and that all findings were based on exterior study. Mr. Goff stated that he believed that the rear ell of 10 Liberty Street is 1842 and noted that the 6 over 6 windows and the interior stair is Federal. He stated that the Mormons believe that Brigham Young lived in the house at one time. He urged the Commission to spend a little more time to asses the rear additions. He stated that if the rear ell of 10 Liberty Street was determined to be significant, it would not be difficult to move the tiny ell to the new location. City of Salem Planning Department One Salem, MA 01970 978 745-9595, Ext. 311 Fax 978 , . , . Memo To: Peabody Museum Go Atty. Joe Correnti; Planni� ng Boa Salem Redevelopment Authority& Historic Salem, Inc. From: Jane A. Guy,Assistant Community Development Director Date: August 16,2000 Re: Meeting minutes Enclosed please find the three sets of approved meeting minutes that pertain to the approval of the Waiver of Demolition Delay application for the Peabody Museum. • Page 1 ��c� . � cXJ