Loading...
64-86 - 29 CONGRESS STREET - CONSERVATION COMMISSION (002) an ' I J 1 Form - - DEQE File No. 64-86 (To be provided by DEOE) SALEM Commonwealth Cityrrown •of Massachusetts Applicant Shetland Properties Certificate of Compliance Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act, G.L. c. 131, §40 From Salem Conservation Commission issuing Authority TO Shetland Properties 29 Conaress Street, Salem (Name) (Address) Date of Issuance Dec. 13 1984 This Certificate is issued for work regulated by an Order of Conditions:issued to Shetland Properties dated 11-29-82 and issued by the Conservation Commission 1. U It is hereby certified that the work regulated by the above-referenced Order of Conditions has been satisfactorily completed. 2. ❑ It is hereby certified that only the following portions of the work regulated by the above-refer- enced Order of Conditions have been satisfactorily completed:(If the Certificate of Compliance does not include the entire project,specify what portions are included.) 3. ❑ It is hereby certified that the work regulated by the above-referenced Order of Conditions was never commenced.The Order of Conditions has lapsed and is therefore no longer valid.No future work subject to regulation under the Act maybe commenced without filing anew Notice of Intent and receiving a new Order of Conditions. ..........................................................................................................................................._...._..................................... (Leave Space Blank) 8-1 i 4. ❑ This certificate shall be recorded in the Registry of Deeds or the Land Court for the district in which the land is located.The Order was originally recorded on (date) at the Registry of Book ,Page 5. ❑ The following conditions of.the Order shall continue:(Set forth any conditions contained in the Final Order,such as maintenance or monitoring,which are to continue for a longer period.) SALEM CONSERVATION COMMISSION Issued by Signature(s) _ When issued by the Conservation Commision this Certificate must be signed by a majority of is members. On this 13th day of December 19 84 before me personally appeared the above-named to me known to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she executed the same,a5 his/her free act and.deed. 9-9-88 Nota y Public My commission expires Detach on dotted line and submit to the Conservation Commission To Issuing Authority Please be advised that the Certificate of Compliance for the project at File Number !has been recorded at the Registry of and has been noted in the chain of title of the affected property on ' 19- If tgIf recorded land,the instrument number which identifies this transaction is If registered land,the document number which identifies this transaction is ` Signature - Applicant \ 82 SHETLAND PROPERTIES ® 'SHETLAND PROPERTIES/ANDOVER 'SHETLAND PROPERTIES of CHICAGO,INC. Telephone: 'SHETLAND PROPERTIES of ILLINOIS,INC. (617)475760(Andover,Line) 'SHETLAND PROPERTIES of INDIANA,INC. (617)289-2506(Boston Line) RUTHERFORD ROAD REALTY LIMITED (312)738-3121 (Chicago Line) MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 986, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 (617) 744-0556(Salem Line)(800)225-6826(Toll Free) December 10, 1984 Mr. Philip D. Moran, Chairman City of Salem Conservation Commission 1 Salem Green Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Re: File No. 64-86, Order of Conditions Dear Mr. Moran and Members: Regarding the Order of Conditions issued by the Con-mission ori November 29, 1982, and extended on March 22, 1984, the undersigned applicant hereby certifies that the work has been completed in accordance with said Order, and hereby requests that a Certificate of Compliance be issued stating that the work has been satisfactorily completed. We are advised that this matter will be considered at your December 13, 1984 meeting at which Peter Kronenberg, Property Manager of Shetland Properties will attend. Very truly yours, SHETLAND PROPERTIES Bruce A. Erikson Executive Vice President Jm 'A subsidiary of SHETLAND PROPERTIES,operating millions of square feet of industrial space In the United States and Canada. SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS.•ANDOVER,MASSACHUSETTS•CHICAGO,ILLINOIS•SOUTH BEND,INDIANA•BRAMPTON(TORONTO)ONTARIO,CANADA SHETLAND HARBOR TRUST BUILDING PROJECT SCOPE Building Development Phase I: renovation of 12,800 sq. ft. to office space on second floor of building. Project includes: Installation of atrium lobby extending from first floor to fifth approximately 321x261 ; removal of 30 brick infill panels on west elevation and 40 brick infill panels on north elevation; installation of bronzed-glass. segmented windows in all panels of west elevation and 8 panels on 2nd .floor - north elevation. Project completion date: 12/31/82 Building Development Phase II: Removal of remaining 110 brick infill panels on north elevation. Installation of' bronzed-glass windows. Project completion date: May 1984. Removal of brick infill panels requires temporary location of 438 cubic yards of brisk material on tidal flat, property of which owned by Shetland Properties. Material to be located from Phase I development Dec. 1982 through Phase II. Brick material. to be removed from tidal flat no later than May 1 , 1984. Removal of brick panel, subsequent locating of brick material on tidal flat will be halted May 1983 and resumed in fall of 1983 to project completion in allowance of boating activity in South River channel during period. Marina Development: In conjunction with dredging of tidal flat,removal of the brick infill material will also be completed in accordance with previously approved plans and specifications for marina development. Temporary locating of brick infill material'. will be within 12' of building foundation, 38' from channel edge. Location of brick material on tidal flat adjacent to building to be marked and posted as notice to channel activity. P r l GULF OF MAINE RESEARCH CENTER INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SERVICES 30 CHURCH STREET SALEM, MA 01970 (617)745-6618 November 12 , 1985 Attorney Philip Moran, Chairman Salem Conservation Commission One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Dear Attorney Moran and Commission Members : Enclosed please find a copy of the "Ecological Evaluation of Proposed Oceanic Discharge of Dredged Material from Salem Harbor, Massachusetts , " prepared by ERC Inc. for the Army Corps of Engineers . At' the end of the report are the results of the sediment analyses for the proposed dredging site at Shetland Industrial Park which you requested. Exploration No. PE-3 (page 3 of the sediment sample test results) was taken at Station A (Figure 1, inset) , the proposed dredging site. Please note in the Introduction of the report that the dredged material from Salem Harbor complies with S. 227. 5 (Prohibited Materials) of the ocean dumping regulations and also complies with toxicological criteria noted in S. 227.6 . If you have any further questions regarding this matter, please contact me at your convenience. Sincerely, AK: jm Anne Kasprzyk Research Associate Enclosure Form 7 CDEOERIONo. (Tobeprovkfedby0E0E) Commonwealth - cityrrown Salem of Massachusetts Shetland Properties - .Applicant Extension Permit ^" ~ 3 •• Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act ='.,�';.•• ;,;,; •. G.L. c. 131, §40 ' c r\ From: SALEM CONSERVATION COMMISSION 1, f •' :'.� �su ,g Autf,ocrty To: Shetland Properties 29 Congress Street r. •....... .. (Name). (Address) "min , . . . The Order of Conditions(or Extension Permit)issued on March 22, 1984 (date) t0 Shetland Properties (name)forworkat 29 Congress Street, Salem (address)is hereby extended for a period of—2_mos- xs}from the date it expires. This Extension Permit will expire on December > 1, 1984 (date) This document shall be recorded in accordance with General Condition 8 of the Order of Conditiorm J .......................................................................•-............................ _____ (Leave Space Blank) - - 7-1 Issued by SALEM CONSERVATION COMMISSION Signature(s) t Wh-n ts'sued by the Conservation Commission this Extension Permit rtrust be signed by a majority of its ? �rtesibt}rs O t�l+ts 22 --ay of March 19 84 beforeme peisgrlally appeared—fho to me known to be the rson described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she executed the same'as his/her free act and deed. 9-9-88 Notary Public My commission expires SALEM CONSERVATION COMMISSION - ' Detach on dotted line and submit to the . prior to eommaneameni or vrorfr_ To IsstWV Authority Please be advised that the Extension Permit to the Order of Conditions for the projectat File Number - has been recorded at the Registry of has been noted in the chain of title of the affected property in accordance with General Condition 8 of the origins{order of conditions on 19 If recorded land,the instrument number which identities this transaction is It registered land,the document number which identifies this transaction is f Signature ADpticant - 7-2 . , SHETLAND PROPERTIES 'SHETLAND PROPERTIES/ANDOVER + ' 'SHETLAND PROPERTIES of CHICAGO INC. _ Telephone: A 'SHETLAND PROPERTIES of ILLINOIS INC. - (617)47"760(Andover,Line) ® 'SHETLAND PROPERTIES of INDIANA,INC. (617)289-2506(Boston Line) RUTHERFORD ROAD REALTY LIMITED (312)738-3121 (ChIC890 Line) (617) 744.0556(Salem Line) MAILING.ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 986,SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970 + - ..- _ (600)225-6626(Toe Free) r February ,17 , 19,94 Department of thc_Army ` New England Division„ Corps of Engineers d 424 Trapelo Road . Waltham, Massachusetts 02254 Attention: Ms . Karen Kirk Adams Dear Ms. Adams: Following our conaersation February 10 , 1984 and your request for further information, this letter will provide you with additional details regarding Army Permit number rk MA-SALE-83-040 . F .. 1 Shetland Propertles ' plans for the development of a marina '-: adjacent to its buildings required dredging according to previously approved plans and specifications. Int was anticipated late in 1982' and early 1983 that this project would begin in 1984 . Shetland Properties Building Development ''Phase II , which included removaf.6f 110 brick infill panels in 'its building in. preparation for inrstallation ,of new windows, required the temporary location of brick material on .the tidal flat, property of. which is owned by Shetland- Properties and adjacent to its building. It was expected that `•the removal of the brick material would occur in conjunction with plansfordredging required for the marina development in 1984 , having to engage 'dredging equipment and incur- related expenses once rather than twice. Shetland Proper' es is not prepared at this time to proceed with the marina development and associated dredging. Shetland Properties Phase II Building Development plans were significantly modif:Led due'to delay in materials shipping, project scheduling, and financial considerations, ost onin P P g Shetland Properties overall plans and impacting the timing of our to next base anticipated d the marina P P development. In addition, Shetland Properties is in the process of applying for an expansion of the existing Commercial Area Revitalization I) L: rrict-(CARD) in an effort to procure an Industrial Revenue Bond to finance the marina development. 'A subsidiary of SHETLAND PROPERTIES,operating millions of square feel of industrial space In the United Steles and Canada. - SALEM.MASSACHUSETTS-,ANDOVER.MASSACHUSETTS•CHICAGO.ILLINOIS•SOUTH BEND,INDIANA•BRAMPTON(TORONTO)ONTARIO.CANADA L '► Department of the Army February 17 , 1984 Page 2 This process is taking considerably longer than originally anticipated. �jTherefore, while Shetland Properties continues to address he feasibility of the marina development, Shetland Properties requests a one year extension of its requirement to remove the brick material currently situated adjacent to its building on the tidal flats . Very truly yours, SHETLAND PROPERTIES ' Peter Kronenberg Property Manager jm CC. City of Salem Mr. Richard McIntosh, Building Inspector Salem Conservation Commission Department of Environmental Quality Engineering Division of Waterways Mr. James Cahill Salem Harbormaster Jean Guy Martineau, City Councilor Waterways Advisory Board fit • e • r Demon Commission _. f� Suleen. Massachusetts 01370 November 29 , 1982 Mr. Bruce Erikson Shetland Properties 29 Congress Street . Salem, MA. 01970 Dear Mr. Erikson: Enclosed please find the original Order of Conditions as issued by the Salem Conservation Commission this evening. You are reminded that this Order must be filed at the Registry of Deeds and there is a ten-day appeal period. Sincerely yours, Dale E. Yale Clerk dey Enclosure • FORM 4 { , ORDER OF CONDITIONS WETLAND S PROTECTION ACT G.L. C. 131, s. 40 ---------------------------------------------------------------- CITY/TOWN Salem, �Q?L • FILE NUMBER 64-86 - - TO: NAME Shetland Properties ADDRESS 29 Congress Street CERTIFIED MAIL NUMBER PROJECT LOCATION: Address 29 Congress Street Recorded at Registry of S . Essex Book 5532, Page Certificate (if registered) 38285 REGARDING: Notice of Intent dated November 24, 1982 and plans titled and dated Plan Accompanying Petition of Shetland Properties--Proposed 'Marina and Dredging on S . side of South THIS ORDER IS ISSUED ON (date) November 29, 1982 River Rev. 4-1-81 ----------------------------------------------------=-------------- Pursuant to the authority of c. 131, s. 40, the Salem _ Conservation Commission - has reviewed your Notice of Intent and plans identified above, and has determined that the area on which the proposed work is to be done is significant to one or more of the interests listed in G.L. c. 131, s. .40. The Salem Conservation Comm. hereby orders-.that the following conditions are necessary to protect said interests and all work shall be performed in strict accordance with them and with the Notice of Intent and plans identified above except where such plans are modified by said conditions. --------------------------------------------------------------------- CONDITIONS - 1. Failure to comply with all conditions stated herein, and with all related statutes and other regulatory measures, shill be deemed cause to revoke or modify this order. a -1- FORM 4 ORDER OF CONDITIONS CONTINUED FILE NUMBER 64-86 2. This order does not grant any property rights or any exclu- sive privileges; it does not authorize any injury to private property or invasion of private rights. 3. This order does not relieve the permittee or any other per- son of the necessity of complying with all other applicable federal, state or local statutes; , ordinances, by-laws and/ or regulations. 4. The work authorized hereunder shall be completed within one (1) year from the date of this order unless it is for a maintenance dredging project subject to Section 5(9) . The - - order may be extended by the issuing authority for one or more additional one-year periods upon application to the said issuing authority at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date of the order or its extension. 5. Any fill used in connection with this project shall be clean fill, containing no trash, refuse, rubbish or debris, includ- ing, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, lumber, bricks, plaster, wire, lath, paper, cardboard, pipe, tires, ashes, refrigerators, motor vehicles or parts of any of the foregoing. 6. No work may be commenced untill all appeal periods have r _. elapsed from .the order of the Conservation Commission or from a final order by the Department of Environmental Quality Engineering. y. No work shall be undertaken until the final order, with respect to the proposed project, has been recordedinthe Registry of Deeds for the district in which the land is located within the chain of title of the affected property. The Document number indicating such recording shall be sub- mitted on the form at the end of this order to the issuer of this:order prior .to commencement of work. 8. A sign shall be displayed at the site not less than two square feet or more than three square feet bearing the words, "Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering, Number 64-86 " 9. Where the Department of Environmental Quality Engineering is requested to make a determination and to issue a super- seding order, the Conservation Commission shall be a party to all agency proceedings and hearings before the Depart- ment. ' ORDER OF CONDITIONS CONTINUED FILE NO. 64-86 10. Upon completion of the work described herein, the applicant shall forthwith request, in writing, that a Certificate of Compliance be issued stating that the work has been satis-� factorily completed. ll. 'rhe work shall conform to the following described plans and additional conditions. a) All work shall conform to the plan entitled, "Plan Accompanying Petition of-,-Shetland Properties , 29 Congress Street, Salem, MA . Proposed 7.1arina and _,; '', Dredging on South Side of South River Eas of .Congress Street Bridge" dated Mlay, 1980 , revised ;•„�� pril 1, 1981 , prepared by Sasaki Associates , Water- - [town, TrA . - 3' "The removal of brick infill panels shall be completed lay 1, 1984. by c) I£ the project is stopped for any reason other than normal construction scheduling, commencement of removal of brick from the mudflat will be within thirty (30) days . d) Any obstruction posing a navigational hazard as determined by the Harbormaster and the Salem Con- servation Commission of the South River Channel as a result of this project shall be removed within fourteen (14) days . e ) A written work schedule shall be submitted to the Con- servation Commission within ten days of .receipt of this Order of Conditions . l -3- ORDERS OF CONDITIOPIS - continued � � The applicant, any person aggrieved by this order, any owner' - oF land abutting the land upon which the proposed work is 6o be 'done, or any ten residents of the city or town in which such-land is located, are hereby notified of their right to appeal this order to the Department of Environmental Quality Engineering provided the request is made in writing and by certified mail to the Department within ten (10) days from the issuance of this order. SALEM CONS; RVATION / - ISSUED BY COMMISS$ODIY. rW9s, On this 29th day of November 1982, before me personally appeared . the above-named persons "" to me known to be the person described in, and who executed, the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he executed the same as his free act and deed. ��'`-� "( •��- My Commission expires 9-9-88 DETACH ON DOTTED LINE AND SUBMIT TO THE ISSUER. OF THIS ORDER PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. TO - - __- (Issuing Authority) PLEASE BE-ADVISED- HAT THE ORDER OF CONDITIONS FOR THE PROJECT AT FILE NUMBER _ , HAS BEEN RECORDED AT THE REGISTRY OF ON (DATE) If recorded land, the instrument number which identifies this trans- action is ,If registered land, the document .number which identifies this trans- action is signed Applicant -4- 2 )iDREDGING SITE '.ViN [LPIV I! "/' .• < ry.Q 9 / lr.. -.21� -'_�' , ._ N !:' _2 � I< 7,21'/ D 2 "1 n.a; • r!.tr/ �i IvC c.�=i:. 9 .,21 !• Q � � �. '�jG 55 li 27g fe 9 20 X4 9 'g :.) Z` -.( S,W ..Vad `♦����� a:. w� a ::T �4 "z7... 5 7. '9. 5 b�e p c 22 /.j ^(�J`li Goy`' 1 'j� - `•i �e,� 1 9 16 �% 7 .17 (fes at ^�I ♦ '! \\ \�\/�� - {1 /y�lurmal• Cal C u vl...:.. 1., h']J m 'Co. (• 0 19,4 D" 1 ��� ,� Q 1 '2. xaaa. SALEMO ` I r�^LVr ffff CN ,TOW[PI nA W x ;czi 9" Pickering Wharf ^.orc tt.. regi '.6•Ft Anchorage Area \';it !�' ` 2.SA L E'f 2 STATION A _ ^White Nun "A"Buoy ..7 \�✓ III • � i1 :1 J li.p`C ]n ns,..�jd RBO.R 21 6-Ft Channel U r�^�]`�� a@: \ STATION C q, -J 6i�-j•l. .iu.( iri......wn f� ......., STATION 2 Derby Wharf ��� � I\ \ 11 OPalin..Corr '" 5 a ' t� f I unlP.s v�"' J 7 a'u 8-Ft Channel \� G If R -f 2 < I�;19u1h $wLleffo - �.�-�"s• `/ 5 \ y` II2cJ `i<_,F;( ® SALEM HARBOR P SI V\.. 2 N ti '`I I /. �_J •I pl 2 :�! % NOT TO SCALE v DISPOSAL SITE ' -7 _ 212 A 2140 If � 267 !16 / IHS w 252 ; N 25e 24e � lel -•�- / / < ! NOT TO SCALE i. _ 770 ^.3ae_—. _.—` 69 - / 155 2711 % , /21 278 e i \ 2190_ �,I /279 I i A 6 !% j D.a.f r•'I6t9e] STATION eJ . l,ne.,mr:w,wf2 S • •� ! • j NI 20p- �\ -!l....S) 7kRrnf l.�rw.ry ell \ `/ �. 299 /' A J r� ` 291 \\ 2a / h 252 - 2 111 astesJ -- 2as \ SJ —� 27 261 !2210 ��2r' SU Vey of 19 ' _ 251 \�� 275 290 1:11 1,11 nr� 77 2 . � !n�` z2o� a „\ `. 2 276 2J0 r 292 . 1 Figure 1.—Locations of proposed dredging and disposal sites. Sampling stations .for sediment are depicted in insets. —2— L OItICiLNTAL 140.-.. (ratty of M ' y MiTirr of 3noprartr of 'Nuilaings tl S hr. r City Hall - L 3 19t�1/ ~ Permission is hereby given to ..- _.. . ... .... -- ---------- .... .. .. . ----- r �r - - - -- _ -._ /-I, 1� .... . .__- -_-.-.--. ---__---_ i _- .- --�j� ..r .-_ .___. - .. - - - _. f - _------- -..-- --_.- r i at No. Y -- p � _ Street,Ward Yt' } > ; in accordance with an ap cation on file in this office and subject to the provi- sions of the ordinances and statutes in relation to the Inspector and Construction of Buildings in the City of Salem. �� r F Paid /vim ". Permit Fee ai -- --- -------------------- -- ----- - -- -- - P Inrperror- of Buildings x P23 8C � x ' r d_ z. Y _ _ t - 0 Y r M1 ! i-k f T � SY iR4. r rd.a x`_ / ! + t"y A.` � � 4• r '�ta�C sx ..0 ..x��'4�rK kv -_•st ".� �..:�' , ..>: 4 '. r. �M �'. t.J n.,✓y.-"^?i4';:':"�W 4�'z.'�i "L._`C._':.� .'�:'�`�;''�''�:.."�,*32' _ .._,...�� -- .r.-s . _. -, �tnxi r SHETLAND PROPERTIES 'SHETLAND PROPERTIES/ANDOV2A 'SHETLAND PROPERTIES of CHICAGO,INC. Telephone: 'SHETLAND PROPERTIES of ILLINOIS,INC. (617)475-6760(Andover,Line) 'SHETLAND PROPERTIES of INDIANA, INC. (617) 289-2506(Boston Line) RUTHERFORD ROAD REALTY LIMITED (312)736-3121 (Chicago Line) MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 986, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 (617) 744-0556(Salem Line) (860)225-6826(Toll Free) January 10 , 1984 Mr. Joe MacDonough Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Branch 424 Trapelo Road Waltham, Massachusetts 02254 Dear Mr. McDonough: Thank you. for your time on January 3 , 1984 .. i Following our conversation, this letter will provide you t with information per your request regarding the modification of our plans for the development. of the Shetland Harbor Trust Building as it relates to the placement of brick material on the adjacent mudflats . Please refer to NEDOD-R- rt 24-83-074 and Department of the Army Permission number MA-SALE- 83-040 (LOP ) , City of. Salem Office of Inspector of Buildings Permit Number 423 , Salem Conservation Commission Order of Conditions File Number 64-86, Department of Environmental Quality Engineering, Division of Waterways File Number 83W- 001Permit Number 109, Water Quality Certification-waterways File Certification-Wat Number 83W-001D. , On November 22 , 1983 , I met with Salem Harbormaster Mr. James Cahill to discuss theeneral sta 9 tusr project and more particularly our of our ick material which is presently being plans the intertidal to tidal zone of the Sout:: River. Mr. Cahill expressed his appreciation of our efforts to insure safe navigation in the South River which included float markers to indicate project work area, posting of DEQE sign identifying project, relocating brick material as close as possible to the building in a neat manner and consistently removing project related debris, and, in general, keeping the Harbormaster informed of our project schedule on a regular basis. Mr. Cahill explained that in his opinion the integrity of the tidal flats had been maintained, no navigational hazard had occurred or is likely to occur, and expecting that Shetland Properties development . plans might have to be modified to postpone or not include the removal of the brick material., agreed that the integrity of the tidal flats 'A subsidiary of SHETLAND PROPERTIES,operating millions of square feet of industrial sPacs In the United Slates and Canada. SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS•ANDOVER,MASSACHUSETTS•CHICAGO,ILLINOIS•yGUTH BEND,INDIANA•BRAMPTON(TORONTO)ONTARIO.CANADA January 10 , 1984 Page two would not be compromised if this material remained as it is presently situated . Shetland Properties hereby requests your approval to modify previous plans for the removal of brick material from the tidal flats on its property adjacent to Shetland Harbor Trust Building. It is our considered opinion that as this material is presently situated it does not pose a threat to the integrity,of the intertidal zone and may even offer added stability to this area . Furthermore, no navigational hazard due to the storing of brick material has occurred from the inception of this project to date and the possibility of a future problem is this regard is nill . Therefore, Shetland Properties requests a modification in the project plan to now include the temporary storage of this material beyond May 1 , 1984 , which storage of material shall continue until the marina expansion project begins as in accordance with "Proposed Marina and Dredging" dated "July 10 , 1980, " Department of the Army Permit Number MA-SALE-81 -328 , Application Number 24-80-411 . Shetland Properties appreciates your continued support and, at this juncture, your prompt review of this request. Please contact me at your convenience if I can provide any needed information to facilitate your processes . Thank you. Very truly yours, SHETLAND PROPERTIES Peter W. Kronenberg Property Manager jm cc . City of Salem r. Richard McIntosh, Building Inspector Salem Conservation Commission Department of Environmental Quality Engineering Division of Waterways Mr. James Cahill Salem Harbormaster Jean Guy Martineau, City Councilor Waterways Advisory Board CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS PLANNING DEPARTMENT rq�cwvizt'b W.GREGORY SENKO a ONE SALEM GREEN CITY PLANNER e� $p' 01970 (617)744-4560 '4ec�va' March 8, 1984 Mr. Philip D. Moran, Chairman Salem Conservation Commission One Salem Green Salem, MA. 01970 Dear Mr. Moran: This letter is to inform you that the Planning Department is pursuing Shetland Industrial's request to extend the present CARD (commercial area revitalization district) to include the wharf area surrounding Shetland Industrial Park. The Planning Department has made initial inquiries to the Massachusetts Executive Office of Communities and Development for their review of the po- tential CARD extension. This is the first step in the CARD extension ap- proval process. We are anticipating the EOCD will do an inspection of the proposed extension area and give their approval of the potential CARD district within the next three to four weeks.. We will keep you informed of the progress in this area. If there is any further information I can provide regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely yours, Beve�Beverly �a'��9�✓'�, Y 4 Acting Assistant Planning Director BES:dey cc Peter Kronenberg, Property Manager,- Shetland Properties SHETLAND PROPERTIES ® 'SHETLAND PROPERTIES/ANDOVER 'SHETLAND PROPERTIES of CHICAGO,INC. Telephone: 'SHETLAND PROPERTIES of ILLINOIS,INC. (617)475-6760(Andover,Line) 'SHETLAND PROPERTIES of INDIANA,INC. (617) 289-25D6(Boston Line) RUTHERFORD ROAD REALTY LIMITED (312)738-3121 (Chicago Line) (617) 744-0556(Salem Line) MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 986, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 (800)225.6826(Toll Free) January 24 , 1984 Salem Conservation Commission One Salem Green Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Gentlemen: Re: Salem Conservation Commission Order of Conditions File #64-86 Shetland Properties respectfully requests a one year extension beyond May 1 , 1984 , the designated date whereby brick material located on the South River intertidal zone was to be removed. ( See letter to Army Corps of Engineers ) Thank you in advance for your prompt consideration and support. Very truly yours, SHETLAND PROPERTIES Peter Kronenberg Property Manager enc . jm 'A subsidiary of SHETLAND PROPERTIES,operating millions of square feet of industrial space in the United States and Canada. SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS•ANDOVER,MASSACHUSETTS•CHICAGO,ILLINOIS•SOUTH BEND,INDIANA•BRAMPTON(TORONTO)ONTARIO,CANADA m -k, � a c ? Caxecccli rye ecce a� �i sixa�vmenCal.� vra �4� �r. �eficvrGirePnC aP c�'�v�:ira-.�m�ntaC )�,�� - ANTHONY D.CORTESE,Se.-D: �7{ �,'i• Commissioner - UIvL'fQfoJt � . $ltvcE `e R��csoq ONE Xim." �CreeC, �oGCon7SALEL�OP`LA�� �[ F — z 9 Cp>J�R�Ss 5�2 r Sc+eTuallo e ,>_ C) I SacEwi VI/lati. Sourt162.��ZyG DEP". I b�9Z0 Sa� : Stofc 6ruue wwr�ve.ir�e o u Tt Dw� This will acknowledge receipt of your Notice of Intent to• perform work sub- ject to Chapter 131, Section 40, of the General Laws (ammended by Ch. 818, Acts of 1974) . From your plan, Notice of Intent and this Division' s investigation, it has been determined: Additional information. will be required before a proper determination can be made. Submit a sub-sketch on a small scale showing the general loca- tion of the proposed work, names of . the pond or stream and roads in the area etc. , in order that we can. properly orient the location of the project. A U.S. Geological Map is ideal for this purpose. A license will not be required at this time under the provisions of Chapter 917of the General Laws , however, a permit may be necessary from the local Conservation Commission subject to Ch. 131, S . 40 ; also, if a U. S . Army Corps of Engineers Permit is required, the, applicant MUST apply to the Division of Water Pollution Control for a Water Quality Certificate. p� T � A � will be .required at this time under the provisions of Chapter 91 of the General Laws . Enclosed are rules and regulation for filing under said provisions . All work shall be subject to all other related provision of law, by-laws , ordinances and regulations that may pertain. Ve t '- our G R�J . Hannon, P.E. Engineer - CC: Conservation Commission DEQE Region 9- Division of Water Pollution Control United State Army Corps of Engineers "^^�cE` EoJc�ost9 � TtvtJ quq Wetlands File No. S7W. �,4-86 SuewiiZ- �vs►J sliow �u 9tvnc►� swtJs. , THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ENGINEERING METROPOLITAN BOSTON-NORTHEAST REGION 323 New Boston Street, Woburn, MA 01801 Telephone No. 935-2160 R€CCI'J�:D U DATE: December 3, 1982 SALEM PLANNING DEPT. TOWN: Salem ASSIGNED FILE N0. 64-86 The Division of Wetlands is in receipt of an application filed under M.G.L. Chapter 131, Section 40, the application is in the name of: APPLICANT• Shetland Properties 29 Congress Street Salem, MA 01970 OWNER OF_LAND: Same as above PROJECT LOCATION• 29 Congress Street PROJECT REVIEW ( ) The application 1s incomplete. No File Number will be assigned until material checked below is submitted to this office: ( ) Notice of Intent and Environmental Data Form O Plans ( ) Locus WATERWAYS REVIEW ()Q Project may require a Chapter 91 License - Project has been referred to Waterways. ( ) Project does not require a Chapter 91 License. Issuance of a File Number indicates only completeness of the filing submitted, not approval of the application. Very truly yours, William J. St. Hilaire, P.E. CC: WSW/mes Regional Environmental Engineer SHETLAND PROPERTIES ^ .'SHETLAND PROPERTIES/ANDOVER ItIC```►�`", 'SHETLAND PROPERTIES of CHICAGO,INC. Telephone: 'SHETLAND PROPERTIES 01 ILLINOIS.INC. 'SHETLAND PROPERTIES of INDIANA,INC. (617)475-0760(Andover,Line) - RUTHERFORD ROAD REALTY LIMITED [6 17)288-2506 iSO mn Line) 131211738-3121 (ChIC490 Line) MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 988,SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 (6171744-0555(Salem line) (600)225-8828(Toll Free) January 10, 1984 ; i Mr . Joe Macponougl ) Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Branch 424 Trapelo goad a; Waltham, Massachusetts 02254 Dear Mr. McDonough:' Thank you for your time on January 3 , 1984 . Following bur conversation, this letter will provide you with information per your re questregarding the modification d of our plans for the development .of the Shetland Harbor Trust Building as 'it relates to the placement of brickmaterial on the adjacent mudflats . . Please �i refer to NEDOD-R- 24-83-074 and Department of the Army Permission number MA-SALE 83-040 (LOP ) , City of Salem Office of Inspector of Buildings Permit Number 423 , Salem Conservation Commission Order of Conditions File Number 64-86, Department of Environmental Quality Engineering, Division of Waterways File Number 83W-001 , Permit Number 109, Water Quality Certification-Waterways File Number 83W-001D. On November 22 , .1983, I met with Salem Harbormaster Mr. James Cahill to discuss the general status of our project, and more particularly our plans for the brick material' which is presently being stored on the intertida za;e of the South R=iver. Mr. •Cahill l expressed his appreciation .of our efforts to insure safe navigation in the South River which included float markers to indicate- project work area , Posting of DEQE sign identifying project, relocating brick material as close as possible to the building in a neat manner and consistently removing project related debris, and, in general, keeping the Harbormaster informed of our project schedule on a regular basis. Mr. Cahill explained that in his opinion the integrity of the tidal flats had been maintained, no navigational hazard had occurredor is likely to occur, and expecting that Shetland Properties development plans might have to be modified to postpone or not include the removal of the brick material, agreed that the integrity of the tidal 'flats 'A eaoeaiary of SHE'I LAND PROpERT1ES,ope,uin9 mnWly of equue pN of mduetaal pace Inthe united stet"end�Caneda. SALEM,NAS@ACHySETIti.ANOOVER,eeASSK IUSETT$ CWCAGO.ILLINOIS• TH dE1eC.INDIANA . .- .� 9RAe1PTpN ITORONT0)OMTA/tl0,CANADA' January 10, 1984 Page two . would not be compromised if this material remained as it is presentlysituated Shetland Properties hereby requests. your approval to modify previous plans for the removal of brick material from the tidal flats on its property adjacent''to Shetland Harbor Trust Building . It is our considered opinion that as% this material is presently situated it does` not pose a threat to the integrity -of the. intertidal zone and may even offer added stability :to this area. Furthermore, no navigational hazard due to, the storing of brick material has occurr6d from the inception of this project to date and the possibility of a future problem is this regard is nill. Therefore, Shetland Properties requests a modification in the project plan to now include the temporary stora9e ofthis material beyond May 1 , 1984 , which storage of material shall continue until the marina expansion project begins as in accordance with "Proposed Marina and Dredging" dated "July 10, 1980, " Department of the Army Permit Number MA-SALE-81-328, Application. Number 24-80-411 . Shetland Properties appreciates your continued support and, at this juncture, your prompt review of this request. Please contact me at your convenience if I can provide any needed information to facilitate your processes. Thank you. . i5.. Very truly yours,. SHETLAND PROPERTIES 1 Peter.W. Kronenberg Property Manager . jm cc.vCi ty of Salem Mr. Richard McIntosh, Building Inspector --'Salem Conservation Commission `Department of Environmental Quality Engineering Division of Waterways Mr. James Cahill Salem Harbormaster , Jean Guy Martineau, City Councilor / Waterways Advisory Board ^ Form 3 ( WETLANDS PROTECTION ACT MASSACHUSETTS G.L. C. 131 s. 40 NOTICE OF INTENT All parts of this form and the attached Environmental Data Form shall be completed under the pains and penalties of perjury. Incomplete filings may be rejected. DATE: . Nov. 24, 1982 Conservation Commission of (City/Town): Sale&, Wag 1. Notice is hereby given in accordance with the provi- sions of Massachusetts G.L. c. 131, s. 40 that the proposed activity described herein is within the juris- diction of City/Town Salem, Mass. at 29 Congress Street. Most recent recording at the. Registry of South Essex C Book '5532 , Page :32� Certificate (if registered) 38285 2. The land on which the w6ik is proposed to be done is owned by: NAt.[E(s) Shetland Properties ADDRESS 29 Congress_St.�, Salem_ - 3. The applicant submitting this Notice is: NAME Shetland Properties , ADDRESS 29 Coess St. , Salem TELEPHONE 744=0556 (Optional) The following person is hereby designated to represent the applicant in matters arising hereunder: NAMEBruce Erikson ADDRESS 29 Congress St Salem TELEPHONE 744-0556 -1- Form 3 continued 4. Plans describing, and defining the work, included herewith !C and made a part hereof, are titled and dated: Shetland Properties - Proposed Marina and Dredging Submitted: May 1980 Revised April 1 , 1981 5. Identical material has been submitted by certified mail as follo:as: not applicable "' r Original to Conservation Commission (DATE) Three copies to appropriate regional office of the Depart- ` ment of Environmental Quality Engineering (see map for regions and addresses). Date" NORTHEAST SOUTHEAST CENTRAL WESTERN 6. Has the required $25.00 filing fee, payable to the city or town, been included with the submission to the Conservation Commission? .yes • - 7. Has the Environmp—al Data Form been completed and submitted with each copy? .yes 8. Has a locus map (8',1" x 11" copy of USGS topographic sheet with the site marked) been included with each copy? yes •9A. Have all obtainable permits, variances, and approvals F' required by local by-law been obtained? _y-eS_ l B. If they have not been obtained, have they been applied for? If yes, include with the Notice of Intent any information which has been submitted with such applications which is necessary to describe the effect of the proposed activity on the environment. 10A. Ts the Site of the proposed work subject to a wetland rvstrlction ordrr recorded pursuant to G.L. c. 111, s. 40A, or C.L. c. 130, s. 105, by the Department of Environmental Management? YES ; NO ac _; Do Not Know B. Is the site of the proposed work in. or within 100. feet of: a coastal dune coastal bank _ = coastal beach ; salt marsh land under the ocean a salt pond —i anadronous/catadromous fish run ; do not know ? not not applicable 11. Signature(s) of owner(s) of the land (if by agent or option holder, written authorization must be attached) not applicable -2- (Form 3 continued) 12. What is the purpose of the proposed project? see sheet attached 13. 1 HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER THE PAINS AND PENALTIES OF PERJURY THAT THE FOREGOING NOTICE OF INTENT AND ACCOMPANYING ENVIRONMEN L DATA FORMARE_1PUE AND COMPLETE -Signature of Applicant Da e -3- Form 3 continued �• WETLANDS PROTECTION ACT ' ENVIRONMENTAL DATA FORM 1. All parts of this form are to be filled out by the applicant or his agent under the provisions of G.L. C. 131, s. 40. 2. Where a section is not relevant to the application in ques- tion, the wards "Not Applicable" should be entered on the appropriate line. NAME OF APPLICANT Shetland Properties ADDRESS OF APPLICANT 29 Congress St. , Salem, Mass. MUNICIPALITIES WHERE ACTIVITY IS PROPOSED AND NOTICE IS FILED Salem, V DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY INVOLVED IN APPLICATION (including the dimensions of any existing buildings, decks, marinas, existing cesspools)— ..See Plans DESCRIPTION OF MODIFICATIONS PROPOSED ON THE SITE, including grading, dredging, removal of vegetation, etc. See Plans A. SOILS not applicable - see attached material I. United States Department of i Aerimilture Soil Types (show on map) 2. Perm—bility of soil on the site. (Dates of testing.) 3. Rate of percolation of water through the soil. (Dates of testing.) B. SURFACE WATERS not applicable - see attached material 1. Distance of site from nearest surface water. (Date of measurement.) -4- 1 1 (Form 3, continued) 2. Soarcgs of runoff water. 3. Rate offrunoff from the site. 4. DestinatioF of runoff water. 5. Chemical additives to runoff water o^ *ht site. C. GROUND COVER not applicable - see attached 1. Extent of existing impervious ground cover on the site. 2. Extent of proposed impervious ground cover on the site. 3. Extent of existing vegetative cover on phe site. 4. Extent of proposed vegetative cover on tpe site. --- -- ------------- j D. TOPOGRAPHY not applicable - see attached 1. Maximum existing elevation on site. 2. Minimum existing elevation on site. 3. Maximum proposed elevation of site. 4. Minimum proposed elevation of site. 5. Descripti,:, of proposed change in topography. -5- f . (Form 3, continued) �• E. GROUND WATER not applicable - see attached 1. Minimum depth to water table on site (at time of filing) 2. Maximum depth to water table on site (at time of filing) F. WATER SUPPLY not applicable - see attached 1. The source of- the water to be provided to the site. 2. The expected rater requirements (g.pid.) for the site. 3. The uses to which water will be put. G. SEWAGE DISPOSAL not applicable - see attached 1. Sewage disposal system (description and location on -the site, of system) 2. Expected content of the sewage effluents (human waste, pesticides, _,. detergents, oils, heavy metals, other chemicals) 3. Expected daily volume of sewage. H. SOLID WASTE not applicable -. see attached 1. Estimated quantity of solid waste to be developed on the site. 2. Method for disposal of solid waste. 3. Plans for recycling of solid waste. i— -- -- I. BOAT YARDS, DOCKS, MARINAS not applicable - see attached 1. Capacity of marina (number of boats„ running feet) -6- (Form 3, continued) - 2. Description or docks and floats (si.te, 44mpnsions). 3. Description of sewage pumpout facilities (type of waste disposal). 4. Description of fueling facilities and fuel storage tanks. 5. Description of fuel spill prevention measures and equipment J. IMPACT OF PROPOSED ACTION APPLIED FOR not applicable - see attached 1. Effects on plant species (upland and mnrine). 2. Effects on marine species (shellfish, finfish) . - 3. Effects on drainage and runoff:. 4. Effects on siltation of surface waters. 5. Effects on groundwater quality. 6. Effects on ss-rface water quality. K. ALTE.RNATiVES TO PROPOSI?D ACTION not applicable - see attached 1. Describe alternatives to the requested action 2. Describe the benefits of the requested action over the alternatives. Notice of Intent under the Massachusetts Wetland Protection Act G.L. 131 c. 40 Dredging and Marina Installation at Shetland Properties South River Salem, Massachusetts 01970 September 30 , 1985 GULF OF MAINE RESEARCH CENTER INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SERVICES 30 CHURCH STREET SALEM, MA 01970 (617) 745-6618 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Notice of Intent - Standard forms 3-1 through 3-6 Appendix A Site Description, Part II of Notice of Intent Al to A2 Appendix B Work Description, Part III of Notice of Intent B1 to B2 Appendix C Map of Proposed Marina and Dredging Appendix D Wall Stability Study, December 28 , 1982 S6 Form 3 DEME File No. (To be provided by DEOE) Commonwealth � city/Town Salem ' of Massachusetts Applicant Shetland Properties c Notice of Intent Under the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act, G.L. c. 131, §40 and Application for a Department of the Army Permit Part I:General Information 1. Location:Street Address 29 Congress Street Lot Number 2. Project:Type Dredging Description Dredge area between existing channel and south bank, adjacent to' Shetland Properties. Expansion of existing marina. 3. Registry: County Essex County Current Book 5532 &Page 32 Certificate(If Registered Land) 4. Applicant Shatlana nr forties Tel. 7Qe_0556 Address 29 Congress Street, Salem, MA 5. Property Owner Shetland Prone_rt; Pc Tel. 74a_nSSG Address 29 Congress St. , Salem, MA 6. Representative Peter W- Krnnenhprg Tel. ten—. 556 Address Shetland Properties,29 Congress St. , Salem, MA. 7. Have the Conservation Commission and the DEOE Regional Office each been sent, by certified mail or hand delivery, 2 copies of completed Notice of Intent, with supporting plans and documents? Yes F9 No ❑ 3-1 S7 8. Have all obtainable permits,variances and approvals required by local by-law been obtained? Yes ❑ No See Below Status Obtained: : X �R� RrX Army (Corn of En"- ) PPrm; + • lkMn_c�ia_g�3ag� PX+o a; g tg r)@r DEQE (Div.of Waterways)_Licerise -#769 PXt nl�nT :FneSepteFF.Iqev225 ,1986 Salerri(Planning Board)Wetland and Flood Hazard Special PPrm; + • r—ant d ugust 80 , currently expired. Salem(Con Com) Notice of Intent:#64-65, Filed May 28, 1980 SVe artypcTtioil e S eesrUb�+ t t�� �i s eS fiction rder purrsuaenitto�L cx� e§'AOA or G.L c. 130, §105? Yes ❑ No J�l 10. List all plans and supporting documents submitted with this Notice of Intent. Identifying Number/Letter Title, Date Appendix A Part II :Site Description Narrative, Sept. 30 , 1985 Appendix B Part III : Work Description, Sept. 30 , 1985 Appendix C (Sheets 1,2 , 3 & 4) Maps of Proposed Marina and Dredging in South River Appendix D Wall Stability Study, Dec. 28 , 1982 11.Check those resource areas within which work is proposed: (a)M Buffer Zone (b)Inland: ❑ Bank* Land Subject to Flooding, ❑ Bordering Vegetated Wetland' ❑ Bordering ❑ Land Under Water Body&Waterway• ❑ Isolated (c)Coastal: It Land Under the Ocean' ❑ I Designated Port Area ❑ Coastal Beach• ❑ Coastal Dune ❑ Barrier Beach ® Coastal Bank XU Rocky Intertidal Shore' ❑ Salt Marsh' ❑ Land Under Salt Pond' ❑ Land Containing Shellfish' ❑ Fish Run Likely to involve U.S. Army Corps of Engl�aers concurrent jurisdiction. See General Instructions for Completing Notice of Intent. 3-2 SS Part If:Site Description Indicate which of the following information has been providerl (on a plan, in narrative description or calcula- tions)to clearly, completely and accurately describe existing site conditions. Identifying Number/Letter (of plan, narrative or calculations) Natural Features: Soils App.a QTY A Vegetation A Topography A Open water bodies(including ponds and lakes) " A Flowing water bodies(including streams and rivers) Public and private surface water and ground water supplies on or within 100 feet of site Maximum annual ground water elevations with dates and location of test n Boundaries of resource areas checked under Part I, item 11 above Other Man-made Features: n r Structures (such as buildings, piers, towers and headwalls) C Drainage and flood control facilities at the site and immediately off the site, including culverts and open channels (with inverts), dams and dikes C Subsurface sewage disposal posai systems C Underground utilities C Roadways and parking areas Property boundaries, easements and rights-of-way Other Part III:Work Description Indicate which of the following information has been provided(on a plan, in narrative description or calcula- tions) to clearly, completely and accurately describe work proposed within each of the resource areas checked in Part 1, item 11 above. Identifying Number/Letter (of plan, narrative or calculations) Planview and Cross Section of: _B Structures(such as buildings, piers, towers and headwalls) c: Drainage and flood contrcl facilities, including culverts and open channels(with inverts), " dams and dikes C Subsurface sewage disposal systems&underground utilities " Q Filing, dredging and excavating, indicating volume and composition of material C Compensatory storage areas,where required in accordance with Part III, Section 10:57 (4) of the regulations Other Point Source Discharge Description of characteristics of discharge from point source(both closed and open channel), when point of discharge falls within resource area checked under Part I, item 11 above, as supported by standard engineering calculations, data and plans, including but not limited to the following: 3.3 S9 1. Delineation of the drainage area contributing to the point of discharge; 2. Pre-and post-development peak run-off from the drainage area, at the point of discharge, for at least the 10-year and 100-year frequency stone; 3. Pre-and post-development rate of infiltration contributing to the resource area checked under Part I, item 11 above; 4. Estimated water quality characteristics of pre-and post-development run-off at the point of discharge. Part IV:Mitigating Measures 1. Clearly,completely and accurately describe, with reference to supporting plans and calculations where necessary: (a) All measures and designs proposed to meet the performance standards set forth under each re- source area specified in Part II or Part III of the regulations;or (b) why the presumptions set forth under each resource area specified in Part 11 or Part III of the regula- tions do not apply. J Coastal Resource Area Type: Identify ng number or letter o Inland Coastal Bank(Tncluding rocky intertidal sho e)of support documents The proposed work will impose no "impact of this coastal wetland resource. The Coastal Bank and Sea Wall will not be destabilized by restricting Appendix D dredging to four -feet or greater distance from the Sea Wall. Wall Stability Study . 7 Coastal Resource Area Type: Identifying number or lever -t7 Inland of support documents Dredging and removal operations will effectively eliminate the tide. flat and lower the land under the ocean. No commercially or ecologically important resources exist in either of these areas and thus no ecologically significant impact will occur. 3-4 90 0 Coastal Resource Area Type: Identifying number or letter 0 Inland of support documents 2. Clearly,completely and accurately describe, with reference to supporting plans and calculations where necessary: (a) all measures and designs to regulate work within the Buffer Zone so as to insure that said work does not alter an area specified in Part I, Section 10.02(1)(a)of these regulations; or (b) if work in the Buffer Zone will alter such an area, all measures and designs proposed to meet the performance standards established for the adjacent resource area specified in Part II or Part 111 of these regulations. I$ Coastal Resource Area Type Bordered By 100-Foot Discretionary Zone: Identifying number or letter 0 Inland of support documents One disposal optiop requires dredged materials (Apprx. 4000 cu ydsZdewatering and temporary Stora e on adjacent lan oc�ned by Shetland Properties. Drainage from these'"materials will be directed to the nearest storm sewer for immediate return to the ocean. Erosion and sedimentation will be con- trolled by the placement of sand bags around the perimeter of the storage area. Since this dredgin will occur during fall and winter months ,any noxio s odors emmanating from the pile should be minimal and temporary. Should they prove annoying, the application of lime (CaCO3) to the surface and/or lcovering the1 d any problem. 3.5 91 Part V: Additional Information for a Department of the Army Permit 1. COEApplication No..?f-80-441 2.__Bnt,+-h n; rro,-rc�l®rrAfa (to be provided by COE) (Name of waterway) 3. Names and addresses of property owners adjoining your property: Permit obtained Army Corps of Engineers permit No. MA-SALE-81-328 dated Oct. 13 , 1981 , has been revived and the expiration date extended to Dec. 31 , 1986 4. Document other project alternatives(i.e., other locations and/or construction methods, particularly those that would eliminate the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters or wetlands). 5. 8/2" x 11 " drawings in planview and cross-section, showing the resource area and the proposed activ- ity ctioity within the resource area. Drawings must be to scale and should be clear enough for photocopying. Certification is required from the Divsion of Water Pollution Control before the Federal permit can be issued. Certification may be obtained by contacting the Division of Water Pollution Central, 1 Winter Street Boston, Massacnosetts 02108. Where the activity will take place within the area under the Massachusetts approved Coastal Zone Management Program, the applicant certifies that his proposed activity compf>~s wde and will be conducted in a manner that is consistent with the approved program. Information provided will be used in evaluating the application for a permit and is made a matter of public. record through issuance of a public notice. Disclosure of this information is voluntary however ff necessary information s not provided. the application cannot be processed nor can a permit be issued. hereby certify under the pains and penalties of perjury that the foregoing Notice of Intent and accompanying plans,documents a d sup rti g data are true and complete, to the best of my knowledge.- Signature of Applicant Date Signature of Applicant's Representative' Date FORM "Exception to ENO Form 4715 approved by HQUSACE. 6 May 1982". NED 100 (TEST) 1 MAY 82 This document contains a Joint Department of the Army and State of Massachusetts application for a permit to obtain permission to perform activities in United States waters. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved those Questions required by the US Army Corp. of Engineers. OMB `:umber 0702-0006 and expiration date of 30 September 1987 .pplir.". This statement will be at in 6 point type. 3.6 APPENDIX A SITE DESCRIPTION, PART II OF NOTICE OF INTENT A-1 APPENDIX A Part II : Site Description The site consists of a strip of land 600 ' long along the south side of the South River in Salem, Massachusetts. In colonial times, the South River was a major port which extended into the center of present-day Salem, but gradual channelization and filling over the years has reduced the river to its present state.Pickering Wharf lies across the water from the site, whereas the old Naumkeag Mills Building (Shetland Industrial Park , Building No. l on the map in Appendix C) is immediately adjacent to the site. Four coastal wetland resource areas comprise the site : Coastal Bank, Rocky Intertidal Shore, Tideflat, and Land Under The Ocean. The foundation of Building No. l is a granite wall which forms the southern bank of the river at this point. This wall is a combination Coastal Bank and Rocky Intertidal Shore. However, as a bank, it does not contribute sediment to any adjacent beaches ; and as a rocky shore it displays the usual marine algae (Fucus vesiculosus and Ascophyllum nodosum) attached to the rocks which, along with barnacles, depict the usual rocky shore zonation as a result of the 9 ' to 11' tidal range. At the base of the wall, there is a band of Tideflat exposed at mean low tide. Land Under the Ocean comprized the sediment beneath mean low water. The narrow Tideflat appears to be grossly A-2 poluted, and there is no evidence of shell fish. Accordingly , it is unlikely that the Land Under the Ocean contains any commercially important resources. There is no evidence that the South River has supported an anadramous fish run in modern times. The upper reaches of the river have long been filled in and drainage reduced to culverts . The maximum existing elevation on the site is + 2.9 ' (MLW) at the Wall. The minimum existing elevation on the site is - 6 .0 ' (MLW) at the channel. APPENDIX B WORK DESCRIPTION , PART III OF NOTICE OF INTENT B-1 APPENDIX B PART III : Work Description The project involves the clamshell dredging of an area approximately 600 ' x 50 ' to -7 ' (4000 cubic yards) of river bottom material (sand and silt) within the area south of the main channel and the Shetland Properties Building No. 1 wall which serves as the coastal river bank. Appendix C (sheet 2) shows the extent of the proposed dredging, its slope and depth. There are two alternatives for dealing with the dredged materials (negotiations for final disposal are still in progress) : 1. The establishment of a dewatering station for temporary storage of the dredged materials at the Shetland Properties prior to landfill disposal. 2 . Transportation of the material by scow to the Federal Disposal Site. The Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers have in accordance with Title 33 CFR, part 325 . 6 (d) revived and extended the permit expiration date MA-SALE-81-328 (dated Oct. 13, 1981) to Dec. 31, 1986 . The marine work will include (see Appendix C: sheets.. 1, 3, & 4) : a. Approx. 600+ ' of main floating pier b. Twenty three (23) finger floats c. Two (2) floating sections d. One (1) floating section with electric pump-ejector to the sanitary sewer. B-2 e. One (1) fixed platform f. Four (4 ) gangways APPENDIX C MAP OF PROPOSED MARINA AND DREDGING APPENDIX D WALL STABILITY STUDY, DECEMBER 28 , 1982 WALL STABILITY STUDY SHETLAND PROPERTIES BUILDING NO.1 29 CONGRESS ST. SALEM, MA Prepared by+ BERNARD N. WEBB , P.E. 23 CAREY ROAD NEEDHAM, MA 02194 Tel: 449-1984 December 28, 1982 r WALL STABILITY STUDY SHETLAND PROPERTIES BUILDING NO. 1 PURPOSES Confirm that lateral stability of north stone wall will not be jeopardized by dredging removal of soil as required to accomodate proposed marina . (References Marina Plan by Sasaki Associates , Revision of 4-1-81) METHODOLOGYs 1) Observations and photographs , summer of 1982 . 2) Research on topographical history of area . 3) Test pits at base of wall. 4) Test- boring program. 5) Interviews with marine contractor and engineer. 6) Structural calculations . ATTACHNENTSs 1) Test Boring Location Plan dated 9-1-82. 2) Test Boring Drilling Logs , B&J Drilling (8 sheets) . 3) Photographs of existing wall and explorations . 4) Test Pits Field Data (rod probes) . 5) Structural Engineering Calculations dated 10-1. 6) North Wall Elevation (11" X 17" sheet) . 7) Section View Looking East DESCRIPTION OF TESTING PROGRAMS Exploration of the relevant terrain including a verification of bottom of wall location was made using a combination of hand dug test pits and selected test borings. Three borings were taken at. low tide using a portable drilling rig. Results of this program are attached. Wall Stability -2- 12-28-82 CONCLUSIONSs 1) EXISTING STRUCTURE As indicated in Reference #7, the existing stone wall is a continuous support element for the six-story concrete structure . Such Imposed vertical loads acting on the top of the wall strongly favor wall stability . Accordingly, the stone foundation may be considered laterally restrained at the top. 2) WALL DRAINAGE The open pointed composition of the wall allows for a free drainage of tidal waters in the receding phase . Such can be observed clearly at the site during outgoing tide . The building up of undesireable wet earth pressures against the inside of the wall is minimized. 3) SOIL COMPOSITION The test borings revealed the P resence of moderatelydense sand-gravel material generally from the level of the wall bottom downward. Below that , so-called refusal of the boring probe was reached between 12 and 16 feet, indicating the existance of hardpan or soft rock at those levels . Such materials offer good resistance to vertical pressures and to horizontal sliding tendencies . 4) FOUNDATION TYPE The bottom of the wall was ident- ified by test digging and probing with rods and is located as shown on Reference #7• While the presence of piling could not be confirmed, the soil materials present in the area would suggest a possible combin- ation of piling and continuous wall soil bearing . Wall Stability - 3 - 12-28-82 5) SOIL BEARING PRESSURE VECTOR The attached calc- ulations reveal that the ratio of horizontal earth pressure to vertical gravity loadings is such that the resultant pressure vector is markedly downward . Such a fact is favorable to lateral stability of the wall base , particularly where the earth near the base of the wall is counted on to resist outward movement in the event of the dredging removal of existing materials as proposed. 6) PROTECTIVE EARTH BERM In accordance with standard foundation design. practice regarding earth bearing footings , a protective slope of undisturbed earth called a berm (or anequivalent means ) Is recommended. Such an element serves the purpose of providing standard resistance to frost penetration at extreme low tides in winter, and also safeguards against long-term erosion of soils at the base of the wall . SUMMARY CONCLUSIONi On the basis of this analysis , the author confirms that a dredging configuration as shown on Reference #7 anJ Including the protective feature noted above will not adversely affect the existing building wall. It is recommended that all implimentation of such work be carried out utilizing the consultation of a qualified , registered marine �ineer. PREPARED BY:\� Bernard N. Webb, P.E. Attachments 23 Carey Road Needham, MA 02194 . • L�OIRIN �OCF�TION N 48 9 -I - 82 S6 733 134 '�` P33 [a7'] Cz�27 � CiE '7 OYES Z � '0,oa1r%�S PERF'D2MED 13-y L_-Q"Drzlwnq r 2)-Pbrirr-*Le Piq Lr�,Iw d ON TIDAL FLAT5 FOB Pa3 N O t� 0 C _ C15'J 1- J 0 -PLnN N T.S. 7PjZoDADLE • t2 SOtJLDER � •♦ RR.EA pE�ocr�noNs Shetland Properties B & J DRILLING HOLE NO. B-1 35 Congress St. 25 WINDSOR ROAD LINE 6 STA. SUDBURY, MASS. 01776 Salem, MA OFFSET JOB LOCATION Salem, MA - SURFACE ELEV. • PROJECT NAME Proposed Marina WATER LEVEL None at Comp DATE STARTED 9 /8/82 BORING FOREMAN D. Pitcher DATE FINISHED 9/8/82 INSPECTOR SCALE SAMPLE DEPTH 30"BLOWS STRATA INFPER 6" - CHANGE- FIELD CLASSIFICATION AND REMARKS ROM TO FEET ON SAMPLER 0 2 ' 4-5 4-3 Loose to firm Fill; Boulders, Sand, Gravel, Brick, Cinders, Silt, etc. 5 5' 7 ' 21-6 3-14 10 10' 10.5 ' 120 10.5 -- -- ---._ i Bottom of Hole 10.5 ' Refusal 120 Blows 0.5' Penetration with 140# Hammer Note: Made two trials 5 ' then 10' toward the r— building and was unable to penetrate past 11' . f— REMARKS: BLOW COUNT TAKEN WITH 140 LB. WEIGHT FALLING 30" ON 2" O.D. SPLIT SPOON UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED PROPORTIONS USED: TRACE = 0 • 10"*, SOME = 10 • 35%, AND = 35 - 50% Shetland Properties B & J DRILLING HOLE NO. B-2 35 Congress St. 25 WINDSOR ROAD LINE d STA. SUDBURY, MASS. 01776 Salem, MA OFFSET JOB LOCATION Salem, MA SURFACE ELEV. PROJECT NAME Proposed Marina WATER LEVEL 7.1' at Comp DATE STARTED 9/8/82 BORING FOREMAN D. Pitcher DATE FINISHED 9/8/82 INSPECTOR SCALE SAMPLE DEPTH 30"BLOWS STRATA IN PER 6' CHANGE - FIELD CLASSIFICATION AND REMARKS FEET FROM TO ON SAMPLER 0.5' 2.5' 2-4 2" Asphalt Pavement 4-11 Fill; Boulders, Sand, Gravel, Silt, .. Brick, Cinders, etc. , some voids 5 5' 7 ' 2-3 4-8 - 10 10' 12' 4-10 6-8 Bottom of Hole 13.0' Refusal 50 Blows 0" Penetration with 4001E Hammer on open-end AW rod REMARKS: BLOW COUNT TAKEN WITH 140 LB. WEIGHT FALLING 30" ON 2" O.D. SPLIT SPOON UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED PROPORTIONS USED: TRACE = 0 • 107a, SOME = 10 - 35%, AND = 35 • 50% _Shetland Properties B & J DRILLING HOLE NO. B-3 • 35 Congress St. 25 WINDSOR ROAD LINE & STA. SUDBURY, MASS. 01776 Salem, MA OFFSET JOB LOCATION Salem, MA SURFACE ELEV. PROJECT NAME Proposed Marina WATER LEVEL 9.0' at Comp DATE STARTED 9/8/82 BORING FOREMAN D. Pitcher DATE FINISHED 9/8/82 INSPECTOR SCALE SAMPLE DEPTH 30'BLOWS STRATA IN PER 6'• FIELD CLASSIFICATION AND REMARKS FEET FROM TO ON SAMPLER CHANCE 0.5' 2.5' 2-3 2" Asphalt Pavement 11-10 Firm Fill; Sand, Gravel, Brick, Cinders, etc. 5 5r- 76-5 7-14 10 10.0' 10' 12' 5-7 Loose to firm brown Silt, 4-3 12.0'! some fine Sand 15 Very compact fine to-coarse brown Sand, 15' 1 17' 44-42 some Silt 31-2 . 20 20.0'1 2 I I,. 22 Sounding 1 34 251 50 36 I 26.8' Bottom of Hole 26.8' Refusal 50 Blows 0.8' Penetration with 40011 Hammer on open-end AW rod REMARKS: ' to 26 A ' - BLOW COUNT TAKEN WITH 140 LB. WEIGHT FALLING 30" ON 2" O.D. SPLIT SPOON UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED PROPORTIONS USED: TRACE = 0 - 10%. SOME = 10 - 351/0, AND = 35 - 50%/ 'Shetland Properties ` B & J DRILLING HOLE NO. B-5 35 Congress St. 25 WINDSOR ROAD LINE & STA. SUDBURY, MASS. 01776 Salem, MA OFFSET JOB LOCATION Salem, MA SURFACE ELEV. PROJECT NAME Proposed Marina WATER LEVEL None at Comp DATE STARTED 9/10/82 - - .. BORING FOREMAN D. Pitcher DATE FINISHED 9/10/82 - INSPECTOR SCALE SAMPLE DEPTH 30"BLOW'S STRATA IN - PER 6" CHANGE FIELD CLASSIFICATION AND REMARKS FROM TO - FEET ON SAMPLER 0.5' 2.5 ' 11-7 2" Asphalt Pavement 12-12 Firm Fill; Sand, Gravel, Brick, Cinders, Silt, etc . - 5 5' ' 10-8 9-9 9 .111 _ Bottom of Hole 9.1' Refusal 50 Blows 0.1' Penetration with 40011 Hammer on open-end AW rod I REMARKS: BLOW COUNT TAKEN WITH 140 LD. WEIGHT FALLING 30•' ON 2" O.D. SPLIT SPOON UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED PROPORTIONS USED: TRACE = 0 - 1011c, SOME = 10 - 351/0, AND = 35 - 50-7 Shetland Properties $ & ] DRILLING HOLE NO. B-4 35 Congress St. 25 W'I'NDSOR ROAD LINE 6 STA. SUDBURY, MASS. 01776 Salem, MA OFFSET JOB LOCATION Salem, MA. . .. SURFACE ELEV. PROJECT NAME Proposed Marina WATER LEVEL 8.5' at Comp DATE STARTED 9/10/82 BORING FOREMAN D. Pitcher DATE FINISHED 9/10/82 INSPECTOR SCALE SAMPLE DEPTH 30"BLOWS STRATA IN -T— - PER 6" FIELD CLASSIFICATION AND REMARKS FEET FROM TO ON SAMPLER CHANGE 0.5' 2.5' 10-34 2" Asphalt Pavement 19-15 Loose to firm Fill; Sand, Gravel, Brick, Cinders, Silt, etc. 5 5' 7' 8-7 7-8 • 10 1012' 6-3 3- — i F_. 4-91 --------- 15' __-_1 ' 1 17' - 21-12 Compact to very compact fine to coarse gray Sand, 33-35 some Silt and fine Gravel 18 .0' 20 Sounding 91 Bottom of Hole 22.5' - Refusal 50 Blows 0.5' Penetration with 40011 Hammer on open-end AW rod REMARKS: ' R1nw rminrg frnm 19' tn 79 91 wprp fnken with 400# hAmmpr nn oppn-pnd BLOW COUNT TAKEN WITH 140 LB. WEIGHT FALLING 30" ON 2" O.D. SPLIT SPOON UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED PROPORTIONS USED: TRACE = 0• 101M. SOME = 10 - 359o, AND = 35 • 50%, ' Shetland Properties B & J DRILLING HOLE NO. PB-1 35 Congress St. 25 WINDSOR ROAD LINE a STA. SUDBURY, NIASS. 01776 Salem, MA OFFSET JOB LOCATION Salem, MA SURFACE ELEV. PROJECT NAME Proposed Marina WATER LEVEL Com Surface at DATE STARTED 9/$/$2 BORING FOREMAN D. Pitcher DATE FINISHED 9/8/82 INSPECTOR SCALE SAMPLE DEPTH 30"BLOWS STRATA IN -- PERx12 FIELD CLASSIFICATION AND REMARKS FEET FROM TO ON SAMPLER CHANGE 11 21 12 - 5 3 Sounding 35 25 16 19 - 10 37 87 100 Bottom of Hole 12.0' Refusal 100 Blows 1.0' Penetration with 14011 Hammer , Note: Blow counts taken with 14011 hammer. , i i REMARKS: BLOW COUNT TAKEN WITH 140 LB. WEIGHT FALLING 30" ON 2" 0.D. SPLIT SPOON UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED PROPORTIONS USED: TRACE = 0 • 10*, SOME = 10 • 35/0, AND = 35 • 50% shetiand Properties B & J DRILLING HOLE NO. PB-2 ^35 Congress St. 25 WIND.ti )R ROAD LINE 6 STA. SUDBURY, MASS. 01776 P Salem, MA OFFSET JOB LOCATION Salem, MA SURFACE ELEV. PROJECT NAME Proposed Marina WATER LEVEL 0.2' at Comp DATE STARTED 9/10/82 BORING FOREMAN D. Pitcher .DATE FINISHED 9/10/92 _�SPECTOR SCALE SAMPLE DEPTH 30"BLOWS -STRATA INFIELD CLASSIFICATION AND REMARKS v? FEET FROM TO ON SAMPLER 3 6 1 1 5 4 103 45 Sou n ding 88 46 10 51 50 60 57 15 =±57 14.9' 120/.9 — - Bottom of Hole 14.9 ' Refusal 120 Blows 0.9 ' Penetration with 14011 Hammer on open-end AW rod Note: Blow counts taken with 14011 hammer. i REMARKS: BLOW COUNT TAKEN WITH 140 LB. WEIGHT FALLING 30" ON 2" O.D. SPLIT SPOON UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED PROPORTIONS USED: TRACE = 0• 10^6, SOME = 10 • 35''/0, AND = 35 - 5017b Shetland Properties B & J DRILLING HOLE NO. PB-3 35 Congress St. 25 WINDSOR ROAD LINE 6 STA. _ SUDBURY, MASS. 01776 Salem, MA OFFSET JOB LOCATION Salem, MA SURFACE ELEV. PROJECT NAME Proposed Marina WATER LEVEL 0.7' at Comp DATE STARTED 9/10/82 .. BORING FOREMAN D. Pitcher DATE FINISHED 9/10/82 I INSPECTOR SCALE SAMPLE DEPTH 30"BLOWS IN PERX'i2" STRATA FIELD CLASSIFICATION AND REMARKS FEET FROM TO ON SAMPLER CHANGE - - 2 — _- 1 3 16 5 56 Sounding 2 2 4 10 9 13 12 30 15 120 8 1 ------ ....... _ ._. . . _. . .. Bottom of Hole 15.8' Refusal 120 Blows 0.8' Penetration with 14041 Hammer on open-end AW rod ' I Note: Blow counts taken with 14041 hammer. REMARKS: BLOW COUNT TAKEN WITH 140 LB. WEIGHT FALLING 30" ON 2" O.D. SPLIT SPOON UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED PROPORTIONS USED: TRACE = 0 - 10;ffi, SOME = 10 - 35%, AND = 35 - 50% ti f V. � x s '• jzl �cT W.� '^. ►rc,e. Y'"�` ".�E-f `r- 3f' z - viz ' _ `",� ,r.� i w �• ...aA . 'i, r fe MIN V s V � •wife ,fi � •/ +� \� A* d_., �,d'Rc�rh3'h 4,'r�k+t`}v 'y".�"F`c rrt:xw a, 7`�'baits ,,`�.a6v r•f�lr•�-�'�:. r / r $ x r y _ �.+�'irk:, n;�•< `k .\,�'..r Iit ti~f p t�`�'� x'+�c„�}�f yp6Rs :,ice ,✓t x<!+'$f''✓'u N ✓�-r r., : �� _ ,� � -.� u ti ! l F-12D LJ�Tr1 of Lxrnr�er Vrzom � t,,�_— RdUGIa �ICI.� r�orES �\X ,7- TO _ S�pPex 9- I 0-82 SSE( ZCD RODC !�� I © 7•0 22 DCC-P P I OGA 02,c- (7 YPCAI.) TOP OF �l iT(�ry) _(7 c S QF W r IA, U ERl Fl C�T1 O N TPD of T^ � STONE wl'iLL FI_ T ES ��'� ' • ,_ ,_l-:.!� TC—RT1Y��N Ci•NY� TIr•i'�l. r �- CONp11'IC�� pn,FY,��NTC Z D _ n2oc L — — � vh � � C Ir.� fyL c'�i�P(�.�.,2E c)F LorrC LE0GC Vi aw Loo lciN L -r 3 tory c PiKR C0NG. I �.�__ F—xP05c0 (1-RV touc) rLArS 2 .0 +pRZNErcLF- i T F-OO INQ 1 f ^00 c,2 PLG crap pncpe r CL1=VRTI_c)N LoOKINQ_Cr�ST /�T N•W. con-NCR 'A , r�nLy � l-+ ETLt"�t\ir� T.�VI L�IN�# I 10 - I • � 2j A-n-orL G2��ITl' �on-r� s : �>=�2 �QFr st.r�c3s� r=r �-L UGO 25T Inc , co315 �'J 15 ) - j T-LOOP- SL � TO2 ta2TFl • 090 STTaDfLITY '. j '�FtilraL L. L, . . C) ONLY _Q 1 r o x 5 Fuz = .550 141NGE , -asm,n /A55umcD _ c�ssum Lranri-� r3r=r�r2rrvG. ___ TOTraL CyCCUM. LOnQ5 - - _ Lor�S T� CT2 T--00T INoT'E rr-)pjz7RING ' - ,r r3�v wlnrf� �cro>< 709 x 5 x 17/2 = 3 .O I. K/rr r-L-0025 W 4 x 40//6 ,b ' 1 , 37 CO LS. Isco 'W3 _ 2-4-xG9/0Op = i.• G6 wr;LL crap VOID r-ra(::,rcr2 , ; C�7=nec turn) Z X.1 50 3 IG. 54 H/FT /aVC-aGZC J �I�TZTI { i�2L55UT21= ("c-c"vIVnLr--NT) , WILL 0r4RIN1:D USC . 045 UNIT' PTZC550RC 45 x K �2 F7' I� - •0 'Pn_c�5L2r.� yCciyTz, (r-rzlcnoN I,.xu.ur�c-e� � IF- Au. Prze55V2C- �}cr1NG r,T I30i7� .5,06 Tan . 305 AGrV191.1.Y 1ZC`?IT �N P2�SSURE I 17 2 'Pn55 VE TGE P2cssU�C. — 7-:PI L E Trop FT?-ICT-ION j Lr,)Cbc-'DI`r1LrVT F�1- TOP Q� �i�x5.06 = 1 . 69 K -P6ftr+v = 16, 54-10.5= 6.46 N/,= •26 5 o'TOT21E5 r A a ° �z I fna_ ST rL T 12• P—UILDING No 1. p TO CHANNEL -- . .... —........—. _. Z-HCTLr1 ND "rCP. 'n � U, J I J J .. - STONE— % U. - ll\ 3 MHw .. :. AFvrc"x. WWW . �. Ex 15-1G Nry� ! - LF�r3TH W�oD �I _ MANN \J F J i CCNgI>-IQN / IVDU DUTLINE OF PILES v FLOflTS �( P y'e\117 I AB SHOWN ON SA5AI<I As5oa nwo5 GTH STONE JOINT GOWN 2O 1 ,2 ECOMM EnDED 3 / LIMIT OF Tj� DREGINGI/SPP RO VE'D — —�rzEtOC"ING LINE 1 �/ PIPR5URFA I 6LANKET cWIR III / �U(Zf-ACING 77 EQ(JIR EU JECTION VFy. - LOOKING CAST SHOWS VEII1FIED WALL C.ONpIGURT-IT/ON 4 G7Rt"TDG)NG LIMITS N ExsTG wIaLL N PrzORLE ` � N nj I''^ TriIDL SLOPE V) 9 3 - g IG IL 1 I 21 102 { 12 �.. 4.1 OOOJJJq L Lae Q 41S op t 2" T1EF. TO C l 13.l 19 SVR7=SCE �, �', eo P¢R 15 FOOT . . -15.9 109 31 -12,0 81 -I4.9 0',0127 (UNCR9ED) REPUSHL a°12C16Q = 100 TIEFUSAL :.0; " REFUSAL .o.� � :pro ncl�NG (Sol NGE RIG. 1 / �TRII<BN qT .LOW TIDE _ 'PjORINC T?Cil / E- c) <INIG PG2 �G^<In/G P133 �. LCG >✓RCFILES SHOWN � , r_ EpcT��. � 8 JIEFRENCE IC LSU/LDING �� 16.9 '� 24 H"H VRI D GOLVMNS iHrtP) y HHHH ' - � � MRSS GCN;.Rb�TE- FOUN DTti TION WgLL —� � DTt RIN' r _ ROGK P/LES, 1 I —f— Ho HLHHH:H [d H, Ex 5TG CIgTITH-ROCK SPOT L,E •��� - _ _ - TEl 13 l Ca ST PIT 2 PLOTTED RT FiGF TEST PIT-3� TEST PIT LiOT(CM OF WALL STONE CCUR.-E`7 V or " 'PORINGAPPx, 2O PDI U'OTlING pU2 6onING. T'G3 NOT2TH WALL ELEVA-riON CXAC—•�E2r-IrF-D VERTIGFL SCREE �8 =1-d, I-Il SCREE 1"= 30' SHETLAND PROPERTIES . 'SHETLAND PROPERTIES/ANDOVER 'SHETLAND PROPERTIES of CHICAGO, INC. Telephone: 'SHETLAND PROPERTIES of ILLINOIS, INC. (617)475-6760(Andover,Line) 'SHETLAND PROPERTIES of INDIANA,INC. (617)289-2506(Boston Line) RUTHERFORD ROAD REALTY LIMITED (312)736-3121 (Chicago Line) (617) 744-0556(Salem Line) MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 986, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 (800)225-6826(Toll Free) Development plans for Shetland Harbor Trust Building include the .//,,QQ 5 temporary locating of brick infill panels (438 cubic�Feet�on the tidal flats owned by Shetland Properties adjacent to building. Materials will be removed no later than May 1 , 1984. No other material to be removed or typographical change unless in accordance, with current permits allowing for dredging of subject area. 'A subsidiary of SHETLAND PROPERTIES,operating millions of aquare feet of industrial space in the United States and Canada. SALEM.MASSACHUSETTS•ANDOVER,MASSACHUSETTS•CHICAGO,ILLINOIS•SOUTH BEND,INDIANA•BRAMPTON(TORONTO)ONTARIO,CANADA NYRIU�' WE 23 Congress Street,Salem, Massachusetts 01970 617744-2727 March 8, 1984 Conservation Commission City of Salem Re: Shetland Properties Dear Sirs; As operators of Pickering Wharf Marina and therefore abutters of Shetland Properties at 35 Congress Street, Salem, Ma, we. state the following: 1) Shetland Properties has cooperated with our Marina in all marine related aspects. 2) We are in favor of their application to defer for one year the removal of the building spoils (bricks) from the South River, Salem, Ma. Sincerely, TiPbysur2&Q W. H. Kelley, T s rer CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS PLANNING DEPARTMENT e 2 W.GREGORY SENKO ONE SALEM GREEN CITY PLANNER N 01970 (617)744-4560 's March 8, 1984 Mr. Philip D. Moran, Chairman Salem Conservation Commission One Salem Green Salem, MA. 01970 Dear Mr. Moran: This letter is to inform you that the Planning Department is pursuing Shetland Industrial's request to extend the present CARD (commercial area revitalization district) to include the wharf area surrounding Shetland Industrial Park. The Planning Department has made initial inquiries to the Massachusetts Executive Office of Communities and Development for their review of the po- tential CARD extension. This is the first step in the CARD extension ap- proval process. We are anticipating the EOCD will do an inspection of the proposed extension area and give their approval of the potential CARD district within the next three to four weeks: We will keep you informed of the progress .in this area. If there is any further information I can provide regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely yours, Beverly Estes-Smargiassi Acting Assistant Planning Director BES:dey cc Peter Kronenberg, Property Manager, Shetland Properties ECOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF PROPOSED OCEANIC DISCHARGE OF DREDGED MATERIAL FROM SALEM HARBOR, MASSACHUSETTS -- Contract No. DACW33-79-C-0063 - Delivery Order No. DACW33-80-F-0031 J Prepared for: New England Division, Corps of Engineers i Department of the Army i 424 Trapelo Road Waltham, Massachusetts 02154 Attention: NED Materials Testing Laboratory J l Prepared by: Aquatic Sciences Division Energy Resources Company Inc. 185 Alewife Brook Parkway ` Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 1 a 1 _ December 1979 l a ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 1 I This evaluation was written by Dr. Curt D. Rose , Direc- tor, Aquatic Sciences Division, Energy Resources Company - Inc. (ERCO) . Mr. Robert L. Boeri , Aquatic Toxicologist, ERGO, and Mr. Timothy J. Ward , Director, Aquatic Toxicology ! Laboratory, ERCO, collected dredged sediment, control sediment, and reference sediment. •Mr . Boeri, with the I supervision of Mr. Ward , prepared sediment and water for bioassays ( toxicity tests) and conducted bioassays. J i i l - l 1 SUMMARY J Thero osed P P oceanic discharge e of dredged ged material from Salem Harbor, Massachusetts to the " "Boston" Dump Site for Dredged Material is ecologically acceptable as judged by the bioassay-based criteria employed in this evaluation. Survival of copepods- (Acartia toInsa) , mysid shrimp (Neomysis americana ) , and Atlantic silversides (Menidia menidia) exposed for 96 hr to culture water control and 100$ liquid and suspended l particulate phases of three samples of dredged material was .1 not significantly different (CY = 0.05 ) .) • I n addition, total (combined) survival of grass shrimpP ( alaemone tes u io hard clams (Mere_ e_ n_ aria mercenaria) , and sandworms -) , (Nereis virens ) exposed for 10 days to reference (disposal-site) sediment and the solid phase of the three samples of dredged material was notsi nif ' s 9 cantly differentCY = 0 ( .05) . -.7 ii 1 . INTRODUCTION The major objective of this evaluation is to assess the ecological acceptability of the proposed oceanic discharge of dredged material from Salem 'Harbor, Massachusetts , to the "Boston" Dump Site for Dredged Material (Figure 1 ) . If the proposed discharge is judged to be ecologically acceptable according to the bioassay-related criteria employed in the 1 evaluation, the disposal practice is considered to be in partial compliance with Subpart B (Environmental Impact) of the ocean dumping regulations (U.S. EPA, 1977) . =j Subpart B (Environment Impact) of the ocean dumping J regulations consists of the following basic sections: §227.5 (Prohibited Materials) ; §227. 6 (Constituents Pro- hibited as Other than Trace Contaminants) ; §227 .7 (Limits Established for Specific Wastes or Waste Constituents) ; §227 .8 (Limitations on the Disposal Rates of Toxic Wastes) ; .§227.9 (Limitations on Quantities of, Waste Materials) ; §227 .10 (Hazards to Fishing , Navigation, Shorelines or Beaches) ; §227.11 (Containerized Wastes) ; and 5227 .13 (Dredged Materials) . Disposal of dredged material must comply with restrictions and limitations imposed by 5227 . 5, §227 . 6 , §227 . 9, §227 .10 , and §227.13 of the regulations (U.S. EPA, 1977) . Dredged material from Salem Harbor complies with §227. 5 (Prohibited Materials ) of the ocean dumping regulations since it does not contain high-level radioactive wastes; materials used for warfare; .insufficiently described materials ; or persistent, inert substances that may interfere materially with legitimate uses of the ocean. Compliance of the material } with toxicological (bioassay-based) criteria identified in §227 . 6 (Constituents Prohibited as Other than Trace -1- _J 2 c / Eli (A )i DREDGING SITE °ra a>9 it < :E / L-21 -'•_r, � • a< , E�\ �/�l� y .� r'/L../�G^v��c.� • :.56 j7 ' /17 2-- e. "C', o"9 S' i] t : ,\� : •�//�_ 161�W] :.R • � 1 �� ' `i� 5`•' °` � ^I > 27 T 9 i� ♦ �./ ��/C ` M�° 1/�� 00,1\ •• 0• 10' G :' aA. SALEM `_• CH 1TOOw C�In ( � \ ® *� <•� J! °...9 2 Y s G°b/ru^. .•\.< ''. S.6.i' ':. ..-6..rr,lo�1 �ir� �>• 'r, . n A E,.c x S c�i e., Pickering Wharf 7 y '�«`+•*'- =7 s 5 - /< �� 1 .B-Ft Anchorage Area *'< P�� -` ] 2 S A L E.L ! 2 STATION A White Nun "A"Buoy "1 --•i�l.,r :w. TOW y f u ez t`r \ P-< 1 10 *4. 2 A f %n P;,R jrA RBO.Ri 6-Ft Channel \� 1 k'r Cr• � .€i"Pl. '+' ::. -5 . °i a ..la:` STATION C 9 T . II a< „ �\\ ty STATION B Derby Wharf 7 31: 8-Ft Channel — i• I[$.oiitli edern s: � C ��/� 7 1�LJ( •• ~ T i ' c SALEM HARBOR ? NOT TO SCALE '' \h DISPOSAL SITE __� _ 212. 2*0 •�>•� � \.� .., � lee -'_ , / 102 /164 - / 1 J 262 A / 235 216 lei 7 N _ 270 .2.60__ --` r 69 \: NOT TO SCALE 136 x72.. 278 /2161 \ 2I90_�=,i i 7e �— —�l- 1\ n i i pe^: L11 STATION 67 DUMP 5!r[ y !' V lmawn•w'wmil \ \ I `\'� 1 '1H7�2__ _ \ 1 I 2° h 257 2 !d� dS1GS� \\ \ r \ 1 29 S I 27 20, . 2210 \ 777 Su Vey of 19 x61 ! 275 - � /` � 291 290 a0 1.1u11� uullu./1:.r•. JO "Z-0 ,\1"` ` �' '.1�2220- / 2 276 270. I 207 Figure 1.—Locations of proposed dredging and disposal sites. Sampling stations for jj sediment are depicted in insets. —2— J . _ Contaminants) and 5227.13 ( Dredged Material) of the regula- tions is addressed in this evaluation. The evaluation consists of four principal sections in addition to the Introduction. The first section , which precedes the Introduction, summarizes the ecological accept- ability of the proposed discharge operation. The second section reviews the methods and materials employed in the evaluation. The third section presents important results of the evaluation. The fourth section contains references cited in the evaluation. The evaluation contains two appendices. Appendix A details laboratory procedures employed for preparing dredged material and conducting bioassays. The appendix also serves as a quality-control document. Appendix B contains all unanalyzed bioassay-related data. . Only data directly relevant 1 to the ecological evaluation of the proposed discharge opera- tion are presented in the main body of the evaluation. -3- 2. METHODS AND MATERIALSI Proposed dredged material was collected from three sampling stations in Salem Harbor (Figure 1) during 1200-1330 on October 30, 1979 . Material was collected from the vessel Bobby L III by Mr. Robert L. Boeri , Aquatic Toxicologist, Energy Resources Company Inc. (ERCO) , and Mr. Timothy J. Ward, Director, Aquatic Toxicology Laboratory, ERCO. Station A was located in the 6-ft channel of Salem Harbor approximately 14 m southwest of a corner of Pickering Wharf. Station B was situated in the 8-ft channel about 9 m southwest of a point on the western edge of Derby Wharf approximately 90 m from its end. Station C was located in the 8-ft anchorage area about 37 m southeast of White Nun "A" Buoy. Water depth at all stations was about- 2-3 M. At each station, three 15-liter bags of dredged material were collected with a Van Veen grab after the vessel had been anchored. Each set of bags was assigned an identification i number (Station A, Station S, and Station C) . The bags were sealed and transported immediately to ERCO 's Toxicology Laboratory in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Bags were placed into cold storage (2-4' C) at the laboratory at 1500 on October 30 , 1979. Dredged material was prepared for biological testing according to procedures described in Appendix B of the _ manual entitled Ecological Evaluation of Proposed Discharge of Dredged Material into Ocean Waters (U.S . EPA and U.S . Army COE, 1977) . Artificial seawater (30 ppt salinity) was employed to formulate liquid and suspended particulate phases of dredged material. During preparation of the i lLaboratory procedures used to prepare dredged material and conduct bioassays are described in detail in Appendix A of this evaluation. -4- liquid and suspended particulate phases , dredged material and artificial seawater were mixed by mechanical methods ( as opposed to mixing by compressed air) since anoxic conditions did not occur in the sediment-seawater mixtures . In prepa- ration of the liquid phase, centrifu ation was no t required to reduce concentrations of suspended solids prior to filtration. Bioassays with dredged material were, with one exception, conducted according to guidelines presented in J Appendices D and F of the :EPA and COE manual for dredged J material (U.S. EPA and U.S. Army COE, 1977) . The one exception is that 19-liter aquaria, rather than 38-liter aquaria, were used to conduct liquid and suspended particu- late phase bioassays with fish. The use of the smaller ,f aquaria is sanctioned by the EPA in its contemporary proce- dures for performing bioassays for the Ocean Dumping Permit Program (U.S. EPA, 1978) . Species employed in the liquid and suspended particu- late phase bioassays were the copepod (Acartia tonsa) , mysid shrimp (Neomysis americana) , and Atlantic silverside ( Menidia menidia) . All organisms were purchased from Sea Plantations , Inc. , Salem, Massachusetts , and acclimated in artificial seawater for at least 3 days prior to use in bioassays . ti Bioassays were conducted at 20 + 1" C, the recommended summer testing temperature for the New England region (U.S. EPA and U.S . Army COE, 1977) . Artificial seawater was used to dilute liquid and suspended particulate phases to appropriate test concentrations and as a control (culture water control) . -1 1 -5- J . � . Species tested in the solid phase bioassays were the grass shrimp ( Palaemonetes pugio) , hard clam (Mercenaria mercenaria) , and sandworm (Nereis virens) . Grass shrimp and 1 hard clams were obtained from, respectively, Sea Plantations and Long Island Shellfish, Inc. , West Sayville , New York. Sandworms were acquired from a commercial supplier in Boston, Massachusetts. Animals were acclimated in artificial seawater for at least 3 days prior to initiation of testing . All species were tested in the same aquaria. Testing temperature was again 20+1°C. Water exchange ( artifical seawater) was by the replacement, as compared to the flow- through , method. Control (culture) sediment employed in the tests was collected on November 5, 1979, from Lynn Harbor. The sediment, which was collected by Mr. Boeri and Mr . Ward , consisted primarily of sand. Reference (disposal-site) jsediment used in the tests was collected at 1000-1200 on November 1, 1979, from a single sampling station ( 3H5-1447 and 1H7-2200) located approximately 2 km due west of the "A" buoy in the Boston Dump Site (Figure 1) . The sediment was collected with a Van Veen grab operated from the vessel by Mr . Boeri and Mr. ward . Depth of water at the sampling station was approximately 80 m. The sediment was put in plastic bags and placed in cold storage ( 2-40C) at ERCO' s Toxicology Laboratory at 1600 on November 1 , 1979. !f Mysid shrimp exposed to liquid and suspended particulate phases of dredged material were fed live 48-hr-old Artemia (brine shrimp) nauplii at a rate of approximately 1 ml of culture/200-m1 crystallizing dish/day. Grass shrimp exposed to the solid phase of dredged material were not fed. 1 J -6- 1 n 3. RESULTS The three samples of dredged material employed in the evaluation consisted primarily of black silt (visual deter- mination ) . The reference (disposal-site) sediment was similar in texture to the samples of dredged material . 3 .1 Liquid and Suspended Particulate Phase Bioassays Results of liquid and suspended particulate phase bioassays are presented according to the same format since analyses of both types of tests are based on identical components (U.S. EPA and U.S. Army COE, 1977) : ( 1 ) selection of an appropriate control for comparison to test results (when disposal-site water as .well as culture water is used for control purposes ) , ( 2) preliminary comparison of survival of animals exposed for 96 hr to the appropriate control and 1008 liquid/suspended particulate phase, ( 3) calculation or estimation of an exposure-time-dependent LC50 (median lethal concentration) and associated 0 .95 confidence interval for the liquid/suspended particulate. phase ( if survival in 1008 liquid/suspended particulate phase is significantly less (in a statistical sense] than survival in the appropriate control) , ( 4) derivation of an exposure-time-dependent limiting permissible concentration (LPC) for the liquid/sus- pended particulate phase by multiplying the lower limit of the 0 . 95 confidence interval of the LC50 for the phase by 0.01 or a pragmatically determined application factor, and ( 5) graphical comparison of the LPC for the liquid/suspended particulate phase to the estimated environmental concentration -7- ( "dilution curve" ) of the phase as determined , in all probability, by the release zone method . 3.1 .1 Liquid Phase Bioassays Data generated by liquid phase bioassays with copepods , mycid shrimp, and Atlantic silversides are presented in, 1 respectively, Tables B1 , B2, and B3 (Appendix B) . All 1 species were relatively resistant to the liquid phase, e .g . , 1 mean survival of organisms exposed for 96 hr to 1008 phase J was 76. 7-80 . 08 (copepods ) , 90 . 0-93 . 38 (mysid shrimp) , and 1 86 . 7-100 . 08 (Atlantic silversides) . Analyses of survival data for copepods, mysid shrimp, jand Atlantic silversides exposed for 96 hr to culture water control and 1008 liquid phase of dredged material are pre- sented in Tables 173 , respectively. In the case of all species, mean survival in the control test was equal to or Igreater than 908 , thus permitting further analyses of data. Survival data for the three species (Tables 1-3) exhibited homogeneity of variances, as judged by Cochran ' s test. Therefore, parametric one-way analyses of variance 1 (ANOVA' s) with nontransformed data were employed to determine if the three sets of survival data are characterized by significant differences ( the "t" test described in 925 , Appendix D of .the EPA and COE manual for dredged material [U.S. EPA and U.S. Army COE, 1977] is not appropriate for 7 use with more than one sample of dredged material and a control ) . 1 -8- 1 1 l• n .. Table 1. Analysis of survival data for copepods, Acartia tonsa, exposed for 96 hr to culture water control and 100% liquid phase of dredged material Step 1. Survival Data (From Table B1) Number of Survivors Treatment (t): Culture Dredged Dredged Dredged Water Material - Material - Material - Replicate (r) Control Sample A Sample B Sample C ) 1 10 10 6 9 I 2 _. ._.: 9 8 10 9 3 9 5 8 . 5 Mean (x): .9.33(93.38) 7.67(76.78) 8.00(80.06) 7.67(76.7%) i Step 2. Cochran's Test for Homogeneity of Variances of Survival Data Number of Survivors Treatment (t) Mean (x) Variance(s2) Culture Water Control. 9.33 0.33 Dredged Material - Sample A 7.67 6.33 Dredged Material - Sample B 8.00 4.00 Dredged Material - .Sample C 7.67 5.33 C s2(max.) 6.33 0.40 ns, (cal.) Est X99 as compared to: C(tab.) 0.77 for a 0.05, k 4, and v 2 Step 3. Parametric One-Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) of Survival Data Sum of Mean Source of variation df Squares Square r(cal.) Treatment (Culture Water Control, t-1-3 5.67 1.89 0.47 ns, Dredged Material - Sample A. - - as compared Dredged Material - Sample 8, to F(tab.) Dredged Material - Sample C) 4. 7 for a a 0.05, numerator Error t(r-1).8. 32.00 4.00 df - 3, and denominator Total tr-1-11 37.67 df 8 Table 2. Analysis of survival data for mysid shrimp, Neomysis americana, exposed for 96 hr to culture water control and 1008 liquid phase of dredged material Step 1. Survival Data (From Table B2) Number of Survivors Treatment (t): Culture - Dredged - - Water Material - Dredged Dredged Material - Material Replicate (r) Control - Sample A Sample B Sample C 2 10 10 10 B 9 9 9 3 ;�10 9 9 10 Mean (x): - 9.67(96.78) 9.33(93.38) 9.33(93.38) 9.00(90.04). Step 2. Cochran's Test for Homogeneity of Variances of Survival Data Number of Survivors Treatment (t) Mean (x) Variance(s2) Culture Nater Control 9.67 0.33 Dredged Material - Sample A . 9.33 0.33 Dredged Material - Sample B 9.33 0.33 Dredged Material - Sample C 9.00 1.00 s2lC(ca1.) Es(max. �T 0.50 ns, as compared to: C(tab.) 0.77 for a 0.05, k v 4, and v 2 Step 3. Parametric One-Way Anaf" sis of Variance (ANOVA) of Survival Data Source of Variation Sum of Mean df Squares Square F(cal.) Treatment (Culture Water Control, t-1-3 0.67 0.22 G.44 ns, l Dredged Materia - Sample A, Dredged Material - Sample B, as compared. Dredged Material - Sample C) G0 F(tab.) 4. 7 for . . a - 0.05, Error e(r-1)-e 4.00 0.55 numerator df - 3, and T 4 67 denominator Total tr-1-11 df 8 —10— T401e 3. Analysis of survival data for Atlantic silversides, Menidia menidia, exposed for 96 hr to culture water control and 1008 liquid phase of dredged materia Step 1. Survival Data (From Table B3) 0 - Number of Survivors 0000 Treatment (t): Culture Dredged Dredged Dredged li Water Material - Material - Material - Replicate (r) Control Sample A Sample B Sample C 1 8 10 10 9 n 2 10 10 9 7 iA1 3 9 10 10 10 Mean (x): 9.00(90.04)- 10.00(100.08) 9.67(96.78) 8.67(86.76) Step 2. Cochran's Test for Mcmoceneity of Variances of Survival Data li Number of Survivors Treatment (t) Mean (z) Variance(s2) Culture Water Control 4 9.00 1.00 Dredged Material r Sample A 10.00 0.00 Dredged-Material —Sample 8 9.67 0.33 B Dredged..Material - Sample C 8,67 2.33 j - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ..aa s2 max.) 2.33 (cal.) ES2 ` y u 0.64 ns, as compared to: C(tab.) ` 0.77 fora ` 0.05, k ` 4, and V 2 Step 3. _Parametric One-Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) of Survival Data Sum of Mean Source of Variation df Squares Square ?(cal.) Treatment (Culture Water Control, t-1-3 3.33 1.11 1.21 ns, Dredged Material - Sample A. as compared Dredged a g Material SamP le B to F` Orad ed Material - Sample�C tab. ) 3.07 for a - oats, Error t(r-1)`8 7.33 0.92 numeratordf - 3, and Total er-1`11 10.67 denominatordf . 8 i � I -11- i t . Results of the ANOVA's of survival data for all species (Tables 1, 2, and 3) indicate no statistically significant ,• 1' differences (a = 0.05) in survival of organisms exposed to culture water control and 1008 liquid phase of dredged material.. Therefore, it is concluded that the liquid phase ( of the dredged material is ecologically acceptable for oceanic discharge.) 3.1.2 Suspended Particulate Phase Bioassays ' Data produced by suspended particulate phase bioassays with copepods, mysid shrimp, and Atlantic silversides are presented in, respectively, Tables B4 , B5, and B6 (Appendix B) . All species were relatively resistant to the suspended par- ticulate phase, e.g. , mean survival of organisms exposed for 96 hr to 1008 phase was 80.0-90 .08 (copepods) , 83. 3-86 .7% (mysid shrimp) , and 86.7-93.38 (Atlantic silversides ) . 4 Analyses of survival data for copepods, mysid shrimp, and Atlantic silversides exposed for 96 hr to culture water bbb control and 1008 suspended particulate phase of dredged material are presented in Tables 4-6, respectively. Mean survival of all species exposed to culture water control was greater than 908, thereby allowing further analyses of data. 1Paragraph 28, page D13, Appendix D of the EPA and COE manual for dredged material (U.S. EPA and U.S. Army COE, 1977 ) specifies that "when no differences are detected between control and test survival after 96 hr, the analysis may be considered complete at this point with no indication of potential impact of the liquid (or suspended particulate) phase if the proposed disposal operation occurs. " Thus , further analyses relating to LC50 ' s and associated confidence intervals , LPC ' s, and environmental concentrations of the phase are not warranted. r -12- TeDle 4. Analysis of survival data for copepods, Acartia tonsa, exposed for 96 hr to A culture water, control .and 1008 suspended particulate phase of dredoed material Step. 1. Survival Data (From Table B4) Number of Survivors Treatment (t) : Culture Dred ed9 Water Dredged Dredged i Replicate (r) Ml - Material - Material - Control Sample A Sample B Sample C 1 ._. ._. 9 9 10 9 2 10 9 8 3 10 6 30 9 g Mean (x): 9.6 7(96.7%) 8.00(80.09) 9.00(90.08) 9.00(90.09) ) Step 2. Cochran's Test for Homogeneity of Variances of Survival Data Number of Survivors Treatment (t) Mean (z) Variance(s2) Culture Water Control 9.67 0.33 Dredged Material - Sample A 8.00 3:00 Dredged Material - sample B 9.00 1.00 Dredged Material - Sample C 9.00 1.00 s2(max. 3.00 C(cal.) '- rs2 5.33 0.56 ns, as compared to: - C(tab.) 0.77 for a 0.05, k + 4, and v + 2 Step 3. Parametric One-Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) of Survival Data Sum of Mean Source of Variation df Squares Square F(cal.) Treatment (Culture Water Control, t-1-3 4.25 1.42 1.06 ns, ti Dredged Material Sample A, as compared Dredged Material - Sample B, to F(cab.) Dredged Material - sample_ C) 4.07 for a - 0.05, numerator Error t(r-1)-8 10.67 1.33 df - 3, and denominator Total • tr-1+11 14.92 df - 8 _ . _ -13- Table S. Analysis of survival data for mysid shrimp, Neomysis americana, exposed for 96 hr t culture water Control and 100% suspended particulate pnese of dre gen material Step 1. Survival Data (From Table 85) ' Number of Survivors b Treatment (t): Culture Dredged Water DredgedDredged Replicate (r) Material - Material Control Sample A Material p Sample 8 Sample C 1 9 7 3 10 10 8 9 _ 10 9 8 8 9 Mean Ix):- 9.67(96.71) 8.67(86.7%) 8.33(83.36 8.67(86:7%) Step 2. Cochran'sTest for Homodeneit of Variances of Survival Data ! "A Number of Survivors Treatment (t) Mean (x) Variance(S2) Culture Water Castrol 9.67 0.33 Dredged Material Sample A 8.67 2.33 Dredged Material -, Sample 8 8.33 0.33 Dredged Material Sample C 8.67 0.33 - - - -��.. - - - - - - - - - - - - C(cal.) s2 maz.. 2.33' Fs2 3.32 ` 0.70 ns, . as Compared to: C(tab,) 0.77 for a • o.05, k • 4, and v 2 Step 3. Parametric Ona-w..Anal sis of Variance (ANOVA) Of Survival Data Source of VariationSum of Mean df Squares Square F Treatment (Culture Water (cal.) Dredged Material - SampleCAntrol, t-1.3 3.00 1.00 1.20 ns, Dredged Material - Sample 8, as compared Dredged Material - Sample C) to F(tab. ) 4.007 for a 0.05, Crroc t(r-1)•8 6,67 numerator -• .. 0.83 df • 3, and Total tr-1.11 9,67 denominator df 8 —14— Survival data for the three species (Tables 4 , 5, and 6 ) indicate no statistically significant differences (a = 0.05.) !- in survival of organisms exposed to culture water control and �d 1008 suspended particulate phase of dredged material. Therefore, it is concluded that the suspended particulate phase of the dredged material is ecologically acceptable for oceanic discharge. t 3.2 Solid Phase Bioassays Solid phase- bioassays, unlike liquid and suspended particulate phase tests, are analyzed almost exclusively according to statistical techniques. The concepts of prelim- inary comparison of survival of control and test animals, LC50's and related confidence intervals, quantitative LPC' s, and models of environmental fate of discharged material are not applicable. Data generated by solid phase bioassays with grass y. shrimp, hard clams, and sandworms are presented in Table B7 B . Mean(Appendix ) e n survival of organisms exposed for 10 days to dredged material was 85.0-93.08 (grass shrimp) , 92.0-97.08 (hard clams) , and 89.0-92.08 (sandworms ) . Analysis of total,. -(combined) survival data for the three species exposed for 10 days to control (culture) sediment, reference (disposal-site) sediment, and the solid phase of the dredged material is presented in Table 7. Mean survival of control organisms was greater than 908, thus allowing evaluation of data from tests with reference sediment and y dredged material. These data exhibited homogeneous variances (Cochran's test) , thereby permitting a parametric one-way ANOVA to be performed with nontransformed data. The ANOVA -16- Table 7, Analysis oI total (combined) survival data for grass shrimp Aard deme .( Meme, a erencearia) , and sand wrens (Nereis virens) eaposedefore l0 sdayslto control (cul ture) s lneea'�� — _2_) , . reference ( isposal-site) sedlment, and so id Phase of dredged material Step 1. Total Survival Data (From Table 87) . Total Number of Survivors Treatment (t): Reference Rep Control (Disposal- * ate (Culture) Dredged Dredged tate (r) ) Sediment Material - Dredged Sediment Sediment Sample A Y.Samplel - Material - � 1 Sample B Sample C 59 56 = 59 57 55 1 54 56 I 3 59„ 1 54 55 56 S2 57 1 C 6 53 5 5 5e57 54 57 SS , 54 56 - Mean (i): 58.40(97.38) 55.80(93.08) 54.40(90.78) S5.80(53.08) 54.40(90.78) Step 2. Cochzan's Test for Homo eneit of Variances of Total Survival Data Number of Survivors Treatment (t) Mean (x) Variance(s2 ) Reference (Disposal-Site) Sediment 55.80 Dredged Material - Sample A 1.70 Dredged Material - SampleµB 54.40 0.30 55.80 1.20 Dredged Material - S,ample C . - 54.40 - - - - 3.30 3N1 C(cal.) s2(max. - 3.3C- - - - • - Fs2 6.50 0-51 ns, as compared to: C(tab.) ' .0.63 for a - 0.05, It - 4, and v - 4 ;r step 3. parametric One-I WaY Analysis of Variance ANOVA) of Total Surlival Data Source of Variationdf Sum of Mean Squares Square g Treatment (Reference Sediment, t-1- q F(cal.). a Dredged Material - Sample A, 3 9'80 3.27 2.0�1 ns, as compared 3i Dredged Material - Sample 8 Dredged Material - sample C) - at03FIq kor) a - 0.05 .[trot t(r-1)-16 26.00 1.63 numerator Totaldf - 3, and __-- `- "- tr-1-19denominator 35.80 df - 16 —17— Indicates no. statistically significant difference ( a = 0.05) In survival of animals exposed to reference sediment and dredged material . Therefore, is is concluded that the solid phase of the dredged material is ecologically acceptable for discharge to the Boston Dump Site.1 .A 1. `y b� J Vit{ S i 1 p;, �M. ll' f1 (�1,f 1Paragraph 37, page F17, Appendix F of the EPA and COE manual for dredged material (U.S. EPA and U.S. COE, 1977) states that a 'solid phase has "real potential for causing environmentally unacceptable impacts on benthic organisms (only if] difference in mean survival between animals in the control and test sediments is statistically significant and t [emphasis added] greater than 10 percent. " 18 APPENDIX A LABORATORY PROCEDURES FOP. PREPARING DREDGED MATERIAL AND CONDUCTING BIOASSAYSI Date/Time Certifications of Performance of Procedure of Implemen- tation of Aquatic Laboratory Division Procedure Procedure Toxicologist Director Director h 1. Store control sediment (C (CS) , reference sediment CS11/5/79 (RS), and 3 samples of dredged sediment (DS) RS 11/1/79 • at 2-4' C in separate containers. Mix sedi- DS 10/30/79 " Ment in each container as thoroughly as possible. Solid-phase Bioassays Bioassays must be initiated by November 13, 1979 (2 weeks after October 30, 1979, earliest date of sediment collection). Do not be concerned with sophisticated photoperiod. , - Maintain dissolved oxygen in aquaria at >4 ppm, Cover aquaria to prevent salinity changes. 2. Remove CS and RS from storage and wet sieve through 1-mm mesh into separate containers. Use minimum volume of RS 11/2 0800 artificial sea water (ASW) of salinity CS 11/6 0800 + 30 ppt for sieving pur- poses. place nonliving material remaining on sieve in appropriate containers. 3. Nix CS and RS in respective containers RS 11/2 0900 and allow to settle for 6 hr. CS 11/6 0900 4. Decant ASW and mix RS 11/2 1500 CS and RS as thoroughly as possible. CS 11/6 1500 5. Assign treatments - -. (CS, RS, 3 samples of DS) and replicates (5 r per 11/7 0800 + treatment) to aquaria. 6. Randomly position aquaria (25) in environ- mental chamber maintained T at 20a1'C. 11/7 0800 - • + J This document is. a copy of the work sheet that was used during the evaluation. The document differs from the work sheet in that dates/times appear in typed form and certifications were added at a single time after the dates/times were typed-. J Laboratory Procedures (Continued) Cate/Time Certifications of Performance of Procedure Of Implemen- tation -of Aquatic Procedure Procedure Toxicolo Laboratory ist Division 9• Director - Director 11. During acclimation Period, remove appro- priate volumes of 3 samples of DS from storage and vet-sieve 11/8 0900 ' eacb sample through - + 1-•m mesh into separate �— Containers. 'Use,minimum volume of ASW for sieving purpose 8. Place nonliving material remaining on sieves In eontalners.-� ' 15- Mix-3 samples of DS In respective containers - - anhrallow:to-,settle for __D930 16.. Decant.ASW and mix - 3 Samples of DS as thoroughly as possible. 11/8 1530 - - + - ---- 17. Place 15 mm of appro— pr ate sample of OS in all : . ,. but control and reference .--- aquaria. Employ basic11/_ 9_ 0900__ strategy identified an n Step F. 18. Remove remaining CS and, . RS from storage.- -Warm-.to test temperature. (20f1'C) - Add 15 mm of CS to-control equarium.,and..15 mm of RS ,,, - to reference aquarium. 11/9 0930 + Employ basic strategy identified in Step S. - 13. Replace 75% of ASW 1 hr after addition of - 3 samples of DS and final addition of CS 11/_ 9�_ and RS.,, , 20. Select 500 grata - shrimp from holding tank and randomly distribute 11/9 1200 into 25 finger bawls.. ;r ft " A Laboratory Procedures (Continued) Date/Time Certifications of Performance of Procedure �,. of Implemen- tation of Aquatic Laboratory Division Procedure Procedure Toxicologist Director Director • :Suspended-Particulate-Phase eioassays Bioassays must be initiated by November 13, 1979 (2 weeks after Octooer 30, �?`�%'.+;,•h, f 1979, date of dredged-sediment collection). Maintain 14-hr light photoperiod �) with cool-white fluorescent bulbs mounted approximately 0.5-1 m above tops of Yts, aquaria. Maintain dissolved oxygen in aquaria at >4 ppm. Cover aquaria to �_ +,;• prevent salinity changes. I4. Prepare .3 suspended-Particulate-phase samples. Follow procedures in sa Appendix B of EPA/CCE - sIsplasentation Manual. z'in particulars Fix gni. a Clean laboratory - `' - glassware thoroughly 10/31-11/13 " e Aeawve from storage + ' appropriate volumes of 3 samples of DS. _Co_o_s� od •• Mix each.sample as 10/3171/8 w w, thoroughly as possi- ble. Combine with Msid s}+rimp ••�� •-': ASN in !t4 ratio by 30 31-11 S volume. Shake on - >'� ' automatic shaker for Silverside - - -:{' : 70 min at 100 'oscilla- 10/31-IM/8 _ • + tions/min. Do not allow dissolved oxygen to reach zero. Settle for 1 hr. Collect supernatant. 25. sus Begin ended= 9 P particulate-phase bioassays as-soon as Cooepod 11/8 • + sufficient suspended- -- - particulate phase is Mysid shrimo 11/5 - prepared. Store . initial volumes of Silverside. 11/8 " suspended particulate phaseat2-4'C. Com- - bine all volumes prior to use in bioassays. . 26. For each species tested (copepod', mysid shrimp, and Atlantic "'Copepod 11/8 silverside, assign treatments (culture- Mysid shrimo 11/5 water control (1008 A5571J 10%, 50%, 100% Silverside 11/8 suspended particulate , phase of each sample of _ DS) and replicates (3 r per treatment) to aquaria/ crystallizing dishes. �}�..., Laboratory Procedures (Continued) .jt,Sl..`.,.. Date/Time Certifications of Performance of procedure ..Y,.F , of Zmplemen- T Cation re Aquatic Laboratory Division Procedure Procedure nr Toxicologist Director Director gyp: l 1r >j �`k�� ' '. Liquid-Phase Bioassays �.• ' - /icaleays must be initiated by November 13, 1979 (2 weeks after October 30, 1979, date of dredged-sediment collection) . Maintain 14-hr light pnotoperiod with Cool-white fluorescent bulbs mounted approximately Maintain dissolved oxygen in aquaria at >4m.Cvabove t Cover aquariatopraquaria. event salinity changes. ►repara 3 liquid-phase aa+ples. follow procedures Swti` In Appndlx 8 Ot fP e A/COE tsylementaglon Manual. In „ kmsA.1particylaci + Clean laboratory 7'.Cp`:it.: Olaasvace, filtration 10,pme't, and filters; 10/30-11/13 + 4,: Remove from storage --- - Iq] :_ a ropriate volumes s�•o .e.;r.:. Of 1 samples of DS. MIs each sample as %e4•� .<: thoroughly as pos- � ,gy:. ,.: slbie. Combine with A" In lt4 ratio by Cooke o�d - volume. Shake on 1/1 7-11/13 automatic shaker car _ stlu •�, 30 min at 100 ascii- N sid shrimo :-. latlOns/min. Do not 1 7-11 3 allow dtsaolved oxygen ;. :+•&f to reach seta. .Settle Silverside for 1 hr. Collect 7-1 =3 + +� supernatant and filter 'if a (Centrifugation may be - - -kf ";t., employed If needed to - sj?;� rV expedite filtration - procesa). Discard first 30 at of filtrate passed through each filter. Collect-remainder of x s• filtrate. y r . a 12. login liquid phase bloataays as soon as Cooeood 11/13 " sufficient liquid phase Is prepared. Store Mysid shrimo 11/13 Initial volumes of liquid phase at 2-4'C. Combine Silverside 11/13 " �! All volumes prior to use in bioassays. 33. for each species tested (copepod, mysid •,�;: shrimp, and Atlantic Copepod 11/13 silverside, assign tratments (culture-water Mysid shrimo 11/13 Control 1100% ASH); 10%, SOC, 100% liquid phase - Silverside 11/13 of each sample of DS) and replicates (3 r per treatment) to aquaria/ Crystallizing dishes. - ' �¢''�• Laboratory Procedures (Continued) Date/Time Certifications of Performance of Procedure :; .. of Implemen- tation .of Aquatic Laboratory Division Procedure Procedure Toxicologist Director Director v.r�^ 34. dor each species Copepod 11/13 tested, randomly position aquacia/crystallizing Hysid shrimp 11/13 dishes In environmental chamber maintained at Silverside 11/13 20+1"C. )S. Establish appropriate Copepod 11/13 concentrations of control { water and liquid phase Mysid shrimp 11/13 of each sample of DS in �. '2. aquaria/crystalling Silverside 11/13 dishes. 36. Randomly distribute Covepod . 11/13 " 10 individuals of each species Into eechMysid shrimp- 11/13 aquarium/crystpllizing " dish. Cover aquaria/ Silverside 11/13 " dishes. 37. monitor the following- - vaciablest At start and end of -hr testing period s salinity, Copepod 11/13 " temperature, Start _ dissolved of Mysid shrimp 11/13 " oxygen, and test pH in each Silverside 11/13 aquarium% crystallizing. Copepod 11/17 I dish (record End in log book). of Mysid shrine 11/17 test Silverside 11/17 " 1 During 96-hr testing period r • Survival Start of X . " (record test (0 hr) in log book) ' 4 hr - X " 6 hr X 24 hr X " 48 hr X 72 hr X " End of test ,(96 hr) X \ ^ APPENDIX ��. gnauly ± b b assay-re Ian d. data are presented according `� be following s�_nc liquid phase bioassays, suspended § f` � yParticulate phase bioassays, and solid phase bioassays. p «3 � t . . . . . . / \ - ! � . . I � � Table B1. Results of liquid phase bioassays with copepods , ., Acartla tonsaa � ;' Treatment Repli- Number of Survivors (Exposure cate X 'pja, Condition) (r) 0 hr 4 hr 8 hr 24 hr 48 hr 72 hr 96 hr Culture water 1 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 control 2 10 14a 10 10 10 9 9 3 10. 10 10 10 10 9 9 iMean (x) : 9. 33 ( 93.38) 10% liquid phase i Dredged 1 10 10 10 10 10 9 8 material - 2 10 10 10 10 10 9 g Sample A 3 10 10 10 10 9 9 8 } � r. Dredged 1 10 10 10 10 10 9 ' 8 .'-. material - 2 10 10 10 10 9 9 8 ` ,. . Sample B 3 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Dredged 1 10 10 10 10 10 10 ZO material - 2 10 10 . 10 10 10 7 5 Sample C 3 10 10 10 10 10 10 9 j r r n 50% liquid phase •`,< q Dredged-9 1 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 material - 2 10 10 10 10 6 5 5 Sample A e p 3 10 10 10 10 9 9 9 Dredged 1 10 10 10 10 10 10 9 material - 2 10 10 10 10 10 9 g Sample B 3 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Dredged 1 10 10 10 10 9 9 9 material - 2 10 10 10 10 9 8 8 Sample C 3 10 10 10 10 8 7 7 Table B1 . (Continued) Treatment Repli- Number of Survivors (Exposure cate Condition) (r) 0 hr 4 hr 8 hr 24 hr 48 hr 72 hr 96 hr 1008 liquid phase a Dredged 1 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 material - 2 10 10 10 10 10 9 8 Sample A 3 10 10 10 10 9 9 5 Mean 7. 67 (76.78) Dredged _.� 10 - 10 10 9 9 9 _ 6 material 2 10 10 , Sample B .3 10 10 19 19 19 19 18 Mean (x) : 8.00 (80 .08) Dredged 1 10 10 10 10 9 9 9 material 2 10 10 10 10 10 10 9 Sample C 3 10 10 10 10 10 9 5 Mean (x) : 7. 67 (76.78 ) aBioassays were conducted at 20+1"C in 200-m1 crystallizing dishes. A 14-hr light (1200 uw/cmrat surface of dishes) and 10-hr dark photoperiod was maintained with cool-white fluorescent bulbs. Test media were not aerated. Dissolved oxygen concentrations in the media ranged from 6.7-7.1 ml/1 at the start of the bioassays to 5.4-7.0 ml/1 at the end of the tests. pH varied from 8.1-8. 4 (start of bioassays) to 8.0-8.5 (end of bioassays) . Salinity was maintained at .30 ppt. ,F• '.Table B2. Results of liquid phase bioassays with m sid shrimp, { 9M� N4 Vote americanaa y ;. 4Yeatment Repl i- Number of Survivors (Exposure cate " Condition) (r) 0 hr 4 hr 8 hr 24 hr 48 hr 72 hr 96 hr rCulture water 1 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 K . contro 2 10 10 10 10 10 10 9 3 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Mean (x) : 9. 67 ( 96. 78) "l0% liquid phase -Dredged 1 10 10 10 9 8 8 8 material - 2 10 . 10 10 10 10 10 10 Sample -A 3 10 10 10 10 10 .0 10 ,; :N.• h ' Dredged terial - 2 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Sample B 3 10 10 9 9 9 9 9 NDredged 1 10 10 10 9 9 8 8 s f' material - 2 10 10 10 10 10 10 t}k;•• Sample C 3 10 10 10 1010 10 10 10 �.� 509 liquid phase x P, Dredged 1' 10 10 10 10 9 9 9 � , ;waw material 2 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 ' Sample A 3 10 10 10 10 10 10 8, a, Dredged 1 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 material - 2 10 10 10 10 10 10 9 Sample B 3 10 10 9 9 9 9 9 LV 4'l Dredged 1 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 material - - -.2 10 10 10 10 10 9 g Sample C 3 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 .irt TAble B2. (Continued) 1wti"f[6atment Re li- Number of Survivors (Bxposure cate :" Condition) (r) A hr 4 hr 8 hr 24 hr 48 hr 72 hr 96 hr �Oil 1 (auid phase ar:dyed : 1 10. 10 10 10 10 10 10 --terlal - 2 10 10 10 10 10 10 9 •'; Su►ple, A 3 10 10 10 10 10 9 9 Mean (x) : 9.33 ( 93.3$) M $w Dredged 1 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 � astorial 2 10 10 9 9 9 9 9 �; Saaple B 3 10 10 10 9 9 9 9 Mean •(x) :- 9.33 (93 .3%) ns ;Dredged 1 10 10 10 10 10 9 8 naterial - 2 10 10 10 9 9 9 9 *Saxple. C 3 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Mean (x) : 9.00 '(90.08) aeioassays were conducted at 20+1°C in 200-m1 crystallizing '.:dishes. Animals were fed live 48-hr7old Artemia (brine shrimp) nauplii 'at a rate of -1 ml of culture/dish day. A 14-hr light ='(4.1200 yw/cM2 at surface of dishes) and 10-hr dark photoperiod was Palntained with cool-white fluorescent bulbs. Test media were not "toted, Dissolved oxygen concentrations in the media ranged from 6.7-7.2 ml/1 at the start of the bioassays to 6.0-6. 9 ml/1 'at the end Of the tests* pH varied from 8.0-8.4 (start of bioassays) to 8.0-8. 3 . ' (andof bioassays) : Salinity was maintained at 30 ppt. t ger.`..'.: : l\y YY 5 Y•c�-t P 4 S-• B ':nista a. • Table 83. Results of^ liquid phase bioassays with Atlantic ' •811Vsrsides, Henidia menid•iaa � ,;, ',?reatmant Repli- Number of Survivors tgxposure- --sate !'Condition) (r) 0 hr 4 hr 8 hr 24 hr 48 hr 72 hr 96 hr -lture water 1 10 10 8 8 8 (C°n,tro 2 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 3 10 10 10 10 10 9 9 n � Mean (x) : 9.00 (90 . 08) - 4 0 liquid Phase Dredged 1 10 10 10 10 - - - 7 9 8 2 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 6.:.. Sample A 3 10 10 10 10 9 8 g •,: Dr ed 1 1 0 10 10 10 r.. 10 10 10 - mat � trial 2 10 10 9 g g 7 7 Sample 8 3 10 10 10 1 10 0 10 10 ."-'`'Dredged 1 10 10 10 10 9 8 8 day material - 2 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Sample .0 3 10 1.0 9 9 9 8 8 50% liquid .phase _ ay.Dredged 1 10. 10 10 10 10 10 10 material - 2 10 10 10 9 9 g g arIf -Sample .A 3 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Dredged 1 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 material - 2 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 �r. Sample 8 3 10 10 10 10 to 10 10 �0. : Dredged 1 .10 10 10 10 9 9 9 �i material - 2 10: 10 10 10 10 10 10 Sample C 3 10 10 10 10 10 9 9 f � a!•s �' j I,. rQ Dys i, • p Ilk T a r., ).WU ��tt'•j�1! � 1 1 1 Y-�'* �• ; <ti�t��,47w •.. , 1 1 1 • +py �K p����Y -• 1 1 1 1 1 1 .•"a I f_ + fiy 1 l � .�i�;�•r3 ��=; 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +1•n , �+F* r'- r Cyt x �Dy , n '}�+•T p`s �h �6 4. P'Y $$ ^yn+�iay. �.• �� 1 �i 1001 r a1�y 7 tf r g, .} ya-• 1 1 1 i 1 �� }s � � C'�a�a•w 7;i J: t• � �r� i r c>� JY r`2 S r;,uF ix�A�fF. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 fl�yL� ���i�••7 -� i._.fir 7hm4•a,P� q4r ' �,fsr')�v L�f 1 ' 1 1 - • • • Ctd��.•Ar`Gr- ��.,q1E� rNxk �y r''}/ }y C� #` h r• rte. 1 r. Yf „ Mira .,elsil, �6 •• • 1 'a Al 4��«eS�'�fJx • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 .r4ij`b✓�1s4 a V i.f, n 'i��`�• 1 1 I 1 a;Y�?;t;�• .olr,. e,z: �a d"cf �'r•M i �ix • yol f s� r'Sx��4aTVl' J ,�;•5'v rda''�5'' Nr� t f f 1 KMl , {p� .D•4 � .R All 1• 437„in' iS �' �E i ���iX• —," 1 1 1 • JY TYat i� f•q3�. '. 1 1 �?�y��,•n ti1T.�r. 1 1 1 • , id��k r� •,/�RSi 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 vh( fr ,y J.'� ct� � �•F ty{'y uY � • 11 aill!Jhk��{1 - - • • • • TA ti�J`.'L��� 1��•F ic. 1 a TFT•ugfY�.i }/.,.ry��[p r' Si' r �n�rY2�.wV�.a wFj..l • Or p' _ a.: 1Yr �c. i'f, s 'S -+t�i e ! " 3 r•i�.'`. �F."f.'°sar9-t' -�,' iJt�:e t� a.?rw�t -3 '. R < ♦'��t<+ � C . ! 7 v 1 s� ..LP a" Ij 6r �� 4 } T s j ! z .ar 4 Si -.R ♦ .•uJ'i` .1 .r ^.: isF. t r ) .1. � •}2+ t , .y -�_yr. !. r '!'L. 2 i u f +^ "Y ,1J,. k 4 v. ♦ H �� t✓c(�i.� v � t 1y, ,�> � f''� F�.,+i - •:,i .. i i -t a � +S . ��`-•fZ"^d`y1 3^ t`4�k {.` 'Y� wS�.r"�P�< �f� � `15 �!'.:` .��'"7'.n,y., +: �'F '�`'. .'z �'t .c $ !'�. <a a "t 5." !4 aE� 'a!'�'J'I -r .Ni+; ? -�'Y i ♦ rff o +•b �R. 7 y' ..•.Q �. �y '�H S"r"i'4.4.1 r.s''�i.v L ,� n' t r , ;,4 R . •.! ! r S«' l �r M 1 �.3�$ Y, ♦s..lT.'�1 �t �N4 C AY'.lnf�(r F ` g � .2 r �•._r'YCt�,�F ��< 4 - .yC.i�' 1 wt�z�r`r'+r 1ts' S b hw.. X i � ry.s, �. "^EI:T 'ai r r � _ „r it ^Sh to ,C!r t'-kt r4ygy+a toy •.iK Y S r Q +,��v Y' r ;a'.i Y�'` j f �r i Ki f v y...YT. *`l Ta# 'lV.._-a' � _ � _- M,`�. t Tacc �k�'"i��W"�tit:l i !X' \L+.r(.�a.!^SYy-•�yti:� "siF� t1 T �r 3 '��i1f� --b z. .L x.r 1. ., te,r'C�✓ a i1[ i y ✓' 1 � s•< � � Py.. �.,;y .. ! ! ! . `� y •l ix�-- -!,� ^�.�: .' A"e �•iiyC ;z*' wrc*' T.Y. A.n .=�' P+•2.'- -..<n i,•;_l. M% -Pesti ,,., -•v;;..:%.r. ,tip "n= c s. �� :/} r - •��flF T C 13jy •� MIS, Flot. /•R�Ms" tY 'Y���� + '� � 4rt'{` 's .13'•.!V �, r� �S`-�' .F�..Ji�{e4.. '�Nr�r'Y'?" - .'F "5� �'Y�f � �� � i � X n '�i��� �F y - � a a . ..:n y .•ti. � �� t... N g �.LL7'- r '"4 r . r. t \MS .� . '' ,. _. Ta61• tll• Camt{a�Mt -'��1�'t 4.•`C',r.n,y.,,•ti ��!'3 ' �y..,! r ..i. e:. 4 .n�` sy.. 1 t',v„ -4'•.� r3:/f ���,��, ^ �theGlr Ot Setr{eOfe des 4� .r. '+i�,, T• .•..4'1 ..�ys.r' 'YS�Sj-Q,,:3��6 "^r Y.-` Treatment � - (t)T Dredged Material -. Sampte A Dredged Material -, Sample a Dredged material - Sample C Replicate Grass Hard Sand-. Grass Hard Sand- Grass. Hard Sand- (r) Shrimp Clams worm$ Total Shrimp Clams . worms Total Shrimp Clams worm Total 1 16 20 1B 54 17 20 17 51 17 20 19 56 " 2 18 19 18 55 19 20 17 56 17 18 17 52 3 19 17 19 55 -18 . 19 19 56 1s 18 17 53 4 19 17 18 54 19,. '18 20 57 17 19 39 55 . 5 18 19 17 54 20 20 6 16 20 20 56 5 16 Mean (x) 18..00 1.8.40 18.00. 54.40 18.60 19.40 17.60 55.80 17.00 19.00 18.40 54.40 (t) (90.0) (92.0)' (90.0) (90.7) (93.0) (97.0) (89.0) (93.0) (85.0) (95.0) (92.0) (90.7) $Bioassays (30-day tests) were conducted at 20+1* C in 38-1 aquaria. Organisms were exposed to each replicate aqua[ia was exchanged by the replacement, as compared to the flow- of a treatment in a single aquarium. Water in through, method and was aerated. A 14-hour light and 10-hr dark photoperiod was maintained with cool-white fluorescent bulbs. Minimum values of dissolved oxygen and pH recorded during the bioassays were 1.5 ml/t and 7.1, respectively. - Aeration was increased immediately after low levels of dissolved oxygen were noted. Salinity was maintained at 30 ppt. bTwenty (20) individuals of each species were initially exposed to each replicate of a treatment. Thus, a total of 60. animals was employed in each aquarium. oln addition to monitoring survival of all species, burrowing behavior of sandworms was noted at 2-day intervals. No differences were observed among aquaria. r r U.S. STANDARD SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES U.S.STANDARD SIEVE NUMBERS HYDROMETER 100 6 1 3 21 I } } 3 4 6 3 10 14 16 20 30 40 50 70 100 140 200 '.. 90 1111 IT I10 I 1 20 � I I 4D 3 ei 70 I I - > .0349' 30 III rIl ! I , II 1 , m i t I -1--�- I I !� 1 ' III ! I m W � I I i I11f1 , II , I I. W ! I � ! '- - --- - I II ' i I I I I � � 60 i.�.i. �.:i 70 20 I I I IE(�L �en - - _ ♦ Z P� ~I I I - I ' ! I BO 90 O ! I=7- loo 500 P - tooO.OS 0.01 0.005 - 0.001 / GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS C68BLES GRAVEL SAND cans[ turf waxsL Ircaux nxE SILT OR CLAY Sample No. I Ete-or Depth - ClassiTitz6on - Nat w% LL PL PI .'24,. // 7 7 LJ Proec�t � �el �R✓6�/ S Arei. —.__—_—_- _.--_-- Boring No. " /'�.1�_:;•,�i r.,�9•,�• GRADATION CURVES Dare e ENG 1 MAY ORM 2087 \ r.. -------- U- --U S STANDARD SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES 100 6 4 3 2 1 1 U S STANDARD SIEVE NUMBERS 3 4. 6 610 1416 20 30II 4050 70 IW 140 20090 HYDROMETER 10 80 I ° I I I - � I 70 ,oa9/ I w -I i w 3 °°so fill 3 50 rc 40 I-I-j_.I..l ..#.-• --, - I III ! I I t I ! E0 yz, 30 I I I ,_ I i rc if 20 1 TO r I r I I I I f 'Meso I ! r r I r 10 90 500 100 50 10 s l •- 0.5 r _ GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS pE 0'� 0.01 0.005 100 COBBLES GRAVEL 0.001 �A� Rnt SAND - NaA56 MIDUM RMe SILT OR CLAY Sample No. Ekr or Depth Dlassi6olioA not w0. S LL Pl. Prpled Ana- GRADATION CURVES o^^_De ENGRORM 2O8I Date MAY as U.S STANDARD SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES U.S STANDARD SIEVE NUMBERS 0 6 4 3 2 1 1 1 3 4 6 6 10 14 16 20 30 40 50 70 100 140 100 HYDROMETER 90 100 1 so 1 D . , � 8 i I D ra .ossU I 20 i IIi: I 70 30 u60 I j L I i do 3 tI ' � so ao I I t+�-� It 60 30 I I I I I a 70 I 20 I I I VL 2 /� i /, o I r i I I i I S1 II I '� LL BO 10 ! I I 90 0 I'I j I i ! I ' I I I SOO 100 '.SO / 1 0 !00 .5 QOS 0.01 0.005 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS COBBLES GRAVEL SAND EWRSE ^"C mum Wolum 'r,"( SILT OR CLAY Sample N4 I (der Or De It Classification - Nat w% LL PL ___..:+._ _ _�_ T.o_Sr �t� ��QVr�.L^?1L, C, 1.� i l3S•� OD .5�. P3 Peen_..:^ %2n+ �/-i CJr i� '_t S - ---- ------—— --.—__ - —_ Ned- — --�--- _ — — __-- Boring Na rC ji . ,�..... I.`i il.. :).,>) _��• GRADATION CURVES nate ENG , M;;;, 2087 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . W W o o a rc e w0 1 N • • • . • • . • . . • • • • . • • . . . • • . • • . . • . • • • • • • . • • • • . O � W . • . . . • • • • • • • • • • • • . I r J\O T!1 O v) oN n0 � Q - r2 r0 OOOnO y9QN O C < U w p a N J MW 1 1 .n t00 • • �1 Ow '< W OOON •09nMQ •N •! a •q I dro 'nn m I n ao � Ll w .0. o n.n M 02U r 2 •• - •- P ww¢oa " ' • • • . . • • . • • • . . . • . . . . • • • • . • . . .• • • . • . . • • • • . • • . `. • • . . • • . • . • . • . • • . • • • . • • • • • • • • . • . . . • • . Z 87 W I O m i O J N 1 ro • K P. >- P • • • • • • . • • • • • . W W p O r O w • • • . • . . . . . • . . . • • . • • . • . . • . . • • • • . . • • . . W n t • J O K 4 z q Z W W • OO h .-.1 .1- 0 2 O M W N O O w F of r • • • . . • • • . • • • . O 1 • . • . • . . • • . . • • • .. .. _.. .. . r r O •• N tw O 1l1Pn . =� t O oe M ONS. O rHOCC Y\NVI O O'• ' 'G r0 - OOOmJ\ QNw O _, MW t t . . •a 100 •• • Nw YW OOOw OL .•C\a NNJ\ Q o - a In o. w a •.:.. O O n 4\ M :O S K .• '• P wY Ow - o • . . . . • . . . .. . • ... • • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .a +Nno'J1 .On m •N nY N On O.•NMQ IfaOn mP mM wp O mQ O�•1\! n 4PO wN O 0 0 CO O C v .w ry N N N N N N N N N M M M M M M M Q D C Q Q Q•1\V: Y vvv..•v.. .. ...vv.... .,,�.,,•,,•..v•.v•.r v....va. vv...v.• .. v...�v.. O m Y = a _ J 20 fPW 0 0 .. s ¢.o o w w ..,.• � i r S t] Y W Z O I t 1 • W LLL o • • Ur � 2 0 W W W•. IODU - O o a •O •� Q'N .• JS (- K S Lt¢ S OO I J •+ ....m i 02 04 O 9 [ J•1 U O7'> 17 \lyO HK • 7 N > r 2ul + t 1 R U r G./UUU • > C•-w W G f l-w ... _ > • 1 7 •1 UU 7-.> < \ \ 4• � UwL U N .S l9 J Zr OU JC] •d UU O J NN NLL mK NmWay W•• � i i wT 's .t 7 p O 71 i •+O yl WOO aqO Www O yViNNN1Uww Jw T p JI w.. yO'Y�:J_I U Y .- 00 > N 6: •I Y•. w.-.LL 2J a1- ..N. d u d C. TA A' q JJV.m Nww \ " UU rc .�w•-•'� V) 4 o "� .J W W J •''U w,JI I .y•- ww •l J UU O N JO^�". V 2 12 .0 r •kO JJ«. Z T 2 Uwa w.- •- J7w UM C. +• U Jd O. wU 7U T J W� NUU U JJw ww NT 7a:h U U w i)l] • Y.L ). r .-• J f • �• 'i H J •'. 1.U w.a Y Y r q' _• v J w t f k f]L Y •1 P o f .' v V U i)r.. O a v yl rl .y l.W U O Y IY ]: :r Y. 0— J _f d W 1 W m uI . 16 r •.MJ JUU a. 0. U l a> a� .pyU l•.UN I• / J0. d of [ 01 N✓i ' 1 ,r I• POuG of 901U3D0801 ��. � � 9O1TOM SEOIMEN4 SAMPLE TEST RESULTS' NCS nEDtO-6 • _ PAGEI 79-CMA05- 02 STATUS AS OF 07 DEC 79 ,. 19-CHAOS SALEM MAR8OR - YEAR- 1979 STATE- MA , TIQAL SYS- ME COM/kEC- C % VOL SOLIDS- EPA 51) 01 02 - c03 04 05 •1 . . • . 12.9 i VOL SOL IDS- NED ($B) 10,9 9.12 % TOT VOL SOL-EPA (59) . , , , , , • , PPM CHEM OXYGEN DMND (60) • , , , 203000.0 , , , , , , 176000,0 , PP+ TUT KJOL NIT (b1). _• • • 5000.0 • . • • , • r 5600.0 • �'i "K OIL • GREASE (b2) • • • • 6500.0 , , • , • • lb00,0 l ASN MEV-OOT (63) • • • • 1.5 • • 114 e s • , 1.2 P" LEA' (6n) ,R3, D00.0 ,R3, 370,0 a 160,0 , PPM ZINC (65) • •. . 320.,0 • • 300.0' 160,0 PPM L;SENlC (10) • • • ,.. 5.0 • . 12.0 • • .... ._ , 2.0 • .. .__. PWO 91SNUTM (71) • P.•n+ [AD4IUM (72) . • ..... . • • 5.0 • • 9,0 • • • • 4.0 .. PP CHRQ"IUM - (73) , • ,R3, 1200,0 •R3, 1200,0 • ,k3, 920,0 PP>• C0aPt9 (74) • • • . 100.0 • , 49,0 • . • . 56.0' PFM -I GnIkE ..._... (75) • . ... . ._ . ..... - , • . . • . _ .. • . .. ..... �._ GV r. NICKEL (76) • . 65,0 . ., 68.0 • . 08.0 PV- P-fl SPMORUS (77) • , • •,_. PPM SILVER - (78) PP TIN (79) • , _ , , PPM VANADIUM (BO) , ,R30 - 280.0 ,R3, 310,0 . . , .,k;_• 2.6_0,0 X CARSON (ORGANIC) (BS) • • ���� Y CARBON (CARBONATE) (86) • .• , . • , i CAR&ON (TOTAL) -(87) • _ .__.. •. X MY nROGEN - (88) • • �' • �• PPM BEVZENE 1 (90) P'Jl) PLYCNL BIPH ! (92) • • • • • • • • • , Ca.tBOx 19 (Yk$) (93) • _.. • • - - RADIOACTIVITY(MR/MR) (90 ,R2• • 11.0 • • , • -12.0; ALL TESTS, UNLESS OTHERWISE •TOTED, WERE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE %ITM THE EPA CHEMISTRY LAbORATORY. MANUAL• ALPAPKS- (R) ). ••- TEST WAS FOR 'MOISTURE CONTENT, % DRY MGT', NOT 'SED RDX POT' LEGEND( (R2)- RADIOACTIVITY BACXGROUND - 7 COUNTS/MINUTE (CIM) LI- LIMIT OF INSTRMI (k3)- VALUE EXCEEDS 2 STD DEVS FROM THE MEAN OF ALL GULF OF MAINE SAMPLES. NP- NON-PLASTIC (R9). - LT- LESS THAN (R$)- GT- GREATER THAN . , PkOG a; OOIU300801 BOTTOM SEDIPENf SAMPLE. TEST RESULTS` RCS NEDED•6 PAGE= 70-CHA05. 03 STATUS AS OF 07 DEC 79 R 79-CHAOS SALEM HARBOR + ,YEAR- 1979 STATE- MA TIDAL SYS- ME COM/RLC- C 06 07 Sta+;•No�A 08 09 LAc S,E?IAL NO, (01) . , 100-300-2 , 100-300-!30 EXPLORATION NO. (02) , , PE-3 • 100-300-3 . . 100-300.3 , SAMPLE NO. (03) . . T-1 4 • T-3 . ' • T-1 • , T-1 SAMPLE DEPT" (FT) (0 1.0-1.1T • • 0.0.2,05 , , 0,0-0,34 • , 1,0-1,17 • r LATITUDE (05) • • • . .. LONGI TUDE (06) • • • • •. • , • r CO-;ARD LOC-NORTH (07) , , , , 764,740 CU-CRD LOC-EAST (08) , , , , 554,150 SO:;NDIoG (11I • . 7.1 REDUCED SOUNDING-MLw (12) • -6.1 , DATE - "OUR (13) . . , • 4304-1415 rE>irER (l4) . . . • 03 . SE: STATE (1S) . . . 0 SECCHI DISC-BLACK (16) • 3.0 SLCCMI DISC-N"ITt (17) • • 7.1. . , ._ • • ... • • .. (20) • FINE SANDY (21) ORGANIC SILT (22) • (OM) KITH , , • , , , VISUAL (23) ,. • SMELL FRAGS, • . • , CLASSIFICATION (24) . .. . , �. -:.1 • , • _ .. •._�By (25) • , • , • • • • , , LABORATORY (26) , • • , •'. , - • • . . . - (27) SOIL CLASS/DOMIN (32) .._.. ' . , , .. ).;• • _ . . SOIL CLASS/SUB-OOMIN (33) , GRAIN SIZE CURvE-MED (34) 0.0185 • - , .• - i , GRAIN SIZE CURVE-01 (35) . , 0.055 . ., � • •{ , GRAIN SIZE CUkVE-03 (36) , , 0.0093 Sci COEF-(01/G3)••,5 2.4318 GR SIZE CURVE-% FINE (38) , • 81.00 NORMAI•/52MOOAL (39) .. • _• • 8 LIC.UID LIMIT (40) • 100 • . • , _ ', PLASTIC LIMIT (41) • • , . 52 , • • • • • . ' PLASTIC INDEX (42) • • . 48 . ' • • • , , - SPEC GPAv SOLIDS (47) 2.30 , • •ET UNIT -GT (PCF) (48) , • , • 79,04 • , -• • • , DRV UNIT •:GT (PCF) (49) 33,71 • . . , PE-:CENT SOLIDS (50) 49,00 , , , . 46,00 '• • 47,00 SEDIMENT PM (51 ) • • • • , 7.60 SED =Dx POT (MV) (52) •Rl• 134.300 • • , _. • ...._.. 1 PaDG a: 40IU300801 BOTTOM SEOIMENi SAMPLE TEST RESULTS• 1 RCS hEOED•b PA,-E3 7o.CHa05- 04 - STATUS 4S OF 07 DEC 79 - 79-CHA05 SALEM HARBOR _ _, YEAR- 1979 STATE- MA TIDAL SYS- ME COM/REC- C % VOL SDLIDS- EPA (57) •06 07 08• • • • • . 15.9 •09 10 • • • , Y YOL SOLICS- NED (58) . , % T (59) UT VOL SOL-EPI • • • • 8.82 r • • • ' PVP C, E4 OXYGEN DMND (60) ,R3. 280000,0 pV4 TO KJOL NIT - (61 ) . . . , 3100.0 , , • • • ' PPO UiL • GREASE (62) • , , 6300,0 P P,. MERCURY (63) 1,0 • 1.1 • 1.4 , PPM LEdO (64) , , 96,0 , . •R3• 390,0 ,R3. 400,0 P'" ZINC (65) . 100.0 • • . 260.0' • • 250.06 • , , PM% ARSENIC .... . ... .. P P.. AIS"UTH (71) 7.0• . • 6.0 , 11•p ; . .. . :PM CaDM[uH (72) 3.0 . . . 4.0 • 2,0 Pw• C-R •UmIuH (73) . 520,0 ,R3•• 780.0 , 500.0 , PPr COPPER (74) . . 3e.0 . • • • 97,0 , , 94.0 • , PPP IODTNE (75) , PPM NICKEL • •._ .._.. _ • ,. • . _... -_._..._.._ - - -- PP•+ P•• (77) 38.0 . , 53.0 • • 3u.0 Pp- SILVER (7A) , • ._ . . . • • • . . PPM TIN (79) . • , • • , • • . • , PPM VANADIUM (80) 93,0 , • 170,0 • • 150,0- % CAR?DN (ORGANIC) (85) i .. ....... .__.�*.. . . ._. __...... .__ _ .. • , . • , X CARBON (CARBONATE) (86) • . . • • . . _ • . - . % CA�_8ON (TOTAL). - (P7) . ..._.. X -YOAQGEN (88) , : ., - - • • - X NITROGEN (89) • • •.. • PFM PENZENE , (90) - - PM? PLYCML BIPH (92) . . . . . . . . . _ . CAR50N 14 (YRS) (93) , -. .._.. . •_ • , _ _ • • _ - RACIOACTIVITY(MR/HR) (94) ,R2, ..-_. •- 11.0; • _ . - ... ._ ALL TESTS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, MERE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE EPA CHEMISTRY LABORATORY MANUAL. REMARKS- (Rf )- •*- TEST WAS FOR 'MOISTURE CONTENT, % DRY WGT•, NOT *SED ROX POT• LEGENDS (R2)- RADIOACTIVITY BACKGROUND - 7 COUNTS/MINUTE (C/N) LI- LIMIT OF INSTRMT _ _ (RS)- VALUE EXCEEDS 2 STU REVS FROM THE MEAN OFALLGULF OF NAIVE SanPLES, NP- NON-PLASTIC (44). - LT- LESS THAN (RS)- GT- GREATER THAN 2 PNOG A( 40fU3D0801 BOTTOM SEDIMENT SAM,OLEITEST RESULTS' ' ( RCS NEDEO-6 PAGEI 70-CHAOS- OS . STATUS AS OF 07 DEC 79 PROJECT SVHMARY - NUMBER OF - RANGE OF VALUES MEAN STANDARD OBSERVATIONS LOHEST MIGMEST (AVG VALUE) DEVIATION 4RA(4 SIZE CURVE-MED (34) - 3 0,016000 01035500 0,023333 0,010610 GRAIN Si1E- CURVE-01 (35) 3 0.034500 0,070000 0.053167 0,017820 G+aIt SIZECuRvt-nS (36) 3 - 0.000100 0.009900 0.009433 0.000416 SRT CCEF.(O1/03)**.S 3 1 .86677S 2.773501 2.357331 - O.u57929 Ow SIZF CURVt-% FINE (38) 3 76,000000 86,500000 BI .lbbbb7 5.251983 LI,:VID LI9IT (00) 3 - 79,000000 . - 117,000000 98.bbbb67 19,035055 PLASTIC LIMIT (41) 3 36,000000 57.000000 48.133333 10.909b55 PL=511C INDEX (42) 3 42,000000 60,000000 50.000060 9,16�1j1 SPCC GPAV SOLIDS (47) 3 2.300000 2,560000 2.43bbo7 0.130511 •::t UNIT .GT (PCF) (4$) 3 79,040000 ' •84,%70000 $1 .910000 2.72b2ul Ory UNIT *CT (PCF) (491 3 33. 710000 36,21000035;023333 1.254604 PLkCE?.T SOLIDS (50) 6 33.000000 49,000000 41.333333 6.712493 5:^I-ENT PH (51) - 3 7.600000 7.700000 7.633333 0,057735 S:f: RDx POT (MV) (52) 3 133, 100000 134.300000 133,800000 0.624499 % VOL SOLID.- EPA (57) - '3 12,400000 15,900000 14,133333 1.750235 X VOL SOLIDS- NED (58) 3 8.820000 10,400000 9.4•ubbb7 0,839126 Y TOT VCL SOL-EPA (59) PP• CFM OXYGEN DMND (60) 3 176,000.000000 . 280,000.000000 219,666.66b667 53,966,036703 PP• TOT *JDL NIT (bl ) 3 3, 100.000000 5,600.000000 4.566.bbbbo7 1.305,116130 PPr OIL 4 GREASE (62) 3 10600.000000 6.500.000000 4,800.000000 2,773.084925 PPM MERCURY (63) 6 1 .000000 1 ,500000 1.2.bb667 0,196038 PP',-LEAD (b4) 6 96.00P000 400.000000 302.66n6b7 — ' '137.239u,50— PP-`Z)NC (65) 6 100,000000 •320.,000000 231.6a 6b7 84.950966 PP•. ARSENIC (70) 6 2,000000 12,000000 7.166667. 3,163863 PPM BISMUTH (71) PPM Cao-IUM (72) - 6 2.000000 5,000000 3.66bb67 1.032795 PPr Cti40rI11M , (73) 6 500.000000 1,200,000000 053'.333333 311.b11909 apm COPPER (74) 6 _, 36.000000 .100.000000 80,bb6667 .27,007816 PPM IODINE (75) PP.. NICKEL - � (76) 6 34.000000 - 68,000000 54,333333 15,292099 PPM P,•(lsPMORUS (77) PPr SILVER (78) Pp.• TIN (79) PP" VauAOIUM (80) 6 93.000000 310.000000 213.833333 - 87.664478 X CARPON (ORGANIC) (85) .. . X CAPbDH fCAR80NATE) (86) La98,N (TOTAL) (87) % HYDROGEN (88) X NITROGEN - (89) __.. . _.. .._ ... .. .. _ _ _ .. Par "ENZENE (90) . PP. DDT (91) PP. PLYCML BIPH (92) . CA•7PO•: l4 (YRS) (93) . 99010+CrivltY(MR/MR) (94) 3 11 .000000 12.000000 11,333333 0,577350 ,. BLD. �+ 1 -f•IC EXISTING EXfSTiNy +5 E--E--- CHANNEL ^ . 1 M 1.O MLW _. 50•.WIDE ..--- . - - G� FLOAT - _ -----— •-----. . _. _. .... -- - r — MLW- 0-( 1 3 •lo �AUTHORI2ED' C+IsaN►JEL- BoTtONI------ —_ -.--- .--\.PR-oRoZED ---_----- ---10 - SECTION' : A -A : : . . . : scale :I." = lo1 : : : . . ._ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ - _.. . _. _ . . . . . . .. Re{�cenct _.A my-Cccps _:03 Erw- Aj-L480_ Prepwr,ed by: SASAKI ATS6 I TES 9302 (e4 PLEHSRNT sr. 9he+tcnd Pppec^4:e5 SHP AN D - - PROPERTIES BLD. d F h 10 +10 +5 CNANNEL EXI5T/A!(� - - - AT =4 —._ . !•t�W o•C /0 _ .. - PROPOSED------•— ------ 10 DR-EDGINU . ---- — ---- . . . . . SECT ION :- . B .. s�•�_.:►^ = is : . _ -- .. _ _ ----- -. . . ._.. Rcfet'.oc<LAcri�y�Co�PS:o'}._E .1'Ict._ 148 .... - --- •----•- -.. . . . . . . - - •------r ._. . _. __ .. . : .:. ._ _.. _ : _ . ^9 y X ---- — Preo. � reGt by SAsr+ki RSSOC/ATES 9302 5he•tln�d ptrope�+��s e L4 PLE14SANT Zr. _ -(TYPj) _PROPE RTJES 1 I BU p/ G - (AuTHc�izEq _. BoTra ►.�) —7.DSI _ M00 LIi! . _ .. i . - EXISTI RC4 CNANIJEL -- -- - 00' WIDE - t E--� - _. ._. .. . - i i — Prepared by: SFSA-cI fl5I CRATES — — -- --- ---1---- !04 PLEASAM7 ZT. 9 30Z I� aTcaTn,LU r7R. She+Iand Pcopert es I.- 7 4