Loading...
64-73 - SCOTT ROAD - CONSERVATION COMMISSION C9 '13 J T d 1 310 CMR 10.99 Form 8 DEP Foe No 64-73 ° In g (To De oroviaeo Dy DEP( 7 a N o n Commonwealth Gtv lows Cn l om �' 7 ., _ of Massachusettsw .3 0 Apol,cam David T.. Ehershoff .. - a. (D �• n w m = a r a m m Certificate of Compliance ° o Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act, G.L. c. 131 , §40 ^ N n m r• o n N 7 C N• From Salem Cons rvatinn Commissinn Issuing Authority rr N• r H* o To David L. Ebershoff c/o Donald C. Dolben, 75 State St. Boston, Ma. 02109 0 ° no cn n a (Name( (Address) y g n n d m r• o N M N Date of Issuance FAhriinrg , tgo 1 0 H• n O O m o ❑ This Certificate is Issued for work regulated by an Order of Conditions issued to David L. Ebershof f O 7 R dated 3/19/85 andissuedbythe Salem Cnnservation O p Commission and filed with the Essex County Southern Registry District of the w m Land Court as Document No. 201209. nfb w 1 . _ It is hereby certified that the work regulated by the above-referenced Order of Conditions has a m been satisfactorily completed. N, N n d 2. _ It is hereby certified that only the following portions of the work regulated by the above-refer- n ended Order of Conditions have been satisfactorily completed: (If the Certificate of Compliance o m ° M W 4 does not include the entire project.specify what portions are included.) .3 a (D wn rt (D b rN 7 m m" n z n o n • � z w .. In l7N rwo 3. = It is hereby certified that the work reoulated by the above-referenced Order of Conditions was 'i n m never commenced.The Order of Conditions has laosed and is therefore no longer valid:No future n d work subject to regulation under the Act may be commenced without filing a new Notice of Intent n w and receivinc a new Order of Conditions. _ ° (D m a d (Leave Soace Blank) n n C n 6 ry rt N z" o .- 00 00 V 00 V W 6-1 LEffectivell/10189 1 — This certificate shall be recorded in the Registry of Deeds or the Land Court for the district In which the land is located. The Order was originally recorded on April 11 , 1985 (date) at the Registry of Southern Essex as norumanZBook , Page No. 187873 recorded on May 17 , 1983 w 5. _ The following conditions of the Order snail continue: (Settorth any conditions contained in the m Final Order, such as maintenance or monitoring, which are to continue for a longer period.) m - rt 0 O K i rt a• r• 9 0 Issued by SALEM CONSERVATION COMMISSION m a fo Slgnature(s) w N. r 0 d itL �i r� S fD �tz�4�� 0 R odo M 0 Fn When issued by the Conservation Commislon this Certificate must be signed by a majority of is members. rr On thisday of /A , ��/ � 199. before me n personally appeared y '`� 1*) J%9,F:GC/ , to me known to be the person descnbed in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she executed n H. the same as his/her free act and deed. " N• n w rt -alt a .ltiuih o �fir,, �e.� ,1 /9951 0 0 Notary ubli My comms Sion expires n 0 v w detach on dotted line and submit to the - w p ro To Issuing Authority Please be advised mat the Certificate of Comouance for me protect at: File Number nay been recorded at the RegrsMt of 3nd has oeen nolec in .he:nain of ifte o,the atlec:ed droceny on i g is rP.=oeo lanc. C9•nszwmeni%rrcer'.en:cn:centilies:n:s transaction is !!re^ylsleree tendme cocumenl numder wNcn Identifies fn:s Iransachon is Sqnalure Aooucani 8-2 UZ 310 CMR 10.99 Foran 8 DEP Foe N 64-73 0 m ^ n m £ .10 oe orovioea ov DEP)En 7 a N o n Commonwealth Ctly lOw' cn l om of Massachusetts w y o ADDIILao; ay .T.. Fber Shoff r• 7 a rT= - P- fD N• _ cam O MN ora rt B rt Certificate of Compliance 0 0 Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act, G.L. c. 131, §40 N o n w r• o n GQ o < r• From Salem Conservation Cnmmissinn Issuing Authority °' w o r• rtw rr r• r H, o To David L. Ebershoff c/o Donald C. Dolben, 75 State St. Boston, Ma. 02109 0 ° 0 m n n (Name) (Address) w 0 ,o, n D m H' 0 Date of Issuance Fehrnary 14, 1 QQ1 O N 0 r• n n o 0 m 0 0 ffh Eb David L. ersoa a This Certificate is issued for work regulated by an Order of Conditions issued to o a n dated3/19/85 andissuedbythe Salem rnngPrVaYinnp ao Commission and filed with the Essex County Southern Registry District of the m Land Court as Document No. 201209. ~ 1 . _ It is hereby certified that the work regulated by the above-referenced Order of Conditions has n m i-n m been satisfactorily completed. r• E c n N• m W rt d 2. - It is hereby certified that only the following portions of the work reoulated by the above-refer- M 0• n enced Order of Conditions have been satisfactorily completed: (If the Certificate of Complianceo w 0 0 F+ C does not include the entire project,specify what portions are included.) y a 0 H 7y (D r (D 'U F+aQ 7 m r• m n 0 T o n w H.w � r• o 3. = It is hereby certified that the work regulated by the above-referenced Order of Conditions was n never commenced.The Order of Conditions has lapsed and is therefore no longer valid.No future w work subject to regulation under the Act may be commenced without filing a new Notice of-Intent n w and receivinga new Order of Conditions. w D _ m a d )J (Leave Soace Blank) n n C n � a N IY N z" o .- 00 W W 00 v v W B-1 Effective 11110/89 1 This certificate shall be recorded In the Registry of Deeds or the Land Court for the district In which the land is located. The Oraer was originally recorded on April 11 , 1985 (date) at the Registry of Southern FGGPx as n0oumparBook , Page . No. 187873 recorded on May 17 , 1983 w 5. = The following conditions of the Order shall continue: (Setforth any conditions contained in the m Final Order. such as maintenance or monitoring. which are to continue for a longer period.) - rt 0 O H rt N• O B O Issued by SALEM CONSERVATION COMMISSION o a m Signature(s) w N. r 0 � � rT I ' � 1� (D � rt, O M When issued by the Conservation Commislon this Certificate must be signed by a majority of is members. n On this r� day of- �11—CIQ�l�� I 19 9 before me N personally appeared ��`� �� /�yl-e%r' , to me known to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she executed n w the same as his/her free act and deed. N. n w ><iLd/LG71% C9 �IGt�IL X/1�/G In C.CC-� �1 �9�5 `° o Notary ubli My comm) cion expires 0 0 u b Detach on dotted line and submit to the W td To Issuing Authority Please be advised mat the Certificate of Compnance for the brotect at File Numoer nas been recorded at Me Registry of ana nas oeen notec in the chain of ode of:r.e affec:eo oroceny on •ecc•,eo lanc. :re•nsirumeni%ranee.errcn:oeni1r es:n:s:ransacnon Is !:recisierea lano.tie cocumem numaer vnon denttlies fns ransacnon is Signature aooucant S-2 x, MODIFICATION OF ORIGINAL ORDER 94 • Form 5 DEQE F8e No. 64-73 _ ?� (To be yovided by DEQE) SALEM Commonwealth - City/Town of-Massachusetts AGptcwd David Ebershoff E . Order of Conditions Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act G.L c. 131, §40 Fro SALEM CONSERVATION COMMISSION To Mr. David L. Ebershoff Joseph G. Raaone (Name of Applicant) (Name of property owner) Addressc/o Tinti, 9uinn, & Savov Address 437 Main Street, Lvnnfie_ld_ 222 Essex Street, Salem This Order is issued and delivered as follows: • ; Eby hand delivery to applicant or representative on March 20, 1985 (date) ❑ by certified mail, return receipt requested on (date) This project is located a 38 Swampscott Road, Salem The property is recorded at the Registry of Essex South Book Page It ` - Certificate (if registered) 38764 The Notice of Intent for this project was filed on February 13, 1985 - (date) The public hearing was closed on February 28 1985 (date) Findings The Salem Conservation Commission has reviewed the above-referenced Notice of Intent and plans and has held a public hearing on the project. Based on the information available to the rnrqp_ rata ._ nnmmiccinn at this time, the r'ommiacinn has determined that the area on which the proposed work is to be done is significant to the following interests in accordance with the Presumptions of Significance set forth in the regulations for each Area Subject to Protection Under the • Act(check as appropriate): ® Public water supply ❑ Storm damage prevention ® Private water supply D Prevention of pollution ® Ground water supply ❑ Land containing shellfish !x1 Flood control ❑ Fisheries 51 _ . 95 Therefore,the Conservation Commission hereby finds that the following conditions are • necessary,in accordance with the Performance Standards set forth in the regulations, to protect those inter- ests checked above.The rim orders that all work shall be performed in accordance with said conditions and with the Notice of Intent referenced above.To the extent that the tol- iowing conditions modify or differ from the plans,specifications or other proposals submitted with the Notice of Intent,the conditions shall control. General Conditions 1. Failure to comply with all conditions stated herein,and with ail retated statutes and other regulatory meas- ures, shall be deemed cause to revoke or modify this Order. 2. This Order does not grant any property rights or any exclusive privileges; it does not authorize any injury to private property or invasion of private rights. 3. This Order does not relieve the permittee or any other person of the necessity of complying with all other applicable federal, state or local statutes,ordinances, by-laws or regulations. 4. The work authorized hereunder shall be completed within three years from the date of this Order unless either of the following apply: (a) the work is a maintenance dredging project as provided for in the Act; or (b) the time for completion has been extended to a specified date more than three years, but less than five years, from the date of issuance and both that date and the special circumstances warranting the extended time period are set forth in this Order. S. This Order may be extended by the issuing authority for one or more periods of up to three years each • upon application to the issuing authority at least 30 days prior to the expiration date of the Order. 6. Any fill used in connection with this project shall be clean fill, containing no trash, refuse, rubbish or de- bris, including but not limited to lumber, bricks, plaster,wire, lath, paper, cardboard, pipe, tires, ashes, refrigerators, motor vehicles or parts of any of the foregoing. y• No work shall be undertaken until all administrative appeal periods from this Order have elapsed or, if such ah appeal has been filed, until all proceedings before the Department have been completed. i t 8. No work shall be undertaken until the Final Order has been recorded in the Registry of Deeds or the tend Court for the district in which the land is located,within the chain of title of the affected property. In the rase of recorded land, the Final Order shall also be noted in the Registry's Grantor Index under the name of the owner of the land upon which the proposed work is to be done. in the case of registered land, the Final Order shall also be noted on the Land Court Certificate of Title of the owner of the land upon which the proposed work is to be done.The recording information shall be submitted to the Comm; as on on the form at the end of this Order prior to commencement of the work 9. A sign shall be displayed at the site not less than two square feet or more than three square feet in size bearing the words,"Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering, File Number 64-73 10. Where the Department of Environmental Quality Engineering is requested to make a determination and to issue a Superseding Order, the Conservation Commission shall be a party to all,agency proceedings • and hearings before the Department. 11. Upon completion of the work described herein, the applicant shall forthwith request in writing that a Certificate of Compliance be issued stating that the work has been satisfactorily completed. 12.The work shall conforn to the following plans and special conditions: ( .. 5-2 9.7 • Salem Conservation Commission Issued By Si ture( This Order must be Signed by a majority of the Conservation Commission. On th+4 19 of March g 85 before me personJly appeared the to me known to be the pli;son,described in and who executed the foregoing Instrument and acknowledged that he/she executed the same aghWber free act and eed. �� 7 ✓/ ,./ 9-9-88 Notary Public / My commission expires • The applicant,the owner,any person aggrieved by this Order,arty owner of land abutting the land upon which the proposed work's to be dons or any ten residems of the city or town in whim such land is located are hereby notified of their right to request the Department of FirAm nmental Quality Engineering to issue a Superseding Order,providing the request is made try certified mail or hand delivery to f`a Deowtmem within ten days hon the date of issuance of this Order.A cpy of the request shat at the same time be sent by certified mz i or hand delivery to the Conservation Commission and the apprwarrt - Detach on dotted line and submit to the Sa1Pm COTISPY *' r`nmm; oe;_nn—prior to commencement of work. [swing Authority To Please be advised that the Order of Conditions for the project a and File Number has been recorded at the Registry of in accordance with General Condition 8 on 19_ has been noted lo the chain of title of the affected property It recorded land, the instrument number which identifies this transaction u It registered land,the document number which identifies this transaction AcMicant Signature _ 5-4A 96 Plans: Title Dated Signed and Stamped by: On File with: Development Report, Proposed Ebershoff 'Development, Swampscott Road, Feb,15, 1985 Hazardous Waste Report, Exhibit A, Site Assessment Summary Relative to Massachusetts Superfund Act, December 11, 1984 On File with Cons. Commission Site Plan (with utilties) , dated February 15 1985 Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Detail, dated February 15, 1985 Special Conditions(Use additional paper H necessary) THIS IS A MODIFICATION OF ORIGINAL ORDER ISSUED ON MARCH 12, 1961, AND SUBSEQUENTLY EXTENDED. 1. All work shall be in accordance with the proposal and plans submitted entitled "Proposed Ebershof£ Development", Swamnscott Road,. prepared by Rizzo Asso.csates, Inc. , dated February 15, 1985, and all above-referenced plans and reports: 2. Soil erosion both during and after construction shall be kept to a minimum by employing procedures recommended in the Erosion and Sedimentation Control • Guidelines, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, DEQE, Division of Water Supply and Montachusett Regional Planning Commission, dated August 1963. .Eros;on and " sedimentation control shall conform to details submitted. 3. During the exposure of fill material on the site, the services of a professional with expertise in hazardous waste site assessments shall be employed. Any unsat- isfactory fill material as defined in General Condition #6 shall be segregated. and removed ,to an approved disposal site. Any fill material considered hazardous will be isolated, covered and tested in accordance with a plan jointly approved by the Commonwealth of Massachusette Department of Environmental Quality Engineering and the Conservation Commission. The hazardous material will then be removed by a licensed contractor to an approved disposal site. Copies of delivery slips, signed by the disposal site operator shall be supplied to the Conservation Commission for both unsatisfactory and hazardous materials. 4. Prior to commencement of excavation of fill material, notification shall be given to the Commission. : Duration of excavation shall be no longer than two ..................................._................_................................._.............................................................................................. (Leave Space Blank) 5.3A • MODIFICATION OF ORDER OF CONDITIONS #64-73 ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS weeks unless otherwise specified by the Conservation Commission. 5. Certification that the site is free of hazardous waste shall be supplied to the Conservation Commission prior to commencement of building construction. 6. As-built drawings, stamped by a Registered Professional Engineer or a Registered Land Surveyor shall be submitted to the Conservation Commission prior 4 to issuance of a Certificate of Compliance. 7. No application of road salt for the purpose of de-icing roadways or parking areas shall be permitted in the development. 8. The members and agents of the Conservation Commission shall have the right to enter and inspect the premises to evaluate the compliance with these conditions and to require the applicant to submit any date deemed necessary by the Commission for the evaluation. Any changes made or intended to be made in the plans, shall require the applicant to inquire of the Commission in writing whether the change requires a new filing. • FORM 4 CORDER OF CONDITIONS ` W E T L A N D S P R O T E C T I O N A C T G.L. C. 131, s. 40 ------------ ----------------------------------- ------------- CITY/TOWN Salem FILE NUMBER 64-73 TO: NAME Joseph G. Ragone ADDRESS 437 Main St . Lynnfield, MA. CERTIFIED MAIL NUMBER PROJECT LOCATION: Address Swampscott Road , Salem, Mass . - Recorded at Registry of Deeds Book 29 Page 7091 . Certificate (if registered) 38764 REGARDING: Notice of Intent dated October 15 , 1980 and plans titled and dated "Construction Details , Mini Wharehouse Self- Service Storage Facility , Swampscott Rd, Salem, Mass" THIS ORDER IS ISSUED ON (date) March 12 , 1981 dated 2/17/81 . ------------------------------------------------------------------- Pursuant to the authority of G.L. c. 131, s. 40, the SALEM CONSERVATION COMMISSION has reviewed your Notice of -Intent and plans identified above, and has determined that the area on which the proposed work is to be done is significant to one or more of the interests listed in G.L. c. 131., s. 40. The SALEM CONSERVATION COMMIS-SION hereby orders that the following conditions are necessary to protect said interests and all work shall be performed in strict accordance with them and with the Notice of Intent and plans identified above except where such plans are modified by said conditions. -------------------------------------------------------------------- CONDITIONS .1. Failure to comply with all conditions stated herein, and with all related statutes and other regulatory measures, shall be deemed cause to revoke or modify this order. i -1- FORM 4 ORDER OF CONDITIONS CONTINUED FILE NUMBER 64-73 - 2. This order does not grant any property rights or any exclu- sive privileges; it does not authorize any injury to private property or invasion of private rights. 3. This order does not relieve the permittee or any other per- son of the necessity of complying with all other applicable federal, state or local statutes; ordinances, by-laws and/ or regulations. 4. The work authorized hereunder shall be completed within one (1) year from the date of this order unless it is for a maintenance dredging project subject to Section 5(9) . The .. order may be extended by the issuing authority for one or - - - - more additional one-year periods upon application to the said issuing authority at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date of the order or its extension. 5. Any fill used in connection with this project shall be clean fill, containing no trash, refuse, rubbish or debris, includ- ing,.without limiting the generality of the foregoing, lumber, bricks, plaster, wire, lath, paper, cardboard, pipe, tires, ashes, refrigerators, motor vehicles or parts of any of the foregoing. 6. No work may be commenced untill all appeal periods have -. elapsed from the order of the Conservation Commission or from a final order by the Department of Environmental Quality Engineering. ' 7. No work shall be undertaken until the final order, with respect to the proposed project,, has been recorded in the Registry of Deeds for the district in which the land is located within the chain of title of the affected property. The Document number indicating such recording shall be sub- mitted on the form at the end of this order to the issuer of this order prior to commencement of work. 8. A sign shall be displayed at the site not less than two square feet or more than three square feet bearing the words, "Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering, Number _64-73 9. Where the Department of Environmental Quality Engineering is requested to make a determination and to issue a super- seding order, the Conservation Commission shall be a party to all agency proceedings and hearings before the Depart- ment. -2- T ORDER OF CONDITIONS CONTINUED FILE NO. 64-73 C10. Upon completion of the work described herein, the applicant shall forthwith request, in writing, that a Certificate of Compliance be issued stating that the work has been satis- factorilycompl.eted. 11. The work shall conform to the Following described plans and - - additional conditions. THE SALEM CONSERVATION COMMISSION HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED WORK AND AREA ARE SIGNIFICANT TO FLOODING AND TO THE PREVENTION OF POLLUTION AND IMPOSES THE FOLLOWING, ORDERS : a . Except as modified by these orders , all work shall conform to the drawings prepared by Philip G . Christiansen, PE , titled "Construction Details , Mini Wharehouse Self Service Storage \ Facility, Swampscott ,Rd, Salem" , as revised and dated 2/17/81 _ `b. The proposed outlet channel cross section invert (detail 4 , sheet 4) shall be at elevation 70 . 5 , mean low water datum. The outlet invert elevation shall be set by construction of a concrete weir ,upstream of the proposed gabions. The weir shall extend into impervious soil in the bed of the constructed outlet channel . C . All hay or straw pump discharge siltation control . dams , as shown on sheet 4 , shall be sized such that there,'`s,hali . be no flow passing around the upstream bales. d. Erosion control shall be practised during: all phases` and; on all 'sections of work to minimize siltation . All . slopes` Shah be covered with loam and seeded with grass during the. .grow,incseason immediately following completion of grading of the 'sI0pe,. ; e. Once work begins ,on site, the construction driversio"" truc- tures , channels and permanent slopes into streams and wetlands shall continue until completed. The work shall not remain un completed over a winter to spring period. f. All inoperable machiner, pipes and junk shall be removed from the site prior to the commencement or work. g. At least 4 weeks prior to the start of work the drawings , modified in accordance with these orders , shall be submitted to the commission for review. Elevations shall be noted as being to mean low 'water datum. h. The applicant shall verify the commission two weeks prior to the start of work. - - ;, -3- ORDERS OF CONDITIONS -'continued The applicant, any person aggrieved by this order, any owner r of land abutting the .land upon which the proposed work is to be i done, or any ten residents of the city or town in which such land is located, are hereby notified of their right to appeal this order to the Department of Environmental Quality Engineering provided the request is made in writing and by certified mail to the Department within ten (10) days from the issuance of this order. ISSUED BY SALEM CONSERVATION _ - G COMMISSION Ll On this 12 day of March 19 81 before me personally appeared +y—Tam, s T®.mans— to me known to be the person described in, and who executed, the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he executed the same as his free act and deed My Commission expires r) 1 DETACH ON DOTTED LINE AND SUBMIT TO THE ISSUER OF THIS ORDER PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. TO (Issuing Authority) PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT THE ORDER OF CONDITIONS FOR THE PROJECT AT FILE NUMBER , HAS BEEN RECORDED AT ,THE REGISTRY OF ON (DATE) If recorded land, the instrument-number which identifies this trans- - action is _ If registered land, the document number which identifies this trans- action is Signed Applicant r WETLAND PROTECTION ACT MASSACHUSETTS G.L. C. 131 5. 40 i NOTICE OF INTENT ALL PARTS OF THIS FORM SPALL BE COMPLETED UNDER THE PAINS AND PENALTY OF PERJURE INCLUDING THE ENVIRONMENTAL DATA FORM ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF OR THE FILING MAY BE CONSIDERED INCOMPLETE. DATE September 1b60 1. Notice is hereby given in accordance with the provisions of G.L. C. 131 s. 40, that the proposed activity as submitted herein falls within the jurisdictior of said statute, and is located in the City/Town Salem Swampscott Road Street. Recorded at the Registry of Deeds Book 29 Page '/091 Certificate (if registered) No. 367b4 2. The name(s) , address and telephone number of owner(s) of the .subject land are: NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE NO. Joseph G. Ragone 437 Main Street , Lynnfield, NiA 334-341,4 3 . I have filed identical Notices and plans by Certified Mail with the ! following: Imo . Conservation Commission (original) Date Mass. Department of Natural Resources 100 Cambridge St. , Boston (3 copies) Date Mass. Department of Public Works 100 Nashua St. , Boston (1 copy) Date 57-�(06 4. Have all per. its, variances and approvals as required by C. 131 s. 40 been obtained? N (yes or no) . Attach copies to original Notice of Intent. S. Enclosed is Statutory Filing Fee of $25.00, payable to City or Town. 6. The name, address and telephone number of the owner' s representatives (if any) are as follows: NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE NO. Attorney i EngineerFhilipG. Christiansen 772 Main St. W. NewburiilAu 465-0056 Agent The purpose of the project is: (Use additional sheets if necessary)' To construct a mini warehouse stor complex /n 8. "Owner' s (or agent ' s signature) I _ Property of Joseph G. Ragone Located on-Swampscott Road Salem, MA. The following application is made on behalf of Joseph G. Ragone, Lynnfield, NIA. It is proposed that a Mini Warehouse Self Service Storage Facility be built on his property located on Swampscott Road. A self service storage facility consists of a series of units ranging in size from 5x5 feet to 30x15 feet. These units are rented to individuals for storage of personal belongings. While many units are in one building, they are all separate and each has its own entrance. A complex similar to the one proposed here is located on Rt. 1, Lynnfield. Four buildings are proposed for the site. Three of the buildings will be one story while the building closest to Swampscott Road will be two stories. The total building floor area will be approximately 50, 000 square feet. An apartment will be on site for the use of the facility manager. i L Protect f/C, Client 4" ea page of Subject Comptd. By Date Detail ,,7 j,4 e%,c- Ck'd. By Date T ev 5h E W cove NxTaimerZ t IL Sl W—V,Mi Y SG (7 u CF- .1 1 \ AREA - h AREA C� AREA u / .A-� 1 yF o a O •y �YtkY / : LIMITS OF WATEeSHED – — .ORAINAGE AREAS SITE 15OUNDA21ES STREAM FIGURE ,2 WATERSH E TQPO EhLf- .gb FROK U 56S SURVEY- 5 EG FIG 1. WETLAND PROTECTION ACT ENVIRONMENTAL DATA FORM 1. 7.11 parts of this form are to be filled out by the applicant or y his agent under the provisions of G.L. CH. 131 s. 4O. {► 2. Where a section is not relevant to the application in question, the words "Not applicable" should be entered on the appropriate line. NAME OF APPLICANT Joseph G. Ragone ADDRESS OF APPLICANT 437 Main StreetLynnfield, IV1A. MUNICIPALITIES WHERE ACTIVITY IS PROPOSED AND NOTICE IS FILED. Salem, MA. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY INVOLVED IN APPLICATION (including the dimensions See attached property of any existing buildings, decks, marinas, existing cesspools) description, page 5 DESCRIPTION OF MODIFICATIONS PROPOSED ON THE SITE, including grading, dredging, See attached description, page '5, removal of vegetation, etc. figures and plans A. SOILS 1. United States Department of Agriculture Soil Types (show on map) Soils on site have been disturbed by previous site work. Fill used on site Bedrock is exposed-en-site-. 2. Permeability of soil on the site. (Dates of testing) No test taken. Probablyn/1. 0 cm/sec 3. Rate of percolation of water through the soil. (Dates of testing) No test B. SURFACE WATERS 1. Distance of site from nearest surface water (Date of measurement) Surface water on site. 2. Sources of runoff water Rainfall, streams at west and north of site, swamp at north end of site. 2 - Joseph G. Ragone 3. Rate of runoff from the site 71 cfs, see attached calculations 4. Destination of runoff water Forest River 5. Chemical additives to runoff water on the site None C. GROUND COVER Approximately 1/2 acre of ledge at or 1. Extent of existing impervious near surface plus 3 acres of water ground cover on the site surface. 2. Extent of proposed impervious See sheet 2. Approximately 2. 5 acres ground cover on the site plus water surface. j 3. Extent of existing vegetative Total site 10. 2 acres. cover on the site Approx. 3 acres water, . 5 acres ledge, 6 7 acres vegPtatf-d from It cuss to wood; 4. Extent of proposed vegetative Total site proposed vegetation: 4. 2 acres cover on the site D. TOPOGRAPHY 1. Maximum existing elevation on site 91 I 2. Minimum existing elevation of site 65. 5 3. Maximum proposed elevation of site 91 4. Minimum proposed elevation of site 41 5. Description of proposed changa in topography See attached plans. E. GROUND WATER 1. Minimum depth to water table on site (at time of filing) Lehhss than 1 ft. 2. Maximum deDtfeeto water table on site (at time of filing) 3. Seasonal maximum ground water elevation . 70. 5 F. WATER SUPPLY 1. The source of the water to be provided to the site City water 2. The expected water requirements (g.p.d. ) for the site bG0 gpd, 3 . The uses to which water will be put Domestic use and cleaning 3 - Joseph G. Ragone C. SEWAGE DISPOSAL 1. Sewage disposal system (description Septic tank andleachfield and location on the site, of system) ( See sheet 3) 2. Expected content of the sewage human wastes effluents (human waste, pesticides, detergents, oils, heavy metals, other chemicals) 3. Expected daily volumes of sewage o50 gpd H. SOLID .WASTE 1. Estimated quantity of solid waste 10 tons/year to be developed on the site Domestic and commercial waste 2. Method for disposal of solid waste Contract haul 3. . Plans for recycling of solid waste None I. BOAT YARDS, DOCKS, MARINAS 1. Capacity of marina (number of INbt Applicable boats running feet) 2. Description of docks and floats (site, dimensions) Not Applicable 3. Description of sewage pumpout Not Applicable facilities (type of waste disposal) pp 4. Description of fuelling facilities and fuel storage tanks Not Applicable 5. Description of fuel spill prevention measures and equipment Not Applicable J. IMPACT OF PROPOSED ACTION APPLIED FOR 1 . Effects on plant species Plants in work area (2. 5 acres) will be (upland and marine) eliminated. 2. Effects on marine species (shellfish; finfish) None 4 — Joseph G. Ragone 3. Effects on drainage and runoff See attached calculations. Runoff rate will be 64 cfs max. 1 emporary siltation control 4. Effects on siltation of surface waters will be used during construction such as haXbales Final project 5. Effects on groundwater quality None will reduce siltation from site because area will be paved. 6. Effects on surface water quality hone K. ALTERNATIVES TO PROPOSED ACTION 1. Describe alternatives to the Stream that is on site could be put requested .action through a culvert or channelized. 2. Describe the benefits of the requested action over the alternatives The proposed flow change would: 1. assure a reduced peak runoff from the site. 2. provide for an open stream flow rather than a culverted stream. 5 - Joseph G. Ragone DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY INVOLVED IN APPLICATION: in the County of Essex and said Commonwealth, bounded and described as follow9: EASTERLY by Swampscott Road, on three lines measuring together, six hundred thirty and 23/100 (630.23) feet; SOUTHEASTERLY by lot 525, as shown on plan hereinafter mentioned, on two lines measuring to- gether, five hundred eighty two and 78/100 (582.78) feet; SOUTHWESTERLY by lot 531, as shown on said plan, four hundred eighteen and 43/100 (418.43) feet; WESTERLY by land now or formerly of Frederick H. Griswold, on two lines measuring together, two hundred ninety eight and 50/100 (298.50) feet; NORTHWESTERLY by said Griswold land, thirty nine and 98/100 (39.98) feet; WESTERLY by said Griswold land fifty six and 70/100 (56.70) feet; NORTHWESTERLY by lots 501 and 502, as shown on said plan, on four lines measuringtogether, seven hundred ten and 01/100 (710.01) feet; NORTHEASTERLY. by lots 518, 519, 520, 521, 522 and 523, on two lines measuring together, two hundred eighty two and 98/100 (282.98) feet; and NORTHERLY by said lot 523, as shown on said plan, one hundred five and 22/100 (105.22) feet. All of said boundaries are determined by the Court to be located as shown upon plan numbered 11802 D, drawn by Thomas A. Appleton, Civil Engineer, dated August 27, 1928, as modified and approved by the Court, filed in the Land Registration Office, a copy of a portion of which is filed with Certificate of Title #7179 in said Registry, and the above described land is shown as lot #524, sheet 3, on last mentioned plan. DESCRIPTION OF MODIFICATION PROFUSED UN THE STT'E. - - It is proposed that the existing topography and stream flow shown on sheet 1 will be changed to the proposed topography and stream flow shown on sheet 2. The old stream bed will be filled and some high spots will be cut. All vegetation in the work area will be removed. The completed site will contain four buildings and the areas in and around the buildings will be paved. I i i I Project Si?l�.nJ f,1 �: �,''F::�F=�i. .!< ClientPage of Subject._ SToo , I --49-254-2' C u�IJ d 4°1 S/3 /�J {e- " / ompt . By —Py 0 Date - Detail //.SCk'd. By Date l�AraF/LGL .77NTc!J5 ! ,-y s ex-j-B Y �� /B - o i-1 e? z s Y sro,Z� �Wk r U ALCbvr.— 7h� /oo Y/4 TP 5(a / �-o L 7-,45dC67 Q 72�- /pL Su /d u.-�0,4/0 /6s ZS 40 , 5--5— ie V4#-?-4 S'ieV4#-?-G is7Arc,T'S . /o zS Z (.7 G G ✓�f-GG $ 6 J� N� ( n( / M ✓}'L !�E✓bZ0 �/�IEN W W Q �rJ GqL e ttLK}T/ 01tn 5 , t S U Iu EX/sTi/u c5 ea NDiT/ ONS 1�6N1--> /¢eer7 a. C7 J As s c.L vr7 04-(; 2 IL Ge a Ez s % / FT z , s 14 612-&,s bO /&�/o p rJ CF-9 / F-7 ff Y ��66 6;,zpy- Ptd EZo Pct U/s � KQ ✓9T/O`Yi 0P 7b 19E O///t_1 //y/io�L Project 976R,46f- L(,1{q!-//;nom. (wc Client _ )2>4'C> Pageof /Z Subject `; %JQ+v! tr) 4 ,7-7L 'r CEJIp6 Sw'O zcf Comptd.By Date Detail tX, r.T'r-±s, 1...601 ,- ^ r . -•I Ck'd. By Date 4re,4 Z _ /BDo F7 -ho X /y00 FT T Y W 4-o v ?M,-7 OV 0 /S00 FT -� o ?-� i-• Lav r/ fci y -7 \,/ & y L oU L /00 FT + Sid r-T N CN+4 nJr22 4c eel SQe F1 C7 741 r— Z A �;,o --7U/%(vo = 3-s z — w Z a a N Sc0V�e. 745 w /5o Sa/ivov s C _ 3z., s c = 6 IL `�, 2 IL /r y /z x�) ` dG+2zy � C D I2-) L fry /-5 /x/. 88 - /�./3 J v le'00 T-/2.5.5 ,. = 3 /6 z5,(3.> )Ca�� = 3 5. 38 e �S Project S77ZP<j fi,6- t,!r+d C14 ed., c Client � E2o/JE Page Z of Subject 577 /V7 4�) •: i( t /-L-0i<_l ComPtd. By Date Detail - T°'-� (n �' = -I�'�� Ck'd.By Date C /5� - Leo/i��.� _ = • 2s' 5 � 33. 25 Cfs . nn L_y n�'/ 'lO C/ z. u o' z tJ/zv u = / _ t (6 e2„r) q god ,-,” .. Zoo F /6 = w NEy; 20 ]F7— v 1..0 Y n: w w 'z. S L S/a s z ' e 1/ 2- (n N K 2 u 73 � --ob •�yz-v J � �z-�rJ IL /Ij °' � 3�ioxZ = 3 • GS fps / . 40Ti9 c Pcv J 13 4d 4 b = yS f3 8 tS• 7 88 7,Acres %SS HD pi i,IJ T/ r: ,s- 3• S• q_( .S�c•?Sxg .�� 7��= i (/ S y (,�. , r �, 00zs� Z .B6 iiiz-y ✓ . so _ -: ^ TRY 2� �= y/` _ •f-ry 2. 5 j Q= 5-7 , f3 (i7 . 7N TRy 2' 7S Q = 66 . 388 2 . � 0 �i= 7 . �l� Z, , X,s ) = /,T9 so 0 • Project S7Z)P-46,t Client C90t1E Page Subject :!`- ' n Yf/Ii�YL lo;,.� Comvtd.By 1 (7C Date Detail G,NST7N C-> C 'D/J N�'T/ 2 it Ic Ck'd.By Date fc = 3B, iGt x/, 39 = 12. 6Soie413 (du7e F2 rho .ib eucfi(-t C�,3GE' Sc� PC 3� �/� S) � . 2-s) (J. 2 )(89.7) w a I Z w z Q p x U t� J a. a Project S7De.i1C.-,e�- N.lri,+.• is I C/ Client . VI., b: J Page Subject Ei.'--' ComPtd. By Date Detail C%-� - . .) '-� Co '_ i-i, .: Ck'd. By Date �J i� AZEo9 e c 1pd�J 2 , 6✓�ces5 - r ur ya„v c,a.; 4 A S yoo w a 8o0 z w U) /. SL, yao .3 5- U u 52 . 0 6p 2 .S 37. 5 0 ASSN. "Ir S%UR-I l G IL 5/7. 0 7/ 2-Z zS,BS x a 75 2,0 16, 7S- /8 G. 7s/8 PHILIP G. CHRISTIANSEN, P.E. n �1 r a 17dn>>i Oc. Tt.!'i Hss 4 2, 6 Iy a« //(c "F �_.��/� / Gii iDTi� .Y r - /f= r U� — .e"• k 2 9sg� 9 a 67Z yioy a 0/2 Q(B 66Y7 1 o -1 9 9zoo 5lzo0 y / 1,c� 8 ,, z 6 ,07 7 p -25 Zv SSU Zo moo . / 8 72 . z ( of 0 30 1,q-00 11) '300. 29 /. l $ y. s8 .z5 041 y6 0 -35 v72oo .9/ S 166 141183 3Y yl •78 Loo 0- 60 //v 2/00 //o, 060 . 97 3.G6 s,5y 6S 7S Z, 8 2:7oo ° o 0 6—� / /3 //300 / 2 6,300 /•/3 `,Sy C. 2 (7 • 7,2. .90 3. 6' n a � m o-> r) /q 1 ,500 r3000 /rzo' 1/,`8z G • q v ds ov / 38700 /. 2t l/. fs9 G .yq 76 83 Li :i I y 00 o-90 l y6soo 6 o-s,' 1416 soo / 3 s 5-00 //vv x - 837 / 3qNo(, l,lS y,7y 6 .36 � y ,6z. w PHILIP G. CHRISTIANSEN, P.E. N 9 Fl—ow to F6/3'e�:> E x s7l IV 67 N J 1 n N Y2 39 F O 30 m a m D � n i !g o 0 0 A Ou7TLF l 6 /a 15 Zn 25 so JS •/o ✓S so , 5o kv 9+� 5r iao Project _577D P— 146 E UJ 14 i�f/�0�C S(-- Client 44 n6 O 1,)e Page � of 13 Subject- IOP N1 11L) I�-Tf7i. �(�y-� Comptd. By P• L - Date - 5��0 ,�4� Detail / IUp O. -(� �/i IJ Z% % 0� Ck'd. By Date C = AV W = C , 14 72, 62. 72. 62 = /, Y `C Y3 S S z = a3S �- Zv • � 7t ,l2 x 4i W aEn E J = 2 IL IS t u / ~: Project ClientPa 9 13 e of Subject p TC!L m [;e—Z1 Cl f t J Comptd. By Date _ / d Detail ! �/�O$x'17 1-6/U -L) 7—/ 1)Z,5 Ck'd. By Date 3 f" 3 . SS 3a„'. p OJT Z 3 Ze)• �/6 3 Age C Sc� S/tE�ff 2 0 2 5(0/0E D ' M: Yov ' S77 / 9 6178 z w z Boo ' Zo, y'6 z7 y, o Lo, l6 32, S9 x lq0 33 , Zs a J Sig 60 Z . s 7 L 37.6a Ja 2, i Lo, 76 3z, L3 75 z, o l6 ,lz 0 9a /, U 3 Protect Client Page of �. Subject ";77)2+7? k C/ iY- 7721. l-I'nl-rl COmptd. By !� l re, Date ho o Detail)nPro oposl:�-y eEC A) ! T! 0 ,Js Ck'd. By Date O •. w ' Y = acv t yoo l2 ,E � z3.s y� 3 / 3 .sV e�vv 23 , 00 w 2,0 C) 32,yo 33 3, 7 ZS, S� a W 37 31 Ll 3 6• z� az, > 2- 9W U) U `1 IL 3Z, �3, � 2• n /& , z a Project '57—O)v <e Client /�-/'¢� C77'_J� Page of Subject �T��.//9 ���fa' .`7L. =tc'�---� Comptd. By P�C" Date s 3 b Detail ��V�L$( V (.!f»`� / / ., i Ck'd. By Date I n n ' a Z w U) Z F N M � U 4 U a 6o a_ .J 2 a / / T b � 9n o ti. 4 x o � v •� v CIO 7z7- Project s�l /°l='�j(. [.ci(.�! C -� :j(!Cr` Client F h2�)6'r�E Page f Subject S T/3.4 ,to !1"r9- Com Ptd. By Date Detail '�'t` �` !�'�� �� Ck'd.By Date lJ fa X 3 so ' �0Qy 20 cd , pE (2d fy)o -Z IL wt w a fry 2! i�C22o Z z q _ �1:� • 7'l a ~ z, N U ✓ 7 , Z �= Go' c� 75 l C Project SCJ e'.,J/� ultl/tc/il' ,G [;-� Client eta� Page— of /l Subject � )k°r:� ��:/!:r';..., :.i.,, �✓ ' I � '.•- Comptd.By - C� �— Date Detail _%��Oj�G`r'-7� Ck'd. By Date ioo 136 ib . s 2S vs yov S77 23 yZ 6, Ob dao 2,0. V 31 3-B l9•yv / Zoo 3Y,31 3S 3.5 3o, oZ /yov 3 3g s. / 33, 2- r fo 2.8 t. 36 G 9 . 2-'3. ?s 37, 6c/ 26 2, 3 w '2.2-3 8 3 z,0 /6, / z z N /7,S a y si !'g �, 8C) 3-65 SS x 0 55 /tb a _J 2 y'60 400 / 2.6o Z), �o t 3,00 33 3, - lZoo 32, ti0 37 , 3• / 22. �U • -- sa 75 2,60 Zo, s6 zZ 93,E /, G 6.9 PHILIP G. CHRISTIANSEN, P.E. � N D � O 5N n • m, g� kO YL i 614 /oi O Sb n o c: 3 A D 3 � d 4v 3• 3z !6 0 o v A A o 8 /6 74 3z 4o V S'_- N4 92- flo SS S6 /°Y //L /20 /Z$ • r Project ">7Q,19, 94,1- Client �l�C^>Chl� Page of i ? Subject ?e-'Z? k) .7/ ,2 C mac.) ComPtd. By � c_ Date Detail aDv S�' Ck'd.By Date � M O rJ o � ? �O �O f 11 y f� IQ13 oa N If � '0 -j a 21- w � � � _ J IL - o 0 a 4L N M (� In m `O r\1 M n o QO ,n 0 0 o t o � W o $ o o t`o pp N o Q U O N 1� iv) rA 1\ 0 0 0 4 O d o IIZ'L'U�Y�.)t7 i Engineers and Ent'ironmenlal Planners r- a aSite -Exhibit- nt SummaryRELATIVE TO THE MASSACHUSETTS t_} • ACT 38 Swampscott • • . • Salem, Massachusetts December _ • • • L: �1 �I ' � f 235 Wes! Central Slreel Natick, A4ac acbusetls 01760 u 1 ' r� a `.J U 1� L; I Engineers and Environmental Planners 235 West Central Street, Natick, Massachusetts 01760 (617)651-3401 ' December 11, 1984 ' Mr. David L. Ebershoff Ebershoff and Company 777 South Wadsworth Boulevard Suite 206 Lakewood, Co 80226 ' Dear Mr. Ebershoff : We are pleased to submit this Site Assessment Summary relative t to the Massachusetts Superfund Act (the Act) for land owned by Joseph G. Ragone, located at 38 Swampscott Road in Salem, Massachusetts (the Site) . This summary is Exhibit A to the t title insurance form entitled "Site Report Relative to Hazardous Materials. " Purpose and Scope The purpose of this report is to summarize whether there is ' evidence of oil or hazardous materials being released on or in the vicinity of the Site. This includes release of materials from off-site sources which have migrated to the Site. The ' findings stated herein are based on investigations of secondary data, information provided in interviews, Site inspections, subsurface investigations, and laboratory analysis of soil, groundwater, and surface water samples collected from the Site. 1 Summary ' The Site is a 10. 2 acre parcel of partially filled land in Salem, Massachusetts. Some of the fill formerly on the Site may have contained hazardous materials, but this fill was removed from the Site soon after its placement. In addition, several potential sources of contamination are located near the Site. 1 Engineers&Environmental Planners Soil and water samples collected from the Site were analyzed for heavy metals and volatile organic compounds. All ' contaminant concentrations in all samples were below their respective allowable concentrations defined in the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) and the Resource Conservation and ' Recovery Act (RCRA) . The laboratory results indicate that contaminants have neither been released on the Site nor migrated from off-site sources to the Site to a significant extent. Site Location The Site is located in the southwestern portion of the City of Salem, Massachusetts near the intersection of Highland Avenue (Route 107 ) and Swampscott Road. The street address of the Site is 38 Swampscott Road. Figure 1, Locus Map, on the following page shows the location of the Site. ' Site Description ' The Site consists of one 10 . 2 acre parcel of land designated as Map 7 , Parcel 66 by the City Assessor' s Office. It is currently owned by Joseph G. Ragone. Site boundaries and other details are shown on Figure 2, Plot Plan, which follows. The eastern portion of the Site, near Swampscott Road, lies at an elevation of approximately 80 to 85 feet. The topography ' slopes downward to a pond located in the western portion of the Site. One stream enters the Site from the north and discharges into the pond. A second stream enters the Site from the west, ' also discharging into the pond. A third stream drains the pond and is located in the southern portion of the Site. The stream flows to the Forest River Conservation Area and eventually to Thompsons Meadow, a reserve drinking water supply located one ' mile south of the Site. Wetland areas are located on the Site around the pond and streams. Figure 3, Topography, shows the contours of the Site and adjacent parcels. ' Fill has recently been added to the northeastern part of the Site to raise the land elevation. There is no vegetation in ' this area. The western part of the Site is vegetated primarily with wetland species. The southeastern part of the Site is a wetland area with several small bodies of standing water. 2 - �e�fl�rts��$/NItAUNNEAtRdI�IdOtIPlBs ' '�,• aA NQ 4 fod °!� � �( � 11 -,� / �n��) 1�7 i� L!I� �C�ti ell_.• � 1! � �� i �Y - ��1�:r,,, � IIris ,�I �(v(�{Rg�tiC �.��� � � • ' �v � ���'�.`�. GoAt se, THE SITE so em- t r 1 S I ' FIGURE 1 : LOCUS MAP N� Scale: 1' = 2083' Base Map: USGS Topographic Map FIGURE 2: PLOT PLAN 0 404 6�O 75 Base Map: LEA, Inc. Scale: 10 loo' E 4mm N �C X c6 Ct LLJ nnN S02.53'3O-C 182,70' Engineers d Environmental Planners , It \ \ a, \ k (' I 1 1 \ I 11 i FIGURE 3: TOPOGRAPHY N� Scale: 1'= 200' Base Map: City Topographic Map il ' ' ffifimD &nl Engineers&Environmental Planners Groundwater on the Site is near the original ground surface. A ' 1983 drainage study of the area performed by Robert E. Maschi of Framingham, Massachusetts indicates drainage at the Site flows in a southerly direction. No buildings are located on the Site and there are no utilities to the Site. A chain link fence with a locking gate is located along the eastern boundary of the Site. Vehicular access to ' the site is through the gate. . ' Historical Ownership and Uses of the Site No buildings other than a small stone building, which is no longer present, have been located on the Site within the last 50 years. It has historically been an undeveloped wetland area. 1968-Present: Joseph G. Ra one ' During this period, filling operations on the Site were undertaken to alter the topography such that development of the Site would be possible. Filling began in 1976 with the ' placement of sandy fill obtained from a building excavation in Salem on the northeastern part of the Site. In 1983, a ledge, ridge in the central part of the Site was blasted and the ' resulting rocks were used to fill the northeastern and eastern ^ portions of the Site. In 1984 , the eastern portion of the Site was filled with various materials provided by various contractors. This fill consisted mainly of gravel, pavement; concrete, and building demolition debris. The above comprise the major filling events. Smaller amounts of fill were placed on the Site at other times. The Salem Conservation Commission did not approve of all the fill materials placed on the Site, beginning in 1977. In 1977, ' the Commission deemed that some of the fill contained "inappropriate materials" and required that this fill be removed. Further details on this fill are unavailable. In ' June 1984 , two other types of fill used on the Site were similarly deemed inappropriate and removed from the Site. Six to ten loads of fill originated from New England Power Company and contained coal dust. Two loads of oil-contaminated soil ' which originated from a gas station excavation were also used as fill. An oil and grease analysis of samples of this fill showed it to contain 300-1100 milligrams per kilograms of dry weight. The above fill has recently been removed from the Site. ' _ 6 _ ' MEW LOODYafta Engineers Q Environmental Planners i Between 1970 and 1980, the Site was used to store heavy ' construction equipment and steel beams. The fence on the eastern boundary of the Site was installed in 1977 at the request of the Salem Board of Health to prevent illegal dumping ' on the Site. The Site had long been used for disposing of appliances and other solid waste. Further details on the types of materials dumped are not available. ' A stone building with approximate dimensions of 15 feet by 25 feet was present on the Site when Joseph G. Ragone purchased it in 1968 . The building, located in the center of the Site, was demolished in 1983 . Various solid waste items are presently located on the Site. These include bulldozer buckets, empty underground storage ' tanks, a home heating oil truck tank, 55-gallon drums, car wheels, burnt timbers and other materials. The empty underground storage tanks were removed from a gas station, ' capped, and transported to the Site in 1970. (See "Site Inspection" below for further details. ) ' Before 1968 : The Site was used for farming during this period. The stone building previously mentioned was used as a stable. The pond on the Site came into existence around 1950. It was reportedly indirectly created by the disposal of ash from the City' s incinerator just north of the Site on the City land surrounding ' the incinerator. Current and Historical Uses of Adjacent Properties The following properties abut or are located near the Site. They are shown on Figure 4 , Adjacent Properties, which ' follows. All the parcels are located on the Salem Assessor' s Map Number 7. ' Parcel 68, 9 . 2 Acres - 12 Swampscott Road, City of Salem (Solid Waste Transfer Station) . The property abuts the northern part of the Site and lies upgradient from it. It is occupied by a ' solid waste transfer station. The building is located on the northeast corner of the property. Trucks deliver solid waste to the station where it is compacted and transported to the Haverhill landfill. There is a weigh station on the property ' which is used by solid waste trucks and other types of trucks ' - 7 - Engineers @ Environmental Planners - 1 e .1 68 1 � Solid Waste y Y y}r l 1 Transfer Station r Y X A•� � ) +�ty�t. S $ �A 1 � v THE SITE x� Ny i v 1 ,•e. _ \� A F h � - '" McSweeney 1 - tX 3 -nS .,6 51 Auto Body I.iAc. 64 1 s Ingemi n eH.31 11\`. 1 1 FIGURE 4: ADJACENT PROPERTIES 1 NI Scale: 1'= 200Base Map: City Assessor's Map 1 J Engineers&Environmental Planners t as well. The transfer station has been operating since the ' early 1970 ' s. A 1000 gallon steel underground storage tank for fuel oil was installed in 1971. No problems with this tank have been reported to City officials. This is -the only underground storage tank located in the vicinity of the Site. ' Prior to the early 1970 ' s, the property was occupied by a City incinerator. The incinerator started operating in 1961 , when ' the brick building was constructed. Ash from the incinerator was disposed of on much of the incinerator property, including that near the Site. When the facility was converted to a transfer station in the early 1970 ' s, the fly ash deposits were covered and sealed according to State specifications. Parcel 67, 0. 3 Acres - 36 Swam scott Road, Colonial Realty ' Trust Company. This property lies upgradient from the Site, abutting its northern boundary. It is a small parcel of open land which may have been used for fly ash disposal. ' Parcel 50, 1. 2 Acres - 15 Cedar Road, Esther Dennison This property abuts the west central corner of the Site and lies upgradient from it. It consists of wooded undeveloped land. ' (Cedar Road, shown on Figure 4, does not exist. ) Parcel 51, 4. 1 Acres - 18 Cedar Road John M In emi This ' parcel abuts the Site to the west and lies downgradient from it. It consists of wetland and contains no buildings. Fill has been placed on this property in the past, often without required permits. Eight or nine years ago, the Salem Conservation Commission issued a cease and desist order on filling on this property. Most of the fill consisted of remains of automobiles, primarily automobile interiors. ' Laboratory analyses performed on this fill at the request of the Conservation Commission indicate that the rate of release , of hazardous materials from the fill increases with time rather� t� ' than decreases. Further details on the specific contaminants CC involved are not available. Most, but not all, of this fill has been removed. ' Parcel 60 , 42. 2 Acres - 58 Swampscott Road, Helen S King. This property abuts the Site on its southern boundary and lies slightly upgradient from it. This large parcel is undeveloped ' and consists partly of wetland. The property has long been used for solid waste dumping. t - 9 - Engineers @ Environmental Planners 1 1 Parcels 64 and 65, 2.1 Acres - 54-56 Swampscott Road, A&J 1 Realty Trust (J. McSweeney Auto Body) . These parcels abut the Site on its southern boundary and lie downgradient from it. A building, near Swampscott Road, has been occupied by J. McSweeney Auto Body Shop for approximately one- year. No 1 underground storage tanks are present on the Site according to the records of the Salem Fire Prevention Officer. Car repairs are performed here. Prior to this occupancy, the property was 1 used for storing heavy equipment by the former owner who was in the construction business. There is no water or sewer service to this property. 1 Parcels 43 and 69, 42 . 2 Acres - First Street, Hi bland Realty Trust. These parcels abut the eastern portion of the Site on the easterly side of Swampscott Road, lying upgradient from 1 it. They consist of wooded open land. They are part of a larger area currently under development. 1 Site Inspection The Site was inspected on November 13, 1984 by Ellen E. Moyer of Rizzo Associates. The weather was cold and windy, with temperatures around 40 degrees. 1 The inspection began in the northeast corner of the Site and proceeded counterclockwise around the perimeter of the Site. Finally the central area of the Site was inspected, proceeding 1 in a clockwise direction. Debris was noted along the stream on the northern part of the Site. Included were several rusted drums of various sizes and/ 1 rusted appliances. An oily sheen was observed on the water surface in stagnant areas. Vegetation appeared healthy. 1 On the western part of the Site just east of the pond, rusted debris included two undergrouind storage tanks, a tank from a home heating oil delivery truck, several truss-shaped objects, 1 and a bulldozer bucket. Rusted appliances were observed around the perimeter of the pond. Most of them were rusted beyond recognition. One object at the northern end of the pond looked like a 55-gallon drum. r 1 1 1 - 10- Engineers&Environmental Planners On the west side of the pond where the second stream enters the pond from the west, an oily sheen was observed in areas where ' the water was stagnant. An oily sheen was likewise observed near the third stream which drains the pond on the south end of the Site. A small rusted tank was observed on the edge of this ' stream. The wetland area in the southeastern portion of the Site appeared healthy. No oil sheens were observed on the standing ' water and the vegetation was dense and apparently healthy. The sides of the filled area in the northeast part of the Site ' were inspected. Fill consisted largely of rocks which resulted from blasting the ledge area in the southern central part of p the Site. Most of the fill consisted of topsoil, sand, and [ip other soils. Some of the fill consisted of construction t debris, including timbers, bricks and granite blocks. None of the various fill materials smelled or looked—like they migh -- contain hazardous materials. One filled area on the south ' central part of the Site was dark in color. This was the area where the fill containing coal ash, now removed, had been. A small amount of remaining coal was the cause of the dark color. 1 The top of the filled area was inspected with no evidence of oil or hazardous materials observed. Observation Well Installation Four observation wells were installed on the Site by Robert Seymour and George Junta of Soil Exploration of Stow, Massachusetts on November 13 , 1984. The locations of the wells ' are shown on Figure 5, Well Locations, which follows. Wells 1, 2, and '3 are located in the upgradient part of the Site while Well 4 has a downgradient location in the southern part of the Site. Soil borings were also undertaken at this time for the ' purpose of characterizing soils and locating bedrock. Soil samples were collected at five foot intervals during the ' construction of the wells. Soil boring logs for each well follow Figure 5. Drilling at each well proceeded to a depth of five feet below the depth at which groundwater was first ' encountered. ' - 11- FIGURE 5: WELL LOCATIONS 200"E 9316.75 s� y Base Map: LEA, Inc. /�yl Scale: 1 " — 100' ' al m . W ✓ m o a m n s m N m •^ m t ^ R11. a M ry N N � •u Z ' u F • U � � � b V v 52'20"E .E _n N ' 52o•3e'5o a max.. v W ELL 1 F. 142.09 ;r ^ y WELL 4 �� u ➢ ' \�\ (D WE L L 2 Sys 1 \ cam'" ZI 1 � l (DWELL 3n � W s c6 LJ Lti 1 OX s�• a L'i Rn � 4 .5 10• 4.gym,:C y ^ r 2�0 06, 11 O��Oi 9 h h M S�r n Z o 502.53.30.E 182.70' 1 NOV. 1 6 1984 425 TAYLOR ETTSROASOIL EXPLORATION CORPORATION 231NGA, NHLS 0306 TREET STOW, MASSACHUSETTS 01775 NASHUA, NH 03D60 (617)897-8737 TEST BORINGS GEOLOGICAL CONSULTING (603)962-3601 ' To Rizzo Associates Date 11/15/84 Job No. 84-341 Location_ Swami cnntt Road , Salam MA Scale 1" = 6 h. ' Test Boring S-OW-1 Observation Well 11/12/84 010" Ground Surface 0'0" Firm, moist, fine to medium sand, 4-5-5 some inorganic silt, little fine to 116" medium gravel, crushed brick and concrete, trace metal. (Fill. ) 4'011 30-7-7 5'6" ' 71011 Soft, wet, or anic silt and very 81611 fine sand, li tie eat and root mat- ter, trace me ium o coarse sand. 7-3-2 ' 1010" lo'0" Hard to compact, wet, fine sand, little inorganic silt, trace medium sand. 14'0" 1410" 120/0" Refusal at 1410" 120/0" with 1409 hammer and with hollow stem auger. ' Installed Observation Well Materials used: Point at 13'6" ' 1 2" threaded PVC end plug Water level at 710" 1 10' x 2" threaded slotted P upon completion. 1 5' x 2" threaded blank PVC ' 1 2" PVC cap 1 Silica Sand - bag 1 Bentonite Pellets - pail Standard Penetration Test - 140N hemmer felling 30" - Blows ere per 6"taken with 18" long x 2"O.D. x 1-3/8" I.D.Split Spoon Sampler unless otherwise noted. ' Type of Boring-2%"Casing ❑ 3Y2"Casing ❑ Hollow Stem Auger 0 Solid Stem Auger ❑ Note, Water levels indicated may vary with seasonal fluctuation and the degree of•oil saturation when the boring was tak on.The following terms used In the so', descriptions are based on visual Identification:Trace 0-10%, little or few 1020%,Some 20-40%, and 40-50%. - 425 TAYLOR ROAD 23INGALLS STREET STOW. MASSACHUSETTS 01775 SOIL EXPLORATION CORPORATION NASHUA, NH 03060 [6171997-8737 TESTBORINGS s GEOLOGICAL CONSULTING (90318823601 To Rizzo Associates Date 11/15/84 Job No. 84-341 Location Swamnscott Road Salem MA Scale 1" = 6 ft. ' Test Boring S-OW-2 Observation Well 11/12/84 ' 010" Ground Surface 010" 9-24_120/0" Firm to hard, damp to moist, fine 11011 sand, some inorganic silt, little ' fine to medium gravel and crushed brick, trace wood and metal matter. 41611 (Fill. ) 51611 4-8 5'6" 6'0" 18 Compact, wet, fine sand, some inor- ganic silt, trace medium sand. 9'611 t 10'6" 101611 19-36 11'0" 111011 -17 inorganic silt, trace fine gravel. End of boring 11'0" Installed Observation Well Materials used: Point at 9'6" 1 2" threaded PVC end plug ' Water level at 3'11" 1 5' x 2" threaded slotted PVC upon completion. 1 5' x 2" threaded blank PVC 1 2" PVC cap ' 1 Silica Sand - bag 1 Standard Penetration Test - 140M hemmer felling 30" - Blows are per 6" taken with 18" Iona x2"O:D. x 1-3/8" I.D.Split Spoon Sampler unless otherwise notes. ' Type of Boring -2%" Casing ❑ 3'/2" Casing ❑ Hollow Stem Auger P Solid Stem Auger 0 Notes - Water levels Indicated may very with seasonal fluctuation and the degree of Goll saturation when the boring was taken. The following terms used In the so'^ descriptions are based on visual Identification! Trace 0 10%,little or few 1020%,Some 2040%. and 40-50%. O425 TAYLOR ROAD 23 INGALLS STREET STOW, MASSACHUSETTS 01775 SOIL EXPLORATION CORPORATION NASHUA, NH 03060 ' (6171697-6737 TEST BORINGS a GEOLOGICAL CONSULTING (6031 BB2-3601 To Rizzo Associates Date 11/15/84 Job No. 84-341_ Location Swampscott Road, Salem, MA Scale 1" t Test Boring S-OW-3 Observation Well 11/12/84 ' 010" Ground Surface 010" r Tonara moist tine sand, some 7-9-7 ingr anic sift, lit?le fine sand and 116" ' 216n bric� trace metal and concrete mat- Har to compact, wet, fine to medium sand, some inorganic silt, trace 41611 _13- 5'0" fine 5'0" Compact? wet, fine sand, some inor- 5,91, 20-60/3" ' 6110' garlic silt, trace medium to c ' Refusal at 6'10" with hollow stem auger. ' Installed Observation Well Materials used: point at 6'10" 1 2" threaded PVC end plug Water level at 3'11" 1 10' x 2" threaded slotted P upon completion. 1 2" PVC cap 1 1 1 1 Standard Penetration Test - 140N hammer falling 30" - Blows ere per 5" taken with 18" long a 2"O.D. a 1.3/8" I.D.Split Spoon Sampler unless otherwise notes ' Type of Boring-2Yt" Casing ❑ 3%"Casing ❑ Hollow Stem Auger y Solid Stem Auger ❑ Notes water levels indicated may very with seasonal fluctuation and the degree of toll saturation when the boring was taken. The following terms used In the so" descriptions ere based on visual Identification: Trace 0 10%, little or few 1020%,Some 20-40%,and 4050%. 425 TAYLOR ROAD 23INGALLS STREET STOW, MASSACHUSETTS 01775 SOIL EXPLORATION CORPORATION NASHUA, NH 03060 [6171897-8737 TEST BORINGS a. GECLOGIC4L CONSULTING (6031882-3601 tTo Rizzo Associates Dote 11/15/84 Job No. 84-341 Location Swampscott Road, Salem MA Scale 1" t ' Test Boring S-OW-4 Observation Well 11/12-19/84 ' 0'011 Ground Surface 010" 6-6-26 Firm to hard, dampto moist fine sand, some inorganic silt, little 116" fine to medium gravel, brick and ' 31611 concrete and Soft, wQt inorganic silt some fine 41611 sand, lit?le peat and roof matter, 4-3-5 6'0'1 trace medium sand. 610" Hard to compact, wet fine sand, little inorganic sil�, little fine gravel. 9LOI1 n 120/las 9 1 1 1 Refusal at 91111 ' 120/0" with 140# hammer and refusal with auger. Installed Observation Well Materials used: point at 91011 1 2" threaded PVC end plug Water level at 6'1" 1 5' x 2" threaded slotted PVC t upon completion. 1 5' x 2" threaded blank PVC 1 2" PVC cap 1 Silica Sand - bag 1 1 Standard Penetration Ten 1400 hemmer falling 30" - Blows ere per 6" taken with 18" Iona x 2"O.D, x 1-3/8" I.D.Split Spoon Sampler unless otherwise notes. ' Type of Boring- 2'h" Casing ❑ 3%" Casing ❑ Hollow Stem Auger 0 Solid Stem Auger ❑ Notes - Water levels indicated may vary with seasonal fluctuation and the degree of soil saturation when the boring was tak on.The following terms used in the soi descriptions are basad on visual Identification:Trace 0 10%,little or few 1020%,Some 20-40%,and 40-50%. Em Engineers&Environmental Planners Sample Collection and Laboratory Analysis ' Groundwater samples were collected from each well using a bailer and soil samples were collected as described above. Surface water samples were collected from each of the three ' streams using a bailer. These unpreserved samples were refrigerated and delivered to the laboratory for analysis the next morning. The laboratory, Toxikon of Norwood, ' Massachusetts, filtered and preserved the samples and analyzed them for the eight heavy metals listed in RCRA and the thirty-one volatile organic compounds on the U.S. Environmental ' Protection Agency Priority Pollutant List of 129 compounds. Table 1 shows the results of analyses of groundwater and surface water samples for the eight RCRA metals. Samples from ' Wells 1, 2, and 3 were composited into one upgradient sample. As a comparison, also shown are the maximum concentrations allowed in drinking water by the SDWA. All metal t concentrations in the samples are below the limit and are acceptable for drinking water. The only metals with concentrations higher than the detection limits of the method are barium in the surface water, cadmium in Well 4, and lead in ' the surface water. The concentrations are all within acceptable limits. Table 2 shows the results of Extraction Procedure (EP) Toxicity -na ses of soil samples. Two samples were analyzed, one a composite<.f samples from Wells 1, 2, and 3 collected from a to 5-1/2 feet and the other a sample from Well 4 also collected from a depth of 4 to 5-1/2 feet. In the EP toxicity analysis, metals are leached from the soil and their concentrations in the leachate are then measured. If any of ' the concentrations exceeds a value equal to 100 times the drinking water standard, the soil is considered hazardous. These hazardous concentrations are shown on Table 2 . Barium, ' lead, and selenium were found in concentrations above their detection limits but well below the hazardous threshold. Concentrations in the upgradient composite sample were greater ' than those in the downgradient sample for each of the three metals. A possible source of these heavy metals for the Site is the incinerator fly ash deposits located north of the Site. ' Table 3 shows the results of analyses of groundwater, surface water, and soil samples for volatile organic contaminants. Soil samples were obtained from a depth of 4 to 5-1/2 feet at 'j1W ' each well location. There was only one instance in which a ' - 17- v � O LlLLLl4o Engineers&Environmental Planners TABLE 1 ' Analysis of Groundwater and Surface Water Samples for Heavy Metals ' Constitutent Composite Well 4 North West South Maximum from Stream Stream Stream Allowed Wells Entering Entering Leaving in Drinking ' 1, 2 & 3 Pond Pond Pond Water (mg/1) (mg/1 ) (mg/1) (mg/1) (mg/1) (mg/1) Arsenic <0. 005 <0. 005 <0. 005 <0. 005 <0. 005 0. 05 Barium <0. 05 <0. 05 0 . 42 0. 37 0. 13 1. 0 Cadmium <0. 002 0. 003 <0. 002 <0. 002 <0. 002 0. 01 Chromium <0. 002 <0. 002 <0. 002 <0. 002 <0. 002 0. 05 Lead <0. 002 <0. 002 <0. 005 0. 004 0 . 005 0. 05 Mercury <0. 0005 <0. 0005 <0. 0005 <0. 0005 <0. 0005 0. 002 Selenium <0. 005 <0. 005 <0. 005 <0. 005 <0. 005 0. 01 ' Silver <0. 002 <0 . 002 <0. 002 <0. 002 <0. 002 0. 05 Reference: For mercury, Method EPA SW-7470 and Alpha 303 in Standard ' Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, AWWA, 1981 and for the other metals, Method EPA SW-3020 in Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, USEPA, 1982. t - 18- Engineers&Environmental Planners ' TABLE 2 ' EP Toxicity Analysis of Soil Samples ' Upgradient Soil Composite Downgradient RCRA from Wells Soil Sample Hazardous Constituent 1, 2 , and 3 From Well 4 Concentration Arsenic (mg/1) <0. 10 <0. 10 5 Barium (mg/1) 3. 59 3. 46 100 Cadmium (mg/1 ) <0. 10 <0. 10 1 Chromium (mg/1 ) <0. 10 <0. 10 5 Lead (mg/1 ) 0. 49 0. 14 5 Mercury (mg/1) <0. 0005 <0 . 0005 0 . 2 Selenium (mg/1) 0. 11 <0 . 10 1 Silver (mg/1) <0. 10 <0. 10 5 ' Reference: Methods EPA SW-1310 and EPA SW-6010 in Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, USEPA, 1982 . ' - 19- Engineers$Enaim.mental Planners TABLE 3 Analysis of Groundwater, Surface Water, and Soil Samples for Volatile Organic Contaminants ' Wells Well Wells Streams Constituent 1 2 3 4 North West South 1, 2, 3 4 ' Acrolein ND* ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Acrylonitrile ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ' Benzene ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Carbontetrachloride ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Chlorobenzene ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1, 2-Dichloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1, 1 , 1-Trichloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1, 1-Dichloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1, 1, 2-Trichloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ' 1, 1, 2-2-Tetrachloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Chloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 2-Chloroethylvinyl ether ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Chloroform ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1,1-Dichloroethylene ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1, 2-Trans-dichloroethylene ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1, 2-Dichloropropane ND ND ND ND ND ND 14D ND ND ' Cis-1, 3-Dichloropropene ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Ethylbenzene ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Methylene Chloride ND ND ND 19 ppb ND ND ND ND ND ' Methyl Chloride ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Methyl Bromide ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Bromoform ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Bromodichloromethane ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Trichlorofluoromethane ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Dichlorodifluoromethane ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Tetrachloroethylene ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ' Toluene ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Trichloroethylene ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Vinyl Chloride ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ' Xylene ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND *ND - Not Detectable. The detection limit for water samples was 5 parts per billion (ppb) and the detection limit for soil samples was 50 ppb. Reference : Method EPA 601/602 in Methods for Organic Chemical Analysis, USEPA, 1983. - 20- Engineers$Environmental Planners t ' contaminant was found with a concentration exceeding the detection limit. The water sample from Well 4 contained methylene chloride at a concentration of 19 parts per billion ' (ppb) . This concentration is well below the health advisory level of 13, 000 ppb for a one-day exposure, 1, 300 ppb for a ten-day exposure, and 150 ppb for a chronic exposure. Methylene chloride is a colorless liquid commonly found in ' degreasing and cleaning compounds. A possible source of this contaminant for the Site is the auto body shop located just south of the Site. ' Findings Relative to the Presence of Oil or Hazardous Materials Laboratory analysis for heavy metals and volatile organic contaminants were performed on Site groundwater, surface water, and soil samples. These particular analyses were chosen ' because contamination from fill materials located both on the Site and on surrounding properties would be expected to contain heavy metals and/or volatile organic compounds. While several ' contaminants were detectable, namely barium, cadmium, lead, selenium, and methylene chloride, their concentrations were in every case low. No SWDA, RCRA, or Health Advisory standards were exceeded. Drinking water standards are especially ' important in this case because water flows from the Site to a reserve drinking water supply located one mile south of the Site. ' Filling has occurred at various times on the Site, the City Solid Waste Transfer Station abutting it to the north, and the ' Ingemi property abutting it to the west. Some of the fill materials have contained hazardous materials. Much of this / fill has been removed, and the incinerator fly ash deposits c / , have been sealed. Some potentially hazardous fill reportedly remains on the Ingemi property. Laboratory results, however, indicate that contaminants have not migrated to the Site to a significant extent. Contaminant concentrations in Site water ' and soil samples were all within acceptable limits. It has been a pleasure providing these services to you. Feel ' free to call if you have any questions. Yours truly, Ellen E. Moyer ' Environmental Engineer Reviewed by: William J. Rizzo, Jr. , President - 21- I, Engineers&Environmental Planners List of Contacts ' 1. Mr. Richard Ragone, Owner of Site 2. Mr. Richard MacIntosh, Building Inspector, City of Salem ' 3. Mr. Robert Blenkhorn, Health Agent, City of Salem 4. Ms. Susan Madison, former Conservation Commission Planning ' Aide, City of Salem 5 . Ms. Dale Yale, Conservation Commission Planning Aide, City ' of Salem 6. Mr. Norman LaPointe, Fire Prevention Inspector, City of Salem 7. Mr. Albert Hayden, Sanitary Engineer, Northeast Regional Office, Massachusetts DEQE ' 8. Mr. John Gallo, Solid Waste Transfer Station, City of Salem 9. Katherine D. Walker, Health and Safety Officer, Metcalf & Eddy, Boston ' - 22- XON �JASO1Nlxa Do�Sr Titiy of ttlettt, Mtts'gttr4usettli +73eportmeni of Pub it Marks Otte Salem (1ireett ANTHONY V. FLETCHER, R.P.E. WILLIAM F. HAIGHT, JR. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SERVICES ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SERVICES CITY ENGINEER May 18, 1983 T0: CONSERVATION COMMISSION FROM: A. V. FLETCHER SUBJECT: RAGONE PROPERTY I have reviewed the Ragone property with Sue Madison and find everything in order, with the exception of a planned method of construction and supervision or control . Without question, the new flow channel should be constructed prior to any other activities, including fill storage as is occurring presently. My other reservation is control . Who is responsible, during construction, in seeing that the work will be carried out to planned elevations and conditions. Ow o e ffm JUL29i985 Engineers and Environmental Planners SALEM PLANNING DEPT. 235 West Central Street, Natick, Massachusetts 01760 (617)651-3401 July 24, 1985 Ms. Dale E. Yale Staff Advisor Planning Commission City of Salem One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Dear Dale, The site development work on the Ebershoff Property is continuing on schedule. The fill material on the site has been exposed, and although much debris (stumps, steel and concrete) has been found and removed, no hazardous material has been uncovered. The pond on the site has been lowered in order to place the rip-rap along the banks and to place the culvert that will form that pond outlet. Lowering the pond has exposed debris consisting primarily of metal and wood. We are now in the process of cleaning the pond of this debris. If you have any questions or comments at this point in the project please contact me. Sincer ely, Richard A. Moore, P.E. RAM/dmd/EB2 cc: David Ebershoff 1 G�- 73 DOLBEN R EC E E FEB 11 1991 February 8, 1991 SALB,'] PEANNEm G DEPT. a Ms. Julie Remenschneider Salem conservation Commission One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 RE: 38 Swampscott Road Salem, MA Dear Julie: Per your request, we have received the attached sealed opinion from Rizzo Associates that the above referenced facility conforms to the plans. I believe this was the remaining item needed for issuance of the Certificate of Compliance. Please advise me if you require anything further. Vertruly ours, Dona d C. Do Receiver for Rocky Mountain Real Estate Trust I cc: Susan Rosenberg Robert Pomerene, Esq. 75 State Street Telephone Fax Boston,Massachusetts 02109 617 737-1400 617 737-1851 j . J �•®�„ • is DOLBEN September 27, 1990 Mr. John Vallis Chairman Salem Conservation Commission One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 RE: 38 Swampscott Road Salem, MA Dear Mr. Vallas: On May 1, 1990 I was appointed by the court as Receiver for Rocky Mountain Real Estate Trust I, the owner of the above real estate. I should like meet with the commission at the earliest possible date to discuss what may be necessary to obtain a Certificates of Compliance for the two outstanding Orders of Conditions. There has been some examination into the subject by Rizzo Associates and by Goldberg-Zoino Associates on behalf of Far West Savings and Loan Association, the first mortgagee. I expect to be able to come to the meeting with reasonable knowledge of all materials that are available today. Clearly this matter needs to be addressed to clear the title for the upcoming sale. Very truly yours, L- Donald C. Do ben Receiver for Rocky Mountain Real Estate Trust I DCD/eeb cc: Susan Rosenberg Robert Pomerene, Esq. William H. Dolben&Sons, Inc. 75 State Street Telephone Fax Realtors Boston, Massachusetts 02109 617 737-1400 617 737-1851 PERKINS, SMITH & COHEN A Partnership Induding Professional Corporations ONE FEDERAL STREET, BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02110 (617)426-8900 RICHARD A.HOWARD ROBERT J.SHEA TELECOPIER WASHINGTON,OC.OFFICE. NORMAND F.SMITH,III NANCY G.0DONNELL (617)542-3619 2555 M STREET.N.W. FRANCIS E.PERKINS.JR, LESLIE RATLEY BEACH . WASHINGTON,DC,20037 GABLETEG HLAW JERRY COHEN.P C. SUSAN M.KELLEY 12021785-0773 IRVING SALLOWAY SUSAN E.STENGER TELECOPIER LAWRENCE G.GREEN 12021223-6307 HARVEY M.BURG.P.L. OF COUNSEL ANDREW S.KROTINGER WILLIAM M.SIMMONS NORTH SHORE OFFICE'. JAMES AG.HAMILTON JAMES IT HOPKINS 990 PARADISE ROAD ROBERT J.POMERENE WILLAM F.JEFFERY,JR. SWAMPSCOTT,MAO 1907 RILHAPO L MILLER DAVID M.WEINSTEIN 16171599-8198 EMARDN.PERRY HARVEY NAYE- TELECOPIER IRA M.SHOOLMAN 161 G 590-.6W BETSY L.WOLF JONATHAN C.GUEST ADNIl [o ONLY INOC CHARLES F.ELMES(1933.19051 May 3, 1991 JOHN L.LYMAN(191ST986) Ms . Julie Remenschneider Salem City Hall Salem Conservation Commission 93 Washington Street Salem, MA 01970 Re : Certificate of Compliance for Wetlands Protection Act DEP File No. 64-73 Dear Julie : As we discussed over the telephone, I am sending you enclosed a copy of the referenced Certificate of Compliance marked with changes that need to be made, along with the Receiver' s check for $40 .00 for the filing fee and the Receiver' s cover letter to the Land Court Registry. Please have the marked changes made on the original of the Certificate of Compliance which you have (or obtain a new signed Certificate of Compliance incorporating these changes) , and file same with the Land Court Registry District in Salem. When you file, please bring an extra copy of the Certificate of Compliance so it can be marked by the clerk with the filing information . Please send me a copy of the document with the filing information noted on it . Thank you for your assistance on this matter. Very�ultruly yo rs, e144 Robert JrPomerene cc: Mr. Donald C. Dolben (w/enc . ) rl Enclosures : Certificate of Compliance { -- . Check Receiver' s Cover Letter RJP/lt Remenschneider/4957-2 yyyy t Cj= *;ENT IN3. '2 G / G 310 Ch1R 10.99 Form 8 DEP File No 64-73 ° m = N E i'fo oe orovioec Dv DEP) 7 0. w o n Commonwealth ars lover c 1 cm ' y Of Massachusetts Aooucanl David T . Fh rsho o WN. n w rD -— n. r a M m n g n Certificate of Compliance N Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act, G.L. c. 131, §40 7 ° N l 0 H 1 O Go 7 < H. From Salem Conservation Cnmmiasinn IssuingAuthoPi'fy �• rr w rt r• r H. o To David L. Ebershoff c/o Donald C. Dolben, 75 State St. Boston, Ma. 02109 °o o 0 m n a (Namel (Addressi m °a M n e m w o m r7, Date of issuance Fehrrnnrg 11A, i QQ1 ON o H. n n 0 0 m p 7 This Certificate is issued for work regulated by an Order of Conditions issued to David L. Ebershof ,f• O 7 rt dated 3/19/85 andlssuedbythe Salem Cnnservation p Commission and filed with the Essex County Southern Registry District of tib w m Land Court as Document No. 2012090 ~ 1 . It is hereby certified that the work regulated by the above-referenced Order of Conditions has w c m �-n N been satisfactorily completed. H. E c n w m w n a 2. = It is hereby certified that only the following portions of the work regulated by the above•refer• ^ N 0 enced Order of Conditions have been satisfactorily completed: (It the Certificate of Compliance 0 y ° does not include the entire project.specify what portions are included.) rt Q 7 (D z H- W (D H• N n z rt o � w u dao F W O 3. _ It is hereby certified that the work regulated by the above-referenced Order of Conditions was n never commenced.The Order of Conditions has laosed and is therefore no toncer valid. No future O w work subject to regulation unser the Act may be commenced without filing a new Notice of Intent n m - R and receiwnc a new Order of Conditions. _ m p o � 1Leave Soace Blank) n n n 1 R N z 0 00 7 OD it 0, � M8Y — 61991co } � V QA� W Effective 11/10189 a, This certificate snail be recorded in the Registry of Deeds or the land Court for the district in which the land is located. The Order was originally recorded on April 11 , 1985 (date) at the Registry of Southern Fccax ac TlnrttmanLBOOk110.10I71f1. Page Y1iCt'1Modif-red DDCVftVAF No. 187873 recorded on May 17 , 1983 w 5. _ The following conditions of the Order snail continue: (Settorth any conditions contained in the m Final Order. such as maintenance or monitoring, which are to continue for a longer period.) rt 0 O n rt w 3 O Issued by SALEM CONSERVATION COMMISSION m CL 0 rt ':anature(s) w w r o 7 ze Go i 7 m r w 0 .n When issued by the Conservation Commision this Certificate must be signed by a majority of is members. z On this day of- d��L6GC�iL�/ - 119 before me w N personally appeared n-/'����Y� �1 %/��i , to me known to be the person descrioed ip and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she executed the same as hismer free ant and deed. w n w 7 // R o 2L�; C�1' ct';It vnf f�e � i99� r' Notary ubli My comm! sion expires 0 n 0 a w detach on dotted line and submit to the _ N 7 .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. n ro To Issuing Autnonty Please be advised may me Certificate of compliance forme protectat: File Numder las oeen recorded at the Registry of and nas dean noted in me drain of mie of:ne aoec:ed oroceRY an • 'g 1'Peco•eed Ianc.1>e'ns:rumeni rutrdel sr..c.'.:�enmies ms xansac:lon is !!registered land.:ne cacumnt numder-.vnicn identifies mis transaction s I aooticant S.gnature 8.2 Form a DEP File No. 16 4—7 3 fto he IMMKI"or DEP) c.i�,t�,,,, Salem - -_ Commonwealth of Massachusetts ..., David L . Ebershoff Certificate of Compliance -Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act, G.L. c. 131, §40 From Salem Conservation Commission Issuing Authority H n z E a n S W 0 0 W m m o l To David L . Ebershoff c/ iS Donald C . Dolben, 75 State St . , a 7 m M c n m N• .. B a r• � (Name) (Address) Boston, MA n m m n 02109 zr• Vm nr• a 0 o co r• o w o c Date of Issuance m w m n m w David L . Ebershoff r m This Certificate is issued for work regulated by an Order of Conditions issued to V n Oo < m m dated 3/ 19/85 and issued by the Salem Conservation „ m W m Nm a .o O m rt - c Commission and filed with the Essex County Southern o rD e& ct L o rt s Doclment No . 201209* 0 7� tR i s i iAe De cerjifieo that4he work regr&&1d�y t�e above•re�erenced C der of Conditions has m 0 been satisfactorily completed. r 0 n o r y, ❑ It is hereby certified that only the following portions of the work regulated by the above-refer- m ni s H. W 1 8 in o m enced Order of Conditions have been satisfactorily completed:(If the Certificate of Compliance n n. " c does not include the entire project,specify what portions are included.) ro n m m 7 Ort Nc 7 r C O n D N < n N• n m a n in C77 Him w o a UQ n c 3. ❑ Itis hereby certirred that the work regulated by the am 0 0bove•relerenced Order of Conditions was J never commenced.The Order of Conditions has lapsed and s therefore no longer valid.No future o 7 m ,work subject to regulation under the Act may be commenced without filing a new Notice of intent .. _ and receiving a new Order of Conditions. ..........._.............................................................................................. .........__........__..._... ...._....._......_... foam So an*l y B•1 -C ❑ This Certificate shah be recorded in the Registry of Deeds or the Land Court for the district in which the land is located. The Order was originally recorded on A p r i 1 11 , 19 8 5 (date) atthe Registryot Southern Essex as Docl:tment No . 201209 which m o m modified Document No . 187873 recorded on Ma�,' 1983 * rt a F 5. C The following conditions of the Order shay continue:(Set forth any Conditions Contained in the ,.. 7 ro(D rt Final Order.such as maintenance or monitoring,which are to continue for a longer period.) l'• n M M w t o o i to o rt rt ' O M b N• w � C7 00 Issued by SALEM CONSERVATION COMMISSION g0 to 0 0 o K i— M to Signaturefs) ~• w rt a T m n r rt m rn w • r• When issued by'the Conservation Commision this Certificate must be signed by a majority of is members. On this day of , t 9 ,before me Personally appeared I ,to me known to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing Instrument and acknowledged that he/she executed the same as his/her free act and deed. Notary Public My commission expires DeWitt m feted Ilse wM Submit to the To iswitp AuOtortly Phw be adAatA am ete Cobltlno of cot"Wilonce 1Q the Wawa as Gila Numbw h=Oawt recorded at er A peey of .arp tqa been txMed n tM cttrrt d oM d IM txleeted oraovty m , Is- it s11 lftmoed tion.me etatnmtent n,artbe(rrricn taiiii to ir,a npswwnH It reygtRad land.it"olx:x I?ttt rttl I"Minch xw"rhaa M oumcum e S."utre I,poYGar,t 82 RECEIVED CLEC 241990 DOLBEN SALE , PLANNING DEPT. December 19, 1990 Ms. Kathleen Winn Salem Conservation Commission One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 RE: 38 Swampscott Road Salem, MA Dear Kathy: We have received the attached opinion from Rizzo Associates that the the facility conforms to the plans. I believe this was the remaining item needed for issuance of the Certificate of Compliance. Please advise me if there are any questions needing attention. Ver truly ours, Don###ld D lben Receiver fo Rocky Mountain Real Estate Trust I cc: Susan Rosenberg Robert Pomerene, Esq. 75 State Street Telephone Fax Boston,Massachusetts 02109 617 737-1400 617 737-1851 Rizzo ASSOCIATES, INC. 235 West Central Street, Natick, MA 01760 (508)651-3401 FAX(508)651-11S9 December 13, 1990 Mr. Donald C. Dolben Receiver for Rocky Mountain Real Estate Trust I c/o William H. Dolben & Sons, Inc. 15 State Street Boston, MA 02109 Dear Mr. Dolben: A field inspection of the self storage facility at 38 Swampscott Road in Salem, Massachusetts was conducted on December 4, 1990. The purpose of the investigation was to determine if the facility has been constructed substantially in accordance with engineering plans prepared by Rizzo Associates. The plans approved by the Conservation Commission in their Order of Conditions are dated February 15, 1985. These plans were later modified (dated April 12, 1985) to eliminate the Manager's residence and the sewer pumping station, allowing for the current sewer connection by gravity. Also, the footprint of the first building was reduced. These modifications reduced the scale of the project and, if anything, reduced the potential environmental impacts originally reviewed by the Commission. The results of the investigation indicated that the facility was built in accordance with the April 12, 1985 plans and complied with the provisions of the Order of Conditions. This conclusion is based on visual observations and tape measurements at spot locations and can be summarized as follows: 1. Grading. The site was graded in accordance with the elevation indicated on the site plan. The site plan called for grades to be at their highest closest to Swampscott Road and to decrease as you go away from Swampscott Road toward the pond. No significant grading changes from the plans were observed. 2. Building Locations and Security. The four buildings have been located as proposed on the site plans. The building closest to Swampscott Road is used for a combination of storage and retail space. The back three buildings are used exclusively for self storage purposes. In addition, there is security around the facility. The security consists of a locked gate and a chain link fence. The only area that is accessible to the public is the front part of the building closet to Swampscott Road which is used for retail space. 7 RIZZO ASSOCIATES , INC . Mr. Donald C. Dolben December 13, 1990 Page 2 3. Drainage. The drainage plan calls for overland flow to catchbasins and then discharges to the brook and pond on the periphery of the site. The catchbasins and drains are located as described in the plans and drainage seems to be functioning adequately. The slopes around the perimeter of the site to the brook and pond are well stabilized and vegetated; no erosion problems were apparent. Further, the 60-inch culvert that serves as the outlet to the pond has been constructed as shown on the plans and appears to be operating adequately. 4. Wastewater. Although access was not gained to the interior of any of the buildings, the attendant at the self storage facility was interviewed. She indicated that only the front building had wastewater facilities and that they were tied in to the sewer in Swampscott Road; the back three buildings are not sewered as planned. The Salem Building Inspector, Mr. Robert Gates, was contacted and indicated that the sewer was connected as planned and that, to his knowledge, the facility is operating adequately. 5. Water Supply. There is a fire hydrant located at the entrance to the building and the water main is looped around the site as required in the site plans. In summary, based on the above inspection, the facility has been built according to the site plan. The facility has been well constructed and is well operated and the premises were extremely clean and well kept. If you have any questions, please contact me. Very truly yours, Richard A. Moore, P.E. Vice President v[.n/17e901.1.wvtxt B f RECEIVED D®LBEN N U- 1990 SALEM PLANNING DEPT. November 6, 1990 Ms. Kathleen Winn Salem Conservation Commission One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 RE: 38 Swampscott Road Salem, MA Dear Kathy: Sorry we have been playing telephone tag. As I understand our phone conversation today, there is one remaining issue in obtaining the Order of Compliance from the Conservation Commission, and that is to provide to the degree possible a certificate that the drawings submitted for the building permit accurately represent the building as it was constructed. I have engaged Rizzo Associates to undertake this assignment and am hopeful they will be able to complete this work during the month of November. Attached for your consideration is the form of the Order of Compliance as prepared by counsel for Far West Savings & Loan, the first mortgagee. Perhaps this will be helpful in saving you clerical work. Thank you for your continued courtesy as we straighten this matter out. Ve y tt��rul (,yoo/ju-�rss, Do d 'd,//CL olben Re eiver f r Rocky Mountain Real Estate Trust I cc: Susan Rosenberg Robert Pomerene, Esq. William H. Dolben&Sons, Inc. 75 State Street Telephone Fax Realtors Boston, Massachusetts 02109 617 737-1400 617 737-1851 �O, /i/ � �� yy Jr �rl Alassachasells 01900 June 15, 1984 Mr. Richard J. Ragone 437 ,Main Street Lynnfiield, MA. 01940 Dear Mr. R.agone: Pursuant to the vote taken last evening at our meeting, the fill material being stored on your property on Swampscott Road must be removed by June 28, 1984. The Cease and Desist order will remain in effect until that time and, upon the completion of the removal_ process, will be lifted. if you have any question regarding this matter, please feel free contact us. You cooperation in resolving this matter is very much appreciated. Sincerely yours, - Philip D: Moran Chairman U dey 119i?.00 MRS. `dean 1% La�hapeLLe 334 ll i.gA&nd Ave. Salem, Mg-,J,6. 09970 Oct. 9, 9983 Att. %h.t l.Li p /11o2an, ✓`' have tome new.6 �o2 you ;6� coacean,) out p to6.Lem heae .in ours yuLl�, khat you 61wald know about Sz bep/Le e meeting %hwcoday, whi cA we w.LU nod be able io a#end az we ane .Leaving ao go away folL the zueeh. A�- �h.e mee.£iruy on, S beLi.eve ua-6 Sept. 22nd a.;� 9 Salem yiceen, .i.t aaO W-IdelzA;. ood vzct;f 'Jomeiking would be done about gettcng the 17.%.1%1. She Dept. �o came and gel bleat pipe Aom under 11Lgh,&md Ave. cleaned out. So on .tfutt Monday, t,-Oo.Llow.ing phot meetiaq, ,some o�- the ©.P. ;f. mend came and ivolzhed Monday and jv-,jt ha. t' a 4 on luee. o� Sept. 27A and since Lhen, we have not Aeea Whem he/Le. %hey have noz, come back. S can ieU you now, �h what L�ey did, cleaning out .tlze guZly with a 6u-LL doc7,ez, whi.cA w-,j aLeady done by ,the IlojgLdto on;ieo.l Vzi-j jumnea ,then on %u , e.j. lheu Li.ecL e pipe out wi th a j�iAe hoAe, wh4ch d.i.d nwA.ing, and they .left and have nom come Each jiace. Oha-;6 ;rAeu, did .in buU doing the guLlry, they made a 6.i.g ho.Le thence, below the pipe, jo now � e .i j a / ea pool o� untee below the p.tpe, -io now, i;?' ,is wore :than .it uxr.6 be�oae. /he tvate z haz no place to go. S ca.Lled Az. Sd Leman, -htd ce, and S don't "firth he hnowo what to do. S told him that .i t .ii ,the pipe going undez the Highway tJ .i-, plugged up, and wzta that .i.,6 cleaned out, the uczten hay no uay to flow acct. Ul e have a p zob.Lerz .thele, and u wi U tu/zn into ;6cou6.Le -2_ u)z we aa.e on a Septic a„urtem, and i the uxltea Leve. aeachej X'e P-, then, we have deep ZzouUe. lue cuze ;icy.iap. :60 '6top any tnoubLe be�oa.e .i t ntaa;tL6, life have a pao6Lem, bzu it wLU bilm .into weal i&ouole i� the waf-ea canna :low oczt. Now dx.. &-Uemcuz seemed veno ju/zpAijed when ✓ ;�oLd him Ehnf the MOo.6e Lodge uxnt-j to 4 in aczoaj .#lze j;6zee.�& A za id we jhou ld rw,� allow .i6, bu,� we ane jtL4� LUde people and have no 4ay, ,in the ma�ue2. But we wi U ;6zy not zo Let t/zem �X- is acn,oj4 #lzeae anti L ,tlz� .pipe undea lli.�/zLand Ave. .i_o cleaned out. !;te have been hea.e 30 yuz.4. and aevea ha, that pipe been cleaned out. lite know that thea.e wL.;� be a loi o� 1Lu'ubz4h, etc. ;6r ha,JgaVzened ilze2e .in all yea/t4, jo it tui. be a b.ig paoject to do, but i,� hao ;6o be done and no:E wait zurti.l the cold weathea and �Ao.6; je;i, ia, then we tu&U be told ;tAa .i t .iA too cold to do an#t g about .it. S:6 .6hoL& L be righen cane 0� 2iglut now, not be put o any Longe1w. (1'e hope to heaa about the meeting of Oct, 6;h, we arze .6oany tAa,z we can't be theae, and ;6u .iA zuhy J am fending you tlzi� Lutea zo }lat you w.i Cl know what hao happened. ✓ Vu?h xhecy have ,t 9,f vea up, they cL� the quLbv, wh.:,ch j-, nod wherze the pa.oUem ,i_e6, i;� .ice ,the pipe. Oow that ;Elzey have made a deepen hole in },bene, ;E/2.e uxuea. .i.,, below trze pipe and_ hay no place to go. IlVe plan on being at the mee�_ing o� Oct, 20 S.in ce fizy, 1ti21U AI;U. )ean krltape.Ue P.S. S have deed to ma. hletCAe/z. and toJd h iwn about it, but. we 14M have heazd notlti.ng yet.' FENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY 29 CONGRESS STREET SALEM. MA 01970 (617) 745-4560 .lune 14 , 1954 Salem Conservation Commission One Salem Green Salem, Mass. 01970 RE : Analysis of black fill from R. Ragone property Dear Mr. Fredrickson, The material analyzed appears to be a coal or oil ash residues that had been captured and stabilized in a lagoon system. The actual ash identification would require further testing. Although the quantity of Petroleum hydrocarbons found in the fill material did not exceed D E Q E guidelines for contaminated soil , the proximity of the material to a wetland would pose a risk to surface water contamination and aquatic organism toxicity. have enclosed the analysis data and gas chromatographic spectrograph for your review. ' Very _t_rul_y yours , Bruce M Poole President - BMP/e r L i D ENGINEERING * TECHNOLOGY 29 CONGRESS ST=EET SALEM MA 01970 (617) 745-4550 Salem Conservation Committee 6/12/84 PROJ_ NO. : LABORATORY REPORT Soil Sample 406017 DEQE Limit Petroleum H drocarbons $ 0.71* 3.0 The oi.l b '9 rease".fraction of the soil sam le obta in d from the transfer station was extracted by the 5Qxhltt method (Standard Methods 503C 15th Edition) _ The non- Petroleum Hydrocarbon fraction was separated from the Petroleum Hydrocarbon fraction by silica gel _ The— analysis he_anal sis :was Derformed by G.C_ Petroleum Hydrocarbons were quantified versus "iso-octane. *7100 mg/kq - Sampled by: BB Sampled on: 6/8 Sampled R'cd: 6/8 Date Laboratory Director �hL _ DET 1 METH -I LE EtH'- 1 T IVIt1ES 50 4 S.Gt4 ^. iHL 1 DET 1 METH 2 iLE �1 �:Uti 1 t SENSITIVITIES 159 5 Syyt /SoIIL L/p(90/ C ` .-5 � lOC? .Y B - t 10. 5$ 11 . 24 4. 91 I a- t - �Q_ 17 . 90 _..meg --- ---- -----_._ - -- --- - ---- --- -- ------------- PMS `5 �% V cc: _/V .- HLl�G�9•t/- - cunnm T rnLDBmc WILLIAM 5 JOSEPH A GUERTIUEPIIN.JP JOHN E. YRFS �W J-5 /k/e CopEs WILLIAM A BELOFF NICHOLAS A.CAMPAGNA.JP. MATH EWA.OI%LATO GOLOBERG •ZOINO 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. LAWRENOEFELDMAN RICHARD F.FLANAGAN GEOTECHNICAL-GEOHYOROLOGICAL CONSULTANTS ROBERT A.XELLER MICHAEL A.POWERS // JAMES X REYNOLDS 1`FFa FFf o%'rS To �2u v E To L POOL M REYNOLDS PAUL S.��E� STEVEN J. STEVEN J. .SIOMOL CDNSIR ANTS EJA EXCUF /77i�T�S /7 G/�E /�O / f{i9Z .E��Occ S, ETµEv M SEMEEEN June 21 , 1984 File No. M-4260-C Mr. John Webster Fluor Construction 24 Fort Avenue Salem, Massachusetts 01940 Re: Interpretation of Laboratory Results for Soils Salem Harbor Station Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Webster: In accordance with your request , GZA is transmitting this report of interpretation of chemical results for soil samples collected from the Salem Harbor Power Station. On June 11,, 1984, GZA collected three composite samples of fill soils from the site of the proposed Coal Pile Run-Off Pond. Two of these samples were taken from the walls of existing excavations; one was taken from a test pit dug for this purpose. Each sample consisted of three subsamples taken from the sample ' s proximate location. The collected samples were representitive of both the depth and extent of the proposed excavation. To allow an evaluation of the possibly hazardous nature of these soils, GZA sent the samples to Resource Analysts Inc. (RAI) for chemical analysis. The samples were tested for leachable heavy metals by the EP Toxicity test as designed by the U.S.E.P.A. In addition, the samples were analyzed for Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) using the Base/Neutral Extractable Organics GC/MS EPA Method 625. These parameters were chosen because of the suspected presence of fly ash in the fill soils . Fly ash is frequently suspected of being a hazardous waste due to the possible presence of both heavy metals and PAHs. IThe results presented in the laboratory report show all metals to be below the level of detection with the exception of Barium. Barium is the most common and least toxic of the heavy metals. The Barium concentration must exceed 100 mg/l for a material to be considered hazardous ; these soils are far below these levels . These soils thus do not demonstrate potential to leach heavy metals. THE CEO BUILDING B 320 NEEDHAM STREET • NEWTON UPPER FALLS,MASSACHUSETTS 02164 • (617)969-0050 BUFFALO,NY . BRIDGEPORT.CT • VERNON.CT • MANCHESTER,NH • PROVIDENCE,RI rmP. t+L :;::i_4 L. y+.a -sF::MN'*- -. +sec„.H .. ;3•_yy V Fluor Construction - June 21 , 1984 - File No. M-4260 — Page 2 The results of the Base/Neutral Extractable Organics Analysis report the presence of five different PAHs. With the exception of phenanthrene , the PAHs are present at concentrations considered to be typical of soils from an urban environment. The concentration of phenanthrene probably reflects the presence of some coal or oil, both of which are known to contain phenanthrene. Overall the concentrations of PAHs present in the soil samples do not appear to pose a hazard to human health or the environment , and in general are not elevated above those typically found in a normal urban environment. It is GZA' s opinion based on the sample results discussed herein that the soils from the proposed excavation are not a hazardous waste , nor would they pose a threat to human health when used as a fill material as proposed. Sincerely, AOLDBERG-Z b ASS CI ES, INCD. Okun ologis,t/�ard M. Simon Associate JDG/RMS:].] Attachment: RAI Lab Report 1-ab Number: 7451-1 Sample Designation: 114260 SALEM COMPOSITE #i Date. ,.) 1.4%o4 BAS,E."P•IEUTRAL_ EXTRACTi,F?L_1= O1,:G+1,I'JIC9 CONCENTRATIOhl DE'TEC'TION LIMIT UG/G) (UG/G) 1B. fJ-i•IITROSODIMicTI-i`r'LF±IhIfdE FDL 1 E; . Gis (2-CHLOROMETHYL) ETHER FDL 1 I . ]. , 3-DICHLOROBEI'IZENE FDL 1 H. 1 , 4-DICHLOROBENZENE EDL 1 E;. I , 2--DICHLOROBEfJ7ENE FDL 1 'ic Bis (2-CHLOROIS01='RCP`i"L) ETHER FDL - 1 I. HEXACHL0R0ETHAI'JE BDL 1 N-NITr;OSODI-N-FR0PYLAMINE BDL 1 ' E; • NITROBENZENE FDL - 1 1.+? iSUPHORONE FDL_ . 1 FIS (2-CHLRORETHOXY) METHANE BDL 1 1 , 2, 4-TRICHLOROBENZENE BDL 1 NAPHTHALENE BDL 1 148. HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE BDL 1 HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE BDL 1 168. 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE BDL 1 i. 7D. DIMETHYLPHTHALATE BDL 1 813. ACENAPHTHYLENE FDL 1 1.^B. 2. 6-DINITROTOLUENE BDL 1 C!B. ACENAPHTHENE EDL 1 : I +. .2, 4-DINITROTOLUF_NE FDL 1 ---.. . DIETHYLF'HTHALATE 14DL 1 8. FL.UORENE =18. 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER BDL 1 N-NITROSO DIPHENYLAMINF_ BDL 1 :b ±. 1. , 2-DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE (AZOBENZENE) BDL 1 7B. 4-9ROMOF'HEI'•lYL PHENYL ETHER BDL 1 :c B. HEXACHLOROBENZENE DIp_ 1 PHENANTHRENE '.. 1. 1 AfJTHRA(;ENE FDL 1 3. DI-N-BUTYLF'HTHAL-ATE BDL 1 T++. FLUORANTHE'JE BENZIDINE FDI_ 1 FYRE,,IE . S . 1 BUTYI_BEiJZYLF'l-1 THALATE BDL 1 FENZO (a,) ANTHRACEfJE , 4 ' 1 ' -DICHLOR.OBENZIDEI'dE BDL CHF<`iSENF j BDL Dis (2-ETHYLHEXYI_) PHTHALATE BDL t C+. CI-fJ-CCT`iLF'HTHALi=il''c BDL iB. BEINZO (L ) f=LU0F:0ANTHFI'JE FDL 1 B. BEN ZO (k) FLUOROANTHF_NE BDL 1 BENZO (a) PYRENE BDL 1 4 �. IDENO ( 1 , 2, 3-c, d) PYRENE BDL 25 SE. DIBENZO (a, h) ANTHRACENE EDL •25 __. BENZO. (g, h, i ) PERYLENE FDL , 25 RESULTS EXPRESSED AS UG/G BDL = BELOW DETECTION LIMIT METHOD REFERENCE: EPA 600/4-79-020 METHOD 6^5 SAMPLE PREPERATION AS PER SW 846 METHOD 503() Resource Andysts, •Incorporated ��._• tit 'x; !�?4d+.�{.;sF s r is•JaemivhGlko° �'�k�MY$Yik'�wa ,-.�esc .r�� � - .t',ir3emb3.6a.4:rk 1r,hre:_iraHaC: 4'�.. r . . . . . . . . . . . L.", F :1, FJ D 0 t T 1: Z w AD w ul "- 0 M- w I]- -n -3 L.-. M - 0 M M M T M - mr- " Z Tj I I r L mf') r> • z �i cr D Pi c 1- .71 f 3 7- L-1 C: Fl 4� M 0, PI n x x -I t j fil -i W M Z Z Z I (n -n (4 -A -11 Z C 1 -4 r1l -X rrl :1i _0 T a) TI r4 pi z VJ o z -E z 1) 7, 1 :E 0 --1 1, .. , Z r- 7, :Z C) D 0 D n n -A t, - 3: 0 --A C7, ri a - --i F- 0 0 m 0 z 0 000 1 fj) C) r C) V) - t.) -,j z r- Ul ro D Z T a )l G MI T 0 77 1 t 3 C, c! 7 7 t�) N — — — cj il M tj — W P z c n -1 F 0 0 71 z 7 z T -< X1 F D --4 1 ot in r i n �-j n ( 0 M D D� 77 cr F's rn F 0 0 0 F X n Z (J) Cl --E C-1 �1'3 cr --I --i m T a -D W 0 M -n - --j ii r to - - - z T -i T --I T -D Z TZ ^407QTFrFT 0 -4 - -- -0 11 11 �; " MT -< ZXT -� mo ---) �n - mmt:) Or000r :71 33 rn En r- r r a: rz mrmmomz T _ M �n - TDOOZnr m m a3 Z -n Z w z -< Z.7 0 z 0 F --i � 0 to pi a: 71 Z . M 0 0 D --i M M m c C: 0 -1 r� 0 0 0 113 :K m X r m M 0 0 Tr Ta: -9 M T M M w C.1 IT a JM 7D 7u rn 0 x Z T :11 -1 T 0 x T ~ Z .- T 0 x pi w D T r- :1) r- r- M F 3: r- 1, X ITI P-1 ri PI z FFI D 71 D x n ci F-1 t:1 m -4 c c D 0 a C3 -4 TZO) z -i n �n 1> - 7n OT �n M a 1-4 z z r- z m 71 11 F-I P-1 PI un - rn 0 m m Z OL M Fi D < X 7, F, n m n mo b m m m x 0 0 .• rn ri) --i -i D r- N z r- Z z Z z x z z Z -< Z' Ef) M T -i - M D -4 r- M F L-j M -1 M t,4 M r1l m Fl m M m m m m --i rri D M D m D z Z M m m z Pl F z r1l :1 SIID m n, m m M, r-I m ,I U7P1 z n :U m n X -u 0. 0 In z z x -A Mi P) 7.1 z M, rrl moz m m :TJ 0 C T o r, G) M- z T (n m PI ao .13 co -4) -4 m7,I Q. 1 z Pl. Ij m PPP p. 4. 1: m r3 r-1"01 Li-i f 3, 0 -r 1-1 IZ 01 MI 0 66 GaAatzl t:, 0 cl 6 t7� rl 6 rl rl ':I Ul 0 01 1 r rr FF �� rr CO D r ,it b r) --A Lq 0 r1l F-I . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O t] f3 F) IIS Ln Lq Lq Q Sample Designatinn: - M4260 SALEM TEST PIT 7. Date: 6/ 14/84 BASE/NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT (LJG/G) (UG/r,) B. N-NITROSODIMETHYLAMINI BDL 1 D . Bis (2-CHLOROMETHYL) ETHER PDL i 1 , =-DICHLORO 9ENZENE PDL 1 IB. 1 , 4-DICHLORODENZENE 8D . 1 8. 1 , ---DICHLORO3EN7_ENE BDL i ! - Das (`-I:I ILOROIS01='ROF"iL) ETHER BDL_ i HEXACHL0R0E-1HANE BDL.- . 1 ;D. - W-N1-1ROS0DI-N-1='R0P`r'L_AI`IINE III i TF:OBEN-, ENE B'DL 1 �.�E . ISOF'H01:1CNE BDL . 1 '. 1.-!• PIS (2-CHLRORETIHOXY) METHANE BDL i .. :'.!:i. J. , . 4-rR,I l-iL01'i0F3El'JZENf= BDL- i C'"u.• NAPHTHALENE EiUL i lq. +. HEX ACHLOROB.UTAD I ENE BDL i P. HEXACHLOROCYCLOF'EP,I-rADIENE BDL i CHLORONAPHT'HALENE PDL 1 ' '• DIMF-THYLPHTHALATE BDI- :_i% . ACENn^F'HTH`iL_ENE PDL 1 6. 2. 6-DINITROTOLUENE BDL_ i I3. ACENAPHTHENE BDL 1 J. D. 2, 4-D I I'd I TROTOLIJEf•JE BDL ; . DIETHYLPHTHALATE BDL 1 3F3. FLUOF:ENE PDL 1 '4u. 4-CHLOROPHENYL RHENYL ETHER PDL . 1 d. N--NITROSO DIPHENYLAMINE PDL 1 'r:,f: . ]. , 2-D11='HEfJYI_I-�YDRAZINE (r'�`�dL-+6RIZEI'JE) PDL 1 L . 4--BROMOPHENYI_ PHENYL ETHER E+DL . 1 ^R. HEXA CHI._ORGDENZL=NE- E+DL 1 PHENANrHRENE 1 ANVHRACE11E G'DL 1 1)I-N-`UTYLPHTHAI_ATE BDL 1 F LUORAI',Il'I-1ENE 1 BEfJ-� I D I fJF_ DDL . 1 -` '�• ID.UT`rl_P.ENZ`(L_I='H71-I;LAT E BDL . 1 BENZO (a) ANTHRACENE PDL 1 - -DICHLOROBENZIDF_NE BDL . 1 CHRYSENE PDL . 1 E+is (2-ETHYLI-IEXYL-) PHTHALATE DCL 1 Dl-id-OCTYLPHTHALATE BDL i f. BENZO (b ) FLUCROANTHENE PDL 1 BENZO (L::) FLUOROANTHENE BDL 1 BEN Z0 (a) PYRENE BDL . 1 6. IDENO ( 1 , 2, 3-c, d) PYRENE BDL �B. DIBENZO (a, h) ANTHRACENE BDL , 25 6B. BENZO (g, h, i ) F'ERYLENE E+DL „"_+_ RESULTS EXPRESSED AS UG/G HDL = PELOW DETECTION LIMIT METHOD REFERENCE: EPA 600/4779-020 METHOD 625 SAMPLE PREPERATION AS PER SW 846 METHOD 5030 Resource Analysts Incorporated Yit •.Wstiv� 6+'-4ki " I�`61i1�1lr.YITMk�iRW11u" �sdteNi.Yuwel�as:mli7:�.�',:1flkL:� r SUMMARY OF EP TOXICITY TEST A. Customer Information: NAME: Goldberg Zoino Associates TECH. CONTACT PHONE ADDRESS: 1361 Elm Street ADMIN. CONTACT Manchester, New Hampshire PHONE 03101 B. Sample Information: (Customer Supplied) SAMPLE DESIGNATION: O Liquid ❑Slurry Paste Q Solid O Powder Granular. Homogenous Non-Homogenous OTHER: AMOUNT SUPPLIED: M ass A o . GRAB - COMPOSITE DESCRIBE SAMPLING AND PRESERVATION TECHNIQUES DESCRIBE THE PROCESS GENERATING THE WASTE: TAKEN BY: DATE(S) : C. Laboratory Information: supplied by Resource Analysts , Inc. DATE RECEIVED x1124 EXTRACTED ��4 SAMPLE PREPARATION: I % SOLID RESIDUE not rPnnirPA (dry) SAMPLE SIZE 113.500 WT. SOLIDS iia cn„ SOLIDS PREPARATION: the sample was subsampled and passed through a 2mm sieve VOLUME OF PRE-EXTRACTION FILTRATE 0 ml VOLUME OF WATER ADDED TO SOLIDS i TIME PH ml 0.5N Acid PH 8:55 8.38 35 4.37 9: 11 4.57 4.57 __ 9:44 4.73 4-71 10:46 4.79 16:28 5.20 7 4-RS 9:30 5.05 TOTAL VOLUME ACID ADDED 42 ml VOLUME OF WATER ADDED TO FILTERED EXTRACT 400m1 D. Analytical Information: Supplied by Resource Analysts, Inc. METALS METHOD RESULTS ANALYST ARSENIC 7060 < 0.05 SPVK BARIUM 7080 0.20 SPVK CADMIUM 7130 < 0.005 SPVK CHROMIUM 7190 < 0.01 LJC LEAD 7420 < 0.05 LJC MERCURY 7470 < 0.002 LJC SELENIUM 7740 C 0.05 SPVK SILVER 7760 < 0.008 SPVK All concentrations, where observable, confirmed by standard additions. PESTICIDES METHOD RESULTS ANALYST ENDRIN LINDANE METHOXYCHLOR TOXAPHENE 2,4-D 2,4,5-TP SILVEX All results are expressed in mg/L SUMMARY OF EP TOXICITY TEST A. Customer Information: NAME: Goldberg Zoino Associates TECH. CONTACT PHONE ADDRESS: 1361 Elm Street ADMIN. CONTACT Manchester New Hampshirp PHONE 03101 B. Sample Information: (Customer Supplied) SAMPLE DESIGNATION: ❑Liquid ❑Slurry Paste Soli P owder ❑Granular 0 Homogenous 0 Non-Ilomogenous OTPER: AMOUNT SUPPLIED: .� _8 Oz - GRAB - COMPOSITE DESCRIBE SAMPLING AND PRESERVATION TECHNIQUES DESCRIBE THE PROCESS GENERATING THE WASTE: TAKEN BY: DATE(S) : C. Laboratory Information: supplied by Resource Analysts, Inc. 'DATE RECEIVED 6/11/84 EXTRACTED 6/12/84 SAMPLE PREPARATION: I % SOLID RESIDUE not .Aq,,; ro,1 (dry) SAMPLE SIZE 116.s0a WT. SOLIDS 116 5n, SOLIDS PREPARATION: the sample was subsamol d and pass d thrntigh 2mm sieve VOLUME OF PRE-EXTRACTION FILTRATE 0 ml VOLUME OF WATER ADDED TO SOLIDS 1860ml TIME PH ml 0.5N Acid PH 9:05 6.95 15 9: 12 4 .55 -- 9:45 4.69 -- 10:47 4.90 - 1-4.90 - 16:31 4.90 -- 9:32 5.05 -- TOTAL VOLUME ACID ADDED 15 M1 VOLUME OF WATER ADDED TO FILTERED EXTRACT 4sn m1 D. Analytical Information: Supplied by Resource Analysts, Inc. METALS METHOD RESULTS ANALYST ARSENIC 7060 ( 0.05 SPVK BARIUM 7080 0:16 SPVK CADMIUM 7130 < 0.005 SPVK CHROMIUM 7190 < 0.01 LJC LEAD 7420 < 0.05 LJC MERCURY 7470 < 0.002 LJC SELENIUM 7740 < 0.05 SPVK SILVER 7760 G 0.008 SPVK All concentrations, where observable, confirmed by standard additions. PESTICIDES METHOD RESULTS ANALYST ENDRIN LINDANE METHOXYCHLOR TOXAPHENE 2,4-D 2,4,5-TP SILVEX Ali results are expressed in mg/L SUMMARY OF EP TOXICITY TEST A. Customer Information: NAME: Goldberg Zoino Associates TECH. CONTACT PHONE ADDRESS: 1361 Elm Street ADMIN. CONTACT Manchester , New Hamoc_hirP PHONE 03101 8. Sample Information: (Customer Supplied) SAMPLE DESIGNATION: O Liquid OSlurry Paste Solid �IVPowder 2OGranular O Homogenous g Non-Homogenous OTHER: AMOUNT SUPPLIED: 1�y _o GRAB - COMPOSITE DESCRIBE SAMPLING AND PRESERVATION TECHNIQUES DESCRIBE THE PROCESS GENERATING THE WASTE: TAKEN BY: DATE(S) : C. Laboratory Information: supplied by Resource Analysts, Inc. DATE RECEIVED �,,� o„ EXTRACTED SAMPLE PREPARATION: I i T SOLID RESIDUE ,r ro ,,; row (dry) SAMPLE SIZE 1n2 .2ng WT. SOLIDS ,ping SOLIDS PREPARATION: the sample was subsq nlad and Ay ad rhrniigh 2 mm sieve VOLUME OF PRE-EXTRACTION FILTRATE 0 ml VOLUME OF WATER ADDED TO SOLIDS 1640 ml TF I TIME pH ml 0.5N Acid pH 9:08 9.09 16 4.85 9: 13 5.05 5.05 9:46 5 .29 10 4.76 10:48 4.674-67 16i30 5.20 4 An -- 9:34 5.20 I TOTAL VOLUME ACID ADDED 34 ml VOLUME OF WATER ADDED TO FILTERED EXTRACT 375 ml D. Analytical Information: Supplied by Resource Analysts, Inc. METALS METHOD RESULTS ANALYST ARSENIC 7060 0.07 SPVK BARIUM 7080 0.44 SPVK CADMIUM 7130 < 0.005 SPVK CHROMIUM 7190 < 0.01 LJC LEAD 7420 < 0.05 LJC MERCURY 7470 c 0.002 LJC SELENIUM 7740 < 0.05 SPVK SILVER 7760 < 0.008 SPVK All concentrations, where observable, confirmed by standard additions. PESTICIDES METHOD RESULTS ANALYST ENDRIN LINDANE METHOXYCHLOR TOXAPHENE 2,4-D 2,4,5-TP SILVEX All results, are expressed in mg/L THS I .�o / _ GOLC)SERG•ZOIN06ASSOC IC L CONSULTYNTS N!EINC. T -Y 3 GEOTECHNICAL-GEOHYOAOLDG ' JAMES O.OKUN p - _ - Y1 -" - --'- TOXICOlOG15T Z � THE GEO BUILDING 7 �T S O T (�7/y 3M NEED HAM STREET 1 dZ m m ® 1 .._- __ ___ ..... - . -- ._7 eENTOVER FALLS.MA 0Y184 o< _. W; g d f FZ QG �n � m > �• 0a o v ¢ 114- lw 4o 40 ck v ca a -f- c6 V Oo � ,( O ( �J 4 /� cemi CIO W pW ✓1 t S �' �o j — r 00 (Jam, i �l T ` y cv, T 5 N a memo `i g D A V a rn Cal `---�T Page No.Gzx Z GOLDBERG•ZOINO&ASSOCIATES.INC. • r' - GEOTECHNICAL-GEONYOROLOGICAL CONSULTANTS I Project File 2 Location Date By gy 3 Subject Checked 4 Based on By Revised By 3 i i 9 10 12 13 14is _ ` - \` i 16 v i 11 19 19 vc�v.\'� c.DJ �\� un 2021 22 ! 23 25 CT 26 27 28 29 30 ({�-{ I I 31 w1 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 i 39 .. -- 40 41 42 43 .i._ 44 - 45 46 47 48 49 50 !j� i. I t. Vic. A�..� +ii�'�,.,.t ✓r:`�'I r,,,_��_� �i,%:3.i i� �a.,`��iy�i� June 15,1984 Mr. Hugh Mulligan, Chairman Marblehead Conservation Commission Abbott Hall Marblehead, MA. 01945 Dear Mr. Mulligan: Enclosed please find a copy of a letter sent to Mr. Ragone of Lynnfield regarding the storage of inappropriate fill material in a wetland area on - Swampscott Road in Salem. According to tests performed by Sea Plantations, the material contains 0. 7% petrochemical and, additionally, it was the opinion of Sea Plantations that the material contained coal ash. It is our understanding the fill material emanated from New England Power Company, so its content would indeed be suspect. A cease and desist order was issued to Mr. Ragone on June 5, 1984, and, in response to this, the material is to be removed by June 28, 1984 . 6hile investigating this violation, it was brought to the Commission' s at- tention that some of this same fill is being used on Legg's Hill Road in Varhinhead on Mir. Mackey' s property. We felt this was something the "Marblehead Commision would. wish to address further. If we can be of further assistance in this, or any other related matter , please feel free to call. Sincerely yours, Philip D. Moran Chairman (J dey cc Marblehead Water and Sewer Department Rizzo ASSOCIATES, INC . ENGINEERS , SUR VEYORS AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS 235 West Central Street,Natick,MA 01760 (508)651-3401 FAX(508)651-1189 January 31, 1991 Mr. Donald C. Dolben Receiver for Rocky Mountain Real Estate Trust I c/o William H. Dolben & Sons, Inc. 15 State Street Boston, MA 02109 Dear Mr. Dolben: A field inspection of the self storage facility at 38 Swampscott Road in Salem, Massachusetts was conducted on December 4, 1990. The purpose of the investigation was to determine if the facility has been constructed substantially in accordance with engineering plans prepared by Rizzo Associates. The plans approved by the Conservation Commission in their Order of Conditions are dated February 15, 1985. These plans were later modified (dated April 12, 1985) to eliminate the Manager's residence and the sewer pumping station, allowing for the current sewer connection by gravity. Also, the footprint of the first building was reduced. These modifications reduced the scale of the project and, if anything, reduced the potential environmental impacts originally reviewed by the Commission. The results of the investigation indicated that the facility was built in accordance with the April 12, 1985 plans and complied with the provisions of the Order of Conditions. This conclusion is based on visual observations and tape measurements at spot locations and can be summarized as follows: 1. Grading. The site was graded in accordance with the elevation indicated on the site plan. The site plan called for grades to be at their highest closest to Swampscott Road and to decrease as you go away from Swampscott Road toward the pond. No significant grading changes from the plans were observed. 2. Building Locations and Security. The four buildings have been located as proposed on the site plans. The building closest to Swampscott Road is used for a combination of storage and retail space. The back three buildings are used exclusively for self storage purposes. In addition, there is security around the facility. The security consists of a locked gate and a chain link fence. The only area that is accessible to the public is the front part of the building closet to Swampscott Road which is used for retail space. ,. Rizzo ASSOCIATES , INC . Mr. Donald C. Dolben January 31, 1991 Page 2 3. Drainage. The drainage plan calls for overland flow to catchbasins and then discharges to the brook and pond on the periphery of the site. The catchbasins and drains are located as described in the plans and drainage seems to be functioning adequately. The slopes around the perimeter of the site to the brook and pond are well stabilized and vegetated; no erosion problems were apparent. Further, the 60-inch culvert that serves as the outlet to the pond has been constructed as shown on the plans and appears to be operating adequately. 4. Wastewater. Although access was not gained to the interior of any of the buildings, the attendant at the self storage facility was interviewed. She indicated that only the front building had wastewater facilities and that they were tied in to the sewer in Swampscott Road; the back three buildings are not sewered as planned. The Salem Building Inspector, Mr. Robert Gates, was contacted and indicated that the sewer was connected as planned and that, to his knowledge, the facility is operating adequately. 5. Water Supply. There is a fire hydrant located at the entrance to the building and the water main is looped around the site as required in the site plans. In summary, based on the above inspection, the facility has been built according to the site plan. The facility has been well constructed and is well operated and the premises were extremely clean and well kept. If you have any questions, please contact me. Very truly yours, RICHAR A. MOO E i,1 Richard A. Moore, P.E1,', N0. 28704 D Vice President._ T �I l{ vLD/178901L1.RAhtxiffi RAI � u Resource Analysts, Incorporated Box 4778 Hampton, NH 03842 (603) 926-7777 TO: PO # Salem Mr. Jim Okun Goldberg Zoino Associates Date Received: 6-26-84 320 Needham Street Newton Upper Falls, MA Lab Number: 3502 Date Reported: 6-27-84 .IDENTIFICATION Soil Samples from Salem SAMPLE DESIGNATION PARAMETER method Sill 5112 5113 5114 5115 Oil and Grease (mg/kg) 503D 32 C�n"�1� 230 300 250 1100 s � The above results are expressed as weight as received. Method number 503D refers to Standard Methods, 15th Edition yp e0'-J)4n 4' a• Switalski/Deschambault/Clarke/Van Kouwenberg ANALYST DIRECTOR i TIME pH ml 0.5N Acid pH 16:30 7.71 6 4.63 8:10 6.70 . 20 4.58 14:25 4.90 16:25 . 4.97 TOTAL VOLUME ACID ADDED 26 mL VOLUME OF WATER ADDED TO FILTERED EXTRACT 375 mi. D. Analytical Information: Supplied by Resource Analysts, Inc. METALS METHOD RESULTS ANALYST ARSENIC 7060 BARIUM 7080 CADMIUM 7130 CHROMTITM 719nLOOS LJG, LEAD 7420 ---- --------- MERCURY 7470 SELENIUM 7740 SILVER 7760 All concentrations, where observable, confirmed by standard additions. A' PESTICIDES METHOD RESULTS ANALYST ENDRIN LINDANE METHOXYCHLOR TOXAPHENE 2,4-D 2,4,5-TP SILVEX All results are expressed in mg/L SUMMARY OF EP TOXICITY TEST A. Customer Information: NAME: Mr. Jim Okun TECH. CONTACT PHONE 969-00_5n ADDRESS: Goldberg Zoino Associates ADMIN. CONTACT 320 Needham Street PHONE Newton Upper Falls. MA B. Sample Information: (Customer Supplied) SAMPLE DESIGNATION: Job M4260 S#4 O Liquid - ❑Slurry 07Paste E_Solid O Powder O Granular Q Homogenous ® Non-Homogenous OTHER: AMOUNT SUPPLIED: GRAB - COMPOSITE DESCRIBE SAMPLING AND PRESERVATION TECHNIQUES DESCRIBE THE PROCESS GENERATING THE WASTE: TAKEN BY: DATE(S) : C. Laboratory Information: supplied by Resource Analysts , Inc. DATE RECEIVED 6-26-84 EXTRACTED 6-97-R6 SAMPLE PREPARATION: % SOLID RESIDUE not required (dry) SAMPLE SIZE 100.Og WT. SOLIDS 100.0¢ SOLIDS PREPARATION: Sample passed thronnh ^ 2mmi VOLUME OF PRE-EXTRACTION FILTRATE n mT VOLUME OF WATER ADDED TO SOLIDS 1600 mT , s•aim.. kF1f4&::SY,ro@fI;A+S!_C.+"f�3£s41cRfFeR+Eya'.�a�elw'sdFxf.x,,Rt'.!"f irxa+-:.weMn,r TIME pH ml 0.5N Acid pH 16:25 7 .92 7:14 7.23 4.47 10:3 4,92 TOTAL VOLUME ACID ADDED VOLUME OF WATER ADDED TO FILTERED EXTRACT D. Analytical Information: Supplied by Resource Analysts, Inc. METALS METHOD RESULTS ANALYST 'ARSENIC 7060 BARIUM 7080 CADMIUM 7130 CHROMIUM 7190 LEAD 7420 MERCURY 7470 SELENIUM 7740 SILVER 7760 All concentrations, where observable, confirmed by standard additions. ,i: PESTICIDES METHOD RESULTS ANALYST ENDRIN LINDANE METHOXYCHLOR TOXAPHENE 2,4-D 2,4,5-TP SILVEX All results are expressed in mg/L SUMMARY OF EP TOXICITY TEST A. Customer Information: NAME: Mr. Jim Okun TECH. CONTACT PHONE 969-0050 _ ADDRESS: Goldberg Zoino Associates ADMIN. CONTACT 320 Needham Street PHONE Newton Upper Falls, MA B. Sample Information: (Customer Supplied) SAMPLE DESIGNATION: Job M4260 S#9 O Liquid OSlurry Paste ®Solid O Powder O Granular O Homogenous ® Non-homogenous OTHER: AMOUNT SUPPLIED: GRAB - COMPOSITE DESCRIBE SAMPLING AND PRESERVATION TECHNIQUES DESCRIBE THE PROCESS GENERATING THE WASTE: TAKEN BY: DATE(S) : e C. Laboratory Information: supplied by Resource Analysts, Inc. DATE RECEIVED 6-26-84 EXTRACTED 6-26-84 SAMPLE PREPARATION: SOLID RESIDUE not required (dry) SAMPLE SIZE 100.OR WT. SOLIDS 100-Dg SOLIDS PREPARATION: Sample passed through a 2mm sieve. VOLUME OF PRE-EXTRACTION FILTRATE 0 mL VOLUME OF WATER ADDED TO SOLIDS 1600 mL T 2 TIME pH ml. 0.5N Acid pH 16:30 8.28 14 4.52 8:10 6.30 15 4.79 14:25 5.05 16:25 5.07 TOTAL VOLUME ACID ADDED . 29 mL VOLUME OF WATER ADDED TO FILTERED EXTRACT 370 mL D. Analytical Information: Supplied by Resource Analysts, Inc. METALS METHOD RESULTS ANALYST ARSENIC 7UUO— BARIUM 7080 CADMIUM 7130 f NR(1MT1rM - 7190 LEAD 7420 MERCURY 7470 SELENIUM 7740 SILVER 7760 All concentrations, where observable, confirmed by standard additions. PESTICIDES METHOD RESULTS ANALYST ENDRIN LINDANE METHOXYCHLOR TOXAPHENE 2,4-D 2,4,5-TP SILVEX All results are expressed in mg/L L.ab Number: 355)2 ..1. Sample Designation: S=,#1. M4260 Date: 6/28/84 BASE/NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT (Ug/g) (i_ig;g) B. N-NITROSODIMETHYLAMINE E51)L 'B. Bis (2-CHLOROMETHYL) ETHER BDL :B. 1 , 3-DICHLOROBENZENE BDL LB. 1 , 4-DICHLOROBENZENE PDL P. 1 , 2-DICHL.OROBEIVZENE BDL B. Bis (2-CHLOROISOFlkOPYI_) ETHER 1-3111- B. i1)LB. HEXACHLOROETHANE BDL _ 41j. N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE BDL )D. NITROBENZENE BDL. OB. ISOPHORONE BDL 1B. BIS (2-CHLRORETHOXY) METHANE DDL.. 2B. 1 , 2, 4-TRICHLOROBENZENE BDL . 8. NAPHTHALENE DDL. 4B. HEXACHLOROBUTAD IENE- D(:)L = SE<. HEXACHLOROCYCLOPEN'T'ADIENE BDL 61-1. 2-CHLOFONAPHTHALE_INE BDL B J . D I METHYLPHTHALAT E DDL Ell.f. ACENAPHTHYLENE B1)L' . 7 2, 6-DINITROTOLUENE BDL tOB. ACENAPHTHENE BDL_ t I B. 2, 4-D INITRO'TOLUENE BDL_ 12B. D I ETHYLPHTHALATE DDL 3B. FLUORENE BDL '.=LB. 4--CHLOR )PHENYL PHENYL ETHER BDL_ . ._. 5D N-IVI'TROSO DIPHENYLAMINE DDL r.,B. 1. , 2-DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE (AZOBENZENE) DDL '78. 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER BDL :EIB. HEXACHLOROBENZENE BDL 19Ii. PHENANTHRENE :UB. ANTHRACENE BDL_ _ 1B. DI-N-BUTYLFHTHALATf._ BDL , 21q. FLUORANTHENE 2 3B. BENZIDINE DDL 4B. PYRENE 1 . 2 5,B. BUTYLBENZYLPHT'I-IALA'TE BDL 68. BENZO (a) ANTHRACENE 1. . 1 :7B. 3, 3' -DICHLOROBENZIDENE BDL EIB. CHRYSENE DDL_ -B. Bis (2-ElHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE 4 0B. DI-N-OCTYLPHT'HALATE BDL_ 1.B. BENZO (b) FLUOROANT'HENE DDL `2B. BENZO (k:) FLUOROANTHENE 3B. BENZO (a).PYREdE BDL 4B. IDENO ' ( 1 , x', 3-r_, cl) PYRENE DDL . 75 JB. DIBENZO (a, h) ANTHRACENE_ BDL 75 ,)B. BENZO (g, r,, i ) I=EFwt_EraE I:mt_ 75 EDI_ = BELOW DETECTION LIMIT' METHOD REFERENCE: EPA 600/4--79-020 h1E.111:1D 625 ^ ` . ` � LabNgmber: 3002-2 Stmple Designation: S#2 M4260 Date: 6/28/84 BASE/NEUTRAL FXTRH7TABLF ORGANICS CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT (ug/g) (ug/g) 1R. N-N7TROSODIMETHYLAMINE BDL " 3 2G. Bis (24CHLOROMETHYL) ETHER BDL . 3 :�!9" 1 , 3-DICHLOROBENZENE BDL 3 4G, 1 , 4-DICHLOROBENZENE BDL 3 5B" 1 , 2-DICHLOROBENZENE BDL 6B. Bis (2-CHLOROISOPROPYL) ETHER BDL 3 7p HEXACHLOROETHANE RDL " . 3 08^ N-NITROSODI-N`PROPYLAMINE BDL . 3 9B. NITROBENZENE BDL " 3 10B. ISOPHORONE BDL . 3 11B. DIS (2-CHLRORETHOXY) METHANE BDL . 7 12P. 1 , 2o4-TRICHLOROBENZENE BDL 3 1""B. NAPHTHALENE BDL . T 14B. HEXACHLORO9UTADIENE BDL . 3 15B" HEXACHLOROCYCLOPFNTADIFNE RDL " 3 16B. 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE BDL . 3 17B. DIMETHYLPHTHALATE BDL . 3 18B. ACENAPHTHYLENE BDL " 3 199. 2, 6-DINITROTPLUENF BDL . 3 20B ACENAPHTHENE^ .� BDL . 3 21B. 2, 4^DINITROTOLUENE BDL . 3 22B. DIETHYLPHTHALATE BDL . 3 23B^ FLUORENE BDL ^ � 24B, 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER BDL � 258. N--NITROSO DIPHENYLAMINE BDL . 3 26B. 1 , 2-DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE (AZOBENZENE) BDL ^ 3 278^ 4--BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER BDL ^ 3 28B" HEXACHL ROBENJENE BDL " 3 291.4. PHENANTHRENE 2. 6 . 3 30B, ANTHRACENE BDL 318^ DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE BDL . 3 32B" FLUORANTHENE 2. 4 " 3 338, BENZIDINE 8DL . 3 34B^ PYRENE 1 " 2 3 35B^ BUTYLBENZYLPHTHALATE BDL . 3 36B" BENZO (a) ANTHRACENE 1 " 5 � 37B, 3, 3' -DICHLORO8ENZIDENE PDL . 3 38F(. CHRYSENE RDL ^ � 39B^ Bis (2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE 7" 5 . � 40B^ DI7N-OCTYLPHTHALATE BDL ^ 3 41B" BENZO (b) FLUOROANTHENE BDL . 3 42B" BENZO <k> FLUOROANTHENE 1 . 3 43B. BPNZO(adPYRENE BDL . 3, 44B° lDENO ( 1 , 293-c, d) PYRENE BDL , 75 45B DIBENZO (a h) ANTHRACENE BDL " 75 169. BENZO (g, h, i ) PERYLENE BDL . 75 LIMITBDL = BELOW DETECTION METHOD REFERENCE: EPA 9~020 METHOD 625 [ � Iab ,Number: 3502-T S.Trnple Designation: S#3 114260 Date: 6/28/84 BASE/NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT (ug/g) (ug/g> �G. N-NITROSODIMETHYLAMINE BDL . 3 �B. Bis (2-CHLOROMETHYL) ETHER BDL 3 1R" 1 , 3-DICHLOROBENZENE BDL 3 !I Ft. 1 , 4-DICHLOROBENZENE BDL ^ 3 . JB. 1 , 2-DICHLOROBENZENE BDL ^ 3 �9. Bis (2-CHLOROlSOPROPYL) ETHER BDL . � /B" HEXACHLOROETHANE BDL . � 3p. N~NITROSODI-N^PROPYLAMINE PDL . 3 ?B NITROBENZENF " BDL ^ 3 1.OB. ISOPHORONE 8DL . � 1. 1B" BIS (2-CHLRORE7HOXY) METHANE BDL . 3 i2B. 1 , 2, 4-TRICHLOROBENZENE BDL . 3 NAPHTHALENE BDL i4B" HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE BDL . 3 i5B. FIE XACHLnRDCYCLOPENTADIENE BDL 3 i6n" 2~CHLORONAPHTHALENE BDL . 3 i7B. DIMETHYLPHTHALATE BDL ^ 3 1,8B. ACENAPHTHYLENE 1.9B, 2, 6-DINITROTOLUFNE PDL . � Z0B. ACENAPHTHENE BDL " 3 �1B. 2, 4^DINITROTOLUENE BDL . 3 �213" DIETHYLPHTHALATE BDL , 3 FLUORENF BDL . 3 .24B. 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER BDL . 3 I5B" N-NITROSO DIPHENYLAMINE BDL . 3 �6R^ 1 , 2`DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE (AZOBENZENE) BDL . � �'7B^ 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER 8DL " 3 ZBB^ HEXACHLOROBENZENE BDL � �9B PHENANTHRENE " 'OF . ANTHRACENE BDL 3 1.B. DI~N~BUTYLPHTHALATE BDL ^ 3 �,2B^ FLUORANTHENE 1 � BENZIDINE BDL ^ 3 Zi 13. PYRENE " 7 . � .,-)B. BUTYLBENZYLPHTHALATE 8DL 169° BENZO (a) ANTHRACENE . 8 . 3 ,"7 B. 3 3' DICHLOROBENZIDENE , - BDL T � 8B. CHRYSENE BDL . 3 Bis (2~ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE BDL . 3 1C)B" DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE BDL , 3 �1B" BENZO (b) FLUOROANTHENE BDL " 3 f2B" BENZO (k) FLUOROANTHENE BDL " 3 �39BENZO (a> PYRENE " BDL . 3 ' 14B^ IbENO ( 1 , 2, 3-c, d) PYRENE BDL " 75 159^ DIBENZO (a, h) ANTHRACENE BDL " 75 }6B, BENZO (g, h� i ) PERYLENE BDL ^ 75 � DDL = BELOW DETECTION LIMIT � METHOD REFERENCE: EPA 600/4-79`020 METHCn 625 {i.111 i V rr' DIY! I' ° 1y � I�' n ' ' I�R If M III Iln�y ! �r �! I� w isp p. � �. ! _�� SI71E Iq II ✓!4� } Ii IdResource Analysts, Incorporated I Box 4778 Hampron, NH 03841 (603) 9267777 1 „ I t w na' i , �� 'At I I i +I I ,' • 1 PO k Salem Mr. Jim Okun i�, ,� ! Date Received: 6/20/84 Goldberg Zoino' Associates 320,' e' edh6 Street {{i ' Newto' n' 'Up'perI rF I is MA IIj, 9 Lab Number: 3478 I .' Date Reported: 6/27/84 q IDENTIFICATION' t is ; i "Soil ,C posill te Samples from Salem Power Plant r ` SAMPLE DESIGNATION , PARAMETERiI� � I4� method, Composite 111 Composite 112 Composite 113 Oil and Grease„(mg/kg) 503D 102 120 70 tltltl b I I � 0The, bout results represent weight as received. TheNshove method number refers to Standard Methods, 15th Edition o I qq 1 II ! I 1 4, �. 11�!!! I IFI I'•'.I 'D 1 d i III 1 t� Deschambault, Van Kouwenberg Moore co ANALYST t DIRECTOR I�Uf9VIM1",LL,YYri%IY]pMI,eMWEIIiAbN�lYv41M!RONfwaav s.Hne.x..,,urvw,_u uw,.uu. ... .._�•ass.u•...es..— – _ .... _.._.... -...__.._ 9 ' TIME pH ml 0.5N Acid pH 11:05 3.95 16:00 4.00 8:00 4.10 10:42 4.05 TOTAL VOLUME ACID ADDED 0 mL VOLUME OF WATER ADDED TO FILTERED EXTRACT 400 mL D. Analytical Information: Supplied by Resource Analysts, Inc. METALS METHOD RESULTS ANALYST ARSENIC 7060 <0.006 SPVK BARIUM 7080 <0.1 SPVK CADMIUM 7130 0.008 SPVK CHROMIUM 7190 <0.02 SPVK LEAD 7420 <0.05 SPVK MERCURY 7470 <0.0006 SPVK SELENIUM 7740 <0.01 SPVK SILVER 7760 <0.008 SPVK All concentrations, where observable, confirmed by standard additions. PESTICIDES METHOD RESULTS ANALYST ENDRIN LINDANE METHOXYCHLOR TOXAPHENE 2,4—D 2,4,5-TP SILVEX All results are expressed in mg/L SUMMARY OF EP TOXICITY TEST A. Customer Information: NAME: Goldberg Zoino Associates TECH. CONTACT PHONE ADDRESS: 320 Needham Street ADMIN. CONTACT Newton Upper Falls, MA PHONE B. Sample Information: (Customer Supplied) SAMPLE DESIGNATION: Salem Power Plant Composite E1 O Liquid • ❑Slurry Paste ®Solid O Powder O Granular D Homogenous ® Non-Homogenous OTHER: AMOUNT SUPPLIED: GRAB - COMPOSITE DESCRIBE SAMPLING AND PRESERVATION TECHNIQUES IgDESCRIBE THE PROCESS GENERATING THE WASTE: TAKEN BY: DATE(S) : C: 'Laboratory Information: supplied by Resource Analysts, Inc. DATE RECEIVED 6-20-84 EXTRACTED 6-21-84 SAMPLE PREPARATION: Y. SOLID RESIDUE not required (dry) SAMPLE SIZE 100.38 WT. SOLIDS 100.3g SOLIDS PREPARATION: VOLUME OF PRE-EXTRACTION FILTRATE o mL VOLUME OF WATER ADDED TO SOLIDS 1605 mL TIME pH ml 0.5N Acid pH s , 11:05 5.95 17 3 •.16:00 3.85 8:00 4.20 10:42 4.20 li TOTAL VOLUME ACID ADDED 17 mL VOLUME OF WATER ADDED TO FILTERED EXTRACT 395 m D. Analytical Information: Supplied by Resource Analysts, Inc. METALS METHOD RESULTS ANALYST ARSENIC 7060 <0.006 SPVK BARIUM 7080 <0'.1 SPVK CADMIUM 7130 <0.005 SPVK CHROMIUM 7190 <0.02 SPVK LEAD 7420 <0.05 SPVK MERCURY 7470 <0.0006 SPVK SELENIUM 7740 <0.01 SPVK , SILVER 7760 <0.008 SPVK All concentrations, where observable, confirmed by standard additions. PESTICIDES METHOD RESULTS ANALYST ENDRIN LINDANE METHOXYCHLOR TOXAPHENE 2,4-D 2,4,5-TP SILVEX All results are expressed in mg/L SUMMARY OF EP TOXICITY TEST A. Customer Information: NAME: Goldberg Z61no Associates TECH. CONTACT PHONE ADDRESS: 320 Needham Street ADMIN. CONTACT Newton Upper Falls MA PHONE ' B. Sample Information: (Customer Supplied) SAMPLE DESIGNATION: Salem Power Plant Composite #2 ❑Liquid ❑Slurry Paste ®Solid 0 Powder ❑Granular D Homogenous ® Non-Homogenous OTHER: AMOUNT SUPPLIED: GRAB - COMPOSITE DESCRIBE SAMPLING AND PRESERVATION TECHNIQUES DESCRIBE THE PROCESS GENERATING THE WASTE: TAKEN BY: DATE(S) : C. Laboratory Information: supplied by Resource Analysts, Inc. DATE RECEIVED 6-20-84 EXTRACTED 6-97-A4 SAMPLE PREPARATION: SOLID RESIDUE not re,4u�rL- -ed (dry) SAMPLE SIZE 102.Qg WT. SOLIDS inZ_ag SOLIDS PREPARATION: VOLUME OF PRE—EXTRACTION FILTRATE 0 mL VOLUME OF WATER ADDED TO SOLIDS 1630 mL SUMMARY OF EP TOXICITY TEST A. Customer Information: NAME: Goldberg Zoino Associates TECH. CONTACT PHONE ADDRESS: 320 Needham Street ADMIN. CONTACT Newton Upper Falls, MA PHONE B. Sample Information: (Customer Supplied) SAMPLE DESIGNATION: Salem Power Plant Composite #3 O Liquid CjSlurry Paste ElSolid O Powder OGranular O Homogenous ® Non-Homogenous OTHER: AMOUNT SUPPLIED: GRAB - COMPOSITE DESCRIBE SAMPLING AND PRESERVATION TECHNIQUES DESCRIBE THE PROCESS GENERATING THE WASTE: TAKEN BY: DATE(S) : C. Laboratory Information: supplied by Resource Analysts, Inc. DATE RECEIVED 6-20-84 EXTRACTED 6-21-84 SAMPLE PREPARATION: SOLID RESIDUE not required (dry) SAMPLE "SIZE 101.Og WT. SOLIDS 101.Og SOLIDS PREPARATION: VOLUME OF PRE-EXTRACTION FILTRATE OMT VOLUME OF WATER ADDED TO SOLIDS 1615 mi r i TIME pH ml 0.5N Acid pH 11:0510 mL I AD l6oOO 4-9'0 8,00 4-RQ in-49 4-80 o-; t TOTAL VOLUME ACID ADDED 10 mL VOLUME OF WATER ADDED TO FILTERED EXTRACT 395 mL D. Analytical Information: Supplied by Resource Analysts, Inc. u METALS METHOD RESULTS ANALYST ARSENIC 7060 <0.006 SPVK BARIUM 7080 <0.1 SPVK CADMIUM 7130 <0.005 SPVK CHROMIUM 7140 <0,02 SPVK LEAD 7420 <0.05 SPVK MERCURY 7470 <0.0006 SPVK SELENIUM 7740 <0.01 SPVK SILVER 7760 <0.008 SPVK All concentrations, where observable, confirmed by standard additions. PESTICIDES METHOD RESULTS ANALYST ENDRIN LINDANE METHOXYCHLOR TOXAPHENE 2,4-D 2,4,5-TP SILVEX All results are expressed in mg/L L s ) Lab Number: 3478-3 Sample Designation: Salem Power Plant Composite #k Date: 6/26/84 BASE/NEUTRALEXTRACTABLE ORGANICS CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT (ug/g) (ug/g) 3. N-NITROSODIMETHYLAMINE PDL . 2 Y. Bis (2-CHLOROMETHYL) ETHER DDL . _ 5+. 1 , 3-DICHLOROBENZENE BDL . 2 g. 1 , 4-DICHLOROBENZENE BDL . 2 +. 1 , 2-DICHLOROBENZENE BDL . 2 P. Bis (2-CHLOROISOPROPYL) ETHER BDL . 2 +. HEXACHLOROETFIANE BDL . 3. N--NITROS'ODI-N-PROPYLAMINE PUL . 2 3. NITROBENZENE BDL . 2 )B. ISOPHORONE DDL- . Q. PIS (2-CHLRORETHOXY) METHANE BDL . 2 2B. 1 , 2, 4-TRICHLOROPENZENE BDL . _ SB. NAPHTHALENE PDL . 0. HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE BDL_ . 2 5B. HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE BDL _4-'+. 2--CHLORONAPHTHALENE BDL . 2 /B. DIMETHYL-PHTHALATE PDL- . '9B. ACENAPHTHYLENE DDL . 2 ?B. 2, 6-DINITROTOLUENE DDL . )B. ACENAPHTHENE BDL . 2 1Ft. 2, 4-DINITROTOLUENE BDL . 2B. DIETHYLPHTHALATE BDL- . - _,B. FLUORENE BDL . _ -kB. 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER BDL . - 5D. N-NITROSO DIP'HENYLAMINE BDL- . 6B. 1 , 2-DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE (AZOSENZENE) EDL . 2 7B. 4-BRbMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER PUL . E.B. HEXACHLUROPENZENE BbL . 2 99.' PHENANTHRENE 2. 5 . 2 OB. ANTHRACENE BDL . 2 iB. DI--N-BUTYLPHTHALATE BDL- . 2 :`.B. FLUORANTHENE 1 . . 2 3B. BENZIDINE BDL . 2 4B. PYRENE . 5 . 2 5B. BUTYLBENZYLPHTHALATE PDL 68. ,. BENZO (a) ANTHRACENE . .3 . 2 7B. ' -DICHLOROBF_NZIDENE BDL . 2 8B. CHRYSENE BDL . 2 9B. Bis (2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE 9. 2 . _ VB. DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE PDL . 2 1B. BENZO (b) FLUOROANTHENE BDL . _ 2B. BENZO (k) FLUOROANTHENE DDL . 2 3B. BENZO (a) PYRENE BDL . 2 4B. IDENO ( 1 , 2, 3-c, d) PYRENE BDL . 5 5B. DIBENZO (a, h) ANTHRACENE DDL . 5 601 BENZO (g, h, i ) PERYLENE PDL . 5 PDL = BELOW DETECTION LIMI'l METHOD REFERENCE: EPA 600/4--79-020 METHOD 625 Resource Analysts, Incorporated i/ Lab NUmber: :478 Sampli= Designation: Salem Power Plant. Composite #2 Da.te: 6/26/134 BASE/NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS CONCENTRATION DE'T'EC:TION LIMIT (Ug/g) (ug/g) N-NITROSODIMETHYLAMINE DDL. . _ Bis (2-CHLOROMETHYL) ETHER PDL . 2 1 , 3-DICHLOROBENZENE - BDL 1 , 4-DICHLOROBENZENE BDL_ . 1 , 2-DICHLOROBENZENE BDL . _ Bis (2-CHLOROISOPROPYL) EITHER BDL HEXACHLOROETHANE DDL . 2 N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE BDL . 2 NITROBENZENE BDL . 2 I SOPHORONE PDL . ' }{. BTS (2-CHLRORETHOXY) METHANE BDL . 2 D. 1 , 2, 4-TRICHLOROBENZENE BDL 2 ?;, NAPHTHALENE DDL . 2 Li. I-iEXACHL-OROBUTADIENE DDL ;L::+. HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE DDL . :2 .,. 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE BDL 'P. DIMETHYLPHTHALATE DDL . 2 ID. ACENAPHTHYLENE PDL . 2 D. 2, 6-DINITROTOLUENE BDL . 2 )D. ACENAPHTHENE BDL P. 2, 4-DINITROTOLUENE DDL 'D. DIETHYLPHTHALATE PDL . _ :I3. F'LUORENE PDL. . -1 4-CHLORCIPHENYL PHENYL ETHER DDL - ;B. N-NITROSO DIPHENYLAMINE BDL 'D. 1 , 2-DIF'HENYLHYDRAZINE (AZODENZENE) DDL 'D. 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER BDL . IP. HEXACHLOROBENZENE BDL F3. PHENANTHRENE 1 . 65 P. ANTHRACENE . BDL . 2 D. DI-N-BUTYLP'HTHALATE BDL . '.D. FLUORANTHENE . 5 . 2 >D. DENZIDINE BDL 2 4D. PYRENE . 2 . 2 5B. BLITYLBENZYLPHTHALATE BDL . 2 D. DENZO (a) ANTHRACENE . 3 . 2 B. 1, 3'-DICHLOROBENZIDENE DDL . 2 IP. CHRYSENE BDL. )D. Bis (2-ETHYLHEXYL) P'H'THALATE 44 D. DI•-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE DDL .D. DENZO (b) FLUOROANTHENE DDL . '-li. BENZO (k) FLUOROANTHENE BDL . "I.A. BENZO (a) PYRENE BDL . 1D. IDENO ( 1 , 2, 3-c, d) PYRENE PDL_ . 5 iD. DIBENZO (a, h) ANTHRACENE BDL . 5 ,D. BENZO (g, h, i ) PERYLENE DDL . 5 BDL = BELOW DETECTION LIMIT METHOD REFERENCE: EPA 600/4--79-020 METHOD 625 Resource Analysts, Incorporated Lab Number: 3478-•1 Sample Designation: Salem Power Plant Composite #1 Date: 6/26/84 BASE/NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT (ug/g) (ug/g) N-NITROSODIMETHYLAMINE BDL . 2 Bis (2-CFILOROMETHYL) ETHER DDL . 2 193-DICHLOROBENZENE - DDL. . 2 1 , 4-DICHLOROBENZENE.. BDL . 2 1 , 2-DICHLOROBENZENE HDL . 2 Bis (2-CHLOROISOPROPYL) ETHER DDL_ HEXACHLOROETHANE BDL . 2 d. N--NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE BDL . 2 NITROBENZENE DDL . _ )B. ISOPHORONE HDL . 2 [D. BIS (2-CHLRORETHOXY) METHANE DDL . 2 'D. 1 , 2, 4-TRICHLOROBENZENE DDL . 2 D. NAPHTHALENE BDL . EH. HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE BDL . - �B. HEXACHLOROCYCLOP'ENTADIENE HDL . 2 Q. -CHLORONAPHTHAL.ENE DDL- . 7P. DIMETHYLPHTHALATE PDL- ]D. ACENAPHTHYLENE HDL . 2 >D. 2, 6-DINITROTOLUENE DDL . 2 DD. ACENAPHTHENE BDL LB.' 2, 4-DINITROTOL.UF_NE BDL 'P. DIETHYLPHTHALATE BDL . FLUORENE PDL . _ 4D. 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER BDL . 2 SD. N-NITROSO DIP'HENYLAMINE HDL. i,D. 1 , 2-DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE (AZODENZENE) BDL . 2 7D. 4-BROMOPHENYL. PHENYL ETHER BDL 3B. HEXACHLOIOBENZENE BDL W. PHENANTHRENE 2. 4 D. ANTHRACENE BDL . _ LB. DI-N-BUT'YLPHTHALATE PDL FLUORANTHENE I . J. 1B. BENZIDINE BDL . 2 4D. PYRENE . 7 . _ B. BUTYLBENZYLPHTHALATE BDL SD. >, BENZO (a)ANTHRACENE 1 . 6 . 2 7B. 3, .3'-DICHLOROBENZIDENE PDL =3B. CHRYSENE BDL 76. Bis (2-ETHYLHEXYL.) PHTHALATE 13 . 2 it). DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE BDL- . - 1B. BENZO (b) FLUOROANTHENE DDL . 2 P. BENZO (l::) FLUOROANTHENE BDL- . Q. BENZO (a) PYRENE BDL . 2 . AD. IDENO ( 1 , 2, 3-c, d) PYRENE HDI_ . 5 _`B. DIBENZO (a, h) ANTHRACENE BDL . 5 SP:. , BEN7.O (g, h, i. ) P'ERYLF_NL BDL . 5 PDL = BELOW DETECTION LIMIT' METHOD REFERENCE: EPA 600/4-79-020 METHOD 625 Resource Analysts, Incorporated s. � • s N: • 1111�1111111111� SEWAGE PUMP T: gilllllil lllNl��ll"lllllli : • RPM " . IINIIINIIIIIII��IIINNI��ppIS41-23 IMPELLER • _r. IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIlN1NIIIIII log - IIIII111lIIIIINIlIIIIIIIIEl�lnnlmm! nolo mnminnnE� �°° r+� ! . , '��� � ®® ���:,,:fllNlllllllll111lllllllNIIINNIIINIIIIIIIIIIIIlNII1NINII� m9 �� !�� '�� ';�!!11�4�11IIIIIIIIIINII111118i181111N1llINIIIIIII ���� ��� ���'m ��llhei!!o!!EI�II�IIIIIIIIIIIINltlllllll111111111N� IIIIINIII � � • �• �® ��� '��' so.'!EiNNH �"!�IIIlI!!';illIIIIII NIIIIIINlIIIIIlIIIi m ',, ' = ����� ► h:h''.+.!Il� Will! 1111111NIIIII1111llllll c �� ��nlllill� �!!vlq�;El�!!!� ���� IIIIIIIIIIINtfI1111ilIIIN 1 � »f t��1 �.� ��!Ilpn!�E�Illhit�p���ln�t,E.EIS!ilEi�:!I!IlNN!!ININIIIIIIIII�I m`' �s' ""!?Eli!!�INlnt''�lllihE�;!�Ih�iii�!!Ili�iil�"!IIilINII INIININ vImii;'.II!.IltllihlIT .�nit.t�.. IIIIEltr.11Ei.�e. I�JiIIIINI Y11111llll,i4k, �!IltillE�z'EE�f�9�r ;+IINElt!!�:•ai!•!�IIII n ` eghee ( •a!{ �Etle. •4!H ''�" .w • p ., aa , �� `�!�_ N�li lEl1,:.;�llt�iaitElt,.. It :•aetn►. ,.lh°:,:�lllltu�.lulitll ' e�tt�•S�n•. •ettlll!ltp�. ,�� '��. . .a... E�,IIIIIIEElt=:. %,m!!I!tl,,. . •�t�t;..Hb., aE�liNii911 . ... ; u•- � IIEl;=�t•. �liilllllE�t.'..l.!';e!!1lIN�!!!!'u'Afli�'!�I�NNtlilli� •. • '�h iu!lltitlllf►11e!tllpl!m„!!IIIIIII�iNNINNi�IIIIININ I �16�'t:Nlii�i�!'�!!'�iiii�i!�flll�lllii!'!iIINHNINNIIN�iii!!lIIIII � , - ',, ® �N III�iII�IINI 6 :�III�N � �i� DOLBEN February 27, 1991 Essex County Southern Registry District of the Land Court 32 Federal Street Salem, MA 01970 Gentlemen: Enclosed please find our check in the amount of $40 to record the enclosed Certificate of Compliance. It should be noted on Certificate of Title No. 54779 against two instruments, namely the Order of Conditions dated March 12 , 1981 filed as Document 187873 on May 17, 1983 and the Order of Conditions dated March 19, 1985 filed as Document 201209 on April 11, 1985. Please note the recording information on the enclosed photocopy and return same to me in the enclosed postpaid return envelope. Ve y truly ours, Doi".Do . D ben Receiver for Rocky Mountain Real Estate Trust I DCD/eeb Enclosures 75 State Street Telephone Fax Boston,Massachusetts 02109 617 737-1400 617 737-1851 L I CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS PLANNING DEPARTMENT �ti .covay��, f ONE SALEM GREEN 01970 (508)745-9595,E%T.311 d>IpT.� April 19, 1989 - Mr. David Ebershoff Ebershoff & Company 720 S. Colorado Boulevard Suite 950 Denver, CO 80222 Dear Dave: I would like to take this opportunity to tell you it was pleasure meeting with you last week to discuss your Swampscott Road development. Since our meeting, I have been researching your two (2) main concerns: 1. The removal and replacement of the existing guardrail in front of your property. Z. The removal of the utility pole located in your driveway. I am in the process of preparing cost estimates for the removal and replacement of the guardrail. Following the completion of estimates, I will request an appropriation of funds from the City Council to complete the work. Also, I have contacted Massachusetts Electric, and they are preparing a cost estimate to move the utility pole. I will keep you abreast of the progress in this issue. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (508) 745- 9595 ext. 311. Sincerely, William aster Acting City Planner M48 WP CAminjission Cbnserva (an r`. Salam. Massachnsctts 01.470 .1 r.j SS nCt October 12, 1984 Mr. Richard J. Ragone RE: DEQE #64-73 437 Main Street Lynnfield, MA. 01940 Dear Rick: At last evening's meeting of the Conservation Commission, the matter of the illegal fill on your property on Swampscott Road was discussed. It was agreed that the Cease and Desist order will be lifted contingent upon the following conditions: 1. All contaminated fill shall be removed immediately under the supervision of the Conservation Aide. 2. Gates to the site shall remain locked at all times except when a represen- tative of the owner is on site. 3. A representative of the owner shall supervise the fill operation and shall stockpile all fill within 100 feet of the site entrance. 4. When the site representative of the owner expects to fill and grade the site, he/she shall notify the Conservation Aide. If you have any questions regarding the above, please feel free to call. Sincerely yours, Charles Frederiksen Conservation Aide dey cc DEQE s' (IT aner£� #r -in �ammtian 21 April 1976 Mr. Joseph Ragone 437 Main Street Lynnfield, Massachusetts 01940 Dear Mr. Ragone: As you are aware, the Commission voted at the wetlands hearing on April 12th, 1976 to continue the hearing at a later date because the additional information requested from you in our letter dated March 31, 1976 had not been supplied. Please include a topographic plan of the site at a scale of 1 inch equals 100 feet, with contour intervals of preferably 2 feet, all wetlands and streams accurately delineated. It is also essen- tial that your property boundaries are shown accurately on this plan. Since it is your intention to install metal culverts in an area affected by ash deposits, please include the pH tests of the water and of the stream bed material which we discussed at the hearing. Yours sincerely, Brian E. French Chairman BEF/pt cc: Dept. of Environmental Quality Engineering DEQE File No. 64-11 D o a s O a Engineers and Environmental Scientists 235 West Central Street, Natick, Massachusetts 01760 (617) 651-3401 December 29 , 1986 r.y��^•i' ski rq 1.,. Ms . Dale Yale n� 2 1986 Salem Conservation Commission l One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 SALENi PLnN1ING DEs'I, Dear Ms . Yale: This letter is in response to Additional Condition No . 5 in the Modification of Original Order of Conditions No . 64-73 . This Order of Conditions applies to the work on 38 Swampscott Road being conducted by David L. Ebershoff . Additional Conditional No . 5 requires that the Conservation Commission be notified prior to building construction that the site is free of hazardous waste. The original fill material on the site has been removed and clean fill has been placed to bring the site to grade. It is our opinion that the site is free of hazardous waste and that building construction should proceed. If you have any questions on this matter please call . Ve truly yours , LG� aw Richard A. Moore, P.E. Vice President RAM/dmf/191E Enclosure ENGINEERING • TECHNOLOGY 29 CONGRESS ST=.EET SALEM KA 01970 (617)745-4560 DAcc: Salem Conservation Committee 6/12/84 PRDJ. NO.: LABORATORY REPORT Soil Sample 406017 DEQE Limit Petroleum Hydrocarbons % 0.71-A 3.0 The oil. & .greasefractionof the soiT sample obtained from the transfer station was extracted by the soxhlet --_ - method (Standard Methods 503C 15th Edition) . The non- Petroleum Hydrocarbon fraction was separated from the - Petroleum Hydrocarbon fraction by silica gel . The— analysis he_anal sis .was performed by G.C. Petroleum Hydrocarbons were quantified versus iso-octane. Sampled by: BB Sampled on: 6/8 Sampled R'cd• 6/8 Date Laboratory Director HILURE nrA7L _ GET 1 METH �tislTlITIES ,el 4 MHL l GET . 1 METH iLE 21 FUti 1 HSITI!IITIES 159 5 �• JJ � (i ti• ' 4 VVV u .. B� 13. b 10. 58 11 . 24 I 14. 41 F.N w �•�a"j'i, - r� .Jr/iorlincnl�:�(��lr.ti•oanaciel(t��«¢l� C,//��,ci��crii�9 \� �'�)�, � � .//'//'lr�O�li/n .%�CJ102 - �I'pN�I/('//.J� ✓fir'/L/on ANTHONY D.CORTESE, Sc.D. Com mis cion c. 717-5194 935-2160 July 25, 1984 RECE 'r'L — Mr. Robert Blenkhorn - JUL 2 71984 Salem Board of Health 9 North St. SALEM PLANNING DEPT. Salem, MA 01970 Dear Mr. Blankhorn: On July 19, 1984, personnel from the Metropolitan Boston/Northeast Regional Office of the Department of Environmental Quality Engineering visited the New England Power Company (NEPCO) in Salem to inspect the area at the plant from which :Fill had recently been removed. Attending the site visit and supplying site information were the following: " Mr. Joe Kwasnick, NEPCO, Mr. John Webster of Fluor Constructors, Inc. , NEPCO's construction contractor; Mr. Jim Okum of Goldberg-Zaino and Associates (GZA) , geological consultant; in addi- tion to Mr. Steve Johnson of the Department of Environmental Quality Engineering. The excavated area was constructed as a runoff collection pond. Four to six feet of apparantly native soil had been removed along with some residual coal particles. According to Mr. Webster, the area had been used for coal storage and, before excavation began, the coal was moved to another place on-site. Thus, only the coal particles that were not scraped up and moved would be found in the fill material. Inspection of the banks of the pond area showed a glacial till that did not appear contaminated or mixed with any fly ash or other solid waste. The site that received the 8,000 yards of fill from NEPCO was then in- spected. The location of the "Mackey" site is on the west side of Legg Hill near the Salem/Marblehead town line, less than 1/4 mile from the source of a backup water supply for the Town of Marblehead. The fill from the power plant was pointed out and, again, the soil appeared to be over 95% native soil inter- mixed with small coal particles. No fly ash was observed at the time of the inspection, and Mr. Webster stated that no fly ash had been seen during the excavation. Analyses of the NEPCO fill provided by GZA indicate normal, back- ground levels of base/neutrals and heavy metals. Had fly ash been a significan.t constituent of the fill, the levels of these contaminants would have been elevated. There were, however, other materials at the Mackey site unrelated to the NEPCO frill which included ashphalt paving, roofing materials, four large, empty oil tanks and other refuse disposed in an indiscrimanate and unregulated manner. In addition, the slope of the filled area was dangerously steep, posing a safety problem should excessive erosion of the banks occur. Mr. Robert Blenkhorn July 25 , 1984 Page 2, Based upon these observations, the following comments and recommendations are made: 1) There does not appear to be an environmental or public health threat from the fill brought from NEPCO to the Mackey site. 2) NEPCO should be informed that anything other than clean fill, including fill mixed with solid wastes, should be transported to an approved sanitary landfill; and further disposal of fill material, which includes solid wastes, at the Mackey site is prohibited without a Salem Board of Health site assignment. 3) Certain dumpings at the Mackey site appear to be in violation of Massachusetts solid waste laws, specifically M.G.L. Chapter 111, Section 150A. No further disposal of solid waste material should take place of this site without a Salem Board of Health site assignment. 4) The safety threat presented by the unacceptable slope of the filled material at the Mackey site should be rectified immediately. 5) A site assignment by the Salem Board of Health for the Mackey site should consider the proximity of a water supply, and enforce re- strictions on disposal accordingly. If there are anyfurther questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me at the letterhead address, or 935-2160. vary truly yours, ��77 Ri Rchard i1pin Acting Regi al Environmental Engineer cc: Mr. . Charles Frederickson, Salem Conservation Commission, 1 Salem Green, Salem, MA 01970 New England Power Company, Fort Ave. , Salem, MA 01970 Fluor Construction Inc. , P.O. Box 3048, Salem, MA 01970 Thomas Mackey & Sons, Inc. , 58 Broadway, Salem, MA .01970 ni"CV, 'XON Co on Commission Salem. Massachusetts 01970y July 16,- 1984 Mr. Richard J. Ragone 437 Main Street Lynnfield, MA. 01940 Dear Mr. Ragone.., At last Thursday'-s meeting of the Conservation Commission, it was - - - voEed>to lift;the Cease and Desist order .issued to you on June .5, 1984. The Commission-is cognizant of your efforts to comply with the Wetlands 'Protection Act andappreciatesthose efforts. - - If there is any assistance the Commission can provide in the future regarding your project on Swampscott Road, please do not hesitate to contact Charles Frederiksen at 744-4580. Sincerely yours, Glenn A. Yale `J - vice-chairman dey y P � May 10, 1983 Susan Maddison City of Salem Planning Board 1 Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Dear Susans This letter is to inform the Salem Conservation Commission, and any other agency involved , that Joseph G. Ragone of 437 Main Street, Lynnfield, MA, requests renewal of the Order of Conditions for the project located on Swampscott Road , Salem, MA, recorded at the Registry of Deeds, Book 29, Page 7091. If you have any questions please contact Philip G. Christiansen, P.E. , of West Newbury at 465-0058 or Richard J. Ragone at 437-7658. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, �;� Richard J. Ragone 437 Main Street Lynnfield, MA 01940 Encs Order of Conditions ccs Philip G. Christiansen i PHILIP G. CHRISTIANSEN Professional Engineer 772 Main Street West Newbury,MA 01985 Telephone(617)465-0058 March 27, 1981 Ms. Susan Madison Convervation Aide Conservation Commission Salem, MA 01970 RE: Jospeh Ragone Swampscott Rd. Dear Ms. Madison: The elevation datum shown on sheet 1 of the plans filed with both the Conservation Commission and the Planning Board is incorrectly given as M. S.L. (Mean Sea Level) . The datum should be Salem datum or Mean Low Water. I will send you corrected prints of that sheet for your files . Very truly yours, Philip G. Christiansen PGC ;cl 1 %ON Co Salem. Massachusetts 01970 tJ '''^5S^tNy DEQE File P: 64-73 Date: 10/10/84 PROPOSED PROJECT SUMMARY Applicant: Rick Ragone Address: 437 Main Street, Lynnfield, MA Phone : 334-3494 Location of Property: Swampscott Road, Salem Project Description: Fillip f «ha 32nd I. Type of Action: Cease and Desist Enforcement Order Determination of Applicability _ Modification of Order Notice of intent Extension of Order Abbreviated Notice of Intent Certificate of Compliance II. Interest(s) in the Wetlands Protection Act, M.G.L. c. 131, s. 40 affected: Public or private water supply XXX Ground water supply XXX Storm damage prevention t XXX Prevention of pollution Protection of land containing shellfish Protection of fisheries III. Resource areas subject to protection: -XXX Bank Ocean XXX Fresh water wetland — Estuary _ Coastal wetland XXX Creek Beach XXX River bordering on: XXX Stream _ Dune Flat XXX Pond _ — XXX Marsh Lake Swamp XXX Land under any of the water bodies listed above Land subject to tidal action Land subject to coastal storm flowage XXX Land subject to flooding IV. Comments : On Thursday October 41 1984 DEQE's Hazardous Waste Unit called to inform the Commission that some contaminated fill had been deposited on the Ragone land. I met with a field engineer at the site and she showed me what fill she felt was contaminated. I met with Mr. Ragone on Sunday and showed him what had to be removed. He said it would be removed by the meeting. Evidently the fill was taken from a petroleum spill site in Lynn at the New Englnad Telephone building. The fill did not contain any of the spill, but was above the spill area and could have been contaminated. Ray signed a Cease and Desist Order on Thursday, October 4, 1984. V. Proposed conditions: 1. All contaminated fill shall be removed immediately under the supervision of the Conservation Aide. 2. Gates to the site shall remain locked at all times except when a representa- tive of the owner is on site. 3. A representative of the owner shall supervise the fill operation and shall stockpile all fill within 100 feet of the site entrance. 4.,When the, site representative of the owner expects to fill and grade the site heshe shall notify the Conservation Aide. Conservation Aide October 10, 1984 Date D Ccm J--ted application forms and pians as required by the Act and Regulations shall be filed with the on or before (date), C and no further work shall be performed until a public hearing has been held and an Order of Conditions has been issued to regulate said work. Application forms are available at: The property owner shall take.every reasonable step to prevent further violations of the act. �J Other (specify) THIS FILL SHALL BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY Failure to comply with this Order may constitute grounds for legal action. Massachusetts General Laws Chap. ter 131 , Section 40 provides: Whoever violates any provision of this section shall be punished by a fine of not more than one thousand dollars or by imprisonment for not more than six months or both. Each day or portion thereof of continuing violation shalt constitute a separate offense. Questions regarding this Enforcement Order should be directed to: 744-4580 Charles Frederiksen Issued by SALEM CONSERVATION COMMISSION Signature(s) ti PA (Signature of delivery person or certified mail number) 9-2 �%0%' Co 0 0 Salem. Massachusetts 01970 '��fASSPt�y DEQE File �f Date: PROPOSED PROJECT SUIL'SARY Applicant: Address: Phone : Location of Property: Project Description: I. Type of Action: Determination of Applicability Modification of Order Notice of Intent Extension of Order Abbreviated Notice of Intent Certificate of Compliance II. Interest(s) in the Wetlands Protection Act, M.G.L. c. 131, s. 40 affected: Public or private water supply Ground water supply Storm damage prevention Prevention of pollution Protection of land containing shellfish Protection of fisheries III. Resource areas subject to protection: _ Bank Ocean _ Fresh water wetland Estuary _ Coastal wetland Creek Beach River _ Dune bordering on: Stream _ Flat Pond Marsh _ Lake Swamp XXX Land under any of the water bodies listed above Land subject to tidal action Land subject to coastal storm flowage XXX Land subject to flooding IV. Comments: On Thursday October 4, 1984 DEQE's Hazardous Waste Unit called to inform the Commission that some contaminated fill had been deposited on the Ragone land. I met with a field engineer at the site and she showed me what fill she felt was contaminated. I met with Mr. Ragone on Sunday and showed him what had to be removed. He said it would be removed by the meeting. Evidently the fill was taken from a petroleum spill site in Lynn at the New Englnad Telephone building. The fill did not contain any of the spill, but was above the spill area and could have been contaminated. Ray signed a Cease and Desist Order on Thursday, October 4, 1984. V. Proposed conditions: 1.. All contaminated fill shall be removed immediately under the supervision of the Conservation'Aide. 2. Gates to the site shall remain locked at all times except when a representa- tive of the owner is on site. 3. A representative of the owner shall supervise the fill operation and shall stockpile all fill within 100 feet;of the site entrance. 4. ,When the, site representative of the owner expects to fill and grade the , site heshe shall notify the Conservation Aide. Conservation Aide October 10, 1984 Date %oN Cp',�' Salem. Massachusetts 01970 e7 ASS"cN� DEQE File ;i 64-73 Date: 10/10/84 PROPOSED PROJECT SUMMARY Applicant: Rick Ragone Address: 437 Main Street, Lynnfield, MA Phone : 334-3494 Location of Property: Swampscott Road, Salem Project Description: Filling yft J-2aa I. Type of Action: Cease and Desist Enforcement Order Determination of Applicability Modification of Order Notice of Intent Extension of Order Abbreviated Notice of Intent Certificate of Compliance II. Interest(s) in the Wetlands Protection Act, M.G.L. c. 131, s. 40 affected: XXX_ Public or private water supply . XXX Ground water supply XXX Storm damage prevention XXX Prevention of pollution Protection of land containing shellfish Protection of fisheries III. Resource areas subject to protection: XXX Bank Ocean XZg Fresh water wetland Estuary _ Coastal wetland XXX Creek _ Beach XXX River _ Dune bordering on: XXX Stream Flat XXX Pond _ — XXX Marsh Lake Swamp Land under any of the water bodies listed above Land subject to tidal action Land subject to coastal storm flowage Land subject to flooding IV. Comments : V. Proposed conditions: y Conservation Aide Date Form 9- �- OEOE File No. 64-73 (ro beproWded by DEDE/ — Commonwealth crtyrrow Salem, MA I - of Massachusetts - ', — Applicant Richard Ranone Enforcement Order Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act, G.L. c- 131, §41) From City of Salem Conservation Commission 1lssungAuthority To Mr. Richard RnaQne/Joseph Ragone - - Date of Issuance June 51 1984 Property lot/parcel number,address Swampscott Rd. , Salem, MA Essex Registry of Deeds Book 29, Page 7091, Certificate 38764. . Extent and type of.activity: Fill used in this ,project is in violation of Item #5_, Page 2,. of the Salem Conservation Oreder of Conditions issued on 3/12/81 and dated 2/17/81. The Salem Conservation Commsission has determined that the activity described above is in violation of the Wetlands Protection Act,G.L c. 131,§40,and the Regulations promulgated pur- suant thereto 31 OICMR 10.00,because: ❑ Said activity has beenfis being conducted without a valid Order of Conditions. Q Said activity has been/is being conducted in violation of an Order of Conditions issued to Ri rh=l Ragone/Joseph Raeone ,dated 3/12/81 File number 64-73 Condition number(s) 5 ❑ Other(specify) . . The City of Salem Conservation Commssion her�!byorders the following: E3 The property owner, his agents,permittees and all others shall immediately cease arddesist from further activity affecting the wetland portion of this property. ❑ Wetland alterations resulting from said activity shall be corrected andthe site retumed to itsoriginal con- dition. 9-1 ❑ Completed application forms and plans as required by the Act and Regulations shall be filed with the on or before (date), and no further work shall be performed until a public hearing has been held and an Order of Conditions has been issued to regulate said work.Application forms are available at: ® The property owner shall take.every reasonable step to prevent further violations of the act_ ❑ Other(specify) Failure to comply with this Order may constitute grounds for legal action.Massachusetts General taws Chap- ter 131,Section 40 provides: Whoever violates any provision of this section shall be punished by a fine of not more than one thousand dollars or by imprisonment for not more than six months or both. Each day or portion thereof of continuing violation shall constitute a separate offense_ Questions regarding this Enforcement Order should be directed to: Charles Frederiksen, Salem Conservation, 744-4580 Issued by Philip D., Moran, Chairman Signature(s) T t-lit 1... k Champ-Frederiksen (Signature of delivery person t' or certified mail number) 'µ g-2 Ei - 86 Form 3 - 0E0E Pile No. IT, be provitled by DEOEI ac h Commonwealth ! .,, Ciry/Town 1= of Massachusetts Applicant is Notice of Intent Under the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act, G.L. c. 131, §40 and Application for a Department of the Army Permit Part I:General Information t. Location:Street Address 38 Swampscott Road, Salem, MA Lot Number Parcel 66 2. Project:Type Commercial Description Small tenant business park consisting of approximately 20 , 000 square feet of small tenant industrial , warehouse and office space, and 100 ,000 ,sq. feet of self storage and manufacturing space for commercial industrial and residential use. This space is housed in one and two-story structures . 3. Registry: Counry - Essex Current Book &Page Certificate(it Registered Land) Title No . 38764 Essex South Register 4. Applicant David L. Ebershoff, Ebershoff & Company Tel 303-980-8686 Address 777 S. Wadsworth Blvd. , Suite 206 , Lakewood, CO 80226 5, Property Owner Joseph G. Ragone Tel. 607-484-8500 437 Main Street, Lynnfield, MA 01940 Address Rizzo Associates , Inc. Tel 617-651-3401 8. Representative 235 W. Central St. , Natick, MA 01760 Address 7. Have the Conservation Commission and the DEOE Regional Office each been sent„by certified mail or hand delivery, 2 copies of completed Notice of Intent,with supporting plans and documents? Yes No NOTE: This filing is a modification and extension to the Order of Conditions issued for the site .to Joseph G. Ragone on March 12 , 1981 . The current extension of this Order expires March 1, 1985 . A description of the current Order of Conditions is included in the attached report. 8"7 8. Have all obtainable permits,variances and approvals required by local by-law been obtained? Yes ❑ No 63 Obtained: Applied For: Not Applied For: Special Permit, Building Permit Wetland and Plood Hazard Districts, Planning Board. 9. Is any portion of the site subject to a Wetlands Restriction Order pursuant to G.L.c. 131, 140A or G.L. c. 130, §1057 Yes ❑ No 10. Ust all plans and supporting documents submitted with this Notice of Intent. Identifying Number/Letter ' Title, Date Development Report (DR) Proposed Ebershoff Development Report, Swampscott Road, Salem, February 8 , 198' Hazardous Waste Report (HWR) Exhibit A, Site Assessment Summary Relative to the Massachusetts Superfun, Act, December 11 , 1984 S1 Site Plan (with utilities) S2 Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control S3 Detail Sheet 11.Check those resource areas within which work is proposed: (a) ® Buffer Zone (b)Inland: (3 Bank• Land Subject to Flooding, 0 Bordering Vegetated Wetland' Q Bordering ® Land Under Water Body 8 Waterway' ❑ Isolated (c)Coastal: ❑ Land Under the Ocean ❑ I Designated Port Area ❑ Coastal Beech' ❑ Coastal Dune ❑ Barrier Beach ❑ Coastal Bank ❑ Rocky Intertidal Shore' ❑ Salt Marsh ❑ Land Under Salt Pond• ❑ Land Containing Shellfish' ❑ Fish Run' 'Likely to involve U.S. Army Corps of Engineers concurrent jurisdiction. See General Instructions for Completing Notice of Intent. 3-2 Part Ik Site Description Indicate which of the following information has been provided (on a plan, in narrative description or calcula- lions)to clearly, completely and accurately describe existing site conditions. Identifying Number/Letter (of plan, narrative or calculations) Natural Features: DR Soils DRVegetationDR,S1 S2 , S3— DR, S1 , S2 Topography Open water bodies(Including ponds and lakes) DR, S1 , S 2 Flowing water bodies(Includlnq streams and rivers) DR DR, H[9R Public and private surface water and ground water supplies on or within 100 feet of site � Maximum annual ground water elevations with dates arid location of test Boundaries of resource areas checked under Part I, item 11 above Other Man-made Features: DR, S1, S2 , S3 Structures(such as buildings,piers, towers and headwalls) DR, S2 Drainage and flood control facilities at the site and immediately off the site, including DR, S1 culverts and open channels (with inverts), dams and dikes I Subsurface sewage disposal systems - DR, S1 Underground utilities DR, S1 , S 2 ,S 3 Roadways and parking areas DR, S1 Property boundaries, easements and rights-of-way Other Part III:Work Description Indicate which of the following information has been provided(on a plan, in narrative description or calcula- tions) to clearly, completely and accurately describe work proposed within each of the resource areas checked in Part I,item 11 above. Identifying Number/Letter (of plan, narrative or calculations) Planview arid Cross Section of: DR, S1 , S2 , S3 Structures (such as buildings,piers, towers and headwalls) DR, .Ste— Drainage and flood control facilities, including culverts and open channels(with inverts), DR1__S1, S dams and dikes Subsurface sewage disposal systems&underground utilities DR, S2 Filling, dredging and excavating, indicating volume and composition of material Compensatory storage areas,where required in accordance with Part III, Section 10:57 (4) of the regulations Other Point Source Discharge Description of characteristics of discharge from poir)t source (both closed and open channel), when point of discharge falls within resource area checked under Part 1, item 11 above, as supported by standard engineering calculations, data and plans, including but not limited to the following: 3.3 89 �. 1. Delineation of the drainage area contributing to the point of discharge; 2. Pre-and post-development peak run-off from the drainage area,at the point of discharge, for at least the 10-year and 100-year frequency storm; 3. Pre-and post-development rate of infiltration contributing to the resource area checked under Part I, item 11 above; 4. Estimated water quality characteristics of pre-and post-development run-off at the point of discharge. Part IV:Mitigating Measures 1. Clearly, completely and accurately describe,with reference to supporting plans and calculations where necessary: R (a) All measures and designs proposed to meet the performance standards set forth under each re- source area specified In Part II or Part III of the regulations;or (b) why the presumptions set forth under each resource area specified in Part II or Part III of the regula- lions do not apply. ❑ coastal Resource Area Type: Identifying number or letter 0 Inland Bordering Vegetated Wetlands of support documents The Ebershoff deveopment proposes to remove a DRr S1rS2 ,S3 thin strip of wetlands bordering the northeasterly ' shore of the pond. This strip of bordering wet- lands will be replaced with a landscaped slope to the normal pond water elevation of 70 .5 feet. Rut' ❑ Coastal Resource Area Type: Identifying number or letter Q Imar,d Land Under a Water Body of support documents The Ebershoff development proposes to enclose a DR, S1 , S2 ,S3 120 foot section of the pond outlet channel with a 60 inch diameter culvert. This 60 inch culvert has a negligible effect, on upstream flood stage and it provides a permanent hydraulic control in the Forest River , limiting the discharge of flood flows to the lower portions of the river. PIP- 3.4 90 . ❑ Coastal Resource Area Type: Idantlfyinp number ar letter ® Intend of support documents The Ebershoff development will not significantly DR, S1 , S2 , S3 change the banks of the Forest River or the pond on the site, except as noted ' in the above two sections. 2. Clearly, completely and accurately describe,with reference to supporting plans and calculations where necessary: (a) all measures and designs to regulate work within the Buffer Zone so as to insure that said work does not alter an area specified in Part I,Section 10.02(1)(a)of these regulations;or (b) it work In the Buffer Zone will alter such an area,all measures and designs proposed to meet the performance standards established for the adjacent resource area specified in Part II or Part III of these regulations. Cl coastal I Resource Area Type Bordered By 100-Foot 01screftonery Zone: Identifying number or letter ER Intend of support documents The attached Development Report and plans DR, S1, S2 , S3 show the work to be done on the developed portion of the Site in the buffer zone. 3.5 - Jl Part V:Additional Information for a Department of Ilia Army Permit 1. COE Appllcallon No. 2. (to be provided by COE) (Name of waterway) 3. Names and addresses of properly owners adjoining your property: 4. Document other project aitornativas(i.e.,other locations and/or construction methods, pa licularly those that would eliminate the discharge of dredged or fill material Into waters or wetlands). 5. 8%T" x 11" drawings in planview aid cross-section, showing the resource area and the proposed actly Ity within the resource area. Drawings must be to scale and should be clear enough for photocopying. Certification is required fran die D'fvsion of Water Pollution Control before the Federal permit can be issued. Certification may be obtanedby contacting the Division of Water Pollution Control. 1 Writer SheetBosion, Massaahuselts 02108. VVhem die activity will lake place within die area under die Massachusetts approved Coastal Zone Management Program. the applicant certifies that his proposed activity complies with and willbe conducted in a manner that is consistent wide the approved ptogiarn. Information provided will be used in evaluating die application for a permit and is made a matter of public record through issuance of a public notice. Dscbsuie of this information is voluntary. however t necessary nfonnation is not provided, the application cannot be processed nor can a permit be issued. I hereby certify under the pains and penalties of perjurythat the foregoing Notice of Intent and accompanying plans,documents and suppazRr mpletes to the best of my knowledge. - 2/13/85 SlgrratureolApplicant slnoff Date a d 2/13/85 Signature ofApplicanl•snepresentfive Wil J. izzo , LJ L • Dale FORM "Exception to ENO Form 1818 approved by IIQUSACE. 8 Me, 1982'. 11ED IOU (TEST), I MAY 82 This document contains s total Department of the Army and State of >L.uehwe it, .ppllesllen I., • p.,mit to ebleln "'nol"lnn le perform .c tisities In United state. stars. The Dfllte of M....emenl and Budset tO8101 lin sppres td those 8neellons rr8ulred by the US Army Corp. of Enein.er.. DMB dumber 0101.001E .std uplr.tbn dale of 80 September 1988 .ppll<a". This statement aill be lel In 8 paint type. 3-6 PHILIP G. CHRISTIANSEN Professional Engineer 772 Main Street West Newbury,MA 01965 Telephone(617)465-0056 February 17, 1981 Ms. Susan Madison Conservation Commission City of Salem Salem, MA 01970 Dear Ms. Madison: As requested by the Commission, I am providing you with the attached revised drawings, details and description of the stream diversion. The attachments specifically address the questions raised about stream diversion, septic tank and leach field location, datum for elevation and stream cross section. The prime concern in site development is the diversion of the stream. We believe the procedure outlined in the attachments will minimize possible siltation caused by the diversion. Siltation generated during construction will be checked by the Southeast slope construction. Most of the rain that falls on the site during construction will flow down the old stream bed. An area will be left behind the slope for water to collect. In effect, the slope will be a dike for the construction period. Silt will settle out and the water will pass through the earthfill, porous filter and rock gabion. When the earth work on the site is complete, the silt will be removed behind the dike and the area backfilled. As mentioned at the hearing, all drainage from the site will be surface drainage and storm water drains will not be used. The rock gabions on the slopes of the completed site will prevent erosion of the slopes. Very trulyyours,yours, Phi p G. Christiansen PGC:lc enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NEW ENGLAND DIVISION. CORPS OF ENGINEERS 424 TRAPELO ROAD • WALTHAM. MASSACHUSETTS 02254 REPLY TO ATTENTION OF: NEDOD-R-24 29 December 1980 Philip G. Christiansen, P.E. 772 Main Street West Newbury, MA 01985 Dear Mr. Christiansen: This is in reference to your letter of 11 December 1980, concerning the placement of fill in wetlands for the construction of a warehouse storage facility adjacent to Swampscott Road at Salem, Mass. That work is .permitted under Title 33 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 323 as published in the 19 July 1977 Federal Register and does not require submission of an application or further processing. All work is subject to the attached conditions. . You must still obtain any state or local permits before beginning work. Should you have any questions, please contact any member of my staff at 617-894-2400, extension 332. You may call collect. Sincerely, InclROBE//! DE ISA U. as stated Sectiowchief Regulatory Branch Operations Division r; a Project S IT QRA .Gc- lA/ARE'HQL)SF Client P.-A (so ,Va Page � of Subject S7D RM WA-n5-P- 'A o w Comptd. By D6 G Date Detail Ck'd.By Date Th�E 4TTAe- H 4=X ?4-.4 -Q4 /o NS ¢ NC:I GAGGVL,47-10wS I¢2E s43in T-6 &-b THE 7-�+ Sut3M , 7-7-&-6 L ,j )-r 71+C 0fZI , nraL /�/�pL,c � T/ o/J � cuG.►4TJo .JS USE )2AIN r4L . n/77--AJs ,TY 11:�, T',.0 a 1�1, L'JJ-r C Floc 7-0/[. T/-{6 W 0 /Z / .0 J/c A4 77--3 TI F,4 T T/fE A?O POSEb oUTGeT j3t /4S S /-/-c3w v r3EL0�/ e T/FE s i�s� S' . e-5 je 6 / i /s Lj o: 46umca r+7vcr1 0x: 'r-4 6;7 C/F4N14EG u/rl � B6 z w z CcrT 742- 0 ) ti 12 Gel inrn ' 2 u t7 a J_ a. 2 1 E —B F SUMMA R Y � c , ZS Cz. 6o )' -*/( b/sc/4 ,420& $2cr-.s /9( 7 GFS r�QOt�sc� �xiK r�rscN �4kC�E' 72 .7GFs 2'/D. 6 Cr-S 2,vc eE14s r n/ .two \ b E- rtt / . 1 g r— 2 •7 3 K XIST/N(j� Z�JCR-ogsE /N ?oNn �E?r1+ 1 . 60 r.T 3, o9 FT L?2o�uscD� Project _ STOP,146E Wi412-4'Nous6- Client Page of Subject $ 7-0 fie r•-i W •471:A FG0 ,j Comptd. By ?6-r- Date Detail Ck'd. By Date L ow No Ex/Siiv6 /SND I''2v ?o5 a--b Sr0 f2M w4Tizl2 FCows 114uc n/��/U G 4A u t-.4 Tail L(S/Nfr. C FA, To,LS of B wrI4 .25 ////E .2 ocAGTOTHE Ex�S7"i,U Ga npYJ r26 a F T146, X�e#4/,0 446E ABxA / k.) 14 SLE' y'/fE -f A6- TQQ Tj/E P65s/6LE r-u TU RE be Utr<o(�)AILr:W OF THE y�r2ArnrAdE ,q,QEq, E•1ClST/Il/6i CUnJA r'T/urv$ l� � z.S" .. �i`/E Fr 2.s T D C TIf6 ��.t.o w i •.l 4 r�/LI N TD U 73 5/fvwS 't"� Kv v F.ecn'ti w AnN1h 7T1./E A&sul.7'0+U6j r-brJ It- c��PTlf �¢ va a � rttT ri m FGo w w a iI-tF f�o �rN 8F7- ovt7Q Nvfov* F- N T//C- ov TC-E7 PGu�J &V-C FfC-S 4 .#114< 6P 3 , /r, C FS Olt u t = F6 ',o,til 6 IL T/qE FC o r.j F,2.0 rr �Q r4r ••�•9G, C /�1er >4s 48; c wNa p /s z a 5 N-0w N r N 7-H-er s er-L,-,t� Sc-T o r C H ✓�iL. h b /S B L G H C Ai( C � QSMIN S r nGtr T/,rF• /?J-lb Ou TCC- l 4N D TIfE FC uwc Ftvw" 6e- Aar LAar oFF5e7" &Y s/ thio. 77/4�5- FLvw OF 82. GFS rS f"� /�/4X/m 4.Nt FQ,oi.-� Tl-Fe 5 , 725" > o Rost+� C"" oN rTf cr7S 4f= ,ZS �I vr>2.T/lu 6> 7fF15" �LJws r/LuY-, 13 �r�� G r� ro ri+F r�o�vt� 4101) /¢SSJ/t7rn1 (7 a. 7-7?-,9pc2-vrZ�, 4G pJT(tT GI+F}NNtZ /0 =T av I DC= a,) 17-/4 S, DE 54-0106-5 of 2: 1 ^4x 3z /• 5/2 FT TI{� /r/�3/c O�TF7-ow wUU L1? �3E 8Z• S CFS t� Project Client Page 13 of Subject Comptd. By Date Detail Ck'd.By Date T/�E 0 u 77�T / GcYv 2�r rrs Gt ry b��2 ��rj sn�, c� rf"b 64 7-/u7.S .4-/( Y T-M5— A-7.> U A ^J T46E 0P THE P/ oposer- A 7-17�.47' IT- Sy T-SY z7 nn, fu , 7-/.// 5 Goc/G f� 3, of ,vEN EF/ l ry 5 7-04n7 G0/U h'. / 77tl�7.c 4--� o✓v 5 i/Zf';�q t•A o l-- r v-d S/ 7Z, /N 31&-pT/f FJ.e- T/fE �/LOPOSE7� /=LduJ Du6r&, Flow ..,)oul,a 13E . 2yF7— //-/'E �/ =eux� Azrst u.o�.�a .r/cK��sE 7-/5 oo7Z--r- w . 7fEza FCo, f=.2u� T/fF s t ro so. , w /i a T, #0d J rx /-774-- z Z pLFZ -, 6 OGL u A f. CcT S M / n-5 / u/ THrsYC vrou/tF Q _y /7' /s ins1e, /vr > /c .¢.✓T 6 Y 7-HE t/KI6 THE /�>.oeOPosE�a POvi) U o U TL t;`T /!t74-c H ES Ts %� r 72 M E W S 0 a J 4'X/ _ S7-, tola 60/J'b� 17-1 o ri S a rae- / e5 9. Z:�, : Zt s HOw THE AY 4X. %n FC ow ?o T'Hc r��►b -J� OW -6-t-Y— FCO-0 A'IJD T1+F 01.1/ NErbrir rA-e /VM19/c F'G,1 rH T,,c2 . 75 G7' -77/E 415' A"Z-07 S•oGc-- 7-h`F PC�9-Y i�i„�a 4l�rscslv�6E' /s oFFS�-T F.P.I/r►7 Project Client Page—.L_of Subject Comptd. By Date Detail Ck'd.By Date 7W-(s n7s4X( /Wk . 7 6j. S/ ow// 1 w/lNoT cU--7 t"I 9-peu, c7/ts L•tF ofA, S 19- pe 0 0 Pos��� /}✓!JJ ('9-55 (/� /� b R- i� N/�E�J , 1, Ou TCe i Cif '/E-L. —M- s �Z' scapus 2: ?NE /�(4Jc (moo .� JepT/f 1�u G/LL SE 3. o Cj /=% n I�gX IPO. D o u rPLo. Z/O , 6 C+& 22- m/A1 w c != c-rr5 T/f-e /�/�x/•+,(,f 14.4.e.l,6- Z (n S,nC> / TS it7Ryc/.� u..n 4t` Z Q w Sm/o. /9 72 r�/.� ( Tw / /� U /a rL � PG�4 /C t�(SG /f/4LC c` Zvi TE 6 iL C7-AIrt- �Ywose7� T-Lv Z/o CFS ( s a ✓f-TGrxG-7c(5 ?/n 6, / lP7 C FSS /nc2rrrrsc ( � PvY. a �rprt! of P/J�osE � o ✓cn D?T/ .- ?u . Gff/+ .0 ,J&-Z, Si F-/r_,g_ r(vim Cc 5.1 - J Z �y �P u6 ,-7 6. /4 C F.-c.rot o f 6 $ F T. -: F A /o t �>6-7 CN/4/v,'JeL. e7L6 Us ��� •Project Client Page of Subject Comptd.By Date Detail Ck'd.By Date 30v c Fs, w )h-;�tf �s S o icr+a rbhc TIFa�J ekr s �—i�vb �Co�. /7/0 wc-v G-r/Z A iJ B 177- C 1f-R u ti Lam- 0 F , i g of o v L t1 S 4,1 t l-hl /A-. /¢5 SC v L f-�L rc7-� C�Trt o F- o ,c• , y F i o u en G-X/ s 7-1�U6a C0AJ '4:. AJ r��Cs LIQ Zi T/Jz�nv-x:-ocE &ii. H-RN^JeT Ts f4 r#'> t o-L�, f i>✓tL f,, t T/4 /fir B F-T W NC-L, (-.4-T-1 o Z Z /�oND. %/fes PONa� ons. TE /s b ��y 2•G e4 :6�T AA�of . ,r� G� Q t,,-j •a- r&-rc- S J IL F-A-C4ES G n / R r s A.v /I J J, i/1, i sv C iy- v 2 •>'c ec s. T/fes v s c U n /s C'-r�iSG%L Ll 7 u , 2 IL fnc 2�'r+-ses , w 67,e—� 7&s Prolan Client Page /6 of Subject Comptd.By Date Detail CWT By Date ,I i CLIENT RPGiNE DATE 2/8/81 DESIGN CONDITIONS EXISTING -A - ?oi.rU �%-taw Odr &tJ i STORM PERIOD TP40 IS-1,C1 C -ACTOR IS PREP TINE I Q VALUE 5FAcus MIN - 1-FS i NFLU 1 PATH 1 5 r ij 7.5 9.375 - 12.!5 .iiJ '1yC 113 5.8 26.825 W 710 4.5 55. 12 5 d 5 35 4 A Z 52 GO 2.75 35.75 N 47 71 2.4 28.2 `-.G F- 0 _5 .2. 15 6.9��1 .l N �3R . 1 1.575 t1 95 - 0 x _ U a CHANNEL IS TRAPEZOIDAL ic4 CHPNNEL WIDTH IS 4 FT xSLOPE IS 1.5E-03 n' COEFFICIENT OF ROUGHNESS IS06 SIZE OF STORAGE POND IS _ ACRES ;;''' TOTAL F:EI!ISED FLOW PATH INFLOW OUTFLOW OUTFLOW TINE 1--VALUE ACCUH f -UALIE PI CUH MIN CFS CU FT CF-3 CU FT 6.81818182 1636.36364 1.01834444E-03 .428807734 4 20.28125 8140.22728 .0126471442 6.55443694 24 45.0958334 23830. 7273 .0812722301 45.5701074 32 53.+175 47587.7273 .289896109 184.72 124 461 4SA5 72213.7273 .;60499601 501.760049 4i; 43.55 54765.7273 1. 12470807 1041.61492 56 38.35 114021.727 1.61668581 1817.62911 64 33.0045455 . 131146.818 2.619496123 2825.6105 72 26.978125 145542.659 2.54381666 40146.6425 R' l 16.51875 155981.909 _.:+4=1346423 5440.30532 3.74 160844Oct.,? 3. 113-32221 6434.64994 yF 0 161741:609 7_ 1 P177R41 g_4Z ::452 33443 i 104 L1 1617 41.609 3. 12543787 04952.WE: y 1617 41 .60ty z%07506886, 11428.8177 112 r 52 000.r-_f072 1�0 Gi 1F1741.60.� 3.02'.�"r811 12'-; 127, 0 161741,6Cr 2.478rl 526 14309.6545 0 161741.604 2.922,89856 15715.5258 Client Page of Project Comptd. By Date Subject Ck'd.By Date Detail i RECHANNEL ;;I:3Ep POND UEL4CIT4' , TIRE STORAGE DEPTH i_II FT FT FP-- 1635.27483 .0 5-414.009 8. 1635.8748` 0144440456 .093.'_.476488 _;1 3.66713 .0622411068 16 `.� 23755. 1572 . 15 'Ci1Cti;:31 . 19100361 I 4739; i07 362710492 302731754 _2 1711.96 - - - 399363/92 :'}41 f1(•11.96f •548.7 Fi�1k1:-_ �- 1 53324. 10 4 .714142236 .4764628.24 56 _ .53913 5263 ��; 11_2"-'Fi4.F_�+5_8 .S52G1721y 3 208 .58194986 .589966637 72 14_491. '- ,2767 ,1000 33 1.0'2'• i3r i9 .6,- -.�. 8 72 141456.01? cr - 1543541.604 1. 15198656 .656853943 6i �aGty j3, 1. 1777571: .686812:�4_t1 MAX 153 - 03 :4t ^5 1 46 �__;_ .F;GS 0 38 SE, 1512_9.275 i. l( _ lc 1 J51786.624 1. 16153064 .664+750645 14.14502_56 .65643184 5 154.1312.7:31 1. 1ti_"'��-=� 120, .65216:9.338 124=t 14r36e+,662 1, 13G1236Cs �--- 147431.`355 1. 1281'906:5 .64 962322 13 .6438.096?5 1�t.; 146026.083 1. 11?43253 w a. w B° z I v CFS '� 2NL ET --- � y �IL D I 1 IL +{ 20, f 0 TLET� -- 20 40 6o 80 0o Izo MIM 3i:�_E I:= 2 froject Client Page A o Subject _m _ _ _, _. E --- — . LI DT RA,I DP 2/8/2-1 . . DEi+ CONDITIONS GIST Ryo STORM PERIOD e 401�a eFsm IS .25 AREA TIME I . @ GLUE CFS .. . . . � IRL amm I 4 . 19 - G . 23 2 \/ G. 2:3 74 As 25.95 . 4 - %3 34.R . ® 4 : a.5 4 » k.mi Q I 2.35 24.08 — - 2- e. s 22 D4 \} b. 7 . 1 ` 12 B �1 \7 % . I+L£ PATH 2 . 3 : !e :4: \\ //75 . / %% - Js 3 AI - a a. 7 7 - /4 ws ^ P - : /. B g . : � a: m 257 \eys e m 2 ® PAR+ mm 3 6 g 14.25 § GS 25 _ . \ 125 7 45 \4 4.s ` , - : 4. 17- .'5 / 2 z : e . 0 o / 7 @ R p J �71 0 451 Page of Project Client Subject Comptd.By Date Detail Ck'd. By Date TOTAL I REUISED FLOW PATH ` TIHE O-VALUE M I F4' I-FS 11.6984474 1 ; 17.7277162 �7 ?7.2775 �5.2028334 45 R I.46 i'1 154 54 (1 1 +4c4 63 5$.944769' -i �l_i,9:i ,c i iG ,1 41,7069444 S el 26.0057 292 i 99 ti c . 1� 1 r,;_; 4l 117 `-1 1:_G 41 135 0 . 44 Li w 15? -i a Z w a z a Z U CL J Z IL Project Client Page hof Subject Comptd.By Date Detail Ck'd. By Date CLIENT RAGCINE DATE 2/8/811 DESIGN i_ONDITIONS PROPOSED N+E+i: j STORM PERIOD TP 40 100YR C. FACTOR I: .25 pRFH TIME I 0 UPL UE roP'Aclei MIN - CFS 7NFLOH PATH 1 �q S 11 ' 1;=_ _, 4 -.c C is -_, f5 14v G� J 55. 125 41i 7144 4..C i L _ =c2 52 75 4 w60_�L 47 j W 7-3. - 79 4075 Z7. 441 1 1.575 :i5 in x INFLON PATH 2 L3 4 t F"5 c a 1r 5 24 5. 16. '2 - 4.5 -•5.875 ;4.4_i;' �c :70.'9375 4541 F l4 J c 2.:35 24.0875 • 5 4 17.75 1 11 55 c ,� Fs. 1� 25- �.� INFLOW.. PATH 1 G _'r_ 12 7 �Vi4ri =.n .7 F 14 -- cmc 7 17 4_i,._ cr 4 4 .95 14.5 11 '_ .95 4 4. 1 8C Rr_7 _ -,:'� 17 . =L - , i 9. 1n75 i7. 1l3.5 91 2.05 1.74175 :i4 Y_1 I r Project 2 G Client page of _�- Subject ComDtd.By Date Detail Ck'd. By Dale CHANNEL I-_- TRAPEZOIDAL 2e 1 CHANNEL WIDTH I6 161 FT SLOPE IS 4.4E-03 ! COEFFICIENT OF ROUGHNESS IS .025 SIZE OF STORAGE FOND IS 3 ACRES TOTAL i �,*EU I=,ED FLOW PATH INFLOW OUTFLOW OUTFLOW TIME C-t1ALJE ACCUN 1-!-uAL1UE RCCUH H i N CFS CU FT CFS Ia 1 FT 8 10.7168485 2572.04364 .035906'-838 17.2354116x , 16 3.3. 1137262 13091.3816 .457284889 236.731763 24 f:342 7 08 3 40084 .9258 3.06097526 526 1 A5.99989 ' 32 12.1. 463333 88754.3759 11.9990236 746- 1i22- I 40 126.927885 148848.268 29.5709242 21659.57461 46 117.231731 2616498.576 50.4246866 46103.4244 56 99.635577 257598.73 68.53469011 79O00.0758 64 87,0320455 302398.959 78.9649145 116907.235 72 74,935625 341271.2 0 5611 131 M Az 156532.563 . Gel 53.7032987 .372144.542 80..3760735 195114.039 i_': 24.7373958 390970.309 72.5542685 2239401.088 W H C1 796907.284 59.815382 258651.471 d 16,4 0 3969017.284 45.7347081 2806614. 131 Z 112 0 396907.284 34.3646301 297044-. 153 N 120 0 396907.284 26.4976477 3O9818.4124 Z 1 z'=; 0 396907.284 21.01269~1 3199414. 11v`i Q - 1361 tai 3-469017. ,4 .05 3x7119 328089.9 F t 2'_ 1 7 N E RVISED POND POND CHANNEL LJ TINE STORAGE DEPTH JELOCITY pjIN CII FT FT FPS ti d . 2554.80862 554 n-862 .02255782 14 .3162151.36 .J 16, 12854.9498 . 0983673844 .842361005 = 24 38374.926 .293655693 1.73145674 a 32 81288.8446 . 622045031 22045031 - _:1013839 40 127188.69.3 .973293543 3.73624556 4.1 V0395. 152 1.227.38867 4.34280596 56 178598.654 1.366138698 4.67387564 64 185495.724 1.41946529 m6c 4.8t134714-1 72 184738.637 1.413671.85 4 R'�4R?119 MAK K 177030.503 1.35468705 4.72269051 88 161030.221 1.2322484 4.48292881 SE. 138255.813 1. -57i72 24 4. 10454942 4942 104 115303. 153 .889984335 3.68879409 M2 99808. 1.304 . 7637597 88 3.3.1.745679 120 87089.2595 .856431432 3.04970921 1,_ i 77003. 1654 584249812 2.81093274 136 68817.3837 .526609915 2.60916230 Project , -_ Client Page mot Subject Comptd. By Date Detail Ck'd. By Date i COM SINE D .S�.J f-LOW 9 6 �- i Cgs i � �6r_�si syr ,' a tA, 3 z ld� O - 32. 6H 96 /28 /bo /yL Mii✓ Li a Z w U) Z F m 2 U C7 a _J 2 IL Project Client Pageof Subject Comptd.By Date Detail Ck'd. By Date CLIENT RAGFINE DATE =!_1 DESIGN CONDITIONS EXIST STORM PERIOD TP40 100 C FACTOR IS ,25 HRFA TINE I 0 VALUE �F Acet3 MIN - I=F~ I 1 HR 0 4J PATH 1 w a 14i i 4 -' Zc F;ar S.2625 c W .�. i 1J . 1 � -,c 5. 7 fA Z = ce ( �c # _. i Q .J Je� 4.345-255 _ 41 Fc � 4_i pl_t t_i 47 J L:4 :iFi a 'Project m, Page ® . Subject _mm Date _, Cm By Dale NIDI RHGONE DATE yeb _ . BSI+ CONDITIONS THIS \ STORM PERIOD ekl00G \ C FACTOR S .6 , yA TIME, I @ mqE �km PAN . - 'J IRLG PATH ! , a 222.5 /3 19 5.6' 6428 117 / 4.s_ . ! a y F, 4 !043 52 7 /4 7.68 Li f .5 . . � : #22 17, , \ M 2 § : 6 / :3. ' 2 I - -- -in CHANNEL IS m+ mmL e4 § GAa WIDTH IS 4 q QE S 1.5E-03 e e•R2IENT OF ROUGHNESS S -OR- SI-7E mS-7E R 7mmE PONDS 3 ACRS I TOTS :Dlmo F w mm Immo, OUTFLOW mFSH 2+ VALUE Rr, Q- a R A., «N CF; DFT CFS DR R. R4 3K7. w Algm�p a ! Ria 48.675 19 5 .05440547 7. 5293 24 lm.d57193.7455 72297 imam 129.3 /40.94e 1.24586842 794.010111 22 173-2 12.me 3833969+ 2547154 w 104. 9 22642.748 4.RI159256 4463.87987 . m 92.04eJB.'--Z'9447854am 6.88 DTR 7769.28224 G .2 mm! »47 .+472 ! 3648 64.7475 349302.12 10.71 41 1713.4211 - &G« 1477\/ 2311449 eua 9 /pd 7m3.�� l3 11287 291703283 e yma.m2 9 83 7 m_ 35374.3145 66 a Ada.mz R.Rlme 4143-86K nz Ia.mz e:mlmk 47318.4662 !9 e 7@e.m2 11 .914712R 53-9- !D e 2e..z R.ml a me R 176 o 7E79. 2 11.2612A-35 6 4 0a m Project 2E Client Page IS of _�� 'Subject Comptd. By Date Detail Ck'd. By Date RED)T=•ED POND POND 1_HPNNEL TIME STORAGE DEPTH VELOCITY 1111A CII FT FT 8 392.5. 1698 FPS Gt346.�r 4999 .0631 x716_755 1l: 19508.3277 442837 93 24 �' �r.f.; . 1 . �_ .1 , 11=;7.7,�f,1�i -- _6997.7. 22 .43fi 6278- 11 34Lit ,:i.?� o-.',l:cr•'1 .34c3:S599 44.1 _.6 r 82166 7 .542390692 171155,63 1,30975383 .714914759 4•' ',_'4_71.5,ri66 1 .69891235 -�. .c:.r•16:j5:i99 c 265-RR-;m. ' 65-RR _1_ 9:F' 2.0134 h 02 2 .9617610p 74 1 t_r2 f 1.5,732 2.31645035 1.049798(7- 332126.961 2.541520-63 1. 11774532 80. 351364.595 .6^8, 404 1. 16132447 R8 356855.494 2 7�G 7 5R^4 1 17742,AM/4X 6 352805.548 2.69976697 1. 16528968 104 346746.993 2.65340521 1. 151822549 112 340961.396 2.60836697 1. 13860098 1201 335142.334 2.5646031 1.12568003 W 12-: 32'9583.236 2.52206333 u 136 32417x7.859 2.4806998, 1. 1130_32'.. ' 5 r 1. 1007 106,2 Z W a /3Zi I' i U 95 cry IL ; 71 6 6 F- a. -a Ir r —ml-77 7— _ ' 33 r t+. L 33 g(. e 9 /3 MIN {i F I:_ 1.27-255,314 i Project Client Page 11O of �fi Subject Comptd.By - Date Detail Ck'd.By Date 1 I CLIENT F;uh IINE DATE =i DE'=.16N CONDITIONS EXIST E+C+D STORM PERIOD TF 40 iOOYR C FACTOR I'3 .6 RF.FA TINE I 0 UALUE +-lI�2eS h1I N - CF's Ir;F'i 04'{ PATH 1 4 1q F:.5 15.8 C 1' ;39 27, 34 4.5 62. 1 -.4 ti '` :1 .540 41 ,� '14-15 5 Li :15 F_:4 2.'5 74.'x., a 41 2.,5 57.81 1 Z _ 5 S;_ 4' .'i_ VI L i - 1 _ � 1C 'z 2.5 Gi 101 1.95 4i to INFLOH PATH C C x v _ I .. 1.5552 L I.'i a 4.6 5h.5 c ,l 4.4 91.41n = 34.5 4. 1 . 48 '. '5 IzG. F_�4 i _ F { 54 42 4 1` O' _ _ 4_t5 Ic - r4. .L15 4.145 i :i Ci• 9;_ � 1 INFLOH PATH ? D i C r 14_1 34.2 - R.5 2v`. 5e ( 1C v C 17 . 1 v � 4 i;.68. _ ` 1 - .!i :_1e 91r 3.4 c c _ c { __ It Ij t.5 2.6 61 :�1 l9 Li Li .1c 41 41 zt- Project Client Page 1-7 i Subject Comptd. By Date Detail CW&BV Date TOTAL i F;EUI ECI FLOH PATH TIME O—VALUE MIN I_F4 _ _ I C. 42.5465108. 27 89.466 36 180.4866 14F 7'1 +77 :}_� MAX — Y 5 4 172.377415-2 . 63 141.467446 72 122.382 61 100.096667 R-2.41375 7.0 10 Es. Cl 117 4_i 12C, 09 1;5 0 w 144 `=' n C 1_�. 9 Z w N Z a K 2 U a J_ S a "s Project [/ Client Page of Subject Comptd. By Date Detail Ck'd. By Date CLIENT RAGONF_ i DATE ✓r:."c:I DE_.IGN CANDITIOR'3' EXIST STORM PERIOD TP40 IHE, C FACTOR IS I, AREA TIME I G! t:[PLUE SF MIN - CF DDR i_Li PATH I Ce 5 _ n 5.7 -,5 F 1 1 Z `. i 4 Z 55 Q D k5 2. 11 L1 L_i li O tIi a _J 2 a . Project m- _ , �ubjm __ & Date °" ea By D _ CA :2! E ; DATE 2yg BmI+. CONDITIONS PR 3m +B: ST! PERIOD TP40 !mm E FACTOR IS 3 'REA . 2R I @m±E AC : S Wr ; . I+EG me 1 # w R3 g &e 64.72 2 a s RQ 4-31 A AS l7 3 9 J . 4 !G 3 9 m se m3 47 m 644 F.7.G'.; uj . J /y awz E . s ! . : \ S : : \ . I9LH mm 2 / . ¢ 4 g G§ Sa u 11. 1 G S2 a _ y is 623 ; 32.4 7 7. 4.2 81.64@ j . j . d &e !C15.3 - ƒ : m .a 41 . e /k 931 . Z3 P3 84 64242.9 s m 641 � 2 ! 12.5S 2 1 e y 4 @ IRLamm 3 .& .a R me 1.79 e g e 20.S,:' y J 2 e m.m 7%43 9 4.4 g.m a 9 Al m.m 7 m se 6J 2 644 53.64 a 2 .G \ D / 1 22.m ae / &7 4.35 Project Client Page 01 Z_ Subject Comptd. By One Detail CWT By Date CHANNEL IS TRAPEZOIDIAL 1 CHANHEL WIDTH IS 8 FT SLOPE IS 4.4E-03 r_.i1EFFICIENT OF ROUGHNESS IS .025 SIZE OF STORAGE POND IS 3 ACRES TOTAL REU I SED FLOW PATH INFLOW OUTFLOW OUTFLOW TIME &VALUE ACi_:UH Q-VALUE ACCUH MIN CFS CII FT CFS CII FT 9 25,7204964 6172,90477 . 122941559 59,0119482 Q 79.4723429 31419.3154 1.5405207 793.461885 24 1901,4225 96194.='221 9.93920237 _ 5569.27902 ,,� 256.31_ 22 13010.502 37.0201334_ 2 333 ..9452 L1 4 3434.626423 357235.844 86. x7390912 64973.70+93 , 42, 271.376154 4955.16.582 142.914694 133572.782 56 239. 125.385 618236.952 185.26762 222501.20 � 64 203.636909 725699.902 206.820802 321775.205 72 179. 1255 818762.881 2101 x1570:3 MAX 42'2842.603 80 128.887917 392686. 1 2001.481112 519073.537 3.5.3r 8- 59.36975 937867.941 177.445951 604247.593 W -i6 0 x+52116.681 143. 17676 672972.438 a Z 1014 0 952116.881 106..491727 724088.467 W 112 0 952116.681_ r 7.5107071 761233.606 `^ 0t 35'2118.681 57.'39611964 789128.9 Z 12kt ¢ 12'-; 121 952116.681 44.7 09659 810623.764 952116.681 35.5104707 827668.79 y 136 6i x RELII=:EO F'DIND POND CHARNEL TIRE STORAGE DEPTH VELOCITY MIN CU FT FT FP: ° - 6113.89278 0539829482 .56.3910743 J 6 30620.8539 .234.319359 1.47673131 It. 24 90624.9431 .693487474 2.918.38369 32 189671.557 1.45141993 4.4882424 40 292262. 135 2.2364718 5.69852439 WD 362023.82 2.77030777 &42395843 56 .i957�_ 3.02828078 6.78075621 _ 35,732�.� 403924.697 I.Q9171=50 9 RX770Q 72 3.359;'0.27; MKyC r ' 3.02969297 6.858'22525 12 n'r'i 373612.564 G.85n._Ip809 6.68576668 66F'.8 _ 8611 333620.348 2.55295644 6.34176384 316 279144.243 h13609001 5.81163895 104 228028.214 1.74493583 5.22093947 112 19082.3.0174 1.46023167 4.71380094 120 162987.78 1.24722819 4.29539305 1 : 141492.917 1 .08274347 3.94713057 13- 124447.891 .952310152 3.65243039 6 Project Client Page 21 of 2.�4 Subject Comptd. By Date Detail Ck'd. By Date I 1 rl W- 77 r,T �. I / DUTLEi 77 15,q 231 3o8 M �� ni i Z w w z Q =;CH_E IS 6230 '6316- N_ B.' 2 U t7 a J S CL 22- & of _r . m_ ® m . _ptd. E ° Detail Ck'd. By Date . IDT �f . . mz 2/9/81 DESIGN CONEITI.; PROPOSED A+: 7ORMtRmm ?40100G CFACTOR R .25 . @ mqE . � :+A � g+ 1 CFS � �h�6 Hill - ImL; PATH ! A . R . \ 5 : _18.5 g 2625 W 25 TO 4.5 55. 12 4 - 4 52 z k «52 3 : 35.75 § 4 : \ .ys ( 1� y 5 79 \ � 6.9875 .5 I : -- - \ I+L, mq \ a . § 4 15 6.5 s ƒ p.5 24 5.2 16.25 23 y : 25 . - 25 4.2 .y » ® . 45 9 - 43.875 5 q m 30.S775 84 - 2 24.0875 3\ - \ 87..5 ! R.55 7 7Ca123 : p 2 . 7 i I+L, mm 3 6 . y g ca .Ga 119 \/ 8.7 E. 23.575 20.5 27 7/ 31 4.437.95 A © =± — © 2.75 5S 6 01 a2.4 2 § /3 2 32 Q ae ls .5 � ! 1.73375 387 _ - /5 6 2 @ Page 23 of _ 4 Client Pyolect ComPtd.By J Date Subject -J Date Ck'd.By Detail CHANNEL IS TRAPEZOIDAL 20 t CHAh4f1EL WIDTH IS 0 FT SLOPE IS 4.4E-03 Liar COEFFICIENT OF ROUGHNESS I'= SIZE OF STORAGE POND IS 3 ACRES i TOTAL OUTFLOW OTFLOW F;El1ISED FLS!}'1 PATH INFLOW Q-VALUE M_I-UM i�-VALUE HCCI M i F.= CiI FT TIME CU FT - i`I`' 10.7168485 V5r2.04364 .t_i28706354213.77805�`r5,G,` 0 G .365014108 1'c�s.98'„r '3. 113 40080.925 i F. { r '74 1F• -`' c}V_IL_1�;L1,425_ G.43.J1 _r _ 4,3427-r^ 1.-• 5G::'_x.64643 r.4 t 54 3759 4._�i_.4_�J�O '-� 7.7554 in 123.463333 r _�.2F_�ri G._..484645 .n- 7 ,427805 14814 4c1.-'r1z418 36806. _515 40 i l� ^.til 20644 `_1 ''`1c 63741.769 e,2 1 i 56. 1154532 40 5�54�„ (.i rF. 44_.6'5577 25 r- 6 574k838 45647._•243 'L� 55 3 0637 4.4.,y 6. 64 tb. ��� 4 L r r�.t-151694 130664. 11 -a 5 ..�5 3411_�l." 165154.63.4_ r 4.6�JF�G.J _•� r-, c (f- 26.3386459 -' 6483831 f 6 5; 7 _•f 1952.546 7 G. r�,�, _._•. 03645 hei,_ 68.354414 147404. nt_t 28.3366454 4116'9. - 226454.361 �;{ .r-_{''..riri4 5--1.3120157 t" �-•. 96 N 30 48.0612474 244523. 83 34, 483.684 . 1640314 267042.518 Vi it-14' F_j 3474_3.834 - 2S2606.64 n iQ_ 347483.464 30.7585872 tl 25.2261308 644715, iri, 191.1 327 483.C:84 3047 44.'24' w 16d 41 ?474x3.8 4 21.008459 Z 1 6 ti pi IND CHANNEL W F{EWWD POND UELOCITV N STORAGE DEPTH FF,= TIME FT z liItCU FT 5r LTGGS__ 3F; .3 1 80 1 107 9 U 25.8.264_9 _ _ r _;4t=1152x131 1F; 1'�23.051 .0987327493 1.71690037. a 24 ?Y723.Y1514 .296319651 _ 5 .6?383137 2.7rG418G1 S2029-083131650.513 1.00742664 3.6726339 a 40 --5 1.29853240__•240 4.27720127 4 : ^ 4 ;x0,1 4. 56 193856.961 1.4n3 4 1 .5;:155517 4.02401574 F,4 4.2945 0 it 72 2jos 6.54 4.;5G1tiF6r. 68 - 5234, 4.69221399 � 14317g,et1` 1.4782_���_ 0�; rr 4.34735988 171029.520 1.'t_1s=t76_�,i6 r 1. 13263617 4.05130295 147960. 1 74375549 '_ - r.-�--'c 1, ( .�� i 12 Gatt_1JGk1(- 11� 1c464i.365 .67--�t .1,47644274 114077.243 90 2875 5- 0 120 .786414911 ..248"61 7 10276S.701 rn Gam';} 7449 99 1 926S4.6403 .70�9G44_-, .,.1945 G•_1 136 Project Client Page of Subject Comptd. By Date Detail Ck'd.By Date j g 6 jr xLi2 N Derr b14 �ourLtT Fl ZI r ,� 8 3i 6�f 96 �zg Ir /60 mfg Ld a Z w N Z Q N 2 U 0 a _J 2 IL