Loading...
64-121 - BEVERLY HARBOR, SALEM CORPORATE BOUNDARY - CONSERVATION COMMISSION _ _. , . x� `.w .. r. ......... .... ...�. ` _.. ... .. . .. �r.:Y �i r' A W Form 8 DEQE File No. 6 4— 12 1 C' (To be pmvtdod by DEQE) Commonwealth ciyrrovm SALEM of Massachusetts Applicant So. Essex Sewerage District Certificate of Compliance Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act, G.L. c. 131, §40 From SALEM CONSERVAtION COMMISSION . dssuingAuthority To So . Essex Sewerage District 50 Fort Ave . Salem Ma (Name) (Address) • Date of Issuance May26 , 1989 Modified This Certificate is issued for work regulated by an Order of Conditions'issued to SES D dated 1 /4/,99 andissuedbythe Conservation Commissioi 1. Ek It is hereby certified that the work regulated by the above referenced Order of Conditions has been satisfactorily completed. 2. ❑ It is hereby certified that only the following portions of the work regulated by the above-refer. enced Order of Conditions have been satisfactorily completed:(if the Certificate of Compliance does not include the entire project,specify what portions are included.) 3. ❑ It is hereby certified that the work regulated by the above-referenced Order of Conditions was never commenced.The Order of Conditions has lapsed and is therefore no longer valid.No future work subject to regulation under the Act may be commenced without filing a new Notice of Intent and receiving anew Order of Conditions. ......................................................................................................................_..................._..........___-:............_—. • (Leave Space Blank) c 8., 4. €F 'This certificate shall be recorded in the Registry of Deeds or the Land Court for the district in November 1985 der was originally recorded ondate the land is located.The Or Y ( ) _ which _ 9 at the Registryof Essex Book - ,Page 5. ❑ The following conditions of the Order shall continue:(Set forth any conditions contained in the Final Order,such as maintenance or monitoring,which are to continue for a longer period.) Issued by SALEM CONSERVATION COMMISSION Signature(s) --- • c , 0 � a o When issued by the Conservation C ommision this Certificate must be signed by a majority of is members. o <, On this 4" day of 19 .J % before me m ° personally appeared to me known to be the > ti v person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she executed e the same as his/her free act and deed. C 0) U C1 O � V] m ro ac, Notary PublicMy ommission ex res n v ; C E v Detach on dotted line and submit to the 3 � _ y v TO Issuing Authority N C x o Please be advised that the Certificate of Compliance for the project at File Number ihas been recorded at the Registry of 0 i' and has been noted in the chain of title of the affected property on . 19- .H 19.H If recorded land,the instrument number which identifies this transaction is m It registered land,the document number which identifies this transaction is I signature Applicant 8-2 \�toN r { t. } Conservatim Commission 4 Salem. Massachusetts 01970 .{�.tf,t ssncN�. May 31 , 1989 Mr. Raymond Bouchard South Essex Sewerage District 50 Fort Avenue Salem, Ma. 01970 Dear Mr. Bouchard; Enclosed is the original and one copy of a Certificate of Compliance for South Essex Sewerage District DEQ-9 #64- 121 , issued by the Salem Conservation Commission at a meeting on May 25 , 1989 . Please file the original at the Essex County Registry of Deeds. Sincerely , athleen M. Winn Conservation Administrator Form 5 OEQE File No. 64-121 (To be crovweo by PIECE) i 7 — Commonwealth CltyiTown Salem of Massachusetts Sewers Aooiicant Q ,t1, Ecseu 8e viscr t Modified* Order of Conditions Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act G.L. c. 131, §40 From Salem Conservation Commission To South Essex Sewerage District City of Salem Park Department (Name of Applicant) (Name of property owner) Address 50 Fort Ave. Salem Address o ^^rthgt: Salam This Order is issued and delivered as follows: ❑ by hand delivery to applicant or representative on (date) by certified mail,return receipt requested on__January 4. 1989 (date) This project is located at Beverly Harbor Salem Conorate Boundan The property is recorded at the Registry of F.acax—Cn„rh Book Page Certificate(if registered) The Notice of Intent for this project was filed on _. A/A/q,; (date) The public hearing was closed on November14,1985 (date) Findings The Conservation Commission has reviewed the above-referenced Notice of d, Intent and plans and has held a public hearing on the project. Based on the information available to the Commission at this time, the rr mm r cai nn has determined that the area on which the proposed work is to be done is significant to the following interests in accordance with the Presumptions of Significance set forth in the regulations for each Area Subject to Protection Under the Act(check as appropriate)., ❑ Public water supply ❑ Flood control 2 I••and containing shellfish ❑ Private water supply ❑ Storm damage prevention Fisheries ❑ Groundwater supply Prevention of pollution ❑ Protection of wildlife habitat 5.1 Effective 11/1/87 Therefore, the Commission hereby finds that the following conditions are 1 necessary, in accordance with the Performance Standards set forth in the regulations, to protect those inter. ests checked above. The Cormnission orders that all work shall be performed in accordance with said conditions and with the Notice of Intent referenced above. To the extent that the fol. lowing conditions modify or differ from the plans, specifications or other proposals submitted with the Notice of Intent, the conditions shall control. General Conditions 1. Failure to comply with all conditions stated herein,and with all related statutes and other regulatory meas- ures,shall be deemed cause to revoke or modify this Order. 2. This Order does not grant any property rights or any exclusive privileges: it does not authorize any injury to private property or invasion of private rights. 3. This Order does not relieve the permittee or any other person of the necessity of complying with all other applicable federal, state or local statutes.ordinances, by-laws or regulations. 4. The work authorized hereunder shall be completed within three years from the date of this Order unless either of the following apply: (a) the work is a maintenance dredging project as provided for in the Act: or (b) the time for completion has been extended to a specified date more than three years, but less than five years,from the date of issuance and both that date and the special circumstances warranting the extended time period are set forth in this Order. 5. This Order may be extended by the issuing authority for one or more periods of up to three years each upon application to the issuing authority at least 30 days prior to the expiration date of the Order. 6. Any fill used in connection with this project shall be clean fill, containing no trash, refuse, rubbish or de- bris, including but not limited to lumber, bricks, plaster, wire, lath, paper, cardboard. pipe, tires. ashes, refrigerators, motor vehicles or parts of any of the foregoing. 7. No work shall be undertaken until all administrative appeal periods from this Order have elaosed or, if such an appeal has been filed. until all proceedings before the Department have been completed. 8. No work shall be undertaken until the Final Order has been recorded in the Registry of Deeds or the Lama Court for the district in which the.land is located,within the chain of title of the affected property. In the case of recorded land, the Final Order shall also be noted in the Registry's Grantor Index under the name of the owner of the land upon which the proposed work is to be done. In the case of registered land. the Final Order shall also be noted on the Land Court Certificate of Title of the owner of the land upon which the proposed work is to be done. The recording information shall be submitted to the CnmmIR3f nn on the form at the end of this Order prior to commencement of the work. 9. A sign shall be displayed at the site not less than two square feet or more than three square feet in size bearing the words, "Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering, File Number 64-121 10. Where the Department of Environmental Quality Engineering is requested to make a determination and to issue a Superseding Order, the Conservation Commission shall be a parry to all agency proceedings and hearings before the Department. 11. Upon completion at the work described herein, the applicant shall forthwith request in writing that a Certificate of Compliance be issued stating that the work has been satisfactorily completed. 12. The work shall conform to the following plans and special conditions: 5.2 1 Plans: Title Dated Signed and Stamped by: On File with: i SESD - Danvers- James Ryan, P.E. Conservation Commission Beverly Relief t Interceptor ? Attachments 8/6/85 Metcalf & Eddy accompany Notice of Intent Special Conditions(Use additional paper it necessary) The Conservation Commission shall be notified within 2 weeks prior to start of construction. *2. Tolerance of pre and post surveys shall be in substantial compliance with pre-existing conditions at the completion of the work. The applicant's consulting engineer shall submit evidence of such compliance. 3. All work shall be in accordance with the Notice of Intent, including supporting documentation and the above-referenced plans. ......................................................................................................................................................... .......................... (Leave SMCe elankl 5.3A 1 Issued By a Conservation Commission ignatu is r t t This Order mu t be signed by a majority of�rvation Commission. On this day of /J r7 u 01 R 4 19 before me personalty appeared_ `F �^A R'r,o t'� • 'A a ,,1,4 rt to me known to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she executed the same as his/her free act and deed. Notary Public My commission expires The applicant.the owner.any person aggrieved by this Order.any owner of land abutting the teed upon which the tx000sad work is to be done or my ten residents of the city or town in which such kind Is located are hereby ratified of their right to request the Gooartrnent of Environmenew Quality Engineering to issue a suoarsedkp Order.providing the request is made by csralled mW or turd delivery to rte oeoaronent within ten days from me date of Issuance of this Order.A copy of the requeat snail at the same time be sent by cxbfled Mai or nand delivery to the Conserveoon Comrmsaran and die applicant. Oetach on dotted line and submit to the prior to commencement of week. To Issuing Authbnty Please be advised prat the Order of Conditions for the protect at - File Number has been recorded at the Registry of and has been noted in the cram of title of the ahected property m accordance with General Condition a an . 19_ It recorded land. the instrument number which identities this transaction is It registered land.the document number which Identities this tranaacbon rs Signature Atiolicant 5.4A 94 1 Form s DEOEFRO No. 64-121 (To be prwded by DEOE) Commonwealth cltyrro" Salam of Massachusetts AoWcwt South Essex Sewerage District Order of Conditions Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act G.L c. 131, §40 1=rern Salem Conservation Commission To South Essex Sewerage District City of Salem Park Department (Name of Apples) (Name of property owner) Address 50 Fort Ave. , Salem Adams 9 North St. . Salem This Order is issued and delivered as follows: by hand delivery to applicant or representative on 1 .f;�-- (date) ❑ by certified mail,return receipt requested on (date) This project is located at Beverly Harbor Salem Corporate Boundary The property is recorded at the Registry of Essex-South Book Page • Certificate(if registered) The Notice of Intent for this project was filed on R 161 R 5 (date) The public hearing was dosed on November 14, 1985 (date) Findings The Conservation Commission hes reviewed the above-referencedNoticeof Intent and plans and has held a public hearing on the project. Based on the intonation available to the Commission at this time, the Cnmmi sai nn has determined that the area on which the proposed work is to be done is significant to the following interests in accordance with the Presumptions of Significance set forth in the regulations for each Area Subject to Protection Under the Act(check as appropriate): ❑ Public water supply �O /Storm damage prevention ( ❑ Private water supply m N►erention of pollution O Ground water supply 0-1(Pnd containing ahellfiaft ❑ Flood eantroi Fisheries 5.1 95 Therefore,the Commission hereby finds that the following conditions are necessary, in accordance with the Performance Standards set forth in the regulations,to protect those inter. ! este checked above.The Commission orders that all work shall be performed t in accordance with said conditions and with the Notice of Intent referenced above.To the extent that the fol- lowing conditions modify or differ from the plans,specifications or other proposals submitted with the Notice of Intent,the conditions shag control. General Conditions 1. Failure to comply with all conditions stated herein,and with all related statutes and other regulatory meas- ures,shall be deemed cause to revoke or modify this Order. 2. This Order does not grant arty property rights or any exclusive privileges;it does not authorize any injury to private property or invasion of private rights. 3. This Order does not relieve the permittee or arty other person of the necessity of complying with all other applicable federal,state or local statutes,ordinances, by-laws or regulations. 4. The work authorized hereunder shag be completed within three years from the date of this Order unless either of the following apply: (a) the work is a maintenance dredging project as provided for in the Act;or (b) the time for completion has been extended to a specified date more than three years, but less than five years,from the date of issuance and both that date and the special circumstances warranting the extended time period are set forth in this Order. S. This Order may be extended by the issuing authority for one or more periods of up to three years each upon application to the issuing authority at least 30 days prior to the expiration date of the Order. S. Any fill used in connection with this project shall be Leen fill,containing no trash,refuse,rubbish or de- bris, including but not limited to lumber, bricks,plaster,wire, lath, paper,cardboard, pipe, tires,ashes, refrigerators, motor vehicles or parts of any of the foregoing. 7. No work shall be undertaken until all administrative appeal periods from this Order have elapsed or, if such an appeal has been filed, until an proceedings before the Department have been completed. 8. No work shag be undertaken until the Final Order has been recorded in the Registry of Deeds or the land Court for the district in which the land is located,within the chain of title of the affected property.in the case of recorded land,the Final Order shag also be noted in the Registry's Grantor Index under the name of the owner of the land upon which the proposed work is to be done. in the case of registered land,the Final Order shall also be noted on the Land Court Certificate of Title of the owner of the land upon which the proposed work is to be done.The recording information shall be submitted to the Commission on the forth at the end of this Order prior to commencement of the work. 9. A sign shall be displayed at the site not less than two square feet or more than three square feet in size bearing the words,"Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering, File Number (A -l a( 10. Where the Department of Environmental Quality Engineering is requested to make a determination and to issue a Superseding Order, the Conservation Commission shag be a party to all agency proceedings and hearings before the Department 11. Upon completion of the work described herein,the applicant shall forthwith request in writing that a Certificate of Compliance be issued stating that the work has been satisfactorily Completed. 12.The work shall cpnforn to the following plans and special conditions: 5-2 96 Plans: Title Dated Signed and Stamped by: On File with: SESD - Danvers- James Ryan, P.E. Conservation Commission Beverly Relief Interceptor Attachments 8/6/85 Metcalf & Eddy "- accompany Notice Of Intent Special Conditlons(Use additional paper it necessary) 1. The Conservation Commission shall be notified within 2 weeks prior to start of construction. 2. Tolerance of pre and post surveys shall be + or - 6" in the shallow areas and + or - 1 ft. in the deeper water. The applicant's consulting engineer shall submit to the Conservation Commission the excerpt from the bid specification specifying the above tolerances. 3. A written report from the applicant's consulting engineer shall by submitted to the Conservation Commission certifying that the bottom topography complies within the specifications noted above. 4. All work shall be in accordance witn the Notice of intent, including supporting documentation and the above-referenced plans. i ................................................................._..................................................._............................_...................._ (L ve Sones BW* I 5.3A r � >Y ` '' 9w Issued By Salem Conservation Commission 1t Signature(s) c � t a This Order must be signed by a majority of the Conservation Commission. On this 14thday of(� Novem 19 85 before me personally appeared f1 —Ze -- /lrY , to me known to be the person described In and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she executed the same father free act and seri p-9 - �-k Notary Public My commission expires rhe aopwk nt,the owner.arty person agprbved by this Order,any owner of land abu the land upon which tte proposed work u to �. be done or any ten residents of the city or town in which such Ieq is looted ere hereby notified of their right to request tie Depetmett d Ern cinrAnfal OLwi ty Engineering to issue a superseding Order,prwidiirq the request is muds by certified mai or hew defnery to tho Departrnam widen ten days from the date of isrmno of this Order.A copy of the request shall at the same time be sem by certified mai or haw d!Avary to the Conservation Cmemsion and the aapaonL . Detschondotted line and submit to the Commission prior to eommaneamant of wort To owing AuVnonty Please be advised that the Order of Conditions for the pmiect e . Fie Number has been recorded at the Registry of and �. has baso noted In the cheat of title of the effected property,In accordance with General Conwitlort a oL 19— It p_If recorded lend. the Instrument number which Identifies this transection is. If registered Land,the document number which identifies this transaction is signaNfe Applicant 5-dA CL 1 Metcalf& Eddy ' 10 Harvard Mill Square J-002873-2204 Wakefield, Massachusetts J ' Mailing Address: PO. Box 4043 March 23, 1989 Woburn, MA 01888-4043 ' Mr. Raymond G. Bouchard Project Coordinator ' South Essex Sewerage District j P.O. Box 989 50 Fort Avenue Salem, MA 01970 Subject: Beverly Harbor Force Main, Contract 81-9A Evaluation of Most Recent Post-Construction tHarbor Bottom Survey Dear Mr. Bouchard: ' We have completed our evaluation of the most recent (January, 1989) post-construction bottom survey conducted in Beverly Harbor by Weston Geophysical including A comparison with pre-construction conditions as well as post-construction conditions surveyed last year during April and again in September. The purpose of this letter is to summarize our tfindings on the bottom restoration work. For your information we are enclosing the following information: ' o Copies of WESTON GEOPHYSICAL'S most recent "Bottom Contour Map" dated March, 1989, Figure 2, together with the Track Map, Figure 1 . ' o A comparison of changes between April 1988, September 1988 and January 1989 post-construction bottom surveys including a summary of any significant changes between pre and post ' construction harbor bottom conditions. Findings ' 1'. The shallow area on the Salem side of the harbor has been restored to near pre-construction bottom contours as a t result of the dredging/restoration activity conducted during November, 1988. The large high area between Sta. 22+50 and 25+00 which was previously between 1 and 3 feet ' above pre-construction 1986 elevations is now only about 1 foot high. . In addition, filter fabric material remaining from the construction activity and a few isolated piles of material have been removed from the area. At an extreme low tide, a few bottom irregularities are still visible but in time we would expect that they will diminish as a result of tidal currents. ' Telephone,(617)246-5200—FA%(617)245.6293—Telex 6817067(METED UW)op 6713781—Cable METEDD—Boston New York I Palo Alto I San BernardinoI Irwne.CA/Chicago Arlington Heights.IL I Columbus I Detroit I Houston I Atlanta I Branchburg,NJ I Meriden,CTI BunonSville.MD I Honolulu I San Juan ' Page 2 2 . Since the September, 1988 survey, we continue to witness natures restorative process: high areas are further diminished and low areas become filled as a result of the ' natural erosion process from ocean currents. a 3 . With a few small exceptions, most of the variances between pre and post construction bottom elevations are between 0 to 2 feet within the deepwater area. Some of the exceptions include isolated mounds or depressions noted on the pre-construction survey which now are flattened out ' and correspond to the adjacent bottom elevations. 4 . Latest bottom elevations in shallow water on the Beverly side match fairly closely with pre-construction ' elevations. This was expected because visual observations of the exposed bottom at .low tide (following the construction) have always looked smooth with no evidence ' of any previous trenching. 5. In comparing changes in bottom contours occuring between ' post-construction surveys #2 (September, 1988) and #3 (January, 1989 ) by the "overlay process" , we see widespread changes in contour configuration. This appears to be the result of the following: ' o The harbor bottom is undergoing continual change, particularly in the deeper water areas, obviously ' from the action of ocean currents . o The tolerance of the bottom survey, itself, is only + one foot. 1 These factors together complicate the bottom survey comparison process and must be considered in making ' recommendations for any bottom restoration work. Recommendations ' In view of the small variances between pre and post bottom surveys (generally 0 to 2 feet) , the irregular contours observed during the pre-construction bottom surveys, the ' degree of accuracy of the surveys themselves (1 foot + in deep water) , and the changing nature of the harbor bottom, it is our opinion that the harbor bottom including shallow areas on ' either 'side, is now restored to near pre-construction conditions (per November, 1986 survey) and no further restoration is necessary. 1 ' Page 3 J ' If you have any questions and would like to meet and discuss our findings and recommendations, please don't hesitate to call. Very truly yours, METCALF & EDDY, INC. ' James A. Ryan, Jr. Project Manager JAR:am ' Enclosure 1 1 1 1 1 Project SE 5 D REV, 1-1AL2 �toTT S �K- Acct. No. '-2'C3 4 Page .�1 of 2 - Subject COuT RACT �3L--9A Comptd. By 4• R 2 Date _./ �'2 9 Detail 50TT . SUt2VGY ckd. By Date COMPARISOt,.1 OF JAV3. 1989 POST - C.OIJSTRuC.T10N BOTTOM SURV6`? WITH ' ORIGtt3AL PRE - CO►JSTRUcrtOIJ BOTTOM SURVEY OF NOV. 11166 - 5q WC-S'MQ G60. R0TT01✓l 5JPVE` y { ANALSI C,ot-1t-1atJ'TS ITEM C >MPA210G PRC - GORAJp GST POST — CONtiNNTS 2CGhLotuG OF pRE _couST. 50TTOkN S'iRve- 1 iTtdre PoST — W COWST. APRIL 1988) 13OTrot•1 SVPVS%� S CRUSiRVGTLot.J RoTTUM Si u W J There is no survey data from mean high water (station 10 t?426 �posT s� Rvt 02TA oNty pgRriAtLY AVAtLARLE 1+25) to station 3+00. �1awc-VErZ � t=xpoSEu �4AR_ 3o?_ BeTT(i O3SeR,�e0 AT LoW WZ. There is no post construction survey TLOG APPEAF-S TO BE SKzoTt-1 AWO 1Sr4awS tJo data from station eVtl�e tJc G- of A TREWLtI 112 ReGULAR tT 3+00 to 4+00. D ' 3 There is a 50' x 100' area as much as 9' too low at TRIS OGP2ESSlotJ WAS 0856RVGb otJ station 4+70 and 60' west of the pipeline. The hole is 'PD5T- SURve`(S NOS I AWO. 2. QASGO tcu TN\Z well away from the pipe and in the channel area. 3RO POST- COWS, SUR-'JC`j TNI DEpRGSSto>,I HAS FURTt-kctt, ' a - DtK% W\-Cli AKQ0 ,S 0N LJ 2 _M 3 FT. S['taw 11Hb BorTot✓I W W Z Z tt , There is a 25' x 100' area at station 6+00 and 100' east 01JL•� A :SLt-Cn 4tT bEl' R E S S t o tJ W of the pipeline that is 2' low. This is in the area that CAW STILL BE S6G1� > was excavated as a result of the first break in the 30" 0 o line. w a 5,. There is a 60' diameter mound as much as 5' high at -rt-1t5 MovND 4A5 REEW ALPN oST ; C 00 pLS.TEL11 . U station 6+50 and 75' east of the pipeline. This is m probably a spoil pile left from the repair to the 30" j DtsPtRSE1] AtJO lS tJD latJC,G12 DISCG1tNARt.4; line. The mound is low enough (-20)' to not be a hazard the navigation. (o There is a 30' diameter arca 3' high at station 6+60 and BASeb ovi THC -IAA- 1185 SvRVE`� TyLS 1,4L6W A?,GA over the pipeline. This area is at the bottom of the I south slope of the channel. It was probably formed when 4-AAS GouTIWUED To Dt►`%ttJLSk — Ali 1S Now owLy ' the side cast cover material ran down the slope during ASoUT t Foor HvCaNER T4AY4 t98b 4oT7otn the backfill operation. At elevation -22 the mound is i not a hazard to navigation. ] There is a 50' diameter 4' low area at station 7+25 about) A SLtGNT 9Cp12E55t9t.1 5 STILI_ LV1DEQT Awn iT 25' east of the pipeline. This is the area in which the I Ap PEAKS To HAVI 'r +WP7eb -ro -rHC- WtST SIIJ ce slope of the channel had to be over excavated because of --r[-+t SEpT• 19et3 SuRVe {, -THEoEP2CSSto J 1S Now limitations on the pipe joint angularity. Even with the reduction in bottom elevation there is adequate cover AaouT °L FELT LOwrc-tz THAW 19.86 RoTT. _cow PlTto1.1S over the pipeline. ' a There is a 100' diameter area 3' low at station 8+25 and TNt5 AREA Is SL GRT -Y (A3O�-T °� �T� TKAQ 60' east of the pipeline. This material was removed Lg86 BoTTot.A . 140WeV612 � 1J t986 THE WAS A ' during the backfilling operation. 1.3I 9 0V,) I; t a( E 07- TD 8 E OISP��SE1� � t=�oDEU E `t tJ .OTVRA�. OCl:,9tJ GU21:1?.tJTS Project 65q BEV, KAR. OTT. SjXv. Acct.No 2 O Page 2 of �- ' Subject CO WTRC ACT at-9A omptd. By � � �-'� Date Detail R�TT . S U 12�JE`{ AW Ale • —?c— H• Clod. By Date COMPARISOW OF JA►J . 1984 POST C0WSTRUCTI0N BOTTOM SURVE-%{ WIT4 OR.IG W AL PRE - COA1ST?,UC.'TV0 J BOT TOM SURVE`K OF �3OV. IWO - E Y WCSTO>J C7e0. (7"E M B0TTON1 5OR.VE`{ A1uAI_`fSA 5 CO"MENTS CGpMt-)CWTS REGARr, 10G COKPAR1SOQ OF PRCC, - OtJST?, . h}p OOMpAkVWG PPC- COQSTf<. AtJO IST POST- aOTTOt-1 SURJE%� WITH THE JAO� 1,989 (3RD) FaS'T - ColtST: (APRIL t986 ) 80TTOM C,0057ROCTtOeJ 30TTONA SuP,\)V{ a a u W J m 9, There is a 30' x 110' area running along thepipeline ate TN1S NAouWUGo AREA 1-+AS Fu RT14F_- 41MItJlS1-1 c. I) siuCE 'a station 8+75 that is 3' higher than the original bottom. I THC- SG?T. 1,Ct'3t3 R0TTOM1 5� RvCr` _ A>J0 1S FAiZL,4 W This appears to be an area into which too much backf illCLo S G TO r 4E 1'RLE- co kJ S T R v cTL-o 1 l l9 8 rO C_01,J-roupas was placed. At an elevation of -8, outside the channel„ F the resulting high area should not be a hazard to navigation. ' Ip- At station 13+75 and 10' east of the nominal pipe TH 15 LOW AR.6 A NAS F I VLSI) 1 1J , S I W LE Tk E SEPT, T• location there is a 20' diameter 4' deep low area. kC,ea f;OTaM SotpvC­{ - AUD LDQr-09t-1S 7.0 THC PRE - This location is close enough to the pipeline that therei C0W STX2. J LT101J 19186 f301--rorj =IUTOV1_.S W may not be adequate cover over the pipe. Z 11, There is a 70' diameter area 3' to 4' low, at station TRIS AREA `VR-vr-1,1 10 7H6 1,9.86 P1zE - coNSiR.QcfiwU 0 14+25 and 50' east of the pipeline. In this location the SUP-QG11 SWowGO A5 A F41JV1P . SN ALL posT - CDNSrRVLT 10J °m original bottom had a hump. This area is now basically i 5JrwE-A_S TN5 _AREA L5 WOW .-FLAT - ANG c,oUFOILVts . To as flat at elevation -14. TWL S�JR(t 0%dWU1-oJG 190-f100 DEPTHS J l2: There is a 175' wide by 125' long area from station 16+751 THIS Low AizcA Gor1T11JU55 To FbLL 1,N AND W to 18+00 that is variably low by 2' to 3' . In this area .! �pP2oA�t \ TRC- pCte_ CANSTPQC_rLQVJ tg86 RoTTovt c7z some rock was removed from the site. Also the material over the rock was very soft and tended to dissipate when ! Tt4E.12C ARE . A FEIN 1)EpRE55101J 1 t4owrvEV-, -WWlctd ARE moved, The soundings indicate that the pipe does have f3ETWEGU 1 AuD Z Fee-r BELow 1,9$ 6 C_0lrrovR5 . the required minimum cover. 13- There is a 30' diameter area up to 7' deep at station -rIi 1,S SMALL V EP RES S 1Dnl IS NQS TLY C 1 LLE U 14 - ExLapT 18+90 and 60' east of the pipeline. FAR A SMALL LO 'FT QlAt,1GT69, LOW AREA AQovT 5 FT. ' j LOWL-R -fAAQ tg96 (3Q_MQt-1 , TWtS DEP RES510Q tS ExpEC-TSD FILL Z1dE Sv�1LovNO1wJC� TO Po GRAPH `( i4- There is a large area uniformly 1' high from station i TO IQ T'O MATLW 19+00 to 22+50 and 175' wide. In this area Great Lakes TF3 t5 ARCA P R ETT MU Lid C O r t FORM f To 1015 6 a o T-To?-J dug a wide trench to provide flotation for the dredge. 70? OGRAPH { tx(-laPT F-012 A FGW ISOLATED ARaAS wNt.c.11 Aar ABOVT ( FT. 1ItGN, (S There is a large area that is variably 1' to 3' .high from '! DJ1211JG NOQr 1943 ) 'T1d15 AP-EA WAS gRGDGF..iT To RaMo\/t= station 22+50 to 25+00 and 200' wide. There is alsoN LA�r c 1-tvGld AREA l S,OT�G tIZR6CouLAfL Nt6H spoTs� ANo filter fabric partially buried in this area. In this SQI,vG 7-1L7ti¢. FABRt< MATETzjAt_ LC- PT G-1 THS Cou-rRAC10VC area Great Lakes dug a wide trench to provide flotation (3ASC-. D ON THC- LASTEST ( .lAL., 1q.89) 130Tiurl SQR �E`{ , THIS l for the dredge. AREA t4AS Ret-tJ ALZSR F u To Acce p-rAgt,G con 01-r10l,1S o AgouT FT 141.GH ee7wec- J STA 22tS0 Atib STA °LStioo vap_-{ cL.Ds c T-o 1986 coN7ov-v_s 1U a`Ac1-i AREA S TvlEkaW sTA 2Sioo — Z.6 -iOo Im`- Metcalf & Eddy 10 Harvard Mill Square Wakefield. Massachusetts J-002876-2203 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 4043 Woburn. MA 018884043 1 1 ' October 24, 1988 ' Mr. Raymond G. Bouchard Project Coordinator South Essex Sewerage District ' P.O. Box 989 50 Fort Avenue Salem, MA 01970 ' Subject: Beverly Harbor Force Main, Contract 81-9A Evaluation of Most Recent Post-Construction Harbor Bottom Survey ' Dear Mr. Bouchard-. ' We have completed our evaluation of the most recent (Sept. 1988) post-construction bottom survey conducted in Beverly Harbor by Weston Geophysical including a comparison with pre-construction conditions as well as post-construction conditions surveyed ' earlier, this year in April. The purpose of this letter is to summarize our findings and to present our recommendations concerning further harbor bottom .restoration work to be done by ' the contractor. For your information we are enclosing the following information: ' o Copies of WESTON GEOPHYSICAL'S most recent "Bottom Contour Map" dated September 1988, Figure 2. ' o A reduced version of this map on which significant high and low areas have been delineated. o A comparison of changes between April 1988 and September 1988 post-construction bottom surveys including a summary of any significant changes between pre and post construction harbor bottom conditions . ' Major Findings 1. Since the April 1988 survey, high areas have diminished ' and low areas have filled in to a significant degree as a result of the natural erosion process from ocean currents. ' 2 . With a few small exceptions, most of the variances between pre and post construction bottom elevations are between 0 to 2 feet within the deepwater area. Some of the texceptions include isolated mounds or depressions noted on Telepnone(617)2465200-Telex 6817067(METED UW) =6713781-1-able METEDD—Boston ,,mrago A.ungtbn ligins !L Cui. cus De.rot Houston:dila.ta3,,,,rncr:rg,NJ h!e•icen CT cur,.le tp - .1 ' Page 2 ' the pre-construction survey which now are flattened out and correspond to the adjacent bottom elevations. 3 . The findings of item #2 before are consistent with similar ' conditions observed from bottom surveys conducted in Salem Harbor between 1980 and 1.986. 4 . While no elevations could be obtained at the shallow portion on the Beverly side, the exposed bottom observed at low tide on October 20, 1988 along the new force main is smooth with no evidence of any previous trenching work. 5 . At the shallow portion on the Salem side, however, bottom irregularities can be easily observed at low tidal ' conditions between about Station 22+50 to Sta. 24+00% Several high areas of between 1 and 2 feet can be seen over and westerly of the 42" pipeline in the vicinity of Station 24+00 . 6 . Any areas (noted in the April 1988 post-construction survey) where there was possibly insufficient cover over ' the 42" pipeline have filled in. Consequently there are no spots where there is insufficient cover of the new force main. ' Recommendations ' 1. In view of the small variances between pre and post bottom surveys (generally 1 to 2 feet) , the irregular contours observed during the pre-construction bottom surveys, the degree of accuracy of the surveys themselves ( 1 foot +) , ' the changing nature of the harbor bottom, and the fact that a drag bar cannot be used to smooth out the bottom, we recommend that no further restoration of the harbor ' bottom be conducted in the deep water portions. 2 . The shallow area of the harbor bottom on the Beverly side shows no evidence of the recent pipeline dredging and backfilling operation, and we recommend therefore that no restoration work is needed. ' 3 . The shallow area on the Salem side still needs to be restored to near pre-construction conditions. As pointed out in our August 4, 1988 evaluation of bottom conditions, ' some of the filter fabric material is still partially buried in the area of the irregular bottom condition (Sta. 22+50 to Sta. 25+00+) . This area should be restored by the contractor. i 1 ' Page 3 4 . Because the shallow area on the Salem side is visable at ' low tide, further post-construction survey is unwarranted. If you have any questions and would like to meet and discuss our ' findings and recommendations, please don 't hesitate to call . Very truly yours, ' METCALF & EDDY, INC. YYv ames A. Ryan, Jr. Project Manager ' JAR:am Enclosure 1 1 1 1 1 ; Project SC-50 Acct.No 2 �3 Page 2 of 2 Subject CO N T RA C-T `�i i - A Comptd. By , ' R4 2Date 1 O Detail SQTTJ t-� SV1Z.J G'. A"AIS Ckd. BY Date - - COM PAR,% SOh1 OF APRIL 1988 AND. ' SC-Pr. 1988 POST - C.OPISTRUCT1o1iij 130TTO � SuRvLi?S or- W66TDI.1 G1E0 ?%-IYStCAL — SNE1ET 2 17C- W, 3077-OM 5012vE\t CUMMGiJTS of No COMPARING PIPC-- c-OWSTR AWD.°,. 1ST ?PST, CuOIQS ',R SEPT . 1G13 `3 (2.ND ) ' �AI' Ril 1988 BoT"rOt1 SU Pa5T - C_0QST"ILaJc:TI:�ia - $o -T-Uh 5UV, V $ x 0 There is a 30 ' x 110' , area running along the pipeline, at TNiS ' MoLtIJDEn AttcA IS =' K-oSTI, } DlFnirJiS Fu3 AWL^ u station 8+75 that is 3' higher than the original 'bottom. t This -appears to be an area into which too 'much backfill 1,1oW its 13eT-w6G1,J _ Ar,+D 2 FT /sSoVE ' ? 2c -earJSTla4'sttarJ u was placed. At an elevation of -8, outside the _channek, C-Ou IWIT1O r.5 g the resulting high area should not be a hazard to navigation. W ' � 10_ At station 13+75 and 10' -east of the nominal pipe -114 S SMALL DaPRaSS'1oVJ NA5 NkoSTLy FILLrt) IN location there is a 20' diameter 4' deep low area. ' This location is close enough to the" pipeline that there S I WCV 'r1i+ APP-IL . LV6S SuR.V GVJ TN S L)—9 R,aSSt o4-1 may not be adequate cover over the pipe. fTOW V.ARk,aS 36rVNCCN ` JIND 2 FT • ' a 11. There, is a 70,' diameter area 3' to 4' low at .station ' H 1,5 hRuA, Sya•rvaU As A }-iiJ M P uJ -rks NRt - W IJsT2uctiO r l W 14+25 and 50' east of the pipeline. In this location the su (ZVe 1 TEtiS AREA 1N RmTV1 pos Z original bottom had a hump. This area 'is now basically T eo r� £T>zuc�rroi SuiZ��cs 1 S u W flat at elevation '-14. Now r-LAT' AV40 CotJ0ZORMS To S�RRour.r01W , i3oTro p�PTyS• 0 12. There is a 175' wide by 125' long area from station 16+75_ _-__ , w --- -- TbIlS iORaA -NAS-- . r iLLE 1) 1!1 - 51WG� -TVd -'A-P,RiLi: 1c1a8, 1 to 18+00' that- re variably low by 2' ' 3' . he this area 5 kvie -A Q0 ISR-c- T-r1J MUGA CQQP0?Lr•1S 1-6 PY.e- Ca N`; T-PQcTQQ 4 n some rock was removed from -the site: ` Also the material I i �{ J - CAWOITLoW5 e-,4CCPT V=-aR ' A FSW iSot:AT'l_.Di DC- PRESS1,Q05 over the ..rock was-.very soft and tended to dissipate- when i U moved. The soundings indicate that the pipe, does have : WI.41ci-1 AV4r. ABouT 2 f the required minimum cover. ' W NYDSTL`{ rFLLC-n - i• J . _ - -1 r�1-A-�- DapRcss IorJ ,s kQ _ `3 There- is a 30' diameter area up to 7" deep at station S 18+90 and 60' east of the pipeline. hnrb i 5 Now Af3ovT 1 Ta 2 FT, SELOW PP_;(E - c0w Uc.710I.1 C•OWDITtONS, 14. There is a large area uniformly 1 ' .high from station "AVJGrD StWC.L T APRil. Vlptti ' 19+00.. to 22+50 and 175 ' wide. In this area Great ,Lakes TA. 19 +-So AWn 2.a +SO± T14 dug a wide trench to provide flotation f.or the dredge. : kP.-A iS STILL. ARo�T i FT Too "ICa14, NovvEVILla. geiwmeQ ' _r S*rA 21 +-oo Awn 2.2+-5o t -rkls AVt1=A 4S NOW ARovT I FT L oW. 15 There is a large areathatis variably L' ,to_ 3' high from -76+ER,C- I5 WaSu-J 1)NTA AVA1LAauF I1,J 7H is AREA station 22+50 to 25+00 and 200' wide There is also > 2.oM TWc Sc(?T'% Igtit3 svw {, t4owc-v�tz . FRort ctisand/�Tlopus ' 'filter fabric part-ially buried in this area. In this area Great Lakes dug a wide 'trench to' provide flotation AT LaW ?ih� oN ocT- 2.oI iq 8 ? TycR.� ARc SFVERJ,L 111L { for the dredge. /»•EAS Ov:?- AND WEST6aL{ OF moi= g7 " FuR.c.6 MAW , IW_ ,. ' 71-0S V I C I N I T-j O F S7%A 4-4+-a o � t Project SEs acct. No. 22 O 3 page of 2 Subject (!,0"TRAC-T 81 9A Comptd By Date lo�2a�8� ' Detail '�OTTD NI SVVE'"{, AVAt- S Ck d. By Date COMPAR%SOW OF Amt. 10iBS AWD SEPT ►q88 Pos'r-. c.00sTRuc.Tvo1.J C3oTToM SuRVG-`tS of 6G VbRLy RAR Ro6Z -- 3, 1 WCgT0W e ig0?tA e:Al — ,n 30TToW 5u[LvC-`), Ah1AU-(SI$ '` GO'NWtGUT:S' i :' f. OM.MAN .IQTS GALR0t1,3G Cc7MPR�'+ ISOh} OF a 1 TE NOM Gor�pAr2iuG P12E- LptVSTR• AT >5,. I sT.: pos,T : cx�.u:sroZ /a71t1L I� ( I sT� , Awo SG-FT Iq t3 3 C2uD� 'g CAPP. IL 10.9 8) la0TSbM, SvF2v.C-Y ,.. , ., ; , -. pOST COtJ5Ti2uCTl�h1 SOTTotJ Sul2V�� 0 u WI ;There is no survey data from mean. ` DATA,high... . No. S�IRVG`>r A AVAIL,�L',Ll: t✓;2oM SIiC'•T `Id � SvTZyE `{. '� 1+25)' to station 3+00. water. (station �K�oStSp kkAtZeOtt ROTTDn� ORSERVEn AT Low TI DL 'n 2. There is no post construction survey. data from station; W 13+00 to 4+00. Ap PGATZS To SE Sr✓1oo7•H . AN b S Hows ko' �cVI0 El•.tc,C WC OF A TR �)'JC.N IRR �GLnARtry OCT ILO 1985 o.QssRvATtohl ' 3 ..There is a 501 . x 100' - area as. much as 9' too low at TNis , ROLE Ca STA 4+ 10-wssT 14AS ri"(zu 1vi SLCo'L+1F4cnuTL°� ( station 4+70 and 60' west of the pipeline. The hole is SIWLL AV R-kt. LcW,3 , LOW 'AReA IS NOW RGTWHEU , 4 To FT well away from the pipe, and in .the channel area. _ _ ' R1L Cotsd Svr-\(G {N --_.-- ,�-- _-_ . __ . _ s . c Desp 12•Arl{ems T'kigt,.1 faeouT � FT. L>,J T1g6 kp _ There is a Z5' x 100 is 2 low. This is in the 'area that 4� ? RG- SSto W 4; ' area at station 6+00 and 100' east - 0 of the pipeline that Tk is = Ali l+A511 S I W c.E r-t LLE t-; 17V A+_�rl t s ' W was excavated as a result of the first break in the 30" NoT p.l: c6R t.� A Q LS >: line. 0 o - W 6 Jr, ! There is a 60' diameter mound as much as 5' high at station 6+50 and 75' east of the pipeline. This i§ T1115 NrovrlO F{AS ac-_160pksptcl;tEu ANb I PtoW ' 'probably a spoil pile left from the repair to the 30" OWL-f aSTNC-GQ Au U 2 rT. A%OV�E U p P PRE - wwsr• c.owpilio ,IS w line. The mound is low enough (-20) to not be a hazard the navigation. ' G There is a 30' diameter area 3' high at station 6+60 and over the pipeline. This area is at the bottom of the TNtS M9vuu IS. 5LyGHTL ? D 1 M' rJl s a Aw b + 5 njow south slope of the channel . It was probably formed. when Ata O uT 2 1=7, �4 LG Lt, ' the side cast cover material ran down the slope during the backfill operation- At elevation -22 the mound is not a hazard to navigation. ' ] There is a 50' diameter 4' low area at station 7+25 about 25' east of the- pipeline. This is the area in which the ARa,q I-fAS , r iLLv,--O 1W SorAIZWK AT- , 51 vJL APR-"_ 19 �i8 ' slope of the .channel had to be over excavated because of AwD I5; RraoJ Aro J7 2 'TC- Fr Lowe)z ' HAt ,1 - limitations on the pipe .joint angularity. Even with the PRE - cc 1,.+5 T rc.6;LTtO Q co vL t T=ONS reduction in bottom elevation there is adequate cover over the pipeline. ' a There is a 100' diameter area 3' low at station 8+25 and _TI-M ARG--:, ,15 ST!'cL vU=Te.uc' tor ) 60 ' east of the pipeline. This material -was removed, -, . ,.. Cotioi T,.o 15 _;t. 1 r' � G ,� - D during the backfilling operation. w4 1 �� _ 1 1 uG c ARaA 'SePe 1=l3 �� tiLwS 5 ria X114 " r�TTo � CO:J'-o:JS WITH Tb•-�e ,�.+ _ �;>�; IJOVJ G0 TJ Ing o Metcalf& Eddy J-002873-2204 "" 10 Harvard Mill Square Wakefield, Massachusetts Box May 8, 1989A °) Gr '" of°( pa �Ta Wobu MailinOn AMA 01888ddress: P.00434043 itr J.. u Salem Conservation Commission c/o Salem City Hall Washington Street Salem, MA 01970 Subject: Order of Conditions, DEQE File No. 64-121 South Essex Sewerage District Danvers-Beverly Relief Interceptor Beverly Harbor Crossing - Contract 81-9A Dear Members: In accordance with the subject "Order of Conditions" dated November 14 , 1985 and as modified on January 4 , 1989 (e.g. , General Condition No. 11 and Special Condition No. 2 ) this is to advise that the project was completed and the work performed satisfactorily and essentially in accordance with both the "Order of Conditions" and contract documents . Enclosed for your review is a copy of a report to the South Essex Sewerage District dated March 23, 1989 on the restoration of Beverly Harbor bottom in the vicinity of the pipeline construction. At this time we are also requesting, on behalf of the applicant, that the Commission issue a "Certificate of Compliance" for the project following their review of the enclosed material . A copy of the subject "Order of Conditions" together with the modified "Order of Conditions" is enclosed to facilitate your review of our request . Very truly yours, )*T)AaJ 61 lid" James A. Ryan, Jr . Project Manager JAR:am Enclosure cc: DEQE, Wetlands Division, Woburn, MA R. Bouchard, SESD Project Coordinator C . Pallazola, Modern Continental M. Minoque, LBC ( for Great Lakes ) w/attach. Telephone(617)246-5200—FAX(617) 245-6293—Telex 6817067 (METED UW)OR 6713781—Cable METEDD—Boston New York/Palo Alto/San Bernaroino/Irvine,CAI Chicago/Arlington Heights,IL/Columbus/Detroit/Houston/Atlanta/Branchburg,NJ/Meriden,CT/Bunonsville,MD I Honolulu I San Juan i;, .. • .,,•.,... .. • �,; . i r.ii uia.v uirrii�/� .��i•i ilii• 935-2160 S SFp2 1985 � DATE : August 29, 1985 SALEM PLAIVNIiVG DEPT. I TOWN: SALEM ------------ ASSIGNED FILE NO: 64-121 The Division of Wetlands is in receipt of an application filed under M.G.L. Chapter 131 , Section 40, the application is in the name of APPLICANT: DIST. OWNER OF LAND: CITY OF SALEM PARK DEPT. 989 9 NORTH STREET SALEM MA 01970 SALEM, MA 01970 PROJECT LOCATION: BEVERLY HARBOR, SALEM CORPORATE BOUNDARY LOT: N/A PROJECT REVIEW { ) The application is incomplete. No File Number will be assigned until material checked below is submitted to this Office: ( ) Notice of Intent and Environmental ( ) Plans Data Form ( ) Project requires the filing of• a ( ) Locus Form 3 (Notice of Intent) rather than Form 4 (Abbreviated Notice of Intent) WATERWAYS REVIEW ' ( ) Project may require a Chapter 91 Licel - project has been referred to Waterways, ( A Project does not require a Chapter 91 License. ISSUANCE A OF FILE NUMBER INDICATES ONLY COMPLETENESS OF FILING SUMMIT TED$ NOT APPROVAL OF THE APPLICATION, Very truly yours , William A. Krol , p,E, MM/gg Deputy Regional Environmental Engineer [C ! Cnnq,•rvatton Cnmmi •.', inn , � i Fd DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ENGINEERING DIVISION OF WETLANDS AND WATERWAYS REGULATION F2EC U OTICE OF WATERWAYS LICENSE APPLICATION HP 2 4 1985 Pursuant to M.G.L. Ch 91 SALEM PLAPJNIfdG DEPT. _ YOUR FILE APPLICATION NO. 85W-169 Notice Is hereby given of the application of The South Essex Sewerage District of the City/ Tb" of Beverly-Salem for a license to construct and maintain a flexible point force main at Beverly Pump Station and City of Salem Beverly - Salem in and over the waters of Beverly Harbor The :proposed use of this fill/structure is to pzmat$� convey watewater from SESD Beverly Pump Station to an existing force main in Salem to the SESD wastewater treatment plant in Salem. The Department will consider all comments submitted within 30 days in deciding whether to grant a license pursuant to G.L. Ch. 91. Written comments should be addressed to: DEPARTMENT of ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ENGINEERING Division of Wetlands and Waterways Regulation One Winter Street, Boston, Ma. 02108 Inquiry may be made by phone (619 292-5695) .or letter 45 days after this Notice has been published in the newspaper. Your file number should be in said publication and used for requested information. NOTICE TO APPLICANT/AGENT Above is the completed "Notice of Waterways License Application Form" for your proposed activity.It is 'your responsibility to have this notice published, at your expense, in a newspaper having a circulation in the area affected by the license. A copy of •this notice, as printed in the newspaper, along with the name 'of the newspaper and the date of the publication shall be forewarded to the Department. The Department cannot issue any license until at least forty-five (45) days following publication of this notice. Your file number is located at the top right hand corner of this form and is important to you or your agent. THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS (Tidal Waters) TO THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ENGINEERING: The Petition of The South Essex Sewerage District municipality Beverly/Salem , in the County of Essex - South and Commonwealth aforesaid, showeth: That said Petitioner desires to Construct 2600-ft. of 42 inch diameter flexible (describe project) joint force main in and over the tidewaters of Beverly Harbor located at See attached location plan in the Beverly/Salem in the (street address) © town) county of Essex-South and Commonwealth aforesaid; that the tidewater land above low water mark which would be covered or occupied by said structure, is SESD - Beverly Pump Station 50 Fort Ave. , P.O. Box 989 owned by and the City of Salem of Salem, MA 01970 and uplands shoreword thereof is owned by The Cities of Beverly and Salem of (address) PROJECT INFORMATION 1. The specific use of the proposed structure/fill is Convey wastewater from the SFSD Beverly Pump Station across Beverly Harbor to an existing force main in Salem and then on to the SESD wastewater treatment plant in Salem. 2. Is the use of the project water dependent? Yes No X Explain: 8 3. If not water dependent or if located in Commonwealth tidelands, i.e., below extreme low water, does the project serve a public purpose? Yes No Explain: Relief and replacement of existing interceptor for the abatement of combined sewer overflows in Danvers and Beverly. Wherefore said Petitioner certifies under the pains and penalties of perjury that the information provided above and on the accompanying plans is true and complete to the best of his knowledge and asks that a license be granted to The South Essex Sewerage District to build and maintain said structure, in accordance with said plans, subject to the Provisions of the ninety-first chapter of the General Laws, and of all laws which are or may be in force applicable thereto. Date: September 10, 1985 Q.� ) Authorized on behalf of South Essex Signature: a ,` ) Sewerage District. See attached 1/26/83 letter Address: c/o Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. ) 30 Harvard Mill Square Wakefield. MA _ P.O. Box 4043 Woburn, MA 01888-4043 Optional In matters concerning this application please contact: Representative: James A. Ryan Jr. , or Barry Hampson Address: Metcalf & Eddy. Inc. Wakefield, MA 01880 Telephone No. : 246-5200 C 9 � �4� P9M LEGEND NOTES + • • —• • MEAN HIGH WATER Ao 1. ALL ELEVATIONS REFER TO MEAN LOW WATER DATUM, E ER Y Ali R WHICH IS 4.46 FEET BELOW • • • • • • • • MEAN LOW WATER USC 11163 MEAN SEA LEVEL �sm-I BORING- LOCATION .DATUM. $ c CUS AND NUMBER 2. GRID COORDINATES REFER TO 7 4f qSALEKM C-II MASS.STATE GRID SYSTEM•ANYONDNUMBER �P 2000 0 2000 SCALE Ol FEET LOCATION PLAN ? FROM U.S.O.S.SALEM,MA.QUAD. K 25' MIN. DISTANCE W !� �> FROM TOE OF SLOPE e00 BUOY ? TO 4L OF FORCE MAIN l a N-1 co BEVERLY BEVERLY HARBOR a PUMP STATION F y� 1 W BPS-2 3O BEACH ? N O:F- MEAN ON MEAN LOW IV Q: 4 WATER WATER APPROX114ATE LOCATION OF W > S 34°-5 =32" EXIST,30'C.I. FORCE MAIN W J v�V O' '• - 6 .Oo LICENSE NO. 698 v► +D at �-21�14"E1 14.00 W BH-1BN- • 10*00 W �'J ?00 BH-IA Buor BH-2 -3 Z W �P 2 C-11 J mCLEAR DOCK E. S43°-30'-00"E -BLIMITS OIF• 42" FORCE MAIf� v CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT . DREDGED CHANNEL Q TOE OF SLOPE OF JETTY 31 YACHT CLUB FLOAT PLAN LL 100 0 100 200 300 SCALE IN FEET PURPOSE: RELIEF AND REPLACEMENT OF `Stl OF, - EXISTING FORCE MAIN. p'r JAMES , PROPERTY OWNERS . V RYAN 11N OWILLIAM R. AND DORIS GREERSinl I d ,A No.24343 Q 1 132 WATER STREET, BEVERLY, MA. 8 q�0 1C1 OJUBILEE YACHT CLUB . FFSS�ONAL ENG` 2 129 WATER STREET, BEVERLY, MA. O3 CITY OF BEVERLY, BEVERLY, MA. O4 SOUTH ESSEX SEWERAGE DISTRICT JJrC�^� GYa. I/ REO.FBF.GROW., MASS.Na44943 DATE METCA►F B EDDY, INC,., ENGINEERS , PLAN ACCOMPANYING PETITION OF SOUTH ESSEX SEWERAGE DISTRICT SALEM, MASS. . TO CONSTRUCT AND MAINTAIN A I 42" FORCE MAIN UNDER AND ACROSS BEVERLY HARBOR