The URL can be used to link to this page

15 ROBINSON RD/SWAMPSCOTT ROAD - CONSERVATION COMMISSION o '_ 15 ` �Zob�nsodl 2d swa�scotf Rd r I - ,l 32 C6,nrt� S J-_J r r a tow r7-,,� IW 9M-�/S- &SOo 4 V) iao Swa»gps0 lyi�i Gvl� 7}•8 • bZS • fds 6 Alt]a/Car"n Mcnitfle, P.oNf fy. ow•�) r1410 fw-wVscc.# ;q RrnT �ir1.e�}�v}��Ason �8/•S93 GH n'sti$• IS 46p„2r! •.Po87. ho'Kl?$� 9 3/08 cdl Salem l�/C�u4a.r.... m =WWI A pWPrml 4iir.v•a4 t3 ! i ! 1 i Salem Conservation C©mnilee(on 120 Washington Shei,$rd FI Salem,MA 01970 I 855 -6585 e,1MD.a` Cdoar�0.W C VQXI 2.UV�• SILT I Commonwealth of Massachusetts RECL IVE® Executive Office of Energy &Environmental Affairs JUN 0 12015 ILDepartment of Environmental Pry«-°GWi%Qa"MENT Northeast Regional Office•2058 Lowell Street, Wilmington MA 01887.978.694-3200 Charles D.Baker Matthew A.Beaton Governor Secretary Karyn E.Polito - Martin Suuberg Lieutenant Governor Commissioner May 28, 2015 Mr. Michael Ferris RE: WETLANDS/SALEM A&H Auto Exchange, Inc. ACOP-NE-05-9015-2467AMENDI 15 Robinson Road 15 Robinson Road Salem, MA 01970 Dear Mr. Ferris: Full compliance with the Consent Order Amendment that you signed on January 21, 2008, to construct a stormwater management system on the site has not been met. MassDEP understands that there were problems beyond your control that delayed implementation but it is time now for implementation to proceed. 1 have spoken with Bruce Poole about submitting a proposal to amend the ACOP that would support design changes to the stormwater system and change deadlines. The amendment proposal should be submitted no later than June 30, 2015. Please be aware that there may be penalties if compliance is not completed. If there are problems with achieving compliance,please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions or concerns. I may be reached at 978-694-3372. Sincerely, Gary Bogue Environmental Analyst Wetlands Program cc: Salem Conservation Commission, 93 Washington Street, Salem, MA 01970 Mr. Bruce Poole, SP Engineering, Inc., PO Box 848, Salem,MA 01970 i This Information is available in alternate format Call Michelle Waters-Ekanem,Diversity Director,at 617-292-5751.TTY#MassRelay service 1-600-439-2370 MassDEP Website:w .mass.gov/dep Pnnted on Recycled Paper BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES PLAN A&II AUTO EXCHANGE INC. 15 ROBINSON ROAD SALEM, MA 01970 PREPARED FOR: MICHAEL FERRIS A&R AUTO EXCHANGE INC. 15 ROBINSON ROAD SALEM, MA 01970 PREPARED BY: BRUCE M. POOLE SP ENGINEERING, INC 45 CONGRESS STREET SALEM, MA 01970 .TUNE 2006 }. INTRODUCTION This Best Management Practices Plan(BMPP) has been prepared for A&H Auto Exchange Inc., 15 Robinson Road, Salem, MA in order to address the handling and storage of waste oil and/or hazardous wastes generated by car stripping and car crushing activities,the response to and/or clean-up of releases and spills of vehicle fluids and long term mitigation measures to prevent and control releases. The procedures contained herein represent the best available technology contained in guidance documents and conform to the Chapter 21 Regulations, Mass State Fire Code and State Wetlands Protection Act. The plan incorporates three regulatory authorities to result in an operation that minimizes the risk to human health and releases to the environment. The plan has three basic sections that are described in greater detail in the document and summarized below: Waste Handiing I. The handling of vehicles to be used for parts or recycled for steel involves procedures for; waste fluid transfer(gas, oil), battery, tire and catalytic converter removal, recovery of air bags, and mercury switches, Freon capture as well as the consolidation of antifreeze, and window washer fluid for reuse. The activities related to fluid handling and storage must occur on impervious surfaces. All fluids must be drained before vehicle crushing_ Techniques for compliantly and safely handling these waste streams are detailed in instruction sheets written in English and Spanish that can be found in the appendix. Spill Prevention 2. The second part of the plan involves the proper and secure containment of the liquid and solid waste streams in suitable containers and tanks. All waste fluid vessels (pails, drums, totes and tanks) shall be closed except when waste is being added or removed. The containers are labeled with the identifying information(i.e. waste oil, gasoline, antifreeze, etc.), safety concerns (i.e. toxic, flammable, corrosive) name of the generator, generator ID# and accumulation start date. Manifests for transport and disposal of oil and hazardous waste streams must be maintained on file at the office at all times. MSDS sheets on the chemicals recovered and/or recycled must be on file for the workers at all times. In accordance with the Fire Prevention Department regulations 527 CMR 1-50.0 revised 7/18/2003,the gasoline and waste oil tanks are vented and held in a spill containment tank. In addition the gas tank is securely fenced and gasoline.must be dispensed into only approved NIOSH portable gasoline vessels. To prepare for Spill Prevention Control a storage area is set up at the car stripping area and in the garage. In these areas containers, fire extinguishers, oil absorbant pads, oil booms, oil absorbant media, safety glasses, gloves and protective clothing are kept on hand to deal with minor spills, drippage and routine clean-up. In addition, a primary barrier of 40 mil HDPE, asphalt and steel plate is placed under the stripping rack, the gas tank storage and the car crusher to provide a smooth surface to capture fugitive oils and allow easy clean-up with petroleum absorbant materials. The entire area where fluid storage, car stripping, crushing, flat storage and dismantling is conducted is bermed and lined with 40 mil HDPE to isolate and contain drippage and runoff. Stormwater Management 3. The third component on the plan is the control of runoff and stormwater management. The property is situated on ledge with 2-4' of soil overburden and the soils are relatively impermeable. As there is a 50' topographic gradient across the property, current runoff flows rapidly to the intermittent stream on the south property line or to Swampscott Road. The Site Locus can be seen in Figure One. The purpose of this plan is to detain and treat stormwater flows. Runoff from the car storage areas is likely to contain detectable petroleum residues and therefore some level of detention and runoff treatment is desirable. The primary requirement is that all fluid transfer, fluid storage, car crushing and crushed vehicle storage be conducted on an impervious surface. Future operations will be conducted on a 10,000 sf impervious liner surface covered by 12-24"of stone and Lynn pac that has stormwater retention, an oil separator manhole, gravity treatment and groundwater recharge units to control and treat the 1, 2 and 10 year storm events. The entire property drains to the southeast property line where a perimeter berm, 12,500 sf grassy swaie and two detention ponds will be constructed to retain and treat the water quality volume (0.5"x area) as well as the 2 and 10 year storms. A concrete control device (V-Notch weir) and rock spill way with steel surface baffle will be constructed to allow controlled discharge of larger storm events. These detention basins and swale provide retention for solids removal, oil adsorption and some biological attenuation in accordance with the Best Management Practices outlined in the DEP Stormwater Policy Handbook of March 1997. • Golf cgwlict ktr: Z °s HIGHLAND G' L ' PARK. �78 slaw Prophetlt, 4 dPdifhasterg �Ol 5 ir T& Q t �` Vm n in rC P y. .. i `L r'•4 - .. FQSl6a' r ,err r _ _�,g;/' S.>(h „ ��j • �n_.�C«-�t.�..'�r. .: � ' +.nn1L_-�--�..�j'-�i��--+ e +4 AHWI h /11x -sY, dry „t 7iJ �y,^�_.� �C i �� v�/•` .1�;i t 1 _ ,s J� a1 vlu��•i{��b�� f.��o` j � 1� r�f ) ! : ?f� 5 ��lN � �c ` e. 4 N. J �chy'�� ^�\l `` Far . /� r '%9 • 9� cy{f�hr✓ Y< Q7„.., /� /l ik T a.yy � � Par :,� e{✓{�/;. i I f;. I CI I ( .4 -;� II ch ,� 'K Shan N it � �IL'� i J oJ�v�"'+."Y f _ Z�YF Ic fi}y{h >?,. � �r#i --' i r i),. �' � \ e \ '`�•'-- jr �'Sc ' �/ > t'�Y%} �(,//� �'✓��/'I A��is� S '� lel v �n�� .:l n Vx ��h(y/ 1� / ; � l�.1t u,iie&Y6 " _ i F ?-�'ih � :1 ixr d � > . ii r :j RC$C4ci, °�` x. Rey ��luv��.�''`y �i��lt��'U \ t.. �1 � �r �✓ h ._/'�.--� vy��"31 - "r � /W.Qa.n4f# `i.0 �. " �,�" 'L X'arky \ .d- Z.`liff ^•+' Shers"�ares Z_ 1 e BlanPock �;. 111 IN my" 6 d Pt g*iail lJ 1�i%t.'c � I 1•tr.r �wr !' `/_a.; tt 0141 1 el ` r 018 t 3 SITE LOCUS FIGURE ONE 15'kQBINSON ROAD SALEM, MA _ I . . SECTION 1 WASTE HANl LE% The automobiles brought into the facility are from municipal impoundments,private towing companies, used car lots and accidents. If the cars are wrecked or damaged to the extent of possible fluid release, they must be stored on the impervious surface and drained of fluids immediately.Normal vehicles are generally checked out, appraised and placed in the lot storage areas for recovery of car parts oyer. 1-2 years. The batteries are tested and removed for resale or placed in steel containers upright for recycling_ There is a separate dumpster on the property for batteries. Fancy wheel rims and catalytic converters are removed for recycling/reuse and good tires are kept on the rims for resale. There is a tire pile for periodic tire disposal. The gasoline tanks are a higher grade of steel, so most of the time the gasoline tanks are cut out, dropped and drained of gasoline before being crushed and placed in a dedicated sealed dumpster. If the fuel pump is removed for resale the gas tank is drained at that time. With the newer car models the mercury switches are removed before they go into the yard. The air bags are left intact because they are a resale item. Before crushing the air bags (if not expended) are removed, the Freon R-12 or 22 is evacuated from the compressor and the radiators are drained and disconnected. The radiators are recycled separately. Antifreeze is held in plastic totes and recycled. The waste oils from the crankcase are removed either when the car arrives or before crushing. The other petroleum fluids, brake, transmission and power steering are removed before crushing, unless the part is being sold, then it is removed immediately. Window washer fluid is drained before crushing and reused. The process of removing fluids, cleaning parts and small spills generates oily rags, absorbant pads and clothing that needs to be segregated in a covered steel drum for disposal as an oily solid. Oil filters are removed before car crushing and drained in a wire basket over a waste oil drum for 24 hours before recycling the steel cans. The actual procedures for waste fluid removal are as follows: A. WHILE THE VEHICLE IS ON THE GROUND OPEN THE HOOD AND PERFORM • THE FOLLOWING TASKS,- 1. ASKS;1. Remove battery and place in steel container upright. 2. Open master brake cylinder and pump out contents with the 1/4" or 3/8"malleable stainless steel tube and pump. Transfer to 55 gallon waste oil drum on wheels. 3. Open power steering and transmission fluid fill lines and pump contents to waste oil drum. 4. Remove window washer fluid container and drain into window washer drum. Do not mix with waste oil or antifreeze. 5. Remove antifreeze overflow container and drain(or pump) into antifreeze drum. 6. Disconnect and remove mercury switches from the hood and tailgate. Do not break the containers, transfer in a pail to the steel open top drum labeled"mercury wastes"in the garage waste storage area. Use newspaper or bubble wrap between the layers to prevent breakage. 7. Remove detonator switches from air bags, or entire unit and transfer in a pail to a storage container(tote) in the garage. B. PLACE CAR ON CAR STAND TO DRAIN THE LINES AND TANKS BY THE FOLLOWING PROCEDURES,- 8. ROCEDURES;8. Cut the gasoline line at a low point and drain the gas into a funnel mounted on a sealed head heavy duty 55 gallon drum. If the gas does not flow freely though the inline pump, crump the line and remove the gas tank from the hanger straps. Pour the gasoline through the fill spout into the gas only 55 gallon drum over a steel tray. Keep containers closed when not in use. Daily transfer all gas collected into the secure double walled storage tank using the pneumatic pump. When draining tanks or transferring the gas the worker should wear the appropriate protective gear; a petroleum resistant apron, gloves and face shield. 9. Cut the brake lines and drain into the funnel on the waste oil drum. If the transmission has a drain plug, open and drain remaining oil. 10. Place funnel and drum under oil pan plug, open and allow to drain into the funnel. Transfer waste oil from drums to 500 gallon oil tank in containment vault with the pump, when more than 2 drums are full. Replace plug in oil pan. Take off oil filter, drain into funnel and place in separate steel waste receptacle with sealed bottom (drum or covered dumpster). 11. Place antifreeze drum and funnel under radiator drain plug, open and drain into funnel. Replace plug when finished. Transfer waste antifreeze to plastic tote daily. 12. Immediately clean up all waste oil spills with white pads and antifreeze spills with grey absorbent pads followed by speedi dri. Soak up gasoline spills with speedi dri and sweep • up. Dispose of all absorbent pads, speedi dri and regular oily rags in a covered steel drum labeled oily solids. 13. Clean up funnels,tubes, pumps and work area daily. Do not use the pumps, funnels, draw off lines or drums inter changeably. Each waste stream;waste oil, gasoline and antifreeze must have their own equipment and apparatus. �. SECTION 22 SPILT. PREVENTION In order to deal with the minor spillage and drips that are part of the removal procedures as well as be prepared for larger spills, all procedures are to be conducted over the impervious liner area. In addition a layer of HDPE, concrete and/or steel should be placed under the car stand, car crusher oil receptacles, gas tank area and other potential release zones. Spills on these surfaces should be cleaned-up as they occur at least on a daily basis. There are two storage areas for waste oil containers, fire extinguishers, absorbant pads, logs, absorbant media and safety equipment, complete with posted instructions. The procedures for implementing Spill Prevention and Control are outlined below: Prevention 1. All waste fluid containers and tanks must be capped and closed except when filling or emptying. All tanks must vented to 12' above grade. • 2. Only the specific labeled containers can be used for waste fluid storage. Separate transfer vessels, drums, totes or'tanks are to be used for waste oils (crankcase, transmission, power steering and brake fluids), gasoline, antifreeze and windshield washer. Each container over 5 gallon must be labeled as; hazardous waste, material, (ie. Waste oil, gasoline),hazard level (toxic/flammable) and have the generator name, ID and accumulation start date. 3. Transfer vessels and fluid storage containers shall only be used on impervious surfaces with fire extinguishers and spill control materials present. Storage of more than 55 gallon drums must be located in a spill containment device, or be double walled and be secured to the bottom to prevent uplift during flood events. The tank location (s) must be fenced and protected by vehicle barriers. 4. Vehicles shall only be drained of fluids, crushed and stored on impervious surfaces with containers, spill control materials and fire extinguishers present. Wrecked vehicles must also be stored on an impervious surface and any drippage cleaned up immediately. Discharge of any fluid to the ground or water is strictly prohibited. Control 5. During the operations of parts removal, fluid draining and fluid transfer some spillage will result. All spills are to be cleaned up immediately, even if they are on impervious surfaces, to prevent migration on tires or footwear. • 6 Waste oil releases are to be wiped up with grey or white absorbant pads,followed by speedi dry. 7 Antifreeze and washer fluids are to be wiped up with the grey absorbant pads. 8. Gasoline spills are to be absorbed with speedi dri and swept up. • 9 Acid spills from batteries are to be neutralized with alkaly; dry sodium bicarbonate, calcium carbonate or lime before mixing with speedi dry and being swept up. 10 Oil absorbant pads, speedi dry, regular oily hand wipes and other soiled materials must be stored separately in a HD-16 bolt and ring covered steel drum for disposal as a hazardous waste. 11 All funnels, tools,pumps, pails, tubing and work surfaces are to be wiped clean at the end of every work day and stored in a covered enclosure. 12 Personnel involved in the spill clean up or transfer of gasoline, waste oil, etc. into larger containers are required to wear protective clothing. The worker must wear an oil/gas protective apron (hycar,pvc or neoprene), rubber gloves (nitrile or neoprene) and a face mask. The fluids storage areas must have eye wash stations, fire extinguishers, spill control materials and a full face respirator available. Specific emergency procedures, telephone numbers and an evacuation route are shown on the following page and posted in three places at the facility. • • COMMUNICATION E ENCU • PROCEDURES Directions to the SALEM HOSPITAL 81 HIGHLAND AVENUE, SALEM, 1. Drive down ROBINSON ROAD to the bottom 2. Turn LEFT onto SW SCOTT RD. to the LIGHTS 3. Turn RIGHT onto HIGHLAND AVE 4. Continue I% miles and SALEM HOSPITAL, 81 HIGHLAND AVE. will be on the RIGHT AGENCY TELEPHONE ALL EMERGENCIES 911 Salem Hospital, Salem, MA (978) 741-1215 Police Dept. Business Line, Salem, MA (978) 744-1212 Fire Dept. Business Line, Salem, MA (978) 744-1235 Emergency Medical Service (EMS) (781) 539-7528 Business Line, Salem, MA Conservation Commission, Salem, MA (978) 745-9595 Dig Safe 1-888-DIG-SAFE (1-888-344-7233) MA DEP Hotline (617) 338-2255 ENVIRONMENTAL FIRM TELEPHONE SP Engineering, Inc. +(978) 745-4569 EMERGENCY PROCEDURES FIRE chi SPILT. CONTROL Owner— Mr. Fred Hutchinson ®face #: (978) 745-3472 Emergency Coordinator Mr. Mike Ferris Cell #: (978) 815-0109 Response Engineer SP Engineering, Inc. - Mr. Bruce Poole (978) 7454569 ALL EMERGENCIES 911 FIRE DEPT. BUSINESS (978) 744-1235 Evacuation Route Fire Extinguisher Locations i Spill Prevention Control Materials X: • 00 DRY = FLATS CRUSHER 0 - WASTES =a SPILL _ CONTAINMENT IMPERVIOUS SPILL LINER f O CONTROL 50' x 200' 1 STRIPPING A \ PAD 0000000 00000 000000 0 TIRES 00 OFFICE ROAD EVACUATION ROUTE OWNI-31LL d TO SWAMPSCOTT ROAD � jI o INIE IN • SECTION 3 STORNMATER NI NAGENIENT The Stormwater Management Plan has been prepared for the property at 15 Robinson Road, Salem, MA, in accordance with the Best Management Practices (BMP)promulgated by DEP and the Wetlands Protection Act MGL Chapter 131, Section 40. The submittal is designed to address the 8 standards contained in the Stormwater Management Form and provide details on the hydrology of the site pre and post development. The property is not located in the 100 year flood plain and is at 100-200' elevation.. There are Bordering Vegetative Wetlands (BVW) on the southeast and south sides of the property. The Mass GIS map is enclosed in the appendix. The 9.72 acre property is on the north west side of Swampscott Road, situated on a ledge formation with 3-6' of soil overburden. The property has contained junk cars, white metal, metal scrap, wood wastes and tires over the last 40 years. There is a small intermittent stream that runs through the property on the southeast side. The property was purchased by family of the current . owner in 1960 and has operated as an auto salvage yard since that time. A&H Auto Exchange Inc. receives old, discarded, impounded and damaged vehicles from many sources. The company stores the vehicles for a period of time for parts, and removes the batteries,tires, radiators, catalytic converters, wheel rims and other parts for recycling. Before a car is crushed for scrap steel the waste fluids (crankcase oil, transmission and brake fluid, antifreeze, gasoline and window washer fluid) are drained and placed in secure containers. Gas tanks are removed and crushed separately. In newer models the mercury switches and air bags are removed and contained for disposal. Because of more stringent regulations the owner desires to upgrade the facility and comply with new operational guidelines under the MCP and 21 E regulations. The DEP has stipulated that all crushing equipment, flat cars and wastes be stored on an impervious surface. This facility has a concrete tank enclosure and is constructing a bituminous surface under the car stripping stand and a second impervious surface that is a 10,000 sf 40 mil HDPE liner below grade with stone cover and drainage to a treatment system. The liner is surrounded by a 1-2' lynnpac berm and . the low end(south) contains an underdrain system. A deep sump manhole and oil separator is used to convey stormwater to (2) 38' recharger infiltration units. Plan views of the liner, infiltration units, detention basin and overflow weir can be found in Figure Two. 0. I _ _ 106 • � � -- \ 10 3 / 0 / ALE HOUSE �� S ❑ o D 97 New Oil and Lubricants 80 Storage 94 91 88 l Wel velocity Baer $ Existing-Stiea\ 95.91 _ . - /r J /03 Septictory wood and� c9 rb \ Ss�em Ne 15 stone dwelling �� Forebay 1 %.` 0 ( 9— �0� Zoo ez Batteries /000 Concrete 10 0-----Z Co tripping O Pod L \ems iaza ous Waste and 2 Berm ` �'� Gross g� ipill Control Gear Tire ` — - 1 4 -1 iy der Pile O 4 Iron post= — `\ 6 ,`V\9�� Waste Oil and Fluilds 6 �"'o0 'oil fence ` ti : / S;reoc�` /��✓ Containment Area 000 O Equipment O �/ g 0O��Metd%l ! o0 N Storage - f ' LOP Proposed Bar Scr 0 00 Roo ` I ` 0 F O Paddock ZO o I� �: / 4 ands BM OTP- 102 I I at TRANSECT A Liner 2 / Under � Proposed Streo m Replication Storage 09 L Foreba oo - ---- a °b ° POND N.2 I 2Berm 30'x 130 p A Bottom 78.16 -� Oi I Separator Bottom MW-4 Manhole AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES _ Over to 96.36 93.55 _�- ng Over �lo0 ( LLC 7159- B ) 80,20 In .42 Bridge Dry Stream Proposed Overflow Nature Path POND Water 79.51 To manage runoff from the roadway and car storage areas of the lot, the stormwater will ', flow into a grassy swale and detention basin designed to reduce peak flows, treat the Water Quality Volume (WQV),retain a 2 and 10 year storm, provide recharge to the groundwater, and remove greater than 80% of the Total Suspended Solids. These units will be located in the center of the property in the natural low spot beside the intermittent stream. SOIL The property has existing berms on the north and west sides, but the center of the south side has deteriorated and needs repair to prevent migration of runoff from the site directly into the stream. The repair of the berm and detention ponds will contain flood water volume. The berm fill materials are large rock and sandy loam. This means upon construction of the grassy swale certain materials may be suitable for the berms, but the material in the sides and bottom of the swale will be replaced with 1-2' of sand/gravel fill to provide a better hydraulic connection to the groundwater, which has been found at elevation 4-6'below grade. The layout also takes advantage of the existing contours and berms by directing the runoff through velocity impoundments to the control structure. The overflow outlet in the event of a 10 years or greater storm is a 164.80°concrete V Notch weir with a steel baffle to prevent floating substances (oils)from leaving the property. The Transects and Cross Sections can be seen in Figure Three. The soil maps for South Essex County show the area to be Chatfield-Hollis Rock Outcrop Complex characterized by moderately deep, well drained soils on uplands,hills and ridges with 3-35% slopes. Also in the formation is underlying granite bedrock. The soils are considered Hydrologic Group B and C with infiltration rates 0.6 to 6"hour. However, these soils have been obscured by 4-8' of fill, rock, gravel and a top layer of crushed stone (urban land). The overburden soils are packed tight in the work areas and are treated as group D (33% of area), while the car storage areas have loose soils and drain in less than one day after most storm events and are compared to Hydrologic Group C soils (2-6"/hour). The soil types and percentage cover pre and post development are compared in Table 1. It is possible that original Chatfield soils (Hydrologic group B) will be encountered in Pond 42, however, the infiltration rates used are conservative. 0 FLUIDS CONTAINME T STRUCTUR AND BERM AIL ERS IMPERVIOUS WORK AREA OIL SEPARATOR GROUNDWATER RECHARC ^1MANHOLE TWO (2) AT 40 ' J9 ``=\= LYNNPAC l 0c4 T —E5oO _STONE G1=oTEXT1LE MAT 11/2° TO 3" STONE 0 0 \\_= 00 40 DO r — GEOTEXTILE MAT �=lHppI o ® (7 v 11/2„ TO E0 = laoa03 o O0 7. 7 0 °STONE 6�0Q0,&66mo�o006�. � �a®( Tly S ° Q )7 �j 00 6" PERF PIPE- INV. 107 o oc) aba 0 a SDR 350 DCD 106.50 00 )6 I dp0 C)0 60 ©bd3 ol 6 �5 0 ©" o0o v t5- 105.00 O co d 0 000 �joDcao0060000Oo�oO �doo�� vao 6" PERS 4 3� 2 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 DISTANCE - FEET TRANSECT A SCALE : I" =20 ' HORIZONTAL I'�= i ° 'VERTICAL • i 86 ROAD 85 I RM AROUND POND AND FOREBAY 84 NEW BEB Y VELOCITY D EXISTING GRADE STEEL SURFACE BARRIER O BAFFLE CONCRETE V-NOTCH 83 �o \ FOREBAY WEIR AT 83. 00 I Q� u D \ \ OOOo GRA SSY S WALE BE af)-( POND 22 QO u- qqqnp X0. oo x x ui xxx 82 0 • o �nQo eco 0 00 �� o0 '� l/OO Q� �Q D + 6°SDR 35 FROM GRASSY XX>< X X vO w 81 O Qo O C� OIL LOG O D D O O RIP RAP 8'0 POND N° 2 � � � O 6°SDR 35 DRAIN 61, 79 . 79.0 T (� 0 0 BROOK AT 77.0 78 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 160 DISTANCE - FEET TRANSECT B SCALE : I If=20' HORIZ. , C'W VERT. TABLE ONE A&H AUTO EXCHANGE SURFACE AREA DESCRIPTION SC2 Description and SCI Drain to Center Hydrologic Group ImRervious to Pond #1 Pond #2 Dirt Ward C 52,500 76,840 Roadway D 3000 22,000 Buildings IMP 1200 1000 Car Stand IMP 800 Trailer 160 Proposed Liner INT 10,000 0 • Impervious Area (st) 12.000 1160 Total Area (s#) 679500 100,000 SC= Subcatchment; SC-1 (1.55 A) is the impervious linered work area and upper yard that drains to detention pond#1. # SC-2 (2.29A)is the parking area, house, roadway and car storage yard that drains to the grassy swale and detention pond#2. # SC-3 is another 5.88AC subeatchment that drains the upper yard into the upland forest to the north. • BEST MANAGEMENT PRAC'T'ICES • RUNOFFCONTROL The runoff calculations for the property site by the rationale method are shown in'fable 2. Because of the steep gradients, it is necessary to have two infiltrators,two detention ponds and a grassy swale. The upper work areas (car storage, stripping,crushing) are directed to Pond 41. They assume no infiltration and the BMP's are sized to retain a two and 10 year storm. The HydroCad modeling program,which is appended, incorporates time lags and minimal infiltration to show even greater capacity. The table shows that the water quality volume(WQV)of 0.5" multiplied by the impervious area(12,000 sf) is 504 CF, compared to the liner stone capacity at one/half foot depth of 1666 CF. The WQV for the entire upper area, Subcatchment-1, (67,500 sf) is 2835 CF and is also accommodated in Pond#1 at i' depth (3900 ci). Pond#1 has a maximum depth of 6' and storage capacity of 23,400 CF compared to a runoff volume of 26,325 CF for a ten year event. The storage volume in the liner cell and infiltrators is 4124 CF , which at 27,524 sf, is an overdesign of 4%, but that figure is larger when infiltration is considered. The total vertical drop from the liner area to the detention pond inlet is 4', so a single forebay at the • pond entrance would be sufficient to reduce velocity and disperse flow. During a storm event greater than a 10 year frequency, the storm water would flow under a steel surface baffle and overflow a 164° outlet weir onto rip-rap beside the stream. To accommodate the water quality volume and provide steady exit velocity, a 6" diameter outlet pipe is placed 12"above the bottom of the detention pond that drains to the rip-rap beside the stream. A twenty foot floating oil absorbant log is placed in front of the surface baffle to absorb fugitive oils. The retention time for the control structure, assuming they are full from a previous storm,provide treatment even for the 100 year storm which would generate 46,575 CF in 24 hours or an average of 32.3 CFM. There would be some solids removal and the surface baffle would hold back floating oil product and debris. RECHARGE The impervious surfaces and liners will cover approx. 0.27 acres of Hydrologic Group C soils that would have infiltrated .027 AIN (acre inch)per event. The infiltration provided by the recharger infiltrators, ponds and grassy swale is 0.048 AIN, which provides more recharge to the groundwater than original conditions. The detention pond is assumed to provide minimal infiltration(C) at 1"/hour or 0.18 AFT/Day and it would take 3.0 days to drain a 10 year storm (0.60 AF). This provides conservative design criteria. The calculations are shown in the Stormwater Management Form. The HydroCad 6.1 program was used to compare pre and post ,.on7. Ll....,.. n�a ♦.. �._A,.7 .....w..«.. A....:... __�st :_rta._a__ ___L__L _�_______ _____.�_ TABLE TWO A&H AUTO EXCHANGE RUNOFF CALCULATIONS SC 1 Run Off Volume WQV 2 Yr 10Yr 100 Yr Lot Size SF Acre 0.5" 3.1" 4.7" 8.3" 0.042' 0.258' 0.39' 0.69' RUNOFF GENERATION SCI Total 150'x450' 67,500 1.54 2835 17,415 26,325 46,575 Roadway (D) 3000 .069 Dirt Yard(C) 52,500 1.2 Impervious Building 20'x60' 1200 Car Stand 20'x40' 800 Impervious Storage Needs Liner 100'x100' 10,000 Total MP 12,000 0.27 504 3092 4680 8280 RUNOFF STORAGE VOL Proposed Pond #1 VOL @ l' VOL @ 6' BMP 30'x130'x 6' 3900 0.089 3900 23,400 Inffiltrators Storage • Liner Bed 100'x100'/3 8000 Rechargers (2) 3'x 38' 224 Stone Bed 40'x 40' 900 4124 1375 4124 SC 2 Run Off Volume WQV 2 Yr lOYr 100 Yr Lot Size SF Acre 0.5" 3.1" 4.7" 8.3" 0.042' 0.258' 0.39' 0.69' RUNOFF GENERATION SC2 Total 200'x 500' 100,000 2.29 4200 25,800 39,000 69,000 Impervious House 1000 .023 Trailer 160 .003 Roadway (D) 22000 .50 Dirt Yard (C) 76,840 1.76 RUNOFF STORAGE VOL VOL @.5' VOL @ 1' VOL @ 2' • Grassy Swale 50'x250' 12,500 .28 6250 12,500 25,000 x2' 25,000 Pond 42 30'x120' 36,00 .082 1800 @4' @4' x4' 14A00 14.400 14,400 Total RMT 39,400 8050 26,900 39,400 The subcatchment -2 area contains the existing steel, white metal, appliance and car storage • areas as well as the house, new oil storage trailer, truck parking and roadway. The gradient from this area to the proposed BNIP is 15-20' and two velocity impoundments (large rock in trench to slow flow) would be necessary before entering the forebay of Pond#2. Pond#2 would be placed beside the stream(30'w x 120' 1 x 4' = 14,400 CF)and be surrounded by a grassy swale (50' x 250' x 2') that would provide large runoff storage capacity (25,000 CF) and nutrient attenuation. The required WQV for the 100,000 sf SC-2 area is 4200 CF compared to the total storage capacity at 0.5' of 8050 CF in the detention pond (1800 CF) and grassy swale (6250 CF). A storm event greater than-a ten year frequency will flow under a steel surface baffle with oil log and overflow a 164° weir onto rip-rap beside the stream. The WQV is accommodated by a 6"diameter outlet pipe placed 0.5' above the pond bottom. LINER SYSTEM The activities of waste fluids removal, waste storage, car crushing and flat car storage must be conducted on an impervious surface to contain and prevent the release of oil, antifreeze and gasoline to the subsoils and groundwater. This project utilizes a 100'WX100'L 40 mil HDPE • liner placed 1-2' feet below grade sloping to a perforated PVC pipe underdrain at the south end. The edges of the liner rise up in a berm 1' to 2' around the perimeter. The bottom 1-1.5' of the liner cell contains large 1-1/2-3" stone for under drainage and runoff storage. This layer is covered by geotextile mat and then by i" stone and lynn pack, a stone dust mixture which packs very hard, but allows drainage. The stone dust also absorbs fugitive oil releases and can be removed periodically. The high density polyethylene (HDPE) liner is the same chemical compound used in plastic gas tanks and therefore is resistant to oil, gas and antifreeze. The liner would be protected on each side by a layer of geotextile mat, sewn together in 20' sections. The liner is heat welded and all J oints are pressured tested by the installer, N.E. Liner Co. out of Connecticut. TREATMENT BMT The impervious liner has a bermed perimeter that retains all rain events in the stone bed. The liner • runoff enters the bed and flows to the underdrain which is connected to a deep sump manhole and oil separator. The manhole has an oil absorbent log that picks up free oil. The runoff flows by gravity to (2) 38' long recharger plastic infiltration chambers in a stone bed 40'x40'x4' deep. These units are 2.5 high by 2 wide and hold 3.45 cubic feet per linear foot. The infiltration rate (at 1-2"/hour) is not sufficient to handle peak flows so there is storage capacity designed into the liner bed(void volume) of 3000 CF plus the infiltrator volume equals 4124 CF which exceeds the runoff generated during a two year rain event on the liner surface (3092 CF) by 33%. In larger • storm events the top of the stone bed is lower than the liner berms and the runoff will pass through the liner bed, separator manhole and infiltrators before discharge to the surface. Runoff leaving the infiltrator bed will still pass into Pond#1. The detention ponds have surface baffles to retain floating materials and oil logs to absorb petroleum compounds. In addition to the detention ponds which provide solids removal, debris capture and some infiltration, the grassy swale provides solids removal, nutrient and metal capture in the vegetation and soils. The low side of the grassy Swale will be graded as flat as possible to provide uniform ponding and infiltration of the runoff across the floor. The side slopes of the grassy swale will be no steeper than 3:1 (Horizontal: vertical), to allow for proper vegetative stabilization, easier mowing, easier access, and better public safety. There is no forebay planned for the grassy swale as the runoff from the slope passes through a velocity barrier and pond#2 forebay first and the runoff enters as sheet flow along the 200' wide east side. Immediately following grassy Swale construction, the bottom and side slopes of the Swale would be stabilized with a dense turf of conservation mix water tolerant grass such as fescues, bluegrass and reed canary grass. A minimum of 6"of topsoil will be conditioned with lime and slow release fertilizer before seeding and fertilized again 2-3 months later. • During the first two months, the newly established vegetation will be inspected several times to determine if any maintenance actions(reseeding, irrigation, etc.) are necessary. Trees and shrubs will not be planted within the Swale or on the impounding embankments, to prevent Swale slope failure due to root decay or subsurface disturbance. however, existing trees along the stream will remain as they provide shade on the property. The root penetration and thatch formation of the turf maintains and may enhance the original infiltration capacity. Soluble nutrients are taken up by the turf for growth, improving the pollutant removal capacity. The dense turf will impede soil erosion and scouring of the swale floor. Vegetative buffers around the perimeter of the Swale will be provided for erosion control and additional sediment and nutrient removal. The intermittent stream is downgradient of the work areas on the south side beside the driveway. The stream flows under the former Robinson Road and a majority of the runoff enters the stream at this junction. The stream floods out the neighbors septic system regularly and contaminates are transported to Tompson Nfeadow, a protected wetlands resource. T'ne only way to eliminate the introduction of pollutants is to culvert and bury the stream 260' alongside the driveway. This • would prevent runoff, sediments and groundwater generated at the salvage yard from entering the surface water. The stream length and flood volume would be replicated in the area of the former Robinson Road. NfAMENANCE • The velocity impoundments are barriers of large 3-6" stone that can become clogged by debris, plastic bags, leaves and wood. These units and the runoff trenches must be cleaned quarterly to prevent overflow and sediment erosion. If they fill with gravel and sediment,they must be removed and rebuilt. Because of space constraints, the sidewalls of the two detention ponds are constructed of rip-rap and gravel at a 1 to 1 slope.Normally this would complicate maintenance and sediment removal,however the property owner has backhoes and excavators that can reach over the berms. In addition, the ponds are accessible from the forebay end for regrading. As detention ponds and grassy swales are prone to failure due to the clogging of porous solids, it is imperative that aggressive maintenance plans and schedules be developed and implemented for these BMPs. Preventive maintenance will be performed at least once each year. Sediment will be removed from the pretreatment manhole every year and from the ponds and swale when more than 12"has accumulated. An operations and maintenance manual is included in the DEP, Stormwater Management Form. • Once the system and swale is operational, inspections will occur after every major storm for the first few months to ensure proper stabilization and function. Attention will be paid to how long water remains standing in the basin after a storm. Factors responsible for clogging (such as upland sediment erosion, excessive compaction of soils and low spots)will be repaired immediately. Thereafter, the infiltration units and Swale will be inspected at least once per year. Items to be inspected will include: differential settlement, cracking, erosion, leakage, or tree growth on the embankments, condition of riprap, sediment accumulation, and the health of the turf. At least twice a year,the side slopes and swale bottom will be mowed. Grass clippings and accumulated organic matter will be removed to prevent the formation of an impervious organic mat. Trash and debris also will be removed at this time. Deep tilling can be used to break up a clogged surface area. Any tilled areas will be revegetated immediately. Sediment will be removed from the swale as necessary. Removal procedures will not take place until the floor of the Swale is thoroughly dry. Light equipment, which will not compact the • underlying soil, will be used to remove the top layer. The remaining soil will be deeply tilled, and revegetated as soon as possible. • Deed Map • DEP Priority Resource Map Hazardous Waste Containment Layout Photographs Laboratory Reports Notice of Intent NO1 Wetland Fee Transmittal Form Stormwater Management Form Stormwater Management Calculations TSS Removal Calculations BMP Maintenance Schedule Fluid Removal Procedures Spill Prevention Control Fluid Removal Checklist • Tley- 1� _^^zz`-TN.=ti rs i _ r"r' _: C� �`C! A Y j 4-�-i • / - " _ '�,N.n�y-�^'M1+fkT �s�LS.-yj?-x''�.. - \�'.�,;,.'�• F � -rte'- L1� " r `ti' ''•��Jam. �`� ` a- �"-'�, L�� ,� -:x 1 5y "'7 SIU �1 rt�� i- < ,� - -m2"n`3�,�x W ti,.y,Y C'RE'.3� f:� i `�,._.�.�. •� Psi L rr l O y gbh r - � sos LICReg' co�� = T 40. 5• . o 36 0 74 1 15 Robinson Road Salem, MA Deed Map Plan Book 41, Plan 15 Zane Its ® IWPAs 107 \ q "� ;,u _ - . ® Zone A 1% ACECS Sole Source Aquifers Solid Waste Sites o � yr ® Protected Openspace 'HESP Estimated habitat of Rare Wildlife in 107 '< , j . Welland Areas Flu Certified Vernal Poch `'� 2003 NHESP ILE IV Subbasins r✓?,hrjur ©awns Town Arcs !o DEP Region �> County Boundaries - Ll t>5�1� , TqO ':_ I } } } If } } Aquifers.By Yield 111Gti YIELD hIEllDMYIELD �t SALEM } } } } } } }` I I Nun Potential Drinking Water Source Area Ity YIELD uwriM YtM 0 FEMA FIocdp Wins 103 YEAR 1LOODPLAN NORTH COAS..T�1L r } } Hydrograp by WATER � C3 RESERVOIR -V WETLANDS :: } � fLATSS1tOtiS SA=T',VATER WETLANDS '�' �„� �.' •� ' Rivers and Slreams . _ r+✓PERLzNNIAS YA/f NTERAItTTENT SMORE'VE (` MANMADESHORE } t } 1�/DAM Z e AOJEDUCT _ �' _ �� e' I } } ► } EOT-DTP Roads 'IAffFDACCESS UK,1nvnY 1 y �. ► } '�` T� MU=TIDACCESS,NDT "_NO tT`cDNCCESS OTHER NUMBERED NLVY +' P - ► 'ti. 1 : r rl ; �.d MAJOR ROA�',. O__CTOR C I �� }'SWAMPSCOTT RA%A1Pat8TRE<tORROAD • L�AV n.r _ "` ,x i G I �*;� Tracks and Trails ASHD MVS ... TRACK TRAIL 1 P 7W ( Transmission Unes PIPELINE POWSR-It"Ic Nwn FOSTER POND �' TRAIN DEP Priority Resource Map Proposed Hazardous Containment Layout 7. 25 — — 6" Higl1`Asphalt berm t .: i L 20 `- 40'X 22' Work Area Battery an4ainm TooIS covered by 40'K 26',.roof Storage Storage _ 15tl , Parts or Pa 2D'x22 Mise, Roof Height �` 8'x 22' T[ailer. ` DilYx Storage 20' m Front Rags tEteat 10 8'x30' 8'.x22' BS kilts a 4:: > ,. ` 7 Work Area.has liner covered Kts a b 6" hnpack and asphalt surtace f t 4 # 0 6 r On en r Total C tainm t Patl Area 2D'x22; ContainmentArs,a 18'4'x20'4" 5 Total;Contaiment Volume 372 76 Cu F4 Net Containment Volume 258 76 Cu Ft t t. " Required containment volume 105 2 Cu Ft n 1 l? } t 4... [ n(.. z0 0: 20 40 60 80 100 Container#1 -Pad —Container#2 1 Work Area . Trailer —Gas Tank- 550 Gal Gas Tank-518 Gal ��Oil Tank- 518 Gal ® ' Oil Tank 300 Gal ��AntiFreeze -250 Gal �Ant;rae3e-250 Gal containment wall 1'hx5"w � chain Unk lenge �. gllding,QMnvas C 0aln Con}ainer 3, I ., Asphalt Berm �r,�Haza Delineation . ,, . ,. , , i b u c. r, Z y]y]4LjjNNr1 � ,.� jp d 4 a SILT FENCE and STAKED BALES NORTH SIDE OF ROBINSON ROAD. ONLY TWO EMPTY TRAILERS LEFT ON THE ROAD. � a ' 1t V k 1 cry �. aha. 1 h:, I rF 1- fry Y l SILT FENCE ON SOUTH SIDE OF ROBINSON ROAD ABUTTER IN BACKGROUND A& H AUTO EXCHANGE 15 ROBINSON ROAD SALEM, MA r •� ixxy,'� ei� e. : i i3 � ��!� .�G is-.-4_ :r•,y—•.fit+±:. ' Y v ��., / � �^��is r '�"• �� +� ,��ft" f�`1 � �X s ' - AU , > �•`'r � � hip el rx1 x' W r ` a 4t s 1 pC� r CAR STRIPPING AREA,ROOF ERECTION j � r 9 '�cuwsnuu ' wm KIN r NIXG LI El t •T/` a -r WASTE FLUIDS CONTAINMENT CENTER,SAFETY GEAR, DRY WASTES AND EQUIPMENT IN STEEL TRAILERS • A& H AUTO EXCHANGE 15 ROBINSON ROAD SALEM, MA HAZARDOUS • f, WASTE I f ON<V eiWASTEDIL ONLY I�``�T 4F x Try 1 71 'Al WASTE OIL TANKS AND LABELS M RAZAR134bS WASTE. -, _ F ,�• `'• � TOXIC Z 3 ti„ M Y� GASOLINE AND ANTIFREEZE TANKS AND LABELS A& H AUTO EXCHANGE 15 ROBINSON ROAD SALEM, MA s�rox:xrt SAFETY GEAR AND WASTE DRUMS IN CONTAINER xuon AIX j '� h'APOp6 W,5tE e w e r I CONCRETE CONTAINMENT AREA FOR WASTE OH., GASOLINE AND ANTIFREEZE A& H AUTO EXCHANGE 15 ROBINSON ROAD SALEM,MA _ 1 F' .rt � tom- +nr v § 41 _ -._ _ f- ane.- _.arS •us' M MR PLACE GKOTE'A i WG IN BAMN,a7TnVH TOGETHER n COVER GEOTEXTILE WITH 40MEL HDPE LINER, • DIGANCHOR TRENCH IN BERMS PATTY'S AUTO PARTS 140 SALEM TURNPhM SAUGUS,MA I i i f �w Is xWE Fm�M1 i t �v 1 1 ` � !! 1 9►' 1 �i X11 i :I ' 1 ' +I . ''moi?-4�'�A c"' ✓ ,.-i -, y _. . ... �` . - .. �� '`4•usY"„�>Y��.er<` f'+;y"}Y K U'-?� � x.ecA � SK Eby;"zA4.i :=. ' .b. 2'� �.. i �S�s g� =An` x-��'�'"<t -lam '�� t'•�`�.`. I. ."� Y""is x `�;��'"F.• �r`�.x 4.3! rte' .t ei'�"� .�+ iK2Y ��"'� �«'-'�� ti- ' COVER LINER& MAT WITH 1-lnL 3" STONE, 0.5 TO 1S' DEEP Y, Z � Aa ox dft �1.,.�x'�-.5` �Y. � '+'1 �1�i'��'a'�...�`\�"�+�Yt r` �,��7Y'd".�.vHy�X��-:• �`��2s PLACE GEOTEXTHx MAT OVER STONE PATTY'S AUTO PARTS 140 SALEM TURNPIKE,SAUGUS,MA 4 ` y ti 6 gSr,,,, 1,,.� _! ^-'• may= I yM;y'��, y°x.,9 �Ii9 { + a \ A ��ww � { '.sup �y•_ r �j a.., •'PM4� .K<, i�, EAST END GRASSY SWALE II -4t. - �.SY.S.�'^ _ :- WEST END GRASSY SWALE PATTYS AUTO PARTS LOT 2A SALEM TURNPIKE SAUGUS,MA i • A [P.-GINEERING, P.O. Box 848 ^ Salem, Massachusetts 01970 ,Telephone: 978-745-4569 • Fax: 978-745-4881 Client: A&H Auto Exchange Date: May 31, 2006 15 Robinson Road Salem, MA. 01970 LAB CERTIFICATION#MA00034 ----------------------- LABORATORY REPORT ------------------------------------- Sample Type: Well Water Surface Water Surface Water Sample From: House Well Brook Entering Brook Leaving Ree. Sample ID#: 605007 605008 605009 Limits Date ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Total Coliform bacteria Col/100m1 0 80 120 0/100 ml 05/11/06 Heterotrophic Plate • Count bacteria Col/100m1 TNTC * 100/100 ml 05/11/06 Fecal Coliform bacteria Col/100ml - 68 20 05/11/06 Lead mg/1 0.0083 <0.015 <0.015 0.015 05/23/06 Mercury mg/l 0.00187 * <.0002 <,0002 0.001 05/18/06 * Exceeds Drinking Water Standards Sampled By: B. Poole, after 1" rain event Sampled On: 05/11/06 Sample Received: 05/11/06 The information contained in this report is, to the best of my knowledge accurate and complete. Date: Laboratory Director: A & H AUTO EXCHANGE Groundwater Analysis 15 Robinson Road, Salem, MA. Well Brook DEP Volatile Organic Water Water GW-1 Compounds ag11 604056 604047 Limits MTBE 31.7 <1.0. 700 Ethyl tert butyl ether 2.9 <1.0 700 Metals mgd Arsenic <0.016 • Barium 0.432 0.433 30.0 Cadmium <0.005 Chromium <0.01 Lead <0.015 3.70* .015 Mercury 0.00104* 0.00104 0.001 Silver <0.02 Selenium <0.03 EPI in C9-Cl8Aliphatics <0.2 C19-C36 Aliphatics <0.2 C11-C22Aromaties <0.2 PAHs <5.0 a>=/1 • * =Exceeds GW-1 standards Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by DEP: Bureau.of Resource Protection -Wetlands DEP File Number WrPA i Form 3 ® Notice of Intent 'Document Transaction Number Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 Salem City/Town Important: When filling out A. General Information fortes on the computer,use 1. Project Location (Note: electronic filers will click on button for GIS locator): only the tab key to move your 15 Robinson Road Salem 01970 cursor-do not use the return a.Street Address b.City/Town C.Zip Code key. Latitude and Longitude: 42.491969 -70.920072 d. Latitude e. Longitude 6 Lot 13 f.Assessors Map/Plat Number g. Parcel/Lot Number 2. Applicant: Mike Ferris A&H Auto Exchange Inc. a. First Name b.Last Name c.Company Note: 15 Robinson Road Before d.Mailing Address completing this form consult Salem MA 01970 your local e.CityfTown f.State g.Zip Code Conservation 978-815-0109 Commission h. Phone Number 1. Fax Number j.Email address regarding any municipal bylaw 3. Property owner(if different from applicant): ❑ Check if more than one owner ordinance. Mountain Realty Trust a. First Name b. Last Name c.Company 15 Robinson Road d.Mailing Address Salem MA 01970 e.City/Town f.State g.Zip Code 978-815-0109 h. Phone Number i.Fax Number j.Email address 4. Representative (if any): SP Engineering Inc. a.Firm Bruce Poole b. Contact Person First Name c.Contact Person Last Name P.O. Box 848 d. Mailing Address Salem MA 01970 e.City/Town f.State g.Zip Code 978-745-4569 978-745-4881 h.Phone Number i.Fax Number j.Email address 5. Total WPA Fee Paid (from NO] Wetland Fee Transmittal Form): $1550.00 $762.50 $787.50 a.Total Fee Paid b.State Fee Paid c.City/Town Fee Paid • 6. General Project Description: Construction of impervious surface (liner) for vehicle work area and associated Stormwater Management Plan per DEP administrative order. Enclose lower portion of intermittent stream and replicate in former roadway. wpafortn1doc>rev.4/12/06 Page 1 of 7 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by DEP: Bureau"of Resource Protection - Wetlands DEP FileNumber A Form 3 — Notice of Intent Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 Salem nt Tansactip Number Salem Cityfrown A. General information (continued) 7. Project Type Checklist: a. ❑ Single Family Home b. ❑ Residential Subdivision c. ❑ Limited Project Driveway Crossing d. ® CommerciaUindustrial e. ❑ Dock/Pier f. ❑ Utilities g. ❑ Coastal Engineering Structure h. ❑ Agriculture—cranberries, forestry I. ❑ Transportation j. ❑ Other 8. Property recorded at the Registry of Deeds for: Southern Essex 105 a. County b. Page Number • 7428 Plan Book 41, Plan 15 c.Book d.Certificate#(if registered land) 9. Has work been performed on the property under an Order of Resource Area Delineation involving Simplified Review within 3 years of the date of this application? a. ❑ Yes b. ® No If yes, no Notice of Intent or Request for Determination of Applicability may be filed for work within the 50-foot-wide area in the Buffer Zane along the resource area during the three-year term of an Order of Resource Area Delineation, or any Extended Order, or until the applicant receives a Certificate of Compliance, whichever is later. 10. Buffer Zone Only -Is the project located only in the Buffer Zone of a bordering vegetated wetland, inland bank, or coastal resource area? a. ❑ Yes-answer 11 below, then skip to Section C. b. ® No -skip to Section B. 11. Buffer Zone Setback—For projects that involve work only in the buffer zone, select the applicable adjacent resource area (check one): a. ❑ BVW J. ❑ inland bank c. ❑ coastal resource area • The distance between the closest project disturbance and the associated resource area is: 20'to detention basin 1*paforrn3.doc•rev.4112/06 Page 2 of 7 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by DEP: Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands DEP File Number A For 3 ® Notice of intent Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 Salem Document Transaction Number alem CofTown B. Resource Area Effects 1. Inland Resource Areas Check all that apply below. Attach narrative and any supporting documentation describing how the project will meet all performance standards for each of the resource areas altered, including standards requiring consideration of alternative project design or location. Online Users: Include your Resource Area Size of Proposed Alteration Proposed Replacement(if any) document 260 200 transaction a. ® Bank 1.linear feet 2. linear feet number b. ❑ Bordering Vegetated (provided on Wetland 1,square feet z.square feet your receipt page)with all c. ❑ Land Under 1.square feet 2.square feet supplementary Waterbodies and information you Waterways 3.cubic yards dredged submit to the Department. d. ® Bordering Land 2080 2000 Subject to Flooding 1.square feet z.square feet 10,400 10,000 . 3.cubic feet of flood storage lost 4.cubic feet of flood storage replaced e. ❑ Isolated Land Subject to Flooding 1.square feet 2.cubic feet of flood storage lost 3.cubic feet of flood storage replaced ❑ For f. ❑ Riverfront area 1. Name of Waterway(if available) projects impacted by 1. Width of Riverfront Area(check one): the riverfront area and a ❑ 25 ft. - Designated Densely Developed Areas only buffer zone of another ❑ 100 ft. - New agricultural projects only resource area, add ❑ 200 ft. -All other projects 50% to the total fee. 2. Total area of Riverfront Area on the site of the proposed project: Square Feet 3. Proposed alteration of the Riverfront Area: a.Total Square Feet b.Square Feet within 100 it. c Square Feet between 100 ft.and 200 ft. 4. Has an alternatives analysis been done and is it attached to this NOI? ❑ Yes❑ No 5. Was the lot where the activity is proposed created prior to August 1, 1996? ❑ Yes❑ No • wpafonn3.doc•rev.4/12/06 Page 3 of Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by DEP: Bureau'of Resource Protection - Wetlands DEP File Number PA Form 3 - Notice of intent Lid Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 Document Transaction Number Salem City/Town B. Resource Area Effects 2. Coastal resource Areas: Check all that apply below. Attach narrative and supporting documentation describing how the project will meet all performance standards for each of the resource areas altered, including standards requiring consideration of alternative project design or location. Online Users; Include your Resource Area Size of Proposed Alteration Proposed Replacement(if any) document transaction a. ❑ Designated Port Areas Indicate size under Land Under the Ocean, below number (provided on b. ❑ Land Under the Ocean 1,Square feet your receipt page)with all 2.Cubic yards dredged supplementary information you C. Barrier Beach Indicate size under Coastal Beaches and/or Coastal Dunes ❑ submit to the below Department. d. ❑ Coastal Beaches 1.Square feet 2.Cubic yards beach nourishment • e. ❑ Coastal Dunes 1,Square feet 2. Cubic yards dune nourishment f. ❑ Coastal Banks 1.Linear feet g. ❑ Rocky Intertidal Shores 1.Square feet h. ❑ Salt Marshes 1.Square feet 2.Sq ft restoration,rehab.,or creation i. ❑ Land Under Salt Ponds 1.Square feet 2.Cubic yards dredged j. ❑ Land Containing Shellfish 1.Square feet 2.Square feet restoration, rehab. k. ❑ Fish Runs Indicate size under Coastal Banks, inland Bank, Land Under the Ocean, and/or inland Land Under Waterbodies and Waterways, above 1.Cubic yards dredged i. ❑ Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage 1.Square feet 3. Limited Project: • Is any portion of the proposed activity eligible to be treated as a limited project subject to 310 CMR 10.24 or 310 CMR 10.53? a. ® Yes ❑ No If yes, describe which limited project applies to this project: 10.53q Mitigation of release or threat of release of hazardous material. b. Limited Project wpaform3.doc•rev.4112/06 Page 4 of 7 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by DEP: Bureau.of Resource Protection - Wetlands DEP File Number PA For 3 - Notice of Intent l ` Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 Document Transaction Number Salem Cityfrown Ca Bordering Vegetated Watland Delineation Methodology Check all methods used to delineate the Bordering Vegetated Wetland (BVW) boundary: Online Users: 1. ❑ Final Order of Resource Area Delineation issued by Conservation Commission or DEP Include your (attached) document transaction 2. ❑ DEP BVW Field Data Form (attached) number (provided on 3. ❑ Final Determination of Applicability issued by Conservation Commission or DEP (attached) your receipt page) with all 4 ® Other Methods for Determining the BVW Boundary (attach documentation): supplementary information you a. ® 50% or more wetland indicator plants submit to the Department. b. ® Saturated/inundated conditions exist c. ❑ Groundwater indicators d. ❑ Direct observation For all projects Avecting other e. ® Hydric soil indicators esource Areas, please f. ❑ Credible evidence of conditions prior to disturbance attach a narrative 5. Other resource areas delineated: explaining how D. Other Applicable Standards and Requirements the resource Ph q area was delineated. 1. Is any portion of the proposed project located in estimated habitat as indicated on the most recent Estimated Habitat Map of State-Listed Rare Wetland Wildlife published by the Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program? a. ❑ Yes ® No If yes, include proof of mailing or hand delivery of NOI to: Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program Division of Fisheries and Wildlife Route 135 North Drive b. Date of Map Westborough, MA 01581 2. For coastal projects only, is any portion of the proposed project located below the mean high water line or in a fish run? a. ❑ Yes ® No If yes include proof of mailing or hand delivery of NO] to: Division of Marine Fisheries -Southeast Marine Fisheries Station 50A Portside Drive Pocasset, MA 02559 b. ❑ Not applicable—project is in inland resource area only 3. Is any portion of the proposed project within an Area of Critical Environmental Concern (ACEC)? a. ❑ Yes Z No If yes, provide name of ACEC (see instructions to WPA Form 3 or DEP Website for ACEC locations). Note: electronic filers click on Website. b.ACEC wpaform3.doc•rev.4/12106 Page 5 of 7 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by DEP: Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands DEP File.Number Pio Form 3 — Notice of Intent Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 Document Transaction NumberSalem Cityfrown D. Other Applicable Standards and Requirements Online Users: 4. Is any portion of the site subject to a Wetlands Restriction Order under the inland Wetlands Include your Restriction Act(M.G.L. c. 131, §40A) or the Coastal Wetlands Restriction Act(M.G.L. c. 130, § 105)? document transaction a. ❑ Yes ® No number (provided on your receipt 5. is any activity within any Resource Area or Buffer Zone exempt from performance standards of the page)with all wetlands regulations, 310 CMR 10.00. supplementary information you a. ❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe which exemption applies to this project: submit to the Department. b. Exemption 6. Is this project subject to the DEP Stormwater Policy? a. ® Yes ❑ No If yes, stormwater management measures are required.Applicants should complete the Stormwater Management Form and submit it with this form. b. If no, explain why the project is exempt • E. Additional Information Applicants must include the following with this Notice of Intent(NOI). See instructions for details. Online Users: Attach the document transaction number(provided on your receipt page)for any of the following information you submit to the Department. 1. ® USGS or other map of the area (along with a narrative description, if necessary) containing sufficient information for the Conservation Commission and the Department to locate the site. (Electronic filers may omit this dem.) 2. ® Plans identifying the location of proposed activities (including activities proposed to serve as a Bordering Vegetated Wetland [BVW] replication area or other mitigating measure) relative to the boundaries of each affected resource area. 3. ❑ Other material identifying and explaining the determination of resource area boundaries shown on plans (e.g., a DEP BVW Field Data Form). 4. ® List the titles and dates for all plans and other materials submitted with this NOI. 5. ❑ If there is more than one property owner, please attach a list of these property owners not listed on this form. 6. ❑ Attach proof of mailing for Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program, if needed. • 7. ❑ Attach proof of mailing for Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries, if needed. a. ® Attach NOI Wetland Fee Transmittal Form 9. Attach Stormwater Management Form, if needed. wpaform3.doc•rev.4112106 Page 6 of 7 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Prowdedrby,DEP..: Bureau•of Resource Protection - Wetlands DEP File Number WP/4 Form 3 - Notice of Intent Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 Document Transact on Number Salem city/rown F. Fees The fees for work proposed under each Notice of Intent must be calculated and submitted to the Conservation Commission and the Department(see Instructions and NOI Wetland Fee Transmittal Form). No filing fee shall be assessed for projects of any city, town, county, or district of the Commonwealth, federally recognized Indian tribe housing authority, municipal housing authority, or the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. Applicants must submit the following information (in addition to pages 1 and 2 of the NCI Wetland Fee Transmittal Form)to confirm fee payment 1. Municipal Check Number 2.Check date 3.State Check Number. 4.Check date 5. Payor name on check:First Name 6.Payor name on check:last Name G. Signatures and Submittal Requirements I hereby certify under the penalfies of perjury that the foregoing Notice of Intent and accompanying • plans, documents, and supporting data are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the Conservation Commission will place notification of this Notice in a local newspaper at the expense of the applicant in accordance with the wetlands regulations, 310 CMR 10.05(5)(a). I further certify under penalties of perjury that all abutters were notified of this application, pursuant to the requirements of M.G.L. c. 131 0. Notice must be made in writing by hand delivery or certified mail (return re r quested) abutters within 100 feet of the property line of the project location. ofA of Date Sig i sture of Property Owner(if ditrerent) Date Signature of Representative(if any) Date For Conservation Commission: Two copies of the completed Notice of Intent(Form 3), including supporting plans and documents; two copies of pages 1 and 2 of the NOI Wetland Fee.Transmittal Form; and the city/town fee payment must be sent to the Conservation Commission by certified mail or hand delivery. For DEP: One copy of the completed Notice of Intent(Form 3), including supporting plans and documents; one copy of pages 1 and 2 of the NOI Wetland Fee Transmittal Form; and a copy of the state fee payment must be sent to the DEP Regional Office(see Instructions) by certified mail or hand delivery. (E-filers may submit these electronically.) Other: . If the applicant has checked the'yes'box in any part of Section D, Item 3, above, refer to that section and the Instructions for additional submittal requirements. The original and copies must be sent simultaneously. Failure by the applicant to send copies in a timely manner may result in dismissal of the Notice of Intent. wpafonn3.doc•rev.4/12106 Page 7 of 7 Lli�assachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands N01 Wetland Fee Transmittal Form Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 Important: A. Applicant Information When filling out forms on the 1. Applicant: computer, use only the tab Mike Ferris A&H Auto Exchange Inc. key to move a. First Name b.Last Name c.Company your cursor- 15 Robinson Road do not use the d.Mailing Address return key. Salem MA 01970 e.Citylrown f.State g.Zip Code 978-745-3472 h.Phone Number 2. Property Owner(if different): Mountain Realty Trust a. First Name b. Last Name c.Company 15 Robinson Road d.Mailing Address Salem MA 01970 e.Cityrrown f.State g.Zip Code 978-745-3472 • h. Phone Number 3. Project Location: 15 Robinson Road Salem a.Street Address b.City/town To calculateFeesfiling fees, refer B.to the category Notice of Intent(Form 3)or Abbreviated Notice of Intent(Form 4): fee list and examples in the The fee should be calculated using the following six-step instructions for 9 9 p process and worksheet. Please see filling out WPA Instructions before filling out worksheet Fond 3(Notice of Intent). Step tfrype of Activity: Describe each type of activity that will occur in wetland resource area and buffer zone. Step 2/Number of Activities: Identify the number of each type of activity. Step 3/Individual Activity Fee: Identify each activity fee from the six project categories listed in the instructions. Step 4/Subtotal Activity Fee: Multiply the number of activities(identified in Step 2)times the fee per category (identified in Step 3)to reach a subtotal fee amount. Note: If any of these activities are in a Riverfront Area in addition to another Resource Area or the Buffer Zone, the fee per activity should be multiplied by 1.5 and then added to the subtotal amount. is Step 5rrotal Project Fee: Determine the total project fee by adding the subtotal amounts from Step 4. Step 6/Fee Payments: To calculate the state share of the fee, divide the total fee in half and subtract $12.50. To calculate the city/town share of the fee, divide the total fee in half and add $12.50. `Np2lonn3.d=•N01 Wetland Fee Trensmid Fam•rev.311105 Page I a 2 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau-of Resource Protection - Wetlands N01 Wetland Fee Transmiffal Form Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 B. Fees (continued) Step lfrype of Activity Step 2/Number Step Step 4/SUbtotal Activity of Activities 3/Individual Fee Activity Fee 2g Stormwater Management 1 $500.00 $500.00 3a Site Preparation 1 $1050.00 $1050.00 • Step 5/Total Project Fee: $1550.00 Step 6/Fee Payments: Total Project Fee: $1550.00 a.Total fee from Step 5 State share of filing fee: $762.50 b. 112 total fee less$12.50 City/Town share of filling fee: $767.50 c. 1/2 total fee plus$12.30— C. Submittal Requirements a.) Complete pages 1 and 2 and send with a check or money order for the state share of the fee, payable to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Department of Environmental Protection Box 4062 Boston, MA 02211 b.) To the Conservation Commission: Send the Notice of intent or Abbreviated Notice of Intent; a copy of this form; and the city/town fee payment. c.) To DEP Regional Office (see Instructions): Send a copy of the Notice of Intent or Abbreviated . Notice of Intent; a copy of this form; and a copy of the state fee payment. (E-filers of Notices of Intent may submit these electronically.) Wpafmm3.dcc-NO]Wefland Fee Transmittal Farm•rev.3/1/05 Page 2 of 2 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands Stormwater Management Form. Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 A. Property Information Important: When filling out 1. The proposed project is: forms on the computer, use a. New development ❑ Yes ® No only the tab key to move b. Redevelopment ❑ Yes ® No your cursor- do not use the (If yes, distinguish redevelopment components from return key. c. Combination ❑ Yes ® No new development components on plans). 2. Stormwater runoff to be treated for water quality is based on the following calculations: a. ❑ 1 inch of runoff x total impervious area of post-development site for discharge to critical areas (Outstanding Resource Waters, recharge areas of public water supplies, shellfish growing areas, swimming beaches, cold water fisheries). Note: b. ® 0.5 inches of runoff x total impervious area of post-development site for other resource areas. This November 2000 version of the Stormwater Management B. Stormwater Management Standards �orn supersedes arlier versions Management DEP's Stormwater Mana Policy includes nine standards that are listed on the including those g y(March 1997) contained in following pages. Check the appropriate boxes for each standard and provide documentation and DEP's additional information when applicable. Stormwater Handbooks. Standard#1: Untreated stormwater a. ® The project is designed so that new stormwater point discharges do not discharge untreated stormwater into, or cause erosion to, wetlands and waters. Standard#2: Post-development peak discharges rates a. ❑ Not applicable— project site contains waters subject to tidal action. Post-development peak discharge does not exceed pre-development rates on the site at the point of discharge or downgradient property boundary for the 2-yr, 10-yr, and 100-yr, 24-hr storm. b. ❑ Without stormwater controls c. ® With stormwater controls designed for the 2-yr, and 10-yr storm, 24-hr storm. d. ® The project as designed will not increase off-site flooding impacts from the 100-yr, 24-hr storm. J wpaf0rm3.doc•Stormwater Managamerd Farm•rev.311105 Page 1 of 5 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau"of Resource Protection -Wetlands Stormwater Management Form Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 B. Stormwater Management Standards (cont.) Standard #3: Recharge to groundwater Amount of impervious area (sq. ft.) to be infiltrated: 10.000 a.square feet Volume to be recharged is based on: b. ❑ The following Natural Resources Conservation Service hydrologic soils groups (e.g. A, B, C, D, or UA) or any combination of groups: 1.6 Infiltrator C 60 Ponds C 1. %of impervious area 2. Hydrologic soil group 3.%of impervious area 4.Hydrologic soil group 125 Grassy C 5.%of impervious area 6.Hydrologic soil group 7.%of impervious area 8.Hydrologic soil group c. ❑ Site specific pre-development conditions: 0.10"/hr1. Recharge rate 2.Volume d. Describe how the calculations were determined: . General rate (0.10'Yhr)applied to dirt yard based on soil types and ledge presence. See Standard 3 table. e. List each BMP or nonstructural measure used to meet Standard#3 (e.g. dry well, infiltration trench). (2)40' infiltrators 2 detention ponds and grassy swale Does the annual groundwater recharge for the post-development site approximate the annual recharge from existing site conditions? f. ® Yes ❑ No Standard #4: 80% TSS Removal a. ® The proposed stormwater management system will remove 80% of the post-development site's average annual Total Suspended Solids (TSS) load. b. Identify the BMP's proposed for the project and describe how the 80%TSS removal will be achieved. Deep Sump Oil Separator manhole, subsurface infiltrators detention ponds and grassy swale See Worksheet WPafolmE.doa•Stai nater Management Farm•rev.all 105 Page 2 of 5 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau.of Resource Protection - Wetlands Stormwater Management Form Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 B. Stormwater Management Standards (cont.) c. If the project is redevelopment, explain how much TSS will be removed and briefly explain why 80% removal cannot be achieved. Standard #5: Higher potential pollutant loads See Stormwater Policy Handbook Coes the project site contain land uses with higher potential pollutant loads Vol. I, page 1-23, for land uses of a. ® Yes ❑ No b. If yes, describe land uses: high pollutant loading (see Storage of cars for parts and metal recycling. Instructions). c. Identify the BMPs selected to treat stormwater runoff. If infiltration measures are proposed, describe the pretreatment. (Note: If the area of higher potential pollutant loading is upgradient of a critical area, infiltration is not allowed.) Runoff from the liner bed flows through a deep sump catch basin oil separator, oil absorbent logs recharger infiltrators, and detention ponds. Before infiltration in ponds the runoff will pass through velocity barriers and forebays to remove settleable solids Standard #6: Protection of critical areas See Stormwater Will the project discharge to or affect a critical area? Policy Handbook Vol. I, page 1-25, for critical areas a. ❑ Yes ® No b. If yes, describe areas: (see Instructions). c. Identify the BMPs selected for stormwater discharges in these areas and describe how BMPs meet restrictions listed on pages 1-27 and 1-28 of the Stormwater Policy Handbook—Vol. I: Wpaf 3.eoo•3rort ater Menagemem Porth•rev.NIM5 Page 3 of 5 LlMassachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands St®rmwater Management Forge Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 B. Stormwater Management Standards (cont.) Note: components of Standard #7: Redevelopment projects redevelopment projects which Is the proposed activity a redevelopment project? plan to develop previously a. ❑ Yes X No b:-If yes, the following stormwater management standards have been met: undeveloped areas do not fall under the scope of Standard 7. c. The following stormwater standards have not been met for the following reasons: • d. ❑ The proposed project will reduce the annual pollutant load on the site with new or improved stormwater control. Standard #8: Erosion/sediment control a. ® Erosion and sediment controls are incorporated into the project design to prevent erosion, control sediments, and stabilize exposed soils during construction or land P 9 disturbance. Controls include berms oil loos staked hay bales and siltation fence Standard #9: Operation/maintenance plan a. ® An operation and maintenance plan for the post-development stormwater controls have been developed. The plan includes ownership of the stormwater BMPs, parties responsible for operation and maintenance, schedule for inspection and maintenance, routine and long-term maintenance responsibilities, and provision for appropriate access and maintenance easements extending from a public right-of-way to the stormwater controls. Site Plan b. PlanMtle - c.Date • d. Plan/Title e. Date WPafam3.doc•Sionnwater Management Farm•rev.311105 Page 4 of 5 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands Stormwater Management Form Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 C. Submittal Requirements Online Users: DEP recommends that applicants submit this form, as well as, supporting documentation and plans, Include your with the Notice of Intent to provide stormwater management information for Commission review document consistent with the wetland regulations (310 CMR 10.05 (6)(b)) and DEP's Stormwater Management transaction Policy (March 1997). If a particular stormwater management standard cannot be met, information number should be provided to demonstrate how equivalent water quality and water quantity protection will be (provided on provided. DEP encourages engineers to use this form to certify that the project meets the stormwater your receipt management standards as well as acceptable engineering standards. For more information, consult page)with all the Stormwater Management Policy. supplementary information you submit to the Department D. Signatures Michael Ferris Applicant Name Date J Representative(if any) Date Signature Wpe(orm3.tlac-Stormwater Management Fcm•rev.3/1ID5 Page 6 of 5 A&H AUTO EXCHANGE STORtMWATER IMANAGEiVIENT • STANDARD 3 : Recharge to Groundwater Proposed Impervious Area= 0.27 AC (Post) = 0.27 AC Net Gain Liner Recharge Lost HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP AREA(AC) Rate Volume A .00 (post) — .00 (pre) = .00 x .4" _ .00 AC 12V B .00 (post) — .00 (pre) = 0x.25" = 0 C .27 (post) — .25 (pre) = .27x.10" _ .027 AC IN D .00(post) — .00 (pre)= Waive = 0 Total .027 AC IN Recharge Volume : from Infiltrators .036 AC x .10" = .0036 from Pond #1 .089 AC x .10 — .0089 from Pond#2 .082 AC x .10"= .0081 from Grassy Swale .28 AC x .10"= .028 Total Recharge Volume=0.0486 Twice Lost Volume • A&H AUTO EXCHANGE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT • (Continued) STANDARD 5 : Water Quality Volume A 0.5" 2 Year 10 Year BMP Area WOV 31" 4.7" SC-1 0.27 A 0.011 AF 0,069 AF 0.10 AF Impervious Liner Bed 0.23 A Infiltrator Bed 0.036 A @ 6" @ 12" @ 18" 0.267 A *0.044 0.089 0.133 SC-I Total 0.54 A 0.065 0.40 0.60 @6" @3' @6' Pond 1 0.089 A 0.044 0.267 0.534 Liner Beds 0.267 A 0.028 0.178 0.178 0.356 A 0.071 AF 0.445 AF 0.712 AF % Overdesign 10% 11% 19% • SC-2 Total 2.29 A 0.096 0.59 0.89 @ 6" @ 2' @ 2' Grassy Swale 0.28 A 0.14 0.56 0.56 @ 4' Pond 2 0.082 A 0.041 0.16 0.320 0.362 A 0.181 AF 0.72 AF 0.88 AF % Overdesign 88% 29% 0% *WQV Based on 0.5"x Impervious Area, compared to 6"in liner bed, with 33%void capacity. A&II AUTO EXCHANGE , 15 ROBINSON ROAD, SALEM,NIA • TSS REMOVAL CALCULATIONS Standard 4, Solids Removal A B C D E TSS Removal Starting TSS Amount Remaining SC-1 BMP Rate % Load Removed (BxQ Load (C-D) Deep Sump 25 100* mg/l 25 75 Oil Separator Infiltrators &Pond#1 80 75 60 15 SC-2 Forebay 10 100 10 90 Grassy Swale 30 90 27 63 Detention Pond#2 70 63 44 19 TOTAL TSS REMOVAL SC-I= 85% TOTAL, TSS REMOVAL SC-2= 81% t Equals load which enters the BMP Project: A&Ii AUTO EXCHANGE Prepared by: Bruce Poole Date: June 16,2006 • A&H AUTO EXCHANGE • MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE FOR BMF Standard 9 Structure Inspection Maintenance Liner Bed Monthly Remove oil stained dirt, regrade as necessary,pick-up parts and trash, cover any exposed liner Deep Sump Annually Sump to be cleaned 1 time per year. Catch Basins & Oil log replaced I time/year or more Oil Separator often if soiled Recharger Unfits Annually To be cleaned when sediment level Is greater than 6", replace if collapsed. Grassy Swale Inspect after every Top of swale/ponds shall be mowed Major storm event twice during growing season and For first 3 months accumulated leaves, trash and debris • after construction, removed(June and October). then twice per year. Detention Pond & Annually Sediment to be removed as necessary Overflow Structure when greater than 6"deep. Sediment removal should not take place uhtil bottom of basin is dry. Deep tilling can be used to break up clogged surface areas. Any tilled area to be revegetated immediately. Over flood weir and surface baffle shall be kept level and intact, any berm erosion should be repaired immediately. Velocity Barriers & Twice Annually Remove plastic, sticks, leaves, Forebay check sediment level, clean and Rebuild when>1211 deep. • WASTE FLUID REMOVAL PROCEDURES • A. WHILE THE VEHICLE IS ON THE GROUND OPEN THE HOOD AND PERFORM THE FOLLOWING TASKS; 1. REMOVE BATTERY AND PLACE IN STEEL CONTAINER UPRIGHT. 2. OPEN MASTER BRAKE CYLINDER AND PUMP OUT CONTENTS WITH THE '/a"OR 3/8"MALLEABLE STAINLESS STEEL TUBE AND DIAPHRAGM PUMP.TRANSFER TO 55 GALLON WASTE OIL DRUM ON WHEELS. 3. OPEN POWER STEERING AND TRANSMISSION FLUID FILL LINES AND PUMP CONTENTS TO WASTE OIL DRUM. 4. REMOVE WINDOW WASHER FLUID CONTAINER AND DRAIN INTO WINDOW WASHER DRUM. DO NOT MIX WITH WASTE OIL OR ANTIFREEZE. 5. REMOVE ANTIFREEZE OVERFLOW CONTAINER AND DRAIN (OR PUMP)INTO ANTIFREEZE DRUM 6. DISCONNECT AND REMOVE MERCURY SWITCHS FROM THE HOOD AND TAILGATE. DO NOT BREAK THE CONTAINERS, TRANSFER IN A PAIL TO THE 55 GALLON OPEN TOP DRUM LABELED MERCURY WASTES IN THE GARAGE WASTE STORAGE AREA. USE NEWSPAPER OR BUBBLE WRAP BETWEEN THE LAYERS TO PREVENT BREAKAGE. 7. REMOVE DETONATOR SWITCHES FROM AIR BAGS, OR ENTIRE UNIT AND TRANSFER IN A PAIL TO A STORAGE CONTAINER(TOTE) IN THE GARAGE. B. PLACE CAR ON CAR STAND TO DRAIN THE LINES AND TANKS BY THE FOLLOWING PROCEDURES; • 8. CUT THE GASOLINE LINE AT A LOW POINT AND DRAIN THE GAS INTO A FUNNEL MOUNTED ON A SEALED HEAD HEAVY DUTY 55 GALLON DRUM. IF THE GAS DOES NOT FLOW FREELY THOUGH THE INLINE PUMP, CRIMP THE LINE AND REMOVE THE GAS TANK FROM THE HANGER STRAPS. POUR THE GASOLINE THROUGH THE FILL SPOUT INTO THE GAS ONLY 55 GALLON DRUM. KEEP CONTAINERS CLOSED WHEN NOT IN USE. DAILY TRANSFER ALL GAS COLLECTED INTO THE SECURE DOUBLE WALLED STORAGE TANK USING THE PNEUMATIC PUMP.WHEN DRAINING TANKS OR TRANSFERRING THE GAS THE WORKER SHOULD WEAR THE APPROPRIATE PROTECTIVE GEAR;A PETROLEUM RESISTANT APRON, GLOVES AND FACE SHIELD. 9. CUT THE BRAKE LINES AND DRAIN INTO THE FUNNEL ON THE WASTE OIL DRUM. IF THE TRANSMISSION HAS A DRAIN PLUG, OPEN AND DRAIN REMAINING OIL. 10. PLACE FUNNEL AND DRUM UNDER OIL PAN PLUG, OPEN AND ALLOW TO DRAIN INTO THE FUNNEL. TRANSFER WASTE OIL FROM DRUMS TO 500 GALLON WITH OIL TANK IN CONTAINMENT VAULT WITH THE DIAPHRAGM PUMP, WHEN MORE THAN 2 DRUMS ARE FULL. REPLACE PLUG IN OIL PAN. TAKE OFF OIL FILTER, DRAIN INTO FUNNEL AND PLACE IN SEPARATE STEEL WASTE RECEPTACLE WITH SEALED BOTTOM (DRUM OR COVERED DUMPSTER). 11. PLACE ANTIFREEZE DRUM AND FUNNEL UNDER RADIATOR DRAIN PLUG, OPEN AND DRAIN INTO FUNNEL. REPLACE PLUG WHEN FINISHED. TRANSFER WASTE ANTIFREEZE TO PLASTIC TOTE DAILY, 12. CLEAN UP ALL WASTE OIL AND ANTIFREEZE SPILLS IMMEDIATELY WITH GREY ABSORBENT PADS FOLLOWED BY SPEEDI DRI. SOAK UP GASOLINE SPILLS WITH SPEEDI DRI AND SWEEP UP. DISPOSE OF ALL ABSORBENT PADS, SPEEDI DRI AND REGULAR OILY RAGS IN A COVERED STEEL DRUM LABELED OILY SOLIDS. 13. CLEAN UP FUNNELS, TUBES, PUMPS AND WORK AREA DAILY. DO NOT USE THE PUMPS, FUNNELS, DRAW OFF LINES OR DRUMS INTER CHANGEABLY. EACH WASTE STREAM; WASTE OIL, GASOLINE AND ANTIFREEZE MUST HAVE THEIR OWN EQUIPMENT AND APPARATUS. PROCEDIMIENT OS DE ELIMINACI®N DE I iQUID®S A. MIENTRAS EL VEHICULO ESTA EN EL SUELO ABRA LA CAPOTA Y REALICE LAS SIGUIENTES TAREAS; 1. QUITE LA BATERIA Y DEPOSITAR EN EL TANQUE DE ACERO EN FORMA VERTICAL. 2. ABRA EL CILINDRO DEL FRENO Y POMPEAR FUERA EL CONTENIDO CON EL'/d' 0 318"TUBO DE ACERO INOXIDABLE Y LAS POMPAS DE DIAFRAGMA. TRANSFIERA LOS DESECHO DE LIQUIDOS AL TANQUE DE 55 GALON EN RUEDAS. 3. ARRA LAS LINEAE DE LOS FRENO Y TRANSMISION Y POMPEAR EL CONTENIDO AL TANQUE DE COMBUSTIBLE. 4. QUITE EL CONTENEDOR DEL LAVAR LAS VENTANA Y VACIAR EL LIQUIDO EN EL TAMBOR DEL LAVA VENTANA. NO MEZCLE CON EL DESECHO DE COMBUSTIBLE NI EL ANTICONGELANTE. 5. QUITE EL CONTENEDOR DE ANTICONGELANTE EXCESIVO Y VACIAR(0 LA POMPEAR)EN EL TAMBOR DEL ANTICONGELANTE. 6. DESCONECTE Y QUITE LOS INTERRUPTORES DE MERCURIO DE LA CAPOTA Y LA PARTE TRASERA. NO ROMPA LOS CONTENEDORES, LA TRANSFERIR EN UN CUBO DE 55 GAWN EN UN TAMBOR ABIERTO ARRIBA MARCADOS DE DESECHO DE MERCURIO EN EL AREA DE ALMACENAMIENTO DEL GARAJE. USE EL PER16DICO 0 LA BURBUJA ENVUELTA ENTRE CAPAS PARA PREVENIR LA ROMPEDURA. 7. QUITE EL DETONADOR INTERRUPTORES DE LAS BOLSAS DE AIRE,0 DE LA UNIDAD ENTERA Y TRANSFERIR EN UN CUBO A UN CONTENEDOR(CARGA)DEL ALMACENAMIENTO EN EL GARAJE. B. COLOQUE EL VEHICULO EN EL SOPORTE DE VEHICULO PARA DESAGUAR LAS LINEAS Y LOS TANQUES FOR LOS SIGUIENTES PROCEDIMIENTOS; • 8. CORTE LA LINEA DE GASOLINA EN UN PUNTO BAJO Y DESAGUE EL GAS EN UN EMBUDO MONTADO CON CABECILLA SELLAD,A UN TAMBOR FUERTE DE 55 DE GALON. SI EL GAS NO TRANSFIERE LIBREMENTE EN LAS LINEAS DE POMPAS, QUITE EL DEPOSITO DE GASOLINA DE LAS CORREAS DE GANCHO.VIERTA LA GASOLINA FOR EL, LLENE EN EL GAS SOLAMENTE EL TAMBOR DE 55 GALON. MANTENGA LOS TANQUES CERRADO CUANDO NO ESTEN EN USO. LA TRANSFERENCIA DIARIA DE TODO LOS GAS COLECTADO EN EL TANQUE DE ALMACENAJE DOBLE Y SEGURO UTILIZANDO LA POMPA NEUMATICA.AL DESAGUAR LOS TANQUES 0 TRANSFERIR EL GAS EL TRABAJADOR DEBE LLEVAR EL PROTECTOR APROPIADO; UN DELANTAL RESISTENTE A PETROLEO, PROTECTOR DE GUANTES Y CARA. 9. CORTE LAS LINEAS DEL FRENO Y DESAGUE EN EL EMBUDO EN EL TAMBOR DE DESECHO DE PETROLEO. SI LA TRANSMISION TIENE UN WON DEL DESAGUADERO,ABBE Y DESAGUA EL PETROLEO ATRAPADO. 10. EL EMBUDO Y EL TAMBOR DEBAJO EL RADIADOR,ARRA Y PERMITA DESAGUAR EN EL EMBUDO. TRANSFIERA EL DESECHO DE PETROLEO DE LOS TAMBORES A UN TANQUE DE 500 GALON CON CONTENCION DE PETROLEO CON LA POMPAS DE DIAFRAGMA, CUANDO MAS DE 2 TAMBORES ESTAN REPLETO. REEMPLACE WON EN LA CACEROLA DEL PETROLEO. TOME DE FILTRO DE ACEITE, DESAGUAR CON EL EMBUDO Y EL PONER SEPARADO EN UN TAMBOR DE ACERO CON EL FONDO SELLADO(TAMBOR 0 CONTENIDO CUBIERTO). 11. EL TAMBOR DEL ANTICONGELANTE Y EL EMBUDO BAJO EL WON DE DESAGUADERO DEL RADIADOR, ABRA Y DESAGUAR EN EL EMBUDO. REEMPLACE WON CUANDO TERMINE.TRANSFIERA EL DESECHO DE ANTICONGELANTE A LA CUBETA PLASTICA DIARIAMENTE. 12. LIMPIE TODO EL DESECHO DE PETROLEO Y EL ANTICONGELANTE CAIDA INMEDIATAMENTE CON LAS ALMOHADILLAS ABSORBENTES GRISES SEGUIDO USANDO SPEEDI DRI. EMPAPE LA GASOLINA CON SPEEDI DRI BARRER. DESCARGAS DE TODAS ALMOHADILLAS ABSORBENTES,SPEEDI DRI Y LOS PANOS REGULARES EN UN TAMBOR CUBIERTO DE ACERO, MARCADOS SOLIDOS GRASOSO. 13. LIMPIE LOS EMBUDOS, LOS TUBOS, LAS POMPAS Y AREA DE TRABAJO DIARIAMENTE. NO UTILICE LAS POMPAS, LOS EMBUDOS, LINEAS 0 TAMBORES CAMBIABLE MENTE. CADA CARGA DE DESECHO; EL PETROLEO, LA GASOLINA Y EL ANTICONGELANTE DEBEN TENER SU PROPIO EQUIPO Y EL APARATO. SPILL PREVENTION CONTROL PREVENTION •!. ALL WASTE FLUID CONTAINERS AND TANKS MUST BE CAPPED AND CLOSED EXCEPT WHEN FILLING OR EMPTYING. ALL TANKS MUST VENTED TO 12'ABOVE GRADE. 2. ONLY SPECIFIC LABELED CONTAINERS CAN BE USED FOR WASTE FLUID STORAGE. SEPARATE TRANSFER VESSELS, DRUMS, TOTES OR TANKS ARE TO BE USED FOR WASTE OILS (CRANKCASE, TRANSMISSION, POWER STEERING AND BRAKE FLUIDS), GASOLINE,ANTIFREEZE AND WINDSHIELD WASHER. EACH CONTAINER OVER 5 GALLON MUST BE LABELED AS; HAZARDOUS WASTE, MATERIAL, IE. WASTE OIL, HAZARD LEVEL,TOXIC/FLAMMABLE AND HAVE A START DATE. 3. TRANSFER VESSELS AND FLUID STORAGE CONTAINERS SHALL ONLY BE USED ON IMPERVIOUS SURFACES WITH FIRE EXTINGUISHERS AND SPILL CONTROL MATERIALS PRESENT. STORAGE OF MORE THAN 55 GALLON DRUMS MUST BE LOCATED IN A SPILL CONTAINMENT DEVICE, OR BE DOUBLE WALLED AND BE SECURED TO THE BOTTOM TO PREVENT UPLIFT DURING FLOOD EVENTS. THE TANK LOCATION (S) MUST BE FENCED AND PROTECTED BY VEHICLE BARRIERS. 4. VEHICLES SHALL ONLY BE DRAINED OF FLUIDS, CRUSHED AND STORED ON IMPERVIOUS SURFACES WITH CONTAINERS SPILL CONTROL MATERIALS AND FIRE EXTINGUISHERS PRESENT. WRECKED VEHICLES MUST ALSO BE STORED ON AN IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AND ANY DRIPPAGE CLEANED UP IMMEDIATELY. DISCHARGE OF ANY FLUID TO THE GROUND OR WATER IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. CONTROL DURING THE OPERATIONS OF PARTS REMOVAL, FLUID DRAINING AND FLUID TRANSFER SOME SPILLAGE WILL RESULT. ALL SPILLS ARE TO BE CLEANED UP IMMEDIATELY, EVEN IF THEY ARE ON IMPERVIOUS SURFACES, TO PREVENT MIGRATION ON TIRES OR FOOTWEAR. 5 WASTE OIL RELEASES ARE TO BE WIPED UP WITH GREY OR WHITE ABSORBANT PADS, FOLLOWED BY SPEEDI DRY. 7 ANTIFREEZE AND WASHER FLUIDS ARE TO BE WIPED UP WITH THE GREY ABSORBANT PADS. 8. GASOLINE SPILLS ARE TO BE ABSORBED WITH SPEEDI DRI AND SWEPT UP. 9 ACID SPILLS FROM BATTERIES ARE TO BE NEUTRALIZED WITH ALKALY; DRY SODIUM BICARBONATE OR CALCIUM CARBONATE BEFORE MIXING WITH SPEEDI DRY AND BEING SWEPT UP. 10 OIL ABSORBANT PADS, SPEEDI DRY, REGULAR OILY HAND WIPES AND OTHER SOILED MATERIALS MUST BE STORED SEPARATELY IN A HD-16 BOLT AND RING COVERED STEEL DRUM FOR DISPOSAL AS A HAZARDOUS WASTE. 11 ALL FUNNELS, TOOLS, PUMPS, PAILS, TUBING AND WORK SURFACES ARE TO BE WIPED CLEAN AT THE END OF EVERY WORK DAY AND STORED IN A COVERED ENCLOSURE. PERSONNEL INVOLVED IN THE SPILL CLEAN UP OR TRANSFER OF GASOLINE, WASTE OIL, ETC. INTO LARGER CONTAINERS ARE REQUIRED TO WEAR PROTECTIVE CLOTHING. THE WORKER MUST WEAR AN OIL/GAS PROTECTIVE APRON (HYCAR, PVC OR NEOPRENE), RUBBER GLOVES(NITRILE OR NEOPRENE)AND A FACE MASK. THE FLUIDS STORAGE AREAS MUST HAVE EYE WASH STATIONS, FIRE EXTINGUISHERS, SPILL CONTROL MATERIALS AND A FULL FACE RESPIRATOR AVAILABLE. CONTROL DE P VNCION DEI. DERPIAMAMIENTO PREVENc1®N • TODO DESECHO CONTENEDORES Y TANQUES LIQUIDOS SE DEBEN TAPADO Y CERRADOS AL LLENAR 0 VACIAR. TODOS LOS TANQUES DEBEN DE SER DESCARGADO A LLEGAR A 12'GRADO. 2. SOLO LOS TANQUES MARCADOS ESPECIFICAMENTE PUEDEN SER UTILIZADO PARA EL DESECHO ALMACENAMIENTO LIQUIDO. SEPARE LOS TANQUES QUE DEBERAN SER UTILIZADOS PARA EL DESECHO DE PETROLEOS, EJEMPLO: (LIQUIDOS DE TRANSMISION, MOTOR Y FRENOS), LA GASOLINA,EL ANTICONGELANTE Y EL LAVA PARABRISAS.CADA TANQUE SOBRE 5 GAL®N TIENE QUE SER MARCADO COMO; DESECHO PELIGROSO MATERIALES AL IGUAL EL DESECHO DE PETR®LEO,TOXICO/INFLAMABLE YDERE TENER LA FECHA DE ALMACENAMIENTO. 3. CARGA DE EMBARCAC16N Y CONTENEDORES DE LIQUIDOS SOLO SERAN UTILIZADO EN SUPERFICIES INSENSIBLES CON APAGADORES DE FUEGO Y LOS MATERIALES DEL CONTROL DE DERRAMAMIENTO PRESENTS. EL ALMACENAMIENTO DE TANQUES DE 55 GALON DEBEN DE SER LOCALIZADO EN UN DISPOSITiVO DE CONTENCiON,0 DEBEN DE SER DOBLE CERCADO Y ASEGURADO AL FONDO PARA PREVENIR SUSTENTAC16N DURANTE ACONTECIMIENTOS DE INUNDACI®N. LA UBICACI®N DE LOS TANQUE SE DEBE CERCAR Y SER PROTEGIDA POR BARRERAS DE VEHICULO. 4. LOS VEHICULOS DEBEN DE SER SOLO DESAGUADO DE LIQUIDOS,APLASTADOS Y ALMACENADOS EN SUPERFICIES INSENSIBLES CON TANQUES,APAGADORES DE FUEGO Y LOS MATERIALES DEL CONTROL DE DERRAMAMIENTO PRESENTE. LOS VEHICULOS APLASTADOS DEBEN SER TAMBIEN ALMACENADOS EN SUPERFICIE INSENSIBLE Y CUALQUIER DESCARGA DEBE SER INMEDIATAMENTE LIMPIADA. LA DESCARGA DE LIQUIDO AL SUELO 0 EL AGUA ES ESTRICTAMENTE PROHIBIDO. CONTROL • DURANTE LAS OPERACIONES DE LA ELIMINACION DE PARTES REMOVIDA, DESAGUE DE LIQUIDO Y TRANSFERI MENTO DE LIQUIDOS PUDE SURGIR ALGUN DERRAME. TODAS DESCARGA DEBERAN DE SER LIMPIADAS INMEDIATAMENTE, INCLUSO SI ELLOS ESTAN EN SUPERFICIES INSENSIBLES, PARA PREVENIR LA MIGRACI®N EN LLANTAS 0 CALZADO. 6. EL DESAGUE DEL PETR®LEO DEBERAN SER LIMPIADAS CON ALMOHADILLAS ABSORBENTE GRISES 0 BLANCAS, SEGUIDO USANDO EL PRODUCTO SPEEDI DRY. 7. LOS LIQUIDOS DEL ANTICONGELANTE Y EL LAVA PARABRISAS DEBERAN SER LIMPIADOS CON LAS ALMOHADILLAS ABSORBENTS GRISES 0 BLANCA 8. EL DESAGUE DE GASOLINA DEBERAN DE SER ABSORBIDO CON SPEEDI DRI Y SER BARRIDO 9. EL DESAGUE DE ACIDO DE BATERIAS DEBERAN SER NEUTRALIZADOS CON ALKALY; BICARBONATO SECO DE CALCIO 0 CARBONATO DE CALCIO ANTES DE MEZCLARSE CON SPEEDI DRY Y ANTES DE SER BARRIDO. 10. ALMOHADILLAS ABSORBENTE, SPEEDI DRY, GRASA REGULARES PARA LAS MANOS, Y OTROS MATERIAS DEBERAN DE SER ALMACENADO SEPARADAMENTE EN UN TANQUE HD-16 Y EL TANQUE DEBE DE SER CUBIERTO CON EL ANILLO DE ACERO PARA LA DISPOSIC16N COMO UN DESECHO PELIGROSO. 11. TODOS LOS INSTRUMENTOS, LAS HERRAMIENTA, LAS POMPAS, LA TUBERIA Y TODOS RELACIONADO CON EL TRABAJO DE13ERAN SER ENJUGADOS, LIMPIOS A FINAL DE CADA JORNADA DE TRABAJO Y ALMACENADOS EN UN TANQUE CERRADO 12. EL PERSONAL INVOLUCRADO EN LA LIMPIEZA DEL DESAGUE 0 LA TRANSFERENCIA DE GASOLINA, DESECHO DE PETROLEO, ETC. EN CONTENEDORES MAS GRANDE SON REQUERIDOS A TENER ROPA PROTECTORA. EL + TRABAJADOR DEBE LLEVAR UN DELANTAL PROTECTOR DE PETROLEO/GAS(HYLAR, PVC 0 NEOPRENE), GUANTES DE PLASTICOS(NITRILE 0 NEOPRENE)Y UNA MASCARILLA. LAS AREAS DEL ALMACENAMIENTO DE LIQUIDOS DEBEN TENER UNA ESTACIONES DEL LAVADO DE OJO, LOS APAGADORES DE FUEGO, LOS MATERIALES DE CONTROL Y UN RESPIRADOR REPLETO DE LA CARA. FLUIDS REMOVAL CHECKLIST MAKE, YEAR, COLOR, DATE, INITIALS BRAKE POWER TRANS. CRANK- GASOLINE ANTI- WASHE BATTERY AIR ~MERCURY _ STEERING MISSION CASE TANK FREEZE R FLUID BAC SWITCH a RECEIVED OCT 1 .8 2007 fit D ENGINEERING, INC. DEPT. OF PLANNING& CDMMUNaTY DEVELOPMENT P.O. Box 848• Salem, Massachusetts 01970 •Telephone: 978-745-4569 • Fax: 978-745-4881 October 14,2007 Gary Bogue Department of Environmental Protection Wetlands Department 205B Lowell Street Wilmington,MA. 01887 Re: A&H Auto Exchanm 15 Robinson Road,Salem,NOI#64426 Dear Mr. Bogue, I have prepared this correspondence to request a modification to the NOI application dated January 25, 2007,that was resubmitted with Hancock Survey for A&H Auto Exchange. Hancock Survey had compiled the topographic data, defined the subcatchments and analysis points,prepared a Hydrocad i modeling of Stormwater generation and designed a detention pond in accordance with the BMP standards. The Plans, specifications,maintenance manual and Stormwater Management Forms were "i prepared and stamped by a licensed professional engineer from Hancock Survey, Vaclav Talacko, PE #34026. The Conservation Commission still had concerns with the revised application as stated in the June 15, 2007 letter to DEP. I believe the two main issues that need to be resolved are the outfall configuration and the amount of runoff contribution from the North(right)upper yard. I visited the site during a rain event this month and observed the runoff from the lower part of the road going to the pond area,but the rest of the yard (north)is exiting elsewhere. Greater delineation would not be helpful as the detention pond has been designed as large as possible in the space available. The truck scale has been removed, so ramp construction is not part of this application. Instead of a 36"outfall pipe discharging to the stream we are proposing a steel 45° v-notch weir and surface baffle before the 36"pipe to moderate flows for the first two feet of depth. After two feet the water flows directly to the pipe. These structures are used extensively in wastewater treatment systems, irrigation ponds and reservoirs to control flow and allow flow measurement. The pipe will be encased in a 6' high x 10' wide x 1' thick concrete headwall backed up by rip-rap on the stream side and embedded into the pond berms. This will provide structural support for the control apparatus during violent storm '- events, a concern of the Con. Com. as well. The weir and baffle will be anchored into the wall as shown in the attached detail sheets. The weir has a maximum flow rate of 6.43 CFS and will contain a ten year storm event. A 25 year storm event will flow 0.25' over the weir directly into the 36"pipe. The Hydrocad analysis shows the water elevation at 82.00(outlet 164°weir) during a 100 year storm event. Table 1 contains the Pre and Post flows with the 36"pipe and the proposed 45°v-notch weir. The flow rates through the proposed weir are greater than 50%less than the 36"pipe discharge and will provide greater protection to the wetlands and prevent flooding. This provides the greatest detention time and will hold a 20- 25 year event before overflowing the weir. The Hydrocad analysis for the revised design is attached. The only modification to the NOI application is the proposed weir and control structure,all other aspects of the Stormwater Management Form, design and plans remain the same. While finances have been an issue,the client would request an Order of Conditions from DEP in order to begin the pond, swale and berm construction this fall. Please call if you have any questions. Very truly yours SP Engineering, Inc. $A fc'� • Bruce M. Poole President cc Carey Duques, Salem Conservation Commission • TABLE 1 PRE AND POST FLOWS, 10/2007 A&H AUTO EXCHANGE Storm event Pre-existing Hancock Pipe Proposed Weir 2-Year 6.94 CFS 4.98 * 0.93t 10-Year 13.44 9.84 4.41 25-Year 18.09 14.53 7.25 100-Year 28.66 24.09 10.96 * From page 1-2 of the Hancock Survey Stormwater Management Form submitted Feb. 1, 2007 t Revised SP Inc. Hydrocad analysis with 451 v-notch weir 6'x /O'x /' C0,11Ce67;-C OUTFALL 5T,PL/C7-U,eE 0 1I 3" f3,P.4CE 36" SDP 35 �BAFFL -� I�O '� _3E,4D wBL P/PE I I �6� -8 °il -3 � iI I 45'WE/Q i — — — Ilo Ilo ab6' II II II -so o. C. ©II �WEie II o 01 o Il 0 II / s�8n�� /'D.C. II II - 79 ° _ I- - o 0 0 0 o I , - - - --� �� — - - - -78 C2)3"x3X3/8L POND $OT7"OM 77 QT WE/.e� DETENTION POND OUTFALL CONTROL STRUCTURE SCALE: 1" = I ' • - , • CONC.PETE NE.4Dl�/.4L C 9;K3 0>1 3/s ,Pfl CE TY� TOP G TOTE �• A L L AN4L E 5 TO BE SU�PFACE 8/5 �� x3"x 3/B ' BAFFLE Z BAFFLE ANO WE/� -8 4 '0 8� 7-0 ,&Z 3//6- COLD .eOLLEO STEEL I OUTLET o SDR 3' i 3, ALL h/ELDEO 36 V-NO7-C11 I 80 40"aC C O/YST�PdC T/ON - � ► 79 C�s eor B.P.9CE VZ„ pct 71 ELEt/,QT/ON' L Ems, CROSS SECTION A -A SCALE : I " = I' . 2S (Subcat 2 car sto e+ _ road _p 1 �� 2R (new Link) • Zp — 1'R culvert under Robinson 4S. road Pond 2 Culvert to brook (stream to prop line Subcat 1 Operations I R 3Sli�rge+infiltrators Impervious Liner +infiltrators • Subeat Reach on LIf1k= Drainage Diagram for Hancock pond V weir 10-07Dev A+H Auto 2 yrs O a Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. 10/12/2007 HydroCAD®8.00 sin 002234 0 2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hancock pond V weir 10w=ev A +H Auto 2 yrs • Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 2 HydroCAD®8.00 s/n 002234 ©2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/12/2007 Area Listing (all nodes) Area (acres) CN Description (subcats) 0.540 55 Woods,good, HSG B (1S) 0.056 61 >75% Grass cover, good, HSG B (1 S) 0.410 61 >75% Grass cover, good, hsg B (2S) 0.103 79 <50% Grass cover, poor, HSG B (2S) 2.320 82 Dirt Roads, HSG B (1S) 0.330 82 Dirt roads, HSG B (2S) 1.130 85 Gravel roads, HSG B (1S,2S) 0.230 98 HDPE liner (3S) • 0.126 98 Paved parking + roofs (1S,2S) 0.046 98 concrete pad + trailers (3S) 5.291 • Hancock pond V weir 10-07Dev A +H Auto 2 yrs Type Ill 24-hr 2 Year Rainfall=3.16" • Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 3 HydroCADS 8.00 s/n 002234 ©2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/12/2007 Time span=1.00-24.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 461 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: Subcat 1 Operations Runoff Area=3.849 ac Runoff Depth>1.30" Flow Length=601' Tc=28.0 min CN=79 Runoff=3.37 cfs 0.416 of Subcatchment 2S: (Subcat 2 car storage+ road Runoff Area=1.166 ac Runoff Depth>1.12" Flow Length=504' Tc=6.0 min CN=76 Runoff=1.46 cfs 0.109 of Subcatchment 3S: Impervious Liner+infiltrators Runoff Area=0.276 ac Runoff Depth>2.93" Flow Length=120' Slope=0.0100'/' Tc=6.3 min CN=98 Runoff=0.82 cfs 0.067 of Reach 1R: Culvert to brook Avg. Depth=0.22' Max Vel=4.08 fps Inflow=0.93 cfs 0.361 of D=36.0" n=0.011 L=40.0' S=0.0125 'P Capacity=88.13 cfs Outflow=0.93 cfs 0.360 of Reach 2R: (stream to prop line Avg. Depth=0.07' Max Vel=3.23 fps Inflow=0.93 cfs 0.360 of n=0.025 L=460.0' S=0.0100 '/' Capacity=47.66 cfs Outflow=0.93 cfs 0.360 of Reach 3R: culvert under Robinson road Avg. Depth=0.22' Max Vel=4.92 fps Inflow=0.93 cfs 0.360 of D=24.0" n=0.011 L=30.0' S=0.0183 '/' Capacity=36.20 cfs Outflow=0.93 cfs 0.360 of • Pond 1P: liner storge+ infiltrators Peak EIev=105.68' Storage=0.025 of Inflow=0.82 cfs 0.067 of Discarded=0.08 cfs 0.067 of Primary=0.00 cfs 0.000 of Oufflow=0.08 cfs 0.067 of Pond 2P: Pond 2 Peak EIev=79.70' Storage=0.247 of Inflow=3.95 cfs 0.526 of Primary=0.93 cfs 0.361 of Secondary=0.00 cfs 0.000 of Outflow=0.93 cfs 0.361 of Link 1L: (new Link) Inflow=0.93 cfs 0.360 of Primary--0.93 cfs 0.360 of Total Runoff Area= 5.291 ac Runoff Volume= 0.593 of Average Runoff Depth= 1.34" 92.40% Pervious Area=4.889 ac 7.60% Impervious Area= 0.402 ac • Hancock pond V weir 10-0710ev A +H Auto 2 yrs Type 11124-hr 2 Year Rainfall=3.16" Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 4 HydroCAD®8.00 s/n 002234 ©2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/12/2007 Subcatchment 1S: Subcat 1 Operations Runoff = 3.37 cfs @ 12.41 hrs, Volume= 0.416 af, Depth> 1.30" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr 2 Year Rainfall=3.16" Area (ac) CN Description 0.043 98 Paved parking + roofs 0.540 55 Woods,good, HSG B 0.890 85 Gravel roads, HSG B 2.320 82 Dirt Roads, HSG B 0.056 61 >75% Grass cover, good, HSG B 3.849 79 Weighted Average 3.806 Pervious Area 0.043 Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (fUft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 23.4 75 0.0379 0.05 Sheet Flow, Subcat 1 dev A+H operations Woods: Dense underbrush n= 0.800 P2= 3.10" • 2.0 116 0.0379 0.97 Shallow Concentrated Flow, SC 1 dev roadway Woodland Kv= 5.0 fps 2.6 410 0.0260 2.60 Shallow Concentrated Flow, unpaved road Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps 28.0 601 Total Subcatchment 1S: Subcat 1 Operations Hydrograph D Runoff 3.]ch®1261 An Type 11124-hr 2 Year 3- Rainfall=3.16" Runoff Area=3.849 ac Runoff Volume=0.416 of 2 Runoff Depth>1.30" Flow Length=601' Tc=28.0 min CN--79 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (horns) Hancock pond V weir 10-07Dev A +H Auto 2 yrs Type 111 24-hr 2 Year Rainfall=3.16" Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 5 HydroCAD®8.00 s/n 002234 ©2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/12/2007 Subcatchment 2S: (Subcat 2 car storage + road Runoff = 1.46 cfs @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 0.109 af, Depth> 1.12" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr 2 Year Rainfall=3.16" Area (ac) CN Description 0.410 61 >75% Grass cover, good, hsg B 0.330 82 Dirt roads, HSG B 0.240 85 Gravel roads, HSG B 0.083 98 Paved parking + roofs 0.103 79 <50% Grass cover, poor, HSG B 1.166 76 Weighted Average 1.083 Pervious Area 0.083 Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (f/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 2.5 75 0.0400 0.50 Sheet Flow, sc 2 car storage Fallow n= 0.050 P2= 3.10" • 0.6 202 0.1336 5.88 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Ditch beside road Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps 2.5 227 0.0090 1.53 Shallow Concentrated Flow, swale gully Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps 0.4 Direct Entry, rip-rap 6.0 504 Total } • Hancock pond V weir 10-07Dev A +H Auto 2 yrs Type ///24-hr 2 Year Rainfall=3.16" Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 6 HydroCAD®8.00 s/n 002234 ©2006 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/12/2007 Subcatchment 2S: (Subcat 2 car storage + road Hydrograph pp Runoff t.M Ca®12.10 h. Type III 24-hr 2 Year Rainfall=3.16" Runoff Area=1.166 ac Runoff Volume=0.109 of Runoff Depth>1.12" LL Flow Length=504' Tc=6.0 min CN=76 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 9 10 it 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) • Hancock pond V weir 10-07Dev A +H Auto 2 yrs Type 111 24-hr 2 Year Rainfall=3.16" Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 7 HydroCAD®8.00 s/n 002234 m 2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/12/2007 Subcatchment 3S: Impervious Liner +infiltrators Runoff = 0.82 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.067 af, Depth> 2.93" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr 2 Year Rainfall=3.16" Area (ac) CN Description 0.230 98 HDPE liner 0.046 98 cOncrete pad +trailers 0.276 98 Weighted Average 0.276 Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.3 120 0.0100 0.32 Sheet Flow, liner covered with 2'stone Fallow n= 0.050 P2= 3.10" Subcatchment 3S: Impervious Liner+infiltrators Hydrograph • 0.9 p Runoff 0.85. o.azar tzos nrs 0.8= Type III 24-hr 2 Year 0.75 0.7= Rainfall=3.16" 0.65= Runoff Area=0.276 ac 05 6.55 Runoff Volume=0.067 of 0.54 Runoff Depth>2.93" 0.4 - 0.4. Flow Length=120' u 0.35 0.3_ Slope=0.0100 '/' 0.25 Tc=6.3 min 0.2. 0.15_ CN=98 0.1. 0.05. 0- ........ ............... .... 1 2 3.,. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) • Hancock pond V weir 10-07Dev A +H Auto 2 yrs Type 111 24-hr 2 Year Rainfall=3.16" • Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 8 HydroCAD®8.00 s/n 002234 ©2006 HydrOCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/12/2007 Reach 1 R: Culvert to brook [52] Hint: Inlet conditions not evaluated Inflow Area = 5.291 ac, Inflow Depth > 0.82" for 2 Year event Inflow = 0.93 cfs @ 13.26 hrs, Volume= 0.361 of Outflow = 0.93 cfs @ 13.27 hrs, Volume= 0.360 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.4 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Max. Velocity=4.08 fps, Min. Travel Time= 0.2 min Avg. Velocity = 2.96 fps, Avg. Travel Time= 0.2 min Peak Storage= 9 cf @ 13.26 hrs, Average Depth at Peak Storage= 0.22' Bank-Full Depth= 3.00', Capacity at Bank-Full= 88.13 cfs 36.0" Diameter Pipe, n= 0.011 Length=40.0' Slope= 0.0125 '/' Inlet Invert= 78.50', Outlet Invert= 78.00' 0• Reach 1 R: Culvert to brook Hydrograph €�Inflow 1 a.W M 1323 hB 113 OLd low Inflow Area=5.291 0.83 h01327 hrs Avg. Depth=0.22' Max Vel=4.08 fps D=36.0" n=0.011 L=40.0' S=0.0125 '/' Capacity=88.13 cfs • 04 5 .. .. . . .. . . . . 1 2 3 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 1'7 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (houm) a Hancock pond V weir 10-07Dev A +H Auto 2 yrs Type 11124-hr 2 Year Rainfall=3.16" Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 9 HydroCAD®8.00 s/n 002234 ©2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/12/2007 Reach 2R: (stream to prop line Inflow Area = 5.291 ac, Inflow Depth > 0.82" for 2 Year event Inflow = 0.93 cfs @ 13.27 hrs, Volume= 0.360 of Outflow = 0.93 cfs @ 13.35 hrs, Volume= 0.360 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 5.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Max. Velocity= 3.23 fps, Min. Travel Time= 2.4 min Avg. Velocity = 3.23 fps, Avg. Travel Time= 2.4 min Peak Storage= 132 cf @ 13.31 hrs, Average Depth at Peak Storage= 0.07' Bank-Full Depth= 2.00', Capacity at Bank-Full=47.66 cfs Custom stage-perimeter table, n= 0.025 Intermediate values determined by Linear interpolation Length=460.0' Slope= 0.0100 'P Inlet Invert= 77.00', Outlet Invert= 72.38' • Depth End Area Perim. Storage Discharge (feet) (sq-ft) (feet) (cubic-feet) (cfs) 0.00 0.0 0.0 0 0.00 0.50 2.0 5.0 920 6.47 1.00 4.0 6.0 1,840 18.18 1.50 6.0 7.0 2,760 32.25 2.00 8.0 8.0 3,680 47.66 • Hancock pond V weir 10-0710ev A +H Auto 2 yrs Type 11124-hr 2 Year Rainfall=3.16" • Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 10 HydroCAD®8.00 s/n 002234 ©2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10112/2007 Reach 2R: (stream to prop line Hydrograph - . ®Inflow 1 0.93 cf5 @ 1121 hrs ®OUIflOW Inflow Area=5.291 G.WMaI3-"h. Avg. Depth=0.07' Max Vel=3.23 fps n=0.025 3 L=460.0' e LL S=0.0100 or Capacity=47.66 cfs • 7 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) • } 1 Hancock pond V weir 10-07Dev A +H Auto 2 yrs Type 111 24-hr 2 Year Rainfall=3.16" Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 11 HydroCAD®8.00 s/n 002234 ©2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/12/2007 Reach 3R: culvert under Robinson road [52] Hint: Inlet conditions not evaluated [61] Hint: Submerged 5% of Reach 2R bottom Inflow Area = 5.291 ac, Inflow Depth > 0.82" for 2 Year event Inflow = 0.93 cfs @ 13.35 hrs, Volume= 0.360 of Outflow = 0.93 cfs @ 13.35 hrs, Volume= 0.360 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.2 min Routing by Stor-Intl+Trans method, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Max. Velocity=4.92 fps, Min. Travel Time= 0.1 min Avg. Velocity = 3.58 fps, Avg. Travel Time= 0.1 min Peak Storage= 6 cf @ 13.35 hrs, Average Depth at Peak Storage= 0.22' Defined Flood Depth= 76.00', Capacity at Flood Depth= -5,584.15 cfs Bank-Full Depth= 2.00', Capacity at Bank-Full= 36.20 cfs 24.0" Diameter Pipe, n= 0.011 Length= 30.0' Slope= 0.0183 '/' Inlet Invert= 72.38', Outlet Invert= 71.83' 0• Reach 3R: culvert under Robinson road Hydrograph ®Inflow 1 o.a is.Mhn MOulflow Inflow Area=5.291 0.0 h@19.9 Avg. Depth=0.22' Max Vel=4.92 fps D=24.0" 4 n=0.011 L=30.0' S=0.0183 '/' Capacity=36.20 cfs • Q ..i...„ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1�8 1�9 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) Hancock pond V weir 10-07Dev A +H Auto 2 yrs Type 11124-hr 2 Year Rainfall=3.16" • Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 12 HydroCAD®8.00 s/n 002234 ©2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/12/2007 Pond 1 P: liner storge + infiltrators Inflow Area = 0.276 ac, Inflow Depth > 2.93" for 2 Year event Inflow = 0.82 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.067 of Outflow = 0.08 cfs @ 12.92 hrs, Volume= 0.067 af, Atten= 91%, Lag= 50.0 min Discarded = 0.08 cfs @ 12.92 hrs, Volume= 0.067 of Primary = 0.00 cfs @ 1.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 105.68' @ 12.92 hrs Surf.Area= 0.036 ac Storage= 0.025 of Plug-Flow detention time= 103.9 min calculated for 0.067 of(100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 102.3 min ( 858.8- 756.5 ) Volume Invert Avail Storage Storage Description #1 105.00' 0.435 of Custom Stage Data(Irregular) Listed below Elevation Surf.Area Perim. Inc.Store Cum.Store Wet.Area (feet) (acres) (feet) (acre-feet) (acre-feet) (acres) 105.00 0.036 160.0 0.000 0.000 0.036 106.00 0.036 160.0 0.036 0.036 0.040 107.00 0.266 400.0 0.133 0.169 0.285 • 108.00 0.266 400.0 0.266 0.435 0.294 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 108.00' 6.0" x 10.0' long Culvert CMP, projecting, no headwall, Ke= 0.900 Outlet Invert= 107.50' S= 0.0500 'P Cc= 0.900 n= 0.011 #2 Discarded 0.00' 2.002 in/hr infiltrators 40 x 40 over Wetted area Discarded OutFlow Max=0.08 cfs @ 12.92 hrs HW=105.68' (Free Discharge) 2=infiltrators 40 x 40 (ExfiItration Controls 0.08 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 1.00 hrs HW=105.00' (Free Discharge) L1=Culvert ( Controls 0.00 cfs) MEN Hancock pond V weir 10-07Dev A +H Auto 2 yrs Type 11124-hr 2 Year Rainfall=3.16" • Prepared by SP Engineering; Inc. Page 13 HydroCAD®8.00 s/n 002234 ©2006 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/12/2007 Pond 1P: liner storge + infiltrators Hydrograph - U Inflow o.e2 crs®�za9 nrs pouf ow Inflow Area=0.276:ac °D1�rded 0.9 - - ©Primary 0.85- 0.8: - Peak Elev=105.68' 0.75 - Storage=0.025 of 0.7. 0.65: 0.6' 0.55. � . u, 0.5. 0450.4 - 0 0.35 0.3=®. 0.25 0.15 oo o- 0_00a:osa an12®921zAn92 nn r nn 0 , 12 345 67 8 910 11 1273 14 15 16 17 98 19 20 27 22 23 24 • Time (hours) • Hancock pond V weir 10-07Dev A +H Auto 2 yrs Type /it 24-hr 2 Year Rainfall=3.16" Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 14 HydroCADO 8.00 s/n 002234 ©2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/12/2007 Pond 2P: Pond 2 Inflow Area = 5.291 ac, Inflow Depth > 1.19" for 2 Year event Inflow = 3.95 cfs @ 12.38 hrs, Volume= 0.526 of Outflow = 0.93 cfs @ 13.26 hrs, Volume= 0.361 af, Atten= 76%, Lag= 53.0 min Primary = 0.93 cfs @ 13.26 hrs, Volume= 0.361 of Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 1.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 79.70' @ 13.26 hrs Surf.Area= 0.000 ac Storage= 0.247 of Flood Elev= 82.00' Surf.Area= 0.000 ac Storage= 0.731 of Plug-Flow detention time= 222.1 min calculated for 0.361 of(69% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 121.1 min ( 982.7- 861.6 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 78.00' 0.981 of Custom Stage Data Listed below Elevation Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (acre-feet) (acre-feet) 78.00 0.000 0.000 79.00 0.134 0.134 • 80.00 0.162 0.296 81.00 0.195 0.491 82.00 0.240 0.731 83.00 0.250 0.981 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Secondary 82.00' 164.8 deg x 15.0' long Sharp-Crested Vee/Trap Weir C= 2.47 #2 Primary 78.75' 45.0 deg x 2.00' rise Sharp-Crested Vee/Trap Weir C= 2.56 PrimaryOutFlow Max=0.93 cfs @ 13.26 hrs HW=79.70' (Free Discharge) t--2--Sharp-Crested Vee/Trap Weir (Weir Controls 0.93 cfs @ 2.49 fps) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 1.00 hrs HW=78.00' (Free Discharge) t-1=Sharp-Crested Vee/Trap Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) • Hancock pond V weir 10-07Dev A +H Auto 2 yrs Type Ill 24-hr 2 Year Rainfall=3.16" Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 15 HydroCAD®8.00 s/n 002234 ©2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/12/2007 Pond 2P: Pond 2 Hydrograph �7 Infloiw J.95 ds®1238 nrs i]OU1. M Inflow Area=5.291 ac "Secondary 4 Peak Elev=79.70' Storage=0.247 of 3 3 ° 2' LL X0.93 cfs®13.S Ms�� - 0.83 1320 nrs 1- 0 , • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) t Hancock pond V weir 10-07Dev A +H Auto 2 yrs Type 11124-hr 2 Year Rainfall=3.16" • Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 16 HydroCAD®8.00 s/n 002234 ©2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/12/2007 Link 1 L: (new Link) Inflow Area= 5.291 ac, Inflow Depth > 0.82" for 2 Year event Inflow = 0.93 cfs @ 13.35 hrs, Volume= 0.360 of Primary = 0.93 cfs @ 13.35 hrs, Volume= 0.360 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary outflow= Inflow, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Link 1 L: (new Link) Hydrograph fa hiflow 1 0.93 m g ia.M hn I p Primary Inflow Area=5.291 O.W� "Wh. u 3 • LL 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 2,2 23 24 Time (hours) • zs (Subcat 2 car sto e+ road L'., —p 3R 2R (new Link) 2P �{� 1 R' culvert under Robinson (stream to prop line road Pond 2 Culvert to brook Subcat 1 Operations /A -1.P�- . 3$ liner storge+infiltrators Impervious Liner +infiltrators • Su6cat Reach _On L(f.1k; Drainage Diagram for Hancock pond V weir 10-07Dev A+H Auto 100 yrs O a Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. 10/12/2007 - HydmCADS 8.00 s/n 002234 ®2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC . Hancock pond V weir 10-07Dev A +H Auto 100 yrs Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 2 HydroCAD®8.00 s/n 002234 ©2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/12/2007 Area Listing (all nodes) Area (acres) CN Description (subcats) 0.540 55 Woods,good, HSG B (1S) 0.056 61 >75% Grass cover, good, HSG B (1S) 0.410 61 >75% Grass cover, good, hsg B (2S) 0.103 79 <50% Grass cover, poor, HSG B (2S) 2.320 82 Dirt Roads, HSG B (1S) 0.330 82 Dirt roads, HSG B (2S) 1.130 85 Gravel roads, HSG B (1S,2S) 0.230 98 HDPE liner (3S) • 0.126 98 Paved parking + roofs (1S,2S) 0.046 98 concrete pad +trailers (3S) 5.291 • Hancock pond V weir 10-07Dev A +H Auto 100 yrs Type 11124-hr 100 Year Rainfall=8.47" • Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 3 HydroCADO 8.00 s/n 002234 0 2006 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/12/2007 Time span=1.00-24.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 461 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: Subcat 1 Operations Runoff Area=3.849 ac Runoff Depth>5.92" Flow Length=601' Tc=28.0 min CN=79 Runoff=15.44 cfs 1.898 of Subcatchment 2S: (Subcat 2 car storage+ road Runoff Area=1.166 ac Runoff Depth>5.58" Flow Length=504' Tc=6.0 min CN=76 Runoff=7.42 cfs 0.542 of Subcatchment 3S: Impervious Liner+infiltrators Runoff Area=0.276 ac Runoff Depth>8.22" Flow Length=120' Slope=0.01007' Tc=6.3 min CN=98 Runoff=2.23 cfs 0.189 of Reach 1'R: Culvert to brook Avg. Depth=0.71' Max Vel=8.50 fps Inflow=10.97 cfs 2.236 of D=36.0" n=0.011 L=40.0' S=0.0125'P Capacity=88.13 cfs Outflow=10.97 cfs 2.235 of Reach 2R: (stream to prop line Avg. Depth=0.69' Max Vel=3.96 fps Inflow=10.97 cfs 2.235 of n=0.025 L=460.0' S=0.0100'P Capacity=47.66 cfs Outflow=10.96 cfs 2.233 of Reach 3R: culvert under Robinson road Avg. Depth=0.75' Max Vel=10.10 fps Inflow=10.96 cfs 2.233 of 0=24.0" n=0.011 L=30.0' S=0.0183 '1' Capacity=36.20 cfs Outflow=10.96 cfs 2.233 of • Pond 1P: liner storge+ infiltrators Peak EIev=106.34' Storage=0.082 of Inflow=2.23 cfs 0.189 of Discarded=0.25 cfs 0.172 of Primary=0.00 cfs 0.000 of Outflow=0.25 cfs 0.172 of Pond 2P: Pond 2 Peak EIev=82.01' Storage=0.735 of Inflow=18.16 cfs 2.441 of Primary=10.97 cfs 2.236 of Secondary=0.15 cfs 0.001 of Outflow=11.13 cfs 2.237 of Link 1 L: (new Link) Inflow=10.96 cfs 2.233 of Primary=10.96 cfs 2.233 of Total Runoff Area= 5.291 ac Runoff Volume=2.630 of Average Runoff Depth = 5.96" 92.40% Pervious Area=4.889 ac 7.60% Impervious Area= 0.402 ac • Hancock pond V weir 10-07Dev A +H Auto 100 yrs Type 111 24-hr 100 Year Rainfall=8.47" • Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 4 HydroCAD®8.00 s/n 002234 ©2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/12/2007 Subcatchment 1S: Subcat 1 Operations Runoff = 15.44 cfs @ 12.38 hrs, Volume= 1.898 af, Depth> 5.92" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr 100 Year Rainfall=8.47" Area (ac) CN Description 0.043 98 Paved parking + roofs 0.540 55 Woods,good, HSG B 0.890 85 Gravel roads, HSG B 2.320 82 Dirt Roads, HSG B 0.056 61 >75% Grass cover, good HSG B 3.849 79 Weighted Average 3.806 Pervious Area 0.043 Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 23.4 75 0.0379 0.05 Sheet Flow, Subcat 1 dev A+H operations Woods: Dense underbrush n= 0.800 P2= 3.10" • 2.0 116 0.0379 0.97 Shallow Concentrated Flow, SC 1 dev roadway Woodland Kv= 5.0 fps 2.6 410 0.0260 2.60 Shallow Concentrated Flow, unpaved road Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps 28.0 601 Total Subcatchment 1S: Subcat 1 Operations Hydrograph 17- 16- F16= C15.aa crs ize nB 15 Type III 24-hr 100 Year 14 Rainfall=8.47" 13- 12: Runoff Area=3.849 ac 71 Runoff Volume=1.898 of w 16. Runoff Depth>5.92" Flow Length=601' 7 6- Tc=28:0 min 6 CN=79 4 3 . 2 2- 61 2 34 5 6 .. 7 8. ..9 1,6...11..1,2 ..13 ..14._15. .1 . 17... . :. . 8 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) • Hancock pond V weir 10-07Dev A +H Auto 100 yrs Type 11124-hr 100 Year Rainfall=8.47" Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 5 HydroCAD®8.00 s/n 002234 ©2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/12/2007 Subcatchment 2S: (Subcat 2 car storage + road Runoff = 7.42 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.542 af, Depth> 5.58" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr 100 Year Rainfall=8.47" Area (ac) CN Description 0.410 61 >75% Grass cover, good, hsg B 0.330 82 Dirt roads, HSG B 0.240 85 Gravel roads, HSG B 0.083 98 Paved parking + roofs 0.103 79 <50% Grass cover, poor, HSG B 1.166 76 Weighted Average 1.083 Pervious Area 0.083 Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 2.5 75 0.0400 0.50 Sheet Flow, sc 2 car storage Fallow n= 0.050 P2= 3.10" • 0.6 202 0.1336 5.88 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Ditch beside road Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps 2.5 227 0.0090 1.53 Shallow Concentrated Flow, swale gully Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps 0.4 Direct Entry, rip-rap 6.0 504 Total • Hancock pond V weir 10-07Dev A +H Auto 100 yrs Type 111 24-hr 100 Year Rainfall=8.47" • Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 6 HydroCAD®8.00 s/n 002234 ©2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/12/2007 Subcatchment 2S: (Subcat 2 car storage + road Hydrograph 8 �RunoB _ �.az as®+2oa nrs 7 Type III 24-hr 100 Year Rainfall=8.47" 6 Runoff Area=1.166 ac 5 Runoff Volume=0.542 of Runoff. Depth>5.58" 4 Flow Length=504' 3 Tc=6:0 min 2 CN. =76 yp 01 2 3 4 5 .s. 7 .8...9 .10 ..11Ti 1 (h13 14 15. .2 • 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Hancock pond V weir 10-07Dev A +H Auto 100 yrs Type 111 24-hr 100 Year Rainfall=8.47" • Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 7 HydroCAD®8.00 s/n 002234 ©2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/12/2007 Subcatchment 3S: Impervious Liner+infiltrators Runoff = 2.23 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.189 af, Depth> 8.22" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs - Type III 24-hr 100 Year Rainfall=8.47" Area (ac) CN Description 0.230 98 HDPE liner 0.046 98 concrete pad +trailers 0.276 98 Weighted Average 0.276 Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.3 120 0.0100 0.32 Sheet Flow, liner covered with 2'stone Fallow n= 0.050 P2= 3.10" Subcatchment 3S: Impervious Liner+infiltrators Hydrograph • p Runoff zza crs C izoa nm Type III 24-hr 100 Year 2 Rainfall=8.47" Runoff Area=0.276 ac Runoff Volume=0.189 of 3 Runoff Depth>8.22" LL Flow Length=120' Slope=0.0100 '/' Tc=6.3 min CN=98 o, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 16 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 4 18 26 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) • r Hancock pond V weir 10-0713ev A +H Auto 100 yrs Type 11124-hr 100 Year Rainfall=8.47" • Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 8 HydroCADO 8.00 s/n 002234 ©2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/12/2007 Reach 1 R: Culvert to brook [52] Hint:.lnlet conditions not evaluated [79] Warning: Submerged Pond 2P Primary device#2 by 0.46' Inflow Area = 5.291 ac, Inflow Depth > 5.07" for 100 Year event Inflow = 10.97 cfs @ 12.67 hrs, Volume= 2.236 of Outflow = 10.97 cfs @ 12.67 hrs, Volume= 2.235 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.1 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Max. Velocity= 8.50 fps, Min. Travel Time= 0.1 min Avg. Velocity=4.39 fps, Avg. Travel Time= 0.2 min Peak Storage= 52 cf @ 12.67 hrs, Average Depth at Peak Storage= 0.71' Bank-Full Depth= 3.00', Capacity at Bank-Full= 88.13 cfs 36.0" Diameter Pipe, n= 0.011 Length=40.0' Slope= 0.0125 '/' Inlet Invert= 78.50', Outlet Invert= 78.00' Reach 1 R: Culvert to brook Hydrograph ®Inflow 12 10. d.0 1z67 hrs ED Outflow 11- Inflow Area=5.291 10: Avg. Depth=0.71' 97 Max Vel=8.50 fps D=36.0" ' n=0.011 3 6. rJ_ ° L=40.0' LL a- S=0.0125 '/' 3- Capacity=88.13 cfs 2 0 i 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) 3 Hancock pond V weir 10-07Dev A +H Auto 100 yrs Type 111 24-hr 100 Year Rainfall=8.47" . Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 9 HydroCADO 8.00 sin 002234 ©2006 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/12/2007 Reach 2R: (stream to prop line Inflow Area = 5.291 ac, Inflow Depth > 5.07" for 100 Year event Inflow = 10.97 cfs @ 12.67 hrs, Volume= 2.235 of Outflow = 10.96 cfs @ 12.72 hrs, Volume= 2.233 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 3.3 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Max. Velocity= 3.96 fps, Min. Travel Time= 1.9 min Avg. Velocity = 3.28 fps, Avg.Travel Time= 2.3 min Peak Storage= 1,273 cf @ 12.69 hrs, Average Depth at Peak Storage= 0.69' Bank-Full Depth= 2.00', Capacity at Bank-Full= 47.66 cfs Custom stage-perimeter table, n= 0.025 Intermediate values determined by Linear interpolation Length=460.0' Slope= 0.0100 '/' Inlet Invert= 77.00', Outlet Invert= 72.38' • Depth End Area Perim. Storage Discharge (feet) (sq-ft) (feet) (cubic-feet) (cfs) 0.00 0.0 0.0 0 0.00 0.50 2.0 5.0 920 6.47 1.00 4.0 6.0 1,840 18.18 1.50 6.0 7.0 2,760 32.25 2.00 8.0 8.0 3,680 47.66 • Hancock pond V weir 10-07Dev A +H Auto 100 yrs Type 111 24-hr 100 Year Rainfall=8.47" • Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 10 HydroCAD®8.00 s/n 002234 ©2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/12/2007 Reach 2R: (stream to prop line Hydrograph ®Inflow 12= ios7m®+zeTnn I- ®Outflow Inflow Area=5.2 io es rs�izn nn 10- Avg.'Depth=0.69'. 9- Max Vel i3.96 fps 6 .8 _ n=0.025 7 6_ L=460,0' 5 S=0.0100 '= Capacity-47.66 ds 3 2_ • Oi . 2 3 4 5 6 , 7, 8 9 10 11 1 12 13 14 1 5 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time Hours1 • Hancock pond V weir 10-07Dev A +H Auto 100 yrs Type 111 24-hr 100 Year Rainfall=8.47" • Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 11 HydroCAD®8:00 s/n 002234 ©2006 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/12/2007 Reach 3R: culvert under Robinson road [52] Hint: Inlet conditions not evaluated [61] Hint: Submerged 16% of Reach 2R bottom Inflow Area = 5.291 ac, Inflow Depth > 5.06" for 100 Year event Inflow = 10.96 cfs @ 12.72 hrs, Volume= 2.233 of Outflow = 10.96 cfs @ 12.73 hrs, Volume= 2.233 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.1 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Max. Velocity= 10.10 fps, Min. Travel Time= 0.0 min Avg. Velocity = 5.28 fps, Avg. Travel Time= 0.1 min Peak Storage= 33 cf @ 12.73 hrs, Average Depth at Peak Storage= 0.75' Defined Flood Depth= 76.00', Capacity at Flood Depth= -5,584.15 cfs Bank-Full Depth= 2.00', Capacity at Bank-Full= 36.20 cfs 24.0" Diameter Pipe, n= 0.011 Length= 30.0' Slope= 0.0183 ? Inlet Invert= 72.38', Outlet Invert= 71.83' Reach 3R: culvert under Robinson road Hydrograph ®Inflow 12- m.aa rn 012.M nrs E)Outflow 11- Inflow Area=5.291 10= Avg. Depth=0.75' Max Vel=10.10 fps D=24.0" a 7- n=0.011 5: L=30.0' S=0.0183 T 3. Ca pacity=36.20 cfs 2 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 i6 171819 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) r Hancock pond V weir 10-07Dev A +H Auto 100 yrs Type 111 24-hr 100 Year Rainfall=8.47" Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 12 HydroCAD®8.00 s/n 002234 ©2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/12/2007 Pond 1 P: liner storge + infiltrators [82] Warning: Early inflow requires earlier time span Inflow Area = 0.276 ac, Inflow Depth > 8.22" for 100 Year event Inflow = 2.23 cis @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.189 of Outflow = 0.25 cfs @ 12.74 hrs, Volume= 0.172 af, Atten= 89%, Lag= 39.1 min Discarded = 0.25 cis @ 12.74 hrs, Volume= 0.172 of Primary = 0.00 cfs @ 1.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 106.34' @ 12.74 hrs Surf.Area= 0.115 ac Storage= 0.082 of Plug-Flow detention time= 184.7 min calculated for 0.172 of(91% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 138.0 min ( 878.7-740.7 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage.Description #1 105.00' 0.435 of Custom Stage Data (Irregular) Listed below Elevation Surf.Area Perim. Inc.Store Cum.Store Wet.Area (feet) (acres) (feet) (acre-feet) (acre-feet) (acres) • 105.00 0.036 160.0 0.000 0.000 0.036 106.00 0.036 160.0 0.036 0.036 0.040 107.00 0.266 400.0 0.133 0.169 0.285 108.00 0.266 400.0 0.266 0.435 0.294 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 108.00' 6.0" x 10.0' long Culvert CMP, projecting, no headwall, Ke= 0.900 Outlet Invert= 107.50' S= 0.0500 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.011 #2 Discarded 0.00' 2.002 in/hr infikrators 40 x 40 over Wetted area Discarded OutFlow Max=0.25 cfs @ 12.74 hrs HW=106.34' (Free Discharge) t-2=infiltrators 40 x 40 (Exfiltration Controls 0.25 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 1.00 hrs HW=105.00' (Free Discharge) t1=Culvert ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Hancock pond V weir 10-07Dev A +H Auto 100 yrs Type /// 24-hr 100 Year Rainfall=8.47' Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 13 HydroCAD®8.00 s/n 002234 ©2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/12/2007 Pond 1P: liner storge + infiltrators Hydrograph M Inflow 2M5 01ZWhrs I rJ Outflow Inflow Area=0.276 ac IM P„arye° Peak Elev=106.34' 2 Storage=0.082 of 0 LL 1 025 cls 12]4 h. ' ,. o as us®tv4nrs .” 0.00M®100 hrs • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 18 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) Hancock pond V weir 10-07Dev A +H Auto 100 yrs Type 111 24-hr 100 Year Rainfall=8.47" Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 14 HydroCAD®8.00 s/n 002234 ©2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/12/2007 Pond 2P: Pond 2 [95] Warning: Outlet Device#2 rise exceeded [58] Hint: Peaked 0.01' above defined flood level Inflow Area = 5.291 ac, Inflow Depth > 5.54" for 100 Year event Inflow = 18.16 cfs @ 12.35 hrs, Volume= 2.441 of Outflow = 11.13 cfs @ 12.66 hrs, Volume= 2.237 af, Atten= 39%, Lag= 19.0 min Primary = 10.97 cfs @ 12.67 hrs, Volume= 2.236 of Secondary = 0.15 cfs @ 12.66 hrs, Volume= 0.001 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 82.01' @ 12.67 hrs Surf.Area= 0.000 ac Storage= 0.735 of Flood Elev= 82.00' Surf.Area= 0.000 ac Storage= 0.731 of Plug-Flow detention time= 93.0 min calculated for 2.237 of(92% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 51.9 min ( 869.8-817.9 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 78.00' 0.981 of Custom Stage Data Listed below Elevation Inc.Store Cum.Store • (feet) (acre-feet) (acre-feet) 78.00 0.000 0.000 79.00 0.134 0.134 80.00 0.162 0.296 81.00 0.195 0.491 82.00 0.240 0.731 83.00 0.250 0.981 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Secondary 82.00' 164.8 deg x 15.0' long Sharp-Crested Veerrrap Weir C= 2.47 #2 Primary 78.75' 45.0 deg x 2.00' rise Sharp-Crested Vee(rrap Weir C= 2.56 PrimaryOutFlow Max=10.97 cfs @ 12.67 hrs HW=82.01' (Free Discharge) L2--Sharp-Crested Vee/Trap Weir (Orifice Controls 10.97 cfs @ 6.62 fps) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.07 cfs @ 12.66 hrs HW=82.01' (Free Discharge) L1=Sharp-Crested Vee/Trap Weir (Weir Controls 0.07 cfs @ 0.35 fps) Hancock pond V weir 10-07Dev A +H Auto 100 yrs Type 111 24-hr 100 Year Rainfall=8.47" Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 15 HydroCAD®8.00 s/n 002234 ©2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/12/2007 Pond 2P: Pond 2 Hydrograph . p Inflow 1s.1arn®12%nrs OOutflow zo= Inflow Area=5.291 Em ®Secondary ;8. Peak Elev=82.01' 16: Storage=0.735 of 15 14-. 11.13 ds @12M hrs 13= _ _ y. — te.W cls®126]M1rs 'm 12. v 11 3 10: 0 9- LL 8 7 6 4: 3 2. 1- 0.15rn�1288 Ars fl • 1 2 3 : 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Time (ho 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ure) Hancock pond V weir 10-07Dev A +H Auto 100 yrs Type 111 24-hr 100 Year Rainfall=8.47" • Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 16 HydroCAD®8.00 s/n 002234 ©2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/12/2007 Link 1 L: (new Link) Inflow Area = 5.291 ac, Inflow Depth > 5.06" for 100 Year event Inflow = 10.96 cfs @ 12.73 hrs, Volume= 2.233 of Primary = 10.96 cfs @ 12.73 hrs, Volume= 2.233 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary outflow= Inflow, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Link 1L: (new Link) Hydrograph D Inflow 12- 3 Primry 11- Inflow Area=5.2 IOMM 12"^rs 10- 8- 7, 667_ 6 • o LL 5 4- 3 2. 1- 61 1-0-11 1,2 6 1,4 15 ............ ..19 ,. ..2.3 15 16 17 16 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) • 2s. (Subcat 2 car sto e+ _ road �1L 3R: �p 2R: (new Link) �—p 2P' �� t R' culvert under Robinson road Pond Pond 2 Culvert to brook (stream to prop line Subcat 1 Operations A P 3$. li�rge+infiltrators Impendous Liner +infiltrators • SO6rat Reach On Llnk': Drainage Diagram for Hancock pond V weir 10-07Dev A+H Auto10 yrs O a Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. 10/12/2007 HydroCADO 8.00 s/n 002234 0 2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hancock pond V weir 10-07Dev A +H Auto10 yrs Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 2 HydroCAD®8.00 s/n 002234 ©2006 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/12/2007 Area Listing (all nodes) Area (acres) CN Description (subcats) 0.540 55 Woods,good, HSG B (1S) 0.056 61 >75% Grass cover, good, HSG B (1S) 0.410 61 >75% Grass cover, good, hsg B (2S) 0.103 79 <50% Grass cover, poor, HSG B (2S) 2.320 82 Dirt Roads, HSG B (1 S) 0.330 82 Dirt roads, HSG B (2S) 1.130 85 Gravel roads, HSG B (1S,2S) 0.230 98 HDPE liner (3S) 0.126 98 Paved parking + roofs (1 S,2S) 0.046 98 concrete pad +trailers (3S) 5.291 e . 4 Hancock pond V weir 10-07Dev A +H Auto10 yrs Type 111 24-hr 10 Year Rainfall=4.80" • Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 3 HydroCAD®8.00 s/n 002234 ©2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/12/2007 Time span=1.00-24.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 461 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: Subcat 1 Operations Runoff Area=3.849 ac Runoff Depth>2.62" Flow Len th=601' Tc=28.0 min CN= g 79 Runoff- -6.91 cfs 0.839 of Subcatchment 2S: (Subcat 2 car storage+ road Runoff Area=1.166 ac Runoff Depth>2.37" . Flow Length=504' Tc=6.0 min CN=76 Runoff--3.17 cfs 0.230 of Subcatchment 3S: Impervious Liner+infiltrators Runoff Area=0.276 ac Runoff Depth>4.56" Flow Length=120' Slope=0.0100 T Tc=6.3 min CN=98 Runoff=1.26 cfs 0.105 of Reach 1R: Culvert to brook Avg. Depth=0.46' Max Vel=6.51 fps Inflow=4.43 cfs 0.889 of D=36.0" n=0.011 L=40.0' S=0.0125'P Capacity=88.13 cfs Outflow=4.43 cfs 0.889 of Reach 2R: (stream to prop line Avg. Depth=0.34' Max Vel=3.23 fps Inflow=4.43 cfs 0.889 of n=0.025 L=460.0' S=0.01007' Capacity=47.66 cfs Outflow=4.41 cfs 0.887 of Reach 3R: culvert under Robinson road Avg. Depth=0.47' Max Vel=7.80 fps Inflow=4.41 cfs 0.887 of D=24.0" n=0.011 L=30.0' S=0.0183 T Capacity=36.20 cfs Outflow--4.40 cfs 0.887 of • Pond 1P: liner storge+ infiltrators Peak EIev=106.05' Storage=0.043 of Inflow=1.26 cfs 0.105 of Discarded=0.10 cfs 0.105 of Primary=0.00 cfs 0.000 of Outflow=0.10 cfs 0.105 of Pond 2P: Pond 2 Peak EIev=80.52' Storage=0.398 of Inflow=8.12 cfs 1.069 of Primary=4.43 cfs 0.889 of Secondary=0.00 cfs 0.000 of Outflow=4.43 cfs 0.889 of Link 1L: (new Link) Inflow=4.40 cfs 0.887 of Primary=4.40 cfs 0.887 of Total Runoff Area= 5.291 ac Runoff Volume= 1.174 of Average Runoff Depth = 2.66" 92.401/o Pervious Area=4.889 ac 7.60% Impervious Area =0.402 ac Hancock pond V weir 10-07Dev A +H Auto10 yrs Type 11124-hr 10 Year Rainfall=4.80" • Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 4 HydroCAD®8.00 s/n 002234 ©2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/12/2007 Subcatchment IS: Subcat 1 Operations Runoff = 6.91 cfs @ 12.39 hrs, Volume= 0.839 af, Depth> 2.62" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr 10 Year Rainfall=4.80" Area (ac) CN Description 0.043 98 Paved parking + roofs 0.540 55 Woods,good, HSG B 0.890 85 Gravel roads, HSG B 2.320 82 Dirt Roads, HSG B 0.056 61 >75% Grass cover, good, HSG B 3.849 79 Weighted Average 3.806 Pervious Area 0.043 Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 23.4 75 0.0379 0.05. Sheet Flow, Subcat 1 dev A+H operations Woods: Dense underbrush n= 0.800 P2= 3.10" • 2.0 116 0.0379 0.97 Shallow Concentrated Flow, SC 1 dev roadway Woodland Kv= 5.0 fps 2.6 410 0.0260 2.60 Shallow Concentrated Flow, unpaved road Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps 28.0 601 Total Subcatchment IS: Subcat 1 Operations Hydrograph Runoff 7" 6.91 c(5 12.39 M1rs Type III 24-hr 10 Year 6- Rainfall=4.80" Runoff Area=3.849 ac 5 Runoff Volume=0.839 of 4_ Runoff Depth>2.62" W Flow Length=601' 3- Tc=28.0 min 2 CN=79 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) Hancock pond V weir 10-07Dev A +H Auto10 yrs Type 111 24-hr 10 Year Rainfall=4.80" . Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 5 HydroCAD®8.00 s/n 002234 ©2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/12/2007 Subcatchment 2S: (Subcat 2 car storage + road Runoff = 3.17 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.230 af, Depth> 2.37' Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr 10 Year Rainfall=4.80" Area (ac) CN Description 0.410 61 >75% Grass cover,good, hsg B 0.330 82 Dirt roads, HSG B 0.240 85 Gravel roads, HSG B 0.083 98 Paved parking + roofs 0.103 79 <50% Grass cover, poor, HSG B 1.166 76 Weighted Average 1.083 Pervious Area 0.083 Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 2.5 75 0.0400 0.50 Sheet Flow, sc 2 car storage Fallow n= 0.050 P2= 3.10" • 0.6 202 0.1336 5.88 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Ditch beside road Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps 2.5 227 0.0090 1.53 Shallow Concentrated Flow, swale gully Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps 0.4 Direct Entry, rip-rap 6.0 504 Total _ .. Hancock and V weir 10-07Dev A +H Auto10 yrs Type 111 24-hr 10 - P y yP Year Rainfall 4.80 Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 6 HydroCAD®8.00 s/n 002234 ©2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/12/2007 Subcatchment 2S: (Subcat 2 car storage + road Hydrograph O Runoff 9 _ an�b 0 1Z hrs 3 Type III 24-hr 10 Year Rainfall=4.80" Runoff Area=1.166 ac Runoff Volume=0.230 of 2-Runoff Depth>2.37" 3 LL Flow Length=504' Tc=6.0 min CN=76 r 0 1 2 .3.. 4 5 . 6 7 8 9 10 itTime (hou,.. 14 15 16 77 18 79 20 22 23 24 rs) Hancock pond V weir 10-07Dev A +H Auto10,yrs Type Ill 24-hr 10 Year Rainfall=4.80" Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 7 HydroCAD®8.00 s/n 002234 ©2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/12/2007 Subcatchment 3S: Impervious Liner +inflitrators Runoff = 1.26 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.105 af, Depth> 4.56" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr 10 Year Rainfall=4.80" Area (ac) CN Description 0.230 98 HDPE liner 0.046 98 concrete pad +trailers 0.276 98 Weighted Average 0.276 Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.3 120 0.0100 0.32 Sheet Flow, liner covered with 2' stone Fallow n= 0.050 P2= 3.10" Subcatchment 3S: Impervious Liner+infiltrators Hydrograph Runoff i.ze as�iz.as nrs Type III 24-hr 10 Year Rainfall=4.80" Runoff Area=0.276 ac Runoff Volume=0.105 of Runoff Depth>4.56" Flow Length=120' Slope=0.0100 '/' Tc=6.3 min CN=98 0 1 2 3 J 4 5 . ..6... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 .2 4 Time (hours) i Hancock pond V weir 10-07Dev A +H Auto10 yrs Type ///24-hr 10 Year Rainfall=4.80" Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 8 HydroCAD®8.00 s/n 002234 ©2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/12/2007 Reach 1 R: Culvert to brook [52] Hint: Inlet conditions not evaluated [79] Warning: Submerged Pond 2P Primary device#2 by 0.21' Inflow Area = 5.291 ac, Inflow Depth > 2.02" for 10 Year event Inflow = 4.43 cfs @ 12.74 hrs, Volume= 0.889 of Outflow = 4.43 cfs @ 12.74 hrs, Volume= 0.889 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.2 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Max. Velocity=6.51 fps, Min. Travel Time= 0.1 min Avg. Velocity = 3.65 fps, Avg. Travel Time= 0.2 min Peak Storage= 27 cf @ 12.74 hrs, Average Depth at Peak Storage=0.46' Bank-Full Depth= 3.00', Capacity at Bank-Full= 88.13 cfs 36.0" Diameter Pipe, n= 0.011 Length=40.0' Slope= 0.0125 '/' Inlet Invert= 78.50', Outlet Invert= 78.00' • Reach 1 R: Culvert to brook Hydrograph O�"flow 4.3 c @ 1274 hrs I [a Outflow Inflow Area=5.291 4QM@12.74hrs 4_ Avg. Depth=0.46' Max Vel=6.51 fps 3- D=36.0" n=0.011 L=40.0' 2- S=0.01257'S=0.0125 'P Capacity=88.13 cfs 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 16 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) Hancock pond V weir 10-07Dev A +H Auto10 yrs Type 11124-hr 10 Year Rainfall=4.80" • Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 9 HydroCADO 8.00 s/n 002234 ©2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/12/2007 Reach 2R: (stream to prop line Inflow Area = 5.291 > ac, Inflow Depth 2.02" for 10 Year event Inflow = 4.43 cfs @ 12.74 hrs, Volume= 0.889 of Outflow = 4.41 cfs @ 12.82 hrs, Volume= 0.887 af, Atten= 1%, Lag=4.9 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Max. Velocity= 3.23 fps, Min. Travel Time= 2.4 min Avg. Velocity = 3.23 fps, Avg. Travel Time= 2.4 min Peak Storage= 627 cf @ 12.78 hrs, Average Depth at Peak Storage= 0.34' Bank-Full Depth= 2.00', Capacity at Bank-Full=47.66 cfs Custom stage-perimeter table, n= 0.025 Intermediate values determined by Linear interpolation Length=460.0' Slope= 0.0100 '/' Inlet Invert= 77.00', Outlet Invert= 72.38' • Depth End Area Perim. Storage Discharge (feet) (sq-ft) (feet) (cubic-feet) (cfs) 0.00 0.0 0.0 0 0.00 0.50 2.0 5.0 920 6.47 1.00 4.0 6.0 1,840 18.18 1.50 6.0 7.0 2,760 32.25 2.00 8.0 8.0 3,680 47.66 • Hancock pond V weir 10-07Dev A +H Auto10 yrs Type ///24-hr 10 Year Rainfall=4.80" • Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 10 HydroCAD®8.00 sln 002234 ©2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/12/2007 Reach 2R: (stream to prop line Hydrograph ®Inflow 4.43 ah®12)4 h. - aOulfloW Inflow Area=5.29 66 �®M.� 4- Avg.. Depth=0.34' Max Vel=3.23 fps 3 n=0.025 w 3 L=460.0' 2 S=0.0100 T Capacity=47.66 cfs 6 .. o 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ,0 11 12 o 14 16 16 77 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hum) Hancock pond V weir 10-07Dev A +H Auto10 yrs Type 11124-hr 10 Year Rainfall=4.80" • Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 11 HydroCADO 8.00 s/n 002234 ©2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/12/2007 Reach 3R: culvert under Robinson road [52] Hint: Inlet conditions not evaluated [61] Hint: Submerged 10% of Reach 2R bottom Inflow Area = 5.291 ac, Inflow Depth > 2.01" for 10 Year even Inflow = 4.41 cfs @ 12.82 hrs, Volume= 0.887 of Outflow = 4.40 cfs @ 12.83 hrs, Volume= 0.887 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.1 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Max. Velocity= 7.80 fps, Min. Travel Time= 0.1 min Avg. Velocity = 4.40 fps, Avg. Travel Time= 0.1 min Peak Storage= 17 cf @ 12.83 hrs, Average Depth at Peak Storage= 0.47' Defined Flood Depth= 76.00', Capacity at Flood Depth=-5,584.15 cfs Bank-Full Depth=2.00', Capacity at Bank-Full= 36.20 cfs 24.0" Diameter Pipe, n= 0.011 Length= 30.0' Slope= 0.0183 ? Inlet Invert= 72.38', Outlet Invert= 71.83' • Reach 3R: culvert under Robinson road Hydrograph 4]Inflow 4.41.@ 1zU W I 0 Outflow Inflow Area=5.291 4- Avg. Depth=0.47' Max Vel=7.80 fps 3 D=24.0" n=0.011 L=30.0' 2- S=0.0183 '/'S=0.0183 '/' Capacity=36.20 cfs ,. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 it 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) L r Hancock pond V weir 10-07Dev A +H Auto10 yrs Type 11124-hr 10 Year Rainfall=4.80" • Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 12 HydroCADS 8.00 s/n 002234 ©2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/12/2007 Pond 1P. liner storge + infiltrators Inflow Area = 0.276 ac, Inflow Depth > 4.56" for 10 Year event Inflow = 1.26 cis @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.105 of Outflow = 0.10 cfs @ 13.04 hrs, Volume= 0.105 af, Atten= 92%, Lag= 57.0 min Discarded = 0.10 cfs @ 13.04 hrs, Volume= 0.105 of Primary = 0.00 cfs @ 1.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 106.05' @ 13.04 hrs Surf.Area= 0.047 ac Storage= 0.043 of Plug-Flow detention time= 172.3 min calculated for 0.105 of(100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 170.8 min ( 919.3- 748.5 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 105.00' 0.435 of Custom Stage Data(Irregular) Listed below Elevation Surf.Area Perim. Inc.Store Cum.Store Wet.Area (feet) (acres) (feet) (acre-feet) (acre-feet) (acres) 105.00 0.036 160.0 0.000 0.000 0.036 106.00 0.036 160.0 0.036 0.036 0.040 107.00 0.266 400.0 0.133 0.169 0.285 108.00 0.266 400.0 0.266 0.435 0.294 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 108.00' 6.0" x 10.0' long Culvert CMP, projecting, no headwall, Ke= 0.900 Outlet Invert= 107.50' S= 0.0500 'P Cc= 0.900 n= 0.011 #2 Discarded 0.00' 2.002 in/hr infiltrators 40 x 40 over Wetted area Dirded OutFlow Max=0.10 cfs @ 13.04 hrs HW=106.05' (Free Discharge) T-infiltrators 40 x 40 (Exfiltration Controls 0.10 cfs) Mrimary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 1.00 hrs HW=105.00' (Free Discharge) 1=Culvert ( Controls 0.00 cfs) • Hancock pond V weir 10-07Dev A +H Auto10 yrs Type 111 24-hr 10 Year Rainfall=4.80" • Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 13 HydroCAD®8.00 s/n 002234 ©2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/12/2007 Pond 1 P: liner storge + infiltrators Hydrograph a Inflow 1F>cis 120Ohss ❑Outflow Inflow Area=0.276 ac °P�ry �° ry Peak Elev=106.05' Storage--0.043 of 0 LL 0.10 cfs®13.01 hrs. GAO Is 15.M hrs ' O.00 CA�1.00 hrs - • 0-1 :2::.3. :.4 . 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ,6 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) • Hancock pond V weir 10-07Dev A +H Auto10 yrs Type Ill 24-hr 10 Year Rainfall=4.80" • Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 14 HydroCADO 8.00 s/n 002234 ©2006 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/12/2007 Pond 2P: Pond 2 Inflow Area = 5.291 ac Inflow or 1"2.4>Depth f p 2 0 Year event Inflow = 8.12 cfs @ 12.36 hrs, Volume= 1.069 of Outflow = 4.43 cfs @ 12.74 hrs, Volume= 0.889 af, Atten=45%, Lag= 22.7 min Primary = 4.43 cfs @ 12.74 hrs, Volume= 0.889 of Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 1.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 80.52' @ 12.74 hrs Surf.Area= 0.000 ac Storage= 0.398 of Flood Elev= 82,00' Surf.Area= 0.000 ac Storage= 0.731 of Plug-Flow detention time= 140.3 min calculated for 0.889 of(83% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 72.0 min ( 913.2-841.2 ) Volume Invert Avaii.Storage Storage Description #1 78.00' 0.981 of Custom Stage Data Listed below Elevation Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (acre-feet) (acre-feet) 78.00 0.000 0.000 79.00 0.134 0.134 • 80.00 0.162 0.296 81.00 0.195 0.491 82.00 0.240 0.731 83.00 0.250 0.981 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Secondary 82.00' 164.8 deg x 16.0' long Sharp-Crested Vee/Trap Weir C= 2.47 #2 Primary 78.75' 45.0 deg x 2.00' rise Sharp-Crested Vee/Trap Weir C= 2.56 PrimaryOutFlow Max=4.43 cfs @ 12.74 hrs HW=80.52' (Free Discharge) t-2--Sharp-Crested Vee/Trap Weir (Weir Controls 4.43 cfs @ 3.41 fps) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 1.00 hrs HW=78.00' (Free Discharge) L1=Sharp-Crested Vee/Trap Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) • Hancock pond V weir 10-07Dev A +H Auto10 yrs Type 111 24-hr 10 Year Rainfall=4.80" • Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 15 HydroCAD®8.00 s/n 002234 ©2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/12/2007 Pond 2P: Pond 2 Hydrograph 0 Inflow 8.12 cfn 1236 hrs ell Outflow Pnmary 9-A inflow Area=5.291 ac O Secondary 6 Peak Elev=80.52' 7- Storage=0.398 of 6- 4-0cts®1274 hrs m 6 4.40 cls 0 1274 hrs v 3 a 4 3- 2 o.00 c(s g 1.00 hrs _ • 0 .. . .. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) Hancock pond V weir 10-07Dev A +H Auto10 yrs Type 11124-hr 10 Year Rainfall=4.80" • Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 16 HydroCAD®8.00 s/n 002234 ©2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/12/2007 Link 1L: (new Link) Inflow Area = 5.291 ac, Inflow Depth > 2.01" for 10 Year event Inflow = 4.40 cfs @ 12.83 hrs, Volume= 0.887 of Primary = 4.40 cfs @ 12.83 hrs, Volume= 0.887 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary outflow= Inflow, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Link 1 L: (new Link) Hydrograph m Inflow a.° O.@1ZWh,s 0Primary Inflow Area=5.29 °°° ®'ZW^� 4- 3 w V 3 '• O LL 2 i 0 1 2 .3.. .4...-.5. ..6 7 8 9 10.: ,...14 .. .. 16 8 .20 .. ...23 ., 11 12 13 14 15 i6 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) • zs (Subcat 2 car s%-4 .. road _p 3R (new Link) • —� R, culvert under Robinson Culvert to brook (stream to prop line road �Pond 2 �Subcat 1 Operations t•P 3Sl li�rge+infiltrators Impervious Liner +infiltrators • Su6Cat Reach PODLlflf(> Drainage Diagram for Hancock pond V weir 10-07Dev A+H Auto 25 yrs O Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. 10/12/2007 HydroCAD®8.00 sin 002234 0 2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Y Hancock pond V weir 10-07Dev A +H Auto 25 yrs Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 2 HydroCAD®8.00 s/n 002234 ©2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/12/2007 Area Listing (all nodes) Area (acres) CN Description (subcats) 0.540 55 Woods,good, HSG B (1S) 0.056 61 >75% Grass cover, good, HSG B (1S) 0.410 61 >75% Grass cover, good, hsg B (2S) 0.103 79 <50%,Grass cover, poor, HSG B (2S) 2.320 82 Dirt Roads, HSG B (1S) 0.330 82 Dirt roads, HSG B (2S) 1.130 85 Gravel roads, HSG B (1S,2S) 0.230 98 HDPE liner (3S) • 0.126 98 Paved parking + roofs (1S,2S) 0.046 98 concrete pad +trailers (3S) 5.291 • 4 Hancock pond V weir 10-07Dev A +H Auto 25 yrs Type 11124-hr 25 Year Rainfall=5.93" . Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 3 HydroCAD®8.00 s/n 002234 ©2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/12/2007 Time span=1.00-24.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 461 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: Subcat 1 Operations Runoff Area=3.849 ac Runoff Depth>3.60" Flow Length=601' Tc=28.0 min CN=79 Runoff--9.49 cfs 1.154 of Subcatchment 2S: (Subcat 2 car storage+ road Runoff Area=1.166 ac Runoff Depth>3.32" Flow Length=504' Tc=6.0 min CN=76 Runoff=4.45 cfs 0.322 of Subcatchment 3S: Impervious Liner+infiltrators Runoff Area=0.276 ac Runoff Depth>5.69" Flow Length=120' Slope=0.0100'/' Tc=6.3 min CN=98 Runoff=1.56 cfs 0.131 of Reach 1R: Culvert to brook Avg. Depth=0.58' Max Vel=7.53 fps Inflow=7.26 cfs 1.288 of D=36.0" n=0.011 L=40.0' S=0.0125'/' Capacity=88.13 cfs Outflow=7.26 cfs 1.288 of Reach 2R: (stream to prop line Avg. Depth=0.53' Max Vel=3.40 fps Inflow=7.26 cfs 1.288 of n=0.025 L=460.0' S=0.0100'P Capac4=47.66 cfs Outflow=7.25 cfs 1.286 of Reach 3R: culvert under Robinson road Avg. Depth=0.61' Max Vel=9.00 fps Inflow=7.25 cfs 1.286 of D=24.0" n=0.011 L=30.0' S=0.0183 '/' Capacity=36.20 cfs Outflow=7.25 cfs 1.286 of • Pond 1P: liner storge+ infiltrators Peak EIev=106.14' Storage=0.054 of Inflow=1.56 cfs 0.131 of Discarded=0.15 cfs 0.126 of Primary=0.00 cfs 0.000 of Outflow=0.15 cfs 0.126 of Pond 2P: Pond 2 Peak EIev=80.98' Storage=0.487 of Inflow=11.16 cfs 1.476 of Primary=7.26 cfs 1.288 of Secondary=0.00 cfs 0.000 of Outflow=7.26 cfs 1.288 of Link 1 L: (new Link) Inflow=7.25 cfs 1.286 of Primary=7.25 cfs 1.286 of Total Runoff Area=5.291 ac Runoff Volume= 1.607 of Average Runoff Depth = 3.65" 92.40% Pervious Area=4.889 ac 7.601/6 Impervious Area=0.402 ac • Han + Rainfall= 5.93 and V weir 1 T - p 0-07Dev A H Auto 25 yrs Type Ill 24 hr 25 Year Rainfall 5.93" • Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 4 HydroCAD®8.00 s/n 002234 ©2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/12/2007 Subcatchment 1S: Subcat 1 Operations Runoff = 9.49 cfs @ 12.39 hrs, Volume= 1.154 af, Depth> 3.60" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=5.93" Area (ac) CN Description 0.043 98 Paved parking + roofs 0.540 55 Woods,good, HSG B 0.890 85 Gravel roads, HSG B 2.320 82 Dirt Roads, HSG B 0.056 61 >75% Grass cover, good, HSG B 3.849 79 Weighted Average 3.806 Pervious Area 0.043 Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 23.4 75 0.0379 0.05 Sheet Flow, Subcat 1 dev A+H operations Woods: Dense underbrush n= 0.800 P2= 3.10" 2.0 116 0.0379 0.97 Shallow Concentrated Flow, SC 1 dev roadway Woodland Kv= 5.0 fps 2.6 410 0.0260 2.60 Shallow Concentrated Flow, unpaved road Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps 28.0 601 Total Subcatchment 1S: Subcat 1 Operations Hydrograph Runoff 10 9.08 ae®12.39 h. Type III 24-hr 25 Year 8- Rainfall=5.93" Runoff Area=3.849 ac 7 Runoff Volume=1.154 of 6-. Runoff Depth>3.60" 6 Flow Length=601' Tc=28.0 min 3. CN=79 2 • 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) • Hancock pond V weir 10-07Dev A +H Auto 25 yrs Type ///24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=5.93" Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 5 HydroCAD®8.00 s/n 002234 ©2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/12/2007 Subcatchment 2S: (Subcat 2 car storage + road Runoff = 4.45 ds @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.322 af, Depth> 3.32" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=5.93" Area (ac) CN Description 0.410 61 >75% Grass cover, good, hsg B 0.330 82 Dirt roads, HSG B 0.240 85 Gravel roads, HSG B 0.083 98 Paved parking + roofs 0.103 79 <50% Grass cover, poor, HSG B 1.166 76 Weighted Average 1.083 Pervious Area 0.083 Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 2.5 75 0.0400 0.50 Sheet Flow, sc 2 car storage Fallow n= 0.050 P2= 3.10" • 0.6 202 0.1336 5.88 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Ditch beside road Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps 2.5 227 0.0090 1.53 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Swale gully Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps 0.4 Direct Entry, rip-rap 6.0 504 Total • • Hancock pond V weir 10-07Dev A +H Auto 25 yrs Type 11124-hr 25 Year Rainfall=5.93" Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 6 HydroCAD®8.00 s/n 002234 ©2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/12/2007 Subcatchment 2S: (Subcat 2 car storage + road Hydrograph p Runoff 4.4 c(s01Z Ors Type III 24-hr 25 Year 4 Rainfall=5.93" Runoff Area=1.166 ac 3 Runoff Volume=0.322 of Runoff Depth>3.32" LL 2 flow Length=504' ,r Tc=6.0 min CN=76 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ��12��1314 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 2324 Time (hours) • >t • Hancock pond V weir 10-07Dev A +H Auto 25 yrs Type 111 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=5.93" Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 7 HydroCAD®8.00 s/n 002234 ©2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/12/2007 Subcatchment 3S: Impervious Liner+infiltrators Runoff = 1.56 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.131 af, Depth> 5.69" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=5.93" 'Area (ac) CN Description 0.230 98 HDPE liner 0.046 98 concrete pad +trailers 0.276 98 Weighted Average 0.276 Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (fttsec) (cfs) 6.3 120 0.0100 0.32 Sheet Flow, liner covered with 2'stone Fallow n=0.050 P2= 3.10" Subcatchment 3S: Impervious Liner +infiltrators Hydrograph • p Runoff 1.56 cfs 1269 Ns Type III 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=5.93" Runoff Area=0.276 ac Runoff Volume=0.131 of Runoff Depth>5.69" Flow Length=120' Slope=0.0100 T Tc=6.3 min CN=98 NM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) - • Hancock pond V weir 10-07Dev A +H Auto 25 yrs Type 11124-hr 25 Year Rainfall=5.93" • Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 8 HydroCAD®8.00 s/n 002234 ©2006 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/12/2007 Reach 1 R: Culvert to brook [52] Hint: Inlet conditions not evaluated [79] Warning: Submerged Pond 2P Primary device#2 by 0.33' Inflow Area = 5.291 ac, Inflow Depth > 2.92" for 25 Year event Inflow = 7.26 cfs @ 12.65 hrs, Volume= 1.288 of Outflow = 7.26 cfs @ 12.65 hrs, Volume= 1.288 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.2 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Max. Velocity= 7.53 fps, Min. Travel Time= 0.1 min Avg. Velocity = 3.92 fps, Avg. Travel Time= 0.2 min Peak Storage= 39 cf @ 12.65 hrs, Average Depth at Peak Storage= 0.58' Bank-Full Depth= 3.00', Capacity at Bank-Full= 88.13 cfs 36.0" Diameter Pipe, n= 0.011 Length=40.0' Slope= 0.0125 ? Inlet Invert= 78.50', Outlet Invert= 78.00' Reach 1R: Culvert to brook Hydrograph 8 Inflow e c(s fixes^rs1(9 Outflow Inflow Area=5.291 Avg. Depth=0.58' Max Vel=7.53 fps 6 D=36.0" n=0.011 LL 4- L=40.0' 3 S=0.0125 T 2- Capacity=88.13 ds • O .. .. ... ........ „ .. . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) Hancock pond V weir 10-0713ev A +H Auto 25 yrs Type 11124-hr 25 Year Rainfall=5.93" • Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 9 HydroCADO 8.00 s/n 002234 ©2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/12/2007 Reach 2R: (stream to prop line Inflow Area = 5.291 ac, Inflow Depth > 2.92" for 25 Year event Inflow = 7.26 cfs @ 12.65 hrs, Volume= 1.288 of Outflow = 7.25 cfs @ 12.71 hrs, Volume= 1.286 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 3.6 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Max. Velocity= 3.40 fps, Min. Travel Time= 2.3 min Avg. Velocity= 3.24 fps, Avg. Travel Time= 2.4 min Peak Storage= 982 cf @ 12.67 hrs, Average Depth at Peak Storage= 0.53' Bank-Full Depth= 2.00', Capacity at Bank-Full=47.66 cfs Custom stage-perimeter table, n= 0.025 Intermediate values determined by Linear interpolation Length=460.0' Slope= 0.0100 'P Inlet Invert= 77.00', Outlet Invert= 72.38' Depth End Area Perim. Storage Discharge (feet) (sq-ft) (feet) (cubic-feet) (cfs) 0.00 0.0 0.0 0 0.00 0.50 2.0 5.0 920 6.47 1.00 4.0 6.0 1,840 18.18 1.50 6.0 7.0 2,760 32.25 2.00 8.0 8.0 3,680 47.66 Hancock pond V weir 10-07Dev A +H Auto 25 yrs Type 111 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=5.93" • Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 10 HydroCAD®8.00 s/n 002234 ©2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/12/2007 Reach 2R: (stream to prop line Hydrograph M Inflow -11 8- 7z e ®uas M ©Outflow Inflow Area=5.29 Z� 7 Avg. Depth=0.53' 6 Max Vel=3.40 fps 5 n=0.025 W _ 4 L=460.0' 3 S=0.0100 T Capacity=47.66 ds 2.- 0- 0 ..: .. Time (hours'. . ... „ 12 ... :.. • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 13 14 15 15 i6 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 • Hancock and V weir 10-07Dev A +H Auto 25 yrs Type 11124-hr 25 Year Rainfall=5.93" • P y YP Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 11 HydroCADO 8.00 s/n 002234 ©2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/12/2007 Reach 3R: culvert under Robinson road [52] Hint: Inlet conditions not evaluated [61] Hint: Submerged 13% of Reach 2R bottom Inflow Area = 5.291 ac, Inflow Depth > 2.92" for 25 Year event Inflow = 7.25 cfs @ 12.71 hrs, Volume= 1.286 of Outflow = 7.25 cfs @ 12.72 hrs, Volume= 1.286 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.2 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Max. Velocity= 9.00 fps, Min. Travel Time= 0.1 min Avg. Velocity =4.73 fps, Avg. Travel Time= 0.1 min Peak Storage= 24 cf @ 12.71 hrs, Average Depth at Peak Storage= 0.61' Defined Flood Depth= 76.00', Capacity at Flood Depth= -5,584.15 cfs Bank-Full Depth= 2.00', Capacity at Bank-Full= 36.20 cfs 24.0" Diameter Pipe, n= 0.011 Length= 30.0' Slope= 0.0183T Inlet Invert= 72.38', Outlet Invert= 71.83' i Reach 3R: culvert under Robinson road Hydrograph FED Inflow e 7.0 cn 62 ivi hrs I a Outflow Inflow Area=5.291 - tl x1272hrs Avg. Depth=0.61' 6- Max Vel=9.00 fps 5 D=24.0" n=0.011 4 LL L=30.0' 3 S=0.0183 T 2 Capacity=36.20 cfs 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) } Hancock pond V weir 10-07Dev A +H Auto 25 yrs Type 11124-hr 25 Year Rainfall=5.93" • Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 12 HydroCAD®8.00 s/n 002234 ©2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/12/2007 Pond 1 P: liner storge + infiltrators [82] Warning: Early inflow requires earlier time span Inflow Area = 0.276 ac, Inflow Depth > 5.69" for 25 Year event Inflow = 1.56 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.131 of Outflow = 0.15 cfs @ 12.92 hrs, Volume= 0.126 af, Atten= 91%, Lag=49.5 min Discarded = 0.15 cfs @ 12.92 hrs, Volume= 0.126 of Primary = 0.00 cfs @ 1.00 hrs,. Volume= 0.000 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 106.14' @ 12.92 hrs Surf.Area= 0.067 ac Storage= 0.054 of Plug-Flow detention time= 186.0 min calculated for 0.125 of(96% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 162.4 min ( 907.6 - 745.2 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 105.00' 0.435 of Custom Stage Data(Irregular) Listed below Elevation Surf.Area Perim. Inc.Store Cum.Store Wet.Area (feet) (acres) (feet) (acre-feet) (acre-feet) (acres) 105.00 0.036 160.0 0.000 0.000 0.036 • 106.00 0.036 160.0 0.036 0.036 0.040 107.00 0.266 400.0 0.133 0.169 0.285 108.00 0.266 400.0 0.266 0.435 0.294 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 108.00' 6.0" x 10.0' long Culvert CMP, projecting, no headwall, Ke= 0.900 Outlet Invert= 107.50' S= 0.0500 'P Cc= 0.900 n= 0.011 #2 Discarded 0.00' 2.002 in/hr infiltrators 40 x 40 over Wetted area Discarded OutFlow Max=0.15 cfs @ 12.92 hrs HW=106.14' (Free Discharge) 2=infiltrators 40 x 40 (Exfiltration Controls 0.15 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 1.00 hrs HW=105.00' (Free Discharge) t1=Culvert ( Controls 0.00 cfs) • Hancock pond V weir 10-I A +H Auto 25 yrs Type /1124-hr 25 Year Rainfall=5.93" • Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 13 HydroCAD®8.00 s/n 002234 ©2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/12/2007 Pond 1 P: liner storge + infiltrators Hydrograph El Inflow 1.58 ds Q 1209 nn 0 Ouf ow Inflow Area=0.276 ac M arye� Peak Elev=106.14' Storage=0.054 of 3 0 LL 0.15 ds®1292 nrs —_- y 0.15 dsa1292 0.00 ds 1.00 M1rs 0-� 1 234 5 6 7 6 9 L10 11 12 13 14 15'16 17 18 18 20 21 22 23 24 • Time (hours) • Hancock pond V weir 10-07Dev A +H Auto 25 yrs Type 111 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=5.93" • Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 14 HydroCAD®8.00 s/n 002234 ©2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/12/2007 Pond 2P: Pond 2 [95] Warning: Outlet Device#2 rise exceeded Inflow Area = 5.291 ac, Inflow Depth > 3.35" for 25 Year event Inflow = 11.16 cfs @ 12.36 hrs, Volume= 1.476 of Outflow = 7.26 cfs @ 12.65 hrs, Volume= 1.288 af, Atten= 35%, Lag= 17.6 min Primary = 7.26 cfs @ 12.65 hrs, Volume= 1.288 of Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 1.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 80.98' @ 12.65 hrs Surf.Area= 0.000 ac Storage= 0.487 of Flood Elev= 82.00' Surf.Area= 0.000 ac Storage= 0.731 of Plug-Flow detention time= 115.9 min calculated for 1.285 of(87% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 60.2 min ( 892.3- 832.0 ) - Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 78.00' 0.981 of Custom Stage Data Listed below Elevation Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (acre-feet) (acre-feet) 78.00 0.000 0.000 79.00 0.134 0.134 80.00 0.162 0.296 81.00 0.195 0.491 82.00 0.240 0.731 83.00 0.250 0.981 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Secondary 82.00' 164.8 deg x 15.0' long Sharp-Crested Vee/Trap Weir C=2.47 #2 Primary 78.75' 45.0 deg x 2.00' rise Sharp-Crested Vee/Trap Weir C= 2.56 Primary OutFlow Max=7.26 cfs @ 12.65 hrs HW=80.98' (Free Discharge) t--2--Sharp-Crested Vee/Trap Weir (Orifice Controls 7.26 cfs @ 4.38 fps) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 1.00 hrs HW=78.00' (Free Discharge) 1=Sharp-Crested Vee/Trap Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Hancock pond V weir 10-07Dev A +H Auto 25 yrs Type ///24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=5.93" . Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 15 HydroCAD®8.00 s/n 002234 ©2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/12/2007 Pond 2P: Pond 2 Hydrograph 11Inflow 11.16 ds�1236 Ars 0 Outflow Inflow Area=5.291_ac (aSeco dary 0 Primary ,2 11 Peak Elev=80.98' 10 Storage=0.487 of ®1Zfi nom- . 7 c 6 LL 5 4- 3- 2 r 1 O.Po cfs 1.00 hrs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) Hancock pond V weir 10-07Dev A +H Auto 25 yrs Type 11124-hr 25 Year Rainfall=5.93" Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 16 HydroCAD®8.00 s/n 002234 ©2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/12/2007 Link 1 L: (new Link) Inflow Area = 5.291 ac, Inflow Depth > 2.92" for 25 Year event Inflow = 7.25 cfs @ 12.72 hrs, Volume= 1.286 of Primary = 7.25 cfs @ 12.72 hrs, Volume= 1.286 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary outflow= Inflow, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Link 1 L: (new Link) Hydrograph E Inflow 8 7.25a.®un hrs B ftmary Inflow Area=5.2 725�®112M 7 6- 5 m `u 3 4 o u. 3 2 1 0-1 2 ... 4 5 6 7 8 ,:;9 10 11 .-., .,,.. .. ,,..., 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) JOHN R. KEILTY, C O U N S E LO R AT LAW 40 L.OWELL STREET TELEPHONE (978) 531-7900 PEABODY, MA 01960 FACSIMILE (978) 531-2479 RECENED March 15, 2005 MAR 1 6 2005 DEPT.OF PLANNING& COMMUNihf DEVELOPMENT Planning Board City of Salem 120 Washington Street Salem, MA 01970 Attn: Frank Toormina Re: Parcel A,Land Court Certificate No. 5005 Dear Mr. Toormina: I have recently been made aware that.some evidence of ownership has been filed with the Salem Planning Board and specifically with the Sign Board demonstrating some degree of a purported ownership of land formally of Griswold being the end of Robinson Road that intersects with Swampscott Road. I am of the opinion that this material,having been filed with a City Agency, is now public record and would respectfully request that you provide me with copies of the instruments filed with you. I have been to the Registry of Deeds and there seems no evidence of any transfer of what is Parcel A on Land Court Certificate No. 5005 to any party other than the heirs of Frederick H. Griswold. Very truly yours, John R. Keilty, Esquire JRK/emb cc: James Gilbert,Esquire, Salem City Solicitor Salem Planning Dept.,Attn: Lynn Duncan, Director James Rogal, Esquire Messrs. David and Dana DiLisio PSP y. c P o 5/8' LROD(S) 3/4' .ROD(S) 0.7* DIA. WW/SIGN 5T �•y.O9 •F 12.50 tip\� p F. 2 � y 1 I C5 1 1 2 STORY 0 C. BLOCK W BUILDING � C N Dib � ��°j 15 ROBINSON ROAD 1/2" REALTY TRUST DH(FD D LROD(S) FREDERICK HUTCHINSON, TRUSTEE ROBINSON ROAD" �OT,95 L.C.C. 3635-D �C \ X69 0 ,�moo• 7 AREA=10,222.47E ACRES �\7 .o v 1/2. M M LROD(S) O DH(FD) Q zo 1/2- LROD(S) CARMINE & NOLO MONGIELLO (L.C.C. 3635 0) CASTLE CR-1 1EEK ADVENTURELAND 100 SWAMPSCOTT RD SALEM,MA 01970 781-581-1478 November 17,2005 CHAIRMAN CONSERVATION COMMISSION KEVIN CORNACCHIO 120 WASHINGTON ST SALEM,MA 01970 Dear Mr.Chairman, My name is David DiLisio and I am a cc owner of Castle Creek Adventureland. I am writing this letter on behalf of myself Dana DiLisio, Carmen Mongiello and Angelo Mongiello all of whom own property that abut AAA Enterprises and Services Inc.located at 15 Robinson road in Salem. In the past we were strictly regulated by your commission and completed and fulfilled our certificate of compliance. The Mongiellos are currently doing the same.As a past member of the Swampscott Conservation Commission,I find it disturbing that AAA Enterprises has not been forced to come before your board and do the same when there are obvious violations.We are officially requesting that your board inspect AAA Enterprises entire site and bring this site into compliance with all wetlands regulations. We are requesting this because we very concerned that AAA`s violations will infringe on our compliance. Please contact us at your earliest possible convenience so that we could meet on our site to discuss a remedy to this matter. Sincerely, DV � Carmen Mongiello Angel Mon e yy , t CITY OF SALEMI, MASSACHUSETTS RECEIVED PUBLIC PROPERTY DEPARTMENT NOV 0 8 2005 120 WASHINGTON STREET, 3RD FLOOR DEPT. OFPLI„i'L Pefa U aMINB SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 ColApl ld,TyD`11. ,-OPMEIUT STANLEY J. USOVICZ, JR. TELEPHONE: 978-745-9595 EXT. 380 MAYOR FAX: 978-740-9846 t i November 7, 2005 ' AAA —Enterprises and Services, Inc. 15 Robinson Road t Salem, Mass. 01970 Mr. Hutchinson, This Department has previously established the fact that you operate an automobile and truck salvage yard. This business is a Grand fathered use. Any additional use requires relief from the Salem Zoning Board of Appeals. Currently, you are crushing and processing rock and other materials. i You are directed to cease and desist processing materials immediately. Failure to cease and desist will result in a complaint being filed at the appropriate court. Furthermore, the previous Board of Appeal decision allowing a Special Permit on November 17, 2004, has been appealed. Therefore you are ordered to cease the uses allowed in the November 17, 2004 decision until the Courts decide the appeal. i. Your right to appeal is to the Salem Zoning Board of Appeals. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me directly. Thomas J. St.Pierre Zoning Officer I Building Commisioner cc: Mayor's Office Asst. Solicitor—Elizabeth Rennard Arty: James Rogal l Staff Planner—Frank Taormina f I i I I �\ COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION METROPOLITAN BOSTON/NORTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE 205B LOWELL STREET, WILMINGTON, MA 01887 978-694-3200 MITT ROMNEY Governor STEPHEN R.PRITCHARD Secretary KERRY HEALEY ROBERT W.GOLLEDGE,Jr. Lieutenant Governor Commissioner This is an electronic facsimile of a document on file with the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection. (12/23/2005] Michael F. Geisser RE: SALEM—Bureau of Waste Prevention Alliance Environmental Group, Inc. A &H Auto Exchange, Inc. 124 Mt. Auburn Street 15 Robinson Road Suite 200 North IMF#383755 Cambridge,MA 02138 Waste and Recycling Management Plan (Best Management Plan) ACOP-NE-05-9015-2467 Dear Mr. Geisser: The Metropolitan Boston/Northeast Regional Office of the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Waste Prevention (the "Department' or "MassDEP") has received a Waste and Recycling Management Plan ("the Plan")regarding the operation of A&H Auto Exchange,Inc. ("A&H") at 15 Robinson Road in Salem, Massachusetts (the"Property"). The Plan was prepared on behalf of A&H by Alliance Environmental Group, Inc. in response to Administrative Consent Order with Penalty, ACOP-NE- 05-9015-2467 ("the ACOP"). The ACOP required, in part, the submittal of a Best Management Plan (`BMP") describing how A&H will operate in accordance with updated practices and applicable regulations. As subtrtted,the Plan does not adequately describe the following items: 1. Solid Waste Management – The Plan does not describe the management of solid waste at the Property. Pursuant to Paragraph 23.i of the ACOP,the BMP must describe the steps A&H has taken, and will take, to comply with the provisions of 310 CMR 16.00, 19.000 and 30.0000 relative to the management of solid waste and hazardous waste at the Property and with the requirements of the ACOP. 2. Wetland Resource Protection–The Plan does not describe the steps A&H has taken, or will take,to comply with the Wetland Protection Act, M.G.L. Chapter 131 Section 40 and the Wetland Regulations at 310 CMR 10.00. Pursuant to Paragraph 23.v of the ACOP, the BMP must describe the actions A&H has taken, or will take, to relocate vehicles and dumpsters to a location no closer than 50 feet from the banks of the stream or any wetland resource area on the Property, and ensure that future activities adjacent to the stream or other resource areas are in compliance with the This information is available in alternate format.Call Donald M.Gomes,ADA Coordinator at 617-556-1057.TDD Service-1-800-298-2207. DEP on the World Wide Web: http:/Iw .mass.gov/dep 40 Printed on Recycled Paper SALEM—A&H Auto Exchange,Inc. Page 2 of 2 Best Management Plan(ACOP-NE-05-9015-2467) This is an electronic facsimile of a document on file with the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection. Wetland Protection Act and the provisions of 310 CMR 10.00. These actions should include, without limitation, and as stipulated in paragraph 23.v of the ACOP, a plan describing how any vehicles, dumpsters and other materials will be removed from any wetland resource areas and the methods used to protect the wetland resource areas during the removal of these items. Such methods shall include, at a minimum, the placement of a hay bale sedimentation/erosion control and performing the work when the ground is dry,frozen or otherwise stable. In addition,a site plan shall be prepared by a certified professional engineer or land surveyor to document the location of all wetland resource areas and buffer zones at the Property as defined by the Massachusetts Wetlands Regulations, 310 CMR 10.00. Please provide to the Department a revised Plan to satisfy the Department's comments outlined above. The revised Plan shall include, without limitation, a schedule for completing the tasks in Item 2 above. Please note that Paragraph 35 of the ACOP requires: "Within thirty (30) days of the receipt of the Department's comments if any, regarding any submittal required pursuant to Part IV of this Consent Order, A&H shall submit to the Department a revised document that corrects any deficiencies reasonably identified by the Department in the draft document and makes any changes that the Department reasonably requires. Failure to submit a revised document within thirty (30) days shall constitute a violation of this Consent Order." In addition, all submissions made to the Department by A&H shall be certified by a responsible corporate officer of A&H in accordance with the applicable provisions of 310 CMR 19.000, including but not limited to the requirements of sections 310 CMR 19.011, 19.030(l 1), and 19.043. If you have any questions,please contact Mark Fairbrother at(978)694-3298. Sincerely, Sincerely, This final document copy is being provided to you electronically by the This final document copy is beingprosided to you electronically by the Department of Environmental Protection.A signed copy or this document Department of Environmental Protection.A signed copy of this document is as file at the DEP office Usted on the letterhead, icon file at the DEP office listed on the letterhead Mark G. Fairbrother John A. Carrigan Environmental Analyst Section Chief Solid Waste Management Section Solid Waste Management Section JAC/MGF/mgf Enclosure: NERO address notification cc: Michael Ferris A&H Auto Exchange, Inc. 15 Robinson Road Salem,MA 01970 James L.Rogal,Esq. Law Offices of Christopher M. Welch 32 Church Street Salem,MA 01970 AFIAmo Salem BMPCommems 200512 SALEM—A&H Auto Exchange,Inc. Page 3 of 3 Best Management Plan(ACOP-NE-05-9015-2467) This is an electronic facsimile of a document on file with the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection. Joanne Scott Salem Board of Health email: iscott@satem.com Frank Taormina Salem Department of Planning&Community Development email: ftaormina@salem.com David P.LaBrode DEP-NEROB WP Richard Tomczyk DEP-NEROBRP Heidi Zisch DEP-NERO/OGC AHAuto Salem BMPComments 200512 Frank Taormina From: Rebecca Longley Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 9:40 AM To: Lynn Duncan; Denise McClure; Frank Taormina Subject: DEP Wetland Violation Inspection at 15 Robinson Rd. I recieved a telephone call from Richard Tomczyk, DEP Wetlands and Waterways Division. He and Mr. Stelino from DEP met with owners of 15 Robinson Road (AAA Enterprises and Services) and their attorney, James Regal on Tuesday, December 14, 2004 at 9:00 am. The purpose of the inspection was to inspect the following wetlands violations per an August 10, 2004 letter from Frank Taormina to AAA Enterprises, et. al.: • altering wetlnads without proper local & state filing • filling and dumping brush and materials into wetland resource areas • location of junk vehicles and waste containers on the banks of a perennial strteam and within the buffer zone to a bordering vegetated wetland. DEP was lead to the alledged stream encroachment where the Bank of a stream had been cut. In DEP's opinion the work had been done over five years ago based on weathering of soil piles and vegetation growth in the area. They are not going to find this area as a violation. DEP observed the stream that runs along Robinson Road flowing from the pond to Swampscott Road. They observed that the trash containers and vehicles were located beyond the Bank and Bordering Vegetated Wetland. They also noted that the containers had been there for a long period of time. They are not going to find this area as a violation. DEP observed recent cutting of vegetation in the Buffer Zone to Bordering Vegetated Wetland in an area leased by AAA Tree Service from Carmine Mongiello. Rich asked if the leasor had filed with the Conservation Commission. I replied that they had. Because AAA Tree Service has fled with the Commission this work can be conditioned to comply with the Wetlands Protection Act. DEP saw encroachment into Bordering Vegetated Wetland and Stream on the Atlantic Extrusion property (an abandoned factory) at 96 Swampscott Road and to the west of the Salvage Company's property.lt appears as though a lock has been broken and individuals are driving onto a parking area and dumping trash in the wetland (e.g., television and tires). Rich Tomczyk suggested the City contact the owner of the property and require them place a new chain and lock at the gate, He said that a Realtors sign on the property listed a contact number as (781) 729-5000. DEP will issue a finding letter in a week or so and we will recieve a copy. Rebecca Longley, Environmental Planner Department of Planning & Community Development City Hall Annex 120 Washington Street Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Phone: 978.745.9595 Ext. 303 Fax: 978.740.0404 Email: rlongley@salem.com 1 door � CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS PUBLIC PROPERTY DEPARTMENT- 120 WASHINGTON STREET, 3RD FLOOR ��rMIN60fl� SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 STANLEY J. LISOVICZ, JR. TELEPHONE: 978-745-9595 EXT. 380 MAYOR FAX: 978-740-9846 1 ar q March 19, 2004 Don Cefalo Salem Conservation Commission _ s; 120 Washington Street Salem, Ma. 01970 Dear Don: This Department has received complaints regarding the condition of the property located at 15 Robinson Road. The complaint is centered on the proximity of the junk vehicles to the stream running along Robinson Road. This stream empties into the wetlands on the lower end of Swampscott Road. The property is controlled by Fred Hutchison and goes by AAA Enterprises and Services. Any help your Board could give would be appreciated. Sincerely, � Thomas St. Pierre Acting Building Commissioner cc: Joe Walsh Denise McClure i NERD-Uk.P-WILAIWG!t+Y an ra, . yr000roru �.. - Com uoNwFALTH OF A sACHUSETTS EXE UTNE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS DEP kRTmENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION NIETI OPOLITAN BOSTON—NORTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE �I MI;T ROIINEY { ELLEN ROY HPRZFELDER Cacedeor ! j KERRY HLA1.EY ROBERT t9. GOi,LBDOE,dr. Lieutenant OO -,ziir j - t7ommLtdonez ! i I1tis is am 61 ic jks1*Vk of a aatent on Jik with the Afanwhusew ndparrmeou of 6nvitvnme e&1 Piadeedoa. � CERTMED A&H Auto Exch ige,Ina [8/6120041 15 Robinson Road Salem,MA 0197 Attention:Michae�Ferris RE; SALEM Solid waste. Notice of Enforcement 'onferencv A&H Au�o Exchange, 15 Robinson Road FMF 0 38 755 NO CE OF ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE THIS IS AN ORTANT NOTICE.FAU.URE TO RESPOND TO THIS NOTICE COULD RESUI T IN SERIOUS LEGAL CONSEQUENCES. Dear Mr. Ferris; � On October 23,20b3 and June 2 i,2004,the Department of Environmental Protection(the"Depattmentr) observed conditions of noncomp 'ante at the A&H Auto Exchange Inc.("A&H")property located at 115 Robinson Road in Salem Massi ebusms (the "Propert)"). Specifically, Department personnel observdd portions of the A property transfer ing used for the storage, handling, processing and/or of solid waste. The .A&HProperty has not boon site assigned for such solid waste activities. In addition, the Department has h sued no pwrits, plans or approvals for a solid waste management facility at tt a Property. T17e Do partment sisi, observed conditions of noncomplisace, regarding the management of hazardous waste at the Property. p�p � 'these conditions a violations of the Massachusetts Solid Waste regulations at 310 CMR 16.00&310 j CMR 19.000,and a Massacha ats,hazardous Waste Regulations at 310 CMR 30.000. The Department ii I rtends to tak enforcement action in response to A&H's noncompliance. Possible actions include ssuanee by the Departncnt of an ENFORCEMENT ORDER, a CIVW ADIVUNISTRATIVE PENAL 'Y, and'or referral of the matter to the ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE for CIVIL or CRI1%1 INAL PROSECUTION. Prior to proceeding with eaforccment action, the Department raluests that A L14 attend an Enforcement Conference at this office on the following date and time to di icuss this ma ff nb inforagaaou vmtabk is alkiom format by colOtK a or ADA Coordiestor N(61'.)5744671 One 4mel stre6t 110bl.MA 02100,Pnafe t0i7)050.0400.6ax(017)0301047 TDD 0(600)260-:207 Q£P on tab Wdq Wide Web, hdpfA.ww.4(ate.me.uVdep � Primed on Recy'w Paler ! t 4 I 0 3� CITY OF SALEM CONSERVATION COMMISSION August 10, 2004 AAA Enterprises and Services c/o Fred Hutchison 15 Robinson Road Salem, MA 01970 Dear Mr. Hutchison I have received numerous phone calls and letters from abutters to your establishment regarding the operations on your property and the impacts they pose to the environment. An investigation was recently conducted and it has been determined that there are a number of serious violations on your property. In accordance with the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act (MGL Chapter 131, Section 40) and the Salem Wetlands Ordinance you are in violation of the following items: • Altering wetlands without proper local & State filing • Filling and dumping of brush and materials into wetland resource areas • Location of junk vehicles and waste containers on the banks of a perennial stream and within the buffer zone to a bordering vegetated wetland At this point, The Conservation Commission requests that you call (978) 745-9595 ext 311 within 30 days upon receipt of this letter, to schedule a meeting and review these violations immediately. It is our intent to seek a diplomatic approach to resolving this matter, however if this request is ignored, the City will forward this matter to our legal department. Sincerely, rank T rmina Planner/Conservation Agent Cc: Kevin Comacchio, Chairman Jean Pelletier, Ward Councilor James Gilbert, City Solicitor 120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TEL: 978.745.9595 FAx: 978.740.0404 WWW.SALEM.COM NEnO-DEPA ILMINGIUH MN ram i' O"1 oauu .. - . - A&H Auto ExcLagge,Inc. Notice of Fitforcem�et Conference Page 2 of 2 of6nwro"the bwA o a mod aw ilt Araff ckwsNb D t ws ad AWeakam �i k a sPreov�isIs Z1118 � � 1 � .�w Location: p Department of Eavironmeutal Protection Metropolitan BostonMortbeaat Regional Office One Winter Street j g Boston,MA 02108 Date: WWaeaday,September 1,2004 r. Time. 1:30 P.M. I II 'rite purpose of tEnfbrcernanent Conference is to provide A&H with the opportunity to reacha negotiated Depaten to return to oempliance and pay a civil administrative penakty, u partment believes that prompt resolution of this matter, in a maturer that ensures A&H's expeditiou4 return to con ipliance and resolves any penalty issues, is beneficial to both patties aid consi3tem.with tljc Department's environmental protection goals. The Enforcement Conference will provide A&H with the opportune to discuss the alleged violations and return to compliance. A draft Administrative Consent fWer with Penalty(ACOP) has been prepared, and is enclosed for your review. Iha dram ACOP incl a written description of the requirements violated, the actions the Ueparmtent wants Ai& l to take, the deadlines fol tAking such actions. If you either do 4ot attend the NEnforcement Conference or do not reach a negotiated settlement, tic Departawnt will itiate appr4ime enforcement action and A&H will have limited, if' any, furth opportunity to ren h a negotiawl 6ettlemeut of this"so. ; Please contact Malek Fairbrother,at (617) 654.6676 or Nvid La8tode at (617) 654-6667 by August 10, 2004 to confirm your attendancc'at this Enforcement Conference,or if you have any questions concwwr)g this matter. If y plan to be presented by counsel at the conference, please indicate so when you watact the Departmient. Sincerely, F Sincerely, illitelinesaaWY ppWtpjn .#A ere 11YbtlawWowit4'go aiii4pstYeriilt►ie awaiardOAusaals - AWMr aitaroar MtrreaMOsY�anWMMMA�1apItWMua1 Y�iOYDQ 10 rim4 ►nrMaellRitW•aeYllalaL Mark G.Fairbroth John A.Carrigan Environmental yst Section Chief Solid Waste bean ent Sectidn Solid Waste Management Section ,I JACIMUFIDPL! I Cerdfled Mail No, 11016 0078 603 7 Cc: Joanne SCID t(Salem 13oar4 of Health) e-mail•jse �gsalem come David P.L4 Brodo(DEP-"FRO) Edward] IF irwlowsld(DEI-NERD) Kathleen 10 slaplaw(DEPd Gc) I i .ULlme_NeawERe ja_0604 0 CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS _ PUBLIC PROPERTY DEPARTMENT o A 120 WASHINGTON STREET, 3RD FLOOR SpMINB SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 STANLEY J. USOVICZ, JR. TELEPHONE: 978-745-9595 EXT. 380 MAYOR FAX: 978-740-9846 July 29, 2004 II it P 9 2004 A & H Auto Exchange Inc � 1 e��I�A1r11 p•--fir.-t 15 Robinson Road PQ 11P Salem, Ma. 01970 RE: Zoning & Sign Violations Dear Mr. Hutichson: This Department has received and investigated a complaint regarding both Zoning and a sign that was recently erected without a permit. Your business, A & H Auto Exchange is located in an Industrial Zone. The junkyard is a grandfathered non-conforming use. Section 8-3 of the Salem Zoning Ordinance allows the use as the junkyard to continue but requires a Special Permit for any increase in uses or change in use. The addition of the trash business, container business or any other use requires a Special Permit. You are directed to either cease the additional uses or to apply to the Salem Zoning Board of Appeals for the increase in use. If you feel you are aggrieved by this order your appeal is also to the Salem Zoning Board of Appeals. The other violation is the sign that was erected without any permits. State Building Code 780 CMR, Section 3102.4 requires a building permit for any sign. Additionally, Salem Sign Ordinances requires all signs to be reviewed and approved by the Sign Committee (Planning Department) You are directed to either remove the sign or to file an application with the Sign Committee within 30 days upon receipt of this letter. If you have any questions, please contact me directly. Sincerely, Thomas St. Pierre Zoning Enforcement Officer cc: Kate Sullivan, Mayors Denise McClure, Planning Frank Taormina Attorney James Rogal Beth Rennard, Assistant City Solicitor �✓Ce� Dana DiLisio April 7,2004 David DiLisio 101SVInImmo 01 JaLnl. Mu 01970 Y Y�`V��6D APR 2 7 2004 Can=klongiello PrIDPVTF'fC" ^^t _ !lgelo Mongiclio „1 75 R obbtson at. Salem, Ma. 01970 Dear Sus, We zae oc Hers of Castle Creek Advenhrrelmad located at 100 Swampscott road mrd 4lcngietlo Cotl;tructien Co. located at 12-0, Swampscott road. We also arc proprietors of duce lioulcs located at 7, 10,and 1-1 Robuison road. \n'e have been operating both businesses at those locations ui S:!_m Mossachesetts 1'er many years. We are mitmg this letn_r because we are concemed about aL' i%inc:, dial :c'c 11'1%d Ql!Si'!'F'ed 0ecIlIring On arl ablilillIg pi,1pt1't), Til:propony In quesbon is located at 15 Robinson road. This property belongs to Mountain Reality Trust and the business on Illis property is ASC H Auto. the fi Blowing no our conczmis: 1-Sign orected along Swampscott road that is not pennitted. t t roving l us a ,:::,es Jnludmgwaiio hauling w ste tnu 1' forage and a:aste container K rage mAT no pennit. Grua.meted at end of Robinson road ieidi no porton. 4. aadxd 'iACIS,l Ol d li'.::I to R I!XIdj Cnl:.iH12 pn>slble COIIIm hila i('11 . Ar!rndv paled and ZOOS WIT WIT sacred newo homes vind - unds n SUN,c t h a -qu ma .I and No .ulp•)I_n.t,nlal l;tl ur s orer;nrg will.,no p_rmit. 7, is the mass quantity of;uuked vehicles beitag Mored and disposed of property S. ON Onq gasoline,nit, transmission fluid,brake thud and battery disposal. Q stored on and hlocldatg Robutscm Rd '1 1 Maw tare owull cpemli-a of ARCH Auto poses a serious threat of releasing ha ardour aalati:d u10 the ancuonmrut mrd otu pronc,tics. NQ also believe this L a quality of life and bealtll CORCern. A WISPOW011 by the appropriare authorities would be greatly appreciated . Please read this Wer at the upprop:iate board mceugs, hi addition, please respond to taus letter by mail regarding to aCllOili bemg t Rin Concet'IIIIig these matters. Ddrid DiLisio C.;late! Mongiello (.C. Jdl:nt COIIdeC`i iltl�?fl CC[ill111551Q11 C:c. Sale(ut Bu&lvig Inspector C:C. Ctalilzv USOVICZ Cc Joni Lovely Sal mBoal dofliezith Sal' m BCiCd Ofiippea]J C! Departttietir of Environniontal Protection 1 r Gly -OGl 3_a 6}-oo6w s� n!A+ NJ Sa,� it OI -d ii I I i� 62 N 'I. i +i� i nJ � -- i 1x ° -�,� A �` t i / _ r - COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION METROPOLITAN BOSTON - NORTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE ONE WINTER STREET, BOSTON, MA 02108 617-292-5500 MITT ROMNEY STEPHEN R.PRITCHARD Governor Secretary KERRY HEALEY ROBERT W. GOLLEDGE,Jr. Lieutenant Governor Commissioner This is an electronic facsimile of a document on file with file Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection. CERTIFIED MAIL [09/22/2005] A&H Auto Exchange, Inc. RE: SALEM—Solid Waste Management 15 Robinson Road A &H Auto Exchange, Inc. Salem, MA 01970 15 Robinson Road FMF#383755 Attention: Michael Ferris Administrative Consent Order with Penalty ACOP-NE-05-9015-2467 Dear Mr. Ferris: Enclosed herewith please find two copies of the final version of the Administrative Consent Order with Penalty (the "ACOP") regarding the A & H Auto Exchange Inc. ("A&H") property located at 15 Robinson Road in Salem, Massachusetts (the "Property"). Where appropriate, the draft ACOP has been revised to reflect the results of your meetings with the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (the"Department'). Please review the ACOP and, if it is acceptable, please sign, date and fill in the Federal Employer Identification Number on both copies, and return them both to my attention on or before October 5,2005. Once the Department has signed the documents, a fully executed copy will be sent to you for your files. Should you have any questions please contact me at(617) 654-6585. Sincerely, This final document topyis being provided to you electronically by the Department of Environmental Protection.A signed copy of this document Is on file at the DEP office listed on the letterhead. John A. Carrigan Section Chief Solid Waste Management Section JAC/MGF/mgf Enclosure: Administrative Consent Order with Penalty(ACOP-NE-05-9015-2467) (two copies) This information is available in alternate format.Call Donald M.Gomes,ADA Coordinator at 617-556-1057.TDD Service-1-800-298-2207. DEP on the World Wide Web: http://w .mass.gov/dep L�j1 Printed on Recycled Paper A&H Auto Exchange,Inc. (Salem) Page 2 of 2 ACOP-NE-05-9015-2467 This is an electronic facsimile of a document on file with the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection. Certified Mail No. 7004 1110 0001 6107 9484 cc: James L.Rogal,Esq. Law Offices of Christopher M. Welch email:Yoga]@welchlawoftirec rnm Joanne Scott Salem Board of Health email:;crntt O gi lem rnm (without enclosure) Frank Taormina Salem Department of Planning&Community Development email: ftaormina0salem rnm (without enclosure) David P. LaBrode DEP-NEROB WP Heidi Zisch DEP-NERO/OGC AHAuto Salem ACOPCvrLtr 09202005 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION METROPOLITAN BOSTON - NORTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE ONE WINTER STREET, BOSTON, MA 02108 617-292-5500 MITT ROMNEY STEPHEN R.PRITCHARD Governor Secretary KERRY HEALEY ROBERT W.GOLLEDGE,Jr. Lieutenant Governor Commissioner This is an electronic facsimile of a document on file with the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection. CERTIFIED MAIL [10/21/20051 James L. Rogal,Esq. RE: SALEM—Solid Waste Management Law Offices of Christopher M. Welch A&H Auto Exchange, Inc. 32 Church Street 15 Robinson Road Salem,MA 01970 IMF#383755 Administrative Consent Order with Penalty ACOP-NE-05-9015-2467 Dear Mr. Rogal: Enclosed herewith please find two copies of the final version of the Administrative Consent Order with Penalty (the "ACOP," version 10/06/2005) regarding the A & H Auto Exchange Inc. ("A&H") property located at 15 Robinson Road in Salem, Massachusetts (the "Property"). Where appropriate, the ACOP incorporates the results of your meetings with the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection(the "Department"), and your suggested changes. Please review the ACOP and, if it is acceptable, please sign, date and fill in the Federal Employer Identification Number on both copies, and return them both to my attention on or before October 31, 2005. Once the Department has signed the documents, a fully executed copy will be sent to you for your files. Should you have any questions, please contact Mark Fairbrother at(617)654-6676. Sincerely, This final document ropy is being provided to you elestri nicafy by the Department of EaviroamentalIntestine..A signed copy of this document is on fik at the DEP office filed an the lefferheai John A. Carrigan Section Chief Solid Waste Management Section JAC/MGF/mgf This information is available in alternate formal.Call Donald M.Games,ADA Coordinator at 617-556-1057.TDD Service-1.800-298-2207. DEP on the World Wide Web: http://w .mass.gov/dep iia Printed on Recycled Paper A&H Auto Exchange,Inc. (Salem) Page 2 of 2 ACOP-NE-05-9015-2467 This is an electronic facsimile of a document on file with the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection. Enclosure: Administrative Consent Order with Penalty(ACOP-NE-05-9015-2467)(two copies) Certified Mail No. 7004 3110 0001 6107 697R cc: Michael Ferris A&H Auto Exchange,Inc. 15 Robinson Road Salem,MA 01970 (without enclosure) Joanne Scott Salem Board of Health email: iscolt@salem.com (without enclosure) Frank Taormina Salem Department of Planning&Community Development email: ftaormino R galem rnm (without enclosure) David P.LaBrode DEP-NEROBWP Heidi Zisch DEP-NERO/OGC AHAuto Salem ACOPCvrLtr 10212005 Frank Taormina From: Fairbrother, Mark (DEP) [Mark.Fairbrother @State.ma.us] Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 3:55 PM To: jscott@salem.com Cc: ftaormina@salem.com Subject: RE: A&H Auto Exchange - 15 Robinson Rd, Salem E A&HAuto Salem A COPCvrLtr 10212... Dear Recipients, Attached is a copy of a letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, Northeast Regional Office (MassDEP/NERD) regarding 15 Robinson Road in Salem, MA (A&H Auto Exchange). The originals were mailed on October 21, 2005. If you have any questions regarding this document, please contact DEP/NERD Staff Person: Mark Fairbrother at(617) 654-6676. The attached document is an electronic facsimile of a document on file with the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection. For your information, the document was composed using Microsoft Word. Thank you, Mark Fairbrother Environmental Analyst MA DEP - NERO One Winter Street Boston, MA 02108 (617) 654-6676 For Use in Intra-Agency Policy Deliberations i 1 44ry. 5a�i�v 1�IGo a ti 4:LAW)_a�59 i CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS lid - BUILDING DEPARTMENT 120 WASHINGTON STREET, 3" FLOOR TEL. (978) 745-9595 FAX(978) 740-9846 KIMBERI.E�'81�iLi��III, 2006 MAYOR THOMAS ST.PIERRE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROPERTY/BUILDING COMMISSIONER Fred Hutchinson 15 Robinson Road Realty Trust ®Ef�1a�F pEl`ice'l 15 Robinson Road f� Salem, Mass. 01970 FEB 1 3 2005 RE: Swampscott Road DEPT.OF PLS'NNING& COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Mr. Hutchinson, I was called on Thursday February 9, 2006 to your property on Swampscott Road to investigate the steady stream of trucks hauling material. After observing a few vehicles and speaking with your grandson, it was determined that the material was unscreened loam that was being stockpiled and screened and ultimately returned to Swampscott where it originated. I was in touch with the D.E.P. to confirm that the operation was not in violation of the, orders previously issued. Over the phone, based on my description the D.E.P agreed there was no violation. However, as previously pointed out by this Department, expanding the use of your property beyond the Automobile Salvage Business violates Salem Zoning Ordinance. The additional use would require, as a minimum a Special ermit. You are directed to Cease and Desist processing soils and other materials not related to your Auto Business. Your right to appeal is to the Salem Z.B.A. 7 tti� Thomas J. St. Pierre Zoning Enforcement Officer Cc: Mayor's Office Acting City Solicitor—Elizabeth Rennard Arty: James Rogal —32 Church St., Salem Frank Taromina—Planning Department Councilor Jean Pelletier r ,per �\ COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION METROPOLITAN BOSTON -NORTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE MITT ROMNEY ELLEN ROY HERZFELDER Governor Secretary KERRY HEALEY ROBERT W.GOLLEDGE,Jr. Lieutenant Governor Commissioner This is an electronic facsimile of a document on file with the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection. Certified Mail [06/20/20051 A&H Auto Exchange,Inc. RE: SALEM—Solid Waste Management 15 Robinson Road A&H Auto Exchange, Inc. Salem, MA 01970 15 Robinson Road FMF#383755 Attention: Michael Ferris Draft Administrative Consent Order with Penalty Dear Mr. Ferris: Enclosed herewith please find two copies of the Draft Administrative Consent Order with Penalty (the "ACOP") regarding the A & H Auto Exchange Inc. ("A&H") property located at 15 Robinson Road in Salem, Massachusetts (the "Property"). Where appropriate, the draft ACOP has been revised to reflect the results of your Enforcement Conference with the Department of Environmental Protection (the "Department") on October 6, 2004. Please review the ACOP, and if it is acceptable, sign, date and fill in the Federal Employer Identification Number on both copies, and return them both to the Department's Northeast Regional Office on or before July 11, 2005. Once the Department has signed the documents, a fully executed copy will be sent to you for your files. If you have any questions concerning this matter,please contact Mark Fairbrother at(617) 654-6676. Sincerely, This final document copy is being provided to you dulronically by the Department of Emiroun hind Protodhist A signed copy of this document is on ilk at the DRP office baled an the letterhead John A. Carrigan Section Chief Solid Waste Management Section JAC/MGF/mgf Enclosure: Draft Administrative Consent Order with Penalty(ACOP-NE-DRAFT) Ceritified Mail No.: 7003 3110 0001 6107 8248 This information is available in alternate format by calling our ADA Coordinator at(617)574-6872. One Winter Street,Boston,MA 02108•Phone(617)654-6500•Fax(617)556-1049•TDD#(800)298-2207 DEP on the World Wide Web. http://w .state.ma.us/dep 0 Printed on Recycled Paper • A&H Auto Exchange, Inc.—Salem DRAFT ACOP Page 2 of 2 This is an electronic facsimile of a document on file with the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection. cc: James L.Rogal,Esq. Law Offices of Christopher M. Welch email:jroeal@welchlawoffices.com Joanne Scott Salem Board of Health email: iscott@salem.com (without enclosure) Frank Taormina Salem Department of Planning&Community Development email: faormina@salem.com (without enclosure) Heidi Zisch DEP-HERO/OGC AHAuto ACOPCvrLetter 062005 Frank Taormina From: Frank Morrill [f.morrill@comcast.net] m __ Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 7:36 PM To: ftaormina@salem.com Subject: frank Hi...again.....From one Frank to another....please tell me...what is all the action up on the hill off Swampscott Road....upon Robinson Road.... There are two excavators up there going like hell....from where I can see....it looks like they are digging foundations. It appears all the junk cars were moved to one side of the hill. Again...people ask me what they are doing.....all I tell them....is ...I will try to find out. If you have a chance...please respond. Frank Morrill 978-740-9934 2 mayflower Lane 2/17/2006 08/22/2005 09:00 FAX 19787456606 LAW OFFICES yam. ooa COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS LAND COURT A DEPARTMENT OF THE TRIAL COURT CASE NO. 3635-S-2003-12 Upon.the:petition of Cynthia Lee McArdle representing that Frederick H. Griswold was the registered owner in Certificate of Title No. 5005 issued from the Southern Essex Registry District; and representing the death of said Frederick H. Griswold, intestate, on.August 21, 1946, and the administration of his estate by the Probate and Family Court, Essex Division, in said Commonwealth; and further representing that Bessie G.Kennedy,his daughter, was his sole heir at law. Bessie G. Kennedy died November 24, 1969. Her Special Administration filed in Essex County, Document No. 303931, is reported to be missing.Bessie G. Kennedy was survived by her daughters Phyllis K. Warnock and Muriel B. Little; and further representing the death of said Phyllis K. Warnock in New Hampshire on July 11, 1996, and the allowance of her foreign will by the Probate and Family Court, Essex Division, in said Commonwealth, devising her 1/2 interest to as follows: An undivided 1/10 interest each to Cynthia Lee McArdle, David G. Michaud, Priscilla Jean Wakefield, Sarah Lee Lawing and Elizabeth Gail Robison; and praying for a new certificate of title, after due proceedings, it is ORDERED: that said Certificate of Title No. 5005 be cancelled and a new certificate of title for the land described therein be issued as follows: An undivided 1/10 interest to Cynthia Lee McArdle of North Hampton; An undivided 1/10 interest to David G. Michaud of Exeter, both in the State of New Hampshire; An undivided 1/10 interest to Priscilla Jean Wakefield of Arlington, in the Commonwealth of Virginia; An undivided 1/10 interest to Sarah Lee Lawing of Hope Mills, in the State of North Carolina; An undivided 1/10 interest to Elizabeth Gail Robison of Sheridan, in the State of Wyoming; An undivided %interest to Muriel B. Little of Edmonds, in the State of Washington. 08%'22/2005 09:00 FAX 19787456606 LAW OFFICES IA000 By the Court. (Long, J'.) Attest: Deborah J. Patterson Recorder A TRUE COPY Dated: May 24., 2005 ATTEST; V"Q4A484-) RECORCSR CLM: 15 Fern Ave., North Hampton,NH DCM: 6 Meadow Ln., Exeter, NH PJW; 1623 N. Patrick Henry Dr., Arlington, VA SLL: 3805 Colorado Ave., Hope Mills, NC EGR: 17 Cedar Lane, Sheridan, WY MBL: 1027 Euclid Ave., Edmonds, WA i SRG/tdp I i �\ COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION METROPOLITAN BOSTON/NORTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE 205B LOWELL STREET, WILMINGTON, MA 01887 978-694-3200 MITT ROMNEY STEPHEN R.PRITCHARD Governor Secretary KERRY HEALEY ROBERT W.GOLLEDGE,Jr. Lieutenant Governor Commissioner This is an electronic facsimile of a document on file with the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection. [02/22/2006] Dana Dilisio RE: SALEM—Bureau of Waste Prevention Castle Creek Adventure Land A&H Auto Exchange, Inc. 100 Swampscott Road 15 Robinson Road . Salem, MA 01970 FMF No: 383755 Dear Mr. Dilisio: The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection's Metropolitan Boston/Northeast Regional Office, Bureau of Waste Prevention ("MassDEP") has received your letter (dated February 14, 2006) regarding A&H Auto Exchange, Inc. ("A&H"), located at 15 Robinson Road in Salem, Massachusetts. Your letter describes several concerns associated with A&H's activities at the property and compliance with the Administrative Consent Order with Penalty, ACOP-NE-05-9015-2467, that A&H executed with MassDEP on November 10, 2005 (the"ACOP"). Regarding your concerns of potential zoning issues at the property, it is the Department's understanding that the City of Salem Building Department has taken action on these matters. To discuss your concerns further, the Department encourages you to contact the City of Salem. Regarding the ACOP, MassDEP personnel visited the property on February 10, 2006 and continues to monitor A&H's efforts to return to compliance, and MassDEP will take appropriate action as necessary. If you have any questions,please contact Mark Fairbrother at(978)694-3298, or John Carrigan at(978)694- 3299. Sincerely, Sincerely, This final document copy is being provided toyou electronically bythe This final document copy is being provided to you electronically by the Department of Eaviraamenirl Protection.A signed copy of this document Department of Environmental Protectioo..4 signed copy of this document is on file at the DEP o6cefialed on the letterhead. is on file at the DEP office fitted on the letterhead. Mark G. Fairbrother John A. Carrigan Environmental Analyst Section Chief Solid Waste Management Section Solid Waste Management Section JAC/MGF/mgf This information is available in alternate format.Call Donald M.Gomes,ADA Coordinator at 617-556-1057.TDD Service-1-800-298-2207. DEP on the World Wide Web: http://www.mass.gov/dep 0 Printed on Recycled Paper SALEM—A&H Auto Exchange, Inc. Page 2 of 2 cc: Joanne Scott Salem Board of Health email: iscott@salem.com Frank Taormina Salem Department of Planning&Community Development email: ftaormina@salem.com David P. LaBrode(DEP-HERO/BWP) Law Office of RECEIVED PATRICK J. DeIULIS 31 Collins Street Terrace MAR 0 6 2006 Lynn, Massachusetts 01902 DEPT.OF PLANNING& COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Telephone(781) 595-8677 Facsimile(781) 593-7840 e-mail: deiulis(a)deiulisbrothers com March 2, 2006 Mr. Kevin Cornacchio, Chairman City of Salem Conservation Commission 120 Washington Street Salem, Massachusetts 01970 RE: Junkyard and Auto Salvage Business Operated At 15 Robinson Road Dear Mr. Cornacchio and Members of the Conservation Commission: I represent Carmine and Angelo Mongiello,the owners of the property abutting the junkyard at 120 SwampscottRoad. The Mongiello's are concerned that the junkyard is operating outside of its permitted use and further that its operation is creating a danger to the resource areas within and adjacent to their property. Specifically,within the past several weeks large trucks have been hauling and dumping loads of material on the junkyard's property. I have enclosed a photograph that was taken on March 2, 2006 from the Mongiello's property which shows the stockpile of material. The Mongiello's are concerned that the runoff from this pile threatens the bordering resource areas as no protective measures have been implemented to prevent this from occurring. Further, the Mongiello's believe that the stockpile has encroached upon the buffer zone and that no approvals from the Commission have been obtained for this operation. Additionally, the junkyard continues to store dumpsters, buses,trailers and other forms of equipment and junk in close proximity to the Mongiello's property and the stream that runs partially between the two properties. The enclosed pictures taken on March 2, 2006 reveal a white foamy substance on the surface of the stream and also show some of the items mentioned above. The Mongiello's are unsure what the white foam represents but are sure that it originated from the junkyard. We would respectfully request that the Commission conduct a full review of the junkyard operation to insure that it is in compliance with the Wetlands Protection Act. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Ver truly y urs, Patrick Delulis Attorney for Carmine and Angelo Mongiello J w M. yy �n y. TipZIA, 4w1, U' \ .wit-��, �,,, a.�• ,F ,.. .- . r v[,'sA4- i a, 'r g yar t i •'rte. � 3a�r�'J P 'r� � �.4�4_♦:� r �f��C,'..�� a� rx :vs 4 :i xvi x-". �. �f�. � )" SRS f•. ♦ 7 7 {'ng p® 5 44 '1'4 t F •iA �F' 'Yt ?` � v ,,.„ r y y (fi',. :� '• Q • 8 s`!1`\��1�,� •fir �"'a"�ti::3� �� All , � `£ � .. ,t,, �. '� 1 / ,-•-'�,�- ��}};9 �s .tom �' �-}^"� Cm 1.1 IF ff 11 i ` • ^{ . tys>rapy. '"sh".rt�°R'i�'` 1'-'v! i;fy,�`-'- "t=,{'1J 1 "V ` t y 1 k �� i � R�+��%'r•,"��z 'dt ,�• hilt j � .�6. dl a� p.vA�QI IS L � (pA .h1�rld ,Yv all 11 qmo � + � �1�. �as �r��',,rg 1 ./ it •a`2 a' . + �"' Y '�j�'1#_4'i�'yn.�JSS..""-pp�••�`r( �__ 1. �1.� why♦■ �"!�C��_ ij ; f�J'n/ L} �. {iJAI' Irt9 n s j 1 r • � ®x`�Y 'Wsz*.e ��7r}'�,,r�- .rte• _ , r Mat 4It tea = 111W Aim, A\� � •1 y,�, Nw , It • - � d � gyp. 1 { i �`,��a • `,.y ` a `� �� _ ....�.I._ .sem_ _s=..,+r..��'�. t �t _ "�` -,,- V� � w,' Ilk nP �.isi ►y> PPz r 'q"�y , s i t A '3 i r W v" � St1 - ;q¢ , 4i µ 4 � `K� ,Y �s ff 1 �,t,��ii £y •�4?_`�6y a� 5 h~ Fvsf2_ ' zri'x.. &C1°�/�.L�d�i�'CY �w # � ♦1�; � �� -!�^ e{ «Y(1` i71 i?5,w�,p �`� ^°' � �.,�d�jj? . P'� a r �� a �.._. ' II �' � 'X w/'�,'b � •" e�f�� Y �� .4� E`�++i"� >�,,yy �~.> ieSF�'6�pp��kks `�',�}�a':.�d "R°�;y/' N�, t � i l r g '�Mwy. Y �y i f�', a Y}�� . ✓ �t;e F$C �Tx'C��a y/��?{' 3*Y- ,°y�i� {�..:'�+�n :�„`x- • +. llq fi ` x '�' :-1,.r8�}yy:� � a, �,f i� _�r ��,'�,6'� V xs��3i+r''�• ±A��~+�.�.• ,�'v�-��.0 ;/i � �� ,�E. :I' �.'S�� i�� r !� .ky_h 'r�de `'y1�V4th��o0 w�S'° "� �B ��' 4 F�' } ,�bp �•„ o.� � :'�� Y �• , ��a1M«o��yoRe�S -�' ,�{' �_4 �x i { ` Alst 9� - « 5« Y l;� s 8I`� .�� -'� "4 � h�%;+Fd .�•' Edi. { � ."; -, � t'•f,, IT minim �' ;1 PATROWICZ LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING July 27, 2006 Salem Conservation Commission Municipal Offices 120 Washington Street Salem, MA 01970 RE: Robinson Road and adjacent properties, Salem, MA Dear Commission Members: On behalf of the Mongiellos (direct abutters to work being proposed), I would like to express several serious concerns with the recently submitted Notice of Intent by SP Engineering. I have reviewed the Site Plan (1"= 50') submitted with the Notice of Intent. We met with the applicant last week to express some preliminary concerns. I walked the site on 7/25/06. Today at 2 PM, I received two blow-up plans (existing and proposed conditions at 1"= 10'). My observations, questions and concerns can be summarized as follows: 1. The plan submitted with the NOI is drawn at a 50-scale and does not show even the most basic information, such as: wetland resource areas,topographic contours (typically drawn to a one-foot contour interval for such a complex area as this is), proposed contours (showing how the area is to be constructed), buffer zones delineated, spot grades(proposed and existing), accurate edge of pond, accurate delineation of the unauthorized excavation area(see note #4 below). The 10-scale plans add some critical information, however the 10-scale plans also lack important details normally shown as follows: • Details of construction, • Accurate grading(namely grading for the south bank of pond#1 adjacent to the existing pond on Aggregate Industries property, grading of the grass swale transitioning into pond #2), • Retaining wall design between pond#1 and pond#2 (is this even practical?), • Drainage design(pipe sizes, slopes, pipe capacity,headwall design), • Slope stabilization(and extent of rip rap, many slopes are shown as 1:1, is this truly necessary?), • Outfall structures design details (including end walls and/or earthen berms), • Cross-section through the berm showing geotechnical considerations, 14 Brown Street, Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Cell: 978-836-6400 Fax: 978-745-4110 Email: scott.patrowicz@verizon.net • Forebay design (the 10-scale plan shows each forebay with a flat bottom directly draining into each lower basin, this would not allow the forebay to function properly allowing sediments to settle out), • Design and materials of the forebay and velocity barrier), • Maintenance access into the lower basins (the 10-scale plan shows 1:1 sideslopes 5-7-feet deep), • Full design of erosion control barriers (why is not erosion control proposed down-gradient of all work?), • Receiving riprap area at the outfalls of both proposed ponds (how is this graded to flow into the existing stream?), • Mitigation measures, • Wetland resource evaluation(by a qualified wetlands specialist), • Wetland resource alteration/replication, • Floodplain storage volumes lost/compensation, • Stormwater management controls (including details for construction), • Stream bottom cross-section, • Construction materials, • Proposed TSS removal, • Pollutant removal, • Nutrient loading calculations, • Operation and maintenance plan, etc. 2. The plan shows a proposed stream replication area inside the existing stream banks and wetlands. Is this allowed to modify an existing wetlands and replace it with another type of wetland resource area? 3. The blow-up plan(10-scale) shows a new stream and bank to be constructed within the 40- foot right of way for Robinson Road. This proposed stream(and its banks)would further make Robinson Road impassable. The right of way line was shown on the 50-scale plan, but not shown on the 10-scale plan. The 10-scale plan shows the stream centerline in a different location than the 50-scale plan. Which is it? The NOI report also refers to the positioning of this replicated stream inside the Robinson Road right of way. This action would further limit the rights for the Mongeillos to have full access to pass over the Robinson Road right of way. The Mongeillos do not support this portion of the proposal (for the new stream within the Robinson Road right of way). 4. Some years ago,there was unauthorized excavation where a channel was dug perpendicular inside the Robinson Road right of way, making it impassable. This area of excavation has adversely impacted the Mongiello's property and their rights to pass freely. Additional un- PATROWICZ LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING authorized excavation was performed creating a man-made wet area partially on the Mongiello property. It is my understanding, that this un-authorized excavation was reported in 2001, without any acceptable resolution to date. Since work is being proposed in adjacent to this area by the abutter(as shown on the attached aerials), now is the best time to, once and for all, resolve the blockage issue of the Robinson Road and the un- authorized creation of man-made wetlands. It is my understanding that there is also pending litigation regarding the Robinson Road blockage. 5. The Mongiello's are firmly in support of the culverting of the existing stream as shown in the Notice of Intent, especially given the fact that the runoff and pollutants from the abutting property have been flowing through the Mongiello's property for years. Recently some silt fence and haybales were installed. Unfortunately, they were improperly constructed, and the resulted in increased erosion, haybales dissolving and blocking the existing stream channel with silt and debris (some of which was cleaned out by the Mongiello's after the rainstorm). I inspected the existing stream channel on 7/25/06 and saw sediment, debris, and floating scum, all the result of up-gradient erosion. 6. The applicant proposes to install a second overflow devise on property owned by Aggregate Industries. Will there be an easement? Will it be registered in Land Court? 7. The plans presented with the Notice of Intent (and other supplemental blow-up plans) are not certified by a qualified engineer. Many details of construction are missing. My client requests the opportunities to review the above material and to have the necessary time to assess the impacts to their property. 8. At this time, we have not reviewed the drainage calculations. Were the drainage calculations prepared by a qualified engineer? We would like the opportunity to review this information when it becomes available. 9. Is a MEPA permit required, since more than 50 lineal feet of bank are being disturbed? 10. Is a wildlife habitat analysis and mitigation required? 11. Is an Army Corps permit required? Is a DEP Water Quality Certification required? 12. Has the City issued a drainage alteration permit? Has the City Engineer reviewed this application and plans? PATROWICZ LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING 13. What measures are being employed to remove pollutants that may be generated from the existing land use? Is a LSP required to make an evaluation and recommendations for pollutant control flowing into the downstream wetlands? The Mongiello's and I will attend tonight's meeting with the Conservation Commission and present this letter expressing our concerns and questions. Thank you Sincerely PATR Z LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING Scott Patrowicz, P.E. PATROWICZ LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING a t z �) S ,• r u s a` Alf Alm � • r1a c �k. 4 �4M— �• tM f*Y .�v rry a S•3svi•W'- D �r 1 •• 1 11 ••- 1 1 • 11 11 1 �P Apt 4r�lml y Af rM[ 'Cr• § A ,.f r .l, �. • t 1► S #11 � ►�,w".j5�'�At �, T _ � � �.. � » � yam{ tea.FOS � —immi&42vllt 7 4K St fopIlk +� ti s,y 4 r r 1 1 1 1 1 1 111 Salem Web URS-Prmtable Map Page Parcel Map & Aerial Photo Y uY3WmJV JYl P I �_�3yr�+ ^ +R �TY � 6 � r rw rl>L� YA.'t Ya3t � p, �' yr 14 I all i. . r r Parcel ID 06_0014_0 Address 120 - SWAMPSCOTT 15 ROAD _ Map for Reference Only Becau.<or-un.emint update r, schedules, current property assessments may not reflect recent •Y ' changes to property boundaries. NO* Check with the Board of Assessors to confirm boundaries used at time of �M�R► �� r -=b ...� assessment. http://host.appgeo.con/salemMA/PriDtableMap.aspx?mapType=ortho&subSymbol=&Add... 7/26/2006 AetaI� a toCIa4 &ate S 3 MA DEP Page 2 of 3 Manufacturer reccomends cleaning when the material is within six inches of the dry weather water level and when oils and greases are floating on the water surfaces. 064-0420 5/23/2006 Jack Meany Leggs Hill YMCA of the NE SALEM Grading for approximate house Road North Shore footprints needs to be provided on plan. Appears that lots 2,3,&4,will need additional grading beyond the 60 foot contour,provide all disturbance below and above this contour.Proposed design for Drainage Area 1 diverts flow from pond.What will be the potential ramifications to the Resource Area from this reduced runoff? Provide ownership of O&M Plan and locations of snow stockpile locations on site plan. 064-0421 5/30/2006 Gail&George Faiho 40 Clark NE SALEM The 1:2 riprap slope is too steep. Street Applicant should change design to provide a 1:3 slope.Why can't this slope be vegetated instead of ripraped? 064-0422 6/15/2006 Richard Bresnahan 60 Bay View NE SALEM NO Comments Avenue 064-0423 6/30/2006 George McLachlan Atlatic Algonquin NE SALEM Ocean off Gas NO Comments Salem Transmission LLC 64-0424 7/6/2006 David Jalbert 75 North Creations NE SALEM Addition proposed in Flood Zone A must Street Woodworking be constructed in accordance with FEMA construction guidance manual. Applicant should allow for a flow thru foundation. 064-0425 7/10/2006 F. Paul Richards 25 Peabody Mass Electric NE SALEM NO Comments Street Co 064-0426 7/16/2006 Mike Ferris 15 Robinson A&H Auto NE SALEM MassDEP is concerned about using Road Exchange, infiltration as a BMP on the site-see Inc. Standard#5 of the Stormwater Policy. rr In discussions with the engineer Bruce l ` v.a Poole,it was agreed that quarterlyync samplinq of the oil/water sena r I t discharge for petroleum hydrocarbons p�- oL�IW / S.,,y1 , I rom the monitorin well would take 1 p ace followed y yearly samplinq to check on the effectiveness of the separator.If problems were found,then corrective actions would be taken.The plans entitled Transects for NOI dated 7/06 show a perforated pipe instead of a solid pipe from the liner containment area to the oil/water separator.The reasons for culverting the intermittent stream appear o e va possible, increasing the strea—m re plication area is recommended.Dealt of stream https:Hedep.dep.mass.gov/wetland/wetland.aspx 7/27/2006 MA DEP Page 3 of 3 restoration area requiretl with cross sections. 064-0427 7/24/2006 Doug Jones Gas Neptune NE SALEM Transmition LNG LLC Under Review Line 064-0428 7/18/2006 Anne Pelletier 31 Ravenna NE SALEM Under Review Road 1 IMassDEP Home ❑ Contact: Your Regional Office ❑ Privacy Policy https://edep.dep.mass.gov/wet]and/wet]and.aspx 7/27/2006 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ONE WINTER STREET, BOSTON, MA 02108 617-292-5500 MITT ROMNEY Governor RECEIVED STEPHEN R.PRITCHARD Secretary KERRY HEALEY JUL 3 1 2006 ROBERT W.GOLLEDGE,Jr. Lieutenant Governor Commissioner DEPT.OF PLANNING& COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEP File# 064-0426 RE: NOTIFICATION OF WETLANDS PROTECTION ACT FILE NUMBER SALEM DATE: 7/27/2006 11:50 AM (city/town) The Department of Environmental Protection has received a Notice of Intent filed in accordance with the Wetlands Protection Act(M.G.L. c. 131, §40): Applicant: Mike Ferris Owner: A&H Auto Exchange, Inc. Address: 15 Robinson Road Address: Salem,MA 01970 LOCUS: 15 Robinson Road IF CHECKED,THE FOLLOWING ITEM(S)APPLY TO THIS NOTICE OF INTENT: A.-(X)-This project has been assigned the following file# : 064-0426 Although a file#is being issued,please note the following: MassDEP is concerned about using infiltration as a BMP on the site-see Standard#5 of the Stormwater Policy. In discussions with the engineer Bruce Poole, it was agreed that quarterly sampling of the oil/water separator discharge for petroleum-hydrocarbons from the monitoring well would take place followed by yearly sampling to check on the effectiveness of the separator. If problems were found, T - then corrective actions would be taken. The plans entitled Transects for NOI dated 7/06 show a perforated _r.pipe instead of a solid pipe from the line auunent azea_to the"oiUwater separator. The reasons for culverting the intermittent stream appear to be valid. If possible, Increasing the stream replication area is recommended. Detail of stream restoration area required with cross sections. C.()Other Regulatory Jurisdiction 1. O Application has been forwarded to Waterways Regulatory Program to determine if a Chapter 91 License is required. 2. () Applicant is advised to-fu ar a copy of the Notice of Intent to the Corps of Engineers — - --- - - for review(call 1-800-362-4367 for information). , D. O 401 Water Quality Certification The project described in your Notice of Intent requires a 401 Water Quality Certification from the Department of Environmental Protection and may require submittal of a 401 application form. See below for further details: This information is available in alternate format Call Donald M.Gomes,ADA Coordinator at 617-556-1057.TDD Service-1-800-298-2207. DEP on the World Wide Web: http://w .mass.gov/dep Printed on Recycled Paper 1. ()Based upon the information submitted in and with your Notice of Intent a separate 401 Water Quality Certification application form is not required. The Department has reviewed the plans submitted by the applicant and finds that there is reasonable assurance that the project or activity will be conducted in a manner that will not violate the Massachusetts Surface Water Quality Standards,provided that: a) the applicant receives and complies with a Final Order of Conditions from the local conservation commission or the Department; b) The Order of Conditions does not cause the loss of more than 5,OOOsq.ft. of bordering vegetated wetlands and land under water and/or the dredging of more than 100 cubic yards of land under water; c) any loss of vegetated wetlands has been mitigated with a minimum replication of 1:1; and is not part of a subdivision; does not cause the loss of any Wetlands designated as d) The project is not exempt from the M.G.L. c. 131, §40-the Wetlands Protection Act; Outstanding Resource Waters; and does not cause the loss of any salt marsh. Therefore,provided that the above conditions are satisfied, the Final Order of Conditions will serve as the. Water Quality Certification for this project. This does not relieve the applicant of the duty to comply with any other statutes or regulations. 2. ()Before the activity described in the Notice of Intent can commence,you must obtain a Water Quality Certification form from this Regional Office. Please complete the enclosed 401 Water Quality Certification application form and file it with this Regional Office for review. 3. ()Your project involves dredging of greater than 100 cubic yards of material or requires a permit from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission for work in"waters of the Commonwealth." Therefore,your proposed project is subject to 314 CMR 9.00 and requires a Water Quality Certification. Please complete the enclosed 401 Water Quality Certification application form and file it with the Department of Environmental Protection,Waterways Program, and One Winter Street,Boston,MA 02108. Contact the Division of Waterways program at 617-292-5655 if you have and questions. For more information please contact: Mr. GARY BOGUE at 978 694-2224. Cc: Conservation Commission: Salem Conservation Commission, City Hall 1 Salem Green I SEP-28-2006 13:14 SP INC 978 745 4881 P.02iO3 F'ENGINEERING, INC. P.O. Box 848•Salem, Massachusetts 01970•Telephone: 978.745-4569•Fax:978-745-4881 September 28,2006 — Cary Doucet Salem Conservation.Commission 120 Washington Street Salem,MA 01970 Re. A&H Auto Eubalsm 15 Robinson Road.Sakm.NOI Dear Mz.Ducet; I have prepared this correspondence to discuss update the status of the NOI application for A+H Auto Exchange, 15 Robinson Road,Salem.During the meeting on September Ie,several requests for more information and detailed topography were made by the commission members.Certain site modifications were requested and have been completed by A&H Auto.These include: 1. Placement of hay bales and siltation fence along the entire river bank by the driveway. 2. That the upper Robirm Road be blocked by a Jersey barrier at the driveway and at the gate in the chain link fence. 3. Stone and gravel that had been placed beside the driveway in the buffer zone has been removed. 4. Allremaining vehicles,steel and debris has been removed Som the buffer zone. A request was also made for wetlands delineation and topographic survey on the Aggregate Industries property beside Pond R.Chris Drucas,attorney for Aggregate Industries was present at the meeting and spoke with us after our pmsemation.He said he beard and understood the Conservation Commission request,however it is their official position that they do not want any delineation of the wetlands on the Pond and we are not allowed to trespass on their property(which abuts A&H Auto)and includes the section of Robinson Road where the foot bridge is located He agreed with the Conservation Commission that the mad should be closed off to prevent access. Therefore,we are unable to provide the additional information on that side. Because I had to travel to Canada all last week on business(we built several industrial wastewater treatment systems around Toronto for tanneries),we have not completed all the topographic details requested.We have had to redo the proposed BMP area in a 1 to 20 scale because the detail area requested would not fit on the 1 to 10 scale we had prepared. SEP-28-2006 13:16 SP INC 978 745 4881 P.03iO3 We would respectfully request a continuation until the next meeting to complete these details and provide more time for the reviewing engineer to examine the altered package. Please call if you have any questions. Very truly yon, SP Engineering,Inc. .. 404 Bruce M.Poole President BMP/or CC: Mike Ferris James Rogal,Esquire TOTAL P.03 SEP-07-2006 1354 SP INC 978 745 4881 P.02i02 F'ENGINEERING, INC. P.O. Box 848•Salem, Massachusetts 01970•Telephone:97B-745-4569• Fax: 978.745.4881 September 06,2006 Salem Conservation Commission 120 Washington Stred Salem,MA 01970 Re: A&H Auto Exchanm 15 Robinson Raad,Salem To Whom It May Concern, I have prepared this request on behalf of A&H Auto Exchange, 15 Robinson Road,Salem,relating to the Notice of Intent filed with the Conservation Commission.A site visit has been scheduled for Saturday, September 9,2006 to view the resource area,proposed changes to the brook,and stormwater management structures. The client respectfully requests that the public and abutters limit their visit to the wetlands areas under consideration. The Conservation Commission members would be allowed to view the other improvements in the operating area(Le.tank storage,impervious area,infiltrator locations)if they desire. Please call if you have any questions. Very truly yours, SP Engineering,Inc. A. 'y- Bruce M. Poole President BMP/cr CC:lames Rogal Esq,Mice Ferris TOTAL P.02 SEP-07-2006 13:53 SP INC 978 745 4881 P.01i02 [PENGINEERING • TECHNOLOGY P.O. Box 84S•Salem,Massachusetts 01970•telephone:978748.4589•Fax: 978745.4881 FAX COVER SHEET s� COMMUNE UEVELO MENZ l'7��++ERlG G'`irrepa�y c/{aiRer f C O+•wr..rfrd`7_ JwRb �r / CjG /�P Zaa p, 4 9f k�za a� aRy urr l�Fit aRm pleaw caa at Ram6" .i&aw aA&m afaeses ,341. wad 'Lomorew6x CITY OF SALEM CONSERVATION COMMISSION STTF VISIT FARM PROJECT LOCATION: 15 tc[y) 5tw� DATE OF SITE VISIT: PROJECT PROPONENT: Ki� DEP FILE NUMBER: PROPOSED WORK: �rN1ST�LC tFtl}(MUI��cN �SY�M1� �tt �Ftlt•( �G Q k i'- Ck- � - at ,�, G tik P��lJ CAL �� f+ a- , o ate- �INATTEN'DANCE Commission Members/Agent: Abutters: Applicant/Property Owner/Representative: AJ/di4E rezr , J - �SITE VISIT PURPOS - .x t,. , g � <a�1 „a ,. �f ._ _...i. _.. ..._ _a_.r_� ��>�IeE`S4 x'l,E,,I,„94..J i,ay.tN£i�wr�.+nwv'armma=,xus.„�..,�mtk Y.lili ��. i•.nCd`� �'�:3 i8 Request for Determination '❑Abbreviated Notice of Resource Area Delineation Notice of Intent ElCertificate of Compliance ❑Enforcement/Violation ❑Emergency ❑ Informal (AREAS O073 RISDICTION INLAND RESOURCE AREAS i� COASTAL RESOURCE AREAS I' Bank ❑ Land Subject to Coastal F]Land Under the Ocean Storm Flowage Bordering Vegetated Wetland € ❑ Designated Port Area ❑Coastal Beach El Land Subject to Flooding ¢¢{ 1� ❑ Coastal Dune ❑Barrier Beach ❑Land Under Water Bodies or Waterway Name: ❑ Coastal Bank [:]Rocky Intertidal Shore S= Riverfront Area ❑ Salt Marsh ❑ Land Under Salt Pond ElVernal Pools € ❑ Land Containing ❑Anadromous/Cata- Shellfish dromous Fish Run 31 ( ❑ Bordering Vegetated Wetland in Coastal Area ;E 120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TEL: 978.745.9595 FAx: 978.740.0404 • WWW.SALEM.COM BUEEERZONE (witRn 100 feet)_ E.. F1 Water Body ABordering Vegetated WetlandBank El Coastal Beachqq ❑Coastal Dune M:xi 111=11'2 9�:._ wI@..._ il_ .. €k.. INTERESIS.PROTECTED. M1{ G' _.:a;,t� - ?:� ,s� �:_,:r 5f.1,,, Protection of Water Supply LP Protection of Groundwater Supply Flood Control Storm Damage PreventionPrevention of Pollution E]Protection of Fisheries Ivi Protection of Wildlife Habitat ❑Protection of Land Containing Shellfish Is this an exempt project: If so,why? Are resource area boundaries delineated correctly? If not,explain. IFEIN=N'SITE VISIT QOCUMENTATION: os ❑Photos ❑ Site Map ❑Other: OBSERYATIONSa& Take into account relevant aspects or features such as: natural or piped drainage or obvious pollution; topography; existing vegetation; possible alternative sites; signs of wildlife, possible vernal pools, rare species habitat; landmarks; recent or historical disturbances; proximity to other water bodies or drainage areas; adjacent land uses. LW no sec �eNr Wct1 �� C,wffw J� 5:A Cg'Aa�" Cg� �f7k2 Iu�toM7- v� ` e5i .. cn lulu �FTVT' e t� i � " . .r.G. a '�xa- : asp do `STM.cve ,,�q 3.wuw{nea ". s qp +0 MW N�. -�ra�n t,•..� �l�II Civ �� n,� �I, UJ �� ' nnre, Dls�ie� �,,> )t�. � cam• �- `� � (J� � a� Dti�/h:�5-Cfl I��-�- ��1G-/`��Vii-((S -c��_ �.�,� s��,��,�� - - - - -rte ��-� - - \ _ --- � -O-SCLC- h�LY�� I_ l [PENGINEERING, INC. P.O. Box 848 • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 •Telephone: 978-745-4569 • Fax: 978-745-4881 September 14,2006 Cary Doucet Salem Conservation Commission 120 Washington Street Salem, MA 01970 Re: A&H Auto Exchange, 15 Robinson Road,Salem, Site Visit Dear Cary; I have prepared this correspondence to discuss the questions and comments advanced by the Conservation Commission members during the site visit Saturday, 09/09/06. I have recently discussed the project with DEP B WSC staff Mark Fairbrother and Gary at DEP Wetlands. The Commission members saw the complexity of the site, ledge formations, steep inclines,historical fill, large canopy cover in resource area, etc. and desired more detail on pre and post elevations,tree removal and subsoil conditions. A summary list of the comments are as follows: 1. Need 2-3 test pits in each pond bed to determine soil conditions and permeability. Soil with landfill materials cannot remain in the pond or grassy swale bottom. A minimum of 12"of loamy sand will be placed over suitable soils in the pond basin. 2. Show 100' Buffer Zone and resource area with better delineation. The site plan has been modified accordingly. 3. More detail is necessary on the Pond 1 berm placement and structural design to prevent breakthrough and release to the pond environment. We are excavating test pits on Thursday and hope to be able to lower Pond 16-8' and shift it over 10' to the east to put less stress on the existing in-place embankment. The final details would be ready for the next(9-28-06)meeting. 4. More detail was requested for the forebay of Pond 2 and subsoils in the pond bottom. The test pits described in item#3 will provide more data for incorporation into the plans. 5. Trees with diameters greater than 6"that have to be removed for BMP construction will be noted on the plan. 6. We have not found any notes in the USGS or US Soil Survey maps that designate the stream as a intermittent, however,the DEP considers it intermittent in their ACOP and the stream was dry during August last year. It should be noted that the pond on Aggregates' property that supplies the stream receives water from Fosters Dam that is pumped from the quarry. This would be a man made contribution. 7. The site has very limited area next to the stream for wetlands replication. Aggregate Industries was contacted and they said they were not interested in replication on their property(which is under Conservation Commission restriction). The impression I received from members at the site visit was that the area proposed for replication was not long enough,there was not enough separation between the other brook and construction would remove large canopy trees. It also appeared the abutters were going to object because it would move the stream closer to their property increasing the buffer zone. Because of all these factors,the owners and parties involved have decided to eliminate the proposed culvert and required replication. We respectfully request to modify the NOI application to eliminate the 250' culvert section. To achieve runoff control in that section of the stream by Robinson Road,we propose to place a 2' berm between the driveway and stream. The slopes involved will require the driveway to be shifted 20' to the east. The berms would wrap around Robinson Road but not obstruct it. We will discuss these issues at the upcoming Public Meetings. Please call if you have any questions. Very truly yours, SP Engineering, Inc. r% nit' -PO-(& Bruce M. Poole President BMP/cr CC: Mike Ferris �. CITY OF SALEM CONSERVATION COMMISSION %TTF VTSTT FnRM PROJECT LOCATION: 15 K0171M0, 0 , DATE OF SITE VISIT' PROJECT PROPONENT: I� ttw5�^ �U�1 5 DEP FILE NUMBER: II�� PROPOSED WORK: I�+v�tP h �ttXmuTCtX(V lPmr C� J t-J�Ia� Commission mb s/Agent:— AbuH.ers— 2 � � � n Applicant/Property Owner/Representative: MI C�4, 1 ❑Request for Determination ❑Abbreviated Notice of Resource Area Delineation ❑Notice of Intent ❑Certificate of Compliance ❑Enforcement/Violation ❑Emergency Informal / `I VI I /S 'It 5 111 « INLAND RESOURCE AREAS !G COASTAL RESOURCE AREAS 1{ ❑Bank ❑ Land Subject to Coastal ❑Land Under the Ocean Storm Flowage Bordering Vegetated Wetland + ❑ Designated Port Area ElCoastal Beach El Land Subject to Flooding ! { ❑ Coastal Dune ❑Barrier Beach ❑Land Under Water Bodies or Waterway Name: ❑ Coastal Bank ❑Rocky Intertidal Shore ❑Riverfront Area ❑ Salt Marsh ❑ Land Under Salt Pond ❑Vernal Pools I ❑ Land Containing ❑Anadromous/Cata- I Shellfish dromous Fish Run tiE ❑ Bordering Vegetated Wetland in Coastal Area I! 120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 • TEL: 978.745.9595 FAx: 978.740.0404 • WWW.SALEM.COM mLamrzn5as.sa�i� � �mxr + ti� �9 r�'R;n �Damn ,::E ew EJWater Body Bordering Vegetated Wetland El Bank ❑ Coastal Beach 0 Coastal Dune tINTERESTS,P.ROTECTED Protection of Water Supply Protection of Groundwater Supply Flood Control Storm Damage Prevention Prevention of Pollution Protection of Fisheries Protection of Wildlife Habitat ElProtection of Land Containing Shellfish Is this an exempt project: If so,why? Are resource area boundaries delineated correctly? If not,explain. SITE VIS DOCNTATION ORE al sin El Photos ❑ Site Map ❑Other: Take into account relevant aspects or features such as: natural or piped drainage or obvious pollution; topography; existing vegetation; possible alternative sites; signs of wildlife, possible vernal pools, rare species habitat; landmarks; recent or historical disturbances; proximity to other water bodies or drainage areas; adjacent land uses.. pp 11 11 O0r Lk A cxkJnJ 040-0, / In tl�A 6161-Z II da✓ �i�2 l(1AC A i l t n mti r7{ ,y `KP d (-t ,y-e� V V'A- t- J C�vel� RECOMMENDATION. (exsolve SEP-28-2006 13:14 SP INC 978 745 4881 P.01iO3 [PENGINE'ERING • TECHNOLOGY P.O.Bo:809•Salem,Massachusetts 01970•Telephone:979.745.4569•Fax:979.745 4881 FAX COVER SHEET coarioa vq a#b Su�R,, l.oh . Co, Suva• Q. �e�� c�ttentiaiAr—C.�,� 4a•c"i a�uerdg7 rl ' - d 11 y .yutaL .�ayt9�, eaclrirl�,y ,� ✓,F Ghees aw OW fueetsawi ave M4.1 41/o va4w", pleaw calf at 4fe aumsdez iAovjw aAwf& �lravrer Qrvtt c��drlitdoaad �'omar�str PATROWICZ LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING September 28, 2006 Salem Conservation Commission Municipal Offices 120 Washington Street Salem, MA 01970 RE: Notice of Intent application Robinson Road and adjacent properties, Salem, MA Dear Commission Members: On behalf of the Mongiellos(direct abutters to work being proposed), I would like to express serious concerns with the recently revised concept to delete the proposed culvert from the Notice of Intent application. The proposed culvert was to be located from the Robinson Road wetland crossing all the down to Swampscott Road. This proposed culvert would have greatly benefited the Mongiellos since it was conceptualized to divert stormwater away from the Mongiello's property. I(and you)heard about this revision for the first time at the public hearing on September 14, 2006. As you know,that night,I strongly voiced my opposition to this deletion of the culvert. To date, I have not been provided revised plans and calculations. Therefore, I have not been able to fully assess the potential impacts to the Mongiello's property. Unfortunately, I cannot attend the public hearing tonight due to another prior commitment. Therefore, I respectfully request the opportunity to review any and all revised plans and calculatio have ample time to submit them into the record prior to the Conservation Commis ting any decision on the subject NOI application. Thank you Sincerel , PATR CZ LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING Scott Patrowicz, P.E. 14 Brown Street, Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Cell: 978-836-6400 Fax: 978-745-4110 Email: scott.patrowicz@verizon.net i CITY OF SALEM CONSERVATION COMMISSION C %TTF VT4-;TT � FARM n PROJECT LOCATION: — 15 V��l �� w DATE OF SITE VISIT PROJECT PROPONENT: Q I fl� �11D`JJ DEP FILE NUMBER: 17-�� PROPOSED WORK: Cmk&— 4 uI RrN— �,,n ia- a,3 �/U 1 2 rnAl �4 ,t)C1 rae c n _—Eo I`MI" n IN AITENDyANCE '., slackp,lul wiaer Co s i M? ers gent: Abutters: Applicant/Property Owner/Representative: i ❑Request for Determination ❑Abbreviated Notice of Resource Area Delineation ❑Notice of Intent ❑Certificate of Compliance ❑Enforcement/Violation ❑Emergency Informal INLAND RESOURCE AREAS COASTAL RESOURCE AREAS % Il Bank it ❑ Land Subject to Coastal ❑Land Under the Ocean Storm Flowage $ordering Vegetated Wetland ❑ Designated Port Area ❑Coastal Beach ❑Land Subject to Flooding 'i ❑ Coastal Dune ❑Barrier Beach ❑Land Under Water Bodies or Waterway i' Name: Coastal Bank ❑Rocky Intertidal Shore Li ❑Riverfront Area ❑ Salt Marsh ❑ Land Under Salt Pond ❑Vernal Pools ❑ Land Containing ❑Anadromous/Cata- Shellfish dromous Fish Run ii ❑ Bordering Vegetated Wetland in Coastal Area I� 120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TEL: 978.745.9595 FAx: 978.740.0404 ♦ WWW.SALEM.COM i BUPFER.ZONE=(wdhm 100=feet)a` ---ad� P�"" "--�-� '�ID^��''��- °3t"•' ❑Water Body XBordering Vegetated Wetland )� Bank ❑ Coastal Beach ❑ Coastal Dune Protection of Water Supply P Protection of Groundwater Supply a Flood Control Storm Damage Prevention Prevention of Pollution Protection of Fisheries til Protection of Wildlife Habitat ❑Protection of Land Containing Shellfish Is this an exempt project: If so,why? Are resource area boundaries delineated correctly? If not,explain. SITE VISI'E=DOCUh1ENTATION. ` �� w�� s� z ��, � r" i �"�� photos ❑ Site Map ❑ Other: Y OBSERVATIONS: ' Take into account relevant aspects or features such as: natural or piped drainage or obvious pollution; topography; existing vegetation; possible alternative sites; signs of wildlife, possible vernal pools, rare species habitat; landmarks; recent or historical disturbances; proximity to other water bodies or drainage areas; adjacent land uses. RECOMMENDATIQNS_ FEB-15-2007 10:23 SP INC 978 745 4881 P.03iO4 HANCOCK Memo Engineering Associates 165 canis S4aet Danvers,MA 0193 To: Bruce Poole Fronu& Derek Anderson,E.I.T. M Al Taney, P.E.,John Dick Deft 2/13/2007 Rm Response to Comments-15 Robinson Road, Salem, MA The memo addresses comments received in an email from Carey Duques(Salem Conservation Agent/Staff Planer), to Bruce Poole(SP Engineering, Inc.),dated February 8, 2007,and per comments received in an email from Bruce Poole to Derek Anderson(Hancock Associates),dated February 8,2007,we are providing On following information regarding the proposed 38"diameter outlet from the detention basin and proposed liner for ttto detention basin. Prapossd 36"dda Debattaim Basta Outlet The smallest outlet pipe capable of serving the detention pond without ft pond overflowing the berm is an 18"diameter pipe, An 18'diameter pipe howem,only provides 9.5"of freeboard(storage available above the peak water elevation in the pond during a 100 year slam event). A larger,38"diameter pipe pmvkdes a safer design by reducing the pond's peak orator elevation,.and providing 1'-9"of freeboard. This signifloant increase In available storage in the pond results in only a 1.04 els increase in flows to the downstream pipe during the 100 year storm event(see table below). Furthermore.with a 38"diameter pipe outlet from dw detention pond,flows to the downstream pipe are reduced from the existing conditions for all yearly storm events analyzed (see table tow). Existing Peopusbd-ter"diameter Outlet , PrapOsod-18"dlaereter Outlet Fxfstlng Proposed - Peak o"M or Proposed Peak o"M of Storm Flows flows Pond Water in Flows Pond Wats n Event cfa Ws) Elevation Outlet P' ata Elevation Outlet P 2 YR 8.94 4.98 79.10' 7" 4.88 79.20' 8" 10 YR 13.44 9.84 70.52 12" 8.9 79.9P 17" 25 YR 18.09 14.63 79.75' 15' 13.99 80.20' Pipe Full 100 YR 1. 28.66 24.09 80.20' 20" 23.05 61.21' Pipe Full a Pape 1 FEB-15-2007 1023 SP INC 978 745 4881 P.04iO4 Dubmthm Radn Unw Per DEP's St mw ater Management Standard 5: aSiormwaterdischarges from areas wVr higherpotential po&dW loads require the use ofspeeilic sbmnvatermanagement BMPs. Specific restrictions and prohibitions on such BMPs are laid out in DEP's°Stormwater Polley Handbook"Regarding detention basins,the Handbook states: 'Sand ororgank Barg dtstenhon basins, wet ponds, oreonsbucted wetlands may be used only Isealed orlined.' As the site at 15 Robinson Road is an auto selvage yard(listed as#2 on DEP's list of Land Uses with Higher Potential Pollutant Loads),and as activities related to the auto salvage yard occur within subcatchments draining to the proposed deter►tion basin, DEP dearly requires that the detention pond be sealed or lined. The detention pond belf, along with the proposed water quality swales and their associated pretrea reballs,are necessary to accomplish 80%TSS removal, as shown in the TSS removal computations below, 80%TSS removal is required by DEPS Stormwater Management Standard 4, Pic Tref" BAND Damn as sterun 788Ramdwd TSS Remaining Me, - Im Removal Reu Lad at Discharge , was rose ,cox, nx 30% 2 os 70% so% 2,% 9% 91x Dsce Deep Sump ego Buhl Va Vadec"$Vd m SS street Seasons was 'WWGuenpr Salah . ow Dill wen as Detention Basin MandF RR,]U7WoodIMMkMAW113001021WAoe . 6 Pape 2 TOTAL P.04 Page 1 of 1 Carey Duques From: Brucepoolesp@aol.com Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 4:01 PM To: Carey Duques Cc: AAASALES@aol.com Subject: A&H Auto NOI Application Carey, I discussed the quorum issues with Mike at A&H and he understands the need to reopen the project, given the time period and modifications involved. We would request to have DEP 454-426 heard at the Conservation Commission meeting on Feb. 22, 2007 to provide time to re-advertise the project and re-notify the abutters. I will complete the abutters notification form and send it out. Regards, Bruce 2/7/2007 Page 1 of 1 Carey Duques From: Brucepoolesp@aol.com Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 2:35 PM To: G.bogue@state.ma.us Cc: david.labrode@state.ma.us ataney@hancock.com Subject: A+H Auto Exchange NOI 64-426 Dear Gary, We have been working with Al Taney PE at Hancock Eng. on the stormwater plan for the 15 Robinson Rd. site. The new design involves one large pond in the low area beside the stream to accomodate all the runoff. The question we have been debating the last two days is whether or not a liner is required in the pond. The project incorporates a separate inpervious liner and concrete to contain and treat the runoff generated inthe operations area (wrecks, stripping, crushing, gas tank storage etc.) where the potential for release is the greatest. The BMP has been designed as an infiltration pond to provide treatment of the WQV and attenuation of metal, nutrient and petroleum constituents by soil filtration and vegetation uptake, a liner would detain runoff but allow it to discharge directly to the stream. It is also important to note that the groundwater in the pond area is perched on ledge and recharges to the stream now, true groundwater is located >100' down and is nonpotable and the abutters have city water. I believe that the requirements of Std. 5 are met without a liner in the pond. I spoke with Dave LaBrode today and he concurs that better treatment of the runoff would occur without a liner in the pond consistent with the original proposal. We would appreciate your opinion on the matter so we can complete the design. Thanks Bruce 2/1/2007 C N U F'. e e Sep `o vJ ag p 6v CL :: WYMP CETT ti y 1 r ARA —ARE / �.,J I ` p 1 � Olt j 9� �,�� 701 ",�- oil! '' �'� ✓ %; 11 I f ! 0 1 i \ kt tq 1 \\\ I } F 1 \ � g � � �`� ; 1., � � �`.f X11�e _ 9 ✓ { 1 �011 r x I j - Page 1 of 1 Carey Duques From: Brucepoolesp@aol.com Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 11:00 AM To: Carey Duques Cc: AAASALES@aol.com Subject: 15 Robinson Rd. Salem Notice of intent DEP #64-426 Hi Carey, I just talked to John Dick about the progress on 15 Robinson Rd. He said the topo is complete and the engineer is working on pond design, however he was called away today to Leominster and may have to go again tommorrow. Since it is very important that we meet to review the submittal before the public hearing, I would respectfully request a continuance to the Feb. 8th meeting. Thanks, Bruce 1/23/2007 MEN JAN-05-2007 10=39 SP INC 978 745 4881 P.02i02 Y)ENGINEIERING, INC. P.O. Box 848 •Salem. Massachusetts 1019TO•Telephone:978-745-4669•Fax: 978-745-4881 January 5,2007 Carey Duques Salem Conservation Commission 120 Washington Sheet Salem,MA 01970 Re: A&H Acta Fschsnee,15 Robinsan Rw&Salem NO[ Dear Mz Duques, I have prepared this correspondence to®espectfuRy request a continuation of this matter until the nett Conservation Commission meetingan lanuary 25 th.We are awaiting the DEP comments from the most retest RDA applIcstion appeal and wilE meed time to review the comments. Hancock Engineering Consultants and John Dick visited the alte last week on Dec. 2e to survey the site. I spoke with John today and he said they need a few more:hours of survey to tie into the street and then will prepare the topographic plan and sections. Please call if you have any quesd=L Very truly yours. SP Engineering, Inc.O l Bruce M.Poole President BMP/cr CC: Mike Ferris James Rogal,Esquire TOTAL P.02 JAN-05-2007 10:39 SP Mc 978 745 4681 P.01i02 D ENGINEERING • TECHNOLOGY -P:0.-Box-m.- Salem,MassmhUSSM 01970•Telephone: 978.745-4568•Fax: 97&7454881 FAX COVER SKEET c��end ,ya/ Cw p aay c'jgrltE- S 1.4;rK GaN G 0;M Tzar CA Jaz c�yu�e6ea `I7� `7y0~0yo!� .JodaL Jaggy% tA,c�lrs�aia� c�.aem L 2 �f44ow aze &,W VA"WWS CM 4Ul 4ye' asrrliar4 pate cath a6 4fo 1&4wA&a 1&4w as8rrtM C:dra6 �.00rot�?il• -A + R: 4, ua,Q- T Page 1 of 1 Subj: A+H Auto exchange 15 Robinson Rd. NOI Date: 11/30/2006 10:55:52 AM Eastern Standard Time From: Brucepooleso To: CDugues(a)salem.com CC: Gaybogue@DEP.corn I spoke with John Dick of Hancock Eng. on Monday 11/27/06 and he will not be able to field a survey team until the second week of Dec. and a package for submittal would not be ready until Jan. We respectfully request a continuation of the NOI matter to the second meeting in Jan. Very truly yours, Bruce Poole --� RECEIVE NOV 3 0 2006 DEPT.Of PLANNING& COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Thursday,November 30, 2006 America Online: Brucepoolesp Nov. 21 06 11: 13a HancockRssoc. "978774781:6. p. 1, y SurveyingCivil Engineering Land Wetlar id Science Landscape Architecture #13287A HANCOC November 21, 2006 ASSOCIATES SP Engineering, Inc. Mr. Bruce Poole, President 45 Congress S%eet, P.O. Box 848 Salem, MA 0197,0- RE: Technical Proposal for Surveying and Engineering Services 15 Robinson Road,Salem, MA Dear Mr. Poole: This letter serves as a Proposal for services to be provided by Hancock Associates, (hereinafter "Hancock")to SP, Inc. (hereinafter, "Client"), in connection with 15 Robinson Road, Salem, MA(Tax Map 6, Lot 13). Client endorsement of this Proposal will constitute acceptance of this Proposal which, once accepted, will become the Contract between the parties. OBJECTIVE Phase A-01: Prepare Topographic Plan. Phase A-02: Prepare Permit Site Plan. SCOPE OF SERVICES Hancock proposes to achieve the OBJECTIVE as follows: Phase A-01: Topographic Plan 1. Conduct research at: a. City/Town Assessor's office. b. City/Town Engineer's office. C. City/Town Department of Public Works. d. Registry of Deeds. e. Massachusetts Land Court. f. Public& private utility companies. 2. Field topographic survey to locate pavement, structures, pertinent site features, spot elevations and elevation contours within the buffer zone along the southerly boundary of the subject property. 3. Field level run to establish elevations based on National Geodetic Vertical Datum. 4. Office calculations, platting and contouring of field data. 5. Drafting of a Topographic Plan (ink-on-mylar) with'two (2) fool contour intervals in AutoCAD format. 6. Initial printing and transmittal. Note: Locations of underground utilities are not included as part of this survey.- ESTIMATE: $3,500.00 REIMBURSABLE EXPENSE BUDGET: $25.00 Phase A-02: Permit Site Plan 1. Initial coordination with Client. 2, Design stormwater drainage. 3. Prepare site plan showing proposed improvements including buildings, existing utilities, grading, and drainage. OANVERS,MA MARLBOROUGH, MA LAKEVILLE,MA SALEM, NH 185 Centre Street 28 Lord Road, Suite 280 4 Freetown Street P.O. Box 205 Lakeville, MA 02347 Salem, NH 03079 Danvers. 1 701423 Mhone: (508)ugh,M 0111112 phone:(5081923-1002 Phone: (6031858-4701 Phone:(9781777-3050 Phone: 15081 0.11 I1 Fax: (6031898-6263 ce.•to+Nl neA916 Fax: 15081 460 1121 Fax: (508)9230022 r - Nov ..21 06 11 : 13a Hancockfassoc. 97877 7816 P- E #13287A SP Engineering, Inc. PAGE 2 November 21, 2006 4. Prepare stormwater management report in a format compatible with municipal codes and MDEP require»nts_. 5. Meeting-with Client to review completed drawing package. 6. Transmit Plans to Client for filing. 7. Prepare an exhibit plan for project presentation. B. Prepare for and attend Planning Board and Conseryation Commission public meetings. Note: Eight(8) hours have been allotted for this item. Note: Landscape and lighting design are not included. ESTIMATE: $5,950.00 REIMBURSABLE EXPENSE BUDGET: $200.00 ESTIMATED Total (including reimbursables): $9,675.00 PAYMENT Hancock will require an initial payment on account of $4,837.50 (please make checks payable to Hancock Associates). This sum shall be applied toward actual fees incurred. ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE Aside from the project SCOPE OF SERVICES, Hancock is capable of providing additional technical services such as, but not necessarily limited to: Additions/revisions required during municipal review. ® Approval process services such as attending meetings with municipal boards or concerned parties beyond allotted hours These efforts are not included within the SCOPE OF SERVICES and would be billed separately as set forth below, under COST. SCHEDULING Hancock is presently in a position to begin work on this project immediately upon our receipt of the executed contract, Property Owner Authorization and the initial payment set forth under PAYMENT. We estimate completion of Phases A-01 and A-02 of the SCOPE OF SERVICES within six(6) to eight (8) weeks of receipt of the executed contract, Property Owner Authorization and the initial payment. COST. The cost estimate and the standard FEE SCHEDULE, as set forth on the attachments, shall remain effective *one hundred eighty (180) calendar days following the date of this Proposal. Subsequently, services will be billed per the FEE SCHEDULE effective at the time services are rendered. PROJECT ADMINISTRATION Hancock requests that Client or a specific individual designated by Client be the Principal Contact on this project. Hancock will report to the Principal Contact, and to the extent necessary, provide copies of correspondence and seek direction. Within Hancock, I will serve as the Project Manager, and will be the primary contact person for day-to-day activities on the project. Nov '21 06 11 : 13a HancockAssoc. 9797747915 P. 3 #13287A SP.Engineering, Inc. PAGE 3 November 21, 2006 ACCEPTANCE If this Proposal-meets.with your approval, please sign and date where provided below, retain a copy for your records aad-return the signed/executed original to me, together with your initial payment on account and signed Property Owner Authorization. Also, please identify the Principal Contact, (with telephone number)with wham we should communicate. Finally, please review your files for any`subsurface utility/facility information you may have and forward them to us.We would be glad to make copies in-house as needed. This Proposal may be withdrawn by Hancock, if not accepted, as set forth above, within thirty (30) calendar days of the date hereon. Thank you for your consideration of our proposal. We look forward to working with you on this project. Respectfully submitted, HANCOCK ASSOCIATES Jo G. .L. . P ject Mane JGD/ras Proposal&Attachments Accepted: (Authorized Endorser for SP Engineering,Inc.) Printed Name: Date: Phone No: l / `� ) ,7 C� Fax No: -7 YS 9 ref Y Email Address: Billing Contact: Working Contact: Attachments: Fee Schedule Terms and Conditions 13287a.igd.ddc - Table 1 A & H Auto Truck Scale RFD Pre & Post Peak Flows (CFS) Storm Frequency 2 year 10 year 25 year 50 year 100 year SC 1 Operations Pre 7.84 13.32 17.08 21.48 25.52 SC 1 Operations Post 7.84 13.32 17.08 21.48 25.52 SC 2 Storage Pre 7.40 12.23 15.51 19.37 22.91 SC 2 Storage Post 4.79 8.03 10.24 12.48 15.22 SC 3 Scale Pre 0 0 0 0 0 SC 3 Scale Post 2.68 4.21 5.25 6.71 7.59 R1 Stream Pre 7.84 12.58 16.16 20.38 24.31 R1 Stream Post 7.84 12.58 16.16 20.38 24.31 R2 Culvert Pre 7.23 12.55 16.12 20.34 24.27 R2 Culvert Post 7.23 12.55 16.12 20.34 24.27 Ll Stream @ PL Pre 14.25 24.50 31.31 t 39.34 t 46.81 t Ll Stream @ PL Post 11.72 20.37 26.11 32.89 39.19 L2 Robinson Road Pre 0 0 L2 Robinson Road Post 2.68 4.21 5.25 6.71 7.59 * A 25-year or better storm splits flow between brook and road, but the rate is not known. t Brook culvert under Robinson Road (24")had capacity when new of 46 CFS. However the corrugated steel has buckled and actual capacity appears closer to 26 CFS. The brook has overflowed Robinson Road several times in the last five years. Note: These figures do not include the Aggregate Pond which is limited by a 24" discharge pipe. The Hydrocad data for pond and site contribution has been prepared for the NOI. Page 1 of 1 Carey Duques From: Brucepoolesp@aol.com Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 10:56 AM To: Carey Duques Cc: Garybogue@DEP.com Subject: A+H Auto exchange 15 Robinson Rd. NOI I spoke with John Dick of Hancock Eng. on Monday 11/27/06 and he will not be able to field a survey team until the second week of Dec. and a package for submittal would not be ready until Jan. We respectfully request a continuation of the NOI matter to the second meeting in Jan. Very truly yours, Bruce Poole 11/30/2006 &EP-14-2006 1321 5P INC 978 745 4881 P.02iO3 ENGINEERING, INC. P.O. Box 848•Salem. Massachusetts 01970•Telephone: 978-7454569•fax:978-7464881 September 14,2006 Cary Doucet Salem Conservation Commission 120 Washington Street Salem,MA 01970 Re: A&H Amro Ewehanee,15 Robimson Road.Sakur,Site Visit Dear may; I have prepared this correspondence to discuss the questions and comments advanced by the Conservation Commission members during the site visit Saturday,09/09/06.I have recently discussed the project with DEP BWSC staff Mark Fairbmthcr and Gary at DEP Wetlands. The Commission members saw the complexity of the site,ledge formations,steep inclines,historical fill,large canopy cover in resource area,etc.and desired more detail on pre and post elevations,tree removal and subsoil conditions.A summary fin of the comments are as follows: 1- Need 2-3 test pits in each poral bed to determine soil conditions and permeability.Soil with landfill materials cannot remain in the pond or grassy swale bottom.A minimum of 12"of loamy sand will be placed over suitable soils in the pond basin. 2. Show 100'Buffer Zone and resource area with better delineation. The site plan has been modified accordingly. 3. More detail is necessary on the Pond I berm placement and structural design to prevent breakthrough and release to the pond environment.We are excavating test pits on lbuusday and hope to be able to lower Pond 16-8' and shift it over 10'to the east to put less stress on the existing in-place embankment.The final details would be ready for the next(9-28-06)meeting. 4. More detail was requested for the forebay of Pond 2 and subsoils in the pond bottom. The test pits described in item#3 will provide more data for incorporation into the plans. 5. Trees with diameters greater than 6"that have to be removed for BMP construction will be noted on the plan. 6. We have not foturd any notes in the USGS or US Soil Survey maps that designate the stream as a intermittent.however,the DEP considers it intermittent do their ACOP and the stream was dry during August last year.It should be noted that the pond on Aggregates'property that supplies the stream receives water from Fosters Dam that is pumped from the quarry.This would be a man made contribution. SEP-14-2006 13:23 SP INC 978 745 4881 P.03iO3 7. The site bas very limited area next to the stream for wetlands replication.Aggregate Industries was contacted and they said they wen not interested in replication on their property(which is under Conservation Commission restriction).The impression I received from members at the site visit was that the area proposed for replication was not long enough,there was not enough separation between the other brook and construction would remove large canopy trees.It also appeared the abutters were going to object because it would move the stream closer to their property increasing the buffer zone. Because of all these factors,the owners and parties involved have decided to eliminate the proposed Culvert and required replication. We respectfully request to modify the N01 application to eliminate the 250' culvert section.To achieve runoff control in that section of the stream by Robinson Road,we propose to place a 2'berm between the driveway and stream.The slopes involved will require the driveway to be shifted 20'to the east.The berms would wrap around Robinson Road but not obstruct it. We will discuss these issues at the upcoming Public Meetings. Please call if you have any questions. Very truly yours, SP Engineering,Inc. �k,-� Bruce M. Poole President BMP/cr CC:Mike Ferris TOTAL P.03 OCT-20-2006 1643 SP INC 978 745 4881 P.02i02 [PENGINEERING, INC. P.O. Box 848•Salem, Massachusetts 01970 •Telephone: 978-746-4569•Fax: 978-7454881 October 20,2006 Carey Duques Salem Conservation Commission 120 Washington Street Salem,MA 01970 Re: A&H Auto Exehmgc 15 Robiusm Road.Salim,NOI Dear Mz. Duques, I have prepared this correspondence to respectfully request a continuation of this matter until the next Conservation Commission meeting.We have just gotten the DEP comments from the most recent site visit and will need time to review the comments and provide time for the reviewing engineer to examine the altered package. I am traveling to Canada next week as well.I apologize for the delay. Please call if you have any questions. Very truly yours, SP Engineering,Inc. �YK - Bruce M.Poole President BMP/cr CC:Mike Ferris James Rogal,Esquire TOTAL P.02 i i i COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION NORTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE 205B Lowell Street, Wilmington, MA 01887 • (978) 694-3200 DEVAL L.PATRICK IAN A.BOWLES Governor Secretary TIMOTHY P.MURRAY - ARLEEN O'DONNELL Lieutenant Governor Commissioner This is an electronic facsimile of a document on file with the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection. [04/24/2007] Michael Ferris RE: SALEM—Bureau of Waste Prevention A &H Auto Exchange, Inc. A&H Auto Exchange, Inc. 15 Robinson Road 15 Robinson Road Salem, MA 01970 IMF# 383755 Request for Information—Annual Compliance Report (ACOP-NE-05-9015-2467) Dear Mr. Ferris: The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection,Northeast Regional Office, Bureau of Waste Prevention ("MassDEP") has received a letter, dated April 13, 2007, regarding A&H Auto Exchange, Inc, ("A&H") at 15 Robinson Road in Salem, Massachusetts (the "Property"). The letter was prepared and submitted to MassDEP on your behalf by SP Engineering, Inc. of Salem, MA. The submittal provides a quarterly inspection report pursuant to Administrative Consent Order with Penalty, ACOP-NE-05-9015- 2467 ("the ACOP"). The ACOP required, without limitation, submittal of an Auto Recycling and Junkyard Best Management Plan (the "BMP") describing how A&H will operate in accordance with updated practices and applicable regulations'. The ACOP also required periodic compliance inspections of A&H's activities with written inspection reports submitted to MassDEP, including an annual compliance report due by May 1,2007. The details of these inspection requirements were outlined in MassDEP's letter to SP Engineering dated April 19, 2006. Upon review of the most recent inspection report, dated April 13, 2007, MassDEP has determined that additional information is necessary to determine A&H's compliance status as described below. The inspection report does not adequately evaluate A&H's compliance with the following: 1. Paragraph 19 of the ACOP, which requires, in part, that A&H cease all solid waste management activities at the Property that are not in compliance with the requirements of 310 CMR 16.00, 310 CMR 19.000,and 310 CMR 7.07(4). 2. Paragraph 20 of the ACOP, which requires, in part, that A&H manage all hazardous waste, including waste oil, at the Property in accordance with the requirements of 310 CMR 30.000,The Massachusetts Hazardous Waste Regulations. (Also refer to Item 4, below.) The BMP was prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. and received by MassDEP on July 7,2006. This infarmntiaa is available in alternate formnt.Call Donald A Gomes,ADA Coordinator at 617-556-1057.TDD service-1-800-298-2207, littp://www.inass.gov/dep.Fax(978)694-3499 Printed on Recycled Paper I SALEM-A&H Auto Exchange,Inc. Page 2 of 3 Request for Information—Annual Compliance Report(ACOP-NE-05-9015-2467) This is an electrmdcfacsimile of a document on file wide die Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection. 3. The Tire Removal Plan and Schedule required by Paragraph 21.b. of the ACOP, including the status of A&H's removal of accumulated tires from the Property and implementation of measures to prevent the future speculative accumulation of tires at the Property. 4. The specific management practices set forth in the BMP required by Paragraph 23 of the ACOP. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this notice, A&H shall submit to MassDEP the written annual report required by Paragraph 24.c. of the ACOP,which requires the documentation of i, the results of the quarterly inspections required by Paragraph 24.a.of the ACOP; ii. A&H's compliance status regarding the requirements of the ACOP and the activities described in the BMP;and iii. any additional reconunendations of the inspector to maintain compliance with the applicable regulations. The report shall include, without limitation, a "side-by-side" comparison of A&H's compliance with the specific management practices set forth in the BMP. In the event that A&H's activities are not in compliance with these requirements, the report shall identify the actions A&H intends to take to achieve I compliance and include a schedule for implementing those actions. All submissions made to MassDEP shall be signed and certified by the inspector and a responsible corporate officer of A&H in accordance with 310 CMR 19.011 that, to the best of his/her knowledge, all of the information is accurate and complete. If you have any questions, please contact Mark Fairbrother at(978)694-3298. Sincerely, Sincerely, This final document ropy is being provided to you electronically by the this final document ropy It being provided to you electronically by the Department of Environmental Protection.A signed copy or this document Department of Environmental Protection.A signed copy of(Jib document - Is on life at the DEP once]filed on the letterhead. is on file at the DEP office listed on the letterhead, Mark G.Fairbrother John A. Carrigan Environmental Analyst Section Chief Solid Waste Management Section Solid Waste Management Section JAC/MGF/mgf . cc: Bruce M.Poole SP Engineering,Inc. j P.O. Box 848 Salem,MA 01970 I James L. Regal,Esq. Law Offices of Christopher M. Welch 32 Church Street Salem, MA 01970 - Joanne Scott, Salem Board of Health email: iscott@salem.com Frank Taormina,Salem Department of Planning&Community Development email: ftaormina @salem.com A&HAuto-Salem-RfUetter-200704 i I i SALEM–A&H Auto Exchange, Inc. Page 3 of 3 Request for Information—Annual Compliance Report(ACOP-NE-05-9015-2467) This is an electronic facstmile of a document on file with the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection. Carey Duques,Salem Conservation Commission email:eduquesgesalem.com _ David P.LaBrode,MassDEP-NEROBWP Gary Bogue,MassDEP-HERO/BRP i A&IIAuto_Salent_RFILet ter_200704 MAY-17-2007 17:19 SP INC 978 745 4881 P.02i06 0 [PENGINEERING, INC. P.O. Box 848 •Salem, Massachusetts 01970•Telephone: 978-745-4569• Fax:978-745-4881 May 17,2007 Carey Duques Salem Conservation Caamlission 120 Washington Street Salem,MA 01970 Re: A&H Auto ExchanX& 15 son Road.Salem.N01 06"—M Dear Mz. Duques, I have prepared this correspondence to respectfully request a continuation of this matter until the Conservation Commission meeting on May 24,2007.As we discussed last week,the applicant is having financial difficulties and is unable to expend additional money for Engineering,I mentioned the strain at the last meeting,but we were unprepared for the Hancock invoice that came in at 17,292.84 approximately double the original contract of$9,700.In addition the estimate for the recent Con Com. requests was$5,800 in more survey and design Hancock has stated that they will not do any more wont until they are paid in full, l have been trying to contact John Dick for an update,after my E-mail of 4- 27-07 requesting a payment plan,but there has been no response. I believe the two main issues that need to be resolved are the outfall configuration and the amount of runoff contribution from the North(right)upper yard. I visited the site during a rain event this month and observed the runoff from the lower part of the mad going to the pond area,but the rest of the yard exiting elsewhere.Perhaps a visit to the site during a rain event could resolve this issue. I would also recommend that we return to the original outfall configuration I designed with a 6"WQV pipe at 78.5 Elev.and a 164 degree concrete V-knotch weir at 82.0 with steel surface baffles in front of the weir and around the 6"outlet.This provides the greatest detention time and will hold a 25 year event before overflowing the weir.The Hydrocad analysis for the design is in the most recent BMP as are pictures of the installation. We can provide a plan of the previous design for the next meeting if we cannot get. Hancock to finish. I apologize for the delay.Please call if you have any questions. Very trully yours, SP Engineering,Inc. y �lTt3�JC Bruce M. Poole President MAY-17-2007 1720 SP INC 978 745 4881 P.03i06 _ Subj: Re:A+H Auto Dade: 4/27/2007 1:23:26 PM Eastern Daylight Time From: Srixeiyolm To: jdi.Ok@hencockassociates_com AAASALES John, I am sorry to hear about the need for complete payment before finishing the PrOjeil.we are 90%done and this meeting Is critical to Mom getting back in business,they have not been able to process care and crush for a year, they can't transfer any fill materials,etc. until they have BMP.The anginal contrail was for$9700,yet the bill came in at$17,000 we would We more detail on the time spent for the contract work. I know there were questions and discussions about the need for a liner,different outlet configuration, bottom pond elevation,drainage by the Truck scale, but in the end nothing was clanged even after the meeting with Carey(Con.Com) reiterated my oonoems.At the meeting they did not Ida the pond design for many of the same reasons i expressed to AI Taney, and requested revisions. 1 would expect you to be responsible for the changes as the first design was not adequate in the opinion of the Con. Com.and DEP.We don"t expect it for flee and have agreed on$3800 in additional coats. The other thing to consider is that if they can't get approval and go out of business than no acre gets paid. I said 1 would pay 53000 on the invoice even though I have not received anything from A+H and can pay another 53000 in May. tett try to finish the process before DEP starts imposing fines under the ACOP. Regards Bruce See what's free at http:/Mww.aol.00m. TIutsday.Mav 17. 7..On7 Am~. .*rinlin - gn�nawnnloo.. MAY-17-2007 17.20 SP INC 978 745 4881 P.04i06 HANCOCK ASSOCIATES 185 Centre Street Danvers,MA 01923 Invoice number 41875 (978)777-3050 Date 4/2/2007 Page Number 1 Contract: 13287 SP Engineering, Inc. 15 Robinson Road, Salem, MA SP Engineering, Inc. Bruce Poole, President 45 Congress Street P.O. Box 848 Salem,MA 01970 Professional Services Performed Through February 22,2007 per Contract dated 11/21/2006 SCOPE OF SERVICES Phase A-01: Topographic Plan Completion of Phase(Items 1-6) 3,500.00 Additional fieldwork,calculations and plotting authorized by B. Poole at project site 12/28/06. Two Man Field Crew 7.00 hrs.@ 130/hr. 910.00 Draftsperson 3.30 hrs. @ 70/hr. 231.00 Phase A-02: Permit Site Plan Completion of Phase(Items 1-8) 5,950.00 Note: Estimate 5,950.00;Actual 11,907.50.Additional cost due to: 1. Revisions and additions to plans in response to regulatory memorandum from Bruce Poole, Scott Patrowitz, P.E.and C. Duques. 2. Additional design time to comply with DEP regulations for stormwater management for hazardous waste sites. 3. Research of Mass DEP regulations for stormwater design.for hazardous waste sites. 4. Preparation and attendance for meetings and sitewalks with Salem Conservation Commission beyond allotted hours. P.L.SJSenior Wetland Scientist 20.00 hrs. @ 110/hr. 2,200.00 Project Engineer 24,00 hrs. @ 80/hr. 1,920.00 Staff Engineer 12.50 hrs. @ 75/hr. 937.50 Draftsperson 12.00 hrs. @ 75/hr: 900.00 SERVICES TOTAL 16,548.50 Offices at: Danvers,MA,Marlborough,MA,Lakeville, MA and Salem,NH MRY-17-2007 17:20 SP INC 978 745 4881 P.05i06 Invoice number 41875 Date 4/2/2007 Page Number 2 Contract: 13287 SP Engineering,Inc. 15 Robinson Road, Salem, MA REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES Amount PHOTOCOPIES 450.00 COLOR COPY i l" X 17" 4.50 MULTI COPY PRINTER-24X36 PAPER 228.00 CERTIF,IEI)MAIL _ _. _... 4.64. . MILEAGE 57.20 REIMBURSABLE SUBTOTAL 744.34 Subtotal 17,292.84 Prepayment -3,000.00 Invoice total 14,292.84 Approved by BALANCES OVER 30 DAYS WILL BE CHARGED 1%INTEREST PER MONTH m m � a m NEW BERM AROUND POND AND FOREBAY ~ a o EXISTING GRADE STEEL SURFACE O c BAFFLE Ln VpfFOREBAY C co 10.Q _ `a ODOD / GRASSY WALE wO , O xx OGoXxx E D ° O DO " ° o %6000 X �Q /n V'SDR 35 FROM GRASSY SWA E� V l : mac OIL LOG O POND N2 2 O O ( 6"SC R_35 DRAIN O O c 000 6n SII m 79.0 N l� .y r m m rN I 4 0 60 80 } 100 12Q140 160 IBO 200 220 Em DISTANCE - FEET TRANSECT B MAY-17-2007 17:19 SP INC 978 745 4881 P.01i06 SIPENGINEERING • TECHNOLOGY P.O. Bou S48•Sakm,MaSSachU$Sft 01970•Telephone: 978-745-4589•Rax:978.745-4881 FAX COVER SHEET C�'o aha �fiYl7 C®vel -AM avmv 4e64S Y azo &V, ques&m ria 4fo, iaAma4w,% ,a/eauw calf al tJ Aim iAmm a P_ ��fi « �� ✓%Y- \-� 1• \ �' �lr ♦ ` � �s,. �'yF S4 1� $: i\y \ . 'T `l sC�-...,' �#, kk■WWVV{.�+p' . y'1:'\fit' ; �vy�; 1 11. ��# :��r�` � 3� �-s. �r .' � � �. 99,Fw' S 4,VNI . � yam. ��A 1� r �! � ��\�� i ♦i,� \ ,�kj.. (t�`� ,S� ��, ,�ffi � � �. �.� TO t sl • " 4t �`t_.ej t; ��e.�, y� 'N. 'l:+ \ . to� li1 iilip. .d".- jr .re ' '. �t"Q i!► i ' n s tuy Ae I7 k�kiSSN .A T�i a4- �.� .ya•i\��e _ `"�,�ei � � • �.a1F. 11 \ �• ��'13��_,,��. MAY-24-2007 1437 SP INC 978 745 4881 P.01/02 y [PENGINEERING • TECHNOLOGY P.O. Box us-SaleM Massachusetts 01970•Telephone:978-7454569•Pax:978-7451881 FAX COVER SBIEET c�'e�d ✓oi CE'o y c'l`a oaer cb,;,) Com �wnw cw"*"wCAREY }a: ✓yu� 775' '7y0- OLfoy a �R u,UE cii'�Eloa,ad "iaPer�tr " � F� 1M�• t5�7� e d I 0 Yvt4 IM�d o�n^ 8� r , MAY-24-2007 14:3B SP INC 976 745 4881 P.02i02 [PENGINEERING, INC. P.O. Box 848• Salem, Massachusetts 01970-Telephone:978.745-4569•Fax: 978-7454861 May 23,2007 Carey Duques Salem Conservation Commission 120 Washington Street Salem, MA 01970 Re: A&H Auto Fac"15 Robinson Road.Sslem. NOI r DEP M 64.426 Dear Mz. Duques, On behalf of my client A&H Auto Exchange,I have prepared this correspondence to respectfully request to withdraw without prejudice the application for the Notice of Intent filed in February 2007 for the construction of stomlwater Control swAtures. I have been contacted by Elizabeth Sabounjian of the DEP Wetlands Enforcement Division who pointed out that the ACOP supersedes the need for an NOI because BMP is in the consent order.There is also the concern at the State level that the process has been bogged down by unnecessary requests and appeals. They have reviewed the technical package and feel it is sufficient to proceed with minor outfall changes and will issue the permit shortly to keep us on schedule. She mentioned that since this is redevelopment of existing conditions all they can require is"maximum feasible compliance"and we have met that condition. Please call if you have any questions. Very truly yours, SP Engineering,Inc. n A&H Auto Exchange Inc. I�J.-t c t e_t.. M. ` OV& Bruce M.Poole Michael Ferris President BMP/cr CC: Mike Ferris James Rogal,Esquire TOTAL P.02 Page 1 of 2 Carey Duques From: Sabounjian, Elizabeth (DEP) [Elizabeth.Sabounjian@state.ma.us] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 1:03 PM To: Carey Duques Cc: Bogue,Gary (DEP); Fairbrother, Mark (DEP); LaBrode, David (DEP) Subject: RE: A& H Auto You are correct in your summary of what I explained to you today. I have a massage into Bruce Pool to call me. When I speak with him I will tell him the same thing and advise that the NOI be withdrawn ASAP. MassDEP will then work with A & H toward getting compliance with the ACOP and a possible amendment with more specification on deadlines and disposition. If you have any questions at anytime about the status of all of this, just call and I can provide an informal update for you to pass on to the Commission. Elizabeth Sabounjian, Environmental Analyst Wetlands & Waterways Program Northeast Regional Office MA Department of Environmental Protection 205B Lowell Street Wilmington, MA 01887 Main: 978-694-3200 Direct: 978-694-3259 FAX: 978-694-3498 Elizabeth.Sabounjian@state.ma.us From: Carey Duques [mailto:CDuques@Salem.com] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 12:13 PM To: Sabounjian, Elizabeth (DEP) Cc: Bogue,Gary (DEP) Subject: A & H Auto Hello Elizabeth, I wanted to summarize the conversation we had this morning on the phone regarding A & H to make sure I understood the next steps regarding the Consent Order for A & H Auto located at 15 Robinson Road in Salem, MA. Under a Consent Order issued by DEP a Notice of Intent does not need to be filed by the landowner because it is redundant. As a result DEP is recommending that the landowner withdrawal the NOI that is currently before the Salem Conservation Commission. Going forward, the enforcement on this property will be dealt with by DEP. The local Conservation Commission can oversee the implementation of the plan approved by DEP and report concerns to DEP, who will enforce the Consent Order. Once the DEP approves the plans to bring the site into compliance the Salem Conservation Commission will be CCed copies of the approved plans. Please reply to this email to confirm that the above information is incorrect. Thank you for your assistance. Carey 5/21/2007 FEB-15-2007 1022 SP INC 978 745 4881 P.01iO4 [PENGINEERING • TECHNOLOGY P.O. BOX 948•Salem,M"SachuSMS 01970•Telephone: 9711-745.4$89•Fax: 978-748.4881 FAX COVER SHEET °'awmw c'rw„ Sig 4.am uow cam ✓w.z Q-vae, �aw clr �� pyo oyny Cc coom ,, q 978 N.T liiipv f dbea® am aay q&wjA6w ua 4fi.4 4yee RAmw cwa at t& auodez a6r.� eel V. vrao�er _ It3�l'L.G� �rLrdttioaat greats FEB-15-2007 10:23 SP INC 978 745 4881 P.02iO4 Fax Transmittal HANCOCK ASSOCIATES 25+ Years of Excellence 185 Centre Street Civil Engineering Danvers, MA 01923 Land Surveying (978) 777-3050 / Fax: (976) 774- 7816 Environmental Consulting wwwMancoc"ssociares.cam Landscape Architecture . To: Bruce Poole From: Alfieri A.Taney,P.B Comp W.SP Engineering pages: 3 Fax: (978)745-4881 Data Febtuary 13,2007 Phone: (978)7454569 CC: lolm Dick.Project File Ren Email comment ngx=e Hw=ck Pmjm#: 13287 ❑Urvw a GFor rt ei.w ❑Mt tit p tetra.Raapq ®For your use ❑"One can r Coma tow Bru. Attached is Hancock's tesponse to the comments wgmding the 36-inch oudet pipe and the liner in the basis Contact me if you have mw questions. Al Tim Orbmadw corca wd A ft 4.v Rff&wM"ft CWO*Rri l MW&iftft4 d 9*fw the we"addneom Unau*wized UN.&dorm w coyybw u id*Pr0wbacd , c ,I y y t§ Sl AA � ■ Yi1 yam, .Ap L �i tiS�' a \ •l \ rNl cif X,g.. Nl . { # E V Y t `�Wj.jtMCQ, ,'� y fir!* •�' � v `•a3 �r�.. � k _ iti . wih % r �K�w! 'iM � � t y.�� ! \l.y k♦ x'fN. �:ieY�y,�,, L . ,•"t h?`' y"x q f `r �t s p t a`Y4f�""'#�" 'S , ii ,{h, yt t ' xf. s F @yam 1r s `y *�„t•�'Rr.\ ''�?tyv ;"F, ' _ "!t+ �a+l' r`�y?�' ,, tit Yi �y' "'_ r �yh � ��'��riR v {9s as .c. <�� ,�#�� a�.4 r.:. e" , t$•. sL' } s Vimf•K ' �_ ,Vt C':•:' rc i'!'r iv 4 fW,TV, g�;fn.Y � �+ K L +•).,,}'L t t "4 N C taP ;fir.» "�J "a xxtr`j ' iiwpti} °tY3 r iJ.J � jt r �^> x_1."1-0 `` YA',•� , ~LF A � � �� F4A bb sir � ��Ff Y.�ICy��a�� -�'R��IM1 r. � Sri - ryA 4,y�� •�` ti !r :t L� i`R Sri � re S o et d fk , z Ca � r4h ,, )�• g�yyn��' ,�y ^Y .�"_ � tt 3- Y5✓yr t � iy i �t`� 5f .' t .h�.,res i " q, � Y ,.y „�,#•• y�l � iR L Y a� Y')R��- i LI �}�1�1`v r �v'. 3 y ' 451,1' � Y3 + 2yk roM' r�+�',/ ` {,.''�L��c# i9'4 'Qv'• F e �'yX• �Ylr i�, '�' :. y, • 4 i'h. •A A��`5 4'° / J•t r, Yrk F 4�(Y�+j f < L y, �„ a � v'}�'i, p '1fr�4. �� !t �> •i i .7t Rd'/�� lt.. ` 'R1�w i1Yp u�y,' : ' S• j. A' � q,ro h � �''`.1 4{` � V t, y. $ 4 ^N /4 1 � FEW . r,5.� � •v F ••' 1 �} v }i yx f. i. q x W xv �+ ♦i s 4 ,''��.•-, ap ' ��.� i � v. twt y > t ,K a.,� t 3`Yr` ii �T>1T� d + L v �' ir• '\ \ Y ri wt e Z Ar • AaY �re a .? d t Y!�t'Nf�� i• a ;: I'i� e„... �A � � Vt' ` LFi YA AAY npt 2t ti q r1ri � ,i-f .'•''�� 4 f y�i 41:� s `�%yx u r .'r�� L t t};:r A a �4� i�'�.-m .., !.�' •4� Y I'�11��+ r�rif °r y �g[�y�ict Y'y(}t�.o,� + ,- s L' F - , 5:1q. r +` Fwrb�.- .�r�ry0 &ya;�� .e91 •-� �.� - '�L •r#.,' _l�,'�;'. A y to p 3 J ( r�yV��. � ^ S .� r•�•y '/r Ya (r ' 4l4 ,�• y - b r r � ,xy. �y?9yR,+,x .�f� r � �L .�T'�YR r�. �v� t:�';� �} .. t 4 sy � .t�''� r n1_i �yJ+. YS� Li �,a � �. Y+..Y�` �" R�f`y. �v�P ��` } L L d�a t`� �• v � k� sa'I t}�` �" F�, `'�+Ar°"�°R}t ra. •e•�•. + ,"�a}=�t` �. S.K•' 4�t '�` �� { yd S r s�}Ch � @t r' • L� + �3 �y� i� � SYr4 '`f4..y3' ..i tFvE�, tit` ;� q 4: r�'YW,�� + • #�a �.t�^jy}��^-v}' �'�i K'f k Jf�� L i 7'°+M Li t .: kyf., sr r x M. �} ,k rl, .. -� � r'3• Sy�I J !, 4 fir' XNO 3 r. +E' - yYd �•y.�t a fit. *s�. '• '3{ �� r"bl :`• ' f � rflf� v�r 1L Y .yti ,�v' �iyf�� {,�yy F _ �S"y`k , }'� `�i fsl'' 1d• '�' .1.'T. •¢,w a A �,y �_ _ '�"�� i .+.r'i'!♦'• �,�t♦�'�`�,�T. ty {#�r:.��c • � � "°vat s ��11� fl%f ��`%�� e� i:_ -�• r r* • �+ `., }mss tea" r` , ay •�`�'' r f♦ • � .YdM��Iy.;y±+R� y?' ,.�••<�. �- -a y .1}�-.' � Tom_ s _ A -. ...Y 3sP, �~ �'•"'. Ary tt F' � �� .�` }/ _ r•�� K it y'�"V/' i4 le • 'p" •o ,,� �f III - J .�•��S- r �."� �,•� ,µsJ i.at �S '�s •-t 3i p�r �.�.Tce ♦ s. a 4 � t p , +rwyl! 4 �� 7� X11 � �•'�"`x � i y r n N � ,sem ' � �'� �. � .♦� ._3 � - �" f ✓�e.c ` ]I �[ 4 P Ak t F f1T '�IY�•Y-1 � t�•� o � 'iS��•�t"/ L IM�'� w�.-}.I qi° �K � °` t �� ^�.c �i'� ins #^Y. P S: � ♦ .�$1�.G.�� i xti,• ,. �•L( 'earr` •ty � - ` a .y� K' i a>,q��h S,� P�^r '�4,, x '`t'�yF -.�. {,,> •�'"''" I f � rat.Y �� a',.,ai�yil� }`� '�.�,'r'''r�" 55 f t'a+• />�+�, �`,i.r# sii 'F:ty R� ��.�'�,F�Y�"fa^�r,��tt ��p�`�. • !" .o s � # j5��y�' �F♦ Nr. .i 4M`� �L w-M 0.At• /.':k 11. j+.4* a r i' 1.. rrtt...., r �e �:4, + � 1 ' �, ,c 'a 4`+'a` 5 M1 r y, 3 .:5"J iYy ` -.�•1 .va1. L f it". ' •.. fA� y^"4 �1 iF M`°•5 ..� .�FSS: '+:£• � � ��7`y`y�� .Cas.S„ .a`F'k�,.. .q,.. , Z, t �xSl ssm+^t`x !. a-. . •(d';-..` ra3.t a,•h i c -}�A.>:-�° fey -• �� ^%' 1 &{i,� a- ?� 1 �.ii�y 1 �•.; IN\✓{'J S f h rte,,i l• 'r ,! ! /3•t •t i�r � �;.+ ,�y� a g5fyryr�w€.��y',�t � d e f� •# bisy,,+�,','�;�A�c`�'��y'� a.t�Fi�+C"�•,'{�1i �=L' i�'d . +.r T'! +�'c�• � 7�' .. , i}� � � i � � SSA ; Ff #�'y .�•,..t. r�i:`�,y°r�^•� �y�,l�X,".S.�a��w�� ,�Y` p: � #r�!�V"� � . �i# �"�t..F'm+ .�� a�� cl��s w ice` i',.'K- •r, a� �r�`r��'z�y"2" S� r �, F} �4 L y. v t nC'�b4^sx ,� •.s•e '�R ,s�`+i'♦i'�h`t+j�"11.•g'3r. ,ra r .ti�aG� �i�",sR4,i Eg �_ �"t�v^+ f` ` ��y�� ., i�}��'� .t�Lff � �i1T+� i. ,Ta•''h�+ 4 Y��c�,` '1 w � R °`t✓ir PgP.��t � � y� � � �j�,ty'��3's� _ ��''• 1•�a '� 1. i 1 12 �� f 1 ss � �.a ' :�� a�a. `Y.ef�'q• �i��ic�9+' -�` `C"i a d,5 T.4 t , �+r 1 .s t'=?� 1� a�+ "?``k i 7t 2 a'±!w re+aL•�`' y,�. +gti� • #�..>r.$ �~� � �' `�- .al' i '. k L Exr' -5• - a�I PAR ,i : 'iib S 'a' � t c i �'� iLy_ A '�� ...0 � y s "� .yp,�1r � ;iw.�rn."'i+t, r� a Cis.'{• �e' �"� t d�l�ta7� 'R -� {. �R.' .� y,� ..Fry*{g_ •.g' .,jam -y 'L r �. � - rnf �Y%TQ�T � ax. 3Sf•1+S'+a'k.� � 4Y �.-. 3 �F er A` a iF -s4 rl + • < err � ' (�„q3� n �" �ti �i�h+�i� c,� � "�� ' .-,�"�` ` y ° �6,�. r f�'T�T � ��+•4, � r 7� �p$�C�}4t€� ••'A ��TM N �•l l4 ' R X�G ak i 5� p� 'bX'M'� a �'6':a it"ea Pt t \ r• 1 i (� '(�(' • Y e}.`,l R T't'! F' 2 1°�1{•S • L 1 is •,•♦ �A i i4� �'.� v i� i�tiaw j#i�'�i •}^>" -.C. ��' � ��a•. r}, w � iw f i �'p,t�. 1 {� ��ypati ,�r7.� r..,t w ,..: .• 7M �. i# ` ' + ��s�1k�G ra'�`44+NtS*�'. ,A Rw�. • 'F*. N:! . x as e�y� a a r. . t `Y. ..P \cj��'1�T 0"y 1�ep `, y A r r+r I , . 41 • ''�i'" �. 'T� .A`.�.. ��f l wv �+ `-,� r' ,q�y '•�` 4. '-:Pym � �'�;1'� � �t.. ,•'�' , . cam. • r p .!�%+"x, ,r�P �:� .. fi�I'' 2 "lL.� '` s ,L "" '*'!� w' �+Ft1 iTf f� • `� I... • r P . / + r ��i�Jggry ft t i 4. /pf! -.Y iJ�`t rP t P I '; s•'-.' i tom.,, G f!' ♦i'. h� l �f .� 'iy ;xN} tel}P ♦ ♦ 'T P�� '. ��"'A.�,�/�., ,ri / Y � " q�♦yam, `,l.� l'r, r' G-'. r� li.. -, 'i � I r /P�F, Y✓ Y Y ! � ��r��Y I, is :! Sf '� zEY �� P' �}its ,sw• ,.�,��j�y-("/,f t A r - t 1 ,1 .+� }'y !r i .. Y ♦ /,�// r fir.♦`p �fl f !� " � } �iL� 4 , f, !�'p j�tl •lam r i A � . ti r i M- i..A, iS di7•tsf}J"�ri;r- e �rr ✓ f MIA- A'(N (.. 9s !i y � 'J�'1(r�-0�s yy .��1'p� I � �tY.. .,pW� ^y ✓.off .Ps k .P � g��. � � � ,}til' _i+(>'�d �I��,��.�.i. r '�a's / r"y, ;":. 'g4 to I`a s'�.'!Li'$� /a � /� �P�a� 'r T "i) �x, {. ,ly->, ✓ r i,:'f,'ri�' r // F '�.� ♦.may .`';J!61 � _ r it �`..k� ♦ Y' ^..iil,� aT�*r .. !� arftr • `�F ti Y a F t ry9r � L y�r' w �'fu ;d,+is r fFf YIN r$r his �. n T ( a� s r 4 rf iSli (,/��u • � YY y�(( •�y{yye it y� j /♦' 1:Y' Fe rrY!F'T"! ..Pp. � w� . r 4 4 �14 H 4t Y 1yt 'Iy y . fr'I.s . y't�t L rr�T!. , � tf°,pf�• "'f� N.� ♦ r+' yrs,+•, ,:' "ff�,"tfSsti►moi J✓r � ��<✓�i.� tr 'w.��l..�. ��t �. � 'f �,� Y �y l r rfl. i 1 C Amended ACOP Page 1 of 1 Carey Duques From: Bogue,Gary (DEP) [Gary.Bogue@state.ma.us] Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 8:59 AM To: Carey Duques Subject: Amended ACOP vi. Stormwater best management practices (BMPs) shall be constructed according to the following plans, specification, and conditions. a. Permit Plans for 15 Robinson Road, 4 sheeets(PSI-PS4), dated February 5, 2007, by Hancock Associates for SP Engineering,Inc., stamped by Valack Talacko, PE. b. Modifications to the Detention Pond Outfall incorporating the use of a weir by SP Engineering, Inc., dated October 14, 2007. C. Revised Hydrologic Calculations by SP Engineering,Inc., dated October 12, 2007. d. Construction of the Stormwater BMPs shall be supervised by a Professional Engineer who shall be on-site during construction. e. A pre-construction meeting shall be held on the site to discuss the construction details and methodology with the Department, Conservation Commission, the property owners, and their engineering consultants in attendance. f. The Department and the Conservation Commission shall be notified two weeks prior to the commencement of construction. g. No later than one month after construction is over, the supervising engineer shall certify that the Stormwater BMPs were constructed according to the plans specified herein through the submittal of a written report to MaDEP copied to the Salem Conservation Commission. h. The Stormwater BMPs shall be monitored for a six-month period following the completion of construction to verify the proper operation of the Stormwater BMPs and correct any deficiencies in the operation of the BMPs. A final report by the consulting engineer shall be submitted to the Department and the Conservation Commission at the end of the six-month monitoring period describing the operation of the stormwater system, any deficiencies observed, and corrective actions taken. i. The operation and maintenance of the Stormwater BMPs shall be the responsibility of the property owner and shall be performed in conformance with the Department's Stormwater Policy. A revised maintenance schedule and cleaning plan for the detention pond shall be submitted to the Department prior to the commencement of construction taking into account the lined impermeable bottom of the basin. Records shall be kept documenting the BMP maintenance and shall be available for examination by the Department and the Conservation Commission. 11/26/2007 CITY OF SALEM + DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT KIN MERI.kY URISCOIJ, MAYOR 120 WAS111N(:1'ON$-REh'j $I\LIlA1,�Ii1.\5,\ll NSk PIS 01970 LYNN G(X)NIN DUNCAN,AICP THI.:978-619-5685 ♦ FAX:978-740.-0404 DIRN.CI'OR CERTIFICATION 1, Carey Duques, as Conservation Agent for the City of Salem, hereby certify that the attached are true copies of records in the possession of the City of Salem's Conservation Commission for real property at 15 Robinson Road and 75/120 Swampscott Road, Salem, Massachusetts. Signed under the pains and penalties of perjury this 7`hd4Z of May, 2007. Carey q s v MACCALLUM&SIMEGNE,P.A. RECEIVED ATTORNEYS AT LAW THE CITIZENS BANK BUILDING 385 BROADWAY,P.O.BOX 321 APR 2 4 2007 REVERE,MASSACHUSETTS 02151 DEPT.OF PLANNING& COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BERNARD J.MACCALLUM TELEPHONE:(781)286-1560 LAWRENCE A.SIMEONE,JR. FACSIMILE:(781)2865532 April 23, 2007 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED NO. 7006 2150 0001 0304 0959 Keeper of Records City of Salem Conservation Commission c/o City Solicitor 93 Washington Street Salem, MA 01970 Re: Mongiello, et al. v. Hutchinson, et al:f l Land Court N6. 06MISC330574, Consolidated with Essex Superior Court No 04-0870D Dear Sir or Madam: Attached please find a Keeper of the Record Subpoena with respect to the above matter. In lieu of appearing for deposition, you may respond by forwarding said records with a certification signed under the pains and penalties of perjury stating that the record are true and accurate. Kindly note the trial of this matter is scheduled for May 10, 2007, therefore your prompt attention to this matter would be greatly appreciated. Should there be a need for further information, please feel free to contact this office. Very t y yours, La rence A. Simeone, Jr. L S/lm Enclosure ' ) J COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS SUFFOLK, ss. LAND COURT DEPARTMENT Docket No06 MISC 330574 Consolidated with ESSEX SUPERIOR COURT Docket No.ESCV04-0870D' CARMINE MONGIELLO and ANGELO MONGIELLO PLAINTIFFS V. FREDRIC HUTCHINSON DBA A&H AUTO EXCHANGE AND A&H AUTO EXCHANGE, INC., FREDRIC HUTCHINSON, TRUSTEE OF FIFTEEN ROBINSON ROAD REALTY TRUST, JANE CANNING, TRUSTEE OF MOUNTAIN REALTY TRUST DEFENDANTS CARMINE MONGIELLO and ANGELO MONGIELLO PLAINTIFFS V. FREDRIC HUTCHINSON DBA A&H AUTO EXCHANGE AND A&H AUTO EXCHANGE, INC. DEFENDANTS Carmine Mongiello and Angelo Mongiello v. Fredric Hutchinson dba A&H, Auto Exchange and A&H Auto Exchange, Inc., Essex Superior Court Civil Action No. ESCV04-0870D, said matter has been joined to this case by interdepartmental order. -r M.R.C.P. RULE 30(a) AND RULE 45 DEPOSITION SUBPOENA TO: KEEPER OF THE RECORDS City of Salem Conservation Commission 93 Washington Street Salem,MA 01970 GREET/NGS: YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED in the name of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in accordance with the provisions of Rule 45 of the Massachusetts Rules of Civil Procedure to appear and testify on behalf of the Plaintiffs,Carmine Mongiello and Angelo Mongiello,before a Notary Public of the Commonwealth,at the office of Lawrence A. Simeone,Jr.,MacCallum&Simeone,P.A.,385 Broadway, Revere,MA 02151 on the 30"day of April,2007 at 1:00 p.m.and to testify as to your knowledge,at the trial of the above entitled action. And you are further required to bring with you: See Attached Schedule A. Hereof fail not as you will answer your default under the pains and penalties in the law in that behalf made and pro ed. Lawr nce A. Simeone, Jr. Mac Ilum&Simeone,P.A. 385 oadway,P.O. Box 321 Revere,MA 02151 (781)286-1560 (. BBO#552605 N ublic My Commission xpires: f SCHEDULE A Any and all records respecting the enforcement actions involving 15 Robinson Road and 75/120 Swampscott Road for any Carmine ,Mon ielloAngelo Mon 'ello and/or g g � Frederick Hutchinson. Page 1 of 1 Carey Duques From: Fairbrother, Mark (DEP) [Mark.Fairbrother@state.ma.us] Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 5:02 PM To: Carey Duques Cc: Frank Taormina; Joanne Scott Subject: RE: (no subject) Dear Recipients, Attached is a copy of a letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, Northeast Regional Office (MassDEP/NERO) regarding A&H Auto Exchange, Inc. in Salem, MA. The original was mailed to A&H today. If you have any questions regarding this document, please contact MassDEP/NERD Staff Person: Mark Fairbrother at (978) 694-3298. The attached Adobe Acrobat document is an electronic facsimile of a document on file with MassDEP. Thanks, Mark Fairbrother Environmental Analyst MassDEP/NERD BWP/Solid Waste Management 205B Lowell Street Wilmington, MA 01887 (978) 694-3298 for use in intra-agency policy deliberations 4/26/2007 A&H auto Page 1 of 1 Carey Duques From: Bogue,Gary (DEP) [Gary.Bogue @state.ma.us] Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 3:40 PM To: Carey Duques Cc: Tomczyk, Richard (DEP) Subject: A&H auto Hi Cary After seeing the site and then looking at the stormwater analysis, the submitted plan appears to be more of an initial design than a final. Firstly, the applicant's engineer needs to be a PE and plans need to be stamped and approved by him/her. The engineer needs to be familiar with DEP's Stormwater technical handbook for BMP design and the manual "Hydrology for Conservation Commissions". Some of the problems that I see are: 1. The subwatersheds or drainage catchments need to be delineated more clearly and flow paths identified. The 3 foot contour interval on the site plan may be too large for the topography on the site to identify flow paths and catchment areas. 2. The Rational Method is not usually used to calculate peak rates for runoff for detention basins. The NRCS TR- 20 model is normally used. 3. The detention basins are not designed according to the recommended designs in the DEP stormwater technical handbook. 4. The engineering of the detention ponds will have to be very conservative due to the huge volume of runoff they contain. 5. Were calculations made for the downstream culvert? That seems to be the controlling factor for discharge volumes and flood control. Also as I mentioned, the double grates at the culvert inlet may need to be removed, or at least one of them. I think the Commission needs to look at the design very carefully and ideally have an independent PE review the submitted plans. Gary </HTML 10/13/2006 I l�W/Jl, Y A7��V �$I�'•�Ysrr'• �.�w j t �t �' � , � � l< iU} � 41 ,"s"°' e'2+�i rtiPe� ,f��^ ''�t °1'��;t�3y','�r'"ri�., �*��r'�.M �.`5*cq �y� "��4+.� ,�it+t•µ� *� � �S•t�''"" .w��' �Za' .r a;'� ,l�� e^�� z�..`�i�;,��5 ��i x �i�'I#+,gr` �r;��;r„w+��r'9�i '*r. � �i"�RY � '� � ,{, � 6w 9 ��h�v{S dF�s o '"` �•"'k.\a., 4"t''+h$`p ��a�.ts,�`�� 6��'yi r.v�,��w.,��>;, *M1 �#. x + / 4u ; ,,.F�RY.e' �''-ww ?PL y s. d �e t_., 'y.`�iwA 'l•`' W rR�i. .� ..� s' .ww ,:, '}*n .+ #." �*'Yl✓ ,�^ "k«�1'. y� ti�, �-.'C3;i `x» ;ss v Y S� �F rr�* cr a..i'h� i j :moi�+�y�'4�'�^t'k.6 rev%. y� ♦�r, � �i. ` 5.'n., ? i� r�"`:.e �iwatiA+.•q.�'kyj+ iv, .r tly i.rrt,'�`" p .ki " 'x` 4^✓?Ri'•*"f .SR t ,-.tis' 1 �'h�a�+adYav''�: Mt .fi .epi}: �a�C�j'��1�,•._ +.{ �+JY;C, 3 1? s � ��F Yt�� "�1* 4 m°r� iC.P. i e� ' V'Aa .Y!_ n t IJ SI• 'fl'` F°.J._swaw _. 4f.. 'IYw'�. 3+ � - �`1 'b T-�2r�" `' f�.:.�i, • �� S �,.�. _ _.1,� �/y ys.�.v,� �" „yg ' . f, •*yeJ _ a' ec + n,.�s�. ' ddb-�A" �" - '>�f" _ pAy yFS "'n�rw.w�4n��___ s�'+�_' SE � a �y r tea•`��_'�� 'n''.y'33'4 �" __ .--- .r..�yn� t � 'F a ,'1;��,.�n �3 � +,�...�y„o;i'.r1'�ax �rv+tt. a,$ y�'�9•'�. w%- „` rRX r ✓ � t .7i? � 'Vr. . e � f.'; y�P.r yr to � t. '� � °. .... k 4t'-yR°F jJ r ,) _)�Z�• l✓� li t r sywv ls {+Q�71 �/ k �fi-._ 4 .;yry r �•t$$.r✓{� "'hvHr rLe a.2 W1 ��^ 7i,Y3F IV � ✓ ` �„'2"^ .SyL•7)•'�}a�\m� i.+�FS��3.t1'�,_ �� . Arry() +�\y'{j Y �:,• '` 1 ,„ • _ � `4af 'I d>y� •ir J §yf 7t Pi. 3 § 'r owl '+:' slw a: T ' t . ...#F1 {��-r 'Y' G°• , �'i ,aq.' c r Tl..rWA� 'RWic'�a/yy. q. r t .!� y � ;1 41 �6 Via-. \ �V "!�'. 4�( Ssr ,jj,.7^; 55 r x ire �'4S� t- '2�Y (F • ,� c'+��k* ,/ y„ '?IfNt;�� / _- rr 1'li .. FENGINEERING, INC. P.O. Box 848 • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 •Telephorief 07tta45.-4569 - Fax: 978-745-4881 November 20, 2012 Mr. Gary Bogue r " ' 1 733 WETLANDS DEPT a „ DEP Northeast Regional Office 205B Lowell Street s � d Wilmington, Ma 01887 Re: A+H Auto Parts 15 Robinson Rd. Salem,Ma 01970 Dear Mr. Bogue, I have prepared this letter to respond to some of the items we discussed during the site meeting on September 23, 2012. The main purpose of the meeting with the Mongiellos, Tom Devine and A+H Auto Parts representatives was to examine the erosion caused by the 3" flash storm event and discuss possible mechanisms to prevent the flooding again. There are also DEP approved work items from 2007 that need to get back on track which include Site berming, BMP improvements and detention basin construction. Among the work items that may be presented for an Amendment to the existing Consent Order from 2007 are: 1. Replace the 2'x3' stone culvert under Robinson Rd. with a larger precast pipe with a bar screen to prevent clogging. Recalculate upstream and downstream flows with hydro cad modeling. 2. Rebuild/maintain the drainage ditch beside Robinson Rd. where it was eroded and breached during the storm. Use larger rip rap on the exterior bank of the ditch imbedded in crushed stone and asphalt grindings. Prepare plan and cross section details of ditch and new culvert for DEP and contractors. 3. Reanalyze the sizing of the approved detention basin because of an approximately 1/3 reduction in land area used for car and metal storage. The hill closest to the brook is now used to house 12 horses, 3 ponies and 4 goats. The company is getting out of the automobile salvage business because the competition for the cars left is expensive. The hydrocad modeling will be recalculated to design the modified detention pond, with velocity fore bay and grassy Swale the same as in the original submittal. 4. The other consideration we discussed on site was the need for an expensive lined basin when there is 6-8' of soil over ledge in this area that would percolate runoff and contaminants before flowing-to the brook 30' away. During low intensity rain events or thunderstorms the basin would not fill up and over flow directly to the brook but infiltrate for groundwater recharge. Large rain events(>25yr. storm)would still overflow a weir into a rip rap spillway before entering the brook. While the detention pond will decrease localized flooding, it is only a small(<20%) percentage of the runoff generated in the watershed. The resource area is an intermittent brook draining 0.23 sq.miles of watershed (<I.0 A threshold) and is not subject to the River Act. The client would like to clear the former trails and upper Robinson Rd. for passive recreation such as horse back riding. Compared to the hundreds of cars that were stored on the property in 2005, the scrap steel and 25 vehicles currently present do not have the contaminant loading potential that would warrant a lined basin. Basin soils would be tested annually for EPH, VPH and metals to evaluate loading and the need for periodic removal. We propose to prepare the technical data and blueprints for these work items in the winter and submit an amendment to the DEP for review. Please call if you have any questions. Very Truly Yours, Bruce M. Poole President, S P Engineering Inc. cc Tom Devine, Con. Com. ��pN01Tgq�� r � CITY OF SALEM CONSERVATION COMMISSION SITE VI IT FORM PROJECT LOCATION: S IC � S DATE OF SITE VISIT• °�� /� PROJECT PROPONENT: DEP FILE NUMBER: S 4— 3 W ,v\6A'"9)) PROPOSED WORK: IN ATTEN_ �� Commission Members/Agent•-/ d--, Abutters: " Applicant/Property Owner/Representative: Snit' }'uVUI A=4 Q -) LSITE VISITPURPE tea, ❑Request for Determination ❑Abbreviated Notice of Resource Area Delineation ❑Notice of Intent ❑<Certiificate of Compliance ❑Enforcement/Violation ❑Emergency Informal INLAND RESOURCE AREAS COASTAL RESOURCE AREAS ❑Bank ❑ Land Subject to Coastal ❑Land Under the Ocean Storm Flowage ❑Bordering Vegetated Wetland ❑ Designated Port Area ElCoastal Beach El Land Subject to Flooding ❑ Coastal Dune ❑Barrier Beach ❑Land Under Water Bodies or Waterway Name: ❑ Coastal Bank ❑Rocky Intertidal Shore ❑Riverfront Area ❑ Salt Marsh ❑ Land Under Salt Pond ❑Vernal Pools ❑ Land Containing ❑Anadromous/Cata- Shellfish dromous Fish Run ❑Bordering Vegetated Wetland in Coastal Area ❑Water Body ❑ Bordering Vegetated Wetland ❑ Bank ❑ Coastal Beach ❑Coastal Dune INTERESTS.PRQT.ECTED. ,,. A 4 d ❑Protection of Water Supply ❑ Protection of Groundwater Supply ❑Flood Control ❑Storm Damage Prevention ❑Prevention of Pollution E]Protection of Fisheries ❑ Protection of Wildlife Habitat ❑Protection of Land Containing Shellfish Is this an exempt project: If so,why? Are resource area boundaries delineated correctly? If not,explain. SITE VISIT:�'DQCUMENTATIQN_ :., ❑Photos ❑ Site Map ❑Other: �OBSERVATIbNS� r� � - v,,mx , . !a,<, _ _ �_�,:�_�•,. Take intoWaccount�relevant aspects or features such as: natural or piped drainage or obvious pollution; topography; existing vegetation; possible alternative sites; signs of wildlife, possible vernal pools, rare species habitat; landmarks; recent or historical disturbances; proximity to other water bodies or drainage areas; adjacent land uses. Sfi, - . � s,4, ,y '-' 1 L\ ,�. Pry �o Su �; RECEIVED Law Office of JUN 15 2010 PATRICK J. DeIULIS DEPT.OF PLANNING& 31 Collins Street Terrace COMMUNIrr DF✓FI 0PkAF` Lynn, Massachusetts 01902 Telephone(781) 595-8677 Facsimile(781) 593-7840 e-mail: pdemlis@deiulisbrothers.com June 14, 2010 Mr. Frederick Hutchinson 15 Robinson Road Salem, Massachusetts 01970 RE: Work on Robinson Road in Violation of Land Court Judgment Dear Mr. Hutchinson: As you know, I represent your neighbors /abutters, Cannine and.Angelo Mongiello. In May, 2007, following years of costly litigation to my clients that resulted from.your actions with regard to Robinson Road, an agreement was reached that was incorporated into the judgment entered by the Land Court. I have enclosed a copy of the Judgment for your information. It is our position that you are presently in violation of this Judgment and that the Mongiello's are entitled to seek injunctive relief from the Land Court. The purpose of this letter is to attempt to avoid the necessity of further legal action by coining to an agreement with respect to your present activities in and on Robinson Road. Over the past decade you have raised the grade on your property to the point that it is now several feet higher than the Mongiello's property. In significant rain events, of which there have been many, the brook that runs between the properties and then through and under the Mongiello'sP P Y ro ert has overtopped, flooding their property and the homes along Robinson Road. In an effort to mitigate the flooding, the Mongiello's, again at great expense to themselves, filed plans with the Salem Conservation Commission to install a filtration barrier and make improvements to the culvert where the brook enters their property. Over the past year, without consulting with the Mongiello's and to our knowledge without obtaining any approvals from the City of Salem, you have raised the grade on.Robinson Road to the point that it is at least'one to two feet higher than it was before. What the Mongiello's worked so hard to mitigate, you have now simply pushed the runoff further downstream. More troubling, however,is the material that you have used to build up the road. Our observations are that the material is reclaimed asphalt that has not been properly compacted and that no topcoat has been installed. The result is that in even moderate rain events the material washes out, some of it onto the Mongiello's property and into the brook. Of greater concern, however, is significant quantity that washes down to and onto Swampscott Road, creating a hazard for passing motorists. Mr. Frederick Hutchinson June 14, 2010 Page 2 I am hopeful that we can address this situation to the satisfaction of botharties. Please p contact me within seven (7) days of the date of this letter so we can arrange a meeting. If you are unwilling or we are unable to come to a mutual understanding and agreement, the Mongiello's will be forced to seek court intervention. I look forward to hearing from you. :Very truly Y o •s Patrick DeIulis Attorney for Carmine and Angelo Mongiello Enclosure - Land Court Judgment cc: Carmine &Angelo Mongiello w/encl. Elizabeth Renard, Esq., City of Salem Solicitor w/ encl. Thomas St. Pierre, City of Salem Building Inspector/Zoning Enforcement Officer w/ encl. David Knowlton, P.E., City of Salem Engine w/ encl. Salem Conservation Commission v encl. ........ .. . . GO/1G/ LGG/ GJ:GG 1/61L600�JG pjOt LHw Urril uu u I �l COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS SUFFOLK, ss. LAND COURT DEPARTMENT Docket No06 MISC 330574 Consolidated with ESSEX SUPERIOR COURT Docket NO .ESCV04-0870D' CARMINE MONGIELLO and ANG.ELOMONGIELLO ESSEX SOUTH REGISTRY DISTRICT PLAINTIFFS JOHN L. O'BRiEN, JR. /REGISTRY OF DEEDS V. DATE FREDRIC HUTCHINSON DBA A&II AUTO EXCHANGE ANDA&Ii RECEIVEDO'CLOCK�M� AUTO EXCHANGE; INC.,FREDRIC HUTCHINSON,'.TRUSTEE OF FIFTEEN BK S' PG ROBINSON ROAD REALTY TRUST, JANE CANNING, TRUSTEE OF MOUNTAIN REALTY TRUST DEFENDANTS 30 el ti l CARMINE MONGIELLO and ANGELO MONGIELLO PLAINTIFFS V. r ria ST cf-RnFY ori �y °7 INATTI-* F.REDRIC HUTC.HTNSON DBA A& ? ETXGO?�G n0CL+ate"'is d POLL, AUTO EXCHANGE AND A&PI TAI, AND CORRECT C045Y TI4R - OW-MAL ON FILE IN My CFFfCE AUTO EXCHANGE, INC. AfID W MY LEGAL CUSTODY. DEFENDANTS ,gNWIVIARIE J. BREL COt1Rp pec e� Carmine Mongiello and Angelo Mongiello v, Fredric Hutchinson dba A&H; Auto Exchange and A&H Auto Exchange, Inc., Essex Superior Court Civil Action No. ESCV04-0870D, said matter has been joined to this case by interdepartmental order. 1 JUDGMENT This Judgment is entered as of this__day of May 2007,binding FREDERICK 1IUTCHTNSON,individually, dba A.&H Auto Exchange,as Trustee of Fifteen Robinson Road Realty Trust, and as Trustee of Mountain Realty Trust(wherein Jane Canning has resigned as Trustee and the beneficiaries have recently appointed Idutchinson—see attached appointment and acceptance attached.hereto),A &H Auto Exchange,Inc., a Massachusetts corporation, all of 15 Robinson Road, Salem, MA including all their agents, successors and assigns and CARMINE MONGIELLO, of 55 Eastman Avenue, Swampscott,MA and ANGELO MONGIELLO, of 57 Prospect Street, Swampscott,MA. The above persons and entities may be collectively referred to herein as the"Parties", each having the authority and any and all required approvals to request the Court to enter said Judgment. htECITALS WHEREAS, certain of the Parties all have interests in and to the real estate as shown on the plan entitled "Exhibit Phar. of Land in Salem,MA, Scale V--50% dated December 28, (t) 01 2004,Hancock Associates" as well as shown oh,, Land Court Plan 366351),vPartial , Topographical Site Plan, November 24, 2004,Parsons and Faia an,d-Mountain Realty Trust Property, IS Robinson Road,Salem, MA, Griffin Engineering,Preliminary Subdivision Plan of Assessor's Map 6 Lot##13, Marcb 30-01 attached hereto ("the Plans") and incorporated herein, as follows: 2 'OU/1VI LUU! UJ.uU 1101 LOOJ JJL 1`10.') LHW urrl4Go fHVC V41U, 1. Frederick Hutchinson, is the Trustee of Fifteen Robinson Road Realty Trust, under a Declaration of Trust dated October 8,2003 and filed with the Land Registration Office of the Essex South District Registry of Deeds,which owns the real estate shown on the Plan as a portion of"Robinson Road"(established as Lot A in.Land Court Plan 3635D), by two deeds (1) Cynthia Lee McArdle, et als to Frederick Hutchinson,Trustee of Fifteen Robinson Road Realty Trust, filed with the Land Registration.Office of said Registry as Document No. 455011 and(2)Muriel.B. Little to Frederick Hutchinson, Trustee of Fifteen.Robinson Road Realty Trust, filed with the Land Registration Office of said Registry as Document No. 455012, both as noted on Certificate of Title No. 78516; and 2. Frederick Hutchinson is Trustee of Mountain Realty Trust, under a Declaration of Trust dated June 7, 1984 and recorded with said Registry in Book 7428, Page 95, as, amended, and is the owner of the real estate shown as "Area=9.72 acres+" on the Plan, by deed dated June 7, 1984 and recorded with said Registry in Book 7428, Page 100, also known as 15 Robinson Road; and 3. Carmine Mongiello and Angelo Mongiello are the owners of the real estate, shown as "Carmine &Angelo Mongiello" on the Plan, by deed from Clinton A. Broderick and Gertrude C. Broderick recorded at Book 5475 Page 185, Essex County Registry of Deeds and Certificate of Title No. 37654. WHEREAS, the Parties are engaged in the following lawsuits: Moneiello v. Hutchinson, PL9S Essex Superior Court, Civil Action No. No. 04-0870.D and Mongiello v. Hutchinson, et als,Land Court 06 MISC. 330574 which have been consolidated in the 3 Land Court. Said litigation involving the determination of rights in Robinson Road as such way is shown on the Plans. WHEREAS, the Parties to this Judgment agree that it is in each of their best interests to, resolve their disputes without further delay and the expense associated with litigation; along with the Parties intention to exist and operate without interference from one another so long as there is a reasonable use of their respecting land. IT IS ORDERED 1. That Carmine Mongiello and Angelo Mongietlo established by their title have the right to pass and re-pass over Robinson Road, a registered easement, for all purposes of which roadways can be used without limitation or interference, appurtenant to their property as shown on the Plans without interference by any of the other Parties hereto; 2. That Fredrick Hutchinson as Trustee of Fifteen Robinson Road Realty Trust and as Trustee of Mountain Realty Trust established by his title have the right to pass and re-pass over Robinson Road, for all purposes of which roadways can be used without limitation or interference, as shown on the Plans without interference by any of the other Parties hereto; 3. That Fredrick Hutchinson,Trustee as aforesaid, shall forthwith remove any and all barriers and or materials presently existing on Robinson Road to ensure clear and unobstructed use of the roadway and should Fredrick Hutchinson fail to remove any and all barriers and or materials presently existing on Robinson Road then in said event upon the sole and exclusive election of the Mongiellos as authorized by this judgment; the 4 - -- - - -- ----------- _..,. -. ---- Mongiellos may go upon Robinson Road and remove said barriers without interference from amy and all of the Parties hereto. 4. That by this judgment a permanent injunction is issued prohibiting any of the Parties herein from Ru Cher encumbering, obstructing or making Robinson Road impassible and not able to be used by one another 4as this judgment has established. 5. That the Mongiellos and Fredrick Hutchinson, Trustee as aforesaid, only shall be allowed to improved, repair;widen,pave'and or install utilities in Robinson Road, with notice as set forth herein required to one another.. The Patties shall use their best efforts to notify one another in writing at least twenty-one (21) .days prior to commencing work by mailing such notice by first class mail to 15 Robinson Road; Salem,MA 01970; G. A breach of this Judgment will cause immediate and irreparable injury. The 5 Parties' remedies at law will be inadequate in the case of any such breach,which shall entitle the non breaching party to injunctive relief. In the event that a Party is found to Have breached this Judgment by a Court,damages and reasonable attorney fees,are to be awarded to the non-breaching party. 7. This Judgment is final and may be amended only (1)by the Court as justice and equity requires or(2)by an agreement in writing signed by all of the Parties and approved by the Court. This Judgment does not estop the parties from entering into an agreement to allow for the existence of the locked gate at the beginning of Robinson Road and Swampscott Road. 8. This Judgment is binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the Parties hereto, their respective agents,representatives, assigns and successors in interest. 5 9. Each Party has cooperated in the drafting and preparation of this Judgment. 10.. This Judgment shall take effect immediately forthwith. Orderecj his day of May, 2007: Justice A/4 AJlauGu 6 Page 1 of 1 Carey Duques From: David Knowlton Sent: Friday, September 04, 2009 11:27 AM To: Carey Duques Subject: 100 120 swamscott rd drainage improvements -not wft8raal\ �e J ap��Ta v �C ti le w�r� w w a c� 1 C f •/C� Hi Carey, please eeatiauathis noi., _ pt mber242-099 aT that time tha r t� i66 am. Thanks david David H. Knowlton,P.E. Chty Engineer City of Salem,Nlas'whmetts 126 Wash ngton Street Salem,M sa husetts 02170 V:978,745.9593 F; 978.745.0319 dknov.'l*�onr)sa(etv,con) 9/4/2009 Continuation of a Public Hearing—Notice of Intent—DEP#64-426—A & H Auto Exchange Inc., 15 Robinson Road, Salem, MA. The purpose of this hearing is to discuss the construction of stormwater control structures located within a buffer zone to an inland bank and BVW and culvert a portion of an intermittent stream, pursuant to a DEP Consent Order, at 15 Robinson Road. Comments: Carey: Well this project is never dull. On Monday May 21, 2007 I received a call from Elizabeth Sabounjian from DEP wetlands enforcement division. She informed me that the Consent Order that was issued was to be handled by DEP and that a NOI did not need to be filed with the local Commission. She will call Bruce Poole and recommend that the NOI be withdrawn and that DEP oversee the project going forward. This will allow Elizabeth and DEP to set specific deadlines for A & H to comply with. The Commission is able to report any violations to DEP but DEP will be reviewing the proposal and approving the final plan for addressing the wetland concerns. The Commission will receive a copy of the approved plans and they will be available for the public to review. However, there is no appeal process for a consent order so what DEP approves will be the final plan. Continuation of Public Hearing—Notice of Intent—DEP #64-426— A & H Auto Exchange Inc., 15 Robinson Road, Salem,MA. The purpose of this hearing is to discuss the construction of stormwater control structures located within a buffer zone to an inland bank and BVW and culvert a portion of an intermittent stream, pursuant to a DEP Consent Order, at 15 Robinson Road. Comments: Carey: • Due to quorum issues I asked the applicant to re-advertise and re-notify abutters. This means that the applicant will need to explain the full project, which should not be a concern b/c the project has changed significantly as you will see. • I met with Bruce Poole and John Dick on Thursday Feb. 15 to discuss the project. Below is an outline of the items we discussed. • I requested that plans be provided in a larger scale 1"=20' and include hay bale line, test pit locations, and wetland markers. John Dick is going to document that the stream is intermittent on the current USGS map and that the 100' buffer line was confirmed by aerial topography • The proposed pond was designed to catch runoff within two proposed subcatchment 1_ areas. You'll notice on the plans the proposed re-grading divides subcatchment area �( 2S into 2S, 6S, and 5S. The pond will address runoff within 2S and 6S. • There are two swales leading into the pond. I recommend asking for more information for Swale 1, is it grassy Swale, lined with rip rap, etc? The plan shows that swale 2 has a rip rap forebay as well as a grassy swale. \t' According to Bruce and John the 9" berm located between the scale and Swale 2, will be made of excavated material taken from the site; I also expressed concern about potential erosion around the end of the berm where the stormwater will be directed into Swale 2. w\ The proposed system removes 80% of Total Suspended Solids, the minimum amount l required by DEP. The 36" pipe proposed to exit from the detention pond to the brook does not treat the water, it simply conveys the stormwater from the pond to the brook. Please note it's also located 5 inches from the bottom of the pond. The rate at which the runoff will \ enter the brook concerns me. Bruce mentioned possibly adding a baffle with oil absorbent log at pipe outfall, the plans will need to include these details if added. I recommend the cormnission consider requiring cement headwalls around the pipes to prevent erosion as well as helping to identify where the pipes are. I recommend requesting a soil management plan be submitted Scale House and Associated Ramps • DEP upheld the appeal and recommended that the applicant withdrawal the RDA application and include the ramp as part of this NOL So I've asked Bruce to include the ramp information but discuss it after reviewing the pond proposal so we don't get too confused. • Some key items will be the run off calculations for pre and post the installation of the ramp. • The original proposal stated the ramp will be temporary but the new proposal is not any different, so it appears that the jersey barriers will stay and the grade of the road will not change. • A building permit will need to be acquired if the height of the structures exceeds 4'. • The Commission had requested a sump pump be installed once the stormwater ponds were installed, would you still like to see these? (e-M" Ma m a« IA Com. - U-L . 1 `. a 41 35 . OA Ir �� ►nom- ,,�° � �� Page 1 of 1 Carey Duques From: Brucepoolesp@aol.com Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 11:18 AM To: Carey Duques Cc: jdick@hancockassociates.com Subject: A+ H Auto NOI 64-426 revised pond design Dear Carey, I had the chance to talk to Gary today at DEP. He said the best way to handle the RDA was to have the applicant withdraw the application which removes the appeal. We should include in the letter that the truck scale ramps have been incoporated into the revised NOI and that the runoff from the area enters swale two and flows to the detention pond. SC 5 still flows to the road but SC4+ 2 are captured. He asked if the downstream culvert is the limiting factor (15") then at which event does it overflow the road, and does the 36" pipe contribute to the overload sooner than a 18" pipe? He mentioned that the retention times at low flow events should be compared because the volume the pond is holding at a ten year storm ( depth 1.6 ) is less than one-third of the pond capacity. He mentioned multiple outlets at different depths would allow the pond to hold runoff longer and still prevent berm overflow. The other items we discussed at the 2-15-07 meeting were; 1. will the water under the truck scale flow overland to the 9" ditch or is a pipe or pump necessary. 2. the plans should have a baffle ( approx. 8'wide and 2.5' high ) and concrete headwall detail for the outlet pipe. 3. John was going to document that the stream is intermittant on the current USGS survey, and that the 100' buffer line was confirmed by aerial topography. 4. the Con. Com. would like a larger plan of the BMP area ,1 to 20 scale, and have the hay bale line, BVW area, test pit locations and the outlet structure shown. Also will the 9" berm beside the road need a rock face or end to prevent erosion? 5. the Soil Management Plan will be submitted at the preconstruction meeting and the Water Quality monitoring plan is in the revised BMP document. (SP Inc.) Thanks for your help and input, Bruce 2/16/2007 led tai �:c TV Am T� by __ , . _.. � i �. .. i :.. , , . - -- - s , 't E ��_ � �, , .y , .. .w3i � � ` t,i,, i. ' .�'i } � � f .4' i e . .. 1 I J ,� i t369 oe4 - 7 f-t g CLb44 t-5+-4m— /3 5f Ore , L5 416, x .-+s l 1. I Al, � 4 „ { s � r i I f l Lcau - f LQWA - wA� _. _. - -_ __ --- ------ - - _ __ ----- - - - ---- -t------- , , . _ _______ __ -. _ _. _.1__-._.�-�_.. v_ � y,_ �n �_ � , .. f_�".t� .. .J`. ,, r 1 i� �.z _._ �..___.._ _. _�_�-.�_. � �. .,.t..._.._ _. _ ! � 1 .. _ _.. _... _._. ____.__ _. .� ..._. -. ..,._. �___ i ____ � +v r .. _. �._�_._.___��_ ..._�...__._. ._�. �_ .—.�_�.___ � �.._r._..._ .,_._. a __� __ _ __ _ __ _ __ _ - -------- --_.._._. ---_ _. _ _ . _. _ r_. __ .� --- W ,i . r __tom __ � __._.�._ ...�J.. �-__ � ' + � � . ` Is ,r y 1 Y � .CFf _ �_.. .i` ...�_ _. —y—�....__�..— �__.. _._.___.. __ ' F `� e _ _�.__ ��_ ,�..�-�. _. ..e.�—.�_._�. � � _..� . .__.� .. __ ._._ _ �._..___.__..__..� —r—.�_�. f. r �� J,: _. .._—__..+.rN�_ _�_.____ _._. .+-.�___. __�.� ... ��:. .ti F w :. i - . . � ..... �_� _. _. 1_m .__�_ _.A___ ___ _ _ ,. � �_ �.'L.�. _ _ _ �_�_.—.. _� ..�.� P _ �.—_._ l�� .� � ... w �. n A �� I Ajo .a-1-0 CIA 36 '' nn ;i ��I - _ Ctd 1 Di lii r: D17 fQ I I!i � i III !i! iII Continuation of Public Hearing—Notice of Intent—DEP #64-426— A & H Auto Exchange Inc., 15 Robinson Road, Salem, MA. The purpose of this hearing is to discuss the construction of stormwater control structures located within a buffer zone to an inland bank and BVW and culvert a portion of an intermittent stream, pursuant to a DEP Consent Order, at 15 Robinson Road. Comments: Carey: • Due to quorum issues I asked the applicant to re-advertise and re-notify abutters. This means that the applicant will need to explain the full project, which should not be a concern b/c the project has changed significantly as you will see. • I met with Bruce Poole and John Dick on Thursday Feb. 15 to discuss the project. Below is an outline of the items we discussed. • I requested that plans be provided in a larger scale 1"=20' and include hay bale line, test pit locations, and wetland markers. • John Dick is going to document that the stream is intermittent on the current USGS map and that the 100' buffer line was confirmed by aerial topography • The proposed pond was designed to catch runoff within two proposed subcatchment areas. You'll notice on the plans the proposed re-grading divides subcatchment area 2S into 2S, 6S, and 5S. The pond will address runoff within 2S and 6S. • There are two swales leading into the pond. I recommend asking for more information for Swale 1, is it grassy swale, lined with rip rap, etc? The plan shows that Swale 2 has a rip rap forebay as well as a grassy Swale. • According to Bruce and John the 9"berm located between the scale and Swale 2, will be made of excavated material taken from the site; I also expressed concern about potential erosion around the end of the berm where the stormwater will be directed into Swale 2. • The proposed system removes 80% of Total Suspended Solids, the minimum amount required by DEP. • The 36" pipe proposed to exit from the detention pond to the brook does not treat the water, it simply conveys the stormwater from the pond to the brook. Please note it's also located 5 inches from the bottom of the pond. The rate at which the runoff will enter the brook concerns me. • Bruce mentioned possibly adding a baffle with oil absorbent log at pipe outfall, the plans will need to include these details if added. • I recommend the commission consider requiring cement headwalls around the pipes to prevent erosion as well as helping to identify where the pipes are. I recommend requesting a soil management plan be submitted Scale House and Associated Ramps • DEP upheld the appeal and recommended that the applicant withdrawal the RDA application and include the ramp as part of this NOI. So I've asked Bruce to include the ramp information but discuss it after reviewing the pond proposal so we don't get too confused. • Some key items will be the run off calculations for pre and post the installation of the ramp. • The original proposal stated the ramp will be temporary but the new proposal is not any different, so it appears that the jersey barriers will stay and the grade of the road will not change. • A building permit will need to be acquired if the height of the structures exceeds 4'. • The Commission had requested a sump pump be installed once the stormwater ponds were installed, would you still like to see these? dot 6 - - �- I , lc ba WLV- oo�va Lki okry i4 - , l fcoNar � , , R CITY OF SALEM 3 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Elizabeth Sabounjian Department of Environmental Protection 205 Lowell Street Wilmington, MA 01887 June 15,2007 Re: Administrative Order of Consent Wetlands Protection Act Violation located at 15 Robinson Road,Salem, MA Sent via Certified Mail 7005 3110 0000 7176 7148 Email: Elizabeth.Sabounjian@state.ma.us Dear Ms. Sabounjian: This letter is in response to the determination made by the Department of Environmental Protection on May 212007 stating that the proposed work at 15 Robinson Road falls under the sole review of the DEP per the Administrative Consent Order with Penalty (ACOP)that was issued on November 14 2005,therefore excusing the local Conservation Commission from issuing an Order of Conditions. As a result of this determination the applicant requested and received a withdrawal without prejudice from the Salem Conservation Commission of the Notice of Intent application on May 24 2007. Given that the application was originally filed with the Conservation Commission on July 13 2006 and the Commission has devoted many hours to reviewing various iterations of this project,the Conservation Commission is submitting this letter summarizing its concerns with the proposed project. Main concerns include the quality and quantity of the stormwater that is entering the adjacent stream uncontrolled, construction of the approved stormwater control structure,and maintenance of the approved structure. The comments listed below are based on the last version of the project that the Conservation Commission reviewed during its regularly scheduled meeting on February 22 2007 (see attached). The Commissions main concerns included the following: • Evidence that the stormwater from the northern portion of the site does not contribute to the runoff entering the stream. Concerns include having additional sediment carried and deposited into the wetlands. In order to clarify this the Commission requested 2 foot contours as opposed to 10 foot contours. As a result the plans failed to specifically identify which areas contribute to the proposed storage area/detention basin. • Plans that lacked information such as the location of the 100 year flood elevation. • Installation of an uncontrolled 36" diameter outfall pipe that empties stormwater into the stream. • Construction of ramps leading to the existing scale without stormwater concerns being addressed first. Along those lines constructing earth berms adjacent to the ramp due to erosion, contributing to the sedimentation of the stream and destruction by plows and other machinery. • Need for a maintenance plan for the proposed retention pond and associated BMP structures. • Detailed plans at 20 foot scale to clearly identify the lines of delineated wetlands, buffer zone, current grading and proposed re-grading. • Proper oversight of the construction of the approved stormwater control and BMP structure(s). Ideally the oversight will include a Licensed Site Professional and a Licensed Engineer. The Commission appreciates the opportunity to express its concerns to DEP and looks forward to the improvement and eventual restoration of this area of wetlands located along the property at 15 Robinson Road. Please feel free to contact the Conservation Agent, Carey Duques 978-619-5685 or the Chairman, Kevin Cornacchio 978479-3295 with any questions or concerns. Sincere] Carey Duq s Conservatio Agent/Staff Planner on behalf of the Salem Conservation Commission Cc: Kevin Comacchio, Chairman Lynn Duncan, Director Planning and Community Development Mike Ferris,A&H Auto (sent via email) Encl. May 23, 2007 Carey Duques Salem Conservation Commission 120 Washington Street Salem, MA 01970 Re: A&H Auto Exchange, 15 Robinson Road, Salem, NOI ,DEP#64-426 Dear Mz. Duques, On behalf of my client A&H Auto Exchange, I have prepared this correspondence to respectfully request to withdraw without prejudice the application for the Notice of Intent filed in February 2007 for the construction of Stormwater Control Strutures. I have been contacted by Elizabeth Sabounjian of the DEP Wetlands Enforcement Division who pointed out that the ACOP supersedes the need for an NOI because BMP is in the consent order. There is also the concern at the State level that the process has been bogged down by unnecessary requests and appeals. They have reviewed the technical package and feel it is sufficient to proceed with minor outfall changes and will issue the permit shortly to keep us on schedule. She mentioned that since this is redevelopment of existing conditions all they can require is "maximum feasible compliance" and we have met that condition. Please call if you have any questions. Very truly yours, SP Engineering, Inc. A&H Auto Exchange Inc. Bruce M. Poole Michael Ferris President BMP/cr CC: Mike Ferris James Rogal, Esquire ` COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION METROPOLITAN BOSTON/NORTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE 205B LOWELL STREET, WILMINGTON, MA 01887 978-694-3200 MITT ROMNEY STEPHEN R.PRITCHARD Governor Secretary KERRY HEALEY ROBERT W.GOLLEDGE,Jr. Lieutenant Governor Commissioner This is an electronic facsimile of a document on file with the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection. [04/19/2006] Bruce M. Poole RE: SALEM—Bureau of Waste Prevention SP Engineering, Inc. A &H Auto Exchange, Inc. P.O. Box 848 15 Robinson Road Salem, MA 01970 IMF#383755 Response to Comments and Compliance Schedule (Best Management Plan) ACOP-NE-05-9015-2467 Dear Mr. Poole: The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection's Metropolitan Boston/Northeast Regional Office,Bureau of Waste Prevention("MassDEP")has received your letter(dated March 15,2006)regarding A&H Auto Exchange, Inc. ("A&H") at 15 Robinson Road in Salem, Massachusetts (the "Property"). Your letter provides a status report and compliance schedule in response to Administrative Consent Order with Penalty, ACOP-NE-05-9015-2467 ("the ACOP"), and MassDEP's comments dated December 23, 2005. The ACOP required, in part, the submittal of a Best Management Plan ("BMP") describing how A&H will operate in accordance with updated practices and applicable regulations. The original BMP was prepared by Alliance Environmental Group, Inc. and submitted to MassDEP on October 11, 2005. The original BMP, as amended by your letter and compliance schedule, appears to satisfy the BMP requirements set forth in the ACOP. As a result, it should be noted that Paragraph 24 of the ACOP also requires A&H to provide for periodic compliance inspections with written inspection reports submitted to MassDEP. The inspection reports shall describe in detail the condition and compliance status of each operational aspect of A&H's activities, and any deviation from compliance with the management practices set forth in the BMP or the applicable regulations. Please refer to the ACOP for specific details regarding compliance inspections and the submittal of inspection reports. As discussed with you during a telephone conversation on March 30, 2006, it is MassDEP's understanding that the initial compliance inspection occurred on March 29, 2006. The remaining quarterly inspections(one inspection every three months) will be conducted in accordance with the schedule set forth below, with a written inspection report submitted to MassDEP within fourteen (14)days of each inspection. This inrormalion is available in alternate format.Call Donald M.Gomes,ADA Coordinator at 617-556-1057.TDD Service-1.800-298-2207. DEP on the World Wide Web: http://www.mass.gov/dep `r1 Printed on Recycled Paper v SALEM—A&H Auto Exchange,Inc. Page 2 of 2 Response to Comments and Compliance Schedule(ACOP-NE-05-9015-2467) This is an electronic facsimile of a document on file with the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection. Inspection schedule: 1st quarterly inspection completed by July 1, 2006 2nd quarterly inspection completed by October 1, 2006 3rd quarterly inspection completed by January 1, 2007 4th quarterly inspection completed by April 1, 2007 The written annual report, as described in Paragraph 24 of the ACOP, shall be submitted to MassDEP no later than May 1,2007. In addition, you informed MassDEP that a wetlands delineation survey will be submitted by May 1, 2006, and a written environmental assessment of the Property will be submitted by July 1, 2006. Regarding the proposed development of a stormwater management system for this property, it should be noted that the site contains areas with higher potential pollutant loads. The potential concentrations and types of contaminants found where these land uses and activities occur necessitate that only certain stormwater management Best Management Practices (`BMPs") be recommended for treating runoff. Stormwater discharges from areas with higher potential pollutant loads require the use of specific BMPs, and restrictions apply to other BMPs. Please refer to MassDEP's Stormwater Policy and Technical Handbooks for further details and guidance, in particular Standard#5. The actions taken to relocate vehicles and dumpsters to a location no closer than 50 feet from the banks of the stream or any wetland resource area on the Property shall incorporate methods to protect the wetland resource areas, including, at a minimum, the placement of hay bale sedimentation/erosion controls and performing the work when the ground is dry, frozen or otherwise stable. Also, following the removal of these items, appropriate actions shall be taken to restore the area, smooth or eliminate ruts, and re- vegetate exposed soil, as necessary. All submissions made to MassDEP shall be certified by a responsible corporate officer of A&H in accordance with the applicable provisions of 310 CMR 19.000, including but not limited to the requirements of sections 310 CMR 19.011, 19.030, and 19.043. If you have any questions,please contact Mark Fairbrother at(978)694-3298. Sincerely, Sincerely, This final document ropy is bang provided to you electronicatly by the This bnal document copy is:being provided to you electronically by the Department of Environmental Protection.Asigned copy ofthis document Department of Environmental Probstiou.Asigned copy ofthis document ' Is on rile at the DEP office listed as the letterheadis on file at the DRP office listed on the letterhead Mark G. Fairbrother John A. Carrigan Environmental Analyst Section Chief Solid Waste Management Section Solid Waste Management Section JAC/MGF/mgf cc: Michael Ferris A&H Auto Exchange,Inc. 15 Robinson Road Salem,MA 01970 AHAuto_Salem_SPEng_4etter_200604 SALEM—A&H Auto Exchange,Inc. Page 3 of 3 l Response to Comments and Compliance Schedule(ACOP-NE-05-9015-2467) This is an electronic facsimile of a document on file with the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection. - James L.Rogal,Esq. Law Offices of Christopher M. Welch 32 Church Street Salem,MA 01970 Joanne Scott Salem Board of Health email: iscott@salem.com Frank Taormina Salem Department of Planning&Community Development email: ftaormina@salem.com David P.LaBrode DEP-NEROB WP Richard Tomczyk DEP-NERD/BRP AHAuto_Salem_SPEng_Letter_200604 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION METROPOLITAN BOSTON—NORTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE ONE WINTER STREET, BOSTON, MA 02108 617-292-5500 MITT ROMNEY STEPHEN R.PRITCHARD Governor Secretary KERRY HEALEYC y1J�(`1111PV NOV " � ROBERT W.GOLLEDGE,Jr. Lieutenant Governor Y 4 20� Commissioner CERTIFIED MAIL James L. Rogal,Esq. RE: SALEM—Solid Waste Management Law Offices of Christopher M. Welch A&H Auto Exchange, Inc. 32 Church Street 15 Robinson Road Salem, MA 01970 IMF# 383755 Administrative Consent Order with Penalty ACOP-NE-05-9015-2467 Dear Mr. Rogal: Enclosed herewith please find a fully executed copy of the final Administrative Consent Order with Penalty(ACOP)relative to the above-referenced case. Should you have any questions please contact me at(617) 654-6585. Sincerely, hn A. Car igan 6/Section Chief Solid Waste M Zge.e., ection JAC/mgf Enclosure: Administrative Consent Order with Penalty(ACOP-NE-05-9015-2467;effective date: 11/10/2005) Certified Mail No. 7004 3110 0001 6107 69R5 cc: Michael Ferris A&H Auto Exchange,Inc. 15 Robinson Road Salem,MA 01970 (without enclosure) This information is available to alternate format.Call Donald M.Gomes,ADA Coordinator at 617-556.1057.TDD Service-1-800498_220.7 I ® DEP on the Word Wide Web: hltp:th~.mass.gov/dep } }}ss 0�. yf L..a FE D ra3 Printed on Recycled Paper WV 2 ; 2005 DEPT.Or Pil.l,N!NG& �0�41t1011TY DEhL OPMENT A&H Auto Exchange,Inc. (Salem) Page 2 of 2 ACOP-NE-05-9015-2467 Joanne Scott Salem Board of Health email:is nut Salem com LFrank Taormina Salem Department of Planning&Community Development email: ftanrmins(j3salemcom jt^i 1 David P.LaBrode .1114 � � 'j DEP-NERO/B W P Heidi Zisch DEP-NERO/OGC DEP-NERD: MIS -3� Regional Enforcement File A&HAuto Salem exACOPCvrLtr 11142005 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Q� File No.: ACOP-NE-05-9015-2467 IMF No.: 383755 In-the-Matter o£ ) ADMINISTRATIVE CONSENT ORDER A& H Auto Exchange,Inc. ) WITH PENALTY AND Salem,Massachusetts ) NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE I. THE PARTIES 1. The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (the "Department") is a duly constituted agency of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts established pursuant to M.G.L. c. 21A, §7, with its principal and Metropolitan Boston/Northeast Regional offices located at One Winter Street,Boston,Massachusetts 02108. 2. A & H Auto Exchange, Inc. ("A&H") is a Massachusetts corporation duly organized under the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, with its principal offices located at 15 Robinson Road, Salem, Massachusetts 01970. Michael Ferris is the President of A&H. II. STATEMENT OF FACTS AND LAW 3. The Department is responsible for the implementation and enforcement of M.G.L. c. 111, §150A and M.G.L. c. 111, §150A1/2 and the regulations promulgated thereunder at 310 CMR 16.00 and 310 CMR 19.000; M.G.L. c. 111, §§142A-0 and the regulations promulgated thereunder at 310 CMR 6.00— 8.00; M.G.L. c. 21 C, §§4-6 and the regulations promulgated thereunder at 310_CMR 30.000; and M.G.L. c. 131, § 40, and the regulations promulgated thereunder at 310 CMR 10.00. The Department has authority under M.G.L. c. 21A, §16 and the regulations promulgated thereunder at 310 CMR 5.00 to assess civil administrative penalties to persons in noncompliance with its regulations. 4. The Department's authority to issue this Consent Order is conferred by M.G.L. c. 111, §150A and M.G.L. c. 111, §150A1/2 and the regulations promulgated thereunder at 310 CMR 16.00 and 310 CMR 19.000; M.G.L. c. 111, §§142A-0 and the regulations AP9015-05 ver. 10/06/2005 A &H Auto Exchange,Inc. I Page 2 of 17 11 SALEM ACOP-NE-05-9015-2467 promulgated thereunder at 310 CMR 6.00— 8.00; M.G.L. c. 21 C, §§4-6 and the regulations promulgated thereunder at 310 CMR 30.000; and M.G.L. c. 131, § 40, and the regulations promulgated thereunder at 310 CMR 10.00. 5. A&H owns and operates an automobile salvage operation on approximately 9.7 acres of land located off of 15 Robinson Road in Salem, Massachusetts owned by Mountain Realty Trust (the "Property"). A&H is using portions of the Property for the storage, handling, processing and transfer of solid waste. In addition, A&H is a generator of waste oil and other hazardous waste. 6. The Property has not been site assigned for such solid waste activities in accordance with 310 CMR 16.00, the Site Assignment Regulations for Solid Waste Facilities. The Department has issued no permits, plans or approvals for a solid waste management facility at the Property pursuant to 310 CMR 19.000,the Solid Waste Management Regulations. 7. On October 23, 2003, Department personnel inspected the Property and observed the following. a) The accumulation and storage on the ground of construction and demolition waste ("C&D") from off--site sources. b) The storage of C&D from off-site sources in roll-off containers pending transfer for off-site disposal. c) The speculative accumulation of used tires in violation of 310 CMR 7.07(4). d) The discharge of a mixture of used gasoline/water to the ground in violation of M.G.L. c. 21 C and 310 CMR 30.801. e) The accumulation of hazardous waste and waste oil without registering with the Department as a Very Small Quantity Generator (VSQG) of hazardous waste or a Small Quantity Generator (SQG) of waste oil in violation of M.G.L. c. 21 C and 310 CMR 30.801, and in violation of 310 CMR 30.253(10)(a) [which refers to 310 CMR 30.353(5)]. f) The signed Copies (Copy 3 of eight part and/or Copy 1 of four part) of hazardous waste manifests were not available for review.in violation of 310 CMR 30.253(10)(b) [which refers to 310 CMR 30.331(1)]. g) Copies 6 and 7 of several hazardous waste manifests had not been mailed to the Department, and to the destination state(s) identified on the hazardous waste manifest(s) in violation of 310 CMR 30.253(1.0)(b) [which refers to 310 CMR 30.314(1)(c)1 and (1)(c)2]. h) Two above ground tanks (one 300-gallon tank and one 500-gallon tank) used to accumulate waste oil were not marked with the required information in violation of 310 AP9015-05 ver. 10/06/2005 A &H Auto Exchange,Inc. Page 3 of 17 SALEM ACOP-NE-05-9015-2467 CMR 30.253(6)(b) [which refers to 310 CMR 30.351(8)(a), which refers to 310 CMR 30.341(2)]. i) The waste oil accumulation area was not marked and clearly distinguishable from generation area(s) and other waste management areas in violation of 310 CMR 30.253(6)(b) [which refers to 310 CMR 30.351(8)(a), which refers to 310 CMR 30.341(5)]. j) An up-to-date written list containing the required emergency information was not posted next to every telephone at the site of generation in violation of 310 CMR 30.253(7)(b) [which refers to 310 CMR 30.351(9)(c)(6)(a)through (d)]. k) A sign with the words "Waste Oil' was not posted in the waste oil accumulation area in violation of 310 CMR 30.253(6)(b)(1). 1) Both the 300 and 500-gallon above ground tanks of waste oil were located on a surface that is not impervious, in violation of 310 CMR 30.253(6)(b)2.a. [which refers to 310 CMR 30.343(1)(d)2.a]. m) Both the 300 and 500-gallon above ground tanks of waste oil were open, in violation of 310 CMR 30.253(6)(b)2.b. [which refers to 310 CMR 30.343(1)(e), which refers to 310 CMR 30.695(5)]. 8. On June 25„ 2004, Department personnel inspected the Property for the purpose of assessing A&H's compliance with the requirements of 310 CMR 16.00 and 310 CMR 19.000 with regards to the management of solid waste at the Property and observed the following. a) The accumulation and storage on the ground of C&D from off-site sources. b) The storage of C&D from off-site sources in roll-off containers pending transfer for off-site disposal. c) The speculative accumulation of used tires. 9. On August 23, 2004, A&H submitted appropriate documentation to the Department registering the facility as a small quantity generator of waste oil. 10. On December 14, 2004, Department personnel observed the storage of vehicles and dumpsters at the Property adjacent to the banks of a stream and within the one hundred (100)-foot buffer zone of a wetland resource area. 11. The management of solid waste at the Property is regulated under 310 CMR 16.00, "The Site Assignment Regulations for Solid Waste Facilities" and 310 CMR 19.000, "The Solid Waste Management Regulations". AP9015-05 ver. 10/06/2005 A& H Auto Exchange, Inc. Page 4 of 17 SALEM ACOP-NE-05-9015-2467 ' 12. The Department has determined based on the foregoing that A&H has violated the following requirements: a) 310 CMR 19.020 —Permit Requirements for Construction and Operation of Solid Management Facilities,which reads in part: "Except as allowed under 310 CMR 19.021, no person shall construct, operate or maintain a facility to store, process, transfer, treat, or dispose of solid waste except in accordance with: (1) a valid site assignment; (2) a solid waste management facility permit (hereafter permit), issued in accordance with 310 CMR 19.000; (3) an authorization to construct the facility issued by the Department in accordance with 310 CMR 19.041; and (4) an authorization to operate the facility issued by the Department in accordance with 31 CMR 19.042." b) 310 CMR 16.06—Prohibitions, which reads in part: "No place in any city or town shall be maintained as a site for a facility unless such place has been assigned by the board of health or the Department, whichever is applicable, pursuant to M.G.L. c. 111, sect. 150A. Any disposal of solid waste at any location not so assigned shall constitute a violation of 310 CMR 16.00." C) 310 CMR 19.014 — Prohibition on open dumps and dumpingrgrounds, which reads in part: "No person shall establish, construct, operate, or maintain a dumping ground, or operate or maintain a landfill in such a manner as to constitute an open dump. For the purpose of 310 CMR 19.014, the phrase "establish, construct, operate, or maintain" shall include without limitation, disposing or contracting for the disposal of refuse in a dumping ground or open dump.,, d) 310 CMR 19.015—Compliance,which reads in part: "No person shall construct, modify, operate or maintain a facility except in compliance with a site assignment, permit or plan approved by the board of health or the Department, as applicable, and any authorizations issued by the Department and all conditions included in a permit, approval or authorization for said facility." e) 310 CMR 19.041 —Authorization to Construct, which reads in part: "(1) General. The following shall not be constructed except in accordance with a valid authorization to construct issued by the Department in writing: (a) a facility for which a permit has been issued; (b) modifications to a facility for which a permit modification has been issued; or AP9015-05 ver. 10/06/2005 A & H Auto Exchange, Inc. Page 5 of 17 SALEM ACOP-NE-05-9015-2467 (c) a new phase in the case of a landfill being developed in phases." f) 310 CMR 19.042—Authorization to Operate,which reads in part: "(1) General. No person shall operate a facility, or if a new or existing facility is developed in phases, operate in any new phase of a facility without a valid authorization to operate issued by the Department in writing." g) 310 CMR 7.07(4), which reads in part: "Except as may be incidental to compliance with the provisions contained in 310 CMR 7.07(2) and 310 CMR 7.07(3) no person shall stack, place, or store combustible material in such a manner as to cause or allow presumption by the Department that such material may be subject to reduction by open burning." h) M.G.L., Chapter 21C, Massachusetts Hazardous Waste Management Act, Section 5, which reads in part: `No person shall collect, transport, store, dispose of, treat, use or transport [sic] hazardous waste in a manner which could endanger human health, safety or welfare, or the environment, or in a manner inconsistent with any provision of this chapter, or of any regulation standard, license, or order issued pursuant to this chapter. No person shall collect, transport, store, treat, use or dispose of hazardous waste unless that person is in possession of a valid license issued pursuant to this chapter and, when in possession of such waste shall have a valid manifest." i) 310 CMR 30.253(6)(b)(1), which reads in part: "...all areas where waste oil and/or used oil fuel is accumulated or stored, except for satellite accumulation areas, shall have posted at all times a sign with the words "WASTE OIL" in capital letters at least one inch high. Each sign shall meet the guidelines set forth in the National Fire Protection Association's Code No. 704." j) 310 CMR 30.253(6)(b) [which refers to 310 CMR 30.351(8)(a) and 310 CMR 30.341(2)], which reads in part: "Each tank or container in which hazardous waste is being accumulated shall be clearly marked and labeled throughout the period of accumulation. Marks and labels shall be clearly visible for inspection. For aboveground tanks and containers, marks and labels shall be made on the side of each tank or container...Each tank or container shall be marked and labeled with the following: (a) The words "Hazardous Waste"; (b) The hazardous waste(s)identified in words (e.g., acetone,toluene); (c) The type of hazard(s) associated with the wastes(s) indicated in words (e.g., ignitable,toxic, dangerous when wet); and AP9015-05 ver. 10/06/2005 A &H Auto Exchange, Inc. Page 6 of 17 SALEM ACOP-NE-05-9015-2467 (d) The date upon which each period of accumulation begins. k) 310 CMR 30.253(6)(b) [which refers to 310 CMR 30.351(8)(a) and 310 CMR 30.341(5)], which reads in part: "All area(s) where wastes are accumulated for the purposes of complying with 310 CMR 30.000 generally shall be clearly marked (e.g., by a clearly visible line or piece of tape on the floor, or by a gate or fence, or by a sign at the boundary of a clearly distinguishable area) so that they are clearly distinguishable at all times from all specific points of generation where wastes are initially accumulated solely for the purposes of 310 CMR 30.340(6), and from all areas at the site of generation where wastes are not accumulated." 1) 310 CMR 30.253(6)(b)2.a [which refers to 310 CMR 30.343(1)(d)2.a], which reads in part: "All above-ground tanks shall have a containment system which is free of cracks and gaps and is sufficiently impervious to contain leaks, spills, and accumulated precipitation until the collected material is detected and removed." m) 310 CMR 30.253(7)(b) [which refers to 310 CMR 30.351(9)(c)(6)(a)through (d)], which reads in part: "A generator shall have...on the premises...an up-to date written list containing the following information, a copy of which shall be prominently posted next to every telephone at the site of generation: a. The name(s) and telephone number(s)of the emergency coordinator(s). b. The location(s) of the fire extinguisher(s) and spill control materials, and, if present,the fire alarms. c. The telephone number of the fire department, and, if there is a direct alarm system, instructions on how to activate it. d. Evacuation routes,where applicable." n) 310 CMR 30.253(6)(b)2.b. [which refers to 310 CMR30.343(1)(e) and 310 CMR 30.695(5)],which reads in part: " A tank holding hazardous waste shall always be closed during storage, except when waste is being added or removed." o) 310 CMR 30.253(6)(c) [which refers to 310 CMR 30.353(5)], which reads in part: "A very small quantity generator shall register with the Department by notifying the Department in writing of its activity involving hazardous waste or regulated recyclable material. If the Department prescribe a form for such registration, the generator shall use such form when submitting such re strahon. Such a registration shall be signed and g � g g submitted in compliance with 310 CMR 30.006 and 30.009. The generator shall follow such procedures as may be required, requested or authorized by the Department to obtain AP9015-05 ver. 10/06/2005 l A&H Auto Exchange, Inc. Page 7 of 17 SALEM ACOP-NE-05-9015-2467 and keep its status as a very small quantity generator. If the very small quantity generator intends to transfer custody or possession of the hazardous waste or regulated recyclable material to another person or persons, the registration shall set forth the name, address, and EPA identification number, if applicable, of each such person. If the very small quantity generator intends to itself treat or recycle the hazardous waste or regulated recyclable material, the registration shall set forth the process by which the hazardous waste or regulated recyclable material shall be treated or recycled. If the site has an EPA identification number or a Massachusetts identification number, that number shall be included in the registration. An identification number for the site is required if the very small quantity generator is using a manifest." p) 310 CMR 30.253(10)(b) [which refers to 310 CMR 30.331(1)], which reads in part: "Retention of manifest documents. Whenever required or whenever used even if not required,the following manifests shall be kept by the generator for three years from the date the waste was accepted by the initial transporter: 1. Copy 8 of the eight part form referenced in 310 CMR 30.312(1); however once a fully executed copy 3 is received by the generator, then this copy 3 shall be kept on file instead of or in addition to the partially executed copy 8. 2. Copy 4 of the four part form referenced in 310 CMR 30.312(3) or (4); however, once a fully executed copy 1 is received by the generator, then this copy 1 shall be kept on file instead of or in addition to the partially executed copy 4." q) 310 CMR 30.253(10)(b) [which refers to 310 CMR 30.314(1)(c)l and (1)(c)2], which reads in part: "The generator shall do the following: (c)Retain three copies and distribute as follows: 1. one copy shall be sent to the Department within ten days of the initiation of the shipment; 2. another copy shall be sent to the appropriate agency of the destination state, if the facility is located outside of Massachusetts, within ten days of the initiation of the shipment." r) 310 CMR 30.801,which reads in part: "No person shall transport, use, collect, store, treat, or dispose of hazardous waste or construct, operate or maintain any facility for,the use, storage, treatment, or disposal of hazardous waste, unless said person, has applied for and obtained, and has in effect, a valid license issued by the Department pursuant to M.G.L. c. 21C and 310 CMR 30.000." AP9015-05 ver. 10/06/2005 A &H Auto Exchange,Inc. Page 8 of 17' SALEM ACOP-NE-05-9015-2467 ' S) The Wetlands Protection Act, M.G.L. c. 131, § 40, which reads in part: "No person shall remove, fill, dredge or alter any riverfront area, freshwater wetland, coastal wetland, ...marsh, meadow, or swamp bordering on the ocean or any...creek, river, stream, pond, or lake, or any land under said waters or any land subject to tidal action, coastal storm flowage, or flooding...without filing written notice of his intention to so remove, fill, dredge or alter including such plans as may be necessary to describe such proposed activity and its effect on the environment and without receiving and complying with an order of conditions and provided all appeal periods have elapsed." i t) The Wetlands Protection Act, M.G.L. c. 131, § 40, which reads in part: "No person shall remove, fill, dredge or alter any area subject to protection under this section without the required authorization, or cause, suffer or allow such activity, or leave in place unauthorized fill, or otherwise fail to restore illegally altered land to its original condition, or fail to comply with an enforcement order issued pursuant to this section. Each day such violation continues shall constitute a separate offense." u) The Wetlands Regulations, 310 CMR 10.02(2)(a) and 310 CMR 10.05(4)(a), which reads in part: "Any person who proposes to do work that will alter any area subject to protection under the Wetlands Protection Act is required to file a Notice of Intent." V) The Wetlands Regulations, 310 CMR 10.02(2)(b), "Activities Within the Buffer Zone,"which reads in part: "Any activity other than minor activities identified in 310 10.58(6)(b) proposed or undertaken within 100 feet of an area specified in 310 CMR 10.02(1)(a) (hereinafter called the Buffer Zone) which, in the judgment of the issuing authority, will alter an Area Subject to Protection Under M.G.L. c. 131 § 40 is subject to regulation under M.G.L. c. 131, § 40 and requires the filing of a Notice of Intent." w) The Wetlands Regulations, 310 CMR 10.05(3)(a)(2), which reads in part: "Any person who proposes to perform work within the Buffer Zone shall submit to the conservation commission either a Notice of Intent for such work or a Request for Determination of Applicability." AP9015-05 ver. 10/06/2005 A &H Auto Exchange, Inc. Page 9 of 17 SALEM ACOP-NE-05-9015-2467 III. DISPOSITION 13. The Department and A&H have agreed to enter into this Consent Order because they agree that it is in their own interests, and in the public interest, to proceed promptly with the actions called for herein rather than expend additional time and resources litigating the allegations set forth above. This Consent Order shall not constitute, be construed as, or operate as an admission by A&H of any fact or violation of any law or regulation. However, A&H agrees not to contest the facts and violations set forth herein for purposes of the issuance and enforcement of this Consent Order. 14. A&H hereby waives its right to an adjudicatory hearing before the Department on, and judicial review of, the issuance and terms of this Consent Order and to notice of any such rights of review. 15. The Department hereby determines, and A&H hereby agrees, that the deadlines set forth in this Consent Order constitute reasonable times to perform the actions agreed to in this Consent Order and to come into compliance with the provisions cited in Part II above. 16. For purposes of M.G.L. c. 21A, §16, and 310 CMR 5.00,this Consent Order shall serve as a Notice of Noncompliance for A&H's noncompliance with the requirements cited in Part II above. Future violations of those requirements or of thio Consent Order may result, without limitation, in the assessment of additional civil administrative penalties for each day, or portion thereof, each such violation occurs or continues. 17. This Consent Order shall be binding on A&H and on its officers, employees, agents, successors and assignees. A&H shall not violate this Consent Order and shall not allow or suffer its officers, employees, agents, successors, consultants, assignees or contractors to violate this Consent Order. Violation of this Consent Order by any of the foregoing shall constitute a violation of this Consent Order by A&H. A&H shall provide a copy of this Consent Order to each successor or assignee concurrent with establishing any succession or assignment. 18. Nothing in this Consent Order shall be construed or operate as barring, diminishing, adjudicating or in any way affecting (i) any legal or equitable right of the Department to issue any additional Order or to seek any other relief with respect to the subject matter covered by this Consent Order; (ii) any legal or equitable right of the Department to pursue any other claim, action, suit, cause of action, or demand which the Department may have with respect to the subject matter covered by this Consent Order, including, without limitation, any action to enforce this Consent Order in an administrative or judicial proceeding; or(iii) any legal or equitable right of the Department with respect to any subject matter not covered by this Consent Order. AP9015-05 ver. 10/06/2005 A& H Auto Exchange,Inc. Page 10 of 17' SALEM ACOP-NE-05-9015-2467 ' IV. ORDER For the reasons set forth above,the Department hereby issues, and A&H hereby consents to, the following Order. 19. A&H shall cease all solid waste management activities at the Property that are not in compliance with the requirements of 310 CMR 16.00, 310 CMR 19.000, and 310 CMR 7.07(4). These activities include, but are not necessarily limited to: the speculative accumulation of tires, and the disposal, handling, storage, processing, and/or transfer of construction and demolition debris generated from locations other than the Property. 20. A&H shall manage all hazardous waste, including waste oil, at the Property in accordance with the requirements of 310 CMR 30.000, The Massachusetts Hazardous Waste Regulations. Within thirty (30) days of the effective date of this Consent Order, A&H shall: a) label each tank and container in which waste oil or other hazardous wastes are being accumulated in accordance with 310 CMR 30.341(2); b) post a sign with the words WASTE OIL in the area(s) where waste oil is being accumulated as required by 310 CMR 30.253(6)(b)(1); c) maintain and manage all tanks and containers in which waste oil or other hazardous wastes are being accumulated in accordance with the requirements of 310 CMR 30.000, including but not limited to, closing all such containers except when waste is being added or removed, as required by 310 CMR 30.695(5); d) make such modifications as are necessary in areas where waste oil is being accumulated to comply with the provisions of 310 CMR 30.253(6)(b); e) mark all areas where hazardous wastes are accumulated so such areas are clearly distinguishable from areas where waste are initially accumulated for purposes of 310 CMR 30.341(5),and from all areas where wastes are not accumulated; f) retain, as applicable, Copy, 3 of all hazardous waste manifests for hazardous waste shipped from the Property in accordance with 310 CMR 30.331(1); g) provide a copy of the hazardous waste manifest to the Department, within ten days of the date the shipment begins, as required by 310 CMR 30.314(1)(c)1; h) provide a copy of the-hazardous waste manifest to the appropriate agency of the State in which the receiving facility for the waste is located, within ten days of the date any hazardous waste shipment begins, as required by 310 CMR 30.314(1)(c)2; i) post near the telephone(s) at the Property and in the waste oil management area, the emergency information required by 310 CMR 30.351(9)(c)6. a. through d.; and AP9015-05 ver. 10/06/2005 I A &H Auto Exchange, Inc. Page I I of 17 SALEM ACOP-NE-05-9015-2467 j) manage the wastewater separated from gasoline as a hazardous waste in accordance with M.G.L., Chapter 21C, Massachusetts Hazardous Waste Management Act, Section 5 and 310 CMR 30.801. 21. A&H shall,within sixty(60) days of the effective date of this Consent Order: a) Remove all accumulated construction and demolition waste from the Property, and properly dispose of said waste at an approved solid waste management facility and in accordance with the requirements of 310 CMR 16.00 and 310 CMR 19.000; and b) Submit to the Department, for the Department's review, a schedule and plan for removing the accumulated tires from the Property and detailing the measures A&H will take to prevent the future speculative accumulation of tires ("Tire Removal Plan and Schedule"). 22. Within ninety (90) days of the effective date of this Consent Order, A&H shall submit to the Department a written report documenting an environmental assessment of the Property, which shall be conducted as set forth in this paragraph. The report shall be signed and certified by a responsible corporate officer of A&H, in accordance with the requirements of 310 CMR 19.011. A&H shall complete an environmental assessment to determine whether any releases of oil and/or hazardous materials to the environment have occurred at the Property. Such assessment shall include, without limitation, an investigation of the soils associated with the hazardous waste/waste oil storage area(s), the motor vehicle crushing/dismantling area(s), and other likely areas of contamination at the Property. If the results. of the assessment trigger a notification requirement under the Massachusetts Contingency Plan 310 CMR 40.0000 (the "MCP"), A&H shall properly notify the Department and conduct the necessary actions in accordance with the MCP, and A&H shall be subject to the submittal requirements, approvals and fees specified in the MCP. All necessary actions and submittals shall be performed according to the timelines specified in 310 CMR 40.0000. If the assessment results indicate contamination but do not trigger a notification requirement under the MCP, A&H shall conduct the necessary actions in accordance with the requirements of 310 CMR 40.0370. 23. Within ninety(90) days of the effective date of this Consent Order, A&H shall submit to the Department an Auto Recycling and Junkyard Best Management Plan (the "BMP"), specific to A&H's activities at the Property as set forth below, and signed and certified by a responsible corporate officer of A&H, in accordance with the requirements of 310 CMR 19.011. The BMP shall describe how A&H will manage all motor vehicle fluids, hazardous materials/waste, and solid waste in accordance with updated practices and all applicable state and federal regulations. As applicable to A&H, the BMP shall describe, without limitation: i. the steps A&H has already taken to comply with the provisions of 310 CMR 16.00, 310 CMR 19.000, and 310 CMR 30.000 relative to the management AP9015-05 ver. 10/06/2005 t A& H Auto Exchange, Inc. Page 12 of 17'' SALEM ACOP-NE-05-9015-2467 ' of solid waste and hazardous waste at the Property and with the requirements of this Consent Order; ii. the proper management of all fluids removed from junk/salvage motor vehicles; iii. the removal and proper management of recyclable materials, and hazardous components and materials from such vehicles, including, but not limited to, mercury switches, lead components and lead-acid batteries, tires, refrigerants, and air bags; iv. the location of on-site crushers and/or balers, whether contracted or owned, on an impermeable and bermed area; Ov the relocation of the vehicles and dumpsters adjacent to the banks of the stream to a location no closer than 50 feet from the banks of the stream or any wetland resource area on the property and ensure that future activities adjacent to the stream or other resource areas, including storage of equipment, vehicles or dumpsters are in compliance with the Wetland Protection Act,M.G.L. Chapter 131 Section 40 and the Wetland Regulations, 310 CMR 10.00; 1(ivi\ the incorporation of stormwater management practices; vii. training of employees in the contents of the BMP, safety and emergency procedures, and applicable regulatory requirements;and viii. all other procedures for the proper and safe operation of such activities. 24. A&H shall provide for periodic compliance inspections and evaluations of A&H's activities (the "inspections"). The inspections shall be conducted, as set forth below, by a licensed professional experienced in solid and hazardous waste management (the "inspector"). Such qualified individuals may include Licensed Site Professionals ("LSPs") and Massachusetts Registered Professional Engineers. a) Within thirty (30) days of the Department's receipt of the BMP described in paragraph 23 above, the initial inspection shall be conducted. Thereafter, quarterly inspections (one inspection every three months)shall be conducted for a period of one year. b) Within fourteen (14) days of each inspection, A&H shall submit to the Department a written inspection report signed and certified by the inspector and a responsible corporate officer of A&H in accordance with 310 CMR 19.011 that, to the best of his/her knowledge, all information is accurate and complete. The inspection report shall describe in detail the condition and compliance status of each operational aspect of A&H's activities, and any deviation from compliance with the management practices set forth in the BMP or the applicable regulations. In the event a condition p pp gu on of noncompliance is identified, the report shall clearly describe: i. the issue of noncompliance; ii. any actions already taken to correct such noncompliance; iii. any proposed actions to appropriately correct such noncompliance; iv. a schedule for implementing the corrective action(s); and v. a schedule to correct any other issues identified by the inspector. AP9015-05 ver. 10/06/2005 .'t A& H Auto Exchange, Inc. Page 13 of 17 SALEM ACOP-NE-05-9015-2467 c) Within thirty (30) days of the last quarterly inspection described in.paragraph 24.a. above, A&H shall submit to the Department a written annual report signed and certified by the inspector and a responsible corporate officer of A&H in accordance with 310 CMR 19.011 that, to the best of his/her knowledge, all information is accurate and complete. The annual report shall include a certification that all actions required by this Consent Order have been completed, and shall document, without limitation: i. the results of the inspections required by paragraph 24.a of this Consent Order; ii. A&H's compliance status regarding the requirements of this Consent Order and the activities described in the BMP; and iii. any additional recommendations of the inspector to maintain compliance with the applicable regulations. 25. The actions required by this Consent Order shall be performed in accordance with M.G.L. c. 111, §150A and M.G.L. c. 111, §150A1/2 and the regulations promulgated thereunder at 310 CMR 16.00 and 310 CMR 19.000; M.G.L. c. 111, §§142A-0 and the regulations promulgated thereunder at 310 CMR 6.00 — 8.00; M.G.L. c. 21C, §§4-6 and the regulations promulgated thereunder at 310 CMR 30.000; and M.G.L. c. 131, § 40, and the regulations promulgated thereunder at 310 CMR 10.00 and all other applicable federal, state and local laws, regulations and approvals. Any noncompliance with such laws, regulations or approvals shall constitute a violation of this Consent Order. 26. A&H will have fulfilled the requirements set forth in this Consent Order upon A&H's completion of all the actions, submittals and payments required in this Consent Order, and upon the issuance by the Department of a return-to-compliance letter regarding the violations cited in Part II of this Consent Order. V. PENALTIES 27. For the violations described in Part II above, the Department assesses a civil administrative penalty of Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000),payable as set forth below: a) Within thirty (30) days of the effective date of this Consent Order, A&H shall pay to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts the sum of Two Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($2,500) as a civil administrative penalty for the violations listed in Part II above. Payment of such penalty shall be made in the manner set forth in paragraph 29 below. b) Within sixty (60) days of the effective date of this Consent Order, A&H shall pay to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts the sum of Two Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($2,500) as a civil administrative penalty for the violations listed in Part II above. Payment of such penalty shall be made in the manner set forth in paragraph 29 below. AP9015-05 ver. 10/06/2005 A&H Auto Exchange, Inc. Page 14 of 1 T SALEM ACOP-NE-05-9015-2467 c) If A&H violates any provision of this Consent Order, or further violates any of the requirements cited in Part II above within one year of the effective date of this Consent Order, A&H shall pay to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts the remaining amount of Twenty Thousand Dollars ($20,000). Payment of such penalty shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of written demand for payment from the Department, and shall be made in the manner set forth in paragraph 29 below. 28. In addition to the penalty in paragraph 27 above, if A&H violates this Consent Order, A&H shall pay to the Commonwealth a stipulated civil administrative penalty in accordance with the following schedule. For each day, or portion thereof, each violation continues, A&H shall pay stipulated civil administrative penalties as follows: Period of Violation Penalty per day Ist through 15th day $1,000 per day 16th through 30th day $2,000 per day 31 st day and thereafter $4,000 per day Stipulated civil administrative penalties shall begin to accrue on the day a violation occurs and shall continue to accrue until the day A&H corrects the violation or completes performance whichever is applicable. Even if violations are simultaneous, separate penalties shall accrue for separate violations of this Consent Order. Stipulated civil administrative penalties shall accrue regardless of whether the Department has notified A&H of a violation or act of noncompliance. The payment of stipulated civil administrative penalties shall not alter in any way A&H's obligation to complete performance as required by this Consent Order. All stipulated civil administrative penalties accruing under this Consent Order shall be paid within thirty (30) days of the date the Department sends a written demand therefore. If a court judgment is necessary to execute a claim for such stipulated penalties under this paragraph, A&H agrees to assent to the entry of such judgment. The stipulated civil administrative penalties set forth herein shall not preclude the Department from electing to pursue alternative remedies or alternative civil or criminal penalties which may be available by reason of A&H's failure to comply with the requirements of this Consent Order. In the event the Department collects alternative civil administrative penalties, A&H shall not be required to pay such stipulated penalties pursuant to this Consent Order. 29. A&H shall pay all civil administrative penalties due under this Consent Order by certified check, cashier's check or money order payable to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. A&H shall clearly print the name "A & H Auto Exchange, Inc.", file number "ACOP-NE- 05-9015-2467" and A&H's Federal Employer Identification Number on the face of the payment, and shall mail it to: AP9015-05 ver. 10/06/2005 % A &H Auto Exchange, Inc. Page 15 of 17 SALEM ACOP-NE-05-9015-2467 Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Commonwealth Master Lockbox P.O. Box 3982 Boston, Massachusetts 02241- 3982 A&H shall deliver a copy of the payment to: Heidi O'Brien,Deputy Regional Director Bureau of Waste Prevention Department of Environmental Protection Northeast Regional Office One Winter Street—3rd Floor Boston, Massachusetts 02108 In the event A&H fails to pay in full any civil administrative penalty on or before the date due under this Consent Order, and in the manner and form required by this Consent Order, A&H shall pay to the Commonwealth three (3) times the amount of the civil administrative penalty, together with costs, plus interest on the. balance due from the time the civil administrative penalty became due and attorneys' fees, including all costs and attorneys' fees incurred in the collection thereof. The rate of interest shall be the rate set forth in M.G.L. c. 231, §6C. VI. ACCESS 30. A&H agrees to provide the Department, and the Department's employees, representatives and contractors, access at all reasonable times to the Property for purposes of conducting any activity related to its oversight of this Consent Order. Notwithstanding any provisions of this Consent Order, the Department retains all of its access authorities and rights under applicable state and federal law. VII. COMPLIANCE WITH OTHER LAWS AND REGULATIONS 31. This Consent Order shall not be construed as, or operate as, relieving A&H or any other person of the necessity of complying with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations. VIII. MODIFICATIONS 32. This Consent Order may be modified only by written agreement of the parties hereto. AP9015-05 ver. 10/06/2005 A& H Auto Exchange,Inc. Page 16 of 17' ' SALEM ACOP-NE-05-9015-2467 ' IX. SUBMISSIONS 33. Submissions required by this Consent Order shall be considered delivered upon receipt by the Department. All submissions required by this Consent Order,other than those made pursuant to paragraph 29 above, shall be submitted to: Heidi O'Brien,Deputy Regional Director Bureau of Waste Prevention Department of Environmental Protection Northeast Regional Office One Winter Street—3`d Floor Boston, MA 02108 34. All submissions made to the Department by A&H under this Consent Order shall be certified by a responsible corporate ,officer of A&H in accordance with the applicable provisions of 310 CMR 19.000, including but not limited to the requirements of sections 310 CMR 19.011, 19.031(11), and 19.043. 35. Within thirty (30) days of the receipt of the Department's comments, if any, regarding any submittal required pursuant to Part IV of this Consent Order, A&H shall submit to the Department a revised document that corrects any deficiencies reasonably identified by the Department in the draft document and makes any changes that the Department reasonably requires. Failure to submit a revised document within thirty (30) days shall constitute a violation of this Consent Order. X. SEVERABILITY 36. The provisions of this Consent Order are severable and if any provision of this Consent Order or the application thereof is held invalid or unenforceable, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect the validity of any other provision of this Consent Order, or the application of such other provisions, which shall be given full effect without the invalid or unenforceable provision or application provided, however, that the Department may, in its sole discretion, elect to void the entire Consent Order in the event of any such invalidity or unenforceability. XI. RATIFICATION 37. This Consent Order shall become effective on the date of the last signature set forth below. 38. Each undersigned representative hereby certifies that he/she is fully authorized to enter into the terms and conditions of this Consent Order and to legally bind the party on whose behalf such representative is signing to this Consent Order. AP9015-05 ver. 10/06/2005 J A&H Auto Exchange, Inc. Page 17 of 17 SALEM ACOP-NE-05-9015-2467 A& H AUTO EXCHANGE,INC. By: r ) Michael Ferris, Presiden A & H Auto Exchange, Inc. 15 Robinson Road Salem, MA 01970 Federal Employer Identification No. O 51'33�7 19.9 j Date: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION By: Richard J. Chalpin,Regional Director Metropolitan Boston/Northeast Regional Office One Winter Street—5a'Floor Boston,Massachusetts 02108 Telephone (617) 654-6500 Date: 1 AP9015-05 ver. 10/06/2005 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by DEP: Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands 64-426 DEP File Number / WPA Form 3 - Notice of Intent Revised 1 /25/20 7 Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 Document Transaction NumberSalem Cityrrown Important: When filling out A. General Information forms on the computer,use 1. Project Location (Note: electronic filers will click on button for GIS locator): only the tab key to move your 15 Robinson Road Salem 01970 cursor-do not use the return a.Street Address b.City/rown c.Zip Code key. Latitude I Latitude and Longitude: 42.491969 -70.920072 _ILS d.Latitude e.Longitude 6 Lot 13 f.Assessors Map/Plat Number g.Parcel/Lot Number 2. Applicant: Mike Ferris A&H Auto Exchange a.First Name b.Last Name c.Company Note: 15 Robinson Road Before d.Mailing Address completing this Salem MA 01970 form consult your local e.Cityrrown f.State g.Zip Code Conservation 978-815-0109 Commission h.Phone Number i.Fax Number j.Email address regarding any municipal bylaw 3. Property owner(if different from applicant): ❑ Check if more than one owner or ordinance. 15 Robinson Road Realty Trust a.First Name b.Last Name C.Company 15 Robinson Road d.Mailing Address Salem MA 01970 e.Cityrrown f.State g.Zip Code 978-815-0109 h.Phone Number i.Fax Number j.Email address 4. Representative (if any): SP Engineering Inc. a.Firth Bruce Poole b.Contact Person First Name c.Contact Person Last Name P.O. Box 848 d.Mailing Address Salem MA 01970 e.City7rown I.State g.Zip Code 978-745-4569 978-745-4881 h.Phone Number i.Fax Number j.Email address 5. Total WPA Fee Paid (from NOI Wetland Fee Transmittal Form): $1550.00 $762.50 $787.50 a.Total Fee Paid b.State Fee Paid c.City/rown Fee Paid 6. General Project Description: Construction of impervious surface(liner)for vehicle work area and associated Stormwater Management Plan per DEP administrative order. wpaform3.doc•rev.4/12106 Page 1 of 7 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by DER Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands 64-425 DEP File,N'umber WPA Form 3 — Notice of Intent Revised 1 425izoo7 DocumentTransaction Number'- Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 Salemf v . City/Town A. General Information (continued) 7. Project Type Checklist: a_ ❑ Single Family Home b. ❑ Residential Subdivision C. ❑ Limited Project Driveway Crossing d. ® Commercial/Industrial e. ❑ Dock/Pier f. ❑ Utilities g. ❑ Coastal Engineering Structure h. ❑ Agriculture—cranberries, forestry i. ❑ Transportation j. ❑ Other 8. Property recorded at the Registry of Deeds for. Southern Essex 105 a.County b.Page Number 7428 Plan Book 41, Plan 15 c.Book - - d.Certificate#(if registered land) 9. Has work been performed on the property under an Order of Resource Area Delineation involving Simplified Review within 3 years of the date of this application? a. ❑Yes b. ® No If yes, no Notice of Intent or Request for Determination of Applicability may be filed for work within the 50-foot-wide area in the Buffer Zone along the resource area during the three-year term of an Order of Resource Area Delineation, or any Extended Order, or until the applicant receives a Certificate of Compliance, whichever is later. 10. Buffer Zone Only- Is the project located only in the Buffer Zone of a bordering vegetated wetland, inland bank, or coastal resource area? a. ®Yes-answer 11 below, then skip to Section C. b.�]No-skip to Section B. 11. Buffer Zone Setback—For projects that involve work only in the buffer zone, select the applicable adjacent resource area(check one): a. ❑ BVW b. ® inland bank _c. ❑coastal resource area The distance between the closest project disturbance and the associated resource area is: .1.0'to detention basin wpafonn3.doc•rev.4/12/06 Page 2 of 7 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by DEP Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands 64-426 -DEP File Number WPA Form 3 — Notice of Intent Revise651i25izoo7 Ll Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 oacament.Treneacton Number Salem cityrrown B. Resource Area Effects I. Inland Resource Areas Check all that apply below. Attach narrative and any supporting documentation describing how the project will meet all performance standards for each of the resource areas altered, including standards requiring consideration of alternative project design or location. Online Users: Resource Area Size of Pr000sed Alteration include your Proposed Replacement(if any) document transaction a. ❑ Bank 1.linear feet 2.linear feet number b. ❑ Bordering Vegetated (provided on Wetland 1.square feet 2.square feet your receipt page)with all c. ❑ Land Under 1.square feet 2.square feet supplementary Waterbodies and information you Waterways 3.cubic yards dredged submit to the d. Bordering Land Department. Subject to Flooding 1.square feet 2.square feet 3.cubic feet of flood storage lost 4.cubic feet of flood storage replaced e. ❑ Isolated Land Subject to Flooding 1.square feet 2.cubic feet of flood storage lost 3.cubic feet of flood storage replaced ❑ For f. ❑ Riverfront area 1. Name of Waterway(if available) projects impacted by 1. Width of Riverfront Area (check one): the riverfront area and a ❑ 25 ft. -Designated Densely Developed Areas only buffer zone of another ❑ 100 ft. - New agricultural projects only resource area, add ❑ 200 ft. -All other projects 50% to the total fee. 2. Total area of Riverfront Area on the site of the proposed project: Square Feet 3. Proposed alteration of the Riverfront Area: a.Total Square Feet b.Square Feet within 100 ft. a Square Feet between 100 R and 200 R. 4. Has an alternatives analysis been done and is it attached to this NOI? ® Yes[--] ,No 6.Was the lot where the activity is proposed created prior to August 1, 1996? ® Yes❑ No wpafonn3.doc•rev.4112/06 Page 3 of 7 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by 426 DEP 6 : Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands DEP File Number WPA Form 3 - Notice of Intent RPyi Gert 1 zs 2007 Document Transaction Number Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 Salem Cityrrown B. Resource Area Effects 2. Coastal Resource Areas: Check all that apply below. Attach narrative and supporting documentation describing how the project will meet all performance standards for each of the resource areas altered, including standards requiring consideration of alternative project design or location. Online Users: Include your Resource Area Size of Proposed Alteration Proposed Replacement(if any) document transaction a. ❑ Designated Port Areas Indicate size under Land Under the Ocean, below number (provided on b. ❑ Land Under the Ocean 1.square feet your receipt page)with all 2.Cubic yards dredged supplementary Indicate size under Coastal Beaches and/or Coastal Dunes information you c. ❑ Barrier Beach below submit to the Department. d. ❑ Coastal Beaches 1.Square feet 2.Cubic yards beach nourishment e. ❑ Coastal Dunes 1.Square feet 2.Cubic yards dune nourishment f. ❑ Coastal Banks 1.Linear feet g. ❑ Rocky Intertidal Shores 1.Square feet h.❑ Salt Marshes 1.Square feet 2.Sq ft restoration,rehab.,or creation i. ❑ Land Under Salt Ponds 1.Square feet 2.Cubic yards dredged j. ❑ Land Containing Shellfish 1.Square feet 2.Square feet restoration,rehab. k. ❑ Fish Runs Indicate size under Coastal Banks, inland Bank, Land Under the Ocean, and/or inland Land Under Waterbodies and Waterways, above 1.Cubic yards dredged f. ❑ Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage 1.Square feet 3. Limited Project: Is any portion of the proposed activity eligible to be treated as a limited project subject to 310 CMR 10.24 or 310 CMR 10.53? a. ® Yes ❑ No If yes, describe which limited project applies to this project: 10.53q Mitigation of release or threat of release of hazardous material. b.Limited Project wpaform1doc•rev.4112106 Page 4 of 7 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by DEP: Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands 64-426 DEP File Number WPA Form 3 - Notice of Intent Rav; car3 1 /9S /�nn7 Document Transaction Number Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 Salem cityrrown C. Bordering Vegetated Wetland Delineation Methodology Check all methods used to delineate the Bordering Vegetated Wetland(BVW) boundary: Online Users: 1. ❑ Final Order of Resource Area Delineation issued by Conservation Commission or DEP Include your (attached) document transaction 2. ❑ DEP BVW Field Data Form (attached) number (provided on 3 ❑ Final Determination of Applicability issued by Conservation Commission or DEP (attached) your receipt page)with all 4. ® Other Methods for Determining the BVW Boundary(attach documentation): supplementary information you a. ® 50% or more wetland indicator plants submit to the Department. b. ® Saturated/inundated conditions exist c. ❑ Groundwater indicators d. ❑ Direct observation For all projects affecting other e. ® Hydric soil indicators Resource Areas, please c ❑ Credible evidence of conditions prior to disturbance attach a narrative 5. Other resource areas delineated: expininthe resou�w D. Other Applicable Standards and Requirements area was delineated. 1. Is any portion of the proposed project located in estimated habitat as indicated on the most recent Estimated Habitat Map of State-Listed Rare Wetland Wildlife published by the Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program? a. ❑ Yes ® No If yes, include proof of mailing or hand delivery of NOI to: Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program Division of Fisheries and Wildlife Route 135, North Drive b. Date of Map Westborough, MA 01581 2. For coastal projects only, is any portion of the proposed project located below the mean high water line or in a fish run? a.❑ Yes ® No If yes, include proof of mailing or hand delivery of NOI to: Division of Marine Fisheries-Southeast Marine Fisheries Station 50A Portside Drive Pocasset, MA 02559 b. ❑ Not applicable—project is in inland resource area only 3. Is any portion of the proposed project within an Area of Critical Environmental Concern (ACEC)? a. ❑ Yes ® No If yes, provide name of ACEC (see instructions to WPA Form 3 or DEP Website for ACEC locations). Note: electronic filers click on Website. b.ACEC wpafonn3.doc•rev.4/12106 - Page 5 of 7 LlMassachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by DEP: s Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands DEP File umber WPA Form 3 - Notice of Intent Rimed 1 /25/2007 Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 Document Transaction Number. Salem City/sown D. Other Applicable Standards and Requirements Online Users: 4. Is any portion of the site subject to a Wetlands Restriction Order under the Inland Wetlands Include your Restriction Act(M.G.L. c. 131, §40A)or the Coastal Wetlands Restriction Act(M.G.L. c. 130, § 105)? document transaction a. ❑ Yes ® No number (provided on your receipt 5. Is any activity within any Resource Area or Buffer Zone exempt from performance standards of the page)with all wetlands regulations, 310 CMR 10.00. supplementary information you a. ❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe which exemption applies to this project: submit to the Department. b. Exemption 6. Is this project subject to the DEP Stormwater Policy? a. ® Yes ❑ No If yes, stormwater management measures are required. Applicants should complete the Stormwater Management Form and submit it with this form. b. If no, explain why the project is exempt: E. Additional Information Applicants must include the following with this Notice of Intent(NOI). See instructions for details. Online Users:Attach the document transaction number(provided on your receipt page)for any of the following information you submit to the Department 1. ® USGS or other map of the area(along with a narrative description, if necessary)containing sufficient information for the Conservation Commission and the Department to locate the site. (Electronic filers may omit this item.) 2. 0 Plans identifying the location of proposed activities(including activities proposed to serve as a Bordering Vegetated Wetland [BVWj replication area or other mitigating measure) relative to the boundaries of each affected resource area. 3. ❑ Other material identifying and explaining the determination of resource area boundaries shown on plans(e.g., a DEP BVW Field Data Form). 4. ® List the titles and dates for all plans and other materials submitted with this NOI. s. ❑ If there is more than one property owner, please attach a list of these property owners not listed on this form. 6. ❑ Attach proof of mailing for Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program, if needed. 7. ❑ Attach proof of mailing for Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries, if needed. 6. ® Attach NOI Wetland Fee Transmittal Form s. ® Attach Stormwater Management Form, if needed. wpaform3.doc•rev.4/12106 Page 6 of 7 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by DEP: Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands 64-426 DEP File Number WPA Form 3 - Notice of Intent Ravi sPd 1 /29/2007 Document Transaction Number Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 Salem - Cityrrown F. Fees The fees for work proposed under each Notice of Intent must be calculated and submitted to the Conservation Commission and the Department(see Instructions and NOI Wetland Fee Transmittal Form). No filing fee shall be assessed for projects of any city, town, county, or district of the Commonwealth, federally recognized Indian tribe housing authority, municipal housing authority, or the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. Applicants must submit the following information (in addition to pages 1 and 2 of the NOI Wetland Fee Transmittal Form)to confirm fee payment: 1.Municipal Check Number 2.Check date 3.State Check Number 4.Check date 5. Payor name on check:First Name 6.Payor name on check:Last Name G. Signatures and Submittal Requirements I hereby certify under the penalties of perjury that the foregoing Notice of Intent and accompanying plans, documents, and supporting data are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the Conservation Commission will place notification of this Notice in a local newspaper at the expense of the applicant in accordance with the wetlands regulations, 310 CMR 10.05(5)(a). I further certify under penalties of perjury that all abutters were notified of this application, pursuant to the requiremen f M. .L. c. 131, 0. Notice must be made in writing by hand delivery or certified mail jET777 utters within 100 feet of the property lineof the project location. //a6/07 Date 'erent) Date Signature of Representative(if any) Date For Conservation Commission: Two copies of the completed Notice of Intent(Form 3), including supporting plans and documents;two copies of pages 1 and 2 of the NOI Wetland Fee Transmittal Form;and the city/town fee payment must be sent to the Conservation Commission by certified mail or hand delivery. For DEP: One copy of the completed Notice of Intent(Form 3), including supporting plans and documents; one copy of pages 1 and 2 of the NOI Wetland Fee Transmittal Form; and a copy of the state fee payment must be sent to the DEP Regional Office(see Instructions)by certified mail or hand delivery. (E-filers may submit these electronically.) Other: If the applicant has checked the"yes"box in any part of Section D, Item 3, above, refer to that section and the Instructions for additional submittal requirements. The original and copies must be sent simultaneously. Failure by the applicant to send copies in a timely manner may result in dismissal of the Notice of Intent. wpaform3.doc•rev.4/12/06 Page 7 of 7 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands NOI Wetland Fee Transmittal Form Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 Important: A. Applicant Information When filling out forms on the 1. Applicant: computer, use only the tab Mike Ferris A&H Auto Exchange key to move a.First Name b.Last Name c.Company your cursor- 25 Robinson Road do not use the d.Mailing Address return key. Salem MA 01970 e.Cityrrown f.State g.Zip Code as 978-745-3472 h.Phone Number Baa 2. Property Owner(if different): 15 Robinson Road Realty a.First Name b.Last Name Trust 15 Robinson Road d.Mailing Address Salem MA 01970 e.Cityrrown f.State g.Zip Code 978-745-3472 h.Phone Number 3. Project Location: 15 Robinson Road Salem a.Street Address b.City/Town To calculate B. Fees filing fees, refer to the category Notice of Intent(Form 3)or Abbreviated Notice of Intent(Form 4): fee list and examples in the The fee should be calculated using the following six-step instructions for 9 9 p process and worksheet. Please see filling out WPA Instructions before filling out worksheet. Form 3(Notice of Intent). Step lrrype of Activity: Describe each type of activity that will occur in wetland resource area and buffer zone. Step 21Number of Activities: Identify the number of each type of activity. Step 3/Individual Activity Fee: Identify each activity fee from the six project categories listed in the instructions. Step 4/Subtotal Activity Fee: Multiply the number of activities(identified in Step 2)times the fee per category(identified in Step 3)to reach a subtotal fee amount. Note: If any of these activities are in a Riverfront Area in addition to another Resource Area or the Buffer Zone, the fee per activity should be multiplied by 1.5 and then added to the subtotal amount. Step S/Total Project Fee: Determine the total project fee by adding the subtotal amounts from Step 4. Step 6/Fee Payments: To calculate the state share of the fee, divide the total fee in half and subtract $12.50. To calculate the city/town share of the fee, divide the total fee in half and add$12.50. Wpaform3.dw•NOI Wegand Fee Transmittal Farm•rev.311/05 Page 1 of 2 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands NOI Wetland Fee Transmittal Form Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 B. Fees (continued) Step 1/Type of Activity Step 2/Number Step Step 4/Subtotal Activity of Activities 3/individual Fee Activity t ty Fee 2g Stormwater Management 1 $500.00 $500.00 3a Site Preparation 1 $1050.00 $1050.00 Step 5/Total Project Fee: $1550.00 Step 6/Fee Payments: Total Project Fee: $1550.00 a.Total fee from Step 5 State share of filing fee: $762.50 b. 1/2 total fee less$12.50 City/Town share of filling fee: $767.50 c.1/2 total fee plus$12.50 C. Submittal Requirements a.) Complete pages 1 and 2 and send with a check or money order for the state share of the fee, payable to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Department of Environmental Protection Box 4062 Boston, MA 02211 b.) To the Conservation Commission: Send the Notice of Intent or Abbreviated Notice of Intent; a copy of this form; and the city/town fee payment. c.) To DEP Regional Office(see Instructions): Send a copy of the Notice of Intent or Abbreviated Notice of Intent; a copy of this form; and a copy of the state fee payment. (E-filers of Notices of Intent may submit these electronically.) WpePo Idm-NOI Wetland Fee T�itlal Fw -rev.3/1/05 Page 2 of 2 L11Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands Stormwater Management Form Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 A. Property Information Important: When filling out 1. The proposed project is: forms on the computer, use a. New development ❑ Yes ® No only the tab key to move b. Redevelopment ❑ Yes ® No your cursor- do not use the (If yes, distinguish redevelopment components from retuurrn key. c. Combination El Yes ® No new development components on plans). .IfIM I I 2. Stormwater runoff to be treated for water quality is based on the following calculations: "� a. ❑ 1 inch of runoff x total impervious area of post-development site for discharge to critical areas ne (Outstanding Resource Waters, recharge areas of public water supplies, shellfish growing areas, swimming beaches, cold water fisheries). Note: b. ® 0.5 inches of runoff x total impervious area of post-development site for other resource areas. This November 2000 version of the Stormwater Management B. Stormwater Management Standards Form supersedes earlier versions including those 9 Y(March 1997 ement DEP's Stormwater Management Polic includes nine standards that are listed on the ) contained in following pages. Check the appropriate boxes for each standard and provide documentation and DEP's additional information when applicable. Stormwater Handbooks. Standard#1: Untreated stormwater a. ® The project is designed so that new stormwater point discharges do not discharge untreated stormwater into, or cause erosion to, wetlands and waters. Standard#2: Post-development peak discharges rates a. ❑ Not applicable—project site contains waters subject to tidal action. Post-development peak discharge does not exceed pre-development rates on the site at the point of discharge or downgradient property boundary for the 2-yr, 10-yr, and 100-yr, 24-hr storm. b. [' Without stormwater controls c. ® With stormwater controls designed for the 2-yr, and 10-yr storm, 24-hr storm. d. ® The project as designed will not increase off-site flooding impacts from the 100-yr, 24-hr stone. VVW( Idm•Stormwater Management F=-rev.31IMS Pegs 1 or 5 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands Stormwater Management Form Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 B. Stormwater Management Standards (cont.) Standard#3: Recharge to groundwater Amount of impervious area(sq. ft.)to be infiltrated: 11 ,760 a.square feet Volume to be recharged is based on: b. [J The following Natural Resources Conservation Service hydrologic soils groups (e.g. A, B, C, D, or UA)or any combination of groups: —20% infiltrator c66 pond C 1.%of impervious area 2.Hydrologic soil group 3.%of impervious area 4.Hydrologic soil group 12% forebav C 5.%of impervious area 6.Hydrologic soil group 7.%of impervious area 8.Hydrologic soil group c. ❑ Site specific pre-development conditions: 1.Recharge rate 2.Volume d. Describe how the calculations were determined: -11- 10"/Hr applied to sandy gni1s , qpp standard 't table e. List each BMP or nonstructural measure used to meet Standard#3(e.g. dry well, infiltration trench). ( 2 ) j401 iiiilt atnr ,a fQrebay and infiltrtion pond Does the annual groundwater recharge for the post-development site approximate the annual recharge from existing site conditions? f. ® Yes ❑ No Standard#4: 80%TSS Removal a. ® The proposed stormwater management system will remove 80% of the post-development site's average annual Total Suspended Solids(TSS) load. b. Identify the BMP's proposed for the project and describe how the 80%TSS removal will be achieved. Oil separator manhole surface infiltrators detention ponds and grassy swale WWcrm3.doc•Stomiweter Management farm•rev.W/O Page 2 of 5 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands Stormwater Management Form Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 B. Stormwater Management Standards (cont.) c. If the project is redevelopment, explain how much TSS will be removed and briefly explain why 80% removal cannot be achieved. Standard#5: Higher potential pollutant loads See Stormwater Policy Handbook Does the project site contain land uses with higher potential pollutant loads Vol. I, page 1-23, for land uses of a. ® Yes ❑ No b. If yes, describe land uses: high pollutant loading (see Storage of cars for parts and metal recycling. Instructions). c. Identify the BMPs selected to treat stormwater runoff. If infiltration measures are proposed, describe the pretreatment. (Note: If the area of higher potential pollutant loading is upgradient of a critical area, infiltration is not allowed.) Deep sump catch basin oil separator, oil absorbent logs, recharger infiltrators and grassy swale Standard#6: Protection of critical areas See Stormwater Will the project discharge to or affect a critical area? Policy Handbook Vol. I,page 1-25, for critical areas a. ❑ Yes ® No b. If yes, describe areas: (see Instructions). c. Identify the BMPs selected for stonnwater discharges in these areas and describe how BMPs meet restrictions listed on pages 1-27 and 1-28 of the Stormwater Policy Handbook—Vol. I: Wpafam3Aoc•Stmmwater MenagemeM Form•rev.311105 Page 3 of 5 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands Stormwater Management Form Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 B. Stormwater Management Standards (cont.) Note: components of Standard#7: Redevelopment projects redevelopment projects which Is the proposed activity a redevelopment project? plan to develop previously a. ❑ Yes ® No b. If yes, the following stormwater management standards have been met: undeveloped areas do not fall under the scope of Standard 7. c. The following stormwater standards have not been met for the following reasons: d. ❑ The proposed project will reduce the annual pollutant load on the site with new or improved stormwater control. Standard#8: Erosion/sediment control a. ® Erosion and sediment controls are incorporated into the project design to prevent erosion, control sediments, and stabilize exposed soils during construction or land disturbance. Controls include berms, oil logs, staked hay bales and siltation fence. Standard#9: Operationimaintenance plan a. ® An operation and maintenance plan for the post-development stormwater controls have been developed. The plan includes ownership of the stormwater BMPs, parties responsible for operation and maintenance, schedule for inspection and maintenance, routine and long-term maintenance responsibilities, and provision for appropriate access and maintenance easements extending from a public right-of-way to the stormwater controls. AMRPlan, Mai * n t a i c i of + /25/07 b.Plan/Title c.Date d.Planrntle e.Date VJpafalm3.dw-Sbnnwater M nage Fa -m.31=5 Page 4 M 5 l Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands Stormwater Management Form Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 C. Submittal Requirements Online Users: DEP recommends that applicants submit this form, as well as, supporting documentation and plans, Include your with the Notice of Intent to provide stormwater management information for Commission review document consistent with the wetland regulations (310 CMR 10.05 (6)(b)) and DEP's Stormwater Management transaction Policy(March 1997). If a particular Stormwater management standard cannot be met, information number should be provided to demonstrate how equivalent water quality and water quantity protection will be (provided on provided. DEP encourages engineers to use this form to certify that the project meets the stormwater your receipt management standards as well as acceptable engineering standards. For more information, consult page)with all the Stormwater Management Policy. supplementary information you submit to the Department. D. Signatures Michael Ferris P 6/0 7 Applicant Name Date Aignatur i 6Y'uGr/ Representative(if any) Date Signature WpaWm3.dw•3tarmw r Management Forth•rev.31IM5 Page 5 0!5 Table 2 A & H Auto Standard 2 Pre & Post Peak Flows (CFS) Storm Frequency 2 year 10 year 25 year 50 year 100 year SC 1 Operations Pre 7.84 13.32 17.08 21.48 25.52 SC 1 Operations Post 7.53 12.75 16.33 20.52 24.37 SC 2 Storage Pre 7.40 12.23 15.51 19.37 22.91 SC 2 Storage Post 5.98 9.88 12.54 15.66 18.52 SC 3 Liner Pre 0 0 0 0 0 SC 3 Liner Post 1.16 1.77 2.19 2.65 3.15 P 2 Pond Pre 0 0 0 0 0 P 2 Pond Post 1.19 1.64 8.87 26.07 36.11 RI Stream Pre 7.84 12.58 16.16 20.38 24.31 RI Stream Post 0.88 1.28 8.87 26.07 36.11 R2 Culvert Pre 7.23 12.55 16.12 20.34 24.27 R2 Culvert Post 0.88 1.28 7.46 21.35 32.47 Ll Stream @ PL Pre 14.25 24.50 31.31 t 39.34 t 46.81 t Ll Stream @ PL Post 0.88 1.28 7.46 21.26 32.41 *A 25-year or better pre development storm splits flow between brook and road,but the rate is not known. t Brook culvert under Robinson Road(24")had capacity when new of 46 CFS. However the stone construction has buckled and actual capacity appears closer to 26 CFS. The brook has overflowed Robinson Road several times in the last five years. Note: These figures do not include the Aggregate Pond which is limited by a 24"discharge pipe. The Hydrocad data for the site contribution has been prepared for the NOI. A&H AUTO STANDARD 3 RECHARGE TO GROUNDWATER Proposed Impervious Area= 0.27 AC (Post) = 0.27 AC Net Gain Liner Recharge Lost HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP AREA(AQ Rate Volume A .00(post) — .00 (pre) _ .00 x .4" _ .00 AC IN B .00 (post) — .00 (pre)_ .00 x.25" = 0 C .27 (post) — .00(pre) _ .27 x.10" _ .027 AC IN D .00 (post) — .00 (pre)= Waive = 0 Total .027 AC IN Recharge Volume : from Infiltrators .051 AC x .10"= .0051 AC IN from Forebay .029 AC x .10"_ .0029 from Pond .178 AC x .10"= .0178 Total Recharge Volume=0.0258 A&H AUTO Standard 4, Solids Removal TSS REMOVAL CALCULATIONS A B C D E TSS Removal Starting TSS Amount Remaining BMP Rate % Load * Removed (BxQ Load (C-D) SC-1 Liner Deep Sump+ 25 100* mg/1 25 75 Oil Separator MH Infiltrators 80 75 60 15 85%RE SC-2 Drainage channel 10 100 10 90 Forebay 25 90 22.5 67.5 Infiltration Pond 70 67.5 47.2 20.2 79.8%RE AVERAGE TSS REMOVAL 82.4 % * Equals load which enters the BMP A&H AUTO EXCHANGE MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE FOR BMP Standard 9 Structure Inspection Maintenance Liner Bed MonthlyRemove oil stained dirt re e as , grad necessary,pick-up parts and trash, cover any exposed liner Deep Sump Annually Sump to be cleaned 1 time per year. Catch Basins& Oil log replaced 1 time/year or more Oil Separator often if soiled Recharger Units Annually To be cleaned when sediment level Is greater than 6",replace if collapsed. Grassy berms Inspect after every Berms and the pond shall be mowed Major storm event twice during growing season and For first 3 months accumulated leaves,trash and debris after construction, removed(June and October). then twice per year. Infiltration Pond& Annually Sediment to be removed as necessary Overflow Structure when greater than 6"deep. Sediment removal should not take place until bottom of basin is dry. Deep tilling can be used to break up clogged surface areas. Over flood weir and surface baffle shall be kept level and intact, any berm erosion should be repaired immediately. Velocity Barriers & Twice Annually Remove plastic, sticks,leaves, Forebay check sediment level,clean and Rebuild when>12"deep. i PERMIT cros®xce SITE PLAN •�,•� xmm•snaxc>�wae arm k FOR W "°"" - �� 15 Robinson Road a awsr LLtiLB I[4P mva,+xv s.km mssz�hxwa0i9'ro — waanro.aw+ww� _ SP Engineering, Inc. —o—uwa rm+an.m�a aim mr_____� /r \ �—/ 4 / rwu as conmxu sma / Y wa r ° nwc F£ , � � s.�,maax:n�zwmaroro � F v .es M ;Y g n o HANOK ASSOCIATES / Z k ttx,na[ KP ___ .____ s I e I ae �c .' •'' a�iu mus 1 �o.wanm"„^. � r i .arc 0.1 111 .i _ �c-, aTv aF-sa� A Gn:/NIN/sIR/Es LYWSfR✓A na SIE PLM Mt8 ' DEPTH H Side Pond 2 LOCATION Bottom Pond T (Feet) MW-3 tNT6 4 HNu TN u Crushed Stone 0 Brown Loam 0 1 Tan Green Sand and Silt 0 Brown Loam 0 Iand Large Rocks . . W 2 Tan Green Sand and Silt 0 Brown Loam 0 Lots of Large Rock and Large Rocks 3 Tan Green Sand and Silt 0 Tan SIV Y a Grey Sand 0 Lots of Large Rock 4 Grey Sand and Silt 0 Tan Grey Sand 0 1 1 5 Brown Sand, Large Rock 0 Moist ITan Sand 0 W W 6 Brown Sand and Silt 0 Red Brown Sand 0 1 Moist Grey Sand, Odor 3 Wet Sides 0 0 GW 8--Wet Grey Sand/Clay Q 1 Light Tan Sand GW 9 Red Silt and Sand 10 Monitoring Well to 8' Monitoring Well to 10' 11 -- 12-- Soil 112Soil Togs A& H Auto Exchange ' DEPTH Iaffirators LOCATION Pond (Feet) TP-3 TP-4 HNu HNU Loam & 3" Rock 99.75 EL Stone, Steel, Rubber and Wood 81.00 EL 1 3" Rock Dark Silt and Gravel 2 Grey Sand ,Gravel and Rock 3 Grey Sand Z�l HWT Grey-Brown Sand S-2 4 and Rock 5 Red-Brown Sand 0 S-1 GW (Soil Sample) Large Rock 75.00 EL 7--Brown Silty Sand Q Moist and Tight HWT 8-- Red gown Sand 9 90.75 EL Large Rock or Ledge 10 11 No GW Noted 12-- 13 1 Soil Logs A&& H Auto Exchange 4 DEPTH Pond LOCATION Pond (Feet) TP-5 TP-6 HNu HNu Brown Sand and Rock 80.83 EL Loam, Rock and Glass 82.32 EL I 1 Dark Grey Sand and Stone 2 Grey Sand and Lynnpac 3 Dark Silt and Roots Tan and Grey Sand 4 Minor Stone 5 Tan-Red Sand Z� S-3 p HWT HWT 7-- A Silt and Clay 73.83 EL 0 GW GW No Ledge 75.32 EL 8-- 9-- 10__910 11 12 13 1 Soil dogs A& H Auto Exchange • D [T'ENGINEERING, I C. P.O. Box 848 - Salem, Massachusetts 01970 -Telephone: 978-745-4569 • Fax: 978-745-4881 Client: A+H Auto Exchange Inc. Date: October 15, 2006 15 Robinson Rd. Salem, Ma. 01970 BMP Infiltrators LAB CERTIFICATION #:M-MA034 --------------------------- LABORATORY REPORT ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sample Type: Soil @4' Sample From: Test Pit 3 Sample ID#: 609017 Date Method# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ • Total Solids 94.5 09/26/06 •Volatile Solids - 0.79 - 09/26/06 ASTM 2974-87 • Moisture 5.50 _ 09/26/06 • Grain Size Analysis 09/26/06 ASTM 1998a % Gravel (Sieve 4) 18.2 % Coarse Sand (Sieve 40) 35.0 % Sand Medium (Sieve 100) 18.6 % Sand Fine (Sieve 270) 10.7 % Silt& Clay (Pan Fraction) 17.5 Sampled By: B.Poole Sampled On: 09/14/06 Sample Received: 09/14/06 •The information contained in this report is, to the best of my knowledge accurate and complete. Date: Laboratory Director: * OFD LF ENGINEERING, Co P.O. Box 848 - Salem, Massachusetts 01970 -Telephone: 978-745-4569 = Fax: 978-745-4881 Client: A+H Auto Exchange Inc. Date: October 15, 2006 15 Robinson Rd. Salem, Ma. 01970 BMP Pond LAB CERTIFICATION #:M-MA034 ----------------------- LABORATORY REPORT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Sample Type: Soil @4' Soil @4' Sample From: Test Pit 4 Test Pit 6 Sample ID#: 609018 609019 Date Method# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % Total Solids 79.4 93.7 09/26/06 •Volatile Solids 1.35 0.60 09/26/06 ASTM 2974-87 • Moisture 20.6 6.30 09/26/06 • Grain Size Analysis 09/26/06 ASTM 1998a % Gravel (Sieve 4) 3.52 11.4 % Coarse Sand (Sieve 40) 39.5 56.6 % Sand Medium (Sieve 100) 23.8 18.1 % Sand Fine (Sieve 270) 13.9 5.61 % Silt & Clay (Pan Fraction) 19.2 8.29 Sampled By: B.Poole Sampled On: 09/14/06 Sample Received: 09/14/06 . The information contained in this report is, to the best of my knowledge accurate and complete. Date: Laboratory Director: PATROWICZ LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING February 22, 2007 Salem Conservation Commission Municipal Offices 120 Washington Street Salem, MA 01970 RE: Robinson Road and adjacent properties, Salem, MA Dear Commission Members: On behalf of the Mongiellos (direct abutters to work being proposed), I would like to again express several serious concerns with the report and plans by SP Engineering and supplemental information/plans/calculations prepared by Hancock Associates. I have reviewed the following documents recently delivered to my office: • Best Management Practices Plan (report) prepared by SP Engineering, Inc, dated: revised January, 2007, • Data Report prepared by Hancock Associates, dated: February 1, 2007, • Site Plan (PS-1)prepared by Hancock Associates dated: February 5, 2007, • Existing Watershed Map (PS-2) prepared by Hancock Associates dated: February 5, 2007, • Proposed Watershed Map (PS-3)prepared by Hancock Associates dated: February 5, 2007, • Note and Details(plan) (PS-4)prepared by Hancock Associates dated: February 5, 2007. I walked the site on several occasions since 7/25/06 and have taken photographs. My observations, questions, concerns, comments and recommendations can be summarized as follows: 1. The 50-scale plans submitted are very hard to read and do not show enough critical detail for such a complex area such as this is. I highly recommend that more detail (at 10-scale) is presented and extraneous information, such as old contour lines 78 and 24m are removed. I recommend that the design engineer show the proposed grading design at a one-foot contour interval for the entire proposed work area(for the complete stormwater management system) including: (1) closure of dangling contours (connecting them into real existing conditions) considering geotechnical alterations that may be required to stabilize slopes (show the modified slopes), (2) the area adjacent to Aggregate Industries (existing slope where the 2'berm is proposed), (3)proposed wetland filling/alteration (show amount filled), (4)proposed wetland replication grading design (I did not see any proposed replication on this plan). 14 Brown Street, Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Cell: 978-836-6400 Fax: 978-745-4110 Email: scott.patrowicz@verizon.net 2. For years now(after many discussions to curtail the problem), runoff from the up-gradient abutter has uncontrollably flooded the Mongiello's property(photographs attached 5/16/06). Therefore, for the designer to simply match"existing conditions", is simply not enough stormwater control especially given the lack of hydraulic capacity at the Robinson Road stone culvert(photographs attached 11/16/06) and certainly does not do nearly enough to correct the annoying flooding problem. The critical outfall point is this stone culvert on the upstream side of Robinson Road. This stone culvert is old and small (approximately: 12"wide x 15"tall, but depending on where you measure, i.e. underneath Robinson Road, it might be smaller, since it is simply made up of stacked granite slabs). The designer has not analyzed this critical point,yet this is where runoff leaves the up-gradient abutter and flows into the Mongiello's property. I recommend a full hydrologic analysis to determine the impacts at this critical outfall point onto Mongiello's property. 3. The area of the existing watershed flowing into the Robinson Road stone culvert (as depicted by the attached USGS map) is huge. I strongly recommend, that a hydrologic analysis be performed to determine the impacts to the Mongiello property and Robinson Road(measured at this pinch point) from the entire regional watershed area(accurately mapped based on field verification regarding questionable areas &watershed divides& flow paths). This analysis will give holistic view of the magnitude of the runoff water hitting the Robinson Road stone culvert at the Mongiello's property line. There are several factors to consider when doing this regional hydrologic analysis: (a) Unfortunately,the storage capacity of the up-gradient pond is not very large since the brook's invert is close to pond's water level. (b) Another factor is: the ditch that was cut across Robinson Road (as mentioned in my 7/27/06 letter, where the little wooden bridge is now, as the Commission saw at our site walk on 9/9/06), needs to be filled in, as it was, since pond water never did cross Robinson Road at this point. 4. The designer has considered the top of the hill (where the crusher operation and large rock/soil pile)not contributing runoff the Robinson Road. This assumption needs field verification. There may be a blockage (as shown on the attached photograph), to prevent runoff from flowing across the northwesterly property line. Runoff may actually be flowing down the gravel path into Watershed 2S, therefore making it much larger,thus more water contributing to the critical outfall point(Robinson Road stone culvert). 5. Given,these considerations (above comments 2-4), will Robinson Road get flooded, especially since the hydraulic capacity of the stone culvert at Robinson Road is so small and proposed is a 36-ich culvert outfall? Also,the submitted plan shows outfall point#3 as a 24"x 36" culvert. This needs to be re-measured, since it's mouth appears to be only about 8"x 36" (with a trash- rack grate in front of it, frequently cleaned by the Mongiello's). PATROWICZ LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING 6. Assuming the watersheds were mapped correctly, what mitigative measures are being proposed to maximize protection of those other down-gradient properties such as the golf park and abutting wetland communities and Swampscott Road. 7. The design engineer has collected all the runoff from watershed 2S and 6S (approximately 5 acres, which requires field verification) and concentrated the runoff, discharging it into a small "detention basin"then into the Robinson Road brook using a 36"outfall culvert. The invert out for the 36-inch pipe is elevation 78.5 compared with the bottom of the "detention basin" designed to be elevation 78.0. Therefore, the "detention basin"will actually never detain the large volume of stormwater runoff from this 5-acre watershed. The runoff water flowing into the"detention basin"will basically flow out, with this 36-inch culvert outlet pipe. The design engineer has stated approximately 17 CFS (which is 127 gallons per second). What is the current flow rate at this proposed point of discharge? Will the wetlands at this point of discharge be impacted negatively? 8. Will the 36"outfall have a tailwater condition due to the brook bank being underwater(runoff from up-gradient pond and/or water backing up from Robinson Road stone culvert? 9. A detail should be provided showing the detailed grading of the outfall pipe relative to the wetlands. 10. The plan presented does not depict how much bank is altered. 11. I recommend additional specification regarding the type and method of construction for the different soil/material types for the berm, sidewalls of the"detention area" and slope stabilization. The Hancock detail specifies that the berm is made up of"native parent soil, suitable to engineer". This seems vague. Is the soil clean? MHD spec? 12. Silt and erosion continue to flow into the brook from the up-gradient property even though haybales have been placed. Refer to the 11/16/06 photographs. 13. Is a wildlife habitat analysis and mitigation required? 14. Is an Army Corps permit required? Is a DEP Water.Quality Certification required? 15. Has the City issued a drainage alteration permit? Has the City Engineer reviewed this application and plans? PATROWICZ LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING : 16. What measures are being employed to remove pollutants that may be generated from the existing land use? Is a LSP required to make an evaluation and recommendations for pollutant control flowing into the downstream wetlands? 17. A NPDES permit will likely be required for alteration greater than one-acre. Will a LSP prepare a detailed spill prevention plan as well as a detailed operations&maintenance plan (more tailored for the high pollutant loads) using the guidelines of the EPA? 18. The SP Engineering report(page 2) suggests that there will be a concrete V-notched weir. The Hancock plan did not show this,but did show a 36" culvert outfall directed into the brook. 19.Are there other ways to divide-up the watershed, so that treatment & detention be achieved, and so that all of the flow from the salvage site is not concentrated at the brook? 20. Is this brook part of the watershed for the Marblehead Town water supply? Are there any Outstanding Water Resource Areas, ACEC, critical watershed protection districts, or Zone A? The Mongiello's and I will attend tonight's meeting with the Conservation Commission and present thi tter expressing our concerns and questions. Thank you Sincerel , PATR CZ LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING ScottPatrowicz, P.E. PATROWICZ LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING �,,IIa.r,.,((` ROBINSON ROAD a.lti�tJ�� t <i•4.� \ .�._ � ,t,�r" (,sot�, ....✓. ��F" `^-.'`1 t�`"l +, � .`"� •�.,. r,, -..) WATERSHED .` kt •• • i3f'Vim,. �'. � ...,. /. i•-" v.�±•.,,� •. +i:.ZflJ i�� `�� !�,,,,`�(�.. � -:� �. ��J��K� � �J IISGS TWuwaOhk Maps 25 PncenN Transparent . � y .00 r4 , _�.`"__ ... . A 4. - '_ ✓5�! a ` >n„ ^ s'W Mw, I� Massadnmetts Ta � wns _ _ �• c na�o.n ♦� � '•,{� ��Y� S��^"�� , � � � � 6ourvJarias..DulliiiC! '/ t -t�.,•�` ,; ' k1? wi valrb fox ail 6.5 'v.� d1� `�dti.� G� �,.,•_� kAdy�..l � . . 1s'a` i r'•t ,r �l� J' fa aa�200 m (1:9658") ' RaEWdsa/Mk��m��P�Mrta WPWWa7003 Pda'ar@Nn pr�rly'.6e npndawC Wget apRPPAL:1Ms mP ab.s mt ewt ieYbeeM . •ter .nid e.nat M mad a/esa�aa.Pkase.Dread a'�>dM�a'a.affi..nmhPts, �1 t 1 "� _ - . — ___ -__.._ GT3a° s"'Fca' .T'S "�1`d fie.. '."" A'i r le{Il ul rr p _- y,:�4p<. N P ti�rth,, Web Images News Maps Classifieds More- Welcome ColleLtions i; Driving directions AD ��'';' � u + '� ,c r� �a' a t" `"d , •� � =fes �� . ` . r•� � ^.r,� ;ys�"j��yr-�3i1' u" ` r��'��uy4rw; � 1�M, rl y) ." � � A'r�' r I...;,. �k •'''.n"� e §� �y�r t �• � xrl�f' � � ,4 Y .` �`� , � r it �I'. li, �LLiner�- - 34 Y 7 ,y'l W'4 A. • moi t_: -�p � - � ,A4:L.± I��F � �A i� �SS. fi� i ^.r.'"d'.Yi ��{''.. W 5 "n" ;.' ' •� �, :.rr' � ki ra r .'p-r �.y is 9' _ ��r s4 /'+ �• _ A,. 1 R 1?�-,yN Ie ' 14 I �.� � � +. •{�itir SsaM .� 1. c .�,��yt� �i _ ;,-..J . � + ' �� .� r'ryu SS-tiff-" : �„�'>'�5e�i .� ;k iii � ,.;ypl� `'� � ,:..c'^m"�'env m�.�u,�eur,t• I� 1. ROBINSON ROAD 2005 AERIAL a . a ,Gt 1 ° �-� ��s .� � ••�a• a ' ,fit �y .^• }� 1 - t. '� ?..:X FwJ zone IIsZone ItsEJ . r Color oHlhos 2095 � e 9 Fy—J Major EOT OTP Roads by[lass 'M1u ar COT OTn Roads t.. .:!ass �� +'rC�4 �,. wb ,F lY _ y�•, A/ .e WK vnf 4T •7$i#kp.Vi `Y }� v RE Massachusetts Towns +��R�Ff 11 J�l(. �Yi :I •��q 1 Y ,y �J� 't\ 4ryY�` 1 j�{y A A '� 3 � Jh � B ram• ��1 a YV'a y Miy R h_ vQi �.--"�` MIR �" .� 311. _ .y;c�.•,�,_ �#.� awwwwwwwo 190 m (1:6498) Cad\rds of Mrs mp are 0*Ytipw 2005 h4RRMW:7&v mato does aot met natbrar M wG1S,ad my mt 8e mpmdhmed nNmed my accraacy standards.and earamt be used yAor oslMort yermisabnhre erMs yreyosas.Please co=& awm rri ofasa at MlysPbww.sbte.m.usrAmgLV , + t.7- 7777" 7, —� k ;� ��, -f�';�' '' '� �• �a +� '�� 4lpnhrr k In t Immm:qU I pl a _ . . _. . Welcome Collections- Driving directions Traffic camme Share- Print, 1"' •+ysNy, k rtit'�` rJ n( '�,�f" t I 7 I T� 1�` r '� jt r rr J4 � n'ryy` � � r i A� •OM1 rt i ��r rx $€i a •� , . .F' ! �^I, 1�"",�y, �"'4 pa' ;,� r. '. us N �� r +t" .6 '"33 "qh■�'.� ■ `. �}' *�'fy � tb i t } �'!: in'f"r. .^ra .g�"•6 i:.�+t"Ihw is 1..�� }��AA�p� .r""q. tr ,tlt ��{' aa �' p _ ' r�•.r _9' �I rtp i�kxU�r yer�'x-v+a"j gr "'i^'•4 Nr y'Y .: ,,. tu� �1. �# Yr I.#��'i * �`��r'` ,•j'�`, ##3r Turp�+ tj g �,r. f �., Y t 9.��+. ,� • t -r w•, ,3 > �3 ra M I �6 1. ,t`w rx � - Y d. .t rt<_�� :":�• ��"4+ ■ -k.brw �it dtw 'b5r +t, ,g iirRe f rt r "� t •� ��Rf}- . w� * 5•�'/� 1 ,�� "•w ljP' �i711'.7 11 r, �'� �"" . , T 7ylirr P s r 1"'� 'jr" �•�"� �r��i�ZI y �:'� S 'af'`''ar, ?:'w"'� `+`.ntd "' :y, k � �(� ' 4i r Y J } i r:l �6tl;, ,.r � MN 4,■�'kAA�I r � A' � ,f'qr. F` j �' '�'' I In :,r j' r f t �lH - � 1'�'•°`'°+Vt'� *'" , ��Y?> :�j n,y'" :;•`�Y't4M. .I �w, y:aF ::. :r -"� kn: N t �7r .� �.. -�4 '1/�T• 1. ' *0*4ti'ur ..t Y IffiIJ}np�,} �, •i x,�x¢,L.��ii4p r;.ir,r.,...n:.,,r.,..r..r :f nns r.nn.r.rry'n.w..r.r.. r�r, f File Edt View FwmW Took Help E.1911 4- n 4 A t Q Beck ' :cl 1 J«'Search :°Favorites $;' c'a -:i'l. links » Address http jnocal.We.coW ®Go ' arch for a business or category _ i address:ortandmark i law Businesses _-11 _ �_ i Web images News Maps—�, Classifieds More J._. Welcome Collactions, Driving directions Traffic Locate me Share� Print- " . a+' mm vow, 7•' t i •!"x xT ..KT WIN `' 5 yJ��,,,�� .- a +sn`k!4 w: t•a -..(1J -} 'R+e't x* t .�' C - �I�1�1 II�� +C:> I :l 7'^'"�.. ,p"y}'4.,w�.,�w• .e„ e� .,,, i�k�t5y>„�y �Y';� "v.: - q e.tiiT` +� Z W f •'t«. T s' r s'F. t 4 + �' Y'� ��.� {t�'..c� e. �r��nt��•S� c'"i + A . .-r R• x' �{ �� `�{'§, ,A•(V1. .p �.y tYy'Y+�t�1J "5.4� ,ty{,rkv td "! p�.,�4¢ I_.. - { �F ?1 {�ff�FY ',•�.a yn�,�r�M-+i' Y.I" ids � M�1. ��` `�''t�ri a'c' "s��v t� i'Y u a- � i Ti ,'•"� +� y � °� �ia y� i' ehe3 S y� �• 'x� �� t � -yt�J�i yr'�'1>- _ Y6f d�sV 4 �I,. �� $r� 1 h sa ti.{ 8� ..�,�y S 4 C' 'yap, �+ � ,, ,q• :naw ;• �, y�r�Sn �+. �' '�. �y�+. .�?�{ a9r,. j:� ,'�Y �t ,r � - AiIT P. fm ':eJ 2006 Nlicrrsoft Corrorabon Privacy rod--of conduct Lagel TradPrnafk= DevO pr.rs r—f�f About j Hip I 'raa_+,Clad:. Dam <I r—1 t ! F—Fee*t • :�! N. #��V`i� �^ a tq�� v(I��•V .\s...+rac a��l �ly /` ;iii �'��_ ..,P, m `. k•h�`IA�\�j��v�u{{.��y�A{ S :f . �ti'♦ ryZ."�,4 Sz. .. \ { ]; �' 1 ,4y" 1w On eAPVAA n. kv LA �rkw, IVA . 7 n PT � -it�• �� Y's r � 4` .k. *�,f� c, � ��f'}l'Rsaa � fS 4 r � ....>�yy, � ...: 1. '�pM - �'"• ... ��^'f Rt "� ,,r � .. , - ��F- '� � �-�r�'�-ey Y ; • .t/"ya4'�" � RI I� � �,Y�'S�~ i �M•. �r x �, � • � � k� * ab s:r� �°�• $�hk �•t- - _i, ,,,,, ��1s.'r �I � ��ihl' i jKF,'� y{y�j- .vw a ,may; 4,� yy.f W• .. r `"i'1I'9�♦. "+ 't - 'My' x,' A` RY/ 1f, !M ,w 2�" _.. ��•' M '�*}A .� yqY �k o- '4.�af�� .F .R,. W t. r Y a ayE d a,e "'FlS � ,mea � y ��•.�nr�. '�`._ t ,aJ' , f"4ff r 3 w a •� -. 5 >lE+ t z '� *t ,� f( ,� .tf - t '2=a•u.'�.-'.. 1 'h,,r�a' ` �„-•o �` }• 3 �i,� 3��1'E' rY'�� .,6 'pP,F�7n� 5 �'`^. .� !' _ 7 'u��p S+'€\� �.*d�b�'ti$'F,,s�nY'i'„ 0<�6�y � �nJ ; -:-n !' _ - r l'�i!,•� j`��'�^jdt � may.{ 'yi �. ��`�� h t �+ �T"'�e f �l 5i r MM � h' �s�i W � 1 l �i Y f�� e 3�''c``S'k-• � �7y t 5� p�t't��`�� 7+ d �. ,�, ' t y.h.i" T �� 'k o-b �.t '�" �� A <. � �qP ep •,,�t�' > lY�`'� } �'b � ,1 t � .p crq•;, n�" �. y� �Ta •� lY +sx e ,> x > t � ��'i�i,akA3 '�;��r _ 'a s� raw �Cf t1 ��.<_ PA I4 #y'9, wfy. F "S , st" ...... '+ %i•�a. "C`1L',.`'�.+5 �}�• 'i e F M� "a ,A'*,:: ,r.k �p�.t !%wi+U r.. Y 'y. �j ° , 'Iw�1'E►{ Z As P , m�. `1 •E T ep- � � P .p�A �� r�� w....v.�.-. `t"��'aj!,►�,'�1. y. �� #1* `� *r,/ �ci.WY..." Er`d±'� �� +8'v`,*^ � •�r�'a� F a s Vie. x�, a.r * ri f a�- " ' �' 0 3.0 '"rm'�`#�" �i�"�y. '�'-m�.ka'1�,rW�.� �a � �" � � r• " ,®,'�a�` t�S.�,9,, � .yti� ��' DIY� .�� `��►� . '�. .., ,� l t� �;:;.. �`; �' : � Y b: s � :y'r• � �• .� 1 t�&'S4 WN �6��"" t i V .a„ ��•��d'' �'�R r ` P Kid pp ♦ �a Gg 17 _ ! '-ter• � ;. 4�xx�r � . t �w� : ,q�4 d � IU r#1�q�a• �o� {b`��ii-' ri' 'Me" a PM •a - ,� &�' � a.F'y, r X "t';' Mor • ?'r �r. tbY �x y. r.l ' � w .• 1 � � ay...... t 1 h rs m^ � a yd � c kv yJx af, i ' a .: � 'Gndn� �A! •. f•: A��. i Y� �. ..0 .,{r+ '�:yh^�.y 4°s� +.•y .. .a' "HC - r-`S,,yf xv - d4 ♦ � • �w.,v'. k . � h��4�� q*..�'a, '� mai "x ��. � �� :I�y,. b • a �r h = Y. - f Y j) ___ x.. #• 14 r e—i h :.#��r' T.��} t `° � � �}}{, '�;, rt)J ,� �'¢C'�l`~l.�p �� j. !� .ryy. J 7. .:��vS�e. enX+ S 4' Y' �f'/ 'A.i. � � r �. •'♦ .Pr Y Ffh .1 r7 9 TSL • r Our *y _ytI 40 ar� VY,� a ��t�..V:..:+,........ ...r,i'r+�9..Ci .`'�lff!'irfaf�.'iA_a �L�if.Y....� a.. �r�•� IR.WB 4.: ��^ ,. N .�. • �� ._,I r- .a..�.,.lumr •T._-- ��-..�—.a.reT.-.. •� ��•-0' � _� _ _ � � _ I - }� f, + 1�. I ��.•+d,�. ....,. .�.>...�+c'-..�i. "�`n� -'-�- _^ -= , µms, 1,..., � � �t ';a' `dw � ,e A YS k` � 1 -J�T✓( ,T- }, �Ifl..�_ �.p� R'K.. o_ . Me WA IL IT .!' •r r- ,r�,t'y.` 'r' �•M1 ` � `s '��,- - .. T Y"- �ewtiti4r ��.`.. .. r .T�. y' ♦fF ,0', / ,-.x a--+`,SEs_,+w� 4�''q+r_=rle�' IF• _v^F .. �� _--'� 2•r"-'�P°�ter'" �+..'�-��..L"wt.'s1 d'"L_T ,_ice , ` rT•^'lI1L-ir � ..e��......_. '1si $4Y•� a S,.'•`..i. � I�e�y�... -.t1T� 1ti'G�' �RYgM�...P. '1MPR� 'TV. t _ h'1.14, _ .. ZVI �iY,�.�r .i...�FJ_�f."�'' • �'. ,al s1 �v5'T ww J � •'--i�..^. i'`^sT�� s 1 • a rA P.A. � ^'Y 4 ��e•$r .., �r� ^I^r. ..t a.,y{y Y •s"- .Sit-r ',�+„"� Ix w. . � _ , d � 15 - y,•u.�h r�yy.Ay�'y �.,M Y T d�_�.9✓b�� v��'h .1 NI ""fir idl �1 at•' `` ! r u�«:,�"� , iE✓'w � " r , 1 i. eV 'int '� }„�yi''� �'tw- .Ir `a :'�. ... 3� � w(�it�� , �?"' �� 1�._ar r �• � . �3 �t1 � ."' ^ / WIT pin^YN•" 11�rpr �� rjf.F .d 1 4e �" yea •vrt ' .y �, � „�„ h ,`. 'r+M[�{'_\F�y.. . 1 9�� }�� !u --,,� � aw uy,.._ _✓ 1(� +4. � `,y Kr" '/ Y I r. t'"' �Ix..0 t� � *fit �� .s µrR��'�� ♦ x�.i�..:. „' " i �r -`� y �, I�'M"��.. _.L�' '�GA� N . u: _'J'. � r. G.q QrfN�G�yN'}rP ,yds w''$ ,Y� .r •' r q��, v�. .yF) 1�/i''..I '�:, •* r� • „��• �z 1 +1'x' t`��'��.lr ti .i '�*' � ' .4. EL s - �5 yL��` - 04 p�-. s� V.:y, _ .f ami' 4. rP'Y''r � ltr .�'nT }'r� " .• � „ i"`X9�t;.� ti '1 r � L�.uEbN ?' { tiny 41t ` � ' .Y'e +'r12 ✓' � � uL �yr �I�. ,a'�' �r4, i' � .+'' "'' �„ t F ' '� A � h,. w 3i �'M1 � .i •� ��jJ .i1� � 1 f.. �' �s't-�' k '1 ! r I !' _ PI'j �ayw £ p. i n " ✓ � f i,! ',1(i 1J 'rr '' rtrvlt. '' • `.. + r� rL(" � '�}i��y y�vjy ''�.% � ✓. YJ' i�� F \„y�y�.�:,a+w � a`� ,?" p � J',,i8. 1%IJIilja�. t ' -'' 1MSd4 E "'` •nf".' rad r a /fJ./" /l ��'� rri' i � I" / r�r• ' �/y ;� d„, �;� nYsy,. •�v pJ/, . f,�r / rtt.i.. '�,k v�� l� ��i ,../�\ �✓..J� �, `4 r '"� f � 'qp�a��,/` { � '�, .r r 1 r��r�i'.J1�+'rf1� t a • '� q q V1. . wa '.1 "�. i ""�: r;J� � �� '•t Jf jo ! ri r}� lyt.Y i 1 t 1 Ijii „RZ',1' "`_ .r, : ' ' .. ti • �/ wW r ,f• ♦ §'91M 5 J r NNMM ( ry�t ( i ( ' pp r,YR 1 ,6wi+. „i"L ti •ti^r j '1 /.� �. ( � / �''fP{� ys C< !.r, y / .III i t �1f �,\ . � ,� .. f / wr��' -- ,r .--,+rt. , ,.,--•._..m - ::.,rv. =.r __ , • __ _-r__ _ *_ _.,, -.__ ..._ _. .-..-y,. ,.... -, --i, _ __ . :.. a - . __ - .- - _' ,... _ -T.. _- _ - __ _.,.- . .-.-. _-._•--___—_—_-_,_ -.. - __ _ __ _.____ _. _- -. _ ____- . . -_ _ _ _ __. _ - _. ____. MAP -6 :LOT' 13 „_ USINESS:PARKDEVELOPMENT BPI)*:- B S „ " REFERENCES, ,DEEDBOOK `7428, PAGE :105 °PLAN- BOOK41 `PLAN 15 w �. , . Za G 1 1) THIS PLAN IS NOT TO BE CONSIDERED AN ;ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY. 2 OWNERSHIP OF PARCEL-,SHOWN AS G. :- o o G F. M T N i SUBJECT O N DONALD S. E MER, 0 IS .,SUBJECT �. AN RT. A5E 0 N :' 240049 WHIC Hzt TO ,L DCOU . .C IS PENDING. .SAID CASE IS AN ACTION TO ;QUfET.11TLE. a P /\ Q ,OWNER. ,. , 0 5 , ` , .. . 1 . _,. . -J .. ... MOUNTAIN -R A TY'sTRUST � oUN E L _ . _ 8 ,.' USTEE TRUSTEE , . gH,RLEY HU H zo SALEM. MA ..01970 p p 60 1 Vr 15:120BINSON -'ROAD REALTY TRUST p C J Q�4 �J '� Z n _ I N :..TRUSTEE r\ ,FREDERICK .HUTCH NSO ti O � O 15 ROBINSON ROAD -SALEM, ,MA 01970 44D AAA .70' 5/ 8 • � , ENTERPRISES !� LROD S l 6 �t Rl GEND LE �. g 15 RO . . . . :` � �cr�'J 131NSON ROAD .._ SaIeM Massachusetts STONE WALL. 5 F -� ti r, ' �` L 3/4 �. 0 O I • •. SDH FD OR/LL'l/OLE P O �S 0 O LROD(S) � F o 5 ti • '' _. ;_--`k— PFEPAFED FM Ftl■—• : . /RON P/PE FOUND st 50 0.7 DIA. D IRON ROD SET WOOD PO ST CHAIN LINK FENCE(CL6 W SIGN - - FRED.. , , r 1 � (R, • : :.RECORD ti HUTCHINSON 4 t , , AREA=9.72 ACRES " . . . . C CALCULATED ' IN R ,. ECONDO (EXCLUDING THE FEE ROB/NSON 0 AD . O s MANUFACTURING. INC. ., 15 Robtnson Road , . F. . ., L.C.C. 11802-42) Salem, MassachusettsCO - G P� / / HAlCOC{ 1 bNC W BLOCK BUILDING�-. - ASSOC IP e i d O 4j M Cm Engineers o� 15 ROBINSON ROAD. r _ ; 1 REALTY TRUST D /2 DH(FD Land Surveyors . LROD S FREDERICK HUTCHINSON, TRUSTEE -c O ' 5, ROB/NSON ROAD 9 L.C.C. 3635-D Landscape Architects ? _ �0�• , AREA-10,222.47E ACRES: Environmental ,: r . '•,?1' , , , ,: '. ants COnslJlt t R . IODS , E o - _ R 185 CENTRE STREET DANVERS MA 01923 Nx , , •_,. , . , , _ ff �. o tJ VOICE 978 .777=3050 FAX 978 774-7816 , f C� �G WWW.HAN000KASSOCIATES.COM TORY 00 TON O , �, O � O. P r DWELL/ E PROPOSED p� R g Q G •A -71 -7 1/2 I i CovERALL P 0� p k�R BU/LD/NG 5 ' L��'1 I.ROD(S) rhOP P 5 ,. COR.'`STONE •� ; (0 VER EXISTING L h YP 6 1 E 25.5 CONC. FOUNDATION �, O ,�15 ) � L 1 0 V� r- o COPAD ETF / � do/ n CR "� 6 1,l CARMINE�. . 6 \X �°� �P RP ANGELO MONGIELLO OA COR.- CONC. R ; (L.C.C. 3635 D) POST RAIL p'1 f (TYP) FENCE � 0 •a 'b• 1 LPIPE(FD) 7 6 1 VER�iL UILD/NGG MMEEF 7 RO� h 1 PJM YYCJ 2 14 OS PENDING LC CASE _ 0 1 DATE 12 28/04 DRAWN BY. PJM f SCALE. 1 —50 CHECK BY. ,JMS p P D CK AD 0 }} i EXHIBIT PLAN .,. , _ ' DHF .. , . . , O �n <461 . . � „ OF LAND ,,....:, . ,. _. _.., • 20 61.05. C ' '. / 8.07 » _ < 51 9 I.ROD S 193.33 ` LROD S O IN SALEM MA . AINDUSTRIES AGGREGATE 7159 W >� ,. . : 111 DWG: 11476PP.dw . .,.. _ LAYOUT. Layoutt ., SCALE. 1 50 .., i SHEET. 1 OF 1 f low a . . ...... . ...:.:._:..... . ..•:-._... a: ,:..,.... , ,:: _ \ NO.:[7�7ROJ7ECT 114762000 50 100 PATH. fVaePe1�+ �\1 , �\a•9 P� LEGEND /' 107 �- �� PERMIT EXISTING PROPOSED / SITE PLAN MONITORING WELL - N/r \ l' SITEF O R PROPERTY LINE NOR ORE NNIS & SQUA�H CLUB,)/j(C. j r 9� POST AND RAIL FENCE 749 313,1 PL. 74 �OpLOT \ , r RETAINING WALL AND ROMP 15 Robinson Road SMP , � p � S � , SW�M0 ``�o EDGE OF GRAVEL OR DIRT ROAD — — —►� — �kFgM�\ N� +\ V_ tz- o D & D REALTY TRUST BU/LD/NG, LIGHT, STEPS & 01/ERHANG O / P.B. JIJ PL. 74 _STREAM �� LOCUS MAP SCALE. 1'=2000' Salem. Massachusetts 0 1970 92.6 SPOT ELEVA77ON 9.3..3 FG ----- 92--------- RELD SURVEYED ELEVA77ON CONTOUR 92 C,:) O / � /� /Al1�E&S� 32 - USGS ELEVA77ON CONTOUR / \\>>� PREPAFEDFOR• . . . 1N7ERU17TENT S7REAM OR BROOK / CAR STORAGE RS SD DR4/NL/NE SSD / �O RIPE AND WATER FZOW r N SP Engineering, STONE WALL EROSION CONTROL Inc // ` AIN S H BERM � �! �; LARGE � � �, CO, ��, �EY S 2• FORCE F S Q LIMIT OF 100-FOOT WERAND BUFFER ZONESTONE Q P 4 £ 45 Congress Street / Q �r \� O G�P� FH 30•' RCP Salem, Massachusetts 01970 ELEVA77ON BENCH MARK PILE / �, _ INV=43.1' IM=47.5' / N INV=43.0'(W) INV=43.1'(E) HANCOCK TOP, VERTICAL . ASSOCIATES / F7CC VENT PIPE I / TORgGE 8" PVC Q °< / Q, 58.9' . Civil Engineers /�� '�` - - - lA � ` I / � I SDS � 4$ DMH I Land Surveyors \- i A Landscape Architects � It5 ROBINSON R ,D REALTY ST 10TRU/ FREDER/CK HUT WNSON, E Environmental G `� / / �w/NSA' 0AD- Consultants JFP,oti' 3 a \ `� s P GG // O OP, VERT. T PIPE V' 108 8" PVC 185 CENTRE STREET, DANVERS, MA 01923 VOICE (978) 777-3050, FAX (978) 774-7816 -66.5' WWW.HAN000KASSOCIATES.COM STONE 7 / OIL & , — i 24"X36" j LUBRICANT �g6 4' �� i ►l GRATE NV=67.2 AO \ _n STORAGE HO \ / _ — — .w - - - .w. _ — . 'OFLOOD — E � ° > 15" STONE acres. INV=71.5' / 2 sroar DRIVEWAY SWA - 4>_ SGP�E `� � - a \'1 AroNE — — — �'" - -92-SPTIC SYSTEM -, WELL 90_ ELL ,M �� R E 2 1�� 1�,�'o I 1' Ti OLIN TE o otiT� Otis ibo '_ 1 4" IRON 9iy � �o�qs ,bosT & RAic c FENCE Q� R TIRE �2v"Qsv / V Y�\ PILE META o �\ O�" Q`t ' ��\0`N sTop Ice", s -� 0' I � � P 9cF / UN 1 ,1b /% ` , ��m� 0 STORAGE F, (1 , I i �Q 36v E� l��.1\ak) N0. BY APP DATE ISSUE/REVISION DESCRIPTION E l Q�QSo / ATO q G� DE pPM / � \N � .Rl VN DATE: 02 OS 2007 SIGN BY: JC °'�-� ONl SCALE: AS SHOWN DRAWN BY: JC OltV �\ est ---- - O 90 1 Q Pp PP CHECK BY: VVT Pg � 0� .♦ \� ♦ � ■ 2' BERM ♦ ASSESSED TO.' IJ\� ��P� • • OIL SEPAPIOR� #1 CITY M Or (L OT 'A lG CITY OF SALEM ' NEIL'— W , AN BOOK 41, PLAN 15 A GREGA TE INDUSTRIES CONSERVA TION RESTRICTION GAF . ' SITE PLAN L.C.C. 7159-B DEED BOOK 6740, PAGE 162 18"RCP DEED BOOK 731.3, PAGE 15 0 INV=78.S' DEED BOOK 7382, PAGE 126 NOTE: STRUCTURES TO BE DESIGNED BY APPROVAL.s AND SUBMITTED FOR - ELEVATION BENCH MARKS PLOT DATE: Fee os, 2002 10:39 .,. \... „ DATUM: PATH: F:\L.nd Pmject. R2\13287\dw\ NO. DESCRIPTION ELEV. DWG: 13287PrWs.dwg 1. 15" MAPLE CUT SPIKE SET 1 85.23 LAYOUT: SITE PIS�1 0 25 50 100 200 SHEET: 1 OF 4 GRAPHIC SCALE: 1 INCH = 50 FEET �' PROJECT NO.: 13287 `\ PERMIT -,� - N11" ,\ ,,% SITE PLAN NOR ORE TF�NNIS & So UA CLUB, l C. 1 11101C.C.L11802-D / F O R �9. 313, PL. 74 j' - 15 Robinson Road D & D REAL TY TRUST S " P.B. 313, PL. 74 _STREAM Salem, Massachusetts O 1970 TRI0I, r 1 / CAR STORAGE RS \ / 0 PP1�ARr=D FOR / 9 00 \` N y� $� SP Engineering, 1 ` FORCE AIN S ' Inc. LARGE I� � `J "O 5' P\,!� � � 2" v 1 \ STONE ; / P�O�� P�-J ° FH L 7.53 30" RCP 45 Congress Street PILE , \ / O �� c� c`Y SD INV=43.1' Salem, Massachusetts 01970 / 9� IM=47.5' INV-- 43.0' W) ut / INV=43.1'(E) � ---------- __ �� S° HANCOCK - / F� uCi ' TOP, VERTICAL I :z QZ p VENT PIPE ASSOCIATES 2 ORA q 8" PVC v r GE 58.9' Q h C) o / �`' _ _ - _ - - --- - / s° Civil Engineers - DMH s° �. I Land Surveyors Gi 5 ROBINSON R D REALTY ST 1 Landscape Architects FREDERICK HUTCIINSON, TRU E X01D'9/NSLYV OA Environmental Consultants �\ �Q C'. / O / s8 PP CRT. T PIPE (3 / 108 75.00 5.1' H (j / .'�=�� 7• a.ot 185 CENTRE STREET, DANVERS, MA 01923 7 1 -66.5' RPVELibbb�' a 1.s VOICE (978) 777-3050, FAX (978) 774-7816 \ (`v // , ,. - -�•4Y G 7a 9 not 24QX « 7 WWW.HAN000KASSOCIATES.COM V \ NEW OIL & 91 �'6f'� i /i7 a •7&62 l •77 54 AL B INV=67.2' / LUBRICANT ` 15Ar � 78.561 . y 71.14 GRAT STORAGE /0 79.879.30 79.7 �?�3a 3.15 FLOOD �`�\EeB ,4' , �.� 15" STONE J't --X11-- _- M► _ � ° 76.40 v ^_eN / a 85/ �1 76.08 INV=71.6 J, o r� Lllal"I"P �� •r - r996a • / 77.96 e / DRIVEWAY 87.4s� O/79 73J .� \�G vnc�nv ^rt 2 S1ORY 94.43 3 .93/6 j�7'i'0 \,�� C71 I 7ALACKO �, �. / 41b' _ 92. V/ f r F-�D.a,`8p 95 5-OS i / i .IM 79.98 �C� \. Dµ£L[ �-r- - - - - '�"\` _90 \ °\ 8093 � � ��/80.41 / 3 P ° STONE CULVER y� / SEPTIC WELL `=w�. ____ \ \ \ \ �-+�°� 79.81 O �• __`` � !vL (ANAYLSIS POIN 3) / SYSTEM `r WELL W �9°s \v��G\� r- 5 84.80 \ - - 6- - - - - - - I " PVC CAP 80.46 eo a9 /�6 RO Q / O 93.87 \ _ -84- - - - - - _ 1` ®80-a6 ••81.27 • f 6 �! / .82.99 J•81.63 8121 7E 79.95 G, a., 81.�8z� '842 eF V. - 7C ` CA994. 9Ib P `_tel \ / + .47 /111 I I Im az s,i8a 6 az. 4E i \_ IRLri / I I III I �9 «/� -r 1�� + %`POST & RAIL 98.71.1/)1 11 1 I 1WE W/t�/ v TIRE �� FE CE j 1��1•al.43 I , If \`1 \ META U O / 9` �43PILE ROOF Obp \84.3;< \m\ N \ / ! ✓ Ra \ l •83.42 (r55.001 �. NO. BY APP DATE ISSUE/REVISION DESCRIP11ON 5 II c0�5P�'`�5 ✓ \ % f9 1 5"9 / SCALE: 02AS SHOWN DRAWN BY: JC 9a.4, 5 G J • I 82.0 1 l U m e 1 CHECK BY: VVT ASSESSED 70.• O -=/x`•78.96 .OB 7 .87 \ CITY M 3 80:55 oz39 \ (LOT 'A � >� �c CI TY OF SALEM WELL W/ s3 AN BOOK 41, PLAN 15 AGGREGA TE INDUSTRIES CONSERVA TION RESTRIC77ON 2" CAP gay EX�NG L.C.C. 7159-B DEED BOOK 6740, PAGE 162 18"RCP AL DEED BOOK 7313, PAGE 15 INV=78.5' WATERSHED MAP DEED BOOK 7382, PAGE 126 , POND \ (ANAYLSIS POINT 1) Fee 04\ PLOT DATE: F2007 9:27 em PATH: F\Lend Project R2\13287\E«9\ 1 / 't" rw. _ i DWG: 13287ExWs.dwg LAYOUT: SITE PS_ 2 0 25 50 ' 100 200 / SHEET: 2 OF 4 PROJECT NO.: 13287 GRAPHIC SCALE: 1 INCH = 50 FEET \ � . / PERMIT Q N/f" SITE PLAN NOR ORE jKNNIS & SOUA� CLUB, l C. i LC.C. 11802-D , / FOR � 798. 313, PL 74 — 15 Robinson Road AI D & D REALTY TRUST S " _ 7 P.B. 313, PL 74 _ TRSEAM ��Qa — � \ � \ � � � � � . `y ` Salem, Massachusetts 01970 CAR STORAGE RS A / O PF�ARID FOR / \\ a�/ � � �r SP Engineering, �i ! E 1 � `� S H Inc. FORCE AIN s LARGE 2" STONE \ / P�,O�OF P � F o FH c 30" RCP 45 Congress Street PILE \ / �� cA �� INV=43.1' Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Q \ JAW 0 M=47.5' / \ INV=43.0' W) INV=43.1'�E) / o - -- � \ p HANCOCK TOP, VERTICAL I VENT PIPE o ASSOCIATES TpRApE 8" PVC 58.9' Q � SD � Civil Engineers DMH Land Surveyors 5 ROBINSON R D REALTY ST 1 FREDERICK HUT INSON, TRU E Landscape Architects Environmental L C.C 36311NR rp Consultants 40 OP, VERT. T PIPE Q 8" PVC O /' 108 T 5'1185 CENTRE STREET, DANVERS, MA 01923 -66.5' VOICE (978) 777-3050, FAX (978) 774-7816 STONE WWW.HAN000KASSOCIATES.COM 24"X36" OIL & - --^R — �/ �► METAL INV=67.2' LUBRICANT SII ,B A'2 f „ !GPAT \ STORAGE— NO1l c�°p1E ��o y ` 15" STONE _— INV=71.6'2 STOP Y, DRIVEWAY SWP�E ' G ~ vncLAv j 7ALACKCI _d7-ONE- _ _ F _ - ; �0��P�' Q STONE CULVER ;/� 4026 1 SEPTIC WELL t=- -90-- _ ` RPM �2 VIP �0 ° \w`(( Gc��. (ANAYLSIS POIN 3) I SYSTEM �Ik- — — - WF 51"%F -- z 2 G 36 o kj All sogl \ cp l!lgOO Scq ��s / II aFP°� �a � < IRON 01 1WOST RRAIL OFENCE ?(v CF _ TIRE B -TA O 4jj PILE MEp,s>TpP ROOF BFSO r.�I SEL rQ0.C� 15 TAGE Q\QF.9 - 1T ATO P►� ( 11 / Q�Q \NN�E Q� ` z / - r -- - �_ U l ; N0. 8Y APP DATE ISSUE/REVISION DESCRIPTION r 7 l ♦♦♦� Q ��S SD ----- /05/2007 1 DESIGN BY: ic 0,0. - �� O l / p P11? SCALE:dt" DATE: 02AS SHOWN DRAWN BY: JC 5"( GD ♦♦ `O /♦� ■ . ■ ■ {_____ _ 27 BERM R�QEtP CHECK BY: VVT ♦ / ♦ ASSESSED TO.- 1-61 OIL SEPAF /JR�I -�\ CITY M ' _n ( OT , 10 CITY OF SALEM WELL W/ 8pi i AN BOOK 41, PLAN 15 , AGGREGA IF INDUSTRIES CONSERVA TION RESTRIC77ON 2" CAP )POSED L.CC. 7159-B DEED BOOK 6740, PAGE 162 18"RCP il� /' DEED BOOK 7313INV=78.5' , PAGE 15 —" WATERSHED MAP DEED BOOK 7362, PAGE 126 il � POND (ANAYLSIS POINT 1) PLOT DATE: Fab 0a. 2007 10:27 un PAm F:\Lwd PoJ.I R2V7787\d"9\ / DWG: 13287PrWs.dwg / LAYOUT: WSPROPOf3S�3 0 25 50 100 ' 200 SHEET: 3 OF 4 PROJECT NO.: 13287 GRAPHIC SCALE: 1 INCH = 50 FEET GENERAL NOTES PERMIT 4' OF 3/4" - 1 1/2" CRUSHED 1. LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UAL/AES/OBSTRUCTIONS/SYSTEMS SHOWN HEREON ARE SITE PLAN STONE APPROMMATF ONLY. ALL UTILITIES/OBS7RUCAONS/SYS7EMS MAY NOT BE SHOWN. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCA ANG AND PROTECTING ALL UNDERGROUND U77U77ES/OBSTRUCTIONSISYS•7EMS, T EMBANKMENT WHETHER OR NOT SHOWN HEREON. FOR TOP = if KEY ;AYIf2.02.3 Y DUMPED STONE PER MHO 2. UNLESS 07HERWISE SHOWN, ALL NEW UTILITIES SHALL BE UNDERGROUND. ND EMERGENCY SPILL AY AND �/�~ POND LINER 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL FURN/SH CONS7RUCAON LAYt7UT OF BU/LD/NG AND S/lF IMPROVFMEN75 171/S Wt7RK15 Robinson Road EL. 82.0 D/MENT POND SPILLWAY ONLY. SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR. 4" COMPACTED EL. 81.5 2 DEPTH LOAM k SEED —� 1 DETENTION BASIN 4. SAFETY MEASURES, CONS7RUCAON METHODS AND CON7ROL OF HVRK SHALL BE RESPONSIBILITY � OF CONTRACTOR. TOE OF 3 SEE TABLE FOR GRADE EL 78.0 7/N ON S/7F SOILS OR SAND Salem, Massachusetts 01970 EMBANKMENT 1 EMBANKMENT EXiS77NG 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REPAIR AND/OR REPLACEMENT OF ANY EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS MA7ER/ALS IMPERVIOUS DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION )NAT ARE NOT DES/GNA7FD FOR DEMOL/TION AND / OR REMOVAL CORE HEREON. DAMAGED IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE REPAIRED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THEIR RESPECTIVE OWNERS EXCAVATF KEY 2' MIN BELOW 6. THIS PLAN /S NOT INTENDED TO SHOW AN ENGINEERED BU/LD/NG FOUNDATION DESIGN, W1/ICH STRIP & STOCKPILE TOP 1.5' 8' WIDE KEY SUBGRADE [1J PR/OR M LINER INSTALLATION ALL ROCKS 3" OR LARGER Wt7ULD INCLUDE DETAILS AND FINAL ELEVATIONS OF FOOTINGS, WALLS AND SUBSURFACE (SUBGRADE = EX/SANG SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SUBGRADE. DRAINAGE TO PREVENT INTER/OR FLOOD/NG. SEE ARCH/7FC7URAL AND/OR S7RUC7URAL DRAWINGS GRADE-1.5) [21 7HE POND LINER SHALL BE 40 mil HDPE W11H HEAT HELDED PIREPAFED FOR. EMBANKMENT MA TERIALS SEAMS 7. ANY INTENDED RENS/ON OF THE HORIZONTAL AND/OR VERTICAL LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENTS TO BE CONSTRUCTED AS SHOWN HEREON SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY ENG/NEER PR/OR COMPACTION TO IMPLEMENTATION. MAX PARTICLE LOOSE LIFT REQUIREMENT SP Engineering, j LOCATION MA7ER/AL SIZE (IN) THICKNESS (/N) (X MOD [1]) 8. RIM EZEVA77ONS SHOWN FOR NEW STRUCTURES ARE APPROXIMATE AND ARE PRONDED 70 ASSIST CONTRACTOR WITH MA7FR/AL TAKEOFTS f7N/SH RIM ELEVATIONS SHOULD MATCH PAVEXIENT, GRADING NATIVE PARENT KEY SOIL [2J 6 12 MAX 92[J] DETENTION POND LINER _ OR LANDSCAP/NG, UNLESS SPEC/f7CALLY INDICATED OTHERWISE. Inc. NA AVE PARENT 6 12 MAX 92[J] TYPICAL CROSS SEC77ON 9. WHERE EX/SANG UTILITY LINES STRUCTURES ARE TO BE CUT/BROKEN DOWN/ABANDONED, ONES/STRUCTURES 4 n EMBANKMENT SOIL [2I NOT TO SCALE SHALL BE PLUGGED/CAPPED/�LLED /N ACCORDANCE WITH OWNER REQU/REMEN75 $ Congress Street Salem Massachusetts 01970 80 LOAM COVER NATIVE TOPSOIL 1 B MIN 12. THE CON7RA010R SHALL VER/FY THE LOCATION AND REZAAVF ELEVATION OF BENCH MARKS PR/OR TO IMPERVIOUS CORE SOIL W17H A T LEAST 6 12 MAX 92[J] COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE REPORTED TO INE ENG/NEER. 30X CLAY AND 13. PROPOSED BUILD/NG FOUNDATION CONFIGURATION AND LOCATION ON THE LOT AS SHOWN ARE CONCEP7UAL SILT CONTENT AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AS 70 CONFORMANCE W77H f7NAL ARCH/7ECAIRAL PLANS AND ZONING ORDINANCES PR/OR TO CONSTRUCTION. [1] MDD. MAX/MUM DRY DENSITY. 14. SILT FENCE AND/OR HAYBALES SHOWN HEREON SHALL BE INSTALLED BEFORE EARTH D/S7URBANCE OCCURS W17N/N HANCO CK [2]ACCEPTABLE 70 ENG/NEER. BUFFER ZONE, AND SHALL SERVE AS THE LIMIT OF Wt7RK. [3] COMPACT TO TEST AVERAGE OF 92X, NO TEST LESS THAN 909 15. SOME CON70UR ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE fROM USGS MAPPING AND ARE APPROXIMATE ASSOCIATES 16. RIP RAP BETWEEN FOREBAY AND THE DETENTION POND SHALL BE 4' TO 6" DIAMETER S70NE. DETENTION POND EMBANKMENT TYPICAL CROSS SEC770N NOT TO SCALE NOT Engineers REGULA TORY NOTES Land Surveyors 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT DIG-SAFE FOR UNDERGROUND UTILITY MARK/NG AT 1-888-344-7233 Landscape Architects 5REINFORC& AT LEAST 72 HOURS PR/OR 70 COMMENCEMENT OF ANY Wt7RK.L ' 2. CONTRAC70R SHALL MAKE H/MSEZF AWARE OF ALL CONSIRUCTON REOU/REMENT3; CONDITIONS,AND LIMITATIONS IMPOSED BY PERM/TS AND APPROVALS ISSUED BY REGULATORY AUTHOR/TIESEnvironmental PRIOR 70 COMMENCEMENT OF ANY Wt7RK. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORD/NA TF AND OBTA/N ALL Consultants PRECCONSTRUCTION PERM/TS REQU/RED BY REGULATORY AUTHOR/TIES.CONCJ. ALL WORK OU737DE OF BU/LD/NG 7HAT IS LESS THAN 10 FEET FROM THE /NS/DE FACE OF BU/LD/NG SECTION FOUNDATIONS SHALL CONFORM Hf TY 7HE UNIFORM STA 7E PLUMBING CODE OF MASSACHUSETTS; 185 CENTRE STREET, DANVERS, MA 01923 248 CMR 2.00 VOICE (978) 777-3050, FAX (978) 774-7816 WWW.HAN000KASSOCIATES.COM PLAN \> F7N/SH GRADE KID STOPPER SEE DETAIL 6M/N. DRY DUMPED STONE R/PRAP r fL0/4' PER MHD M2.02.3 �4 A .� ,,in�vt. •ANG 2 REBARS OR W1�OOEN STAKE 6' DIA. PLAN INTENT.• �R�0z6 N • �• ••- • , DRIVEN MIN. 6 INTO GROUND • .• • THE PURPOSE OF THESE PLANS IS TO SHOW THE DESIGN OF A STORMWATER C TED• �•• MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. THESE PLANS ARE NOT INTENDED TO ADDRESS ISSUES ANGLE FIRST STAKAVPEAZC AB R/PRAP OUTLET APRON z " + I RELATED TO HAZARDOUS WASTE REMOVAL. TOWARDS I Z o PREWOUSL Y LAID I I;; BALE + I SEC 11A'► DRAIN OUTLET AND R/PRAP APRON r I 11 •�F y BUTT TENDS OGETHER TYPICAL CROSS SECT/ON u NOT TO SCALE S7RAI W OR HA Y BALE ISOMETRIC KEW EMBED BALE N0. BY APP DATE ISSUE/REVISION DESCRIPTION w 4' DEEP DATE: 02/05/2007' 2 05 2007 IDESIGN BY: JC SCALE: AS SHOWN DRAWN BY: JC CROSS SEC ICHECK BY: VVT HA YBALE BARB/ER 4=6" O/A. STONE Ry/SH NOT TO SCALE CHECK DAMS GRADE 12' MIN. 3D OC 6' NOTES AND , ��i2�/�~yam 3 DETAILS 2' M/N. SOD OVERCy�`%�`iTY.�YTvh��T`ih�iT%`�/ 4' MIN. LOAM 8'-0' MAX. PLOT DATE Feb 05. 2007 10.39 am GRASS DRAINAGE SWALE PAIR: F:\Lana Pm*t• R2\13287\dn\ NOT TO SCALE DWG: 13287PFWs.dwg LAYOUT: DETAILS 0 .5 1 2 4 PIS 4 SHEET: 4 OF 4 GRAPHIC SCALE: 1 INCH = 1 INCH PROJECT NO.: 13287 MH ASSESSORS Rim 66.7 Y MAP 6, LOT 13 ZONING F"k� •:�� fo; � : L BPD"- BUSINESS PARK DEVELOMENTiu } REFERENCES= DEED BOOK 7428, PAGE 105P rt g inr PLAN BOOK 41 , PLAN 15 L.L.C. 3635-D NORTH SHORE TENNIS & SQUASH NOTES 2 d dr QI '•� y .s- IeQN i ✓ b ja �'r I. THIS PLAN IS NOT TO BE CONSIDERED AN ALTA/AGSM LAND TITLE SURVEY. CpLUB INC. ( LLC 11002-D ) 2. OWNERSHIP OF PARCEL SHOWN AS (PLAN BOOK 313, PLAN 74) N/F DONALD S. EMMERTON IS SUBJECT v r . . -� �;k r,, � �� Swamtk' oma: T., ._r •-. TO LAND COURT CASE N2 240049 WHICH IS PENDING. SAID CASE IS AN ACTION TO • f �� t � QUIET TITLE. r '° .n a pn)d rn nJ�,A ,/ •moi e."'• �a ° e` � RECORD OWNER: � � -� � r J ' r D a D REALTY TRUST r MOUNTAIN REALTY TRUST ( PLAN BOOK 313, PLAN 74 ) 15 ROBINSON ROAD 17 SALEM, MA 01970 LOT I MH / °t "0 Rim 54.12 _ n SITE LOCUS Trailers I r Test Pit 12" LEGEND Car Storage Cara Water TP-101 01�\ 8 Water Main BM xlQ- \l 48.8 STONE WALL Fi -1 �, Force Large 5. �� Main MH BM 61 Stone Stone O�P�� y,.d c° Rim 47.81 — ECONDO ire Pile �`�� `5 y 1 28" Concrete Culvert Top of pipe 45.44 MANUFACTURING, INC. — — ( LLC 11802 -42 ) O e- WoterSD — — Inv.43.11 A O TP-104 , Rim47.57 Q\Q�o TP-103 �a 0 Fill Storage Stone Crusher \c� Rim 4 4.08 e� / eo ( 15 ROBINSON ROAD REALTY TRUST f / FREDERICK HUTCHINSON, TRUSTEE ROBINSON ROAD 1O6 p0 BUFFER ZONE / ( LLC 3635 - D ) �-- —� . . O*O \ 10 3 81•'12 -� / 3 Berm Stone Culvert 97 D �W� Inv. 67.41 New Oil and Lubricants X60 ` Exist. Stream �/ Top 71.58 Storage 175 1 94 • `. USE 3 Berm / \ 91 88 HO Existing Stream Wel Velocit Baer Int 72.3 gCp�E n 95.91 � Vd � / 03 Septic 2 tory wood and, / Sxstem Ns 15 stone dwelling ` Forebay Batteries Concrete I IOO- �_ M -2 Car Stripping O Pad L -1 � ` 3% lap" / CARMINE Bt ANGELO MONGIELLO Hazardous Waste and 2 Berm ta55 5/_ / `est ( LLC 3635 - D ) Spill Control Gear G d I ) Pile \ 4"I o post �\ 6` �ercn Waste Oil and Fluilds \06 x'000 rail fence \ f 1 MW Containment Areo / �� p / ® S E quipment O / / / 00 C)�\1 It 1 u-1 N O Storage '• \�� >(�l d erg 000 Roo �` `� Z �' / 2 9-13-06 REMOVED REPLICATED STREAM X \- 0 0 Paddock m Z 0 1 7-14-06 RELOCATED STREAM JEA wetlands BM LinerOTP- 102 j Infiltrator �\ o • / - I TRANSECT 2 at 40� REV. DATE DESCRIPTION BY n A > 1 0 • C�� / a \> Under I � / 1 / A & H Auto Exchange L Storage _ _ I— — — — ► Foreba 15 Robinson Road, Salem , MA oo°b/ 12' Berm --ooC? POND N° I ea o • — 30'x 130 M0 A CB.ttom 78.16 SITE PLAN FOR NOI Oi I Separator . • ' Bottom M -4 Manhole �— AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES i g . - 96.36 93.55 100 BOFFERZONE ( LLC 7159- B ) Existing Overflow 80.20 Bridge , Inv. 78.42 ENGINEERING • TECHNOLOGY 0 c! Dry Stream /� SCALE: I"= 50 29 Congress street • Salem, MA 01970 • Telephone: (617) 745-4569 POND I Nature Path DESIGN BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY DATE PROJECT N0. SHEET NO. Water 79.51 0 50 100 20o BMP ETA Apr.'o6 I of 4 110 FLUIDS CONTAINME14T BERM STRUCTURE AND IMPERVIOUS WORK AREA TRAILERS OIL SEPARATOR GROUNDWATER RECHARGERS TRAILE 109 MANHOLE TWO ( 2) AT 40 ' — LYNNPAC / \\� . //= AND STONE GEOTEXTILE MAT _ 00 00\ oD I I!2" T03" STONE 0O 108 \�_ "d db `\\ 0 0 _ oGEOTEXTILE MA T 6 "SDR 35 40 MlDo Od 0000 6)6 OL -- o?j OVERFLOW pE 0 o bdid np0 STANDPIPE GEOS .3 03STONE 60TH p Go066oa C) 107 SIpEE S 6PERF. PIPE INV. 107.00 ° ODoodU / / / - 36C SDR 35 106.50 as __- -T / b0) 00 OUD 1 — 00 00 106 p UObb I 60 — o ID o 66�dOj I / / / / _ as p 6 0 w 105 105.00 0812 � 0 0 0 0 U_ 000cb000,000500o :boo 0QUo�� c o I FOREBAY p 6" PERFORATED PVC III 104 J W 103 STEEL SURFACE I BAFFLE CONCRETE V- NOTCH WEIR AT 102.00 1020 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360 380 400 440 460 480 500 520 540 580 600 620 640 660 DISTANCE - FEET 1 IOIL LOGO ' 101 TRANSECT A I SCALE : 1'' =20 ' HORIZONTAL I O I° = 1 ' VERTICAL 100 I T I POND N° I LARGE 00 99 RIPRAP I I 86 00 0 00 ROAD 98 � � � C) 00 85 0 O 06° SDR 35 I 00 DRAIN I 97 �— 84 NEW BERM AROUND POND AND FOREBAY � 1 � EXISTING GRADE STEEL SURFACE \ VELOCITY D BAFFLE \ �O BROOK AT 28.00 BARRIER O �8 FOREBAY CONCRETE V- NOTCH 96 -F WEIR AT 83.00 ~- 83 w IIDDoJO00 N \ \ oOSo° GRASSY SWAE BE o00 /� eDL fn 0 i / < oo � 82 � � X O0c)Qo 0 00 X X > 0Do �oo'o O OOD 6°SDR 35 FROM XGRASSY SWA E w �lJ��QO� CJV O 00 81 — w OIL LOG 00 O O O RIP RAP POND N° 2 DOD 80 fl 00 REV. DATE DESCRIPTION BY 6"SDR 35 DRAIN C/ re D 00 A & H Auto Exchange 79 790 O 15 Robinson Road , Salem , MA OD - BROOK AT 77.0 TRANSECTS FOR N01 78 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 f 0 DISTANCE - FEET � [PENGINEERING • TECHNOLOGY TRANSECT B 29 Congress Street Salem, MA 01970 • Telephone: (617) 745-4569 DESIGN BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY DATE PROJECT N0. SHEET NO. SCALE : 1" = 20' HORIZ . 7 1 " = 1 ' VERT. BMP JETA 7- 061 2of 3