Loading...
64-0152 - 4 TECHNOLOGY WAY - CONSERVATION COMMISSION O "by 01,5t — l4,hend Ora¢q a'F �onc�,{rNiS {, Mn� ov2l� I Cell 4 q38-430-8tq� Bruce Pooley P.E I I FAFARD REAL ESTATE AND DEVELOPMENT CORP. ® ' ` 290 ELIOT STREET ASHLAND MASSACHUSETTS 01721 TEL. (508) 881-1600 FAX (508) 875-8610 Residential Sales (508)881-6662 Commercial Sales/Leasing (508)881-1512 April 22 , 1994 Salem Conservation Commission One Salem Green Salem , MA 01970 Attention : Betsy Horne , Chairperson RE : DEP 64-152 DEP 64-153. DEP 64-178 Dear Ms . Horne : We would like to respectfully request a further extension of time for the completion of the environmental work on our Salem property . The work involved will enable us to get the Commission all of the information it has requested prior to 4 making a determination on our request for extension of the above orders of conditions . As you know , we previously provided you with correspondence from our licensed site consultants , Sanborn Environmental Consultants dated February 22 , 1994 . The letter stated that testing could not commence until permitted by warmer weather in the spring . Personnel of Sanborn will be on site Tuesday May 3 , 1994 and testing will take approximately eight weeks from that date . We would therefore like to respectfully request an extension to July 24 , 1994 . —" We have hired appropriate licensed site professionals to bring this matter to a conclusion . We want to make certain that they have the time necessary to do a thorough analysis of the site so that we may finally resolve this matter with DEP and with your Commission . Thank you for your consideration of our request . Very truly yours , nr ice Hannert nning & Land Use Coordinator Certified Mail P 007 793 578 file : 64-152 A a) Realty Trust ■ PO Box 2027 • Salem MA 01970-6227 . 701-593-6006 - July 7, 2004 Conservation Commission U L U 7 2��� City Of Salem 120 Washington St &T0FPV "`Ar%17' Salem, MA 01970 re: 4 Technology Way Dear Commission Members, We are the holders of the property at 56 Swampscott Road, Salem MA(Map 7 lot 64), that abuts along a line, the applicants property at 4 Technology Way, currently under permit review. We have some issues concerning the property located at 4 Technology Way and we have decided to bring these issues forward now. During Farfard's clearing& grading of the industrial park, they had brought the buildable portion of their property, to the same elevation as the rear of our property(see Photo 1). We understand, for your reasons, you required that water run off from 4 Technology Way be routed through the storm drain system at Technology Way. We concur as we do not want their water run off entering our property either. We assume that is why Fart'ard had then raised the topography of their lot. They did so by delivering a large amount of soil and spreading it out over their property in order to grade their topography to a considerably higher elevation where their property abuts ours. You may not be aware that, in doing so, Farfard had spread some of this soil over the stone boundary that had remained after their first grading(see Photo 2). This stone boundary, now covered, had continued along the same line as a fieldstone boundary that delimits their property from ours. We state that, we reserve the right that if and when alterations are to be made to our topography, they would be in a manner acceptable to us and at a time of our choosing. We are displeased that Farfard had altered this, though small, portion our topography, regardless of their intentions in this act. Second, since Farfard had raised their topography above ours, no retaining wall had been placed against the edge of this higher elevation of soil (see Photo 2 again)which is technically required. Without a wall In place, their soil will spread further onto our property from the compressing and squeezing out of the soil caused by the motion of construction equipment during future construction, and from the continuous changing weight distribution of the future parking lot along that edge, and also from weathering against that open edge. All of the above will result in an erosion and a lessening of the current slope of the grade along this edge of their property, which may also be of concern to you. A&PMTTERSV.727 Ultimately we seek correction of these conditions as follows: 1) The removal of the soil that currently extends onto our property. 2) The construction of a wall, on their property, to retain their soil. We would assume that customarily, the seller being the cause of, would be responsible for, regardless of any potential buyer, and in this situation, the most skilled and able to make these corrections; would offer to make these corrections prior to the property's sale, so as not to hinder a buyer's efforts. Though now that the seller and buyer are under agreement, they could re-negotiate their terms to include these corrections, we hope, amicably, and swiftly, if they have not already done so. So, for the present: We ask that the buyer& seller determine which party will be responsible to make these corrections. We ask for the party assuming these corrections to provide us with a written agreement stating that the corrections will be made within two years, or prior to further development, whichever occurs first; in lieu of immediate correction. We ask for the City Of Salem to attach a proviso onto the building permit requiring that these corrections are to be made prior to further development, and that they provide us with the written agreement to correct, stated above. We pray that the City Of Salem will consider our requests and concur with us. Sincerely, George J. Corso, Managing Trustee cc: City Of Salem Planning Board, 120 Washington St, Salem MA 01970 RBMBUTTER97-717 §pf. , t S ' rTik a-TE;,, t •p1.t-. r _ j '�� t'� N �� \ - _. {� .tet• _ Photo 1theboundarybetween1 ' 64 1theproperty Technology 1 1 y . r Y,s is M ar � r rlY�"• ?�. �3 r j Photo 2. View of the boundary between Lot 64 (lett), and the property at 4 Technology Way (right), after raising the topography of 4 Technology Way. A&MBUTTEas17-727 P)ENGINEERING • TECHNOLOGY P.O. Box 848•Salem, Massachusetts 01970•Telephone: 978-745-4569•Fax: 978-745-4881 July 22, 2004 Chairman All. 2 2 2004 I Conservation Commission •�--.--• i 120 Washington Street Salem, MA 01970 Re: 4 Technolosy Way,Atlantic Paving Co. Dear Chairman; I have prepared this Stormwater Management Plan and drawings on behalf of Atlantic Paving Co. for their proposed development at 4 Technology Way, in accordance with the DEP "Best Management Practices" and the Wetlands Protection Act. Please add this submittal to the clients application for an amendment to the Order of Conditions dated September 8, 1988, DEP file#64-152. Discussions with the city engineer and staff last week determined that there wasn't suitable capacity in the Swampscott Road street drainage for this project. Although they said we could tie into the Technology Way system, the pipe enters the marsh 30' from the property. Which would cause increased flows and erosion. Therefore, a Stormwater Management Plan is proposed that consists of the following; • The parking area around the building shall be completely paved with a minimum 4" bituminous curb. • Roof drainage shall be tied separately to the oil/grit separator. • Deep sump catch basins will be used to pretreat and convey runoff to the separator, • All runoff shall pass through a 2000 gallon oil separator with oil absorbant logs. • The pretreated runoff will flow into a large rock forebay to remove sediment and level flow. • .An infiltration pond will be connected to the forebay to provide solids removal, groundwater recharge and slow release to the wetlands. --S Chairman Conservation Commission July 22;2004 Page 2 • Temporary control measures and a detention pond will be constructed to capture runoff during construction. • Water quality monitoring of the discharge, retained stormwater and the monitoring well's#1, 2 and 3 will be conducted to demonstrate compliance. • A regular inspection and maintenance program will be implemented to protect the resource. The plan and design has been prepared using standard engineering principles, the HydroCad computer modeling system and DEP BMP guidelines. Please call if you have any questions. Very truly yours, SP Engineering, Inc. Bruce M. Poole President BMP/sm i3. CITY OF SALEM ' CONSERVATION COMMISSION September 27, 2007 Stephen P. Lovely 14 Story Street Salem,MA 01970 Re: Request for an Extension—DEP#64-152 4 Technology Way,Salem, MA 01970 Dear Mr. Lovely: At the regularly scheduled Conservation Commission meeting on September 13, 2007, the Commission reviewed your letter dated September 7, 2007 requesting an extension to the existing Amended Order of Conditions dated September 9, 2004. The Commission voted to deny the project since no work has been done on the property within the past three years. Prior to any work occurring on the site a new Notice of Intent will have to be filed. If you have any further questions,please feel free to contact me 978-619-5685. Sincerely, Carey es Conservation Agent/Staff Planner CC: DEP Northeast Regional Office RECEIVE® SEP 1 0 2007 Stephen P. Lovely, Attorney at Law DEPT.OF PLANNING& 14 Story Street COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Salem, Massachusetts 01970-2820 Telephone 978-745-8274 Fax 978-74-9525 Kevin Cornacchio Chairman Salem Conservation Commission 120 Washington Street Salem, MA 01970 RE: Norman Dube Technology Way September 7, 2007 Dear Chairman Cornacchio: This office represents Norman Dube in the matter of the Amended Order of Conditions (DEP FILE# 64-152) granted by the Commission on September 9, 2004. As a result of concerns of the Planning Board my client has not yet proceeded on the project as approved by the Conservation Commission. At this time my client respectfully asks that the Amended Order of Conditions be extended for a period of three years. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerly Stephe . L vely, Esq. Cc Norman Dube file Ik BENCHMARKENGINEERING CORP. P/annmg Engineering and Surveymg 296 Eliot Street Telephone: 508 881-0601 Ashland,Massachusetts 01721 Facsimile 508 881-0625 Mr. Donald Cefalo Salem Conservation Commission 122 Washington Street Salem,Ma 01970 13 November 2002 RE: Salem Business Park Technology Way Amended Order of Conditions DEP File No. 64-152 Dear Commission Members: On behalf of Fafard Real Estate&Development Corp. pursuant to General Condition 5,of the Amended Order of Conditions dated 12 April 2001 for the above mentioned project. We respectfully request a three year extension ofthe Amended Order of Conditions. If you have any questions or need additional information please do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely, Donald Seaberg r° - ;r! Project Manager Cc:D.E.P.,Northeast Region l 117 c� I www.benchmarkengineeringcorp,com FJOWTINTI, QUINN, GROVER '& FREY, P.C. 1 222 ESSEX STREET g SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970-3705 r W WILLIAM J.TINT] , TELEPHONE WILLIAM B.ARDIFF (1965- 1995) JWILLIAM F.QUINN (978)745-8065 • (978)744-2948 MARCIA MULFORD CINI SCOTT M.GROVERTELECOPIER OF COUNSEL MARC P.FREY (978)745-3369 IPSWICH OFFICE: e-mail tinti�shore.net TWO CENTRAL STREET IPSWICH,MASSACHUSETTS 01938 (978) 356-7878 March 15, 2001 DELIVERED BY HAND: Donald Cefalo Salem Conservation Commission One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 RE: Salem Glass Company Dear Don, I am writing to request an appointment with the Conservation Commission to discuss a modification to an existing Order of Conditions under Massachusetts DEP File No. 64-152 affecting the property at the intersection of Swampscott Road and Technology Way. The proposed modification would substitute the enclosed Site Plan of Salem Glass Company for the previously approved plan of Fafard Real Estate Development Corp. for an industrial condominium building on the site. I would appreciate it if you could arrange for this matter to be placed on the Commission's Agenda as soon as possible. Very truly ours, cott . Grover SMG/pdd 1�:-Q Ot ;i di 'vld Enclosures UV-D-lvS C111 -Z Ila, C1 Professional Land Surveyors&Civil Engineers ESSEX SURVEY SERVICE 1958- 1986 OSBORN PALMER 1911 - 1970 BRADFORD&WEED 1885- 1972 April 17, 2001 Ms. Deborah Hurlbert, Chair Salem Conservation Commission One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Re: F 12021 Salem Glass Company Technology Way Salem, MA Dear Ms. Hurlbert: In accordance with the Special Condition voted by the Commission at its meeting of April 12, 2001, 1 am providing herewith a copy of the Operation and Maintenance Plan for the stormwater management facilities on site. Please do not hesitate to call if there are any questions. �--Very truly yours, ,James H. MacDowell JHM—ps----_-____ enclosure cc: James Miller, Salem Glass Co. Attorney Scott Grover James Maguire, Realty Strategies 104 LOWELL STREET PEABODY, MASS. 01960 TELEPHONE: 978-531-8121 TELECOPIER: 978-531-5920 E-MAIL: elsai@prodigy.net OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PLAN PROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES SALEM GLASS COMPANY TECHNOLOGY WAY SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS A. Sweeping All paved areas on site shall be swept twice annually of all sand, debris and/or litter. B. Deep Sump Catch Basins 1. During Construction a. Protect catch basin grates with hay bale or stone, check dams until base paving course is installed and tributary landscape areas are stabilized and/or vegetated. b. Inspect basins monthly or following rainstorms of greater than one inch in 24 hours and dean when sediment levels area greater than two feet. 2. Long Term a. Inspect basins monthly and dean as necessary, but at least once every two years or when sediment levels reach two feet. C. Responsible Party The party responsible for operation and maintenance of stormwater management facilities will be: Salem Glass Company Technology Way Salem, MA 01970 Tel. No. (978) 744-5177 or its heirs and assigns. 2bobn band gufmy �i ; 6;1 104 LOWELL STREET• PEABODY, MASS. 01960 r,C��'VCD IR R` W . , 1921 A F R 19 t.l~1 11: LI SALEM PL_AR1;-!i •IG DEIPI. Ms. Deborah Hurlbert, Chair Salem Conservation Commission One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 �` ..._ i `�` '� . . ..y z � ._� ..._ ._ � � ._ fy ...w -� NOV-08-2000 WED 0226 PN FAFARD FAX NO. 1 508 875 8610 P. Ol OF FAFARD REAL ESTA:itj D ,. I V5nOPMENT ORP. 290 Euoi SixesAsttLAN'4o r_ TEL.(5�)881-1600 FAX ($OS)8758610 Re.sidenlial Sales (508)881-6662 P1 lIIif II C\ ir+eicial Sales/Leash{q (508)881-1572 C November 7, 2000 1 i Mr. Don Cefalo Salem Conservation Commission City Hall One Salem Green Salem. MA 01470 RE: OCC 64--152 Salem Business Park Dear Mr. a-tfalo: As you know,we have requested an extension on Order of Conditions 64-152 pertaining to the Salem Business Park. The extension is necessary because we have not sold all of the land in the park yet. We are presently working with a prospect on development of one of the parcels in the park. It is an important advantage to have the Order of Conditions in place for the park. Thank you for your assistance on this matter. Should you have question or require any additional information please no not hesitate to call. Very truly yours. �ce Hannert Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection DEP File Number: Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands 64-152 WPA Form 7 — Extension Permit for Orders of Conditions Provided by DEP Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 A. General Information Important: 1. Applicant: When filling out pp forms on the Fafard Real Estate and Development Corp. (Fafard Companies) computer, use Name only the tab key to move 290 Eliot Street your cursor- Mailing Address do not use the Ashland MA 01721 return key. Cityfrown State Zip Code .dIM I I 2. Property Owner(if different): Same Name redo Mailing Address city/town Slate Zip Code B. Finding Information The Order of Conditions (or Extension Permit) issued to the applicant or property owner listed above on: 9/10/98 Date A for work at: Swampscott Road Map 7 Lot 63 Street Address Assessor's Map/Plat Number Parcel/Lot Number recorded at the Registry of Deeds for: Essex NA NA County Book Page 54812 Certificate(if registered land) is hereby extended until: November 20, 2005 Date This date can be no more than 3 years from the expiration date of the Order of Conditions or the latest extension. Only unexpired Orders of Conditions or Extension may be extended. Date the Order was last extended (if applicable): November 20, 2001 (extended for one year) Date Issued by: Salem Conservation Commission WPA Form 7 Page I of 3 Rev.02100 � Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection DEP File Number: Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands 64-152 WPA Form 7 — Extension Permit for Orders of Conditions Provided by DEP �W Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c..131, §40 A. General Information Important: When filling out 1. Applicant: forms on the Fafard Real Estate and Development Corp. (Fafard Companies) computer, use Name only the tab key to move 290 Eliot Street your Cursor- Mailing Address do not use the Ashland MA 01721 return key. Citylrown State Zip Code .dl I 2. Property Owner(if different): Same Name mm Mailing Address City/Town Slate Zip Code B. Finding Information The Order of Conditions (or Extension Permit) issued to the applicant or property owner listed above on: 9/10/98 Date for work at: Swampscott Road Map 7 Lot 63 Street Address Assessors Map/Plat Number Parcel/Lot Number recorded at the Registry of Deeds for: Essex NA NA County Book Page 54812 Certificate(if registered land) is hereby extended until: November 20, 2005 Date This date can be no more than 3 years from the expiration date of the Order of Conditions or the latest extension. Only unexpired Orders of Conditions or Extension may be extended. Date the Order was last extended (if applicable): November 20, 2002 Date Issued by: Salem Conservation Commission WPA Form 7 Page 1 of 3 Rev.02100 ' Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection DEP File Number: ugBureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands WPA Form 7 — Extension Permit for Orders of Conditions Provided by DEP Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 B. Finding Information (cont.) This Order of Conditions Extension must be signed by a majority of the Conservation Commission and a copy sen to th appl'cant and a appropriate DEP Regional Office(see Appendix A). Signa r On Of NOVo,�D S 2Ab`L' Day Month and Year before me personally appeared to me known to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she executed e samq as his/her free act and deed. N tary Public My Commission Expires C. Recording Confirmation The applicant shall record this document in accordance with General Condition 8 of the Order of Conditions (see below), complete the form attached to this Extension Permit, have it stamped by the Registry of Deeds, and return it to the Conservation Commission. Note: General Condition 8 of the Order of Conditions requires the applicant, prior to commencement of work, to record the final Order(or in this case, the Extension Permit for the Order of Conditions) in the Registry of Deeds or the Land Court for the district in which the land is located, within the chain of title of the affected property. In the case of recorded land, it shall be noted in the Registry's Granter Index under the name of the owner of the land upon which the proposed work is to be done. In the case of registered land, it shall also be noted on the Land Court Certificate of Title of the owner of the land upon which the proposed work is done. Detach page 3 of Form 7 and submit it to the Conservation Commission prior to the expiration of the Order of Conditions subject to this Extension Permit. WPA Form 7 Page 2 of 3 Rev.02/00 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection DEP File Number: r� Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands 64-152 WPA Form 7 — Extension Permit for Orders of Conditions Provided by DEP �w Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 C. Recording Confirmation (cont.) To: Salem Conservation Commission Please be advised that the Extension Permit to the Order of Conditions for the project at: Off Swampscott Road Salem Industrial Park 64-152 Project Location DEP File Number - has been recorded at the Registry of Deed of: Essex County for: Property Owner and has been noted in the chain of title of the affected property in accordance with General Condition 8 of the original Order of Conditions on: Date Book Page If recorded land the instrument number which identifies this transaction is: Instrument Number If registered land, the document number which identifies this transaction is: Document Number Applicant Signature WPA Form 7 Page 3 of 3 Rev.02100 a Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection DEP File Number: W Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands 64-152 WPA Form 7 — Extension Permit for Orders of Conditions Provided by DEP Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 A. General Information Important: When filling out 1. Applicant: forms on the Fafard Real Estate and Development Corp (Fafard Companies) computer, use Name only the tab key to move 290 Eliot Street your Cursor-- Mailing Address do not use the Ashland MA 01721 return key. Cityrrown State Zip Code „A 2. Property Owner(if different): Same Name / rewn Mailing Address .I� ' 1 City/Town State Zip Code B. Finding Information The Order of Conditions (or Extension Permit) issued to the applicant or property owner listed above on: ("'j 9/10/98 Date for work at: Swampscott Road Map 7 Lot 63 Street Address Assessor's Map/Plat Number - Parcel/Lot Number recorded at the Registry of Deeds for: Essex NA NA County Book Page 54812 Certificate(if registered land) is hereby extended until: November 20, 2005 Date This date can be no more than 3 years from the expiration date of the Order of Conditions or the latest extension. Only unexpired Orders of Conditions or Extension may be extended. Date the Order was last extended (if applicable): November 20, 2002 Date Issued by: Salem Conservation Commission 41IIIIIIIIIIIIII(IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Southern 4004) at ch: RevAFcrm o2loo7 1/3/2003 E100 sA ict 111356 1:12 Registry extn Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection DEP File Number: Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands WPA Form 7 — Extension Permit for Orders of Conditionsroyi Provided by DEP Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 B. Finding Information (cont.) This Order of Conditions Extension must be signed by a majority of the Conservation Commission and a copy sen to th applicant and a appropriate DEP Regional Office (see Appendix A). Signa r. I _ J c — On Fe. rteo.! h Of Wows Dj Jx dab Z- Day Month and Year if before me personally appeared Ab�vz yv�.R,S to me known to be.the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged thIN e execu ed he sam as his/her free act and deed. �.^e� 3O 2oa} Public My Comm sion Expires C. Recording Confirmation, The applicant shall record this document in accordance with General Condition.8 of the Order of Conditions (see below), complete the form attached to this Extension Permit;have it stamped by the Registry of Deeds, and return it to the Conservation Commission. Note: General Condition 8 of the Order of Conditions requires the applicant, prior to commencement of work, to record the final Order(or in this case, the Extension Permit for the Order of Conditions) in the Registry of Deeds or the Land Court for the district in which the land is located, within the chain of title of the affected property. In the case of recorded land, it shall be noted in the Registry's Granter Index under the name of the owner of the land upon which the proposed work is to be done. In the case of registered land, it shall also be noted on the Land Court Certificate of Title of the owner of the land upon which the proposed work is done. Detach page 3 of Form 7 and submit it to the Conservation Commission prior to the expiration of the Order of Conditions subject to this Extension Permit. WPA Foon Rev.0=0 411509 (Paye 2 of 4) Southern Essex District Registry 1/3/2003 11:12:00 PM extn Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection DEP File"umber` Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands 64-152 WPA,Form 7 — Extension Permit for Orders of Conditions Provided by DEP >�w Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 C. Recording Confirmation (cont.) To'. Salem Conservation Commission Please be advised that the Extension Permit to the Order of Conditions for the project at: _Off Swampscott Road Salem Industrial Park 64-152 Protect Location - DEP Pile Number has been recorded at the Registry of Deed of: Essex County for: Property Owner and has been noted in the chain of title of the affected property in accordance with General Condition 8 of the original Order of Conditions on: Date Book Page If recorded land the instrument number which identifies this transaction is: Instrument Number If registered land, the document number which identifies this transaction is: Document Number Applicant Signature WPA Form] 411509 (Page 3 of 4 Rev.02/00 Southern Essex 7istrict Registry 1/3/2003 11:12.00 RM extn 310 CMR 10 . 99 DEP Fite ko. 64-152 Form 7 (To be provided by DEP) City/Torn Salam Applicant Howard A. Fafard Commonwealth Of Massachusetts - EXTENSION PERMIT MASSACHUSETTS WETLANDS PROTECTION ACT G.L. c. 131, 540 From: Salem Consevation rommigQIPP __ Issuing Authority To: Howard A. Fafard 290 Elliot StrpptY AcT,1anr9 VA (Name) (Address) The Order of Conditions (or Extension Permit) issued on 9/12/96 (date) to Fafard Companines (name) for work at Swampscott Road T.nr 61 (address) is hereby extended F-g�; jY4igXUX�xKMU__XYiKf until November 20, 1998 This Extension Permit will expire on November 20, 1998 (date) This document shall be recorded in accordance with General Ccidition 8 of the Order of Conditions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Leave Space Blank) 7-1 Effective 11/10/89 Issued by Salem/Cons e tion Co ission Signature (s) bW 61 t � when issued by the Conservation Commission this Extension Permit must be signed by a majority of its members. . On this I.nrh _day of September 19 98 before me personally appeared The above mentioned to me known to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged thatEC2=asis/her free act and deed. 400Z'ZT AON M!�g uolsrwLuO34y 3!19ed f4gDN _. Not y P � is My commission STEPHEN DIBBLE Notary Public MY Commisslon Empires Nov.12,2004 Detach on dotted Line and submit to theSalemvaeBn 6eEIt onion to commencement of work. .......................................__..................................... To Issuing Authority Please be advised that the Extension Permit to the Order of conditions for the project at File Number has been recorded at the Registry of and has been noted in the chain of title of the affected property in accordance with General Condition B of the original order of conditions on 1 19 If recorded land, the instrument number.much identifies this transaction is If registered lard, the document number which identifies this Transaction is Signature Applicant 7-2 CO CITY OF SALEM CONSERVATION COMMISSION June 10,2004 Department of Environmental Protection One Winter Street Boston, MA 02108 To Whom It May Concern: The Salem Conservation Commission respectfully requests that you withdraw the NOI filing attached to DEP File#64-0370. The applicant of this project was required under DEP File#64-0152 to request an Amendment to an Order of Conditions, rather than refile an NOI. Thank you for your attention to this matter, should you have any further question or require any additional information, you can contact me at (978) 745-9595 ext 311. Sincerely, Frank Taormi a Planner/Conservation Agent 120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 • TEL: 978.745.9595 FAx: 978.740.0404 0 WWW.SALEM.COM w '0)j rut1i /vLr COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ONE WINTER STREET, BOSTON, MA 02108 617-292-5500 MITT ROMNEY ELLEN ROY HERZFELDER Governor Secretary KERRY HEALEY ROBERT W.GOLLEDGE,Jr. Lieutenant Governor Commissioner /1Cplpput�l(`W � � DEP File# 064-0370 RE: NOTIFICATION OF WETLANDS PROTECTION ACT FILE NUMBER SALEM DATE: 6/7/2004 1:42 PM (city/town) The Department of Environmental Protection has received a Notice of Intent filed in accordance with the Wetlands Protection Act(M.G.L. c. 131, §40): Applicant: Norman Dube Owner: Address: 117 Judge Road Address: Lynn,MA 01904 LOCUS: 4 Technology Way IF CHECKED,;THE.FOLLOWING ITEM(S)APPLY TO THIS NOTICE OF INTENT: A.-(X)-This project has been,assigned the following file# : 064-0370 Although a file#is being issued,please;note'the following: C. Other Regulatory Jurisdiction g Y 1. 0 Application has been forwarded to Waterways Regulatory Program to determine if a Chapter 91 License is required. 2. 0 Applicant is advised to forward a copy of the Notice of Intent to the Corps of Engineers for review(call 1-800-362-4367 for information). D. 0 401 Water Quality Certification The project described in your Notice of Intent requires a 401 Water Quality Certification from the Department of Environmental Protection and may require submittal of a 401 application form. See below for further details: 1. 0 Based upon the information submitted in and with your Notice of Intent a separate 401 Water Quality Certification application form is not required. The Department has reviewed the plans submitted by the applicant and finds that there is reasonable assurance that the project or activity will be conducted in a manner that will not violate the Massachusetts Surface Water Quality Standards,provided that: a) the applicant receives and complies with a Final Order of Conditions from the local conservation commission or the Department; b) l.The Order,of Conditions:does not cause the loss of more than 5,000sq.R. of bordering vegetated-wetlands anil land under water and/or the dredging of more than 100 cubic yards of land under water; ` This information is available in alternate format.Call Aprel McCabe,ADA Coordinator at 1-617-556-1171.TDD service-1-800-298-2207. DEP on the World Wide Web: http:/Iw .mass.gov/dep C Printed on Recycled Paper c) any loss of vegetated wetlands has been mitigated with a minimum replication of 1:1; and is not part of a subdivision; does not cause the loss of any Wetlands designated as d) The project is not exempt from the M.G.L. c. 131, §40-the Wetlands Protection Act; Outstanding Resource Waters; and does not cause the loss of any salt marsh. , Therefore,provided that the above conditions are satisfied,the Final Order of Conditions will serve as the Water Quality Certification for this project. This does not relieve the applicant of the duty to comply with any other statutes or regulations. 2. O Before the activity described in the Notice of Intent can commence,you must obtain a Water Quality Certification form from this Regional Office. Please complete the enclosed 401 Water Quality Certification application form and file it with this Regional Office for review. 3. O Your project involves dredging of greater than 100 cubic yards of material or requires a permit from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission for work in"waters of the Commonwealth." Therefore,your proposed project is subject to 314 CMR 9.00 and requires a Water Quality Certification. Please complete the enclosed 401 Water Quality Certification application form and file it with the Department of Environmental Protection,Waterways Program,and One Winter Street,Boston,MA 02108. Contact the Division of Waterways program at 617-292-5655 if you have and questions. For more information please contact: Mr.WAYNE LOZZI at 617 654-6681. Cc: Conservation Commission: Salem Conservation Commission, City Hall 1 Salem Green CO v CITY OF SALEM CONSERVATION COMMISSION City of Salem Conservation Commission Will hold a public hearing for an Amendment to an Order of Conditions under the Wetlands Protection Act, Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 131, Section 40 and Salem's Ordinance Pertaining to General Wetlands at the request of Norman Dube, 117 Judge Road, Lynn Ma 01904. The purpose of the hearing is to discuss amendments to a previously approved Order of Conditions (DEP #64-152) the construction of a building, access road, parking area, and related earthwork within a buffer zone at 4 Technology Way. This hearing will be held on Thursday, May 27, 2004 at 6:00 p.m. in Room 313, Third Floor, 120 Washington Street. Kevin P. Cornacchio Chairman May 20, 2004 Please send bill to: Parsons &Faia, Inc. 60 Lewis Street Lynn, MA 01902 781-593-0806 120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TEL: 978.745.9595 FAx: 978.740.0404 4 WWW.SALEM.COM THE`wR, I/TVCMAL specializing in the design, engineering and C/RVV production of surface heaters, air heaters, molded heaters, heater assemblies, and infrared panel emitters Conservation Commission City of Salem, MA May 27, 2004 Re: Application of Norman Dube To The Commission As abutters to the 4 Technology Way location and acting for KAK Realty Trust, J. Kellogg trustee, we respectively request that the commission delay a ruling on this matter until your next scheduled meeting,to allow us time to review this application and to provide comment to the commission. Due to prior commitment I am not able to attend the meeting myself and have designated that Timothy Doggett, Materials Manger, appear before the commission to make the request. Respectfully, Thermal Circuits Inc Ant A. Klein Pr s t and CEO ��'gV I NG ..q55-1000. ° 45 i 5� ..YEARS O H� aNn Thermal Circuits Inc. One Technology Way Technology Park Salem, Massachusetts 01970-7000 PHONE 978.745.1162 EMAIL 808heat Cmthermalcircuits.com WEB www.thermalcircults.com FAX 978.740.0495 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection DEP File Number: Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands Ll WPA Form 5 — Order of Conditions 64-152 Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 A. General Information Important: Salem When filling From: 1.Conservation Commission out forms on the computer, 2.This issuance is for (check one): ❑ Order of Conditions ® Amended Order of Conditions use only the tab key to 3.To: Applicant: move your cursor-do not Norman Dube use the return a.First Name b. Last Name c.Company key. 117 Judge Road d. Mailing Address °6 Lynn MA 01904 e.City/Town f.State g.Zip Code 4. Property Owner(if different from applicant): Swampscott Realty L.L.0 a. First Name b. Last Name c.Company 290 Eliot Street d.Mailing Address Ashland Ma 01721 e.City/Town f.State g.Zip Code 5. Project Location: 4 Technology Way Salem a.Street Address b.City/Town Map 7 Lot 79 C.Assessors Map/Plat Number d.Parcel/Lot Number Latitude and Longitude, if known (note: electronic filers will click for GIS locator): e.latitude f. Longitude s. Property recorded at the Registry of Deeds for(attach additional information if more than one parcel): Essex 54812 Doc#411509 a. County b.Certificate(if registered land) c. Book d.Page 7. Dates: 10/30/87 9/9/04 9/9/04 a. Date Notice of Intent Filed b.Date Public Hearing Closed c.Date of Issuance a. Final Approved Plans and Other Documents (attach additional plan or document references as needed): 1. Stormwater Control System 9/10/04, - SP Engineering 2. Proposed Site Plan Technology Way 9/10/04, - Parsons & Faia Inc. SP Engineering & Parsons & Faia Inc. 1. Charles D. Faia, 2. David L. Bramley b. Prepared By c.Signed and Stamped by 9/10/04 1" = 20' _ d. Final Revision Date e.Scale Stormwater Management Plan, SP Engineering, July 2004 f.Additional Plan or Document Title g. Date $525 $250 $275 9. Total NlPA Fee Paid: a.Total Fee Paid b.State Fee Paid c.City/Town Fee Paid wpafomsdoc• rev.9/13/04 Page 1 of 9 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands DEP File Number: WPA Form 5 - Order of Conditions 64-152 Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 B. Findings t. Findings pursuant to the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act: Following the review of the above-referenced Notice of Intent and based on the information provided in this application and presented at the public hearing,this Commission finds that the areas in which work is proposed is significant to the following interests of the Wetlands Protection Act. Check all that apply: a. ® Public Water Supply b. ❑ Land Containing Shellfish c. ® Prevention of Pollution d. ® Private Water Supply e. f. ® Protection of Wildlife pp y ❑ Fisheries Habitat g. ❑ Groundwater Supply h. ® Storm Damage Prevention I. ® Flood Control 2. This Commission hereby finds the project,as proposed, is: (check one of the following boxes) Approved subject to: ® the following conditions which are necessary in accordance with the performance standards set forth in the wetlands regulations. This Commission orders that all work shall be performed in accordance with the Notice of Intent referenced above, the following General Conditions, and any other special conditions attached to this Order. To the extent that the following conditions modify or differ from the plans, specifications, or other proposals submitted with the Notice of Intent, these conditions shall control. Denied because: ❑ the proposed work cannot be conditioned to meet the performance standards set forth in the wetland regulations. Therefore,work on this project may not go forward unless and until a new Notice of Intent is submitted which provides measures which are adequate to protect these interests, and a final Order of Conditions is issued. A description of the performance standards which the proposed work cannot meet is attached to this Order. ❑ the information submitted by the applicant is not sufficient to describe the site, the work, or the effect of the work on the interests identified in the Wetlands Protection Act. Therefore, work on this project may not go forward unless and until a revised Notice of Intent is submitted which provides sufficient information and includes measures which are adequate to protect the Act's interests, and a final Order of Conditions is issued. A description of-the specific information which is lacking and why it is necessary is attached to this Order as per 310 CMR 10.05(6)(c). Inland Resource Area Impacts: Check all that apply below. (For Approvals Only) Resource Area Proposed Permitted Proposed Permitted Alteration Alteration Replacement Replacement 3. ❑ Bank alinearfeet b.linearfeet c.linearfeet d.linear feet a. ❑ Bordering Vegetated Wetland a.square feet b.square feet c.square feet d.square feet 5. ❑ Land Under a.square feet b.square feet c.square feet d.square feet Waterbodies and Waterways e.cu.yd dredged f.cu.yd dredged wpafom5.doc• rev.9/13104 Page 2 of 9 LlMassachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands DEP File Number: WPA Form 5 - Order of Conditions 64-152 Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 B. Findings (cont.) Resource Area Proposed Permitted Proposed Permitted Alteration Alteration Replacement Replacement 6. ❑ Bordering Land Subject to Flooding a.square feet b.square feet c.square feet d.square feet Cubic Feet Flood Storage e.cubic feet f.cubic feet g.cubic feet h.cubic feet T ❑ Isolated Land Subject to Flooding a.square feet b.square feet Cubic Feet Flood Storage c.cubic feet d.cubic feet e.cubic feet f.cubic feet 8. ❑ Riverfront area a.total sq.feet b.total sq.feet Sq ft within 100 ft c.square feet d.square feet Sq ft between 100-200 ft e.square feet f.square feet Coastal Resource Area Impacts: Check all that apply below. (For Approvals Only) 9. ❑ Designated Port Indicate size under Land Under the Ocean, below Areas 1o. ❑ Land Under the Ocean a.square feel b.square feet c. cu.yd dredged d.cu.yd dredged 11. ❑ Barrier Beaches Indicate size under Coastal Beaches and/or Coastal Dunes below 12. ❑ Coastal Beaches a.square feet b.square feet c.cty nourishmt. d.cly nourishmt. 13. ❑ Coastal Dunes a.square feet b.square feet c.cty nourishmt. d.dy nourishmt 14. ❑ Coastal Banks a. linea (feet b.linear feet 15. ❑ Rocky Intertidal Shores a.square feet b.square feet 16. ❑ Salt Marshes a.square feet b.square feet c.square feet d.square feet 17. ❑ Land Under Salt Ponds a.square feet b.square feet c.cu.yd dredged d.cu.yd dredged 18. ❑ Land Containing Shellfish a.square feet b.square feet c.square feet d.square feet 19. ❑ Fish Runs Indicate size under Coastal Banks, inland Bank, Land Under the Ocean, and/or inland Land Under Waterbodies and Waterways, above a.cu.yd dredged b.cu.yd dredged 20. ❑ Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage a.square feet b.square feet wpafomSAoc• rev.9113/04 Page 3 of 9 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands DEP File Number: WPA Form 5 - Order of Conditions 64-152 Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 C. General Conditions Under Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act (only applicable to approved projects) 1. Failure to comply with all conditions stated herein, and with all related statutes and other regulatory measures, shall be deemed cause to revoke or modify this Order. 2. The Order does not grant any property rights or any exclusive privileges; it does not authorize any injury to private property or invasion of private rights. 3. This Order does not relieve the permittee or any other person of the necessity of complying with all other applicable federal, state, or local statutes, ordinances, bylaws, or regulations. 4. The work authorized hereunder shall be completed within three years from the date of this Order unless either of the following apply: a. the aiork is a maintenance dredging project as provided for in the Act; or b. the tame for completion has been extended to a specified date more than three years, but less than five years, from the date of issuance. If this Order is intended to be valid for more than three years, the extension date and the special circumstances warranting the extended time period are set forth as a special condition in this Order. 5. This Order may be extended by the issuing authority for one or more periods of up to three years each upon application to the issuing authority at least 30 days prior to the expiration date of the Order. 6. Any fill used in connection with this project shall be clean fill. Any fill shall contain no trash, refuse, rubbish, or debris, including but not limited to lumber, bricks, plaster, wire, lath, paper, cardboard, pipe, tires, ashes, refrigerators, motor vehicles, or parts of any of the foregoing. 7. This Order is not final until all administrative appeal periods from this Order have elapsed, or if such an appeal has been taken, until all proceedings before the Department have been completed. 8. No work shall be undertaken until the Order has become final and then has been recorded in the Registry of Deeds or the Land Court for the district in which the land is located,within the chain of title of the affected property. In the case of recorded land, the Final Order shall also be noted in the Registry's Grantor Index under the name of the owner of the land upon which the proposed work is to be done. In the case of the registered land, the Final Order shall also be noted on the Land Court Certificate of Tiile of the owner of the land upon which the proposed work is done.The recording inforn ation shall be submitted to this Conservation Commission on the form at the end of this Order, which form must be stamped by the Registry of Deeds, prior to the commencement of work. 9. A sign shall be displayed at the site not less then two square feet or more than three square feet in size bearing the words, "Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection" [or, "MA DEP'J "File Number 64-152 " wpaform5.dw• rev.9113104 Page 4 of 9 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands DEP File Number: WPA Form 5 - Order of Conditions 64-152 Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 C. General Conditions Under Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act 10. Where the Department of Environmental Protection is requested to issue a Superseding Order, the Conservation Commission shall be a party to all agency proceedings and hearings before DEP. 11. Upon completion of the work described herein, the applicant shall submit a Request for Certificate of Compliance (WPA Form 8A) to the Conservation Commission. 12. The work shall conform to the plans and special conditions referenced in this order. 13. Any change to the plans identified in Condition#12 above shall require the applicant to inquire of the Conservation Commission in writing whether the change is significant enough to require the filing of a new Notice of Intent. 14. The Agent or members of the Conservation Commission and the Department of Environmental Protection shall have the right to enter and inspect the area subject to this Order at reasonable hours to evaluate compliance with the conditions stated in this Order, and may require the submittal of any data deemed necessary by the Conservation Commission or Department for that evaluation. 15. This Order of Conditions shall apply to any successor in interest or successor in control of the property subject to this Order and to any contractor or other person performing work conditioned by this Order. 16. Prior to the start of work, and if the project involves work adjacent to a Bordering Vegetated Wetland, the boundary of the wetland in the vicinity of the proposed work area shall be marked by wooden stakes or flagging. Once in place, the wetland boundary markers shall be maintained until a Certificate of Compliance has been issued by the Conservation Commission. 17. All sedimentation barriers shall be maintained in good repair until all disturbed areas have been fully stabilized with vegetation or other means. At no time shall sediments be deposited in a wetland or water body. During construction, the applicant or his/her designee shall inspect the erosion controls on a daily basis and shall remove accumulated sediments as needed. The applicant shall immediately control any erosion problems that occur at the site and shall also immediately notify the Conservation Commission, which reserves the right to require additional erosion and/or damage prevention controls it may deem necessary. Sedimentation barriers shall serve as the limit of work unless another limit of work line has b.:en approved by this Order. Special Conditions: If you need more SEE ATTACHED SHEET space for additional conditions, select box to attach a text document wpaform5.doc• rev.9/13/04 Page 5 of 9 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands DEP File Number: WPA Form 5 - Order of Conditions 64-152 Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 D. Findings Under Municipal Wetlands Bylaw or Ordinance t. Furthermore, the hereby finds (check one that applies): Conservation Commission 2. ❑ that the proposed work cannot be conditioned to meet the standards set forth in a municipal ordinance or bylaw specifically: a. P,lunicipal Ordinrnce or Bylaw b.Citation Therefore, work on this project may not go forward unless and until a revised Notice of Intent is submitted which provides measures which are adequate to meet these standards, and a final Order of Conditions is issued. a. ❑ that the following additional conditions are necessary to comply with a municipal ordinance or bylaw: a. Pnunicipal Ordinance or Bylaw b.Citation The Commission orders that all work shall be performed in accordance with the following conditions and with the Notice of Intent referenced above. To the extent that the following conditions modify or differ from the plans, specifications, or other proposals submitted with the Notice of Intent, the conditions shall control. If you need more space for C. The special conditions relating to municipal ordinance or bylaw are as follows: additional conditions, select box to attach a text document ❑ wpafom 5.dac• rev.9/13/00 Page 6 of 9 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection DEP File Number: Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands WPA Form 5 — Order of Conditions Provided by DEP Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 B. Findings (cont.) Additional conditions relating to municipal ordinance or bylaw: This Order is valid for three years, unless otherwise specified as a special condition pursuant to General Conditions K from the date of issuance. 9�T/og Date This Order must be signed by a majority of the Conservation Commission. The Order must be mailed by certified mail (return receipt requested)or hand delivered to the applicant. A copy also must be mailed or hand delivered at the same time to the appropriate Department of Environmental Protection Regional Office (see App ix a roperty own (if different from PH int) Signatures d On `l ' Of SenkM��ct , zooy Day Month and Year before me personally appeared I�e 2,4vC ✓?AeHreJ to me known to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledg a e/ In cute same as his/her free act and deed. � � ELL Notary Public My Commission Ex �mmonwealth of Massachusetts This Order is issued to thea applicant as follows: My Commission Expires PP November 1,2007 by hand delivery on by certified mail, return receipt requested, on Date Date WPA Forth 5 Rev.02/00 Page'f oi9 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands DEP File Number: WPA Form 5 - Order of Conditions 64-152 Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 F. Appeals The applicant, the owner, any person aggrieved by this Order, any owner of land abutting the land subject to this Order, or any ten residents of the city or town in which such land is located, are hereby notified of their right to request the appropriate DEP Regional Office to issue a Superseding Order of Conditions. The request must be made by certified mail or hand delivery to the Department,with the appropriate filing fee and a completed Request of Departmental Action Fee Transmittal Form, as provided in 310 CMR 10.03(7) within ten business days from the date of issuance of this Order. A copy of the request shall at the same time be sent by certified mail or hand delivery to the Conservation Commission and to the applicant, if he/she is not the appellant. The request shall state clearly and concisely the objections to the Order which is being appealed and how the Order does not contribute to the protection of the interests identified in the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act, (M.G.L. c. 131, § 40) and is inconsistent with the wetlands regulations (310 CMR 10.00). To the extent that the Order is based on a municipal ordinance or bylaw, and not on the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act or regulations, the Department has no appellate jurisdiction. Section G, Recording Information is available on the following page. wpafo=5.dw• rev.9/13/04 Page 8 of 9 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands DEP File Number: WPA Form 5 - Order of Conditions 64-152 Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 G. Recording Information This Order of Conditions must be recorded in the Registry of Deeds or the Land Court for the district in which the land is located, within the chain of title of the affected property. In the case of recorded land, the Final Order shall also be noted in the Registry's Grantor Index under the name of the owner of the land subject to the Order. In the case of registered land, this Order shall also be noted on the Land Court Certificate of Title of the owner of the land subject to the Order of Conditions. The recording information on Pace 7 of this form shall be submitted to the Conservation Commission listed below. SALEM Conservation Commission Detach on dolled line, have stamped by the Registry of Deeds and submit to the Conservation Commission. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To: SALEM Conservation Commission Please be advised that the Order of Conditions for the Project at: 4 Technology Way 64-152 Project Location DEP File Number Has been recorded at the Registry of Deeds of: Canty Book Page for: Property Owner and has been noted in the chain of title of the affected property in: Dcok Page In accordance with the Order of Conditions issued on: Date If recorded land, the instrument number identifying this transaction is: Insvument Number If registered land, the document number identifying this transaction is: Dca!ment Number Sigia:ure of:applicant wpafw 5.aoc• rev.9/73/04 Page 9of9 Attachment to Order of Conditions#64-152 Page lof Salem Conservation Commission SPECIAL CONDITIONS—DEP FILE # 64-152 (Amended) Atlantic Paving,4 Technology Way, Salem, MA ADDITIONAL FINDINGS This parcel does not include habitat of rare wildlife, nor does it contain certified veinal pools, according to the June 1, 2003 Map of Estimated Habitats of Rare Wildlife and Certified Vernal Pools, published by the Massachusetts Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program. This Order is issued under the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act,M.G.L.Chapter 131, Section 40 and the City of Salem Wetlands Protection Ordinance,Salem Code Chapter 34,Section 34-1 —34-13. This Order permits the construction of a building,paved parking area,access road,related earthwork,and excavation of a forebay&infiltration pond. 1. The Conservation Agent will be notified 48 hours prior to commencement of construction activities(978-745- 9595 ext. 311). Members and agents of the Salem Conservation Commission(Commission) shall have the right to enter and inspect the premises to evaluate and ensure compliance with the conditions and performance standards stated in this Order, the Notice of Intent,the referenced plans,the Act,and 310 CMR 10.00, and may require any information,measurements,photographs,observation and/or materials or may require the submittal of any data or information deemed necessary by the Commission, agent, or DEP determines that any of the work is not in compliance with this Order of Conditions. Work shall not resume until the Commission is satisfied that the work will comply, and has so notified the applicant in writing. 2. Approval of this application does not constitute compliance with any law or regulation other than MGL Chapter 131, Section 40, and Wetlands Regulations 310 CMR 10.00. 3. This Order shall apply to any successor in control or successor in interest of the property described in the Notice of Intent and accompanying plans. These obligations shall be expressed in covenants in all deeds to succeeding owners or portions of the property. 4. The form provided at the end of this Order shall be completed and stamped at the Registry of Deeds after the expiration of the 10-day appeal period and within 30 days of the issuance if no request for appeal has been filed with the Department of Environmental Protection. This form shall be returned to the Commission within 21 days of recording accordance and prior to commencement of any activities subject to the Order of Conditions. 5. Prior to any work commencing, a sign shall be displayed showing DEP file#64-152, and not placed on a living tree. 6. The term"Applicant"as used in this Order of Conditions shall refer to the owner,any successor in interest or successor in control of the property referenced in the Notice of Intent,supporting documents and this Order of Conditions. The Commission shall be notified in writing within 30 days of all transfers of title of any portion of the property that takes place prior to issuance of the Certificate of Compliance. 7. It is the responsibility of the applicant to procure all other applicable federal,state and local permits and approvals associated with this project. These permits may include but are not necessarily limited to the following: Attachment to Order of Conditions#64-152 Page 2of (1) Section 404 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act(P.L. 92-500, 86 stat. 816),U.S.Army Corp of Engineers. (2) Water Quality Certification in accordance with the Federal Water Pollution Control under authority of sec. 27(5)of Chapter 21 of the Massachusetts General Laws as codified (3) Flood Plain (4) Grading Ordinance 8. If there are conflicting conditions within this Order,the stricter condition(s) shall rule. 9. All work shall be performed so as to ensure that there will be no sedimentation into wetlands and surface waters during construction or after completion of the project. 10. The Commission and its Administrator shall have the discretion to modify the erosion/siltation control methods and boundary during construction if necessary. 11. All work shall be performed in accordance with this Order of Conditions and approved site plans(s). No alteration of wetland resource areas or associated buffer zone,other than that approved in this Order, shall occur on this property without prior approval from the Commission. 12. If any changes are made in the above-described plan(s)which may or will alter an area subject to protection under the Wetlands Protection Act,or any changes in activity subject to regulations under G.L.Ch. 131, Section 40,the applicant shall inquire from this Commission in writing,prior to their implementation in the field, whether the change(s)is significant enough to require the filing of a new Notice of Intent. Any error in the plans or information submitted by the applicant shall be considered changes and the above procedures shall be followed. A copy of such request shall at the same time be sent to the Department of Environmental Protection. 13. In conjunction with the sale of this property or any portion thereof before a Certificate of Compliance has been issued, the applicant or current landowner shall submit to the Commission a signed statement by the buyer that he/she is aware of an outstanding Order of Conditions on the property and has received a copy of the Order of Conditions. 14. Conditions number as indicated shall continue in force beyond the Certificate of Compliance,in perpetuity, and shall be referred to in all future deeds to this property. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION 15. Prior to commencement of any activity on this site, there shall be a PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING between the project supervision; the contractor responsible for the work or its administrator to and phone numbers of all responsible parties shall be registered with the Commission at the pre-construction meeting. 16. Prior to the pre-construction meeting and commencement of any activity on this site, sedimentation and erosion control barriers shall be installed as shown on the approval plan(s)and detail drawings. The Commssion and/or its Administrator shall inspect and approve such installation at the pre-construction meeting. 17. Prior to the commencement of any activity on this site, the applicant or current landowner shall submit to the Commission in writing a construction schedule/sequence of work to complete this project. 18. Prior to any work on site,the proposed limits of work shall be clearly marked with stakes or flags and shall be confirmed by the Commission or its Administrator. Such markers shall be checked and replaced as necessary and shall be maintained until all construction is complete. Workers shall be informed that no use of machinery, Attachment to Order of Conditions#64-152 Page 3of storage of machinery or materials, stockpiling of soil or construction activity is to occur beyond this line at anytime. 19. Prior to commencement of construction on site,the limits of wetland resource areas closest to construction activity shall be flagged with surveyor's tape and shall remain in place during construction. The limits of areas to be impacted and the limits of work in the replication area(s)shall be clearly flagged. 20. There shall be 30 hay bales and wooden staked stored under cover on the site to be used only for emergency erosion control. EROSION CONTROL 21. Appropriate erosion control devices shall be in place prior to the beginning of any phases of construction, and shall be maintained during construction in the wetland areas and buffer zones. The erosion control specification provided in the Notice of Intent and the erosion control provision in the Order will be the minimum standards for this project;additional measures may be required by the Commission. 22. All debris, fill and excavated material shall be stockpiled a location far enough away from the wetland resource areas to prevent sediment from entering wetland resource areas. 23. Erosion and sedimentation control devices shall be inspected after each storm event and repaired or replaced as necessary. Any accumulated silt adjacent to the barriers shall be removed. 24. The areas of construction shall remain in a stable condition at the close of each construction day. 25. Any de-watering of trenches or other excavations required during construction shall be conducted so as to prevent siltation of wetland resource areas. All discharges from de-watering activities shall be filtered through haybale sediment traps,silt filter bags or other means approved by the Commission or its Administrator. 26. Within thirty days of completion of construction on any given portion of the project, all disturbed areas in the completed portion of the site shall be permanently stabilized with rapidly growing vegetative cover,using sufficient top soil to assure long-term stabilization of disturbed areas. 27. If soils are to be disturbed for longer than two months, a temporary cover of rye or other grass should be established to prevent erosion and sedimentation. If the season is not appropriate for plant growth, exposed surfaces shall be stabilized by other appropriate erosion control measures,firmly anchored,to prevent soils from being washed by rain or flooding. DURING CONSTRUCTION 28. A copy of the Order of Conditions,construction plans,and copies of the documents and reports cited in Condition# 11, shall be on the site upon commencement and during any site work for contractors to view and adhere to. 29. Erosion and sedimentation control devices shall be inspected after each storm event and repaired or replaced as necessary. Any accumulated silt adjacent to the barriers shall be removed. 30. Only clean fill, free of masonry, stumps,asphalt, and any other kind of waste material shall be used on the site. Attachment to Order of Conditions#64-152 Page 4of 31. All wasteroducts rubbed stumps,slash, construction materials,etc. shall be deposited at least 100 feet from P + g P P i wetland resource areas and 200 feet from rivers. 32. All filling or removal of waste material from the site shall be done in accordance with the regulations of the City of Salem Health Department. 33. Cement trucks shall not be washed out in any wetland resource or buffer zone area. Any deposit of cement or concrete products into a buffer zone or wetland resource area shall be removed by hand. 34. No fuel,oil, or other pollutants shall be stored in any resource area or the buffer zone thereto,unless specified in this Order of Conditions. 35. There shall be no pumping of water from wetland resource areas. 36. During construction,all drainage structures shall be inspected regularly and cleaned as necessary. 37. The project shall not cause an increase in run-off onto adjacent properties,either during construction or when completed. 38. The applicant is hereby notified that failure to comply with all requirements herein may result in the issuance of enforcement actions by the Conservation Commission including,but not limited to, civil administrative penalties under M.G.L. Chapter 21A, section 16. POST CONSTRUCTION 39. All disturbed areas, slopes and proposed landscape areas shall be loamed and seeded or stabilized through the use of erosion control blankets or other approved means. All disturbed areas will be graded, loamed,and seeded prior to November 1 of each year,if possible. No disturbed areas or stockpiled material will be left unprotected or without erosion controls during the winter. 40. Upon completion of construction,the applicant or current landowner shall submit the following to the Commission to request a Certificate of Compliance: (1) A letter requesting a Certificate including the following information: a. Name and address of current landowner; b. Name and address of the individual/trust or other entity to whom the Certificate is to be issued: c. Street address and lot number for the project;and d. DEP file number (2) A letter from a Registered Professional Engineering or Land Surveyor certifying compliance of the property with this Order of Conditions (3) An"As-Built"plan signed and stamped by a Registered Professional Engineer showing post-construction conditions and: a. As-built elevations of all drainage ways constructed within 100 feet of any wetland resource area; b. As-built elevations and grades of all filled or altered wetland resource areas,buffer zones and replicated areas; and c. Distances to all structures within 100 feet of any wetland resource area. 41. When issued,the Certificate of Compliance must be recorded at the Essex County Registry of Deeds. 42. If the completed work differs from that in the original plans and conditions, the report must specify how the work differs; at which time the applicant shall first request a modification to the Order. Only upon review and Attachment to Order of Conditions# 64-152 Page 5of approval by the Commission,may the applicant request in writing a Certificate of Compliance as described above. 43. Erosion control devices shall remain in place and properly functioning until all exposed soils have been stabilized with final vegetative cover and the Commission and/or its Administrator has authorized their removal. ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS 44. Granite curbing shall be installed along the fore bay area and riprap area of the parking lot as shown on the approved referenced plans. 45. The stormwater control systems shall be maintained per the approved maintenance checklist. 46. Documentation of maintenance to these stormwater control systems shall be submitted annually or biannually depending on the approved maintenance frequency per the approved maintenance checklist to the Salem Conservation Commission. ��vr �dnehOl.- Der6`�` )SZ s - z Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection DEP File Number: Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands 64-152 WPA Form 5 - Order of Conditions Provided by DEP Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 A. General Information Important: From: When filling out forms on Salem the computer, Conservation Commission use only the tab key to This issuance if for(check one): move your cursor-do ❑ Order of Conditions not use the return key. ® Amended Order of Conditions -4/12/01 To: Applicant: Property Owner(if different from applicant): Salem Glass Company Fafard Real Estate Development Corp. ® Name Name 75 Canal Street 290 Eliot Street Mailing Address Mailing Address Salem MA 01970 Ashland MA 01721 City/Town State Zip Code City/Town State Zip Code 1. Project Location: Technology Way & Swampscott Road Salem street Address City/Town Map 7 Lot 63 Assessors Map/Plat Number Parcel/Lot Number 2. Property recorded at the Registry of Deeds for: Essex NA NA County Book Page 54812 (Land Court Parcel) Certificate(if registered land) 3. Dates: Amended 1/23/97, 4/13/95, 4/12/01 —Extended 11/20/98, 11/20/01, 11/20/02 10/30/87 9/8/88 9/8/88 Date Notice of Intent Filed Date Public Hearing Closed Date of Issuance 4. Final Approved Plans and Other Documents (attach additional plan references as needed): "Site Development Permit Plan for the Salem Glass Company, Inc. Proposed 2/27/01 Corporate Office and Manufacturing Facility in Salem, Ma" Sheets 1-5 Revised 3/5/01 5. Final Plans and Documents Signed and Stamped by: Christopher R. Mello Name 6. Total Fee: NA (from Appendix B:Wetland Fee Transmittal Form) Page 1 of 7 WPA Forth 5 Rev.02/00 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection DEP File Number: Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands 64-152 WPA Form 5 - Order of Conditions Provided by DEP Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 w B. Findings Findings pursuant to the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act: Following the review of the above-referenced Notice of Intent and based on the information provided in this application and presented at the public hearing, this Commission finds that the areas in which work is proposed is significant to the following interests of the Wetlands Protection Act. Check all that apply: ❑ Public Water Supply ❑ Land Containing Shellfish ® Prevention of Pollution ❑ Private Water Supply ❑ Fisheries ® Protection of Wildlife Habitat ® Groundwater Supply ❑ Storm Damage Prevention ❑ Flood Control Furthermore,this Commission hereby finds the project, as proposed, is:(check one of the following boxes) Approved subject to: ® the following conditions which are necessary, in accordance with the performance standards set forth in the wetlands regulations, to protect those interests checked above. This Commission orders that all work shall be performed in accordance with the Notice of Intent referenced above, the following General Conditions, and any other special conditions attached to this Order. To the extent that the following conditions modify or differ from the plans, specifications, or other proposals submitted with the Notice of Intent, these conditions shall control. Denied because: ❑ the proposed work cannot be conditioned to meet the performance standards set forth in the wetland regulations to protect those interests checked above. Therefore,work on this project may not go forward unless and until a new Notice of Intent is submitted which provides measures which are adequate to protect these interests, and a final Order of Conditions is issued. ❑ the information submitted by the applicant is not sufficient to describe the site,the work, or the effect of the work on the interests identified in the Wetlands Protection Act. Therefore, work on this project may not go forward unless and until a revised Notice of Intent is submitted which provides sufficient information and includes measures which are adequate to protect the Act's interests, and a final Order of Conditions is issued. A description of the specific information which is lacking and why it is necessary is attached to this Order as per 310 CMR 10.05(6)(c). General Conditions (only applicable to approved projects) 1. Failure to comply with all conditions stated herein, and with all related statutes and other regulatory measures, shall be deemed cause to revoke or modify this Order. 2. The Order does not grant any property rights or any exclusive privileges; it does not authorize any injury to private property or invasion of private rights. 3. This Order does not relieve the permittee or any other person of the necessity of complying with all other applicable federal, state, or local statutes, ordinances, bylaws, or regulations. Page 2 of 7 WPA Fort 5 Rev.02100 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection DEP File"umber: Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands 64-152 WPA Form 5 - Order of Conditions Provided by DEP Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 B. Findings (cont.) 4. The work authorized hereunder shall be completed within three years from the date of this Order unless either of the following apply: a. the work is a maintenance dredging project as provided for in the Act; or b. the time for completion has been extended to a specified date more than three years, but less than five years, from the date of issuance. If this Order is intended to be valid for more than three years, the extension date and the special circumstances warranting the extended time period are set forth as a special condition in this Order. 5. This Order may be extended by the issuing authority for one or more periods of up to three years each upon application to the issuing authority at least 30 days prior to the expiration date of the Order. 6. Any fill used in connection with this project shall be clean fill. Any fill shall contain no trash, refuse, rubbish, or debris, including but not limited to lumber, bricks, plaster,wire, lath, paper, cardboard, pipe, tires, ashes, refrigerators, motor vehicles, or parts of any of the foregoing. 7. This Order is not final until all administrative appeal periods from this Order have elapsed, or if such an appeal has been taken, until all proceedings before the Department have been completed. 8. No work shall be undertaken until the Order has become final and then has been recorded in the Registry of Deeds or the Land Court for the district in which the land is located,within the chain of title of the affected property. In the case of recorded land, the Final Order shall also be noted in the Registry's Grantor Index under the name of the owner of the land upon which the proposed work is to be done. In the case of the registered land, the Final Order shall also be noted on the Land Court Certificate of Title of the owner of the land upon which the proposed work is done. The recording information shall be submitted to this Conservation Commission on the form at the end of this Order, which form must be stamped by the Registry of Deeds, prior to the commencement of work. 9. A sign shall be displayed at the site not less then two square feet or more than three square feet in size bearing the words, "Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection" [or, "MA DEP"] "File Number 64-152 " 10. Where the Department of Environmental Protection is requested to issue a Superseding Order, the Conservation Commission shall be a party to all agency proceedings and hearings before DEP. 11. Upon completion of the work described herein, the applicant shall submit a Request for Certificate of Compliance (WPA Form 8A)to the Conservation Commission. 12. The work shall conform to the plans and special conditions referenced in this order. 13. Any change to the plans identified in Condition #12 above shall require the applicant to inquire of the Conservation Commission in writing whether the change is significant enough to require the filing of a new Notice of Intent. 14. The Agent or members of the Conservation Commission and the Department of Environmental Protection shall have the right to enter and inspect the area subject to this Order at reasonable hours to evaluate compliance with the conditions stated in this Order, and may require the submittal of any data deemed necessary by the Conservation Commission or Department for that evaluation. Page 3 of 7 WPA Forth 5 Rev.07/00 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection DEP File Number: Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands 64-152 WPA Form 5 - Order of Conditions Provided by DEP Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 B. Findings (cont.) 15. This Order of Conditions shall apply to any successor in interest or successor in control of the property subject to this Order and to any contractor or other person performing work conditioned by this Order. 16. Prior to the start of work, and if the project involves work adjacent to a Bordering Vegetated Wetland, the boundary of the wetland in the vicinity of the proposed work area shall be marked by wooden stakes or flagging. Once in place, the wetland boundary markers shall be maintained until a Certificate of Compliance has been issued by the Conservation Commission. 17. All sedimentation barriers shall be maintained in good repair until all disturbed areas have been fully stabilized with vegetation or other means. At no time shall sediments be deposited in a wetland or water body. During construction, the applicant or his/her designee shall inspect the erosion controls on a daily basis and shall remove accumulated sediments as needed. The applicant shall immediately control any erosion problems that occur at the site and shall also immediately notify the Conservation Commission,which reserves the right to require additional erosion and/or damage prevention controls it may deem necessary. Sedimentation barriers shall serve as the limit of work unless another limit of work line has been approved by this Order. Special Conditions (use additional paper, if necessary): See Attached Findings as to municipal bylaw or ordinance Furthermore, the hereby finds (check one that applies): Conservation Commission ❑ that the proposed work cannot be conditioned to meet the standards set forth in a municipal ordinance or bylaw specifically: Name Municipal Ordinance or Bylaw Therefore,work on this project may not go forward unless and until a revised Notice of Intent is submitted which provides measures which are adequate to meet these standards, and a final Order of Conditions is issued. ❑ that the following additional conditions are necessary to comply with a municipal ordinance or bylaw, specifically: Name Municipal Ordinance or Bylaw The Commission orders that all work shall be performed in accordance with the said additional conditions and with the Notice of Intent referenced above. To the extent that the following conditions modify or differ from the plans, specifications, or other proposals submitted with the Notice of Intent, the conditions shall control. WPA Form 5 Page 4 of 7 Rev.02/00 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection DEP File Number. Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands 64-152 WPA Form 5 - Order of Conditions Provided by DEP Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 B. Findings (cont.) Additional conditions relating to municipal ordinance or bylaw: This Order is valid for three years, unless otherwise specified as a special condition pursuant to General Conditions#4, from the date of issuance. This Amended Order of Conditions will expire on November 20, 2002 Date This Order must be signed by a majority of the Conservation Commission. The Order must be mailed by certified mail (return receipt requested)or hand delivered to the applicant. A copy also must be mailed or hand delivered at the same time to the appropriate Department of Environmental Protection Regional Office(see Appendix A)and the property owner(if different from appiicant). Si natures: e I.cJLv✓D Of Dp 7�d \ Day Month land Year before me personally appeared to known to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and ack. o ledged tha sh execu d the same as his/her free act and deed. ary Public My Comm' ion Expires This Order is issued to the applica as follows: ❑ by hand delivery on 0,'by certified mail, return receipt requested,on �pc;\ Date De WPA F=5 Pep 007 Rev.02100 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection DEP File Number: Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands 64-152 WPA Form 5 - Order of Conditions Provided by DEP rr Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 C. Appeals The applicant, the owner, any person aggrieved by this Order, any owner of land abutting the land subject to this Order, or any ten residents of the city or town in which such land is located, are hereby notified of their right to request the appropriate DEP Regional Office to issue a Superseding Order of Conditions. The request must be made by certified mail or hand delivery to the Department, with the appropriate filing fee and a completed Appendix E: Request of Departmental Action Fee Transmittal Form, as provided in 310 CMR 10.03(7)within ten business days from the date of issuance of this Order. A copy of the request shall at the same time be sent by certified mail or hand delivery to the Conservation Commission and to the applicant, if he/she is not the appellant. The request shall state clearly and concisely the objections to the Order which is being appealed and how the Order does not contribute to the protection of the interests identified in the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act, (M.G.L. c. 131, §40)and is inconsistent with the wetlands regulations (310 CMR 10.00). To the extent that the Order is based on a municipal ordinance or bylaw, and not on the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act or regulations, the Department has no appellate jurisdiction. D. Recording Information This Order of Conditions must be recorded in the Registry of Deeds or the Land Court for the district in which the land is located,within the chain of title of the affected property. In the case of recorded land, the Final Order shall also be noted in the Registry's Grantor Index under the name of the owner of the land subject to the Order. In the case of registered land, this Order shall also be noted on the Land Court Certificate of Title of the owner of the land subject to the Order of Conditions.The recording information on Page 7 of Form 5 shall be submitted to the Conservation Commission listed below. Salem Conservation Commission WPA Form 5 Page 6 of 7 Rev.OMO Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection DEP File"umber: Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands 64-152 WPA Form 5 — Order of Conditions Provided by DEP Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 D. Recording Information (cont.) Detach on dotted line, have stamped by the Registry of Deeds and submit to the Conservation Commission. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ To: Salem Conservation Commission Please be advised that the Order of Conditions for the Project at: Project Location DEP File Number Has been recorded at the Registry of Deeds of: County Book Page for: Property Owner and has been noted in the chain of title of the affected property in: Book Page In accordance with the Order of Conditions issued on: Date If recorded land, the instrument number identifying this transaction is: Instrument Number If registered land, the document number identifying this transaction is: Document Number Signature of Applicant Page 7 of 7 WPA Forth 5 Rev.07/DO Salem Conservation Commission SPECIAL CONDITIONS—DEP FILE # 64-152 (Amended) Salem Glass, Technology Way, Salem,MA 1. The Conservation Agent will be notified 48 hours prior to commencement of construction activities(978-745- 9595 ext. 311). Members and agents of the Salem Conservation Commission(Commission)shall have the right to enter and inspect the premises to evaluate and ensure compliance with the conditions and performance standards stated in this Order,the Notice of Intent,the referenced plans,the Act,and 310 CMR 10.00,and may require any information,measurements,photographs,observation and/or materials or may require the submittal of any data or information deemed necessary by the Commission, agent,or DEP determines that any of the work is not in compliance with this Order of Conditions. Work shall not resume until the Commission is satisfied that the work will comply, and has so notified the applicant in writing. 2. Approval of this application does not constitute compliance with any law or regulation other than MGL Chapter 131,Section 40, and Wetlands Regulations 310 CMR 10.00. 3. This Order shall apply to any successor in control or successor in interest of the property described in the Notice of Intent and accompanying plans. These obligations shall be expressed in covenants in all deeds to succeeding owners or portions of the property. 4. The form provided at the end of this Order shall be completed and stamped at the Registry of Deeds after the expiration of the 10-day appeal period and within 30 days of the issuance if no request for appeal has been filed with the Department of Environmental Protection. This form shall be returned to the Commission within 21 days of recording accordance and prior to commencement of any activities subject to the Order of Conditions. 5. Prior to any work commencing,a sign shall be displayed showing DEP file#64-152,and not placed on a living tree. 6. The term"Applicant'as used in this Order of Conditions shall refer to the owner,any successor in interest or successor in control of the property referenced in the Notice of Intent,supporting documents and this Order of Conditions. The Commission shall be notified in writing within 30 days of all transfers of title of any portion of the property that takes place prior to issuance of the Certificate of Compliance. 7. It is the responsibility of the applicant to procure all other applicable federal, state and local permits and approvals associated with this project. These permits may include but are not necessarily limited to the following: (1) Section 404 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act(P.L.92-500,86 stat. 816),U.S.Army Corp of Engineers. (2) Water Quality Certification in accordance with the Federal Water Pollution Control under authority of sec. 27(5)of Chapter 21 of the Massachusetts General Laws as codified (3) Flood Plain (4) Grading Ordinance 8. If there are conflicting conditions within this Order,the stricter condition(s)shall rule. 9. All work shall be performed so as to ensure that there will be no sedimentation into wetlands and surface waters during construction or after completion of the project. 10. The Commission and its Administrator shall have the discretion to modify the erosion/siltation control methods and boundary during construction if necessary. 11. All work shall be performed in accordance with this Order of Conditions and approved site plans(s). No alteration of wetland resource areas or associated buffer zone,other than that approved in this Order,shall occur on this property without prior approval from the Commission. 12. If any changes are made in the above-described plan(s)which may or will alter an area subject to protection under the Wetlands Protection Act, or any changes in activity subject to regulations under G.L. Ch. 131, Section 40,the applicant shall inquire from this Commission in writing,prior to their implementation in the field, whether the change(s)is significant enough to require the filing of a new Notice of Intent. Any error in the plans or information submitted by the applicant shall be considered changes and the above procedures shall be followed. A copy of such request shall at the same time be sent to the Department of Environmental Protection. 13. In conjunction with the sale of this property or any portion thereof before a Certificate of Compliance has been issued,the applicant or current landowner shall submit to the Commission a signed statement by the buyer that he/she is aware of an outstanding Order of Conditions on the property and has received a copy of the Order of Conditions. 14. Conditions number 45 &47 as indicated shall continue in force beyond the Certificate of Compliance,in perpetuity, and shall be referred to in all future deeds to this property. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION 15. Prior to commencement of any activity on this site,there shall be a PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING between the project supervision;the contractor responsible for the work or its administrator to and phone numbers of all responsible parties shall be registered with the Commission at the pre-construction meeting. 16. Prior to the pre-construction meeting and commencement of any activity on this site, sedimentation and erosion control barriers shall be installed as shown on the approval plan(s)and detail drawings. The Commssion and/or its Administrator shall inspect and approve such installation at the pre-construction meeting. 17. Prior to the commencement of any activity on this site,the applicant or current landowner shall submit to the Commission in writing a construction schedule/sequence of work to complete this project. 18. Prior to any work on site,the proposed limits of work shall be clearly marked with stakes or flags and shall be confirmed by the Commission or its Administrator. Such markers shall be checked and replaced as necessary and shall be maintained until all construction is complete. Workers shall be informed that no use of machinery, storage of machinery or materials, stockpiling of soil or construction activity is to occur beyond this line at anytime. 19. Prior to commencement of construction on site,the limits of wetland resource areas closest to construction activity shall be flagged with surveyor's tape and shall remain in place during construction. The limits of areas to be impacted and the limits of work in the replication area(s)shall be clearly flagged. 20. There shall be 30 hay bales and wooden staked stored under cover on the site to be used only for emergency erosion control EROSION CONTROL 21. Appropriate erosion control devices shall be in place prior to the beginning of any phases of construction,and shall be maintained during construction in the wetland areas and buffer zones. The erosion control specification provided in the Notice of Intent and the erosion control provision in the Order will be the minimum standards for this project;additional measures may be required by the Commission. 22. All debris,fill and excavated material shall be stockpiled a location far enough away from the wetland resource areas to prevent sediment from entering wetland resource areas. 23. Erosion and sedimentation control devices shall be inspected after each storm event and repaired or replaced as necessary. Any accumulated silt adjacent to the barriers shall be removed. 24. The areas of construction shall remain in a stable condition at the close of each construction day. 25. Any de-watering of trenches or other excavations required during construction shall be conducted so as to prevent siltation of wetland resource areas. All discharges from de-watering activities shall be filtered through haybale sediment traps, silt filter bags or other means approved by the Commission or its Administrator. 26. Within thirty days of completion of construction on any given portion of the project, all disturbed areas in the completed portion of the site shall be permanently stabilized with rapidly growing vegetative cover,using sufficient top soil to assure long-term stabilization of disturbed areas. 27. If soils are to be disturbed for longer than two months,a temporary cover of rye or other grass should be established to prevent erosion and sedimentation. If the season is not appropriate for plant growth,exposed surfaces shall be stabilized by other appropriate erosion control measures,firmly anchored,to prevent soils from being washed by rain or flooding. DURING CONSTRUCTION 28. A copy of the Order of Conditions,construction plans, and copies of the documents and reports cited in Condition# 11, shall be on the site upon commencement and during any site work for contractors to view and adhere to. 29. Erosion and sedimentation control devices shall be inspected after each storm event and repaired or replaced as necessary. Any accumulated silt adjacent to the barriers shall be removed. 30. Only clean fill,free of masonry,stumps,asphalt, and any other kind of waste material shall be used on the site. 31. All waste products,grubbed stumps,slash,construction materials,etc.shall be deposited at least 100 feet from wetland resource areas and 200 feet from rivers. 32. All filling or removal of waste material from the site shall be done in accordance with the regulations of the City of Salem Health Department. 33. Cement trucks shall not be washed out in any wetland resource or buffer zone area. Any deposit of cement or concrete products into a buffer zone or wetland resource area shall be removed by hand. 34. No fuel,oil,or other pollutants shall be stored in any resource area or the buffer zone thereto,unless specified in this Order of Conditions. 35. There shall be no pumping of water from wetland resource areas. 36. During construction,all drainage structures shall be inspected regularly and cleaned as necessary. 37. The project shall not cause an increase in run-off onto adjacent properties,either during construction or when completed. 38. The applicant is hereby notified that failure to comply with all requirements herein may result in the issuance of enforcement actions by the Conservation Commission including,but not limited to,civil administrative penalties under M.G.L. Chapter 21A,section 16. POST CONSTRUCTION 39. All disturbed areas,slopes and proposed landscape areas shall be loamed and seeded or stabilized through the use of erosion control blankets or other approved means. All disturbed areas will be graded,loamed,and seeded prior to November 1 of each year,if possible. No disturbed areas or stockpiled material will be left unprotected or without erosion controls during the winter. 4 40. Upon completion of construction, the applicant or current landowner shall submit the following to the Commission to request a Certificate of Compliance: (1) A letter requesting a Certificate including the following information: a. Name and address of current landowner; b. Name and address of the individual/trust or other entity to whom the Certificate is to be issued: c. Street address and lot number for the project;and d. DEP file number (2) A letter from a Registered Professional Engineering or Land Surveyor certifying compliance of the property with this Order of Conditions (3) An"As-Built'plan signed and stamped by a Registered Professional Engineer showing post-construction conditions and: a. As-built elevations of all drainage ways constructed within 100 feet of any wetland resource area; b. As-built elevations and grades of all filled or altered wetland resource areas,buffer zones and replicated areas;and c. Distances to all structures within 100 feet of any wetland resource area. 41. When issued,the Certificate of Compliance must be recorded at the Essex County Registry of Deeds. 42. If the completed work differs from that in the original plans and conditions,the report must specify how the work differs;at which time the applicant shall first request a modification to the Order. Only upon review and approval by the Commission,may the applicant request in writing a Certificate of Compliance as described above. 43. Erosion control devices shall remain in place and properly functioning until all exposed soils have been stabilized with final vegetative cover and the Commission and/or its Administrator has authorized their removal. ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS 44. Work shall conform to the referenced plans. 45. No salt or chemical shall be used as a de-icing agent within the parking lot area except for minimal use along the sidewalks. 46. An Operation and Maintenance Plan shall be submitted to the Conservation Commission prior to the commencement of work. 47. The majority of snow storage shall be located at the far west comer of the site. 48. Gas traps shall be installed in all catch basins. 49. Receipt and approval of Environmental Impact Report from EDEA. 50. 1. Slope rip rap along N.E. edge of parking lot;2.Installation of granite curb along entire Easterly side of parking lot from Technology Way to Southerly limits of pavement;3.Establish a no cut zone between the pavement and wetland line and require 1 to 1 species replacement of plants lost due to construction of rip rap or pavement(Amendment from 4/13/95). a For. 5 DEGE Re No. 6 4-15 2 (TO be orovweo oy OEGE) �S SALEM Commonwealth CitWTe,,, Fl�gl of Massachusetts orf ENDED Aop,Cynt The Fafard Companies 1-23--97 AMENDED 4-13-95 Order of Conditions Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act G.L c. 131, §40 From Salem Conservation Commission To The Fafard Companies SAME (Name of Applicant) (Name of propertyownerl Address 290 Eliot Street, Ashland, MA 0le7s' SAME This Order is issued and delivered as follows: ❑ by hand delivery to applicant or representative on (d8tel El by certified mad.return receipt requested on September 26. 1988 (date) This project m located at Lot 63, Map 7, Swampscott Road South Essex The orooerty is recorded at the Registry of NA NA BOOK Page Certificate(if regnteredl 54812 (Land Court Parcel) 10/30/87 The Notice of Intent for this project was filed on (date) The public hearing was closea an September 8. 1988 (date) Findings The rn*nr7cST(1N -has reweweathe above-referencedNotice at Intent and pians and has hell a public hearing on the project.eased on the information available to the COMMISSION at this time.the COMMISSION has determined that the area on which the proposed work is to be done is significant to the following interests m accordance with the Presumptions of Significance set forth in the regulations for each Area Subject to Protection Under the Act(Check as appropriate): ® Public water supply ® Flood control ❑ Land containing shellfish ® Private water supply ® Storm damage prevention ❑ Fisheries Ground water supply ® Prevention of pollution ❑ Protection of wildlife habitat 5.1 -- 1 Therefore. the COMMISSION hereby rinds that the following conditions are necessary,in accordance with the Performance Standards set forth in the regulations, to protect those inter- ests checked above. The COMMISSION oroers that all work shall be pertortned in accordance with said conditions and with the Notice of Intent referencea above. To the extent that the fol- lowing condition modify or differ from the plants. specifications or other proposals submitted with the Notice of Intent.the conaliki ns shall control. General Conditlona 1. Faure to coinpty with es conditions stated herein.and with all related statutes and other regulatory metra- urea.shall be deemed cause to revoke or modify this Order. 2. This Order does not grant any property rights or my exclusive privileges:it does not authorize any injury to private property or invasion of private rights. 3. This Order does not relieve the permittee or any other person of the necessity of camp"with ail other epptivarble federal.state or local stalutes.ordinances.by-laws or regulations. a. The work audiefQed herelmtler shall be completed within three years from the date of this Order unless either of the following apply: (a) the work is a rtmnttenanee dredging project as provided for in the Act:or (b) the time for completion has been ex Of ed to a specified date more than three years.but less than rive years.from the date of issuance and both that date and the special circumstances warranting the extended time period are set forth kn this Order. 5. This Order may be extended by the issuing authority for one or more periods of up to three years each upon application to the issuing authority at feast 30 days pnor to the expiation date of the Order. 6. Any fill used in connection with this project shad be clean fill,containing no trash.refuse. rubbish or de- bris.including but not limited to lumber, bricks.plaster.wire. lath. paper.cardboard. pipe, tires.ashes. refrigerators, motor vehicles or parts of any of the foregoing. 7 No work shall be undertaken until all administrative appeal periods from this Order nave elaosea or. it Such an appeal has been tiled. until all proceedings before the Department have been completed. 8. No work shall be undertaken until the Final Order has been recorded in the Registry of Deeds or the Land Court for the district in which the land is located.within the chain of title of the affected property. In the case of recorded land.the Final Order shall also be noted in the Registry's Grantor Index under the name of the owner of the land upon which the proposed work is to be done. In the case of registered lana. the Final Order shall also be noted on the Land Court Certificate of Title of the owner of the land upon which the proposed work is to be done. The recording information shall be submitted to the COMMISSION on the form at the end of this Order pnor to commencement of the worn. 9. A sign shall be displayed at the site not less than two square feet or more than three square feet in size bearing the words fi M lesss2achusetts Department of Environmental Ouafify Engineenng, Pile Number 10. Where the Department of Environmental Quality Engineenng is requested to make a determination and to issue a Superseding Order, the Conservation Commission shall be a parry to all agency proceedings and hearings before the Department. 1 1. Upon completion of the work descnbed herein, the applicant shall forthwith request in wndng that a Certificate of Compliance be issued stating that the work has been satnsfactonly completed. 12. The work shall conform to the following plana and special conditions: 5.2 i 11. upon completion of the work described herein, the applicant shall forthwith request in writing that a certificate of compliance be issued stating that the work has been satisfactorily completed. 12. The work shall conform to the following plans and special conditions: . 3. Industrial Condominiums at Salem Business Park, dated 30 December, 1996, Plans: Fafard Real Estate, on file with Salem Conservation Commission Title Dated signed and stamped by: on File with: 1 "Lavout Plans for Thermal Circuits in Salem,, MA" , dated March 20 , 1995 , revised April 18 , 1995 , containing sheets 1-.3 , prepared by Fafard Real Estate and Deb . Corp . , 290 Eliot Street , Ashland , MA 01721. Salem Conservation Commissi 95 , 2 . "Definitive Plan of Land in Salem, MA" dated March 24 , 1995 , revised 4'o8/Eliot c o n t a i�4E 1 Pr a r$a—ice— m.a.aa—n,. i �s ,. Street , Ashland , MA 01721 Salem Conservation Commissi Special Conditions (use additional paper if necessary) 1 . Work shall conforma to abbve referenced plans . 2 . Anv_ changes in builing sites or building sizes shall require, an '.amendment t to the Order of Conditions . 3 . No salt shall be used as, a de-icing agent . 4 . Prior to construction , staked hav_ bales shall be installed to protect the nearbv wetlands . 5 . Gas trans shall be installed in catch basins . 6 . Receipt and approval of Environmental Imnace Renort from EDEA. 7 . Conservation Commission members and/or their desinated agents reserve the right to enter and inspect the site during construction . ' 8 . As-built plans stamped by a Registered Professional Engineer , shall be submitted to the Commission prior to the issuance of a Certificate of compliance . 9. Plan 113, referenced above, shall be amended to require 1. slope rip rap along N.E. edge of parking lot, 2. installation of granite curb along entire Easterly side of parking lot from Technology Way to Southerly limits of pavement, 3. establish a no cut zone between pavement and wetland line and require 1 to 1 s ci replacement of plants lost due to construction of rip rap or pavemeAPeave space pBgan�C�. . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . 5-3A Plane: Title Dated Signed and Stamped by: On File with: special Conditions (vee additional paper if necessary) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Leave. space Blank). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . ... 5-3B r ' a Issued By SA E conservation commission Signatur {s) This order must be signed by a majority of the conservation commission. On this 13TH day of n ; i 19 95 , before me personally appeared the Commission , to me known to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she executed the same as his/her free act and deed. Notary Public My commission expires The applicant, the owner, any person agrrieved by this order, any owner of land abutting the land upon which the proposed work is to be done, or any ten residents of the city or town in which such land is located, are hereby notified of their right to request the Department of Envirormmtal protection to issue a Superseding Order, providing the request is mete by certified mail or hard delivery to the Department, with the appropriate filing fee and Fee Transmittal Form as provided in 310 CMR 10.03(7), within ten days from the date of issuance of this determination. A copy of the request shall at the sane time be sent by certified mail or hard delivery to the Conservation commission and the applicant. Detach an dotted line end submit to the S a1 Pm rgior to commencement of work. ............................................................... .............................................. Issuing Authority To Please be advised that the order of Conditions for the project at File Number has been recorded at the Registry of end has been noted in the chain of title of the affected property in accordance with General Condition N on ,19 If recorded lard, the instrument number which identifies this transaction is If regiatered lard, the document number which identifies this transaction is Applicant Signature 5-4A Issued by the Department of Environmental Protection Signature On this day of 19 before me personally appeared to me known to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she executed the same as his/her free act and deed. Notary Public my commission expires The applicant, the owner, any person aggrieved by the Superseding Order, any owner of lard abutting the land upon which the proposed work is to,be done, or any ten persons pursuant to G.L. c.30A 110A, are hereby notified of their right to request•en adjudicatory hearing pursuant to G.L. c.30A, 410, providing the request is made by certified aril or hand delivery to the Department, with the appropriate filing fee and Fee Transmittal Form as provided in 310 CHR 10.03(7), within ten days from the date of issuance of this Superseding Order, and is addressed to: Docket Clerk, Office of General Cou eel, Department of Environmental Protection, one Winter Street, Boston, HA 02108. A copy of the request shall at the same time be sent by certified me(l or hard delivery to the Conservation Commission, the applicant, and any other party. A Notice of Claim for an Adjudicatory Nearing shall comply with the Department's Rules for Adjudicatory Proceedings, 310 CHR 1.01(6), and shell contain the following information: (a) the DEP Wetlands File Number, new of the applicant and address of the project; (b) the complete name, address and telephone amber of the party filing the request, and, if represented by counsel, the name and address of the attorney; (c) the names and addresses of all other parties, if known; (d) a clear and concise statement of (1) the facts which are grounds for the proceedings, (2) the objections to this Superseding Order, including specifics lly the manner in which it is alleged to be inconsistent with the Department's Wetlands Regulations (310 CHR 10.00) and does net contribute to the protection of the interests identified in the Act, and (3) the relief sought through the adjudicatory hearing, including specifically the changes desired in the Superseding Order.- (0) rder;(e) a statement that a copy of the request has been sent th to the applicant, the conservation commission and each other party or representative of such party„ if Failure to submit all necessary information may result in a dismissal by the Department of the Notice of Claim for an Adjudicatory Nearing. Detach on dotted tiro and submit to the prior to commencement of work. -............................................................................................................ To Issuing Authority. Please be advised that the Order of Conditions for the project-at File Number I has been recorded at the Registry of and has been noted in the chain of title of the affected property in accordance with General Condition 8 on 19 If recorded land, the instrument rmamber which identifies this transaction is if registered land, the document amber which identifies this'transaction is Signature Applicant 5-41) 05/10/95 03=27 Inst 227 K 15011--11 PG :23 Form 5 0EGE File No. i 6 4-15 2 Vt i (To be arawmea by DEOE1 .,� Commonwealth clivif iwi SALEM of Massaenusetts AppiiearK The Fafard Companies AMENDED 4-13-95 Order of Conditions Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act G.L c. 1319 §40 From Salem Conservation Commission To The Fafard Companies SAME (Name of Aoti tcam) (Name of property owne►f Address 290 Eliot Street, Ashland, MA Ol ��s' SAME This Order is issued and delivered as follows: ❑ by hand delivery to applicant or representative on (datal n by certified mad.return receipt requested on September 26 1988 (date) This Project islocated at Lot 63, Map 7, Swampscott Road South Essex The property is recbraed at the Registry of NA NA BOOK Page Certificate tit regtatereal 54812 (Land Court Parcel) 10/30/87 _ The Notice of Intent for this arotect was filed an (date) The public hearing was closea on September 8. 1988 (date) Findings The rntiMTccmn* has reviewed the acove-reterenced Notice of Intent and plans and has neld a public hearing on the protect.easea an the information available to the COMMISSION at this time. the COMMISSION has determined that the area an which the proposed work is to be done is signdicant to the following interests inaccerdance with the Presumptions of Significance set forth in the regulations for each Area Subject to Protection Under the Act(check as appropriate): ® Public water supply ® Flood control ❑ Land containing shellfish ® Private water supply ® Storm damage prevention ❑ Fisheries CJ Grouna water supply ® Prevention of pollution ❑ Protection of wiidlife habitat 5.1 is \ Bib. 13016 PIG is � '2ff 33 ��` Therefore. the COMMISSION ^ereov tines tnat the following conditions are necessary,In accordance With the Performance Standards set forth in the regulations. to protect those Inter• ests checked above. The COMMISSION grcers that ail wort shall be performed in accordance with said conditions and with the Notice or Intent referenced above. To the extent that the fol- lowing conditions modrfy or differ from the plans. specifications or ocher proposals submitted with the Notice of Intent. the conditions shall control General Conditions 1. Fak re to campy with all conditions stated herein.and with all related statutes and other regulatory meas. units.small be deemed cause to revoke or modify this Order. 2. This Order co=not gram,any property rights or any excti>sr:a dhvilegew it dorms not autnorze any injury to private property or invasion of private rights. 3. This Order does not relieve ate permittee or any other person of the necessity,at complying with ail other aepreable federal.state or local statutes.ordinances, by-laws or regulations. 4. The work euWonzed hereunder snag be completed within three years from the date of this Order unless either of the following appy: (a) the work is a maintenance dredging protect as provided for in the Act:or (b) the time for cohmletidn has been extended to a specified date more than three years. but less than five years.from the date of issuance and both that date and the special circumstances warranting Me extended time period are set forth in this Order. 5. This Order may be extended by the issuing authority for one or more periods of up to three years each upon application to the issuing authority at least 30 days prior to the excitation date of the Order. 6. Any fill used in connection with this project shall be clean tiff.comaininq no trash,refuse.rubbish or de- bris, including but not limited to lumber.bricks,plaster.wire. tach. paper. caroboard.pipe. tires. ashes. refrigerators.motor vehicles or parts of any of the foregoing. 7 No wort stead be undertaken until all administrative aoceal deriods tram tnis Order nave elapsed or. it such an appeal rias been tiled.until all proceedings before the Department have been comoleted. 8. No work small be undertaken until the Final Order nas been recorded in the Regmtry at Deeds or the land Court far the district in which the land is located.within the cnain of tide of the affected property. In the case of recorded land.the Final Order shad also be noted in the Registry's Grantor Index under the name of the owner of the land upon which the proposed work is to be done. in the case of registered land. the Final Order snail also be noted on the land Court Certificate of Title of the owner of the land upon which the proposed work is to be done. The recording information small be submitted to the COMMISSION on the form at the end of this Order pndr to commencement of the worx. 9. A sign shad be displayed at the site not less than two square feet or more than three square feet in size bearing the wants. "Massachusetts-152 Department of Environmental Quality Engineering, File Number 10.Where the Department of Environmental Quality Engineering is requested to make a determination and to issue a Superseding Order. the Conservation Commission snail be a party to all agency proceedings and hearings before the Department. t t . Upon completion of the work described herein, the applicant small forthwith request in writing that a Certificate of Compliance be issued stating that the work has been satisfactorily completed. 12. The wort shad conform to the following plans and special conditions: ' • I t Y Bl( 13016 FIG "224 11. upon completion of the work described herein, the applicant shall forthwith request in writing that a certificate of compliance be issued stating that the work has been satisfactorily completed. 12. The work shall conform to the following plane and special conditions: Planet Title Dated Signed and Stamped by: on File with: 1 "Layout Plans for Thermal Circuits in Salem, MA" , dated March 20 , 1995 , revised April 18 , 1995 , containing sheets 1-3 , prepared by Fafard Real Estate and Dev . Corp . , 290 ,EliOt Street , Ashland , MA 01721 . Salem Conservation Commissic 2 . "Definitive Plan of Land in Salem, MA" dated March 24 , 1995 , revised 4/18/95 , �� lt.ar .. pan Eliot contai Salem Conservation Commissic Street , Ashland , MA 01721 . Special conditions (use additional paper if necessary) 1 . Work shall conforma to abbve referenced plans.. 2 . Anv changes in builing sites or building sizes shall require, an amendment t to the Order of Conditions . 3 . No salt shall be used as a de-icing anent . 4 . Prior to construction , staked havbales shall be installed to protect the nearby wetlands . 5 . Cas traps shall be installed in catch basins . port from EDEA. 6 . Receint and approvalRe of Environmental Imnace _. 7 . Conservation Commission members and/or their designated agents reserve the right to enter and inspect the site during construction . ' 8 . As-built plans stamped by a Registered Professional Engineer , shall be submitted to the Commission prior to the issuance of a Certificate of compliance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ( . . . . . Space• Blank). . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . 5-3A Plana: Title Dated signed and stamped by: on File with: special conditions (Use additional paper if necessary) LAK 1 "016 PG 2".195 (Leave space Blank) . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... 5-3B r ig+' q y 1 B 130119 P§ 286 Issued By SALE conservation commission Signature(s) — �. This Order must be signed by a majority of the Conservation commission. On this 13TH day of A ' T 19 95 , before me personally appeared the Commission , to me known to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she executed the same as his/her free act and deed. Notary Public My commission expires The applicant, the owner, any person sgrrieved by this Order, any owner of land abutting the land upon which the proposed work is to be done, or any ten residents of the city or town in which such land is located, are hereby notified of their right to request the Department of Environmental protection to issue a Superseding Order, providing the request is made by certified nail or hand delivery to the Department, with the appropriate filing fee and Fee Transmittal Form as provided in 310 CXR 10.03(7), within ten days from the date of issuance of this determination. A Copy of the request shall at the same time be sent by certified mail or hand delivery to the Conservation Commission and the applicant. Detach on dotted line and albeit to the Sat a t' Dior to commencement of work. .......................................................................................... Issuing Authority TO Please be advised that the Order of Conditions for the project at Ftle Number has been recorded at the Registry of and hes been noted in the Chain of title of the affected property in accordance with General Condition 8 on tv if recorded land, the instrument number which identifies this transaction is if registered land, the document number which identifies this transaction is Applicant Signature 5-4A is 1 •1 i Issued by the Department of Environmental Protection y Signature On this day of 19 before me per \\nally appeared to me kn.wn to be the person desctibed in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that a/she executed the same as his/her free/act and deed. j i Notary Public My commission expires The applicant, the owner, arty pers aggrieved by the superssdinnp/o�da r, any owner of laid abutting the land upon which the pressed work is to, done, or any ten persons p6rauant to G.L. c30A JIOA, are hereby notified of their right to request`on judicatory hearing pur cant to G.L. c.30A, 510, providing the request is made by certified mail or h delivery to the De�tnent, with the appropriate tiling fee end Fes Trensmittal Form as provided in 310 R 10.03(7), withfyn ten days from the date of issuance of this Superseding Order, and is addressed to: D ket Clerk, Otf'.Ee of General Counsel, Department of Envirotmntat Protection, One Winter street, Boston, MA 2108. A cop of the request shall at the same time be sent by certified mail or hand delivery to the Cons vation C7mission, the applicant, and any other party. A Notice of Claim for an Adjudicatory Nearing all comply with the Department's Rules for Adjudicatory Proceedings, 310 CMR 1.01(6), and shell contain he'following information: (a) the DEP Wetlands File Nudger, new of thea I licant and address of the project; (b) the complete name, address and telephone of the party filing the request, and, if represented by counsel, the name and address of the'attorne ; (c) the names and addresses of all other parties, i known; (d) a clear and concise statement of (1)/the facts which are grounds for the proceedings, (2) the objections to this superseding Order, including a cifically the manner in which it is alleged to be inconsistent with the Department'. Yetlanda Regulat ons (310 CMR 10.00) and does not contribute to the protection of the interests idept of ned in the Act, a (3) the relief sought through the adjudicatory hearing, including specificall., the changes desired i the superseding Order; (e) a statement that a copy of e request has been sent t the applicant, the conservation commission and th each other party or representative of such party, if k Failure to submit all necessary information may result in a di issal by the Department of the Notice of Claim for an Adjudicatoryaring. rior to commencement of work. Detach on dotted line and submit to the .... ...................................... Issuing Authority. To Please be edviaed that the Order of Conditions for the project at � and Nu.�..sr� hoe bar+ recorded rt the Registry of hss beenotain in the chain of title of the affected property in accordance with General Condition 6 on 19 if recorded land, the instrument amber which identifies this transaction is if registered land, the document number which identifies this'transection is Applicant signature , 1-413 aXPim �/f Q /9 70 f � Form s oEQEFile No. 64-152 (To be Proviaea by oEQE) J Commonwealth City/Town SALEM J otMassachusetts Applicant The Fafard Companies �t f Order of.Conditions Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act G.L. c. 131, §40 From Salem Conservation Commission To The Fafard Companies SAME (Name of Applicant) (Name of property owner) Address 290 Eliot Street, Ashland, MA OWc?&es9' SAME This Order is issued and delivered as follows: ❑ by hand delivery to applicant or representative on (date) I7 by certified mail, return receipt requested on September 26. 1988 (date) This project is located at Lot 63, Map 7, Swampscott Road South Essex The property is recorded at the Registry of NA NA Book Page Certificate(if registered) 54812 (Land Court Parcel) 10/30/87 The Notice of Intent for this project was filed an (date) The public hearing was closed on September 8. 1988 (date) Findings The rnrmrTSSTQN has reviewed the above-referencedNotice of Intent and plans and has held a public hearing on the project. Based on the information available to the COMMISSION at this time, the COMMISSION has determined that the area on which the proposed work is to be done is significant to the following interests in accordance with the Presumptions of Significance set forth in the regulations for each Area Subject to Protection Under the Act(check as appropriate): ® Public water supply ® Flood control ❑ Land containing shellfish ® Private water supply ® Storm damage prevention ❑ Fisheries Ground water supply ® Prevention of pollution ❑ Protection of wildlife habitat 51 Theref9re, the COMMISSION hereby finds that the following conditions are necessary, in accordance with the Performance Standards set forth in the regulations, to protect those inter- ests checked above. The COMMISSION orders that all work shall be performed in accordance with said conditions and with the Notice of Intent referenced above.To the extent that the fol- lowing conditions modify or.differ from the plans, specifications or other proposals,submitted with the Notice of Intent, the conditions shall control. General Conditions 1. Failure to comply with all conditions stated herein,and with all related statutes and other regulatory meas- ures,shall be deemed cause to revoke or modity this Order. 2. This Order does not grant any property rights or any.exclusive privileges; it does not authorize any injury to private propertiy or invasion of private rights. 3. This Order does hot relieve ithe permittee or any other person of the necessity of complying with all other applicable federal, state or local statutes.ordinances:by-laws or regulations. 4. The work authorized hereunder shall be completed within three years from the date of this Order unless either of the following apply: (a) the work is a maintenance dredging project as provided for in the Act: or (b) the time for completion has been extended to a specified date more than three years, but less than five years, from the date of issuance and both that date and the special circumstances warranting the extended time period are set forth in this Order. 5. This Order may be extended by the issuing authority for one or more periods of up to three years each upon application to the issuing authority at least 30 days prior to the expiration date of the Order. 6. Any fill used in connection with this project shall be clean till, containing no trash, refuse, rubbish or de- bris, including but not limited to lumber, bricks, plaster, wire, lath, paper, cardboard, pipe, tires, ashes, refrigerators. motor vehicles or parts of any of the foregoing. 7. No work shall be undertaken until all administrative appeal periods from this Order have elapsed or. it such an appeal has been filed, until all proceedings before the Department have been completed. 8. No work shall be undertaken until the Final Order has been recorded in the Registry of Deeds or the land Court for the district in which the land is located, within the chain of title of the affected property. In the - case of recorded land, the Final Order shall also be noted in the Registry's Grantor Index under the name of the owner of the land upon which the proposed work is to be done. In the case of registered land, the Final Order shall also be noted on the land Court Certificate of Title of the owner of the land upon which the proposed work is to be done. The recording information shall be submitted to the COMMISSION on the forth at the end of this Order poor to commencement of the work. 9. A sign shall be displayed at the site not less than two square feet or more than three square feet in size bearing the words6"Massachusettsi hDepartment of Environmental Quality Engineering, Fie Number 10. Where the Department of Environmental Quality Engineering is requested to make a determination and to issue a Superseding Order, the Conservation Commission shall be a party to all agency proceedings and hearings before the Department. 1 1 . Upon completion of the work described herein, the applicant shall forthwith request in writing that a Certificate of Compliance be issued stating that the work has been satisfactorily completed. 12. The work shall conform to the following plans and special conditions: 5-2 Plans: Title Dated Signed and Stamped by: On File with: Exhibit F-Resource 10/30/87 The Fafard Companies Salem Con Comm Area Plan in Salem Business Park, Salem, MA .01970 Engineering Report 7/20/88 David Westerling Salem Con Comm Existine Conditions 5/22/88 The Fafard Companies Salem Con Comm Resource Plan, Distribution Center, Salem Business Park, Salem, MA Special Conditions)Use additional paper if necessary) 1. Work shall conform to above referenced plans. 2. Any changes in building sites or building sizes shall require an amendment to the Order of Conditions. 3. No salt shall be used as a de-icing agent. 4. Prior to construction, staked haybales shall be installed to protect the nearby wetlands. 5. Gas traps shall be installed in catch basins. 6. Receipt and approval of Environmental Impact Report from EOF.A. 7. Conservation Commission members and/or their designated agent reserve the right to enter and inspect the site during construction. 8. As-built plans stamped by a Registered Professional Engineer, shall be submitted to the Commission prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Compliance. .................................................. ............................................................. (Leave space 8IWkq 5.3A Issued By 'ALEM Conservation Commission Si ur Isl f fila Ord e at be signed by a majodty'of the Conservation Commission. On this 22nd day of September POrsonaily appeared th _ ,o a 19 d , before me to me known to be the Person described In and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she executed the same as his/her tree act and deed. NotaryPubhc --tet - My commission expires The applicant.the owner.arty Person aggrieved by this Order.my owner of land abuteng the two upw which the Proposed work a to of done or any ten resrdsnte of the ary or town n whish of Envkonmen W Such Wfo Is located we hereby noshed of their right to requset the Oepar"ent Oua4ty Such to laws a superseding Order.providing the request Is meds by certified mW or hand delivery to meA oar nim d tlelN Intoto ten ma days Canfrom me date Of"Amb Of this Order.A copy aervsoot Commraaror and the appicwt. of me request waa at ms sYne time be sent by csrehe0 ary Ma g io t s rG_'�Nc LAND COURT SURVEYS SUBDIVISIONS REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER LOTSURVEYS MORTGAGESURVEYS CONSULTING PARSONS AND FAIA, INC. 60 LEWIS STREET LYNN, MASSACHUSETTS 01902 593-7927 MAY 14 2004 RE IUX41� �JL o r rS1'Tfic r� �P o1� US �J J i ktJ-2 �r s}' pnwS /� b C �Y/-J1� you 1, may, �9 .%. U • � , // WRY R-01WOR VON Mill IA �Iwl 1 o� /.§►% �, �, �� � � �i!►. Pff- In't pew Ok, ' ► I ww, F4 �0�a .©�!a�► �Y.rME Nom++' wwrl F nv Z.'`�' % �� FARM ON � �� ♦� I�� ° ` 1��—,' - gar pA, , 00.41 ��� .ice*� , P- i Notification to Abutters Under the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act In accordance with the second paragraph of Messachueatts General Laws Chapter 131, section 40, you are hereby notified of the following. A. The name of the applicant is Norman Dube a. The applicant has filed a Notice of intent with the Conservation commission toe the municipality of SaIem,Mass . seeking permission to remove, till, dredge or alter an Area subject to "rot C_Under the Wetlands Proteotloq Act (Gensral Laws Chapter 171, sectlgn 401 . C. The,addrese of the lot where the activity 1s proposed is 4 Technologyl Way Salem, Mass . D. Copies of the Notice of Intent may be examined at Salem Planning Dept . between the hours of 8 : 30AMand 4 :OOPM on the following days of the weeks Non-Thurs . and 8 : 30AM-12 : OOPM Fridays ror more Information, call: ( 978 ) 745 _ 9595 X311 Check ones This in the applicant 0, representative 0, or o City of Salem that © (ppsclfy) r it. Copies of the native of Intent may be obtained from either (check one) the applicant 01 or the applicant's representative ®, by calling thin telephone number ( 781 ) 593 _ 7927 between the hours of B :OOAMand 4 : 00,"on the following days of !ha week: Mon. -Friday -"—T r. Information regarding the data, time, and place of the public hearing may be obtained from _ Salem Planning Dept . by calling this telephone number ( 978 745 _9595 x311between the; hours of LOW and 4 : 00 PM on the ,following days of the week: Mon . -Thurs . check one: This is the applicant 0, representative 0, or other ® (speclr�y) r City of Salem i WOTRr Notice of the public bearing, Inclutime,ding its ante, me, and place, will by published at least five (9) days In advance inAhe Salem Evening News (rune of nesapsper) NOTRr Notice of the public haaringr Including its date, time, and place, will b� posted in the City or Town gall but less than forty-slgbt (1e) hours In advance N0TN1 YOU also WAY COGLAct Tour LOCAL CGRservation Commiaeion or the nesreet DeQart- MOat of Rnvlroamental Protection Regional office for more information about tbl} applloatlos or the Wetlands Protection Act. To contact DEP, call.1 I Central Reglonr 5oo-792-7650 .. Northeast Regionr978,-b6L-7600 southeast Regionr 508-916-2800 Nestern Reglonr 413-781-1100 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE Under the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act (to be submitted to the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection and the Conservation Commission when filing a Notice of Intent) I, Charles D. Faia, Parsons and Faia, Inc. hereby certify under the pains and penalties of perjury that on May jq_ 2004 1 gave notification to abutters in compliance with the second paragraph of Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 131, Section 40, and the DEP Guide to Abutter Notification dated April 8 , 1994 , in connection with the following matter. A Notice of Intent filed under the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act by Norman Dube with the Salem,Massachusetts conservation Commission on May 14 2004 for property located at 4 Technology Way The form of the notification, and a list of the abutters to whom it was given and their addresses, are attached to this Affidavit of Service. See attached sheet Name / n Date Ay ABUTTORS LIST MAP 07LOT 0079 4 TECHNOLOGY WAY SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS MAP 07 LOT0001 CITYOFSALEM LOT 0051 JOHNM.INGEMIREAL TYTRUST 381 HIGHLAND AVENUE SALEM,MASS. 01970 LOT 0060 BARNES ROAD TRUST 383 HIGHLAND AVENUE SALEM, MASS. 01970 LOT 0063 FAFARD R.E. &DEVELOPMENT CORP. 290 ELIOT STREET ASHLAND,MASS. 01721 LOT 0064-0065 A&JREALTY JOANDIDIO CIO GEORGE CORSO 8 DENNISON AVENUE SWAMPSCOTT,MASS. 01907 LOT 0066 NSSS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP P.O. BOX 139044 DALLAS, TX 75313-9094 LOT 0077 SALCOREALTYL.L.C. 3 TECHNOLOGY WAY SALEM,MASS. 01970 LOT 0078 KAKREALTYTRUST J. KELLOG TRUSTEE I TECHNOLOGY WAY SALEM,MASS. 01970 LOT 0083 FRANK A. GOLDEN 53 CLARK STREET SALEM,MASS. 01970 MAP 06 LOT 0011 SALEM CONSERVATION COMMISSION LOT 0012 1 YAW SA AD AND STONE 1715 BROADWAY SAUGUS,MASS. 01906 LOT 0013 MOUNTAINREALTYTRUST SHIRLEYA. HUTCHINSON TRUSTEE P.D. BOX403 SALEM,MASS. 01970 I.S. • • I.S. ` . Lrl .. 111 ` ru e m m (Domestic rN-1 s A r-1-1 s . A 1 0 L USE ru ru Postage S 0.31 uuN '01 ru Postage $ 0.37 UNIT. ID: Q901 C3 Cer11/ied Fee y • O Certified Fes Retum Rede Fee 1-i//7�', O =30 O (EndorsementR aired 1.75 - rtere C3Returnnt ILgtFee1.75 eq ) l A (Endorsement RegWred)p Restilded Delivery Fee - le 1`t �3 R ' o Restrided Delrodry Fee Lrl (Endorsement Required) Ln (Endorsement ReqLT .42 51 a 4.42 D Total PosteBe 8 Fees $ j� Total Postage 8 Fees $ � C3 co M.QV131:1t1!J -_...f:A.......�. rn r C3 en o (ti orpot,Apt:No.; I7" - $Yre94 arPoBanNo...- Q:._15U�_r-tU�.................................... M1 orPOBox No. ) /' �[�� s .-jam .._ .......-- 1......C.LA---k._...._.1-.--.----..._............_.,_.. SALeN MAJJ 01�j 10 cs se e,IIP.4 :r r Postal Postal CERTIFIED MAIL� RECEIPT '-J' ' (Domestic man Only;No 11swiirnce LFI �, _stic Mail .nlv;No InSwance Coverage Provided) � - .i ru r-3 3 INA FACIAL U $ ru p ru ru Postage $ 0.37 Utt T ' 4 1 it Postage $ 0.37 UNIT ID: 0901 o CenllledFee ��% � . 14 0 ceN/led Fee M e t7 Return Recta Fee 2. rostm ��.aN A O (Endorsement Requiretl) 1.75 �A Here OO Retum Reclept Fee `_ * 'S (Pndoreemem Required) 1.75 e p Rastnmed DeMery Fee M� (Endoreament Required) rk C3 fleet".Delivery Fee _ Lrj (Endoreemerd Raqulretl) lerl;i�U3R 0 Total Postage&Fes. $ 4.42 14/rt+ Ln 17 �pp ` O Total Postage&Feee $ 4.42 0 4164'4 ` C3 ant 0.f - r nt To 0 b4i6ef,... �� Sd�,j()_4. .I.0 N. ..'.'.-."."..".'.... o .---•-- --1\wSx` tL !�:T:. W M1 AN..; -..-.ter.... .... A AA� / ----- J............................................ or PO Bar No. I I I QnK''11gD(/✓rl\ t` Srreet,Apt Mo.;- ..--... �. l?..-Y-..--. _ orPoBanNo- Cary,Stets Zl '-----"-- --- -.-1.. - ----- -T �yNu��6 . w �------------------ ��G u�. MA n1 q o city§trite,z7P."a l SJ 01�11D U.S. Postal Service,m • . CERTIFIED MAILT� m , m CO a a ruru ru IlaFF71,CIAL U E ru ru Postage $ 0.37 UNIT ID: 0901 ru Postage s 0.311 UNIT (n'A 901 O Certgled Fee 2.30 _ 0 Cemged Fee [v�FA, O Retum Rods,,Fee � t C3 fleWm Reciept Fee C3 (Endorsement Required) 1.75 ', (Endorsement Required) 1.75` ,1 Here 0 ResVlI d Delivery Fea - v k: ,l O Restricted Delivery Fee - A C3 (Endoreementflequlred) ' RR '1 Ln (Endorsement Required) Ier 0� 3 17 RrUl ;; 4.4t 5; !0 o Total Postage o Ln O Total Postage&Fees $ �yop4 tags 8 Fees $ 4.4� 0 J f -r L C:1 �tt�SSS liMl (� QAUTNt S/ o toS LLd QeAl M1 PO4 l-Na''.-..---- a M1 1,3ae6f.Apt iVa: ...................... .-...-....-..-..-....-.... orPoBorNp. ZECHNu�•o 6_•__ � 75313 -�10�4 S'ntEM S� ptq6 U.S. Postal Service.. Postal 0CERTIFIED MAIL. RECEIPT CERTIFIED MAIL,e RECEIPT0 Cr ECO Momestic,Mail Only;No insurance Coverage provided) a ra a AQNF f 6 A L Q a iE � U S rruu Postage $ 0.37 UNIT TI'- N tw n.1 Postage S 0.37 UNIT IU: 0901 O Certified Fee 2.30 v O Codified Fee �N M" MC3 Return Req t F80 r O Retum Re�lept Fee O (Endorsement Requlretl) 1.7J i .,� pppp D (Endorsement Required) 1.'15 p�a C3 Restricted(Endarsemera ilRequired Fee C r�'° W` O Restricted Delivery Fee C 0;' YVRRR 2 (Endoreement Required) Ln Ln O Taal Possttage&Fees $ 4°4`- '14,�� C3 Total Postage&Fees $ 4.42 O ^t_-.-C�--�(L� -Y...�i-. ._O�VtUJY!':G1 ��!!�!-_... C3 Sent To i M )Cep t 1 r' - -- �-- --- ............... ------------- M1 •or_PO'Box-No ..-Sa:.!.Y...LSXLQT— T-_-----------------_-...........--- M1 orPO,ML No.:-u--O uip o UN AVEAV or PO Box No. U Cly bYete,ZIPH •- HlM D W-)1_1 S PS cv is 01�0-J - _ 3800, See Reverse for Insunuctu,nn; U.S. Postal SerCERTIFIED MAILT� RECEIPT CERTIFIED MAIL. RECEIPT Er (Domestic Mail Only;No Insurance Coverage Provided) rU I (Domestic Mail Only;No Insurance Coverage Provided) viceu. U.S. Postal Service,.tr ru ZAA FAC 6 L rlt PosagN e a 0.37 JU 0901 ru Postage a 0.37 kom7 0901 C3Certified Fee L°3 17 Codified Fee '� H o MAC3 Return nt It t Fae 1° j�jM Realm ReOlapt Fee ° ar O (Endorsement Requlretl) -!� O (Endorsemem Require a 1. j l A C3 ROSVICted(Endowment Delivery Fee (;.: �! R Restricted Oelive Fee (�CtR (Endorsement Requlretl). _U O rY LCU�V V9 @� Ln (Entlorsament Requlretl) C3 Total Postage&Fees $ 4°4� •va14/0 Ln stege8Fees $ 4°4� O��J. f ® nn r�' C3 Total Po Q -ant- pngN S AO TQV.J--.---"------------------------- O --_7T U U-..M...... - V. saae��Pf.WE' - c,a. .�...IlT�. •T.--.-�.T------- +!lw2.--V ------ d-�o".'..g1 1t 6tilA -Q--.P t M1 orPOBOxNO. j9 3 N�61]• t M1 crgi were,n�k...f. JS 0\9 ... cry,surto ztP+4 . -- 3800, „ June 2002 Sh� tN AkAss o\� b :rr June 2002 Amended Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection 64-152 Bureau of Resource Protection- Wetlands DEP File Number WPA Form 3 - Notice of Intent Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 for DEP use only Please type or print clearly all General Information information requested on this 1. Applicant: 3. Property Owner(if different from applicant): form. Norman Dube Swampscott Realty L . L . 0 Name Mame 117 Judge Road 290 Eliot Street Marring Address Mailing Address Lynn Ashland Cdy/rawn Crry/(ann Mass . 01904 Mass . 01721 Stare zip Code State Zip Code 1-781-842-3700 Phone Number 4. Summary of Project Impacts: Fax Number(dapphrable) a. Is any work being proposed in the Buffer Zone? ❑ No 3c Yes E-Mad Address(itappbcabre) If yes,how many sq.ft.? 2. Representative(if any): 2 5 , 0 0 0 s . f . Parsons and Faia Inc : Square reel Firm Charles F a i a b. List the impacts of proposed activities on each wetland contact Name resource area(temporary and permanent impacts,prior to 60 Lewis Street restoration or mitigation): Madmililddress Lynn,Mass . 01902 Resource Area Size of Impact(e.g.,sq.ft.) clwown 0 Slate Zip Code 1-781-593-7927 Phone Number 1-781-593-0806 Fu Number(it applicable) E-Mail Address(d applicable) Project Description 1. Project Location: 2. Registry of Deeds: Salem South Essex ------------ City/—Town County 4 Technology Way Sheet Ade::ess Book 7 part. of Lot 79 Assessors Map/Platt Pa¢eULm/ Page 74004 Massachusetts Oepadment of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection—Wetlands WPA Form 3 - Notice of Intent Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 Project Description (cont.) 3. Project Description: Construction of a building 4. Plan andlor map references(list title and date): access and parkingareas and Prnnncrl 4 Technology Way related earthwork within a Salem, Mass . buffer zone April 30 , 2004 Activities Subject to Regulation 1. a.If Buffer Zones to resource areas are to be impacted,in Land Under Water Bodies: whole or in part,check the applicable resource areas: 0 Square Feet to be altered Inland Resource Areas Coastal Re o trge Argas 0 Cuo¢Yarosto be amoped u Inland Bank O Coastal Beach KWordering Vegetated Welland O Barrier Beach Land Subject to Flooding: •Rocky Intertidal Shore Bordering: 0 ❑Coastal Dune Square Fat tobeallaw 0 ❑Coastal Bank GOO Yards filled ofdbplamd ❑Salt Marsh -Isolated: b. Proposed activities located,in whole or in part,in 0 Wetland Resource Area(s)(Complete all that apply): square Fat to be adeW Inland Resource Ar c 0 Cubic Yards filled a displaces' Bank Cgastal Resource iirearreerlobeuared Salt Marsh: n/a 0 Bordering Vegetated Wetlands: Square Fee;to h altered 0 square Feet toaea#ered Coastal Dune: 0 0 Square Feer to be repualeq orres/med Square Feet to ce altered 0 Cubic YerovVc,'ume to be remond Massachusetts Department of Eariranarental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection—Wetlands t WPA Form 3 - Notice of Intent Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. C. 131, §40 Activities Subject to Regulation.(cont) Land Under Ocean: n/a ii.Width of Rivertront Area(check one): Square AWtobe akered O 25 feet-Designated Densely Developed Areas only O 100 feet-New agricultural projects only cubic Yards to be dredged ❑ 200 feet -all other projects iii.Mean annual high-water line determined by: Beach: (check all that apply) Sgwekerroo mrerea ❑ Changes in soil;vegetation;water marks;scouring 0 Top of bank(inland rivers) O First observable break in slope Rocky Intertid9 Shore: C Mean annual flood level C Mean high tide(for coastal rivers only) n/a SquareFeerro bearlxed iv.Distance of proposed activity closest to the,mean-annual high-water line: Land Under Salt Pond: Feet n/a Spoon Fmrrobeepwed v.Total area(square feet)of Riverfront Area on the site of — the proposed project: .. cgbarararohesaw Coastal Bank: SgiemFeet n/a A.Proposed aheration of Rivertront Area: LhOrfmrrobea0ered ToWSquarefeet Designated Port Area: n/a square F0 wiam 1006.bom bank SquereFe6robe8rlwe4 '. S%weFeNNAM0100md10011,bombarrk Land Containing.Shellfish: n/a 2. iBordenng Vegetated Wetland Delineation:Explain the determination of Bordering Vegetated Wetland boundaries Spuare Feet robe ekered identified on plans: Fish Run: fl Final Order of Resource Area Delineation issued by conservation commission or DEP(attached) n/a 64-152 O DEP BVW Field Data Form(attached) LinmrFeefrode arrered i O Other Method of Determining BVW boundary(Check all Rived rant Area that apply and attach documentation): n/a O 50%or more wetland indicator plants. i.Name of waterway(if available): i ❑Saturatedrinundated conditions exist O Groundwater indicators C Direct observation Hydric soil indicators =Credible evidence of conditions prior to disturbance ��* I Mamchasatts ftartotent of Eotriromn taf p etactfan Bureau of Resource Protection—Wetlands WPA !Form 3 - Notice of Intent Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 Activities Subiect to Regulation (cont) 3.Sites Subject to Special Protection a. Is any portion of the proposed project located within b. Is any portion of the proposed project located within an estimated habitat which is indicated on the most recent Area of Critical Environmental Concern(ACEC)? Estimated Habitat Map Of State-Listed Rare Wetland 1 Yes 3;No If yes,provide name of ACEC(see Wildlife published by the Natural Heritage and Endangered Appendix D for ACEC locations): Species Program? C Yes jF.NO ACEC If yes,include proof of mailing or hand delivery of N01 to: Gare olMap ACEC Program Department of Environmental Management If yes,include proof of mailing or hand delivery of N01 to: 100 Boston,MA 022pmbridge Street, pth floor Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program c• Is any portion of the site subject to a Wetlands Division of Fisheries and Wildlife Restriction Order under the Inland Wetlands Restriction Act 100 Cambridge Street (M.G.L.c.131,S.40A)or Coastal Wetlands Restriction Act Boston,MA 02202 (M.G.L c.131,s.105)? G Yes �kNo rformance Standards If yes,attach a copy of the Restriction Order to the NOL Pe 1. Is any portion of the proposed activity eligible to be treated b•Was the lot where the activity is proposed created prior to i as a limited project subject to 310 CMR 10.24 or 310 CMR August 1,1996? 10.53? M Yes ❑No ❑Yes 0 No If yes,describe which limited project applies to this project 4. a. Describe how the project will meet all performance standards for each of the resource areas altered;including standards requiring consideration of alternative project ! design orlocation. Attach addhlonal sheets it n a��� no ,alteration 2. Is any activity within any Resource Area or Buffer Zone exempt from performance standards of the wetlands regulations,310 CMR 10.00. ❑Yes 0 No If yes,describe which exemption applies to this project: b. stormwater Management: The project is exempt from the DEP Stormwater Policy: ❑ Yes $ No If yes,explain why the project is exempt: 3, a. Is the project located in the Rivertront Area: C Yes x No If yes,indicate the proposed project purpose: Single family home :3 Residential subdivision Commercial development If no,stormwater management measures are requird. Industrial development Applicants are encouraged to complete C Transportation stormwater Mann�omnm c .� Aooendix Other-describe: and submit it with trye I Notice of Intent. —4- 011 - I — _._ MassachusettsOepadmeatofF-Mrs anenta/Protection Bureau of Resource Protection—Wetlands WPA Form 3 - Notice of Intent Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 Additional Information Applicant must include all the following with this Notice of Intent: • USGS or other map of the aria(along with a narrative description,if necessary),containing sufficient information for the conservation commission and the Department to locate the site. • Plans identifying the location of proposed activities(including activities proposed to serve as a BVW replication area or other mitigating measure)relative to the boundaries of each affected resource area. • Other material identifying and explaining the determination of resource area boundaries shown on plans (e.g.,a DEP BVW Feld Data Form). • List of the I les and final revision dates of all plans and other material submitted with this N01. Fees The fees for work proposed under each Notice of Intent must Applicants must submit the following information(in be calculated and submitted to the conservation commission addition to pages 1 and 2 of Appendix B)to confirm fee and the Department(see the Insbucdons and Appendix B: payment: Wetland Fee Transmittal Form). Y�3/Zm No fee shall be assessed for projects of the federal govem- ment,the Department of Environmental Protection,or cities and towns of the Commonwealth. iarw"ameoomea4 J oGgd4A,.e 90 L!:- Aawwn name(reiaerem van Mori Signatures and Submittal Requirements I hereby certify under the penalties of perjury that the For conserva0oa commission foregoing Notice of Intent and accompanying plans,docu- Two copies of the completed Notice of Intent(Forml3), ments,and supporting data are true and complete to the best including supporting plans and documents;two copies of of my knowledge.I understand that the conservation commis- pages 1 and 2 of Appendix B;and the ciryrtown fee payment sion will place notification of this Notice in a local newspaper must be sent to the conservation commission by certified mail at the expense of the applicant in accordance with the wetlands or hand delivery. regulations,310 CMR 10.05(5)(a). For QEP: I further certify under penalties of perjury that all abutters were coo copies of the completed Notice of Intent(Form 3), notified of this application,pursuant to the requitements'of including supporting plans and documents;two copies of M.G.L.0.472 of the Massachusetts Acts of 1993;Notice must pages 1 and 2 of Appendix B;and a copy of the stale fee be made in writing by hand defivery.or certified mail(return payment must be sent to the DEP regional office by certified receipt requested)to all abutters within 100 feet of the mail or hand delivery(see Appendix A for regional office property line of the project Iodation. addresses). Other. .. If the applicant has checked the'yes"box in any part of Mr:,,. nrrP Section C, Item 3,above,refer to that section and the Instruc- tions for additional submittal requirements. Npnarae alaoCerryawrur ire Thi original and copies must be sent simuftaneousfy.Failure by the applicant to send copies in a timely manner rtay result in dismissal of the Notice of Intent. Signature olreDres.°nrari�E - '� Dare � j 1 310 CMR: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRON}fENTAL QI AL:T,Y ENGINEERING 10.99: continued Form 3 DECE F9e No. �• y Iia be orompep DY DEOEI Commonwealth of Massachusetts cllylltwK Salem Howard A. Fafard AOpl,canl / Notice of Intent Under the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act, G.L. c. 131 , §40 and Application for a Department of the Army Permit Part I:General Information Swampscott Road t. Location: Street Address Lot Number �Iap 7,LO't 63 Construction of a one-story, 50,000 2. Project:Type Industrial Bldg'Description +/- s.f. light industrial building with 149 parking spaces for one or more tenants on a 4.3 +/- acre parcel within Salem Business Park. Access via existing drive across wetlands to Swampscott Road. South Essex N.A. g Pace N.A. 3. Recistry: County Current Book Certificate(i1 Registered Land) 54812 Howard A. Fafard Tel. 508/881-1600 a. Applicant 290 Eliot Street, Ashland , M 01721. Address 508/881-1600 S. Property Owner Howard A. Fafard Tel. 290 Eliot Street , Ashland, MA 01721 Address 508/881-1600 6. Representative Ronald Killian Te1 290 Eliot Street , Ashland, MLA 01721 Address 7. Have the Conservation Commission and the DECE Regional Cffice each been sent, by certified mail or hand delivery, 2 copies of completed Notice of Intent,with supporting plans and documents? Yes Z No ❑ - 3-t 310 CZAR - i0/i6/9% (Effec live li/1/E71 310 CMR: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ENCINEERINC 10.99: continued 8. Have all obtainable permits,variances and approvals required by local by-law been obtained? Y.^s ❑ No Obtained: Applied For: Not Applied For: Site Plan Review Approval Wetlands & Flood Hazard Special Permit 9. Is any portion of the site subject to a Wetlands Restriction Order pursuant to G.L.c. 131, §40A or G.L. c. 130, §1057 Yes ❑ No 0 10.List all plans and supporting documents submitted with this Notice of Intent. Identifying Title. Dale Number/Letter r A Location Map (U S.G.S. topo) FA Industrial Condominium, Sale18m Business nark Site Plan of Land, Rev. 4 89, Sheet 1 of 1, FA1090n 5-51 B Drainage Calculations, 4/21/89 1 1.Check those resource areas within which work is proposed: (a)M BuflerZone (B.V.W.) (b)Inland: ❑ Bank' Land Subject to Flooding, ❑ Bordering Vegetated Wetland' ❑ Bordering see D.O.A. 9/25/87) ❑ Land Under Water Body &Waterway' "%u Isolated (c)Coastal C3Land Under the Ocean' C2 Designated Port Area ❑ Coastal Beach' ❑ Coastal Dune ❑ Barrier Beach ❑ Ccastal Bank ❑ Rocky Intertidal Shore' ❑ Sall Marsh' ❑ Land Under Salt Pond ❑ Land Containing Shellfish' Z, Fish Run' 'Likely to involve U.S. =rmy Corps of Engineers concurrent p,mclic"�" see General Instructions for Compieung Notice of Intent. 3-2 10/16x6: (Effective 11/1/87) 310 C\1R - 180.1B r • 310 GMR: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY E.N0:NFZR:SG 10.99: continued 12. Is the wetland resource area to be altered by the proposed work located on the most recent Estimated Habitat Map (if any) of rare."state-listed" vertebrate and invertebrate animal species occurrences provided to the conservation commission by the Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program? YES ( ] NO ( a] Date printed �ny`nn slfiimated HabiitClMap issued ober NO MAP AVAILABLE [ j (!(any)__ yttff it yes. have you completed an Appendix A and a Notice of Intent and filed them. along with supporting documentation with the Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program by certified mail or hand delivery. so that the Program shall have received Appendix A prior to the filing of this.Notice of Intend YES [ ] NO [ 1 33 310 CbIR - '_80.10 r [ 310 CMR: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ENGINEERING 10.99: continued Part It:Site Description Indicate which of the following information has been provided (on a plan.in narrative description or calcula- tions) to clearly,completely and accurately describe existing site conditions. Identifying Number/Letter (of plan,narrative or calculations( Natural Features: N.A. Soils N.A. Vegetation A,FA Topography N.A. Open water bodies(including ponds and lakes) FA Flowing water bodies(including streams and rivers) N.A. Public and private surface water and ground water supplies on or within 100 feet of site N.A. Maximum annual ground water elevations with dales and location of test FA Boundaries of resource areas checked under Part I,item 1 1 above N-A• Other , Man-made Features: FA Structures(such as buildings, piers, towers and headwalls) FA,B Drainage and flood control facilities at the site and immediately off the site, including culverts and open channels (with inverts), dams and dikes FA Subsurface sewage disposal systems FA Underground utilities FA Roadways and parking areas FA Property boundaries, easements and rights-of-way N.A. Other Part III:Work Description - Indicate which of the following information has been provided Ion a plan, in narrative description or calcula- tions) to c:early,completely and accurately describe work proposed within each of the resource areas checked in Part 1, item I 1 above. Identilving Number/Letter (of Dian. narrative or calculations) Plainview and Cross Section of: FA Structures(such as buildings. piers, towers and headwalls) FA,B Drainage and flood control facilities, incluoing culverts ano open channels (with invertsl, dams and dikes FA Subsurface sewage disposal systems d underground utilities FA Filling, dredging and excavating, indicating volume and composition of material FA,B Comoensatory storage areas,where required in accordance with Part 111,Section 10:57 (a)of the regulations N.A. Wildlife habitat restoration or replication areas Other Point Source Discharce B Descnouon of cnarac:erisucs of discharge from point Source(both closed ano ccen channel), wnen coin)of cis0narge:ails within resource area cneckeo under Part I, :lem above, as suoodrted py standard engineering calculations. data ano pians. 'nciucing but not limited to the fallowing: �-a 10/16/87 (E:ieduve 11/1/87) 3i0 C\IR - 200.:0 r iO C�tR: _^. P.4r-fit E::T OF io.99: continued 1. Delineation of the drainage area contributing to the point of discharge; 2. Pre-and post-development peak run-off Irom the drainage area,at the point of discharge. for at least the 10-year and 100-yearlreauency storm; 3. Pre-and pose-development rale of infiltration contributing to the resource area checked under Part I,item 11 above; 4. Estimated water quality characteristics of pre-and post-development nun-off at the point of discharge. Part IV:fAlllgating Measures i. e.with reference to supporting plans and calculations where Clearly, completely and accurately describ necessary: meet the performance standards set lorlh under each re. (a) All measures and designs proposed to source area specified in Part II or Part III of the regulations:or cified In Part II or Part III of Ina regula- (b) why the presumptions set lorth under each resource area spe tions do riot aOPIY• loenlilying numoer or letter Coeatal RelOUrCe Area ty0e: OI su000rl Documents ff lnlano Isolated Land Subject to Flooding (ILSP) Approximately 550 +/- sf of ILSF will be PA,B altered. The area is not being filled , but I excavated to ar. elevation that will provide a stable slope for adjacent parking spaces. Drainage capacity is compensated through use of e>:isting wetland area to the north (see Determination of Applicability 9/25/87 and Order of Conditions 4x'64-152, 9/22/88 for adjacent Business Park land) . I i — I IoenLNinO ncmoer:"en^� — r.W51d1 Resource A'..Type: o15VOCOrt OoCOmems _ Imanc I 31,C) CMIR i I ' I f i III II �!I it I I i � 3:0 CMR: DEPARTME-\T GFME\TAL QUAL:T1' cVGIti ECRI\G 1o.99: continued IDenldy'09 npmper a letter ❑ C0851W R.SOWDe Are.Type: 01 SUDDorI ppCUmeMs ❑ tnla,,0 2. Clearly, comoletely and accurately describe,with reference to supporting plans and calculations where necessary: (a) all measures and desians to regulate work within the SuHer Zone so as to ensure that said work does not alter an area specified in Part I, section 10.02(1) (a) of these regulations: or lot if work in the Suffer Zone will alter such an area.all measures and designs proposed to meet the performance standards established for the adjacent resource area,specified:in Part II or Part III of these regulations. 1Dema��r,q r,�moer or gene, Coastal ReSDUICC Area Type 5or0ere0 By I OO Foot DIS«elipnary ZpDe: DI SUDDDrI 00CUMen15 lr,la"a Bordering Vegetated Wetlands (BVW) Erosion control in the form of haybaies or silt rA,B fence will be placed along the BVW border to protect I 1 this resource area. This control will be erected prior to construction and maintained until wort: is completed. tdo work will be done within the BVW. The driveway, parking spaces and lanes, and part of the building will be constructed within the buffer zone. 1 i i &5 r 310 CMR: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ENGINEERING 10.99: continued Part V:Additional Information for a Department of the Army Permit 1. COE Application No. 2' (lo be provided by COE) (Name of waterway) 3. Names and addresses of property owners adjoining your property: 4. Document other project alternatives(i.e..other locations and/or construction methods, particularly those that would eliminate the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters or wetlands). 5. 8%" x 11 " drawings in planview and cross-section, showing the resource area and the proposed activ- ity ctioity within the resource area. Drawings must be to scale and should be clear enough for photocopying. Certification is required.from the Division.of Water Pollution.Control before the Federal permit can be issued.Certification may be obtained by contacting the Division of Water Pollution Control,1 Winter Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02108. Where the activity will take place within the area under the Massachusetts approved Coastal Zone Management Program,the applicant certifies that his proposed activity complies with and will be conducted in a manner that is consistent with the approved program. Information provided will be used in evaluating the application for a permit and is made a matter of public record through issuance of a public notice.Disclosure of this information is voluntary,however,if necessary information is not provideo, the application cannot be processed nor can a permit be issued. I hereby certify under the oains and penalties of perjury that the foregoing Notice of Intent and accomdanving plans. documents and supporting data are true and comolete. to the best of my knowledge. Signature�oicant 3� _ Date iltr r�a0 � J Signature of Applicant's Reoresentative Date FORM ........ .. ENG cern .J.6 gvry 4 by NQU9ACE. 6 MIT196:\ MED100 (TEST) ._h,r d., .n. ..n...n. . Q.......... .1 Ars, .nd 91n. .( M..uvnu.nl. .v air.urn 1 N.A Y 82 m. . ... .. .. .d...n ... .....n .. ......n, •n U.h.d S..lo .....I. Th. Oui.. .( N.n....n.n. and B.dv. I0M81 hu .vv...ed IL... .0 r.u.n. r. uvea h' Ih. US Arm. _or.. .1 _n.m.en. J40 An�err 0]6] O6]6 and .......... .... .I JD S•vun.n.r :9fl] .vv.u. Chi. 1-7 10/16,37 (Effective 11/1/87) 310 CMR - 230.-3 $. ,•OOk� ��S "* �n�-:"_'"'" ,11 ', t_. � '� ct r a m ,:�5 -c. . - � 3 � �..,/ � A M.� c-�p� oro r'� ■ Ean 1 � �<r�o OeeLy - //sr ®'Bou A i,r Whirf _� tTle�dow IF 5P �: 1 A• P.� It, f v t // ✓ � L\� �,-\r fer of J(LJI �, 1 �1a I I _ �t\ - IQ7 m .,. 14 --���,II I\� $�SositJ '.Aowl • I y .� 1 e , iy -% almer� r fi - 4laesrAl R.ael opt h a����°� i L J �. 1. ,i_� J _ �"•—\�\-1rr y 701�N IN r( O/);� �-�.� a ° / �/ ;�e/ J � � � T•'4 "'}t, I It1�. .J�n, W ' )) Prophe lu°O, % .,� Z��c � l�. ^ a� _� 1 1��_ n2a ' r� '1::- • a 4706 60 1 ,60 MR, .�•,'{°` .a Jf ,%1(�Le{C8. f rl ' 11 f� .. i-•�v 1�1� o/ss � Ja r j � i) �s , �d r J�`la 470$ 0 1 Abo- " vir 000 Jlc(6,n \. +.=�'^v�� Ii. �'+ Ia 0.. FEET $ a Jl' 4704 I,h, I�it (91acsAp�1131 Blaney Roc If n— JLittlas Pt a: 1.''8 ' 1103 N HAP " �0 for LOCATIO IT SALEM AND LYNN, MASS . QUADS �.y.0 lso Red RDilt •\,a IE �ti+n :1-I _ p Pork -q Iuo�X.PAGE: 6 PROJECT �aICIYI J?usine55 Park JUJ N0. i6q��^s CO��p 8Y: y CHKO. 6Y7 n 9-20-88 p�TE:'Z/ •APR/L / 989 Indos r a CI0 YY11 DATE: Deelpn Period : (�- ���l �- p 0 V Lcrglh T0101 Inv. Irrv. Rim Gutter `Local Ion Rood.o Other. of Full Elev. _EIev. Elev. W1dih011 LCA Tc LTc I IxL D 3 n full foil Run Remarks (fl) UPPEN LOW[� LO,' I A C CA A C CA Lofl RIpM From TC (Act IALc) (Min) IMinl (1N hc1 lcl+l lint 11V(LI Icl+l li�l 11 i.1 ENO_ ENo ENO ' A .315 3Z .45 .1a4 •459 �6 5• Z.6L 12 008 ois 2.8 3.4 0. 7z X13.33 g2. 61 '7`8.00 c 6-Z ,58 DMH-1 3'1 333 33� G6 5, 1 .90 12 vlb DIS 4.0 5.0 I � . 2`� 3 A3 _7,3 18 OD a.5z 18 •007 .015 7.q 4,3 1�5 1.23 `Iz. 11_ C7 C). - - -- j 333 �6 5.7 1,90 IZ 67 .015 4.0 D IS' ZS % 7 - 9-6/2 pMH-Z 37 333 �. 4, /, 6 _ 3 260 SZ X0.88 _2 06 1 ! H-Z F 1 - z-66 666 5,7 3.80 IZ .020 o15 4.4 70 S. 5 O :'7/. o5 . 75 FE-2 .74' - rY" i 'i r_r�-S pMH 3 38 34Z .57 .9 .513 .855 G6 5. 4. �d7 14- G40 .D/5 6.3_ 7.6 50 D 9 .4U ?2.4 80 40 16.80 0+}'r (�clode QaoF Dra n G -6 3 al •l Z- 5.7 ' .2 IZ .0 Z- .015 Jr 20 73. 72. 0 76. q-� pMH3 IS 9 ,(35 135 G6 5•'7 •T7 I C .015 5 Ib 0.611 3. 0: n,%.40 16, w 6.41 Ol6 d5 I - 0. /, a '11.65 pMH FE-3 c6-8 C(3 _9 0 9 s t L 12 Ozy 015 S 'ID Z' 73,z 73.0 o Z- S. zl IZ ,oz .015 -9 to 0-7qZ - .o C(L U-)-. 4 I i Ii 4 TECHNOLOGY WAY RRW�CEIVED STORMWATER CONTROL SYSTEP�. MAINTENANCE CHECKLIST SEP 0 9 2004 DEPT.OF PLANNING& COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Date/ Units Maintenance Frequency Initials A. (1) Oil Separator Remove sediment in bottom Once per Year or Manhole of units with Vac truck or solids when 6" deep (6) Deep Sump pump. Replace oil absorbent log — P-)rn`I �� ye0l orjt v-. Catch Basins in oil separator. qs Cht al 011 G.bSail,� I;h 1 B. (1) Oil Separator Clean surface with net, scoop or Once per Year Tank rake up debris in front of divider Especially late Fall baffle. Inspect tank for sediment build-up. If over 4" deep, dry tank and shovel up sediment or pump out. C. (1) Forebay Make sure water is passing through Twice per Year the stone divider. Inspect forebay, Clean when sediment remove leaves, debris and tall plants. over 6" deep. Mow vegetation twice per year, pull roots and sod from stone divider. D. (1) Infiltration Pond Maintain water tolerant grasses and Twice per Year sod on bottom, side slopes and top of Clean when sediment berms. Mow 2-3 times per year. over 12" deep. Repair erosion zones. Remove debris, trees and shrubs. E. (I) Overflow Weir Maintain large stone cover, pull tall Twice per Year Weeds, roots, and shrubs from overflow area . Keep spillway clear of wood, vegetation and debris. /1Z11V*&n4 �n O°C 9vch%i-P Cwb7 I ' �y l til 7 ,jt 4 h'c rrt Yi -ri t1�" SS 1t C, N� n 't-1 c rAli ejj P � ♦e�y�rs;,�f �iy,"'Yyp,l ?> a.9u xt� } 1 "S* 2t id�Ci '��. ><r ) r a s h S`r' a.ly 7Ya ! k• � `^�. yrw.r, i ;, ..., � w t' rY rPa2y� �^�" y�/ .+12!'+••(' X f' yY y� 'y r� 11 ------------- �^S z n T•f�i^2dS�y,ir � b M a `'a+ rw/� �.� ..�..� r4Vn�� r rlt>✓� ys. s �y- ,ry':.• ' 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 ' INTRODUCTION This Stormwater Management Plan has been prepared for the property at 4 Technology Way, Salem, MA, in accordance with the Best Management Practices(BMP) promulgated by DEP and the wetlands Protection Act MGL Chapter 131, Section 40. The submittal is designed to address the 8 standards contained in the Stormwater Management Form and provide details on the Hydrology of the site pre and post development. There is a marsh wetlands and brook that flows through the east side of the property along Swampscott Road, emptying into Thomson's Meadow and the Forest River. This marsh receives all the site runoff. The Site Locus can be seen in Figure One. The site is being developed to house the Atlantic Paving Co. now located on Jefferson Avenue in Salem. The zoning board has stipulated that all paving equipment and trucks be stored inside the building. The building will be a 10,000 sf steel sided slab on grade structure with garage doors in the rear. The building will be surrounded by paved parking surfaces 30-50' wide with a 4" bituminous curb and catch basin drainage system. The total paved area is 25,700 sf(.60 acre). Deep sump manholes will • be used to convey stormwater to a 2000 gallon oil/grit separator tank containing oil absorbent logs. Cross sections of the precast units can be found in the appendix. After pretreatment in the separator the stormwater will flow into a forebay (1600 sf) and infiltration basin(2150 sf at 1') designed to reduce peak flows, provide recharge to the groundwater and remove greater than 80% of the Total Suspended Solids The soil types and percentage cover pre and post development are compared in Table 1. The site is currently 50% stripped ledge, rip-rap, fill zones and some natural cover. SOILS The proposed building and parking will cover almost all the ledge. The fill and natural area by the marsh will be used for the forebay and infiltration pond. Although the area is characterized as a CrC, a Chatfield Hollis rock outcrop complex, at 3-15% slope with 5-15' of extremely stony fine sandy loam over bedrock, hydrologic group B, much of the natural material has been stripped and/or pushed into the • wetlands before 1987. The attached photographs show the site, subsoils and receiving marsh. The USGS Soil Map is enclosed as Figure Three. ONO' MIR MA 1 IN 1310 I'M INN GRWM � IS'a ®R R • iMe Aq� Wrl MIN ggle Wal k,W 16 TABLE ONE 4 Technology Way • Surface Area Description Atlantic Paving Hydrologic Group Pre Development Post Development Wetlands D 10,060 SF 10,060 SF Rip Rap C 4800 4800 Grass & Shrub B 32,880 20,480 Woodland B 6470 6470 Ledge IlVIP 24,000 1000 Building HVIP 0 9700 Parking DAP 0 25,700 78,210 1.795 AC 787210 i j 4 '� `!i i k -�, ..r `m��.�• �Y��ali,��p.�t��, r :.2. ' ��A �r 1� 1� ... 1' X'pi yyrr yy..��yy jj!! �Sfi�. L M I�1(..fNa �O.Ev p�F: �'�+� •M. rry'A F x.�x� � s3. r 1 TO 11 Wi ;R, �� _�! • �� l a,�Fi 1r�4``l ja���iCq E/"�F^" .� N �T( ! l ��r � � ry f;yyYY v Yp ,�ZaM'f k� R���'fi4'Lr�{,`�' � • � �(�T'�} W a'r' ,•Y ` fK � T'• �; l l'r�� 4 ��'f��Yti�.r y�?l�L: �j.y }^Fr�{ 'S1 � �X MO y k k i 4 Y �vnti"�� '^agv'a 3 g Vsl dfj s 1 i �� l d q l J33 kr-" le i � Z'N�✓S � Y� L v f fi . Y k If y r �� t�Y�Y1/4���`��{q�U'9,pfl�1p -3. �✓�is h�qq � � ���t yt�'�Ir�'d Nal i��. l � $ I lira t"r. � �� 1Ar ° I`r g},�3} �+f•��' S ��1A (rl{ t =t f �;� �d� �f'�Y ° r�',ir pp�i�akn 2 art[ 1f� �+7°✓`s hP}}}c a��"v(��4� �x� ��,; I- ik. xeff 1� v'fa �,> '"" R'f3 Nk 4 vhf� j, stt la"jjk�r r i ,� �� 1;01 us J�t a��r n� i(•n i kl d t K ���( -'�.� r/ . 1 F A i r i a • The fill materials were also large rock and dredge spoils as indicated in the Environmental Assessment reports. This means upon excavation of the pond certain materials may be suitable for the berms, but the sides and bottom will likely be replaced with 1-2' of sand/gravel fill with approx. 10% silt to provide a better hydraulic connection to the groundwater, which has been found at 68-69' elevation compared to the design pond bottom elevation of 74. The layout also takes advantage of the existing rip-rap banks by directing the controlled flow (6" PVC) and overflow weir to the banks. TEMPORARY CONTROL MEASURES The discharge will be adjacent to monitoring well 41 and MW's #2 and 3 are located beside the pond. This will provide for groundwater monitoring during construction activities and into the future. It is recommended that the wells be tested for nutrients, (NH3,NO3 and PO4), metals (lead) and extractable petroleum hydrocarbons after construction is complete and one year after the system is operation. To ensure that rain events during construction do not release sediment or pollutants to the marsh, especially since one half the site is impermeable and greater than 5% slope, it is part of the short-term management practices to construct a temporary forebav and detention pond in the same down gradient location as the permanent pond. In addition to the hay bales shown at the top of the slope, there will be a swale/ditch constructed along the downgradient perimeter on the east and north sides to direct construction runoff into the detention pond. Velocity impoundments(6" rock)will be placed every 100' to slow velocity and reduce erosion. If certain rain events fill the temporary pond, a water sample of the effluent end will be taken after 24 hours to view solids and nutrient removal, or if the rain event overflows the pond, a sample of the stormwater entering the wetland (after treatment)will be taken to ensure compliance with the water quality regulations. The location of the appurtenances and infiltration pond can be found in Figure i Two,the Site Plan and the Parsons& Faia survey plan. TABLE TWO 4 Technology Way Runoff Calculations Rain Events WQV 2 Year 10 Year 100 Year .5" 3.10" 4.70" 8.3" Impervious Area SF .041' .258' .39' .69 Building 9700 Parking 24,700 Total IA 25,400 1451 9133 13,806 CF 24,485 6.34 CFM 9.35 CFM 17.0 CFM Control Units Retention Oil Separator Area Volume CF Time 58 270 43 min. 29 16 Forebay 3505 1225 2825 7.4 hr. 5.0 2.8 40x40 1600 Infiltration Pond 30x90 2150 x 2 4300 40x100 3350 x 2 6700 29 hr. 19.6 10.8 Total 13,825 h D�o�JOs�f9 oic CTtkSSEgA, ikvb l II to �oC���� /L �� ;� FIGURE TWO 00 -- - SITE PLAN flu, ?�rtb�e s i t6No o0 o M I IL a 5r PLOT 727 /.8 4c -5 FIGURE THREE 4 TECHNOLOGY WAY USGS SOIL MAP 1977 CrC CHATFIELD HOLLIS ROCK OUTCROP COMPLEX B Poin,sheep n i F _ 40 F` - i dr .'✓t' i Q _.. '; :y, ( "'R~`� �vgi ss.P .s ' 1 o iAtti ,S ��.� v 'sf mai s.. - � ✓: Y �, �. Ou xR. i3 � CrD -UD :, s s V}NNIP ,. 'G � i :__ � �'• U0. y HIL- H.C. uu CrD .. p Ur . . CrD U ,�.,{� t _ COC . . HuC•. IH ._ CIO ..:..Huc ^_ _ L Ur fA Ur Huc uD - 4 Dc -crD CIO HuC Jjy' LM k '♦ Ur N°B PGC aD c1c Off' 5S VO 4 Huc L i SWAMPSCOTT,. .. \ .. - Ur ur \ H TABLE THREE i 4 Technology Way SOIL LOGS Deep Hole # 1 2 3 4 5 Fill 0" 0-36" 0-84" 0-60" 0 Top Soil Loam 0-18" 36-48" - - 0 Bony Brown Gravel & Till 18-90" 48-108" 84-108" 60-108" 0-48" Ledge 90" None None None None Ground Elevation 80.6 80.7 80.8 82.3 Perc. Rate 3min/inch, 20"/hr. Group A RUNOFF CALCULATIONS • The runoff calculations for the developed site are shown in Table 2, by the rationale method, assuming no infiltration and a pond sized to retain a ten year storm (in this case 13,806 CF). The table shows that the water quality volume(WQV) for 0.5" times the area is 1451 CF, compared to a pond capacity at one foot depth of 2150 CF, an over-design of 48%. Likewise the forebay at 2825 CF is almost ten times the required size of 0.1"x the area, which equals 294 CF. The retention time for the control structures, assuming they are full from a previous storm, provide some degree of treatment even for the 100 year storm which would generate 24,485 CF in 24 hours or an average of 17.0 CFM. The 100 year storm retention time for the oil separator is 16 minutes, the forebay 2.8 hours and the pond 10.8 hours, which is above the minimum I hour retention time that usually results in at least 50% suspended solids removal. The development will cover approx. 0.26 acres of Hydrologic Group B & C soils, that would have infiltrated .004 AF (acre feet) per event, however the infiltration provided by the .049 acre pond at 1' would be .098 AF, which provides more recharge to the groundwater than original conditions. This provides conservative design criteria. The HydroCad 6.1 program is used to compare pre and post peak flows and show pond design with infiltration. INFILTRATION POND To protect the infiltration pond from excessive solids loading and erosion an equal width 2' deep forebay is constructed before the pond. The forebay contains large 6-12" rock at the 12" entrance pipe to break up flow and has a 6-12" rock divider(approx. 3' wide to elevation 77.5') between the forebay and pond that evens out flow, promotes laminar flow and retains leaves and debris. The bottom of the infiltration pond will be graded as flat as possible to provide uniform ponding and exfiltration of the runoff across the floor. Enhanced deposition of sediment in low areas may clog the surface soils, resulting in reduced infiltration and wet areas. The side slopes of the basin should be no steeper than 2:1 (horizontal: vertical), to allow for proper vegetative stabilization, easier mowing, • easier access, and better public safety. TABLE FOUR 4 Technology Way Pre & Post Development Flows Pre Post Subcatchment CFS AF CFS AF 2 Year Storm SC 1 1.24 .091 .07 .006 After Pond SC 2 1.31 .121 .82 .172 10 Year Storm • SC 1 2.03 .151 .66 .051 SC 2 3.10 .256 .81 .166 100 Year Storm SC 1 3.79 .286 .46 .034 SC 2 7.95 .607 1.14 .388 Immediately following basin construction, the bottom and side slopes of the basin should be stabilized with a dense turf of water tolerant grass. Usually low maintenance, rapidly germinating grasses, such as fescues and reed canary grass, are recommended. During the first two months, the newly established vegetation should be inspected several times to determine if any remedial actions (reseeding, irrigation, etc.) are necessary. Trees and shrubs should not be planted within the basin or on the impounding embankments, in order to reduce the chance of basin failure due to root decay or subsurface disturbance. The root penetration and thatch formation of the turf maintains and may enhance the original infiltration capacity. Soluble nutrients are taken up by the turf for growth, improving the pollutant removal capacity. The dense turf will impede soil erosion and scouring of the basin floor. Vegetative buffers around the perimeter of the basin are recommended for erosion control and additional sediment and nutrient removal. MAINTENANCE As infiltration basins are prone to failure due to the clogging of porous solids, it is imperative that aggressive maintenance plans and schedules be developed and implemented for these BMPs. Preventive maintenance should be performed at least once a year, and ideally sediment should be removed from pretreatment sumps and tank every year and from the forebay and pond when more than F has accumulated. An operations and maintenance manual is included in the DEP, Stormwater Management Form. Once the basin has gone online, inspections should occurafter every major storm for the Erst few months to ensure proper stabilization and function. Attention should be paid to how long water remains standing in the basin after a storm; standing water within the basin 48 to 72 hours after a storm indicates that the infiltration capacity may have been overestimated. Factors responsible for clogging (such as upland sediment erosion, excessive compaction of soils and low spots) should be repaired immediately. • Thereafter, the infiltration basin should be inspected at least twice per year. Important items to check for include: differential settlement, cracking, erosion, leakage, or tree growth on the embankments, condition of riprap, sediment accumulation and the health of the turf. At least twice a year, the buffer area, side slopes and basin bottom should be mowed. Grass clippings and accumulated organic matter should be removed to prevent the formation of an impervious organic • mat. Trash and debris should also be removed at this time. Deep tilling can be used to break up a clogged surface area. Any tilled areas should be revegetated immediately. Sediment should be removed from the basin as necessary. Removal procedures should not take place until the floor of the basin is thoroughly dry. Light equipment, which will not compact the underlying soil, should be used to remove the top layer. The remaining soil should be deeply tilled, and revegetated as soon as possible. • Stormwater Management-Standards Stormwater Management Form This forma intended to ensure thatrprnposid stormwaiercontrol designs meet the stormwatermanagement • standards described,irrthe•DepartmenrcfEnvironmental'Protection'sStormwatir- as gement Policy(November 1996 with minor revisions March 1997). The Department of Environmental'Protecdon�(DEP)recommends that applicants submit this form with the Notice of Intent, as well as supporting documentation and plans, to provide stonnivater information for conservation.commission review.1f a.panicu/ar:stormwarermanagement standard cannot-be met information should be provided to demonstrate how adequate water quality and water quantity protection will be provided by the-projec "DEP encourages engineers to use this form to certify that the project meets the stormwater management standards as well as acceptable engineering standards. This form should be completed by checking the appropriate boxes for each standard and by signing and stamping the back of this form Project Location: 4 Technology Way, Salem The-proposed project is/is not(circle one)exempt from one or more of the stormwater management standards. If project is exempt,explain why: Stormwater runoff volumes to be treated for water quality are based on the following calculations: (check one that applies) ❑ 1 inch of runoff x total impervious area of postdevelopmentsite for critical areas (e.g., Outstanding Resource Waters and shellfish growing areas) 0.5 inches of runoff x total impervious.area of postdevelopment.site for other.resource areas r- Standard#2 Untreated stormwater (See plan 1 ® The project isdesigned so thatnew siormwater-conveyances(outfalls/di-scharges)do not discharge untreated stormwater into;'orcause erosion-to;wetlands or waters. a Standard#2: Post-development peak discharge rates (See plan- ® Post-development peak discharge rates do not exceed predevelopmentrates on the site either at the point of discharge or downgradient property boundary. ❑ N/A: project site contains waters subject to tidal action,so standard is not applicable. ® Stormwater controls have been designed for the 2-year and 10-year,24-hour storms. ® The project's stormwater design will not increase flooding impacts offsite from the 100-year, 24-hour storm. Standard#3: Recharge to groundwater (See plan ® The annual groundwater recharge for the post-development site approximates annual recharge from existing site conditions. ® Soil types have been identified according to either the U.S. Natural Resources Conservation Service(NRCS) County Soils Survey or onsite soil evaluation. Calculations on stormwater flow are based on a soil hydrologic group of R it r , and total impervious area of 354nn (square feet). I4� Soil types at each planned point of stormwater runoff infiltration include: CrC, chat field Hollis rock outcrop complex Hydrology group B & C ® Infiltration Best Management Practices (BMPs)used for this project include: I Standard#4: 80% TSS removal (See plan • The proposed stormwater management systems will remove 80%of the post-development site's average annual load of Total Suspended Solids (TSS). i The BMPs selected for this project include(list BMPs with TSS removal rates): Deep Sump Catch Basin((25%) Sediment Forebay (25%) Infiltration Basin (80%) 1-10 Stormwater Management (Volume One) Stormwater Management Standards Standard.#5: Higher potential pollutant loads (See-plan ❑ The project site does/does not(circle one)contain Land Uses with Higher Potential Pollutant Loads. If site.contains such land uses,describe: Stnrage of trucks & paving equipment • M If applicable,BMPs selected for controlling stormwater in these areas are designed to prevent infiltration of untreated stormwater and include: Deep sump catch basins, oil separator tank (2000gillon) , oil absorbant logs, forebay and infiltration pond. Standard#6:.Protection of critical areas (See plan 13 The project site does/does not(circle one)contain critical areas with sensitive resources. If site.contains critical areas, describe: ❑ If applicable,BMPs selected for stormwater discharges in these areas include: Standard#7: Redevelopment projects (See plan_) 13 The proposed activity is/is not(circle one)a redevelopment project: Note: Components of redevelopment projects which plan to develop previously undeveloped sites do not fall under the scope of Standard 7. ❑ If the project is a redevelopment project,the following stormwatermanagementstandards have been met: ❑ The standards which have not been met include: ❑ The proposed project will reduce the annual pollutant load on the site with new or expanded stormwater • controls. Standard#8:Erosion/sediment.control (See plan 13 Erosion and sediment controls are incorporated into the project design to prevent erosion, control sedi- ment movement,and stabilize exposed soils. Standard #9: Operation/maintenance plan (See plan 13 An operation and maintenance plan for both construction and post-development stormwater controls has been developed. The plan includes BMP owner(s);parries responsible for operation and maintenance; schedule for inspection and maintenance; routine and non-routine maintenance tasks; and provision for appropriate access and maintenance easements surrounding control(s) and extending to public right-of- way. -------------� I attest under the penalties of perjury that I have personally examined and am familiar with the information contained in this submittal,including any and all documents,accompanying this certification statement; and that I am fully authorized to make this attestation on behalf of the project applicant. i David Bramley Print Name Date (Stamp/Signature) Stormwater Management(Volume One) 1-11 ATLANTIC PAVING STORMWATER MANAGEMENT STANDARD 3: Recharge to Groundwater Proposed Impervious Area= 0.81 AC (Post)—0.55 AC (Pre) =0.26 AC Net Gain Paved Ledge HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP AREA (AQ Recharge Rate Volume A .00 (post) - .00(pre)= .00 x.4" = .00 AC IN B .15 (post)- .00(pre) = .15 x.25' = .037 C .11 (post)- .00(pre)= 1 I X .10" = .011 D .55 (post)- .55 (pre) = .00 Waive Total .048 A IN .004 AF Recharge Volume: from infiltration pond (B) .049 AC x 2.0 FT/D= .098 AF STANDARD 4: Water Ouality Volume Impervious Pond VI. Sediment Forebay** Pond Vol. Infiltration Pond Area WOV Al P Required Provided 4' Provided 0.l0A .81 A .033 AF .049 AF .0067 AF .032 AF .252 .092 48% Over * WQV Based on 0.5 x Impervious Area, Infiltration Rate (B) 0.5 — l"/hr. ** Sediment Forebay required based on 0.P' x Impervious Area DETENTION/STORAGE POND DATA OND NO.: A I PROJECT: Atlantic I MAP SCALE: 1"=20' AREA 35,400 SF= .8JAC STAGE VS. STORAGE 40'x110' = 4400 SF = 0.10 ACI AVE TotalELEV. (ft.) A (acres) A D (ft.) V. (acre ft.) V (acre ft.) MIN.acres74 .037 WQV . .049 2 .098 = .033 AF 76 .062 2 yr. @ .258' .077 2 .154 .252 + .209 78 .092 10 yr. @391 = .316 100 yr. —691 FOREBAY 3505=1225 SF = .56 76 .028 BMP .0083' .032 2 .066 .318 .0067 78 .037 INFILTRATION 20x80=1600SF 74 .037 .049 1 .049 76 .062 1" /hr. = 2'/Da .049 =.098AF/Day 3.2 Day RT 40x100 78 EL 30x90 76 20x80 74 INLET 1 12" SDR 35 (a) 79.5 INLET 4 INLET 2 INLET 5 INLET 3 INLET 6 OUTLETS. NO. TYPE M. DIA. WIDTH LENGTH N SLOPE ENT. Q. 1 V-Notch 78.0 15' 164. -D,-- .8 I PVC 75. 6" 30' .012 .020% ALC. BY: CHECKED BY: Location: 4 Technology Way, Salem, NIA A B C D E TSS Removal Starting TSS Amount Remaining BMP Rate 'Vo Load k Removed (BxQ Load (GD) Deep Sump WCatch Basin & 0.25 100* mg/I 25 75 W Oil Separafur a a Sediment 1 0.25 75 18 57 Forebay ZInt'iltralion 0.80 57 45 12 Basin 1 I TOTAL TSS REMOVAL = 0.88'%, Project: Atlantic Paving Co. * Equals load which enters the BMP Prepared By: Bruce Poole Date: July 20, 2004 4 TECHNOLOGY WAY OPERATION & MAINTENANCE PLAN *operation, success of the stormwater management plan depends on the proper implementation, operation, and maintenance of several management components. The following procedures shall be implemented to ensure success: 1. The contractor shall comply to the details of the parking lot, drainage system and control structures as shown on the plans. 2. All catch basins, sediment forebays, infiltration basins and detention ponds shall be inspected and cleaned as required in Table 1. 3. Effective erosion control measures during and after construction shall be maintained until a. stable turf is established on all altered areas. 4. The owner shall implement this maintenance plan to provide adequate quality control and to ensure the continued proper functioning and maintenance of these systems. 5. Access shall be maintained for equipment to maintain the treatment system components. . THE MAINTENANCE PLAN During Construction: Contractor constructing roadway and drainage system shall be responsible for maintaining the stormwater system Contact: (Bruce Poole, SP. Inc.) A qualified, agent of the developer shall conduct routine inspections of the: - construction of all stormwater management components at required intervals as P the project proceeds; - limit of construction work line; - completed sediment forebay and infiltration basin elevations; - stormwater treatment systems as well as all connections; - integrity of the erosion control. Once construction is complete, and the roadway and appurtenances are conveyed to the owner, who shall assume responsibility to operate and maintain the stormwater management components. An agent of the owner shall continue: - Inspections of sediment forebays, infiltration basins and detention ponds as • required in Table l Cleaning of catch basins as required in Table I - Sweeping of streets to prevent clogging of systems - Monitoring the erosion control systems until establishment of natural vegetation. 0 ))Maintenance Schedule for Drainage Structure Structure Inspection Maintenance Deep Sump Annually Sumps to be cleaned I time per year Catch Basin Sediment Forebay Annually To be cleaned 1 time per year Inspect Miler every major storm event Top of basin/pond shall be mowed twice during Infiltration Basin for first 3 months alien construction. grooving season and accumulated trash and debris & removed (June A-, October'). Delenlion Pond I'hereafier, annually Sediment to be removed as necessary. Sediment removal should not take place until bottom of basin is dry. Deep tilling can be used to break up clogged surface areas. Any tilled area to be revegetated inuirediately. Amended Massacha US Department of Environmental Protection 64-152 Bureau of Resource Protection— Wetlands DEP File Number WPA Form 3 - Notice of Intent E::::--:7 , Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 for OEP use only Please type or Print clearly all General Information information requested on this 1. -Applicant: 3. Property Owner(if different from applicant): form. Norman Dube Swampscott Realty L . L . 0 Name Name 117 Judge Road 290 Eliot Street Mading Aodress WhngAddiess Lynn Ashland . Cilygawn City/(oxn Mass , 01904 Mass . 01721 Slate lip Cade Sete lip Lede 1-781-842-3700 Phone Number 4. Summary of Project Impacts: faxNumbe(irappbabki a. Is any work being proposed in the Buffer Zone? E3 No ,�Yes E-MailAddiess(ilappliraD/e) If yes,how many sq.ft.? 2. Representative(if any): 25 , 000 s . f . Parsons and Faia Inc . Spuare fee firm Char 1 e s F a i a b.List the impacts of proposed activities on each wetland • contact— resource area(temporary and permanent impacts,prior to 60 Lewis Street restoration or mitigation): Mailing Address Lynn ,Mass . 01902 82spurce Area Size oflmoac (e.g., sq-ft.) Ciry/fdwn 0 Stare Zip Code 1-781-593-7927 Phone Number 1-781-593-0806 fax Number(if applicable) E-Mail AdOiess(ilapplirable) Project Description 1. Project Location: 2. Registry of Deeds: Salem South Essex • Gly/rown 4 Technologycounty Way Street AodreSs 7 Book part of Lot 79 Assessors t.12p/P l/ PamCUioV Page 74004 Massa:besetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection— Wetlands WPA Form 3 - Notice of Intent Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 Project Description (cont.) 3. Project Description: Construction of a blding 4. Plan and/or map references(list title and date): ui _ rnn rl S ' t Plan access and parkingareas and Yn Technology Way related earthwork within a Salem,Mass . buffer zone rExcavation of a April 30 , 2004 forebay & infiltration pond for Treatment of the parking and roof runoff. Activities Subject to Regulation 1. a. It Buffer to resource areas are to be impacted,in Land Under Water Bodies: whole or in part,check the applicable resource areas: 0 Square kermbe a/tdM InlandResource Are a ro ctal R cnn rn Are 0 • Cox Yards to De diva d 0Inland Bank ❑Coastal Beach ZBordering Vegetated Wetland 7 Barrier Beach Land Subject to Flooding: O Rocky Intertidal Shore Bordering: 0 O Coastal Dune Square feet to warla� 0 C Coastal Bank Cuorb Yards filled of&Wwwarw ❑Salt Marsh -Isolated: b. Proposed activities located,in whole or in part,in 0 Wetland Resource Area(s) (Complete all that apply): Sqw efeerro De ageed Inland Resource Areas 0 Cubic Yards filled adspbod Bank: coastal Re_ so_.c_=Are�c llnearfrettotoalalved Salt Marsh: n/a Bordering Vegetated Wetlands: 0 Square lee/rd be aferad 0 Square feel fobeall•1M Coastal Dune: • � 0 Square fres fo be replicareir areslaed Square ke(to c—!abere0 0 Cubic Yards/Ve:ume tole remaed mknwAffeft DepartaP w at Ewironmsnte/Proteeflon Bureau of Resource Protection—Wetlands WPA Form 3 - Notice of Intent • Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 Activities Subject to Regulation.(cont.) Land Under Ocean: n/a ii.Width of Rivertront Area(check one): $p1p"FW(0btAW 0 ❑ 25 feet-Designated Densely Developed Areas only ❑ 100 feet-New agricultural projects only Cubic rarosmhedidged ❑ 200 feet -all other projects iii.Mean annual high-water line determined by: Beach: (check all that apply) sQuaee Feermxelaym ❑ Changes in soil;vegetation;water marks;scouring ❑ Top of bank(inland rivers) ❑ First observable break in slope Rocky IntertiM Shore: C Mean annual flood level n/a C Mean high tide(for coastal rivers only) scum fttobeAWO iv.Distance of proposed activity closest to the mean annual high-water line: Land Under Salt Pond: Feet n/a Sau+re FarmOwltrr0 v.Total area(square feet)of Rivertrord Area on the site of Cubic YmEmYed"Qpe0 the proposed project: Coastal Bank Sqfe Fed n/a vi.Proposed afteration of Rivertront Area: LkXvFepmae&ikma row svw"raer Designated Port Area: n/a saukne Fe mMir;147a.nom lank swdrFedwarsaaev sou+mFamUeeo rruuazmrc aomomk Land Containing Shellfish: n/a 2. Bordering Vegetated Wetland Delineation:Explain the determination of Bordering Vegetated Wetland boundaries SOW FMmaekaere! - identified on plans: Fish Run: 17 Final Order of Resource Area Delineation issued by n/a conservation commission or DEP(attached) 64-152 ❑ DEP BVW Field Data Form(attached) LirmrFeermlrL�ed ❑ Other Method of Determining BVW boundary(Check all Riverboat Area n/a that apply and attach documentation): • ❑50%or more wetland indicator plants i.Name of waterway(if available): ❑Saturated/inundated conditions exist ❑Groundwater indicators C Direct observation Hydric soil indicators =Credible evidence of conditions prior to;disturbance �Rreat al Enrfrmwsata/pratactioa Bureau of Resource Protection— Wetlands WPA Form 3 - Notice of Intent Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 Activities Subject to Regulation (cont.) 3.Sites Subject to Special Protection b. Is any portion of the proposed project locatedwithin an a. Is any portion of the proposed project located within Area of Critical Environmental Concern(ACEC)? estimated habitat which is indicated on the most recent Estimated Habitat Map Of State-Listed Rare Wetland C Yes 3;No If yes,provide name of ACEC(see Wildlife published by the Natural Heritage and Endangered Appendix D for ACEC locations): Species Program? Yes )i No actc If yes,include proof of mailing or hand delivery of N01 to: Ogle al Map ACEC Program Department of Environmental Management If yes,include proof of mailing or hand delivery of N01 to: 100 Cambridge Street, 14th floor Gaston, AAA 02202 Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program c. Is any portion of the site subject to a Wetlands Division of Fisheries and Wildlife Restriction Order under the Inland Wetlands Restriction Act 100 Cambridge Street (M.G.L c. 131,S.40A)or Coastal Wetlands Restriction Act Boston,MA 02202 (M.G.L c. 131,s.105)? C Yes �IxNo If Yes,attach a copy of the Restriction Order to the NOL • ' Performance Standards 1• Is any portion of the proposed activity eligible to be treated b•Was the lot where the activity is proposed created prior to as a limited project subject to 310 CMR 1024 ar 310 CMR August 1,1996? 10.53? C Yes C No C Yes FV No If yes,describe which limited project applies to this project: 4. a. Describe how the project will meet all performance standards for each Of the resource areas altered,Including standards requiring consideration of alternative project design or location. Attach additional cheptS if n r,ce, no alteration 2. Is any activity within any Resource Area or Butter Zone exempt from performance standards of the wetlands regulations,310 CMR 10.00. C Yes ,X No It yes,describe which exemption applies to this project: b. Stormwater Management: The project is exempt from the DEP Stormwater Policy: Yes X No If yes,explain why the project is exempt: 3. a. Is the project located in the Rivertront Area:. C Yes 3 No If yes,indicate the proposed project purpose: Single family home C Residential subdivision C Commercial development If no,stormwater management measures are requlrj:d.: Industrial development Applicants are encouraged to complete G Transportation Stormwater Man=�omo��c •m - Other-describe: and submit R with trye Notice of Intent. Massachusetts oepadment of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection—Wetlands WPA Form 3 - Notice of Intent Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40. Additional Information Applicant must include all the following with this Notice of Intent: • USGS or other map of the area(along with a narrative description,if necessary), containing sufficient information for the conservation commission and the Department to locate the site. • Plans identifying the location of proposed activities(including activities proposed to serve as a BVW replication area or other mitigating measure)relative to the boundaries of each affected resource area. • Other material identifying and explaining the determination of resource area boundaries shown on plans (e.g.,a DEP BVW Field Data Form). • List of the titles and final revision dates of all plans and other material submitted with this N01. Fees The fees for work proposed under each Notice of Intent must Applicants must submit the following information(in be calculated and submitted to the conservation commission addition to pages 1 and 2 of Appendix B)to confirm fee and the Department(see the Instructions and Appendix B: payment: Wetland Fee Transmittal form). No fee shall be assessed for projects of the federal governChelik dA - ment,the Department of Environmental Protection,or cities ' R— and towns of the Commonwealth. �dj°"�"°0" • utt l oR n"fro.e $ Applaanr name frarreex rran moral Signatures and Submittal Requirements I hereby certify under the penalties of perjury that the For conservation commission: foregoing Notice of Intent and accompanying plans,docu- Two copies of the completed Notice of Intent(Form 3), ments,and supporting data are true and complete to the best including supporting plans and documents;two copies of of my knowledge.I understand that the conservation commis- pages 1 and 2 of Appendix B;and the city/town fee payment sion will place notification of this Notice in a local newspaper must be sent to the conservation commission by certified mail at the expense of the applicant in accordance with the wetlands or hand delivery. regulations,310 CMO 10.05(5)(a). For OEP: I further certify under penalties of perjury that all abutters were Two copies of the completed Notice of Intent(Form 3), notified of this application,pursuant to the requirements of including supporting plans and documents;two copies of M.G.L. c.472 of the Massachusetts Acts of 1993.Notice must pages 1 and 2 of Appendix 8;and a copy of the state fee be made in writing by hand delivery or certified mail(return payment must be sent to the DEP regional office by certified receipt requested)to all abutters within 100 feet of the mail or hand delivery(see Appendix A for regional office property line of the project location. addresses). Other. If the applicant has checked the"yes"box in any part of rrr :,-r n,tr Section C, Item 3,above,refer to that section and the Instruc- liuus lur additional submittal requirements. s;pna(ure orprapenyawne, The original and copies must be sent simultaneously.Failure by Date the applicant to send copies in a timely y manner may result in dismissal of the Notice of Intent. Sigr:;;,:•a elrepresinfauce Oare ONE- r Water Quality Inlets/Deep Sump Catch Basins f ' : I The deep sump catch basin operates in a similar manner. Functioning as a modified catch basin, the deep sump design has the stormwater runoff inflow at the top of the basin. The discharge point is located at least 4 feet below the inflow point. Generally, the volume rule is to size the sump four 'a times the diameter of the inflow pipe. Stormwater flows through screened orifices to the chamber, which may contain a permanent pool of water. The stormwater must pass through the bottom opening of an inverted pipe. Oil and grease float on the permanent pool water, and are trapped in the chamber. Eventually, the oil and grease will attach to sediment and settle out. -i + Removable Grate i!. ±r: Inlet Oil and Grease 41, float on Surtace ► I: ♦ Outlet f�... Diameter of inflow i pioepX 4 II settled solids i Figure 3.I.2: Schematic Design of a Deep Sump Catch Basin Purpose • To remove debris, sediment and hydrocarbons from stormwater runoff. • To provide pretreatment for other BMPs. `'• In retrofit situations. to provide water quality treatment for small urban a' lots where larger 13NIPs are not feasible due to site constraints. 3.1 - 2 Stormwater Manacement (Volume Two) A - LENGTH '- f -17 .r----------------------------- -- • I 11 1 I II 1 I II 1 I II I I II I I 11 (Dill �III I II I I II I 13' X IY 18• DIA I I I MSPECTION COVER UMWT COVER —TJ1-----------------------------� 3 - 4' AMC PIPE SEAL KNDIXWTS J 'TAPER 4• INLEE �� J. VENT 4" OUII ig • is LIW®IEYFI z � `o 10 4• PVC WTIET TEE 0 BAFFLE 3• o NOTES 1. CONCRETE: 4000 PSI AFTER 28 DAYS. 4. KEYED JOINT SEALED WITH BUTYL RUBBER. 2. REINFORCING: 6X6/10X10 W.W.M. & FlBERS 5. EXCAVATION MUST BE AT LEAST 12' WIDER 3. HEAVY DUTY SEPTIC TANK TOPS AND LONGER THAN TANK SIZE. REINFORCED WITH 5/8' REBAR 0 12' O.C., EACH WAY. ISTTEDM. NH0.. UQUID A 8 C CAPACITY LENGTH WIDTH HEIGHT INVEDRTWFGHT SUPERIOR 110OG 1100H 500 8'—o' 4'—o' 4'-o' '-21/212,800 m5. , CONCRETE CO, INC. 1101G 1101H 750 8'4 4'-0' 5'-4' 4'-6 1/2 ,600 lbs. AUBURN, ML. 1103G 1103H 1000 5-0' 5'-1" 5-4' 4'-6 1/218400 lbs. • 1105G 1105H 1500 10'-6' 6'-4• 5'-4' 4'-5 1000 lbs. PRECAST CONCRETE 1106G 1106HI 2000 1 10'4 6'4' 6'-2' 1 5'-3' 12500 lbs. RESiDEN TIAL GREASE TRAP I SUPERIOR CONCRETE CO., INC. — AUBURN. MAINE 04210 PAGE I A3 SHEA CONCRETE PRODUCTS TEL. (508) 658-2645 MINI CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES OPTIONAL 18°DIA CAST IRON FRAME AND COVER 24DIA CONE 18DIA 18 SEE 24° NOTE I (ALL JOINTS) -SECTION � ��+- - - RISER • D1A 12,24;OR 36° AS REG D SUMP 30� 12; 24;OR 36° DIA AS RED'D - - `"- - 24.. L36 11 DIA BASE (BOTH BASINS) 8°DIA KNOCKOUTS 4 EACH AT 900 APART CROSS SECTION VIEWS NOTES: I. 3I FLAT JOINT SEALED WITH BUTYL RESIN OR MORTOR. SCALE: I°= 2' 2. FLAT CONICAL COVER WITH CLEANOUT CAN BE USED DWN BY: P.(944-5983) IN PLACE OF CONE, CAST IRON COVER AND FRAME. (944-5983) (2S) s 1S D # 1 • Subca Reach on Llnk Orainage Diagram for and desigrML2years-Atlantic Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. 7=0004 rHydroCAD®6.10 sln 002234 ®1986-2002 Applied Microcomputer Systems und_design#2_2years-Atlantic Type 11124-hrRainfa11=3.10" Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 1 • HydroCAD®6.10 s/n 002234 ©1986-2002 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/22/2004 Time span=0.10-30.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 599 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Type III 24-hr Rainfall=3.10" Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: Design #2 Runoff Area=0.465 ac Runoff Depth=2.35" Length=390' Tc=5.1 min CN=93 Runoff= 1.24 cfs 0.091 of Subcatchment 25: (new Subcat) Runoff Area=1.340 ac Runoff Depth=1.08" Length=360' Tc=12.2 min CN=76 Runoff= 1.31 cfs 0.121 of Link D#1: Design #2 Inflow=2.25 cfs 0.212 of Primary=2.25 cfs 0.212 of Total Runoff Area = 1.805 ac Runoff Volume = 0.212 of Average Runoff Depth = 1.41" • • und_design#2_2years-Atlantic Type I/124-hrRainfa//=3.10" Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 2 • HydroCAD®6.10 s/n 002234 O 1986-2002 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/22/2004 Subcatchment 1S: Design #2 [49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt Runoff = 1.24 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 0.091 af, Depth= 2.35' Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.10-30.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr Rainfall=3.10" Area (ac) CN Description 0.380 98 Ledge 0.073 67 Brush Poor 0.012 98 Wetlands 0.465 93 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 1.3 180 0.0550 2.3 Sheet Flow, Ledge D Smooth surfaces n= 0.011 P2= 3.10" 0.1 30 0.2000 4.5 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Rip Rap Nearly Bare & Untilled Kv= 10.0 fps 3.7 180 0.0030 0.8 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Wetlands • Grassed Waterway Kv= 15.0 fps 5.1 390 Total Subcatchment 1S: Design #2 Hydrograph 1.24 cfs 12.07 hrs 07 • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Time (hours) und_design#2_2years-Atlantic Type 11124-hr Rainfall=3.10" Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 3 • HydroCAD®6.10 s/n 002234 ©1986-2002 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/22/2004 Subcatchment 2S: (new Subcat) Runoff = 1.31 cfs @ 12.18 hrs, Volume= 0.121 af, Depth= 1.08" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.10-30.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr Rainfall=3.10" Area (ac) CN Description 0.150 55 Woods, Good, HSG B 0.170 98 Ledge 0.690 67 Brush, Poor, HSG B 0.110 78 Rip Rap 0.220 98 Wetlands 1.340 76 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 1.2 200 0.0800 2.7 Sheet Flow, Brush & Ledge Smooth surfaces n= 0.011 P2= 3.10" 4.1 100 0.0200 0.4 Sheet Flow, Brush Fallow n= 0.050 P2= 3.10" 6.9 60 0.1300 0.1 Sheet Flow, Woodland Woods: Light underbrush n= 0.400 P2= 3.10" 12.2 360 Total Subcatchment 2S: (new Subcat) Hydrograph 1.31 cfs LO 12.18 hrs 0 . .. JL .. .. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 115 16117 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 2_._. ..,, • 5 26 27 28 29 30 Time hours i und_design#2_2years-Atlantic Type ]//24-hr Rainfall=3.10" Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 4 • HydroCAD®6.10 s/n 002234 @ 1986-2002 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/22/2004 Link D #1: Design #2 Inflow Area = 1.805 ac, Inflow Depth = 1.41" Inflow = 2.25 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.212 of Primary = 2.25 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.212 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary outflow= Inflow, Time Span= 0.10-30.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Link D #1: Design #2 Hydrograph ■Inflow 2.25 cfs 0 12.12 hrs 0 Primary 2.25 cfs 0 12.12 hrs 2 i 0-1 e , 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 S 9 10 i1 12 i3 14 19 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Time (hours) • i • (2S) • (is D �# 1 • Subca Reach on Liflk Drainage Diagram for and design#2_t0years-Atlantic Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. 7/2212004 HydroCAD®6.10 s/n 002234 ®1986-2002 Applied Microcomputer Systems und_design#2_10years-Atlantic Type 11124-hrRainfa11=4.70" Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 1 • HydroCAD®6.10 s/n 002234 ©1986-2002 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/22/2004 Time span=5.00-30.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 501 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Type III 24-hr Rainfall=4.70" Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: Design#2 Runoff Area=0.465 ac Runoff Depth=3.89" Length=390' Tc=4.9 min CN=93 Runoff=2.03 cfs 0.151 of Subcatchment 2S: (new Subcat) Runoff Area=1.340 ac Runoff Depth=2.29" Length=360' Tc=10.0 min CN=76 Runoff=3.10 cfs 0.256 of Link D#1: Design #2 Inflow=4.78 cfs 0.407 of Primary=4.78 cfs 0.407 of Total Runoff Area = 1.805 ac Runoff Volume = 0.407 of Average Runoff Depth = 2.70" • • und_design#210years-Atlantic Type 111 24-hr Rainfall=4.70" Prepared by SP_Engineering, Inc. Page 2 • HydroCAD®6.10 s/n 002234 ©1986-2002 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/22/2004 Subcatchment 1S: Design #2 [49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt Runoff = 2.03 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 0.151 af, Depth= 3.89" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-30.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr Rainfall=4.70" Area (ac) CN Description 0.380 98 Ledge 0.073 67 Brush Poor 0.012 98 Wetlands 0.465 93 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 1.1 180 0.0550 2.8 Sheet Flow, Ledge D Smooth surfaces n= 0.011 P2= 4.70" 0.1 30 0.2000 4.5 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Rip Rap Nearly Bare & Untitled Kv= 10.0 fps 3.7 180 0.0030 0.8 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Wetlands . Grassed Waterway Kv= 15.0 fps 4.9 390 Total Subcatchment 1S: Design #2 Hydrograph 2.03 cfs 12.07 hrs 2 - � r • 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Time (hours) und_design#2_10years-Atlantic Type 11124-hrRainfall=4.70" Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 3 . HydroCAD®6.10 s/n 002234 ©1986-2002 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/22/2004 Subcatchment 2S: (new Subcat) Runoff = 3.10 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.256 af, Depth= 2.29" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-30.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr Rainfall=4.70" Area (ac) CN Description 0.150 55 Woods, Good, HSG B 0.170 98 Ledge 0.690 67 Brush, Poor, HSG B 0.110 78 Rip Rap 0.220 98 Wetlands 1.340 76 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 1.0 200 0.0800 3.3 Sheet Flow, Brush & Ledge Smooth surfaces n= 0.011 P2= 4.70" 3.4 100 0.0200 0.5 Sheet Flow, Brush Fallow n= 0.050 P2= 4.70" 5.6 60 0.1300 0.2 Sheet Flow, Woodland • Woods: Light underbrush n= 0.400 P2= 4.70" 10.0 360 Total Subcatchment 2S: (new Subcat) Hydrograph I o Rm,un 3.10 cfs 12.15 hrs 3 2 O 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 1 (h18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2... 6 27 28 29 30 and design#2_10years-Atlantic Type 111 24-hr Rainfall=4.70" Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 4 • HydroCAD®6.10 s/n 002234 ©1986-2002 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/22/2004 Link D #1: Design #2 Inflow Area = 1.805 ac, Inflow Depth = 2.70" Inflow = 4.78 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 0.407 of Primary = 4.78 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 0.407 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary outflow= Inflow, Time Span= 5.00-30.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Link D #1: Design #2 Hydrograph 4.78 cfs 12.11 rs d Primary 5 4.78 cfs Cc 12.11 hrs . 4- j2 _u 3 LL 0 , 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 i2 13 14 15 16 17 18 1,9 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Time (hours) 2S A • 1S D # 1 • SUbce Reach ort. �jflk Drainage Diagram for and desigrd{2_100years-Atiantie Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. 7/222004 HydroGAD®6.10 s/n 002234 ®1986-2002 Applied Microcomputer Systems und_design#2100years-Atlantic Type III24-hrRainfall=8.30" Prepared by SP_Engineering, Inc. Page 1 • HydroCAD®6.10 sin 002234 m 1986-2002 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/22/2004 Time span=5.00-30.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 501 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Type III 24-hr Rainfall=8.30" Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: Design #2 Runoff Area=0.465 ac Runoff Depth=7.37" Length=390' Tc=4.6 min CN=93 Runoff=3.79 cfs 0.286 of Subcatchment 2S: (new Subcat) Runoff Area=1.340 ac Runoff Depth=5.43" Length=360' Tc=7.5 min CN=76 Runoff=7.95 cfs 0.607 of Link D#1: Design#2 Inflow= 11.42 cfs 0.892 of Primary= 11.42 cfs 0.892 of Total Runoff Area = 1.805 ac Runoff Volume =0.892 of Average Runoff Depth = 5.93" • • und_design#2100years-Atlantic Type 111 24-hr Rainfall=8.30" Prepared by SP_Engineering, Inc. Page 2 • HydroCAD®6.10 s/n 002234 ©1986-2002 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/22/2004 Subcatchment 1S: Design #2 [49[ Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt Runoff = 3.79 cfs @ 12.06 hrs,,Volume= 0.286 af, Depth= 7.37' Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-30.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr Rainfall=8.30" Area (ac) CN Description 0.380 98 Ledge 0.073 67 Brush Poor 0.012 98 Wetlands 0.465 93 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 0.8 180 0.0550 3.7 Sheet Flow, Ledge D Smooth surfaces n= 0.011 P2= 8.30" 0.1 30 0.2000 4.5 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Rip Rap Nearly Bare & Untilled Kv= 10.0 fps 3.7 180 0.0030 0.8 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Wetlands . Grassed Waterway Kv= 15.0 fps 4.6 390 Total Subcatchment 1S: Design #2 Hydrograph 4- 13.79 cfs Cc.. .12.06hrs W 2 L )L ......%- 0i 5 6..,7....8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1Time (hours(9 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 • 27 28 29 30 und_design#2_100years-Atlantic Type 11124-hrRainfall=8.30" Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 3 • HydroCAD®6.10 s/n 002234 ©1986-2002 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/22/2004 Subcatchment 2S: (new Subcat) Runoff = 7.95 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 0.607 af, Depth= 5.43" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-30.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr Rainfall=8.30" Area (ac) CN Description 0.150 55 Woods, Good, HSG B 0.170 98 Ledge 0.690 67 Brush, Poor, HSG B 0.110 78 Rip Rap 0.220 98 Wetlands 1.340 76 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 0.8 200 0.0800 4.4 Sheet Flow, Brush& Ledge Smooth surfaces n= 0.011 P2= 8.30" 2.5 100 0.0200 0.7 Sheet Flow, Brush Fallow n= 0.050 P2= 8.30" 4.2 60 0.1300 0.2 Sheet Flow, Woodland • Woods: Light underbrush n= 0.400 P2= 8.30" 7.5 360 Total Subcatchment 2S: (new Subcat) Hydrograph • .,. '. ,. _ D Runoff 7.95c1s 12.11hrs -- -- - .- 8 7 6. LL 4 0 , • 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Time (hours) und_design#2_100years-Atlantic Type 11124-hrRainfall=8.30" Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 4 • HydroCAD®6.10 s/n 002234 © 1986-2002 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/22/2004 Link D #1: Design #2 Inflow Area = 1.805 ac, Inflow Depth = 5.93" Inflow = 11.42 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.892 of Primary = 11.42 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.892 A Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary outflow= Inflow, Time Span= 5.00-30.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Link D #1: Design #2 Hydrograph 12 11.4242 f 121._ 1 2. 0 Primary � ,. 0 Prima 09 hrs --- --- '. tt- 7 .. - - • 5 _ J , r : 1 0 3 6 7 8 9 10 ii i2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 23 26 27 28 29 30 Time (hours) • • (2S) 4ip 1S D # 1 • SUbca ReachOn Link Drainage Diagram for Dev_design#1_2years-Atlantic Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. 7!22/2004 HydroCAD®6.10 s/n 002234 m 1986-2002 Applied Microcomputer Systems Dev_design#1_2year's-Atlantic Type 11124-hr Rainfall=3.10" Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 1 • HydroCAD®6.10 s/n 002234 01986-2002 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/22/2004 Time span=0.10-30.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 599 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Type III 24-hr Rainfall=3.10" Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: Area Flows Into Design Point#1 Runoff Area=0.085 ac Runoff Depth=0.82" Length=290' Tc=8.6 min CN=71 Runoff=0.07 cfs 0.006 of Subcatchment 2S: Area Flows To Design Point#1 Runoff Area=0.802 ac Runoff Depth=2.87" Length=230' Tc=2.9 min CN=98 Runoff=2.61 cfs 0.192 of Pond 1P: (Infiltration pond . Peak Storage=0.086 of c@ 75.73' Inflow=2.61 cfs 0.192 of Discarded=0.06 cfs 0.097 of Primary=0.52 cfs 0.075 of Outflow=0.58 cfs 0.172 of Link D#1: Design Point#1 Inflow=0.55 cfs 0.081 of Primary=0.55 cfs 0.081 of Total Runoff Area =0.887 ac Runoff Volume= 0.197 of Average Runoff Depth = 2.67" • Dev_design#1_2years-Atlantic Type 111 24-hr Rainfall=3.10" Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 2 HydroCADO 6.10 s/n 002234 O 1986-2002 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/22/2004 Subcatchment 1S: Area Flows Into Design Point #1 Runoff = 0.07 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.006 af, Depth= 0.82" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.10-30.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr Rainfall=3.10" Area (ac) CN Description 0.073 67 Brush, Poor, HSG B 0.012 98 Wetlands 0.085 71 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 4.8 80 0.0800 0.3 Sheet Flow, Driveway to wetlands Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.10" 0.1 30 0.2000 4.5 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Rip rap Nearly Bare & Untilled Kv= 10.0 fps 3.7 180 0.0030 0.8 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Wetlands Grassed Waterway Kv= 15.0 fps 8.6 290 Total Subcatchment 1S: Area Flows Into Design Point #1 Hydrograph 0.07 4hrs ._ _.. cs ORunofF -fo -- -- - 0.065. - 0.06- . : 0.055- 0.05 0.045- -- ___ 'U 0.04 0.035 : - L -- - - - LL 0.03 :0.025- 0.02 0.0150.00.005 - % ; ; 11 .. J 0 1 Z 3 4 5 6 7 5 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 15 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 26 29 30 Time (hours) • i Dev_design#1_2years-Atlantic Type 111 24-hr Rainfall=3.10" Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 3 • HydroCAD®6.10 s/n 002234 ©1986-2002 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/22/2004 Subcatchment 2S: Area Flows To Design Point #1 [49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt Runoff = 2.61 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 0.192 af, Depth= 2.87" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.10-30.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr Rainfall=3.10" Area (ac) CN Description 0.022 98 Ledge 0.220 98 Building Roof 0.560 98 Paved parking & new driveway 0.802 98 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description _ (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 2.8 200 0.0100 1.2 Sheet Flow, Parking Lot Smooth surfaces n= 0.011 P2= 3.10" 0.1 30 0.0200 6.9 5.46 Circular Channel (pipe), Separator to pond Diam= 12.0" Area= 0.8 sf Perim= 3.1' r- 0.25' n= 0.012 2.9 230 Total • Subcatchment 2S: Area Flows To Design Point #1 Hydrograph 2.61 dsLB 12.05 hrs Z Li L 0 . ,. .. ,. 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 16 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Time (hours) • Dev_design#1_2years-Atlantic Type 1/124-hr Rainfall=3.10" Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 4 • HydroCADO 6.10 s/n 002234 O 1986-2002 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/22/2004 Pond 1P: (Infiltration pond [92] Warning: Device#2 is above defined storage Inflow Area= 0.802 ac, Inflow Depth = 2.87" Inflow = 2.61 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 0.192 of Outflow = 0.58 cfs @ 12.42 hrs, Volume= 0.172 af, Atten= 78%, Lag= 22.2 min Discarded = 0.06 cfs @ 12.42 hrs, Volume= 0.097 of Primary = 0.52 cfs @ 12.42 hrs, Volume= 0.075 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.10-30.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 75.73' Surf.Area= 0.059 ac Storage= 0.086 of Plug-Flow detention time= 246.4 min calculated for 0.172 of(90% of inflow) Storage and wetted areas determined by Prismatic sections Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (acres) (acre-feet) (acre-feet) 74.00 0.037 0.000 0.000 76.00 0.062 0.099 0.099 78.00 0.092 0.154 0.253 Discarded OutFlow Max--0.06 cfs @ 12.42 hrs HW=75.73' (Free Discharge) . L3=.pond (Controls 0.06 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.52 cfs @ 12.42 hrs HW=75.73' (Free Discharge) L1=Culvert (Controls 0.52 cfs) 2=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir (Controls 0.00 cfs) # Routing Invert Outlet Devices 1 Primary 75.00' 6.0" x 30.0' long Culvert CMP, projecting, no headwall, Ke= 0.900 Outlet Invert= 74.50' S= 0.0167T n= 0.015 Cc= 0.900 2 Primary 78.00' 16.0' long x 2.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 Coef. (English) 2.54 2.61 2.61 2.60 2.66 2.70 2.77 2.89 2.88 2.85 3.07 3.20 3.32 3 Discarded 0.00' 0.001400 fpm .pond over entire Surface area t • Dev_design#1_2years-Atlantic Type ///24-hr Rainfall=3.10" Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 5 • HydroCAD®6.10 s/n 002234 ©1986-2002 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/22/2004 Pond 1P: (Infiltration pond Hydrograph 2.61 ds 12 05 hrs 1 O InBow 13 Outflow 0 Discarded 17 Primary 2- . t 10.58 ds @ 12.42 hrs� 0.52 cfs 12.42 hrs 0.06 u 2 hrs., o- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1011 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 • Time )hours) Dev_design#1_2years-Atlantic Type ///24-hr Rainfall=3.10" Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 6 • HydroCAD®6.10 s/n 002234 ©1986-2002 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/22/2004 Link D #1: Design Point#1 Inflow Area = 0.887 ac, Inflow Depth = 1.09" Inflow = 0.55 cfs @ 12.38 hrs, Volume= 0.081 of Primary = 0.55 cfs @ 12.38 hrs, Volume= 0.081 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary outflow= Inflow, Time Span= 0.10-30.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Link D#1: Design Point#1 Hydrograph ■Inflow 0.55 cfs 1 .38 hrs ■Primary 0.6 0.55 cfs 12.38 hrs I - oss - - os. 0.45- 0.4-, .45 w 0.35 LL v 0.25 r 0.2- 0.150.1 0.05 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 i7 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2'6 27 28 2'0 3b Time (hours) • • (2S) • 1P 1S D # 1 • SUbCa Reach. on L�flk Drainage Diagram for Dev_design#1 10years-Atlantic Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. 7/22/2004 HydroCAD®6.10 sm 002234 ®1986-2002 Applied Microcomputer Systems Dev_design#1_10years-Atlantic Type I/124-hrRainfall=4.70" Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 1 . HydroCAD®6.10 s/n 002234 ©1986-2002 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/22/2004 Time span=0.10-30.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 599 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Type III 24-hr Rainfall=4.70" Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: Area Flows Into Design Point#1 Runoff Area=0.193 ac Runoff Depth=3.19" Length=290' Tc=7.7 min CN=86 Runoff=0.66 cfs 0.051 of Subcatchment 2S: Area Flows To Design Point#1 Runoff Area=0.802 ac Runoff Depth=4.46" Length=230' Tc=2.4 min CN=98 Runoff=4.01 cfs 0.298 of Pond 1P: infiltration Pond Peak Storage=0.131 of @ 76.42' Inflow=4.01 cfs 0.298 of Discarded=0.07 cfs 0.107 of Primary=0.81 cfs 0.166 of Outflow=0.88 cfs 0.273 of Link D#1: Design Point#1 Inflow= 1.41 cfs 0.217 of Primary= 1.41 cfs 0.217 of Total Runoff Area= 0.995 ac Runoff Volume= 0.350 of Average Runoff Depth =4.22" • • Dev_design#1_10years-Atlantic Type ll/24-hr Rainfall=4.70" Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 2 • HydroCAD®6.10 s/n 002234 ©1986-2002 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/22/2004 Subcatchment 1S: Area Flows Into Design Point #1 Runoff = 0.66 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 0.051 af, Depth= 3.19" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.10-30.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr Rainfall=4.70" Area (ac) CN Description 0.073 67 Brush, Poor, HSG B 0.120 98 Wetlands 0.193 86 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 3.9 80 0.0800 0.3 Sheet Flow, Driveway to wetlands Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2=4.70" 0.1 30 0.2000 4.5 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Rip rap Nearly Bare & Untilled Kv= 10.0 fps 3.7 180 0.0030 0.8 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Wetlands Grassed Waterway Kv= 15.0 fps 7.7 290 Total • Subcatchment 1S: Area Flows Into Design Point #1 Hydrograph 0.7- 0.6- 0.55. .7 0.6 0.55 0.45 _ : w p 0.35. - . LL 0.3 0.25- 0.2- 7 0.15- 0.1 - - - 0.05 - 0- 1 .2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Time (hours) • Dev_design#1_10years-Atlantic Type 11124-hrRainfall=4.70" Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 3 • HydroCAD®6.10 sin 002234 © 1986-2002 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/22/2004 Subcatchment 2S: Area Flows To Design Point #1 [49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt Runoff = 4.01 cfs @ 12.04 hrs, Volume= 0.298 af, Depth= 4.46" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.10-30.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr Rainfall=4.70" Area (ac) CN Description 0.022 98 Ledge 0.220 98 Building Roof 0.560 98 Paved parking & new driveway 0.802 98 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (fl/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 2.3 200 0.0100 1.5 Sheet Flow, Parking Smooth surfaces n= 0.011 P2= 4.70" 0.1 30 0.0200 6.9 5.46 Circular Channel (pipe), Separator to pond Diam= 12.0" Area= 0.8 sf Perim= 3.1' r— 0.25' n= 0.012 2.4 230 Total Subcatchment 2S: Area Flows To Design Point #1 Hydrograph 4.01 cfs 0 12.04 hrs -�- - -. - ._- 4 Y 3- 2- 2 2 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Time (hours) • Dev_design#1_10years-Atlantic Type 11124-hrRainfall=4.70" Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 4 • HydroCAD®6.10 s/n 002234 ©1986-2002 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/22/2004 Pond 1P: infiltration Pond [92] Warning: Device#2 is above defined storage Inflow Area = 0.802 ac, Inflow Depth = 4.46" Inflow = 4.01 cfs @ 12.04 hrs, Volume= 0.298 of Outflow = 0.88 cfs @ 12.41 hrs, Volume= 0.273 af, Atten= 78%, Lag= 22.2 min Discarded = 0.07 cfs @ 12.41 hrs, Volume= 0.107 of Primary = 0.81 cfs @ 12.41 hrs, Volume= 0.166 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.10-30.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 76.42' Surf.Area= 0.068 ac Storage= 0.131 of Plug-Flow detention time= 191.6 min calculated for 0.273 of(91% of inflow) Storage and wetted areas determined by Prismatic sections Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (acres) (acre-feet) (acre-feet) 74.00 0.037 0.000 0.000 76.00 0.062 0.099 0.099 78.00 0.092 0.154 0.253 Discarded OutFlow Max=0.07 cfs @ 12.41 hrs HW=76.42' (Free Discharge) • L3=Exfltration (Controls 0.07 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.81 cfs @ 12.41 hrs HW=76.42' (Free Discharge) L1=Culvert (Controls 0.81 cfs) 2=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir (Controls 0.00 cfs) # Routing Invert Outlet Devices 1 Primary 75.00' 6.0" x 30.0' long Culvert CMP, projecting, no headwall, Ke= 0.900 Outlet Invert= 74.50' S= 0.0167'P n= 0.015 Cc= 0.900 2 Primary 78.00' 2.0' long x 15.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coef. (English) 2.68 2.70 2.70 2.64 2.63 2.64 2.64 2.63 3 Discarded 0.00' 0.001400 fpm Exfltration over entire Surface area • Dev_design#1_10years-Atlantic Type ll!24-hr Rainfall=4.70" Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 5 HydroCAD®6.10 s/n 002234 ©1986-2002 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/22/2004 Pond 1P: infiltration Pond Hydrograph 4.01 cfs 12.04 hrs - _ O Inflow ®Outflow 0 Discarded . O Primary 4- 3- 2- 12.41 312.41 hrs 1 0.81 cfs 12.41 hrs :::i .. . 0.07 hrs :'a 0- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 . Time (hours) • Dev_design#1_10years-Atlantic Type 11124-hrRainfall=4.70" Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 6 • HydroCAD®6.10 sin 002234 ©1986-2002 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/22/2004 Link D #1: Design Point#1 Inflow Area = 0.995 ac, Inflow Depth = 2.62" Inflow = 1.41 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.217 of Primary = 1.41 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.217 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary outflow= Inflow, Time Span= 0.10-30.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Link D #1: Design Point #1 Hydrograph Fo– rl Inflow —41cfs 12.12 hrs 0 Primary 1.41 cfs 12.12 hrs O-L -11 1 i 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 fc ii 12 13 14 is i6 17 18 19 26 21 22 23 24 2s 26 27 28 29 30 Time (hours) • • 2S • 1P (is) D # 1 • SubCe- Reach on. Lj�k Drainage Diagram for Dev_deslgn#1 100years-Atlantic Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. 7/22/2004 HydroCADID 6.10 s/n 002234 ®1966-2002 Applied Microcomputer Systems Dev_design#1_100years-Atlantic Type 11124-hrRainfall=8.30" Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 1 • HydroCAD®6.10 s/n 002234 ©1986-2002 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/22/2004 Time span=0.10-30.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 599 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Type III 24-hr Rainfall=8.30" Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: Area Flows Into Design Point#1 Runoff Area=0.085 ac Runoff Depth=4.84" Length=290' Tc=6.7 min CN=71 Runoff= 0.46 cfs 0.034 of Subcatchment 2S: Area Flows To Design Point#1 Runoff Area=0.802 ac Runoff Depth=8.06" Length=230' Tc=1.8 min CN=98 Runoff=7.09 cfs 0.539 of Pond 1P: Infiltration pond Peak Storage=0.226 of @ 77.65' Inflow=7.09 cfs 0.539 of Discarded=0.09 cfs 0.122 of Primary= 1.14 cfs 0.388 of Outflow= 1.23 cfs 0.509 of Link D#1: Design Point#1 Inflow= 1.51 cfs 0.422 of Primary= 1.51 cfs 0.422 of Total Runoff Area =0.887 ac Runoff Volume= 0.573 of Average Runoff Depth = 7.75" • • Dev_design#1_100yeam-Atlantic Type ll/24-hr Rainfall=8.30" Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 2 • HydroCAD®6.10 s/n 002234 ©1986-2002 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/22/2004 Subcatchment 1S: Area Flows Into Design Point #1 Runoff = 0.46 cfs @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 0.034 af, Depth= 4.84" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.10-30.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr Rainfall=8.30" Area (ac) CN Description 0.073 67 Brush, Poor, HSG B 0.012 98 Wetlands 0.085 71 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 2.9 80 0.0800 0.5 Sheet Flow, Driveway to wetlands Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 8.30" 0.1 30 0.2000 4.5 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Rip rap Nearly Bare& Untilled Kv= 10.0 fps 3.7 180 0.0030 0.8 Shallow Concentrated Flow,Wetlands Grassed Waterway Kv= 15.0 fps 6.7 290 Total • Subcatchment 1S: Area Flows Into Design Point #1 Hydrograph 0.5- l0.46diO. 12.10hrs1. . 0.45- 0.4- F .45 0.4 - - - - e 0.25 LL 0.2- 0.15- 0.1 .-_. 0.05 IL .:. ,. ,... ,. ,. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 .9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 2$ 29 30 Time (hours) • Dev_design#1_100years-Atlantic Type 111 24-hr Rainfall=8.30" Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 3 • HydroCAD®6.10 s/n 002234 ©1986-2002 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/22/2004 Subcatchment 2S: Area Flows To Design Point #1 [49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt Runoff = 7.09 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.539 af, Depth= 8.06" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.10-30.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr Rainfall=8.30" Area (ac) CN Description 0.220 98 Building Roof 0.560 98 Paved parking & new driveway 0.022 98 Ledge 0.802 98 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 1.7 200 0.0100 1.9 Sheet Flow, Parking Smooth surfaces n= 0.011 P2= 8.30" 0.1 30 0.0200 6.9 5.46 Circular Channel (pipe), Separator to pond Diam= 12.0" Area= 0.8 sf Perim= 3.1' r— 0.25' n= 0.012 1.8 230 Total • Subcatchment 2S: Area Flows To Design Point#1 Hydrograph 7.09 cfs 12.03 hrs I 7 6 - u 4 3 2. 0 .. .. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 18 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Time (hours) • Dev_design#1 100years-Atlantic Type 11124-hr Rainfall=8.30" Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 4 • HydroCADO 6.10 s/n 002234 m 1986-2002 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/22/2004 Pond 1P: Infiltration pond (92] Warning: Device#2 is above defined storage Inflow Area= 0.802 ac, Inflow Depth = 8.06" Inflow = 7.09 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.539 of Outflow = 1.23 cfs @ 12.46 hrs, Volume= 0.509 af, Atten= 83%, Lag= 25.6 min Discarded = 0.09 cfs @ 12.46 hrs, Volume= 0.122 of Primary = 1.14 cfs @ 12.46 hrs, Volume= 0.388 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.10-30.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 77.65' Surf.Area= 0.087 ac Storage= 0.226 of Plug-Flow detention time= 160.0 min calculated for 0.509 of(95% of inflow) Storage and wetted areas determined by Prismatic sections Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (acres) (acre-feet) (acre-feet) 74.00 0.037 0.000 0.000 76.00 0.062 0.099 0.099 78.00 0.092 0.154 0.253 Discarded OutFlow Max--0.09 cfs @ 12.46 hrs HW=77.65' (Free Discharge) • t3=Exfiltration (Controls 0.09 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=1.14 cfs @ 12.46 hrs HW=77.65' (Free Discharge) �1=Culvert (Controls 1.14 cfs) 2=13road-Crested Rectangular Weir (Controls 0.00 cfs) # Routing Invert Outlet Devices 1 Primary 75.00' 6.0" x 30.0' long Culvert CMP, projecting, no headwall, Ke= 0.900 Outlet Invert= 74.50' S= 0.0167 'P n= 0.015 Cc= 0.900 2 Primary 78.00' 15.0' long x 2.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 Coef. (English) 2.54 2.61 2.61 2.60 2.66 2.70 2.77 2.89 2.88 2.85 3.07 3.20 3.32 3 Discarded 0.00' 0.001400 fpm Exfiltration over entire Surface area • Dev_design#1_100years-Atlantic Type 111 24-hr Rainfall=8.30" Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 5 • HydroCAD®6.10 s/n 002234 O 1986-2002 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/2212004 Pond 1P: Infiltration pond Hydrograph M Inflow ~ 7.09 cis -12.03 hrs '_ ._ - ®Outflow - O Discarded - 13 Primary 7 6- 4 g : 3 1.23 cts(rD 12.46 his .. 2-. 1.14 cfs 12.46 hrs . 1- 0.09 0 _. . .,: . ,: .: . _: .. ........:._ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 • Time (hours) • Dev_design#1_100years-Atlantic Type 111 24-hr Rainfall=8.30" Prepared by SP Engineering, Inc. Page 6 • HydroCAD®6.10 s/n 002234 O 1986-2002 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/22/2004 Link D #1: Design Point #1 Inflow Area = 0.887 ac, Inflow Depth = 5.71" Inflow = 1.51 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.422 of Primary = 1.51 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.422 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary outflow= Inflow,Time Span= 0.10-30.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Link D #1: Design Point #1 Hydrograph e Inflow ` ! 1.51 ofs � 12.12 hrs 0 Primary 1.51 cts 12.12 hrs 01i 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1i 12 13 14 16 % 17 13 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 26 29 30 Time (hours) • w TEL NaSep 20,93 13 46 No .001 P .03. . . : w i �7 C_4 s vaxbn Commis oll Sulo m. MatihaCt111tiPtt5 01970 'd{Ititi A� September 17 , 1993 John R. Serafini , Senior Serafini , Serafini & Darling 63 Federal Street Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Dear Mr. Serafini: As follow up to our telephone discussion today, I wanted to confirm issues that have arisen as a result of a request for Order of conditions extensions for two Fafard projects. Although the Conservation Commission agreed to provide these same properties (64-152 and 64-178) extensions a year ago, a brief review of the files has resulted in a number of questions: • The January 1993 DEP list of 21E sites includes one for Fafard Construction, Route 107 & Swampscott Road, originally added to the list in July 1987 . I am unclear whether the 21E site includes only the property for the 64-178 project or spans all or part of the 64-152 project as well. I would also appreciate knowing the status of the preliminary assessment the state list indicates is underway and what information that study has revealed to date. • The Notices of Intent indicate that the sites are Isolated Land Subject to Flooding, a designation I question. Is there documentation in the City Engineer's files showing the historic hydrologic regime for those areas? Project 64-152 • The file for 64-152 , 'rhe Rich's Distribution Center on Lot 63 , Map 7 , contains an Environmental Notification Form, dated June 1986, it indicates a project of 35-plus acres of which 4500 square feet of wetlands will be filled to allow construction of a driveway and a 10 ,000 square foot wetland replication project. The ENF contains a hand-drawn map, Exhibit A, noting the location of both the filling and the replication. I was unable to find any details about the replication project or any discussion in the NOI . The ENF states that some 600 to 700 cubic yards of contaminated soil will be removed along with 55-gallon drums. The ENF references a groundwater monitoring program being conducted by Kurz Associates, What is the soil contaminated with, what is in the 55-gallon drums, what is the status of the Kurz monitoring program and what results have been i obtained to date? I am concerned that the contaminated soil may be a continuing source of groundwater contamination. The NOI states that approximately 550 square feet of ILSF will be excavated to an elevation to provide a stable slope for parking spaces. It further states that drainage capacity is compensated through use of an existing wetland to the north. What does this mean and how does that approach fit with the replication project referenced in the ENF? • Finally, the special conditions may need some beefing up. SC 5 requires the installation of gas traps in catch basins but no provision exists for maintenance. SC 6 requires Commission approval of an EIR from EDEA. Has an EIR been prepared and has it been forwarded for the Commission's approval? Project 64-178 • The file for project 64-178 , located at 58 Swampscott Road, contains a December 1, 1989 letter, from DEQE (DEp) indicating that the company can either continue to monitor the site or submit, a waiver application. This is a clear reference to the 21E status. Although the NO1 was presented to the Commission in April of that year, I could not find any further discussion of . how the applicant would be dealing with the potential contamination on site as it would impact the resource area . This troubles me. • As is the Case for 64-152 , SC 5 does not address maintenance for the catch basins. I recognize that a crisp response to each of these issues may not be obtainable by the Commission's next meeting, on September 23 . I am prepared, however, to recommend to the members that evening that we vote to extend both Orders for one month to allow sufficient time for the applicant to respond. please contact Debbie Hurlburt by noon on Thursday, the 23rd, to indicate whether a representative of the applicant will appear at the meeting that night to address these matters or whether you wish us to proceed with the one month extension approach. In the latter case, we should add an agenda item for our meeting on October 28 to hear a response to these matters and to address the request for extensions. Thank you for your thoughtful consideration of these issues . Sincerely, Betsy Horne Chair 3 CJ2 q m rQ eii A V 14 Ld���W-F�r'^'>,� X1:"7}1`���' >tl�.r � •H�1' i4�}'Yt.r+r)��I,�^y�r t F r I r - t «'J C : rr , rt F':r L� i{ r' .• tarlf'r�"i1ir� 1 f'! f . s r �FL :. r,rtykKT>z-�•yy.F�f pY/ ; + �+� .Rj 2' {�'• ! ° ,�{� G )F ''r� f��t�i'Yr�� `*r+Y9D' E`r`+r '"_� 1 1 wy r �'h" :�' " +Xr/'�^C1'r�' •ry. .r 1.y{JcY -%•, hi _ �, v ryxry y2,� �rr yr. ,cn+ 1af 7F�r>Y'��.y�i�i'''''{C.fr�' i .f f �C � f In �-f?✓'.�{ �`>e� 1 + 1 ?„r'r tl ;.N yew &.srr,•^i 37,F°r i ,• rC �}�,''�'''� f wnTifxl a3� w !�9G r y iJtfy�� r ,y '{T Y Y•f ��f;r I � � s�,�/ '� r.�l r' �i�,��'/3�7!`�Yn Yr l�`.y N. y ,,tic39•:TaY'..ryJsi.GfY�B �il"jAry �F�wi rn//r. •, " 'J�WNi)r��7rf r �� Y. ,i'� ' �"1"/� '�[x�f '�`�'} .rr� T3 At�a'�1r1'4l.�Yrfy°`+���lyK.�'�ir •.yr „r� ..rr.+tif T �l�'p:�y'tYA"`i �y"� �r�.'? 'fit tii• �`��a M1�r yf. t...�Jf�sr ,s�i ��„f�f�,[�jr' ��4irf 3 s .. 'J' i�• � r �F r 1f�''( e. f _ r rJ� 4x ,+r rl p J�.} �'y•{T .N ..,�JrJy..re %L •'' .f'f'' r 1• r - • ¢ ," f �� • ir•. �)e� i�F`{f} - ��•)•r W `'�` ,{ r.�YYs`�.'j�e,'3r�t' r„:.Yr ^,,_.r - ,, yy� i gi n e - ��j n„~t".a�' r f rN_ �+,��,� 3rd" r✓�. }�.e.? �yv 1 !^r���-Xi r,�e,`•' �b_ !j e'�Xi� t��h'~'xt y r d`4;. ' " .� .� jrr��•• .. - t "`'�'vf �JF riY ! -s' ��Y�"•ri'Y,i7 ��� �Iry'� tri { '��� ��r wr Eire' f ' 3r irk��j�l�*�r�rf!"' � �'• �e`"� Y,eY7 "�r'` r'a�T'�� . ' ✓ r�y'.S�.r'tV ••r �1:Y.Y -..r� v��.�• 7 r. JP +y 7r� r :i: �{ � 2 by!•�1 t f}nr',y� ••` pf > I,fly Jt } ,f �f�y�'di.•�fi r t •f �`?'� 'rl`�• {'J�•�yf�fjl�r a `7�4 Y• i `,• ?Fy3 P 1� y 3 �` 7y" �1 •~ . {'fvVM • ,� '1��I1 r"'tP LY"�t 11�� j� r ��`��fl FS=�rJ< 1,- , � ,N: + -'' � �. N' ' t� r ,y'�rJ� r�' 7(33'l�rl.rr�. � � t• . 'fit 1 1 r " y r +' F ",y }.J-'r"��, •: urf� �f / r T { {rl tt +i ,� t N' , r ,•�• ) }Y11nf/r-�' f tttxr��r.F.f�6�a` r •t' � �>t., ,y 1 i, X •�r. '.l��.qr. . [ Fr!� ,q li+ � r�}xji}7o +7}f�•�. �r wtf4'r,�yi� ,y. x: '��� <. . "�•.� '�.}. x �� i� y F� +�rr� •x1��''."r�Y�,� fr'+9A'"� �" N !. � � � `Y } 5�.; '��� ,'t'�'{,w r lv-�'3``7 r h.•{, � rYft r '% x f �.^.l { l� I �{`x IC$v•II s4 rry 'r. • r� N s4 i,r`rr'� �✓r '9L'�; ��'4/'� fir'} �� + r 4 '=, .i, r. ir' � F: ��• r �tt{�i�t,7n ry�"r 1, :F � >) r ➢x� Lam` +�,,�,jFJ�!j � ` y�a 1 r}�/ii;I� Yyf i•"�,Yrs°� at f 3 1 Y fy d. ��•V� f ff �r`J .3'.Y�� ` r 'i Tom. T�.r r ��T #h�� '.. l{rYY ���f�t.�r: rY aYCfr�F Yir . Y! r?�F m• e �y x'f� � �I f� 'r r f r'�T y � r' `� r �1.i,�`{lrf, rf'<�`3'�'j�''S(�,,�#� ' • ,�,�i� Y a � i I 'v rY Jy ��7'3/.3, �yyr�rx<r FLy'S ,r{tt},('}�dr,N�t. xl#� ? r�lyFr�E.�yiE� .}i yy� F yv�•, ��, MfFyr" i�Sl�•3Y�dY rY•Y•�}1y��a'f .Fn'��`!>�{�t'7' 3f ��� 9tr r{,tA r! r�� � !r'� y{�rt 5�,; l;jISOM YY ',��JjI{ 1'r.E;`j�� .,�. t? 7 Sal r,1' > _ :4:J�.; r d, .s�• i;r):,?if r 1`Y,� 7r¢ t .. Y 'J -' =Fy.. ✓ �� t�{ � f .<7 x 4N .. {'.+,{� tfd « /�!. > Pt'r F5 � t yrj•' rr',r " +7A..>f}'iy(Y5>• r -IY„'! "irI Y� pf.5 y�}t rr^^ r`��ibr , �'}r` 't1 ✓ Ty rt"t� r..� " ' i`��TF rNr y.y:�'Ft J ! '�':'e Ih K�t1d 'F i¢+�.�Y2� a�tY,1„vsyie�a)oDt s, .,'.{"id.'+ � �F�' � :tl}-�. ' ,•r+fi�r._ .. .. .;.i!: . .a �� < r , r�_� �1,.✓ 1 ' ENVIRONMENTAL NOTIFICATION FORM RICHS DISTRIBUTION CENTER SWAMPSCOTT ROAD ' SALEM,MA. 1 11.28: Environmental Notification Form ENVIRONMENTAL NOTIFICATION FORM I. SUMMARY A. Project Identifi tjon 1. Project Name 1ch s Distribution Center AddreWl-ocation Swampscott Road a em, MA Project Pr The Fafard Companies 2. Project Proponent Address 290 Eliot January 1990 3. Est. Commencement y 1 88 Est. Completion 7,000,000 15 000 , Status of Project Design A Complete. Approx. Cost $ ' 4. Amount(if any)of bordering vegetated wetlands,salt marsh,or tidelands to be dredged, filled, moved, or altered (other than by receipt of runoff)as a result of the project. .f8 acres 4,500 square feet. 5. This project is cate%gtdcaily�included and therefore requires preparation of an EIR. Yes No B. Narrative Project Description Describe project and site. Proposed project is approximately 35+ acre site to be developed for a 300,500+ SF distribution center and related offices. The project involves the filling of approximately 4500+ SF of wetlands for driveway access around building with 10,000+ SF of wetland replication. The existing site contains approximately 4 acres of vegetated wetlands. Approximately half of the site has been cleared and some excavation has taken place. The remainder of the site is residential land to the west and undeveloped land to the south with a 170,000 SF manufacturing plant, Maynard Plastics to the east with frontage on Swampscott Road to the north. ' See Exhibit "A" for sketch of proposed project. ' Copies of the complete EVF may be obtained from(proponen�?Vf maid Companies Name: Don Seaberg — Firm/Agency: 617) 881-1600 Address: 290 Eliot Street- AShlanrl h1A Phone No. 01721 ., 1986 THIS IS AN IMPORTANT COMMENT PERIOD IOD IS LIMITED. For Information, 11.28: continued P.2 C. List the State or Federal agencies from which permits or other actions have been/will be sought: Agency Name Permit Date filed; file no. Commonwealth of Mass Sewer Connection Permit DEQE — Division of 1 Water Pollution Control D. List any government agencies or programs from which the proponent will seek financial assistance ' for this project: Agency Name Funding Amount None E. Areas of potential impact (complete Sections 11 and III first, before completing this section). 1. Check all areas in which,in the proponent's judgment,an impact of this project may occur.Positive impacts, as well as adverse impacts, may be indicated. Construction Long Term Impacts Impacts X Z Inland Wetlands. .... . . .. .. . Coastal Wetlands/Beaches. . ... . .. ..... . ......... . Tidelands.............. ........ ............. ....... x x Traffic........................ .. .................... Open Space/Recreation. ... ....................... Historical/Archaeological. .. .. . .. .. .... .. ... ...... Fisheries/Wildlife.................................. x Vegetation/Trees.......... ........................ Agricultural Lands............... ....... ........... Water Pollution......... ...... .. ......... .......... x ' Water Supply/Use............ .................. ... x x Solid Waste........................................ Hazardous,Materials.................. ............ x Air Pollution.............................. ......... x Noise............................................... x Wind/Shadow...................................... Aesthetics........................ .................. Growth Impacts................................... Community/Housing and the Built Environment............................... Other (Specify) ' 2. List the alternatives which have been considered. No Build P.3 F. Has this project been filed with EOEA before?No x Yes EDEA No. G. WETLANDS AND WATERWAYS - - - - f 1. Will an Order of Conditions under the Wetlands Protection Act (c.131s.40) or a License under the Waierways Act (c.91) be required? Yes x No 2. Has a local Order of Conditi Nos been: 64-152 a. issued? Dale of issuance ; DEQE File No. b. appealed? Yes ; No . 3. Will a variance from the Wetlands or Waterways Regulations be required? Yes No ll. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. Map; site plan. Include an original 8!; x 11 inch or larger section of the most recent U.S.G.S. 7.5 minute series scale topographic map with the project area location and boundaries clearly shown. If available, attach a site plan of the proposed project. B. State total area of project: .35 acres. Estimate the number of acres (r- the nearest 1/10 acre) directly affected that are currently: 1. Developed ... ........... _7 .2 acres 6. Tidelands .. N/Aacres ' 2. Open Space/ 9 7. Productive Resources Woodlands/Recreation acres Agriculture .. N/A acres 3. Wetlands .. . ... .. ... .. .. 4 acres Forestry acres 4. Floodplain .... ..... ..... _acres 8. Other ............ .:..... _acres ' S. Coastal Area ............ N/A acres C. Provide the following dimensions, if applicable: Existing increase Total Length in miles ......................................... Number of Housing Units ........' Number of Stories .. �— 2 Gross Floor Area in square feet ....................... 170,000 -366,= 77MT00- Number of parking spaces ............................. 782 330 �- Total of Daily vehicle trips to and from site (Total Trip Ends) 675 1,464 2,139 Estimated Average Daily Traffic on road(s) . ' serving site ........ 1. Swampscott Road.............. —T7_74,c- 4 2. 3 D. TRAFFIC PLAN. If the proposed project v t require any permit for access to local roads or state highways,attach a sketch showing thi kation and layout of the proposed driveway(s). See Exhibit A, also Traffic report entitled "City of Salem Traffic Study", Fay, Spofford & Thorndike, dated April 6, 1987. 11.28: continued PA 111. ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Instructions: Explain direct and indirect adverse impacts, including those arising from general construction and operations. For every answer explain why significant adverse impact is considered likely or unlikely to result. Positive impact may also be listed and explained. Also, state the source of information or other basis for the answers supplied. Such environmental information should be acquired at least in part by field inspection. A. Open Space and Recreation 1. Might the project affect the condition, use, or access to any open space and/or recreation ' area? Explanation and Source: No. The project is zoned business park development. Appropriate landscaping and buffers will be provided. ' 2. Is the project site within 500 feet of any public open space, recreation,or conservation land? Explanation and Source: yes. The project abuts conservation land on the southerly side and City of Salem land of the westerly side. Source: Salem Assessor's Maps ' B. Historic and Archaeological Resources 1. Might any site or structure of historic significance be affected by the project? (Prior consultation with Massachusetts Historical Commission is advised.) Explanation and Source: No. Source: Massachusetts Historical Commission Files 2. dight any archaeological site be affected by the project? (Prior consultation with Massachusetts Historical Commission is advised.) Explanation and Source: No. Source: Massachusetts Historical Commission Files C. Ecological Effects ' 1. Might the project significantly affect fisheries or wildlife, especially any rare or endangered species? (Prior consultation with the Massachusetts Natural Heritage Program is advised). ' Explanation and Source: No. The site is a mixed open and wooded area with wetlands along Swampscott Road and elsewhere on the property. This development is not expected to affect fisheries or wildlife significantly. The Mass National Heritage Program files showed no rare or endangered ' elements as of 6/16/86. An updated review by MNHP files has been requested by the proponent. ' 11.28: continued P.5 ' 2. Might the project significantly affect vegetation, especially any rare or endangered species of plant? (Prior consultation with the Massachusetts Natural Heritage Program is advised.) (Estimate approximate number of mature trees to be removed: 200 _ ---) Explanation and Source: A large number of trees will be removed as part of the site development ' (building construction and pavement) . However, no rare or endangered elements were listed in the MNHP data base as of 6/16/86. The proponent has requested MNHP to review its updated files. ' 3.Agricultural Land.Has any portion of the site been in agricultural use within the last 15 years? ' If yes, specify use and acreage. Explanation and Source: No 1 ' D. Water Quality and Quantity 1. Might the project result in significant changes in drainage patterns? Explanation and Source: No. Any changes in drainage patterns will be mitigated by a storm drain to detention basin system. 2.Might the project result in the introduction of any pollutants,including sediments,into marine waters, surface fresh waters or ground water? Explanation and Source: No. Catch basin with sumps and oil and gas separators will be provided to intercept any pollutants before they are discharged into existing water ways. Sumps with detention basins will provide a further screening and settling of sediments. ' 3. Does the project involve any dredging? No x Yes Volume . If 10,000 cy or more, attach completed Standard Application Form for Water Quality Certification, Part 1 (314 CMR 9.02(3), 9.90, DEQE Division of Water Pollution Control). ' 11.28: continued i ' PA ' 4. Will any part of the project be located in flowed or filled tidelands, Great Ponds, or other waterways?(Prior consultation with the DEQE and CZM is advised.) Explanation and Source: No 5. Will the project generate or convey sanitary sewage? No Yes x If Yes, Quantity: 5985 gallons per day Disposal by: (a) Onsite septic systems .......................... Yes No x (b) Public sewerage systems Cocation; average and peak daily flows to ' treatment works) ....•....... . .... ........ ...... ... Yes No Explanation and Source: The project 8 inc gravity sewer will connect to a gravity sewer on ' Swampscott Road and connect to a pump station which will pump sewage back up Swampscott via 3110 linear feet of 12" ductile sewage force main to a 15" gravity sewer in First Street where it eventually enters the South Essex Treatment Plant. Avg. daily flow - 27 MGD - Design ' flow 4l1`MGD 6. Might the project result in an increase in paved or impervious surface over a sole source aquifer or an aquifer recognized as an important present or future source of water supply? ' Explanation and Source: Yes. The project involves creation of impervious surface over an aquifer. All runoff from the project will be routed through a drainage system as described in D.2. above and then discharge ' back to the same drainage and aquifer recharge area. Source: Town of Marblehead DPW 7. Is the project in the watershed of any surface water body used as a drinking water supply? Explanation and Source: ' No ' 8. Are there any public or private drinking water wells within a 1/2-mile radius of the proposed project? Explanation and Source: Yes Source: ` Town of Salem Engineering Department 1 ' 11.28: continued .� P.7 ' 9. Does the operation of the project result in any increased consumption of water? Approximate consumption 6500 gallons per day.Likely water source(s) City of Salem Explanation and Source: w E. Solid Waste and Hazardous Materials 1. Estimate types and approximate amounts of waste materials generated, e.g., industrial, domestic, hospital, sewage sludge, construction debris from demolished structures. How/ ' where will such waste be disposed of? Explanation and Source: 3015 pounds + of solid waste per day will be generated of domestic ' waste related to normal office operation (paper, boxes, cartons, containers) . Might the project involve the generation, use, transportation, storage, release, or disposal ' of potentially hazardous materials? Explanation and Source: No. The project is a distribution facility and related offices. 3. Has the site previously been used for the use, generation, transportation, storage, release, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials? Explanation and Source: Yes. A certain amount of low level hazardous materials were found to have been dumped on site. Approximately 600- 700 cubic yards of soil were removed from the site along with 55-gallon drums and 5-gallon containers to an authorized disposal area. Follow-up action is currently being taken by Kurz Associates with a ground water monitoring program. ' F. Energy Use and Air Quality 1. Will space heating be provided for the project? If so, describe the type, energy source, and approximate energy consumption. Explanation and Source: ' Natural gas, forced hot air, 11.28: continued P.8 2. Will the project require process heat or steam? If so,describe the proposed system, the fuel type, and approximate fuel usage. Explanation and Source: . No ' 3. Does the project include industrial processes that will release air contaminants to the atmosphere? If so, describe the process (type, material released,and quantity released). ' Explanation and Source: No, The proposed project is a distribution center and related offices. No manufacturing will occur. 4.Are there any other sources of air contamination associated with the project(e.g.automobile traffic, aircraft traffic, volatile organic compound storage, construction dust)? Explanation and Source: Yes. Small amounts of air pollutants may be generated by earth moving and construction equipment. These emissions will be temporary and eliminated upon the project's completion. ' 5. Are there any sensitive receptors (e.g. hospitals, schools, residential areas) which would be affected by air contamination caused by the project? Explanation and Source: Yes. The project is abutting undeveloped ' residentially zoned land on the westerly side of the site. ' G. Noise 1. Might the project result in the generation of noise? (Include any source of noise during construction or operation, e.g., engine exhaust, pile ' driving, traffic.) Explanation and Source: Yes. The project will result in higher levels of noise during construction phases and site preparation. This will ' be eliminated upon completion of the project. Although there will be a certain amount of noise generated by truck traffic during operation of the distribution center. r 11.28: continued P.9 2.Are there any sensitive receptors(e.g.,hospitals,schools, residential areas)which would be affected by any noise caused by the project? Explanation and Source: Yes. The proposed site abuts residentially zoned land on the westerly side of the site. A 75' landscaped buffer will be maintained between the project and residential area. ' 3. Is the project a sensitive receptor,sited in an area of significant ambient noise? Explanation and Source: No. H. Wind and Shadow ' 1. Might the project cause wind and shadow impacts on adjacent properties? Explanation and Source: No. The projected maintains sufficient buffers to mitigate impacts on adjacent properties. ' Source: Field inspection it 1. Aesthetics 1. Are there any proposed structures which might be considered incompatible with existing adjacent structures in the vicinity in terms of size, physical proportion and scale, or significant differences in land use? Explanation and Source: No. The project is located on land zoned business park development and appropriate buffers will be provided. r ' 2.Might the project impair visual access to waterfront or other scenic areas? Explanation and Source: No. ' Source: Field inspection 1 , P.10 a ' IV. CONSISTENCY WITH PRESENT PLANNING Discuss consistency with current federal, state and local land use, transportation, open space, recreation and environmental plans and policies. Consult with local or regional planning authorities where appropriate. The project is consistent with local planning. It provides the City of Salem with an increased tax base-as well as employment opportunities — offered by the expansion of the existing business, which is located in the City of Salem. V. FINDINGS AND CERTIFICATION 1 A. The public notice of environmental review has been/will be published in the following newspaper(s): (NAME) Salem Evening News (Date) April 6, 1988 B. This form has been circulated to all agencies and persons as required by 301 CMR 11.24. 3/31/88 ' Date `J gnature of Resp- Bible Officer Date Signature of person preparing or Project Proponent ENF(if different from above) James E. McLoughlin Donald Seaberg Name(print or type) Name (print or type) Address290 Eliot Street Address 290 Eliot Street Ashland, MA 01721 AsIlTand, MA 0±72i Telephone Number Telephone Number 881-1600 ' 11.29: FORMS OF NOTICE (1j PUBLIC NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROJECT: FORMS OF NOTICE (1) PUBLIC NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROJECT: 300,000 SF Distribution Center . (Brief description of pmiect) LOCATION: Swampscott Road, Salem, MA PROPONENT: The Fafard Companies, 290 Eliot Street, Ashland, MA 01721 The undersigned is submitting an Environmental Notification Form ("ENF') to the Secretary of Environmental Affairs on or before March 31, 1988 (Dart) This will initiate review of the above project pursuant to the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act ("MEPA", ' G.L. c. 30, secs. 61, 62.62H). Copies of the ENF may be obtained from:' Donald Seaberg, 290 Eliot Street, Ashland, MA 01721 (617) 881-1600 ' (Name,address,phone number of proponent or proponent's agent) Salem Copies of the ENF are also being sent to the Conservation Commission and Planning Board of (Municipality) ' where they may be inspected. The Secretary of Environmental Affairs will publish notice of the ENF in the Environmental Monitor, will receive public comments on the project for twenty days,and will then decide,within ten days,if an Environmental Impact Report is needed. A site visit and consultation session on the project may also be scheduled. All persons wishing to comment on the project, ar to be notified of a site visit or consultation session, should write to the Secretary ' of Environmental Affairs,100 Cambridge Street,Boston,Massachusetts 02202,Attention:MEPA Unit,referencing the above project. By The Fafard Companies ' (proponent) R L�PL ICA (o r i Pr7oPosrD 300, ocots G b/S7215 vTiO� GE>,/TE2. NAvr�ArLn AR,5A r(-4577C, _ /70,000 sF LF-Y WFv1T WETLAUE)5 sr�r�Fl- P��► � � fNo sc..'a.,-F EXHIBIT B ' LOCATION PLAN i 1 i 1 l , mIllig 0, 0 e N . ..... Xe, sou V� Z" bS L '.Jf St ADD 4: � � � o Q 1:7 il r GHL D > PLN B An" �.3 - -----\-, 'Aln n io! M-10 Legg 51, PSC ed co -Rem P�d y tax POnd � 3 VW, Mmn o Park lT !h or Env cliff e"N ?GINE 9 FST R�' DIRECTORS NATHANIEL M.WENTWORTw,JR. T911 MAX 0- OTA GEORGE m REE ASSOCIATES WALLACEM.REEAD FAY SPOFFORD & THORN DIKE INC. NSON PAUL) EBER WALIACW.READ ROBER E SERI ROSERTT.LONEN ROBERT E.BERTOLINO ROBERT T.LONEY DAVID LEE SONGARTONE MICN RODNEY sJ. O RRDE ENGINEERS NEIL x.DAYKtN EMILEJ HAMWE RDE GEORGE L.EAGLE III [MILE J.MAMWEY CTRL N.LUNOGgEN JAMES c.wouRKE 191 SPRING STREET, P.O. BOX HEIL A...cx•r J MES G J.DLOVE q.JR. 8o2 JOHN B.MALLETTE CONSULTANTS LEXINGTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02173 CHARLES D.SHAKER 16171 863-8300 RO BERT..SMITH ROZI M,ICHARD W. EDWARD A.WELCH RICHARD W.ALBRECHT April 16, 1987 1 Mr. Gerard Kavanaugh City Planner ' One Salem Green Salem, Massachusetts Subject : Bubmission Of 1 Final Report - Salem Traffig Study Dear Mr . Kavanaugh: 1 Fay, Spofford & Thorndike, Inc . is pleased to transmit fifteen (15) copies of the City Of Salem Traffic Study final report . Implementation of the improvement program contained in the document will provide the City with a safer and more efficient ' roadway system. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to the City of 1 Salem, and trust that this report meets You have any questions on the attached report, plesedorequirements . If hesitate to contact me or Gary Hebert . P Please do not Very truly yours, FAY, SPOFFORD & THORNDIKE, INC. 1 By Rodney P. Plourde, Ph.D. , P.E. Vice President i 1 1 1 - 1 . * 1' � TABLE OF CONTENTS Title i Page I . INTRODUCTION 1 II . EXISTING CONDITIONS A. Key Study Area Roadways 2 State Route IA 2 State Route 107 2 State Route 114 2 Boston Street 2 Swampscott Road and Marlborough Road 3 ' Jefferson Avenue and Canal Street 3 3 Jackson Street and Willson Street North Salem Neighborhood Short-Cut 3 ' Routes B. Study Area Intersections 3 C. Daily and Peak Hour Volumes 4 D. Vehicle Speeds 4 1 E. Existing Levels of Service 10 1. Capacity Analysis Criteria 15 Unsignalized Intersections 15 15 Signalized Intersections 1 2 . Evaluation 16 F. Safety 16 18 1 III . FUTURE CONDITIONS A. Future Programmed Roadway Improvements 22 22 B. Background Traffic Growth 1 C. Future Salem Development 23 D. Traffic Projections 23 E. Future Levels of Service 24 24 1 IV. RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENT PLAN A. General Objectives 31 B. Description of Recommended Improvement Plan 31 1 1 . General Recommendations 31 31 2 . Intersection and Street Recommendations 33 Essex at Webb Street and Fort Avenue 1 Congress Street at Derby Street and Hawthorne 33 Boulevard 35 Access Between Route 128 and Salem 37 1 Jefferson Avenue and Canal Street Bridge Connection 40 Goodhue Street and Harmony Grove Road 41 Boston/Essex Streets and Highland Avenue/ 1 Jackson Street Intersections 43 Cherry Hill Avenue/Willson Street/Highland Avenue 45 zl Willson Street/Jefferson Avenue 97 1 1 i TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Title Page B. Description of Recommended Improvement Plan (Cont . ) Loring Avenue/Jefferson Avenue/Canal Street 49 Loring Avenue at Legg ' s Hill Road 51 Vinnin Square - Loring Avenue/Paradise Road Loring Avenue/Vinnin Street, and Vinnin Street/ Paradise Road 53 Salem/Swampscott Road Highland Avenue to MBTA Commuter Rail Tracks 55 MBTA Commuter Rail Tracks to Essex Street in Swampscott 56 Highland Avenue/Swampscott Road and Marlborough Road/Traders Way/Highland Avenue 61 ' Canal Street 63 Neighborhood Traffic Intrusion 64 Federal Street 69 + ' Highland Street/Oakland Street 65 C. Estimated Costs and Potential Funding Sources 65 i 1 1 FAY,$ OFFO RO B TXORNOIKE,INC. ENGINEERS LIST OF FIGURES Number and Title 1. Traffic Count Locations 9 2 . 1986 AM Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes 13 ' 3 . 1986 PM Peak Hou_ Turning Movement Volumes 19 4 . 1991 AM Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes 29 5 . 1991 PM Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes 30 6 . Recommended Improvements - Essex Street at Webb Street and Fort Avenue 34 7. Recommended Improvements - Congress Street at Derby Street and Hawthorne Boulevard 36 ' 8 . Recommended Improvements - Route 114 in Salem and Peabody 38 9 . Recommended Improvements - Goodhue Street and ' Harmony Grove Road 42 10 . Recommended Improvements - Boston/Essex Streets and Highland Avenue/Jackson Street Intersections 44 ' 11 . Recommended Improvements - Cherry Hill Avenue/ Willson Street/Highland Avenue 46 12 . Recommended Improvements - Willson Street/ Jefferson Avenue 48 13 . Recommended Improvements - Loring Avenue/ Jefferson Avenue/Canal Street 50 14 . Recommended Improvements - Loring Avenue at Legg ' s Hill Road 52 15 . Recommended Improvements - Vinnin Square including Loring Avenue/Paradise Road, Loring Avenue/Vinnin Street , and Vinnin Street/Paradise Road 54 16 . Recommended Improvements - Highland Avenue/ Swampscott Road and Marlborough Road/Traders Way/ Highland Avenue 62 ' Recommender' Improvements - Relocated Swampscott Road 69 1 1 j' LIST OF TABLFS ' Number and Title 1 . Intersection Geometric Data 5 ' 2 . City of Salem - 1986 Average Weekday Traffic 11 3 . Level of Service Criteria for Unsignalized and Signalized Intersections 17 4 . 1986 City of Salem Unsignalized Intersections ' Reserve Capacities and Levels of Service 19 5 . 1986 City of Salem Level of Service Summary For Signalized Intersections 20 ' 6 . Accident Ranking of Salem Intersections 21 7 . City of Salem - 1991 Average Weekday Traffic 25 8 . 1991 City of Salem Unsignalized Intersections ' Reserve Capacities and Levels of Service 27 9 . 1991 City of Salem Level of Service Summary For Signalized Intersections 28 10 . 1991 City of Salem Level of Service Summary ' For Signalized Intersections (With Recommended Improvements) 66 ' APPENDIX t 1 I. INTRODUCTION ' The City of Salem retained Fay, Spofford & Thorndike, Inc. to study and recommend improvement options and priorities for a significant portion of its major roadway system. ' Since Salem is highly dependent upon roadways which are under the jurisdiction of other adjacent communities, this study approaches traffic improvements from a regional as well ' as a localized perspective. In addition to being very concerned abort the traffic impacts Of future development in the area of Highland Avenue, Swampscott Road, and Vinnin Square, the City would like to improve traffic flow along the roadway system connecting Salem with the Cities of Peabody, Beverly, and Lynn as well as the ' Towns Of Swampscott and Marblehead. This study also focused in on improvements to circulation and parking in downtown Salem, and assessed methods of reducing the intrusion of through ' traffic into Salem' s neighborhoods . This traffic report documents existing and future traffic conditions I further onlingthis dreport . Following ways and lthe ons trafficepictedanon alysis1e sections , various roadway improvement options and neighborhood traffic control measures are described and screened. Also presented are conceptual-level transportation improvements within the City of Salem. The proposed improvements within the City of Salem are intended to reflect regional as well as local traffic concerns . The report provides the City with a solid ' technical basis for assigning priorities on roadway improvement projects . Included in the report are sections on Existing Conditions , Future Conditions Without Improvements , and a ' Recommended Improvement Plan. Before s completed,npitmwilltbenof e necessary to design therconceptualan i ' improvements and obtain the necessary state and local approvals for funding and construction. Two implementation time frames have been assumed: o Short Range - up to five years; and o Long Range - five to ten years . Proposed improvements that are relatively low cost (i .e. , could be funded by the City or the private sector) and can be ' constructed within five years are considered to be Short Range improvements . Short Range improvements would involve only m:.nor right-of-way takings, not involving buildings . Those improvements which are highly controversial , involve complicated designs, environmental permitting, and significant right-of-way takings are considered to be long range improvements . -1- II . EXISTING CONDITIONS There are no limited access highways providing regional circulation within the City of Salem. Salem, and the adjacent Town of Marblehead to the east, are dependent upon a few ' heavily-travelled arterials which feed into both communities from the three limited access highways serving North Shore communities I-95, Route 1, and Route 126 . The absence of limited access highways, the need to retain the historic character of North Shore communities, and high residential densities, results in significant regional exchanges of traffic between Salem, Peabody, Beverly, Danvers, Lynn, Marblehead, and ' Swampscott . Supplemented by numerous collectors and local streets , four major arterials of regional significance, State Routes 1A, 107, 114 and Boston Street, connect Salem with surrounding communities . ' A. Key Study Area Roadways Most of the highest volume arterial roadways in the City of ' Salem have two travel lanes -- one in each direction. For the most part, the major arterials are numbered state routes . Following is a brief description of the four numbered state routes through Salem. State Route lA ' Route lA passes through Salem generally in a north-south direction between the City of Beverly and the Town of Swampscott . From north to south, Route lA is designated as Bridge Street, Winter Street, Washington Square North, ' Hawthorne Boulevard, Derby Street , Lafayette Street , Loring Avenue, and Paradise Road into the Town of Swampscott . ✓ State Route 107 Route 107 passes through Salem in a north-south direction between the City of Beverly and the City of Lynn. Its designated route from north to south includes Bridge Street , segments of Boston and Essex Streets, as well as Highland Avenue up to the Lynn/Salem line. Highland Avenue between ' l Salem Hospital and the Lynn/Salem line is the only existing \ four-lane arterial in the City. ' State Route 114 Route 114 is the major east-west arterial serving the Cities of Salem and Peabody, as well as the Town of ' Marblehead . From Margin Street at the Salem/Peabody line, going from west to east , Route 114 meanders through Salem via -2- j' North, Summer, Norman, Washington, and Lafayette Streets . In ' addition to serving east-west traffic demands, Route 114 is the most heavily-travelled access between Route 128 and Salem. Boston Street Boston Street provides part of an important east-west connection between Route 128 and Salem. In a westerly direction (via the Route 128/Lowell Street interchange) , Main Street in the City of Peabody feeds directly into Boston Street at the Peabody/Salem line. The segment of Boston Street ' between Bridge and Essex Streets also carries Route 107 traffic, as mentioned above. ✓ Swampscott Road and Marlborough Road ' In addition to serving as access routes to Highland Avenue and Swampscott Road area developments , Swampscott Road and Marlborough Road corridor provides an alternative to Route 114 for traffic destined between Peabody, Swampscott, or Marble- head. Swampscott Road and Marlborough Road are offset at Highland Avenue by about 750 feet . tJefferson Avenue and Canal Street 1 These parallel minor arterials connect downtown Salem with the Town of Swampscott via Loring Avenue (SR1A) . Between the. northerly and southerly termini of Jefferson Avenue and Canal Street -- a distance of about 1 .25 miles, there are no cross ' streets due to the MBTA/B&M track system. This deficiency tends to focus traffic at the Jefferson Avenue/Canal Street intersection and at Riley Plaza . Jackson Street and Willson Street These are important , heavily-travelled east-west collectors . Jackson Street connects Essex Street/Highland Avenue with Jefferson Avenue; Willson Street connects Highland Avenue with Jefferson Avenue and provides access to Salem High ' School . North Salem Short-cut Routes ' Streets in several North Salem residential neighborhoods (which are adjacent to several residential neighborhoods in the City of Peabody) -- i .e. , Mason Street, Highland Street , Tremont Street, Oakland Street, and Flint Street -- provide bypass alternatives to motorists who would otherwise be using Route 114 and the Boston Street/Main Street/Lowell Street corri- dor . The resultant through traffic is clearly undesirable to the safety and quality of life experienced in the neighborhoods . -3- r' Based on observations, through-traffic motorists use these bypass routes to avoid congestion on Route 114 and the Boston Street/Main Street/Lowell Street corridor. B. Study Area Intersections ' The geometric features of Salem intersections which were analyzed during the course of this study are summarized in Table 1 . Included is information on the overall street width ' on each leg of an intersection, the approach width of each leg (i .e. , the width of the roadway dedicated to vehicles entering the intersection) , number of approach lanes , and whether ' parking is permitted on the approach to the intersection. Generally, for streets within an urban context, Salem streets are carrying enormous volumes of traffic, a great deal ' of which is through traffic. Of the streets listed in Table 2, 52 percent are carrying over 15, 000 vehicles per day. For design purposes , acce table peak hour levels of congestion are i� usually only possible when four anes o rave are streets which have volumes exceeding 15, 000 vehicles per day. Since there are only two lanes of travel on most of Salem' s roadways , numerous deficiencies in safety and congestion were 7' expected. Manual turning movement counts were obtained at the ' following locations : - Essex Street at Fort Avenue and Webb Street ' - Essex Street at Washington Street Essex Street at Boston Street Essex Street at North Street - Highland Avenue at Dalton Parkway ' _ Highland Avenue at Jackson Street Highland Avenue at Willson Street ✓- Highland Avenue at Marlborough Road Highland Avenue at Swampscott Road Washington Street at Federal Street - Washington Street at Lynde Street - North Street at Federal Street ' - North Street at Lynde Street North Street at Mason Street - Summer Street at Norman Street ' _ Derby Street at Hawthorne Boulevard Derby Street at Lafayette Street - Loring Avenue at Canal Street ' _ Loring Avenue at Jefferson Avenue Loring Avenue at Paradise Road - Loring Avenue at Vinnin Street - Willson Street at Jefferson Avenue - Highland Street at Oakland Street -4- t 1 i TABLE 1 INTERSECTION GEOMETRIC DATA Intersection Geometrics Street Approach No. of Approach Approach Intersection Width Width Lanes Parking Essex/Fort Essex St. - NB 50 32 2 No Essex St . Ext . - SB 50 25 1 Yes Webb St . - EB 30 12 1 No ' Fort St . - WB 40 20 1 Yes Essex/Washington ' Washington St . - NB 48 21 2 Yes Washington St . - SB 46 23 1 Yes Essex St . (1-way WB) 28 - - No ' Essex/Boston Essex St . - NB 88 44 2 Yes ' Essex St . - SB 4B 24 1 Yes Boston St . - EB 53 16 1 Yes ' Essex/North Summer St . - NB 42 20 1 Yes ' North St . - SB 46 23 2 Yes Essex St . - EB 43 20 2 Yes Essex St . - WB 32 22 2 Yes ' Highland/Dalton Pkwy. Highland Ave. - NB 46 22 2 No Highland Ave. - SB 52 30 2 Yes Dalton Pkwy. - WB 60 24 1 Yes ' Highland/Jackson Highland Ave. - NB 46 22 2 No Highland Ave . - SB 52 30 2 Yes ' Jackson St. - WB 41 20 2 No Hiahland/Willson ' Highland Ave . - NB 48 24 2 No Highland Ave. - SB 48 24 2 No Cherry Hill - EB 24 24 2 Yes ' Willson St . - WB 40 20 2 No -5- ! , TABLE 1 (Continued) INTERSECTION GEOMETRIC DATA Intersection Street Geometrics Intersection Width Approach No. of Approach Approach —th Width Lanes Part_ Highland/Marlborough Highland Ave. - NB 63 34 Highland Ave. - SB 673 No Marlborough Rd. - EB 33 43 4 No Traders Way _ WB 21 2 No Highland/Swampscott 64 34 3 No ' Highland Ave. - NB 63 24 Highland Ave. - SB 632 No Swampscott Rd . - WB 34 35 3 No 22 2 No Washington/Federal Washington St . - NB 60 30 Washington St . - SB 85 1-2 Yes Federal St - (I-way WB) 46 39 1-2 Yes Federal St . - WB 24 24' -1 Yes Yes Washington/Lunde Washington St . - NB 48 24 Washington St . - SB 501 Yes Lynde St . 25 124 Yes Church St . (1-way EB) 15 29 2 Yes North/Federal No North St . - NB 46 23 ' North St . - SB70 2 Yes Federal St . (1-way WB) 23 33 2 No Federal St . - WB' 26 26 - North/Lunde 2 Yes ' North St . - NB 45 22 North St . - SB 4221 1 Yes Lynde St . (l-way EB) 26 1 Yes v - No ' North/Mason North St . - NB 50 25 orth St . - SB 47 1-2 Yes Mason St . - EB 23 1 Yes 28 14 1 No -6- A, TABLE 1 (Continued) INTERSECTION GEOMETRIC DATA ' Intersection Geometrics Street Approach No. of Approach Approach Intersection Width Width Lanes Parking ' Summer/Norman Summer St. - NB 36 12 1 No Summer St . - SB 40 20 1 Yes Norman St . - EB 47 23 2 No Chestnut St. - WB 33 33 . 2 Yes Derby/Hawthorne ' Congress St . - NB 40 21 1 Yes Hawthorne St . - SB 44 22 2 No Derby St . - EB 70 27 2 No ' Derby St . - WB 60 30 2 Yes Derby/Lafayette Layfayette St . - NB 50 25 2 Yes Layfayette St . - SB 43 14 1 Yes New Derby St . - EB 68 24 2 Yes ' Derby St . - WB 57 24 2 Yes Loring/Canal/Jefferson Loring - NB 49 24 1-2 Yes Loring - WB 45 22 1 Yes Canal St . - SB 36 18 1 No i' Jefferson St . - EB 40 20 1-2 Yes Loring/State State Rd . - NB 42 21 1 No Loring Ave. - SB 43 21 1 No ' Loring Ave . - EB 41 17 1-2 Yes Loring/Vinnin ' Loring Ave . - NB 41 20 1 No Loring Ave. - SB 41 20 1 Yes Vinnin St . - WB 30 15 1 No ' Willson/Jefferson Jefferson Ave. - NB 42 21 1 Yes ' Jefferson Ave. - SB 42 21 1 Yes Willson St . - EB 35 18 1 Yes -7- ' 1 TABLE 1 (Continued) INTERSECTION GEOMETRIC DATA ; 1 Intersection Geometrics Street Approach No. of Approach oach Intersection Width Width Lanes Parkinah Highland/Oakland Highland St . - NB 26 13 1 Highland St. - ,B 29 19 Yes Oakland St . - EB 1 Yes 35 17 1 Yes � Oakland St . - WB 33 16 1 Yes 1 1 1 -8- I i pp_ 8 f �r 4$y G s OpOr O 5 F Ir \ S d r \IM1 LEGEND /o R MANUAL TURNING MOVEMENT/VEHICLE CLASSIFICATION COUNT ,e y Q AUTOMATIC TRAFFIC RECORDER COUNT LOCATION c © AUTOMATIC SPEED COUNT LOCATION b" ,mrt C3 14 4rh 17 nu I I 16 12 IS FIGURE 1 ,n„r n`" COUNT LOCATIONS CITY—WIDE TRAFFIC STUDY SALEM. MASS. . r..,rra.ra..\noe�t re rwr.., i 1{ ' C. Daily and Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ' Traffic volume data was obtained from automatic traffic recorder (ATR) counts and manual turning movement counts taken during May and June of 1986 . Figure 1 illustrates the locations of these counts . Average weekday traffic (AWDT) volumes for 1986 are summarized in Table 2 . Automatic traffic recorder summaries are ' contained in the appendix to this report . Table 2 includes both AWDT volumes taken from 23 actual ATR Locations, and AWDT volumes estimated from 1986 manual turning movement counts or traffic data ' by others . The streets are listed from highest to lowest volumes . Weekday manual intersection turning movement and vehicle classification counts (automobiles , trucks, and buses) were recorded ' during May and June, 1986 in 15 minute increments within the 7 : 00-9 : 00 AM and afternoon 4 : 00-6 : 00 PM peak periods . While the . typical morning peak hour was from 7 :30-8 : 30 AM and the typical ' afternoon peak hour was from 4 : 15-5 : 15 PM, congestion is spread over many hours of the day on many of the key roadways in the City. For example, on North Street at Bridge Street -- the highest volume ' location counted -- the volume of traffic ranges from 1700 to 3000± vehicles per hour from 7 AM to 10 PM -- a period of 15 hours on a typical weekday. ' In addition to manual turning movement/vehicle classifi- cation counts , geometric data (refer back to Table 1) was obtained for the above intersections . Turning movement count volumes taken in 1986 are summarized in Figures 2 and 3 . Again, with such high traffic volumes being ' processed during the peak hours , motorists traveling to, from, and through Salem are used to being faced with significant peak period congestion. D. vehicle Speeds vehicle speed measurements over a 24-hour period were taken ' at inhnund Highland Avenue south of Swampscott Road . On Highland Avenue the PM peak hour speed averaged 41 miles per hour; the 85th percentile speed -- the speed at which 85 per cent of the vehicles are travelling at or below -- on a daily basis was 42 miles per ' hour . On Route 114 , at the Salem/Peabody line, average PM peak hour travel speeds on Margin Street approaching Salem were measured at 27 miles per hour (for 20 minutes of the peak hour, average speeds were ' less than 25 miles per hour approaching Salem) ; average southbound Marlborough Road PM peak hour speeds were n-ea-Sure at 32 mi es per hour . ' -10- TABLE 2 ' CITY OF SALEM 1986 AVERAGE WEEKDAY TRAFFIC (Vehicles Per Day) ' 1986 19Y/ Street Location AWDT AWP ' Boston Street Between Essex and Bridge Streets 22, 100 Between Bridge and Hanson Streets 28, 700 Bridge Street Salem-Beverly Bridge 40, 000* ' North of Boston Street 15 ,400* Canal Street North of Loring Avenue 17, 000 Cherry Hill Avenue West of Highland Avenue 2 , 100* Chestnut Street West of Summer Street 2, 300* Congress Street South of Derby Street 8, 100* Derby Street Between Lafayette St . and Hawthorne Blvd . 18 , 900* ' East of Congress Street 4 , 600* Dodge Street East of Washington Street 2, 900 Essex Street West of North Street 14 , 400 t East of North Street 8 , 200 South of Boston Street 25 , 100 North of Boston Street 20, 300* Federal Street East of North Street 4 , 600* ' West of North Street 4 , 600* Hawthorne Blvd. North of Derby Street 17, 300* Highland Avenue South of Jackson Street 24 , 000 ' North of Willson Street 25, 200* South of Willson Street 27 , 800* —a North of Marlborough Road 23 , 300* Z7000 - > South of Marlborough Road 29 , 400* 314, 1cc -� South of Swampscott Road 23 , 500* Z7,zoo Jackson Street East of Highland Avenue 9 , 800 Jefferson Avenue North of Willson Street 14 , 800* South of Willson Street 22 , 800* West of Loring Avenue 21, 400 Lafayette Street South of Derby Street 16 , 200*3 North of Willow Avenue 27, 600 Loring Avenue North of Canal Street 14 , 800 South of Jefferson Avenue 32, 900 North of Paradise Road 28 , 000* West of Paradise Road 9 , 800 West of Vinnin Street 18, 900* * The 1986 estimated AWDT' s are based on 1986 manual turning ' movement counts or historical traffic data . ** The AWDT is based on 1986 partly complete automatic traffic recorder data . -11- a' ' TABLE 2 (Cont. ) ' CITY OF SALEM 1986 AVERAGE WEEKDAY TRAFFIC (Vehicles Per Day) ' 1986 194( Street Location AWDT RWDT ' Lynde Street Between North and Washington Streets 9 , 800* Margin Street South of Riley Plaza 11, 600 Marlborough Road North of Highland Avenue 13 , 700* !S 900 At Salem-Peabody Townline 12 , 500 /Y, sno New Derby Street East of Washington Street 12 , 800 Norman Street West of Margin Street 23 , 800 ' North Street West of Orne Street 28 ,400 Above Bridge Street 42 ,400 North of Essex Street 26 , 300 Paradise Road North of Vinnin Street 19 , 600 ' Summer Street South of Essex Street 18 , 900* South of Norman Street 4 , 400* Swampscott Road South of Highland Avenue12, 000* /5, 000 ' Viiinin _'S£reet East of Loring Avenue 9 , 700* Washington Street North of Norman Street 31, 200** South of Federal Street 21 , 600** West of Riley Plaza 24 , 100 Willson Street East of Highland Avenue 12 , 500* West of Jefferson Avenue 13 , 200* 1 * The 1986 estimated AWDT' s are based on 1986 manual turning ' movement co.:nts or historical traffic data . ** The AWDT is based on 1986 partly complete automatic traffic ' recorder data . -12- 1 i a i Lw 6Y9� X23♦ 'tl ♦ � }tle ^55 /� >00/ , 6'f 59� "28 ROYO k S IOC� `I O b/ry r F � Prt.u.o IY(MOf !4 'e`epe�y<''1' �\OEPtt ♦YfIOF vq os aT o d~ BOOff 10J j r I Z f ry e �aoc JL b4 390 i1.0 J 7 s d BJ f N ) Tts' �) 3x5 B♦Of! °�J �f !fO 9q JJIp BJ fJJfJ a o ` I ffBlF) B) B J \ 0 1 Oy ` 259 STWEET BPIOSE Z 10 SSEPUE - .� � S1Pftt lBBI ) f 9 L L'a9" STREET 9� r 2y 26J v rs9s9 S`e``` � 3♦' ` � 1° $ b"1O 1p y9 2y29 081*6 ` PO AVE... 14 iVOTE yy�o CITY—WIDE TRAFFIC STUDY b\ f♦ SALEM. MASS. ♦!!) r , u..srorrowo 1986 AM PEAK HOUR •txOwxpa(,wC Fx4w[[w5 F iGU0.E 2 ' Yr L �� aJ mmw >s'�1r -�a/ �4d'1 r� Paxo to°�.�•P ye5 yD 4 p)E T s 1 b n O 1 /yfE r fi00 9y 01 d F` 1968 'i � N 44ffl Epf,I'E! ' 4If cjq J EE4EFi �°� v�t'.♦ �Z `9sz N ✓�� j �� r zy a` � °I\` S ye \ 057 '�• ty / .. zz o cl IIPEET pR1061 6!9 ✓\�6 pExUE E` EgpE • •, v �b ItPE It, ,j 0,♦� ff � ax` hLb y SLP(EI ,� T 4/j 30/ �)'� s /bi5 c t'♦E♦� tE` 1 l� G/ tm 05 ff�� < < <mm 69 J 2 0h7 aB� 1 POUIE ' [U4q. pB�a Edo �. �q ♦`EAt E?4UE X669 `♦E CITY-WIDE TRAFFIC STUDY +iq - SALEM. MASS. �aN PM PEAK HOUR 1POEeOXO E !rq SNC ENGINE[XS FIGURE 9 i E. Existing Levels of Service ' A level-of-service analysis was performed for the weekday AM and PM peak travel periods to evaluate the existing quality of flow at study area intersections and ramp terminals using existing roadway geometry and traffic control devices . 1. Capacity Analysis Criteria ' "Level-of-Service" (LOS) , an expression of the quality of traffic flow, is a commonly-used measure of effectiveness of peak hour traffic conditions . It takes into account prevailing roadway and truck volumes , roadway capacity, roadway speed, grades, parking restrictions, vehicle turning movements, pedestrian activity, the progression of traffic flow along an arterial, roadway types and width, as well as ' anticipated delays . LOS is designated in a range from Level "A" , which is the optimal condition where roadway operating conditions are at their best, to Level "F" , indicating traffic jam conditions . Levels "A" through "D" are typically associated with acceptable levels of peak hour traffic operation within urban areas , with LOS "D" the boundary between acceptable and unacceptable traffic congestion. LOS "E" represents the theoretical capacity of an intersection or roadway segment . At Level "E" , the ratio of the approach volume to capacity or v/c ratio of an intersection is between 90 and 100 percent of its theoretical capacity. Often, it is necessary to design for ' LOS "E" conditions in heavily traveled or congested areas -- these are the conditions normally found during peak periods in the City of Salem. Traffic congestion is considered to be unacceptable at Level-of-Service "F" . While link capacity, or ' the capacity of a roadway itself is important in rural areas where intersections are spaced far apart, in the City of Salem, intersections control capacity -- i .e. , intersections usually have less capacity than the intersecting streets themselves . As such, the focus of the Salem traffic capacity analysis was on intersections rather than roadway links . o Unsionalized Intersections Traffic operations at unsignalized ' intersections are given LOS rankings on the basis of major street turning movements into minor cross streets and the minor cross street traffic flow. Except for left or right turning ' movements blocking traffic flow at particularly constricted locations, typically major street traffic is minimally affected by minor street flows . The LOS ranking of an unsignalized intersection is determined by calculating the reserve capacity of traffic movements to and from the minor street . Reserve ' -15- ' Capacity is defined as the number of additional vehicles which can be safely accommodated at an unsignalized intersection for a particular traffic movement . Negative reserve capacities -- found at numerous locations within the City of Salem -- indicate that vehicles are (or would be) accepting gaps in traffic that are considered to be less than safe under ' prevailing conditions . These prevailing conditions are principally affected by the type of control (stop or yield sign) , traffic speeds, and sight distances at an unsignalized intersection. Based on available gaps between vehicles on the l ' major street, the reserve capacity of left turns from the major street and traffic movements from the minor street approach(es) ' can be determined. Table 3 summarizes the relationship between Reserve Capacity, Level of Service and expected traffic delay at unsignalized intersections . o Signalized Intersections Level of Service (LOS) for signalized intersection is defined in terms of the average stopped delay in seconds per vehicle approaching the intersection for the peak 15 minute analysis period of a peak hour . The criteria is also provided in Table 3 . 2 . Evaluation The LOS analyses at studied intersections was performed in accordance with the guidelines of the Highway Capacity Manual Special Report 209 , (1985) . ' Table 4 summarizes the existing (1986) LOS analysis for the unsignalized intersections within the study area . The intersections are listed in order of severity, going from most ' congested to least congested. From the standpoint of peak hour traffic operations , only three of the twenty unsignalized intersections analyzed are operating at level of service D or better -- Essex Street/Fort Avenue/Webb Street (Prusak Square) , and Highland Street/Oakland Street, and Dalton Parkway/Highland Avenue . The 1 remainder of the intersections are experiencing LOS E or F conditions -- with most experiencing LOS F or stop and go conditions . The prevalence of peak period congestion in the City of Salem encourages regular commuters and travelers to use neighborhood streets as shortcuts to avoid traffic congestion throughout much of the day. ' Table 5 lists the existing (1986) LOS analysis results for the signalized intersections which were analyzed. At the five signalized intersections analyzed, two experience LOS E or capacity conditions during the afternoon peak hour -- Highland Avenue/Jackson Street and Highland Avenue/Marlborough Road . The balance of the intersections operate at LOS F. -16- � i TABLE 3 LEVEL-OF-SERVICE CRITERIA ' FOR UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS* Reserve Capacity Level of Service Expected Delay ' 400 or more A Little or no delay 300 to 399 B Short traffic delays ' 200 to 299 C Average traffic delays 100 to 199 D Long traffic delays 0 to 99 E Very long traffic delays Less than 0 F EXTREME DELAYS will be encountered with queuing which may cause severe congestion affecting other traffic movements in the intersection. ' LEVEL-OF-SERVICE CRITERIA FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS* LEVEL-OF-SERVICE AVERAGE STOPPED DELAY PER VEHICLE APPROACHING THE INTERSECTION ' (SECONDS) i A Less than or equal to 5 . 0 B 5 . 1 to 15 . 0 C 15 . 1 to 25 . 0 D 25 . 1 to 40 . 0 E 40 . 1 to 60 . 0 F Greater than 60 * Source : 1965 Highway Capacity Manual Special Report #209 ' -17- r rTo summarize, Rxtreme peak hour congestion is already experienced at 17 of the unsignalized intersections + analyzed, and two of the signalized intersections analyzed. rBecause Salem drivers are accepting gaps in traffic of short i duration -- in many cases 2 - 2 . 5 second gaps (where gaps of r 5 . 5 to 7 seconds depending on the turning movement are considered to be "safe") -- negative reserve capacities are the rule rather than the exception. rE. Safet The City of Salem provided summary information on the r number of accidents at intersections analyzed by the Consultant . Ranked in order from worst to best, Table 6 summarizes the accident experience at these locations . It is not surprising that some of the most congested intersections als_0_h.d1e a significant history of accident problems_. Generally, if a location is averaging more than 5 accidents per year, it could be considered a high accident location. r r r r r r 1 r r -18- { , TABLE 4 1986 CITY OF SALEM UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS RESERVE CAPACITIES AND LEVELS OF SERVICE 1986 AM PEAK HOUR 1986 PM PEAR HOUR Intersection Res. Carel Q2 Res. Can LOS ' Loring/Jefferson -586 F -955 F Washington/Bridge -744 F -575 F Essex/North/Summer -445 F -570 F Loring/Canal -133 F -471 F Washington/Lynde/Church -366 F -258 F Boston/Essex -219 F -350 F Federal/Washington -138 F -283 F Jefferson/Willson -188 F -218 F Loring/Paradise -146 F -231 F ' North/Mason -175 F -183 F North/Federal -96 E-F -251 F Congress/Derby/Hawthorne -46 E-F -259 F ' North;Lynde -744 F -2294 F Essex/Washington 793 E -1953 F Swampscott/Highland 40 E -177 F Chestnut/Norman/Summer -27 F -71 F Loring/Vinnin 91 E -2 F Essex/Fort/Webb 355 A 106 C-B Dalton/Highland 338 B 282 C 1 Available Reserve Capacity (ARC) is expressed in additional vehicles per hour which can be accommodated by safe gaps in the cross street traffic as defined by the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual. A negative reserve capacity indicates that, given the prevailing speeds on the major roadway, that there are not enough safe gaps in traffic (i.e. , the ' required headway, in seconds, between vehicles before a safe turning movement can take place) according to criteria contained in the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual (Transportation Research Board, Special Report #209) . 2 LOS - Level-of-Service ' - Overall Level-of-Service at unsignalized intersections is based on the minor street approach volume criteria for justifying a traffic signal as specified in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD); (see LOS description in text) . 3 Left turn from Washington into Essex Street. ' 4 Left turn from North Street into Lynde Street. ,1 ° r TABLE 5 CITY OF SALEM 1986 LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS TIME PERIOD AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR Location Delay LOS1 Delay LOS (sec/veh) (sec/veh) ' Highland Ave./Jackson St . 25 D 59 E Highland Ave./Marlborough Rd. 16 C 47 E Highland Ave./Willson St . it B 9 B Lafayette St ./Derby St . 14 B 18 C Boston St ./Bridge St . 13 B 30 D I r1 LOS - Level-of-Service Level-of-Service at signalized intersections is based on ' overall intersection stopped delay per vehicle (sec/veh) . 1 1 ' -20- ' FAY,SPOFFORD&TNORNOIK_,INC, ENGINEERS ' TABLE 6 ACCIDENT RANKING OF SALEM INTERSECTIONS 1/1/75 to 12/31/80 1/1/83 to 12/31/83* Total Rear Angle Head Other Total Rear Angle Head Other ' Location Essex/Summer/North 114 26 74 3 13 14 7 5 0 2 ' Willson/Highland Cherry Hill Ave. 82 32 39 5 6 2-6 6 7 0 3 Marlborough/Highland 90 33 47 2 8 6 3 3 0 0 ' Highland/Swampscott 72 23 34 4 11 13 6 5 1 1 Boston/Highland/Essex 71 25 32 3 11 6 2 3 0 1 Jefferson/Loring/ Canal 6B 29 26 6 7 5 4 0 0 1 Congress/Derby 67 16 48 0 3 0 1 5 0 3 Washington/Bridge 55 14 28 2 11 8 2 3 0 3 Essex/Washington 53 15 31 0 7 6 1 4 1 0 Mason/North 46 20 19 2 5 5 0 5 0 0 Federal/North 45 9 30 2 4 4 0 4 0 0 Lafayette/Derby 42 11 25 2 4 7 1 5 1 0 Essex/Webb/Fort 41 8 28 2 3 Q 0 6 0 3 ' Jackson/Highland 40 7 23 1 9 7 2 4 1 0 Federal/Washington 29 7 19 0 3 2 1 1 0 0 Willson/Jefferson 27 6 18 3 0 3 0 1 1 1 Lynde/Washington 26 1 20 0 5 7 2 4 1 0 Lynde/North 20 4 10 0 6 2 1 0 0 1 Vinnin/Loring 18 5 7 1 5 2 0 1 0 1 ' Chestnut/Summer 15 5 7 3 0 2 0 2 0 0 Loring/Leggs Hill 13 7 2 0 4 2 0 1 0 1 Paradise/Loring 8 2 5 0 1 2 1 1 0 0 Highland St./Oakland 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * Accident reporting requirements for 1975-80 was $200 minimum; in 1983 the reporting requirement was $500 (therefore fewer property damage accidents were probably in 1983 than in the typical year between 1975 and 1980. ' III . FUTURE CONDITIONS During the AM and PM peak hours, existing congestion at many of the Salem intersections studied was either approaching or at capacity. Therefore, at congested Salem intersections, future peak hour traffic volumes are not expected to rise as ° much as traffic during the hours closest to the peak hours and average daily traffic volumes . For example, congestion in 1986 that occured from 7:30 AM to 8 PM may start at 6 AM and end at ' 10 PM by 1991. In other words. hours of congestion are expected to increase at many locations . As an example of this phenomenon, peak hour traffic volumes in Peabody Square in the City of Peabody have risen by a total of about 1 percent between 1981 and 1986 . However, average daily traffic through Peabody Square has risen by about 20 percent . It is clear that most of the traffic growth has occurred during the off-peak periods . Congestion in Salem is expected to increase similarly during off-peak periods , since many Salem intersections are operating at capacity during peak hours in 1986 . A. Future Programmed Roadway Improvements Future traffic conditions were analyzed for the period ' between 1987 and 1991 -- a five-year horizon (except for Swampscott Road which was analyzed over the long term) . .By 1991, several roadway improvements affecting City of Salem traffic volumes are already programmed to be implemented and have been assumed to exist at that time . These include: ' o Improvements to Riley Plaza . This safety improvement project is a very high priority of the City of Salem. ' It will include the elimination of the existing Riley Plaza traffic rotary and replacement with a two-way roadway with traffic signals at both ends . Improved pedestrian crossings , modifications to the Riley Plaza ' parking area, and beautification/landscaping improvements are to be included in this project , the design of which is now underway. o Bridge Street or Beverly/Salem Bypass . This four-lane bypass roadway is being completed between the City of Beverly and Boston Street in Salem. A southbound ' off-ramp and northbound on-ramp from Route 114 to the new bypazs road are proposed as a part of this project . This project, with design completed, is now 5' being reviewed by appropriate local, State, and Federal agencies . o Trader ' s Way/First Street Connection. This connection will be completed to allow traffic from Swampscott Road to access Marlborough Road and vice versa without passing through the Highland Avenue/Swampscott Road intersection. -22- ' F{,5A(� # Ave A18 Y ' B. Background Traffic Growth Background traffic growth accounts for new residential/ commercial/industrial developments in the adjacent communities of Swampscott, Peabody, Lynn, Marblehead, and Beverly which are ' not under the control of the City of Salem. It comprises one component of the 1991 traffic growth projections made for the City; the other component being traffic which will be coming to and from estimated development within the City. As densely developed communities, future population projections for the North Shore communities indicate that populations in Salem, Peabody, Lynn, Beverly, Marblehead, and Swampscott are expected to be fairly stable. However, a review of historical count data of roadways in the Salem area indicates that traffic has been growing by approximately 3 percent per year over the past several years , primarily due to new commercial/industrial developments and despite population reductions . Consistent with this growth rate, background i' traffic on Salem study area streets was increased by 3 Percent per year, or a total of 16 percent between 1986 and 1991 . C. Future Salem Development ' In addition to background traffic growth of other surrounding communities, traffic growth is expected due to new developments which will occur in the City of Salem over the next several years . Much of this new development is expected to occur along Swampscott Road and lower Highland Avenue as ' well as the Vinnin Square area . According to the Salem Planning Department, the following new residential, commercial, and light industrial developments are expected to exist by 1991 : SZI� 0 On Highland Avenue, an additional 0 2-bedroom units are proposed on the Fafard property; 0 In Vinnin Square, 500 2-bedroom units are proposed on the 2ieff property; o On Highland Avenue (west side) , 140 2-bedroom units are proposed; o On Swampscott Road, Maynard Plastics has located a ' 170, 000 square feet light industrial facility. In the long term, Swampscott Road has the potential to accommodate significantly more light industrial development . ' -23- D. Traffic Projections ' Traffic from the proposed new residential and commercial developments in Salem by 1991 were distributed to the surrounding street system in accordance with the distribution patterns contained in the Highland Acres Condominiums Draft Environmental Impact Report (HMM Associates, January, 1984) and the Analysis of Traffic Impacts Associated with Fafard Project Changes: Supplement to Final Environmental Impact Report (HMM Associates, January, 1984) . Consistent w tH—the—above estimates of changes in background traffic growth and new development in the City of Salem, traffic projections were performed for the year 1991 for an average weekday (See Table 7) and during the AM and PM peak hours . Figures 4 and 5 illustrate the 1991 AM and PM peak hour turning movement projections . E. Future Levels of Service ' Future levels of service were estimated at all intersections where 1986 counts were taken. Table 8 lists the results of this analysis for unsignalized intersections ; Table 9 lists the results of this analysis for signalized intersec- tions . Existing levels of service are expected to worsen at ' every unsignalized intersection as drivers , becoming more frustrated, will seek alternative routes through neighborhoods, thereby increasing traffic volumes at these unsignalized intersections . Peak hour travel speeds are also expected to be lower than today due to the increased congestion. Three of the signalized intersections analyzed which were operating at LOS E or better in 1986 -- Highland/Jackson, Highland/Marlborough, and Boston/Bridge -- are expected to fail by 1991 due the increased traffic volumes . ' -24- iT1BLE 7 ' CITY OF SALEM 1991 AVERAGE WEEKDAY TRAFFIC (Vehicles Per Day) ' 1991 Street Location AWDT Boston Street Between Essex St . and Bridge St . 25, 700 Between Bridge St. and Hanson St . 33 , 200 Bridge Street Salem-Beverly Bridge 46,400 North of Boston Street 17, 900 Canal Street North of Loring Avenue 19 , 600 Cherry Hill Avenue West of Highland Avenue 2, 400 Chestnut Street West of Summer Street 2, 700 ' Congress Street South of Derby Street 9 , 400 Derby Street Between Lafayette St . and Hawthorne Blvd. 21, 900 East of Congress Street 5 , 300 Dodge Street East of Washington Street 3 , 400 Essex Street West of North Street 16, 700 East of North Street 9 , 500 South of Boston Street 29 , 100 North of Boston Street 23 , 500 Federal Street East of North Street 5 , 300 West of North Street 5 , 300 Hawthorne Blvd . North of Derby Street 20, 100 Highland Avenue South of Jackson Street 27, 800 -` North of Willson Street 29 , 200 ' South of Willson Street 32 , 200 North of Marlborough Road 27 , 000 South of Marlborough Road 34 , 100 ' South of Swampscott Road 27 , 200 Jackson Street East of Highland Avenue 11,400 Jefferson Avenue North of Willson Street 17 , 200 South of Willson Street 26, 400 West of Loring Avenue 24 , 800 Lafayette Street South of Derby Street 18 , 800 North of Willow Avenue 32 , 000 ' Loring Avenue North of Canal Street 17, 200 South of Jefferson Avenue 38, 200 North of Paradise Road 32, 500 ' West of Paradise Road 11, 400 West of Vinnin Street 21, 900 Lynde Street Between North and Washington Streets 11,400 Margin Street South of Riley Plaza 13 , 500 Marlborough Road North of Highland Avenue 15, 900 . At Salem-Peabody Townline 14 , 500 ' TABLE 7 (Cont. ) ' CITY OF SALEM 1991 AVERAGE WEEKDAY TRAFFIC (Vehicles Per Day) ' 1991 Street Location AWDT ' New Derby Street East of Washington Street 14 , 800 Norman Street West of Margin Street 27, 600 North Street West of Orne Street 32, 900 Above Bridge Street 49 , 200 North of Essex Street 30, 500 Paradise Road North of Vinnin Street 22, 700 ' Summer Street South of Essex Street 21, 900 South of Norman Street 5 , 100 Swampscott Road South of Highland Avenue 14 , 000 Vinnin Street East of Loring Avenue 11, 200 Washington Street North of Norman Street 36, 200 South of Federal Street 25, 100 West of Riley Plaza 28, 000 ' Willson Street East of Highland Avenue 14 , 500 West of Jefferson Avenue 15 , 300 1 D TABLE 8 ' 1991 CITY OF SALEM UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS RESERVE CAPACITIES AND LEVELS OF SERVICE ' 1991 AM PEAK HOUR 1991 PM PEAK HOUR Intersection Res. Carel Los2 Res, Can LOSS Jefferson/Loring/Canal -688 F -1167 F Essex/Summer/North -652 F -845 F ' Bridge/Washington -739 F -94 F Boston/Essex -281 F -674 F Jefferson/Willson -399 F -503 F Lynde/Washington/Church -465 F -340 F ' North/Lynne -255 F -412 F Federal/Washington -216 F -419 F Mason/North -316 F -314 F t ' Loring/Paradise -288 F -336 F t Derby/Congress/Hawthorne -165 F -406 F Federal/North -190 F -372 F Essex/Washington -50 F -366 F ' Chestnut/Norman/Summer -108 F -158 F Loring/Vinnin -72 F -138 F Essex/Fort/Webb 297 C-B 29 D-E ' Highland/Dalton 197 D 148 D Highland/Swampscott✓ 464 A 371 B 1 ' l Available Reserve Capacity (ARC) is expressed in additional vehicles per hour which can be accommodated by safe gaps in the cross street traffic as defined by the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual. A negative reserve capacity ' indicates that, given the prevailing speeds on the major roadway, there are not enough safe gaps in traffic (i.e. , the required headway, in seconds, between vehicles before a safe turning movement can take place) ' according to criteria contained in the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual (Transportation Research Board, Special Report #209) . 2 LOS - Level-of-Service ' - Overall Level-of-Service at unsignalized intersections is based on the minor street approach volume criteria for justifying a traffic signal ' as specified in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) ; (see LOS description in text) . Analyzed with median closed on Highland Avenue to prevent all left turns to and from Swampscott Road. Without closure of the median, this intersection would fail badly. 1 ' TABLE 9 CITY OF SALEM 1991 LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY ' FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR 1 ' INTERSECTION DELAY LOS DELAY LOS (sec/veh) (sec/veh) ' Highland Ave./Jackson St. 103 F 245 F (15 C)1 (37 D)l .i'1 Highland Ave./Marlborough Rd. 467 E 240 F 11 E Highland Ave./Willson St. 27 D 23 C Lafayette St./Derby St. 21 C 37 D3 Boston St./Bridge St. 34 D 107 F ' 1 With modifications in geometry - 2 through lanes on Highland Avenue on both approaches (See Recommendations Section) . 2O With modifications in geometry - double left turn lanes from Highland Avenue into Traders Way (See Recommendations Section) . 3 With Riley Plaza improvements. 1 t t 1 o GOO ° 1/ O X20 A0.0 � 91 00 O 2 d o 0 � o ti °o J ' I — /°/ _;05o I` Soo go �soo .- . 1� ✓� 170g0 �\• O J / IOZDd0 420 \\` OJ lee Fy'/ P ti 1 J p p P ESS" �I � � %)p � :Jrsf(( / +oe �O v✓1y� `1L \\.\ B90w //0 I vliP (300 J/AOO 50 7 0� 1 Sj%ER 1 a ; S,c� U TaO xEEMUE �Q - 0 c 9 , StPEEt J9gJ \ �`•' ��Z 5gG0� J/yfF i ,goo/ 3 po ° \� �� �5p STREET Ego st\EO . pv 600 5"�/1 \ to P^OC 0 n o 0 0 —30 ,0040 J pl f r to '0 ,putt `ps AUA/yfi /4YUf 490 CITY-WIDE TRAFFIC Sl UDY J'9JF SALEM, MASS. 1951 AH PEAK HOUR rx..soossoao A PI F14 uRE 4 A q O p ✓ J XI6NlPPY 1t l0 5a0 S ' �P^POPO`t'N mmnn a ♦\BlP\` 'IFYUF \AO pq m ry i loco 15 sry " / °✓/ `zlo w C 5j0^ 0 9isF 20 FFp 00 vh0 \� r/x r li e210 � \V -10 > b SIPEET L NP ` IPI{i: F D y O J� ✓,120 PP(MUE 10 l I\PlE\ ,✓FYYI f \ — 1� 0.a000 �_ o Y X01 'e bD Si PFfi 00 O v N 0 ♦ o�.O / 1 e.0 y4 !i 0 gp �P�P SP♦t♦ �.,� �c J � ♦ � 'so hhyu ' 0d �� , 0 / t✓ ,�G T� 0 0 9b hOaO^ 23.50 fs °o0 60 IpH/Yi o0` `N 1 ` 70 IYFIOf 01,• 000 00 J 1 ogo �pUR m d h�D 51 CITY-WIDE TRAFFIC STUDY 1� SALEM, MASS. si> 19991 Pm PEAK MOUi1 FF/ s.. zrorso.o• „row. I i6J 0.E 5 ,1 {' IV. RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENT PLAN A. General Objectives The general objectives of the recommended improvement ' plan for the City of Salem are: o To improve traffic flow within and through the City of Salem without degrading safety; and o To develop improvements which will improve access from Route 128 into and through Salem; ' o To develop roadway improvements which will allow these roadways to adequately handle future traffic within the Swampscott Road/Highland Avenue area . Because the improvement plan has been developed within the context of improving regional travel patterns (i .e . , travel between Peabody, Salem, Marblehead, Swampscott , Beverly, and Danvers) , it is anticipated that most of the proposed improvements should be eligible for state and federal funding assistance . The proposed conceptual improvement plan is intended to be phased over a ten year period . Those improvements which have relatively low costs and high benefits would be phased first . In order to provide an objective basis for evaluating ' the various options , the Consultant considered the following criteria as being critical to examine the potential need for improvements . o Severity of capacity problems; o Severity of safety problems; o Severity of neighborhood intrusion problems ; and 0 Cost . ' B. Description of Recommended Improvement Plan 1. General Recommendations Problem: Accident Data Not Readily Available Solution: The City Police Department should computerize its accident reporting system. This will provide the Planning Department and City officials with a more easily accessible accident data base to identify high accident ' -31- locations on a regular basis and re-evaluate improvement priorities if ■ necessary. '! Problem: How to Set Priorities for the Maintenance of Traffic Signs , Signals and Pavement Markings Solution: Complete a sign, signal, and pavement ' marking inventory. Numerous signs, pavement markings, and signals were found not to conform to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices . It is recommended that the ' City use the sign, signal, and pavement marking inventory (cross-referenced by traffic volumes to determine priority) as a basis for upgrading its pavement marking and signing program to conform to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices . On heavily-travelled arterials , uniform signs , signals , and pavement markings are particularly important, since Salem receives a significant number of visitors from 1 outside the Boston metropolitan area . Problem: How to Set Priorties for Deteriorating ' Pavement on Roadways Solution: Use video equipment to inventory City roadway pavements once each year (preferably in April) and develop a pavement management and maintenance plan which is updated annually. Like ' the pavement marking, signing , and signal inventory, the pavement management plan should be cross-refer- enced to traffic volumes in order to set priorities . -32- 1 1 2 . Intersection and Street Recommendations 1 For ease of presentation, recommendations for individual intersections and streets are described from north to south through the City. At the end of this section, a list 1 of order-of-magnitude costs and funding sources are described and a general set of priorities for improvement projects is provided. •1 o Essex Street at Webb Street and Fort Avenue Problem: High Accident Location with Limited Sight Distance Due to Adjacent Buildings Solution: Install a four-way stop sign. 1 Four way stop-sign warrants are met on the basis of accident experience and .1 approach volumes . In addition, a yellow approach lane on Essex Street should be repainted white to conform to the MUTCD. Improvements are shown on 1 Figure 6 . 1 1 1 1 1 -33- 1 ' �' ` .y ,�•� x - _ - . }•-�cx�aL, KI .cam 1 .'. �` L � y,;,,. -� V3�"I ��:C R ! •AL1•.! � � •.h�YYY������///...��\\\w������. q^ `.\ \\\ �il'.�. �J—•F•�_�llti��:L_�.lT* .�' �If 1.. I wl- 4� es ' � �\ � .n• ., a1 J.�`^'':;� �^.',",.r`S., tee/:, -� ^` � '� - � `�, .: w711. . ate. - c'-�. �, � .f'•. ,' v '�, �� II ,, `�, u• •Yrs ~ �: �`�t�' wi I97, .;; ., � . •rte, C dcus F 1 -1 ;ul ;• All 1� �•� 1 w_ • 1 I w- 1 �a�� / -�Jf a �1 7:1 -' I • I I,ia •�. (l((77, SPP �rl '/�ti" + •• ll�r •. /Z�1yy�iT, iCi /5 '-°•i r / �A •*.. If IL g` it �� �~ / r.- •.Y•�. Jy!•r„ ati ow 41 I� yS D� -ml '•lr M•, � loc at 1� RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS ESSEX STREET AT WEBB STREET AND FORT AVENUE SCALE: 1" = 200' FIGURE 6 1 o Conaress Street at Derby Street and Hawthorne Boulevard 1 Problem: Peak Period Traffic Congestion; Parking Shortage Near Pickering Wharf 1 Solution: Install a traffic signal . Restripe approach lanes to separate left turns from through traffic as shown in Figure 7. Convert the two-way Derby Street/ Hawthorne Boulevard connector road to one-way northwestbound for safety reasons . One benefit of converting the Derby Street/Hawthorne Boulevard connector road to one-way operation is the possibility of providing angle parking on the right side of the street (parallel parking is allowed currently) . This change would increase the amount of available parking . A two-foot wide island is proposed to a separate the angle parking area safely from the moving traffic lane on the Derby Street/Hawthorne Boulevard connector road. Proposed improvements are illustrated in Figure 7 . � I 1 -35- RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS CONGRESS STREET AT DERBY STREET AND HAWTHORNE BOULEVARD SCALE: 1" = 200' FIGURE 7 • r 1 • • I r • • '• • • v r r 1 1 • V 00 .J I,•r , ••or w ••• i w wr Al is 31 10 10 fit . m I : a " `� s s• '% 1 ' IM rrr .. I Nr .1 ✓�f •� �\ t.elO wn 1p • , •ll t1•frrw � I t t / •.. I `� o �i «o 3 647 I 41 v-yr .�;c ...• , �' r, 1 ' o Access between Route 126 and Salem Problem: Significant Traffic Congestion Along Route 114 and the Boston Street (Salem) to Main Street/Lowell Street (Peabody) Corridors Solution: Create a pair of three-lane arterials to replace the existing pair of two lane arterials (See Figure B) . Within Salem, North Street would become Route 114 West with two westbound lanes and one eastbound lane; Route 114 East would enter Salem from the Salem/Peabody line via Main Street/Boston Street with two eastbound lanes and one westbound lane. With a double left turn lane at Bridge Street, Route 114 East would continue up Bridge Street as two northbound lanes and one southbound lane to North Street . At North Street, Route 114 East and West traffic would merge back together . This proposed circulation pattern is consistent with the existing traffic flow patterns exhibited on the streets involved. It would increase the ' traffic-carrying capacity of the streets by 25-30 percent . This capacity increase would mean fewer ' hours of congestion on both corridors . Intrusion of through traffic into nearby neighborhoods would be reduced with through traffic staying on the the new "split" Route 114 corridor . Signals along both corridors should be coordinated to ensure a smooth flow of ' traffic in the major direction of travel . ' The travelled way of the typical three-lane Route 114 cross-section (suggested minimum cross-section of 33 ' -- for three 11 ' lanes , two in the ' major direction of traffic flow and one in the minor direction of traffic flow) . Parking on one side can be provided with a minimum cross-section of 41 ' ; parking on both sides with a -37- i 0 61\ ih / \ a 1x7v)j 1 \ _ cuv"icoz .9, P 1;x `I S�•-y. '" cwt. in r /•\ f c��\ �'^p �/- !1f4 Daher �F FyT a! C CIO {`'efP�1P c v /l ?§G' w h' •'o 3 ar � `�°o� .'+���+. F p- i,�. S"'o s�° �t�;� •1 ` `�,b,Q\ P,�° � � �a,n is e-, �$♦ t/I c � 0 C o i V••'b .MI Pa.cn .°r s /1' W K 1 �1 M O' S: h 4 i P bP.Y 9 o ' m.�•''9 ai/' a �,l`,� y r+.l� F( �E.."s.nr e �, g•f44 �: ,I t•�„u <s �i.b� m \� ^ / C° `` o Ir. .St Op rStF _p� 1 //�/(y C•p, pK{ p e, IIPe wt r• T. •,` . • .e 6 P6^• e M ..T ,•. O O L ✓? e ! ` " ;i 7 tOrdr (I Egvnro.i .;• - d • 7 �P°l/ 'Yietn. a r•� 4 • .. . �. 3M•.- ..r 5' G T. ' �$c ni YI Tp° . ... 8 ¢ •::o �e•D �-e'c � ( � s4�r., 44 So�✓r� �,# o ,*� or.ePr.rl:lrs•�'!•�— p /: . -� �`-_ , p � ,eren.Y.., q .• ' j'� �'� IS , I I u I I f.+er e :�C G.no.a µN.- r'• P ! r ¢t,• .•.� 6 +own r If Sr I re.utT y�,4.9 Ownre.�i O � I nee s¢I r. •�:.'YG'^�>_SL 1a, �� 4t � N , /it IE . . 7'. �O it}4 C6 -go*• f4 . FUTURE S/GNAL S P• '�s' s�=a ref SPL . oNe�t SI l4�i ' b�i '•s \ �' 1' ''y-r Rae• / ° Q Ex/STING SIGNAL 5 �t:�; e: . S I' ��'j; _ r , /"4.l �'�� • ,S..r`,.rLlc "Si�ea .' 4"=re 4o" �., i-I c. l x �f Valtlna k�? sr\;' ewe s fP ;( •S` q•Ee u. �l ' rPHII ! rjI Q,i'I �K �•' ee�•' '�_ B'oa r� ' ' •/ • jlv •4�Si��i\Rft�o r= .® l :u I",Ohione •P . 4e' I " 8 e fe e� s 1 ,� 1 4 r, �, P{-A.��e y 0.,• •i�: N ..]/J I _ I I ^�.•`'e� o t .r e•y sr. �T' �2 ti°°,:'`v, .i '1 t, s.,• so `�V` L��^ ',1? t•I t^it.`�'kE4\^ 'lsr:`'. �? .'f%sv �� \• a c�4?, 'r'P•„ ' :i\?e •e.L �� p�4:�+.=' °Q h �: aiQ o„a« ¢ S+:�''1'+�,e,+• . 4, RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS ROUTE 114 IN SALEM AND PEABODY ' SCALE: 1" = 200' FIGURE 8 o Access between Route 128 and Salem (Continued) minimum cross-section of 49 ' . At i critical signalized and unsignalized intersections with significant left ' turn demands, a 10 ' wide left turn lane is envisioned for the peak direction of travel . . Within the City of Peabody, Route 114 East would generally follow the existing roadways designated as Route ' 114 between Route 128 and Pulaski Street . The bridge on Andover Street approaching Wilson Square would be widened to provide three approach lanes . Two eastbound travel lanes and one westbound travel lane would be provided on Central Avenue into Peabody Square . Following Main Street through Peabody Square, Route 114 East would continue on Main Street through ' downtown Peabody into Salem along Boston Street as described above. From North Street at the Salem/Peabody line, t Route 114 West would be via Margin Street in Peabody. Margin Street would provide two westbound lanes between the Salem/Peabody line and Pulaski Street . In the westbound direction, Pulaski Street would be entered via a double left turn lane from Margin Street . Pulaski Street would have two southbound lanes and one northbound lane between Wilson Square and Margin Street . At Wilson Square, improvements would be provided to merge the Route 114 East and West segments . Between Wilson Square and Route 128, four lanes ' would be provided . -39- ;1 o Jefferson Avenue and Canal Street Bridge Connection Problem: How to Accommodate Cross-community } Traffic Desires Between Jefferson and Canal Streets; Reduce congestion at 1 Riley Plaza and at the intersection of Jefferson Avenue and Canal Street. Solution: Provide a new connection over the 1 railroad yard between Jefferson Avenue and Canal Street -- possibly at Ocean Avenue. This connection is estimated - � to reduce traffic flow into Riley Plaza ' by from 3 , 000 to 5, 000 vehicles per day. It would also provide an additional corridor for cross-community traffic. Environmental and engineering feasibility studies will be required to implement the proposed new connection. A two-lane bridge, 40-feet wide, with one lane in each direction, is envisioned to be supplemented by signalization. 1 i t 1 .1 1 -40- ' o Goodhue Street and Harmony Grove Road ' Problem: Congestion on Boston Street (Salem)/Main Street/Lowell Street Corridor. ' Solution: Remove some of the westbound truck traffic to Route 128 by using an alternative corridor comprised of ' Goodhue Street to Harmony Grove Road. Goodhue Street would remain one-way westbound. Since the Goodhue Street/Harmony Grove Road corridor connects with Walnut Street in the City of Peabody (the intersection of Walnut and Central Avenue is to be signalized in the near future) , the improvement of this corridor as a westbound truck route would reduce traffic demands on the Boston Street (Salem)/Main Street/ Lowell Street (Peabody) corridor . Improvements would consist of pavement resurfacing , restriping and signing . Figure 9 illustrates the proposed truck route concept . 1 1 s t �� -41- ! �C_ i• 1� If l— ❑ 1•��ti.�n'_ ��".•��?::�L ��1r—i:• Il r•1 '• :I � `/ ^inLN s t=1..t-r tT . {_ .I �• r � ,.... .�;jl j �i , . \ ; �. � 1.+ '. lei i : "L F� !: ; •i �. -1 /� \, ``� `\ �• 1' �\ � .171 1!y'.'t�;'�•� i:. J �. ��;._ ;� yam.=1 :_ 3 1 1 '�• l� ` 1 I•r7- I '1 s �:� !� .ISO \�•, :. t \ _�: x",11-',j�i©{' '�� '�_ M � . ' x_`�:•ri- t ; z ,; �. -- - 011 cr qqf oil I�I['I " lid f--`-�" `���� � � �: �,�'•;F t� ) �•�� ,�_ � - \• ! l`]�.•r LJ e; �I = `,—�� -;��f 'CP ' ''41 r••---�- C3,•,�,� AA r� r •� '- :Y i i ! N IF I �z tI t0 �•:.— :i� Vlr •~ .�'= Lf\ 1 11.�•• 7s•� .e ✓ in ell 1" O ti74, `� .. ' RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS GOODHUE STREET AND HARMONY GROVE ROAD SCALE: 1" = 200' FIGURE 9 0 Boston/Essex Streets and Highland Avenue/Jackson Street Intersections ' Problem: Peak Period Traffic Congestion and a High Number of Accidents , 1 Solution: Boston/Essex Streets Relocate the statue and signalize the it intersection. Restripe the pavement as shown on Figure 10. 1 In its present location, the statue clearly contributes to the safety problems at this intersection. 1 Separate left turn and right turn lanes should be provided on Boston Street approaching Essex Street, and a double left turn lane on Essex Street 1 northbound approaching Boston Street . Jackson/Highland Streets Modify the existing traffic signal and provide a separate right turn lane for northbound Highland Avenue traffic . Coordinate the Jackson/Highland/Essex signal with the proposed signal at Boston/Essex Streets . Figure 10 ' illustrates the recommended improvements . The existing signal at Highland ' Avenue/Essex/Jackson Street should be retimed to reduce the maximum amount of time allocated to the left turn onto Jackson Street from southbound Essex Street . 1 1 €1 -43- ;1 J — _fir1, -.^ . V+/ _•,'J L�a1�'.� RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS BOSTON/ESSEX STREETS AND HIGHLAND AVENUE/JACKSON STREET SCALE: i" = 200' FIGURE 10i lop ffil AL e 47�y..� it '••' • p MOVE ' ONUMEN � X W � o 41•• " 17 / •N . s. . / all .. . -�ACK50/V � 1 ..q ► s`T ' .r• r. C3 :1 ' r 1 � � I 1 1 o Cherry Hill Avenue/Willson Street/Highland Avenue it Problem: Very High Accident Location; Peak Hour 1� Congestion; Offset Intersection; Vertical Curvature of Highland Avenue; Speeding on Highland Avenue. Solution: Reduce the speed limits approaching intersection to 25 miles per hour 9 � through signage on the Willson Street and Highland Avenue approaches . Revise speed limits by ordinance, if nece--sary. A minor approach widening and pavement striping modifications to separate left turn lane on southbound ' Highland Avenue approaching the intersection. See Figure 11 for recommended improvements . ' A southbound left turn lane which provides access to Willson Street from Highland Avenue could be provided by ' widening the existing pavement cross-section to 54 ' (four 11 ' through lanes and one 10 ' left turning lane) minimum pavement width on Highland ' Avenue (48 ' exists today) . A 3-foot widening on both sides may be possible. Left turning vehicles often ' block southbound Highland Avenue through traffic during peak hours , perhaps leading to rearend collisions . The vertical curvature of Highland ' Avenue aggravates the accident potential at this intersection. j i' -45- .1 �./S ter./� \ Jr• /� r _ � • , ' W/LLSON ST i 16, ;ki N a / d� Ley* _ Wit: ^ n ,�j ',� — �a '�� �`,,l• u I•�� ' •rr• I -� 1 : `�,� `r .� . .1,•: r ` ' mai' •��rc. �IL::�Ver �L�{ �I °� ill •' 1�1, r•9 LI' j rr ^, RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS CHERRY HILL AVENUE/WILLSON STREET/HIGHLAND AVENUE ' I SCALE: 1" = 200' FIGURE 11 ' o Willson Street/Jefferson Avenue ' Problem: Peak Period Congestion and Poor sight Distance Aggravated by On-street Parking at the intersection. Solution: Signalize and remove the existing on street parking on both Willson Street and Jefferson Avenue for 200 ' in ' advance of the intersection. The on-street parking on Willson Street and Jefferson Avenue should be removed ' because it significantly reduces the capacity of the intersection to accommodate peak period traffic ' volumes . Figure 12 illustrates the proposed improvements at this intersection. ' -47- ' I ;. � t. ,.�,.� �`�•'''' r.:. .•.,—v:°.fy;'tip' '•. `moi•��\tl '�: '• _ L •f. \` 1 r��ti�f: ��,'n ' a .' IZ It It •.' •b K _ ^.:' l�; �.r /••`. ,'mil ti' �+t,�r 7R`l\ �f +. T j:/ " .•.�=.�I�•� l� •fir.. i`T�` �Ca� •' `\'/r�� �i Mfr � j .✓��'. •La.r!--� f• ��„•i ;'^� •o.c J'^ - '��' / Z. is - t�.. .f � ` �///n�• � '� ' ��� •I•�.- I i^ A%r/ ) � f e� l�r q:� Thr r r i ��!- J_ / /�'1�/ ..• ` �\.. /^ Ijy/ •.�� 17.• x "_ �• / •y. "a \ M1 IJ i •� rlUlU� �I� s• 4 ,• " ` r ♦a�J:"A�'C.\� /♦qv�, .� • �^ `��('-�.J�J f` oy/�i�.-.�� ` /r 'a. ))'^C � ` " " r•`�'= 'L'.110 O ,o t a -�517' .f •• ',♦,,r•i,�)`Y• �.(/ � I s 1 ,^ �^/� �. °off \ s. izt 33 4 \ -, n. •:ey ..�" `moi. ,k"1! B� .4 � Il�Ji� ���...�` r�?�., \� . t_ ' . . , -'. 11 I� •"' c r\j7,o fir. f�C�i r^. er u•f• • .� ti �� ' rf�!t^� 17� � !`6ltll' ;� r- Ali f'�V 1"0�� �'�. h,�•fc. �1'a j�l�•YPrI A • �G � �J V,1' ��=14 ��� '�`��/. I !rte -.---. �L,L l,L.��^\•V �•( ♦. ' ' ��� _-` f' •( ••J��� _Ili.j.� ,- 1 ` �����••4. •,. ( V'_. RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS WILLSON STREET/JEFFERSON AVENUE ' SCALE: 1" = 200' FIGURE 12 1 ' o Loring Avenue/Jefferson Avenue/Canal Street ' Problem: Significant Peak Period Congestion; Poor Intersection Design with Hazardous Geometry Solution: Signalize and Channelize the intersection. Create a one-way pair ' from a new street on the abandoned railroad right-of-way (made one way southbound) and Broadway (made one-way northbound) . The Jefferson Avenue/ ' Canal Street intersection could then be signalized in an efficient phase operation. Access to adjacent land ' uses would be retained . Recommei:ded improvements are shown in Figure 13 . I ' 1 t 1 1 -49- 1 _ _—_ _ � ` \ � li � \•� fir• �?,/( �" •4,.� \ • .. . . � �� i 1: p,13 ,,,� �_'• ?• �' ate' 02 ol —jcy op 00 //��/ � •�] /may 19) � •> I�`• \ `( \\ � / / .. � '+ ;,� • .mss . , ,,r \. \; y.,' \ I tc 1 nti� n• \ f' LORING AVENUE/JEFFEROSONMAVOENUE/CANAL STREET ' SCALE: 1" = 200 ' FIGURE 13 I i o Loring Avenue at Legg ' s Hill Road ("Dead Man' s Curve" ) Problem: Sharp Curve on Roadway Presents a Traffic Hazard ' Solution: In the short term, channelize and divide Loring Avenue to provide a protected left turn lane. Improve the existing signage and pavement ' markings . Eliminate left turns out of Legg ' s Hill Road. Figure 14 illustrates the recommended ' improvements . In the long term, if new residential ' development is to be allowed on Legg ' s Hill Road, it is recommended that the existing Legg ' s Hill Road bridge be relocated to eliminate the dog leg in f , Legg ' s Hill Road . This long term 11 option involves wetlands , but is by far the safer of the two options and allows ' left turns out of Legg ' s Hill Road as well as into Legg ' s Hill Road due to the improved sight distance it affords . 1 1 1 -51- Y�"• 'r '/!�" `�,/ J r 7 :7 � rJl.1 �� �:j. _ �-ter• r� 'i° �/ �'-'l fir, / ..l r� �. •. •� �'b. tow to �1 nom! v ,• N � v'v / �:Y/ ^\C:/�^�\..��.L +��1 ,�:./:: ,' ly > j —✓ ALTERNAT/VE LOCAT/pN Y fz0 Oi^ � . ��•�&Ca •rya' ,, NEW BRIDGE I ape Vk- r , r RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS { - LORING AVENUE AT LEGG' S HILL ROAD 1 ;SCALE. 1 - 200 ' FIGURE 14 1 r o Loring F,-,•enue/Paradise Road, Loring Avenue/Vinnin Street Vinnin Street/Paradise Road Problem: Poor Sight Distance for Traffic Exiting on Loring Avenue at Paradise Road; Peak Period Traffic Congestion (Problem Will Intensify with New Development in the Vinnin Square area) . Solution: Coordinate improvements with the Town of Swampscott . Widen Vinnin Street on the south side apFroaching Paradise Road to provide a three-lane pavement cross-section including two eastbound lanes and one westbound lane. The two eastbound lanes would include a left turn lane and shared through/right turn lane. Make Loring Avenue one-way southwestbound between Paradise Road and Vinnin Street (See Figure 15) . The Vinnin Street approach to Paradise Road (Route 1A) should be 38 ' wide consisting of two 12 ' approach lanes, one for left turning traffic and the other for through and right turning traffic and a 14 ' departure lane . The existing Paradise Road/Vinnin Street 1 traffic signal would require modifications . Furthermore, a small part of the Stop and Shop parking lot ' on the southeast corner of the intersection should be taken to improve the alignment of Vinnin Street at Paradise Road. A second option, which was considered and rejected, involved the signaliza- tion of the Vinnin Street/Loring Avenue and Loring Avenue/Paradise Road intersections . While signal warrants are met today at both the Loring Avenue/ Paradise Road intersection and the Vinnin Street/Loring Avenue inter- sections , coordinating new signals at these two intersections with the existing signal at Vinnin Street would present significant problems . 1 -53- I � . i o 1 I ' / ` I Siov / ,\ •'.+( ,'.1 . yam'.\ /�-�. L i � /��l •2. \-n� A1C. '/.i. .\✓/•1� — 1. II' .l >' I� ', X•Q '.� 4. .�' '7 l jwv.i\ D ✓/ RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS VINNIN SQUARE SCALE: 1" = 200' FIGURE 15 , o Salem/Swampscott Road Highland Avenue To MBTA Commuter Rail Tracks .r Problem: Poor Alignment; Unsafe Pavement Surface; Inadequate Pavement Width to Accommodate Long Term Traffic Growth Solution: The entire length of Salem/Swampscott Road .within the City of Salem should have a minimum 48 ' cross-section (four-lane cross-section) . Its pavement should be designed to carry high volumes of trucks . The roadway should have a minimum 40-mile per hour design speed with a desirable ' right-of-way of 80 ' minimum of 60 ' in tight areas so as not to preclude future roadway improvements . At the intersection of Salem/Swampscott r Road and First Street, provide 50 ' curb radii to accommodate trucks; a traffic i signal may be warranted at this intersection with t e recommended closure of the Highland Avenue median at Salem/ Swampscott Road. Within the City, the existing Salem/ Swampscott Road right-of-way varies from 40 to 60 feet in most cases; it appears to r widen to about 100 feet near First Street. To accommodate a proposed minimum 40-mile per hour design speed, horizontal curvature of the re-aligned segments of Swampscott Road should be limited to a 510 ' centerline radius . A closed drainage/filtration system ,`4s should be provided to prevent pollution of the Thompsons Meadow wetlands area . Street lighting should be improved the entire length of Salem/Swampscott Road within the City of Salem. xr 6 d : i -55- FAY.SPOFFO FD b TRORNOIRE.INC. ENGINEERS o Salem/Swampscott Road (Continued) ' MBTA Commuter Rail Tracks to Essex Street in Swampscott Problem: Sharp Dog-leg Curve; Narrow Railroad Bridge; Poor Horizontal and Vertical Curvature of Pavement Alignment; Unsafe Pavement Surface; Poor Lighting; Inadequate Pavement Width to Accommodate Long Term Traffic Growth Solution: Coordinate Improvements with the Town of I Swampscott . It is recommended that a 0 . 5 mile segment of the Salem/Swampscott Road be relocated northerly to approximately ' the Salem/Swampscott line. Directly across from Bradlee Mall Road, Relocated Swampscott Road would be constructed in a northwesterly direction on the western boundaries of the Loring Towers and Zieff properties . The existing three-way Bradlee Mall Road/Loring Avenue intersection would become a four-way intersection with the new terminus of Salem/Swampscott Road. A traffic signal ' is recommended at the new intersection. A 60 ' easement would be required of each owner . Continuing northwesterly, the new 48 ' roadway would follow the edge of the ' Forest River Conservation area just prior to crossing the MBTA tracks on a new elevated railroad bridge. It would rejoin ' the existing Salem/Swampscott Road alignment west of the MBTA tracks . See Page 69 for recommended improvements . Based on the information available, such a road would be very costly and time consuming to implement, but would represent a significant safety and traffic circulation improvement for regional as well as localized travel . A new traffic signal would be required at the Relocated Salem/Swampscott Road intersection across from Bradlee Mall Road. Except for Salem/Swampscott Road, which would have a four-lane cross- section, the remaining legs of this intersection would have three-lane configurations ; two lanes entering and one lane departing the intersection. In every -56- o Salem/Swampscott Road (Continued) MBTA Commuter Rail Tracks to Essex Street in Swampscott case, the two approach lanes would consist of a left turn lane and shared through/right lane. A minimum 48 ' cross-section is envisioned for the Salem/ Swampscott Road leg approaching the 1 intersection, with minimum 40 ' pavement widths on the other three legs of the proposed intersection. The existing signalized intersection of Essex Street and Salem/Swampscott Road within the Town of Swampscott has a substandard design. The 20 ' wide railroad bridge does not meet current minimum design standards . Coupled with poor intersection sight distance, the steep approach of Salem/Swampscott Road into the intersection, the offset intersection of Eastman Avenue, and access to a gas station in the middle of the intersection, safety at this intersection is clearly deficient . ' With new development occurring in the area of Salem/Swampscott Road and Vinnin ' Square, the existing Essex Street and Salem/Swampscott Road intersection will become even more critical than it is today. Salem/Swampscott Road carries an estimated 12 , 000 vehicles per day at its intersection with Essex Street in ' Swampscott . Essex Street carries nearly 19 , 000 vehicles per day based on 1986 counts on Loring Avenue near Vinnin ' Square. With a new intersection at Bradlee Mall Road and a realignment of Swampscott Road approximately at the Swampscott/Salem boundary, the existing traffic signal and railroad bridge at Essex Street could be eliminated; alternative Lynn Sand & Stone quarry access can be provided. The proposed Salem/Swampscott Road Relocation is considered to be a long 1 range improvement which should not be -57_ i , o Salem/Swampscott Road MBTA Commuter Rail Tracks to Essex Street in Swampscott (Continued) 1 precluded by the City of Salem. If and when opportunities arise, the City should obtain the necessary right-of-way from abutting landowners . At this time, it is understood that the Loring Towers and Zieff property owners would be effected; the remainder of the land affected is owned by the City. If possible, the City should obtain, a 60 ' wide roadway easement from the two affected property owners . If, based on further feasibility studies , part of the new roadway alignment turns out to be on the other side of the Swampscott Town Line, the City could, at that time, adjust easements accordingly. Since parklands and wetlands may be affected by the proposed road, costs and implementation time related to the proposed relocation segment are expected to be relatively high compared to other roadway improvements which may be pursued by the City. The environmental permitting process alone could end up costing the City (or private developers) several hundred thousand dollars and would probably involve more than 5 years . Therefore, the potential for the relocation of Swampscott Road within the short term is highly unlikely. Key ' environmental issues which would need to be resolved include: The exploration of ways to eliminate or mitigate potential Section 4f impacts (i .e. , the section of the 1966 US DOT Act which prohibits the use of land from a significant publicly-owned park, recreation area, wildlife or waterfoul refuge, or any significant historic site unless it can be shown that 1) there are no reasonable or prudent alternatives to the use of the land from the property; and 2) the proposed action includes all possible planning to minimize harm to the adjacent property resulting from such use) . -58- 1 o Salem/Swampscott Road MBTA Commuter Rail Tracks to Essex Street in Swampscott (Continued) Wetlands environmental impacts; Accommodation of the access requirements of Lynn .Sand & Stone; The 20 ' -22 ' vertical clearance required for a new structure over the B&M railroad . Maintenance of traffic during construction of the relocated portion of Swampscott Road . Given potential wetlands and Section 4f impacts , the State will probably require a lengthy environmental process for the proposed realignment . For example, if applicable, Section 4f would require the examination of roadway alternatives which do not dissect the Forest River Conservation area . The City would have to demonstrate during the environmental process that the proposed realignment is the only reasonable and prudent alternative. A wetlands evaluation study would be required, as a first step, to determine ' the exact boundary of the Thompson Meadow wetlands . Assuming that the area is subject to flooding (i .e . , 100 year storm) or the wetlands are bordering vegetated wetlands, the Wetlands Protection Act (MGL Chapter 131, Section 40) will apply. Based on observations , it appears possible to construct the relocated portion of Swampscott Road on a viaduct without disturbing the wetlands significantly. If displace- ments of more than 5, 000 square feet of bordering vegetated wetlands are required, the roadway improvements would require a time consuming, and possibly unattainable, variance from the Department of Environmental Quality Engineering { 1 -59- o Salem/Swampscott Road MBTA Commuter Rail Tracks to Essex Street in Swampscott (Continued) (DEQE) . Any wetlands or floodplains displaced would require replacement . An Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 permit may also be required for any work needed within the wetlands area. Ideally, the relocated roadway would be designed to avoid the wetlands area entirely. ! Detailed engineering feasibility and environmental studies will be required to determine the precise route of the roadway and the best way to build a railroad bridge which minimizes impacts) . Time-consuming and extensive coordination with the B&M railroad/MBTA will also be necessary. Such a study -- with the products being a detailed base plan, right-of-way plans , and plotted centerline of the proposed roadway at 1" = 40 ' scale and a 40-mile per hour design speed -- is estimated at a minimum of $75, 000 due to the need for field survey and the unavailability of right-of-way information and recent photogrammetry mapping . ' In summary, the City should actively pursue the Swampscott Road relocation if : I 1) The funds for the environmental permitting and the design can be obtained principally through the private sector; and 2) The Town of Swampscott desires to pursue the same relocation alternative as well . Salem cannot acheive it alone. As soon as possible, City of Salem representatives should meet with Town of Swampscott representatives and urge local officials to take a position on the proposed relocation of Swampscott Road (replacement of the existing railroad bridge is on the Transportation Improvement Program) . If both Salem and Swampscott desire the same alternative and there is a strong local consensus for such improvements, the feasibility of relocating the road within the next five to ten years would be greatly increased . -60- ' o Highland Avenue/Swampscott Road and Marlborough Road/Traders Way/Highland Avenue Problem: Significant Traffic Demands Between Marlborough Road and Salem/Swampscott Road; Poor Sight Distance and Speeds on Highland Avenue Contribute to Accident Problems ; Difficult to Negotiate Left Turns Between the Two Intersections; New Development Will Aggravate Problems Solution: Close Highland Avenue median at Swampscott Road. Lengthen the left turn lane from northbound Highland Avenue. approaching Marlborough Road . ' Open First Street at Swampscott Road . Provide a double left turn lane from Highland Avenue southbound into Traders Way. Modify the Marlborough Road approach to provide separate right turn, straight, and left turn lanes and one departure lane . A minimum 46 ' ' opening of Marlborough Road would be required to do this . Figure 16 illustrates the recommendations for these two intersections . The City should reserve the right-of-way on the east side of Highland Avenue for an additional. 12-foot exclusive riqht turn lane into Trader's_Way_ should traffic warrant it ' in the the future. ' -61- _ I o 0 wzo Et � � �`✓� �� � -_� tic.`. Zft, jt Wh= ``\ 0 :I �� s• I/ ¢ N �� - .: � \ b r., � 1 •� .• 1 SWAMaSCOTT ` �" U,� • 1 RO ct r: \ •; �-� i „ \ ,,�_� �� _ __ -� - -( ,�,1'' II'` �-- `fel '• • �� L {I i LSF �. 1 1 _ ;moi r••i' itgr '� I,d p 1 h o Canal Street Problem: Congestion During Several Hours of the Day; Growth in Traffic Solution: Provide a four-lane cross-section the entire length of Canal Street between Riley Plaza and Jefferson Avenue. Within the narrowest right-of-way, which appears to be 50-feet wide, this would involve providing a minimum 45 ' (4 11-foot lanes and a ' 1-foot offset) . A 5-foot minimum width sidewalk on the east side of the street is envisioned. In wider right-of-way areas, a 48 ' ' pavement cross-section with four 12-foot lanes should be provided. 1 -63- i Neighborhood Traffic Intrusion Problem: Through Traffic in Neighborhoods Solution: Improve routes which motorists are trying to avoid; test street operation changes; discuss pros and cons with residents who will be affected. ' o Federal Street ' Problem: Through Traffic Intrusion; Residents West of North Street Concerned About traffic using Federal Street to Avoid Congestion at Essex and Summer Streets . Solution: Several Alternatives are available including : 9 1) Make Federal Street one-way southbound between Summer and Beckford Streets . ' 2) Make Federal Street one-way eastbound between Beckford and Monroe Streets ; make Beckford Street one-way northbound between Essex and Federal Streets and leave River Street one-way northbound between Federal and Bridge Streets ; and ' Lynn Street one-way southbound between Bridge Street and Federal Street . 3) Extend the median on Route 114 across ' Federal Street nearly to Lynde Street , traffic crossing North Street could be prohibited while still allowing left ' turns into Federal Street from North Street .. Any of the above proposals (and others ' suggested by local residents) are possible and would reduce through traffic intrusion on Federal Street ; ' those involving only street pattern changes are the least costly and quickest to implement . All will adversely affect the circulation of local residents as well as that of through traffic . 1 -64- ' o Highland and Oakland Streets Problem: Neighbor.:ood Traffic Intrusion (Motorists Who are Avoiding Congestion on Route 114) ; Speeding and Potential Safety Problems Solution: Install stop signs on all four approaches to the intersection. Improving this intersection is also a high priority of the City of Peabody. ' This solution was agreed upon by both cities . 1 1 ' -65- Analyses Appendices Separate appendices to this report provide analyses of 11 the proposed improvements described above and downtown Salem traffic recommendations . The analyses contained in the appendices provide the lane widths which were assumed for the proposed improvements . Queue (or traffic backup) analyses conducted for signalized intersections are also included in the separate appendices. Table 10 summarizes the level of service results with ' proposed intersection improvements at signalized intersections . C. Estimated Costs and Potential Funding Sources ' To help the City establish implementation priorities, the cost associated with the potential improvements is a critical element . The following pages include a very preliminary estimate of the costs associated with the recommended improvement proposals in 1986 constant dollars and the projects listed for early action, short range, and long ' range implementation. Also attached are the potential funding sources for the various elements of the improvement program. ' -66- tl ' TABLE 10 I ' CITY OF SALEM 1991 LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY ' FOR PROPOSED SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS ' AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION DELAY LOS DELAY LOS (sec/veh) (sec/veh) ' Boston St./Essex St. 18 C 25 C Willson St./Jefferson Ave. 12 B 36 D ' (13 B)` Hawthorne Blvd./Derby St. 19 B 16 C Jefferson Ave./Loring Ave./ Canal St. 20 C 23 C ' + With parking removed on Jefferson Avenue as well as on Willson Street. ' SHORT TERM: O-S U . Essex/Fort/Webb WARD COST FUNDING SOURCES ' Four-way stop sign 120 City Restripe pavement markings 1-2 270 390 ' Congress/Derby/Hawthorne 1 Striping 2,800 ' Signal 80,000 Urban Systems One-way street between Derby and Hawthorne Angle parking 2,200 85,000 Boston/Essex 3 ' Remove and relocate monument 25,000 Signal 60,000 Chap. 90 Striping of lanes 2, 100 Urban Systems 87,000 Highland Avenue/Jackson 3 Modify signal 20,000 Add lane for right turn movement 47,000 Urban Systems Pavement markings 2, 100 ' 69,100 Willson/Jefferson 3 Signal 60,000 Striping 2, 100 Urban Systems 62, 100 Loring/Jefferson/Canal 7 ' Geometry Changes 56,000 Signal 60,000 Chap. 90/Federal Aid Primary ' New one way roads (Broadway - B & M right of way) 56,000 Urban Systems 172,000 Highland/Swampscott/ ' Marlborough 3 50,000 PWED Close median Private Linkage ' Urban Systems Highland/Marlborough 3 & 4 50,000 PWED Private Linkage Double left turn lane Urban Systems into Trader's Way from Highland ' SHORT TERM: WARD COST FUNDING SOURCES Highland Street/Oakland 6 Range from City t 200 to 10,000 City of Peabody Neighborhood traffic controls ' Winter Street/Washington Square 2 ' Signal $ 30,000 Urban Systems Federal Street 2 City Neighborhood traffic controls LONG TERM: Improve access to Route 128 3, 4 & 6 ' Boston Street — 1 lane to Peabody, 2 lanes from Peabody (114 East) ' 30,000 North Street — 1 lane Federal Aid Primary from Peabody, 2 lanes Urban Systems to Peabody (114 West) 30,000 60,000 Dead Man's Curve 7 ' Provide Median and 55,000 Federal Aid Primary left turn lane Private linkage Swampcott Road 3 1,200,000 Private linkage ■�'�l ` Highland Avenue to B&M Tracks Chap. 90 Urban Systems Four 12' lanes ' 7 $3,200, 000 Safer Off-System Between Canal Street' Ocean Avenue Bridge —eet and Federal Aid Program Jefferson Avenue Urban Systems State Bridge Replacement Program ' Canal Street 5 & 7 $800, 000 Urban Systems Four 12' lanes Swampscott Road/ 7 $2, 800, 000 Private Linkage Loring Avenue Chap. 90 (design) Connector Road Urban Systems (Construction) ' Signal Left turn lane M19WP OTHER RECOMMENDED TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS IWARD COST FUNDING SOURCES uare One-Way 7 $ 225,000 Private reLinkage venue Urban Systems Zdening and modifications Federal Aid Primary �i ng signal at Paradise/Vinnin Jhue/Harmony Grove Channelization 6 100,000 City Urban Systems Bride at Dead Mans Curve 7 900,000 Private Linkage fill Road T Nscott Road 7 2,800,000 Private Linkage eete RR Urban Systems _ Street (near lead mills) 7 City I! guardrails /Grove Street City -it)orhood traffic controls Jp 1 it ----------- 7:---------------- ------- PA vo �Frrr /fir O RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS RELOCATED SWAMPSCOTT ROAD AND LORING AVENUE Or At r Orr nnn f ' /q 8(O AM PSK Ho"R PSK I7�Wk P ti D)9 j C 62 5 a.L F r Ery 28 g6 —g26 �Bg r P ' 6/y 284 028 ti / a" 381 4g> d go uOl[[[ 4f44( Ott [I[[l1[0 flfW( ,tt .tt`ttt .\ttttt V - f04if(4/ 444/f 1. Qlfft f/Ipfl 66g P 9�` � 24 264� r-590 ,` •�\ r sig i01.� �3a teas ' (OOq( lost, 29`ry, i 1 1 (141b75-6* 1 0 8 ` 90 y ��? 3�I TO 9y` / �0O e 00 4hut '!`r°•pd6♦ neurorr 4ot ♦,'`rO,Od�,r I0I/ 'tIr Iplit rV jIt If fw I' l ItFf 1 1 O�P Iflff I zap J h h 10� d , a n'00 4 O� O 6 q 00 1 C 360 X680 1 / 0. 0 00 `"eo X01 _0 100/� 10 / • >O o 390` m8,0 s <P 60 AZO \�o' 60 11 9 1 .n t rhe ,pS Rrtrrt trrlRr rrtr,R .' O ✓� e, S mt Iffl � +fI i 1 fff 4fle +y dl • •rA /Tf° t' y l� li. '., ' 2 ':�'•F f� �y �'S!.� x�''r34 >� ;f' r3 l?rr��`G rj.�/'f3k'Fi4�.�ti F.r.� rj;"���<r 1r; t�'r h �, g�' A 'r��y, t . <tiSl<(FR 0$f{t e ,� t. r l �.F,`r 'r f t'�n'•wMt H,Ti'r tt.f � ' njr`�5.d tit ��CN F.X•C � n cr r ! {Y. Ft. ?;ti �i r x{,it»� 1.�•.r i>k, f,.r}r""�'�4�; J }i'? �i ,ab�''.Az rui f� it �! r r ,<.t,� et. .f���rr'�. t yt r � .J" , i r.\ r✓ '.}r rf ! N� � tK+}max , G.f. ../ A •. r J! t'„a.� ,•``'r11Y 1 1. 'L!t' s r r tr .t�rtl >)7 .S r f - }� .,� r t: t .r' U/.11' .f V n+ 't,h FE I r,+r kR k,i,ref t f �� r� ✓Z �'�l��`�t'/5� '" � qN`t 1 '7L�`G- "3y X, }}��..t' + 4 j a1 f 1 RR'<4`�ry ,ra r:•t t 'F �' >.k' L dr. r r1, r �,, r .,y i'r''i'•. / c t < o c7i�+} �tYf- I.Y>.+'�i }ar��f7 r''iri:'t „�tz,W e�J `�` Ctsr , ;(y ? 'j��.,'' ' "r+' �• Rh , , �. #., 1 t r, Yp'�x r» jt.G� I t 5 .{i F. a �.�l,F+ftr ^�•a � � r{ri t`"4 ,�,.., ,r r'�'�,Jt��f!-"'t't?,.,+t''Il, -i. Fa'U'".,i^ ,}� /..EriEy 1w`Wl''F°(i�i)ti 'l�i�14`�" t,. n r Ir.rf (r 4 !!f'N 1 Cdr/r3 t ' .15��1'r >„ �� •r rt C �t- p t r +t. +t+{3rl1� � y , i i.�kf, d' �yrl.r,rxsl�j,!>F'{ �rr '`, t`tS}R•lrlr y.+ +�f � .9!>�t.' f x#'�tt'!r'k 3�1�� -!r `*^S>r't{tr��,yi, .f.� 51 'h^ �7 .S. t ja t > .f rLfir i r r 2F•T.k, rt'. .vr (t,�� jN7 1 +. 'r✓.7 � it r h' �^ti ' t y, c. ,}� ;o>-. R• Ik �� i. ,�[ ' �� A�"�,tr r,r4',Gt - /�'qt, xq�' r '��•,?r'�fM,�9t r�1 �?' 'Haq !,) hrR p d(r`'� • r M '' 1T� ,tr p I't[r-�nf"err' �'!f, Cf'tl,y1 � �r't4[�" tt are�� }�rry�i}1 v'^y. t�i}1°�'xtl�ftt�fi,4��i(� �p ,(i'' j•• 4:,� �, � frj• fg }.y �"�r, � ,t�1 ) Lt fir• ' -Nr � ftr :1�;{}✓�y tr rt,kr��t��g ��,,r rf' iy<�y9 y�t{ €�4'rr'f< tt�'Y;xxtr'}t��.."v1{i. ����' � et✓s' � P e .j 1 F' r� !"'tet' s �' �.qr{_, (y r !r'f`F,�, tlktS;/i ^ t �} e i Y TYx -z' ,�n rr'��y a�° x r•F t j` r ori"r "C,'� '''4 d' t JtFhI} f Yt� / 7">>y 'fi�l^ � tt r� � a'. r1. x + x,;U rN�rr•!,C e}t� l , A�e� t t '} >H ` ?. . ,'fit•. Y .� ' �? ' r�r � ,n-:!} /t;,)e`rr, k'��>!1"# j`R.17�� ,S� Flaj,itif � j} . !F/ '{91gti'�f�<�5' u,?� s , � � r Y r<� .t't' ,,y f ^<� r It`' ?r� .C�.,YS(kdJ t•$nn4/y t � � �i'4�,v r�'tt,�s 7 cr'1e�,t+•> � R F ' � e,,t>j�-+ 4 rr.lfl� yr fjJT l' r ffr�� I �1 L.r+tS,.�rl, t , �5 ,!i try✓/ pr C7 .y!!Y' r, } ,e �'/r-� #!i , t J. tffF�e'y� tLrt�,jC#tl,+�'{:'nY(A�e�)1. 'f�.�,p'Fl;�t� �t•'"' L r' � RAs+t T ✓ f +�t r � �k t7. {r , rt � tl`, ,r � '�i'+j' � ,,54a� ,+a^�P FP n: ; r f41 + „ t, � ,• b yl f t 1 A �frT,'y�a4t� ' �l } f Y4 ' } ,t i{ a.r t: '`�'' 1�� ij � f4 ��` 1. ,/,t*"�r� �faF�"�y'�}ta• �ril u j + roi i y r Y v q v ! ' [ �J!'`F.ta7< r.4'• /y� i F� -1 ' F frxf M! i� def/ t �5'S •L )' rt r =,y�nF/� r( � d #. '' V!'}.t't v'"r< t 4 dt r r .xt/•, r/rJ;� r.. -�?c�N��t j��'J} "' r f ?r ;+ , a ri'rY� j7b i + i'�'YC,f, f(ri,r�l y ,• , i �, v r I �>< �i��y'r�i t �t rA?' r Kr r'rl✓r f ion!s�''�f}� '11`t�� �r t} � d•y ,'v�d t „x_ Fa„ I '� .r� + t'/� i`�i1��jyit' "rta' .di•'�.t'Ar.v*17`'7Y1.4".iL J+�.r` {�)' �+At 't .+r.�Gr rt4�f; ' >�' D :i^, 1i, � k� C. r 4t?ii ,t x� ni."TJ'k{'r l}�t+'} f ,,r� •�l v� e i ' �`i Z r f�i.. t . 3+14 S 1,�11i r*yr k'�', fr•� nRt kt �r� f r it 'd.. ."`h � .s1, ,�#��Y'+ '1�.3��c j�°i3?', fr `a.,fv'Fr ,�1/ %Y.`• �1. t F r+(�.`� l3ti�' . ''p}y.r,' .. ! ,e 34} 'rFY'1„Vr _ s' ,tx".E7"ri1"<' t°C t n�;' 1>ri1,r r Rf �•' a{y� p1f;.. 1 v r•«trl, r..3{J' Y}'Ua i b,e 11" 4tit r:��slrfyc"1 Clf t•# , ` 1 1�#i _t 1 1M e(r cryr p.(',tt{7.r'4 ti +rt'4 t 7��'lftt> ' ,��' Y i1�:i+v'> �J, trl".�l�y� 4rtiT'lJ � -r}� ti.'+1'`r�y lc S 1'V'r�`� f*.Yf u,'�Cik �1�Y4H 'y�1'1• .�� •x . + '1`• %*i�i13 r s .7. _ '`r .:r �ts,� r . �. ,e r J F r �r��rM��+-l�l},'�� „ �F s r./^r�{3y' A"`t� ✓1)`4�Y' }.t ]" :i,: .�'h.rL.h,`�µ A• ' f "� 1r .c4'.✓H'C aF dM r;R7- �ru4�("f(.<N,q�r�. /arijf DC�"..� ,gyp'! Y '�.;1�5;. nC I � �i.fi+ �✓'-t r"''rri e4h� rr91> �F .+ j �/#-rtt��'grg++t "#�j'� rc /+^' .• �r tr2�r . y�d,e.$•:y'�'��t{lM� <. !1'{�tis.�+�>�Sr t�r fr• . � k& >�.��:S^� m rt..re/' �.v'r r } v•. r °.A<, , ,�,� f_d.',L'1'! x/f�1�: ,A f �t� 1,r ;gC5.11,r�'�7,�kf•'�tt r2 tlNt/rr5"� �xyy .. / 7 nti•let r ��n w r !,[�l !rY L i� r�r riFY r rr r„;( P�AC✓..t a X 'fC L ,y < ` � �" � .f'r rZ�f><•r,;"` r+, AtA3'Y1' '�"i3) t �if�`P J ,r �� ){nr�t3 �'F r y }r 1�. .}q f (r F• 1 i~L`3�f /haf � f,c i� tf Arr J' lltf 1 f�� Fy'is t J'!" t•.t ,�1m,Nn},. < f E >,.� '�'�,�r�5. •u`'t� � }7'w}'�t.fh,'` ' p'.M t � �kl¢4 I . t '3rd r.C: + �..r �x✓, J'' � r{ r 2�._ � rf �,Se n K tr i .f i MATCH LINE A- 2 ` MATCH LINE A-A SEE HEET MATCH L - 3 / 1 \ / - - SHEET 2 ,00� ��35 / I \ \` _ '' �\ 1 I 1 / / / — � / - SEE --k \ l 1111 01 Of 10 loll IQ4�4 cn jt% Oa)C.4 C)l — 03 3 90 £ �\� / / / 9 \844 ,gCpc , rn / , // /�- - - `\ \\\ i \ /) j\\ `�\ , �/ /, // , / / 8 ell le CID IF I lit Is.rk � / 70 — il I 1/ IN (n �� . '\ a N `; ( �/ //' - - / ' ( ( f / 801 � I j r —= i l � If cp ool oo oe 1 ` W \ \ \ OUT ET 36W. I .P. (3x) 4' �, ' •\ i- \ -�\ I /' \� \ . �_� i -INLET 36 R.C. I40. 6 3 x) '� / / // l I ' S 49'38-33 � E �_• � ,\°� �-'_- - - ' � N � / \ � I / � I �, � � r S 39-15-40 Woll 9 _ - 2-68. 70' OS-fig-b0 =v ,00 95b 3 OZ VV-05 S' ' .. ._- t,Z'681 51 - - � - -- - --_ 6 3 £5 55 S -- ---- ---- --- --- .9 ,00 '005 =8 SWAMIPSC0TT _ -�_ � _ - _ _ \ �_ THE FAFARD COMPANIES A -- 51 D - �/ — ` — — / 3 Z►-F/_z� S - DEC j — -- — c 1 01987 E, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIOE.< r , PLAN OF LAND IN �6 SALEM , MASS . PLAN SCALE: I11 = 401 DATE REV. SUBMITTAL DISTRIBUTION DATE THE FAFARD COMPANIES 290 ELIOT STREET ASHLAND , MASS . 401 20' 0 401 80' 1201 FA 109 0-00- W I of 2 i i PLAN REV. SUBMITTAL DISTRIBUTION DATE PLAN OF LAND IN SALEM , MASS . SCALE : III= 401 DATE : THE WARD COMPANIES 290 ELIOT STREET ASHLAND , MASS. 401 20 0 40 80 1201 F o - . -�, s N i— [-BIRD COMPANIES DEC 1 0197 co NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 16F'�l� 0 M � N 11 W co M c' Z,p� F N to i UJ00 O � I I l i i / '/ / 1 1 1 I ► \ el ool -e — loo N 120 O g2 Cu / \ \ / r r ► \ 1 \ / I I /I 0\ // /�10, � . JJ / I /- - oe 1 W \ I I \ \ \ ► / / \ _ o r O( ( i �\ ' ; 111; /// ///� �/ /1 i —�`- --/ '/ /� ►�/' — _` i� f \ S9 cn fb (0 C40 LIN / / / / / / / 1 \ ` \ / loe //0 6-5797 -I? W Sp O \` // i `- ,r��/ 11 ► ( \ (� -,\ \ \\\ - -- 6 O Dal __--=,� \ � \ // ice r \\ / -- ` \� / — •' , 11`�\\,\� \ \ /—_—i i'' _�� \ cp IV MATCH LINE \\\ \\ / 1\11 11f SEE SHEET `� ��\�\ `\\�• \ /;' �:' \`\� __ - - '/ - �/� ►►�� „— ki� / /'/ -- �'/ _ \\� 1\ \\\�\\ \\;\\\ _ /%/1/ \0lool 01 / / / lo, I \�\\\\`\�='='% ►1%11 �`—\ — _ — • \ % SEE SHE — \ u� - -_ _ \ool / MATCH Ll E qA SEE SHEET I 4 i FAI090-00 -W2 of 2 'ei:w� S ....nr�.t♦- x .. .:..s....R•... :m.., iv..,. ty..`T( \.... ..r.ntn.: .; ...e n. .... �..�_... �. _ ._.. .. .: 3 "V x .. .. h w,. c .. .r. .. .. ... .. .. ._ ..__ ... ._ � ...R>•:..'^RS"'�°:5:'!>'l9nR'S 79.x, r- .. _ tom_ +C .. Y _ ,. Y_I .a. �.t .w .<... .. w.o. _..• w .. .�. .. .. .. .'*Rs7'A° t .. . aN'. Y R Y -,. _si : .._ F-. v � ..ar. a .y .. • s r � s .. .. _ �. r • . .. � ..:.�!!4`'1F;... . �'4UN4'��..-.�.� 'RNA a . 8f K.. T.. Si= .ar ATT', ... .. . .. .. n ..,. ».. n .v t ... r r a. w ...- .. .. _ "'d^'7•Tt.. "�iYa".. t\ i99 '.�., 'i5 T '^t."TY... fitr' w^ ?..; 'K'KSa' F. - v *'Tte. Y_ 'r.t+. .ta.. v�.. n. u- r �.. + -v .w•... 'w a '•'/!- . a^K.K:R..^+.�w+F..7^°TT�h'a�lt -. aTY 7�1...Rnn �w.ap�.. 'T'•�°.' �'RT:'+".. .:..R. Y S"� T. r... -*.. a ,r, ,...r r .» .... ... a r ,+ ...- ... ... ,.. �,,. .... ,•.. ..K x . ... z +ar. nne"� Y ..,.. _:Q TU+T'" _s"�'@' ..Fi°�'� lft r _ . ... T'. T Y-.. s.+5 .. _t. r ,•^s � . 'f r r. .: venw. wcsr v Y ..re v •w '.°"Y �" r 'T� X ... '5.. Y. «. A. .. _ .. .... c�.e. _ .. �.. T. +lr!I:Y. .. -_V. _.. ... .Cr.x . ... a^�ffi•! .. .`^» _ - .,t. �. .: =.fJ"' __. .. !rA..� N.$"' ix«. ., »'^Wt...'R`tAW!T.�.`RF: p-:NY.`fT'Y}•C .r'dF.�Y.T!c.-.'U...R TIh 3.. _ i:Y'•F, r.L:snu•`lN+s./Wam-wlaMc��:M+23Ms`N.. `F.«.:•+wxaF,•_CT•WP's...,f i'I'M _...�'�'N.+'T!A^' ":}�.1�1E i- ..�.r, � t -. . k.M .. 3 J �'S...7P'^YSP•t"1'KC"^..e��Rb.M11lt.'t'"[^..:X" f'_","R2'....r!SY+,v STl+B`:'�..F:#+?ttS..K3^t...�...+T�3AtY•tT. ._ �`1:4T _ ...JC .- .. _._{.•n'F•..::M I� R..Ysw I*`A-:9.1. ... 3*.f_. ..'R'4Ti lR`F'^'�'Pt'!Mb.:a^w e0'A%f'M' .aa[�'�.t�!>J.tR�f�'+i��E`R'Ki.. ..if\'f+'M"A.'X.. 'gVi�!t4f'�^'..RPit6.a.'iR^4'*'xT+rnPe•.!•TT -�s�a'�'"-. b"Ti .4t.__ - f .I•'�+te� 1«"•"i+'!+' -d. N'ti' f�1 n. 2.+PrsK� f /f / XI-i 1 RESOURCE 'AREA PLAN ; ; $ x SALEM BUISINES.S - PlARIK*-� Q,l_ESe � SALEM, MA SCALE : '�" ,- t _ - j ,� 10 30_ THE FAE .� EXIST. MAYNARD PLASTICS BLDG. ARD COMPANIES 290 ELIOT STREET ASHLA�°�0, M.A. 5 G� t S 1)rFF,r- {J C pf,�T 5uT i o $a►5I't�1 HAS BaLEs k EXISTING � �- WETLANDS o X EXISTING WETLANDS TRAILER STORAGE v� i aP i I I DISTRIBUTION CENTER 208,000S ISOLATED FUTURE EXISTING E PANSIQN WETLANDS r 000 SF � 1 I �J I MEZZANINE ABOVE I 104, 000 SF t � i IF 1 1 I I 3 STOR Y OFFICE i 36,300 SF 1 40 LOADING BAYS - - - - -- - _ A , r �^a �� 7,_ - 2. , . t y I • N/F N/F /MGEkf/ 56� W ell- N/F BARNS ROAD TRUST CIT3 Y OF SALE" e v N °39q9911117o N07°23'//"E -+- 275. 75 • aoo` � N 09'56'25"E-� 4D8.s/ /y 04°I3'45"E 256.23 0 0000 0 o` v t Qv �V Q i! ! F o H. rl r - J / t�a—�� sE t'''E � 13 ='+J c iY f✓' i" t� h-t aG.4� w ,-`'y -' • �' •,, -9`r y �N'a{ 'J�•E�!!`�l� SEEZ�✓fG�S •.s' -!vt-� �,,.;fz-T" /+�L,� �' t i hoc. _4 ` RA VEL. WETLANDS 6 . J r i' • 1 ISOLATED WETLANQS �` / ,r r ✓' ` X360 i A lW i WETL ANDS i 1' Y �� 96 RESOURCE MAPPING EX/STING MAYNARD PLASTICS r ----'f SALEM BUSINESS PARK ;- SALEM, NSA _. DATE:8-27-87 SCALE:1'=40' `y THE FAFARD COMPANIES / 290 ELIOT STREET ASHLAND,MA