The URL can be used to link to this page

64-494 - SZETELA LANE - CONSERVATION COMMISSION � Lam. 5u�d,�cs��. CC�� —__ ._ _ _ . �f ,; a� Pl �. r i"Y OF SALEM CONSERVATION COMMISSION February 4, 2010 Attorney John R. Keilty Shallop Landing, LLC 40 Lowell Street Peabody, MA 01960 Re: Order of Conditions—DEP #64-494 Szetela Lane Shallop Landing, Salem Massachusetts Dear Attorney Keilty: Enclosed, please 'find the Order of Conditions for the above referenced project. Following the 10-day appeal period (as of February 18, 2010), this document and the attached Special Conditions must be recorded at the Essex County Registry of Deeds (Shetland Park 45 Congress Street, Suite 4100 Salem, Massachusetts). Once recorded, please return a copy of Page 9 of the Order, which will indicate to the Commission that the document has been recorded. As indicated in the Order, prior to any work commencing: 1. this Order must be recorded, 2. a sign shall be displayed showing DEP File# 64-494 within public view, and 3. contact me at least 48 hours prior to any activity to schedule a pre-construction meeting to review the Order with your hired contractor. If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me 978-619-5685. Sincerely, Carey D ques Conservation Agent/ Staff Planner Enclosures CC: DEP Northeast Regional Office � CI Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands 64-494 . WPA Form 5 — Order of Conditions MassDEP File# -- Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 eDEP Transaction# Salem CityrTown A. General Information Important: Salem When filling 1. From: Conservation Commission out forms on the 2. This issuance is for a. ®Order of Conditions b. ❑ Amended Order of Conditions computer, (check one): use only the tab key to 3. To: Applicant: move your cursor do not use the a. First Name b.Last Name return key. Shallop Landing, LLC c.Organization e 40 Lowell Street d. Mailing Address Peabody MA 01960 e.City/Town f. State g.Zip Code 4. Property Owner(if different from applicant): a. First Name b.Last Name City of Salem c.Organization 93 Washington Street d Mailing Address , Salem MA 01970 e.City/Town L Stale g.Zip Code 5. Project Location: Szetela Lane Salem _ a. Street Address b. City/Town 41 and 42 243 and 3 respectively c.Assessors Map/Plat Number d. Parcel/Lot Number Latitude and Longitude, if known: d m s d m s d.Latitude e. Longitude wpaforvS.doc• rev.12/23109 Page 1 of 12 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands 64-494 ), WPA Form 5 — Order of Conditions MassDEP File# Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 eDEP Transaction# Salem City/Town A. General Information (cont.) 6. Property recorded at the Registry of Deeds for (attach additional information if more than one parcel): Essex a. County - b. Certificate Number(if registered land) 11853 276 c. Book d. Page October 15, 2009 January 14, 2010 February 4, 2010 7. Dates: a. Dale Notice of Intent Filed b.Date Public Hearing Closed C. Date of Issuance 8. Final Approved Plans and Other Documents (attach additional plan or document references as needed): Definitive Subdivision Plan; Existing Conditions Plan, Subdivision Plan, Topographic Plan, Plan & Profile Shallop Lane, Plan & Profile Easements, Details, & Off Site Drainage Plan Eastern Land Survey-_ Christopher Mello b. Prepared By c. Signed and Stamped by December 29, 2009 various J. Final Revision Date e. Scale f.Additional Plan or Document Title g. Date B. Findings t. Findings pursuant to the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act: Following the review of the above-referenced Notice of Intent and based on the information provided in this application and presented at the public hearing, this Commission finds that the areas in which work is proposed is significant to the following interests of the Wetlands Protection Act (the Act). Check all that apply: a. ElPublic Water Supply b. ElLand Containing Shellfish c. El Prevention of Pollution d. ElPrivate Water Supply e. ElFisheries f. El Protection of Wildlife g. •❑ Groundwater Supply h. ® Storm Damage Prevention i. ® Flood Control 2. This Commission hereby finds the project, as proposed, is: (check one of the following boxes) Approved subject to: a. ® the following conditions which are necessary in accordance with the performance standards set forth in the wetlands regulations. This Commission orders that all work shall be performed in accordance with the Notice of Intent referenced above, the following General Conditions, and any other special conditions attached to this Order. To the extent that the following conditions modify or differ from the plans, specifications, or other proposals submitted with the Notice of Intent, these conditions shall control. wpaform5.doc• rev.12/23109 - Page 2 of 12 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands 64-494 WPA Form 5 — Order of Conditions MassDEPFile# Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 eDEP Transaction# Salem Cityrrown B. Findings (cont.) Denied because: b. ❑ the proposed work cannot be conditioned to meet the performance standards set forth in the wetland regulations. Therefore, work on this project may not go forward unless and until a new Notice of Intent is submitted which provides measures which are adequate to protect the interests of the Act, and a final Order of Conditions is issued. A description of the performance standards which the proposed work cannot meet is attached to this Order. c. ❑ the information submitted by the applicant is not sufficient to describe the site, the work, or the effect of the work on the interests identified in the Wetlands Protection Act. Therefore, work on this project may not go forward unless and until a revised Notice of Intent is submitted which provides sufficient information and includes measures which are adequate to protect the Act's interests, and a final Order of Conditions is issued. A description of the specific information which is lacking and why it is necessary is attached to this Order as per 310 CMR 10.05(6)(c). Inland Resource Area Impacts: Check all that apply below. (For Approvals Only) 3. ❑ Buffer Zone Impacts: Shortest distance between limit of project a. linear feet disturbance and Bank or Bordering Vegetated Wetland boundary (if available) Resource Area Proposed Permitted Proposed Permitted Alteration Alteration Replacement Replacement 4. ElBank a.linear feel b.linear feet c.linear feet d.linear feet 5. ❑ Bordering Vegetated Wetland a.square feet b.square feet c.square feet d.square feet s. ❑ Land Under Waterbodies and a.square feet b.square feet c.square feet d.square feet Waterways e. cly dredged f.dy dredged 7. ❑ Bordering Land Subject to Flooding a.square feet b.square feet c.square feet d.square feet Cubic Feet Flood Storage e.cubic feet f.cubic feet g.cubic feet h.cubic feet e. ❑ Isolated Land Subject to Flooding a.square feet b.square feet Cubic Feet Flood Storage c.cubic feet d.cubic feet e. cubic feet f.cubic feet wpalorm5 Aoc- rev.12123/09 Page 3 o112 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: _ Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands 64-494 �~ . \, WPA Form 5 — Order of Conditions MassDEP File# i1\ Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 eDEP Transaction# Salem City/Town r B. Findings (cont.) Resource Area Proposed Permitted Proposed Permitted Alteration Alteration Replacement Replacement 9. ❑ Riverfront Area a.total sq.feet b.total sq.feet Sq ft within 100 ft c.square feet d.square feet e.square feet f.square feet 1 Sq ft between 100- 200 ft g.square feet h.square feel i.square feet j.square feet Coastal Resource Area Impacts: Check all that apply below. (For Approvals Only) 1o. ❑ Designated Port Indicate size under Land Under the Ocean, below Areas 11. ❑ Land Under the Ocean a.square feet b.square feet c.cly dredged d.ay dredged Indicate size under Coastal Beaches and/or Coastal Dunes 12. ❑ Barrier Beaches below 13. El Coastal Beaches cu yd cu yd a.square feet b.square feet c.nourishment d.nourishment 14. ❑ Coastal Dunes cu yd cu yd a.square feet b.square feet c.nourishment d.nourishment 15. ® Coastal Banks a.linear feet b.linear feet 16. ❑ Rocky Intertidal Shoresa.square feel b.square feet 17. ❑ Salt Marshes a.square feet b.square feet c.square feet d.square feet 18. ❑ Land Under Salt Ponds a.square feet b.square feet c.cly dredged d.cly dredged 1g. -❑ Land Containing Shellfish a.square feet b.square feet c.square feet d.square feet 20. ❑ Fish Runs Indicate size under Coastal Banks, Inland Bank, Land Under the Ocean, and/or inland Land Under Waterbodies and Waterways, above a.Gy dredged b.Gy dredged 21. ❑ Land Subject to Coastal Storm a.square feet b.square feet Flowage wpalorm doc• rev.12/23109 Page 4 of 12 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands 64-494 WPA Form 5 — Order of Conditions MassDEP File# Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 eDEP Transaction At Salem Cityrrown B. Findings (cont.) 22. ❑ Restoration/Enhancement: a.square feet of BVW b.square feet of salt marsh 23. ❑ Stream Crossing(s): a.number of new stream crossings b.number of replacement stream crossings C. General Conditions Under Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act The following conditions are only applicable to Approved projects. 1. Failure to comply with all conditions stated herein, and with all related statutes and other regulatory measures, shall be deemed cause to revoke or modify this Order. 2. The Order does not grant any property rights or any exclusive privileges; it does not authorize any injury to private property or invasion of private rights. 3. This Order does not relieve the permittee or any other person of the necessity of complying with all other applicable federal, state, or local statutes, ordinances, bylaws, or regulations. 4. The work authorized hereunder shall be completed within three years from the date of this Order unless either of the following apply: a. the work is a maintenance dredging project as provided for in the Act; or b. the time for completion has been extended to a specified date more than three years, but less than five years, from the date of issuance. If this Order is intended to be valid for more than three years, the extension date and the special circumstances warranting the extended time period are set forth as a special condition in this Order. 5. This Order may be extended by the issuing authority for one or more periods of up to three years each upon application to the issuing authority at least 30 days prior to the expiration date of the Order. 6. If this Order constitutes an Amended Order of Conditions, this Amended Order of Conditions does not extend the issuance date of the original Final Order of Conditions and the Order will expire on unless extended in writing by the Department. 7. Any fill used in connection with this project shall be clean fill. Any fill shall contain no trash, refuse, rubbish, or debris, including but not limited to lumber, bricks, plaster, wire, lath, paper, cardboard, pipe, tires, ashes, refrigerators, motor vehicles, or parts of any of the foregoing. 8. This Order is not final until all administrative appeal periods from this Order have elapsed, or if such an appeal has been taken, until all proceedings before the Department have been completed. wpaform5.doc• rev.12/23109 Page 5 of 12 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands 64-494 WPA Form 5 — Order of Conditions MassDEP File# �\ Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 eDEP Transaction# Salem City/Town C. General Conditions Under Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act (cont.) 9. No work shall be undertaken until the Order has become final and then has been recorded in the Registry of Deeds or the Land Court for the district in which the land is located, within the chain of title of the affected property. In the case of recorded land, the Final Order shall also be noted in the Registry's Grantor Index under the name of the owner of the land upon which the proposed work is to be done. In the case of the registered land, the Final Order shall also be noted on the Land Court Certificate of Title of the owner of the land upon which the proposed work is done. The recording information shall be submitted to the Conservation Commission on the form at the end of this Order, which form must be stamped by the Registry of Deeds, prior to the commencement of work. 10. A sign shall be displayed at the site not less then two square feet or more than three square feet in size bearing the words, "Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection" [or, "MassDEP"] "File Number 64-494 " 11. Where the Department of Environmental Protection is requested to issue a Superseding Order, the Conservation Commission shall be a party to all agency proceedings and hearings before MassDEP. 12. Upon completion of the work described herein, the applicant shall submit a Request for Certificate of Compliance (WPA Form 8A) to the Conservation Commission. 13. The work shall conform to the plans and special conditions referenced in this order. 14. Any change to the plans identified in Condition #12 above shall require the applicant to inquire of the Conservation Commission in writing whether the change is significant enough to require the filing of a new Notice of Intent. 15. The Agent or members of the Conservation Commission and the Department of Environmental Protection shall have the right to enter and inspect the area subject to this Order at reasonable hours to evaluate compliance with the conditions stated in this Order, and may require the submittal of any data deemed necessary by the Conservation Commission or Department for that evaluation. 16. This Order of Conditions shall apply to any successor in interest or successor in control of the property subject to this Order and to any contractor or other person performing work conditioned by this Order. 17. Prior to the start of work, and if the project involves work adjacent to a Bordering Vegetated Wetland, the boundary of the wetland in the vicinity of the proposed work area shall be marked by wooden stakes or flagging. Once in place, the wetland boundary markers shall be maintained until a Certificate of Compliance has been issued by the Conservation Commission. wpaform5 doc• rev.12/23109 Page 6 of 12 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: _ Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands 64-494 WPA Form 5 — Order of Conditions MassDEP File# ) .. Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 eDEP Transaction# Salem Cilyrrown C. General Conditions Under Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act (cont.) 18. All sedimentation barriers shall be maintained in good repair until all disturbed areas have been fully stabilized with vegetation or other means. At no time shall sediments be deposited in a wetland or water body. During construction, the applicant or his/her designee shall inspect the erosion controls on a daily basis and shall remove accumulated sediments as needed. The applicant shall immediately control any erosion problems that occur at the site and shall also immediately notify the Conservation Commission, which reserves the right to require additional erosion and/or damage prevention controls it may deem necessary. Sedimentation barriers shall serve as the limit of work unless another limit of work line has been approved by this Order. NOTICE OF STORMWATER CONTROL AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS 19. The work associated with this Order (the "Project') is (1)® is not(2)❑ subject to the Massachusetts Stormwater Standards. If the work is subject to the Stormwater Standards, then the project is subject to the following conditions: a) All work, including site preparation, land disturbance, construction and redevelopment, shall be implemented in accordance with the construction period pollution prevention and erosion and sedimentation control plan and, if applicable, the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan required by the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System Construction General Permit as required by Stormwater Condition 8. Construction period erosion, sedimentation and pollution control measures and best management practices (BMPs) shall remain in place until the site is fully stabilized. b) No stormwater runoff may be discharged to the post-construction stormwater BMPs unless and until a Registered Professional Engineer provides a Certification that: i. all construction period BMPs have been removed or will be removed by a date certain specified in the Certification. For any construction period BMPs intended to be converted to post construction operation for stormwater attenuation, recharge, and/or treatment, the conversion is allowed by the MassDEP Stormwater Handbook BMP specifications and that the BMP has been properly cleaned or prepared for post construction operation, including removal of all construction period sediment trapped in inlet and outlet control structures; ii. as-built final construction BMP plans are included, signed and stamped by a Registered Professional Engineer, certifying the site is fully stabilized; N. any illicit discharges to the stormwater management system have been removed, as per the requirements of Stormwater Standard 10; iv. all post-construction stormwater BMPs are installed in accordance with the plans (including all planting plans) approved by the issuing authority, and have been inspected to ensure that they are not damaged and that they are in proper working condition; v. any vegetation associated with post-construction BMPs is suitably established to withstand erosion. wpaform5.tloc• rev.12/2]109 - Page 7 of 12 - Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands 64-494 WPA Form 5 - Order of Conditions MassDEP File# Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 eDEP Transaction# Salem City/Town C. General Conditions Under Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act (cont.) c) The landowner is responsible for BMP maintenance until the issuing authority is notified that another party has legally assumed responsibility for BMP maintenance. Prior to requesting a Certificate of Compliance, or Partial Certificate of Compliance, the responsible party(defined in General Condition 18(e)) shall execute and submit to the issuing authority an Operation and Maintenance Compliance Statement ("O&M Statement) for the Stormwater BMPs identifying the party responsible for implementing the stormwater BMP Operation and Maintenance Plan ("O&M Plan")and certifying the following: i.)the O&M Plan is complete and will be implemented upon receipt of the Certificate of Compliance, and ii.) the future responsible parties shall be notified in writing of their ongoing legal responsibility to operate and maintain the stormwater management BMPs and implement the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. d) Post-construction pollution prevention and source control shall be implemented in accordance with the long-term pollution prevention plan section of the approved Stormwater Report and, if applicable, the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan required by the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System Multi-Sector General Permit. e) Unless and until another party accepts responsibility, the landowner, or owner of any drainage easement, assumes responsibility for maintaining each BMP. To overcome this presumption, the landowner of the property must submit to the issuing authority a legally binding agreement of record, acceptable to the issuing authority, evidencing that another entity has accepted responsibility for maintaining the BMP, and that the proposed responsible party shall be treated as a permittee for purposes of implementing the requirements of Conditions 18(f) through 18(k)with respect to that BMP. Any failure of the proposed responsible party to implement the requirements of Conditions 18(f) through 18(k)with respect to that BMP shall be a violation of the Order of Conditions or Certificate of Compliance. In the case of stormwater BMPs that are serving more than one lot, the legally binding agreement shall also identify the lots that will be serviced by the stormwater BMPs. A plan and easement deed that grants the responsible party access to perform the required operation and maintenance must be submitted along with the legally binding agreement. f) The responsible party shall operate and maintain all stormwater BMPs in accordance with the design plans, the O&M Plan, and the requirements of the Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook. wpaform5.tloc• rev.12123/09 Page 8 of 12 l J Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: _ Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands 64-494 WPA Form 5 — Order of Conditions MassDEP File# Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 eDEP Transaction# Salem City/Town C. General Conditions Under Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act (cont.) g) The responsible party shall: 1. Maintain an operation and maintenance log for the last three (3) consecutive calendar years of inspections, repairs, maintenance and/or replacement of the stormwater management system or any part thereof, and disposal (for disposal the log shall indicate the type of material and the disposal location); 2. Make the maintenance log available to MassDEP and the Conservation Commission ("Commission') upon request; and 3. Allow members and agents of the MassDEP and the Commission to enter and inspect the site to evaluate and ensure that the responsible party is in compliance with the requirements for each BMP established in the O&M Plan approved by the issuing authority. h) All sediment or other contaminants removed from stormwater BMPs shall be disposed of in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations. i) Illicit discharges to the stormwater management system as defined in 310 CMR 10.04 are prohibited. j) The stormwater management system approved in the Order of Conditions shall not be changed without the prior written approval of the issuing authority. k) Areas designated as qualifying pervious areas for the purpose of the Low Impact Site Design Credit (as defined in the MassDEP Stormwater Handbook, Volume 3, Chapter 1, Low Impact Development Site Design Credits)shall not be altered without the prior written approval of the issuing authority. 1) Access for maintenance, repair, and/or replacement of BMPs shall not be withheld. Any fencing constructed around stormwater BMPs shall include access gates and shall be at least six inches above grade to allow for wildlife passage. Special Conditions (if you need more space for additional conditions, please attach a text document): see attached document wpalorm5.4oc• rev.12123109 Page 9 or 12 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: _ Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands 64-494 ' DEP File# WPA Form 5 — Order of Conditions Mass Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 eDEP Transaction# Salem City/Town D. Findings Under Municipal Wetlands Bylaw or Ordinance 1. Is a municipal wetlands bylaw or ordinance applicable? ® Yes ❑ No 2.. The hereby finds (check one that applies): Conservation Commission a. ❑ that the proposed work cannot be conditioned to meet the standards set forth in a municipal ordinance or bylaw, specifically: 1. Municipal Ordinance or Bylaw 2.Citation Therefore, work on this project may not go forward unless and until a revised Notice of Intent is submitted which provides measures which are adequate to meet these standards, and a final Order of Conditions is issued. b. ❑ that the following additional conditions are necessary to comply with a municipal ordinance or bylaw: 1. Municipal Ordinance or Bylaw 2.Citation 3. The Commission orders that all work shall be performed in accordance with the following conditions and with the Notice of Intent referenced above. To the extent that the following conditions modify or differ from the plans, specifications, or other proposals submitted with the Notice of Intent, the conditions shall control. The special conditions relating to municipal ordinance or bylaw are as follows (if you need more space for additional conditions, attach a text document): wpaforom5ooc• rev.1223/09 Page 10 of 12 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands 64-494 WPA Form 5 — Order of Conditions MassDEP File# Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 eDEP Transaction# Salem City/Town E. Signatures This Order is valid for three years, unless otherwise specified as a special T2D ZOl D condition pursuant to General Conditions#4,from the date of issuance. t.Date of I suance Please indicate the number of members who will sign this form. (0 6;x This Order must be signed by a majority of the Conservation Commission. 2.Number of Signers The Order must be mailed b certified mail(return receipt requested)or hand delivered to the applicant.A copy also must be ed or nd delivered at the same time to the appropriate Department of Environmental otecti)n Re ional Office, if not filing electronically, and the property owner, if different from applicant. Signatures, i ❑ by hand delivery on by certified mail, return receipt �+ requested,on 1'Q.�rvDJA 4 2010 Date Date F. Appeals The applicant, the owner, any person aggrieved by this Order, any owner of land abutting the land subject to this Order, or any ten residents of the city or town in which such land is located, are hereby notified of their right to request the appropriate MassDEP Regional Office to issue a Superseding Order of Conditions. The request must be made by certified mail or hand delivery to the Department, with the appropriate filing fee and a completed Request of Departmental Action Fee Transmittal Form, as provided in 310 CMR 10.03(7)within ten business days from the date of issuance of this Order. A copy of the request shall at the same time be sent by certified mail or hand delivery to the Conservation Commission and to the applicant, if he/she is not the appellant. Any appellants seeking to appeal the Department's Superseding Order associated with this appeal will be required to demonstrate prior participation in the review of this project. Previous participation in the permit proceeding means the submission of written information to the Conservation Commission prior to the close of the public hearing, requesting a Superseding Order, or providing written information to the Department prior to issuance of a Superseding Order. The request shall state clearly and concisely the objections to the Order which is being appealed and how the Order does not contribute to the protection of the interests identified in the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act(M.G.L. c. 131, § 40), and is inconsistent with the wetlands regulations (310 CMR 10.00). To the extent that the Order is based on a municipal ordinance or bylaw, and not on the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act or regulations, the Department has no appellate jurisdiction. vvpafora .eoc• rev.122109 i Page 11 of 12 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands 64-494 WPA Form 5 — Order of Conditions MassDEP File# \\ Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 eDEP Transaction# Salem City/Town G. Recording Information This Order of Conditions must be recorded in the Registry of Deeds or the Land Court for the district in which the land is located, within the chain of title of the affected property. In the case of recorded land, the Final Order shall also be noted in the Registry's Grantor Index under the name of the owner of the land subject to the Order. In the case of registered land, this Order shall also be noted on the Land Court Certificate of Title of the owner of the land subject to the Order of Conditions. The recording information on this page shall be submitted to the Conservation Commission listed below. Salem Conservation Commission Detach on dotted line, have stamped by the Registry of Deeds and submit to the Conservation Commission. To: Salem Conservation Commission Please be advised that the Order of Conditions for the Project at: Szetela Lane 64-494 Project Location MassDEP File Number Has been recorded at the Registry of Deeds of: County Book Page for: Property Owner and has been noted in the chain of title of the affected property in: Book Page In accordance with the Order of Conditions issued on: Date If recorded land, the instrument number identifying this transaction is: Instrument Number If registered land, the document number identifying this transaction is: Document Number Signature of Applicant wpafcrm5.4oc• rev.12123109 Page 12 of 12 Attachment to Order of Conditions N 64-494 y Page lof 6 SALEM CONSERVATION COMMISSION , DEP FILE #64-494 Szetela Lane Shallop Landing LLC City of Salem, Massachusetts ADDITIONAL FINDINGS Based on the Estimated Habitats or Rare Wildlife and Certified Vernal Pools Map (June 1, 2003) from Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program (NHESP) of the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, it has been determined that this project does not occur near any habitat of state-listed rare wildlife species nor contains any vernal pools. This Order is issued under the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act,M.G.L. Chapter 131, Section 40 and the City of Salem Wetlands Protection Ordinance, Salem Code Chapter 34, Section 34-1 —34-13. This Order permits the installation of a Stormceptor Model STC 1800 in the newly proposed Shallop Lane; to be located to the west of Szetela Lane occupying parcels 2,4, and 17-23 Szetela Lane, 1 and 3 Fort Avenue, 1 rear Fort Avenue and 20 Webb Street. This Order also approves the installation of a new 18 (eighteen) inch storm drain line, connected to the Stormceptor on Shallop Lane, extending down Szetela Lane. The new 18 (eighteen) inch drain pipe will connect with a new and approved 24 inch (twenty-four) inch storm drain that will replace the existing 12 (twelve) inch storm drain. The 24(twenty-four) inch storm drain shall contain a tide gate; design and specs of said tide gate shall be submitted to and approved by the Conservation Commission and the City Engineer. The outfall is approved to discharge into Collins Cove and rip rap shall be placed around the end of the outfall pipe as detailed on the approved plan titled "Definitive Subdivision Plan, The Residences at Shallop Landing, Salem, MA Offsite Drainage Plan"with a final date of December 29,2009. The installed Stormceptor and catch basins on site of the proposed subdivision, Shallop Landing, shall be cleaned per the Operations and Maintenance Platt Proposed Storinwater Management Facilities submitted with the Notice of Intent. GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. This Order of Conditions must be recorded in its entirety (all 6 pages) at the Essex County Registry of Deeds or the Land Court for the district in which the land is located, after the expiration of the 10-day appeal period and within 30 days of the issuance. A copy of the recording information must be submitted to the Salem Conservation Commission before any work approved in this Order commences. 2. Approval of this application does not constitute compliance with any law or regulation other than M.G.L Chapter 131, Section 40, Wetlands Regulations 310 CMR 10.00 and the City of Salem Wetlands Protection Ordinance, Salem Code Chapter 34, Section 34-1 —34-13. 3. All work shalt be performed in accordance with this Order of Conditions and approved site plan(s). No alteration of wetland resource areas or associated buffer zones, other than that approved in this Order, shall occur on this property without prior approval from the Commission. _ Attachment to Order of Conditions # 64-494 Page 2of 6 4. Prior to any work commencing, a sign shall be displayed showing DEP File#64-494, and not placed on a living tree. 5. No work approved in this Order may commence until the ten(10)day appeal period has lapsed from the date of the issuance of this Order. 6. With respect to this Order, the Commission designates the Conservation Agent as its agent with powers to act on its behalf in administering and enforcing this Order. 7. The Commission or its Agent, officers,or employees shall have the right to enter and inspect the property at any time for compliance with the conditions of this Order,the Wetlands Protection Act MGL Chapter 131, Section 40, the Wetlands Regulations 310 CMR 10.00, and shall have the right to require any data or documentation that it deems necessary for that evaluation. 8. The term "Applicant" as used in this Order of Conditions shall refer to the owner, any successor in interest or successor in control of the property referenced in the Notice of intent, supporting documents and this Order of Conditions. The Commission shall be notified in writing within 30 days of all transfers of title of any portion of the property that takes place prior to issuance of the Certificate of Compliance. 9. It is the responsibility of the applicant to procure all other applicable federal, state and local permits and approvals associated with this project. These permits may include but are not necessarily limited to the following: (l) Section 404 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act(P.L. 92-500, 86 stat. 816), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: (2) Water Quality Certification in accordance with the Federal Water Pollution Control under authority of sec. 27(5) of Chapter 21 of the Massachusetts General Laws as codified in 314 CMR 9.00. (3) Sewer Extension Permit from the DEP Division of Water Pollution Control under G. L. Ch. 21A ss7 and 314 CMR 7.00. Any Board of Health permit for septic system design for any portion of the septic system within 100 feet of wetlands shall be submitted to the Commission prior to construction initiation. (4) Design Requirements for Construction in Floodplains under the State Building Code (780 CMR 744.). 10. If there are conflicting conditions within this Order, the stricter condition(s) shall rule. 11. All work shall be performed so as to ensure that there will be no sedimentation into wetlands and surface waters during construction or after completion of the project. 12. The Commission or its Agent shall have the discretion to modify the erosion/siltation control methods and boundary during construction if necessary. 13. The Commission reserves the right to impose additional conditions on portions of this project or this site to mitigate any actual or potential impacts resulting from the work herein permitted. 14. The work shall conform to the following attached plans and special conditions: Attachment to Order of Conditions # 64-494 Page 3of 6 Final Approved Plans Definitive Subdivision Plan The Residences at Shallop Landing, Salem, MA (sheets 1-8) (Title) Final Revisions December 29, 2009 (Dated) Christopher R. Mello (Signed and Stamped by) City of Salem Conservation Commission (On file rvitb) 15. Any proposed changes in the approved plan(s) or any deviation in construction from the approved plan(s) shall require the applicant to file a Notice of Project Change with the Commission. The Notice shall be accompanied by a written inquiry prior to their implementation in the field, as to whether the change(s) is substantial enough to require filing a new Notice of Intent or a request to correct or amend this Order of Conditions. A copy of such request shall at the same time be sent to the Department of Environmental Protection. 16. In conjunction with the sale of this property or any portion thereof before a Certificate of Compliance has been issued, the applicant or current landowner shall submit to the Commission a statement signed by the buyer that he/she is aware of an outstanding Order of Conditions on the property and has received a copy of the Order of Conditions. 17. Condition Numbers 48 and 49 as indicated shall continue in force beyond the Certificate of Compliance, in perpetuity, and shall be referenced to in all future deeds to this property. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION 18. Prior to the commencement of any activity on this site other than activities listed above, there shall be a Pre-Construction Meeting between the project supervisor, the contractor responsible for the work, and a member of the Conservation Commission or its Administrator to ensure that the requirements of the Order of Conditions are understood. The staked erosion control line shall-be adjusted, if necessary, during the pre-construction meeting. Please contact the Conservation Commission Agent at (978) 745-9595 ext 311 at least forty-eight(48)hours prior to any activity to arrange for the pre-construction meeting. 19. Prior to the pre-construction meeting and commencement of any activity on this site, sedimentation and erosion control barriers shall be installed as shown on the approval plan(s)and detail drawings. The Commission and/or its Administrator shall inspect and approve such installation at the pre-construction meeting. 20. No clearing of vegetation, including trees,or disturbance of soil shall occur prior to the pre-construction meeting. Minimal disturbance of shrubs and herbaceous plants shall be allowed prior to the pre- construction meeting if absolutely necessary in order to place erosion control stakes where required. 21. There shall be twenty (20)hay bales and wooden stakes under cover on the site to be used only for emergency erosion control. L Attachment to Order of Conditions k 64-494 Page 4of 6 EROSION CONTROL 22. Appropriate erosion control devices shall be in place prior to the beginning of any phase of construction, and shall be maintained during construction in the wetland areas and buffer zones. The erosion control specifications provided in the Notice of Intent and the erosion control provision in the Order will be the minimum standards for this project; the Commission may require additional measures. 23. All debris, till and excavated material shall be stockpiled a location far enough away from the wetland resource areas to prevent sediment from entering wetland resource areas. 24. Erosion and sedimentation control devices shall be inspected after each storm event and repaired or replaced as necessary. Any accumulated silt adjacent to the barriers shall be removed. 25. The area of construction shall remain in a stable condition at the close of each construction day. 26. Any de-watering of trenches or other excavation required during construction shall be conducted so as to prevent siltation of wetland resource areas. All discharge from de-watering activities shall be filtered through hay bale sediment traps, silt filter bags or other means approved by the Commission or its Administrator. 27. Within thirty(30) days of completion of construction on any given portion of the project, all disturbed . areas in the completed portion of the site shall be permanently stabilized with rapidly growing vegetative cover, using sufficient top soil to assure long-term stabilization of disturbed areas. 28. If soils are to be disturbed for longer that two(2) months, a temporary cover of rye or other grass should be established to prevent erosion and sedimentation. If the season is not appropriate for plant growth, exposed surface shall be stabilized by other appropriate erosion control measures, firmly anchored, to prevent soils from being washed by rain or flooding. DURING CONSTRUCTION 29. A copy of this Order of Conditions and the plan(s)approved in this Order shall be available on site at all times when work is in progress. 30. No alteration or activity shall occur beyond the limit of work as defined by the siltation barriers shown on the approved plan(s). 31. All waste products, grubbed stumps, slash; construction materials, etc. shall be deposited at least 100 feet from wetland resource areas and 200 feet from river. 32. Cement trucks shall not be washed out in any wetland resource or buffer zone area, nor into any drainage system. Any deposit of cement or concrete products into a buffer zone or wetland resource area shall be immediately removed. 33. All exposed sub-soils shall be covered by a minimum of three(3) inches of quality screened loam topsoil prior to seeding and final stabilization. 34. Immediately following drainage structure installation all inlets shall be protected by silt fence,haybale barriers and/or silt bags to filter silt from stormwater before it enters the drainage system. 35. There shall be no pumping of water from wetland resource areas. 36. All equipment shall be inspected regularly for leaks. Any leaking hydraulic lines, cylinders or any other components shall be fixed immediately. Attachment to Order of Conditions # 64-494 + Page 5of 6 37. During construction,all drainage structures shall be inspected regularly and cleaned as necessary. 38. The applicant is herby notified that failure to comply with all requirements herein may result in the issuance of enforcement actions by the Conservation Commission including, but not limited to, civil administrative penalties under M.G.L Chapter 21 A, section 16. AFTER CONSTRUCTION 39. Upon completion of construction and final soil stabilization, the applicant shall submit the following to the Conservation Commission to request a Certificate of Compliance (COC): (1) A Completed Request for a Certificate of Compliance form (WPA Form 8A or other form if required by the Conservation Commission at the time of request). (2) A letter from a Registered Professional Engineer certifying compliance of the property with this Order of Conditions. (3) An "As-Built" plan signed and stamped by a Registered Professional Engineer or Land Surveyor showing post-construction conditions within all areas under the jurisdiction of the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act. This plan shall include at a minimum: (a) All wetland resource area boundaries with associated buffer zones and regulatory setback areas taken from the plan(s)approved in this Order of Conditions; (b) Locations and elevations of all stormwater management conveyances,structures and best management designs, including foundation drains, constructed under this Order within any wetland resource area or buffer zone; (c) Distances from any structures constructed under this Order to wetland resource areas- "structures"include,but are not limited to,all buildings, septic system components,wells, utility lines, fences,retaining walls, and roads/driveways; (d) A line delineating the limit of work-"work" includes any filling, excavating and/or disturbance of soils or vegetation approved under this Order; 40. When issued, the Certificate of Compliance must be recorded at the Essex County Registry of Deeds and a copy of the recording submitted to the Salem Conservation Commission. 41. If the completed work differs from that in the original plans and conditions, the report must specify how the work differs; at which time the applicant shall first request a modification to the Order. Only upon review and approval by the Commission, may the applicant request in writing a Certificate of Compliance as described above. 42. Erosion control devices shall remain in place and property functioning until all exposed soils have been stabilized with final vegetative cover and the Conservation Commission and/or its Administrator has authorized their removal ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS 43. The 24 inch (twenty-four inch) storm drain shall contain a tide gate; design and specs of said tide gate shall be submitted to and approved by the Conservation Commission and the City Engineer. 44. As specified in the approved plans the stormdrain pipes shall be constructed of ductile iron. Attachment to Order of Conditions # 64-494 Page 6of 6 45. A stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) and a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit shall be submitted to the appropriate parties and a copy of these document sent to the Conservation Commission prior to starting construction. 46. A sedimentation boom shall be installed surrounding the outfall pipe work area prior to construction. 47. The applicant agreed to complete embankment stabilization extending 75 (seventy-five) feet on either side of the outfall pipe. Cross section and details of this work shall be submitted to the Conservation Commission and City Engineer prior to constaruction. 48. The installed Stormceptor and catch basins on site of the proposed subdivision, Shallop Landing, shall be cleaned per the Operations and Maintenance Plan Proposed Stortnwater Management Facilities submitted with the Notice of Intent. A visual inspection of the catch basins and manholes shall be completed on an as needed basis to ensure structural integrity. 49. No snow shall be dumped in the resource area or buffer zone to the resource area. s Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy & Environmental Affairs Department of Environmental Protection One Winter Street Boston, MA 02108 617-292-5500 DEVAL L.PATRICK. RICHARD K.SULLIVAN JR. Governor socrCrary ®®®&gyp yy�� i T100THY P.MURRAY ��r - �®e � KENNETH t.-KIMMELL Lieutenant Governor RECEIVED/Dww9V Commix&inner APR 0 5 2011 January 28, 2011 DEPT,OF PLANNING a Attn: LYNN GOONIN DUNCAN AICP COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SALEM CITY OF 120 WASHINGTON ST CITY HALL ANNEX SALEM, MA 019700000 RE: RTN: 3-0020276 Disposal Site Address: SALEM 1 R 3R 3 FORT AVE Notice of Activity and Use Limitation Dear LYNN GOONIN DUNCAN AICP: According to Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP) records, you are the owner of the above-referenced property at which a Notice of Activity` ands Use Limitation (AUL) 'applies: This Tetter is to remind you of your responsibilities as owner of a property with an AOL. These-responsibilities, described below, are established in Massachusetts General Law chapter 21E and the Massachusetts Contingency Plan (310 CMR 40.0000), the state regulation that specifies requirements related to releases of chemicals (oil or hazardous material) to the environment. An AUL is a document recorded at the Registry of Deeds to provide notice to current and future property owners and other interested parties of uses or activities that may not be appropriate at a property where contamination remains in the environment. An AUL provides information about: (1) the nature and location of contamination remaining on a property, (2) the appropriateness of certain uses and activities, and (3) a property owner's obligations to ensure that the requirements of the AUL continue to be met. This information Is available hi alternate format.Call Michelle Waters-Ekanam,.Diversity Director,at 617-292-5751.TDD#1-866-639-7622 or 1-617-574-6868 MassDEPWebsite:vmvrnass.govldeP_ Printed on Recycled Paper 4 i As the owner of a property with an AUL, the Massachusetts Contingency Plan requires that you: . Maintain any obligations and conditions that are specified in the AUL. • If contemplating a change in activities and/or uses that may not be consistent with the requirements of the AUL; hire a Licensed Site Professional to evaluate whether such change would require an amendment or new AUL, or additional cleanup on the property. • If the property is sold or transferred to a new owner, ensure that the AUL is incorporated in full or by reference in the instrument of transfer. Please be aware that at any time, MassDEP may audit any property for which an AUL has been recorded. An audit evaluates whether the AUL has been properly implemented and whether the activities and uses occurring in the area subject to the AUL are consistent with the terms of the AUL. A failure to comply with the terms of an AUL is a failure to comply with the Massachusetts Contingency Plan, and enforcement actions may be initiated against you. The law provides for administrative penalties of up to $25,000 per day for failure to comply with the terms of an AUL. If you are not the current owner of the property listed at the disposal site address above, you may provide MassDEP with updated information by completing the form at http://www.mass.gov/dep/cleanup/approvals/ownadr.htm If you have any questions, please contact MassDEP by email at BWSC.RegulationsCa MassMail.state.ma.us or by telephone at (617) 292-5823. Sincerely, , nine Commerford Assistant Commissioner Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup This information 6 available is alternate format.Call Donald M.Gomes,ADA Coordinator et 617-556-1057.TDDA 1-866-539-7622 or 1-617-574-6868. Page 2 of 2 o Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy &Environmental Affairs Department of Environmental Protection One Winter Street Boston, MA 02108.617-292-5500 DEVAL I PATRICK , �- _. RICHARD K.SULLIVAN JR. So'verncr ._ Secretary "'.MCTHY P MURRAY KENNETH L.KIMMELL Lo arhnSos Gove-nor CommYcsior.er FEB 0 8 2011 Shallop Landing at Collins Cove Partnership, LLC c/o John R.Keilty,Esquire 40 Lowell Street p E `_`_" � 4 E D Peabody, MA 01960 E-3 FEB 10 2011 RE: File No. JD 11-3242, Single Family Homes, Szetela Lane DEPT. OF PLANNING& Collins Cove, Salem COMMUNITY r)7"A-I-0PMENT Dear Mr. Keilty: Enclosed is the Determination of Applicability for the referenced application issued pursuant to Waterways Regulations 310 CMR 9.06. This Determination maybe recorded at the Essex County Registry of Deeds and a copy will be maintained in the Department files. If you have questions,please contact David Slagle in the Waterways Regulation Program at(617) 654-6520. Sincerely, Ben Lynch Program Chief Waterways Regulation Program cc: Salem Conservation Commission This information is available in alternate format.Call Michelle Waters-Ekanem,Diversity Director,at 617-292-5751.TDD#1-666-539-7622 or 1-617-574-6868 MassDEP Website:w .mass.gov/dep Printed on Recycled Paper �\ COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS UluEXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ONE WINTER STREET, BOSTON, MA 02108 617.292-5500 DEVAL L.PATRICK IAN A.BOWLES Governor Secretary TIMOTHY P.MURRAY LAURIE BURT Lieutenant Governor Commissioner WRP File No. JD11-3242 Municipali : Salem Determination of Applicability-310 CMR 9.00 From: Waterways Regulation Program, Issuing Authority To: Shallop Landing at Collins Location of site and Property Owners: Cove Partnership,LLC Szetela Lane/Filled Tidelands 40 Lowell Street Collins Cove, Salem Peabody,MA 01960 Property owners: City of Salem,H&H Propeller Shop Inc. and Heirs of Abraham Livingston Pursuant to 310 CMR 9.06,the Waterways Regulation Program(WRP)has considered your request for a Determination of Applicability and its supporting documentation, and has made the following determination: [X]The Determination is positive: The proposed project consists of the construction of fifteen(15)single family homes on property located off Szetela Lane in the City of Salem. The project site is located on previously filled tidelands of Collins Cove.A portion of the proposed is within a geographic area of jurisdiction under 310 CMR 9.04(2)and therefore will require Ch. 91 authorization.The area of the project site which is within 250 feet of the present high water mark of Collins Cove will require authorization and those areas outside of the 250 foot line are considered landlocked tidelands and will not require Ch. 91 authorization. This Determination does not relieve the applicant from complying with all other applicable federal,state; or local statutes,ordinances,by-laws or regulations. []The Determination is negative:N/A Issued by the Waterways Regulation Program. IN WITNESS WHEREAS, said Department of Environmental Protection have hereunto set their hands this pjtl" day of February in the year two thousand and eleven. Ben Lynch Program Chief Department of Environmental Protection This information is available in alternate format Call Michelle Waters-Ekanem,Diversity Director,at 617-291 TDD#1-866-539-7622 or 1-617-574-6868 MassDEP Website:w vmass.govldep _ Printed on Recycled Paper WW File No. JD11-3242 Page 3 Single family homes, Szetela Lane, Salem NOTICE OF APPEAL RIGHTS: A)Appeal Rights and Time Limits This determination is an action of the Department. If you aggrieved by this action, you may request an adjudicatory hearing. A request for a hearing must be made in writing and postmarked within twenty-one (21)days of the date this determination was issued. B)Contents of Hearing Request Under 310 CMR 1.01(6)(b), the request must state clearly and concisely state the facts which are the grounds for the request, and relief sought. Additionally, the request must state why the determination is not consistent with applicable laws and regulations. In addition, pursuant to 310 CMR 9.17(3), any notice of claim for an adjudicatory hearing'must include. the following information: the WRP File Number; name of the applicant and address of the project; the complete name,address, and telephone number of the party filing the request and, if represented by counsel, the name, address and telephone number of the attorney and, if claiming to be a person aggrieved, the specific facts that demonstrate that the party satisfies the definition of"aggrieved person" found in section 9.02; a clear statement that a formal adjudicatory hearing is being requested; a clear and concise statement of the specific objections to the Department's determination, and the relief sought through the adjudicatory hearing; and a statement that a copy of the re nest has been sent to: the applicant and the municipal official of the city or town where the project is located.The original request and a copy of the check must be sent to: Case Administrator Department of Environmental Protection One Winter Street;2nd Floor Boston, MA 02108 C)Filing Fee and Address The hearing request along with a valid check payable to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in the amount of one hundred dollars($100)must be mailed to: Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection PO Box 4062 Boston,MA 02211 At the same time, pursuant to 310 CMR 9.17, a copy of this appeal shall be sent by certified mail or hand delivery to the applicant, and other parties to this proceeding, if any, and to the municipal official of the city or town where the project is located. The request will be dismissed if the filing fee is not paid, unless the appellant is exempt or granted a waiver as described below. D)Exceptions The filing fee is not required if the appellant is a city or town (or municipal agency), county, or district of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts,or a municipal housing authority. E)Waiver The Department may waive the adjudicatory hearing filing fee for a person who shows that paying the fee will create an undue financial hardship. A person seeking a waiver must file, together with the hearing request as provided above, an affidavit setting forth the facts believed to support the claim of undue financial hardship. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands MasaDEP File Number WPA Form 3 - Notice of Intent • ` Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 Document Transaction Number Salem City/Town Important: When filing out A. General Information forms on the computer, use project sitero 1. Project Location (Note: electronic filers will click on button to locate only the tab key P 1 ): to move your Szetela Lane Salem 01970 cursor-do not a.Street Address use the return b.CityrTown c.Zip Code key. Latitude and Longitude: 42-31-38 70-53-00 d. Latitude e.Longitude Q 41 I Assessors Map/Plat Number g. Parcel/Lot Number F,n 2. Applicant: a.First Name b. Last Name Note: Shallop Landing LLC Before c.Organization completing this 40 Lowell Street form consult your local d.Street Address Conservation Peabody MA 01960 Commission e.Cityrrown f.State g.Zip Code regarding any municipal bylaw or ordinance. h. Phone Number i. Fax Number j.Email Address • 3. Property owner(required if different from applicant): ❑ Check if more than one owner a. First Name b. Last Name City of Salem c.Organization 93 Washington Street d.Street Address Salem MA 01970 e.City/Town f.State g.Zip Code 978-745-9595 h. Phone Number i. Fax Number j. Email address 4. Representative (if any): Attorney John R. Keilty a. First Name - b. Last Name c.Company 40 Lowell Street Peabody MA 01960 e.City/Town f.State g.Zip Code 978-53100 978-531-2479 KeiltyLaw@verizon.net h. Phone Number i.Fax Number j.Email address 5. Total WPA Fee Paid (from NOI Wetland Fee Transmittal Form): • $500.00 237.50 262.50 a.Total Fee Paid b.State Fee Paid c.Cityrrown Fee Paid wpaform3.doc•rev.04/08/09 Page 1 of 8 \ Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: Bureau Of Resource Protection - Wetlands MassDEP File Number WPA Form 3 - Notice of intent Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 SacumentTra action Number Salem City/Town A. General Information (continued) 6. General Project Description: Removal and replacement of existing storm drain on Szetela Lane 7a. Project Type Checklist: 1. ❑ Single Family Home 2. ❑ Residential Subdivision 3. ❑ Limited Project Driveway Crossing 4. ❑ Commercial/Industrial 5. ❑ Dock/Pier 6. ® Utilities 7. ❑ Coastal Engineering Structure 8. ❑ Agriculture (e.g., cranberries, forestry) 9. ❑ Transportation 10. ❑ Other 7b. Is any portion of the proposed activity eligible to be treated as a limited project subject to 310 CMR 10.24 (coastal) or 310 CMR 10.53 (inland)? • 1. ❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe which limited project applies to this project: 2. Limited Project 8. Property recorded at the Registry of Deeds for: Essex, South District a.County b.Certificate#(if registered land) c.Book d. Page Number B. Buffer Zone & Resource Area Impacts (temporary & permanent) 1. ® Buffer Zone Only—Check if the project is located only in the Buffer Zone of a Bordering Vegetated Wetland, Inland Bank, or Coastal Resource Area. 2. ❑ Inland Resource Areas (see 310 CMR 10.54-10.58, if not applicable, go to Section 8.3, Coastal Resource Areas). Check all that apply below. Attach narrative and any supporting documentation describing how the project will meet all performance standards for each of the resource areas altered, including standards requiring consideration of alternative project design or location. For all projects affecting other Resource Area Size of Proposed Alteration Proposed Replacement(if any) Resource Areas, please attach a a. ❑ Bank narrative 1. linear feet 2. linear feet explaining how the resource b. ❑ Bordering Vegetated area was Wetland 1.square feet 2,square feet j&elineated. c. ❑ Land Under 1.square feet 2.square feet Waterbodies and Waterways 3.cubic yards dredged wpaform3.doc•rev.04/08/09 Page 2 of 8 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands MassPEP File Number WPA Form 3 - Notice of Intent Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 Document Trasaction Number Salem Cityrrown B. Buffer Zone & Resource Area Impacts (temporary & permanent) (cont'd) Resource Area Size of Proposed Alteration Proposed Replacement(if any) d. ❑ Bordering Land Subject to Flooding 1.square feet 2.square feet 3.cubic feet of Flood storage lost 4.cubic feet replaced e. ❑ Isolated Land Subject to Flooding 1.square feet 2.cubic feet of flood storage lost 3.cubic feet replaced f. ❑ Riverfront Area 1. Name of Waterway(if available) 2. Width of Riverfront Area (check one): ❑ 25 ft. - Designated Densely Developed Areas only ❑ 100 ft. - New agricultural projects only ❑ 200 ft. -All other projects • 3. Total area of Riverfront Area on the site of the proposed project: square feet 4. Proposed alteration of the Riverfront Area: a.total square feet b.square feet within 100 ft. c.square feet between 100 ft.and 200 ft. s. Has an alternatives analysis been done and is it attached to this NOI? ❑ Yes❑ No 6. Was the lot where the activity is proposed created prior to August 1, 1996? ❑ Yes❑ No 3. ❑ Coastal Resource Areas: (See 310 CMR 10.25-10.35) Check all that apply below. Attach narrative and supporting documentation describing how the project will meet all performance standards for each of the resource areas altered, including standards requiring consideration of alternative project design or location. Online Users: Include your Resource Area Size of Proposed Alteration Proposed Replacement(if any) document transaction number a. E:1Designated Port Areas Indicate size under Land Under the Ocean, below (provided on your receipt b. ❑ Land Under the Ocean page)with all 1.square feet supplementary information you 2.cubic yards dredged submit to the Department. c. ❑ Barrier Beach Indicate size under Coastal Beaches and/or Coastal Dunes below 0 d. ❑ Coastal Beaches 1.square feet 2. cubic yards beach nourishment e. ❑ Coastal Dunes 1.square feet 2.cubic yards dune nourishment wpaform3.doc•rev.04/08/09 Page 3 of 8 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands MassDEP File Number WPA Form 3 - Notice of Intent Document Transaction Number Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 Salem City/Town B. Buffer Zone & Resource Area Impacts (temporary & permanent) (cont'd) Size of Proposed Alteration Proposed Replacement(if any) f. ❑ Coastal Banks 1. linear feet g. ❑ Rocky Intertidal Shores 1.square feet h.❑ Salt Marshes 1,square feet 2.sq ft restoration, rehab.,creation i. ❑ Land Under Salt Ponds 1.square feet 2.cubic yards dredged j. ❑ Land Containing Shellfish 1.square feet k. ❑ Fish Runs Indicate size under Coastal Banks, inland Bank, Land Under the Ocean, and/or inland Land Under Waterbodies and Waterways, above 1.cubic yards dredged • I. ❑ Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage 1.square feet 4. ❑ Restoration/Enhancement If the project is for the purpose of restoring or enhancing a wetland resource area in addition to the square footage that has been entered in Section B.2.b or B.3.h above, please enter the additional amount here. a.square feet of BWV b.square feet of Salt Marsh 5. ❑ Project Involves Stream Crossings a. number of new stream crossings b. number of replacement stream crossings C. Other Applicable Standards and Requirements Streamlined Massachusetts Endangered Species ActlWetlands Protection Act Review 1. Is any portion of the proposed project located in Estimated Habitat of Rare Wildlife as indicated on the most recent Estimated Habitat Map of State-Listed Rare Wetland Wildlife published by the Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program (NHESP)?To view habitat maps, see the Massachusetts Natural Heritage Atlas or go to http://www.mass,gov/dfwele/dfw/nhesl)/regulatory review/priority habitat/online viewer htm. a. ❑ Yes Z No If yes, include proof of mailing or hand delivery of NOI to: Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program • Division of Fisheries and Wildlife October, 2006 Route 135, North Drive b. Date of map Westborough, MA 01581 wpaform3.doc•rev.04/08/09 Page 4 of 8 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided,by MassDEP: Bureau Of Resource Protection - Wetlands `MassDEP File Number • WPA Form 3 - Notice of Intent Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 Document Sransaction Number Salem Cityrrown C. Other Applicable Standards and Requirements (cont'd) If yes, the project is also subject to Massachusetts Endangered Species Act(MESA) review(321 CMR 10.18). To qualify for a streamlined, 30-day, MESA/Wetlands Protection Act review, please complete Section CA.C, and include requested materials with this Notice of Intent (NOI); OR complete Section CAA, if applicable. If MESA supplemental information is not included with the NOI, by completing Section 1 of this form, the NHESP will require a separate MESA filing which may take up to 90 days to review(unless noted exceptions in Section 2 apply, see below). 1. c. Submit Supplemental Information for Endangered Species Review' 1. ❑ Percentage/acreage of property to be altered: - (a)within wetland Resource Area percentage/acreage (b) outside Resource Area percentage/acreage 2. ❑ Assessor's Map or right-of-way plan of site 3. ❑ Project plans for entire project site, including wetland resource areas and areas outside of wetlands jurisdiction, showing existing and proposed conditions, existing and proposed tree/vegetation clearing line, and clearly demarcated limits of work**** • (a)[IProject description (including description of impacts outside of wetland resource area & buffer zone) (b) ❑ Photographs representative of the site (c)❑ MESA filing fee (fee information available at: http://www.mass.gov/dfwele/dfw/nheso/regulatory review/mesa/mesa fee schedule htm). Make check payable to "Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Fund"and mail to NHESP at above address Projects altering 10 or more acres of land, also submit (d)❑ Vegetation cover type map of site (e)❑ Project plans showing Priority & Estimated Habitat boundaries d. OR Check One of the Following 1.❑ Project is exempt from MESA review. Attach applicant letter indicating which MESA exemption applies. (See 321 CMR 10.14. http://www.mass.gov/dfwele/dfw/nhesp/regulatory review/mesa/mesa exemptions htm; the NOI to must still be sent to NHESP if the project is within estimated habitat pursuant 310 CMR 10.37 and 10.59.) 2.❑ Separate MESA review ongoing. a. NHESP Tracking# b. Date submitted to NHESP Some projects not in Estimated Habitat may be located in Priority Habitat,and require NHESP review(see http:/Avww.mass.gov/dfwele/dfw/nhespinhesp.htm, regulatory review tab). Priority Habitat includes habitat for state-listed plants and strictly upland species not protected by the Wetlands Protection Act. '* MESA projects may not be segmented (321 CMR 10.16).The applicant must disclose full development plans even if such plans are not required as part of the Notice of Intent process. wpaform3.doc•rev.04/08/09 Page 5 of 8 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands ^;MassDEP File Number • WPA Form 3 - Notice of Intent _.Document Transaction Number Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 Salem City/Town C. Other Applicable Standards and Requirements (cont'd) 3. ❑ Separate MESA review completed. Include copy of NHESP "no Take" determination or valid Conservation & Management Permit with approved plan. 2. For coastal projects only, is any portion of the proposed project located below the mean high water line or in a fish run? a. ❑ Not applicable—project is in inland resource area only b. ❑ Yes ® No If yes, include proof of mailing or hand delivery of NO[ to either: South Shore-Cohasset to Rhode North Shore-Hull to New Hampshire: Island, and the Cape & Islands: Division of Marine Fisheries- Division of Marine Fisheries- North Shore Office Southeast Marine Fisheries Station Attn: Environmental Reviewer Attn: Environmental Reviewer 30 Emerson Avenue 838 South Rodney French Blvd. Gloucester, MA 01930 New Bedford, MA 02744 Also if yes, the project may require a Chapter 91 license. For coastal towns in the Northeast Region, . please contact MassDEP's Boston Office. For coastal towns in the Southeast Region, please contact MassDEP's Southeast Regional Office. 3. Is any portion of the proposed project within an Area of Critical Environmental Concern (ACEC)? Online users: a. El Yes ® No If yes, provide name of ACEC (see instructions to WPA Form 3 or MassDEP Include your Website for ACEC locations). Note: electronic filers click on Website. document transaction b.ACEC number (provided on 4. Is any portion of the proposed project within an area designated as an Outstanding Resource Water your receipt (ORW) as designated in the Massachusetts Surface Water Quality Standards, 314 CMR 4.00? page)with all supplementary a. ❑ Yes ® No information you submit to the 5. Is any portion of the site subject to a Wetlands Restriction Order under the Inland Wetlands Department. Restriction Act(M.G.L. c. 131, §40A) or the Coastal Wetlands Restriction Act(M.G.L. c. 130, § 105)? a. ❑ Yes ® No 6. Is this project subject to provisions of the MassDEP Stormwater Management Standards? a. ® Yes. Attach a copy of the Stormwater Report as required by the Stormwater Management Standards per 310 CMR 10.05(6)(k)-(q) and check if: 1.❑ Applying for Low Impact Development(LID) site design credits (as described in Stormwater Management Handbook Vol. 2, Chapter 3) 2. ❑ A portion of the site constitutes redevelopment . 3. ® Proprietary BMPs are included in the Stormwater Management System. b.❑ No. Check why the project is exempt: 1.❑ Single-family house wpaform3.doc•rev.04/08/09 Page 6 of 8 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands MassDEP File Number • WPA Form 3 — Notice Of Intent Document7ransaction Number Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 Salem Ll m City/Town C. Other Applicable Standards and Requirements (cont'd) 2.❑ Emergency road repair 3.❑ Small Residential Subdivision (less than or equal to 4 single-family houses or less than or equal to 4 units in multi-family housing project) with no discharge to Critical Areas. D. Additional Information Applicants must include the following with this Notice of Intent(NOI). See instructions for details. Online Users: Attach the document transaction number(provided on your receipt page) for any of the following information you submit to the Department. t. ® USGS or other map of the area (along with a narrative description, if necessary) containing sufficient information for the Conservation Commission and the Department to locate the site. (Electronic filers may omit this item.) 2. 0 Plans identifying the location of proposed activities(including activities proposed to serve as a Bordering Vegetated Wetland [BVWj replication area or other mitigating measure) relative to the boundaries of each affected resource area. 3. ® Identify the method for BVW and other resource area boundary delineations (MassDEP BVW • Field Data Form(s), Determination of Applicability, Order of Resource Area Delineation, etc.), and attach documentation of the methodology. 4. ❑ List the titles and dates for all plans and other materials submitted with this NOI. Definitive Subdivisiion Plan, The Residences at Shallop Landing a.Plan Title Eastern Land Survey Associates Inc. Christopher R. Mello, P.L.S. b.Prepared By Clayton A Morin P.E. October 9, 2009 1 = 20 d.Final Revision Date e. Scale Stormwater Management Report October, 2009 g. Date f.Additional Plan or Document TRIe 5. ❑ If there is more than one property owner, please attach a list of these property owners not listed on this form. s.❑ Attach proof of mailing for Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program, if needed. 7. ❑ Attach proof of mailing for Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries, if needed. 8. 2 AttachNOI Wetland Fee Transmittal Form 9. ® Attach Stormwater Report, if needed. • Page 7 of 8 wpaform3.doc•rev.04/08/09 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by.MassDEP Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands MassDEP File Number WPA Form 3 - Notice of Intent Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 SaalemlemntTransacionNunber S City/Town E. Fees t. ❑ Fee Exempt: No fling fee shall be assessed for projects of any city, town, county, or district of the Commonwealth, federally recognized Indian tribe housing authority, municipal housing authority, or the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. Applicants must submit the following information (in addition to pages 1 and 2 of the NOI Wetland Fee Transmittal Form)to confirm fee payment: .�/�� 2.Municipat2hecck Number 3.Check date 4.State C eck Number 5.Check date � 6. Payor nam c ck: First Name 1.Payor name on check:4st.Name F. Signatures and.Submittal Requirements I hereby certify under the penalties of perjury that the foregoing Notice of Intent and accompanying plans, documents, and supporting data are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the Conservation Commission will place notification of this Notice in a local newspaper at the expense of the applicant in accordance with the wetlands regulations, 310 CMR 10.05(5)(a). I further certify under penalties of perjury that all abutters were notified of this application, pursuant to the j • requirements of M.G.L. c. 131, §40. Notice must be made by Certificate of Mailing or in writing by hand t delivery or certified mail (return receipt requested) to all abutters within 100 feet of the property line of the project loca ' n. I. t r f pica 2.Date .Sign e o Pr a if different) 4. Date . Si ture of pr ntativ (if any) 6.Date —� For Conse ation Commission: Two copies of the completed Notice of Intent(Form 3), including*supporting plans and documents, two copies of the NOI Wetland Fee Transmittal Form, and the city/town fee payment, to the Conservation Commission by certified mail or hand delivery. For MassDEP: One copy of the completed Notice of Intent(Form 3), including supporting plans and documents, one copy of the NOI Wetland Fee Transmittal Form, and a copy of the state fee payment to the MassDEP Regional Office (see Instructions) by certified mail or hand delivery. Other: If the applicant has checked the "yes" box in any part of Section C, Item 3, above, refer to that section and the Instructions for additional submittal requirements. The original and copies must be sent simultaneously. Failure by the applicant to send copies in a . timely manner may result in dismissal of the Notice of Intent. i wpaform3.doc•rev. 04/08/09 Page 8 of 8 JOHN R. KEILTY, ESQUIRE 511139 Clients Trust Account 40 LOWELL STREET t�I p O PEABODY, MASSACHUSETTS 01960 I V 27 PA 1 A T =ZZ 1017' LLARS _ .. ..__DATE- I TOTHEORDER.O .. GROSSAMT. ___ __ .. -DESCRIPTION- -..._.__._. . .__NET-AMOUNT, Lb i Q 1 CSTJ o(l/Eastern Bank -Lynn, MA u200 20 2 7u1 1:0 1 1 30 1 7981: 40 13 244 11° AMOUNT Ilei JOHN R. KEILTY, ESQUIRE DATE INVOICE 53-179 Clients Trust Account 13 40 LOWELL STREET p0 PEABODY, MASSACHUSETTS 01960 28 PAMOUNT DOLLARS ATE .. .. TO THEO DER.OE_ _.GROSS.AML- - _ .. _._ DESCRIPTION- --,NELAMOUNT W j 0 Eastern Bank -Lynn, MA II.00 20 28uv 1:0 1 130 1 7980: L,0 13 2L. 1 311' • Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands NOI Wetland Fee Transmittal Form Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 Important: A. Applicant Information When filling out forms on the 1. Applicant: computer, use only the tab key to move your a.First Name b. Last Name cursor-do not use the return Shallop Landing7 LLC key. c.Organization 40 Lowell Street � d. Mailing Address Peabody MA 01960 e.City/Town f.State g.Zip Code rzNn In. Phone Number i.Fax Number I. Email Address 2. Property Owner(if different): a. First Name b. Last Name City of Salem c.Organization 93 Washington Street d.Mailing Address • Salem MA 01970 e.Chyrrown f.State g.Zip Code 978-745-9595 h. Phone Number i.Fax Number j.Email Address 3. Project Location: Szetela Lane Salem a.Street Address b.City/Town To calculate B. Fees filing fees, refer to the category The fee should be calculated using the following six-step process and worksheet. Please see fee list and 9 9 P examples in the Instructions before filling out worksheet. instructions for filling out WPA Form 3(Notice of Step 1/Type of Activity: Describe each type of activity that will occur in wetland resource area and Intent). buffer zone. Step 2/Number of Activities: Identify the number of each type of activity. Step 3/Individual Activity Fee: Identify each activity fee from the six project categories listed in the instructions. Step 4/Subtotal Activity Fee: Multiply the number of activities (identified in Step 2)times the fee per category (identified in Step 3)to reach a subtotal fee amount. Note: If any of these activities are in a Riverfront Area in addition to another Resource Area or the Buffer Zone, the fee per activity should be multiplied by 1.5 and then added to the subtotal amount. • Step Sfrotal Project Fee: Determine the total project fee by adding the subtotal amounts from Step 4. Step 6/Fee Payments: To calculate the state share of the fee, divide the total fee in half and subtract $12.50. To calculate the city/town share of the fee, divide the total fee in half and add $12.50. Weaform1doc•Wetland Fee Transmittal Farm•rev.2121108 Page 1&2 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands NOI Wetland Fee Transmittal Form Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 B. Fees (continued) Step 1/Type of Activity Step 2/Number Step Step 4/Subtotal Activity of Activities 3/individual Fee Activity Fee Category 29 - Replace 1 500.00 500.00 Storm Drain Discharge • Step 5/Total Project Fee: 500.00 Step 6/Fee Payments: Total Project Fee: 500.00 a.Total Fee from Step 5 State share of filing Fee: 237.50 b. 1/2 Total Fee less$12.50 Cit /Town share of fillingF262.50 City/Town c. 1/2 Total Fee plus$12.50 C. Submittal Requirements a.) Complete pages 1 and 2 and send with a check or money order for the state share of the fee, payable to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Department of Environmental Protection Box 4062 Boston, MA 02211 b.) To the Conservation Commission: Send the Notice of Intent or Abbreviated Notice of Intent; a copy of this form; and the city/town fee payment. To MassDEP Regional Office(see Instructions): Send a copy of the Notice of Intent or Abbreviated Notice of Intent;a copy of this form;and a copy of the state fee payment. (E-filers of Notices of Intent may submit these electronically.) Wpaform3.doc•Wetland Fee Transmittal Farm•rev.M1108 Page 2 of 2 v i s � i '�'V ,T.,�Tyie l'i a° > +v-a� 'J>•Mya a, v f�U7 J�. q .. g �C do/f4t fl A+ A.?a 1&F tM '!5P p �V�Kfc � + _ �w 6d��3 q� "•�' �yr 1tJ s1�$' y ri y d4Y�►' "�w'ip'p '�q S. FT '.Y�?><4r -4. 1 �F �`�F{�3,��'a 0S&yq r^��y��r+�� r�`G�.•`yv Ty"^i�,o-xi p,aa>� t J� e. � S+'n.� :ffi � E Y ' ":'° '; .. ��$r2t`, .✓yr� �'�fhs' x` r". p`� ' �k?`e''�w�, r �.. `os` Kk "' .', . �✓ tiydv".'� +t 'S: ��v..a h,.a x"�ax f�d�Sr`+�4uz}r ��i}J n*��i' `k:. n"'t� d8ar'�'t�+avy ,� ",' +# �,'k � 2� ' d i�`S{�¢' rti a,svyt�8 r1dT '80 +u�m; kiM�'� Car, R "^dJ 4m. tj>Gra.<`�ia�4 _: i Azi-, ..-r may. 5 v,4 .d'C u�w4�✓�" ' �$ ,^ r m4 t fk' -� .w z rn -r�'• �'�` fi re�huiAt)_s+^r 5<w3sn+,+p,n+�yY"}�+aJ�iu-'-4Mr:'nAr/a{,re✓�"e,.r1n'r7 rr^ ��} e.qp;M', xfq�aT Rx 'I"M1_ 4t a'�r"5Ar 3'�,wa�,a 5cw ar4nG�'✓{S}�'��'z�?:,1'S�i�1�.a<crua>�`T3sr�w"�fk,�e��'4.'3�f�d!T vwx�r'LE...t.D.C�omri�'+ri,�^."�a�t<`M;1 lR�ds""`�e`^t''��4ki`r�J„G";l�xti.��"er�F*tvfr.Y'Xr�s^=.,.>�r.,�•1'AHk,-i fa4Y�'r Rnyff+5 w�"txv s"3rX(''�+'�Y4rW�st,�i�sC"h,anly� irsF, r>x':.✓n oo�fq 7� 2 .. c✓t `ts{a ��;�, r rP asa �4,d� aa tk 1 rr f++ �9 .a�•*' ^ t�`c3:k'iie �� !\ lY yy Xv+k µ�ryf / wtin-�nr`5f p r k7„i Mmirf4ar,Y �r9n7¢§x,y^` h{n�k.'h� 1kuVIVra.A,y,+r2 ¢,aµ t Fla xprq�<x ✓ '," sau w.x.,.w ysf&f. i r a- 'wr gSf:r �t e f � drj 'r�J'y� P3 �vmrr ar6'�j1a�`� �4\�i d+ l '�2L5'� t'' `+�+ ny`v°''r� r@/ t ygt, o''F'z t t•`N,'..i#`t .:7` �• ' i 1 �/:l� ��"'�w�5 r ( b' � 5!`�ii' ��i Yt'�11"Axcaf M1^'�Se k. �a M� �',f le�s<Y^. '" n • "YSt. � �4: `fit' 3�tr.� cr�k�i""�1��S y7v xe'�n;l x.Ls+� G T iii Mit � ° ifs r� T; '�``s3gr>f1xhS��f ,,yy4 r% s+;y' r .a^.� a .� ♦ �'L { ��+.+rt}ar 'r rhe �S x 4<k '�s. ii+u fipfififu+ �a g'a 4»l1 WC `Yu S'" rt U y+• ' r I:I '31C� w"I T ,r 11e ��,, z `"�w. v"n.at ^ n w• ,5+,,, ytsr,e'� 'hL k, ' "�-0t �. � �' �' i• 1 t'1 E 1$�� t0 .`R wR tw5 o°d��: �,+ x `:` �3J i � [�"�'e.1 aTv",,,,�fit' z ty'M t`.uF�rw n✓ St, Q r � &IU�A't2 4 ��CS�n">a SS r��; �Fj;+'Tt� Qhd7t?' fJhf t er' � .tr,s��S y ,+r s�t� �z}X°�K 4✓A r��t _ �:►,.- � Jf FC`Y'" r`tI(�A4 C�7` r� f° E f'k� C4�, 1 .a�. ra�"��.rakf+,`�`s�F'az'�r 4�`�'�'�4 S�,Tn �,+.��r^a,..,,�Y�u�av%y�,r r; A. yam" ,{{ �y*�w. //a ,/( �,or a. �y, la �i'a� a. �,Y'Fv+v�.�f p�.v n �d9�'"w 4 ' < •� �� v r:tr' � ti • Professional Land Surveyors & Civil Engineers ESSEX SURVEY SERVICE 1958 - 1986 OSBORN PALMER 1911 - 1970 BRADFORD &WEED 1885- 1972 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE RESIDENCES AT SHALLOP LANDING SALEM, MA • OCTOBER 2009 104 LOWELL STREET PEABODY, MASS. 01960 TELEPHONE: 978-531-8121 FAX: 978-531-5920 • NATURAL ENVIRONMENT Air The major potential source of dust will be during construction of site utilities, parking, driveways and landscaped areas. Wetting with water will be the primary method used to control dust generation. The site is located immediately adjacent to existing residences and open space areas. Prevailing winds are from the southwest into the northeast. Land The site of the Residences at Shallop Landing consists of 2.1 acres of vacant land which was formerly developed as industrial land and as a portion of the right of way of The Boston and Maine Railroad. The site is bounded to the North by Szetela Lane, to the east by land of the Salem Housing Authority (Lee Fort Terrace), to the south by Fort Avenue and to the west by sundry residential properties. A parcel of 0.19 acres is to be conveyed to H & H Propeller for a parking lot. Existing elevations range from 6.9 to 11.5 feet above mean sea level. Thesite.is thea subject_of an_Activity;and Use Liinitation7No percolation tests:were taken on site since, • wastewater will be discharged-to the municipal system of the City of Salem.) The entire site will be altered by the proposed development of which are single family homes, driveways, landscaping and an access road. Existing and proposed grading patterns are shown on Sheet 2 and 4 of the Site Plan. The site is outside of the 100 foot buffer-zone associated_with the mean hi&water mark of Collins Cove The site is* located with-a FEMA Zone Bas_ evidenced by FIRM 250102 0001B;dated August 5;-» V T-9857_* \� Table 1 Site Coverage Characteristics i Coverage Tyne Existing 'Proposed Buildings -0- 25,440 sf Driveways &Roadways -0- 20,475 sf Walks -0- 3,050 sf Open Space 93,655 44,690 sf • • The relationship of the site to various community facilities is as follows: MBTA Station, Bridge Street 0.9 miles Downtown Salem 0.7 miles Shopping Facilities on Highland Avenue 2.8 miles Bentley School 0.2 miles Collins Middle School 1.5 miles Salem High School 2.3 miles Irzyk Park 0.1 miles Beattle Park 0.1 miles Water and Wetlands �° Collins Cove, a tidal inlet, is located on the opposite (northwest) side of Szetela Lane J� from the site of the proposed residences. The site is located in a FEMA Flood Zone B. Not.wetland_resource-areas are-located on or within 100 feet-of the project boundaries.-3 Erosion control will be practiced in accordance with the plan outlined on Sheet 7 of the D Site Plan and the NPDES SWPPP. In-general,erosion control,barriers will-be maintained at the limit of work ori site;around soil stockpiles and at the limit of work,for-offsite+ storm'drainage construction? Silt barriers will consist of staked hay bales, backed with Uy�91 WX • filter fabric and/or silt socks. If a temporary sediment basin is needed, its location will be \10 determined in the field. Catch basins will be protected with hay bale silt barriers or silt sacks. Site drainage will be accomplished by collection of runoff into a series of piped manholes and catch basins. Outflow from the system will,be directed-to,Collins=Cove-by means of- new 48-in'chd 24:McI diMetei drains on"Szetela'L'ane as depicted on'Sheet-6 othe> Plan!An-appropriately sized propriefar�water`quality device(Stormceptor)will be' —utilized`in conjunction=with-the deep sump hooded catch basins to provide a total- ,suspended removal-rate of greater-than 80 percentr Since Collins Cove is subject to coastal storm flowage, no on-site detention is proposed. Computations for predevelopment and postdevelopment runoff rates are provided within the Stormwater Management Report. No infiltration is-proposed-due to the ATU.Ln and nature of existing soils on the site. An Operation and Maintenance Plan for.the-various components-of the.Stormwater.System is included in the_Stormwater Mzffa_gementrReport.. No known endangered specie habitats are indicated within the project area on the October 1, 2006 Massachusetts Natural Heritage Atlas. The provision of a DEP compliant Stormwater Management System will prevent any • degradation of water quality in Collins Cove as a result of proposed development of the site. • Energy Increased electric and gas energy will be required for Shallop Landing. Natural gas will be brought into the site as to be designed b National Grid and will be used for heating, g gn Y trn g, cooling and clothes drying appliances. Electric energy will be brought into the site as to be designed by National Grid and distributed to each dwelling. That system will be installed in underground conduit. Noise Ambient daytime noise levels will increase during site preparation and construction. Working days and hours will be limited to those specified within the ordinances of the City of Salem. In the long term, the residential proposal would result in slight increases in noise due to increased automobile activity to and from the site and the presence.of new residents. Local Flora and Fauna Due to the urban nature of the site and surrounding areas, wildlife is limited to small mammals and songbirds. Those species utilizing the site as habitat or cover will be displaced during construction but will tend to return following site construction activities. • There are areas of existing trees on site, especially along its eastern boundary. New landscape areas on site in the proposed condition will occupy some 44,690 square feet or 48.9 percent of the site. Traffic Facilities Lots 11-13 will be accessed from Szetela Lane. Lots 4-10 will access Szetela Lane by way of Shallop Lane. Lots 14 and 15 will be accessed from Fort Avenue. Each dwelling will have a two car garage and two driveway parking spaces. The proposed dwellings will add an anticipated 20 vehicle trip per day to Fort Avenue and 130 vehicle trips per day to Szetela Lane. Electric Power The anticipated electric demand for Riverview Place will be 10,000— 12,000 KWH per month. The source of that power will be National Grid. On site electrical facilities will be built underground. Gas Shallop Landing will utilize natural gas for heating, cooking and clothes drying. The • anticipated demand will be 10,000 therms per year. The source of natural gas will be National Grid from existing mains on Flint and/or Mason Streets. i MAN MADE ENVIRONMENT Land Use The project conforms with the growth plans for the area and the city in general as evidenced by its allowed use in the R2 Zoning District and variances granted by the Salem Zoning Board of Appeals. As to dimensional requirements and density. Land uses to the east, south and west of the site are residential. Land use to the north of the site is open space. Beattle Park and Irzyk Park are located within 500 feet of the site. No public or common recreational areas exist within Shallop Landing nor are any proposed. Density The Residences at Shallop Landing are proposed to consist of fifteen single family dwellings on lots ranging from 4,331 to 7,581 square feet in area. The dwellings on Lots i 14 and 15 will have ground coverage of approximately 1,040 squate feet and those on Lots 1-13 a ground coverage of 1,800 square feet. All homes will have a two car garage and three bedrooms. Proposed site coverages are as follows: Buildings 0.58 acres or 27.8 percent Roadways, Driveways 0.47 acres or 20 percent Walks 0.07 acres or 3.3 percent Landscaped Open Space 1.03 acres or 48.9 percent Zoning The existing zoning designation of the site is R-2. Uses abutting the site are a mix of single and multi-family residential. Property to the north of the site along Collins Cove is open space. • COMMUNITY SERVICES Schools It would be anticipated that an average of one school aged child per house or 15 students would be added to the school system if all residents of Shallop Landing were new to Salem. Recreation No recreation areas exist within the property within which Shallop'Landing is to be built. Both Irzyk Park and Beattie Park are within 10 minutes walk of the site. Police The total population of Shallop Landing is estimated to be 40 to 60 persons. If each unit generated 2 automobiles, 30 cars would be present on the site. Fire • Fifteen dwellings are proposed to be constructed on the site of Shallop Landing. The dwellings will be of two story construction. The source of water will be City of Salem municipal supply. A new eight inch water main will be constructed from Fort Avenue into the site. Two fire hydrants are proposed. Available fire flow volumes will be discussed with the City or determined by flow testing if no record data is available. Public Works No public roadway will be constructed within Shallop Landing. -Maintenance-and_snow removakwll be=done=privatel-y. `New water-and-sewer,connectionswill,be,built from existing facilitiesinto-the site:+Existing connections,-if-any, will-be-cut and capped-in- accordance with the requirements of the Salem-Department of Public-WOrks. On site sewer, water and storm drainage facilities will be privately maintained. PUBLIC FACILITIES Water Supply, Flow Pressure and Distribution The source of water for Riverview Place is to be from the City of Salem municipal supply. Consumptive demand for the 15 dwellings is projected to be 4,950 gallons per day. Fire fighting requirements are estimated to be 1,000 gallons per minute. The site is to be served by a newly constructed eight inch diameter cement lined ductile iron water main which will connect to the City system on Fort Avenue (16 inch). A new hydrant will be built on site, the location of which is to be approved by Salem Fire Department. Separate potable water connections will be provided for each dwelling. Sanitary Sewerage Connection and Collection Facilities Shallop Landing is expected to generate an average daily flow of 4,950 gallons per day of domestic wastewater. That wastewater will be collected into a new system of eight inch diameter polyvinyl chloride gravity sewers leading from the Shallop Lane to an existing sewer manhole on Fort Avenue. Storm Drainage Facilities Site drainage will be accomplished by collection of surface runoff into a series of piped catch basins and manholes. Outflow from that system will be directed through an appropriately designed proprietary water quality treatment device before discharge into Collins Cover.•All=catch`basins-will.be_c_on_str_u_cted with_four foot deep sumps and-hooded �oiitlet The system will=be_maintained by the 0_wners_of Shallop-Landing-in accordance with-the require ntnts oftfie Operations and,Maintenance Plan included-with the Stormwater -Management=Plan> Refuse Disposal It is expected that each dwelling will have on site rubbish storage. The project is expected to generate 10-15 tons of domestic refuse annually. Trash and recycling will-be collected-curbside:, • HUMAN CONSIDERATIONS Aesthetics and Visual Impact The site is currently vacant,vegetated with some trees,brush and grasses. There is no apparent maintenance of the property. The following changes are anticipated: • Views into the site will change as a result of the creation of a built-up environment of single family homes; • The site will be regularly maintained by the homeowners; • Any disposal of trash or other debris will cease. • Parks, Forests and Recreational Areas The site is located directly across from Beattie Road on Fort Avenue and approximately 500 feet from Irzyk Park, located at the intersection of Lee Fort Terrace and Fort Avenue. No direct impact on either of those facilities other than increased usage would be anticipated. No existing park, forest or open space areas will be removed from public use. Public Health Long term public health characteristics are expected to improve incrementally as a result of: • Removal of a potential illegal dumping site; • Removal of harborages for insects and rodents; • Improved quality of stormwater discharges into Collins Cove. A licensed pest control contractor shall be retained to apply needed pesticides and rodenticides prior to commencement of site work. Dust generated during site work shall be controlled by wetting and minimizations of exposure times for unstabilized areas. • Professional Land Surveyors & Civil Engineers ESSEX SURVEY SERVICE 1958 - 1986 OSBORN PALMER 1911 - 1970 BRADFORD&WEED - 1885- 1972 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT THE RESIDENCES AT SHALLOP LANDING SZETELA LANE AND FORT AVENUE SALEM, MA 01970 OCTOBER 2009 Owner/Applicant: Shallop Landing, LLC • 40 Lowell Street Peabody, MA 01960 Engineer. Clayton A. Morin, P.E. 30969 (Mass.) Eastern Land Survey Associates, Inc. 104 Lowell Street Peabody, MA 01960 A "OF V U9 CiLA 0 amu, IL w .30369 S�ONAL • 104 LOW ELL STREET PEABODY, MASS. 01960 TELEPHONE: 978-531-8121 FAX: 978-531-5920 TABLE OF CONTENTS • Section Number Page Number One— Site Conditions • Existing Conditions 1-1 • Soil Conditions 1-1 • Resource Areas 1-1 Two— Stormwater Management • Project Description 2-1 • Low Impact Development Measures 2-1 • Standard 1 —No New Untreated Discharges 2-1 • Standard 2—Peak Rate Attenuation 2-1 • Standard 3 —Recharge 2-2 • Standard 4—Water Quality 2-2 • Standard 5 —Land Uses with Higher Potential Pollutant Loads 2-2 • Standard 6— Critical Areas 2.3 • Standard 7—Redevelopments 2-3 • • Standard 8—Construction Period Pollution Prevention and Erosion Control Plan 2-3 • Standard 9—Operation and Maintenance Plan 2-3 • Standard 10—Prohibition of Illicit Discharges 2-4 Three—Hydrologic and Hydraulic Analysis • Standard 1 —Scour/Erosion Analysis 3-1 • Standard 2—Hydrologic Calculations 3-2 • Standard 4—Total Suspended Solids Removal 3-42 • Piped Drainage Facilities Analysis 3-45 Four—Additional Submissions • Permit Requirements • Checklist for Stormwater Report 0 Operations and Maintenance Plan SECTION I SITE CONDITIONS i i • SITE CONDITIONS Existing onditions The site of the proposed Residences at Shallop Landing is located southeast of Szetela Lane, west of Lee Fort Terrace, and north of Foo Avenue of some and Sundry ldry owners of vacant on land• Street in Salem,Massachusetts. The property The Property was used until the 19g0's for a variety of industrial and commercial uses and will be the subject of an Activities Use Limitation due to the presence of contaminated soils on the site. • Soil conditions as urban pletely Soils on site are classifiedof disturlbancand eby a varied are ty of industrial and to have been commercial disturbed by many activities. Soils are also known to be contaminated and require capping• ResourceAreas The site is located southeast of Collins Cove but is located more than 100 feet from the tidal high water mark. The entire site is located within a FEMA Zone B. 1-1 • SECTION 2 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Project Description The site of the Residences at Shallop Landing consists of 2.1 acres of former commercial/industrial land, upon which is to be constructed are 15 single family homes together with an ancillary access roadway, driveways, landscaping and underground utility systems. The site will drain to Collins Cove. Municipal utility services (water and sewer) are available to the site on Fort Avenue. Low Impact Development Measures Since on site soils contain certain contaminents, no low impact development measures other thanrain-barrels-are_proposed_since 4nfiltration procedures are not recommended:. Lined rain gardens with underdrains were also considered but not utilized due to resultant on site soil displacement. Standard 1 • No new stormwater conveyances (e.g. oufalls) may discharge untreated stormwater directly to or cause erosion in wetlands or waters of the Commonwealth. w-- — `Site runoff will be dischaiged'oiito an existing cip rap embaiildh'ent=on Collins Cove:-Ar scour analysis=is=provided in Section 3 J Standard 2 Stormwater management systems shall be designed so that post-development peak discharge rates do not exceed pre-development peak discharge rates. This Standard may be waived for discharges to land subject to coastal storm flowage as defined in 310 CMR 10.04. A waiver from Standard 2 will be sought since discharge is onto land subject to coastal storm flowage. Site drainage will be collected by a series of piped catch basins and manholes and routed through a proprietary treatment device prior to discharge. Computations of pre and post development runoff are provided in Section 3 of this report. 21 Standard 3 Loss of annual recharge to ground water shall be eliminated or minimized through the use of infiltration measures including environmentally sensitive site design, low impact development techniques, stormwater best management practices, and good operation and maintenance. At a minimum, the annual recharge from the post-development site shall approximate the annual recharge from pre-development conditions based on soil type. A waiver of Standard 3 will be requested due to the presence of contaminated soils throughout the site. Standard 4 • Stormwater management systems shall be designed to remove 80%of the average annual post-construction load of Total Suspended Solids (TSS). <A series of-deep sump-hooded_catch-basins will'collect'runoff_from:pav_ed areas of the site ''and'direct that runoff to an appropriately sized Stormeeptor.,A TSS removal rate of 82.75 % will result. No treatment facilities c ntlf Risf. Standard 5 For land uses with higher potential pollutant loads, source control and pollution prevention shall be implemented in accordance with the Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook to eliminate or reduce the discharge of stormwater runoff from such land uses to the maximum extent practicable. The property use is residential and is not considered to be a use with higher potential pollutant loads. 2-2 • Standard 6 Stormwater discharges within the Zone 11 or Interim Wellhead Protection Area of a public water supply and stormwater discharges near or to any other critical area require the use of the specific source control and pollution prevention measures and the specific structural stormwater best management practices determined by the Department to be suitable for managing discharges to such areas as provided in the Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook. Stormwater discharge is not into any water supply area nor near any other critical area. Standard 7 A redevelopment project is required to meet the following Stormwater Management Standards only to the maximum extent practicable: Standard 2, Standard 3, and the pretreatment and structural best management practice requirements of Standards 4, 5 and 6. Existing stormwater discharges shall comply with Standard 1 only to the maximum extent practicable. A redevelopment project shall also comply with all other -• requirements of the Stormwater Management Standards and improve existing conditions. The project is not being treated as a redevelopment since all existing facilities were removed several years ago. Standard 8 A plan to control construction related impacts including erosion, sedimentation and other pollutant sources during construction and land disturbance activities (construction period erosion, sedimentation and pollution prevention plan) shall be developed and implemented. 'An S-WPM-will-be-developed prior,to the_commencement of construction.,An outline erosion control plan is provided in ection 4 and on the Site Plan. Standard 9 A long-term operation and maintenance plan shall be developed and implemented to ensure that stormwater management systems function as designed. A long term Operation and Maintenance Plan is provided in Section A of this report. • 2-3 Standard 10 All illicit discharges to the stormwater management system are prohibited. No known illicit discharges exist on site. An illicit discharge statement will be provided prior to the request for a Certificate of Compliance. • • 2-4 SECTION 3 HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS STANDARD 1 SCOUR/EROSION ANALYSIS EASTERN LAND SURVEY ASSOCIATES, INC. JOB �es�oe iee� " '— S,�w""° LA VD i'a!21 Christopher R. Mello PLS SHEET NO. OF • 104 Lowell Street CALCULATED BY =A jk vv, DATE 4+ 4e'![PEABODY, MA 01960 (978) 531-8121 CHECKED® DATE SCALE 5'Gowi_QA20 1 SCoJ Aa]At v� 9 10 .�tMrt L'O�Se.uDrtse.. QuzlCl.__ e ............. -'P.Fn+- SF`:.er' 1jq . . u.cN... W OQ-1V5 LE t.J E4a. � fir Lc�E.J S�ov.(L z R + Ne DUrc�PQQ. iZLp. aP .P� Tue, of= STANDARD 2 HYDROLOGIC CALCULATIONS W9� ws6 wsc- wso 2 3 4 �--Ssc�me•a 11 •S• C • � ( � ©per SPnce CN =14' FHydraflow Hydrographs Diagram Project: SZETELAEXIST.gpw 10-08-2009 Hydrograph Plot • Hydrafiow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 1 WS Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.09 cfs Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time interval = 2 min Drainage area = 0.09 ac Curve number = 74 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 7 min Total precip. = 3.10 in Distribution = Type III Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Hydrograph Volume=318 cuft 1 - SCS Runoff - 2 Yr- Qp = 0.09 cfs 0.10 0.08 • 0.06-- 0,04----- 0.02 .060.040.02 0.00 t-- 0.0 2.4 4.8 7.2 9.6 12.0 14.4 16.8 19.2 21.6 24.0 Time(hrs) / Hyd. 1 • Hydrograph Plot • Hydrafiow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 1 WS A Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.19 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time interval = 2 min Drainage area = 0.09 ac Curve number = 74 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 7 min Total precip. = 4.60 in Distribution = Type III Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Hydrograph Volume=670 cult 1 - SCS Runoff- 10 Yr - Qp = 0.19 cfs o.zo 0.15 • Q � 0.10 Ol 0.05 0.00 1 1 0.0 2.4 4.8 72 9.6 12.0 14.4 16.8 19.2 21.6 24.0 Time(hrs) / Hyd. 1 • Hydrograph Plot • Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 1 WS Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.39 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time interval = 2 min Drainage area = 0.09 ac Curve number = 74 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = oft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 7 min Total precip. = 7.00 in Distribution = Type III Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Hydrograph Volume=1,321 cult 7 -SCS Runoff - 100 Yr- Qp = 0.39 cfs 0.4 0.3 — • w 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 2.4 4.8 7.2 9.6 12.0 14.4 16.8 19.2 21.6 24.0 Time(hrs) / Hyd. 1 • TR55 Tc Worksheet Page 1 • Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 1 WS A Storm frequency = yrs Sheet Flow Manning's n-value = 0.240 Flow length = 40.0 ft Two-year 24-hr precip. = 3.10 in Land slope = 2.0 Travel Time ........................................ = 7.0 min Shallow Concentrated Flow Flow length = 0 ft Watercourse slope = 0.0 % Surface description = Paved Average velocity = 0.00 ft/s TravelTime ........................................ = 0.0 min Channel Flow Cross section flow area = 0.0 sqft • Wetted perimeter = 0.0 ft Channel slope = 0.0 % Manning's n-value = 0.015 Velocity = 0.00 ft/s Flow length = 0.0 ft TravelTime ........................................ = min Total Travel Time, Tc ........................ = 7.0 min • TR55 Tc Worksheet Page 1 • Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 2 WS Storm frequency = yrs Sheet Flow Manning's n-value = 0.170 Flow length = 80.0 ft Two-year 24-hr precip. = 3.10 in Land slope = 1.2 % Travel Time ........................................ = 11.3 min Shallow Concentrated Flow Flow length = 0 ft Watercourse slope = 0.0 % Surface description = Paved Average velocity = 0.00 ft/s Travel Time ........................................ = 0.0 min Channel Flow • Cross section flow area = 0.0 sqft Wetted perimeter = 0.0 ft Channel slope = 0.0 % Manning's n-value = 0.015 Velocity = 0.00 ft/s Flow length = 0.0 ft Travel Time ........................................ = min Total Travel Time, Tc ........................ = 11.3 min • Hydrograph Plot Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 2 WS B Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.26 cfs Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time interval = 6 min Drainage area = 0.36 ac Curve number = 74 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 11.3 min Total precip. = 3.10 in Distribution = Type III Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Hydrograph Volume=1,191 cult 2 - SCS Runoff - 2 Yr - Qp = 0.26 cfs 0.30-- - 0.25-- 0.20-- 0.15 .300.250.200.15 0.10- 0.05----- 0.00 .100.050.00 0.0 2.4 4.8 7.2 9.6 12.0 14.4 16.8 19.2 21.6 24.0 Time(hrs) / Hyd. 2 Hydrograph Plot • Hydraflow Hydrographs by Irrtelisolve Hyd. No. 2 WS B Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.58 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time interval = 6 min Drainage area = 0.36 ac Curve number = 74 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 11.3 min Total precip. = 4.60 in Distribution = Type III Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Hydrograph Volume=2,511 cult 2 - SCS Runoff- 10 Yr- Qp = 0.58 cfs 0.6 0.5 0.4 � 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 2.4 4.8 7.2 9.6 12.0 14.4 16.8 19.2 21.6 24.0 Time(hrs) / Hyd. 2 • 3 -9 Hydrograph Plot HHydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve yd. No. 2 WS Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 1.16 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time interval = 6 min Drainage area = 0.36 ac Curve number = 74 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 11.3 min Total precip. = 7.00 in Distribution = Type III Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Hydrograph Volume=4,952 cult 2 - SCS Runoff- 100 Yr- Qp = 1.16 cfs 1.5 1.0 C1 05- 0.0 5 0.0 0.0 2.4 4.8 7.2 9.6 12.0 14.4 16.8 19.2 21.6 24.0 Time (hrs) / Hyd. 2 • 3-io TR55 Tc Worksheet Page 1 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 3 WS C Storm frequency = yrs Sheet Flow Manning's n-value = 0.240 Flow length = 100.0 ft Two-year 24-hr precip. = 3.10 in Land slope = 2.2 % Travel Time ........................................ = 14.0 min Shallow Concentrated Flow Flow length = 75 ft Watercourse slope = 1.2 % Surface description = Unpaved Average velocity = 1.77 ft/s Travel Time ........................................ = 0.7 min Channel Flow Cross section flow area = 0.0 sqft Wetted perimeter = 0.0 ft • Channel slope = 0.0 % Manning's n-value = 0.015 Velocity = 0.00 ft/s Flow length = 0.0 ft Travel Time ........................................ = min Total Travel Time, Tc ........................ = 14.7 min • 3- 1t Hydrograph Plot Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 3 WS C Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.21 cfs Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time interval = 6 min Drainage area = 0.28 ac Curve number = 74 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = Oft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 14.7 min Total precip. = 3.10 in Distribution = Type III Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Hydrograph Volume=926 cult 3 - SCS Runoff - 2 Yr -Qp = 0.21 cfs 0.25 — 0.20 • ,� 0.15 U Q 0.10- 0.05--- 0.00 .10.050.00 0.0 2.4 4.8 7.2 9.6 12.0 14.4 16.8 19.2 21.6 24.0 Time(hrs) / Hyd. 3 3 -12 Hydrograph Plot Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 3 WS C Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.45 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time interval = 6 min Drainage area = 9 0.28 ac Curve number = 74 BasinSI o e - 0.0 °- p �0 Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 14.7 min Total precip. = 4.60 in Distribution = Type III Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Hydrograph Volume=1,953 cult 3 - SCSR unoff - 10Yr - Qp = 0.45cfs 0.5 0.4 • ,� EIM 0.3 v 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 2.4 4.8 7.2 S2 9.6 12.0 14.4 16.8 19.2 21.6 24.0 Time(hrs) / Hyd.3 • Hydrograph Plot Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve • Hyd. No. 3 WS C Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.90 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time interval = 6 min Drainage area = 0.28 ac Curve number = 74 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 14.7 min Total precip. = 7.00 in Distribution = Type III Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Hydrograph Volume=3,852 cult 3 - SCS Runoff - 100 Yr - Qp = 0.90 cfs 1.0 0.8 C7 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 2.4 4.8 7.2 9.6 12.0 14.4 16.8 19.2 21.6 24.0 Time (hrs) / Hyd. 3 • 3-'4- TR55 Tc Worksheet Page 7 • Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 4 WS D Storm frequency = yrs Sheet Flow Manning's n-value = 0.240 Flow length = 100.0 ft Two-year 24-hr precip. = 3.10 in Land slope = 0.8 % Travel Time ........................................ = 20.9 min Shallow Concentrated Flow Flow length = 125 ft Watercourse slope = 2.0 % Surface description = Unpaved Average velocity = 2.28 ft/s Travel Time ........................................ = 0.9 min Channel Flow Cross section flow area = 0.0 sqft Wetted perimeter = 0.0 ft • Channel slope = 0.0 % Manning's n-value = 0.015 Velocity = 0.00 ft/s Flow length = 0.0 ft Travel Time ........................................ = min III Total Travel Time, Tc ........................ = 21.8 min III • 3_tt Hydrograph Plot Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 4 WS D Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.97 cfs Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time interval = 6 min Drainage area = 1.54 ac Curve number = 74 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 21.8 min Total precip. = 3.10 in Distribution = Type III Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Hydrograph Volume=5,435 cuft 4 - SCS Runoff - 2 Yr- Qp = 0.97 cfs 1.0 0.8 -- J 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 2.4 4.8 7.2 9.6 12.0 14.4 16.8 19.2 21.6 24.0 Time(hrs) / Hyd.4 3-�t. Hydrograph Plot Hydraflow Hydrographs by Imelisolve Hyd. No. 4 WS D Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 2.18 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time interval = 6 min Drainage area = 1.54 ac Curve number = 74 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 21.8 min Total precip. = 4.60 in Distribution = Type III Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Hydrograph Volume=11,457 cult 4 - SCS Runoff - 10 Yr- Qp = 2.18 cfs 2.5 2.0 . je 1,5-- 1.0----- 0.5 .51.00.5 0.0 0.0 2.4 4.8 7.2 9.6 12.0 14.4 16.8 19.2 21.6 24.0 Time(hrs) / Hyd. 4 • 3-iR EASTERN LAND SURVEY ASSOCIATES, INC. JOB '10L Christopher R. Mello PLS SHEET NO. OF • 104 Lowell Street CALCULATED BY -1`1 W-A DATE 04) PEABODY, MA 01960 (978) 531-8121 CHECKED DATE SCALE c- s: ............ !'l A. ........... ............. ........... ..........4- 0.9 ne c_"A Cela CACI py¢ec Anew4 .............. .......... ........... ..........- 4_ 50 -11 -4Z ........... . ........... ........... ............. Sl 0 p2 0. ........... ...................... .......... . .......... 'ILL qtr: 6 1 ............ ........... ............ ........... ............ 'P P ( 98 ....4#L ...... ctg 4Z-,l .......... j....... .......... .......... 1P ............ cick ........... .. ........... .................- ............ ........... . .............. ............. .............. ...................... ......... .......... QjF 6s L .......... .......... ............... .......... ........ . . ......... .. ................ ............ .......... ........... ............ T-149:! ..................... T t .30 ............... .......... ................. ....... ............. 15 TV- .......... 'ft i .......... gine ......... 4Aj..0WGk.S14..............T.>P ........... is-_E-il L- .. .............. . ..... ........... ........... .....................1 .......... .......... ....... ...... ........ ........... 04= I - I ..... ..... -14 ............... .......... 4 3 JOB EASTERN LAND SURVEY ASSOCIATES, INC. Christopher R. Mello PLS SHEET NO. OF • 1,04 Lowell Street CALCULATED BY Jw M DATE 10 PEABODY, MA 01960 (978) 531-8121 CHECKED BY DATE SCALE .. ................. 690 cc ovaN .......... A 0,-1,o X,' ft- W7: VD%�WMk;" ............ 1pipm .4-0 i .................. �4) — 4 k..b.4%7Q ;7.�.......... 0-S e�01 . aj..r 4> Z ......... .......... `LoyJwn.o i�tzoPev Q 'A ec, Ir Ia pJp 404: a L ..... ........ ...... .. ........ Q 7z 1 E0'.4j. -IC-4 cu A-1 b loo. ZtyL tt- f` qbc Fvv.. .............. . . ............ ............... ........... ...... -58i 1.11 1 L r) c 39............ .............. ............... .................................................... Is ............ ............-................ ............. . .......... ......... ........ ............ ............... ...................... ............. ............ .......... CJS R wsgp gag CP w S E Q 2 s tasnp 3-2( Hydraflow Hydrographs Diagram Project: SZETELAPROP.gpw 10-13-2009 TR55 Tc Worksheet Page • Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intellsolve Hyd. No. 1 Storm frequency = yrs Sheet Flow Manning's n-value = 0.240 Flow length = 100.0 ft Two-year 24-hr precip. = 3.10 in Land slope = 3.0 % Travel Time ........................................ = 12.3 min Shallow Concentrated Flow Flow length = 15 ft Watercourse slope = 1.0 % Surface description = Unpaved Average velocity = 1.61 ft/s Travel Time ........................................ = 0.2 min Channel Flow Cross section flow area = 0.0 sqft • Wetted perimeter = 0.0 ft Channel slope = 0.0 % Manning's n-value = 0.015 Velocity = 0.00 ft/s Flow length = 0.0 ft Travel Time ........................................ = min Total Travel Time, Tc ........................ = 12.5 min • Hydrograph Plot • Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 1 WS AP Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.44 cfs Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time interval = 6 min Drainage area = 0.42 ac Curve number = 80 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 12.5 min Total precip. = 3.10 in Distribution = Type III Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Hydrograph Volume=1,895 cult 1 -SCS Runoff - 2 Yr - Qp = 0.44 cfs 0.5- 0.4--- 0.3--- 0.2-- 0.01 .50.40.30.20.0 0.0 2.4 4.8 7.2 9.6 12.0 14.4 16.8 19.2 21.6 24.0 Time(hrs) / Hyd. 1 • Hydrograph Plot • Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 1 WS AP Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.85 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time interval = 6 min Drainage area = 0.42 ac Curve number = 80 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 12.5 min Total precip. = 4.60 in Distribution = Type III Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Hydrograph Volume=3,640 cuR 1 - SCS Runoff - 10 Yr- Qp = 0.85 cfs 1.0 11 —77 0.8 w 0.6 CY U 0.4-- 0.2-- 0.0 .40.20.0 0.0 2.4 4.8 7.2 9.6 12.0 14.4 16.8 19.2 21.6 24.0 Time(hrs) / Hyd. 1 • Hydrograph Plot • Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intellsolve Hyd. No. 1 WS AP Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 1.55 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time interval = 6 min Drainage area = 0.42 ac Curve number = 80 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 12.5 min Total precip. = 7.00 in Distribution = Type III Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Hydrograph Volume=6,710 cult 1 - SCS Runoff- 100 Yr - Qp = 1.55 cfs 2.0 1.5 - C7 0.5 0.0 - 0.0 2.4 4.8 7.2 9.6 12.0 14.4 16.8 19.2 21.6 24.0 Time (hrs) / Hyd. 1 TR55 Tc Worksheet Page 1 . Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 2 WS BP Storm frequency = yrs Sheet Flow Manning's n-value = 0.240 Flow length = 25.0 ft Two-year 24-hr precip. = 3.10 in Land slope = 2.0 % Travel Time ........................................ = 4.8 min Shallow Concentrated Flow Flow length = 0 ft Watercourse slope = 0.0 % Surface description = Paved Average velocity = 0.00 ft/s Travel Time ........................................ = 0.0 min Channel Flow Cross section flow area = 0.0 sqft • Wetted perimeter = 0.0 ft Channel slope = 0.0 % Manning's n-value = 0.015 Velocity = 0.00 ft/s Flow length = 0.0 ft Travel Time ........................................ = min Total Travel Time, Tc ........................ = 4.8 min Hydrograph Plot • HydraFlow Hydrographs by IntelisoNe Hyd. No. 2 WS BP Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.18 cfs Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time interval = 1 min Drainage area = 0.12 ac Curve number = 78 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 4.8 min Total precip. = 3.10 in Distribution = Type III Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Hydrograph Volume=522 cult 2 - SCS Runoff - 2 Yr- Qp = 0.18 cfs 0.20- 0.15- 0.10------ 0.05------ 0.001 .200.150.100.050.00 0.0 2.4 4.8 7.2 9.6 12.0 14.4 16.8 19.2 21.6 24.0 Time(hrs) / Hyd. 2 • Hydrograph Plot Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 2 WS BP Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.36 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time interval = 1 min Drainage area = 0.12 ac Curve number = 78 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = oft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 4.8 min Total precip. = 4.60 in Distribution = Type III Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Hydrograph Volume=1,034 cult 2 - SCS Runoff- 10 Yr - Qp = 0.36 cfs 0.4 0.3 d 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 2.4 4.8 7.2 9.6 12.0 14.4 16.8 19.2 21.6 24.0 Time(hrs) / Hyd.2 • Hydrograph Plot . Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 2 WS BP Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.67 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time interval = 1 min Drainage area = 0.12 ac Curve number = 78 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 4.8 min Total precip. = 7.00 in Distribution = Type III Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Hydrograph Volume=1,948 cuft 2 - SCS Runoff - 100 Yr- Qp = 0.67 cfs 0.8 0.s CY 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 2.4 4.8 7.2 9.6 12.0 14.4 16.8 19.2 21.6 24.0 Time (hrs) / Hyd. 2 TR55 Tc Worksheet Pagel . Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 3 Storm frequency = yrs Sheet Flow Manning's n-value = 0.240 Flow length = 82.0 ft Two-year 24-hr precip. = 3.10 in Land slope = 2.0 % Travel Time ........................................ = 12.4 min Shallow Concentrated Flow Flow length = 120 ft Watercourse slope = 1.0 % Surface description = Paved Average velocity = 2.03 ft/s Travel Time ........................................ = 1.0 min Channel Flow Cross section flow area = 0.0 sqft Wetted perimeter = 0.0 ft Channel slope = 0.0 % Manning's n-value = 0.015 Velocity = 0.00 ft/s Flow length = 0.0 ft Travel Time ........................................ = min Total Travel Time, Tc ........................ = 13.4 min • Hydrograph Plot • Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 3 WS CP Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.39 cfs Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time interval = 6 min Drainage area = 0.24 ac Curve number = 90 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 13.4 min Total precip. = 3.10 in Distribution = Type III Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Hydrograph Volume=1,696 auft 3 - SCS Runoff- 2 Yr- Qp = 0.39 cfs 0.4 -- 0.3- 0.2 .3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 2.4 4.8 7.2 9.6 12.0 14.4 16.8 19.2 21.6 24.0 Time(hrs) / Hyd. 3 • Hydrograph Plot Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 3 WS CP Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.64 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time interval = 6 min Drainage area = 0.24 ac Curve number = 90 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft � � Tc method = TR55 Time conc.of Tc = 13.4 min Total precip. = 4.60 in Distribution = Type III Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Hydrograph Volume=2,852 cuft 3 - SCS Runoff - 10 Yr- Qp = 0.64 cfs .8 0 P0.6 i a 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 2.4 4.8 7.2 9.6 12.0 14.4 16.8 19.2 21.6 24.0 Time(hrs) / Hyd. 3 z n.. Hydrograph Plot • Hydraflow Hydrogmphs by Irrtelisolve Hyd. No. 3 WS CP Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 1.04 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time interval = 6 min Drainage area = 0.24 ac Curve number = 90 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 13.4 min Total precip. = 7.00 in Distribution = Type III Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Hydrograph Volume=4,756 cult 3 - SCS Runoff - 100 Yr - Qp = 1.04 cfs 1.5 • 1.0 d 0.5 0.0 0.0 2.4 4.8 7.2 9.6 12.0 14.4 16.8 19.2 21.6 24.0 Time (hrs) / Hyd. 3 TR55 Tc Worksheet Page 1 • Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 4 Storm frequency = yrs Sheet Flow Manning's n-value = 0.240 Flow length = 50.0 ft Two-year 24-hr precip. = 3.10 in Land slope = 1.0 % Travel Time ........................................ = 11.0 min Shallow Concentrated Flow Flow length = 118 ft Watercourse slope = 1.0 % Surface description = Paved Average velocity = 2.03 ft/s Travel Time ........................................ = 1.0 min Channel Flow Cross section flow area = 0.0 sqft • Wetted perimeter = 0.0 ft Channel slope = 0.0 % Manning's n-value = 0.015 Velocity = 0.00 ft/s Flow length = 0.0 ft Travel Time ........................................ = min Total Travel Time, Tc ........................ = 12.0 min • z � � Hydrograph Plot • HydraOow Hydrographs by Irrtelisolve Hyd. No. 4 WS DP Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 2.37 cfs Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time interval = 6 min Drainage area = 1.40 ac Curve number = 91 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = oft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 12 min Total precip. = 3.10 in Distribution = Type III Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Hydrograph Volume=10,313 cult —F 4 - SCS Runoff- 2Yr - Qp = 2.37 cfs 2.5 2.0 — • ,e 1.5 V (7 1.0 0.5 0.0 I 0.0 2.4 4.8 7.2 9.6 12.0 14.4 16.8 19.2 21.6 24.0 Time(hrs) / Hyd. 4 Hydrograph Plot Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 4 WS DP Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 3.84 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time interval = 6 min Drainage area = 1.40 ac Curve number = 91 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 12 min Total precip. = 4.60 in Distribution = Type III Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Hydrograph Volume=17,126 cuft 4 - SCS Runoff- 10 Yr- Qp = 3.84 cfs 4- 3- 0 30 0.0 2.4 4.8 7.2 9.6 12.0 14.4 16.8 19.2 21.6 24.0 Time(hrs) / Hyd.4 Hydrograph Plot • Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelmolve Hyd. No. 4 WS DP Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 6.16 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time interval = 6 min Drainage area = 1.40 ac Curve number = 91 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 12 min Total precip. = 7.00 in Distribution = Type III Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Hydrograph Volume=28,294 cult 4 -SCS Runoff- 100 Yr- QP = 6.16 cfs s s w v a z 0 0.0 2.4 4.8 7.2 9.6 12.0 14.4 16.8 19.2 21.6 24.0 Time(hrs) / Hyd. 4 • TR55 Tc Worksheet Page 1 • Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 5 WS EP Storm frequency = yrs Sheet Flow Manning's n-value = 0.240 Flow length = 35.0 ft Two-year 24-hr precip. = 3.10 in Land slope = 1.0 % Travel Time ........................................ = 8.3 min Shallow Concentrated Flow Flow length = 0 ft Watercourse slope = 0.0 % Surface description = Paved Average velocity = 0.00 ft/s Travel Time ........................................ = 0.0 min Channel Flow Cross section flow area = 0.0 sqft Wetted perimeter = 0.0 ft Channel slope = 0.0 % Manning's n-value = 0.015 Velocity = 0.00 ft/s Flow length = 0.0 ft Travel Time ........................................ = min Total Travel Time, Tc ........................ = 8.3 min Hydrograph Plot • Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 5 WS EP Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.09 cfs Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time interval = 2 min Drainage area = 0.09 ac Curve number = 74 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 8.3 min Total precip. = 3.10 in Distribution = Type III Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Hydrograph Volume=318 cuR 5 - SCS Runoff- 2 Yr- Qp = 0.09 cfs 0.10 o.0s • je 0.06------ 0 C7 0.04 0.02- 0.00 0.0 2.4 4.8 7.2 9.6 12.0 14.4 16.8 19.2 21.6 24.0 Time(hrs) / Hyd. 5 • Hydrograph Plot • Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 5 WS EP Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.19 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time interval = 2 min Drainage area = 0.09 ac Curve number = 74 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 8.3 min Total precip. = 4.60 in Distribution = Type III Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Hydrograph Volume=670 cub 5 - SCS Runoff - 10 Yr- Op = 0.19 cfs 0.20 0.15 • w d 0.10 0.05 0.00 0.0 2.4 4.8 7.2 9.6 12.0 14.4 16.8 19.2 21.6 24.0 Time(hrs) / Hyd. 5 • Hydrograph Plot • Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 5 WS EP Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.39 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time interval = 2 min Drainage area = 0.09 ac Curve number = 74 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 8.3 min Total precip. = 7.00 in Distribution = Type III Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Hydrograph Volume=1,321 cuft 5 -SCS Runoff - 100 Yr- Qp = 0.39 cfs 0.4 0.3- � 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 2.4 4.8 7.2 9.6 12.0 14.4 16.8 19.2 21.6 24.0 Time(hrs) / Hyd. 5 • STANDARD 4 TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS REMOVAL Nuwularnekd:Mx.4,20M INSTRUCTIONS: I.Sheet is nonautomated.Print sheet and complete using hand calculations.Column A and B:See MassDEP Structural BMP Table Fxcal Column Headings 2.The calculations must be completed using the Column Headings specified in Chart and Not the 3.To complete Chart Column D,multiple Column B value within Row x Column C value wllhln Row 4.To complete Chart Column E value,subtract Column D value within Row from Column C within Row 5.Total TSS Removal=Sum All Values In Column D s Location: fa.f •�`B C B D A Amount Remaining TSS Removal Starting TSS Removed t Load GD BMP+ Rate+ Load" pJ C r7erP: SurnP. 2,5�/a O .2-S •1S ' 1.00 '/o 0:15 o S"t'15 A 16. Ut Y E � DC N FN.. SeparateForm Needs to be Completed for Each outlet or BMP Train Total TSS Removal = Project: as b Equals remaining load from previous BMP(E) Prepared By. which enters the BMP Date: . o $I O. Non�mmslad TSS Cdwlc6on Sheet must be used ffProPnele7'BMP PMPwe BMP Propod Maee.r.From MessDEP Sr rmwaler Handbodr Val i 1.N.From MMamD_ TSS 011wisrron Shea EP Slormwalsr HwWbookuused APmpdetarY seVI.1 JOB 1M6 1LP> > A-1 C top 0 SVS EASTERN LAND SURVEY ASSOCIATES, INC. SHEET NO. OF Christopher R. Mello PLS �°/a 104 Lowell Street CALCULATED By -1 a1*� DATE PEABODY, MA 01960DATE (978) 531-8121 CHECK SCALE S-co2..nce P-lu ... S �zwS. cotcy��t S• ER peP L elLYlou4. 1. 21te1 S1 c. 24G14... '1zFCeq_? 4e-0 FLc� J RP�bT -poR SIL, OF _.... •�3GF4 _.... C-to .... csE< eoaPl2rneo , '3 �-.... ^^OJVFacltjfta�...._ , • An Imperial Model STC 2000(equivalent to the Technology Status Modcl STC 2400)in Edmonton,Canada treats flow from The Stormceptor system provides greater solids a 9.8 acre commercial parking lot. This system was separation and higher TSS removal efficiencies than oil monitored during four storm events in 1996 and shown to and grit separators. Stormceptor systems are among the have an average total suspended solids(TSS)removal category of hydrodynamic separators, which are flow- efficiency of 52 percent. In designing a system to achieve through devices with the capacity to settle or separate a comparable removal efficiency,the relationship be Wit,oil,sediment,or other pollutants from stormwater. tween system size and impervious drainage area should According to the U.S.Environmental Protection Agency, be considered,as detailed in Table I and the Technology "Hydrodynamic separators are most effective where the Assessment Report. materials to be removed from runoff are heavy particu- lates-which can be settled- or floatables-which can be A Model STC 1200 in Westwood,Massachusetts captured,rather than solids with poor settleability or treats flow from 0.65 acres consisting of a paved truck dissolvedpollutants." loading area at a manufacturing facility.The unit was monitored for six storm events in 1997,but only four The field studies evaluated for the STEP assessment events had measurable TSS influent concentrations. Of prate the Stormwater Best Management Practice these four events, the average TSS removal efficiency Demonstration Tier II Protocol(2001),which is appli- was calculated to be 77 percent,which is less than the 80 cable in Massachusetts and other states in the Technol- percent removal targeted by the manufacturer. ogy Acceptance Reciprocity Partnership (TARP), to ensure quality controlled studies that can be shared Based on these field monitoring results,and when the among participating states.Therefore, interstate reciproc- unit sizing follows the guidance in Table 1,removal ity is not available to the manufacturer,based on perfor- efficiencies between 52 percent and 77 percent may be mance claims that were evaluated by STEP in 1998. If achieved where installations have similar rainfall and land the TARP Protocol requirements are fulfilled in the • use characteristics as those reviewed for the STEP future, the manufacturer could pursue reciprocal verifi- evaluation.It is recommended that additional field re- cation for Stormceptor systems in participating TARP search and new data be evaluated to validate perfor- states.More information on the TARP Protocol is mance ratings higher than those verified by STEP. available on the following Web site:www.dep.state.pa.us/ Specific performance claims for oil and grease were dep/deputate/pollprev/techservices/tarp. not evaluated by STEP. However,total petroleum hydrocarbons(TPH)were analyzed during the Applications/Advantagesrmccl Stormecg Westwood study.Results indicated that the unit was tor systems identified in Table 1 should be effective in capturing oils. used in combination with other BMPs to remove 80 percent of the average annual load of TSS (DEP Stormwater Policy Standard 4). Systems may be well suited for pretreatment in a mixed component system designed for stormwater recharge. rt-184 __. --.__..---ate ._---------------_._.._0 9 ' Performance data show that Stormceptor may provide 0.71:45 TSS removal rates in the range of 52 percent to 77 t'25 256 percent when sized according to Table 1.Higher TSS STC 2404 1.65 a35 removal rates were achieved during low flow,low in- STC 3600 26 5.3 _____ tensity storms with less than one third of an inch of ST -3w6_....._.._,__.__.._.-._�..._ runoff: Also,byreducing the imperviousdrainagearea, STC 6000 4.6 9 relative to the system size,the STEP Technology As- STC6000 __._.__._..... _.__.._.-.._.. _... ._tt. - sessment Report indicated that higher removal efficien- Table 1: Sizing for TSS removal (adapted cies may be achievable.However, STEP recommends • from the manufacturer's sizing in the 1998 collection of additional data"representing a varied set STEP Report) Use the table to determine a TSS of operating conditions over a realistic maintenance removal rate. Use the new Rinker method for sizing cycle to verify TSS removal rates eater than 80 er- i Stormceptor units. The sizing method has been c3' fY !l< P changed since publication of the STEP Report. cent" Note: To achieve 52% and 77% TSS removal rates on some sites, It may be necessary to use lower The Stormceptor system is suitable for new and retro- maximum impervious areas than those in Table 1. fit applications.For retrofit applications,it should not PIPED DRAINAGE FACILITIES ANALYSIS JOB JL.PS I4C�JCCY �i �.IC�GO I_.0 JD�yS EASTERN LAND SURVEY ASSOCIATES, INC. Christopher R. Mello PLS SHEE NO. OF 104 Lowell Street CALCUUTEDBY DATE %Q /o-y • PEABODY, MA 01960 Tom' (508).531-8121 CHECKED BY - �� _ DATE SCALE ___ .... AG"T[JAL VELOCITY . . o . _J. . ....0 w . ..... ._......... F[7LL 9 v1pclTr : icn M _ . H d' Q ,� _. CAPACITY — - . - -- - . - G: N -; .. . �;. c� — : DIAFIET);R �l� i r j r O r 1 i - - - — ' 4 �' J j ... - -- - - _ --- INTENSI-TY- ;- ` - --- 1— - LTIM-- CA �� AN �� 00 ORUNOFFCDEFFICIEbtf _..oa ._...._ ._-_....01. 77 � J .� a J..N� 2 r ;.r w and d}N a.;N N 2%_4c 10-22 TTTTTTTTT= Drainage and Erosion Control • 10.0 9.0 8.0 7.0 6.0 c a 10 rn %k 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 6 yFs s 4�, z FREQUENCY (YRS. ) L 1.0sgs .9 d •8 2 .7 y .6 L U .4 } • F U) Z 2 w H Z .1$ J J a 1 LL Z .09 Q .Ofi � .07 .O6 .0$ .04 .03 .02 .01 5 6 7 8 9 10 15 20 30 40 50 60 2 3 4 5 6 8 10 12 18 24 (MINUTES) DURATION (HOURS) • Figure 10-4. Intensity — Duration — Frequency Curve for Boston, MA 3-4 c • PIPE CAPACITY CALCULATIONS Sewer Pipes— English Units CNA Tools/or Windows (10.13-2009, 13:06:58) Flowrate Diameter Friction slope Velocity (cfs) (in) I1 M (fps) 3.25 12.00 0.013 0.83 4.13 9.97 18.00 0.013 0.90 5.64 20.61 24.00 0.013 0. 83 6.56 10.12 24.00 0.013 0.20 3.22 • • 3_dn DRAINAGE &SEWERAGE-HYDRAULIC COMPUTATIONS-5 • _ — a- Croce- secfional _ For pi cs Full _ area of waterway or ha f-full ,o= wetted perimeter R = 0 4 RP= Hydraulic radius. SECTION OF ANY OPEN CHANtJEL SECTION OF CIRCULAR PIPE V=Averoge or neon ve%cify in feet per sernnd. Q = a V-Discharge of Pipe or channel in cubic feet per second h = Coefficient of roughness of,oip¢ or channel surface , see Table A-Py./8 68. S =S/o,oe of Hydraulic Gradient (wa/er surFoce in open channels or Pipes not under pressure, same as s/oPe of channel or pipe invert only when flow is ulsi/orrn in constant section. FIG. A— HYDRAULIC ELEMENTS OF CHANNEL SECTIONS. too 90 80 2 70 Lu 60 v — Ile 10sc. 3 Ck) - .&j so O v`v ILL lz- 40 LL adjds O 30 G I- faIoct L' w 20 0 to 0 O 10 20 30 40 50 GO 70 80 90 too Ito 120 HYDRAULIC ELEMENTS PER CENT OF VALUE FOR FULL SECTION (APPROXIMATE) EXAMPLE.• !'liven : Discharge =/2 c f's• through o pipe which has capacity f/owing !u// of /S CAS- at a ve%city of 70//Per sec. Requiied tofluor Yfor Q- /2 af:s. Peeeenfage of fu// ahchargn - 41 - 80% . Enter chart of 80% of vo/ue r fu//sec/ion of Hydraulic Elements, >rird Y-//2.5%x7-7.9 ft per sec. F16. 5-VALUES OF HYDRAULIC ELEMENTS OF CIRCULAR SECTION FOR VARIOUS DEPTHS OF FLOW. 3- 48 SECTION 4 ADDITIONAL SUBMISSIONS LIST OF REQUIRED PERMITS Subdivision Approval - Salem Planning Board Site Plan Approval — Salem Planning Board Order of Conditions — Salem Conservation Commission • Building Permit— Salem Building Inspector Chapter 91 License —Massachusetts Dept. of Environmental Protection (for Stormwater Discharge) Acknowledgement of Notice of Intent - U.S. Environmental Protection Agency • Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands Program Checklist for Stormwater Report B. Stormwater Checklist and Certification The following checklist is intended to serve as a guide for applicants as to the elements that ordinarily need to be addressed in a complete Stormwater Report. The checklist is also intended to provide conservation commissions and other reviewing authorities with a summary of the components necessary for a comprehensive Stormwater Report that addresses the ten Stormwater Standards. Note. Because stormwater requirements vary from project to project, it is possible that a complete Stormwater Report may not include information on some of the subjects specified in the Checklist. If it is determined that a specific item does not apply to the project under review, please note that the item is not applicable (N.A.)and provide the reasons for that determination. A complete checklist must include the Certification set forth below signed by the Registered Professional Engineer who prepared the Stormwater Report. Registered Professional Engineer's Certification I have reviewed the Stormwater Report, including the soil evaluation, computations, Long-term Pollution Prevention Plan, the Construction Period Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (if included), the Long- term Post-Construction Operation and Maintenance Plan, the Illicit Discharge Compliance Statement(if included) and the plans showing the stormwater management system, and have determined that they have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Stormwater Management Standards as further elaborated by the Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook. I have also determined that the • information presented in the Stormwater Checklist is accurate and that the information presented in the Stormwater Report accurately reflects conditions at the site as of the date of this permit application. Registered Professional Engineer Block and Signature NA oyc MORIN m CIVIL N&30969 0/9TE�o 1 TONAL Kpez�z"i�i�%� io-9-o i9nature d Date Checklist Project Type: Is the application for new development, redevelopment, or a mix of new and redevelopment? ® New development ❑ Redevelopment • ❑ Mix of New Development and Redevelopment Checklist for Stormwater Report 051909•04/01/08 p Stonnwater Report Checklist•Page 2-of 8 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands Program Checklist for Stormwater Report Checklist (continued) LID Measures: Stormwater Standards require LID measures to be considered. Document what environmentally sensitive design and LID Techniques were considered during the planning and design of the project: ® No disturbance to any Wetland Resource Areas ❑ Site Design Practices(e.g. clustered development, reduced frontage setbacks) ❑ Reduced Impervious Area (Redevelopment Only) ❑ Minimizing disturbance to existing trees and shrubs ❑ LID Site Design Credit Requested: ❑ Credit 1 ❑ Credit 2 ❑ Credit 3 • ❑ Use of"country drainage"versus curb and gutter conveyance and pipe ❑ Bioretention Cells (includes Rain Gardens) ❑ Constructed Stormwater Wetlands (includes Gravel Wetlands designs) ❑ Treebox Filter ❑ Water Quality Swale ❑ Grass Channel ❑ Green Roof ❑ Other(describe): Standard 1: No New Untreated Discharges ® No new untreated discharges ® Outlets have been designed so there is no erosion or scour to wetlands and waters of the Commonwealth ® Supporting calculations specified in Volume 3 of the Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook included. • Checklist for Stormwater Report 051909•04/01/08 Sto"water Report Checklist-Page 3 of 8 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands Program Checklist for Stormwater Report Checklist (continued) Standard 2: Peak Rate Attenuation ® Standard 2 waiver requested because the project is located in land subject to coastal storm flowage and stormwater discharge is to a wetland subject to coastal flooding. ❑ Evaluation provided to determine whether off-site flooding increases during the 100-year 24-hour storm. ❑ Calculations provided to show that post-development peak discharge rates do not exceed pre- development rates for the 2-year and 10-year 24-hour storms. If evaluation shows that off-site flooding increases during the 100-year 24-hour storm, calculations are also provided to show that post-development peak discharge rates do not exceed pre-development rates for the 100-year 24- hour storm. Standard 3: Recharge ❑ Soil Analysis provided. ❑ Required Recharge Volume calculation provided. ❑ Required Recharge volume reduced through use of the LID site Design Credits. . ❑ Sizing the infiltration, BMPs is based on the following method: Check the method used. ❑ Static ❑ Simple Dynamic ❑ Dynamic Field' ❑ Runoff from all impervious areas at the site discharging to the infiltration BMP. ❑ Runoff from all impervious areas at the site is not discharging to the infiltration BMP and calculations are provided showing that the drainage area contributing runoff to the infiltration BMPs is sufficient to generate the required recharge volume. ❑ Recharge BMPs have been sized to infiltrate the Required Recharge Volume. ® Recharge BMPs have been sized to infiltrate the Required Recharge Volume only to the maximum extent practicable for the following reason: ❑ Site is comprised solely of C and D soils and/or bedrock at the land surface ® M.G.L. c. 21 E sites pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0000 ❑ Solid Waste Landfill pursuant to 310 CMR 19.000 ❑ Project is otherwise subject to Stormwater Management Standards only to the maximum extent practicable. ❑ Calculations showing that the infiltration BMPs will drain in 72 hours are provided. ❑ Property includes a M.G.L. c. 21 E site or a solid waste landfill and a mounding analysis is included. • '80%TSS removal is required prior to discharge to infiltration BMP if Dynamic Field method is used. Checklist for Ston-water Report 051909•04/01/08 Stormwater Report Checklist•Page 4 of 8 OEIMassachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands Program Checklist for Stormwater Report Checklist (continued) Standard 3: Recharge (continued) ❑ The infiltration BMP is used to attenuate peak flows during storms greater than or equal to the 10- year 24-hour storm and separation to seasonal high groundwater is less than 4 feet and a mounding analysis is provided. ❑ Documentation is provided showing that infiltration BMPs do not adversely impact nearby wetland resource areas. Standard 4:Water Quality The Long-Term Pollution Prevention Plan typically includes the following: • Good housekeeping practices; • Provisions for storing materials and waste products inside or under cover; • Vehicle washing controls, • Requirements for routine inspections and maintenance of stormwater BMPs, • Spill prevention and response plans, • Provisions for maintenance of lawns, gardens, and other landscaped areas; • Requirements for storage and use of fertilizers, herbicides, and pesticides; • Pet waste management provisions; • Provisions for operation and management of septic systems; • • Provisions for solid waste management; • Snow disposal and plowing plans relative to Wetland Resource Areas, • Winter Road Salt and/or Sand Use and Storage restrictions, • Street sweeping schedules; • Provisions for prevention of illicit discharges to the stormwater management system; • Documentation that Stormwater BMPs are designed to provide for shutdown and containment in the event of a spill or discharges to or near critical areas or from LUHPPL; • Training for staff or personnel involved with implementing Long-Term Pollution Prevention Plan; • List of Emergency contacts for implementing Long-Term Pollution Prevention Plan. ® A Long-Term Pollution Prevention Plan is attached to Stormwater Report and is included as an attachment to the Wetlands Notice of Intent. ❑ Treatment BMPs subject to the 44%TSS removal pretreatment requirement and the one inch rule for calculating the water quality volume are included, and discharge: ❑ is within the Zone II or Interim Wellhead Protection Area ❑ is near or to other critical areas ❑ is within soils with a rapid infiltration rate (greater than 2.4 inches per hour) ❑ involves runoff from land uses with higher potential pollutant loads. ❑ The Required Water Quality Volume is reduced through use of the LID site Design Credits. ® Calculations documenting that the treatment train meets the 80% TSS removal requirement and, if applicable, the 44% TSS removal pretreatment requirement, are provided. • Checklist for Stormwater Report 051909•04/01/08 Stormwater Report Checklist•Page 5 of 8 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands Program Checklist for Stormwater Report Checklist (continued) Standard 4: Water Quality (continued) ® The BMP is sized (and calculations provided) based on: ❑ The '/" or 1"Water Quality Volume or ® The equivalent flow rate associated with the Water Quality Volume and documentation is provided showing that the BMP treats the required water quality volume. ® The applicant proposes to use proprietary BMPs, and documentation supporting use of proprietary BMP and proposed TSS removal rate is provided. This documentation may be in the form of the propriety BMP checklist found in Volume 2, Chapter 4 of the Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook and submitting copies of the TARP Report, STEP Report, and/or other third party studies verifying performance of the proprietary BMPs. ❑ A TMDL exists that indicates a need to reduce pollutants other than TSS and documentation showing that the BMPs selected are consistent with the TMDL is provided. Standard 5: Land Uses With Higher Potential Pollutant Loads (LUHPPLs) ❑ The NPDES Multi-Sector General Permit covers the land use and the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) has been included with the Stormwater Report. ❑ The NPDES Multi-Sector General Permit covers the land use and the SWPPP will be submitted prior • to the discharge of stormwater to the post-construction stormwater BMPs. ❑ The NPDES Multi-Sector General Permit does not cover the land use. ❑ LUHPPLs are located at the site and industry specific source control and pollution prevention measures have been proposed to reduce or eliminate the exposure of LUHPPLs to rain, snow, snow melt and runoff, and been included in the long term Pollution Prevention Plan. ❑ All exposure has been eliminated. ❑ All exposure has not been eliminated and all BMPs selected are on MassDEP LUHPPL list. ❑ The LUHPPL has the potential to generate runoff with moderate to higher concentrations of oil and grease (e.g. all parking lots with >1000 vehicle trips per day) and the treatment train includes an oil grit separator, a filtering bioretention area, a sand filter or equivalent. Standard 6: Critical Areas ❑ The discharge is near or to a critical area and the treatment train includes only BMPs that MassDEP has approved for stormwater discharges to or near that particular class of critical area. ❑ Critical areas and BMPs are identified in the Stormwater Report. • Checklist for Stormwater Report 051909•04101/08 Sto"water Report Checklist•Page 6 of 8 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands Program Checklist for Stormwater Report Checklist (continued) Standard 7: Redevelopments and Other Projects Subject to the Standards only to the maximum extent practicable ❑ The project is subject to the Stormwater Management Standards only to the maximum Extent Practicable as a: ❑ Limited Project ❑ Small Residential Projects: 5-9 single family houses or 5-9 units in a multi-family development provided there is no discharge that may potentially affect a critical area. ❑ Small Residential Projects: 2-4 single family houses or 2-4 units in a multi-family development with a discharge to a critical area ❑ Marina and/or boatyard provided the hull painting, service and maintenance areas are protected from exposure to rain, snow, snow melt and runoff ❑ Bike Path and/or Foot Path ❑ Redevelopment Project ❑ Redevelopment portion of mix of new and redevelopment. ❑ Certain standards are not fully met(Standard No. 1, 8, 9, and 10 must always be fully met) and an explanation of why these standards are not met is contained in the Stormwater Report. • ❑ The project involves redevelopment and a description of all measures that have been taken to improve existing conditions is provided in the Stormwater Report. The redevelopment checklist found in Volume 2 Chapter 3 of the Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook may be used to document that the proposed stormwater management system (a) complies with Standards 2, 3 and the pretreatment and structural BMP requirements of Standards 4-6 to the maximum extent practicable and (b) improves existing conditions. Standard 8: Construction Period Pollution Prevention and Erosion and Sedimentation Control A Construction Period Pollution Prevention and Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan must include the following information: • Narrative; • Construction Period Operation and Maintenance Plan; • Names of Persons or Entity Responsible for Plan Compliance; • Construction Period Pollution Prevention Measures; • Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan Drawings; • Detail drawings and specifications for erosion control BMPs, including sizing calculations; • Vegetation Planning; • Site Development Plan; • Construction Sequencing Plan; • Sequencing of Erosion and Sedimentation Controls; • Operation and Maintenance of Erosion and Sedimentation Controls, • Inspection Schedule; • Maintenance Schedule; • Inspection and Maintenance Log Form. ® A Construction Period Pollution Prevention and Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan containing the information set forth above has been included in the Stormwater Report. Checklist for Sto"water Report 051909•04/01108 Storrnwater Report Checklist•Page 7 of 8 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands Program • " Checklist for Stormwater Report Checklist (continued) Standard 8: Construction Period Pollution Prevention and Erosion and Sedimentation Control (continued) ❑ The project is highly complex and information is included in the Stormwater Report that explains why it is not possible to submit the Construction Period Pollution Prevention and Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan with the application. A Construction Period Pollution Prevention and Erosion and Sedimentation Control has not been included in the Stormwater Report but will be submitted before land disturbance begins. ❑ The project is not covered by a NPDES Construction General Permit. ❑ The project is covered by a NPDES Construction General Permit and a copy of the SWPPP is in the Stormwater Report. ® The project is covered by a NPDES Construction General Permit but no SWPPP been submitted. The SWPPP will be submitted BEFORE land disturbance begins. Standard 9: Operation and Maintenance Plan ® The Post Construction Operation and Maintenance Plan is included in the Stormwater Report and includes the following information: ® Name of the stormwater management system owners, • ® Party responsible for operation and maintenance; ® Schedule for implementation of routine and non-routine maintenance tasks, ® Plan showing the location of all stormwater BMPs maintenance access areas, ® Description and delineation of public safety features; ® Estimated operation and maintenance budget; and ® Operation and Maintenance Log Form. ❑ The responsible party is not the owner of the parcel where the BMP is located and the Stormwater Report includes the following submissions: ❑ A copy of the legal instrument(deed, homeowner's association, utility trust or other legal entity) that establishes the terms of and legal responsibility for the operation and maintenance of the project site stormwater BMPs; ❑ A plan and easement deed that allows site access for the legal entity to operate and maintain BMP functions. Standard 10: Prohibition of Illicit Discharges ® The Long-Term Pollution Prevention Plan includes measures to prevent illicit discharges; • ❑ An Illicit Discharge Compliance Statement is attached; ® NO Illicit Discharge Compliance Statement is attached but will be submitted prior to the discharge of any stormwater to post-construction BMPs. Checklist for Stormwater Report 051909•04/01/08 Stormwater Report Checklist•Page 8 of 8 i OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PLAN • OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN PROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES THE RESIDENCES AT SHALLOP LANDING OCTOBER 2009 The following Operations and Maintenance Plan ("O&M")has been prepared to ensure that proposed systems function as designed. The O & M plan includes a maintenance schedule to ensure that structural and non-structural components are implemented properly and identifies the responsible parties. A brief summary of the specific BMP's to be implemented at the site are as follows: Non-Structural Methods Source Control A comprehensive source control program will be implemented at the site which includes regular pavement sweeping, catch basin cleaning and Stormceptor cleaning. Spill Prevention A spill prevention plan that includes an emergency notification plan and cleanup program will be developed as part of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Construction General Permit. At a minimum the following good housekeeping practices will be followed on-site during construction: 1. An effort will be made to store only enough product required to do the job. 2. All materials stored on-site will be kept in a neat, orderly manner in their appropriate containers and, if possible, under a roof or other enclosure. Structural Methods A. Deep Sump Catch Basins 1. During Construction a. Protect catch basins grates with hay bale check dams or silt sacks until base paving course is installed and landscaped areas are • stabilized and/or vegetated. • b. .Inspect-basins=weekor-following-rainstorms of greater than-ones inch-in-=24-hours and clean when sediment=levels=are greater-than, twelve-four_inches., 2. Long Term a. Inspect basins monthly and clean as necessary,�but-atleast-twicea` annually.-w= B. Stormceptor Unit 1. Maintain in accordance with Manufacturer's recommendations (copy follows).*The=Stormceptor Unit-shall-be=inspected at least-four-times annually-and after-any-spill event. The unit shall be maintained annually and immediately following any spill event. C. Snow Removal Snow removal and/or storage shall be conducted in accordance with the Massachusetts DEP, Resource Protection Snow Disposal Guidance, effective • March 1, 2001. Snow shall not be stockpiled on top of catch basins and shall not be dumped or pushed into resource areas. `Snow stockpile-areas shall be designated j5irior to snowfall (but not later than December 15)-with-,_orpge plastic-temporary-fencing. Snow=stockpile-areas=shall- be=cleaned of any debris=notlaternthan=May=1-5`h. .I€snow exceeds fhe on=site,,. .storage-capacity-,it-shall=be=removed=to-an approved=off=sitestockpile-location. D. Erosion Control Procedures 1. Staked hay bales, silt fence, temporary diversion swales and sediment basins shall be installed in accordance with this plan or as otherwise directed by the project engineer or the Conservation Commission prior to commencement of construction activities. Twenty additional hay bales and 100 ft. of silt fence shall be kept on site for repairs or other erosion control needs. The contractor shall inspect erosion control facilities weekly and after every rainfall event to confirm that same are properly functioning. Any deficiencies in the erosion control facilities shall be corrected immediately. 2. All soil stockpiles shall be protected against erosion utilizing erosion • control barriers and/or crushed stone filter dikes. • 3. Catch basins shall be protected with filters, as shown on the plan, until no sediment transport is visible during rainfall events. Filters shall be inspected weekly and maintained as necessary. 4. Temporary erosion control measures to be taken during construction shall conform with the "Massachusetts Erosion and Sediment Control Guidelines, Urban and Suburban Areas"dated March 1997, and may include some or all of the following measures: • Temporary seeding • Temporary mulching (straw) • Permanent seeding • Hydroseeding • Sodding • Placement of hay or jute netting during winter months • Temporary stabilization shall be accomplished in any disturbed area where activity is to cease for more than 14 days 5. Debris and/or litter shall be removed from the site on a weekly basis. 6. If dust is generated during construction, it shall be controlled by use of water trucks, sprinkling or temporary stabilization methods. 7. At the completion of the project, all disturbed areas shall be permanently stabilized with loam and seed or other ground cover. All stormwater BMP's shall be inspected and cleaned as necessary..-Paved areas-shalLbe. �swept�. E. Long Term Pollution Prevention Plan 1. Good Housekeeping a. Inspect the site weekly,pickup and properly dispose of any trash, debris or branches; b. Compost all landscape waste in an appropriate container or remove from the site to an approved waste area; C. Inspect paved areas for any signs of oil drippings and apply an absorbent agent to such immediately; d. Vacuum sweep paved areas of site at least four times annually • 2. Storage of Waste Materials Store any waste materials or recyclables in covered containers or a covered dumpster and remove such materials from the site on a regular basis, but in no case less often than weekly. 3. Vehicle Washing No vehicle washing is to be done on site other than hand washing of vehicles owned by occupants of the residences. 4. Inspect and maintain stormwater best management practices in accordance with Sections A and B of this Operation and Maintenance Plan. 5. Spill Prevention and Response: A spill prevention and response plan will be included in the NPDES S WPPP. 6. Maintenance of landscaped areas shall be done utilizing off-site personnel: Use of herbicides and pesticides shall be minimized. Low nitrogen • fertilizers will be used. Landscape maintenance supplies are not to be stored on site, except during actual landscape construction. 7. Any observed pet waste will be cleaned up immediately and disposed of with regular site trash. 8. Snow management shall be in accordance with Section C of the Operation and Maintenance Plan. F. Notification of Future Property Owners as to Requirements.for Maintenance of Stormwater System A deed restriction will be placed on any conveyance of all dwellings within the subject property referencing the requirements of this plan. G. Plan The proposed storm drainage BMP's are shown on Sheets 4-6 of the Definitive Subdivision Plan. cAn aas built plan-will-accompany the=request-for,a_E_ertif_i_ca_te-ofd, Compliance=from-the Salem_Conservation Commissions 1�W� • H. Operation and Maintenance Budget An operation and maintenance budget will be provided at the time of a request for a Certificate of Compliance. I. Illicit Discharges The following measures are proposed to prevent illicit discharges from the proposed dwellings within Shallop Landing: 1. Storm Drain(catch basin) stenciling indicating that flow is tributary to the ocean. The site plan is as referenced to in Section G of this document. The party responsible for Operation and Maintenance of the Stormwater Management Facilities is: Shallop=Landing,LLC. 2 X40-Lowell=Street" • 4.Peabody—MA=01960 xn�piJ+ - Or-its-heirs=and assigns.-, Stormceptor® Inspecti®n and Maintenance. Easy. Convenient. a:wr».x:'uxwmun:xvw'ur�auaeganxxkawrefxsa�mc�tAaawnm,..var...mhax+nrcmaomrtumas?.eanuaas.'e�aexaraavv..tmxa+w. When it rains, oils, sediment and other contaminants are captured �x. and contained by over 20,000 Stormceptor units operating =' worldwide. While Stormceptor's patented scour prevention z's:yrt technology ensures captured pollutants remain in the unit during all rainfall events, the accumulated pollutants must eventually be removed as part of a regular maintenance program. If neglected, oil and sediment gradually build up and diminish any BMP's efficiency, harming the environment and leaving owners and operators vulnerable to fines, surcharges and bad publicity. Maintenance is a must Ease, frequency and cost of maintenance are often overlooked by specifiers when considering the merits of a stormwater treatment • system.. In reality, maintenance is fundamental to the long-term Y tY, g performance of any stormwater quality treatment device. While regular maintenance is crucial, it shouldn't 'u N be complicated. An ongoing maintenance program with Stormceptor is convenient and practically effortless. With virtually no disruptions, you can concentrate on your core business. Quick inspections Inspections are easily carried out above ground from any standard surface access cover through a visual inspection of the orifice and drop tee components. A sludge judge and oil dip-stick are all that are needed.for sediment and oil depth measurements. Easy unit access Maintenance is typically conducted from the same surface access cover, eliminating the need for confined space entry into the unit. Your site remains undisturbed, saving you time and money. Imbrium No muss, no fuss and fast Maintenance is performed quickly and inexpensively with a standard vacuum truck. Servicing usually takes less than two hours, with no disruption to your site. A complete stormwater management plan for Stormceptor extends beyond installation and performance to regular maintenance. It's the smart, cost-effective way to ensure your unit continues to remove more pollutants than any other separator for decades to come. Stormceptor maintenance recommendations • Units should be inspected post-construction, prior to being put into service. • Inspect every six months for the first year of operation to determine the oil and sediment accumulation rate. • In subsequent years, inspections can be based on first-year observations or local requirements. • Cleaning is required once the sediment depth reaches 15% of storage capacity, (generally taking one year or longer). Local regulations for maintenance frequency may vary. • Inspect the unit immediately after an oil, fuel or chemical spill. • .A licensed waste management company should remove captured petroleum waste products from any oil, chemical or fuel spills and dispose responsibly. With over 20,000 units operating worldwide, Stormceptor performs and protects every day, In every storm. 'mbroum • The Vacuum Service Industry is a well-established sector of the service industry that cleans underground tanks, sewers and catch basins. Costs to clean a Stormceptoro will vary based on the size of unit and titw6ftati6n diafi uces. The depth of oil in the interceptor can be determined by inserting a dipstick tube in the 150 mm (6")oil inspection/cleanout pipe("disc"design),or in the 914 mm(36')central access way("spoor' design), or in the I00 mm(4")cleanout pipe C$Aef'design). Similarly,the depth of sediment can be measured from the surface without entry into the Storraceptor via a dipstick tube equipped with a ball valve (Sludge Judge). This tube would be inserted in the central opening(""spool" design) of iii thb 6110 ruin(24") opehft("disc" dbsi ii), 6f in thb 100 mm (4'� clbaiiout pipe Cblet" design). Maintenance should be performed once the sediment depth exceeds the guideline valim provided in Table 3. For the "spoof' design Stormceptor maintenance is performed through the large central 914 min (36'j diameter opening for both the oil and the sediment In the "disc" design, oil is removed through the 150 mm (6") oil inspection/cleanout pipe and sediment is removed through etre 610 mm (24") diameter outlet riser pipe. Alternatively, oil could be removed from the 610 mm (24') opening if water is removed from the lower chamber to lower the oil level to the level of the drop pipes. For the "inlet"design.,maintenance is performed through the 305mm(12'1 inlet drop pipe for the sediment, and oil can be removed from the 100 mm(4")oiVmspection cleanout pipe. • We recommend the following procedure to clean out the Stormceptor: 1. Chbck for oil(using a dipstick tubo) 2. Remove any ort separately using a small portable prmrp 3. Decant the water flvm the unit to the sanitary sewer using a portable pump (prior spprovai is required from the sewer authority/municipality) 4. R=ove the sludge fiom the bottom of the unit using a vacuum truck 5. Refill the Starroceptor with water where required by the local jurisdiction How Often Is Maintenance Required? Generally, annual maiojenanoe is recommended but the required n+aintenance frequencY will vary with the amount of pollution. an your site (number of hydrocarbon spills, amount of sediment, etc.). It is rwomm m&d that etre fiequeacy of mainterimue be increased or redumd based on local conditions. If the sediment load is high,maintenance may be required semi-annually. Conversely once the site has stabilized, mainttmarice may be required less frequently. Mantmance should be performed immediately after an oil spill or once the sediment depth in Stormceptor reaches the value specified in Table 3 based on the unit size. In the "disc" design and `%ice' design, any potential obstructions at the inlet can be observed from the surface. The "disc" insert has been designed as a platform to facilitate maintenance of the Stormceptor • and the storm dram system. Stormceptor • Table 2. Stormce for Ca acities Model Model Sediment Oil Total Holding (Metric) (US) Capacity Capacity Capacity L S gal L S al L S gal 300 450 1275 335 325 85 1775 470 750 900 2460 565 915 280 4325 950 1000 1200 3260 845 915 280 5125 1230 1500 1800 1 5660 1445 915 280 7525 1830 2000 2400 6150 134 2945 880 10925 2495 3000 3600 10415 2600 2945 880 15195 3750 4000 4800 1460 3475 3490 1025 20180 5020 5000 6000 18510 4550 3490 102 24635 6095 6000 7200 23445 54 4130 3100 31210 7415 IdeniMcafion Even if you do nut have plans of your Susan drain system you will be aisle to easily identifY where the inline Stormceptor units) (spool or disc insert) are since the name STORMCEPTOR is,clearly embossed on the raver. You will be able to determine the location of`Wre' StorMMTWr units with hzsriMmai mtnh basin inlets by looking down the grate since the insertwill be visible. The name Stormceptor is not • embossed on the inlet models due to the Variability of inlet grates used/approved across North America. Once you have found the unit, you may still be uncertain which model mmmber it is. Comparing the meawW depth ftw the wa&p kvel (bei of inW)to*0 bettem of the tk w th Table 1 ahouu 44CIg determine the size of the unit Starting in 1996, a metal serial number tag has been affixed to the inside of the unit The serial number has the model number written on it If the unit does not have a serial number, or if there is any uncertainty fagsrdfng tha size cf t-a6 intet66ptor using dapth ineasuiements plbma contact Staimbaptof at 1 800 565- 4801 and we will help you determine the size of a particular unit What is the Maintenance Procedure) Maintenance of Stormceptor is performed using vacuum trucks. No entry into the unit is required for maintenance of the spool insert,inlet insert or the smaller disc inserts. Entry to the level of the disc insert rite}, be regtvred fbr Servicing die larger disc inSM models. Do NOT ENTER THE STORMCEPTOR CHAMBER unless you have the proper equipment, have been trained and are qualified to enter a confined spaw,n identified by local Occupatronal Safety and Health Regulations(e.g. Canada Occupational Safety and Health Regulations — SOR/86-304). Without the proper equipment and training, eru9ry into confined spate oan result in serious bodily herrn and potentially death. Consult local, provincial, and/or state regulations to determine the requirements for confined space entry. Be aware that the insert may be slippery. In addition, be aware flat some units do not have a safety grate to cover the • outlet riser pipe that leads to the submerged,lower treatment chamber. Stormceptor Table 3. Sediment De the Indica tin Re uired Maintenance Model Model Sediment Depth etric US mm in. 300 450 200 8 750 900 200 8 1000 1200 250 10 1500 1800 375 (15) 2000 2400 300 12 3000 3600 425 (17) 4000 4800 375 (15) 5000 6000 450 18 6000. 7200 375(15) What Should I do in the Event of an()H Spill? Stcamceptor is often implemented in areas where the potential for spills is great Stonmceptor should be cleaned immediately ager a spill occurs by a licensed liquid waste hauler. You should also notify the appropriate regulatory agencies as raluired in the event of a spill. • Disposal of the Trapped Material Removed from Siormeeptor The requirements for the disposal of material from Stormceptor are similar to that of any other Best Management Practices (BMP). Local guidelines should be consulted prior to disposal of the separator contents. In most areas the sediment, once dowateted,can be disposed of in a sanitary landfill. It is not anticipated that the sediment would be classified as hazardous waste. In some areas, mixing the water with the sediment will create a slurry that can be discharged into a took sanitary sewer. In all disposal options, approval from the dsposal facility operator/agency is requited. petroleum waste products collected in Stormceptor.(oillchemical/fuel spills)should be removed by a licensed waste management company. What if I see an oil rainbow or sheen at the Stormeeptor outlet? With a steady inflax of water with high concentrations of oil,a sheen may be noticeable at the Stoanceptor outlet. This may occur because a rainbow or sheen can be seen at very small oil concentrations(<10 ppm). Stormceptor will remove over 95%of all free oil and the appearance of a sheen at the outlet with high in$uemt oil concentrations doea not mean that the.unit is not working to this level ofreaoval In addition,if the mflu>ent oil is emulsified,the Stormceptor will not be able to remove it The Stomioeptdi ie designed fou fieb oil ibfnoval and not oymiI Bed of dissolved oil conditions. Stormceptor t s Alliance Environmental Group, Inc. J 124 Mt. Auburn Street,Suite zoo North, Cambridge,MA 02138 617-492-6500 rooJefferson Boulevard, SVarwick, RI 02888 402--732-7600 March 27, 2006 Ms. Lynn Goonin Duncan, AICP Director, Planning & Community Development City of Salem 120 Washington Street, 3`d Floor Salem, MA 01970 RE: Commentary on Management of Environmental Conditions during Site Development Vacant Property 1, 3 & 3R Fort Avenue, 20 Webb Street and 4 Szetela Lane Salem, Massachusetts RTN 3-20276 AEG Project No. 1102-03 Dear Lynn: Pursuant to your request, Alliance Environmental Group, Inc. (AEG) hereby offers this Commentary on Management of Environmental Conditions during Site Development to address issues raised by you subsequent to our completion of the Response Action Outcome Statement (RAO) for your above-referenced property ("Site"). 1. REASON FOR USING SITE VALUE OF$500,000. On page 21 of the RAO, AEG assumed a value of$500,000 for the land comprising the Site. This figure was assumed by AEG to be an order of magnitude value for the Site, only for use in the required justification that reduction of contaminant levels on the Site is infeasible from an economic standpoint. This value has no relationship to its actual market or appraised value. To assist in determining whether or not reduction of contaminant levels on a property is infeasible, the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MADEP) has developed Policy#WSC-04-160, Conducting Feasibility Evaluations under the MCP, July 16, 2004. Section 3.0 of this policy, Benefit- Cost Evaluations, states that"...remedial action alternatives to achieve stated goals shall be considered feasible UNLESS: a. the incremental cost of conducting the remedial action alternative is substantial and disproportionate to the incremental benefit of risk reduction, environmental restoration, and monetary and non-pecuniary values;" By assigning an assumed order of magnitude value to the Site, AEG was able to show that the estimated $3,000,000 cost to bring the Site to background was an order of magnitude higher than the assumed value of the land and, because there is No Significant Risk to health, safety, public welfare and the environment (NSR) if the Site is managed as planned, the cost of cleanup is disproportionate to the incremental benefit of further reduction of contaminant levels. This allows the City of Salem and future owners of the Site to avoid an expensive cleanup of the contamination on the Site. 2. STATUS OF THE SITE WITH THE MADEP. At present, with the completion and submittal of the RAO, the Site presents NSR if the perimeter fence is maintained and the only humans allowed on the Site are trespassers (by default) and agents of the City of Salem who are visiting the Site for inspection purposes. An RAO is the final document filed for a disposal site under the Massachusetts Contingency Plan (MCP, 310 CMR 40.0000)that effectively "closes out' the Site with the MADEP. The RAO filed for the Site is a Class C RAO, which means that the Site has a temporary solution(the fence) that, if present conditions are maintained for the indefinite future, poses NSR. The requirements that the fence be maintained and that only agents of the City of Salem are authorized to visit the Site for inspectional purposes are memorialized at the Essex County Registry of Deeds through the mechanism of an Activity and Use Limitation (AUL). It is a requirement of the MCP that any temporary solution be reevaluated every five years to see if it is feasible to change to a permanent solution. As the contaminants at the Site are persistent in the environment, it is not expected that such a reevaluation would lead to a change from a temporary to a permanent solution for the Site in its present condition. 3. BUILDABILITY OF THE SITE IN LIGHT OF ITS ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITION. The MCP is designed so that construction on a contaminated property is permissible as long as the risks associated with contamination are managed so that receptors such as construction workers, site occupants and neighbors are protected. To this end, the MADEP has developed Policy#WSC-00-425, Construction of Buildings in Contaminated Areas, January 26, 2000. This policy mandates that such construction: • shall not be implemented without a level of understanding of the disposal site conditions and surrounding receptors sufficient to support the actions taken; • shall not be conducted in a manner that is likely to result in the exposure of surrounding human or ecological receptors to levels of oil and/or hazardous material that could pose a significant risk; • shall not prevent or impede the implementation of likely future response actions; and • shall not be conducted in a manner inconsistent with the Response Action Performance Standard. �� 2 Is i In light of this policy, construction on the Site will need to be conducted under a Site-Specific Health and Safety Plan (HASP) and Soil Management Plan (SMP). Development of the Site will need to provide a barrier to direct contact with Site contaminants that will lead to a permanent solution. 4. HOW CONSTRUCTIONIDEVELOPMENT ON THE SITE MUST BE MANAGED IN LIGHT OF ITS ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITION. As note above, construction on the Site will need to be conducted under a HASP and SMP. Otherwise, normal construction procedures will be allowed. Implementation of the HASP will require that all construction-related personnel who might come into contact with contaminated Site soils be trained in the provisions of the HASP, and that access to contaminated Site soils be restricted to persons trained in the provisions of the HASP, until such time as Site soils are covered with permanent structures (buildings, pavement or landscaping). Specifics of the HASP and SMP will involve such items as personal protective equipment (boots, gloves, eyewear and dust masks, when applicable) and dust suppression when contaminated soil is being handled. For purposes of budgeting, include $5,000 for consulting, air monitoring, etc. during the period of construction that would involve handling or disturbance of the contaminated soil on the Site. 5. DISCUSSION OF THE REGULATORY PATHWAY THAT MUST BE FOLLOWED TO ACHIEVE A PERMANENT SOLUTION UNDER THE MASSACHUSETTS CONTINGENCY PLAN, AND THE ASSOCIATED COSTS. The following steps must be taken if the Site is to be developed and a permanent solution is to be reached: 1. Final conditions at the Site after development must include a barrier to direct contact with contaminated soil over the entire Site. This can be any combination of permanent structures, such as buildings with concrete floors, hard cover such as bituminous or Portland cement pavement, or landscaping at with at least three feet of clean soil between the surface and the contaminated soil (or some lesser depth incorporating a barrier to penetration by unwary persons, such as a geotextile or geogrid). The cost of this provision will depend on the features of the proposed development, but are unlikely to add significant expense to the project. 2. A HASP and SMP must be developed before commencement of construction activities. The cost for development of the HASP and SMP would be $480. 3. A Remedial Action Measure (RAM) Plan must be developed and submitted to the MADEP by a License Site Professional (LSP), which would outline the proposed development and its goal of reaching a permanent solution for the Site. The HASP and SMP would be a part of this submittal. The cost for this RAM Plan would be $1,800. 3 4. Within 120 days of submittal of the RAM Plan, and every 6 months thereafter, until the construction of the barrier to direct contact is complete (completion of the Site construction does not have to be complete, only the portion of the construction that constitutes the barrier to direct contact with the contaminated soil), a RAM Status Report must be generated and submitted to the MADEP by an LSP. For an 18-month construction process for the barrier to direct contact, this would require as many as three RAM Status Reports. The cost for these three reports would be $4,450. 5. Upon completion of the barrier to direct contact, a RAM Completion Report must be generated and submitted to the MADEP by an LSP. The cost for this report would be $2,400. 6. Upon closure of the RAM, the existing AUL would need to be terminated and a new AUL generated and recorded at the Essex County Registry of Deeds for the Site. The cost for these tasks, including all public notices and fees, would be $5,200. 7. Concurrently with implementing the AUL, an MCP Method 3 Risk Assessment would need to be performed for the new Site conditions, and a permanent solution reached in the form of a Class A-3 RAO (a Class A-3 RAO is reserved for sites where contamination is still present, but where NSR is maintained through the implementation of an AUL), which would have to be prepared by an LSP and submitted to the MADER The cost for these tasks would be $9,600. The total additional costs are estimated at this time to be $28,930, not including minor added costs of construction and the cost for any off-Site disposal of contaminated soil (if required by the construction plans, which is highly unlikely and not required). I trust the above fulfills your requirements. Please call me if you have any questions. Very truly yours, Alliance Environmental Group, Inc. Mi . Geisser, PE, LSP ncipal 4 Professional Land Surveyors &Civil Engineers ESSEX SURVEY SERVICE 1958- 1986 OSBORN PALMER 1911 . 1970 BRADFORD&WEED 1885- 1972 . December 29,2009 Mr. David Knowlton,P.E. City Engineer 120 Washington Street, 4s`Floor Salem,MA 01970 RE: F 14611 SHALLOP LANDING SALEM, MA Dear Mr. Knowlton: Pursuant to our meeting of December 9 and 23, 2009 and memoranda dated December 9 and December 17,2009,the following modifications and/or additions have been made to the Definitive Subdivision Plans and supplemental documentation for the referenced project. Dminase 1. A_tide_gate_is_no-w specified=on-Sheet8-of_the revised Plan. 2. rX-d--etail-of pioposed:riprap at the outlet of-the-24-inch_drain has been-added to-theme Plan.• 3. The Stormceptor has been relocated_to_the intersection of Shallop Lane and-Szetela== Lane? 4. Additional grading detail, piping and catch basins have been added along the southwest lot line. Piping detail for roof drains has been added to Sheet 5 of the revised Plan. A new drain manhole is proposed on the existing 12 inch drain in Fort Avenue. 5. New scour,calculations.which include inflows from land northeast of Lee Fort Terrace are provided in the revised Stormwater Report. 104 LOWELL STREET PEABODY, MASS. 01960 TELEPHONE: 978-531-8121 FAX: 978-531-5920 Water Sunoly 1. The vertical alignment of the water main from Fort Avenue to Shallop Lane has been revised such that the high point has been relocated to a point opposite the new hydrant. 2. The Planning Board voiced strong concerns as to the master water meter pit; that matter will be left to the Board and the City Engineer to resolve. 3. The size of the existing main on Fort Avenue has been corrected to be 16 inches. 4. Proposed water services have been added to Sheets 5 and 6 of the Definitive Plan. Sanitary Sewer 1. The manhole at Station 12 & 33 has been replotted; stationing of that manhole is at a right angle offset to the centerline,thus the 8 foot difference in station length vs. actual length. 2. The Developer will bear the expense of television camera inspection of the Fort Avenue sewer from the manhole opposite Lots 14 and 15 to the manhole at Fort Avenue and Lee Fort Terrace. The matter of the cost of any correction of existing deficiencies will be responded to by the Developer. 3. The existing sewer connection from Fort Avenue to the site has been redrafted on Sheet Y(o 4. Proposed sewer services have been added to Sheet 5 and 6 of the revised Plan. Other 1. The buffer zone has been replotted to be 100 feet from the top of the coastal bank. 2. The easement from Fort Avenue to Shallop Lane has been widened to 25 feet. 3. Notations as to the proposed filling of the existing 60 inch drain have been added to Sheet Yof the revised Plan. 5 4. Supplemental calculations for the new 24 inch drain outlet which include flows from Lee Fort Avenue and the school are provided in the updated Stormwater Report. Ba�340lirill �a©d �Op�O� ��a0otl�4oi3o �©Oo L II. Review of proposed roof drain along the eastern edge of the Development. 1. Roof drains for Lots 1-13 are directed into Shallop Lane 2. A notation as to screened gutters has been added to Sheet 5 of the Plan. 3. A new retaining wall detail is shown on Sheet 6 of the Plan 4. Revised calculations for watershed EP are provided in the updated Stormwater Report. IllnReview-of Planning Board=concern=with adjacent property drainage with respect to ,the-retaining wall on both sidesi 1. Please see revised drainage design and updated calculations. 2. Please see revised drainage analysis and calculations. 3. Please see revised drainage calculations. 4. Please see revised calculations. As to the waiver of Standard 2 (runoff attenuation) it is understood to be purely a waiver, regardless of the alterations from existing to proposed conditions. Also, please note that the site was observed during the rainstorm event of December 26- 27,2009. Puddling occurring on Salem Housing Authority property to the east of Lots 1 and 2 was not observed to extend onto the side of the proposed subdivision. A sketch of a proposed solution to that problem which could be pursued by the Housing Authority accompanies this letter. Please direct any questions relative to this response to the undersigned, Christopher R. Mello,P.L.S. or Clayton A. Morin, P.E. Very truly yours, J s H. MacDowe JHM;Ic cc: Salem Planning Board Attorney John R. Keilty Mr. Phillip Singleton G��3Qor�i1 G�a©d �apoo� o�aoo��Qoi3o X3000 ' >, • ►� o�FS - St� o.... Gp 1,.caa , aS $JT3o ,v\St� ►- .4 -200 jara �.____-__ _�_a_g—co�..a �to-J or_-[c o__�?��.e�-►.cra � esttiS oao _— ax - --------- _-__.__- - ---____._ S�_e_l �.�.+r�-�Fas�_�Ea_4F___.�r_^P�o'�___. -\•Jav�A---S-�E._ _-___------ =1�b mt4T i-v-e _._�os9 a._-+�oJSaQ.c�-.__ -on tA-0-n_3,k ..�5 _._ d'sY_____\E-.Rf€__ I'I _—_------___-__ ' ��►��_�2��e_*�° __L,o�E---w�.��-._ -w F._._�ks�P��a.�—_c��___----- _.__________..- -___. `AJLo�k�_.xn��.� ..-G..•1.-.. _.pc RE=..g._..._ �� _ _'rvr .,..._.._.1orc�y.--`'J��----- _ -___. -...__. - ----- - - - _-__ _ C.-J_p_��zt il� ---Tut_.._, _eJe.w 'onA•ni �cF-. . g ,��F-w\� _T�A�_ .- . . ----.___ -A1�S___J_�?cc ft 4c � OGF --------- Tol - ........ --m—I--Zrs;3 -- ----------- -------------- M - 0; --2 zF 7-1-;(20 p OSS —.17YT75 14- 4\-Qp_ !S 1777.4e. 3A— f CITY OF SALEM It -ut DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND Kii\BERLEY DRISCOLL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MAYOR 7nno T -8 A 9 120 WASHINGTON STREET ♦ SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970 LYNN GOONIN DUMC�N,AICP T$LY IL F ;{ : 978-619-5685♦ FAX: 978-740-04041 T Y CL ;. DIRECTOR LFA•+„ �1 September 24, 2008 Decision Petition of SHALLOP LANDING AT COLLINS COVE PARTNERSHIP,LLC requesting variances from minimum lot area, lot width,depth of front yard,width of side yard, and depth of rear yard to construct fifteen single family residences on land between SZETELA LANE and FORT AVENUE, Salem. City of Salem Zoning Board of Appeals A public hearing on the above petition was opened on September 17, 2008 pursuant to Massachusetts General Law Ch. 40A, Sec. 11. The following Zoning Board members were present: Richard Dionne,Annie Harris, Elizabeth Debski,Annie Hams,and James Tsisinos. The petitioner, Shallop Landing At Collins Cove Partnership, LLC. sought variances from minimum lot area, lot width,depth of front yard,width of side yard and depth of rear yard to construct fifteen(15)single family residences on land between Szetela Lane and Fort Avenue, Salem in the Residential Two Family(R-2)zoning district. The Board of Appeals, after carefid consideration of the evidence presented at the public hearing, and after thorough review of the Petition submitted,makes the following findings of fact: 1. Petitioner responded to an RFP issued by the City of Salem for the aforementioned parcel of land owned by the City. 2. The site consists of approximately 2.4 acres and is currently vacant and undeveloped. 3. The petitioner was requesting dimensional relief from the Zoning Ordinance, which would result in the creation of fifteen (15) single family house lots. 4. Thirteen of the lots would have access to Szetela Lane by way of a creation of a private way. The remaining two lots would have direct access on Fort Avenue. 5. These parcels are located in Two Family(R-2) Residential Zone. 6. Pursuant to the Salem Zoning Ordinance, a Two Family Residential Zone in Salem requires a minimum lot area of 15,000 square feet, a minimum lot area per dwelling of 7,500 square feet, and a minimum of 100 feet of frontage.See Salem Zoning Ordinance, Article VI. 7. The RFP issued by the City of Salem notes that due to the unique shape of the parcel that the Administration would be supportive of modest variances that would result in the development of between ten(10)and fifteen(15)dwelling units. 8. The parcel is on contaminated soil, due to decades of industrial use on the property. Removal of such waste is uneconomical as determined by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection and allows the Petitioner to cap the parcel with between two(2) and three(3)feet of soil. 9. Several members of the public spoke in opposition to the petition, due to the density of the project, drainage concerns, and potential impacts to existing ocean views. 10. Letter introduced from Ms. Amity VanDoren, resident of I Essex St, Salem, favoring her support for the petition,because of the developer's community involvement and it would solve some much needed problems in that area. On the basis of the above findings of fact,including all evidence presented at the public hearing, including, but not limited to,the Petition the Zoning Board of Appeals concludes as follows: 1. The petitioner's request from minimum lot area, lot width, depth of front yard, width of side yard, and depth of rear yard does not constitute substantial detriment to the public good and will not negatively impact the public's safety. 2. The requested variances do not nullify or substantially derogate from the intent or purpose of the zoning ordinance. 3. A literal enforcement of the zoning ordinance would create a substantial hardship to the petitioner. 4. In permitting such change,the Board of Appeals requires certain appropriate conditions and safeguards as noted below. In consideration of the above,the Salem Board of Appeals voted, four(4)in favor (Debski,Harris, Dionne, Tsisinos)and one(1)opposed(Belair)to grant the variances from minimum lot area, lot width, depth of front yard, width of side yard, and depth of rear yard, subject to the following terms, conditions,and safeguards: 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes,ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted to and approved by the Building Commissioner. 3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. 4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to beginning any construction. 5. A Certificate of Occupancy is to be obtained. 6. Petitioner shall obtain numbering from the City of Salem Assessor's Office and Shall display said number so as to be visible from the street. 7. Petitioner is to obtain approval from any City Board or Commission having jurisdiction including,but not limited to,the Planning Board 8. That the City Engineer shall review and approve the drainage plans. izabe ebski Salem Z6ning Board of Appeals A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision,if any,shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A,and shall be filed within 20 days of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A,Section 11,the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certificate of the City clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed,or that,if such appeal has been filed,that it has been dismissed or denied and is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Carey Duques From: John R. Keilty, Esquire [keiltylaw@verizon.net] Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2009 9:02 AM To: Danielle McKnight Cc: Carey Duques Subject: Fwd: Land Off Fort Ave., Salem, MA Danielle, Attached herewith is authorization from the Livingston/Sheffer's Attorney with regard to applications before the Planning Board and Conservation Commission. John R. Keilty, Esquire Law Office of John R. Keilty 40 Lowell Street Peabody, MA 01960 Tel: (978) 531-7900 Fax: (978) 531-2479 E-Mail: Keiltylaw@verizon.net The information transmitted in this message is confidential and may be privileged. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, or other use of this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify Keilty Law Office immediately - by replying to this message or by sending an email to Keiltylaw@verizon.net and destroy all copies of this informati on, including any attachments, without reading or disclosing them. Thank you. Nov 2, 2009 05:42:06 PM, waynehscott@msn.com wrote: Dear Mr. Keilty: As you know, I represent David Livingston and Betsy Sheffer, the descendants of Abraham Livingston, the last record grantee of the roughly trapezoidal parcel of land shown as "Owner or Owners Unknown" on a plan recorded at the Essex South Registry of Deeds as Plan 174 of 1980 (the "Parcel") . My clients have reached an agreement in principle to convey directly or indirectly their interest in the Parcel to Shallop Landing at Collins Cove Partnership, LLC ("Shallop Landing") . Accordingly, in the expectation that a mutually satisfactory resolution of the details of the proposed transaction can be reached in the near future, my clients consent _ to the inclusion of the Parcel in Shallop Landing's application to the City of Salem Planning Board. Wayne H. Scott No virus found in this incoming message. _ Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8. 5.423 / Virus Database: 270.14.45/2476 - Release Date: 11/02/09 07:51:00 1 PURCHASE and SALE AGREEMENT 1. PARTIES: This 2V ti- day of March,2009 H&H Propeller Shop,Inc.,a Massachusetts corporation with a principal place of business at Zero Essex Street, Salem,Massachusetts,hereinafter called the"SELLER", agrees to sell and Shallop Landing at Collins Cove Partnership,LLC of 209 Essex Street,2'u Floor, Salem,Massachusetts,hereinafter called the"BUYER or PURCHASER",agrees to Buy, upon the terms hereinafter set forth, the following described premises: 2. DESCRIPTION: That certain area of land being shown as Lot I on a plan recorded at the Essex South District Registry of Deeds as Plan 174 of 1980 and being also shown on Assessor's Map 41,Lot 274. Being a portion of the premises described in a Deed to the Grantor recorded at the Essex South District Registry of Deeds in Book Page62 3. BUILDINGS, 'Land Only. ��TT STRUCTURES, IMPROVEMENTS, FIXTURES: 4. TITLE DEED: Said premises are to be conveyed by a good and sufficient QUITCLAIM deed running to the BUYER,or to the nominee designated by the BUYER by written notice to the SELLER at least seven days before the deed is to be delivered as herein provided, and said deed shall convey a good and clear record and marketable title thereto, free from encumbrances,except (a) Provisions of existing building and zoning laws; (b) Existing rights and obligations in party walls which are not the subject.of written agreement; (c) Such taxes for the then current year are as not due and payable on the date of the delivery of such deed; (d) Any liens for municipal betterments assessed after the date of this agreement; (c) Any easement,restriction or agreement of record presently in force and applicable which do not interfere with the reasonable use of the premises as now used; (fl 5. PLANS: If said deed refers to a plan necessary to be recorded therewith,the SELLER shall deliver such plans with the deed in form adequate for recording or registration. 6. REGISTERED In addition to the foregoing,if the title to said premises is registered,said deed shall be in TITLE: in form sufficient to entitle the BUYER to a Certificate of Title of said premises, and the SELLER shall deliver with said deed all instruments, if any,necessary to enable the BUYER to obtain such Certificate of Title. 7. PURCHASE The agreed purchase price of said premises is Ninety Thousand and 001100 PRICE: ($90,000.00)Dollars, of which $ 5,000.00 to be paid with the signing of this Purchase and Sale Agreement $85,000.00 is to be paid at the time of the delivery of the deed in cash,bank or certified checks. $90,000.00 TOTAL 8. TIME FOR See Additional Provisions PERFORMANCE: DELIVERY OF DEED 9. EXTENSION TO If the SELLER shall be unable to give title or to make conveyance,or to deliver PERFECT TITLE possession of the premises,all as herein stipulated,or if at the time of delivery of OR MAKE the deed the premises do not conform with the provisions thereof,the SELLER PREMISES shall use reasonable efforts to remove any defects in title,or to deliver possession CONFORM as provided herein,or to make the said premises conform to the provisions hereof, as the case may be,in which event the SELLER shall give written notice thereof to the BUYER at or before the time for performance hereunder,and thereupon the time for performance hereof shall be extended for a period of thirty(30)days. 10. FAILURE TO If at the expiration of the extended time the SELLER shall have failed so to PERFECT TITLE remove any defects in title, deliver possession, or make the premises conform,as OR MAKE the case may be,all as herein agreed, or if at any time during the period of this PREMISES agreement or any extension thereof,the holder of a mortgage on said premises CONFORM,etc. shall refuse to permit the insurance proceeds, if any,to be used for such purposes, then,at the BUYER'S option,any payments made under this agreement shall be forthwith refunded and all other obligations of all parties hereto shall cease and this agreement shall be void without recourse to the parties hereto. 11. BUYER'S The BUYER shall have the election,at either the original or any extended time ELECTION TO for performance,to accept such title as the SELLER can delivery to the said ACCEPT TITLE premises in their then condition and to pay therefor the purchase price without deduction,in which case the SELLER shall convey such title,except that in the event of such conveyance in accord with the provisions of this clause. 12. ACCEPTANCE The acceptance of a deed by the BUYER or his nominee as the case may be,shall OF DEED: be a full performance in discharge and release of every agreement and obligation herein contained or expressed,except such as are,by the terms hereof, to be performed after the delivery of said deed. 13. USE OF To enable the SELLER to make conveyance as herein provided, the SELLER may PURCHASE at the time of delivery of the deed,use the purchase money or any portion thereof MONEY TO to clear the title of any or all encumbrances or interests,provided that all CLEAR TITLE: instruments so procured are recorded simultaneously with the delivery of said deed, or within a reasonable time thereafter in accordance with standard conveyancing practices. I 14. INSURANCE: Until the delivery of the deed,the SELLER shall maintain insurance on said premises as follows Type oflnsurance Coverage (a) First and Extended Coverage As presently insured 15. ADJUSTMENTS: Water and sewer use charges,if any, and taxes for the current year,shall be apportioned as of the day of performance of this agreement and the net amount thereof shall be added to or deducted from,as the case may be,the purchase price payable by the BUYER at the time of delivery of the deed. 16. ADJUSTMENT OF If the amount of said taxes is not known at the time of delivery of the deed, they UNASSESSED shall be apportioned on the basis of the taxes assessed for the preceding year, AND ABATED with a reapportionment as soon as the new tax rate and valuation can be TAXES: ascertained;and,if the taxes which are to be apportioned shall thereafter be reduced by abatement,the amount of such abatement, less the reasonable cost of obtaining the same,shall be apportioned between the parties,provided that neither party shall be obligated to institute or prosecute proceedings for an abatement unless herein otherwise agreed. 17. BROKERS)FEE: The parties warrant to each other that neither party has dealt with a Real Estate Broker and no commission is due to any party. 18. BROKER(S) Intentionally Deleted. WARRAN'T'Y: 19. DEPOSIT: All deposits made hereunder shall be held,in escrow,by Jacob Segal,Esquire,as agent for the SELLER,subject to the terms of this agreement and shall be duly accounted for at the closing. 20. BUYER'S If the BUYER shall fail to fulfill the BUYER'S agreements herein, all deposits DEFAULT made hereunder by the BUYER shall be retained by the SELLER as liquidated DAMAGES: damages and this shall be the SELLER's sole and exclusive remedy at law or in equity. 21. FINANCING: Intentionally deleted. 22. NOTICE: Intentionally Deleted. 23. LIABILITY OF If the SELLER or BUYER executes this agreement in a representative or TRUSTEES, fiduciary capacity,only the principal or the estate represented shall be bound and SHAREHOLDER, neither SELLER or BUYER so executing,nor any shareholder or beneficiary of BENEFICIARY,etc any trust,shall be personally liable for any obligation,express or implied hereunder. 24. CONSTRUCTION This instrument is to be construed as a Massachusetts contract, is to take effect as OF AGREEMENT: a sealed instrument,sets forth the entire contract between the parties, is binding upon and enures to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective heirs, devisees,executors, administrators, successors and assigns,and may be canceled, modified or amended only by a written instrument executed by both the SELLER and the BUYER. If two or more persons are named herein as BUYER their obligations hereunder shall be joint and several. The captions and marginal notes are used only as a matter of convenience and are not to be considered a part of this agreement or to be used in determining the intent of the parties to it. This is a legally binding contract. If not understood, seek competent advice. 25. WARRANTIES The BUYER acknowledges that he has not relied upon any warranties or AND representations not incorporated in this agreement,except for the following REPRESENTATION warranties and representations,if any, made by either the SELLER or the Broker: ACKNOWLEDGE- MENT: None. 26. ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS: (a) This Agreement is conditioned upon and contingent upon the purchase of certain land surrounding the subject premises owned by the City of Salem. (b) This Agreement is further subject to the receipt and approval of all permits, variances and approvals necessary to develop the property in accordance with a plan entitled,"Definitive Subdivision Plan,The Residences at Shallop Landing, Salem,Massachusetts,Prepared for Shallop Landing,LLC,prepared by Easter Land Survey Associates,Inc. dated June 5,2008". (c) The Time for Performance shall be 90 days after obtaining all necessary approvals from the City of Salem and the expiration of any appeal period of a certain plan entitled, "Definitive Subdivision Plan,The Residences at Shallop Landing, Salem, Massachusetts,Prepared for Shallop Landing,LLC,prepared by Eastern Land Survey Associates,Inc.dated June 5,2008"and the delivery of necessary deeds from the City of Salem. In the event that the City of Salem has not conveyed the property to the Buyer within the aforementioned 90 day period,then the performance shall be within 45 days following the delivery of the Deed from the City of Salem to the Buyer,but no later than December 29,2009. (d) As additional consideration,the Buyer shall either convey to or grant an easement over a certain area of land shows as Parcel B containing 8,242 square feet on a plan entitled,"Definitive Subdivision Plan,The Residences at Shallop Landing, Salem,Massachusetts,Prepared for Shallop Landing,LLC,prepared by Eastern Land Survey Associates,Inc. dated June 5, 2008". The choice of whether the delivery of a deed or easement shall rest with the Seller set forth in Paragraph#1 and the area shall be paved in accordance with the construction detail attached hereto and fenced. See Rider B for specifications with respect to the construction of the parking lot, (e) The parties hereto agree that Parcel B is currently owned by the City of Salem. (f) The Deed or Easement shall restrict the use of Parcel B to parking for employees of the Seller,H&H Propeller Shop,Inc.,and vehicles of the Seller to include vans of up to 9,000 lbs. gross weight. Storage or parking for vehicles such as boats,trailers,or product of the Seller, lobster traps or trucks of the Seller shall be prohibited. (g) The Buyer shall provide lighting to the parking area and the area shall be fenced and gated. I have received a copy of the Purchase and Sale Agreement. This is a legally binding contract. If not understood,seek competent advice. Shallop Landing at Col ' Cove Partnership H P p le S gyp,I c.—Seller LL er By: , sy at Coll Jo on A.Pelletier,President --"w� By: 4?0 ewflan-mirtin'Trefisurer RIDER A TO PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN H&H PROPELLER SHOP,INC.("SELLER") AND SHALLOP LANDING AT COLLINS COVE PARTNERSHIP,LLC ('BUYER") PROPERTY AT o26 I N 6� O/ SALEM,MASSACHU ETTS 31. Notice. Whenever notice is given or required to be given by either of the parties hereto to the other, it shall be deemed to have been given,when in writing and mailed by certified or registered mail,return receipt requested, hand-delivered,or by facsimile transmission: if to SELLER to: H&H Propeller,Inc. Zero Essex Street Salem,MA 01970 with a copy to: Jacob S. Segal,Esquire Ronan,Segal&Harrington 59 Federal Street Salem,MA 01970 Tel: (978)744-0350 Fax:(978)744-7493 Email: 'ss ronansesal.com if to BUYER to: Shallop Landing at Collins Cove Partnership,LLC 209 Essex Street,2°d Floor Salem,MA 01970 with a copy to: Sohn R. Keilty,Esquire 40 Lowell Street Peabody,MA 01960 Tel: (978) 531-7900 Fax: (978) 531-2479 Email: keiltvlawna.aol.com or to such other address as either party shall have last designated by like notice in writing. Notices given hereunder shall be effective upon receipt, in the case of notices given by hand or facsimile transmission,and the earlier of the date of receipt or the first attempted delivery, in the case of notices given by certified mail. SELLERS INITIALS BUYER'S INITIALS 'e! 9 SELLER'S INITIALS F:\zzzztSINGLETON-SZETELA LANE,SALEM,MA\PURCHASE&SALEAGREEMENT-H&HPROPELLER,INC.(FINALIZED3-3-09).duc RIDER B TO PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN H& H PROPELLER SHOP,INC. ("SELLER") AND SHALLOP LANDING AT COLLINS COVE PARTNERSHIP,LLC ("BUYER") PROPERTY AT Xo 7 &j�:�poz'5�-/ SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS The specifications in constructing the parking area referred to in Article 26 (d) shall be as follows: 1. All soft loam(dirt, organic material) shall be removed down to 16" 2. 12" of processed stone shall be added and compressed; 3. 2%z"binder shall be added; 4. 1'/2"of finished hot top shall be added; and 5. Parking spaces shall be lined. I� bPs9P1D(Tgga� �r CITY OF SALEM CONSERVATION COMMISSION SITE VIISIT1' FORM PROJECT LOCATION: �Q 5haon LarAt�r DATE OF SITE VISIT I to PROJECT PROPONENT: A LLC- EP FILE NUMBER: �C4'Ygy PROPOSED WORK: l -LIALMA2lvt nae 1 CAIA40A 64h n a t, 4 INw'TiENL1ANC E m Commission Member's/Agent: Abutters: Applicant/Property Owner/Representative: �ia�KhrCjM . kxll 2i..l ❑Request for Determination ❑Abbreviated Notice of Resource Area Delineation Notice of Intent ElCertificate of Compliance El Enforcement/Violation ❑Emergency ❑ Informal _AR�#IS.��JURISPICT#OI�►> � - _' _ INLAND RESOURCE AREAS COASTAL RESOURCE AREAS ❑Bank ❑ Land Subject to Coastal ❑Land Under the Ocean 111 Storm Flowage ❑Bordering Vegetated Wetland ❑ Designated Port Area ❑Coastal Beach ❑Land Subject to Flooding ❑ Coastal Dune ❑Barrier Beach ❑Land Under Water Bodies or Waterway Name: 0 Coastal Bank ❑Rocky Intertidal Shore ❑Riverfront Area ❑ Salt Marsh ❑ Land Under Salt Pond c Vernal Pools ❑ Land Containing ❑Anadromous/Cata- Shellfish dromous Fish Run ❑ Bordering Vegetated Wetland in Coastal Area I BU �I.ZON� witlit lOEPeetj' HWater Body ❑ Bordering Vegetated Wetland Bank ❑ Coastal Beach ❑Coastal Dune =:ENTERESTSIRRQTECLE� :. ; I ❑Protection of Water Supply t❑ Protection of Groundwater Supply Flood Control i3Storm Damage Prevention Prevention of Pollution ❑Protection of Fisheries ❑ Protection of Wildlife Habitat (`❑Protection of Land Containing Shellfish Is this an exempt project: If so,why? Are resource area boundaries delineated correctly? If not,explain. Art�IqsrrDOGt1N1ENTATION Photos ❑ Site Map ❑Other: Take into account relevant aspects or features such as: natural or piped drainage or obvious pollution; topography; existing vegetation; possible alternative sites; signs of wildlife, possible vernal pools, rare species habitat; landmarks; recent or historical disturbances; proximity to other water bodies or drainage areas; adjacent land uses. C � 'ho,n,C ar'oc1'�t �� :..o rot �� o,l •, '� :� ��, nv.��e�. � a�tgi-�A1, uncxo�'e.A_ ��n�¢>�;lR �lk.�Oc�c. �a��._e� .PXt�t�wt r�0 Yi,LD ctiLNla MC"K cL hA Ql1 l FLAP VALVES GENERAL DIMENSIONS KENNEDY VALVE L d P i H M o\ O J /� .o N 9 End Flanged View End F-3012 DIMENSIONS - INCHES VALVESIZE-INCHES 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 24 30 B FACE OF SEAT TO FACE OF FLANGE 4 6 8 8 8 10 10 10 10 10 10 H DIAMETER OF END OF FLANGE 9 11 13-1/2 16 19 21 23-1/2 25 27-1/2 32 38-3/4 1 THICKNESS OF END FLANGE 3/4 7/8 1 1 1-1/8 1-1/4 1-1/4 1-1/4 1-3/8 1-1/2 1-1/2 J DIAMETER OF BOLT CIRCLE 7-1/2 9-1/2 11-3/4 14-1/4 17 18-3/4 21-1/4 22-3/4 25 29-1/2 36 K NUMBER OF SIZE OF BOLTS 8-5/8 8-3/4 8-3/4 12-7/8 12-7/8 12-1 16-1 16-1-1/8 20-1-1/8 20-1-1/4 20-1-1/4 L DIAMETER OF FLAP PIN(BRONZE) 5/8 5/8 5/8 3/4 3/4 7/8 7/8 7/8 1 1 1-1/4 M DIAMETER OF FLAP LUG HOLE 5/8 5/8 5/8 3/4 1 3/4 1 7/8 7/8 1 7/8 1 1 1 1 Kennedy Valve / Flap / Shear Gate Valves 18-3 Updated 11/13/09 SUGGESTED SPECIFICATIONS KENNEDY VALVE FLAP VALVES KENNEDY VALVE Flap valves shall be of the circular port design with offset single pivoted hinge. They shall be of the iron body bronze mounted type and furnished with (flanged end, spigot end, hub end or as called for in the specifications or as indicated on plans). The assembly shall consist of three parts: flap gate, body and hinge pin. The flap gate and body shall be case iron conforming to ASTM specifications A0126 Class B. The seats and hinge pin shall be furnished of bronze. The flap gate seat ring shall be rolled into a dove-tailed groove under pressure to make one inseparable unit. The body seat ring shall be threaded and screwed into place in the body. Both gate and body seat ring faces shall be machined to a smooth finish. Valves shall be manufactured by Kennedy Valve or approved equal. 18-4 Kennedy Valve I Flap I Shear Gate Valves Updated 11113109 KENNEDY VALVE FLAP VALVES, IBBM KENNEDY VALVE Size Range Working Pressure 4"-30" Valves unseat and swing open under unseating pressure to release the outfall fluid and close when pressure is relieved Available End Connections & Size Range Figure No. Flanged End 4"-30" F-3012 Accessories None Kennedy Valve / Flap / Shear Gate Valves 18-1 Updated 11/13/09 FLAP VALVES TYPICAL CROSS-SECTION AND PARTS LIST KENNEDY VALVE FIG F-3012 Bronze Hinge Pin Babbit Cast Iron Body Cast Iron Flap Flap Seat Ring Bronze Body Seal Ring Bronze 18-2 Kennedy Valve I Flap I Shear Gate Valves Updated 11/13/09 L r�F u ( yr� Y t F t t � r- - vu 4�• Fk f P F y 4 it. '* f S W. "�� t i •1" �'L 'Y 4 �iAt/'l' f �Ar r City of S Feet Collins C 0 125 250 500 "FR ^t ��✓ 77 X _ r ,r w 4 r. _ - R v gcc -1 s ; ay e A C ' -r r' f roeI � r G, rr o Q s r 1F 4 x1mf MA N i Outfalls n ' Print Date: December 3, 2009 /V °T Professional Land Surveyors &Civil Engineers ESSEX SURVEY SERVICE 1958- 1986 OSBORN PALMER 1911 - 1970 BRADFORD&WEED 1885- 1972 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT THE RESIDENCES AT SHALLOP LANDING SZETELA LANE AND FORT AVENUE SALEM, MA 01970 OCTOBER 2009 REVISED DECEMBER 29,_2009 Owner/Applicant: Shallop Landing, LLC 40 Lowell Street Peabody, MA 01960 Engineer: Clayton A. Morin,P.E. 30969 (Mass.) Eastern Land Survey Associates, Inc. 104 Lowell Street Peabody, MA 01960 A �ytH OF CLA G� IL v, 30969 OlSY@Q� BfONA1. 104 LOWELL STREET PEABODY, MASS. 01960 TELEPHONE: 978-531-8121 FAX: 978-531-5920 STANDARD 1 SCOUR/EROSION ANALYSIS EASTERN LAND SURVEY ASSOCIATES, INC. JOB Christopher R. Mello PLS SHEET NO. OF 104 Lowell Street CALCULATED BY DATE PEABODY, MA 01960 (978) 5531.8121 CHECKED BY DATE SCALE I I � p . I i . I I . � I I_ .-7 { it i } i_. I�'`. ,. ..i_ _ j i_.. j 1 i. ..r i.... I 1 1 I i I .. . $t a,at t r.Ctsr1 PQlael 3 ' S �']!, T'.i4$ �� P .,—►2,�1,� [t i I 1 I } -.....{ . }. _........... v ,rR!3 o f —S .e-13 4 N c a j . i stc ,+ z NA A_.�.. . zi►+� � _.._T. - I To�.�o W�tel_. e,l._c�..S3. e, rc ura cS' . C ........I f�._. ......... ems. - ' 7I -o �f �a ........... _._._'_._... _. S"'S'c -- - 1- 1� 2.; "i , t..._.......t. �_.. ....i -._. . - '- - - —....i.. - -' - —'- -- ............ ; h � � t - - _.., - I W.till cia .... �?V. _1 gwv7. _E.SL4..S�nI I .] � o e t 1 D TZ c P ._ ' 1! C3... _ . t 'a S S. .4.'1...Qe.. . . ;1 T C it i.. I I ' I i I i I I {{ ! I I 1 j ; 1 a..._. __ i ! ! I I -i- I ......p.__ f•:_...i. . t r .. ..z.. A.........., _..1 .. r ..i. _._ 1 j L ...; t I .. i i f i i i I i I ii. ; ! I ._ ....:..._.4... a. .+_. .� ..+ . } ! _ ! .....a 1 I - . _ I l ._.....}.... 1 } 1 .7 -i _....«. 4 {.. t ....... ! I }._ ,.. ..: - ! 4 j I ' 1 '... 1 I I !. .�.. ' ...... L I i J ....._.... ... .. ......I_ I... ._ { . .. ... _ i .. ...}. _ 1. r ...____ . .._ .. ... ..._... 1..... . ..... t ..... .i... 1 _._ .. :.__ i.. iT ( i.. -"j-" PIPED DRAINAGE FACILITIES ANALYSIS fff ..........I.......... .......... ........... .................................... .......-I-. ...... ......... ............ ............. STORM ...... ........ ............ -4............ ......... ....... ...... ......... E M �uRat lk'14 DI SIC N TO Based upon m Rat oriAlor ............... t CA ................ ....... ............. .................... ........... ............. ...... .. ......... ........... ............ I rri 0 ............. -------------l! -t.r.-'--4.-.- I j I I ...... .... ... ..................... 13M.RUNDFV, -a moo Co 0 4�M ..... ....... ... . ......... . ...... .... ...... L4 19 .......... il-!.IFU to .......... ............ .. ................. .. U2 CID 0 A ............ ........ ...... .........- - - - ................. z! IM ..... ......... ... .......... ......... ---------- - ... ....... Ln FPS Acres A&eg, quates S .4 . ..... filp . ......(6 . . I I.....--.I- A *m. ---- cA .......... ......... ...... . ................. ......... ..........$...- .......... CO ...... o . 5L . ........ ............. . ......... ........ .16, p.............. ........ J� .4. .... ........ ... .. ......... ......... ------- r . ... .... .1 O . ...... ..... 14 .. ...... .. - ... -E,* ........... .......... .................... ...... ............ ............................... ............... ...... ....... ..........- L. .................... .......... ......... .... ............ t O. ........ .—------ ............ ....... -9 ............ ......................... .......... ...................... ......................J- ..... ............I ................ i6i is-i C-LLfb Lpwox- f - - i.......... ................................. M Based upon Rat o For D TOF *Ul .................. ................... ........... ........... ........... .............. .............. d:LA-1 ......... .......... ....j. COMPUTAT .... ale ...... ................. ....... ... PEAK R170FIl" . ..........- o X-, IC ION t-J 01, ........... - ............ 9F F MANHOLE MANHOLE ................... .- .. .........- . ............... ............ ............. . ...... ............ --- ----- ........... ...... -- p P1 . ........ .........................I I--.... .............. ...CSS ........... ...... ............... .......... G $-J� S cres 0 qs cv ,es 43=E sS s P-S, ... ....... ...... .... LA A 32 - lp .......... ...... .................. ........(..�..............4-1......... ... -E ..... .............. ------ ...... Z+'s6 S-Leleua S 1 4.4 ........... ................ .......... ..... .......... .. .. ............. ... ........- ze . .... di-t2 ......._. -P............... ...... ............ ........... .. ............ w P*% T—ij� VX6� A.3 eLS-11! ....... ......... ...... ............ .......... r she 0 0 ................. ................... ...... ........... ........ ............. -...... ....... ES MA .......... .... ........... ............. .......... .......... ............................ .... ................. ...................... ........................................................... STORMDRAINAG9 COMPL�WIONS Iob ...................... ....... ................ ..... ........... ------- 4 Baied lup6n Aat:tozl6l #OrE 10.4 RN Ic o ....... ...... ------------ -------- ...... ................... n,� ........... .iz ........ ............ ............... .......... Pmo ea.AL ...... NG- I V.P. --4 m M#M C-) ............ ....................... 1ZTJNOl ION— HY Toiq c000 t2 . .......... --cx i r fAr 25 o-c-m o .................. .... rn -mc F KAmOL9 to b NO .......................- ... ............ - -------- ...... TO- &>cn ............. I..... .......... ...... ....... ------- -- - ----- cnn r ; ��-]]]��i .. ......... ...... . ........ ........ ....... .......- Lg......... ................ 7. ......... .. .... ......... .... ......... zi ... . . .......... ...... --- ---- ..... . . ..............- ......... ........ .......... ........................ .............. ................ ........ . .............................. Acrep Adres i tLwte�s In./ . cps -i-f 4 CPS FPS 1 FPS z wwlqks�e4 A?:4 I i v%- i-Z-A ------- .......... ......... p tura , vw%%4 tA. .......... ................... ... ......... .......... ............. .......... ............ ............. 2 W. cn O-C s M.W---o-P CO p1h............ 5 1 o- - -. ....p....... ..... ...... ....... .1......... ch.!;.......... 71AL4;� ........ ...... 0 4A :p te�n 43,11.6 ... ............ ........ ............ .... ......................L................. ............ ........ .... .................. ........... ... ..........------ -.............. .......... ........... ........... ................ ........... ......... .... ................... ............I---------- ------- ....... t ............ ........ 4 7,1, 3RkLl T 4 ................................. ------ ............... .I...... ............ ............ ... .......... ...................... ........... ......... ............. .......... ............ .......... ................ ........ ... .......... ............ .............. .............. ............ .. ................................ ........... EASTERN LAND SURVEY ASSOCIATES, INC. JOB �S%Ag"op %-a.jiatjCq Christopher R. Mello PLS SHEET NO. OF 104 Lowell Street CALCULATED BY DATE VL/§!N PEABODY, MA 01960 (978) 531.8121 CHECKED BY DATE SCALE ................... ............ ........ .................................. ........... ........... 'A-1 I ' s ------- -Si-s "Ely cs............. ........ .............. .........L.—---------- ............................... ........... .......... .......... .......... ................ ............. . .. ... .. . ...................... . ........-... .. . . .. .......- ...... .................... R 0-Z Fr-:-: J�' A QP .;.r- ........... ...... ........................I..-,�.,.-...�..-.......,--,.-,...-................................ ................ ..................... ....................................... .................................. ------ ------- --------------- in................. .............. ....... ................... .............. ........ Ir--------- ............................. -A................... ....___...I._..........1._._.._.:--. ................... ...... ........ .......... .................. ...... ........... .............. ................. . ........................ `...---._i....__..._...__.._............ ............. ....... .............. ............... ............... ........ r-c-1 ------- ...................... ............... ............... ...... ................................-.......................... ---------- .......................------- .............. ...................... ...... ........ -----------................. ........... ....... ............ ............ ....................... ............... ........ ------------- ...................... .. .................... ...............- ............ .......... .......... ..................... . . . RR A ------ 0. P ...........- ........... .................. ... ............... 4 .................... ......-.}_._.I._. . ............................... ............ ........... ............ ---V-3-C.12 xq...... .................. .. .................... > 1t ................... ............................ ............... ...... ............_iI -------- 24, KI 0 .............. iw 4 ... ............ M------- ... j-0+-'!�Q-r!Av............. .......... ................ ......... .............. .................. .......... ........................... ...........---------- .......... tj0 ................. ................. ---- n \A) L-L� cLr' I>�r ..............-.-. h �' ............. Q-�4 7E'--.TT�F� ............ .......... 1F Az --------- ....... -------- 417141.... Q-..- ................. ...... .... ------- ----------- .......... ............. ............................... ................. ...................... ...........I.......... . ......... ............................... .............................................. .......................................... ......... .............................. .......... ........ ......................... I T- ......................... ----- ................ ......................... ............................. ....................................................... ..................... ...................! ............ ............... ..................... ...................... ...... ................ -..................... .......................- . . ....................... ......... ...........- . ..........f...................... ............ ..................... ............ .......... -.......... ............ ...................... ....... .................................. -..;............. ................... j.......... .........._.1............. ...........r ......... 10-22 Drainage and Erosion Control 10.0 9.0 8.0 7.0 6.0 TLRI Lot r- 5.0 4.0 3.0 syr FREQUENCY (YRS. ) L 1.0 s a .7 N .6 L U C 4 } U7 Z 2 W F Z .15 J J Q 1 Li- z LZ .09 Q .08 — M .07 .OB .OS 04 .03 .02 .01 - 5 6 7 8 9 10 15 20 30 40 50 60 2 3 4 5 6 8 10 12 18 24 (MINUTES) DURATION (HOURS) Figure 10-4. Intensity — Duration — Frequency Curve for Boston, MA 3-4 r- Pipe Capacities Shallop Landing Subdivision Sewer Pipes -- English Units Civil Tools for Windows (1230-2009, 06:43:08) Flowrate Diameter Friction Slope Velocity (cfs) (in) (1 M (fps) 2.52 12.00 0.013 0.50 3.21 2.25 12.00 0.013 0.40 2.87 5.43 16.00 0.013 0.50 3.89 7.43 18.00 0.013 0.50 4.20 9.40 18.00 0.013 0. 80 5.32 14.31 24.00 0.013 0.40 4.55 3-4'-► -)NA11AAVt t%StWtKAbt.-HYUKAUL1U UUMFU IAI IUN:D-5 a- Cross- Sec}ional For pipes full area of waferwoy — or half-full o- wetted perimeter R 4 Rp Hydraulic radius. SECTION OF ANY OPEN CHANNEL SECTION OF CIRCULAR PIPE V=Average or meon velocity in feet per second. Q = a V-Discharge of pipe or channel in cubic feet per second (c. As.). h = Coefficient of rouyhness ofpipe or chonne/ sulfate , see Tob/e A-R�./8-68. S =S/ape of Hyd�ou/ie G.1`odient (w&-surface in open channels or pipes not under pressure, some os slope of chonne/ or pipe invert only when 4/ow is uniform in constant section. FIG. A- HYDRAULIC ELEMENTS OF CHANNEL 5ECTIONS. loo 90 so 2 r U 70 a 60 v 3 so 4o a 30 H � H Int W 20 1 . to 0 O 10 20 30 40 So 60 70 80 90 !o0 Ito 120 HYDRAULIC ELEMENTS PER CENT OF VALUE FOR FULL SECTION (APPROXIMATE) E AMP E.' Given : Discharge =/2 e.fs Ihrough o pipe which has capacity f/owing fu// of /5 c.,r s. at o velocity of 70 f/.per seta Beguiled to fii o� V fnr Q /2 c.f.s. Perces/age of fu// a4schc,yt - 45 - 80A, Enter chart a/ 60% we ma/ue /5r fu//see/ion wo Hydroa/ic E/emen/s, Aird V-//2.5%x7-7.9 ff per sec. FIG.B-VALUES OF HYDRAULIC ELEMENTS OF CIRCULAR SECTION FOR VARIOUS DEPTHS OF PLOW. 11--4 8 - Tideflex'-Home Page 1 of 2 • • ,r - r, Search +" search... Fax: 412,279.7878 -Need help with searching? Technologies Home About Us News Applications Products&Systems Tech Info Rep Locator Contact/Catalogs lobs r Menu Tideflex Brochure Tideflex Technologies Glick to view A Division of Red Valve Company, Inc. Con den sed Catabg ak , Urrk fide hr mare into Tideflex®Product Line ,y t Highlighted in Condensed { 'k • � Catalog Tideflex Tec_ American Recovery Rebwesbnent Act (ARRA)Section .t.� i1=` ,� ✓•• a pp 1605"BW r • tori+ ai7y ^M Yv^tf�..,:.cal A American" - _— Requirements Tideflex TF-1 with Curved Bill Tideflex TF-1 with Curved Bill Click tide for more info "Click Photo to see Valve Discharging' "Click Photo to see Valve Closure" American Recovery Reinvestment Ad(ARRA) Tideflex Technologies was the original Section 1605"Buy A... inventor and manufacturer of duckbill style Tgeflar Mbdrg check valve and has continued to enhance System for ring and refine the design and performance of this Water Applications inherently The duckbill check valve is inherently a variable orifice device which Ox;F Ude for,more Mfp .^� changes it's effective opening area with Tideflex Mixing System for respect to the internal pressure and mass Potable Water Applications Red flowrate through the unit. This flexibility can .e — Valve... be incorporated into the design of the unit so ° w that it will also perform as a variable flow O _ nozzle- Enhancing velocity discharge and Carractus momentum within a fluid body is the key in achieving adequate mixing. Along with ` xf designing check valves for non-restrictive QFisdastesreo backflow prevention, Tideflex Technologies alos designs and manufactures mixing /p systems which utilize this variable orifice f 0)7r�e shows!Seminars technology and the unique Tideflex r 7 `^ ,if,•*' e `` Hydrodynamic Nozzles. + 'A Twenty years of proven field operation, research and development, and continued engineering enhancements have combined to make the Tideflex Model TF-1 today's most reliable check valve.The bill design is formed in a curve that returns to a closed position every time,achieving the tightest possible seal for backflow applications, particularly at low Flow rates.The eccentric Flat-bottom design allows installation where the invert of the pipe is close to the floor,and the stronger engineered spine provides long-term performance while handling long-term water weight.No other manufacturers can produce this design with these state-of-the-ad features. When you specify the Tideflex TF-1 Curved Bill Check Valve,you're guaranteed to receive a product with a proven record of maintenance- free backflow prevention. ............... ..-.._.. .-.__. _.._..- .__ ......-. ..._... ............. Tideflex Products & Systems http://www.tideflex.com/tf/index.php 1/14/2010 'I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN CONFORMS V' .TO THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE aeT '. S - REGISTERS OF DEEDS OF THE COMMONWEALTH 5 s O OF MASSACHUSETTS. L E G E N D 0 S o SMH EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE f�Q�O L �' ♦ uv L O OMH EXISTING DRAIN MANHOLE EXISTING CATCH BASIN l \ EXISTING HYDRANT .. EXISTING WATER GATE —100 — EXISTING CONTOUR 100.00 uriSITTY P SOT GRADE F,y� ✓qG,� 0 V \ \` 00 \\ ;9Z GENERAL NOTES FOR REGISTRY USE ONLY STREET LAMP 'PpR /� \ FOU ENCE `rFS BBOT 2 pG /, \\ s' 1) THIS PLAN IS THE RESULT OF AN ON THE GROUND FIELD RETAINING WALL /r? P \ y SURVEY AND PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PLANS. l Q s • SMH PROPOSED SEWER MANHOLE a J e'e y\\ \ m'D 2) UTILITIES SHOWN ARE BASED UPON FIELD SURVEY AND • DMH PROPOSED DRAIN MANHOLEO/ \ 3 RECORD PLANS AND ARE NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF PROPOSED CATCH BASIN (<\ 99,t \ UNDERGROUND CONDITIONS. •100 PROPOSED CONTOUR \ 10 x0 PROPOSED SPOT GRADET�,. 3) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING AND N � \ t\\ � N LOCATION, HOTWNOR NOT SHWN ON THESE PLANS, N SIZE AND ELEVATION PROPOSED LIGHT NJ EXISTING UTILITIES"W \ 2 \ PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED / QO(j so \ \ P° \ IN WRITING OF ANY UTILITIES FOUND INTERFERING WITH THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AND APPROPRIATE REMEDIAL ACTION °Nyp, No \ P \\ °°\ BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. 4) THIS PLAN IS BASED ON THE REFERENCED PLANS, DEEDS .A AND THE RESULTS OF A FIELD SURVEY AS OF THIS DATE. G� N$v f�°�a / \ �G �, \ \ _ NO CERTIFICATION IS INTENDED AS TO PROPERTY TITLE OR AS TO THE EXISTENCE OF UNWRITTEN OR UNRECORDED EASEMENTS. 5) THE OWNER SHALL CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE 0 CODES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE MATERIALS AND/OR vol 560 0 \ METHODS OF INSTALLATION OF ANY IMPROVEMENTS DEPICTED L 9 mm2 \� ON THIS PLAN. a NDN z 0 PRO OSED I fff \ \\ 0?ao5 i '5 LING ¢ \\ \ OZo\ Oyf.°• FFF=13.50 00 NN 013 vo \3D°`C Q o�fy\ti \ \ \ t�K�oEJewt+mEar Q 1 f I WoZ�Suefl4 �• \ e O o SIF '� I, CHERYL LAPOINTE. CLERK OF THE CITY OF SALEM, MASS. \,0 opoIfo HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN BY THE SALEM PLANNING BOARD HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND RECORDED AT THIS OFFICE AND NO APPEAL WAS RECEIVED DURING THE NEXT TWENTY DAYS AFTER SUCH RECEIPT AND RECORDING OF SAID NOTICE. I � _ DATE CITY CLERK ILLI q P .\ � APPROVED UNDER THESUBDIVISION CONTROL LAW m lo.3 ` \ 0-\ N �� \ •A oo O S N _ PRWE`�ND o '4i 0 NN CD Z C- it H x 161 g\ > ?VO W6VUNseep, Q -- '---- ------ - / l o 6'1 voff,Nz. A DEFINITIVE SUBDIVISION PLAN ^n • PROPOSEDESEMENTITv /// , /�/ PROP 056G / „ _j0 j5 - s94 4o —_ (SEE SHEET 61_ _- - _ .� A OFE�\26� / LL 10P ELEJ. � _ - The Residences at ShallopLanding vo 1. ~ I1 Tc P40'`{ _ - Ow LOT LOT 5 PR ` NGT Q PROp04Deo15In° 61 G !AUTHO SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS Fp C(„Jc off,f2e W ,5= 005IN TOPOGRAPHIC PLAN -0 - - o l4'00 PROPOSED f // o T9 ADEM N Tea Prepared For. PreparedSr a O a I N z N 1 DWELLING ` / / / \ 5 Shallop LandN9 LLC Eastam Land Survey Aesoa, /no. o- • I o u FFF=12.67 , � / 9 •e Lowell Street 044BLowelll St, Peabody, Main, 01960 rc U- n o LL O \ / a' PDT O0.p0.y f08 Peobody, MA. 01960 (978) 531-8121 \ ~ p0. SS 0.00 • � F i GONND(61"5 SCALE 1. o. NOTE 0 10 20 40 60 L 1 M 1 t O P frizGn CAoin LiM Fence x y1ILS g 1 s PROPOSED DWELLING CONFIGURATIONS AND LOCATIONS ARE SHOWN a g FOR THE PURPOSE OF ESTABLISHING GRADING PATTERNS AND ARE DAZE o SUBJECT TO MINOR ADJUSTMENTS IN 7HE FlELD. OCTOBER 9, 2009 Ch/lalopAn R. NYIo Cls m A. N°rsr PLS JIJO E Ja969 ASSESSED.TO SHAWMUT MERCHANT BANK Ep F 1 461 REHS�alds HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN CONFORMS I TO THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE REGISTERS OF DEEDS OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS. F \per \ \\ `\ FOR REGISTRY USE ONLY ,PUy'�Q?5� \ \. 9 ��• REFERENCES: ASSESSORS MAP 41 PARCELS 235,236.243,244,246 AND 274 PLAN REFERENCES.' PLAN BOOK 395 PLAN 100 PLAN BOOK 94 PLAN 28 ZONING DISTRICT IS R-2 THE SITE /S LOCATED IN FLOOD ZONE B AS EVIDENCED BY FEMA FIRM 250102 0001B, DATED 8-5-1985 4 ,) THE SITE /5 SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT RECORDED IN BOOK 1763 PAGE 98 AND SHOWN ON PLAN BOOK 14 PLAN 26 6 R D3 E G E N D RECORD OWNERS Ay yo, �a?K_ S\?979Q i \SF O9N•Y•• �' \m.c\S� LAND OF LIVINGSTON CITY OF SALEM SMH EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE o DMH EXISTING DRAIN MANHOLE H & H PROPELLER CO. \� rod\ \yen \ \ \ o ® EXISTING CATCH BASIN EXISTING 0 EXISTING WA / TER GATE ti — 100 — EXISTING CONTOUR ' • �F 100.00 EXISTING SPOT GRADE �ay� / U11Utt POLE 's RETAINING WALL �\ STONE WALL CURB W l�0 'o / m (n —.— — FENCE • 30 'l�G // \ \� \\ ",• \ �R401 6J E.LaV Y`^%raJT vj& \ TereS+�eTo4 I, CHERYL LAPOINTE, CLERK OF THE CITY OF SALEM, MASS. i, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN BY 3 /N 9.2 \� THE SALEM PLANNING BOARD HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND x \ \ RECORDED AT THIS OFFICE AND NO APPEAL WAS RECEIVED DURING H _ I PcA �� .. \ a ':^,6\ THE NEXT TWENTY DAYS AFTER SUCH RECEIPT AND RECORDING OF C I T Y O F S A L E M SAID NOTICE. CITY CLERK 10. OR AREA = 92740± SF - S - \ Rod (F / OR 2.13 ACRES \ \ APPROVED UNDER THE SUBDIVISION CONTROL LAW Wcrl op . T \ I_ li to iN I / �o� -.� I�• 7.610.7 apV \g•� "✓ ---- DEFINITIVE SUBDIVISION PLAN Icy v SRI 0. ` 1 e Landing The Residences at Shallo ( `l Ii y� O �� 61 I / �_ \ 90 `� �1'�, /.y • P4 Vf HENT 5 u " SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS a W� q \ a '9 'S2Cyr 5 o5E EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN Ali 0- 7.9Prepared For Prepay y. Shallop Landing LLC Eastem Land SMrwy Assoc, Inc 40 Lowell Street Christopher R. Mello P.L.S _ 10..e Ia Peabody, Mo. 01970 104 Lowell St, Peabody, Mass, 01960 O 1• /� rlJ7 V o io.r se I (978) 531-8121 o / A9 U- 'I I / \;n SCALE n2.78• —_ as.Ta' 3 . / .R.IORffY I. Pin (F AU ' ` c Nil 1'�8' n �as G 5 38•E s.wen mU$IN of 19 a it o r EM N 32g o zo 40 so plpP _. N See DATE "I OCTOBER 9. 2009 cnN,loPna.s. Menlo S)(py Nlq-� ASSESSED TO SHAWMUT MERCHANT BANK P(5 JIJI]��r�zmne � RENSIONS F 146' SHEET 2 OF i COLLIN S COVE ( TIDAL ) FOR REGISTRY USE ONLY PROP. FLARED END MEAN HIGH WATER 8 STABILIZED RIPRAP INV. = 1.30 s s DUMPED RIPRAP SLOPE GRASSED AREA PROPOSED - "" I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN CONFORMS SILT BARRIERol REMOVE EXISTING DRAIN TO THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE REGISTERS OF DEEDS OF THE COMMONWEALTH GUARO RAIL OF MASSACHUSETTS. .. . ... .. .. .. . . . . . .. . .. . . _ - - - - f S Z E T E L A L A N E PROPOSED U.P. 24" DRAINS NEW DMH S S E /\ PROP. 18" DRAIN — E r S o DMH - - - -6 - - - - -- - - - p - - - - D- -- - - - _ S MH / IOQ KOOT BUFFER ZONE /o BOUNDARY u U Q CO h o v ►') N II p IS m 0 o O 3 2 Q 2 UJ NAIGV FREDERICK IN. N NI J ►- o O o - V_ 881 a ° _ o _ LLJ ENS r 0 I, CHERYL LAPOINTE, CLERK OF THE CITY OF SALEM, MASS. HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN BY o THE SALEM PLANNING BOARD HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND 213 -4 RECORDED AT THIS OFFICE AND NO APPEAL WAS RECEIVED DURING D 00 THE NEXT TWENTY DAYS AFTER SUCH RECEIPT AND RECORDING OF SAID NOTICE. � h m I o� DATE CITY CLERK 'Z -� I I APPROVED UNDER THE SUBDIVISION CONTROL LAW i � I CO I �,4 40 COT I I OP�� DEFINITIVE SUBDIVISION PLAN ANO The Residences at Shallop Landing O L E G E N D SALEM , M ASSACH U SETTS ,C� P r 01 SMH EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE EXHIBIT PLAN o. DMH EXISTING DRAIN MANHOLE ® orad For. Pre EXISTING CATCH BASIN p pared By. EXISTING HYDRANT Pre '9 Shallop Landing LLC Eastem Land Survey Assoc., Inc. c V — EXISTING WATER GATE 40 Lowell Street Christopher R. Mello P.L.S. — 100 — EXISTING CONTOUR /V 100.00 EXISTING SPOT GRADE Peabody, MA. 01960 104 Lowell St, Peabody, Mass, 01960 (� UTILITY POLE (978) 531-8121 a^ STREET LAMP F - CURB SCALE —x — x — FENCE 1' = 40' RETAINING WALL0 SMH PROPOSED SEWER c.q }CHRIS ERo DMH PROPOSED PROPOSED CATCH BASING EE 0 20 40 80 80 100 PROPOSED CONTOUR F i 100x0 PROPOSED SPOT GRADE DATE L PROPOSED LIGHT NOVEMBER 3, 2009 REWSIONs F 1 4611 r SHEET A OF I I I I r I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN CONFORMS \ TO THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE p0�\� ESB (Fnd) REGISTERS OF DEEDS OF THE COMMONWEALTH GGC\ tins OF MASSACHUSETTS. 5� � o ?09, RECORD OWNERS FOR REGISTRY USE ONLY QO�� CITY OF SALE,, .� �s� LAND OF LIVINGSTON AP � H & H PROPELLER CO. REFERENCES: So F o o° °' o° s� ASSESSORS MAP 41 PARCELS 235,236.243,244,246 AND 274 110 -7-11 00 -00oo tis PLAN REFERENCES PLAN BOOK . 395 PLAN PLAN BOOK 94 PAN 28 0 o \moo o s v� G ZONING DISTRICT IS R-2 o`' LOT 9 �"�'y �s ��' �' THE SITE IS LOCATED IN FLOOD ZONE B AS EWDENCED BY N, �� ` FEMA FIRM 250102 0001B, DATED 8-5-1985 CP 6,571 ± S.F. s 'o p� \ Q� sem: �� THE SITE IS SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT RECORDED IN BOOK No. Ln N j * 0. ti oo \ ° �� 1763 PAGE 98 AND SHOWN ON PLAN BOOK 14 PLAN 26 ee o. �z o `r° 1-% 4i 60 o -9 � LOT 10 / QP 1� 67479* S.F. A O) 5 R=15.00 DL2 16'304" =56.12'17" �P 90 L=44.14 o 6� I, CHERYL LAPOINTE, CLERK OF THE CITY OF SALEM, MASS. HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN BY tiR s9 �� 000 a o \ THE SALEM PLANNING BOARD HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND S D� ,`► �� 0 4 = ? 339 o \ RECORDED AT THIS OFFICE AND NO APPEAL WAS RECEIVED DURING sg. O �, D �� D� C _° 39 38 05 E o os� CIV �, 35.50 520.51 3� 90, 4 R,15 0o THE NEXT TWENTY DAYS AFTER SUCH RECEIPT AND RECORDING OF 8 SAID NOTICE. 0 0 45•0 co '2 5 L 0. 5g �, �—lp DATE �� . �.�• CITY CLERK R PN � e 6 a r ' I. Rod (Fnd) --j 2 �' APPROVED UNDER THE SUBDIVISION CONTROL LAW LOT 14 N / / nL\'OP -5C3D 51'OS w 18 �� sF L 6,389± S.F. N01 34 44 W / N P NZ 0p �' �o� � � AA -11A - S 51• o �-• S,F • � w 58.43, o E)1 -00 CP. � , 0 uM� oe �° \ae g5.76 2 �' z � / /� �F�o5e�ec i� Q`�u's R t�5 56 �O� S F • o. - 00 77.27_ _ _ — a°'o� LJtI / / GS��j 0:18 5 /5 t'A 15„ oo W — — — z v 62/ 771 L_22.83 X003'38 3 cp �, �j L=15.32 0_15.151, T) vol SF 2- 63. DEFINITIVE SUBDIVISION PLAN N01'34'44"W 81 .00' / 63� p =19'30'37" o0 1 The Residences at Shallop Landing 00 o Q 0 - - - 84_36'In — LOT 6 �� 1�1�SF 51595' SALEM , MASSACHUSETTS 7,581 ± S.F. LOT 5 CP. SUBDIVISION PLAN o 5,384± S.F. ��- 51�0 Prepared For Prepared By. � ` N o LOT 15 N o0 ^N `n 51'05 Shallop Landing LLC Eastern Land Survey Assoc., Inc. 0 5,670± S.F. N `2 520 40 Lowell Street Christopher R. Mello P.L.S. O N r N 00' Peabody, Mo. 01970 104 Lowell St, Peabody, Mass, 01960 00 (n 51 (978) 531-8121 LL 0 9.50 SCALE � 57.34' 34.45' 49.74' ri ORIT`( 1" = 20' I. Pin (Fnd) 81.00' � � H NO2'14'12"W ioU N oOSING of P �g51 Sol 034'44"E 172.79' - J / �M 329 0 20 40 60 L/ ,... 00 SAL ee plDn DATE r _. $ ■ DENOTES STONE BOUND TO BE SET UNDER OCTOBER 9, 2009 Christopher n. Mello THE SUPERWSION OF A MASS REGISTERED I PCS s1317 ASSESSED TO SHAWMUT MERCHANT BANK PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR REVISIONS F 1 4611 1. NOVEMBER 25, 2009 3. JANUARY 28, 20/0 2. DECEMBER :29, 2004' - SHEET 3 OF 8 ' EFINITIVE SUBDIVISION PLAN OF THE RESIDENCES AT SHALLOP IN T--7TSALEM 51111 MA ,111 GENERAL NOTES INDEX TO DRAWINGS 1 THIS PLAN IS THE RESULT OF AN ON THE GROUND FIELD r — SURVEY AND PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PLANS. - ` .I' . SHEET 1 INDEX PLAN 2) UTILITIES SHOWN ARE BASED UPON FIELD SURVEY AND ;' _ =j s �� I RECORD PLANS AND ARE NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF SHEET 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN = �l - �: ,. •� UNDERGROUND CONDITIONS. � ewf� SHEET 3 SUBDIVISION PLAN; SHEET 4 TOPOGRAPHIC PLAN 3) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING AND SHEET 5 PLAN & PROFILE SHALLOP LANF DETERMINING THE LOCATION, SIZE AND ELEVATION OF ALL SHEET 6 PLAN & PROFILE — EASEMENTS EXISTING UTILITIES, SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN ON THESE PLANS, n yPTuck o,,,, - SHEET 7 DETAILS PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED : - ya '- SHEET 8 OFFSITE DRAINAGE PL-AN IN WRITING OF ANY UTILITIES FOUND INTERFERING WITH THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AND APPROPRIATE REMEDIAL ACTION BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. ,;, \;, �,.,�,I -- x "Y e< r- °; , SdamNeck RECORD OWNERS ; 1-..- . / ;. •�AF Junes • A}ti ra �' . / '�`"'� ' _ :Etat ,y h '" CITY OF SALEM 4) THIS PLAN IS BASED ON THE REFERENCED PLANS, DEEDSo�, �. LAND OF LIVINGSTON AND THE RESULTS OF A FIELD SURVEY AS OF THIS DATE. �' " ' \ / '� a " " '• . � Ab" •i & H PROPELLER CO. NO CERTIFICATION IS INTENDED AS TO PROPERTY TITLE _ OR AS TO THE EXISTENCE OF UNWRITTEN OR UNRECORDED EASEMENTS PWM K�pp Jf \ 1 V 5) THE OWNER SHALL CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE � '� G �," \T1�^ ° • s° `Aaak p ';.. " . s •• FERENCES: CODES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE MATERIALS ANDIOR W too C„ wait , METHODS OF INSTALLATION OF ANY IMPROVEMENTS DEPICTED Q ON THIS PLAN. - ' " T ' l �' / • N V M ' ` ASSESSORS MAP 41 PARCELS 235,236.243,244,246 AND 274 �� •, � � ;re .M`she -- r �� - - _ - 41 a 4 LOCUS pY PLAN REFERENCES. PLAN BOOK 395 PLAN 100 ti ♦ . . °nt � G� PLAN BOOK 94 PLAN 28 1;bong Point •v:.E�tif . _ r y ZONING DISTRICT IS R-2 Ursa Pe"r _"• THE SITE IS LOCATED IN FLOOD ZONE B AS EVIDENCED BY L E G E N D FEMA FIRM 250102 0001B, DA TED 8-5- 1985 o SMH EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE • SMH PROPOSED SEWER MANHOLE THE SITE IS SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT RECORDED /N BOOK o DMH EXISTING DRAIN MANHOLE • DMH PROPOSED DRAIN MANHOLEO T r MAP 1763 PAGE 98 AND SHOWN ON PLAN BOOK 14 PLAN 26 C® EXISTING CATCH BASIN ■ PROPOSED CATCH BASIN v l� ova EXISTING HYDRANT •r PROPOSED HYDRANT 0.4 EXISTING WATER GATE – PROPOSED WATER GATE — 100 — EXISTING CONTOUR 100 PROPOSED CONTOUR 100.00 EXISTING SPOT GRADE 100x0 PROPOSED SPOT GRADE DEFINITIVE SUBDIVISION PLAN UTILITY POLE ' RETAINING WALL 000000000 STONE WALL The Residences at Shallop Landing CURB —X — X — FENCE SALEM , MASSACHUSETTS RESOURCE AREA BOUNDARY INDEX PLAN _Prepared For Prepared By. FOR REGISTRY USE ONLY SHALLOP LANDING LLC Eastern Land Survey Assoc., Inc. 40 Lowell Street Christopher R. Mello P.L.S. Peabody, Mo. 01970 104 LoweN St, Peabody, Mass, 01960 (978) 531-8121 SCALE AS N07ED APPROVED UNDER THE SUBDIVISION CONTROL LAW h' " I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN CONFORMS I, CHERYL LAPOINTE, CLERK OF THE CITY OF SALEM, MASS. /- -- - - Y�'V TO THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN BY - - -- - o i INCHES z 3 ,/ REGISTERS OF DEEDS OF THE COMMONWEALTH THE SALEM PLANNING BOARD HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND _ _ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ DA 7E OF MASSACHUSETTS. _ - RECORDED AT THIS OFFICE AND NO APPEAL WAS RECEIVED DURING OCTOBER 92009 Christopher R. Mello THE NEXT TWENTY DAYS AFTER SUCH RECEIPT AND RECORDING OF _ PLS 31317 F 14611 ' /,/ Q ,SAID NOTICE. REVISIONS NOVEMBER %5, 2009 DATE - CITY CLERKZ DECEMBER 29, 2009 SHEET 1 OF 8 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN CONFORMS TO THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE Af\ 0, REGISTERS OF DEEDS OF THE COMMONWEALTH Cp \ � #�j' � OF MASSACHUSETTS. INN v C9 / A `n , x, 9. 1 � o ��'^^� \` SREFERENCES: FOR REGISTRY USE ONLY 9 s\ ASSESSORS MAP 41 PARCELS 235,236.243,244,246 AND 274 9- PLAN REFERENCES.• PLAN BOOK 395 PLAN 100 PLAN BOOK 94 PLAN 28 ZONING DISTRICT IS R-2 CD P / v � � / �, � �> � \ THE SITE IS LOCATED IN FLOOD ZONE B AS EI/IDENCED BY �s� �`� FEMA FIRM 250102 00018, DA TED 8-5- 1985 %K I gs, 9.3 e & `� h' THE SITE IS SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT RECORDED IN BOOK , p �'. sem, �\,no F � .o M 9. _ �P Ge qR Rpp F �\ 1763 PAGE 98 AND SHOWN ON PLAN BOOK 14 PLAN 26 Q7 j v 0 9.� �� F,q F� \ �0 \ a ) 60F 1a o / R � �� 3 Cp v��a L E G E N D m .4^ / I o� \ S� �'1A \ ` G \ RECORD OWNERS �/ �' CITY OF SALEM o I S� 200 \ �� \ \ o SMH EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE 2929. z- my o DMH EXISTING DRAIN MANHOLE LAND OF LIVINGSTON 70� \ v \ ® EXISTING CATCH BASIN H & H PROPELLER CO. 9. 9.2 9.0o oAy � EXISTING HYDRANT �ooP � �� i' �� EXISTING WATER GATE 100 - EXISTING CONTOUR 100.00 EXISTING SPOT GRADE -0- UTILITY POLE s G�' o� QQ� �� v RETAINING WALL 8'4 \fl \ 000000000 STONE WALL 9.3 / `�\ � � CURB a� �� / / p j N -x - x - FENCE \ 3 9. CHERYL LAPOINTE, CLERK OF THE CITY OF SALEM, MASS. HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN BY SHED �ti� / 9.z `��. \ THE SALEM PLANNING BOARD HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND RECORDED AT THIS OFFICE AND NO APPEAL WAS RECEIVED DURING THE NEXT TWENTY DAYS AFTER SUCH RECEIPT AND RECORDING OF % II '` \ SAID NOTICE. m � y C � CI TY OF SALEM o\O a AREA = 92740f SF \ A DATE CITY CLERK L j0'l IL wI. Rod (F OR 2.13 ACRES I �., A �"s� Y g p A \ APPROVED UNDER THE SUBDIVISION CONTROL LAW o l a ¢ /0 8.9 l W \yam m ,l / W 00 a r7 / 10.6 - r L0 - 7.1 00z I E W I 7.8 o � DEFINITIVE SUBDIVISION PLAN % 10.8 �� . l� '�' ,° o l ILO 6.9 j 7.16 _ 0 9 The Residences at Shallop Landing � C, -- - ! NP o . m , 9.7 � SALEM , MASSACHUSETTS 95 I 6.4 8 1. •5105 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN o 52 /9 � 7.9 Prepared For Prepared By. 00 Shallop Landing LLC Eastern Land Survey Assoc., Inc. 40 Lowell Street Christopher R. Mello P.L.S. i; O 00 11.0 10.8 Peabody, Mo. 01970 104 Lowell St, y, Peobod Mass, 01960 0 / 10.7 9.8 ( /' (978) 531-8121 9.9 o'I o /, SCALE / 49.78' i vi TY �-" 1" = 20' . . I I 9 i 7 • M" 172.7 R I 0 , 3 0 0' I. Pin (FndL �N � Y �0 0o a m E' CHA/N LlN/C FENCE - NO2.11'O8"W 04 YYY ' S01'35'38"E cv �os SING P 195 -- ----- �,j ' 0 6• W000 FENCE � 1,oU f --- ----- --- to M ALEM f 1 Qn 329 0 20 40 so 00 S See PI DATE OCTOBER 9, 2009 Christopher R. Mello HA WMUT MERCHANT BANK I sr` r eRiCK APAR�"N REVISIONS PLS 31311 7 ASSESSED To s r 6UiLDiNG F 14611 1. NOVEMBER 25, 2009 2. DECEMBER 29, 2009 SHEET 2 OF 8 J� I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN CONFORMS ECSB (Fnd) TO THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE 0� REGISTERS OF DEEDS OF THE COMMONWEALTH OC�O ti OF MASSACHUSETTS. G mss• 151 I P 5 PGS Qq\ -1 0 � X09 RECORD OWNERS FOR REGISTRY USE ONLY Q CITY OF SA`�, , LAND OF LIVINGSTON lij H & H PROPELLER CO. o .0 a ti F 0 X66 0 REFERENCES: so � � 0' �° s� ASSESSORS MAP 41 PARCELS 235,236.243,244,246 AND 274 Q�P� o° c9 PLAN REFERENCES.- PLAN BOOK 395 PLAN 100 <o PLAN BOOK 94 PLAN 28 - Q� ZONING DISTRICT IS R-2 `� LOT 9 � �'`j1� �s� THE SITE IS LOCATED IN FLOOD ZONE B AS EVIDENCED BY �� FEMA FIRM 250102 0001B, DA TED 8-5- 1985 6,571 ± S.F. z- w J'� 'o o� THE SITE IS SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT RECORDED IN BOOK 0 �, �, o• �� o F �� (/ 1763 PAGE 98 AND SHOWN ON PLAN BOOK 14 PLAN 26 �0 , \ 7 coLOT 10 67479± S.F. A� �O� k�5 oR 15.0 o4„ 0 sA <0 � X35 � \ 2 � OCA °O �s Dc L=2 6... 3 ub 0 =56'12'17^ L=44.14 8 , - O ,L> I, CHERYL LAPOINTE, CLERK OF THE CITY OF SALEM, MASS. �� D ` r�`�1 ?sas,, \ HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN BY gg o \\ THE SALEM PLANNING BOARD HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND t` 00 o a = ?o � 3 .J 3. o RECORDED AT THIS OFFICE AND NO APPEAL WAS RECEIVED DURING 'S90 e 520510� � go =15 THE NEXT TWENTY DAYS AFTER SUCH RECEIPT AND RECORDING OF q5.00 SAID NOTICE. o-CO \ ' _ �' �P ±_20.59 2 DATE CITY CLERK I. Rod (Fnd) // // 00 ��• LOT 14 n J r APPROVED UNDER THE SUBDIVISION CONTROL LAW �_ / OP 395' ,05� � sem: W N 6,389± S.F. N01'34'44"W LQ S.F Li 58.43' o �51� 000 / cp cp.LP , W — — — — — — — F e � j? o. m ' m/ Z� / a, Cn . — D- -' 6 z z J 262 i Q�. L=22.83 3 3a 3 aCP cc �: �/ L=15.32 =15 15'11" �o LOQ F . o. s: 6�. > No13444"w 81 .00 — i 3� 5 �` DEFINITIVE SUBDIVISION PLAN o =19'30 37 CP Q CD r _ _ _84.36 _ _ -- - O` Oo The Residences at Shallop Landing - - LOT 6 1 �' �sF 5�- SALEM , MASSACHUSETTS 7,581 ± S.F. CP �,�31 225 g5 o LOT 5 SUBDIVISION PLAN o o �^ �' 59384± S.F. 5� Prepared For Prepared By. 0 5967 00±5S.F. N �' s2°�1o� 4o LoShollowelaStreet LLe Eastern Land Christopher R.Survey Mello P.L.S. Inc. r 00 Peabody, Mo. 01970 10'4 Lowell St, Peabody, Moss, 01960 00 00 00 (n 5� (978) 331-8121 U) LL 0 9 50 SCALE 57.34' 34.45' 49.74' ffi ORITY 1" = 20' I. Pin (Fnd) 81 .0(0 3: U NO2.14'12"W tn 51(`IG P 1951 1 ;1 S01 '34'44"E 172.79' t) �M HO 3rLg Of 0 20 40 60 V ,F � SPS ee PIa� DATE ,.. 5 " DENOTES STONE BOUND TO BE SET UNDER OCTOBER 9, 2009 Christopher R. Mello THE SUPER KSION OF A MASS. REGISTERED PLS 31317 ASSESSED TO SHAWMUT MERCHANT BANK PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR REVISIONS F 14611 I. NOVEMBER 25, 2009 2. DECEMBER 29, 2009 SHEET 3 OF B NOTE 100 The Site Contractor shall prepare a plan showing the ` details of proposed bulkheads at each end of the 60" \ S 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN CONFORMS abandoned sewer for approval by the City Engineer. \ m \ TO THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE Following construction of the bulkheads, the existing �! �l REGISTERS OF DEEDS OF THE COMMONWEALTH pipe shall be crushed and the void filled with clean / • (\ \ O OF MASSACHUSETTS. compacted soil materials. C Preparation and submittal of the plan shall be �Gv \\ \ C accomplished prior to commencement of site utility construction. / /✓! vv L E G E N D �� O SMH EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE !�� ` 9 '\ o DMH EXISTING DRAIN MANHOLE EXISTING CATCH BASIN \I o� EXISTING HYDRANT \ f \ \�• \ � EXISTING WATER GATE 0_'o A \ \7�4 100 — EXISTING CONTOUR �100.00 EXISTING SPOT GRADE F, � �q�, �� o°sF FOR REGISTRY USE ONLY UTILITY POLE '�` �- 0 / o GENERAL NOTES0STREET LAMP CURB S B G \ o �f,_x _ „ _ FENCE F � tiQ1 ) THIS PLAN IS THE RESULT OF AN ON THE GROUND FIELD �� SURVEY AND PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PLANS. RETAINING WALL• SMH PROPOSED SEWER MANHOLE \ i / pm 2) UTILITIES SHOWN ARE BASED UPON FIELD SURVEY AND • DMH PROPOSED DRAIN MANHOLE / / �\ RECORD PLANS AND ARE NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF ■ PROPOSED CATCH BASIN I, \t �w . UNDERGROUND CONDITIONS. 100 PROPOSED CONTOUR J0 100x0 PROPOSED SPOT GRADE / t o o` , �\ d 3) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING AND PROPOSED :ASN 'A DETERMINING THE LOCATION, SIZE AND ELEVATION OF ALL PROPOSED LIGHT HIM J,,- \ °Pe / �, , j i ^�\ \ EXISTING UTILITIES, SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN ON THESE PLANS, Nv r:.s. �i o PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED T.O.W. TOP OF WALL ELEVATION. / .� f , (0 �,� O`�F \\ IN WRITING OF ANY UTILITIES FOUND INTERFERING WITH THE / + \ + COQ ��Go \ \ PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AND APPROPRIATE REMEDIAL ACTION BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. 4) THIS PLAN IS BASED ON THE REFERENCED PLANS, DEEDS Catch Basins A and B shall be 2'-6" I.D. (. �y�o e \po AND THE RESULTS OF A FIELD SURVEY AS OF THIS DATE. b py E.F. Shea Concrete Products with 4"cast concrete structures as manufactured PGv �� ° cc \ \ \ NO CERTIFICATION IS INTENDED AS TO PROPERTY TITLE e ! �\ H-20 Covers. Frame and grate sha;; be Q _ eQ µF �� ,• \ OR AS TO THE EXISTENCE OF UNWRITTEN OR UNRECORDED Product R-4360A, 18" Diam. Turtleback �' / / c \ \o ` \ \ EASEMENTS. Frame and Grate. r1I � °° h° Gr + I '�`L \� 5) THE OWNER SHALL CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE MATERIALS AND/OR �,� �,�� v \ METHODS OF INSTALLATION OF ANY IMPROVEMENTS DEPICTED ee`' � +`5Y °� �\\ ' \ QROPO��oo ON THIS PLAN. LOT 9 PROPOSED ,\ \� \ DWELLING \ \ 0Z \ d� T FFF= 13.00 \ h `� 00 / p \ \\ COQ to vO OS�o �p Seo �F' P \� X25 Q O �\>� oo % s PRO; SED CBSN B' 0 0 ,IM= .50 �o v = 6.I5 o I, CHERYL LAPOINTE, CLERK OF THE CITY OF SALEM, MASS. �Q °c�<, �� oQ°� oo i ! HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN BY ° 65 ° - a } \\ THE SALEM PLANNING BOARD HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND rn --- hLij ti. o��F 9 RECORDED AT THIS OFFICE AND NO APPEAL WAS RECEIVED DURING T \ N \ s\\ THE NEXT TWENTY DAYS AFTER SUCH RECEIPT AND RECORDING OF z \ / C. r SAID NOTICE. LOT 14 , -- � r65 \ - \\ o\ `\ y\� \ DATE - - CITY CLERK LLJ a P \ X- allm w 10.3 \ Q ,— "-�A \\ APPROVED UNDER THE SUBDIVISION CONTROL LAW D A �iw - - -- - - - -- 1'=9.30 p PY op LIJ — -- - - - IJ N wa P POS l. t W - N Z ow 112 e°o° �� O� \ FFF - v I e o \ – – q, 4 , w0 Q a- >> I �, , 1 , - j �j pVJE� 2 61 N�E r0. eo Q k v� FFF PROPOSED U �LIrY � � G� r7 �° x >O�.. � DEFINITIVE SUBDIVISION PLAN c�EO �� EASEMENT N`� =o� x ,SEF SHEET F The Residences at Shallop Landing � FF ��'x5° � Q..P*�� wP -- j - 6 0 50 I1Y SALEM , MASSACHUSETTS H j L O T 15 - pRop ROP OS�� , , 4z TW OR ( x ww �we�c°Seo LOT 5 Pov�E�126� 8 , - ` / j ow 0 pU 0 w Fc\ Nc FFF o�SiN TOPOGRAPHIC PLAN LL Q o U Q I \ \ 14'00 PROPOSED / / 8 Pio Oo?�N -7 9 EM N S4 Prepared For: Prepared v o- O z 4 ir~ 3 DWELLING / s'O' SPU Shallop Landing LLC Eastem Land Survey Assoc., Inc. o J N wo FFF=12.67 40 Lowell Street Christopher R. Mello P.L.S. LL_ — j o o I �� I / / u �� / \0� 9 Peabody, MA. 01960 104 Lowell 78) 531a��; Moss, 01960 J I o m \� �N`Ej eo SCALE _ p r Q f• PROPOSED 6' IDE WOOD FENCE –_ ,x92 0 _ '�� ° 1 – 20 m I / v v m '02 xh -- - x—i s s - —_� Chain Lira F e , --- PROPOSED BULKHEAD x k Wood r'^_nce _� / NOTE 0 10 20 40 6G O SEE NOTE 100 Exislin Chain Link Fence Q � z _ 9 PROPOSED DWELLING CONFIGURATIONS AND LOCATIONS ARE SHOWN % 10 PROPOSED RETAIING WALL TOP = 12.00 FOR THE PURPOSE OF ESTABLISHING GRADING PATTERNS AND ARE DATE SUBJECT TO MINOR ADJUSTMENTS IN THE FIELD. OCTOBER 9, 2009 Chris, 3138 Me c ClGaon ;A9 Sorin REVISIONS F 14611 ' I ASSESSED TD SHAWMUT MERCHANT BANK 1. NOVEMBER 25, 2009 2. DECEMBER 29, 2009 SHEET a OF B - 11 'lll ! �I - -- - �''I ■Ii 7701[ PLAN — SHALLOP LANE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING AND DETERMINING THE LOCATION, SIZE AND ELEVATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES, SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN ON i THESE PLANS, PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IN WRITING OF ANY UTILITIES FOUND INTERFERING WITH THE PROPOSED CONSTRPRITE RE vc) G�T 9 1 0 = � BEEFOREUPROCEEDING CT10N AND WITHOTHEA WORKMEDIAL ACTION 1 y � 01 2) TRENCHES CUT INTO EXISTING PAVEMENT SHALL BE HEAT m PATCHED. v \ n Q) 1 3) ALL WATER MAINS SHALL BE CLASS 52 CEMENT LINED n 1 8 INCH DIAMETER DUCTILE IRON PIPE. �o r 10 cT 4) ALL GRAVIITY SEWER MAINS SHALL BE 8" DIAMETER o - SDR 35 PVC PIPE. FOR REGISTRY USE ONLY \ / 5) WATER AND SEWER SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH A MIN- I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN CONFORMS IMUM HORIZONTAL SEPARATION OF 10 FEET. A MINIMUM IP12 58,59 VERTICAL SEPARATION OF 18 INCHES SHALL BE MAINTAINED TO THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE N WHERE WATER AND SEWER FACILITIES CROSS. REGISTERS OF DEEDS OF THE COMMONWEALTH 00 3 1 PROPOSED 8" 6" TEE S 6) ALL STORM DRAINS SHALL BE CLASS III RCP OF MASSACHUSETTS. 6" G.V. AND HYDRANT T EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE NOTED HEREON. * f a 11 C � OPPOSITE HIGH POINT I� \ 221124 BEND WIftESTRAINo L T VIA e 0 1 17) MINIMUM PITCH FROM CATCH BASINS TO DRAIN MANHOLES OF WATER MAIN O Clr, =12 13.59 1 SHALL BE .005 FEET PER FOOT. — / 1 I o 8) ELECTRIC, GAS, TELEPHONE AND CABLE SERVICE SHALL BE INSTALLED I -- G \l A f N (2 ' 0 G � UNDERGROUND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE UTILITY AGENCY l Cr) 1 HAVING JURISDICTION. W —MAIN / / � SMH017 R l _ 2- 45° BENDS 9 FIRE ALARM BOX INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONS SHALL BE IN D de )o W G _ G -- —� WI RESTRAINT ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SALEM, MASS. L E G E N D S �� ; I I FIRE DEPARTMENT O SMH EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE C,� ° X892 1 W / O DMH EXISTING DRAIN MANHOLE �- 6 Po \ SO 1 0 50 I DMH 1 1000 _)MH' 10) TRANSITIONS FROM THE PROPOSED ROADWAYS INTO DRIVEWAYS EXISTING CATCH BASIN II • 4.31 100 124.33 ` \ 1 �. p -I Y — --DMh + D SHALL BE MADE USING RADIUS GRANITE CURBS. EH SEMEN? h n I \�� rya EXISTING HYDRANT UTILITY EA ; DMH I_ PROPOSED OSED S S � EXISTING WATER GATE PROP SEE 5HEET / SMH CURB SMH STORMCEPTOR 11) PROPOSED DWELLINGS ON LOTS 1-13 WILL BE PROVIDED WITH C MODEL STC 1200 0( 5XIBOD SCREENED GUTTERS WHICH DISCHARGE TO THE STORM DRAINAGE — 100 — EXISTING CONTOUR 6 OT Qo STOP SYSTEM SHOWN HEREON SHOWN HEREON. 100.00 EXISTING SPOT GRADE 6 3 e UTILITY POLE m m t N w' N N N STREET LAMP N 3 a CURB o- FENCE x — x — �� O x. RETAINING WALL — _ N NOTE �� cc • SMH PROPOSED SEWER MANHOLE PROPOSED DWELLING CONFIGURATIONS AND LOCA71ONS ARE ILLUSTRATIVE ONLY OT S zw O -.i-; • DMH PROPOSED DRAIN MANHOLE PATTERNS.AND ARE SHOWN FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF ESTABLISHING PROPOSED GRADING LOT 4 LOT 3 LOT 2 W< LOT 1 i � M PROPOSED CATCH BASIN 100 PROPOSED CONTOUR 100x0 PROPOSED SPOT GRADE in L PROPOSED LIGHT E PROFILE — SHALLOP LANE w sus ieN 0 I, CHERYL LAPOINTE, CLERK OF THE CITY OF SALEM, MASS. a 0 a 20.00 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN BY E i:__ _ THE SALEM PLANNING BOARD HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND 0- 00 Q I RECORDED AT THIS OFFICE AND NO APPEAL WAS RECEIVED DURING _ + + THE NEXT TWENTY DAYS AFTER SUCH RECEIPT AND RECORDING OF It� ~ F N LD N 00 V.C. V.C. 0In oo SAID NOTICE. IIS L = 50' L = 50' + ro 0 -- DATE CITY CLERK N(D o APptamR A m N w a� — PROPOSED CENTERLINE T_ STC 1200P1ee00[Concrete Storceptora 4 (12001!8 Gallon Ca"chy) APPROVED UNDER THE SUBDIVISION CONTROL LAW n Na 1.50% r 1' 10.00 7 s�.nnpa — Fes.e� -, 3M — _ S u 4 FrMIII Gra"a 2� pdR 9 LF 12" D.I. DRAIN S = 0.005 3— _ S = 0.005 J r 3" �ro � 70 LF 12" D.I. D AIN — - " S = 0.005 Z r - - - - EXISTING --� 110 LF 8: SDR 35 PVC SEWER �— — 42 LF 16" D.I. DRAIN 6" D. O rre F - r CENTERLINE S = 0.005 i p �'" -_ ,�., ! _ ---� I 142 LF 8: SDR 5 PVC SEWER ! I L`j w �n a.. DEFINITIVE SUBDIVISION PLAN 80 LF 8: SDR 35 PVC SEWER PW The Residences at Shallop Landing S = 0.005 0 =02 8" CL. 52 O.L.D.1. WATER MAIN pip 0.00 71* Drop T"+m Imenp0e s�� PW Vim SALEM , MASSACHUSETTS O 0N0 — e _ Plan & Profile Shallop Lane s V) N z^_ N w r Prepared For: Prepared By. N vl s o T O tD BOO =tDN J� O PLn � a-. � ^, M n Qj c0 O N W 0: O Dr o0 N Section Thu Chambw p J u NO o lel `u NO � �� `u Shal/op Landing LLC Eastern Land Survey Assoc., Inc. J ri — Z a0 — — (6(a �In — v — . 40 Lowell Street Christopher R. Mello P.L.S. iIto O m ° o N Z 1 The Uee Of Fletlhie CD wbm a Reonanaaea a The end aq 0"Whm 104 Lowell well St, Peabody, Mass, 01960 u7 f- U 11 v (n00 C/) ovesha 2 The Cr ,na be Pmmbc Dra The Oma Drop Pipe ab The van Pik Peabody, MA. 01960 y If) o > N j 06 m a.The swmepa sym n,a Horded by�«roan a ate f lowing us.Perera.w98514a, (978) 531-8121 M V + �I O` L d II 051901,05725780,05753115,ta8n9181.08068765.06371690. N o O -. < ComaC a M� na d " no eeenrOve«hew cli . mWle an idea m ere a awp C14 CS4 SCALE ai = : o o ai oil 0 o m m ov, 1 = 20' Horizon tal BASE = —10.00 Rinker materials/Iirttro Cmdaft Division w+w.rlekmmonerepormns 1 = 4 Vertical 13+0 +50 12+0 +50 11+0 +50 10+0 STATION 1 0 10 20 40 60 DA TE OCTOBER 9, 2009 Christopher R. Mello Clayton A. Morin PLS 31317 PE 30969 REVISIONS F 14611 1. NOVEMBER 25, 2009 2. DECEMBER 29, 2009 SHEET 5 OF 8 -' -- IN - R=12.00* DENOTES ELEVATION o PROFILE — SZETELA LANE UTILITIES TO MATCH EXISTING GRADE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN CONFORMS PLAN — EASEMENT TO THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE a Jz U Q REGISTERS OF DEEDS OF THE COMMONWEALTH O Exist. Surface Proposed Surface OF MASSACHUSETTS. IIIAr N ~ I1 U3Q 10.0 00 Q Q r' LOT 11 LOT 12 - - LOT 73 J W + 120 LF 12" D.I. DRAIN S=0.004 2 TYPICAL DETAIL 1 136 LF 8" SDR 35 PVC SEWER RETAINING WALLS S = 0.005 —_ 00 NO SCALELq in Z WATER Z m � = SERVICE (Typ) O o F- 0.00 8" Cl. 52 C.L.D.I. Water _ - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - F 0 FOR REGISTRY USE ONLY - - - - - - D 8" 'x 6" Reducer U.1 �o 7l D DMH 5y 6" Gate Valve W T- 0 I� STOR E R SS SS SCurblo (I ) & New Hydrant U O C) CAP UNIT ADHERES a S Cr _ _ TO TOP UNIT o --- Uj G 8" SDR 35 C SEWER - - S —MH 12— "ROUND DRAINAGE GRATE (Typ). y = io N 00 / = S+- LOK (n -- — -jII M - _ �0 CONCRETE ADHESIVE S 0 0 2 CL O DMH D — W— - o o L6 VERSA-LOK MODULAR � a _ W SMH u7 - - 8" CL. 52 CLDI WATER a) of V) CONCRETE UNITS Z% MIN. 0) Of (0 Obi z 2-45' Bends A N E O 11 E wj Restraint S Z E T E L L p BASE _ -10.00 \��\ \ W \�/\ 40 MIL IMPERVIOUS a w BARRIER 1 0-= �C) - 4" PERF. PVC _ : ;.;. '• — 3/4" STONE DETAIL — DRIVEWAY DRAINAGE INLET LOTS 11-13 —I I NO SCALE GRANULAR LEVELING PAD DETAIL — AREA DRAIN LOTS 1-4 MIN. 6" THICK NO SCALE 12" Round C.I. Grate E� PLAN — EASEMENT 8" Round PVC Grate HYDRANT TO BE PLgEEDS H A L L O P 4" LOAM OPPOSITE HIGH P,OINT -- Construction Notes OF WATER MgIN _ _--.L A IAV E 12" D.I. 8" PVC T 1. The existing 12 inch sewer from Fort Avenue to the site shall be cleaned, 16"x8" Tapping Sleeve t DMH_ SEE SHEET ( �) TV Camera inspected and, if demonstrated to be in satisfactory condition and 8" Gate Valve men // to the City of Salem, will remain in service. If not, the existing sewer A� shall be aced a new 3 (10"e, // 2. All work within existing streets Bshall Cbe done in accordance with the Salem 9 JJ // 8" PVC DRAIN Department of Public worls including restoration of disturbed surfaces. L� SMH 1.89 = 12+35 3. If any existing utilities are found on site, they will be abandoned in LOT 14 // To Drainage System 8"x8"x8" TEE accordance with the requirements of the Salem City Engineer. 90' Elbow 4. The existing 12 inch sewer in Fort Avenue from the manhole opposite Lots / 14 and 15 to Lee Fort Terrace shall be cleaned and TV Camera inspected. y S i/ ROOF DRAIN CONNECTION An deficiencies shall be reported to the City of Salem. Cr WITH OVERFLOW WYE 8: CL. 52 CLDI — - - — - - - /— WATER (TYP) _ 14 a - / / LOTS no scale E) 15 I, CHERYL LAPOINTE, CLERK OF THE CITY OF SALEM, MASS. Z SMH 0.30 S — HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN BY ROOF D OWNSPOUT THE SALEM PLANNING BOARD HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND 6 WYE RECORDED AT THIS OFFICE AND NO APPEAL WAS RECEIVED DURING sMH i.;o 7to) AIN DWELLING THE NEXT TWENTY DAYS AFTER SUCH RECEIPT AND RECORDING OF LL > I m 8" SDR 35 PVC SEWER (TYP) CIC SAID NOTICE. Q I Q FINISH GRADE 4" MAX. WQ 3 LOT 15 IVARIES 45• BEND - --_ DATE _ --_ -_ - CITY CLERK N TO RECHARGE SYSTEM APPROVED UNDER THE SUBDIVISION CONTROL LAW m ROOF RECHARGE BED V) EXISTING SURFACE w PROPOSED SURFACE DETAIL: No Scale 10.005-12"5-12" PERF. LIMIT OF - PIPE (TYP) RECHARGE - - - - - -- _ — (40' LONG) BED OBS. RECHARGE BEDS SHALL BE PROVIDED - -- - - - - - -- -- -- - FOR DWELLING ON LOTS 14 AND 15 1 WELL - - - - LOC. GAS SEE SHEET 4 0 8' Cl. EFINITIVE SUBDIVISION PLAN . 52 C.L.D.I. Water Uj 16" WATEL7 -_--- - -- - -- - SEENO2" S-EWER TE I -- -- - 0 z The Residences at Shallop Landing _ DETAIL - -- -- - ---- OBSERVATION WELL - -- -- — — - -- Ej- 80 LF 8" SDR 35 PVC 79 LF 8" SDR 35 PVC NTS - SALEM , MASSACHUSETTS SEWER S=.005 -- - -- — -- — — - -- - - -- --- O SEWER 5=.005 i - - - o.00 - - - - - - - - Plan & Profile — Easements w _ CLEANOUT WITH PLUG �- 42' Prepared For: Prepared BBB w --- '00 _ _ Shallop Landing LLC Eastern Land Survey Assoc., Inc. V) l Ill lll- ll� GEOTEXTILE FABRIC 40 Lowell Street Christopher R. Mello P.L.S. LINED EXCAVATION Peabody, MA. 01960 104 Lowell St, Peabody, Mass, 01960 ALL PIPE AND 4" LOAM AND SEED (MIN.) (978) 531-8121 N N �i K N r- 4" PIPE FITTINGS T❑ BE II � 11 TOP OF STONE SCH, 40 PVC SCALE , m - _ - r7 'j 1 = 20 Horizontal Uj N N 0 N ^ N N 4" INLET 12" DIAM. PERF. H.D.P.E. 1� = 4' Vertical o r 0 0 - II oC14 •• 4' PERF, PIPE o - ----- - + II + II + IICo J 0 10 20 40 60 o o + STONE UNDER PIPE TO ALLOW LIQUID TO ENTER BASE _ —10.00 � DATE 0 PROFILE — EASEMENT OCTOBER 9, 2009 Christopher R. Mello Clayton A. Morin PCS 31317 PE 30969 2' Min. 1 1/2" 70 3" WASHED STONE REVISIONS F 1 461 1 1. NOVEMBER 25, 2009 SHEET 6 of 9 2. DECEMBER 29, 2009 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN CONFORMS STORM DRAIN SANITARY SEWER WATER MAIN TO THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE REGISTERS OF DEEDS OF THE COMMONWEALTH DETAILTRENCH SECTION TRENCH SECTION TRENCH SECTION OF MASSACHUS TTS. MANHOLE no scale no scale no scale no scale 24" DIAM. MANHOLE FRAME AND COVER �l UNPAVED SALEM, MA. STANDARD, STAMPED DRAIN UNPAVED UNPAVED OR SEWER IN 3" CAST-IN LETTERS --- PAVEC PAVED - --- _.._ _ PAVED Full Mortar Bed - _ -_ 4" LOAM & SEED a" LOAM & SEED a" LOAM & SEED / MIRAFI No. 100 SEDIMENT 2 to 5 Courses Leveling Brick -_ 2"x2"x4'-6" WOODEN POSTS CONTROL FABRIC LIMIT OF TRENCH LIMIT OF TRENCH AT 8' O.C. (MAX) HAY BALES COMPACTED COMPACTED EXCAVATION - COMPACTED EXCAVATION - BACKFILL BACKFILL PROVIDE SHEETING BACKFILL PROVIDE SHEETING PRECAST CONCRETE CONE LIMIT OF TRENCH AND SHORING AS X AND SHORING AS FLOW DIRECTION .. : EXCAVATION - 6" 1' REQUIRED BY REQUIRED BY PROVIDE SHEETING _ — EXISTING GROUND PRECAST CONCRETE WALL SECTION AND SHORING AS LOCAL CONDITIONS. LOCAL CONDITIONS. 6" 1' (ROCK) (EARTH ( \\\\\ \ \ ( All Joints and Penetrations REQUILOCARCONDITIONS.ED BY FOR REGISTRY USE ONLY to be made fully Watertigit) (ROCK) (EARTH D D D Dpp 4' - 0" DRAIN O D p p D DETAIL FORGED ALUMINUM ALLOY EWER D O OD + 6" OD + 6" SAFETY TYPE MANHOLE p pp D o19- /z D p pDD _ EROSION CONTROL SILT FENCE STEP AT 12" O.C. p p D DD p D�D Q p pQ p p pDD pp —_ I I II —_ III D D Qpp ppp p p D p (6" IN LEDGE) O p p p 00 pD D 9" (6" IN LEDGE) 9" (6" IN LEDGE) II I I = II I l 1" CRUSHED p D D D STONE 1" CRUSHED SELECT BACKFILL INLET STONE NO STONE > 3" UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE 5" MIN OD + 2' OR 3' MIN. OD + 18" OR 3' MIN. oD + 18" OR 3' MIN. I DETAIL TYPICAL SECTION n, OUTLET SILT SOCK FOR EROSION CONTROL IMPERVIOUS CAP 1"z1',3' WOODEN POSTS AT 8' O.C. (MAX) no Scale CATCH BASIN FILTER DETAIL 5" MIN DETAIL DETAIL — CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE FLOW DIRECTION o coszbza��o�as $o _tom 12" DIAM. SILT SOCK 8FT o PRECAST CONCRETE BASE FIRE HYDRANT no scale no scale SLOPE MIN. 1/8-II• _ - / / (SEE SITE PLAN) SII IIIA ExISTINC GROUND BIT. CONC. SURFACE 5" 6' Crushed Stone _ n0 scale I II` II COPMPACTED BRICK INVERT _ III I� I (I� WARNING BARRIER ( ORANGE RECYCLED BIT. CONC. OR Foundation DARLING B 62 B PLAN I ��'� PLASTIC GRID FENCING) --- CLEAN GRAVEL FILL -_-_ 12" DETAIL 40' / vR V WOVEN FILTER FABRIC by HAYBALE CATCH BASIN fir Pumper Connection to Face Roadway � � O UPSTREAM CONTRIBUTARY AREA SHALL NOT EXCEED EXISTING MATERIAL TO REMAIN IN PLACE .25 AC. PER 100 LF OF SOCK FOR 12" DIAM. no scale �4 �4 SILT SOCK SHALL BE FILLED WTH A MIX OF 24" x 24" CAST IRON FRAME AND GRATE Q �� aaa 30-409 WEED FREE COMPOST AND 60 TO 70 % LEBARON LK 123 OR LK 124 l'-6" MIN. 3 �� a WOOD CHIPS. TYPICAL SECTION Full Mortar Bed " VEGETATED CAP Leveling Brick As Necessary 1 -S{o"e To 3" m TEMPORARY p p pp� 8" CONC. BLOCK a STEEL PLATE wI VV (TYP) no scale C, SLOPE MIN. 1/4" / FT(SEE SITE PLAN) c'6 4" PRECAST CONCRETE 4" LOAM AND SEED _ - Standard C.I. Road Box and Cover WARNING BARRIER ( ORANGE RECYCLED BIT. CONC. OR 4'-0" INSIDE DIAM. WALL SECTIONS N COPMPACTED 8 _ __� H7 DAIYBALE PLASTIC GRID FENCING) CLEAN GRAVEL FILL 24" OILS 8c DEBRIS STOP T „ _--_- --_ -_---_ KE LEBARON FOUNDARY INC. TEMPORARY 1-1/2" To 3" STEEL PLATE WOVEN FILTER FABRIC LEBARON OUTLET Subgrade Stone 4'" STONE 18R "SNOUT" MINIMUM CO R \ EXISTING MATERIAL TO REMAIN IN PLACE 8" x 6" • C.L.D.I. TEE 6" Gate Valve CONCRETE CATCH BASIN I, CHERYL LAPOINTE, CLERK OF THE CITY OF SALEM, MASS. HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN BY THRUST BLOCK DETAIL 4'-0" SUMP � VERTICAL GRANITE CURB THE SALEM PLANNING BOARD HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND RECORDED AT THIS OFFICE AND NO APPEAL WAS RECEIVED DURING nri N. T. S. _ - oa THE NEXT TWENTY DAYS AFTER SUCH RECEIPT AND RECORDING OF $ g o�ao Bob' o o �o NOTE - SILT SACKS MAY BE USED FOR CATCH BASIN SAID NOTICE. 000 6 MATERIAL PROTECTION IN LIEU OF THE FILTER DETAIL SHOWN PRECAST CONCRETE BASE TIE Roos 0 T I VARIES HEREON DATE CITY CLERK -- 6" CRUSHED STONE FOUNDATION -- _ ,z" Square By 4" Thick Stone or Concrete Base BITUMINOUS APPROVED UNDER THE SUBDIVISION CONTROL LAW PAVING — CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK H — GRANITE CURB - TYPICAL CROSS SECTION PROPOSED ROADWAY EROSION CONTROL PROGRAM DEFINITIVE SUBDIVISION PLAN no scale 1. STAKED HAY BALES, SILT FENCE, TEMPORAY DIVERSION SWALES AND SEDIMENT - - 32' LAYOUT ------- --_ -_ _ - -_ _ _ BASINS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS PLAN OR AS OTHERWISE The Residences at Shallop Landing DIRECTED BY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OR THE CONSERVATION COMMISSION PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 50 ADDITIONAL 4' — _ 24' -- 4_ _ a' HAY BALES AND 300 FT. OF SILT FENCE SHALL BE KEPT ON SITE FOR SALEM , MASSACHUSETTS SIDEWALK SIDEWALK REPAIRS OR OTHER EROSION CONTROL NEEDS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT EROSION CONTROL FACILITIES WEEKLY AND AFTER EVERY RAINFALL DETAILS EVENT TO CONFIRM THAT SAME ARE PROPERLY' FUNCTIONING. ANY DEFICIENCIES Pitch 3/8" per ft IN THE EROSION CONTROL FACILITIES SHALL BE CORRECTED IMMEDIATELY. / P L BIT. CONC. PAVEMENT, TYPE ND 2. ALL SOIL STOCKPILES SHALL BE PROTECTED AGAINST EROSION. Prepared For. Prepared By. Bit. Conc. Walk LAID IN TWO COURSES: 2 1/2" BINDER, ---- -- Type AND 1 1/2" FINISH 3. CATCH BASINS SHALL BE PROTECTED WITH FILTERS, AS SHOWN HEREON Shallop Landing LLC Eastern Land Survey Assoc., Inc. two courses Pitch 3/8 per foot UNTIL NO SEDIMENT TRANSPORT IS VISIBLE DURING RAINFALL EVENTS. FILTERS 40 Lowell Street Christopher R. Mello P.L.S. SHALL BE INSPECTED WEEKLY AND MAINTAINED AS NECESSARY. Peabody, MA. 01960 104 Lowell St, Peabody, Mass, 01960 4. TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES TO BE TAKEN DURING CONSTRUCTION (978) 531-8121 •12' Grave SHALL CONFORM WITH THE "MASSACHUSETTS EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL Foundation GUIDELINES, URBAN AND SUBURBAN AREAS" DATED MARCH, 1997, AND MAY SCALE INCLUDE SOME OR ALL OF THE FOLLOWING MEASURES: AS NOTEDTELEPHONE, ELECTRIC FIRE ALARM TEMPORARY SEEDING, TEMPORARY MULCHING (STRAW), PERMANENT AND CABLE (2'-6") MIN. COVER) 12" Gravel Base - No Stone Over 3" Dimension SEEDING, HYDROSEEDING, SODDING, AND PLACEMENT OF HAY OR 1\ 000 JUTE NETTING DURING WINTER MONTHS. r " 5. DEBRIS AND/OR UTTER SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE ON A WEEKLY Approved Subgrade BASIS, V VERTICAL 0 INCHES 2 3 6. IF DUST IS GENERATED DURING CONSTRUCTION, IT SHALL BE CONTROLLED ll GRANITE CURB 10' MINIMUM BY USE OF WATER TRUCKS, SPRINKLING OR TEMPORARY STABILIZATION DATE /111 4"x 12" STORM DRAIN METHODS. OCTOBER 9, 2009 Christopher R. Mello CIO on A. Morin O 3' Min. Cover 7. AT THE COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT, ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE PLS 31317 PE 30969 8" diam Water PERMANENTLY STABILIZED WITH LOAM AND SEED OR OTHER GROUND COVER. F 14611 8" diom. Gravity Sewer O 5' Min. Cover REVISIONS or SCH 40 Pressure Sewer NOVEMBER 25, 2009 O CEMBER 29, 2009 SHEET 7 OF 8 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN CONFORMS C O L L I N S C O V E DETAIL LEVEL SPREADER TO THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE AT OVERFLOW PIPE END REGISTERS OF DEEDS OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS. TI D A L ) .0 SCALF PROPOSED RIPRAP AT PIPE OUTLET SHALL NOT EXTEND OUTFLOW 01PF BEYOND THE LINE OF THE -� - - - EXISTING RIPRAP 12"- STONE RIPRAP --- — 1% SLOPE FROM PIPE END <=� y \ 15' HIGH W MEAN HIGH _--_ _�- STONE BANK I TOP OF BANK ��„ $ r 8' cr o EXISTING RIPRAP EMBANKMENT 0 FOR REGISTRY USE ONLY - - N - - 84" S.E.S.D. INTERCEPTOR SEWER S Z E T E L A L A N E EXISTAND ING OUB`EDON _ NEW DMH TO REPLACE DETAIL AT END OF 24" DRAIN C r o.9a _ -- NO SCALE E S `7 G \ DMH 985 DMH_ --_--_ -D -- -- E FLANGE MOUNTED TIDE GATE 2-30 DMH 24" D.I. DRAIN -- -- - - - 00' BUFFER 'ZONE BOUNDARY M N 0 / 2" CLEAR mIN. CD I o 0 (A/ V v - " J HAIGIS \ F FREERICK W' aCIV Q ' PLACED STONE RIPRAP (12" MIN. DIM.) �JI N/ o ° � o w Pgg1 i 05O ` PROPOSED TIDE GATE SHALL BE OF CAST IRON CONSTRUCTION WITH BRONZE OR R �• STAINLESS STEEL HARDWEAR AND A NEOPRENE SEAT. TIDE GATE SHALL BE EQUIVALENT �PG R15E5 R J - TO THE PRODUCT OF KENNEDY VALVE OF ELMIRA, N.Y. OR AS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. R Z _ � � O 00 —� h I \ I I, CHERYL LAPOINTE, CLERK OF THE CITY OF SALEM, MASS. HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN BY 6 THE SALEM PLANNING BOARD HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND • I I RECORDED AT THIS OFFICE AND NO APPEAL WAS RECEIVED DURING THE NEXT TWENTY DAYS AFTER SUCH RECEIPT AND RECORDING OF m T �S �� SAID NOTICE. -_ DATE CITY CLERK T71, N) APPROVED UNDER THE SUBDIVISION CONTROL LAW 0 O Phf�� - - - -- - - - - - -- 1 O.00- -- =XISTING SURFACE DEFINITIVE SUBDIVISION PLAN \ --- p 18„ CL. "I The Residences at Shallop Landing 8” CL. III RC DRAIN - RC DRAIN 18" CL. III RC DRAIN S 0.008NEWT TIDE GA E S =0.005 --- S = 0.008 70 F24" D.I. DRAIN l SALEM , MASSACHUSETTS S = 0.004 Q 0.00 RIPRAP OFFSITE DRAINAGE ALAN --- w Prepared For: Prepared By. w Sha//op Landing LLC Eastern Land Survey Assoc., Inc. o m 40 Lowell Street Christopher R. Mello P.L.S. Z Peabody, MA. 01960 104 Lowell St, Peabody, Mass, 01960 " N �� W ,`v i (978) 531-8121 = a ._ n O O NN : N m Ca w O O U n n UNN SCALE CIDo o - _ a 0 1 = 40 Horizontal g m w CD D w N z 1m = 4' Vertical0 L6 0 - Q O w - v, o o - --- - \\ CD - m o 0 0 0 00 mm Ln ASI + 'Zr l0 M In c� N 0 20 40 80 80 BASE _ -10.00 DATE NOVEMBER 3, 2009 Christopher R. Mello Clayton A. Morin PLS 31317 PE 30969 REVISIONS F 14611 PROFILE — STORM DRAIN 1, DECEMBER 29, 2009 SHEET 8 OF 8