Loading...
2A LINDEN STREET - BUILDING INSPECTION 2A LINDEN STREET Citp of *alem, Aiag!garbuattz ` j3ubli[ Aropertp Department �3uilbing Department one balem &reen (976) 745-9595 Cxt. 38O Peter Strout Director of Public Property Inspector of Buildings Zoning Enforcement Officer May 17, 2000 William Fouhey 10 Brentwood Circle Danvers, Ma. 01923 RE: 2 Linden Street Dear Mr. Fouhey: This department is receiving complaints about the above mentioned property. The complaint and our inspection show that a contractor, "Tanner City"is running a business out of this address. This violates Salem Zoning Ordinance, 5-2 permitted uses in an R-2 area. You are directed to cease this operation immediately. Please contact this office within ten(10) days upon receipt of this letter. Failure to comply will result in legal action being filed in Salem District Court. Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, Thomas St. Pierre Local Building Inspector cc: Mayor Usovicz Councillor Driscoll ausrness Lertlncate o Citp of batem, AIaggact gettg 6 FOR YOUR DATE FILED Type: Ca New Expiration Date ❑ Renewal, no change ❑ Renewal with change In conformity with the provisions of Chapter one hundred and ten, Section five of the Massachusetts General Laws, as ended the undersigned hereby declare(s) that a business is conducted under the title of: t'tNY , �Tl,✓'U at. / i �l�r ,� � �o Ncr-7n type of business IA P n L'n)-)a -4 -> n Y-/x-w+M ,vt by the following named person(s): (Include corporate name and title if corporate officer) J ab—O_ Full Name Residence a , .k iYa 7A Q b—O,hLiy,41 )4 y-ti jj 3+ �v. IPw7l1la� (p1ci7c Y-\'0 M . 'Ro1. 1z Nn C1 Pv1 -s+ slam M4 n IC�i r_n - - -- -- ----------------- --t--� 1924he above named penon(s) personally appeared before me and made an oath that the foregoing statement is true. �� � _ ---------------------------------------- - --------------------------------------------------- -- CITY CLERK Notary Public (seal) Date Commission Expires Identification Presented Lau 14brn hay. > o S3-7� - 7 34 G 31- 6? -`Q 19 State Tax I.D. # S.S. # (if available) IT—OM h `)o l97 Cate In accordance with the provision of Chapter 337 of the Acts of 1985 and Chapter 110, Section 5, of Mass. General Laws, business certificates shall be in effect fc:our(4) years from the date of issue and shall be renewed each four years thereafter. A statement under oath must be filed with the town clerk upon discontinuing, retiring, or withdrawing from such business or partnership. Copies of such certificates shall be available at the address at which such business is conducted and shall be furnished on request during regular business hours to any person who has purchased goods or services from such business. Violations are subject to a fine of not more than three hundred dollars ($300.00) for each month during which lsuch violation continues. �' fitu of �IPm, �ry11c�55c�t�t115Pft5 �3 l F:ECEIVPn Poarb of tA'apud ., 065 APR 30, P 3 :03 DECISION ON THE PETITION OF LUCILLE A. CYR FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR 2A LINDEN—STl, SALEM, CITY CLERK'S OFFICE A hearing on this petition was held April 17, 19-5 with the following Board Member: present: James Hacker, Chairman; Messrs. , Charnas, Gauthier, Luzinski and Associate Member Bencal. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petition requests a Special Permit to convert an existing., two family dwelling into a three family dwelling in the R-2 district. Petitioner owns the subject property The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request for a Special Permit is Section V B 10, which provides as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Section VIII F and IY. D, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighbohrood. In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests,. guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. The Board of Appeal, after hearing the evidence presented at the hearing and after viewing plans of the property, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . No opposition was presented to the plan.; 2. Adequate on premises parking will be provided; 3. The dwelling will be owner occupied; 4. The are already has a significant number of three family dwellings. On the basis of the above findings of fact and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeals concludes that the proposal does not depart from the intent and purpose of the Ordinance, and is not substantially detrimental to the public good. r _ DECISION ON THE ?=_lTION OF LUCILLE A. CYR FOP, A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR 2A LINDEN ST. , SALEM page two Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted 4-0 ( 'r. Hacker voting present) to grant the relief requested, provided that: T Smoke detectors appropriate _`cr a three . ami_y dwelling are installed and plans for SCC❑ =nstallaticn are provided to the Fire Prevention Bureau; 2. The P=-' ses are owner occupied; 3. A minirur of five (5) parking spaces are provided on the premises; 4 . A Certificate of Occupancy is obtained. SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED i Scott E. Charnas, Secretary A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK of THE V, hT TO SABER THE DATE OF i1L11'S c PURSJA' S"k APPEAL FRD:I, THIS Dc�col SG5!FANDYSH;.L1LEEgFc n• CLERK. ZD DA cS VARIA,E DR �? THE GEFT,IT FI,-CU :` PER'.. \q'S. CHAP THE OFF'-.CE OF TSP r SEEi:�7; 11. T^,_�15��:'.,. E�,.....n�c• FIiED GE::RAL DECISION . ,.c [.'�A:., P.:S. r?Y 0: THE c' HAS EE_.� OF TBI$ DEC c GE ^.'n._ v.., cFiELT Ut:Ttl A C.�x:� Ar:;9 .i A'P�Acp CF LE;SED IS L'.A_S. _ TCY.c HF�E ELF..-HSS gEE:: DIS' ';.S_ ..E of ISE OWNER PURSA•" TO HALL t�, DAtS DEF 7HE"h^,.. t TED HERE'N' S . CLER`. -,PA' 20 tHAT IT INDEXED O7; 05 GRA; Olii HFS EEE�1 FILE. A;;D OF TIT%►• tlt FICATIOt7 OF T JE H A� APPEAL 15TRi Of 6cEDS OERTIFICATE N� OR THAT. IFS ESSEX RROTED ON THE OWNERS BOE pPl ('TI RECORDED 111 THE SO'J(H + J OF REGARD OR IS RECORDED AND T� W O I Ln C T rM �' s Law Offices DECOULOS & DECOULOS 248 Andover Street at Willowdale Lane Peabody, Massachusetts 01960 Tel. (508) 532-1020 © Nicholas J. Decoulos C James N. Decoulos -G r -n c y cn c� (D � �rn September 11, 1991 n w m L a � Loc N � City of Salem Building Inspector One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Dear Sir: Please be advised that this office represents Lucille A. Cyr, who is the owner of one of the condominiums located at:C 7 ��den Street: Enclosed please find a copy of a decision for a special permit which was granted by the Board of Appeals. My client wants to sell her condominium which is located on the first floor and is concerned that condition #2 would prevent her from selling the property unless that person actually lives on the premises. It is my opinion that such a condition is not in accordance with General Laws Chapter 40A. Special permits and variances run with the land and not with the person who happens to own the property at the time that they are granted. I would appreciate it if you would review this matter, and I will be happy to further discuss this with you at your convenience. Very truly yours, DECOULOS & DECOULOS Nicholas J. Decoulos NJD/aw Enc. 'v 04 9-�o cI .i Law Offices DECOULOS & DECOULOS 248 Andover Street at Willowdale Lane Peabody, Massachusetts 01960 Tel. (508) 532-1020 Nicholas J.Decoulos James N.Decoulos October 11, 1991 City of Salem Building Inspector One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Dear Sir: Enclosed please find a copy of my letter dated September 11, 1991, which I understand you did not receive. I would ask that you review that letter and contact me at your first convenience. Thank you. Very truly yours, DE�COULOOS & DECOOUULOSS Nichola J. Decoulos NJD/aw Enc. cc: Kevin T. Daly, City Solicitor Lucille A. Cyr CHC of ,-5ttlem, ��assar4usetts Pottrb of � ren1 F:ECEI\QED '85 APR 30 P 3 :03 DECISION ON THE PETITION OF LUCILLE A. CYR FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR 2A LINDEN ST. , SALEM CITY CLERK-S OFFICE SALEM A hearing on this petition was held April 17, 1985 with the following Board Members present: James Hacker, Chairman; Messrs. , Charnas, Gauthier, Luzinski and Associate Member Bencal. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petition requests a Special Permit to convert an existing two family dwelling into a three family dwelling in the R-2 district. Petitioner owns the subject property. The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request for a Special Permit is Section V B 10, which provides as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Section VIII F and IY. D, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighbohrood. In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests,, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. The Board of Appeal, after hearing the evidence presented at the hearing and after viewing clans of the property, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . No opposition was presented to the plan; 2. Adequate on premises parking will be provided; 3. The dwelling will be owner occupied; 4 . The are already has a significant number of three family dwellings. On the basis of the above findings of fact and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeals concludes that the proposal does not depart from the intent and purpose of the Ordinance, and is not substantially detrimental, to the public good. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF LUCILLE A. CYR FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR 2A LINDEN ST. , SALEM page two Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted 4-0 (Mr. Hacker voting present) to grant the relief requested, provided that: 1 . Smoke detectors appropriate for a three family dwelling are installed and plans for such installation are provided to the Fir2 Prevention Bureau; 2. The premises are owner occupied; Gt 3�� �r�iv ta.• ?o"� :3 3 . A minimum of five (5) parking spaces are provided on the premises; 4 . A Certificate of Occupancy is obtained. SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED Scott E. Charnas, Secretary A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK •.t'1 TICR Of THE Ii.ASS. pF F 'I TO SECS � .r I% FI;V'. SHALL 6E !�'.NO, _H^�„ ,DAPS AFTER THE DATE IT APPEAL FRO�' THIS D CI`r,C�:.0 ARD C'H ALL sC FCI'fY CLEP.Y. c A�FRI:.`:CE CC c�cilAl F[F.T IIS. cHAPT E,. EE F TF,� TH. EE:.,11,6 T'dE THE OF`•' E D - �iJl c FI'_ED. GEREFAL L .� .F"EP f c TH uAS t,c OF ThIS DECISIG'� I c :=,AL - T A C^PY D q,.; ;: N EA_ C ..IED IS EF(ECI E sEe GR ..E OF THE p4NcR PURS"'I TG S•H¢,LL pAV� HA:E Ei..,S--_ 6EE;1 DIS..,.. HEREII; ,q`, 2` qF,;,1 IT gA: DP;DER iHF's;„". GP,A!:T ED }I. rc>; FILE p Ir;DEXED TITi4 CII Hr.S c_•. DEEDS A;L FIGATIDR OF THC H A.Y. APPL:.' <ISSR° CF g CERTIFICATE CF�� � .. OR TRAY. IF Slit. - ESSET RE.. T.HE pVIItER R'1 II. THE SD;LH HDTED DU ROAFbF AP{ RECORDED IS RECDROED AtiD mm l J OF RECORD oil = :� < �o _V 1. F) M w 7 itvn of ,�alvm, �fflneEiarh nft5 o z \.Y JJ J �nx:D of CAue41 RECcI\1En. 185 APR 30 P3 :03 DECISION ON THE PETITION OF LUCILLE A. CYR FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT FOP. 2A LIN'DEN ST. , SALEM CITY CLERF.'S OFFICE SALEh1 ` kS7. A hearing on this petition was held April 17, 1935 with the following Board Member. present: James Hacker, Chairman; M,essrs. , Charnas, Gauthier, Luzinski and Associate Member Bencal. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petition requests a Special Permit to convert an existing two family dwelling into a three family dwelling in the R-2 district. Petitioner owns the subject property The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request for a Special Permit is Section V B 10, which provides as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Section VIII F and IY. D, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighbohrood. In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon. a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City' s inhabitants. The Board of Appeal; after hearing the evidence presenter; at the hearing and after viewing plans of the property, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . No opposition was presented to the plan.; 2. Adequate on premises parking will be provided; 3. The dwelling will be owner occupied; 4. The are already has a significant number of three family dwellings. On the basis of the above findings of fact and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeals concludes that the proposal does not depart from the intent and purpose of the Ordinance, and is not substantially detrimental to the public good. DECISIO;' ON THE PETITION OF LUCILLE A. CYR FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR 2A LINDEN ST. , SALEM page two Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted 4-0 ('L^. Hacker voting present) to grant the relief requested, provided teat: 1 . Smoke detectors appropriate fcr a three family dwelling are installed and plans for s',:ch installation are provided to the Fire Prevention Bureau; 2. The premises are owner occupied; 3. A minimum of five (5) parking spaces are provided on the premises; 4 . A Certificate of Occupancy is obtained. SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED Scott E. Charnas, Secretary A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK OF THE NASS. 10 SELTION ET DATE OF FILII':G LL BE MADE rURSUANDA S AFIER THE -CISIDN. IF At:Y. SNA BE F..ED \':ITH1y 2D coc_C.I AL PER' ;.IT c L FRO'. THIS D° G AND SHALL G,N CLERK. c VARiA"!LE OF! TgE CERT• APPA CHApTEP. SL THE TH_ - i u p(P.LE OF q SE;T',�p; 11. -ry51=:`.. EE •' . FILED. THE . ,.c L:,i FF EP. Y..S. ALC? OF THc 1'`'A=PEAL HAS L__,•cG IS OF THJS DECISION c •,A'_ �,.. UNTIL A,:;, c CR CE:a- R t!,.Acg. G:� . E'FELT c ELM JCEJ IS. tSS_U OF THE 0"" PURSA!:T TD SHALL N.'T T``•'- cGAYFILE�IhAT lT HAS B`aED UDDER THF�;A;:.E GRA JED HEREIN. -,pA'I 2C LIT7 LLER`- E Ey �S AFiD It GF TIT%►• V7 FICATION OF THE H AN APPEAL HAS ISTR+ OF OEC` g CERTIFICATE N.{ SLDIH ESSE> RE' THE OWNER >�F APF M OR THAT. IF SOC ND NOTED ON RECORDED IN THE OF RECORD OR IS RECORDED A B TM O N C "1• n � rn w `�t f ifu of �Iem, {�sGrkuseffs �3 F:7CEFn t '65 kN 30 P3 :03 DECISION ON THE PETITION OF LUCILLE A. CYR FOR SPECIAL PERMIT FOR 2A LINDEN ST. , S."LEM, CITY CLERV'S OFFICE SAL Eh " ..ASS A hearing on this petition was held April 17, ' 'E5 with the following Board N,ember: present: James Hacker, Chairman; Messrs. , Charnas, Gauthier, Luzinski and Associate Member Bencal. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petition requests a Special Permit to convert an existing two family dwelling into a three family dwelling in the R-2 district. Petitioner owns the subject property The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request for a Special Permit is Section V B 10, which provides as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Section VIII F and IY. D, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighbohrood. In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City' s inhabitants. The Board of Appeal , after hearing the evidence presented at the hearing and after viewing plans of the property, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . No opposition was presented to the plan.; 2. Adequate on premises parking will be provided; 3. The dwelling will be owner occupied; 4. The are already has a significant number of three family dwellings. On the basis of the above findings of fact and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeals concludes that the proposal does not depart from the intent and purpose of the Ordinance, and is not substantially detrimental to the public good. DECISION ON THE ?-TITIOt, OF LUCILLE A . CYR FOP, A SPECIAL P'ERi'= FOR 2A LINDEN ST. , SALEM page two Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted 4-0 ( `.^• Hacker voting present) to grant the relief requested, provided that: 1 . Smoke cetectors appropriate fcr a three `a;.ily dwelling are instai_ec and plans for Sigh _nstallat-cn are provided to tie Fire Prevention Bureau; 2. The premises are owner occupied; 3. A minirur.. of five (5) parking spaces are provided on the premises; 4 . A Certificate of Occupancy is obtained. SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED Scott E. Charnas, Secretary A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK THF NASS. TD SECTION 17 OF OF 11111:0 ll 8E N.ADF PURSJAN PAYS ARER THE DATE IF. ANY. C;ITH cnc Gl Al PER',R APP°-�`L FRO'f. THIS O TER SGL. pNG SHAl1 hE F�;N CLERK. 2 T,dF VARIA"ICF Or THF DEFT• \i 5. CHAPIN THE Of"{GE OF r SEC"^?; 11, - c ..., SE;,..,,. c GE'..rR;l pEG510 ' . ,c C'.;A:'.EP. A CnPY OF THc"..,c p.PEh'. H^S S':+cp IS DECISION OF THIS c CFS-'A` ��.. FFFEGT Ur:T,I �r A':u cScp CR r, THE OV, t2 A_S. p-1 T;`.:- c HA\E ASL"1�-HAS SEE;: OF PURS;!:E TO GITAICIFR` }P.pT 20 GA1_ U DFR THE-j; GRAY.TED HEREIt:, c 1 FILE. TH^S ACID IY,DERED E E` , OF DEE. CERTIFICATE CF TIT:► lTt FICAT1ON OF THE H AN APPEAL HAS ISTR, OR THAT, IF S'J'J ESSEY. RE'. T.HE till >�F FP IT M nEp IN THE SGJIH S, I ON RECOR. OR IS RECORDED AND Ba nrn j Of RECORD 17 W r � O C'/N C:) 7 n r7 T A O rn w / of �olem, Cfo55achusetts RECcI\� Fn Poarb of �Fpenl - '85 APR 30 P3 :03 DECISION ON THE PETITION OF LUCILLE A. CYR FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR 2A LINDEN ST. , SALEM CITY CLERK*$ OFFICE SALEM ':.kI. A hearing on this petition was held April 17, 1935 with the following Board Members present: James Hacker, Chairman; Messrs. , Charnas, Gauthier, Luzinski and Associate Member Bercal. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petition requests a Special Permit to convert an existing two family dwelling into a three family dwelling in the R-2 district. Petitioner owns the subject property. The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request for a Special Permit is Section V B 10, which provides as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Section VIII F and IX D, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change, extension, i enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighbohrood. In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests,. guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon. a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. The Board of Appeal; after hearing the evidence presented at the hearing and after viewing plans of the property, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . No opposition was presented to the plan; 2. Adequate on premises parking will be provided; 3. The dwelling will be owner occupied; 4. The are already has a significant number of three family dwellings. On the basis of the above findings of fact and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeals concludes that the proposal does not depart from the intent and purpose of the Ordinance, and is not substantially detrimental to the public good. C a DECISION ON THE PETITION OF LUCILLE A. CYR FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR 2A LINDEN ST. , SALEM page two Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted 4-0 (Mr. Hacker voting present) to grant the relief requested, provided that: 1 . Smoke detectors appropriate for a three family dwelling are installed and plans for such installation are provided to the Fire Prevention Bureau; 2. The premises are owner occupied; 3. A minimum of five (5) parking spaces are provided on the premises; 4 . A Certificate of Occupancy is obtained. SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED Scott E. Charnas, Secretary A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK . OF THE N,ASS. TD SECTER THE DATE OF ittll:G BE N•AD- PURSUANDAYS AFT e n IF AfiY, SHALL \Vl-µ1;y 20 PER'Al DECL,I�N' µ;.LL BE Fi'ED CDC, F7EAL FRO''\i SHVIS TEP. SCG. PND S THE C-,n SELERK 7Hc VAStA"ICE OR cTH FtC D7. CHAPIN THE Or"CE OF v' 11. GE!:BAL LA 5. A Cr'FY O: } -�c� H.4S TP.IS DECISION ,•c C,IAFTER Y.. TH' A:7EAt --'CD IS GF r c GES-?.A. ��..v' EFFECT UNTIL ?SEJ A.d'J c OR CE;,- cq PURSAN�T 70 LSA-SSHALL ti;:T T4_c DANS HA`E TIT HAS 6EFt1 DIS:'ps� DµFjdAL,E OF VE OGN.. HEREtN. LEF`.• TI'•aT 2C p.: GRAY.TEO 0 I t C µAS EcEy FILE. 7H DS ANp INDEXED TI77.4 l�Tt FICATION OF THEH AN PPPEAI 'ISTR� OF DEEDS CERTIFICATE CFN� OR THAT. IF SUS FES THE > rr, IN THE SG'jiH ESSEX µpiED ON BORR�F AP RECORDED R is RECORDED AHD rnm J OF RECORD D s N O NO W r7 rn w i Tituof Wvm, �fflnEinc4usetts 0;! YY' r• F;ECENED '85 APR 30 P3 :03 DECISION ON THE PETITION OF LUCILLE A. CYR FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR 2A LINDEN ST. , SALE'; CITY CLERf.'S OFFICE SAL Er; * 4�I': A hearing on this petition was held April 17, '. 9 5 with the following Board Member. present: James Hacker, Chairman; Messrs. , Charnas, Gauthier, Luzinski and Associate Member Bencal. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petition requests a Special Permit to convert an existing two family dwelling into a three family dwelling in the R-2 district. Petitioner owns the subject property The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request for a Special Permit is Section V B 10, which provides as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Section VIII F and IX D, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighbohrood. In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. The Board of Appeal, after hearing the evidence presented at the hearing and after viewing plans of the property, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . No opposition was presented to the plan; 2. Adequate on premises parking will be provided; 3. The dwelling will be owner occupied; 4. The are already has a significant number of three family dwellings. On the basis of the above findings of fact and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeals concludes that the proposal does not depart from the intent and purpose of the Ordinance, and is not substantially detrimental to the public good. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF LUCILLE A. CYR FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR 2A LINDEN ST. , SALEM page two Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted 4-0 ( fr. Hacker voting present) to grant the relief reouested, provided that: 1 . Smoke detectors appropriate fcr a three _`=, ly dwelling are installed and plans for s'.:ch installation are provided to the Fire Prevention Bureau; 2. The premises are owner occupied; 3. A. minimurr. of five (5) parking spaces are provided on the premises; 4 . A Certificate of Occupancy is obtained. SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED Scott E. Charnas, Secretary A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK 17 OF THE NASS. SECTION DATE Of i1111':G K.ADE PURSUp1iT TD OFFER THE AFPEAL FRO RPI THIS O l�P SIC.IfANDYSH^ALBEBFC.TM CLERK 20 DAcSVARIA"wE DR 'PETHE CERT�rc c OF THE TH` EE:,f ilG [ R.I. AHS. CHAPIN THE OFF` r5. SE.TI r15:.1:. [ FI'�_D• T • OF TYJS DECISION GJ;_r c Ef ELT U, UhTII A Or'nc.9'pH 1:2'A=7EhLD.AS G'-�[G IS THE OWNS, if TO t..-1 TA`.. DAYS HAthAT R HAS 6EE" D�.tO[R THF7`A...E Cd S HAIL PUBS IN g tTEO HERTHE CITi CL "i1'.a' `"[ V FILE. It:DEXED GRA' 11 OF NAS 5-E` OF DEEDS pE.D o_.c tJ1 FIGATIO RE';151R' T'HE OWNER'S CERTIFICATE GFy� OR THAT. IF S'J';H S, PPPESSE> IN THE SOJtH I:OTED ON BOxFbf APPS- FTI RECORDED OR IS RcCOROED pHD rnrn :7 OF RECORD 3 WC _ (n rn A J rn w w' ,41-1920 r v by D / 9�� 7z