The URL can be used to link to this page

64-231 - 224-234 HIGHLAND AVENUE - CONSERVATION COMMISSION 64-231 Pep Boys-Applebee6 . 224-234 Highland Ave. -cy � I if i 7 'I Contains a minimum of 50 post-consumer recycled fibers I- 07/12/96 FRI 12:54 FAX 508 741 4683 SMFINI&DARLING -.++ PLANNING X002 CDW CONSULTANTS, INC. CML a ENMONMENrAt ENGINEERS June 27, 1996 Salem Conservation Commission City Hall Salem,MA 01970 RE: Proposed Pep Boys site-224 and 234 Highland Avenue DEP File No_ 64-231 Dear Commission Members: The final approved site plan by the City of Salem Planning Board included changes to the Proposed use in the land area south of the proposed Pep Boys. Originally,the site had been designed for a restuarant and associated parking. The final plan was designed for a car wash and drive thru coffee shop. The overall drainage characteristics have not changed. The proposed detention system on the Pep Boys site has remained unchanged. No changes were made within the buffer zone of the vegetated wetlands. We believe,therefore,that the changes to the approved plans by the commission are minor and have no additional impact on the resource area or the buffer zone to the resource area. Please contact us if you have any questions. Very truly Yours, CDW CONSULTANTS,INC. Md toM. Walker,P.E. ripal 111 Speen S"K Suite 119, Framingham,MA 01701 (508)875-2657 FAX (508)875.6617 s 310 CHIC 10.99 DFP File No. 64.-231 ^ (To be provided by DEP) l—{v� Form 5 �n.� SALEM a .Kannw.dy DEK- Fr JJ na,n,_ nc. �\ co®onwaalt6 130-178 j�e n� 0294 ? +€ of Xasaachuaetts 3 1 8 � % � a 4 Order of Conditions Massachuetts Wetlauds Protectio$6,0t95 11(57 Inst .313 G.L. C. 131r 540 SALEM CONSERVATIQN COMMISSION Issuing Authority From n 11.571 r..a. 7013 06..ro�,.�5 �1vJ( tti�t Jia To Kennedy Development r T,,,, Joseph A FinocNio` (Name of Applicant) (Name of property owner) 500 Broadway 2 Perkins Row, Topsfield, MA 01983 Address Fv^ratt mA n2l4g. Address This order is issued and'delivered as fo11o•.Fa t ❑ by hand delivery to applicant or representative on (date) by certified mail, return receipt requested on June 27, 1995 _(date) This project is located at 224 and 234 Hiehland Aon The property is recorded at the Registry of Essex South Book 120: 11555 Page 0 008 certificate (if registered) The Notice of Intent for this project was filed on March look (date) The public hearing was closed on June 22, 1995 (date) Findings The - Commission has reviewed the stime•referenced Notice of Intent and plans and las hod • public hearing on the project. available to the Commission at this Based-on the information time, mm the Coi asi nn has determined that the area on which the proposed work is to be char is 8ion lficant to the following interests in accordance with the presumptions of atgniffeanee sac forth in the regulations for each Arco subject to protection under the Act (check as appropriate): Pub lic water supply 7i Flood control land containing shellfish private water supply Stam damage prevention .Fisheries Groundwater supply prevention of pollution protection of Wildlife Habitat Total Filing Fee Submitted 5575 nn State Share $250.00 (t/2 fee in excess of $25) City/Town share $275.00 Total Refund Dues 525.nn _ _City/Town portion S 275.00 State portions 250.00 (1/2 total) (t/2 total) i'v l~1, AUG p g ivy) Sal= r1wa lwa u0pt. Effective 11/10/89 5-1 BK 13078 PG 295 Therefore, the hereby finds that the following conditions are necessary, in accor ance with the Performance standards net forth.in the regulations, to protect those interests checked above. The Comm;cG;� orders that_all work shall be performed in accordance with said conditimas and with thejNoticecof Intent referenced above. To the extent that the following conditicne modify or differ from the plans, specifications or other proposals ` ! submitted+vith':the Notice of intent, the conditions shall control. General Conditions 1. Failure to comply with all conditions stated herein, and with all related statutes and other regulatory measures, shall be deemed cause to revoke or modify this order. '�! t Fn%LX' %M or any 2: The)order'does notgrantany jury to privates property orlinvasionlof egos; it does not authorize any injury private rights. , 3. This order does not relieve the permittee or any other person of the necessity of eomplyinqq with all other applicable federal, state or local statutes, ordinances,`by-laws or regulations. 6. The work authorized hereunder shall be completed within three years from the date of thin order unless either of henot sewing provided for in the. (a) the work is a maintenance dredging project Act; or (b) thant hreeoyears , but less athan nfive eyears,nded ofrom specified the date of issuance and both that date and the special circumstances warranting the extended time period are set forth in this order. 5. This order may be extended by the issuing authority for one or more periods of up to three years each upon application to the issuing authority at least 30 days prior to the expiration date of the order. 6. Any fill used in connection with this project shall be clean fill, containing no trash, refuse, rubbish or debris, including butenoti=invited to lumber, bricks, plaster, wire, lath, paper, cardboard, pip , ashes, refrigerators, motor vehicles or parts of any of the foregoing. 7. No work shall be undertaken until all administrative appeal periods from pthis order-have roceedings beforeathedor, if Departmentch an apl,has.beehave beenacompleteda. filed, until all 8. No work shall be undertaken until the Final order has been recorded in the Registry of Deeds or the Land Court for the district in which the land is located, within the chain of title of the affected .property. In the case of recorded land, the Final order shall also be noted in the Registry's Grantor Index under the name of the owner of the land upon which the proposed work is to. be done. in the case of registered land, the- Final- order shall also be noted on the Land court Certificate of Title of the owner of the land upon which the be proposed work is to be done. The theoformgatnfothemend nofhall this order submitted to the prior to commencement o e work. 9. A sign shall be displayed at the site not lose than two square feet or more than three square feet in size bearing the words, •NassachusetGts Department of Environmental Protection, File Number 10. where the Department of Environmental Protection is requested to make a determination and to issue a superseding order, theConservationgs before Commission shall be a party to all agency proceedings the Department. 5-2 09 ON8 BK 13078 PG 49 Plans: Title Dated signed and stamped by: on Pile with: special conditions (Ae additional paper if necessary) (Leave, space. Blank) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . ... 5-3B BK 13078 PG 296 11. upon completion of the work described herein, the applicant shall forthwith request in writing that a Certificate of Compliance be issued stating that the work has been satisfactorily completed. 12. The work shall conform to the following plans and special conditions: Plans: Title Dated signed and stamped by: on File with: A. Narrative B. USGS Locus p C. Site Plan - Pen RnWs -Co s eet L-01, Grading & Utilities Sheet L-02 Erosion Control Sheet T-09e T ., .. a s met L-03, and yT p�Details Sheet L-04, prepared by CDW Assoc' ted March 17, 1995, rev:. March 41 1 , 9 d revised May 23, 1995., Plans are o—n i�ith the Conservation Commission. special conditions (Use additional paper .if.necessary) See attached special conditions. (Leave space Blank) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 5-3A q E; gI X13 BK 1301n� F� �� issued by the Department of Environmental protection Signature on this day of 19 , before me personally appeared to me known to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she executed the same as his/her free act and deed. Notary public MY coDmhission expires The applicant, the Ower. any person aggrieved by the superseding order, arty owner of lend abutting the lad= _ or any Persons pursuant to a upon which the proposed work is ti`WN ,djud�iestory heeaaring prrguant to G.L.G.L. ®ft�idieg they notified of their right to reques request is made by certified mail or hard delivery to the Department, with the oppropriste filing,feas a" Fee Transmittal Form as provided in 310 CMR 10.03(7), within ten days from the date of issuance of this Superseding order, and is addressed to: Docket Clerk, office of General Counsel, Department of Environsanhtat Protection, one Minter Street, Boston, MA 02108. A copy of the request shall at the gem time be sent by certified sail or hard delivery to the Conservation Commission, the applicant, and ony other party. A Rotics of Claim for an Adjudicatory Nearing shall comply with the Department's Rules for Adjudicatory Proceedings, 310 CMR 1.01(6), and shell contain the following information: (a) the DEP Wetlands File Number, name of the applicant and address of the project; (b) the complete name, address and telephone ember of the party filing the request, and, if represented by counsel, the name and address of the attorney; (c) the names and addresses of all other parties, if known; (d) a clear and concise statement of (1) the facts which are grounds the formanthe er iproceiedings,h it a(2) the ed to be objections to this Superseding order, including spa inconsistent with the Department's wetlands Regulations (310 CMR 10.00) and does not contribute to the protection of the interests identified in the Act, and (3) the relief sought through the djudicatory hearing, including specifically the changes desired in the Superseding Order; (e) a statement that a copy of the request has been sent it to tn�e applicant, the conservation commission and each other party or representative of such party., Failure to submit sit necessary information may result in a dismissal by the Department of the Notice of Claim for an Adjudicatory Nearing. Detach an dotted tiro and submit to tM P rior to commencement of work. .......................................................... Issuing Authority. To Plane be advised that the Order of Corditions for the project at ' Fite Mutber has been recorded at the Registry of - - ----has been rated in the chain ofl title of the affected property in accordance with General Condition 6 on t if recorded land, the instrument number which identifies this transaction is if registered lard, the document rmmber which identifies this'transection is Applicant Signature 5-OB I Ab BK 13078 PG 298 conservation commission Issued Sy si u e e) / This order must be signed by a majority of the conservation commission. on this ZL1j1 day of June 19 95 before me personally apps a� ' to me known to be-the - Bred the abov person.described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknawledged-A•+• $iYy act and deed. that he/she executed the same as his/her free ai rotary Public My commission expires The applicant, the owner, any person agrrieved by this Order, any owner of tend abutting the lard upon which the proposed uork is to be done, or any ten residents of the city or town in which such land is located, are hereby ratitied of their right to request the Department of Enviroremerutat Protection to issue a superseding Order, providing the request is made by eertif led mail or hard delivery to the Department, with the appropriate providing fes and Fee Transmittal Form as provided in 310 CRR 10.03(7), within ten days from the date of issuance of this determination. A Copy of the request shall at the some time be sent by certified mail or hand delivery to the Conservation Commission and the applicant. Detach on dotted line and submit to the Commission prior to commencement of work. .......................... To SALEM CONSERVATION CONIlffSSION leauirq Authority Ptease be advised that the Order of Conditions for the project at 224 and 234 HiQh�anri n..o.,+�A and File Number 64-231 has been recorded at the Registry of Essex has been rated in the chain of title of the effected property in accordance with General Condition 8 on 19 If recorded Lard. the inet runent number which identifies this trarmact ian is If registered lard, the document number which identifies this transaction is Applicant Signature 5-4A ILL��oN coyti� B1 t 13078 PLJ 300 CimseM7 afimComrmmm 'Fy`U D5W Salem. Massachusetts 01970 yASSn�a SPECIAL CONDITIONS 224-234 HIGHLAND AVENUE #64-231 1. All work shall conform to the above-referenced Notice of Intent, site plan and supporting documents and those final specifications which shall be filed with the Commission prior to construction. Any change made or intended to be made to the approved plans shall require the applicant to inquire of the Commission in writing whether the change is substantial enough to require the filing of a new Notice Of Intent. 2. Members and agents of the Commission shall have the right to enter and inspect the premises at all reasonable times to evaluate compliance with the conditions in this Order. The Commission may require the applicant to submit additional data or information necessary for the Commission to conduct that evaluation. 3. Upon completion of the project, the applicant shall submit, with the request for a Certification of Compliance, an affidavit, prepared by a professional engineer or land surveyor registered in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, stating that the site has been developed in accordance with the requirements of this Order of Conditions, the referenced site plan and supporting documents. 4. This Order shall apply to every successor in control or successor in interest of the property described in the Notice of Intent and accompanying plans or part thereof. In the event this land or any part thereof changes ownership before or during construction, the current owner shall notify the new owner, by registered mail, of this Order prior to the transfer of ownership and shalPforward proof of this notification to the Commission. 5. Prior to commencement of construction activity, a haybale barrier shall be placed downgradient of construction to prevent siltation of the adjacent wetland. Haybales shall be anchored with stakes and entrenched 4 to 6 inches in depth. Trench material shall be deposited on the upgradient side of the haybale barrier. Haybales shall be inspected daily; those showing signs of deterioration shall be replaced immediately. The haybale barrier shall remain in proper functioning condition until all disturbed areas have been stabilized. j { BK 13078 Pay 301 6. All catch basins and pipes shall be fitted with oil and gas traps. A regular cleaning and structural maintenance schedule for catch basins, manholes, and pipes shall be developed and submitted for Conservation Commission approval. 7. * A letter confirming the implementation of the cleaning and maintenance schedule shall be filed with this Commission on December 15, annually. 8. Any proposed headwalls with pipes shall be fitted with a protective barrier, approved by the Commission, sufficient to assure the free flow of water. 9. * No spill or discharge of petroleum products or other pollutants will occur within 100 feet of any wetland resource area. 10. * Use or storage of rock salt (sodium chloride) or other toxic de-icing chemicals is prohibited within 100 feet of the resource area. Any arrangement for snow removal shall stipulate the ban. 11. Notice shall be given to this Commission no more than 2 weeks nor less than 2 days prior to the commencement of construction activities. Said notice shall include, in writing, the name(s), address(es), and business and home telephone numbers of the project supervisor(s) responsible for insuring that operations are conducted in compliance with this Order. 12. * Minimal pruning and no removal of any buffer zone or wetland vegetation will occur downgradient of the staked haybale line. * ongoing conditions that do not expire upon completion of the project or issuance of a Certificate of Compliance. jm/hd/spmm64.231 r KENNEDY DEVELOPMENT GROUP,INC. 500 Broadway Everett, Massachusetts 02149 Bus. (617)387-1700 Fax (617) 387-2152 Salem Conservation Commission One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 06/29/95 RE: 224-234 Highland Ave., Salem,MA Commencement of clearing activities at site under Drainage Alteration Permit#29, issued 6/26/95 Dear Commission, Kennedy Development Group will begin work under the above referenced Permit at the Highland Ave. site on or about July 5th, 1995. All work will be performed in accordance with plans as submitted and approved to the Salem Conservation Commission and as addressed under the Boards Order of Conditions,DEP file#64-231. In addition,the dust control and debris handling measures as disclosed to the Salem Board of Health, will be adhered to. (Copy enclosed) Sincer ly .° as G. Kennedy �� President 101 19CDW CONSULTANTS, INC. CIVIL 8 ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS June 27, 1995 Salem Board of Health 9 North Street Salem, MA 01970 RE: Proposed Pep Boys 234 Highland Avenue Dust Control and Debris Management Plans Dear Members of the Board: CDW Consultants, Inc., (CDW) herein submits, on behalf of the Kennedy Development Group (KDG), plans for dust control and debris management for the proposed development of the Pep Boys facility at 234 Highland Avenue. These plans are to be implemented by KDG and their contractors. Dust Control Plan Earth work specifications for the project include two sections which address dust control, Section 01562 - Dust Control and Section 02270 - Erosion and Sediment Control. Both Sections are attached to this submittal. The Dust Control section specifies dust control using water, either from a piped source or minimum 1000 gallon mobile unit. Application shall be uniform using a nozzle or distributors. The Erosion and Sedimentation Control Section requires a stabilized construction entrance at all points of ingress or egress. It consists of 8 inches of crushed stone at least 50 feet in length, which trucks will run over to dislodge soils. It is stated that wheel washing may be needed. It also states that all soil s tracked onto public ways be removed. This would be facilitated with street sweeper. Debris Management Wastes generated during demolition and construction activities are regulated. Wood wastes from land clearing are proposed to be chipped and shipped to a wood fired power generating facility. Demolition debris will likely be segregated for off-site disposal of wood and metals, with on-site reuse of masonry material as fill material, per Massachusetts DEP guidelines. 111 Speen Street Suite 119, Framingham, MA 01701 (508)875-2657 FAX (508)875-6617 0 Proposed Pep Boys Dust Control and Debris Management The project specifications require the use of water for dust control during demolition activities. The building is being professionally inspected for the presence of asbestos, and any required removals and/or notifications will noted. Please call with any questions. Very truly yours, IOiN^SSULT S, INC. Ir/ Walker, P.E.l DUST CONTROL SECTION 01562 Division 1, General Requirements, are hereby made a part of this section as fully as if.repeated herein. 1. GENERAL 1.1. SCOPE A. This work shall consist of furnishing and applying approved dust control material to the surface of the subgrade, exposed areas, or elsewhere as directed by the Engineer. 2. PRODUCTS 2.1. MATERIALS B. Water 3 EXECUTION 3.1. GENERAL A. The required material shall be properly applied where directed by the Engineer and distributed uniformly at the rate specified. The means of distribution shall depend on the type of material used. The method and equipment used shall be satisfactory to theEngineer. B. The number and frequency of applications shall be as determined by the Engineer. 3.2. APPLICATION A. Treatment with Water 1. Water shall be applied under the control of the Engineer and shall be applied in the amounts and at locations designated by the Engineer 2. All equipment used for the application of water shall be equipped with a positive means of shut-off. PROJECT NO. 00398.00 DUST CONTROL CDW CONSULTANTS, INC. SECTION 01562 - 1 3. At least one mobile unit with aininimum capacity of 1,000 gallons shall be available for applying water on the project, unless otherwise permitted by the Engineer, or all the water is applied by means of pipe lines. 4. Water shall be applied by means of pressure-type distributors or pipe lines equipped with a spray system or hoses with nozzles that will insure a uniform application of water. ++ END OF SECTION 01562 ++ PROJECT NO. 00398.00 DUST CONTROL CDW CONSULTANTS, INC. SECTION 01562 - 2 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SECTION 02270 Division 1, General Requirements, are hereby made a part of this section as fully as if repeated herein. 1. GENERAL 1.1 SCOPE A. Receipt, unloading, handling, proper storage and protection from damage of all materials. B. Layout and coordination of work with other trades. C. Work included: Furnish all labor, equipment and materials needed to complete the work as shown on the drawings and specified herein. 1.2 RELATED WORK SPECIFIED ELSEWHERE A. Site Earthwork and Grading 02210 1.3 QUALITY ASSURANCE A. Comply with applicable requirements of governing authorities having jurisdiction. The specifications and drawings are not represented as being comprehensive, but rather convey the intent to provide complete slope protection and erosion control for both the Owner's and adjacent property. B. Erosion control measures shall be established at the beginning of construction and maintained during the entire period of construction. On-site areas which are subject to severe erosion, and off-site areas which are especially vulnerable to damage from erosion and/or sedimentation, are to be identified and receive special attention. C. All land-disturbing activities are to be planned and conducted to minimize the size of the area to be exposed at any one time, and the length of time of exposure. D. Surface water runoff originating upgrade of exposed areas should be controlled to reduce erosion and sediment loss during the period of PROJECT NO. 00398.00 . EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL CDW CONSULTANTS, INC. SECTION 02270 - 1 exposure. E. When the increase in the peak rates and velocity of storm water runoff resulting from a land-disturbing activity is sufficient to cause accelerated erosion of the receiving stream bed, provide measures to control both the velocity and rate of release so as to minimize accelerated erosion and increased sedimentation of the stream. F. All land-disturbing activities are to be planned and conducted so as to minimize off-site sedimentation damage. G. The contractor is responsible for cleaning out and disposing of all sediment once the storage capacity of the sediment facility is reduced by one-half. H. Frequent inspections are required. Repair or replacement shall be made promptly as needed. 2. PRODUCTS 2.1 MATERIALS A. Hay bales: Bales shall be either wire bound or string tied with bindings orientated around sides rather than over and under. B. Crushed stone for stabilized construction entrance shall conform to ASTM Designation C-33, size No. 2 (2-1/2" to 1-1/2"). C. Silt fence shall be assembled using Mirafi 100X filter fabric or its approved equal with galvanized wire mesh fence or industrial netting. Wood or metal fence post shall be spaced at 8'-0" on center. D. Temporary vegetative cover for graded areas shall be undamaged, air dry threshed straw free of undesirable weed seed. 3. EXECUTION 3.1 HAY BALE BARRIERS A. Excavation shall be to the width of the bale and the length of the proposed barrier to a minimum depth of 4 inches. B. Bales shall be placed in a single row, lengthwise on proposed line, with PROJECT NO. 00398.00 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL CDW CONSULTANTS, INC. SECTION 02270 - 2 ends of adjacent bales tightly abutting one another. In swales and ditches the barrier shall extend to such a length that the bottoms of the end bales are higher in elevation than the top of the lowest middle bale. C. Staking shall be accomplished to securely anchor bales by driving at least two stakes or rebars through each bale to a minimum depth of 12 inches. D. The gaps between bales shall be filled by wedging straw in the gaps to prevent water from escaping between the bales. E. The excavated soil shall be backfilled against the barrier. Backfill shall conform to ground level on the downhill side and shall be built up to 4 inches on the uphill side. Loose straw shall then be scattered over the area immediately uphill from a straw barrier. 3.2 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE A. Stone size: Use ASTM designation C-33, size No. 2 (1-1/2" to 2-1/2"). Use crushed stone. B. Length: As effective, but not less than 50 feet. C. Thickness: Not less than eight (8) inches. D. Width: Not less than full width of all points on ingress or egress, but not less than 25 feet. E. Washing: When necessary, wheels shall be cleaned to remove sediment prior to entrance onto public right-of-way. When washing is required, it shall be done on an area stabilized with crushed stone which drains into an approved sediment trap or sediment basin. All sediment shall be prevented from entering any storm drain, ditch, or watercourse through the use of sand bags, gravel boards or other approved methods. F. Maintenance: The entrance shall be maintained in a condition which will prevent tracking or flowing of sediment onto public rights-of-way. This may require periodic top dressing with additional stone as conditions demand and repair and/or cleanout of any measures used to trap sediment. All sediment spoiled, dropped, washed or tracked onto public rights-of-way must be removed immediately. 3.3 SILT FENCING PROJECT NO. 00398.00 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL CDW CONSULTANTS, INC. SECTION 02270 - 3 i A. Excavate a 6 inch by 6 inch trench along the upstream side of the desired fence location. B. Drive fence posts a minimum of 1'-6" into the ground. C. Lay lower 12" of silt fence into the trench, 6" deep and 6" wide. Backfill trench and compact. D. Overlap joints in fabric at post to prevent leakage of silt at seam. 3.4 INLET PROTECTION A. Install silt fence or hay bales around inlet as specified herein. 3.5 DUST CONTROL A. Dust generated from the Contractor's performance of the work, either inside or outside the right-of-way shall be controlled by the Contractor by applying water. B. Water shall be provided in the amounts and locations as ordered by the Engineer. + + END OF SECTION 02270 + + PROJECT NO. 00398.00 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL CDW CONSULTANTS, INC. SECTION 02270 - 4 CDW CONSULTANTS, INC. dCE4419G3 OCA M ° [Y]IM44L°ad Civil & Environmental Engineers 111 Speen Street Suite 119 FRAMINGHAM, MASSACHUSETTS 01701 DATE 5/25/95 'DR NO. 398 . 00 (508) 875-2657 A1TENT1ON Beth Debski FAX (508) 875-6617 TO RE: Salem Conservation Commission One Salem Green Pep Boys— Highland Ave. Salem, MA 01970 Updated Documents WE ARE SENDING YOU 19 Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 2 5/25/95 Updated Calculations— Proposed Conditions 2 5/23/95 Updated Site Plans THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: a For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval [X For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS - COPY TO Kennedy Development RECYCLED PAPER' Contents:d0%Pre-Consumer•10%Post-Consumer SIGNED: If enclosures are not as noted,kindly notify us at once. l CDW CONSULTANTS, INC. CIVIL&ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS © RECEIVED APR U 4 lyy5 March 31, 1995 Ms. Elizabeth Debski Salem Conservation Commission One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 RE: Notice of Intent Filing Assessors Map 8, Lots 120 and 123 Dear Ms. Debski: CDW Consultants, Inc., (CDW), on behalf of the Kennedy Development Group, Inc., is submitting the enclosed Notice of Intent for proposed activities within the buffer zone of Bordering Vegetated Wetlands. The activities are proposed for the development of a site at 224& 234 Highland Avenue, also known as Assessors Map 8, Lots 120 and 123. The local filing fee and advertising fee are enclosed. The filing fee was established to be $525.00 from Category 3, for construction of a commercial building in a buffer zone,with associated activities not subject to additional fees. Therefore, the local share of the fee is$275.00; $250.00 has been forwarded to the northeast region of the DEP with their two copies of this submittal. The advertising fee of$55.80, on the enclosed check payable to the Salem Evening News, is understood to be the cost of the legal notice in the local newspaper. This filing is also intended to serve as the filing under the City of Salem Ordinance Pertaining to General Wetlands. The original Notice of Intent along with eight copies of the entire package are provided as requested. Please call with any questions. Your assistance is appreciated. Very truly yoursiS, CD CUINC. r. John Walker, P.E. .P 'ncipal 111 Speen Street, Suite 119, Framingham, MA 01701 (508)875-2657 FAX (508)875-6617 10.99: continued DIT 15k No. (1'o be provided by DIT) Form 3 cgyfl,a, Salem Applicxni Kennedy Development Group Commonwealth Department of Defense of ssachusetts Ma united states Notice of Intent of America Under the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act, G.L. C. 131, 540 and Application for a Department of the Army Permit Part I:. General Information 1. Location: street Address 224 & 234 Highland Avenue Lot Number Lots 120 & 123 (Map 8) 2. project: TypeCommarri al Description Site preparation associated _ with the construction of two commercial buildings . No activity is proposed in resource areas. Filling, grading, paving, and drainage improvements proposed for buffer zone areas . Building corner in buffer. 3. Registry: County Essex current Book Lot 12 0: 11555 t page 457 Lot 123 : 04270 008 certificate (if Registered Land) 4. Applicant Kenne " Development Group, Inc. Tel. ( 617) 387-1700 Address 500 Broadway, Everett, MA 02149 Joseph A. Pinocchio Tel. ( 508) 887-9598 S. property owner p Address 2 Perkins Row, Topsfield, MA 01983 John Walker, P.E. CDW Consultants,TeInc. ( 508) 875-2657 6. Representative Address 111 Speen St . , Suite 119 , Framingham, MA 01701 7. a. Have the Conservation commission and the Department's Regional office each been sent, by certified mail or hand deliver, 2 copies of completed Notice of intent, with supporting plans and documents? Yes ® No ❑ b. Has the fee been submitted? Yes ® No ❑ e. Total Filing Fee Submitted $525 $275 State share of Filing Fee $250 d. City/Town Share of Filing Fee (N of tee in excess of $25, sen: to DEP) (SMI 00 city/Town) e. Is a brief statement attached indicating how the applicant calculated the fee? ❑' Yes ❑ No 10.99: continued 8. Have all obtainable permits, variances and approvals required by local by-law been obtained? Yes ❑ NO IM Obtained Applied For: Not Applied For: Zoning variances Site Plan Review Building Permits 9. Is any portion of the site subject to a wetlands �•estrict1on -Order pursuant to G.L. C. 131, S40A or G.L. c. 130, S105? Yes U No lel 10. List all plans and supporting documents submitted with this Notice of Intent. Identifying Title Date Number/Letter A Narrative B USGS Locus Map �L-01 • Exist. Cond. , L-02 Grading & Util . C Site P1an1L-02A Erosion Control , -L-03 Layout & Mater. D Construction Details L-04 Typical Detail E Drainage Calculations 11. Check those resource areas within which work is proposed: - (a) ® Buffer Zone (b) Inland: ❑ Bank- Land Subject to Flooding ❑ Bordering vegetated wetland ❑ Bordering ❑ Land Under water Body d waterway ❑ Isolated - (c) Coastal: ❑ Land Under the ocean- ❑ Designated Port Area• ❑ coastal Beach ❑ coastal Dune ❑ Barrier Beach- ❑ Coastal Bank ❑ Rocky Intertidal Shore- ❑ Salt marsh- Land Under Salt Pond- ❑ Land containing Shellfish* ❑ Fish Run- -Likely to involve U.B. Army corps of Engineers concurrent jurisdiction. See General Instructions for completing Notice of Intent. 10.99: continued 12. is the project within estimated habitat which is indicated on the most recent Estimated Habitat map of State-Listed Rare wetlands wildlife (if any) published by the Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program?? YES [ ] NO [ X ] Date printed on the,Estimzt¢¢ Heabtgat At13S NO MAP AVAILABLE [ ) (if any) 1993 Edition l in 1 44 If yes, have you sent a copy of the Notice of Intent to the Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program via the O.S. Postal service by certified or priority mail (or otherwise sent it in a manner that guarantees delivery within two days) no later than the date of the filing of this Notice of _ intent with the conservation commission and the DEP regional office? YES ( ] NO [ ] If yes please attach evidence of timely mailing or other delivery to the Natural Heritage and Endangered species Program. Part II: Site Description Indicate which of the following information has been provided (on a plan, in narrative description or calculations) to clearly, completely and accurately describe existing site conditions. Identifying Number/Letter (of plan, narrative or calculations) Natural Features A soils A Vegetation A,B,C Topography N/A open water bodies(including ponds and lakes) N/A Flowing water bodies(including streams and rivers) N/A Public and private surface. water and ground water supplies on or within 100 feet of site A maximum annual ground water elevations with dates and location of test C Boundaries of resource areas checked under Part 1, item 11 above other Han-made Features: A,C structures (such as buildings, piers, towers and A, C headwalls) Drainage and flood control facilities at the site and immediately off the site, including culverts and open A, C channels (with inverts) , dams and dikes subsurface sewage disposal systems A,C underground utilities 10.99: continued A,B, C Roadways and parking areas C Property boundaries, easements and rights-of-way other Part III: work Description Indicate which of the following information has been provided (on a plan, in narrative description or calculations) to clearly, completely and accurately describe work proposed within each of the resource areas checked in Part I, item 11 above. Identifying Number/Letter (of plan, narrative or calculations) ptanview and Cross section of: A, C structures(such as buildings, piers, towers and headwalls) A, C,D, E Drainage and flood control facilities, including culverts and open channels(with inverts) , dams and dikes A, C,D, E subsurface sewage disposal systems s underground utilities A, C Filling, dredging and excavating, indicating volume and composition of material N/A Compensatory storage areas, where required in accordance with Part III, Section 10.57(4) of the regulations. N/A wildlife habitat restoration or replication areas other Point source Discharce A,C, E Description of characteristics of discharge from point source (both closed and open channel) , when point of discharge falls within resource area checked under Part I, item 11 above, as supported by standard engineering calculations, data and plans, including but not limited to the following: 1. Delineation of the drainage area contributing to the point of discharge; 2. Pre-and post-development peak run-off from the drainage area, at the point of discharge, for at least the 10-year and 100-year frequency storm; 3. Pre- and post-derelopment rate of infiltration contributing to the resource area checked under Part 1, item 11 above; G. Estimated "ter quality characteristics of Pre- and post-development run-off at the point of discharge. 10.99: continued Part IV: Mitigating Measures 1. Clearly, cospletely and accurately describe, with reference to supporting plans and calculations Were necessary: ' (a) All Measures and designs proposed to meet the performance standards set forth under each resource area specified in Part 11 or Part III of the regulations; or (0) why the presumptions set forth under each resource area specified in Part II or Part III of the regulations do not apply. ❑ coastal Resource Area Type: Identifying number or ❑ Inland letter of support N/A documents ❑ Coastal Resource Area Type: Identifying number or ❑ Inland letter of support N/A documents 10.99: continued ❑ coastal Resource Area 'Type: Identifying number or ❑ Inland letter of support N/A documents 2. Clearly, completely and accurately describe, with reference to supporting plans and calculations where necessary: (a) sit measures and designs to regulate work within the Buffer Zone so as to ensure that said work does not alter an area specified in Part 1, Section 10.02(1)(&) of these regulations; or (b) if work in the Buffer Zone will alter such an area, all measures and designs proposed to meet the perfoinn nce standards established for the adjacent resource area, specified in Part It or Part III of these regulations. ❑ Coastal Resource Area Type Bordered Identifying number or ® Inland By 100-Feet Discretionary Zone: letter of support Bordering versetated method . documents Earthwork within the 100ft. buffer zone A,C,D,E will not begin until erosion and sedimentation control measures are implemented. These include hay bales and silt fence to both define the limit of work and control potential impacts of silty stormwater. Early in the project existing stormwater point discharges to the property will be piped across the property to minimize erosion of disturbed areas. I 10.99: continued Part v: Additional Information for a Department of the Army Permit 1. COE Application No. Not Applicable v' b (to be provided y COE) 2. (Name of waterway) 3. Names and addressee of property owners adjoining your property: 4. Document other project alternatives (i.e., other locations and/or construction methods, particularly those that would eliminate the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters or wetlands) . 5. 8y' x 11" drawings in planview and cross-section, showing the resource area and the proposed activity within the resource area. Drawings must be to scale and should be clear enough for photocopying. Certification is required from the Division of water Pollution ccntrol before the Federal permit can be issued. certification may be obtained by contacting the Division of water Pollution Control, 1 winter Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02108. where the activity will take place within the area under the Massachusetts approved Coastal Zone Management Program, the applicant certifies that his proposed activity.complies with and will be conducted in a manner that is consistent with the approved program. information provided will be used in evaluating the application for a permit and is made a matter of public record through issuance of a public notice. Disclosure of this information is voluntary; however, if necessary information is not provided, the application cannot be processed nor can a permit be issued. I hereby certify under the pains and penalties of perjury that the foregoing Notice of Intent and accompanying plans, cuments and supporting data are true and complete, to the Vaga of my k edge. � 75:L f Si n ture of Ap a Datsf Si nature of Applicant's Representative Da FORM "Exception to ENG Form 6345 approved by NOUSACE, 6 May 1982" MED 100 (TEST) 1 Inky b2 "This docuaent contains a joint Department of the Army and State of Massachusetts application for a permit to obtain permission to perform activities in United States Maters. The Office of Management and Budget(OMB) has approved those questions required by the US Army Corps of Engineers. OMB Nr r 0702-0036 and expiration date of 30 Septeaoer 1993 applies". This statement Mill be set in 6 point type. f EXHIBIT A NARRATIVE to support NOTICE OF INTENT for 224 & 234 HIGHLAND AVENUE SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS The Applicant proposes to construct two commercial buildings on adjoining parcels fronting on the north side of Highland Avenue. The southwesterly parcel (Assessors Map 8, Lot 120) has received a negative Determination of Applicability within the last two years. The northeasterly parcel (Assessors Map 8, Lot 123) is presently the Salem Sign Company, and activities on portions of this site require a Notice of Intent filing. Significant portions of the parcels were historically filled, and are mapped by the Soil Conservation Service as urban fill. The northern extent of the parcels have notable ledge outcroppings. The northern extent of the parcels are vegetated with a variety of hardwoods, the filled areas have less established vegetation. Wetlands vegetation sufficient for regulatory definition as a resource area were identified off site to the northeast, behind the Sunburst Fruit Juice facility, and were delineated with numbered flags. The resulting 100 foot buffer zone extends onto the areas of the site proposed to be graded as part of the development plan, and intercepts a comer of a proposed building. The existing topography on site consists of fill apparently placed to establish the adjacent Route 107 highway grade, and to provide for previous site improvements at the highway grade. A depression provides for stormwater runoff across the property from a highway culvert, and steep ledge slopes rise to the west and north. Proposed topography will be relatively level to provide safe access to the proposed buildings, and will be achieved by ledge excavation and placement of excavated on site soil and rock and off site fill. Groundwater depth from grade varies greatly with the topography, ranging from a few feet to about thirteen feet. No areas of significant ponding or sustained surface water flow are evident on site. A stone culvert discharges onto the site near the western end of the site from under Route 107, a smaller 12" storm drain pipe discharges from Route 107 at the east end of the site. These point discharges will be piped to the northeast corner of the site, where the flows presently leave the site The stormwater management calculations present the analyses of runoff conditions before and after the proposed development. The details of the system design include consideration of stormwater runoff quality. Pipe sizes and slopes, and outfall structures, are selected to control the velocity of discharges to prevent erosion. Catch basins are proposed with sediment sumps and oil traps. The present subsurface sewage disposal system will be replaced with a public sewerage connection. P, ^� ♦ g 5 � Bim. r y �vla r nq' \ / - FF� B �. 12 ♦'•• �: u?° ' '✓' �_ r 1�-'< .PotmP'P�L \f, yOjr _ l��_�,..� :,_;•� r awl�% �„ ■ :%,' l Ptlin F '`-. A- �//— /fir � gad\T� rS s S - � r♦ � � PI raund�3f N-- LL- 2 J - �� m sr• _ r � o p. \ 'rwicn - a a ] tFp9 9{�Olnl -h t TAGS a -'I O `Parke 01 6 x / '\ ^,Eertr' nal Bn�R $\R / Ce = � � �' Golf Course e �� PPrn9 n _ '.'~ . H -i• �� _ / Ste.P.ot PIaYg,e 7 y S _ iii �f/ ` ' � �f -- 1♦ Boat '+ ' _ ' �♦ •I - � Fen X PEters rn Paek�AamPj�r/�� j \ A.V Famarvo O re Wor � Hi9 r . I c� � � __ �f0 ./ ♦ — ♦L a e _ � _— � r _'- iu 107/ h 6 gP � i �s�H. /` �i "• :�� \� � L � _ �, - yMt Salem ', ra: - _ � f �,�� "-✓ t• /r �'/\ - ._\� Park �� ,!i l�a - ' Commo • deham� o p_ o"" Cem',• TS f 9,,� I 'y� \::1 / .\ �� ire� �1'e� •�; /�/��\`. �" / _ , t+•. \ "rT `, O ..•I NaFBOR ST'r •Sre 11 sr \ ire ��9t\p�lt`d �� 4 0�,`. /•�I .6 t Nit 7-V 7 aa� E Pend r r {V LL C,, ��• � .J li� � V I�" �E�s _ C 'L O` ' .\ /• 1 \ \ .� p• OCE N .IYE �Io vv�• S �1 Plav round � r � S II// l / • I.. � •� s Npeafto � / eYl/ . .�� .��' �\ C��/ EXHIBIT nBn USGS LOCUS MAP 1 G p 224 234 Highland Avenue olftialc u[ Salem, MA Salem Quad 1985 f KENNEDY DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC. 500 Broadway Everett, Masrachasefts 02149 Bur. (617) 387.1700 Paz (617) 387-21S2 March 30, 1995 Mr . John Walker CDW Consultants, Inc. 111 Speen street, suite 119 Framingham, MA 01701 Hi hland Av nue alem Dear Mr. Walker: I hereby authorize you to sign, on my behalf, the Notice of Intent for the Salem Conservation Commission and/or any related documents that are required. Ve my yours Thomas G. Kennedy President TGK: jmm y . • a Hydrologic Analysis For Proposed Pep Boys Salem, MA Prepared By: CDW CONSULTANTS, INC. 111 Speen Street, Suite 119 Framingham, MA 01701 March 31, 1995 Revised May 25, 1995 ,A OF 6} F JOHN o M. .l W No ISTEP G��4. SSIONAL EN PROPOSED CONDITIONS 2 YEAR STORM Data for Pep Boys - Post Development Prepared by CDW Consultants, Inc. 15 May 95 HydroCAD 3.02 000536 (c) 1986-1992 Applied Microcomputer Systems ,WATERSHED ROUTING 1 1 ( )SUBCATCHMENT F-] REACH POND LINK SUBCATCHMENT 1 -> POND 1 X,Y = 4.---4 4.4 <1 1> POND 1 -> X,Y = 4.4 2.5 <1 2> ' Data for Pep Boys - Poet Development Prepared by CDW Consultants, Inc. 15 May 95 HydroCAD 3.02 000536 (c) 1986-1992 Applied Microcomputer systems RUNOFF BY SCS TR-20 METHOD: TYPE III 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 3.2 IN, SCS U.H. SUBCAT AREA Tc WGT'D PEAK Tpeak VOL NUMBER (ACRE) (MIN) --GROUND COVERS (tCN) -- CN C (CFS) (HRS) (AF) 1 3.40 2.8 84198 16170 - - 93 - 9.6 12.00 .61 Data for Pep Boys - Post Development _ Prepared by CDW Consultants, Inc. 15 May 95 HydrOCAD 3. 02 000536 (c) 1986-1992 Applied Microcomputer Systems POND ROUTING BY STOR-IND METHOD POND OUTLET START FLOOD PEAK PEAK ---PEAK FLOW--- NO. DEVICES ELEV. ELEV. ELEV. STORAGE Qin Qout ATTEN. LAG (FT) (FT) (FT) (AF) (CFS) (CFS) (o) (MIN) 1 2 81.0 85.0 82.8 .23 9.6 2.4 75 21.7 Data for Pep Boys - Post Development Prepared by CDW Consultants, Inc. 15 May 95 HydroCAD 3.02 000536 (c) 1986-1992 Applied Microcomputer Systems SUBCATCHNENT 1 Pep Boys - Post Development ACRES CN 2.84 98 Pavement & Buildings SCS TR-20 METHOD .56 70 Graded Soil TYPE. III 24-HOUR 3.40 93 RAINFALL= 3.2 IN PEAK= 9.6 CFS ® 12.00 HRS VOLUME= .61 AF Method Comment Tc (min) TR-55 SHEET. FLOW - Section 1 .6 Grass: Short n=.15 L=20' P2=3.2 in s=1 TR-55 SHEET FLOW Section 2 .4 Smooth surfaces n=.011 L=30' P2=3 .2 in s=.0333 SHALLOW CONCENTRATED/UPLAND FLOW Section 3 1.7 Paved KV=20.3282 L=480' s=.054 '/' V=4.72 fps SHALLOW CONCENTRATED/UPLAND FLOW Section 4 - .1 Unpaved KV=16.1345 L=50' s=.36 '/' V=9.68 fps Total Length= 580 ft Total To= 2.8 SUBCATCHMENT 1 RUNOFF Pep Boys - Post Development g9 . e5 8 . 5 AREA= 3 . 4 AC 7 : 5 Tc= 2 . 8 MIN 7 . 8 CN= 93 r, 6 . 5 5 . 5 SCS TR-23 METHOD U 54 : 5 TYPE III 24-HOUR 3 4 . 0 RAINFALL= 3 . 2 IN o 3 . 5 - -1 3 . 0 - PEAK= 9 . 6 CFS 2 . 8 @ 12 HRS 1 5 UOLUME= . 61 AF . 5 0 . e0 N M IT Ln �.D r� MCT) m TIME (hours ) Data for Pep Boys - Post Development Prepared by CDW Consultants, Inc. 15 May 95 HydroCAD 3.02 000536 (c) 1986-1992 Applied Microcomputer systems SUBCATCHNENT 1 Pep Boys - Post Development RUNOFF PEAK= 9.6 CFS @ 12.00 HOURS HOUR 0.00 .10 .20 .30 .40 .50 .60 .70 80 90 10.00 .3 .4 .4 .4 .4 .4 .5 .5 .5 .5 11.00 ( .6 .7 .7 .8 .9 1.1 1.8 2.7 3.5 5.6 12.00 9.6 5.4 3.8 2.9 2.0 1.3 1.1 1.0 .9 .8 13 .00 .8 .7 .7 .7 .7 .6 .6 .6 .6 .5 14.00 .5 .5 .5 .5 .5 - .4 .4 .4 .4 .4 15.00 .4 .4 .4 .4 .3 .3 .3 .3 .3 .3 16.00 .3 .3 .3 .3 .3 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 17.00 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 18.00 .2 ..2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 19.00 .2 .2 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 20.00 .1 Data for Pep Boys - Post Development Prepared by CDW Consultants, Inc. 15 May 95 HydroCAD 3 .02 000536 (c) 1986-1992 Applied Microcomputer Systems POND 1 Subsurface Detention STARTING ELEV= 81.0 FT FLOOD ELEV= 85.0 FT ELEVATION INC.STOR CUM.STOR STOR-IND METHOD (FT) (CF) (CF) PEAK ELEVATION= 82.8 FT 81.0 0 0 PEAK STORAGE = 10191 CF 82 .0 4428 4428 Qin = 9.6 CFS @ 12.00 HRS 83.0 6876 11304 Qout= 2.4 CFS @ 12.36 HRS 84.0 6894 18198- ATTEN= 75 t LAG= 21.7 MIN 85.0 4438 22636 IN/OUT= .61 / .59 AF INVERT (FT) OUTLET DEVICES 81.0 8" CULVERT n=.011 L=50' S=.02' /' Ke=.5 Cc=.9 Cd=.6 . 82.5 8" CULVERT n=.011 L=50' S=.05' /' Ke=.5 Cc=.9 Cd=.6 TOTAL DISCHARGE vs ELEVATION - FEET 0.0 .1 .2 .3 .4 .5 .6 .7 .8 .9 81.0 0.0 0.0 .1 .3 .5 .7 .9 1.0 1.1 1.3 82.0 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.1 2.3 2.6 83.0 2.8 3.1 3.3 3 .5 3.7 3.8 4.0 4.1 4.3 4.4 841.0 4.6 4.7 4.8 4.9 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 85.0 5.6 Data for Pep Boys - Post Development Prepared by COW Consultants, Inc. 15 May 95 HydroCAO 3 .02 000536 (c) 1986-1992 Applied Microcomputer Systems POND 1 DISCHARGE Subsurface Detention - -f-1 00-d etention - -flood eIev . - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - 84 . 5 84 . 0 83 . 5 a 83 . 0 8" CULVERT Q 82 . 5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 82 . 0 w 81 . 5 8" CULUERT 81 . 8m Ln m Ln m Ln m �n m Ln m M 7' 1;T n LO DISCHARGE ( cfs) Data for Pep Boys = Post Development Prepared by CDW Consultants, Inc. 15 May 95 HydroCAD 3 .02 000536 (c) 1986-1992 Applied Microcomputer Systems POND 1 INFLOW & OUTFLOW Sub5urfoce Detention 9 . 5 9 . 0 8 .0 STOR- IND METHOD 5 PEAK ELEU= 82 . 6 FT 7 .7 . 8 PEAK STOR= 10191 CF r, 66 . 5 to 5 . 5 Qin= 9 . 6 CFS 5 . g Qout= 2 . 4 CFS 3 4 . 0 LAG= 21 . 7 MIN 0 3 . 5 3 . 0 LL 1 . 0 5 TIME Chour57 POND 1 Subsurface Detention OUTFLOW PEAK= 2.4 CES 0 12.36 HOURS HOUR 0.00 .10 .20 .30 .40 .50 .60 .70 .80 .90 10.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .1 .1 .1 .2 .2 .2 11.00 .3 .3 .4 .4 .5 .6 .7 .9 1.1 1.4 12.00 1.7 2.0 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.0 1.9 13 .00 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.4 14.00 I 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.0 .9 .9 .8 15.00 .7 .7 .6 .6 .6 .5 .5 .5 .4 .4 16.00 I .4 .4 .4 .3 .3 .3 .3 .3 .3 .3 17.00 .3 .3 .3 .3 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 18.00 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 19.00 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 20.00 .2 PROPOSED CONDITIONS 10 YEAR STORM Data for Pep Boys - Post Development Prepared by CDW Consultants, Inc. - 15 May 95 HydroCAD 3.02 000536 (c) 1986-1992 Applied Microcomputer Systems WATERSHED ROUTING 1 1 { ) SUBCATCHMENT REACH POND � LINK SUBCATCHMENTT 1 -> POND 1 X,Y = 4.4 4.4 <1 1> POND 1 -> X,Y = 4.4 2.5 <1 2> Data for Pep Boys - Post Development Prepared by CDW Consultants, Inc. 15 May 95 HydroCAD 3 .02 000536 (c) 1986-1992 Applied Microcomputer Systems RUNOFF BY SCS TR-20 METHOD: TYPE III 24-HOUR. RAINFALL= 4.6 IN, SCS U.K. SUBCAT AREA Tc WGT'D PEAK Tpeak VOL NUMBER (ACRE) (MIN) --GROUND COVERS (%CN) -- CN C (CFS) (HRS) (AF) 1 3.40 2.8 84%98 16%70 - - 93 - 14.6 12.00 .93 Data for Pep Boys - Post Development Prepared by CDW Consultants, Inc. 15 May 95 HydroCAD 3.02 000536 (c) 1986-1992 Applied Microcomputer Systems POND ROUTING BY STOR-IND METHOD POND OUTLET START FLOOD PEAK - PEAK ---PEAK FLOW--- NO. DEVICES ELEV. ELEV. ELEV. STORAGE Qin Qout ATTEN. LAG (FT) (FT) (FT) (AF) (CFS) (CFS) (g) (MIN) 1 2 81.0 85.0 83 .6 .35 14.6 4.0 73 20.0 Data for Pep Boys - Post Development Prepared by CDW Consultants, Inc. 15 May 95 HydroCAD 3 .02 000536 (c) 1986-1992 Applied Microcomputer Systems SUBCATCHMENT 1 Pep Boys - Post Development ACRES CN 2.84 98 Pavement & Buildings SCS TR-20 METHOD .56 70 Graded Soil TYPE III 24-HOUR 3 .40 93 RAINFALL= 4.6 IN PEAK= 14.6 CFS Q 12.00 HRS VOLUME= .93 AF - Method Comment Tc (min) TR-55 SHEET FLOW Section 1 '.6 Grass: Short n=.15 L=20' P2=3.2 in s=1 TR-55 SHEET FLOW - - Section 2 .4 Smooth surfaces n=.011 L=30' P2=3.2 in s=.0333 SHALLOW CONCENTRATED/UPLAND FLOW Section 3 1.7 Paved Kv=20.3282 L=480' s=.054 ' /' V=4.72 fps SHALLOW CONCENTRATED/UPLAND FLOW Section 4 .1 Unpaved Kv=16.1345 L=50' s=.36 ' /' V=9.68 fps ---------- Total Length= 580 ft Total Tc= 2.8 SUBCATCHMENT 1 RUNOFF Pep Boys - Post Development 14 - 13 - AREA= 3 . 4 AC 12 Tc= 2 . 8 MIN 11- CN= 93 10 8 SCS TR-20 METHOD J 7 TYPE III 24-HOUR 3 6 RAINFALL= 4 . 6 IN 0 5 - 4 PEAK= 14 . 6 CFS 3 @ 12 HR5 2 VOLUME= 93 AF 1 0m N M T Ln �D r� M rn m TIME (hours ) Data for Pep Boys - Post Development Prepared by CDW Consultants, Inc. 15 May 95 HydroCAD 3.02 000536 (c) 1986-1992 Applied Microcomputer Systems SUBCATCHMENT 1 Pep Boys - Post Development RUNOFF PEAK= 14.6 CFS @ 12.00 HOURS HOUR 0.00 .10 .20 .30 .40 .50 .60 .70 .80 .90 10.00 .6 .6 .6 .7 .7 .8 .8 .8 .9 .9 11.00 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.5 1.8 2.9 4.2 5.5 8.6 12.00 14.6 8.0 5.7 4.4 3.0 1.9 1.7 1.5 1.4 1.2 13.00 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 .9 .9 _9 .8 .8 14.00 .8 .7 .7 .7 .7 .7 .6 .6 .6 .6 15.00 .6 .6 .5 .5 .5 .5 .5 .5 .4 .4 16.00 .4 .4 .4 .4 .4 .4 .4 .3 .3 .3 17.00 .3 .3 .3 .3 .3 .3 .3 .3 .3 .3 18.00 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 19.00 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 20.00 .2 Data for Pep Boys - Post Development Prepared by CDW Consultants, Inc. 15 May 95 HydroCAD 3.02 000536 (c) 1986-1992 Applied Microcomputer Systems POND 1 Subsurface Detention STARTING ELEV= 81.0 FT FLOOD ELEV= 85.0 FT ELEVATION INC.STOR CUM.STOR STOR-IND METHOD (FT) (CF) (CF) PEAK ELEVATION= 83 .6 FT 81.0 0 0 PEAK STORAGE _, 15267 CF 82.0 4428 4428 Qin = 14.6 CFS m 12.00 HRS 83 .0 6876 11304 Qout= 4.0 CFS ® 12.33 HRS 84.0 6894 18198 ATTEN= 73 a LAG= 20.0 MIN 85.0 4438 22636 IN/OUT= .93 / .90 AF INVERT (FT) OUTLET DEVICES 81.0 8" CULVERT n=.011 L=50' 5=.02'/' Ke=.S Cc=.9 Cd=.6 82.5 8" CULVERT n=.011 L=50' 5=.05'/' Ke=.S Cc=.9 Cd=.6 TOTAL DISCHARGEvs ELEVATION FEET 0.0 .1 .2 .3 .4 .5 .6 .7 .8 .9 81.0 0.0 0.0 .1 .3 .5 .7 .9 1.0 1.1 1.3 82.0 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.1 2.3 2.6 83.0 2.8 3.1 3.3 3.5 3.7 3.8 4.0 4.1 4.3 4.4 84.0 4.6 4.7 4.8 4.9 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 85.0 5.6 Data for Pep Boys - Post Development Prepared by CDW Consultants, Inc. 15 May 95 HydroCAD 3 .02 000536 (c) 1986-1992 Applied Microcomputer systems POND 1 DISCHARGE Subsurface Detention 85 . 0 flood_ elev . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 84 . 5 84 . 0 ti- 83 . 5 0 83 . 0 Q 82 . 5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - 8'' C U L V E R T J 82 . 0 w 81 . 5 8" CULVERT 81 . 8m to m Ln m LO m LD CSD - - N N M M � "T LSA ISS DISCHARGE fcf57 Data for Pep Boys - Post Development Prepared by CDW Consultants, Inc. 15 May 95 HydroCAD 3 .02 000536 (c) 1986-1992 Applied Microcomputer Systems POND 1 INFLOW & OUTFLOW Subsurface Detention 14 - 13 - STOR- IND METHOD 12 PEAK ELEU= 83 . 6 FT 11 PEAK STOR= 15267 CF ,� 10 U 8 Qin= 14 . 6 CFS 7 Qout= 4 . 0 CFS 3 6 LAG= 20 MIN 0 5 LL 4 3 - 2 - TIME (hours ) POND 1 Subsurface Detention OUTFLOW PEAK= 4.0 CFS ® 12.33 HOURS HOUR 0.00 .10 .20 .30 .40 .50 .60 .70 .80 .90 10.00 0.0 0.0 .1 .1 .2 .2 .3 .4 .4 .5 11.00 .6 .6 .7 .8 .9 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.8 12.00 2.6 3 .6 3 .9 4.0 3.9 3.8 3.7 3.5 3.3 3.1 13 .00 2.8 2.6 2 .4 2.2 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.8 14.00 ( 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.3 15.00 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.0 .9 .9 .8 .7 16.00 .7 .6 .6 .6 .5 .5 .5 .5 .5 .4 17.00 .4 .4 .4 .4 .4 .4 .3 .3 .3 .3 18.00 .3 .3 .3 .3 .3 .3 .3 .3 .3 .3 19.00 .3 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 20.00 .2 Data for Pep Boys - Post Development Prepared by CDW Consultants, Inc. 15 May 95 HydrOCAD 3.02 000536 (c) 1986-1992 Applied Microcomputer Systems CALCULATION WARNINGS SUBCATCHDZENT 1 WARNING: Tc<2dt. Reduce dt if instantaneous peak is needed. --- end of calculations --- PROPOSED CONDITIONS 25 YEAR STORM Data for Pep Boys - Post Development Prepared by CDW Consultants, Inc. 15 May 95 HydroCAD 3.02 000536 (c) 1986-1992 Applied Microcomputer Systems WATERSHED ROUTING 1 1 ( )SUBCATCHMENT F-] REACH POND LINK SDBCATCBDWXT 1 -> POND 1 X,Y = 4.4 4.4 <1 1> POND 1 -> X,Y = 4.4 2.5 <1 2> Data for Pep Boys - Post Development Prepared by COW Consultants, Inc. 15 May 95 HydroCAD 3 .02 000536 (c) 1986-1992 Applied Microcomputer Systems RUNOFF BY SCS TR-20 METHOD: TYPE III 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 5.4 IN, SCS U.K. SUBCAT AREA To WGT'D PEAK Tpeak VOL NUMBER (ACRE) (MIN) --GROUND COVERS (tCN) -- CN C (CFS) (HRS) (AF) 1 3.40 2.8 84198 1670 - - 93 - 17.4 12.00 1.11 Data for Pep,Boys - Post Development Prepared by CDW Consultants, Inc. 15 May 95 HydroCAD 3 .02 000536 (c) 1986-1992 Applied Microcomputer Systems POND ROUTING BY STOR-IND METHOD POND OUTLET START FLOOD PEAK PEAK ---PEAK FLOW--- NO. DEVICES ELEV. ELEV. ELEV. STORAGE Qin Qout ATTEN. LAG (FT) (FT) (FT) (AF) (CFS) (CFS) (%-) (MIN) 1 2 81.0 85.0 84.0 .42, 17.4 4.6 73 20.2 Data for Pep Boys - Post Development • Prepared by CDW Consultants, Inc. 15 May 95 HydroCAD 3.02 000536 (c) 1986-1992 Applied Microcomputer Systems SUBCATCHMENT 1 Pep Boys - Post Development ACRES CN 2.84 98 Pavement &-Buildings SCS TR-20 METHOD .56 70 Graded Soil TYPE III 24-HOUR 3 .40 93 - RAINFALL= 5.4 IN PEAK= 17.4 CFS Q 12.00 HRS VOLUME= 1.11 AF Method Comment Tc (min) TR-55 SHEET FLOW Section 1 .6 Grass: Short n=.15 L=20' P2=3.2 in S=1 TR-55 SHEET FLOW Section 2 .4 Smooth surfaces n=.011 L=30' P2=3.2 in s=.0333 SHALLOW CONCENTRATED/UPLAND FLOW Section 3 1.7 Paved KV=20.3282 L=480' S=.054 ' /' V=4.72 fps SHALLOW CONCENTRATED/UPLAND FLOW Section 4 .1 Unpaved KV=16.1345 L=50' s=.36 ' /' V=9.68 fps Total Length= 580 ft Total Tc= 2.8 SUBCATCHMENT 1 RUNOFF Pep Boys - Post Development 17 15 AREA= 3 . 4 AC 14 Tc= 2 . 8 MIN 13 CN= 93 12 LO`- 10 SCS TR-20 METHOD J 8 TYPE III 24-HOUR 3 7 RAINFALL= 5 . 4 IN 0 6 4 PEAK= 17 . 4 CFS 3 @ 12 HRS 2 VOLUME= 1 . 11 AF 1 eCD N M ;- Ln Qn r�- oo rn m TIME (hours ) Data for Pep Boys - Post Development Prepared by CDW Consultants, Inc. 15 May 95 HydroCAD 3.02 000536 (c) 1986-1992 AODlied Microcomputer systems SDBCATCHMENT 1 Pep Boys - Post Development RUNOFF PEAK= 17.4 CFS @ 12.00 HOURS HOUR 0.00 .10 .20 .30 .40 .50 .60 .70 .80 .90 10.00 .7 .8 .8 .8 .9 .9 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1 11.00 1.2 1.3 1.5 1.6 1.8 2.2 3 .5 5.0 6.6 '10.3 12.00 ,� 17.4 9.6 6.7 5.2 3.6 , 2.3 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.5 13.00 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.0 .9 14.00 .9 .9 .8 .8 .8 .8 .8 .7 .7 .7 15.00 .7 .7 .6 .6 .6 .6 .6 .5 .5 .5 16.00 .5 .5 .5 .4 .4 .4 .4 .4 .4 .4 17.00 ( .4 .4 - .4 .4 .3 .3 .3 .3 .3 .3 18.00 .3 .3 .3 .3 .3 .3 .3 .3 .3 .3 19.00 .3 .3 .3 .3 .3 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 20.00 .2 Data for Pep Boys - Post Development Prepared by CDW Consultants, Inc. 15 May 95 HydroCAD 3.02 000536 (c) 1986-1992 Applied Microcomputer Systems POND 1 Subsurface Detention STARTING ELEV= 81.0 FT FLOOD ELEV= 85.0 FT ELEVATION INC.STOR CUM.STOR STOR-IND METHOD (FT) (CF) (CF) _ PEAK ELEVATION= 84.0 FT 81.0 0 0 PEAK STORAGE = 18388 CF 82.0 4428 4428 Qin = 17.4 CFS @ 12.00 HRS 83.0 6876 11304 Qout= 4.6 CFS ® 12.33 HRS 84.0 6894 18198 ATTEN= 73 t LAG= 20.2 MIN 85.0 4438 22636 IN/OUT= 1.11 / 1.08 AF INVERT (FT) OUTLET DEVICES 81.0 8" CULVERT n=.011 L=50' 5=.02'/' Ke=.S Cc=.9 Cd=.6 82.5 8" CULVERT n=.011 L=50' 5=.05' /' Ke=.S Cc=.9 Cd=.6 . TOTAL DISCHARGE vs ELEVATION FEET 0.0 .1 .2 .3 .4 .5 .6 .7 .8 .9 81.0 0.0 0.0 .1 .3 .5 .7 .9 1.0 1.1 1.3 82.0 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.1 2.3 2.6 83.0 2.8 3.1 3.3 3 .5 3.7 3.8 4.0 4.1 4.3 4.4 84.0 4.6 4.7 4.8 4.9 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 85.0 I 5..6 Data for Pep Boys - Poet Development Prepared-by CDW Consultants, Inc. 15 May 95 HydroCAD 3 .02 000536 (c) 1986-1992 Applied Microcomputer Systems POND 1 DISCHARGE Subsurface Detention 85 . 0 -flood - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 84 . 5 - 84 . 3 - 83 . 5 - Z 4 . 584 . 08.3 . 5a 83 . 0 I—I 8" CULUERT Q82 . 5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 82 . 0 w 81 . 5 8" CULUERT 81 . 8m Ln m in m in m m m �n m — — N N M M Iq T LO In DISCHARGE ( cfs) Data for Pep Boys - Post Development Prepared by CDW Consultants, Inc. 15 May 95 HydroCAD 3.02 000536 (c) 1986-1992 Anolied Microcomnuter Systems POND 1 INFLOW & OUTFLOW Subsurface Detention 17 15 STOR- IND METHOD 14 PEAK ELEU= 84 FT 12 PEAK STOR= 18388 CF - 1a Qin= 17 . 4 CFS 98 Qout= 4 . 6 CFS 0 7 LAG= 20 . 2 MIN J S - 54 5 - 4 2 TIME (hours ) POND 1 Subsurface Detention OUTFLOW PEAK= 4.6 CFS @ 12.33 HOURS HOUR 0.00 .10 .20 .30 .40 .50 .60 .70 .80 .90 10.00 0.0 0.0 .1 .1 .2 .3 .4 .5 .6 .6 11.00 .7 .8 .9 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.7 2.0 12.00 3 .4 4.2 4.5 4.6 4.6 4.5 4.3 4.1 4.0 3.8 13 .00 3.6 3 .4 3.1 2.9 2.7 2.5 2.3 2.2 2.0 2.0 14.00 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.5 15.00 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.0 16.00 .9 .9 .8 .8 .7 .7 .6 .6 .6 .5 17.00 .5 .5 .5 .5 .4 .4 .4 .4 .4 .4 18.00 .4 .4 .3 .3 A .3 .3 .3 .3 .3 19.00 .-3 .3 .3 .3 .3 .3 .3 .3 - .3 .3 20.00 .3 Data for Pep Boys - Post Development Prepared by CDW Consultants, Inc. 15 May 95 HydroCAD 3.02 000536 (c) 1986-1992 Applied Microcomputer Systems CALCULATION WARNINGS SUBCATCH20NT 1 WARNING: Tc<2dt. Reduce dt if instantaneous peak is needed. POND 1 WARNING: Peaked approx. .17 ft above flood elevation --- end of calculations --- PROPOSED CONDITIONS 100 YEAR STORM Data for Pep Boys - Post Development Prepared by CDW Consultants, Inc. 15 May 95 HydroCAD 3.02 000536 (c) 1986-1992 Aoolied Microcomputer Systems WATERSHED ROUTING 1 1 OSUBCATCHMENT F] REACH Q POND LINK SUBCATCH14EM 1 -> POND 1 X,Y = 4.4 4.4 <1 1> POND 1 -> X,Y = 4.4 2.5 <1 1> Data for Pep Boys - Post Development Prepared by CDW Consultants, Inc. 15 May 95 HydroCAD 3 .02 000536 (c) 1986-1992 Applied Microcomputer Systems RUNOFF BY SCS TR-20 METHOD: TYPE III 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 6.7 IN, SCS U.H. SUBCAT AREA Tc WGT'D PEAK Tpeak VOL NUMBER (ACRE) (MIN) --GROUND COVERS (tCN) -- CN C (CFS) (HRS) (AF) 1 3.40 2.8 ,84%98 16$70 - - 93 - 21.9 12.00 1.40 Data for Pep Boys - Post Development Prepared by CDW Consultants, Inc. 15 May 95 HydroCAD 3 .02 000536 (c) 1986-1992 Applied Microcomputer Systems POND ROUTING BY STOR-IND METHOD POND OUTLET START FLOOD PEAK PEAK ---PEAK FLOW--- NO. DEVICES ELEV. ELEV. ELEV. STORAGE Qin Qout ATTEN. LAG (FT) (FT) (FT). (AF) (CFS) (CFS) (MIN) 1 2 81.0 85.0 85.2 .54 21.9 5.8 74 20.3 Data for Pep Boys - Post Development Prepared by CDW Consultants, Inc. 15 May 95 HydroCAD 3.02 000536 (c) 1986-1992 Applied Microcomputer Systems SUBCATCHMENT 1 Pep Boys - Post Development ACRES CN 2.84 98 Pavement & Buildings SCS TR-20 METHOD .56 70 Graded Soil TYPE III 24-HOUR 3 .40 93 RAINFALL= 6.7 IN PEAK= 21.9 CFS ® 12.00 HRS VOLUME= 1.40 AF Method Comment Tc (min) TR-55 SHEET FLOW Section 1 .6 Grass: Short n=.15 . L=20' P2=3.2 in s=1 TR-55 SHEET FLOW - Section 2 .4 Smooth surfaces n=.011 L=30' P2=3.2 in s=.0333 SHALLOW CONCENTRATED/UPLAND FLOW Section 3 1.7 Paved Kv=20.3282 L=480' s=.054 ' /' V=4.72 fps _ SHALLOW CONCENTRATED/UPLAND FLOW Section 4 .1 Unpaved Kv=16.1345 L=50' s=.36 ' /' V=9.68 fps Total Length= 580 ft Total To= 2.8 1 SUBCATCHMENT 1 RUNOFF Pep Boys - Post Development 22 20 AREA= 3 . 4 AC 18 Tc= 2 . 8 MIN 16 CN= 93 14 SCS TR-20 METHOD u 12 TYPE III 24-HOUR 10 RAINFALL= 6 . 7 IN a 8 I6 PEAK= 21 . 9 CFS 4 @ 12 HRS UOLUME= 1 . 40 AF 2 em N 0 r�- M M m TIME (hours ) Data for Pep Boys - Post Development Prepared by CDW Consultants, Inc. 15 May 95 HydroCAD 3 .02 000536 (c) 1986-1992 Applied Microcomputer Systems SDBCATCH'ME+NT 1 Pep Boys Post Development RUNOFF PEAK= 21.9 CFS ® 12 .00 HOURS HOUR 0.00 .10 .20 .30 .40 .50 .60 .70 .80 .90 10.00 I .9 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.4 11.00, 1.5 1.7 1.9 2.1 2.3 2.8 4.5 6.4 8.4 13.0 12.00 21.9 12.0 8.5 6.5 4.5 2.9 2.5 2.3 2.0 1.8 13.00 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.2 14.00 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 .9 .9 .9 15.00 .8 .8 .8 .8 .7 .7 .7 .7 .6 .6 . 16.00 .6 .6 .6 .6 .5 .5 .5 .5 .5 .5 17.00 .5 .5 .5 .4 .4 .4 .4 .4 .4 .4 18.00 .4 .4 .4 .4 .3 .3 .3 .3 .3 .3 19.00 .3 .3 .3 .3 .3 .3 .3 .3 .3 .3 20.00 .3 Data for Pep Boys - Post Development Prepared by CDW Consultants, Inc. 15 May 95 HydrOCAD 3.02 000536 (c) 1986-1992 Applied Microcomputer Systems POND 1 Subsurface Detention STARTING ELEV= 81.0 FT FLOOD ELEV= 85.0 FT ELEVATION INC.STOR CUM.STOR STOR-IND METHOD (FT) (CF) (CF) PEAK ELEVATION= 85.2 FT 81.0 0 0 PEAK STORAGE _ 23410 CF 82.0 4428 4428 Qin = 21.9 CFS ® 12.00 HRS 83.0 6876 11304 Qout= 5.8 CFS ® 12.34 HRS 84.0 6894 18198 ATTEN= 74 %- LAG= 20.3 MIN 85.0 4438 22636 IN/OUT= 1.40 / 1.37 AF INVERT (FT) OUTLET DEVICES 81.0 8" CULVERT n=.011 L=50' 5=.021/' Ke=.S Cc=.9 Cd=.6 82.5 8" CULVERT n=.011 L=50' 5=.05'/' Ke=.S Cc=.9 Cd=.6 TOTAL DISCHARGE vs ELEVATION FEET 0.0 .1 .2 .3 .4 .5 .6 .7 .8 .9 81.0 0.0 0.0 .1 .3 .5 .7 .9 1.0 1.1 1.3 82.0 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.1 2.3 2.6 83 .0 2.8 3.1 3.3 3.5 3 .7 3.8 4.0 4.1 4.3 4.4 84.0 4.6 4.7 4.8 4.9 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 85.0 5.6 Data for Pep Boys - Post Development Prepared by CDW Consultants, Inc. 15 May 95 HydroCAD 3 .02 000536 (c) 1986-1992 Applied Microcomputer Systems i POND 1 DISCHARGE Subsurface Detention 85 . 0 f1oodeIev - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 84 . 5 84 . 0 ti- 8.8 . 5 o 83 . 0 82 5 - - - - CULVERT L'ji 82 . 0 w 81 . 5 8" CULUERT 8 1 Om Ln m Ln m Ln m Ln m Ln m Ln CS] — — N N M M d' d- Ln Ln DISCHARGE ( cfs) Data for Pep Boys - Post Development . Prepared by CDW Consultants, Inc. 15 May 95 HydroCAD 3 .02 000536 (c) 1986-1992 Applied Microcomputer Systems POND 1 INFLOW & OUTFLOW Subsurface Detention 22 20 STOR- IND METHOD 18 PEAK ELEU= 85 . 2 FT 16 PEAK STOR= 2.341.0 CF LO 14 - - 12 Qin= 21 . 9 CFS Qout= 5 . 8 CFS 10 LAG= 20 . 3 MIN 0 8 LL 6 - 4 - 2 -__- am. cv r' T Ln - 0....... _�...._.-.....00 rn m TIME (hours ) POND 1 Subsurface Detention OUTFLOW PEAK= 5.8 CFS M 12.34 HOURS HOUR 0.00 .10 .20 .30 .40 .50 .60 .70 .80 .90 10.00 0.0 0.0 .1 .2 .3 .5 .6 .7 .8 .9 11.00 .9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.7 2.0 3 .0 12.00 4.3 5.3 5.7 5.8 5.8 5.6 5.4 5.2 4.9 4.6 13.00 4.4 4.2 4.0 3.8 3.6 3.4 3.2 3.0 2.8 2.6 14.00 2.4 2.2 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.7 15.00 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.3 16.00 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.0 .9 .9 .8 .8 17.00 .7 .7 .7 .6 .6 .6 .5 .5 - .5 .5 18 .00 I .5 .5 .4 .4 .4 .4 .4 .4 .4 .4 19.00 .4 .4 .4 .4 .3 .3 .3 .3 .3 .3 20.00 I .3 I , PIPED SYSTEM CALCULATIONS �IIEI�1■■ 1�1 lil�l�l �1lI� 1� 010191 �■lil�l�lp��18� ��i �E19��IIO =1116■01! inu amm�n ��°i��iiin��n iii�iu��n��i�u�■■d�mi■p� � ��i�YNI��1 �n�in �weuiunm �fl� �mui� e�n��Yn i�� ui m� �� i��■n��u �� CDW Consultants, Inc. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Civil & Environmental Engineers 111 Speen Street, Suite 119 FRAMINGHAM, MASSACHUSETTS 01701 Date: 03/10/1995 Job No.: 398.00 (508) 875-2657 FAX(508) 875-6617RCEFIVAtten ion: MEPA Office MQR ' 19q� develo subml for the proposed melntof 224&234 Highland Q®OGO Avenue. Salem. MA �Ya$fYetleae,�, ` TO: Secretary of Environmental Affairs 100 Cambridge Street, 20th Floor Boston, MA 02202 WE ARE SENDING YOU: X Attached _Under separate cover via MAIL the following items: _ Shop Drawings _ Prints _ Plans _ Samples _ Specifications _ Copy of Letter _ Change Order X Other Copies Date No. Description 2 03110/95 Environmental Notification Form for the proposed development of 224 &234 Highland Avenue Salem MA THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: X For Approval _ Approved as submitted _Resubmit_ copies for approval _For your use _ Approved as noted _Submit_ copies for distribution —As requested _ Returned for corrections _Return_ corrected prints For review and comment _ FORBIDS DUE_19_ _ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS: CDW has completed and is hereby submitting the above referenced ENF. Upon review, do not hesitate to contact me with any questions. Thank you for your time and assistance. COPY TO:LSee Distribution Li§t-7 SIGNED: 1-k U hn M.Walker, P.E. MCICAMCUOSS\398 MEW SSMTLT N ENVIRONMENTAL NOTIFICATION FORM I. SUMMARY A. Project Identification 1. Project Name --Retail Site Address/Location 224 & 234 Highland Avenue City/Town Salem Massachusetts 2. Project Proponent _Kennedy Development Group Address 500 Broadway Everett MA 02149 3. Est. Commencement July 1 1995 -Est. Completion"=March -1 1 99F Approx. Cost1 ..Smi Ilion, , Status of Project Design 10 %Complete. 4. Amount(if any)of bordering vegetated wetlands,salt marsh,or tidelands to be dredged, filled, removed, or altered(other than by receipt of runoff)as a result of the project. 0 acres 0 square feet. 5. This project is categorically included and therefore requires preparation of an EIR. Yes No X ? B. Narrative Project-Description Describe project and site. The existing site consists of two parcels with a total land area of approximately 3. 2 acres . One parcel is vacant and the other parcel contains an existing building which will be razed. The proposed improvements will include importing about 65, 000 cubic yards of structural fill . Two separate buildings are proposed for this development . One building will be a 22,000 square foot automotive service and supply store and the other building will be a 5, 000 square foot family restaurant . All utilities are available to the site. Proposed drainage will be controled with an underground piped detention system. Peak flows will be reduced i to less than existing conditions. Proposed sanitary will tie into the existing municipal sewer system on Highland Avenue. 7 7 { i l Copies of the complete ENF may be obtained from (proponent or agent): Name: John Walker, P. E. Firm/Agency: CDW Consultants , Inc. Address:111 Speen St Suite 119 phone No. ( 508 ) 875-2657 Framingham, MA 01701 1987 THIS IS AN IMPORTANT NOTICE. COMMENT PERIOD IS LIMITED. For Information, call (617) 727-5830 P.2 C. List the State or Federal agencies from which permits or other actions have been/will be sought: Agency Name Permit Date filed; file no. Massachusetts Highway State Highway March 30, 1995 Department Access Permit D. List any government agencies or programs from which the proponent will seek financial assistance for this project: Agency Name Funding Amount NONE E. Areas of potential impact (complete Sections II and III first, before completing this section). 1. Check all areas in which,in the proponent's judgment,an impact of this project may occur.Positive impacts,as well as adverse impacts, may be indicated. Construction Long Term Impacts Impacts Inland Wetlands..................... . ..... . . . ..... Coastal Wetlands/Beaches....... .. . ..... .... . .... Tidelands. . ............... .......... .. ... . ..... .... Traffic. . .............................. ... .. ......... X X Open Space/Recreation.. ........... .. . . . .. ..... .. Historical/Archaeological. ............. . . . . . . . . .. . Fisheries/Wildlife. .................. .... . .... . ..... Vegetation/Trees. ......... .......... . ... ..... . . . .. X X Agricultural Lands................................. Water Pollution... ................... .... ........ .. Water Supply/Use................... .... . . . .. . .... X X Solid Waste. ............ ........... ....... . ........ X X Hazardous Materials...... .... .. ... . . . ... . .... . . . . Air Pollution. .......................... .... . . . ..... Noise. ... .. ................................ ......... X Wind/Shadow... ....................... ... . .. ...... Aesthetics. ... .. .. ...... .......... .. . . ..... . . . ..... X X Growth Impacts. . .. .. .... ....... .. . . .. .. . .... . . ... Community/Housing and the Built Environment. ... .. ........ . ... . .. . . . . .. . .. . Other(Specify) 2. List the alternatives which have been considered. The alternative of no build has been considered. P.3 F. Has this project been filed with EOEA before? No X Yes EOEA No. G. WETLANDS AND WATERWAYS 1. Will an Order of Conditions under the Wetlands Protection Act (c.131s.40) or a License under the Waterways Act (c.91) be required? Yes X No 2. Has a local Order of Conditions been: N0. a. issued? Date of issuance _ ; DEQE File No. b. appealed? Yes ; No 3. Will a variance from the Wetlands or Waterways Regulations be required? Yes ; Nom_. 1I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. Map; site plan. Include an original 8t/Z x 11 inch or larger section of the most recent U.S.G.S. 7.5 minute series scale topographic map with the project area location and boundaries clearly shown. If available,attach a site plan of the proposed project. See attached locus plan in Figure 1 . B. State total area of project: 3 . 25 acres. Estimate the number of acres (to the nearest 1/10 acre) directly affected that are currently: 1. Developed .. . .... ..... . . 0 . 9 acres 6. Tidelands ............... _acres 2. Open Space,/ 7. Productive Resources Woodlands;Recreation 2_75 acres Agriculture ............. —acres 3. Wetlands . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . acres Forestry ................ acres 4. Floodplain . .. .. . . . . .. . . . acres 8. Other .. ..... ............ acres 5. Coastal Area ......... ... acres C. Provide the following dimensions, if applicable: Existing Increase Total Length in miles . . ... . .. .. . . ... . . . .. .. . .. ................ N/A Number of Housing Units . . . . . . . . . . . . .... ............. N/A Number of Stories . .. ... . .. . . . .. . . .. ....... . .... .... ... N A* 2BldosPIRA 2Bldgs 1EA Gross Floor Area in square feet . .. . . ........... ....... N/A* 27, 811 27 , 811 Number of parking spaces . . .. . . .. .......... .... ....... 20 —Jai,_ 901 Total of Daily vehicle trips to and from site (Total Trip Ends) .. ... .. . . . . ... . . . . ... .... .... ......... 0 1 , 286 1 , 286 Estimated Average Daily Traffic on road(s) serving site .. . . . ... . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . ... ..... - 1. Highland Avenue 24, 000vod. 1 2RFvnd.'--2-5, 286vpd. 2. Marlborough Road 16 . 600vpd . 90y d- 16 . 69 vpd. 3. * The existing 2 story 6, 070 sf building will be demolished. D. TRAFFIC PLAN. If the proposed project will require any permit for access to local roads or state highways, attach a sketch showing the location and layoui of the proposed driveway(s). See attached plan. PA III. ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Instructions: Explain direct and indirect adverse impacts, including those arising from general construction and operations. For every answer explain why significant adverse impact is considered likely or unlikely to result. Positive impact may also be listed and explained. Also, state the source of information or other basis for the answers supplied. Such environmental information should be acquired at least in part by field inspection. A. Open Space and Recreation 1. Might the project affect the condition, use, or access to any open space and/or recreation area? Explanation and Source: Open space or recreation areas are located 1/4 mile North and 1/2 mile Southeast of the site. The project should not interfere with the condition, use or access to any of these areas . Source: Debra Hurlburt, Planning Assistant,City of 2. Is the project site within 500 feet of any public open space,recreation,or conservation land? Salem. Explanation and Source: The project is not located within 500-feet of any public open space, recreation, or conservation land. Source: Debra Hurlburt, Planning Assistant, City of Salem & MA DEP GIS Map. B. Historic and Archaeological Resources 1. Might any site or structure of historic significance be affected by the project? (Prior consultation with Massachusetts Historical Commission is advised.) Explanation and Source: Maps reviewed at The Massachusetts Historical Commission showed that the site has no historical significance. 2. Might any archaeological site be affected by the project? (Prior consultation with Massachusetts Historical Commission is advised.) Explanation and Source: Maps reviewed at The Massachusetts Historical Commission showed that the site has no archaeological significance. C. Ecological Effects 1. Might the project significantly affect fisheries or wildlife, especially any rare or endangered species? (Prior consultation with the Massachusetts Natural Heritage Program is advised). Explanation and Source: The January, 1994 Edition of The Atlas of Estimated Habitats of State-Listed Rare Wetlands Wildlife, published by The Massachusetts Natural Heritage Program, show the closest habitat being over 2 miles West of the site. Correspondence from The Massachusetts Natural Heritage Program stating that there are no rare or endangered species of plant or animal life in the vicinity of the site is attached. P.5 2. Might the project significantly affect vegetation, especially any rare or endangered species of plant? (Prior consultation with the Massachusetts Natural Heritage Program is advised.) (Estimate approximate number of mature trees to be removed: ± 200 ) Explanation and Source: The existing building, surrounding trees, and miscellaneous scrub and brush will be cleared to construct the proposed buildingsand parking area. New landscaping will provide a positive impact upon the aesthetics of the property. According to The Massachusetts Natural Heritage Program "Atlas of Estimated Habitats of State-Listed Rare Wetlands Wildlife" ,there are no rare or endangered species of plant on the property. The majority of trees to be cleared are not considered "Specimen" quality trees. 3.Agricultural Land.Has any portion of the site been in agricultural use within the last 15 years? If yes, specify use and acreage. Explanation and Source: The site, or any portion thereof, has not been used as agricultural land within the past 15 years. Source: Debra Hurlburt, Planning Assistant, City of Salem. D. Water Quality and Quantity 1. Might the project result in significant changes in drainage patterns? Explanation and Source: Drainage calculations have been performed for the pre- and post-developed conditions using a 25-year, 24-hour storm event. The pre-developed flow is . 8 . 6 CFS for a 25-Year, 24-hour storm.. The post-developed flow will be 17.Ocfs with no detention structure and 4.4cfs with detention structures for the same storm event. Proposed detention structures are shown on the attached Figure 3. Source: Project Documents 2.Might the project result in the introduction of any pollutants,including sediments,into marine waters, surface fresh waters or ground water? Explanation and Source: Construction and operation of the site will not result in the introduction of any pollutants, , including sediments, into marine water, surface fresh watersor groundwater. Source: Past projects that are similar in nature and scope. 3. Does the project involve any dredging? No x Yes Volume . If 10,000 cy or more, attach completed Standard Application Form for Water Quality Certification, Part I (314 CMA 9.02(3), 9.90, DEQE Division of Water Pollution Control). Not Applicable. P.6 4. Will any part of the project be located in flowed or filled tidelands, Great Ponds, or other waterways?(Prior consultation with the DEQE and CZM is advised.) Explanation and Source: The project will not be located in flowed or filled tidelands, great ponds , or other waterways . Source: DEP & CZM. Telephone correspondence on Feb. 8 , 1995. 5. Will the project generate or convey sanitary sewage? No Yes X if Yes, Quantity: 8 , 610 gallons per day Disposal by: (a) Onsite septic systems ... ....................... Yes No X (b) Public sewerage systems (location; average and peak daily flows to treatment works) ........... .:..................... Yes X No Explanation and Source: The site will utilize the existing Salem Waste Water Treatment Plant for its wastewater disposal. The restaurant is expected to generate approximately 7, 500gpd and Pep Boys building is expected to generate approximately 1 , 110gpd. Source: 310 CMR 15. 00, :-Title. V 6. Might the project result in an increase in paved or impervious surface over a sole source aquifer or an aquifer recognized as an important present or future source of water supply? Explanation and Source: The project does not lie over a sole source aquifer or an aquifer recognized as an important present or future source .of water supply. The impervious area will increase from 15, 200 sq. ft. to 143 , 111 sq. ft . An increase of 127, 911 sq. ft. Source: MA DEP GIS Map & Project Documents. 7. is the project in the watershed of any surface water body used as a drinking water supply? Explanation and Source: The project is not located in the watershed of any surface water body used as a drinking water supply. Source: Michael P. Collins ,. Salem Engineering Office 8. Are there any public or private drinking water wells within a 1/2-mile radius of the proposed project? Explanation and Source: A list was supplied by the Salem Engineers Office detailing properties in Salem that have private water wells. The following three properties , that were noted on the list, lie within 1/2 mile of the site: 14 Glen Avenue 16 Glen Avenue 205 Highland Avenue (Vincent Potato Chip) P.7 9. Does the operation of the project result in any increased consumption of water? Approximate consumption 8 , 610 gallons per day. Likely water source(s) Salem Municipal Explanation and Source: Currently the site is unoccupied, and therefore its water consumption is Ogpd . Past records from the Salem Water Department show that the site used approximately .15gpd of water. The proposed restaurant and Pep Boys is expected to generate less than 8 , 610 gpd. Source : 310 CMR 15. 00, Title V. E. Solid Waste and Hazardous Materials 1. Estimate types and approximate amounts of waste materials generated, e.g., industrial, domestic, hospital, sewage sludge, construction debris from demolished structures. How/ where will such waste be disposed of? Explanation and Source: The demolition of the existing structure is expected to generate less than 500 cubic yards of debris . An unknown amount of waste will be generated during construction. During operation the restaurant is expected to generate approximately 355lb/day and Pep Boys is expected to generate less than 60lb/day. Total : ±415 lb/day. It is expected that used tires & other automotive parts will be recycled. 2. Might the project involve the generation, use, transportation, storage;release, or disposal of potentially hazardous maierialsy Explanation and Source: Part of the project(Pep Boys)includes an automotive service center, which will involve the generation, use and storage of hazardous materials such as lubricating oils,waste oil, and other substances regulated under the RCRA program. The site will be regulated under the EPA RCRA program for the proper storage and recycling or disposal of these materials. Automotive fluids will also be stored at the site for retail sale. Source: Project Documents 3. Has the site previously been used for the use, generation, transportation, storage, release, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials? Explanation and Source: The site has not been used for the generation,transportation, or release of potentially hazardous materials. There is evidence that some fill material and construction debris have been disposed of at the site. The site is currently vacant, and was previously a sign making company known as the Salem Sign Company. The use and storage of potentially hazardous materials may have occurred as part of the sign making operation. Source: Salem City Directories and Project Documents F. Energy Use and Air Quality 1. Will space heating be provided for the project? if so, describe the type, energy source, and approximate energy consumption. Explanation and Source: ace heating. It is expected that the garage service area will us sp The number and type of units are not yet known. P.8 2. Will the project require process heat or steam? If so, describe the proposed system,the fuel type, and approximate fuel usage. Explanation and.Source: This project will not require process heat or steam. Source: Project Documents 3. Does the project include industrial processes that will release air contaminants to the atmosphere? If so,describe the process (type, material released,and quantity released). Explanation and Source: This project will not include industrial processes that will release air contaminants to the atmosphere. Source: Project Documents 4.Are there any other sources of air contamination associated with the project(e.g.automobile traffic, aircraft traffic,volatile organic compound storage, construction dust)? Explanation and Source: The sources of air contamination produced as a direct result of the project include temporary construction dust and additional automobile traffic. The construction dust will be minimized through the use of water and calcium chloride as required. The automobile traffic will consist of an approximate . 1 , 286 additional vehicles per day at the intersection.- Source: Project Documents 5. Are there any sensitive receptors (e.g. hospitals, schools, residential areas) which would be affected by air contamination caused by the project? Explanation and Source: Although Mr. Michael Collins of The City Engineers Office referred to several sensitive receptors in the area (Salem High School — 1/2 mile NE, Salem Hospital — l mile NE, Salem Medical Center — 1 mile NE) , these receptors will not be affected by the proposed project. G. Noise 1. Might the project result in the generation of noise? (Include any source of noise during construction or operation, e.g., engine exhaust, pile driving, traffic.) Explanation and Source: The project will result in additional noise during site construction. This noise will mainly consist of engine exhaust from the heavy equipment. Noise during site operation will consist of cars and trucks entering and existing the facility. Source: Previous Similar Projects P.9 2. Are there any sensitive receptors(e.g., hospitals,schools, residential areas)which would be affected by any noise caused by the project? Explanation and Source: There are no sensitive receptors identified in the vicinity of the site that would be affected by any noise generated by the project. Source : Field Inspection and Conversation with the City Engineers Office 3. Is the project a sensitive receptor,sited in an area of significant ambient noise? Explanation and Source: The project is not a sensitive receptor. Source: Previous Similar Projects H. Wind and Shadow 1. Might the project cause wind and shadow impacts on adjacent properties? Explanation and Source: Currently the site lies in a relatively low area. Approximately 65, 000 cubic yards of fill are required to bring the site to grade with its surrounding abutters . As a result, wind and shadow impacts are not expected. Source: Project Documents . 1. Aesthetics 1. Are there any proposed structures which might be considered incompatible with existing adjacent structures in the vicinity in terms of size, physical proportion and scale, or significant differences in land use? Explanation and Source: The proposed buildings will be compatible with the surrounding properties which consist of retail, commercial and residential properties. Source: Site visit and conversation with Debra A.L. Hurlburt of the Planning Department, City of Salem. 2. Might the project impair visual access to waterfront or other scenic areas? Explanation and Source: The project will not impair visual access to waterfront or other scenic areas. Source: Field Inspection P.10 IV. CONSISTENCY WITH PRESENT PLANNING Discuss consistency with current federal, state and local land use, transportation, open space, recreation and environmental plans and policies. Consult with local or regional planning authorities where appropriate. The site lies in a business zone on Route 107 in Salem. The proposed site is consistent with its surrounding properties , which include restaurants and retail stores. Consultation- with-the local Planning Department was made in _reaching this conclusion. V. FINDINGS AND CERTIFICATION A. The public notice of environmental review has been/will be published in the following newspaper(s): (NAME) Salem Evening (Date; March 10 , 1995- News B. This form has been circulated to all agencies and persons as required by 301 CMR 11.24. Date i nature of Responsible Officer Date Sig afore of person preparing or Project Proponent E F(if different from above) Thomas G. Kennedy ohn M. Walker Name (print or type) Name (print or type) Address 500 Broadway Address 111 Speen St. , 5. 119 Everett, MA 02149 Framingham, MA 01701 Telephone Number ( 617) 387-1700 Telephone Number (508 ) 875-2657 Environmental Notification Form Distribution List Pep Boys 224 & 234 Highland Avenue Salem, MA Secretary of Environmental Affairs Massachusetts Highway Department 100 Cambridge Street, 20th Floor 10 Park Plaza-Room 4260 Boston, MA 02202 Boston, MA 02116 Attn: MEPA Office Executive Office of Transportation and Department of Environmental Protection Construction One Winter Street 10 Park Plaza-Room 3510 Boston, MA 02202 Boston,MA 02116-3969 Department of Environmental Protection Environmental Coordinator Northeast Regional Office Mass. Bay Transit Authority 10 Commerce Way 10 Park Plaza- 6th Floor Woburn, MA 01801 Boston,MA 02116-3966 Executive Office of Communities and Development State Clearinghouse 100 Cambridge Street, Room 1803 Boston, MA 02202 Massachusetts Historical Commission 80 Boylston Street Boston, MA 02116 Metropolitan Area Planning Council 60 Temple Place Boston, MA 02108 Massachusetts Highway Dept. -District#4 519 Appleton Street Arlington, MA 02174 Salem Conservation Commission One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Salem Planning Department One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 �4 s � ary • � � � fti rs de �'G avel�- - - - 'S ry 7. F ` � .- \ � ��I • '• /its-� •• /1 I' �. � G/i, � y :i�,J .:1- r � . ../\ - . arc, / it .. •�, -. . .�_'n/lt � / / rsH.�� ,/J, J•c // _ PaP P'Qj� 'q• d �� % , 'e i -t" !i i r� a - - � � C i -a din � I �� - -- - 3 •621 � I� I �- fiadioT� r5 y, ' � • all- an d s n(, �•7 �� I2E CHA c� i �b- ■ .�? 31 :�I r � —..� •�II i t :I/r�� i r: � �_ �/ " '' �. � Park rs -• hel ♦•, � Ce r I � � � Golf Course S I S^g�}e i - I y PP1ng �° '• •� Hi - t �• ��_ � P e��PlI7G E�IaY9ro ri [ li � '� �• `� ' �-a� �!/, ��, __/I I�•�r �<� � /i Ram�� ` �� Fev a i.�s K "wood- E, t • F ��\ 1 I A r -�♦ M v � sr / � � -t � i F' _,,,_ r i �_;�� t I s � ��0� �� - I � rL.l•,.� L� • Commo I• c �� `��.,o� • � � � '1 \ � � Ci Hal .. ��, • sma, � �. �� t I�r. � � 'ti r t St ri c ST r1'1 ow i WX h r < • a r �:. �-� d �� I� . r sr cb ? � I - _ \::, �� l ,moi�� o o. � � Q • � �.� � � N no oh r p t I w s sr ois i F - %�� o d qe O7 � i//�� e Peau_ > � ✓ ♦ � � �.J � , ' ,�2 i�\ " rrE . �\ A ENF Figure 1 Locus Mau row Pep Boys Automotive Supply Store P, Golf ce ase, 224 & 234 Highland Avenue � tG � 4 0 i IG `12F'AF rto : ,� , ti ._ � Salem, Massachusetts Sd� d /, saes,V 4s, ,aQ galem_ MA Ouadranele Mau. 1985 Commonwealth of Massachusetts Division of Fisheries &Wildlife Wayne F. MacCallum, Director 2 February 1995 Mr. William J. Cundiff CDW Consultants, Inc. 111 Speen St., Suite 119 Framingham, MA 01701 Re: 222-244 Highland Avenue, Retail Site ENF Salem, MA NHESP File No. 95-49 Dear Mr. Cundiff, Thank you for contacting the Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program for information regarding state-listed rare species in the vicinity of the project referred to above. At this time we are not aware of any rare plants or animals or exemplary natural communities that would be adversely affected by the proposed project. This review concerns only rare species of plants and animals and ecologically significant natural communities for which our program maintains site-specific records. This review does not rule out the possibility that more common wildlife or vegetation might be adversely affected by the project, especially if it will modify currently undeveloped areas. Should project plans change, or new rare species information become available, this evaluation may have to be reconsidered. Please call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Todd Ongaro Environmental Review Assistant �y y�yµ kJf t Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program 100 Cambridge Street, Boston, IvLA 02202 (61?) 72'-9194, (617) 727-3151 �� An r��,encv of the Department of Fisheries. Wildhic & Environmental Lai. Enforcement w ��oa�arc, �/lCccz�ac/zu�ella 02202 COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT February 14, 1995 Michael W. Rademacher CDW Consultants 111 Speen Street, Suite 119 Framingham, MA 01701 . Re: Mishawum Road in Woburn and Washington Street in Salem; Salem-Woburn. Dear Mr. Rademacher: The Massachusetts Coastal Zone Management (MCZM) Office has received your package of information, including plans, for the proposed sites on Washington Street in Salem and Mishawum Road in Woburn. The activities associated with this project fall outside the geographical boundaries of the Massachusetts coastal zone as delineated in Chapter 5: Massachusetts Coastal Regions and An Atlas of Resources, 1 June 1977 and further described in the Massachusetts Coastal Zone Management Plan, and therefore are not subject to federal consistency review by this Office. Thank you for submitting the information to MCZM. If you have any questions regarding our review process, feel free to call me at (617) -727-9530. Sincerely, V . Ja a W. Mead, oject Review Coordinator JWM/jwm cc: Karen Kirk Adams, Section Chief Regulatory Branch, NED, US Army Corps of Engineers 100°% RECYCLED PAPER KENNEDY DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC. SOO Broadway Everett, Meueaehuselly 02149 Bus. (617) 387-17UO Fax. (617) _787-2152 March 3, 1995 Mr. John Walker CDW Consultants, Inc. 111 Speen Street, Suite 119 Framingham, MA 01701 Re: 224 S 234 Highland Avenue, Salem, MA Dear Mr, Walker: I hereby authorize you to sign, on my behalf, the Environmental Notification Form for MEPA review and/or any related documents that are required. ery t ul yours Thomas G. Kennedy President TGK: jmm I�II�I�', -®' �.r�•�ilii��iii��►° � IIII�I�� ,� •. _ _�=t�i�J;)� ;��I��>•�►`�t\l� �\�� 111111 .�� iPlr►_ � �� IIS � � I� l��I1�_,.�ii►- I��" � /I/ ""/�i ��i�� i ' ► �!� _ _ - 'lull' yi • ALM Aa�.,�I� L 22 PROPOSED BUILDING d ID WTR.Dart• Ns ® Q m Z6.acral � w S a 9 2l lace 1 `Q+I^ O \� s old I I Lt I I I I I I I -H I I R.{LK •r0� Z 1 1 o Mr.m+u wv a'R�-d.e E111- 1946 HIGHLAN c STATE HIGHWAY LAYOUT ) _ �� 1 �F•' I s J 1 = ^^ ca . 1. j4g�o �1 M � R M pW-111. 3 as � V — 1+4100 00 � 1I 6200 Rau = es.z 1 $ � 1 � 1 {L N S27 E a[nnrx wue¢was 6D6,96' vac t69 � vac Rs ®facrl aw acamr) � �,� r�90r - a.oUar�w FIGURE 3 Opo398.00 Elm N 0 A' w aac 2 o L—Ot _ N 52'07'34" E 231.97' s �— a«a ase. �1 �a N62 02'19" E _ N 51 53'36" E 157.93' - 48.36" -` 78.44 — _ N 51'53'36" E ' *0 I a s.es 0 N PROPOSED BUILDING n` ...� > � W.a -ws �+ xs sue. N N �I00 C Z za sss N N N WI(P W N m soca C 9 eves 75' 0 1 L N � 9 r � _ a akoPom etXDM a a.0".w iiL S 51'53'36" W 336.06' _ -51 _ z S 51'53'36" W 219.24' 1 HIGHLAND ( 1946 STATE HIGHWAY LAYOUT ) E I o � J ft/�11 .YO CD 1 a rnwi[ Z �g,.t✓gt� s�.ao I 9 ::W w ° aar.E: r-w 00398.00 FIGURE 2 ft L-01 NO DATE REVISIONS 3/_31/q5 RLEAT FCR WWV B 4/27/q5 REVISE FOR M AI•MIG MDAIC li h N ool� N25 07'34" E / 0 o 191.97' 9�6 9494—.;, C CLOVfRD 9��GP rCF L VER04 ALE A I 94-5 r ON S�fET 2J AVENUE "' F o GREENZA WNz I I 1 4r 9A' v n AVENUE ORLEANS AVENUE (If 9vA �. y� 0 LOT a B' HIGLAND 1 DISTRICT N\�PNO AVENUE A AVENUE R-1 DISTRICT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - � _ - - - - - - -- - - -- - - - - - - - -- - - -- - - - - - - -- -- ---- -- 9+-� ...�_1 .�IR�T B-2 DISTRICT B-2 DISTRICT B-2 DISTRICT \ z Q y Z N S 62=1g w D94-1 287.82. \ LOCUS PLAN SCALE 1"-500' I I \ 1 6IG�\p SEAL AF O N IA N :;:._, p 0) 1,�: WALKER n \ to j�ti Ilk 2714rLn • " A �l4 IQ un N OVERLAY DISTRICT OVERLAY DISTRICT OVERLAY DISTRICT � Co DATE MARCH 17, lq95 f � r / %r � 'Y �/ , — DRAWN RJM SCALE _ -. .'; 267.60' 74 ' ?G' — - PROP. N CROSSWALK -1' I - N 51'53 36 E� , ui \. _ ' AVENUE w �` `.-' ; ,1 z HIGHLAND 1946 STATE HIGHWAY LAYOUT > AVENU Q �e _ N s - -- - - . -a. . k it47) - I ..msn..:.�..+..�...e..en.-....�.e..6�.-.s- �4AF•-'Y _ -'.. � ._. ... ... . _ ti77 6CiR ) v I 59 00 60 00 61+00 62 OO 63 00 64 00 65 00 66+00 6700 N 52'1534 E 888.98' � � � L8 !OPEN 80% Cut,VSRT' u j r i 1 .' Q1 I I I Z I I 4 ,tGHinsl J AVENUE �I HIGHLAND >M pp 5400 O Lu I I i r a w LEGEND C/l EXISTING PROPOSED 436 CONTOUR V / —0— S70RM DRAIN _'C S , .,.� �--.+—•�rte. �V—W— WATER W l'�C" r wi ELECTRIC MANHOLE _71.d� .. - .3- Y� E ELECTRICAL E - -G — GAS _G — S G S — SANITARY SEWER :: ,JNt 1614.55' _ HYDRANT m SEWER MANHOLE D7 I \) — VALVE MANHOLE �- - ? ; HIGHLAND AVENUE —EI--D — CATCH BASIN EXISTING l^_ Y�IOCAPE COD BERM � I \` 429x5 SPOT GRADE ,.� HP RAMP —� 67 OO HAY BALES W\ _X_ X— I ' SILTATION FENCE 1 0 SET POLE NOTES I S 51 21'05" W 6108.32' L 0 1. ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS OBTAINED FROM A SURVEY CONDUCTED BY UTILITY POLE GLM ENGINEERING, INC., HOLLISTON, MASSACHUSETTS, IN JANUARY, 1995. �- POST INDICATOR VALVE 2. THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES IS APPROXIMATE. THE CONTRACTOR 0 15 30' 60' TRAFFIC DIRECTION SHALL CONTACT "DIG—SAFE" AT 1-800-332-4844 BEFORE CONDUCTING ANY EXCAVATION OR DEMOLITION. 00398.00 NO DATE REVISIONS A 331 W EAX FCR %WV TABLE (IPORNTURES B 4/27/1115 FCR P ~G WNT (TIE INTO EXISTING OFFSITE CULVERTS) SLOPE RIM INVERT STRUCTURE (FT/FT) (FEET) (FEET) SPECIAL STRUCTURE #1 108.5 48"0 INV.=90.6 18" 3' CULVERT (IN) 0.01 995.5 4.5 to s DRAIN MANHOLE 1 E 107.0 olovf tiG�� r r-- (-�.-•--.. � PROP. CB #11 # vER Ro�E F - 94-5 18" CLDI (IN) 0.01 93.1 �N S7RffT AVENUE ^ \ ! J PROP. DMH #11 18" HDPE OUT 0,01 92.1 ' w P \ 'f r --- Tt INV.=91.4 `,e (OUT) _ DRAIN MANHOLE #2E (DROP) 102.2 ceE£� z I -�^ i - 9 INV.=90.6 18" HDPE (IN) 0.01 88.8 f - - - - - - - _ �i ul AWN q 6£ly z � Ok 9A� INV.=80.0 12" HDPE (IN) 0.005 81.5 LEgNS AVENUE \ I /f PROP DMH #7- = _ = 4 =I'- FLT-I _ ;a LO pT # - - - - - L -- --I-- - - 1- - 24" HDPE (OUT) 0.005 81.5 - AVENUE A H SAND A w __ __ R- IS CT DRAIN MANHOLE #2E (DROP) 101 .4 HI�,yL+o `ENDE R -1 DISTRIC�T _ __ �_ �, _� __ _ __, _ - w �y1 .P_TRL. _ A 24" HDPE (OUT) 0.005 80.4 9-2 DISTRICT B-2 DISTRICT PROP. 8" SPRINKLER PROP. ELECTRIC " PROP TELEPHONE y + L-� PROP. 4* DOMESTIC 100 �- P. 4" GAS INV.=80.1 TABLE OF PROPOSED STORM DRAINAGE STRUCTURES t PROP. RD #LOCUS PLAN - III IIIII I I �- SLOPE RIM INVERT STRUCTURE (FT/FT) (FEET) (FEET)SCALE 1.- Z/- PROP. DMH #6 6" INV 92.6 AREA DRAIN #1 SEAL . 1PROP. DBLE CB #8 I I I I - PROP. DMH #3c 1 12 HDPE (OUT) 0.01 102.0 f t I CATCH BASIN #1 107.D •F OF y� I / / LT ' PROPOSED BUILDING I � � I 1 - 12" HDPE (IN) 0.01 101.5 �� w' ' PRCP. DBLE ' FF, ELEV. _ 503 I � 1 - 12" HDPE (OUT) 0.01 101.0 Mrtre CB #7 PROP. DMH #3 PROP. RD #4 I I� DRAIN MANHOLE #1 106.3 WAI Kf-R II ' 1 - 12" HDPE (IN) 0.01 100.6 w: a,; c 2 - 6" HDPE (IN) 0.01 100.6 • PROP. DMH #5I I �� ` 3 - 12" HDPE (OUT) 0.01 100.5 l f = 92.6 I (W DRAIN MANHOLE #2 4 6" INV 106.3 1 - 12" HDPE (IN) 0.01 100.0 PROP. DMH #2 - / ��11 2 2 - 6" HDPE (IN) 0.01 100.6 \ I PROP. CB OP. DBLE CB #6 3 1 PROP. DBLE CB d? #5 I I 1 1 3 - 12" HDPE (OUT) 0.03 99.5 . #1 I L II PROP. RD #3 I IIDRAIN MANHOLE #3 103.3 PRCP. DMH #1 3 -- _I I II --- - -- - OVERLAY DISTRICT r, Z 1 I --J - I OVERLAY DISTRICT I II 1 _-- 2 - 12" HDPE (IIN) 0.01 94.9 _ !OVERLAY DISTRICT 0.005 94.75 nf , ( I - PROP. CB #10 3 - 12" HDPE (OUT) 0.01 94.0 I I I LJ� I I PRUP. DMH #4 " I ' I I l CATCH BASIN 2 101.4 10 III v7 6 INV = 92.6 III # 8 1 - 12" HDPE (OUT) 0.005 96.8 / I PROP. CB #3 I I + CATCH BASIN #3 103,2 I II PROP. RD #1 1 - 12" HDPE (OUT) 0.01 98.2 L PROP, DMH # 8 CATCH BASIN #4 101.8 PROP. RD #2 - - 1 - 12" HDPE (OUT) 0.005 96.8 w I POSED BUILDING, _ _ I1�� • W _ DRAIN MANHOLE #4 (6' DIA.) 103.1 / -FF. ELEV. = 107 PROP_ SMH ? I) I I PROP. CB #9 1 - 12" HDPE (IN) 0.005 A M 9 95 c7 I 1 2 - 12" HDPE (IN) 0.005 96.4 lo, - r � 4 DPAWN PROP. AD #1 3 - 12HDPE (IN) 0.005 98.1 6" SCALE PROP, 4 - 12' R _30 HOPE (OUT) 0.005 96.0 I I •--- PROP. ELECTRIC ._ PROP. LAROP SMH _ j PROP, TELEPHONE G PROP " G GAS G `-�" DOUBLE CATCH BASIN #5 101.8 1 1 \ I 106.5 41 - 12" HDPE (OUT) 0.01 96.8 I -- --'�� •� I I III ----- DOUBLE CATCH BASIN #6 101.8 1UA :" w.,$ ." 13s �•, . .� .r _ .....- _A: " E (OUT)6i - 0.01 103.5 96.8 PPVC SEWER r%vr. Sad DRAIN MANHOLE DIA.)CAO'S SrAL - 1DPEIN) 0.01 95.7 w -- < ti 3 PROP. DMH #2Ey., R Im 2 - 12" HDPE (IN) 0.01 96.79 PROP. WET TAPPING R� x -'.5 �` _ i __. ,,._.. __ __. T z 4 - 12" HDPE (OUT) 0.01 95.Og z I SLEEVE & VALVElk I HOPE ( ) 0.01 HIGHL AN ( 1946 STATE HIGHWAY LAYOUT ) AVS NL E I_j AVENUE ." PROP, SPECIAL I - 1 / ' 7=_7- DOUBLE CATCH BASIN #7 101.8 STRUCTURE #1 __-- - _ sm- _�__. _ter _ .,._.-=. ._i Is 1 - 12" HDPE (OUT) 0.01 96.8 �.. -'v - j - - - SL'JPi.'. FAra n:;il+ I� DOUBLE CATCH BASIN #8 101.8 1 - 12" HDPE (OUT) 0.02 96.8 ..Es DRAIN MANHOLEd6 (6' DIA.) 102.9 59 00 60 DO 61+DO 62 00 63 00 fi 0 65 00 66+00 67 00 39.7 I 1 - 12" HDPE (IN) 0.01 93.75 2 _ 12" HDPE (IN) 0.02 96.8 - I 888.9 4 - 15' HDPE (OUT) 0.01 93.0 N 52'1534 E DRAIN MANHOLE #7 102.3 PROP. DMH #2E - I 1 - 15" HDPE IN) 0.01 92.0 ,ALL 0,3 PROP. CB #2 PROP. CB #4 2 - 12 HDPE (OUT) 0.01 91.5 I L+ aDx CLLVERT) PROP. DMH #1 E #9 101.4 / r ,I 74L CATCH BASIN 1 - 12" HDPE (OUT) 0.005 95.7 i PROP, WET TAPPING CATCH BASIN 10 101.4 SLEEVE 6c VALVE 1 - 12 HDPE (OUT) 0.005 95.2 DRAIN MANHOLE #8 102.0 1 - 12" HDPE (IN) 0.02 94.6 2 - 12" HDPE (IN) 0.02 94.6 I 3 - 12" HDPE (OUT) 0.02 93.6 I a I I CATCH BASIN #11 97.4 ay z I I 1 - 12" HDPE (OUT) 0.01 92.4 UGHTGPOST - AVENUE 'I N HI AND oo 540o oa I Q M PROP. SMH W W / / ) LEGEND Y ¢ `; / -/,• i f EXISTING PROPOSED 436 CONTOUR /- / % r -D- STORM DRNi I' / 1 /! � ,// / / _._-�- r-�-'-._--_. AI -W- WATER yy - u R�'.. I \. ��.�r� +' PVC PIPEl!', -_---_ �� 1 ® ELECTRIC MANHOLE i // .•'_"i j `.� r •�( i,M =71 _. _E _ ELECTRICAL E -G - CAS C1 1 'Ass_ , r•---.. _ - 5 - SANITARY SEWER -��- 1 IC' PROP. 6" PVC .,EWER 1614.55 PROP. 6m PVC SEWER .. �. HYDRANT y I CU i �, 'S..` ® SEWER MANHOLE fw Rip -m _ _ AVENUE IN'; ® VALVE MANHOLE , z I HIGHLAND , Rira 75.5 -E}-O - CATCH BASIN Q I _ ..�...... �.. -- =.e....��,�...�.._ - _ .. -. _-__,.r-.. _.. ' . V ,=i I GRADM AND -- CAPE COO BERM I .� unl.l'TEs 429x5 SPOT GRADE HP RAMPfl 67 00 I 176 i HAY BALES W\ I SILTATION FENCE -X- X- 1 ® SET POLE r4OTES I - S 51'21'05" W 608-32' LIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII02 1. ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS OBTAINED FROM A SURVEY CONDUCTED BY UTILITY POLE GLM ENGINEERING, INC., HOLLISTON, MASSACHUSETTS, IN JANUARY, 1995. 1 POST NTO DICAR VALVE _1 2. THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES IS APPROXIMATE. THE CONTRACTOR 0 15 30' 60' TRAFFIC OFECYION SHALL CONTACT "DIG-SAFE" AT 1-800-332-4844 BEFORE CONDUCTING ANY EXCAVATION OR DEMOLITION. oo39s.00 = NO DATE REVISIONS 3/31/95 MfASF KR F1)1,EV B 4/27/95 WVU KR PLNMfiG DOAM i •tiY V� o `� -� C(OVfR94-5 y V OQV REf) AVENUErlAb 0 EEAR.4ft �N z \ !r / _ — = r = = 98 9A,4 �� A : i' I — ORLEANS A1'ENUE / '' LO OT I _R— IS Q� AVENUE A HIGLAND �Q _ _ _ _ � __ _ _.� __� _.� .�_ _�. _._ . 8-2 DISTRICT_ � �.� � �� _ ? �.._ � �� ^VENUE R -1 DISTRICT 8-2 DISTRICT N N 9A 2 PROP. SILTATION FENCE -- II94-1 100 f � f LOCUS PLAN SCALE 1'-500' jj / SEAL 4� ' �� ✓ PROPOSED BUILDING IIII ,TYY ,.F4;F FF. E>EV. - 103 III WAiRFR ( I I I Y I I1 I �� IIII A,. - - - L L_ - -- - -- - - - - - I -- - - - - CT OvERLAY DISTRICT " I aVERLAY P.STR A IIII rC�/FRLAY DISTRICT PROP. STRAW L_J \ BALES I II PROP. STRAW BALES I -- - __—_-------- ?AFT.'• V.D[R;R I - I �i Tl as.s, PROPOSED I - II III ( ( I •�' , r IN, . ROPOSED BUILDING I ,o� I I I IDATE MARCH 17. 19CE FF. ELEV. 107 i ` q1 y `.. �, __-=-`.. `- ' ,%' /) // % I I .—' '.tjCc074` -'.-__• . _-__ -_ r1 / 0 t lc x SCALE '''f \'\ I - � _• -- .—,.._`^- _ �� __ I 1 kava F!2(:!/ r1104 102�ULI FIROP. ,.. CRC=SWALF: I - ,_t:,R �e3wo.._-._..,..+nii.wr� ,.-. _.. . .. ........ 'P;. •�'R':P' I - 4Wft C, - ` N ;i R(9 R5R m ZA. ' HIGHLAND ( 1946 STATE HIGHWAY LAYOUT ) ^ AVENUE F Iz ILJ ? L ' UE — — r AVENUE Q .moi, _rt .,nf.FFtt. 4 _ ��'r- - a. .a61°SL.. Tbi ' .__... .. ':a:.,-, .z,, s y` ,•=_ ,. --a_--.�._. -..._r•5- "..'.•'^"e' :-e..__- _ _ - ., - ... - 1 . 63 00 6 00 65 OD 66 00 67 00 59 00 60 DO 61+00 � 1` I r-• M_i 1 .76 I N 5275'34• E _. _ 888 98' co Rot, c x\ERn '1/1 I I f QI I I ZI I 4 6NT C5' AVENUE Ul I N s!. HIGHLAND g I I 59 DD Q I I � I I a i` W LliLEGEND x / . EXISTING PROPOSED / / J♦�,/i r�rr/ / / !'`/i // / /' / 1 // f/� 4M CONTOUR r r r —D— STCRM ORAN {T % f/' [; :°DST - - P'IK PIDE _ Oji �h - ti{l *b� - T,• ,- dF1. —W— WATER W -•'"`i ` `.� ELECTRIC MANHOLE - :-y —E — ELECTRICAL E I _ . __ __._ —• —G — CAS C — s — SANITARY SEWER _—_— I 1614.55' �- HYDRANT I " �•V RfN - 7j ® SEWER MANHOLE m I .4 r AVENUE HK HIGHLAND ® DRAM MANHOLE Owl Z — VALVE —Q-O — CATCH BASIN -f- I ... . .._ '.c EROSHN CAPE CCD BERM I ,.. .. IT1 C��t�/r OT 429x5 SPGRADE [� -�x 67j'OD FP RMP NAY BALE -�( X� I _ SILTATION FENCE _ Q LIGHT POLE NOSES I - - S 51'21'05» W 608.32' ® MEE 1. ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS OBTAINED FROM A SURVEY CONDUCTED BY DTA POLE GLM ENGINEERING, INC., HOLLISTON, MASSACHUSETTS, IN JANUARY, 1995. I 0 15 30' 60' POST NDICATUR vALYE —t .n 2. THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES IS APPROXIMATE. THE CONTRACTOR TRAFFIC DIRECTON ..♦ SHALL CONTACT "DIG-SAFE" AT 1-800-332-4544 BEFORE CONDUCTING ANY EXCAVATION OR DEMOLITION. 00398.00 NO DATE REVISIONS A 3/3l/q5 RIEASE FOR REWV 8 4/27/q5 Br FOR PLANING BOAM ZONING TABLE - LOT A & LOT B N PROP. SNOW STORAGE AREA HIGHWAY BUSINESS (B-2) DISTRICT ��r N 52'07'34" E 9„� DIMENSIONAL PROVIDED 91 , ' REQUIRED Z 97 9s s REGULATIONS LOT A LOT B o Rio 00 MIN. LOT AREA 20,000 SF 52,890 SF 99,388 SF CSO x A PARKING SPACE 30• 94-5 CLO�R ��f F ; Co 9 X17 (TYp ) MIN. LOT WIDTH 100 FT Doo J�` OA(f AVENUE '^ N W/ 2' OVERHANG f�� 9�6 204.84 FT 191.97 FT SHEET 2 rn MIN. FRONT YARD 30 FT 10 FT* 72.96 FT o GREENLAWN i c� Q AVENUE > I �� ga-4 MIN. SIDE YARD 10 FT 56.76 FT 45.02 FT ou ORLEANS AVENUE J 10 spaces �p MIN. REAR YARD 30 FT 158.69 FT 80.22 FT p LOT " i PROP. PRECAST CONC. CURB X2_1 ,Q,ISiT,RICT AVENUE A B HcLANo 1 ISTRICT MAX. BLDG. COVER 25% 11.9% 22.6% W�ANO AVENUE —1 ISTRICT �: - - - = Q- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -- B-2 DISTRICT A B-2 DISTRICT 62'02'7g'• E PROP. BIT CONC. PAVING N `o MAX. HEIGHT FT 30 FT I N 51'53'36" E 67.88' 4� a 7g 44' N 51'53'36° E 138.42 33.00' 9A—Z PARKING SETBACK a i N N \ FRONT YARD 2 FT 6.66 FT 17.01 FT cm n z I 94-1 PARKING SETBACK < SIDE YARD 2 FT 0 FTs 0 FT. J nj 25 spaces PARKING SPACE V! 9'x17 (T-1p.) LOCUS PLAN w N W/ 2' OVERHANG N . PROP. BIT. CONC. PAVING I PROP. PRECAST CONC. CURB PARKING SETBACK REAR YARD 2 FT 5 FT 13.2 FT SCALE 1"-500' 1E. 22 spaces I SEAL PARKING 1 PER 4 SEATS=55 + 1 PER 2 EMPLOYEES 71 or 10; TOTAL = 65 SPACES SPACES 38' PROPOSED BUILDING 1 PER ,So s4 Fr. ; /JOM"" ( FF. ELEV. 103 PARKING t, 117 wALKr rt N J�l N 22,211 S.F.-5,000 S.F.=17,211 SF ha z lac J i 17,211 S.F./150 = 115 SPACES SPACES 3 26 spaces 00 J m Co PARKING SPACE gS n N 9 x1s (rYP.) $ * VARIANCE NEEDED. X _ PROP. BIT CONC. PAVING Iwo LOT A N 9 spaces m 8 spaces THE SIDEYARD PARKING SETBACK OF 0 FEET IS BECAUSE OF THE COMBINED 'NPARKING SITUATION BETWEEN LOTS A & B. Z 24' 40' ' ** SITE PLAN REVIEW REQUIRED FOR A NON RESIDENTIAL GROSS BUILDING AREA 01 OVER 10,000 SQ. FT. OVERLAY DISTRICT — 0 RAY DI TRI T OVERLAY DISTRICT 0 8 spaces PARKING SPACE r 9'X1?' (TYP.) 0 = 15'0 9 41 W/ 2' OVERHANG 133.00' R = 144.00' u' 8 spaces T = 19.16' L = 38.10' PARKING SPACE m 9'x17 (TYP.) PROP. PRECAST. CONC. CURB z $ w/ z' oVERHAr,c PARKING SPACE PROPOSED BUILDING 1 LOT B a w/ 2' OVERHANG DATE v FF. ELEV. e 107 a 21 spaces DRAWN RJ'1 U Cil I SCALE 1"=30' PROP. VERTICAL GRANITE CURB '' N / 8 spaces � I 105.30 — - 355.58' S 51 53'36" W 220.76' -- -- JS 51'53'56" W ' _-, r __� •.- _ -M__.__. PROP. CROSSWALK Im • _ , Li ZI ( 1946 STATE HIGHWAY LAYOUT ) AVENUE AVENUE $ m� HIGHLAND Ix PROP. VERTICAL GRANITE CURB OROW 61+00 62 00 63 00 64 00 65 00 66 00 67 00 59 00 6 �► I I I h'HT (X ,. A - �.�..�.�- 888 98' N 52'15'34 E ' PROP. VERTICAL GRANITE CURB C 1 , r I I n' Z , AVENUE HIGHLAND sl >- 5400 O � I a W a A a Q I 1 1614.55' I m ► _j HIGHLAND AVENUE - - LAYOUT AND MATERIALS 6700 F NOTES I S 51'21'05" W 608.32' L _ 03 1. ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS OBTAINED FROM A SURVEY CONDUCTED BY GLM ENGINEERING, INC., HOLLISTON, MASSACHUSETTS, IN JANUARY, 1995. I 0 15' 30' 60' 2. THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES IS APPROXIMATE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT "DIG-SAFE" AT 1-800-332-4844 BEFORE CONDUCTING ANY EXCAVATION OR DEMOLITION. 00398.00 NO DATE I REVISIONS A 3/31/q5 PLANNNG BJAIF SIMS B 4/27/q5 FrVY FOR PL,* MG ALTERNATE TOP SLAB. REINFORCED TO MEET H-20 LOADING ALTERNATE TOP SLAB. REINFORCED TO MEET H-20 LOADING MANHOLE FRAME Q COVER SET FRAME N FULL i' DLA DROP BED OF MORTAR FRONT TYPE MANHOLE FRAME k COVER SET FRAME IN FULL M.H. STEPS BED OF MORTAR ADJUST TO REWIRED GRADE A A ADJUST TO REQUIRED GRADEW/MIN. 2 OR MAX. 4 W/MIN. 2 OR MAX. 4 1" DIA. DROP BRICK COURSES OR EQUIVALENT 1' Dol DROP BRICK COURSES OR EQUIVALENT —T FRONT TYPE DIMENSION WITH REINFORCED FRONT TYPE DIMENSION WITH REINFORCED = M.N. STEPS DIAMETER CONCRETE COLLARS. 5' x S• --�. REINFORCED TO MEET $2 ALTERNATE TOP SLAB. M.H. STEPS Yd+/- CONCRETE COLLARS. [_` DUMETER H-20 LOADING DIAMETER I Sii � PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE I PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE b i 0. M.H. CONE SECTION b i� O0' x 8' ARCED CONCRETE MIN. WEIGHT 200 LBS- RGRAIE1E GRADE ADJUSTMENTS.BRICKS MAY BE USED F� F STANDARD COVER MIN. 0.12 N. STEEL PER TYPE-A FRAME TWO COATS HEAVY p M.H. CONE SECTION I u I VERTICAL FIN. PLACED MIN. WEIGHT 285 LBS. FRAME TO BE SET IN BODIED TAT! EMULSION G + VVVITICAL FOOT, PLACED �_ zMFUE BED OF STEEL PER MORTAR MIN. 0.12 IN. STEEL PER ACCORDING TO AASHTO MATERIAL CAST IRON VERTrA. FOOT, PLACED DESIGNATION Mt99 DIAMETER ACCORDING TO HASHED ACCORDING TO HASHED 2g' ACCORDNG TO MSHTO DESIGNATION MIPS (COVER) N R /- VERTICAL FOOT, PLACED 4'-d DIAMETER G . DESIGNATION M199 DESIGNATION M199 HEIGHT OF 4'—d DIAMETER RISER SECTIONS 3C iP V�'i FLEXIBLE JOINT SEALANT - TO FILL iv AT LEAST 75% OF JOINT CAVITY VARY f4' 1• CLEAR PROVIDE 'V OPENINGS HEIGHT OF t• CLEAR PROVIDE 'Y OPENINGS o DIAMETER 1' TO 4' t' CLEAR OUTSIDE OF PIPE RISER SECTIONS 28 1/4' +7'OUTCE R PIPE MONOLITHIC MANHOLE 7 CLEAR +Y CLEARANCE VARY FROM -'-OUTSIDE OF PIPE 1. 28 1/4' 1' CLEAR +2' CLEARANCE (VSE ITHICSECTIM MORTAR ALL JOINTS V TO 4' 1-+Y CLEARANCE I I 5 MIN. CEMENT CONCRETE CLASS 'K 18' DIA. I MORTAR ALL 5 MIN. CLDI bPROVIDE 'Y OPENINGS VARIES ENDING 1-}} BAR AROUND OPENINGS -;� 7/8' L �\ o HQCHf OFb ON OVM�OF PIPE FOR PIPES 1S DAAETER MORTAR ALL JOINTS II L� ELEVATION OF TABLE TO b PIPE TO MANHOLE CONNECTIONS _ - AND OVER, 1' COVER EXISTING J �rC 24•� ,S l� m RISEVARY FROM n tMINrM.JM 17) RISER SECTIONS SEAL BE 2 } DANA. OF PIPE SHALLBE PREMOLDED ELASTOMER8C t' x S' STORM 1' TO 4'/ PIPE OPENINGS TO BE PRECASTSEPARATOR TO BE JOIT(TS 6 CAST N PLACE BASE IN RISER SECTION DRAJN CULVERT •�'P RED EQCLASS 'A• CONCRETE GROUPISECTION A-A PLACE BASE OR APPROVED EQUAL 8' CAST-IN-PLACE BASE STANDARD MANHOLE FRAME & COVER }- JOHN , PRECAST CONCRETE SEWER MANHOLE PRECAST CONCRETE DRAIN MANHOLE PRECAST SPECIAL DRAIN STRUCTURE NOT TO ( L T � wnLJlE NOT TO7� NOT TO SOME NOT MWALE PRECAST CONCRETE CATCH BASIN ;`:� " G s WITH GAS AND OIL SEPARATOR ' war tp 9CAAL ` 2•-T�I FINISH GRADE. FOR MATERIALS 4TH FLANGE I I SEE SITE PUN WHEN REQUIRED -� 2'- A CA MAIN 000000 OOOOCO I ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 1111 VARIES -+ oa00oo 000000 � 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n D 0 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ m ROTATE REQUIRED o a 0 0 0 0 o a 0 0 0 0 0 r HYDRANT TO BE QUIRES A5 REQUITED 000000 000000 I 0 0 0 0 ❑ ❑ TO GRADE AS REQUIRED I o . o 0a0000 000000 - I ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ /� 2 OR S WAY CONNECTION •'° • �• ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ AS REWIRED I • P• o ' . 0 lar DEPTH RIP RAP SLOPE PROTECTION I iO . p (_ FINISH GRADE-1 µ0 VALVE BOX I •• o 'p _ DATE 2/14/95 PIAN .o. OO DRAWN RJM . PIAN I COMPACTED FILL • o -°. SAWN TOP 1 e SCALE N.T.S. . o IB• DEEP GRANITE CURB, W—TT STANDARD LENGTH t'-11 J/4•—^t - EARTH UNDISTURBED I EXISTING FINISH GRACE �� LL�� NOTES: IN i 8• GATE VALVE I • o i TOPSOIL SPLIT FACE 1 t/C 2 t/2' FRAME AND CRATE 1. MIN. FRAME wEwT7T 'i r'i r i WATER MAIN b �_I 7 I U.J. FIRINGS (TP) e' DEPTH GRAVEL 34 FLANGE 295 LOS FLANGE LBS Iv b I 2 TIE RODS (TYP) I FILTER BLANKET I r1 BIT. CONIC. WEARING COURSE MIN. 0.12 N. STEEL PER 2. MATERIAL-01ST D20N �� CLASS 'N CONCRETE ....,, n (1 EACH SIDE) \ BR, CONIC. BASE COURSE T er T VQtT1CA1 FOOT. PLACED 3. ANN. GRATE COELOM BACKING AGAINSTEET UNDISTURBED ..�.T••., I ,o•e••O.• SAND-GRAVEL BASE b ACCORDNO TO AASHTD 200LBS. MATERIAL !•i.;,; 0:•••?• . o DESIGNATION M799 2'-0 1/C �!.•. NOTES: °:o• •?• o° ° o - PROVIDE 7 CU. FT, oo CLASS 'C CONCRETE . ..... 5'-(T DIAMETER ---TTT-- 7/6 � •$ p0 °8 1. EXTEND TOE OF RIP RAP SLOPE TO AN .. . . . �OUTSIDE OF PIPE tv t/7 TO I CRUSHED BALKING AGAINST TO�SURABLE SUBGRADE, WHICHEVER IS r-� ? •..... •e .? a COTTER LINE STONE OR BANK RUN GRAVEL BEDDING UNDISTURBED MATERIAL .?. •p• .e. • o. +7 1:11'ARA•ICE 4 GRAVEL TO A7 LEAST GRUNTER. n, e, e, ,o;• ,o, 1' CLEAR J K ABOVE DRAIN HOLES. ' MORTAR All. ,e, e, o•• ,o. PROVIDE •Y OPENINGS —.151,8' TYPICAL HYDRANT & VALVE .•° '• `"�• m JOINTS r-a }/r HEIGHT OF In «� DEPENDING 21'°' NOT TO� TYPICAL SECTION FOR •e• RISER SECTNINS 5 MN. (MINIMUM t2') RIP RAP SLOPE PROTECTION VARY FROM 4' SEPARATOR TO BE SECTION A—A NOT TO se'AIE *NEENAH R-3705 1 OR APPROVED EQUAL VERTICAL GRANITE CURB rCAST-IN-PLACE BASE STANDARD CATCH BASIN FRAME & GRATE NOT TO NOT TO SCALE PRECASTCONCRETE DOUBLE CATCH BASIN 1/. EXP. JOINTS I 50' MAX. SPACING BETWEEN EXP. ,ANTS AS D OILSEPARATOR ;I WITH G AN NOT To SCALE POLE ✓-SUPPORT NEI FILTER FABRIC POLES BACKFILL SECTION 8 i .p• 1I- VARIES - SEE PLAN 4, •:{. :+. FINISH I ' BR. CONIC. PAVING SECTION A ,a.• .e o: r BACK OF CURB GRADE I �•'.: 1/4' EXP. JOINTS j#WA• 8'x 8' W.W.N. GRAVEL BASE TOP VIEW �a :,a +'.°: CONTRACTION .HINTS t' BTT. CONIC. WEARING COURSE ..A .A ..A .•A .•A ..A ..A !4 A., b .,�: UNDISTURBED •.e.:k I SOIL ° '•A �+� ,� Y BIT. CONIC. BATE COURSE . 4 - A:'4 b o ° o 0 o D A -COUPLER NOTES O O 0 0 0 0 O 0 O O C++ v 4•-A POLE SUPPORT NEI • • 0 •0• • O•0•' •O'. • 0•• • 0 O 17 SAND-GRAVEL BASE �. GRAVEL BASE o 1. ALL SIDEWALKS SHALL BE 4• THICK 00 O 0 0 0 • [{[F��ILIII •O. O •0 •0 C lr e e FILTER FARP.X: 2. CDIlTRACTTON JOINTS T13 BE SPACED • • O f WIDTH FOR SIDEWALKS LESS THAN 10'-0' ' • • " p 4r AT INTERVALS EQUAL TO THE SIDEWALK O • •0 • O' O . .0 O e ' BACKFILL WIDE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. `7Y-+-B• I It I 3. FOR 1R DR WIDER TS AT LKS SPACE 1/2' EXP. JOINTS ' SECTION A SECTION B CONTRACTION JOINTS AT 5'-0' INTERVALS ,/ • AND A LONGITUDINAL CONTRACTrON JOINT R. ' .a•, :'�� IN THE CENTERLINE OF THE SIDEWALK. NEW RXIDING PAD CONCRETE SIDEWALK A. CONTRACTION WITH A SHALL BE 1' DEEP NOT W SCALE. AND EDGED WITH A 1/8P RADIUS. .o• A.ip. • • • ! �.• �•�•• + .`�: .. Ac UNDIS-TURBED 5. WHEN SIDEWALKS ABUT A ROADWAY, WHERE ° • •••: J•.':'. �. •.• e• , `p. SOIL THERE IS NO CURB. THICKEN WALK TO 6' j. , : . IN 3' PAVEMENT DETAIL 6. USE L2• EXPANSION MATERIAL WHERE NOT TO SCALE CONCRETE SIDEWALK ABUTS CONCRETE JOINING SECTIONS OF FENCE TOE-IN METHODS STRUCTURE. D SEE DOTE YS _ 1^ 7. A LAYER OF R15 FELT IS REQUIRED BETWEEN I Q 2/3 D VALK AND AD-W-ENT PARALLELING CONCRETE a�:�,J.• • • �.'t `V •� Ff MIN. CURE �: j:•.aA EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL FENCE SEE CONC. SIDEWALK AND PAVEMENT DETAILS NOT TO SCALE F r _ w AAV•t e��• T zV 11I i-x-.i SIDEWALK NOT DETAIL ,�- 72:1 CURB TRANSITION PLAN - TEE AND PLUG PUN - HOR2. AND VEITT- BEND 1/Y CHAMFER 3/C R w. / . o tK DEEP PRECAST CONCRETE CURB (/ (' TOPSOIL (WHERE APPLICABLE) 5000 P.S.L M.N. STRENGTH. PAVED AREAS NON PAVED AREAS o _ B'-0' STANDARD LENGTH L OR Y BTT. CONIC. WEARING COURSE ! TOPSOM1. 1 ! ! 2 (! 1 1 S-5 NEW PAVEMENT 8'-C' _ SAND—GRAVEL BASE 0.-0. •�2.2 D/4 `• - BIT• CONIC. BASE COURSE EXISTING PAVEMENT EXISTING OR NEW GRADE PROVIDE FULL BRIE WIDTH FACE OF CURB CDW CONSULTANTS, INC. ' o,•�•,o, L0 .`. Y, ^ - - ,. . O o O o OVERLAP AT ALL CORNERS o. o SAND—GRAVEL BASE --- -- ;trlr o ° o o - 111 BOFFIN STREET J �. D/4 ° 0. / _ EARTH LL —� ° ° O O o SURE 119 ii FRAMINGHAM, MA 01701 1 FAX. (508) 875-6517 >ffs. B NEW PIPE o° W TEL 508 875-2657 o a a 0 a VARIABLE To B Fr. w L I .�. .?. •?• .�. ,q. .q..o .°. t• r � 0 0 0 0 DRAINAGE srRucn,RE � I J K L M N O - 1'-V 7-V 1•-S 1!l .O, ° O' p, ; ° O O O O 2' MIN CLEARANCE '-(f t/2 MAX.MAx C .o. CRUSHED STONE 12:1 VAX• - IT TO 1C 1•-? 1'-C 1•-B• 5-10' 2'-1� t'-If ,o, •. .0. ,o, ,O, ,o, � 24• 1'-'r 2'-0' 2•-6' 5'-R 31-8' V-Ir ,O, .°. �• ; O ROADWAY ,a TEES AND PLUGS - II -- O ° 0 O •a .a.4 '.i .a •° .a• •a 7 1 .o LO' T• C m R _ ° ° a • .4 ... e.-0• 0._0• DETAIL b ° ° SHEET 22 1/2 tk 71 1/4 10 °. '�• .?. '�' .. o ° o ..•; .a. .• BENDS •. .. •... - . . . •�..�•... . . SIDEWALK SURFACE NOTE: 1 D 4'TD g 10 T'0 18' 2! 4TD 6 15T0 7S 24 •o, .°. .o. .°• .o, -I -1 1 L (. 1 !l f 1 STAKED AND ENTRENCHED 1 STRAW BALES GRAVEL BASE . X t•-R 3'-4' 3'-6' 1'-4 2'-IY 5'-8' 3/C TO 1' CRUSHED STONE CEMENT CONCRETE RAMPS • CRUNOTS SECTION STiFFTO EBROOMRED FINISH. TH A - Y t'-Y 1'-B T-4' 1'-0' P-Y 2'-4' + CRUSHED STONE WILL ONLY BE REQUIRED IF INSURABLE BEING LAID ARE I N GROUND 1 Y eEr+os ORF PIPE . BEING U1ID w IK MAY BE { WATER TABLE.BOTTOM TR PIPE MAY BE INLET PROTECTION /STRAW BALES THRUST BLOCK DETAILS PRECAST CONCRETE CURB P� QM I70TfOM QF TRENCH AND FJJ{Di l] BtCI(FlLIED. NOT TO SCALE NIT,p WHEEL CHAIR RAMP NOT TO EXCAVATION & BACKFILL DETAIL NOT TO FOR UTILITIES NOT TO WNL NO DATE REVISIONS A 3/31/q5 RafAY FOR REQ .------ --- B 4/2,/q5 a FOR PL-~G DDAIC A ti y of-e -- Je CLOyERp 4�AG�Sy� m>� -+- 94-5 - - — F "OON S�EFT ALF AVENUE 9�5 �fENLq WNI yr a q NUE ORLEANS AVENUE 0 LO / 10 spaces O AVENUE B HIGLAND � 1 QI,�TRICT H1a �No AS E 2-. DISTRICT -�— _ - -_ ___ � _ - - - N B-2 DISTRICT T B-2 DISTRICT N 9k , 9y2 1 # > — # I71TIT. 25 spaces LOCUS PLAN SCALE 1'-500' � 22 spaces L SEAL T > PROPOSED BUILDING -��t�0. 1 FF. ELEV. s 103 , WALK, 26 spaces a a 1 9 spaces 8 spaces 11 1 1 O0 R AY DI TRI T OVERLAY DISTRICT q OVERLAY DISTRICT u U ❑ +O 8 spaces $ 14' 8 spaces 0 PROPOSED BUILDING FF. ELEV. 107 a 21 spaces DATE 7 lq9b DRAWN R,1'1 SCALE 1"=30' B spaces _ 105.30' t Imm I % PROP CROSSWALK JI I r- _ I HIGHLAND ( 1946 STATE HIGHWAY nLAYOUT ) AVENUE Ig AVENUE W _ �� _ . . _ I t _ .. � ��w,e'::e'ns�•.��:.:::...r .��.`;�!^ -�-s+.e...a.—n.s�.is-.-aiassae�.�.ss�...'.' �^ < am 59 00 6th + 6100 I 62 00 63 00 64 00 65 00 66 00 67 00 I � I N 5275'34 E _. _.�._.. s rrc o ;ti;�' 888.98' I 8 j a•'i a r - r I1p al I zl I AVENUE Q HIGHLAND Oo 594-00 Lu a w -}- - PROPOSED WHITE PINE ow Q A cn Q+ - PROPOSED SHRUB j — PROPOSED LIGHT � ( I 4 ! t 1614.55' I i I ml ? ; HIGHLAND AVENUE l --- — �� LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE PLAN 6700 I I NOTESl 608,32' _- - - i S 5121'05" W L � 05 1. ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS OBTAINED FROM A SURVEY CONDUCTED BY GLM ENGINEERING, INC., HOLLISTON, MASSACHUSETTS, IN JANUARY, 1995. 0 15' 30' 6C' 2. THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES IS APPROXIMATE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT "DIG-SAFE" AT 1-800-332-4844 BEFORE CONDUCTING ANY EXCAVATION OR DEMOLITION. 00398.00 T LI.