Loading...
64-123 - 29 CONGRESS STREET - CONSERVATION COMMISSION V'� �� � -- . - ,--� -94 Form 5 DEOE File No. 64-123 .. .... .. . ...:' ITo be prowled by OEOE) Commonwealth GtyRa+n Salem of Massachusetts Shetland Properties Order of Conditions Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act C.L c. 131 40 From Salem Conservation Commission. TO Shetland Properties same . (Name of Apples) (Name of property owner) same _ Address 29 Congress St, , Salem Address J This Order is issued and delivered as follows: I; ❑ Eby hand delivery to applicant or representative on (date) ❑ by certified mail, return receipt requested on (date) This project is located at 29 Congress St, , Salem The property is recorded at the Registry of Essex Book pa9P , Certificate(if registered) -- i The Notice of Intent for this project was filed on October 2. 1985 (date) The public hearing was closed on October 10, 1985 (date) Findings The Conservation Commission has reviewed the above-referenced Notice of Intent and plans and has held a public hearing on the project Based on the information available to the Commission at this time,the Commission has determined that the area on which the proposed work is to be done is significant to the following interests in accordance with the Presumptions of Significance set forth in the regulations for each Area Subject to Protection Under the Act(check as appropriate): ❑. Public water supply ❑ Storm damage prevention ❑ Private water supply ❑ Prevention of pollution _ ❑ Ground water supply ❑ Land containing shellfish ❑ Flood control ❑ Fisheries 5-1 95 Therefore,the Commission hereby finds thatthe following conditions are necessary,in accordance with the Performance Standards set forth in the regulations,to protect those inter- ests checked above.The Commission orders that all work shall be performed in accordance with said conditions and with the Notice of Intnt referenced above.To the extent that the fol- -lowing conditions modify or differ from the plans,specifications or other proposals submitted with the Notice of Intent,the conditions shall control. . General Conditions 1. Failure to comply with a0 conditions stated herein,and with ail related statutes and other_regulatory meas- ures,shall be deemed cause to revoke or modify this Order. 2. This Order does not grant any property rights or any exclusive privileges;it does not authorize any injury to private property or invasion of private rights. 3. This Order does not relieve the permittee or any other person of the necessity of complying with all other appficabie federal,state or local statutes,ordinances,by-laws or regulations. 4. The work authorized hereunder shall be completed within three years from the date of this Order unless either of the following apply (a) the work is a maintenance dredging project as provided for in the Act;or (b) the time for completion has been extended to a specified date more than three years,but less than five years,from the date of issuance and both that date and the special circumstances warranting the extended time period are set forth in this Order. 5. This Order may be extended by the issuing authority for one or more periods of up to three years each upon application to the issuing authority at least 30 days prior to the expiration date of the Order. S. Any fill used in connection with this project shall be clean fill, containing no trash, refuse,rubbish or de- bris, including but not limited to lumber, bricks, plaster,wire, lath, paper, cardboard,pipe, tires,ashes, refrigerators, motor vehicles or parts of any of the foregoing. 7. No work shall be undertaken until all administrative appeal periods from this Order have elapsed or, if such an appeal has been filed, until all proceedings before the Department have been completed. S. No work shall be undertaken until the Final Order has been recorded in the Registry of Deeds or the Land Court for the district in which the land is located,within the chain of title of the affected property. In the case of recorded land, the Final Order shall also be noted in the Registry's Grantor Index under the name of the owner of the land upon which the proposed work is to be done. In the case of registered land,the Final Order shall also be noted on the Land Court Certificate of Title of the owner of the land upon which the proposed work is to be done.The recording information shall be submitted to the Commission on the forth at the end of this Order prior to commencement of the work. 9. A sign shall be displayed at the site not less than two square feet or more than three square feet in size bearing the words,"Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering, File Number 64.123 10. Where the Department of Environmental Quality Engineering is requested to make a determination and to issue a Superseding Order,the Conservation Commission shall be a party to ail agency proceedings and hearings before the Department 11. Upon completion of the work described herein, the applicant shall forthwith request in writing that a Certificate of Compliance be issued stating that the work has been satisfactorily completed. 12.The work shall conform to the following plans and special conditions: 5-2 �t r i 97 Issued By Salem Conservation Commission Signature(s This order must be signed by a majority of the Conservation Commission. U On day of 19 before me spy gppparawi �i !l l i<� to me known to be the perso —person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she execiAed the same 'his/her free act and feed- Notary eedNotary Public My commission expires the applicant.the owner,any person aggrieved by this Order,airy owner Of Iand abuttng the land upon which the Proposed work is to be done or any ten residents of the city or town in which such tend is located are hereby notified of their right to request the Department of Environmental Ouatfy Enineermg to issue a Superseding Order,providing the request is made by certlfed mei{or hand deiivery to tti9 Depwtrnerd within ten days from the date of 6aance of this Order.A copy of the request shell at ins same it"be sent by camfied mai or hand delivery to the Conservation Cortmission and the applica i t I - Detach on dotted If"and submit to the prior to commencement of work . Issuing Aumonty . To Plesse be advised that the Order of Conditions for the project a File Number hes been recorded at the Registry of and has been noted in the chain of title of the affected property in accordance with Generai Condition 6 on_ - 19— If recorded land, the instrument number which identifies this transaction is 11 registered land,the document number which identifies this transaction i Applicant signature 5-4A 96 Plans: Title Dated Signed and Stamped by: On File with: Plans and narratives accompanying Notice of -Intent prepared by Gulf of Maine Research and Sasaki Associates, Inc. Watertown Maurice Freedman Consservation Com. Special Conditions(Use additional paper 9 necessary) Except as modified by this Order, .all .work shall conform to plans and calculations submitted with Notice of Intent dated 9/30/85g, ' . 2. Prior to commencement of construction7 soil analysis of material' to be dredged shall be submitted to the Conservation Commission for review and approval', 3. There shall be no landward storage of dredged materials, All dredged materials shall be transported by scow to the Federal Disposal Site, 4. Dredging shall be conducted so as to have minimal impact on smelt fishery. 5. Notification of commencement of dredging operation shall be given to the Conservation Commission at least 72 hours prior to com- mencement. The entire dredging operation shall last no longer than thirty (30) days. Any extension beyond this time shall be subiect to Conservation Commission approval. 6. Ail dredging must be completea by rebruary 1, 1986. ...........................................................__........_.................................................................................._......................... . (Leave Space Blank( . 5-3A Notice of Intent under the Massachusetts Wetland Protection Act G.L. 131 c. 40 Dredging and Marina Installation at Shetland Properties South River Salem, Massachusetts 01970 September 30 , 1985 w GULF OF MAINE RESEARCH CENTER INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SERVICES 30 CHURCH STREET SALEM, MA 01970 (617) 745-6618 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Notice of Intent - Standard forms 3-1 through 3-6 Appendix A Site Description, Part II of Notice of Intent Al to A2 Appendix B Work Description, Part III of Notice of Intent B1 to B2 Appendix C Map of Proposed Marina and Dredging Appendix D Wall Stability Study, December 28 , 1982 SIG Form 3 DEOE File No. (To be provided by DEOE) Commonwealth City/Town Salam of Massachusetts Shetland Properties � Applicant Notice of Intent Under the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act, G.L. c. 131, §40 and Application for a Department of the Army Permit Part 1:General Information 1. Location:Street Address 29 Congress Street Lot Number 2. Project:Type Dredging Description Dredge area between existing channel and south bank, adjacent to' 8hetland Properties. Expansion of existing marina. 3. Registry: County Essex County Current Book 5532 &Page 32 Certificate(If Registered Land) 4. Applicant Shetland prni,rties Tel. 7ea_0556 Address 29- Congress Street, Salem, MA 5. Property Owner Shetland Prooert; es Tel, 744_n5nG Address 29 Congress St. , Salem, MA 6. Representative Peter W. Krnnpnharq Tel. ;n—.44-^ 05,59;— Address Shetland Properties ,29 Congress St. , Salem, MA. 7. Have the Conservation Commission and the DECE Regional Office each been sent, by certified mail or hand delivery, 2 copies of completed Notice of Intent, with supporting plans and documents? Yes KI No ❑ 3.1 87 8. Have all obtainable permits, variances and approvals required by local by-law been obtained? Yes ❑ No Q See Below Status Obtained: : X � RrX Army (Corn of F.n , ) Parmit• �kMA-C�l9-gl_�2g� axtanA _t6 Ltse ��� , ��� DEQE (Div. of Waterways)License :#769 ,ext-anairu4_tQ 2@qtember 25 ,19 96 Salem(P3anning Board)-Wetland and Flood Hazard Sipe iat Perm; +- • r_—ted Augu1980 ,st currently expired. . Salem(Con Com) Notice of Intent:#64-65, �FSiled May 28, 1980 S�1a arWpJhi�iiWeW srUb� tt&� snse94ictionIIrderpurrsuaen o Ltl cX� IYPOAdrG.L c. 130, §1057 Yes ❑ No V 10. List all plans and supporting documents submitted with this Notice of Intent. Identifying Number/Letter Title, Date Appendix A Part II : Site Description Narrative, Sept. 30 , 1985 Appendix B Part III : Work Description, Sept. 30 , 1985 Appendix C (Sheets 1,2 , 3 & 4) Maps of Proposed Marina and Dredging in South River Appendix D Wall Stability Study, Dec. 28 , 1982 11.Check those resource areas within which work is proposed: (a)LTJ Buffer Zone (b)Inland: ❑ Bank* Land Subject to Flooding, ❑ Bordering Vegetated Wetland' ❑ Bordering ❑ Land Under Water Body&Waterway• ❑ Isolated (c)Coastal: Z3 Land Under the Ocean' ❑ Designated Port Area ❑ Coastal Beach• ❑ Coastal Dune ❑ Barrier Beach ® Coastal Bank �2 Rocky Intertidal Shore' ❑ Salt Marsh' ❑ Land Under Salt Pond' ❑ Land Containing Shellfish' ❑ Fish Run' Likely to involve U.S. Army Corps of Engineers concurrent jurisdiction. See General Instructions for Completing Notice of Intent. 3-2 SS Part It:Site Description Indicate which of the following information has been provided (on a plan, in narrative description or calcula- tions)to clearly,completely and accurately describe existing site conditions. Identifying Number/Letter (of plan, narrative or calculations) Natural Features- Soils Ap am La,' ,r a Vegetation A Topography A Open water bodies(including ponds and lakes) " A Flowing water bodies(including streams and rivers) Public and private surface water and ground water supplies on or within 100 feet of site Maximum annual ground water elevations with dates and location of test " a Boundaries of resource areas checked under Part I,item 11 above Other Man-made Features: Structures(such as buildings, piers, towers and headwalls) C Drainage and flood control facilities at the site and immediately off the site, including C culverts and open channels (with inverts), dams and dikes " Subsurface sewage disposal systems C Underground utilities C Roadways and panting areas a Property boundaries, easements and rights-of-way Other Part III:Work Description Indicate which of the following information has been provided(on a plan, in narrative description or calcula- tions)to clearly, completely and accurately describe work proposed within each of the resource areas checked in Part I, item 11 above. Identifying Number/Letter (of plan, narrative or calculations) Planview and Cross Section of: Structures(such as buildings, piers, towers and headwalls) C: Drainage.and flood control facilities, including culverts and open channels(with inverts), dams and dikes C Subsurface sewage disposal systems&underground utilities " Q Filling, dredging and excavating, indicating volume and composition of material C Compensatory storage areas, where required in accordance with Part III, Section 10:57 (4) of the regulations Other Point Source Discharge Description of characteristics of discharge from point source (both closed and open channel), when point of discharge falls within resource area checked under Part 1, item 11 above, as supported by standard engineering calculations, data and plans, including but not limited to the following: 3.3 89 1. Delineation of the drainage area contributing to the point of discharge; 2. Pre-and post-development peak run-off from the drainage area, at the point of discharge, for at least the 10-year and 100-year frequency storm; 3. Pre-and post-development rate of infiltration contributing to the resource area checked under Part I, item 11 above; 4. Estimated water quality characteristics of pre-and post-development run-off at the point of discharge. Part IV:Mitigating Measures 1. Clearly, completely and accurately describe, with reference to supporting plans and calculations where necessary: (a) All measures and designs proposed to meet the performance standards set forth under each re- source area specified in Part 11 or Part III of the regulations; or (b) why the presumptions set forth under each resource area specified in Part If or Part III of the regula- tions do not apply. Coastal Resource Area Type: identifying number or letter ❑ Inland Coastal Bank(Tncluding rocky intertidal sho e)OISUpportdocuments The proposed work will impose no :impact of this coastal wetland resource. The Coastall3ank and Sea Wall will not be destabilized by restricting Appendix D dredging to four feet or greater distance from the Sea Wall. Wall Stability Study Coastal Resource Area Type: Identifying number or letter "C3 Inland of support documents Dredging and removal operations will effectively eliminate the tide. flat and lower the land under the ocean. No commercially or ecologically important resources exist in: either of these areas and thus no ecologically significant impact will occur. 3.4 90 ❑ Coastal Resource Area Type: Identifying number or letter ❑ Intend Of Support documents 2. Clearly, completely and accurately describe, with reference to supporting plans and calculations where necessary: (a) all measures and designs to regulate work within the Buffer Zone so as to insure that said work does not alter an area specified in Part I, Section 10.02(1)(a)of these regulations;or (b) if work in the Buffer Zone will alter such an area,all measures and designs proposed to meet the performance standards established for the adjacent resource area specified in Part II or Part III of these regulations. CS Coastal I Resource Area Type Bordered By 100•Foot Discretionary Zone: Identifying number or fetter ❑ Inland of support documents One disposal option requires dredged materials (Apprx. 4000 cu yds) dewatering and temporary Stora e on adjacent land oV�ned by Shetland Properties. Drainage from these materials will be directed to the nearest storm -sewer for immediate return to the ocean. Erosion and sedimentatinn will be con- trolled by the placement of sand bags around the perimeter of the storage area. Since this dredgin will occur during fall and winter months ,any noxio s odors emmanating ,from the pile should be minimal and temporary. Should they prove annoying, the application of lime (CaCO3) to the surface and/or Icovering the d any problem. 3-5 r 91 Part V:Additional Information for a Department of the Army Permit 1. COE Application No..v6-80->441 2. Gr,1ed-r A; sres Cg�lar7Qla (to be provided by COE) (Name of waterway) 3. Names and addresses of property owners adjoining your property: Permit obtained Army Corps of Engineers permit No. MA-SALE-81-328 dated Oct. 13, 1981 , has been revived and the expiration date extended to Dec. 31 , 1986 4. Document other project alternatives(i.e., other locations and/or construction methods, particularly those. that would eliminate the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters or wetlands). 5. 8'/2" x 11" drawings in planview and cross-section, showing the resource area and the proposed activ- ity within the resource area. Drawings must be to scale and should be clear enough for photocopying. Certification is required from the DiNion of Water Pollution Control before the Federal permit can be issued. Certification may be obtained by contacting the Divsion of Water Pollution Control, 1 Winter Street Boston. Massacnb 6etts 02108. Where the activity will take place within the area under the Massachusetts approved Coastal Zone Management Program, the applicant certifies that his proposed acUty complies with and will be conducted .n a manner that is consistent with the approved program. Information provided will be used in evaluating the application for a permit and is made a matter of public. record through issuance of a public notice. Disclosure of this information is voluntary however if necessary information is not provided. the application cannot be processed nor can a permit be issued. I hereby certify under the pains and penalties of perjury that the foregoing Notice of Intent and accompanying plans,documents and su porting data are true and complete, to the best of my knowledge. Signature of Applicant Date e--. Signature of Applicant's Representative Date FORM "Exception to ENC Form 6346 approved by HQUSACE. 6 May 1992". NED p100 (TEST), 1 MAY 82 This document contains a joint Department of the Army and State of Massachusetts eppion for a permit to obtain permission to perform activities in United State. raters. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) hes approved those Questions required by the US Army Corp. of Engineer.. OMB Number 0702-0036 end aspiration date of 30 September 1983 applies". This statement rill be art in 6 point type. 3.6 APPENDIX A SITE DESCRIPTION, PART II OF NOTICE OF INTENT A-1 APPENDIX A Part II : Site Description The site consists of a strip of land 600 ' long along the south side of the South River in Salem, Massachusetts. In colonial times, the South River was a major port which extended into the center of present-day Salem, but gradual channelization and filling over the years has reduced the river to its present state.Pickering wharf lies across the water from the site , whereas the old Naumkeag Mills Building (Shetland Industrial Park , Building No. l on the map in Appendix C) is immediately adjacent to the site. Four coastal wetland resource areas comprise the site : Coastal Bank, Rocky Intertidal Shore, Tideflat, and Land Under The Ocean. The foundation of Building No. l is a granite wall which forms the southern bank of the river at this point. This wall is a combination Coastal Bank and Rocky Intertidal Shore. However, as a bank , it does not contribute sediment to any adjacent beaches ; and as a rocky shore it displays the usual marine algae (Fucus vesiculosus and Ascophyllum nodosum) attached to the rocks which, along with barnacles , depict the usual rocky shore zonation as a result of the 9 ' to 11 ' tidal range. At the base of the wall, there is a band of Tideflat exposed at mean low tide. Land Under the Ocean comprized the sediment beneath mean low water. The narrow Tideflat appears to be grossly A-2 poluted, and there is no evidence of shell fish. Accordingly , it is unlikely that the Land Under the Ocean contains any commercially important resources . There is no evidence that the South River has supported an anadramous fish run in modern times . The upper reaches of the river have long been filled in and drainage reduced to culverts . The maximum existing elevation on the site is + 2 .9 ' (MLW) at the Wall. The minimum existing elevation on the site is 6 . 0 ' (MLW) at the channel. APPENDIX B WORK DESCRIPTION , PART III OF NOTICE OF INTENT B-1 APPENDIX B PART III : Work Description The project involves the clamshell dredging of an area approximately 600 ' x 50 ' to -7 ' (4000 cubic yards) of river bottom material (sand and silt) within the area south of the main channel and the Shetland Properties Building No. 1 wall which serves as the coastal river bank. Appendix C (sheet 2) shows the extent of the proposed dredging, its slope and depth. There are two alternatives for dealing with the dredged materials (negotiations for final disposal are still in progress) : 1. The establishment of a dewatering station for temporary storage of the dredged materials at the Shetland Properties prior to landfill disposal. 2 . Transportation of the material by scow to the Federal Disposal Site. The Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers have in accordance with Title 33 CFR, part 325 . 6 (d) revived and extended the permit expiration date MA-SALE-81-328 (dated Oct. 13, 1981) to Dec. 31, 1986 . The marine work will include (see Appendix C: sheets 1 , 3, & 4) : a. Approx. 600+ ' of main floating pier b. Twenty three (23) finger floats c. Two (2) floating sections d. One (1) floating section with electric pump-ejector to the sanitary sewer. B-2 e. One (1) fixed platform f. Four (4) gangways APPENDIX C MAP OF PROPOSED MARINA AND DREDGING PLANS PREPARED BY SASAKI ASSOCIATES,64 PLEASANT ST., WATERTOWN, MA. J VER \ S NA - loEµ6� itrem SOUNDINGS FROM `CONDITION SURVEY - / S SMET<gNO r SALEM BY ARMY CORPS OF ENG. / io.� 3 DiiROPERTIFS eAam'z - JAN Ipjl0AA,, GATE I e �) F It BUCK." n Q r _qJg BULKHEAD n GRANITE WALL `Lief FREE MAN ��,Ir /`Q. .-70 [QC'(/S` Polmer Covc a f Yoehl Club EYA<E . WO.A.A.eX.r /3276 cAS C ttt NOTES: - / ? _ � ARMORED SUBMARINE CABLE LIC.#5440. c W O2 PREVIOUS MARINA LIC. # 5890. PICKERING WHARF" EXISTING MARINA 6C.* 438. HERITAGE TRUST BRIDGE LIC.#3979- CITY. 210 ESSEX ST. �'}' / m ZI i O DATUM FOR SOUNDINGS IS MLW 0.0. SALEM, MA. - ' / 1 -� "'� ©.AREA BETWEEN BUILDING N0.1 AND m / --- - - ` -- - - -- - - - - - - CHANNEL-AND BETWEEN BULKHEAD-AND - / e CHANNEL TO BE DREDGED TO -7.0 MLW. 3 / + 9 - - (SEE CROSS SECTIONS, SHEET 2.). GATE OO GANGWAY- PUBLIC DOCK 0 12 T G SHETLAND OB FLOATING PIERS: 6' WIDE. a PROPERTIES "'' Ll '�-e•r Y y29 CONGRESS ST 9O FINGER FLOATS:4 WIDE, 20 LONG,30,O.C. '6 -•Q aQ SALEM,�LIA. 10 FINGER FLOATS:2' WIDE, 16' LONG,20'0.C. MARINA / II(©..FLOATING SECTION: 12' z 16' . LIC.4645 / J� O m - 2 W� 29 FLOATING SECTION: 12' z 16', WITH ELECTRIC PUMP-EJECTOR TO SAN. SEWER. {ye GATE 13 FIXED PLATFORM: 6' z 10'. v,d 14 GANGWAYS TO BE 4' x 30'. 4 CONGRESS STREET Q EXIST. GRANITE WALL TO BE REBUILT. PROPOSED MARINA AND DREDGING IN SOUTH RIVER AT SALEM O /oc 200 300 fEET COUNTY OF ESSEX STATE MA. APPLICANT: SHETLAND PROPERTIES O so io 0 METfR5 SHEET I OF 4. APRIL 8 1981 PLANS PREPARED BY SASAKI ASSOCIATES, 64 PLEASANT ST„ WATERTOWN, MA. EXISTING " _ 'SHETLAND PROPERTIES �,►� (ff - .. WALL ' SN / i 2. MAURICE rn FREEDMAN 4 0.0 MLw 4 !�O CHANNEL I c - C �C i \r 60' WIDE -EXISTING ��� 7. ; BOTTOM ' �i J I - 6 c / ; _B `PROPOSED =8: - 'DR E 00140 - -9 80 30 40 .30 20 10 O . C� FEET / - PROPOSED DREDGING SECT/ON A -A EXISTING SHETLAND LOCATION OF DREDGING SECTIONS - - - PROPERTIES WALL µLL,_— LIMIT OF PROP. 1981 n � - CORPS DREDGING _ ♦7 - 46 EXISTING'' ♦6 I BOTTOM {J .._ t2 EXISTING R CHANNEL O.O YLw W WIDE If i _y PROPOSED - J ' _� y I -4 �i DREDGING i S -6 AUTHORIZED _g -- -7 CHANNEL /7 ---_- -_ =9 BOTTOM 60 60 40 30 2D 10O - • FEET EXISTING .EXISTING - PROPOSED DREDGING SECTION B-B CHANNEL SHETLAND . - PROPERTIES - - 1 WALL —�� �5 - . I Y4 - , t; ' LIMIT OF PROP. 1981 4• y2 ALL DWO. THIS SHEET NOT TO SCALE /CORPS DREDGING 0.0 V L W _ PROPOSED MARINA If .EXISTING BOTTOM -2 AND DREDGING �. _j 1 -4 IN SOUTH RIVER 3 _6 PROPOSED DREDGINGj _9 - AT SALEM - '-- - I -8 - COUNTY OF ESSEX STATE MA. 70 so 60 40 SO 20 10 0 -9 FEET APPLICANT: SHETLAND PROPERTIES PROPOSED DREDGING SECTION :.0- C SHEET 2 OF 4. APRIL 81 1981 PLANS PREPARED BY SASAKI ASSOCIATES, 64 PLEASANT ST., WATERTOWN, MA. UILDING NO. I 38'A MIN CLEAT(TYP.). WOOD DECK STRUCTURE 12, EL.ILB 10°DIA. 12" DIA. TEEL ROD G PILE PILE CHANNEL - -� EYEBOLT SYSTEM - I(SO'WIDE)- FOR CONNECTING -FLOAT UNITS " 6' YO' CAP. 90 GAL. -TOGETHER FLOAT FINGER FLOAT r - POLYSTYRENE IS'FREWEIGHT TOLERANCE, TOO LBS. PER UNIT(4' x2') I I 7- -----.- I , - TYPICAL FLOAT S£C7/ON TYPICAL - FLOAT SECT/ON - - 6' RIGH C.L.F. 4 WIDE S' HIGH C.L.F. ,10/12 'DIA q EL.IS.O GATE WOOD PILE.}yTM, JP - . ..9.0 MXW GANGWAY PROPOSED FIXED - 40 - WOOD PLATFORM - - - - FLOATS 7 5a - _ CHAIN - "ROLLERS - _ 12 DIA. PILE _ REMOVE 'EXISTING DISTURBED (TYP,). - COURSES AND RECONSTRUCT TO ELEVATION 13.0 - - - - `� ZyAR1ES (SEE DREDGING GANGWAY WITH PLATFORM EA S7* -ENO - �� �r SECTIONS,SHEET 2). k G' HIGH C.L.F. _ TYP/CAL P/LE CU/DE _ W/ 4'.WIDE GATE I" GANGWAY NEW WALK NEW CONC. CAP - EXISTING.BULKHEAD GRAN.WALL SHETLAND PROPERTIES - - FLOAT '12' MIN. - - 12" DIA.PILE- ' - - PILE TOP-TO BE a1S.0 MLW GANGWAY AT WALL — W£ST END�s►''A'~4<y J. ROLLERS " Jg w (TYP) 6'-WIDEFLOATtNG r G + --PIER MP.URICI ✓ I:; - 2" DIA.PILE D FREEDMAN h - (TYP.) �\�Ib.20535 GANGWAY -WOOD BEAM 9OF FG)STF� WOOD DECKING -WOOD as 5T hA^ss, P/CAL P/L£ GUIDE THROUGH FLOAT ' -(TYP.) ALUM.PIPE NAIL 10' IJ�- : PROPOSED MARINA AND.DREDGING GRANITE BULKHEAD WALL TO BE IN SOUTH RIVER - RECONSTRUCTED G' NIGH C.L.F 'TO ELEV. 13.0 AT SALEM . CONC. CEM. LANDIN 4'WIDE GATE COUNTY OF ESSEX STATE MA. - - APPLICANT: SHETLAND PROPERTIES PLATFORM FOR GANGWAY ALL DWG.THIS SHEET -NOT To SCALE SHEET 3 OF 4. APRIL 811981 PLANS PREPARED BY SASAKI ASSOCIATES, 64 PLEASANT ST., WATERTOWN, MA. WATER LINE UTILITY POST ELECTRICAL-CONDUIT 8� WOOD DECKING �_______,�______„___ ___ ,'—; LAMP HOUSING L==L _ - CIRCUIT BREAKER AND OUTLET (TYR) -POLYSTYRENE FLOATS _„ WATER FAUCET (TYR) TYP/CAL SECTION AT UTILITIES WIRING SERVICE N.T.S. ACCESS' WOOD DECKING WATERLINE ELECTRICAL' CONDUIT ./ TYPICAL UTILITY NTS. .!"�ZN OF � yG FREEDMAN m .e UTILITY POST _ -_.BUILDING NO.- I - . ...... *IM.20595�0 _ 'O90 FGIST6_ ELECTRIC PUMP-EJECTOR FSS/ EN6 OHW( • - �l- moi•- _ . PILING (SEE SHEET 3) •I • ••�',. - SS SEWER n p :•/ - MANHOLE C.L.F. W/GATES . • / 4 „T” PLUG EXISTING ON WATERLINE GRANITE �••�• BULKHEAD BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT WALL �I PROPOSED :MARINA AND DREDGING IN SOUTH RIVER AT SALEM COUNTY OF ESSEX STATE MA. TYPICAL PLAN OF UTILITIES APPLICANT: SHETLAND PROPERTIES I z 40' SHEET 4OF 4. APRIL .B, I APPENDIX D WALL STABILITY STUDY, DECEMBER 28 , 1982 WALL STABILITY STUDY SHETLAND PROPERTIES BUILDING NO.1 29 CONGRESS ST. SALEM, MA Prepared by: BERNARD N. WEBB . P.E. 23 CAREY ROAD NEEDHAM, MA 02194 Tel: 449-1984 December 28, 1982 J ' WALL STABILITY STUDY SHETIAND PROPERTIES BUILDING N0. 1 PURPOSE: Confirm that lateral stability of north stone wall will not be jeopardized by dredging removal of soil as required to accomodate proposed marina . (References Marina Plan by Sasaki Associates, Revision of 4-1-81) METHODOLOGYi 1) Observations and photographs , summer of 1982 . 2) Research on topographical history of area. 3) Test pits at base of mall. 4) Test- boring program. 5) Interviews with marine contractor and engineer. 6) Structural calculations . ATTACHMENTSs 1) Test Boring Location Plan dated 9-1-82. 2 ) Test Boring Drilling Logs , B&J Drilling (8 sheets) . 3) Photographs of existing wall and explorations . 4) Test Pits. Field Data (rod probes) . 5) Structural Engineering Calculations dated 10-1. 6) North Wall 'Elevation (11" X 17" sheet) . 7) Section View Looking East DESCRIPTION OF TESTING PROGRAMi Exploration of the relevant terrain including a verification of bottom of wall location was made using a combination of hand dug test pits and selected test borings . Three borings were taken at low tide using a portable drilling rig . Results of this program are attached. Wall Stability -2- 12-28-82 CONCLUSIONSt 1) EXISTING STRUCTURE As indicated in Reference #7, the existing stone wall is a continuous support element for the six-story concrete structure . Such imposed vertical loads acting on the top of the wall strongly favor wall stability. Accordingly, the stone foundation may be considered laterally restrained at the top. 2) WALL DRAINAGE The open pointed composition of the wall allows for a free drainage of tidal waters in the receding phase . Such can be observed clearly at the site during outgoing tide . The building up of undesireable wet earth pressures against the Inside of the wall is minimized. 3) SOIL COMPOSITION The test borings revealed the presence of moderately dense sand-gravel material generally from the level of the wall bottom downward. Below that, so-called refusal of the boring probe was reached between 12 and 16 feet, indicating the exlstanee of hardpan or soft rock at those levels . Such materials offer good resistance to vertical pressures and to horizontal sliding tendencies . 4) FOUNDATION TYPE The bottom of the wall was ident- ifted by test digging and probing with rods and is located as shown on Reference #7. While the presence of piling could not be confirmed, the soil materials present in the area would suggest a possible combin- ation of piling and continuous wall soil bearing . Wall Stability - 3 - 12-28-82 5) SOIL BEARING PRESSURE VECTOR The attached calc- ulations reveal that the ratio of horizontal earth pressure to vertical gravity loadings is such that the resultant pressure vector is markedly downward . Such a fact is favorable to lateral stability of the wall base , particularly where the earth near the base of the wall is counted on to resist outward movement in the event of the dredging removal of .existing materials as proposed. 6) PROTECTIVE EARTH BERM In accordance with standard foundation design. practice regarding earth bearing footings , a protective slope of undisturbed earth called a berm (or anequivalent means ) is recommended. Such an element serves the purpose of providing standard resistance to frost penetration at extreme low tides in winter, and also safeguards against long-term erosion of soils at the base of the wall. SUMMARY CONCLUSIONS On the basis of this analysis , the author confirms that a dredging configuration as shown on Reference #9 ard Including the protective feature noted above will not adversely affect the existing building wall. It is recommended that all implimentation of such work be carried out utilizing the consultation of a qualified , registered marine sneer. \\ PREPARED BY: Bernard N. Webb , P.E. Attachments 23 Carey Road Needham, MA 02194 —PLRN 4s q - I - a2 $6 , • • o T33 T34 1O` P33 OTES Z �RIN�S PCi2�ORmEa 1 E5uoDvv.y, MA. J 2)'PbRrr+OL,E Piq t Om TIDAL F-1Y4T5 FOB, PL33 N O !ll L> � neo 1 F J t7 -Rmrg NT5., �PRbDADLE • � !2 ZELOCATIONS) . 1 Shetland Properties B & J DRILLING HOLE No. B-1 35 Congress St. 25 W�VU- R ROAD LINE A STA. SUDBURY, MASS. 01776 Salem, MA OFFSET JOB LOCATION Salem, MA - - SURFACE ELEV. PROJECT NAME Proposed Marina WATER LEVEL None at Comp DATE STARTED . 9 /8/82 BORING FOREMAN D. Pitcher DATE FINISHED 9/8/82 INSPECTOR I SCALE SAMPLE DEPTH 30"BLOWS STRATA IN PER 6' FIELD CLASSIFICATION AND REMARKS FEET FROM TO ON SAMPLER CHANGE 0 2' 4-5 4-3 Loose to firm Fill; Boulders, Sand, Gravel, Brick, Cinders, Silt, etc. 5 5' 7' 21-6 3-14 10 10' 10.5' 120 i Bottom of Hole 10.5' r— Refusal 120 Blows 0.5' Penetration with 1400 Hammer Note: Made two trials 5' then 10' toward the I building and was unable to penetrate past 11' . I i REMARKS: BLOW COUNT TAKEN WITH 140 LB. WEIGHT FALLING 30" ON 2" O.D. SPLIT SPOON UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED PROPORTIONS USED: TRACE = 0- 101,*, SOME = 10 - 351/0, AND = 35 - 50% Shetland Properties B & J DRILLING HOLE NO. B-2 35 Congress St. 25 WINDSOR ROAD LINE 3 STA, SUDBURY, MASS. 0I776 Salem, MA OFFSET JOB LOCATION Salem, MA - SURFACE ELEV. PROJECT NAME Proposed Marina WATER LEVEL 7.1' at Comp DATE STARTED 9/8/82 BORING FOREMAN D. Pitcher DATE FINISHED 9/8/82 INSPECTOR — —T SCALE SAMPLE DEPTH 30"BLOWS STRATA IN - PER 6" - FIELD CLASSIFICATION AND REMARKS FEET FROM TO ON SAMPLER CHANGE 0.5' 2.5' 2-4 2" Asphalt Pavement 4-11 Fill; Boulders, Sand, Gravel, Silt, .-. Brick, Cinders, etc. , some voids 5 5 7 ' 2-3 4-8 - 10 10' 12' 4-10 6-8 Bottom of Hole 13.0' _ Refusal 50 Blows 0" Penetration I with 40011 Hammer on open-end AW rod REMARKS: BLOW COUNT TAKEN WITH 140 LB. WEIGHT FALLING 30" ON 2" O.D. SPLIT SPOON UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED PROPORTIONS USED: TRACE = 0 • 1"o, SOME = 10 - 35%, AND = 35 - 5017b _Shetland Properties $ & J DRILLING HOLE NO. B-3 •35 Congress St. 25 WINDS ROAD LINE 3 STA. SUDBURY, MASS. 01776 Salem, MA OFFSET JOB LOCATION Salem, MA SURFACE ELEV. PROJECT NAME Proposed Marina WATER LEVEL 9.0' at Comp DATE STARTED 9/8/82 BORING FOREMAN D. Pitcher DATE FINISHED 9/8/82 INSPECTOR SCALE SAMPLE DEPTH 30' BLOWS STRATA IN PER 6" CHANGE FIELD CLASSIFICATION AND REMARKS FEET FROM TO ON SAMPLER 0.5' 2.5' 2-3 2" Asphalt Pavement 11-10 Firm Fill; Sand, Gravel, Brick, Cinders, etc. 5 5' 7 6-5 7-14 . 10 10.0' - - -- - . .. ..... ....._. 10' 12' S-7 Loose to firm brown Silt, I 4-3 12.0'! some fine Sand 15 Very compact fine to-coarse brown Sand, 15' 17' 44-42 some Silt 31-2 20 20 -------- ------ -- - _. 25 22 Sounding 25 26.81 Bottom of Hole 26.8' Refusal 50 Blows 0.8' Penetration with 40011 Hammer on open-end AW rod REMARKS: R1nw rounts frnm 201 to 26 A' were taken with 4QQ# hn=pr an Open-end . BLOW COUNT TAKEN WITH 140 LB. WEIGHT FALLING 30" ON 2" O.D. SPLIT SPOON UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED PROPORTIONS USED: TRACE = 0 - 1070, SOME = 10 - 35"Io, AND = 35 . 501Y. Shetland Properties B & J DRILLING HOLE NO. B-4 '35 Congress St. 25 WINDSOR ROAD LINE 6 STA. SUDBURY, MASS. 01776 Salem, MA OFFSET JOB LOCATION Salem, MA. - SURFACE ELEV. PROJECT NAME Proposed Marina WATER LEVEL 8 .5' at Comp • DATE STARTED 9/10/82 BORING FOREMAN D . Pitcher DATE FINISHED 9/10/82 INSPECTOR SCALE SAMPLE DEPTH 30"BLOWS STRATA INPER 6' FIELD CLASSIFICATION AND REMARKS FEET FROM TO ON SAMPLER CHANGE 0.5' 2.5' 10-34 2" Asphalt Pavement 19-15 Loose to firm Fill; Sand, Gravel, Brick, Cinders, Silt, etc. . 5 5' 78-7 7-8 • 10 10' 12' 6-3 g_ I r • 15 - 15' 17' 21-12 Compact to very compact fine to coarse gray Sand, 33-35 some Silt and fine Gravel 180' — — - - --... - - 20 Sounding 31 51 Bottom of Hole 22.5' Refusal 50 Blows 0.5' Penetration with 40011 Hammer on open-end AW rod REMARKS: Rlnw ' fn 99 S' werp taken with 400# hnmmpr on oppn-end - SLOW COUNT TAKEN WITH 140 LB. WEIGHT FALLING 30" ON 2" O.D. SPLIT SPOON UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED PROPORTIONS USED: TRACE = 0• 101k`. SOME = 10 • 35%, AND = 35 • 50% Shetland Properties B & J DRILLING HOLE NO. B-5 35 Congress St. 25 WINDSOR ROAD LINE 6 STA. SUDBURY, MASS. 01776 Salem, MA OFFSET JOB LOCATION Salem, MA SURFACE ELEV. PROJECT NAME Proposed Marina WATER LEVEL None at Comp DATE STARTED 9/10/82-- BORING FOREMAN D. Pitcher DATE FINISHED 910/82 INSPECTOR SCALE SAMPLE DEPTH 30"BLOWS STRATA IN PER 6'• FIELD CLASSIFICATION AND REMARKS FEET FROM TO ON SAMPLER CHANGE 0.5' 2.5' 11-7 2" Asphalt Pavement 12-12 Firm Fill; 5Sand, Gravel, Brick, Cinders, Silt, etc. 10-8 Bottom of Hole 9.1' Refusal 50 Blows 0.1' Penetration with 40011 Hammer on open-end AW rod I REMARKS: BLOW COUNT TAKEN WITH 140 L6. WEIGHT FALLING 30" ON 2" O.D. SPLIT SPOON UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED PROPORTIONS USED: TRACE = 0• 10�*. SOME = 10 - 35%, AND = 35 - 5091. Shetland Properties B & J DRILLING HOLE NO. PB-1 35 Congress St. 25 WINDSOR ROAD LINE 6 STA. SUDBURY, MASS. 01776 Salem, MA OFFSET JOB LOCATION Salem, MA - SURFACE ELEV. PROJECT NAME Proposed Marina WATER LEVEL Com Surface at DATE STARTED 9/8/82 BORING FOREMAN D. Pitcher DATE FINISHED _ 9/8/82 INSPECTOR SCALE SAMPLE DEPTH 30"BLOWS STRATA INPER$12' FIELD CLASSIFICATION AND REMARKS FEET FROM TO ON SAMPLER CHANGE - 11 21 12 Sounding 5 25 16 19 - 10 37 87 ion 1 12.0_' ----- ------ - ----- — - --.. --. ------- Bottom -----Bottom of Hole 12.0' Refusal 100 Blows 1.0' Penetration with 14011 Hammer Note: Blow counts taken with 14011 hammer. I i REMARKS: BLOW COUNT TAKEN WITH 140 LB. WEIGHT FALLING 30" ON 2" O.D. SPLIT SPOON UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED PROPORTIONS USED: TRACE = 0 • 101,*, SOME = 10 - 35%, AND = 35 - 50% Shetland Properties B & J DRILLING HOLE NO. PB-2 35 Congress St. 25 WINDSOR ROAD LINE 6 STA. g, SUDBURY, MASS. 01776 Salem, MA OFFSET JOB LOCATION Salem, MA SURFACE ELEV. PROJECT NAME Proposed Marina WATER LEVEL 0.2' at Comp DATE STARTED 9/10/82 - BORING FOREMAN D. Pitcher DATE FINISHED 9/10/92 INSPECTOR SCALE SAMPLE DEPTH 30"BLOWS --STRATA IN FER612" CHANGE FIELD CLASSIFICATION AND REMARKS FEET FROM TO ON SAMPLER 3 --- 6 1 1 -. . 5 4 103 45 - -- 88 Sou n ding 46 • 10 51 50 60 57 57 14.9' ---- - ._ 15 120 -- Bottom of Hole 14.9' Refusal 120 Blows 0.9 ' Penetration with 14011 Hammer On open-end AW rod I Note: Blow counts taken with 14011 hammer. REMARKS: BLOW COUNT TAKEN WITH 140 LB. WEIGHT FALLING 30" ON 2" O.D. SPLIT SPOON UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED PROPORTIONS USED: : TRACE = 0• 10'*. SOME = 10 - 35%, AND = 35 - 50^/0 Shetland Properties B & J DRILLING HOLE NO. PB-3 35 Congress St. 25 WINDSOR ROAD LINE 4 STA. SUDBURY, MASS. 01776 Salem, MA OFFSET JOB LOCATION Salem, MA SURFACE ELEV. PROJECT NAME Proposed Marina WATER LEVEL 0.7 ' at Comp DATE STARTED 9/10/82 BORING FOREMAN D. Pitcher DATE FINISHED9/10/82 -- I INSPECTOR SCALE SAMPLE DEPTH 30' BLOWS STRATA IN PER4'12" FIELD CLASSIFICATION AND REMARKS FEET FROM TO ON SAMPLER CHANGE - 2 1 3 16 5 S6 Sounding 2 2 4 10 9 13 12 8 30 15 109 120/ .8 15 8' Bottom of Hole 15.8' Refusal 120 Blows 0.8' Penetration I with 14011 Hammer on open-end AW rod Note: Blow counts taken with 1401E hammer. REMARKS: BLOW COUNT TAKEN WITH 140 LB. WEIGHT FALLING 30" ON 2" O.D. SPLIT SPOON UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED PROPORTIONS USED: TRACE = 0 • 10'!0. SOME = 10 - 35%, AND = 35 . 50% N co � O 7 CXSTG WDLL N 7 PI/ OrILE TIDriL SLOPE 13f 0 3...` I IG EL T it f Lq 4-r 0 13 `j l- G �c 0 51. Ia 1(� 76 REF. TO °.• EO DLOwC °. 30 l/i J .. Ig SURFFlCE PGR 31Fool . . . -158' r:z 100 -12.0 e1 -14.9 0'.O 21 ,5(UNC49saD) REFUSRL a°120Q t- 9 100 T1EFU5AL R o EFU AL c.•e '''fNGGATCS 1--OR7'r CLE RIG L-+CIRING (SOUNDING/ 1 �TT KiSN faT LOW TICS' goRING P131 LaORIn1G P132 �o�1nlG PCS3 LCG FRCrlLt S _�+HOWN 8 REFC=RENCE4��-I-HHHHHHHHHHHH' L'UILDING I 16.y . - �24 WEST Y GRI D COLUMNS H I ( fP�y! i I 1 DRnIN •� MgSS CCN,.RC-TE f�OUN W/a LL uranCN G-r4MNIrE S7'OIv6. SLFIWq I { i T10GK PILES Ex STG CriRTH ROCK SPOILS -.__ __-- __. _ TEST PIT �c PLOTTED RT TRGC CF DLD G TEST PIT 3 I TEST PIT' ! i G'Or/CM OF W/j LL SO TNL COURSES L'O-fTOM OF wgL1 _ 'PORING PDI APPX. 2.0" - j;ORING I B2 BORING 71433 NOT2TH WALL EELEV/gT/ON CXAGGCRr-IrED VERTICl9L SCRLE �8 1-r), NORIZ. SCq LE I"= 301. 5 gTO r;IE: r �Z 1ST FL � 5 20' 12' - 1—�UIL-DING NO / p TO CHANNEL 9HcrLr-INS �r<cY. ,n UI � J I J I 6nscrlElvr Q 'r� STONE IT' .. - SCA WA LL LID M H W —'- �- -- – Avar<cx. ul ' 1' Ex15TING 7U� - CFIRTH allO� l•, - CONgITICN / VlU OUTLINE CF PILES FLORTS AS SHOWN ON SASAIU Assac Tn wcS ! `�, A 1�1 ' n 6T" STONE 4' I JOINT- nowN 1 - I t _h -- - N - T � � RECOMMEI'IDEp LIMIT OF DREDGINGI RIPLPAP G6LANiKET - — —( 'OT�EbC'ING LINE 1 SURFACING 77aQUPPED LOOKING CAST 5HOW5 VERIFIED WALL C,ONrIGUA,97-(ON ! rDRtT)G1NG LIMITS NnLv 51 cr wraLL- -_:-I r-� I��L�IT-N �I-+ ETLY��i� _P�VIL'>]1N� i� I 1O - I • pji? 5 A-D-arL sT-orzil_S � Grzr-\\/i- Y L0J--) : �l✓rrz Q FT SLY�L35) r-� LL C)GO zsr l T2o(D S Ln[3 . 09G -, 159 - TOrz C ta2TEl 7—LO(DKS: 5L , dg0 S7f13ILI7Y pr)F.M PL L. L,. , co S0 ONLY _Q t t c) , ,x 5 FL.rz = .550 HINGE � -35Mr; /�55UY�1C 17 __ (�SSUIYI TOTIaL rc�l�m. LUt�pS - _ _ .'709 Ks� �Or0S 'PC2 T=OOT jNorC Tr�iPrrZIN9 13nY wlforl-i F1;cro2 . 709 x 5 x 17/.2 = 3 .OLK/rr 7LOO25 w _ 24 x 4-C/r 6 es 1 , 37 C o Ls. IOco 3 24x69/040 crap voIo r-racrcr< n; 3 VAT LE r�'RT11 P2LSsup- E �c-CS,UIVr� L-NT) '' Y WL"-LL "lDre-RlNL-fJ USC .045 UNIT Prce55URC � ec�r r, •p�r-5 X KIFT 2 Pn_E�sv2i~ yCG7-olZ (r-rzic N L=-XClur7c--ID) Prz(5S5WZC- (- Tl NG r-,T' t3Q1`(� _Tar, . 305 AerUt�l,l,Y IZCs1 rIN P2c55uRe I -- - _.9.------- ! 17. 2 16 . 54 — -prsslvE rnE r=lz.cssUt?� — T>I L E T-OP FTI GT-ION 1.Y»QC-DMI=IVT' /SGT ICU r:�T TOP Wn ,U I-I ec,Y}� = I/fix 5,06 = 1 . 69 K �6ar+v = t6. 54-10,5= 6.4G N�.= •26 F'I ELT LJ»TIl TCs r —F1 "` TtP of Lxrnr�cr �rzom ricrE-S TP 1v 9-3 TO Sc»wc-Cn �, J LINO n.3 TON CCURs�� ;Zon PRODC ��/ 5 TD 22• DCC--P IAGAI-IONS ;� �T`r'PIC(-)L� r —1iO2 -rop f 6CTrom Lc o o� wru, �lJ ER\F\C�HTION Top or T^ 970NE W1aLL .=.fes • '. --% Tc^�n��N ��NO n�•�(. ��� _ CONpiTICtV� p(ZFV(N7f_-f F�2opG C OF i:orT•Om LDv G r_ VeRlrl Eb 1.11 1 Jp-onu I _VIEW L-c�OIGINCj L_FSi CONC PiE2 CRAP M D T-Lr4rs 2-0 fp FtOE5�;ELI- i F001-1Na I Roo 5" 0 PILL- CPP pl?CDF (( C��=VRTION LooKir\)c _Cr�sT /�T N.W. COR-NC-2 .e i o •. t �l�pFy 7t �� i 4.. fly. i � +�.• �. s .-. JI. !y { [ a a t � . iv% a ljS w• 1 ,q., yy'��, S�! g4�,Y V.. -. �L�' - r a _ iI.1 IJbY" C - I . I. { � t tt T' 1 # F � L, tt 9 j �•e t � ate: `%OK CO3 41L, X� Conservatim C'I.DH 11t • •t13H1 Salem. Massachusetts 01970 hfAss?,or March 14, 1986 Dr. Hugh Mulligan Gulf of Maine Research Center 30 Church Street Salem. MA. 01970 Re: Shetland Order of Conditions, DEQE #64-123 Dear Hugh: At last evening' s meeting of the Conservation Commission, it was voted to allow dredging activity to take place between April 16 and May 1 , 1986. This decision was based on recommendations from the Division of Marine Fisheries and the Harbormaster. All other conditions set forth in the Order of Conditions issued on October 25, 1985, shall be adhered to. . Please feel free to contact Dale Yale at 744-4580 if you have any further questions. Sincerel yours , Philip D. Moran __.. Chairman cc: Peter Kronenberg, Shetland DEQE Jim Cahill, Harbormaster Russell Iwanowicz, Cat Cove Marine Labs �+•�OMD1�ty� CITY OF SALEM s Harbormaster ;r P.O. Box 8351 4 Salem,Massachusetts 01970 Tel. 741-0098 JAMES F.CAHILL HARBORMASTER March 12, 1986 Ms. Dale E. Yale Salem Conservation Commission One Salem Green Salem, Ma. 01970 Dear Dale, This is to verify that permission has been granted for a new start-up date on the Shetland Properties dredging project. The new date is April 16, 1986. This date is immediately after the restricted time period for winter flounder protection as recommended by H. Russell Iwanowicz of the Commonwealth of Mass. Division of Marine Fisheries. All conditions of the original Order of Conditions will remain in effect. I recommend that the dredging be expedited as soon as possible after this date. Sincerely, JAMES F. CAHILL Harbormaste=r JFC/saa _ ri' E'.'w - G6G.1Go/L O� (Ll�G2e L6/Lel�Ge6 5 i919866 (o (&061 & a/ Cooae �� � SAI ENI PLA'iNNING DEPT. I '92 `�w J4�iveizae, yal". 07970 March 3, 1986 Ms. Dale Yale Salem Conservation Commission One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Dear Dale, Hugh Mulligan requested that I contact you in reference to the Shetland Dredging Project. In previous correspondence to you (1/14/86) relative to acceptable dredging dates for this project, I indicated that dredging activity should cease on February 15th. Apparently this project has met with a time delay and Mr. Mulligan is now looking for an acceptable startup date. It would be my recommendation for this project that no dredging activity take place during the February 15 - April 15 time period This time restriction is recommended to protect the winter flounder population in the Salem - Beverly Harbor area. If you have any questions please feel free to give me a call. Sincerely,-do"144�6k� Russetf Iwanowikz Marine Fisheries Bi" to ist :mg cc: Hugh Mulligan GULF OF MAINE RESEARCH CENTER INC. >Q ` ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SERVICES RECEIVE O CHURCH STREET SALEM, MA 01970 DEC 16 11985 (617) 745-6618 SALEM PLANNING DEPT. December 12 , 1985 Mr. APalter B, Power Chairman, Planning Board One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Dear Mr . Power: Please be advised that the proposed- dredging of the South River adjacent to the Shetland Properties, Salem, Massachusetts , will commence on January 6 , 1986 . This dredging will be carried out as specified in Corps of Engineers Permit MA-SALE-81. 328 Mass . DEQE Dept . of Waterways License 769 City of Salem Special permit , wetlands and flood district. This operation will be completed by January 30, 1986 . If any more information is required, please contact either David Black or myself. Sin cerely, U -14 HFM:jm Hugh F. Mulligan, Director CC : - Peter Kronenberg Shetland Properties s�\O\ Cpy ` Salem. Massachusetts 01970 Fy c5 yASS CITY OF SALEM CONSERVATION COMMISSION Will give a public hearing under the wetlands Protection Act, Mass G.L. , Chap. 131 , Section 40, at the request of Shetland Properties, Congress Street. The purpose of the hearing is to explore the effects of dredging-,ori the south side of the South. River east of Congress Street • Bridge, and the construction of a marina adjacent to existing Shetland Property. This hearing will be held on Thrusday, October 10, 1985, at 7 :30 p.m. , One Salem Green, second floor conference room. '�! )�'y D- v'qwv _ Philip D. Moran - - Chairman Oct. 2 �Cr'tlt-IIf((,!' Crit(' O�' !'/71+(r!•lT177f7/f�l./�[% tXY��-lf��, IL U �:l rI4 JIAI+ n�%�!l(Q�+ll.1 al+�%!a[t rIINV! ✓1fOI�{Q[.IL11J S. RUSSELL SYLVA �iu J�i+lir 9 �r halos+ OP40d Comminionei November 14, 19 Shetland Properties Shetland Properties c/o Peter W. Kronenber 29 Congress Street — �- _,_„— — - 9 Dredging R�L� 29 Congress Street Dredging at marina Salem, MA 01970 NOV 2 01985 SALEM PLANNING DEP;. I This will acknowledge receipt of your Notice of Intent to perform work subject to Chapter 131, Section 40, of the General Laws (amended by Ch. 818, Acts of 1974). From your plan, Notice of Intent and this Division's investigation, it has been determined: A license will not be required at this time under the provisions of Chapter 91 of the General Laws, however, a permit may be necessary from the local Conservation Commission subject to Ch. 131, S. 40: also if a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Permit is required, the applicant MUST apply to the Division of Water Pollution Control for a Water Quality Certifictate. X A Lfiwill be required at this time under the provision of Chapter 91 of the General Laws. Enclosed are rules and regulations for filing under said provisions. All work shall be subject to all other related provisions of law, by-laws, ordinances and regulations that may pertain. Very '1truly yours, V'�Nt Charles J. atale, r. Sectio Ch of CC: Conservation Commission Salem DEQE Region III United States Armv Corps of Engineers Division of Water Pollution Contro' - Pe:--its - - Wetlands File No. ___64_-123_ ___... CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS PLANNING DEPARTMENT .,,,conupt� GERARD KAVANAUGH ONE SALEM GREEN CITY PLANNER , - 01970 w y (617(744.4580 B January 24, 1985 Mr. David Black Cuff of Maine Research 30 Church Street Salem, MA. 01970 Re: Shetland Properties - Proposed Marina, #64-123 Dear Mr. Black: Pursuant to our telephone conversation earlier this week, the Conservation Commission voted to extend the time Limit within which dredging can be accomplished to February 15, 1986. This judgement was based upon an opinion from Cat Cove Marine Labs confirming that this extension will have no, adverse impacts on fishery spawning. I would be happy to discuss this with you further if you wish. ,. Sinc r(eQlyy yours, Dale E. Yale Staff advisor cc: Peter Kronenberg. . DEQE I